alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- ... L • I 

I, REF ID:A63518 

Secretary 

'?he Cosmos Cllib 

2l2l :Maess.chueett• Aveiwe, 11.w. 

Washington 8, D. c. 

Dear nr. o..beerl 

I expect to be in Im1&>n tar a rev da¥& 4Ur11!1 the 

latter pt.rt ot Pebrua.r7 or -.r~ :part or Ha.rch, 1955· 

Would you be ao kind u to aend m a card vhich 

vill e-ble me to avail JQ'sel:t ot the tacilitiea ~ the 

Se.vile Clubt 

SiDCereq, 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 06-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
REF ID:A63298 

xr. Alfred Pr1entt.ly 

ua1st&nt ManasSng !:dito:r 

!he Wa.alli.ngtcm Poet and !imee Jlel'al4 

1515 L etreet, a.w. 

Waahington 51 t>. o. 

near Ali 

Lat • tbl,s)k 70u tor your pl'Ollipt return ct 1lfl clip I 

----·-- --

tile on Peteraen, but AOre ••~iall.1' terr '10UI' YV1' lliee 

J.etter. I vu pretty cuntide.~:t tba't JOU 'WQJ.14 reach tho 

CQ:QClWliOU Md decision J'OU 414 re.ch. I do aaree ihat, 

1n th1• caae, •Ue:tlC'J t. ID"e UBtul tblui pu'bl1cit¥• 

Oeneral C.ahie Job>.s • 1n thanking )tO".i uad. 1n 

CJCtendhig eord!al piee\ing•• 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 06-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105
- 2498

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION July 21 , 2011 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with Environment Canada FROM: Angela Cullen , Mechanical Engineer TO: Docket EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2010
- 0162 This memorandum documents a meeting held on March 24 , 2011 b etween E nvironment Canada and EPA and included the following individuals: E nvironment Canada : Stephan Couroux and Luis Phillipe EPA: By ron Bunker and Angela Cullen The discussion focused primarily on aerodyn amic testing of heav y duty programs at Natural Resources Canada and Transport Canada.
REF ID:A603. 

USCIB: 29.19/14 ]3 December 1954 

24 

MEMORANDUl{ FOR THE :MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: USCIB 29.19/JJ of 6 December 1954. 

All Members having indicated no objection to the proposed 

message circulated under cover of subject document, said message 

was sent this date. 

USCIB: 29.19/l4 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 05-15-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
REF 

Mr. John l\. Booth Ge~ M$1.).agt'r 1 ~cb:Rep Di 'rla1on 

lh11eo Corporation ltm Stn.t and. 1.ehi,gh Avenue lh.U.-.d~ l.pM.a 32, P81lllliy l vatrl.& 

Deer JI&' • Jooth I 

lixtce Mr. wuu.m F. hiedman u out ot town, l vah 

to acknov~ your letter to him rd l' lul¥ 1954 and 

~ ;you to:r cle&i'11lg up the couf'uaion in reo&rd to t.be 

fOl$lble ~rahip flt Mr. C. V. ~ on • hMl Of the 

lattonal Seeur1ty Alr,.ency So1eut.1tio Adviat¢'1 Boe.rd.. 

tour otter to .- otbera ill 1"W' Corporation tor 

eonti&tra.tion u Puel ~ra 1a ~recated.. We ~ 

have oceoJ1tion to take adn,ntag& t4 your .-uggeation after 

the autUl?:ll ..,ting ar the Joe.l'4. 

l. '1'. )lcl)Of(ALO 

Oapt.t.in t.eAF 

.U.i1tant to Vill1ar.t t. 1'riedmn 

ccs NJ 

c/s aw& 

S/ABST (Mr. Fried.imn) 4t*W27 

M[R i Acknowledgment of' Mr. Booth ts letter of 15 July 1 54. ffe. :Booth had. previously recommended that Mr. Adam.a 

not be a Panel member. Mr. Ad.ams subsequently accepted 

Panel membership. Mr. Booth was queried. He restated 

Mr'" Ad.ams' unavailability and of'f'ered to name others 

tr0111 Philco vho would. be qualified :f'or Panel service J 

!. T. McDonald, Ce.ptain, ffi.AF/60493]23 July 547can 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-17-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

........ ____________ ~
ZOO ~ (Z609 ON TIi/XL) T!: ti NOW 600Zl~n/90 

# 2- -2-

ASHLAD.. Sameh F Eltomi

05/14/200909:43 PM To: mosley.brenda@epa.gov cc: harrigan-farrelly.joan@epa.gov, ross.philp@epa.gov, ross.philp@epa.gov, edwards.dennis@epa.gov,

KHansen@bdlaw.com, SHerman@bdlaw.com Subject: Enforcement Regarding Nalco Sales of Unregistered Industrial Biocides - Violation of Law Dear Ms. Mosley, Ashland is providing additional information regarding Nalco's sale of unregistered urea-based biocide 

### products to pulp and paper mils. This use requires FIFRA registration for industrial and pulp and paper applications, and should not have any linkage with drinking water issues. We again request that EPA require Nalco to cease and desist sales of its unregistered industrial biocides. By not doing so, EPA is 

### allowing serious ongoing safety, regulatory cOmpliance and level playing field Îssues to persist. Please see the attached letter for details on our position. Additionally, please find several pictures that document Nalco actions and a list of sites whereas Nalco Îs currently applying unregistered products in pulp and paper mils. Please let me know if you have any questions. Best regards, 

### SamEltomi 

# ~.



# ~ Atl.achmentA to Ashland Letter to EPA Re NALCO Sale of Unregistered Biocides lor Use in Pulp and Pap.PDF



# ~: Attachment B to Ashland letter t() EPA Re NALCO Sale of Unregistered Biocides for Use in Pulp and Pap.PDF



# ~.., 

# ~t Enforcement Nelca Sale of Unregistered Biocide-Violation of Law.pdf

$. Eltomi Ashland Hercules Water Technologies 

### seltomi@ashland.com 913-402-0934 (Telephone) 913.851.9072 (Fax) 913-645-6289 (Mobile)



### ~ -d 

# ~l.OS-lS8-ElS rWO"lI3 wes dg ~ : lOS 0 5 1 un r
-

REF ID:A63200 

Request tor ISA Quarter)¥ Property :Alas (llCS 364) 

Chiet, Security D1v1a1on Special Aaaiatant RS Max- 55 

lt ii reque•ted that a l8A. Quarter.1¥ Property Pua be i•aued to 

Willianl F. J'r1edman, 08-18, Speeial .Maiatant to the Director, BSA.1 

l!Jadge lumbar 7. Juat.it1cation tor paa1 i• the trequent atten&.nce o't 

Kr. Friedman to high level ••tia:lle on qeney :mattera in the Washington 

area. Highest cluaif'ication ot property or ateri&l to be hantlled would 

be 'l'OP SECBET Codeword.. 

-

;a:. r«>XTINE 

Ac!min. Aaa1at. to 

llpecial Alaiatant 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 06-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

------ ------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         134,744
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,944,755
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (291,663)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,817,770
<PP&E>                                          62,326
<DEPRECIATION>                                (18,234)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,915,862
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,684,582
<BONDS>                                      2,796,925
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    789,256
<COMMON>                                    40,844,296
<OTHER-SE>                                (45,199,211)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,915,862
<SALES>                                     15,207,988
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,207,988
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,815,092
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,099
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             329,339
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 79,656
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             79,656
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    79,656
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
»
Oe
oe
oo

a
bits

rt g i a

u
Bat TH
=
*

ctf is

af
HITE
4 i i i]

fel a
tHe

it
tid

Lt

Re

No Ngo)

«see ct
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 17-14998

________________________

Agency No. A209-230-480

SUKIRTHAN SINNARTHURI, 

 Petitioner,

versus

U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, 

 Respondent.

________________________

Petition for Review of a Decision of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

________________________

(August 8, 2019)

Before WILSON and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges, and COOGLER,

* District Judge.

PER CURIAM: 

* Honorable L. Scott Coogler, District Judge for the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of Alabama, sitting by designation.

Case: 17-14998 Date Filed: 08/08/2019 Page: 1 of 2 
2

The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirmed the denial of Sukirthan 

Sinnarthuri’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the 

Convention Against Torture (CAT). Sinnarthuri petitioned for review. While that 

petition was pending in this Court, the BIA granted Sinnarthuri’s motion to reopen 

his immigration proceedings based on new evidence. The government then filed a 

motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. While that motion was 

pending, an Immigration Judge (IJ) in the reopened proceedings granted 

Sinnarthuri’s petition for asylum under 8 U.S.C. § 1158. Sinnarthuri was 

subsequently released from detention. 

“If events that occur subsequent to the filing of a lawsuit or an appeal 

deprive the court of the ability to give the plaintiff or appellant meaningful relief, 

then the case is moot and must be dismissed.” Al Najjar v. Ashcroft, 273 F.3d 

1330, 1336 (11th Cir. 2001). Because the IJ in the reopened proceedings granted 

Sinnarthuri the precise relief he sought—asylum—this case “no longer presents a 

live controversy” over which we may exercise jurisdiction. Id. Accordingly, the 

appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 

DISMISSED.

Case: 17-14998 Date Filed: 08/08/2019 Page: 2 of 2
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 10.26

                               SECOND AMENDMENT TO
                    SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION RIGHTS AGREEMENT

Amendment No. 2 Dated as of September 30, 1998, between Ethicon, Inc,
("Ethicon"), a New Jersey corporation and Closure Medical Corporation (formerly
known as Tri Point Medical Corporation) ("Closure"), a Delaware corporation, to
that certain Supply and Distribution Rights Agreement dated as of March 20, 1996
between the parties.

                              Preliminary Statement
                              ---------------------

         Ethicon and Closure are parties to that certain Supply and Distribution
Rights Agreement dated as of March 20, 1996 (the "Supply Agreement") as amended
as of September 15, 1998. The parties desire to amend certain pricing terms and
otherwise to continue the Supply Agreement in effect in accordance with its
terms.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

         Section I Adjustments to Minimum Price. Paragraph B.3. of Article IV of
                   ----------------------------
the Supply Agreement is hereby amended by deleting such current paragraph and
inserting the following in lieu thereof:

         Notwithstanding the minimum purchase price of $** set out in Paragraph
B.1. above (the "Minimum Purchase Price"), in the event that **.

Section 2 Effect on Supply Agreement. Except as expressly amended by this
          --------------------------
Amendment No. 2, the Supply Agreement shall continue in full force and effect in
accordance with its terms and this Amendment No. 2 shall be subject to such
terms.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto by their duly authorized representatives
have executed and delivered this Amendment No. 2 as of the date first above
written.

ETHICON, INC.                          CLOSURE MEDICAL CORPORATION
By: /s/ FRANK RYAN                     By: /s/ ROBERT V. TONI
   -------------------------------         -------------------------------------
Name:  Frank Ryan                      Name: Robert V. Toni
Title: Company Group Chairman          Title: President and CEO
./ 

- - -f. -<t .:.:"w--,... ... ; ~ .. - l" 

\ .> I I e:: 0 

/ 

Mr~ V. JI. Von Senn 

fublleatiooa 

!'!» Ran4 C~po:ration 

1700 Main 8tnet 

luta Mmd.<».1 C&litond.e. 

l>ear Mr.. Van Sorms 

I 

aec.tpt or J'OUl" letter cl 5 Joved>er 1953 

with the ixlcl.08Ur'Et u aelmovledged. 

I nah w a;treea 'Ill' apprec1atton w JOU 

tor •etidha • \be MID Jtesearcb ~. 

1Utce:re:J¥ I 

ccs AG 

8 0 NOV 1953 

WILLIAM -, • JRIEtW.1' 

lpecial AH:latant 

C/S 

S/ASST (Mr. Friedl!le.n) 

M/R: Acknowledgement ot receipt or RAND Research 

Memoranda .from the Rand Corporation. 

FJ3Y.oung/S/ASST/6o493/30 Nov 53 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 06-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

~----~-----~--~=--- -- - --~~-~--
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2145
JOHN JETER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 99-15017) Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 6, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Jeter, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Farber, Marion Elizabeth Erickson, Patricia McDonald Bowman, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: John Jeter appeals from the tax court’s order upholding the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s determination of a deficiency in his 1997 personal income taxes. We have reviewed the record and the tax court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. Jeter v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue , No. 99-15017 (U.S.T.C. Aug. 14, 2001 & Sept. 5, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# CE2004078EN.01057301.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/573 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/573

---

(2004/C 78 E/0607)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3522/03

by Elly Plooij-van Gorsel (ELDR) to the Commission

(19 November 2003)

Subject:   Specific import tariffs on photographic products for the People's Republic of China

Subject:

In March 2003 I put a written question to the Commission on the import tariffs that the People's Republic of China is imposing on photographic products (E-1289/03 (1)).

1

In its answer to these questions the Commission includes the comment that the application of specific duties on photographic products in China has in several cases led to higher duties than the consolidated ad valorem rate. In response to this finding the Commission has raised the problem both bilaterally with the Chinese authorities and in the context of the WTO Transitional Review Mechanism. As a result the Chinese authorities have undertaken to make the Commission request the subject of a thorough investigation.

| 1. | Has the Commission yet received the results from the Chinese authorities? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Has the Commission yet received the results from the Chinese authorities?

| 2. | If not, what further steps has the Commission taken in this regard over the past six months to obtain the results concerned? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If not, what further steps has the Commission taken in this regard over the past six months to obtain the results concerned?

| 3. | What action is the Commission taking to enforce the application of the correct tariffs at the earliest possible time? |
| --- | --- |

3.

What action is the Commission taking to enforce the application of the correct tariffs at the earliest possible time?

Answer given by Mr Lamy on behalf of the Commission

(16 December 2003)

(16 December 2003)

The Commission took the action to which the Honourable Member refers as a result of the matter being raised with the Commission by the European industry in 2002. However, it has not contacted the Commission again since January 2003 when China introduced new tariffs.

No reference was made to the issue by the Member States consulted for the purpose of identifying the EU's priorities in trade with China, in particular as regards China's implementation of its commitments to the World Trade Organisation.

In view of the above and the many priority trade issues facing European businesses in China, the Commission has not prioritised this question.

The Commission would be grateful for any further details which the Honourable Member can provide in order to raise the matter again with the Chinese authorities.

The Commission has been informed that this matter is in fact a priority for Japan, whose industry has apparently suffered more than the EU's from the system of specific duties introduced by China.

---

(1)  See page 27.

1

---
Capt. Terry L. McVenes The Boeing Company
Director P.O. Box 3707, MC 07-30 Operational Regulatory Affairs Seattle, WA 98124-2207

May 17, 2011

B-H001-REG-11-TLM-34

Ms. Margaret Gilligan

Federal Aviation Administration Office of Aviation Safety, AVS-1 800 Independence Avenue SW. Washington, DC 20591

Ms. Rebecca MacPherson

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Chief Counsel Regulations Division, AGC-200 800 Independence Avenue SW. Washington, DC 20591

Subject: Request for extension of the comment period for FAA Proposed Airworthiness Directive Legal Interpretation

Reference: Proposed legal interpretation published in the Federal Register on April 14, 2011 (72 FR 20898); Docket No. FAA-2010-1167

Dear Ms. Gilligan and Ms. MacPherson,

On behalf of the industry members of the Airworthiness Directive Implementation Aviation Rulemaking Committee (AD ARC), I am respectfully requesting that the FAA extend the comment period for the subject proposed legal interpretation until June 30, 2011 The AD ARC is nearing the completion of its intensive, two-year effort to resolve issues that arise with ADs and we are anticipating several noteworthy improvements, several of which may be affected by the proposed legal interpretation.

Although the AD ARC had expected the FAA to provide an interpretation, we now find that the scope and extent of the actual proposal is such that we require more time to perform further analysis and evaluate the ramifications of this interpretation to the ARC implementation activities.

Additional time is needed not only for the AD ARC to accomplish its review, but also other manufacturers, operators, maintenance organizations, and individual aircraft owner operators directly affected by the proposal. Consequently, we ask that the date be
extended to June 30, 2011Letter B-H001-REG-11-TLM-34 Page 2

We look forward to a positive response to this request so that we can more effectively participate in the development of this important guidance material.

Sincerely,

Terry L. McVenes Co-Chair, AD Implementation ARC

cc: U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M-30

Docket No. FAA-2010-1167 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. Room W12-140, West Building Ground Floor Washington, DC 20590-0001

Mr. John King

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Chief Counsel Regulations Division 800 Independence Avenue, SW. Washington, DC 20591
Order entered April 7 , 2015

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00994

- CR

JERRY ALLAN MIKROBER TS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12

- 62918

- T



### O RDER

T he Court GRANTS appellant’s April 6, 2015 motion to extend time to file his brief. We

ORDER the appellant’s brief on April 6, 2015 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
# • RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 17 I Ground·Water Monitoring STATE ANALOG IS: FEDERAL ANALOGOUS MORE BROADFEDERAL RCRA STATE EQUIV­ STRIN­ ER IN REQUIREMENT CITATION CITATION ALENT GENT SCOPE PART 264 - STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT. STORAGE. AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES WAC 173-303
SUBPART F - RELEASES FROM SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS
APPLICABI LITV o 

### t exerrptions 264.90Cb) 645(1)(b) 

### x SUBPART K - SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
DOUBLE-LINED SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS: EXEMPTION FROM SUBPART F 

# • section removed MONITORING AND INSPECTION oLd 264,226Cb)C3) removed; 264.226Cb)C4) redesignated as 264.226Cb)(3) 264.222

264.226Cb)(3) 650(3)

650(4)(b)(i i i) X

X CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE CARE oLd 264.228Cb)C2) removed; 264.228Cb)C3) and (4) redesignated as 264.228Cb)(2) and (3) 264.228(b)(2) 650(6)(bHi i) X section removed 264.228Cd) removed [650(6)Cd)] X SUBPART L - WASTE PILES
DOUBLE'LINED PILES: EXEMPTION FROM SUBPART F section removed 264.252 removed [660(3)] X . INSPECTION OF LINERS: EXEMPTION FROM SUBPART F 

# • section removed 264.253 removed [660(4)] X
JUly**15~** 1985 - Page 13 of 25RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 17I: Ground-Water Monitoring (conrd)

FEDERAL REQUIREMENT FEDERAL RCRA CITATION ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION STATEANALOG IS: MORE EQUIV- STRINALENT GENT BROADERIN SCOPE MONITORING AND INSPECTION old264.254(b)(2) removed; 264.254(b)(3)

.and (4) redesignated as264.254(b)(2) and (3) 264.254(b)(2) 660(5Xb)(ii) 

## x SUBPART N-LANDFillS
DOUBLE-lINED LANDFILLS: EXEMPTIONS FROM SUBPART F section removed 264.302 removed[665(3H X MONITORING AND INSPECTION remove old paragraph**~64.303(b)(2);** redesignate 264.303(b)(3) and· .(4)as264.303{b)(2)

. and (3) 264.303(b)(2) 665(4)(b )(jj) X 

# 0
CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE CARE remove old paragraph 264.310(b)(2); redesignate 264.310(b)(3), (4) and (5)as264.31O(b) (2). (3) and (4) 264.310(bU2) 665f6Ub)(ii)
. X subsection removed 264.310(c) removed[665(6)(cH X



# o July 15, 1985 - Page 14of25 _
... 

USCIB: 29.11/15 

18 February 1955 

SEiSREi' EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Prospectuses of Cryptanalytic Training .... I __ ___.I· 

USCIB 29.11/13 of 1 February 1955. 

1. Vote sheet responses to the reference were all in the nature of 

approval. In addition several members favored.preparation of a prospectus along T/A lines and none expressed 'ri.ews against such action. 

Specific recommendations were as follows: 

STATE: 

11I suggest that NSA proceed/to the preparation of a prospectus 

for T/A training materials./with the understanding that it will 

not be given to thel lunless specifically requested by them 

and agreed by USCIB and LSIB. 11 (Secret) 

DEFENSE: 

"Defense desire that the Director, NSA proceed with the preparation of traffic analysis prospectuses. 11 (Confidential) 

AIR FORCE: 

CIA: 

"It is desired that the Director, NSA, prepare a prospeD approved T/A training courses suitable for release. to th·. 1 

(Confiden ia 

"It is noted that the proposed cryptanalytic training prospectuses are elementary in nature. It is therefore suggested that 

the Director, National Security Agency, consider the feasibility of preparing the proposed prospectus for T/A training at 

a somewhat more advanced level. 11 (Confidential) 

2. Accordingly the reference stands approved and the Director, NSA 

should proceed with the preparation of the suggested T/A prospectus. 

3. It is noted that the Assistant C/S G-2, D/A, did not comment on 

the releasability of TM 32-220. If' this has not already been done by other 

USCIB: 29 .11/15 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-23-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

SECRET 
' .. .. EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

USCIB: 29.11/15 

SESR!ff 

lS February\1955 

Subject: Prospectuses of Cryptanalytic Training I .... ___ _, 

means, it is suggested that the comment requested be :forwarded separately 

and directly to the Director, National Security Agency with a copy for 

file to the Executive Secretary, USCIB. 

USCIB: 29.11/15 - 2 -

SECRET 

•