alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Jackpot's
Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 1995 and June 30, 1995 and its
Consolidated Statements of Income - three and six months ended December 31, 
1995 and 1994 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          36,425
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,439
<PP&E>                                          36,084
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,947
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,431
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,370
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            96
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,431
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,185
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,837
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,938
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  22
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,402
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,729
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,673
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39
        

</TABLE>
NRO Joins Effort To Develop RadiationHardened Chip

8 December 1998

The National Reconnaissance Office has joined a partnership with the Air Force Research Lab, 

NASA, the Department of Energy and Intel Corporation to develop a radiation-hardened 

computer chip. 

"This is another example of the NRO working to push the technology envelope while working 

with our partners in government and industry to do so more efficiently and cost effectively," said 

Mr. Keith Hall, Director of the NRO and Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Space. 

The NRO designs, builds and operates the nation's reconnaissance satellites. The organization 

has participated in a number of new technology efforts, the most recent being the October launch 

of its Space Technology Experiment satellite, which is testing 29 high potential advanced 

technologies for use in space. The NRO has also increased its research and development budget 

from four to eight percent over the last four years.
REF ID:A67084 

r' ~ 

Qonferei1ce Offacgs. 10 Carl ton Ho1 1se Terrace , 

All telephone extensions are on the Carlton House Terrace switchboard 

(located in 6 Carlton House Terrace). 

The Post Office telephJne nwriber of tlus board is WHITE!f.ALL 4341 and. it is 

also connected to the ma1.n Foreign Office board and. through this to Cheltenham, 

Palmer Street, War Office, Admiralty, Air M1n1str,y etc. 

The Carlton Houst:: Tc.rracc switchboard is open from.0830 to 1900 daily, 

except Satur1ays, 0830 to 1330 and Sundays when J.~ J.~ closed. 1 'henever the board 1s closea the extension in the Security Of 'ice at 

the front door is on ·~'Hil'".f:HALL 7436. I~ollowing 1s a li&t of extensions: ~tension ,fQQm 

Vf. Park Armstrong (Head of US Delegation) 17 

"q. li'. Packard 

H.D. Jones (Secretary US Delegation) 

W.F. Friedman 

J B. Ackcnna.n 

B.K Buf f'ham 

J.R. Dc..'1Ilis 

J.L. Holmes 

F B. Rowlett 

J.P K&.ylor 

1. S.J. Curley 

B.c. Pulling 

Vf.F. Zeller 

Spare US Room 

Spa.re US Feiom 

OGA 

17 

30 

16 

18 

14 

13 

13 

12 or 16 

12 or 16 

12or 16 

29 

29 

32 

32 

23 

5,11 or 19 

20 

20 

20 .' 

21 

25 

24 or 31 

2L or 31 

22 

22 ' 

22 

SE..C"1.1ri ty Of fie c 28 

(~lus office also has night service on \i1!ITEHALL\7436) 

26 

26 

24 

25 

25 

23 

22 

2.::: 

21 

21 

21 

17 

17 

16 

16 

15 

23 

12 

12 

12 

,01 

05 

02 

02 

03 

03 

03 

(Front door) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 10-21 2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
REF ID:A67084 

DISTRIBUTION 

COPY NO. 

iv. PJ.RK .nRMSTRONG 1 

J.B. .tiCKERM..-ili' 2 

F.B. RO 1LETT 3 

J.R. DENNIS 4 

J.P. KuYIDR 5 

'".S.J. CURLEY 6 

R. F. Pl..CK.i'JID 7 

W. F. FRIEDMi.iN 8 

B.K. BUF.F:It.M 9 

B.S. PULLING· 10 

11 

// 

12 

J.L. HOLMES 13 

H.D. JONES 14 

·.y. F. ZELLER 15 PL 86-36/50 use 3605 

• I 

OGA
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of PSI Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2010 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: February 8, 2011



/s/

Eric L. Kash





---
EXHIBIT
32.2





PSI
CORPORATION


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Eric
Kash, the Chief Financial Officer of PSI Corporation (the "Company"), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








Date:
      October 28, 2008
                By:
                /s/ Eric KashEric KashChief
      Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1066

ELITO MARIKE SANTOS MENDES,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted: June 27, 2023 Decided: July 25, 2023

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elito Marike Santos Mendes, Appellant Pro Se. Duncan Thomas Fulton, Office of 

Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, 

D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1066 Doc: 24 Filed: 07/25/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Elito Marike Santos Mendes, a native and citizen of Cape Verde, petitions for 

review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his untimely 

appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his application for deferral of removal under 

the Convention Against Torture and denying to consider the appeal by certification. This 

Court lacks jurisdiction to review the Board’s discretionary decision not to certify an 

appeal. See Idrees v. Barr, 923 F.3d 539, 542-43 (9th Cir. 2019) (holding that the decision 

of whether to certify a claim is committed to agency’s discretion and not reviewable). 

Because Mendes did not timely appeal, his remaining claims are unexhausted and will not 

be considered by this court. See Poole v. Mukasey, 522 F.3d 259, 264 (2d Cir. 2008)

(joining other circuits to hold that a late appeal to the Board leaves a petitioner’s claim 

unexhausted). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review. We deny Mendes’ motions 

for appointment of counsel and to submit additional evidence. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

submissions before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1066 Doc: 24 Filed: 07/25/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 7, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-0092 Lower Tribunal Nos. 20-0023 AP & 19-14886 CC

________________ 

### Dauce Pozo , Appellant, vs. 

### Shell Lumber Recovery Trust, etc. ,

Appellee. An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Luis Perez-Medina, Judge. Solnick Law, P.A., and Peter J. Solnick, for appellant. Roniel Rodriguez IV, P.A., and Roniel Rodriguez, IV, for appellee. Before EMAS, LINDSEY, and GORDO, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1805 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to provide 

flexibility to school food authorities in establishing a price for paid 

school lunches. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 21, 2015 

Mr. INHOFE (for himself and Mr. KING) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, 

and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 

Act to provide flexibility to school food authorities in 

establishing a price for paid school lunches. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘School Lunch Price 

5 Protection Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PAID LUNCHES. 

7 Section 12(p) of the Richard B. Russell National 

8 School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1760(p)) is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (2)— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1805 IS

1 (A) by striking subparagraph (A) and in2 serting the following: 

3 ‘‘(A) REQUIREMENT.—For each school 

4 year beginning on or after July 1, 2015, each 

5 school food authority that had a negative bal6 ance of funds in the nonprofit school food serv7 ice account of the school food authority for the 

8 previous school year shall establish a price for 

9 paid lunches in accordance with this sub10 section.’’; 

11 (B) in subparagraph (B)(i), by inserting 

12 ‘‘described in subparagraph (A)’’ after ‘‘author13 ity’’; and 

14 (C) in subparagraph (C)(i), by inserting 

15 ‘‘described in subparagraph (A)’’ after ‘‘author16 ity’’; and 

17 (2) in paragraph (3)(A), by inserting ‘‘described 

18 in paragraph (2)(A)’’ after ‘‘authority’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

Whalen, Marilyn

From: Gilmore Ching <globalbiosciencesllc@gmail.com>

Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 1:45 PM

To: RedHill; Gadicesare; Rob Schippers; Stanforde Sagum; Alan Towner; W

Subject: AOC and realistic solutions to this ongoing issue

Attachments: GBS Capability Statement Revised (2).pdf; GBS Letter Head with GBS Synopsis revised.doc; 

GBS Summary slide_Presentation_-_GBS-PPT_May_2015_ revised.pptx; North Wind 

Construction Services Revised Response to RFI SOL-R9-14-00001_072514.docx

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

Aloha EPA, Hawaii DOH and Navy DLA: 

I represent GBS Global BioSciences LLC as CEO and as a concerned citizen who born and raised and still have 

residence here on Oahu. 

Understanding how difficult it is to juggle public health and safety in conjunction with our country's defense, I 

want to state, that the key to any difficult undertaking should be built on dialogue. I believe it is everyone's 

desire to place priorities on the public's safety and health, especially when it comes to such a valuable and 

irreplaceable resources as potable water. 

I have offered practical and proven solutions to all parties involved, and will again attach in this letter the details 

of a very integral part of the problem with is "groundwater contamination". 

Due to the bad and inadequate record keeping done on the "largest UST fuel facility in the world" it is no 

wonder, that the public, BWS and many political elements (who represent the people) are up and arms. This is 

not only a grossly serious and scary scenario but it may become a catastrophic stark reality. None of the 

responsible parties seem to know where and how much of these toxic fuels have already leaked and is showing 

up in the very few monitoring wells at very high levels 80' below the tanks already! 

So for the record, I have given my proposals and even and RFI (attached to Region 9 EPA) to the Navy, DOH 

and the state and federal government with no response to date. This is very alarming and very sad. 

I urge you to please take a look at possibly, the only effect and viable solution to resolve the problem of ground 

water contamination covered under section 6 of your proposed AOC and show proof to the public, that you can 

"ACTUALLY" take contaminated chemicals out of ground water and that you actually have a working process 

that can effectively do that. 

A small pilot with minimal financial risk can be done with measured and proven results. This will take tons of 

pressure off your back and help you get back public confidence, as well as your abilities to do your job 

effectively and competently as "public servants". 

Mahalo, Gilmore Ching 

www.globalbiosciences.org

(808) 542-8419
Request additional information for F.S. Air Service request to amend Exemption 7779A From: Stephen Happenny ANM-112, Propulsion & Mechanical Systems

To: LMason3661@aol.com

Cc: Mark Forseth

10/11/2011 02:56 PM

Hello Mr. Mason, In reviewing your request to amend F.S. Air Service Inc Exemption 7779A, I am requesting the following information:

(a) The environmental control system for the CASA 212 Aviocar Model C-212-CC & - CD and the model C-212-DF. Are they the same (i.e., same bleed extraction, same ventilation airflow; same temperature and pr essure schedule across the airplane operating envelope; same internal flow characteristics, etc.)?

(b) The airplane performance for the CA SA 212 Aviocar Model C-212-CC & -CD and the model C-212-DF. Are they the same (i.e., same maximum and minimum operating altitudes, airplane cruise speed, clim b and descent performance, etc)?

This information will enable me to complete the technical review of the airplanes and proceed with processing your request to amend Exemption 7779A.

Regards, Steve Happenny Aerospace Engineer Environmental Control Systems & Fire Protection Systems ANM-112 Mechanical Systems FAA Transport Airplane Directorate

Phone: 425-227-2147

FAX: 425-227-1320 e-mail: stephen.happenny@faa.gov
American Lorain Corporation: Exhibit 10.22 - Prepared by TNT Filings Inc.




  




Exhibit 10.22


Shandong Lvan Import & Export Co., Ltd.

WEI FANG OFFICE

Sales Contract


Seller: Shandong Lorain Foodstuff Co., Ltd


Buyer: Shandong Lvan Import & Export Co., Ltd.


The Seller and Buyer have agreed to close the following transactions according to the terms and conditions stipulated as below:


I. Variety, spec, quantity, and price of the product

	
  
  Variety

	
  
  Spec

	
  
  Quantity

	
  
  Price

	
  
  Quality requirement


	  

   
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 



II. Sales details of Buyer.

	
  
  Variety

	
  
  Target Customer

	
  
  Sales Quantity

	
  
  Sales Period

	
  
  Sales Price

	
  
  Net income


	 	 	 	 	 	 



III. The Seller supplies goods to the Buyer in accordance with the varieties, spec, quantity and quality requirements stated in above I. After the goods arrive at the designated location, the buyer will check the goods based on the requirement set forth in aboveI. If there are any quality problems, the buyer has the right to return the goods. Any loss caused by the return will be borne by the seller.
 


IV. Delivery: The seller is responsible for the delivery of the goods to the location of the buyer or the designated location by the buyer before [_____]. The costs are for the account of buyer.


V. Payment: The buyer assures to transfer the money of the products to the seller’s account before [______]. If the buyer cannot transfer the money within the specified time, the seller has the right to charge the fine equals to 0.5% of the overdue money daily.
 


VI. Anything not covered in this contract will be discussed separately by both parties.


VII. This agreement is in duplicate. Part A and Part B each have one copy. This Contract shall come into effect after signature by the both parties. The facsimile and original contract will have the same legal force.
 


Seller: Shandong Lorain Foodstuff Co., Ltd.    Buyer: Shandong Lvan Import & Export Co., Ltd.


WEI FANG OFFICE Zhuang Wentao

	
Date:  	
Date:
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

MONAHAN, CRISFIELD, and LAWRENCE

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Dachner ST. VILUS

Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

No. 202000118

Decided: 21 September 2020

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge:

Ray B. Slabbekorn

Sentence adjudged 21 February 2020 by a general court-martial 

convened at Camp Foster, Okinawa, Japan, consisting of a military 

judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: confinement 

for 18 months, reduction to E-1, and a dishonorable discharge.

For Appellant: 

Lieutenant Colonel Michael D. Berry, USMCR

For Appellee:

Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
United States v. St. Vilus, NMCCA No. 202000118

Opinion of the Court

2

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial 

rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. 

§§ 859, 866. 

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court
#### Kuhnel and another, Respondents, vs. Bierbrauer, Appellant.

*May 11*

June *10, 1904.*

*Bierbrauer v. Kuhnel, ante*p. 306, followed.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Polk county: A. J. ViNje, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of 17. *L.*Severance, and for the respondents on that of *Frank B. Dorothy.*

WiNslow, J.

This is a companion case with the case of *Bierbrauer v.*Kuhnel, *ante,*p. 306, 99 N. W. 1018, and was tried and decided upon the same evidence. The action was brought to recover back certain payments which the plaintiffs had made to the defendant upon the well-drilling contract involved in the other case during the progress of the drilling, on the ground of entire failure of consideration. The findings as to the failure to complete the well and the fact that it was of no value were the same in the present case as in the other case, and judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs for the recovery back of said payments. The parties stipulated in writing that if the other case be affirmed on the merits this case should also be affirmed. The judgment in the present case must therefore be affirmed.

*By the Court.*— It is so ordered.
Exhibit
10.2


 


AMENDMENT
TO LETTER AGREEMENT


 


September 12,
2008


 


Reference is made to the
Letter Agreement dated October 31, 2005 between Veeco Instruments Inc. and
Robert P. Oates (the “Letter Agreement”).


 


In connection with the
designation of Mr. Oates as an eligible employee under Veeco’s Senior
Executive Change in Control Policy, in the form presented and effective on the
date hereof, the parties agree as follows:


 


The Letter Agreement is
hereby amended by deleting the definition of “Good Reason” and substituting
therefor the following:


 


“Good Reason” shall mean (a) a reduction
of your base salary, other than as part of a salary reduction program affecting
management employees generally, (b) a material reduction in the total
benefits available to you under cash incentive, stock incentive and other
employee benefit plans, other than as part of a reduction in incentives or
benefits  affecting similarly situated
employees, generally, or (c) the relocation of your primary place of work
by more than 50 miles (it being understood that your decision not to relocate
would not be a basis for Termination for Cause).


 


 


	
  Veeco Instruments Inc.

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  Authorized Signatory

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Robert P. Oates

  
	
  Name:

  	
   

  	
  Robert P. Oates

  
	
  Title:
J

ioe . DEC?  s55
SUBJECT: Distribution of Reports for tS 117L .
TOs “Ramo-tiooldridge Corporation a

ttn: Mr. F. A. Ford . . \
1, The purpose of this letter is to formalise the report sl :
handling procedure in order to effect a minimm tranoittal rs —- : |
“DD DOI 12-7 will be adhered to. i

2. Official ormaticn generatoc
within and/or for the lano-1i ge tion iS 117L Group
Will be dintribsted on a KiD/R-: Wsctribution list. .

Zt ehali be required that prior to any Siew of VS 1I7L
fornatien as dafinod hercin, coorStm=ttaf will Le Dectedaat
EDSIT ard \DM. It is furtier requested that ths/ta Pricrim”’ cise
trikotion List become part of the docuznt repr ree
presucc< copies of 1S 1171 infornction will to suindtted to iDSIi.
Thora cccumcnts as cuecificd 4n the distribution list for }:4i will

be rent to Re! by LGTY *en bloc.” Distributden of the ;
Gcommmts will be mde by WSI? as epproved by \DT:. This pro-

cccure docs not ay.27 to Rei interncl notes or nemoranda, unless
accensunied by an officiel Ictter of tranceiti: signed by sonvone

tho can certify tct the informaticn represent: vio Corporation's
Tics.

30 Inclesure 1 includes the distribution required by \DTh.
A ctandsrd distribution List for accropriate personnel. within Rei ;
uo will receive all such reports, should be supplicd to iDSIT :
through LDTR for aporcval. ' ”

4, Toperts, mesoranda, cnd/or inforantion frex other Air
Fores contractors, but dosed applicable and of use to ES 1171
by Rei chall.be handled in the following sumer:

a Sond o request to LDSIT requesting that a given re=
Port (defined in scfficient detail in the request) be sent te
Lockheed Aircraft Corporation, I!icsile Systems Division.

bs WSIT will get the roquired mmber of copics of tha
dccuncnt and prepare for distribution to Lockhoed.

Ge WDSI? will coordinate with WDTR for &pproval prior
to trencmission. . “y



yO 2)

5. Three (3) cepics ef docunc:.ts roferzcd te in paragraph
4 vill be sont to Lockhood Lircraft Corporution, #issile Syctuxs
Division, Attns lr. Robert Salter, PC. Box Sol, Sunnyvale,
California

SIGNED

1 Incl: ; FRIDERIC C. &. OLR *-
Distribution List Lt. Colonel, USéF
of Rev Eeports . Assistant for uS 117L

required by :DTR , Technical Opsrations