11396 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 41 / Tuesday, March 3, 2015 / Notices 

1See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Hand 

Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof From the People’s 

Republic of China, 69 FR 70122 (December 2, 2004) 

(Order). 

2 Id. 

3See Petitioners’ submission, ‘‘Hand Trucks and 

Certain Parts Thereof From the People’s Republic of 

China: Petitioner’s Statement That It Has No 

Interest In the WORX Aerocart Being Subject to the 

Order,’’ dated December 10, 2014 at 1. 

4See Positec’s submission, ‘‘Changed 

Circumstances Review—Modification Antidumping 

Duty Order on Hand Trucks and Certain Parts 

Thereof From the People’s Republic of China,’’ 

dated 1/30/2015. 

5See Petitioners’ submission, ‘‘Hand Trucks and 

Certain Parts Thereof From the People’s Republic of 

China: Petitioner’s Statement That It Has No 

Interest In the WORX Aerocart Being Subject to the 

Order,’’ dated February 2, 2015. 

6See Positec’s submission, ‘‘Changed 

Circumstances Review—Modification Antidumping 

Duty Order on Hand Trucks and Certain Parts 

Thereof From the People’s Republic of China,’’ 

dated February 12, 2015. 

Dated: February 23, 2015. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2015–04393 Filed 3–2–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[S–001–2015] 

Approval of Subzone Status; Red Wing 

Shoe Company; Salt Lake City, Utah 

On January 8, 2015, the Executive 

Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones 

(FTZ) Board docketed an application 

submitted by the Salt Lake City 

Corporation, grantee of FTZ 30, 

requesting subzone status subject to the 

existing activation limit of FTZ 30, on 

behalf of Red Wing Shoe Company, Inc., 

in Salt Lake City, Utah. 

The application was processed in 

accordance with the FTZ Act and 

Regulations, including notice in the 

Federal Register inviting public 

comment (80 FR 1894, 01/14/2015). The 

FTZ staff examiner reviewed the 

application and determined that it 

meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant 

to the authority delegated to the FTZ 

Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR 

400.36(f)), the application to establish 

Subzone 30A is approved, subject to the 

FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, 

including section 400.13, and further 

subject to FTZ 30’s 55-acre activation 

limit. 

Dated: February 25, 2015. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2015–04390 Filed 3–2–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–891] 

Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Initiation and Preliminary Results of 

Changed Circumstances Review, and 

Intent To Revoke Order In Part 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In response to a request by 

Positec USA, Inc., and RQ Direct, Inc. 

(collectively, Positec), and pursuant to 

section 751(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 

351.216 and 351.221(c)(3)(ii), the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) is initiating a changed 

circumstances review (CCR) of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on hand 

trucks and certain parts thereof (hand 

trucks) from the People’s Republic of 

China (PRC). Based on the information 

received, we preliminarily intend to 

revoke, in part, the Order.1 Interested 

parties are invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 1, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Scott Hoefke, or Robert James, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4947 or (202) 482– 

0649, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 2, 2004, the Department 

published in the Federal Register the 

AD order on hand trucks from the PRC.2

On December 9, 2014, in accordance 

with sections 751(b) and 751(d)(1) of the 

Act, 19 CFR 351.216(b), and 19 CFR 

351.222(g)(1), Positec, an interested 

party, requested revocation, in part, of 

the Order with respect to its WORX 

Aerocart (Aerocart) as part of a changed 

circumstances review. Positec requested 

that the Department conduct the 

changed circumstances review on an 

expedited basis pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(3)(ii). On December 10, 2014, 

Gleason Industrial Products, Inc. and 

Precision Products, Inc. (collectively, 

Petitioners) submitted a statement 

asserting that Petitioners have no 

interest in the patented and 

trademarked product known as the 

WORX Aerocart being subject to the 

Order.3 On January 30, 2015, Positec 

clarified the language for revoking the 

Order, in part, with respect to Aerocart 

for this changed circumstances review.4

On February 2, 2015, Petitioners 

assented to the revised description.5 On 

February 12, 2015, Positec, in 

consultation with Petitioners, further 

modified the language for revoking the 

Order, in part, with respect to Aerocart 

for this changed circumstance review.6

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to this AD 

order consists of hand trucks 

manufactured from any material, 

whether assembled or unassembled, 

complete or incomplete, suitable for any 

use, and certain parts thereof, namely 

the vertical frame, the handling area and 

the projecting edges or toe plate, and 

any combination thereof. 

A complete or fully assembled hand 

truck is a hand-propelled barrow 

consisting of a vertically disposed frame 

having a handle or more than one 

handle at or near the upper section of 

the vertical frame; at least two wheels at 

or near the lower section of the vertical 

frame; and a horizontal projecting edge 

or edges, or toe plate, perpendicular or 

angled to the vertical frame, at or near 

the lower section of the vertical frame. 

The projecting edge or edges, or toe 

plate, slides under a load for purposes 

of lifting and/or moving the load. 

That the vertical frame can be 

converted from a vertical setting to a 

horizontal setting, then operated in that 

horizontal setting as a platform, is not 

a basis for exclusion of the hand truck 

from the scope of this petition. That the 

vertical frame, handling area, wheels, 

projecting edges or other parts of the 

hand truck can be collapsed or folded is 

not a basis for exclusion of the hand 

truck from the scope of the petition. 

That other wheels may be connected to 

the vertical frame, handling area, 

projecting edges, or other parts of the 

hand truck, in addition to the two or 

more wheels located at or near the lower 

section of the vertical frame, is not a 

basis for exclusion of the hand truck 

from the scope of the petition. Finally, 

that the hand truck may exhibit physical 

characteristics in addition to the vertical 

frame, the handling area, the projecting 

edges or toe plate, and the two wheels 

at or near the lower section of the 

vertical frame, is not a basis for 

exclusion of the hand truck from the 

scope of the petition. 

Examples of names commonly used to 

reference hand trucks are hand truck, 

convertible hand truck, appliance hand 

truck, cylinder hand truck, bag truck, 

dolly, or hand trolley. They are typically 

imported under heading 8716.80.5010 

of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 41 / Tuesday, March 3, 2015 / Notices 11397 

7See Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof 

From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011– 

2012, 79 FR 44008 (July 29, 2014). 

8See 19 CFR 351.303 for general filing 

requirements. 

9On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and 

Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic 

Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to AD and CVD 

Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). 

The Web site location was changed from http://

iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The 

Final Rule changing the references to the 

Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 

(November 20, 2014). 

the United States (HTSUS), although 

they may also be imported under 

heading 8716.80.5090. Specific parts of 

a hand truck, namely the vertical frame, 

the handling area and the projecting 

edges or toe plate, or any combination 

thereof, are typically imported under 

heading 8716.90.5060 of the HTSUS. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the Department’s written 

description of the scope is dispositive. 

Excluded from the scope are small 

two-wheel or four-wheel utility carts 

specifically designed for carrying loads 

like personal bags or luggage in which 

the frame is made from telescoping 

tubular material measuring less than 5⁄8

inch in diameter; hand trucks that use 

motorized operations either to move the 

hand truck from one location to the next 

or to assist in the lifting of items placed 

on the hand truck; vertical carriers 

designed specifically to transport golf 

bags; and wheels and tires used in the 

manufacture of hand trucks. 

Initiation and Preliminary Results of 

Changed Circumstances Review 

Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the 

Act, the Department will conduct a 

changed circumstances review upon 

receipt of information concerning, or a 

request from an interested party for a 

review of, a final affirmative 

determination that resulted in an AD 

order which shows changed 

circumstances sufficient to warrant a 

review. Section 782(h)(2) of the Act and 

19 CFR 351.222(g)(1)(i) provide that the 

Department may revoke an order (in 

whole or in part) if it determines that 

producers accounting for substantially 

all of the production of the domestic 

like product have expressed a lack of 

interest in the order, in whole or in part. 

In addition, in the event the Department 

determines that expedited action is 

warranted, 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii) 

permits the Department to combine the 

notices of initiation and preliminary 

results. 

On December 9, 2014, Positec 

requested the Department conduct a 

changed circumstances review on an 

expedited basis. On December 10, 2014, 

Petitioners filed a letter stating that they 

did not oppose partial revocation of the 

Order that is limited to Positec’s 

Aerocart. Petitioners claimed that they 

are producers accounting for 

substantially all of the production of the 

domestic like product and they have no 

interest in Positec’s Aerocart being 

subject to the scope of the Order. On 

January 30, 2015, Positec clarified the 

description of the Aerocart for purposes 

of this changed circumstances review. 

On February 2, 2015, Petitioners 

assented to the revised description. On 

February 12, 2015, Positec, in 

consultation with Petitioners, further 

modified the exclusionary language of 

the Aerocart for purposes of this 

changed circumstances review. 

Therefore, at the request of Positec 

and in accordance with sections 

751(b)(1) and 751(d)(1) of the Act, 19 

CFR 351.216, and 19 CFR 351.222(g)(1), 

we are initiating this changed 

circumstances review of hand trucks to 

determine whether partial revocation of 

the Order is warranted with respect to 

this product. In addition, pursuant to 19 

CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii), we determine that 

expedited action is warranted. 

We find that Petitioners’ affirmative 

statement of no interest constitutes a 

reasonable basis for the conduct of this 

review. Additionally, our decision to 

expedite this review pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(3)(ii) stems from the 

domestic industry’s lack of interest in 

application of the Order to Positec’s 

Aerocart. 

Based on the expression of no interest 

by Petitioners, and absent any 

objections by other domestic interested 

parties, we preliminarily determine that 

substantially all of the domestic 

producers have no interest in the 

continued application of the Order on 

hand trucks from the PRC to the 

merchandise that is subject to Positec’s 

request. Therefore, we are notifying the 

public of our intent to revoke, in part, 

the Order as it relates to imports of 

Positec’s Aerocart. If we make a final 

determination to revoke the Order in 

part, this partial revocation will be 

retroactively applied to entries of 

Positec’s Aerocart entered or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption, on or 

after December 1, 2012, which 

corresponds to the day following the 

last day of the most recently completed 

administrative review under the order.7

We intend to modify the scope of the 

AD order to add the following: 

Excluded from the scope of the order is a 

multifunction cart that combines, among 

others, the capabilities of a wheelbarrow and 

dolly. The product comprises a steel frame 

than can be converted from vertical to 

horizontal functionality, two wheels toward 

the lower end of the frame and two 

removable handles near the top. In addition 

to a foldable projection edge in its extended 

position, it includes a permanently attached 

steel tub or barrow. This product is currently 

available under proprietary trade names such 

as the ‘Aerocart’. 

Public Comment 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

Written comments may be submitted no 

later than 14 days after the publication 

of this notice. Rebuttals to written 

comments, limited to issues raised in 

such comments, may be filed no later 

than 21 days after the date of 

publication of this notice. Consistent 

with 19 CFR 351.309, parties who 

submit written comments or rebuttal 

comments in this changed 

circumstances review are requested to 

submit with each argument: (1) A 

statement of the issue; (2) a brief 

summary of the argument; and (3) a 

table of authorities. Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.310(c), any interested party may 

request a hearing within 10 days after 

publication of this notice.8 Further, any 

hearing, if requested, will be held no 

later than 25 days after the date of 

publication of this notice, or the first 

business day thereafter. Parties will be 

notified of the time and date of any 

hearing if requested. All written 

comments and/or hearing requests must 

be filed electronically using 

Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS).9 ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. An electronically-filed 

document must be received successfully 

in its entirety by the Department’s 

electronic records system, ACCESS, by 

5 p.m. Eastern Time on the date the 

document is due. 

We intend to issue our final results of 

this changed circumstances review not 

later than 270 days after the date on 

which we initiated the changed 

circumstances review or within 45 days 

if all parties agree to our preliminary 

results, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.216(e). 

If final revocation, in part, occurs, we 

will instruct U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection to end the suspension of 

liquidation for the merchandise covered 

by the revocation on the effective date 

of the notice of revocation and to release 

any cash deposit or bond. The current 

requirement for a cash deposit of 

estimated AD duties on all subject 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

11398 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 41 / Tuesday, March 3, 2015 / Notices 

merchandise will continue unless and 

until it is modified pursuant to the final 

results of this changed circumstances 

review. 

This initiation, preliminary results of 

review and notice are published in 

accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216, 

351.221(b)(1) and (4), and 351.222(g). 

Dated: February 23, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2015–04279 Filed 3–2–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

RIN 0648–XD739 

Fisheries Off West Coast States and in 

the Western Pacific; Pacific Coast 

Groundfish Fishery; Application for an 

Exempted Fishing Permit (EFP) 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice; receipt of EFP 

applications; request for comments. 

SUMMARY: NMFS announces the receipt 

of an exempted fishing permit (EFP) 

application for 2015 and 2016 that 

would continue work done in 2013 and 

2014, and is considering issuance of 

EFPs for vessels participating in the EFP 

fishery. The EFPs are necessary to allow 

activities that are otherwise prohibited 

by Federal regulations. The EFPs would 

be effective no earlier than March 18, 

2015, and would expire no later than 

December 31, 2016, but could be 

terminated earlier under terms and 

conditions of the EFPs and other 

applicable laws. 

DATES: Comments must be received no 

later than 5 p.m., local time on March 

18, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by 0648–XD739, by any one 

of the following methods: 

• Email: EFPs.2015@noaa.gov. 

• Fax: 206–526–6736, Attn: Colby 

Brady. 

• Mail: William W. Stelle, Regional 

Administrator, West Coast Region, 

NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way NE., 

Seattle, WA 98115–0070, Attn: Colby 

Brady. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Colby Brady (West Coast Region, 

NMFS), phone: 206–526–6117, fax: 206– 

526–6736. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

action is authorized by the Pacific Coast 

Groundfish Fishery Management Plan 

(FMP) and the Magnuson-Stevens 

Fishery Conservation and Management 

Act provisions at 50 CFR 600.745, 

which states that EFPs may be used to 

authorize fishing activities that would 

otherwise be prohibited. At the June 

2014 Pacific Fishery Management 

Council (Council) meeting in Garden 

Grove, CA, the Council considered an 

EFP application from the San Francisco 

Community Fishing Association and 

Dan Platt. An opportunity for public 

testimony was provided during the 

Council meeting. For more details on 

this EFP application and to view a copy 

of the application, see the Council’s 

Web site at www.pcouncil.org and 

browse the June 2014 Briefing Book. 

The Council recommended that NMFS 

consider issuing the following EFP, and 

that this EFP be issued for 2 years. The 

2-year duration is intended to coincide 

with the 2015–2016 biennial harvest 

specifications and management 

measures process. Therefore, to reduce 

the administrative burden of issuing 

annual EFPs during the 2-year 

management cycle, NMFS is 

considering issuing the EFP described 

below for a 2-year period. The EFP 

issued for this 2-year period would 

expire no later than December 31, 2016, 

but could be terminated earlier under 

terms and conditions of the EFP and 

other applicable laws. 

Commercial Yellowtail EFP 

The San Francisco Community 

Fishing Association and Dan Platt 

submitted an application to continue 

their 2013–2014 EFP work for two more 

years. The primary purpose of the EFP 

is to test a commercial hook and line 

gear to target underutilized yellowtail 

rockfish, while keeping bycatch of 

overfished species low. During their 

work in 2013 and 2014, a total of 

approximately 3.6 mt (3,600 kg) of 

yellowtail rockfish was harvested with 

very little bycatch of co-occurring 

overfished species. 

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16 

U.S.C. 773 et seq., and 16 U.S.C. 7001 et seq. 

Dated: February 25, 2015. 

Emily H. Menashes, 

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable 

Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. 

[FR Doc. 2015–04355 Filed 3–2–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–22–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

RIN 0648–XD732 

Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to 

Specified Activities; Taking Marine 

Mammals Incidental to Shell Ice 

Overflight Surveys in the Beaufort and 

Chukchi Seas, Alaska 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice; proposed incidental 

harassment authorization; request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: NMFS received an 

application from Shell Gulf of Mexico 

Inc. (Shell) for an Incidental Harassment 

Authorization (IHA) to take marine 

mammals, by harassment, incidental to 

ice overflight surveys in the Chukchi 

and Beaufort Seas, Alaska. Pursuant to 

the Marine Mammal Protection Act 

(MMPA), NMFS is requesting comments 

on its proposal to issue an IHA to Shell 

to take, by Level B harassment only, 

seven species of marine mammals 

during the specified activity. 

DATES: Comments and information must 

be received no later than April 2, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Comments on the 

application should be addressed to Jolie 

Harrison, Chief, Permits and 

Conservation Division, Office of 

Protected Resources, National Marine 

Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West 

Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910. The 

mailbox address for providing email 

comments is ITP.Guan@noaa.gov. 

NMFS is not responsible for email 

comments sent to addresses other than 

the one provided here. Comments sent 

via email, including all attachments, 

must not exceed a 10-megabyte file size. 

Instructions: All comments received 

are a part of the public record and will 

generally be posted to http://

www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/

incidental.htm without change. All 

Personal Identifying Information (for 

example, name, address, etc.) 

voluntarily submitted by the commenter 

may be publicly accessible. Do not 

submit Confidential Business 

Information or otherwise sensitive or 

protected information. 

A copy of the application, which 

contains several attachments used in 

this document, including Shell’s marine 

mammal mitigation and monitoring 

plan (4MP) and Plan of Cooperation, 

may be obtained by writing to the 

address specified above, telephoning the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES