alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------



            BRADLEY REAL ESTATE ANNOUNCES SHARE REPURCHASE PLAN AND
                    2.7% INCREASE ON COMMON STOCK DIVIDEND

NORTHBROOK, ILL., Nov. 23/PRNewswire/ -- The Board of Directors of Bradley Real
Estate, Inc. (NYSE: BTR - news) today voted to authorize the Company to
repurchase up to 2 million shares of its outstanding common shares from time to
time through periodic open market transactions or through privately negotiated
transactions.  On November 22, 1999, Bradley Real Estate had 24,060,057 shares
outstanding.  The share repurchase program will be in effect until December 31,
2000, or until the authorized limit has been reached.  The Company expects that
the purchases will be funded primarily through asset sales.

Commenting on the program, Thomas P. D'Arcy, chairman and chief executive
officer, stated, "We seek to capitalize on current market conditions in which
the value of our underlying real estate is more highly valued in the private
property markets than in the public equity markets.  Therefore, we plan to
strategically dispose of certain assets and utilize the proceeds from such sales
to repurchase our stock while also paying down our debt.  This will allow us to
maintain the financial strength and flexibility our Company has long enjoyed
while adding value for our share owners through the reduction in our total
shares outstanding."

Also today, the Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend on
its common stock of $0.38 per share, an increase of 2.7 percent over its
previous quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share.  The Board also declared a
regular quarterly cash dividend on its Series A Preferred Stock of $0.525 per
share.  Both classes of dividends are payable on December 31, 1999, to share
owners of record on December 13, 1999. The common stock dividend payment
represents the Company's 154th consecutive quarterly dividend payment to its
common share owners.

The preceding information contains forward-looking statements of the company's
plans, objectives and expectations, which are dependent upon a number of factors
including a stable retailing climate in the Midwestern United States, the
financial viability of the company's tenants and the continuing availability of
retail center acquisitions and development opportunities in the Midwest on
favorable terms.  Reference is made to the discussions under the captions "Risk
Factors" in the company's 1998 Form 10-K report, which includes a discussion of
certain other factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from
those in forward-looking statements.

Bradley Real Estate is the nation's oldest real estate investment trust and a
leading owner and operator of neighborhood and community shopping centers
located in the Midwest region of the United States.  The Company owns 98
shopping centers located in 15 states aggregating 15.5 million square feet of
rentable space.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7420
ERIC SMITH, Petitioner - Appellant, versus EUGENE NUTH, Warden; ATTORNEY GE NERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-1885-JFM) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 24, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eric Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Nuth , No. CA-95-1885-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 3, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
Doc ID: 3982730
99-936.

#### State ex rel. Jackson v. McManamon.

In Mandamus. On motion for appointment of counsel, motion for evidentiary hearing on writ of habeas corpus, motion for leave to seek- discovery evidence to support mandamus and habeas corpus, motion for leave to hold evidentiary hearing in habeas corpus proceeding, motion to dismiss by Judge McManamon, answer of respondent Warden Christine Money, and motion for an order finding respondents in contempt.

*Sua sponte*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
~ 

'.• !6:P BE6ItET . U, A a· @RM 6HI•Nf 

· 18 Septemb.er 1950 

:MEMORANDUM FOR U o So REPRESEHTATIVES 

SUBJECT: 

Enclosure: 

BRUSA COMSEC Conference 

(A) Schedule ot equipments ! . 

lo Enclosure (A) is submitted for your information and guidanceo 

2o Members of Subcommittees or ot Working GrQups· are not authorized to disclose and/or discuss 

any equipments listed under Paragraphs I and II of 

Enclosure (A) until the Uo Bo Chairman ot the 

appropriate. subcommittee has indicated that the time 

has arrived tor such action in each caseo 

)o It is .obvious that "U. S~ EYES ONLY" papers should be given special handling to prevent inadvertent sighting by British representatives. For this 

reason, such papers will not be brought to.Combined 

Meetings under any ciroumstanoeso 

. 4o The Uo Bo Chairman of each Subcommittee and 

Working Group will be the principal spokesman tor 

the Uo So Groupo Uo So Members ot subcommittees and 

Working Groups will confine themsel~es in Comb~ned 

Meetings to matters which have been presented to the 

Combined.Meeting by the Uo So chairman of the group involve do 

TOP StiOUm'i' 

ill a Sa ~l};g QHlaY 

EARL E. ·STONE 

Rear Admiral, Uo s. Navy 

Direc·tor 11 Armed Forces Security Agency 

TOP SECRET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-30-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
., 

·ireP SESR'S'P 

tt. s. tns e!H.Y 

Io Equipments which have been authorized tor 

disclosure and for di~oussion with the Britisb: 

Ao Literal equiRments: 

1 o AFSAM 2-1 · EO 3.3(h)(2) 

2 o A!'SAM 7 ° PL 86-36/60 USC 3605 

3 o 7-rotor BOU 

4o ?-rotor PCM 

s D :UCM. . 

60 CSP )800-A . 7o . t A$E\ D- 1. )_-~-pr_o_p_o_s_e...,,.4_m_o_d"'""'1,....,t,...,,,1-c-a-t1,,....o-n-_ -----

q, ~f~\.... S-\ot·~)-B o C~phony equipments: .. 

0 

lo ASAY 4· 

2o ASAY 8 

3o ASAY 9 (See Note 1) 4o BuAer o1phon7 equipment (TSS) 

Rote 1: Although authority to disclose 

this item was granted,-1t will be withheld until disclosure has been authorized 

b7 D IR.AJ'SA D 

c~tax·egu1pments: 

. lo ASAX 2· 

2o NRL citax 

IIo Authorit7 has been requested from AFSAO for . disclosure, at the discretion of DIRAFSA, ·of· the 

following atfdltlonal items: & · · 

Ao Literal equipments: 

lo AFSAM 9 

2o One-time tape scramblers (CSP 4400 

and OBP 4500) 

Bo 01phon1. equipments: 

lo -ASAY 6 

!OP SEC:RE'I' 1 

TOP SECRET 

ENCLOSURE (A). 
• 

REF ID:A6728~ 

p TOP SECRET ~ '19P 8 EGR'Si' 

U. 8 a iiBS. 0H:&Y 

IIIo The following equipments have not been 

authorized for disclosure and/or discussion with the 

British: 

Ao Literal a·auipments: 

lo ECM (SIGABA) 

2o CSP 2900 . )o CSP 2300 

4o. AS.AM lS . 5o AFSAM )) (CSP ))00) 60 CSP 2)08 

?o SIGNIN 

So ASAD 2 

·Bo C1phony egui.pments: 

lo None 

Co Oitax equipments: 

lo ASAX 3 

!OP SE6RET 

U. S. Ikfi"'S'· ONLY . 2 

TOP SECRET 

j.:NOLOSUR.E (A)
• 

c 

REF ID :A522572. 

;.-...._ 

f()P SECRET 

APPENDED DOC 

USCIB: l4/1Jl9 CODE ATERIAL 

14 January 1952 24 

'l'OP SBeRB! TMtTRI'l'I Ba~Oltlt/lt'ISPI 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

.. Subject: 

Iief erences: 

French Communication Secu"i';ity • 

(a) USCIB lA/132 dated 15 May 1951. 

(b) USCIB ll,,/137 dated 11 June 1951. 

1. The 9'll.closure ~tlth reference {m) was forwarded to tha 

. National Security Council 1~ursuent to USCIB decision at the Sixtytourth Meeting, 24 Mey 1951. Reference (b) contains the forwarding memoranduw. from tba Chtlri:!!Bn, USCIB. 

2. Notiticat1on ot National Security Cooncil action in this 

matter is contained in tha inclosure hereto. 

1A.V~ 

~~JOOES J. .W. PEARSOO 

S@cretariat, USCIB 

Inclo&ure - 1 . Exec"Sec'7,._ NSC, Memo for USCIB dated ll January 1952,, 

subject as ._bove. . 

l USCIB: U./JJ39 

APPENDED DOCU 

CODE ERIAL ,. 

SECRET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-28-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352\3 
• • • 

This document io '" be read only by those personnel officially indoctrinated in ace~,, 411ce with com- munication intelligence security regulations and authorized to rooeive the information .-eported herein. 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRF.sIDENT 

NATIOOAL SECURITY COUNCIL 

WASHINGTON 

J~uar.t ll, 19S2 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE UNITED STATF,5 COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE BOARD 

St1BJEC'l': French Camnmication Security 

REFERENCE: Memo tor Executive SeCHt.&1"7, NSC, .f'rcm Chairman, 

USCIB, Bute subject, dated June 7, 1951 

The President~ ~ the recommendatim of the Secretaries ot State and Defense acting as a Special Camnittse or 

the Naticnal Securi.t7 Council en this subject, has this date 

appl'OVed the concluaims and recammendation$ cantained in th• 

report ot the USCIB-LSIB representatives, attached to the relerence memorandum. 

cc: The Secret&17 ot State 

The SecJ"9t,ary ot Detenae 

/8/ James s. Lay, Jr. · JAMES s. LAt, JR. 

Executive Secretary 

ARMED FORCES SECURITY AGENCY Fo~~ ~~t-gosc TOP SECRET SUEDE
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D23-1820

LT Case No. 2002-CF-1507

_____________________________ 

ERICE GREEN, 

Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

3.850 appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County. 

R. Lee Smith, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Darnelle Paige Lawshe, 

Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. 

No Appearance for Appellee.

October 10, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

JAY, EISNAUGLE, and PRATT, JJ., concur. 
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549








Form 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934


Date of Report (date of earliest event reported): February 1, 2018








DAVITA INC.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)











Delaware1-14106No. 51-0354549(State or otherjurisdiction of incorporation)(Commission File Number)(IRS EmployerIdentification No.)


2000 16 th Street


Denver, CO 80202


(Address of principal executive offices including Zip Code)


(303) 405-2100


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)


Not applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)











Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





❑Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





❑Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





❑Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





❑Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))







---



























Item 5.02. Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers





(b) On February 1, 2018, Carol Anthony (John) Davidson, a member of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of DaVita Inc. (the “Company”) since 2010, notified the Company that he plans to retire from the Board on March 1, 2018.  Mr. Davidson’s decision to retire was not due to any disagreement with the Company.





Also on February 1, 2018, the Board adopted resolutions that provide that the size of the Board will be reduced from eleven to ten members, effective upon Mr. Davidson’s retirement.







---
























SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





DAVITA INC.Date: February 7, 2018/s/ Kathleen WatersKathleen WatersChief Legal Officer
..... .......... 

!!!E...-

8'!'--

~ ... ::::;;- -

a-.· . 

.. 

. 

;--

- ·-

.. ;:;-. 

~-

!!!"=--- --

m;::=_ 

~ ii.to--

----

---

- -

...... 

~ 

... ~·­

---:· .... .:. - ( "k:-~ 

---........... -~ ......... ,. 

- ... ""-""-==-=-·~-;;,.-·._,..._ ----

SECRET 

JGIJIORAHDUM VOll ifnlGADlER. JQ.HN !It'l'Md 

SUBJECT 1 GCRQ Rist.Gries 

-,.r-- • ..-,::::r..- . ..,_ 

9 May 1952 

l.. '1;he wiclosUN la a copy at t.b.e oovering' ~\Ill which 

act:o1111"8.J11ed the clratt doeulllent. referred to 1n the Mmormlwn. 

2. I wuld be gratetul it you would quer;y OCl1Q to ucortain 

vhan 1Nt 'fiil7 expect. copies of the fil!al version of t.hi• h1ghl.J' 

interesting vo1\a ot the OCHQ biawriA1111. 

. 

:-9,. • 

\~ 'l~ .\:;_. ~~.~ .. "-~.; ... c:i(_'"')-."!.).IC\~~' .. 

~~~-~~~. 

\ ~~ S\- ~\. ~~:~·~ .. ~~" ~~. 

i 

I
4.-.~ '· ~.,·, 

r-

~ 

E· 

f.;:_ 

~ 

~-

Ill'"" 

?· 

... 

-

!F=--

IE;:__ 

r!f· ..... 1911.='• -

1..~ 

CJ 

If 

_ ........... __ ~-

~­.-

UL.Till J • CJNIJIR 

Ha.jor Oeneral, u~ Arii:q 

• Arzr.od 1orclas t.Teeari t,y AiCllC,1 

v.P.Friedman/eby/13 Oct S2 

Consul tant/6049.3 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 06-12-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

- ' • .
KINDER MORGAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 32.1 – CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. (the “Company”) for the yearly period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| Dated:  February 23, 2009 | /s/ Richard D. Kinder                                      |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | Richard D. Kinder,                                         |
|                      | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Kinder Morgan      |
|                      | Management, LLC, the delegate of Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc., |
|                      | the General Partner of Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. |
|                      |                                                       |
• 

Dr. \ialter 1' G. ~ 

REF ID:A415B7i&i .... 

8el'ial: 715 

11. p .,,,/,-5/+-

vice Presiclent am a......i 1faDl&er 

Zlectroniea Db1a1on 

Oeneral·siects-ic CarpaQy 

Syraeuae, Jfev l'ork. 

/.£t~r <!4.tlf'errl~ vit4 rir. Calrll8, Cl'lalr:iiw or "!.be 

Hat:..ona.l. Securit;y ~'\i•n~.Y Sclenttttc .t.dvi.sory :Jolt.rd (NSASflB), 

~. Rober'tlaOD, an4 t>r ~ Wilka, 1t vouJ.4 ~ U.t the ..t 

auitable a.tea -ror the next ~ nietttl~ W\tlll lle 'l'ullSday 

and Wedllcl4ay; 20-21 .Apr11 l].571, 

bag.-,. tar the .. ting Will J)roOaDly be 18At to 

)'CN at.ft. At t.hia t1-1 baW:YW, l WOUld epprec18ta your 

avlstna .- o.! a.rq ·iteld you voul4 lik$ plac:e4 on the agerda. 

l hope yew vlll fi»d ~Mlr in po•1tion to at\ebd tbe 

IQud aMt.1rc ua4 Pl'Ollltl.J U»Oa l'9ftipt ot .tr1r-.t1'" 111torat1on, I will be aJ*1 to •Dll 10\.1: travel orditn, 1.t requiretl. 

Copy furnished: 

Dr. s. s. Cairns 

cc: AG 

c/s 

s/ Pi3ST (Mr. Friedmlm) 

Sinceiwl,y, 

'-~lU!AM r. l'ftDDIAJ( 

Exitcmo1ve Sec::rotcr.q 

1131. 3aient1t1c ~Jieary Board 

M/R: Invitation to·20-21 April HSASAB Meeting. 

M.M.Felert1ki/S/~T/&J493/10 Feb 51-': 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 12-01-2014 pursuan~ to E .0. 1352a
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HEI, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended November 29, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas J. Nesbit,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                             /s/ Douglas J. Nesbit
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Douglas J. Nesbit
                                             Chief Financial Officer

Date: January 13, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to HEI, Inc. and will be retained by HEI, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
REF ID:A63806 

--

IO DISIJ,'RIBUTIOlf 

DJlUlSA 

I 

\ 

SUSLO-'I 

x 

x 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

'WL PD 

PERSOlfAL l'OR PULLIIG FROM 1RIEI1Wf 

PI&ASE coRVn FOLLOWING ml I QUO'l'E 'rBAIK You FOR ncs wrJD m AM Ar.SO 

LOOKING FORWARD TO SEEING YOU SOOI 'ff> Mt VISIT TO FRIEND IN I I POSTPONED 

A.'J! MY REQUEST UftIL A'F'l'ER FIRST 'WEEK lH J'E.BRUARY PD IK MIWf.rIMB Bi .ASSURES Mil: 

THAT wrm REGARD TO 'WSAT WB CALL OUR I ..... ------------'~ SIS WILL 

STAM> tJl'rIL WZ MEE'r PD AlJ!ll WRIED FROM UIM THAT PROSPECTIVE Jl\OCBURE Olf 'PROPER 

USAGE STILL D P.REP.ARA!ORY STAGES PD HENCE WE CAI :RBS1.r EASY rem A WHIU: LONGER PD 

UIQUOTB rRIEIIWf 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

l. l 

' I 

WlLtIAM 1. ralltlO.N 

SPECIAL ASSIS!I'Alfl '10 DIRISA 

eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-19-2014 pursuant to E.O. 

3526
#### Tilley, Respondent, vs. Washburn, Appellant.

*September 26*

*October 1, 1895.*

*Appeal: Stay of proceedings: Recall of execution: Release of levy.*

1. The perfecting of an appeal from a judgment and giving of the undertakings prescribed in secs. 3049, 3053, R. S., after levy of execution on personal property, operate to stay all further proceedings on the judgment, but .do not *ipso facto*recall the execution or release the levy.

2. The supreme court has inherent power in such case to recall the execution and release the levy, upon terms.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Eich-land county: Geo. Clementsoh, Circuit Judge. The appellant moved in this court for. an order staying proceedings *106on execution pending the appeal, and for recall of the execution and release of the levy thereon.

*Motion granted.*

*John I). Wilson,*for the motion.

*F. W. Burnham, contra.*

Cassoday, O. J.

It appears from the record that April 18, 1895, a money judgment was entered in this action in the circuit court, in favor of the plaintiff, for $1,029.04; that the defendant thereupon obtained a stay of execution for ninety days, in order to make a bill of exceptions and take .an appeal; that the ninety days expired on or about July 18, 1895; that on or about August 22, 1895, the plaintiff issued execution upon said judgment, and on the following dajr levied upon a large amount of personal property; that August 21, 1895, the defendant duly appealed from such judgment, and perfected the same by giving the undertakings prescribed in secs. 3049, *3053,*E. S.; that August 29, 1895, all papers in the case were filed in this court; that September 10, 1895, the defendant demanded from the sheriff the property so levied upon, but he refused to surrender the same.

Upon the facts stated, we must hold that the perfecting of the appeal and giving the undertakings mentioned operated to stay all further proceedings on said judgment (sec. 3066, E. S.), but did not, *if so facto,*recall the execution or release the levy. *First Nat. Bank v. Rogers,*13 Minn. 407; *S. C.*15 Minn. 381; *Robertson v. Davidson,*14 Minn. 554; *Stricker v. Wakeman,*13 Abb. Pr. 85. These decisions are under statutes similar to our own. This court, however, has inherent power to recall the execution and release the levy upon terms that are just and equitable. *Levy v. Goldberg,*40 Wis. 308; *Janesville v. Janesville W. Co.*89 Wis. 159, and cases there cited.

*By the*Gowrt.— Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the ■appellant’s motion be, and the same is hereby, granted on *107■condition that he first pay to the sheriff his fees in full on said execution, and $10 costs to the attorney of the respondent, and the fees of the clerk of this court on this motion.