alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### PREMIER CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant Cross Appellee, v. Julio R. SERRANO et al., Defendants-Appellees Cross Appellants.

No. 76-2049.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 17, 1978.

Bruce T. Wallace, Ann Arbor, Mich., Geoffrey H. Longenecker, New Orleans, La., James R. Beuche, Ann Arbor, Mich., for plaintiff-appellant cross appellee.

Shevin, Shapo & Shevin, Ronald A. Sha-po, David A. Freedman, Paul A. Louis, Miami, Fla., for defendants-appellees cross appellants.

Before COLEMAN, HILL, and RUBIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In this case, the District Court fixed the amount of attorneys fees to be awarded the attorneys for class action plaintiffs after a settlement had been approved. As a part of the settlement, the defendant agreed to pay a reasonable fee but it was dissatisfied with the amount assessed. It appealed. After oral argument, we directed a limited remand to the District Court, *Premier Corp. v. Serrano,*5 Cir. 1977, 565 F.2d 1353. The District Court promptly complied with the remand. After various preliminaries, which need not be detailed here, the Court entered an order, again fixing the attorneys fees at the amount originally specified.

Premier Corporation vigorously claims, not altogether without justification from an argumentative standpoint, that the amount of the award was excessive, a position disputed with equal vigor by the beneficiaries of the award. The dispute has been pursued on both sides with what amounts almost to unprecedented acrimony. Aspersions have been showered upon opposing counsel in a fashion not customarily seen in, or tolerated by, a court of appeals — or, for that matter, by any other court. In the bloated condition of the case load in this Circuit, however, and in view of the fact that we do have a complete record before us, we have decided that the interests of justice would be better served if we ascribe these activities of counsel to excessive zeal, however overdone, and proceed to decide the appeal.

We have carefully weighed the merits of the situation. We find that the District Judge did consider the guidelines prescribed in *Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.,*5 Cir., 1974, 488 F.2d 714. Whatever our individual views might have *567been had we been sitting on the case in the first instance, from an over-all evaluation of the record we are persuaded that the award was not an abuse of judicial discretion. Consequently, we cannot disturb it on appeal.

All pending post-appeal motions and counter-motions are denied. The appeal involves nothing more than a dispute over the amount of an attorneys’ fee award. Before we could confidently dispose of the case, the appellant prevailed to the extent of obtaining a remand. Accordingly, we have further concluded that no attorneys’ fees are due the class action attorneys in connection with this appeal and the parties will bear their own costs.

AFFIRMED.
SI 0-100316-00: 

W ^ w 

City of 

Corpus 

Christi 

AVIATION 

DEPARTMENT 

1000 International Dr. 

Corpus Christi 

Texas 78406 

Phone 361-289-0171 

Fax 361-289-0251 

www.cclexas.com 

March 10,2010 

CORPUSCHRISTl 

INTERNATIONAL 

AIRPORT 

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Docket DOT-OST-2010-WW 

Dear Mr. Secretary; 

On behalf of the Corpus Christi international Airport Board, I would like to thank 

you for the opportunity to express our support for the application for antitrust 

immunity and proposed joint business agreement filed by American Airlines and 

Japan Airlines. The proposed alliance between these two airlines is vital for the 

oneworld alliance to compete effectively with the Star and Sky Team Alliances. 

This increased alliance competition will in turn enhance the benefits of the 

Department's Open Skies policy, then by serving as a foundation for further 

liberalization across Asia. 

After a thorough review, we encourage the Department of Transportation to 

approve this application as it would enable these oneworld alliance airlines to 

work closely together to deliver highly competitive air transportation services. 

Approval for AA/JAL alliance will have a positive impact on air travel by offering 

customers more service, scheduling and pricing options and will help to ensure 

that customers continue to benefit from the competition afforded by three 

competitive air alliances. 

We urge you to quickly approve this application. 

Sincerely, 

Ed Hicks, Chairman 

Corpus Christi International Airport Board
exv10w26






10.26 Corn Kernels Purchase Agreement, dated May 11, 2011, between Shandong

Xiangrui and Shanghai Yihai Commerce & Trade Co., Ltd.




Execution Date: May 11, 2011




Party A: Shanghai Yihai Commerce & Trade Co., Ltd.




Party
B: Shandong Xiangrui Pharmacy Co., Ltd.




1. the type, class, weight, price and delivery of the grain




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Weight	 	 	Price for	 	 	 	 
	Type	 	(ton)	 	 	each ton	 	 	Total Price
	Corn
	 	 	20077	 	 	 	2200	 	 	RMB 44,169,400






2. Standard of quality



The content of water shall be less than 16%, and impurities shall be less than 1%.



3. Delivery



The deliver date shall be May 11, 2011 to May 12, 2011; the site shall be Hezhe, Shandong.



4. Packing and transportation



The purchaser shall deliver the corn by itself.



5. Payment



The purchaser shall make the payment at the date of execution of the Agreement.



6. Breach of contract



If the purchaser breaches the Agreement, the purchaser shall pay 20% of the value as damages.



7. Miscellaneous



The Agreement shall take effect since both parties execute this Agreement.



8. Dispute resolution



Both parties shall resolve the dispute friendly, or the court of the execution of the execution of
the Agreement shall have jurisdiction over the dispute.



Execution:


Supplier: Tai’an Branch of China Grain Reserves Corporation.



Purchaser:
Shandong Xiangrui Pharmacy Co., Ltd.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

February 3, 2023

No. 04

- 22

- 00310

- CR

Julio C. RIVERON

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CR2932 Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell , Judge P residing



### O R D E R

On December 5, 2022, we abated this appeal to the trial court to hold a hearing to determine whether appellant’s court

- appointed counsel had abandoned the appeal

. We received a supplemental clerk’s record and supplemental reporter’s record on February 3, 2023. The supplemental clerk’s record contains findings of fact and conclusions of law, stating that appellant desires to prosecute his appeal

, that appellant’s counsel has not abandoned the appeal, and t hat there was good cause for the delay in filing appellant’s brief. Appellant’s counsel stated to the trial court

, at the hearing

, that he would be able to file appellant’s brief by February 7, 2023.

I t is therefore ORDERED that this appeal is REINSTATED on the docket of this cou rt. It is further ORDERED that appellant’s brief is due on February 7, 2023 . No further requests for extension of time will be allowed.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affix ed the seal of the said court on this 3rd day of February, 2023

.___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Name                              State of Organization or Incorporation
----                              --------------------------------------

Bronner Slosberg Humphrey Co.      Massachusetts business trust

BSH Holding LLC                    Delaware limited liability company

Bronnercom, LLC                    Delaware limited liability company

Sansome, Inc.                      Massachusetts corporation

Bronnercom (UK), Inc.              Massachusetts corporation
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 21.01

                                 SUBSIDIARIES OF
                    OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH + REHABILITATION INC

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CM Occupational Health, Limited Liability Company,
A Maine limited liability company
(also doing business as The Health Center)

OHR/MMC, Limited Liability Company,
A Maine limited liability company
(also doing business as Occupational Health + Rehabilitation,
An affiliate of Maine Health)

Kent/OH+R, LLC,
A Rhode Island limited liability company

OHR/Baystate, LLC,
A Massachusetts limited liability company
(also doing business as Occupational Health + Rehabilitation)

OHR/SSM, LLC,
A Missouri limited liability company
(also doing business as SSM Corporate Health Services)

Occupational Health Connection LLC,
A New York limited liability company
(dormant)

OH+R/Boston, LLC,
A Massachusetts limited liability company
(dormant)
-i 

• 

I 

' l 

l 

l 

i 

.··. ,. _, ' . - -- - =---- - - -..;.__ --·--·:_ .• _ .. ..'.. _'! . - . ..;....J-•• 

REF ID:A63209 

...,.IYJQJ' Jq v. ~1" 

U»oolll Wxmltor;f 

M11tacll\.1Mtta X..t.ltut. ot ~locr 

•• 

~ 

o. lkw TS 7,, JllH-.Chwieit. 

IMar' flrot•MOr ~I 

-

lbl• i. to ~ nce1pt. cia 17 r.~ flt JOUl' ~ d&'Md lT ~ lPSS. Md w thMk r«a tor c:alll1.1& 

'Ill a\tent.1oa to ~ a1.tor. 

fiMt ro.i T1t1te4 tbe lifll/lttl:1 lM\ J11¥, a lllai.t.i7 tw 

Clluuitut• .. )lion ~llbt4 "° .... u. all tbl- •tJd .. ..,.,t:iw tatte:f{ .ueh_ .. tnTel Ordars tD1 n~uw, 

:it!oi.~ ~ -.:: ~ .. "::,; :*,O: :!:et!~ Ntt., *A ~ tor Coluultclt.11 u4 lie w1U ldfeUil&W 

tbl •tter ~. tcRi _,, epeet to ,._.. ,,,_ at. llOO!l· 

.... t~ 1:1&\ it .. Dlce•-.r:r for 101 to au thi9 - rq ~\1osa1 '.I-, 

ear NJ 

C/s ..,. •,.,,//ff,r._ I I 44 , l ~w;_"-;._:.· ........ .£..-.• ~ -

C (Mr. Wiltdom, PERS) 

M/Rs Sel:t explamtory .. 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 06-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Luke E. Fichthorn III, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, certify that this quarterly report of Bairnco Corporation on form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this quarterly report of Bairnco Corporation on form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bairnco Corporation for the period ended July 5, 2003.





Luke E. Fichthorn, III



Luke E. Fichthorn, III

Chairman &

Chief Executive Officer











#







EXHIBIT 32.2







CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Lawrence C. Maingot, Controller & Chief Accounting Officer, certify that this quarterly report of Bairnco Corporation on form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this quarterly report of Bairnco Corporation on form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bairnco Corporation for the period ended July 5, 2003.





Lawrence C. Maingot



Lawrence C. Maingot Controller &

Chief Accounting Officer



#
, 

-~ Art!l\IP L. ~-l Zl~f!~~ 

REF ID:A41583jaf 

., 

Vlw.lt #'I! ~18UIS..~--~-

~··· 1w Yodl . 

~l)r.~.~ 

Gsial: ;> J.. I 0 

1 3 f1J>~ i9s.11, 

. X1t o preJ.O\W 1e\tct tb ~' it vaa •W thft1 ~ to 

ti. ~41 Al't'U· mMUl11 ot -.. lattoJn1 ~tr~ scs.ntUl~ 

MYi~ao.4• - ?l"IMl ~-a ue .itO a11t,... ot * . laud, will '* t!l>l.4 to e__. 'ldt.h ,ca co ~ ot ~ w811'1-

tatS.e .na ~ •dintw, . . 

we_.., ~as a~~ ot au three~- w ~ ~cm to..ai Jfl\Y 195'~ ~ tbe ~- ot OD ftnt · <Slit~ aU U......., ~ift ~ vt.U 'M a~Ulbt4 •. 

tbs.~~oa11'•~-~-. tint .., "1U be laWte4 to ~Sua '°'1 ¥1th -~-­ - ., .... 18't• 

ot ::o:r-'••= a11 tw attCt. ~ ·••-4 •· a.,, vu.1 

,,. . w. ~ ----1oa.--~- Of ..... our ..,_Gal~~~ p1&lm tw ~ ;pM1el Mtl'ft• t~. . ·. 

x~ sa ~ ~ t11at .,_. v1:u 'be abl4 to attend. tlW ~U. c 1'0tb ._ _., . . 

. u ,_ viU let: m lmOV ~- ·'°" plea to at'*4 d tbt ml8 

ot w-. trav9l "'"1 prctV. :t Tirlll 1-Vt ..... ....,,, tnvoJ. ~ . .-t . . 

.. 

M/lf ~ .1tint w.wtg ot ~ ot llWSAI,, d SSJVtte• . &~ot ..... , 

eo: AO . . C/8 · . .· ..... , wazC pproved for Release by NSA on 12-01-2014 

D/Uft (Mt. r)<-.... . . . . _.u ..... rs ..... u ..... an ..... t ...,.to __ E __ . 0 ............. 1 ..... 35 ...... 2 ....... 6 ______ _.
CONTRACTORS APPROVAL FORM

FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF CLASSIFIED MATERIEL

AT NSA/CMC FACILITY

New Account (fax completed and signed form to 301-688-5468)

Update for Existing Account (fax to 301-688-5468) Customer ID Number

Shipment or Delivery Customer ID Number (this form must be attached to the CMC receipt)

To All Contractors:

In order for your facility to be considered for an account, you must be the Prime contractor and holder of an 

existing NSA or Government contract and have possession of COMSEC or NON COMSEC material that was acquired 

under this contract as either direct transmittal or allocated funds specifically defined on the contract DD254, 

qualifying this materiel as GFE.

Complete the following information: (*Note – This information will be entered into our database as your 

information of record. The “Name of Point of Contact” is responsible for keeping this account current and 

compliant with our procedures). Please be aware that falsifying US Government documents will lead to suspension 

of services and other applicable actions. 

Date CIN

Name of Company Fax

Name of Point of Contact Phone

Company Address Email

Government Contracting Officer Representative (COR)

Government Facility/Agency Contract Number

COR Name Phone

Email Address Contract Date

Under the above referenced contract number, I am the COR for 

 Company Name 

that has acquired materiel under this contract by the following, qualifying this materiel as GFE: 

Direct documented transmittal from the COR

Specified funds allocated to the contract specifically defined on the contract DD254

COR’s Signature Date Signed
MR. PAULL. GRETCH 

Director 

Office of International Aviation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

SECRETARi A DE 

COMU NICAClONES 

Y TI'.;.\ NSPO RTES 

. . ·· ., 

Mexico, D.F., a 14 de junio de 2012. 

DeCJ r Mr. Gretch: 

. This letter is to confirm that the Mexican Civil Aviation Authority, on the basis of 

reciprocity, will approve requests from US - designated airlines to perforrn seventh freedom 

charter operations from third countries to Mexico on the understanding that US Government 

wilf approve requests from Mexican- designated airlines to perform seventh freedom charter 

operations frorn the United States of America io third countries. 

\, 

Sincerely you rs~'., 

\ "'-... 

\' 

\ T E'~ T A M E N T E .. 

EL DIRB(~TR . ENERAL ADJUNTO c (': . " . O'E. 

oe rRANsPoR..r_e_ Y NTJAeRo_N ___ A_·urlc_ f)_. N~ ~_~'- . \ / 1.>'".:\,!'::.e .",lR'E.CC~s r"'', .l>' <\ \ · 

. '\C~ C~ · w,;.'l:"·"- · -{:r . ' '!j'f'\ 1\J\'l 

SALVADO TAN.t} ROZANO {! 'i ~ .;' e!'te 

( cofd~r:i~~~$,f4 ciOl'~~ro 

~w-·· --, 3 ~"-' \- ··±'"~ / ' 

( ' . / -::._ . ·- - -· . .. . . . . -· .. - ·· c .GJ?,..,...t:Jt .Jerg1o 1·wmero urozco.- urrector General de·Aeronauflc;a C IVIL- f-'te . 

c.c.p.- Direcci6n General Adjunta de Transporte y Control Aeronautico.- Oficinas.- Pte. 

' 

\ 

'i· 

I' 

l: 

I! 

I,' , 

f; 

.I\
APPA PRINCIPLES ON

EPA RULEMAKINGS TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE

FOR EXISTING ELECTRIC GENERATING UNITS

UNDER SECTION 111(d) OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT

December 2013

The issue of global climate change needs to be addressed. Since the Clean Air Act (CAA) was not 

designed for regulation of carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases (GHGs), APPA believes Congress 

should take the lead in addressing the issue. However, it is very unlikely Congress will enact broad 

climate change legislation in the near future due to a lack of consensus about whether and how to address 

the issue. Partly due to this stalemate in Congress, the President has instructed the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) to exercise the discretion given to it by the U.S. Supreme Court to regulate 

GHGs.

Thus, APPA will work with EPA and the states to develop a regulatory regime that is consistent with 

Section 111(d) of the CAA, is workable for public power utilities and their customers, and adheres to the 

following principles:

 Is based on commercially demonstrated, cost-effective, and available technology;

 Recognizes the substantial emission reductions from the power sector that have already occurred 

and will continue to occur as a result of unit retirements, fuel switching, energy efficiency 

programs, and increasing use of renewable and other non-emitting or lower emitting energy 

sources, both voluntarily and pursuant to state mandates, among other factors;

 Recognizes the key role states have in developing and implementing Section 111(d) with 

maximum flexibility and discretion;

 Provides credit for early action;

 Minimizes costs to all consumers to keep electricity affordable;

 Protects the ability of U.S. industries to compete in world markets;

 Does not jeopardize reliability or create any reliability gaps;

 Recognizes regional and state diversity;

 Recognizes that generation resources can serve load in multiple states;

 Recognizes key characteristics of public power utilities, such as consumer ownership, not-forprofit operation, relatively small size, limited or joint generation ownership, and other factors;

 Prevents consumers of load-serving entities from paying stranded costs for existing fossil-fired 

generation units, allows existing fossil-fired units to operate for their remaining useful life, and 

ensures utilities can manage risks on investments, including regulatory risks, they make to 

comply with the state programs implemented under Section 111(d);

 Provides sufficient time for compliance, including incremental approaches; and

 Considers the impacts on different wholesale electricity market designs and operations.
. > 

- - --·-·---------------------- - - . - - .. - - . - - -------- REF ID:A335545 . • • 

Dlar *'· JTiecSmn: 

XD reQCmee to JOU1" rape.ti 1 mft 1DCl.oeed --

.......... :tor tbe :eeeor« ot our 41ecus1ou vttll the 

C1T11 Ben1.ce CCmiaton relJ!l,Z'4!Dg JOur recent ,,..tiou 

• re~. 

n .. do not 11n1tate to call• tt •mm be at aq 

:tuZ'tber au1stanee. 

])¥:1: 

•I• 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 05-16-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
- . .,a ·.) REF ID: A335545. 

K. I,. 'lflq'lal/l July 1957 

..WJectz ReelWl.O,..nt ot a Jlltind Amu:l:taa.t - *"• Will iNll P. ~ 

~ queatlcaa wre ra~d wit.b ftPl"d. to tbe ne111Plo)'mut ot ·*'. 1'£-iedmn. i'b.e•e are u tollowa 

lf!P.!• Om Mr· l'riedman 1• zwtirwn'S be W1TM by the Civil lel"lice 

•• cm t. tbe kye be 1• eawpl0l'W4 u a Ccmaultant (WAS) ~ IBA.t 

AEWER: :so. Vl:ib. repnt to this q~eat.:t.aa .. ~. oOldbfll'I oi tbe Civil 

ma• .. t1remtnt DS.v:l.lll.OD adYiaed that Yb:lle at.t amiui tiant eoul4 waive 

uy- or au et b.1• ·~t amwlty, it was not poa•1ble to vaift it 

on 8IJii" pven 4a'M• (1.e., day& on Wblcb be 1• e11>l.O.Yd by mA). Where 

an UID\litant, 6o J'9U'tl ct age ar oldar, 1a :reemployed. 1A 'the l'edaa1 

Hniae, tl1e b.trSDa Apney •ball Geduo-5 tl"Cll tbe mployee'• •l.ar,y a 

wa equal to the ~t. 

~ 

!!fl! ODu14 Mr. rriedau. re:l:tlburH '\be '.f.reuury on a IJ&y to ~ 

b18 retiNment an4 accept tuU caqpeneat1on. tar bi• ccmaultant 

1141ft':t.ceet 

AISWll: lo. Di.IC\l.8•ed with Mia• DUll\ta1 CSC, ~t Dl.viaJ.on, who 

re&iTed to the tollev1Dg ••twnt ill Public law a,a., 81ttb. Coagres•J 

(70 lt&t74J)i . 

"It - armuitant Wider thi• A4t beft&tter beclan9• em.pl.~e4 .. 

or on the date ot enactment. ot the CS.dl Service :a.ttreent. Act 

.wamerits ot 1956 la Mrdng, in a appo:lDtive or el.ecUve 

poa1t:loA, h1a ••nice Oil aP4 &1'ter the date be va. _,l.Ofe4 

abaU 'be ccrvered by tb1s Act. Ito deduet.1cm• tta 'the fund abaU 

be v1thtutl4 tl'Qill b1a a&J.ary, but tben a1'all be aducted traa 

Ide MlN'y a .. equal to tu mrRy anocam w s Peiod. 

ot aotual mplo)rllemt. • 

(Ucdllr•cor1Dg auppl1ed)
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1918 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to extend the import- and 

export-related provision of that Act to species proposed for listing as 

threatened or endangered under that Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 3, 2015 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. CARDIN, 

Ms. MIKULSKI, and Mr. MARKEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to extend 

the import- and export-related provision of that Act to 

species proposed for listing as threatened or endangered 

under that Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Conserving Ecosystems 

5 by Ceasing the Importation of Large (CECIL) Animal 

6 Trophies Act’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1918 IS

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF 

2 1973. 

3 Section 9(a)(1) of the Endangered Species Act of 

4 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1538(a)(1)) is amended by striking sub5 paragraph (A) and inserting the following: 

6 ‘‘(A) for any such species listed, or proposed to 

7 be listed, under section 4, import the species into, or 

8 export the species from, the United States;’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
- ---~ .. -~~ --~~--~·~-

REF ID:A64631 

.. l"1alt 

hllr Admiral s~e. ~p:r, USN (R.t.) 

4495 a..rti•l4 ~ .. 1.v. 

'VMh.:1.agton J & • c. 

DM.r Mlnl"'8.1 lloo;iar i 

Capte.tn llleDon<i bu tol~ • ot ,-e.ir tele~ ~11 

t.e Jt11 otti~ ~ l8 October 1S54. I tailed. to t61l b~ 

~t you xw:n":'lally MY• • Wuhington ad.d!'ffil ~ W Uk 

h1D to t..laphon" )ICU. Al .. mwe~u"x;.ee ., l.aat i.tt.r ._.. Mnt to fl.or1da. In accordance Y1th )'tNl" ~st, l 

.. "~M'M.t~ '1lfJ letwr ar ll OctQoor to ;you ~r •~po.-­

ratt.i ~-

..,_ ct our p&'Qple are .,... lltut\yU>.g 'tho ~t1orus 

nt1-t1T• \() ~ «MP9tUMtiCJ*l, iA ~t'!tion V1\h tbe 

"mnt ~ a. ~•uJ:te.n't'• ho to a J'M1:rtd .lavti.1 1'N'1c-ar4 

W. y1ll -.Av19e ~ ut tho pert1nlnrt i.ilplic&t1QtlA relative 

w 'T(fl.'tr enices u woon as t.be 1t~ tl&IJ ~ cccple'ted. 

llQMver, IGM .r tho }01nt1 ~ MY1J -to~ o.lArllW dur!tia ~ rlait Yii.b m. 

t • a,l.a!.1 to kD:N thet 1'0tl are ~ bl.ek in Vuh1ngton 

-.11 p looking tor«\~ to tM1ng )"0\1 "ttey' ~. 

~l;r, 

Wn.u.AM r ~ fftim:W!I 

._eutive Senrlrt.l1.r/ 

IDaA k 1fi\t1 tic >A:vltm'Y Jk)ard 

cc! N.1 

c/a 

s/ ABST (Mr. :rrie'1imn) · 

Mr. Wh~om (NSARC) 'f£R3 

M/R i Adnt. Hooper re~uested in telephone call 

on 18 Oct. that ltr ~rial 56o3, dtd. 12 

Oct 54 be resent to local e.M.rese. Ltr. 

lie 1t' --explAna. tory . 

@'pproved for Release bv NSA on 07-16-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352\3 

~ ....... _____________ ~_