alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1825 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1825

 To require the Secretary of Energy to obtain the consent of affected 
   State and local governments before making an expenditure from the 
           Nuclear Waste Fund for a nuclear waste repository.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 22, 2015

 Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. Heller) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of Energy to obtain the consent of affected 
   State and local governments before making an expenditure from the 
           Nuclear Waste Fund for a nuclear waste repository.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nuclear Waste Informed Consent 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act, the terms ``affected Indian tribe'', ``affected unit 
of local government'', ``Commission'', ``high-level radioactive 
waste'', ``repository'', ``spent nuclear fuel'', and ``unit of general 
local government'' have the meanings given the terms in section 2 of 
the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10101).

SEC. 3. CONSENT BASED APPROVAL.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may not make an expenditure from the 
Nuclear Waste Fund for the costs of the activities described in 
paragraphs (4) and (5) of section 302(d) of the Nuclear Waste Policy 
Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10222(d)) unless the Secretary has entered into 
an agreement to host a repository with--
            (1) the Governor of the State in which the repository is 
        proposed to be located;
            (2) each affected unit of local government;
            (3) any unit of general local government contiguous to the 
        affected unit of local government if spent nuclear fuel or 
        high-level radioactive waste will be transported through that 
        unit of general local government for disposal at the 
        repository; and
            (4) each affected Indian tribe.
    (b) Conditions on Agreement.--Any agreement to host a repository 
under this Act--
            (1) shall be in writing and signed by all parties;
            (2) shall be binding on the parties; and
            (3) shall not be amended or revoked except by mutual 
        agreement of the parties.
                                 <all>
```
REF ID:A275534 

NATIONAL. SECURITY AGENCY 

FORT GEORGE G MEADE, MARYLAND 

Serials 

Mr. William G. Bryan 

292 Davis Street 

Greenf'ield, Maes. 

Dear Mr. Bryana 

.. ' 

Reference 111 tni!.d.e to your letter of l~ May 1958 requesting 

Vbether information contained in the technical. publication, 

"German Mil:!. taey Cipher11 f'rom Februaey to November 1918" 1 ot'f'ice ot 

the Chief Signal Officer, W:ir Department, m&y be made public to the 

membereh1p ot The American Crytogr&m Association. 

Department ~ Def'enee Directive 5200.1, 4ated a July 1957, 

•tatea1 

"Al.1 material directly related to Cryptographic Systems which 

vae previou.sly claHified RESTRICTED Security Information ie 

upgraded to CONP'IDENrIAL-.. •" 

In viev ot the above it 'Will not be -possible to grant 

author:lcat1on ~or ~ubltcation or the material, in whole or in part. 

Copy furniehed: 

Ch1 USASA 

Sincere~, 

GARRISON B. COV'ERDAl:B 

lla3or General, US A'1!tfl1 

Ohie:t ot Statt 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 05-16-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

               Subsidiaries of Workgroup Technology Corporation


Workgroup Technology GmbH, organized in Germany
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-54042, 333-45732, 333-39860, 333-36640,
333-36618, 33-50860, 33-50862, 33-50864, 33-57734, 33-78804, 33-92312, 33-95288,
333-22631, 333-26857, 333-28745, 333-28675, 333-40671, 333-46259, 333-78553,
333-78551, 333-60764, 333-53705 and 333-53707) of ePresence, Inc. of our report
dated February 1, 2001 relating to the financial statements, which appears in
the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report
dated February 1, 2001 relating to the financial statement schedule, which
appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 28, 2002
POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints each of Robert K. Kretzman and Michael T. Sheehan or any of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the REVLON, INC. (the ‘‘Corporation’’) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the ‘‘Form 10-K’’) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any applicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents this 13th day of March,  2007.

|        |  |  |                  |
|--------|--|--|------------------|
| /S/    |  |  | EDWARD J. LANDAU |
|   |  |  | EDWARD J. LANDAU |
|        |

----
# CE2004084EN.01015901.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/159 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/159

---

(2004/C 84 E/0197)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0082/04

by Proinsias De Rossa (PSE) to the Commission

(20 January 2004)

Subject:   Clinical Trials Directive

Subject:

Further to the Commission's response to E-3209/03 and E-3215/03 (1) on implementation of Directive 2001/20/EC (2), what views were presented by the Irish Government representatives at the 15 May 2003 pharmaceutical committee meeting? What progress has been made in the preparation of the implementation guidelines for this Directive in the Member States?

1

2

Answer given by Mr Liikanen on behalf of the Commission

(23 February 2004)

(23 February 2004)

The Commission is currently working together with the Member States in the preparation of the implementing guidelines of this Directive. In this context, the Irish competent authority informed the Commission that specific guidance for the application of clinical trials will be developed and published soon.

The Commission discussed a first draft of the implementing guidelines with the Member States during the Standing Committee meeting held on 23 July 2003. No agreement could be reached during that meeting. The new draft for the implementing guidelines is still under discussion within the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 70 E, 20.3.2004.

1

(2)  OJ L 121, 1.5.2001, p. 34.

2

---
~­

~--

--

---

• 

~-=­

~: _,,,,,, 

~:-

~ r;---

~ -

~ 

..... 

F-

--

i-

~-= 

J -

-----::-

- - . 

-

- ~ • _ _, I .,.. ~- -

REF ID:A68210 

____ ( ·~-..... [ """'--W_.-..__~ 

....... _ ... --~-::: - , .. ""'- -' -

Dr~ H. ?. Robertson 

J)is-eoto:t or Rese~~h, '.-.'f.aJ 

ot!!ce o.t tho se~"~ ot Detenee 

The P«tta;on Vashlngt.o~n 2s, n. c. 

lJear "Bo"- - - '¥1 

~ 

J 

J 

!hank ~u tor ti.tu.ming t..'le tour report.3 wa checked out 

tQ ,ou 1ast. tail.. I atil raturninJ henr.11t.h -,our receipt far 

'\he doc~~, 

I aa var, :torq you a.ru leaving ~~:s art~ and ahall misa 

fOU• But. 1 have re3l h~es th.at we will get toiather ~nin 

in the not, too diet.ant ru.t!Jre .. when Uie new SCAG is est.3bUshed. 

Yit.h coNial ree;aros Ui all the Robert.:;on1~ I a, 

Copilts tor: 

AO ()) 

001' 

tiILLI.AM F • FRI~A.'f 

Consult.ant 

W.F.Friedman/eoy/23 Jwic 52 

Consultant 

MEMO FOR RECCRDi This letter is in reply to Mr. Robert:ron• s ltr of 

l 7 June 52 with 4 incls OOT requested be returned 

in our ltr Ser. 60221 dtd 4 Apr S2. .. ~. - Y• 

~- -. ----· -

____ @'pp roved for Release by NSA on 06-13-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a __ _ 

-_J 

f 

. 

I
i;---

....... 

=---=-

"""'"" 

~-

= -

~--

- .. .4. 

lttl-1.i ~~3"3 . . :-\\-'=)~ 'S1-

- ... --- - . 

. _ VO a1"Q ~~ \q 70 .. for~ the t.b:ie1 durln.:! the dU'tift'J.t.it:J Qt c4:o•!n~ .mr..,, Iii wasli!ngf.on .. to :o owr t!D DJ&•t.rca ,._ T ~t JDa ~~·tlo_ lill-:;ou of' om" ~uon. 

J)UIJ note !a \Je1al t.akail of 'l'JW: cwant.s Aid ~f.ions an 

.. ~~. -~ . --

~ 

la'- U\tle ifhU~ I_ 'flA3' ~ j'tiU a clftlt. ot a riatemV:mt ~ a ~ ~at0p ~ ~ ~ ~!G aod ask tor 'TCur ccremto. ~ r I ,,. -~ - _., ~ I. "' o • 

~is ~~~~edged ol 70ur le\W- o? 2l Jvna 19$2 to 

•• -~ ~·t7. bad~e n~er 1~ ~1.ch you. ret.urnod 

-W 114• I ~ ~ U.e-~~.!D !tin ~ repos1toey, am tba 

fOfi ftttt 1.·~r!ne Ids ele'IOail. 

JW01~:Ltin3 10l11" penonal ~:s _...d otleri..ng .,- best. lfishoo 

ta JOU in tak!~ T.lp-arJ.Ce lllOl".:J 70ur ~essor181 dut.iu, I a, 

Copies turnished1 

AO (3) 

OOT 

n..,.q. 

wJF.Friad.rran/eb:f/9 July 52 · 

Consultant 

--- .HERO _FOR R!CORD1 S~~lanatory. Dr. Robertson was Research Director, 

W::(tfl, or?., ortlie sec. ot Defense, This letter is in repl:t' to Dr, R' 1 

1'

6

tJter ot,j() J~e ~~to~' _M~'- ~~~ ~rtal Q04J8, dtd 

t ®e ;.J~t. ·~:t.- ' 

.. -- ............. -.-· - ... ~- _ ..

@'ppro;ed for5Relea~ by NSA on 06-13-2014 pursuant to E .0. 1352a 

l 

• 

1 

I
REF ID : A66-9B1--

CONFta!NTb\t 

PlmiltAHmt ron n Ci«BF or sWP 

SUBJ'ro? I Oate;:or1.eo of NSA SpOC'ia.1. tie~ nnd Ptl"fJOi1nal Sldl1ett '.l'hendn 

1. We bavo NCdttly ca.iplete.1 a rather al..ab:>mte '!SA 'Alllerp::cy 

liar Pl.AA. we al.so have a detailed N5A D.18aoter Plan, In CO"l1'10Cti'l1\ 

tlllnr.d.th I rccon: JO:Kl tor C'>'1sidesration the utility ot ~ne ard 

'Plll"iodicraU:r l'6'0'1tnd.n-3 a dor.r.mnt. 1.-rt which vou1d bo l.'lrted (a) tho 

'tal'iO'lUI tecLlmic11l am attdn.1.strative spacial.ties or inteltcat to t:",A 

And (b) the JISA ~~om'!1 (above t..bo 18Tl'el or NY~-?) aldUed in 

"1cef\ IJPQC1al tiee, 

~ 

2. ?nclosure 1 1a a ·~ llet of epecd.nlties, It cguld 

bG ~ to coYW ~ts ..,r ~ field vbiah ?sve been 

cweJ.oo't.:cd_. ID u to -.kG tcta llsttng fairly~. 

3. '.l'tl9 tJUG&tion o.t uaigrmnt. ot porsonnol. 1.nt.o t.heua CAte:nriec 

ot llp901.&l.tiea1 O...Y!ti ~ally' the question at listing tho apecd.al:lats 

1r1 each ca~r, in mne Z'Ol.at1vo ra."lk bnaed upon a.a eva.luatior.. af 

t.bair' ii'ldivirhial 8kUl. am oxper.lenco ~ant n.thor dell.eat.ft proble!'VJ but I .a:ppoao tho Uftis o r.uld. bo dra;.;n up i..., v. eatiatac~on or t.he 

MjontJ" •.}f the ldgh-QC1-.io11 !iJSA gt.W:ling authorl.t1eo1 

4. It. ia ~~d.ed that t.h:!a p&per ba ~l'dcd to tile Chiota 

at ~fices and Start Din.tons tor oar.irmt. lf 1ha pro3eot wts 

.S.t.n ~ nppro1al.1 thon a SW!ll grou.p eoa.14 be &'?pointed t"> 

reo:r"M0'\111 a projeot and a pl.en ot proaedure t.:> ~t it. 

WILL!AMF,. P'RlEDHA.M 

8peeial A-Utant 

CONFIBENTIAL 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-20-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a -- - - -- • - - -=a !L_ .. 
· .,., REF ID: A66981 

-eaf\'FIBCNJIALl. Pm:rin plall.1'11.ng (large proble:is mquir.1ng l.c:n1'."P..r:inge1 loni;- ~ OPQl'lltJ.ona) 

2. Salut.ton or cOl!lpl.ex "'tBau.al lVUte:lB 

3. Solution ot ~-..ac'-iine 9311tens (lit~al and t.eleprJ.ntor) 

h. er,pt;a.~c B11Chixwr:f' (daait:n and utilisation) 

S. C17i.lto-n:r"J.tetmt.1aim• 

6. S:aluU.IXl ol oi~-cil'ax ayeWJG 

7., 017Pto-l.:!J\..~• 

Uc • .flDENTIAL 

--------------------------------------
#### Follansbee and others, Respondents, vs. Kellner, imp., Appellant.

*April 8*

*April 30, 1897.*

*Levy v. Wilcox, ante,*p. 127, followed.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: D. H. Johnson, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Hoyt, Ogden da Olwell,*attorneys, and *George Lines,*of counsel; a brief in reply by *Hoyt, Ogden da Olwell;*and the cause was argued orally by *F. M. Hoyt.*

*150For the' respondents there was a brief by *Howard & Mal*lory, and oral argument by *Samuel Howard*and *Ii. B. Mallory.*

MaRshall, J.

This action is ruled by *Levy v. Wilcox, ante,*p. 127.

*By the*Gourt.— The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint and enter judgment barring the action to void the tax-sale certificate and the proceedings on which it was based, under sec. 1210h, S. & B. Ann. Stats., and for costs in favor of defendant Kellner, to be taxed according to law.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 19

- 60674 Summary Calendar

**Maria Mercedes Gomez**

**- De Saravia,** 

Petitioner **,**

versus

**Merrick Garland ,**  U.S. Attorney General **,** Respondent

**.**

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A208 538 949

Before **Davis, Stewart,** and **Dennis,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

Maria Mercedes Gomez

- De Saravia petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision denying her motion to reopen. She argues that a recent Supreme Court case, Pereira v. Sessions , 138 S. Ct. 2105 (2018), necessitates reopening and termin ation of her removal proceedings

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 20, 202 1 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-60674 Document: 00515828675 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2021No. 19

- 60674

2 and, alternatively, that Pereira renders her eligible for post

- conclusion voluntary departure and thus the time and number limitations associated with motions to reopen should be equitably tolled. Here, the BIA denied the motion to reopen as time and number barred. Alternatively, the BIA held that on the merits Pereira did not apply to Gomez

- De Saravia’s case. We do not address Gomez

- De Saravia’s argument that the 90

- day period for filing a motion to reopen should have been equitably tolled. This court reviews an immigration court’s denial of a motion to reopen removal proceedings “under a highly deferential abuse

- of

- discretion standard.” Garcia

- Nu ñ ez v. Sessions, 882 F.3d 499, 5 0 5 (5th Cir. 20 18 ). We find that Gom ez

- De Saravia ’s arguments regarding Pereira are precluded by our precedent. Pierre

- Paul v. Barr , 930 F.3d 684, 689

- 90 (5th Cir. 2019) , cert. denied , 140 S. Ct. 2718 (2020) ; see also Mauricio

- Ben i t e

z, v. Sessions , 908 F.3d 144, 148 n.1 (5th Cir. 2018). He r arguments do not concern the stop time rule and so her case was not changed by the decision in Pereira

. Id. We lack jurisdiction to consider Gomez

- De Saravia’s argument concerning the BIA’s sua sponte authority. See Mendias

- Mendoza v. Sessions , 877 F .3d 223, 227 (5th Cir. 2017).

**AFFIRMED** in part; **DISMISSED** in part. Case: 19-60674 Document: 00515828675 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2021
USCIB: 5.2/97 

REF ID:A67780 

IOr 31!;CKl:rl' 

3 June 1955 

TOP SEC!tZT - U.S. !!'f!'.S OiftiY 

UNITED STATES COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE BOARD 

AGENDA FOR 

One Hmdred Sixteenth Meeting at 1030, on Friday, 

10 June 1955, in the Director's Conference Roan, 

Administration Building, CIA, Washington, D.C. 

Mr. Allen W. Dulles, Chairman 

PART I - AGENDA ITEMS 

·nate ot Initial Subject 

Consideration Number Sub.lect Subnitted St 

10 June 1955 12./ l. Cryptographic Assistance Exec. Secy. 

·to Thailand 

(USCIB 12./10; 12./15; 12./16) 

10 June 1955 13.l/ 2. Personnel Security Standards 

{USCIB 13.1/7) 

Exec. Secy. 

USCIB: 5.2/97 

TOP SECRET 

eclassified and a ro d for relea e b SA on 09-04-2014 ursuantto E.O. 13 2 
. --~~ ~[ JP,.;.l\.fi.11B0 - 1 or ;:n:""""'i:.. 1. w 

USCIB: 5.2/97 

'f0P SEeftET - tJ. S. EY~ OlftY 

Item No. 

1. 

2. 

PARr II - Background Information on Agenda Items 

Subject and Summary 

Cmto,raphic Assistance to Thailand. USCIB 12./10 (COMSEC 

2-lS/i forwarded to USCIB (and USCSB) the basic request 

received by the Army member from JUSMAG, Thailand for cryptographic assistance for the Thai Army. The broad nature ot 

this request necessitated action to obtain further information. This information is reported in the enclof!'ure wi1;.h 

USCIB 12./15, which also contains the views of the Director, 

NSA on the problem, as subnitted to USCSB for vote sheet 

action. All USCSB members approved the NSA views except the 

ArI1J3' representative, who submitted comments with a request 

that USCIB views be sought. The Army views are quoted in 

USCIB 12./15, in which the Executive Secretary scheduled the 

problan for consideration by USCIB at this meeting. The 

Executive Secretary requested that comments by the Director, 

NSA and the Department of State member be made available for 

circulation prior to the meeting. The comments of the 

Directqr, NSA are contained in USCIB 12./16. Department or 

State comments will be forwarded at an early date. · 

Personnel Security Standards. On 5 May 1955, the Executive 

Secretary prepared a res'\llll~ of lessons to be learned from the 

Petersen ·case ( CIB # 000ll9), in which he recommended consideration of certain actions as a step toward improvement in 

the overall security program. Vote sheet replies were 

requested and, when received, were surmnarized in USCIB'l3.l/7. 

In view of the replies received fran the Defense member and 

the Director, NSA and after consultation with their representatives the Executive Secretary scheduled the problem for 

consideration at this meeting. 

USCIB 

USCIB: 5.2/97 - 2 -

TOP SECRET
#### In re Harrington.

*January 30*

February *23, 1906.*

Habeas corpus: *Constitutional law: Sentence to state reformatory: Transfer to state prison by board of control: Judicial powers.*

Sec. 4944c, Stats. 1898, as amended by eh. 28, Laws of 1899, authorizing the board of control, under certain circumstances, to transfer convicts from the state reformatory to the state prison, is not a conferring of judicial power on the board of control, which, by the constitution, is confined to courts.

Application for a writ of *habeas corpus.*

*Denied.*

Original writ of *habeas corpus*sued out to discharge petitioner from custody by tbe warden of tbe state’s prison. On May 8, 1903, be was convicted of crime and sentenced to an indeterminate term of one to seven years at tbe reformatory at Green Bay. About November 23,1905, be was transferred' to tbe Wisconsin state prison at Waupun by an order of tb& state board of control, on tbe ground that it appeared to said board that said *Harrington*belonged to class 1, as defined by sec. 4944c, Stats. 1898, as amended by cb. 28, Laws of 1899,. and that bis continued presence in tbe reformatory was detrimental to tbe other inmates thereof, under which order be is now held. A return being made disclosing these facts, tbe case was beard thereon.

Eor tbe petitioner there was a brief by *Morse <& Johnson,*and oral argument by *B. L. Morse.*

Eor tbe respondent there was a brief by tbe *Attorney General,*and oral argument by *A. C. Titus,*assistant attorney general.

Dodge, J.

Tbe petitioner seeks to assail tbe constitutionality of our recent statutes authorizing tbe indeterminate sentence and tbe transfer of prisoners upon tbe order of the board of control. He waives discussion of tbe constitutionality of the portion of those statutes authorizing an indeterminate *242sentence, in deference to *In re Schuster,*82 Wis. 610, 52 N. W. 757, bolding that snob question would be reviewable upon writ of error to tbe conviction and sentence and, therefore, is not upon writ of *habeas corpus.*He, however, seeks consideration of tbe question whether tbe authority given to the board of control is a conferring of judicial power, which, by the constitution, is confined to courts. This subject is fully considered and decided in *In re Linden,*112 Wis. 523, 88 N. W. 645, which is decisive against the contention of the petitioner.

*By the Court.*— The petitioner is remanded to the custody of the warden of the state prison, to be held as before the writ issued.
COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS

Benigno R. Fitial

Governor

Eloy S. Inos

Lt. Governor

June 1,2011

Ms. Deborah Jordan

Air Division Director

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Region IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94195-3901

Re: Designating Areas within the CNMI under the Clean Air Act

Dear Ms. Jordon:

Thank you for the opportunity to recommend the designation of areas within the Commonwealth

ofthe Northern Mariana Islands ("CNMI") for classification under the revised S02 National

Ambient Air Quality Standard ("NAAQS"). We understand that designations must be made on

the basis of air quality monitoring or air quality modeling regarding attaining the new NAAQS

for S02, which is confirmed when the 3-year average of the 99th percentile of l-hour maximum

concentrations does not exceed 75 ppb.

The CNMI has neither the monitoring data nor modeling data to allow it to make a

recommendation regarding attainment at this time. Accordingly, we recommend the entire

CNMI be desirated as unclassifiable.

Sincerely,

~

ELOY S. INOS

Acting Governor

Caller Box 10007 Saipan, MP 96950 Telephone: (670) 664-2200/2201 Facsimile: (670) 664-2211
Exhibit 23.8  Consent of F.H. Brown  I consent to the inclusion in this annual
report on Form 40-F of North American Palladium Ltd., which is being filed
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of references to my
name and to references to my involvement in the preparation of technical
information relating to the Shebandowan West Property, Ontario, included in the
2008 Annual Information Form of North American Palladium Ltd., dated March 16,
2009 (the AIF).  I also consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-10 and amendments
thereto (No. 333-147126) of the references to my name and the
above-mentioned information in the AIF.   Dated this 16thday of March, 2009.(signed) F.H. BrownName:
  
  F.H. Brown, CPG, Pr. Sci. Nat.Title:
  
  Consulting Geologist