alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 38 (Thursday, February 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10486-10487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03984]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than March 13, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Yvonne Sparks, Community 
Development Officer) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:

[[Page 10487]]

    1. HopFed Bancorp 2015 Employee Stock Ownership Plan, with John E. 
Peck and Billy C. Duvall, all of Hopkinsville, Kentucky, and Thomas I. 
Miller, Murray, Kentucky, as trustees, to acquire voting shares of 
HopFed Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of 
Heritage Bank, USA, Inc., both in Hopkinsville, Kentucky.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 23, 
2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-03984 Filed 2-25-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
# CE2004088EN.01051701.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/517 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/517

---

(2004/C 88 E/0529)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0620/04

by Concepció Ferrer (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(1 March 2004)

Subject:   Export of military ammunition to African countries as hunting ammunition

Subject:

Various prestigious NGO's (Oxfam, Amnesty International, Greenpeace) and the Autonomous University of Barcelona's Peace Culture School have claimed that Spain has been exporting military ammunition, as if it were hunting ammunition, to the following African countries: Ghana, Guinea Conakry, Central African Republic, Mauritania, Cote d'Ivoire, Senegal, Guinea Bissau, Angola, Burkina Fasso and Cameroon.

Apparently the Customs Registers of the Spanish Tax Agency show that the cartridges exported weighed on average 40 kg, and cost an average of EUR 120 each.

Given that it is difficult to believe that hunting ammunition of such dimensions exists, and that these exports of munitions brought in over EUR 4 million in 2002, is the Commission aware of these Spanish exports?

If the Commission is aware of the claims, has it taken or does it intend to take any steps?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(15 April 2004)

(15 April 2004)

The Commission is not aware of the exports in question nor does it possess the authority or the means to confirm or deny any possible misrepresentation of the stated end use of such exports.

Full responsibility for the licensing of arms exports rests with national governments. Consequently, it is not for the Commission to comment on Member States' practices in this area.

---
-78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0

 38.5

 39.0

 39.5

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/16

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 16 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

★

■ ■ ■

■

★

●

●

●

★

● ● ●

●
EX-10(b)






EXHIBIT 10(b)




Schedule of Executive Officers who are Parties

to the Individual Grantor Trust Participation Agreements in the Form Filed

as Exhibit 10(a) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

For the Period Ended September 30, 2003




Christopher M. Connor

John L. Ault

George E. Heath

Sean P. Hennessy

Thomas E. Hopkins

Timothy A. Knight

John G. Morikis

Steven J. Oberfeld

Thomas W. Seitz

Louis E. Stellato

Robert J. Wells
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                           7,506
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,655
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,216
<INVENTORY>                                      3,456
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,111
<PP&E>                                          16,274
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,928
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,817
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,736
<BONDS>                                          1,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        58,019
<OTHER-SE>                                    (32,938)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,817
<SALES>                                          6,802
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,030
<CGS>                                            3,735
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,806
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (21)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,697)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (50)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,747)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,747)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)
        

</TABLE>
#### In re Goking’s Will.

*September 5*

*September 26, 1899.*

*Wills: Undue influence.*

A finding of the trial oourt that an alleged will was not procured by undue influence on the part of the testator’s widow is *held to*he sustained by the evidence.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Sheboy-gan county: N. S. Gilsom, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

This is a will contest. William Goking, the testator, was born in Germany in 1822, and was married to *Louisa Golc-vug,*his widow and the proponent of the will, in 1851. He came to this country in 1852, and lived until his death, March 12, 1897, most of the time in Sheboygan county, in this state. He had accumulated about $30,000 worth of prop*29erty, and left surviving hnn his widow, the proponent, and five adult children. He executed the will in question July 17, 1878, leaving everything to his widow. The will was differed for probate, and due execution thereof was proven; but four of the children contested the will on the ground of undue influence on the part of the widow. The will was admitted to probate in the county court of Sheboygan county, and upon appeal to the circuit court the same judgment was rendered, and from that judgment the contestants prosecute this appeal.

The cause was submitted for the appellants on the brief of *Martin Hughes*and *A. C.*Prescott, and for the respondent on that of *Francis Williams.*

Winslow, J.

The sole question in this case was one of fact, namely, as to whether the alleged will was procured by undue influence on the part of the testator’s widow. Upon this question there was testimony upon both sides. The circuit court found the issue in favor of the proponent of the will, and wTe cannot say that such finding is not justified by the evidence. A review of the evidence would be profitless.

*By the*Court.— Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit  32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350)

	I, Michael E. Kibler, as the President and Chief Executive
Officer of US 1 Industries, Inc., certify that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2010, which accompanies this certification
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in
the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of US 1 Industries,
Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The foregoing
certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and shall not be
relied upon for any other purpose.  The undersigned expressly
disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification
except as required by law.

				Dated this 7th day of May 2009.



				/s/ Michael E. Kibler
				_________________________
				Michael E. Kibler
				Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to US 1 Industries, Inc. and will be
retained by US 1 Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





















Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350)

	I, Harold E. Antonson, as the Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of US 1 Industries, Inc., certify that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 which accompanies this
certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained
in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of US 1
Industries, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The
foregoing certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and shall not
be relied upon for any other purpose.  The undersigned expressly
disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification
except as required by law.


				Dated this 7th day of May 2010.



				/s/ Harold E. Antonson
				__________________________
				Harold E. Antonson
				Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to US 1 Industries, Inc. and will be
retained by US 1 Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The State ex rel. Jefferson, Appellant, *v.*Ohio Adult Parole Authority, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Jefferson v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.*(1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 304.]

(No. 99-413

Submitted June 8, 1999

Decided September 1, 1999.)

*305
      *Sell Jefferson, pro se.*

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Allen P. Adler,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

*Per Curiam.*

Jefferson asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his complaint for a writ of prohibition. For the following reasons, Jefferson’s assertion is meritless.

Despite Jefferson’s claims to the contrary, the *in forma pauperis*requirements of Sub.H.B. No. 455, *i.e.,*R.C. 2969.21 *et seq.,*are constitutional. See *Rash v. Anderson*(1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 349, 351, 686 N.E.2d 505, 506-507 (Sub.H.B. No. 455 does not violate rights of access to courts, due process, and equal protection, and the right against double jeopardy). And Jefferson does not assert that R.C. 2969.25 is inapplicable to prohibition actions. See *State ex rel. Zanders v. Ohio Parole Bd.*(1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 421, 422, 696 N.E.2d 594, 595.

Moreover, the issue Jefferson raises here has been previously adjudicated in his court of appeals habeas corpus action, and consequently, the collateral estoppel aspect of *res judicata*bars Jefferson from relitigating the issue in this action. *State ex rel. Williams v. Brigano*(1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 413, 414, 678 N.E.2d 568, 569; *Fort Frye Teachers Assn., OEA/NEA v. State Emp. Relations Bd.*(1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 392, 395, 692 N.E.2d 140, 144.

Based on the foregoing, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Form of Waiver


 Exhibit 10.2 
 FORM OF WAIVER 
 In consideration for the benefits I will receive as a result of my employer’s participation in
the United States Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, I hereby voluntarily waive any claim against the United States or my employer for any changes to my compensation or benefits that are required to comply with the
regulation issued by the Department of the Treasury as published in the Federal Register on October 20, 2008. 
 I acknowledge that this regulation may
require modification of the compensation, bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements, policies and agreements (including so-called “golden parachute” agreements) that I have with my employer or in which I participate as they
relate to the period the United States holds any equity or debt securities of my employer acquired through the TARP Capital Purchase Program. 
 This waiver
includes all claims I may have under the laws of the United States or any state related to the requirements imposed by the aforementioned regulation, including without limitation a claim for any compensation or other payments I would otherwise
receive, any challenge to the process by which this regulation was adopted and any tort or constitutional claim about the effect of these regulations on my employment relationship. 
 A signature transmitted by facsimile will be deemed an original signature. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I, [Insert
Name], intending to be legally bound hereby, and for full consideration, have executed this Waiver this      day of
                    , 2008. 
  

	
	  

	 [Insert Name]
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


To Boron, LePore & Associates, Inc.

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this registration statement of our report dated February 10, 1998
included in Boron, LePore & Associates, Inc., financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 1997 and to all references to our Firm included in this
registration statement.

Roseland, New Jersey
November 20, 1998



                                    /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
                                    ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-14-00601- CV Estrella Montoya, Appellant

v. Charles R. Holly, Jr., Appellee F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F B ASTROP CO UNTY, 21ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 29- 072, H ONO RAB LE CARSON TALMADGE CAMP B ELL, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N The pa rties have filed a joint status repor t. They state that the par

ties have r eac hed a settlement which resolved all claims betwee n the parties. They also reque st dismiss al of this cause from this Court’s docket. Ac cording ly , we dismiss the appea l. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) .

__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Jus tice Be fore Chief J ustice Rose, Jus tices Goodwin a nd Field Dismissed on J oint Moti on Filed: F ebrua

ry 5, 2015
• 

(.,.. ---

USOIB: 14/r/8 APPElW1'.:D OOClll .Er. 'l'S COtiTAD~ CvD1WOPJJ :i J~ Th:r.lliL 

11 Peblul7 1953 

lo !he mclaaure has been piieparecl b8 t.he Uo8o Oonteenoe 

Planning Callaittee u a recomrended U.080 podt:t.on on the abcmt 

aub3eoto 

2o th1a Jl'OPOAl ia tONal'decl vi'tb a 'flw to coneid.-ian 

at. the~ USOIB meetingo 

USCilc 14/r/8 APPb.1~DED OOGUi·'.B?\:J.'::> COIJ= 

TAD-~ CODElriOP..D ,t.',A'fERIAL 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-04-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

TOP SECRET 
REF ID:A65043 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A65043 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A65043 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A65043 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A65043 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A65043 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A65043 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A65043 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A65043 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A65043 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A65043 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A65043 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A65043 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A65043 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A65043 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A65043 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A65043 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A65043 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A65043 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A65043 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A65043 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A65043 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A65043 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A65043 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A65043 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

VELOCITY SERVICES GROUP

LOUISIANA, LLC

VERSUS

TERREBONNE RECREATION

CENTERS, LLC

NO. 2023 CW 0857

NOVEMBER 6,2023

In Re: Independent Specialty Insurance Company, applying for

supervisory writs, 32nd Judicial District Court, 

Parish of Terrebonne, No. 195455. 

BEFORE: THERIOT, PENZATO, AND GREENE, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT

MRT

AHP

HG
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code
  (i)
    
    The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  May 15, 2006
    /s/   DANA M. KELLEYDana M. KelleyActing Chief Financial Officer
# CE2004084EN.01056301.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/563 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/563

---

(2004/C 84 E/0640)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0275/04

by Christopher Huhne (ELDR) to the Commission

(5 February 2004)

Subject:   EU Charter of Fundamental Rights

Subject:

Articles 10 and 11 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights stipulate that the freedom of religion and expression is a human right for all EU citizens.

The French Government recently proposed to enshrine in law a ban on the physical manifestation of religious beliefs by wearing religious symbols (such as the hijab or headscarf) in state schools.

Does the Commission consider the French Government's proposal acceptable? What action does the Commission intend to take if this proposal is adopted into French law? Is the Commission currently taking any action?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(31 March 2004)

(31 March 2004)

The Commission is aware of the draft legislation in France that would ban the wearing of all religious symbols in state secondary schools.

Whether or not measures to ban the wearing of religious symbols are deemed to constitute unlawful discrimination under the terms of Directive 2000/78/EC (1) will depend on the concrete terms of the relevant legislation and on what justification is put forward by the Member States in question under the terms of the Directive.

1

The Commission is closely following the developments to which the Honourable Member refers and will consider the need for action and the form this should take in the event of violations of fundamental rights under Community law.

---

(1)  Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation, OJ L 303, 2.12.2000.

1

---
Request additional information for F.S. Air Service request to amend Exemption 7779A 

From: Stephen Happenny 

ANM-112, Propulsion & Mechanical Systems 

To: LMason3661@aol.com 

Cc: Mark Forseth 

10/11/2011 02:56 PM 

Hello Mr. Mason, 

In reviewing your request to amend F.S. Air Service Inc Exemption 7779A, I am 

requesting the following information: 

(a) The environmental control system for the CASA 212 Aviocar Model C-212-CC & -

CD and the model C-212-DF. Are they the same (i.e., same bleed extraction, same 

ventilation airflow; same temperature and pressure schedule across the airplane operating 

envelope; same internal flow characteristics, etc.)? 

(b) The airplane performance for the CASA 212 Aviocar Model C-212-CC & -CD and 

the model C-212-DF. Are they the same (i.e., same maximum and minimum operating 

altitudes, airplane cruise speed, climb and descent performance, etc)? 

This information will enable me to complete the technical review of the airplanes and 

proceed with processing your request to amend Exemption 7779A. 

Regards, 

Steve Happenny 

Aerospace Engineer 

Environmental Control Systems & 

Fire Protection Systems 

ANM-112 Mechanical Systems 

FAA Transport Airplane Directorate 

Phone: 425-227-2147 

FAX: 425-227-1320 

e-mail: stephen.happenny@faa.gov
# RED

# 0 SPOT PAINT & 

## VARNISH CO., INC.

TelEPHONE (812) 428·9100

- FAX (812) 428-9167 1107 EAST LOUISIANA ST. -P.O. BOX 418 • EVANSVILLE, INDIANA 47703-041.6 The Honorable Ray LaHood United States Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590**~~~.r8~~!etary LaHo~d:**  On behalfofRed SpotPaint & Varnish Company, I am writing to express our strong support for the application ofDelta Air Lines for new nonstop service between Detroit and Baneda. Approval ofDelta's new service would be amajor benefit for ourregion, where many corporations have strong trade and 

### marketpresence wlth Japan. There are over 500 Japanese companies located in Michigan and hundreds more whose business models rely on access to Japan and it's market. The acquisition of Red Spot by a Tokyo based company, Fujikura Kasei, has created demand for increased capacity to Tokyo. Om' business travelers wouldbenefit from the convenience offlying into Tokyo's downtown Haneda airport.
Detroitis aproven and suceessful gateway to Asia, and as an airport that can support trans·pacific routes. 

### This summer Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the commitment Delta made to DTW to make it the airlines gateway to Asia. Thl;') addition ofHaneda as a destination is anatural fit that would clearly benefit ourbusiness travelers.
Thank you for consideration ofthis request. Respectfu

### fly, 

# JIJ4
Emilee HlUe Corporate Director ofHR & Integration Red Spot Paint & Varnish Company