alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Jay A. Herman, Acting Chief Financial Officer of Delphax Technologies Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Delphax Technologies Inc.2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.     Dated: February 10, 2006 By:            /s/ Jay A. Herman              Jay A. Herman              Acting Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 13.2 Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of SK Telecom Co., Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the
period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), Shin Bae Kim, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Sung Min Ha, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge: (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Shin Bae KimName:
    Shin Bae KimTitle:
    Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    May 31, 2005 /s/ Sung Min HaName:
    Sung Min HaTitle:
    Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    May 31, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**Exhibit 3.1****SECOND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION****ARTICLE ONE**     DAWSON GEOPHYSICAL COMPANY, pursuant to the provisions of Article 4.07 of the Texas BusinessCorporation Act, hereby adopts Second Restated Articles of Incorporation which accurately copy theRestated Articles of Incorporation and all amendments thereto that are in effect to date and asfurther amended by such Second Restated Articles of Incorporation as hereinafter set forth andwhich contain no other change in any provision thereof.**ARTICLE TWO**     The Restated Articles of Incorporation of the corporation are amended by the Second RestatedArticles of Incorporation as follows:     The Restated Articles of Incorporation are deleted in their entirety and the SecondRestated Articles of Incorporation set out in Exhibit I attached hereto are substitutedtherefor.**ARTICLE THREE**     Each such amendment made by these Restated Articles of Incorporation has been effected inconformity with the provisions of the Texas Business Corporation Act and such Second RestatedArticles of Incorporation and each such amendment made by the Second Restated Articles ofIncorporation were duly adopted by the shareholders of the corporation on the 24th dayof January, 2006.**ARTICLE FOUR**     The number of shares of the corporation issued and outstanding at the time of adoption of theforegoing amendment was 7,484,044; and the number of shares entitled to vote thereon was likewise7,484,044.**ARTICLE FIVE**     The holders of and 5,543,199 of the shares outstanding and entitled to vote on said amendmentvoted for and 1,321,950 voted against adopting said amendment, and 9,243 abstained from voting.This Amendment has been approved in the manner required by the Texas Business Corporation Act andthe constituent documents of Dawson Geophysical Company.**ARTICLE SIX**     The Articles of Incorporation as amended by the Restated Articles of Incorporation and allamendments and supplements thereto are hereby superseded by the following Second Restated Articlesof Incorporation which accurately copy the entire text thereof and as amended as above set forthare as set out in Exhibit I attached hereto.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the corporation has executed these Second Restated Articles ofIncorporation by the undersigned officers effective this 11th day of May, 2006.      DAWSON GEOPHYSICAL COMPANY
T~P SE~E°t~J{1~~0E SUBJECT NUMBER Thili docwnell~ iii to be read only by thoae peraonnel oftlcially indoctrinated in accordance with eom- ·-- w-- munieation intelligence aecurity regulations and authorized to receive the information reported herein. 

USClS: 23/41+ 

Sub,}ect: 

Item 8 of the Agenda for the Seventy-fifth 

Meeting of USCIB9 held on 24 March 1952. 

____ __.lcolllltll.iriicati~ u$~~~~ity o 

·1;0 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

The Acting CHAIR.."1i'U~ (Genet-al. Canine) noted tb.at Mro Arm!;it?'Ong was prepared to comment further on this subjectp 

MRo ARMSTRONG11 informing the members that addit.ional info~tion had been 

received from Ambassador MacVeagh soon after the la.st Board me.eti.ng 9 conunented 

as follows: 

On 20 Deaember 19519 Amb~ssador MacVeagh talked with l 

on the basis of information.given him by U.SCI.B through the._D ... e_p_a-·rt.ni,..._.-en ..... t.--o ... ? .......... 

3tateo On lJ February 19529 Ambassador MacVeagh informed the Department 

of State of the outcome of his talks., He said thatr lhad 

.recognized the violation by his govemment of COSMib Regulations and 

atated that he had.issued instructions/for strict and literal compliance 

vi.th NATO Regulations in this regard Ui the futureu He also stated that 

the r I considered the TYP&X system reliable!>' and understood \the 

rei\ilatians governing its usage - a/point wich had been of some concem 

to USCIB mambersa I thad politei,- refused tile offer of t~chnical assistance made by .Ambassador MacVeagho 

The Acting CHAIRMAN asked if there were &111' comments on the remarks made 

0, tb-o Armstrongo 

There were no commentsa 

DECI3ION: (24 March 1952) USCIB noted the information presented by the member 

representing the Department of State and agreed that the matter would be considered closedo It was agreed further that this item would be removed from 

the agendao 

This item to be removed from the agendao 

USCI3: 23/ 44 - 14 -

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY Form17J~1~0SC TOP SECRET CANOE 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-13-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Iteris, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Abbas Mohaddes, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1.     |   | The Report fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                 |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| 2.     |   | The information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 
|   | /s/  ABBAS MOHADDES      |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Abbas  Mohaddes          |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |                     |
|   | October 31,  2008   |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or anyother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
September 18, 2013 

CERTIFIED- RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Regional Counsel, AS0-7 

Southern Region 

P. 0. Box 20636 

Atlanta, Georgia 30320 

Attention: Christopher R. Stevenson 

Re: Tyler Pennywitt 

FAA Case No. 2012S0150128 

RECEIVED 

SEP 2 6 2013 

~.~ARtNG OOCKEt 

I cannot afford to hire counsel to represent me in this matter. I should not have a civil penalty imposed 

since I have already been convicted of a felony for this exact same action. 

Sincerely, 

Tyler J. Pennywitt 

cc: Hearing Docket Clerk
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

ROUGli. DRAFT 

SPECIAL HANDLING 

8 September 1967 

Basis for Confidence in lehieving the Objectives of MOL 

I. Wherever reasonable, we are building upon the experience from and 

the best features of G and G3. This includes: 

A. Experienced personnel, many from G and some from G3 are working 

on the MOL program. 

B. Materials 

C. Design (e.g.) 

1. Thermal Control 

2. Film Handling 

3. Focus sensing and control 

D. Manufacturing and testing techniques 

E. Reliability and Quality Control 

Where MOL is beyond G and G3, we are designing with as much conservatism as reasonable to assure achieving the objectives. 

A. Although optics are larger 

1. Circular mirrors 

2. No hole in flat mirror 

3. Milder aspheric mirror than G3 

B. Optical alignment in orbit 

C. Strain-free mirror mounts 

D. Redundant camera 

E. 'Exposure bracketing 

III. Since the achievement of the objectives necessitates precise measurements and adjustments, we are building the very best of tools for test 

and manufacture. 

There has been an early recognition of the need for extending 

previous test procedures and'for building extremely good test 

facilities. 

B. However, the techniques will be based upon and extrapolated from 

ose now evolving and being proved on G3. 

itoUCAR D 

44- 061, / F,udJu .A1367-67 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

ROUGH DRAFT SPECIAL HANDLING 

CECRET 8 September 1967 

C. At this time, early results indicate that our test facilities 

should satisfy the needs of the program. 

IV. We now have, and will continue to argue for, an adequate and orderly 

program schedule. 

A. There is enough time scheduled to carry out the program. For 

example, there is a much longer period between the receipt of 

glass and the requirement for finished mirrors than in W. 

B. The schedule is orderly, providing for sequential validation 

or correction at many steps along the way. For examples there 

are more test models and time for testing compared to G. 

V. In the early photographic flights, the operation will be attended by 

man and all reasonable attempts are being made to capitalize on his 

capabilities to provide early success and improvement of subsequent 

operations. 

A. lvb.nual backup of critical functions 

1. Focus 

2. Alignment 

3. Pointing 

14. Image motion compensation 

5. Film Handling 

B. In flight failure analysis, limited repair or replacement, and 

feedback for further improvements. 

/ncd C. P. SpoeIhof 

SPECIAL HANDLING
# CE2004078EN.01087201.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/872 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/872

---

(2004/C 78 E/0925)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3888/03

by Jan Mulder (ELDR) to the Commission

(16 December 2003)

Subject:   Winding-up of contracts in the Eurostat affair

Subject:

As a result of the irregularities uncovered earlier this year at Eurostat, on 23 July 2003 the European Commission terminated its contracts with the company CESD-Communautaire. A number of firms worked as subcontractors to CESD-Communautaire. These bona fide subcontractors are in danger of being the victims of the situation that has arisen as a result of claims on CESD-Communautaire not being paid.

| 1. | As the Internal Audit Department completed its screening of all Eurostat contracts on 27 October 2003, can the Commission explain how it intends to deal with claims from bona fide subcontractors of firms whose contracts have been cancelled by the European Commission as a result of the Eurostat affair? |
| --- | --- |

1.

As the Internal Audit Department completed its screening of all Eurostat contracts on 27 October 2003, can the Commission explain how it intends to deal with claims from bona fide subcontractors of firms whose contracts have been cancelled by the European Commission as a result of the Eurostat affair?

| 2. | In its answer will the Commission cover claims on CESD-Communautaire in general, and sub-project RU51NL in particular? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In its answer will the Commission cover claims on CESD-Communautaire in general, and sub-project RU51NL in particular?

Answer given by Mr Solbes Mira on behalf of the Commission

(20 February 2004)

(20 February 2004)

On 23 July 2003 the Commission instructed its departments to terminate its existing contractual relationships with four bodies in accordance with the terms laid down in the contract. However, the termination of the contracts in question did not release the Commission from the obligation to pay the remuneration for the parts of the contracts that had been performed. The bodies were accordingly paid for the services they had rendered where there was no dispute regarding the assessment of the work.

In the case of the subcontractors, as a rule, the relationships between the Community's contractors and any subcontractors they use are governed exclusively by agreements concluded between these parties, and the Community is not bound by such agreements. This is the case with the claims held by the subcontractors of CESD-Communautaire (1) in respect of the project referred to by the Honourable Member. However, in so far as the Commission has paid CESD-Communautaire for the services rendered, there is to the Commission's knowledge nothing to stop CESD-Communautaire paying off any money it owes its subcontractors.

1

---

(1)  ‘Centre européen de formation des statisticiens économistes des pays en voie de développement.’

1

---
exhibit1058.htm






  





  











  













 


Exhibit 10.58


DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE


 


 







 


 







 


 


$200,000                                                                                     Date:  May, 20, 2011


 


 







 


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of Warren Breslow, the sum of Two Hundred Thousand Dollars and no/100 ($200,000.00), together with interest of 10% per annum on the unpaid balance.


 


 


The entire principal and any accrued interest shall be fully and immediately payable UPON DEMAND of any holder thereof.


 


 







 


 


 

 


 


 


”Borrower”


 


Aura Systems, Inc.

















____________________


Melvin Gagerman


Chief Executive Officer







 


Dated: May 20, 2011
# CE2004084EN.01062602.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/626 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/626

---

(2004/C 84 E/0700)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0552/04

by Proinsias De Rossa (PSE) to the Commission

(26 February 2004)

Subject:   Right to collective action

Subject:

What action has the Commission taken in response to paragraph 7(e) of the European Parliament's resolution (P5_TA(2003)0369) of 3 September 2003 on implementing the social policy agenda which urged the Commission to define at European level the right to take collective action, particularly the right to strike?

---
#f'N" ~ 

3BD'MEETI.KG 

REF ID:A67197 

PEHOONJmL OO:NTAOL 00iiiJ.l"TJ515 • 

Kinut.ea of the Meeting 

Held 22 Januar;y 4S 

*l. le9ch Hour. - Jlajor King reported on the progreaa being •de 1n the atud;y 

on lunch hour• required b)l' the graveyard and awing ehi!t personnel. Inrormation 

on the matter th~a tar would indicate that 45 minutes ia required tor the •wing 

•hilt and .30 minutes tor the graveyard shift. Further atatiet~oa are being 

compiled and will be available at the next meeting. 

2. FJ,n;lahed By.ainea•. - Colonel Johnston reported that the COll:amand111£ O!.ticer 

had approved the reconmend&tiona ma.de at the la.st meting. Therefore, General 

Cr.f pt~ic Branch will be assigned ) vacancies in the grade of aecond. 

lieutenant and t.he pool decreased b;y threoi Conmunication• Branch will have an 

increase of 14 oivillan vacanci••J B-IV to be deorea••d •ix and th• pool b;y ten 

oivilian vacancies. 

3. §t&tt Study. - Colonel Johnston 1ntorso.ed the Oorsmittee a ata!'f' atudy 1• 

being made on otticer vacanoiea and the present system. or allocating both gradea 

and positions to the Branohee. 

4. P•ragnnel Branch Jleguest. - Colonel Johnston read a requeat trom Personnel 

Branch tor 16 ofticer vacancies in the g~ade of aecond lieu.tenant. The request 

was set a.side because or onl.7 14 vacancies in the pool and until auch time aa a 

etudy can bo made as to which branch or branehe e could give up position vacancies. 

*5. t?eveloment Branch Hagueat. - Colonel Johnston reported on the request tm m. 

DevelollftBnt Branch which was presented &t the laat maet.ing,. stating that no 

enliated pereonnel are available at th• preaent time. He will confer further 

with Colonel Rosen betoro submitting a recommendation. 

J. w. Johnilton 

Lt. Col., Sig Corpa 

eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 

4-07-2014 ursuantto E.O. 13526
EXHIBIT 21.1

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
As of December 31, 2007

|Company                                   |  | State of Organization |  | Company                                     |  | State of Organization
|----------------------------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|Albuquerque Real Estate Investments, Inc. |  | Delaware              |  | LTC-K2 Limited Partnership                  |  | Delaware             
|Bakersfield-LTC, Inc.                     |  | Delaware              |  | LTC-K2 LP, Inc.                             |  | Delaware             
|Beaumont Real Estate Investments, LP      |  | Texas                 |  | LTC-K2, Inc.                                |  | Delaware             
|BV Holding-LTC, Inc.                      |  | Delaware              |  | LTC-Lake Forest, Inc.                       |  | Delaware             
|Coronado Corporation                      |  | Delaware              |  | LTC-New Mexico, Inc.                        |  | Nevada               
|East New Mexico, Inc.                     |  | Delaware              |  | LTC-Ohio, Inc.                              |  | Delaware             
|Education Property Investors, Inc.        |  | Nevada                |  | LTC-Richmond, Inc.                          |  | Nevada               
|Florida-LTC, Inc.                         |  | Nevada                |  | L-Tex GP, Inc.                              |  | Delaware             
|Kansas-LTC Corporation                    |  | Delaware              |  | L-Tex L.P. Corporation                      |  | Delaware             
|LTC GP I, Inc.                            |  | Delaware              |  | Missouri River Corporation                  |  | Delaware             
|LTC GP VI, Inc.                           |  | Delaware              |  | New Mexico Real Estate Investments, Inc.    |  | Delaware             
|LTC Partners IX, L.P.                     |  | Delaware              |  | North Carolina Real Estate Investments, LLC |  | North Carolina       
|LTC West, Inc.                            |  | Nevada                |  | Park Villa Corporation                      |  | Delaware             
|LTC-Dearfield, Inc.                       |  | Nevada                |  | Skilled Healthcare Holdings, Inc.           |  | Delaware             
|LTC-DS, Inc.                              |  | Delaware              |  | Texas-LTC Limited Partnership               |  | Texas                
|LTC-Gardner, Inc.                         |  | Delaware              |  | Texas-LTC Woodridge Limited Partnership     |  | Delaware             
|LTC-Griffin, Inc.                         |  | Nevada                |  | Vacaville-LTC, Inc.                         |  | Delaware             
|LTC-Jonesboro, Inc.                       |  | Nevada                |  |                                             |  |                      
|LTC-K1 Inc.                               |  | Delaware              |  |                                             |  |                      

---



QuickLinks