alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
' ... /· ,,... 

Q 

• REF ID:A67289 

· ·TQP SECRET 

\ 

HEBTDG CF U. s. REPRESENTATION F<Jl 

BRUSA came COEFERENCE 

Date• -· 

Tim• -· 

l2 September 1950 

1400 to 1515 

Placet 1•'¥1' Communication Station, Lounge 

PBESEft: 

Ram Orade semce -

Earl Eo Stone RADII USN 

Anderson, Jo llo ~ Jro Maj. USAF 

Austin, Fo Civilian 

Barlow, Ho Co Civilian 

Battey, Ro Civilian 

Beck, Wo Fo Civilian 

Belliveau, Go Wo Civil1an 

Blackaten11 Ho Bo J.tajo USAF 

Chiles, Ro Civilian 

Chittenden, To Ro Civilian 

Collins, So Po Colo USA 

Diamond, Herbert Do Capt. USA 

Douglas,, Jo· Ho Civilian 

Enderlin, Ao CDR USN . Erickson, Bo Go Civilian 

Friedman, Wo. p., Civilian 

Gig•1. Fo Wo Lto USA 

Hanaen, Ho Oo CAP? USN 

Hargreaves, Jo ·Ca CDR USN 

Harper, Jo So CAPl' USN 

Horton, Ro Ho Lt ... Colo USA 

KellyJI Fo Ao Go CDR USN · 

lullback, Dr. So Civ.Uian 

Varsh, Lo Civilian 

Page, Ro Ao Civilian 

Parr, Go Eo J(ajo USAF 

Penderr~ass, Jo To LCDR USN 

Porter 1 Go Ao C1vili"1 

Enclosure A 

fef) 5EeREf 

organization 

AFSA 

JCEC 

AFSA..04 

AFSA...0.3 

ASA-.63 

AS~SO 

GAS-52 

AFSA-04 

AP'SA-0.3 

AFSA~4 

AFSA-OOA 

GAS-52 

AFSA~l4 

AFSA...J3 

AFSA..i03 

AFSA .. 14 

ASA..24 

AFSA~4 

AFSA..:.04 

AFSA.-Q3 

A.FSA-12 

JCEC 

AFSA...0.3 

AFSA...03 

AFSA-IJ4 

JCEC 

AFSA=-14 

U-SA....o2 

-@Jo ~o ff£S ga,,. 

Qeclassified and aggroved for release b~ NSA on 05-30-2014 gursuantto E.O. 13529 . . ···------·-····· . . . . . ------------------
'!'9P SSGlm!l' 

l:l.. s. E!BS 0Jftl! 

Name 

-

Prugh, To 

Revane, Hn Jn 

Rhoads, 'llo 

Rosen, Lo 

Satf'ord, L., Fo 

Sanfcrd1 Dro Jo Ac, 

Scott, Ro Jfo 

Seara, Ra Co 

Sf)ller1 Do Wo 

Shaw, Ro Ho 

Sinkov,11 Dro·Ao 

Small, Ao Wei 

Smith, Jo Ao 

Trainor,, To Jo 

Ward.JI Do Co 

wright., Co Co 

Enclosure A 

REF· ID :A6728~. 

TOP SEC~E i · 

Grade 

C~vilian 

Lt. Colo 

C1v111an 

Civilian 

CAPT 

Civilian 

Civilian 

Colo 

CDlt 

Civilian 

Cirllian 

Civilian 

Civilian 

Lto Colo 

LT 

Civilian 

2 

5el'V'ice 

USllC 

USN 

USAF 

USN 

TOP SECRET ----- ---- --· 

Organizati2!! 

APSAc;o;()J 

AFSA--04 

A.FSA-14 

AFSA..-03 

AFSA-11 

AFSA-.JA 

AFSA...04 

AFSAco03 

AFSA-tV,. 

AFSA...04 

AFSA-04 

ASA..J.5 

AFSA~ 

JCEC · AFSA...()4 

AFSA...03
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Frank Jeffery Black, Appellant

No. 06-19-00046-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 8th District Court of 

Franklin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. F8622). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Frank Jeffery Black, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED OCTOBER 16, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-6195

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

TYRONE LAWRENCE HARRIS, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter Dekalb Kelley, Jr., 

District Judge. (2:06-cr-00031-WDK-TEM-01; 2:07-cv-00202-WDK) 

Submitted: May 26, 2009 Decided: June 15, 2009 

Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam 

opinion. 

Tyrone Lawrence Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Robert John Krask, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

Tyrone Lawrence Harris has filed an appeal from the 

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 

(West Supp. 2008) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). 

Because the district court has issued a certificate of 

appealability on Harris’s first claim, whether counsel was 

ineffective for failing to note an appeal, we have considered 

this claim on the merits. Finding no clear error in the 

district court’s credibility determinations, we uphold the 

court’s finding that counsel was not directed to file a notice 

of appeal and did not have a duty to consult with Harris under 

Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 478-80 (2000). We therefore 

affirm the district court’s order in part. 

We will not issue a certificate of appealability as to 

Harris’s remaining claims absent “a substantial showing of the 

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating 

that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

2 
3 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Harris has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability as to Harris’s remaining three 

claims and dismiss the appeal in part. We deny Harris’s pending 

motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED IN PART; 

DISMISSED IN PART
# C_2005031EN.01002101.xml

| 5.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/21

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 23 November 2004

in Case T-360/03: Frischpack GmbH & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Three-dimensional mark - Shape of a cheese box - Absolute ground for refusal - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Distinctive character)

(2005/C 31/41)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-360/03: Frischpack GmbH & Co. KG, established in Mailling bei Schönau (Germany), represented by P. Bornemann, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: U. Pfleghar and G. Schneider) – appeal against Decision R 236/2003-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 September 2003 concerning the registration of a three-dimensional mark (cheese box) – the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of P. Lindh, President, R. García-Valdecasas and D. Šváby, Judges; I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 23 November 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 304 of 13.12.2003.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATESCODE

 

                I, George E. Crapple, certifythat (i) the Annual Report of Nestor Partners (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2007 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such AnnualReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Partnership.

 
|   |   | /s/  George E. Crapple           |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------|
|   |   | George  E. Crapple               |
|   |   | Co-Chief  Executive Officer      |
|   |   | Millburn  Ridgefield Corporation |
|   |   | General  Partner                 |
|   |   | Nestor  Partners                 |
|   |   | March 28,  2008             |
|        |        |                                  |  |

 

 

20

----
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Century Properties Fund XVI(the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of thePartnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financialofficer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

 

This certification is furnished with thisReport pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall notbe deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1914 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act with respect to the 

guidelines for specification of certain disposal sites for dredged or fill material. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 30, 2015 

Mr. KAINE (for himself and Mr. WARNER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act with 

respect to the guidelines for specification of certain disposal sites for dredged or fill material. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Commonsense Permit5 ting for Job Creation Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GUIDELINES FOR SPECIFICATION OF CERTAIN DIS7 POSAL SITES. 

8 Section 404(b) of the Federal Water Pollution Con9 trol Act (33 U.S.C. 1344(b)) is amended— 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1914 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘(b) Subject to subsection (c) of 

2 this section’’ and insert the following: 

3 ‘‘(b) SPECIFICATION FOR DISPOSAL SITES.— 

4 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (c)’’; 

5 (2) by striking ‘‘the Secretary (1) through’’ and 

6 inserting the following: ‘‘the Secretary— 

7 ‘‘(A) through’’; 

8 (3) by striking ‘‘section 403(c), and (2) in any 

9 case where such guidelines under clause (1) alone’’ 

10 and inserting the following: ‘‘section 403(c); and 

11 ‘‘(B) in any case in which guidelines under 

12 subparagraph (A) alone’’; and 

13 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(2) LIMITATION.—Guidelines under paragraph 

15 (1) may not prohibit the specification of a site due 

16 to the lack of a final site plan resulting from the 

17 lack of an identified end user or industry or indus18 trial classification for the site when determining 

19 whether there is a practicable alternative to a pro20 posed discharge that would result in less adverse im21 pact on the aquatic ecosystem.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
REF ID:A64954 

-

?-~~ -? ~'- ·~* s--- ·-«--~ - - .. " 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

ft? ~ PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

~ rCll THE DDECl'Oll~..__ _ __, 

IUBJ.EC'?t lfa&el1n •sotiationa 

Pa:Mftl.rded tor ;your 1ntol"lllat1on ia a further DOte on the 

01ttcome tit the 41acuaa1emt 1'1.th Mr. 1'ox-1• c. w. Jlagel1n. 

JW.n J.. CAlllB I,ieute~t General, W ~ 

l>ireator 

l liu:l! 

8ubJt Jfagel1n Jfegot1&tiona 

l . ·~ " '" -

. '.,.;:.:· - ' 

, 

II 

: J 

Declassified 'and approved for release by NSA on 07-18-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a - :.... - ~T 

··~·-·- ·- -
IUBJECT i &plin lego'tiat1ona 

Jletor•ncef 'J!/S Memo, la. J\l'b 1954,. on 9wne l'U.bJect. 

1. Xn. Pare.graph 2 o.t tM reference it w:a11 inc'Uc:ated that 'both 

Jlr. lagelin cA. the Director, Jf&tional Secur1"Q" Alf.ency thougb.t that a 

period ot a'boUt •ix namtha, to be devoted to t"urther atu.<'1¥ and. cona14era.t1on 

ot the \'ario\18 h.ctor# 41scueeed, Willld be J11Ut~ dAtairabl.e. That period 

-. to termiisate on 30 June JS54~ 

2. ln e~ction vi th th1• period ot •tudy, ve wre to aacertain 

'Vhat practical. ~ement• could be na4e tor proc~i~ M-209 JIJl!l.Chinea 

fron:4 tho \J.B. Signal Corpe, and tar 1ell.U>g them to Mr. laplin, 11' and 

vb.on be desired them· I 

I EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL.86-36/50 USC 3605 

3. tu e. d.iacue•ion or the •tter on 14 June 19;4, tllCll decided 

(a) ROt to Mll ~ K-20<)•a to )bo. Bap1in and (b) tb&t the ))~ctor, 

•ti~l Secur1tf J.&ency vu to im'om Mr. laplill o'L tblJ .Doar4'• inability 

to prov!4e him. vi.th these d.evteea. It vu wggeated by USClB that\ the 

Director, llSA ld&ht villh to ataw that action tu.ch aa d.e&1.red vu pl"Obibited 

by le&&l tecbnica11t1ea. 

- E!lf)tiff celm<>b ...... ~ ot Copie• ..... ----- fl&a. -~ lllP• 
• • 

REF ID:A64954 

TOP ..., . . -· 

IQ!!@!! 

IUB3.BC'21 Jfa&elln legotiatioius 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

- -- eeJPR Qt, atMBBR. ___ _ oon- or "°'m -'· · · · · 

fAQB=ar oew••~ 
¢ci NJ c/s 

v/nm 

mc/P 

P/? 

S/MST 

JIBA--<>62 

M/lh 

REF ID:A64954 

To tollov~ the Memorandum ot 5 Feb 1954 to 

Director 1L __ J to ~ him ad.viaed aa to the outcome 

ot the Hagelin negotiations. E 0 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

TOP
#### Donovan, Plaintiff in error, vs. The State, Defendant in error.

*October 9*

October *26, 1909.*

*Rape: Evidence: Corroboration.*

A conviction of rape cannot tie sustained upon tlie uncorroborated testimony of a prosecuting witness whose story is intrinsically improbable and almost incredible, especially if sbe is a person of feeble mind.

*571ERROR to review a judgment of the circuit court for Jefferson county: George Grimm, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed.*

Eor the plaintiff in error there was a brief by *Gustav Buchheit,*attorney, and *Kronshage, McGovern•, Goff, Fritz <&■ Hannan,*of counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Buchheit*and *Mr. F. F. McGovern.*

Eor the defendant in error there was a brief by the *Attorney General, R.*W. *Luech,*district attorney, and *F. T.. Tucher,*assistant attorney general, and oral argument by *Mr.. Luech.*

Winslow, C. J.

It is not believed that any good purpose would be served by a recital of the testimony in .this case.' The plaintiff in error was convicted of rape. The crime was-, charged to have been committed June 1, 1906, upon the person of one Elsie Weichert, who was then under fourteen years-, of age and was adjudged a feeble-minded person before the-trial. The conviction was based upon the uncorroborated testimony of the prosecuting witness alone, and her story was intrinsically improbable and almost incredible. Under these circumstances the conviction cannot be sustained. The rule in such cases is that “where the evidence of the prosecuting witness bears upon its face evidence of unreliability, to sustain a conviction there should be corroboration by other evidence as to the principal facts relied on to constitute the crime.” *O'Boyle v. State,*100 Wis. 296, 75 N. W. 989; *Hofer v. State,*130 Wis. 576, 110 N. W. 391. Especially must this rule be held applicable in a case where the prosecuting witness is a person of feeble mind.

*By the Gourt.*— Judgment reversed, and action remanded for a new trial.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7116

EDWARD L. HORNSBY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus L. SOLOMAN, Superintendent, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (CA-03-788) Submitted: January 27, 2005 Decided: February 2, 2005 Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward L. Hornsby, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Edward L. Hornsby seeks to appeal a district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hornsby has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
l!\pproved for Release . by NSA on 08_06 2014 pursuant to E .o. 1352a
99-1131.

#### State ex rel. Karlen v. Christley.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,382
<SECURITIES>                                       310
<RECEIVABLES>                                      869
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,349
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,023
<PP&E>                                             678
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,207
<BONDS>                                            957
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,439
<OTHER-SE>                                    (25,410)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,316
<SALES>                                          1,188
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,188
<CGS>                                              595
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      595
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,892
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 327
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,648)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,648)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,648)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

           WRITTEN STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         The undersigned, Deborah C. Wright, is the President and Chief
Executive Officer of Carver Bancorp (the "Company").

         This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2004 (the "Report").

         By execution of this statement, I certify that:

                A)         the Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                           of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

                B)         the information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company as
                           of the dates and for the periods covered by the
                           Report.

         This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report
so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that
this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended.




      June 27, 2004                                   /s/ Deborah C. Wright
      -------------                                   ---------------------
         Dated                                          Deborah C. Wright





* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.