Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Notices 11171 

9See section 782(b) of the Act. 

10See Certification of Factual Information To 

Import Administration During Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 

17, 2013) (‘‘Final Rule’’); see also the frequently 

asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_

info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. 

on entries of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption during the relevant 

provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of 

the order, if such a gap period is 

applicable to the POR. 

Administrative Protective Orders and 

Letters of Appearance 

Interested parties must submit 

applications for disclosure under 

administrative protective orders in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On 

January 22, 2008, the Department 

published Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Documents Submission Procedures; 

APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January 

22, 2008). Those procedures apply to 

administrative reviews included in this 

notice of initiation. Parties wishing to 

participate in any of these 

administrative reviews should ensure 

that they meet the requirements of these 

procedures (e.g., the filing of separate 

letters of appearance as discussed at 19 

CFR 351.103(d)). 

Revised Factual Information 

Requirements 

On April 10, 2013, the Department 

published Definition of Factual 

Information and Time Limits for 

Submission of Factual Information: 

Final Rule, 78 FR 21246 (April 10, 

2013), which modified two regulations 

related to antidumping and 

countervailing duty proceedings: The 

definition of factual information (19 

CFR 351.102(b)(21)), and the time limits 

for the submission of factual 

information (19 CFR 351.301). The final 

rule identifies five categories of factual 

information in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21), 

which are summarized as follows: (i) 

Evidence submitted in response to 

questionnaires; (ii) evidence submitted 

in support of allegations; (iii) publicly 

available information to value factors 

under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure 

the adequacy of remuneration under 19 

CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed 

on the record by the Department; and (v) 

evidence other than factual information 

described in (i)–(iv). The final rule 

requires any party, when submitting 

factual information, to specify under 

which subsection of 19 CFR 

351.102(b)(21) the information is being 

submitted and, if the information is 

submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct 

factual information already on the 

record, to provide an explanation 

identifying the information already on 

the record that the factual information 

seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The 

final rule also modified 19 CFR 351.301 

so that, rather than providing general 

time limits, there are specific time limits 

based on the type of factual information 

being submitted. These modifications 

are effective for all segments initiated on 

or after May 10, 2013. Please review the 

final rule, available at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/

1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to 

submitting factual information in this 

segment. 

Any party submitting factual 

information in an antidumping duty or 

countervailing duty proceeding must 

certify to the accuracy and completeness 

of that information.9 Parties are hereby 

reminded that revised certification 

requirements are in effect for company/ 

government officials as well as their 

representatives. All segments of any 

antidumping duty or countervailing 

duty proceedings initiated on or after 

August 16, 2013, should use the formats 

for the revised certifications provided at 

the end of the Final Rule.10 The 

Department intends to reject factual 

submissions in any proceeding 

segments if the submitting party does 

not comply with applicable revised 

certification requirements. 

Revised Extension of Time Limits 

Regulation 

On September 20, 2013, the 

Department modified its regulation 

concerning the extension of time limits 

for submissions in antidumping and 

countervailing duty proceedings: Final 

Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013). 

The modification clarifies that parties 

may request an extension of time limits 

before a time limit established under 

Part 351 expires, or as otherwise 

specified by the Secretary. In general, an 

extension request will be considered 

untimely if it is filed after the time limit 

established under Part 351 expires. For 

submissions which are due from 

multiple parties simultaneously, an 

extension request will be considered 

untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. on 

the due date. Examples include, but are 

not limited to: (1) Case and rebuttal 

briefs, filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309; 

(2) factual information to value factors 

under 19 CFR 351.408(c), or to measure 

the adequacy of remuneration under 19 

CFR 351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19 

CFR 351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal, 

clarification and correction filed 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3) 

comments concerning the selection of a 

surrogate country and surrogate values 

and rebuttal; (4) comments concerning 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

data; and (5) quantity and value 

questionnaires. Under certain 

circumstances, the Department may 

elect to specify a different time limit by 

which extension requests will be 

considered untimely for submissions 

which are due from multiple parties 

simultaneously. In such a case, the 

Department will inform parties in the 

letter or memorandum setting forth the 

deadline (including a specified time) by 

which extension requests must be filed 

to be considered timely. This 

modification also requires that an 

extension request must be made in a 

separate, stand-alone submission, and 

clarifies the circumstances under which 

the Department will grant untimelyfiled requests for the extension of time 

limits. These modifications are effective 

for all segments initiated on or after 

October 21, 2013. Please review the 

final rule, available at http://

www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/

html/2013-22853.htm, prior to 

submitting factual information in these 

segments. 

These initiations and this notice are 

in accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i). 

Dated: February 24, 2015. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2015–04346 Filed 2–27–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Advance Notification of 

Sunset Reviews 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

Background 

Every five years, pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the 

International Trade Commission 

automatically initiate and conduct a 

review to determine whether revocation 

of a countervailing or antidumping duty 

order or termination of an investigation 

suspended under section 704 or 734 of 

the Act would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

or a countervailable subsidy (as the case 

may be) and of material injury. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
11172 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Notices 

1See Certain Pasta From Italy: Preliminary 

Results and Partial Rescission of the Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review; 2012, 79 FR 50618 

(August 25, 2014) (Preliminary Results). 

2See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘PostPreliminary Analysis of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review: Certain Pasta from Italy’’ 

(October 30, 2014). 

3See Notice of Countervailing Duty Order and 

Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty 

Determination: Certain Pasta (‘‘Pasta’’) From Italy, 

61 FR 38544 (July 24, 1996) (Order). 

Upcoming Sunset Reviews for April 

2015 

The following Sunset Reviews are 

scheduled for initiation in April 2015 

and will appear in that month’s Notice 

of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset Review 

(‘‘Sunset Review’’). With respect to the 

orders on Polyethylene Retail Carrier 

Bags from China, Malaysia and 

Thailand, we have advanced the 

initiation date of these Sunset Reviews 

upon determining that initiation of the 

Sunset Reviews for all of the 

Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags orders 

on the same date would promote 

administrative efficiency. 

Department contact 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings 

Chloropicrin from China (A–570–002) (4th Review) .................................................................................. Charles Riggle, (202) 482–0650. 

Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from China (A–570–892) (2nd Review) ...................................................... Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482– 

5255. 

Crepe Paper from China (A–570–895) (2nd Review) ................................................................................ Charles Riggle, (202) 482–0650. 

Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from China (A–570–886) (1st Review) ................................................. David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136. 

Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India (A–533–838) (2nd Review) ........................................................ Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482– 

5255. 

Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Indonesia (A–560–822) (1st Review) ........................................... David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136. 

Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Malaysia (A–557–813) (1st Review) ............................................ David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136. 

Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Taiwan (A–583–843) (1st Review) ............................................... David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136. 

Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Thailand (A–549–821) (1st Review) ............................................. David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136. 

Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Vietnam (A–552–806) (1st Review) ............................................. David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136. 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings 

Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India (C–533–839) (2nd Review) ........................................................ Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482– 

5255. 

Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Vietnam, (C–552–805) (1st Review) ............................................ Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482– 

5255. 

Suspended Investigations 

No Sunset Review of suspended investigations is scheduled for initiation in April 2015. 

The Department’s procedures for the 

conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth 

in 19 CFR 351.218. The Notice of 

Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Reviews provides further information 

regarding what is required of all parties 

to participate in Sunset Reviews. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the 

Department will maintain and make 

available a service list for these 

proceedings. To facilitate the timely 

preparation of the service list(s), it is 

requested that those seeking recognition 

as interested parties to a proceeding 

contact the Department in writing 

within 10 days of the publication of the 

Notice of Initiation. 

Please note that if the Department 

receives a Notice of Intent to Participate 

from a member of the domestic industry 

within 15 days of the date of initiation, 

the review will continue. Thereafter, 

any interested party wishing to 

participate in the Sunset Review must 

provide substantive comments in 

response to the notice of initiation no 

later than 30 days after the date of 

initiation. 

This notice is not required by statute 

but is published as a service to the 

international trading community. 

Dated: February 23, 2015. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2015–04278 Filed 2–27–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–475–819] 

Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results 

of Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review; 2012 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Department) conducted an 

administrative review of the 

countervailing duty (CVD) order on 

certain pasta from Italy. On August 25, 

2014, we published the Preliminary 

Results for this administrative review.1

The period of review (POR) is January 

1, 2012 through December 31, 2012. We 

find that DeMatteis Agroalimentare 

S.p.A. (also known as, De Matteis 

Agroalimentare SpA) (DeMatteis) 

received countervailable subsidies 

during the POR, and that Fratelli 

DeCecco di Filippo Fara San Martino 

S.p.A. (also known as, F.lli De Cecco di 

Filippo Fara San Martino S.p.A.) 

(DeCecco) received de minimis 

countervailable subsidies during the 

POR. As such, we are applying 

DeMatteis’ rate to the other firms subject 

to this review that were not individually 

examined. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 2, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sergio Balbontin or Joshua Morris, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement 

and Compliance, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–6478 or (202) 482– 

1779, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

In the Preliminary Results, we 

deferred our analysis of certain 

programs to a post-preliminary analysis. 

On October 30, 2014, we issued a postpreliminary analysis memorandum.2 We 

invited interested parties to file case 

briefs and rebuttal briefs following the 

release of the post-preliminary analysis 

memorandum. Only the Government of 

Italy (the GOI) filed a case brief. 

Scope of the Order 

The scope of the Order consists of 

certain pasta from Italy.3 The 

merchandise subject to the order is 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES