11220 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Notices 

1The Real Estate Assessment Center’s (REAC) 

mission is to provide and promote the effective use 

of accurate, timely and reliable information 

assessing the condition of HUD’s portfolio; to 

provide information to help ensure safe, decent and 

affordable housing; and to restore the public trust 

by identifying fraud, abuse and waste of HUD 

resources. REAC undertakes physical inspections of 

all HUD housing. 

Act is found in Title II of Division L of 

the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 

2014 (Pub. L. 113–76, approved January 

17, 2014). HUD’s FY 2015 

Appropriations Act is found in Title II 

of Division K of the Consolidated and 

Further Continuing Appropriations Act 

of 2015 (Pub. L. 113–235, approved 

December 16, 2014). Section 230 of the 

general provisions of HUD’s FY 2014 

Appropriations Act and section 226 of 

the general provisions of HUD’s FY 

2015 Appropriations Act require HUD 

to take certain actions if a multifamily 

housing project with a section 8 contract 

or with a contract for similar projectbased assistance receives a failing REAC 

physical inspection score.1 The 

statutorily required actions apply to 

projects insured by HUD’s Federal 

Housing Administration (FHA) and noninsured projects. The two statutory 

sections are identical. This notice 

advises the public that HUD has posted 

on its Web site the Office of Housing 

notice detailing the required actions that 

HUD must take in accordance with 

section 230. This notice can be found at 

the Web site shown under the Summary 

section of this notice. 

Dated: February 24, 2015. 

Biniam Gebre, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Housing, 

Federal Housing Commissioner. 

[FR Doc. 2015–04261 Filed 2–27–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–67–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

[LLOR930000.

L16100000.DO0000.LXSSH0930000

.15XL1109AF, HAG 15–0052] 

Notice of Intent To Prepare a Resource 

Management Plan and Associated 

Environmental Impact Statement for 

the San Juan Islands National 

Monument 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of intent. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

National Environmental Policy Act of 

1969, as amended, (NEPA) the Federal 

Land Policy and Management Act of 

1976, as amended, (FLPMA) and 

Presidential Proclamation No. 8947 

(Establishment of the San Juan Islands 

National Monument) (March 25, 2013), 

the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) 

Spokane District Office, Spokane, 

Washington, intends to prepare a 

Resource Management Plan (RMP) with 

an associated Environmental Impact 

Statement (EIS) for the San Juan Islands 

National Monument (Monument) and, 

by this notice, is announcing the 

beginning of the scoping process to 

solicit public comments and identify 

issues. 

DATES: This notice initiates the public 

scoping process for the RMP with an 

associated EIS. Comments on issues 

may be submitted in writing until April 

1, 2015. The dates and locations of any 

scoping meetings will be announced at 

least 15 days in advance through local 

media, newspapers, and the BLM Web 

site at: http://www.blm.gov/or/plans. In 

order to be included in the Draft EIS, all 

comments must be received prior to the 

close of the 30-day scoping period or 15 

days after the last public meeting, 

whichever is later. We will provide 

additional opportunities for public 

participation upon publication of the 

Draft EIS. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

on issues and planning criteria related 

to the San Juan Islands RMP/EIS by any 

of the following methods: Email: blm_

or_sanjuanislandsnm@blm.gov; Fax: 

503–808–6333; Mail: 1103 N Fancher 

Road, Spokane Valley, WA 99212. 

Documents pertinent to this proposal 

may be examined at the Spokane 

District Office, 1103 North Fancher 

Road, Spokane Valley, WA 99212; the 

Wenatchee Field Office, 915 North 

Walla Walla Street, Wenatchee, WA 

98801; and the Oregon State Office, 

Public Room, 1220 SW. Third Avenue, 

Portland, OR 97204. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Lauren Pidot, San Juan National 

Monument RMP Team Lead; telephone 

503–808–6297; address 1103 North 

Fancher Road, Spokane Valley, WA 

99212; email blm_or_

sanjuanislandsnm@blm.gov. Contact 

Ms. Pidot to add your name to our 

mailing list. Persons who use a 

telecommunications device for the deaf 

(TDD) may call the Federal Information 

Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 

to contact the above individual during 

normal business hours. The FIRS is 

available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 

to leave a message or question with the 

above individual. You will receive a 

reply during normal business hours. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

document provides notice that the BLM 

Spokane District Office, Washington, 

intends to prepare an RMP with an 

associated EIS for the Monument, 

announces the beginning of the scoping 

process, and seeks public input on 

issues and planning criteria. The 

planning area is located in San Juan, 

Whatcom, and Skagit Counties, 

Washington, and encompasses 

approximately 995 acres of public land. 

The Monument was established on 

March 25, 2013, by Presidential 

Proclamation (Proclamation) for the 

purposes of protecting objects of 

historical and scientific interest and 

enhancing areas of unique and varied 

natural, historical, and scientific 

resources for the benefit of all 

Americans. The Proclamation specified 

that the BLM ‘‘shall prepare and 

maintain a management plan for the 

monument and shall establish an 

advisory committee under the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) 

to provide information and advice 

regarding the development of such 

plan.’’ The purpose of the public 

scoping process is to determine relevant 

issues that will influence the scope of 

the environmental analysis, including 

alternatives, and guide the planning 

process. 

Preliminary issues for the planning 

area have been identified by BLM 

personnel; Federal, State, and local 

agencies; and other stakeholders. The 

issues include those associated with the 

objects and resources for which the 

monument was designated, including 

cultural and ecological values and 

wildlife; opportunities for recreation 

and interpretation; traditional uses and 

tribal interests; land use authorizations, 

such as rights-of-way for access; and 

travel and transportation management. 

Preliminary planning criteria include: 

(1) The plan will adhere to the mandates 

of the Proclamation that established the 

Monument; (2) the plan will be 

developed in compliance with FLPMA, 

NEPA, and all other applicable laws, 

regulations, Executive and Secretarial 

Orders, and policies; (3) public 

participation and collaboration will be 

an integral part of the planning process; 

(4) the planning process will provide for 

ongoing consultation with Native 

American tribal governments and 

strategies for protecting traditional uses; 

(5) the BLM will work collaboratively 

with cooperating agencies and all other 

interested groups, agencies, and 

individuals; (6) the BLM will work 

collaboratively with the Monument 

Advisory Committee established for this 

planning process; and (7) the plan will 

recognize the jurisdiction of other 

Federal, State, and local agencies and 

will encourage cooperative partnerships 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Notices 11221 

1No response to this request for information is 

required if a currently valid Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) number is not displayed; the 

OMB number is 3117–0016/USITC No. 15–5–324, 

expiration date June 30, 2017. Public reporting 

burden for the request is estimated to average 15 

hours per response. Please send comments 

regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to 

the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 

20436. 

with these agencies to support land 

management in the Monument. 

The BLM will use the NEPA public 

participation requirements to assist the 

agency in satisfying the public 

involvement requirements under 

Section 106 of the National Historic 

Preservation Act (NHPA) (54 U.S.C 

306108 (as recodified)) pursuant to 36 

CFR 800.2(d)(3). The information about 

historic and cultural resources within 

the area potentially affected by the 

proposed action will assist the BLM in 

identifying and evaluating impacts to 

such resources in the context of both 

NEPA and Section 106 of the NHPA. 

The BLM will consult with Indian tribes 

on a government-to-government basis in 

accordance with Executive Order 13175 

and other policies. Tribal concerns, 

including impacts on Indian trust assets 

and potential impacts to cultural 

resources, will be given due 

consideration. Federal, State, and local 

agencies, along with tribes and other 

stakeholders that may be interested in or 

affected by the proposed action, are 

invited to participate in the scoping 

process and, if eligible, may request or 

be asked by the BLM to participate as a 

cooperating agency. 

You may submit comments on issues 

and planning criteria in writing to the 

BLM at any public scoping meeting, or 

you may submit them to the BLM using 

one of the methods listed in the 

ADDRESSES section above. To be most 

helpful, you should submit comments 

by the close of the 30-day scoping 

period or within 15 days after the last 

public meeting, whichever is later. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. The minutes and list of attendees 

for each scoping meeting will be 

available to the public and open for 30 

days after the meeting to any participant 

who wishes to clarify the views he or 

she expressed. The BLM will evaluate 

identified issues to be addressed in the 

plan, and will place them into one of 

three categories: 

1. Issues to be resolved in the plan; 

2. Issues to be resolved through policy 

or administrative action; or 

3. Issues beyond the scope of this 

plan. 

The BLM will provide an explanation 

in the Draft RMP/EIS as to why an issue 

was placed in category two or three. The 

public is also encouraged to help 

identify any management questions and 

concerns that should be addressed in 

the plan. The BLM will work 

collaboratively with interested parties to 

identify the management decisions that 

are best suited to local, regional, and 

national needs and concerns. 

The BLM will use an interdisciplinary 

approach to develop the plan in order 

to consider the variety of resource issues 

and concerns identified. Specialists 

with expertise in the following 

disciplines will be involved in the 

planning process: archaeology and 

cultural resources, geology, wildlife and 

fisheries, botany, recreation, and lands 

and realty. 

Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7, 43 CFR 1610.2. 

Jerome E. Perez, 

Oregon/Washington State Director. 

[FR Doc. 2015–04289 Filed 2–27–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–33–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–776–779 (Third 

Review)] 

Preserved Mushrooms From Chile, 

China, India, and Indonesia; Institution 

of Five-Year Reviews 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice that it has instituted reviews 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act) 

to determine whether revocation of the 

antidumping duty orders on preserved 

mushrooms from Chile, China, India, 

and Indonesia would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of 

the Act, interested parties are requested 

to respond to this notice by submitting 

the information specified below to the 

Commission;1 to be assured of 

consideration, the deadline for 

responses is April 1, 2015. Comments 

on the adequacy of responses may be 

filed with the Commission by May 14, 

2015. For further information 

concerning the conduct of this 

proceeding and rules of general 

application, consult the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 

201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 

201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and 

F (19 CFR part 207). 

DATES: Effective Date: March 2, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this proceeding may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—On December 2, 1998, 

the Department of Commerce issued an 

antidumping duty order on imports of 

preserved mushrooms from Chile (63 FR 

66529) and on February 19, 1999, 

Commerce issued antidumping duty 

orders on imports of preserved 

mushrooms from China, India, and 

Indonesia (64 FR 8308–8312). 

Commerce subsequently revoked in part 

the order on imports from Indonesia (68 

FR 39521, July 2, 2003). Following first 

five-year reviews by Commerce and the 

Commission, effective November 17, 

2004, Commerce issued a continuation 

of the antidumping duty orders on 

imports of preserved mushrooms from 

Chile, China, India, and Indonesia (69 

FR 67308). Following the second fiveyear reviews by Commerce and the 

Commission, effective February 28, 

2010, Commerce issued a continuation 

of the antidumping duty orders on 

imports of preserved mushrooms from 

Chile, China, India, and Indonesia (75 

FR 22369). The Commission is now 

conducting third reviews to determine 

whether revocation of the orders would 

be likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury to the 

domestic industry within a reasonably 

foreseeable time. It will assess the 

adequacy of interested party responses 

to this notice of institution to determine 

whether to conduct full or expedited 

reviews. The Commission’s 

determinations in any expedited 

reviews will be based on the facts 

available, which may include 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES