alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32

EMULEX CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emulex Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 28, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Paul F. Folino, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| |                                                          | 
| | -------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | /s/ Paul F. Folino                                       | 
| |                                                          | 
| | Paul F. Folino
Chief Executive Officer
February 10, 2004 | 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emulex Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 28, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Michael J. Rockenbach, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| |                                                                 | 
| | --------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | /s/ Michael J. Rockenbach                                       | 
| |                                                                 | 
| | Michael J. Rockenbach
Chief Financial Officer
February 10, 2004 | 

60
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00270-CV

Leticia R. BENAVIDES,

Appellant

v.

Shirley Hale Mathis, as Temporary Guardian -Trustees of the Benavides Family Mineral 

Shirley Hale MATHIS, Individually and as Temporary Guardian of

the Person and Estate of Carlos Y. Benavides, Jr., an Incapacitated Person,

Jesus Guillen, and Julio A. Garcia, Jr.,

Appellees

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-PB6-000081-L2

Honorable Jesus Garza, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED.

It is ORDERED that appellees Shirley Hale Mathis, Individually and as Temporary 

Guardian of the Person and Estate of Carlos Y. Benavides, Jr., an Incapacitated Person, Jesus 

Guillen, and Julio A. Garcia, Jr., recover their costs of appeal from appellant Leticia R. Benavides. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.4.

SIGNED March 26, 2014.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
~·~"' ... 

. 

9!=: . 

-~­ _,...... . 

-

---

i. 

--

I '._ 1-,Jio ... ~ ,,.:,-- -

'tor ~.......... .~ 

-·· .. ' 

. 

" . .. -: .... , 

-· . . . I • ,._ r • 

~.~ WARbiENT OF THE IAvi · OFFICE 01 'lUE CHIEF 01 HA VAL OPERATIONS 

·co~ 

Vuhin.:.to11 25., n, c. In Reply Reter to 

OP .... )2J.K/mc 

serial 002SJ.OP32 

SECRET 29 HQ' 19S2 

S!e:Be'f 

Pzomr Chief ot laval Oporat.ions 

Toa Dizreotor. A19ed FOl'Ges seourit)' Al/f!/OffT 

Subj a P.elease tc Turkey of Cryptographic Dev.lee 

IDcl.1 (i) Copy Chairman" SD·M!CC Mmo of 30 April l9S2 

1. Enclosure (1) baa been re!erred to t.he Navy M811lber of the StateDefense MUitary Into~.r.iatiou Control Co::md.tte~ tor OOQfdin•ttQQ_._ 

2. The TurkiS.h Oovonmont represontatiTe:s who havo approached the State 

Depart.r.ient havG no technical knowledge ot any ot our Cll';iPtogl"apbic devices 

and are mai nlJ interests! in acquiring a seoun Qlltm tor thoir diplomatio ':'·channels. 

J. lour co.nmicmt is desired u to what can be made available to them vhiah 

w.Ul mee'fi the requiramonf,s am i.t' the devices can bo dalivered at an urJ.7 

date. 

4. Tho Statp Departmnt has informed. the Navy Deparimont that it ia boing 

pressed tor a reply. lour early rep'.cy' to thia letter vo11ld be appreciated. 

S. Return ot enclosure (l) is request.sl. 

.SBEHtft'" 

9!elfftl!f Bi'eRHATlOll 

-/a/MOH'B!J'& a. DUMLL 

B7 direct.1.cn 

~~ - ·--· 

-~ -J
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 95-5926 JAMES A. CLEMENT, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Elizabeth V. Hallanan, District Judge. (CR-92-195) Submitted: May 14, 1996 Decided: August 6, 1996 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSELHunt L. Charach, Federal Public Defender, C. Cooper Fulton, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, J ohn L. File, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION PER CURIAM: James Clement appeals the district court's order revoking his supervised release and imposing a sentence of twenty-four months incarceration. Clement contends that the district court clearly erred when it found that he had violated the terms of his supervised release 1 by committing a second-degree sexual assault2 upon an elderly woman at the nursing home where he was employed. Finding that the district court's factual determination was not clearly erroneous, we affirm. At the revocation proceedings, the district court f ound the victim of the assault to be highly credible and her testimony compelling. The victim testified that Clement forcibly assaulted her while giving her a bath alone in her room at the nursing home. When she told Clementto stop, Clement refused. Additionally, the nursing home administrator and director of nursing testified to the victim's reputation forveracity, and that they had never known her to lie, exaggerate, or suffer from delusions. Further, the victim's description of the assault remained consistent from the time she reported the assault until she testified in court. Under such circumstances, we cannot find that the district courtabused its discretion in revoking Clement's supervised release; therefore, we affirm the district court's revocation of Clement's supervised release. 3 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

_________________________________________________________________ 1 18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(e)(3) (West Supp. 1994). 2 W. VA. CODE § 61-8B-4 (1992). 3 See United States v. Stephenson , 928 F.2d 728, 731 (6th Cir. 1991).
2
USCIB: 5.3/99 

2JJ June 1955 

TOP SECft!T - tJ.S. ::m!'.S CllLY 

MFMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Approval ot Minutes or 3oth Meeting of USCIBEC. 

USCIB 5.3/95, dated 15 June 1955. 

l. Subject to corrections listed below the minutes of the 3oth meeting 

ot USCIBEC are approved: 

Page 7, in 6th paragra.ph, words "8.l\,d New Zealand" deleted • . Page 12,, in 4th paragraph, last sentence rewritten. 

New pages 7 and 12 are attached tor insertion in their appropriate places. 

2. It is requested that the word TENTATIVE be deleted f:ran the iz1itial 

page of' the minutes for each item oonsidered and the word FINAL substi1;uted therefor. · 

USCIB 

Correotion sheet. 

USCIB: 5 .'3/99 

TOP SECRET 

eclassified and a roved for release b NSA on 09-05-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352 

24 
.. 

' 

TQP HSR.m' g,s, EH8 GlN:E.¥ 

THIRTIETH MEErING 

OF THE 

USCIB EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 

Page, Para 

ot Final Cop:v 

Page 7, 

Para 6 

Page 12, 

Para 4 

Tentative: 

Final: 

Tentative: 

Final: 

C~CTION SH;H;ET 

TEXT (Tentative and Final) 

11 ••• liaison in Australia and New Zealand 

on a Cc.MINT basis ••• 11 

" ••• liaison in Australia on a COMINT 

basis ••• 11 

11 ••• He has been inf'ormed, he continued, 

that we have been able to limit our 

11 ••• He had been informed, he continued, 

grade a very sm 1 number of instruc .· on 

documents which are provided to the 

operators. He asked that/this possibility 

be examined." 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

F.nclosure with USCIB 5.3/99 dtd 29 June 1955. 

TOP SECRET 

FORM A7031 SEP 97 

.. , .. "' Pi4n-FM-001-5622
.T REF ID:A71925e 

N'iA7lV~ 

h* DitsOJ"i}'Uon (SCAMP) 

9t>9C1'\l Oomrdttee ad.Tt11tar. on MathelM'1cU. PPObl•• 

Al!!Ong \he A.J'8&1 M be e~lond ~• 

•thou ot tt0lTing 111:1.\rlx sou.nUon1 of \he 

\1'P9 rl JU a Be 01' Hh of t!lo\Vltlonl of \he 

t;rre X-1 R1 I s A.1 , when the oon1\nnta i.8 

an t~•&l'J' • 

.U.o x-1 Jt• y-lr .. \ nrtx : B1 , \. 

fird\e 1ulleUtut1~n group11. 

~) CC.binatorlal !ooolo~, eir.uing \he ooarpuUone r!e1crtbi~ gl";'lph1 in thft t11nnll. 

t\) Log!C<ll ndur.Uon of hypothesPfl. Given 8 l.aJo.t& 

a R'1ir ue eontident or ineon111a\ftnt, \o ftn.4 

the laJ"Cfl9' eubH' of T'"i""he eonshten\ 1\-.te-

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 02-11-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
-

t :r: 

.. , " 

\ l ,... 

1 r I 

l t 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 08-29-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

---~~G 
REF 

? '"'"Ii•- •T"'IWUZ 

\ .- -::.;.: _::;~~ 

_ __ ____ A4 _ I
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000351532
<NAME> INTERFERON SCIENCES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       7,895,647
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  298,125
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,981,761
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,278,922
<PP&E>                                      13,586,676
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,482,106
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,818,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,511,968
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       152,347
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,153,874
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,818,189
<SALES>                                        329,548
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               329,548
<CGS>                                          203,386
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  203,386
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,617,379
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,083,534)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,083,534)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,083,534)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.47)
        

</TABLE>
Mr. ffi'tnr.f Ji:., ~n 

14 Mill Rend 

Me.pl~ Srode, Ne1r Jeraey 

De~ Mr. l.engen: 

REF ID:A65421 

310 Socond Street, S.E. 

Waehine;ton 3, D. C. 

More tMn tvo mntb.5 have paeaed. •ince "l!if';I' utter or 

24 ll'et-:ru-,ry 1954 e.rd I d.o not w.nt you t.o think that I 

der::tdcrt t.? n.tm-~t.'1 about l'"O'W: l'equeet 'by t'ili:og it. 

M;y 4ift'!cu1ty in ptt.i.ng a dt'dinite tUUNer tm.• you 

in !'e$peOt to your l"!Jque•t ia that, u 1ou per~a a:N 

w:U awnre 1 th& ~curity el.a.asit:l.es.t:f.on If£S1IBIC'ND '\11!'1.a 

elil'li't~ted •om months ago by Ex~autive Ord.er and untONJe1'n cor::pli.cattOM have ar1a~n aa ti nault. ?f9Y, the 

txtens1on c:ourne11 wre RES'!RICTED in security clastJ:ltication 

but. lrith the ~lim.'\.nat!on t'Jt that alMa!ficatiou they bl.Ye 

had. to be -.1'.e OONF'!.DEN'rIAL. It ~na thll.t the rulee: tor 

ea.f'egua.rdi.ng CO!WIDID'l'l'IAJJ nia.terial incl,~.e 1 IL~ othe~ 

th1.?1£$, the rc~Ui:re1':1ent tllft.t auch m!'.'ttt:ial 'be at.ol"ed. in a. t~~eomb~t1.on N.fo a.n1. ah<> tMt th:te aa.te and t~ 

p:rtm1HB in Yhieh. it iJJ lcept 111U.Bt be in$pe~ by ·~ 

•uthority h9.vi~ tM- power to do ao. I vould. not w.nt to 

-put yo>..\ to all of the trouble that would be involved b;y the 

t"orego1ng.. e.e lor,g ae thcra ~cmd to lXt a hopo of •~ .revision ot tb<t pal.icy vith r•~ect to the Mcu.i•ity cl&seitication CONFI!lSl'ttL\L. Du.t to 4-w tl'Mlt •xpeoted rcvieion 

bu not M~riali-iedJ htmc(J you -vill und.er~te.nd the d.ehy 

in givirie you a d4fin1te answr. Pl~•e- eontin1Je to be 

:pat.ient,J l v1ll let you knW ... 9(1(»'.1. U l knOV the &11#1leX". 

My attention te.s bel'tn ca'tlcffi. to thct A:pr11-May 19~4 

issue or "The Cx'}-ptogra.m.H vi th its front cover and. th(: third. 

note OP the l.Mt ~e, pe:r~ining to tho front cover e.rt. 

Wou.1.4 it °t'O' e.t all ~t1bl• tor you to MM I'*' #. "et of the10 

npr00u.et1orJ.B to •e.11 whether there 4r¢ OXl.l' people uound here 

Yho aJaht b~ intereet«d. It not, I could r•turn the •et in 

.- good a condition as received.. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
,, --

Colonel L. C. Slllet.•t USl.1 

USAF .Air tbl1'f'Oni tq 

.Ur Comanard and Stat£ Scmol 

llect.roiaiDa D1Y1a1Ga 

REF ID:A67393 

Hl.X\f6ll Air FOl"Ce Bue. .u ..... 

Daar Larq& 

Pol.loving up on our telephone conYOrsatl.on lut. veek, I • 

mw vrl.tuc to ad:r:J..se ;rau u to t.be date and tilll8 or •Y arr1Yal. 

TaJd.D& tb& Crescent l•'fi:r>6 a-t 6110 p.a. on Jlcodq, 9 Karch, I 

a due to &n"iva 1n Hon~r:J' at. U11.o a.111. on 10 Harcb. &i.Dce 

I a echedUled to g1ve "1 \alk on ll Karch• I all bave • ~­

houn w si-net in N'riewlni .,,,- all.des, e"ks. 

We can dac.tde on vbetb.ar to wse t.be ~or attemoon 

pe.rioda .tor rq talk atter Df¥ arriYal 1n 'liotm. 

Roping :rou can wt• at the ftilroad station and lootfn& 

forward to -.1n& 7011_, I •• 

CCI AO 

c~ 

S/MSl 

VIUIAM F. PRIEIJWI 

8peo1a'L A•.S.•tlllt 

M/R: SeU'-explanatoey". 

w.F .Frisdman/S/ASST/&JlQl/4 Mar 53 - eb7 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-30-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HECTOR L. RESSY,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

KING COUNTY; D. BENEVENTE,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-35584

D.C. No. 2:11-cv-00760-MJP

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Marsha J. Pechman, Chief Judge, Presiding

 Submitted May 14, 2013** 

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges. 

Hector L. Ressy appeals from the district court’s summary judgment in his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that he was treated roughly and handcuffed too

tightly during his pre-hearing detention for a probation violation. We have

FILED

MAY 22 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Arpin v. Santa Clara

Valley Transp. Agency, 261 F.3d 912, 919 (9th Cir. 2001), and we affirm. 

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Ressy’s excessive

force claim because Ressy failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to

whether Benevente’s use of force was unreasonable. See Gibson v. County of

Washoe, Nev., 290 F.3d 1175, 1197 (9th Cir. 2002) (“[T]he Fourth Amendment

sets the ‘applicable constitutional limitations’ for considering claims of excessive

force during pretrial detention.” (citation omitted)); LaLonde v. County of

Riverside, 204 F.3d 947, 961 (9th Cir. 2000) (the extent of the injury inflicted on

the plaintiff is relevant to the reasonableness inquiry).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Ressy’s cruel and

unusual punishment claim because Ressy failed to raise a triable dispute as to

whether Benevente maliciously and sadistically used force to cause him harm. See

Wilkins v. Gaddy, 130 S. Ct. 1175, 1178 (2010) (per curiam) (extent of injury is

relevant to Eighth Amendment inquiry); Simmons v. Navajo County, Ariz., 609

F.3d 1011, 1017 (9th Cir. 2010) (“Although the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due

Process Clause, rather than the Eighth Amendment’s protection against cruel and

unusual punishment, applies to pretrial detainees, we apply the same standards in

both cases[.]” (internal citation omitted)).

2 12-35584
The district court properly granted summary judgment on Ressy’s

negligence claim because Ressy failed to raise a triable dispute as to causation. See

Folsom v. Burger King, 958 P.2d 301, 308 (Wash. 1998) (“In order to establish

actionable negligence, a plaintiff must establish: (1) the existence of a duty owed to

the complaining party; (2) a breach of the duty; (3) resulting injury; and (4) that the

breach was the proximate cause of the injury.”); Fabrique v. Choice Hotels Int’l,

Inc., 183 P.3d 1118, 1122 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008) (expert medical testimony is

necessary to establish causation where the nature of the injury involves medical

factors beyond a lay person’s ordinary understanding).

AFFIRMED. 

3 12-35584
---- REF ID:A67204 

Dt"• UAl.W L o. ~ 

vs. 

dootr.=o..~ 

Pllllddoclt .-1 OOftoft1 ~ 

Oonml~~ 

~ar.t_r-atc 

~or. ~ 

As I 1~ tio !NU an tho ~OA Gt FJr Yimt. ~t 

w ~ tol!' ... -~a~~. el i<l orde' to 

1U1'1ate 

ab~ sta~t, 

~ ~---.,."Otbtat' - r.tN4 

'td.t.."1 

a 

lis~ 

e-~\e end~~ ln o~r w aacd.$1. 

30V- itt tbo ~loft "t t.~ w Pi~, I M ~ UllO :11' v'Uiteb 

w htrfQ 1aoe..~ def.a obta.11\94 t'nt. A."l old pl.!) 'tt•t. le ""'*" ~ to ~t.. in t.ho tUeo Sn ~aot-4--r,~ ?lCdUc i'iU 1-"l OY0..."7 bl.a.+.,.. ~ 1t 1110 ()~ {.14tafllld r'GllQ ta "InappUcahl.o.• ~ CO[!\M ..... 

ba1~ ~dad ~ ..,. '\hat, ,JOU 'MT ~ill Ol» «apletad OfYfl1 foryoA:/I' <Ma~ nlcc. 'fill tl*:r~'1t. ~ Q.L1. bO «Qll~tcd. 0\. .ct.V" 

po.Uco at.4t!.one N1'V106 ~~ co:\ter1 oe ui.UU aott'f'ltrw 

f\fo cartl:!t 11."ii G0nt. 7~ b.-;~h. f'Jt vh.1.ch ON ft::> be 1°\$.U'10d. t..> fM"Ultsto 

tho o~ 1n tr.-o eve.~ a pL"in' 1t1 ~"l!d. r~ ~- tie ~ c!•b:ld in w4 er& l.»tb ~-· 

~ 

I ~- l'Jitttr .oll. tn.~ v:Ul bill an ~ 'tiat tiut. it. 1. 

400 I hOpO 7t1t1 tdll tJO'- t:tm it. ~ l!IJCU of o:a itil:OIP fttJ.1•-. 

lll. d.ontnr:. I w!.t!l ~ ~H ta:: ~blilQ ~ a:.U to GMUl'O 

Jot& t!•t. ~ plAo;I.... ,~ la Q p:Rd.td.oa. to be tit ~ ta 

'QO con t» ti .tot..l ooat.r.t.tut4.on w 1.:• ca~ dat.-.o. 

~. 

ursuantto E.O. 1352
• 

REF ID:A609006 

TOP SECR:ET W 

~fr~L--

SUBJECT NUMBER 

USCIB: 2!}.13/6 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Item 4 of the Agenda for the 21st Meetihg 0£ US~IBEC, 

held on 22 October 1954. 

Subject: ----.......... ------'(USCIB29.13/3; USCIB 29.13/4). 

(Note: While this item is reported separately, the members 

of USCIBEC were agreed that it has a direct bearing on the 

succeeding item (Item 5) and, accordingly iconsidered the 

two ~tems together.) 

THE CHAIRMAN introduced USCIB 29.13/3 for discussion and reviewed 

the vote sheet replies to it as contained in USCIB! 29.13/4. He 

suggested that if the members were willing to agree upon deletion of 

subparagraphs 2e and 2d of the enclosure with USCIB 29 .13/:3 the proposal could then be sent to the Boa;t"d. 

'MR: P9ii¥ZSIBES dett'b'bed bhab ! esoiallion of bhe p1 ublem eocdd be so 

exda1~. ..c.St ,Po»'. S: ?J)hcf. 

MR. PATTON stated that his principal is unwilling to increase the 

quid pro quo, and recor.nnends that thel fbe told at a high level 

that we do not propose to dicker further concerning it. He expressed 

the opinion of OSD that we have already paid, many times over, for the 

material we want, and our approach should be that instead of increa.fing 

the guid pro .9!!2. we are prepared to withdraw support if the_ • _do 

not come through with what we expect of them. 

MR. BATTEY commented that, through MDAP, such a large volume of 

communications equipment has been made available to the! !that 

they probably are not interested in any more. 

The brief ensuing discussion resulted in agreement by the members 

to recommend USClB approval of the enclosure with USCIB 29.13/3, subject to deletion of subparagraphs 2c, 2d, and all except the first 16 

words of paragraph 3. 

DECISION: (22 October 1954) USCIBEC noted the views expressed by the 

Defense member, and agreed to recommend USCIB approval of the enclosure 

with USCIB 29.13/3 subject to the following deletions: 

a. Paragraph 2c 

b. Paragraph 2d. 

c. All except the first 16 words of paragraph 3. 

This item to be dropped from the agenda. 

USCIB: 29.13/6 - 8 -

T06." SECRET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-24-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7561

ROBERT LEE WHITE, Petitioner - Appellant, versusEDSEL TAYLOR, Warden of MacDougall Correctional Institution; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-97-2378-3-23BC) Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 12, 1999 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert L. White, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert L. White seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See White v. Taylor , No. CA-97-2378-3-23BC (D.S.C. Sept. 17, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
• REF ID:A1012~ 

SUB.1ECT1 ReleaH ot Cryptographio Principlaa 

tot Cbiet, Al'IV SeeuriV Agenoy 

Assi8'tant Chief ot Start • 0.2 

., 

7 Jul1' 1950 

The poll07 announoed 1n lfellO tor the Chiet, Al'll1 Secu:r1'1' 

lgenq, da'ted 29 April 1946, fJtoll the Acting Deputy, .lC ot 8 1 

0.2, ent1:tl.ad •Bel.eaae or CrJ'ptocraphic P.rinoiplea• is hereby 

reeolnde4. 

/a/ .a.. a. Bolllnc 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 08-05-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a