alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1488 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1488

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to allow for fair 
application of the exceptions process for drugs in tiers in formularies 
           in prescription drug plans under Medicare part D.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 3, 2015

Mr. Nelson (for himself and Ms. Collins) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to allow for fair 
application of the exceptions process for drugs in tiers in formularies 
           in prescription drug plans under Medicare part D.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Part D Beneficiary Appeals Fairness 
Act''.

SEC. 2. FAIR EXCEPTIONS PROCESS FOR DRUG IN TIERS UNDER MEDICARE PART 
              D.

    Section 1860D-4(g)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-
104(g)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence--
                    (A) by striking ``for tiered cost-sharing for drugs 
                included within a formulary and'' and inserting ``for 
                any tiered cost-sharing structure within a formulary 
                (including a structure that''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``, or provides for different co-
                payment or coinsurance amounts for drugs in different 
                tiers included within the formulary)'' before ``, a 
                part D eligible individual'';
            (2) in the second sentence, by inserting ``in any plan 
        formulary'' before ``could be covered''; and
            (3) by inserting the following before the last sentence: 
        ``In no case may the Secretary allow a PDP sponsor to make any 
        element of the tiered cost-sharing structure (including a tier 
        used for very high cost or unique items) ineligible for lower-
        cost sharing through an exception under this paragraph.''.
                                 <all>
```
. - -····--..-·....-..·· ··-·· . ... .._............·-···-··-·- -- -· -·· -· ·-·- --·. - ... -- .. -------

.. .:.;~~l:"" 

~ ~--

r

;, I t ~--· , . . "'·~· 
---·-------.--·----·-----------·---------------------------

. - . REF ID: A33551. 

' ------ - - - --- - - - - - - - - ... - - - - - . --- - - - -- -- . --
Order entered February 4, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01618-CV

HENRY S. MILLER BROKERAGE, LLC, Appellant

V.

RUTH MAE SANDERS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-14901

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s January 29, 2015 unopposed motion for an extension of 

time to file a brief requesting an extension until February 2, 2015. As of today’s date, 

appellant’s brief has not been tendered to this Court. Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s 

motion. On the Court’s own motion, we ORDER appellant to file a brief in this accelerated 

appeal by FEBRUARY 11, 2015. 

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
.. 

REF ID:A99876 

'J.:he reply to my notes on the ADFGVX suggests a new method - an "Assumption I 

of Wi~th" method. It mg,y be that this method would work very wail, but no 

examp~e of it was given. From a superficial consideration I c~nnot help 

I 

thinking there would be considerable difficulty in determining which ot the 

I 

assume!d widths is correct, and still more difficulty in deciding where the I 

short 'columns come. In any case, however, this is not the method I was 

writin'g about. I 

!~e point that the difference in frequency or v and x in the two tables 

I 

differentiates their siml1ltaneous a?pearance from the repetitions at 14:-15, I 

I 

etc. i~ well taken. At the s9.JJle time, I cannot help thinking that the I 

importbce of the phenomenon is over-stressed. · The fact that the letters 

I 

( 

occur in contradictory positions back to b~ck is of no more significance 

than w~uld be their occurrence in contradictory positions elsewhere. •bus, 

I 

are weito conclude from the fact that we have X in messages~ 

I 

III an~ XI at 124 (even) and Vin both.messages at 127 {odd), that 124: 

i and 12~ do not belong in the sarue column? If we do so conclude we.:-:..re 

i 

wrong,· and if we do not so conclude vie are inconsistent. 

I 

' i;am disap?ointed to find no removal of my doubts about the reasoning as !to the break at 55. the sentence following figure 4 refers no 

I doubt ~o the V's and X's back to back. ~ow G and F are also character-

' I istic 1etters; but look at 96-97 in messages III and VII. Look also 

at the V's F's and X at 1~8-150. I 

Let nothing disguise the fact that I admire the solution of the 

' 

,message~. My only doubt is as to the g~neral nature of the solution. 

P. s~ No mention is made of what would be done if the first letters 

! 

providyd no reversals - as might readily be the case. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-30-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

·.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 13, 2018

NO. 03

- 17

- 00543

- CV

Randal B. Ward, Appellant

v.

Suzanne Banowsky McCaskill, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROS E, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD REVERSED AND REMANDED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on April 26, 2017

. The parties have

filed an agreed motion to reverse and remand the case to the trial court. Having found that there

was reversible error in the trial court’s judgment , the Court grants the parties ’ motion, reverses

the trial court’s judgment

, and remands the case to the t rial court for further proceedings

consistent with this Court’s opinion

. The appell ant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both

in this Court and in the court below.
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: May 12, 2008
    /s/ Christina W. HaganChristina W. HaganExecutive Vice President, Secretary and
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer)
l~- REF ID: A66854, -, t I _ 

-' 

WlpftW o.r,r.J. ~ R• 11•1\t,, ~"? 

Ct iilllW 

L 

~a.,.,..._ la AU 1Cl'Oe ~- ~ 

~~,i... 

JW ~1 3lullott• 

Ga W\plf of ~ s;.c:!el ~ ~. I wr1' "1 eap!'IGI 

... 

w • 

dtlGP 

1.be ~~ oemmion ot ... 

ot .... 

~ 

~!.t:!l 

v1.al.t to~ 

&;.l;~ ~. 

c~ 

~ 

Tbo 

llrbt!-,p eJd Ute ~t. :li~".ttl ...... 1-t'te:r 

~ 

d•t&-A~ ~ tt. ~ ~ ~ Au hrve :!MUrl.\r 

ml lb Nlet!en tr> \ha oUwr 'f~..a -of _. .,.._ •11ld.-t1an. 

I 1d.ah ~lJ t.o h-'lk ;w rw •kSrG it JliMll!d'bl.tJ 

W Caloml t.tUdea to~ '11 Oft \J•l"ct f'w\ itl aa Wir• .. Jfl1 

• * ,.,. l\ ~b\as ~ us to get. ()11 \ho apot. 

• • ft to ~ t4 U. q\llDt!ons ~1 eelS1 up ~ tllZt' 

.U...lUiM\9 ... 1.,\h .. ~ ~-, \.~ Mil Ma faidl'c-!.ti ~ tll9 mt1N ~ :.. lilell at oat ...,... to• ta 

e1rtd.eatm. 

~ i/.ASST (2) 

Pl'Ct!f Rober~on o/o s/AS~ 

lf/a.1 lelt-e;q>b!'\$tol";Y"' 

•· ~ ... ~·n 

'J t_!al :;.w_y Gnap 

g • ..,.~cn/consA AU& 53-Gb:r 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-20-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
I 

I 

} 

I 

I 

a 

t 

I 

I 

I 

~ 

f 

l 

~--- -

REF ID:A62966 

Mr. Lee !. Grove 

Cd'ord. Utdwrai~ P.re.u, :tnc. 

114 l'ttth Avenue 

Jrew York ll, •v tork 

x.r Mr. Orovo• 

7 AprU 1955 

-.Ceipt ot XQU" lett.er ot 31 March .19~5, ad.&'eued 

w ~l.Qnel lU 31 su r.. !'riedm.n bl e..re or the Tolger 

lbake•~ 14'bJ'a.x7, ia a.ck.Dovadged. Your ,._ recalls 

to 11& 1i.bat w have rMd. art1cl.efJ under 1our by-llM 1D 

ti. W.abSagton }'gat iii~ put. 

~ ;you ~ mch on 'behalt ot both or u.a tor 

reur cc:mpatulation.s &ta4. :rour atereet in publication ~. W.. ~ wable at tbe -=ent t.o go 1uto t.be -.tter 

ot vhateve:r- Uitereat Qxf'ord Uniwr•ity Pre1• ld&ht lave 

1n om" -.nuael"ipt. ~~JOU -.ga~n. 

Ci~ ;voura, 

Ef pproved for Release by NSA on 06-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
Exhibit 99.1

                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of J Net
Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Allan R. Tessler, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:  February 14, 2003    By: /s/ Allan R. Tessler
                                 ____________________
                                 Allan R. Tessler
                                 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

     This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 27, 2018

Order 

Clerk

September 27, 2018

152934(74)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 152934

v COA: 321806

Saginaw CC: 13-039031-FC

ERIC LAMONTEE BECK,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellee to file a sur-reply is 

GRANTED. The sur-reply will be accepted for filing if submitted on or before October 

11, 2018.
a..i- ~ e.e. looper, tl1M (Jtet.) 4415: G&rtt.l.4 ltroet., 1.w. Vuh1~, D. e, 

Oear ~ral. llooptra 

In~ tQ 7QUr .. -rahtp on. the hltteQ!'iil'Jtni~tiono 'tanctl ct 

ta. lattono.l &leur1-tyr l./fpnq 9Cleut.it1o Mviaor;y JQar41 1 .. w17 

pl.aaed to be t&ble to tell 70'1 \bat. the l*'OCe••ins ftqu1ntd tor si-=t-

~ acceu to •ttc:mal. !e=uri~ ~ at.ter• hos 'Men ~· 

we voul4 now Uluf to ecquaiut JOU with the kl&hltght. ot our 

«m:'nmt ~at.ion and. ite .Wf, u4 _. & a.tta!l.M J!N-.ntation 

f.ft 90M ~OW" ~bet~ p:ro'bleml. A two--~ rt.i't to tbie Aeancy 

tihou.ld be tutt1ci.t:t ten: tht. pur;oto, NJ4 it ~ w ~at. 

.,. 'tiae ~t to 10\l• 

It JOU Yill 1-t •bow three or four voek• bl~ of the 

a.Re JOU would liq t.o alQt ~i• 11.9.tt., u4 tell• \bode ct 

trcntl yov. prater, w Y1U lw.Y1t the a&ee•~""Y invitatioao.l. ~ 

.-nt to JOl.l • 

Vith ecrd.!e.l p-eettnp M<1 hopiaa to nmv ow- acquaintance, 

? u, 

CCJ 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-16-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

............ __________ ~_
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.02

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus constituting part of this
Registration Statement on Form S-1 of our report dated May 26, 1999 relating to
the financial statements of DSL.net, Inc., which appear in this Prospectus. We
also consent to the references to us under the headings "Experts" and "Selected
Financial Data" in such Prospectus.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
June 7, 1999
Exhibit 10.2.2

 

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

Amendment (this “Amendment”) dated as of April 29, 2011 to Agreement dated as of July 30, 1999 by and between Universal American Financial Corp. and Robert Waegelein.

 

RECITALS

 

1.               Universal American Corp. (formerly known as Universal American Financial Corp. and now known as Caremark Ulysses Holding Corp. “Old UAM”) and Robert Waegelein (“Executive”) are parties to an Employment Agreement dated as of July 30, 1999 (the “Original Employment Agreement”).

 

2.               On April 29, 2011, CVS Caremark Corporation purchased Old UAM, including Old UAM’s Medicare Part D business (the “Part D Sale”).

 

3.               In connection with the closing of the Part D Sale, (i) the Original Employment Agreement was assigned by Old UAM to Universal American Corp., a Delaware corporation (formerly known as Universal American Spin Corp. and referred to herein as “New UAM”), effective as of the closing of the Part D Sale and (ii) the Board of Directors of Old UAM approved an amendment to the Original Employment Agreement providing for enhanced severance to Executive following a termination following a change in control.

 

4.               New UAM and Executive desire to enter into an Amendment to the Original Employment Agreement (the Original Employment Agreement as amended by this Amendment being referred to as the “Employment Agreement”) on the terms and conditions set forth below.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, New UAM and Executive agree as follows:

 

1.               The Original Employment Agreement was duly assigned by Old UAM to New UAM effective as of the closing of the Part D Sale and the parties to the Employment Agreement are New UAM and Executive.

 

2.               The words “an additional lump sum payment equal to one-half the Executive’s Base Salary” appearing in Section 8(c)(iv)(x) of the Original Employment Agreement are deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following words “an additional lump sum payment equal to two times the Executive’s Base Salary.”

 

3.               Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, the terms, conditions and provisions of the Original Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

 











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of April 29, 2011.

 

	
Universal   American Corp.
    	
 
    	
Executive
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   Richard A. Barasch
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Robert A. Waegelein
    
	
Name:   Richard A. Barasch
    	
 
    	
Name:   Robert A. Waegelein
    
	
Title:   CEO
    	
 
    	
Title:   CFO
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.5


                           BRADLEY REAL ESTATE, INC.

                            ARTICLES SUPPLEMENTARY



Bradley Real Estate, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the "Corporation"), hereby
certifies to the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland that:

     FIRST: Under a power contained in Section 7.5 of the Articles of Amendment
and Restatement of the Corporation (the "Charter"), the Board of Directors of
the Corporation (the "Board of Directors"), voted at a meeting held on September
14, 1999, to reclassify 200,000 shares (the "Shares") of 8.875% Series C
Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock as 200,000 shares of
undesignated and unclassified Preferred Stock (as defined in the Charter), which
reclassification shall be reflected in Article VII of the Charter upon any
restatement of the Charter.

     SECOND: The Shares have been reclassified by the Board of Directors under
the authority contained in the Charter.

     THIRD: These Articles Supplementary have been approved by the Board of
Directors in the manner and by the vote required by law.

     FOURTH: The undersigned President of the Corporation acknowledges these
Articles Supplementary to be the corporate act of the Corporation and, as to all
matters or facts required to be verified under oath, the undersigned President
acknowledges that to the best of his knowledge, information and belief, these
matters and facts are true in all material respects and that this statement is
made under the penalties for perjury.
<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused these Articles Supplementary
to be executed under seal in its name and on its behalf by its President and
attested to by its Secretary on this 22nd day of October, 1999.


                                    BRADLEY REAL ESTATE, INC.



                                    By:    /s/ Thomas P. D'Arcy
                                       ----------------------------------(SEAL)
                                       Thomas P. D'Arcy, President

ATTEST:


/s/ Marianne Dunn
---------------------------
Marianne Dunn, Secretary
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
    
                              CONSENT OF KPMG LLP     
                              -------------------


The Board of Directors of Bradley Real Estate, Inc.:
----------------------------------------------------

We consent to the use of our report dated January 28, 1998, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Bradley Real Estate, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes in share owners' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 1997 and related schedule, which report
appears in the December 31, 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bradley Real
Estate, Inc., our report dated April 9, 1998 related to the statement of
revenues and certain expenses of Redford Plaza for the year ended December 31,
1997, our report dated May 7, 1998 related to the statement of revenues and
certain expenses of Courtyard Shopping Center for the year ended December 31,
1997, our report dated May 7, 1998 related to the combined statement of revenues
and certain expenses of Camelot Shopping Center and Plainview Village for the
year ended December 31, 1997, our report dated May 29, 1998 related to the
statement of revenues and certain expenses of Salem Consumer Square for the year
ended December 31, 1997, our report dated May 29, 1998 related to the statement
of revenues and certain expenses of Holiday Manor Shopping Center for the year
ended December 31, 1997, our report dated June 1, 1998 related to the statement
of revenues and certain expenses of Ellisville Square for the year ended
December 31, 1997, and our report dated September 2, 1998 related to the
statement of revenues and certain expenses of Clock Tower Plaza for the year
ended December 31, 1997, incorporated herein by reference and to the reference
to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the prospectus.

                                        /s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
    
February 3, 1999
Ex-10.2






EXHIBIT 10.2




WRIGHT MEDICAL GROUP, INC.


FIRST AMENDMENT TO


FIFTH AMENDED AND RESTATED


1999 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN




     WHEREAS, the Company adopted, effective as of December 7, 1999, the Wright Acquisition
Holdings, Inc. 1999 Equity Incentive Plan (the “1999 EIP”), which allows for the grant of
equity-based awards in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, and
other incentive compensation arrangements to employees, directors and consultants of the Company
and its subsidiaries in order to provide them with incentives and align their interests with those
of the stockholders of the Company;



     WHEREAS, the Company amended and restated the 1999 EIP effective as of July 6, 2001, May 13,
2003, May 13, 2004, May 12, 2005, and May 14, 2008 (the last of which is the Wright Medical Group,
Inc. Fifth Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan, referred to herein as the “Plan”);



     WHEREAS, Paragraph 15 of the Plan provides that the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors may at any time, or from time to time, amend the Plan in whole or in part; and



     WHEREAS, it is now desired to amend the Plan to reflect amendments to the Plan that have been
approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.



     NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority granted by Plan to the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of October 23, 2008, as follows:



     1. Paragraph 2(m) is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following language:



          “Fair Market Value” on a given date means (i) if the Stock is listed on a national securities
exchange, the closing price of a share of Stock reported as having occurred on the primary exchange
with which the Stock is listed and traded on the date prior to such date, or, if there is no such
sale on that date, then on the last preceding date on which such a sale was reported; (ii) if the
Stock is not listed on any national securities exchange but is quoted on an automated quotation
system, the closing price of a share of Stock reported on the date prior to such date, or, if there
is no such sale on that date, then on the last preceding date on which a sale was reported; or
(iii) if the Stock is not listed on a national securities exchange nor quoted on an automated
quotation system, the amount determined pursuant to one of the methods set forth in Treas. Reg. §
1.409A-1(b)(5)(iv)(B)(2), as elected by the Committee.



     2. Except to the extent amended by this amendment, the Plan shall remain in full force and
effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this First Amendment to the Fifth Amended and
Restated 1999 Equity Incentive Plan to be executed on behalf of the Company as of October 23, 2008.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	WRIGHT MEDICAL GROUP, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Gary D. Henley
 	 
	 	 	Gary D. Henley 	 
	 	 	President and Chief Executive Officer