alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          14,568
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,515
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     12,837
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,134
<PP&E>                                          92,756
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,031
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 143,402
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,443
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           825
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   143,402
<SALES>                                         30,545
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,545
<CGS>                                           25,542
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,478
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 735
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,568)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (875)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,693)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,693)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)
        

</TABLE>
([l 

(") 

(l) 

fSJ 

fSJ 

::::!"! 

([l 

o_ 

(l) 

::J ' o_ I 

(l) I 

--, 

0 

< 

([l 

o_ 

' 

-· o, 

--, 

(D I 

([l ' 

(l) 

fSJ 

([l 

CT 

z 

(f) 

P: 

o' 

::J 

0 

0) 

I 

-->. 

0) 

I 

t'0 

0 

-->. 

h 

c' 

--, 

fSJ 

c 

(l) 

::J 

..-..-

.-T 

o. 

mJ 

0 

-->. 

w 

(J1 ' 

t'0 I 

' 

I 

' 

' ' 

~--, 

., 

<:..' _, ,........ 

_;;,,.. 

_.... 

.......... ' 

, '1 

' 

·-. 

<' t·• 

'· '
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         152,143
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,787,808
<ALLOWANCES>                                    26,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,819,307
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,079,387
<PP&E>                                       4,484,127
<DEPRECIATION>                                 534,355
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,751,975
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,735,343
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,067
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,529,565
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,751,975
<SALES>                                      9,533,416
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,628,562
<CGS>                                        6,148,457
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,597,198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             276,091
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,492
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (57,654)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,492
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
EXHIBIT 99.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the December 31, 2002 Form 10-K/A of Cornell Companies, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harry J. Phillips, Jr., certify that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This
certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906 and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cornell Companies, Inc. and will be retained by Cornell Companies, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

| | /s/HARRY J. PHILLIPS, JRHarry J. Phillips, Jr., Executive Chairman,
Chairman of the Board and Director
May 14, 2003
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
~L 86-36/50 USC 3605 

lirSil!'~ 

I I 

Scn1or United lillgdom Lt&ilOD JJ.a1.an Ottic9r 

kiti*h Jo1Dt 8en1cea M1••1cm 

Main laYJ luilcUQS 

WaahiJ:lgton 2$1 D. c. 

n.r heddys 

I am gratetul tor Cop,y ~ S ot O.C. a. c.a • .:ta.pmen 

Diplomatic &action Jfi.tory and 1n thanking 70'.t tOJt it l feel 

l · llwul.d l!lake certaitl t1-t tho •terial is lntend.ed to 'be 

liopt here tor our Technical Library Md. Biatorieal. Gdt. 

It lt u QOt to 1Do ntdDed.1 p1-..o in • 1uaov u4 1 wtll 

... tba.t it i• promptly :teturned. 

llIJ.1,:tAH 7 • 11UlttWf 

lpec1al A111atant 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352f3------ ~
-·- -· -- . ---

-· - ---- _ _._ _____ _,___..._...._ __ .:....~:t.... - -----'"--------·'" . -:r:.""z~"::...-·~.:.:.::_:_ ___ :_ ... ·~·· .,.. .. ~ ~--

___ @'pp rove~ f~r Rel.E'.ase by NSA on 04-07-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a_:..L_:_:·· -~....,.:_ .... &·=~::r•s.1;49
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 27, 2009

s0518 

# Order

May 27, 2009

137327

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137327 COA: 278372 Kalamazoo CC: 06-001566-FC MARCUS DEON OGDEN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 31, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
• 

\ 

.. 

REF ID:A67180 

Subj: O££iee 0£ Communication Security Representation 

on the Classification Advisory Panel 

In 1Q'" opinion the aubjeot Panol eh.Guld have pomanent rathel' than ad hoc 

· representa:tion from the Office r4 Oorrnnd.oat1on 5eour.ttq. I tharetoro concur 1n 

tho roquost ma.de 1n par. 1 ot CCD:1Cllt NO. l ..i aur:geat. ht,_ it' J'Cll aleo concur, 

a revision or ltlA MED>rm.Dm no. lo-61 bo iesuod to include Ul8 rap.rosentaU.on 1miaatcd 1n par. 2 ot CCllll!!Jent Ho. l. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-20-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

________________________________ 

Case No. 5D23-3518 

LT Case No. 2002-CF-068623-A

________________________________ 

GREG O. SANDERS, 

Appellant, 

v.

STATE of FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

_______________________________ 

3.800 appeal from Circuit Court for Brevard County. 

Charles G. Crawford, Judge. 

Greg O. Sanders, Palm Bay, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Stephen R. 

Putnam, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellee. 

March 5, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). 

EDWARDS, C.J., JAY, and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur. 
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
-

-· --·-· .. ' 

. r -

~-

.. ' 

-~ 

Cbia.r. security 

Control Division 

---· ~~F- rn : A6-a 2 o ti ·~ _ .

,?\ ___ r~---~~ij(-f§ ~=:-•£C :-~--~~- _--_i-.,,.,_ 

Cert.U'ication of Ptblic Law 513 

Consultant 26 June 1952 

In acconla.me wi t.b A.FSA Manoraixlum No. 120-18/l., certification tba t public 

law .5lJ bas been reVieved by all personnel assigned to the 0£.fice or the 

Consul tm t is herewith submitted. 

'. 

' i 

i 

WILLIAM F. FRIIDMAN Consult~t 

~ - ..... - ... -~-=-.::~ 

l 

=:- eclassifi ed and a roved for release b NSA on 06-13-2014 ursuantto E .0. 1352 ::.,- ______ -'-~--====--~=====~-~~~;_; __ ~r~~-i-:::_;E, ~"-~-~--~-!liiiill~~~,!l .... ~~~~!--~~=:_~__!..=:__
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         232,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,555,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   164,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,809,000
<PP&E>                                      15,080,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,093,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              69,266,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,187,000
<BONDS>                                     74,189,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (16,629,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                69,266,000
<SALES>                                     46,820,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            46,820,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,321,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            21,721,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          12,629,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (11,851,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (11,877,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (11,877,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.27)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.3
 
                         CONSENT OF WALLACE A. CATALDO
 
  The undersigned hereby consents to his election as a director of Linkage
Solutions, Inc., following the closing of the company's proposed initial
public offering of its common stock, and consents to be named as a director
designee of the company in the prospectus related to such offering.
 
  EXECUTED as of March 12, 1999.
 
                                          /s/ Wallace A. Cataldo
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Wallace A. Cataldo
#### John KIMBROUGH et al., Appellants, v. William WILSON et al., Appellees.

No. 77-1689.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted June 13, 1978.

Decided June 29, 1978.

*216Elbert Dorsey, Bussey, Collier & Dorsey, St. Louis, Mo., for appellants.

Charles W. Kunderer, Associate City Counselor, St. Louis, Mo., for appellees; Jack L. Koehr, City Counselor, St. Louis, Mo., on the brief.

Before GIBSON, Chief Judge, and LAY and HEANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

John Kimbrough and three other black employees of the St. Louis, Missouri, Street Department brought this action on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. They alleged that the defendant officials of the Street Department maintained policies, practices and customs of discrimination against them on account of race. After a three-day trial, the District Court1 entered judgment in favor of the defendant city officials.2

The employees contended that the rating, disciplinary and promotion systems of the City have been operated in a discriminatory way inimical to their interests. In addition, they claimed that the City maintained racially segregated teams of workers. The evidence put forward by the employees was characterized by ambiguity and vagueness. By contrast, the City defendants introduced concrete evidence refuting the allegations of discrimination.

We have carefully considered the record, and the briefs and arguments of the parties. We are satisfied that the District Court applied correct principles of law and that the factual findings of the District Court are not clearly erroneous. The judgment is affirmed on the basis of Judge Regan’s well-reasoned memorandum opinion.

Affirmed.

1

. The Honorable John K. Regan, Senior United States District Judge, Eastern District of Missouri.

2

. The District Court opinion is published at 435 F.Supp. 1095 (D.C.1977).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         367,839
<SECURITIES>                                   598,039
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,120
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 975,077
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,843
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     940,234
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   975,077
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               260,817
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  190,030
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 70,786
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             70,786
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    70,786
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    10.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Klee, Appellant, vs. Stephenson, Respondent.

*January 9*

January *29, 1907.*

*•Guaranty: Statute of frauds: Promise to answer for det>t of another: Memorandum: Consideration.*

1. Whether, under the facts stated in the opinion, notice of acceptance by plaintiff of a memorandum of guaranty was necessary in order to charge the defendant with liability as guarantor, not determined.]

2. A written instrument: “R. S. agrees to assume one-half of W. S.’s liability under the above guaranty,” fails to express any consideration, and hence is void under subd. 2, sec. 2307, Stats. 1898. It is at best merely a promise to answer for the debt of another person.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Douglas county: Ohaeles Smith, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

For the appellant the cause was submitted on the brief of *G. H. Winsor*and *Archibald McKay,*and for the respondent on that of *R. I. Tipton.*

*506Winslow, J.

This is an action upon a written guaranty. The ease was tried by the court and the facts were not in dispute. One Baillie, a merchant tailor at Superior, desired to purchase goods on credit of the plaintiff, a merchant in New York. In order to obtain credit Baillie, on the 17th day o,f July, 1902, procured one Sims to sign a 'written guaranty by the terms of which Sims, in consideration of the sum of one dollar paid by the plaintiff, guaranteed to the plaintiff payment of all indebtedness which might become due from Bail->lie to the plaintiff not exceeding $300 for the period of one year. At the foot of this guaranty the defendant signed an agreement in the following words:

> *“Rufus Stephenson*agrees to assume one half of Wm. Sims’ liability under the above guaranty. This is to be in force for one year only from above date, July 17th, 1902.”

The two agreements were delivered to the plaintiff, who thereupon sold goods to Baillie during the following year upon credit, upon which a balance of more than $300 remained unpaid at the time of the commencement of this action. The defendant had no notice or knowledge that his guaranty had been accepted by the plaintiff or that any goods had been sold to Baillie relying thereon until about the time of the commencement of this action. Judgment was rendered for the defendant on the ground that his agreement was simply an offer of guaranty which had never been accepted, and the plaintiff appeals.

We express.no opinion upon the somewhat vexed question whether notice of acceptance hy the plaintiff was necessary to charge the defendant with liability as a guarantor. In our judgment it is certain that the written instrument fails to express any consideration, and hence is void under subd. 2, sec. 2307, Stats. 1898, because it is at best merely a promise io answer for the debt of another person. This follows necessarily from the decisions of this court. *Taylor v. Pratt,*3 Wis. 674; *Huston v.*Field, 6 Wis. 407; *Parry v.*Spikes, 49 *507Wis. 384, 5 N. W. 794; *Comm. Nat. Bank v. Smith,*107 Wis. 574, 83 N. W. 766; *Rowell v.*Smith, 123 Wis. 510, 102 N. W. 1.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
EX-10.5








Exhibit 10.5




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

FOSTER WHEELER LTD.

AND

UMBERTO DELLA SALA




     This FIRST AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement between FOSTER WHEELER
LTD., a Bermuda company (the “Employer”), and UMBERTO DELLA SALA (the “Executive”), dated as of
March 1, 2008 (the “Employment Agreement”), is made and entered into effective as of October 1,
2008.



     WHEREAS, the Executive and Foster Wheeler Continental Europe, S.r.l. (“FWCEU”) have agreed to
terminate their fixed term employment agreement (the “FWCEU Agreement”) by mutual consent effective
as of September 30, 2008;



     WHEREAS, the Executive and Foster Wheeler Global E&C S.r.l. (“FWGE&C”) have agreed to enter
into a new fixed term employment agreement with the same terms and conditions as those in the FWCEU
Agreement effective as of October 1, 2008; and



     WHEREAS, the parties each desire to amend the Employment Agreement to reflect the
above-described change in the Executive’s subsidiary employer from FWCEU to FWGE&C and to
contemplate any further similar such changes in the Executive’s subsidiary employer.



     NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Employer and the Executive by executing this Amendment
hereby agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:




	1.	 	The first and second “Whereases” of the Employment Agreement are hereby revised to
read in their entirety as follows:






     “WHEREAS, the Executive is currently employed by Foster Wheeler Global E&C S.r.l. and
may come to be employed by one or more other Italian affiliates of the Employer
(collectively, and each, the “Italian Subsidiary”);




      WHEREAS, Executive’s employment relationship with the Italian Subsidiary is
collectively governed by Italian law, the Contratto Collettivo Nazionale Dirigenti Aziende
Industriali which is set to expire on December 31, 2008, and any extension thereto or
successor contract (the “National Contract”), an Italian employment contract, and the
applicable Italian Subsidiary policies and procedures;”



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment effective as of the date first
above written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	FOSTER WHEELER LTD.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Raymond J. Milchovich
 

	 	 
	 	 	Name:  Raymond J. Milchovich	 	 
	 	 	Title:    Chief Executive Officer	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	/s/ Umberto della Sala
 

     Umberto della Sala
-··-

Mr. W:lll.:tam J. Mito'bel 

Preeident 

Ac:me CQ4e C~, Inc. 

'Pf West 33d Street 

lew l'crk J., New Ycrrk 

Deer Mt'. Mitcbelt 

REF ID:A6477""6 

310 Second Street, 8.E. 

Waehington 31 D. c. 

fQl's;ive mo t~ 'IJJ3" ~ reeponse to i't>U:r" l.etter ot l tk:ptelllb~ 

195i..,, wicb. gave ~ lDUeh :plee.IJure to :read. 

?our recollection ot our le.at meet~ i• C!cxtree't; t w •t briet- ~ at 'llfl brother•• ot:rice on Jr(8dvb.y. 

Your otter or $7. 50 per cc:py tar tlle U'1Q• a I have 18 fail' 

enough e.nd. 1 aece.pt it. All the 'boob -.:re in .mint condition. Just 

u aoon ae ttractica'ble., I'll •hip thea to you.1 ,ro'bablY by •om& 

tl'ucJd.D.g line. :t 1 ll let 70U k.nov all necesaa.r;y •bJnixag date. in 

&d'V'a.nOe and vill be gl.e.d to rece1'Ve your check after an.-1ve.l Qt the 

books b ~- •htq>e. 

t~ coxzana:ntp &bout the cQllDercial eoCle buainees in general 

corroborate vbat % f-=11; to.cm -.tter air mil le1"V'ice es.me into 

exutence .. And JWV1 vith vorl,d .. vide ah na1l aervice ae ~cellent 

u l tind it to 'be I.1• 11.tt'l>l"ieed. that aey col!IDerc1al code conpaey> 

e;r even the C0?11Derc1al. cable ai¥l ~o coq>aniea can ms.kc a livir:lg. 

You vere ver1 ee.rt to go into tbs book-jobb!Dg buaiueea earfy. I 

vo-uld be glad to have f\\rtber 1nt'ormt1on about your business. 

What tnes ot booka? llo ;you put wt a catalogt It 10. I'd like 

to HO a CCIJY'• 

1'ha..uk. yc;iu tar 70'lU' nice invitation to v1Sit your ple.ce ot 

'bwlineaa. I pt to Bew York very i.nb'equently DOW.daya, ao don't 

look tor :nie #OOn. OJ,. the ~ ha.rl41 40 1ou ca.c to 'W'aehington 

now at.14 thenf 1.t .eo, 1'4 have mu.ch pl.ea.sure in taking you to 

l\'ln.Ch or dinne:r. 

:aoc.?1;.roca.til'Jg you.r cordial greatinas to Mrs, hied'llln and 

~elt, I am 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-17-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a