alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-1173

_____________________________

AMOS TAMBUNGA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

William F. Stone, Judge.

February 12, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Amos Tambunga, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
# CE2004088EN.01019801.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/198 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/198

---

(2004/C 88 E/0204)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0649/04

by Esko Seppänen (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(8 March 2004)

Subject:   Roma people in Slovakia

Subject:

Has the Commission noted the measures adopted by the Slovakian Government to cut the social security entitlements of local Roma people and the consequent unrest, ‘inter alia’ in Trhoviste, and does the Commission consider the human rights policy of the Slovakian Government to be in accordance with the policy required of an EU Member State?

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(21 April 2004)

(21 April 2004)

The Commission has noted the introduction of a new social benefit system in Slovakia that has led to a significant reduction of the social benefit payments since the beginning of March 2004. It has also been concerned about the Roma unrest and looting in Eastern Slovakia.

In general, the Commission obviously rejects the use of any kind of violence as a way of making social or any other claims. The Commission has been in contact with the Slovak authorities on this issue and has expressed its hope that the Slovak Government will urgently use all the means at its disposal to reach a reasonable and measured outcome to this sensitive issue. Particular attention should be given to ease the hardship of the poorest sectors of the population which are likely to suffer most from the reduction of the benefits. Job opportunities should be enhanced in the poorest parts of the country and in Eastern Slovakia in particular. In this context, the Commission welcomes a 14-point paper presented recently by the Slovak Government on ways to improve the situation of the most disadvantaged citizens, particularly Roma. The Slovak authorities have also reassured the Commission that they will closely monitor police behaviour in the east of the country.

The Commission is determined to support the Slovak authorities as far as it can to solve this issue as soon as possible.

---
National Reconnaissance Office Release #13-22

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Dec. 23, 2022

Office of Public Affairs

703-808-1198, media@nro.mil 

Edwards appointed and confirmed as next NRO Inspector General

CHANTILLY, Va. – The Honorable Terrence Edwards has been appointed by President Biden 

and confirmed by the United States Senate as the next Inspector General (IG) of the National 

Reconnaissance Office (NRO).

The NRO Office of Inspector General is an independent oversight office that promotes economy, 

efficiency, and effectiveness in the administration of NRO programs and operations. It also 

investigates allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse or other serious problems in NRO's 

operations and keeps the director of the NRO and Congress fully informed.

Edwards most recently served as the chief of staff to the principal deputy director of national 

intelligence. In 2016, he became the deputy general counsel for management in the Office of the 

Director of National Intelligence where he oversaw the provisioning of legal advice on a wide 

range of national security issues.

Since 2005, Edwards has held a number of other legal positions within the federal government, 

including senior attorney at the National Security Agency, senior acquisition attorney at the 

Communications Electronic Command, and attorney-advisor at the Army Sustainment 

Command. Edwards is the recipient of numerous commendations, including the Presidential 

Rank Award. He holds a Juris Doctor from The Ohio State University, a Master of Science in 

Business Administration from Texas A&M University Texarkana, and a Bachelor of Science

from McNeese State University. Read his full biography. 

Edwards succeeds the Honorable Susan S. Gibson, the first presidentially-appointed and senateconfirmed IG for the NRO, who served from 2016-2022. 

###

The NRO develops, acquires, launches, and operates the world’s best intelligence, surveillance, 

and reconnaissance satellites to secure and expand America’s advantage in space. We are 

building a diversified and resilient architecture of spacecraft and ground systems designed to 

meet the challenges of a changing space environment by accelerating innovation and leveraging 

strategic partnerships, backed by a diverse and highly skilled workforce. At NRO, we see it, hear

it, and sense it so our nation’s warfighters and policymakers have decision advantage amid 

increasing global competition.

Learn more at NRO.gov.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-80-2014]

      ( print page 11632)    
On October 28, 2014, Komatsu America Corporation submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board for its facility within FTZ 127—Site 3, located in Newberry, South Carolina.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (79 FR 67414-67415, 11-13-2014). The FTZ Board has determined that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification is authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: February 25, 2015.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-04494 Filed 3-3-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
REF ID:A67377 

'1'll'J.'Aml 

llDRl'mS W 1'111 SICOID MllftllO OP 'lBB 

ISA BCBIICAL t10URIAL IDD'ORJAL !OLier BOARD 

28 JAlURY 1955 

__r-7 

Mr,. WU Up 'J1 o Priectmn1 CJla.1rmD ~ -:~---::--=-~ s/IJJl!lt 

Hr. Pnncis A. BaYeD Ha> CoJ.oael~•pB .. ~npeu m 

Dl"o llarol.cl Jc Stuke7 mac 

Dl"aBovardB.Campr.1gae Rm 

Dr. Iav.rence Bo Sb'nn P/P 

Mro laldbroD D. Call'whoa !ID 

llro W11Ua• Ao Jcmes BC 

Captain I.T. llcDomld• USAI', Bxecut1w SaCl'eta17 S/ASS'I 

lo 'l'ba !dmtea at the amet!Dg c:4 l.4 Jall1'&1'7 1955 vare rev1eWdo 

It WU agNe4 that 'the first scmt.elllCe of 3b sbou1d be ctaenpl to reed,g 

"Die tecbrdcaJ .level. to which the 3ml ahcul4 haw 1ta 

grw.teet appeal shoul4 be th&"' ot a os-11 ad higher,, but t.be 

3ounal sq CODta1n en ocaae1cmal enlc:le ot 1.Dteren to 

peraoaael of e. lcftr ln'elo" 

It was turtbar agreed 'that tb9 head1Dg of )a~ ~ph 3e(l) 

aho1ld be changed to reacl: 

"eo ~ion of Joumal 

(1) Distri'baticm v1ll be lilld.tecl to 'thmle teemdcal 

perammel ot RSA. who request it 'b7 applieaticm em. whme .a~lom 

are apptUV'ed.o later on, techl:d.rel per80Dlle1 of omQ _,-be aclded. to 

the clistr1but1oDo" 

2o Atter the toregoiDg cba.Dpa vare llade9 til3 ~sot the preceding 

a:nUns were appravecl .. 

3.. 'l'be SUbcmmd.ttee then eubm1"84 a tenta'tive .'job df.!ecr1pt1cm tor 

the poaltlon o£ ManagtDg Btitar. After som cU.seumB!on0 ~ Job description 

vu tcmta.t.iw~ accepted.. It wae agreed that ~. Jaus vOlll4 haw auttieiellt 

copies reproduced and clistributeci to the Board. mmben ft:111 tbe:lr CODS1den.t1oll 

prim- to the amct Board meet~. 

4c It vu agreed, for secmri\y reaaaam9 tha't no ppan submitted. to 

tbe JOID"ml voul.d be plbliabed t.'1tbout the MSD'MDCe l!Jlf tb EA Office 

concernedo 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 05-30-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
REF ID:A67377 

5o It. was agreed that a •mcS"S Ids.tor sboul4 fira't 'be obta1md 

u4 then be ebml.4 help decide on the deairecl lavel and quallt1ce:t.i.c:ma 

at his aaaietalrto 

60 Copies ot sneral auaaeaatul prateeaiwnl .101ll"mla were raubmi~t.eci 

to the loar4 tor their CGMide:ratioD. It ,.. egne4 tbl.t tbe oopS.ea \fOlal4 

be circ\llatei tor turt.bez' zw1n _. the ..-.n ot the kvc1 pr1ar to the 

mx't Jl88t,1Dgo 

&o It 1a8 agreed tbat. a s1mgla column tcnmi.t wml4 be 

preferable SD tbe Jaunalo 

7o lt vu 4eotd84 tla't tbe ti'tlal of tba Jcunal ~ 'bez 

!l'be Jbt.ioml &aeurit)' APfll:Y TICBIIQ\L~ 

80 Die Da:Ct meUl!g o.f the Jomod WU S~ for o83Q GD ~D 

J., Pe'bruar.v 19J51 in Boom ]S..eJ&4. 

- - - ----------------
eightk07182011exhibit102.htm




Exhibit 10.2


 







AMENDMENTS TO GRANTOR TRUST PROVISIONS OF


 MDCP, MICP and 2009 PSSP


 


    WHEREAS, Progress Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into the Agreement and Plan of Merger with Duke Energy Corporation, dated as of January 8, 2011 (the “Merger Agreement”); and


 


    WHEREAS, the Merger Agreement requires the Company to amend certain nonqualified deferred compensation plans and any related grantor trust agreements to eliminate the requirement to fund the benefit obligations under such plans in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.


 


    WHEREUPON, after discussion and upon motion duly made and seconded, it was unanimously:


 


    RESOLVED, that effective as of the date hereof, Section 11(b) of the Progress Energy, Inc. Amended and Restated Management Deferred Compensation Plan is amended by adding the following sentence at the end thereof:


 



	 	Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, the Company shall not set aside funds, revocably or irrevocably, in one or more grantor trusts in connection with the transactions described in the Agreement and Plan of Merger between the Company and Duke Energy Corporation dated as of January 8, 2011.	 





 


    RESOLVED, that effective as of the date hereof, Section 14 of Article VI of the Progress Energy, Inc. Amended Management Incentive Compensation Plan is amended by adding the following sentence at the end thereof:


 




	 	Nowithstanding the preceding sentence, the Company shall not set aside funds, revocably or irrevocably, in one or more grantor trusts in connection with the transactions described in the Agreement and Plan of Merger between the Company and Duke Energy Corporation dated as of January 8, 2011.	 





 


    RESOLVED, that effective as of the date hereof, the last sentence of Section 2.7 of the Executive and Key Manager 2009 Performance Share Sub-Plan established pursuant to the 2007 Plan (the “2009 Sub-Plan”) is amended to read as follows:





 




	 	Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 2.7, the Company shall establish no such trust if the assets thereof shall be includable in the income of Participants thereby pursuant to Section 409A(b); and provided further, that the Company shall establish no such trust and shall not set aside shares of Stock or cash, revocably or irrevocably, in connection with the transactions described in the Agreement and Plan of Merger between the Company and Duke Energy Corporation dated as of January 8, 2011.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 233 (Monday, December 5, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75939-75940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31159]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7707]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Works of Art Coming to the U.S. for Exhibition''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C.

[[Page 75940]]

2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs 
Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 
U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 
1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as 
appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I 
hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition 
``Works of Art Coming to the U.S. for Exhibition,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to agreements 
with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the 
exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan Museum 
of Art, New York, NY, from on or about January 9, 2012, until on or 
about January 9, 2022, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues 
yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that 
Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: (202) 
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: November 29, 2011.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-31159 Filed 12-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
# CE2004084EN.01065201.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/652 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/652

---

(2004/C 84 E/0735)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0673/04

by Proinsias De Rossa (PSE) to the Commission

(9 March 2004)

Subject:   Third level education charges for EU citizens

Subject:

In Irish third level education, students considered as non-EU citizens often pay three times more in fees than their EU citizen counterparts.

Is the Commission aware that the Irish Government has not yet informed citizens of accession states, currently hoping to begin third-level education in Ireland next academic year, whether they will be eligible for reduced EU-citizen fees? The final date for submission of applications to third level institutions has already passed, yet many prospective students at Irish universities and colleges have had no indication from the Department of Education and Science as to what their status will be when the new academic year begins in September.

As they will be EU citizens from 1 May, does the Commission agree that the charging of non-EU fees to citizens of new Member States constitutes a clear act of discrimination? Has the Commission been in contact with the Irish Government on this issue? What has been its response? Has the Commission received similar complaints from other Member States on this issue? What action does it propose to take?

Answer given by Mrs Reding on behalf of the Commission

(23 April 2004)

(23 April 2004)

As far as conditions of access to education are concerned, the Member States are obliged to respect the principle of ‘equality of treatment’. According to this principle the university or college of a Member State where an EU citizen wishes to study must accept him/her under the same conditions as nationals.

Consequently, for the next academic year 2004/2005, Ireland and the other Member States must apply the principle of equality of treatment to nationals of the new Member States who will be entitled to pay home fees.

The Commission has not received any complaints regarding this issue and has, therefore, not contacted the Irish Government as yet.

The Commission departments will contact the Irish authorities in order to remind them of the rights of citizens of the new Member States regarding access to education.

---
Ha The dlrivW(\al CoucT O V F\fc&ea-W
FILED IN . v a . L COURTOFCRtMiNAWPEftfcS A^eAkja± RECEIVED IN COURTOFCRIMINAL APPEALS DEC 18,2015 •£ r=*r* " q r**+r tsr*3- U.W -LU A/_,„ Abel Acosta, Cisrk AbelAcosta, Clerk T)i<l gyU-fg. of Texas 

### jkp^ell.e_e_



### ^co^Se-J&es^oase. J_oJIiiE_/^0ft£fl/^Jusi^ JLom^_cu3u^E«itc_^ ___^^e_(WAiAj^^jittAjrW j:^ 

### jLfefiLjLi^ipeifcilLJ&d^ _AeaA\vA£«Jkc3VeJ^ 

### JlW\^qiu^aJ!&>^^ J j j v 

### \-o -Hae /atJ f/lmartj. ~

### As\ exXkiU'oao.1 4-krrly<J&.*jS fo *3fr»ift/g£c. -tbi. foro 3e >.t>.9- eesfe»is<a- in


## •f/mfe fb -file. ftfyeiUni's )sro gg. °?.bX neS^QnSe b(j -ffiirly <d^S, a&UnAVff -rlw. dtadUrfe-f<!> 3Q orH(5<3<iLUS 

## \[f\f\\ ^a^ ^iv.V H^ CcUr-t- ^rartV H/s Motion a*\A expend ^k^ Jlje^eAM^^kWfW. /3CQ FMfc>55 £osWc*ayjrxJ725S3_ L€rV>^c^^ oft 5grJice- 

### _bjfc*jg\^i_JPefMy4-LJ~ Pft \>e-g- iH,2P\5 <\ V^^ a*A £OrrefeJ- C^^_^^_^±t^_mtjkotl^hr_L_ 3LiikJrf^^JXWvi^c£»_&co.vl^_

£<±*Ad^J[kcr»^t\j^i9AhMfL 

## £~£L
\ 

\ 

Mr. J. z. MU.lll-

.REF ID:A415Bji5 

.,.,. 

Weat'8J'n Union Telegraph CClllpC\V 

60 Hwiaon Street IF · 

New !ork 13, };.., York 

Dear Mr. MiUvl 

Serl.ala · 2. i.. Ceo 7 

.1 4 APR 1954 

· A joint meeting ot au. three panlle organized \Ulder the 

flationll. . Seourit7 Apnq Sclfntific Advieot"T l30ard ia being 

plamed tor 20...a:l Mlq 1954. 

The firlt - will be devottd to acCClmpllehing ~strative detail.a and .f'amlliarising those pt.nel m-.ra not prev1ou~ 

·•cqu.aint-1 with the Agm.ey wl.th tb• b1ghlighta ot our Ol'gan11&tion . Ind etatt. Th• eecond da.Y' ie to be devoi.d to a detaUod presentation and diecuaaion ot eame ot our technlcal problena and to plAns 

tor future pam;l activitieae · ·· · 

You wUl not ·be ~ to &ttend the meeting on 20 --· but 

it 11 eincer9]1 hoped that you td.ll be able to be pteasent to:r the 

21 Mq meeting. U you will lAtt • know that 10U plan to attend, 

and th• modt ot travel you. pret.r, I vUl. have the neceeev:r travel, 

orders eent to you. . · 

Sillcere~, 

CCI AG 

c/s . «#~J.. S/ASST (Mr. Fri~dmanM~~-~~ 

. M/R:. Announces joint meeting of three panels of the NSASAB and invites 

panel member's attendance. 

L.E.Pierce/S/ASST/60493/8 Apr 54 

\ @'pproved for Release .by NSA on 12-01-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1825 

To require the Secretary of Energy to obtain the consent of affected State 

and local governments before making an expenditure from the Nuclear 

Waste Fund for a nuclear waste repository. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 22, 2015 

Mr. REID (for himself and Mr. HELLER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Energy to obtain the consent 

of affected State and local governments before making 

an expenditure from the Nuclear Waste Fund for a nuclear waste repository. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nuclear Waste In5 formed Consent Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act, the terms ‘‘affected Indian tribe’’, ‘‘af8 fected unit of local government’’, ‘‘Commission’’, ‘‘highVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:02 Jul 23, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1825.IS S1825

smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1825 IS

1 level radioactive waste’’, ‘‘repository’’, ‘‘spent nuclear 

2 fuel’’, and ‘‘unit of general local government’’ have the 

3 meanings given the terms in section 2 of the Nuclear 

4 Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10101). 

5 SEC. 3. CONSENT BASED APPROVAL. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may not make an 

7 expenditure from the Nuclear Waste Fund for the costs 

8 of the activities described in paragraphs (4) and (5) of 

9 section 302(d) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 

10 (42 U.S.C. 10222(d)) unless the Secretary has entered 

11 into an agreement to host a repository with— 

12 (1) the Governor of the State in which the re13 pository is proposed to be located; 

14 (2) each affected unit of local government; 

15 (3) any unit of general local government contig16 uous to the affected unit of local government if 

17 spent nuclear fuel or high-level radioactive waste will 

18 be transported through that unit of general local 

19 government for disposal at the repository; and 

20 (4) each affected Indian tribe. 

21 (b) CONDITIONS ON AGREEMENT.—Any agreement 

22 to host a repository under this Act— 

23 (1) shall be in writing and signed by all parties; 

24 (2) shall be binding on the parties; and 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1825 IS

1 (3) shall not be amended or revoked except by 

2 mutual agreement of the parties. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
- - DC.R~.S 

I 

J 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-16-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
2-

REF ID:A275246 

~ ~J),) .1D 2. --i.·DD3 

~c/C-v) 

I ~ ~ f!L~,,._j 

t- (.._, ~ ~ ~- S-~L( £,./1/Lt 

t-< ~A- r- k~bS - I ~ 

./<<)":TV_::_ ( ~~ t ~r 

t~ _\ p. ~'-Jl '1 ~ 

~ 'j- Y"-. .:.- (- t~- r c..- l.. ~"°"' 

~ 

I ~'<- ~μ/lf ~ 

M- 2. 2-g - f ~ vv-.~ ,, 

_,,, ~(• l CJ~ I 

~~ _\ ;-rt~~ 

~/~ ~ ~~ 'z,~ V\A.. (/\.A. tK. v~~ r ~ I 

~ I~~~: 

~~,. (_~c.--'l-vv._cv--.. ~ 

;- l._ .,_,.,_,~ 1:.- J.-.L-<- ;; I• "'f ~ . 
REF ID:A2752 
REF ID:A275246
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-K of Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. (“Caraco”) for the year ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their respective knowledge and belief, that:
  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Caraco.
 
  /s/  Jitendra N. DoshiJitendra N. DoshiChief Executive Officer/s/  Mukul RathiMukul RathiInterim Chief Financial Officer
 
 June 8, 2010