alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE 9 MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERNCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         114,881
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  756,489
<ALLOWANCES>                                    22,232
<INVENTORY>                                  2,654,760
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,084,412
<PP&E>                                       2,257,631
<DEPRECIATION>                                 966,719
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,614,134
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          869,031
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,690
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,216,552
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,614,134
<SALES>                                      3,772,149
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,772,149
<CGS>                                        1,297,111
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,297,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,866
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,746)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,246)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,246)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
REF ID:A275347 

0 g 9? 

To: - Mr. Win. F o Friedman, 

War :i:>epartment, 

WASHINGTONo 

Dear S:i..r, 

SBORE! 

On Colonel Tiltma..TJ.' s instructions I am sending you, 

under separate cover, the folloVT:tng -

~~l S.Io Course VoloI copies Nosoll6-135 ~~~~J So I. Course Vol.,II If If 116-135 

4) 7 

(5) 

(61 

~~ ".:C_ --- ~~ --

_(9 

S .. I. Course Solutions VoloI two copies 

S.I. Course Solutions VoloII II fl 

Supplementary Exercises to 

Section TV - Fo.12a. twenty It 

Supplementary Exercises Ho.98 It It 

It It No .. 99 II If 

Supplement to Solutions two " 

.11Iemo1rs of the Archaeological 

Survey of Ind.J.ao one It 

Yours faithfully, 

Lieuto I. Kayeo 

G.C. &.. C.S. 

/ 

~ / 

./ 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-15-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a i 

I 

i
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1658 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to protect employees in the 

building and construction industry who are participants in multiemployer 

plans, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2015 

Mrs. MCCASKILL (for herself, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. KIRK, and Mr. DURBIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to protect 

employees in the building and construction industry who 

are participants in multiemployer plans, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vested Employee Pen5 sion Benefit Protection Act’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1658 IS

1 SEC. 2. MINIMUM AGE FOR DISTRIBUTIONS DURING WORK2 ING RETIREMENT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (36) of section 401(a) 

4 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read 

5 as follows: 

6 ‘‘(36) DISTRIBUTIONS DURING WORKING RE7 TIREMENT.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—A trust forming part 

9 of a pension plan shall not be treated as failing 

10 to constitute a qualified trust under this section 

11 solely because the plan provides that a distribu12 tion may be made from such trust to an em13 ployee who has attained age 62 and who is not 

14 separated from employment at the time of such 

15 distribution. 

16 ‘‘(B) CERTAIN EMPLOYEES IN THE BUILD17 ING AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY.—Subpara18 graph (A) shall be applied by substituting ‘age 

19 55’ for ‘age 62’ in the case of a multiemployer 

20 plan described in section 4203(b)(1)(B)(i) of 

21 the Employee Retirement Income Security Act 

22 of 1974, with respect to individuals who were 

23 participants in such plan on or before April 30, 

24 2013, if— 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1658 IS

1 ‘‘(i) the trust to which subparagraph 

2 (A) applies was in existence before Janu3 ary 1, 1970, and 

4 ‘‘(ii) before December 31, 2011, at a 

5 time when the plan provided that distribu6 tions may be made to an employee who has 

7 attained age 55 and who is not separated 

8 from employment at the time of such dis9 tribution, the plan received at least 1 writ10 ten determination from the Internal Rev11 enue Service that the trust to which sub12 paragraph (A) applies constituted a quali13 fied trust under this section.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 this section shall apply to distributions made before, on, 

16 or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1927 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to postpone the effective date of 

high-impact rules pending judicial review. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 4, 2015 

Mr. COATS (for himself and Mr. LANKFORD) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to postpone the 

effective date of high-impact rules pending judicial review. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Require Evaluation 

5 before Implementing Executive Wishlists Act of 2015’’ or 

6 the ‘‘REVIEW Act of 2015’’. 

7 SEC. 2. RELIEF PENDING REVIEW. 

8 Section 705 of title 5, United States Code, is amend9 ed— 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1927 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘When’’ and inserting the fol2 lowing: 

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—When’’; and 

4 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(b) HIGH-IMPACT RULES.— 

6 ‘‘(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection— 

7 ‘‘(A) the term ‘Administrator’ means the 

8 Administrator of the Office of Information and 

9 Regulatory Affairs of the Office of Management 

10 and Budget; and 

11 ‘‘(B) the term ‘high-impact rule’ means 

12 any rule that the Administrator determines may 

13 impose an annual cost on the economy of not 

14 less than $1,000,000,000. 

15 ‘‘(2) RELIEF.— 

16 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in 

17 subparagraph (B), an agency shall postpone the 

18 effective date of a high-impact rule of the agen19 cy pending judicial review. 

20 ‘‘(B) FAILURE TO TIMELY SEEK JUDICIAL

21 REVIEW.—Notwithstanding section 553(d), if 

22 no person seeks judicial review of a high-impact 

23 rule during the 60-day period beginning on the 

24 date on which the high-impact rule is published 

25 in the Federal Register, the high-impact rule 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•S 1927 IS

1 shall take effect on the date that is 60 days 

2 after the date on which the high-impact rule is 

3 published.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - 50 CFR Part 622
          - [Docket No. 131211999-5045-02]
          - RIN 0648-BD86

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document contains a correction to the final rule to implement Amendment 20B to the Fishery Management Plan for the Coastal Migratory Pelagic Resources in the exclusive economic zone of the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Region (Amendment 20B) that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         January 27, 2015.                    

# DATES:

This correction is effective March 1, 2015.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Anik Clemens, 727-551-5611; email:                         *Anik.Clemens@noaa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Need for Correction

On January 27, 2015, (80 FR 4216), NMFS published an incorrect annual catch limit (ACL) value for Atlantic migratory group Spanish mackerel in § 622.388(d)(1)(iii). The commercial ACL for Atlantic migratory group Spanish mackerel is equal to the commercial quota. The commercial quota value was published correctly in § 622.384(c)(2), however, the commercial ACL value was published incorrectly in § 622.388(d)(1)(iii). This document corrects the commercial ACL value for Atlantic migratory group Spanish mackerel.

## Correction

1. On page 4223, in the first column, § 622.388(d)(1)(iii) is correctly revised to read as follows:

§ 622.388

* * * * *

(d) * * *

(1) * * *

(iii) The commercial ACL for the Atlantic migratory group Spanish mackerel is 3.33 million lb (1.51 million kg).

* * * * *

Dated: February 19, 2015.

Samuel D. Rauch III,

Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2015-03905 Filed 2-24-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-2320

_____________________________

MARCUS LANE HIRES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

James Scott Duncan, Judge.

August 9, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, WINOKUR, and LONG, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
St. Jude Medical, Inc. Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q







EXHIBIT 10.1


 



AMENDMENT 


TO THE


ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.


1994 STOCK OPTION PLAN


WHEREAS, St. Jude Medical, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (the “Company”), has heretofore adopted and maintains the “St. Jude Medical, Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan” (the “Plan”);


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has retained the power to amend the Plan; and


WHEREAS, the Board has authorized the amendment of the Plan to bring the Plan into compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). 


NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the power of amendment contained in Section 7 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of October 23, 2008, as follows:


1.  Section 1(i) of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:


i.          “Fair Market Value” means the value of the Stock on a given date as determined in accordance with Sections 422(c)(7) and 409A of the Code and any applicable Treasury Department regulations promulgated thereunder.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorized agent on this 23rd day of October, 2008.


 





	
 
 	
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.
 
	
 
 	
 
 	
 
 
	
 
 	
By
 	
/s/ Pamela S. Krop
Val. ter Ewiery 

.43S s. Curson .lve. 

Loa qeles 361 Cal.it. 

'J!be Chief' Sipll Officer;p 

War Dept.• Pm tagon Bldg., 

Vash1.ngton 2.S, n. C. 

atra 

REF ID:A67391 

c 0 p '! 

On Jmuar.r 1, 19.la, I ottered: 1111 services to Lt. r.o1. 

v.. r.. r:r.tedman (rat), Principal Cz7ptanal.J"•t.1 of the Code 

ml Cipher Seot1on as a volunteer translator ot U\7 J'n.uch 

err Spaninh t.-.tbooks or treatiseiJ on cr.1ptograpbr. I 

aplained 1iha. t q age precluded llD fl'OJD arq aoU. Ye •enlce bit. 

that I thought I llliCht be er Yalua on tl"anslatiJJ& tore1.&D 

books whieh mtgh t be Wiid in trahd.ng courees in the War 

Depar(.;n\. I was then living at 82.S J'i.t't.h An. 1 lf. I. C1tq. 

Kr. Fnedman replied on Ja. 9. l942i acce;>t.ihg rq otler:. 

ard asked me to at.art v1 th a took b;:r da V: ad.11• tatitl.ecl 

•!be .Art ot Enc1pbarlng am Deo.1phe:r1Dg Sec.l"et ll•asages •• 

La.tei-, l translated •Secret Ciphers Revealed,• by Com. 

Baser.les1 l9Q.l._, am no. la crwtogra.pb1e1 " b;r P. Valerio,. 1893• 

Var.t.oue letters bore 'Iha tile nlaberB SPS:CS•lt or SPSIS JU.S 

Gma:al.. The last one I haw seems to 'be that o£ 29 J\1171 19431 

f~a Headquarters• Seni.ces ot Suppl.J'. 

At no time was Kr. ll'Uldman certain that t.lase transl.at.tons a:tul.d be printed. I have J10t. heard !tom b1DL since 

JW.,- 29. 194). 

I would like to know it th8,1 ware printed. It not, 

ia there arq ob3eotion to ., us.in& the tramlatio:os tor UJ¥ 

pllllloae that. does not. \te in. lid. tb. 10ur departmeatt 1- haft 

IJO pl.am in the aatter aa! do not anUc.1.patc wd.qi the 

tl"analations 1n cq vq. Rovner,. I atill ba"Ye the 'W9l",Y 

~ cop7 of IQ' tranl.atlons and •• no purpose :ln keepinc; tm•• if thq C'e no use to aq om. 

Te.r.r ~ yours, 

I•! Walter !mer7 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-30-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

~ •-··-----
# CE2004088EN.01028601.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/286 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/286

---

(2004/C 88 E/0293)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1202/04

by Françoise Grossetête (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(14 April 2004)

Subject:   Definitions of waste and waste management and treatment methods

Subject:

Definitions of waste and waste management and treatment methods are interpreted differently by Member States and the persistence of these differences is an obstacle to satisfactory legal certainty and effective management of waste in Europe.

How and on the basis of what timetable does the European Commission envisage undertaking a radical reform of waste policy, and in particular simplifying the definition of waste and waste management and treatment methods?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(30 April 2004)

(30 April 2004)

The Commission is currently looking at waste policy in the context of the Thematic Strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste. The Strategy will be adopted in spring 2005.

In relation to the definition of waste, in the Communication towards the Thematic Strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste (1), the Commission flagged up the possibility of amending the definition of waste if there was a clear added value in doing this and a high level of protection of the environment was maintained. From the stakeholder consultation on the Communication, it would appear that there is little demand for such a fundamental revision, but that it may be useful to clarify some aspects of the definition of waste, and notably when waste ceases to be waste. The Commission is reflecting on how to handle this issue.

1

As for the different modes of waste treatment and management, these differences can reflect the different geographic, social and economic conditions that apply across the EU. It is important that a high and harmonised level of environmental protection is set for the different waste management operations, but the choice of waste treatment operation needs to retain flexibility to allow for local circumstances. The Communication towards the Thematic Strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste notes the absence of a level playing field for recycling facilities, and the Thematic Strategy will look at options for remedying this.

---

(1)  COM(2003) 301 final.

1

---
<PAGE>
 
                                EXHIBIT (10)(K)

Amendment to original lease of March 28, 1995, Canton, Massachusetts between 
       427 Turnpike Realty Trust and the Registrant dated April 1, 1998.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   April 1, 1998

                              427 TURNPIKE STREET
                              -------------------

                        INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONICS, INC.
                        -------------------------------

                                AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                ---------------

Reference is made to the Lease dated March 28, 1995 (the "Lease" by and between
427 Turnpike Street Realty Trust (hereinafter called the "Landlord", which
expression shall include its heirs, executors, successors and assigns where the
context so admits) of one part, and International Electronics, Inc., a
Massachusetts corporation (hereinafter called the "Tenant", which expression
shall include its successors and assigns or executors and administrators where
the context so admits) of the otherwise defined herein shall have the same
meaning herein as therein.

For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and legal sufficiency which is
hereby acknowledged, Lessor and Lessee hereby agree to amend the Lease as
follows:

1.  (A) SUBJECTS REFERRED TO;
        ---------------------

LEASE TERM
OR TERM:       From April 15, 1998 through April 14, 2000.

FIXED RENT:    Fixed Rent shall be payable as follows:  $5.92 per rentable 
               square foot, triple net, for all twenty-four (24) calendar 
               months of the Lease Amendment Term.  Fixed Rent shall be 
               calculated on the aggregate square footage of the Existing 
               Premises of 15,540 square feet.

2.  (B) LANDLORD'S REQUIRED WORK

               Should the Tenant request, Landlord's only work at the demised
               premises shall consist of the installation of carpet in the
               office space areas only.  Landlord shall initially pay for the
               cost of the carpet, both items not to exceed the cost of Ten
               Thousand dollars ($10,000.00), and the Tenant shall pay back the
               Landlord the total cost of the carpet and its installation in
               twelve (12) equal monthly installments commencing on May 1, 1998.


5. (C) The Factor:  The factor shall be 38.4%.
       ----------                             

All other terms and conditions remain the same.  Executed as a sealed instrument
this 2nd day of April, 1998.

  LANDLORD:    427 Turnpike Street Realty Trust
               --------------------------------

  BY:          /s/ Shawn Rand
               --------------
               Shawn Rand, Agent



  TENANT:      International Electronics, Inc.
               -------------------------------

  BY:          /s/ John Waldstein
               ------------------
               John Waldstein
               By its President
' • -~. # 

' ' 

Farm 781·C13S 

'fOf' BEffi:l!f 6AN6! - B~M 1i'Y IW 6\M\TION FSC53/ri;x/M(4) FINAL 

009 

UK-US COHFEH.OOE 00 'llE COIOOJNICATIDN3 Sh:CtRITY CF 

NATO COUNr RIES 

Minutes of the Fourth Meeti~ f£ the Conference 

he Jd a li ll.30, 11 June , 195 3 

U.K. Delega!bee 

lPL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Present 

Chairman: Mr. Willian( F. Friedman • 

Observers 

U.S. Delegates 

Mr ./William F .• •Friedman 

Mr. Victor P. Keay 

Mr. Frank B. Qowlett 

Mr. Robert F. Packard 

Mr. William.H. Godel 

Capt. Gif fo:rQ Grange, USN 

Col. M. L. 5herbum, USA 

Lt. Col •. J.ot\tl M. Anderson, USAF . Lt. K. 0

B. Monyperll', Jr., USN (5e~l'etary) 

Cdr. w. F. Thomaa 

Dr. H. J. Stuke7 

Dr. R. H. Shaw . 

Mr. F. c. Austin 

Mr. F. A. Raven 

1. The minutes o.t: the Plenacy session were considered and approved. 

2. The Chairman placed before the delegates a dra.tt or the Final 

Report or the Conference. This repo:M; was carefully' considered and the 

dratting group instructed to make va:rious revisions or additions. 

There were no serious disagreements concerning the report with the 

except.ion or the U.S. views regarding Appendix A • . t

3. Mr. Austin stated that the 0 .s. considered Appendix A to be 

ineffectual. He said that the invitation and waming contained in it 

would not elicit any resp0nse8. He pointed out that the misuse ot the 

Hagelin machine was one or the pr$.maey concems. He reconmended that 

Appendix A be used as written but that paragraph 6 be expanded to 

include the detail which the u.s~ believed to be necessary conceming 

the Hagelin equipnent. ll !!!! agreed. \ . . . I 

1+. The Chairman suggested that the original dratting group meet 

directly after a recess at 11+30 and prepare for the committee as a 

whole, the substance of the problem, additional conclusions and 

recommendations to be included in the final report. The Chairman 

further suggested that a drafting group be appointed to expand paragraph 6 ot the Appendix I\ as previously agreed. Both or the above 

suggestions were accepteJ.. The following were designated to drai"t 

Appendix A: 

f Mr. Raven 

Dr. Shaw 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-08-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

TOP SECRET CANOE 
, . .. . .. 

l"SC53/EX/M(4) _WU\L 

009 

5. The Chai:nnan suggeslieu and il ~ agreed that the two drarting 

groups should deliver to the Secretariat by 1800 a completed draft 

which would then be considered by the corm1dttue as a whole at 1400 on 

12 June 1 prior to the closing ~lenary Session, lient.ativelJr echedu1ed. for 

1500. 

6. There being no f'urther business the meeting adjoumed at 1,300. 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

/a/ K. B. Monypeny1 Jr. 

K. B. Monypeny, Jr • 

• 

2 

f-78J.C13S TOP SECRET CANOE