alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.

REGINALD MCDANIEL LAVENDER , Petitioner

.

No. 1 CA

- CR 18

- 0879 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR 2015

- 116974

- 001 The Honorable John Christian Rea , Judge
REVIEW GRANTED; RELI EF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney’s Office , Phoenix By Daniel Strange Counsel for Respondent Reginald McDaniel Lavender , Florence Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Jennifer B. Campbell delivered the decision of the Court, in which Judge Maria Elena Cruz and Judge James B. Morse Jr. joined. FILED 7-16-2019STATE v. LAVENDER Decision of the Court

2 C A M P B E L L , Judge:
¶1 Petitioner Reginald McDaniel Lavender seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner’s first petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 588/2006

of 12 April 2006         

fixing the maximum export refund for butter in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 581/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 581/2004, for the tendering period ending on 11 April 2006, the maximum amount of refund for the products referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation shall be as shown in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 13 April 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 April 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

(2)OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 64. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 409/2006 (OJ L 71, 10.3.2006, p. 5).

(3)OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 58. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1814/2005 (OJ L 292, 8.11.2005, p. 3).

----

ANNEX

----
eset

_ MIDOUAMTERS UNITED STATES A once
s OFFICE OF THE VICE CHIEF OF STAFF
REFERRAL SLiP

TO:
JAFCSS] | AFCOA AFPDC AFODC. AEXDC AFMDC FDDC |
AFCAS] TSaFis AFPMP AFOOP AFXSC afwee | laroro

AFCI SAI AgPTR APOMO AFXWH arm | laroos
JAFCIN, TAFAAC AFP AFOCE AFL anes | arpor
L_Jarcual Jara ‘AFPDP aroac | [arxpp | faruss |FOAP.

AFCRF! |AFASC LAFPe@s | “[aroar | AFXPR AFMTP JAFDRO
|AFCS Gi /AFAMA, AFPDW AFORQ AF XAC APMLE |AFOFO
AFCSA JAFAAF AFPCH AFOwX AFUME |AFDAT
AF Com) AFAUD ed
Arrerriype

FoR/”
APPROPRIATE ACTION -

DIRECT REPLY

COMMENT AND/oR RECOUMENDATION

COORDINATION :
CCS, CVE AND CAV HAVE7HAS NOT SEEN

PREPARATION OF REPLY To SAF

PREPARATION OF REPLY FOR SIGNATURE OF SAF
PREPARATION OF REPLY FOR SIGNATURE AFCCS

PREPARATION OF REPLY FOR S$QHATURE AFcvC
PREPARATION OF REPLY FOR SIGNATURE _AFCAV

PREPARATION OF Ri R31 RE
COPY OF REPLY FOR

NOTE AND RETURN

INFORMATION AND/OR FILE
INFORMATION COPIES HAVE GONE To
ACTION HAS GONE YO :

SUSPENSE DATE

“isin te Be al 9g 9

OF TIS roms ane opscueTe = ay 077 408



—SEGRET.

a, |

Program Requirements (50) Woe 5.9 ee \ |
Tnchuied in Financial Plan UW6.0 15 ~

me ... -
Progrent Requizements Bo R.2 ~S

in fen 38.0 6.9 SSSI

1

Proezem Boguizepente: ;
SANDS (RED) - 10.8 ADWDy
_ Inchwied in Financial Pian 23.5 ~



wrecia, “east FoR

ADMINISTRATIVE“
ASSISTANT

core, couse

JOFrice oF a
LEGISLATIVE Liatson

‘orrice or

IWPOMMATION BeRVices >

Soonb ination «.

NOTE iD ROWAN.

THE UNO StcRETARy

” Iw DinegaTeN ony: rT B 5 al
L A ‘SECRETARY

Si: [ HE ASSISTANT StCAETARY

AFHQ am vs 0-96

©. 5. SOvenneNT remmms once: tes o-s70386



DEPARTMENT OF . . AIR FORCE AIR STAFF SUMMARY Si. I

ROUTE To: ‘ACTION JOMATURE (Orade and Sernase) ORIGINATOR (Symbol ‘TELEPHONE NO. DATE
}2 {AROS [Approval 47 é AFDAT | nm 6 Oct 59 -
2) AFAR | es .
3 | Arcos | aa
7 ACT i
Orr icen fl
(Signature) TYPIST *s
mrTias
Major D. 3. Floyd sas
(Typed Grede and Surname)
‘SUBJECT :
SAMOS end MIDAS Development Prograns : ee
suaary ~ a

2. fon eeemtamber 1959, Generel Schriever addressed two letters to the Chief of
Bratt on the problems of the SAMOS end MIDAS development progress. Specific com-
ments he made in these letters vere as follows:

a. Derexral of the recovery capsule development program in the SANDS program. |

b. pe panne Of official notification as to Air Force funding support for
either the R&D or operational progrems of SANDS.

c. camden ence of @ clear decision from this Headquarters to employ the 65-2
Taunch Complex st Vendénberg in support of the SAMOS progres, .

a. ‘The general. problems associated vith construction ant use of the PR-
Point Arguello Complex.

e. Linasity for a positive decision fron Dr. York to proceed with MIDAS as
Shtleerehscen, system in order to develop this system in accordance with the
philosophies of concurrency.

2. The Sttached reply to General Schriever represents the best ahsvers on these
Questions as of this tine.

AFHQ sin'ty SO Patvious corrions of Tas FORM WAY Be ~SECRET == 4g




Saas. ae
.:;~~~~ ·";' . 

~-

·.;.:. 

.,. 

·. ;~· 

. :·.··:--' . ;· ... : 

. ,_'.. ·._·;~)~i-t.-"· . ..... < 

REF .~: :·. 

,. . ~· . . ·'-; ;. 

I,.•.,·· 

c: t:' ..... ., D'"' ..:... AHS :IR 12 AGI r.m 321~!)l ·: ... 

A n.r 3 ~-7~ 09 

VIP~ TT'!. • '"'I 01144!2'2,. 'T II,., ..:.:.. . .. J. l""' 

F!1 o~;: NSA 7.61 ~·.FOR :·!SA 72A ' DR. L.t. SHil~i·t .. TO • • iJSA 00T ;-m,. FR i ED;·~A:~ 

• 3T -· 

I!" ... e R c ~ ...:. .... T 

I -

1. 

RECUESTED IHFO mi CREECJ;: ~:.n~ TU~KEY !-!Einio:JED Y~U~ :PARA_ D.'' 

HOUL"D. YOU PASiS:·· TffIS TO HiM DIRECTLY -AT STATE DEPT?·' ·· ... ~ . .. , . ;. . - '!'. 

,' · ..· 

... 

2. J •.. ; ·. . . ' . ' i . .. • .•. .·; .. · 

comIITTEE YESTERDAY APPROVE!> DRAF.! OF .PP-IMARY· RE?ORT •. T.~:o. . - .· .· . . . ·. ·.:· . ·. . 

SECOi!DA~Y REPORTS l10i! B;!:ING. ·DRAFTED 

3T 

?.!\TIA?HRASE · ~mT R:EOUIRED.~ ~onSUL r-·cRYPTOCE~ITER 

S E G Fl _::;: T' ' \ 

TOT: 01/~510Z:- · iGC 

Ton: 01~1,l1Z APR .~3 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-26-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

"• ·•' • I • 

. ·;. '. 

, I 

' .. 

''
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our report, incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-41360, No. 33-
57609, No. 33-57607, No. 33-45564, and No. 333-27783) and on Form S-3 (No. 33-
54747 and No. 33-65293).

/s/  ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
December 17, 1998

                                      57
# CE2004084EN.01035402.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/354 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/354

---

(2004/C 84 E/0412)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0291/04

by Raffaele Costa (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(6 February 2004)

Subject:   Road accidents in European Union countries

Subject:

On 12 January 2004 the French Prime Minister announced that there were 5 732 road deaths in France in 2003, compared with 7 242 in 2002, 8 437 in 1998, 10 289 in 1990 and 12 428 in 1981 and that in Italy too, partly because of the penalty-points licence, the number of victims fell in 2003. Can the Commission say whether it already has, or intends to obtain road death figures for all European Union countries? On what factors do any anomalies depend? Has there been a reduction in the number of victims everywhere? What public or private measures or initiatives have led to the reduction?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(11 March 2004)

(11 March 2004)

Pursuant to Council Decision of 30 November 1993 (1), the Commission receives information on road accidents and has since July 2002 published detailed statistics on the Europa website (2).

1

2

There is a great disparity between the Member States: those with the best results (the Netherlands, Sweden, the United Kingdom) record around 60 to 65 deaths per million inhabitants per year, in contrast to 160 to 180 deaths in the countries with the poorest results (Greece and Portugal). The average for the European Union (EU15) is around 105 deaths per million inhabitants per year.

Concerning the factors explaining these differences, the Commission would refer the Honourable Member to the recent European Action Programme for Road Safety, adopted by the Commission in 2003 (3). Generally speaking, the greatest scope for improvement lies in road-user behaviour, though the road infrastructure could also be greatly improved in several Member States.

3

Substantial improvements have been recorded in France (a 22 % reduction in the number of deaths in 2003 compared with 2002), Ireland (– 10 %), Italy (– 17 % (4)) and Portugal (– 11 % (5)). The reductions are mainly due to improved road-user behaviour, whether because of increased awareness or better enforcement of the rules (more controls, tougher penalties imposed more effectively). According to provisional, indicative figures, the number of deaths in EU15 in 2003 should be under 35 500 in contrast to 38 500 en 2002 and almost 40 000 in 2001.

4

5

---

(1)  Council Decision of 30 November 1993 on the creation of a Community database on road accidents, OJ L 329, 30.12.1993.

1

(2)  http://europa.eu.int/comm/transport/road/roadsafety/index_en.htm, heading road safety/CARE

2

(3)  ‘Halving the number of road accident victims in the European Union by 2010: A shared responsibility’, Commission communication, COM(2003)311 final.

3

(4)  January-September 2003/January-September 2002.

4

(5)  January-August 2003/January-August 2002.

5

---
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice
 On February 26, 2015, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed consent decree with the United States District Court for the District of Nevada in the lawsuit entitled 
                    *United States and State of Nevada*
                     v.
                    *Newmont USA Limited,*
                     Civil Action No. 3:15-cv-00199-HDM-WGC. In this action, the United States and the State of Nevada filed a complaint under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act,, 42 U.S.C. 6901 
                    *et seq.,*
                     and the State of Nevada's Disposal of Hazardous Waste statutes, set forth at Title 40 (“Public Health and Safety”), Chapter 459 (“Hazardous Materials”) of the Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS 459.400 to 459.600) alleging violations at a gold mining and processing facility located near Carlin, Nevada. The consent decree requires Newmont to pay a civil penalty of $395,000.00. The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to 
                    *United States*
                     v.
                    *Newmont USA Limited,*
                     D.J. Ref. No. 90-7-1-10580. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail: *To submit comments:*
*Send them to:*By email
*pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov.*By mail
Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, D.C. 20044-7611.
 During the public comment period, the consent decree may be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department Web site: 
                    *http://www.usdoj.gov/​enrd/​Consent_​Decrees.html.*
                     We will provide a paper 
                    ( print page 11690)
                    copy of the consent decree upon written request and payment of reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611. Please enclose a check or money order for $6.25 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury. Henry Friedman, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.


[FR Doc. 2015-04417 Filed 3-3-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
.., .., • STANDARD FORM NO. 64 9 REF ID = A65a1 • 

{)fli,~ 

~ 

Memorandum • uN1TEn sTATEs GOVERNMENT 

CONFIDENTIAL 

lni-16 

Jl$J.-OOC TO mu 1 

DATE. If ,., 19'1 

FROM ae....oor 

SUBJECT: !NU.e of •ConteNDCe ladpa• to mmbera of t,ba 1pooia1, (Jqptol.oaio .................. -...... "' ... "" .................. -. -..... ~ .... -. •.- ................ ... • 

4. Cont'd. 

.&PSA-16 f\\nd.IJh eaob ot die puotioipente >J..w ta poapa~ 1 with a JftlPll'LT ,... or other appt"Opri&te -"• 11hiob w1ll permit b1a t.o do thU tar ta worJWw 

-· 4 J\ll'J8 t.o ' hM. 

'' 1\ b repeted. that tbe =ant Jllll'OPll'Lj JIU•• lie ml1ebh llDt later than OI!)) hourll on 4 J'lam. ~ 0. tuo1 WAC will. piok \him 11P and. 

•• tht.t tbq an deliftnd t.o 118A c:°:nna1 4981.pated. to wt. tbe ICMJ __.. &t. the Gate Hou.aft, ,.., W01'9t 1oDO •• 4 J'mlB! 

6, '1htt 111¥1....s.pect will be ruponaihle tor the return ot \he...,.. Une4 

to acJO memben at t.h• aamluion of the Cont ..... 

. :' 

• et)NFIBENTIA-L .,... ~ - • .. r ., _;, • .. &. + - ""'•" ~t' • ... • 

. ,
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1895 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1895

To amend the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act for purposes of making 
claims under such Act based on exposure to atmospheric nuclear testing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 29, 2015

  Mr. McCain introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act for purposes of making 
claims under such Act based on exposure to atmospheric nuclear testing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Downwinders Compensation Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION UNDER THE RADIATION EXPOSURE COMPENSATION ACT.

    Section 4(b)(1) of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 
U.S.C. 2210 note; Public Law 101-426) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B)--
                    (A) by striking ``that portion of''; and
                    (B) by striking ``that consists of townships 13 
                through 16 at ranges 63 through 71''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by inserting ``all acreage in any 
        county all or part of which is located in'' before ``that 
        part''.
                                 <all>
```
•. -/!"'/ 

TOf SE16Rhte EO 3.3(h)(2) AFSA•OOB/aas (c-JW.12~ ~p!.L~ 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 14 Dooomber 1950 /~ l~~~r 

..!I.. 

SUDJLCT; 

.mR.U%U'..! FOR 

Proposed 

DIRAFSA 

Global btructure tor u.s. ;.!ilitaey OO:tilJT 

v ... ~ 

Activities. 

Enclosure; (A) Global Plan for Oo?Itrol. Coordination and Support 

of\ u.s. 00 iirlT Aotivities. 

1. In preparation for the forthcoming discussions rela.tive to 

drawil:Jg up plans for ~ lclobal CO'!IMT structure. it is 

eaeential that a u.s. globll structure first be decided upon. Aa 

a basis for development of the lattor. there is submitted herewith. 

aa enoloaure (A)• a proposed global plan for control. coordination 

and support of u.s. military OOrlillr activities (i.e. those under 

jurisdiction of the Department of Defense.) 

2. The enclosure is intended to shaw the normal control and 

support relationships among AFSA. the bervice cryptologic agenoioa. 

the several unified oormia.ms. and suoh individual service commands 

as might exist. The enclosure has been designed to brins out the 

parallelism between the several echelons of the CO!IMT structure and 

those of the unified and S ervioe operating command structures which 

are to be served by the C01Ul1T aotivit:leao ~ihere the military departments are shown. these of course• include the intelligence 

compononts thereo.f o 

z. The proposed plan coni'orms to the recoillllended principles 

to~ div~aion of responsibilities between AFSA and the ~ervice crypto• 

loGic agenoies. as set !'orth iu AFSAC 60/26. 

Copies furnished& 

AFSA•l2 (1) 

AFSA-02 (l) C 

AFSA-OOT (1 ),{t& 

AFSA•l4 (1) 

TOP SECRET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-05-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
• 

• 

...... I • , ....... " JI D 

g v .... SECRET 

FOREIGN 

COLLABORATION 

A'.FSA COMD ~ BtJ'Pl!ORT 

\ , 

[ 

DIRml.'OR 

AFSA 

1 

AFSAC 

JCS 

!.J' 

'\ , 

Gl.O:BAL PLAN FOR COI~~\fJL_ COORDmATION Arm SUPPCM' OF 

I 

I 

------ --- -----------, 

" JOINT STAFB ---'!II, & 

c--- . 

I 

' ' ' I 

I 

• SERVICE COMttl'r.I' SUPPORT 

..:,, ' 

INDIVIDUAL 

CHIEFS OF STAFF 

I 

U .so COMIN'r ACTIVITD!S 

Operational Direction 

Coordination 

COMmT Requirements 

ana Response 

Teohnioal Support 

Logietlo Support 

(As Appropt"iats) 

:-- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - --- -- - -r 

... ~, 

DEPARTMEN'l'AL 

L1WEL 

THEATRE 

LEVEL 

TACTICAL 

LEVEL 

I 

1-..,... I 

I 

I 

,_ + 

~1 " 

AFSA , BEADQU.ABTEBS "' 

'1' 

, I' ,~ 

AFSA 1 ...... - TBEATBE ...... , 

CENTEBS * / 

' 

'FIELD (IN!l'.EBCEPr) 

ACTIVITDB UNDER iie,~-------J A'FSA DIRECTION ' 

* In Z .. l • .A'FSA Hdqtrs J.e Thealire Center 

'I 

EXECUTIVE 

(MILITARY) 

DEPARTMENTS 

I' 

~v \,I 

UNIFIED 

COMMAM>ERS 

I\ 

\,I ~, 

SUBORDINATE 

SERVICE 

COMMANDERS 

TOP SECRET 

VI ~I 

SERVICE 

C:RYFTOLOGIC 

BEADQ'UARTEBS l'i;<~-----..... 

SERVICE l!ii~~----___;·~ 

FIELD (MOBILE) : ,. COMINT ~ ...... :__ ______ , 

ACTIVITIES 

\ . 

MILITARY 

DEPARTMEN'l'S 

'l' I\ 

y )t . SERVICE I 

COMMANDERS NOT 

tnmEB UNIFIED 

COMMAND 

14 Dao 1950
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01
                                                                   -------------


                          Consent of Ernst & Young LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-71462; Form S-8 No. 333-05253; and Form S-8 No. 333-15191)
pertaining to Occupational Health + Rehabilitation Inc of our report dated March
11, 1997, with respect to the financial statements of Occupational Health +
Rehabilitation Inc included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1996.

                                               /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 26, 1997
REF ID:A67207 

Serials I'/ 3 3 

ld.&adier Ooneral !om c. !1.YU, USAP• let. 

lSl. Chathaa Boa4 

a,racu.M, lw York 

1>9ar 0eraJ'4 Rf.Yea& 

/""/- APRii- l 1 !:.-.3 

a..i.p\ cd 70-ar letter or 6 April 19Sl. 14th its 1nclo-·n1re3• 

is ~qed. 

w. .S.U nov be able to ao a.bead qu.ick:17 tdth the elearance 

pncedlU'GS amt antioJ.pate no cW't1oult1f in obt.d.ntnit the •peoial 1'799 cleannce reqlAlrld tor acceu io o~ wrlc:. 

Pl•s• acoef)t. rq uaurance ot ov apprad.atton ot \he canld.derable trouble 1D which we baYe put. JOv. 1D ·~ tbe data 

nquirld 1n DD FCll"ll )98 mJ t.lla IU.ppl.-.nt thereto., I lmov tat 

this 1• al.vq• • D.lnten, no • t-ter llotl a1.1111>le 1t ..,. appe1ar atw ~ data ban been •t. down. 

I • Mlll!ins Dr. a.ar the !bft!S .naq1d.nid tor en gp-t.o-date r.noml Itlsto17 Statamt.. lot.baa w laY• 1raserted data tft>a 

u old Pm and &11 he vill haTe to dot• brl.D& t.be data up to 

date. PJ.n&erpr1n\ fol"lla an alev Wna HD\ htm. 

CCI AG 

C/.S 

S/AS'frr 

R/D - Dr. Letbl.er, BSA-34 

llMera\7, 

'· •• WEllJD. IMr Admll"&l., us •av 

Vice m"°t.or 

M/Rt Oen. Rives tonrarded completed PBS le P/P'• ld.tb his ltr 

ot 6 Apr. He is a prospectJ.Ye Ad. B4 member. 

w. r. lrledmm/S/Asat/fi.l}/)3/9 Apr 53-eby 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-20-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352fl___~-------.......... ---