alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

 

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of theundersigned officers of Supreme Industries, Inc. (the “Company”), does herebycertify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 2007 (the “Form10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 
| DATE:  November 13, 2007 |   | /s/  Herbert M. Gardner  |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |   | Herbert  M. Gardner      |   |
|                     |   | Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Qpursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as partof the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of theCompany, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing.

 

 

----
# CE2004084EN.01082201.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/822 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/822

---

(2004/C 84 E/0916)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0618/04

by Anna Karamanou (PSE) to the Commission

(1 March 2004)

Subject:   Decision by the Dutch parliament to expel thousands of immigrants

Subject:

On 17 February 2004 the Dutch parliament adopted a government bill to expel some 26 000 immigrants and refugees who have been living in the country for years, including many young people born in the Netherlands. The bill also provides for new, more stringent conditions for granting asylum to immigrants, in line with the tough immigration policy pursued by the Dutch Government over the last few years. The majority of Dutch society, together with scores of non-governmental organisations, have declared their opposition to this inhumane and racist decision. The UN High Commission for Refugees has also expressed its opposition to the plan, since many immigrants in the Netherlands face serious problems, and there is no prospect of repatriating them safely to their countries of origin.

Will the Commission say whether it considers that the specific measures to expel immigrants from the Netherlands by force are compatible with the 1951 Geneva Convention and the Tampere commitments to draw up an integrated European asylum and immigration policy with transparent rules based on European humanitarian values and respect for the dignity of the human person?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(13 April 2004)

(13 April 2004)

The Commission was not sent the Government Bill adopted by the Dutch Parliament on 17 February 2004.

As far as the Commission is aware, the national measures at stake concern only rejected asylum seekers. The Dutch Aliens law provides for a general possibility of review by Courts of negative decisions. Courts are competent to decide, on a case by case basis, whether the removals would be in accordance with obligations under international law, in particular under the 1951 Geneva Convention on the status of refugees and Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The Commission would like to underline that, in general, the possibility of return of rejected asylum seekers could be the logical consequence where the outcome of an asylum procedure is negative for the applicant, when the procedure was fair and allowed for all needs for international protection to be examined. A final negative decision implies that the person at stake was not found to be in need of international protection. If there are no other grounds for legal stay, return can be implemented.

---
REF ID:A43994 

~~iAI~OWEH 

COPY 

ASSIST.AIU SECRETA.HY OF DEFENSE 

WASEINGTOH 25, D. C. 

MEMOIW;nm.~ FOR THE SECRETARY OF 'E:!E ARMY 

TIIE SECHETARY OF THE IiA VY 

TP.E SECRETARY OF T!IE AIR FORCE 

DIRECTOR, UATIOHAL SECURITY AGENCY 

j:.JAR 23 1961 

AD~IINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TO THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 

SUBJECT: Proposed DOD Directive 

Attached is a draft of a proposed Directive to be :issued by 

the Sec:17etary o:f' Defense whici.1 will establish authorities for the 

approval of certain personnel actions affecting key personnel in 

the Department. 

Please let me have your concurrence or comments on this 

draft not later than 29 March 1961. 

Attachru.ent 

/s/ Carlisle P. Runge /t I CARLISLE p. RUI'lGE 

.COPY 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 10-10-2013 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
REF ID:A43994 

. .,,. ... • 

I. ~~-~~~~-

To establish authorities for certain personnel actions affecting 

key personnel in the Department of Defense. 

II. Definition 

As used herein "key personnel" means, with respect to Schedule C 

positions, incumbents and proposed appointees of positions above 

tne GS-11 level; and with respect to positions other than Schedule c, 

incumbents and proposed appointees of GS-16, GS-17, GS-18, and Public 

Law 313 positions. 

III. Authorities 

A. I·To appointment, promotion, or removal of Schedule C key personnel 

shall be made except with the prior approval of the Secretary of 

Defense or the Deputy Secretary of Defense. 

B. No appointment, promotion, or removal of key personnel other 

than Schedule C shall be made except with the prior approval: 

1. In a military department, of the Secretary or the 

Under Secretary; 

2. In the National Security Agency, of" the Director or the 

Deputy Director; and, 

3. In any other component of the Department of Defense, of 

the Secretary of Defense or the Deputy Secretary of Defense. 

IV. _Imp~emep.ta t~ 

Insofar as they are inconsistent, all existing reaula.tions delegating 

authority for personnel actions will be revised to conform with this 

Directive.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 41 (Tuesday, March 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 11432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04373]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR15-18-000]


Sunoco Pipeline L.P.; Notice of Petition for Declaratory Order

    Take notice that on February 23, 2015, pursuant to Rule 207(a)(2) 
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.207(a)(2) (2014), Sunoco Pipeline 
L.P. filed a petition for a declaratory order approving the proposed 
tariff rate structure, proration policy, and various aspects of the 
Transportation Service Agreement for the Delaware Basin Extension 
project, as more fully explained in the petition.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Petitioner.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1d5b584f5e5273717473784e686d6d726f695d7b786f7e337a726b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b4f2f1e6f7fbdad8dddad1e7c1c4c4dbc6c0f4d2d1c6d79ad3dbc2">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on March 23, 2015.

    Dated: February 25, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-04373 Filed 3-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code
  (i)
    
    The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: February 14, 2006
    
    /s/ SETH L. VAN VOORHEESSeth L. Van VoorheesChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MAY 31,1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,216
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,941
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,414
<INVENTORY>                                     31,332
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,668
<PP&E>                                          22,017
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 103,341
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,288
<BONDS>                                         46,204
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            77
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,772
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   103,341
<SALES>                                        120,977
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               120,977
<CGS>                                           82,518
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,518
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,862
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,550
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,896
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,711
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,185
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,185
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .80
        

</TABLE>
AAM-12-442-E July 30, 2012

Exemption No. 10591 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0668

Mr. Michael Bisek Helicopter Experts, Inc.

29640 Bulverde Lane Bulverde, TX 78163

Dear Mr. Bisek:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated June 8, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Helicopter Experts, Inc. (HelicopterExperts) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow Helicopter Experts to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Helicopter Experts.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two drug and alcohol testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Helicopter Experts, Inc. an exemption from 14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Helicopter Experts to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program, subject to the conditions and

limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Helicopter Experts are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same auspices of the Helicopter Experts part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on July 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.4

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the use in the prospectus constituting part of this
Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Engage Technologies, Inc. of our report
dated March 1, 1999 relating to the financial statements of Internet Profiles
Corporation, a California corporation, which appears in such prospectus. We
also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such
prospectus.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California

July 16, 1999
TO: COBS 

REF ID:A72682 

SUBJECT: Report of' Office of Operations Participants 

in SCAMP 

FROM: OPRS DATE: 17 Sept 1952 COMMEIT BO. 2 

A. Sinltov/333 

1. The report on SCAMP submitted by the 02 participants is submitted for your 

information. 

2. There is a feeling in 02 that AFSA-3lt. is tending toward an excessive amount 

of emphasis on pure research at the expense of the kind of applied research which 

voul.d be more directly of advantage to the COMIIT effort. 

2 

~ J. R. DENRIS 

Captain, u.s. llavy 

Acting Chief 

Office of' Operations 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 02-11-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
F ID:A72682 

SECURITY ION (If an11) 

DISPOSITION FORM 

FILE NO I SUBJECT Report of Off ice of 

in SCAMP 

Operations Participants 

TOAFSA-02 

VIA: AFSA-206 

AFSA-02T {~ FROM • J. Levenson 

D. M. Drib:i.n 

B. c. Getchell 

DATE COMMENT NO 1 

At the invitation of the organizing group, Office' of Operations sent three teams 

of two memers to SCAMP, each for a period of appronmately 25 days. The purpose 

of the Office• s participation was to act as observers and general guide to the 

mathematical research of the conference. It was felt that the presence of these membe~s would serve to keep the topics discussed related to operational problems. 

The ' teams consisted of the follOWJllg individuals: 

l. Dr. DI'l.bin l Dr. Frazer 2. Mr. Levenson 

Mr. Smith 

J. Dr. Getchell 

Mr. Bostick 

Upon arrival at U. c. L. A. it was found that several members were not cleared. 

In fact, the conposition of the gr-oup was largely determined by the failure to 

clear many of the original selections for the group. This resulted in lJ..rn.J..b.ng 

severely the scope of the problems that could,be discussed. This tended to 

divert the discussions from operational problems, an:i almost the entire tl.Dle was 

devoted to the existence and construction of finite proJective planes of various 

orders. This problem, although of some mathematical interest, did not warrant 

the effort in view of the lack of cryptologic application. 

For the future we feel the problems to be discussed be coordinated with the Office 

of Operations and that the participants should be selected on the basis of 

having done work related to these problems. This presupposes adequate clearance 

prior to the begimu.ng of the program. 

In conclusion, we feel that the two months of SCAMP•s existence failed to produce 

any res)llts of value to the Office of Operations. It is recommended, therefore, 

that unless future progra.m'3 be more clearly related to operational problems, the 

Office of Operations should not participate in such conferences. 

Ar~l~~ I 

~~~ 

;:JfJ;!;1ztv 

B. C. Getchell 

DD I ~t~M!iO 9 6 REPLACES NME FORM 96 I OCT 48 WHICH MAY BE USED J.&-M801-8 "'f.r U I 80VERNMl'NT ~WINTING OFFICE
~--42~·~?--~,_ __ u!_~~---~:·~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~---< 

~ -d ~~------------------

~---'Pj-X~ _____ J __ x~~-1 _.;;t~t iY~ 

;:z.. .2 

3. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-11-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
Exhibit
10.1


 


September 19, 2008


 


Howard H. Pien


c/o Medarex, Inc.


707 State Road


Princeton, NJ 08540


 


Dear Howard:


 


Last year, in connection
with your acceptance of the job of President and Chief Executive Officer of
Medarex, Inc. (the “Company”), you
were awarded, in addition to stock options, 300,000 shares of restricted stock
under the Company’s 2005
Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Plan”),
including 75,000 shares of Company common stock vesting on June 14, 2012,
with the possibility of accelerated vesting beginning in 2010 under certain
conditions (the “Performance Stock Grant”).


 


It
has recently come to our attention that Section 4 of the Plan states that,
in any fiscal year, a maximum of 200,000 shares of Restricted Stock (as defined
in the Plan), plus an additional 50,000 shares of Restricted Stock in
connection with commencement of employment, may be granted to any Plan
participant.


 


Therefore,
to enable the Company to comply with the Plan, we hereby request your consent
to the rescission of the grant of 50,000 shares of Restricted Stock that were
awarded to you in 2007 as part of the Performance Stock Grant.  If such rescission occurs, you would continue
to own, subject to the restrictions set forth in the original grant, the
remaining 25,000 shares originally awarded to you as part of the Performance
Stock Grant.


 


Please
acknowledge your consent to such rescission by executing below.


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  Sincerely,

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  MEDAREX,
  INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   /s/Christian S. Schade

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   Christian S. Schade

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   Chief Financial Officer

  



 


Agreed
and Acknowledged


this
30th day of September, 2008


 


 


	
  /s/
  Howard H. Pien

  	
   

  
	
  Howard
  H. Pien
' . 

. ....,,~- .... ... ... _. ..... -

• 

1 

-

~i:rmingham~ Micho Doco 23~ 19530 

. EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

JJOB.T Bill~ ~-.-· 

Jlirst ©f all I 'l:l'ant to thanh you"',,afid ~1.izab<ath f'or nll youx- h<:»GJpi= 

tnlity durine my stmy.~n tlaa~r{"'gtono I certainly Gnjoyed ii wery 

l!inlch; o.nd. ffiY ~o.lka wi ~h y~wt7oro most valu,nblo for mo v as they on~bl0d raG t@ f'inQ\. a fSJlrl'da.'iion fol" my fut;ura WOI"ko 

_/ . 

wm:ds iny tX'aTiolline hb.duJ.o: t1o = AnniG and I = stay- \_horG until '\#h0 

· 28ihp t1hen t1Q go isiting rolativ0sp on our way to New York~ ~hero 

we arrive on t . 2nd of Jan in the ov@nin{So Wo will stay at tha 

NGt1 \Yoston tGlo Mail will ©thGrwi&:10 alway!iil reach IilQ a/o JiSriceeoia ~010,hong ale9 Corp, 100 Pa?k ~VGnue~ NoYoCc 

tlo pla to ~o to ~ashington ~omGtim~ on the 8th, and return to NY 

cm t 12tho 

And lastly~ I hav0 a few poi~tG 

youo 

which I would like to transmit t@/ 

~" ~a ar0 all well 1/i@re, and hone that you(wI11 a so 

in the b~st of health and in fine spiritso -

We se~ou our best wishes for a happy new year, and hope to me~t 

you soon ~gaino Affectionat~lv ' ... 

NSA on 08-21-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352 

- 1 
E0 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

REF ID:A4127224 
E0 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

REF ID:A4127224 
E0 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

REF ID:A4127224 
E0 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

REF ID:A4127224 
E0 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

REF ID:A4127224 
E0 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

REF ID:A4127224 
E0 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

REF ID:A4127224 
RECEIVED 

1954 JAN 4 PM 3 53 

REF ID: A412ifli24 

... - ,., r 

r. , 

... ., ,,,, . 

•• 

. 1-::;i
.· ....... 

.......... 

lBS/9 

1/3 

J/J.J 

.... 111., -

. ,,,,,.-, - ~E 

-~Jt~-:-A65614 

------------. Po~e ligist~t. opeecb secvrS.tJ' oc.,ilpmant 

~ ____________ speoah EOCui-1\J' e:iaipmaa:di. 

_._ ~ 

Impzioved pop-tne radio tel8'~ter with bm.l.t-1D 

securitJ' d.eri.ce 

---------------

-------... --.. 

--------------

._ .... __________ _ 

----------19 

---.---.. ---- lll>l'Oftd facatm11e equipl98Jd; with bu.Ut-1n cipber at.-nc. 

Improved ~t field telet1JHRll"1ter ni..tb bullt-ill 

c:lphttr Cln1ce 

eclassified and a roved for release b NSA on 04-21-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352 
0 

I I 

' 

--~------------

Small ooq>atSt, pol't.able, ~ radio-telepbone rit.b acnabler 

tor uae bn1Nan di dalons. reglmmt.a, bat.aJ 1 '•e DDd patrol.a 

.1D pl.ICe ot wire oireult• 

--~-------- .... 

___ .... ________ __ 

-------------- lllproftd SlCllDI, teletJpe and SlTMBA OOINNd, ao as to code end 

t.ra.IUllll.~ ill one open.tic:n. t~ carrS..- onr radio _______ 19 ____ _ 

__..---

-.......