alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1836 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1836

 To provide for a moratorium on Federal funding to Planned Parenthood 
                      Federation of America, Inc.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 22, 2015

 Mr. Lankford introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a moratorium on Federal funding to Planned Parenthood 
                      Federation of America, Inc.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defund Planned Parenthood Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON FEDERAL FUNDING TO PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION 
              OF AMERICA, INC.

    (a) In General.--For the one-year period beginning on the date of 
the enactment of this Act, subject to subsection (b), no funds 
authorized or appropriated by Federal law may be made available for any 
purpose to Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., or any 
affiliate or clinic of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., 
unless such entities certify that Planned Parenthood Federation of 
America affiliates and clinics will not perform, and will not provide 
any funds to any other entity that performs, an abortion during such 
period.
    (b) Exception.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to an abortion--
            (1) if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or 
        incest; or
            (2) in the case where a woman suffers from a physical 
        disorder, physical injury, or physical illness that would, as 
        certified by a physician, place the woman in danger of death 
        unless an abortion is performed, including a life-endangering 
        physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy 
        itself.
    (c) Repayment.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services and the 
Secretary of Agriculture shall seek repayment of any Federal assistance 
received by Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., or any 
affiliate or clinic of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., 
if it violates the terms of the certification required by subsection 
(a) during the period specified in subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                       [LOGO FOR BY ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP]

                   Consent of Independent Public Accountants

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by 
reference in this registration statement of our report dated March 26, 1999 
included (or incorporated by reference) in Bradlees, Inc.'s Form 10-K for the 
year ended January 30, 1999 and to all references to our Firm included in this 
registration statement.

                                        Arthur Andersen LLP

New York, New York
April 29, 1999
99-1152.

#### State v. Group.

Mahoning C.P. No. 97CR66. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Mahoning County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for extension of time to transmit the record,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for extension of time to transmit the record be, and hereby is, granted, and the time for transmitting the record is extended to September 22, 1999.
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ Michael J. McCannMichael J. McCannChief Financial Officer
Adcote 64

- 120 /CR 857 February 2011 Page 1 of 2Adcote 64

- 120 /CR 857 February 2011 Page 2 of 2

Adcote 64

- 120/CR 857 can react or interact with other components of laminations. Retained solvents, slip

additives, antiblock agents, and contaminated solvents are some of the components that may cause

property cha nges of the film and/or adhesive.

Recommended Operating Conditions

Application Method Roll coater, reverse roll coater, knife over roll, etc.

Application Solids 45

- 55 %

Dry Adhesive Weight 3

- 18 g/m2 (2

- 11 lb/ream), depending on application.

Drying Web T emperature 65

- 80  C (150

- 185  F) , depending on application

Lamination Temperature 65

- 93  C (150

- 2 00  F)

Cure Time* 10

- 14 days at 25  C (77  F)

Cleaning Solvent Methyl ethyl ketone or Ethyl Acetate

*Recommend post curing at 55

- 60  C ( 130

- 140  F) for 5

- 7 days.



### _____________________________________________________________________ Adcote is a registered trademark of Rohm and Haas Company.

These suggestions and data are based on information we believe to be reliable. They are offered in good faith, but without

guarantee, as conditions and method of use of our products are beyond our control. We recommend that the prospective user

determine the suitability of our materials and suggestions before adopting them on a commercial scale.

Suggestions for uses of our products or the inclusion of descriptive material from patents and the citation of specific paten ts in this

publication should not be understood as recommending the use of our products in violation of any patent or as permission or license

to use any patents of the Rohm and Haas Company.

Visit us at http://www.rohmha as.com/AdhesivesSealants

Rohm and Haas Company, Midwest Technical Center, 2531 Technology Drive, Suite 301, Elgin, IL 60124

Phone: 847

- 649

- 3800 Fax: 847

- 649

- 3760
AVS

Quality Management

System

Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with S8

QPM#

AIR-ANM-030-F7

Date: December 17, 2008

Revision

1

Record of Contacts

FDMSDocketNo.FAA-l~Oil- 0020

With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization I Person Contacted Date

ATA Jim (Joe) White 4/[4/2010

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED

Check the Master List 10Verify Thai This is the Correct Revision Before Use
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134550 & (14) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 134550 

 COA: 277045 

Saginaw CC: 90-004299-FH 

DERRICK LASHONE BRADDOCK, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 10, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion to add issue is DENIED. 

s1022 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 29, 2007 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9 
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       4,677,541
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         795,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             9,475,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  5,660,974
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       4,605,316
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,178,520
<LOANS>                                     63,091,659
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,054,726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              94,366,020
<DEPOSITS>                                  81,334,337   
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            908,776
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,983,905  
<COMMON>                                       405,283
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,733,719   
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              94,366,020
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,278,457
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              455,415
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               299,317  
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             6,033,189
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,272,789   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              95,439
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,664,961  
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   45,400
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0 
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,092,169  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,554,913
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,554,913
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,047,673
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.58
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                     82,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   851,000 
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               974,866
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   79,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   113,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,054,726
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,054,726  
        

</TABLE>
• 

.. 
• 

'lb/ l 

I 

..
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Jackpot's
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - September 30, 1999 and June 30, 1999 and
its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income - Three Months Ended
September 30, 1999 and 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          60,264
<SECURITIES>                                     7,439
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,209
<PP&E>                                          34,887
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,818
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  92,530
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,340
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            99
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,940
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    92,530
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,800
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,254
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,134
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,570
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,277
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,293
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .85


</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 1066

ELITO MARIKE SANTOS MENDES , Petitioner ,

v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted : June 27, 2023 Decided: July 25, 2023

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Petition d ismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Elito Marike Santos Mendes, Appellant Pro Se. Duncan Thomas Fulton, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1066 Doc: 24 Filed: 07/25/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:

Elito Marike Santos Mendes , a n ative and citizen of Cape Verde , petitions for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his untimely appeal from the immigration judge’s de nial of his application for deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture and denying to consider the appeal by certification . This Court lacks jurisdiction to review the Board’s discretionary decision not to certify an appeal. See Idrees v. Barr , 923 F.3d 539, 542

- 43 (9th Cir. 2019) (holding that the decision

of whether t o certify a claim is committed to agency’s discretion and not reviewable). Because Mendes did not timely appeal, his remaining claims are unexhausted and will not be considered by this court. See Poole v. Mukasey , 522 F.3d 259, 264 (2d Cir. 2008) (joining other circuits to hold that a late appeal to the Board leaves a petitioner’s claim unexhausted). Accordingly, we d ismiss the petition for review. We deny Mendes’ motions for appointment of counsel and to submit additional evidence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the submissions before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION D ISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 23-1066 Doc: 24 Filed: 07/25/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
REF 

PEOPlE * * 

® OF THE WEEK 

> NEW LEADER IN WEST? A veteran 

campaigner in the East-West ''cold war" 

found himself the center of speculation as 

a possible choice for civilian head oC the 

North Atlantic Trea~y Organization. HP. 

is Lester B. Pearson, Canada's Secretary 

oC State for Extemal Affairs-an advocate of greater powers for the West-em 

alliance whoSC' leaders ha\•e been meeting 

in Paris. 

Mr. Pearson has stakd that any link· 

ing of his name with the NATO past is 

"purely hypotht1:ical," but the speculatio11 continues. Present Secretary-General 

of NATO is Britain's Lord Ismay, who 

has said he would like to reth'(: at an 

early date. 

The Canadian is well known to Amerit·an official circles as a diplomat and as 

a leader in the United Nations. He is 

a former president of the U. N. General Assembly. In 1945, after long service 

as a diplomat. he became Canada's 

second Ambacisador to the U. S. Wherever 

he bas ser\·ed, most of his diplomatic 

colleagues have come to know him as "Mike.·· 

The son and grandson of Methodist 

ministers, Mr. Pearson was born in Toronto, educated in Canada and at Oxford 

University, in England. He was in the 

Royal Canadian Flying Corps in World 

War I, later taught history at the University of Toronto. He is 59, bas headed the 

Canadian Foreign Ministry since 1948. 

He visited Moscow last autumn, urged 

the:; Russians to end tfr" <-"Old war. 

<) 

.. .., .. , .. >l.l -ll1111~J l'r~··;.· 

LESTER B. PEARSON 

••. a NATO job? 

@'pp roved for Release bv NSA on 05-15-2014 pursuant to E .0. 1352\3 

> REWARDED INVENTOR. A hobby that 

became a career finally is paying off for 

an inventor after JS )"ears. Congress bas 

voted to pay William F. Friedman 

$to0,000 f6r all rights to coding machines 

he devised as a Government ('mploye. 

The machines arc top sect-et. No explanation of how they work has leaked 

out. They are believed to scramble messages in such a way that the only method 

of deciphering is to run them through a 

decoding gadget tl;ial is also tbe brain 

child of Mr. Friedman. 

A native of Russia. Mr. Friedman 

came to the U.S. at the age of t, was 

graduatt.'<f from Cor~ell University. He 

became intf'rested i11 cryptography while 

ti,·ing to find a key to authorship of 

Shakespeare's works. which some scholars 

attribute to Francis Bacon. 

During World War I the invenl<>f was 

in the Army Signal Co1·ps as an instructor. Except for three yurs just after 

that war, he worked as a code eKpcrt for 

the Govenum~·nt until he retired last July. 

He is fi-1. 

Because of the secret 11ature or his inv"'ntions. Mr. Friedman was not able to 

capitalize on commercial rights that he 

held. He is "extremely liappy" with the 

$100,000 purchase price, which he sec-s as 

"an incentive to other inventors to work 

for the national defense." 

As for that puzzle invulving Shakc--

spearr, Mr. Friedman is giving his answer 

in a buok he bas written with his wife. 

(Continut!CI nn pagl' 20) 

-1'"1dl" \\"111hl 

WILLI.AM F. FRIEDMAN 

••• $I 00,000 for a secret 

U.S. NEWS&. WORLD REPORT, May 11, 1956
~------

~REF ID:~~ 

Prote•aor J. ~•ter 

l!t.S.rector' Digital. Coowuter ~tor;( lt!asal!hueetts X.titute ot Tochnoloey 

1Ul MaacaehUG&tt. .lvenu4 

c.d:a-14.ge 3~1 MuM!!bu.&et.ta 

~ hotu•or Forreateri 

~. CupcJ..ipa m.a wl.4 x:ae thllt you v:U1 proba:bl.y be 

Nle to va1t ~ 1't.t.1~ ~1't1 ~ tor tbe 2l ~ 

Joiilt l'uel ~~. 

It :rou. vill plan to UTive at 3801 :leo:ruka A'Venue •t la4~ •·•· cc '1. ~' w vlll bave ~one at ~ gatehouse 

to ..i 7°"• 

I u 1Acloa!Dg cq>iea at 70\.t?' travel ordera am. a ~rt.a.tion l"lque&t ~er thi& uip. Alan incloeed tor 

JOUr 

tOl':lll 

couvepJ.enee 

eo that 70U 

1e 

lli!q 

u 

receive 

wt.ruction 

eoapenaaticn 

abeot nth 

t01! 

th! 

JOUr ~ terviees 

u ~tl.¥ u »OQ1ble upon their cqletioc. 

cc: NJ 

c/s 

Sf.ASST~. Frie~) 

"-·>-

liilcerel.J, 

WILLIAM P. l'R~ 

kecutive Secretary 

DA Sc1entitic A4vi.or;r Joe.rd 

M/R: Acknowledges Dr. Forrestei-'a acceptance 

to ,.ttend. 21 Ma.y Joint Panel meeting. Incloses 

al:\- required torms and ord.era in connections with 

trip. Notes time orJ arrival NBA. 

Lt •. J:.T. McDona.ld/6o493/6May54/can 

1 

I 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
Southwest Airlines Co.

Robert W. Kneisley

Associate General Counsel

919 18th Street, NW, Suite 600

Washington, DC 20006

202.263.6284

202.263.6291 – fax

bob.kneisley@wnco.com

______________________________________________________________________________

November 14, 2014 

Via email and regulations.gov 

Mr. Brett Kruger 

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Application of Southwest Airlines Co. for Exemption Authority 

 (SNA-PVR; BWI-SJD); Docket DOT-OST-2014-0193

Dear Mr. Kruger: 

This letter is to confirm that Southwest Airlines Co. (“Southwest”) has polled all 

carriers on the service list attached to the above-referenced Application, and all carriers 

responded that they have no objections. Accordingly, Southwest requests that the 

exemption authority specified in the Application be granted as soon as possible. 

Respectfully submitted, 

_______________________

Robert W. Kneisley

CC: All Parties on the Service List
September 24, 2013

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Economic Impact Analysis for Proposed National Emission Standards for 

Flexible Polyurethane Foam Production

FROM: Tom Walton

AEG (C439-02)

TO: Kaye Whitfield

Engineer, MMG (E143-03)

This document addresses the economic impacts of the proposed National Emission 

Standards for Flexible Polyurethane Foam Production. Economic impact analyses focus

on changes in market prices and output levels. If changes in market prices and output 

levels in the primary markets are significant enough, impacts on other markets are also 

examined.

Both the magnitude of costs needed to comply with the rule and the distribution of these 

costs among affected facilities can have a role in determining how the market will change 

in response to a rule. However there are no costs for this rule. No facility is projected to 

incur costs. There are no expected market impacts because there are no costs to either be

passed on to the purchaser or absorbed.

Because no small firms face control costs, there is no significant impact on small entities. 

Thus this regulation is not expected to have significant impact on a substantial number of 

small entities.
Lt. H. R. Peteraon 

SIBLO Unit, :Box 55 

navy 100, Fro, Nev York 

Dear Pete; 

REF ID:A65204 

310 Second Street, S.E. 

Waah!ngton 3, D. C. 

16 Jurut 1954 

Jlany tbanka ~or ;your note dated l June. ! am 11u1te 

s.stoniahed at the lack ot ahopa containing Be.con-Sbakeepee.re 

literature - the •t:rad" 1eems to have faded out iu England.. 

By the time you receive thi• you vill ha.ve learned 

that I am to be in your :mid.at •oon1 so will let matter• 

reat until we get together on next •tepa to acquire the 

&lWJive literature. 

Many tbanlta tor your contra.tulations on rq 0 recent 

diatinotions 1', &$ you term them. I• m •till catching my 

breath on or about them. 

Is there anything you want me to briUB you :trom 

here? Will be glad. to - provided it'• not too big or 

heavy. 

With beat regards and looking forward to •eeillg you 

all •oon, I am, 

Sincerely, 

WILLIAM F. FRIEDMAN 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-18-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 

,, 

,, 

1i' 

\ "\ 

r. 

" 

I' I\ 

! \ ,\ 

'\ \ 

I 

p 

i \ 

I \
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B) AND

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER
63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

In connection with the Annual Report of Creative Technology Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Sim Wong Hoo, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Sim Wong HooSim Wong Hoo Chief Executive Officer Date: November 16, 2007