Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 42 / Wednesday, March 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules 11607 

Day 1. On the first Form W–2G, S will report 

$2,000 of reportable gambling winnings and 

$560 of backup withholding with respect to 

the 2 p.m. win from keno, and on the second 

Form W–2G S will report $5,000 of 

reportable gambling winnings from keno 

(representing the three payments of $1,500, 

$1,700, and $1,800 that D won between 6 

p.m. and 10 p.m. on Day 1). 

Example 4. In one session on Day 1, E won 

five reportable gambling winnings from five 

different bingo games at a casino T. T 

generally uses the aggregate reporting method 

and in all cases where it is used, T complies 

with the requirements of this paragraph (h). 

Although E signed the entry in the record T 

maintains for payment of the first four 

reportable gambling winnings, E refuses to 

sign the entry in the record for the fifth 

payment of reportable gambling winnings. T 

may use the aggregate reporting method for 

the first four payments of reportable 

gambling winnings to E. However, because 

the entry in the record for the fifth payment 

of reportable gambling winnings does not 

include E’s signature, that payment may not 

be reported under the aggregate reporting 

method. Accordingly, if T uses the aggregate 

reporting method under paragraph (h) of this 

section, T must prepare two Forms W–2G as 

follows: On the first Form W–2G, T must 

report the first four payments of reportable 

gambling winnings from bingo made to E on 

Day 1. On the second Form W–2G, T must 

report the fifth payment of reportable 

gambling winnings from bingo made to E on 

Day 1. 

(i) Payments to foreign persons. See 

§ 1.6041–4 regarding payments to 

foreign persons. See § 1.6049–5(d) for 

determining whether the payee is a 

foreign person. 

(j) Effective/applicability date. This 

section applies to payments of 

reportable gambling winnings from 

bingo, keno, slot machine play, and 

electronically tracked slot machine play 

made on or after the date these 

regulations are published as final 

regulations in the Federal Register. For 

payments made before that date, other 

than payments from electronically 

tracked slot machine play, payors may 

rely on the provisions of these proposed 

regulations. 

PART 31—EMPLOYMENT TAXES AND 

COLLECTION OF INCOME TAX AT 

SOURCE 

■ Par. 3. The authority citation for part 

31 continues to read in part as follows: 

26 U.S.C. 7805 * * * 

§ 31.3406(g)–2 [Amended] 

■ Par. 4. In § 31.3406(g)–2, paragraph 

(d)(3) is amended by removing the text 

‘‘§ 7.6041–1’’ and adding the text 

‘‘§ 1.6041–10’’ in its place. 

* * * * * 

John Dalrymple, 

Deputy Commissioner for Services and 

Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 2015–04437 Filed 3–3–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket Number USCG–2015–0024] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; Rotary Club of Fort 

Lauderdale New River Raft Race, New 

River; Fort Lauderdale, FL 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

establish a temporary safety zone on the 

waters of the New River in Fort 

Lauderdale, Florida during the Rotary 

Club of Fort Lauderdale New River Raft 

Race, on Saturday, April 18, 2015. The 

safety zone will encompass the waters 

between Esplanade Park to just east of 

the Southeast 3rd Avenue Bridge. 

Approximately 100 participants will 

attend the race. The safety zone is 

necessary to ensure the safety of the 

participants, participant vessels, and the 

general public during the event. Persons 

and vessels, except those participating 

in the event, are prohibited from 

entering, transiting through, anchoring 

in, or remaining within the regulated 

area unless authorized by the Captain of 

the Port Miami or a designated 

representative. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be received by the Coast Guard on 

or before April 3, 2015. 

Requests for public meetings must be 

received by the Coast Guard on or before 

April 3, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number using any 

one of the following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket 

Management Facility (M–30), U.S. 

Department of Transportation, West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries 

accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except federal 

holidays. The telephone number is 202– 

366–9329. 

See the ‘‘Public Participation and 

Request for Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for further instructions on 

submitting comments. To avoid 

duplication, please use only one of 

these three methods. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this rule, call or 

email Petty Officer John K. Jennings, 

Sector Miami Prevention Department, 

Coast Guard; telephone (305) 535–4317, 

email John.K.Jennings@uscg.mil. If you 

have questions on viewing or submitting 

material to the docket, call Cheryl 

Collins, Program Manager, Docket 

Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Acronyms 

DHS Department of Homeland Security 

FR Federal Register 

NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

A. Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http://

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

1. Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking, indicate the specific section 

of this document to which each 

comment applies, and provide a reason 

for each suggestion or recommendation. 

You may submit your comments and 

material online at http://

www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment online, it will be considered 

received by the Coast Guard when you 

successfully transmit the comment. If 

you fax, hand deliver, or mail your 

comment, it will be considered as 

having been received by the Coast 

Guard when it is received at the Docket 

Management Facility. We recommend 

that you include your name and a 

mailing address, an email address, or a 

telephone number in the body of your 

document so that we can contact you if 

we have questions regarding your 

submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, type the 

docket number USCG–2015–0024 in the 

‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ 

Click on ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ on the 

line associated with this rulemaking. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
11608 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 42 / Wednesday, March 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

If you submit your comments by mail 

or hand delivery, submit them in an 

unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 

11 inches, suitable for copying and 

electronic filing. If you submit 

comments by mail and would like to 

know that they reached the Facility, 

please enclose a stamped, self-addressed 

postcard or envelope. We will consider 

all comments and material received 

during the comment period and may 

change the rule based on your 

comments. 

2. Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, type the 

docket number (USCG–2015–0024) in 

the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click 

‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket 

Folder on the line associated with this 

rulemaking. You may also visit the 

Docket Management Facility in Room 

W12–140 on the ground floor of the 

Department of Transportation West 

Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. 

3. Privacy Act 

Anyone can search the electronic 

form of comments received into any of 

our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review a Privacy 

Act notice regarding our public dockets 

in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 

Federal Register (73 FR 3316). 

4. Public Meeting 

We do not now plan to hold a public 

meeting. But you may submit a request 

for one, using one of the methods 

specified under ADDRESSES. Please 

explain why you believe a public 

meeting would be beneficial. If we 

determine that one would aid this 

rulemaking, we will hold one at a time 

and place announced by a later notice 

in the Federal Register. 

B. Regulatory History and Information 

Previously, a rule regarding this 

maritime event was published in the 

Code of Federal Regulations at 33 CFR 

part 100. No final rule has been 

published in regards to this event. 

C. Basis and Purpose 

The legal basis for the rule is the 

Coast Guard’s authority to establish 

regulated navigation areas and other 

limited access areas: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 

U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 

U.S.C. 191, 195 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–6, 

and 160.5; Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 

2064; Department of Homeland Security 

Delegation No. 0170.1. The purpose of 

the rule is to provide for the safety of 

life on navigable waters of the United 

States during the Rotary Club of Fort 

Lauderdale New River Raft Race. 

D. Discussion of Proposed Rule 

On April 18, 2015, Fort Lauderdale 

Rotary Club is hosting the Rotary Club 

of Fort Lauderdale New River Raft Race. 

The race will be held on the waters of 

the New River in Fort Lauderdale, 

Florida. Approximately 100 participants 

will attend the race. Minimal spectator 

vessels are expected. 

The proposed rule will establish a 

safety zone that will encompass certain 

navigable waters of the New River in 

Fort Lauderdale, Florida from Esplanade 

Park to east of the Southeast 3rd Avenue 

Bridge. The safety zone will be enforced 

from 3 p.m. until 6 p.m. on April 18, 

2015. 

Non-participant persons and vessels 

may request authorization to enter, 

transit through, anchor in, or remain 

within the event area by contacting the 

Captain of the Port Miami by telephone 

at 305–535–4472, or a designated 

representative via VHF radio on channel 

16. If authorization to enter, transit 

through, anchor in, or remain within the 

event area is granted by the Captain of 

the Port Miami or a designated 

representative, all persons and vessels 

receiving such authorization must 

comply with the instructions of the 

Captain of the Port Miami or a 

designated representative. The Coast 

Guard will provide notice of the safety 

zone by Local Notice to Mariners, 

Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and onscene designated representatives. 

E. Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this proposed rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on a number of these statutes or 

executive orders. 

1. Regulatory Planning and Review 

This proposed rule is not a significant 

regulatory action under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review, as supplemented 

by Executive Order 13563, Improving 

Regulation and Regulatory Review, and 

does not require an assessment of 

potential costs and benefits under 

section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 

or under section 1 of Executive Order 

13563. The Office of Management and 

Budget has not reviewed it under those 

Orders. The economic impact of this 

proposed rule is not significant for the 

following reasons: (1) The safety zone 

will be enforced for only three hours; (2) 

although non-participant persons and 

vessels will not be able to enter, transit 

through, anchor in, or remain within the 

event area without authorization from 

the Captain of the Port Miami or a 

designated representative, they may 

operate in the surrounding area during 

the enforcement period; (3) nonparticipant persons and vessels may still 

enter, transit through, anchor in, or 

remain within the event area during the 

enforcement period if authorized by the 

Captain of the Port Miami or a 

designated representative; and (4) the 

Coast Guard will provide advance 

notification of the safety zone to the 

local maritime community by Local 

Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice 

to Mariners. 

2. Impact on Small Entities 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

the impact of this proposed rule on 

small entities. The Coast Guard certifies 

under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed 

rule will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. 

This rulemaking may affect the 

following entities, some of which may 

be small entities: The owners or 

operators of vessels intending to enter, 

transit through, anchor in, or remain 

within that portion of Biscayne Bay 

encompassed within the safety zone 

from 3 p.m. until 6 p.m. on April 18, 

2015. For the reasons discussed in the 

Regulatory Planning and Review section 

above, this rulemaking will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this rulemaking would economically 

affect it. 

3. Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104– 

121), we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this proposed rule. If the 

rule would affect your small business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact the person 

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 42 / Wednesday, March 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules 11609 

not retaliate against small entities that 

question or complain about this 

proposed rule or any policy or action of 

the Coast Guard. 

4. Collection of Information 

This proposed rule will not call for a 

new collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

5. Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on the States, on the relationship 

between the national government and 

the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. We have 

analyzed this proposed rule under that 

Order and determined that this 

rulemaking does not have implications 

for federalism. 

6. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to contact the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places or vessels. 

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this 

proposed rule would not result in such 

an expenditure, we do discuss the 

effects of this rulemaking elsewhere in 

this preamble. 

8. Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule would not cause a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

9. Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

10. Protection of Children From 

Environmental Health Risks 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This proposed rule is not an 

economically significant rulemaking 

and would not create an environmental 

risk to health or risk to safety that might 

disproportionately affect children. 

11. Indian Tribal Governments 

This proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments, because it would not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

12. Energy Effects 

This proposed rule is not a 

‘‘significant energy action’’ under 

Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. 

13. Technical Standards 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

14. Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 023–01 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD, which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions that do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. This proposed 

rule involves the creation of a special 

local regulation issued in conjunction 

with a regatta or marine parade. This 

rulemaking is categorically excluded 

from further review under paragraph 

34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant 

Instruction. Preliminary environmental 

analysis checklists supporting this 

determination are available in the 

docket where indicated under 

ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or 

information that may lead to the 

discovery of a significant environmental 

impact from this proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, and 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department 

of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Add a temporary § 165.T07–0024 to 

read as follows: § 165.T07–0024 Safety 

Zone; Rotary Club of Fort Lauderdale 

New River Raft Race, New River, Fort 

Lauderdale, FL. 

(a) Regulated Area. The following 

regulated area is a safety zone. All 

waters of the New River between 

Esplanade Park east to just east of the 

Southeast 3rd Avenue Bridge, contained 

within the following points: starting at 

Point 1 in position 26°07′10′′ N, 

80°08′52′′ W; thence southeast to Point 

2 in position 26°07′05′′ N, 80°08′34′′ W; 

thence southwest to Point 3 in position 

26°07′04′′ N, 80°08′35′′ W thence 

northwest to Point 4 in position 

26°07′08′′ N, 80°08′52′′ W; thence north 

back to origin. All coordinates are North 

American Datum 1983. 

(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated 

representative’’ means Coast Guard 

Patrol Commanders, including Coast 

Guard coxswains, petty officers, and 

other officers operating Coast Guard 

vessels, and Federal, state, and local 

officers designated by or assisting the 

Captain of the Port Miami in the 

enforcement of the regulated area. 

(c) Regulations. 

(1) Non-participant persons and 

vessels are prohibited from entering, 

transiting through, anchoring in, or 

remaining within the regulated area 

unless authorized by Captain of the Port 

Miami or a designated representative. 

Non-participant persons and vessels 

may request authorization to enter, 

transit through, anchor in, or remain 

within the regulated area by contacting 

the Captain of the Port Miami by 

telephone at 305–535–4472, or a 

designated representative via VHF radio 

on channel 16. If authorization is 

granted by the Captain of the Port 

Miami or a designated representative, 

all persons and vessels receiving such 

authorization must comply with the 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
11610 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 42 / Wednesday, March 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

instructions of the Captain of the Port 

Miami or a designated representative. 

(2) The Coast Guard will provide 

notice of the safety zone by Local Notice 

to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to 

Mariners and on-scene designated 

representatives. 

(d) Effective Date. This rule will be 

enforced from 3 p.m. until 6 p.m. on 

April 18, 2015. 

Dated: February 20, 2015. 

A. J. Gould, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Miami. 

[FR Doc. 2015–04284 Filed 3–3–15; 8:45 a.m.] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 52, 62 and 70 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2015–0006; FRL 9923–67– 

Region 7] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans, State 

Plans for Designated Facilities and 

Pollutants, and Operating Permits 

Program; State of Missouri 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

revisions to the State Implementation 

Plan (SIP) and the operating permits 

program for the State of Missouri which 

were received on November 6, 2013, 

November 20, 2014, March 27, 2014, 

July 7, 2014, and July 14, 2014. The 

revisions submitted by the state include 

amendments to rules relating to 

reference methods, definitions and 

common reference tables, ambient air 

quality standards, and a rule rescission 

related to air quality control measures 

for sources clustered in small land 

areas. Many of the revisions are 

administrative in nature and either 

incorporate by reference or update state 

rules to match Federal regulations. 

Some are more substantive, but are noncontroversial. In addition, they provide 

more clarity for the regulated public. 

This direct final action will amend the 

SIP to include revised regulations which 

will then be more consistent with 

Federal regulations. These revisions do 

not have an adverse effect on air quality. 

EPA’s proposed approval of these rule 

revisions is being done in accordance 

with the requirements of the Clean Air 

Act (CAA). 

DATES: Comments on this proposed 

action must be received in writing by 

April 3, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2015–0006, by mail to Amy 

Bhesania, Environmental Protection 

Agency, Air Planning and Development 

Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, 

Lenexa, Kansas 66219. Comments may 

also be submitted electronically or 

through hand delivery/courier by 

following the detailed instructions in 

the ADDRESSES section of the direct final 

rule located in the rules section of this 

Federal Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Amy Bhesania, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Air Planning and 

Development Branch, 11201 Renner 

Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at 

(913) 551–7147, or by email at 

bhesania.amy@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA is 

proposing to approve revisions to the 

State Implementation Plan (SIP), the 40 

CFR part 62 state plans (111(d)), and the 

40 CFR part 70 operating permits 

program, for the State of Missouri’s 

requests to amend the following rules: 

1. 10 CSR 10–6.040, Reference Methods, 

received November 6, 2013. 

2. 10 CSR 10–6.040, Reference Methods, 

received November 20, 2014. 

3. 10 CSR 10–6.020, Definitions and Common 

Reference Tables, received March 27, 

2014. 

4. 10 CSR 10–5.240, Additional Air Quality 

Control Measures May be Required 

When Sources are Clustered in a Small 

Land Area, received July 7, 2014. 

5. 10 CSR 10–6.010, Air Quality Standards, 

received July 14, 2014. 

The revisions submitted by the state 

include revisions to update standards 

and reference methods, to clarify, add or 

amend definitions and reference tables, 

to rescind an outdated rule, and to 

update and clarify ambient air quality 

standards. For more information on the 

state’s submissions, specific revisions to 

each rule and EPA’s review of the 

revisions, see the Technical Support 

Document (TSD) that is a part of this 

docket. 

In the final rules section of this 

Federal Register, EPA is approving the 

state’s SIP revision as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

revision amendment and anticipates no 

relevant adverse comments to this 

action. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no relevant adverse comments 

are received in response to this action, 

no further activity is contemplated in 

relation to this action. If EPA receives 

relevant adverse comments, the direct 

final rule will be withdrawn and all 

public comments received will be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed action. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period 

on this action. Any parties interested in 

commenting on this action should do so 

at this time. Please note that if EPA 

receives adverse comment on part of 

this rule and if that part can be severed 

from the remainder of the rule, EPA may 

adopt as final those parts of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. For additional information, 

see the direct final rule which is located 

in the rules section of this Federal 

Register. 

List of Subjects 

40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Lead, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

40 CFR Part 62 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Administrative 

practice and procedure, 

Intergovernmental relations, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

40 CFR Part 70 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Air pollution control, Intergovernmental 

relations, Operating permits, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

Dated: February 13, 2015. 

Karl Brooks, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, the Environmental Protection 

Agency proposes to amend 40 CFR parts 

52, 62, and 70 as set forth below: 

Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart AA—MISSOURI 

■ 2. In § 52.1320 the table in paragraph 

(c) is amended by: 

■ a. Removing under Chapter 5, the 

entry for ‘‘10–5.240’’; and 

■ b. Revising under Chapter 6, the 

entries for ‘‘10–6.010’’, ‘‘10–6.020’’, and 

‘‘10–6.040’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS