alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
,,.. 

REF ID:A44161 

ASSIBTAft SECRETARY ~ WW 

WASHIJIJTCIV 25, J>. C. 

16 January 196.l 

MlQIJlW{I)lM FOR THE SICRl'.WUES Of TliE MILITARY lEPAR'DKN'l'S 

THB DIRICTOB, IEFEriSI RESEARCH AND DGIMDRIHG 

'mE CBAIBNAN, J'Ol.IT CHIE:FS OJ' BTAFI' 

rnE ASII8TAM' SICHITARllS OP IErDSE 

'l'H! GIBP.AL COUllEL 

THI ASllI8T.AITS TO nm SBC.RITARY r:I IliirDS! 

The Secretari•• ot tbl State and I:atena ~ta ban agreed upon a 

progrua to ucbane."'9 a llm1 ted n\lllber aL c1 'rilian an4 111.li:t&r)" per•OZ1D9l 'beuwen 

their orpnir.ationa. The pr1mar)" pw:po• ot tb.11 progra is to proytda train· 

1ng which v:lll prcaote autual understanding and cooperation bet.wen tba tvo 

d9:part;Mn\•, an4 tbe ;per80lll1el tmreo1', •1.Jlee clOH vcr~ rel.at1onah1p• and 

a camuon perspect1ft va •••nti&l to the naU.onal wltare in tm &Na vbere 

tareign policy and 11111 Ul7 polic7 cane in contaot er ewer lap. 

Per•onnel aelected tar aa•ignment to tbe State Dllpertment ~r th1• program abould be ot highest caliber, and t'Utllft uatsi-nt• llhould be v1aual1Rd 

wtch vill ~ive optima benefit traa the u;iertenae. 'l'h8ae ln1U:rtdual.a vill 

beo<IDI, 'IQOn aas1gumm u vaineea, wor.k1Jla JA81Jber• ar the 81;ate n.~nt 

&l!d. 1111.l in no VtQ' 'be carwidered repreaaMIUft• of tm Department or Dd'lm.M. 

At \be pre1ent time a dut7 tour ot tvo 198'1 ia vlR&Uzed. 

Depart;mnt ot DetenM nc:m1nee• tor tbi1 progra v.lll be uii&D14 to the 

Of'ttce ~ the Secret&17 or DefenM for such tr&1nhJg chlt;J 'With tbe State Depaz"tmU't. EYalua:ticm reports on theae peraoMel 'Will be submitted by ap,pro-

>ri&M llUperior• in 'bm hate De~nt, ut1l1d..Dg t.be l'J.Ol'JlWll4 QPJJ,cable 

ld.llt&!T or civilian tCll"IU &D4. procedure a. 

The tlirector at Mld.DS.stratift Servioea, OOD, in conJunctian w1tb tbm Otn.oe o-t the A••istant leare1au-;y ~ DetenM (Ill) vJ.ll arrange 8\11.taba brten.np 

tor all participant.a fat' ~oth Department• prior t.o their rvportb& ~ tb8 nev 

dut7 ... 1.gDZmnt•. Continuing oontact will be 11&1n'k1Dad. by the ~nae ot tbe 

ua111tant 8eoretary at Dttew (ISA) with De,__ J'U'llCl!Ullll A.Nigiwd to the Dilpartiaet at Sute \Rld8r ta. prOSl"am, to enaure ~ uai&Dment• _.. world.ng out 

to thl autual adTantap ot the 1D41.TI.4ual. -4. tM B'-&1ie :Department.. Tba appropriate cmrtaat po1nt W1tbi.Jl that De~ S.• ilia Ottlce ot the De11ut7 1JD4ar 

s.ont.ary tor 1olitiaal Attaua. Matter• ot an .s.ins..tratlft na'ture pertaining 

to tbB program Will b• ntarre4 vi\hin ti. ll9~t ar Dehn .. to tbl Office 

of hraamel Pol.iq• otn.M or tbe A.aaistent Secretary of De:f'enu (MP&R). 

/•/ 

Charl.ea c. ftnucam 

roved for Release b NSA on 10-11-2013 ursuantt E .0. 1352
MDGWmf.l·t 1CI\ HR.. l'JlIEtftA!f 

IUBJEC:h C&tegcxriee at BSA lpec1alt1es 

l. eept, Cbeatopol1 1Wdar M:r. if. 'I. 011rien1 ot the Pe:raomiel 

Plann1J)8 Qsoou;p 1a bandl~ tbia pro4'ect. 

a. It huJ been U.c:ru..-ed at tOlll'.t length Yith Ce.pt .. lohettopol,, 

an<!. v1th I.it. Col. Booth (War Plana and DUuter Plan&). 

J• b. thea4 4ileus11oraa, I ha.Ylt te.tmn the poaition tlat the 

~ed u.t 112.cludea l'la1',}' cr1t1cal lfSA tunat.:tom, but that it omits 

-.ey general.1 u Wll u specitio, f'l.mctiona nectt•llU7 to hltlement 

tho ~· • D1eaatar anti. lla1' Plana. Amr:mg these latter tuncticms 

ue ~ belonging to P/P, UXJ, ua. nas. 

4. It 19 recOt1:11en4ed that the llliXt COJ11m1 ttee meeting on t.hia 

IUbJ•ct inelude ur:mg 1-t. lll'nll:>er• soma high ltmtl people Vbo ue wll 

q,ual.1tie4 1n the overall ~ Jlias1on am. in 1ta Dieatrter and W.v 

Pl&Da. 

5.. lpec1fic olmervationa cm the list in q:ueation ue included 

b. the attached nr to RRS. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-25-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

-
KINDER MORGAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
        EXHIBIT 32.1 - CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the yearly period ending December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  March 4, 2005               /s/ Richard D. Kinder
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                      Richard D. Kinder,
                                      Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
                                      President of Kinder Morgan Management,
                                      LLC, the delegate of Kinder Morgan G.P.,
                                      Inc., the General Partner of Kinder Morgan
                                      Energy Partners, L.P.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6923

AMAECHI OSMOND NWAKUCHE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; WARREN COUNTY, NC; WAKE COUNTY, NC , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:23

- ct

- 03033

- FL

- RJ )

Submitted : January 30, 2024 Decided: February 6, 2024

Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Amaechi Osmond Nwakuche, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6923 Doc: 13 Filed: 02/06/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Amaechi Osmond Nwakuche appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. Nwakuche
v. North Carolina , No. 5:23

- ct

- 03033

- FL

- RJ (E.D.N.C. Aug. 29, 2023) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6923 Doc: 13 Filed: 02/06/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          24,943                  24,943
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,760                   1,760
<ALLOWANCES>                                       200                     200
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,762                  26,762
<PP&E>                                           3,285                   3,285
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,983                   1,983
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,074                  28,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,887                   4,887
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        44,236                  44,236
<OTHER-SE>                                    (21,049)                (21,049)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,074                  28,074
<SALES>                                          2,183                   6,093
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,183                   6,093
<CGS>                                              914                   2,653
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      914                   2,653
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,699                  11,364
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (310)                 (1,083)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,120)                 (6,841)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,120)                 (6,841)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,120)                 (6,841)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.25)                  (0.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.25)                  (0.81)
        

</TABLE>
\ 

\ 

REF ID:A64394 

Jtr. A. !ndup 

l$ll '.hl..pb.®e Iaboratorie•~ law. 

Whiffl&ll11 In JflrM'l 

:Dear Hr. Tradu.pt 

x - Yfll7 ~ '° " able 'to tell JOU that tbe :p:rocouiJsa nquired ~oi- •ulbet •b1p OD \lie 'telttOll"W1nicationa 

Jllu:Mtl of the latiom.1 Seeur1t,y ~'¥ Sc:lentitic M.Til!Oq 

bril bu Ju.st been qompl•Wd 111 J'CNI' .... 

Ve wcu.14 ..W lU:a W Mq;Jaint )'Cit.\ vith the ~1,eht.e 

.r our current orpt>1aatioA u.d it. aWt, ud ..a• 

4*tail.ed preaentat1® ttr 9omt ot cnn- Wchnical probl.eDe. 

A two--da;r vJA1t. to the AptJ.q tlbau.l4 be llUtf'icient tor 

\hU pa"poh1 Ul4 1t Ra M ar~ at. Nli1 ti.a conven1ent 

to l'OU• 

U 1W ¥1U le't • k»ov th:nto oi- tQW° -.u ta a.dvance. 

t4 the date JOU would l1U to .ate thi• Ti•it, and t.ll - tho m4e of tn.V.l )'0\1 pnfU I l will b&T• the Cld.t' of t.be 

l8A Re.iietr:r tor CoMultaut• ~ fCQ tbe llM!eUU)' order• 

.0. thtt 1*P91'i required to .Uect 70U1" orticdal appoiJ1'bQont 

M ~tant. tar tbe J.p'My. 

ll:t.Pl.nS "°Mar tn:a 10U .ocm, l ., 

tiftceNJ.¥1 

cc: AG 

VII.t.TAM 1 • 1"tlt1".AW 

lncut1" S.:nta.q 

l8A lciutitic A4vitf01"¥ Jo.rd 

~~:SST {Mr.FRiednwm)~ ·r<: -IQR~.;a..~-explanatory. PERS (NS.ARC, Mr. Wied.om) 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-16-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
#### Breitengross, Respondent, vs. Farr, imp., Appellant.

*May 25*

June *23, 1898.*

*Negotiable instruments: Accommodation indorser: Parol evidence.*

One wbo in fact signed or indorsed commercial paper for the accommodation of another may show that fact by parol, in an action brought against him by such other.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Price county: John K. Parish, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Wickham & Furr,*and oral argument by *James Wickham.*

For the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of *M. Burry.*

Winslow, J.

This is an action brought by the second in-dorser of a promissory note against Ensign, the maker, and *Farr,*the first indorser, thereof; the second indorser having' paid the note on account of the failure of the maker to pay the same. The appellant, *Farr,*answered admitting his in-dorsement, but alleging that he indorsed it without consideration, solely at the request and for the accommodation of the plaintiff, and introduced evidence tending to show that *216fact. The court, however, directed a verdict for the plaintiff, apparently on the ground that it was not competent to prove by parol that *Farr*was an accommodation indorser. This was error. It is well settled that one who in fact signed or indorsed commercial paper for the accommodation of another may show that fact by parol, in an action brought against him by such other. *Kiel v.*Choate, 92 Wis. 517; Story, Prom. Notes, § 479; 2 Jones, Ev. § 509. The question whether *Fa/rr*indorsed the paper for the accommodation of the plaintiff should have been submitted to the jury.

*By the*Court.— Judgment reversed, and action remanded for a new trial.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

          - [S-143-2014] 

On November 17, 2014, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the City of Waco, grantee of FTZ 246, requesting subzone status subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 246, on behalf of Spenco Medical Corporation, in Waco, Texas. 

                    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (79 FR 69424, November 21, 2014). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval.                 

Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone 246A is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 246's 412-acre activation limit. 

      ( print page 11396)    
Dated: February 23, 2015. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-04393 Filed 3-2-15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
RECORD OF CONTACT WITH PETITIONER

Reference Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0514

On May 7, 2013, at 0900 CDT, Pat Mullen, Steve Thompson, and Wes Ryan of the FAA Small 

Airplane Directorate had a conversation via telephone with ICON Aircraft Vice President of 

Engineering, Mr. Matthew Gionta. Mr. Gionta sought clarification of an April 25, 2013, FAA 

letter that requested additional information in support of the FAA’s analysis of ICON Aircraft’s 

petition for exemption for the Model A5. Mr. Gionta sought clarification of the first sub-bullet 

under the first main bullet on Page 2 of the April 25, 2013 FAA letter, which reads:

• A description of the manner in which ICON Aircraft confirmed the Model A5 meets the 

requirements of those § 23.221(a)(2) standards that encompass other Part 23 sections 

which differ from the consensus standards for light-sport aircraft, i.e.:

− In confirming the Model A5 meets the requirements of § 23.221(a)(2)(i) and 

§ 23.221(a)(2)(ii) , did ICON Aircraft use the wings level stall maneuvers of ASTM 

International Standard F2245, or those of 14 CFR § 23.201?

Mr. Gionta said that because § 23.221(a)(2)(ii) is not related to wings level stalls, this sub-bullet 

of the FAA letter appeared to be a mistake. The FAA explained that the requested information 

pertains to the wings level stall conditions ICON Aircraft used in setting up the tests of § 

23.221(a)(2)(ii). The FAA noted the portion of § 23.221(a)(2)(ii) that references the power and 

airplane configuration requirements of § 23.201. 

Mr. Gionta said the FAA’s clarification was helpful and that ICON Aircraft would supply the 

requested information.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1761 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 346
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1761

                          [Report No. 114-202]

To take certain Federal land located in Lassen County, California, into 
trust for the benefit of the Susanville Indian Rancheria, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 14, 2015

 Mrs. Boxer (for herself and Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian 
                                Affairs

                            January 12, 2016

              Reported by Mr. Barrasso, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To take certain Federal land located in Lassen County, California, into 
trust for the benefit of the Susanville Indian Rancheria, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND INTO TRUST FOR THE SUSANVILLE INDIAN RANCHERIA.

    (a) In General.--The land described in subsection (b) is taken into 
trust for the benefit of the Susanville Indian Rancheria, subject to 
valid existing rights.
    (b) Land Description.--The land taken into trust under subsection 
(a) is the approximately 301 acres of Federal land under the 
administrative jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management identified 
as ``Conveyance Boundary'' on the map titled ``Susanville Indian 
Rancheria Land Conveyance'' and dated December 31, 2014.
    (c) Gaming.--Class II gaming and class III gaming under the Indian 
Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) shall not be allowed at 
any time on the land taken into trust under subsection (a).
                                                       Calendar No. 346

114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1761

                          [Report No. 114-202]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To take certain Federal land located in Lassen County, California, into 
trust for the benefit of the Susanville Indian Rancheria, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 12, 2016

                       Reported without amendment
```
eh Nacsa Art:
ike adh ane:
29 April 1954 

MEMORANDUM Fm COLONEL JONES (COMP): 

SUBJECT; Entertainment Rx;pense Incurred by NSASAB 

The attached bill tram. the Cosioos ClUb or $96.34 covers 

a lW'l.cheon sponsored by NSA tor the :NBA Scientitie Advisory 

Board. on 20 April 1954. The breakdown ot the 'bill tollows: 

Incl: 

a/a 

22 nea.l& at $3.00 ea.ch 

Private dining roo111 

Cocktails 

'2!f, Sales Tax (on $76.oo) 

Total 

:$66.oo 

10.00 

18.82 

l-5? 

$96.34 

WILLIAM F. FRIEDMAN 

Special Assistant 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of TVI  Corporation  (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report") I, Thomas K.  Plunkett,
Vice President Finance and Treasurer,  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/ Thomas K. Plunkett
    Vice President Finance and Treasurer
    August 11, 2003
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-1331 Directorate Identifier: 2012-NE-44-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection 0.0 $ 0.00 $0 $ 0.00 32 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): N/A
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
• REF ID:A415B1i9 .... 

Semis ,iJ.Jt q ~ - ~ 3 ~~,I-, S-3 

*'• M .. l>ean Poat . 

ott1ce. ~ tb9 Adi•tan' ae~·cr Dtteue (it/I>) 

·~ ~ *°• Poats 

. ~ MK\ Mettna of the l&ttoml Secm-1~ AgQcy 8o1ntStlc 

.A4VUOJ7 Baar4 v!U 1- be14 a.\ 1000, Oil l5•lU Octo1- 1953 at 

1ibe lllnal s.curity Btatioth 

At ~ tie, the ~ ot the 8fec;S&J. Stud¥ ~ ~W. be r~ Abmltt.a .tor .,,zroval b7 ti. br4. IA Y1ft ot 

¥OLD' ·~p ~ ~ 0l'CIUP1 Mt ot J0tW VVT val.Uable ccmtr1• 

buttona to its ~".t JOU are ~ lnv1te4 to attQ& 

W• .. tiug ot - a.rd. 

CCI AG · c/s · 

SlASST 

M/R: Invitation to atteJld next BSASAB mtg vbich vUl. pre•eat the 

report ot the Special Stu~ Group for approval of the Board. Mr. Post 

contributed 11Bter1all;v to the report. 

E.B.Yaimg/OO'l/fJo493 

l!\pproved for Release by NSA on 12-01-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352e