alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
~ 

Colonel 1'obert I. Choate, ma 

Alr COlmil!IJ¥\ am 8tatt SCbool 

lilzvell Air Force Jue, Ala'b.ua 

Dec" Colonel Cboate1 

aeterrital to iour letter ot S fe'brutl.ey 1951+, 

Jtr. Will Saa 1'. hie&e.n ia being ot4eftd to Mnvell 

Mr Force Jan on !1Ml:rcb19~1 to 4elivw t.be lecture 

= •ec:.:.anteationt Intell1pnce'* u l"eq'Ul91te4 • 

• vUl .a.vi.. later .. to the date Q4 bcur ot 

id.1 aniva.l bJ' ccumxoeSal a.ircnft. 

cc: NJ 

c/s 

8/ISST (Mr. Fried.man) 

K/Rs Orders being issued tor Mr. W.Friedmn to deliver 

lecture at Maxwell AFB,, Ala. 

M.M.Felersk1/S/ASST/6o493/18 Feb 54 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-25-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 23.4
 
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
We hereby consent to the use in the prospectus constituting part of this
Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Engage Technologies, Inc. of our report
dated March 1, 1999 relating to the financial statements of Internet Profiles
Corporation, a California corporation, which appears in such prospectus. We
also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such
prospectus.
 
 
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
San Jose, California
May 7, 1999
May 29, 2015 

Mr. Wayne Carley 

Publisher/STEM Educator 

S.T.E.M. Magazine, Inc. 

2055 Barrett Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1315 

Kennesaw, GA 30144 

Dear Mr. Carley: 

This is in response to your December 19, 2015 letter sent to the docket (No. FAA-2014-

1099) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of S.T.E.M. 

Magazine, Inc. (S.T.E.M.) for an exemption. You requested to operate an unmanned aircraft 

system to conduct educational operations and monitoring of construction sites. 

By letter dated March 23, 2015, which posted to the docket April 6, the FAA sent you a 

rejection letter asking you to provide the following information: 

 The specific section or sections of the Title 14 Code of Regulations (14 CFR) from 

which you sought relief. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

In your response, posted to the docket on April 8, 2015, you failed to cite the specific 

regulations from which you sought relief. 

 
2

Because your petition does not meet the requirement of 14 CFR § 11.81, the FAA has 

closed your request. Should you reapply, you may submit a new petition for exemption to the 

public docket. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Courtney 

Acting Director 

Office of Rulemaking
Doc ID: 3425317
Doc ID: 3425317
Doc ID: 3425317
Doc ID: 3425317
Doc ID: 3425317
Doc ID: 3425317
Doc ID: 3425317
Doc ID: 3425317
Doc ID: 3425317
Doc ID: 3425317
Doc ID: 3425317
Doc ID: 3425317
Doc ID: 3425317
Doc ID: 3425317
Doc ID: 3425317
Doc ID: 3425317
Doc ID: 3425317
., ,. .... ...... 

REF ID:A62357 

310 8econd Street, 1-E· 

Wa.ahington 3, D.C. 

)1111 tJamet Cbad>era 

80010 Unit, .. 5; 

u.s • ...,. l.00 

Bev York, leY York 

Dear Oumtt1 

JO June 1955 

I 4o =t -.nt to bother ;you or to appear ~tient but X 

"°'114 like to know 1t you have bee.rd.~ a.tall tram L:l.'bertyra 

"1.th rep.rd to the glave1. l aent 70\l a note ee.rq 1Q liq' to Vhioh 

Mr. ltroker ret»lled en 17 ~ tellbg ne tiat :1CR1 l'ad. ,1'ut aoae on 

law. Be aid. iA hi• letter 'that be called Galerie• tatqette, but 

19' "collecticm u 'that rou placed the order with lJ.bert)'"e. At. ~ 

rate, % bave bu.rd nothing further &ad would be appreciative of ~ 

bt'a:t".lm'lticm. )'OU catl CiY• •• 

I incl.o9e herewith '111¥ check t~ .3.50 a4e ou.t to Cf,Uet Williamis 

llhich l ave him tor a Doo1t }IQJ'Cbaaed on "llf1 &CCount. 1laue t.U him 

rq dp&e!&l thank.I tor his courteq. 'l"ell b1a alllo that 1 vroto hia 

.. 1-tter Oil l.I ..,. uld.»g hbt to "9 if he oould bu;1' a. c6u,ple ritCll"'9 

bOoka tar • 1 'but not beari11a trom. him X 1-gine tb&t I~ too l&te. 

flee.ee .U Col.ooel teu..r u4 thank -him tor his wd uice 

lttttt ot l.8 J\me toptber with the ell~ 1.Qcloeed ~tn. Tell 

h1JI alao that lie lhall look tQl"WU'd to. rt.it t;rora them 'boih 4Ur1ll£ 

their Port ata;y in 'W-..hiiagton. \ I 

I am ptth2c alona pN1;tf wll uow a.t home and ·bope l_ °" 

back &t the ott:lce ..., tt. 1n Auaust.. ~ \ 

I 

I 

\ 

I 

I·" ;. / t,~ I 

/.' I 

roved for Release b NSA on 06-16-2014 ursuantto E .0. 1352 

·~ 

... ,_ 

... 

....
. ,_ 

-· . 

-· . REF ID:A66835 • 

(Basic ltr: CGUSAFSS; CCG: 9 Apr 51; Subj: Letter of Apprec~ation) 

lst Ind AFSA-14/wn 

Serial: 632 

~4 ~!?~ ~~©u 

Armed Forces Security Agency, Washington 25, D.C. 

TO: Mr. William F. Friedman, Armed Forces Security Agency, Washington 25, D.C. 

l. It is the responsibility of the Armed Forces Security Agency to assist the Services in their cryptologic efforts, 

and one excellent means consists in furnishing experienced and authoritative lecturers from AFSA. Your broad background and rich experiences in over three decades in cryptology, coupled with your extraordinary talents in this field, make 

you uniquely qualified as a lecturer and brings credit both 

to you and to the Armed Forces Security Agency. 

2. I therefore take pleasure in forwarding this correspondence from General Lynn. 

~ ~'VI 160· ~~OIE 

~ PAmi~l.itl~ u" s. RaV? 

~~.~et~., ~a D'®:!Prmeg soowitv As'm~~v 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 10-25-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

2
1

Pallarino, Bob

From: Tufts, Dean A CAPT NAVFAC HI, 00 <dean.tufts@navy.mil>

Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 8:10 PM

To: Huetteman, Tom; Linder, Steven; Pallarino, Bob; stuart.yamada@doh.hawaii.gov;

steven.chang@doh.hawaii.gov

Subject: TANK UPGRADE / RELEASE DETECTION STUDY FINAL SCOPE OF WORK

Attachments: Red Hill Tank Upgrade-Release Detection-Tank Tightness Study Scope.pdf

Signed By: dean.tufts@navy.mil

Importance: High

Gentlemen - 

As promised and in keeping with our collective commitment to transparency, attached is the final scope for our Red Hill 

Tank Upgrade / Release Detection / Tank Tightness Study. 

These are Attachments 1 and 2 (the relevant parts of the entire package). I have incorporated as many of the EPA 

comments as I could without jeopardizing the August deliverable. This is pre-award documentation, so it may change a 

little during the pre-award process. Because this is still in procurement and pre-award, I ask that you share with only 

those absolutely requiring it. 

NAVFAC Pacific will issue the Request for Proposals this week. Current timeline (including discussions with the potential 

A/E firm) to award is 21 May. I am unable to release the name of the potential A/E firm at this point, but they are 

experts in this field. 

As we have discussed, the Navy/DLA has a window of opportunity (and a captive audience in DC right now) to request 

Red Hill funding in Aug/Sep 2015. This funding request would be part of the regular 2017 budget cycle, so if approved, 

we would not see it until 2017. 

At this point, we just want to get a budget marker in to be able to upgrade the tanks starting in 2017. To do that, we 

need to have a rough order of magnitude cost on possible tank improvements. This study will give us that (see the July 

In-Progress Review Submittal and the August Progress Review meeting). As Steve Linder suggested, I will pursue 

confirmation that we can include EPA/DOH in on the August Progress Review meeting. 

Understanding that we all want the AOC/SOW signed as soon as possible, realistically that may take a few more months 

with public review period, etc... so I must press on with this study now in order have enough information to request 

funding in Aug/Sep. 

Thanks. V/R, Dean 

CAPT Dean Tufts 

Commanding Officer, NAVFAC Hawaii 

Regional Engineer (N4), Navy Region Hawaii 

(w) 808-471-3926; (c) 808-375-3792 

dean.tufts@navy.mil

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY--FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT AND/OR PRIVACY ACT PROTECTED--ANY MISUSE OR 

UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE MAY RESULT IN BOTH CIVIL AND CRIMINAL PENALTIES. 

Please note: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the sole use of the addressed and intended recipient(s) 

and may contain official, sensitive and/or privileged information. Accordingly, any unauthorized review, use, disclosure 
2

or distribution is prohibited and may result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Should you receive this transmission in 

error, please notify the sender via telephone and/or e-mail and destroy this message and all copies you may have in 

your possession.
MYREN CONSULTING, INC.

512 WILLIAMS LAKE ROAD

COLVILLE, WA 99114

OFFICE: 509 684 1154 FAX: 509 684 3987

LAB: 509 685 9458 email: atmyren@gmail.com

DATE: 28 March 2011

TO: Gil Wood

CC: Rod Zander, Tim Seaton

FROM: Ben Myren

RE: PROPOSED 2.0 G/HR DAILY AVERAGE STANDARD FOR MASONRY HEATERS

The proposed 2.0 g/hr daily average standard for masonry heaters 

may not be the best way to look at this issue because the proposed 

standard appears to discriminate against large heaters. The daily average 

emission rate is affected by 4 things: (1.) the heater’s performance, (2.)

the test method used to measure heater performance, (3.) the firing 

interval used to determine the daily average and (4.) whether or not the 

correction factor used to convert M5G to M5H is used to adjust the 

emissions. Here some examples based upon typical numbers for a small and 

large unit, both having emission factors right at 1.0 g/kg when cordwood 

is being burned as fuel.

Small Unit (20-30 lbs. of fuel/ firing)

Test Method g/hr Firing Interval Daily Average

CO Reg # 4 6.5 12 hours 0.542

ASTM Crib 5.0 12 “ 0.417

Cordwood 3.0 12 “ 0.285

Large Unit (40-60 lbs. of fuel/ firing)

CO Reg # 4 12.0 12 hours 1.000

ASTM Crib N/A

Cordwood 9.0 12 “ 0.750

A wood stove burning continuously at 4.5 g/hr and at 1 kg/hr would 

emit both 4.5 g/kg and 4.5 g/hr and in a 12 hour period would, depending 

upon its size, probably burn somewhere between 20 and 40 lbs of wood. So 

its daily average would be 4.5 g/hr, which is significantly higher than 

any of the MH daily averages in the above examples. Even if the emission 

factor were to increased to 2.5 g/kg – and the dry burn rate remained the 

same - the emission rate would still be below the proposed daily average 

for the small unit. But the emission rate for the large unit would now be 
above the proposed standard. However, if the firing interval were to be 

changed to 24 hours, the unit would remain in compliance. Conversely, if 

the firing interval were to be changed to 8 hours, the emissions would 

change (increase). So how the daily average standard is calculated will 

have a huge impact on whether or not units can be certified or not. 

So in my mind the real question is, “Do we really need a daily 

average standard?” If the emission factor is set at ≤2.5 g/kg, then the 

issue of a daily average standard is not really important because the low 

emission factor insures a low emission rate. 

Let me know if you have any questions.

Regards, 

Ben Myren
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(a)


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (no. 33-85558; No. 333-57379) of CITATION Computer
Systems, Inc. of our report dated May 11, 1998, except for Note 20 which is as
of June 24, 1998, which appears on page 27 of the Financial Information Insert
to the 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders of CITATION Computer Systems, Inc.,
which is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for
the year ended March 31, 1998. We also consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule, which appears in
Exhibit 23(b) to this Form 10-KSB/A.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
July 27, 1998
REF ID:A72451 

r---- __ .. - -.--·-----......--~-

1 I I I • 

--------jgpproved for Release by NSA on 09-17-2013 pursuantto E .0. 13520~-
~p SJIJ(ff!'f 'EffifM: 

~ ;rm cotem.c=JSUKlJ> 

SUBJECTt 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

EQ 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

In conoootion Vith the aeries ot Sigint histories p:re~red 

at tho G.C. l'!i C.S. on the 'World War II aQt1vit1ea, apecifica:.tJ,y 

in connection Vi.th the vo~ on I .... ____________ _ w are lacking o.ne at too a.c. • c.s. hiltorical aup~rting documente, 

itt.q.u.1.re e.a to the availe.bility o.t & cow or the mi#.eing section to 

V'b.ich reference 1• mo.def 

WILLIAM 1' • J'Rlm.tA.ff 

Speoia.l Aa.s1•tant 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-09-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,076,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,815,000
<BONDS>                                      1,525,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,000
<COMMON>                                         4,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,562,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,076,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               500,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             328,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (828,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (828,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (828,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.88)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.2

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
Engage Technologies, Inc.:

The audits referred to in our report dated June 4, 1999, except for note 16,
which is as of July 19, 1999, included the related financial statement
schedule as of July 31, 1996, 1997 and 1998, and April 30, 1999, and for the
three years ended July 31, 1998 and the nine month period ended April 30,
1999, included in the Registration Statement. This financial statement
schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our
audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We consent to the inclusion of our report dated June 4, 1999, except for note
16, which is as of July 19, 1999, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets of Engage Technologies, Inc., as of July 31, 1997 and 1998, and April
30, 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the
three year period ended July 31, 1998 and the nine months ended April 30,
1999, which report appears in this Registration Statement, and to the
references to our firm under the headings "Selected Consolidated Financial
Data," and "Experts" in this Registration Statement.


/s/ KPMG LLP
KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
July 19, 1999
: .... 

!o...-- r REF ID:A70455 

,,_}_ 

(_= 

19AUG1111 

JADP 

SUBJECT Proposed Bm tor the Rella.t of Ur William 'I' Friedman and 

Potential Claim - CrsJ>to,bl"&Phic Inventions 

!O: D!rector, Arasd Forces SecuriQ' .&genq 

lfaahington 25, D C. 

l. 1'l:ds o!'.tice received the commd.ca.Uon ot 23 Ju]J" 1951 f'rclil. 70Gr 

ottice subject u above, recazmaencb.n.; that a reply in this matter be mde 

t,o ~ Friedman's attorneys, liessrs Fl.sober, Will.1s and Pamer, aubstant~ 

as outlined 1n paragraph 4 ot le"er to your ot.tice lrclll this office dated 

S JulJ 1951 In view ot the forozoin&, thia office COlJl!l.unicated with lifr 

Friedma.nts attom&JS, b7 latter dated 9 J;agust 19SJ., CO'f!1' or which 11 

enclosed,, for 70ur intor.blation and guidance It 1l'ill. be noted that in 

this letter the attomeya were informed that it is the policy o!' the Department of Defense not to e:&p1'88S its views to private individ.Jal.s with regard 

to the proposed introduction of le61slation, or 'Iii th respect to the desirability or und.esil'ablli\y of pasB&goe or proposed legislation, except upon 

call from a cot:mdttee or the CoDg'7%'0SS 

2 Careful reconsideration has been ~ven th.ia :matter since addressing 

the above aentianed. communication o! 9 A~us t 19Sl to J.ar FrJ.edman •a 

at"torne18 Aa a resul.t, it has been concl.uded insolar as this o.ttice :I.a 

concerned \hat, 1naamuch as a bill. for 1.r Friedman's rel.1.et my never be 

presented to the Congress and hence there would be no need in this connection 

for the resu1ts of the extended investigation requested .:ln the letter of 

S Jul;r 1951 from th1a office, completion of this invesilga:tion 1B wmeceaaar.r 

tml.eaa and until & bill is actuall.y' presented to the COD.c:.PftBs 

3. Your o.tf ice 1l1l.l be :f.nf ormed proq,tJ.7 11' and when this o!lice 

receives in!'ormation that any bill on 1!E" Frledman1a behalf has been 

presented, or should there be any other important developaent 1n this •tter. 

J'OR mE JUDGE ADV'OO.A.!r. GBNEBA.La 

l J.hcl 

Copy ltr 9 AUG 51 

pproved for Release by NSA on 08-29-2013 

ursuant to E.O. 13526 

WILLA.RD J HOOOES., JR. 

Lieutenant Colonel., JAOO 

Chief, Patents Division 

3(7 ~- .J"I 

)u.c..t' c.,.(...<.. ~ (-\.-<-1.,,- or.. 

z-- ~f 1 S....1r- -;J' 

I -
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001016006
<NAME>                        CLOSURE MEDICAL CORPORATION
       
<S>                                            <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         824,064                 7,277,029
<SECURITIES>                                   15,878,220              17,232,585
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,190,847               1,226,416
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,008,451               346,563
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               19,187,938              23,633,846
<PP&E>                                         8,602,954               4,055,267
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (896,171)               (361,401)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 27,420,487              30,419,720
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,565,900               3,930,208
<BONDS>                                        0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                    0                       0
<COMMON>                                       132,904                 132,425
<OTHER-SE>                                     18,117,436              22,286,491
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   27,420,487              30,419,720
<SALES>                                        8,078,781               1,551,470
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               9,578,781               1,551,470
<CGS>                                          3,479,765               1,397,960
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,479,765               1,397,960
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               11,703,872              8,347,203
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             383,212                 71,736
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,773,366)             (6,828,712)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,773,366)             (6,828,712)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0                       0
<CHANGES>                                      0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,773,366)             (6,828,712)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.36)                  (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.36)                  (0.53)
                                                            

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                              15
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      119
<ALLOWANCES>                                         3
<INVENTORY>                                        101
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   356
<PP&E>                                             471
<DEPRECIATION>                                     228
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              245
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                         277
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       807
<SALES>                                            601
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   602
<CGS>                                              427
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      609
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    45
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (6)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (2)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (4)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (4)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)
        

</TABLE>