alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- . ,- • 

REF ID:A59631 r&n ,,_....,~-in~,,. • .., DD011'D1 

~QP S!C'RR y. 8. l!iDi'8 9.Hll FINAL 

SUBJECT NUMBER 

USCIB: 13.5/48 

Subject: 

Item B (Not on Agenda) Considered at the lOlst Meeting 

of USCIB, held on 12 March 1954. 

The Anderson Case. 

CAPTAIN TAYLOR informed the Chairman that some of the members have 

indicated that they would like a report from Mr. Armstrong on further 

developments in the Anderson Case. 

THE CHAIRMAN asked Mr. Armstrong if he had anything to reporl;. 

MR. ARViSTRONG reported that as a result of USCIBEC discussion of the 

subject on 4 March 1954 an efforl; had been made to locate Anderson 

through queries to the Embassy in Belgrade and the Consulate in Zagreb. 

Both replies, he said, were negative, and it appeared that further action 

would have to await additional information which will lead to this man. 

THE CHAIRMAN asked if the matter has been ta.ken up with any echelon 

of the Yugoslav Government. 

MR. ARMSTRONG replied that it had not. He suggested that the FBI be 

asked to make discreet inquiries as to Anderson's present whereabouts. 

After a brief discussion it was agreed that the FBI member would 

proceed to instigate such investigation as his Bureau deems appropriate 

to find out if Anderson is in contact with his family in the U.S., and 

keep the Executive Secretary advised of developments. 

The members went on to discuss possible ways and means of preventing 

such occurrences in the future, and Captain Taylor suggested further 

consideration of recommendations he had made previously. He reviewed the 

main points of his plan, which would establish a procedure by which 

Department of State passport authorities would check, through SPS and the 

Executive Secretary, to determine whether travel restrictions are 

required in cases of requests for passports by individuals who have 

recently been employed in positions requiring a knowledge of COMINT. 

It was ultimately- agreed that the Executive Secretary would prepare 

a recommendation along the lines indicated and submit it for USCIBEC 

consideration in time to permit the matter to be taken up again by the 

Board at its next meeting. 

USCIB: 13.5/48 - 14 -

TOPSEGRBT 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-25-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
.. ,,. 

' 

• 

REF ID:A59631 

'f'OP SECRET • 

'±'QP SES~ \1.8, E'Dlt O)Jll 

USCIB: 13.5/48 

DECISION: (12 March 1954) USCIB: 

a. Agreed that the FBI would proceed with such action ae it deems 

appropriate to determine if Curtis Benjamin Anderson has been in communication with his family in the U.S., and keep the Executive Secretary 

advised of developments. 

b. Directed the Executive Secretary to prepare recoIIDI1.endations 

designed to prevent future occurrences of this kind (the Anderson 

Case), and submit such recommendations to USCIBEC .for review in time to 

permit consideration of them by USCIB at its next meeting. 

USCIB: 13.5/48 - 15 -

TOPSEGRBf'
# AVS

Quality Management System Title: Domestic NewAction Worksheet with S8 QPM# AIR-ANM-030-F7 Date: December 17,2008 Revision 1 

## Record ofContacts FDMSDocketNo.FAA-l~Oil- 

# 0020 With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization I Person Contacted Date ATA Jim (Joe) White 4/[4/2010

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED Check the Master List 10Verify Thai This isthe Correct Revision Before Use
EX-10.7





Exhibit 10.7


AMENDED EXHIBIT “A” TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

BETWEEN SYKES ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED AND 

LANCE R. ZINGALE



	 	 	 
	BASE SALARY:
	 	$6,192.31 per week payable biweekly
	 
	 	 
	PERFORMANCE BONUS:
	 	Eligible to participate in a performance based bonus program ranging from 0% to
 60 % of base salary
	 
	 	 
	FRINGE BENEFITS:
	 	Eligible for standard executive benefits




THIS COMPANY RESERVES THE RIGHT, AT ITS DISCRETION, AT SUCH TIME OR TIMES AS IT ELECTS, TO CHANGE
OR ELIMINATE THE PERFORMANCE BONUS, INCENTIVES, OR OTHER BENEFITS.



          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amended Exhibit “A” as of the
29th day of September , 2008 .



	 	 	 	 	 
	SYKES ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED	 	EXECUTIVE
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:
	 	/s/ James T. Holder	 	/s/ Lance R. Zingale
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	James T. Holder	 	Name: Lance R. Zingale
	 
	 	Sr. Vice President	 	 





			
	Executive at will	 	 
	Revised 07/07	 	Initial




Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated

Page Number 11
REF ID:A415Bi11 

Dr 

~ 

• .Tebn 'W. ~ 

ot ... \btatk• ~vat'Nft1t7 

~ ..... ..,. 

DMTDr. "*-" 

-

Sei>tal: 2 .2 fo 0 

14 APR 1954 

la • )'INrioue lMtw '° 70'11 ·1, ......... ._, •"4.WJ\ to ... 20-21 At:ftl .... ot ..... a.s...i &eewlq ~ lol...ufle 

. A4ritiD17 .._., tJ1e J*lel ~# 16o .. al.lo SI ti.. ~ tM 

lollr4, vW. lie 61e to .... VS.t>l ,.. - .... of .-.i oqud.· 

.U• ·u& MUN actln•S.· 

v. ... w -....11src a ~o18' .nDc or .u-.. paneia a1 

\balr cMhwa Oil 29-21 .,. lj5lt. .....,_ tlw ~ fJl tbe fin\ 

...,, all ~ IWOPIUI")" ~ft tnail.9 ¥111 \it acc:t0111>1il1M4. 

Bal• Poul4 l'91[Jift Glll1' • CCNPle of 111oma. 'Die I ildft" at .. nm 4aJ vSll lllll ~ to ~-,.. Vlti. u. 1a1•u_.. ot tbe artUdl&ticll u4 it. natt. 9111 ...oa4 ,.,, 11 Mq, "111 

1aie iwat4l4 to a deW.1.e4 pl'elU'-"1• u4 ~ dt W ~ 

~ t.te.. Mdmt-.1 l'l'dblW . u4 - »lW tw ....... Jlllll ~ 

It. ta a~q hopld. 'tJaat J"" 'Vtll 1te Ola to ~ the 

Metiap - --· tlwile ... 

It JW vUl. let • know' ~ 10'1- plaa to attend 41'1! thlt -4e 

ti trQ'ftl 1"* ~, I V1U .._ tM -~ trenl .S.a Mat 

to J°DU• . 

·. 

\llLUAM ., • fBtCllWI - blft.Uft •••• ...,. · & lelmttte ~ .._.. 

M/!h Am'10uuee8 301nt meeting o~ P..ia at EABO, and iDvites 

attendance ct aeni>ez'•~ · · · 

. !T MCDOiiiid/UtLt ,USA1 I 

A11t to S/ASS'l/ero , 

ccz AG S 

~/~ (~. fj ,, . @'pproved for Release by NSA on 12-01-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           9,446                   9,446
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,680                  38,680
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        962                     962
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,974                  49,974
<PP&E>                                         602,957                 602,957
<DEPRECIATION>                                 180,789                 180,789
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 472,142                 472,142
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,972                  47,972
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           313                     313
<OTHER-SE>                                     363,262                 363,262
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   472,142                 472,142
<SALES>                                         45,516                 132,959
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,341                 136,053
<CGS>                                           19,455                  62,476
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,050                  94,335
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,146                  11,212
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  17                   3,154
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,128                  27,352
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,230                  10,393
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,898                  16,959
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,898                  16,959
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22                     .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22                     .62
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PharmaKinetics Laboratories, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James M. Wilkinson, II, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ James M. Wilkinson, II, Ph.D.
---------------------------------
James  M. Wilkinson, II, Ph.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer

February 14, 2003
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCUIT

No. 10-60342 Summary Calendar
KHALID UMER, Petitioner v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A38-802-967

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * On January 9, 2012, the Supreme Court vacated this court’s judgment entered on March 11, 2011, and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Judulang v. Holder , ––– U.S. ––––, 132 S. Ct. 476 (2011). In Judulang U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f Ap p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D March 6, 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Pursua nt to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5 , the court hasd ete rm inedthat thisop inion s houldnot * be publish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-60342 Document: 00511779058 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/06/2012No. 10-60342

the Court co n s i d e red the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) “comparablegrounds” rule for determining whether t o s u m m arily deny deportable aliens’ applications for discretionary waivers under former § 212(c) of the Immigration 1 and Nationality Act. The Court held that the comparable-grounds rule is
arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A). Ju d u lang, 132 S. Ct. at 479. In this case, the BIA relied on the comparable-grounds rule in denying Petiti oner Khalid Umer individual consideration of his § 212(c) application. Judulang does not require the BIA to give individual consideration to every § 212(c) application filed by a deportable alien who is otherwise eligible to seek § 212(c) relief. The Supreme C ourt explained that “[i]n rejecting th[e] rule, we do not preclude the BIA from trying to devise another , e qually economical policy respecting eligibility for § 212(c) relief, so long as it comports with everything held in both this decision and St. Cyr .” I d

. at 490. Accordingly, it suffices to send this case back to the BIA to reconsider its decision regarding whether Umer’s application should be considered on its individual merits. We GRANT Umer’s petition for review, VACATE the BIA’s judgment, and REMAND the case to the BIA for reconsideration in light of Judulang

.

8 U .S .C. § 1182(c) ( 1994)

. 1 2 Case: 10-60342 Document: 00511779058 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/06/2012
REF ID:A64582 

SECRET 

26 October 1954 

Colonel. l'Jarton 8. Pulling,, USAF 

St.BID, lmldon 

Dear »a.rt t 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Among the items ot intereJttold :m& b)"Proteasor Wilks, 

in re h1• recent visit to ~Q. w.a one concerning aome atuMea 

nov 1.11 progress there μnd.Or I ~· ~ae nave to do\ with •at00 1dec•'tir!8 people tor :poasi,ble eeyptanalytie abil.-

i ty, and. ahd hie aeaoaates ba: ... /:ve devi•ed cel'tain aide· .. called " o.g.rea11ve Matricee .. " 

Wilks tbo'Uiht thatl latu<liea and these -.trices a.re 

tar 1n advance of NJ¥thlng elae he t • seen or beard about. YQU. ~ well be aware that ISA is nov having aoma similar atudie1 

a.db 'by a fil'lll ot consult~ peychometrists. Hence, I I 

-work would. b& ot great intere•t and perhaps 111Ch help to lfSA. 

Would. you be ao aood a. to tind out vhe.t you can aXld. 

ma:)'be pt u.mples ot tno -.trices, instructions tor their 'Wlo, 

.-tc. 

About the natter or Dr. aooo., you viU •oon heo.r :trom mo 

on that. 

Sincerely, 

WILLIAM :r • J'RIEU4A.K 

lpecial A81iatant 

SECRET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-16-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
National UAS Solutions, LLC

104 Raphael Drive Lafay ette, LA 70508
Ju LY 2 , 2015 Exemption No. 11570 Regulatory

Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0347
U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room W12

- 140 1200 New Jersey

Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 **Re: Request to amend Exemption No. 11570 to allow National UAS Solutions, LLC**  **to add the**  **MOZI ROBOTICS QUADTHRUST 350 s**  **UAS platform under**  **the same direction and limitations as provided within Exemption No.**  **11570, docket #FAA**
  ** 2015**
**- 0347, approved on May 13, 2015.** 
Dear Sir or Madam, National UAS Solutions, LLC was issued an exemption under Section 333 of the “FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 ” numbered 11570 for the purpose of gathering aerial data u sing the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision+ sUAS. Since the exemption was granted, National UAS Solutions, LLC has determined the need to add the MOZI ROBOTICS QUADTHRUST 350 quadcopter to the exemption in order to remain competitive and enhance services afforded our customers. The airworthiness of the MOZI ROBOT IC S QUADTHRUST 350 is materially similar and a direct replacement of the alread y approved DJ I Phantom 2 Vision+

. The MOZI ROBOTICS QUADTHRUST 350 has a gross weight under 55 pounds, forward speeds of less than 50 knots and an altitude restriction of under 400 feet. Th is sUAS will be operated in accordance with the limitations and restrictions enumerated in Exemption No. 11570 alread y granted National UAS Solutions, LLC.Because the requested amendment would not set any precedent or otherwise raise an y n ovel issue, and because the addition of th is sUAS platform to our fleet will not materially affect our already granted petition No. 11570 in any way , and because National UAS Solutions, LLC seeks to begin these operations without delay, National UAS Solutions, LLC respectfully requests the FAA to determine that good cause exists to dispense with publication of the summary of this petition in the Federal Register and grant the requested amendment expeditiously b y summary means. Thank you for your kind consideration in the granting of this amendment. Best regards,

Charles R. O’Neal, Jr. President/CEO National UAS Solutions, LLC Lafayette, Louisiana 705 08 337.288.1793 coneal@nationaluassolutions.comMOZI ROBOT IC S QUADTHRUST 350 SPECIFICATIONS

Weight (including battery and propellers: 1250g or 2.75 pounds Hover Accuracy : Vertical: 0.8 m/ 2.6 feet Horizontal: 2.5 m/8.2 feet Max Yaw Angular Velocity : 200 degrees/sec Max Tiltable Angle: 35 degrees Max Ascent/Descent Speed: Ascent: 6m/sec or 1200fpm Descent: 2 m/sec or 390fpm Max Forward Flight Speed: 15m/sec or 33.5mp h Safety : Return to Home Failsafe (loss of signal and low battery) Diagonal Motor to Motor Distance: 350mm or 13.780 inches Engines: 4 T

- Motor MN2214 (electric) Battery : 11.1V 5100mAh L iPo Battery
## NO. 12-08-00198-CR IN THE COUR T OF APP EALS TWELFTH COURT OF APP EALS D ISTR ICT

TYLER, TEX AS

CAV EN DEWAY

NE MOORE, § APPEAL F ROM THE 2ND APPELLANT V . § DISTRIC T COURT OF TH E ST ATE OF TEX AS, APP ELL EE § CHER OK EE CO UN

TY, T EXAS MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION PER CU RIAM This appea l is being dismissed for wa n t o f j u risdiction. Appellant was c onvicted on two counts of ag g ravated sexual assault of a c hild. Sentence wa s imposed on J anuar y 16, 2008. Texas Rule of Appellate Proc edure 26.2 provides that an a ppeal is per fec ted when notice of a pp e a l is fi le d wi thi n thi rt

y da y s a ft e r t he da y se nte nc e is i mpo se d o r s us pe nd e d in op e n c ourt

un le ss a motion for new tria l is ti mely filed. T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.2(a) (1). W here a timely motion for new trial has bee n filed, not ice of appea l shall be filed within ninety day s afte r t he sentence is im posed or suspende d in ope n court. T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.2(a) (2). Appe llant timely filed a motion for ne w trial on Fe bruar

y 13, 2008. There fore , his notice of appe al was due t o h ave been f iled on or bef

ore Ap ri l 15 , 2 00 8. Ho weve r, Ap pe lla nt d id n ot f

ile his no tic e of

a pp e a l un til Ap ri l 30 , 2 00 8 a nd did n o t fi l e a mot ion for extension of time to file his notice of appe al as pe rmitted by Texas Rule of Appellate Proc edure 26.3. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.3 (appe llate court may extend time for f iling notice of appe al if, within fiftee n day s after deadline f

or filing notice of a p p ea l , ap p el lant files notice of a pp e a l in tr ia l c ou rt

a nd mot ion c omp lyingwi th Texa s Ru le of Ap pe llate Pr oc e dure 10 .5 (b ) i n appellate court).2

On May 8, 20 08 , App e lla

nt fi le d a motio n re qu e sti ng a n exte ns ion of tim e fo r fi lin g his Rul e 26

. 3 motion along with a motion to extend the time for filing his notice of appe al. Texas Rule of Ap pe lla te Pr oc e du re 26 .3 pr ov ide s th a t a mot ion fo r e xten sio n o f time to fi le a no tic e of a pp e a l mu st be filed w ithin fifteen day s o f t h e d ea d line for f iling the notice of appe al. T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.3. Acc ording ly , Appellant wa s require d to f ile his motion on or bef

ore A pril 30, 2008. Howeve r, the motion was not filed until May 8, 2008, and ther efor e wa s untimely

. See id . Be cause this court has no authority to allow the late f

iling o f a n o t i ce of appe al except as p ro v i d ed by

Rule 26.3, the appe al must be dismissed. See Sla ton v . St ate , 9 8 1 S. W. 2 d

2 0 8 , 2 10 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 98 ); Ol iv o v . St ate , 9 1 8 S

. W

. 2 d 5 1 9 , 5 2 2 ( T e x . C r i m . A p p . 1 9 9 6 )

. A c c o r d i n g l y, Ap pe lla nt’ s mo tio ns a re ov e rr

ule d, a nd the a pp e a l is dism issed for want of ju risdiction

. Opinion delivere d May

14, 2008. P an el consi s t ed of

W ort hen, C. J. , G r i

f f i t h, J. , and H oyl e, J.

(DO N OT PUBL I SH)
'OOS/O 

Capt J.s. Boltviek, USB 

~ 

Dapu-tment c4 tbe Air Farce <c·tbe-Job ~1n1ng 

- 8eJl1or Red1o Interce~ O,perator; JP 19352 

8/A l.4 Feb 55 

l. At th&~ ot ISA'• Cluaification AdY111Q:r7 tuel Oil 10 :rebrufU7 l95~1 .,_ topic ot d11CUaaian wa tbe content ~ a »OrUon ~ ti. attacbod ;publication, 

•Department ot the A.it Force OD-the.Job binina Prosram • 8eQ1or Ra41o liitereept 

0.PU&tor, JP 29352," u unclaaaU'ied Plblicaticm. 

I• tou:i- attention,. u the BSA. me.n1>er ot USCXBEC, 1a illvited. to the 

p;D>Uea.tion u a vbole, aa. in i:articular to the l.ut 'Ji&l'&P'a:Ph on~ 4-u. 

'l'hU :pa.rasre.ph 11eew1 Ul-e.dviaed tram uot ODl¥ the IJt.aD4llo1nt ~ .ecurit;y 

1n an 'UllClaa•1t1ed publtca.t1on but alao ot MCUX'&C1 or cmm. o.f that at a». 

a.ttem.pt at .. :moclicum of 6aception Vhicb vould. aeceiTe ~. 1'!W! Clus1t1cat1on 

A4Y110ry !'Imel agreed that th1• ehould be b.rQught to the attention or tJSCIBEC. 

J• !bi• mn'-1,,... brought to J11¥ attention by Mr. Cal.Um.hos or oo-. 

• 414 J10t ?mo"• Vbether the Air !r.rainirc Conualld lBa publillhed. other "On ... thaJob tn.inina ~" tor otb&" pbue• ot tbe erntolog1e f"teld. Thi• 

iohlt ~tl.d alAtq. - ~atip.ted 1t 8eelllfl to•, to aacerta1n what the 

Air Tft.'11d;og Conmntt bu pat out on INCh Joba .. tratt1c aml7at1 crypt .. azalpt. etc. 

11XL'LlAK .,. • ftI!J.W.11 

Cba:1rmn 

Cl.Mait:\~t!Qn Mv1eor;y Plm<:rl 

Declassified and approved for release_ by N_S_A on 06-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352\3 

- -

_..
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4918

_____________________________
V IDA V ONGSAY , Appellant,

v.

M ARK A NTHONY D RURY , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County

. Steven Fahlgren , Judge

. June 26, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R AY , B ILBREY , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Michael L. Du n can, Duncan Trial & Family Law, Jacksonville
, for Appellant.

Matthew L. Rhodes, Callahan
, for Appellee.
STOCK CERTIFICATE



 Exhibit 4.1 

 
 Number White clove health WGH S H A R E S
COMMON STOCK SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS CUSIP 964858 10 4 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THIS CERTIFIES THAT: is the owner of FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, $0.0001 PAR VALUE, OF BY:
WhiteGlove Health, Inc. AMERICAN transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of the certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until COUNTERSIGNED counter signed by the
Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. STOCK AND WITNESS the facsimile signatures of the Corporation’s duly authorized officers. (New Dated: York, TRANSFER & REGISTERED: TRANSFER NY) TRUST AGENT AUTHORIZED AND COMPANY, LLC
SECRETARY AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SIGNATURE REGISTRAR 
  





 







 



 
  
 The
following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM – as tenants in common UNIF GIFT (TRANS) MIN
ACT Custodian (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT – as tenants by the entireties JT TEN – as joint tenants with right under Uniform Gifts (Transfer) to Minors of survivorship and not as Act tenants in common (State) Additional abbreviations may also be
used though not in the above list. FOR VALUE RECEIVED, hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS OF ASSIGNEE Shares of the stock
represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said Stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated notice: THE SIGNATURES TO
THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE ) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER. ) Guaranteed By THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR
INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.