11236 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Notices 

action included in Section II of this 

document and incorporated by reference 

in this finding. On the basis of this EA, 

the NRC concludes that the proposed 

action will not have a significant effect 

on the quality of the human 

environment. Accordingly, the NRC has 

decided not to prepare an 

environmental impact statement for the 

proposed action. 

This EA and FONSI is based on the 

licensee’s letter dated September 26, 

2013, as supplemented by letters dated 

March 28, 2014, and August 28, 2014. 

Otherwise, there are no other 

environmental documents associated 

with this review. These documents are 

available for public inspection as 

indicated above. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day 

of February, 2015. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Meena K. Khanna, 

Chief, Plant Licensing IV–2 and 

Decommissioning Transition Branch, 

Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, 

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 2015–04288 Filed 2–27–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket No. 50–247; NRC–2015–0038] 

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., 

Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit 2 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: License amendment application; 

opportunity to comment, request a 

hearing, and petition for leave to 

intervene. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) is considering 

issuance of an amendment to Facility 

Operating License No. DPR–26, issued 

to Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., for 

operation of the Indian Point Nuclear 

Generating, Unit 2. The proposed 

amendment would allow a revision to 

the acceptance criteria for the 

Surveillance Requirement 3.1.4.2 for 

Control Rod G–3. During the last two 

performances of this Surveillance on 

September 18, 2014, and December 11, 

2014, Control Rod G–3 misalignment 

occurred with Shutdown Bank B group 

movement as displayed by the 

Individual Rod Position Indication and 

Plant Instrument Computer System. The 

proposed change is to defer subsequent 

testing of the Control Rod G–3 until 

repaired during the next refuel outage 

(March 2016) or forced outage long 

enough to repair the Control Rod. 

DATES: Submit comments by April 1, 

2015. Requests for a hearing or petition 

for leave to intervene must be filed by 

May 1, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

by any of the following methods (unless 

this document describes a different 

method for submitting comments on a 

specific subject): 

• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov and search 

for Docket ID NRC–2015–0038. Address 

questions about NRC dockets to Carol 

Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463; 

email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For 

technical questions, contact the 

individual listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 

document. 

• Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, 

Office of Administration, Mail Stop: 

OWFN–12–H08, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, 

DC 20555–0001. 

For additional direction on obtaining 

information and submitting comments, 

see ‘‘Obtaining Information and 

Submitting Comments’’ in the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 

this document. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Douglas V. Pickett, Office of Nuclear 

Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, 

DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415– 

1364, email: Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Obtaining Information and 

Submitting Comments 

A. Obtaining Information 

Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2015– 

0038 when contacting the NRC about 

the availability of information for this 

action. You may obtain publiclyavailable information related to this 

action by any of the following methods: 

• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov and search 

for Docket ID NRC–2015–0038. 

• NRC’s Agencywide Documents 

Access and Management System 

(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the 

ADAMS Public Documents collection at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/

adams.html. To begin the search, select 

‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then 

select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS 

Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, 

please contact the NRC’s Public 

Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 

1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by 

email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The 

Proposed License Amendment 

Regarding a Change to Technical 

Specification 3.1.4, ‘‘Reactivity Control 

Systems’’, is available in ADAMS under 

Accession No. ML15044A471. 

• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and 

purchase copies of public documents at 

the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One 

White Flint North, 11555 Rockville 

Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. 

B. Submitting Comments 

Please include Docket ID NRC–2015– 

0038 in the subject line of your 

comment submission, in order to ensure 

that the NRC is able to make your 

comment submission available to the 

public in this docket. 

The NRC cautions you not to include 

identifying or contact information that 

you do not want to be publicly 

disclosed in your comment submission. 

The NRC posts all comment 

submissions at http://

www.regulations.gov as well as entering 

the comment submissions into ADAMS. 

The NRC does not routinely edit 

comment submissions to remove 

identifying or contact information. 

If you are requesting or aggregating 

comments from other persons for 

submission to the NRC, then you should 

inform those persons not to include 

identifying or contact information that 

they do not want to be publicly 

disclosed in their comment submission. 

Your request should state that the NRC 

does not routinely edit comment 

submissions to remove such information 

before making the comment 

submissions available to the public or 

entering the comment submissions into 

ADAMS. 

I. Introduction 

The NRC is considering issuance of an 

amendment to Facility Operating 

License No. DPR–26, issued to Entergy 

Nuclear Operations, Inc., for operation 

of the Indian Point Nuclear Generating, 

Unit 2, located in Westchester County, 

New York. 

The proposed amendment would 

allow a revision to the acceptance 

criteria for Surveillance Requirement 

3.1.4.2 for Control Rod G–3. During the 

last two performances of this 

Surveillance on September 18, 2014, 

and December 11, 2014, Control Rod G– 

3 misalignment occurred with 

Shutdown Bank B group movement as 

displayed by the Individual Rod 

Position Indication and Plant 

Instrument Computer System. The 

proposed change is to defer subsequent 

testing of the Control Rod G–3 until 

repaired during the next refuel outage 

(March 2016) or forced outage long 

enough to repair the Control Rod. 

Before any issuance of the proposed 

license amendment, the NRC will need 

to make the findings required by the 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Notices 11237 

Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended 

(the Act), and NRC’s regulations. 

The NRC has made a proposed 

determination that the license 

amendment request involves no 

significant hazards consideration. Under 

the NRC’s regulations in § 50.92 of Title 

10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 

(10 CFR), this means that operation of 

the facility in accordance with the 

proposed amendment would not (1) 

involve a significant increase in the 

probability or consequences of an 

accident previously evaluated; or (2) 

create the possibility of a new or 

different kind of accident from any 

accident previously evaluated; or (3) 

involve a significant reduction in a 

margin of safety. As required by 10 CFR 

50.91(a), the licensee has provided its 

analysis of the issue of no significant 

hazards consideration, which is 

presented below: 

1. Does the proposed License amendment 

involve a significant increase in the 

probability or consequences of an accident 

previously evaluated? 

Response: No. 

The proposed change revises the 

requirement to perform SR 3.1.4.2 testing on 

Control Rod G–3 until the next refuel outage 

or forced outage of sufficient duration. 

Performing a technical specification 

surveillance test is not an accident initiator 

and does not increase the probability of an 

accident occurring. Since the control rod 

remains operable, the proposed change does 

not affect or create any accident initiators or 

precursors. The proposed revision to the test 

frequency is based on the ability of the 

control rod to continue to be able to perform 

its design function. The safety analyses 

assume control rod full insertion be [by] deenergizing the CRDM coils and not the ability 

to move a full length control rod by its drive 

mechanism. The last rod drop test verified 

this ability so there is no increase in the 

consequences of an accident. 

Therefore the proposed change does not 

involve a significant increase in the 

probability or consequences of an accident 

previously evaluated. 

2. Does the proposed License amendment 

create the possibility of a new or different 

kind of accident from any accident 

previously evaluated? 

Response: No. 

The proposed change revises the 

requirement to perform SR 3.1.4.2 testing on 

Control Rod G–3 by changing the frequency 

of the test. The proposed change does not 

involve installation of new equipment or 

modification of existing equipment, so that 

no new equipment failure modes are 

introduced. Also, the proposed change in test 

frequency does not result in a change to the 

way that the equipment or facility is operated 

so that no new accident initiators are created. 

Therefore the proposed change does not 

create the possibility of a new or different 

kind of accident from any accident 

previously evaluated. 

3. Does the proposed License amendment 

involve a significant reduction in a margin of 

safety? 

Response: No. 

The conduct of performance tests on 

safety-related plant equipment is a means of 

assuring that the equipment is capable of 

performing its intended safety function and 

therefore maintaining the margin of safety 

established in the safety analysis for the 

facility. The proposed change revises the 

requirement to perform SR 3.1.4.2 testing on 

Control Rod G–3 by changing the frequency 

of the test. The proposed change is based [on] 

the fact that there have been no problems 

with past tests of the Control Rod G–3 

indicating the [that] there are no problems 

with binding that could prevent the rod from 

inserting and a 12 hour surveillance on rod 

position that would indicate any changes in 

position. There are no indications that the 

trip function would not work assuring the 

reduction in margin of safety is not 

significant. 

Therefore, the proposed changes do not 

involve a significant reduction in a margin of 

safety. 

The NRC staff has reviewed the 

licensee’s analysis and, based on this 

review, it appears that the three 

standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are 

satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff 

proposes to determine that the license 

amendment request involves a No 

Significant Hazards Consideration. 

The NRC is seeking public comments 

on this proposed determination that the 

license amendment request involves no 

significant hazards consideration. Any 

comments received within 30 days after 

the date of publication of this notice 

will be considered in making any final 

determination. 

Normally, the Commission will not 

issue the amendment until the 

expiration of 60 days after the date of 

publication of this notice. The 

Commission may issue the license 

amendment before expiration of the 60- 

day notice period if the Commission 

concludes the amendment involves no 

significant hazards consideration. In 

addition, the Commission may issue the 

amendment prior to the expiration of 

the 30-day comment period should 

circumstances change during the 30-day 

comment period such that failure to act 

in a timely way would result, for 

example, in derating or shutdown of the 

facility. Should the Commission take 

action prior to the expiration of either 

the comment period or the notice 

period, it will publish in the Federal 

Register a notice of issuance. Should the 

Commission make a final No Significant 

Hazards Consideration Determination, 

any hearing will take place after 

issuance. The Commission expects that 

the need to take this action will occur 

very infrequently. 

II. Opportunity To Request a Hearing 

and Petition for Leave To Intervene 

Within 60 days after the date of 

publication of this Federal Register 

notice, any person whose interest may 

be affected by this proceeding and who 

desires to participate as a party in the 

proceeding must file a written request 

for hearing or a petition for leave to 

intervene specifying the contentions 

which the person seeks to have litigated 

in the hearing with respect to the 

license amendment request. Requests 

for hearing and petitions for leave to 

intervene shall be filed in accordance 

with the NRC’s ‘‘Agency Rules of 

Practice and Procedure’’ in 10 CFR part 

2. Interested person(s) should consult a 

current copy of 10 CFR 2.309, which is 

available at the NRC’s PDR. The NRC’s 

regulations are accessible electronically 

from the NRC Library on the NRC’s Web 

site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/

doc-collections/cfr/. 

As required by 10 CFR 2.309, a 

request for hearing or petition for leave 

to intervene must set forth with 

particularity the interest of the 

petitioner in the proceeding and how 

that interest may be affected by the 

results of the proceeding. The hearing 

request or petition must specifically 

explain the reasons why intervention 

should be permitted, with particular 

reference to the following general 

requirements: (1) The name, address, 

and telephone number of the requestor 

or petitioner; (2) the nature of the 

requestor’s/petitioner’s right under the 

Act to be made a party to the 

proceeding; (3) the nature and extent of 

the requestor’s/petitioner’s property, 

financial, or other interest in the 

proceeding; and (4) the possible effect of 

any decision or order which may be 

entered in the proceeding on the 

requestor’s/petitioner’s interest. The 

hearing request or petition must also 

include the specific contentions that the 

requestor/petitioner seeks to have 

litigated at the proceeding. 

For each contention, the requestor/

petitioner must provide a specific 

statement of the issue of law or fact to 

be raised or controverted, as well as a 

brief explanation of the basis for the 

contention. Additionally, the requestor/ 

petitioner must demonstrate that the 

issue raised by each contention is 

within the scope of the proceeding and 

is material to the findings that the NRC 

must make to support the granting of a 

license amendment in response to the 

application. The hearing request or 

petition must also include a concise 

statement of the alleged facts or expert 

opinion that support the contention and 

on which the requestor/petitioner 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
11238 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Notices 

intends to rely at the hearing, together 

with references to those specific sources 

and documents. The hearing request or 

petition must provide sufficient 

information to show that a genuine 

dispute exists with the applicant on a 

material issue of law or fact, including 

references to specific portions of the 

application for amendment that the 

petitioner disputes and the supporting 

reasons for each dispute. If the 

requestor/petitioner believes that the 

application for amendment fails to 

contain information on a relevant matter 

as required by law, the requestor/

petitioner must identify each failure and 

the supporting reasons for the 

requestor’s/petitioner’s belief. Each 

contention must be one which, if 

proven, would entitle the requestor/

petitioner to relief. A requestor/

petitioner who does not satisfy these 

requirements for at least one contention 

will not be permitted to participate as a 

party. 

Those permitted to intervene become 

parties to the proceeding, subject to any 

limitations in the order granting leave to 

intervene, and have the opportunity to 

participate fully in the conduct of the 

hearing with respect to resolution of 

that person’s admitted contentions, 

including the opportunity to present 

evidence and to submit a crossexamination plan for cross-examination 

of witnesses, consistent with NRC 

regulations, policies, and procedures. 

The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 

will set the time and place for any 

prehearing conferences and evidentiary 

hearings, and the appropriate notices 

will be provided. 

Hearing requests or petitions for leave 

to intervene must be filed no later than 

60 days from the date of publication of 

this notice. Requests for hearing, 

petitions for leave to intervene, and 

motions for leave to file new or 

amended contentions that are filed after 

the 60-day deadline will not be 

entertained absent a determination by 

the presiding officer that the filing 

demonstrates good cause by satisfying 

the three factors in 10 CFR 

2.309(c)(1)(i)–(iii). 

If a hearing is requested, the 

Commission will make a final 

determination on the issue of no 

significant hazards consideration. The 

final determination will serve to decide 

when the hearing is held. If the final 

determination is that the amendment 

request involves no significant hazards 

consideration, the Commission may 

issue the amendment and make it 

immediately effective, notwithstanding 

the request for a hearing. Any hearing 

held would take place after issuance of 

the amendment. If the final 

determination is that the amendment 

request involves a significant hazards 

consideration, then any hearing held 

would take place before the issuance of 

any amendment unless the Commission 

finds an imminent danger to the health 

or safety of the public, in which case it 

will issue an appropriate order or rule 

under 10 CFR part 2. 

III. Electronic Submissions (E-Filing) 

All documents filed in NRC 

adjudicatory proceedings, including a 

request for hearing, a petition for leave 

to intervene, any motion or other 

document filed in the proceeding prior 

to the submission of a request for 

hearing or petition to intervene, and 

documents filed by interested 

governmental entities participating 

under 10 CFR 2.315(c), must be filed in 

accordance with the NRC’s E-Filing rule 

(72 FR 49139; August 28, 2007). The EFiling process requires participants to 

submit and serve all adjudicatory 

documents over the internet, or in some 

cases to mail copies on electronic 

storage media. Participants may not 

submit paper copies of their filings 

unless they seek an exemption in 

accordance with the procedures 

described below. 

To comply with the procedural 

requirements of E-Filing, at least ten 10 

days prior to the filing deadline, the 

participant should contact the Office of 

the Secretary by email at 

hearing.docket@nrc.gov, or by telephone 

at 301–415–1677, to request (1) a digital 

identification (ID) certificate, which 

allows the participant (or its counsel or 

representative) to digitally sign 

documents and access the E-Submittal 

server for any proceeding in which it is 

participating; and (2) advise the 

Secretary that the participant will be 

submitting a request or petition for 

hearing (even in instances in which the 

participant, or its counsel or 

representative, already holds an NRCissued digital ID certificate). Based upon 

this information, the Secretary will 

establish an electronic docket for the 

hearing in this proceeding if the 

Secretary has not already established an 

electronic docket. 

Information about applying for a 

digital ID certificate is available on the 

NRC’s public Web site at http://

www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/

getting-started.html. System 

requirements for accessing the ESubmittal server are detailed in the 

NRC’s ‘‘Guidance for Electronic 

Submission,’’ which is available on the 

agency’s public Web site at http://

www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html. Participants may 

attempt to use other software not listed 

on the Web site, but should note that the 

NRC’s E-Filing system does not support 

unlisted software, and the NRC Meta 

System Help Desk will not be able to 

offer assistance in using unlisted 

software. 

If a participant is electronically 

submitting a document to the NRC in 

accordance with the E-Filing rule, the 

participant must file the document 

using the NRC’s online, Web-based 

submission form. In order to serve 

documents through the Electronic 

Information Exchange System, users 

will be required to install a Web 

browser plug-in from the NRC’s Web 

site. Further information on the Webbased submission form, including the 

installation of the Web browser plug-in, 

is available on the NRC’s public Web 

site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html. 

Once a participant has obtained a 

digital ID certificate and a docket has 

been created, the participant can then 

submit a request for hearing or petition 

for leave to intervene. Submissions 

should be in Portable Document Format 

(PDF) in accordance with NRC guidance 

available on the NRC’s public Web site 

at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html. A filing is considered 

complete at the time the documents are 

submitted through the NRC’s E-Filing 

system. To be timely, an electronic 

filing must be submitted to the E-Filing 

system no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern 

Time on the due date. Upon receipt of 

a transmission, the E-Filing system 

time-stamps the document and sends 

the submitter an email notice 

confirming receipt of the document. The 

E-Filing system also distributes an email 

notice that provides access to the 

document to the NRC’s Office of the 

General Counsel and any others who 

have advised the Office of the Secretary 

that they wish to participate in the 

proceeding, so that the filer need not 

serve the documents on those 

participants separately. Therefore, 

applicants and other participants (or 

their counsel or representative) must 

apply for and receive a digital ID 

certificate before a hearing request/

petition to intervene is filed so that they 

can obtain access to the document via 

the E-Filing system. 

A person filing electronically using 

the NRC’s adjudicatory E-Filing system 

may seek assistance by contacting the 

NRC Meta System Help Desk through 

the ‘‘Contact Us’’ link located on the 

NRC’s public Web site at http://

www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html, by email to 

MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a tollfree call at 1–866–672–7640. The NRC 

Meta System Help Desk is available 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Notices 11239 

between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern 

Time, Monday through Friday, 

excluding government holidays. 

Participants who believe that they 

have a good cause for not submitting 

documents electronically must file an 

exemption request, in accordance with 

10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper 

filing requesting authorization to 

continue to submit documents in paper 

format. Such filings must be submitted 

by: (1) First class mail addressed to the 

Office of the Secretary of the 

Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 

0001, Attention: Rulemaking and 

Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, 

express mail, or expedited delivery 

service to the Office of the Secretary, 

Sixteenth Floor, One White Flint North, 

11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 

Maryland 20852, Attention: Rulemaking 

and Adjudications Staff. Participants 

filing a document in this manner are 

responsible for serving the document on 

all other participants. Filing is 

considered complete by first-class mail 

as of the time of deposit in the mail, or 

by courier, express mail, or expedited 

delivery service upon depositing the 

document with the provider of the 

service. A presiding officer, having 

granted an exemption request from 

using E-Filing, may require a participant 

or party to use E-Filing if the presiding 

officer subsequently determines that the 

reason for granting the exemption from 

use of E-Filing no longer exists. 

Documents submitted in adjudicatory 

proceedings will appear in the NRC’s 

electronic hearing docket which is 

available to the public at http://

ehd1.nrc.gov/ehd/, unless excluded 

pursuant to an order of the Commission, 

or the presiding officer. Participants are 

requested not to include personal 

privacy information, such as social 

security numbers, home addresses, or 

home phone numbers in their filings, 

unless an NRC regulation or other law 

requires submission of such 

information. However, a request to 

intervene will require including 

information on local residence in order 

to demonstrate a proximity assertion of 

interest in the proceeding. With respect 

to copyrighted works, except for limited 

excerpts that serve the purpose of the 

adjudicatory filings and would 

constitute a Fair Use application, 

participants are requested not to include 

copyrighted materials in their 

submission. 

For further details with respect to this 

action, see the application for license 

amendment dated February 12, 2015 

(ADAMS Accession No. ML15044A471). 

Attorney for licensee: Jeanne Cho, 

Assistant General Counsel, Entergy 

Nuclear Operations, Inc., 440 Hamiliton 

Avenue, White Plains, NY 10601. 

NRC Branch Chief: Benjamin Beasley. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day 

of February 2015. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Douglas V. Pickett, 

Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing 

Branch I–1, Division of Operating Reactor 

Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 2015–04292 Filed 2–27–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

Advisory Committee on Reactor 

Safeguards; Notice of Meeting 

In accordance with the purposes of 

Sections 29 and 182b of the Atomic 

Energy Act (42 U.S.C. 2039, 2232b), the 

Advisory Committee on Reactor 

Safeguards (ACRS) will hold a meeting 

on March 5–7, 2015, 11545 Rockville 

Pike, Rockville, Maryland. 

Thursday, March 5, 2015, Conference 

Room T2–B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, 

Rockville, Maryland 

8:30 a.m.–8:35 a.m.: Opening 

Remarks by the ACRS Chairman 

(Open)—The ACRS Chairman will make 

opening remarks regarding the conduct 

of the meeting. 

8:35 a.m.–9:45 a.m.: Preparation for 

Meeting with the Commission (Open)— 

The Committee will discuss topics in 

preparation for the meeting with the 

Commission. 

10:00 a.m.–11:30 p.m.: Meeting with 

the Commission (Open)—The ACRS 

will meet with the Commission. 

12:30 p.m.–2:30 p.m.: Industry 

Priorization and Scheduling (Open)— 

The Committee will hear presentations 

by and hold discussions with 

representatives of the staff regarding the 

review of draft SECY Paper on possible 

options for implementing risk-informed 

scheduling as described in COMGEA– 

12–0001/COMWDM–12–0002, 

‘‘Proposed Initiative to Improve Nuclear 

Safety and Regulatory Efficiency.’’ 

2:45 p.m.–5:15 p.m.: Sequoyah Units 

1 and 2 License Renewal Application 

(Open)—The Committee will hear 

presentations by and hold discussions 

with representatives of the staff and 

TVA regarding the safety evaluation 

associated with the license renewal 

application for Sequoyah, Units 1 and 2. 

5:15 p.m.–6:00 p.m.: Preparation of 

ACRS Reports (Open)—The Committee 

will discuss proposed ACRS reports on 

matters discussed during this meeting. 

Friday, March 6, 2015, Conference 

Room T2–B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, 

Rockville, Maryland 

8:30 a.m.–10:00 a.m.: Future ACRS 

Activities/Report of the Planning and 

Procedures Subcommittee (Open/

Closed)—The Committee will discuss 

the recommendations of the Planning 

and Procedures Subcommittee regarding 

items proposed for consideration by the 

Full Committee during future ACRS 

Meetings, and matters related to the 

conduct of ACRS business, including 

anticipated workload and member 

assignments. [Note: A portion of this 

meeting may be closed pursuant to 5 

U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) and (6) to discuss 

organizational and personnel matters 

that relate solely to internal personnel 

rules and practices of ACRS, and 

information the release of which would 

constitute a clearly unwarranted 

invasion of personal privacy.] 

10:00 a.m.–10:15 a.m.: Reconciliation 

of ACRS Comments and 

Recommendations (Open)—The 

Committee will discuss the responses 

from the NRC Executive Director for 

Operations to comments and 

recommendations included in recent 

ACRS reports and letters. 

10:30 a.m.–6:00 p.m.: Preparation of 

ACRS Reports (Open)—The Committee 

will continue its discussion of proposed 

ACRS reports on matters discussed 

during this meeting. 

Saturday, March 7, 2015, Conference 

Room T2–B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, 

Rockville, Maryland 

8:30 a.m.–11:30 a.m.: Preparation of 

ACRS Reports (Open)—The Committee 

will continue its discussion of proposed 

ACRS reports. 

11:30 a.m.–12:00 p.m.: Miscellaneous 

(Open)—The Committee will continue 

its discussion related to the conduct of 

Committee activities and specific issues 

that were not completed during 

previous meetings. 

Procedures for the conduct of and 

participation in ACRS meetings were 

published in the Federal Register on 

October 13, 2014 (79 FR 59307–59308). 

In accordance with those procedures, 

oral or written views may be presented 

by members of the public, including 

representatives of the nuclear industry. 

Persons desiring to make oral statements 

should notify Quynh Nguyen, Cognizant 

ACRS Staff (Telephone: 301–415–5844, 

Email: Quynh.Nguyen@nrc.gov), five 

days before the meeting, if possible, so 

that appropriate arrangements can be 

made to allow necessary time during the 

meeting for such statements. In view of 

the possibility that the schedule for 

ACRS meetings may be adjusted by the 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES