alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
. _, 

Mr. Boria Jfagelin Jr. 

Crypto A.G. 

Weinbergatruae 10 

Zug, Switzerland 

Dear :Bos 

REF ID:A62460 

9 June 1955 

'.Plaaae let me thank you ~ar ;your very nice and. informative letter ot 2 June. 

By this time you will perhaps have learned from your tathe:r ot 1JI¥ relapse 

and ~turn to the hospital. I ha.ve been told- hovevc.a.·, by tbe :boator that I 

could return hone thi• comi~ Fl.~iday and vill take mch pleasure in doing so. 

l'obody knova wey I had a relapse and there 11 still an e.wtul lot to be lea.med 

a.bout heart disease. Thia tact my Doctor adlo1tted to ne toda.Y· I will, hol.-ever, 

be ever 90 caref'Ul and hope :not to :tw.ve a recurrence ot a rel&pee. 

ID four letter ;you reter to a letter tram Peru and. ...,- t.ba.t you are inoloa:lng 

& aow thereof. Untortunato.4r, your secretary failed to inclose it. I will be 

glad to have it whenever you can aend it. 

l ~ nQt qUite m.k.e out whether ;you are '1&1ti~ tor me to aend you acme 

wo;rd P to ,hipping instructlowi tor oiir Oil machine but lt ao, i auggeat YoU 

wait no lOJ:Jger, but IQ ahead 1n accordlu:lce with wl'Btever 1ustruct1ona you had 

or s•t from. the Sigrlal Purohaaing Agent in he.nktu.rt. 

I never heard o~ the f'l.m ''Linaal Cypher Co. u and I almost teel like 

quoting what a Gilbert mid Sulliw.n p1'q conta1l18 t 

111 am. tho master ot the college 

What I don't knCJW' ain't knowledge." 

In other wordc ~ tira the name or identity ot which is .new tom and which 

1• 1n .:the oeypto manutaoturi»g 'buai:neea can* t be mu.ch. However, I vill. attempt 

to tind out vb&t t can. Thia sounds to me like a tJ.1'-b;y-night firm in England. 

aomewhe:re .. 

:ta deep~ appreciative ot your sending a the t...-o nev heads tor~ 

razor becauee I was going to write to you and aak you spec1f'lcall;y to biq 

them ~or me. I •hall &lo"8.1t their receipt vith interest. In the mea.ntim 

I owe you approxim.tely $15 tor the one nev ruo1" you sent.-, which I f'or .. warde4 u a gif't to a triend.. Up0n receipt ot inf'orma.tion telling me how much 

theae tvo additional head.a cost you, I Will make out a check and aend it to you. 

With very best greetings, I am, 

Sincereq, 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-17-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

.,. 

: 

=t
```

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

            WINTHROP RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATES I, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                            FORM 10-QSB JUNE 30, 2004

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winthrop Residential Associates
I, A Limited Partnership, (the "Partnership"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.

Date: August 12, 2004                                    /s/ Michael L. Ashner
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Michael L. Ashner
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 12, 2004                                    /s/ Thomas C. Staples
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Thomas C. Staples
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

                                    16 of 17
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000779733
<NAME> ORGANOGENESIS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,052
<SECURITIES>                                    12,789
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,012
<PP&E>                                          16,944
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,339
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,710
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,471
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           305
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,934
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,710
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,997
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,028
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,031)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,031)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.48)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE>
                                            Exhibit 11

                         Statement Re:  Computation of Earnings per Share
<CAPTION>
                                                                            For The Three Months
                                                                               Ended March 31
                                                                            1997            1996
<S>                                                                  <C>             <C>
PRIMARY:

Average Shares Outstanding                                                22,050,000      20,992,000

Net effect of the assumed exercise
of stock options - based on the
treasury stock method                                                        345,000         129,000
                                                                        ------------    ------------
Total                                                                     22,395,000      21,121,000
                                                                        ============    ============
Net Income                                                               $14,471,000     $12,648,000

Per Share Amount                                                               $0.65           $0.60
                                                                        ============    ============

FULLY DILUTED:

Average Shares Outstanding                                                22,050,000      20,992,000

Net effect of the assumed exercise
of stock options - based on the
treasury stock method                                                        365,000         148,000
                                                                        ------------    ------------
Total                                                                     22,415,000      21,140,000
                                                                        ============    ============
Net Income                                                               $14,471,000     $12,648,000

Per Share Amount                                                               $0.65           $0.60
                                                                        ============    ============


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 12

- 00404

- CR

Javon Donte DUKES

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CR4694

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s June 5, 2012, order is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED April 24, 2013.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Form of Supply Agreement



 Exhibit 10.ii.a 
 

 
 SUPPLY AGREEMENT 
 FEED GRADE PHOSPHATES 
 INDIA 
  

					
	DATE:	    	  
	  	
		
	SELLER:	    	MOSAIC CROP NUTRITION, LLC, d.b.a.
		    	MOSAIC FEED INGREDIENTS
		    	8813 HWY 41 SOUTH
		    	RIVERVIEW, FL 33578

  

					
	BUYER:	    	CARGILL INDIA
		    	  
	  	
		    	  
	  	
		    	  
	  	
		
	PRODUCT:	    	FEED GRADE PHOSPHATES
		
	SPECIFICATIONS:	    	TYPICAL MOSAIC SPECIFICATIONS
		
	MARKET:	    	INDIA
		
	PERIOD:	    	1 JUNE 2008 THROUGH 31 MAY 2009
		
	PRICING:	    	TO BE NEGOTIATED AT TIME OF PURCHASE
		
	QUANTITY:	    	APPROXIMATELY 1500 METRIC TONS – NO MINIMUM PURCHASE REQUIRED
		
	DELIVERY:	    	TO BE NEGOTIATED AT TIME OF PURCHASE
		
	PAYMENT:	    	30 DAYS
		
	TERMS:	    	MOSAIC TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO APPLY.

  

									
	MOSAIC CROP NUTRITION, LLC	 		  	CARGILL INDIA
					
	By:	 	  
	 		  	By:	  	  

	Name:	 	  
	 		  	Name:	  	  

	Its:	 	  
	 		  	Its:
REF ID:A275459 

~RE1 

, 6 January 1944. 

Suggested communication to G.C. & C.S.: 

TRAVIS from CORDERMAN 

(Attention Lt. Col. Thompson) 

Does Mr. Pa rkin, War Office liaison officer, have any information 

about a Japanese vessel which visited ~arious_points in the Pacific 

theatre some months ago for the probable purpose of distributing 

new code books or cipher instructions to Japanese army or naval 

installations'? 

It is my best recolloectin that Parkin, Jap. army War Office 

representaiive told me at B.P. that either he or the Jap naval section 

(or their respective ministries) had traced a single Japanese vessel 

moving from one army point to another, following which some important 

code change had taken place. This may be a type of "post hoc ergo 

propter hoc" inference---or may have some value. 

~w)PJ~~ C.S.Barasch 

.SECRET 

Declassifi ~~!n_:!_ agproved for release by NSA_ on 05-1_9-2014 __ p_ursuant to E .0. 1352\}--
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-7530 Directorate Identifier: 2014-NM-257-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

SB Inspection 1.0 $ 85.00 0 $ 85.00 8 $ 680.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 680

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
REF ID:A41S-B~ 

·~. 

l)r, Jlovzt.rd f.- ~tree 

Aaaiatant V1c• Pl'dicl&Qt 

Ellllll•erina Research A•aoclat~ 

DtYielozi ot JlemiDgton :Rand., ID.e, 

5011.Bth Street, South 

Al"Uuti'ton1 Viz'Slnla 

Dear Di-. Ens$trOll: 

· 1'. Jotnt 11eettaa ot ell three pai1el.$ ara~zea. under the 

National Sec\11'1ty Agenc1 Sc1entiftc Aclvieory Board l• 'being 

pltume4 t~ eo-a Mq 1954. · 

21'he tint «q vtU be devotee\ to accompi1eh1na a41dntatraU.ve 

4eta118 an4 taa111ar1&1ng tbole psmtl .,..ra raot prev10Ull7 

acquainted vttb the ASeucY vttb· the b!shU&ht• or our orpnlsatlcn 

at14 •tart. fte •ecott4 day 1e to be devoted to a 4etatle4 preaenta.• tlon and. .U.cuseton ot •cme ot OlU' tec.b,111cal prol>l_. and to plans 

tQ't'· tuture panel actlv1t1es. 

. You vt.U not be req\d,re4 to attend the Metlog on 20 May, but 

it 18 etnceMlJ bope4 that fOil will be able to be preaent for' the 

21 May Metlns· . 

CCJ AG 

c/s .. S/ASST (Mr. Friedman) 

S:lncvel.71. 

WILLIAM F. FBXE2»WI 

Executive Secret&lT 

BSA Scientific A4V180%7 loard 

M/R: Announces joint meeting of three panels oi" the NSASAB and 

invites panel'member's attendance •. 

I.T.McDonald, S/AS!fr/6o493/9Apr 54 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on ·1.2-01-2014 pursuantto E .0. 13S2a
# AMERICANAIRLINES

April 9, 2010

Dorothy Beard Docket Branch Department of Transportation 1200 New JerseyAve., S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: U.S.-JapanAlliance Case, DOT-OST-2010-0059

DearMs. Beard:

AmericanAirlines, Inc. hereby submits letters in support of its application for antitrust immunitywith Japan Airlines from Federal and State elected offi als, mayors, airports, chambers of commerce, and union leaders.

Respectfully submitted,

Carl B. Nelson, Jr. Associate General Counsel AmericanAirlines, Inc. 1101 17th Street, N.W., Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 496-5647 carl.nelson@aa.com

cc: Service listCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing document byemail on the following persons:

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com scott.mcclain@delta.com sametta.c.barnett@delta.com kquinn@pillsburywinthrop.com bkeiner@crowell.com mrosia@crowell.com bruce.rabinovitz@wilmerhale.com jeffrey.manley@united.com bob.kneisley@wnco.com robert.land@jetblue.com msinick@ssd.com cdonley@ssd.com gbleopard@fedex.com dvaughan@kelleydrye.com kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com lhalloway@crowell.com efaberman@wileyrein.com mroller@rollerbauer.com howard.kass@usairways.com benjamin.slocum@usairways.com sophy.chen@hklaw.com david.heffernan@wilmerhale.com

April 9T 2010 jhill@dlalaw.com bill@mietuslaw.com mgoldman@sgbdc.com rsilverberg@sgbdc.com dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com mcmillin@woa.com eskraft@jamhoff.com dpdean@jamhoff.com dkirstein@yklaw.com jyoung@yklaw.com donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil jim.ballough@faa.gov byerlyjr@state.gov recohn@hhlaw.com simpson@zsrlaw.com pmurphy@lopmurphy.com lachter@starpower.net anita.mosner@hklaw.com rpommer@atlasair.com gmurphy@crowell.com russell.bailey@alpa.org
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2)(C); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

MAR 2 1999

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

 

LARRY HARRIS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v. No. 98-3296

J. W. BOOKER,

Respondent-Appellee.

(D.C. No. 98-CV-3312-RDR)

(D. Kan.)

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

 

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, BALDOCK, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.**

 

Petitioner Larry Harris, an inmate at the federal penitentiary in Leavenworth,

Kansas, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas

corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In 1988, a jury convicted Harris in the

Southern District of Ohio for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute in excess of

five hundred grams of cocaine and for attempting to possess with intent to distribute in
2

excess of five hundred grams of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. The Sixth

Circuit affirmed Harris’ convictions on direct appeal, United States v. Harris, Nos.

88-4172 & 4173, 1989 WL 140497 (6th Cir. 1989) (unpublished), and subsequently

affirmed the district court’s denial of Harris’ motion for collateral relief under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255, Harris v. United States, No. 92-4097, 1993 WL 169057 (6th Cir. 1993)

(unpublished). The Sixth Circuit, acting pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244, later forbade

Harris from filing a second or successive petition for collateral relief under § 2255.

In his petition before the District of Kansas, Harris claimed that the remedy under

§ 2255 was inadequate and thus he was entitled to proceed under § 2241 with his claim

that the sentencing court improperly applied the sentencing guidelines. The district court

rejected Harris’ argument and dismissed his petition. We have carefully reviewed the

record on appeal and Petitioner’s brief. We conclude that the district court properly

dismissed the petition and affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in the district

court’s order of dismissal.

AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court,

Bobby R. Baldock

Circuit Judge
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 40887 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

–

Appellee,

v. IVAN MANUEL TABAREZ

- RODRIGUEZ , also known as Manuel Tabarez

Rodriguez , Defendant

– Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:17

- CR

- 80

- 1
Before SOUTHWICK, WILLETT, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ivan Tabarez

Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011 )

. Counsel also moves for leave to file a supplemental

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 20 , 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-40887 Document: 00514520298 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2018No . 17

- 40887

2 Anders brief , which we GRANT

. Tabarez

- Rodriguez has filed a response , which includes a request that new counsel be appointed

. We have reviewed counsel ’s brief , supplemental brief, and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Tabarez

- Rodriguez ’ s response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review

. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED

. See 5 TH C IR
. R. 42.2

. Tabarez

Rodriguez’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED

. Case: 17-40887 Document: 00514520298 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/20/2018
# CE2004084EN.01061701.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/617 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/617

---

(2004/C 84 E/0691)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0533/04

by Bill Newton Dunn (ELDR) to the Commission

(24 February 2004)

Subject:   Horse passport

Subject:

How many of the Member States have put the Directive into their national law?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(23 March 2004)

(23 March 2004)

The principles of identification of equidae are laid down in Council Directive 90/426/EEC of 26 June 1990 on animal health conditions governing the movement and import from third countries of equidae (1). Minimum requirements for the identification of registered equidae are laid down in Council Directive 90/427/EEC of 26 June 1990 on the zootechnical and genealogical conditions governing intra-Community trade in equidae (1). Both Directives have been transposed by all Member States into national law.

1

1

Based on Directive 90/427/EEC, the Commission adopted Decision 93/623/EEC of 20 October 1993 establishing the identification document (passport) accompanying registered equidae (2).

2

In accordance with Article 4 of Directive 90/42 6/EEC and motivated by animal welfare and public health concerns, the Commission adopted Decision 2000/68/EC of 22 December 1999 (3) amending Commission Decision 93/623/EEC and establishing the identification of equidae for breeding and production.

3

According to Article 4 of Commission Decision 2000/68/EC, Member States shall ensure that as from 1 July 2000 at the latest, registered equidae and equidae for breeding and production are accompanied during their movement by the identification document as referred to above. This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Decisions 93/623/EEC and 2000/68/EC do not oblige Member States to notify the legal provisions they have implemented to comply with the provisions of these Decisions. So far, the Commission has not received any complaint in connection with non-implementation of the mentioned Decisions in the Member States.

---

(1)  OJ L 224, 18.8.1990.

1

(2)  OJ L 298, 3.12.1993.

2

(3)  OJ L 23, 28.1.2000.

3

---
.. 

Dr. ~ S.S.t.h 

Uidvertiey ct Michlp:1 

Willow Ihm Jteue.reh C.Uter 

?J•ii..nt 1, MichJ.san 

Dear D:r. Im.1th' 

QQen.l. c..ns.x. be..e uked •to tell :you bov pleraaed be 

ta vttb. your accept.an~ or bi• 1.aTitatica to .mberah1p on 

the 'r.loeommunteati~ Panel or th9 •tiaral t!lffu:ricy Agency 

kieiltif'ic ActvUc:ey Jocu'd. I a~ tbe.t the origi.Ml 

letter wnt utra,r. 

Aa JOU !&)' lmaw1 the pt'Oeelit!lg ftqUlrtd tar lftl\tUJg 

uceu to llatioml kcurity ~ attera require• 111Ch 

tu.. ~ 10Ul' cue, the t>J"OC•••i:rlg YiU be WtiaWd a.a 

to0n u we receive t.be ~Utred torm hOll J'OU• 

At tha u., let• tlwik you tor 1Q\Jr e.e~«vtanc~ or 

the inrltatiori, •1~ S.t u SJ)dic.tive ol JQur ~•t in 

Cd nti.mate or the illportanee ~ the problem11 'With vhl.eh 

ft -..t conwnd ill the ltrtm't•t crt the •tioml defense. 

ac: 

llacftrct~,. 

_, AG _ 

c/s 

S/PSST {Mr Friedm.n) M/R: Acknmrledging Dr. Smith's acceptance 

to membership on T&lecomnunicationzs Panel 

ot NSASA:B. 

I. T. McOONAID/6o493/3 JUne 54/can 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 08-05-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a - -- --- -- ~ -