alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 27, 2009 

s0518 

Order 

 

May 27, 2009 

137327 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137327 

 COA: 278372 

Kalamazoo CC: 06-001566-FC 

MARCUS DEON OGDEN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 31, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
REF ID:A67490 

Pro.r. Richard v. Andree 

D9partm.ent. ot Mat..l')em'ltiCa and Astr<>no111.1 

Uni ver::d. t.1 ot Oklaho.'ll& 

lon•n• Oklah0?1.& 

Dear Prol. Ani'Nles 

... 

• 

Seri.al.' '"2. ~ \ 

-;... ' "a~.~--::. 

1'hanlc )'OU TC'¥' 11\lOb tor JOUl" letter of 6 Januaq atd 

&180 for tha ,reprint.a sent tor Jq collect.Lon. I vilb JOU 

had auto&raph:>d tbom - t.'1& t alvqa addr.t to theii- interoat. 

In v1ev or 11q ballet that aovemmont 8G19¥1ce, at 

least. in t.he oraan11at1on ot which 1 - a llOJ.11ber, can 

coJYapete 1d:Lh & um:rera1 t7 prolessorr1h1p in l'elard to the 

two de81derata rou ment1on1 I a aend1nc )'OQ. horawi\b thlJ 

tonaa to whicb. I .reterred 1rl rq pre'V1.oue letter. It 1011. 

..Ul coapl•te am return th• di:re~U, ta mel I will be 

flad to take u.p the matt.or Mith our porsonnel divlaion. 

l Incl•• 

i. s.r. s1. 

I. II> )98 1d. th suppltments 

(in d..tpl.1oate). 

J.,. Al"SA. Fvr.:t ,36. 

jxJBb 

CCI AQ 

C/s 

~Ji~~~ ~~· t:>'~-----\ 

Sinoerely,. 

WILLIAM P. J'R.I!llWf 

Consllltmt 

M/Rs Pro!. Andree is a possible candidate tor EID.ployment. 

Re!. Serial 32.38 dtd 24 Dec $2. 

W.F .Friedman/CON$/,60493/2l Jan S3 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-30-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 

- - -- ------- -----~-~ ... ~
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1853 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1853

 To limit the availability of funding for contributions to the United 
Nations if the arms embargo on Iran pursuant to United Nations Security 
              Council Resolutions 1747 and 1929 is lifted.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 23, 2015

   Mr. Cruz introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To limit the availability of funding for contributions to the United 
Nations if the arms embargo on Iran pursuant to United Nations Security 
              Council Resolutions 1747 and 1929 is lifted.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Block Arms to Iran Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON FUNDING FOR UNITED NATIONS IF ARMS EMBARGO ON 
              IRAN IS LIFTED.

    Of the amounts appropriated or otherwise made available for the 
Department of State for ``Contributions to International 
Organizations'' and available for contributions to the United Nations, 
20 percent may not be obligated or expended for such purpose if the 
arms embargo on Iran pursuant to paragraphs 5 and 6 of United Nations 
Security Council Resolution 1747 (2007) and paragraph 8 of United 
Nations Security Council Resolution 1929 (2010) is lifted, reduced, or 
otherwise eased, notwithstanding paragraph 13 of United Nations 
Security Council Resolution 1747 (2007) and paragraph 37 of United 
Nations Security Council 1929 (2010).
                                 <all>
```
~~/--n~;~!~ 

/{,~~~~~! 

~ .. "':·,~:·,. 

-,; .., - ,,.1.' ..;.~ 1'.J;-,. "'."" ... 

•,. .
#### The State ex rel. *W.*G. Taylor Company vs. Elliott, Circuit Judge.

*October 30*

November *16, 1900.*

Mandamus: *Vacation of order: Change of venue.*

*Mandamus*to compel a circuit judge to vacate an order changing the venue of an action is denied, complete and direct relief being obtainable, if relator is entitled to it, upon *certiorari.*

Motion for an alternative writ of *mandamus.*

Denied.

*F. H.*Bemvngton, for the relator.

Dodge, J.

Application for alternative writ of *mandamus*■commanding the circuit judge of Milwaukee county to set aside and vacate an order entered by that court changing the venue of a certain action. The relief sought is properly obtainable, if at all, on *certiorari.*Existence of an *164order made contrary to law is the only claimed infringement of relator’s rights, and the only relief he seeks is the extinguishment of that order. The judgment upon *certio-rari*is either affirmance or reversal of such order; and the latter, if relator is entitled to it, is complete and direct relief. Counsel has apparently been misled as to his remedy by the fact that a command to vacate certain orders was. included in the *mandamus*issued in *State ex rel. Fourth Nat. Bank v.*Johnson, 105 Wis. 164. But in that proceeding the-principal relief sought and granted was a mandate to enter certain specified orders, and the vacation of others was merely ancillary and to enable the commanded order to take-effect. For these reasons the motion for an alternative writ, of *mandamus*is denied.

*By the*Court.— So ordered.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 22, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 22, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18D0164. STATE OF GEORGIA v. JANET MILLER.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 17CR386
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1693 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1693

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility for 
reimbursement for emergency medical treatment to certain veterans that 
were unable to receive care from the Department of Veterans Affairs in 
    the 24-month period preceding the furnishing of such emergency 
                   treatment, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 25, 2015

  Ms. Hirono introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility for 
reimbursement for emergency medical treatment to certain veterans that 
were unable to receive care from the Department of Veterans Affairs in 
    the 24-month period preceding the furnishing of such emergency 
                   treatment, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF EMERGENCY TREATMENT REIMBURSEMENT FOR CERTAIN 
              VETERANS.

    Section 1725(b)(2)(B) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(i)'' after ``(B)'';
            (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting ``; 
        or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(ii) the veteran was unable to receive care under this 
        chapter within such 24-month period because of a waiting period 
        imposed by the Department with respect to a new patient 
        examination of such veteran.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Steven T. Tamburo, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RiggsNational Corporation (the “registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and proceduresto be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any changes in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s quarter ended June 30, 2004,that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the
 

 

  registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: August 6, 2004 /s/ STEVEN T. TAMBURO       Steven T. TamburoChief Financial Officer
} 

--

~11'. l'ft~I 

Jr;-. M~•:t act~-.~~._ !"".!Ctcrl~ 'lt r:mr 18'\Gr ot6~~ 

~ 111.U ~ 1'!J'l 111r1tat1onal ~ ..... 111 ....... .f'..tbte. 

, 

JV.Ra Dr. Dakar vaa invited to attend a aesoiCM ot" tho taA.SAB'• 

8Pt0id stu.dT aroue ~ 31-'Uo""USt thru u sept, (sw • .3742). 

:or. ~·• repl.y (cltd 6 AU& Sl) •tat.es ha 1dll. not be iible to 

atte:?d tllDC$pt poaall>l.7 the l•'t. rJJq (ll s,pt,) due to priw ca::d.taeritl. -

It'RtlfcDOMld/Aest to S/JSST/ll Au; $~ 

------i@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-19 2014 pursuant to E .0 .· 13520
Salt River Project

P. 0. Box 52025Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2025

Dear Ms. Barr:

Thank you for your interest in Arizona’s plan to address regional haze in protected national parks and

wilderness areas as required under the Clean Air Act (CAA). We are responding to your letter dated July20, 2012, requesting an extension ofthe public comment period and additional hearings.We agree to extend the deadline for public comment and conduct two additional public hearings to

provide further opportunity for review and comment on the Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART)

determinations for three power plants in Arizona (Apache Generating Station, Cholla Power Plant andCoronado Generating Station). We have extended the public comment period by two weeks, for a total

of 60 days ending on September 18, 2012, but are unable to provide the 90 days that you requested. Weare on an expedited schedule to review and respond to all public comments and to prepare a fmaldetermination on these three BART determinations by the deadline of November 15, 2012. This

deadline is mandated by a consent decree entered by the Federal District Court for the District of

Columbia, over Arizona’s objection. We did request an extension ofthis deadline from the other partiesto that consent decree, but were unsuccessful.On August 14, 2012, we will hold an additional hearing in Holbrook, Arizona at Holbrook High School,

George Gardner Performing Arts Center, 455 N. 8th Ave.) from 6-8 PM. Note this is a change from theoriginal location at Northland Pioneer College. On August 15, 2012, we will hold a hearing in Benson,

Arizona, at Cochise College (Rooms 113 and 115) from 6-8 PM. These two hearings are in addition to

the public hearing held in Phoenix on July 31, 2012.

We look forward to receiving your comments on the proposed rulemaking and working with you and

other interested parties to address regional haze affecting national parks and wilderness areas. If you

have further questions, please contact Colleen McKaughan, at 520-498-0118.

Sincerely,

42 J Debora ordan

Director, Air Division

Printed on Recycled Paper
Opinion issued October 16, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-00420-CV

———————————

SHEANA ELIZABETH BELL, Appellants

V.

CASEY LYNN MORRISON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 309th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2010-48727

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Sheana Elizabeth Bell, has neither established indigence for 

purposes of appellate costs, nor paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for 

preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a). After 
2

being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately 

respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See id. 42.3(b), 

43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Massengale.
1 • 

DIGEST OF THE DIRECTOR'S 

STAFF CONFERENCE 

3 DEC. 1954 

TO: Chiefs of Offices and staff Divisions 

FROM: Chief of Staff 

l. CHIEF OF STAFF 

While the AG is responsible for the routing of all dispatches 

and correspondence, it is impossible for him to know all the business 

of your offices; however, you can assist materially by exercising 

positive action on all dispatches and correspondence. During the past 

month, some correspondence failed to clear the Agency because an action 

office was not designated by the AG or else an incorrect action 

addressee had been assigned. It is your responsibility, upon receipt 

of dispatches and/or correspondence to: 

a. Determine whether action is necessary and then proceed 

to take positive, expeditious action. 

b. Coo:-dinate with other elements of the Agency where necessary. 

c. Advise the AG immediately when a change of action is 

necessip-y or when an incorrect action has been assigned. 

You and your people must be aware of the above at all times. 

2. DIRECTOR 

"I want to elaborate on the remarks made by the Chief of Sta.ff 

in connection with correspondence. You take too long to answer things 

which you0should answer. You have the greatest difficulty in making up 

your minds. I get a pretty fair idea from the AG's routing slips on 

how long our correspondence has been kicking around. If an incorrect 

addressee has been assigned to something, get it back into the··correct 

channel by coordinating your action with the AG. Delays are costly; 

it all boils down to one point: do what you are told to do when you 

are told to do it." 

3. AG 

Reported a change in courier service between NBS, AHS, and the' 

Pentagon. One additional trip to AHS has been provided for in the new 

schedule. NSA Regulation 102-1, dated 6 December 195~, has been 

distributed for guidance of all concerned. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-28-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

SECRET 
- .. ,. 

4. TRAINING 

Announced that information on the Agency full scholarship 

program for 1955 will be forwarded to all Staff and Division Chief's 

this week. 

5. GENERAL COUNSEL 

Announced that a memorandum is being prepared explaining the 

court's ruling on Section 798 of Title 18 of' the U.S. Code pursuant to 

a motion by the defense in the Petersen case to dismiss the indictment 

under that section; the judge's ruling was in.favor of the Government. 

This law deals with the handling of COMINT material. 

2 

/ ~~- <7a-J' ~~,u Asst. the C/S 

SECRET
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 38 (Thursday, February 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 10473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03909]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL15-47-000]

NextEra Desert Center Blythe, LLC v. California Independent 
System Operator Corporation; Notice of Complaint

    Take notice that on February 18, 2015, pursuant to section 206 of 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206 and section 206 of the Federal 
Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824(e), NextEra Desert Center Blythe, LLC 
(Complainant) filed a formal complaint against the California 
Independent System Operator Corporation (Respondent) alleging that, the 
Respondent failed to allocate Merchant Congestion Revenue Rights to the 
Complainant for its investment in transmission upgrades as required by 
the Respondent's Market Redesign and Technology Upgrade Tariff.
    The Complainant certifies that copies of the complaint were served 
on the contacts for the Respondent and Southern California Edison 
Company as listed on the Commission's list of Corporate Officials and 
on the California Public Utilities Commission.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's 
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before 
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and 
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
``eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables subscribers to 
receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed 
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
[email protected], or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on March 10, 2015.

    Dated: February 19, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-03909 Filed 2-25-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)





I, Harold E. Antonson, as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of US 1 Industries, Inc., certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of US 1 Industries, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.  The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.





Dated this 16th day of May 2011./s/ Harold E. AntonsonHarold E. AntonsonChief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to US 1 Industries, Inc. and will be retained by US 1 Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Lattice Incorporated (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul
      Burgess, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)     
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
           The information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
      operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Lattice Incorporated and will be retained by Lattice Incorporated and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





Date: November
                19, 2007
            /s/
                Paul BurgessName: 
                Paul BurgessTitle: 
                Chief Executive Officer