alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                        74103000
<SECURITIES>                                  19436000
<RECEIVABLES>                                153997000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   6444000
<INVENTORY>                                  149641000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             412651000
<PP&E>                                       126338000
<DEPRECIATION>                                46362000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               557629000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         68192000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                      65033000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   420137000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 557629000
<SALES>                                      260273000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             260273000
<CGS>                                         84829000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                111547000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              788000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               69496000
<INCOME-TAX>                                  26012000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           43484000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  43484000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
        

</TABLE>
BORIS -GELINREF ID :A226328··'rylrnd.8, Orsa. 

Friclay :\usust. 23rd, 1963 

Dear Bill: 

I should have written this letter a couple of d~VE 

ago, so that it would h~ve been waitin; for you, 

at your Arrival in Lausnnne. I do hope ho~ever 

thnt it will still rench you th~re. 

Kany t:.anks for your lon3 letter of Au3.14., and 

for our 1·1 st ch~ t over the rhone, be fore you le ft 

Stockholm. We were harpy to lE~rn thnt you a~d 

Elizebeth had both enjoyed the stay in 

anr< we trust that Visby has also proved to Be.an 

in•erest'.ng exrerience. 

Ana now, how about LausJnne?· 

I will not write ~nything :ibout "business'', as 

you will get ~ome first hand informn~!on from 

3ture, when you arrive in Zu~. An~ in about one 

months ' time, I hope that we shall meet a3ain in 

rhe we'1ther here h~s been var1nble the whole time, 

but still mainly en tl11:/rler,1sont sir!e. We h.'1ve 

made a co·~rle of trips by c·1r, one of which t0ok 

us more than 100 miles north from here, and 

~ ' ~ ' 

. - . 
to the ~rir qrmc:i\AJZ2:l6u2~89ut __:;so9eet elev·i tion, f1'on; where we lrncl :::i 1r;onc'.2rful view. -.re 

also saw sowe beautiful reindeer, close to the 

ro~d we were travellin~ on. 

I 

Jn a weeks time we shall be under way to 3undsvik, where I sholl s~uy until the 17th of Sept. 

and Annie until the 23rd. I will 30 to 3u3 by ·:·· 

tr'lin.':lell Jill, the sun is s~1inin·:;, just~ now, 

an~ we shall h~ve to 30 out un~ pick lin3onberri2s, for tl1e jDm, which · .. 1e sh:.111 t·.ike alone; to 

· Swi t\3erl·:i nc1: 

rle ~1 se 

Anr1,excu9e me: I n2rirly for3ot to tk1nl·: you for 

the roo8t.er: Do you k ow thnt tlils bird is the 

in ~inland ~ 

symbol/for the int.imnte -clace it( to indic'.!te? 

As we have tl:11s pl.3ce in our home in ,:us well 

marked, I am 3oin5 to get it a perwanent 

':le senu you both our very best wishes, and hope 

to hear from you some time before we leRve 

Sweqen. 1.'lith affection.'.Jte l'E'.:':'1rds, 

3incsrely
REF.ID:A66301 

llr'· Doml4 A. Qlarl.ea 

uaiatt&.nt Secretary or Deteneo (R/D) 

'!he Pe~:in 

5tca" *· Que.rJ.eai 

~ next metUi6 or t;JO •ti<m:!..l Security AgeLl:!y 

k1e:rUI'ie 

~ 

Adv~.v Board 111plarm<ld1'or ~ aG4 

/ :zo .. 21 ~u l.9 ..54. 1 ~n~.1.oG at l.000, at t~ 

Raval. Security station,, J8oi Jlebra.BkA. 4vm.we1 •· v. ~-

'!'ow" )llia.rtld,pa t1on a the 6ollbera ticm. or tM .bud 

~ tho entire naston would be IGJt help.tu.l,. but I 

CIA read1l~ ~tc;.nJ. tbe.t yw. ~cot be Ulo to &t'tend. 

tho ~ Oil b&:itb ~~ 

98 APri.4a tor tM mcetag v1ll proba1ilJ' 'be sent to 

rm later. At th1a u. .. 1'11Qvavetr1 l \tOUl4 ~cl.ate 

10Ul' e4v 1$.ing • ~ ~ it.et. J'CU vould. l.1lra placed on 

th& ll6C'x:da. 

cc: AG 

c/s 

S/ ASST (Mr. Friedman) 

.5 

'WlI.Litll£ 1 • 1'RlEI»~All 

Bbcutive Scrcta:rJ 

a\. SCientiti.C Jd.vieorj lJoo.rd. 

M/R: Invitation to 20-21. .April 1954 NSASAB :rooetill8· 

M.M.FelerskilS/ASST/6o493/lO Feb 54 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-24-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION 

590 MADISON AV.DNUE 

OFFICE OF 

VICE l'RESID.I:NT 

;! 

, 

Professor 5. s. irns 

Mathama.tics partment 

University Illino1$ 

Urbana, ls 

Dear 

NEW YORK 22 N Y 

April 21, 1Q53 

JWlative to your memorandum of March 24 and the various enclosures whi.ch have reached me from the Bureau. of Standards, l have 

l"en•w•d the material with interest and am heartily in accord Wlth the 

program proposed for Uus summer. My inter•Bt in &aeinq more work 

doM in this field of math~matics was heightened by a visit to England, 

which accounts for my delay in replying ta your inquiry 

1n the PraceedJ.nqs of the Manchester Meeti119 almost two years 

aqo, there are articles by M H A Newman and 1 C P. Miller on subjects of thiz same qeneral nature which are quite challenging. I hope that 

we. can interest more of our beat mathematicians~ who have an interest in 

these fieild.s, to extend their hor1J.Ons by considerinq the use of electronic 

comptltvs in connection with their mathematieal formulations and even 

their ma.thematieal experiments in 3earchill9' for new results. 

I feel quite strongly that work in any field of mathematics, combined with an understanding and appreciation of what can be done with 

electronic comput&rS: cf today, will lead to new methods and evfin to new 

orgal\1.u.tions of the device itself for the purpose of securing results more 

direcUy or With !ewer steps 

As I told you at our last meetinq> we should be very qlad to coopell'ate in your course of lectures on vari-ou3 macbin& aspects of int~rest 

to 1~ gTotip As aoon as .co.n~Jident, I would lilJe to b.ille a llttle clearer 

idta. of j~t what you would UU as tt;) c~ver ln our :p"rtioo ot these lectures 

and their tindllf, so that we ean ~-suitable axranq,ements att& be fully 

prepared to pre!!ent our material in the clearest poss1ble form Tenta.tiV'elJ 

we are planninq to have o• m onr Los A.n<Jeles Applied Science repre;.entatives tiff the lectures 

Declassified and approved for 

elease by NSA on 02-12-2014 

bursuantto E .0. 13526 

J"CMeP 1m 

ec Mr William F
The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, United states District Judge 1

for the Western District of Arkansas.

___________

No. 95-4036

___________

Connecticut Indemnity Company, * 

 *

Plaintiff-Appellee, *

 *

v. *

 *

Harris Transport Company, *

 *

Defendant-Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

Mitchell Hogan; Ralph C. Hogan, * Western District of Arkansas.

 *

Defendants, * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

Vanliner Insurance Company, *

 *

Defendant-Appellant, *

 *

Dorothy Ella (Dot) Thomas, *

Personal Representative estate *

of Kenneth Thomas, *

 *

Defendant-Appellee. *

_____________

Submitted: February 20, 1997

Filed: March 14, 1997

_____________

Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Harris Transport Company and Vanliner Insurance Company appeal the

district court's grant of summary judgment to Connecticut Indemnity

1

Company in this declaratory judgment action. After de
-2-

novo review, we believe the district court's decision was correct.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1720 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1720

   To require the Secretary of the Treasury to redesign $10 Federal 
 reserve notes so as to include a likeness of Harriet Tubman, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 8, 2015

Mrs. Shaheen (for herself, Ms. Mikulski, and Mr. Cardin) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of the Treasury to redesign $10 Federal 
 reserve notes so as to include a likeness of Harriet Tubman, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Harriet Tubman Currency Tribute Act 
of 2015''.

SEC. 2. LIKENESS OF HARRIET TUBMAN REQUIRED TO BE INCLUDED ON THE FACE 
              OF $10 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES.

    The eighth undesignated paragraph of section 16 of the Federal 
Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 418) is amended by adding at the end the 
following: ``The Secretary of the Treasury shall ensure that the face 
of all $10 Federal reserve notes printed after December 31, 2020, shall 
bear the likeness of Harriet Tubman.''.
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 06, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 06, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16D0040. JOY WELCKER v. GEORGIA BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF PSYCHOLOGISTS.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 14CV62104
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects a notice that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on February 18, 2015 Volume 80, Number 32, pages 8661. The time and date should read as follows:                    

Time And Date: 11:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m., March 19, 2015 (Closed).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        M. Chris Langub, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway NE., Mailstop F46, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, Telephone: (770) 488-3585,                         *EEO6@cdc.gov.*

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2015-04469 Filed 3-3-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-5170

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

RICHARD EDWARD CABEY,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Thomas David 

Schroeder, District Judge. (1:09-cr-00413-TDS-1)

Submitted: June 30, 2011 Decided: July 13, 2011

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan Leonard, LAW OFFICE OF JONATHAN LEONARD, Winston-Salem, 

North Carolina, for Appellant. Ripley Rand, United States 

Attorney, Anand P. Ramaswamy, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Richard Edward Cabey appeals from his conviction for 

possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 

U.S.C. §§ 922(g), 924(e) (2006). Cabey pleaded guilty but 

reserved his right to appeal the district court’s denial of his 

motion to suppress evidence seized from his vehicle after an 

investigatory stop. Finding no error, we affirm.

This court reviews factual findings underlying the 

district court’s denial of a motion to suppress for clear error 

and legal conclusions de novo. United States v. Blake, 571 F.3d 

331, 338 (4th Cir. 2009), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 1104 (2010). 

A factual finding is clearly erroneous if this court “on the 

entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction 

that a mistake has been committed.” United States v. Harvey, 

532 F.3d 326, 337 (4th Cir. 2008) (internal quotation marks 

omitted). However, “if the district court’s account of the 

evidence is plausible in light of the record viewed in its 

entirety,” the court will not reverse the district court’s 

finding even if it would have “decided the fact differently.” 

United States v. Stevenson, 396 F.3d 538, 542 (4th Cir. 2005) 

(internal quotation marks and alteration omitted). In other 

words, when two views of the evidence are permissible, “the 

district court’s choice between them cannot be clearly 
3

erroneous.” Id. (internal quotation marks and alteration 

omitted). 

We have reviewed the transcript of the hearing on the

motion to suppress, the district court’s memorandum opinion and 

order denying the motion, and the parties’ briefs and joint 

appendix. Having reviewed these materials, we conclude that the 

district court did not err in denying the motion to suppress. 

We therefore affirm the judgment. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
REF ID:A66106 

General Orders lumber 7lJ aendment ot 

NJ i/ASST 

It 1a requested that ?WA General Orders llumber 71, dated 24 Septelliber 1953, be 

amended to include Captain 3. s. Roltvick, s/NJST; and Mr. A. :a. Clark, 'f,/D, u 

members ot the Executive G~ for !card attai.ra. 

WILLI.AM F.. FRIElJWI 

Specie.l. Assietant 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

·-·-
# CE2004088EN.01052001.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/520 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/520

---

(2004/C 88 E/0533)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0715/04

by José García-Margallo y Marfil (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(10 March 2004)

Subject:   Polish VAT increase for citrus fruit

Subject:

The Polish Parliament recently adopted a bill on taxing goods and services. The bill includes a significant increase in taxes on consumer goods, particularly citrus fruits and other imported products. The bill provides for a VAT rate of 22 % on citrus fruit, whereas all other Polish-produced fruit and vegetables will be taxed at 7 %.

Community legislation lays down that all food products qualify for the lowest rate of VAT, but that it is up to each Member State to decide the rate it wishes to apply to these products.

However, the Polish bill severely distorts competition, by favouring certain products, most of them locally produced, to the detriment of others mostly produced in other EU countries, such as citrus and other imported fruit. The current situation, which directly affects Community citrus fruit growing already discriminates against citrus fruit by applying a 7 % rate, as against the 3 % applied to other substitute products; this is completely arbitrary, given the similarity of the cost of citrus fruit with these other, similar products, which are not affected by the measure.

What measures is the Commission going to take in view of this possible tax discrimination by Poland against imported citrus fruit coming from other Member States in favour of Polish domestic products of a similar nature, with a view to safeguarding the principles of freedom of competition within the internal market?

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

# ORIGINAL OP 23-0629
SHANNA SPRING MANYWOUNDS,

Petitioner,

v. 20TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, LAKE COUNTY, HONORABLE DEBORAH KIM CHRISTOPHER, PRESIDING JUDGE,

Respondent. 

# FILED NOV 2 4 2023
Ezovv. ,-.n ( CI.

. rt ORDER

On November 20, 2023,we granted Jonathan Whyte,party tothe underlying matter in the Twentieth Judicial District Court, Lake County, in its Cause No. DR-23-17, an extension oftime until November 30, 2023, to prepare, file, and serve a response tothepetition for writ ofsupervisory control. Whyte,representinghimself, filed a response onNovember 21, 2023. On November 24, 2023, attorney David W. Diacon filed a notice of appearance on Whyte's behalf. He has moved for leave to file an amended response. Havingreviewed Whyte'smotion and with good cause appearing, IT IS THERFORE ORDERED that Jonathan Carlton Whyte shall have up to and includingNovember 30, 2023, to prepare, file, and serve an amended response to the petition for writ ofsupervisory control. No further extensionsoftime will be granted. The Clerk is directed to provide immediate notice of this Order to counsel for Petitioner, all parties in the Twentieth Judicial District Court, Lake County, Cause No. DR-23-17, and the Honorable Deborah Kim Christopher, presiding. DATED this 24th day ofNovember, 2023. For the Court. 11/24/2023

Case Number: OP 23-0629
Specimen common stock certificate of Registrant



 Exhibit 4.1 
 



 







 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of
this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
  

									
	 TEN COM
	 	 –
	  	 as tenants in common
	  	UNIF GIFT (TRANS) MIN ACT                 
     Custodian                     
		 		  		  	(Cust)                        
    (Minor)   
	 TEN ENT
	 	 –
	  	 as tenants by the entireties
	  		  	
	 JT TEN
	 	 –
	  	 as joint tenants with right
	  	under Uniform Gifts (Transfer) to Minors
		 		  	 of survivorship and not as
	  	Act                        
                                     
		 		  	 tenants in common
	  	(State)                        


 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 

FOR VALUE RECEIVED,
                                         
                    hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto 
  

	
	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
	 IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
  

	 
	 
	 
	 

  
  

PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS OF ASSIGNEE 
  

	
	 
	
	 
	
	 
	
	
                             
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                 Shares of the stock represented by the within
Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                 Attorney to transfer the said Stock on the books of
the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.


 Dated
                     
  

	
	  

	 NOTICE: THE SIGNATURES TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT
ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.



 Signature(s) Guaranteed 

 

			
	 By
	 	  

	 THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH
MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
lroteasor Saunder• Ma.clane 

Univer11ty ot Chicaac> ~t ot Ma:themat1c• 

Chicago, Illinoi• 

Jlear' Prof'eaaor Jlaclene I 

Serials ; o ~ 0 

l • pl.ea.led v1th ~our acceptance ar the invitation to be a 

..uiber or the *tb.enati~• P~l flt the Jational security Agency 

lc1entU1c AdvilOl"Y Board. 

The mxt meetina at the Adviaor.v Doi.rd. 1teelt Will probably 

be held cm 20-21 April.. A"t that time it 1a expected. a report on 

tM ~l ..mbe%'llh1p will 1"t .-ubaitted. to tJla !OIU'd ~ther vitb 

ecit pro"ble• that can be reterred tar specUic panel action. 

t~Q.uent to thi• brd .. thig, the J&Del chainltn, vbo a.re 

..UO meilber• at~ !oard1 rill be able to eonter with 70u on 

attera ot panel orpntsation. ud ru.ture aet1v1t1ea. 

I vtah to thank J'OU tar ;your ~ acceptance at rq t.nv1ta• 

tioo, •inc• 1t 1• 1n41cat1ve ot 1tJUr 1ntereat 1n and 1our utU.te 

« t.be uwortance Cf the problellla V1ttl which,,. JllUlft contend ill 

the 11ltereat or the m.tional 4etena•. Mr. J'riedJmn 'tells a tbat 

be hl4 the pleuure or ta.Jld»s nth 701.1 a couple or yeara qo and. 

u loo~ tonrard., u a I, to eeebg JO\l vben you are next 1n 

Wuhington. 

cc: AG 

c/s 

s/ ASST (Mr. Friedman) 

RAll'.ft J. CAlllfl 

Ueute:aant General, tll Ar1T1¥ 

Dine tor 

M/R: Ack.no"wl.~nt of Prof. Maclane' s ltr dtd. 14. Feb 54. Prof'• 

Ma.clane accepts Gen. C&nine'l!I invitation -ror membership on the 

Ma.thenatiCB :Panel ot the NSASAB. 

M.M.Fel.!!rski/B/ABST/6o493/19 Feb 54 

J!\pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23 2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a