alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Statement oftheAir and Radiation Management Administration Department ofthe Environment for thePublic HearingRelating to Proposed Amendments to Regulation .06 Control ofVOC from Large Appliance Coating under COMAR26.11.19 Control ofVolatile Organic Compounds from Specific Processes held on August 4, 2010 Baltimore, MD My name is Husain Waheed. I am a Senior Regulatory and Compliance Engineer with the Regulation Development Division ofthe Air and Radiation Management Administration, Department ofthe Environment. This public hearing is being held pursuant to the requirements of40 CFR Section 51.102 and Sections 2-301 et.seq. ofthe Environment Article, Annotated Code ofMaryland. It is also being held in conformance with the State Administrative Procedures Actunderthe State Government Article, beginning at Section 10-101. Notice ofthis hearing appeared in the: Maryland Register onJuly 2, 2010; MDE's website onJune 22

- August 4, 2010; Baltimore Sun onJuly 2,2010; Saint Mary's Enterprise onJuly 2,2010; Cumberland Times-News on July 2, 2010; FrederickNews-Post onJuly 2,2010; Salisbury Daily Times on July 2, 2010; and the Washington Post onJuly 1,2010. Copies ofthese notices were submitted for the record. Copies ofthe proposed action and supporting documents were submitted for review to the State Clearinghouse and are also submitted at this time into the hearing record. Copies were also made available for public inspection atthe Air and Radiation Management Administration offices inBaltimore, Cumberland, and Salisbury, and at all local health departments or local air quality control offices. The purpose oftoday's hearing is to give the public an opportunityto comment on proposed amendments to Regulation .06 under COMAR 26.11.19. 

### Summary These amendments are necessary to incorporate the standards and requirements of Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) for large appliance coating operations and the economic impact analysis has been conducted in the development ofthe CTG.

1COMAR 26.11.19.06 is amended to set the VOC coating standard of2.3 pounds per gallon ofcoating applied (minus water) / 0.275 kilogram/liter ofcoating applied (minus water). Application ofcoatings on large appliances can only be conducted using one ofthe following methods: 1. Electrostatic application; 2. HVLP spray; 3. Flow coat; 4. Roller coat; 5. Dip coat including electrodeposition; 6. Brush coat; or 7. Other coating application method capable of achieving a transfer efficiency equivalent orbetter than that achieved by HVLP spraying. The requirements ofthe regulation can be met by complying with the standard for VOC content ofcoating and using one ofthe options for application methods or achieving an overall capture and control ofVOC emissions from the large appliance coating installation through the use ofcontrol equipment which achieves an overall VOC emissions reduction ofat least 90 percent. Maryland's State Implementation Plan (SIP) This regulation will be submitted to the EPA for approval as part ofthe SIP. Consideration ofComments The Department will consider all comments before making a decisionto adopt the proposed amendments.

2
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MARCH 5, 2012

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 11-13094

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00019-MCR-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

ROGER RAY PRICE,

 Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

_________________________

(March 5, 2012)

Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and WILSON, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:

Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Roger Ray Price in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Price’s conviction and sentence

are AFFIRMED.

2
• b 

P.rot.SJO~ s. •• 11.lJot 

Dep&rtant. ot Hathllratioe .. 709. rt. 11&11 

Pr1meton Urd:vwsit)" Princeton,, .. Je:r:aey 

Dem" ITotMBOI' lf1lb. 

REF ID: A67 7 62, 

• 

'ft\lllk 1'011 var.?' mob ~ 1'0Ur' llrt.ter or 22 ~ 19S2. and 

tor JOUI' "1.l.l.ln&nM• to MrV• on our ~ lolrd, dupt.te the 

burderi or other oblip.t.S.one ~ heav,r ~· on JOl1r U-. and 

tb9rQ'• 

CCI AG 

C/8 

Vice Dir 

CONS 

M/a1 Acknowledging Pro£. Wilks' letter ot 22 Dec 52 accepting the 

invitation to become a member ot the !1SA Scientific Adviaoey Board • 

• 

w. F .Friedman/60493/30 Dec 52 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-11-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
*Hon. Eugene E. Siler, Jr., United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by

designation UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

August 9, 2019

Nos. 18

- 2336 & 18

- 2426

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,

Cross Petitioner/Respondent

v.

800 RIVER ROAD OPERATING COMPANY, L.L.C., dba Woodcrest Health Care

Center,

Cross

- Petitioner/Respondent

(NLRB

- 1: 22

- CA

- 083628)

Present: CHAGARES, HARDIMAN and *SILER, Jr., Circuit Judges

1. Letter Motion by Petitioner to Amend Opinion.

Respectfully,

Clerk/pdb

_________________________________ORDER________________________________

The foregoing motion is hereby granted. Page thr ee of our opinion filed August 6, 2019

shall be amended to replace “ the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) or the “A ct ”). ”

W ith “ the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”) ”

.

By the Court,

s/ Michael A. Chagares

Circuit Judge

Dated: August 22, 2019

cc: A ll Cou nsel o f Record
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**In the Matter of**

**ROMA S. YOUNG**

**PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 173 DB 2014 (No. 5 RST 2015)** 

**Attorney Registration No. 29064** 

**(Delaware County)**

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 15 th**  **day of January, 2015, the Report and Recommendation of**  **Disciplinary Board Member dated January 6, 2015, is appr oved and it is ORDERED that**  **Roma S. Young, who has been on Administrative Suspensio n , has never been**  **suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications,**  **competency and learning in law required for admission t o practice in the**  **Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to act ive status as a member of the**  **Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation**  **and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petit ioner.**
17 l'ebrua:q 1955 

ml!;~ 

IJUIJ.BCT1 Pick-up 6od l>eliwq ot C-!51 'bt Air Attaebe, Stoekhol.a 

:Oi Lie\lte.-nt Colonel P" 3-. Jar1'0ld, tJS.Ar 

Chi.et, Al'O:tl-l.A! ~ra, USA1 

b hntagon, MAex 3 

l. Mr· Jori• c.w. llapl1n, owner of A.J. Crypt.ot.elmik bu 

Men a1ke4 to -.ko avail.e.blo to the U.S. Air Attache, Stockholm, 

om iuu ot cr.ypto .. •quii:aent. (o ... ;a) .. 

1. Xt 11Ul \Mr grMtl)r ap~ciated it ;you voul.4 aAviM the 

Air A~be in itockboim to coiitaet Hr .. lf:lbfl's1 A.». Or;yptotelad.k, 

lordeld"~chtavqen &?, Btoekholll 30, llveden, to recei~or the 

c .. 5& -.1. to tOl'Wl'd 1t w air tranaportation in. p&C addre1aed 

to the J')tr.ctor, •tioral &tcur1t,y lce'D.011 Washington* ' n. c., Attnt Mr. Williar. hied.man. 

S• for 7our Wormtiw, tbla -.cbirJe 11 mral,y beil'lg 

bar:roved tl"QlaA.». Cr)tptotokn1k, ud. dota not COll&titu\e all· 

or atJ¥ l*rl ot ~ prrchue ord.er or equtp:IO'n't from tbi• compaey-. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-29-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 1 2 , 2017

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 17 -00090- CR

DANNY QUOC NGUYEN, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 228th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1468348

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

In a single issue, appellant contends that his conviction for murder is void. He contends that the trial court that rendered judgment—the 228th District Court of Harris County—lacked jurisdiction because the grand jury that indicted appellant was impaneled by a different district court—the 179th District Court of Harris County.2

Both courts were Harris County district courts, and the indictment bears the file stamp of the Harris County District Clerk. Under these circumstances, the trial court had jurisdiction. See Saldivar v. State , No. 14

- 16 -00888-CR, 2017 WL 4697888, at *1–2 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 19, 2017, no pet. h.);
Matthews v. State , No. 14- 16 -00913-CR, 2017 WL 3271195, at *2 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] Aug. 1, 2017, pet. ref’ d) ; s ee also Aguillon v. State , No. 14- 17

- 00002-CR, 2017 WL 3045797 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] July 18, 2017, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
Appellant’s issue is overruled for the reasons stated in Saldivar and Matthews

. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justice s Christopher, Brown, and Wise

. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2( b).
2008 NAAQS Nonattainment Area Preliminary
2014 - 2016 Design ValueMeets 2008 NAAQS?2016
Exceedance Days2014 4th Highest Daily

Maximum2015 4th Highest Daily

Maximum2016 4th Highest Daily

Maximum2016 Critical
Value2017 Critical
Value Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA 70Yes 2 67 70 75 91 83 Atlanta, GA 75Yes13 73 77 75 78 76 Baltimore, MD 73Yes10 67 74 79 87 75 Baton Rouge, LA 72Yes 3 75 73 68 80 87 Calaveras County, CA 76 No 9 71 81 77 76 70 Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI 77 No 14 76 75 80 77 73 Chico (Butte County), CA 75Yes 7 74 75 77 79 76 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 72Yes 8 70 70 76 88 82 Cleveland-Akron-Lorain, OH 75Yes 6 75 74 76 79 78 Columbus, OH 71 Yes 3 70 71 72 87 85 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX 80 No 8 77 88 76 63 64 Denver-Boulder-Greeley-Ft. Collins-Loveland, CO 80 No 14 76 81 83 71 64 Dukes County, MA Inc 1 59 68 66101 94 Greater Connecticut, CT 75Yes 7 77 75 75 76 78 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX 79 No 12 68 95 74 65 59 Imperial County, CA 76 No 5 78 77 74 73 77 Jamestown, NY 68Yes 2 66 71 69 91 88 Kern County (Eastern Kern), CA 84 No 27 89 80 84 59 64 Lancaster, PA 69Yes 2 66 70 71 92 87 Los Angeles-San Bernardino Counties (West Mojave Desert)91 No 59 93 86 94 49 48 Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, CA 108No106102107117 19 4 Mariposa County, CA 75Yes 6 77 71 77 80 80 Morongo Band of Mission Indians, CA 97 No 51 98 97 97 33 34 Nevada County (Western part), CA 84 No 16 82 85 86 61 57 New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT 85 No 25 81 87 87 60 54 Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians, CA 77 No 7 77 79 77 72 72 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE 77 No 14 71 82 80 75 66 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ 77 No 9 80 77 74 71 77 Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley, PA 70Yes 6 68 70 73 90 85 Reading, PA 71 Yes 4 68 71 75 89 82 Riverside County (Coachella Valley), CA 87 No 25 89 86 87 53 55 Sacramento Metro, CA 84 No 32 82 80 92 66 56 San Diego County, CA 81 No 13 80 79 84 69 65 San Francisco Bay Area, CA 74Yes 8 76 74 72 78 82 San Joaquin Valley, CA 94 No 88 97 93 92 38 43 San Luis Obispo (Eastern San Luis Obispo), CA 73Yes 2 73 72 74 83 82 Seaford, DE 69Yes 2 67 70 70 91 88 Sheboygan County, WI 79 No 6 72 81 85 75 62 St. Louis-St. Charles-Farmington, MO-IL 72Yes12 72 70 75 86 83 Tuscan Buttes, CA 79 No 23 76 76 87 76 65 Upper Green River Basin Area, WY 63Yes 0 62 65 64 101 99 Ventura County, CA 77 No 4 81 74 77 73 77 Washington, DC-MD-VA 72Yes 8 71 73 72 84 83
RECONSIDERATION DOCKET

97-2039.

#### E. Canton Edn. Assn. v. McIntosh.

Stark App. No. 96CA0293. Reported at 85 Ohio St.3d 465, 709 N.E.2d 468. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Moyer, C. J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                       254269000
<SECURITIES>                                  14805000
<RECEIVABLES>                                254437000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   9741000
<INVENTORY>                                  248871000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             818062000
<PP&E>                                       306858000
<DEPRECIATION>                               121597000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1269806000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        190453000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      92270000
<OTHER-SE>                                   890097000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1269806000
<SALES>                                      230257000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             230257000
<CGS>                                         67291000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                160089000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              293000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               75638000
<INCOME-TAX>                                  25950000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           48427000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  48427000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27



</TABLE>
-\ 

I 

REF ID:A65985 

»-. John Cloud !!ctbcraan 

Vie• Preaident 

Interrat.ional a&eines• llLchlnee Corporation S90 111418on Ave.nue .., York 22, !faw York 

n.ar Mr. llol'heraon1 

l ui ntUl"nine hO!'OW1th ~ original receipt. 

"8A-0Cll/•t 

lld:'ials 1061 

1 ., .JUL 1951 

With cordial greet.inge and hopirlg to "" 70U eoon lft&1n, 

I am, 

1 tncl. 

liRe!pt. dtd 

l4 June 19;1 

PLEASE RETURN TO AFSA-OOT 

William F. Friedman/et/16 Jul 51 

AFSA-OOT, Ext 60240 

--

eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 

_4 .... -.... 15 .... -.-.2 .... 0 1._4....,...u-.r __ su ... a ... nt .... t.... o .-E .... o ......... 1 .... 35 .... 2 ... 6 ______ -~. 

:;:.:~ "I 

----------------------------- - ' 
REF ID:A65985 ..... 

Dates June 14, 1951 

Mt-. John c. KcFherson, Vice President tar Engineering 

Fran.t .International Bud.nesa Jit.ohinea Corp •• F.ndicott, N.Y. 

Toa Director, AFSA Jlail and File Room, {AFSA-OOT) 

Receipi# is hereby acknowledged of the tollow.lng item(a), torwa.rded. 

under AFSA Control Number • 

1 cow - '!he mathema.t.ical theo17 or related cipher alphabets, Section I. 

l copy - 1he mathematical theory~ related cipher alphabets, Section II. 

1 copy - Anal,ya1a or a m.echanioo-electrical 01'7Ptograph, 

Part I. 

1 copy - A.nalJ'ld,s ot a naechanioo-electrical crn>tograph, 

Part II. 

/////////lll////l/l///l//Nomnn FOUJJ/Js/////////////////// 

/•/ John C lroPheraon 

Slgnature ot Addressee ar tiii Agen~ 

Return thia receipt to s 

D1reator, .Arned Forces Se0Ul'it7 Agenc7 

Washington 251 D. c. 

AFSA Form No. 5 

1 Februal7 1950
##### 



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
      a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States;c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: April 29, 2008/s/ Guy AvidanGuy AvidanChief Financial Officer
 27
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2007-1263 

MARTIN GUBB, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v. 

P&M SERVICES, INC., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

 Marc Lorelli, Brooks Kushman P.C., of Southfield, Michigan, argued for plaintiffappellee. With him on the brief was Mark A. Cantor. 

 Mark S. Demorest, Demorest Law Firm, PPLC, of Birmingham, Michigan, argued 

for defendant-appellant. 

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan 

Senior Judge Julian Abele Cook, Jr. 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2007-1263 

MARTIN GUBB, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v. 

P&M SERVICES, INC., 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

Judgment 

ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

 

In CASE NO(S). 2:04-CV-72432. 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam: (MAYER, GAJARSA and MOORE, Circuit Judges): 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

DATED: _March 4, 2008____ / s / Jan Horbaly

 Jan Horbaly, Clerk
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OFCHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

 

I,Gregg Buckbinder, the Chief Financial and Operating Officer and principalfinancial officer of Millburn Ridgefield Corporation, the General Partner ofNestor Partners (the “Partnership”), certify that (i) the Annual Report of thePartnership on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Partnership.

 

 
| Date:  | March  30, 2006 |                                   |   |
|--------|-----------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |            |
|   | /s/             | Gregg  Buckbinder                      |   |
|   |            | Gregg  Buckbinder                      |
|   |            | Chief  Financial and Operating Officer |

 

----
The State of



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 21, 2014

N o . 04

- 14

- 00285

- CR

Jason Clay DOTSON

, Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR10439 Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The record in this appeal is complete except for a seventy

- page volume of the reporter’s record. On August 20, 2014, the reporter, Herminia Torres, filed a notification of late record, stating she has not filed the volume because appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee to prepare the rec ord and appellant is not entitled to the record without paying

the fee. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.6(b), 35.3(b).

We therefore order appellant to provide written proof to this court by September 2

, 2014 that either (1) the reporter’s fee h as been paid or arrangements satisfactory to the reporter have been made to pay the reporter’s fee or (2) appellant is entitled to the record without prepayment of the reporter’s fee. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3(b). If appellant fails to respond within

the ti me provided, appellant’s brief will be due September 22, 2014 , and the court will only consider those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record

for a decision. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of August, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Doc ID: 3701366
Doc ID: 3701366
Doc ID: 3701366
Doc ID: 3701366
Doc ID: 3701366
Doc ID: 3701366
Doc ID: 3701366
Doc ID: 3701366
Doc ID: 3701366
Doc ID: 3701366
Doc ID: 3701366
Doc ID: 3701366
Doc ID: 3701366
Doc ID: 3701366
Doc ID: 3701366
Doc ID: 3701366
Doc ID: 3701366
Doc ID: 3701366
Doc ID: 3701366
Doc ID: 3701366
Doc ID: 3701366
Doc ID: 3701366
.. 

.. REF ID:A2263209 

BORlS HAGELIN ~ug, Oct. 3.1961. 

Dear Bill: 

Just a few lines, to thank you for the kind reception of 

Sture! 

And also to give you an answer to your question re "Astarte". 

In my Swedish dictionary the goddess in question was described 

as the goddess of love, and th11.t orgiaistic rites were performed 

to her glo:ry in the temples. So I think it was a good choice. 

But apart from that: I needed a name wyich sounded well, of a 

female, and furthermore a nrune not registered for a Swedish 

yacht. Karl-Wilhelm, who masterminded the construction of the 

boctt, is as you know, a physician, and he was prepared to.1:take 

care af~eventual consequences. 

We were happy to hear that you liked the clock, and we hope 

that it will keep correct time as long as you wind it regularly. 

Ar fection.1.te 

old friends 

r-P.gards to Elizebeth and yourself from your 

Annie 

~ 

and 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 08-05-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a