alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

   We hereby consent to the use in the prospectus constituting part of this
Registration Statement on Form S-3 of our reports dated August 21, 1998 (except
as to Note 14, which is as of October 9, 1998) and June 21, 1999 (except as to
Note 13, which is as of July 29, 1999) relating to the financial statements of
CMC Industries, Inc., which appear in such prospectus. We also consent to the
reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such prospectus.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
___________________________
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Memphis, Tennessee
October 21, 1999
II 

Calendar No. 347 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1822 

[Report No. 114–203] 

To take certain Federal land located in Tuolumne County, California, into 

trust for the benefit of the Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 21, 2015 

Mrs. BOXER (for herself and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

JANUARY 12, 2016 

Reported by Mr. BARRASSO, with an amendment 

[Insert the part printed in italic] 

A BILL 

To take certain Federal land located in Tuolumne County, 

California, into trust for the benefit of the Tuolumne 

Band of Me-Wuk Indians, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LAND INTO TRUST. 

4 (a) FEDERAL LAND.—Subject to valid existing 

5 rights, all right, title, and interest (including improveVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:18 Jan 13, 2016 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1822.RS S1822

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1822 RS

1 ments and appurtenances) of the United States in and to 

2 the Federal land described in subsection (b) shall be held 

3 in trust by the United States for the benefit of the 

4 Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians for nongaming pur5 poses. 

6 (b) LAND DESCRIPTION.—The land taken into trust 

7 under subsection (a) is the approximately 80 acres of Fed8 eral land under the administrative jurisdiction of the 

9 United States Forest Service, located in Tuolumne Coun10 ty, California, and described as follows: 

11 (1) Southwest 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 of Section 

12 2, Township 1 North, Range 16 East. 

13 (2) Northeast 1/4 of Northwest 1/4 of Section 

14 11, Township 1 North, Range 16 East of the Mount 

15 Diablo Meridian. 

16 (c) GAMING.—Class II and class III gaming (as those 

17 terms are defined in section 4 of the Indian Gaming Regu18 latory Act (25 U.S.C. 2703)) shall not be permitted at 

19 any time on the land taken into trust under subsection 

20 (a). 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 347 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1822 

[Report No. 114–203] 

A BILL 

To take certain Federal land located in Tuolumne 

other purposes. the Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians, and for County, California, into trust for the benefit of 

JANUARY 12, 2016 

Reported with an amendment 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
 
                                                                 Exhibit 23.1
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
   As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our report in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed Registration
Statement File Nos. 333-16855, 333-16857, and 333-16859.
 
                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
 
Boston, Massachusetts
February 28, 1999
---- ----~----

REF ID:A65518 

lti-W; )- ~ \ ~ 

L. (Yl~ \'f 

Mr. J,. z. MUJ.ar 

Wltltern 

60 lfudet>n 

Union 

Ettreet 

'felae;raph ~ 

lw Tork 13, lev York 

:Deu' Mr• Millar I 

'!hu u w ~~ J'Oee1pt or 70UZ' ~tance or ~ invitation to Yi•it the 111.t1omJ. ~1t¥ Agency ror 

tbt 21 ~ Joint Panel meettaG. 

lt 1tJ1U will plan to att1V1' at )Sol lebruka Avenoo at. 

~5 oa 21 Ma:1"1 w v1ll have l<IMO?» at the p.tehowm to ...,. 701.1• 

I a!! 1ncioe1rig cqp1es of 7~ tr&vcl ordera &Ma 

tr.msportatlon :request tor tbi• trip in~ Vith 

)'OUI' 'Wiebes. A1llo htcloat3d tw rour eottnu11encn is an 

~ion aheet vith the req,utred torma 11<> tba.t 1'0\1 

~ 'f'eee1w ~tion tar JOUJ' aervicea u p:rcewt.1¥ u 

poftliltle upon their ccmpletion. 

!Qold.Jla forward to llMiJJg JOU, x.., 

·~l,y, 

Wn.tlAt.i P. JRiilM~ 

lidcuti ve Seerete.:r,y 

JIM. lcientitic MYUcn7 'loe.:rd 

M/R: AcknowJ..edsing Mr. Millar• s acceptance 

cc: AfJ to attend the Joint Panel Meetings 21 May. 

c/y; .Alnoi incloeinf> &ll necessary f'orms 'for completioi 

S/N3ST (Mr. Fried.nnn) ot vieit. 

Lt. I. T. McDonald/6o493/4 May 54/can 

roved for Release b ursuantto E .0. 1352
' REF ID:A71923 

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 

Estimated 

Contract per diem plus Expansion Salary overhead. Travel Totals Remarks 

s. s. Cairns) 

.. ) 

J. c. Koken ) 3 807 3 807 00 Agreed - 7/1 - 8/31 

D. W. Hall. l 600 240 00 400 2 240 00 Agreed - 7/1 - 8/31 

e Secretary 1 048 1 048 00 Agreed - 7/1 - 8/31 

c. Wexler l 500 225 00 200 l 925 00 Offered - 7/7 - 9/6 

T. Botts 1 500 225 00 400 2 125 00 Not yet offered, but essentially co:mmi. tted. 

J. A. Ward 2 25o 337 50 400 2 987 50 Offered - 6/15 - 9/15 

E. H. Hanson 1 5oo 225 00 400 2 125 00 Offered - 7/15 - 9/15 

G. A. Hedluni 2 400 36o 00 400 3 160 00 Not yet offered, but assenti.ally committed. 

w. Karush 600 90 00 400 1 090 00 Offered - 8/l - 8/31, approx. 

.e I. Kaplansky 500 15 00 515 00 Offered - 8/4 - 8/23 

A. A. Albert 200 30 00 230 00 Pending - List week in August. ,. 

22 312 50 

May 2, 1952 

'I 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 02-11-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

---- --- - ------ - -
RECONSIDERATION DOCKET

96-2258.

#### State ex rel. Druggan v. Indus. Comm.

In Mandamus. Reported at 85 Ohio St.3d 683, 710 N.E.2d 1133. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
First Amendment To Severance Agreement


 Exhibit 10.4 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT 
 This First Amendment (the “Amendment”) effective
as of September 19, 2008 to the Severance Agreement, dated as of April 6, 2007 (the “Agreement”), between Nobel Learning Communities, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (“Nobel Learning”), and Jeanne Marie Welsko
(Executive”). 
 Background 
 Executive is a member of Nobel Learning’s senior leadership team and is expected to be actively involved in executing Nobel Learning’s plans for continued growth and success. 
 In an effort to acknowledge Executive’s important role in this process and to provide Executive with a degree of income and benefit protection in
the event [his/her] employment is terminated, Executive and Nobel Learning entered into the Agreement. 
 Executive and Nobel Learning are
amending the Agreement to conform the Agreement to the original intent of the parties. 
 All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have
the meaning set forth in the Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and promises
contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, Nobel Learning and Executive hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Section 3(i)
of the Agreement, “Limitation on Benefits Contingent Upon Change in Control,” is hereby deleted in its entirety. 
 2. All of the
other terms and conditions of the Agreement, not inconsistent with the terms of this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment the date and year first written above. 
  

			
	NOBEL LEARNING COMMUNITIES, INC.
		
	By	 	 /s/ George Bernstein

	Name:	 	George Bernstein
	Title:	 	President and CEO



			
	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	 /s/ Jeanne Marie Welsko

	Print Name:	 	Jeanne Marie Welsko
Exhibit 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on (i) Forms S-3 (Nos.333-25995, 333-62155, 333-33726, 333-54616,
333-60912-01, 333-55866-01, 333-91316-01, 333-102961, and 333-102962-01) and
(ii) Form S-8 (No. 333-56343) of Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. of our
report dated March 3, 2004 relating to the financial statements, which
appears in this Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
March 4, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 (the "Report"),
I, Michael J. McCann, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Petroleum Helicopters, Inc.


By: /s/ Michael J. McCann
    ----------------------------------------
    Michael J. McCann
    Chief Financial Officer
    November 14, 2002
#### Bowen, Receiver, Respondent, vs. Kuehn, Appellant.

*December 3, 1890*

February 24, *1891.*

CORPORATIONS; ASSESSMENTS ON STOCK.

*Great Western Telegraph Co. v. Burnham, ante,*p. 47, followed.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of *Ifilwcmlcee*County.

The appeal is from an order overruling defendant’s demurrer to the complaint.

*George E. Sutherland',*for the appellant.

Eor the respondent there were briefs by *Shepard <& Shepard,*and *T. J. Sutherland,*and oral argument by *G. E. S/iepard.*

The following opinion was filed December 16, 1890:

Cole, C. J.

This action is brought by the receiver of the telegraph company to collect an assessment upon the stock subscribed for or purchased by the defendant. It is *54objected that the receiver, appointed by the Illinois court in a suit before it, has no capacity to sue in his own name as such receiver in the courts of this state. We shall not consider this vexed question, which has been so extensively discussed by the authorities, nor express any opinion upon it. We assume, for the purposes of this appeal, that the receiver might sue in his own name in the courts of this state to enforce a lawful assessment upon the unpaid subscriptions to the stock of the corporation. But we find the same fatal defect in the complaint in this case as in the *Burnham Case, ante,*p. 47. The complaint shows that a small number of the stockholders have paid the full par value of their stock; that other stockholders have paid forty' per cent, on the shares subscribed by them, while many others have never paid more than two per cent, or fifty cents on each share severally subscribed by them. An assessment of thirty-five per cent, is made on all the stockholders alike, except those who had paid in full. We have held in the *Burnhmn Case*that such an assessment was unequal, unjust, and should not be enforced. We deem it unnecessary to add anything to what is there said. It follows that the order of the superior court of Milwaukee county overruling the demurrer to the complaint must be reversed, and the cause be remanded for further proceedings according to law.

*By the*Court.—Ordered accordingly.

A motion for a rehearing was denied February 24, 1891.
# CE2004088EN.01051801.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/518 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/518

---

(2004/C 88 E/0530)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0626/04

by Juan Ferrández Lezaun (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(24 February 2004)

Subject:   The Spanish NHP alternatives

Subject:

The Spanish Government has submitted its request for European funding for transferring water from the River Ebro, as part of the Spanish NHP. As the Commission has already stated on several occasions, the vast scale of the water transfer means that a global assessment of the scheme will be carried out.

If the Commission finds against this global assessment, is it correct to state that the earmarked Community funding will not be allocated to this scheme?

Does the Commission know whether the Spanish Government has alternative schemes ready, should Community funding be refused for the Ebro water transfer scheme submitted?

What will happen to the funds earmarked for Spain?

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(29 March 2004)

(29 March 2004)

The financing of major projects through the two main Community financial instruments available to Spain, the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the Cohesion Fund, is subject to the respect for the regulations on these funds and the programming documents adopted for their implementation.

The Commission adopts its co-financing decisions on major projects in line with the relevant Community Regulations on these funds and in full compliance with all applicable Community legislation and policies.

At present, the Commission is in the process of analysing the submitted projects. A decision concerning the possible allocation of Community funds for these projects can only be taken once all the information has been carefully analysed. Therefore, it is too early to speculate on the outcome of this evaluation.

The Commission is not aware whether the Spanish authorities have alternative projects to the ones submitted for financing in case these are not accepted.

---
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dane A. Miller, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Biomet, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
   statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
   to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
   such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
   covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this report, fairly present in all material
   respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
   of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
   defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
   registrant and have:

  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

  (b) [Not Required]

  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation: and

  (d) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting that occured during the registrant's most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
   our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting,
   to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board
   of directors:

  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting.

Date: 4/14/2004                                /s/ Dane A. Miller
      ---------                                ------------------
                                               Dane A. Miller, Ph.D.
                                               President and
                                               Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. ("Caraco") for the year ended December
31, 2003 (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Caraco.

         March 30, 2004

                                       /s/ Jitendra N. Doshi
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Jitendra N. Doshi
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       And Chief Financial Officer
.. 

... 

\~ ., 

l"S-

\.J>] ' 7-l u.>: <' 

Dear Bill, 

REF ID:A2263002 e 

B. Hagelin 

69 Dearfield Drive 

Greenwich, Connecticut 

October 16, 1943. 

Stu jU8t read me your letter over the phone, and I 

want to thank you for the very kind and generous 

words you nad for my and Stu's pal't in the work for 

the converter. 

I have not heard from L.C.Smlths with regard to the 

presentation ceremony - they may believe be back in 

Sweden - but I will write Mr. Brown now, and express 

my hope th~t they can have me and Stu present at that 

occasion. 

Stu will be very busy the coming week in connection 

with a local war relief drive, so he cannot be in 

New York the comin5 Wednesday. I on the other hand 

shall be happy, if we co1..ild meet in New York, SO 

pleaae let me know when and where. If you are free 

for luncheon, I wo 1.ild be very ~310.d if you could join 

mo. And if you have to spend your night away from 

home, please try the facilit~es at 69 Dearfield Drive 

- wo are not nc.'.:lrly as crowded as the New York hotels! 

And Annie is uow e;ettlng so much better, that i:1hat 

she needs most now is to see some of our best friends 

- and I hope that you could be the first here, sinae 

her return fro:n tue hospi t;;;.l. Couldnt :C:llzabeth come 

wl t!1 you? 

I hope th~t a~l is well with you, and so lon~ - until 

Wednesday! 

Sincerely 

~~ 

~~ ~ q_£{ r~ 

~~: 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-30-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
Order entered April 22, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01181-CV

MIKE RAWLINGS, MAYOR, ET AL, Appellants

V.

TIMOTEO F. GONZALEZ ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-09605-J

ORDER

Appellees’ request for oral argument is GRANTED.

/s/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                  SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                       DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                                   4,957
<SECURITIES>                                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                           48,155
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            (4,005)
<INVENTORY>                                                             14,274
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                        78,093
<PP&E>                                                                 257,528
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         143,290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                         262,656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                   35,559
<BONDS>                                                                144,375
<COMMON>                                                                20,068
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                              3,322
<OTHER-SE>                                                              26,677
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                           262,656
<SALES>                                                                  6,694
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                        42,570
<CGS>                                                                    5,491
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           36,719
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                       3,657
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                          2,422
<INCOME-TAX>                                                             1,089
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                      1,333
<DISCONTINUED>                                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                                             1,333
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                              .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              .05
        

</TABLE>