alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-85523) pertaining to the Second Amended and Restated Merkert
American Corporation 1998 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of Marketing
Specialists Corporation of our reports (a) dated February 26, 1999 with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Richmont Marketing Specialists,
Inc., (b) dated March 25, 1998 with respect to the financial statements of Atlas
Marketing Company, Inc. and (c) dated March 7, 1997 with respect to the
financial statements of Bromar Inc. and Subsidiaries included in its Current
Report on Form 8-K dated September 1, 1999, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.


                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

                                        ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Dallas, Texas
September 1, 1999
nr. Arthur t. aamue1 

Eleetronic I&boratoriea 

Plant #2 

l June 1954. 

llltermtional Bua1ne•• Machine• Corp,. 

Poughkeepaie, '.leY York 

DMr 1>l'. Samuell 

In n:terence to your recently 1Ubmitted. torDllJ coveri?Sg 

your trip to the ll&tional Security .Apncy tor the •etinp 

on 20-21 Mq, our t1mne• peopa have uk.ed • to Hnd the 

inclo.ed form to J'OU• It Hema that in all 1uoh au••, 

they need & •iemtd certif'icato 1tat1.J2g that the "trav•ller" 

4id t:# 414 not. receive ~ loagtng ar -.1. at the ~nae 

or the govenu.nt. We b&ve tabn the liberty ot fillbg 

f.A thia certU'icate ~u.r J'OU• It' rou. Vill menly aign when 

inUeated and rriurn it in the !nel09e4 etthtloi>e, w Yill 

then PI"OC••• ycl'Ui' voucher •o that you -.y receive eonpen .. 1e.tion u pronpt~ •• l>Ol•ible. 

l Incl1 

BSA fora lll989 

I. T. McDONAJ.D 

~tain USAJ' 

.A.lat to Executiv• Secretary 

1llSA sctentU'ic M.v1aory Boe.rd 

@'pproved for Release bv NSA on 07-18-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352\3 

--------~- -----

............ ______________ ~
99-291.

#### Ohio Attorney Gen. v. John Doe 26.

Franklin App. Nos. 98AP-534 and 98AP-623. On motion to dismiss case against John Doe No. 54 or motion for summary judgment. Motions' denied.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


PRESS RELEASE

CONTACTS:
-------- 
Kenneth W. Watson
Little Switzerland, Inc.
(340) 776-2010

Mary Ellen Goodall
Walter Denby
D.F. King & Co., Inc.
(212) 269-5550

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
---------------------

                SEYMOUR HOLTZMAN INFORMS LITTLE SWITZERLAND THAT
                ------------------------------------------------
              HE WILL NOT STAND FOR ELECTION AT THE ANNUAL MEETING
              ----------------------------------------------------
                                        
     ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS, April 1, 1999.....Little Switzerland, Inc.
(NASDAQ:LSVI) today announced that Seymour Holtzman has informed the Company
that he will not stand for election as a Class I Director at the annual meeting
of stockholders scheduled for Wednesday, April 7, 1999.  The Board of Directors
will not nominate any other person in the place of Mr. Holtzman.  Thus,
immediately following the annual meeting, the Board will consist of five
directors.  The Board has nominated the following persons as its nominees for
election at the annual meeting: Adriane J. Dudley as a Class I Director, with a
term expiring at the 2001 annual meeting, and Melanie L. Sturm and Richard C.
Hunter as Class III Directors, each with a term expiring at the 2000 annual
meeting.  At the annual meeting, properly executed proxies voting in favor of
the Board's nominees will be voted for the election of Adriane J. Dudley,
Melanie L. Sturm and Richard C. Hunter.
 
     Little Switzerland, Inc. is a leading specialty retailer of brand name
watches, jewelry, crystal, china, fragrances and accessories, operating 21
stores on nine Caribbean islands, and two stores in Alaska cruise ship
destinations.  The Company's primary market consists of vacationing tourists
attracted by free-port pricing, duty-free allowances and a wide variety of high
quality merchandise.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-50059

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICARDO LONGORIA-ROBLEDO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-01-CR-397-ALL-WWJ

--------------------

June 19, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ricardo Longoria-Robledo appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Longoria-Robledo complains that his sentence was improperly

enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) based on his prior

deportation following an aggravated felony conviction. LongoriaRobledo argues that the sentencing provision violates the Due

Process Clause because it permitted the sentencing judge to find,

under a preponderance of the evidence standard, a fact which
No. 02-50059

-2-

increased the statutory maximum sentence to which he otherwise

would have been exposed. Longoria-Robledo thus contends that his

sentence is invalid and argues that it should not exceed the

two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(a). 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Longoria-Robledo acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). This court

must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court

itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of

the district court is AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

 AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
USCIB: 29 ./4 

5 October 1954 

SONFIB!!l'i'IAJ:i 

Ml!MORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIBEC: 

Subject: 

Ref'erence: 

Procedure f'or Handling Matters Involving Base Rights 

f'or Intercept Activities in Foreign Countries. 

USCIB 29./2 of 21 September 1954. 

1. Vote sheet responses to the proposal set f'orth in the 

reference reflect a general desire to discuss the matter at the next 

regula1• meeting. 

2. Inf'orma.l. comments received by the office of the Executive 

Secretary indicate some opinion in favor of establishing an Ad Hoc 

Committee to examine the problem f'or the purpose of submitting 

recommendations as to whether a Standing Committee 0£ USCIB is reall.7 

required and, if so, just what it ought to do. 

3. Accordingly, this matter will be placed on the Agenda for 

discussion at the next regular meeting of USCIBEC. 

USCIB: 29./4 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-17-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352B 

cel\n:.'Be1 l .YOI :lij r'AL 

24
# CE2004084EN.01015601.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/156 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/156

---

(2004/C 84 E/0193)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0062/04

by Giorgio Calò (ELDR) and Antonio Di Pietro (ELDR) to the Commission

(20 January 2004)

Subject:   Discriminatory treatment of Community research students in Germany

Subject:

On the basis of the internal rules of the Max Planck Society in Germany foreign research students, unlike their German fellow students, do not have access to the regular employment contract BAT IIa/2, but receive a grant (‘Stipendium’), which is tax-free and not subject to social security contributions.

This discrimination affects hundreds of foreign students, most of them from Community countries, and naturally has substantial repercussions on guarantees and rights in the areas of social security and health.

The Max Planck Society, 80 % of whose funding comes from public sources, is bound by the principles of the Constitution and the founding principles of the Treaty concerning non-discrimination, freedom of movement and residence, freedom of establishment and equal opportunities.

In view of the blatant violation of these principles, can the Commission intervene by adopting urgent measures to ensure that the aforementioned discriminatory treatment of Community research students in Germany is discontinued?

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(23 February 2004)

(23 February 2004)

EU nationals have the right to work in other Member States (Article 39 of the EC Treaty). This right to free movement of workers includes the right to have equal access to jobs and equal treatment in relation to working conditions as compared to the nationals of the host Member State.

On the basis of Article 39 nationals of other Member States must, therefore, be allowed to apply for research positions for which an employment contract is offered (like the positions under BAT IIa/2 as concerned in the written question) at the German Max Planck Society in the same way as German nationals.

According to the information of the Commission, nationals of other Member States are equally entitled to apply for research posts (e.g. Doktorandenstellen). In the job-offers for Doktorandenstellen currently put online at the homepage of the Max Planck Society (23 January 2004) no nationality condition is stipulated.

In order to be able to further evaluate if the facts contained in the written question might constitute a breach of Community law, the Honourable Members are therefore invited to send more information to the Commission (Directorate-General Employment and Social Affairs), including information about the cases of the non-German EU nationals who were refused application for such a Doktorandenstelle on the basis of their nationality or who have obtained such a post but without the working conditions as foreseen for BAT IIa/2 employees.

---
**Exhibit 10.5**

FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (the“Amendment”) is made this 31st day of December 2008 between BIOMET, INC., an Indiana corporation (“Biomet”), and Glen A. Kashuba (“Executive”). All capitalized terms used herein shall have themeanings ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement (defined below), unless otherwise defined herein. 

WHEREAS, Biomet and Executiveentered into that certain Employment Agreement dated as of February 28, 2008 (the “Employment Agreement”); and 

WHEREAS, Biomet and Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth herein; 

NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Biomet and Executive hereby agree as follows: 

1. Section 9(e):****Termination by the Company Other Than For Cause, Death or Disability, or by the Executive for Good Reason, Following aChange of Control. Section 9(e)(i) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to delete the final sentence of Section 9(e)(i) in its entirety and replace it with the following: 

“The total amount of the Change of Control Severance Benefit will be paid: (1) if the Change in Control constitutes a change in control eventwithin the meaning of Treasury Regulation 1.409A-3(i)(5), in a lump sum as soon as administratively practicable (but in no event later than 30 days) following the Date of Termination or (2) if the Change of Control does not constitute a changein control event within the meaning of Treasury Regulation 1.409A-3(i)(5), in equal, ratable installments in accordance with the Company’s regular payroll policies over the course of the Non-Compete Period.” 

2. Miscellaneous. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This Amendmentmay be executed in two (2) or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 

*    *    *    *    * 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this First Amendment to Employment Agreement on thedate first set forth above. 

 
BIOMET, INC.By: 
/s/ Bradley J. Tandy
Name: Bradley J. TandyTitle: Senior Vice President, General Counsel & SecretaryEXECUTIVE
/s/ Glen A. Kashuba
Name: Glen A. Kashuba
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 41 (Tuesday, March 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11415-11425]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04363]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Revised Non-Foreign Overseas Per Diem Rates

AGENCY: Defense Travel Management Office, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of Revised Non-Foreign Overseas Per Diem Rates.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Travel Management Office is publishing Civilian 
Personnel Per Diem Bulletin Number 295. This bulletin lists revisions 
in the per diem rates prescribed for U.S. Government employees for 
official travel in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana 
Islands and Possessions of the United States when applicable. AEA 
changes announced in Bulletin Number 194 remain in effect. Bulletin 
Number 295 is being published in the Federal Register to assure that 
travelers are paid per diem at the most current rates.

DATES: Effective Date: March 1, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Sonia Malik, 571-372-1276.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document gives notice of revisions in 
per diem rates prescribed by the Defense Travel Management Office for 
non-foreign areas outside the contiguous United States. It supersedes 
Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin Number 294. Per Diem Bulletins 
published periodically in the Federal Register now constitute the only 
notification of revisions in per diem rates to agencies and 
establishments outside the Department of Defense. For more information 
or questions about per diem rates, please contact your local travel 
office. Civilian Bulletin 295 includes updated rates for Alaska.

    Dated: February 26, 2015.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[[Page 11416]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03MR15.000


[[Page 11417]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03MR15.001


[[Page 11418]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03MR15.002


[[Page 11419]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03MR15.003


[[Page 11420]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03MR15.004


[[Page 11421]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03MR15.005


[[Page 11422]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03MR15.006


[[Page 11423]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03MR15.007


[[Page 11424]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03MR15.008


[[Page 11425]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03MR15.009

[FR Doc. 2015-04363 Filed 3-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
'> 

"---"! · .• .#< -

... fl.'·~­ l'l'dda, hi\ Telephone lceboa~. Inc. w~~ 

., toik 14. R4N lodE 

.., DI'. hl.17• 

-~- ->. • -...,.7. 

llfUt l '-5 °\ L.\-

'1, ~~~-~~-

la ..,. U$1. 10U at 76llf' c~ ~ oo.3\ ~ 10 ~ avail .. ale ~ ._·1.Y ~J U;o ~ ol Di"~ Ol.amltt ~. ShNJA9n -., • C.~·n~-J.ts;.t 

c o.rtain ~ ia lllit;h h~ ~· -~~ q~i04 \Q ~~t. ue. 

I'- bu QO\I ffoc=o appaNnt tbat Dr. ~ fJOliil.d~ 1t be INN ..:to 

...uaolft t.o ~ ~ 1n \he ~iat.o htui'v !OI' a llCl:ith ot c~UnUU ~ ... be ot oon:!dera!>le aid 1n our ~rk on m es:pac1.all1 Ylt&l 

p151tl• uov controtlt.in& \1$• I hlly ~. ~t t.ba atmcme or nr. 

SbflAJIOD vUl - • ~" of. 1ncormmlance to 10ur fJt'pnhatlon• a JVU _,be aura that. anlJ" the ~st canpell~ nasom -.o Ee~ =Be tho 

~-

In r:nxt lat.tor ot Mv U, 19'Sl to ~al #alt.er .a. Saith. !>iJ"oet(r 

ttt C.""1 laWUs~. aekln:; waUahl• Dr. ~·a r:..n.1alpat1on1 

pa Fto;to* thl.t his aerr1ccJg bo oontrib-.J.tcd bz ti• I,.aboratorJ.ea1 _ w:tt.h ,..\ir.l•el}~ ~ b1a '*" t.ba iklY4lftl-.en~ tor inc~ t.rPOl IDl'1 uv1 _, 

... ._- TM.a ~ fiu . .._. -1n11rit"~-.. HllifactOr.i. ·nu ~ 

==U:-t!"tr..:~~!t~,!t1~~~::~~:'! id.n.\ "Joopa or MJh partid._pa - - m'.! the bas13 on ••Sch it shOu1.d 

W ~. T td.&hl ~ a.t. the llQllln'~ tl\at ""voA<l be gild to pq n.-• .._on t...• •.ial ~.&1~""1*''• t.,.j·cr-+so~oo ~..r '1a.1 in tdd.ition to t.• 

..-i F ~ 3,n U~ '>f ~~\wWQ-t -.1 tno~1. t.rave1 aponae • ..a.a~ vtili1 ~'Wm", to dieousa 1fl aero~ the.aa canGideratd.om 

~ ll"OA a ~~ -~~ ut tr.r • .J~ ... ! ~l be ~t ~­ tlo do :so .t\bai" oenlb 1..7 td."¥+'1o.~ e-r 11.r corras;ponde~, 

.. - ../. ..... - ~ . - ' -

_ ~ ~ Ji.1 •z~t.ion ~or Zf!:::tt ~t ~u~ ~ ~urt ,.. cti'!lt ~tutill' tba monl ~t con·.JdaraU.ot1 Ot l&tlcm&l. riot~ 

Cl'ii'!.~ 1il8 \o do the NijiJest. - ~...__"( 

... 1-- ...... -· •• - ~·· 

-- -------- .. ----=--~----=-~ - ;:::; ..... -- -------- ~ 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 06-16-2014 pursuantto E ,0, 1352a
EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the Quarterly Report of HEI, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended November 26, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Timothy Clayton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of my knowledge:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.       /s/ Timothy C. Clayton         Timothy C. Clayton    Chief Financial Officer  Date: January 10, 2006    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HEI, Inc.and will be retained by HEI, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
kingly_ex103.htm



EXHIBIT 10.3




 


 


MINUTES OF


BOARD OF DIRECTORS


OF


Kingly Chateau Corporation







This meeting of the Board of Directors of the Corporation was held at 10:00 a.m. on June 22, 2011 at Flat/Room 1705A, 17/F, Tower 1, Silvercord, 30 Canton Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon, Hong Kong.







TUNG Yee Shing was present as the sole Director of the Corporation. The meeting was called to order by TUNG Yee Shing.







Whereas, the Board of Directors of the Corporation believes it to be in the best interests of the Corporation to provide a Private Placement Memorandum to qualified investors up to $10,000.00 at a price of $0.01 per share for a total of up to1,000,000 shares.







Resolved, that the Corporation will issue up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock as subscription for up to $10,000 of common stock at a price of $0.01 per share upon the receipt of said funds as well as a completed documents pursuant to the Private Placement Memorandum.







There being no further business to come before the meeting, upon motion duly made, seconded and unanimously carried it was adjourned.

















__________________________


TUNG Yee Shing, President

















Attest: _______________________


TUNG Yee Shing, Secretary
REF ID:A66101 

9 .Apr 53 C<MmN'r lo. 3 

l. "Tl1e 1ncl.oaure baa been d111CU11sed betlfeen SEC (M&J. Kra.ner) and 

the Aa11iataut to the Special Aaaiatant (Lt. McDoJBJ.d). 

2. In the light ar Seetion I &Dd para.graphs la. auc1. 3f· or Section III 

or the tncl.oeure1 u well aa action current)¥ being initiated in regard to 

ISA c~tanta, it u rec~nded that paragraph 34. ot Section III be 

amitted tram the prcwoaed regulation. 

3· Ma.j. lCTa.mer concurs. 

I~ !!. McOOIALD 

Aaat tO S/ltSS'l! 

@'pproved for Release bv NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352\3
JOSEPH M. SOUKI Speaker ofthe House

Mr. Scott Faulk Department ofTransportation Dear Mr. Faulk: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STATE OF HAWAII ; STATE CAPITOL, ROOM 431 415 SOUTH BERETANIA STREET HONOLULU, HAWAII 96813 ;November27, 2013 Phone: (808) 586-6100 Fax: (808) 586-6101

····. ';

I am writing to support MokeleleAirline's 4 year bid to Kalaupapa to Kahului, Honolulu and Ho'olehua. \ Mokulele is the best candid$te as they have lowerfares, experienced friendly agents, frequentflights, multiple islands and east ofbooking via Global Distribution System (Expedia, Travelocity, Orbitz, Priceline, etc.) It is importantthat we have safe, stable and affordable service to Kalaupapa. i i Please select Mokulele

### Airli~es to service Kalaupapa for4 years.

C: Yuki Lei Sugimura Connec, LLC Connecting Culture, Community and Education Sincerely,



# - Joseph M. Souki Speaker ofthe House
Lt. Butler, A/G 

REF 

UNCLASSIFIED 

Alnendment or Order 1946 

&/ASST (~Friedman} 15 June 1954 

I.T. HcDonald/6o493 

It u :req,ue•ted that Order 1946 dated. 25 May 1954 uaued to nr .. Stewarts. 

Cairna be a.mended to caver approx1:ma:te17 !Q "!z! Umtead of five &Lya. 

I. T. McDONAll> 

Captain tEAF 

M•' t to Special. Aa•1•tant 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-18-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

~------------------- ---- -
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-17-00424-CV

IN RE DOUBLE DIAMOND, INC.

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.1

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed December 22, 2017

[OT06]

 

1

In light of our disposition, we dismiss relator’s motion for temporary relief as moot. 
In re Double Diamond, Inc. Page 2
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Interest of D.W.G.K. and S.F.R.K., Minor Children

No. 06

- 17

- 00124

- CV Appeal from the 336th District Court of Fannin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. FA

- 16

- 42653 ). Opinion d elivered by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We note that the appellant s adequately indicated their inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED AUGUST 6, 2018 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk