alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004084EN.01084701.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/847 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/847

---

(2004/C 84 E/0941)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0698/04

by Daniel Varela Suanzes-Carpegna (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(9 March 2004)

Subject:   Tinned food and olive oil

Subject:

The Community's Mediterranean countries are the world's largest olive oil producers. This sensitive product, one of the Mediterranean area's major agricultural crops, is used for a considerable range of preserved, semi-preserved and prepared fish and seafood, either as the liquid in which these products are preserved, or as an ingredient, since it has significant nutritional qualities, and on foreign markets, has become a synonym for quality and healthy eating.

The production costs faced by Community businesses are much higher than those of their third country competitors. If the elimination of reimbursements for the production of olive oil for preserving purposes persists, will the EU reduce or suspend custom duties on imported olive oil, so that Community businesses can continue to compete with their third country counterparts on an equal footing?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(6 April 2004)

(6 April 2004)

The Community accounts for 80 % of world olive oil production and intra-Community trade in olive oil makes up the bulk of the world olive oil trade. The international reference prices for olive oil are determined in the Community. Thus Community manufacturers of food products using olive oil have the advantage of operating where the biggest supply of olive oil in the world is to be found. In these circumstances reducing customs duty on olive oil to be used by food manufacturers would be unjustified when the market is operating in its normal way.

In our proposal for a new common market organisation for olive oil and table olives we include provisions whereby, in the exceptional event of extremely high prices in the Community, it would be possible, in order to allow the market to be adequately supplied, for customs duties to be suspended fully or in part or a reduced rate import quota opened. Given the proportion of the world total that Community production accounts for, the need to use these provisions would rarely occur.

---
Karen Hay s, C hief Air Protection Branch UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REG I O N 4 ATLA N TA FEDERAL CENTE R 61 FORSYTH STREET ATLA N TA , GEORGIA 30303-8960 

### DEC 9 2015
Environmenta l Protection Di vis ion Georgia Department of Natural Resources 4244 International Parkway, S uite 120 At lanta, Georgia 30354 Dear Ms. H ays: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4, Air, P es ti cides and Taxies Management Divi s ion conduc t ed a mid-year evaluation of the Performance Partnership Grant's associated fiscal year (FY) 20 15 Section 1 05 commitme nt s in the 

### Air Planning Ag reement (APA). The EPA a nd the state have r eac hed agreement o n the FY 20 1 5 Section 1 05 work-plan commitments; and through this eval uation , your agency ha s made sufficient progress in m eeti ng i ts commitments. The following work plan activity listed under Cross Cutting Issues , Commitment # I was not committed to by the state as part of the FY 20 15 APA due to r esource constraints, although it is acknowledged as an activity the EPA has r eques t ed state programs to commit to und ertake as part of the APA: Due to budget constraints , the Georgia EPD has d isco ntinu ed program acti vit ie s associated w ith implementation of th e Asbes to s National Emiss ion Standa rds for Hazard ous Air P ollutants (NESHAP) program. The components that are discontinued are the Asbestos NES HAP inspections , complaint follow-up and enforcement. Th e E PA assumed responsibilities for implementation of those program duties to fulfill our res p o n s ibilities und er th e Clean 

### Air Act (CAA). T he EPA and Georgia E PD met in March 2013 to discuss these iss u es; however , at this time , the EPA has not made any det ermin a tion regardin g th e impact of discontinuing implementation of the specified program activities on the Asbestos NESHAP program delegation or the CAA Section I 05 grant. We look forward to conti nuing our wo rk with yo u a nd your staff o n the se i ss u es to impl e ment your FY 2015 Air Pollution Co ntr ol Program. Ifyou hav e a ny question s rega rding your grant, please contact Miya Smith at (404) 562-9091 o r Mary Echols at (404) 562-9053. Sincerely, 

# C)p ..K )\



# ~'"

**~e~rly** H.



# Baru **st~ r**  Director Air. Pesticides and Tax ies Management Di vision

I n ternet Address (UR L) • h tt p://www.epa

. gov Recycled/Recyclable • Pnnted wi t h Vege t ab le 01 1Based I nks on Recycled Pal)ef ( M in i mum 30% Post co n sumer)
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1412 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to qualify homeless youth 

and veterans who are full-time students for purposes of the low income 

housing tax credit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2015 

Mr. FRANKEN (for himself, Mr. PORTMAN, Mrs. MURRAY, Ms. COLLINS, and 

Mr. KING) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to qualify 

homeless youth and veterans who are full-time students 

for purposes of the low income housing tax credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Housing for Homeless 

5 Students Act of 2015’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1412 IS

1 SEC. 2. HOMELESS YOUTH AND VETERANS WHO ARE FULL2 TIME STUDENTS QUALIFIED FOR PURPOSES 

3 OF THE LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (i) of section 42(i)(3)(D) 

5 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by re6 designating subclauses (II) and (III) as subclauses (IV) 

7 and (V), respectively, and by inserting after subclause (I) 

8 the following new subclauses: 

9 ‘‘(II) a full-time student who, 

10 during any portion of the 7-year pe11 riod ending with the commencement 

12 of such individual’s continuous occu13 pation of any low-income unit or 

14 units, was an individual described in 

15 section 725(2) of the McKinney-Vento 

16 Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 

17 11434a), 

18 ‘‘(III) a full-time student who, 

19 during any portion of the 5-year pe20 riod ending with the commencement 

21 of such individual’s continuous occu22 pation of any low-income unit or 

23 units, was an individual described in 

24 section 2002(1) of title 38, United 

25 States Code,’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•S 1412 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to determinations made before, 

3 on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
.. 

USCIB: 3.1/5 

1 April 1954 

'f OP Si!.iORM PRO'l'H PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

ME.vlORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Downgrading of References to U.S.-Canadian Collaboration 

to SECRET. 

USCIB 13.1/4 of 1$ February 1954. 

l. Further conversation with thel l with regard 

to the proper interpretation of enclosure 3 with the reference, reveals 

that the Canadians want the actual CANUSA Agreement and specific 

references thereto treated as TOP SECREI' code-word material, but are 

willing to permit evidence of collaboration that would not reveal the 

existence of a written and negotiated agreement to be classified on its 

merits but in any case not lower than SECRET without any code word. 

2. Accordingly, I have assumed that the concurrence accorded the 

reference can be extended to include the above and have sent the 

enclosed reply to LOCUS, Ottawa for delivery to CRC. 

Enclosure 

Copy of CIB #000111 dtd 31 Mar 1954. 

USCIB: 3.1/5 

aptain, U. S. Navy 

ecutive Secretary, USCIB 

31 
-

CIB # 000111 

31 March 1954 

TOP SJ!:CI&r FRO'fII PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

MEMORANDlil~ FOR THE CHAIRMAN, COMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH COMMITTEE, OTTAWA: 

'Subject: Downgrading of References to Canadian-U. S •. Collaboration 

to SECRET. 

1. I have been instructed to inform you that the understanding 

conveyed in your cordial memorandum. of February 5, 1954 on this subject 

is accepted by USCIB. 

2. It will therefore be our practice in the future to restrict 

knowledge of a written and negotiated Canadian-U.S. Agreement in the 

COMINT field to mdoctrinated persons. In implementation of this 

understanding we will employ the classification TOP SECRET and the 

appropriate code word when making specific references to such Agreement. 

3. We do, however, understand that mere revelation of the fact 

that there is collaboration in the COMINT field between the U.S. and 

Canada without reference to arry specific agreement may, if appropriate, 

be classified not lower than SECRET without a code word an4 may, in 

case of necessity and under properly controlled conditions, be revealed 

to non-indoctrinated persons who require such knowledge for the i.~telligent fulfillment of legitimate governmental functions. 

4. We suggest 15 April 1954 as a convenient date upon which to 

put this new practice in effect and, in the absence of an objection 

from your Committee, will consider it so agreed. 

5. I oust add my apologies for the long delay in replying to 

your last letter and hope you will understand +.hat. i+. was kcasioned by 

the discussions which took place between yourl d myself in 

order to clarify our understanding of some minor administrative aspects 

of the above. 

(Signed) 

RUFUS L. TAYLOR 

Captain, U. S. Navy 

Executive Secretary, USCIB 

Enclosure with USCIB 3.1/5 dtd 1 Apr 1954. 

TOP SECRET FROTH
This docwnen1.. is to be read only by thoee peraonnel officially indoctrinated in .... .ceordance with com- munication intelligence security regulations and e.utbortzed to receive the information reported herein. 

1 5 MAY 1953 

.fE't} 3.3(h)(2) 

PL\86-36/50 USC 3605 

ormer ime lliDiater, in Paris 'for the GeDeral 

mee ~'reopened the queet1~6f ~ca-•ic&tion 

Security. Be recalled that tbe nAlJ.iete" I 8e\'Wal JDCllt.ba preYiO\lltly, 

bad Wormed tbe I . tvould receive coatidelltial 

inf'oma.tion whee she be~ a member ot IA'l'O encl/that the imecuri ty \~ 

tbel laisht lead to 1eaD o:f'/thia/ iDtmmaticm amt. •-

d&Dger the Allied cryptographic a19tem. 

3. Qi 27 September 1951 the requeated 

that CEO repreaentati vee aAVise tn. regarding the practicabill ty and 

security ot codi.Dg alld. decoding.achlllea. Thia requeat vu tonrarded 

traa CIA to .AJBA. (TAB/l) 

4. CM 20 J'ebnl&ry 1952, /the letter :trail CIA contaiDing tbe above 

vu fOl'VU"CJed trQl"tbe Otticeot Operaticu to ANA comW.taat. (TAB 2) 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-14-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
REF . .__ 

Kr~ Wa."1. ter 'QMr;y 

43S 3, OUraon Avc:iw.> 

Loa Angele• ;.S, CDl1tomi• 

Dear Kr. &a917s 

Pollctd.ng uo on •7 letter ot l'l Fe~1,., I bute11 to advise 

that the tranadatt ona you ma<ia ot tho two Ira.nth took• on C1"JPtoP'&Ph.1' wre. nmar printed. Jlot onl.T would it be ditticUlt nmr to 

look up th9 correapond.e"CCo w aaoertun, 1t poa111bl.e,. why they 

Wl'e not p't'J..ntod_,. but .u.. .. o I am aomer.mat ambl&tTassed to b.lve to 

•Cb! t. that I tlnd no trac• or the t:ranslation• tbol!'&Selv•e. '?.hey 

wro p1'>'babl7 aent. t.o ®11'1'.l storage depot ;year• qo, 

So rar as I can sea there would bo no obJect.1.on to )'OUl" u.a1ng t·'~ tranttl&t.inn:s tor any purpose th"°t dou mt t.ie 1n nth thi.s 

.Agenc7. Howvar, i.t you viah merol;y to get rld of tho rat...l\er 

bnl.ky matorlal aid. see no purpose in 70".J.r keeping the.1 possUil.7 

vo might. 11ke to at.ore the tranislati.ons ho~ toohr11c11 library. 

Should JOU lf1ab1 therefore, to uko U3 a '?X'fsSertt. of ~'le material, 

I u inclosir.4 a franked, ae.U'-addresscd label tor your mnven1ence. 

Thankln!J :you. for JOUl" past cooporat1on..,, I a,. 

Incl a 

Label. 

COi AG 

c/s 

S/ASf!t 

Sino el'8171 

WILLIAM r .. FlU.IJllAN 

Speei«l .A!Jf iatazrt, 

M/Ra Self-explanatory. Ret. Ser. 982 dtd 9 Mar .$3 

w. F. Friedman/S/Aast/60493/19 Mar SJ 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-20-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

........ ____ "':'"' ~-- .
Draft Proposal CB-22 

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

(IECC).   Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/

Access Doors and Openings (CB-22) 

Objective:  Clarify the components covered in the section on doors and access openings to shafts,

chutes, stairways, and elevator lobbies are subject to air leakage provisions as components of the

building thermal envelope, and provide a distinction between these doors and other doors that are

already covered within the scope of fenestration assemblies.

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise Section C402.4.4 as follows:  

C402.4.4 Doors and access openings to shafts, chutes, stairways, and elevator lobbies. Doors and 

access openings from conditioned space to shafts, chutes, stairways and elevator lobbies not within the 

scope of the fenestration assemblies covered in Section C402.4.3 shall either meet the requirements of 

Section C402.4.3 or shall be gasketed, weatherstripped or sealed. 

Exception: Door openings required to comply with Section 715 or 715.4 of the International Building 

Code; or doors and door openings required to comply with UL 1784 by the International Building Code to 

comply with UL 1784 shall not be required to comply with Section C402.4.4. 

Reason:  Clarification.  Some doors are covered by Section C402.4.3 and the intent of the code should be

that those doors that are within the scope of fenestration that can be tested and listed should  be tested

and listed in accordance with and meet the provisions of Section C402.4.3.  This leaves those doors that

cannot be tested and listed subject to the caulking and sealing criterion.  The current code allows some

doors that could (and should) be assessed as meeting the provisions of Section C402.4.3 only required to

be “caulked or sealed.”  The exception is revised to provide clarification and to eliminate the ending

statement—an  exception by definition means something is not required to comply.

Cost Impact:   There is no cost impact associated with this proposed change.
#### Gal D. Reuveni et al., Appellants, v Becec, Inc., Respondent.

[771 NYS2d 912]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dabiri, J.), dated May 14, 2003, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant demonstrated, prima facie, its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by showing that there was ade*368quate playground supervision and, in any event, that the level of supervision was not the proximate cause of the incident *(see Cranston v Nyack Pub. Schools,*303 AD2d 441 [2003]; *Navarra v Lynbrook Pub. Schools Lynbrook Union Free School Dist.,*289 AD2d 211 [2001]; *Ancewicz v Western Suffolk BOCES,*282 AD2d 632 [2001]). The burden then shifted to the plaintiffs to produce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to show the existence of a triable issue of fact. The plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to inadequate supervision and whether the level of supervision was a proximate cause of the alleged accident *(see Mirand v City of New York,*84 NY2d 44 [1994]; *Ceglia v Portledge School,*187 AD2d 550 [1992]). Therefore, the motion for summary judgment was properly granted. Santucci, J.P., Florio, Schmidt and Mastro, JJ., concur.
# CE2004084EN.01017301.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/173 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/173

---

(2004/C 84 E/0213)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0196/04

by Ward Beysen (NI) to the Commission

(29 January 2004)

Subject:   Temporary agency workers directive

Subject:

Does the definition of ‘pay’ exclude pensions, other financial benefits and overtime? If so, does the Commission intend to expressly exclude these items in the proposed directive?

If the aforementioned items are not expressly excluded from the proposed Directive, is it intended that their application (or exclusion) should be determined by Member States or by collective agreements? If so, does the Commission intend to expressly state this intention in the proposed directive?

Does the Commission intend the comparison of basic working and employment conditions to be made on the basis of an overall comparison rather than an item-by-item comparison?

Does the Commission intend to make it clear in the proposed directive that temporary workers should be paid according to their qualifications, expertise and the nature of the job — meaning that in some circumstances temporary workers could be paid less than permanent workers?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(4 March 2004)

(4 March 2004)

The Honourable Member questions the Commission about certain provisions in the proposed directive on working conditions for temporary agency workers.

Regarding the definition of salary, the Commission noted that during their negotiations in the Council the Member States deemed it necessary to point out that the principle of non-discrimination does not apply to occupational social security schemes, including occupational pension and health insurance schemes and financial contribution schemes. On the other hand it has always been very clear that overtime is included in the definition of salary. Providing for the contrary or granting such an exemption has not at any time been considered.

With regard to general working and employment conditions, reference should be made to the amended Commission proposal. The principle of non-discrimination has essentially been reformulated in such a manner as to rule out any alternative. The same basic working and employment conditions that the worker would have enjoyed if he/she had been recruited directly by the user undertaking to hold the same job, should be applied to the temporary agency worker. From now on, the point of reference is the post held by the temporary agency worker. Their situation is no longer comparable to that of any similar worker employed by the user undertaking. On the other hand, the basic working and employment conditions that should be set are those that the user undertaking would have had to apply if, instead of employing an agency temp, it had decided to recruit directly, for an identical period of time

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         MAR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-29-1997
<CASH>                                         11,022 
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  13,507
<ALLOWANCES>                                    3,259 
<INVENTORY>                                       905 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               22,838       
<PP&E>                                         15,668      
<DEPRECIATION>                                 12,218    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 28,269      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          13,521    
<BONDS>                                         1,000  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                       58,081 
<OTHER-SE>                                   (43,333)       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   28,269
<SALES>                                         5,144
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                7,198          
<CGS>                                           2,727          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   7,924          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (562)       
<INCOME-TAX>                                       35
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (527)      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                    (527) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.04) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.04) 
        
                                  


</TABLE>
REF ID:A67442 

mRV• IDO 

QllP 

SO a AO 

l.. It. ltJ nque1ted th:at wanl or«.n .tor Ill'. John c. M4'Phel"$)D 

Cd.oh ao:Uiorl.194 tnval fl'OJI S1*'t .IS.11•.- ..., Jarse1 to "Jalb1np:n1. 

D .. e. m1 n~, com:..oncJ.ng on or •'*'' l rewi.aar.r US> fo1t tol#' 4111, b9 eeeellfld. 

1. 11r. l!CPm.raon dld not. ue ill• t,nmportat.loa nqutau lilhloh .,.. J'lltturned ben".li't.b. 

lttU.IM F. ntf..It!.AI 

i'pl01al ...... tan, 

l!!\pproved for Release by NS~ on 0?-30 2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352d--

...
Doc ID: 3552288
Doc ID: 3552288
Doc ID: 3552288
Doc ID: 3552288
Doc ID: 3552288
Doc ID: 3552288
Doc ID: 3552288
Doc ID: 3552288
Doc ID: 3552288
Doc ID: 3552288
Doc ID: 3552288
Doc ID: 3552288
Doc ID: 3552288
Doc ID: 3552288
Doc ID: 3552288
Doc ID: 3552288
Doc ID: 3552288
Doc ID: 3552288
Doc ID: 3552288
REF ID:A41587~ 

. -

Seri&l: ~4 ~ 

Ir 1~ iqJ'f 

Brlp41er Oe:aeral tell c. IU.we,. 00/\J' (Bet.) 

Electronic:a l>iviaicm 

General Electric Company · 

Blc1g" ,}l, Zlectron1.ca Park Syracuae~ W.W. York. 

Deu- Ge~ 81vn~ . 

I aat pleued v1th ~acceptance 01' tne invitaticm to be 

a aember ~ tbe 'I'elecoamunicationa Panel ot tbe- National. Security 

J,gerq Seientitlc Advisory' Board. 

. Tbe nut ~tirlg ot the M.~1aory- Board 1t••1t vUl pl"Obablf 

be held OD 20-21 April •. At tbat tim 1t ia oxpecteo. that a report · 

OD the panel ..,,.,.ehip Vill be sulm&itted to the J3ou4 qetlier . vitb ao• p~ that cu be referred tor epecit1c panel action. 

G'-lbsequent to th1a Boe.rd •eting, the ~l cll&U-.n, vbo .ue aleo 

saabtr• ~ the BoilLTd., -V.tll be able to conf'er v.i.th you ou mttera 

ot 1Dttoctrinat10D, panel orpni.at1on arx1 tuture Gctivitiea. 

I . . . . \ . . . 

I vi1h to ti».nlt J'OU i"or ':four rea4.Y acceptanc" or lf1'¥ · in":l tat ton, ainee· :lt U 1D41~t:1ve ot your 1ntveat i.n ,and 1our •stime.te 

.or tbe ~e Qf the problem v1th vh:l.cb ve aiat contend :1n 

tbe intere•t. or t.be natioDG.l a.etenae,, · I em look1np :te?'Ward to 

aee11'6 yt'J'J. vben ¥QU a.re next in Yaab~to::i. 

cc: AG . c/s ·. · . s/ASST (Mr. Frie~) 

Sincerel,y, 

lW.PB J. CABI?m 

Uwtemz,\t Geaeral, 'CE t.raq · Director 

MfR: ·Acknowledgment of Gen. Rives'acceptance of t~ Director's 

invitation to be a. member of the NS.ASAB's Telecommunications Panel• 

M.M.Rele~ski/S/PtSST/6o493/l2 Feb 54 

@'pproved for. Release by NSA on 12-01-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352a
Doc ID: 3132514
Doc ID: 3132514
Doc ID: 3132514
Doc ID: 3132514
Doc ID: 3132514
Doc ID: 3132514
Doc ID: 3132514