alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30557

Summary Calendar

 

FANNIE OLIVER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-20-E

- - - - - - - - - -

January 31, 1997

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

Fannie Oliver appeals from the summary judgment for the

defendant in her Social Security action. Oliver contends solely

that the Administrative Law Judge failed to determine whether she

could obtain and maintain employment on a day-to-day basis. 

Oliver did not raise her contention before the Appeals Council;

she did not exhaust administrative remedies as to the contention. 
No. 96-30557

- 2 -

We find no reason to waive the exhaustion requirement in Oliver’s 

case. Consequently, we lack jurisdiction over Oliver’s appeal. 

Paul v. Shalala, 29 F.3d 208, 210 (5th Cir. 1994).

APPEAL DISMISSED.
# CE2004078EN.01068301.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/683 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/683

---

(2004/C 78 E/0728)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-4072/03

by John Cushnahan (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(8 January 2004)

Subject:   Application of the EC-Israel Association Agreement

Subject:

Does the Commission consider that the proposal announced in November 2003 by Israel ‘to list the city of origin for the goods’ on proofs of origin (or on products) would enable ‘the national customs authorities to determine, for each and every individual consignment, whether, under those provisions, the elements of fact and law allow refusal of the preferential tariff treatment’?

Does the Commission consider that listing the name of a locale can enable Member States to identify Israeli settlement goods commingled in shipments with essentially identical goods originating in Israel, products incorporating settlement-produced components to an extent as to render that product non-originating, or products in which working or processing carried out in settlements is cumulated with working or processing carried out in Israel?

Is the Commission aware that Israeli officials have been quoted as estimating that ‘as much as USD 2 billion of Israel's annual USD 7 billion exports to Europe’ (1) incorporates some material from settlements?

1

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(28 January 2004)

(28 January 2004)

The Israeli suggestion of indicating the place of production of goods being exported to the Community still needs to be further clarified by Israel before any conclusions can be drawn, for example as regards its possible effect on refusal by the national customs authorities of preferential tariff treatment.

One of the issues to be clarified would indeed be to know how the proposed scheme would be implemented, for example in the case of mixed consignments, which include both goods produced in the settlements and products obtained in the territory of the State of Israel.

The statement reported by the New York Times in May 2001 was never made to the Commission by Israeli officials.

---

(1)  ‘In meetings with European negotiators, Israeli officials have said that as much as USD 2 billion of Israel's annual USD 7 billion exports to Europe could be penalised by a policy change, as many Israeli manufactured goods incorporate some materials from settlement communities.’ EU Targets Goods Made in Israeli Settlements, William A. Orme Jr., New York Times, 22 May 2001.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 170 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 170

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the maximum age for 
 children eligible for medical care under the CHAMPVA program, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 13, 2015

  Mr. Tester (for himself, Mrs. Murray and Mr. Heller) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the maximum age for 
 children eligible for medical care under the CHAMPVA program, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``CHAMPVA Children's Care Protection 
Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE OF MAXIMUM AGE FOR CHILDREN ELIGIBLE FOR MEDICAL CARE 
              UNDER CHAMPVA PROGRAM.

    (a) Increase.--Subsection (c) of section 1781 of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c)(1) Notwithstanding clauses (i) and (iii) of section 101(4)(A) 
of this title and except as provided in paragraph (2), for purposes of 
this section, a child who is eligible for benefits under subsection (a) 
shall remain eligible for benefits under this section until the child's 
26th birthday, regardless of the child's marital status.
    ``(2) Before January 1, 2016, paragraph (1) shall not apply to a 
child who is eligible to enroll in an eligible employer-sponsored plan 
(as defined in section 5000A(f)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986).
    ``(3) This subsection shall not be construed to limit eligibility 
for benefits under subsection (a) of a child described in section 
101(4)(A)(ii) of this title.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Such subsection, as so amended, shall apply 
with respect to medical care provided on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Iteris, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Abbas Mohaddes, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/  ABBAS MOHADDES      |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Abbas  Mohaddes          |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |                     |
|   | October 30,  2009   |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or anyother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1667 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1667

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the special rules 
for accident and health plans of certain governmental entities, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 24, 2015

 Ms. Cantwell (for herself, Mr. Crapo, Ms. Klobuchar, and Mrs. Murray) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the special rules 
for accident and health plans of certain governmental entities, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF SPECIAL RULE FOR CERTAIN GOVERNMENTAL 
              PLANS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 105(j) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``the taxpayer'' and inserting ``a 
        qualified taxpayer'', and
            (2) by striking ``deceased plan participant's beneficiary'' 
        and inserting ``deceased employee's beneficiary (other than an 
        individual described in paragraph (3)(B))''.
    (b) Qualified Taxpayer.--Subsection (j) of section 105 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 
following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Qualified taxpayer.--For purposes of paragraph (1), 
        with respect to an accident or health plan described in 
        paragraph (2), the term `qualified taxpayer' means a taxpayer 
        who is--
                    ``(A) an employee, or
                    ``(B) the spouse, dependent (as defined for 
                purposes of subsection (b)), or child (as defined for 
                purposes of such subsection) of an employee.''.
    (c) Application to Political Subdivisions of States.--Paragraph (2) 
of section 105(j) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``or established by or on behalf of a 
        State or political subdivision thereof'' after ``public 
        retirement system'', and
            (2) by inserting ``or 501(c)(9)'' after ``section 115'' in 
        subparagraph (B).
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to payments after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
DOS 

e(~ 

~ ~ 

?Ip ~ ~p,.. 

24 

9 Dlffniwr 1952 ... 

W'AIXll roa m 1111J1S er USCD• 

M3eet.1 Cbqe 1n ... llabenld.p CID USCIB. 

!he cmel.o8ue 111 f'OIWlded tor intwU.cao 

USCDt 5/li16 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-07-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

RESTRICTED 
•itEW~H. 19Am'Mlm! r. B RAYi 

arnms " 1'BI CHDP or UVAL OIWIAflCllS 

W.ASHIRal'(ll 2s, o.c. 

hmt Cid.at or •m OperaU.ea 

Toa Dlraot.w ot emtral IaMdl'genoe 

MJs Rav • '......ad.p cm USCJB1 •mae 111 

lo let_.._ 1a _...to~ ot Detwe ....._.. ~ 4 ....._. 

1952, •.1eet; ID\8lt.ll I•l-.tat.icm ot acm Ro. 9 ledaetl. _ 

2. Toa &N acld.8e4 tbat,9 ett..U.n- l .0.. ..... 19529 a.a.. Amd.H1 Carl 

r. llPB. Dt.Not• ot lnal Iatelligmae, '411 --.. Uae ....., NPN-= 

em\at.1• an uscm. Y.le• a.. Adll1al Blabald P. 8'1'0U'l, a. 

la/ a. ., 0 Stoat 

Lr. sraJT 

a, cllreeU.m 

RESTRICTED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Energy Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                              |  |  |  |                   
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Asher E. Fogel                           |  |  |  |                   
|    |  | Asher E. Fogel                               |  |  |  | Dated: May 7, 2007
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer                      |  |  |  |                   
|    |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                |  |  |  |                   
|    |  |                                              | 
|By: |  | /s/ Richard J. Augustine                     |  |  |  |                   
|    |  | Richard J. Augustine                         |  |  |  | Dated: May 7, 2007
|    |  | Chief Accounting Officer                     |  |  |  |                   
|    |  | (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) |  |  |  |                   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to U.S. Energy Systems, Inc. and will be retained by U.S. Energy
Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
RAYMOND E. STAUFFER, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

BROOKS BROTHERS, INC

. AND RETAIL BRAND ALLIANCE, INC., Defendants

- Appellees,

AND

UNITED STATES, Intervenor

- Appellee.

______________________

2013

- 1180

______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New Y ork in No. 08

- CV

- 10369, Judge Sidney H. Stein.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________ O R D E R

Raymond E. Stauffer moves the court to accept the joint appendix for filing

. Case: 13-1180 Document: 72 Page: 1 Filed: 01/15/2014STAUFFER v. BROOKS BROTHERS
, INC

. 2

Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

The motion is granted. The joint appendix is accepted for filing.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s26 Case: 13-1180 Document: 72 Page: 2 Filed: 01/15/2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         521,631
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,367 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               521,631
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 524,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,552
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     502,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   524,998
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,248
<CGS>                                           20,065
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,817)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,817)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,817)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)
        

</TABLE>
|              |  |                
|------------- |  | ---------------
|CERTIFICATION |  | Exhibit (31)(2)



I, William T. Hanelly certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of C-COR Incorporated;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|      |  |                  |  |  |  |  |  |                                           
|----- |  | ---------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|      |  |                  |  | 
|Date: |  | November 3, 2004 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    WILLIAM T.
HANELLY                 
|      |  |                  |  |  |  |  |  | William T. Hanelly Chief Financial Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

# Cryptologic Machines Image Gallery

HomeHistoryNational Cryptologic MuseumExhibits & ArtifactsCryptologic MuseumMachines

Search

Search

                              - All Images 
                              - Design Elements 
                              - NSA Historical Photographs 
                              - Other 

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (1.6 MB)

Tags:machines

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery