alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
lCATlON Wanv) 

DISPOSITION FORM ~.ECRET 

FILE NO. 

~ef's ot Off'1ces and 

Staff Divisions 

I SUBJECT 

Digest of Staff Conference, 13 Jul1' 19511-

FROM c/s OATl.4 July 1954 COMMENT NO. 1 

Announced that persmmel departing on TDY overseas JJIJSt torva:td personal 

data, fat use Wile en TDY, to the NJ tar transmittal. v.la Courier Channels at 

least one week in advance ot departure. In the near future, a "check list" tor 

each overseas traveler will be issued by the NJ. This list v111 assist the 

tziaveler 8Dd the AG in preparing for each trip. Where material cannot be assembled 

until departure time, such material should be torvarded to the ID with a note ot 

explanation. 'fbe NJ will render special handling in such cases. 

2. SECtJRl'n' 

Requested that Chiefs of Offices and Sta.ff Divisions clear With the Chief', 

security: D1v19:1.on, the names ot personnel tor vb.cm TD? plans at' PCS orders are 

being initiated. . 

3. Dilijim'OR 

Commented on overseas travel: ''I~ to aee travel spread over 11 

months of the year; between 15 December and 15 January I eXpect our people to 

be heme. I vant the mex\~nn amount of travel from NSA to the field; the bes·t 

possible substitute for having been out in the f'ield is to visit JOQr caunterparts. I van.t more travel by ditterent people. I see to many repeat trips." 

General Canine read a letter from General ~ in reeard to the serlice 

test on the Voice Seczoecy Equipnent known as the AFSAY 806. He stated that the 

equipment had contributed appreciably to speeding up work on elassilied me.tte:.·s 

Which ordinarily would require cumbersome teletype transmission. Be aaded that 

his concm."n vaa how to get more equipments Vi.th a minimum delay. "I em happy 

that ve are finally conmenc1ng to get into the hands or the users at least 

service test models of the numerous pieces of hardware that ever,ybod:y has been 

dreaming about building and trying to caivert into service equiP'JlOO,t. 'J.'h1s is 

the second case now 1n a month or so in Which ve have 1leen put under considerable 

pressure. Those or YoU vtJO are in between the Agency and the users IJllBt be very 

carefUl. You must be ultra•conserva.t1ve in what you. promise these people. L0t 

me do the bragglng. I read this tor two purposes. one of them vaa that I wanted 

to tbrov a. bav to the Director of' R/D for a Job very vell done, a.Dd I bespeak 

consenatism by ell of you in our contacts with the users and particular~ vitb 

the high-powered users like the one at l.6oo Pennsylvania Avenue, and two, the 

Commnding General of the strategic Air c<mJIBlld.". 

eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 

5-28-2014 ursuantto E.O. 13526 

....
- -TM .•• pa .. 

.. , WI.JU• O. ltqd 

la'toJJ 

fld.o 

_. ... ...,.. 

··=·= == REP: ID :A59121 

-- I 

at>.r<m/.t 

e.lelt 909 

2 o JUN1951 

1 s-eter to ~ letter r8 30 A,pr1l. 1951. 1A wllieh 10ll 11m.t1cm 

\he .-a Of wueral ACl -.hen who had -1• BPP1toat1m foS" ~nt 1titb \Ill -1tlbo1l'tll'9 --1.~ wcard M te the Nlftllt., 

I Jaaw piq.4 nPl1ing t.o pg letter ~ receipt ot det.lled 

lntonnattm rl'Ol:l 9\11" ,Pel"IOllr.fll elt1ce. A1\boa&h 1t 19 not J!Mlllbl• 

to si"• 'lf'IG tu11 Mtail•,1 t .. .., Ula\ .. rRl'U!t.-nt. effort• ..,..,, !CA .-,.I".'*" DOt 1IMaen veq pJ'ocluct1Ye, .. fC"1 wUl el.90 

•onolwt•bai: datbt, .f'ra::\ ~ t.lMt hllcnd.'1!£ tabulation ot 

NIQlt• far1 

... J ·-.. 

Wi\h recud to 11Pec:ifio 1nd.1dduel• --4 Sa~ i.tter, •· ~rt. H. Mee ud lf'r .. PNderlck ft.Wt 4!d not tile ~f.eatlo1'1#1 _. U tbe7 cUd, the lettt!'J"IJ wvn Sap& e;t1")3 .,,...s&.t.J lfso. Wellaee c • .. S.• 9Cb.adul«t ...., er.ta an da\7 Oil as ,..., l9'1J .... , ... '· 

at.te.reon ad. Jlr, he!c tcaarenco ha-.. ban acce;.tied hut no tina1. ~ 

td.t=nt • w th•il" ow ot ~7 ea. da\.7 bu been Md• .. 18\1 -.17 

on9 itR>lloant, •· I.ttwie J. "'°'it.:: tlll'Md dam. "1e \broe who 

I.law bt.n .oeept.4 an tJ1D ..-o ~ la the \abttlat!on abaft .. l \h1Dk 191_!dll ~\bat \he retJ,pOnae to_. .rtorta ... I A.Cl 

'wsn h8l'dJ¥ "Waft"QZlt.a t!w .-nm\ ct ...it that. Illa\ be perfiicled. ill 

tll:mtaeta tt8tabll8hed vla t.1Jat oh.nllP.1. X "l"•t. 'ill' 1uldl.i t7 to ai't'e ...... loarable :report, whtcb 1• ~ed ~,.,. Jr:ta:r CPft IJal'Of'--

-tt•. "the ..,. UM J wish to tharik ,.,u rw 1f!lltr oooperation • 

Copy to: 

AFSA-14 

AFSA-15 

PIEASE RErURN TO AFSA-OOT 

........ l1"'"'•· 

William F. Friedman/ef/19 Jun 51 

AFSA-OOT, Erl. 60240 

roved for Release b NSA on 07-24-2013 ursuantto E .0. 1352
REF ID:~63250 

130RIS HAGELIN Zt~Nov.19.1962. 

lJoa.r Bill: I hn.ve to tlmnk you for two le Lters, 

Nov 11. 

of Oct 29 & 

It was .i.nterc•8ting to hear about N:tf;el's nnd i:>tus visit to your 

home, and about Stu's proi:;nosis re tho future. I ~Jhope tlmt 

lie is right. 

As to our timetable, we ex1)ect to go to Sweden on JJl~c •. 15. And 

hefore tltat we have our trip to Vieima, we len.ve on the 26th and 

expect to be bA.ck on Dec 3rd. 80 you might l>e able to cn.tcli us 

in ])Ptwnen these trips. 

As to your en'luiery re m. llenrion, I wrote to my friend Muller 

in .Pn.ris the s::ime cby I r,ot your letter, n.nd I shall write you 

again as soon as I have his answnr. N. is tl10 one mn.n in Paris 

who sl:ould he tl>le to got you the infori•iation re•~uired, n.nr1 who 

is also alwri.:)rs ready to clo whn.t he can for me •• 

We are very busy, and h::i.ve also a lot of peopll~ coming here-, on 

business. ;::Jo everytl1ing is us it sl10uJ.d be. I mn of course 

intPrested in the d.evelorment work, which we n.re irnlulging in to 

quite an extent, and which ± try to direct to the best of !TI'J 

ability. 

We have now fn.11 w0n,tlier, fogs and snow. 80 we would like to 

eet some stm, but this will hn.ve to wftit until Fe1)rtrn.ry next 

yen.r. 

We do hope tJ1n:L nJ.l 11:.i;s well with l·:lizeboth uncl your i:;nocl self, 

a.ml we send you our love and nffc1ctionntc regards, 

::lincorely 

·--- @'pp roved for Release by NSA on 08-15-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
. ... ...~ F·RITZE 

'HOVBOKHANDEL & KONSTHANDEL 

'8 3 7 .. !"''"''''''······························: 

Hm< i. FRITZES 

TELEFON 238900 .. 

.. POSTGIRO 193 

BANKGIRO 73-4015 . ; 

'. TG.~ .. , BOKFR!TZE •t :r)~~: .. _,·· , .. ,,_ . € 

! ......................................... [ Mr. William F. Friedman 

310 Second Street S.E. 

Washington 3 D.C. 

U S A
Mr. Arthur w. Uorton,. Jr. 

Bell 'rolepbolle I.aboratoriea, Inc. 

~ llill te.bo:ra.toq 

Murrq Rill,. Nev Jerse)" 

Dear Mr. Ho:rton t 

-

Thi& 1a to acknowledae your letter or 23 April l951J. 

1n regard to Mr~ n. s. Sha.Piro. Bi• qualitieatioos are very 

1nterestin8. l auggeat that you pt word. to him that it the 

peopJ.e at the lla.ll18t1e :Reeea.:rcb laboratory lack interest in 

ptti»g him uaigned to them to let ;you know. I think we would 

be intere•ted :ln him. 

8inceroly, 

\ 

'\ 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

It 

\' 

. I 

1 '• 

/\ 

' '
G 

REF ID:A6.8647~ __ 

(

- lllor' , -- ••• ilffitj;g:;;;· . 

.. ~ - ~~-~:- -·-~~~- -· -1 ~=------~_? __ --· er-

- &1,·b~ctJ ~.-~0•~19frt.ign ql pubj.!9 i.w ~ 

r,._ - ~et! security: Control Conauitant 17 March l9S2 · Divis on 

In accordance with AFSA Manorandu.m No. 120-18/l, certitioatLon that public 

law >lJ has been reviewed bJ' &U personnel assigned. to the Office ot the 

Consultant ia herewith submitted. 

· .... 

WILLIAM r. FRIEDMAN 

Conaultant 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-16-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of
Interactive Data Corporation (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Stuart J. Clark, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                              
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|                         |  | 
|Dated: February 28, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Stuart J. Clark          
|                         |  |  |  | Stuart J. Clark              
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                         |  |  |  | (principal executive officer)
Order entered September 24, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01206-CV

IN RE JAMES LATIMER, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-51478-2009

ORDER

Based on the Court’s order of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-29-1998  DEC-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-29-1998  DEC-29-1998
<CASH>                          2,672          2,672
<SECURITIES>                    0              0
<RECEIVABLES>                   1,849          1,849
<ALLOWANCES>                    0              0
<INVENTORY>                     62,060         62,060
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                69,709         69,709
<PP&E>                          29,883         29,883
<DEPRECIATION>                  0              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  106,213        106,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           53,339         53,339 
<BONDS>                         20,403         20,403
<COMMON>                        0              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0              0  
<PREFERRED>                     0              0      
<OTHER-SE>                      13,582         13,582
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    106,213        106,213
<SALES>                         290,359        80,790
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                290,359        80,790
<CGS>                           226,642        63,207 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   226,642        63,207 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                59,485         15,635 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              6,282          1,741
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (2,435)        (178)  
<INCOME-TAX>                    0              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (2,435)        (178)  
<DISCONTINUED>                  0              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 1,309          0     
<CHANGES>                       0              0      
<NET-INCOME>                    (1,126)        (178)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (0.12)         (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.12)         (0.01)
        


</TABLE>
F-Disp-4(rev 9/06)

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION JOSEPH H. ORLANDO

 CLERK

 JOHN K. GRANT DEPUTY CLERK

 MARIE C. HANLEY CHIEF COUNSEL

RICHARD J. HUGHES JUSTICE 

COMPLEX

P.O. BOX 006

TRENTON, NEW JERSEY 08625-0006

(609) 292-4822

DATE: August 9, 2017

TO: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

TITLE: STATE V. JOSHUA J. GIBSON

DOCKET: NO. A-003305-15T4

OPINION FILED: July 11, 2017

Dear Counsel:

The opinion filed in the above matter was found to need typographical, grammatical or 

substantive change(s). As a consequence, at the direction of the court, please substitute the 

enclosed copy of the opinion. If you have any questions, please contact the Clerk's Office at 

609-984-0885.

On Page 5, Lines 3-6 should be revised to read as follows:

We apply the same standard as the trial court, and review its decision de novo. Waters, 

supra, 439 N.J. Super. at 226. We must hew to that standard of review.

JOSEPH H. ORLANDO

CLERK

Enclosure(s)

cc: WestGroup

 Lexis/Nexis
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 96-60587

____________________

MANNO ELECTRIC, INC.; PETITIONERS-CROSS-RESPONDENTS

JACK L. MANNO, SR.

versus

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS RESPONDENT-CROSS-PETITIONER

BOARD

__________________________________________________

Petition for Review of an Order 

of the National Labor Relations Board

(15-CA-11891)

__________________________________________________

September 8, 1997

Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

The petition for review is DENIED and the Board’s order is to

be ENFORCED. See Local Rule 47.6. Respondent’s motion for

reimbursement copying costs is GRANTED.
# CE2004078EN.01055101.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/551 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/551

---

(2004/C 78 E/0586)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3453/03

by Philip Claeys (NI) to the Commission

(20 November 2003)

Subject:   Political position adopted by EU officials' trade union TAO-AFI on night flights over outlying districts of Brussels

Subject:

At the beginning of November the EU officials' trade union TAO-AFI adopted a public position on night flights from Zaventem airport. Controversy has been raging for months on the Belgian political scene as to which communes the flight paths in question should pass over. It might be possible to reach consensus by means of a distribution plan which shares the nuisance caused by night flights among various parts of the periphery of Brussels and the adjoining communes. Evidently the officials' trade union has a relatively large number of members living in the residential communes to the east of Brussels, and objects to the possibility that the area in question might also have to bear a share of the nuisance. The union argues, inter alia, that rents are high in these communes and that many people went to live there at a time when there was no suggestion that Zaventem airport might cause noise at night.

TAO-AFI's intervention has annoyed residents of the periphery of Brussels who consider that some solidarity should be displayed in sharing the inconvenience caused by the proximity of Zaventem airport. All this is doing nothing to promote the image of the European institutions in Brussels.

Is it normal and desirable that a trade union representing European officials should adopt such controversial positions in public?

Has the matter been discussed with TAO-AFI? If so, what were the conclusions?

Answer given by Mr Kinnock on behalf of the Commission

(13 January 2004)

(13 January 2004)

The decision of trade unions and staff associations in the Institutions to express views on matters of public interest and concern are solely the responsibility of the organisations. Obviously, therefore, those organisations do not speak on behalf of the Commission.

The Commission has not discussed the issue of night flights to and from Zaventem airport with the organisation referred to in the question or with any other staff union or association.

---
# CE2004084EN.01084601.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/846 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/846

---

(2004/C 84 E/0939)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0694/04

by Paulo Casaca (PSE) to the Commission

(9 March 2004)

Subject:   Auditing the Commission's external activity

Subject:

Point 61 of EP report A5-0040/2004 calls on the Internal Audit Service (IAS) to make an assessment of the legality and regularity of contracts made and subsidies granted by these [sic] services.

Can the Commission confirm whether funding carried out by the EDF is included in the contracts which are going to be audited by the IAS under this point?

Answer given by Mr Kinnock on behalf of the Commission

(15 April 2004)

(15 April 2004)

The Internal Audit Service (IAS) is currently finalising its audit of the Europe Aid and Co-operation Office (AIDCO) Directorate-General in line with the objectives of the Reform White Paper.

One of the objectives of the audit was the examination of the AIDCO financial circuits for commitments and payments for European Development Funds (EDF) resources, made after the entry into force of the new 9th EDF Financial Regulation and within the effective devolution framework. The non-devolved delegations were not specifically addressed and the parameters were also set so as to avoid duplication with the ongoing separate but parallel evaluation of the devolution process.

---
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 2 1

- 1468

FRANK SCOTT DABNEY; KATHRYN HARRELLE DABNEY , Debtors

– Appellants ,

v. BANK OF AMERICA, NA; SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING; BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON; SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC , Defendants

– Appellees , and
JAMES M. WYMAN , Trustee

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. Bruce H. Hendricks , District Judge. ( 2:19

- cv - 03225

- BHH )

Submitted : October 28, 2022 Decided : December 27, 2022

Before WYNN and DIAZ , Circuit Judges, and KEENAN , Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Robert B. Varnado, VARNADO LAW FIRM, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellants. Nathan J. Taylor, MCGUIREWOODS LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees Bank of America, N.A. and Bank of New York Mellon. Graham USCA4 Appeal: 21-1468 Doc: 50 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 1 of 32 Mitchell, NELSON MULLINS, Columbi a, South Carolina, for Appellee Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC. Damon C. Wlodarczyk, RILEY POPE & LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-1468 Doc: 50 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 2 of 33 PER C URIAM: Frank and Kathryn Dabney appeal the district court ’s order affirming a bankruptcy

court order . The bankruptcy court grant ed the joint motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing and Bank of New York Mellon and the joint motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC and Bank of America, N.A

. We have reviewed th e record and find no error in the bankruptcy court ’ s decision.
See In re Frushour , 433 F.3d 393, 398 (4th Cir. 2005) (noting that, in an appeal from the district court sitting as an appellate court from a bankruptcy court, we “review directly the bankruptc y court ’ s decision”). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 21-1468 Doc: 50 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
BORIS -GELIN REF ID:A22632jQ 

Fryk<..14£,:, Orsa, ,!u3.23,53 

·.-

De·-~r-Dill: 

I wrote SODE 

~~,· 

~-·+-··. birn\ to my 3elglan friend, 

van Dye.k's rn::inuscrlrt, I was ofr~Jid th.::it 1 t . · 

mi3ht h:=ive 3one astray.· I h·ive now his reply, 

wi~h your. sh~e~, which I asked to 3et returned. 

Ky friend wrttes thnt in order to t-tW-l'Er'stand 

the text prorsrly, he hAs had it transl3ted int< 

moderri Flemish. He is working on the solution, 

but as yet without success. He thinks that it i[ 

a simple subs':.itutiO'' cir1her, but crn the cipher 

p~ssa5es are so short, ana concern diCfernt 

subjects, it, is not easy to worl: with !:-rob:ib1e 

worcJ s. 

AnhyhoH, I shn11 be hu·rin·3 from him l::iter. 

~lith be~t-re::;rirds, 

Sincerely 

--h-1-~ 

t • - ~ - _.,, <. •-;:., ,. •
From: Jim Stephenson To: Hart, Brent (FAA) Subject: Re: Aero Sports Connection Exemption No. 9785D Date: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 11:34:26 AM


### Thank you.

Jim Stephenson ASC CEO/President

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 6, 2016, at 9:27 AM, < Brent.Hart@faa.gov > < Brent.Hart@faa.gov > wrote:

Hello Mr. Stephenson,

I will bring this to the attention of Flight Standards. My apologies for not getting that request addressed.

Thanks,
Brent Hart FAA Office of Rulemaking

From: kimojim@aol.com [ mailto:kimojim@aol.com ] Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 1:34 PM To: Hart, Brent (FAA) Subject: Re: Aero Sports Connection Exemption No. 9785D


### Mr. Hart,

Thank you so much Mr. Hart. We needed the extension and appreciate it.

We had also requested a specific definition for "foot launch" for this exemption only. A definition is not provided in either 14CFR1 or 14CFR103. We understand that such additions are not always easy and therefore thank you for the extension, anyway. Perhaps field ASI difficulties will not be as extensive as they have been in the past.

Sincerely,

James G. Stephenson ASC president/CEO 269-209-1466-----Original Message----- From: Brent.Hart < Brent.Hart@faa.gov > To: kimojim < kimojim@aol.com > Sent: Wed, Nov 30, 2016 12:53 pm Subject: Aero Sports Connection Exemption No. 9785D

Hello Mr. Stephenson,

Attached is the renewed Exemption 9785, as amended. You will receive the original in the mail, and this will also be posted on regulations.gov

.

Thanks,
Brent Hart FAA Office of Rulemaking FAA HQ
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MEDGAR SAMUEL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1673

[December 7, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Samantha Schosberg 

Feuer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2007-CF-005216-AXXX-MB.

Medgar Samuel, Lake City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, LEVINE and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.