UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

WASHINGTON, DC 

Regulatory Docket No. _

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION OF:

Thomas Hall

FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF

TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS

SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(l),

91.409(a)(l) & (a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL

OPERATION OF DJI PHANTOM 2 VISION+ AND DJI INSPIRE 1 UNMANNED

AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS

PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF

THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012

<PUBLIC LAW 112-95) 

Submitted on April 14, 2015 

Thomas Hall

 850 Caroline Street 

 Billings, MT 59105 

 406-694-3584
2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................... 3

SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ 4

INIRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF PETITIONER .................................................... 4

BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 4

BASIS FOR PETITION ......................................................................................................... 5

NAME AND ADDRESS OF PETITIONER ............................................................. 7

THE SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF 14 C.F.R. FROM WHICH THOMAS HALL

SEEKS EXEMPTION .................................................................... 8 

THE EXTENT OF RELIEF Thomas Hall SEEKS AND THE REASON

THOMAS HALL SEEKS THE RELIEF .................................... 11

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING THOMAS HALL’S REQUEST

WOULD BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ............................................................ 15

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING THE EXEMPTION WOULD NOT 

ADVERSELY AFFECT SAFETY .......................................................................... 19

SUMMARY THAT CAN BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER ....... 34

ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, VIEWS, OR ARGUMENTS

AVAILABLE TO SUPPORT THOMAS HALL’S 

REQUEST.........................................................................34

CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................................... 35

APPENDICES .......................................................................................................................... 37
3

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS

AGL

AOI 

ATC

ATO

AV 

CFR 

COA

FAA

FAR

GCS

GPS 

LOL

NAS

NOTAM

PIC

Section 333

 SO 

SOP 

UA

UAS 

VFR

VLOS 

VMC

VTOL

Above Ground Level

Area of Interest

Air Traffic Control 

Air Traffic Organization

Aerial Vehicle 

Code of Federal Regulations

Certificate of Authorization

Federal Aviation Administration

Federal Aviation Regulation

Ground Control Station

Global Positioning System

Loss of Link

National Airspace System

Notice to Airman 

Pilot In Command

FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333 

Safety Observer 

Standard Operating Procedures

Unmanned Aircraft 

Unmanned Aircraft System

Visual Flight Rules

Visual Line of Site

Visual Meteorological Conditions

Vertical Takeoff and Landing 
4

SUMMARY 

Thomas Hall seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & 

(b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.lSl(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(l), 91.409(a)(l) & (a)

(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System pursuant to Section 

333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA). This exemption will

permit Thomas Hall to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for the commercial 

purpose of conducting aerial video and photography of construction sites, real estate, and 

landscape over certain areas of the United States. 

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE PETITIONER

Thomas Hall provides his clients with expertise and knowledge in advanced 

technologies and solutions to increase efficiency, productivity and effectiveness. Thomas 

Hall has over 10 years of professional experience in project management and Land 

Surveying. He has over 6 years recreational/hobby experience in all aspects of aerial video 

and photography. The objective of Thomas Hall aerial video and photography operations 

is to provide high quality imaging for a variety of commercial, public, and residential uses, 

specifically targeting: 

• Construction sites before and after 

• Appraisals

• Real-estate marketing 

• Aerial acquisitions used for inspections of public and private structures.

• Aerial Mapping/Land Surveying
5

BACKGROUND 

Unmanned Aircraft Systems: DJI Phantom 2 Vision+. DJI Inspire 1 UASs

Thomas Hall seeks an exemption to operate DJI systems for compensation or hire 

within the NAS. The DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 are vertical takeoff and 

landing (VTOL) Unmanned Aircraft (UA) with a Ground Control Station (GCS) utilizing 

electronic tablet, laptop or smart phone systems. The DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ has a

maximum gross weight of approximately 2 pounds 11 ounces, while having a length of 16 

inches width of 16 inches, height of 8 inches, and a maximum speed of approximately 29

knots. The DJI Inspire 1 has a maximum gross weight of 6 pounds 7.5 ounces, a length of

17.3 inches, width of 17.7 inches, height of 11.8 inches, and a maximum speed of

approximately 42 knots. The DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs are equipped

with four main rotors; driven by Lithium Polymer battery powered electric motors.

The DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs that will be operated by 

Thomas Hall will be registered in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 44103, Registration of

Aircraft, as well as 14 C.F.R Part 47, Aircraft Registration, and marked in accordance

with 14C.F.R. Part 45, Identification and Registration Marking.

BASIS FOR PETITION

Petitioner, Thomas Hall, pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Aviation 

Regulations (14 C.F.R. § 11.61) and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 

(FMRA), Section 333, Special Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems, hereby 

petitions the Administrator to commercially operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision 

+, DJI Inspire 1 UASs in the National Airspace System (NAS), and for an exemption

from the
6

Requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91. lSl(b), 91.405(a),

91.407(a)(l), 91.409(a)(l) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

In consideration of the speed, weight, size, and limited operating area associated

with the unmanned aircraft and its operation, Thomas Hall’s operation of DJI Phantom 2 

Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs meets the conditions of FMRA Section 333 and 

therefore, will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 

21, Subpart H.

Accordingly, Thomas Hall requests relief from Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(l), 

91.409(a)(l ) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), as these sections set forth requirements for 

maintenance that only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. 

Thomas Hall submits that the requested relief is proper since an equivalent level 

of safety will be ensured. Thomas Hall will use experienced personnel or technicians to 

perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UASs using the 

methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., Monthly 

Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual). 

Furthermore, Thomas Hall will document and maintain all maintenance records for the 

DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs. 

Relief from certain requirements of Section 61.113(a) and (b), entitled Private pilot

privileges and limitations: Pilot in command, is requested by Thomas Hall to the extent 

necessary to allow a Pilot in Command (PIC) holding a private pilot or higher level

certificate, as well as an airman medical certificate, and who has demonstrated, by meeting

minimum flight- hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the

DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs in a manner consistent with this 
7

exemption,including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate

distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

Thomas Hall seeks relief from Section 91.7(a), entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, 

because the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs do not require an 

airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. As such,

Thomas Hall submits that he will ensure that the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 

1 UAS’s are in an airworthy condition, prior to every flight, by determining that the UASs 

are in compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI 

Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual), and that the aircraft are in a 

condition for safe flight. 

Thomas Hall also seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.121, 

entitled Altimeter Settings, as the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs will not 

have a typical barometric altimeter onboard. However, altitude information of the DJI 

Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1UAs will be provided to the PIC via Global

Positioning System (GPS) equipment and radio communications telemetry data link, 

which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of the flight path. This

altitude information, combined with Thomas Hall's operation of the DJI Phantom 2 

Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs within visual line of sight, at or below 500 feet AGL,

will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. 

Additionally, Thomas Hall seeks an exemption from the requirements of 

Section 91.15l(b), entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions. Thomas 

Hall submits that safety will not be affected by operation of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ 

and DJI Inspire 1 UAS’ during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions 

(VMC)
8

under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of

approximately 13.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal

cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes.

In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, Thomas Hall provides the following

information in support of its petition for exemption:

A. Name And Address Of The Petitioner.

The name and address of the Petitioner and point of contact is:

Thomas Hall

850 Caroline Street,

Billings, MT 59105 

406-694-3584 

Email: 

ecstomh@gmail.com

B. The Specific Sections Of 14 C.F.R. From Which Thomas Hall Seeks

Exemption.

1.Thomas Hall Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 

61.113(a) And (b).

Section 61.113, entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command,

subsections (a) and (b) prescribe the following, in relevant part:

(a) No person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in command

(PIC) of an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or

hire; nor may that person, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft.

(b) A private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in

connection with any business or employment if-

(1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and

(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

2.Thomas Hall Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 

91.7(a).
9

Section 91.7, entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, subsection (a), states the

following: 

(a) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in an airworthy condition. 

3. Thomas Hall Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121.

Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, subsection (a), states the following, in

part: 

(a) Each person operating an aircraft shall maintain the cruising altitude or flight

level of that aircraft, as the case may be, by reference to an altimeter that is set,

when operating--

(1) Below 18,000 feet MSL, to-- 

(i) The current reported altimeter setting of a station along the route and

within 100 nautical miles of the aircraft; 

(ii) If there is no station within the area prescribed in paragraph (a)( l)(i) 

of this section, the current reported altimeter setting of an appropriate

available station; or

(iii) In the case of an aircraft not equipped with a radio, the elevation of the

departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before 

departure. 

4. Thomas Hall Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 

91.151(b).

Section 91.151, entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, subsection

(b), states the following: 

(b) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless

(considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to 

fly to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, 

to fly after that for at least 20 minutes.

5. Thomas Hall Seeks Exemption From The Requirement Of Section 

91.405(a).
1

Section 91.405, entitled Maintenance required, subsection (a), states the following:

Each owner or operator of an aircraft-

(a) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall

between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this 

section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter[.]

6. Thomas Hall Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 

91.407(a)(l)

Section 91.407, entitled Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance,

rebuilding, or alteration, subsection (a)(l), states the following: 

(a) No person may operate any aircraft that has undergone maintenance, preventive

maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless--

(1)It has been approved for return to service by a person authorized under §

43.7 of this chapter[.]

7. Thomas Hall Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 

91.409(a)(l) And 91.409(a)(2).

Section 91.409, entitled Inspections, subsection (a), states the following:

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may operate an

aircraft unless, within the preceding 12 calendar months, it has had --

(1)An annual inspection in accordance with part 43 of this chapter and has

been approved for return to service by a person authorized by § 43.7 of this

chapter; or

(2)An inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate in accordance

with part 21 of this chapter.

8. Thomas Hall Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 

91.417(a) And 91.417(b).

Section 91.417, entitled Maintenance records, subsections (a) and (b), state the

following: 

(a) Except for work performed in accordance with §§ 91.411 and 91.413, each 

registered owner or operator shall keep the following records for the periods

specified in paragraph (b) of this section:
1

(1)Records of the maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration and

records of the 100-hour, annual, progressive, and other required or approved

inspections, as appropriate, for each aircraft (including the airframe) and

each engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance of an aircraft. The records must

include--

(i)A description (or reference to data acceptable to the Administrator) of

the work performed; and

(ii) The date of completion of the work performed; and

(iii) The signature, and certificate number of the person approving the

aircraft for return to service.

(2)Records containing the following information:

(i) The total time in service of the airframe, each engine, each propeller, and

each rotor.

(ii) The current status of life-limited parts of each airframe, engine,

propeller, rotor, and appliance.

(iii) The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the aircraft which

are required to be overhauled on a specified time basis.

(iv) The current inspection status of the aircraft, including the time since the

last inspection required by the inspection program under which the

aircraft and its appliances are maintained.

(v) The current status of applicable airworthiness directives (AD) and safety

directives including, for each, the method of compliance, the AD or

safety directive number and revision date. If the AD or safety directive

involves recurring action, the time and date when the next action is

required.

(vi) Copies of the forms prescribed by § 43.9(d) of this chapter for each 

major alteration to the airframe and currently installed engines, rotors,

propellers, and appliances.

(b) The owner or operator shall retain the following records for the periods

prescribed:

(1) The records specified in paragraph (a)( l) of this section shall be retained

until the work is repeated or superseded by other work or for 1 year after the

work is performed. 
1

(2)The records specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be retained

and transferred with the aircraft at the time the aircraft is sold.

(3)A list of defects furnished to a registered owner or operator under § 43.11 of

this chapter shall be retained until the defects are repaired and the aircraft is

approved for return to service. 

C. The Extent Of Relief Thomas Hall Seeks And The Reason Thomas Hall Seeks The Relief.

1.Extent Of Relief Thomas Hall Seeks And The Reason Thomas Hall 

Seeks Relief From Section 61.113(a) And (b).

Relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) entitled Private pilot privileges and 

limitations: Pilot in command, is requested to the extent necessary to allow a PIC holding a

private pilot or higher level certificate, as well as a current and valid airman medical

certificate, and who has met certain flight-hour and currency requirements, to conduct the

proposed UAS flight operations for compensation or hire.

This relief is requested since the limitations set forth in Section 61.113(a) and (b)

state that a private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in

connection with any business or employment if: (1) The flight is only incidental to that

business or employment; and (2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for

compensation or hire.

As set forth more fully below, Thomas Hall submits that an equivalent level of 

safety will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 2 

Vision+ UAS or DJI Inspire 1 UAS unless that PIC has met certain flight-hour and 

currency requirements, demonstrating that the PIC is able to safely operate either the DJI 

Phantom 2 Vision+ or DJI Inspire 1 UAS in a manner consistent with the operations

specifications as described in this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers,

as well as maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.
1

Further, Thomas Hall submits that all flights of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision

+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, conducted by the PIC pursuant to the grant of this Petition: (1)

will be incidental to Thomas Hall's business; and (2) will not carry passengers or property 

for compensation or hire.

2. Extent Of Relief Thomas Hall Seeks And The Reason Thomas Hall 

Seeks Relief From Section 91.7(a).

Relief from Section 91.7(a) entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, is requested to the

extent required to allow Thomas Hall to determine that the DJI Phantom 2 Vision

+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs are in airworthy condition prior to every flight by ensuring that

the UAS is in compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, 

and DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual). 

Thomas Hall seeks the requested relief because the DJI Phantom 2 Vision 

+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs do not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14

C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Therefore, Thomas Hall will ensure that the DJI Phantom 2 

Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAS’s are in airworthy condition based upon its compliance 

with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ 

and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual) prior to every flight, and further, determine that the 

aircraft are in condition for safe flight, as stated in the conditions and 

Limitations Of Relief Thomas Hall Seeks And The Reason Thomas Hall Seeks 

Relief From Section 91.121.

Relief from Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, may be required to allow

flight operations of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, which utilize a

barometric pressure sensor, GPS equipment, and a radio communications telemetry data 

link to downlink altitude information from the UA to the PIC at the ground control station
1

(GCS). Since the FAA requires that any altitude information concerning UAS operations be

reported to air traffic control (ATC) in feet above ground level (AGL), Thomas Hall seeks 

the requested relief because the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UA's altimeter 

may be set on the ground to zero feet AGL, rather than the local barometric pressure or 

field altitude, before each flight.

Considering the limited altitude of the proposed operations, relief from 14 CFR

91.121 is sought to the extent necessary to comply with the applicable conditions and

limitations stated below. As more fully set forth herein, an equivalent level of safety will

be maintained since the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs are equipped with a

barometric pressure sensor and GPS equipment, which automatically ensures that a ground

level pressure setting will be established prior to each flight, and provides the PIC with

altitude information of the UA on the heads-up display of the GCS.

4. Extent Of Relief Thomas Hall Seeks And The Reason Thomas Hall 

Seeks Relief From Section 91.lSl(b).

Relief from Section 91.15l(b) entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR

conditions, is requested to the extent required to allow flights of the battery powered DJI

Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs during daylight hours in visual meteorological

conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), for a total duration of 13.5 minutes to

the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for

at least 4.5 minutes. Thomas Hall seeks the requested relief because without an exemption 

from Section 91.151(b), the flight time duration of the battery powered DJI Phantom 2 

Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs will severely constrain the practicality of any aerial video or 

still photo flight operations that Thomas Hall proposes to conduct pursuant to this Petition. 
1

Significantly, as set forth below, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 2

Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 operating

documents, and Thomas Hall's proposed operating limitations, ensure that Thomas Hall 

will safely operate the battery powered DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs 

during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules 

(VFR), with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 13.5 minutes to the first 

point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 

4.5 minutes. 

5. Extent Of Relief Thomas Hall Seeks And The Reason Thomas Hall 

Seeks Relief From Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(l), 91.409(a)(l) & 

(a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b).

Since Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(l), 91.409(a)(l) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b)

only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, Thomas Hall requests relief from 

these Sections because the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs do not require 

airworthiness certificates. As set forth more fully below, the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and 

DJI Inspire 1 UASs meet the conditions of FMRA Section 333 for operation without an 

airworthiness certificate. Accordingly, Thomas Hall to perform maintenance, alterations, 

or preventive maintenance on the UASs using the methods, techniques, and practices 

prescribed in the UAS operating documents (i.e., the Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI 

Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual). Furthermore, Thomas Hall will 

document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI 

Inspire 1 UAS’s. 

D.The Reasons Why Granting Thomas Hall Request Would Be In The Interest; 

That Is, How It Would Benefit The Public As A Whole.
1

Granting the present Petition will further the public interest by allowing Thomas 

Hall to safely, efficiently, and economically perform aerial video and photography of 

construction sites, real estate, and landscape over certain areas of the United States.

Additionally, use of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAS’s will

decrease congestion of the NAS, reduce pollution, and provide significant benefits to

the economy. Notably, the benefits of Thomas Hall's proposed operation of the

DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs will be realized without implicating any

privacy issues.

1.The Public Will Benefit From Decreased Congestion Of The NAS.

The DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs are battery powered and serve

as a safe, efficient, and economical alternative to the manned aircraft traditionally utilized

to obtain aerial imagery. By reducing the amount of manned aircraft needed to perform

aerial acquisitions, an exemption allowing the use of a DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ or DJI 

Inspire 1 UAS would reduce the amount of manned aircraft in the NAS, reduce noise and

air pollution, as well as increase the safety of life and property in the air and on the 

ground.

Furthermore, by reducing the number of manned aircraft operating in the NAS,

congestion around airports caused by arriving and departing aircraft will be reduced. The

DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAS’s do not require an airport to takeoff or 

land. Likewise, a reduction of manned aircraft conducting aerial video and photography

missions would result in fewer aircraft that must be handled by air traffic control during

the ground, takeoff, departure, arrival, and landing phases of flight operations. 

2. The Public Will Benefit From The Safety And Efficiency Of The DJI

Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs.
1

Conducting aerial acquisitions with the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1

UASs, instead of manned aircraft, will greatly benefit the public by drastically reducing the

levels of air and noise pollution generated during traditional aerial video and still

photography flight operations. By using battery power and electric motors, the DJI

Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs produce no air pollution, and is the most

viable environmentally conscious alternative to the cabin class, six cylinder internal

combustion engine aircraft that are typically utilized for aerial video and photography,

while burning approximately 20-30 gallons per hour of leaded aviation fuel. The DJI

Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs, while reducing the carbon footprint of aerial

acquisitions, also eliminates noise pollution, as the UAs are propelled by battery powered

electric motors, rather than an internal combustion engine. 

By using the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs to perform aerial

acquisitions, the substantial risk to life and property in the air and on the ground, which is

usually associated with traditional manned aircraft flight operations, will be substantially

reduced or completely eliminated. Aside from the lack of flight crew members located

onboard the aircraft, the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs (weighing

approximately 2 pounds 11 ounces and 6 pounds 7.5 ounces respectively, at their

maximum gross weights with lengths of 16 inches and 17.3 inches respectively, widths of

16 inches and 17.7 inches respectively, and with no fuel on board), has less physical

potential for collateral damage to life and property on the ground, and in the air, compared

to the manned aircraft that typically conduct similar operations (weighing approximately

6,000 pounds with a wingspan of approximately 42 feet, a length of 34 feet, and a fuel

capacity of 180 gallons).
1

3. Performing Aerial Video and Photography Operations With The DJI

Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1UASs Will Benefit The Economy.

In addition to being safe and efficient, the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire

1 UASs are also an economical alternative to using manned aircraft to conduct similar

aerial operations. As such, operation of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1

UASs will allow United States based companies, like Thomas Hall’s, to remain

competitive and contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Specifically, with the rising

cost of aviation fuel and the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") regulatory actions 

Phasing out leaded aviation fuels, U.S. owned and operated companies must adopt new and

alternative technology in order to remain competitive. Operating the battery powered DJI

Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs is one such technology that not only allows

companies greater operational flexibility compared to manned aircraft, but provides such

flexibility without the high operational cost of a traditional manned aircraft. 

By operating the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAS’s, companies such

as Thomas Hall’s, can remain competitive and profitable, and therefore, provide greater job 

stability to employees and contractors, which will ultimately contribute to growth of the 

U.S. economy. Improved financial performance of U.S. companies, through commercial 

use of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, provides a stable workforce 

that increases consumer spending; improves local, state, and federal tax revenues; and 

allows companies to invest in research and development in order to remain competitive 

both in the United States and abroad.

4.There Are No Privacy Issues.

Similar to the manned aerial acquisition flight operations that have been conducted for

decades, Thomas Hall's proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI 
1

Inspire 1 UASs will not implicate any privacy issues. Specifically, the DJI Phantom 2 

Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs will be operated only in compliance with operating

documents (i.e., the Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI 

Inspire 1 Instruction Manual)

which requires property owner involvement as well as local law enforcement notification, 

and in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations, including the minimum altitude 

requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 91.119.

E. The Reasons Why Granting The Exemption Would Not Adversely Affect Safety,

Or How The Exemption Would Provide A Level Of Safety At Least Equal To That

Provided By The Rule From Which Thomas Hall Seeks Exemption.

1.Reasons Why The DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs Meet 

The Conditions Of The FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 

(FMRA) Section 333.

In consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated

with the unmanned aircraft and its operation, Thomas Hall operation of the DJI Phantom 

2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs meet the conditions of FMRA Section 333, and will 

not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H.

Section 333 provides authority for a UAS to operate without airworthiness

certification and sets forth requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a

hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security.

Specifically, FMRA Section 333 states the following, in part:

(a)In General.--Notwithstanding any other requirement of this subtitle, and not

later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of

Transportation shall determine i f certain unmanned aircraft systems may

operate safely in the national airspace system before completion of the plan

and rulemaking required by section 332 of this Act or the guidance required by

section 334 of this Act.
20

(b)Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.--In making the determination under

subsection (a), the Secretary shall determine, at a minimum--

(1)which types of unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their

size, weight, speed, operational capability, proximity to airports and

populated areas, and operation within visual line of sight do not create

a hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public or pose 

a threat to national security; and

(2) whether a certificate of waiver, certificate of authorization, or

airworthiness certification under section 44704 of title 49, United States 

Code, is required for the operation of unmanned aircraft systems

identified under paragraph (1).

(c) Requirements for Safe Operation.--lf the Secretary determines under this

section that certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the

national airspace system, the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe

operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.

In seeking this exemption, Thomas Hal submits that the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ 

and DJI Inspire 1 UAS’s can operate safely in the NAS pursuant to FMRA Section 333, as 

demonstrated by: (a) the characteristics of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 

UASs; (b) the pilot certification requirement; and (c) the specific operating limitations.

a. The Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1

UASs Demonstrate Its Safe Characteristics.

The DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs do not create a hazard to 

users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security considering 

its size, weight, speed, and operational capability.

i. Technical Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI

Inspire 1 UASs.

The technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs 

are set forth by the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 Specifications and Data 

Sheet, attached hereto as Exhibit A and B.
21

ii The DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs Autonomous

Flight And Navigation Modes Enable The UASs To Remain Within

A Defined Operational Area.

The DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs may be operated in both

manual and fully autonomous flight modes. A complete description of the flight and

navigational modes of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs is provided at

pages 25-35 of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and pages 12-16 and 45-50 of the DJI Inspire 1

User Manuals, attached hereto as Exhibit C and D.

iii.The DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1UASs Are Designed

For Automatic Return To Home Point Or Hover In The Event Of

Loss Of The Control Link Or Navigation.

When the Control Link is lost, the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAS’s

will remain stationary, in flight, for 3 seconds or more. If, after 3 seconds, the DJI 

Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAS’s do not reacquire control link data from the 

GCS, the UAs will assume that the Control Link is lost and the UAs will return to the home 

position (i.e., failsafe mode) via GPS, and will descend to the takeoff position and 

shutdown. 

A complete description of the Failsafe Functions of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+

UAS are set forth at pages 27 through 29 and for the DJI Inspire 1 at pages 13 through 15 

of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 User Manuals, attached hereto as Exhibit

C and D.

iv. The DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1GCS And Its

Operation.

A complete description of the operation and specifications of the DJI Phantom 2

Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 GCS and flight control software is provided at pages 32 through

43 of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ User Manual and pages 40 through 47 of the DJI Inspire
22

1 User Manual. DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1User Manuals are attached

hereto as Exhibits C and D.

b. Flight Operations Of DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs

Are Limited To The Line Of Sight Of A Certificated Pilot in Command

With A Safety Observer.

Thomas Hall will only utilize certificated pilots who possess a current and valid 

airman medical certificate to act as a pilot in command (PIC) of the DJI Phantom 2

Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs. Additionally, a safety observer will assist all pilots

during flight time.

c. Flights Of DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs Will Be 

Conducted Pursuant To Specific Operating Limitations.

In seeking this exemption, Thomas Hall proposes to commercially operate DJI 

Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs for the special purpose of conducting aerial 

video and photography over certain areas of United States, pursuant to the following 

specific operating limitations: 

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption will be limited to the following

aircraft described in the operating documents, rotorcraft UASs weighing less

than 55 pounds maximum gross weight: DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire

1 Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will

require a new petition or a petition to amend this grant. 

2. UAS operations under this exemption will be limited to conducting operations

for the purpose of aerial video and photography. 

3. The UAs may not be flown at an indicated airspeed exceeding 20 knots.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 500 feet above ground

level (AGL), as indicated by the procedures specified in the operating

documents unless a special request is made and approved by ATC. All altitudes

reported to ATC must be in feet AGL. 

S. The UAS’s must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all

times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any 

device other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC's FAA-issued airman

medical certificate. 
23

6. The use of first person view (FPV) by the PIC or safety observer (SO) is not

permitted.

7. All operations must utilize a safety observer (SO). The SO may be used to satisfy

the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability.

The SO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times. Electronic

messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC must be

designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the

duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the SO can perform the

Functions prescribed in the operating documents.

8. The SO must not perform any other duties beyond assisting the PIC with seeing

and avoiding other air traffic and other ground based obstacles/obstructions and

is not permitted to operate the camera or other instruments.

9. The operating documents and the grant of exemption must be accessible during

UAS operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a

discrepancy exists between the conditions and limitations contained in the grant

of exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, the

conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption take precedence

and must be followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as

outlined in its operating documents. The operator may update or revise its

operating documents. It is the operator's responsibility to track such revisions

and present updated and revised documents to the Administrator upon request.

The operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for

extension or amendment to the grant of exemption. If the operator determines

that any update or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted

the exemption, then the operator must petition for amendment to its grant of

exemption. The FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS-80) may be contacted if

questions arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents. 

10.Prior to each flight the PIC must inspect the UAS to ensure that it is in a

condition for safe flight. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the

safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the

necessary maintenance has been performed and the UAS is found to be in a

condition for safe flight. The Ground Control Station must be included in the

preflight inspection. All maintenance and alterations must be properly

documented in the aircraft records. 

11.Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS

operation or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical

component, must undergo a functional test flight. The PIC who conducts the

functional test flight must make an entry in the aircraft records.

12.The pre-flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g.

inoperable components, items, or equipment, not already covered in the

relevant sections of the operating documents.
24

13.The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer's aircraft/component,

maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements.

14.The operator must carry out its maintenance, inspections, and record keeping

requirements, in accordance with the operating documents. Maintenance,

inspection, alterations, and status of replacement/overhaul component parts

must be noted in the aircraft records, including total time in service, description

of work accomplished, and the signature of the authorized person returning the

UAS to service.

15.Each UASs operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer

Safety Bulletins.

16.The authorized person must make an entry in the aircraft record of the

corrective action taken against discrepancies discovered between inspections.

17.The PIC must possess at least a private pilot certificate and at least a current

third- class medical certificate.

18.The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC meets the

operator's qualification criteria and demonstrates the ability to safely operate

the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under the

exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining

appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC

qualification flight hours must be logged in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R.

§ 61.Sl(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator's PICs are 

permitted under the terms of the exemption. However, training operations may

only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During training,

proficiency, and experience-building flights, all persons not essential for flight

operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA

with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 

91.119.

19.UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 C.F.R. §

19.1. All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological 

conditions (VMC). If flight at night is required, a special request will be made 

at the FAA office closest to proposed area of operations. Flights under special 

visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized. 

20. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point as

denoted on a current FAA-published aeronautical chart unless a letter of

agreement with that airport's management is obtained, and the operation is

conducted in accordance with a NOTAM as required by the operator's COA.

The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available to

the Administrator upon request. 
25

21. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the

PIC. 

22. If the UA loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it must return to a predetermined location within the planned operating area and land or be recovered

in accordance with the operating documents. 

23. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or

emergencies in accordance with the operating documents.

24. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and

forecast weather conditions) there is enough power to fly at normal cruising

speed to the intended landing point and land the UA with 25% battery power

remaining.

25. The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO) issued Certificate

of Waiver or Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any operations under the

grant of exemption. This COA will also require the operator to request a Notice

to Airman (NOTAM) not more than 72 hours in advance, but not less than 48

hours prior to the operation. All operations shall be conducted in accordance

with airspace requirements in the ATO issued COA including class of airspace,

altitude level and potential transponder requirements. 

26. All aircraft operated in accordance with the exemption must be identified by

serial number, registered in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 47, and have

identification (N- Number) markings in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 45,

Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable.

27. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for operation 

and control of the UA must comply with the Federal Communications

Commission (FCC) or other appropriate government oversight agency

requirements.

28. The documents required fewer than 14 C.F.R. 91.9 and 91.203 must be

available to the PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the

UAS is operating. These documents must be made available to the

Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. 

29. The UA must remain clear and yield the right of way to all manned aviation

operations and activities at all times.

30. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

31. Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating

persons (persons other than the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons),

vessels, vehicles, and structures unless: 
a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating

persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The

operator must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such 

protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave 

such protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must 

cease immediately and/or;

b. The aircraft is operated near vessels, vehicles or structures where the

owner/controller of such vessels, vehicles or structures has granted

permission and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of

operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not present

an undue hazard, and;

c. Operations nearer to the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons

do not present an undue hazard to those persons per § 91.119(a).

32. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property

with permission from the land owner/controller or authorized representative.

Permission from land owner/controller or authorized representative will be

obtained for each flight to be conducted.

33. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or

vertical boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA

must be reported to the FAA1s UAS Integration Office (AFS-80) within 24 

hours. Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board 

(NTSB) per instructions contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov.

2. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a)

And (b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

Thomas Hall submits that the equivalent level of safety established by Section 

61.113(a) and (b) will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI 

Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs unless that PIC has demonstrated, by

meeting minimum flight-hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely

operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ or DJI Inspire 1 UAS in a manner consistent with 

the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate

distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

Considering Thomas Hall’s proposed area of operations, and the operating 

limitations set forth-above; the parallel nature of private pilot aeronautical knowledge

26
27

requirements to those of commercial pilot requirements (See Exemption No. 11062); and

the airmanship skills necessary to safely operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ or DJI 

Inspire 1 UAS, Thomas Hall submits that the additional manned airmanship experience

of a commercially certificated pilot would not correlate to the airmanship skills necessary

for Thomas Hall's specific proposed flight operations.

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 61.l 13(a) and (b) specific to

UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g.

Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112,

11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

Thomas Hall will not allow any PIC to operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ or DJI 

Inspire 1 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour 

requirements or the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ or DJI Inspire 1 UAS training and currency 

requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+

or DJI Inspire 1 UAS in a manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive and

emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels,

vehicles and structures.

Specifically, the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent

with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot (with a

minimum of 5 hours of those hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of

UAS to be used for operations under the exemption). In addition to the hour requirements,

the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency

purposes).
28

As in Exemption Nos. 11062, 11138, and 11153, prior documented flight

experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations will ensure an

equivalent level of safety during Thomas Hall's proposed operations. The Administrator 

has held that prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with 

applicable regulations would ensure safe operations, stating as follows: 

In Exemption No. 11062, the FAA required that prior to conducting operations for

the purpose of motion picture filming (or similar operations), the PIC must have

accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 CFR 61.51(b), 25 hours of

total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot including at least 10 hours logged as a UAS

pilot with a multi-rotor UAS. Prior to operations under Exemption No. 11062, the

PIC must also have accumulated and logged a minimum of 5 hours as a UAS pilot

operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations under the

exemption. For clarification, the FAA considers these minimum hour requirements

to be inclusive rather than additive; i.e. 5 hours make and model time may be

included in the 10 hours of multi-rotor time and the 10 hours may be included in

the total 25 hours of UAS rotorcraft time. In addition to the hour requirements, the

PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days (for

currency purposes). The FAA finds that at a minimum, the flight-hour requirements

in Exemption No. 11062 are appropriate to practice and build proficiency in the

skills necessary to safely conduct the petitioner's proposed operations. The FAA 

also finds that prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance

with applicable regulations would satisfy this requirement. Training, proficiency,

and experience-building flights can also be conducted under the grant of exemption

to accomplish the required flight time. During training, proficiency, and

experience-building flights the PIC is required to operate the UA with appropriate

distances in accordance with 14 C.F.R 91.119.

Exemption No. 11138 at page 15.

Accordingly, Thomas Hall will ensure safe operations by not allowing any PIC to operate 

the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ or DJI Inspire 1 UAS unless that PIC has 

demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is

able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ or DJI Inspire 1 UAS in a manner

consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and

maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 
29

3.Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a)

Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.7(a) will be maintained

because prior to every flight, Thomas Hall will ensure that the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ or 

DJI Inspire 1 UAS is in an airworthy condition based upon the UAS's compliance with its 

operating documents and as stated in the conditions and limitations herein. Additionally, 

the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.7(a) specific to UAS, in 

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. 

Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112,

11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

4.Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121

Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.121 will be maintained

because the altitude information of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs will

be provided to the PIC via GPS equipment and a radio communications telemetry data 

link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of the flight path and

altitude. This altitude information, combined with Thomas Hall's operation of the DJI 

Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAs within visual line of sight, at or below 500 feet 

AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. The altitude information 

will be generated by GPS equipment installed onboard the aircraft. Prior to each flight, a 

zero altitude initiation point is automatically established by the UASs at ground level. 

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.121 specific to UAS, in 

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption

Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11112, 11136, 11138,

11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).
30

5.Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b) 

Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

A grant of this exemption would ensure an equivalent level of safety established by

14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b) as a result of (l) the technical specifications of the DJI 

Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs; (2) the limitations on the proposed flight 

operations; and (3) the location of the proposed flight operations. Accordingly, Thomas 

Hall will ensure that it will safely operate the battery powered DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and 

DJI Inspire 1 UAs during daylight hours in VFR conditions, with enough battery power to 

fly for a total duration of 13.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming 

normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes.

Here, as in Exemption No. 11109, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 2

Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs; the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and the

location of the proposed operations, will ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 

14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b). Furthermore, safety will be ensured as the DJI Phantom 2 

Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs provide audible and visual warnings to the PIC at the

GCS when the UAs experiences low battery voltage, the first warning occurring at

approximately 33% remaining battery power, and again at approximately 10% remaining

battery power. At the critically low battery level, the DJI Phantom Vision+ and DJI Inspire

1UASs will descend and land automatically. 

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Section 91.151

establish that safety is not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and

operating limitations of the UAS are considered. Relief has been granted for manned

aircraft to operate at less than the minimums prescribed in Section 91.151, including

Exemption Nos. 2689, 5745, and 10650. Moreover, the FAA has previously granted relief 
31

from Section 91.151 specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to

those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 8811, 10808, 10673, 11042, 11062, 11063,

11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156,

11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

6.Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(l), 91.409(a)(l) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b) Would

Not Adversely Affect Safety.

In seeking this exemption, Thomas Hall submits that the equivalent level of safety 

with regard to the regulatory maintenance and alteration requirements established by 

Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(l), 91.409(a)( l) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) will be met 

because Thomas Hall will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or 

preventive maintenance on the UASs using the methods, techniques, and practices 

prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., the Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI 

Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 Instruction Manual). Furthermore, Thomas Hall 

will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and 

DJI Inspire 1 UASs.

Since the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAS’s will be inspected as 

prescribed by the operating documents, Thomas Hall will maintain the equivalent level of 

safety established by Sections 91.405(a), 91.409(a)( l), and 91.409(a)(2). A copy of the 

DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 User Manuals are attached hereto as Exhibit C 

and D; a copy of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAS Maintenance LOG 

is attached hereto as Exhibit E.

Likewise, the exemption sought will not adversely affect safety because Thomas 

Hall will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations or preventive 
32

maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed by the

operating documents. 

Furthermore, the exemption sought would maintain an equivalent level of safety

established by Sections 91.407, 91.417(a) and 91.417(b), because all maintenance of the

DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAS’s will be performed by trained 

technicians. Maintenance will be documented and maintained utilizing the monthly 

maintenance log. 

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Sections

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(l ), 91.409(a)(l) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) establish that safety is

not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the

UAS are considered.

In consideration of Thomas Hall's proposed operating limitations, the operating 

documents, and the technical aspects of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 

UASs, Thomas Hall submits that safety will not be adversely affected by granting exemption 

from 14 C.F.R. Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(l ) and (a)(2), 91.409(a) (2), and 91.417(a) 

and (b). The FAA has previously granted relief specific to UAS in circumstances similar, in 

all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 

11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 

11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

7. The FAA May Prescribe Any Other Conditions For Safe Operation.

In accordance with Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 

(FMRA) and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16 entitled Special Conditions, Thomas Hall requests that the 

FAA prescribe special conditions for the intended operation of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ 

and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, which contain such safety standards that the
33

Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by

14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R §§ 61.l 13(a) & (b), 91.7 (a), 91.121, 

91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(l), 91.409(a)(l ) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). Such

special conditions will permit safe operation of the UAs for the limited purpose of

conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States for

compensation or hire. FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering

whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a

threat to national security; and further, provides the authority for such UAS to operate

without airworthiness certification in accordance with any requirements that must be

established for the safe operation of the UAS in the NAS.

Likewise, the Administrator may prescribe special conditions pursuant to 14 C.F.R.

§ 21.16, for operation of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, since the

airworthiness regulations of 14 C.F.R. Part 21 do not contain adequate or appropriate

safety standards, due to the novel or unusual design features of the aircraft. Section 21.16, 

entitled Special Conditions, states the following:

If the FAA finds that the airworthiness regulations of this subchapter do not 

contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for an aircraft, aircraft engine, or 

propeller because of a novel or unusual design feature of the aircraft, aircraft engine 

or propeller, he prescribes special conditions and amendments thereto for the 

product. The special conditions are issued in accordance with Part 11 of this chapter 

and contain such safety standards for the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller as the 

FAA finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established in

the regulations.

See 14 C.F.R. § 21.16.

Therefore, in accordance with FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, the FAA 

may prescribe special conditions for Leading Edge's intended operation of the DJI 

Phantom 2 Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UASs, which contain such safety standards that the
34

Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by

14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121,

91.15l(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(l), 91.409(a)(l) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

F. A Summary That Can Be Published In The Federal Register, stating: The Rules

From Which Thomas Hall Seeks Exemption:

Thomas Hall seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections

61.113(a)&(b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.15l(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(l), 91.409(a)(l) &

(a)(2}, and 91.417(a) & (b).

A Brief Description Of The Nature Of The Exemption Thomas Hall Seeks:

This exemption will permit Thomas Hall to commercially operate an Unmanned 

Aircraft System (UAS)for the purpose of conducting aerial video and

photography over certain areas of the United States.

G. Any Additional Information, Views, Or Arguments Available To Support 

Thomas Hall's Request.

This Petition is made pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012

(FMRA) Section 333, which directs the Secretary of Transportation to determine if certain

UAS may operate safely in the NAS. As such, Thomas Hall's request for exemption may be 

granted pursuant to the authority of FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, as

Set forth above.

FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will

create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national

security; and further, provides the authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness

certification.

As discussed in detail above, Thomas Hall will operate the DJI Phantom 2 

Vision+ and DJI Inspire 1 UAS’s safely in the NAS, without creating a hazard to users 

of the NAS, or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security.

36

Thomas Hall

850 Caroline Street,

Billings, MT 59105 

406-694-3584

Email: ecstomh@gmail.com 

Appendices: 

A -DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ Specifications Data Sheet

B -DJI Inspire 1 Specifications Data Sheet

C -DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ Manufacturer's User Manual

D -DJI Inspire 1 Manufacturer's User Manual

E -Monthly Maintenance Log
37

APPENDIX -A

DJI PHANTOM 2 VISION+ TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

Thomas Hall only utilizes safe and reliable UASs. DJI is an industry leader in small UAS 

production. DJI UASs are loaded with ground breaking software enabling the user to set 

parameters which will not allow flight into controlled airspace. Parameters can also be set 

to limit flight to no higher than a predetermined and set altitude as well as limit flight to a 

predetermined and set distance. In addition, DJI software provides real-time altitude and 

location information to the PIC via the linked monitor (smart phone/tablet devices) 

1.1 DJI Phantom 2 Vision+

1.1.1 Aircraft 

1.1.1.1 Supported Battery -DJI 5200mAH Li-ion Battery

1.1.1.2 Weight (Battery & Propellers Included) -2lbs 11.810oz (1242g)

1.1.1.3 Hover Accuracy (Ready to Fly) -Vertical: .Sm; Horizontal: 2.5m

1.1.1.4 Max Yaw Angular Velocity - 200°/s

1.1.1.5 Max Tilt Angel - 35°

1.1.1.6 Max Ascent Speed -6m/s

1.1.1.7 Max Descent Speed -2m/s

1.1.1.8 Max Flight Speed - 15m/s (NOT RECOMMENDED)

1.1.2 Gimbal 

1.1.2.1 Working Current - Static: 750mA; Dynamic: 900mA

1.1.2.2 Control Accuracy - ±0.03°

1.1.2.3 Controllable Range -Pitch: -90 – 0°

1.1.2.4 Maximum Angular Speed -Pitch: 90°/s

1.1.3 Camera

1.1.3.1 Operating Temperature Range - 32°F - 104°F (O°C - 40°C) 

1.1.3.2 Sensor Size - 1/2.3"

1.1.3.3 Effective Pixels - 14M

1.1.3.4 Resolution -4384x3288

4.1.3.5 HD Video Recording - 1080p30 & 720p

4.1.3.6 Recording Field of View - 1100°/85°

1.1.4 Transmitter 

1.1.4.1 Operating Frequency - 5.728GHz - 5.85GHz

1.1.4.2 Communication Distance (unobstructed) -FCC Compliance: 800m

1.1.4.3 Receiver Sensitivity (1%PER) - -93dBm

1.1.4.4 Transmitter Power -FCC Compliance: l00mW

1.1.4.5 Working Voltage - 120mA@3.7V

1.1.5Range Extender

1.1.5.1 Operating Frequency -2412-2462MHz
38

1.1.5.2 Communication Distance (unobstructed) - 500-700m

1.1.5.3 Transmitter Power -20dBm

1.1.5.4 Power Consumption -2W
40

APPENDIX-B 

DJI INSPIRE 1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 

Thomas Hall only utilizes safe and reliable UASs. DJI is an industry leader in small UAS 

production. DGI UASs are loaded with ground breaking software enabling the user to set 

parameters which will not allow flight into controlled airspace. Parameters can also be set to limit 

flight to no higher than a predetermined and set altitude as well as limit flight to a predetermined 

and set distance. In addition, DJI software provides real-time altitude and location information to 

the PIC via the linked monitor (smart phone/tablet devices) 

 2.2 DJI Inspire 1 

 2.2.1 Aircraft 

 2.2.1.1 Model T600 

 2.2.1.2 Weight (Battery Included) – 6lbs 7.5291oz (2935g) 

 2.2.1.3 Hovering Accuracy (GPS Mode) – Vertical: 0.5m; Horizontal: 2.5m 

 2.2.1.4 Max Angular Velocity – Pitch: 300 /s; Yaw; 150 ̊ ̊/s 

 2.2.1.5 Max Tilt Angle – 35 ̊ 

 2.2.1.6 Max Ascent Speed – 5m/s 

 2.2.1.7 Max Descent Speed – 4m/s 

 2.2.1.8 Max Speed – 22m/s (ATTI mode, no wind – NOT RECOMMENDED) 

 2.2.1.9 Max Flight Altitude – 4500m 

 2.2.1.10 Max Wind Resistance – 10m/s 

 2.2.1.11 Max Flight Time – Approximately 18 minutes 

 2.2.1.12 Motor Model – DJI 3510 

 2.2.1.13 Propeller Model – DJI 1345 

 2.2.1.14 Operating Temperature Range - 14̊F to 104̊ F (-10̊ C to 40̊C) 

 2.2.1.15 Dimensions – 17 1⁄4” x 17 3⁄4” x 12” 

 2.2.2 Gimbal 

 2.2.2.1 Model ZENMUSE X3 

 2.2.2.2 Output Power (with camera) – Static: 9W; In Motion: 11W 

 2.2.2.3 Operating Current – Static: 750mA; In Motion: 900mA 

 2.2.2.4 Angular Vibration Range - + 0.03 ̊ 

 2.2.2.5 Mounting – Detachable 

 2.2.2.6 Controllable Range – Pitch; -90̊ to +30̊; Pan: +320 ̊

 2.2.2.7 Mechanical Range – Pitch; -125̊ to 45̊; Pan: + 330̊

 2.2.2.8 Max Controllable Speed – Pitch: 120̊ /s; Pan: 180̊ /s 

 2.2.3.1 Camera 

 2.2.3.1 Name – X3 

 2.2.3.2 Model – FC350 

 2.2.3.3 Total Pixels – 12.76M 

 

 
40

2.2.3.4 Effective Pixels -12.4M

2.2.3.5 Image Max Size - 4000x3000

2.2.3.6 ISO Range -100-3200

2.2.3.7 Field of View - 94°

2.2.3.8 CMOS - Sony EXMOR 1/2.3"

2.2.3.9 HD Video Recording - UHD(4K): 4096x2160p24/2S,

3840x2160p24/25/30; FHD: 1920x1080p24/25/30/48/50/60; HD:

1280x720p24/25/30/48/50/60

2.2.3.10 Operating Temperature Range - 32°F - 104°F (o0c - 40°C)

2.2.4 Transmitter

2.2.4.1 Name –C1

2.2.4.2 Operating Frequency - 5.728-5.850GHz; 2.400-2.483GHz 

2.2.4.3 Communicating Distance (unobstructed) - 2000m

2.2.4.4 Output Power - 9W

2.2.4.5 Operating Temperature Range - 14°F to 104°F (-10°c to 40°C)

2.2.4.6 Battery - 600mAh Li-ion 2S
4

APPENDIX -C

DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ Manufacturer's User Manual
4

APPENDIX -D

DJI Inspire 1 Manufacturer's User Manual
4

APPENDIX -E

MONTHLY MAINTENANCE 

SHEET morrth· (year·

UAStJ-.t Date/Issue(

Di5r;overed

O..te055ue(

AdDJIo55ed l55ue(Description(&(Maintenance(Conducted Malntenance(Performed(By:(U

Prlrrt(&Slgn)

Softwara(Updata•    

Airframe(    

En1lnas    

Propellers    

Camera/Gimbal    

Landing(Gear    

Vlbratlon(Dampenlng    

Other: