Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 44 / Friday, March 6, 2015 / Notices 12209 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 

4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL 

MANAGEMENT 

Submission for Review: Certificate of 

Medical Examination, 3206–0250 

AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel 

Management. 

ACTION: Notice and Request for 

Comments. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel 

Management (OPM) offers the general 

public and other Federal agencies the 

opportunity to comment on an 

extension without change of a currently 

approved collection, information 

collection request (ICR) 3206–0250, 

Certificate of Medical Examination. As 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995, (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. 

chapter 35) as amended by the ClingerCohen Act (Pub. L. 104–106), OPM is 

soliciting comments for this collection. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted until April 6, 2015. 

This process is conducted in accordance 

with 5 CFR 1320.1. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit written comments on 

the proposed information collection to 

Employee Services, U.S. Office of 

Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, 

NW., Washington, DC 20415, Attention: 

Phil Spottswood or via electronic mail 

to employ@opm.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A 

copy of this ICR, with applicable 

supporting documentation, may be 

obtained by contacting Hiring Policy, 

U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 

1900 E Street NW., Washington, DC 

20415, Attention: Phil Spottswood or 

via electronic mail to employ@opm.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Optional Form (OF) 178, Certificate of 

Medical Examination, is used to collect 

medical information about individuals 

who are incumbents of positions which 

require physical fitness/agility testing 

and/or medical examinations, or who 

have been selected for such a position 

contingent upon meeting physical 

fitness/agility testing and medical 

examinations as a condition of 

employment. This information is 

needed to ensure fair and consistent 

treatment of employees and job 

applicants, to adjudicate the medicallybased passover of a preference eligible, 

and to adjudicate claims of 

discrimination under the Americans 

with Disabilities Act (ADA). 

As required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 

44 U.S.C. chapter 35) as amended by the 

Clinger-Cohen Act (Pub. L. 104–106), 

OPM is soliciting comments for this 

collection to: 

1. Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

2. Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

3. Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

4. Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submissions 

of responses. 

A Federal Register notice opening a 

60-day comment period on the 

extension was published on December 

16, 2014, at 79 FR 74777. The comment 

period closed February 17, 2015. No 

comments were received. 

Analysis 

Agency: Employee Services, U.S. 

Office of Personnel Management. 

Title: Certificate of Medical 

Examination. 

OMB Number: 3206–0250. 

Affected Public: Federal Government. 

Number of Respondents: 45,000. 

Estimated Time Per Respondent: 3 

hours. 

Total Burden Hours: 135,000 hours. 

U.S. Office of Personnel Management. 

Katherine Archuleta, 

Director. 

[FR Doc. 2015–05276 Filed 3–5–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6325–39–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–74403; File No. SR–BATS– 

2015–15] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS 

Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and 

Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed 

Rule Change To Amend Rule 11.22 To 

Update the Names of Certain Market 

Data Products 

March 2, 2015. 

Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 

‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2

notice is hereby given that on February 

18, 2015, BATS Exchange, Inc. (the 

‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BATS’’) filed with the 

Securities and Exchange Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule 

change as described in Items I and II 

below, which Items have been prepared 

by the Exchange. The Exchange has 

designated this proposal as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’ proposed rule change 

pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the 

Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) 

thereunder,4 which renders it effective 

upon filing with the Commission. The 

Commission is publishing this notice to 

solicit comments on the proposed rule 

change from interested persons. 

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of Substance of 

the Proposed Rule Change 

The Exchange filed a proposal to 

amend Rule 11.22, Data Products, to 

update the names of certain products to 

align with recent changes made to the 

names of the same products in the 

Exchange’s fee schedule. 

The text of the proposed rule change 

is available at the Exchange’s Web site 

at www.batstrading.com, at the 

principal office of the Exchange, and at 

the Commission’s Public Reference 

Room. 

II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

In its filing with the Commission, the 

Exchange included statements 

concerning the purpose of and basis for 

the proposed rule change and discussed 

any comments it received on the 

proposed rule change. The text of these 

statements may be examined at the 

places specified in Item IV below. The 

Exchange has prepared summaries, set 

forth in sections A, B, and C below, of 

the most significant parts of such 

statements. 

A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

1. Purpose 

The Exchange proposes to amend 

Rule 11.22, Data Products, to update the 

names of certain products to align with 

recent changes made to the names of the 

same products in the Exchange’s fee 

schedule. On February 3, 2015, the 

Exchange filed a proposed rule change 

with the Commission that, among other 

things, amended the Exchange’s fee 

schedule to rename ‘‘BZX Exchange 

PITCH Feed’’ as the ‘‘BZX Depth’’, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

12210 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 44 / Friday, March 6, 2015 / Notices 

5See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74285 

(February 18, 2015) (SR–BATS–2015–11). 

6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 

7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 

8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). 

9 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b– 

4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give 

the Commission written notice of its intent to file 

the proposed rule change at least five business days 

prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule 

change, or such shorter time as designated by the 

Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this 

requirement. 

10 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 

11 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). 

12For purposes only of waiving the operative 

delay for this proposal, the Commission has 

considered the proposed rule’s impact on 

efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 

15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 

‘‘BZX Exchange Top Feed’’ as ‘‘BZX 

Top’’, ‘‘BZX Exchange Historical TOP’’ 

as ‘‘BZX Historical Top’’, and 

‘‘Historical PITCH’’ as ‘‘Historical 

Depth.’’ 5 The Exchange now proposes 

to rename the following data products 

under Rule 11.22 to align with these 

changes: (i) ‘‘TCP PITCH’’ under 

subparagraph (a) would be renamed 

‘‘TCP Depth’’; (ii) ‘‘Multicast PITCH’’ 

under subparagraph (c) would be 

renamed ‘‘Multicast Depth’’; and (iii) 

‘‘TOP’’ under subparagraph (d) would 

be renamed ‘‘Top’’. The Exchange does 

not propose to amend the content or any 

other aspect of these market data 

products. 

2. Statutory Basis 

The Exchange believes that its 

proposal is consistent with section 6(b) 

of the Act 6 in general, and furthers the 

objectives of section 6(b)(5) of the Act 7

in particular, in that it is designed to 

promote just and equitable principles of 

trade, to foster cooperation and 

coordination with persons engaged in 

facilitating transactions in securities, to 

remove impediments to and perfect the 

mechanism of a free and open market 

and a national market system and, in 

general, to protect investors and the 

public interest. The Exchange does not 

believe that this proposal will permit 

unfair discrimination among customers, 

brokers, or dealers because it will apply 

to all Users. The proposed rule change 

does not propose to amend the content 

or any other aspect of these market data 

products. Rather, it simply proposes to 

align the naming convention of the 

Exchange’s market data products across 

its rules and fee schedule, making the 

Exchange’s rules clearer and less 

confusing for investors. Therefore, the 

Exchange believes the proposed rule 

change removes impediments to and 

perfects the mechanism of a free and 

open market and a national market 

system, and, in general, protects 

investors and the public interest. 

B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Burden on Competition 

The Exchange does not believe that 

the proposal will impose any burden on 

competition not necessary or 

appropriate in furtherance of the 

purposes of the Act. The proposed rule 

change is not designed to address any 

competitive issues but rather avoid 

investor confusion by providing 

consistency amongst the naming 

conventions used for the Exchange 

market data products. 

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Comments on the 

Proposed Rule Change Received From 

Members, Participants or Others 

The Exchange has neither solicited 

nor received written comments on the 

proposed rule change. 

III. Date of Effectiveness of the 

Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 

Commission Action 

Because the foregoing proposed rule 

change does not: (i) Significantly affect 

the protection of investors or the public 

interest; (ii) impose any significant 

burden on competition; and (iii) become 

operative for 30 days from the date on 

which it was filed, or such shorter time 

as the Commission may designate, it has 

become effective pursuant to section 

19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 8 and 

subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4 

thereunder.9

A proposed rule change filed under 

Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 10 normally does not 

become operative prior to 30 days after 

the date of the filing. However, pursuant 

to Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii),11 the 

Commission may designate a shorter 

time if such action is consistent with the 

protection of investors and the public 

interest. The Exchange has asked the 

Commission to waive the 30-day 

operative delay so the Exchange may 

clarify its rules by making them 

consistent throughout by reflecting a 

change in naming conventions used for 

Exchange market data products. The 

Commission believes that waiving the 

30-day operative delay is consistent 

with the protection of investors and the 

public interest because it will allow the 

Exchange to provide consistency within 

their rules and avoid potential investor 

confusion. Therefore, the Commission 

hereby waives the 30-day operative 

delay and designates the proposed rule 

change to be operative upon filing with 

the Commission.12

At any time within 60 days of the 

filing of the proposed rule change, the 

Commission summarily may 

temporarily suspend such rule change if 

it appears to the Commission that such 

action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in 

the public interest; (ii) for the protection 

of investors; or (iii) otherwise in 

furtherance of the purposes of the Act. 

If the Commission takes such action, the 

Commission shall institute proceedings 

to determine whether the proposed rule 

should be approved or disapproved. 

IV. Solicitation of Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views and 

arguments concerning the foregoing, 

including whether the proposed rule 

change is consistent with the Act. 

Comments may be submitted by any of 

the following methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s Internet 

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/

rules/sro.shtml); or 

• Send an email to rule-comments@

sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– 

BATS–2015–15 on the subject line. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities 

and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street 

NE., Washington, DC 20549. 

All submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–BATS–2015–15. This file 

number should be included on the 

subject line if email is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 

submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for Web site viewing and 

printing in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 

Washington, DC 20549, on official 

business days between the hours of 

10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such 

filing also will be available for 

inspection and copying at the principal 

office of the Exchange. All comments 

received will be posted without change; 

the Commission does not edit personal 

identifying information from 

submissions. You should submit only 

information that you wish to make 

available publicly. All submissions 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 44 / Friday, March 6, 2015 / Notices 12211 

13 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). 

4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 

5 15 U.S.C. 78q–1. 

6 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(D). 

7 15 U.S.C. 78q–1. 

8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). 

9 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 

should refer to File Number SR–BATS– 

2015–15 and should be submitted on or 

before March 27, 2015. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.13

Brent J. Fields, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2015–05158 Filed 3–5–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–74400; File No. SR–ICEEU– 

2015–001] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE 

Clear Europe Limited; Notice of Filing 

and Immediate Effectiveness of 

Proposed Rule Change Relating to ICE 

Clear Europe Clearing Fees 

March 2, 2015. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2

notice is hereby given that on February 

19, 2015, ICE Clear Europe Limited 

(‘‘ICE Clear Europe’’) filed with the 

Securities and Exchange Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule 

change as described in Items I, II and III 

below, which Items have been prepared 

primarily by ICE Clear Europe. ICE Clear 

Europe filed the proposal pursuant to 

Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,3 and 

Rule 19b–4(f)(2) 4 thereunder, so that the 

proposal was effective upon filing with 

the Commission. The Commission is 

publishing this notice to solicit 

comments on the proposed rule change 

from interested persons. 

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of Substance of 

the Proposed Rule Change 

The text of the proposed rule change 

consists of certain rule changes that 

have been proposed by ICE Clear 

Europe. The principal purpose of the 

proposed changes is to specify the 

clearing and other fees to be charged by 

ICE Clear Europe in respect of the 

clearing of equity contracts traded on 

the LIFFE Administration and 

Management market which have 

transitioned to trading on ICE Futures 

Europe (‘‘Migrating Contracts’’). 

II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

In its filing with the Commission, ICE 

Clear Europe included statements 

concerning the purpose of and basis for 

the proposed rule change and discussed 

any comments it received on the 

proposed rule change. The text of these 

statements may be examined at the 

places specified in Item IV below. ICE 

Clear Europe has prepared summaries, 

set forth in sections A, B, and C below, 

of the most significant aspects of these 

statements. 

A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

1. Purpose 

The purpose of the proposed rule 

change is for ICE Clear Europe to adopt 

a new fee schedule in respect of the 

clearing of the Migrating Contracts 

following the transition of trading in 

such contracts to ICE Futures Europe. 

The new fee schedule specifies certain 

exchange and clearing fees, as well as 

certain assignment, delivery and other 

fees applicable to the Migrating 

Contracts. The new fee schedule will 

replace the fee schedule previously 

published by ICE Futures Europe in 

respect of equity contracts. The 

combined exchange and clearing fees 

under the new fee schedule are the same 

as those being charged prior to the 

transition of trading in such contracts to 

ICE Futures Europe. 

2. Statutory Basis 

ICE Clear Europe has determined that 

the clearing fees in the new schedule 

continue to be appropriate to charge 

Clearing Members in connection with 

the clearing of the Migrating Contracts 

by ICE Clear Europe. ICE Clear Europe 

notes in this regard that the fees are the 

same as those currently charged for such 

contracts. ICE Clear Europe believes that 

imposing such clearing fees is 

consistent with the requirements of 

Section 17A of the Act 5 and the 

regulations thereunder applicable to it, 

and in particular continues to provide 

for the equitable allocation of reasonable 

dues, fees, and other charges among its 

Clearing Members, within the meaning 

of Section 17A(b)(3)(D) of the Act.6 ICE 

Clear Europe thus believes that the 

proposed rule change is consistent with 

the requirements of Section 17A of the 

Act 7 and regulations thereunder 

applicable to it. 

B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Burden on Competition 

ICE Clear Europe does not believe the 

proposed rule change would have any 

impact, or impose any burden, on 

competition. The fees in the revised fee 

schedule are the same as those being 

charged prior to the transition in trading 

of the Migrating Contracts to ICE 

Futures Europe. 

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Comments on the 

Proposed Rule Change Received From 

Members, Participants or Others 

Written comments relating to the 

proposed changes to the rules have not 

been solicited or received. ICE Clear 

Europe will notify the Commission of 

any written comments received by ICE 

Clear Europe. 

III. Date of Effectiveness of the 

Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 

Commission Action 

The foregoing rule change has become 

effective upon filing pursuant to Section 

19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 8 and Rule 19b– 

4(f)(2) 9 thereunder because it 

establishes a fee or other charge 

imposed by ICE Clear Europe on its 

Clearing Members, within the meaning 

of Rule 19b–4(f)(2). Specifically, the 

proposed rule change will establish fees 

to be paid by Clearing Members to ICE 

Clear Europe with respect to the 

clearing of Migrating Contracts. At any 

time within 60 days of the filing of the 

proposed rule change, the Commission 

summarily may temporarily suspend 

such rule change if it appears to the 

Commission that such action is 

necessary or appropriate in the public 

interest, for the protection of investors, 

or otherwise in furtherance of the 

purposes of the Act. 

IV. Solicitation of Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views, and 

arguments concerning the foregoing, 

including whether the proposed rule 

change is consistent with the Act. 

Comments may be submitted by any of 

the following methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s Internet 

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/

rules/sro.shtml) or 

• Send an email to rule-comments@

sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– 

ICEEU–2015–001 on the subject line. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES