alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Denied; and Opinion Filed September 17 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 01110
- CV IN RE ANN STOKLEY , Relator
Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 15
- 03285 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang

- Miers, Stoddart, and Whitehill

Opinion by Justice Stoddart Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus requesting that the Court or der the trial court to sign a written order on her special appearance, which the trial court orally denied on July 10, 2015, and rule on her motion for stay filed August 11, 2015. Relator states that she wishes to appeal the ruling on her special appeara nce. See T EX
. C IV
. P RAC
. & R EM
. C ODE A NN
. § 51.014( a)(7). A written order is necessary for a party to perfect appeal from a trial court’s order because the appellate timetable runs from the date the judgment or order is signed. See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 26.1, F

armer v. Ben E. Keith Co ., 907 S.W.2d 495, 496 (Tex. 1995) (per curiam). Neither an oral order nor a docket entry provide s a substitute for a written order signed by the trial court. Utilities Pipeline Co. v. Am. Petrofina Mktg. , 760 S.W.2d 719, 723 (Tex . App.

—– 2

–

Dallas 1988, no writ); see also Ex parte Rains, 257 S.W. 217, 220 ( Tex. 1923); In re Fuentes , 960 S.W.2d 261, 264 (Tex. App.

— Corpus Christi 1997, no pet.). A trial court abuses its discretion when it fails to rule within a reasonable time on a pretrial motion that has been properly presented to it. In re Amir

– Sharif, 357 S.W.3d 180, 181 (Tex. App.

– Dallas 2012, orig. proceeding). The circumstances of the case dictate whether the trial court has ruled within a reasonable time. Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.

– Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding). Many factors determine whether a trial court has ruled within a reasonable time. Among these are “the trial court's actual knowledge of the motion, whether its refusal to act is overt, the state of the court's docket, and the existence of other judicial and administrative matters which must be addressed first.” In re Chavez , 62 S.W.3d 225, 228

– 229 (Tex. App.

– Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding). On the record before the Court, it does not appear at this time that the trial court has abused its discretion in failing to sign a written order memorializing its ruling on the special appearance or in failing to rule on the motion for stay. We deny the petition.

151110F.P05 /Craig Stoddart/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
<PAGE>
 
Coopers                                       Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

& Lybrand                                     a professional services firm

          
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of The Carbide/Graphite Group, Inc. on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-570) of 
our reports dated September 10, 1996 on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule of The Carbide/Graphite Group, Inc. 
and Subsidiaries as of July 31, 1996 and 1995 and for each of the three years in
the period ended July 31, 1996, which reports are incorporated by reference or 
included in this Form 10-K.





Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
October 28, 1996




















   Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., is a member of Coopers & Lybrand International,
          a limited liability association incorporated in Switzerland.
--,\.-~~--

-=:~~:.~f ID:A66575 

Dr .. D • ..._.l 

'2 Rubbol:ri Park 

~38,~ta 

~Dr. ~el1 

., 

Dl 'j.'f?v 

SC'1alt 2 a DEC 1QSt 

'fbo 115.tiom.1 Seetzrlt.;" ~cy t!cittftt1f'1c Ad.YUcr/ Joard (IEAS.Q), a 

lN:ldy vitb ~or nrerer..ce ff\ tort~ in \be i»c:l~ to this lJltter, 

1't1QUt. llka te 'be ill • poo1t1on to call \JpOll ednallt R1ent18t.a •'.1.;h ae 

J'CU?'llt!lt tar iw-rt-t!me llil!!'l"'l1eee or tor ~c!al ocn:oultatton in mtter• 

-""-

at J.Atel"eat to the Jos.rd am .r an;tt ~ett 1n the mttOl'l&l !!et'enaa. 

At 1b !alt ••t!llfl1 llliL'ft1B ao-eed ~ -~U•h ~ pa.r~l• aevote-1 

nspectiTCtly to tM ttel.de at -~tica, telec~..ttt\eatiot!.$ 1 ud. elecw=tc.. xi .s.. propQ9c1 t.bat ~ ...-t1?!£1' d iJlO :plmt!le '1& Tft'1 tnb'cquent and \Mt, u a plll!!lal nlo, ~1 111 blus 'be ca.Uei ~to usut 

the ~ en a iDUv.1.dwU. e=aulte.ftt "91.a ~ then eel)' u ~ir (N1'l 

tiQa ud. «me en1ttfte41! vU.l pt:t'!rlt. \"iitt ~ il!YolTl!d can ut:e.11 Y,:)l'k 

an both u. appliorl Sbi. t•te:?!1-c'h l~l•. 

!he cbaJ.r.;:xm or the l"9ipa:'t-ho panelil ..,.. all ~s or JISAS>Jl. 

Wiien it.e puielJI aro cp!!ratiQe u ll.lC'h \bef v1ll ~ 1ibrotJ.s::a t.be1r e~!l" .. 

~who YUl ·~to the~. 

Tw i.va beon JX?:l1cattd. }Or JIJNWJ tor ~~.q, cc tM 7'<>1~tn1-

~ 

cat1cme ~1, UIS~~ 1ilbich t• Mr. a. P. Cc-nth, VlC"O' Preaid"'1lt,. 

Q:ltQn Tel.egro;lih C<lG:t;Qt9'1 &o .aeon S~~ ... Roam A•!), hv York 

131 1tew Yark. 

u tott a:ro U:terest...-.a ta -ating • ·tn ~ or ou:: pl'Obie., 

pleeM attept tha ~tian vi.th \Ile ~-nee ttlat ~ &Mistan~c 

cm bo e. Hal eontl"il.."Ution to ti. -.tiocal a.rane-o. 

I!' JC1t1 4o DOt be.ft tl:Mr requ.itti stora.te taoil1.tiea (~ ... co.:!>iM-

'1.ou aar. or tu eq..itvalent) tw tb& lneloaUN, pleu~ nturn it, 111 'th! 

tCllifJle tlmelopo I 18llooe4 berevith • 

l~t 

liA ... ll-3 (Coot.} 

MlPHJ. ~ 

~t OeMn..11 IS ~ 

Mreetcr 

&•~» .~-

0 I

., 11 3 _ p.inL ~J ;t 'd" hU1_i.. ':{"3 

Identical ltr sent to Mr. J. z. Millar - ~ --r ''-7--, 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 06-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 17

- 00424

- CV

IN RE DOUBLE DIAMOND , INC.

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. 1

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed December 22, 2017

[OT06]

1 In light of our disposition, we dismiss relator’s motion for temporary relief as moot.In re Double Diamond, Inc. Page 2
Honorable John Narallall JUUer 

United States Senate 

WaaAiDgton 25, I>. c. 

Dear SeDator Butler: 

REF ID:A43480 --------,.,_-

• 

1er1a1a N 2368 

12 OCT 1961 

'l'h1• 1• 1D repJ.7 to 7our letter Oft OotoMr 5, 1961., coa.cend.Dg Mr. 

Maurice B. llein. 

'l'he Director ot Securit7 i..a DO recall.eet10D u4 there 18 DO 1ndie&• 

tion in our recorda tat e1 tber General Cant• or Gea.eral ~or4 were 

intoned ot tile d.iacrepm:1• in Mr. IQ.ein •• penoaaJ. hietol"J' atateanta 

tu.4 1D 1949 and 1953· VIMID cert.ain t4 -.... aiut&t.eat. wre :tint 

brc:Nil'bt 'to 'tlq attent10D 111 Maroh or 1961, 1t vu Wl7 op1D1cm, baaed Oil 

the 1D1"ona:t1cm then a'ftil.a'bl• and rq prrtiowa uaoc1at1au vttla Mr. 

Kle1D, tlat tb97 were 1.olated inatmo• at error llD4 were not llltm• 

tianal atutat•enta at tact. Since t.MD., certain ad41t1caal .1Dtmmt1on 

baa becma a-11.abl• v1 th reepeot t.o otamo mtancea o:t 111.Utat...ta b7 

Mr. ll•1D CD otticial form. It i• DOV IV opinion tbat thee• t.vo •1•-

•tat•rnta were inteati-.ll7 ade; alld. that ~ are 1aocajatilll• with 

the reap:m.a1b1l1 ti ea required. at tJle 1nclment of the 1JlpJrtaDt aa4 

awi t1v• poai Uon ot Aaiatut Director tor ,..,_.mt Serviw v1tll 

?9pcm1bil1t.7 ror m.1Dte1n1zaa tor tlae ~ th• h1gb.eat •tlud&rd.a at 

accuraq in peraamel record.a. 

cc: DIR.~:;.,;~-· ~· -....L ... 

M02 

Sincerely, 

L. B. J'ROOT 

Vice .Admiral, tlUi 

Director 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 10-08-2013 pursuantto E.O. 1352e
REF ID:A444BB 

¢9!!'.!J!!tif!l: 

~"Ti NBA YI l~ a.tget ~ 

'1\>: 'tM ~ or tbl Al"lfl¥ 'f'Uf~ 

W.-.td.nat;oo 2,, n. c. 

AftiA: IiJ...l.'rctor of AftQ' ~ 

N 025'.i 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

~~; (a) \SD (C\W) ~~ for \.be ~ Seerete.17 

"t tbe Ar./ (IK), /~~J • 1WiiA. u4 - ~otal.a u 

tDe Ano- n 1962 ~%.•, lJ /}.)ec 0o 

( o) Vi,;A ltr t.o . tiat10DB1. N1cUr1 t.¥ Agency, S..WJ : BuApt 

Gu.Ul&ncre, n 1S6;?, 6 Jan 61 

i. Jie.t'41NDae (a) utabllatM'l an ~ otl lt4 be 

1acl.u4eA. for fliA in /tbe Ano' n l9Cia bu•-· .... \be Opeft.t.iQl'l Mil 

t'aJJlt.,..e, A.ni:.Yr~ioa (~• ,,,...._ 2100)• 

2. fjy J'el"~ (t.t), tht• ~1 _. abl..a that an ~ ot 

I , I.a being inel\111*1 tor ~ .~ the iJ/FA., f-ll\!ket. (P 2700) 

t• *'1ul•aion to Digber ~t,-. 1'bia ...... t 1• _ I ie. 

tm.n the n i962 total a~ tor rISA b7 tDe-~ oz u.r... 

IL!ld t.he IMrau ~ the lh:'lpt. 

3. Lt i• tbenfon remwtet tJwt t1- o/M, Az:rq Btildiet be nrrtM4 

to J.nclud.e tM amouat orl -(l' 2TQ)) ~tor Jut1t1cat1oa 

bJ' tbe NatWoal Secwtt.1 Af;GllCJ to~· 

C.;),p1.ee .f\m'uteba4: 

1... h. ¥lU:lT 

Vice Adainl.,, ~"1 

Director 

<~ c. a. !:reklwt, U3HC-itet, 

A.Mt to S.:Def', Sp U,pDa 

,_.. c.eaq.-. w. ~-

~ (~QI/I') ---e-cl-as-s-if-ie~d-a-n~d-a-pp_r_ov_e_d~f~or_r_e~le-as-e~b-y~N~S~A..-on----.-04~-~30~-~2~0~14,...... 

ursuantto E.O. 13526 
REF ID:A444BB 

... 

Serial: 

cc: Dm~ _,,.. AG 'i:ill,....,..,,..-- PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Reading File 

COMP-4 

CCMP-Ol. __ Ftrv 

M/R: By decision of SEODEF\ and BOB, an amount o~ I in O/R 1\mds 

(Program ZTOO) was approved *8-NSA tor incl.usion 1n the Arrq budget 

submission to Coogress. This total was f'ormall.7 stated in reference (a). 

The source of' thft !amount quoted by Army in reference (b) is 

unknown. It is im;portant tbat tbis discrepancy be resolved prior to the 

Congressional hearings. 

·' ~ -
AMERICAN AIRLINES 


April 9, 2010 

Dorothy Beard 

Docket Branch 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: U.S.-Japan Alliance Case, DOT-OST-2010-0059 

Dear Ms. Beard: 

American Airlines, Inc. hereby submits letters in 

support of its application for antitrust immunity with Japan 

Airlines from Federal and State elected offi als, mayors, airports, chambers of commerce, and union leaders. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Carl B. Nelson, Jr. 

Associate General Counsel 

American Airlines, Inc. 

1101 17th Street, N.W., Suite 600 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

(202) 496-5647 

carl.nelson@aa.com 

cc: Service list 








































































































































































CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing 

document by email on the following persons: 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

scott.mcclain@delta.com 

sametta.c.barnett@delta.com 

kquinn@pillsburywinthrop.com 

bkeiner@crowell.com 

mrosia@crowell.com 

bruce.rabinovitz@wilmerhale.com 

jeffrey.manley@united.com 

bob.kneisley@wnco.com 

robert.land@jetblue.com 

msinick@ssd.com 

cdonley@ssd.com 

gbleopard@fedex.com 

dvaughan@kelleydrye.com 

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com 

jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com 

lhalloway@crowell.com 

efaberman@wileyrein.com 

mroller@rollerbauer.com 

howard.kass@usairways.com 

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com 

sophy.chen@hklaw.com 

david.heffernan@wilmerhale.com 

April 9 T 2010 

jhill@dlalaw.com 

bill@mietuslaw.com 

mgoldman@sgbdc.com 

rsilverberg@sgbdc.com 

dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com 

mcmillin@woa.com 

eskraft@jamhoff.com 

dpdean@jamhoff.com 

dkirstein@yklaw.com 

jyoung@yklaw.com 

donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov 

dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil 

jim.ballough@faa.gov 

byerlyjr@state.gov 

recohn@hhlaw.com 

simpson@zsrlaw.com 

pmurphy@lopmurphy.com 

lachter@starpower.net 

anita.mosner@hklaw.com 

rpommer@atlasair.com 

gmurphy@crowell.com 

russell.bailey@alpa.org
-Aw•-- ..... -'ilL ~ -~~-£ ... 

REF ID:A66888 

'* .. l'4 :':Clt&tt fta. 

EA14i_.~ 

Mlld$n\ ... !a 

~ 

~ 

1eae 

~ ~"f 

&cpmaa~ 

ft• G~l 

or~ 

~ 

ftllts:at.m, ~ lti1!!14J 

w•.~tr.:m 

I bin ~"'4 :.p.~ Wt.er ~ a ~ US> t.a Wdeb 19G 

PliaGt4 'P$ dtd,.,CA -.&th _.~ \o ~ 11&1.bl.tJ,on aato::do4 

to ,m w iioawae •~Bl av ~.I DlaN. l\ 1a with 

~ ... t. \t~ l ~4 ~ 1f;fiJr 1=!4,l1'1 to ~t. at \b10 

U. a::a.i ldll. with~ ftl.uet..:--. heft to a•;jda bJIO!l'I dm!ld ~ 

1hdc1"\1 ,_ tw ~ klI¥l ~1416.lr;. ti.on Md tw 1'f.N'I 

~ 1.¥\ '*11\i ., t£iw to Yis1 \ vl V't • at t.illlt Cw\OG 

~t .. 

HIIW~ F • Fllli7.AU 

CO• ~~ 9.lftll .AR1Bl.aaft to tho~~ !PCtti.Yt:~~ 8 :ASST EA IGJ~ ~o.t":f Boam 

HIR1 This 1e to aclo:low~"& Dr. ~strom.•e letter ot 22 Ju.1¥ art.a.ting that due to other obll::ations ha vill not bo ablo to boeono a ~bei­ or the NSAS.AB'! 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 06-20-2014 pur~uant to E .0. 1352a
#### William J. LOTT, Jr., Appellant, v. PARMELEE MOTOR FUEL COMPANY, a Pennsylvania Corporation.

No. 15151.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued May 7, 1965.

Decided May 17, 1965.

Donald E. Rohall, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.

Herman C. Kimpel, Dickie, McCamey, Chilcote & Robinson, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.

Before KALODNER, HASTIE and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we find no error.

The May 14, 1964 Order of the District Court will be affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 3.1 (i)

           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                      OF

                    MICROFLUIDICS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION



     It is hereby certified that:

1.   The name of the Corporation is Microfluidics International Corporation.

2.   The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended by
     striking out Article First in its entirety and by substituting in lieu
     thereof the following:

          "FIRST:   The name of the Corporation is MFIC Corporation."

3.   The amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation herein certified has been
     duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the
     General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

Executed effective as of July 9, 1999.

                                        MICROFLUIDICS INTERNATIONAL
                                        CORPORATION


                                        By:  /s/ Michael A. Lento
                                           -------------------------------
                                           Michael A. Lento
                                           President
Exhibit 
12(a)

                             XEROX CREDIT CORPORATION
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              (In Millions)

                         Three Months Ended
                             March 31,          Year Ended December 31,

                            1998   1997     1997    1996   1995   1994   
1993


Income before income taxes $  32  $  32    $ 123   $ 123  $ 119  $ 147  $ 
154

Fixed Charges:
   Interest expense (2)
     Xerox debt                2      2        3       5      6      5      
4
     Other debt               57     51      214     199    213    197    
205
       Total fixed charges    59     53      217     204    219    202    
209

Earnings available for
  fixed charges            $  91  $  85    $ 340   $ 327  $ 338  $ 349  $ 
363

Ratio of earnings to
  fixed charges (1)         1.54   1.60     1.57    1.60   1.54   1.73   
1.74


(1)  The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by dividing
     total earnings available for fixed charges by total fixed charges.

(2)  Debt has been assigned to discontinued operations based on the net 
assets of the discontinued operations and the debt-to-equity ratios in 
accordance with the Company's guideline. Beginning in 1995, the amount 
of interest expense that would have been allocated to discontinued 
operations was insignificant and therefore is now being reported within 
continuing operations and included in the fixed charges. Discontinued 
operations consist of the Company's third party financing and real 
estate businesses.     















(12)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Overseas Private Investment Corporation

# TIME AND DATE:

 Thursday, March 19, 2015, 2 p.m. (Open Portion); 2:15 p.m. (Closed Portion).

# PLACE:

 Offices of the Corporation, Twelfth Floor Board Room, 1100 New York Avenue NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

 Meeting OPEN to the Public from 2 p.m. to 2:15 p.m. Closed portion will commence at 2:15 p.m. (approx.)

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

1. President's Report

2. Tribute—Rajiv Shah

3. Tribute—Connie M. Downs

4. Minutes of the Open Session of the December 11, 2014 Board of Directors Meeting

# FURTHER MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED 

(Closed to the Public 2:15 p.m.):

1. Minutes of the Closed Session of the December 11, 2014 Board of Directors Meeting

2. Reports

3. Pending Projects

# CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION:

 Information on the meeting may be obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438.

Dated: February 27, 2015.

Connie M. Downs,

Corporate Secretary, Overseas Private Investment Corporation.

[FR Doc. 2015-04496 Filed 2-27-15; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 3210-01-P
[ 

i 

l 

... REF ID:A68678 

Lt. Color.cl :ll.a1nt Men\h ntlpU\Y Cllief ct ~r, ~ur.:.t, 

~rten 

·t • s. Ab." 1~ ~t:eurl V Se.nriee 

~~ Air For¢9 ~-!-"' T.-. 

~ Colcm<-'l ~' 

With re!~ ~ e.J.onel ~· lett.$r Q~ 4 D«:e:i~<hr 9ld to 

~ NplJ' o.t n Deoerib~ l9S'l., I • eaclo:d..~ m oi.4tli!la of tae 

t..lllO hour ~·ant.at.ion l u to &in at. t:.ie torthc01t:t.na c~ ~ttons 

~ocurl.\y ottie~' Contcronc•· The preftll.ta.t..icn will 1- uc~ 

lo' lantern .w., .. With best. vieh~5 !mt the •..aces!$ t4 tho Ccd'arance,. I .a, 

tfft1~i:l3 .. 

11.ILUA!i , • Pittm-1!.li 

Coonaul t..lnt. 

w .F ."!ried.'WJlm/oor/ eby /28 Jan S2 ?A~ 00493 

_ @'pp roved for Release by NSA on 08-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
REF ID:A68678 

OOMMUNICA'?IONS Drl'ELLIGRNCE 

outline ot Presenta:tt.on by Jllr. Willia r. Friedman, Consult.ant.., Armed 

P'orc.es 8eeuri V Agf!ll.lcy ~ at the Secom Ammal Communications Securit7 

otf'icers• Conterence to bo held. at Brooks ilr Fo:roe Base,, 3-7 March 1952. 

l. "Introductory rmarke 

2. Close inter-relationship betwen ca.mmunications secur:lt)r" (COHSFC) and 

coummications intelligeme ( COMIJIT) 

J. Impart.a.me ot COMIHT - (Dew.r-Marshall correspondence) 

4. Definitions and objectives o.r OOMINTJ limitatims imposed b.r eecurit7 

considerations 

s. Bl'1e.t histor;r or c:eyptoloa 

a. Anci.ent an:l ear~ cryptology 

b. Beginnings ot :modern cl';ptology 

c. Pericd 0£ AJflerican Revolutionary dqe 

d. The u. s. Civil war period 

•· The per'i.cd or decline, 16SS-l.915 

6. Cryptology during World War I 

a. Rev era in llili'ta17 communications and its ettacts on cryptoloa 

b. Tactical QBteus Q8ed' b;r the belligerents 

c. D1plo.matic aD1 high-1evel m:Uit&r.Y .,-.tans 

1. U. S. cr.vptol.ogl.c 111 tuation t'rom 1920 to Pearl Harbor 

a. Devalopnent ot 01"1Ptogi-apbic macbiner,y in the U •. s. and abroad 

b. Develotmnt ~ cryptanalytic machines and 'their •1gn1ticant 

.ttects on the whole ceyptolog;l.c tiel.d. 

8. Manner ot empJ.a,ment ot COHIHT 

a. The authentic but unwritten h1sto17 or mllitar,y ope.cations 

b. wor1d ..rar I ep1eodes 

c. Russo-1"imd.sh War 1940 

d. I.eve.lat.ions or Pearl Harbor iirvest1pt1ma 

e. D8t1e7-Marsball correspondence 

9. Logistic wpp<>rt, required tor a succesaf'ul. COMIJrl orpnisation .tar today 

10. Co-ordination of COMINT operations 'lfith tactical operat.tons and nee Y&rsa 

' ll. Security regulations for protection ot sources 

12. Stlnmal'7 

---·------
(EXHIBIT G)



# UAV Maintenance LOG

Drone Model/Type

Serial Number

No. Maintenance Issue Resolution Sign Off Date

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14(EXHIBIT G)



# UAV Maintenance LOG

Drone Model/Type

Serial Number

No. Maintenance Issue Resolution Sign Off Date

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

26

28
·'CLASSIFIED 

INCOMING 

MESSAGE 

RBSlfft!eft:!) 

S~A'l'E DEPT MSG 

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 

STAFF COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE 

PARAPHRASE HOT REQUIRED 

Fl'Om: Secret8?7 ot State sgd Webl> (Acting) 

To: US.AMBASSADOR Athens Greece 

Hr: 806 'll 

BALCOM 273 

UH Lake success reports proposed plan Combal. Jt.27. 

May 25 replace US enlisted radio operators with tm c1v111ans 

b7 nc means t1rm and that in 81\Y' event probabl7 be such later. 

mm 1ntormed ot poss1b111ey, but no ott1c1al reaction pending turther 1ntonnat1on. 

Repeat to USUN. New York 297 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-27-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

xom : 427 IS CM IN 5573 (26 M&J' 49) PO 

AC'l'ION1 PO 

XRPO : AP,, ID,, LOGD,, SIG 

CM Ilf 6931 (3 Jun 49) MO: 

)( .. ffEFER~NCf. flt.ED tM: 

,~:-~ 

2 I ......... ••••• •••••••••• 

CSGAS-80 

CSGAB-20 

1 J'1n/6Pm tcl/C 

,., - =. ·. ...... ~ · _,, : • ..1.. .._. ,_. ·~· • ~ - ',:; 

47 

~1 ~i:~~~ COPY NO. i 22::3 ........ , ••• • • • •••• CONFIDENTIAL - - - - - - - - -----~~~----------U~-GOVBl ... NM.~.~.l~.l~.~.ICE ....