alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
lliil•'7' 

w.-..--,~~~ 

.)ttae, Cli:at_ 

Dll!rWdt 

REF ID:A6683~~ 

.. ,. ....n .... \._ffhi~ .. ~~,., ~ - ... wl.l;, 

l ..n I ~ '"'°" 1~ • • JDb ~ la or • .,. e:.ctts~ 

lld Ill tiO..UO!\ dtb. S.t. I .-. -.. "1'..:i; to ad Ill '-1\ 

v!.t:h 

~~ 

,.. ,,... .... ..i v:r! tt ~--' 1'1'f. .... an or ~ 14.Vl !~ .. 1it1IO ~'°l:I ... T .,. ttla"at~ ta\d.n.; 

---ot~---..... 1 .......... ,. ...... . ~..-. PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

._,,,,~!1;{1 ? pt._, to m L'l ~\Mt~ jl ~ 

tillru.Jt. u ~~~ .. m ~ ~~ .,.,. tv .,.,, d"'*I 

~ "' ~ ~ ..... '191: 4:;d_~ this ~""°'· !f ., l ~.! UE ft~~·~ to ... J"ID • o~--tdl.l u -11 • _..111 a ~ e tb. .,... d:tw, ti/o •• wsut~ 

?. ~ ldll ~- :¥. ·~ 

ft@t. 1-t 1" ....... ~ ~ ~ "!t\ 1'fRI' ...... 

Wlfdl!!!l'W11!!1!1!111'9tL 

• • •• •lllJM',1' • 

oct JQ Oas 'tant; 

:~T (2) ~.~'«'ta~ com c/o S/AS<J'l 

If/a• °'• 'flobwt.son. !a ~ to --~~ t.o 1leet 'Id.th nr.,J lln n to tho "'1A..IJA"A'• llPOCi'1 study P'Cfi.P,. 

H.P.~~ A~ $).oob;; 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-20-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

L ...... .S..._ •
# CE2004078EN.01062903.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/629 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/629

---

(2004/C 78 E/0665)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3692/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(9 December 2003)

Subject:   Update on use of funding from the Daphne programme by the municipality of Siena

Subject:

In its answer to question E-1015/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Siena had submitted projects and secured funding under the Daphne programme, the Commission stated that a number of proposals had been submitted, but that the outcome of the assessment would be available in July 2003.

1

Can the Commission say whether the projects submitted actually received funding and, if not, why they were not considered suitable?

Have any other projects been submitted in the meantime?

Joint answer

to Written Questions E-3690/03, E-3691/03 and E-3692/03

given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(19 January 2004)

(19 January 2004)

In 2003 the Daphne programme received the following proposals from the municipalities in question:

| — | two proposals from the municipality of Florence: Education and Youth Policy Department, Education Unit; |
| --- | --- |

—

two proposals from the municipality of Florence: Education and Youth Policy Department, Education Unit;

| — | one proposal for the municipality of Pesaro: Social Services; |
| --- | --- |

—

one proposal for the municipality of Pesaro: Social Services;

| — | one proposal from the municipality of Siena: Equal Opportunities Committee. |
| --- | --- |

—

one proposal from the municipality of Siena: Equal Opportunities Committee.

The Commission did not accept these proposals for Community funding because they were not of the required quality.

The applicants were duly informed of this decision as well as of the reasons why the proposals were rejected. Moreover, in its correspondence, the Commission indicated which aspects of the proposal needed to be improved.

It also stated that new proposals could, of course, be submitted under the next call for proposals in 2004.

Since there was no further call for proposals in 2003, the Commission did not receive any other proposal.

---

(1)  OJ C 51 E, 26.2.2004, p. 62.

1

---
I I 

1 

1 

i 

I 

, 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I I 

11 11 I 111 

I I I 

I 

}111 1 11i1 

II Ill 

J-~ ~.a~·J.~ 

~A-~~Fi~ 

t 

• 

~ -

i r 

roved for Release b NSA on 05-21-2014 

I I ,1 

" 

11 I 

ti 

f 

11 ' 

'. 

r 

• 

• ' 

I I 

,, 

I Ii 

I'"' 

I I 

•I
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Interactive Data Corporation (the Company) for the
year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Andrew J. Hajducky III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                                                                              
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | 
|Dated: February 27, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    ANDREW J. HAJDUCKY III                                                
|                         |  |  |  | Andrew J. Hajducky III Chief Financial Officer (principal accounting officer)
# CE2004088EN.01053701.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/537 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/537

---

(2004/C 88 E/0549)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0810/04

by José Ribeiro e Castro (UEN) to the Commission

(8 March 2004)

Subject:   Mozambique — Nampula — murder of a missionary

Subject:

On 24 February Doraci Edinger, a 53-year-old Brazilian Lutheran Church missionary (for the Igreja Evangélica de Confissão Luterano no Brasil), who was involved in school- and hospital-building projects and in well-sinking projects to supply water to the region, was found dead in the flat where she had been living, in Nampula.

Given that the motive does not appear to have been robbery, rumours have emerged that this brutal crime was linked to the organ-trafficking apparently taking place in the region.

The autopsy has shown that the missionary was killed by blows from a hammer. Five suspects have already been detained in connection with her death.

Within the religious community, and especially among the Catholic nuns who have spoken out against the organ-trafficking, the fear of reprisals is mounting.

The Commission:

| — | what information does it have about these matters; |
| --- | --- |

—

what information does it have about these matters;

| — | what measures has it taken or will it take to guarantee the security of the religious and missionaries working in Nampula, especially those who are Union citizens? |
| --- | --- |

—

what measures has it taken or will it take to guarantee the security of the religious and missionaries working in Nampula, especially those who are Union citizens?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(5 April 2004)

(5 April 2004)

The Commission is aware of the murder of the Brazilian nun Doraci Edinger and contacted the Embassy of Brazil in this respect, which, on the basis of the available information, considers that there is no connection with alleged organ trafficking cases.

Regarding the nuns' safety, although this matter falls outside the Commission's competence and can be best addressed through interventions from the respective Member State Embassies, the Commission will examine within the framework of the EU co-ordination and EU-Mozambique political dialogue the most appropriate way to raise this issue with the government.

The Honourable Member can be assured that the Commission, within the limits of its competence, will maintain contact with the Attorney's General office and the Human Rights League and follow the progress of the investigation.

---
Doc ID: 2984303
Doc ID: 2984303
Doc ID: 2984303
Doc ID: 2984303
Doc ID: 2984303
Doc ID: 2984303
Doc ID: 2984303
Doc ID: 2984303
Doc ID: 2984303
Doc ID: 2984303
Doc ID: 2984303
Doc ID: 2984303
Doc ID: 2984303
Doc ID: 2984303
Doc ID: 2984303
Doc ID: 2984303
Doc ID: 2984303
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
       
<S>                                                 <C>   
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              698,574 
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4,162,829
<ALLOWANCES>                                        753,804
<INVENTORY>                                         125,525
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4,954,679
<PP&E>                                           12,126,121
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1,657,701
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   28,332,710
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7,451,143
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                         215,913
<COMMON>                                             53,131
<OTHER-SE>                                       10,774,618 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     28,332,710
<SALES>                                          14,448,523
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 14,731,326
<CGS>                                             6,915,503
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    17,188,669
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1,120,106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           0
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (3,577,449)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (2,952,107)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     169,566
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (6,359,990)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .34
        

</TABLE>
REF ID:A67348 

-RESlR\elUT 

:RBS!AICA'D .. SifJUR:I ft '.fll'm:tlft('Jlf 6Kuch19S3 ..... - ! IP l 

.MJ1X)RAIOOff to COWIEL WDWlt 

80.BJECt 1 Jteqteat. tor Clearance 

l. neaee ascertain as qu!.ckl.7 u poss1ble 1ibe clearance at.at.us 

of tho f.'ollo'lllng pel'8on vbo llaa accepted 1m 1m'itat1.on _, beeome a 

aMber at the .Apacy•a SC1ent.U1o .ldTJ.ao17 Boc'd• 

IUD,. Val tel' bDl!Oll Oa11 

D .. 0 .. 1. - ;J:J love,. .. wr 1891 

P.0.9. • Lockport., lew '!ow 

aa.. addreu1 J&7 1q street. $Jra0Use,. 1. r. 

Du1nesa addressa General Electric Coa..""8J1J'• S71"M11n, I. Y. 

S>TB1 Dr. Baka 1• Vice Prest.dent and Oeneral llanager or the 

llectrons.o• D1Y1sion, o .. nl ll.10t.r.10 ec:.p1V. • 1• 

& .. bar ot the Sipal Cor~ b&earch ml Dilveloi-nt 

A.dvlao17 Co\\YlCUJ be t.e_or ,.., alllo a ...t.r ot the 

l:t.ect.l"Old.cs nt.v1alon ot \I-. K.S.tions '!oard. Re t.hera• 

tore pn>bablJ al.ready bas a cloa.r.mce .tor 'fop Secret 

lDto:rmatt.on. 

2. If posll1bl.• to ol:ata1.n • prev.touaq coapl.eted PBS, w collld llflll4 

b1a a eop7 theroot and aak Ma llU'917 to bd.111 it up to date. Ve cc .. t. .tJ.n&crpl"'lnt.s., U m>t. &1.J'u.d'.1 on nicord1 next i;.ble 1- co=as to 1'181t 

•• 

00 I Dr. Lid.bl.er 

Dr. Cld..rDa 

-UESTRISTE~· 1 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-30-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
·~. 

A.;.::' ' 

.. ';, ...... 

•' 

. . 

,_. 

"; 

I.~· 

: \ 

1,• ... ; 

~·· 

• . 

• ,

. \ 

... 

:· 

1 

.. ·+. 

' 

.. ,. 

:,_ 

":f,. 

".-."\-. 

·, ....... 

. . ·" .. 

. .... ·-.. 

.. - .. , 

REF ID:A99874. 

NOTES OU Am'GVX sor.iITlUU 

It w;cs not r.ssumed thut two of the messages ware or the !3:-me length; 

that was 11ui ta an accident of which WP were enabled to take advantage. 

such an ~ccurance 1a not necessazy. However 1 t mi&-llt bB pointed out 

that its occurrence wna more fre~uent thr.n would occur by chance due to 

the Oem+ proot:ice of brealci~ up long mesa~ea into shorter sect1ona 1 

aent aepa,rateq. 

could ~et~!d:e:~~; t:! !::t::m:n•!::P~:~ ~~: ~~: ~:!~~d::m:h::·~:;on odd or even. ~hen two mess~ea differing by a number of letters equal 

to a J1111ltlple of the length of the key could be treated 1n exactly the 

:::~d·~~~t:: !::1~:~~:: :~ei!::i! :~i::~~·ha~~~a!~~o~::·;~:. messa&es ~n aey dny' s traffic. (ct. Publication anti tled, Geman Milita~ 

Ciphers from :Veb. to lloT. 1918, by J.R. Childs, P. 13 par. 2. 11!1.he number 

of measa&bs which were intercepted in the cipher (ADFlaVX J varied from 25 

a dq upor the inception of the system to cs great a number aa 148 during 

the last i!n.Y• of Mq"). 

I 

. r-r.·.- . •·. ~A.··-

~ ... -- · .. .,·~~..:.. 

--

~· 

· . 

·!'=--" 

~"·"· k .:,,_,.._ 

'a-=·. " 

~h1alassumption of width would answer all the object1ons about using pets 

of ten le~ters and would peimit the dete:mdnation of where the reversal talma 

place w1t{1out an,y particular diff1cu.lt7. In fact the correct assumption would · · •. 

lead to a; ready d.etezm1nat1on of the breaks between the various columns. 

r:--~ •. - I 

I ... ~he ~1mul teneoue appearance of V and X in poa1 tions 22 and 23 ia of -. . : 

ouatondin~ importmice because of the difference in frequency of these 

two letters in the two tables. It is by no means the same phenomenon as the repetitio~s at 14-15, 44-45, eta. I 

• • • • • 

It 1~ certainl.T tru.e that the solution aa given takes advuntf1&9' of 

the parti,:tilar messages at hand. Thia is a pecu11a.r1 ty of Crn>tona]7'•i• 

i taelf. ft is not possible to give n general F1olut1on for a. cipher qstem 

ln the 8Hlf18 wcy that one co.n give a general solution for n problem in 

J.1athemat1~s. In C:eyptanalysis general pr1n.c1μles may be laid down, but 

then 1lluatrat101\ requires a pnrticukr exmiple which of neceaai t7 1s in some 

respects ~11lm 'lffT other particular example • 

I 

•" .... L., lo ... ••"lo•• •C.O,. •I••,. 1•• 

. ...... .. 

., . - ,. :·I ':, • .• ,. .... "", ,:,, ... "t"' yl'r--~ .... '• .. , . 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-30-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

.. ':.!;,-... . . , .....
~.:.. .. 

2. M-2.) AS-«> 8 &fa7 47 Feu:r Jt,iotoetbtw.d OOtl1ea ot the lncleeurea weten..xt 1o 

la pmagraJil '~ J.oticin l llaw bMft ~r'!Cd at the"*' ... , ot &ecur1• Dbiel.aa. or tboee tom- oopk'#.t, ., ue 

•lftl retained SW the 1)t.yUfat tU., eat be.a ~- har.dOU"ri.od to the Cbii!f, fl~ !ahoratoi-!.ee Dtvts!m Uk.If · 

Oii& ~SD attached JMyi•n1tb toi- lrOCb 4letribution .. '8-2) Jrll*t doetre. 

4 I.'lt!l.a 

•ddecJ 2 Incl.a 

J. Pbotc=it.atto OOi'lJ' of 

xau tree "°• nm, 14 A.pr 4'1, eub.J 

91i1111tot17 C~!et .. tiona Olt.to~~t1Te8 • •/il Smls 

•· anm:v Ch!et, ~'<l"!t;y Di•l#im 

~kcl.'41 

4. ftot-oata.tio oow or ho 

6'Cll CXSSt;O, 1'1 A'f*" 41, ,, • ... , wlJ. lm.l...... .. ~ .. -••-· -• ---·--·-·-------·-·--r·illl...,.. -...,.-R•·:.1-...,.l!l•-·•-rw-·•-•· _, __ ,____ .,,,..,. . .,_. __ 11 

... - J 

Declassified and Approved for Release by NSA on 03-13-2014 pursuant to E.O. 13526, FOIA Case# 0 

2 

--·---------
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1762 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to increase the penalties 

applicable to aliens who unlawfully reenter the United States after being 

removed. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 14, 2015 

Mr. CRUZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to increase 

the penalties applicable to aliens who unlawfully reenter 

the United States after being removed. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Establishing Manda5 tory Minimums for Illegal Reentry Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASED PENALTIES FOR REENTRY OF RE7 MOVED ALIENS. 

8 Section 276 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

9 (8 U.S.C. 1326) is amended— 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1762 IS

1 (1) in subsection (a), in the matter following 

2 paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘fined under title 18, 

3 United States Code, or imprisoned not more than 2 

4 years, or both’’ and inserting ‘‘imprisoned not less 

5 than 5 years and not more than 6 years’’; and 

6 (2) in subsection (b)— 

7 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘fined 

8 under title 18, United States Code, imprisoned 

9 not more than 10 years, or both’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘imprisoned not less than 5 years and not more 

11 than 10 years, and may, in addition, be fined 

12 under title 18, United States Code’’; 

13 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘fined 

14 under such title, imprisoned not more than 20 

15 years, or both’’ and inserting ‘‘imprisoned not 

16 less than 5 years and not more than 20 years 

17 and may, in addition, be fined under such 

18 title’’; and 

19 (C) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘fined 

20 under title 18, United States Code, imprisoned 

21 for not more than 10 years, or both’’ and in22 serting ‘‘imprisoned for not less than 5 years 

23 and not more than 10 years and may, in addi24 tion, be fined under such title’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 10.6**

FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (the“Amendment”) is made this 31st day of December 2008 between BIOMET, INC., an Indiana corporation (“Biomet”), and Steven F. Schiess (“Executive”). All capitalized terms used herein shall have themeanings ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement (defined below), unless otherwise defined herein. 

WHEREAS, Biomet and Executiveentered into that certain Employment Agreement dated as of February 28, 2008 (the “Employment Agreement”); and 

WHEREAS, Biomet and Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth herein; 

NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Biomet and Executive hereby agree as follows: 

1. Section 9(e):****Termination by the Company Other Than For Cause, Death or Disability, or by the Executive for Good Reason, Following aChange of Control. Section 9(e)(i) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to delete the final sentence of Section 9(e)(i) in its entirety and replace it with the following: 

“The total amount of the Change of Control Severance Benefit will be paid: (1) if the Change in Control constitutes a change in control eventwithin the meaning of Treasury Regulation 1.409A-3(i)(5), in a lump sum as soon as administratively practicable (but in no event later than 30 days) following the Date of Termination or (2) if the Change of Control does not constitute a changein control event within the meaning of Treasury Regulation 1.409A-3(i)(5), in equal, ratable installments in accordance with the Company’s regular payroll policies over the course of the Non-Compete Period.” 

2. Miscellaneous. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This Amendmentmay be executed in two (2) or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 

*    *    *    *    * 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this First Amendment to Employment Agreement on thedate first set forth above. 

 
BIOMET, INC.By: 
/s/ Bradley J. Tandy
Name: Bradley J. TandyTitle: Senior Vice President, General Counsel & SecretaryEXECUTIVE
/s/ Steven F. Schiess
Name: Steven F. Schiess
.. 'lOi> ili:Q~ B. S. EF.SB E!iLY 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

SUBJECT NUMBER 

USCIB: 29.5/10 

Subject: 

PL 86'-36/50 USC 3605 

Item 2 of the Agenda for the ll3th:Meeting of USCIB, 

held on 11 March 1955. 

(USCIB 29.5/9). 

The ACTING CHAIRMAN (General Cabell) explained that the Executive 

Committee has recommended certain amendments (USCIB 29. 5/9) to the basic 

AITrI¥ proposal contained in USCIB 29.5/6. He invited comments. 

MR. SHELDON said that he would like to recommend one minor change, 

namely, the deletion of the phrase rrnot to" in line 3 of paragraph 2c, 

11Inclosure 511 , with USCIB 29. 5/6, and the substitution therefor the 

following phrase: 11will be limited to an absolute minimum and in no case 

will". 

There were no objections to this proposal, or to the basic proposal as 

otherwise amended by the Executive Committee. 

DECISION: (11 March 1955) USCIB approved the U.S. A-rary proposal contained 

in USCIB 29.5/6, as amended by USCIB 2!}.5/9 and the amendment to 11Inclosure 5" 

presented by the CIA member in the foregoing discussion. 

This'item. to be dropped from the agenda. 

USCIB: 29.5/10 - 4 -

TOP SECRET 

eclassified and a roved for release b NSA on 09-29-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2
                                                                    ------------

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Registration Statement of our report dated February 2, 1999
included in Open Market, Inc.'s Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 1998
and to all references to our Firm included in this Registration Statement.





                                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
August 6, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          196564
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2605615
<ALLOWANCES>                                     55675
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3454157
<PP&E>                                           30935
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4702
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3534390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6599418
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     706758
<COMMON>                                      40824296
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3534390
<SALES>                                        4484339
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4484339
<CGS>                                          4555215
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4555215
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               60555
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (103986)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (103986)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (103986)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (103986)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements, on (i) Form S-3 (Nos. 333-25995, 333-62155, 333-33726, 333-54616 and
333-55866), (ii) Form S-4 (No. 333-50898) and (iii) Form S-8 (No. 333-56343)
of Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. of our report dated February 14, 2001
relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which
appears in this Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Houston, Texas

April 27, 2001