alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          20,072
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  138,071
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,698
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150,132
<PP&E>                                       2,963,033
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,633,811
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 480,404
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          472,641
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       799,187
<OTHER-SE>                                   (846,592)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   480,404
<SALES>                                        117,301
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               189,217
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,284
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               159,653
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,720)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (29,720)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (29,720)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (004)
        

</TABLE>
Chief' J. O. Williams 

SUSLO Unit, Box 55 

u.s. llavy 100 

New York, Nev York 

Dear Chief' Willianuu 

REF ID:A64625 

310 Second Street, S.E. 

Washington 3, D. c .. 

21 October 1954 

Thank you very- much ~or your letter ~ 14 October inclosing 

the letter trom the Staples Presa. I am. ver.r aorcy that I didn • t 

t'ollov up my thought when I aav thia exhibition about a. year ago 

in London. Kov it is too late and ve will just have to drop the 

idea or getting the exhibition over here. But please buy for me: 

one umQOunted cow o:f the 11Tree ot Altiiabeta, n mentioned in their 

letter. 

Your situation Yith regard to the houee in Alexandria ia 

rather trying I think. I will aak. Mi:-s .. :Friedman to take the time 

to go out there herself' and aee what' a vbat. MIQrbe she will have 

a f'riend in the real. estate business 'Who will have aome idea. as 

to who would best represent you. I will let you know the outcome 

o't this as soon a.a I can. 

I would be appreciative if you vouJ.d buy tor me the item 

which is indicated in handwriting on the inclosed. slip. The item 

Jll,.tmber is, as you see 1 Number 89 in a recent catalog put out by 

the firm whose address 18 given on the slip. Al.so, voul.d you 

please try to bey for ne a. cow or the following booki 

Moore 1 William. 11Shake1SIJ!:are .. 11 Published in 1934, by 

Cornish Brothers, J..td., 39 Kev Street, Birmingham.. 

Please start an account for '111;:/" purchases, including cost ot 

postage, and I'll send a check vhen settling. 

By the way, I received. the package ot books you sent me, and 

al.so the p.lCkage t'rom Seltridges .. 

Sincerely, 

WILLIAM F. FRIEWAN 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-16-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
# CE2004088EN.01026101.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/261 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/261

---

(2004/C 88 E/0266)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0980/04

by Luigi Vinci (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(30 March 2004)

Subject:   Instructions from the Army High Command in Turkey

Subject:

In January, with the subsequent approval of Military Headquarters, the Army High Command in Turkey instructed its own intelligence services and provincial governments to gather information on members of the public and organisations in favour of Turkey entering the European Union, in favour of the United States or with Satanist and Masonic links and on Internet groups, minorities, children of well-off families, etc. In the High Command's view, all such persons and organisations could become involved in separatist or subversive activities.

This initiative has been fiercely criticised in the Turkish press.

Despite the brutally anti-democratic nature of this intrusion, which is hostile to Turkey's entry to the European Union and, furthermore, is in breach of Turkish law, The Turkish Government does not appear to have raised any objections.

What are the Commission's views on this matter, and what action does it intend to take in response to this behaviour with a view to upholding the Copenhagen principles in general and to facilitating the democratisation process within Turkey agreed between the Turkish Government and the European Union?

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(30 April 2004)

(30 April 2004)

The Commission is aware of the events to which the Honourable Member refers.

Under the revised Accession Partnership as adopted by the Council of Ministers on 19 May 2003, there is a priority for Turkey to align civilian control of the military with practice in Member States.

In its last Regular Report of November 2003 (1), the Commission noted that ‘the Armed Forces in Turkey exercise influence through a series of informal mechanisms. At various occasions, military members of the National Security Council expressed their opinions about political, social and foreign policy matters in public speeches, statements to the media and declarations.’

1

On 16 March 2004, the Turkish General Staff published a Statement concerning the above-mentioned facts denying any intention of the army to give specific orders to compile any blacklist of people according to their politicai view or lifestyle. The statement indicated however that it was the duty of the Armed forces to carry out activities against ‘separatist and fundamentalist threats’. These facts triggered a debate in the Turkish Parliament in the course of which the question was raised of the compatibility of this type of intelligence gathering with the principle of freedom of thought.

The Commission will continue to follow the developments related to civil-military relations in Turkey in light of the Copenhagen political criteria and where necessary raise it directly with the Turkish authorities.

---

(1)  COM(2003) 676 final.

1

---
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1774 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to treat Puerto Rico as 

a State for purposes of chapter 9 of such title relating to the adjustment 

of debts of municipalities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 15, 2015 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. NELSON, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Ms. WARREN, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. REID, Mr. 

MURPHY, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. HEINRICH, and Ms. HIRONO) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to treat Puerto 

Rico as a State for purposes of chapter 9 of such title 

relating to the adjustment of debts of municipalities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Puerto Rico Chapter 

5 9 Uniformity Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

7 Section 101(52) of title 11, United States Code, is 

8 amended to read as follows: 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1774 IS

1 ‘‘(52) The term ‘State’ includes Puerto Rico 

2 and, except for the purpose of defining who may be 

3 a debtor under chapter 9 of this title, includes the 

4 District of Columbia.’’. 

5 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT. 

6 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub7 section (b), this Act and the amendment made by this Act 

8 shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

9 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.—The amendment 

10 made by this Act shall apply with respect to— 

11 (1) cases commenced under title 11 of the 

12 United States Code on or after the date of the en13 actment of this Act; and 

14 (2) debts, claims, and liens created before, on, 

15 or after such date. 

16 SEC. 4. SEVERABILITY. 

17 If any provision of this Act or any amendment made 

18 by this Act, or the application of such provision or amend19 ment to any person or circumstance, is held to be uncon20 stitutional, the remainder of this Act and the amendments 

21 made by this Act, or the application of that provision or 

22 amendment to other persons or circumstances, shall not 

23 be affected. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Jackpot's
Consolidated Balance Sheets - March 31, 1997 and June 30, 1996 and its
Consolidated Statements of Income - three and nine months ended March 31, 1997
and 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          43,914
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,741
<PP&E>                                          34,561
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,881
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,292
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,672
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            97
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,351
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,292
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,462
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,469
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,945
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,463
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,482
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .59
        

</TABLE>
# CE2004088EN.01055901.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/559 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/559

---

(2004/C 88 E/0570)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1004/04

by Daniel Hannan (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(31 March 2004)

Subject:   Threat to peace and democracy in Adjara

Subject:

The autonomous Georgian region of Adjara, which is self-governing in accordance with the Georgian Constitution, survived thirteen years of threats to its peace and stability from the ousted regime of Eduard Shevardnadze. Now, in 2004, Adjara, which fully acknowledges the overall authority of the central government in Tbilisi, faces renewed threats of destabilisation from the recently-elected government of President Mikhail Saakashvili. On Sunday, 14 March, armoured personnel carriers and heavily armed troops appeared at the administrative border of Adjara. It is feared that such attempts are being made with a view to undermining the due process of the forthcoming parliamentary elections (on 27 March 2004).

Would the Commission agree that regional issues should be resolved through peaceful dialogue without the threat of military force; that elections are best conducted in an atmosphere of stability and trust; and that the appearance of the Georgian National Guard on the streets of a hitherto peaceful and economically successful region, where the President's party has little support, would constitute an act of aggression against the citizens of Georgia by their own government?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(23 April 2004)

(23 April 2004)

The Commission would draw the attention of the Honourable Member to the Declaration by the Presidency on behalf of the European Union concerning the situation in the Georgian Autonomous Republic of Adjara issued on 17 March 2004. In this statement, the parties were urged to refrain from any further escalation which could result in violence. It also urged the authorities of the Georgian Autonomous Republic of Ajara to respect human rights, democratic principles and the rule of law and to allow for the orderly preparations for free and fair parliamentary elections.

The Commission also draws the Honourable Member's attention to the Declaration issued by the Presidency on behalf of the EU concerning the Georgian parliamentary elections. His attention is particularly drawn to the reference to the preliminary conclusions of the International Election Observation Mission (IEOM) and the concern the IEOM had over the complete lack of commitment by the authorities of Adjara to guarantee sufficient conditions for the conduct of a meaningful democratic election in that region. In this Declaration, the Georgian authorities are also encouraged to work constructively with the Organisation on Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and the Council of Europe, to further democratisation.

The Commission continues to urge the central government in Tbilisi and the authorities in Batumi to work towards finding a peaceful solution acceptable to all and in the interest of Georgia.

---
REF ID:A64702 

Mr. •~ V. lerton Jr. •u !!81-pbone l'Abon\tortu, Inc .. ~ IUl I.abore.toq ~ IUl, Bev J.-raey 

..,. Mr.- lorton• 

l'h1• 1a to MU.ovl..9d0t rec:t1pt ot ~ letter of 

ll hptqber l.9~ .. 

lotion hi.a \Malla W\1ated. to havtt ~vel ~ 1ffuti4 

u rep•ted to:r YOW" vat• ci 18 Md 19 hpt.eab9r l9~· 

Ir t.M1 .n avail.OJA, % Will ffnd tb:el t.o JOU prior to ,~ ~urt tor Vuh~J it J)Ot, JOU m¥ plok ~ 

\Ii' bmt att.r f®r -.n-l val, *> t.bfq _, 'be Wli4 b obtain1- niliburMJQiut tw 10'l.it t:ravel npenaee. 

Ve vi U 1- loald.116 t0l"Va.1:"d 'to llff !:.la JOU er>. 88 lept•dxu· 

U4. will Mb uq •terlal 70U ._, •1•h to ... av-aile,l)le to 

fl)U .. 

VIWAM 1. ftnutrJI .. mit1Y9 1-eoreter/ 

&A lc19!ltitie M• 1lt0r)' btd 

cc: AfJ 

C/8 ~~~~)(;:R, AelmoVledgment of Mr. Horton'• J.tr er 

&/ASST (Mr. J'ri.VUJ.IJI~ 13 Sept 54. Im'ol'lll8.t1on pertaining to hi• 

PERS (NS.ARC) v1•1't to ?iSA. on 28 - 29 Sept 54. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-17-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
  We hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus constituting part of this
Registration Statement on Form S-1 of our report dated March 13, 1998, relating
to the financial statements and selected per-unit data and ratios of the
Aggressive Equity Fund, Balanced Fund, Growth Equity Fund, Stable Asset Return
Fund, Index Equity Fund, Intermediate Bond Fund, International Equity Fund,
Value Equity Fund, Conservative Structured Portfolio Service, Moderate
Structured Portfolio Service and Aggressive Structured Portfolio Service, each
a fund or portfolio of the American Bar Association Members/State Street
Collective Trust, which appear in such Prospectus. We also consent to the
references to us under the headings "Selected Financial Data" and "Experts" in
such Prospectus.
 
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 21, 1998
POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints each of Robert K. Kretzman and Michael T. Sheehan or any of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the REVLON, INC. (the Corporation) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Form 10-K) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form 10-K or amendments thereto,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any applicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents 4th day of March, 2008.



/S/ ALAN S. BERNIKOWALAN S. BERNIKOW






---
p«f«J 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

GOJET AIRLINES, LLC. 

(Windshield Ice) 

M l - 2 2Q10 

HEARING DOCKET 

FAA Docket No. CP10CE0004 

DMS No. FAA-2010-0190 

Judge: ALJ Richard C. Goodwin 

NOTICE OF DEPOSITION 

To: David Kessler, ESQ. 

FAA/Central Region 

Office of Regional Counsel 

901 Locust. Room 506 

Kansas City, Missouri 64106-2641 

C 3 

Please take notice that at 2:00 p.m. on June 11, 2010 at St. Louis Flight 

Standards District Office, 10801 Pear Tree Lane, Suite 200, St. Ann, Missouri 

Respondent's Counsel will take the oral deposition of Gary Cooper, before a Notary 

Public or before some other officer authorized by law to administer oaths. Said 

deposition will be recorded by stenographic means and will continue until such time as it 

is complete. 

Dated: (Yi^ u 95 , ^0) 0 Respe5tf^lly/s<ibraitted, 

- ^ 

David J. A. Rayes III, Esq. 

Vice President & General Counsel 

Trans States Holdings, Inc. 

11495 Navaid Road 

Bridgeton, Missouri 63044 

Phone: (314)222-4316 

Fax: (314)222-4311 

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT 

GOJET AIRLINES LLC 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I David J.A. Hayes, III, hereby certify that on May ^ , 2010,1 served the 

foregoing Notice of Deposition on the following parties' counsel or designated 

representative at the address indicated via facsimile & U.S. Mail, postage prepaid. 

Original & One Copy: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

One Copy: 

David B. Kessler 

Office of Regional Counsel 

Central Region, ACE-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

DOT Building 

901 Locust, Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, ALJ 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590
EXHIBIT 11.1


		  JACKPOT ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES 
		   COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE 
		 THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND 1995
	    (Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>

							      1996      1995
							     ______    _______
<S>                                                          <C>       <C>
Primary:  
  Earnings:                                            
    Net income                                               $1,573    $ 1,802
							     ======    =======
  Shares:
    Weighted average number of common shares 
      outstanding (A)                                         9,355      9,302
							     ======    =======
Primary earnings per share                                   $  .17    $   .19
							     ======    =======
Fully diluted (B):
  Earnings:
    Net income                                               $1,573    $ 1,802
    Add after-tax interest, net (C)                              39        338
							     ______    _______
    Net income, as adjusted                                  $1,612    $ 2,140
							     ======    =======
  Shares:
    Weighted average number of common shares 
      outstanding                                             9,355      9,302
    Common shares issuable upon exercise of stock
      options and warrants, net of common shares 
      assumed to be repurchased from the proceeds 
      using the greater of the average market price 
      for the period or the period-end price                    226      1,983
							     ______    _______
    Weighted average number of common shares and common
      share equivalents outstanding, as adjusted              9,581     11,285
							     ======    =======

Fully diluted earnings per share                             $  .17    $   .19
							     ======    =======
</TABLE>
(A)  Common shares issuable upon exercise of stock options and warrants, net 
     of common shares assumed to be repurchased from the proceeds at the 
     average market price for the period have been excluded from the 
     computation because they had no effect on primary earnings per share.

(B)  These calculations are submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K 
     Item 601 (b) (ii) although not required by Footnote 2 to paragraph 
     14 of APB Opinion No. 15 because they had no effect on earnings per 
     share.  

(C)  Amounts represent a decrease in interest expense and an increase in 
     interest income as a result of the assumed reduction in borrowings
     and increase in investments in U. S. government securities from the
     application of the portion of the proceeds from the assumed exercise 
     of stock options and warrants which were not applied towards the 
     repurchase of outstanding common shares (equivalent to 20% of the 
     common shares outstanding at the end of the applicable period).
99-727.

#### King v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co.

Monroe App. No. 807.

Cook, J.,

dissents and would hold this cause for the decision in 99-342, 99-348 and 99-618, *Holcomb v. State Farm Ins. Cos.,*Franklin App. No. 98AP-353.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.
fit suet ton unto rou suis shit erints of wy srtile "Codes,
and Ciphers", Tihave'a letter from

: Just’ whe! se senat by the Ina cima ‘Cmout
peaeigehirart 1 em not, sure.

$39 022“ ‘eransportation. ‘additional
ae rensportation additional’