alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PL86-36/50 USC 3605 

Dear Dr. Jlar.ritu 

General Canine bu ••ked. 108 to tell )'OU how pleuad 

he i• with your acceptrmce or h!• iuv1tat1on to Btllbel"lhip 

on the Mathematica Panel ot the lational Security Agency 

Seient1f'1c Mvisor;y »oar.1 • 

.Aa 7ou mtQ7" know, the proceaai~ re¢nd tor granting 

aocesa to ktionoJ. Securu.y Apnc¥ m.tte:r"8 require• ~ch 

time. In ;rout> cue, t.hit procit•llini; vill be initiated. u 

•oon u w receive the J"equirfi!d. forms troti you. 

At thi• tim let • thatlk you tor :your acce,ptimce 

ot tM invitation; a1nee it u 11341cat1v• at ,your 1AteN11t 

io u4 ••tiate or the ~e ot tho :proble1M With vtrl.ch 

w lllWlt eon.tend 1n the iutoreat ot tbe uational Ollf'ense. 

cc: AG 

c/s s/ ASST (Mr. Friedman) 

S:ine.:rtrJ.¥, 

WILLIAM P. 1Jtl!lltAJW 

lxecu.tive heretaq 

EA Scientittc Advillorf loard. 

M/R: Acknowledgment of Dr. Harris' ltr dtd 19 Mar 54. Dr. Harris 

accepts Gen. Canine'& invitation for .membership on tl}e ~them.tics 

Panel ot the NSASAB. ?#'Sa.....c-e(_ F-,P~ ~ ,.A"r"OcC. 

M..M.lelerski/S/ASST/tlJ493/ 29Mar 54 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
r • ..::%:.' • - • 'L• ' ~ 

REF ID:A64165_ 

SECREl 

MW! 

~ !'Sm 22LQRB!r PAVH1 't/P 

Reterencet Teletype Measage :tram Colonel 1'.ans1.ng, KS.A tiai1on Group, 

lentagon (Attached)* 

l. With rt!feronce to the ~·--a• which ia cited in the reference 

Ind vhi,c,:1h 11 bttil>S returned. h&rvvith, I took the -.tter up with :Mr .. W. 

l>&rJt Armstl'OJ1g, Jr., Special Alsiatant to trut Secretary or Ste.te1 and 

attached hereto his action in rel'J:ponse tQ my inquiry .. 

2~ It vould appeo.r that the State Ilepi.l"trcant and the Military 

Bi•toria.n have cone to eome ~nt vi.th ngard to the message or 

mees&geii lthich are to be mentioned. in the torthcomit\g State Department 

pu'blf.ca.tion. However, Mr. A.rmat!'O!lg did not include 1n his memorandum. 

&l.1,Y' COl."lllent on that part ~ the Lanaing mieaeage \thich MYS " ••• and. 

vould inclUde article describing the U.S. auccess in intercepting and 

decoding Je.pmeee tra.t't1c oe:rore and t!llring the War. 11 

3. It is 11uggested. that the text or amoh an article ought 

properly be wbmi tted. to the I>ireatoi .. , ltSA, for clearance. Perhaps 

Colonel. te.nasins can get trcn the Mill tar;y Ri•torian or tram Jl'.Q a 

copy ot Vb.at u proposed to be incl.u.ded Wlder thi• heading and give 

us & che.n.c& to look it over. 

Inol1 

a/• 

\l!LLIAM P. !'RIEIJ.Wf 

apec1al Aa•iatant 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-09-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
The Attorney General of Texas 

August 11, 1978 

JOHN L. HILL 

Attorney General 

Honorable Neal Pfeiffer 

Criminal District Attorney 

P. 0. Box 753 

Bastrop, Texas 78602 

Opinion No. H- 12 2 8 

Re: Whether it is a violation of 

article 15.71 of the Election 

Code to offer to hire a vehicle 

or person to operate a vehicle 

for the purpose of conveying 

voters to a polling place. 

Dear Mr. Pfeiffer: 

You have requested an opinion regarding article 15.71 of the Election 

Code which provides: 

Whoever hires any vehicle or hires any person to 

operate a vehicle for the purpose of conveying voters 

to the polling place, or rewards any person in money or 

other thing of value for procuring a vehicle or a driver 

for such purpose, shall be fined not exceeding five 

hundred dollars. This article shall not be construed to 

prohibit a voter from paying for the services of a 

vehicle or a driver for the purpose of conveying him to 

the polling place or to prevent him from allowing other 

voters to ride in the vehicle with him while he is going 

to the polling place in order to vote or returning 

therefrom after having voted. 

You ask whether an attempt or offer to pay someone to drive voters to the 

polls is unlawful. An attempt to commit an offense must be specifically 

made unlawful. Blanchette v. State, 125 S.W. 26 (Tex. Crim. App. 1910). 

There is no provision in Texas statutes which provides that an attempt to 

violate article 15.71 of the Election Code is unlawful. Section 15.01 of the 

Penal Code, which defines and makes punishable criminal attempts, does not 

apply to offenses outside of the Penal Code by reason of section 1.03(b). The 

criminal attempt provision appears in Title 4 of the Penal Code and therefore 

does not extend to article 15.71 of the Election Code. 

p. 4907 
Honorable Neal Pfeiffer - Page 2 (H-1228) 

SUMMARY 

The Legislature has not established an offense of attempt to 

violate article 15.71 of the Election Code, concerning 

transporting voters to polls. 

Attorney General of Texas 

APPROVED: 

C. ROBERT HEATH, Chairman 

Opinion Committee 

jsn 

p. 4908
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1461 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1461

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen

                                 An Act

 
     To provide for the extension of the enforcement instruction on 
supervision requirements for outpatient therapeutic services in critical 
             access and small rural hospitals through 2015.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ENFORCEMENT INSTRUCTION ON SUPERVISION 
REQUIREMENTS FOR OUTPATIENT THERAPEUTIC SERVICES IN CRITICAL ACCESS AND 
SMALL RURAL HOSPITALS THROUGH 2015.
    Section 1 of Public Law 113-198 is amended--
        (1) in the section heading, by inserting ``and 2015'' after 
    ``2014''; and
        (2) by striking ``calendar year 2014'' and inserting ``calendar 
    years 2014 and 2015''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
-

•

ri

tk

;..f;

cc: Dir, NSA

WARIIING t

:

1 SENSITWE CITE: LICENCE SOURCES

?NO rZEMCDS 4400E5 cv-tilED

art"*. .4.

E414.1.11 ;VE • CADA :11•31

Got. f.ft t:ZIASSIFY 264-72

Witt

.macs

rig

-MI- NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

1

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR 1 December 1972

MEMORANDUM FOR LT GENERAL VERNON A. WAITERS, CHAIRMAN,

USIB STEERING GROUP ON MONITORING STRATEGIC

ARMS LIMITATIONS

SUBJECT: NRO Assistance in Assessing U. S. Intelligence

Collection Capabilities

This is in response to your memorandum of November 28

111111

requesting NRO assistance in evaluating U.S lities

for monitoring provisions of the ABM Treaty 2255/72).

I am pleased to offer our full support. I have designated Brigadier General David D. Bradburn, Director of the

NRO Staff, as the NRO member of the interagency working

group. Dave will be getting in touch with your people

directly.
REF ID:A68306 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

J)eQ" nr. T.,.td••• 

t .. to v.k: ,.. tor J'UP latt.. of !) .., 19S2. lftd. npffal.1)-

tw ~ tw..,... ~ dftft. o-.t a 111.M• toP sc.w. I ...... Jft. U.\ 

Lt. 1a bdllC •MUd atMDUwq .-4 1dll llilt um. 1111-.~ SA ....,.. ~ oar daR. ....,.. is eaad.-. ., ••• c1fHU"• .-l. -cmna1u tba 

N&l ••t. Ve .-...1 edd .. Vi-S.np. 

IA ao~• .:tth .,._._ l!Wqaed I am .-!inc JP. a ~ oopr ot ~ 8'att, lfillte I 91do· eq,1• 1V local d1.tr1W\Soa. 

I al.ff wish to Wlnk JfJ\l tor 1't\U' 19'\er ot ~ Hq~ Wl'i\.te AttezJOV 'IS.a\ id.Ul Galnt• as ,.,..- ~-- lioWld V1p. I• _. I bad • pCll -u. . .._.. a co-.pl.u 11! dqa &p ~ rni-.t .U. th• ~t.a £or 

u. ~et-. t •• si.i to OLi'k th..it. ;eu w ~ r--.t J'fXtZ"lffiJI 

1D OGSPl•te ql"l•1•\. on '4he ~ v.~ toa• r..i u.t. V.7 ar11 

qtd.k saUs1'•'°"7 .i u.a.t • ~ ·def!l•• a .-i c..i or ..._.-"it tftll 

-. .. ti..tti&:. m,A 1.a plJnd.irg to .m 5 to ' pe:niOU• ... ror • hU, 

..a.. aw tor V.... ...u. llhl hope "VJ&t. ~~ Cid -.- n. ... lifU1 

i. 

~ 

able to itdt.ld.~'-1t a. O..Rl ~ ~ 9f' wa-tl• 

th&t he 4n-;p !A .tor a "1!!11 \. ..,.. U.. 4uftag th& mmth ot JliJ.7 

• 

~ 

A~J 

~ 

at lN8\. !w told c.s.nia be a..ict lllllld I tllSak i. ell WDle• ~ dahlep.. I •ul.tl J.U;u to do U. w. ~ 

a ta. .,_. U.• &n:'I 80 _.... A4m1l"al iJclat;•• 

W..U ~ pn U a CIDP7 cf 7f1llZ' W\. le\ter lo bi.a .-! o..i 

-.k*1 • to p\ o.., • \he ~ er ni-. U.sbJ' ad -. • .r...-i.,. ...f,t , 

~ 

tlllSAdl ~ uot. '*9 lOQ& u I tb1nk liotta of thca hd9 appl"flJ)1'1a\a 

,_ iAaf..,... wt• ... to t.-n. .fe!' ~ W1ll i.~ ;rc:N. blov 

....,. 

1 'InrlMNft 

Copt tJt l>Ntt tor m...,,. .fbr 5CIC 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-16-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a- •
REF ID:A661BB 

CSNF~DENi~-IAL 

Rt. John e.. Jle?be-rson 

Yicv msident 

~ional ~Inc.- '4acb.J.M:s Corporation '90 ~ A'Y'llmUe 

:.V Tork 22, lev l'or~ 

Dela" Jolmt 

ewials OcJJ7 

9~v7f 

In. &CCOl"danee vith decaiona ..so at the lut ..tine; al the 

'lu 

Jl&tioml 

llldo See~ the fnit 

1 t, r' 

~""t 

Scie=tirtc 

V1th the 

M:Yiao:t',Y ~oetivo b.rd, 

panel 

tM. ~,a ~ 

in thiJ ~ cutli:aed in tbD J)irector • letter to JOU ct ~ reortaT¥ ]$~. 

'!bes !ncloten u.t ot ..,_1 ~ U.Ucawa ti. ~nt. 

.statue ot each ~ctina pa:e1 ~r. 

Galf enc .- oa tho nec~ce Pabt1 i..a not pt \tleeA 

calfttl<!tea in ~ to panel ..ax ship. tbJ.s 11 lllZ'tJn 3008, 

t.r Whoa cl.ee.rance aetion had }U'ttYioual,y 'bcGll Wt1.&ted. Be vill 

lie em:ttacted ta t'OOll .. favorable results ot t.be aet1on a.N reported. 

OA)¥ tboGe Who an C'Un'entzy l.Uted .u ~1-ted CQJl be 

11 II f :Ua~ UM<1 tt:tr ~ ~1uHJIJ. ~ 1lho _. t::r.YPto ~d. 

cam be -31~ lWOl'l 'With \he underato.x;dtne t.h:.t tbq' lie 1moctr1-te-d 

Wwv 'beeortln: ~a 1n Afi,t:r..t::'/ bw&Sr.ese. ~ u.1octrtaa.t1on cu 

••UJ' be aeCO"!;'li•i.a cm tbetr tint vuit to the Apncy. 

l::rt:/:A• 

M 

•tctaorlett 

the .t.atua 

chaoQts, 

et tha 

JC1U 

iad!vid1•l• 

vill be 11!1'0l':¥:d. 

bl the ~ir¥; 

ao U.t 

ot 

TfJf1.r 

~ 

pa.oel 

J.1et am M apt G\tt"J:Cut. 

x .. look'PtS tc:r::rvar1 to llee1ng 10'-l st t!w 2041 lffrll metinei 

et tbl lim'4. 

lfk1AI latter '*¥ \le 41acl ualtie4 whrn ti. J.MlQ!Stlnt 1" remvcd. 

•incen~, 

VILtlAM , • l'lllllW$ 

•• tc:utive ~.r EA SeMmt1tie A4vao.r;;• 1loard 

1 I:Mel1 A;c 

I4at at Cm-rm '-1 HllllboH d@Jf'4f2IDEZN"ftAb. ,.-.-u" 

-.,., ~t cc t In!orming Mr. Mc.Pherson( Chm Elec .Panel) 

Dr. I. I~ Ce.1%'08 aa to ~~J~~k~S,~~~9~~'53 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 11

             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              Six Months Ended June 30
                                              ------------------------
                                                 1998          1999
                                                 ----          ----
<S>                                          <C>            <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding:          4,923,180      5,816,426
                                             ==========     ==========

Net income (loss)                                92,549     $ (679,090)
                                             ==========     ==========

Basic net income (loss) per share            $      .02     $     (.12)
                                             ==========     ==========
Effect of dilutive stock
options                                         102,440              0
                                             ==========     ==========

Average shares outstanding:
Diluted                                       5,025,620      5,816,426
                                             ==========     ==========
Diluted net income (loss) per share          $      .02     $     (.12)
                                             ==========     ==========
</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEF      FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT**

**TO      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of, and for, the periods presented in the                Report. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                        |                                                                                                                                                                          |                        |
|---------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
| Date: November                14, 2006 | By:                                                                                                                                                                 |  /s/ William W. Priest |
|                                        | William                W. Priest                Chief                  Executive Officer                  (Principal                    Executive                    Officer) |

|                                        |                                                                                                                                                 |                 |
|---------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
| Date: November                14, 2006 | By:                                                                                                                                        |  /s/ Adam Borak |
|                                        | Adam                Borak                Chief                  Financial Officer(Principal                    Financial                    Officer) |

----
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 29, 2014.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, December 29, 2014

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0168. MARY TOWNSEND v. LOWE'S HOME CENTER et al..

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

14A08334
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - 44 CFR Part 67
          - [Docket ID FEMA-2008-0020; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1083]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is withdrawing its proposed rule concerning proposed flood elevation determinations for Humboldt County, California and Incorporated Areas.

# DATES:

As of March 5, 2015, the proposed rule published December 16, 2009, at 74 FR 66605, is withdrawn.

# ADDRESSES:

                        You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-1083, to Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-4064, or (email)                         *Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-4064, or (email)                         *Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On December 16, 2009, FEMA published a proposed rulemaking at 74 FR 66605, proposing flood elevation determinations along one or more flooding sources in Humboldt County, California. FEMA is withdrawing the proposed rulemaking and intends to publish a Notice of Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations in the                     **Federal Register**                     and a notice in the affected community's local newspaper following issuance of a revised preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map and Flood Insurance Study report.                

Authority:42 U.S.C. 4104; 44 CFR 67.4.

Dated: February 11, 2015.

Roy E. Wright,

Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2015-05096 Filed 3-4-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 9110-12-P
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to 

revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

-1-

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

MICHAEL F. MOORE,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

UNPUBLISHED

August 27, 2020

v No. 349505

Antrim Circuit Court

KATHLEEN R. GLYNN, LC No. 13-006629-DO

Defendant-Appellant.

Before: SHAPIRO, P.J., and SERVITTO and LETICA, JJ.

SHAPIRO, P.J. (concurring).

Like the majority, in whose opinion I join, I conclude that the arbitrator did not exceed her 

authority. 

The text of the relevant provision is unambiguously ambiguous. Its meaning is not 

apparent in the words themselves and each party has offered a reasonable interpretation. Moore 

asserts that he agreed to pay four percent of all the designated monies he is paid for a period of 

five years with no further payments to be made after the five-year period. In return, he submits, 

Glynn agreed to give up all interests in the joint businesses and Moore’s businesses. By contrast, 

Glynn interprets the provision to mean that for her entire lifetime she is to receive four percent of 

all amounts (e.g., future royalties) paid to Moore for the work performed during their marriage and 

for the five-year period thereafter.1 These understandings of the provision are so far afield from 

each other that if both parties are arguing in good faith it is difficult to understand why they 

believed there was an agreement at all. 

Nevertheless, the question is whether the agreement authorized the arbitrator to do what 

she did, and I agree with the majority that she acted within her authority. 

/s/ Douglas B. Shapiro 

 

1 Since the value of other property described in the settlement agreement is not in the record, we 

also cannot review the equity of the property division.
EXHIBIT 99.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer
of Biomet, Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies that to his knowledge
on the date hereof:

(a)   The Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter Ended August 31, 2002
      filed on the date	hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)   Information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

                                                      /s/  Dane A. Miller
                                                      -------------------
                                                      Dane A. Miller, Ph.D.
                                                      October 14, 2002

                                                      /s/  Gregory D. Hartman
                                                      -----------------------
                                                      Gregory D. Hartman
                                                      October 14, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1826 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1826

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
           the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
99 West 2nd Street in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, as the Lieutenant Colonel 
                 James ``Maggie'' Megellas Post Office.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LIEUTENANT COLONEL JAMES ``MAGGIE'' MEGELLAS POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 99 West 2nd Street in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Lieutenant Colonel James `Maggie' Megellas Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lieutenant 
Colonel James `Maggie' Megellas Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
ex10_2.htm


    Exhibit
      10.2

     

     

    Operating
      Agreement of La Cañada Mining and Exploration LLC

    (to
      be provided by amendment)