alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

VICENTE LOPEZ-RIOS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Nos. 09-10308 & 09-10309

D.C. Nos. 3:08-cr-00846-SI

 3:03-cr-00206-SI

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 5, 2011** 

Before: B. FLETCHER, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges. 

In these consolidated appeals, Vicente Lopez-Rios appeals from his guiltyplea conviction and 36-month sentence for illegal reentry following deportation, in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and from the revocation of his supervised release and

the 6-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California,

FILED

APR 11 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-10308 & 09-10309

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Lopez-Rios’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no

grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No

pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
#### The State ex rel. Clark, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Clark v. Indus. Comm.*(1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 578.]

(No. 99-87

Submitted July 28, 1999

Decided September 22, 1999.)

*Koltak & Gibson L.L.P., Ronald J. Koltak*and *Peter J. Gibson,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Dennis H. Behm,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed. The cause is returned to the Industrial Commission for relief consistent with *State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm*(1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., dissent.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
l 

cc: NJ 

REF ID:A415Blill0. ~ 

lftit Ci.tl.M S, 'W#.Ytl' . 

Otttce ot the Al•ta~t Se~ tJt Detebff (J/'D) ,,,. Pente&<m 

~-. veavera 

· '1he ntxt ..una ot 't1Mt lfat1otaai S.wrlW Aaano1 ScictUtc - Mvltol7 Bo6l'O. ww. be be1<1•~1@, oa 15-16 Octobtr 1953 at 

the Mval s.cu:rtt,y S1i&tlon. . 

At W.. tS.1 ~ "J(ri of tho SpecSal StudJ GltniJ V1U . be tOl'allJ aublid:tte4 tor ~ '1 tht brd.. Jtl Yin ot · ~ 9biburab.Sp in. tb.o arou;p, t.D4 ot 1t:1f# ft17 ~. contr1• 

ntiau to 1tt J1'0Cb,lot, 7CU .,. .~ SDvS.tea. w ·~ 

w.. meet1D6 ot the Joata. 

s~, 

d/s 

S/ASS'l 

Hem tor Record: Invitation to attend next NSASAB mts which v1ll ·present the 

repOl't of the Special Study Croup tor approval of the l3Qa.rd. Mr. Weaver 

contributed mterial.1¥ to the report. · . · · 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 12-01~2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
: ., 

1,: I • - ~ t 

(

4. 

; •. ' • -~ : .. - .I 

___ . , ·"'-·-·~ I

;.: '· 

' 

OFFICES OF THE CYPHER POLICY BOA~, 

c/o ROOM 9, 

10 CHFSTERFIELD STREET, 

LONDON, W .I. 

Grosvenor 3095-6 

Reference: L/26B/6774. 

The Director, 

Armed Forces Security Agency, 

Washington. 

FOREIGN OFFICE, SWI 

22nd. August, 1951. 

U.K. Czpher Policy Board. 

At the recent BRUS/i COMSEC Conference I was asked to forward 

details of the Organiz'ation, Terms of Reference and 

Representation of our Cypher Policy Board. 

I enclose herewith two copies of a diagram showing the 

Chain of Command of tne Cypher Policy Board and its supporting 

Committees and Panels ,aμd their association with other ~elated 

Conmrl..ttees, together With a paper giving the other relevant 

details. 

The Secretariat of the Cypher Policy Board is provided by 

G.C.H.Q. from its Cypher Security Department. EO 3 . 3 (h) (2 ) 

Secretary, 

Cypher Policy Board 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

c 0 p y 

eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-07-2014 pursuant to E.O. 

3526 
;; 

~ • 

=~ ., 

. . 

• 

·f 

.i 

,• 

. 

' I 

.~; 

• 

~tf !· • •. ;,,,:t:.:. 

• I 

....... 

....... ,· 

--· 

.... i . 

. . . . -~f -·-· 

~ D AUU 1:151 i 

~ ... & ··""" ... """r"" . 

REF 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) L CABIN~T PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

- ---- . 

.I :J ,1$.nl{y.,1;:f <!rl' 1 .;y ,A Jt ~~r---·----,------L----.----.-_-_-:_ ________ ~ 

CHIEFS 

OF STAFF 

COMMITTEE 

NTERDEPARTME NTAL INTERDEPA~TME NTAL 

I 

JOINT 

INTELLIGENCE 

COMMITTEE 

SECURITY 

SUB-COMMITTEE 

COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEE ON 

CENSORSHIP SECURITY 

LIAISON OFFICERS 

CONFERENCE 

1 r------------------

I 

I COMBINED I 

I 

:CHIEFS OF STAFF! I I 

I • I ._ ____ ----,---------J I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

: 

I 

I r-···-····-L------····1 

I l 

: C. C. B. I 

I 

U.K. U.S . 

. C,E.c.(wJ J.C.E.C. 

.· .· allliiii1.~-~--------------J 

•
EXHIBIT 11
            Statement re:  Computation of Earnings per Share
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                           For the Three Months Ended September 30, 
                                1997                    1996
                       ----------------------- -----------------------
                                      Fully                   Fully
                         Primary     Diluted     Primary     Diluted
                       ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
<S>                    <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Weighted Average 
 Shares Outstanding:

 Common Stock           12,195,891  12,195,891  12,195,891  12,195,891
 Shares Available 
   Under Options            42,351      69,621     254,947     374,247
                       ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

Weighted Average Common
 and Common Equivalent 
 Shares Outstanding     12,238,242  12,265,512  12,450,838  12,570,138
                       =========== =========== =========== ===========

Net Income             $   428,486 $   428,486 $    40,745 $    40,745
                       =========== =========== =========== ===========

Earnings per Share     $      0.04 $      0.03 $      0.00 $      0.00
                       =========== =========== =========== ===========


</TABLE>
NUMBER 13-16-00338-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

TIMOTHY RAY GRANT, Appellant,

v.

ANDREA ELEASE MYERS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 329th District Court

of Wharton County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Timothy Ray Grant, appealed a judgment entered by the 329th District 

Court of Wharton County, Texas. On June 27, 2016, the Clerk of this Court notified 

appellant that the notice of appeal failed to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 9.5(e) and 25.1(d)(4). See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(e), 25.1(d)(4). The Clerk 

directed appellant to file an amended notice of appeal with the district clerk's office within 
2

30 days from the date of that notice. On August 8, 2016, the Clerk notified appellant that 

the defect had not been corrected and warned appellant that the appeal would be 

dismissed if the defect was not cured within ten days. Appellant has not responded to 

the notice from the Clerk or corrected the defect.

On July 28, 2016, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant, in accordance with 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the 

$205.00 filing fee was paid. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Appellant has not responded 

to the notice from the Clerk or paid the $205.00 filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 12.1(b).

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s failure to 

correct the defect or pay the filing fee, is of the opinion that the appeal should be 

dismissed. See id. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed this

2nd day of September, 2016.
All data has been removed from this file as a result of CBI sanitization. All data used to determine the

biological treatment overhead engineering cost factor is considered CBI or CBI deducible.
2 

REF ID:A67000 

DUX' StcwRl'tt 

l tried to get :mi en tba telaph:o:10 tod.87 to ~ate 

the aubotnnce ot G.r..oi'al Canina' e lotter \() JOU ant to Uk ';{au. 

to telephone 3obertRi)'l w1. thout. dol.ey-1 chaJ."~ t"io call to the 

OO'rerrrY.mt, But I tou.'111 that rou vero etra.ite to r:rut" Ion 1 a 

veddine1 lllO deeidod not to disturb ~"OU at Mount V•rnon. 

Plf.llBo cllll !Wbart:;•.n11 try 'TOU1! bo:tt to :et hi.Ill to 11.CCtlPt 

tbe c.hai.rEJans'1i" ot tho Ca=iitt.ee and call m back on the telephone 

to let l!1li ~ tibat hf.J a~""G. t hopo he .CCO?ts ar.d tells 101.l 

when ha can pt ~· "! think m should plan to •W at least 

a couple or ver».ko iait!.ally an.1 eona back later tor &10thar 

couplo ot wee..tm. 

Thie .t-.idy pro3ect ie t.urn1~ out w b:! of tar greater 

1llpart 'tt.a11 '11\1' or ua tti~t at tint. 're shflll ell do our 

beat to make it worth vl'dle, 

lf!LL!!M F. :P''tl rt!D'."ATJ 

Spec-'-&l Aslrts~t. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-20-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
REF ID:A2263420 

'· ..
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B) AND

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER
63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

In connection with the Annual Report of Creative Technology Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Sim Wong Hoo, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Sim Wong HooSim Wong HooChief Executive OfficerDate: December 31, 2008
.. .. .. ~-vt... . .. '-- 'i -=--~ 

IEID RDUTllG SLIP .t<i..-.., ·~~~'=:,.a.a. 

I llAllE,~ f/~ ,........,..-.... ~ •. ' llft1ALI QllCll.ATI 

~ 

I :· - t ' : I .. ' • ;.. ~ • i:""I ' 

AllD LOCA.11111 \ r .. ; '-~ DA'll CllCIRmA'llDll 

a I'll.I 

w 

- .... '111111 

" I llECIDlllY 

ACID 

- mRAID 

lln1lllll 

.. . ... _,_ 

lllllAllllS 

ICl.o roved for Release bv NSA on 02-06-2014 oursuantto E.O. 1352CJ 

~·· FROll llAlll m. a ~ .Jd ... ,:ir ... 

-~!.=·· .......... 

DD ,_ 95 ~DA..1.ao:r...-.1.a.pr-.111111.A.l'BQ I FEI II nm .. JO Im"· .......... m lllli& 

__ _._ 
REF ID:A72178 

Colonel Gilbert C. JMobua 

Depity Commn"ant aa4 

Director ot Inetruction 

coawxt Mlulage:mmt School 

fort Belvoi.r, Virginia 

Dear Gill 

31 .J4mlary l955 

You were ~ to :remtaber 1our promiao to send ma the 

aterial about your lcbool. Thia letter 1• merelf to aok:r.IOv .. 

ledp rece1l1t ot the aterial and. to say that I torvardad it 

iWdiately to O.Dll'al Canine, who Mnt it to the Chief' ot 

our '1'rttJJUng Division tor atudy, OQ'l9nt, and reca.nmdetton. 

I think I told. you w have tvo ot cur people nov in atteQ4atioe 

at the Ra.rvard »uaiDHa SChool, t.kiag a 1'"uJ.l lMJ''• courH 

in buai?JeH ma.nagemnt • 

As aoon aa I bear trom our TraiDiDI D1via1on Im¥ w.nt 

to conmunicate further vith you 4'l>out 10'U' achool and whether 

or not we vill be able to take adw.ntep of the apeci&l 

opportunitin it attord.a.
. 1". ftew.rt s. Ce.Una 

C&1') &dding 

l&IPi.fltl, ... Jfan:pahire 

D&ia:' Dr. Calm#a 

11nce Hr'. hiedmn u tNt of town tor tlrQ OJ" tllree 

VMltlJ, J f'elt :t ~ a.uwi- ¥CJUr letter ~ lO Jul¥ J.9}4. 

81nce ;you •re here ldt, the MA lee;i!Jt:q ror 

Couulte.nta bM been eatabllihed. an4 cha.rgCt4. vi.th the 

detaJ.le4 ~tiv. "'Ponei'billtiea a.MOCiated Yith 

..U oux- cQA.tNlt.ant#. Xu Vin ot thie, 1f8 laa.ve ~ 

O'nn" ..U our pe:rt1nellt neol"de to thia unit. l bave 

MD\ 7ou.r ~to tbea Y1th t.be nqμ.cst that the;y look 

1-to '\be attor ~tel.1.00.adv.UO10\l aceordiJtgl)-. 

"1laDk you tor ca13'ng thie to O\U' •ttiautioo. 

lineereq, 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-17-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
(unclassifie~i fiitQ): A68 696 

TRANSMITTAL and RECEIPT 

.... 

• 

io::._ 

EMr. William T • Friedman ~O 2nd Street S.E. 

;:.Washington~ D.C. 

..... -

lllATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

Washington 25, D.C • 

DATE 

9 Dec 58 

1. -11: IS RE~UESTED THAT RECEIPT FOR THIS MATERIAL BE ACKNOWLEDGED BY EXECUT4NG AND RE 

\. 

.. 

e1;u .. ow RECEIPT. 

2.~-T,'I,ER MAY BE DOWNGRADED TO ______________ WHEN ENCLOSURES ARE REMOVED. 

INv.!;.Q~IJ.REliJ : - . __ , I 

·~A56 ... 46' (1 Box of Slides) # 3 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-09-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
EXHIBIT 8

LIST OF SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

The following is a listing of the significant (direct/indirect) subsidiaries
of Creative:



|                                          |  |                         |  |           |  
|----------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | --------- | -
|Name/Region of Principal Operations       |  | Country ofIncorporation |  | Ownership |  
|United States of America:                 |  |                         |  |           |  
|Creative Labs, Inc.                       |  | U.S.A.                  |  | 100       | %
|Europe:                                   |  |                         |  |           |  
|Creative Labs Ireland                     |  | Ireland                 |  | 100       | %
|Asia:                                     |  |                         |  |           |  
|Creative Technology Centre Pte Ltd        |  | Singapore               |  | 100       | %
|Creative Technology (Qingdao) Co. Ltd     |  | China                   |  | 100       | %
|Others:                                   |  |                         |  |           |  
|CTI Limited                               |  | Bermuda                 |  | 100       | %
|CTI II Limited                            |  | Bermuda                 |  | 100       | %
|3Dlabs Inc., Ltd and subsidiary companies |  | Bermuda                 |  | 100       | %
#### Cook and another, Appellants, vs. The City of Menasha, Respondent.

*January 15*

February *2, 1897.*

*Appeal from order.*

An order of the circuit court, denying a motion to vacate an order for the bringing in of additional parties, is not appealable under ch. 212, Laws of 1895.

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Winnebago county: Geo. W. Bubhell, Circuit Judge.

*Appeal dismissed.*

The case is stated in the opinion.

For the appellants there were briefs by *Webster '<& Glasson,*and oral argument by *W. H. Webster.*

To the point that the ■order was appealable as a final order affecting a substantial right in a special proceeding, they cited *Hekla F. Ins. Go. v. Morrison,*56 Wis. 133; *Ga/rney v. Qlhssner,*62 id. 493; *Morse v. Stockman,*65 id. 36.

' *Gdbe Bouok,*for the respondent.

Maeshall, J.

On the 18th day of December, 1895, the defendant, by its attorney, on *thy*hearing of a motion duly made for that purpose, obtained an order bringing in other *216parties as defendants. On the 16th day of January, 1896, a motion on. the part of plaintiffs was duly brought on for á hearing before the court, for an order vacating the order of December, 18, 1895. Such motion to vacate was denied, and an order accordingly entered from which the plaintiffs appealed. This case is ruled by *Smith v. Scott,*93 Wis. 453, where this court held that such orders are not appeal-able, under ch. 212, Laws of 1895. Therefore this appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction to entertain it.

*By the*Court.— The appeal is dismissed.
i 

' 

REF ID:A6571ff 

Dl'" 

~ 

Jobn v. TUkey 

of Mathemttca 

frinceton um.vent w 

hinceton, JfeV Jaaey 

ne.:r nr. '1\ake¥ • 

iztde ta to ~ fteeipt ot J'OUX" ~ of 

the invitation to Yiait the Wo.tioaal Seeur1ty ~ far 

"1le 20-21 ~ Joint hnel ~il1gs. 

u _ ¥Qt1 v1U :plan to arrive at 3S01 lebra8ka A1'enUB, 

Muhf 

at tm 

ns;ton, 

gatehouse 

at 8t45 

to 

a.m. 

met 10\1• 

oci. 20 *1' 1 va v1ll _.,. ~ 

l ui SnclQelllg C(:l)iea ot ~ ~vol o:rdrn"i; and & 

~tioc nquii1.t rcrr th1a trip in ~ vith 

Jtifir Wijbes" Aleo U.Cl.--4 tor your ~ntenee t. u ~itm lheet vi.th the HqU.1re4 torm ao tl:m.t J*OU ~ 

fte01ve co:tp0t1Sation ~ 10Ul" llt!t"Vicee as ~t.17 aa 

Potaible \llO!l theix' ~lriton .. 

6 Xnc1t 

a/• 

·~' 

M/R: Acknowledging Dr .. Tukey'n acceptance 

to the joint Panel. Meetings 20-21 May. 

Also inclosing all necessary forms, travel 

ard.ere, T/R 'tar eonpletion or trip .. 

tt. I.T. McDonald./6o493/4 May 54/can 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

-------------=---=;;;;;;;;;;;;;--

-.
# CE2004084EN.01067301.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/673 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/673

---

(2004/C 84 E/0759)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0796/04

by Michel Hansenne (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(11 March 2004)

Subject:   Lift safety

Subject:

The European Committee for Standardisation has produced a safety norm for existing lifts, the SNEL. This standard helps countries identify the risks of existing lifts and legislate to improve their safety. Recommendation 95/216/EC (1) accompanying Directive 95/16/EC (2) obviously does not mention this new norm. In view of the number of fatal accidents that have occurred in recent years and as some countries have enacted legislation in this sphere or are in the process of doing so, it would appear to be essential to update the recommendation. This would help policy-makers determine the most appropriate measures to take to minimise the risks linked to existing lifts in compliance with Norm EN 81-80, which was ratified on 3 November 2003.

1

2

Can the Commission give an undertaking that the recommendation will be updated?

Answer given by Mr Liikanen on behalf of the Commission

(19 April 2004)

(19 April 2004)

Commission Recommendation 95/216/EC of 8 June 1995 (3) concerns existing lifts, i.e. lifts installed before the entry into force of the lifts Directive 95/16/EC (4). This recommendation calls on Member States to take all necessary action on their territory to ensure a satisfactory level of maintenance for existing lifts and to improve the safety of those lifts.

3

4

The European Committee for Standardisation has recently adopted a new standard, EN 81-80, which concerns improving the safety of existing lifts. Even though this standard does not have the same status as the harmonised standards adopted under Directive 95/16/EC, it provides advice and information which will certainly be of great value for all parties concerned in the implementation of Recommendation 95/216/EC. The Commission will closely examine the possibility of updating its recommendation to include a reference to the new standard. The Commission will inform the Honourable Member of the decision taken following this examination.

---

(1)  OJ L 134, 20.6.1995, p. 37.

1

(2)  OJ L 213, 7.9.1995, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 134, 20.6.1995.

3

(4)  European Parliament and Council Directive 95/16/CEC of 29 June 1995 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to lifts, OJ L 213, 7.9.1995.

4

---
.μ 

~ ~BORIS.HAGELIN REF ID:A2 26~~3zug, March 19,66. 

] j~ !/)"'£ •r-i .μ 

0 rcs,...; ·rl Dear Elizebeth, +Ji::14-il--<0 

~ ~ ~ ·~1 Many thanks for your kind letter of the 11th. 

0 •rl •rl 

u !--< E-t "'d 

.-i ~ • @ U) Yes, we are now soon out of our house: on the 

~ 1-1 § al] 25th we will leave it for good and go to Minus-

~...C: ...C: .._l Q) io. As our apartment will not be ready for us 

~ 6 +-' U) ·~before end o.f April we will probably go on to 

• ..o ~ "'d 4-1 Menton and spend some time there . 

..rj ;:=: © g ~Our address will in the meantime be c/ o Crypto 

i-.. ·r-1 ..o oo o AG Z ug. 

~ ;3:,...; i::: i-.. In May we will be back in Zug for a visit, as 

~ ~ ~ ·r-1 g there will be a house-warming party for all who 

+-' .. ;3: g ~are employed at the Crypto AG. We have already 

U) ~ s ~©begun to move the shop from the old place ·to 

~ :-;=: ~ "'d ~the~ but a lot remains to be done in our 

U) @ ~ .~ Q) new works, before it will be finished. It will 

:84-1~4-I :S:be quite imposing, if compared with our present 

U) .-i U) f ac;t;ory . 

..rj;Jr-;:::-;=:'BBut· it will also mean that we shall need still 

~ ,..c: ~ ;s: ~more business than we have at present, as the 

ti).:=: 00 .~ ~overhead will become considerably higher than 

"'d :S: i::: ...c: it is now. The year has however begun well, ~ •rl .μ Q) d h h . . 1 . c0 .. i-.. .μan we ope tat it wi 1 continue so . 

.. ~!;~~As to health, Annie is in good shape, and I 

~ §~ :J .~myself cannot complain. 

b.O ~ o © 0 And we were very happy to learn that Bill feels 

~ +-' i:i.. <U better, we only hope that you yourself have no ·rl (!) U) 0 4-1 1 h 1 . 1 1 d +-' ,..c: <U ,..c: 4-1 onger t ose comp a1nts tnat p ague you some 

·~ +-' ~ 0 cd time after your return to the US from your 

·rl ~ o "'d ...c: sojourn in Europe in '63. 

::> • i--. Q) .;::: We noted that you were thinking of getting a 

vq:: ;:::! ;s: ;s: h . ·r-i ·rl o smaller ouse or an apartment, but tha Bill -~---..·~ 

0 ~ U) ~] doesnt savor the thought of an apartment. Well, 

p:\ c0 c0 z cd we ourselves are moving to an apartment, but it 

CL. .q. is a penthouse, and I would not advise you to 

~ ~ ~ tal}e an apartment halfway up, so as to have 

~~ ne~hbors over,under and on both sides of your 

~ own home! ..,._/
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B) AND

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER
63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

In connection with the Annual Report of Creative Technology Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Ng Keh Long, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Ng Keh LongNg Keh LongChief Financial OfficerDate: December 31, 2008