alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004078EN.01055901.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/559 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/559

---

(2004/C 78 E/0594)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3474/03

by Herbert Bösch (PSE) to the Commission

(24 November 2003)

Subject:   Contracts with management consultants in Commission offices

Subject:

Given that no final answer has yet been provided to Written Question E-0844/03 (1) of 18 March 2003 on contracts with management consultants, although eight months have now passed since it was submitted, can the Commission initially provide the following information:

1

| — | How many contracts have the cabinets of individual Commissioners concluded with management consultants since 2000, and what is their total value? |
| --- | --- |

—

How many contracts have the cabinets of individual Commissioners concluded with management consultants since 2000, and what is their total value?

| — | What tasks were assigned to the management consultants? |
| --- | --- |

—

What tasks were assigned to the management consultants?

| — | Why were Commission officials not called on to carry out these tasks? |
| --- | --- |

—

Why were Commission officials not called on to carry out these tasks?

| — | Can the Commission state whether these tasks cost less to carry out externally than if they are carried out internally, and provide figures to back this up? |
| --- | --- |

—

Can the Commission state whether these tasks cost less to carry out externally than if they are carried out internally, and provide figures to back this up?

| — | Has the Commission ever become aware of consultancy work being carried out to an unsatisfactory standard? What criteria does the Commission apply when assessing consultancy services? |
| --- | --- |

—

Has the Commission ever become aware of consultancy work being carried out to an unsatisfactory standard? What criteria does the Commission apply when assessing consultancy services?

| — | Has a consultancy contract ever proved damaging to the Commission, and, if so, to what extent? |
| --- | --- |

—

Has a consultancy contract ever proved damaging to the Commission, and, if so, to what extent?

Answer given by Mr Kinnock on behalf of the Commission

(5 February 2004)

(5 February 2004)

The allocations to the Cabinets cover the organisation of meetings (heading A-7030) and appropriations for the employment of auxiliary agents, but do not cover consultants.

The principal heading, A-7002, and also headings A-7050 and A-7060 depending on the field of activity — some of which may cover the use of consultants — fall within the responsibility of the various Commission DGs and Services.

No Cabinets of Commissioners have concluded any contracts with consultants since 2000.

Members of the Commission may also use the services of special advisers, either without remuneration or using heading A-1113 for which EUR 300 000 has been allocated for 2004.

---

(1)  OJ C 192 E, 14.8.2003, p. 220.

1

---
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-40596

Summary Calendar

_____________________

PATRICK MAC JACKSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MARSHALL HERKLOTZ, Southern

Regional Director, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-92-CV-483

_________________________________________________________________

January 15, 1998

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Patrick Mac Jackson, Texas inmate #478883, appeals the

dismissal as frivolous of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint.

Jackson’s motion for an evidentiary hearing before this court is 

DENIED.

We have carefully reviewed the record and the appellate

arguments. For essentially the same reasons upon which the

district court relied by adopting the magistrate judge’s report,
-2-

see Jackson v. Herklotz, No. G-92-483 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 1996), we

conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in

dismissing Jackson’s claims.

A F F I R M E D.
REF ID:A38880 

e e 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

Mr:. William F. Friedman 

310 2nd Street, s. E. 

Washington, D. c. 

Dear Mr. Friedman: 

WASHINGTON 250 D C 

Serial: EXSAB 66-56 

23 October 1956 

The Scientif'ic Advisor,y :Boa.rd, at its meeting J.7 February 1956, 

accepted the proposa1 that its Ma.theme.tics Panel. undertake a review 

of' the SCAMP program and the program ot mathematical research within 

the National. Security Agency. rt was agreed tl:lat this review would 

be undertaken when Dr. Wilks returned to the United states in the 

fall. 

Dr. Wilks, Chairmen of the Ma.thematics Panel., is pl.enD1ng a 

two-day meeting on 13and14 December 1956 at the Nationa.l Security 

Agency to in1 tiate the program of review. It is pl.anned to spend 

the f'irst day in briefings to the members of the Mathematics Panel 

and such Board members as are interested in brief'& of the Agency 

programs under review, with a more detailed technical. follow-up for 

the second day. Further direction of the review and the detail in 

which this will be conducted Will be determined as a result of this 

two-de;y session. 

We would appreciate an indication ea to whether you plan to 

attend either or both of the sessions. 

FOR THE CHAIBMAN, MATBEMATICS PANEL· 

Executive 

~~ Secretary 

NBA Scientif'ic Advisory Board 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-11-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
# CE2004084EN.01066701.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/667 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/667

---

(2004/C 84 E/0752)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0736/04

by José García-Margallo y Marfil (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(11 March 2004)

Subject:   Support for regions which will not be included in Structural Fund Objective 1 on account of the so-called ‘statistical effect’

Subject:

What transitional financial arrangements will apply to the regions which cease to qualify for Structural Fund Objective 1 status on account of the so-called ‘statistical effect’ which is due to the arrival of regions from the new Member States whose average income levels are well below the current Community average?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(13 April 2004)

(13 April 2004)

The Commission adopted proposals for the future of cohesion policy for the period 2007-2013 in the Third Report on economic and social cohesion which was adopted on 18 February 2004 and transmitted to Parliament and to the Council. Among the proposals, the Commission considers that temporary support should apply to regions where per capita the gross domestic product (GDP) would have been below 75 % of the Community average in a Union of Fifteen but above 75 % in a Union of Twenty-five (the so-called statistical effect of enlargement). These are regions where objective circumstances have not changed, although their GDP per head will be relatively higher in the enlarged Union. In the interest of equity, and to allow the regions concerned to complete the process of convergence, the Commission proposes that support would be higher than decided in Berlin in 1999 for the so-called ‘phasing out’ regions of the current generation (1).

1

---

(1)  COM(2004) 107: A new partnership for cohesion.

1

---
# CE2004088EN.01019902.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/199 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/199

---

(2004/C 88 E/0206)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0665/04

by Gerhard Schmid (PSE) to the Commission

(9 March 2004)

Subject:   Safety standards for image editing of scanned banknotes

Subject:

The latest versions of Adobe Photoshop CS and Paint Shop Pro do not allow images of banknotes to be imported or edited. The mechanism involved, which has been developed by the Central Bank Counterfeit Deterrence Group (CBCDG), a consortium of central banks from around the world, is a major step forward in preventing the counterfeiting of banknotes.

| 1. | Is the Commission aware of this mechanism? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the Commission aware of this mechanism?

| 2. | Is the Commission planning to introduce this mechanism as a mandatory safety standard? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is the Commission planning to introduce this mechanism as a mandatory safety standard?

Answer given by Mrs Schreyer on behalf of the Commission

(28 April 2004)

(28 April 2004)

The Commission is aware of the efforts of the Central Bank Counterfeit Deterrence Group (CBCDG) to develop counterfeit deterrence technology aimed at preventing the digital reproduction of banknote images.

The Commission considers it important that the counterfeit deterrence technology be applied.

The Commission has been in contact with the European Central Bank (ECB) on the issue of initiating legislation making mandatory the use of the counterfeit deterrence technology in products capable of handling digital images.

In agreement with the Commission, the ECB is currently preparing a preliminary assessment directly with the industry.

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of ePresence, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 29, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ WILLIAM P. FERRY                 
|                     |  |     |  | William P. Ferry                     
|                     |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  |    
|Date: March 29, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ RICHARD M. SPAULDING             
|                     |  |     |  | Richard M. Spaulding                 
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer              



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN
STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO EPRESENCE, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY EPRESENCE, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
REF ID:A67193 

Beu' Adild.rel Jocoph a. !lod:wl, USN, a.t. 

Vice Pnzd.dant 

veetom Union ~ph CClll!lpll!V' 

140!> a st.raat, n;-.1. 

Waald:Qaton,, D,. c. 

llul" Joea 

Thank ~ 'fflrT mch tor tho broclm'a on the 

specdt.lcatiorua for Inetallatio'l and Opontion ot 

telAkr';pton 2<.. I ..-Ve had a COPJ" -.do anr:l • 

•a:idini t t to 111&. ffegeli!I.. ! think this vlll do 

am:lrab1Jr1 b.lt I doubt vi.it.~ W•tel'n Union vil1 

zteee1n atl1' order t.ron h1la. 

ThE11d.ns JW ap1n, I m, 

ll!noorel.7, 

cch AG 

C/S 

S/ASST 

v.tLLIA'f F • PRIIDMAN 

SPQCS al b~taut; 

M/Rt ~. ser. 1640, dtd 9 Air 53 requosting above mentioned 

brochure. Brochure1 but no correapondencff, was received tror.i 

Adm. Re&mn. 

w. F. Friodman/S/Asst/6049.3/28 Apr SJ. - eby-

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-20-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
98-2481.

#### Leisure v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Stark App. Nos. 1997CA00420 and 1997CA00445. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal and cross-appeal from the Court of Appeals for Stark County. Upon consideration of appellants/crossappellees’ motion to continue oral argument currently scheduled for September 22,1999,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to continue oral argument be, and hereby is, denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.56


                  TERMINATION OF STOCKHOLDERS' VOTING AGREEMENT

      The undersigned, Viacom Inc., a Delaware corporation (successor to CBS
corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation) (the "Purchaser"), ePresence, Inc., a
Massachusetts corporation, (formerly Banyan Systems Incorporated, a
Massachusetts corporation) ("ePresence), and Switchboard Incorporated, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby agree that the Stockholders' Voting
Agreement dated as of June 30, 1999 by and among the undersigned is hereby
terminated in its entirety and shall have no further force or effect, effective
as of January 1, 2001.

      ePresence agrees that if ePresence transfers shares of capital stock of
the Company held by it such that, after giving effect to such transfer,
ePresence's indemnification obligations under Section 8 of the Common Stock and
Warrant Purchase Agreement by and among the undersigned dated as of June 1, 1999
(the "Purchase Agreement") would have terminated as a result of such transfer
pursuant to Section 8.4(b)(y) of the Purchase Agreement, ePresence's
indemnification obligations pursuant to Section 8 shall nonetheless continue in
full force and effect in accordance with the terms of Section 8 and subject to
Section 8.4(b)(x), notwithstanding Section 8.4(b)(y).


      Executed as of January 1, 2001.


                                     Viacom Inc.

                                     By: /s/ Fredrik G. Reynolds
                                         -------------------------------
                                         Name: Fredrik G. Reynolds
                                         Title: Executive Vice President
                                         & Chief Financial Officer


                                     ePresence, Inc.


                                     By: /s/ Richard M. Spaulding
                                         -------------------------------
                                         Name: Richard M. Spaulding
                                         Title: Senior Vice President &
                                         Chief Financial Officer

                                     Switchboard Incorporated

                                     By: /s/ Douglas Greenlaw
                                         -------------------------------
                                         Name: Douglas Greenlaw
                                         Title: Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                      ----------------------------------


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-56306, 33-56440, 33-56442, 33-79672 and 
33-98006) of our report dated December 12, 1997, except as to the last paragraph
of Note C, which is as of January 19, 1998, appearing on page F-4 of this Annual
report on Form 10-K.


/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

Dallas, Texas
January 29, 1998
15 J\l~ 1953 

!EM>RANOOM Fm THE SFECIAL ASSISTANT 

1. In connection ld. th the forthcoming UK/US COM:>EC Conference to be held 

in London in October 19531 R/ D has nomf.nated several individuals, including 

Messrs. H. c. Barlow, J. R. Chiles, M. M. Mathews, and B. G. Erickson to participate in the Conference itsel.t or in the informal discussions which are to 

precede it. It is assumed that the S/ASST will head the U. s. delegation. 

2. As previ011Sly discussed, it is thought.that serious consideration 

should be given to the proposal that the s/ASST, along with several of the 

above-na.nsd representatives of R/D, visit, preferably prior to the LOndon 

meetings, some of th3 commercial organizations in Europe wltl.ch a.re engaged 

in the development and production of cryptographic equipment, in order to 

gain soma first-mnd lmowledge of the scope of their activities and, if 

possible, infoma.tion on the specific eq11ipments which th3y have under 

developnent or in production, their engineering and ma.mfactur:tng techniques, 

etc. It is felt that any information thJ.s gained will be of considerable 

valne to various activities within this Agency 1 and, :further, that the people 

best qualified to glean such information are those engaged in the developnent 

of similar equipment here• 

3. Among the organizations which should be visited, if' appropriate 

arrangements can be ma.de, arc: 

Aktiebolaget cryptoteknik 

Nordenf],ychtsvagen 62 

Stockholm, SWeden 

(and also Hagelin•s establishment 

at Zug, Switzerland} 

Dr. Edgar Gretener, A.G. 

Elektromechanik und Lichttechnik 

Zurich, SWi tzerland 

Atheneum-Stiftung 

Vaduz, Liechtenstein 

Olivetti 

Ivrea (Aosta.) Italy 

ottico Meccanica Italiana 

Valeo di s. Paolo 

Rome, Italy 

4. Your coDJDents on the best approach to the problem of arranging for 

these visits and any further suggestions you may have 'Will be appreciated. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-15-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
. Ill-· , • ,,.. Co~ 

-~~ 

lu4~U. 

1700 *1G StNin 

REF ID:A415B.,W ·~ 

..... Moal•t °'1~ 

~~-~· · ·tt.s.• .....,, • ~tai sblt' ll"Wf1 ..,... tM ....,. .. or -. 

ldt..i eeo•l.v .-., a.t..utto Mr.s.7 ....._, u·1utl4 • • 

•Jm ot ..... •• ~-· w·w.,,...,., • w t1at •• •••• •• • • • • 

.• , .. .-*'* ...... .....,. .. ~~-- ... ,...a. - - t.a , .. tlal ,.., . 

. . .l WOUl4 19* '° ... ~ ........ - ...... IQ' ..,._,,...,. 

tt• 

~ 

to • PJ&n4 ~l'IOIMtl«t ••Wt .t tbe s.tleeal ~lt:Y . ' 

t. 'the ft'!'Y1"9 tJt 1'l-,. at.dart c • ...,...., GM or JOIW' •••11••1 04 to- Qt. ~ ~Jly te ~ ~. d'fCll'M _. 

~· ooewsbtltt• '°ta _....or '\bU ~ll 

8!.bceMS,i 

CCI M . c/s . s/li1t:n 

M/B: Dt-. B. P, Robert•cm reciut•~4 tlds lettv be mtta Ui awft01at1on 

ot 1r. Blehu'd c. ~ '• eft"Vicse1 1D n to the Spec1al. Stud¥ Gi"oup 'a pJO~ect (un4er- the BSASAB). )).\a. llobertson we CbaUm!m ot the S,.Oial 

s~·aroug. 

E. B. Young/S/J.SSt/6"493/eJ. Oct 53 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 12-01-2014 pursuant to E .0. 1352a
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AutoInfo, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
Wunderlich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ William Wunderlich
---------------------------
William Wunderlich
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2002
~;. ~ .. 5Mat~ 

Mfi•ftor .:"r raD,O ~ lat'«!'Y~ 

l!Ml~ ~u.~ or~ 

n WI M)ltaficm Dl~i• 

069'"aJS~ 

....... Jililrr~ 

~ 

~ p.l tOl!r ~ ~ ~,) ~ l7J3 ,.... ~ ~ !d.sWZ at.i~nt Mi t.S:ttn•• 

pf'.1?Jt. ~. lft!e ~'7 ~ ftlll~ mt. b ~ .... 

-~-. • :r ~uti1 ~ ~~ 1' 

W •• !hi# ~ :b ~ a ~.al""J ti. O!qw 

W.t2•~ tbe actt.~ ~ ... ~-rr· to~ u. apedQ 

~ er ~:.ce ~·~ hr -•m w om- att"VS.~. 

Dill tdlt ~ tr,p& WI ltgab 1'l'l t.b1' ~ ftitt.n. 

•• AQ 

C/ii 

ti/11.fu-Z 

Sill 

"' .... ~. r..iblel" 

M/R1 Selt.-expl.mltocy • 

~. 

~.QAt-t y 11 '11.lilt!i~!f 

~ ll1 .tft't~·r1\ 

w, •• ~/AEMfl •ug ~ 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-20-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

-J---~ -~ -.....: - ~--
December 9, 2015

Dear Mr. Garcia:

This letter is to inform you th at the following information is missing from your petition (Docket

No. FAA

− 2015

− 3415). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture a nd Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove clos ed-set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your information has b een submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary in formation), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exe mptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the in formation described above by 12/23/15. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,
/S/
Brenda Robeson Program Analyst
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


        The following is a list of all subsidiaries of Premier Financial
Bancorp, Inc. and their state of incorporation.

        Subsidiary                                       State of Incorporation

Citizens Deposit Bank and Trust Company                         Kentucky

County Finance (a direct subsidiary of Citizens Deposit
   Bank and Trust Company)                                      Kentucky

Bank of Germantown                                              Kentucky

Georgetown Bancorp, Inc.                                        Kentucky

Georgetown Bank and Trust Company (a direct subsidiary
   of Georgetown Bancorp, Inc.)                                 Kentucky

Citizens Bank                                                   Kentucky

Premier Data Services, Inc.                                     Kentucky

Farmers Deposit Bancorp, Inc.                                   Kentucky

Farmers Deposit Bank (a direct subsidiary of Farmers
   Deposit Bancorp, Inc.)                                       Kentucky

The Sabina Bank                                                 Ohio

Ohio River Bank                                                 Ohio