alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1. 

v 6)2. 

/(}) 3. 

:... 

'- CD 4. 

L 

REF ID:ASe938 

• 

Branch Chief and Starr 

Roan 2025, Showing cryptographic eq1:1ipment in operation. 

Roan 2209, Analysis Preparation Unit showing cryptographed traffic _ b~ing processed. _ 

Machine Analysis Unit showing work on certain cryptographic equipment. .,,. ...... i. c.> 

Viola~;ions Unit, Roam 2024 

Publications Section, Ro 

I Rqan 2400 

,/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 07-25-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
SHOT A 

To be taken from behind L .• desk in the ChiDa. Area 

in such a way that significant n his desk are in the hand 

while three rows of tables with 

f'our girls each handJ,ing pil raw traffic and 0 dit" books are in 

\ 
• 

SHOT B 

REF ID : A58 9~ 

• 

To be taken from behind Mr. Miller's desk - probably requiring 

the move a file cabinet. Maps and gazetteers will be in evidence 

plus a drawer or two of place name cards on Mr. Miller's desk while 

extra maps will be dummied up on any blank wall space to complete 

the background. 

Mr. Miller, and Mr. Bliss plus T/5 Thpmpson in f'oregound with 

regular complement of personnel sitting at other desks and 

typewriters. 
SHOT C 

REF ID:A58~8 

-

To be taken in the Control Room with lajor Taylor, all area 

officers, and possibly Capt. Elsas sitting wt the conference table. 

Capt. Calvet and Capt Diggs will be standing at a situation map 

at the head of the table. The shot to be taken from the corner 

of the room nearest the corridor door so that the net maps 1Pil the 

walls will present a suitable background.
##### 



BY HAND DELIVERY
 January 24, 2007
 Aslam Malik
President, AMPAC FINE CHEMICALS LLC
 Notice of Eligibility
AMPAC FINE CHEMICALS LLC SEVERANCE PAY PLAN
  Notice of Eligibility
 Covered Employee. Covered Employee
 Severance Benefit. Severance Benefit




---



##### 



1 th
 Other Compensation or Benefits.
 General Release.
 No Re-employment.
 Confidentiality: You specifically agree that
your obligation to maintain the confidentiality of this Notice of Eligibility is a material term of
this Notice of Eligibility without which the Company would not have entered into this Notice of
Eligibility. Therefore, you agree that any violation of the terms of this provision will obligate
you to refund the value of all benefits granted to you pursuant to this Notice of Eligibility.
 
 1
    
    As defined by Section 409A of the Internal
Revenue Code, the regulations thereunder, and any other published interpretive
authority, as issued or amended from time to time.




---



##### 



Nondisparagement.
 Miscellaneous.
  Sincerely,AMPAC FINE CHEMICALS LLCBy:Ampac Fine Chemicals LLC OfficerAMERICAN PACIFIC CORPORATIONBy:American Pacific Corporation Officer




---



##### 



Aslam MalikDate:




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 GENERAL RELEASE
  i.e.,
 A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or
suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have
materially affected his settlement with the debtor.
 Signature of EmployeeDate:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court Cause No. DA 2 1

- 0 2 62

__________________________________________________________________ IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

DEVON E. MILLER

,

Petitioner / Appell ee
,

and

BRIAN T. MILLER

,

Respondent / Appell ant

. ORDER DISMISSING

APPEAL

This matter came before the Court on the parties ’ S t ipulated Motion to

Dismiss Appeal

, filed pursuant to M.R.App. P. 16( 5 ). Having considered the same,

and for good cause shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed.

DATED and electronically signed as indicated below.

Electronically signed by:

Jim Rice Justice, Montana Supreme Court August 23 2021

08/23/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0262
<PAGE>   1



                                                                   Exhibit 28(a)



                      REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ON
                          FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE


To the Board of Directors of
CITATION Computer Systems, Inc.


Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our report
dated May 7, 1997, appearing on page 28 of the Financial Information for the
Year the Ended March 31, 1997 insert of the 1997 Annual Report to Shareholders
of CITATION Computer Systems, Inc. (which report and consolidated financial
statements are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB)
also included an audit of the Financial Statement Schedule included on page 24
of this Form 10-KSB. In our opinion, this Financial Statement Schedule presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in
conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements.




PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
May 7, 1997
exv10wa






Exhibit 10.a




October 6, 2008




Mr. Thomas C. Tiller

Polaris Industries Inc.

2100 Highway 55

Medina, MN 55340




	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Re:
	 	Employment Agreement; Transition Matters






Dear Mr. Tiller:




     On behalf of the Board of Directors of Polaris Industries Inc., a Minnesota corporation, I am
writing to confirm our understanding regarding your continuing employment with Polaris. As you
know, your successor became Chief Executive Officer of Polaris on September 1, 2008 and your
employment as Chief Executive Officer ended on that date. On that date you became employed as a
Senior Program Advisor to Polaris to provide advice and counsel in the areas of new product
development and competitive product analysis and on other strategic matters within your experience
and expertise as may be reasonably requested by the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
of Polaris; provided that requests for such services shall not unreasonably interfere with your
other personal, charitable or other business activities.



     The terms and conditions of your Employment Agreement dated January 18, 2007, other than
Section 1 thereof which we have agreed to treat as being amended to provide for the new job
description and responsibilities described above, will remain in full force and effect.



     Please sign and return a copy of this letter confirming our understanding. This letter
agreement may be signed in counterparts, all of which may be considered one and the same agreement.



Very truly yours,




Polaris Industries Inc.




     /s/ Gregory R. Palen




By Gregory R. Palen

Chairman of the Board of Directors




Accepted and Confirmed:




October 6, 2008




	 	 	 
	/s/ Thomas C. Tiller
 


	 	 
	Thomas C. Tiller
.. •-.... . •. J. .• .II( •• >.4 ... t.14 . .l~ ..... P .. , ........ __ }$...Q .. ..£ ) .. 

·--
REF ID:A523023 

-

i. n. l'orty-tirst lleet1Da ot the Armed Forcea Secur1ty AgeDJ:::y 

r.ouno11 Will be bel4 at J.330 on w~, 17 l'e'bliar7 ~, 1a Boca. 

B 687 1 11at1caal J>eteme Bu.tl4ing. 

2. All agenc1a vUl be Ciraulatea prior to the maetiDg. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 05-14-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

23 
---------~~~~~~~~-~ - -----· 

REF ID:A5230~ 

• 

AamD J'<BCliB mmr.rl' ACDCY C<DICll. 

.AOBllJ:M\ i'OR 

rorty-tirat Meet1DS to be bel4 at 1330, 

Vec1Des4ay I 17 7ebruary 1954 I in Boca 

2& 687, Jlat1Cllf.\l. l>eteDse Ju1,lcltng. 

u.itemm.t GeDeral Ralp J. Canine, WA., Cha1rman 

Date of' Im.tial - donsr&;:at1m Item for Caaeic1erat1cn 

23 

u.a. Jomt Chi~ 

of Statt 

! .
J.' 

NRVAPPROVED FOR • 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

iQ 

(4) 

(.0 

EJ2C2CFTC552XQTWEEPZ 

-MX XX 

3 E C C C T 1523181 wITE CHARGE 7272 • 

FRIORITY WHIG. 

IAN 

FOR LT COL KE MP FR OM COL D I ET RICH' 

SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO QUEST IONS -REGARDING . MOL 

VANAGEMENT. RESPONSIBIL IES 

FART I. THE CURRENT/MOL 'D&FS..FOR FY.767. (67-11O-12) . AND 158 . 

• (68-11C-18) ARE ADEQUATE CDR :ALL. fistOL CONTRACTS EVEN THOUGH 

• THE CURRENT MOt SE ACK CONTRACTS HAVE ...USED THE BLANKET. 

D&F. • . , : .• : . 

PART I I THE FOLLOW NG. ARE THE MAJOR DIFFERENCES IT14-1 

REFERENCES TO DOCUMENTS THAT s19qut..0..eE...ON FILE . I N GEM 

BERG'S OFFICE. ' • ' • •.'-"..-••• • 

STR I BUT ION OF :CONTRACTS 15 LIMITED. TO. ONE COPY EACH 

TO CONTRACTOR, GEN. 'BERG S • OFFICE ..1 N .111ASHINGT.ON, CONTRACT. . 

FILE IN SPO, •AND ACO (IF CONTRACT I.5 ADM NI ST ER ED Sy AN .AC04.. 

2. QUARTERLY .REPORTS. ARE. SUM ITTED DIRECTLY ::T O. •THE •• 

SECRETARY.' CONTAINING. I NFOR MAT ION THAT-•MAY....BE. JRE QUI RED 

-BY ASPR CR AFP I THE-. DES•I RED PERIOD OF REPORT t :. • 

ESTABL I SHED AT -THE ,SECRETARY'SDISCRETION` -.-NO OTHER 

• REPORTS SUCH AS THE. DD..,•350 AM).Ii-23 ARE ::.SUBMITTED.. 

?ECIFIC DEV I ATI ONS OR ;WAIVERS .ARE 'NOT • REQUIRED. 

3. SUBCONTRAC TS: THE FOLLOWI ND REFERENCES:CONTAIN 

CCOU',IENT AT I ON .ON HOW. TO. .HAWLE REQUIREME NTS• :SY •L 

A14D : ST ILL NOT VIOLATE SECUR I TY, LETTER. ,FROM. MAX GULOCN 

TO CEN GREEK DATED :6.: JUNE 61, . SUBJECT.; ....SUBCONTRACT I ND I Ft 

COVERT PROGRAMS; WHICH :•REFERS :T.D.. A 2 ,MAY... -61...LETTER 

SAME SUBJECT, FROM CEN GOLDEN. AN • ADD! TI ONAL 

PARAGRAPH OF ASPR .WAS ADDRESSED.- I N •GEN..I.IART IN LETTER..7:. 

TJ SAFGC DATED 1 JOE 66,-SUBJECT ■,.."WAIVER OF AS:PR THE 

VIO WAS I INDORSED BY .coKuR.RENcE.• DYE. BURT.:GOODWI N. ANDFDP,'NARDED TO SAES? .DY Y 0 51" .9 SEP-. 66, -.SAME SUBJECT. 

DELEGATION AS HEAD OF A PR:OCUR !NG ACT I ‘itTY z. REFERENCE 

• .23 JUNE 65 MEMO S I GNU). --(3'Y SECRET AR Y BR OCKOAY t4CMILL AN 

:SUBJECTDELEGAT I ON OF - .AUTHORITY. AND:A/ES:NH:AT I ON: AS HE AD1 

CF A PROCURING ACTIVITY. • . OTE: I F -THERE IS TO SE AUTHORITY 0,..CONTRACT ON TEE 

TEST COAST ; WHI CH I N MY BELIEF• ESSENTIAL.FOR I SSUING 

',I, J. ' drThr IT , , 
CONTRACT. CHANGES, TECHNICAL QIRECTION:AND CONTRACTING 

TFICER DETERMINATIONS, THEN 1HERE MUST BE SOME TYPE 

REDELEGATION TO GEN SLEYRAIER AND POSSIBLY C(L HERAN 

AND/OR MYSELF APPROVED -BY THE SECRETARY .AN 'EXAMPLE 

IS CONTAINED IN 21i JUNE 66.MEMO BY SEC. FLAX„ SUBJECT': 

RAENDEO REDELEGATION OF PROCUF:EMENT:AUTHORITY4 

gf C E T .
# CE2004078EN.01092101.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/921 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/921

---

(2004/C 78 E/0974)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0057/04

by Camilo Nogueira Román (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(20 January 2004)

Subject:   Welfare expenditure in the Spanish state and the situation in the EU

Subject:

According to the Spanish National Statistical Institute, welfare expenditure in the Union accounted for 28,4 % of GDP in 1995 but only 27,3 % in 2000. Spending per inhabitant per annum varies enormously between Member States — from EUR 7 754 in Denmark and 7 035 in Germany to EUR 3 715 in the Spanish state and 3 765 in Portugal, the latter two being the lowest levels in the EU.

Does the Commission intend to take any type of economic or legislative measures aimed at reducing this disturbing gap affecting the populations of the different Member States?

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(23 February 2004)

(23 February 2004)

The Treaty of the European Union establishes in Article 137 that the Community shall support and complement the activities of Member States in the field of social security and social protection of workers, and allows the Council to adopt measures designed to encourage cooperation between Member States, excluding any harmonisation of their laws and regulations.

In this context, the Commission does not intend to propose any financial or legislative measures aimed directly at reducing the differences in per capita spending on social protection as these would amount to a substantial interference of the EU in the organisation and financing of social protection systems, which should remain a competence of Member States.

The Commission prefers to encourage Member States to become increasingly engaged in the modernisation of social protection systems through the application of the open method of coordination which is based on common objectives, monitoring of performances through common indicators and the exchange of experiences.

Moreover, differences in social protection expenditure per inhabitant are not only determined by policy, as they also reflect different levels of economic performance, age structures and the strength of informal solidarity networks as those based on the family.

It should also be noted that the evolution over time of social protection expenditure as a share of gross domestic product (GDP) is generally countercyclical. The share rises as growth slows down and falls during an economic upswing.

---
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### AUG 17 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
TERRY F. WALLING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHARLES SIMMONS, Kansas Secretary of Corrections, Defendant-Appellee. No. 98-3115 (D.C. No. 94-CV-3398) (District of Kansas)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before PORFILIO , KELLY , and HENRY , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. **See** Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.- 2 -

Terry F. Walling appeals the order of the district court granting summary judgment against him on his complaint for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief. Our review of the records reveals the district court did not err in its judgment, and we AFFIRM for the same reasons given by the district court in its order.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT John C. Porfilio Circuit Judge
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-1261

___________

Hany Fahmy Basily, *

*

Petitioner, *

* Petition for Review of

v. * an Order of the Board

* of Immigration Appeals.

Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General *

of the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Respondent. *

___________

Submitted: December 16, 2009

Filed: December 16, 2009

___________

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Egyptian citizen Hany Fahmy Basily petitions for review of an order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) which denied his June 2008 motion to reopen,

reconsider, and remand. After careful review, we conclude that the BIA acted within

its discretion, see Vargas v. Holder, 567 F.3d 387, 391 (8th Cir. 2009); Miah v.

Mukasey, 519 F.3d 784, 789-90 (8th Cir. 2008), and that the alleged due process

violation did not affect the outcome of the proceedings, see Banat v. Holder, 557 F.3d

886, 893 (8th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we deny the petition.

______________________________
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1530 

To renew certain Moving to Work agreements for a period of 10 years. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 9, 2015 

Ms. MIKULSKI (for herself and Mr. CARDIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To renew certain Moving to Work agreements for a period 

of 10 years. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keeping Moving to 

5 Work Promises Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RENEWAL OF MOVING TO WORK AGREEMENTS. 

7 (a) DEFINITION.—In this section— 

8 (1) the term ‘‘covered agreement’’ means a 

9 Moving to Work demonstration program agreement 

10 between a public housing agency and the Secretary 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1530 IS

1 pursuant to section 204 of the Departments of Vet2 erans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, 

3 and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1996 

4 (42 U.S.C. 1437f note) that— 

5 (A) provides for the use of an alternative 

6 operating fund formula; and 

7 (B) is in effect on the date of enactment 

8 of this Act; and 

9 (2) the term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary 

10 of Housing and Urban Development. 

11 (b) RENEWAL OF AGREEMENTS.— 

12 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall renew 

13 each covered agreement for a period of 10 years. 

14 (2) PROHIBITION ON CHANGES TO FINANCIAL

15 TERMS.—In renewing a covered agreement under 

16 paragraph (1), the Secretary may not make any sig17 nificant change to the financial terms of the covered 

18 agreement. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-82,935-01
IN RE JOSE ARTURO VERG ARA, Re lator
ON AP P LICATION FOR AWRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 2011CR000560 D4 (A ) IN THE 406TH DISTRICT COURT F ROM WEBB COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamu s p u rsuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in the 406th District Court of Webb County , t h at m o re than 35 day s have elapse d, and that the application has not y et bee n forwa rded to this Court. I n these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. Respondent, the District Clerk of Webb County , is or dere d to f

ile a response , which may be made by submitt ing the rec ord on such habea s corpus application, submitt ing a copy of a timely filed order that desig nates issues to be investiga ted ( see McCree v. Hampton , 824 S.W .2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that Relator has2

not filed an a

pplication for a

writ of habe as cor

pus in W ebb County . Should the response include
an order desig nating issues, proof of the date the district attorney ’s office was serve d with the habea s application shall also be submitt ed with the response . This application for leave to fi le a writ of mandamus shall be held in abey ance until Respondent has submitt ed the appropr iate response . Such response shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order.

Filed: Mar ch 18, 2015 Do not publish
ex104.htm


    Exhibit
10.4

     

    
      	 	
              

            	 
	 	 	 
	
              ENVIRONMENTAL
      AND PUBLIC PROTECTION CABINET

            
	 	 	 
	Steven
      L. Besher	
              Department
      of Natural Resources

            	
               Robert
      D. Vance

            
	Governor	
              Division
      of Oil and Gas Conservation

            	
               Secretary

            
	 	
              Post Office Box
      2244

            	 
	 	
              Frankfort, KY
      40601

            	
               Susan
      C. Bush

            
	 	
              Phone: (502)
      573-0147 Fax: (502) 573-1099

            	
               Commissioner

            
	 	
              www.dogc.ky.gov

            	 


    

     

    April
28, 2008

     

     

    ADVENTURE
ENERGY, INC

    33
6TH STREET S, SUITE 600

    ST.
PETERSBURG, FL 33701

     

     

     

     

    Dear
Sir

     

    Pursuant to 805
KAR 1:190(3) you have been issued Gathering Line Operaters License
GL018724500001. This license is effective for calendar year 2008 and is subject
to annual renewal at the begining of each calendar year.

     

     

    Sincerely,

     

     

    /s/ James P.
Gallagher 

    
      

    

    James P.
Gallagher

    Division of Oil
and Gas Conservation

     

    CC:

     

    
    

     

    
      	KentuckyUnbridledSpirit.com	
              

            	
               An Equal
      Opportunity Employer M/F/D
#### Olson vs. Paul.

*October 14*

*October 31, 1882.*

FORECLOSURE oe Mortgage. *Filing notice of*lis pendens.

A notice of the pendency of an action to foreclose a mortgage, though duly filed, is inoperative before the filing of the complaint: and judgment in the action cannot be entered until twenty days after the complaint is filed.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *La Croase*County.

The case is stated in the opinion.

For the appellant there was a brief by *M. P. Wing*and *G. C.*Prentiss, and oral argument by *Mr. Wing.*

For the respondent there was a brief by Cameron, *Losey dh Bwrm,*and oral argument by *Mr. Bunn.*

LyoN, J.

The action was brought to have a deed of land, absolute on its face, executed by the plaintiff to defendant, adjudged a mortgage, and to have the same canceled, for the reason that the condition upon which it was given had been fully performed by the plaintiff. The.answer admits the deed was given as security for the performance of certain conditions by the plaintiff, denies performance, and contains a counterclaim for its foreclosure as a mortgage. When the cause was called for trial, the plaintiff discontinued his action. The cause was then tried on the counterclaim and *31reply, and resulted in a judgment for defendant of foreclosure and sale. Notice of pendency of the action was filed in the office of the register of deeds, by the defendant, more than twenty days before judgment, but the answer was not filed in the court until the judgment was entered. The plaintiff appeals from the foreclosure judgment. Counsel for defendant admits that the filing of notice of the pendency of the action was ineffectual because the answer was not filed twenty days before judgment, and hence very properly concedes that the judgment must be reversed for that reason. See R. S., p. 823, sec. 3187.

Counsel for plaintiff asks that the cause be remanded for a new trial. On a proper showing the circuit court is at liberty to grant a new trial, but this court is not sufficiently advised in the premises to order one.

*By the*Court.— The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause will be remanded for further proceedings according to law.
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement of Frank R. Martire



 Exhibit 10.1 
 METAVANTE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 OF 
 FRANK R. MARTIRE 

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is made as of the 1st day of November, 2008 by and between Metavante Technologies, Inc., a
Wisconsin corporation (“Metavante Technologies”), and Frank R. Martire (the “Executive”). 
 RECITALS 

WHEREAS, Metavante Technologies and the Executive are parties to that certain Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) dated
as of November 1, 2007; and 
 WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Employment Agreement to reflect a change in the
Executive’s title; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to change the Executive’s title from “President and Chief Executive
Officer” to “Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer”. 
 2. Section 10(b)(ii)(C) is revised to read “a
material diminution of the Executive’s title from Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. “ 
 3. Except as set forth
above, no other changes are made to the Employment Agreement and the Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the date set forth above. 
  

			
	METAVANTE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Donald W. Layden, Jr.

	Name:	 	Donald W. Layden, Jr.
	Title:	 	Senior Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
	
	 /s/ Frank R. Martire

	Frank R. Martire