alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

___________________________

No. 97-30648 Summary Calendar

___________________________

IRAJ HORMOZI,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

GULF STATES UTILITIES COMPANY; ENTERGY CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees.

___________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court For the Middle District of Louisiana

(96-CV-3222)

___________________________________________________ February 13, 1998

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

In his Petition for Rehearing, Hormozi calls to our attention

Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc. , No. 96-1291, 1998 WL 23157 (U.S.

Jan. 26, 1998), recently decided by the United States Supreme Court

and rendered after our prior decision affirming the d ismissal of

Hormozi’s claim s under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act2

(“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq

.

Oubre invo lved facts substantially similar to the case at

hand. The plaintiff accepted a termination agreement and signed a

release of all claims against her employer. The plaintiff received

severance pay in installments in consideration for the release.

After receiving the final payment, the plaintiff brought suit under

the ADEA. The release did not comply with the requirements for

releases set forth in the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act

(“OWBPA”), 29 U.S.C. § 626(f). The employer argued that the

plaintiff had ratified the defective release by failing to return

or offer to return the severance money she had received. The

Supreme Court disagreed, holding “that the release cannot bar the

ADEA claim because it [did] not conform to the statute,” and that

the plaintiff’s retention of the severance pay did not amount to a

ratification equivalent to a valid release of the ADEA claims,

“since the retention did not comply with the OWBPA any more than

the original release did.” Oubre , 1998 WL 23157, at *4.

In our original opinion affirming the district court’s grant

of summary judgment to the Appellees based on Hormozi’s failure to

return benefits received in consideration of his release, we relied

heavily on Wamsley v. Champlin Ref. and Chems., Inc. , 11 F.3d 534

(5th Cir. 1993). To the extent that Wamsley conflicts with the

Supreme Court’s decision in Oubre , it is overruled.

In this appeal, Appellees concede that the release signed by

Hormozi does not comply with the requirements set forth in the

OWBPA, 29 U.S.C. § 626(f). Thus, Hormozi’s release is invalid and,3

under Oubre , cannot be ratified by his failure to tender back the

consideration he received. Therefore, we GRANT Hormozi’s motion

for rehearing and now REVERSE the district court’s grant of summary
judgment to Appellees and REMAND the case for further proceedings

consistent with this opinion.

REHEARING GRANTED.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Exhibit 10.1


 


October 22, 2008


 


Peter B. Knepper


 


Dear Peter:


 


Reference is made to that certain Employment Letter
dated April 16, 2008 (“Agreement”) between International Rectifier
Corporation (the “Company”) and Peter B. Knepper (the “Employee”).  The Company and Employee hereby amend the
Agreement, effective as of October 6, 2008, as follows:


 


1.  Effective October 6,
2008, your position and title shall be Vice President – Finance and Accounting,
reporting to the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, Ilan Daskal.


 


2.  The
Agreement shall have a term concluding December 31, 2008, in lieu of any
notice required under the Section of the Agreement entitled “Termination”.


 


3.  The Section entitled
“Cash Bonus” is hereby deleted.


 


4.
The parties agree to reasonably cooperate with each other in connection with
any civil litigation that relates to the subject matter of the Investigation
and related governmental investigations, proceedings or actions, currently
pending, or that may be filed, against or involve the Company, and/or its
current or former officers and/or directors except to the extent that a party
deems such cooperation as contrary to its interests.  Nothing herein shall modify or supersede any
of the provisions of that certain Indemnification Agreement, dated September 15,
2008, between the Company and Employee.


 


5.  If following Employee’s employment with the
Company, Employee continues to provide third party services as a partner of
Tatum, LLC. (“Tatum”) or another consulting company, then upon reasonable
request from the Company, and subject to Employee’s reasonable availability,
Employee would provide services to the Company under a separate consulting
services agreement negotiated in good faith and 
entered into between Tatum (or such other consulting company) and the
Company.


 


Except as set forth
herein, the Agreement remains unmodified and in full force and effect.


 


Please sign below and return a signed copy of this
letter to indicate your agreement with its terms and conditions.


 


	
  Sincerely yours,

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER CORPORATION

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Acknowledged and agreed by:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  EMPLOYEE:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Signature:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Print Name: Peter B. Knepper
USCIB: 8.4/6 

20 January 1955 

TOP sg~ 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

References: 

U.S. Monitoring ActivitiesLJ 

(a) USCIB 8.4/1, dated 6 December 1954· 

(b) USCIB 8.4/5, dated 4 January 1955. 

1. The proposal contained in reference (a), amended as suggested in 

reference (b), was approved by USCIB on 14 January 1955. 

?A 

-. . 

OGA 

2. Accordingly the enclosed revised "page 211 is forwarded for insertion in enclosure 1 with reference (a). The original 11page 211 should be 

destroyed. The revision contains ·changes in paragraphs 11 and 12. 

Enclosure 

a/s 

USCIB: S.4/6 

~ve ~ Secretary, USCIB 

Il-kNBLEi VIA 60HIN'f 0H:A:N!H!B:B ON:E.¥ 

TOP SECRET eclassified and approved for release by NSA 

n 10-21-2014 ursuantto E.O. 13526 
USCIB: 8.4/5 ~· OGA 4 January 1955 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

2 IJ. 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

!r.iEMORANDUM. FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

References: 

U.S. Monitoring Acti vities._I _ ____, 

(a) USCIB 8.4/1, dated 6 December 1954. 

(b) USCIB 8.4/2, dated 15 December 1954. 

l. In connection with the USCIB decision reported in reference (b), 

representatives o:f NSA, CIA, OSD, Army, Navy, and Air Force have agreed 

upon the :following rewording o:f paragraph 12 of the enclosure\.with 

reference (a): 

2. In addition to the above, the Director, NSA, in informing the 

Executive Secretary that the CIA member of USCIB has agreed to the 

following proposed rewording of paragraph 11 of the same document, has 

requested that lBCIB approval of this amendment be sought: 

3. It is considered that the amendment set forth in paragraph 1, 

above, requires no further action by USCIB, having been approved in 

advance by the Board in the decision contained in reference (b). 

4. The amendment proposed in paragraph 2, above, is submitted herewith under interregnl.llil procedure with a request that any objection to this 

revision be communicated to this office by 1700, Friday, 14 January 1955. 

USCIB: 8.4/5 

TOP SECRET 

'•
I . 9eri1tlt ;;; 7 4 ~ 

' srnosl 

.... Mio Wi:Wrel 

Our MCU1"1ty peqple •ve called to 111 &t.tentiOQ the 

fllet ~the Penooal H1.st<:tr;( at&tement ~1tted \q 

ar. htta tw ti. ~ proeuaeiDS requ.1red fffZ' 

•1d.oi:a:t 

~ Seeur1t7 ~ -.ttera 41.d. iaot «m:tain the -- to ..... 70U evo;r lleen retu.ed. a \fobd.t" M14 "U ., 4IQl!pl.ain." 

DQe to tbe lbcatioc ot tmM ~ on t-. t0l'tlt 1 

it 1.a quite tmderat.aodol>la tJat they' could be 1.mdTerlently ~looked, fl.the?' in to. aatua1 proceaa ot fill ins in tlxw 

tw:a, at ill 'tntlscribillg it to a t;rped. eogy, m1 l feel 

fUl'e that vaa ~ cue b ~ ~. 

l aa "1t'r¥ to baT8 to Voul>l.e JW vtth 'Shi• mtttt, wt~ awree1ate it a,roa,tl,y u JOU. vou14 eena 1;t., 

u:u!ed id'or.:Gt1on to u in tbe enc~ llMnNCd etmtl~· 

x. ... • J6cIXJHA.1D 

Anitta.nt to W111S&11 F. l'J'iedmn 

a.cutive leerota.r1 

SA hientttio Mvi.eor.I' aoa:n1 

ccs M 

c/r; 

8/J.SST (Mr. P'riednrw.) 

SEC M/R: Requesting additiaaal int'orllBtion trotn Dr. Suits 

to be placed on hie PEB. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
l 

f 

ii. 

l 

• i 

l . 

REF ID:A63704 

-

18 January 1955 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Dear' Jlr. Lugent 

I bave been ~ a repJ.y!JJa to '3fNZ' letter or 8 Jlecal)er 

3 .. 954 but 1t took a. while to get an aawr to 1ibe pat.ion JOU 

:raUed about t.bs ava1la'bU11;J" '4 )1-94- 4ev1cea. ITom the b.igbeat 

llOU1"Ce l'. eot an. ua"We~ recentl.Y to the etteet that there ue 

aore 1n the atorage aepota u:1 J.on&er and theret'ore none v1ll 

be available ~or aale as *1J:tplue pro}lel't,y. Jly source •14 be 

thought tbs.t while thq adght haft beea pu.t OA ale acme JU.1'8 

eao the greatest qU&ntit.7 waa probe.'blJ' .U..:posed ot ea J'Ll.Dk 

elmdzrum. I regre-t iq inability to bel.p 70u. acquire one ot 

'hese obHl.ete &nicee. 

~ JOU tar the picture ~ 7a.Jr ~le Pla;ytair Jl&tr:lx. 

!his reaed>lea 1a a WIQ' certa.u pzl.e• v.bich you 'bu;r ~or chUcJren 

and grown-upJ lD the wq at ms.trice• 'With llOYl!able blocks. 

V:lth 1"9aa:tc1 to the at!Oendum to tho Poe articlo, ~uet. aa 9aOn 

u X pt •a.thing 1A vrl.Un,g which vUl tell. m tba't tbe Sigml 

Corpe 1'Ul.let1na no lOQ&er ba.'ft u.;y clasatt1cat1cm, 1 vUl 1mov 

1ibat to do. I lave been tr.r1ng to pt a ata~ 1n v.riting 

but tb.UI tar without eucces1 .. 

With beat rega.rdas1 I aa, 

' I 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 06-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

I I t/ 

I
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         10486
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               18400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    16304
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                        97554
<ALLOWANCE>                                    2367
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 144505
<DEPOSITS>                                     128555
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            646
<LONG-TERM>                                    1274
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       30176
<OTHER-SE>                                     (22440)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 144505
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                2573
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              413
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               2986
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             729
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             778
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          2208
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1860
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                274
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     274
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   274
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .03
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 6.83
<LOANS-NON>                                    0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   31
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               3048
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               2364
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  14
<RECOVERIES>                                   17
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              2367
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           2367
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0
        


</TABLE>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00235-CV

SUPERIOR CRUDE GATHERING, INC.

v.

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

On Appeal from the

319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2013-DCV-2007-G

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 31, 2014
FROM: SUSLO LONDON 

TO: U C 

REF ID:A522696 

~ NAVSECURITYSTA WASH 

161445Z 16 APR 51/RJH 

ROUTINE 

S-21526 

T=O·P 6•£-0=R-E=T A-&=6•RwN 

j 

:i' : 

RE MY 111125Z. PAPERS GIVING BRITISH VIEWS ON TECHNICAL 

ASPECTS FRENCH DIPLOMATIC AND MILITARY CIPHER SECURITY 

FORWARDED BY SUSLO THIS n\TE IN PACKAGE NUMBER SUSLO 3¢70 

NAVSECSTA ROUTING: 

ACTION: AFSA~123 ••••• 

AFSA•131 ...... 

PARAPHRASE NOT REQUIRED. 

CONSULT CRYPTOCENTER BEFORE DECLASSIFYING. 

161445Z 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-03-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
... 

{ 

f' - .. - ... - (~-

(Basic ltr: JAG, D/A, of 25 Feb 19 5.3, subJ: H. R. 1152, 8.3rd 

Congress, lat Session, a Bill "For the Relier of --

William F. Friedman") 

lst Ind 

National SecurJ.ty Agency, Washington 25, D. c. 

Serials 953 

6 Mar 53 

TO: Judge Advocate General, Department or the Army, The Pentagon 

l. I note that the subJect bill is identical with those 

introduced in the last Congress. My views remain in all respects 

those expressed in the indorsement referred to in paragraph l or 

the basic letter. 

2. Mr. Friedman's current Civil Service title is Research 

Consultant; his organizational title is Special Assistant (to the 

Director). His compensation was increased on 29 April 1951 from 

$10,750 per year to $11,000 per year (step increase) and to 

$11,SOO on 27 October 1951 (general pay increase). 

Incl: 

n/c 

CC: AG 

C/S 

S/Asst 

R/D (2) 

3012 

3024 

RALPH J. CANINE 

Major General, US Army 

Director 

M/R: The indorsement is self-explanatory. The AG has in his files 

the l:ackground materJ.S.1 relating to this matter. (See 1st Ind, 29 Feb 52, 

.fm DIRAFSA to JAG, D/A.) 

HENRY B. STAUFFER.R/D:4 Mar 53 

ILP .17237: 6029.3 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 08-29-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

,. / 

-- .. 

.. 

- - -

= -=-- .z 

I 

r

--..,,..-;:r 

~ . -... 

_:_ --

- ---

l -=----

r-=---

r-~~--- =--=- -- ~-- - --

r f ---- - ~- - - = - -- -
United States Court of A ppeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 29, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 04-50730

_____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellee

v. RICHARD AARON FIELDS Defendant - Appellant

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (04-CR-86)

---------------------
Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

IT IS ORDERED that Appellee’s moti on to vacate the sentence is granted.

IT I S FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s motion to remand the

case to the Western District of Texas, Waco Division for resentencing is granted.

________________

* Pursuant to 5 th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circ umstances set forth in 5 t h Cir. R. 47.5.4.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s alternative request

for an extension of time to file the Appellee’s brief 14 days from the denial of Appellee’s motion to vacate and remand is
denied as moot.
COZEN 

O'CONNOR 

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 

THE ARMY AND NAVY BUILDING 1627 I STREET, NW SUITE 1100 WASHINGTON, DC 

20006-1605 

202.912.4800 1.800.540.1355 202.861.1905 FAX www.cozen.com 

February 10, 2014 

VIA E-MAIL 

Ms. Catherine J. O'Toole 

Air Carrier Fitness Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Mark W. Atwood 

Direct Phone 202-463-2513 

Direct Fax 202-478-2751 

matwood@cozen.com 

Re: Application of Western Global Airlines, LLC, 

Dockets OST -2013-0105 and -0106 

Dear Ms. O'Toole: 

In response to your question regarding the record of Western Global and its key 

personnel in respect to accidents and incidents, the carrier states the following: In its 

application, Western Global states that as a start-up air carrier, it has not been involved in an 

accident or incident. Moreover, the applicant notes that neither it nor any of its key personnel, 

except as noted below, have been involved in an accident or incident in the five years preceding 

its application or at any time in the past which remains under investigation by the FAA, the 

National Transportation Safety Board, or the company itself. 

The only exception is Mr. William E. Phillips, who joined the carrier late last year as 

Chief Inspector. (A resume for Mr. Phillips was sent to the Department on December 9, 

2013.) Mr. Phillips held the same position at National Airlines at the time of its Boeing 747 

accident in Bagram, Afghanistan, April 29, 2013. That accident, which occurred on takeoff, 

resulted in destruction of the aircraft and loss of seven crewmembers. The accident is under 

investigation by the Afghan Civil Aviation Authority. It is Western Global's understanding that 

the NTSB is assisting in that investigation, but that no formal FAA or NTSB investigation is 

ongoing. No charges or enforcement actions have been taken against either National or Mr. 

Phillips. 

cc: Dockets OST -2013-01 05 and -01 06 

Mark W. Atwood 

Counsel for Western 

Global Airlines, LLC
--

-=---

~--

::c::.: . &=-

--

~--

-----

....................... ~ A•'f' - ., • .,,... .. • .. ~1-1-oi: 4 - - ._ •' ... ~ ~· 

- - - -~-~..1, _,._ - 11! - ~<:l:JJ.:-;".ll6_854-4.-'.:a:;;~.:-~.i"- .:..~ 

- -· - s ~ .. ,-... ~;.- .......... -~---- - ~--"f w;-~- - -==-- - r,-- -

...... 

Dr. Claude 1. Shannon 

a.11 TIWepbone Labol'atcrle• 

ll;anoq Bill, .. J .... 

Dear l>'t"e Sb1JJncm I 

On 21 Jv.11' of l.ut. 1eaz" t.he plb)Scat.tons U.ted 'benin 1Ml"8 

t~ed. to_~u ~~the ~vpt tl!a~ 1ihf11 91!8ht. be ot ae to 70u.1n 

._ct!cm .S.t.h 7~ ~ciration ta XA~' 

llat... t1cal Thoox7 ol Rel.aW Cipher Alphabets. 

leoUolla I and II. 

A11a1JSi8 ot a Mlehanico-aleet.riul Cl'.Jptogapb,, 

?U't:s I and II. 

1t at \.'le ..,... t.1.• '10U do llOt t1nd the• docaar.ta of 'PU"".J.• 

•\dal' 1nteNst oi- -. to 70u, .,..oll.d 1QU be 110 good u '° ntw.rn tibea 

to tbia ApilC)' at ~~rr earliest ceinTenie11oe tor l..\lle 1n M .xtcdal 

'1'a1n1nc propaa? S.Ca~• ot tr.a •peoia.1. -~1~7 _..uras invol~-1 

In ~ h&rlll.111.i and cure ot tbe documeat11, it. 1a r9q\Wsted that. tbeJ 

a. ret~ by registered ull to tbo A1SJC1 at t.• llddresa &1'hD 

'81.0WI 

m.nctoi-

-- roro~ ~~t7 Af;C'01 81f~Ulg'\OD 2S"L 1). C. 

lfin1 "lfio; "iilUJ {an p. Fri.., 

Vpon ftleaipt ot t.be doe~t•,, .acknowledgw1rt. ct~ mum wlll ..... to JOU.• 

PJ.e;,aff acco;t rq appreciat.ion ot 10ur co-operat.ion 1D th1o as 1n 

o\.'ler •t.~. v1t.b best 1'•hes am~ ho~ ot -1ng 10u 100r1 

ap1n, I• . - - - ~. 

~ -~ . ~ ~ CarA. M,tan8/~/2 Apr S2 

E_= . - - - ~~ftm·~~-~28/Ext. '°493 iiillFC111'#2L~5 ... • .!. -" • .. ~~(' w.y ;:.i,:··~.~~·"6:::..'1iila ~ ..... ~~ ....... ~,!;-?.~"~ ... :i.~r·.:.:.... ... 't' ~!·,."~..P'!t~' .. :-- ._,_ ... 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-16 2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
Lt. Colonel Winn '1. teller 

SU$ID Unit, :Bcot 55 

u.s. kv.r 100 

l'ew York, llew York. 

Dear Winna 

REF ID:A62627 

--

l2 llay J955 

Tou:r '1817 Dice note ot 29 Ap1"1l, together with the page trom 

the Stars and Stripes containing the articl.e about 'llV "Great Expectations, 11 ree.ched 1113' ot':tice on 10 ~ ud Kiss Jrox.tine 'brought 

it out to me yeateraa.y. Sambody- had mentioned to :ma that there 

waa a bit &bout it in the Stara and St.ripea but I lard.l;t expected 

to find aa mu.ch u the;y actuarcy pit into the article. I am. very 

glad to see it 1n that pa.per, 80 racy or m;y f'rienda in the Services 

will be 1ntereated and no doubt appreciate having word thereof'. 

Aa a mtter or tact, Admiral Wen,ger had already ZlOted 1t ud eent 

• hia congratulations but not the clipping. 

At the moment all I cam tell ;you about the Shakespeare manu-

•cript 1a that tbe prospective p.lbl1eher DOV ha• it bet'ore tlte 

Mitori&l :Board in Cambridge mid. we ought to hear aamething •oon .. 

We hope the vord will be tavorable. 

I am at heme nov and this 1• the aecond ds.y that X have been 

allowed to get dressed and :mcve about on the eecond :tloor mre 

than a :tev .-tepa. I a hoping soon to be allowed to go back to 

the ottice. 

I UBUlllt aild. hope tha.t we Will get a cha.nee to aee the 

Zeller• on their ~ to their next station. 

IJ!banke again &rJd. with very beat regards to llr'•· Zeller and 

all 11\Y :trienda there. 

81.nc:erely, 

WIIJ,IHC 7 • J'RDIIWI 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-17-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
REF ID:A63799 

• -

PERSONAL FOR CANINE 

CON!' IDElf!ttL 

ROUTINE 

FROM SUSLO LONDON 

TO DIR NSA 

MSG NR. IM 012 

DTG 061029Z JAN 55 

PERSONAL FOR CANINE FROM PULLING 

HUGH ALEXANDER AWARDED COMMANDER OF TEE BRITISH EMPIRE IN NEW YEARS 

HONORS LIST. HA VE CONGRATUIATED HIM IN YOUR NAME. THIS DISPATCH 

PREPARED WHEN YOURS ARRIVED 

.. --.. -

eclassified and a ro d for relea e b SA on 08-04-2014 ursuantto E.O. 13 2