alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Steven Silverman/DC/USEPA/US

To: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 06/20/2009 03:21 PM Subject: memo to docket
Keith, Could you please docket the following note? thks!

MEMORANDUM TO Cement NESHAP docket FROM Steven SIlverman, Attorney OGC RE: Conversations at Los Angeles public hearing At the July 16 public hearing on the proposed portland cement kiln NESHAP, I had a number of sidebar conversations relevant to the rule which conversations are summarized here. I spoke with Tr acy Goss of the California South Coast Air Quality Management District about the Cr +6 issue mentioned in the preamble. He stated that most of the fugitive emissions from the plant in question were the result of mo ving clinker around, rather than being from static piles. he also said that these fugitive emissions were in violation of State rules, and viewed the situation as a compliance issue. I also spoke with a cement industry consultant who was monitoring the hearing. I did not accurately catch his nam e. however, he said that the industry is especially concerned with achieving the proposed standards for THC and HCl, more so than the proposed mercury standards.
REF ID:A275324 

·6~ CZ,~1(£V -

From London, November 4th. 

CXG 877 

Following for STEVENS from TILTMAN. 

Reference your 519. Material supposed to have left 21/7 

many 

not yet received. Please investigate. Among/other training 

items it should have included English translation SACCO. This 

now urgently required in Kiddle East. 

by air? 

Can you send me some copies 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-16-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
I 

REF ID :A6717. 

~~ fPl 'f ",. t;l._, .. . I _. ' 

THE JOINT CHmFS OF STAFF 

Washington 25, n.c. 

Director, ConmnnicationsElectronica 

SE9RE'i' 

DCEM 201 

'Z1 April 1951 

MBIOlANDUK FOR: Director, Armed Forces Securit7 Agenc7 

Subject: Plan for the Provision of Crypto Channels for 

Horth Atlantic Treat;y Organization CODIDIWlicationa During the Planning Stage Using TJpelc 

II and Simplex Settings - Plugboard Setting 

Kqa and Books of Settings 

... 

1. 'Die Joint Cammmications-Electronics Comittee has 

been advised that the Standing Group has agreed that the 

Signat0J"7 Nations of the North Atlantic Treat7 Organization 

should be advised that in addition to Member Nations constructing their own plugboard setting ke1'8, should they 

so wish, there would be in addition no objection to their 

preparing individual National Books of Settings should this 

be desired in order still further to preserve the discreet 

nature of the channels provided for National use. 

2. 'Die foregoing is furnished for information and 8.1\Y 

action considered necessar;y. 

COPY
= 

-C:WF'ICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE -

WEAPONS SYSTEMS EVALUATION GROUP 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

6 June 1952 

Dear General Caniner 

Please allow me to thank you !or your letter of 17 li.a1' 1952, 

concerning the activities of SCAG. It is indeed eatie:t'ying to 

learn that you have found our eiforts of interest and value to 

ASFA. I, for one. wish to assure ;you that I will be most happy 

at 8.1V time to do what l can to assist your agency in accomplisnmg 

its critically important mission. 

I feel that there is one wq in which the original !lCAG may 

still be of some aBBistance to you. Our !indinga were put together 1n the raport which was presented to you and Admiral nenger 

at the conclusion ot the Karch meeting. Since that time several 

O! us have had the opportunity to discuss various aspects o! the . 

re~ort with Admiral Wenger,, Captain Harper, Ur. Friedmann, 

Dr. Campaigne and others in AFSA. In these inf'orr al discussion 

those o! us available had the opportunity to consider the conmenta 

or AFSA personnel on our reCODi.· endationa and !indinga, and to 

attempt to clarify our intent; unf'ortune.tely, however, most ot 

the out-or-t.own SCAG personnel did not take part in these 

discussions. I !alt, and still !eel, that it would be bighJ.T 

desirable to present. AFSA 1·a coJI111ents to t.he ent.ira SCAG,, for 

the purf()se or enabling SCAG to take them into consideration 

in expanding or clarif~ing various aspects of its »arch re}X>rt. 

I should like, therefore, to suibrest for your consideration __ that the original CiCAG be called together once more in the near 

tuture,, for the purpose o! di~cussing such aspects or its report 

as may eeem to AFSA to warrant cor.ment, and to give SCAG, as a 

body, the opportunity to repl.¥ to these conments. I have communicated these views to Ur. Engstrom and to llr. Speakman, 1'ho 

agreA in substance with thie su~estion. 

Kajor General Ralph J, l!anine 

Very sincerely yours, 

- -

H. P. ROBERTSON 

Director or Research 

Director, Armed Forces eecurity AgoncT @ -l 

eclassified and 

pproved for 

elease by NSA 

n 09-12-2014 

ursuant to E.O. 

3526 

Dej.&rtment or Defense @!E(S;ll1J!m~ff ~~~(ft}OOj~J\f~.M·OO 

#r· 0- :~.shington 25' n,. fONFIDENTIAL ?s. """w
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 11



             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                       Three Months Ended March 31
                                       ---------------------------
                                             1999        1998
                                             ----        ----

<S>                                         <C>         <C>
Weighted Average Common
Stock Outstanding                           5,818,588   4,920,802

Options Outstanding                                 0     123,300

Options Exercised                                   0           0
                                            ---------   ---------
                                            5,818,588   5,044,102
                                            =========   =========
Income (loss)                                (629,226)      4,282
                                            =========   =========

Income (loss) Per Share                        $ (.11)     $  .00
                                            =========   =========

</TABLE>
Proreusor Cbe.rlea Herring 

Colonna.de Club 

Univera1ty pf Virginia 

Charlottesville, Virgin:ta. 

REF ID:A62823 

21. Apri.1 1955 

Xt. will eeem illlproba.ble btlt it'• quite true that tor aoveral. 

J1011tbe I have 'been meant.na to write you and urge that 1:t you come 

to Washington e.t. aey t.im, we ba.ve a. guest room. wicb we abould. be 

very happy to have J'Ol.l occuw. At the time you \IQre here in the 

f'all the twP ~ on the third f'loor had not 'been decorated but 

tbey b&ve nov t'or acme t1lm past been ready to receive guests. 

JV lluaba.nd and I bad an extremezy bectic end ot the year in 

1954- because w wre not only r1ish1tig the book to completion to the 

p.iblillhera bUt bad been tu:"ged to enter it in the competition ~ the 

Folger Shakespeare Library.. J'uat bet ore Christ.ms we both :tell 

victum to a. v:l.nla intectionJ 1ff¥ husband we.a in. bed with ~"er tor 

nearJ.¥ two weeu. The hol~a i:est with our seeiDg no one and with 

& turke~l.eas hiatus. We had, bowver, mna,ged to get the JIB1ll18cript 

ott on the very laat daY or the year. 

On J"ebruary 18th 'l1f;f husband :Clew to Europe and arter a very bu.By 

t'ive weelte be returned, •pent f'ive 4ays at hi• office on otticial re-

}lOrta &nd •uch matters then waa victum ot a. heart attack 'Which "nt 

hill to George Washington Univera1ty" Hospital lo/here he still Ia. I 

ui glad to repo1."t that the Doctora ~ hi• progress u aatietactoq but insi•t that be J!IUSt •ta.Y in the hospital tor a.ppraxima.tely two 

weeks J.oo&er am. then have & month'• re.at at haoo. 

While ha vaa in Europa I received the notitication th&t we bad wn 

the Folger aw.rd tor the beat :manuscript 81.l.bmitted 1n the :tield or 

ZJ.1zabetban literature. We were uked not to me.Im AlV" c.nnounce.ment 

untU the public pre&a release waa ;made.. i'he nevs appeared on April 

Jrd in at lea.at Bew Tork and Wuh.1.I3gton xax>ers. I aa enclos1Dg t"W'O 

copies at the WaahiJlgton. stories. The o:oe pe.ir to So, U' you. will be 

If<> kind, to Colone1 ~ llr•.. Zipf'.. Pleaae convey to them our cooaratu~ 

lat1ons on the arri"fal or the da.lJahter &rl4. GFf!ss the numeroua Yieia-

•itudee. which bu prievented. JQ" writing to Be•s.- I have, .mch to '1JJjf 

d.iaiust, mialaid their address~ 

Saturday ntaht, April 23rd, tOO Folger Sbakeapeare Library ilJ 

eelebrati.rJ& their b~ with a lecture by Jl!lrcette Chute whose 

pproved for Release by NSA on 06-18-2014 pursuant to E.O. 

3526 
.. , .... 

REF ID:A62823 

Dalrl!J, ~course,, 7ou reco.snize .. the author~ •Sbakeapeare ar Lcm&>n .. u 

1J.'be l'olpr bu ldDclly extended to me the privilege o'l 1m'1t1.Dg trieDda .. ir 10\1. al"ft 1ntereated in cOJ.aiJJs up tor it, X ebaul4 be ve-q baPW• 

Inclt 

a/• 

81nee:re~, 

I 

' I 

I 

,_, 

' 

I 

I 

I 

' i 

{ 

~
r--------------------lliiiiiiiiiiiiiim;===~~------.. ~ 

lle4r Vincent! 

310 Second Streat, s.E. 

W$sb1llgton 31 X>. c. 

13 SepWnber 1954 

1l!hank; you -ror ~OU!' letter or 31 August,, 

lt appears that a letter I aent fOU rrom London or f'rom 

Sv1tz~lpd. to Oambridgt! ncrwer reached you tor in it I (1} 

aeknm1le"'-.,n-ed receipt ~ the c(Jf1'1 of »occa.ccio ~ a Amoroaa VisiOM 

a.ud ~d. you very much tor so wlcone a EittJ .. {2) I told 

you tb.e.t r.ttY" return to Waehingtan had to be pontponed. because 

t/1t 'W unanticipated trip I bod to ~ to the Continent. 

X 4tl hope 1ou:r lecture vent ~wry -weu and 1f any ot 

the :na.teria.1. I tent you 1-lped even •lightly, I':r.i glad. v 

lSQping tha.t this ~ee.cll.ea rou -while on your bolidq and 

that yw. al"e both enJoyirJg it no end, I am, 

hc:d'eeator x. lt9 Vil'lcent 

Corpus Chriati Collego Ca:rnbl'i~. England 

Sincerely, 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 01-15-2015 pursuantto E.O. 1352e 

___ .... _~= ..... ::._ ;o.,__ 

-.1 ..... ·-:-- f
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk August 24, 2011 

# Order

August 24, 2011

142438-9(65)

DELAINA PATTERSON, as Personal Representative for the Esta te of Sherrill Turner, Deceased, and Robert Turne r, a Minor, Individually, by his Next Friend, DELAINA PATTERSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 142438-9 v COA: 288375, 291287 Wayne CC: 08-111034-NO SHERRY NICHOLS, Defendant,

and

TERRI SUTTON, Defendant-Appellant.

_____________ _______________ _____________

On order of the Chief Jus tice, the motion by defendant -appellant for extension of the time for filing her brief and appendix is considered and it is granted.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 5.1

                                 June 15, 1999

Chittenden Corporation
Two Burlington Square
Burlington, Vermont 05401

     Re: Legality of Securities to be Registered Under Registration Statement
  on Form S-3

Ladies and Gentlemen:

   I am Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Chittenden
Corporation, a Vermont corporation (the "Company"), and have represented the
Company in connection with a Registration Statement (the "Registration
Statement") on Form S-3 which was filed by the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, and which registers up to 500,000 shares of common
stock, par value $1.00 per share (the "Common Stock"), of the Company (the
"Shares") to be issued in connection with the Company's Dividend Reinvestment
and Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan").

   In that capacity, I have reviewed the amended and restated articles of
incorporation and by-laws of the Company, the Registration Statement,
including the exhibits thereto, the corporate proceedings taken by the Board
of Directors relating to the authorization of the issuance of the Shares, and
such other certificates and documents as I have deemed necessary or advisable
for the issuance of this opinion.

   Based upon the foregoing, I am of the opinion that when the Shares have
been issued and the Company has received full payment for the Shares therefor
in accordance with the terms of the Plan, such shares will be validly issued,
fully paid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock.

   The opinion expressed in this letter is limited to the matters set forth
herein, and no other opinions should be inferred beyond the matters expressly
stated. I consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement and to the reference to me and to my opinion in the
Registration Statement and the prospectus which is a part thereof.

                                          Very truly yours,

                                          /s/ F. Sheldon Prentice
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          F.SHELDON PRENTICE, ESQ.
                                          Senior Vice President, General
                                           Counsel and
                                          Secretary
EXHIBIT 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Creative Technology Ltd.
(the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Ng Keh Long, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Ng Keh LongNg Keh LongChief Financial OfficerDate: November 19, 2003
COPY/ RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD 

WASHING'ION 25, D. C. 

24 July 1951 

Major General Ralph J. Canine, USA 

Director, Armed Forces Security Agency 

3Sol Nebraska Ave., N.W. 

Washington, D. C. 

Dear General Canine: 

I want to extend to you my sincere wishes for success 

in your new assignment as Director of the Armed Forces Security Agency. You may be assured o£ the continuing support of the 

Research and Development Board and of my own personal interest 

in helping to make a success of the Armed Forces Security 

Agency activities. ~ :Jl 1o-SI' 

In his letter of 14 July 1956dmiral Stone invited me 

to participate as a member of the Special Cryptologic Advisory Group a.ni made certain other recommendations relative 

to research and development under the Armed Forces Security 

Agency. I am,, therefore, addressing my reply to you in order 

to express my appreciation for the opportunity to serve as 

a member of the Special Cryptologic Advisory Group. I have 

followed the activities of this group with considerable interest and feel that it is in a position to make a valuable 

contribution to the solution of important cryptologic research and development problems. 

I have referred to Mr. Walter G. Whitman, who will soon 

occupy my position as Chairman of the Research and Developnent 

Board, the suggestions made by Admiral Stone that a Board of 

Visitors be established for the purpose of reviewing the general aspects of the Armed Forces Security Agency's effort 

and "that Admiral Redman and Dr. Bush be included as members 

of the Special Cryptologic Advisory Group. You undoubtedly have ideas on these subjects, and I am sure that Mr. Whitman 

will want to discuss these matters with you personally. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ Wm Webster 

This document oonta1ns iutormation Wil.LIAM: WEBSTER tf'aotiug the national defense of Chairman 

he United States within th 

ng ot the Espici•a,._.. L 8 mean- eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-15-2014 ~ t:.>e aws, Title 18. ursuantto E.O. 13526 

.s.c., Seotions 7~S and 794. Xhe """'""""'""'"',;;;,;,,;;;..-.....,;;;;;;,;,,---.,;,,,,m,,,;.....,.~~~~~~~-C-O~P-Y~~~~ 

ransmission or the revelation ot 

ts contents in any manner to an 

Y ~i:-:rized person is prohibited RESTRICTED
Opinion issued November 10, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00733-CV

———————————

SCOTT D. LEVY & ASSOCIATES, P.C. AND SCOTT D. LEVY, Appellants

V.

CORINTHIAN COLLEGES, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2014-00570

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, Scott D. Levy & Associates, P.C. and Scott D. Levy, filed their 

notice of appeal seeking review of the August 29, 2014 oral ruling made by the trial 

court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 24.4(a). The trial court had ordered appellants to post a 

$950,000.00 supersedeas bond within ten days to stay execution of the foreign 
2

judgment while the underlying foreign case was on appeal in the U.S. Court of 

Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. This ruling was memorialized in a written order 

signed by the trial court on October 9, 2014, denying appellants’ motion to stay

suit/plea in abatement, which was filed as part of a supplemental clerk’s record in 

this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 27.2, 27.3.

On June 26, 2015, this appeal was stayed pursuant to the notice of bankruptcy 

filing by the appellee, Corinthian Colleges, Inc. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2; see also 11 

U.S.C. § 362(a)(1) (West 2010). On August 23, 2016, the district clerk filed a second 

supplemental clerk’s record in this Court, attaching the trial court’s order, signed on 

June 21, 2016, dismissing the underlying lawsuit with prejudice based on the Ninth 

Circuit’s June 9, 2016 reversal of the foreign judgment.

On August 30, 2016, because it appeared that this appeal may be moot, this

Court’s order and notice of intent to dismiss for want of jurisdiction reinstated this 

appeal and notified appellant that this appeal was subject to dismissal for want of 

jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), (c). Appellant failed to timely respond.

This Court generally has jurisdiction only over appeals from final judgments 

unless a statute authorizes an interlocutory appeal. See TEX.CIV.PRAC.&REM.CODE 

ANN. §§ 51.012, 51.014(a)(1)–(12) (West Supp. 2016) (listing appealable 

interlocutory orders); CMH Homes v. Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444, 447 (Tex. 2011)

(“Unless a statute authorizes an interlocutory appeal, appellate courts generally only 
3

have jurisdiction over appeals from final judgments.”). After the trial court’s June 

21, 2016 order dismissed the underlying trial court case with prejudice, that rendered 

this appeal moot and, thus, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See, e.g., Gen. 

Land Office of State of Tex. v. OXY U.S.A., Inc., 789 S.W.2d 569, 571 (Tex. 1990) 

(“As a consequence of the trial court’s granting the nonsuit, the temporary injunction 

ceased to exist and the appeal became moot.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX.R. APP.

P. 42.3(a); 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Huddle.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-60455

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Ronnie Thomas, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:21-CR-15-1

______________________________

Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:

*

Defendant-Appellant Ronnie Thomas pleaded guilty to one count of 

distribution of cocaine and was sentenced as a career offender to 151 months 

in prison, the bottom of the guidelines range. On appeal, he challenges the 

substantive reasonableness of his sentence. Thomas contends that his 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 14, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-60455 Document: 00516676815 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/14/2023
No. 22-60455

2

sentence is substantively unreasonable because the district court afforded 

insufficient credit to mitigating factors that he specifies. We AFFIRM.

We review the substantive reasonableness of a district court’s 

sentence for abuse of discretion. We give great deference to the sentence 

imposed by the district court and its weighing of the sentencing factors. 

United States v. Simpson, 796 F.3d 548, 557 (5th Cir. 2015). Because 

Thomas’s sentence was within the guideline range, it is presumed to be 

reasonable. See id. He can only rebut this presumption “by demonstrating 

that the sentence: (1) does not account for a factor that should have received 

significant weight, (2) gives significant weight to an irrelevant or improper 

factor, or (3) represents a clear error of judgment in balancing the sentencing 

factors.” Id. at 558 (internal quotations omitted). 

We have reviewed the record and conclude that Thomas has failed to 

rebut the presumption of reasonableness. The district court considered

Thomas’s and the Government’s contentions and concluded that a sentence 

at the bottom of the range was appropriate. Further, Thomas’s disagreement 

with the policy of the career-offender provision of the U.S. Sentencing

Guidelines is not sufficient to make his sentence unreasonable. See United 

States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 357, 356–67 (5th Cir. 2009).

We AFFIRM.

Case: 22-60455 Document: 00516676815 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/14/2023
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1783 

To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 to clarify 

a provision relating to the designation of a northern transportation 

route in Washington County, Utah. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 15, 2015 

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 

2009 to clarify a provision relating to the designation 

of a northern transportation route in Washington County, Utah. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WASHINGTON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE TRAV4 EL AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN. 

5 Section 1977(b)(2) of the Omnibus Public Land 

6 Management Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–11; 123 Stat. 

7 1089) is amended by striking subparagraph (A) and in8 serting the following: 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1783 IS

1 ‘‘(A) ensure that the travel management 

2 plan— 

3 ‘‘(i) designates a northern transpor4 tation route in the County that follows the 

5 route depicted on the map entitled ‘Wash6 ington Parkway’; and 

7 ‘‘(ii) provides that the designation and 

8 construction of the route is not subject to 

9 additional restrictions or requirements 

10 from the United States Fish and Wildlife 

11 Service;’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS