alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 7183

DEREK ANTOINE SMITH,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

v.
ERIK A. HOOKS,
Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. ( 3:19

- cv

- 00291

- MR )

Submitted : September 22, 2021 Decided: October 6, 2021

Before WILKINSON, HARRIS, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Derek Antoine Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Derek Antoine Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his

28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. * The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge
issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of

appealabil ity will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional
right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a
prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.

Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural
grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive proce dural ruling is
debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional

right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000))

. Limiting our review of the record to the issues raised in Smith ’s informal brief and
supplemental informal brief s , we conclude that Smith has not made the requisite showing.

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) ( “ The

informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited

* We previously remanded this case to the district court for the limited purpose of enabling the court to determine whether Smith had shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the time to appeal. See Smith v. Hooks
, 838 F. App ’ x 787 ( 4th Cir. 20 21 ) (No. 20

- 7183 ). On remand, the district court granted Smith an extension of time to file a notice of appeal and deemed his notice of appeal timely filed.3 to issues preserved in that brief. ” )

. Accordingly, we deny Smith’s motion for a certificate
of appealability and dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the f acts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
* P ursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 97-50322 Summary Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NAKUNDA LATRICE BLUE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

(W-96-CA-410)

_________________________________________________________________
October 16, 1998

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Nakunda Latrice Blue, who pleaded guilty to possession with

intent to distribute cocaine, appeals the denial of her 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 motion. Our court granted Blue a certificate of

appealability limited to whether her § 2255 motion was time-bared;

and whether she received ineffective assistance of counsel because

her attorney failed to assert that she was entitled to an

additional two-level reduction in her base offense level pursuant

to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(4) (now 2D1.1(b)(6)) and failed to correct- 2 -

the district court’s mistaken impression that it did not have the

discretion to depart downward.

Blue’s § 2255 motion was not time-barred. See United States

v. Flores

, 135 F.3d 1000, 1002-06 (5th Cir. 1998). She has not

shown, however, that her attorney’s performance was defic i ent

because he failed to assert the applicability of a gu ideline

provision that had not yet become effective or, as claimed for the

first time on appeal (which we review only for plain error),

because he failed to request a continuance pending the enactment of

that provision. S ee United States v. Flores-Ochoa

, 139 F.3d 1022,

1024 (5th Cir .), cert. denied , ___ U.S. ___, 118 S. Ct. 2383

(1998). In addition, the record does not support Blue’s assertion

that the district court mistakenly believed that it did not have

the discretio n to depart downward. Accordingly, she has not

demonstrated that her attorney rendered ineffective assistance by

failing to correct the purported mistaken impression. S ee United

States v. McKinney

, 53 F.3d 664, 677 (5th Cir.), cert. denied

, 516

U.S. 901 (1995).

AFFIRMED
... ; . 

LOG 

Attn1 Mr. McFadden 

... ... ... ... ,. . ~· ••' 

REF ID:A64256 

SE:CRElJ 

8/NJS'l. 

Mr. Frie=an 

3 DeceJJ1ber 54 

6o493/can 

It '• remtested that m:oo11rt11mnt action on thel I IDB1 

aubmit their reqUirementa to permit the •ubmi••ion o-r a consolidated order 

trom 1'SA. EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

WILLIAM F" FRIEIJWf 

Special .beiatant 

__ Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 01-15-2015 pursuantto E .0. 13526=~-~~­

BECRElJ
- -------- -- ---------------------------- -REF ID:A64036 

Mrs • M. l!. MacI<'s.y 

Alei•tut to the Editor in 

Charge or Bditori&l Production 

Xncyclo:piedia Britannica 

425 Borth Michigan Avenue 

Chicago ll,. Illinois 

Dear Mra. MacICay1 

17 December J.954 

I return herewith the prints ot the two new illustrations which 

vill accomxaey UJ3' artic1e CODES AID CIPHERS. 

The print ar Fig. 9 require• a amll correction which I have 

indicated tl:J.Qreons the letters 7 and E ahould be interchanged. in 

:position on the lat wheel only. However, I think it would improve 

the picture to add the letters I •hov on the two tapes 1n the print. 

'?hese 1etters would make clear to the reader that on one tape the 

machine prints the plain text,i on the other tape, the cipher text,. 

I hope this addition v111 not cause too mu.ch troubleJ 1:t 1t does, 

just torge~ it.* 

As regards Pig .. 12, the print is quite correct, but here again, 

if' the letters I have added can be shown on the tapes, the picture 

would be improved. 

lncls: 

a/• 

Sincerely, 

WILLIAM F. J'RDDWI 

* The letters. I have ehown on tlie print are aupposed to represent the 

plain text words THR QU.CK and the equivalent cipher text !CPBZI ... me. 

The letter Z here enciphers the apace between the word.BJ the e:pace beyond 

the I in the cipher indicates that the cipher text ia automatically 

grouped in 5'•J the dote 1n this explam.tion repreeen~ letters which 

are hidden Ul:lder the cutting bar. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-09-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
<PAGE>
 
February 1, 1999

SECPS Letter File
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Mail Stop 9-5
450 Fifth Street, Northwest
Washington, DC 20549

RE: Advanced Lumitech  Inc. - SEC File No. 33-55254-27


Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have read Item 4 of the 8-K dated January 27, 1999  for Advanced Lumitech
Inc. and agree with the statements contained therein.


Very truly yours,


Smith & Company


By: /s/ William R. Denney
    ---------------------
    William R. Denney
Easyinternet Co., Ltd. Order Sheet



 Exhibit 10.15 
 

 
  
 Order Sheet

 e-SMART KOREA INC. 
 TEL. FAX. August 20, 2008 
 Orderer Taxpayer Identification Number Name of Company Easyinternet Co.,
Ltd. Name of Representative Dong-Ki Yoo 
 Address 212-1 Ace Twin Tower 1-cha,Rm # 510, Guro-gu, Guro-Dong, Seoul, Korea

 Type of Business Value-added communication, computers Items of Business 
 Supplier e-Smart Korea, Inc. 
 Address 642-9 Yeoksam-Dong, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul 
 TEL. 02-2185-5887 
 FAX. 02-2185-5889 
 Price : FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND WON (KRW 400,000) / VAT not included 
 NO Name of Product Specification Unit
Quantity Unit Price Price 
 1 I AM Card Contact Type EA 20 20,000 400,000 
 Total 400,000 
 Reference : 1. Date of Delivery : Negotiable 2. Terms of Payment: Cash 
 1/1 







 

 
  
 e-Smart Korea

 E-SMART KOREA INC. 642-9, Songchon B/D 9F Yeoksam-dong 
 TEL +822.2185.5886~8 FAX. +822.2185.5889 Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea 
 DELIVERY RECEIPT 
 To: e-Smart Korea Inc. 
 Name of Product Specification Unit Quantity Remarks 
 I AM CARD Contact Type EA 20 
 The above products have been duly received. 
 September 2, 2008 
 Name of Company : Easyinternet Co., Ltd. 
 Department: Business Management 
 Name: Kwang-Ui Son 
 http://www.esmartkorea.com
Lowry, Nick (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Dear Mr. Silberberg: 

Lowry, Nick (OST) 

Tuesday, April16, 2013 1:57 PM 

Robert P. Silverberg (rsilverberg@sgbdc.com); Don Hainbach (dhaiiibach@;gghL ,,,,:, 

airlaw.com); Mike Borsetti (mike@borsetti.com) , , 

Podberesky, Samuel (OST); Graber, Kimberly (OST); Gorman>R.obe'r((OST); A/sha'a3 2 

Amna (OST) 

Your letter of April.l1,_2.QI -- Documents filed by Mike Borsetti in DOT OST 

2013-0024 ani2013-002 

This is in response to your letter of Aprilll, 2013, in which you state that three documents filed in Dkt OST 2013-0024 

by Mike Borsetti are documents unauthorized by the Department's procedural rules (14 CFR Part 302) and should not b-e 

accepted for filing. 

)The documents are entitled: (1) "Comr'aint and Motion tc' Join Complaint," April 5, 2013; (2) "Corrnents in Support of 

',DOT Investigation into American Airline.:}'' March21, 2013;,::and "Comments in Support ofDOT lnve:;tigation into 

American Airlines, Inc., and British Airways Pic and Request for Joint Investigation of Immunized lntl'!grated Joint Venture 

, Partners," March 21, 2013. 

While you are correct in pointing out the pleadings are not explicitly allowed under the Department' rules, we at the 

Enforcement Office have decided that we will accept them along with comments filed by members of the public in a 

related docket (DOT OST 2013-0025) in the interest of receptiveness to public comment and participation. We will 

accord them informal consideration in our review of the two dockets. As you point out, under rule 6(c)(3) the 

Department must consider matters contained in these documents as controverted and American need not answer the 

filings. 

I will place a copy of this e-mail in Dockets OST 2013-0024 and 2013-0025. 

Nicholas Lowry 

Senior Attorney 

Office of Aviation Enforcement & Proceedings 

Office of the General Counsel 

U.S. Dept. ofTransportation 

202-366-9351 (ph) 

1
REF ID:A43718 

PL86-36/50 USC 3605 

EO 3;3 (h) (2) 

MIMOPA1'IQI J'OR TBi DXRIC'r<ll OP treFJmS1 ~ ABD BIGIHEEPDO 

sua.JICl': ~ :t• ~ J\mda (U) 

N 1.2r J 

2 0 APR 1961 

i. n s.a requeated ~ n-61 ~ tllDda tn the ~ ot 

$4.1 af.UJ.on 'be -4e aftrtlable to ·= a ~ a14 - .,......... 

I _ -1~- pronslan. i.o '"8D -4e in 'the HM N l or n<a RJ7lU Budget. to 

t1nance tb1a p~ 

a. PreMntl7,, th1e caiibtned effOl"t 1e ftnaDoed through, the appllca"ioa ot MWJ.lP tunda un4er tbe d1l'ect.1on ot the ott'1ee ot Fore1gn ~. 

It ta pl""'1'\9'i to utiliae tbe ~ t\mda to ecaUme this deftlat• ant 

p1"Gg1-1n accorduce v:lth tbe ~ r11ebed b9'tVeeD the u. s. and 

....._ __ ___,_____.trhe f'mlda, the.rerore, mat be ..Ua'ble nov t.o 1neun ccmttnuanoe ot tbS.a ~ etton. 

Ccrpy F\U."n18hed.: 

L. H. tl'RQl'r 

VS.ce AdJd.NJ., UBI' 

Dlrecrtor 

Oeaeral G. B. Ensld.ne, t.JllC·ne\~ 

A.eat to SecDe1', Sp (llu 

cc : DIR --:.E ·-'f'r 

AG 

Reading File 

OPS 

COMP 

LOG 

R/D Reading File 

R/D-02 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 10-09-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
REF ID:A43718 

Serial.: N 1251 

a. J. Bronder, R/~, 1'6ao1 20 Apr 61/I bns 

~L 86-36/50 USC 3605 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 )
.FSCS3/F.X/M(1) DRAFT 

002 

-~~TIOf~ SF.CURIT? CONFERENCE, 1953 

--....,MlriUt ......... --.-e-s-o .... r ...... the ?irst. Meeting <>f"the Conte.ranee 

held at 1100 hours, S June 195.3 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

Present PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Chairmans Mr. W1ll1amF. Friedman 

U.K .. IJel,egatee U1S, DeJ,wt.p 

17) 

Mr. V, P, Keq 

Mr. Frank ROwlett 

Mr. William H. Godel 

Mr. ii. F. /Packard 

Capt. G. Grange,. USN 

Col. M. L. Sherburn,, USA 

Lt.. Col./ John M, Anderson, USAF 

Lt. K. /B. MolJTP81>1, Jr., USN (secretary) 

1.. The Chairman proposed that at thie meeting the delegatee consider onJ.¥ the procedure or the conference and reassemble alt.er the 

Chai:rman'a luncheon at l.400. He suggened that the work ot the conferenca continue until 1700 and that the delegates meet at 0900 on 

Saturday moming. It was so agreed. 

2o At tho request of the Chairman, I I outlined to the 

delegates hie idf:fas as to tha conduct of the work or the conference. 

He stated that th6 problem seemed to tall into two sections: 

a. Intelligence and securlty aspects. 

b. Technical and cryptologic aspects. 

He proposed that two subcommittees be appointed to t alee under conoideration each or the above. It waa /so agreed and the followi.ng subooamitteea 

were appointed by the two heads/ of delegations: 

Form 781-Cl3S 

SubcO!llllittee l - To consider the intelligence~ ph1'81cal 

and/personnel security aspects or the 

problems before the Conference. 

y .s. :.tembers 

Mr. V. P. Keay 

Hr. Frank Rowlett 

Mr. ft. F. Packard 

Col. H .• L. Sherburn 

Lt. Col. Jc;>.'m H. Anderson 

Mr. Wil..lla.m H. Godel. 

(Secretary) Cdr. W. L. Thomas (Technical Advieor) 

l 

TOP SECRET CI\NOE 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-28-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
FSCSJ/EX/H(l) DRAFT 

002 

Subconmlttee 2 - To conaider technical and cr;rptolog1o 

aepects or the problems before the 

Conference. 

U,S. Malllbere 

Mr. W. F. Friedman 

Capt. G. Grange 

Eb 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Mr. F. A. Raven (Teohnioal A.4Vieor) 

(Secreta.r;r) Mr. F. c. Austin (Teohnical/Advisor) 

F..xecutive Conmittee - To receive and act upon reports or 

the Subcommittees and to resolve 

differences which might arise in 

Subconmittees. 

U. S, Members 

Mr. W. F. Friedman (Chairman) 

Mr. William H. Godel 

Lt., K. B. Moeypeny, Jr., USN (Secretary) 

Mr. Priedman stated that he wished to l{eep O"Den the question 0£ additional 

.membcrnhip or. the ..;.1.ecutiv'G Cootaittee. 

J. Th• Chairman then placed before the i;::"'tj" the conclusl.one 

and re~mmendations of the 1951 conference on security and 

eaeh. ot the items was aesigned to one or the o . o the subcommittees 

for rev4..elti: 

Subcoimd.ttee l 

Para. Je 

3g 

Jh 

3i(l) 

Jk 

.31 

Executive Comnittoo. 

Para. .3b 

Subcomd.ttee 2 

Para .. Ja 

3c 

Jd 

)G 

31(2) 

31(4) 

.3j 

31 

[::onferenca as a. whole 

Para. 3r 

.31(3) 

3m 

Jn 

4. There was no further business to come before the meeting. 

·rhe ma~in8 adjourned at 1200 \dth the underetaniing that at 1400 the 

above appointed Subco:runittees would meet and independently camnence 

work .. 

2 

Form 781-ClJS TOP SECRET CANOE
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of US Energy Systems Inc (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Lawrence I. Schneider
-------------------------
Lawrence I. Schneider                                        Dated: May 23, 2005
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)




/s/Richard J. Augustine                                       Dated May 23, 2005
-----------------------
Richard J. Augustine
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
.\RT!€'^!TQr, 

r ^ K 

P.O. Box2138 . J 0;"rRAT10MS 

Wrangttll.AK 99929 

907-874-3110 -.- U P I?.- 0*1 

The Honorable Ray LaHood, Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington. O.C 20590 

Rav.lahood|g)dotjtov 

January 19,2011 

Re: Continuation of Alaska Airllnct^ EKim^af Air S^nrfca at Cordova. Gurtavus. 

Dear Secretarv LaHood, 

We strongly support the selection of Alaska Airlines to continue to provide essential air 

service to our communitv< Alaska Airlines' service meets crucial needs that would be 

difficult if not Impossible, to meet with any other r/pe of service or aircraft type. 

Alaska AletJnet'fet service is critk ^ to the economic well being of our community. 

In the seafood Industry, Alaska Alrfines' service is a critical component to accessing Kve 

end fresh markets to the industry, live and fresh seafood is considered a premium 

quality and demands a higher price, thus allowing those in the Industry to gain the fufi 

economic benefit from the seafood resources In this region, fiosfc tnfnstntcture such 

as thh is a key to unloddng economic devehpment and growth in our eommunftSes. 

For these reasons, we respectfully urge OOT to select Alaska Airlines to continue to 

provide easoftial air service to Southeast Alaska, as the airline has successfully done for 

more than thirty years. 

Slnttr«/y, 

C-XA 

6lg&Ji 

Cammercla! ffshfng family & direct marketers 

cc Wrangeil Chamber of Commerce 

Southeast Conference
. - ----~-~~------

Mr. Jtotiert ! . Miller 

$KXXl !f, t\jll.and. Street 

Ar~, Virglnia 

Dear Bobt 

! &1:11 J:llUCh pleued Vi th YO\U' acceptance Gr Qe:oertiJ. Clan 1M • • 

invitation to be a .mber at the Tel.ecomnnnieationa h.oel ~ tM 

la.tioaal Se curl ty As,enC"J Scientitie Ad.vif}Or.)' Joe.rd. 

nie next meottna or the M.vuacy Joar4 1.tsell' probably vill 

lMt lli!ltld. on ~-2l April. At tbu.t ti..me it ia expected. a report on 

the Ja.nel -.aibel'ahtp will 'be tubm:tted. to tM lSoe.rd ~ether with 

f<mlC pro'blems that ca.n be ~tured tor -.ied .tic panel action. 

lu'bse~nt to thia Joe.rd. .eetJ..na, tho panel chail'11w:n1 who are 

...i.o :wed:>era ot the lloo.rd,, will w able to contu Yith you an 

•tttt. o:t panel orpniu.tion e.=4 tu+.ure activities. 

I vuh to thank you tar yr:111r rM.d.;y acceptance ot the 1nvttat1on, •!nee it a tod!cative ot your cont.inuitl,$ interest in our 

problema. 

cc: AG 

C/8 

S/ASST (Mr. Friedman) 

M/Rt Acknowledgroont of Mr. Miller's J.tr dtd l2 Feb 54. Mr. Miller 

accepts Gen.Ca.nine's invitation to be a member on the Telecommunications 

Panel. of' the NS.AB.AB. 

M.M.Fe1ersk.i/S/ABST/&JJ+93/19Feb 54 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-24-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
SEC Form 10Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         230,876
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,112,602
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    628,140
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,132,526
<PP&E>                                       5,422,298
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,652,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,961,013
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,824,691
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        12,196
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,457,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,961,013
<SALES>                                      4,692,260
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,708,753
<CGS>                                        3,410,861
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,689,680
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              97,352
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (78,279)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (78,279)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (78,279)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
' , ... REF -ID :A65873--· 

Dr. H. P. Robertson 

Direct.or or Rese~l~• WSEG 

-0-l'!ice of the Sec_retary or Defense 

The Pentagon 

Washington 25, D. C. 

Dear Bob: 

- Thank you for l"etu.rning the .rour reports we checked out 

to you l.ast f'al1. I am. returning herewith your receipt tor 

the documents. 1·-- --

I am very sorry you are leaving this area and sh.a.ll. miss 

you. But I have real hopes that ve will get together again 

in the not too distant .ruture, when the new SCAG is established. 

With cordial regards to all the Robertsons,. I am. 

1 Incl 

Receipt 

· Sincerely, 

- WILLIAM F. FRIEDMAN 

Consultant 

W.F.Friedman/eby/23 June 52 

Consultant 

eclassifi ed and a roved for release b NSA on 09-16-2014 ursuantto E .0. 1352 

. 

-
~ I 

~-----M-•1•1•n•:111x•t•s•n•1•1• 

- - SECREi Hiftm lfi@1·1AtUi!AI •• 

Dear Bill: 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 

WEAPONS SYSTEMS EVALUATION GROUP 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

.. 

J. 7 June 1952 

I am returning herewith the four reports which 

you lent me last fall. These have been very illuminating ind~ed and I only regret that lack of time has kept me f~~m going further into the subject. 

As you know, I am leaving here the first of the 

month, but hope that I will still have occasion to see 

you here or in Californ~a. 

Dr. William F. Friedman 

Department of Defense 

·. 

Armed Forces Security Agency Washington 25, D. c. 

4 Encl. 

·very sincerely yours, .. 

:. 

H. P. ROBERTSON 

. · 

·. 

:). 

... 

~-1 

-.. 

;. 

~ ...t. 

.. 

"' 

'· 

filo r - .,,. 

·-

,\ 

·. 

. . 

4f - . '• ·!' . ~ . 

-$lEfSiij~~~1FY .. I ~ ~OOflffiffMf{~i~'.~~ I 0 ~--·· .-: ..
---~~--- ----;-_-

SECRET -eG-n~~;~re: ~' kll1elttn rar 'llnigat~~ lid Int'or.wa.t.ion 

?O: MellbGr8 or EA FiiJ'..{I 

Class'! f1eat1an 

.id.'f1sory Panol 1 (In t.nril} 

Cal,. Caapbel.11 .lQ 

Col., 'W'yXU.11 SPU 

Mr. Ot'~ket"J• C/srt; 

lll"'11 C~~# T!TJ 

;fl<, hied:mn, rJ./l.SST 

WIUJ:Ai, 1. F'fm:rt'A» 

Cba1r.:ian 

IBl Cla::m t'i.CAti ® Adrt&or.1 Panel 

~ 

Declassified and a9groved for release by NSA on 06-20-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

- *--•·----I - - ---~-

-~ 

- ~--