alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 40 (Monday, March 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 11189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04240]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR15-17-000]


Marathon Pipe Line LLC; Notice of Petition for Declaratory Order

    Take notice that on February 18, 2015, pursuant to Rule 207(a)(2) 
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.207(a)(2) (2014), Marathon Pipe Line 
LLC filed a petition for a declaratory order approving priority service 
and the overall rate structure and terms of service for an expansion of 
its crude oil pipeline from Patoka, Illinois to Lima, Ohio, all as more 
fully explained in the petition.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Petitioner.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3a7c7f687975545653545f694f4a4a55484e7a5c5f4859145d554c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0d4b485f4e4263616463685e787d7d627f794d6b687f6e236a627b">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on March 18, 2015.

    Dated: February 24, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-04240 Filed 2-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
From: Richard Krock <rkrock@vinylinfo.org>

To: Jodi Howard/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Mary Bachynsky <mbachynsky@fpcusa.com>, Mark Garza 

<mgarza@shin-tech.com>, James Bell <jbell@shin-tech.com>, "Kevin Bloomer

(kbloomer@westlake.com)" <kbloomer@westlake.com>, "'Sistrunk, 

Otis J. (PED)'" <Otis.Sistrunk@polyone.com>,

"Barry_H._Christensen@oxy.com" <Barry_H._Christensen@oxy.com>, 

JC Walker <walker@khlaw.com>

Date: 10/30/2009 11:51 AM

Subject: PVC MACT Survey Questions from VI Members

Dear Ms. Howard,

The attached file contains our second set of questions that The Vinyl

Institute members have compiled in order to clarify some of the

information requested in the subject survey. Please review the

questions and return your responses to those copied on this e-mail. If

you post the answers at a designated EPA portal, please forward the

pathway to us. Your quick clarification to our questions is appreciated

so that those compiling the significant amount of data can successfully

complete the preparation of the survey for the quickly approaching

November 30, 2009 deadline. Please do not hesitate to contact me with

any questions or comments. Thank you.

*Please note our new contact information*

Richard Krock

Technical Director

The Vinyl Institute

1737 King Street Suite 390

Alexandria, VA 22314

Direct: 571.970.3392

Mobile: 571.216.4474

Fax: 571.970.3271

Email: rkrock@vinylinfo.org

http://www.vinylinfo.org

http://www.vinylindesign.com

(See attached file: VI PVC MACT Survey Questions Rollup as of

10-30-09.doc)(Embedded image moved to file: pic18281.jpg)VI Logo
#### Van Roy, Respondent, vs. Watermolen, Appellant.

*May 4*

June *23, 1905.*

*Highways: Trespass: Abutting owners.*

1. Plaintiff liad a private ditch running from Ms close to connect-with a ditch, in the highway in front of his premises. Defendant caused his cattle to he driven to the highway ditch for the purpose of drinking, and they trampled down the banks of the ditch and destroyed the outlet of plaintiff’s private ditch so as to prevent the free flow of water therein, which caused water to back up onto plaintiff’s, premises. *Held,*that defendant’s act was a technical trespass, since it was not the use of the highway for travel, nor a mere incidental turning aside of the cattle to drink as they were being rightfully driven along the highway.

2. Such acts are not authorized by sec. 1347c, Stats. 1898 (providing that the general public shall have the right to use and take the water from any spring, creek, or running water that may be-found running in or across the limits of any highway).

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Brown, county: Samuel D. Hastings, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*334For tbe appellant there was a brief by *Sheridan &*Evans, and oral argument by *F. D. Merrill.*

*V. I. Minaban,*for tbe respondent.

WiNsnow, J.

Tbis was an action of trespass to real estate commenced in justice court and brought by appeal to tbe circuit court. It appeared that there was a ditch in tbe highway in front of the plaintiff’s premises and upon his side of the highway in which water ran during wet weather, and that'' a private ditch ran from plaintiff’s close into this highway ditch; that the defendant caused his cattle, several in number, to be driven to the highway ditch for the purpose of drinking, and that they trampled down the banks of the ditch, causing the water to spread out, and disturbed the outlet of plaintiff’s private ditch so as to prevent the free flow of water therein and cause it to back up onto plaintiff’s premises to some extent. This was held to be 'a technical trespass, and rightly so. This was not the use of the highway for travel, .nor was it a mere incidental turning aside of the cattle to drink as they were being rightfully driven along the highway. Had they been driven to the plaintiff’s side of the highway to graze thereon there could be no doubt that the act would be a trespass; and no difference in principle can be pointed out when they were driven there to drink instead of to graze. Sec. 1347 c, Stats. 1898, does not touch the question here presented. There is no other question in the case which merits consideration or treatment.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

                              KINDER MORGAN ENERGY
                                 PARTNERS, L.P.

Kinder Morgan Canada Company
Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline GP, Inc.
KM Texas Pipeline, L.P.
Kinder Morgan North Texas Pipeline, L.P.
Kinder Morgan Texas Gas Services LLC
Kinder Morgan Transmix Company, LLC
Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC
Kinder Morgan Trailblazer, LLC
CGT Trailblazer, LLC
Kinder Morgan NGL, L.P.
Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, L.P.
MidTex Gas Storage Company, LLP
Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "A"
Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "B"
Kinder Morgan CO2 Company, L.P.
Trailblazer Pipeline Company
Kinder Morgan Bulk Terminals, Inc.
Western Plant Services, Inc.
Dakota Bulk Terminal, Inc.
Delta Terminals Services LLC
HBM River Plant, Inc.
River Consulting, Inc.
Milwaukee Bulk Terminals, Inc.
Queen City Terminals, Inc.
Kinder Morgan Port Terminals USA LLC
Elizabeth River Terminals LLC
Nassau Terminals LLC
Fernandina Marine Construction Management LLC
Kinder Morgan Port Manatee Terminal LLC
Kinder Morgan Port Sutton Terminal LLC
Pinney Dock & Transport LLC
Trimark Engineers/Contractors, Inc.
Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "C"
Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "D"
SFPP, L.P.
Kinder Morgan Liquids Terminals LLC
Kinder Morgan Pipeline LLC
Kinder Morgan Tank Storage Terminals LLC
Central Florida Pipeline LLC
Calnev Pipe Line LLC
Kinder Morgan Las Vegas LLC
Globalplex Partners, Joint Venture
Colton Processing Facility
Laser Materials Services, LLC
REF ID:A68791 

- ~- -- --------------·------

,;;, 4-

.Y) 

S"/o 

___ _5_7 

·--- ~-i __ _ 

---

- r~ -

.::r6 

. _s-7 

-5i 

14 s +J1 1~u~~-~--~- __ . 1~s-y. ~ 

J( ~ --9-CZi . - --

_) f_rf X 

..::> --::> ' 

5t 

SI 

·-i .-~--'--- ~ 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-11-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

----- ---
# CE2004084EN.01069401.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/694 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/694

---

(2004/C 84 E/0779)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0885/04

byPaulo Casaca (PSE) to the Commission

(22 March 2004)

Subject:   List of deep-sea, pelagic and demersal fish species

Subject:

Will the Commission provide an exhaustive list, indicating scientific names and common designations, of all species classified as:

| — | deep-water species (designation used in Regulation (EC) No 2027/95 (1)), deep-sea species (designation used in Regulation (EC) No 2347/2002 (2)) and deepwater fish (designation used in Regulation (EC) No 1639/2001 (3)); |
| --- | --- |

—

deep-water species (designation used in Regulation (EC) No 2027/95 (1)), deep-sea species (designation used in Regulation (EC) No 2347/2002 (2)) and deepwater fish (designation used in Regulation (EC) No 1639/2001 (3));

1

2

3

| — | demersal species (designation used in Regulation (EC) No 2027/95) and non-deep-sea demersal species (designation used in Regulation (EC) No 1954/2003 (4)); |
| --- | --- |

—

demersal species (designation used in Regulation (EC) No 2027/95) and non-deep-sea demersal species (designation used in Regulation (EC) No 1954/2003 (4));

4

| — | pelagic species (designation used in Regulation (EC) No 1639/2001)? |
| --- | --- |

—

pelagic species (designation used in Regulation (EC) No 1639/2001)?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(26 April 2004)

(26 April 2004)

In view of the length of its answer, the Commission is sending it direct to the Honourable Member and to Parliament's Secretariat.

---

(1)  OJ L 199, 24.8.1995, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 351, 28.12.2002, p. 6.

2

(3)  OJ L 222, 17.8.2001, p. 53.

3

(4)  OJ L 289, 7.11.2003, p. 1.

4

---
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Revlon, Inc. (the"Company") for the period ended December 31,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Report"), I, Jack L. Stahl,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

/s/ Jack L.Stahl                 Jack L. StahlChiefExecutive OfficerApril 12, 2005

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND FOR THE THREE AND
NINE MONTH PERIODS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO 
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       4,123,366
<SECURITIES>                                 5,846,313
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,325,427
<ALLOWANCES>                                   811,000
<INVENTORY>                                  8,554,062
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,536,369
<PP&E>                                      20,097,409
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,911,290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              65,279,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,752,787
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,623
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,647,798
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                65,279,483
<SALES>                                     17,445,695
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,969,505
<CGS>                                        7,139,029
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,211,584
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               336,354
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             256,957
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,460,505)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   512,187
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,972,692)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,972,692)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.40)
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

**JUDGMENT**

No. 04-22-00401-CR

David **HINOJOSA**,

Appellant

v.

The **STATE** of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR0444

Honorable Jennifer Peña, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

	In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

	SIGNED January 10, 2024.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

# image1.png

# image2.jpeg
,l 

REF ID:A4158'1~ 

• • 

. . 

Dr. John w. ~ 

~nt ot Matm..t1ca 

Pr1nceton UniwnitY 

Pr1Dceton1 . »ev JeraQ' 

Dear Dr. Tukey: 

Serial: fl¥ 0 

. /,j-/-~ ,,~. 

I ail pleaaed With 70UI" acceptance ot the 1nv1tat1on to 

be a 1!llltll'ber ot the Matheatica Panel ot tbe !Gtional Security 

Agency Sc1entU1c Ad.visor;r Board. 

The next Meting ot the Adv:Lsoey Board. itself "1U 

probably be held on· 20-21 April 1954-~ At tbt.t. time it ia 

· expected that a report on tllo paaal ~hSp vill be aub• 

mitted to the Soard together "1th .aae proble• that can be 

reten:ed tor specific panel. act10u. Subaequent to this Beard 

rneetitl81 the panel ch&1"'8n, vllO are alao meaber• ot the Board; 

v1ll be a'ble to· eonter w1tb you on -.ttera of panel organization 

aDll Mure act1V1t1e•• 

I Vieh to tbaDk yot1 tor your ·~ accepta.nc:e ot 11\Y 1nv1ta.;. 

tion, •ince 1t 1a indicative or your J.nteroat· 1n and '¥a.Jr eattmte ~the 1aportance or the problna vith which ve m11t contend in 

the 1o:te:reat ot the ·m.,t1cmal defense. I am ~ .tC)nlO.rd to 

aeeiDg 7011. vben you are next in w .. hington. · 

cc: .AG . . . . c/s ;· · . s/ ASST (Mr. Friedman) _. 

RAIPB S. CMmiE 

Lieutenaat GeDeral, w km:! 

Director 

· M/R: AcJmowlefilgment of Dr. Tukey's ltr d.td 8 Feb. 54. Dr. Tukey. 

accepts Oen.CaDine's iDVitation far membership on the MatheDBtics 

·Panel of the NSASA:B. . 

\)~ 

M.M.Felereki, S/ASST/6o4tJ3/ll Feb 54 

11\ooroved for Release by NSA on 12-01-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
# CE2004088EN.01049201.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/492 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/492

---

(2004/C 88 E/0504)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0266/04

by John McCartin (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(4 February 2004)

Subject:   Imports of poultry meat into the EU

Subject:

Can the Commission state what quantities of poultry meat have been imported into the European Union in the most recent six-month period for which statistics are available, and whether a suspension of such imports would have any significant effect on the European market for meat?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(16 March 2004)

(16 March 2004)

During the first six months of 2003 the imports to the EU of poultrymeat (including live poultry and poultrymeat products) amounted to 411 000 tonnes (t). The level of imports was 26 % higher than in the corresponding period of 2002.

It is estimated that in 2003 imports of poultrymeat reached the level of 800 000 tonnes, an amount equivalent to 9 % of poultrymeat and 2 % of all meat consumed in the EU, respectively.

The main suppliers of poultrymeat to the EU in 2003 were Brazil (estimated 400 000 t), Thailand (estimated 190 000 t) and the countries of Central and Eastern Europe.

The complete suspension of poultrymeat imports to the EU market can be regarded rather as a hypothetical exercise. Although it may reduce availability of poultrymeat to the EU consumers, it would do so to a lesser extent than the 9 % indicated above. That is because the lack of imports would be compensated at least partially by European poultrymeat supply and by European pigmeat. It should be kept in mind that the EU has exported around 1 000 000 tonnes of poultrymeat in 2003 and had a trade surplus of 200 000 tonnes of that meat.

Any impact of the suspension would be, proportionally, smaller, the shorter the period in which it would be applied. In addition, any reduction in availability of meat in the EU-15 after 1 May 2004 will be mitigated by greater availability of meat from the new Member States.

---
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Lattice, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joe Noto, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
              The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
 
 (2)
              The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
      May 11, 2009
                By:
                /s/
      Joe NotoJoe
      Noto
                  Chief
      Financial Officer (principal accounting
officer)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release #06-14

Contact: (703) 808-5050 August 28, 2014

NRO Joins Facebook

The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) launched its official Facebook page 

on August 25, 2014, to increase public awareness and understanding of the NRO

and to help educate the public on NRO’s unique role in the Intelligence 

Community. Facebook is the first social media site the agency has joined.

“NRO’s social media presence will allow us to engage on the communication 

platforms many people are choosing to use. The launch of the agency’s 

Facebook page is an important step forward in our ongoing commitment to share 

the great work of NRO with the public,” said Mr. Clinton West, Director of the 

NRO Office of Congressional and Public Affairs.

This effort demonstrates NRO’s continued dedication to the president’s call for 

greater transparency and open government. The NRO plans to join additional 

social media sites in the future.

-NROThe NRO is a joint Department of Defense–Intelligence Community organization responsible for 

developing, launching, and operating America’s intelligence satellites to meet the national 

security needs of our nation.
# CE2004088EN.01020101.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/201 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/201

---

(2004/C 88 E/0208)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0667/04

by Proinsias De Rossa (PSE) to the Commission

(9 March 2004)

Subject:   Reopening of western rail corridor between Sligo and Cork in Ireland

Subject:

Following the publication of the report ‘West on Track’ which estimates that the western rail corridor between Sligo and Cork in Ireland could be reopened for under EUR 250 million and that there would be significant potential for freight traffic on the route, as well as the apparent decision by the Irish Minister for Transport to reject the opinion of his Government's Strategic Rail Review, which concluded that the line would not be viable, could the Commission indicate if the possibility of re-opening this line has been raised with it by the Irish Government? What would be the Commission's response to such a proposal? Does the Commission believe that such a proposal or part of it would be eligible for EU support under the Marco Polo or other EU programmes?

---
# CE2004084EN.01087001.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/870 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/870

---

(2004/C 84 E/0963)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0754/04

by José García-Margallo y Marfil (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(11 March 2004)

Subject:   Establishment of a European legal framework for hedge funds

Subject:

How does the Commission plan to follow up the report by Mr Purvis (A5-0476/2003) on hedge funds, and in particular the possibility of establishing a European legal framework to regulate them?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(16 April 2004)

(16 April 2004)

Regarding Parliament's vote on the report by Mr Purvis on hedge funds, Mr Margallo would like to know what follow-up action the Commission is planning, particularly on the possibility of establishing a European legal framework to regulate such funds.

The Commission would first remind the Honourable Member that, at their informal meeting in Oviedo in April 2002, the Economics and Finance Ministers undertook to examine the role played by hedge funds. This undertaking formed part of a raft of measures taken in the wake of the Enron scandal.

At the same time, several initiatives were launched at international level in this connection, including by the Financial Stability Forum (FSF), the International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) and national regulators such as the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

The report by Mr Purvis represents a major contribution in this respect. It should also be borne in mind that the Commission's Internal Market Directorate-General set up in October 2003 four professional expert working groups to examine, among other things, the strategic priorities for the work to be undertaken by the Commission in the years ahead. One of the groups has been charged with examining asset management while another will look into securities issues. The Commission will, of course, take into account the groups' conclusions, which will be published by the end of April and then opened for public consultation between May and July. A high-level conference will be held on 22/23 June. It is only after the results of the public consultation and the conclusions of the high-level conference have been analysed that the Commission will take an official position on the subject of derivatives and alternative investment funds.

---