alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (SEC Registration Numbers 33-56622, 33-78462, 33-87348, 333-11216, 333-11370, 333-13680 and 333-92124) of Creative Technology Ltd. of our report dated September 26, 2007, relating to the financialstatements which appears in this Annual Report on Form 20-F. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated September 26, 2007, relating to the Financial Statement Schedule, which appears in this Form 20-F. 

**PricewaterhouseCoopers**

Singapore 

November 16, 2007
# CE2004088EN.01020801.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/208 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/208

---

(2004/C 88 E/0216)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0762/04

by José García-Margallo y Marfil (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(11 March 2004)

Subject:   Commission proposals for follow-up to the financial services action plan

Subject:

During 2004 the Commission intends to launch a broad consultation exercise on the possible follow-up to its financial services action plan from the end of the 1990s. Is it not astonishing that, when it comes to European economic strategy, the Commission is not first drafting a White Paper, for example, setting out the developments it envisages in terms of policy strategy for Europe before embarking on this consultation exercise?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(26 April 2004)

(26 April 2004)

The wide-ranging consultation exercise that the Commission has launched in respect of financial integration will take stock of progress made as the legislative phase of the Financial Services Action Plan draws to a close. It is intended to assess the contribution made to the policy objectives defined at the outset of the process — namely, the effective operation of European financial markets, investor protection and financial stability. The Commission believes that these fundamental policy objectives are likely to remain the key concepts for evaluating EU policy in this sphere over the long-term.

The work of the Commission in respect of its policy on financial integration forms part of the overarching Lisbon strategy for global competitiveness. It is informed by the ongoing discussions on structural reform in the context of the Broad Economic Policy Guidelines — including the views expressed by the Parliament on the latter. It takes full account of additional long-term policy reflections such as the report of the independent high level group on ‘an agenda for a growing Europe’ (Sapir report). Therefore, the Commission believes that its efforts in this field form an integral part of a broader and well-orchestrated economic strategy.

The consultation process on financial integration will provide ‘bottom-up’ feedback on an important area of structural reform policy. This will allow the EU institutions to fine-tune further work in this area and maximise the contribution to overarching economic policy objectives. Any policy orientations to be drawn from this stock-taking process will also be the subject of open debate and consultation.

---
# CE2004084EN.01090501.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/905 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/905

---

(2004/C 84 E/1000)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0895/04

by Jan Andersson (PSE) to the Commission

(19 March 2004)

Subject:   Dispute concerning port dues in Helsingborg

Subject:

The Helsingborg port company and SweFerry AB have been in dispute over port dues since 1997. The issue was referred to the Commission in the same year. In 2002, I asked the Commission when it would state its position. Now, in the spring of 2004, the Commission has still not stated its position. When does it intend to do so?

Answer given by Mr Monti on behalf of the Commission

(15 April 2004)

(15 April 2004)

The Honourable Member refers to complaints by two ferry-operators alleging an abuse of a dominant position by the Port of Helsingborg concerning excessive and discriminatory pricing. Since the previous written question E-3064/01 (1) by the Honourable Member on this matter, the Commission has progressed noticeably in its examination of these very complex cases.

1

In February 2003, the Commission informed the complainants in writing of its preliminary position, in respect of which the complainants have submitted their comments. The Port of Helsingborg has also presented its views on the Commission's preliminary position and on the comments of the complainants. In addition, the Commission has requested and obtained further data from the parties as well as from third parties. On the basis of all this information, the Commission is now preparing the final decision which is expected to be adopted before the end of 2004.

---

(1)  OJ C 147 E, 20.6.2002.

1

---
#### Bliss, Respondent, vs. Rosenkrans, Appellant.

*September 12*

October *3, 1905.*

*Appeal and error: Failure to file record: Imposition of terms: Under-talcing: Insufficient justification of sureties: Dismissal of appeal.*

1. A motion to dismiss an appeal because the record has not been filed in time can be met by the imposition ot terms where the record is filed when the motion is heard. *

2. Under sec. 3065, Stats. 1898 (providing that an undertaking on an appeal shall be of no effect unless it shall be accompanied by the affidavit of the sureties, in which' each surety shall state that he is worth a certain sum mentioned, which sum so sworn to shall, in the aggregate, • be double the amount specified in said undertaking), an undertaking that the appellant will pay costs and damages awarded against him on appeal not exceeding ?250, and that he would pay a judgment of $394 if affirmed, to which was annexed justification of sureties worth $788 in the aggregate according to their affidavits, does not comply with the statutory requirements, and the appeal will be dismissed.

*533Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: OeRen T. Williams, Circuit Judge.

*Dismissed.*

Defendant appealed from a judgment against him in the sum of $394. The only undertaking served was to the effect that the appellant would pay costs and damages awarded against him on appeal, not exceeding $250, and that he would pay the judgment if affirmed. It was signed by two sureties, each of whom made affidavit that he was worth the sum of $394. Eespondent moves to dismiss the appeal, first, because the record was not filed in time, and, secondly, because no undertaking satisfying the statute was served.

*8. F. Wetzler,*for the motion.

*A. JEL. Blatchley, contra.*

Dodge, J.

The first ground urged for dismissal could he met by imposition of terms, since the record has now been filed; but the second ground of motion seems to us insuperable. Sec. 3065, Stats.^898, provides:

> “An undertaking upon an appeal shall be of no effect unless it shall be accompanied by the affidavit of the sureties, in which each surety shall state that he is worth a -certain sum mentioned, . . . and- which sums so sworn to shall, in the aggregate, be double the amount specified in said undertaking.”

The amount specified in the undertaking is the aggregate of $250 limitation on costs and damages upon appeal and the face of the $394 judgment in the court below, or $644. The aggregate worth of the two sureties, according to their affidavits, is $788, which falls far short of double the amount specified in the undertaking. For this reason the appeal must be dismissed.

*By the Court.*— So ordered.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

DEC 19, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-11479

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 06-04820-CV-JFG-E

BKCY. No. 05-44442-JJR-13

IN RE: PHILLIP A. TALLEY,

Debtor.

__________________________________________________________________

PHILLIP A. TALLEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CITY OF MOODY, AL,

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

_________________________

(December 19, 2007)

Before BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
2

Phillip A. Talley appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in

favor of the City of Moody, Alabama, in a bankruptcy adversary proceeding. 

Talley alleges the City violated his bankruptcy stay by forcing him to pay a traffic

fine after his bankruptcy petition was filed. The bankruptcy court concluded the

traffic fine was a continuation of criminal proceedings permitted by 11 U.S.C.

§ 362(b)(1). The district court affirmed. After review of the record and the

parties’ briefs, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s well-reasoned

opinion of February 28, 2007.

AFFIRMED.
7. I 

I 

REF ID:A68691 --

i Contents of packages forwarded 29 Dec 58. 

' 

WFF-2f/J 

WFF-21 

WFF-22 

WFF-23 

WFF-24 

List of Contractors for Admiral Wenger. 

File returned to Admiral Wenger. 

Lecture "26 Factorial or Bust" - returned to Mr. Callima.hos 

File No. A 56-46 - Communication Intelligence. A Presentation 

by Mr. William F. Friedman to the Faculty and Students of Class 

5f/J-B. Air Communication and Electronic Staff Officers' Course - 29 September 195f/J. 

and 

File m 4777 - German: Decode of German Codes 13f/J4f/J and 595f/J 

and 26S4f/J. From fil.es of MI-8. 

See attached l.ist. 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-23-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
REF ID:A226310B 

• Vacaville 11, Jan 8, 1950, 

Dear Bill~ 

In a few days time Am.nie and I will be heading east again, we 

will be back in New YRrk on the 18th, and will stay at the Russel 

hotel an Park Ave, until we sail for home on the 26th. 

With regard to gen. Saccos new book, the French edition is still 

only in the t~anslation stage. You will however soon get a copy 

of the Italian ed., autographed by Sacco. 

I am afraid that we shall not be in position of going to Washington before we sail for Eurppe, which we regret very much as we 

hoped to see you again before leaving the US this time. 

As I may then not see you, I would kindly ask you to inform med 

if Gretener should .send a formal offer tor his ETK-telE:Jcrypto sets 

or if the quotations I gave you will suffice, in case you want a 

couple of machines for sttidyo 

My own new work is progr~ssing satisfactorily, and in case you 

would like to ba kept infor~ed as to d~veiliopmenta, please tell 

me. 

As my own movements are somewhat erratic, I bave not written 

myself to the Chief Signal Officer, with re~ard to my new device 

which could be uaed for the M-209'a, but have asked Kirke to do 

this. 

I do hope that all 1a well with you, Elizabeth and your children. 

We send you all our best regards and love. 

~ 

Sincerely 

---------

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 08-05-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
EXHIBIT
32











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Premier Financial Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Robert W. Walker and Brien M. Chase, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our
knowledge:





o
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and





o
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








By:  /s/
Robert W. Walker


---------------------------------------


Robert
W. Walker


President
and Chief Executive Officer








By:  /s/
Brien M. Chase


---------------------------------------


Brien
M. Chase


Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





Date:
March 28, 2008
DIGEST OF THE DIRECTOR'S 

STAFF CONFERENCE 

TO: Chiefs of Offices 

and Staff Divisions 

FROM: Chief of Staff 

1. CHIEF OF STAFF 

2 NOV 195~ 

Our preliminary planning directive and guidance in connecti011 

with the IDng Range Planning Program is being forwarded to Chiefs ot 

Offices and Staff Divisions tor comment before completing the final 

planning directive. Your comments should be forwarded by 12 Rovember. 

2. IOGISTICS 

a. Announced the appointments of Ma.Jor Clayton E. Qa.gnon, USA, 

as Chief' of the Supply Branch, and Ma.Jor Elden J. Burgett, USA, Accountable Supply otf'icer. 

b. Reminded those concerned with the interim. DDve that requirements tor the services of' GSA mat be forwarded to IDG b7 

1 December. 

c. Requested Chief's of Otf'icea and Sta:tt Di visiom to recheck 

their requirements tor items of' procurement before the interim move. 

3· DIRECTOR 

"I am very intolerant ot people who laok the abilit7 to visualize. 

In our business, we D11Bt constantly check and recheck and program. for our 

future requiremn:ta. Anyone who bas a requirement at the new ai te shouJ4 

be constantly reviewing his beeds. Let's not turn ou.t 8ZJ'¥ ot our requirements that are o~ designed tor yesterday." 

.a~eJ.~i~ Asst to the Che:~ statt 

Distribution: 

Special 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-28-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

C()NFIDENTIAL
Exhibit24.6

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appointseach of Robert K. Kretzman and Michael T. Sheehan or either of them,each acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, withfull power of substitution, for him and his name, place and stead, inany and all capacities, in connection with the REVLON, INC. (the"Corporation") Annual Report on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Form10-K") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing,to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation oron behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of theCorporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument,contract, document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibitsthereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including thispower of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and anyapplicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body,granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone,full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thingrequisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fullyto all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, herebyratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents,each acting alone, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do orcause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has signed these presents this 18th day ofFebruary, 2004.

|  | /s/ EDWARD J.LANDAU |
|--|---------------------|

|  |
|--|
|  |  |  |
|  |

|  | EDWARDJ. LANDAU |
|--|-----------------|

----
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-11031

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ARTURO TORRES-CABRERA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:17-CR-627-1

Before DAVIS, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Arturo Torres-Cabrera appeals his conviction for illegal reentry after 

deportation and his sentence of 33 months of imprisonment and two years of 

supervised release. He argues that his sentence exceeded the statutory 

maximum because the enhanced penalty provision of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) is 

unconstitutional. He also asserts that his guilty plea was involuntary because 

he was not admonished that his prior felony conviction could only be used to 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 21, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-11031 Document: 00514883440 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/21/2019
No. 18-11031

2

enhance his sentence under § 1326(b)(1) if it was submitted to a jury and 

proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

However, Torres-Cabrera has filed an unopposed motion for summary 

disposition and a letter brief conceding that these issues are foreclosed by 

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998). He explains that he 

has raised the issues only to preserve them for possible further review. 

Accordingly, because summary disposition is appropriate, see Groendyke 

Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), Torres-Cabrera’s 

motion is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 18-11031 Document: 00514883440 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/21/2019
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Marvin Frank Hall, Appellant

No. 06-15-00019-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 8th District Court of 

Franklin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. F8859). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed 

for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Marvin Frank Hall, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MAY 1, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
REF ID:A27561B 

F;:: J t: t ~1 A. /1/ 

22 July 1958 

DI> JOB RICOIDt 

l. Viaited OSD Jll&P (Lt Col leppa) in acmpeny with Colonel Smellie 

to di•cua• ue.irity clua1t'1cation of certain signal. corps publications 

vhicb Mr. heidman dea1res to use, or quote :rem, in a book he 1• vri ting. 

llBA. dec1a1on to dieapprove Mr. J'reidllan'• request vas baaed upon DOD 5200.1 

dated 8 .Jt.iq 1958 which et.a.tea (Part 6 II A) "all material directly related 

to crn>tosraphic ll)'lltema vhich vu prev1ou•J.7 claaai:tied Restricted • 

Security ln1'orm&ti0Jl. 1• ~to Contidential ·-------." The CBO, in a 

lAtter to JrSA, stated 'that, in bi• opinion, tbe matter vu in the cosnisance 

o~ DIBRSA.. 

2. Colonel Reppe. a4Vimed that DOD 5200.1 dated 19 November 1953 contained 

v1rtual.ly tbe nme statement, that. ia; (VI A) "all material. related to 

cryptographic syatema now cluaified Be•tric~-Security In:tomat1on 1• 

upgraded to Co~1dential 4 (under acoring supplied). Tbua, it ia Colonel ~ 

Reppa 'a opinion that docuiaenta relating to cr,ypto aystema which bad been c;-

docla••1..t'1ed prior to 19 lovem.ber 1953 vere not attected by either DOD 

end remain Unclaaai:N.ed. It i• hi• turther opinion that all au.ch publication• 

which were alasaitied Jhatr1cte4 Security Into:rmation on 19 November 1953 •bould 

nov be cl.uai:tied "Confidential." and ehoul4 not be relAaaed ror public con.umption. 

He ~lieved that. ISA action 1n cliaapprovtng Kr. 1reidman'11 reque•t vu Juatitied.1 and, even it' we difl Appl.'Oft,, be believe• the MS abould then be presented 

to Sec])e:t prior to Hleaae. 

3. "COlonel 1'eppe. al.eo stated that, eince both DOD• have been distributed 

to the Bern.ce•, the proper elae•it'ication and protection o:t the afi'ected 

ll!Jlterial vaa their reapons1bil1ty tor any copies beld by thtmi. 

4. Colonel lteppa expresnd acme surprise that theae ~blieat.iorus were 

held by Mr. Freidman. 

;. l intormmd Colonel Reppe. that ISA intended to diaeuae the matter o-r 

University ot MichigM reproducing material. trcim one ot the volume• with the 

proper ottiaiale at the Uni vere1 ty. .} 

6. Colonel Smellie eonc'U's in thim K/a. 

cca 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 05-16-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1902 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1902

 To provide for the treatment and extension of temporary financing of 
                   short-time compensation programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 2015

   Mr. Reed introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the treatment and extension of temporary financing of 
                   short-time compensation programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Layoff Prevention Extension Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY FINANCING OF SHORT-TIME COMPENSATION 
              PAYMENTS IN STATES WITH PROGRAMS IN LAW.

    (a) Extension.--
            (1) In general.--Subsection (b) of section 2162 of the 
        Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (26 U.S.C. 
        3304 note) is amended--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ``3 years'' 
                and inserting ``5 years''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2)--
                            (i) in the heading, by striking ``Three-
                        year'' and inserting ``Five-year''; and
                            (ii) by striking ``156 weeks'' and 
                        inserting ``260 weeks''.
            (2) Effective date.--The amendments made by paragraph (1) 
        shall take effect as if included in the enactment of such 
        section 2162.
    (b) Technical Correction.--
            (1) In general.--Section 3306(v)(6) of the Internal Revenue 
        Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 3306) is amended by inserting ``or the 
        Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act'' after ``1998''.
            (2) Effective date.--The amendment made by paragraph (1) 
        shall take effect on the day that is 2 years after the date of 
        the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION FOR GRANTS 
              FOR SHORT-TIME COMPENSATION PROGRAMS.

    (a) Extension.--Subsection (c)(1) of section 2164 of the Middle 
Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (26 U.S.C. 3304 note) is 
amended by striking ``December 31, 2014'' and inserting ``December 31, 
2016''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of such section 2164.
                                 <all>
```
SF.0 

REF ID:A67775 

eeNflDENTW. 

eeHP.£ BBN!ili.i 

St.OO'ftl \Y lhHtt«fiATWN-

\ 

Certltication ot Public Law 513 

OONS lS Dec 19.$2 

In accordance with AFSA Manorandum No. 120-18/1,, certification that public 

law 51.3 has been rev.1.ewed b.Y all personnel assigned to the Office ot the 

Consultant is herewith submitted. 

WILLIAM F. .FRtEDMAH 

Consultant 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-12-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352\3