alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
P. 1



# OAR Box 1830 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 50 ) IV-C-1 6
Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:53 AM Sheet 50of 232P. 2 

## /r-80^_
_ 

# H Z 

# -C-K, JA N- 4 

## 198 8

Honorabl e Rober t C . Byrd Onite< 3 State s Senat e Washington , D C 2051 0 Dea r Senato r Byrd t Thi s I s i

nrespons e t o you r Decembe r 11 , 198 7 lette r relayin g you r concern s an dth e concern s o f you r constituent s regardinq EPA' s regulator y propose dt o requir e onboar d canister s o nne*

» vehicle s t o contro l refuelin g emissions . To assis t yo u wit hyou r responses , I hav e enclose da cop y o f ou r proposa l fo r you r review . Sectio nB (page s 31177-31182 ) explain s EPA' s overal l rational e fo r proposin g onboar d controls . I f yo u woultf lik e furthe r detail s o f ou r analysis , pleas e contac t Mr . Phili p Carlso no f the Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc ho f the Emissio nContro l Technolog y Division , 25* 5 Plymout hRoad , An nArbor , M I 481C 5 (7T S 374-827 0 o r Commercia l (313 ) 668-4270) . Thank yo u for you r letter . w« £ wil l plac e the letter s fro m the For

ddealership s inou r publi c docke t an dfull y

conside r thei r conaent s inth e nex t phas e o f ou r rulemakin g process . Sincerel y

yours , ORIGINA LSIGNE D B Y RICHAR D D

. WILSO N Richar dD . Wilson Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s Enclosur e
cc : Docke t A-87-1 1 SDSB:Carlson:Dillingham:2565Ply*iout hRd . :X270:12/22/87:ID*5556 W Las t reviewe db

y Che t Franc e for Charle s Grav:12/22/8 7 AL 70438 1P. 3

ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N

ARFWO Y

. , J

. D liLj 0 CENT:V.!

. DOCKE T
29 January 1954 

l. It 1• our opinion that g1 ven the tollow1ng reeervationa the UK 

proposal as amended is acceptable:. 

a. Because of the UK requirement for "f1Dal" agreement on minor 

aspects O't the Mild•• Standarda -paper at a meetiDS ot the UK and ts 4elegatee 

to be helcl in Landon, the tull COlllllente or the UIC on tbia paper must be exud.ne4 

1n advanae ill order to ascertain whether •uch an agreement can be azaticipatecl. 

It it appears that there are problems of serious mqnttude imolve4 it •Y 

prove imposeible to accept the requirement. 

b. Certain changes of a minor nature must be made in the UK proposal. 

We believe these cbsngea will be accepted b7 Tilt.man. 

2. The above mentioned changes are: 

A14e·Memo1re - proposed para 2 

Change "a1gn1f'icsnt" to "claaaU'1e4". 

- proposed para 5 

Retain U.S. version. 

Brief for Deleptea - proposed para 24 

NSA Form 781-ClO 6 Jul 51 

Change UK last sentence to read "The tS and OK Delegations will 

tq- to- aeaure Freaeh agreemeat to the prepare4 -liat ot 

Dangerous-Practices. French recommendations tor ao41ficat1ou, especially amplification, will be encouraged and 

considered OD tbelr own merits. '?lie BeJglitlUDll a1e 1Etid:Dled: 

- _ _u l\ 

U.:-Jec1a1ons on these points must nece•aarily be UDBDimoua . " 

TOP SECRET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-03-2014 pursuantto E_Q_ 1352a 
NSA Form 781-CJO 6 Jul SI 

- proposed. deletion o'f eubparaa (e) through (b) 

'l'bie is acceptable With the inclusion ot the proposed nev 

para (t) submitted b)' Tilt.man. 

- proposed nev para (e) 

Delete second sentence. 

- proposed. nev para (f) 

In the f'i:Bt sentence cbange "delegates" to "delegations". 

In the second sentence move clause "the final text-~-----London" 

to follow inmediately af'ter the words "suitable Yeraion". 

In the third sentence, strike all after "probability" and replace 

- proposed amendment to para 3(a)C!) 

Perfectly acceptable. 

- proposed para 4(b) 

Propose fol.l.ow1ng version: 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

"It the French ask pointblank quasti~ about national cipher 

systems of the ts or UK, a frank Sll8Wer shoul41 wherever perm1ae1ble, be given. If' tbe reply to such a question should 

invol-ve revelation of matter bOt approved by the m and UK f'or 

release, the answer ahoul.d eimpl.J' be that each country (UIC and 

tll) baa a national security policy which prohibits revelation or 

aueh intorma.tion except aa expllcit\T approved." 

TOPe SECRET 
3. ID ad41 tion to the propoae4 UK changes it 1a strongly recommended 

that para 2(1) ~ the Brief f'or Delegates be deleted. 

lt.. In ac141tion it is recommended that both CODllllU in the last sentence 

ot para l(a) ot the Brief' 'for Delegates be deleted. 

3 

NSA Form 781-ClO 6 Jul 51 TOP SECRET
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 4.1


This certificate is transferable    Engage Technologies, Inc.   CUSIP 292827102
in Boston, MA or New York, NY       Incorporated under the laws
                                    of the State of Delaware


     ENGAGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. transferable on the books of the Company by the
holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this
Certificate properly endorsed or assigned.  This Certificate and the shares
represented hereby are issued under and shall be held subject to the laws of the
State of Delaware and the provisions of this Second Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation and the Amended and Restated By-Laws of the
Company, as amended from time to time, to which the holder by acceptance hereof
assents.  This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned and registered by
the Transfer Agent and Registrar.

     WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures
of its duly authorized officers.

Dated:

_______________________                                  ______________________
Chief Financial Officer  [Seal of Corporation Here]      President and
and Treasurer                                            Chief Executive Officer



                           ENGAGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

     The Corporation is authorized to issue more than one class of stock. Upon
written request, made by the holder of this Certificate, the Corporation will
furnish to such holder without charge a copy of the full text of the
preferences, voting powers, qualifications and special and relative rights of
the shares of each class authorized to be issued, as set forth in the Second
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended from time to time.

     For value received, _____________________________ hereby sell, assign and
transfer unto _____________________________ shares of the common stock
represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint ________________________________ Attorney to transfer the said stock on
the books of the within named Company with full power of substitution in the
premises.

Dated: _____________________
<PAGE>

                         _______________________________________________________
              Notice:    The signature to this assignment must correspond with
                         the name as written upon the face of the certificate in
                         every particular without alteration or enlargement or
                         any change whatever.


         Signature(s)    _______________________________________________________
         Guaranteed:     The signature(s) should be guaranteed by an eligible
                         guarantor institution (banks, stockbrokers, savings and
                         loan associations and credit unions with membership in
                         an approved signature guarantee medallion program),
                         pursuant to S.E.C. Rule 17Ad-15.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code
  (i)
    
    The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934; and
 (ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  May 15, 2007
    /s/   DANA M. KELLEYDana M. KelleyChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
 
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


                      Consent of Independent Accountants

The Board of Directors
Summit Technology, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No.33-25169), (No.33-41451), (No.33-49162), (No. 33-79158), (No. 333-03765),
(No. 333-26142) and (No. 333-41583) on Forms S-8, S-8, S-8, S-3, S-3, S-8, and
S-8, respectively, of Summit Technology, Inc. of our report dated March 6, 1998,
except as to Note 10, which is as of March 27, 1998 and except for the
restatement referred to in Note 18, as to which the date is March 9, 1999
relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Summit Technology, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows and related schedules for each
of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 1997, which report
appears in this current report on Form 8-K of Summit Technology, Inc. dated 
March 23, 1999.


                                              /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                                  KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
March 23, 1999
Filed: April 18, 2002

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7924

(CR-92-108)

United States of America,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

Juanita Walker Cooper,

Defendant - Appellant.

ORDER

The court amends its opinion filed March 28, 2002, as follows:

On the cover sheet, section 3 -- the lower court information

is corrected to begin “Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston.”

On page 2, line 6 -- “S.D.W.Va.” is corrected to read “D.S.C.”

For the Court - By Direction

/s/ Patricia S. Connor

Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7924

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JUANITA WALKER COOPER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CR-92-108)

Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 28, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Juanita Walker Cooper, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Juanita Walker Cooper appeals from the district court’s order

denying her motions to modify her term of imprisonment and to

dismiss the indictment and her conviction. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Cooper, No. CR-92-108 (D.S.C. Oct. 25,

2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
,_ 

• 

Jtt.a..JAB.,....._ 

vs .. P.Net4911\ 

!CA ~~:tstowt• 

66~ t.lb'Mt 

1'w Y~ II, 8'I Yotlc 

~Mr.~; 

l!l • ~ 1ftte to J'Cl'lJ t\ ........ ~-- ~ to 

tile .Wl AplPt1 ~tae ot the Mwal ~"7 At/lflllll1 ~U!-e 

~...., ~. ~ llC'M~· ·~, vho .-a 'alllO ....... iYF th• .._., trl.U \Ha a\.ltJ tft OCWd'e 111.tb Jn'& en .~ nt »G8'1 o~· 

attm ~ f't\1iea atttntw. · · . . 

\Fe _.. MM _..1li*'f a Joia' --- ot all .... ,_.la d 

~ ~ - 2CMQ. - 1'51t. DurUc - ....s.iw ot -. tun 

,,,..,, au the~ .-n~ ~ wt.U i. Me019U.th'8.. 

9ds *"'14 ~ ~a ·~ f/11 bot\IN. .. 7"'1Dler or tN . nm .., ~ ... dieto'.a. to aeci-t.dlll81"'J. vttb ..... btp1i.pto 

or 'Cltllt Cll"Pld.Ue11 ...,_it• .wt. lblll •4'JClll4 ....,.,. 21 Jloltr, v1u 

1"t •"'*1 1'o a ~ Jl'Wl••:ut.aloa aDI \U4~ ot tmw ot 

cw '8eb91..:t ~ Rd "° plltM fClt' ·~ JftMl 1'K1.ft• t:t... . 

D S• ~ baS*' .. J!01a vill lO a\1- to a~ ._ 

-'lap - '°"·*· ..... 1.t 10\1· vsu 1tlt - biolt *" ,. »lU. to .t1*4 .. tM .a. 

o1 v..1 rw Jltf(I•, i vsu ,..._-. ~ •• ..., u..1 e11aw. .-t 

'tO JDU.. . 

M/Ri Amlounces Joint maeting ot Panele of 11SASAB1 and invites 

attera&mee ot Jrdlllbea. -

if iiCDOiial'.Ci/Lt,V8Ar I 

Asst to S/ASFn/ero ·. 

,_,., pproved for Release by NSA on 12-01-2014 

ursuantto E.O. 13526
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         232,208
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               33,660,356
<ALLOWANCES>                                   606,000
<INVENTORY>                                 39,065,712
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            74,841,210
<PP&E>                                      53,189,952
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,056,945
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             110,311,005
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,198,756
<BONDS>                                     40,035,702
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,039,148
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               110,311,005
<SALES>                                    122,861,648
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           122,861,648
<CGS>                                      102,489,130
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              102,489,130
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,718,152
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             938,622
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,715,744
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,475,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,240,744
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,240,744
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .45


</TABLE>
1

14 Jan 2014

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Rulemaking and Flight Standards Office

SUBJ: EXEMPTION FROM 91.9(b)(2) AND 91.203(a) AND (b) FOR N544L AND 

N500VD INSTANT EYE MK-2

As per my letter dated 20 Dec 2014 I respectfully request exemption from FAR 91.9 (b)

(b)(2) and 91.203(a) for N544L and N500VD InstantEye MK-2 Unmanned Aerial 

Vehicle. 

As per your response on 08 Jan 2014 requesting additional information for the following: 

1) The	reason	why	granting	the	request	would	be	in	the	public	interest;	that	is,	how	it	

would	benefit	the	public	as	a	whole.	

2) The	reasons	why	the	exemption	would	not	adversely	affect	safety	or	how	the	

exemption	would	provide	a	level	of	safety	at	least	equal	to	that	provided	by	the	rule	

from	which	you	seek	an	exemption

3) Any	addition	information,	views,	or	arguments	available	to	support	your	request.	

It would be in the public’s best interest to have the aircraft registration, airworthiness 

certificate, aircraft flight manual, and any other required documentation off the aircraft 

and located near the pilot. 

In case of an emergency, the aircraft flight manual would be located near the pilot and 

ground control station rather then in the unmanned aircraft. In addition, if at any time the 

FAA request the registration, airworthiness certificate, or any other required 

documentation the pilot would not have access to it if it is located in the unmanned 

aircraft.

As you can see in Figure (1), (2) and (3), this Unmanned Aerial Vehicle is micro size and 

weighs less than one pound, so it’s in the public interest to keep all required 

documentation at the ground control station which will always be in immediate proximity 

to the PIC. This will also not adversely affect safety, and will provide a level of safety 

equal to that provided by the rule which we request an exemption.

• Wingspan. 22.5 cm (8.9 inches) (frame); 37.5 cm (14.8 inches) (frame + props)

• Length. 22.5 cm (8.9 inches) (frame); 37.5 cm (14.8 inches) (frame + props)
2

 Figure 1 - InstantEye Mk-2 Components

 

 Figure 2 – Suggested InstantEye Experimental marking (top of UAV)
3

 

Figure 3 - InstantEye Bottom view 

Sincerely, 

DALLAS CORMIER 

Dallas Cormier, SD1173

San Diego Gas & Electric 

Sempra Energy

101 Ash St. 

San Diego, CA 92101
<PAGE>

                   Exhibit A to Certificate of Amendment of
          Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
                         Merkert American Corporation



EXHIBIT 4.2



                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                      OF
           SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                      OF
                         MERKERT AMERICAN CORPORATION


          Merkert American Corporation, a corporation organized and existing
under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,
DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

       FIRST: That the Board of Directors and stockholders of Merkert American
       ------
Corporation have duly adopted resolutions amending its Second Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation as set forth on Exhibit A hereto.
                                                      ---------

       SECOND:  That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
       -------
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its President, thereunto duly authorized, this 18th day of August,
1999.



                                    MERKERT AMERICAN CORPORATION


                                    By: /s/ Gerald R. Leonard
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    Gerald R. Leonard
                                    President & CEO
<PAGE>

                    Exhibit A to Certificate of Amendment of
          Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
                          Merkert American Corporation

1.     Article I of the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
(the "Certificate") is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:

                                     NAME
                                     ----

             The name of the Corporation is Marketing Specialists Corporation.


                                       2
# CE2004084EN.01016901.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/169 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/169

---

(2004/C 84 E/0207)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0159/04

by Anna Karamanou (PSE) to the Commission

(22 January 2004)

Subject:   Trial of women for illegal abortion in Portugal

Subject:

In the town of Aveiro in Portugal, a trial is being held of women who have undergone termination of pregnancy. Despite the appeals and resolutions of the European Parliament calling on the governments of the Member States to refrain under any circumstances from prosecuting women who have had an illegal abortion, Portugal continues to enforce its criminal legislation prohibiting abortion, which is not consistent with the fundamental rights of women.

Given the differences in sexual and reproductive health and related rights in the EU and within the Member States and, in particular, the enormous disparities among Europeans in terms of access to reproductive health services, contraception and voluntary termination of pregnancy, and in view of the fact that women and men should be free to take their own responsible decisions about their sexual and reproductive health and rights, what measures will the Commission take to decriminalise abortion in the EU so that women are not brought to trial for matters relating to their physical and mental integrity?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(26 February 2004)

(26 February 2004)

The Honourable Member will recall from recommendation 13 of the Van Lancker report on sexual and reproductive rights, which was adopted in July 2002 by the Parliament, that criminal law applying to illegal abortion of national citizens is entirely a national competence of the Member States.

---
REF ID:A517045 

· · be d · 1117 b tb.- perooonel oll1eially Indoctrinated in .eeordallC8 with com• !8P Bl!leBI! ~~r~ ~d authorized to receive the information reported berela.. 

'RQ. 3~$Ih}(2) 

EIJ.8{)-36/5QUSC3605 IPBCaUll 15MAY1953 

~.J~ ;.!!:=-~ Ir,,!:!;:i~i~7~~! vu 10=-~ C:t 

a·. ·.eimtlar·probl.m··. ··.. vaa that orl l«m'WJl1(!e•t•1cm aec:v15- The · \t1ecieicn of 11JCD vu that a atuiSy em eValm.uan atl _ CCllSIC 

VOUl.4 be DfJde.. (mcIB 23/lD) . 

13 J\al.y 1951 - Report co.1 1 CCllSIC tozvardecl to mcm (18cD 23/18). 

At tbe\66tb Meeting ··oi: 1ECD 1 t was agreed tbat tbe M Boe Caal. ttee 

re&pcm8ib1e tor prepuo&t1m ot UBCD '23/18 would pruerat ad41 t1cmal 

1D:tormat1Qll au tbe above au'bJect tor ccmaideration at the next UBCIB 

meeting. 

8 October 1951 .. lletaile4 plan ot approach to tbel . ltorvardecl to mcm 

(18cD 23/'30) (TAB 1) oo 12 October mcm approved the alxne plaD am 

•tborized tbe Department ot State to mire neceaaary edJ*t:tmDta baaed CD 

AmbaHedor llacVeagh'a rec•111neadatiOD11 aDd to proceed with 1•Je1 ntatiOll 

ot the plan, aubJect to ccmcurrence ill principle by appropriate! I 

autbori ties. (mc:IB 23/35) 

a •ovember 1951 - lSlB presented. View QD • pJ.an Vbich .... that a clirect 

approach voul4 be preferable. (m 2) 

i·· .. lcmmber lS5l - hrBonal -sage to llr. ti'ic J<:mea traa Brig&d1er '.rilt.-n. 

(abo've. 2 ... sages croeaecl in trw1t) Cm 3) .. 

9 lovember\1951 .. 1.BD replied. to Brigadier tiltmn'o •••1168· (TAB 4) ~• 

m11eage· .. - --at tile 'llllt --of ·.llfD ;i 1:119 - mthorize4 State 

~ 

...,,.TB to hold turtmr cU.acuu1cm vitb aat. !'lit.a. It vu 

UDilentood tllat tol.l.ov1ag theae diacaHica ~te n: nn wml4 prei-re &a\ appropriate •a•age to IBD 1n tarther 3mtU'icatiCD ot tbl ts plea. 

23 Bonmbez' l~ - lllCD ~ to l8D u JC' deci81ca 7lat ... tiDg. (W 5) 

J.8 3afllJArY l9S2 •At the 73rc1 meetiJlg ot mcD 1t wa a:aote4 tbat AllbuMdor Mac'leagh 

w bem u.trmtea Cll s December 1951 to ta1re 11.P the •tter ot1 I 

I \. I ~ .. t111g took ~··cm. 20 ~ 1951 iD4 

t&i Ji'biiiiaor'• pruentiticm - wll. :rece1ve4. (18cD 23/\3) 

24 llarch 1952 - At the 15th meetiDg ot mcD :twther mt.ail.a ot the -tms •twea 

ltacVeagh ~ ;practe4 w the .... n. ('!'AB 6) 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-13-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a