alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PECHANGA INDIAN RESERVATION 

October 21, 2014 

Mr. Jared Blumenfeld 

Regional Administrator 

Temecula Band oj Luisefio Mission Indians 

Post Office Box 1477 • Temecula, CA 92593 

Telephone (951) 770-6000 Fax (951) 695-1778 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

Tribal Chairman: 

Mark Macarro 

Council Members: 

Catalina R Chacon 

Corrina R Garbani Sanchez 

Marc Luker 

Andrew Masiel, Sr. 

Robert "RJ." Munoa 

Russell "Butch" Murphy 

Tribal Secretary: 

Louise Burke 

Tribal Treasurer: 

Christina McMenamin 

Re: Revised PMz.s Designation Recommendation for the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission 

Indians 

Dear Mr. Blumenfeld: 

The Pechanga Band of Luisefio Mission Indians (Tribe) appreciates the opportunity to submit a 

revised recommendation for the designation of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for PMz.5. 

In accordance with the appropriate provisions of the Clean Air Act, the Tribe recommends that the 

air quality management area within the Pechanga Reservation's exterior boundaries be designated 

as attainmentjunclassifiable for the annual fine particle PMz.s standards. This recommendation 

replaces the recommendation made by the Tribe in our letter to you dated December 17, 2013. 

Under the standards enunciated in your letter of August 19,2014, EPA intends to use a designation 

category of "unclassifiablejattainment" for areas that are monitoring attainment or do not have 

monitors, and that the EPA has reason to believe are likely attainment and are not contributing to 

nearby violations." By contrast, the EPA intends to classify as "unclassifiable" those areas where the 

EPA cannot determine based on available information whether the area is meeting the NAAQS or 

where EPA has not determined that the area contributes to a nearby violation. By these standards, 

the air quality management area within the Pechanga Reservation would more properly be 

designated as "unciassifiabIejattainment" and on that basis we submit this revised 

recommendation. 

As you know, the Tribe has been monitoring PMz.s since 2008. We now have sufficient certified data 

to demonstrate a conclusive designation of attainment. The Tribe would appreciate an opportunity 

to consult with EPA on the designations process and we will be in touch with your office by phone to 

see if that is still feasible. 

Thank you for your consideration of this revised recommendation. 

Mark Macarro, 

Chairman
'', ,. 

.. 

·:,• 

',• 

:.-.:' 

~ _, ' 

' ' . 

' : ,~-. 

- ' 

,. " .... ;, 

'1,' 

.+ 

; '' ~-

·.I 

.;';,_:"': 

l '.' 

.'' 

' ' . ' ··,2 

·_D, 

~ r , ~,. 

I : f~ • 

~· '."· __ ·• '\ ' 

...... ,--'. 

-.·>' 

'-, ~- " ';
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              37                   1,364
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,724                  67,076
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (741)                   (767)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,426                  69,856
<PP&E>                                          31,421                  24,103
<DEPRECIATION>                                (13,446)                 (4,699)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,270                 264,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         (88,094)                (64,094)
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           (2)                    (10)
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,762               (134,095)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (62,270)               (264,250)
<SALES>                                        122,309                 133,907
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               122,309                 133,907
<CGS>                                         (65,696)                (73,238)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (65,696)                (73,238)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (74,305)                (72,440)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,698)                 (5,332)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,390)                (17,103)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,439                 (1,773)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,951)                (18,876)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,951)                (18,876)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                  (0.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                  (0.76)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.3


 


EXECUTION COPY


 


TERMINATION OF AMENDED AND RESTATED


OUTSOURCE AGREEMENT


 


This Termination of Amended and
Restated Outsource Agreement (this “Agreement”), dated as of October 27,
2008, is made by and between GKK Manager LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company (the “Manager”), and SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware
limited liability company (“SL Green”).


 


Reference is made to that
certain Amended and Restated Outsource Agreement (the “Outsource Agreement”),
dated as of April 19, 2006, made by and between the Manager and SL Green.  Upon executing this document below, the
undersigned parties to the Outsource Agreement hereby acknowledge and agree
that such Outsource Agreement has been terminated in its entirety and shall no
longer be in force or effect as of September 30, 2008 and all obligations
of the undersigned parties thereunder or relating thereto have been satisfied
in full and no payment of any fees, expenses or other amounts are payable
thereunder.


 


This Agreement shall be binding
upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective
successors and assigns.


 


This Agreement may be executed
and delivered via facsimile in separate counterparts, each of which, when so
executed and delivered, shall be deemed an original and all of which taken
together shall constitute one and the same agreement.


 


THIS
AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF NEW YORK WITHOUT REGARD TO THE CONFLICTS OF LAW PRINCIPLES THEREOF.


 


(Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank)


 

















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have executed this
Agreement as of the date first written above.


 


	
   

  	
  GKK MANAGER LLC

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Andrew
  S. Levine

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name: Andrew
  S. Levine

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:  
  Chief Legal Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  SL GREEN OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   /s/ Andrew S. Levine

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name: Andrew
  S. Levine

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:  
  Chief Legal Officer

  
				



 


[Signature Page for Termination of Amended
and Restated Outsource Agreement]
lib'. lan'f Olarlt 

C!biet 1 ISA luropo 

.uo 7S7 

MW rark, llev York 

Dea%' larl'1l 

REF ID:A63318 

11 hl>nae.r.Y 1955 

M~ 

l Jut 

t. to 

.l.al"094 

'be in 

7ffte:r4.q 

Pr.nkturt 

O'.t' 

at 

ti. 

or 

dq 

&bout 

betc:rre 

the very 

that 

ume 

~ 

time 

l _. Ilamtlng to be with JOU ud it oecura to• tbe.t :you., 

Colone Peter~_ ml Colaael Clark Jdsb' pret.- DO\ to have 

t-.o h1gh·lne1115A ~ viaitor• m bani!. 11rail.taneoue]1'. 

X C11U. ~ 711:1 itimrar)' ••1~ QQU&ll tt that v1U •Uit ~ 

eoavenieDoe J I oou.ld au llC.Y' E'i'A ill Fn.nkturt a.tt.r General 

Ackernan baa ien. 

X don't want 1'0U or ~ to pl.en u;v .iertatament 

tw • or m IQ' beba.lt ... X*A prefer ~, ~,. and ttm 

to talk leiaure17 with IQ' triende u4 colleague•. Tell 

COl.ccel Peteraon ud CQJ.onel Clark th&°'1 l)leall01 aaad. Uk them 

ou., l::M.t~ to follow suit. ,._ •ppl.ie• to Ut¥ vuita l 

Jldght -.lee to ..., Cit ;your or their ou.ttita. TeU them, plea.ee1 

I'm a mn vith 11aple 'tute9 AD'l. in oo aee4. :tor U¥ n.sale 

d&l•le u .,. ll001al. me. 

1 1ll be iD touch Y1th 10\1 b)' wlepbcM •1tl:Mtr tJ'Oa Pa.r1" 

OD U"rl:nl. Qll 29 l'ebruaq OX' trom Ive· 

tooJdna tcanvd w Mei»& '°"' I u, 

I 

' 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

{ 

I 

I 

lincere.ly J 

roved for Release b NSA on 06-19-2014 ursuantto E .0. 1352 \, 

I. 

\" 

•
EXHIBIT 23.1



The Board of Directors
Petco Animal Supplies, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements 
(Nos. 333-51661 and 333-45889) on Form S-3, (Nos. 33-82302, 33-95352, 333-
04442, 333-26301, and 333-48311) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-14699) on Post-
Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 to Form S-4 of Petco Animal Supplies, 
Inc. of our report dated March 17, 1999, relating to the consolidated 
balance sheets of Petco Animal Supplies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of 
January 31, 1998 and January 30, 1999, and the related consolidated 
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of 
the years in the three-year period ended January 30, 1999, which report 
appears in the January 30, 1999, annual report on Form 10-K of Petco Animal 
Supplies, Inc.


                                KPMG LLP

San Diego, California
April 28, 1999
# CE2004084EN.01036601.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/366 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/366

---

(2004/C 84 E/0424)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0344/04

by Gabriele Stauner (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(10 February 2004)

Subject:   ‘Conseillers hors classe’

Subject:

Can the Commission state how many former officials are working for DG ADMIN as so-called ‘conseillers hors classe’?

How many of these officials temporarily suspended from work are to be found in the Commission's other Directorate-Generals?

Can the Commission confirm, in this context, how many officials are currently suspended as a result of ongoing disciplinary procedures, whilst continuing to be on the payroll?

Answer given by Mr Kinnock on behalf of the Commission

(18 March 2004)

(18 March 2004)

As an appointing authority the Commission may, under the provisions of the Staff Regulations and associated operational rules, decide to reassign an official from a management position to a non-management function at any time, if it considers this to be in the interest of the service. In this context, the non-managerial function for Directors General and Deputy Directors General is ‘hors classe adviser’. An assignment to these functions can be for various periods of time and the tasks and responsibilities of these officials are defined by the relevant appointing authority.

As the Commission has previously made clear, a ‘Conseiller hors classe’ is not a ‘former’ official and such a designation certainly does not carry the meaning that the official is ‘suspended from work’.

In the case of suspension, which a provisional measure of a disciplinary nature and not an administrative measure, the official concerned ceases to exercise any function in the institution for the duration of the suspension. Under Article 88 of the Staff Regulations, the appointing authority may decide to suspend an official only when allegations of serious misconduct are brought against that person

Currently, two ‘hors classe advisers’ are working for Directorate General (DG) Personnel and Administration and three others are employed in DG Development, DG Regional Policy, and in the Office for administration and payment of individual entitlements respectively.

Four Commission officials (who are not ‘hors classe advisers’) are currently suspended from their functions in the context of ongoing disciplinary procedures being conducted because of allegations of serious misconduct.

---
ATI

- 2414287v1 

## RE: Draft Agenda for Meeting between U.S.EPA and Toray Fluorofibers (America) Inc. EPA Headquarters

– Washington D.C.

A. 

### Brief History of Toray Fluorofibers America) Inc. (TFA)

1. Description of TFA’s actions to reduce PFOA emissions since start of manufactur e ;

2. Status of conversion to Non

- PFOA Polymer ;

B. 

### Discussion of EPA’s PFOA Stewardship Program

1. Does the EPA plan to continue with the Stewardship Program?

2. Discussion of impacts of TFA's indirect participation in Stewardship program, costs of participation vis a vis competition;

3. Under this program, how will the EPA acknowledge/credit processors such as TFA in the face of ongoing investigations and competition from Overseas Imports?

C. 

### Discussion of EPA’s PFC/TSCA Action Plan

1. How does the EPA plan to address finishe d articles made from polymers using Long Chain PFC’s?

2. What plans does the EPA have to address materials made with short chain PFC’s?

3. Discuss Impact on companies, like TFA, from import of finished articles made from long chain PFC’s.

4. What can EPA do to help ?

5. What is EPA’s plan regarding manufacturers of final articles of fluoropolymer materials that are sourcing materials made using long

chain PFC’s?
REF ID:A66103 

Fiscal Requirementa ot NS.ASAB 

LOG Amit Mrs. Iuke S/MST 7 Apr 54 I 

In con:tix'Mtion of our discussions an the :t"iacal requirements or the National 

Security Agency Scientif'ic Mvi•or:r '.Boo.rd and ita Panela, the :toll.Otllng are eubmi tted aa the beat available eatimates 1 

la#t Quarter rt f 54 .. $20, 000. 

n '55 ... $50,,000. 

n • ;6 - •50,000. 

I. T. McDOHALD 

NJST to S/ASST 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a ---- ---- --- ---------=-~--~-~--~--~----------------------
Doc ID: 4103454
Doc ID: 4103454
Doc ID: 4103454
Doc ID: 4103454
Doc ID: 4103454
Doc ID: 4103454
Doc ID: 4103454
Doc ID: 4103454
Doc ID: 4103454
Doc ID: 4103454
Doc ID: 4103454
Doc ID: 4103454
Doc ID: 4103454
Doc ID: 4103454
Doc ID: 4103454
Doc ID: 4103454
# CE2004084EN.01039901.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/399 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/399

---

(2004/C 84 E/0463)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0437/04

by Michl Ebner (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(18 February 2004)

Subject:   EURO 5

Subject:

In the answer to my Written Questions E-3639/03 (1) and E-3502/03 (1) on pollution in the Wipp and Eisack valleys and air quality standards in areas of heavy traffic, I was referred to Directive 1999/96/EC (2), under which stricter emission limits for new heavy goods vehicles will be introduced in two phases. In the first phase, EURO 4, nitrogen oxide emissions will be reduced by 30 % and particulate emissions by 80 % of current levels from 2006 onwards.

1

1

2

The second phase, EURO 5, which will apply to all new heavy goods vehicles from October 2009, requires a 60 % reduction in nitrogen oxide emissions.

In the light of the danger to the health of residents in areas of heavy traffic, would it not be useful to bring this phase forward, perhaps to 2007, and reduce both nitrogen oxide and particulate emissions much earlier and more drastically?

What is the Commission's view on this?

---

(1)  OJ C 78 E, 27.3.2004.

1

(2)  OJ L 44, 16.2.2000, p. 1.

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000351498
<NAME>                                         US1 INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4354200
<ALLOWANCES>                                   98985
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4514679
<PP&E>                                         12448
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (47312)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4622105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5084040
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    879254
<COMMON>                                       40844297
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4622105
<SALES>                                        23667900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               23667900
<CGS>                                          22974854
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  22974854
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (11291)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (476011)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                228326
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            228326
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   228326
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .016
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 43 (Thursday, March 5, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12055-12056]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05199]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration


Sunshine Act Meetings; Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of 
Directors

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of Directors 
Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TIME AND DATE: The meeting will be held on April 9, 2015, from 12:00 
Noon to 3:00 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time.

PLACE: This meeting will be open to the public via conference call. Any 
interested person may call 1-877-422-1931, passcode 2855443940, to 
listen and participate in this meeting.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board 
of Directors (the Board) will continue its work in developing and 
implementing the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement and to 
that end, may

[[Page 12056]]

consider matters properly before the Board.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Avelino Gutierrez, Chair, Unified 
Carrier Registration Board of Directors at (505) 827-4565.

    Dated: March 2, 2015.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-05199 Filed 3-3-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
Exhibit 23.1


                      ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT



Board of Directors
Gold Banc Corporation, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1994 Key Employee Stock
Option Plan, Incentive Stock Option Plan 1996, 1997 nonqualified
Share option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, and 1999 Stock
Option and Equity Incentive Plan of our report dated February 18,
2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Gold Banc
Corporation, Inc. as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the
related consolidated statements of earnings, cash flows and
stockholders' equity and comprehensive income for each of the
years in the three year period ended December 31, 1999, which
report appears in the 1999 annual report of Form 10-K of Gold
Banc Corporation, Inc. and are incorporated herein by reference




April 4, 2000
Kansas City, Missouri
<PAGE>
aaxii8kex102_7182011.htm


 


EXHIBIT 10.2


 


 


Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC


 







1840 Gateway Drive, Suite 200


Foster City, CA 94404







July 16, 2011







Accelerated Acquisitions XII, Inc.


1840 Gateway Drive, Suite 200


Foster City, CA 94404







Re:           Tender of shares for cancellation







Gentlemen:







By this letter, the undersigned tenders for cancellation 3,500,000 of the 5,000,000 shares of common stock par value $0.0001 of Accelerated Acquisitions, XII, Inc. (the “Company”) which it holds.  Following the cancellation of such shares, Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC will hold a total of 1,500,000 of the Company’s Common Shares.







Sincerely,







ACCELERATED VENTURE PARTNERS, LLC







By:       /s/ Timothy Neher


Timothy Neher, Managing Member
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43104

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

TIMOTHY RAY VOTROUBEK,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 334

Filed: January 21, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Deborah A. Bail, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period 

of confinement of three years, for felony driving under the influence, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Erik R. Lehtinen, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Timothy Ray Votroubek pled guilty to felony driving under the influence. Idaho Code 

§§ 18-8004, 18-8005(9). The district court sentenced Votroubek to a unified term of ten years 

with three years determinate. Votroubek appeals asserting that the district court abused its 

discretion by imposing an excessive sentence.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 
2

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Votroubek’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.