alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004084EN.01041701.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/417 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/417

---

(2004/C 84 E/0487)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0503/04

by Jorge Hernández Mollar (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(23 February 2004)

Subject:   National obstacles to the application of Directive 98/5/EC

Subject:

The adoption of European Parliament and Council Directive 98/5/EC (1) of 16 February 1998, whose purpose was to facilitate the permanent exercise of the profession of lawyer in an EU Member State other than that in which the lawyer had acquired his or her qualifications, aroused great expectations. In many cases these have been severely disappointed.

1

Several Member States have put maximum red tape in the way of the effective application of the Directive, since following transposition into national law, the lawyers' colleges of various countries have raised numerous obstacles to the establishment of lawyers from other Member States, particularly with the excuse that the lawyer does not know the official language of the host country, something which with regard to certain countries, such as Luxembourg, really constitutes a barrier which is extremely difficult to overcome.

Does the Commission believe that the fact that someone does not speak a national language such as Luxembourgish, for example, is a reason for that Member State to refuse to enter a lawyer from another Member State in the country's College of Lawyers?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(5 April 2004)

(5 April 2004)

The lack of knowledge of an official language of the host Member State for the establishment of lawyers under their home-country professional title poses a problem with regard to Directive 98/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 to facilitate practice of the profession of lawyer on a permanent basis in a Member State other than that in which the qualification was obtained. Besides, practise in that State under a home-country professional title ensures that consumers are properly informed (2).

2

In the case of Luxembourg, the Commission asked it so submit its comments on this requirement. Luxembourg's reply is being examined in order to determine what action should be taken in this case. The Commission will certainly inform the Honourable Member of any action taken.

The Commission has no knowledge of similar requirements in other Member States, but is prepared to examine any information the Honourable Member might submit concerning this matter or any other obstacles.

---

(1)  OJ L 77, 14.3.1998, p. 36.

1

(2)  As pointed out in recital 9.

2

---
Mr. J .. M. Scott 

General Electria Appliance Service Center 

5554 Chestnut Street 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

Dear Sir: 

310 Second Street, S.E. 

Waehington 31 D. c. 

8 November 1954 

Noting in the current Saturday Evening Post the GE advertisement ~or 

elect.ric ble.nkets, I am reminded that I have wanted for some days now to 

Wl"ite you, to complain about the extremely unsatisfactory service we have 

had lately f'rom GE blankets. 

When these u.sef'uJ. articles firat ca.me upon the market, we vere among 

the early purchasers o:f two GE blankets--that was back in J.945 or 1946. 

They gave excellent service for at least half' a. dozen years. When de!'ects 

appeared, in 1952, we took them. to the local. GE Appliance Service Center 

where we were advised to turn them. in for new ones. We followed this 

advice, a.t a considerable coat, of course, and got new ones. Within a 

!'ev months, these vent bad, but since the 1-year guarantee had not yet. 

expired, they were replaced without coat to us. One of these is still. 

in service bUt the other one is inoperative (I checked the controller and 

it is in good. order). Upon consul.ting the local GE Appliance Reptir 

Center, I was told that tba.t center no longer handles Jobs of this sort 

and I was reterred to a local. firm named. Leppert. This outfit stated 

that there was nothing they could do except replace the blanket at our 

expense, of course. 

It seems to me that the vecy :t'irst GE blankets and their controllers 

were much better than your newer mod.els, and tba.t GE research and devel.opl:Qent ha.s operated largely to ''im.prove 11 things to their ruination. M:>reover, an article of euch simplicity and relatively high cost a.s an electric 

blanket ahould not have to be thrown away after one of two years' use-.. 

why ahould it be impossible to repair them? To PJ.Y' over f25 each year for 

an electric blanket is certainly unwarranted and if' GE policy from now 

on is goil'.16 to require ouch an &nnua.l expenditure, -we &ball certainly 

stop using GE blankets altogether. 

This lettel' is being written at the suggeation 0£ ;your local Service 

~nter.. I would be glad to have any co1~nts you care to make on my 

complaint. If I do not hear f'rom you soon it will be a oignal for :ioo to 

p.ircha.se some blankets, other than GE herea.t'ter--and tell all my :f":d.end.s. 

Very truly yours, 

WILLIAM F • FRIEJl.fAN 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-09-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a \ 

\
Unassociated Document


     

    Exhibit 10.1

     

    October
3, 2008

     

    Matthew
J. During, MD, DSc

    Professor
and Director

    The Ohio
State University

    BRT 912,
460 West 12th
Street

    Columbus,
OH 43210

     

    Dear Dr.
During:

     

    This
letter (the “Amendment”) amends that certain Consulting Agreement, dated as of
October 1, 1999 (the “Consulting Agreement”), as amended, by letter agreements
dated October 8, 2003, April 30, 2004, June 27, 2006, and October 1, 2007, by and
between Neurologix, Inc. (“Neurologix”), a Delaware corporation and you.
Capitalized terms used herein, but not otherwise defined, shall have the
meanings set forth in the Consulting Agreement.

     

    It is
therefore agreed as follows:

     

    
      	
            	
              1.

            	
              Section
      4 of the Consulting Agreement is amended and restated to read as
      follows:

            


    

    
      	
            	
              4.

            	
              Term
      and Termination.  The term of this Agreement shall end
      on September 30, 2009, unless earlier terminated for cause (including
      breach of any agreement between the parties) by either party upon thirty
      (30) days written notice to the other
party.

            


    

     

    
      	
            	
              2.

            	
              Except
      as amended above by this Amendment, all of your and Neurologix’s
      respective rights and obligations under the Consulting Agreement and the
      related Confidentiality, Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement,
      dated as of October 1, 1999, between yourself and Neurologix, shall be
      deemed preserved by this Amendment, without modification or
      reduction.

            


    

     

    
      	
            	
              3.

            	
              This
      Amendment shall be governed by, and construed pursuant to, the laws of the
      State of New York applicable to agreements made and to be performed wholly
      within such State.

            


    

     

     

    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date
first written above.  This Amendment may be executed in counterparts.

     

    Very
truly yours,

     

    NEUROLOGIX,
INC.

     

    
      
        	 	 	 
	
                By:
      

              	/s/ John
      E. Mordock	 
	 	John
      E. Mordock	 
	 	      
                President
      & Chief Executive Officer

              	 
	 	 	 


      

    

     

     

    ACCEPTED
AND AGREED:

    
       

      
        
          	 	 
	/s/ Matthew During	 
	Dr.
      Matthew During
-~-- -i ......_....._: - ... . - ~. 

~~~ '~~~ ! r 7 

;.-- ' - - '-i; 

-- - - --- ,.J 'r ' . ;_ •-.\ 

- L ............ .,;. • 

"- - - • r • r-- :------~.:--~- ...... 

Iii· -

-

-~:r-t -

r---

~-

-

Jr&Jor 0..ral r ••• tn1n& 

"'P•tlnf.eD:lalt 

IM!lq~, u. $• P!1llta%7 .A.q'1d8Q" 

lfMt, ~t_, 1.w York 

'· tn aceoroance vlth th• req-i.iest contained in J'0\12" letter ot --~ Mrch 195'2, Mr. V'lHam P. Prledaan.. Cclhaultant t.o t.he Dil"ector, 

Aimed J'OJ"Ce8 r;-ecur1t7 !pncy, ba' best •uthorized to prQCeGd to tbe 

Unlted states Mlltt.ar.v Aeuadmy, w .. t. ?oln\1 Ww York on or .tout 

11 kY .U~1 tor t.he ~!OU• at dalinr~ a J.ect.lJt"e to cadet.a or · - the~ci;i, liii! t.Q owtain rli'1cers ot the liSMA Stilt u4 

- l~f.¥1 Cll H~ a.rd 29 M.q l9S2. 

- -I. )ht haa_~~ ~ a..ithorl.secl t.o co==in!cato dJ.nctl)t lid.th 

19'1 a t6 \ho -utli &ti! conUir.A ot-f:ie l41Ct.ill"G, whidl will bo within 

.filMltaf.I_~ ~~ed 1n par~i'hs 2 and 4 ot 70Ul' letter. 

Pc& mi DtRECTf•fis 

; -- ·-
POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints each of Robert K. Kretzman and Michael T. Sheehan or any of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the REVLON, INC. (the ‘‘Corporation’’) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the ‘‘Form 10-K’’) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any applicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents 13th day of March,  2007.

|        |  |  |                  |
|--------|--|--|------------------|
| /S/    |  |  | ALAN S. BERNIKOW |
|   |  |  | ALAN S. BERNIKOW |
|        |

----
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-11221

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RONALD HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:09-CR-72-1

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Ronald Hernandez raises

arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 586 F.3d 303,

308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 1920 (2010), which reaffirmed the

holding in United States v. Gamez-Gonzalez, 319 F.3d 695, 700 (5th Cir. 2003),

that knowledge of drug type and quantity is not an element of the offense under

21 U.S.C. § 841. He also raises arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by

United States v. Brown, 920 F.2d 1212, 1216-17 (5th Cir. 1991), abrogated on

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 19, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-11221 Document: 00511450550 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/19/2011
No. 09-11221

other grounds by United States v. Candia, 454 F.3d 468, 472-73 (5th Cir. 2006),

which held that a district court may order a term of imprisonment to run

consecutively with an unimposed state sentence. Finally, Hernandez raises

arguments that he acknowledges are foreclosed by United States v. London, 568

F.3d 553, 564 (5th Cir. 2009), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 631 (2010). The Supreme

Court adopted the position advanced in London. See Abbott v. United States, 131

S. Ct. 18, 23 (2010) (holding that a defendant is subject to a mandatory,

consecutive sentence for a conviction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) even if the

defendant received a higher mandatory minimum on a different count of

conviction).

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its

alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 09-11221 Document: 00511450550 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/19/2011
Exhibit24.9

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appointseach of Robert K. Kretzman and Michael T. Sheehan or either of them,each acting alone, her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, withfull power of substitution, for her and her name, place and stead, inany and all capacities, in connection with the REVLON, INC. (the"Corporation") Annual Report on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Form10-K") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing,to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation oron behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of theCorporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument,contract, document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibitsthereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including thispower of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and anyapplicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body,granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone,full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thingrequisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fullyto all intents and purposes as she might or could do in person, herebyratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents,each acting alone, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do orcause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has signed these presents this 18th day ofFebruary, 2004.

|  | /s/ MARTHA STEWART |
|--|--------------------|

|  |
|--|
|  |  |  |
|  |

|  | MARTHASTEWART |
|--|---------------|

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          14,641
<SECURITIES>                                    17,659
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,468
<INVENTORY>                                     18,238
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,871
<PP&E>                                           7,737
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,489)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  96,943
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,898
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            72
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,229
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    96,943
<SALES>                                         88,815
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                88,815
<CGS>                                           51,478
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   98,473
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,643
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,058)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,404)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,654)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,654)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.49)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 10497)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Eye Institute Special Emphasis Panel, NEI Secondary Data Analysis (R21) Grant Applications.                    

*Date:*                         March 18, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         2:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Health,  5635 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20892,  (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Brian Hoshaw, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Division of Extramural Research, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, Rockville, MD 20892, 301-451-2020,                         *hoshawb@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 20, 2015.

Melanie J. Gray, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-03937 Filed 2-25-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
REF ID:A64940 

Bequest for 1'.r:'a.vel and Service ar JSA Consultant 

8/.ABST. (Mr. J'riednan) l.3 J'uly 1954 ~t. I.!l!. J(c])onald. 

CIJ493/ean 

l. Xil. accordance with the nevl¥ eatablished procedures concerning tho 

adm1n1stra.t1on ot consuitants, the rol.l..awing 1a aUbmitted.1 I/ 

a. A#:nr:t element :requesting the eeniees 

B.ucutive Secretary, IBASAB. 

b. !lame or individual requested; 

l>r. ISelmlel S. Wilks. 

c. lla.tes otl Vh!eh the ee:tVice1 a.re :reqU.1.red.t 

31 August 19~ - 3 Septexziber 1954 aXJd. 9 ~tem.ber 1954~ 

d.. .Approximate nun:iber or~ the aervicee Yill be l'OQ.UiX'Cd.1 

81& (6) 

•· ~osed rate ar pa.yi $50.00 

r. JU.8810.ll 'to be accQq)l1ehecls 

It a :requested. tba.t Dr. Wilks r'J:f to England via MATS on 

31 August 1954 to viait GCIQ tar the period l.·3 September 1954. 

Dr .. Wilks ill to Jlllke the viait a.a • mmber or the JBASAB ~or 

larief'il3ga and diacWlaiona on SA •ttera. l'r02a Xngland, DJ.". 

Yilka i• to attend, at hia own expenae, the Me.them.tic& Co.ngreas 

12' Amsterdam. Be ia to return to Washington ham lng1 and vi& 

*TS on. 11 Septembel" l,9,5lt.. 

g.. :or .. Wilks 1a :personally kl30Vn to -perso~l at this office. 

h. Xtt-. Wllka has been ~ontactecl by this ottice in regard to thia 

l'l"OPo$ed 'Yisit. It baa been d1acuaaed intcmnally at varioua 

times, both ill ccmveraation and in correspondence, d:Llrtng the 

P1J1t aeven.J. *1l'Ith8. b proposed trip 1*a the concurrence 

ot the SWU>, the Executive Secreta.l'y at EASA'B, twtJ. the 

llirector, IS.A. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-17-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
REF ID:A64940 

2. It ils :req,uersted. that the necessary ardera be u.-ued to nt. Wilka 

authorising travel h'om :Princeton, K.J.; to Washington, D.c. by rail, from 

\laehillgton to Faria, J'ra.nce, by MA1S, a.n5. trom Peri• to l<>ndon by cQlliml."1eal. 

-.1r and i'Ot\tt"ll to Princeton. It is requested. that e.rrangementa be l1ILde tor 

Jlr. Wilks to leave Wwshington, u. c. on the 31 ~t MATS tliaht and that a 

:request bft me.d.e tor a. ~iorlty on the ll Septenber nturn MA!m t'l.1$ht trom 

Pe.ri#. It u intended. that the travel and. per diem author1r.at1on include only 

the travel to and. trom acBQ and the till!e -.pent there, not the period during 

'Which DJ:-. Vil.ks Yill be attending the Matheioo.tic• ~erence a.t Nnsterda.m. 

3. A eelt'-aplanatory ietter in regard to nr. Vilka' passport, .edicaJ. 

oxanrlnation, i1mun1116tion shot.,, and travel i• a:tt.aehed ror )'Our intorxiation. 

-....... ____ ..._ ____ ~~ 

wn.xJAM r ~ nm:tMAN 

&l_peaia.l Anitlt&nt 

-· ~---- ·~---