alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,422,357
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,349,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             7,015,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 17,668,425
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         747,530
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           752,710
<LOANS>                                    123,026,386
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,983,211
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             163,254,796
<DEPOSITS>                                 143,484,922
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,443,804
<LONG-TERM>                                  3,284,216
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       399,500
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,643,354
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             163,254,796
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,157,899
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              815,473
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                58,843
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,032,215
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,930,533
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,049,414
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,982,801
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  50
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,356,867
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,568,857
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,093,187
<EPS-BASIC>                                     2.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.74
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                    913,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   182,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,970,620
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  205,976
<RECOVERIES>                                    68,567
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,983,211
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES L. FLOWERS, JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 189 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Review and the 

Application for Relief are DENIED.
1

The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-2140

___________

Michael L. Fogle, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Alan Blake, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: July 2, 2007

Filed: July 10, 2007

___________

Before RILEY, MAGILL, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Michael Fogle (Fogle), a civilly committed resident of the Missouri Sexual

Offender Treatment Center (MSOTC), appeals the district court’s1

 pre-service

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Fogle’s complaint alleged his constitutional

rights had been violated because the MSOTC denied Fogle the use of a typewriter or

computer as medically recommended relief from handwriting. The district court

dismissed the complaint pre-service pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), for being

legally frivolous or for failing to state a claim. 
-2-

Upon de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000)

(per curiam), we conclude that dismissal was proper, notwithstanding the liberal

standard applied to pro se complaints, see Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir.

2004) (explaining pro se complaints are to be construed liberally but must allege

sufficient facts to support claims). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district

court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      11,966,000
<SECURITIES>                                 6,486,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,460,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,788,000
<PP&E>                                      72,084,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (31,617,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              67,255,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          981,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,802,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  61,661,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                67,255,000
<SALES>                                     14,071,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,071,000
<CGS>                                       18,190,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,190,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,691,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,256,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,435,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,435,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.45)
        

</TABLE>
U.S. Deportment 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

SEP 0 l 2015 

Ms. Patricia Apone 

Office of Airport Safety and Standards 

Director, Horry County Department 

of Airports 

1100 Jetport Road 

Myrtle Beach, SC 29577 

Dear Ms. Apone: 

800 Independence Ave., SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

We are writing to express our concerns about the safety of skydiving operations at the Grand 

Stands Airport (CRE). Between March 2013 and August 2015, the FAA Air Traffic Control 

Tower (ATCT) and the Horry County Department of Airports (HCDA), in South Carolina have 

reported approximately 91 safety incidents involving skydiving operations at the Airport. 

These incidents involving Vehicle Pedestrian Deviations, Major Occurrence Reports, and 

Unusual Incident Reports bring into question Horry County's current compliance with its 

obligation to operate CRE in a safe manner, which includes the Drop Zone (DZ) on airport 

property. 

As you know, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is currently reviewing a 

14 CFR Part 16 Complaint filed by Skydive Myrtle Beach, Inc. (Complainant) against HCDA, 

South Carolina, under FAA Docket No. 16-14-05. The pleadings in the Part 16 complaint raise 

the question of whether the County should restrict skydiving operations to assure safe 

operations of CRE and exercise greater control of the airport to preclude unsafe conditions. 

While the issues raised by the pleadings are being addressed in the current FAA investigation, 

and are not being prejudged by this letter, the FAA urges CRE to consider whether immediate 

steps should be taken to mitigate unsafe skydiving practices at CRE and the risks imposed upon 

other airport users, within the context of overall airfield safety. 

These safety incidents may be indicative of serious systemic safety issues involving skydiving 

operations (e.g., landings outside of the Drop Zone) at CRE. You should give serious 

consideration to mitigation measures such as better coordination with the A TCT because they 

may constitute unacceptable risks at the Airport. From a safety and compliance perspective, we 

strongly encourage the County to use its authority to ensure safe on-airport skydiving landings, 

to include the DZ. 
2 

The FAA's Airports (ARP), Air Traffic Organization (ATO), and Flight Standards (AFS) 

offices stand ready to assist in identifying appropriate risk mitigation measures. Please let me 

know if I can be of assistance in answering any questions you may have. t 

Michael J. O'D ell, A.A.E. 

Director of Airport Safety 

and Standards
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03097**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  03097\03097_ Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 03097\03097_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 03097\03097_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook x 03097\03097_Followup Response1_MM.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up x 03097\03097_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03097\03097_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03097\03097_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03097\03097_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03097\03097_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03097\03097_telecon1.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response x 03097\03097_telecon2.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

03097\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\20100913 Weston Effluent Guidelines Certification.pdf Plant certification statement

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Riggs National
Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Steven T. Tamburo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                         
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|
| | (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/ Steven T. Tamburo

Name: Steven T. Tamburo
Chief Financial Officer
May 14, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

33
USCIB: 14.1/41 111\m>:E.ii T.."IA QQHIN'l' 911AmlELS ON:E.¥ 

18 May 1955 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIBEC: 

Subject: Revision of Appendix 11J'' to the UK.USA Agreement. 

Reference: USCIB 14.1/40 of 27 April 1955. 

1. Vote sheet response to the reference indicates a desire on the 

part of several members for discussion. 

2. Except for the following comments all members approved: 

CIA: 

111. It is recommended that LSIB be informed that in approving 

Appendix J and Annexure J 1, and, specifical~, the possibility of 

establishing the liaison officer now accredited to DSB as the 'senior 

U. S. representative for conducting liaispp with Australia and New 

Zealand •••• on matters pertaining to COMINT,' it is understood that 

such liaison in no way infringes upon existing or future intelligence 

liaison with intelligence agencies of the Australian or New Zealand 

Governements on a COMINT-cleared basis. 

"2. With regard to the additional request contained in pa •. l.-

graphs 6-S of LSIB camnunication, CIA would appreciate further clarification." 

STATE: 

"The Department approves the proposed revision of Appendix J, 

its Annexure Jl and the two proposals contained in paragraphs 2 and 3 

of the letter of 1$ April 1955 from the Secretary of LSIB. 

"It is requested that, prior to accepting the proposal contained in paragraph S of that letter, it be discussed at an early Board 

meeting." 

NSA: 

"a. NSA approves the draft Appendix 1 J 1 and Annexure 'Jl 1 to 

the UKUSA Agreement provided the following editorial correction is made: 

Appendix 'JI, paragraph a,. 1st sentence: change the '5' 

at the end of 3rd line to 171 , which then will read 1 ••• Agreement and or 

para. 7 of Appendix E thereto.' 

USCIB: 14.1/41 IIJcNBfiEi 1v'IA 60MIN'i' 6H-ANNEbS O!U.1¥ 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-25-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

TOP SECRE't' 

24 
USCIB: 14.1/41 

'fOP ffi!iORm 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

P4 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Subject: Revision of Appendix. 11 J 11 to the UKUSA Agreement. 

-------------------------------------

USCIB: 14.1/41 - 2 -

TOP SECRET 
• I t oJ 

USCIB: 14.1/41 

'POP ffi!ieRBi' 

• ~188 • 

Subject: Revision of Appendix "J 11 to the UKUSA Agreement. 

4. In order to clarify the issue and to formulate recommendations 

as to an approprlate response to this request, this matter will be placed 

on the agenda for discussion at the next regular meeting of USCIBEC. 

USCIB: U,.1/41 - .'.3 -

TOP SECRET
# CE2004088EN.01025201.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/252 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/252

---

(2004/C 88 E/0257)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0940/04

by Robert Evans (PSE) to the Commission

(26 March 2004)

Subject:   Churches in Indonesia

Subject:

I have received several letters from constituents regarding Reverend Rinaldy Damanik, a leader of the Protestant Christian Community in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Has the Commission any further information on his situation to add to the response that it gave to Written Question E-2815/03 (1) in October 2003?

1

Is the Commission also aware of the recent closure of several churches in Indonesia and the lack of resolution of the enforced conversion of thousands of Christians to Islam during the sectarian conflict in the Molucca Islands? Is the Commission making representations to encourage the Indonesian Government to put an end to these and other examples of the persecution of Christians in Indonesia?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(23 April 2004)

(23 April 2004)

The Commission is still following the case of Reverend Damanik whose sentence to three years imprisonment for illegal possession of weapons was confirmed by the Supreme Court at the end of 2003. Since Reverend Damanik has already spent more than one-and-a-half years in prison, there is a possibility of an earlier release.

The Commission Delegation in Jakarta has contacted the human rights non-governmental organisation (NGO), linked to the Indonesian Church, which has taken over the assistance to Reverend Damanik after the sentence of the highest court, and was informed that they are assessing the feasibility of starting a new case, with new evidence/witnesses.

As regards the areas with a high level of religious tensions, the Commission is encouraged by information, received from local religious groups, that inter-faith groups are set up aiming at co-operation and reciprocal protection and defence. The Commission has recently received one of these inter-faith groups active in the Maluku Province.

The Commission is closely monitoring the situation of religious freedom in Indonesia. Moreover, support to organisations defending minority rights in Indonesia is part of the Community's co-operation programme with the country, in particular through projects supported under the European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights.

---

(1)  See page 117.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)

I, Seth L. Van Voorhees, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of American Pacific Corporation (the “Company”), certify that to the best of my knowledge: 

     (i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q dated May 12, 2004 for the period ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

      (ii) the information contained in the said Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|   | /s/  SETH L. VAN   VOORHEES |
|--------|----------------------------------|
|   |                                  |
|   | **Seth L.   Van Voorhees**       |
|   | **Chief   Financial Officer**    |
|   |                             |
|   | May 12, 2004                     |

**-32.2-**
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RAYMOND SORIA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2024-0632

[July 3, 2024]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.853 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Scott Suskauer, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 501997CF005869.

Raymond Soria, Bushnell, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
REF ID:A275345 

To ~.fr. Wm. I'riadman, 

War Depa.rtwent 1 

WASIIT:TG'l'ON o 

Dear Friedman, 

This is to introduce Squadron Leader Carce 

who is going to Washington f'or an unspecified time. He has 

worked in the Air ;.!inJ.stry purely on the compil.a. tion sideo 

That branch of the Air .inistry are all 

fairly new, bt..t they seem to have acquired a f'air g:t:'j...f> of' 

their JOba At the same time I am certain that Carce would 

be receptive of' 8.I1if help or criticiBI!l :f'rQ~ a new angle. 

At what stage of' the proceedings we shall be 

-"'--able to send over so"neone eqw.valent f'rom the War Of'f'ice I do 

not-kiiowa 

Lieut.Ool.J.rt. ~iltman1 Cdg.:!Jo.4 IoSo, 

c/o. !.I.I.8, 

The l'far Of'f'ice1 

LONDO?T. S W. l. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-15-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
f-

~­r:- . ,._.,. 

CAU3ES OP SEPARATIOK 

· · · ltea:lgaed 55S 

:a.moved for p'to-aieal d1aabilit,' 16 

Removed tor i:msat1efaoto17 ebaracter investi£ation 

.lemoved for other reaecma 

!ransterre4 

48 • 

1'1 ·~Lett without antering ·rt ... - 9 

·-' ~-

' .. . " - -

Jte~decl tul.l amount. or transp0rtation '85 

letunding transportation 22 

llequesting retunds ?8 - ~nsportation not collected 64. _ J'orwa~e4 for tarther a ctioa , 0 

649 .. _~ - ,,...... .. :. 

.. 

.. .J ~. - ... -

;. -- .. '::. 

@'pproved fo'r Releas~ by NSA on 04-07-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

1' 

1 

0 

0 

0 

Q 

2 

1 

0 

0 

1 

0 

2 

~--

556 

1'1 

• 48 

17 

·&5i 

__ 

-·-

_;c._ 

-~---EL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VOYAGER.NET,
INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          17,722
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,480
<ALLOWANCES>                                       651
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,046
<PP&E>                                          24,442
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,218
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,365
<BONDS>                                          1,843
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,010
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,221
<SALES>                                         31,524
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,138
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,249
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,002
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,113)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,113)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,113)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.45)


</TABLE>