alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofIteris, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedDecember 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Jack Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        |   | /s/ JACK JOHNSON        |   |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |   | Jack Johnson            |   |   |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
|   |   |                    |   |   |
|   |   | February 12, 2007       |   |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or any other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 32.2
                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      I, Henry Lo, Chief Financial Officer of Biofarm, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certify to my knowledge that:

      (1)   The Company's annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
            October 31, 2004 (the "Form 10-KSB") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
            1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


BIOFARM, INC.                         /s/ Henry Lo
                                      -----------------------------------
(Registrant)                          Henry Lo
                                      Chief Financial Officer

Dated:   February 14, 2005




                                        5
1 NAME OR TITLE INITIALS 

DATE 

z 

3 

4 

FROM NAME oRTITLE'~ ( (J.Jl\.) DATE 

CIRCULATE 

COORDINATION 

FILE 

INFORMATION 

NECESSARY ACTION 

NOTE AND 

RETURN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

---- ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION TELEPHONE 

ro ed fo Rele se b NSA on 04-02-2014 ursuantto E.O. 13 

DD FORM 9 5 Re11lul'I•• DA AOO i.·urm 89.;, I ~ 11r 4K 111<1 Ab'RQ .. GPO "". 0 '"'"' 1 FEB 50 Form 12, 10 ll:'ov 4i, '1.h1ch may bl? used. 
·e --- ------ ----------
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1
 
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of Cambridge Heart, Inc. of our report dated February
10, 1999 appearing on page 22 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1998.
 
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
Boston, Massachusetts
March 31, 1999
Docket Number FAA-2013-0700

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

Transport Canada Robert Farinas

(613) 952-4428

05/23/13 No Objections

Bombardier

Aerospace

Chester Liburski

(514) 855-5001

X 29036

05/23/13 No Objections

RAA Scott Foose

(202) 367-1212

05/23/13 N/A
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.3
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
Accipiter, Inc.:

We consent to the inclusion of our report on Accipiter, Inc. dated March 26,
1998 in the prospectus constituting part of this Registration Statement on
Form S-1 of Engage Technologies, Inc. and to the reference to our firm under
the heading "Experts" in the prospectus.


/s/ KPMG LLP
KPMG LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina

July 19, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       9
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           32,040
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 32,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                      0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     189,807
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           22,424
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             22,803
<LOANS>                                         658,803
<ALLOWANCE>                                      12,773
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  957,559
<DEPOSITS>                                      828,940
<SHORT-TERM>                                      3,918
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              13,581
<LONG-TERM>                                      25,910
<COMMON>                                         32,113
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                       53,097
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  957,559
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  14,598
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 3,335
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    368
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 18,301
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                7,478
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                7,920
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            10,381 
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       360
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                    0 
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   7,694
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4,033
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        4,033
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2,682
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     4.83
<LOANS-NON>                                       4,692
<LOANS-PAST>                                        994
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    132
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                       0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 12,393
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       477
<RECOVERIES>                                        497
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                12,773
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          12,773
        



</TABLE>
REF ID:A67784 

RESfRIGJ .. i- SEc.-r.tiY-IW&RMAllaH · 

1, 

~ ,,,,,~ '0 

SQ~QQS~ 

llEll>RANDtr.l FOR 1U atIEP. SECURM OCllTROL nIVIBIOH 

SUBJEOT 1 Additianal Clearances ~or Advieo17 Board 

9 l'JeOenber 1952 

l. It 18 requested that. tull COYINT olearanca be obt.ained if 

possible tor the follaid.ng nominees tor the Board1 

a. &IOSTROll, Dr. Elmer We 

D.O.B,. - 2S August 1901 

:r.o.n. - 11!.nneapolis, llinnesota 

IClrEt Dr. Enpt.rom 1e Vice Pruident-1n-Charge - RDA 

Laboratories 'Di.VS.aim, Princeton, Hew Jene7. 

He 18 ourrentl.7 a mem.bor ~ tl1e Reae.!rCh and 

Dlmllopment Doan! Caamitteo on JQ.ectronic•• la 

wah mem,..~r I believe that 70U wt'll t!.nd that 

be already has •TO? SECBET olearance. 

be 8.IJIJEL1 Arthur, .Dr. 

D.O.B. - S 'December l.901 

P .o.D. - Jmpor1a, lmeaa 

1orE1 Dr. Samel 1• curr91tl.y Oha.1rmsn or RDB P111J.el ca 

electrordo tubes. Be i• empla,ed at il.eotronio 

Laboratories. Pl.mt Mo. 2, International Bwrinees 

Machines Corporaticn, Poughkeepsie, 'Rn York. Be 

probably' already has a TO~> S!CRET clearance. 

e. SHOC.KL!T, nr. ftlli&11 B. 

D.O.B. - 13 Februar.r 1910 

P.,o.B. - London,, Qigland 

llO?lh nr. Shockl.Q' ia now an Amorican dt1zen, having oom 

to the u.s. in 1913. Be ia current~ emplo;red at 

the Ball Telephone Laboratories, In Iork. 

2. Please pro"t'ide sne with whatever additim!ll form aq be required 

to be completed 'bJ' these candidates. 

m..LI !Ji :F • FRll.Ull'1'f 

Conault.:mt. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 08-18-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

CONFIDENTIAi;. 

.:ftf:SlRlQli;;B 6'1M 

1 F j)u"' "S-3
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 29, 2016

Order 

Clerk

April 29, 2016

151277(88)

ROBERT ARBUCKLE, Personal Representative

of the Estate of CLIFTON M. ARBUCKLE, Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 151277

v COA: 310611

MCAC: 11-000043

GENERAL MOTORS, LLC,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion for the temporary admission of out-ofstate attorney Kim F. Ebert to appear and practice on behalf of defendant-appellant under 

MCR 8.126(A) is GRANTED.
#### Madera, Appellant, *v.*Satellite Shelters, Inc. et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *Madera v. Satellite Shelters, Inc.*(1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 1202.]

(No. 98-1927

Submitted May 26, 1999

Decided July 7, 1999.)

*Dolatowski & Campbell Co., L.P.A.,*and *Robert B. Campbell,*for appellant.

*Belkin, Billick & Harrold Co., L.P.A., Linda Hauserman Harrold*and *Lester W. Armstrong; Littler Mendelson, P.C., Marko J. Mrkonich*and *Ingrid M. Kreuser,*for appellees.

*Louis A. Jacobs; Law Offices of John S. Marshall*and *Joshua J. Morrow,*urging reversal for *amici curiae,*Ohio Employment Lawyers Association, Committee Against Sexual Harassment, Ohio Civil Rights Coalition, and Now Education *&*Legal Fund.

This cause is dismissed, *sua sponte,*as having been improvidently allowed.

*1203The court orders that the court of appeals’ opinion not be published in the Ohio Official Reports and that it may not be cited as authority except by the parties *inter se.*

Moyer, C.J., F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent.

Pfeifer, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Alice Robie Resnick, J.,

dissenting. This case contains important issues and should be addressed on the merits. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s determination to dismiss as improvidently allowed.

Douglas, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  OF EPOCH HOLDING CORPORATION

I,
William W. Priest, certify that:

(1)   I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Epoch Holding Corporation (the "Registrant");

(2)   Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)   The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



(5)   The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: February 3, 2011

By:

/s/ WILLIAM W. PRIEST William W. Priest Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6619** 

ANTWOINE JONES , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v.
WARDEN KELLY , Respondent

– Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Vi rginia , at Roanoke
. Samuel G. Wilson , District Judge. ( 7:09

- cv - 00185

- SGW

- MFU )

Submitted : February 4, 2011 Decided: February 1 4 , 2011

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per cu riam opinion
. Antwoine Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory William Franklin, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Antwoine Jones seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificate of appeala bility will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural
g rounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record

a nd conclude that Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We grant Jones’ motion to expand the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions a re adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSE D
Den,r t~lizeheth n.nrl Hill: 

REF ID:A22632r61 

L.n:r, Areil 91. ('J. 

i-ln.ny t 11:mks fnr the ln Lter. J\.nrl i [, was finn to lwnr .rn11r 

voice's ln.<;t 11i~:l1t, ;v-licn .'""ll. c;' Llccl us 11'.)· 

We ;.ccre very invmy l,o l•·:i.rn tl1:i.t ·.'"ou will cnme to ::iwit.zorland 

soor1, :rnd thf1.t T,rc shall hrtv8 th0. "·:,Hietm1ity of secin,r:, riu'i.te 

n, lot cnch rj tlHff. 

_,_, .. ...-·'\1ow w.i. '[,Ji r8 ·:·1 1:d lo l:oto 1 roo1·;s: 

In 6iirich tile 0t.n:rcl1c11 w:cs J,ool:;ccl S'Jlicl .for ti10 ti: 1e indic:-i'tcd 

hy yri11. '«ie lt<r,re :rc~er, l~d ~L rp1i_p l; rc.•om v:i. tli :.~n.th ::>:t l',}11') llrYL.cl 

H.igihof. l'liis is so1new:1:t·L sirr11)lcr tJ,nn the ::iLorchon, l.n.~L ,:till 

n. r;oorl. iwi0 1 - we h:i:vs our •'lves st:1yec1 t.licro l;pl~orr:- 1·:c c;•1:c to 

Ziir;. It is located 011 t!u~ Unirorsit:it.s~;Lrn.sse, on Ll:'.' otlu~r si·~0 

of thr? Liuw1:1t river, :1.g,1_ hi:.;hcr ·up. 

Jlcre in .lug yuu cim h:-ivc a rnrn;1 :m·.1_ htth rlt ·t;he ito' ·.~nhcrr,, i11 

their 110w 110·:.:;0. '.i.'i1j_;, is ')Uitr; 11odrn:n, ~.1•d I n;ci s11rn tlin:L .~rou 

wilJ. li!1e it. '1\'ill j'<nl ._.11~:t:~C 11~-lj 1'18 ]\HOW F'.,S S"'ln rtS pos::;il>J.8' 

for which rJ n'Lc you wnnt this rr1om. 

I lrnve told tlw llirriJwf that .-.'ntt wi.ll sfo.,:,r for n.t lnn~d; 3 (hfs, 

lmt ev-entun,Lly \l'.) to n, -..rcc:q -a to l~r;r;r,ni'1)r1; I s:d.l thri.+, you 

1:1id1t co;rw on the 6th of L:.:;r or a few ch~·s 1:-i tcr. 'Jhc:- wi.ll of 

CUlll'Se need t:w CXfLCt ,J,;,to S'1·~''• 

.ic .. Jir:l not 11 !'J':'!r ~,.-1;11 11, ronr•1 at ·Lb" J!otol La;~t~lin, 1"..S h"C :f1~lt 

t:;:1.l. y•m pr<~fG1Tccl to he Y<-'1.tr 01m lll:~:,i;crs. l\1rt, FP. tr11°'t t'.1n.t 

· '~ ;';!1,1 ll sue~ ii lo·t ol' '! ch o-t..J~r~r, ;i,nrl tl1;1t '"" mi.•;lrL :·1.l::;ri h·· r.blc 

to 1·mke some tri vs. 

Hopin,'l'. to hr:;:\r from you snou !/l..iJJ, n.ml with 1Jn:;d, rep:arcls fro111 

ho-Lh of us, I remain 

,\.f t'cctiono. ~·~l,y 

c---

~ r~ 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 08-05-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
REF ID:A54266 

SE€RET 

DIGEST OF THE DIRECTOR'S 

STAFF CONFERENCE 

ll JAN. 1955 

TO: Chiefs of Offices and Staff Divisions 

FROM: Chief of Staff 

1. CHIEF OF STAFF 

a. Announced the forthcoming visit of Mr. Robert B. An~erson, 

Deputy Secretary of Defense, on Wednesday, 19 January. Staff Divisions 

to be visited will be notified. 

b. Reminded all Starr Divisions Chiefs of the importance of 

timely submission of 1957 Programs. There may be extenuating circumstances 

which require additional time. In some cases, requests for extension of 

time will be granted; however, it :l.s expected that schedules will be met. 

2. SPECIAL ASSISTANT (Mr. F'riedman) 

Announced the appointment of Dr. .G. Suits, Vice President 

and Director of Research, General Electric Co., to the Electronics Panel 

of the Scientific Advisory Board. 

3. COMPTROLLER 

Stated that under provisions of Section 6331 of Internal Revenue 

Code of 1954, all property and rights to property, including salaries and 

wages of officers and employees of the U.S. Government, including all 

members of Armed Forces active and retired, will be subject to levy and 

distraint by Internal Revenue Service on or after 1 January 1955 for any 

delinquent Federal taxes. 

4. GENERAL COUNSEL 

Annou~ced that Section 21 of the Internal Security Act gives 

Physical Security Regulations full force of the law. Anyone who 

violates physical security regulations will be guilty of a misdemeanor 

and subject to a year in prison and $5000 fine. 

5. DIRECTOR 

"A word about plans and programs: Everyone has to do some 

planning; once you have a program, you have to convert it so that the 

operational people will know something about it. In order to achieve 

successful plans and programs, you must have trained people who can 

come up with complete, accurate plans. It is up to you to train your 

SECRET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-28-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
REF ID:A5426a 

SE€RET • 

subordinates; we have a lot of fine 0people who can be develoPed. The 

test of a good executive is how well he delegates jobs to other people. 

In general, the way he wants things done in the long run must conform 

to what his boss wants. 

"We haven't been too good in our programming in the past; it's 

up to you to develop your plans. It you will do this, 95~ of your '1ob 

will be taken care or. From time to time, I will be coming around to 

visit w1 th yau and I will expect to see your program people. Be ready 

for me." 

• J.Ct~,_J ~or, 

Assistan to the C/S 

NOTE: The Director's Staff Meeting will be held on Tuesday, 18 January, 

at 0830. Secretary Anderson's visit has been changed to Wednesday, 19 January. 

SE€RE'F
Petition for Exemption

Raul F Negrete

104 Racing Media

834 W Holly Dr

Yuma, AZ 85364

I, Raul F Negrete, hereby submit this petition for exemption under Section 333; FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Public Law 112-95 FEB. 14, 2012, Section 333.

I request this exemption in order to operate my UAV/UAS, 3D Robotics Iris+ Quad 

copter Aircraft, in order to provide services for profit to include aerial photography, aerial 

cinematography, aerial filming and photography for real estate, construction firms, aerial 

mapping, special events to include but not limited to weddings, private or public 

parties/events, business advertising, promotional events, geological surveying, and 

environmental studies.

The ability to provide these services to other local businesses and individuals in my 

community will benefit them by opening up opportunities they otherwise did not have 

before. Traditional methods of aerial photography/videography are simply not viable 

options for the average consumer as they are costly and involve greater risks to everyone 

involved; i.e. the use of larger aircraft carrying humans and flammable fuel. By utilizing 

the UAV/UAS the same results can be achieved with much safer conditions.

Prior to each flight/operation of the UAV/UAS, I will conduct a Pre-Flight Safety 

Inspection. 

Only the manufacturers authorized repair facilities/ providers will perform any and all 

repairs. Flights will not take place over densely populated areas or private property 

without the owner’s permission. The UAV/UAS will only be operated within visual line 

of sight and will not be flown near airports or above 400 feet. The FAA can be confident 

that operations of this UAV/UAS will achieve at least the equivalent or greater level of 

safety.

The requests of this petition are similar to those of Mr. Todd Thomas Drone Pics, and 

Mr. Mike Lloyd & Associates, all of who have received Section 333 exemptions for 

comparable aircraft for similar operations.

The specific sections of 14 C.F.R from which I am seeking exemption are as follows:

14 C.F.R. Part 21;

14 C.F.R. 45.23(b);

14 C.F.R. 61.101(e)(4), & (5);

14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) & (b);

14 C.F.R. 61.133 (a);

14 C.F.R. 61.23(a) & (c);

14 C.F.R 91.7(a)

14 C.F.R. 91.9(b)(2);

14C.F.R. 91.109(a);
14 C.F.R. 91.119;

14 C.F.R. 91.121;

14 C.F.R. 91.151(a);

14 C.F.R. 91.203(a) & (b);

14 C.F.R. 91.405(a);

14 C.F.R. 91.407(a)(1);

14 C.F.R. 91.409(a)(2};

14 C.F.R. 91.417(a) & (b).

Please find the included User Manual, Preflight Check List and Flight Safety Guidelines

I truly thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Raul F. Negrete

104 Racing Media

https://3drobotics.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/IRIS-Plus-Operation-Manual-vH-web.pdf

https://3drobotics.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/IRIS-Plus-Flight-Checklist-vB.pdf

https://3drobotics.com/kb/safety/