alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004084EN.01062601.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/626 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/626

---

(2004/C 84 E/0699)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0551/04

by Proinsias De Rossa (PSE) to the Commission

(26 February 2004)

Subject:   Implementation of the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive in Ireland

Subject:

What reply has the Commission received from the Irish Government in response to the reasoned opinion that it sent to Ireland in July 2003, as announced in Commission press release IP/03/1070, regarding the failure of Irish legislation to take sufficient account of sensitive sites or of the cumulative effects of smaller individual projects which, when added together, have a significant impact within the meaning of Council Directive 85/337/EEC (1) on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, as amended by Directive 97/11/EC (2)?

1

2

What action has the Commission taken, or is it considering taking on this matter?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(23 March 2004)

(23 March 2004)

The matter to which the Honourable Member makes reference relates to a decision by the Commission to refer Ireland to the Court of Justice for non-respect of Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, as amended by Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997. One of the issues of concern related to the approach of the Irish authorities to provisions of Irish legislation that allow for the environmental impact assessment (EIA) of projects belonging to Annex II of the Directive that fall below thresholds for mandatory EIA set in the Irish legislation. These provisions for sub-threshold EIA are important in order to ensure that sufficient account is taken of smaller projects that may affect sensitive sites or that may, when combined with other similar projects, give rise to significant environmental effects. The Commission was not convinced that adequate administrative arrangements had been made to give a real meaning to these provisions, with the result that environmentally significant sub-threshold projects might be approved without prior EIA. In September 2003, the Irish authorities sent the Commission a copy of new administrative guidance on applying the relevant provisions of the Irish legislation. This guidance was published in August 2003 (3). To allow an examination of this guidance, the Commission later decided to suspend the decision to refer Ireland to the Court. The Commission is due to make a further decision on the matter during 2004.

3

---

(1)  OJ L 175, 5.7.1985, p. 40.

1

(2)  OJ L 73, 14.3.1997, p. 5.

2

(3)  ‘Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Guidance for Consent Authorities regarding Sub-threshold Development’, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, August 2003, ISBN 0-7557-1657-4.

3

---
#### Cuyahoga County Bar Association *v.*Muhlbach.

[Cite as *Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Muhlbach*(1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 547.]

(No. 99-808

Submitted June 9, 1999

Decided September 8, 1999.)

*548
      *Nancy J. Fleming; Weston, Hurd, Fallon, Paisley & Howley*and *Christopher M. Ernst; McCafferty & Perlman Co., L.P.A.,*and *Robert Steely,*for relator.

*549
      *Per Curiam.*

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Although neglect of legal matters and a failure to cooperate in the ensuing disciplinary investigation normally warrant an indefinite suspension, a one-year suspension is appropriate here given the isolated nature of the neglect, the lack of evidence of substantial damage to his client, and respondent’s eventual cooperation with relator’s investigation. See, *e.g., Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Rollins*(1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 408, 410, 704 N.E.2d 1210, 1211-1212. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. Costs taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
_I 

·,J /"ifIT< l C /:?2.C 

c/s 2 o~ 

u:::/s 3 ~1 

J:/P k~-7 

i!G 3-11 

5 /ASS5..' (Nz·. Fr lee~) 12 

AGO NR: 

19 Apr 54 

PPP PPP 

01-0: 2~153¢Z APR 54 

(PASSED THRU SSO CHANNELS TO MR AUSTIN} 

E.O 3.3(h)(2) 

PL. 86-36/50 USC 3605 

l 2 

TOP SE.CRf:T COMTROl #54-o-07832
+ 
 SHIKOKU CABLE NORTH AMERICA. INC. 


28175 Haggerty Road, Suite 166, Nov;, MiChigan 48377, United States 

Phone:248-488-8620/Fax:248-994~8090 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

United States Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood, 

On behalf of SHIKOKU CABLE NORTH AMERICA, INC., I am writing to express 

our strong support for the application of Delta Air Lines for new nonstop service 

between Detroit and Haneda. 

Approval of Delta's new service would be a major benefit for our region, where many 

corporations have strong trade and market presence with Japan. There are over 500 

Japanese companies located in Michigan and hundreds more whose business models 

rely on access to Japan and its market. The growth of our business ties with Japan has 

created demand for increased capacity to Tokyo. Our business travelers look to the 

convenience offlying into Tokyo's downtown Haneda airport. 

Detroit is a proven and successful gateway to Asia, and as an airport that can support 

trans-pacific routes. This summer Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, 

fulfilling the commitment Delta made to DTW to make it the airlines gateway to Asia. 

The addition of Haneda as a destination is a natural fit that would clearly benefit our 

business travelers. 

We would much appreciate it if you could consider of their request and approve their 

application. 

Yours faithfully, 

SlUKOKU CABLE NORTH AMERICA, INC.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                         HOUGHTEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

                 SCHEDULE RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (in thousands, except per share data)




                                                     Year ended December 31,
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                     1996       1995     1994
                                                   --------   -------   -------
Net loss                                           $(11,688)  $(9,490)  $(9,052)
                                                   --------   -------   -------

Weighted average shares of common stock
     outstanding (1)                                  9,502     6,513     5,756
Common stock issuable related to milestone
     achievement                                          1         0         0
Shares related to Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 83    2,837     3,134     3,134
                                                   --------   -------   -------
Total weighted average shares of common stock
     outstanding                                     12,340     9,647     8,890
                                                   ========   =======   =======
Net loss                                           $(11,688)  $(9,490)  $(9,052)
Preferred dividends                                     (47)     (168)     (168)
                                                   --------   -------   -------
Loss applicable to common stockholders             $(11,735)  $(9,658)  $(9,220)
                                                   ========   =======   =======
Net loss per share                                 $  (0.95)  $ (1.00)  $ (1.04)
                                                   ========   =======   =======

(1) The calculation of the shares used in computing net loss per share include
shares of preferred stock which converted into shares of common stock upon the
closing of the initial public offering, as if they were converted into shares of
common stock as of the original dates of issuance.
EX-10.2






Exhibit 10.2




HANDLEMAN COMPANY

500 Kirts Blvd.

Troy, Michigan 48084





October 30, 2008




Silver Point Finance, LLC

Two Greenwich Plaza, 1st Floor

Greenwich, CT 06830





Re: Termination of Revolving Commitments


Ladies and Gentlemen:




     Reference hereby is made to the Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of April 30, 2007 (as
amended, supplemented or otherwise modified to date, the “Credit Agreement”), by and among
Handleman Company, a Michigan corporation (“Holdings”), Handleman Services Company, a
Michigan corporation (“Handleman Services”), certain subsidiaries of Holdings identified on
the signature page hereto as “Borrowers” (such Subsidiaries, together with Handleman Services, are
referred to individually as a “Borrower” and collectively, jointly and severally, as
“Borrowers”), certain subsidiaries of Holdings identified on the signature page hereto as
“Guarantors” (such subsidiaries, together with Holdings, are referred to individually as a
“Guarantor” and collectively, jointly and severally, as “Guarantors”), the lenders
party hereto from time to time (“Lenders”), and Silver Point Finance, LLC (“Silver
Point”), as administrative agent for Lenders (in such capacity, together with its successors
and assigns in such capacity, the “Administrative Agent”) and as collateral agent for
Lenders (in such capacity, together with its successors and assigns in such capacity, the
“Collateral Agent” and together with Administrative Agent, each an “Agent” and
collectively the “Agents”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the
meanings ascribed thereto in the Credit Agreement.



     Pursuant to Section 2.12(b) of the Credit Agreement, the Borrowers hereby notify the
Administrative Agent that the Borrowers are hereby exercising their right to terminate the
Revolving Commitments, in whole, effective on October 31, 2008.



[signature page follows]




 









 








	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,





HANDLEMAN CATEGORY MANAGEMENT COMPANY

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Name:  	 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 	 
	 
	 	HANDLEMAN SERVICES COMPANY

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Name:  	 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 	 
	 
	 	HANDLEMAN REAL ESTATE LLC

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Name:  	 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 	 
	 
	 	ARTIST TO MARKET DISTRIBUTION LLC

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Name:  	 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 	 
	 
	 	REPS, L.L.C.

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Name:  	 	 
	 	 	Title:
BOR\S HAGELIN 

• 

RE~ Ws:,~~32,83J63. 

• 

Dear Elizebeth and Bill: 

Many thanks for your long and as always welcome letters 

dated June 22, which came to hand this morning. We have . ~ 

noted that you will come directly here from Menton, and 

save the mud-pack treatment for some later date. 

About July 15th would suit us fine, p1ease do not make it 

much later than that, as we plan to move on to Fryks~ts ab. 

July 31. You are t1.f course welcome to come there too: 

We have already the tape recorder, and have tried it out. 

I think that it would be a good thing to take along my typewriter also, although it may give you the same trouble as 

the French one. But you can always have some fun with A,A & 

We have noted' that the French workmen are still true to 

I have however arranged for Nyberg to take his vacation 

on in July, and to spend them in Menton. And his vacation 

probably mean having trouble with the workinen until they 

really do something about the deficiencies. I arran0ed this 

with Sture, when I had your ideas about your movements, so 

please do not hurry to get away from Menton. As mentioned 

above, around July 15 would be.i the best·: time to come to 

Sandhamn. 

We are going to Stockholm to have dinner with Mr.Edstrom, 

our good old /92 years/ friend, who now takes 3 schnappses 

for luncheon;;;. and the whole works for dinner. To morrow I 

have dinner with some sch°'-1 friends, and at midnight Annie 

and myself take the train· foJ:J Copenhagen, to attend a silver 

wedding anniversary. We than have to take a late night train 

again for Sode~tolje, as Gunnar has his birthday on the 29th. 

And on the 3rd of July we go to Langangen /suburb of Stockholl 

where Karl wflhelm lives/, and sail for Sandhamn abon.rd the 
REF ID:~263283 

, 

"Astarte". So you see tliat • we have quite a program, before • 

we settle down to take it easy at Sandhamn. 

It was nice to have the news about, and greetings from 

Anita Warner and the I-Iedclens. We are only sorry that we 

cannot see them here in Sweden. 

From Sture only good news. Except that we cannot enlarge 

our worlcs at the 'present location, but this is probably all 

:ftu;u 

to the good, as space is limited.A.anyhow. So we have decided 

to buy a lot /plot?/ j_n neighbouring Steinhausen, ab. 

60.000 sq.feet. Our intentlimtion is to keep the headquarters 

the laboratories and such manufacturing, which has not 

ed the "mass"production stage at Weinbergstrasse 12. . . I"-~ 

I am afraid that we have i10"news, and I think that we 

should save our discussions re "the book" until we meet in 

Sandhamn, so will close this letter now, with our very best 

wishes: 

Please write next to Sandhamn, Sweden: That is 

address. · 

~ffectionately, your<old !~ds '_ \"' _ 

~.e .. ~&o~
POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints each of Robert K. Kretzman and Michael T. Sheehan or any of them, each acting alone, her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for her and her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the REVLON, INC. (the Corporation) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Form 10-K) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form 10-K or amendments thereto,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any applicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents this 4th day of March, 2008.



/S/ KATHI P. SEIFERTKATHI P. SEIFERT






---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 40 (Monday, March 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 11202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04374]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, March 5, 2015 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

STATUS: This Meeting Will Be Open To The Public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 
Correction and Approval of Minutes for February 12, 2015
Draft Advisory Opinion 2014-20: Make Your Laws PAC, Inc.
Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Republican Party of 
Orange County (Federal) (RPOC) (A11-23)
Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the South Dakota Democratic 
Party (SDDP) (A11-20)
Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Kentucky State 
Democratic Central Executive Committee (KDC) (A12-05)
Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the 2012 Democratic 
National Convention Committee, Inc.
Management and Administrative Matters

    Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such 
as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, 
should contact Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-
1040, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shawn Woodhead Werth,
 Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-04374 Filed 2-26-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

OFFICE OF 

 AIR AND RADIATION 

Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems (Subpart W) of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule 

Docket: EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0923 

Title: Report Submission Memo 

Summary: This document contains several reports that were submitted during the comment 

period. 

Page 1 of 2 
Docket Memo – Reports Submission 

The EPA received the following submission of reports from several different commenters. The 

commenters made no actual comments regarding these reports. Therefore, EPA does not deem 

it necessary to respond to this submission. The two submissions include the following 

documents which are included in Regulations.gov – 

• EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0923-3521-2; 

• EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0923-3521-3; 

• EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0923-3521-4; 

• EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0923-3521-6; 

• EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0923-3521-8; and 

• EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0923-1081-1. 

One submission also includes the following documents which are not available in 

Regulations.gov since they are copyrighted publications and may not be reproduced without 

consent of the copyright holder -

• EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0923-3521-1; 

• EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0923-3521-5; 

• EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0923-3521-7; and 

• EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0923-3521-9. 

Page 2 of 2
.. 

.Mr. W. F. Friedman 

War Plana and Training Diviaion 

You are hereb7 asaigned to develop improvement in arts or 

value to the Chier Si~l Otticer, during the period cf 7our assignment to dut7 in the office of the Chief Signal Officer. 

It is expected that thi• work m&J result in the discovery of 

patentable teat'Ul'es, and 7our assignment to this work is tor the 

particular purpose or veating in the United States all right, title 

and 1ntereat to any invention that 7ou ma~ make while engaged in the 

work assigned, it in the opinion of the Chief Signal Officer the 

pub·lic interest demands that the invention be owned and controlled 

b7 the War Department. 

Acceptance of assignment to this work will constitute an 

agreement on your part to execute the papers required tor complete assignment of any such invention to the Gnited States in case the 

Chief Signal Officer decides that the invention should remain !ecret, 

or to execute the papers necessary for making application for patent and the assignment ot the patent to the United States if secrecy is 

not necessary or ls necessary only for a limited time. In the ca~e 

of an invention which the Chief Signal Officer decides should remain 

secret acceptance of this assignment also ccnstitutes an a~reement 

on 7our part that you will not disclose the invention to unauthorized 

persons until ·such time ~s you are informed in writing by the Chief 

Signal Officer, or by his order, that th~ need for secrecy has ceased. 

The assi,;nment of the invention to the United States must be 

drafted in form.to comply with requirements cf law relating tr. patent applications coming under this category; but such assigr..ment 

or instrument of transfer ma7 in a proper case include suitable 

reaervations to enable you to retain or repossess your commercial 

rights, in whole or in part, if and when the need for secrecy ceaees 

to exist. 

This notice of assignment to develop improvements in art~ cf 

value to the Signal Corps shall not be construed as divesting you of 

ownership of any invention made by you while engaged on this wcrk, 

other than those which in the opinion of the Chief Signal Officer 

should be owned and controlled b7 the War Department to safeguard ·the public interest, except that the United States shall be entitled 

to a non-exclusive li·cense to any and all inventions made by you in 

the course of the work assigned in the same way as if this special . assignment had-not been made. 

BJ order or the Chief Signal Officer: 
.. •• 

set forth in basic communication. 

/s/ William r. Friednan 

.i ..
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intermagnetics General Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the year ending August 25, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael K. Burke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


   /s/ Michael K. Burke
--------------------------
Michael K. Burke
Chief Financial Officer
October 07, 2002
99-970.

#### State ex rel. Davis v. Ghee.

Franklin App. No. 98AP-617. Reported at 86 Ohio St.3d 1438, 713 N.E.2d 1049. On motion for reconsideration and on motion under App.R. 15 for procedural emergency relief. Motions denied.
# CE2004084EN.01010003.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/100 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/100

---

(2004/C 84 E/0137)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3790/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject:   Update on funding for the city of Siena under the action programme to promote civil protection

Subject:

In reply to my earlier question E-l102/03 (1) asking whether the city of Siena had submitted projects and obtained funding under the action programme to promote civil protection, the Commission said on 22 April 2003 that the municipality had not submitted any application.

1

Can the Commission say whether, since that date, any projects have been submitted and what the outcome was?

---

(1)  OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 144.

1

---
# CE2004078EN.01054602.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/546 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/546

---

(2004/C 78 E/0578)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3430/03

by Mario Borghezio (NI) to the Commission

(18 November 2003)

Subject:   Eurostat scandal — unanswered questions

Subject:

After the fall of the Santer Commission in 1999 it was decided that relations with external firms should be governed by transparent provisions laid down in standard contracts. Why was this principle not followed by Eurostat? How can the new executive agencies avoid finding themselves in the same position?

---