alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w1






EXHIBIT 10.1




CHANGE IN TERMS AGREEMENT




	 	 	 
	BORROWER:

	 	Lender:
	WESTMORELAND RESOURCES, INC.

	 	FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
	PO BOX 449

	 	BILLINGS OFFICE-COMMERCIAL DEPT.
	HARDIN, MT 59034-0449

	 	401 NORTH 31st STREET
	 

	 	PO BOX 30918
	 

	 	BILLINGS, MT 59116






Date of Agreement: OCTOBER 28, 2008




Note Number: 1100236355




Description of Existing Indebtedness: REVOLVING LINE OF CREDIT SHOWING A
CURRENT PRINCIPAL BALANCE OF $6,200,000.00.



Description of Collateral: 10,000 SHARES OF WESTMORELAND RESOURCES STOCK AND
ALL INVENTORY, CHATTEL PAPER, ACCOUNTS, GENERAL INTANGIBLES



Description of Change in Terms: THE LINE IS LOWERED FROM A MAXIMUM CREDIT OF
$20,000,000.00 TO A MAXIMUM CREDIT OF $10,000,000.00; THE MATURITY DATE IS
EXTENDED TO NOVEMBER 28, 2008. ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO REMAIN.



Continuing Validity. Except as expressly changed by this Agreement, the terms of the original
obligation or obligations, including all agreements evidenced or securing the obligation(s), remain
unchanged and in full force and effect. Consent by Lender to this Agreement does not waive
Lender’s right to strict performance of the obligation(s) as changed, nor obligate Lender to make
any future change in terms. Nothing in this Agreement will constitute a satisfaction of the
obligation(s). It is the intention of Lender to retain as liable parties all makers and endorsers
of the original obligation(s), including accommodation parties, unless a party is expressly
released by Lender in writing. Any maker or endorser, including accommodation makers, will not be
released by virtue of this Agreement. If any person who signed the original obligation does not
sign this Agreement below, then all persons signing below acknowledge that this Agreement is given
conditionally, based on the representation to Lender that the non-signing party consents to the
changes and provisions of this Agreement or otherwise will not be released by it. This waiver
applies not only to any initial extension, modification or release, but also to all such subsequent
actions.



PRIOR TO SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT, BORROWER READ AND UNDERSTOOD ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT.
BORROWER AGREES TO THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF A COMPLETED COPY OF THE
AGREEMENT.




	 	 	 	 	 
	BORROWER: WESTMORELAND RESOURCES, INC.

 	 	 
	BY:	 	/s/ Doug Kathol
 	 	 
	 	 	DOUG KATHOL, VICE PRESIDENT 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	FIRST INTERSTATE BANK

 	 	 
	BY:	 	/s/ Steve Tostenrud	 	 
	 	 	STEVE TOSTENRUD, VICE PRESIDENT
13 November 1944 

REPORT OF TRANSPORTATION RE~UESTS FOR RECRUITMENT PROGRAM 

Up to and Including 11 November 1944 

Number of Transportation Requests Issued 

to Applicants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,760 

Number of Transportation Requests Cancelled 

or unused Tickets Returned ••••••••••• 786 

Number of Transportation Requests issued 

to Applicants Who·Hav~ Reported ior 

Duty • • • • • • • • • • 4, 902 

Number of Transportation Requests lssued 

to Applicants Reporting in Future • • • · • • • • · • 62 

Number of Transportation Requests Issued 

to Apolicants Pending Cancellation 

or Collection 

(This represents 5 persons) 

• • • • • • • • 10 

pproved for Release by NSA on 04-07-2014 pursuant to E.O. 

3526
SCPW-14-0000622
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
KELLY H. KAILIEHU, Petitioner,

vs. THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, HONOLULU DIVISION, STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent Judge,

and STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CR. NO. 14-1-000324)
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., and Circuit Judge Wilson, assigned by reason of vacancy) Upon consideration of petitioner Kelly H. Kailiehu’s “Petition for Writ of Mandamus Directed to the Honorable Judge of the District Court of the First Circuit Court, Honolulu Division, State of Hawai # i, et al.”, filed on March 25, 2014, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that petitioner may seek relief from the Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-14-0000622 11-APR-2014 10:38 AMcircuit court in his criminal case and, therefore, is not

entitled to the requested writ of mandamus at this time. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai # i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action; such writs are not intended to supersede the legal discretionary authority of the lower courts, nor are they intended to serve as legal remedies in lieu of normal appellate procedure). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, April 11, 2014. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Revlon, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Alan T. Ennis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Alan T. Ennis
Alan T. Ennis
Chief Financial Officer
March 5, 2008

---
REF ID:A67233 .. ,:. 

"""''"-

-· --_ tftKF!!lEHTIAL 

--- ... 4-.:. 

· .. 

\ I •-

Mfputea of .Mee,t!ng He:t..,d 

27 November 1944 

l. Colonel Johnston acquainted. the two new J:iembera ot the 

Committee, llajor King {vice Col. Cook) and~. Rhoad• (vice Mr. Lewis) 

_ with the reaponsibil1t1es or the Comr.dtteo and the projects pending. 

·*2. Pplicx and Procedure. - A:tter a general d111aussion, 1t waa 

agreed that each mo:rnber should outline a recolllil9nded policy to be 

!'ollor.ed with regard to th• atta.inment or the objectivee set up.. At 

tho next. mooting tho most appropriate polie1 and procedure will be 

determined and considered for adoption. 

*J. Approv(,d Tfo. - lrlajor X ing reported on an approved 't/O or 

ot'ficer gra.dea to the Bra'lches. The approved T/O'e tor enlisted grades 

and civilian personnel will be presented at the next. meeting and all 

Divisions and Branches w1J.l be notified in writing. 

*4• Qver-1.&p ot Shifts. - Art.er a. general diacuseion_, the Pereonnel 

Control Co.cnitteG reco.omended that the Personnel and Training Division 

call a :meeting 0£ all Branch Personnel O!!icera to discuss changee in 

present ho\1.rs ot work• The contemplated changes are 2 the inel.•1•ion ot 

a eepa1·ate achedula ror those branches or sectionet operatine on a oneehitt baaia, a separate schedule for thoae on a two-shitt baaia, and a 

eeparate one tor those on a three-shift ba.aieJ or a schedule £or thoae 

branchea on a one-shift baaia, and another achedule ror those on a two 

and three ah:tt't bas1a. 

Approved -----

W. Preston Corder.man 

Oolonel,, Signal Corps 

·co.mmanding 

ph • Johnston 

nel Signal Corps 

Recorder 

_...,,.. -

---=-

- . _,_ __ :_ - -;ii8 I - • ...c. f I • ma5: .\. .. .... -~- "' ...... ~- ... :~ _ .. ~~ 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-07-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e : - .;..:-- .!
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Creative Technology Ltd.
(the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Sim Wong Hoo, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Sim Wong HooSim Wong HooChief Executive OfficerDate: October 15, 2004
#### Huebl, by guardian *ad*litem, Respondent, vs. Scollard and another, Appellants.

*April 5*

April *26, 1910.*

*Costs: Guardians*ad litem.

1. The right to costs does not accrue until judgment, and until that time they may be abolished or changed in amount by statute.

2. Unless made liable by special direction of the court under sec. 2932, Stats. (Laws of 1907, ch. 325), a guardian *ad litem*is not. responsible for costs adjudged against his ward after the repeal of sec. 2931, Stats. (1898), by said act of. 1907, even though the-action was commenced prior to such repeal.

Appeal from an order of tbe circuit court for Milwaukee county: J. 0. Ludwig, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*J. A. Eg gen,*for tbe appellants.

Eor tbe respondent tbe cause was submitted on tbe brief' of *F. G. Eschweiler.*

WiNslow, C. J.

There is no necessity for a detailed statement of facts of tbe case. Tbe question presented is this: Can tbe guardian *ad litem*of an infant plaintiff be punished for contempt because be fails to pay a judgment for costs rendered against bis ward in April, 1909, in an action commenced in December, 1902? It is plain that this question must be answered in tbe negative. At tbe time tbe judgment was rendered there was no statute making tbe guardian *ad litem*liable for such costs, unless tbe court should specially direct him to pay them on account of mismanagement or bad faith in the action. Sec. 2932, Stats. (1898), as amended by ch. 325, Laws of 1907. It is true that at tbe time tbe action was commenced sec. 2931, Stats. (1898), provided that a guardian *ad litem*of an infant plaintiff should be responsible for costs adjudged against bis ward and that payment might be enforced by attachment, but this *590'Section was repealed *in toto*by ch. 325, Laws of 1907. No rights were saved by the repealing act, and there is no vested right in costs. The right to them does not accrue until judgment. Until that time they may be abolished or changed in amount'by statute. *Two Rivers Mfg. Co. v. Beyer,*74 Wis. 210, 220, 42 N. W. 232.

The court below so held, and hence the order refusing to punish for contempt must be affirmed.

*By the Cowrt.*— It is so ordered.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 164 (Friday, August 23, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 52601]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20656]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8434]

Culturally Significant Object Imported for Exhibition; 
Determinations: ``Visiting Masterpiece: Piero della Francesca's 
Senigallia Madonna, an Italian Treasure, Stolen and Recovered'' and 
``Piero della Francesca: Intimate Encounters''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the object to be 
included in the exhibition ``Visiting Masterpiece: Piero della 
Francesca's Senigallia Madonna, An Italian Treasure, Stolen and 
Recovered'' at the Museum of Fine Arts and the exhibition ``Piero della 
Francesca: Intimate Encounters'' at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
is of cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at the Museum of Fine 
Arts, Boston, MA, from on or about September 13, 2013, until on or 
about January 6, 2014; the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY, 
from on or about January 13, 2014, until on or about March 30, 2014, 
and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, 
is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit object, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 15, 2013.
Lee Satterfield,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-20656 Filed 8-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
REF IQajl61004 

~~A liEtEbQE~~NI EBQGB~~ 

.... COLLEGE .._...,.....,....._ .... _. .... TRAINING _. ...... _. ................ _ 

COLL'EGE ~ PROORl'Jl 

ADVAB!ED mavERSIT'! &.rUDY P.ROGRAM 

!'EJ.Jm'SHI.ti' PROGRAM 

SPECIAL LANGUAGE im.t\IlmfG CounsES 

.AMERICAN MAlf.flelm.Em! .ABSOO. SEMUtARS 

EXF.eUTIVB DEVELOPMENT PBOORAlti ( CORN!ilJ.,. HARVARD) 

GOVERNMENT TRAINING FACILITIES -------------..... ------------.--. ...,.~._, .... ._...,.~ .... ---

S!'l<m COURSES <Jr 'l'HE ARMED SERVICES 

BASIC Df.rELLIGERCE COURSE - CIA 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 01-31-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
#### McCormick and another, Appellants, vs. Ryan and another, Respondents.

*February 2*7

March *20, 1900.*

*Executions: Limitations: Judgment's transcripted from, justices’ courts.*

Sec. 3968, Stats. 1898 (providing that execution shall not be issued upon any judgment after twenty years from its rendition), and sec. 3900 (providing that execution on a judgment transcripted from justice’s court shall not issue after the period of the lien thereof on real estate, viz. ten years from the date of rendition) are not in conflict and both must be enforced.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for La Fay-•ette county: G-e'o. ClemeNtsoN, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Upon an affidavit complying with sec. 2968, Stats. 1898, showing the whole amount to be unsatisfied, the circuit court, on October 20,1898, refused leave for execution upon a judgment of a justice of the peace dated January 19,1881, and duly transcripted and docketed to the circuit court. From such order the plaintiffs appeal.

For the appellants there were briefs by *Bushnell, Watldns <&*Moses, and oral argument by *A. B. Bushnell.*

For the respondents the cause was submitted on the brief of *JEdioin T. Morrison.*1

Dodge, J.

Sec. 2968, Stats. 1898, contains the provision: “ In no case shall an execution be issued or any proceedings had upon any judgment after twenty years from the time of the rendition thereof.” Sec. 2900, regulating the docket-*210lug of judgments upon transcripts from justices of the peace, provides: “No action can be brought upon the same as a judgment of such [circuit] court, nor execution issued thereon, after the expiration of the period of the lien thereof on real estate provided by section 2902;” viz. ten years from the date of rendition. Appellants’ contention is that because sec. 2968 does not prohibit issue of execution until twenty years, therefore there is conflict between the two sections above referred to, and sec. 2968 should control. The vice in this argument is that no conflict exists. It is entirely consistent with the prohibition of sec. 2968 against issuing execution on *cmy*judgment after twenty years to provide by sec. 2900 that none shall issue after ten years on judgments transcripted from justice’s court. Sec. 2900 does not take away any right or privilege granted or assured by sec. 2968. That statute is negative, and prohibits rights after twenty years, but does not confer any during that period. The two statutes can perfectly well stand and be enforced together according to their exact words, and therefore they must be. *Att'y Gen. ex rel. Taylor v. Brown,*1 Wis. 513.

*By the*Court.— Judgment affirmed.
#### Welch *v.*Watkins and Pickett.

A note was given by tile Plaintiff to *Watkins*for lands, which, it turned out, *Tí atldns*never had : *Watkins*cannot recover oil the note, and as the note (being for the delivery of specific articles) was un-uegntiable, *Pickett*is subject to the same objection.

Tin- bill staled that *Watkins*pretended to be possessed of lands on the Cumberland river, of good quality, and enticed the Complainant to purchase 1000 acres, for which the Complainant gaye a note to deliver a good wagon and team by such a day, *Watkins*at the same time giving bis bond to make a title. Afterwards, *Watkins*was applied to for the title, but did not make it, and in fact was found to possess no land, and confessed he bad not any there ; but before this, he liad endorsed the note to *Pickett. Watkins*failed to answer, and ihe bill was taken *pro cmifesso*as u> him. *Pickett*answered, and insisted he had purchased the note for a valuable conside*424ration. The. bill further set forth, that *Vickelt,*in the name of *Watkins,*had obtained judgment upon the note for pounds, and had received Jl80 and had after-wards taken out execution for the ful! amount of the judg-menU

*Per curiam*

The bill states, and it is not denied, that the note was given for lands sold, to which the vendor cannot make a title. He cannot therefore in equity, demand payment of the money, and is not entitled to a recovery of it. in the next place, this note is not negotiable, and therefore, *Pickett*stands in the same place as *Watkins*himself did with respect to the note, ami all equitable defences that might have been set up against it.— It is immaterial to *Welch,*whether he gave a valuable consideration for it or not to *Watkins.*Wherefore let the injunction be made perpetual. Had the prayer of this bill extended far enough, we would have made *Pickett*refund the money lie has received.

*Noth.*— Vide *Jordan*v. *Black & Hormblow,*2 *Mur.*30.
Filed by sedaredgar.com - Trans-Orient Petroleum Ltd. - Exhibit 4.5






TRANS-ORIENT PETROLEUM LTD. 
SHARE OPTION PLAN

March 14, 2008

OPTION COMMITMENT 

Notice is hereby given that, effective this 14th day
of March, 2008 (the “Effective Date”) TRANS-ORIENT PETROLEUM LTD. (the
“Company”) has granted to Drew Cadenhead, an Option to acquire 500,000 Common
Shares (“Optioned Shares”) up to 5:00 p.m. Pacific time on the 14th
day of March, 2013 (the “Expiry Date”) at a Exercise Price of US$0.50 per share.
Optioned Shares may be acquired as follows: 

	 	(a) 	
      1/3 of the total number of Optioned Shares granted will
      vest six months after the Effective Date;

	 	 	 
	 	(b) 	
      a further 1/3 of the total number of Optioned Shares
      granted will vest one year after the Effective Date; and

	 	 	 
	 	(c) 	
      the remaining 1/3 of the total number of Optioned Shares
      granted will vest eighteen months after the Effective
  Date.



In the event that the Company achieves Tier 1 status on the TSX
Venture Exchange, the Company will grant to Drew Cadenhead an additional option
to acquire 500,000 Common Shares (“Additional Optioned Shares”) exercisable at
the market price on the date the Additional Optioned Shares are granted. The
grant of the Additional Optioned Shares will be made subject to the terms and
conditions of the Company’s Share Option Plan and evidenced by an Option
Commitment. 

The grant of the Optioned Shares evidenced hereby is made
subject to the terms and conditions of the Company’s Share Option Plan, the
terms and conditions of which are hereby incorporated in this Option Commitment.


To exercise your Option, deliver to the Company at its then
principal business office, a written notice specifying the number of Optioned
Shares you wish to acquire, together with cash or a certified cheque payable to
the Company for the aggregate Exercise Price. A certificate for the Optioned
Shares so acquired will be issued by the transfer agent as soon as practicable
thereafter and will bear a legend stipulating any resale restrictions required
under applicable securities laws. 

 

TRANS-ORIENT PETROLEUM LTD. 


/s/Garth
Johnson                                                                      

President 




- 2 - 

I hereby acknowledge receipt of a copy of the Plan and agree to
be bound by the terms of the Plan. This commitment supersedes any prior Option
or commitment made to me. 

OPTIONEE 

/s/Drew
Cadenhead                                                               


Name:            
________________________________

Print
Name:    ________________________________

Address:        ________________________________

                        ________________________________