alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Sutton, Appellant, vs. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis *&*Omaha Railway Company, Respondent.

*February 2*7

March *20, 1900.*

*Appeal: Insufficient return: Dismissal.*

An appeal from a judgment will be dismissed unless a judgment roll satisfying the requirements of sec. 2898, Stats. 1898, has been transmitted to this court as required by sec. 8050.

Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for Monroe county: O. E. WyMAn, Circuit Judge.

*Appeal dismissed.*

An order was entered dismissing tbe action and for judgment in defendant’s favor for costs, because plaintiff, after the reversaron appeal to tbis court, of a judgment rendered in bis favor, failed to bring tbe cause again to trial in tbe circuit court witbin one year. Judgment was entered accordingly, from wbicb this appeal was taken.

Tbe cause was submitted for the appellant on tbe brief of *T. J. Sutton, in pro. per.,*and for tbe respondent on a brief by *II. L. Humphrey*and *T. A. Holleys,*attorneys, and *Thomas Wilson,*of counsel.

Maeshall, J.

The papers sent to tbis court by tbe clerk of the circuit court consist of some affidavits, the order for judgment, and some other papers. The clerk’s certificate is to tbe effect that tbe papers transmitted are all the papers on file in his office. The return does not contain tbe pleadings, or anything satisfying tbe requirements of sec. 2898, Stats. 1898, as to tbe contents of a judgment roll, or a bill of exceptions, or a certificate showing what papers were used on tbe motion to dismiss. Eespondent’s counsel called tbe court’s attention to the insufficiency of the return and asked that tbe appeal be dismissed because of such insufficiency.

*226Sec. 3050 requires the judgment roll to be transmitted to this court as a part of the return on appeal from a judgment. The court has often held that, without a return in substantial compliance with the statute, the appeal cannot be entertained. *Superior C. L. Co. v. Superior,*104 Wis. 463, and cases cited.

*By the*Cowrt.— The appeal is dismissed.
SCWC-19-0000329

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

KENNETH M. SKAHAN, 

Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant,

vs.

STUTTS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., 

Respondent/Employers-Appellee,

and

FIRST INSURANCE COMPANY OF HAWAII, LTD., 

Respondent/Insurance Carrier-Appellee. 

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-19-0000329; CASE NO. AB 2015-372(M) and DCD (7-14-45072))

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/claimant-appellant Kenneth M. Skahan’s

application for writ of certiorari, filed on July 10, 2019, is

hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 2, 2019.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-19-0000329

02-AUG-2019

07:51 AM
-Me~s13e 

USCIB: 5.3/95 

~QP SESRI!a' U:,S, ~ om.'I 

MF.MORANDLM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIBEC: 

Subject: Tentative Minutes. 

15 June 1955 

1. Forwarded herewith is a copy of the Tentative Minutes of the 

Thirtieth Meeting of USCIBEC. Please advise the Secretary if' any changes 

are desired. 

2. In the event there is no objection to these minutes on the pa·rt 

of USCIBEC members by 27 June 1955 they will be considered approved. 

Enclosure 

1 copy of Tentative Minutes, 

Thirtieth Meeting of USCIBEC • 

. 

~+-~ 

\,k..~<L" ~ ! "S. 4 /7 ~ 

" \Cl..'" ra •. 4 .. "'-/ s-o 

u. ~ e.. I (-0 '· I &.{-. I I C/..'f 

k_ ';)Cl L (5 : ( 1. 7 /~ ~ 

~ :>d?.. ~ ! ier. '7 I l-r 

\L-,a..113•. 1).7/i-& 

USCIB: 5.3/95 

eclassifi ed and a 

USCIB 

ItA:NBhl!i 7/IA 60MIN! Gll-A:NNEbB ONl.¥ . 

ursuantto E .0. 1352 
60NPIJ9ft'!Afi - ti. S. I!l!BS OH:E.¥ 

PRF.SENT: 

DEFENSE: 

STATE: 

m!!= 

NAVY: 

AIR FORCE 

CIA: 

-

SECRETARIAT: 

ALSO PRESENT: 

DEFENSE: 

~: 

!§.!: 

NAVY: 

-

MINUTES OF THE THmTmH MEETING 

OF THE 

USCIB EXECUTIVE CCl-4MI'l'TEE 

Captain Rufus L. Taylor, USN, Chairman I 

Mr. William H. Godel 

Mr. T. Achilles Polyzoides 

Mr. s. Drake Ellis 

Captain Jack s. Holtwick, Jr. 1 USN 

Lt. Colonel Richard Leffers 

Commander Frederick E. Weldon 

(for Commander William F. Bringle) 

Lt. Colonel Frank J. Harrold, Jr. 

Mr. Hamill D. Jones 

'Mrs. Daphne O. Tucker · 

Mr. Philip J. Patton 

Mr. Robert E. Drake 

Mr. Robert F. Packard 

Mr. Hugh S. Erskine 

Mr. Benson K. Bui'fha.m 

Mr. Milton S. Zaslow 

Lt. Commander Paul J. Karl, Jr., USN 

Mr. John F. 0 1Gara 

Major Arnie L. Millican 

Lt. Commander Dora Davis 

CO~'FIDENTIAL 

OGA 
~rc:JR.;M7.?fl.3 CVl ti JVLll 1 J 11"1""' e 

"eoNPIBl!M'i':EAfi - e.s. S!FS ONH 

AIR FORCE: Colonel Charles P. Richman 

Colonel John H. McCann 

Major J. Craig Teller 

Major John H. Remick 

Major C. Roger Wells, Jr. 

Major Robert A. Brooks 

Major David D. Morris 

Captain Allen T. Miller 

Captain Wayne J. Weltin 

C<l4MITTEE CHAIHMEN: Lt. Colonel Henry C. Simmons, US.AF (INTCOM) 

Major William R. Culmer, USA (SECCOM) 

The Thirtieth Meeting of the United States Communications Intell:i.gence 

Board Executive Committee was held at 1400 on 26 May 1955 in Room 2C46S, 

National Defense Building, Washington, D. C. 

OGA 

... 2 -

CONFllJEP..lTIAL
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                       Thirteen Weeks Ended               Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
                                                   March 28,          March 29,         March 28,        March 29,
                                                     1997               1996              1997             1996
                                                                 (000's omitted, except per share data)


<S>                                                    <C>              <C>              <C>               <C>
PRIMARY
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding                    9,548            9,577            9,590             9,543

Net effect of dilutive stock
 options-based on the
 treasury stock method using
 average market price                                    158              248              157               332
                                                     --------         -------          -------           -------
     Total                                             9,706            9,825            9,747             9,875
                                           

Net income                                         $     164        $   1,362        $   1,259         $   4,689
                                           

Net income per share                               $    0.02        $    0.14        $    0.13         $    0.47
                                           

FULLY DILUTED
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding                    9,548            9,577            9,590             9,543

Net effect of dilutive  stock  options-based
 on the treasury stock method using the 
 greater of the average market price or
 period end market price                                 158              248              157               332
                                                     --------         -------          -------           -------
     Total                                             9,706            9,825            9,747             9,875
                                           

Net income                                         $     164        $   1,362        $   1,259         $   4,689
                                           

Net income per share                               $    0.02        $    0.14        $    0.13         $    0.47
</TABLE>
Conservation Stewardship Program - Grassland Conservation Initiative Fiscal Year 2024 United States Department of Agriculture

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Code Practice Component Units Unit Cost

E300GCI Grassland Conservation Initiative Grassland Conservation Initiative Activity AC $18.00

CSP-Grassland Conservation Itiative Page 1 of 1 Connecticut - Fiscal Year 2024
EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the Quarterly Report of HEI, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended February 25, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Mack V. Traynor, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley AcT of2002, that to the best of my knowledge:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.       /s/ Mack V. Traynor, III Mack V. Traynor, III
3 

4 

REMARKS 

REF ID:A65780 

UTING SLIP I NEVER USE FOR APPROJ6 DISAPPROVALS, 

CONCURRENCES, OR .. AR ACTIONS 

INITIALS CIRCULATE 

DATE COORDINATION 

FILE 

INFORMATION 

NECESSARY ACTION 

NOTE AND 

RETURN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

FROM NAME OR TITLE 

DD FORM 9 5 Replaces DA AGO Form 895, 1 Apr 48, and AFRQ -11-7-<I GPO 'tc 

I FEB 50 Form 12. 10 Nov 47, which may tie usod. 
~b_:~657BO 

--~ 

6---~ . 

. _, )rVl ' ~ <Ql/-J 0-

wvt d 
' .. ' . ··- .,~ 
T' 

.--~~~~---~-:R-~F~B~A657&Q~~~~-

MEM• 0 ROUTING SLIP .. ,.....,. r--.~ !!SE !'OR A!'!'!WV1!!.S, DISAPPROVALS, 

'NCURRENCES, OR SIMILAR ACTIONS 

t NAME OR TITLE&e ~ INITIALS 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION DATE 

2 

3 

4 

REMARKS 

,, 

CIRCULATE 

COORDINATION 

FILE 

INFORMATION 

NECESSARY 

ACTION 

NOTE AND RETURN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

TELEPHONE 

Kepi"'""' DA AGO Form SOG, 1 Apr 48, and AFB.Q -10--tlH81-4 GPO * 

Form 12. 10 Nov 47, which may tie usod. 
t I - "- "' ........ --.. ~
PRESENT: 

Lt. Colonel John M. l..ibb7 

Major lf.aurice H. Kl~in 

lst Lt. H. S. Buchanan 

lst Lt. Cyrus B. ./ill 

l. PROWTIONS: 

Dr. S, Kullback 

llr. AltrQd U. Rose 

Ur. Frank .B. Rowlett 

Mr. Jolm L. Sullivan 

.... The l'ollOlfing pro.motion requests were considered by the Boant: 

Name Pnaent Position Proposed Poeitiqp -

lla:r,y Olena Adams Research Analyst (Crypt.) Research Analyst <.crypt.) 

AS-9.3 P-2 P-J 

Shirley Storm Bigler Research Analyst (Cxypt.) Research Analyst (Crypt.) 

AS-93 P-2 P-3 

l'argaret C. Deeter Historian Historian 

AS·l3 P-2 P-3 

Joseph E. Richard. Research Analyst (Crypt.) Research Analyst (Crypt.) 

AS-9.3 P-2 P-3 

Robert Sackman Electrical Engineer Electrical F..ngineer 

AS-73 P-:3 P-4 , 

The Board unanim.ousJ..y recommended approval of all promotions. 

2. OTHER ITF10 DlSGUSSl:D: 

a. Major Klein brought up the question or the downgrading ot employees. 

Operations Division baa two cases under consideration and Research and Development Division has three. Mr. Sullivan Dtate<i that tair consideration should be 

given to all caseB in which personnel are downgraded, and promotion made when 

possible. 

b. Mr. Sullivan discussed. the question of what Personnel and Training 

Branch is ~oing 1n regard to torrner employees here. A project was begun approximatttly' .tour or five wectks ago to establish current addresses or people who n.re at 

some time employed by this Agency. A form is being'sent out to most ot these 

eclassified and approved for release by 

SA on 04-17-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352 
people on a selective basis requost1.ng their current address. ''lhen the cards 

are retumed the information ia posted to service records in PtH"Bonnel and 

Training Branch. It sudden eJCp&nsion becomes necessary, this intorsnation· 

wilJ. make possible immediate contact. tor recruitment or experienced and compeiient personnel. iiben a detinit.e expansion act.ua113 takea place, caretul 

screening will be made to elim1nat.e kllO"r'm uncleesirables betore recx;uitment 

begins. 

There being no other subjects tor discussion or comments, the meeting 

waa adjourned. 

Jlvv~~ JOHN L. SULLIVAN 

Chairman, 

Civilian Flnplo7118nt Board
# CE2004088EN.01069401.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/694 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/694

---

(2004/C 88 E/0713)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0312/04

by Elspeth Attwooll (ELDR) to the Commission

(2 February 2004)

Subject:   Development aid

Subject:

What is the EU budget's total contribution for overseas aid, both as an amount and as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI)? Can the Commission provide an equivalent figure for the United States?

When the individual national budgets of the Member States of the EU are taken into account in addition to the contribution of the EU budget, what is the total contribution by the EU for overseas development aid, as an amount and as a percentage of the EU's GNI?

As a percentage of GNI, how does the UK's national budget for overseas development aid compare to that of the other 14 Member States and of the 10 accession states?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(10 March 2004)

(10 March 2004)

In 2002, the EU total contribution for official development aid was USD 29 949 million, equal to 0,365 % of Gross National Income (GNI). The USA total contribution for official aid was USD 13 290 million, equal to 0,13 % of GNI. Those two ratios are respectively above and below the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development/Development Cooperation Directorate (OECD/DAC) average which is at 0,23 % of GNI (with an exchange rate EUR/USD of 1,28).

The budget managed by the European Community accounted for EUR 6 962 million in 2002 and was included by the Member States in their statistics on the basis of their contribution keys for the budget and the European Development Fund.

The ranking of the Member States in % of GNI for 2002 was:

| 1. | Denmark 0,96 %; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Denmark 0,96 %;

| 2. | Sweden 0,83 %; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Sweden 0,83 %;

| 3. | Netherlands 0,81 %; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Netherlands 0,81 %;

| 4. | Luxemburg 0,77 %; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Luxemburg 0,77 %;

| 5. | Belgium 0,43 %; |
| --- | --- |

5.

Belgium 0,43 %;

| 6. | Ireland 0,40 %; |
| --- | --- |

6.

Ireland 0,40 %;

| 7. | France 0,38 %; |
| --- | --- |

7.

France 0,38 %;

| 8. | Finland 0,35 %; |
| --- | --- |

8.

Finland 0,35 %;

| 9. | United Kingdom 0,31 %; |
| --- | --- |

9.

United Kingdom 0,31 %;

| 10. | Germany 0,27 %; 10. Portugal 0,27 %; 12. Austria 0,26 %; 12. Spain 0,26 %; |
| --- | --- |

10.

Germany 0,27 %; 10. Portugal 0,27 %; 12. Austria 0,26 %; 12. Spain 0,26 %;

| 14. | Greece 0,21 %; |
| --- | --- |

14.

Greece 0,21 %;

| 15. | Italy 0,20 %. |
| --- | --- |

15.

Italy 0,20 %.

The ten Acceding countries have collectively an average ratio of official development assistance (ODA)/GNI at about 0,03 % of their GNI.

---
Exhibit (32)(1)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of C-COR Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 23, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Woodle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to
my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/    DAVID A. WOODLE 
|David A. Woodle        
|Chief Executive Officer
|November 2, 2005
FORM A7031 SEP 97 

NSN 7540-FM-001-5822 

REF ID :·A65893 

USCIB: 13.6/21 

17 May 1954 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Approval of USCIB 13.6/19, dated 3 May 1954. 

No objection having been raised to the subject paper prior 

to 1700, 13 May 1954, the USCIBEC decision referred to therein 

(approval of USCIB 13.6/17) is considered approved by USCIB. 

USCIB: 13.6/21 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 04-09-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

1- ! ( -

I -

r 

I 

t 

f 

t 

! 

I 

i 

~ 

r- -

• r 

k 

~
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LUC DORSIN and ERTHA JOSEPH a/k/a LISTA JOSEPH
, Appellant s ,

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW YORK

a s Trustee f or THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS CWABS, INC.

ASSET

- BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006

- 19, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2421

[ June 27, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; B a rry J. Stone

, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No.

CACE10021750

.

Nardo Dorsin of Nardo Dorsin, P.A., Tama rac, and F. Scott Fistel of Fistel Law Group, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant s

.

Matthew A. Ciccio and Jennifer Travieso of Aldridge Pite, LLP, Delray Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER
, C.J., W ARNER and C ONNER

, JJ., concur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,006,892
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,143,287
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 10,653,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,993,212
<PP&E>                                       2,560,689
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,146,764
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,298,622
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,191,867
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,484
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,312,926
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,298,622
<SALES>                                     24,451,667
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,451,667
<CGS>                                       12,482,967
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,482,967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (564,699)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (236,800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (327,899)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (327,899)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1701 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1701

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to modify a provision 
   relating to discharges of dredged or fill material into navigable 
                  waters at specified disposal sites.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 25, 2015

 Ms. Murkowski introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to modify a provision 
   relating to discharges of dredged or fill material into navigable 
                  waters at specified disposal sites.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Infrastructure Rehabilitation Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. DISCHARGE INTO NAVIGABLE WATERS AT SPECIFIED DISPOSAL SITES.

    Section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 
1344) is amended by striking subsection (a) and inserting the 
following:
    ``(a) Discharge Into Navigable Waters at Specified Disposal 
Sites.--
            ``(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (3), the Secretary 
        may issue permits, after notice and opportunity for public 
        hearings, for the discharge of dredged or fill material into 
        the navigable waters at specified disposal sites.
            ``(2) Publication of notice.--Not later than 15 days after 
        the date on which an applicant submits all the information 
        required to complete an application for a permit under this 
        subsection, the Secretary shall publish the notice required 
        under paragraph (1).
            ``(3) Natural disaster.--The Secretary may issue permits 
        under paragraph (1) without providing notice or opportunity for 
        public hearings in the event of a natural disaster (including 
        an earthquake, flood, hurricane, tornado, or avalanche) that 
        has damaged a roadway, railway, airport, or other 
        transportation infrastructure such that immediate construction 
        is required to restore the infrastructure to working order.''.
                                 <all>
```