alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.34



                                                                        PRIME
                                                                        RESPONSE

April 29th/ 1999

Dear Jamie,

Following the Prime Response Group Inc. Board Meeting yesterday, April 28th,
in New York City, I am pleased to inform you that the Board would like to extend
to you the offer of becoming the Company's Chief Financial Officer effective
immediately, reporting to myself.

This position will be based in the USA, at the soon to be established Company
Headquarters in Boston (Cambridge), Massachusetts.  The exact timing of your
move will clearly be dependent on acquiring, the appropriate Visa, and the
Company will naturally sponsor your application, but it is expected that you
will be able to complete the move sometime between mid-June 1999 and mid-July.

Your salary will be $180,000, the exact translation of your existing Sterling
salary.  Your 1999 Bonus Scheme, already confirmed by the Compensation
Committee, will move with you, under the same terms and conditions, paying out
$65,000 for 1999 if the conditions set for awarding the bonus are achieved.

I will be shortly reviewing the appropriateness of your current Stock Option
situation with the Compensation Committee and will notify you of its findings in
due course.

Your move to the U.S., being sponsored by the Company, will be eligible for
financial support under the terms of the Company, a Retention policy, which has
been approved by the Compensation Committee.  Other than as noted above all
other aspects of your employment are continuous and the terms and conditions
under which you are employed by the company are unaltered.

While the company is sponsoring your Visa application, clearly much of the
practical work needed to make this transfer will be largely down to yourself to
manage, as the Company does not as yet have the resources to provide specialist
support.  However, do not hesitate to ask me for whatever practical or official
support I may need to provide.

Jamie, the rest of the Board and myself wish you every success in this new role
and if you are happy to accept the position on the terms stated above please
sign below as indicated and return to me.

                                    Sincerely,

                                    /s/ Peter Boni

                                    Peter Boni


              (Chief Executive Officer, Prime Response Group Inc.)

                              Accepted:

                              Jamie Gunn /s/ Jamie Gunn
                                         -----------------
#### In *Wilson*v. *Lineberger,*from Gaston:

Smith, C. J.

The plaintiff’s counsel moves upon her affidavit of facts proved before the referee and annexing a copy of her own testimony, for a writ of *certiorari*to perfect the incomplete record before us at the last term, when the cause was argued and decided, with the intention, as is suggested, to ask for a re-hearing. We adverted in the opinion to the absence of the evidence before the referee and upon which his report was based, so that we were confined to his rulings upon the facts reported and the review of them by the court. 83 N. C., 524. The motion is a novel one and without precedent in the practice of the court. If the evidence shall change the aspect of the case and make it materially different from what it was when heard, we should be required *not to rehear and correct an error of law, but to try a new case.*If there is an error in the former decision it must be discovered in the case, then presented, without modification of facts. If the evidence desired' does *837not have the effect, it would be of no practical benefit to have the record completed as proposed. .

It was the duty of counsel to suggest the diminution before the cause was beard and then ask for this remedial process: not to wait till the decision and then demand it. It would be productive of much mischief to relax the salutary rule which requires counsel to see that their cause is properly before the court in the record, and to abide the consequences if it is not. The writ must be denied.

Pee. Curiam. Motion denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:  February 9, 2006
    /s/ Christina W. HaganChristina W. HaganExecutive Vice President,
Secretary, Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 4.7
 
 THIS FIRST AMENDING  AGREEMENT v e as of the 16 th day of December,
 
   ALMADEN MINERALS  LTD.,a British Columbia company
 
 
 ALMADEX MINERALS  LIMITED,
 
 
  
 
 A.
The Parties are parties to an Administrative  Services Agreement made  effective as of the 15thday of May,2015 (the "ASA");B.
All terms used in this First Amending  Agreement  that are defined in the ASA shall, unless otherwise indicated, have the meanings ascribed to them in the ASA;C.
The Parties wish to amend the terms of the ASA as hereinafter provided.
 NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein, and of other good and valuable consideration , the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby expressly acknowledged by each of the Parties, the Parties hereby agree that the ASA is hereby amended as follows:
 
 1. The following is added immediately after Subsection 6.2(d) o f the ASA:
 
 " (e)      The Parties acknowledge that the terms of Subsection 6.2(a) were agreed to by the Parties on the basis of the pre-existing and on-going relationship of the Parties such that it was mutuall y understood that no notice of termination would be given by either Party without advance planning on the part of both Parties to permit an orderly transition and minimize business disruption following the giving of such notice . If , however , either Party is subject to a Change of Control during the term of this Agreement (such Party referred to in this Subsection 6 . 2(e) as the " Target " ) there will not be adequate time for such advance plann i ng and , notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement , the Parties agree that upon a Change of Control the Manager's engagement hereunder shall, unless otherwise agreed to in writing by both
   
 
 
 
 Parties, automatically terminate 48 hours after the Change of Control with immediate effect and the Target shall forthwith upon such termination pay to the other Party $2 million as compensation for the unplanned termination of the Manager's engagement hereunder and the significant disruption to the business of the other Party as a result of such unplanned termination, such amount being a genuine pre-estimate by the Parties of the loss such other Party will suffer as a consequence thereof. For purposes of this Agreement, "Change of Control" means the date upon which, without the Target's written concurrence therewith, any person (as that term is defined in the Securities Act (British Columbia)) makes and does not withdraw a take over bid (as that term is defined in the S e curities Act (British Columbia)) or acquires, directly or indirectly, that number of common shares of the Target which equals or exceeds twenty percent (20%) of the then issued common shares of the Target. "
 
 2. Except as amended by this First Amending Agreement , all terms and conditions of the
   
 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 
 
 
 
 
 ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.Per:Morgan PoliquinCEO & PresidentALMADEX MINERALS LIMITEDPer:Douglas McDonaldVice President & Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<CIK> 0000351385
<NAME> ASTRO COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
       
<S>                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>        YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                               NOV-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                            JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                  239,603
<SECURITIES>                            883,000
<RECEIVABLES>                           574,458
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                             936,303
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      2,655,912
<PP&E>                                1,161,891
<DEPRECIATION>                        1,034,876
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        6,555,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   700,550
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                 71,818
<OTHER-SE>                            8,649,241
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          6,555,824
<SALES>                               1,098,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      1,249,000
<CGS>                                   309,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           933,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       10,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         333,000
<INCOME-TAX>                             17,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     316,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            316,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0              
                                             

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 99

            WINTHROP RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATES I, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                         FORM 10-QSB SEPTEMBER 30, 1999


Supplementary Information Required Pursuant to Section 9.4 of the Partnership
Agreement


     1.   Statement of Cash Available for Distribution for the three months
          ended September 30, 1999:

          Net loss                                             $(29,000)
          Add:    Cash from reserves                             29,000
                                                               --------

          Cash Available for Distribution                      $      -

                                                               ========


     2.   Fees and other compensation paid or accrued by the Partnership to the
          General Partners, or their affiliates, during the three months ended
          September 30, 1999:


                Entity Receiving               Form of
                  Compensation               Compensation              Amount
          --------------------------         ------------              ------

          None










                                    12 of 12
Exhibit (32)(2)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of C-COR Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 29 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William T. Hanelly, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ WILLIAM T. HANELLY                                     
|William T. Hanelly Chief Financial Officer November 8, 2006
# CE2004088EN.01028301.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/283 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/283

---

(2004/C 88 E/0290)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1114/04

by Proinsias De Rossa (PSE) to the Commission

(14 April 2004)

Subject:   Civil protection

Subject:

During my recent meetings with representatives of the Dublin Fire Brigade Union, they expressed an interest in being consulted during the preparation of future EU Community Action Programmes in the field of Civil Protection.

To ensure that Irish fire fighters are prepared for the implementation of current Community Action Programmes, the Dublin Fire Brigade representatives believe that a conference should be held for fire fighting groups from all 25 EU Member States and accession countries.

The conference would provide an opportunity for those responsible for the protection of European civilians to discuss coordination of EU activities. It would be one vital step towards better protection against, and reactions to, crises. I believe that a conference of EU fire brigades and police forces is particularly imperative in the wake of the tragic Madrid bombings in March.

Would the Commission consider organising such a conference? If so, what EU funding might be available?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(30 April 2004)

(30 April 2004)

The Community Action Programme in the field of civil protection aims at supporting and supplementing Member States' efforts and at facilitating cooperation, exchange of experience and mutual assistance between Member States in the field of civil protection. To that effect the Commission consults on a regular basis with the competent authorities of the Member States. The fire fighters associations should liaise with the national civil protection authorities in order to contribute to the future action programme in the field of civil protection.

The recently finalised fire safety project developed under the Civil Protection Action Programme foresees the establishment of a network of national civil protection authorities in order to examine the most urgent issues to be handled by the fire safety community. Amongst these issues, the coordination of EU activities might be considered as a vital step towards better protection against and reactions to crises involving fire brigades.

---
### Re: Fw: Submission of Two Acetaldehyde Study Reports for HPV 2 Rule:

CASRN 75

- 07

- 0

David Brooks to: Paul Campanella 09/24/2012 02:18 PM

Cc: John Schaeffer, Mark Townsend

Hi Paul,

We have revie wed our contractor's report and it is acceptable. Please see attached file.

75

- 07

- 0_HPV2_FINAL Daphnia and Algae DA_09.14.2012.docx

Dave

David Brooks

Risk Assessment Division (7403M)

High Production Volume Chemical Branch

EPA East Room 6308N

(202) 564

- 8603
t. - ----) 

1'70P 6111~1'.Q'R~, DD Ur-- ..., .&J '-" .L" i.:J ~ -

(!_1~ ~ 24 

USClBi 13/'J~ 

-- j 

e HQF apyun BJSR!f:'!B == zir 

}iEtp!\~JDi FOR THE MEMBR~tLQf USCID,i ~ 

PIP 11-~. 

9Fob~1953 

Subjet.:t: Request tor USCIB A~al of P$.rls=Naples Courier 

Service tor Codewo.rtf JfaterW •• 

I lo The enclonre is forwarded~ uone.ideration by vote sheet a~ th~ request ot the Ao Co ot So, ~· ~lfint ot the Al"llij'o 

2ci It is requested tti..at vota..ihfeit :replies be fQrwardec\ to 

t!ie Secretariat not later thsn Tund.11• 17 i'ehruar,; 19S3o 

&icloeure 

Mmio tnn A.c. ot SQI. G-=>2 to 

Acting iwtcutive Secretary t USCIB 

dat11td S Feb S3, subject as abov~ 

USCIB: 1'/"Jrb 

f 

.-

TOP sE<!RET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-18-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

• 
llf .. '«. 

S Feb19" 

IDll>IAllD1 FOR: 'lHB ACTING BIBCU!lVB SICRl'lm, USCD 

SUB.JEC!: Recpest tor USCD Appiioval Of Parieclaplea Courier 

Sel"dce tor Code Word Material 

1. In ~ w:l.th the :t:;1 ..ng. eatablum.nt ot an AllD7 880 station at Baples to ~ service to lleaclquanva, 

Wied Forces Southern lurope ( E , t ··~ aona1dencl t.bat SACIUB 

ahoul.d haft aYa1lable a direct eota'ier l'OUt.e lzaa Parle to Jtaplea, 

over which he could pouch to APSE, on a med-to-Jmow bule, wch aode 

1fOZ'd •terial as carmot conYeDientq be aent ·b.r electronic means, auch 

u basic ord.Va ot battle. 

2o The most appropriate courier route tor tbie parpoee 1• con° 

eiderecl to be the Department ot State Parie-ltaples\courier pouch 

eenice. The pou.ch, acccmpanied by courier, goes v1- Rom to tbe u.s. 

Consulate, laplea, which :le quite near the location ot the proposed 

SSO station. There are a1x TOP SECRBT pouch deliveries a week, and 

he time tor each del:l:ver.r is tw clap. 

CODS eNd tba Hcurity •aeurea 

• on e rou e are equal to those on .routes carrentq approVed 

by USCIB tor pouching code .ol'd aterial. EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

4.o An alternate route, which ia lee• Md.table tor SHAPE 'bllt.. 

which could serve u a lltanclbJ' or tll19rgenq route, 111 the CDCIJEUl 

London•Paria (Ol'q n.elcl)-laplee air cour1ez' route,. "1th tlighta twice 

a week. 

S. It is :reccmnended that USOIB &ppl'Ove (1) the Deparl;Mnt of 

state Paria...Uaples courier pouch service for the tranud.saion of code 

mrcl material. and (2) t.he CDCNELll LondonoParieeRapl.ea air courier 

route as an alternate roate t'or emergenq use. 

6. It is r equated that tbis M1110randmn be distributed to USCIB 

msnbera with vote sheet tor approval and/or conmentao 

(Signed) 

a. C. PARTRIDGE 

Major Oenaral. OS 

A. C. of s. • G-2 

Imcloaure with USCIB 13/3P}f() p PeS'I C!'R E T
# CE2004084EN.01091402.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/914 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/914

---

(2004/C 84 E/1011)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0925/04

by Franz Turchi (UEN) to the Commission

(26 March 2004)

Subject:   Medical treatment for haemophilia sufferers

Subject:

Haemophilia, a hereditary and congenital disease characterised by uncontrolled bleeding, is still incurable despite the enormous progress of genetic engineering and biotechnology. Tailored drugs for alleviating its effects on sufferers are extremely expensive, and the conditions of those drugs' use are not the same across the EU Member States.

This disease causes severe physical pain from the first year of age, and leads to irreversible paralysis if it is no treated at a tender age with the above-mentioned drugs.

Can the Commission state whether, after enlargement, the new Member States will have sufficient stocks of the drugs concerned to meet needs, or whether there will be significant variations in their use?

Answer given by Mr Liikanen on behalf of the Commission

(29 April 2004)

(29 April 2004)

Advances in genetic engineering and biotechnology are helping to improve the treatment of many diseases and the latest progress is encouraging. This is the case for medicinal products used in the treatment of haemophilia.

In principle, the Commission does not see a particular reason for concern in relation to the accessibility to medicinal products for the treatment of this disease after enlargement. On the contrary, in accordance with the European centralised system for the authorisation of medicinal products, as established by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2309/93 of 22 July 1993 laying down Community procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (1), medicinal products authorised on this basis will be accessible to the market in the new Member States under the same conditions of use as in the rest of the EU. The way in which haemophilia is treated in the Member States is a national responsibility and therefore there could be variations in treatment practice.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 214, 24.8.1993.

1

---
# CE2004078EN.01081401.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/814 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/814

---

(2004/C 78 E/0863)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3444/03

by Ilda Figueiredo (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(20 November 2003)

Subject:   Teaching Portuguese language and culture in the Netherlands

Subject:

Various Portuguese immigrants to the Netherlands have informed me that the Dutch Government wishes to abolish the subsidy for teaching Portuguese language and culture from 1 August 2004, thus jeopardising the teaching of the children of Portuguese residents of that country.

Portuguese is an official language of the European Union, and has one of the largest numbers of speakers in the world. What measures does the Commission intend to take in order to take due account of this situation, and guarantee that Portuguese citizens and their children are not discriminated against, and can continue to have free access to the teaching of Portuguese language and culture in the Netherlands?

Answer given by Mrs Reding on behalf of the Commission

(16 December 2003)

(16 December 2003)

Article 149 of the EC Treaty stipulates that the Member States are responsible ‘for the content of teaching and the organisation of education systems’. The Commission is therefore unable to take any action regarding the situation referred to by the Honourable Member.

However, by virtue of the powers conferred on it, the Commission is committed to promoting linguistic diversity and language learning. In July 2003, it adopted an action plan setting out the measures to be put in place at Community level in the period from 2004 to 2006 (1).

1

---

(1)  COM(2003)449 final.

1

---