alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-20-00365-CV

Trial Court Cause 

Number: 2020-19597

Style: Gregorius Brown

v Gloria L. Brown

Date motion filed*: August 10, 2021

Type of motion: Motion for En Banc Reconsideration

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? YES NO

Ordered that motion is:

Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

Denied

Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

Other: _____________________________________ 

Judge's signature: /s/ Sherry Radack

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly, Goodman, Landau, Hightower, Countiss, Rivas-Molloy, 

Guerra, and Farris

Date: October 28, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996<F1>         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          40,395                  14,539
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,644                  73,274
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                      29
<INVENTORY>                                        690                     947
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,790                  89,687
<PP&E>                                         517,029                 681,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                 169,363                 194,642
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 424,456                 576,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,681                  78,317
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           310                     313
<OTHER-SE>                                     348,607                 377,407
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   424,456                 576,945
<SALES>                                         45,906                 198,599
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,405                 202,572
<CGS>                                           20,860                  93,417
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,720                 137,453
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,448                  16,947
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,586                   3,684
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,651                  44,488
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,046                  14,962
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,605                  29,526
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,605                  29,526
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26                    1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25                    1.02
<FN>
<F1>No changes were noted for three months ended 3/31/96 nor the three months ended
9/30/96.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of Dawson Geophysical Company (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report), I, Christina W. Hagan, Executive Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: February 14, 2005
    /s/ Christina W. HaganChristina W. HaganExecutive Vice President,
Secretary, Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer -19-
\ 

OTG~ 20153¢2 APR 54 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

TOP SECRET CO~lTROL #')4~0-¢7832 

AQONNR : 1 ¢51~¢ 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86'-36/50 USC 3605 

• ...... · ... . 

TOP SECRET CONTROL 54~4~-87 

PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES 

COPY /z 0£ ~6 COPIES 

mr SE£1iUft· 2 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-09-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352\3 

aJ. F. ~ W.F' a FRI EDMAN 

Te*P SECRET.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 97-40056

Conference Calendar

__________________

DENNIS L. BARRETT,

 Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

NEWMAN LEE CONNER, Warden Federal

Correctional Institute,

 Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:96-CV-313

- - - - - - - - - -

June 18, 1997

Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Dennis L. Barrett, federal prisoner #06817-045, challenges

that the district court's dismissal of his petition for federal

habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for failure to exhaust

administrative remedies. His motion for a certificate of

appealability is DENIED as unnecessary. We have reviewed the

record and Barrett's contentions and we discern no abuse of
No. 97-40056

-2-

discretion. See Fuller v. Rich, 11 F.3d 61, 62 (5th Cir. 1994). 

Accordingly, we affirm for essentially the same reasons employed 
No. 97-40056

-3-

by the district court. Barrett v. Warden, F.C.I. Texarkana, No.

5:96cv313 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 31, 1996).

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO THE CRIMINAL

PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE :

:

:

: No. 52 7

CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL RULES

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24 th day of Decem ber , 2020, the Honorable Michael H. Sholley

,

Snyder and Union Counties , is hereby appointed as a member of the Criminal Procedural

Rules Committee for a term of six y ears, commencing January 1, 2021.
At Twin Creeks, the Juniper Carbon Regeneration Kiln has installeda hypochloritewet scrubber, which is equivalentto or better than any of the control devices at other facilities.The hypochloritematerial acts to chemically react with mercury, enhancing the performance of the scrubber, and increasing the removal rate for mercury. Lone Tree Reond Phoenix Twin Creeks



### 4.2.2 Capital and Energy Costs Existine Units. The Questionnaires submitted by precious metal mining facilities in Nevada with existing carbon regenerationkilnsprovided limited information about cost of controls. For this analysis, the estimated cost of mercury controls for wet scrubbers on carbon regeneration kilns is based on the cost estimate for the existing control system. At Twin Creeks, the wet scrubber was installed at the Juniper regenerationkiln in 1996, at a capital cost of $40,000. 

### In 2003, as a result of the Nevada Voluntary Mercury Control Program, an additional hypochlorite wet scrubber was added at a capital cost of $620,000. Given the escalationin capital costs, based on the 

### ENR Index, the escalation factors from 1996 and 2003 are 1.40 and 1.17, respectively, which translate into a 2007 capital cost of $56,000 and $725,000, respectively,for these units. Mill Carbon Regeneration Kiln Carbon Regeneration Kiln Juniper Carbon Regeneration Kiln

Table 11 summarizes capital costs for wet scrubbers and other control devices on carbon regeneration kilns at Nevada mining operations. 61 1 3,727 5,650 1450 1204 3000 240 275 70 572.16 2.27 23.89 Wet Scrubber Wet Scrubber Wet Scrubber, Hypochlorite Wet Scrubber
eeNPIBEIN'fIA:L (unclassifl.ml fil~J A68 7 67 

CLASSIFIED/NON-CLA.SSIFIED TRANSMITTAL and RECEIPT 

TO 

Mr. Wm. F • Friedma.n 

310 Second St. S.E. 

Washington 3, D.C. 

,r 

i .. 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

Washington 25, D.C. 

SERIAL OR CONTROL NUMBER 

R/D-03-0J.-59 

DATE 

4 May 1959 

t. IT IS REQUESTED THAT RECEIPT FOR THIS MATERIAL BE ACKNOWLEDGED BY EXECUTll\IG AND RETURNING THE 

BELOW RECEIPT. 

2. THIS LETTER MA y BE DOWNGRADED TO __ UN_CLAS __ s_IF_IE ___ n _________ WHEN ENCLOSURES ARE REMOVED. 

INCLOSURESI" 

Envelope No. 2. Containing the f'ollowing material: 

One folder containing 2 copies of' report by J. A. Meyer, COMINI' - - Hard 

Facts in the Cold Wa.r, and 6 letters. 

One folder on Ma.chine Identification of Words (5 reports and newspaper clippings) 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-11-2014 pursuant to E .0. 1352a
National Reconnaissance Office Satellite Destroyed

19 August 1998

A National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) satellite was destroyed when the Titan IV/A space 

launch vehicle carrying itself destructed 40 seconds into launch August 12.

"Whenever we lose one of these valuable assets, it creates a void in our capabilities that poses a 

serious national concern and seriously affects our ability to accomplish our reconnaissance 

mission," said NRO spokesman Rick Oborn. 

Meanwhile, the NRO is working closely with its partners and customers to compensate for the 

loss and still provide the space-gathered intelligence to accomplish their missions. The NRO 

remains committed to providing this nation with the world's best space-based reconnaissance 

capability and looks toward planned future increased abilities expected as new systems come on 

line during the next several years.

There were no injuries or property damage and the cause of the explosion is under investigation.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Iteris, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James S. Miele, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ JAMES S. MIELE             |   |
|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|   |  James S. Miele           |
|   |  Chief Financial  Officer |
|   |                           |
|   |                           |
|   | February 8, 2006          |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or anyother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 37 (Wednesday, February 25, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 10165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03903]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-271-LA-2; ASLBP No. 15-937-02-LA-BD01]


Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and Entergy Nuclear 
Operations, Inc.; Establishment of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission, see 37 FR 28,710 (Dec. 
29, 1972), and the Commission's regulations, see, e.g., 10 CFR 2.104, 
2.105, 2.300, 2.309, 2.313, 2.318, 2.321, notice is hereby given that 
an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (Board) is being established to 
preside over the following proceeding: Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, 
LLC, And Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Vermont Yankee Nuclear 
Power Station).
    This proceeding involves an application by Entergy Nuclear Vermont 
Yankee, LLC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. for a license 
amendment for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station, which is 
located in Vernon, Vermont. In response to a notice filed in the 
Federal Register, see 79 FR 73,106 (Dec. 9, 2014), a hearing request 
was filed via the Electronic Information Exchange on February 9, 2015 
by the State of Vermont through the Vermont Department of Public 
Service.
    The Board is comprised of the following administrative judges:

Paul S. Ryerson, Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
Dr. Michael F. Kennedy, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
Dr. Richard E. Wardwell, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed 
in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule. See 10 .FR 2.302.

    Rockville, Maryland February 19, 2015.
E. Roy Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 2015-03903 Filed 2-24-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
, . ..., - -1' < 

.......
ex4-1.htm


    EXHIBIT
4.1


      NOT VALID
UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED BY TRANSFER AGENT

      INCORPORATED
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF UTAH

                                                                                                                                                          

       

      
        	 NUMBER 	
                 SHARES

              


      

       

      AUTO
STAR, INC.

      


      AUTHORIZED
COMMON STOCK

      100,000,000
SHARES

      PAR VALUE
$.001

      


      


      THIS
CERTIFIES THAT
____________________________________________________________

      


      IS THE
RECORD HOLDER OF
________________________________________________________

      


      Fully paid and non-assessable shares
of AUTO STAR, INC., Common Stock of

      transferable
on the books of the Corporation in person or by attorney upon surrender of this
Certificate duly endorsed or assigned. This Certificate and the shares
represented hereby are subject to the laws of the State of Utah, and to the
Articles of Incorporation and By-laws of the Corporation, as now or hereafter
amended. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer
Agent

      


      Witness
the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly
authorized officers.

      


      Dated:

      


       

      
        	 ______________________ 	
                 ______________________

              
	 Secretary   	
                 President                                  

              


      

       

                                                                                                    

                                                                                                  


      Corporate
Seal
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)
       OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Interactive Data
Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Steven G. Crane, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 15, 2004                      /s/ STEVEN G. CRANE
                                           ------------------------------
                                           Steven G. Crane
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           (principal accounting officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the periodic report of Dawson Geophysical Company (the
"Company") Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christina W. Hagan, Senior Vice President, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d);
          and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated:  January 23, 2004               /s/ Christina W. Hagan
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Senior Vice President, Treasurer,
                                       Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Jeffrey S. Mathiesen, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Delphax Technologies Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.     Date August 11, 2004 /s/ Jeffrey S. MathiesenJeffrey S. MathiesenVice President and Chief Financial Officer
Doc ID: 3552289
Doc ID: 3552289
Doc ID: 3552289
Doc ID: 3552289
Doc ID: 3552289
Doc ID: 3552289
Doc ID: 3552289
Doc ID: 3552289
Doc ID: 3552289
Doc ID: 3552289
Doc ID: 3552289
Doc ID: 3552289
Doc ID: 3552289
Doc ID: 3552289
Doc ID: 3552289
Doc ID: 3552289
Doc ID: 3552289
Doc ID: 3552289
Doc ID: 3552289
Doc ID: 3552289
Doc ID: 3552289
Doc ID: 3552289
Doc ID: 3552289
Date: Time: Location: Next Generation Aerial Services 1.) A complete pre - flight systematic check by the PIC of the Tarot X6’s physical cond ition, i.e. props, landing gear, position indicator lights, battery capacity and overall airframe condition. If any of the above are not within the manufacturers minimum standards no flight will take place until such time as the issue(s) is repaired to manufacturers standards. 2.) Written and/or electronic documentation of each physical inspection and repairs if any, by the PIC (pilot in command) will be kept with the Phantom and will be on - site and available for review. 3.) Software in relation to the Tarot X6 ’s operation will be checked for proper function. The most current DJI Assistant APP and the current firmware will be installed to as sure the most up to date safety features. 4.) Prior to every flight, the compass on the Tarot X6 will be calibrated as to ensure precision location. 5.) Droneview will ensure the altimeter setting on the Tarot X6 is that of AGL (above ground level) rather than GP S or barometric pressure derived settings. 6.) Every safety feature offered through the DJI Naza V2 will be enabled for every flight, every time. Additions to the checklist as deemed warranted by the PIC and the Observer/Spotter as warranted by the flight, area, weather conditions etc.

_________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________ __________________

_________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________