alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
July 20, 2015

Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch – Attn: Red Hill

Hawai’i Department of Health

919 Ala Moana Boulevard #212

Honolulu, HI  96814

Proposed Administrative Order on Consent ‐ Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility

Aloha.  Conservation Council for Hawai‘i submits the following comments on the proposed 

Administrative Order on Consent for the U.S. Navy’s fuel storage facility at Red Hill, O‘ahu.

The proposed AOC lacks specific remedies, solutions, and deadlines, including benchmarks 

to measure progress toward the final goal of replacing the fuel storage tanks.  The Navy, 

Hawai‘i Department of Health, and the Environmental Protection Agency continue to put a 

significant source of drinking water on O‘ahu at risk. 

We urge the State and the EPA to require the Navy to replace the existing fuel tanks with 

modern fuel tanks that meet regulatory standards within the next 5 years.  The Navy can 

afford to do this immediately, but chooses to continue putting our drinking water at risk by 

nickel and diming replacement tanks and solutions to the problem.  The Navy should also 

be required to install monitoring wells to detect any fuel leaks in the future. If the Navy 

chooses not to do so, it should find another location outside Hawai‘i to operate.  

We would also like to see the Navy become more active conservation partner in the islands 

by taking environmental protection more seriously, taking more seriously responsibility 

for its actions, and cleaning up its messes.  Kaho‘olawe is a classic example of the Navy’s

actions in Hawai‘i and failure to clean up its mess in the islands.  In addition, the Navy 

conducts sonar and other military training in the islands, including strafing Ka‘ula – a small 

Hawaiian Island to the southwest of Ni‘ihau – and international training exercises during 

RIMPAC.  All of these activities threaten, harm, or kill native species, and the Navy should 

be required to mitigate the losses.  

The Hawai‘i Department of Health and EPA have a mandatory duty to protect our drinking 

water, soil, and health.  We look forward to seeing a more rigorous AOC.  Mahalo nui loa or 

the opportunity to comment.

Sincerely,

Marjorie Ziegler
REF ID:A522615 

• lENl A l\'lt 

U.K.-U.S. CONFERENCE ON FRENCH COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY 

MINUTES OF 

THE FIRST MEETING OF THE EX~CUTIVE COMMITTEE 

The First Meeting of the U.K.-U.S. Conference on 

French Communications Security was held at 1430 on 1 ~Jay 

1951, in Room 1212, U.S. Naval Security Station, 

Washington, D. c. 

United Kingdom United States 

The Executive Committee 

._~~B-r_i_g_a_d_i_e_r __ J_o_v_n_··-H~.---.T~l ...... Jtman 

R.Adm. Earl E. Stone, Chairman 

Colonel S. P. Collins 

Lt. Colonel F. Collins 

Mr. Winston Scott 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Mr. R. F. Packard 

Mr. W. F. Friedman 

Secretariat 

Mr. H. D. Jones 

Lt. J. W. Pearson, USN 

At the suggestion of the Chairman, the members engaged 

in an open exchange of views on the various aspects of the 

general problem, including time, level, and method of approach, 

to the French, possible extent of disclosure, cryptographic 

systems which might be involved, possible reactions by the 

French, etc. 

This discussion was essentially an expression of viewpoints by the representatives in an effort to determine bases 

for a more specific line of approach to the problems to be 

considered. 

fOH~SEe-~ -·. " L ri1! Rf I 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-03-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
•. 

REF ID: A522..§...15 

• 

As a result of the open discussion the areas of U.K. and 

U.S. thinking on the manner of approach and the question of 

timing became more clearly defined. 

With regard to the technical aspects of the problem, it 

was agreed that the Technical Committee would proceed with 

discussions at 0900, 2 May 1951, giving primary consideration 

to the preparation of a cryptographic plan which might 

reasonably be acceptable to the French. 

It was also agreed that the remaining members of the 

Executive Committee would meet at 0900, 2 May 1951, for 

further consideration of terms of reference for the Security 

Committee. 

The meeting adjourned at 1635.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498

 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Heavy-Duty Hybrid Onboard Diagnostics

FROM: Amy Kopin

TO: The Docket

DATE: July 21, 2011

On March 28th, 2011 we held a conference call with Lisa A. Stegink of the Engine 

Manufacturers Association (EMA)to discuss concerns raised by members of EMA regarding 

heavy-duty onboard diagnostic (OBD) requirements and timing. EMA members raised concerns 

during the comment period for the heavy-duty greenhouse gas notice of proposed rulemaking that 

heavy-duty hybrid applications may not be able to meet the 2013 heavy-duty OBD regulations 

that were published in the 2009 OBD Final Rulemaking. 1,2Specifically, their comments include 

a request for a delay of the application of HD OBD requirements for hybrid applications until 

2020. Attendees from the EPA included Cleophas Jackson, Anthony Neam, and Amy Kopin.

 

1 U.S. EPA, NHTSA, and DOT, “Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Mediumand Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles,” republished December 29, 2010. Available here: 

http://origin.www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-12-29/html/2010-32726.htm

2 U.S. EPA, “Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicles Engines; Final Rule 

Regulations Requiring Onboard Diagnostic Systems on 2010 and Later Heavy-Duty Engines Used in Highway 

Applications Over 14,000 Pounds; Revisions to Onboard Diagnostic Requirements for Diesel Highway Heavy-Duty 

Vehicles Under 14,000 Pounds,” published February 24, 2009. Available here: 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/im/obd/regtech/hd-obd-frm-02-24-09-notice-74-fr-8310.pdf

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION
" . 

USCIB: ';JJ.1/28 

13 J~ 1954. 

'f6P SEC!tlt 

MEMORANDUM FOR '!HE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Program to Improve the Cononunications Security ot 

NATO Countries. 

Reference: USCIB ;?!J.1/27 dated 6 J~ 1954. 

1. The responses of the members in reply to the reterence 

indicate no objection to release of TYPEX 22 to the French by the U~K. 

2. Several members had reservations on the matter ot approving 

in principle the proposal for U.K. monitoring ot French comrmmications 

tor CCMSEC purposes and expressed a desire tor mor~ information on the 

French requirement together with concrete proposals tor the.specific 

arrangements designed to tultill it • 

.3. According'.cy', the reply se~ forth in the enclosure hereto was 

furnished to the SUKLO, Washington, by the Executive Secretary, USCIB. 

USCIB 

Enclosure 

, CIB II 000205 dtd 1.3 J~ 1954. 

USCIB: ';JJ.1/28 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-18-l014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

TBP SECRET 

24 
. 'l0P SEetmT 

UNITED STATES CCIOOJNICATIONS lHTELLIGl!MCE BOARD 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN 

CIB # 000205 

13 Ju:cy- 1954 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE SENIOR U.K. LIAISON OFFICER, WASHINGTON: 

Subject: CCMSEC Assistance to the French. 

1. The U.S. element ot the Canbined Wor~ing Grou;p tor Improvement 

of NATO Camnunications Security has informed USCIB that the C\'G approve 

and recamm.end release of the U.K. TIPEX 22 to the French. The United 

States Communications Intelligence Board consents to such release. 

2. At the same time USCIB was asked it it would approve in 

principle the U .. K. monitoring of French communications at French request tor CGMSEC purposes subject to further USCIB consideration ot 

such concrete proposals along these lines as might be present8d by" the 

U.K. element ot the CW. In acting on this question the Board decided 

to keep the matter under advisement pending presentation to it of the 

precise nature or the French requirement together with the manner in 

which it is proposed that it should be fulfilled • 

. 3. For your own information, the reactions o:r· the members of the 

Board to these proposals indicate to me that arrangements which would 

not obtain substantial agreement of the U.S. element of the C\G would 

be unlik:~ to meet with USCIB approval.. 

(SIGNED) 

RUFUS L. TAYLOR 

Captain, U. S. Navy 

Executive Secretary, USCIB 

cc: Chairman, U.S. Ad Hoc Committee 

for Improvement of NATO COMSEC. 

:Enclosure with USCIB 2!J.l/28 dtd lJ J~ 1954. 

lDP SECRET 

i
REF ID:A61453 

TOP SECRET 

'l'OP SE6ltE'l' - tJ.S. E1"l!iS ONLY 

SUBJECT. NUMBER 

USCIB: 2$_./8 Item 3 of the Agenda for the 21st Meeting of USCIBEC, 

held on 22 October 1954. 

Subject: Procedure for Handling Intercept Base Rights Problems. 

THE CHAIRMAN recalled that he had submitted a paper on this problem 

(USCIB 29./3), and added that the Defense member has come up more 

recently with recommendations (USCIB 29./6) which appear to provide a 

reasonable solution to the problem. He asked if there were any objections to adoption of the Defense paper. 

In the ensuing discussion the members considered the Defense proposal and agreed that it should be amended as follows: 

1. Change paragraph lB(l) to read as follows: 

11USCIB, as the National Policy Board for COMINT, is concerned, 

among other things, with: 11 

2. Paragraph lB(l)(a); line 2: delete "where" and substitute 

11 since 11 • 

3. Paragraph lB(l): insert new subparagraph (d), as follows: 

11 (d) Insuring that information about COMINT activities is 

handled in COMINT channels in accordance with existing USCIB 

policy. II 

4. Change paragraph 1B(5) to read as follows: 

11 (5) The Secretary of Defense, as the Executive Agent of the 

Government for COMINT production, is responsible for review 

or approval of the initial requirements and for assuring 

(a) the inclusion, where a de!ense installation is involved, 

of COMINT requirements in the swmnaries prepared by JCS, and 

(b) the necessary coordination among the member agencies 

involved in the development and implementation of the requirement." 

Following agreement on the above changes the members discussed 

the composition of the Ad Hoc Committee. 

In that members representing CIA, Army, and Navy desired membership on this Committee it was agreed to broaden the representation as 

originally reconunended by the Defense member (vj.z, State, NSA, and Air 

USCIB: 29 ./S - 6 -

TOP SECRET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 09-26-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352\3 
REF ID:A61453 

1VP S"ECR:Er 

':FOP SEiORi!i'f - l:J. S. EYBS ONLY 

USCIB: 29 ./8 

Force). The composition of the Ad Hoc Committee as ultimately agreed 

is as follows: 

OGA 

NSA - Mr. Madison E. Mitchell, Chairman 

ARMY - Mr. Richard Battey 

NAVY - Commander W. L. Thomas 

AIR FORCE - Major J. Craig Teller 

STATE - Mr. R, F. Pack;ar4./orMr. 

CIA - I .... _____ ____.J 

R. G. Walker 

It was a.greed, further, that the Committee report shoulq be prepared for consideration at the next:. regular meeting of USCIBEC. 

DECISION: (22 October 1954) USCIBEC approved the recomm~dations 

contained in USCIB 29./6, subject to the amendments indicated in the 

foregoing discussion. It was agreed that the Ad Hoc Committee report 

should be prepared in time for consideration at the next regular 

meeting of USCIBEC. 

This item to be continued on the agenda. 

USCIB: 29./8 - 7 -

'F<>P SECRET
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 COUNTY OF QUAY,

3 Plainitff-Appellee,

4 v. NO. A-1-CA-36413

5 LEE STONE and DUSTY STONE,

6 Defendants-Appellants.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF QUAY COUNTY

8 David P. Reeb, Jr., District Judge 

9 Jonlyn Martinez

10 Albuquerque, NM 

11 for Appellee

12 Dusty Stone

13 San Jon, NM 

14 Lee Stone

15 San Jon, NM

16 Pro Se Appellants

17 MEMORANDUM OPINION

18 VANZI, Chief Judge.
2

1 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has

3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

4 {2} DISMISSED.

5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 __________________________________

7 LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 _________________________________

10 STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge

11 _________________________________

12 EMIL J. KIEHNE, Judge
... 

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

14 APR 1954 

!OP Sfi8R:l!Ji' FRO'ff I 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

SUBJECT: 

REFERENCE: 14/82, 3 May 1950 

14/83, 9 June 1950 

14/87, 9 August 1950 

eo 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

1. In the course of the discussions in 1945 which resulted 

in the BRUSA Agreement, as set forth in the Minutes of\the 5th 

meeting of ANCIB, agreement apparently was reached\ that while 

complete partnership was a basic principle for the \contemplated 

collaboration, certain special tasks might be regarded by either 

party as purely domestic concems, and thus outside the sco e of 

the a reem.ent. In this connection 

endan 

Enclosure with USCIB 14.ll/l dtd 16 Apr 1954. 

TOP SECRET FRDTI I 

h 

approved for 

elease by NSA on 03-05-2014 

ursuantto E.O. 13526 
' "' 

'!'OP 6Ei0Rm' FROTH 

~m=~p11 lj)P SECr\:c 1 1in:u 1 n 9 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

(Signed) 

HUNTINGTON D. SHELDON 

- 2 -

TOP SECRET FROTI I
Exhibit
10.4


 


Via Messenger, Fax and Email


 


October 10,
2008


 


Lehman
Brothers. Inc. acting as Agent


Lehman
Brothers OTC Derivatives Inc.


Transaction
Management


745
Seventh Avenue, 28th Floor


New
York, New York  10019


Attn:  Documentation Manager


 


Re:  Confirmation dated April 17,
2007, between Lehman Brothers OTC


Derivatives Inc. and Lawson Software, Inc.


Convertible Note Hedge Transaction


Notice of Early Termination Date


 


Ladies
and Gentlemen:


 


We
refer to the Confirmation dated April 17, 2007 (the “Confirmation”),
entered into between Lehman Brothers OTC Derivatives Inc. (“Party A”) and
Lawson Software, Inc. (“Party  B”). Capitalized terms used
herein but not defined herein have the meaning assigned in the Confirmation.


 


We
hereby notify you of an Event of Default pursuant to Section 5(a)(vii) of
the Agreement, due to Party A’s bankruptcy filing on October 5, 2008.


 


As
a result of such Event of Default, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
Agreement, Party B as the non-defaulting party hereby designates October 10, 2008 as the “Early Termination Date” in
respect of the Transaction.


 


As
soon as reasonably practicable, Party B will provide Party A with a
statement of the calculation of Party B’s loss under the Agreement made
pursuant to Section 6(e) of the Agreement.


 


Nothing
contained in this letter shall be deemed to waive, release or impair any right
or remedy which the undersigned may have pursuant to the above referenced
agreements or which are otherwise available at law or equity, all of which are
expressly retained by the undersigned.


 


	
   

  	
  Lawson
  Software, Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  Bruce B. McPheeters

  
	
   

  	
  Its:

  	
  Corporate Secretary and
  Senior Vice President
# CE2004084EN.01045401.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/454 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/454

---

(2004/C 84 E/0529)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1064/04

by André Brie (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(6 April 2004)

Subject:   Inconsistencies relating to the reconstruction of the road S 282 A in the Free State of Saxony

Subject:

I would like to draw the Commission's attention to problems relating to the reconstruction of the Land-administered road S 282 A in the Free State of Saxony. These problems have been the subject of a petition to the European Parliament (364/2000), which was registered on 25 May 2000 and last discussed by the Committee on Petitions on 20 February 2003. The Committee is still awaiting the information requested from the relevant authorities in Germany.

Over the four years since the petition was submitted and during which the road S 282 A was completed, an increasing number of conflicting pieces of information have come to light.

Firstly, contradictory statements have been made with regard to the cost.

In a letter of 23 May 2003 to Mr Nino Gemelli (Chairman of the Committee on Petitions), the German ambassador Dr Schönfelder (Permanent Representation of Germany to the EU) confirmed that the extension of the road S 282 A would cost EUR 50 million, referring to information from German authorities.

In a letter of 19 May 2003 to Mr Iltgen, President of Saxony's state parliament, the total cost of constructing the road was estimated by Saxony's State Minister of Economic Affairs and Labour at EUR 4,63 million. Just a few weeks later (on 4 July 2003), in reply to the same question, the Minister informed Mr Iltgen that the cost would be only EUR 4,3 million.

In addition, it is suspected that the reconstruction of the road S 282 A was intentionally declared to be an ‘extension’ although this was not the case, as only one year after the road was completed it was downgraded from the original ‘supraregional’ category (classification II) to the ‘regional’ category (classification III).

Can the Commission state whether and to what extent it is aware of these conflicting facts and, if it is not aware of them, whether it intends to carry out on-the-spot investigations?

Answer given by Mr Franz Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(20 April 2004)

(20 April 2004)

The Commission is collecting the information it needs to answer the question. It will communicate its findings as soon as possible.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1998 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          31,314
<SECURITIES>                                    33,295
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,163
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,399
<INVENTORY>                                     17,403
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100,741
<PP&E>                                          23,634
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,832
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 144,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,788
<BONDS>                                            150
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           314
<OTHER-SE>                                     119,020
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,334
<SALES>                                         91,641
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,641
<CGS>                                           52,320
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   89,760
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   838
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 780
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,751
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,021
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,730
<DISCONTINUED>                                     943
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                     (10,103)
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,570
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .88
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Riggs National
Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Steven T. Tamburo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company. By:
    
    /s/ STEVEN T. TAMBUROName:
    
    Steven T. TamburoChief Financial Officer
August 6, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission Advisory Committee on Small and Emerging Companies will hold a public meeting on Wednesday, March 4, in Multi-Purpose Room LL-006 at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC.

                    The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. (EDT) and will be open to the public. Seating will be on a first-come, first-served basis. Doors will open at 9:00 a.m. Visitors will be subject to security checks. The meeting will be webcast on the Commission's Web site at                     *www.sec.gov.*

On February 17, 2015 the Commission published notice of the Committee meeting (Release No. 33-9724), indicating that the meeting is open to the public and inviting the public to submit written comments to the Committee. This Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a majority of the Commission may attend the meeting.

                    The agenda for the meeting includes matters relating to rules and regulations affecting small and emerging companies under the federal securities laws.                          ( print page 10733)    

For further information, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: February 25, 2015.

Jill M. Peterson,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-04264 Filed 2-25-15; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
LUST Program - Utah

1991 1996 2001 2006 2011

Active tanks 12882 5186 4188 4065 3861

Closed tanks 4521 9755 12088 12739 13321

Cleanups initiated 464 2380 3510 4200 4527

cleanups completed 143 1941 3170 3796 4195

New cleanups/5 yrs 1916 1130 690 327

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

Active tanks

Closed tanks

Cleanups initiated

cleanups completed

Source: US EPA UST Performance Measures

http://www.epa.gov/oust/cat/camarchv.htm

1/13/2012

0

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015