alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
'i'OP SBSRM' = l:J. 5 • El'£lliS ON:OY 

REF ID:A61422-

r0:£" SECR:ET 

SUBJECT NUMBER 

USCIB: 21.5/4 Item 2 of the Agenda for the 21st Meeting of USCIBEC 1 

held on 22 October 1954. 

Subject: u.s.J 

(USC b 29.5/Z). 

THE CHAIRMAN invited attention to the two recommendations contained 

in paragraph 4 of the paper submitted by the NSA member and asked if 

there were any comments. 

MR. POLYZOIDES stated that his Department is wholeheartedly in 

favor of the project, but recommended that the matter be handled through 

military rather than diplomatic channels. 

The members agreed. 

On the question of designation of an Executive Agent it was recom.-

mended by Lt. Colonel Leffers that the Army be designated Executive 

Agent, particularly since General Hull is involved. 

CAPTAIN AGNEW stated that NSA is willing for the Army to be 

Executive Agent with the understanding that technical guidance will be 

provided by NSA. 

The members agreed. 

DECISION: (22 October 1954) USCIBEC agreed to recommepdUSCIB approval 

of the proposals qontained in USCIB 29.5/.2 subject to the rnderstanding 

(1) that the recommended approach to the I . will be made 

through military (CINCFE) rather than diplomatic channels., and (2) that 

the Anrry be designated the Executive Agent for these negotiations, and 

that the Director, NSA provide the technical guidance required. 

This item to be dropped from the agenda. 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

USCIB: 29.5/4 - 5 -

TOP SECRET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-18-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B
Doc ID: 6784026
Doc ID: 6784026
Doc ID: 6784026
Doc ID: 6784026
Doc ID: 6784026
Doc ID: 6784026
Doc ID: 6784026
Doc ID: 6784026
Doc ID: 6784026
Doc ID: 6784026
Doc ID: 6784026
Doc ID: 6784026
Doc ID: 6784026
Doc ID: 6784026
Doc ID: 6784026
Doc ID: 6784026
-

~-

•-

.... 

-----

~ --

-

t;· 

... 

--

l 

RE~_ ID :A68204 

-~ 

-D.-. lf. 'Po. ~~ 

*1t_1\of'Qf~~~ OfflN--~ \he ~- - or ~ 

~b

-~A~~ D.e .. _ 

.. lob1 

F ,--

St:Mals oo~""".!>~ 

"'"2._ ~ ~ \.s <... 

·-·: ·11,..i ~- ~ oo_N ot k. incitrotl•=.; s~ tei!oh he ;..re?Arcd 

..id- itV ~~~t. QA! -;tilcb !~a~ ot h!:a ~ ;oncerni,r ~ \."le 

--~-/Ai~~-~ ~ .. crt~- !;_"-~ ~~11 Di~ a:st..1bli <;br.Jont ot 

- - --· ~ -- -- __ q - . ~. -

Ii ir*9l"U 19- an oamrtwtl.t..v Daloro -,our~ ncl }~'"iday. ,: .-.14 ~ ·~w d1soi1$:11.r~ the r.a;iar id.th 1'Jrl Ind it -

==' \* not. iPt W:!!~ °"''~" or tJie ~~c;r qt ohr att~. lit ~ di#'JSB it ~"9r !lo~.J a\ th9 Cl~..._ (tf'_1 &<J a lut 

r I 't:\1.k at)(f'.it l\ in zn.iitabla cllseuisad lcc..aa~ rli tale~~.,,. - - .... • ...=.ft ·- - - ... 

?1IU& &\ft ~ • q..U lf.4~ ;:Til ~~ ~ t.llf n;~. 

' 

-. -

~.: 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-13-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 

' -~ 

----

:m 

~-... 

-

I 

---.. -

--

-

~
# GUYSE L COMMERCIA L PROPERTIES . LL C 620 6 Wes t Sagina w Hwy . • Suit e A • Lansing , M l 4891 7 Phon e (517 ) 327-009 9 • Fa x (517 ) 323-167 8 

### ERARTMENTO F •ANSPORWiO N ;K[ T OPERATION S 

### m i FE B 

### ; S 

### P 3 : 

### I U February? , 201 2 Docke t Managemen t

Facilit y U S Dep t o f Transportatio n Docke t No . FAA-2012-008 9 _1200-Ne w Jerse y Ave^S E — Wes t Buildin g Gran dFloor , Roo mW-12014 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 RE : Sun Country slo t

exemptio n Docke t

NO . FAA-2012-008 9 T o Who mI t

Ma y Concern : I a mwritin g t o as k

tha t yo u allo w Su n Country Airline s t o continu e to offe r servic e betwee n Lansing , Michigan an dWashington , DC s Reagan Nationa l Airport . I hav e adaughte r that ha s bee n attendin g la w schoo l in Washington , D C an dsh e ha s use dth e flight o n numerou s occasions . M y wif e andI hav e als o use dth e servic e o n acoupl e o f occasions . I t ha s appeare dt o u s that

th e flight s hav e bee n agrea t succes s fo

r ou r local regiona l airport . I

t ha s bee n astruggl e fo r

th e Capito l City o f

Michigan t o provid e relevan t servic e t o it s potential customer s s o th e new s that

Su n Country wa s goin g t o ope n u p th e D C flight s ayea r ag o was announce dwit

h grea t fanfare . I hop e tha t th e power s tha

t b e wil l giv e seriou s consideratio n to allowin g Su n Country t o maintai n its"service'to~Reagan~National. ~ - —_ - - ——^ - --^-- ^

Ti mGuysel m

r w' ^
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 2, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-20387

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PEDRO MADRIGAL-FERREIRA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-02-CR-669-ALL

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Pedro Madrigal-Ferreira appeals his sentence following his

guilty plea conviction of illegal reentry. Madrigal first argues

that the district court erred in considering higher offense

levels, as opposed to higher criminal history categories, when it

departed upward based upon a dismissed count pursuant to U.S.S.G.

§ 5K2.21. This court has not addressed the issue whether a

sentencing court must depart horizontally when departing pursuant
No. 03-20387

-2-

to § 5K2.21; thus, Madrigal has not shown that the district court

plainly erred in so doing. See United States v. Hull, 160 F.3d

265, 271-72 (5th Cir. 1998). 

Second, Madrigal asserts that, because the written judgment

does not conform to the court’s oral pronouncement of the

sentence, this case must be remanded to the district court for it

to amend the written judgment by striking the condition of

release that Madrigal not possess any other dangerous weapon. 

This court recently addressed this same issue and rejected it. 

See United States v. Torres-Aguilar, ___ F.3d ___, No. 03-40055,

2003 WL 22853762 (5th Cir. Dec. 3, 2003). Accordingly, the issue

is foreclosed. 

AFFIRMED.
## Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re Raymond Gilbert

No. 06

- 19

- 00115

- CR Original Mandamus Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice

Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice

Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the petition for writ of mandamus

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we d ismiss the petition.

RENDERED JUNE 24, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
# CE2004084EN.01066601.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/666 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/666

---

(2004/C 84 E/0751)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0735/04

by José García-Margallo y Marfil (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(11 March 2004)

Subject:   Funding of projects designed to transfer water from the Ebro river basin to southern and eastern parts of Spain

Subject:

How many projects relating to the transfer of water from the Ebro river basin to southern and eastern parts of Spain have been financed by means of the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(16 April 2004)

(16 April 2004)

Up to the present, the Commission has not taken a decision to support through the Cohesion fund or through the Structural Funds any project dealing with water transfer from the Ebro river to the East and South-Spanish zones.

The Spanish authorities have submitted four proposals for co-financing regarding this project that are currently being evaluated by the services of the Commission.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         241,461
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  237,385
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,520
<INVENTORY>                                     14,871
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,503,887
<PP&E>                                       3,643,210
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,871,414
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,743,658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,226,938
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,390,480
<COMMON>                                    17,153,344
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,743,658
<SALES>                                      1,276,904
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,312,143
<CGS>                                          658,631
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,691,361
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             119,174
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,379,218)
<DISCONTINUED>                             (4,927,146)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,306,364)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (8.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (8.84)
        

</TABLE>
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 00494**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  00494\00494_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 00494\00494_Part A.XLS Plant submitted survey file x 00494\00494_Part B.XLS Plant submitted survey file x 00494\00494_Part C.XLS Plant submitted survey file x 00494\00494_Part D.XLS Plant submitted survey file x 00494\00494_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

00494\Certification Statement_ 00494.pdf Plant certification statement x 00494\Support Documentation\00494_questions.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 00494\Support Documentation\Part A_revised.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 00494\Support Documentation\Part C_revised.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 00494\00494_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

00494\00494_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
I 

I 

Dear Pr. Friedmann, 

REF ID:A275386 

-/ , __,, 

10th Septe~ber, 1941. 

Af'ter a week's WA.it in ~·ontreal I md a safe passage home and ar.i Just beg1nn1ng now to d33cr1be rriy vun t to my 

colleagues who are nll axtremslJ iatere3teu. Tt 1 11 ll be 

some days before I c3.n get square i,;i th the worl< J.nd start 

to pass to you soma of the i11for1r.atl..on you requir·ed. 

I am extre-ie 1.: .:>orr;y th:'J t tl1e a rr1 val of 3tevens froM S1n2a~ orG rris been delayed so lon& but I feel it ria.~' give 

your staff an opportun1 ty of f' <;lose stiid.j of the T!later1al the~; aln~?.dy rove and I irvi SB ogni ne of your 0uc1;es.:> when 

the extra noter1~l and bacJ..r.ground reaches you. -.. 

I hope soon to rece1 ve frori :1ou a full descr19t1on 

of your nev method of ::ttt3.8k on the ~UJl cypher•s. Our 

people h'l.ve h.1.d D fe1r qrnount of sncC"ess and I fe'3l they vnll apprec1ote t1ns new line. 

I hope soon to hear of furth9r progreoo rnade by Jr. Fullback's party. 

Will you please g1 ve my greetings tc ~·rs. Fr1ed.f'lann 

and my trr~nks to h:r n.nc1 to you for your wn~' k1ndnosses 

during ny stay in Washington. 

Yours~~4 

~ .c~ .. _ .... :-, ~ 

11. F. Fri edrnan11, ~sq. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-15-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
USCIB: 4.2/51 

21 June 1955 

GQNFIBEN'f IAL 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Exception to Provisions of USCIB Directive No. 15. 

Reference: USCIB 4.2/48, dated 27 May 1955. 

1. No objection having been received to the reference, the USCIBEC 

decision reported therein is considered approved. 

2. Action will be taken by this office to amend CIBD #15 accordingly. 

USCIB 

USCIB: 4.2/51 

') ,· ._4
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 6016 8 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
WILLIAM WILBOURN , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:12

- CR

- 182

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and PRADO and HAYNES, Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM: *
William Wilbourn appeals from his conditional guilty plea conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon; the plea was conditioned upon Wilbourn’s reservation of his righ t to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress. The district court denied the motion, finding that Wilbourn had consented to the search of his residence. Alternatively, the district court determined that the search was justified as a p rotective sweep.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 26, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-60168 Document: 00512882539 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/26/2014No. 14

- 6016 8
Wilbourn, in his opening brief, does not address the district court’s protective sweep analysis. Although he addresses the issue in his reply brief, “[t] his court does not entertain arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief.” United States v. Ramirez, 557 F.3d 200, 203 (5th Cir. 2009)

. This court “will not raise and discuss legal issues that [ Wilbourn ] has failed to assert.” Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Because Wilbourn has not addressed the denial of his motion to suppress on the basis that the search was justified as a protective

sweep, he has abandoned the issue on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224

- 25 (5th Cir. 1993). Additionally, because the ruling presents an independent, unchallenged ground for the district court’s denial of the motion to suppress , we affirm the district court’s denial on that basis without addressing Wilbourn’s other arguments. See United States v. Thibodeaux , 211 F.3d 910 , 912 (5th Cir. 2000); see also United States v. Mitchell , 334 F. App’x 665, 665

- 66 (5th Cir. 2009) (holding that appellant abandoned, by failing to brief, any argument challenging the district court’s alternative holding that the good faith exception to t he exclusionary rule applied). AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 14-60168 Document: 00512882539 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/26/2014
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00142-CV

CITY OF LEON VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,

Appellant

v.

Larry LITTLE,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CI-17823

Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE MARION, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we WITHDRAW our opinion and 

order of June 19, 2013, and SUBSTITUTE this opinion and judgment. The trial court’s order is 

AFFIRMED. We tax costs of this appeal against Appellant City of Leon Valley Economic 

Development Corporation. 

SIGNED December 31, 2013.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
Exhibit 32B

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of AutoInfo,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  (SEC)  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  William
Wunderlich,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be  retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its staff upon
request.


/s/ William Wunderlich
----------------------
William Wunderlich
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

Date: August 8, 2007
Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of J Net Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Allan
R. Tessler, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May 14, 2004                 By: /s/ Allan R. Tessler
                                     ____________________________________
                                     Allan R. Tessler
                                     Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1460 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the Yellow Ribbon G.I. 

Education Enhancement Program to cover recipients of the Marine Gunnery Sergeant John David Fry scholarship, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2015 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. TILLIS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the Yellow 

Ribbon G.I. Education Enhancement Program to cover 

recipients of the Marine Gunnery Sergeant John David 

Fry scholarship, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fry Scholarship En5 hancement Act of 2015’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1460 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF YELLOW RIBBON G.I. EDUCATION 

2 ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3317(a) of title 38, 

4 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘in para5 graphs (1) and (2)’’ and inserting ‘‘in paragraphs (1), (2), 

6 and (9)’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to academic years 

9 beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints each of Robert K. Kretzman and Michael T. Sheehan or any of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the REVLON, INC. (the ‘‘Corporation’’) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the ‘‘Form 10-K’’) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any applicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents 13th day of March,  2007.

|        |  |  |               |
|--------|--|--|---------------|
| /S/    |  |  | PAUL J. BOHAN |
|   |  |  | PAUL J. BOHAN |
|        |

----
nCrOMMISSiONKRSSTATEOFMARYLANDDOUCL&,SR.M.NAZAREANCHAIRMANHAROLDD.WILLLAMSSUSANNEBROGANLAWRENCEBRENNERTHERESEM.GOLDSMETHPuBLIcSERVICECOMMISSIONJanuary25,2011TheHonorableRobertM.SummersActingSecretaryMarylandDepartmentoftheEnvironmentMontgomeryParkBusinessCenter1800WashingtonBoulevardBaltimore,Maryland21230DearSecretarySummers:ConfirmingthediscussionwithrepresentativesoftheEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyRegion111(EPA),andmembersofyourstaffandthePowerPlantResearchProgram(PPRP)onFebruary19,2011,theMarylandPublicServiceCommission(PSC)supportsyoureffortstoobtainEPAapprovaloftheMarylandStateImplementationPlan.InresponsetotheneedtoobtainacompletenessdeterminationforCertificateof(PublicConvenienceandNecessity(CPCN)applicationsasrequiredby40CFR§124,3,thepartiesshouldraisethisissuewiththePSCHearingExamineratthePrehearingSchedulingConference.TheHearingExaminerWillhearargumentandmakeadetermination,eitherorderingtheincompleteapplicationbesupplementedpriortothehearingormakingafindingontherecordthattheapplicationiscomplete.Concerningthenecessityfortimetoallowforresponsetopubliccomments,thepartiesshouldlikewiseraisethisissuewiththeHearingExamineratthePrehearingSchedulingConferencesothatadequatetimewillbeallowedintheSchedulingOrder.Inaddition,totheextentthishasnotbeenaccomplishedbythetimeaProposedOrderisissuedbytheHearingExaminer,thisshouldbebroughttotheCommission’sattentionbeforetheProposedOrderbecomesFinal.PleasefeelfreetoincludethisletterintheDepartment’sresubmissiontoEPAoftheMarylandStateImplementationPlan.IfIcanbeoffurtherassistance,pleasefeelfreetocontactme.Sincerely,H.RobertErwin,Jr.GeneralCounselWILIJAMDONALDSCHAEFERTOWER•6ST.PAULSTREET•ALTJMORE,MARYLAND2I2O268O6410.767-8000•TollFrcc:1400-492.0474•FAX:410-333-6495MORS:I-800-735-2258(TTY/Voice)‘Wcbtc:www,pscstalcmdus