alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004084EN.01017001.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/170 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/170

---

(2004/C 84 E/0209)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0179/04

by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(29 January 2004)

Subject:   National immigration plans

Subject:

In its endeavour to implement the decisions taken at the Council meeting in Tampere in 1999 concerning ‘a common asylum and migration policy’, the Commission requested the Member States to draw up and submit national migration plans.

Can the Commission answer the following:

| 1. | Have the Member States submitted their national migration plans? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Have the Member States submitted their national migration plans?

| 2. | Has the Greek Government submitted the Greek migration plan? If so, does the Commission have any comments to make in that respect? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Has the Greek Government submitted the Greek migration plan? If so, does the Commission have any comments to make in that respect?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(18 February 2004)

(18 February 2004)

In its Communication to the Council and the Parliament on an Open Method of Co-ordination for the Community Immigration Policy (1), the Commission set out its proposals for the adaptation of the open method of co-ordination in the field of migration policy.

1

The Honourable Member rightly points out that the instruments and methods proposed in this Communication (section 4) include the preparation and review of national action plans on immigration, on an annual basis.

Given that the Council has not yet endorsed the Commission's proposal to set up an open method of co-ordination for the Community immigration policy the operational phase of this method has not yet been launched and Member States have not been requested so far to submit national action plans on immigration.

However, in the context of a reinforced information exchange on national integration policies, launched by the Commission in 2003, Greece has submitted a national report on the integration of immigrants. This piece of information was referred to and commented upon in the recent Commission Communication on Immigration, Integration and Employment (2).

2

---

(1)  COM(2001) 387 final.

1

(2)  COM(2003) 336 final.

2

---
# CE2004084EN.01014501.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/145 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/145

---

(2004/C 84 E/0183)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-4075/03

by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(14 January 2004)

Subject:   Contracts of doctors working for the Greek Electricity Board (DEI)

Subject:

The Commission recently received a complaint from doctors working for the Greek Electricity Board (DEI) about the terms they are obliged to accept in order to work for this organisation. These doctors who are specialists in various fields worked for many years with ‘contracts for the provision of independent services’; after court rulings these have now been converted into ‘contracts for part-time dependent employment for an unlimited duration’. However, according to the conditions of the new contract provided by the DEI, they are not covered by the same DEI arrangements as regular and other staff and are excluded from pay increases due to promotions and from allowances, Christmas bonuses and other benefits provided for in Collective Employment Conditions or by law.

Will the Commission say whether the above terms communicated to the doctors by the DEI in respect of their new employment contract violate the provisions of Directive 97/81 (1) and in particular the principle of non-discrimination which is defined in Clause 4 and which provides that: ‘In respect of employment conditions, part-time workers shall not be treated in a less favourable manner than comparable full-time workers’?

1

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(24 February 2004)

(24 February 2004)

The written question deals with the issue of whether the Directive on part-time work (2) is breached by the granting of special contracts without certain additional benefits which are normally given to employees.

2

Greece has correctly transposed the part-time work Directive by Article 2 of Act No 2369 of 1 September 1998. The Greek legislation applies to the whole private sector and employment relations with public enterprises and other public sector bodies.

The Commission has not received any similar representations as regards violation of the nondiscrimination principle of the part-time work Directive in Greece.

Any alleged breach of the afore-mentioned Greek legislation should in the first instance be addressed to the competent Greek authorities and, in fact, the Commission is aware that the case in question has been brought before the Greek courts.

---

(1)  OJ L 14, 20.1.1998, p. 9.

1

(2)  Council Directive 97/81/EC of 15 December 1997 concerning the Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, OJ L 14, 20.1.1998.

2

---
- -- -------------

• Rf~63 

tBCIB: 5.2/88 

5 April 1955 

!§P@ffitft 

ltl?QANPYM FQR THE MEMBERS OF Il?CIB; 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Approval of the Minutes of the ll.3th *eting of tBCIB. 

tBCIB 5.2/86 of 24 1'il.rch· 1955. 

1. Subject to the. insertion or the attached corrected page in its 

appropriate place, and to the minor corrections listed below the Minutes 

of' the 113th M3eting of' tBCIB are approved. 

, ~age 12 - Delete the word "Proposed" in front of Secretary's 

Note. 

~es 20 and 21 - Change the name "Hal.lings" to "Hollings". 

~ge 23, Line 5 - Change "Cass~" to "Caccia". 

2. It is requested that the word TENTATIVE be deleted from the 

initial page of the minutes for each item considered and the word FINAL 

substituted therefor. 

Enclosure 

.Corrected page 15 of subject minutes. 

Correction Sheet. 

tBCIB: 5.2/88 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-28-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352\3 

TOP SECR£1=-

24 
• r 

'1'6P SBeRB'f e.s. BE 9!&.¥ 

OF THE 

QNITED STATE COMMQNIQATIOl'S INI'ELLIGENQE BOARD 

Page. Para 

of Fiilal. Cow 

Page 15, Para 4 

CQRRECTION SHEET 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

EO .3. 3 ( h) ( 2) · 

TiXT (Tentative and FINAL) 

.ImATIVE; 

FINAL: "Mt, ARM3TRONG noted that this is in fact a 

proposal for a limited third party arrangement, and said that in view of the delica1B 

arrangement under which this activity is 

conducted, a new approach should not be 

made until ratification of the Paris 

agreements." 

TOP SECRET
### From: Molly Johnson [MJJohnso@placer.ca.gov]

Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 2:56 PM

To: Krichevsky, Alex@ARB

Cc: Jane Bailey; Todd Nishikawa Subject: Rule 245

Attachments: Rule 245 Signed Resolution.pdf; Rule 245 Proof of Publication.pdf; Rule 245 Board Memo and Staff Report w Attachments.pdf; RULE 245

- SURFACE
COATING OF METAL PARTS AND PRODUCTS.doc; RULE 245

- SURFACE COATING OF METAL PARTS AND PRODUCTS.pdf; Rule 245 SIP Completeness

Che cklist.pdf; Rule 245 Rule Evaluation Form.pdf
Alex,

The Placer County Air Pollution Control District Board of Directors adopted Rule 245, Surface Coating of Metal Parts and Products on August 20, 2009. The District is submitting this rule to the Air Resources Board for your review and for the updating of your rule database. The District requests that the Rule be submitted to U.S. EPA as a requested revision to the SIP. The adoption of the metal products coating rule was a commitment of the Dis trict ’ s RACT

- SIP analysis.

Attached are the electronic files needed for rule review and include: SIP Completeness Checklist, Rule Evaluation Form, Signed Resolution, clean copy of the rule, Proof of Publication for the public hearing at which the rule was adopted, Board Memo/Staff Report and referenced rules. This rule was originally adopted on December 11, 2008. This amendment is to address provisions

of the U.S. EPA ’ s September 2008 CTG which were not incorporated into the original version due to timing issues. Because it was known at the time of adoption that the rule would need to be amended to comply with the new CTG, the rule was not submitted to ARB when it was first adopted on December 11, 2008. This is the first time the rule is being submitted for ARB and EPA consideration and therefore we are not providing a separate strikeout version, although the

amendments are identified in the attachments to the Board Memo.

In addition, Rule 245 references rules 102, 218, 223, 234, 235, 243, 501, 507 and 511. These referenced rules will be sent in a separate email.

The final version (clean copy) has been submitted in both Adobe® Acrobat® and Microsoft

Word® formats.

Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this submittal. Please address any

fo rmal written comments to Thomas J. Christofk, Air Pollution Control Officer 

### tchristo@placer.ca.gov

.
St. Jude Medical, Inc. Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q







EXHIBIT 10.4







AMENDMENT 


TO THE


ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.


2002 STOCK PLAN


WHEREAS, St. Jude Medical, Inc., a Minnesota corporation
 (the “Company”), has heretofore adopted and maintains the “St. Jude Medical, Inc. 2002 Stock Plan” (the “Plan”);


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has retained the power to amend the Plan; and


WHEREAS, the Board has authorized the amendment of the Plan to bring the Plan into compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). 


NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the power of amendment contained in Section 7 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of October 23, 2008, as follows:


1.  Section 1(k) of the Plan is hereby amended by (i) replacing the phrase “one of more,” where it appears therein, with the phrase “one or more,” and (ii) by adding “and in accordance with Section 409A of the Code” at the end thereof.


2.  Section 2(a)(v) of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:


“(v)     to determine, in accordance with Section 409A of the Code, whether, to what extent and under what circumstances Stock and other amounts payable with respect to an award under this Plan shall be deferred either automatically or at the election of the participant; and”



 









3.  Section 4 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the reference to “Parent Corporation or” where it first appears therein.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorized agent on this 23rd day of October, 2008.


 





	
 
 	
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.
 
	
 
 	
 
 	
 
 
	
 
 	
By
 	
/s/ Pamela S. Krop
 


















2
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1761 

To take certain Federal land located in Lassen County, California, into 

trust for the benefit of the Susanville Indian Rancheria, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 14, 2015 

Mrs. BOXER (for herself and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To take certain Federal land located in Lassen County, California, into trust for the benefit of the Susanville Indian 

Rancheria, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LAND INTO TRUST FOR THE SUSANVILLE IN4 DIAN RANCHERIA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The land described in subsection 

6 (b) is taken into trust for the benefit of the Susanville 

7 Indian Rancheria, subject to valid existing rights. 

8 (b) LAND DESCRIPTION.—The land taken into trust 

9 under subsection (a) is the approximately 301 acres of 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1761 IS

1 Federal land under the administrative jurisdiction of the 

2 Bureau of Land Management identified as ‘‘Conveyance 

3 Boundary’’ on the map titled ‘‘Susanville Indian 

4 Rancheria Land Conveyance’’ and dated December 31, 

5 2014. 

6 (c) GAMING.—Class II gaming and class III gaming 

7 under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 

8 et seq.) shall not be allowed at any time on the land taken 

9 into trust under subsection (a). 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1 

### Hall-Jordan, Luke

From: Donaldson, David Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 9:58 AM To: Hall-Jordan, Luke; djones@omb.eop.gov Cc: Arling, Jeremy Subject: RE: Any updates? Attachments: EO12866_CAA Part 82F 2060-AS51 NPRM FRN_20151002.do cx

Hi Danielle, Attached is the final redline version of the rule.

David

202-343-9086

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Jones, Danielle" < Danielle_Y_Jones@omb.eop.gov > Date: October 13, 2015 at 9:32:37 AM EDT To: "Hall-Jordan, Luke" < Hall-Jordan.Luke@epa.gov > Subject: RE: Any updates?
Hello Luke,

We are ready to wrap up the review. Could you pleas e send me the most recent version of the redline for final review?

Thanks, Danielle

From: Hall-Jordan, Luke [ mailto:Hall-Jordan.Luke@epa.gov ] Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 8:54 AM To: Jones, Danielle < Danielle_Y_Jones@omb.eop.gov > Subject: Any updates?

Hi Danielle,

It looks like I may have missed a call from you yes terday evening. I know you’re on leave until next w eek, but please give me a call if you have a second toda y for an update. You can reach me at either of the numbers below or on my personal cell (202-510-0020)

. Thanks again and enjoy your time out of the office!

Best, Luke 202-343-9591 (desk) 202-230-7589 (mobile)2
·-,.~~~P!f60270 ... ------- e 

'1'6P Mlem!fl' • l:J. 6. Jli!EiS 9:NLY 

SUBJECT NUMBER 

·Eo).3(h) (2) 

PB. 86'"3.E)/50 USC 3605 TENTATIVE 

USCIB: 29 .20/20 Item 2 or the Agenda\tor the ll?th Meet:ing ot USCIB, 

held on 12 July 1955. 

Subject: 

The CHAIRMAN (Mr. Dulles) brief'q reviewed the backBJ'O'lUld ot eubject; 

item and suggested. that U.S. action w;Lth re,pact to notifying Gani.an 

authorities of U.S. COMINT units in Germany be reaeJ:"Ved until such time 

as we consider it appropriate. He concluded with an invitation to 

Mr. Annstrong to comment on the diplcmatio aspects ot\this.problem. 

MR. ARMSTRONG said that u.s. :Embassy, Bonn concurs\in the proposed 

notification to the U.K. as set forth in the enclosure with USCIB 

29.20/17. 

GENERAL CANINE suggested that, in addition to the position taken in 

the memorandum. to the U.K., further QC>nsideration be given to the long 

range status of American C<J.1INT units in Germany. I think, he .Qontinued, 

that we should discuss first what we wol.\ld like to do and then measUl'e 

this against what we can do keeping in mind that the use ot Gennan 

geography is required to fulfill our ~INT needs. He concluded With 

the observation that he is not at allunhapP7 with tlle present situat:Lon 0 • 

It was so agreed. 

The members then proceeded to dis.cuss further the specit1c problan 

at hand, including the proposed draft memorandum tor SUKLO. ThJ,.a 

discussion culminated in agreement to approve the proposed memorandum tor 

SUKLO with two minor clarifications, noted in the t'oUowing decision. 

DECISION: (12 July 1955) USCIB approved the memorandum tor SUKLO, 

enclosed with USCIB 29.20/17 or 5 July 1955, with two clarit:Lcationsi 

(1) The addition of paragraph numbers. 

( 2) The insertion of the phrase "Called tor in paragraph 5 of the 

Resolution" after the worc;l "report" in line 5 ot paragraph 2. 

In addition, USCIB charged USCIBEC with the preparation ot recCIJllllendati ans for the development of a long range plan to be used as a guide tor 

.__~~~~~~~~~I . 

USCIB: 29.20/20 ... 4 -

'fOP SECRET 

eclassifi ed and a roved for release b NSA on 11-06-2014 ursuant to E .0. 1352
-:r 24 

USCIB: 5.1/13 

30 Marcil 1955 co~ lBEN'i'IAfi 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Replacement of Incumbent Executive Secretary, USCIB. 

Reference: CIB # 018 of 29 January 1955, 

1. At an Executive Session held at the end of the 112th meeting or 

USCIB on 11 February 1955 it was generally agreed b-3 the majority or the 

menibers that the services of Colonel Harold G. Hayes, U.S. Army should· 

be sought as a·replacement for the incumbent Executive Secretary, USCIB. 

In addition it was agreed that if Colonel Hayes could not-be made 

available, the services of Captain Allyn Cole, Jr., USN should be sought. 

The Board members were asked to consider the reference and indicate to 

the Office of the Executive Secretary prior to the next meeting any other 

candidates. Comments received from the members indicated no new candidates and no change to the above. 

2. CIBD #3 provides as follows with regard to 'the appointment of 

the Executive Secretary, USCIB: 

11The USCIB Executive Secretary shall be appointed by the 

Chairman, USCIB, with the approval of the majority of the 

Board. He shall be either military (active or reactivated 

status) normally of not less than colonel rank (or equivalent) or civilian of approximately equal level, and shall 

be assigned. to the Office of the Secretary of Defense. 

He shall be responsible to the Bdard." 

3. The Army member advises that Colonel Hayes cannot be made available without serious inconvenience. The Chairman has therefore decided 

that Captain Cole should be appointed and has asked the OSD member to 

initiate such action as may be appropriate within the Department of 

Defense to obtain the services of Captain Cole as near 30 May 1955 as is 

feasible. 

USCIB: 5 .1/13 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-10-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

co UFJDf; UT/AL '4+ 11
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 37 (Wednesday, February 25, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 10051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03895]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-76-2014]


Foreign-Trade Zone 45--Portland, Oregon; Revision to Production 
Authority; Epson Portland, Inc., Subzone 45F; (Inkjet Cartridges and 
Bulk Ink); Hillsboro, Oregon

    On October 20, 2014, Epson Portland, Inc. (EPI) submitted a 
notification of proposed revision to existing production authority to 
the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board for EPI's facility in Hillsboro, 
Oregon, within Subzone 45F.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (79 FR 64168-64169, 10-28-2014). The 
FTZ Board has determined that no further review of the proposed 
revision to the scope of production authority is warranted at this 
time. The proposed revision described in the notification is 
authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, 
including Section 400.14.

    Dated: February 19, 2015.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-03895 Filed 2-24-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
/ REF ID:A522459 

'iQP SJ:iBRE!f PRAi'H 0 Jmmary 195'4 

SECURnY OF FJiSHCH OOMMmlOATDS COHCEftllNQ THE 

BEHLD <DFEmiCE or JORBmN MIN ISTEHS 

L. Are there any feasible means b,y uhich these Frenoh 

ocamunications can be made secure (Plan A, Plan B, etc.)? 

2 •. It so, are these plaM within, or beycnd, the terms ot 

reference established by t'1a ns-mc Conf'erenoe on the CCl!S100 ot 

NA ro Countries in Jme 19S3? 

a. Those within -

b. '!hose beyond -

3. What 1«>uld be the etteot o£ applying any ot these pl~ 

now to the long-range program tor the improvement ot French COMSEJl'l 

ii. What changes to the tams ot reference 0£ tha us-mt 

Conterence would be required to implement those plans lmioh · 

exceed the terms or rereronce established b;T the Contorence? 

Se In the light or (a) paragraphs 2.4 above md (b) the r1sk8 

to the suooess ot the Conference and to the security ot the US which 

mtq be eJ!I) acted to arise trcn tb• :lnseO\ll'i t,' of these Frenoh COJ1111Unioations, should any 0£ these plans be recanmsnded to tJSCIR and LS.IR? 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-03-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
:MEMORANDUM FOR OOB 

SUBJECT: USCIB 14/122 

REF 'ID: A522703 

l. I have studied the conclusions in subject paper and have compared them with thoae in 14/100. The following are the principal 

points of differenoe1 ) 

a. USCIB 14/100 lays great emphasis upon French insecurity 

in ~eneral, states that because of their overall insecurity the 

immediate advantaGes which would accrue to the security of the u.s. 

by improvement in aeouri ty of Frenoh diplomatic traffic would be 

likely to be oflimi.ted value, and concludes that steps to illll'l'ove 

French diplc:111atic cryptographic aocuri ty should be taken only after 

there will have been established within the French Government a 

secure &roup to which the U .s. may pass highly classified information 

of ocmbined interest without risk of compromise. 

b. uscrn 14/122, while reoor;nizinr, the existence of' Frenoh 

internal 1nseouri ty, states that its nature and scope have not been 

clearly established, notes the absence of conclusive evidenoe thereof 

(Pa.r. 6 of the Discussion state• that "Thia .,!PPraiaal of French 

per1 "Jnne l insea.uri ty is only partially 1ub1tt\._tiatad by the findings 

of' us and UK intelliGence ar;enoiea~ and oonoiudes that it now 

appears appropriate to oi~naider atepe toward the impr ..,vement of French 

oOlllllUDioati~na 1ecurity with,ut awaiting either the establishment of 

a aeoure group within n::>n-oOlllJllUZlioati ,M areu of the Frenoh Government or the raising of the general level of overall French seouri ty. 

2. In other wordl, user B 14/100 propoHI the. t nothing be done 

until the overall Frenoh security in all £ield1 baa been raised and 

until there ha.a been eata.bllshed within the Frenoh Government a. 

secure owrall group to which clauified information in general could 

be paaaea Wit~out risk to us securityJ USCIB 14/122 proposes that 

if certain oondi tiona can be aasured steps to improve French communi• 

oation security be taken without awaiting overall improvement or the 

establishment of such e.n overall sesure group in the whole field of 

olaa1ified information, and if a program oan be devised to meet these 

oondi tions an approach be made to the French forthwith. One of the 

oondi tions was that the approach to the French "be such as to ensure 

••• the aeourity of the Frenoh authorities involved in each stage of 

the program for improvement of French ocmununioatione security so as to 

asaure minimum loss of oanmunioations intelligenoe to souroes ~ 

than French ••• ". It appears. then, that USCIB 14/122 proposes action 

even 1f' improvement in Frenoh personnel insecurity is ms.de only as 

regards French communications personnel. 

s. I think thie ie dangerous, involves great risks wi thnut caa.-

penaating advantages, and should be very carefully ooMidered by USCIB. 

·~ ... : . ;·"'~ ;, ~ .. ' 

. .· ~- a• ;JLJh~ .. ~._ •. ., WI I.LIAM F. FRIEm:AN ·\~-' • .,. ..:; f..-i('' ,-,-· '"0' nom 

Declassified and approved fo_~ ~-e~),a,s~ ~K~.@ on 06-05-2014 pursuant to E .0. 1352a
#### Baldwin, Appellant, vs. Fogo and others, Respondents.

*September 8*

September *26, 1899.*

*Consolidated Milling Co. v. Fogo, ante,*p. 92, followed.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Richland county: Geo. Clehentson, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*L. H. Bancroft,*for the appellant.

For the respondents there was a brief b *j Prank W. Burn-ham*and *Fruit & Gordon,*and oral argument by *Mr. Burn-ham*and *Mr. J. J. Fruit.*

Oassoday, C. J.

The findings of fact, and the conclusions of law, and the judgment in'this case are substantially the same as in the case of *Consolidated Milling Co. v. Fogo, ante,*p. 92; and for the reasons given in that case the decision of this case is in favor of the defendants.

*By the*Ooivrt.— The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.