alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-19127, 333-19145, 333-80187, 333-42444,333-52236, 333-77006, 333-121074 and 333-141636) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-91211)for Cornell Companies, Inc. of our report dated March 14, 2008relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP

Houston,Texas

March 14, 2008

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<CIK>                          0000888239
<NAME>                         GEODYNE INST/PENS ENERGY INCOME LTD PSHP P-7

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                            353,416
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  749,657
<PP&E>                         14,640,090
<DEPRECIATION>                 12,386,518
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  3,003,229
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   0
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                      3,003,229
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    3,003,229
<SALES>                         1,421,927
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,430,615
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     500,930
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   929,685
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               929,685
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      929,685
<EPS-BASIC>                          4.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0



</TABLE>
# CE2004084EN.01074001.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/740 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/740

---

(2004/C 84 E/0835)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3832/03

by Nicholas Clegg (ELDR) to the Commission

(12 December 2003)

Subject:   Global Drug Facility

Subject:

Is the Commission aware that the Global Drug Facility which has provided 1,9 million patients in 46 countries with free anti-TB drugs in only 26 months, now faces a financial shortfall of USD 27,7 million? What are the present and planned levels of EU support for the GDF? What assurances can the Commission give that the EU is providing sufficient resources to deal with the GDF's present financial shortfall?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(22 January 2004)

(22 January 2004)

The Commission is aware of the role of the Global Tuberculosis (TB) Drug Facility and its constraints.

As regards tuberculosis in developing countries, the Commission developed in 2000 a broad and strategic approach towards confronting human immuno deificiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS), malaria and tuberculosis. The consultations around the High Level Round Table held in September 2000 led to the Programme for Action: Accelerated action on HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis in the context of poverty reduction, which established a coherent Community response for 2001-2006 (1). The Communication's groundbreaking strategy builds on the experience of a comprehensive approach, the principle of country-led development process — ownership — and the interrelationship of health and poverty and its implications for macroeconomic policy and development. It incorporates the crucial global elements of partnerships in development, trade and research. Within this policy framework, the Commission uses a number of instruments in the fight against tuberculosis in developing countries: national and regional indicative programmes through programme, sector or budget support; emergency interventions by the European Humanitarian Aid Office (ECHO); research programmes by the Directorate General for Research and Technological Development (DG RTD); the thematic budget line to fight poverty-related diseases and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) co-financing budget lines. Altogether, the various development, humanitarian and research EC programmed support to combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis, will total close to EUR 1 200 million (annual average of EUR 300 million) for the period 2003-2006. This represents a four-fold increase from the annual average of EUR 73 million in the previous 1994-2001 period.

1

Regarding the request for the Community to increase the support to the Global Drug Facility (GDF), the Commission has to consider many competing demands. The Commission is at present discussing the content of the Strategic Partnership with the World Health Organisation, which includes the priority area of communicable diseases where issues related to the GDF could be considered.

---

(1)  COM(2001) 96 final.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
     The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Winthrop
     Residential Associates I, A Limited Partnership and is qualified in its
     entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         262,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 964,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     641,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   964,000
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               25,000
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .04
        


</TABLE>
... 

T9P SBSRE! 

AFOIN-1A3 

DEPARTMENT OF 'IHE Am L'ORCE 

HEADQUAR'l'F-RS UNITED STATES AIB. FCRCE 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

19 AFR 1955 

MEMCRANDUM FCR THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, USCIB 

SUBJECT: (Csm'WeB:ti:e:l) Emergency and Operational Dissemination of 

Comint 

1. CIBD #15 provides that exceptions to the level of authority 

permitted to determine the existence or an emergency justifying the 

exceptional dissemination of Categories II and III Comint shall be 

specifically authorized by USCIB. 

2. Within the Continental Air Defense Command, the Air Defense 

Division commander is the key to the success of air defense operations. It is at his level that the critical combat decisions are 

made, and therefore, Comint is essential to him. Recognition of this 

fact has resi.1 tted in the clearance of the division commander and 

other key ir~di viduals on his staff for Comint and the establishment 

of an SSO facility at his headquarters. 

3. Based on the same considerations, it is considered that the 

air defense division commander should be given the authority to 

deteI'II.d...'l'le the existence of an emergency justifying the exceptional 

dissemination of a~tegories II and III Gomint. Therefore, it is 

requested that USGIB designate Commanders or Air Defense Divisions as 

exceptions to the lowest level of authority as setforth in Appendix A 

of CIBD #15. 

FOR THE CHIEF Cllf STAFF: 

(Signed) 

MILIARD LEWIS 

Major General, USAF 

Deputy Director of Intelligence 

Enclosure with USOIB 4.2/44 dtd 21 April 1955 

TOP SECRET 

eclassifi d and a roved for re ease b NSA o 03-10-201 ursuant to E. 0. 1352
EXHIBIT 11.1

BAIRNCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED JUNE 30, 2001 AND JULY 1, 2000

(Unaudited)

			 
2001
2000
BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:     
Net income
$  1,023,000
$  2,524,000
Average common shares outstanding
7,317,000
7,595,000
Basic Earnings Per Common Share
$           0.14
$           0.33   
DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:     
Net income
$  1,023,000
$  2,524,000
Average common shares outstanding
7,317,000
7,595,000
Common shares issuable in respect to options issued      to employees with a dilutive effect
73,000
119,000
Total diluted common shares outstanding
7,390,000
7,714,000
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share
$           0.14
$           0.33   
 

EXHIBIT 11.2

BAIRNCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2001 AND JULY 1, 2000

(Unaudited)

			 
2001
2000
BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:     
Net income
$  2,040,000
$  5,030,000
Average common shares outstanding
7,314,000
7,681,000
Basic Earnings Per Common Share
$           0.28
$           0.65   
DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:     
Net income
$  2,040,000
$  5,030,000
Average common shares outstanding
7,314,000
7,681,000
Common shares issuable in respect to options issued      to employees with a dilutive effect
100,000
105,000
Total diluted common shares outstanding
7,414,000
7,786,000
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share
$           0.28
$           0.65
USCIB: 13.3/8 

6 July 1955 

00NPif)l!f'l' lit 

Ml!MORANDlM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Indoctrination for Access to CCMINT. 

USCIB 13.3/6 dated 10 June 1955. 

This notice constitutes Amendment #2 to the reference. It is 

requested that Enclosure 1 thereto be amended accordingly: 

Delete: DETZER, August J. 

Adds KNORR, Klaus E. - Princeton University 

USCIB 

USCIB: 13.3/8 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-04-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

COi\'FfD£&\'TIAL 

24
• 

REF ID:A60451 

TOz- SECLCP./1 · e 

; USCIB: 29.18/15 

23 July 1954 

WOP SES~ Q', S, l!i!B6 0!M E.o 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

llEIDRAlIDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: COMINT Collaboration l'lith I .... ____ ___, 

Reference: USCIB 29.18/14 dated 20 July 1954. 

1. The enclosure is circulated for information in connection 

With the reference. 

2. THIS DOCUMENT AND ITS ENCLOSURE CONTAIN COMMUNICATia~s 

INTELLIGENCE INFOllMATION AND SHALL m HANDLED ONLY IN CHANNELS 

EXPRESSLY PROVIDED FOR COMINT. 

Enclosure 

SUSLO dispatch 222030Z{llf 538) 

July 1954. 

USCIB: 29.18/15 
%Of SBOHffl' - tf .~, E!.18 Offt;Y P R I 0 R I T Y 222030Z 

' FM SOOLO LONDON 'Eo 3. 3 (h) (2) 

TO DIRNSA PL 86-36/50 use 3605 

FOR CHAIRMAN AND I-EMBERS USCIB FROM AR113TRONG 

LW 538 

1 ..... I ____ b6NCLIDED EVENING 2l/JULY WI.TH/APPlWVAL BY BOTH 

DEIEGATIONS OF FINAL PAPERS WHICH BEING PO'IXHED WASHINGTON FORTHWITH IN EXPECTATION CAN BE BEFORE USCIB/AT NEXT MSET!NG. UK HAS IBETING 

scHEDUIED WITH I IIN EARLY SEPT AND woUID VERY MOOH LIKE To BE 

A UTIIORIZED PROCEED ON BASIS OF CONF iAGRESM&NTS BY. THA't TUE. 

2. IN GENERAL US DEIEGATION BELWVES AGREEM!:NT REACHED ON ALL 

SIGNIFICANI' POIN1'$ WITHOur rn HAVING TO RECEDE TO • MINIMUM POSITION 

AUTH BY OOCIB. ~XPECTED DIFFICULTY OVER RAF-0 CONNECTION DID NOT 

MA.TERIALIZE AS RAF WAS PERSUADED TG :riELINQUISH ALL COMINT ASPECTS OF 

ARRANGEM!:NI'S WHEN W ABLE DEM:>NSTRATE IT CAN PROVIDE COMPARABIE 

TECH ASSISTANCE. I IPRoB ALSo/ RESOLVED To om SATISFACTION. 

3. IT HAS BEEN EVIDENT THRO'OOHOUl' CONF THAT SEPARATION OF. COMINl' 

AND ELINT IS IrlmEASIOOLY ARTIFICIAL AND ILLIBCRY AND DCES NOT ACCORD 

WITH DEVELOPING PATTERN OF INI'ELL IN EUROPE. US DEIEGATION\ HAS 

RIGIDLY EXCLTDED ELIN! FROM CONF AGREEIBNI'S BUl' IS CONVINCED THAT 

MAXIMUM DEVELOP:t-ENT oJ!1 lcAPABILITIES WILL HAVE TO TAJCE ACCOUNT OF 

EiiINr ASSISTAfa: AS WELL AS COMINT. 

4. TE DEIEGATION BELIEVES CONF HAS DISSIPATED SEVERAL IMPORTANI' 

MISUNDERSTAND!~ AND PROVIDED BASIS FOR SOUND EXPLOITATION oFI .... ___ 

ParENl'IAL OVER NEAR AND LONGER TERM FOR UK IBA AND WITHOur SERIOIB 

RIS!C TO SECURITY 

Enclosure with ffiCIB 29.18/15 dtd 23 Jul 54. 

'
u. s, sr.sa eNJ.t 

'l'OP S!Cft!'f' PRe'lli 

FK: DIRNSA 

090005Z 

REF ID:A67072 

'l'O: SUSI.() 

4 433. FOR FUIJ.:U .. 'G FROM CJ\NINE PASS TO ACKERMAN. 

09 JULY S4 

DECODE: PJM 

PRIORITY 

!. I HAVE RECEIVED A COPY OF S/6640 AND AM FORWARDit.JG MY VIE.JS ON PARAGFP.APH 

17 FOR !OUR INFORMATION AND GUIDANCE. 

2. I CANNOT AGJ?.EE ~11TH '1.'HE PROFOOED PROCEDURE FOR THI!: DETERMlll:ATION' or TECHNICAL 

D'FOHMATION TO BE SUPPLIED .A.3 3~ FORTH Il-4 '.l'HIS 

PARAGRAPH. I FEEL THAT JOIN'? r\SA-GCHQ DETERMINATION OF ALL TECHNICAL DA1'A 'l'O BE 

PROVIDED TO EACH i'lA'fIOf~ IS AN filIMECESSARlLY INVOLVED PROCEDURE, A?•D COULD RESULT 

IN UNDESIRA'BlJl: DELAY IN THE PROVISION OF SUCH DATA 'l"O THES~ ~ATiOhS. 

3. MY POSITION Ot.i PARA 17 IS A3 F<JLU>WS: 

\ A. NSA. Al'11D GCHQ SHOULD :&'l'l'ABLISH CLEARLY PP..&CRIBEl> LIMITS AS TO THE I~~ ' 

TIPBS OF 'l'tCHNICAL INFO'Di.ATION. TO BE-PROVIDED To EA CH l~A'l'ION. ' 

USA V? GCHQ SHOUID PROVIDE THE TECHNICAL INFORMATION Tc. TH······ .. •1'······· ... NA. ' TIOliS FO..~ ~ICH Tfff; U.S. OR THE U.Y.. RESPECTIVELY, HAS THE ~.t:OOTIATIMG 

'AUTHORITY: .PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

C. N$A A.~C GCHQ, OPiRA.TIMG t/ITHIN THE Plm)CJtIBil:!l LL'1ITS OF EiC.CHANGE, 

SHOULD D21'h'"RMINE It1DEPEr:DltNTLY THK ITDLS OF T3CHNICAL .ItOORMATIO'N 

TO BE SUPPLIED. INFORMrlTIOr.! PRO!lUCEiJ BY BOTH CEKTER.9SHOULD BE 

MADE AVAILABLE BY THE SUPPLYitO CENTER. 

D. A?1Y QUEST !Ot~S AS TO 'l'HE m.smABILITY OF PROVI!lING INFORY.ATION 

li.'OT CLM.'U.Y ~'1I'l'Hit; Tlll; PRESCFUBED LIMITS OF ~CHA.NOE WILL BE 

RESOLVED BEl'~EN ~SA At.D GCHQ THROUGH NORMAL CHAflMELS. 

4. THE A9.1VE PllOCll>URE, wlfICH IS mitIN THE. SPIRIT OF THE UKUSA AGREEMENT 

WOUID PROVIDE ADm:itJATE CONTROL OF THE EX.ClLi\NGE AiID ~IJULD PRESERVE THE NECESSARY 

FREEDOM OF ACTION FOR BOTH Cl!."tll'ERS. 

5. ALTHOUGH AVAILAm.g EV'IDENCE llJ~lCAT.ES .. ·~ DPDREE OF COMIJl."T COLLAOORATION I _I DO.NOT FJ!.EL THAT THE Pl\JVISI<li OF TECHNICAL 

ASSISTANCE SHOULD BE OOMPLICATEO BY THIS FACT. I CANNOT, FOR EXAMPLE, AGREE 'l'O 

THE GCHQ PROCEJlJBE ON THE BASIS THAT ANALOCOUS ll~FORMATION SHOULD BE SUPPLIED I I BECAUSE OF A PRESUMED EXCHANGE OF DATA 

BETWEEN THESE fliA'.l'IONS. I BELIEVE THAT IN TliE LlGH'l' OF PRES.ENT EVID&NCE, WE 1-msT 

DEAL lvI'i'H EACH NATION"lNDEPENtliNTLY. THE ABOVE VI.&fS IN NO WAY OOtlFLICT WITH 

THE U.S. POSITION (.~hICH I REAFFIRM) AS OUTLIKl!ll IN THE U.S. POSITION PAPERS. 

THIS CONCWDES MY CONMENTS ON PARA 17. 

-18,0 8£8/iff 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-27-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
ID:A67072 e 

PAGE 2 OF WL-433 

1Ref S§SRBl' !!mi 

6. MY ONLY COMMl!JiT ON RDfAINDER OF PAPER PERTAINS TO SECTION 3 PARA lO 'lHRU 

12• I CANNOT AGREE TO FLAT PROHIBITION OF TECH ASSISTANCE WHICH WOULD INCREASE 

OOMIHT CAPABILITY. FOB EX.AMPLE RE PARA 12 I FEEL WE SHOULD llEFDITELY PBDVmE 

IE? FAMILIES AND PATTlaS OF KEY EXTRACTION EVEN THOUGH THE! HAVE GIVEN US NO 

EVIDENCE OF DOWLEOOE 'l'HERIO.F. 

7. RICOJ1MEND IOU DISCUSS PAPER WITH PAR'l'ICULAR DIPHASIS ON PARA 17 WI'Dl OTUl 

U.S. DELmAT.ES PRIOR '1'0 CONFERENCE. 

I 

I !OJ 8EBRE~ F R 0 T M 1
# CE2004078EN.01056701.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/567 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/567

---

(2004/C 78 E/0602)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3506/03

by Jorge Hernández Mollar (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(24 November 2003)

Subject:   Community legislation on DNA

Subject:

Experts claim that adoption of legislation on DNA at Community level would help to solve more crimes, thanks to the employment of techniques which allow the identification of individuals, which would in turn render Community collaboration on prosecuting crime more efficient.

The disparate situations obtaining in the relevant legal frameworks of the various Community countries constitutes a hindrance, and prevents more rapid progress being made in the prosecution of criminals and their crimes.

Does the Commission believe that it should use its power of initiative to make a survey of the current state of legal provisions on DNA in order to put forward standard Community legislation which would aid the EU as a whole to solve crimes within its territory more rapidly?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(14 January 2004)

(14 January 2004)

The use, within an appropriate legislative framework, of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) analyses is an effective investigation technique available to the police and judicial authorities in more and more types of crime. It makes it possible to determine with a very high degree of probability the origin of samples of human cells or tissues taken from the crime scene. It can therefore considerably facilitate the process of identifying (either positively or negatively) those associated with the offence concerned.

Any legislative framework authorising the use of DNA testing is more effective if it allows genetic databases to be created so that profiles established at the crime scene can be compared with DNA profiles established in other criminal cases.

The Council has adopted two resolutions on the exchange of DNA analysis results. The first, dated 9 June 1997 (1), invites the Member States to establish national DNA databases in accordance with the same standards and in a compatible manner. The second, dated 25 June 2001 (2), lays down a minimum list of seven markers used for the forensic DNA analyses carried out in the Member States.

1

2

In order to make police and judicial action more effective in solving crime, and subject to legal arrangements yet to be defined, the Commission is considering the possibility of creating national DNA databases in all the Member States and broadening the comparison of a profile established on the basis of a sample taken at the scene of a crime in a Member State with the profiles contained in the other Member States' databases.

---

(1)  Resolution 97C 193/02 of 9 June 1997.

1

(2)  Resolution 2001C 187/01 of 25 June 2001.

2

---
----

|   | /s/ Peter G. Dornau                                            |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Peter G. Dornau                                                |   |
|   | Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |                                                           |   |
|   |                                                           |   |
|   |                                                           |   |
|   | /s/ Jeffrey S. Barocas                                         |   |
|   | Jeffrey S. BarocasChief Financial Officer                      |   |

----
• 

USCIB: 5.2/S2 Il:ANBH!i 'w"IA eEMfN'f etlkNNEfiS eNLY 

2 March 1955 

T6P M'.elt!T - tt.S. Em ONLY 

Ml!MORANDlM FOR THE !'~BERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Tentative Minutes. 

1. Attached is a copy of the tentative minutes for the ll2th Meeting · ot USCIB. Please advise the Secretary if any changes are desired. 

2. In the event there is no objection to these minutes on the part 

ot USCIB members by 9 March 1955 they will be considered approved. 

:Enclosure 

1 copy of Tentative Minutes, 

112th Meeting of USCIB. 

USCIB: S.2/82 

Removed and filed 

USCIB: 5.2/81 

29.3/42 

29.17/19 

7./14 

13.6/25 

13.2/53 

HANBDB ViA 6EJllN'l SH.\NNi1 S ow.I 

TOP SECRET 

eclassifi ed and a roved for release b NSA on 11-20-2014 ursuant to E .0. 1352 
.... . • ~ 

~~7.6 ...... 

COMPmEN'fiAL - l::J. s. EHi6 O:tU.t 

ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH MEETING 

OF THE 

UNITED STATES COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE BOARD 

Lt. General Charles P. Cabell, USAF, Acting Chairman 

PRESENT: 

STATE: 

DEFENSE: 

!!YI= 

AIR FORCE: 

.QM: 

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY: 

SECRETARIAT: 

ALSO PRESENT: 

STATE: 

DEFEXSE: 

HM: 

Mr. W. Park Armstrong, Jr. 

General Graves B. Erskine, USMC (Ret.) 

Mr. S. Drake Ellis 

(for Mr. L. V. Boardman) 

Lt. General Ralph J. Canine, USA 

MaJor General Robert A. Schow 

lfor Major General Arthur G. Trudeau) 

Rear Admiral Carl F. Espe 

MaJor General Millard Lewis 

lfor Major General John A. Samford) 

Mr. Huntington D. Sheldon 

Captain Rufus L. Taylor; USN 

Mr. Hamill D. Jones 

Mrs. Daphne O. Tucker 

Mr. T. Achilles Polyzoides 

Mr. Robert F. Packard 

Mr. Robert G. Walker 

Mr. Philip J. Patton 

Major General John B. Ackerman, USAF 

Captain Jack S. Holtwick, USN 

Mr. William F. Friedman 

Mr. Benson K. Buffham 
• COM'ADftiTAlib e 7 6 • 

ARMY: 

-

~: 

AIR FORCE: 

CC»iMITTEE CHAIR!i:EN : 

Major General Harry Reichelderfer 

Lt. Colonel Richard Leffers 

Commander William F. Bringle 

Lt. Colonel Frank J. Harrold, Jr. 

Captain Allen T. Killer 

I I 

Mr. F'rank S. Rowlett 

Lt. Colonel Henry C. Simmons, USft.F 

(INTCOM) 

Major William R. Culmer,\USA 

(SECCOM) 

The 112th Meeting of the United States Communications Intelligence 

Board was held in the Projection Room, Administration Duilding, Central 

Intelligence Agency, at 1030, Friday, 11 Februa.ry 1955. 

OGA 

- 2 -

CO~'i;:!'D£' 'tY:t "• TIAL 
SUBJECT NUMBER 

USCIB: 5.2/81 

Subject: 

REF ID:A678":/6 

Item 1 of the Agenda for the 112th Meeting of USCIB, 

held on 11 February 195~. 

Approval of the Final Minutes of the lllth Meeting. 

THE ACTING CHAIRMAN (General Cabell) asked if there were any comments 

on subject minutes. 

There were no comments. 

DECISION: (11 February 1955) USCIB approved the final minutes of the 

lllth meeting without change. 

USCIB: ,5.2/81 - 3 -