Environmental

Protection Agency

Division of Air Pollution Control
Table of Contents

Highlights from 2009

Objectives for 2009, and the Status of

Compliance with Each

Summary of the Environmental Improvements

Overall Program Statistics

Field Office Statistics

Penalty Statistics
Highlights from the Ohio EPA's 2009

Air Enforcement Activities

91.9% compliance rate at the end of the year for 1,562 High Priority Facilities

95 cases resolved

54 cases resolved with Findings and Orders (only 52 F&Os were issued)

22 referrals to the Attorney General's Office

57 cases resolved by the Attorney General's Office (3 Court Orders

resolved 47cases, 45 of which were involved in the Shelly Materials, Inc.

trial, and 8 Consent Orders resolved 9 cases)

100 new cases

85 cases pending at the end of the year within the DAPC Enforcement

Committee

62 cases pending at the end of the year at the Attorney General's Office

$ 4,762,285 in civil penalties:

$ 1,279,080 Ohio EPA

$ 2,295,387 Ohio EPA/AGO

$ 60,300 local air agencies

$1,127,518 USEPA

The total air civil penalties assessed in Ohio since 1984 equal $115,823,849.
The following total emission reductions resulted (or will result) from the

enforcement cases resolved through F&Os and Consent Orders:

CO - 2 TPY; particulates - 104 TPY; VOC/OC - 35 TPY; NOx - 157 TPY; and

802 - 1,873 TPY.

The following major enforcement cases were resolved by the Ohio EPA or the

Ohio EPA/AGO with large civil penalties, i.e., equal to or greater than $100,000:

Plasti-Kote Company, Inc.

The Belden Brick Company, L.L.C.

The Shelly Holding Company, et al. (Court decision

is under appeal by OEPA)

CertainTeed Corporation

Circle K Midwest

Aleris International, Inc., Commonwealth

Aluminum Concast, Inc. (Ohio), IMCO

Recycling of Ohio, Inc., et al.

(joint case with USEPA)

Emery Oleochemicals, LLC

$ 240,000

$1,000,000

$ 350,123

$ 230,000

$ 100,000

$ 334,545*

(*Ohio portion)

$ 143,500
DAPe Enforcement Objectives

for CY 2009, and the Status of

Compliance with Each

1. Achieve an overall compliance percentage for High Priority Facilities

(HPFs) of 93.0% or greater. (This would include any HPF with emission

and/or significant administrative violations.)

At the end of CY 2008, the compliance percentage for HPFs was only

86.7%. By the end of CY 2009, the compliance percentage had increased

to 91.9%

2. Resolve 80 or more EC cases during CY 2009, and of the 80, use F&O's

to resolve 40 or more of the cases.

95 cases were resolved during the CY, and 54 of those cases were resolved

with F&O's.

3. By 12/31, resolve all 37 oUhe "old cases" on the EC docket. (Where an

"old case" is defined as any case on the docket at the end of the CY

that would have an EAR date prior to July 1, 2008.)

At the end of 2009, there were 10 unresolved "old cases" on the EC docket.

4. Develop each new case received during the calendar year in a timely

manner. ("Develop" :: prepare a OWL, draft F&O's, or a referral to the

AGO.)

This was an ongoing effort of the DAPC.

5. Give priority to resolving all of the cases involving High Priority

Violators.

Top priority was given to all the High Priority Violator cases in order to

resolve them as quickly as possible.

6. Continue to calculate the environmental improvementfor each resolved

case.

This was calculated for each of the cases resolved during the CY where

there was an environmental improvement.
SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL iMPROVEMENTS RESULTiNG

FROM OHIO EPA AIR ENFORCEMENT SETTLEMENTS DURING 2009

FACILITY

SETTLEMENT TYPE OF POLLUTANT

DATE SETTLEMENT POLLUTANT REDUCTIONS REMEDY

T.S. Trim Industries, 06/17/09 F&Os NOx 1 TPY Emissions reductions

Inc. CO 2 TPY were achieved through

VOC <1 TPY the replacement of a

PM <1 TPY natural gas-fired thermal

oxidizer with a new nonincineration, switch bed

adsorber.

Chemtrade Logistics 04/02/09 Consent SO, 1,171 TPY Reduction of 883 TPY of

(US), Inc.lChemtrade Decree SO, emissions resulted

Refinery Services, from installing a new

Inc.lMarsulex, Inc. scrubber at the Cairo

(Cairo and Oregon facility.

facilities)

Improvement of

chemical processes will

result in the reduction of

288 TPY of SO,

emissions at the Oregon

facility.

The Belden Brick 07/06/09 Consent SO, 702 TPY SO, emissions

Company, LLC Order reductions resulted from

installing a slurry

scrubber to control

emissions from the Plant

8 kilns (-202 TPY) and

a dry scrubber to control

emissions from the Plant

3 kiln (-500 TPY).

CertainTeed 10/19/09 Consent PE 29 TPY Operational problems

Corporation Order with the baghouse

serving emissions unit

P011 (Line #2 filler

heater) were corrected.

Emery Oleochemicals, 12/17109 F&Os PE 18 TPY PE reductions occurred

LLC OC 8 TPY as a result of a fuel

switch from coal to #4

fuei oil for emissions unit

B028, adjustment of

boiler oil burners, and

repairs to the baghouse

control.

OC emission reductions

resulted from the

replacement of the

catalytic oxidizers

serving emissions units

P010 and P017

(ozonolysis processes)

with regenerative

thermal oxidizers.

Page 1
SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL iMPROVEMENTS RESULTING

FROM OHIO EPA AIR ENFORCEMENT SETTLEMENTS DURING 2009

FACILITY

SETTLEMENT TYPE OF POLLUTANT

DATE SETTLEMENT POLLUTANT REDUCTIONS REMEDY

D&R Supply, Inc. 12/02/09 F&Os PM 56TPY An existing wet scrubber

controlling emissions

from emissions unit

P901 (asphaltic

concrete plant with

rotary drum dryer) was

replaced with a

baghouse.

Evonik Degussa 12/17/09 F&Os NOx 67 TPY Improvements were

Engineered Carbons VOC 3 TPY made to operation of the

Corporation common flare. serving

emissions units P001

and P002 (carbon black

production units).

E.l. Ceramics, LLC 12/21/09 F&Os OC 23 TPY An interlocking system

was installed for

emissions units P002

(blending, processing,

glazing, and curing

process with fabric filter

and thermal oxidizer),

P005 (curing oven #2

with thermal oxidizer),

and all other units

controlled with thermal

oxidizers. The

interlocking system

shuts down the

emissions units if the

temperature of the

associated thermal

oxidizer falls below a set

level.

Republic Engineered 12130/09 F&Os NOx 89 TPY Repairs were made to

Products, Inc. emissions unit P081, a

421.6 million Btu/hour

bloom reheat furnace

with a. low NOx burner.

SUMMARY TABLE

POLLUTANT

Particulates

VOC/OC

CO

NOx

SO,

TOTAL

TOTAL REDUCTIONS

104 TPY

35 TPY

2TPY

157 TPY

1,873 TPY

2,171 TPY

Page 2
Overall Program Statistics




en

w

u

u.

o

IX:

w

!Xl

:2E

::::l

Z

NUMBER OF CASES REFERRED TO THE AGO

DURING 2000 THRU 2009

50

2000

2001

2002 2004

2003 2005

CALENDAR YEAR

2006

2007

2008

2009
en

w

()

u.

o

0:::

W

III

::iE

::J

Z

AIR ENFORCEMENT CASES RESOLVED BY

THE OEPA/AGO DURING 2000 THRU 2009

57

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

CALENDAR YEAR
Field Office Statistics

(The following graph does not include the partial-role local air agencies, i.e., the Lake

County General Health District and Mahoning-Trumbull Air Pollution Control Agency.

During 2007, 2008, and 2009, the Lake County General Health District was involved in

the resolution of 3, 2, and 0 enforcement cases, respectively.

During 2007,2008, and 2009, the Mahoning-Trumbull Air Pollution Control Agency was

involved in the resolution of 4,6, and 1 enforcement cases, respectively.)
SUMMARY OF TOTAL CASES RESOLVED BY

FIELD OFFICE FOR 2007, 2008, AND 2009

20 -,----------------------------------,

TDES

PORTS

CAN CDO

18 -I------~-- ----------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------.----------------.----------------- ----------------1

(J) 16 + -----1 +----------------------+f---------------------- ------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------. ----- ------------------------1

W

14 -i------Jf--------------------

(,) 12 ~---

u..

o 10 - \ ------------ ...

0::" " •.. 8 ----------- -----~- ---------

~: -_:::--::: __::_- ::::: ... -------:::::_~ >" ;:~ 2 . :~; ._._.:s .;, -'-.. ._----0:

o :;,::

AKRON NEDO CLEVE NWDO SWDO

HAMCO SEDO RAPCA

FIELD OFFICE

2007 11III 2008 2009
HPV_ComplianceStatus_USEPA

Compliance & Enforcement Tracking Application Unresolvesl }trv C~ Unresolved Non-HrV Cases

J:'age 1 or L

-

11a£l< to.Query.RepQrt

Compliance status of Ohio's Title V and Synthetic Minor Facilities

Overall Overall

Total Ntlmber of Total Number of Total Number of Compliance Compliance

TWe V Facilities Total Number of Overall Overall Synthetic Minor Synthetic Minor Percentage Percentage

with Unresolved Title V Facilities Compliance Compliance Total Number of Facilities with Facilities with foc for

OOfLAA Total Number of Formal with Unresolved Percentage for Percentage for Synthetic Minor Unresolved Unresolved Synthe.tic Synthetic

Tllle V FacilHies Violations (HPV Formal Title V Facilities Tille V Fadlities Facilities Formal Formal Minor Minor

and Non-HPV Violations (HPV {HPV and Non- (HPV Cases Vlolations (HPV Violations (HPV Facilities Facilities

Cases) Cases Only) HPV Cases) Only) and Non-HPV Cases Only) (HPVand (HPV

Gases) Non-HPV Cases

Cases) Only)

01 CDO 55 8 6 85.5 89.1 107 6 2 94.4 98.1

02 NEOO 110 18 16 83.6 85.5 106 6 5 94.3 95.3

03 NWOO 133 28 20 78.9 85.0 144 9 5 93.8 96.5

04 TOES 27 3 2 88.9 92.6 21 4 1 81.0 95.2

05 SWDQ 15 0 0 100.0 100.0 30 0 0 100.0 100.0

06 SEDO 85 7 7 91.8 91.8 126 4 3 96.8 97.6

07 Ports, CHO 15 0 0 100.0 100.0 10 0 0 100.0 100.0

08 RAPCA 38 2 1 94.7 97.4 81 3 1 96.3 98.8

13 Cleve.DAQ 51 8 4 84.3 92.2 69 2 0 97.1 100.0

14 HAMCO DES 61 4 4 93.4 93A 126 9 1 92.9 99.2

15 Canton APC 24 1 1 95.8 9S.8 27 0 0 100.0 100.0

16 Akron RAQMD 29 4 3 86.2 89.7 72 1 1 98.6 98.6

Totals 643 33 64 87. t ~-"'O 90_0% 919 44 19 95.2% 97.9?/o

t!.Q.t§.;

Ovei'alJ Compliance Percentage = (Total Number of Facilities - Total Number of Facilities with Unreso.lved Forma! Violations {fatal Number of Facilities) :;: 100%

Do not include the shutdown facilities.

,. .,. .......... ..-. . 1 nonm ()
Penalty Statist: ics
CASH CIVIL PENALTIES ASSESSED BY THE

OHIO EPA DURING 2000 THRU 2009

1.8

en

z

o

:J

..J

::iE

z

en

w

i=

<i!

z

W

Q.

..J

:>

()

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 . 2005 2006

CAL..EN[)A~YEAR

2008 2009
,,-'-(J) zo

:J

...J

:::iE z=

(J) w

i=

<i! zw

a.

...J

:>u

2.25
.-.

rn

z

o

::::i

...J

::iE

z

'='

rn

w

i=

:a!

z

W

0.

...J

:>

u

. ...... ; . .

CASH CIVILPENALTIES·ASSESSED BY THE

OHIO EPA/AGO DURING 2000 THRU 2009 .;

2.56
· '. '.

TOTAL CIVil PENALTIES ASSESSED BY THE

OHIO EPA/AGO DURING 2000 THRU2009

C/)

z

0 2.82 :::i

...I

:a:

z

C/)

UJ

i=

<i!

z

UJ

a.

...I

:>

C3

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

CALENDAR YEAR

2007 2008 2009
en

z

o

..J

..J

:z

z

:::;:..

en

w

i=

<l.

z

w

C.

..J

:>

()

, , ' ,

CASH CIVIL PENALTIES ASSESSED IN OHIO

DURINq 2000 THRU 2009
en

z

o

:::i

..J

:iE

z

en

w

i=

<i!

z

w

a.

..J

:>

u

" .. :. - .-. """; :'.

TOTAL CIVIL PENALTIES ASSESSED IN OHIO

DURING 2000 THRU 2009

2004 2b05

CALENDAR YEAR
2007

2004 2000

m'l __ m~: ~" I 2001

RUNNING TOTALS OF CIVil PENALTIES

_', .. ,' .... ".'<'_..::(, ..... _..•<:<'-:, -.-:_:', c. -:','.:: -'>,<",.<- -". '-. :'0-' ',:':« :..::: -:,' ', ..... ':_ '," .. :: -.: _

ASSESSED IN OHIO DURING 2000 THRU 2009

-------~- --- --- ---- . --

_ __________----- : ::::_:::--: __::.. _:-:-:: :-:_1:~7_1a __:_~~~:1:_

2000

130

120C=1

110 +-----------------

===~~~ 100-_

1

~: ....•••••••... ·....~80~9i14_ ..3 .

o ......W... ".44 ,..,..'•.,--.... 911.63

1: T------,-----------..--------.-------------------.---- ---. ---------- --- --- ------------- ---- ------------------- ---------------------i
Lead Sources and Lead Monitors Locations 

Legend: Monitors – Sources - 
TRI (tpy) State E

Sources (> 0.5 tpy) 05 06 07 08 09 05 0

Ellwood Engineered Castings (1) 1.735 2.013 1.825 1.825 2.060 1.America Spring Wire Corp (1) 1.187 1.198 0.607 0.594 0.588 NTV NNucor Steel Marion, Inc. (1) 0.730 0.Timken Co. (2) 1.045 0.984 0.805 NR NR 0.320 0.I. Schumann Co. (3) 0.550 0.550 0.450 0.450 0.400 NTV NGeneral James M. Gavin Power Plant (3) 0.580 0.Severstal Warren (3) 2.400 2.

MONITORS

Middletown 39‐017‐0015Columbiana Port 39‐029‐0019Michigan Ave. 39‐029‐0020Maryland 39‐029‐0022St. Tikhon 39‐035‐0038Fire Sta. 4 39‐035‐0042MM South 39‐035‐0061Woodrow 39‐049‐0025Marietta 39‐167‐0008Marietta 39‐167‐0010Ferro 39‐035‐0049 (source w/monitor)Bunting Bearing 39‐051‐0001 (source w/monitor)Am Spring Wire 39‐035‐0072 (2010 source w/monitor)Nucor Steel 39‐101‐0003 (2010 source w/monitor)Timken 39‐151‐0017 (2010 source w/monitor)Ellwood 39‐155‐0012 (2010 source w/monitor)G.T. Craig 39‐035‐0060 (2011NCore)Taft 39‐061‐0040 (2011 NCore)Moraine FH 39‐113‐7001 (2011 NCore)(1) already monitored (see monitor section)(2) Permanent Shutdown 2/28/09 (see monitor section)(3) No monitor required per modeling ‐ requested waiverNTV=non‐Title V and therefore not subject to State Emissions ReportingNR=not reported
Ohio EPA Division of Air Pollution Control 

Funding Sources Fiscal Years 2012 – 2014 

Division Fee Description 

Fiscal 

Year Last 

Changed 

ORC 

Section 

Estimated 

Annual 

Revenue 

Current Fee Amount/Range & Structure Payer 

Various Environmental Protection Fee 2006 3734 $22,000,000 $1.50 per ton of solid waste divided among all programs and accounted for separately. Landfills 

DAPC Title 5 Emission Fees 2003 3745.11 $14,600,000 CY 2010 emission fee is $44.48/ton. A CPI adjustment occurs each year. Utilities and large manufactureDAPC 

Automobile Emission Testing Program Funding 

Varies N/A $13,030,000 As specified by the General Assembly to provide monies for the contractor to operate the program. In FY2008- 2009, general revenue fund monies were provided. General Revenue Fu

DAPC Asbestos Removal Fee 1993 3704.03 and 3745.11 $300,000 Fees are charged for the notification ($75) and cubic yards ($4) and square feet ($3) of asbestos removed. Facilities containing asbestos DAPC 

Non Title 5 Biennial PTO Fees 

2003 3745.11 $750,000 

Fees are charged every two years based on annual emissions in tons. Fee nearly doubled in 2003 for sources emitting less than 50 tons per year, but a number of those sources were exempt due to ORC change. While the fee per ton charge increased, total revenue collected decreased due to the exemptions. Fee is graduated and based on tons emitted in the prior calendar year, and ranges from $100-$700/year. 

Small manufacture

DAPC Permit to Install 2003 3745.11 $790,000 

Fee charged for construction of new air polluting sources. Fees nearly doubled in 2004 but many sources were exempted and total revenue collected decreased. This fee category contains many individual fees of various amounts. 

Facilities whinstalled regulated emissions sources 

DAPC 

Federally Enforceable State Operating Permits (FESOPs) also referred to as synthetic minor facilities. 

2002 3745.11 $320,000 

SFY 2001 was the first year these applications were billed, fee has not changed since inception. Fee is graduated and based on tons emitted in the prior calendar year, and ranges from $170-$3,350/ton. 

Med-sized manufacturenot covered Title V or NoTitle V 

DAPC Federal Grant Changes annually N/A $6,200,000 Federal Grants including Section 105 and PM2.5 (103 Grant). U.S. EPA DAPC 

112r: Risk Management Plant (RMP) program, also referred to as the accidental release program 

2000 3753.05 $125,000 

Qualifying facilities must pay an annual fee based on the amount of toxic substances they have. $50 registration fee with the following: $65 for propane if it is the only regulated substance on site; $65 anhydrous ammonia sold for agricultural use; $200 for all other substances. 

Facilities witoxic substances onsite 
OhioEP.JL

DifJilJitm qfAirPollution Control

InteroMce communication

to:

from:

subject:

date:

DAPC M~~ers; EER Contacts

Todd Browr{ CEMS/COMS Coordinator

1st Quarter, 2011, EER Summary Report

July, 2011

Attached is the first quarter, 2011 excess emissions reports ("EER") summary report.

Data used to compile this report were taken from all EERs received as of the morning of

July 7, 2011. Second quarter 2011 EERs will be expected no later than August 15,

2011, and reports received after this date may show as late/not received in the next

quarterly EER summary report.

Work on the EER data entry program continues. Unfortunately the program is not ready

for universal distribution and use. For second quarter 2011 data entry, the program will

be sent out to both a district and a local office for use and feedback. Hopefully we can

get the kinks worked out and have it out to everybody for third quarter EER data entry.

This quarter it has been noted that there were many EER summaries submitted that

classified CEMS "Downtime" in the "Excess Emissions" portion on the data summary

sheet, and then put a note in the comments section as to why the downtime was being

classified in a given category. Please do not include downtime in the excess emissions

portion of the EER data sheet. There are only two downtimes that need to be reported

on the' EER data summary sheet: all CEMS downtime that occurred during source

operation including QA/QC; and, all CEMS downtime that occurred during source

operation not including QA/QC. If a further breakdown of CEMS downtime is required,

you will be contacted for more details.

Also with regard to CEMS downtime, there are still quite a few EERs being submitted

that are either not reporting CEMS downtime including QA/QC, or that are reporting the

same amount of CEMS downtime with QA/QC as without QA/QC. Although QA/QC

checks may be completed in enough time that a "valid hour" of data is collected by the

CEMS, QA/QC events do need to be quantified and included in the EER summary

reports. Please see the fourth quarter of 2010 EER summary report for more details if

necessary.

Please review the data included in this summary for facilities within your jurisdiction.

Corrections or adjustments should be sent to my attention. If you have questions

regarding this report, or suggestions that would make the report more useful or easier to

read, please call me at (614) 644-4839, or email me at

«todd.brown@epa.state.oh.us».
Ohio EPA Division of Air Pollution Control

Executive Summary as of Quarter 1, 2011

REPORTING _-0 _.. _.~~ __,_.__ .~ •.•____INFORMATION __.___________

Unique Late or Not

Agencies Facilities Sources Monitors Combinations On Time Received Percent On Time

COO 13 22 42 44 44 0 100.00

NEDO 22 20 63 68 3 65 4.41

NWDO 33 41 89 117 117 a 100.00

TOLEDO 18 56 60 113 113 0 100.00

SEDO 20 40 101 157 157 0 100.00

PORTS 5 11 40 40 38 2 95.00

RAPCA 8 16 45 55 55 0 100.00

CLEVELAND 8 15 12 19 19 a 100.00

HCDES 19 35 98 106 106 a 100.00

CANTON 5 20 23 35 35 0 100.00

AKRON 4 8 9 13 9 4 69.23

SWDO 1 2 1 2 a 2 0.00

TOTAL 156 286 583 769 696 73 90.51%

AVERAGE DO AVERAGELAA

82.73% 98.43%

AVERAGE DO & LAA

90.51%

PERCENT OF MONITORED EMISSIONS UNITS EXPERIENCING NON-EXEMPT EXCESS EMISSIONS

COUNT PERCENT

5 1.0 TO 1.9 PERCENT NON-EXEMPT EXCESS EMISSIONS »»»> 0.86

1 2.0 TO 2.9 PERCENT NON-EXEMPT EXCESS EMISSIONS »»»> 0.17

2 3.0 TO 3.9 PERCENT NON-EXEMPT EXCESS EMISSIONS »»»> 0.34

2 4.0 TO 4.9 PERCENT NON-EXEMPT EXCESS EMISSIONS »»»> 0.34

20 5.0 PERCENT AND GREATER NON-EXEMPT EXCESS EMISSIONS> 3.43

1.0 TO 1.9 PERCENT MONITOR DOWNTIME »»»»»»»»>

2.0 TO 2.9 PERCENT MONITOR DOWNTIME »»»»»»»»>

3.0 TO 3.9 PERCENT MONITOR DOWNTIME »»»»»»»»>

4.0 TO 4.9 PERCENT MONITOR DOWNTIME »»»»»»»»>

5.0 PERCENT AND GREATER MONITOR DOWNTIME »»»»»

PERCENT OF MONITORED EMISSIONS UNITS EXPERIENCING MONITOR DOWNTIME

COUNT

70

5

13

6

23

PERCENT

12.01

0.86

2.23

1.03

3.95

SUM MARY. FRX_ M 0 NITOR. DBF; PREVPN.PRG PRINTED: 7/7/2011 11:34 AM
EM owntim

Thursday, July 07,2011

0302020012 LIMA REFINING COMPANY POlO 5162 129600 9305 7.18%

0575010160 CARGILL INC., SIDNEY BOOl S295 128478 12087 9.41%

0616000000 CONESVILLE - AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER B003 5217 88824 14760 16.62%

0641090234 MINGO JUNCTION ENERGY BOOl N205 600 180 30.00%

0641090234 MINGO JUNCTION ENERGY B002 N206 660 180 27.27%

0641160017 W H SAMMIS - OHIO EDISON COMPANY B007 P050 129600 129600 100.00%

0641160017 W H SAMMIS - OHIO EDISON COMPANY B009 P052 126120 126120 100.00%

0641160017 W H SAMMIS - OHIO EDISON COMPANY BOll P054 106140 106140 100.00%

0679000251 BELDEN BRICK CO P801 S290 128580 60660 47.18%

0679000251 BELDEN BRICK CO P803 5290 128580 60660 47.18%

0701000060 KILLEN - DAYTON POWER & LIGHT BOOl POOO 111360 10913 9.80%

1431350817 E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY POOl

Tota~ More than 5% Time CEMS Downtime: 23

5155 91020 91020 100.00%

Page 1 of 1
5 S5 E .. ..

ISSI s Thursday, July 07, 2011

0124000132 ASA BLOOMINGBURG BOOl N463 26100 129600 20.14%

0641090010 SEVERSTAL (WHEELING PITTSBURGH STEEL) BI03 H040 12240 129600 9.44%

0641090010 SEVERSTAL (WHEELING PITTSBURGH STEEL) BI05 H040 12240 129600 9.44%

0641090010 SEVERSTAL (WHEELING PITTSBURGH STEEL) BI07 H040 12240 129600 9.44%

0641090010 SEVERSTAL (WHEELING PITTSBURGH STEEL) P006 H040 12240 129600 9.44%

0641090010 SEVERSTAL (WHEELING PITTSBURGH STEEL) P008 H040 12240 129600 9.44%

0671010028 GLATFELTER B014 COlO 4320 18343 22.73%

0701000007 STUART - DAYTON POWER & LIGHT B002 P281 1012 2289 44.21%

0819750245 ANDERSONS ETHANOL 8002 N445 24660 119700 19.88%

1576002006 MARATHON ASHLAND PETROLEUM - CANTO P016 S125 4620 91500 5.03%

More than 5% Excess Emissions: 19

Page 1 of 1
STATEWIDE SUMMARY OF MONITORED SOURCES IN RELATION

TO NONEXEMPT EXCESS EMISSIONS

4.00

....~~......................

,v ·•·..· ·.·.·.· · v ·..~,·.~ w · ·..· ·.·.·.·.·..· · ·.·•.· ·..·<w.·.v.· , w =v.~wn:'3'tt'..= v..v wv v.w " v" w" w.v<·" C,.:.3'4~w ......•" m.w.w.w"w ~·••·.· ~.· w w.

0.17

0.00 -'~......... .........--

0.50 \ w · ...

2 • 0 0 ....•L "' "' ·.·.·.· ·.· ·..· ·,w · wv.·.'w w·,w · • ·.· ·.·.·.·.·•.·•.· ·••· ·,w m,w.' "<v · '.·.·•.·•.·•.·•.·•.· w · w · ·•· ·.•· ,w • "'••w.·.· ·.· ·•.·.,w..v.· ·.·•.·.·.·.· ·.•·.·•.w ·.·.·.w.· ·,w v w······· l

s

o

U 1.50

R

C

E 1.00

S

M

o 3.50 ...;- m _ m • ·.·.·w··, · • •·.•••·w~_."'" •.· ·_~·.· _ , ·~,~ • ~~.· ··,,· •.._ _~ m~ ._ , , , , _ , , - = _ ,..~ , = ; _ , , .

N

I

T 3.00 w·t~<w<'~wm.'.~~'~w..m"""..'_ , w.w ~_,..,...•.·.·.w.·•.·.·.·.·.·•.·.w.·••·.·.'w.·.·.w.·.·.·.·.~·.~,·<,=,~ ~,w ,w< w<,~~w.·.,· <..<~,·=·•.·.·<~ ~w.~ ·<.·=~w•.w.w.· ·,w w w.~~..,= .w..~w.•·=w<w.w._.· ·.·•·.•·.w <..w..,·<,~·.w.'w.·.~~~w.".·.,,'w.·.~·.·..· w..·.,·.w.,·.w.w.·•.•w•.·•··.."v.w..w..w.·.w.~w"••· ~· w.•~w.

o

R

2.50

E

D

%

-

1.0 TO 1.9 2.0 TO 2.9 3.0 TO 3.9 4.0 TO 4.9

RANGE OF EXCESS EMISSIONS (%)

5.0+

CENS Executive Summary Chart I PRINTD: 7/7/201112:07 PM
STATEWIDE SUMMARY OF MONITORED SOURCES IN RELATION

TO MONITOR DOWNTIME

1.03

2.23

3.95

_____ • _~~~~~~~".~~~~~_~ ~~ nYo',. ,,_~

0.86

12.01

8.00 .+--~".~~

2. 00·~r-=~·,,~

0.00+---

s

o 6.00 4"·~y---,,~-~~

U

R

C 4.00 ,0-~---~~

E

S

14.00 <_,....._~~_~_."c~~~"~y__•.~~~__'<~_.~_,>Y"Y<.

M

o 12.00

N

I

T 10.00

o

R

E

D

%

-

1.0 TO 1.9 2.0 TO 2.9 3.0 TO 3.9 4.0 TO 4.9

RANGES OF MONITOR DOWNTIME (%)

5.0+

CEMS Executive Summary Chart II PRINTED: 7/7/201112:07 PM
ING REPORT aiDEA.\ Year: 2011 Qrt: 1 Total Missing: 6 Thursday, July 07,2011

Prerrlise Source Mntrid Facility Agency Name Emissions unit Yeat

Akron Regional Air Quality Manage Missing: 4

1667040085 B007 P567 KENT STATE UNIVERSITY Akron Regional Air Quality 121mmBtu gas blr 1 2011

Management District

1667040085 B007 N286 KENT STATE UNIVERSITY Akron Regional Air Quality (lb/mmBtu) 121mmBtu gas blr 1 2011

Management District

1667040085 B006 P566 KENT STATE UNIVERSITY Akron Regional Air Quality 121mmBtu gas blr 1 2011

Management District

1667040085 B006 N287 KENT STATE UNIVERSITY Akron Regional Air Quality (lbjmmBtu) 121mmBtu gas blr 1 2011

Management District

Portsmouth Local air Agency Missing: 2

0701000060 BOOl S135 KILLEN - DAYTON POWER & LIGHT Portsmouth Local air Agency

0701000060 BOOl D001 KILLEN - DAYTON POWER & LIGHT Portsmouth Local air Agency

Total Missing: 6

(lb/mmBtu) Coal Boiler w/ESP

(particulate Ib/mmBtu) Coal

Boiler w/ESP

1 2011

1 2011

Page 1 of 1
Fit\S1t Quarter" 2011

EER Action Recommendations

The follo\ving recolllillendations are nlade based expressly on excess elnissions report ('lEER") data froln the third qua11er of 2010 through the first qual1er of 201 L based on all

EERs received as of the 1110rning of July 7. 2011. Source operation tillle, CEMS/COMS downtime, excess elllissions, and the ability of a facility to correct problellls frorn quarter

to quarter were taken into account when 11laking these recolnillendations. Action recommendations are only Inade for sources that were in operation at least 5~/0 of the avai i8b Ie

tillle in the specified quarter. These are only recolllinendations; it is up to the district or local office to take appropriate action for any CEMS/COMS downtillle or recorded excess

eillissions at assigned facilities. Recolnlnendations do not take into account any actions that may already have been taken. The level of actions taken for CEMS/COMS dOvvntin1e

and recorded exceedences should be adjusted to take into account facility inforlnation that was not used in developing this list, such as Director's approved ll1aintenance requests

and Inonitor certification periods. Please be aware that this data may be the basis offuture enforcement actions, so problelns should be addressed accordingly.

Warning Letter

Prernise Facility Nanle Eluissions Unit Paralueter 1st Quarter 2011 4th Qualier 2010 3rd Quarter 2010

ID

B009 H2S (gr/dscf) lO.16%DT

8016 H2S (gr/dscf) 10.16 %DT

8026 H2S (gr/dscf) 10.16 % DT

B027 H2S (gr/dscf) 10.16 % DT

8028 H2S (gr/dscf) 10.16 % DT I

Opacity 6.26 % EE 1

0302020012 Lilna Refining COlnpany I

POlO CO (pplll @ 0 % 02) 7.00 % EE I

S02 (lb @ K lb feed) 7.18 % DT 29.26 % DT I

I

S02 (lblk Ib S prod) 17.00 % EE

P040

S02 (ppm @ 0% 02) 6.12 % EE

S02 (lb/k lb S prod) 17.00 %EE I

I

P04l

I S02 (ppm @ 0% 02) 6.12 % EE

I

0448020007 BP Oil Company - Toledo Refinery P037 S02 (ppill @ 0% 02) 20.l7%DT I

i

BOOI S02 (lbhnlnBtu) 9.41 % DT :

0575010160 Cargill Inc., Sidney

B002 S02 (lb/ll1lnBtu) 9.41 % DT !

Page 1 of 4
II

Warning Letter Ii

q

Pren1ise Facility Nan1e Elnissions Unit Paralneter 1st Qualier 2011 4th Qualier 2010 3

rd Quarter 20 IU II

ID

B001 Opacity 10.26 % DT I

0701000007 Stuart Station - DPL I

8004 Opacity 7.00 % DT !

Opacity 9.80 % DT

!I 0701000060 K.illen Station - DPL B001 Particulate 12.06 ~/o DT I

I

S02 (lbhnlnBtu) 5.24 % EE I

I

!

1431350064 AgriulTI North Bend Nitrogen Operations POOl NOx (lb/ton acid prod) 21.35 % DT

1576000301 Marathon Ashland POll S02 (ppm @ 0% 02) 5.03 % EE 5.43 % DT

POll S02 (lb/hr) 5.43 % DT I

I

P016 S02 (ppm @0% 02) 5.03 % EE 5.43 %DT I

P016 S02 (lb/hr) 5.43 % DT I

i1

NOV

:1

.I

:1

Prelnise Facility Nanle Elnissions Unit Paralneter 1st Quarter 2011 4th Quarter 2010 3rd Quarter 201 {) !

I

ID I

I

B001 NOx (lb/hr) 20.14 % EE 18.16 % EE I 0124000132 ASA Bloolningburg

I B002 NOx (lb/hr) 20.14 % EE 18.16 % EE

Page 2 of 4
EAR

Prelnise Facility Nalne Elnissions Unit Paralneter 1st Quarter 2011 4th Quarter 2010 3rd Quarter 20 l

ID

B003 S02 (lbhnlnBtu) 16.62 %DT

Opacity 100 % DT 100 % DT 100 % DT I

0616000000 Conesville - AEP B004 ,

S02 (lbhnmBtu) 10.95 % DT 8.03 % DT I

B008 Opacity 10.68 % DT I

j

I

BI03 H2S (gr/DSCF) 9.44 % EE 18.29 010 EE 14.67 % EE I

I ----;

B104 H2S (gr/DSCF) 9.44 % EE 18.29 010 EE 14.67 ~/o EE II

BIOS H2S (gr/DSCF) 9.44 % EE 18.29 % EE 14.67 % EE I'

B106 H2S (gr/DSCF) 9.44 % EE 18.29%EE 14.67 % EE I

BI07 H2S (gr/DSCF) 9.44 % EE 18.290/0EE 14.67 ~/o EE I 0641090010 Severstal SteeI 9.44 % EE I

BI08 H2S (gr/DSCF) 18.290/0EE 14.67 ~/o EE i

I

9.44 % EE !

P006 H2S (gr/DSCF) 18.29 %EE 14.67 ~/o EE 11

P007 H2S (gr/DSCF) 9.44 0

10 EE 18.29 % EE 14.67 ~/o EE Ii

l!

ij

9.44 % EE ,i

P008 H2S (gr/DSCF) 18.29 % EE 14.67 ~/o EE 11

!J

!l

P911 H2S (gr/DSCF) 9.44 % EE 18.29 % EE 14.67 ~/o EE 11

II

'1

B007 Opacity 100 % DT 100 % DT 100 ~/;) DT II

B008 Opacity 100 % DT 100 % DT 100 ~/o DT II

B009 Opacity 100 % DT 100 % DT 100'%DT I

0641160017 FirstEnergy - Salnmis Station BOlO Opacity 100 % DT 100 % DT 100 ~/o DT I

BOll Opacity 100 % DT 100 % DT 100 % DT 1

B012 Opacity 1000/0DT 100 0/oDT 100 ~/o DT I

I

B013 Opacity 100 010 DT 100 % DT 100 ~/o DT II

!

B014 CO (lbhnlnBtu) 22.73 % EE I

i

0671010028 Glatfelter

BOIS CO (lbhnmBtu) 22.73 % EE I

i

P801 S02 (lb/hr) 47.18 % DT 38.50 % DT

0679000251 Belden Brick COlnpany P802 S02 (lb/lu4

) 47.18 % DT 38.50 % DT

P803 S02 (lb/hr) 47.18 % DT 38.50 % DT

Page 3 of 4
IId

EAR il

il

II

Prelnise Facility Nalne Elnissions Unit Paralneter 1st Quarter 2011 4th Quarter 2010 3I'd Quarter 20 11

II

ID 11I,

NOx (lb/hr) 19.88 % EE 67.89 % DT 22.58 % DT I

BOOI 44.99 % EE 14.22 % EE

NOx (lb/mlnBtu) 67.89 % DT 22.58 % DT

0819750245 Anderson's Ethanol 67.89 % DT 22.580/0DT NOx (lb/hr) 19.88 % EE

B002 44.99 % EE 14.22 % EE

NOx (lb/lnmBtu) 67.890/0DT 22.58 ~/o DT

1431350817 E.I. Dupont De Nelnours & Co. POOl S02 (lb/ton acid prod) 100 %DT

Emissions Unit

ID ,

0278000463 IWCI Steel, Warrren I B001 Opacity

0448010035 ISunoco TerminaL, Toledo I J001 THC (pPln)

P902 S02 (lb/hr)

0773000182 IHaverhill North Coke COlnpany I P902 Hg (lb/hr)

1667000007 IOmnova Solutions I P004 I THC (lb/hr)

I

B003

I

Opacity

1677010757 IAkron Thennal, L.P.

B004 Opacity

r;E .:= C?:'A1S recorded excess enlission.,;

Page 4 of 4

6.19 % EE

29.84 % DT

11.80 % DT

36.96 ~/oDT

9.56 % DT

t0.55 ~/~ OT

25.60 % DT

55.51 % DT

55.51 % DT