alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Mack V. Traynor, III, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of HEI, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c)  Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.    /s/ Mack V. Traynor, III   Mack V. Traynor, III
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-1410 Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-033-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Replacement 12.0 $1,020.0

0

$9,995 $11,015.00 8 $88,120.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $88,120

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs: 

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS OF THORATEC
LABORATORIES CORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JULY 1, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                       5,937,966
<SECURITIES>                                12,254,321
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,500,803
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  7,839,247
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,779,242
<PP&E>                                      12,499,384
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,295,219)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,036,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,540,265
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    89,446,729
<OTHER-SE>                                (51,662,426)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,036,481
<SALES>                                      7,261,021
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,465,804
<CGS>                                        2,560,869
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,560,869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,539,459
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                365,476
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,547
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            353,929
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   353,929
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 7590-010]

      ( print page 10475)    
                    1. By letter filed January 23, 2015, the City of Nashua, New Hampshire informed the Commission that the exemption from licensing for the Jackson Mills Project, FERC No. 7590, originally issued April 24, 1984,[1]                                          has been transferred from Nashua Hydro Associates to the City of Nashua, New Hampshire. The project is located on the Nashua River in Hillsborough County, New Hampshire. The transfer of an exemption does not require Commission approval.                

2. The City of Nashua, New Hampshire is now the exemptee for the Jackson Mills Project, FERC No. 7590. All correspondence should be forwarded to: Ms. Sarah Marchant, Division Director, City of Nashua, New Hampshire, Community Development Division, 229 Main Street, Nashua, New Hampshire 03060.

Dated: February 19, 2015.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             27 FERC ¶ 62,078, Order Granting Exemption From Licensing of a Small Hydroelectric Project of 5 Megawatts or Less.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2015-03998 Filed 2-25-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# CE2004084EN.01032503.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/325 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/325

---

(2004/C 84 E/0381)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0172/04

by Christopher Heaton-Harris (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(29 January 2004)

Subject:   Commission's accounting systems

Subject:

I understand the Internal Audit Service, in a report entitled ‘IAS Review of the Commission's Accounting Framework — Final Report’ dated 15 April 2003, made a number of recommendations to the Commission regarding the accounting systems.

Could the Commission confirm that general rules on the valuation of stocks are applied without any exception throughout the Commission?

---
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release # 03-14

Contact: (703) 808-5050 April 8, 2014

NRO Inducts the 2013 Class of Pioneers

Ms. Betty Sapp, the Director of the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), 

inducted two new Pioneers of National Reconnaissance into NRO’s Pioneer Hall on 

Friday, 21 March 2014. The 2013 Pioneers are Mr. William G. Montgomery and Dr. 

Donald N. Simkins, two individuals who made innovative contributions that changed the 

discipline and practice of national reconnaissance. Mr. Montgomery pioneered precision 

control and pointing accuracies for imagery intelligence collection, and Dr. Simkins 

pioneered the development of processing techniques that allowed the dramatic 

advancement of geolocation algorithms.

Ms. Stephanie O’Sullivan the Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence 

(PDDNI), was the guest speaker at the ceremony and co-presented the pioneers with a 

small replica of the Pioneer medallion and citation that are on display in NRO’s Pioneer 

Hall. Ms. O’Sullivan observed how Mr. Montgomery’s innovations have been critical 

both in designing and coordinating the operation of imaging reconnaissance systems, 

and how critical Dr. Simkins’ pioneering innovations have been for almost every spacebased geolocation system in operation.

As Pioneers of National Reconnaissance, Mr. Montgomery and Dr. Simkins are 

classic examples of leading engineering minds in the intelligence community. Both 

individuals faced and overcame technical challenges with their pioneering innovations 

that led to superior intelligence collection from space. Building upon their foundation, 

today’s NRO strives to provide a global perspective when users need the information. 

Over the past fourteen years, the NRO has recognized 90 pioneers. Designation as a 

Pioneer of National Reconnaissance is the highest honor in the field. 

-NROThe NRO is a joint Department of Defense-Intelligence Community organization responsible for 

developing, launching, and operating America’s intelligence satellites to meet the national 

security needs of our nation.
REF ID:A517380 

-.. 

T01) SECRET 

London, 

7th ~une, 1951. 

·LSIB/99/51 

Chairman, 

u.s.c.1.B. 

I am happy to inform you that the London Signal 

Intelligence Board hes approved thj Reporl of the U.S. - U.K. Conference on the Security of Gommunica.tidhs 

held in Washington, commencing 1st May, 1951, and has 

decided that it does not require the approval of any 

higher British authority.' 

will iriform O.d.C .I.E. whether it considers that the 

req~site conditions for an approach to the I !have 

been met. Meanwhile, in accordance with the/f'ecommendation 

8hat U.S.C.I.B. and L.S.I.B. should keep th.is problem und..er 

continuous review, and in order that the way shall be as 

far as possible paved for speedy action/whenever it is 

agreed that an approach to the I lis warranted, a 

draft brief to the U.S. and U.K. ....__~~~~~~~~---' 

is being prepared for discussion between the representatives 

of our two Boards. 

1s1 ...__I __ __. 

Chairman, 

London Signal Intelligence Board 

EQ/3. 3 ( h) ( 2) 

J?f/ 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-07-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
TAP s~FR~et5t19-.7BroE Tbis docum~'- .~yt-ilYNlf&± ::'W>f9'~ciaillM~nated 1 ... cordance with com .. munication. intell~~ r~cltialJ~d'llda..A.hP information reported herein. 

WaehiDgton 25, D .. c .. 

cm 00037 

8 APRIL 1953 

MJllCIWml.lt .Li'C.B THE CHAIBMAI A LClaXll $IGBAL Il'l'JIJJGlll:E BOABD 

SUBJ'JlCl'~ Bel.ease of Cat to I laoverment EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

l. Eef'erence ia made to YO\tt memorandum of 8 December 1952 

2. iBCIB is pleued to learn that LSJ.la . CQClCWS in U3CIB •• 

clecisioo t.o rel.ease the Cal to the I IGovenment. In tbis 

respect, Lt is pertinent to note that 1.ECIB would .not have takeD 

th:l.e deci l"iion as it did but f'or the knowledge that I.SIB bad re· 

cei ved aG•~quate notice of tbe I I intent1ona . Despite thia , 

bt:;JVever, .Lt ia regretted that l.SIB vaa not directly Wormed ot 

this mat t~.r before the U3CIB decision vae made. It ia believed 

that the c:ambinatioo of circumstancee attending tbeae negotie.tiona, 

SIS descrl\,ed belcN, may be informative a.ad hel.~4\ll in UDd.er&tenJJing 

tllle la.ck c£ o.f'fi.cial prior notice to lSIBo 

5 The• matter VWJ plac:eQ before UBCTB in .. 'f»ly 1952 In wigh1nv 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 09-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352f3 
3.3(h)(2). 

86-36/50 USC 3605 T pp s irt!R1

R t51d~A~~-I 0 E This documen .... ::1 to be w.a<l on!y by thuse personnel officially ind.octrina.~e<l in - ... ~ordaoce with co.r;n ... 

munication intelhgence !j,~rurity re~lations and author1~d lo rPcel ve thf> information reported herein. 

1 

6. Baaed~ t:beee CODSiderationa, a decision vu t111ally mde 

by U3CIB in tavor or eosiating tbel l and ISI» vu adv1sed. or UaS .. 

intentions in advance of 8ZlY definite cCllAli tment to tbe I L Ill 

tact, the mach:Jneo requested by them have oot l"tt been provia.td nor has 

8JlY other· teelmical aeeiatance been supp.lied. 

7. With respect to your 1Jlqu1ry coacerning "tec)mj.cal eniatance 

ss an alternate or supplement," the latter ~f'era to changeable 

elements, instructiOllS tor operation, eecuri ty regulatiai:m, •tc. , 8114 

even the possibility of providing ?r.eyz and of wiring :roton.. Tlle f'cm119r 

refers in partieular to a paper and pencil cry])tographic n;yBtea u a 

substitute for a cipher machine. However, a auggeatic:m tbat nch a 

system might be used met vi th no intereat on the. part ot tbe._I __ __, representative. 

2 EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A517079 

TPP SECRET CAJ-IQE Tbis documen~ _.., to be rt~.ad only b_v those personnel Hffi.cially indoctrinated in .·-Jrdan~ with com .. 

munication intelligence 9Pcurlty regulatior.~ and author1zetl to rnceive thiP information reported herein. 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 ALU!:B W.. DULIES 

Cha.irman 

United States CnnmmicatiOll.8 Intelligence Board 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000351116
<NAME> FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,988
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,930
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    166,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               284,334
<PP&E>                                       1,892,906
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,369,296
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 959,169
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          147,130
<BONDS>                                        536,519
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,400
<COMMON>                                           348
<OTHER-SE>                                   (124,493)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   959,169
<SALES>                                        637,086
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               637,086
<CGS>                                          906,009
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  906,009
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,341
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,895
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (355,698)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (91,800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (151,917)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (151,917)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (6.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.55)
        

</TABLE>
.l\\\--~\\o(\q\\\ 


~\C\.{\~ 
l\\~(\-\ \O<\~\ \ ] 

B\Cd"\~ 
.If\\-e. {\'\-,OX\C,,-\\1' 

\j\lA(\~ 
l(\\,<-'\\\\ D(\4\\.~ 

B\C4..()h 
1,,,kmiol\kl\'1 

B\lX<t ~ 
l<\kf\\ \ o (\Ct\\.y 

\)\[,,\\.~ 
l", ~(\-\-\D(\Gt\ll 


~\~{\ 'K 

her) 

POLYCARD XFN-1S0 

WARNING 

HAZARD STATEMENT 

air. If Wash skin 

soap and water. Seek medical 

attention If irritation develops 

or persists. 

Flush eyes with plenty of water 

fur at least 15 minutest while 

holding eyelids open. Seek 

medical attention immediately. 

Composite Technical Services, llC. 

2000 Composite Dr. 

Kettering, Ohio 45420, USA 

Tel: (937) 296-5034 

Fax: (937)296-5035 

Tel Number: .....UIII::AJI"rn·1I::r 

with adequate ventilation. 

DO not induce • Never 

give anything by mouth to an 

unconscious person. Seek 

medical attention immediately. 
.I\\-\~\'\-\, 0 f\a. \ \ l' 

))\Cd\~
September 2020

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Irrigation Water Management (Code 449) 

The process of determining and controlling the volume,

frequency, and application rate of irrigation water. 

Practice Information 

Irrigation water management is primarily used to manage

soil moisture to promote plant growth. It can also be used

to optimize use of available water supplies, minimize

irrigation-induced erosion, reduce surface and ground

water pollution, manage salts in the root zone,improve poor

plant productivity and health, reduce energy use,and provide for safe chemigation or fertigation.

Additional uses include management of air, soil, or plant microclimates and dust control. 

Proper irrigation scheduling is the most critical component of this practice. The operator must

understand when it is time to irrigate, how much water to apply, and where the water is going when it

is applied. The operator must also know how to prevent erosion and ground water contamination and

how to adjust the system to account for these concerns. Additional specialized requirements apply to

surface, subsurface, and pressurized irrigation systems. 

When irrigation is used for chemical, nutrient, or wastewater application, it should be scheduled to

coincide with the irrigation cycle in order to avoid excess runoff to surface water or leaching to ground

water. 

Irrigation water management is an annual practice that may change with the crops grown. 

Common Associated Practices 

NRCS Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Irrigation Water Management (Code 449) is a required

component when CPSs Sprinkler System (Code 442), Irrigation System, Microirrigation (Code

441), or Irrigation System, Surface and Subsurface (Code 443) are used. 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.