alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
us cm: lJ.!J/101 

2~ 1-B.rch 1955 

6El0Ri:.1f 

Subject: Possible Conpromise of co:n::·zr In!'ormtion. 

l. U.3. Ifavy VRl aircra!'t DIDD 128441 i'light 124/30 outl;our~ 

i'rom U.3. I!aval .i.\ir Station, Pa.tu.xaJ.1t, I~land, to La.jea, Azores, 

crashed betuoen the hours or OLIJ3Z and ll52Z, 31 Cctober 19~4. 

2. This a.ircrur~"' 11as carryinJ 227 pounds oi' officer caiirior 

mail iucluding eleven (il) packo.ges oi' am:mr i:iaterie.J.. All 

ofi'icer courier 1&t.toric..l was loco.tad in a scaled co1.:tpa.rtme~1t 

in the bolly oi' the aircraft. 

3. The last report heard froL'l this aircraft ,.,as at l'"/Ol..03Z 

October. Its position at that time 1o1as given as J8-U61i, 69-12W 

(~bovo the Atlantic Ocean about '"/~O miles east or Washington). 

'~· Search and rescue operations vore conducted during the 

period::> 31 Octol.or - 3 llovember and 6 - 11 liovember. The search, 

said to ta tr.a most extensive over conducted by tl:.e :tiavy, i:ivolved 

soIOa 200 Ea.ircrL.ft and 26 suri'o.ce vessels and covered an area. of 

7 ili.llion squaro miles. 

5. r:o trc.ce of the wreckage has baen found. 

6. Account&.bility for the CD2In1r rna.torial aboEi.rd this aircraft hue ",.)een lost. IJ.owevar, be.sod on tho ..1.bove fucts, it doos 

r.ot appear tl.Ja.t there is any reasonable basis i'or a preaur.iption 

that this 1116.taricl. could have found its wa:r into m:s.uti!Orizod 

hands. 

7. It is therefore reco:m:iended that the a.bove incident be 

co.nsidai·ed as ir.ivolvillb no cot:1promse to tha CUi!C:'r rJS.terllll 

aboard the aircrai't. 

a. The a.Love i'acta o.Jld reco:im:JDnda.tio1.L a.re oubr:ti.tted in 

accordc:.r..ce 1:itll 3ection V, CIDD /fJ, dated J., Februo.ry 1954. 

1JSC!ij: 1.3.5/101 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-21-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 

SECRET 

24
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

1.   Each of The DeWolfe Company, Inc., DeWolfe Relocation Services, Inc.,
     DeWolfe Mortgage Services, Inc., The DeWolfe Insurance Agency, Inc., and
     DeWolfe.com, Inc. is a Massachusetts corporation and is a wholly-owned
     subsidiary of The DeWolfe Companies, Inc.

2.   Each of Hillshire House, Inc., A Connecticut corporation, J.W. Riker
     Northern Rhode Island, Inc., a Rhode Island Corporation, Mark Stimson
     Associates, A Maine Corporation, and DeWolfe Realty Affiliates, A Maine
     Corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The DeWolfe Company, Inc.

3.   Referral Associates of New England, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation, is
     a wholly-owned subsidiary of DeWolfe Relocation Services, Inc.

4.   Real Estate Referral, Inc., a Connecticut corporation, is a wholly-owned
     subsidiary of Hillshire House, Inc.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, 

INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JOCELYN BENSON, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 No. 20-1567C

 (Filed: November 12, 2020)

ORDER

On November 10, 2020, the Plaintiffs, Donald Trump for President, Inc, et al., filed the 

present action with the United States Court of Claims. Complaint, ECF No. 1. The complaint 

names as defendants Jocelyn Benson (in her official capacity as Michigan Secretary of State), as 

well as several state and county entities. It purports to ground jurisdiction on 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 

and 1343. Id. The plaintiffs allege the commission of violations of the United States 

Constitution, the Michigan Constitution, and Michigan law, in Wayne County, Michigan during

the recent Presidential election. They seek a variety of injunctive relief.

The complaint is captioned as though it were filed in the United States District Court for 

the Western District of Michigan. Instead, however, it was filed with this Court, presumably by 

accident.

Jurisdiction is a threshold matter, Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 523 U.S. 83, 

94–95 (1998), and the Court may raise the issue on its own at any time without a motion from a 

party, Folden v. United States, 379 F.3d 1344, 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2004); see also Rule 12(h)(3) of 

the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (stating that “[i]f the court determines at any time that it 

lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, the court must dismiss the action).

The Tucker Act grants the United States Court of Federal Claims jurisdiction over 

monetary actions “against the United States founded either upon the Constitution, or any Act of 

Congress or any regulation of an executive department, or upon any express or implied contract 

with the United States, or for liquidated or unliquidated damages in cases not sounding in tort.” 

28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1). It does not confer jurisdiction over claims against any entity other than 
2

the United States. United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584, 588 (1941). Further, the Court lacks 

jurisdiction over claims for injunctive relief unless such relief is “incident of and collateral to” a 

monetary judgment, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(2), which means it is “tied and subordinate to a money 

judgment,” James v. Caldera, 159 F.3d 573, 580 (Fed. Cir. 1998) (quoting Austin v. United 

States, 206 Ct. Cl. 719, 723 (1975)).

The present complaint involves claims against state and local government entities, not the 

United States. It also requests injunctive relief not collateral to a money judgment. The Court 

lacks jurisdiction over the complaint. A transfer of the complaint is warranted in the interests of 

justice. Therefore, the Court directs that the Clerk TRANSFER the case to the United States 

District Court for the Western District of Michigan in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Elaine D. Kaplan 

ELAINE D. KAPLAN

Judge
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

Wnttrb ~tatr~ ~ourt of §ppeaI~ 

for !be jf eberaI ~trcutt 

LANDMARK SCREENS, LLC, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

MORGAN, LEWIS, & BOCKIUS, LLP, 

AND THOMAS D. KOHLER, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

2011-1297 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California in case no. 08-CV-2581, 

Judge Jeremy Fogel. 

ON MOTION 

ORDER 

Landmark Screens, LLC moves for a 45-day extension 

of time, until July 21, 2011, to file its opening brief and 

moves for a 30-day extension of time, until September 29, 

2011, for the appellees' to file their responsive brief. 

Upon consideration thereof, 
LANDMARK SCREENS v. MORGAl\ LEWIS 

IT Is ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is granted. 

JUL 192011 

Date 

cc: Clark S. Stone, Esq. 

Steven P. Ragland, Esq. 

s21 

FOR THE COURT 

/s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk 

FilED 

u.s. COURT OF APPEALS FOR 

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

JUl 19 20t1 

JANHORBALY 

ClERK 

2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

   We hereby consent to the use in Amendment No. 3 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (the "Registration Statement") of our report dated July
2, 1999, except for Footnote M which is dated October 6, 1999 relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Be Free, Inc. and its subsidiaries, which
appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the references to us
under the headings "Experts" and "Selected Consolidated Financial Data" in such
Registration Statement.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

October 8, 1999
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6883

ANDRE JUSTE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. AGENT MARTINEZ; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; JAMES COMEY, Director; LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General; ASHTON CARTER; JAMES POWELL COLLINGS; BARACK OBAMA , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Mary G. Lewis , District Judge. ( 4:16

- cv
- 03833

- MGL )

Submitted : December 18, 2018 Decided: December 2 1 , 2018

Before AGEE, THACKER, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

.
Andre Juste, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Andre Juste seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Juste’s civil action without prejudice. We may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders of the district court, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral order s, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541,
545

- 46 (1949). We conclude that the order Juste seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Good e v. Cent

. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y , 807 F.3d 619 (4th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to
the district court with instructions to allow Juste to reinstate his case and file an amended complaint. We d ispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED
~~F 

REF ID:A66089 .... ._._......., ... ...,.. .............. ~ 

'9'N~lU:l±iN _l_l1,., 

DEPAR'nmr.f OP DBYdSI 

ABiBJl FORCE SFmlll'l'Y AGmct 

WASHmro• 2s~ n. c. 

lelf!BMfldi .. SBemli'ff :Bff'eliU;'ff81 

l2 llareh 1952 

oaGAllIZATmW 

lxeclt.tive Group tor Spae:lal Cl-Jptologic A4Tia017 _Gl'Ol!P (SCAO) 

1. ~e. !he Ezecati.ve Gro111> for SC &G Atf~ ill eat&bliahc 

1d.1ih1n t.h8 8Cl l'orees Seeei.tJ' .lgeae7 1io Cf od.u't nweua&ll'J' 11tilloa 

v1tb SCAG llfllbers, to us1Bt. ill the operatiou ot SCl.G5 to attend its 

•et.ings, and to ausce implementation ot ap_ll'OTed ~tioas 

mde b7' it.. 

2. Rem.bership. The Gl'01IP will. be eamp•ecl oft 

C.pta!D J. S. Harper~ USR 

Dr o A. S:lnkcw 

Dr. H. H. CMpeipe 

Co.uultal:t,, Cba1n1aD . ./ 

Chief', OJfice ot Reaarcb and 

D•el.GPJ11 mt, Vice Chsirallll 

Chief', 0~1ce or Opemtion 

TGClmiea l Director, Of.tic• of 

Open.tiM:IS 

Head.11 0 ~-wtoml(&th..,ticaJ. Di"f'• 

iaim,, ot.tice or Reaeush .. 

Devel.81,Ane't 

lo Beapcmsibilit.i•<lt Thea Cba1nlm rill htave the :tolleloi.Dg n- ' 

epouibilntee. &Di iU1 68 ua:U.1ted u :iequired b7 t.ha other mMben 

~ the Gr~1 

a. Presentation& to SCAG, 1m:lud.i!1g 'V'i81t8 to ac'ti'ri.t.ta with 

11111.eh it •7 be eomarn:ac:.I. 

b. Aoa1ating the SCA.G Chainim in arrupnw.mts tor SCAG aeetilap. 

e. Preparaticm ot queatJ.cms 1tncl ct:l.scuaim 'topics ror conterences 

with iDd:tYid.ual Sc4.G Dl8llbc1·ra and erugemGnt.a tor MCUU.17 

'Yi8ita iD CODlJ8CtiOD theftrdt.111. 

4. P:repamt.1ol'.l ot reporw,, st udi:•• aDd. other materials reques1*l bJ' SCAG or imlirtdual memb ~ thereof'. 

e. Preparation ot progrees rep.l:~ OD actift agenr:la 1w. .. i.e.• 

on it.ma aeticn on which iii pending or not 19t. caapl.eted. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-14-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

CONFIDENTIAL 
• 

REF ID: A660§..9 

• l2 Much 1952 

fo IllplelleD1:At.ton ot projects~ contra.eta, or eachine studies u 

zreem:me1.fod by SClG. . 

I• Cooperation vi.th t.ho Research and Developmsnt Bou-J Secre'kriAt 

a my bca required .. 

h. Ac:lYiBing the Dinetoi-, u appropl"iata, a utW. J)Q!'iiaining 

to SQA.Q., 

io le·t.blubmnt ot .Baecllt.tve Group pitocedm.•ea. 

4o Sem.-ater:ta:t.. Dr. f.t •• ' H. ClmpD....igne vill be reaponsible'° tor 

prori.ding neceiii:ry iecratm.":i.Al s~ice:s tor the Gro'lfP. !hera will 

iDc'l'Ude •intmanee ot necSl!IBU"y. technical records ard tiles,. c\'!Bto«V' 

ot elaaaitied material. rettui.tYf!d bJ' SCAG ~ • am ha.ndl.f.n& ot ~ehn:lcal Co.i'i'e&pond.ence. ( Tnval O?d~s, reillb~.sement. notices aad · · 

other ad111D:lsttutive det.ills tae SCAG are the conc8l'Al of the B.eac:arcb 

ud. Dnelopment. BOll&Z'd Seeret1 w.U.t.) 

So Proe<ad.ureo !he Gro~-p v.lll meet. on Cldl ot 'tne Cbairmime 

- -· 

DISTJUBUf"!OR 

Members ot Group CS) 

Rm (llr. Dau Poat) 

Babena ot SCAG (13) 

Ch1at of Stat't 

Adjllt!mt Gcmenl (3) 

Oh• P.IJms & Pol. Db· 

DeputJ' Director, &av 

llD 2 c:r 

;• 

' 

e 1
Exhibit 32.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Jeffrey S. Mathiesen, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Delphax Technologies Inc.(the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 (1)  the accompanying Quarterly Report on From 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.           Dated: May 2, 2005   By:   /s/ Jeffrey S. Mathiesen                  Jeffrey S. Mathiesen         Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
p.1 

OAR Box 1147 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

179) IV-E-52 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:57 PM Sheet 179 of 242 
P.2 

ft't37-Jrl 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105 

JUN 1.6 1988 OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: EPA/Mitsubishi Chemical Industries, LTD. Meeting 

FROM: 

TO: 

THRU: 

Jean M. Schwendeman, Mechanical Engineer J&^/,y5&^u*

/

*^^ 

Standards Development and Support Branchy 

Public Docket A-87-11 j \ 

Chester J. France, Chief Wl/^X I 

Standards Development anwSuppo anch 

representatives of 

(MCI) and of 

with representatives of EPA's 

Mitsubishi 

Mitsubishi 

Office of 

On May 12, 1988 several 

Chemical Industries Limited 

International met 

Mobile Sources at the Motor Vehicle Emission Laboratory in Ann 

Arbor, Michigan to discuss onboard refueling emission 

controls. MCI is a Japanese manufacturer of activated carbon. 

Mitsubishi International is their parent company. A list of 

attendees is attached. 

At the start of the meeting, EPA related to MCI the 

anticipated upcoming order of events regarding EPA's current 

NPRM for onboard refueling emission controls. We stated that 

we plan to resubmit our safety analysis to the National Highway 

Traffic Safety Association, obtain their comments, and then 

repropose onboard refueling controls in the fall of this year. 

MCI then presented a written description of their current 

automotive grades of activated carbon which have the brand name 

DIAHOPE. They asked that we keep this information 

confidential. This written report also discussed the important 

parameters of pore size, bulk density and hardness. MCI did 

not wish to discuss a new "higher quality" activated carbon 

that they had previously mentioned to EPA because it is still 

only in the development stage. They also did not wish to 

discuss the cost of any grade of activated carbon they 

produce. MCI agreed to EPA's request for 5 kilograms of 

DIAHOPE EQ carbon for comparative in-house testing purposes. 

EPA gave Mitsubishi International a description of our in-house 

carbon efficiency test method we are presently using to 

evaluate gasoline vapor working capacity. This method will be 

documented in a separate memo to the record. 

Attachment 

6053W 
'?-

EPA/Mitsubishi Chemical Industries Meeting 

May 12, 1988 

P.3 

Jean Schwendeman 

Karen Lostoski 

Ken Von Hertsenburg 

Goichi Okubo 

Akira Ikeda 

Shuji Kuwano 

EPA 

EPA 

Mitsubishi International 

Mitsubishi International 

Mitsubishi Chemical Industries, LTD, 

Mitsubishi Chemical Industries, LTD,
Exhibit 11


                                   KSW, INC.
                       Statement Regarding Computation of
                     Net Earnings (Loss) per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                  Six Months      Six Months      Three Months    Three Months
                                                  Ended 6/30/99   Ended 6/30/98   Ended 6/30/99   Ended 6/30/98

<S>                                                 <C>           <C>               <C>           <C>
        Net Earnings/(Loss)                         $93,000       $(656,000)        $6,000        $(325,000)
                                                   =========       =========     ===========      ==========
        Earnings/(Loss) per Share - Primary
        Weighted Average Shares outstanding
          during the period                       5,468,644       5,458,366      5,468,644        5,458,366
                                                  =========       =========      ===========     ===========
        Earnings/(Loss) per Common Share
        Primary                                        $.02           ($.12)          ($.0)           ($.06)
                                                  =========       ==========     ===========     ===========
        Earnings/(Loss) per Share - Diluted
        Weighted Average Shares outstanding
          during the period                       5,468,644       5,458,366      5,468,644        5,458,366

        Common and Common Stock equivalent
          shares using the treasury stock method          0         283,182              0          242,912
                                                  -----------    -------------  --------------   ------------

        Total Shares Outstanding for purposes
          of calculating diluted earnings/(loss)  5,468,644       5,741,548      5,468,644        5,701,278
                                                  =========       =========      =========        ==========

        Earnings/(Loss) per Common and                 $.02           ($.11)             0            ($.06)
          Common Equivalent Share - Diluted       =========       =========      =========        ==========
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Christina W. HaganChristina W. HaganExecutive Vice President, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer)
~Rlif:A6616. 

USCIB: 9.6/4 

26 April 1955 

SESHef 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Counter Clandestine CCMINT Planning. 

USCIB 9.6/"J dated 18 April 1955. 

l. USCIBEC cons~dered the reference at its 28th Meeting, 22 April 

1955, and agreed to approve the Intelligence Committee recommendations 

quoted therein subject to the following amendments: 

a. Page 3, Paragraph 2a. Add the following to the final 

sentence of the paragraph: 

"without bringing that Commission into the COMINT business". 

b. Page 4, Paragraph 3a. Add the following to the last 

sentence: 

"at the same time recognizing the responsibilities of the 

Department of Defense with regard to military activities". 

c. Page 5, Paragraph 3d, Line 3: Delete the word "approval" 

and substitute "consideration" therefor. 

2. The foregoing decision of USCIBEC is forwarded for consideration. In the absence of objection by the close of business on 6 May 

1955 the recommendation will be considered approved. 

USCIB: 9.6/4 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-02-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

SECRET
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             991                   1,562
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,763                   5,576
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,655)                   (439)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,760                   7,340
<PP&E>                                           4,336                   3,475
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,791)                 (1,294)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,086                  14,479
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,058                   3,646
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            8,467                   8,455
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             1                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                         561                     580
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,086                  14,479
<SALES>                                         23,260                  16,716
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,260                  16,716
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,673                  16,834
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 172                     139
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (7)                   (385)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                   (155)
<NET-INCOME>                                       (7)                   (540)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)                  (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)                  (0.38)


</TABLE>