alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000350920
<NAME> MEDIQ INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               9
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,484
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (25,580)
<INVENTORY>                                     21,283
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,478
<PP&E>                                         303,016
<DEPRECIATION>                               (189,366)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 359,901
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          620,619
<BONDS>                                            377
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          135,293
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (406,096)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   359,901
<SALES>                                         19,688
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,530
<CGS>                                           16,322
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,528
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (56)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,860
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,802)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        25
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,827)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,827)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (14.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (14.60)


</TABLE>
# CE2004088EN.01023701.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/237 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/237

---

(2004/C 88 E/0239)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0850/04

by Salvador Jové Peres (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(11 March 2004)

Subject:   Correction for irregular grant of supplementary processed tomato quotas

Subject:

Commission Decision 2004/136/EC (1) of 4 February 2004 lays down a financial correction of EUR 8,7 million for Spain on account of the irregular grant of supplementary processed tomato quotas and of shortcomings in checks on the quality of the end products.

1

What was involved in the shortcomings in checks on the quality of the end products? In what marketing years did such shortcomings occur?

As regards the irregular grant of supplementary processed tomato quotas, what irregularities have given rise to the correction? In what marketing years did they occur? What volume of supplementary quotas was granted improperly in each marketing year? To how many firms were supplementary quotas granted improperly in each of the marketing years to which the correction relates? How many firms were eligible for the supplementary quotas in each of the marketing years to which the correction relates?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(2 April 2004)

(2 April 2004)

In answer to the questions raised, the Honourable Member and Parliament's Secretariat have been sent a summary report extract explaining the grounds for the financial correction contained in Decision 2004/136/EC (2) with respect to the processed tomato sector in Spain.

2

Please also note the following points:

| — | the marketing years covered by the correction are: 1997/98 (very small amount concerning only the correction for quality control of finished products), 1998/99, 1999/2000, 2000/01; |
| --- | --- |

—

the marketing years covered by the correction are: 1997/98 (very small amount concerning only the correction for quality control of finished products), 1998/99, 1999/2000, 2000/01;

| — | the volumes of the additional quotas granted are: 35 027 tonnes (1998/99), 14 341 tonnes (1999/2000), 21 224 tonnes (2000/2001). |
| --- | --- |

—

the volumes of the additional quotas granted are: 35 027 tonnes (1998/99), 14 341 tonnes (1999/2000), 21 224 tonnes (2000/2001).

In theory, all firms which purchased, at the minimum price, a quantity of raw materials exceeding the quota allocated at the beginning of the marketing year benefited from the additional quotas;

In theory, all firms which had said that they were willing to conclude contracts for additional quantities would have been eligible for the additional quotas.

---

(1)  OJ L 40, 12.2.2004, p. 31.

1

(2)  Decision 2004/136/EC: Commission Decision of 4 February 2004 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF).

2

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  
                                                               Exhibit 23.3     
          
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT     
   
We consent to the use in this Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement No.
333-66947 of Summit Technology, Inc. on Form S-4 of our report on Autonomous
Technologies Corporation, and Subsidiary, dated February 22, 1999, except for
Note 13, as to which the date is March 16, 1999, appearing in the Prospectus,
which is part of this Registration Statement.     
   
We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such
Prospectus.     
   
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP     
   
Orlando, Florida     
   
March 22, 1999
::.' 

·1EMO ROUTIN_G SLIP 

1 NAME OR TITLE~ ~ • J. 

• C7 0 I .I W\ Air" 

lllTIALS 

ORUNIZATIOll AND LOCATION DATE 

EO 3.3(h 2) 

z 

4. 

CIRC\A.ATE 

CXICIRDINATIOfll 

lllFOllllATIOfl 

llECISIARY 

ACJIDll 

llEID 

llGNATUll 

eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 08-19-2014 

3526 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION 

· ---ll:[fi;O~P~e:t:E~C±:;R~E]J-- TEIDllCINI 

DD F8lll 95 ~DAAOOl'-llU.1Apr41,1114A1'11Q •moo:ini.o- 1 FEB IO Palm 12, 10 NOT C7, •blab lllQ lie a.cl. 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

REF ID:A67107 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605
99-1480.

#### English v. Seidner.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus by Derrick English. *Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
REF ID:A67173 

IQll&U& 

1. 92e retenmc:es were e;pprowd 'b7 the Joint Chiefs ~ Staft" on 

E JDlm&'l7 1951. In reference a. 1 t vaa recommel24ecl tJJat " ••• tJaere 

be azmual. coaterencea ... tor tbe-nezt rour J8&1"•· .. tba i'inrt ot tbl8e 

t.o take >lace 1n Lot!BoD 1n a.pp:m:1na~ Id.De 'mDtba Um." ?ts.a 

auUcJ.J&W, 'UIAt Wa coatenmce will beg1D on .1 ~ l9'J.. 

2. In on1e:' w :tacil.itate pl mm1na am to pan.1 t the ccmatructioa 

or ~ ecbet11llea1 :Lt 1a ~ tbat all ed41aneee prepare 

cOllllmlta &114 ncor.••otatioDll m tbe tol.l.owS.Dg: 

a. Agenla. 

-

b. Orpn1sat1m of CGmrd.tteee. -

c. 

3. Your co•enta, on tbelte INl>Jecta an4 cm. flA7 otber' :tacete ot 

tb8 :f6'l"tknming conferwe, are requested prior to 1 April. 1951. 

fOP SECREf 

P.COWNS 

l'allnel, Signal carps 

DlpltJbtlr,AfSA
USCIB: 2!].20/18 

'f0P SBe1tE'l 

REF ID:A60274 

TOP SECRET 

20 July 1955 

f'Eo 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

MPHORANDlH FOR mE MEHBEl:lS OF USCIBEC: 

Subject: 

1. In connection with consideration of the status of U.S. and U.K. 

CCllINT units in at its /11 ?th meeting, directed that 

USCIBEC proceed at once to study the above subject with a view to 

developing, for USCIB consideration, a 17': range plan·· ... to·· ... be used as a 

guide for future I • • I 

2. I believe that the most appropriate point of departure for such 

a study, keeping in mind the requirement for pranpt action,\ is the 

preparation by the members directl..y concemed. of information on the 

current and projected status of I koel.ations in\their own particular fields. This information can then be consolidated into a 

single report in such manner as the COmmit.tee deems appropriate. 

,3. It is therefore requested that the follo-.dng member agencies 

proceed with the preparation of the .information indicated, with the 

understanding that the items listed.serve only as guidelines and do not 

prec1ud.e the inc1usion of additional subjects not specifically mentioned: 

d. ARMY: A review of the status, and future expectancy, of 

landline procurement activities. 

USCIB: 29.20/18 

eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-01-2014 pursuant to E.O. 

3526 

24 
.,,. 

USCIB: '2!].2JJ/18 

'!!QP .&GR1JJ? 

REF ID:A60274 rrt~ r.. rwrt,.....,.rtrrt 

l U» Jl!ICJ(:C l 

EO ~.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-"36/50 USC 3605 2JJ July 1955 

Subject: ~I.on ........ -g~R;m,...._g_e~4s-..n_e_rn;_s..._..o_f_U_._s~··~~f ........ ~1--------...Jlwith the I 

3. It is .further requested that the foregoing information, plus 

additional data which any member fee1s may add to the value of the 

Committee report to USCIB, be forwarded to this office by the close of 

business Friday, '2!J Jucy 1955. Consideration by USCIBEC will be scheduled at an early date thereafter. 

USCIB 

USCIB: 2$.20/18 

TOP SECRET
NO. 07-11-00072-CR 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AT AMARILLO 

PANEL D 

APRIL 14, 2011 

JEREMY JAY BROCK, APPELLANT 

v. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 FROM THE 222ND DISTRICT COURT OF DEAF SMITH COUNTY; 

NO. CR-2006D-049; HONORABLE ROLAND D. SAUL, JUDGE 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 Appellant Jeremy Jay Brock attempts to appeal the trial court’s denial of his 

request for appointment of counsel in a proceeding for post-conviction DNA testing 

under Chapter 64 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.1

 Finding we lack appellate 

jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal. 

 The record in this case has not been filed but the clerk of the trial court submitted 

a copy of appellant’s notice of appeal and the trial court’s order denying appellant’s 

request for appointment of counsel. We notified appellant by letter of a possible 

 1

 Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. arts. 64.01-64.05 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010). 
2 

jurisdictional defect and afforded him more than ten days to supply documents or 

matters he deemed necessary for determination of our jurisdiction. Appellant did not 

respond to our notice letter. We have considered our jurisdiction. 

 According to appellant’s notice of appeal he seeks our review of the trial court’s 

order denying his “request for appointment of counsel pursuant to article 64, Code of 

Criminal Procedure, heretofore rendered against him . . . [on] January 21, 2011.” On 

January 21, the trial court signed an order reciting that it had considered appellant’s 

request for appointment of counsel in a Chapter 64 proceeding along with appellant’s 

declaration of inability to pay costs. The court found no reasonable grounds for a 

motion under Chapter 64,2

 and denied appellant’s request for appointment of counsel. 

 “The right to appeal is conferred by the legislature, and generally a party may 

appeal only that which the legislature has authorized.” Vargas v. State, 109 S.W.3d 26, 

29 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 2003, no pet). Thus unless jurisdiction is expressly granted by 

law, an appellate court does not have jurisdiction to review orders made during the 

course of a case before entry of a final order. Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d. 792, 794 

(Tex.Crim.App. 1991). The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has held that an order 

denying appointed counsel under article 64.01(c) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is 

not an immediately appealable order. Gutierrez v. State, 307 S.W.3d 318, 319 

(Tex.Crim.App. 2010). Rather, the order is appealable “if and when” the motion for 

forensic DNA testing is denied. Id. at 323. 

 2

 Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 64.01(c) (West Supp. 2010) (appointment of 

counsel requires court find reasonable grounds for filing motion under Chapter 64). 
3 

 Because appellant seeks review of an interlocutory order over which appellate 

courts have not been given jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 

 James T. Campbell 

 Justice 

Do not publish.
REF ID:A605-

24 

.USCIB: '2!}.17/21 

9 March 1955 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Approval of USCIB ';!9·.17/19 of 29 February 1955. 

There having been no objection during the interregnum period, 

subject paper stands approved and message enclosed therewith has been 

transmitted. 

USCIB: 2!}.17/21 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 05-01-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
-

REF ID:A51735B 

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25. D. C. 

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR 

StJBJICTa lcalmuniaat1ona 3eoul'it7. 

UPlW!ltC&z Let.tar ot 10 Decaber 1951 troa th• Chai,rman, LSIB 

t.o the Ch&irman, USClB (LSIB/zu./51). 

l. On ll Januar.r 1952 t.he Pros.ident/a~ved the ~rt ot the u.s.-u.1. Can!'ereoae Oil t.h• Seour.1.t7 at'I/ comn.mi..catiana. 

2. tJSCIB hu oon.iderod tho rotar«tes lott..cu- .:>.r::d..mak• tho 

tolloadn" o~aarv&tion1: 

W. B. SMITH 

Cbairmn, United ste.t.ea C<: ll'licationa Intolllgcoe 1loard. 

TOP SECRET SltEDE 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 09-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
.. i· -

~ID:A652~ • • J .._.. ~-/ 

....... __ 24 

USCIB: 13.2/46 

16 December 1954 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Clearance for Category III CCMINT (Satterthwaite). 

1. The enclosed request by the CIA member is forwarded for 

consideration by vote sheet. 

2. It is requested that your views on the 11need to know11 of 

Mr. Satterthwaite be forwarded to this office by 1600, 27 December 

1954. 

Enclosure 

CIA Memo dtd 15 Dec 1954. 

USCIB: 1.3.2/46 

SECRE'f 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 09-11-2014 pursuant to E .0. 1352a. 
• ..I ··e ~D:A6529. 

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

MEMORANDWi FOR: Executive Secretary, USCIB 

15 DEC 1954 

SUBJECT Clearance £or Access to Category III COl4INT 

1. The Operations Coordinating Board has requested 

that Mr. Livingston Satterthwaite be granted clearance 

for access to Category III COO.INT information. In order to 

fulfill his responsibilities as Deputy Executive Officer 

and to act in the absence of Mr. Elm.er B. Staats, Executive 

Officer, Mr. Satterthwaite will require access to COMINT. 

Mr. Staats is indoctrinated for Category III CCMINT. 

2. In accordance with the provisions of USCIB Directive 

No. 5, it is requested that USCIB members determine the 

"need-to-know11 of Mr. Satterthwaite and that I be __ so adv;ised. 

/s/ 

tor 

HUNTINGTON D. SHELDON 

CIA Member, USCIB 

Enclosure with USCIB 1.3.2/46 dtd 16 Dec 1954. 

SECRET 

OGA
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                       INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Lycos, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-67995) on Form S-4, the registration statements (Nos. 333-61821, 333-51593,
333-47677 and 333-13715) on Form S-8 and the registration statements (Nos. 333-
61413, 333-60101, 333-52741, 333-51591 and 333-50281) on Form S-3 of Lycos, Inc.
of our report dated February 26, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Wired Ventures, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and
1998, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive
income (loss), minority interest and stockholders' (deficit) equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998,
which report appears in the Form 8-K of Lycos, Inc. dated July 15, 1999.

                                         /s/ KPMG LLP
San Francisco, California
July 15, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,698,000
<SECURITIES>                                12,528,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,473,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   120,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,227,000
<PP&E>                                      71,744,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (33,978,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              63,993,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,090,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,802,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  59,771,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                63,993,000
<SALES>                                     18,646,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,646,000
<CGS>                                       25,856,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,856,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               120,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,539,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,214,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,325,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,325,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.80)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the periodic report of Dawson Geophysical Company (the
"Company") Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, L.
Decker Dawson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d);
          and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: January 28, 2003                  /s/ L. Decker Dawson
                                         --------------------------
                                         Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
C02428567 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 AUGUST 2015 TOP ~EERP 

Handle Via Indicated Controls 

1'.0.11(1 IOEAllSl O:s.C.ld!T CO~ONA GAMBd 

QIJlll _ H~X"GON DORI .... N 

R£PORT 

TO THE 

ADVISO'RY BOA'fro 

O'N THE 

CHESS 

ZARF 

RUFF 

TRINE 

NAT I O'N A L R -E C dl\J"f.J A' 55 AN C E P"R 0 G RAM 

CHESS 

ZARF 

RUFF 

TRINE 

MIY 1 To orcrtl«tR 31, 1986 

CONTROL NO BYE 52037 -67 

COpy OF COPI ES 

T9P SECRET 
C02428567 

NRq APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 ~GUST 2015 

TOP SeCftET 

.. Additional imagery of typical targets for Crisis Indications and 

strike Effectiveness Assessment is being obtained for detailed 

analysis by the National Photographic Interpreta~ion Center. High 

quality imagery is being collected (from an aircraft-borne sensor) at 

various look and depression angles and then degraded through labora-

- tory processing to simulate several variations in signal-to-noise ratio, 

-

; 

.. 

-

dynamiC range, and resolution. The effect of such variations on the 

utility and interpretability of the imagery will be examined by NPIC. 

This program of analysis and evaluation will continue through June 

1967. 

New SIGINT Payloads: A new SIGINT payload, DONKEY, will be 

flown in the Spring of 1967 to map the locations and frequencies of the 

Sovi communications links. In 

addition, this payload will provide some intercept of selected channels 

while within the main beam of the transmitter. The frequency r~nge 

of interest is from approximately 3450 to 3900 mcs. 

In the Fall of 1967, another payload, SQUARE TWENTY, is to be 

flown on the using a lO-foot parabolic dish. The 

purpose of this payload is to provide location and frequencie s of 

communications transmitters in the frequency 

range from approximately 1550 to 2000 mcs. 

42 

TO~ SECRIST 

Handle Via 

B YEMAN-TALENT-KEYHOLE 

Control Systems Only 
C02428567 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 WJGUST 2015 

TOP SECRET 

I 

J 

... 

-

, 

-

-

Both the DONKEY and SQUARE TWENTY missions are to 

provide information which can lead to a more comprehensive understanding of the disposition and traffic on the medium and high capacity 

DORIAN: Contracts for the approved Manned Orbiting Laboratory 

program through seven launchings were definitized with Eastman 

Kodak, General Electric, Douglas, and McDonnell an~ work is 

continuing On schedule in Phase II (hardware acquisition). Detailed 

engineering and test planning is in progress and configuration management procedures are well under way. Major specification reviews and 

approval are being conducted and the interfaces essentially have been 

defined. 

The reentry test of the Gemini heat shield, modified wi th a hatch 

for MOL application, was accomplished successfully in November as 

a verification of the design. 

Blanks for the 70-in. aperture optical subsystem have been 

delivered to Eastman Kodak and the production of flight-weight 

blanks is in progress. Drawings are complete for the optical development 

Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System 

43. 

Tep SECRl!l
aw ae

20 Mov 56 WBLIIT7L. "Sensitive Aspects" Roster

Air Devel: Center
a. Captain Ralph 8. Decker, Jr.
b. Fatllip J, Cross



“3 127L "Sensitive Aspects" Roster
wDSI WIR “

Fer your information, inclosed herevith is reviced copy of 1:3 127L
*Sonsitive Aspoota* Rostor. a

wratED
1 Incl FREDSRIC C. E. ODER ©
"S 1I7L "Sensitive Aspects” Lt Colonel, usar
Roster Assistert for WS 127L

Tochnic-1 Operations

Seeagees



r

20 Nov 56 WAT “Sensitive Aspects” Roster

L The following personnel are listed as requiring complete knowledge
of the “Sensitive Aspecte* of WS 1271, .

Western Devel Division

a. Major General Bernard A. Schriever
b. Brigadier General Osmond J, Ritland
Ge Colonel Charles H. Terme, Jr.
a. Colonel Harold W. Norton

@. Colonel Robert D. Bowers

£. Colonel William A, Sheppard

g- Lt Colonel J. B. Hudson

he Lt Colonel Frederic C, E. Oder

a
- Lt Colonel Quenten A. Riepe

1. Major Raymond E. Zelenka

B. Geptadn 2 S. Coulbeagh
a janes

O Pedant am O- Trostschel
Pe utenant John C, Herther

Ballistic Missile Office (AMC)

&. Brigadier General B. I. Funk
b. Colonel H. 7. Morris

CS. Major R, G. Rowland

ad. Mr. Bugene C, Silberman

Air Force Cambridge Research Center

4 ion

a. Colonel J. G.
be Lt Colonel George P. Jones
Cc. Mr. Milton Greenberg
Air Center ’
a. Brigidier General Victor H. Haugen
be Mr. Leroy Bell

Rome Air Development Center

& Major General S, P, Wright
>. Colonel Janes W, Anderson, Jr.
Lt Colonel Milton E. Wills
a Major Harold F, Wienderg *

@. Mr. Milton R, Rosenberg .
£. Mr. Richard L, Libby



a
b
Se

Colonel Clifford B, Cole
Major Harold R. Meadows
Mr. John H, Melachlin