alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of SK Telecom Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                      |  |                         |  |  |  | 
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  |  |  | 
|Dated: April 30, 2012 |  | /s/ Seung Yun Ahn      
|                      |  | Seung Yun Ahn          
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# CE2004084EN.01068401.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/684 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/684

---

(2004/C 84 E/0770)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0846/04

by Monica Frassoni (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(19 March 2004)

Subject:   Communitarisation of Article 2 of the Schengen Convention

Subject:

According to the Commission's Scoreboard to review progress on the creation of an area of ‘freedom, security and justice’ in the European Union, a legislative proposal was to have been submitted by the end of 2001 with a view to Communitarisation of Article 2 of the Schengen Convention (safeguard clause allowing the temporary reintroduction of border controls). More than two years after the expiry of the deadline, Parliament still has not had any proposal of this kind referred to it.

In the meantime, Member States have systematically used — and abused — this safeguard clause at the time of European summits or other international meetings such as the G8 summit in Genoa in 2001. This demonstrates — if proof were called for — the need for a Community approach to this question.

What are the reasons for the delay?

Will the Commission submit a proposal for Communitarising Article 2 of the Schengen Convention, and when will it do so?

Can the Commission already indicate the general outlines of such a proposal?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(13 April 2004)

(13 April 2004)

Despite the delay, the Commission is still convinced that Article 2 of the Schengen Convention should be communitarised. For that reason, it announced in the most recent biannual update of its scoreboard to review progress in creating an area of freedom, security and justice in the European Union that it would incorporate such a procedure in the proposal for a regulation on the recasting of the common manual which will be presented before the end of the first half of 2004 (1).

1

Preparatory work on this proposal with a view to drawing up a code on borders is not yet complete. The Commission is, therefore, unable to give any details on the content of the proposal.

---

(1)  COM(2003) 812 final.

1

---
.,; 

REF ID:A58971 -.p SECRET FROTI I 9 

USCIB: 14 .ll/7 

10 May 1954 

fill"' SESffi!l'f PR0'fff 

'· MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

Reference: USCIB 14.11/.3 dated 26 April 1954. 

1. Paragraph 2a. of the reference reports the USCIB decision that 

an informal approach on this matter be ma.de by the Director, National 

Security Agency to the Director, GCHQ through SUSLO, London. 

2. Enclosed for information is a copy of the message to SUSID, 

London which implements the above decision. 

Enclosure 

NSA Msg ¢31657Z dtd.3 May 1954. 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

USCIB: 14.ll/7 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-05-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 

TeP SECRET FROTH 

24 
wr ~ lA.(~8.,971 sECT rl\v 1 ri e 

FROM: DmECTOR, NSA 

TO : SUSLO, LONDON 

DTG : ¢31657z MAY 54 

(Signed) 

P. J. KARL, LCDR, USN 

P. J. KARL, LCDR, USN 

NSA-12 60548 

3 MAY 54 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

TOP SECRET FROTH 

(Signed) 

JOHN J. DAVIS, COLONEL, ARTY 

CHIEF, P/P 

Enclosure with USCIB 14.11/7 dtd 10 May 1954. 

TOP SECRET FROTI I
MORGAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                        (Dollars In Thousands Except Per Unit Amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Year Ended December 31,
                                                           -------------------------------------------
                                                                2006           2005           2004
                                                           ------------    ------------   ------------
<S>                                                         <C>             <C>            <C>
Weighted average number of limited partners' units on
   which limited partners' net income per unit is based:
Basic...................................................    224,585,424     212,197,302    196,955,618
Add: Incremental units under common unit option plan and
   under contracts to issue units depending on the market
   price of the units at a future date..................        328,752         231,451         82,696
                                                           ------------    ------------   ------------
Assuming dilution.......................................    224,914,176     212,428,753    197,038,314
                                                           ============    ============   ============


Calculation of Limited Partners' interest in Net Income:
Net Income..............................................   $    972,143    $    812,227   $    831,578
Less:  General Partner's interest in Net Income.........       (512,967)       (477,300)      (395,092)
                                                           ------------    ------------   ------------
Limited Partners' interest in Net Income................   $    459,176    $    334,927   $    436,486
                                                           ============    ============   ============


Limited Partners' Net Income per unit:
Basic...................................................   $       2.04    $       1.58   $       2.22
Diluted.................................................   $       2.04    $       1.58   $       2.22

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.3



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the use of our report dated February 28, 1998, with respect to the
financial statements of AnswerSoft, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of Davox Corporation.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
of Davox Corporation on Form S-8 (file Nos. 33-89582, 333-07003, 333-16209, 333-
30727 and 333-52551) of our report dated February 28, 1998, with respect to the
financial statements of AnswerSoft, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of Davox Corporation.



                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Dallas, Texas
March 3, 1999
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 15


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

We are aware that our report dated March 16, 1998 on our reviews of interim
financial information of HEI, Inc. (the Company) for the three- and six-month
periods ended February 28, 1998 and March 1, 1997, and included in the Company's
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended February 28, 1998, is incorporated by
reference in the Company's registration statements on Form S-8 (Registration
Nos. 33-33322, 33-46928 and 33-46929). Pursuant to Rule 436 (c), under the
Securities Act of 1993, this report should not be considered a part of the
registration statements prepared or certified by us within the meaning of
Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 31, 1998
# CE2004084EN.01032303.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/323 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/323

---

(2004/C 84 E/0375)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0166/04

by Christopher Heaton-Harris (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(29 January 2004)

Subject:   Commission's accounting systems

Subject:

I understand the Internal Audit Service, in a report entitled ‘IAS Review of the Commission's Accounting Framework — Final Report’ dated 15 April 2003, made a number of recommendations to the Commission regarding the accounting systems.

Could the Commission confirm that it has revised the summary tables for the intangible and tangible assets to make them clearer and more readable?

---
REF ID:A65983 ---M -- ('A"'·'S:-•j'Fl\ITI 

··,' ·~, , >I, • ·~ St..A-Cr- A~-

Ojfice Memorandum • UNITED sTATEfGoVERNMENT 

)}FSA 

TO : OOT 

FROM : ..$ 1 

SUBJECT: s c. A (;... J ~ fe ........ . 

I O~vf-~f'~~~ ~ 

~~-----~~~~~A....~ 

u.1JJ.. ;t,l,. If C~~ ~~ ;· .hD-4-' ...........,. ~ ~. J;C ~ ~ ~ LC.DR HJ.L.) .,,.,:.:a 

a... ~ ~ 1d- D,,,... SL~ J ......,.f,.,,. L.(. + -t-

~ ot- ~ ~ ~ ~ '_,±:.. eclassified and approved for release by 

. (/ SA on 04-15-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352 

CONFf.Df'f.NTIAL 

.. ' !IC~~
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 37 (Wednesday, February 25, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10164-10165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03869]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub., L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:
    Name: Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure (25150).
    Date and Time:
    April 22, 2015; 09:00 a.m.-5:30 p.m.
    April 23, 2015; 8:30 a.m.-1:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, 
VA 22230, Room 1235.
    Type of Meeting: OPEN.
    Contact Person: Mark Suskin, CISE, Division of Advanced 
Cyberinfrastructure, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Suite 1145, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: 703-292-8970.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To advise NSF on the impact of its policies, 
programs and activities in the ACI community. To provide advice to the 
Director/NSF on issues related to long-range planning.

[[Page 10165]]

    Agenda: Updates on NSF wide ACI activities.

    Dated: February 19, 2015.
Suzanne Plimpton,
Acting, Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-03869 Filed 2-24-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1735 

To modernize the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 9, 2015 

Mr. NELSON (for himself, Mr. SCHUMER, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. 

MURPHY, and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To modernize the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Undetectable Firearms 

5 Modernization Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODERNIZATION OF THE PROHIBITION ON 

7 UNDETECTABLE FIREARMS. 

8 Section 922(p) of title 18, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 

10 (1) in paragraph (1)— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1735 IS

1 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking 

2 ‘‘grips, stocks, and magazines’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘all parts other than a major component’’; and 

4 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking 

5 ‘‘when subjected to inspection by the types of x6 ray machines commonly used at airports, does 

7 not generate’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘if 

8 subjected to inspection by the types of detection 

9 devices commonly used at airports for security 

10 screening, would not generate’’; 

11 (2) in paragraph (2)— 

12 (A) by striking subparagraph (B) and in13 serting the following: 

14 ‘‘(B) the term ‘major component’, with respect 

15 to a firearm— 

16 ‘‘(i) means the slide or cylinder or the 

17 frame or receiver of the firearm; and 

18 ‘‘(ii) in the case of a rifle or shotgun, in19 cludes the barrel of the firearm; and’’; and 

20 (B) by striking subparagraph (C) and all 

21 that follows through the end of the undesig22 nated matter following subparagraph (C) and 

23 inserting the following: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1735 IS

1 ‘‘(C) the term ‘Security Exemplar’ means an 

2 object, to be fabricated at the direction of the Attor3 ney General, that is— 

4 ‘‘(i) constructed of 3.7 ounces of material 

5 type 17–4 PH stainless steel in a shape resem6 bling a handgun; and 

7 ‘‘(ii) suitable for testing and calibrating 

8 metal detectors.’’; 

9 (3) in paragraph (3)— 

10 (A) in the first sentence, by inserting 

11 ‘‘, including a prototype,’’ after ‘‘of a fire12 arm’’; and 

13 (B) by striking the second sentence; 

14 and 

15 (4) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘shall not 

16 apply to any firearm which’’ and all that follows and 

17 inserting the following: ‘‘shall not apply to— 

18 ‘‘(A) any firearm received by, in the possession 

19 of, or under the control of the United States; or 

20 ‘‘(B) the manufacture, importation, possession, 

21 transfer, receipt, shipment, or delivery of a firearm 

22 by a licensed manufacturer or licensed importer pur23 suant to a contract with the United States.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the periodic report of Dawson Geophysical Company (the
"Company") Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christina W. Hagan, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d);
          and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: January 28, 2003                  /s/ Christina W. Hagan
                                         ----------------------------
                                         Vice President and Chief
                                         Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 38 (Thursday, February 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10455-10456]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03933]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: International Trade Administration.
    Title: Export Trade Certificate of Review.
    OMB Control Number: 0625-0125.
    Form Number(s): ITA-4093P.
    Type of Request: Regular Submission.
    Number of Respondents: 9.
    Average Hours per Response: 32 hours (application); 2 hours (annual 
report).
    Burden Hours: 440 hours.
    Needs and Uses: The collection of information is necessary for both 
the Departments of Commerce and Justice to conduct an analysis, in 
order to determine whether the applicant and its members are eligible 
to receive the protection of an Export Trade Certificate of Review and 
whether the applicant's proposed export-related conduct meets the 
standards in Section 303(a) of the Act. The collection of information 
constitutes the essential basis of the statutory determinations to be 
made by the Secretary of Commerce and the Attorney General.
    Affected Public: Business or other for profit organizations; not-
for-profit institutions, and state, local or tribal government.
    Frequency: Application for an Export Trade Certificate of Review is 
voluntary and submission of an application form is required once each 
time an entity of the affected public applies for an new or amended 
Export Trade Certificate of Review. Completion of an annual report is 
required one time per year from existing Certificate holders.

[[Page 10456]]

    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    This information collection request may be viewed at reginfo.gov. 
Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce collections 
currently under review by OMB.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#46090f1407191533242b2f35352f292806292b246823293668212930"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0b4442594a54587e69666278786264654b646669256e647b256c647d">[email protected]</span></a> or fax to (202) 395-5806.

    Dated: February 20, 2015.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-03933 Filed 2-25-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference in the following Registration
Statements   of  our  report  dated  February  9,  2001,  with  respect  to  the
consolidated  financial  statements  of  Exigent   International,  Inc. included
in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.

Registration
Statement
Number            Description
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

333-38807                  Incentive Stock Option Plan 1Q
333-29875                  Incentive Stock Option Plan 2Q
333-43657                  Incentive Stock Option Plan 3Q
333-50625                  Incentive Stock Option Plan 4Q
333-49087                  Independent Director Stock Option Plan 5NQ
333-53323                  Stock Option Plan 6NQ
333-75469                  Omnibus Stock Option and Incentive Plan
333-75447                  Employee Stock Purchase Plan



Jacksonville, Florida            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
March 23, 2001
# CE2004084EN.01062801.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/628 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/628

---

(2004/C 84 E/0705)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0557/04

by Proinsias De Rossa (PSE) to the Commission

(26 February 2004)

Subject:   Directive on social protection on new forms of employment

Subject:

What action has the Commission taken in response to paragraph 7(f) of the European Parliament's resolution (P5_TA(2003)0369) of 3 September 2003 on implementing the social policy agenda which urged the Commission to draft a Directive on social protection for new forms of employment?

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,309,889
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,309,889
<PP&E>                                       3,468,313
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,778,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          234,461
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,543,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,778,202
<SALES>                                        162,915
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               194,885
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                65,009
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                129,876
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            129,876
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   129,876
<EPS-BASIC>                                      10.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    10.78


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Urquidez, Appellant.

[773 NYS2d 567]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Boklan, J.), rendered November 2, 2001, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant’s contention that the fingerprint evidence was inadequate to connect him to the crimes for which he *801was convicted. Fingerprint evidence, although circumstantial in nature, is sufficient proof if it leads to a conclusion of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and excludes every reasonable hypothesis of innocence *(see People v Hirsch,*280 AD2d 612 [2001]; *People v Murray,*168 AD2d 573 [1990]). The record established that the defendant’s fingerprint was found on the bottom of a cigar box at the crime scene, and that the cigar box was kept in an area inaccessible to the public. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt *(see People v Harden, 174*AD2d 691 [1991]; *People v Vasquez,*131 AD2d 523 [1987]; *People v DiBlasi,*130 AD2d 679 [1987]; *People v Mercado, 117*AD2d 627 [1986]). Santucci, J.P., Florio, Schmidt and Mastro, JJ., concur.