alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

(2004/C 88 E/0531)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0627/04

by María Sornosa Martínez (PSE) to the Commission

(3 March 2004)

Subject:   Failure to comply with Community legislation during border veterinary checks in Spain

The Subdirectorate-General for External and Veterinary Health (SGSEV) of the Spanish Ministry of Health and Consumer Affairs has issued instructions (1) ordering official veterinarians at border inspection posts to allow the entry of consignments as direct landings of fishery products when they do not fulfil that condition under current Community rules, and even exempting certain products from compulsory veterinary checks (and, consequently, from the corresponding charges) when these rules contain no provision for doing so. The SGSEV is also allowing the captains of fishing vessels, an interested party in the trade transaction, to sign not just a simple declaration but also health certificates on behalf of the competent authority in the country of origin.

Bearing in mind the provisions of Directive 97/78/EC (2) laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries, Directive 91/493/EEC (3) laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products, Decision 93/13/EEC (4) (updated and extended by Regulation (EC) No 136/2004 (5)) laying down the procedures for veterinary checks at Community border inspection posts on products from third countries and Regulation (EC) No 1093/94 (6) setting the terms under which fishing vessels of a third country may land directly and market their catches at Community ports:

----

(1)  Instructions from the Subdirectorate-General for External and Veterinary Health dated 1 October 2003 concerning documentary checks on direct landings of fishery products.

(2)OJ L 24, 30.1.1998, p. 9.

(3)OJ L 298, 24.9.1991, p. 15.

(4)OJ L 9, 15.1.1993, p. 33.

(5)OJ L 21, 28.1.2004, p. 11.

(6)OJ L 121, 12.5.1994, p. 3.

----
EXHIBIT 99.2

       Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
         Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Joy C. Hartman, the Chief Financial Officer of Science Dynamics
Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: November 13, 2002



                                       /s/Joy C. Hartman
                                       -----------------
                                       Name: Joy C. Hartman
                                       Title: Chief Financial Officer
# CE2004088EN.01052301.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/523 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/523

---

(2004/C 88 E/0536)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0728/04

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 March 2004)

Subject:   Ansaldo-Breda: possible monitoring of EU funding

Subject:

At the meeting last week in Brussels involving trade union delegations and workers from Ansaldo-Breda, it emerged that the company has benefited from assistance supporting production activities in depressed areas of Italy, as provided for in Italian Law No 488/92, in the form of EU cofinancing. Specifically, funding has been made available for work on replacing the company's roof with eternit (asbestos lumber), so as to bring the workplace up to European standards in terms of safeguarding and protecting workers.

However, it would not appear that funding was requested to provide environmental protection for the surrounding area, despite the presence of an important acquifer in the vicinity of the establishment.

Can the Commission answer the following:

| 1. | In view of the above, can the Commission state whether Ansaldo-Breda has received funding and, if so, what kind? |
| --- | --- |

1.

In view of the above, can the Commission state whether Ansaldo-Breda has received funding and, if so, what kind?

| 2. | What instruments can be adopted to check whether any funding awarded to Ansaldo-Breda has actually been used? |
| --- | --- |

2.

What instruments can be adopted to check whether any funding awarded to Ansaldo-Breda has actually been used?

Supplementary answer givcn by Mr Barrot on behalf of the Commission

(22 June 2004)

(22 June 2004)

In the 1994-1999 and 2000-2006 programming periods the European Regional Development Fund has part-financed action under Italian Law 488/92 to strengthen the industrial fabric of eligible areas.

The action part-financed includes investments by the enterprises mentioned by the Honourable Member in restructuring, modernisation and enlargement of industrial premises in the regions of Apulia, Basilicata, Campania and Sicily. A table giving the detailed information sent by the Italian authorities will be sent direct to the Honourable Member and to Parliament's secretariat.

Ansaldo Breda is also participating in four research projects under the 5th Research and Technological Development Framework Programme (assistance granted EUR 867 617) and in two research projects under the 6th Framework Programme (assistance granted EUR 822 115).

Provision of that assistance falls under the authority of the Italian Government, which as managing authority for the programme (Ministry for Production Activities) is responsible for selecting and monitoring the individual projects. For more detailed information the Honourable Member should therefore approach the national authorities.

Where Community measures with decentralised management are concerned, the Commission normally confines itself to system checks and on-the-spot sample checks.

---
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	General Timothy D. Haugh
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint bio">
    <div class="header">
        

        

        
        

        
        <span class="left"><img src="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/Templates/DOD2%20-%20Biography/bio-print-left.gif" style="border-width:0px;" /></span>
        

        

        

        
        <span class="right"><img src="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/Templates/DOD2%20-%20Biography/bio-print-right.gif" style="border-width:0px;" /></span>
        
        
        
        

        <h1 class="title">General Timothy D. Haugh</h1>
        <h3 class="subtitle">Commander, U.S. Cyber Command; Director, National Security Agency/Chief, Central Security Service</h3>
        <h3 class="subtitle"></h3>
        <h3 class="subtitle"></h3>
    </div>
    <div>
        
        <div class="main-image">
            
<div class="bio-gallery gallery">
    
    <div class="img-wrapper">
        <img class="img-responsive" src="https://media.defense.gov/2024/Feb/02/2003387296/400/400/0/240202-D-IM742-2024.JPG" alt="General Timothy D. Haugh, Commander, U.S. Cyber Command; Director, National Security Agency; Chief, Central Security Service."/>
        
    </div>
    
</div>



        </div>
        
    </div>
    <div>
        <p>General Timothy D. Haugh is 4th Commander, U.S. Cyber Command and 19th Director, National Security Agency/Chief, Central Security Service at Fort George G. Meade, Maryland.<br />
<br />
A native of Hughesville, Pennsylvania, General Haugh earned his commission in 1991 as a distinguished graduate of the ROTC program at Lehigh University.<br />
<br />
General Haugh has commanded at the squadron, group, wing, numbered air force, and joint levels. He’s served on staffs at major command, agency and combatant command headquarters. His notable tours include Deputy Commander of Joint Task Force Ares, Commander of Cyber National Mission Force, Commander of Sixteenth Air Force, and Deputy Commander of U.S. Cyber Command.<br />
<br />
In addition to earning his Bachelor of Arts in Russian Studies from Lehigh University, General Haugh holds Master of Science degrees from the Industrial College of the Armed Forces, the Naval Postgraduate School, and Southern Methodist University.<br />
<br />
General Haugh and his spouse, Mrs. Sherie Haugh, have been married for more than 31 years, and have one son, one daughter, and one daughter in law.</p>

    </div>
</div>
    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of MRV Communications, Inc. ("MRV") on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on October 7, 2009, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



Date: October 7, 2009

/s/ NOAM LOTAN Noam Lotan Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks
### TEX A S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-05-00568- CV Of f ic e Le as ingAdv iso r s, Inc . , App e lla nt

v. Texas. Net , Inc. , Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COU NTY, 201ST JUDICIAL DISTRI CT NO. GN403892 , HONO RABLE PETER M. LOWRY, JUDGE PRESIDING

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I NI O N Ap pe lla nt Of fi c e L e a sin g A dv iso r s, In c . ha s f ile d a mot ion to d ism iss thea

pp e a l. We gr ant the motion and dismiss the appe al. T ex. R. App. P . 42. 1(a) .

__________________________________________ D avid P ur year , Justice B efor e C hief Justice L aw, Justices B . A. S mith and P ur year D ismiss ed on Appe llant’s M otion F iled: N ovember 7, 2005
NO. 07-11-00072-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D APRIL 14, 2011

JEREMY JAY BROCK, APPELLANT

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

FROM THE 222ND DISTRICT CO URT OF DEAF SMITH COUNTY; NO. CR-2006D-049; HONORABLE ROLAND D. SAUL, JUDGE

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Jeremy Jay Brock attempts to appeal the trial court’s denial of his request for appointment of counsel in a proceeding for post-conviction DNA testing under Chapter 64 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. 1 Finding we lack appellate jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal.

The record in this case has not been file d but the clerk of the trial court submitted a copy of appellant’s notice of appeal and the trial cour t’s order denying appellant’s request for appointment of counsel. We notified appellant by letter of a possible

1 Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. ar ts. 64.01-64.05 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010).2 jurisdictional defect and afforded him more than ten days to supply documents or matters he deemed necessary for determination of our jurisdiction. Appellant did not respond to our notice letter. We have considered our jurisdiction.

According to appellant’s notice of appeal he seeks our review of the trial court’s order denying his “request for appointment of counsel pursuant to article 64, Code of Criminal Procedure, heretofor e rendered against him . . . [on] January 21, 2011.” On January 21, the trial court si gned an order reciting that it had considered appellant’s request for appointment of c ounsel in a Chapter 64 proc eeding along with appellant’s declaration of inability to pay costs. The court found no reasonable grounds for a motion under Chapter 64, 2 and denied appellant’s request for appointment of counsel.

“The right to appeal is conferred by the legislature, and gen erally a party may appeal only that which the legi slature has authorized.” Vargas v. State, 109 S.W.3d 26, 29 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 2003, no pet). Thus unless jurisdiction is expressly granted by law, an appellate court does not have jurisdic tion to review orders made during the course of a case before entry of a final order. Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d. 792, 794 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991). The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has held that an order denying appointed counsel under article 64.01(c) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not an immediately appealable order. Gutierrez v. State, 307 S.W.3d 318, 319 (Tex.Crim.App. 2010). Rather, the order is appealable “if and when” the motion for forensic DNA testing is denied. Id. at 323.

2 Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 64. 01(c) (West Supp. 2010) (appointment of counsel requires court find reasonable gr ounds for filing motion under Chapter 64).3 Because appellant seeks re view of an interlocutory or der over which appellate courts have not been given jurisdiction, we dism iss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

James T. Campbell Justice

Do not publish.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 16, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, March 16, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16D0276. ROBERT J. DAVIS v. CHARLES JEFFREY LIIPFERT et al. . Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: NONE
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 38 (Thursday, February 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 10462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04028]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


US Air Force Exclusive Patent License

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, Air Force Research Laboratory 
Information Directorate, Rome, New York.

ACTION: Notice of Intent to Issue an Exclusive Patent License.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of part 404 of Title 37, Code of 
Federal Regulations, which implements Public Law 96-517, as amended, 
the Department of the Air Force announces its intention to grant Lilo, 
LLC, a corporation of New York, having a place of business at 106 
Genesee St., Utica, New York 13413, an exclusive license in any right, 
title and interest the United States Air Force has in: In U.S. Patent 
No. 8,317,058 entitled ``Bicyclists' Water Bottle with Bottom Drinking 
Valve'', issued on November 27th, 2012, U.S. Design Patent No. D588,856 
issued on March 24th, 2009, and U.S. Design Patent D583,626 issued on 
December 20th, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: An exclusive license for this patent 
will be granted unless a written objection is received within fifteen 
(15) days from the date of publication of this Notice. Written 
objections should be sent to: Air Force Research Laboratory, Office of 
the Staff Judge Advocate, AFRL/RIJ, 26 Electronic Parkway, Rome, New 
York 13441-4514. Telephone: (315) 330-2087; Facsimile (315) 330-7583.

Henry Williams,
Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-04028 Filed 2-25-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-P
Exhibit23.1

Consent of Registered Independent Public AccountingFirm

The Board of Directors and StockholdersRevlon,Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statement on Form S-8 of Revlon, Inc. of our report datedMarch 9, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets ofRevlon, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and therelated statements of operations, stockholders' deficiency andcomprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in thethree-year period ended December 31, 2004 and the related financialstatement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2004annual report on Form 10-K of Revlon,Inc.

    KPMG LLPNew York, NewYorkMarch 10, 2005

----
f..,_ __ _:. __________ ~~~~~.fm1c~M~•o~Nmw~a~"------~ -..-.-l--, 

DISPOSITION FORM 

FILE NO I SUBJECT O'n1. Prascmtat.tm bJ' C.en. Canine on 

the Cmteaplatod Uove I 

TO CIJ5Sfo of otficm FROM COMMENT NO 1 

and statt D1mione 

Refermaa AGDe D/F ct 6 Dao S.18 sc.me 6ubc1Efct as abau\1 

The metlrllfJ with tm r.4.Jieotor as mot forth in pajL"eo .2 at the :rote~ ban 

~ telllPOJ"taiJ..v postpamd. ?Jea dates Md tims for tlwi as&tiqtJ will bG ~d at a later datso All other intornat..1.on eon~d 1f1 the re.f~mce ~aiwl ~edo 

Fon 'lHE DDU<DTORz '\ 
• REF ID:A723BB 

DISPOSITION FORM 

FILE NO J SUBJECT 

t oral Presentation bJ' Geno Canine on t.he ConteqUted .Jove 

and Stat.t' Divisions 

FROM II DATE Dae 19SJ. COMMENT NO 1 

lo l'be DiNctor dBoiree to .caka an oral preeentation to AFSA personnel tiho 

are .ixore or less on a supeniaor,y lewl.o ~ preoento.t1on u1U be pr.Wa.r:Uy for the 

benefit of c1vll.1a.n parsonnel and to thoee m1lita:l7 prsonnel mo are in a direct 

eupervisOl'J' capac1t7 o 

2. Armngecrmte haY9 boen 148de tor one talk at AILS and tor ane Uk at llAVSmsTA 

es tollaasr 

Date and T1ma • ~ 10 Decenher I Sl at 1330 

Plaoe - Station !baa.tie 

'lbeatre capac1.t7 - 508 people 

'1UOtas fOf' AFSA aotivitiea located at AHSI 

AFSA-02 - 430 

AFSA-03 - 3S 

AFSA-Ot. - S 

AFSA-13 - 15 

APSA-15 - 19 ~A-16- l 

Ar.'A-17 - 3 

Tot.al ~ 

IJAVS!iSTA 

Date and Tica - ...oridfl¥ 10 Decer.bar 151 at 1530 

Place - station cateterla 

catetel'ia Capncit.7- Appl"OJd.mat.eJ.T 450 people 

Quotas tor AFSA aotivitiea located at HAVSFJ:STA1 

AFSA Dil"eotcn.te • 2 

AFSA-OO'l-OOX - 2 

AFSA-OOF - lO 

AFSA•U - 2 

AFSA-12 • 4 

AFSA-14 - 6 

AF'"'A-15 • 2 

AFSA-16 - 12 

AFSA-1? Inc. ~ .G. t. SIGPB-3 • 4IJ 

AFSA-G2 - :t.o 

/i¥f A-<>3 - 90 

/IFS,4...Q4 - 250 

AFSA-()S .. 10 

Total l;j) 

DD FORM 9 6 REPLACES l'IME FORM 96 1 OCT 48 WHICH MAY BE USED I FEB 50 

16-04801-8 U 8 GOYERNMEJIT PRINTING OFPIC! 
TOa All Cldafe of ottioea 

and StalK 1li.'Visicm8 

REF ID:A723BB a 

SUBJEXJTa Onl Presentation b7 Gino Cenine9 

on the Cont.eq>l ated Mow 

------~------~------------~---~----------~ 3o 1'he Chiefs ct attioea and Statt DiT181anB 1d.ll solCDOt pencmnel int.he i'il~ irldioated above ond will !nsuro their arrival at eaoh looat.1.an on tim.eo 

~. ~ cleared and 1.titel".lm cleared peraonn&l. wlll attend. AFSA-16 will 

be responsible tor cheald.ng badaea at each location. 

5o '!'he talk will be of apprcxicatelJ' Z> z:d.mtell!I duraUono 

6ct Smoking 1'11J.l. be prohibited in Uoth buildinslo 

F(I( 'i'JE DIRECTOIU 

Cop7 to: PCISt Coa:aandar1 AffS 

CO, llAVSECSTA
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1235/2006

of 16 August 2006         

setting, for the 2006/2007 marketing year, the amount of aid for the cultivation of grapes intended for the production of certain varieties of dried grapes and of aid for replanting vineyards affected by phylloxera

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the markets in processed fruit and vegetable products (1), and in particular Article 7(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   For the 2006/07 marketing year the cultivation aid referred to in Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 shall be:

2.   For the 2006/07 marketing year the replanting aid referred to in Article 7(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 shall be EUR 3 917 per hectare.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 August 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 29. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 386/2004 (OJ L 64, 2.3.2004, p. 25).

(2)OJ L 192, 24.7.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1880/2001 (OJ L 258, 27.9.2001, p. 14).

----
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 38 (Thursday, February 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 10566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04021]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

February 23, 2015.
    The Department of the Treasury will submit the following 
information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for review and clearance in accordance with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13, on or after the date of 
publication of this notice.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before March 30, 2015 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Send comments regarding the burden estimate, or any other 
aspect of the information collection, including suggestions for 
reducing the burden, to (1) Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for 
Treasury, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 
20503, or email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5f10160d1e000c2a3d32362c2c3630311f10121d711a100f71383029"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="96d9dfc4d7c9c5e3f4fbffe5e5fff9f8d6d9dbd4b8d3d9c6b8f1f9e0">[email protected]</span></a> and (2) Treasury PRA 
Clearance Officer, 1750 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Suite 8140, Washington, 
DC 20220, or email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6434362524101601051711161d4a030b12"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1343415253676176726066616a3d747c65">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the submission(s) may be 
obtained by calling (202) 927-5331, email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#edbdbfacad999f888c9e989f94c38a829b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="91c1c3d0d1e5e3f4f0e2e4e3e8bff6fee7">[email protected]</span></a>, or the 
entire information collection request may be found at www.reginfo.gov.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-2229.
    Type of Review: Extension without change of a currently approved 
collection.
    Title: TD 9575--Summary of Benefits and Coverage and the Uniform 
Glossary.
    Abstract: This document contains regulations regarding disclosure 
of the summary of benefits and coverage and the uniform glossary for 
group health plans and health insurance coverage in the group and 
individual markets under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 
and implements the disclosure requirements to help plans and 
individuals better understand their health coverage, as well as other 
coverage options.
    Affected Public: Private Sector: Businesses or other for-profits; 
not-for-profit institutions.
    Estimated Annual Burden Hours: 649,500.

Dawn D. Wolfgang,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-04021 Filed 2-25-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
• 

USCIB: 29.19/25 

10 May 1955 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

MEMORANDW. FOR THE ME1'1:BERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: CCMINT Relations with 1 .... ___ ___, 

Reference: USCIB 29.19/23 dated 26 April 1955. 

In the abs.ence of objection to the reference, the USCIBEC 

recommendation contained therein is considered approved. 

USCIB: 29 .19/25 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-14-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

TOP SECRET 

24