alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
f8k101308ex10_advncsystem.htm


     

     

     

    Exhibit
10.1

     

     

    Plan
of Liquidation and Dissolution

     

    of

     

    Advanced Nurseries, Inc.


     

    This Plan
of Liquidation and Dissolution (the “Plan”) is for the purpose of effecting the
complete liquidation and dissolution of Advanced Nurseries, Inc., a Georgia
corporation (the “Company”).

    


    I. ADOPTION OF THE PLAN. The
board of directors (the “Board”) and shareholders of the Company has adopted
this Plan on October 13, 2008.

    


    II. LIQUIDATION OF ASSETS. The
Company shall determine whether and when to sell, exchange, transfer, lease,
license or otherwise dispose of all of its remaining property and assets,
including the Company’s intangible assets, in one or more transactions upon such
terms and conditions as the Board, in its absolute discretion, deems expedient
and in the best interests of the Company and the shareholders. The Company will
not be required to obtain appraisals or other third party opinions as to the
value of its properties and assets in connection with the liquidation. As part
of the liquidation of its property and assets, the Company shall collect, or
make provision for the collection of, all accounts receivable, debts and claims
owing to the Company. In connection with and for the purpose of implementing and
assuring completion of this Plan, the Company may, in the absolute discretion of
the Board, pay any brokerage, agency, professional and other fees and expenses
of persons rendering services to the Company in connection with the collection,
sale, exchange or other disposition of the Company’s property and assets and the
implementation of this Plan.

    


    III. PAYMENT OF DEBTS. Prior
to making any distributions to the shareholders, the Company shall pay, or as
determined by the Board, make reasonable provision to pay, all claims and
obligations of the Company.

    


    IV. DISTRIBUTIONS TO
SHAREHOLDERS. Following the payment or the provision for the payment of
the Company’s claims and obligations as provided above, the Company shall
distribute pro rata to the shareholders all remaining assets, including the cash
proceeds of any sale, exchange or disposition. The Company shall distribute
substantially all of its net assets to shareholders in accordance with their
respective interests within one year after the date of the closing of the sale
or other disposition of all or substantially all of its property and
assets.

    


    V. POWERS OF BOARD AND
OFFICERS. The Board may interpret the provisions of this Plan, make,
execute and deliver such other agreements, conveyances, assignments, transfers,
certificates and other documents and take such other action as the Board and the
officers of the Company deem necessary or desirable in order to carry out the
provisions of this Plan. Prior to the filing of a certificate of dissolution,
the Board shall have full authority to abandon and revoke the dissolution as the
Board deems appropriate without further shareholder action.
# CE2004084EN.01029802.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/298 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/298

---

(2004/C 84 E/0346)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0043/04

by Elspeth Attwooll (ELDR) to the Commission

(20 January 2004)

Subject:   Trade impact of the euro

Subject:

In the answer to Written Question E-1883/03 (1) by Chris Huhne, Commissioner Solbes made a number of comments regarding the trade impact of the euro. Is the Commission now able to provide any additional information based on economic developments over the last six months?

1

(Original Question by Chris Huhne: Will the Commission summarise the conclusions of any major studies, including its own, on the impact of the euro on trade within the euro-area? Will it estimate the size of any increase in trade as a result of the introduction of the euro?)

Answer given by Mr Solbes Mira on behalf of the Commission

(23 February 2004)

(23 February 2004)

In its reply to Written Question E-1883/03 by the Honourable Member Mr Huhne (2), the Commission gave an overview of the results of several academic studies assessing the euro's impact on trade within the euro-area. In the Quarterly Report on the Euro Area published on 30 September 2003, the Commission estimates, using trade data for the first quarter of 1991 to the fourth quarter of 2002, an effect of between 7 % and 18 %. The Commission, therefore, concludes that the euro has already had a sizeable impact on intra-euro area trade flows and that this effect could increase further.

2

Apart from the studies mentioned in the answer to the Written Question E-1883/03, it could be noted that in addition, an Economic and Monetary Union (EMU)-effect has also been established in studies on trade flows to and from individual Member States.

The Commission is not aware of any recent studies in this field using more recent trade data than the studies mentioned in the answer to the Written Question E-1883/03. However, it is unlikely that cyclical economic fluctuations in trade in the past six months would alter the basic findings of previous studies.

---

(1)  OJ C 58 E, 6.3.2004, p. 106.

1

(2)  OJ C 58 E, 6.3.2004, p. 106.

2

---
USCIB: 1,3.l/S 

(CORRECTED) 

Ifldffi!d!i YIA 00HIN'f 0111d1Ni!ib9 O!Ui¥ 

16 June 1955 

.SiGRmMEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Personnel Security Standards and Practices. 

Reference: USCIB 1.3.1/7, 18 May 1955. 

1. At its 116th meeting, on 10 June 1955, USCIB considered the 

ref e~ence and agreed: 

a. To establish a committee to study the personnel security 

standards and practices or the USCIB member agencies with a view to making 

recommendations and suggestions to USCIB with respect thereto. 

b. That the committee should be chaired by the FBI member, 

subject to FBI concurrence, with membership consisting or one representative appointed by each member or the Boa.rd, plus the Chairman or the USCIB 

Security Committee. 

c. That the committee would operate under terms of reference 

reflecting the Board's discussion at this meeting. Such terms of reference to be prepared by the Executive Secretary and circulated for approval 

by USCIB. 

2. In light of the members' discussion the following terms of reference for the committee are proposed: 

The committee established by USCIB at its 116th meeting shall 

study existing personnel security standards and practices of the USCIB 

member agencies with a view to ma.king recommendations and suggestions to 

USCIB. The committee study shall include: 

a. A review of the degree of close supervision, control, and 

inspection maintained by each member agency. 

b. A review of the provisions of USCIB Directive No. 5, in 

light of the Petersen case. 

c. A determination of the feasibility of establishing different 

levels of clearance for different categories of access. 

,3. It is requested that your views on paragraph 2, above, be 

entered on the attached vote sheet, which should be returned to this 

office by the close of business Tuesday, 21 June 1955. 

USCIB 

USCIB: 13.l 8 HANDI.E VIA COKlm' C~ ON!.¥ 

eclassified and a roved for release b NSA on 02-20-2014 ursuant to E. 0. 1352 

,..... '~ ,_ '
# CE2004088EN.01056001.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/560 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/560

---

(2004/C 88 E/0571)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1012/04

by Mario Borghezio (NI) to the Commission

(1 April 2004)

Subject:   Who is trying to block the investigations into fraud in Euroland?

Subject:

The blitz by the Belgian police, who raided the offices of Hans Martin Tillack, the Brussels correspondent of the German weekly Stern and author of a series of investigative articles on the Eurostat scandal and other delicate issues connected with corruption in the European Union institutions, is a serious and unprecedented act, which constitutes a violation of the principle of press freedom.

Does the Commission consider that this police initiative, probably prompted by OLAF and targeting not those guilty of corruption but someone reporting on corruption, shows that there are people at the highest levels of the European institutions who fear light being shed by serious investigative journalists on confidential and ignominious aspects of fraud and corruption in Euroland?

Answer given by Ms Schreyer on behalf of the Commission

(30 April 2004)

(30 April 2004)

On the basis of the information supplied by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), the Commission can tell the Honourable Member that in February 2004 the Office sent the relevant judicial authorities a file relating to suspected criminal offences.

Article 10(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 (1) provides for information about matters liable to result in criminal proceedings to be forwarded to the judicial authorities of the Member State concerned.

1

The national judicial authorities are then fully independent in their handling of the files sent.

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), OJ L 136, 31.5.1999.

1

---
Exhibit 32B CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of AutoInfo, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) on the date hereof (the Report), I, William
Wunderlich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: (1)          The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. A
signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request. Date:     August
29, 2008 /s/ William WunderlichWilliam WunderlichChief
 Financial Officer(Principal Financial
 Officer)
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Iteris, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, AbbasMohaddes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|        |   | /s/ ABBAS MOHADDES      |   |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |   | Abbas Mohaddes          |   |   |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
|   |   |                    |   |   |
|   |   | November 12, 2007       |   |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906, or any other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-25-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-23-1997
<CASH>                                          14,672
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,631
<ALLOWANCES>                                       193
<INVENTORY>                                     26,060
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,929
<PP&E>                                          55,352
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,805
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 105,542
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,867
<BONDS>                                         29,152
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,219
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,931
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   105,542
<SALES>                                         61,955
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,366
<CGS>                                           43,839
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,839
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,967
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,585
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,975
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,071
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,904
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,904
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        

</TABLE>
S. 1707 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen 

An Act 

To designate the Federal building located at 617 Walnut Street in Helena, Arkansas, 

as the ‘‘Jacob Trieber Federal Building, United States Post Office, and United 

States Court House’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JACOB TRIEBER FEDERAL BUILDING, UNITED STATES 

POST OFFICE, AND UNITED STATES COURT HOUSE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building located at 617 Walnut 

Street in Helena, Arkansas, shall be known and designated as 

the ‘‘Jacob Trieber Federal Building, United States Post Office, 

and United States Court House’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 

building referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a 

reference to the ‘‘Jacob Trieber Federal Building, United States 

Post Office, and United States Court House’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                         SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION - CEO

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Plains Resources Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
C. Flores, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. SS1350, as adopted pursuant to SS906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

To the best of my knowledge, after reasonable investigation:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Dated:  November 12, 2002.



                                            /s/ James C. Flores
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        James C. Flores
                                        Chief Executive Officer






                                        1
# CE2004088EN.01072401.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/724 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/724

---

(2004/C 88 E/0744)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1125/04

by Daniela Raschhofer (NI) to the Commission

(6 April 2004)

Subject:   EU programmes with Turkey – potential consequences of full membership

Subject:

Before the European Council takes a decision in December 2004 on the opening of accession negotiations with Turkey the following questions need to be answered:

| — | Under what programmes have EU funds already been made available to Turkey? |
| --- | --- |

—

Under what programmes have EU funds already been made available to Turkey?

| — | What level of funding has been made available? |
| --- | --- |

—

What level of funding has been made available?

| — | What financial consequences and/or obligations would the EU face in the event of Turkey becoming a full EU Member State? |
| --- | --- |

—

What financial consequences and/or obligations would the EU face in the event of Turkey becoming a full EU Member State?

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(29 April 2004)

(29 April 2004)

Until 2002, Turkey had received support under the MEDA programme and through two regulations to support the customs union (1) and economic and social development (2). The Council adopted on 17 December 2001 a regulation concerning pre-accession financial assistance for Turkey. This came into effect in January 2002 and continues to provide the legal base for our financial cooperation with Turkey.

1

2

Over the period 2000-2003 annual financial assistance to Turkey averaged EUR 177 million. In April 2003 agreement was reached between the Parliament, Council and Commission to include Turkey in the pre-accession heading of the financial perspectives and to provide substantially increased financial assistance for the period 2004-2006, amounting to EUR 1050 million over the three years (EUR 250 million in 2004, EUR 300 million in 2005 and EUR 500 million in 2006).

It should be recalled that the decision to be taken by the European Council in December 2004 will be based on an assessment of whether Turkey fulfils the Copenhagen political criteria. It is clear that the accession of a country with the size and population of Turkey would have a major impact on the EU, its policies and institutions. The concrete financial consequences and/or obligations for the EU would depend on the outcome of the negotiations.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 764/2000 of 10 April 2000 regarding the implementation of measures to intensify the EC-Turkey customs union, OJ L 94, 14.4.2000.

1

(2)  Regulation (EC) No 257/2001 of the Parliament and of the Council of 22 January 2001 regarding the implementation of measures to promote economic and social development in Turkey, OJ L 39, 9.2.2001.

2

---
# CE2004084EN.01091201.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/912 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/912

---

(2004/C 84 E/1008)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0912/04

by John Bowis (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(24 March 2004)

Subject:   Directive 2001/83/EC and Braille requirements

Subject:

Has the Commission fully assessed the implications and costs involved in the requirement that all medicine packaging must include Braille, as specified in Directive 2001/83/EC (1)?

1

Has the Commission considered other options such as:

| — | the provision, at point of sale, of clear self-adhesive Braille labels; |
| --- | --- |

—

the provision, at point of sale, of clear self-adhesive Braille labels;

| — | the availability, at point of sale, of leaflets printed in Braille, which may be retained in the home with the product in question; |
| --- | --- |

—

the availability, at point of sale, of leaflets printed in Braille, which may be retained in the home with the product in question;

| — | the provision, on demand, of reusable containers printed in Braille, in which a product may be kept? |
| --- | --- |

—

the provision, on demand, of reusable containers printed in Braille, in which a product may be kept?

Will the Commission consider convening a meeting of relevant stakeholders to ensure that this requirement is met in the most appropriate manner?

Answer given by Mr Liikanen on behalf of the Commission

(29 April 2004)

(29 April 2004)

The requirement to give information on a medicinal product in Braille is included in the revision of Directive 2001/83/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use as agreed by the Parliament and the Council (December 2003-March 2004).

During the discussions for the review of the above-mentioned Directive, Members of the Parliament pointed out the need to give basic information of medicinal products in Braille as well. As a consequence, the Council took on board the arguments that partially sighted or blind patients should be in a position to recognise the medicinal product.

The new provision (Article 56(a) of Directive 2001/83/EC) does not specify in which way the information must be given, if the information has to be on the container itself or for example on a ‘self-adhesive Braille label’. Different possibilities could be retained.

Different options could also be considered, in particular, concerning the availability at point of sale or by request to the distributor of a leaflet in Braille.

The Commission will discuss with the Member States in the context of the Pharmaceutical Committee how to implement this requirement in the most appropriate manner. Stakeholders will be consulted.

---

(1)  OJ L 311, 28.11.2001, p. 67.

1

---