alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
International Accreditation Service, Inc.CERTIFICATE OFACCREDITATION(see attached scope of accreditationfor field(s) of inspection, including type, range, methods or procedures)This accreditation certificate supersedes any IAS accreditation certificate bearing an earlier date. The certificate becomes invalid upon suspension,cancellation, or revocation ofaccreditation.See the IASAccreditation Listingson the web at www.iasonline.org for current accreditationinformation, or contact IAS directly at (562) 699-0541. Print Date: 09/23/2008Page 1 of 2This is to signify thatPROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC.2710 WEST 5THAVENUEEUGENE, OREGON 97402(Revised September 23, 2008)Product Certification Agency PCA-109Third-Party Certification Bodyhas met the International Accreditation Service (IAS) Accreditation Criteria for Product Certification Agencies AC370 and hasdemonstrated compliance with ISO/IEC Guide 65 (1996),General requirements for bodies operating product certificationsystems.Professional Service Industries, Inc., has been accredited, commencing June 1, 2008 provide third-party productcertification services listed inthe approved scope of accreditation.Patrick V. McCullen C. P. Ramani, P.E.Vice President PresidentInternational Accreditation Service, Inc.SCOPEOFACCREDITATIONProfessional Service Industries, Inc. PCA-109Third-Party Certification Body(Revised September 23, 2008)June 1, 2008Commencement Date C. P. Ramani, P.E.PresidentThis accreditation certificate supersedes any IAS accreditation certificate bearing an earlier date. The certificate becomes invalid upon suspension,cancellation, or revocation ofaccreditation.See the IASAccreditation Listingson the web at www.iasonline.org for current accreditationinformation, or contact IAS directly at (562) 699-0541. Page 2 of 2Professional Service Industries, Inc. Randy T Webb2710 West 5th AveTechnical DirectorEugene, OR 97402(541) 484-9212CATEGORIES of CERTIFICATIONWOOD PRODUCTSSTRUCTURAL PLYWOODHARDWOOD PLYWOODOSBSTRUCTURAL PANELSPARTICLE BOARDMEDIUM DENSITY FIBERBOARDHARDBOARDFORMALDEHYDE EMISSIONS FOR WOOD PRODUCTSCERTIFICATION UNDER CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCESBOARD (ARB) ANSI AND ANSI/HPVA STANDARDS
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

# Cryptologic Machines Image Gallery

HomeHistoryNational Cryptologic MuseumExhibits & ArtifactsCryptologic MuseumMachines

Search

Search

                              - All Images 
                              - Design Elements 
                              - NSA Historical Photographs 
                              - Other 

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

-  FIRST 
-   
-   
- 1 (current)
- 2
-   
-   
-  LAST
#### Pfister, Respondent, vs. McGovern and others, imp., Appellants.

*February 25*

September *24, 1907.*

*Affirmance on, equal division.*

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: LaweeNoe "W. Halsey, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside an order of a court commissioner adjudging the defendants *McGovern, Goff,*and *Cochems*to be in contempt and directing their commitment for their refusal to answer questions propounded to them in an examination before the court-commissioner under sec. 4096, Stats. (1898).

For the appellants there were briefs signed by *W. D. Cor-rigan*and *O. M. Fritz,*attorneys for *McGovern,*by *Adolph Kanneberg,*attorney for *Cochems,*by *Charles F. Hunter,*attorney for *Qo'jf,*and by *James G. Flanders*and *W. J. Turner,*of counsel; and the cause was argued orally by *Mr. Flamders, Mr. Turner,*and *Mr. John J. Cook.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Quarries, Spence & Qucnies, Thomas M. Kearney,*and *Spooner & Filis,*and oral argument by *Charles Quarles*and *George Lines.*

*534Tbe following decision was filed April 30, 1907:

Pee Oueiam.

By reason of having acted as an attorney for some of tbe parties to tbis action before be became a member of tbis court, Mr. Justice TimliN was unable to participate in its consideration. Tbe other justices being equally divided in opinion, tbe order appealed from is affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied September 24, 1907,. by an equally divided court.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
The Board of Directors
Lycos, Inc.:
 
  We consent to the use of our report incorporated herein by reference and to
the references to our firm under the headings "Experts" and "Selected
Historical Financial Data" in the proxy statement/prospectus.
                                             
                                          /s/ KPMG LLP     
 
Boston, Massachusetts
   
May 18, 1999
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                      ----------------------------------

We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of our
report dated December 9, 1999 relating to the financial statements of Prime
Response, Inc., which appear in such Registration Statement. We also consent to
the references to us under the headings "Experts" and "Selected Financial Data"
in such Registration Statement.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
December 9, 1999
--

-

v 

:::::... 

...r 

...:;:_ __ .., 

t.:::.. 

;i 

r; 

":>' 

.:;. 

0) 

~ r' 

.. 

-

1 ..... 

f> 

~ ... 

;.c 

-~ 

1. 

" ' .. 

' 

--

):_ 

..... 

'( 

'"I..::._:: 

.~ 

-... 

... 

-_, ... 

. 

" -4 

-

" 

.c::--

;; 

-".. 

-

.J. 

.... 

...... 

r_ 

_,-. 

_, " 

.... I 

-

....... .J\ 

~ 

~ 

-

"T 

--

I 

"' 

REF ID: A2 7 536-4 

\ 

Un.y 13, 1942 

1 

--Dear Col. Tilt.man· ~ 

- ~ 

~ _ I got together tbmeliiaterial for you as per our conve~tions and it is-beinif'shipped together with a good deal 

....J.,ot othe~ mat.er~al_frotn other sources. ~Amo..ng the books I have 

, sent, you wilr find three ora.rlge eolored paphlets on the ~Hittite hieroglyphics: These ~re pr~ded me by one of the 

ia9bers-'O.f ~he ~s~f of the O;prj_ental Institute at a 15% discount, which brings the total ..... for the t.nrea to $4.04, iirhich same 

I have already ,transmitted. A.t any tin\e tro.t it is convenient, 

it._:you._ .Qan rel.Dlburse me b;t, way of" senCing me some l. tems that you 

_,;:. ma7 .fin9 0"{8r thf!l:'e, I shall be mo_st appreciative and in this 

'!l way the exeba~e can be made 1':1..thout any red tape. ~ ~ fa 

- -

I ha~ another "Qook'by Gelb W"licll contains pnoto-

-:X g1'iphic plates of' the Hittite z:iaterial. The cost of tllis book 

~ ia $8.50 and I have not unde°i'taken to purchase a copy !'or you 1 uriless 1ou really .. wish to hav'f it. Ljlave- a copy of it and 

while I think lt ls a Y10rthwbile publication, it is a bit 

\ exl>en~ez ~ ..__ -1 - -:x 

,.L ...-- .. 

l --< -· By the~ time this let_:ter reaches y-ou, I suppose that 

Capt. Kullba.ck will be with YQU ana he earl brlng you up to date 

as._ to the stat.Us of our work on the Geheimschreiber. This looks 

- like a,JD.ost iute~sting problem ana l;.as us quite styir.ied at the 

moment. r-am beginning to suspect certain things and will 

communicat~ with you as ~oon_as we reaeh lrt'a.t appear to be valid 

_conclusions. We will be ~ost appreciative if you will similarly 

,..keep us informed. _ ~--

. :.:: _ I was very glad to learn of your safe arrival, notice 

_of whi.!l,_h was ogmnrunicated to me by Mi13s Chaplin. I cannot begJ.n 

~to te11 you how 'l!Uch I enjoyed your vi-sit and how beneficial 1 t 

:;ras. Plea:se 51 ve my ver-y beat regaro.e to Comdr. Denniston and 

tell him that I still bave_some letters o:f his crying for answers .. 

iti th very best regElrds, I am, } k _, 

-,, 

.., 

Sincerely yours, 

.;, William F. Friedman 

Head Cryptanalyst 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-15-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 
1 • ' i 

l ~I 

~ 

! t • I t ,, r f L ~ I . "1 j • , ' ' -1 i: f' I q I l JI 1 t ..., il r ~ t! t \1 t 

• I ' -I l ) "f .. I ' r C' t 1 I 'I' ' I I , l ) 

• ~ ; ' 1 I I ii ·~ ' .... i '1 " ~ . l 1 I ' t' ll "' ! l. f ) ! ' I) •' II ! I ., . '1 

' I 

.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Douglas J. Nesbit, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of HEI, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.                                                        /s/ Douglas J. Nesbit     Date: July 13, 2004 Douglas J. Nesbit*Chief Financial Officer*
## COURT OF APPEALS

SANDEE BRYAN MARION

CHIEF JUSTICE

KAREN ANGELINI

MARIALYN BARNARD

REBECA C. MARTINEZ

PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ

LUZ ELENA D. CHAPA

JASON PULLIAM

JUSTICES FOURTH COURT OF APPE ALS DISTRICT

CADENA

- REEVES JUSTICE CENTE R

300 DOLOROSA, SUIT E 3200

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8205

- 3037

WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4TH COA.ASPX KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

TELEPHONE

(210) 335

- 2635

FACSIMILE NO.

(210) 335

- 2762

August 5, 2015

Sean Alastair Keane

- Dawes

The Law Office of Sean Keane

- Dawes

118 Broadw ay St Ste 530

San Antonio, TX 78205

- 2378

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL * Andrew Warthen

Paul Elizondo Tower

101 W. Nueva St.

San Antonio, TX 78205

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 04

- 14

- 00867

- CR

Trial Court Case Number: 447516

Style: Roberto Flores

- Morales v. The State of Texas

Dear Counsel:

The above cause has been set for formal submission ON BRIEFS ONLY before this

Court on Tuesday, September 8, 2015

, before a panel consisting of Justice Rebeca C. Martinez,

Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, and Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa

.

Very truly yours,

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________ Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN SUCH
REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          13,670
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,721
<ALLOWANCES>                                       439
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,952
<PP&E>                                       1,472,751
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,220
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,463,215
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,242
<BONDS>                                        451,411
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           406
<OTHER-SE>                                     761,769
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,463,215
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               112,160
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,053
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,779
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,492
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,227
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,668
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,668
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,668
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .99


</TABLE>
# CE2004084EN.01015701.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/157 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/157

---

(2004/C 84 E/0194)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0070/04

by Ilda Figueiredo (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(20 January 2004)

Subject:   Chrome-plating factory in Tabaçò, Arcos de Valdevez

Subject:

Following my Question E-2437/03 (1) of 11 July 2003 and the reply of 23 September 2003, concerning the possible building of a polluting factory in Tabaçò, Arcos de Valdevez, Portugal, a statement by the Association for the defence of the Valdevez Natural Environment says that there is a risk of the Serraliber chrome-plating factory briefly starting chrome-plating operations in January 2004.

1

There is a revocation case before the courts (No C/000830/03) for failure to comply with the provisions of Decree Law No No 69/2000 of 3 May since the factory was built before the environmental impact assessment had been concluded.

What action has been taken since the Commission replied to me in September 2003?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(26 February 2004)

(26 February 2004)

Following its answer of 23 September 2003 to question E-2437/03 (1) by the Honourable Member on the same subject, the Commission can inform the Honourable Member that the Portuguese authorities have since replied to the letter it sent requesting further information on the construction of the proposed factory.

1

The Commission is currently examining the Portuguese authorities' reply. The situation will then be examined at a meeting between the Portuguese authorities and the Commission with a view to adopting a position on the complaints in question.

At that meeting, the Commission will not fail to question the Portuguese authorities regarding the impact assessment carried out on the project, and in particular the situation reported by the Honourable Member in her question.

---

(1)  OJ C 65 E, 13.3.2004.

1

---
REF ID:A517383 

MEMBERS OF AD HOC COMl,;ITTEE -- UNITED STATES 

RADM STONE 

COL. S.P. COLLINS 

LT. COL. F. COLLINS 

MR. WINSTON SCOTT 

MR. W.F. FRIEDMAN 

MR. R.F. PACKARD 

7·72810 (DAWSON) 

l4 143- 2795 

191- 2748 

kt c ./. Ct:ij6-cd P. ._, .. "" Y\""""- < ...-z.. o oCl4f c-~ o~~ w.. cJJ.. i>~w..-M •):h;'-

('PR L.it\1~- 1-.,55'f3Z.. 

C'ctrt ToJlov-- 7 -13Di1 7--, 2. 5 &lo 

c. 

"/'YIA. R r .~ ... J ),,.~~ 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 03-07-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-30347

Summary Calendar

IN RE:

VIOXX PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

JAMAL ALI BILAL, Formerly Known as John L. Burton,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus 

MERCK AND COMPANY, INCORPORATED,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:05-MD-1657

USDC No. 2:06-CV-2364

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 4, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 11-30347 Document: 00512073112 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/04/2012
No. 11-30347

Before SMITH, PRADO, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jamaal Bilal appeals a judgment dismissing his products-liability action

for failure to comply with pretrial obligationsSSspecifically, his failure to comply

with a Lone Pine order directing him to provide information regarding the

nature of his injuries and their relationship to the product in question. Bilal

lists four issues in his opening brief. There is no error, so we affirm. 

Bilal claims he was denied due process when, he says, “Vioxx Pro Se Curator failed to assist him in producing a proper doctor’s report need [sic] to comply

with [Pretrial Order] 28.” But it was Bilal’s obligation to produce evidence supporting his claim, and he did not.

Bilal complains that he was not allowed to testify at a fairness hearing. He

was heard through his briefs, however. He is civilly committed, and the district

court was not obliged to require his release to testify or appear in person.

Bilal says he should have been appointed a guardian ad litem. Such

appointments are required, however, only for incompetent persons, and Bilal

does not aver that he is incompetent.

Bilal asserts he should have been appointed counsel. This is not the sort

of extraordinary circumstance that compels appointed counsel in a civil case.

The judgment of dismissal is AFFIRMED. The motion to supplement the

record is DENIED.

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

2

 Case: 11-30347 Document: 00512073112 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/04/2012
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Research Engineers, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 
333-29747) on Form S-8 of Research Engineers, Inc. of our report dated May 29, 
1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Research Engineers, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 1997, and the related consolidated statements of 
income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the 
two-year period ended March 31, 1997, which report appears in the March 31, 1997
annual report on Form 10-KSB/A No. 2 of Research Engineers, Inc.


                                       KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Orange County, California
August 22, 1997
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.35


                 THE SMITH & WOLLENSKY RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.

                  AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 1995 STOCK OPTION PLAN


        In accordance with the provisions of Section 20 of the New York
Restaurant Group, L.L.C. 1995 Stock Option Plan, as amended to date (the
"Plan"), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, the Plan is hereby
amended effective, as follows:

        1.   The Plan shall hereafter be referred to as "The Smith &
Wollensky Restaurant Group, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan".

        2.   All references to in the Plan to Units shall be deemed for all
purposes to be references to shares of Common Stock of the Company, after
giving effect to the provisions of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as
of August 25, 1997 by and between The New York Restaurant Group, L.L.C., a
Delaware limited company and The New York Restaurant Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation.

        3.   This Amendment shall take effect as of the date of its adoption
by the Board of Directors.

        4.   Except as hereinabove provided, the Plan is hereby ratified and
confirmed in all respects.

                                THE SMITH & WOLLENSKY RESTAURANT
                                GROUP, INC.

                                By: /s/ James Dunn
                                    ----------------------------
                                    James Dunn, President


Adopted by the Board of Directors:   April 23, 2001
                                   ------------------