alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RE'J!}E£~fJ6102 6 g24 

USCIB: 29. 2/11 

COMSEC: 2-4/2 

30 September 1954 

lm(ORANDUM FOR '!HE MEMBERS OF THE: U.S. COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE BOARD 

U.S. COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY BOARD 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Disclosure of Details of ROCKEX by the U.K. to France. 

USCIB 29.2/10 of 20 September 1954 (CCHSEC 2-4/1 of 

17 September 1954). 

1. The reference was ref erred to USCIB for action and to USCSB for 

information. 

2. There having been no objection to the action proposed in the 

reference, the Director, NSA is authorized to inform the British of USCIB 

concurrence. 

USCIB: 29.2/11 

CCMSEC: 2-4/2 

tain, U. S. Navy 

Exe tive Secretary, USCIB/USCSB 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-21-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

SECREr
PMN Sanitized file Process Diagram DSP Ammonium
Exhibit24.2

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appointseach of Barry F. Schwartz, Robert K. Kretzman and Michael T. Sheehan orany of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-factand agent, with full power of substitution, for him and his name, placeand stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the REVLON,INC. (the "Corporation") Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Form10-K") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing,to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation oron behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of theCorporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument,contract, document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibitsthereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including thispower of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and anyapplicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body,granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone,full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thingrequisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fullyto all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, herebyratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents,each acting alone, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do orcause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has signed these presents this 8th day of March,2005.

|  | /s/ HOWARD GITTIS |
|--|-------------------|

|  |
|--|
|  |  |  |
|  |

HOWARDGITTIS

----
# CE2004084EN.01066201.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/662 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/662

---

(2004/C 84 E/0746)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0716/04

by Luis Berenguer Fuster (PSE) and Anna Terrón i Cusí (PSE) to the Commission

(10 March 2004)

Subject:   Radio alarms

Subject:

The problem of jamming is increasing exponentially due to the spectacular growth of the private security sector, and particularly sales of radio alarms, with security firms competing to under-price, so as to obtain the largest share of the market, ignoring the fact that alarms are security systems.

Does the Commission intend to take any steps to regulate this sector, so as to plug the existing legal gap?

Answer given by Mr Liikanen on behalf of the Commission

(19 April 2004)

(19 April 2004)

As the Honourable Member points out, the market for surveillance services that is offered to the public is growing. These services are competing on both quality and price aspects.

The Commission is, however, not aware that there are currently problems with the quality and reliability of such services that are attributable to congestions in and/or jamming of the radio frequency spectrum that they use.

This issue was discussed with Member States in the context of Directive 1999/5/EC (1) (the R&TTE Directive) in September 2000. At the time, it was judged that additional regulations to protect specific applications such as security alarms from harmful interference and to ensure access to emergency services were not necessary as it was deemed that market forces would already ensure this.

1

The Commission however intends to raise this issue again in the next meeting with Member States, scheduled for June 2004, so as to assess whether recent developments would require the Commission to reconsider the matter.

Furthermore, the Commission is currently studying the harmonisation across the EU of conditions of use of the radio spectrum for short-range devices including security alarms. Part of this analysis will consider how best to enable the effective operation of such devices via agreed technical parameters and appropriate radio spectrum frequencies.

---

(1)  Directive 1999/5/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 1999 on radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment and the mutual recognition of their conformity, OJ L 91, 7.4.1999.

1

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00004

- CV

CLEAR CREEK ENERGY, LLC

, Appellant

v.

Kent SCHWARTZ and Daina Schwartz,

Appellees

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10

- 04

- 0253

- CVA

Honorable Stella Saxon, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED

and this appeal is DISMISSED.

All costs are ORDERED assessed against the party who incurred them.

SIGNED June 26, 2013.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
*Wednesday, September 1, 1999*

MERIT DOCKET

99-584.

#### State ex rel. Budreaux v. Ryznar.

In Mandamus. On motion for judgment and motion for submission of newly discovered evidence. *Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
##### 



EMULEX CORPORATION CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emulex Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 26, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Paul F. Folino, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Paul F. FolinoPaul F. FolinoChief Executive OfficerNovember 4, 2004
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emulex Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 26, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Michael J. Rockenbach, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Michael J. RockenbachMichael J. RockenbachChief Financial OfficerNovember 4, 2004
 EXHIBIT 32
*Wednesday, August 18, 1999*

MOTION DOCKET

97-1111.

#### State v. Stojetz.

Madison C.P. No. 96CR10086. This cause came on for further consideration upon appellant’s application for reopening under S.CtPrac.R. XI(5). Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for reopening under S.CtPrac.R. XI(5) be, and hereby is, denied.
E-1

Appendix E

Teacher Roster
### 1

From: "Paul Boening" <PBoening@rsionline.org>

To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/01/2011 03:05 PM

Subject: RE: Recycling Services of Indiana

- Potential SER nomination

Rochelle

Thanks for considering me for the panel, unfortunately we no longer have the

scrap shredder. Does that disqualify me from the group?

Paul Boening

President

812

- 279

- 8114 w

812

- 583

- 2971 c

----- Original Message

-----

From: Rochelle Boyd [ mailto:Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov ]

Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 2:24 PM

To: Paul Boening

Cc: Ravi Srivastava; Chuck French

Subject: Recycling Services of Indiana

- Potential SER nomination

Back in May, the EPA sent o ut a news release and set up a web page

soliciting nominees to participate as a Small Entity Representative

(SER). This will allow you to provide input to the panel during this

rule making process. It is my understanding, based on your ICR

responses, tha t you are a small business as defined by the Small

Business Act and the EPA would like for you to consider participating in

this process. We also believe from your ICR response that you are a

Major Source with a regulated Scrap Shredder. OMB has requeste d that we

have a company on the SER's group meeting those requirements. Please

confirm these facts. Your level of participation is solely up to you.

You can elect to submit written comments or listen in on the conference

calls. If you are interested and you have a regulated Scrap Shredder,

please e

- mail me your contact person, company name, number of employees,

and contact information as soon as possible. Thanks

Note: I have included a link to the original web posting that is no

longer active, but pro vides information

http://www.epa.gov/sbrefa/secondaryaluminum.htm

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sect or Policies and Programs Division

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711

Mail Drop D243

- 02

Ph: (919) 541

- 1390 Fax: (919) 541

- 3207

Email: boyd.rochelle@epa.gov
.. 

j 

... 

... 

REF ID:A65309 

SECRET q 

USCIB: 13.2/45 

30 Novanber 1954 

SElSRm 

MEMORANDlli FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Clearance and Indoctrination tor Category III CCJiIINT 

(WIE:SNER and BAXTER). 

Exec. Secy. USCIB local T/T 231634Z Nov 1954. 

l. The enclosed request of the CIA member was circulated via 

local teletype a.s contained in the reference and was voted upon by 

Telecon. 

24 

2. As a result of the vote, all manbers approved the need to 

know. The Department of Defense member,, however,, stipulated that the 

CIA Security Office should exchange pertinent information with the 

Department of' Defense Security Office before completing action to indoctrinate the individuals concerned. 

Enclosure 

CIA Memo dtd 22 Nov 1954. 

USCIB: lJ.2/4.5 SECRET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-06-2014 pursuant to E .0. 1352a 

:. 
..... -

• 

7 

J-11.M- • 

REF ID:A65309 sr,,nn~ - .nCAD1 W 

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

22 NOV 1954 

MEMORANDtM FOR: Executive Secretaey, USClB 

SUBJECT 

REFERENCE 

Clearance for Cat. III COMINT 

: USCIB 13.2/29 

13.2/30 

13.2/32 

1. Dr. James R. Killian, Chainnan of the Special SubcODDJdttee 

of the Science Advisory Commi:ttee, Executive Office of The President, 

has requested that indoctrination for access to Cat. III CCMINT be 

authorized for two additional assistants. The facts in each case 

are set f'orth in the following paragraphs. 

2. Pro:f'essor Jerome B. Wiesner - It is contemplated that 

Professor Wiesner will act as a personal consultant to Dr. Killian, 

and will sit with the Steering Committee in its deliberations on 

all-source information, including CCMINT. 

3. Dr. James Phinney Baxter III - It is anticipated that Dr. 

Baxter will be a member of the Steering Committee, with a policymaking role in connection inter alia with weapons innovation. He 

will also engage in the preparation of the f'inal report tor The 

President, which, in its first stage~ will include codeword material. ...__..-- ~ ......,.;-= -.__.v ~ 

4. It is requested that USCIB determine the "need to know" 

of these two individuals. Reply by 24 November has been requested 

in the case of Dr. Baxt.er. 

5. Subsequent action, including necessary investigative procedures, will be undertaken by this Agency. 

FOR THE DIRF.CTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE: 

(SIGNED) 

HUNTINGTON D. SHELDON 

CIA MEMBER, USCIB 

Enclosure with USCIB 13.2/45 dtd 30 Nov 1954. 

SRCk:Ef'
# CE2004078EN.01060002.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/600 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/600

---

(2004/C 78 E/0635)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3607/03

by Olivier Duhamel (PSE) to the Commission

(5 December 2003)

Subject:   Vienna Observatory

Subject:

Does the Commission consider it acceptable for the EUMC, the European agency responsible for monitoring racism and xenophobia, to censor the publication of the report requested from the Centre for Research on Anti-Semitism at the Technical University of Berlin?

Does it share our view that it is not by concealing the appearance of new forms of anti-Semitism that we will help to combat them?

Is it aware of the risks that the EU may give the, albeit false, impression of being tolerant of anti-Semitism, on the pretext of not jeopardising young Palestinian supporters in the suburbs, who sometimes veer dangerously, or unconsciously, towards anti-Semitism?

Can it ask the Vienna Observatory not to hide behind this kind of cautious attitude, which provides grounds for accusations that it tolerates anti-Semitism? Can it advise the Vienna Observatory, and any other EU body, not to ask unnecessary questions when carrying out surveys, as these are always a delicate and sometimes imperfect matter, as we saw with the controversies following the publication of the Eurobarometer on threats to peace in the world?

We need a strong, clear and rapid reaction. The EU and its various representatives must not equivocate in their analysis of anti-Semitism or in the fight against it.

---
Exhibit 21



                      LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

NAME OF SUBSIDIARY               JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATION

The Exchange National Bank of    United States (national banking
  Jefferson City                   association)

Union State Bancshares, Inc.     Missouri

Mid Central Bancorp, Inc.        Missouri

ENB Holdings, Inc.               Missouri

Union State Bank and Trust of    Missouri
  Clinton

Osage Valley Bank                Missouri

USBT Acquisition Co., Inc.       Missouri

Jefferson City IHC, LLC          Missouri (limited liability
                                   company)

Jefferson City Mortgage Co.,     Missouri (limited liability
  LLC                              company)

Clinton IHC, LLC                 Missouri (limited liability
                                   company)

Clinton Mortgage Company, LLC    Missouri (limited liability
                                   company)
<PAGE>
EX-4.1






Exhibit 4.1










 









 







The Shares represented by this certificate have not been registered under either the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or applicable state securities laws, and they may not be sold, offered for
sale or transferred in the absence of an effective registration under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, and the applicable state securities laws or an opinion of counsel satisfactory in form
and substance to counsel for the Company that such transaction will not result in a prohibited
transaction under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the applicable state securities laws.



The corporation will furnish to any shareholder upon request and without charge, a full statement
of the designations, preferences, limitations, and relative rights of the shares of each class or
series authorized to be issued, so far as they have been determined, and the authority of the Board
to determine the relative rights and preferences of subsequent classes or series.
# CE2004078EN.01064202.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/642 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/642

---

(2004/C 78 E/0682)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3759/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject:   Update on use of funding from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of Pistoia

Subject:

In its answer to question E-1026/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Pistoia had submitted projects and secured funding under the 2000 City Twinning Programme, the Commission stated that no funding had been granted for the year 2000.

1

Can the Commission say whether the municipality has submitted any projects and obtained and used any funding in the budget years since then?

---

(1)  OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 208.

1

---
Exhibit 32

    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Epoch Holding Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the third fiscal quarter ended March 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), William W. Priest, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Mark E. Wilson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented
          in the Report.


Dated:  May 16, 2005                 By:  /s/ William W. Priest
                                            _____________________
                                          William W. Priest
                                          Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  May 16, 2005                 By:  /s/ Mark E. Wilson
                                          _______________________
                                          Mark E. Wilson
                                          Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1728 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1728

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide equal access to 
   declaratory judgments for organizations seeking tax-exempt status.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 9, 2015

   Mr. Coats introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide equal access to 
   declaratory judgments for organizations seeking tax-exempt status.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Access to Court Challenges for 
Exempt Status Seekers (ACCESS) Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. EQUAL ACCESS TO DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS FOR ORGANIZATIONS SEEKING 
              TAX-EXEMPT STATUS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (A) of section 7428(a)(1) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(A) with respect to the initial qualification or 
                continuing qualification of an organization as an 
                organization described in section 501(c) or 501(d) 
                which is exempt from tax under section 501(a) or as an 
                organization described in section 170(c)(2),''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to pleadings filed after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 15 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 15

 To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to recognize the authority of States 
    to regulate oil and gas operations and promote American energy 
    security, development, and job creation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 6, 2015

   Mr. Hatch introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to recognize the authority of States 
    to regulate oil and gas operations and promote American energy 
    security, development, and job creation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting States' Rights to Promote 
American Energy Security Act''.

SEC. 2. STATE AUTHORITY FOR HYDRAULIC FRACTURING REGULATION.

    The Mineral Leasing Act is amended--
            (1) by redesignating section 44 (30 U.S.C. 181 note) as 
        section 45; and
            (2) by inserting after section 43 (30 U.S.C. 226-3) the 
        following:

``SEC. 44. STATE AUTHORITY FOR HYDRAULIC FRACTURING REGULATION.

    ``(a) Definition of Hydraulic Fracturing.--In this section the term 
`hydraulic fracturing' means the process by which fracturing fluids (or 
a fracturing fluid system) are pumped into an underground geologic 
formation at a calculated, predetermined rate and pressure to generate 
fractures or cracks in the target formation and, as a result, increase 
the permeability of the rock near the wellbore and improve production 
of natural gas or oil.
    ``(b) Prohibition.--The Secretary of the Interior shall not enforce 
any Federal regulation, guidance, or permit requirement regarding 
hydraulic fracturing, or any component of hydraulic fracturing, 
relating to oil, gas, or geothermal production activities on or under 
any land in any State that has regulations, guidance, or permit 
requirements for hydraulic fracturing.
    ``(c) State Authority.--The Secretary shall recognize and defer to 
State regulations, guidance, and permitting for all activities 
regarding hydraulic fracturing, or any component of hydraulic 
fracturing, relating to oil, gas, or geothermal production activities 
on Federal land regardless of whether the regulations, guidance, and 
permitting are duplicative, more or less restrictive, have different 
requirements, or do not meet Federal regulations, guidance, or permit 
requirements.''.
                                 <all>
```