alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004084EN.01059102.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/591 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/591

---

(2004/C 84 E/0667)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0457/04

by Mihail Papayannakis (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(23 February 2004)

Subject:   Strain on main roads

Subject:

Local organisations and associations in the municipality of Voula are complaining that the Greek Parliament has adopted an amendment relating to the use of the land along sections of major roads, such as the avenues Vouliagmenis, Varis and Karamanli, in order to allow commercial activities in an area which has been designated ‘purely residential’ since 1926. The status of the land is defined in Presidential Decrees of 1926, 1934, 1940 and 1952 and is confirmed by the Council of State in its decisions 554/2000, 2314 and 2315/2002 as well as Law 3044/2002.

Furthermore, recent research carried out by the National Technical University of Athens shows that commercial activity along main roads such as Vouliagmenis creates serious problems for the operation of the network and has a detrimental impact on the environment and the rest of the residential fabric of the area. Moreover, according to the fundamental principles of the EU's operational programme, the construction of roads is subsidised with a view to improving the quality of life in large cities, and reducing traffic congestion and air pollution.

Will the Commission intervene to prevent the deterioration of the urban environment in the area?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(1 April 2004)

(1 April 2004)

Under Article 211 of the EC Treaty, the Commission is responsible for ensuring that Member States properly apply Community law. In matters which are not covered by Community law the Commission is unable to intervene.

The situation described by the Honourable Member does not appear to be covered by Community law. So the Commission would have no basis for intervening. The matter would have to be brought to the attention of the appropriate authorities in Greece.

---
/ REF ID:A517092 

-TOP SECflET 

10 October 1952 

/EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Nlll08Allllll ,. - MCCJ!D 

SUB.DC'll V.8. ~cy on CCHDIT/veraua COOFC 

BDDB&Jla Jlaam'M¥lm tor thei Cbaiman, UBC'.m, f'rcn 113CIB 

Coordimtor, da~ 27 Avgust 1952, subJect 

"Btat.-it ot U.S. Policy," vi th Two Inclosurea 

l. Betenmce ~ vu baadcarried to the Cha.1ma.n 

ot VSCD 'by tbo Coor41Dator, vbo in turn referred it to the undersipd. 

2. In a ~ cliacusaion respecting this zubJect, 

General Smith, 88 CbairmaD of mcm, expreeeecl. tbe f'ollowins view: 

a. It VtUld/DOt be necesaary to obtain a policy decision 

tmn 51 .. JBC relating to tbe releaae ot COi '• to I _(\BCD 2/~) 1 aince, regardl.eea ot the 

ca) y of the 1l1C decision in the case ot 

CCC1J11Pm1 cat.ion aecuri ty, there wu no dissent 

to 11Uch release at ite meeting ot 

lB July 1952· 

b. AltbOlagb it 1a recognized that it vov.ld be demirabl.e 

to have a vell-ccaaiclered policy cm the question ot 

CCJIDl'r vereua CCllmC, it ia felt that auch a policy 

abm1 Jd be developed on an a4 hoc 'basa, comideri.Dg 

each caae cm ite merit.a. ID order to do this, it 

vill not be neceeaary to eecure a general. policy 

deciaion trm t.be EC; instead, the tollavi.Dg 

procedure appean to be adequate: 

(1) Ia each cue ariaiDg before uscm involving a 

queeticm of CCllDT veraua C08!C, the BOf.U"d 

ahwl4 be requested to cOD8ider this 1uue and., 

tor that purpoae, all neceeaar-J' preHm:lnary 

atudt• 8D4 recc•l!er!blJatiODll abaW.d be made. 

ID the event that mcm !JDRllinou&ly ~ 

that C001IT or CC1BBC 1e pm-amoullt :l.n the 

particular case 1 there vill be DO neces.-.1 ty 

tor a policy decieiOG by EC. 

TOP SECRET 

eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-14-2014 pursuant to E.O. 

3526 

• 
~ REF ~:A517092 

TOP ~EGRET 

(2) Wl1ere tbere is aiey- disagreement in 1ECIB a.a 

to Vhetber C<llIIT or COISEC should be paramount 

in a partie\llar case, it Will be appropriate 

to request :the BSC to resolve this issue. 

3. Slibeequently J tollaw:iDg the U3CIB meeti.Dg on l.2 September 

l.952, I cmve)ed. CJeDeraJ. Smith •a View to General Ca.nine arid it. vaa 

agreed that the prooelure suggested by Genen.l Smith liCNld be 

:f'olloHec\. A~, tlJere is no need :t"or an BSC policy decision 

an mcm 2/et>, but, 1D each :na,ture eitua.tion inVolVing e.n iaaue 

betveeJl CCJOll'.r 8114 CClllBC I 8UCh iaS'Ue Vil.l be determined in the 

tirat imteace by lllCD am., Jacltlng 'UDimit.y !n IECIB, by the EC. 

1AlF'J.U) E. BICKER 

Deputy Director /rnt.ewsence 

TOP SECRET
EXHIBIT 31A
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Paul F. Folino, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Emulex Corporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport in being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
Date: February 4, 2005       /s/ Paul F. Folino       Paul F. Folino
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Banyan Systems Incorporated on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-50860, 33-50862, 33-50864,
33-54140, 33-57734, 33-78804, 33-92312, 33-95288, 333-22631, 333-26857, 333-
28745, 333-28675, 333-40671 and 333-46259) of our reports dated January 27,
1998, except as to the information presented in Note Q, for which the date is
March 6, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Banyan Systems Incorporated as of December 31,
1997 and 1996, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
1997, which reports are included or incorporated by reference in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

                                             /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

                                             COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Boston, Massachusetts
March 30, 1998
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.4

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of LTC Properties, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wendy L. Simpson,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
           of the Company.

/s/ WENDY L. SIMPSON
--------------------
Wendy L. Simpson
March 31, 2003
l::n:•'I:" TT'li • 'J\ fi5 :j: :j: S 

MEMO R19iNG SLIP i --NEVER USE Fui< ,;;:;:RoVALS,SPROVALS. 

CONCURRENCES, OR SJMIL TIONS 

. I NAME OR TITLE INITIAlS CIRCULATE 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION DATE COORDINATION 

2 FILE 

- INFORMATION 

3 NECESSARY ACTION 

NOTE AND RETURN 

A SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

REMARKS 

~ ""\ \ ~~°'""- ~ ~ "L - ~·~+O 

~~Q~~~ tv---.).o.. "' 

I 

~. ~ 

'"' I 

I 

\(~ 

\~-~ 

l_~ 

~-A-~"..&Q e_c:.\. ~J) l 't'-

~~~·. '0:--

Declassified and 

~~ Eipproved for release 

DY NSA on 

~ - c.c;::::, b9-16-2014 

oursuantto E.O. 

~-, 13526 

FROM NAME OR TITLE I ~ ".:.... DATE 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION TELEPHONE 

DD FORM 9 5 Replaces DA AGO Forw 806, 1 Apr 4S, and AFRQ I FEB 50 Form 1.2, 10 Nov 4.7, which may be used. 
REF ID:A65778 

MEMO R91NG SLIP NEVER USE FOR APPROVALS.PPROVALS, 

CONCURRENCES, OR SIMI CTIONS 

1 NAME OR TITLE INITIALS 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION DATE 

2 

3 

4 

REMARKS 

CIRCULATE 

COORDINATION 

FILE 

INFORMATION 

NECESSARY ACTION 

NOTE AND RETURN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

~.~""~~ 

~'e~~~~~~ 

-._! ~~s. '\- ~~ 

~~~~ ~4 

(~4 .. ~~-tc.Q-. ~~ Q__~~~~~=' 

~ ~~~\) 

FROM NAME OR TITLE DATE 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION TELEPHONE 

DD FORM 9 5 Replaces DA AGO Form 890, I Apr 48, a11d AFHQ 1 f£8 li0 Fonn 12, 10 Nov 47, wh1cb may be usod. 
REF ID:A65778 

C :>NFIOE:"~TI~. -

Requeat for Conterenoe Badges 

security Division 

ATTN s LTJG Haag 

Cons1ll. tant; S March 1952 

l+ It is requested that conference badges be made available to the tollowing 

persons 1lho are members of tho Special CryptologLo .AdViaory Group ( SCAO) tor the 

dates 12 and 13 March 1952. 

Dr. Stewart s. Cairns 

Mr. Joseph Desch 

Mr. John H. Howard 

Mr. John Clow McPherson 

Dr. John von Neumann 

Dr. R. I. Potter 

Dr. H. P. Robertson 

Dr. Claude E. Shannon 

Dr. Charles B. Tompkins 

Mr. William Webster 

2. Inasmuch ae tho conference is to be held at Arlington Hall Station, it is 

requested t..>:tat the badges be made available to these persona at Arlington Hall 

Statim by 1.300 hours, 12 March 19$2. 

MARY C. LANE 

Capta!~I WAC 

Ext. 00493 

4 

I
**EXHIBIT31.1****Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer****CERTIFICATION**I, John R. Gibson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Pacific Corporation (the“registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably like to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: February 14, 2007 By:  /s/ JOHN R. GIBSON    John R. Gibson    Chief Executive Officer
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1702 

To require the administering authority to determine an individual 

countervailable subsidy rate upon request if four or fewer exporters 

and producers are involved in the investigation or review, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 25, 2015 

Mr. KING (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. LEAHY, and Mr. MANCHIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To require the administering authority to determine an individual countervailable subsidy rate upon request if four 

or fewer exporters and producers are involved in the 

investigation or review, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fairness in Respond5 ent Selection Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1702 IS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO DETERMINE INDIVIDUAL 

2 COUNTERVAILABLE SUBSIDY RATE IF FOUR 

3 OR FEWER EXPORTERS AND PRODUCERS 

4 ARE INVOLVED IN THE INVESTIGATION OR 

5 REVIEW. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 777A(e) of the Tariff Act 

7 of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677f–1(e)) is amended by adding at 

8 the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(3) INDIVIDUAL SUBSIDY RATE UPON RE10 QUEST.— 

11 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—If the administering 

12 authority determines under paragraph (2) that 

13 it is not practicable to determine an individual 

14 countervailable subsidy rate for an exporter or 

15 producer and the number of exporters and pro16 ducers involved in the investigation or review is 

17 not more than 4, the administering authority 

18 shall, at the request of the exporter or pro19 ducer, determine an individual countervailable 

20 subsidy rate for the exporter or producer. 

21 ‘‘(B) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Subpara22 graph (A) may not be construed as specifying 

23 that more than 4 exporters and producers con24 stitutes a large number of exporters and pro25 ducers for purposes of paragraph (2).’’. 

26 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1702 IS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to any investigation or re3 view initiated by the administering authority on or 

4 after March 1, 2015. 

5 (2) ADMINISTERING AUTHORITY DEFINED.—In 

6 this subsection, the term ‘‘administering authority’’ 

7 has the meaning given that term in section 771(1) 

8 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677(1)). 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1727 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1727

          To rename the National Florence Crittenton Mission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 9, 2015

   Mr. Wyden introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To rename the National Florence Crittenton Mission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL CRITTENTON FOUNDATION.

    Section 1 of the Act of April 9, 1898, entitled an Act ``To 
incorporate the National Florence Crittenton Mission'' is amended by 
striking ``National Florence Crittenton Mission'' and inserting ``The 
National Crittenton Foundation''.
                                 <all>
```
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 169 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow any deduction 

for punitive damages, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 13, 2015 

Mr. LEAHY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow 

any deduction for punitive damages, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Tax Write-offs for 

5 Corporate Wrongdoers Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DISALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION FOR PUNITIVE 

7 DAMAGES. 

8 (a) DISALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 162(g) of the Inter10 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 169 IS

1 (A) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and 

2 (2) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively, 

3 (B) by striking ‘‘If’’ and inserting: 

4 ‘‘(1) TREBLE DAMAGES.—If’’, and 

5 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

6 paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(2) PUNITIVE DAMAGES.—No deduction shall 

8 be allowed under this chapter for any amount paid 

9 or incurred for punitive damages in connection with 

10 any judgment in, or settlement of, any action.’’. 

11 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading 

12 for section 162(g) of such Code is amended by in13 serting ‘‘OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES’’ after ‘‘LAWS’’. 

14 (b) INCLUSION IN INCOME OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES

15 PAID BY INSURER OR OTHERWISE.— 

16 (1) IN GENERAL.—Part II of subchapter B of 

17 chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

18 amended by adding at the end the following new sec19 tion: 

20 ‘‘SEC. 91. PUNITIVE DAMAGES COMPENSATED BY INSUR21 ANCE OR OTHERWISE. 

22 ‘‘Gross income shall include any amount paid to or 

23 on behalf of a taxpayer as insurance or otherwise by rea24 son of the taxpayer’s liability (or agreement) to pay puni25 tive damages.’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 169 IS

1 (2) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—Section 6041 

2 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the 

3 following new subsection: 

4 ‘‘(h) SECTION TO APPLY TO PUNITIVE DAMAGES

5 COMPENSATION.—This section shall apply to payments by 

6 a person to or on behalf of another person as insurance 

7 or otherwise by reason of the other person’s liability (or 

8 agreement) to pay punitive damages.’’. 

9 (3) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of 

10 sections for part II of subchapter B of chapter 1 of 

11 such Code is amended by adding at the end the fol12 lowing new item: 

‘‘Sec. 91. Punitive damages compensated by insurance or otherwise.’’. 

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this section shall apply to damages paid or incurred on 

15 or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Administrative Office: 2700 “M” Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, CA 93301-2370 

Phone (661) 862-5250 – Fax (661) 862-5251 

www.kernair.org – ekapcd@co.kern.ca.us

Glen E. Stephens, P.E. 

Air Pollution Control Officer 

astern Kern 

Air Pollution Control District 

 E

April 21, 2014 

Mr. Patrick Au 

Air Resources Board 

Stationary Source Division 

P.O. Box 2815 

Sacramento, CA 95815 

SUBJECT: Draft Rule 432, Polyester Resin Operations 

Dear Mr. Au: 

Enclosed is the Rule Action Package for Draft Rule 432, Polyester Resin Operations adopted by the Eastern Kern 

Air Pollution Control District (District) Board of Directors on March 13, 2014. Rule 432 became effective upon 

Board Adoption. The package is being sent electronically to pau@arb.ca.gov. The District requests that the 

California Air Resources Board (CARB) forward all appropriate documentation to U.S. EPA Region IX office as 

a revision to the District’s SIP. 

The District also requests that ARB update their District Rule database of Rules and Regulations located on the 

ARB website at http://www.arb.ca.gov/drdb/ker/cur.htm to include Rule 432 once it has been approved by EPA. 

Included in the Rule Action Package are the following attachments: 

1) Complete Clean Copy of the Rule 

2) Strikeout Underline Copy of the Rule 

3) Certified Governing Board Resolution 

4) Certified Notice of Exemption to the Clerk 

5) Evidence of Public Hearing 

6) Public Comments and Responses (included in Final Staff Report) 

7) Other Materials (Final Staff Report, Certified Board Summary, and Copy of Referenced Rules) 

Rule 410.4, Metal, Plastic, and Pleasure Craft Parts and Products Coating Operations and Rule 410.4A, Motor 

Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Refinishing Operations were also amended on March 13, 2014 and Draft Rules 

410.8, Aerospace Assembly and Coating Operations and 410.9, Wood Products Surface Coating Operations were 

adopted and are being submitted as separate packages. Should you have any questions, please contact Jeremiah 

Cravens AQS II Cravensj@co.kern.ca.us or (661) 862-5250. 

Sincerely, 

Glen E. Stephens, P.E. 

Air Pollution Control Officer 

GES:JC