alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004084EN.01014301.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/143 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/143

---

(2004/C 84 E/0181)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-4070/03

by José Ribeiro e Castro (UEN) to the Commission

(14 January 2004)

Subject:   Conventions, Charter and Constitution: the costs

Subject:

A great deal of work was done at European level to draft a new treaty entitled ‘Constitution for Europe’. The same can be said for the preparation, prior to that, of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, which is now supposed to form Part II of the Constitution.

With reference to:

| — | the two Conventions, and |
| --- | --- |

—

the two Conventions, and

| — | the public information campaigns carried out all over the European Union, including the publication of both documents, |
| --- | --- |

—

the public information campaigns carried out all over the European Union, including the publication of both documents,

can the Commission say:

| — | whether it can supply comprehensive information broken down by sector, about the costs incurred in the preparation and presentation of the Charter and Constitution and borne by the Community budget in 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003; |
| --- | --- |

—

whether it can supply comprehensive information broken down by sector, about the costs incurred in the preparation and presentation of the Charter and Constitution and borne by the Community budget in 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003;

| — | whether it can provide an analysis of these costs, duly broken down by year and making a distinction between the costs of the direct operation of the two Conventions on the one hand and any other costs incurred by EU bodies on the other, in particular for information or other measures? |
| --- | --- |

—

whether it can provide an analysis of these costs, duly broken down by year and making a distinction between the costs of the direct operation of the two Conventions on the one hand and any other costs incurred by EU bodies on the other, in particular for information or other measures?

---
# CE2004084EN.01019602.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/196 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/196

---

(2004/C 84 E/0239)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0304/04

by Pietro-Paolo Mennea (NI) to the Commission

(2 February 2004)

Subject:   Prison guards

Subject:

Various press reports and reports from the department concerned have highlighted the difficulties currently facing the Italian prison guards' service.

In accordance with staffing provisions laid down by former Minister Fassino (Ministerial Decree of 8 February 2001) this service is currently estimated to comprise 45 000 men and women in more than 200 prison establishments in Italy, including 12 in Puglia, with a total staff of 2 850 officers, which means 500 fewer than requirements for a prison population of 3 800, of whom many are terrorists, or members of the Mafia or other organised crime networks.

Despite this precarious situation, the Minister of Justice, Roberto Castelli, has decided, as part of new personnel plans, to transfer some 300 units provisionally from the south to the north of Italy, including 77 officers from Puglia, without even providing for mission expenses, other than a tiny allowance of EUR 12 per day.

It is well known that international organised crime and the activities of Albanian mafia groups are constantly increasing in the south of Italy. This transfer of prison personnel has therefore given rise to serious concern, which has been voiced by the OSAPP trade union.

In view of the above, does the Commission intend to take action to ensure that this situation does not adversely affect the internal security of prisons in Italy, law and order, and the quality of life of prison personnel and their families?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(20 February 2004)

(20 February 2004)

The transfer of prison personnel within Italy, to which the Honourable Member refers, must be considered as a question regarding the maintenance of law and order and the safeguarding of internal security in Italy. The Commission can not intervene in this matter, as it is the Member States themselves, which, pursuant to Article 3 3 of the Treaty on European Union, are responsible for what action should be taken to maintain law and order and to safeguard their internal security. The transfer of prison personnel within Italy is, therefore, not a question of police or judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the framework of the Treaty on European Union.

---
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No. FAA - 2011 - 0449 Directorate ID: 20 10 - SW - 021 -AD Helicopter Model: Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Model 206A, 206B, and 206B3 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 1,463 Costs : 

### The cost to revise the operating limitations section of the Rotorcraft Flight Manual for each helicopter is negligible, and there are no required parts. Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer: Mark Wiley
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

  We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to
the use of our report dated February 12, 1999, except for the eighth paragraph
of Note 1 and the second paragraph of Note 6, as to which the date is March 26,
1999, and the ninth paragraph of Note 1, as to which the date is April 12,
1999, with respect to the financial statements of MobileMedia Communications,
Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 1998, included in the prospectus of Arch
Communications, Inc. that is made a part of the Registration Statement on Form
S-4 for the registration of $147,000,000 principal amount of 13 3/4% senior
notes.

                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

MetroPark, New Jersey
July 15, 1999
# CE2004078EN.01059301.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/593 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/593

---

(2004/C 78 E/0626)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3566/03

by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(2 December 2003)

Subject:   Refund of budgetary resources

Subject:

In a communication dated 29 October 2003, the Commission has proposed that unused budgetary resources from the 2003 Community budget amounting to EUR 5 billion be refunded to the Member States.

From which actions funded by the budget are these unused resources derived?

Answer given by Mrs Schreyer on behalf of the Commission

(22 December 2003)

(22 December 2003)

The Honourable Member is referring to the proposal made by the Commission in the Preliminary Draft Amending Budget No7 to hand back to the Member States EUR 5 billion in surplus payment appropriations in heading 2 of the Budget. The surplus appropriations were on the budget lines for the completion of the pre-2000 Structural Funds programmes.

The Commission's proposal has now been adopted, as an Amending Budget No 6, by the Budgetary Authority.

---
# CE2004078EN.01091701.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/917 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/917

---

(2004/C 78 E/0969)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0028/04

by Philip Bushill-Matthews (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(9 January 2004)

Subject:   Age discrimination

Subject:

Could the Commission confirm whether it intended the Age Discrimination Directive (Council Directive 2000/78/EC (1) of 27 November 2000) to outlaw the giving of long-service awards or celebratory parties for employees of say 25 years' service?

1

Has the Commission had any queries from any Member State in this regard?

Given that some employers in the UK are concerned that younger workers might regard such rewards as discriminatory and could sue, would the Commission agree that official clarification would be helpful to avoid such an eventuality?

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(13 February 2004)

(13 February 2004)

Council's Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 puts in place a framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation, and prohibits discrimination on grounds of age, disability, religion or belief or sexual orientation. The Directive covers access to employment, pay, working conditions, dismissal, training, etc. and both direct and indirect discrimination are covered. The Member States had to transpose the Directive by 2 December 2003, and once it is transposed people must take their case before the national courts under national law.

The Commission considers that the giving of long-service medals or other methods of celebrating long service would not be considered as discriminatory as they are awarded on the basis of seniority rather than age as such.

---

(1)  OJ L 303, 2.12.2000, p. 16.

1

---
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                              KINDER MORGAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                          EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                            (Dollars In Thousands)


FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,                                 2002                2001                2000
======================================================================================================================
<S>                                                        <C>                  <C>                 <C>

Weighted-average number of limited partner units on
  which limited partners' net income per unit is based:


Basic                                                       172,016,574          153,901,311         126,213,102
Add:  Incremental units under common unit option plan           169,065              208,764              87,428
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assuming dilution                                           172,185,639          154,110,075         126,300,530

======================================================================================================================

Net Income                                                 $    608,377         $    442,343        $    278,348

Less:  General Partner's interest in Net Income                (270,816)            (202,095)           (109,470)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Limited Partners' interest in Net Income                   $    337,561         $    240,248        $    168,878

======================================================================================================================
Limited Partners' Net Income per unit:
Basic                                                      $       1.96         $       1.56        $       1.34
Diluted                                                    $       1.96         $       1.56        $       1.34


</TABLE>
Exhibit
24.7

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN ALL MEN BY
THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints
each of Robert K. Kretzman and Michael T. Sheehan or either of them,
each acting alone, her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with
full power of substitution, for her and her name, place and stead, in
any and all capacities, in connection with the REVLON, INC. (the
"Corporation") Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Form
10-K") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation or
on behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of the
Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument,
contract, document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form
10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits
thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including this
power of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any
applicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body,
granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone,
full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully
to all intents and purposes as she might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents,
each acting alone, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or
cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has signed these presents this 18th day of
February, 2004.

/s/ LINDA GOSDEN ROBINSON

|
|
|
|

LINDA GOSDEN
ROBINSON

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>          SEP-30-1997

<CASH>                       3,712,482 
<SECURITIES>                      0    
<RECEIVABLES>                5,463,826 
<ALLOWANCES>                      0    
<INVENTORY>                       0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             9,176,308 
<PP&E>                      96,547,851 
<DEPRECIATION>                    0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>             114,261,520 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>       55,068,787 
<BONDS>                     84,127,509 
<COMMON>                          0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0    
<PREFERRED>                       0    
<OTHER-SE>                 (29,813,446)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>114,261,520 
<SALES>                     20,175,954 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>            20,622,299 
<CGS>                             0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>               13,204,244 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               512,168 
<LOSS-PROVISION>            13,143,000 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>           9,839,106 
<INCOME-PRETAX>            (16,076,219)
<INCOME-TAX>                      0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>        (15,709,431)
<DISCONTINUED>                    0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0    
<CHANGES>                         0    
<NET-INCOME>               (15,709,431)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  (109.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                  (109.74)

        


</TABLE>
REF ID:A57368 

TOP SECR.Ef' e 

':POP SEi9ffEllP = l::J. S. E?ll!lS GPIY 

SUBJECT NUMBER 

USCIB: 9 .3/12 

Subject: 

Item 3 of the Agenda for the 19th Meeting of USCIBEC, 

held on 21 September 1954. 

USCIB Master Requirements List (USCIB 9.3/7). 

When the Chairman introduced this item and asked for comments, 

MR. POLYZOIDES stated that he has had insufficient time in which to give 

the matter due consideration and asked that a postponement be granted. 

CAPTAIN TAYLOR stated that there is one rather pressing problem in 

connection with this item, namely, the provision of guidance to the 

Intelligence Committee. He said that he understands NSA will provide 

information on this point, and asked if the members wished to delay consideration until such information is forthcoming. 

Following a brief discussion it was agreed to defer further consideration or this item with the understanding that it would be forwarded 

to the Intelligence Committee for study with a view to determining 

whether Intelligence Requirements are currently set forth in a form 

which is most suitable and useful to all concerned. The Intelligence 

Committee report, when complete, will be referred to USCIBEC for consideration. 

DECISION: (21 September 1954) USCIBEC agreed to defer consideration of 

this item and referred the matter to the Intelligence Committee for its 

opinion regarding the adequacy of the report and recommendations as to 

what changes or additions, if any, are advisable to increase its usefulness. 

USCIB: 9.3/12 - 5 -

TO.DSECRET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-04-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B
MEMO ROUTING SLIP VER USE FOR APPROVALS, DISAPPROVALS, 

CONCURRENCES, OR SI/llILAR ACTIONS 

I NAME OR TITLE INITIALS 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION DATE 

2 

3 

4 

REMARKS 

roved for Release b NSA on 04-02-2014 

DD 1 FFOERM 95 R~pl,1c.·~ DA AOO ~11rmtl9r., 1 o\l'r ~H.aml AFHQ B 50 Form 12, 10 Nn\ 47, which may bu used. 

CIRCULATE 

COORDINATION 

FILE 

NECESSARY ACTION 

NOTE AND RETURN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

DATE 

TELEPHONE 

- GPO 1051 • 0 025564
# CE2004088EN.01020301.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/203 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/203

---

(2004/C 88 E/0210)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0670/04

by Proinsias De Rossa (PSE) to the Commission

(9 March 2004)

Subject:   Commission investigation into discharges of oil at Poolbeg Peninsula, Dublin

Subject:

What reply, if any, has the Commission received from Ireland in response to the letter of formal notice sent to Ireland in April 2003, as announced in IP/03/544, regarding the Irish Government's failure to cooperate with the Commission's investigation into complaints about discharges of oil into water next to a special protection area at Poolbeg Peninsula in August 2002 and Ireland's compliance with the Dangerous Substances Directive (76/464/EEC (1)) and the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC (2))?

1

2

What action has the Commission taken or is it considering in this matter?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(21 April 2004)

(21 April 2004)

The Commission letter of formal notice referred to by the Honourable Member addressed non-cooperation by Ireland consisting in a failure to respond to a request for information about compliance with environmental legislation at the Poolbeg Peninsula in Dublin. Ireland did not respond to the letter of formal notice, and consequently the Commission notified a Reasoned Opinion in December 2003. Ireland subsequently provided a detailed response to the Commission's original information request. This response is considered as having brought to an end the infringement for non-cooperation based on Article 10 of the EC Treaty, and no further action is currently contemplated on this ground. The Commission is still considering the substantive issues raised by the original complaint (3).

3

---

(1)  OJ L 129, 18.5.1976, p. 23.

1

(2)  OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7.

2

(3)  P2001/4789.

3

---
t 

office at Aragon House Business Centre, Dragonara Road, St. Julian's ST J 3140, Malta 

(Address) 

hereby designates. pursuant to section 46103 ofTitle 49 of the U.S. Code 1 formerly section 1005tbl of the Feder;tl A' iation Act 

of 1958. as amended! the person named below as its Agent upon whom servke of all notices ;.md .. ;md all d!!cision .... 

and requiremems of the Depm1menr of'Transponntion may be made for and on behalf of said canier. hereby pre,·ious 

of agents made by it to the DOT. 

Name of Agent John R. Copley Ucopley@ggh-airlaw.com) & Erin Tallardy Katz (ekatz@ggh-airlaw.com) 

(Please Print) 

Address Garofalo Goerlich Hainbach, 1200 New Hampshire Ave NW, Washington DC 20036 

The Agent so designated has wriuen his name and also his initials in the following space; 

Name Enn b.t:y (Initials)_ ... ____ _ 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF. Albinati Aviation Ltd ------------------·----- has caused these 

(Name of Company) 

presents to be signed in its name by ______ s_t_ef_a_n_o_A_Ib_i_na_t_i,_A_c_c_o_u_nt_a_b_le_M_a_na_g""e_r _____ . 

(Please Print) 

of said company. and to be attested under its corporate seal by 

Laurence Gatt Laurence Gatt 

(Secretary. or other Title) 

25th February v" on this----- day of _____ ___.; ___ , "" 2015 

Albinati Aviation Ltd 

(Name of Company) 

By: STEFANO ATI. 

(President) 

0 

I
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ERIC HOPE , Appellant ,

v. Case No. 5D 16

- 4086
STATE OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Opinion filed December 22, 2017 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Or ange County , Marc L. Lubet , Judge. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Sean K. Gravel, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent

- Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

. We affirm the judgment and sentence entered against Eric Hope without
discussion but remand for correction of a scrivener' s error in the judgment. See Ashley
v. State , 850 So. 2d 1265, 1268 n. 3 (Fla. 2003) (defining scrivener's error as written
clerical error that is not " the result of a judicial determination or error" ). The judgment2

erroneously cites to section 782.07 , Florida Statutes (2015) , for the crime of burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery and a firearm when the correct statutory citation is
section 810.02(2) (a) , Florida Statutes (2015) , and erroneously cites to section 810.02(2) (a) for the crime of aggravated assault with a firearm when the correct citation is section 784.021(2) , Florida Statutes (2015)

. The judgment also erroneously lists the burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery and a firearm conviction as a second

degree felony when it is a life felony , and it lists the aggravated assault with a firearm
conviction as a life felony when it is a third

- degree felony. We therefore remand for
correction of the scrivener's errors

. In all other respects, we affirm. AFFIRMED; REMAN DED FOR CORRECTION OF SCRIVENER' S ERROR S

. SAWAYA , BERGER and LAMBERT , JJ., concur

.