T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he H onor abl e M y r on H . B r i ght , S e ni orU ni t e d S t a t e s C i r c ui tJudge ** f orthe E i ghth C i r c ui t , s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E N IN T H C IR C U IT B I N B I N Y AN G, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J R ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 06- 70104 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 708- 276 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls A r gue d and S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r6, 2009

P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia Be f o r e : BR I GH T, B Y B E E , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. ** B i n B i n Y ang, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of C hi na , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ o r d e ra f f irm in g a n im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s d e c is io n to



# FI LED DE C 01 2009 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

de nyhi s appl i c a t i on f

ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , a nd pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C o n v e n tio n A g a in s t T o rtu r e ( “C A T ” ) o n th e b a s is o f a d v e r s e c r e d ib ility de t e rm i na t i ons . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. A f t e rr e vi e w i ng the f a c tua l f i ndi ngs f ors ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e , s e e S i ngh v. G onz a l e s , 439 F . 3d 1100, 1 1 0 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) , w e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T h e r e c o r dd o e s n o t c o m p e l r e v e r s a l o f th e a d v e r s e c r e d ib ility det erm i nat i on s bec ause Y ang t es t i fi ed i ncon si st ent l y r egar di ng hi s c l ai m that f a m ilyp lan n in g au th o r itie s a tte m p te dto f o r c e h is f ian c é e to u n d e r g o a n ab o rtio n . S ee 8 U . S . C . § 1 15 8(b)(1)(B)(i i i ) ( prov i di ng thatun der the R E A L ID A ct , an i m m i gr a t i on j udge m ayba s e ac r e di bi l i tyde t e rm i na t i on on the c ons i s t e nc yof the ap p li ca n t’ s s tatem en ts, reg ar d less o f w h eth eritg o es to th e h ea rt o f th e ap p li ca n t’ s cl ai m ); K aur v. G on za l es , 41 8 F . 3d 10 61 , 10 67 (9th C i r. 20 05 ) ( i ncon si st enci es d ep ri v e an ap p l i can t ’ s t est i m o n y o f th e req u i si t e “ ri n g o f tru th ”). T h e reco rdal so e s tab lis h e s th a t Y an g d idn o t p r o v id e ac r e d ib le e x p lan a tio n f o rw h yh e f

a ile dto prov i de do cum ent ary e vi dence i n sup po rtof hi s c l ai m . S ee S i dhu v. I N S , 220 F . 3d 1085, 1091 n. 3 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( hol di ng tha ta n i m m i gr a t i on j udge c oul d de t e rm i ne th a t an ap p lic an t’s e x p lan a tio n f o rala c ko f

c o rr o b o r a tio n w a s n o t c r e d ib le ) . I n th e ab s e n c e o f

c r e d ib le te s tim o n y , Y an g f a ile dto d e m o n s tr a te e lig ib ility for a sy l um or w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al . S ee F ar ah v. A s hc r of t , 348 F . 3d 1153, 11563

( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 3 ) . Fu rth e rmo r e , b e c au s e Y an g ’ s CA T c l a i m r e l i e s o n th e s a me e v id e n c e th e im m ig r a tio n ju d g e f o u n dn o t c r e d ib le , an dh e d o e s n o t p o in t to a d d itio n a l e v id e n c e to s h o w it is m o r e lik e lyth an n o t th a t h e w o u ldb e to rtu r e dif he re turned t o C hi na, hi s C A T cl ai m fa i l s. S ee i d. a t1157. PETI TI O N FO R R EVI EW D EN I ED .