alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Hawai'i Geographic Society <hawaiigeographicsociety@gmail.com> 

Wednesday, November 27, 2013 6:25 PM 

EAS (OST) 

KALAUPAPA AIR SERVICE 

After several years of poor, expensive, irregular air travel possibilities to KALAUPAPA PENINSULA 

NATIONAL HISTORIC PARK, 

\_ji 

there is an opportunity with MOKULELE AIRLINES to have regular, scheduled, and on demand, air service 

with a reputable company 

which is interested in serving this important place in Hawai'i History. We support your favorable consideration 

of MOKULELE AIRLINES 

and its proposals of service the fares. 

Thank. you, 

Prof Willis H A Moore, Editor and Manager 

HAW AI'I GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY 

Established in 1947 as KIWANIS WORLD ADVENTURE TOUR SOCIETY, 

The HAW AI' I GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY continues to fulfill its VISION: 

THE DIFFUSION OF GEOGRAPHIC KNOWLEDGE CONCERNING HAWAIZ, THE 

PACIFIC ISLANDS AND RIM, AND THE WORLD. 

The H.G.S. MISSION: 

Publication and sale of maps of Hawai'i, the Pacific, and the world, 

Presenting of lectures and visual media programs for the public, 

Providing speakers and programs for clubs, classes, and groups, 

Leading Treks on O'ahu and other islands, 

Organizing tours and travel worldwide. 

www.toursbytrain.com- 808-528-4411 

www.tourvideos.com 

WORLD TRAVELER - a weekly travel program on 'Olelo - 528-4411 

*www. waquarium.org* 

O'ahu camping: camping.honolulu.gov 

PACIFIC ISLANDS: www.explorethepacific.com- 808-732-1999 

BIKE HA WAI'I TOURS: bikehawaii.com- 808-734-4214 

HAW AI'I TRAILS: www.alltrails.com 

STREET MAPS: openstreetmaps.org 

335 Merchant Street, #1698, HONOLULU, HAWAI'I 96806-0612 

1-800-538-3950 =USA/Canada I 1-808-538-3952 = O'ahu & worldwide 

1
# CE2004078EN.01083501.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/835 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/835

---

(2004/C 78 E/0888)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3614/03

by Esko Seppänen (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(5 December 2003)

Subject:   Cultivation of sweet rowanberries

Subject:

The Commission has exclusive competence for agricultural support. Hence this question: have the authorities of a Member State acted correctly in not allocating agricultural support to all farmers on the same basis but allocating it according to their place of residence? The Finnish authorities have not granted the appropriate support to farmers who cultivate sweet rowanberries in what the authorities consider to be the ‘wrong’ part of the country, i.e. in an area which is not a berry cultivation area. Are rowanberries which have been bred so as to make them sweet defined as berries or fruit?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(29 January 2004)

(29 January 2004)

Member States can as their priorities dictate subsidize particular crops provided that the aid is compatible with Community law. Up to now they have had to submit all such proposed aids to the Commission for clearance as compatible (see Community guidelines for State aid in the agriculture sector (1)). We have however recently adopted as part of the CAP reform a set of rules (2) under which Member States will be able to grant agricultural aids falling into certain categories without first having to request our approval. These block exemptions will speed up implementation of the new agricultural State aids and also facilitate implementation of the national programmes to raise environmental, animal welfare and hygiene standards in agriculture.

1

2

In the absence of precise information on the measure to which the Honourable Member refers we cannot comment on its compatibility with Community law.

On the question of whether the fruit (pihlajanmarja in Finnish) yielded by the rowan tree (Sorbus aucuparia) is a fruit or a berry, we consider that it is a berry and hence also a fruit, since berries are by definition also fruits.

---

(1)  OJ C 28, 1.2.2000.

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1/2004 of 23 December 2003 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of agricultural products, OJ L 1, 3.1.2004.

2

---
### Systems of Records Notices (SORNs)

A **System of Records Notice** is a document that notifies the public about the existence and character of a system maintained by a Federal agency that contains information about individuals. SORNs must be published in the Federal Register for all operational systems. All Federal agencies, including those in the Intelligence Community, are required to publish SORNs about all unclassified SORs maintained by the agency.

*Reference: Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Memorandum M-08-21, FY 2008 Reporting Instructions for the Federal Information Security Management Act and Agency Privacy Management, 14 July 2008.*

#### NRO System of Records Notices
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-41431

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SOLOMON EVERFIELD, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:01-CR-109-ALL

- - - - - - - - - -

August 2, 2002

Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Solomon

Everfield, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Everfield was notified of counsel’s motion, but has not

filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
No. 01-41431

-2-

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 10.25

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                    SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION RIGHTS AGREEMENT

Amendment No. 1 Dated as of September 15, 1998, between Ethicon, Inc.
("Ethicon"), a New Jersey corporation, and Closure Medical Corporation (formerly
known as Tri-Point Medical Corporation) ("Closure"), a Delaware corporation, to
that certain Supply and Distribution Rights Agreement dated as of March 20, 1996
between the parties.

                              Preliminary Statement
                              ---------------------

         Ethicon and Closure are parties to that certain Supply and Distribution
Rights Agreement dated as of March 20, 1996 (the "Supply Agreement"). The
parties desire to amend certain pricing terms and otherwise to continue the
Supply Agreement in effect in accordance with its terms.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

         Section I Minimum Price. Paragraph B.1. of Article IV of the Supply
                   -------------
Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the reference therein to "$**" and
inserting in lieu thereof "$**".

         Section 2 Adjustments to Minimum Price. Paragraph B.3. of Article IV of
                   ----------------------------
the Supply Agreement is hereby amended by deleting such current paragraph and
inserting the following in lieu thereof:

         Notwithstanding the minimum purchase price of $** set out in Paragraph
B.1. above (the "Minimum Purchase Price"), in the event that **.

Section 3 Effect on Supply Agreement. Except as expressly amended by this
          --------------------------
Amendment No. 1, the Supply Agreement shall continue in full force and effect in
accordance with its terms and this Amendment No. 1 shall be subject to such
terms.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto by their duly authorized representatives
have executed and delivered this Amendment No. 1 as of the date first above
written.

ETHICON, INC.                          CLOSURE MEDICAL CORPORATION
By: /s/ HOWARD ZAUBERMAN               By: /s/ ROBERT V. TONI
   -------------------------------         -------------------------------------
Name:    Howard Zauberman                  Name:    Robert V. Toni
Title:   Vice President of                 Title:   President and CEO
         New Business Development
99-968.

#### Owens v. Brigano.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus by Frank Floyd Owens. *Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ALLAIRE
CORPORATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          31,031
<SECURITIES>                                    25,745
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,960
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (570)
<INVENTORY>                                        172
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,345
<PP&E>                                           8,896
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,851)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,031
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,387
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           260
<OTHER-SE>                                     100,708
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,031
<SALES>                                         29,976
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,837
<CGS>                                            1,771
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,897
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 259
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,787)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,787)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,787)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)


</TABLE>
________ -·----=::-,-~~~--·...--..---- ~,-.--.~,"~-~~-REE~-ID~:.A5229B_4_-_~,__..,_~~~----------, 1 

SECRET 

8iGYRm' INF9RM1''fl8N 

FROll I:IRNSA 

TO SUSLO 

p, 2120232 

EXCLUS1VE FOR FRIEDMAN FROM CANINE~ 

-WI,.. 1002. 

IMPORTANT I.KNOW. BRITISH REACTION TO AFSAM 7 FOR COMaINEE 

AND NATO USE FURNISH INFORMATION YOU NOW HAVE OR CAN O~TAIN AT THIS TIME• 

· s _;_'., e T -

SECRET 

&fBHtlllf INftJfiMfffoti 

' ' -

eclassified and a roved for release b NSA on 05-21-2014 ursuant to E.O. 1352 

. 

-- -, 

- -·;'--<_~ ~ 

J - . 1 

i ' ,
EERE Information Center Search Help More Search Options

Printable Version 

## Residential Clothes Dryer and Room Air Conditioners Framework Document Public Meeting

Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) held a meeting to discuss the procedural and analytical approaches DOE anticipated using to evaluate energy conservation standards for residential clothes dryers and room air conditioners.
Some of the following documents are available as Adobe Acrobat PDFs. Download Adobe Reader

. 

### Public Meeting Materials Notice of public meeting and availability of the Framework Document ( PDF 76 KB ) PLEASE NOTE: The correct date for submitting comments to this document is November 7, 2007, not October 3, 2007, as listed in the notice. Framework Document ( PDF 740 KB ) Agenda ( PDF 26 KB ) Presentation ( PDF 731 KB ) Transcript ( PDF 302 KB )



### Contact Information Stephen Witkowski , P.E. Project Manager (202) 586-7436

Printable Version

DATE: October 24, 2007 TIME: 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. EDT LOCATION: Holiday Inn Capital 550 C Street SW Washington, DC 

### Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Residential Clothes D... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/c...

1 of 2 7/16/2009 2:43 P MBuilding Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy| USA.gov

Content Last Updated: 07/01/2009 

### Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Residential Clothes D... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/c...

2 of 2 7/16/2009 2:43 P M
#### Grue, Respondent, vs. Allen, Appellant.

*February 6*

February *24, 1903.*

*Nelson v. Allen, ante,*p. 91, followed.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for St. Croix county: E. W. Helms, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*97Eor the appellant there was a brief by *Harold Harris*and *T. M. Thorson,*and oral argument by *Mr. Harris.*

Eor the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of *William N. Fuller.*

Cassoday, C. J.

This case is substantially the same as the case of *Nelson v.*Allen, *ante,*p. 91, 93 N. W. 807. It is for a rescission of the written contract which the plaintiff, through his agent, Jacob B. Nelson, entered into with the defendant December 7, 1899, for the other 100 acres of timbered land mentioned in the statement of facts in that case, but which were not described in the contract in this case, and by fraud and false representations other and different lands of much inferior quality and less valuable were described in the written contract to the plaintiff herein. For the reasons given in the other case, the judgment in this pase is affirmed.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-26-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-26-1995
<CASH>                                          21,008
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,875
<ALLOWANCES>                                       154
<INVENTORY>                                     27,176
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,239
<PP&E>                                          49,803
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,163
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 108,687
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,393
<BONDS>                                         31,453
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,175
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,024
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   108,687
<SALES>                                         42,470
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,051
<CGS>                                           31,429
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,429
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,139
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,399
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,084
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,234
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,850
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,850
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16

</TABLE>
### SEP 2 3 2022 No. 85354

• LEPK fr. SP".nAIN OURT

• t• INTHE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ORDERDISMISSINGAPPEAL This is a pro se appeal. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; EricJohnson, Judge.

Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, appellant fails to identify any appealable order. Accordingly, this court

ORDERSthis appeal DISMISSED.1

, J.

Cadish

'Given this dismissal, this court takes no action in regard to the documents filed by appellant on September 28, 2022. The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in this matter under a general order ofassignment. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 101 1947A , J.

MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON, Appellant, vs. BRIAN P. CLARK, Respondent.cc: Hon. Eric Johnson, District Judge Matthew Travis Houston ClarkMcCourt, LLC Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
(4 )1 J,L17A
USCIB: 9 .J/29 

REF ID:A57~16 

• 

4 March 1955 

MEMORAND1D4 FOR THE 1"'..EMBERS OF USCIBEC: 

Subject: Classification or USCIB 9.J/28 ot 28 February 1955. 

In view of the classification of related material as SECRET, subject 

paper is c)onsidered not to warrant the TOP SECRET classification and is 

therefore downgraded to SECRET. 

Complett3d 8 Mar, 55 

tarl 

USCIB: 9 .3/29 

C tain, • • Navy 

ecutive Secretary, USCIB 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-17-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

24
BEBRET 

8E8tf ftlfY lrtfefttlAflON ~-

_:Jl!TE: 22 OCTOBER 1953 

FROM SUSLO 

DRAFTED BY MR FRIEDMAN 

RELEASED BY COL PULLING 

SECTION EXT 

OUTGOING 

NAVAL M~SSAG~ 

ADDRESSEE(S) 

z 

...... 

0 DIRNSA 

E-1 

u 

-< 

z 

0 

....... 

E-1 

< ::s 

i:::i::: 

0 

~ 

z 

...... 

UNCLASSIFIED 

PRECEDENCE 

FLASH 

EMERGENCY 

OPERATIONAL 

IMMEDIATE 

·P )PRiORITY .. 

l ROUTINE 

. 1--tg.\SH I EMERGENCY 

t OPEllA'I'lONAL 

ORITY 

UTINE 

' . . 

i 

' 

~---

~EOIATE 

------ UNLESS OTHERWIS~ INDICATED, THIS ME~~~GE~~l!~ TRA~SMI~~D W!'.fH DEFERRED PRECF.!D~!SCE 

221127Z 

ROUTING INSTRUCTIONS DATE/TIME GROUP (GCT} 

XX SEGAET XX 

EXCLUSIVE FOR GENERAL CANINE FROM FRIEDMAN 

LW 1080. 

(DO NOT USE THIS SPACE) 

REPLYING WL 1002, ALL THBEE BRITISH SERVICES HAVE APPROVED AFSAM 7. 

BRIEISH RECOGNIZE THAT THERE REMAIN SOME QUESTIONS AS TO EXACT FORM 

OR FORMS OF EMBODIMENT OF ADONIS PRINCIPLE1 BUT ARE ENTHUSIASTIC FOR 

ADOPTION OF THAT PRINCIPLE FOR COMBINED AND FOR NATO USE. HENCE ITEM 

ANTICIPATE NO DIFFICULTY IN REACHING AGREEMENT WITH THEM ON THESE POINTS 

WHEN BROUGHT UP DURING FORMAL SESSIONS OPENING NEXT WEEK. 

I 

SUSLO/MR FRIEDMAN/COMM 

ORIGINATOR: 

COPIES: SECRET 

8fC111lJn IRFORMAl ION 

DATE/TIME GROUP UNCLASSIFIED 

- - --- - · -- ----Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-21-2014 pursuant to E .0. 13526 -- - ------
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  Exhibit 21
 
                     LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 
1. Data Translation Ltd
   Basingstoke, Hants
   England
 
2. Data Translation GmbH
   Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany
EXHIBIT 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)
 
 (i)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2010
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the
periods indicated.
 Date:  February 10, 2011
    
    /s/ JOSEPH CARLEONEJoseph CarleonePresident and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
Summit Technology, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 33-      ) on Form S-8 of Summit Technology, Inc., of our report dated
        ------
March 6, 1998, except as to Note 10, which is as of March 27, 1998 and except
for the restatement referred to in Note 18, as to which the date is March 9,
1999 relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Summit Technology, Inc., and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows and related schedules for each
of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 1997, which report
appears in this current report on Form 10-K of Summit Technology, Inc., dated
March 31, 1999.


                                        /s/ KPMG LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
June 25, 1999
LL 

. Approved for Release: 2017/08/17 COS099930:' 

, i.". ,,')~,_ 

:; 1 t 

1- \ ---, 

, < 

0"1'· 1 

J ...... 

Approved for Release: 2017/08/17 COS099930 
" ; ',- .-;'." ',. :: " .-,,>' 

iApproved for Release: 2017/08/17 COS099930 .. ,;;;- '.~ :-<'. ',,:;,:"";.,:;, ,; "" '~"'J'-';>'.""<:'" 

( 1 ,'hK)i.U 

(1) 1, [h? 

25X1 

t 1'1 r ()ltl;l 1 L 

2 i:5 F' e [).T 1.1 ,=.\ .'~~ ~:/ 

, Approved for Release: 2017/08/17 COS099930