alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w27







	 	 	 	 	 



EXHIBIT
10.27




TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Summary Sheet as of September 9, 2008



On September 9, 2008 the Board of Directors revised the compensation of directors effective that
day.



Each director of the Company who is not a compensated officer or employee of the Company will
receive cash compensation as follows:





	 	•	 	Board member annual retainer of $50,000
	 
	 	•	 	Presiding Director — annual retainer of $5,000
	 
	 	•	 	Board meeting fee — $2,000 for each meeting attended
	 
	 	•	 	Ad Hoc Consultancy or Special Assignment as approved by the Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer and President — $2,000 per day
	 
	 	•	 	Audit Committee Chairman — annual retainer of $15,000
	 
	 	•	 	Member of the Audit Committee — $2,000 for each meeting attended
	 
	 	•	 	Human Resources Committee Chairman — annual retainer of $7,500
	 
	 	•	 	Chairman of other Board Committees — annual retainer of $5,000
	 
	 	•	 	Member of other Board Committees — $1,500 for each meeting attended




The Board has a cash equivalent value for annual equity compensation for directors of $100,000 and
will use a twelve month average share price as the basis for the awards.
Order entered December 21, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00663-CR

No. 05-18-00670-CR

JONATHAN TYRONE MCKELLER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 380-81748-2017 & 380-80769-2017

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was initially due October 25, 2018. After we granted an extension, it 

was due November 30, 2018. To date, no brief has been filed and we have had no 

communication from appellant about the brief or the appeals.

Therefore, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute these appeals or whether 

appellant has abandoned the appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain 

appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s 

absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per 
curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be 

necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Benjamin Smith, 

Presiding Judge, 380th Judicial District Court; Kristin Brown; and to the Collin County District 

Attorney.

These appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeals shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
~8452 

USCIB: 4.2/33 

24 

20 December 1954 

MEU:QRANl)Ull FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

' 

Subject: Revision or USCIB Directive No. 5. 

Reference: USCIB 4.2/311 dated l December 1954 

l. The reterence 1 which reported a decision by USCIBEC approving a 

revision of USCIB Directive No. 51 has now been approved by USCIB. 

2. Accordingly1 there is forwarded herewith a new "page 111 of 

Directive No. 5 containing the approved revision. It is requested that 

the enclosure be substituted f'or the original "page 111

1 which should be 

destroyed. 

3. Additional copies of the enclosure are available from this 

o.f.'.f.'ice upon request. 

4. This document may be downgraded to CONFIDENTIAL upon detachment of the enclosure. 

Enclosure 

·a/s 

USCIB: 4.2/33 

USCIB 

SECRET 
.. REFSfiffiila 452 

USCIB STANDARDS AND PROCEDURE FOR CLEARANCE OF PERSONNEL FOR C:CMINT 

1. Provisions of this Directive are applicable to persons being considered for clearance and access to Category III and Category II CCMINT. 

Min:imum investigation and clearance standards for access to Category I 

COM.INT will be in accordance with each USCIB member's existing clearance 

procedures for access to classified materials of the same classification. 

The elements of the procedure for clearing a person for Communications 

Intelligence (CCMINT) are, consecutively: 

a. Determination of the "need to know". 

b. Investigation, and evaluation in terms of USCIB clearance 

standards. 

c. Approval for indoctrination. 

d. Indoctrination (and debriefing). 

2. DETERMINATION OF THE "NEED TO KNOW". 

a. The "need to know" exists only when a knowledge or COMINT is 

essential to a person !or the performance of his official duties. 

The number of persons cleared for COMINT will be held to the 

essential minimum. 

b. The responsibility for determining the "need .:to know" of persons 

in the performance of duties under the direct cognizance and 

supervision of a USCIB member department or agency rests with 

that USCIB member department or agency, which shall act in full 

coordination with any other member department or agency concerned 

with such determination. 

- 1 -

SECRET
# CE2004084EN.01032602.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/326 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/326

---

(2004/C 84 E/0384)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0175/04

by Christopher Heaton-Harris (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(29 January 2004)

Subject:   Commission's accounting systems

Subject:

I understand the Internal Audit Service, in a report entitled ‘IAS Review of the Commission's Accounting Framework — Final Report’ dated 15 April 2003, made a number of recommendations to the Commission regarding the accounting systems.

Could the Commission confirm that it will be using a balance sheet to show long-term assets available for covering a long-term debt, including the fund regarding the sickness insurance scheme?

---
**EXHIBIT
      32**











**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Premier Financial Bancorp, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
      Robert W. Walker and Brien M. Chase, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our
      knowledge:





o
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
                and





o
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








By:
      /s/ Robert W. Walker


---------------------------------------


Robert
      W. Walker


President
      and Chief Executive Officer








By:
      /s/ Brien M. Chase


---------------------------------------


Brien
      M. Chase


Vice
      President and Chief Financial Officer





Date:
      March 30, 2007
Non-Cooking Mode Features Incorporated in Ranges on The Market in the U.S.

Delayed Start Self-Clean Mode Sabbath Mode

Gas 24 out of 33 24 out of 33 25 out of 33

Electric 60 out of 74 59 out of 74 50 out of 74

Dual Fuel 3 of 3 3 of 3 3 of 3

Delay Start Self-Clean Sabbath

Totals: 87 of 110 86 of 110 78 of110

79% 78% 71%
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,691
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,585
<ALLOWANCES>                                       282
<INVENTORY>                                      2,293
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,692
<PP&E>                                          43,931
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,323
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,383
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,828
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           131
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,273
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,383
<SALES>                                         16,287
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,929
<CGS>                                            4,589
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,028
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,576
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  79
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,666
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,438
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,666
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,228
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information from condensed financial
statements for the period ending July 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000350403
<NAME> GEOFF STANFORD
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,014
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     36,466
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,192
<PP&E>                                         266,488
<DEPRECIATION>                                 123,753
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 228,893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,634
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           516
<OTHER-SE>                                      96,336
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   228,893
<SALES>                                         53,814
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,675
<CGS>                                           51,535
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,535
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,435
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    863
<INCOME-TAX>                                       328
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                535
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       535
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32**

 

 

**WINTHROP RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATES I, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP**

**FORM 10-QSB SEPTEMBER 30, 2004**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

                In connection with the Quarterly Report of WinthropResidential Associates I, A Limited Partnership, (the “Partnership”), on Form10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, herebycertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 
| Date: November  10, 2004 |   |   | /s/ Michael L.  Ashner   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------|
|                     |   |   | Michael L.  Ashner       |
|                     |   |   | Chief Executive  Officer |
|                     |   |   |                     |   |   |   |   |
| Date: November  10, 2004 |   |   | /s/ Thomas C.  Staples   |
|                     |   |   | Thomas C.  Staples       |
|                     |   |   | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

 

16

----
#### Howard, Plaintiff in error, vs. The State, Defendant in error.

*January 28*—

February *18, 1902.*

*Criminal law and, practice: Supreme court: Appointment of counsel for indigent persons.*

Sec. 4713, Stats. 1898, directing payment from the county treasury of counsel, appointed hy order of court to defend indigent persons charged with a crime, confers no authority upon the supreme court to make such appointment, and application for that purpose will be denied.

MotioN under see. 4-713, Stats. 1898, to appoint counsel to prosecute a writ of error.

*Motion denied.*

*John H. Brennan,*for tbe plaintiff in error.

. For tbe defendant in error there was a brief by tbe *Attorney*General, and oral argument by *B. F. Hamilton,*second assistant attorney general.

*249Pee Cueiam.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of assault with intent to kill, and was sentenced to imprisonment at Waupun. He had no means, and counsel was appointed to defend him in the trial court, but the appointment was limited to the trial term. A writ of error was sued out of this court, and a motion made in the trial court that counsel be appointed to represent the accused in this court, which motion was denied, although it was admitted that the plaintiff in error was still destitute of means. *<*Motion is now made in this court that counsel be appointed to prosecute the writ of error.

It has been deliberately held by this court in at least two recent eases not only that this court will not appoint counsel for indigent persons charged with crime, but that sec. 4113, Stats. 1898, confers no such power upon this court. However'we might be inclined to view the question, were it an original proposition, we do not feel inclined to change a rule which has become so well settled. *McDonald v. State,*80 Wis. 407; *Baker v. State,*84 Wis. 584.

Motion denied.’
# CE2004084EN.01033202.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/332 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/332

---

(2004/C 84 E/0390)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0210/04

by Markus Ferber (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(30 January 2004)

Subject:   Language discrimination in job advertisements

Subject:

A number of magazines repeatedly publish job advertisements seeking to recruit applicants with English as their mother tongue, although the jobs are within EU institutions or at consultancy firms focusing on European policy. Particular emphasis is placed on linguistic background as a criterion for recruitment (‘English mother tongue’/‘native English speaker’: examples can be seen at www.lingvo.org/eo/2/15). These advertisements discriminate against applicants with equivalent professional qualifications and a very good knowledge of English, but whose mother tongue is not English.

Discrimination of this kind on the basis of linguistic background is expressly prohibited under Article 21 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.

Can the Commission therefore answer the following questions:

| 1. | What steps has the Commission taken to prevent such discrimination? |
| --- | --- |

1.

What steps has the Commission taken to prevent such discrimination?

| 2. | Is the Commission considering including a ban on discrimination on the grounds of linguistic background in the Community action programme to combat discrimination (Council Decision No 2000/750/EC of 27 November 2000)? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is the Commission considering including a ban on discrimination on the grounds of linguistic background in the Community action programme to combat discrimination (Council Decision No 2000/750/EC of 27 November 2000)?

---
IC 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1461 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the 

Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

AN ACT 

To provide for the extension of the enforcement instruction 

on supervision requirements for outpatient therapeutic 

services in critical access and small rural hospitals 

through 2015. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

S 1461 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ENFORCEMENT INSTRUCTION 

2 ON SUPERVISION REQUIREMENTS FOR OUT3 PATIENT THERAPEUTIC SERVICES IN CRIT4 ICAL ACCESS AND SMALL RURAL HOSPITALS 

5 THROUGH 2015. 

6 Section 1 of Public Law 113–198 is amended— 

7 (1) in the section heading, by inserting ‘‘AND

8 2015’’ after ‘‘2014’’; and 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘calendar year 2014’’ and in10 serting ‘‘calendar years 2014 and 2015’’. 

Passed the Senate September 10, 2015. 

Attest: JULIE E. ADAMS, 

Secretary. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 14, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50946 Summary Calendar

ANNA MARIE VASQUEZ Plaintiff - Appellant

v. YSLETA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Defendant - Appellee

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-02-CV-313-PRM

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Anna M. Vasquez filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Ysleta Independent School District (School District) alleging that she was deprived of her contract right to employment as a teacher for the 2002-2003 school year without due process in violation of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. The magistrate judge granted summary judgment in favor of theNo. 03-50946 -2- School District because there was no genuine factual dispute that Vasquez had a protected property interest in continued employment by operation of T EX . E DUC . C ODE Ann. § 21.103(a). The record contains no evidence creating a dispute that the School District failed to give Vasquez adequate notice of termination as required by § 21.103(a). Having reviewed de novo the order granting summary judgment, this court finds no error. See F ED . R. C IV . P. 56(c); Whittaker v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. , 206 F.3d 532, 534 (5th Cir. 2000); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett , 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986).
AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of HEI, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony J. Fant,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                       /s/ ANTHONY J. FANT
                                       -----------------------------------------

                                       Anthony J. Fant
                                       Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Date: January 14, 2003


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of HEI, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve E. Tondera, Jr.,
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Vice President Finance and Secretary of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                       /s/ STEVE E. TONDERA, JR.
                                       -----------------------------------------

                                       Steve E. Tondera, Jr.
                                       Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Vice
                                       President Finance and Secretary
Date: January 14, 2003