11166 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Notices 

4See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). 

1See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; 

Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 

39263 (July 6, 2011). 

part 351 of the Department’s regulations 

expires, or as otherwise specified by the 

Secretary. In general, an extension 

request will be considered untimely if it 

is filed after the time limit established 

under part 351 expires. For submissions 

which are due from multiple parties 

simultaneously, an extension request 

will be considered untimely if it is filed 

after 10:00 a.m. on the due date. Under 

certain circumstances, the Department 

may elect to specify a different time 

limit by which extension requests will 

be considered untimely for submissions 

which are due from multiple parties 

simultaneously. In such a case, the 

Department will inform parties in the 

letter or memorandum setting forth the 

deadline (including a specified time) by 

which extension requests must be filed 

to be considered timely. This 

modification also requires that an 

extension request must be made in a 

separate, stand-alone submission, and 

clarifies the circumstances under which 

the Department will grant untimelyfiled requests for the extension of time 

limits. These modifications are effective 

for all segments initiated on or after 

October 21, 2013. Review the final rule, 

available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/

pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013- 

22853.htm, prior to submitting factual 

information in these segments. 

Letters of Appearance and 

Administrative Protective Orders 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d), the 

Department will maintain and make 

available a public service list for these 

proceedings. Parties wishing to 

participate in any of these five-year 

reviews must file letters of appearance 

as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). To 

facilitate the timely preparation of the 

public service list, it is requested that 

those seeking recognition as interested 

parties to a proceeding submit an entry 

of appearance within 10 days of the 

publication of the Notice of Initiation. 

Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews 

can be very short, we urge interested 

parties who want access to proprietary 

information under administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) to file an APO 

application immediately following 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this notice of initiation. The 

Department’s regulations on submission 

of proprietary information and 

eligibility to receive access to business 

proprietary information under APO can 

be found at 19 CFR 351.304–306. 

Information Required From Interested 

Parties 

Domestic interested parties, as 

defined in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), 

and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.102(b), wishing to participate in a 

Sunset Review must respond not later 

than 15 days after the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this notice of initiation by filing a notice 

of intent to participate. The required 

contents of the notice of intent to 

participate are set forth at 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with the 

Department’s regulations, if we do not 

receive a notice of intent to participate 

from at least one domestic interested 

party by the 15-day deadline, the 

Department will automatically revoke 

the order without further review.4

If we receive an order-specific notice 

of intent to participate from a domestic 

interested party, the Department’s 

regulations provide that all parties 

wishing to participate in a Sunset 

Review must file complete substantive 

responses not later than 30 days after 

the date of publication in the Federal 

Register of this notice of initiation. The 

required contents of a substantive 

response, on an order-specific basis, are 

set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note 

that certain information requirements 

differ for respondent and domestic 

parties. Also, note that the Department’s 

information requirements are distinct 

from the Commission’s information 

requirements. Consult the Department’s 

regulations for information regarding 

the Department’s conduct of Sunset 

Reviews. Consult the Department’s 

regulations at 19 CFR part 351 for 

definitions of terms and for other 

general information concerning 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

proceedings at the Department. 

This notice of initiation is being 

published in accordance with section 

751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c). 

Dated: February 23, 2015. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2015–04300 Filed 2–27–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘the Department’’) has received 

requests to conduct administrative 

reviews of various antidumping and 

countervailing duty orders and findings 

with January anniversary dates. In 

accordance with the Department’s 

regulations, we are initiating those 

administrative reviews. 

DATES: Effective March 2, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD 

Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 

482–4735. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department has received timely 

requests, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b), for administrative reviews of 

various antidumping and countervailing 

duty orders and findings with January 

anniversary dates. 

All deadlines for the submission of 

various types of information, 

certifications, or comments or actions by 

the Department discussed below refer to 

the number of calendar days from the 

applicable starting time. 

Notice of No Sales 

If a producer or exporter named in 

this notice of initiation had no exports, 

sales, or entries during the period of 

review (‘‘POR’’), it must notify the 

Department within 30 days of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. All submissions must be filed 

electronically at http://access.trade.gov 

in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303.1

Such submissions are subject to 

verification in accordance with section 

782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’). Further, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(1)(i), 

a copy must be served on every party on 

the Department’s service list. 

Respondent Selection 

In the event the Department limits the 

number of respondents for individual 

examination for administrative reviews, 

the Department intends to select 

respondents based on U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S. 

imports during the POR. We intend to 

release the CBP data under 

Administrative Protective Order 

(‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO 

within seven days of publication of this 

initiation notice and to make our 

decision regarding respondent selection 

within 21 days of publication of this 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Notices 11167 

Federal Register notice. The 

Department invites comments regarding 

the CBP data and respondent selection 

within five days of placement of the 

CBP data on the record of the applicable 

review. Rebuttal comments will be due 

five days after submission of initial 

comments. 

In the event the Department decides 

it is necessary to limit individual 

examination of respondents and 

conduct respondent selection under 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: 

In general, the Department has found 

that determinations concerning whether 

particular companies should be 

‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single 

entity for purposes of calculating 

antidumping duty rates) require a 

substantial amount of detailed 

information and analysis, which often 

require follow-up questions and 

analysis. Accordingly, the Department 

will not conduct collapsing analyses at 

the respondent selection phase of this 

review and will not collapse companies 

at the respondent selection phase unless 

there has been a determination to 

collapse certain companies in a 

previous segment of this antidumping 

proceeding (i.e., investigation, 

administrative review, new shipper 

review or changed circumstances 

review). For any company subject to this 

review, if the Department determined, 

or continued to treat, that company as 

collapsed with others, the Department 

will assume that such companies 

continue to operate in the same manner 

and will collapse them for respondent 

selection purposes. Otherwise, the 

Department will not collapse companies 

for purposes of respondent selection. 

Parties are requested to (a) identify 

which companies subject to review 

previously were collapsed, and (b) 

provide a citation to the proceeding in 

which they were collapsed. Further, if 

companies are requested to complete 

the Quantity and Value (‘‘Q&V’’) 

Questionnaire for purposes of 

respondent selection, in general each 

company must report volume and value 

data separately for itself. Parties should 

not include data for any other party, 

even if they believe they should be 

treated as a single entity with that other 

party. If a company was collapsed with 

another company or companies in the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding where the Department 

considered collapsing that entity, 

complete Q&V data for that collapsed 

entity must be submitted. 

Respondent Selection—Wooden 

Bedroom Furniture From the PRC 

In the event that the Department 

limits the number of respondents for 

individual examination in the 

antidumping duty administrative review 

of wooden bedroom furniture from the 

PRC, for the purposes of this segment of 

the proceeding, i.e., the 2014 review 

period, the Department intends to select 

respondents based on volume data 

contained in responses to a Q&V 

questionnaire. All parties are hereby 

notified that they must timely respond 

to the Q&V questionnaire. The 

Department’s Q&V questionnaire along 

with the Separate Rate Application, 

Separate Rate Certification, and certain 

additional questions will be available in 

a document package on the 

Department’s Web site at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/download/prcwbf/ on the date this notice is 

published. The responses to the Q&V 

questionnaire should be filed with the 

respondents’ Separate Rate Application 

or Separate Rate Certification and their 

response to the additional questions and 

must be received by the Department by 

no later than 30 days after publication 

of this notice. Please be advised that due 

to the time constraints imposed by the 

statutory and regulatory deadlines for 

antidumping duty administrative 

reviews, the Department does not intend 

to grant any extensions for the 

submission of responses to the Q&V 

questionnaire. 

Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for 

Administrative Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a 

party that has requested a review may 

withdraw that request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. The 

regulation provides that the Department 

may extend this time if it is reasonable 

to do so. In order to provide parties 

additional certainty with respect to 

when the Department will exercise its 

discretion to extend this 90-day 

deadline, interested parties are advised 

that the Department does not intend to 

extend the 90-day deadline unless the 

requestor demonstrates that an 

extraordinary circumstance has 

prevented it from submitting a timely 

withdrawal request. Determinations by 

the Department to extend the 90-day 

deadline will be made on a case-by-case 

basis. 

Separate Rates 

In proceedings involving non-market 

economy (‘‘NME’’) countries, the 

Department begins with a rebuttable 

presumption that all companies within 

the country are subject to government 

control and, thus, should be assigned a 

single antidumping duty deposit rate. It 

is the Department’s policy to assign all 

exporters of merchandise subject to an 

administrative review in an NME 

country this single rate unless an 

exporter can demonstrate that it is 

sufficiently independent so as to be 

entitled to a separate rate. 

To establish whether a firm is 

sufficiently independent from 

government control of its export 

activities to be entitled to a separate 

rate, the Department analyzes each 

entity exporting the subject 

merchandise under a test arising from 

the Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value: Sparklers From the 

People’s Republic of China, 56 FR 20588 

(May 6, 1991), as amplified by Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value: Silicon Carbide From the 

People’s Republic of China, 59 FR 22585 

(May 2, 1994). In accordance with the 

separate rates criteria, the Department 

assigns separate rates to companies in 

NME cases only if respondents can 

demonstrate the absence of both de jure 

and de facto government control over 

export activities. 

All firms listed below that wish to 

qualify for separate rate status in the 

administrative reviews involving NME 

countries must complete, as 

appropriate, either a separate rate 

application or certification, as described 

below. In addition, all firms that wish 

to qualify for separate-rate status in the 

antidumping duty administrative review 

of wooden bedroom furniture from the 

PRC must complete, as appropriate, 

either a separate-rate certification or 

application, as described below, and 

respond to the additional questions and 

the Q&V questionnaire which are 

included along with the separate-rate 

certification and application in a 

document package on the Department’s 

Web site at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/download/prcwbf/. For these administrative reviews, 

in order to demonstrate separate rate 

eligibility, the Department requires 

entities for whom a review was 

requested, that were assigned a separate 

rate in the most recent segment of this 

proceeding in which they participated, 

to certify that they continue to meet the 

criteria for obtaining a separate rate. The 

Separate Rate Certification form will be 

available on the Department’s Web site 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/nme/

nme-sep-rate.html on the date of 

publication of this Federal Register 

notice. For the antidumping duty 

administrative review of wooden 

bedroom furniture from the PRC, the 

Separate Rate Certification form will be 

available at the Web site address noted 

above for the document package. In 

responding to the certification, please 

follow the ‘‘Instructions for Filing the 

Certification’’ in the Separate Rate 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
11168 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Notices 

2Such entities include entities that have not 

participated in the proceeding, entities that were 

preliminarily granted a separate rate in any 

currently incomplete segment of the proceeding 

(e.g., an ongoing administrative review, new 

shipper review, etc.) and entities that lost their 

separate rate in the most recently completed 

segment of the proceeding in which they 

participated. 

3Only changes to the official company name, 

rather than trade names, need to be addressed via 

a Separate Rate Application. Information regarding 

new trade names may be submitted via a Separate 

Rate Certification. 

Certification. Separate Rate 

Certifications are due to the Department 

no later than 30 calendar days after 

publication of this Federal Register 

notice. For the antidumping duty 

administrative review of wooden 

bedroom furniture from the PRC, 

Separate Rate Certifications, as well as 

a response to the Q&V questionnaire 

and the additional questions in the 

document package, are due to the 

Department no later than 30 calendar 

days after publication of this Federal 

Register notice. The deadline and 

requirement for submitting a 

Certification applies equally to NMEowned firms, wholly foreign-owned 

firms, and foreign sellers who purchase 

and export subject merchandise to the 

United States. 

Entities that currently do not have a 

separate rate from a completed segment 

of the proceeding 2 should timely file a 

Separate Rate Application to 

demonstrate eligibility for a separate 

rate in this proceeding. In addition, 

companies that received a separate rate 

in a completed segment of the 

proceeding that have subsequently 

made changes, including, but not 

limited to, changes to corporate 

structure, acquisitions of new 

companies or facilities, or changes to 

their official company name,3 should 

timely file a Separate Rate Application 

to demonstrate eligibility for a separate 

rate in this proceeding. The Separate 

Rate Status Application will be 

available on the Department’s Web site 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/nme/

nme-sep-rate.html on the date of 

publication of this Federal Register 

notice. For the antidumping duty 

administrative review of wooden 

bedroom furniture from the PRC, the 

Separate Rate Status Application will be 

available at the Web site address noted 

above for the document package. In 

responding to the Separate Rate Status 

Application, refer to the instructions 

contained in the application. Separate 

Rate Status Applications are due to the 

Department no later than 30 calendar 

days of publication of this Federal 

Register notice. For the antidumping 

duty administrative review of wooden 

bedroom furniture from the PRC, 

Separate Rate Status Applications, as 

well as a response to the Q&V 

questionnaire and the additional 

questions in the document package, are 

due to the Department no later than 30 

calendar days after publication of this 

Federal Register notice. The deadline 

and requirement for submitting a 

Separate Rate Status Application 

applies equally to NME-owned firms, 

wholly foreign-owned firms, and foreign 

sellers that purchase and export subject 

merchandise to the United States. 

For exporters and producers who 

submit a separate-rate status application 

or certification and subsequently are 

selected as mandatory respondents, 

these exporters and producers will no 

longer be eligible for separate rate status 

unless they respond to all parts of the 

questionnaire as mandatory 

respondents. 

Furthermore, this notice constitutes 

public notification to all firms for which 

an antidumping duty administrative 

review of wooden bedroom furniture 

has been requested, and that are seeking 

separate rate status in the review, that 

they must submit a timely separate rate 

application or certification (as 

appropriate) as described above, and a 

timely response to the Q&V 

questionnaire and the additional 

questions in the document package on 

the Department’s Web site in order to 

receive consideration for separate-rate 

status. In other words, the Department 

will not give consideration to any timely 

separate rate certification or application 

made by parties who failed to respond 

in a timely manner to the Q&V 

questionnaire and the additional 

questions. All information submitted by 

respondents in the antidumping duty 

administrative review of wooden 

bedroom furniture from the PRC is 

subject to verification. As noted above, 

the separate rate certification, the 

separate rate application, the Q&V 

questionnaire, and the additional 

questions will be available in a 

document package on the Department’s 

Web site on the date of publication of 

this notice in the Federal Register. 

Initiation of Reviews 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i), we are initiating 

administrative reviews of the following 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

orders and findings. We intend to issue 

the final results of these reviews not 

later than January 31, 2016. 

Period of review 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings 

The People’s Republic of China: Potassium Permanganate A–570–001 .................................................................................... 1/1/14–12/31/14 

Pacific Accelerator Limited 

The People’s Republic of China: Multilayered Wood Flooring 4 A–570–970 ................................................................................ 12/1/13–11/30/14 

Dalian Dajen Wood Co., Ltd.5

Jiangsu Mingle Flooring Co., Ltd.6

Linyi Youyou Wood Co., Ltd.7

The People’s Republic of China: Wooden Bedroom Furniture A–570–890 ................................................................................. 1/1/14–12/31/14 

Art Heritage International, Ltd., Super Art Furniture Co., Ltd., Artwork Metal & Plastic Co., Ltd., Jibson Industries Ltd., 

Always Loyal International 

Baigou Crafts Factory Of Fengkai 

Balanza Co., Ltd. 

Best King International Ltd. 

Billionworth Enterprises Ltd. 

BNBM Co. Ltd. (aka Beijing New Materials Co., Ltd.) 

Brittomart Inc. 

C.F. Kent Co., Inc. 

C.F. Kent Hospitality, Inc. 

Changshu Htc Import & Export Co., Ltd. 

Cheng Meng Furniture (PTE) Ltd., Cheng Meng Decoration & Furniture (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. 

Chuan Fa Furniture Factory 

Classic Furniture Global Co., Ltd. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Notices 11169 

Period of review 

Clearwise Co., Ltd. 

Dalian Guangming Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Dalian Huafeng Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Dalian Huafeng Furniture Group Co., Ltd. 

Decca Furniture Ltd. 

Der Cheng Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Der Cheng Wooden Works Of Factory 

Dongguan Bon Ten Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Dongguan Chengcheng Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Dongguan Dong He Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Dongguan Fortune Furniture Ltd. 

Dongguan Grand Style Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Dongguan Hung Sheng Artware Products Co., Ltd., Coronal Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

Dongguan Kingstone Furniture Co., Ltd., Kingstone Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Dongguan Lung Dong Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Dongguan Mingsheng Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Dongguan Mu Si Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Dongguan Nova Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Dongguan Singways Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Dongguan Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd., Taicang Sunrise Wood Industry Co., Ltd., Taicang Fairmount Designs Furniture 

Co., Ltd., Meizhou Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Dongguan Sunshine Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Dongguan Yujia Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Dongying Huanghekou Furniture Industry Co., Ltd. 

Dorbest Ltd., Rui Feng Woodwork Co., Ltd. Aka Rui Feng Woodwork (Dongguan) Co., Ltd., Rui Feng Lumber Development Co., Ltd. Aka Rui Feng Lumber Development (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. 

Dream Rooms Furniture (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 

Eurosa (Kunshan) Co., Ltd., Eurosa Furniture Co., (Pte) Ltd. 

Fairmont Designs 

Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd. 

Fleetwood Fine Furniture LP 

Fortune Furniture Ltd. 

Fortune Glory Industrial Ltd. (H.K. Ltd.), Tradewinds Furniture Ltd. 

Fuijian Lianfu Forestry Co., Ltd. aka Fujian Wonder Pacific Inc. 

Fuzhou Huan Mei Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Golden Well International (HK) Ltd. 

Guangdong New Four Seas Furniture Manufacturing Ltd. 

Guangzhou Lucky Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Guangzhou Maria Yee Furnishings Ltd., Pyla HK Ltd., Maria Yee, Inc. 

Hainan Jong Bao Lumber Co., Ltd. 

Haining Kareno Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Hang Hai Woodcraft’s Art Factory 

Hangzhou Cadman Trading Co., Ltd. 

Hong Kong Da Zhi Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Hualing Furniture (China) Co., Ltd., Tony House Manufacture (China) Co., Ltd., Buysell Investments Ltd., Tony House 

Industries Co., Ltd. 

Huasen Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Hung Fai Wood Products Factory Ltd. 

Jasonwood Industrial Co., Ltd. S.A. 

Jiangmen Kinwai Furniture Decoration Co., Ltd. 

Jiangmen Kinwai International Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Jiangsu Dare Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Jiangsu Xiangsheng Bedtime Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Jiangsu Yuexing Furniture Group Co., Ltd. 

Jibbon Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

Jiedong Lehouse Furniture Co., Ltd. 

King Rich International, Ltd. 

King’s Group Furniture (ENT) Co., Ltd. 

King’s Way Furniture Industries Co., Ltd. 

Kingsyear Ltd. 

Kunshan Summit Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Leefu Wood (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. 

Nanhai Jiantai Woodwork Co., Ltd., Fortune Glory Industrial Ltd. (H.K. Ltd.). 

Nantong Wangzhuang Furniture 

Nantong Yangzi Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Nathan International Ltd., Nathan Rattan Factory 

Orient International Holding Shanghai Foreign Trade Co., Ltd. 

Passwell Corporation, Pleasant Wave Ltd. 

Perfect Line Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Prime Wood International Co., Ltd, Prime Best International Co., Ltd., Prime Best Factory, Liang Huang (Jiaxing) Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

Putian Jinggong Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Qingdao Beiyuan Shengli Furniture Co., Ltd., Qingdao Beiyuan Industry Trading Co., Ltd. 

Qingdao Liangmu Co., Ltd. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
11170 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Notices 

4The deadline to withdraw a review request 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1) continues to be 

90 days from the publication of the initiation notice 

published on February 4, 2015 (80 FR 6041). 5This company was inadvertently omitted from 

the initiation notice that published on February 4, 

2015 (80 FR 6041). 

6The company name listed above inadvertently 

omitted (‘‘Ltd.’’) in the initiation notice that 

published on February 4, 2015 (80 FR 6041). 

7The company name listed above inadvertently 

listed (‘‘u’’) at the end of the name in the initiation 

notice that published on February 4, 2015 (80 FR 

6041). 

8 In the initiation notice that published on 

February 4, 2015 (80 FR 6041), the Department 

inadvertently included Zhejiang Layo Wood 

Industry Co., Ltd. in the initiation of the review of 

the countervailing duty order on Multilayered 

Wood Flooring from the PRC. We are not initiating 

a countervailing duty review with respect to 

Zhejiang Layo Wood Industry Co., Ltd., because this 

company was excluded for the countervailing duty 

order. See 76 FR 76693. 

Period of review 

Qingdao Shengchang Wooden Co., Ltd. 

Restonic (Dongguan) Furniture Ltd., Restonic Far East (Samoa) Ltd. 

Rizhao Sanmu Woodworking Co., Ltd. 

Sen Yeong International Co., Ltd., Sheh Hau International Trading Ltd. 

Shanghai Chengguan lmport & Export, Ltd. 

Shanghai Jian Pu Export & Import Co., Ltd. 

Shanghai Jiangfeng Furniture 

Shanghai Sinofound Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. 

Shanghai Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Shenyang Shining Dongxing Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Shenzhen Forest Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Shenzhen Jiafa High Grade Furniture Co., Ltd., Golden Lion International Trading Ltd. 

Shenzhen New Fudu Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Shenzhen Wonderful Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Shenzhen Xingli Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Shing Mark Enterprise Co., Ltd., Carven Industries Limited (BVI), Carven Industries Limited (HK), Dongguan Zhenxin 

Furniture Co., Ltd., Dongguan Yongpeng Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Songgang Jasonwood Furniture Factory 

Starwood Industries Ltd. 

Strongson Furniture (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., Strongson Furniture Co., Ltd., Strongson (Hk) Co. 

Sunforce Furniture (Hui-Yang) Co., Ltd., Sun Fung Wooden Factory, Sun Fung Co., Shin Feng Furniture Co., Ltd., Stupendous International Co., Ltd. 

Superwood Co., Ltd., Lianjiang Zongyu Art Products Co., Ltd. 

Teamway Furniture (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd. 

Techniwood Industries Ltd., Ningbo Furniture Industries Ltd., Ningbo Hengrun Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Tianjin Phu Shing Woodwork Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

Tube-Smith Enterprise (Haimen) Co., Ltd. 

Tube-Smith Enterprise (Zhangzhou) Co., Ltd. 

U-Rich Furniture (Zhangzhou) Co., Ltd., U-Rich Furniture Ltd. 

Woodworth Wooden Industries (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd. 

Wuxi Yushea Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Xiamen Yongquan Sci-Tech Development Co., Ltd. 

Xilinmen Group Co., Ltd. 

Yeh Brothers World Trade Inc. 

Yichun Guangming Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Yihua Timber Industry Co., Ltd., Guangdong Yihua Timber Industry Co., Ltd. 

Zhang Zhou Sanlong Wood Product Co., Ltd. 

Zhangjiagang Daye Hotel Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Zhangjiang Sunwin Arts & Crafts Co., Ltd. 

Zhangzhou Guohui Industrial & Trade Co., Ltd. 

Zhejiang Tianyi Scientific & Educational Equipment Co., Ltd. 

Zhong Shan Fullwin Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Zhong Shun Wood Art Co. 

Zhongshan Fookyik Furniture Co., Ltd. 

Zhongshan Golden King Furniture Industrial Co., Ltd. 

Zhoushan For-Strong Wood Co., Ltd. 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings 

The People’s Republic of China: Multilayered Wood Flooring 8 C–570–971 ............................................................................... 1/1/13–12/13/13 

Suspension Agreements 

None. 

Duty Absorption Reviews During any administrative review 

covering all or part of a period falling 

between the first and second or third 

and fourth anniversary of the 

publication of an antidumping duty 

order under 19 CFR 351.211 or a 

determination under 19 CFR 

351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or 

suspended investigation (after sunset 

review), the Secretary, if requested by a 

domestic interested party within 30 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation of the review, will 

determine, consistent with FAG Italia v. 

United States, 291 F.3d 806 (Fed Cir. 

2002), as appropriate, whether 

antidumping duties have been absorbed 

by an exporter or producer subject to the 

review if the subject merchandise is 

sold in the United States through an 

importer that is affiliated with such 

exporter or producer. The request must 

include the name(s) of the exporter or 

producer for which the inquiry is 

requested. 

Gap Period Liquidation 

For the first administrative review of 

any order, there will be no assessment 

of antidumping or countervailing duties 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Notices 11171 

9See section 782(b) of the Act. 

10See Certification of Factual Information To 

Import Administration During Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 

17, 2013) (‘‘Final Rule’’); see also the frequently 

asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_

info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. 

on entries of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption during the relevant 

provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of 

the order, if such a gap period is 

applicable to the POR. 

Administrative Protective Orders and 

Letters of Appearance 

Interested parties must submit 

applications for disclosure under 

administrative protective orders in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On 

January 22, 2008, the Department 

published Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Documents Submission Procedures; 

APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January 

22, 2008). Those procedures apply to 

administrative reviews included in this 

notice of initiation. Parties wishing to 

participate in any of these 

administrative reviews should ensure 

that they meet the requirements of these 

procedures (e.g., the filing of separate 

letters of appearance as discussed at 19 

CFR 351.103(d)). 

Revised Factual Information 

Requirements 

On April 10, 2013, the Department 

published Definition of Factual 

Information and Time Limits for 

Submission of Factual Information: 

Final Rule, 78 FR 21246 (April 10, 

2013), which modified two regulations 

related to antidumping and 

countervailing duty proceedings: The 

definition of factual information (19 

CFR 351.102(b)(21)), and the time limits 

for the submission of factual 

information (19 CFR 351.301). The final 

rule identifies five categories of factual 

information in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21), 

which are summarized as follows: (i) 

Evidence submitted in response to 

questionnaires; (ii) evidence submitted 

in support of allegations; (iii) publicly 

available information to value factors 

under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure 

the adequacy of remuneration under 19 

CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed 

on the record by the Department; and (v) 

evidence other than factual information 

described in (i)–(iv). The final rule 

requires any party, when submitting 

factual information, to specify under 

which subsection of 19 CFR 

351.102(b)(21) the information is being 

submitted and, if the information is 

submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct 

factual information already on the 

record, to provide an explanation 

identifying the information already on 

the record that the factual information 

seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The 

final rule also modified 19 CFR 351.301 

so that, rather than providing general 

time limits, there are specific time limits 

based on the type of factual information 

being submitted. These modifications 

are effective for all segments initiated on 

or after May 10, 2013. Please review the 

final rule, available at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/

1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to 

submitting factual information in this 

segment. 

Any party submitting factual 

information in an antidumping duty or 

countervailing duty proceeding must 

certify to the accuracy and completeness 

of that information.9 Parties are hereby 

reminded that revised certification 

requirements are in effect for company/ 

government officials as well as their 

representatives. All segments of any 

antidumping duty or countervailing 

duty proceedings initiated on or after 

August 16, 2013, should use the formats 

for the revised certifications provided at 

the end of the Final Rule.10 The 

Department intends to reject factual 

submissions in any proceeding 

segments if the submitting party does 

not comply with applicable revised 

certification requirements. 

Revised Extension of Time Limits 

Regulation 

On September 20, 2013, the 

Department modified its regulation 

concerning the extension of time limits 

for submissions in antidumping and 

countervailing duty proceedings: Final 

Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013). 

The modification clarifies that parties 

may request an extension of time limits 

before a time limit established under 

Part 351 expires, or as otherwise 

specified by the Secretary. In general, an 

extension request will be considered 

untimely if it is filed after the time limit 

established under Part 351 expires. For 

submissions which are due from 

multiple parties simultaneously, an 

extension request will be considered 

untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. on 

the due date. Examples include, but are 

not limited to: (1) Case and rebuttal 

briefs, filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309; 

(2) factual information to value factors 

under 19 CFR 351.408(c), or to measure 

the adequacy of remuneration under 19 

CFR 351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19 

CFR 351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal, 

clarification and correction filed 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3) 

comments concerning the selection of a 

surrogate country and surrogate values 

and rebuttal; (4) comments concerning 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

data; and (5) quantity and value 

questionnaires. Under certain 

circumstances, the Department may 

elect to specify a different time limit by 

which extension requests will be 

considered untimely for submissions 

which are due from multiple parties 

simultaneously. In such a case, the 

Department will inform parties in the 

letter or memorandum setting forth the 

deadline (including a specified time) by 

which extension requests must be filed 

to be considered timely. This 

modification also requires that an 

extension request must be made in a 

separate, stand-alone submission, and 

clarifies the circumstances under which 

the Department will grant untimelyfiled requests for the extension of time 

limits. These modifications are effective 

for all segments initiated on or after 

October 21, 2013. Please review the 

final rule, available at http://

www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/

html/2013-22853.htm, prior to 

submitting factual information in these 

segments. 

These initiations and this notice are 

in accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i). 

Dated: February 24, 2015. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2015–04346 Filed 2–27–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Advance Notification of 

Sunset Reviews 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

Background 

Every five years, pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the 

International Trade Commission 

automatically initiate and conduct a 

review to determine whether revocation 

of a countervailing or antidumping duty 

order or termination of an investigation 

suspended under section 704 or 734 of 

the Act would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

or a countervailable subsidy (as the case 

may be) and of material injury. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES