# Environmental Protection Agency

Division of Air Pollution Control

# Table of Contents

Highlights from 2009

Objectives for 2009, and the Status of Compliance with Each

Summary of 

# the Environmental Improvements

Overall Program Statistics

Field Office Statistics

Penalty Statistics

# Highlights from the Ohio EPA's 2009 Air Enforcement Activities

91.9% compliance rate at the end of the year for 1,562 High Priority Facilities

95 cases resolved

54 cases resolved with Findings and Orders (only 52 F&Os were issued)

22 referrals to the Attorney General's Office

57 cases resolved by the Attorney General's Office (3 

## Court Orders resolved 47cases, 45 of which were involved in the Shelly Materials, Inc. trial, and 8 Consent Orders resolved 9 cases)

100 new cases

85 cases pending at the end of the year within the DAPC Enforcement Committee

62 cases pending at the end of the year at the Attorney General's Office

$ 4,762,285 in civil penalties:

$ 1,279,080 Ohio EPA $ 2,295,387 Ohio EPA/AGO $ 60,300 local air agencies $1,127,518 USEPA

The total air civil penalties assessed in Ohio since 1984 equal $115,823,849.

## The following total emission reductions resulted (or will result) from the enforcement cases resolved through F&Os and Consent Orders: CO - 2 TPY; particulates

- 104 TPY; VOC/OC

- 35 TPY; NOx

- 157 TPY; and 

## 802

- 1,873 TPY.

The following major enforcement cases were resolved by 

## the Ohio EPA or the Ohio EPA/AGO with large civil penalties, i.e., equal to or greater than $100,000:

Plasti-Kote Company, Inc. The Belden Brick Company, L.L.C. The Shelly Holding Company, et al. (Court decision is under appeal by OEPA) CertainTeed Corporation Circle K Midwest Aleris International, Inc., Commonwealth Aluminum Concast, Inc. (Ohio), IMCO Recycling of Ohio, Inc., et al. (joint case with USEPA) Emery Oleochemicals, LLC 

## $ 240,000 $1,000,000 $ 350,123

$ 230,000 $ 100,000 $ 334,545* (*Ohio portion)



## $ 143,500

# DAPe Enforcement Objectives for CY 2009, and the Status of Compliance with Each

1. Achieve an overall compliance percentage for High Priority Facilities (HPFs) of 93.0% or greater. (This would include any HPF with emission and/or significant administrative violations.)

At the end of CY 2008, the compliance percentage for HPFs was only 86.7%. By the end of CY 2009, the compliance percentage had increased to 91.9%

2. Resolve 80 or more EC cases during CY 2009, and of the 80, use F&O's to resolve 40 or more of the cases.
95 cases were resolved during the CY, and 54 of those cases were resolved with F&O's.

3. 

## By 12/31, resolve all 37 oUhe "old cases" on the EC docket. (Where an "old case" is defined as any case on the docket at the end of the CY that would have an EAR date prior to July 1, 2008.)

At the end of 2009, there were 10 unresolved "old cases" on the EC docket.

4. Develop each new case received during the calendar year in a timely manner. ("Develop" :: prepare a OWL, draft F&O's, or a referral to the AGO.)

This was an ongoing effort of the DAPC.

5. Give priority to resolving all of the cases involving High Priority Violators. Top priority was given to all the High Priority Violator cases in order to resolve them as quickly as possible.

6. Continue to calculate the environmental improvementfor each resolved case.
This was calculated for each of the cases resolved during the CY where there was an environmental improvement.

## SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL iMPROVEMENTS RESULTiNG FROM OHIO EPA AIR ENFORCEMENT SETTLEMENTS DURING 2009

FACILITY SETTLEMENT TYPE OF POLLUTANT DATE SETTLEMENT POLLUTANT REDUCTIONS REMEDY



### T.S. Trim Industries, 06/17/09 

### F&Os NOx 1 TPY Emissions reductions Inc. CO 2 TPY were achieved through VOC <1 TPY the replacement of a PM <1 TPY natural gas-fired thermal oxidizer with a new nonincineration, switch bed ad sorber. Chemtrade Logistics 04/02/09 

### Consent SO, 1,171 TPY Reduction of 883 TPY of (US), Inc.lChemtrade Decree SO, emissions resulted Refinery Services, from installing a new Inc.lMarsulex, Inc. scrubber at the Cairo (Cairo and Oregon facility. facilities) Improvement of chemical processes will result in the reduction of 288 TPY of SO, emissions at the Oregon facility.

The Belden Brick 07/06/09 

### Consent SO, 702 TPY SO, emissions Company, LLC Order reductions resulted from installing a slurry scrubber to control emissions from the Plant 8 kilns (-202 TPY) and a dry scrubber to control emissions from the Plant 3 kiln (-500 TPY).

CertainTeed 10/19/09 

### Consent PE 29 TPY Operational problems Corporation Order with the bag house serving emissions unit P011 (Line #2 filler heater) were corrected.
Emery Oleochemicals, 12/17109 

### F&Os PE 18 TPY PE reductions occurred LLC OC 8 TPY as a result of a fuel switch from coal to 

### #4 fuei oil for emissions unit B028, adjustment of boiler oil burners, and repairs to the bag house control.

OC emission reductions resulted from the replacement of the catalytic oxidizers serving emissions units P010 and P017 (ozonolysis processes) with regenerative thermal oxidizers. Page 1

## SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL iMPROVEMENTS RESULTING FROM OHIO EPA AIR ENFORCEMENT SETTLEMENTS DURING 2009

FACILITY SETTLEMENT TYPE OF POLLUTANT DATE SETTLEMENT POLLUTANT REDUCTIONS REMEDY



### D&R Supply, Inc. 12/02/09 F&Os PM 56TPY An existing wet scrubber controlling emissions from emissions unit P901 (asphaltic concrete plant with rotary drum dryer) was replaced with a baghouse.

Evonik Degussa 12/17/09 F&Os NOx 67 TPY Improvements were Engineered Carbons VOC 3 TPY made to operation of the Corporation common flare. serving emissions units P001 and P002 (carbon black production units).

E.l. Ceramics, LLC 12/21/09 F&Os OC 23 TPY An interlocking system was installed for emissions units P002 (blending, processing, glazing, and curing process with fabric filter and thermal oxidizer), P005 (curing oven #2 with thermal oxidizer), and all other units controlled with thermal oxidizers. The interlocking system shuts down the emissions units if the temperature of the associated thermal oxidizer falls below a set level.
Republic Engineered 12130/09 F&Os NOx 89 TPY Repairs were made to Products, Inc. emissions unit P081, a 421.6 million Btu/hour bloom reheat furnace with a. low NOx burner.

SUMMARY TABLE

POLLUTANT

Particulates VOC/OC CO NOx SO,

TOTAL TOTAL REDUCTIONS

104 TPY

35 TPY

2TPY 157 TPY 1,873 TPY
2,171 TPY
Page 2

# Overall Program Statistics

## en w



## u u. 

# o IX: 

# w !Xl 

## :2E ::::l 

### Z 

# NUMBER OF CASES REFERRED TO THE AGO DURING 2000 THRU 2009

50

2000 2001 2002 2004 2003 2005 

## CALENDAR YEAR 2006 2007 2008 2009

# en w

() 

### u. 

# o 0::: W 

### III 

## ::iE ::J Z 

# AIR ENFORCEMENT CASES RESOLVED BY THE OEPA/AGO DURING 2000 THRU 2009

57

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 

## CALENDAR YEAR

# Field Office Statistics

(The following graph does not include the partial-role local air agencies, i.e., the Lake County General Health District and Mahoning-Trumbull Air Pollution Control Agency. During 2007, 2008, and 2009, the Lake County General Health District was involved in the resolution of 3, 2, and 0 enforcement cases, respectively. During 2007,2008, and 2009, the Mahoning-Trumbull Air Pollution Control Agency was involved in the resolution of 4,6, and 1 enforcement cases, respectively.)

# SUMMARY OF TOTAL CASES RESOLVED BY FIELD OFFICE FOR 2007, 2008, AND 2009

20 -,----------------------------------,

TDES PORTS CDO CAN 

### 18**-I------~** 

### -- ------- ---------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------- - ------------.----------------.----------------- --- -------------1
(J) 

### 16 

# + -----1 

## +-

------------- --------+f---------

----- ----- --- -------------- ---------------- --- -------------------------------------------. ----- ----- ----- --- -----------1 

### W 14 

## -i------Jf-------------------- (,) 12

### ~--- 

## u.. 

# o 10

- \

------------ ... 

## 0::" " •.. 8

-----------**-----~-** 

### ---------

# ~: -_:::--:::

__ 

# ::_- 

# :::::

...

# -------:::::_~

>"**;:~** 

### 2

.**:~;** 

## ._._.:s .;, -'-.. ._----0: 

# o :;,:: AKRON NEDO CLEVE NWDO SWDO HAMCO SEDO RAPCA 

## FIELD OFFICE

2007 

# 11III 2008 2009

## HPV

_ ComplianceStatus

_ USEP A



# Compliance & 

# Enforcement Tracking Application Unresolvesl 

# }trv**C~** 

## Unresolved Non- HrV 

## Cases J:'age 1 

## or L



# - 11a£l< 

## to.Query.RepQrt Compliance status of Ohio's Title V and Synthetic Minor Facilities

Overall Overall Total Ntlmber of Total Number of Total Number of Compliance Compliance TWe V Facilities Total Number of Overall Overall Synthetic Minor Synthetic Minor Percentage Percentage with Unresolved Title V Facilities Compliance Compliance Total Number of Facilities with Facilities with foc for OOfLAA Total Number of Formal with Unresolved Percentage for Percentage for Synthetic Minor Unresolved Unresolved Synthe.tic Synthetic Tllle V FacilHies Violations (HPV Formal Title V Facilities Tille V Fadlities Facilities Formal Formal Minor Minor and Non-HPV Violations (HPV {HPV and Non- (HPV Cases Vlolations (HPV Violations (HPV Facilities Facilities Cases) Cases Only) HPV Cases) Only) and Non-HPV Cases Only) (HPVand (HPV Gases) Non-HPV Cases Cases) Only) 01 CDO 55 8 6 85.5 89.1 107 6 2 94.4 98.1
02 NEOO 110 18 16 83.6 85.5 106 6 5 94.3 95.3 03 NWOO 133 28 20 78.9 85.0 144 9 5 93.8 96.5 04 TOES 27 3 2 88.9 92.6 21 4 1 81.0 95.2 05 SWDQ 15 0 0 100.0 100.0 30 0 0 100.0 100.0
06 SEDO 85 7 7 91.8 91.8 126 4 3 96.8 97.6 07 Ports, CHO 15 0 0 100.0 100.0 10 0 0 100.0 100.0 08 RAPCA 38 2 1 94.7 97.4 81 3 1 96.3 98.8 13 Cleve.DAQ 51 8 4 84.3 92.2 69 2 0 97.1 100.0 14 HAMCO DES 61 4 4 93.4 93A 126 9 1 92.9 99.2 15 Canton APC 24 1 1 95.8 9S.8 27 0 0 100.0 100.0 16 Akron RAQMD 29 4 3 86.2 89.7 72 1 1 98.6 98.6

Totals 

### 643 33 

### 64 87. t**~-"'O** 90_0% 919 

### 44 19 95.2% 97.9?/o t!.Q.t§.;
Ovei'alJ Compliance Percentage = (Total Number of Facilities

- Total Number of Facilities with Unreso.lved Forma! Violations {fatal Number of Facilities) :;: 100%

Do not include the shutdown facilities.



### ,. .,. 

### .......... ..-. 

# . 1 

## nonm ()

# Penalty Statist: ics

# CASH CIVIL PENALTIES ASSESSED BY THE OHIO EPA DURING 2000 THRU 2009

1.8



## en 

# z 

# o :J ..J 

## ::iE 

# z
en 

# w i= 

# <i! z W Q. 

### ..J 

# :> ()



### 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

. 2005 2006

## CAL..EN[)A~YEAR 2008 2009,,-'



# - (J) 

# z 

# o :J ...J 

### :::iE 

# z 

# = (J) 

# w i= 

# <i! z w 

# a. ...J 

# :> u 2.25

### .-. 

# rn z 

# o ::::i ...J 

## ::iE 

# z '=' 

# rn w 

## i= 

# :a! z W 

### 0. ...J 

# :> 

# u . . 

### ..... 

## ;

. 

### .


# CASH CIVILPENALTIES·ASSESSED BY THE OHIO EPA/AGO DURING 2000 THRU 2009 .;

2.56· '. 

### '.


# TOTAL CIVil PENALTIES ASSESSED BY THE OHIO EPA/AGO DURING 2000 THRU2009

C/) 

# z 0 

## 2.82 

## :::i ...I 

# :a: z
C/) 

### UJ 

## i= 

# <i! z UJ 

# a. ...I 

# :> C3

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 

## CALENDAR YEAR 2007 2008 2009

# en z 

# o ..J ..J 

# :z z :::;:.. 

# en w i= 

# <l. z w C. ..J 

# :> () , , ' , 

# CASH CIVIL PENALTIES ASSESSED IN OHIO DURINq 2000 THRU 2009

# en z 

# o :::i ..J 

## :iE 

# z


# en w 

## i= 

# <i! z w 

# a. ..J 

# :> 

# u "

.. :.

- .-. 

## """; :'. 

# TOTAL CIVIL PENALTIES ASSESSED IN OHIO DURING 2000 THRU 2009

2004 2b05 

## CALENDAR YEAR2007 2004 

### 2000 

# m'l

__**m~: ~"**  

# I 2001 

# RUNNING TOTALS OF 

# CIVil PENALTIES

_',

.. ,'

.... " .'<'_

.. ::(,

.....

_ ..• < :<' -:, -.-:_:', c. -:','.:: -'>,<",.<- -". '-. :'0-' ',:':« :

.. ::: -:,' ',

..... ':_ ',"

.. :: -.:

_ 

# ASSESSED IN OHIO DURING 2000 THRU 2009**-------~-** --- --- ---- 

### . --



# _ __________----- : ::::_:::--:

__ ::

.. _:-:-::**:-:_1:~7_1a** 

# __**:_~~~:1:_**

2000 

## 130 120C=1

# ===~~~
110 

# +----------------- 100-_ 1

# ~: 

# ....•••••••...**·....~80~9i14_** 

# .. 3

. 

## o ......W... ".44 ,..,..' •. ,--.... 911.63



# 1: T------,-----------

.. --------.-------------------.---- ---. ---------- --- --- ------------- ---- ------------------- ---------------------iLead Sources and Lead Monitors LocationsLegend:Monitors – Sources -TRI(tpy)StateEmissionsReporting(tpy)Sources(>0.5tpy)05060708090506070809EllwoodEngineeredCastings(1)1.7352.0131.8251.8252.0601.0601.6801.9800.135AmericaSpringWireCorp(1)1.1871.1980.6070.5940.588NTVNTVNTVNTVNTVNucorSteelMarion,Inc.(1)0.7300.8101.0100.747TimkenCo.(2)1.0450.9840.805NRNR0.3200.160NRNRNRI.SchumannCo.(3)0.5500.5500.4500.4500.400NTVNTVNTV0.7930.692GeneralJamesM.GavinPowerPlant(3)0.5800.5700.4800.1800.000SeverstalWarren(3)2.4002.0602.4800.6820.321MONITORSMiddletown39‐017‐0015ColumbianaPort39‐029‐0019MichiganAve.39‐029‐0020Maryland39‐029‐0022St.Tikhon39‐035‐0038FireSta.439‐035‐0042MMSouth39‐035‐0061Woodrow39‐049‐0025Marietta39‐167‐0008Marietta39‐167‐0010Ferro39‐035‐0049(sourcew/monitor)BuntingBearing39‐051‐0001(sourcew/monitor)AmSpringWire39‐035‐0072(2010sourcew/monitor)NucorSteel39‐101‐0003(2010sourcew/monitor)Timken39‐151‐0017(2010sourcew/monitor)Ellwood39‐155‐0012(2010sourcew/monitor)G.T.Craig39‐035‐0060(2011NCore)Taft39‐061‐0040(2011NCore)MoraineFH39‐113‐7001(2011NCore)(1)alreadymonitored(seemonitorsection)(2)PermanentShutdown2/28/09(seemonitorsection)(3)Nomonitorrequiredpermodeling‐requestedwaiverNTV=non‐TitleVandthereforenotsubjecttoStateEmissionsReportingNR=notreportedOhio EPA Division of Air Pollution ControlFunding Sources Fiscal Years 2012 – 2014Division Fee DescriptionFiscalYear LastChangedORCSectionEstimatedAnnualRevenueCurrent Fee Amount/Range & Structure Payer Due DateSunsetY/NVariousEnvironmentalProtection Fee2006 3734$22,000,000$1.50 per ton of solid waste divided among all programsand accounted for separately.Landfills Monthly NDAPCTitle 5 EmissionFees2003 3745.11$14,600,000CY 2010 emission fee is $44.48/ton. A CPI adjustmentoccurs each year.Utilities andlargemanufacturersAnnually,July 1NDAPCAutomobileEmission TestingProgram FundingVaries N/A$13,030,000As specified by the General Assembly to provide moniesfor the contractor to operate the program. In FY2008-2009, general revenue fund monies were provided.GeneralRevenue FundsVaries NDAPCAsbestosRemoval Fee19933704.03and3745.11$300,000Fees are charged for the notification ($75) and cubicyards ($4) and square feet ($3) of asbestos removed.FacilitiescontainingasbestosUponApplicationNDAPCNon Title 5Biennial PTOFees2003 3745.11 $750,000Fees are charged every two years based on annualemissions in tons. Fee nearly doubled in 2003 forsources emitting less than 50 tons per year, but a numberof those sources were exempt due to ORC change. Whilethe fee per ton charge increased, total revenue collecteddecreased due to the exemptions. Fee is graduated andbased on tons emitted in the prior calendar year, andranges from $100-$700/year.SmallmanufacturesEvery twoyears, inJulyNDAPC Permit to Install 2003 3745.11 $790,000Fee charged for construction of new air polluting sources.Fees nearly doubled in 2004 but many sources wereexempted and total revenue collected decreased. Thisfee category contains many individual fees of variousamounts.Facilities whoinstalledregulatedemissionssourcesUponApplicationNDAPCFederallyEnforceable StateOperatingPermits(FESOPs) alsoreferred to assynthetic minorfacilities.2002 3745.11 $320,000SFY 2001 was the first year these applications werebilled, fee has not changedsince inception. Fee isgraduated and based on tons emitted in the prior calendaryear, and ranges from $170-$3,350/ton.Med-sizedmanufacturersnot covered byTitle V or NonTitle VAnnual,invoicingtakesplacesApril-JulyYDAPC Federal GrantChangesannuallyN/A $6,200,000Federal Grants including Section 105 and PM2.5 (103Grant).U.S. EPA Varies NDAPC112r: RiskManagementPlant (RMP)program, alsoreferred to as theaccidentalrelease program2000 3753.05 $125,000Qualifying facilities must pay an annual fee based on theamount of toxic substancesthey have. $50 registrationfee with the following: $65 for propane if it is the onlyregulated substance on site; $65 anhydrous ammoniasold for agricultural use; $200 for all other substances.Facilities withtoxicsubstancesonsiteAnnually,September1N

# OhioEP.JL 

# DifJilJitm 

# qf 

# Air Pollution Control 

# InteroMce communication

to: from: subject:
date: DAPC**M~~ers;** 

### EER Contacts
Todd Browr{ CEMS/COMS Coordinator

1 st 

### Quarter, 2011, EER Summary Report
July, 2011

Attached is the first quarter, 2011 excess emissions reports ("EER") summary report. Data used to compile this report were taken from all EERs received as of the morning of July 7, 2011. Second quarter 2011 EERs will be expected no later than August 15, 2011, and reports received after this date may show as late/not received in the next quarterly EER summary report.

Work on the EER data entry program continues. Unfortunately the program is not ready for universal distribution and use. For second quarter 2011 data entry, the program will be sent out to both a district and a local office for use and feedback. Hopefully we can get the kinks worked out and have it out to everybody for third quarter EER data entry.

This quarter it has been noted that there were many EER summaries submitted that classified CEMS "Downtime" in the "Excess Emissions" portion on the data summary sheet, and then put a note in the comments section as to why the downtime was being classified in a given category. Please do not include downtime in the excess emissions portion of the EER data sheet. There are only two downtimes that need to be reported on the' EER data summary sheet: all CEMS downtime that occurred during source operation including QA/QC; 

### and, all CEMS downtime that occurred during source operation not including QA/QC. 

### If a further breakdown of CEMS downtime is required, you will be contacted for more details.

Also with regard to CEMS downtime, there are still quite a few EERs being submitted that are either not reporting CEMS downtime including QA/QC, or that are reporting the same amount of CEMS downtime with QA/QC 

### as without QA/QC. Although QA/QC 

### checks may be completed in enough time that a "valid hour" of data is collected by the CEMS, QA/QC 

### events do need to be quantified and included in the EER summary reports. Please see the fourth quarter of 2010 EER summary report for more details if necessary.
Please review the data included in this summary for facilities within your jurisdiction. Corrections or adjustments should be sent to my attention. If you have questions regarding this report, or suggestions that would make the report more useful or easier to read, please call me at (614) 644-4839, or email me at «todd.brown@epa.state.oh.us».

## Ohio EPA Division of Air Pollution Control Executive Summary as of Quarter 1, 2011

REPORTING INFORMATION

_-0

_

..**_.~~** __ ,_.

__**.~** •.•

____ __ .

___________ 

### Unique Late or Not Agencies Facilities Sources Monitors Combinations On Time Received Percent On Time COO 13 22 42 44 44 0 100.00 NEDO 22 20 63 68 3 65 4.41 NWDO 33 41 89 117 117 

# a 100.00 TOLEDO 18 56 60 113 113 

### 0 100.00 SEDO 20 40 101 157 157 0 100.00 PORTS 5 11 40 40 38 2 95.00 RAPCA 8 16 45 55 55 0 100.00 CLEVELAND 8 15 12 19 19 

# a 100.00 HCDES 19 35 98 106 106 

## a 100.00 CANTON 5 20 23 35 35 0 100.00 AKRON 4 8 9 13 9 4 69.23 SWDO 1 2 1 2 

## a 2 0.00


### TOTAL 

### 156 286 583 769 696 73 90.51%

AVERAGE DO AVERAGELAA



### 82.73% 98.43% AVERAGE DO 

### & LAA



### 90.51%

PERCENT OF MONITORED EMISSIONS UNITS EXPERIENCING NON-EXEMPT EXCESS EMISSIONS

COUNT PERCENT 5 1.0 TO 1.9 PERCENT NON-EXEMPT EXCESS EMISSIONS »»»> 0.86 1 2.0 TO 2.9 PERCENT NON-EXEMPT EXCESS EMISSIONS »»»> 0.17 2 3.0 TO 3.9 PERCENT NON-EXEMPT EXCESS EMISSIONS »»»> 0.34 2 4.0 TO 4.9 PERCENT NON-EXEMPT EXCESS EMISSIONS »»»> 0.34 20 5.0 PERCENT AND GREATER NON-EXEMPT EXCESS EMISSIONS> 3.43

1.0 TO 1.9 PERCENT MONITOR DOWNTIME »»»»»»»»> 2.0 TO 2.9 PERCENT MONITOR DOWNTIME »»»»»»»»> 3.0 TO 3.9 PERCENT MONITOR DOWNTIME »»»»»»»»> 4.0 TO 4.9 PERCENT MONITOR DOWNTIME »»»»»»»»> 5.0 PERCENT AND GREATER MONITOR DOWNTIME »»»»» PERCENT OF MONITORED EMISSIONS UNITS EXPERIENCING MONITOR DOWNTIME

COUNT 70 

### 5 13 

### 6 23 PERCENT 12.01 0.86 2.23 1.03 3.95

SUM MARY. FRX _ M 

### 0 N ITO R. D BF; PR EVP N. P RG PRINTED: 7/7/2011 11:34 AM

# EM owntim
Thursday, July 07,2011

0302020012 LIMA REFINING COMPANY POlO 5162 129600 9305 7.18%

0575010160 CARGILL INC., SIDNEY BOOl S295 128478 12087 9.41%

0616000000 CONESVILLE

- AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER B003 5217 88824 14760 16.62%

0641090234 MINGO JUNCTION ENERGY BOOl N205 600 180 30.00%

0641090234 MINGO JUNCTION ENERGY B002 N206 660 180 27.27%

0641160017 W H SAMMIS

- OHIO EDISON COMPANY B007 P050 129600 129600 100.00%

0641160017 W H SAMMIS

- OHIO EDISON COMPANY B009 P052 126120 126120 100.00%

0641160017 W H SAMMIS

- OHIO EDISON COMPANY BOll P054 106140 106140 100.00%

0679000251 BELDEN BRICK CO P801 S290 128580 60660 47.18%

0679000251 BELDEN BRICK CO P803 5290 128580 60660 47.18%

0701000060 KILLEN

- DAYTON POWER & LIGHT BOOl POOO 111360 10913 9.80%

1431350817 E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY POOl**Tota~** More than 5% Time CEMS Downtime: 23 5155 91020 91020 100.00%

Page 1 of 1

# 5 S5 

# E .. .. 

## ISSI 

# s Thursday, July 07, 2011

0124000132 ASA BLOOMINGBURG BOOl N463 26100 129600 20.14%

0641090010 SEVERSTAL (WHEELING PITTSBURGH STEEL) BI03 H040 12240 129600 9.44%

0641090010 SEVERSTAL (WHEELING PITTSBURGH STEEL) BI05 H040 12240 129600 9.44%

0641090010 SEVERSTAL (WHEELING PITTSBURGH STEEL) BI07 H040 12240 129600 9.44%

0641090010 SEVERSTAL (WHEELING PITTSBURGH STEEL) P006 H040 12240 129600 9.44%

0641090010 SEVERSTAL (WHEELING PITTSBURGH STEEL) P008 H040 12240 129600 9.44%

0671010028 GLATFELTER B014 COlO 4320 18343 22.73%

0701000007 STUART

- DAYTON POWER & LIGHT B002 P281 1012 2289 44.21%

0819750245 ANDERSONS ETHANOL 8002 N445 24660 119700 19.88%

1576002006 MARATHON ASHLAND PETROLEUM

- CANTO P016 S125 4620 91500 5.03%

More than 5% Excess Emissions: 19

Page 1 of 1

# STATEWIDE SUMMARY OF MONITORED SOURCES IN RELATION TO NONEXEMPT EXCESS EMISSIONS

4.00

....**~~** ...................... ,v ·•·

.. · ·.·.·.· · v · ..**~,·.~** w · · .. · ·.·.·.·.· .. · · ·.· •. · · .. ·<w.·.v.· , w**=v.~wn:'3'tt'** .. = v

.. v wv v.w " v" w" w.v<·"**C,.:.3'4~w** ......• " m.w.w.w"w**~·** •• ·.·**~.·** w w. 0.17

0.00**-'~** ......... ......... -- 0.50 \

w · ... 2 • 0 0 ....• 

### L "' "' ·.·.·.· ·.· · .. · ·,w · wv.·.'w w·,w · • ·.· ·.·.·.·.· •. · •. · · •• · ·,w m,w.' "<v

· '.·.· •. · •. · •. · •. · •. · w · w · ·•· · .• · ,w • "' •• w.·.· ·.· · •. ·.,w

.. v.· ·.· •. ·.·.·.· · .• ·.· •. w ·.·.·.w.· ·,w v w······· l 

## s o U 1.50
R C 

### E 1.00

S M 

## o 3.5 0

. ..;-

m

_ m • ·.·.·w··, · • •· .•••**·w~_."'"** •. ·**·_~·.·** _ ,**·~,~** •**~~.·** ··,,· •

..

_**_~ m~** **._** , , , ,

_ , , - =

_ , ..**~ ,** = ;

_ , , . N I T 3.0 0**w·t~<w<'~wm.'.~~'~w** .. m"""

.. '_ , w.w**~_,** .. , ...•. ·.·.w.· •. ·.·.·.·.· •. ·.w.· ••**·.·.'w.·.·.w.·.·.·.·.~·.~,·<,=,~ ~,w**  ,w<**w<,~~w.·.,·** <

..**<~,·=·** •.**·.·<~ ~w.~** **·<.·=~w** • .w.w.· ·,w w**w.~~** .. ,= .w

..**~w** .• ·=w<w.w._.· ·.·•· .• ·.w <

.. w

..**,·<,~·.w.'w.·.~~~w.".·.,,'w.·.~·.·** .. · w

.. ·.,·.w.,·.w.w.· •.• w •. ·•··

.. "v.w

.. w

..**w.·.w.~w"** •• ·**~·** w .•**~w.** 

## o R 2.50 E D



### %



# -

1.0 TO 1.9 2.0 TO 2.9 3.0 TO 3.9 4.0 TO 4.9 RANGE OF EXCESS EMISSIONS (%) 5.0+



### CENS Executive Summary Chart I PRINTD: 7/7/201112:07 PM

# STATEWIDE SUMMARY OF MONITORED SOURCES IN RELATION TO MONITOR DOWNTIME

1.03 2.23 3.95 _____ •**_~~~~~~~".~~~~~_~ ~~**  nYo',.**,,_~**

0.86 12.01

8.00**.+--~".~~**

2.**00·~r-=~·,,~**

0.00+--- 

## s 

## o 6. 00**4"·~y---,,~-~~** U R C 4.00**,0-~---~~** E S 14. 00**<_,....._~~_~_."c~~~"~y** __ •.**~~~** __**'<~_.~_,>Y"Y<.**

M 

## o 12.00
N I
T 10.00 

## o R E D



### %



# -

1.0 TO 1.9 2.0 TO 2.9 3.0 TO 3.9 4.0 TO 4.9 RANGES OF MONITOR DOWNTIME (%) 5.0+

CEMS Executive Summary Chart II 

### PRINTED: 7/7/201112:07 PM

# ING REPORT 

# aiDEA.\
Year: 

### 2011 Qrt: 1 

### Total Missing: 6 Thursday, July 07,2011

Prerrlise Source Mntrid Facility Agency Name Emissions unit 

### Yeat

Akron Regional Air Quality Manage 

### Missing: 

### 4

1667040085 B007 P567 KENT STATE UNIVERSITY Akron Regional Air Quality 121mmBtu gas blr 1 2011 Management District

1667040085 B007 N286 KENT STATE UNIVERSITY Akron Regional Air Quality (lb/mmBtu) 121mmBtu gas blr 1 2011 Management District

1667040085 B006 P566 KENT STATE UNIVERSITY Akron Regional Air Quality 121mmBtu gas blr 1 2011 Management District

1667040085 B006 N287 KENT STATE UNIVERSITY Akron Regional Air Quality (lbjmmBtu) 121mmBtu gas blr 1 2011 Management District

Portsmouth Local air Agency 

### Missing: 2

0701000060 BOOl S135 KILLEN

- DAYTON POWER 

### & LIGHT Portsmouth Local air Agency

0701000060 BOOl D001 KILLEN

- DAYTON POWER 

### & LIGHT Portsmouth Local air Agency



### Total Missing: 6 (lb/mmBtu) Coal Boiler w/ESP (particulate Ib/mmBtu) Coal Boiler w/ESP 1 2011



### 1 2011

Page 

### 1 of 

### 1

# Fit\S1t Quarter" 2011 EER Action Recommendations

The follo\ving recolllillendations are nlade based expressly on excess elnissions report ('lEER") data froln the 

### third qua11er of 2010 through the first qual1er of 201 

### L based on all EERs received as of the 1110rning of 

### July 7. 2011. Source operation tillle, CEMS/COMS downtime, excess elllissions, and the ability of a facility to correct problellls frorn quarter to quarter were taken into account when 11laking these recolnillendations. Action recommendations are only Inade for sources that were in operation at least**5~/0** of the avai i8b Ie tillle in the specified quarter. These are only recolllinendations; it is up to the district or local office to take appropriate action for any CEMS/COMS downtillle or recorded excess eillissions at assigned facilities. Recolnlnendations do not take into account any actions that may already have been taken. The level of actions taken for CEMS/COMS dOvvntin1e and recorded exceedences should be adjusted to take into account facility inforlnation that was not used in developing this list, such as Director's approved ll1aintenance requests and Inonitor certification periods. Please be aware that this data may be the basis of future enforcement actions, so problelns should be addressed accordingly.



### Warning Letter
Prernise Facility Nanle Eluissions Unit Paralueter 1 st Quarter 2011 4 th Qualier 2010 3 rd Quarter 2010 ID B009 H2S (gr/dscf) lO.16%DT
8016 H2S (gr/dscf) 10.16 %DT
8026 H2S (gr/dscf) 10.16 % DT
B027 H2S (gr/dscf) 10.16 

### % DT
8028 H2S (gr/dscf) 10.16 % DT 

### I Opacity 6.26 

### % EE 1 0302020012 Lilna Refining COlnpany I POlO CO (pplll @ 0 % 02) 7.00 

### % EE 

### I S02 (lb @ K lb feed) 7.18 % DT 29.26 % DT 

### I
I S02 (lblk Ib S prod) 17.00 % EE P040 S02 (ppm 

### @ 0% 02) 6.12 

### % EE
S02 (lb/k lb S prod) 17.00 %EE 

### I I P04l 

# I S02 (ppm 

### @ 0% 02) 6.12 % EE
I 0448020007 BP Oil Company

- Toledo Refinery P037 S02 (ppill @ 0% 02) 20.l7%DT I i BOOI S02 (lbhnlnBtu) 9.41 % DT : 0575010160 Cargill Inc., Sidney B002 S02 (lb/ll1lnBtu) 9.41 % DT ! 

### Page 1 of 4II 

### Warning Letter Ii q Pren1ise Facility Nan1e Elnissions Unit Paralneter 1 st Qualier 2011 4 th Qualier 2010 3 rd Quarter 20 I U 

### II ID
B001 Opacity 10.26 % DT I 0701000007 Stuart Station

- DPL 

### I 8004 Opacity 7.00 % DT 

## ! Opacity 9.80 % DT 

## !I 0701000060 K.illen Station

- DPL B001 Particulate 12.06**~/o** DT I I S02 (lbhnlnBtu) 5.24 % 

### EE I I ! 1431350064 AgriulTI North Bend Nitrogen Operations POOl NOx (lb/ton acid prod) 21.35 % DT
1576000301 Marathon Ashland POll S02 (ppm 

### @ 0% 02) 5.03 % EE 5.43 % DT
POll S02 (lb/hr) 5.43 % DT I 

### I P016 S02 (ppm 

### @ 0% 02) 5.03 % EE 5.43 %DT 

# I

P016 S02 (lb/hr) 5.43 % DT 

# I

i1 

### NOV :1 .I :1 Prelnise Facility Nanle Elnissions Unit Paralneter 1 st Quarter 2011 4 th Quarter 2010 3 rd Quarter 201 {) ! I ID I I B001 NOx (lb/hr) 20.14 % EE 18.16 

### % EE 

# I 0124000132 ASA Bloolningburg 

### I B002 NOx (lb/hr) 20.14 

### % EE 18.16 % EE



### Page 2 of 4

## EAR

Prelnise Facility Nalne Elnissions Unit Paralneter 1 st Quarter 2011 4 th Quarter 2010 3 rd Quarter 20 l ID
B003 S02 (lbhnlnBtu) 16.62 %DT Opacity 100 % DT 100 % DT 100 % DT 

### I 0616000000 Conesville

- AEP B004 , S02 (lbhnmBtu) 10.95 % DT 8.03 % DT 

### I B008 Opacity 10.68 % DT 

### I j I BI03 H2S (gr/DSCF) 9.44 % EE 18.29 0 10 EE 14.67 % EE 

### I I ----; B104 H2S (gr/DSCF) 9.44 % EE 18.29 0 10 EE 14.67**~/o** EE 

### II BIOS H2S (gr/DSCF) 9.44 % EE 18.29 % EE 14.67 % EE 

## I' B106 H2S (gr/DSCF) 9.44 % EE 18.29%EE 14.67 % EE 

### I BI07 H2S (gr/DSCF) 9.44 % EE 18.290/0EE 14.67**~/o** EE 

### I 0641090010 Severstal Stee I 9.44 % EE I BI08 H2S (gr/DSCF) 18.290/0EE 14.67**~/o** EE i I 9.44 % EE ! P006 H2S (gr/DSCF) 18.29 %EE 14.67**~/o** EE 11 P007 H2S (gr/DSCF) 9.44 0 10 EE 18.29 % EE 14.67**~/o** EE Ii

l! ij 9.44 % EE ,i P008 H2S (gr/DSCF) 18.29 % EE 14.67**~/o** EE 11 !J 

### !l P911 H2S (gr/DSCF) 9.44 % EE 18.29 % EE 14.67**~/o** EE 11 II '1 B007 Opacity 100 

### % DT 100 % DT 100**~/;)** DT 

## II B008 Opacity 100 

### % DT 100 % DT 100**~/o** DT 

## II B009 Opacity 100 

### % DT 100 % DT 100'%DT 

# I
0641160017 FirstEnergy

- Salnmis Station BOlO Opacity 100 % DT 100 % DT 100**~/o** DT 

### I BOll Opacity 100 % DT 100 % DT 100 % DT

1 B012 Opacity 1000/0DT 100 0 /oDT 100**~/o** DT 

### I I B013 Opacity 100 0 10 DT 100 % DT 1 00**~/o** DT 

### II ! B014 CO (lbhnlnBtu) 22.73 % EE I i 0671010028 Glatfelter BOIS CO (lbhnmBtu) 22.73 % EE I 

### i P801 S02 (lb/hr) 47.18 % DT 38.50 % DT
0679000251 Belden Brick COlnpany P802 S02 (lb/lu 4
) 47.18 % DT 38.50 % DT
P803 S02 (lb/hr) 47.18 % DT 38.50 % DT



## Page 3 of 4II d 

# EAR il il 

### II Prelnise Facility Nalne Elnissions Unit Paralneter 1 st Quarter 2011 4 th Quarter 2010 3 I'd Quarter 20 11 II ID 11 

### I,
NOx (lb/hr) 19.88 % EE 67.89 % DT 22.58 % DT I BOOI 44.99 % EE 14.22 % EE NOx (lb/mlnBtu) 67.89 % DT 22.58 % DT 0819750245 Anderson's Ethanol 67.89 % DT 22.580/0DT NOx (lb/hr) 19.88 % EE B002 44.99 % EE 14.22 % EE NOx (lb/lnmBtu) 67.890/0DT 22.58**~/o** DT
1431350817 E.I. Dupont De Nelnours 

### & Co. POOl S02 (lb/ton acid prod) 100 %DT

Emissions Unit ID

, 0278000463 IWCI Steel, Warrren 

# I B001 Opacity
0448010035 ISunoco TerminaL, Toledo 

# I J001 THC (pPln)
P902 S02 (lb/hr) 0773000182 IHaverhill North Coke COlnpany I P902 Hg (lb/hr)
1667000007 IOmnova Solutions 

### I P004 

### I THC (lb/hr) 

# I B003 

# I Opacity 1677010757 IAkron Thennal, L.P. B004 Opacity r;E .:= C?:'A1S recorded excess 

### enlission.,;



## Page 4 of 4 6.19 % EE

29.84 % DT
11.80 % DT 

### 36.96**~/oDT** 9.56 % DT


### t 0.55**~/~** OT
25.60 % DT
55.51 % DT
55.51 % DT