alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1

[LETTERHEAD OF Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. APPEARS HERE]


                               November 4, 1999


CuraGen Corporation
555 Long Wharf Drive
New Haven, CT 06511

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     We have acted as counsel to CuraGen Corporation, a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), in connection with the preparation and filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission of a Registration Statement on Form S-3 (the
"Registration Statement"), pursuant to which the Company is registering under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, a total of 1,635,366 shares (the
"Shares") of its common stock, $.01 par value per share (the "Common Stock"),
for resale to the public. The Shares are to be sold by the selling stockholders
identified in the Registration Statement. This opinion is being rendered in
connection with the filing of the Registration Statement. All capitalized terms
used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the respective meanings given
to them in the Registration Statement.

     In connection with this opinion, we have examined the Company's Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated By-Laws, both as
currently in effect, such other records of the corporate proceedings of the
Company and certificates of the Company's officers as we have deemed relevant,
and the Registration Statement and the exhibits thereto.

     In our examination, we have assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the
legal capacity of natural persons, the authenticity of all documents submitted
to us as originals, the conformity to original documents of all documents
submitted to us as certified, photostatic or facsimile copies and the
authenticity of the originals of such copies.

     Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that (i) the Shares have
been duly and validly authorized by the Company and (ii) the Shares, when sold,
will be duly and validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable shares of the
Common Stock.

     Our opinion is limited to the General Corporation Laws of The State of
Delaware, and we express no opinion with respect to the laws of any other
jurisdiction. No opinion is expressed herein with respect to the qualification
of the Shares under the securities or blue sky laws of any state or any foreign
jurisdiction.

     We understand that you wish to file this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement, and we hereby consent thereto.


                                 Very truly yours,


                                 /s/ Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris,
                                 Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.


                                 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris,
                                 Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1675 

To amend certain appropriations Acts to repeal the requirement directing 

the Administrator of General Services to sell Federal property and assets 

that support the operations of the Plum Island Animal Disease Center 

in Plum Island, New York, to provide for a report on the potential 

transfer of Plum Island, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2015 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. MURPHY, and Mrs. GILLIBRAND) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend certain appropriations Acts to repeal the requirement directing the Administrator of General Services 

to sell Federal property and assets that support the 

operations of the Plum Island Animal Disease Center 

in Plum Island, New York, to provide for a report on 

the potential transfer of Plum Island, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1675 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Plum Island Conserva3 tion Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT TO SELL CERTAIN FED5 ERAL PROPERTY IN PLUM ISLAND, NEW 

6 YORK. 

7 (a) REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT IN PUBLIC LAW 110– 

8 329.—Section 540 of the Department of Homeland Secu9 rity Appropriations Act, 2009 (division D of Public Law 

10 110–329; 122 Stat. 3688) is repealed. 

11 (b) REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT IN PUBLIC LAW 112– 

12 74.—Section 538 of the Department of Homeland Secu13 rity Appropriations Act, 2012 (6 U.S.C. 190 note; division 

14 D of Public Law 112–74) is repealed. 

15 SEC. 3. REPORT ON POTENTIAL TRANSFER OF PLUM IS16 LAND. 

17 Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 

18 of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in con19 junction with the Administrator of General Services, the 

20 Secretary of the Interior, and the Administrator of the 

21 Environmental Protection Agency, shall submit to the ap22 propriate committees of Congress a report that includes— 

23 (1) recommendations for the transfer of admin24 istrative jurisdiction over Plum Island from the De25 partment of Homeland Security to the Federal agen26 cy that is most capable of conserving the undevelVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:31 Jun 30, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1675.IS S1675

smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1675 IS

1 oped land, critical habitat, vulnerable and rare spe2 cies, and historic, cultural, and other environmental 

3 resources of Plum Island; and 

4 (2) an analysis of any remediation responsibil5 ities with respect to Plum Island, the costs associ6 ated with assuming administrative jurisdiction over 

7 Plum Island, the timing of the transfer, and the 

8 need for any legislative changes to execute the trans9 fer. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
.:• 7 -. • . t, .1

14P1/10i

.40000.00,

*

. .

-• • '4r • • • •

-:;-";

•

•-•

- ' • " '•• %4 •••: • 4: 4 4, • 4 - 

irmikwysamis.A. : n.% ! 

':) ',

•:" • 49'; ; • ;

"

spompoopoitiotio

- c '

„ t• '•=N

-gut

w •

‘nn.: • ;;7::

•

"!:. • r

.

-13WW1Pillir t

! k:r 'f'.1i;•••

.

•*.; t:,,' ••'‘

:

t • .4 .

WA**101","

,;1,•:V:•••

4 ;;'

••

•

•

'

• •

S.

•

: A

• "7

omits*

tY;

ti?

•
^^^C:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

   We hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus constituting part of this
Registration Statement on Form S-1 of our report dated March 22, 1999, except
for the last paragraph of Note 7 which is as of August 10, 1999, relating to
the financial statements of eMed Technologies Corporation, which appears in
such Prospectus. We also consent to the application of such report to the
Financial Statement Schedule for the three years ended December 31, 1998 listed
under Item 16(b) of this Registration Statement when such schedule is read in
conjunction with the financial statements referred to in our report. The audits
referred to in such report also included this schedule. We also consent to the
reference to us under the headings "Experts" in such Prospectus.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
August 18, 1999
# CE2004088EN.01054801.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/548 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/548

---

(2004/C 88 E/0558)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0889/04

by Nelly Maes (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(22 March 2004)

Subject:   Elections in Iran

Subject:

The recent elections in Iran were a travesty of democracy. Most of the independent candidates were disqualified by the religious council, demonstrating once again that it is all-powerful. Despite this intervention, the elections nonetheless went ahead. This shows that the so-called reformists in Iran have achieved nothing.

The European Commission has defended dialogue with Iran as a means of promoting human rights and democracy.

What conclusions does the Commission draw from recent events as far as dialogue with the Iranian authorities is concerned?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(28 April 2004)

(28 April 2004)

In its February 2004 conclusions, the Council expressed its deep regret and disappointment that large numbers of candidates were discriminated against in their prevention from standing in the 20 February 2004 parliamentary elections in Iran. The Council expressed the hope that Iran would return to the path of reform and de]mocratisation.

The Commission shares the above sentiment and believes that the flawed elections had a negative impact on the overall climate in the EU's relations with Iran. Further reflection and analysis is needed to calibrate the precise approach towards Iran against the background of this setback in the democratic process. The Commission nevertheless continues to believe that a re-establishment of the Comprehensive Dialogue is in the EU's interest. It notes, inter alia, that the specific Human Rights dialogue launched in December 2002 has yielded some small yet tangible results and believes that — despite its difficulties — it should be given a further opportunity.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intermagnetics General Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the year ending February 23, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael K. Burke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Michael K. Burke
----------------------------
Michael K. Burke
Chief Financial Officer
April 09, 2003
JOEL KELLEY MIMS, FORMER

HUSBAND

,

Appellant,

v.

ROCHELLE LYNN MIMS,

FORMER WIFE

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 5141

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 12, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. James M. Colaw , Judge

.

Marci D. Silver, Gainesville , for Appellant.

Rochelle Lynn Mims, pro se , Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS

, C.J., ROWE and MAKAR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 42



### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 07/17 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                          15,666
<SECURITIES>                                    24,119
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,953
<ALLOWANCES>                                       557
<INVENTORY>                                      7,006
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,037
<PP&E>                                          11,005
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,801
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,492
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,247
<BONDS>                                          1,018
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           235
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,492
<SALES>                                         69,369
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,369
<CGS>                                           61,376
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,158
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  61
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,247)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,247)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,247)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     ($.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   ($.75)


</TABLE>
7 

REF ID:A275*69 

,... 

-i 'f \~ ;r 1 

6th February, 1 Jl+J+. 

Dear ~<t' ;i.g.#1\ , rv~ 

J,,any thanks. r'o.c your letter of JBIJJJJ!JI'y 14th and i"or 

your good vinhe<i ior 191.ilt-. l was ve~J glad ~ ... a hear fr 001 you and 

that you had been l.'1.blc to see i:-.:n.TSIEY Fllld R0.&E. 

I think that L:i..eut. :3ARASCH was probably ref'erring to 

some ?l-r68 me<.:lsni a.bout a vessel carrying oode~h1ch vra.:::. sunk. 

The rcferenc.e :hers iJ£ the 111esuaget::. m 1pe::.t1 are K 3150 

(11764), K 328 (6664), K 3225 (116,58), K 3151 71)73), 30.30 (4B08J'" 

i:itripped texto o:f all theoc r--esse.~es were ':lent to .ruu:J:ID'.J.UN, .... o 

I .i.mag:me you will be able to get hold of th&m. I'm ai'ra.1d 1ve 

bnve no useful coinmi:;lJ.ts to Inake on thes~ decodes but naturally 

we i:..hould he most intex en.ted ii you. th:Lnk there lll."e e:ny sigro.f' .Lcru1t 

concluE>ions to be drrom fro!>! them and from ru;y data on this subjec.t 

7h:!..c.h J01.1. rw:y '1.ave. 

I a.111 iniieed glad to hear that ,'{enger LS better. I 

hope he wJJ l JJ.Ot return to 1ork before he is reully :fit a,gam, 

but I should certainly like to see him when I come to ,{ a.shJ.ng;i;on. 

I am wry much look:u1g forwat.'d to my V:LsJ.t and to seeing you all 

aeain then. 

I'ro:f essor ff. F. 1''r1e11roan, 

t (... -:;'11nt-ton 

With oll beet wishes, , .... r"~, f, •.ii Ji. 1 , ,,.-zl-;-, ~ 

.... 

j.4~~-<!.~ 

'I~ 7 

Zw~4~ 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
Department of Energy 

Washington, D.C. 

John M. Allen 

Director, Flight Standards Service 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Dear Mr. Allen: 

May 9, 2012, 2012 

/f./l I'' V ' l~o . ,··ahl ,It'.-,! i) r') -... 

' t-·' .,:: j I 

Please extend Exemption No. 8775a, reference Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2006-25092, 

through August 31, 2014. 

The Basis for Our Request 

This exemption to 14 CFR Part 91.209, Use of Position Lights, paragraphs (a) (1) and (b), 

permits the Department of Energy (DOE) contractor, G4S Government Solutions, Inc. DBA, 

WSI-SRS, to operate two DOE-owned BK-117 helicopters, at night, without exterior-aircraft 

lighting. On these Public Aircraft Operation (PAO) missions, WSI-SRS aircrews use Night 

Vision Goggles (NVG) at altitudes between 300 feet and 500 feet above ground level (AGL) on 

exercises and actual security response missions to protect the critical national security assets at 

the DOE Savannah River Site (SRS). 

The SRS is located 12 miles south of Aiken, South Carolina along the Savanna River. The 

airspace above SRS is not restricted, BUT IS DEPICTED ON THE Atlanta Sectional with a 

Notice to Airmen with cautions for transiting the area (please see Enclosure, or the following uri: 

http:l/skvvector.com/?11=33.2918194 7806431 .-81.57 408613634655&chart=29&zoom=3). 

The reasons, conditions and limitations that were the basis for granting the original exemption 

have not changes. This petition remains justified relative to public interest, safety and national 

security considerations. 

Our Request 

Please grant this petition and extend Exemption No. 8775A through August 21, 2014 and 

reissue to the U.S. DOE. Please contact me at 202-586-5532, or Mr. David Lopez, 202-586-

6177, email David.Lopez@hq.doe.gov, for further information. 

Glen F. Wattman 

Director, Office of Aviation Management 

U.S. Department of Energy 

1000 Independence Ave. S.W. 

Washington, DC 20585 
Enclosures 

Cc: 

Mr. Tommy Johnson 

Mr. Anthony T. Hatfield 

1. Trip Manifest 

2. Draft Itinerary 

2 
Sky Vector: Flight Planning I Aeronautical Charts 

Flight Plan 

Portions licensed by iFlightPrep"' 'US Patent 7,640,098 

Copyright © 2012 SkyVector® About Us Privacy 

Page 1 of 1 

m ·~ 

http:/lskyvector.com/?11=33.29181947806431 ,-81.57408613634655&chart=2... 5/9/2012
Samsung S1 Order Sheet



 Exhibit 10.13 
 

 
  
 Order Sheet

 Samsung S1 Co., Ltd. 
 TEL. 02-2131-8768 FAX. 02-2131-8729 
 Sep 01, 2008 
 Number of Order 
 SMART NO. 20080901-01 
 Date of Order 
 September 1, 2008 
 Recipient 
 e-Smart Korea, Inc. 
 Reference 
 Jung, Seung-young 
 Samsung S1 Co., Ltd. 
 168 Sunhwa-Dong, Jung-Gu, Seoul, Korea 
 Price: NINETY NINE THOUSAND WON (KRW 99,000) 
 NO 
 1

 Name of Product 
 Fingerprint Super Smart Test Card 
 Size 
 Unit 
 EA

 Quantity 
 3 
 Unit Price 
 33,000 
 Price 
 99,000 
 Total

 99,000 
 Reference: 1. Date of Delivery: September 2, 2008 
 2. Address of Delivery: Samsung S1, 168 Sunhwa-Dong,
Jung-Gu, Seoul, Korea 
 Tel: 2131-8768 







 

 
  
 I swear
that the attached translation is true to the original. 
 01. Sep., 2008 
 Signature Chung Kyung Won 
 Registered No. 2008 – 2222 
 Notarial Certificate 
 Chung, kyung-won personally appeared before me confirmed that the attached translation is true to the original and subscribed his (her)
name. This is hereby attested on this 01 day of Sep., 2008 at this office. 
 Law & Notary Office Inc. Seoul-Jeil
642-19, Yeoksam-dong, Gangnam-ku, Seoul, Korea. 
 Attorney-at-Law 
 Hyuk-Jung Kwon 
 This office has been authorized by the Minister of Justice, the Republic of Korea, to act as Notary Public since Feb. 1th 2005, under Law NO. 2005-4. 







 

 
  
 DELIVERY
RECEIPT 
 Delivered Product 
 Fingerprint Super Smart Test Card: 3 EA 
 The above product has been duly
received. 
 September 1, 2008 
 SUPPLIER: e-Smart Korea Inc. Chang-sik Park 
 ACCEPTOR: Samsung S1 Co., Ltd.
Jung-hyun Lee 
 Chung Kyung Won 







 

 
  
 I swear
that the attached translation is true to the original. 
 02. Sep., 2008 
 Signature Chung Kyung Won 
 Registered No. 2008 – 2231 
 Notarial Certificate 
 Chung, Kyung-Won personally appeared before me confirmed that the attached translation is true to the original and subscribed his(her)
name. This is hereby attested on this 02 day of Sep., 2008 at this office. 
 Law & Notary Office Inc. Seoul-Jeil
642-19, Yeoksam-dong, Gangnam-ku, Seoul, Korea. 
 Attorney-at-Law 
 Jae Yang Song 
 This office has been authorized by the Minister of Justice, the Republic of Korea, to act as Notary Public since Feb. 1th 2005, under Law NO. 2005-4.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-3192

___________________________ J.S. Haren Company lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Fairfield Service Company of Indiana, LLC lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Hot Springs

____________ Submitted: September 21, 2020 Filed: September 24, 2020 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Fairfield Services Company of Indiana appeals the adverse judgment entered by the district court 1 following a bench trial in a diversity action raising claims under

1 The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.Arkansas state law. Upon careful review, we conclude the district court did not err

in determining that the equipment supplied by Fairfield was defective, that Fairfield failed to timely cure the nonconformities, and that the buyer’s revocation of acceptance was timely and appropriate. See United States v. Missouri, 535 F.3d 844, 848 (8th Cir. 2008) (in appeal from civil bench trial, findings of fact are reviewed for clear error, conclusions of law and mixed questions of law and fact are reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
'; ; o.ax. ,, ~ ........-----------i-----t- ~ 
..... REF ID:A65908 

~ote: These colletes have one or roore persons interestea an.d/or 

qualify iil research in the srecial field indicated. 

Uorthwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 

St. Ambroee College, Davenport, Iowa 

Southwestern Louisiana Institute, Lafayette, Louisip..na 

:Boston 'Jniversity, :Soston, .. essachusetts 

!!a.ssachusetts Institute of Technoloe;;r, Ja.mbridge, I!ass. 

·rentworth Institute, :Boston, ~te.ss • 

.tashill€ton University, St. Lotlis, t'issouri 

University of Nebraska., Lincol:l., ~ebraska 

University o:t '.N'ew }Texico, Albuquerque, 'New ! e:rloo 

Clar~son College of ~echnology, Potsdam, ~ew Tork Ile~ ~ork University, ~ew Yor£, F. Y. 

University o:f I"orth D~ota., Grand Forks, lT. Daf'kota 

Case Institute of Technology, Clevela...~d, Ohio 

University of Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh, Penna. 

Southern Hethodist university, DaJ.las, Texas 

University of Virginia, Cli.e.rlottsville, Va. 

Virginia ?olytech..~ic Institute, Blacl:sburg, Va. 
• REF ID:A65908 

CRYPTA.."T.ALYSIS 

Note: These colleges he.ve one or nore persons interested and/or ~tw.lify in research tn the special field indicated. 

University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 

Illinois College, Jaci<:sonville, Illinois 

University of Chicaeo, Chicaeo, Illinois 

:Bowdoin Colle&e, :Brunsuick, ~ia.ine 

University of llalyla.nd, College Pc.ri.:, !Iar:rla.nd. 

Clark University, Worcester, :!a.ss~chusetts 

1.ichigan St1>te Oollege, Ea.st Lansing, m.chige,.n 

Dartmouth College, Han.over, New P'.ampshire 

St. Peter's College of li.rts & Sciences, Jersey City, !.J'. 

:-ew i"Iexioo School of .13.ning & Technology, Socorro, i:r. I:.e::dco 

Brooklyn College, Broo41yn, r. Y. 

Clarkson College of Technology, Potsdam, ~. Y. 

Fordham University, ~ew 7or~, r.Y. 

Hunter College, lil'ew York:, :,. • Y. 

Q.ueens College of the City o:f !Tew Yorlr, Flusnine, :r. Y. 

New York State IIa.riti.me College, ?t. Scheyler, r. Y. 

City College of the City of ~ew York, Uew Yor~, r. Y. 

State College of Agriculture & Ent.ineering of the University of 

Nort'h. Oa.rolina, Raleigh, N. Carolina 

University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio 

Pennsylva:iia State College, State College, Penna. 

Mary '1ashi:ngton College of the Uni vers1 ty of Virginia., FrederiC.:i:sburg, Va.. 

Wh1 tman College, Ualla ~iaJ.la., Wasni:ngton