alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                 Exhibit 23.3

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report, dated March 29, 2000 on United Europe, Inc. (f/k/a UIH
Europe, Inc.) included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, into the following
previously filed Registration Statements of UnitedGlobalCom, Inc. (f/k/a United
International Holdings, Inc.):

  .  Registration Statement No. 33-81876 on Form S-8, effective 7/22/94
  .  Registration Statement No. 333-00226 on Form S-8, effective 1/9/96
  .  Registration Statement No. 333-68641 on Form S-8, effective 12/9/98
  .  Registration Statement No. 333-71963 on Form S-8, effective 2/8/99
  .  Registration Statement No. 333-88085 on Form S-8, effective 9/29/99
  .  Registration Statement No. 333-90997 on Form S-3, effective 11/19/99


                                      ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Denver, Colorado
March 29, 2000
REF ID :~66810-· 

10 1•'br\ar1 1955 

~·JOR DlRIC'lUl 

8ubJect: COMm SUppl.emeut to Part XI· ot the Bepc>rt ot the 

. ~ehnoJ.osical C.pabU1t1ea Puael. 

fteterencet USClll: 13.2/29 

l a. 'l'.b.e Technologioal Ca:pabil1t1ea Panel (!Cf'); a •}'18C1&l. 

eubccmdttee ot ~ Sc1ent.U1c Mriao17 Canaitt.ee, lxac\lt1Te Of'ttce · 

ot the Prea1dent1 vu establilhed 1D A.Uguat 19~ at the requeat ot 

the Preaicleut to comider all 80UJ'C• aterial ill dMl sng with the 

problem o.t tbe 'dangers ot a surpriae a~ on 'the United Sta.tea. 

2.• · ~ Cbairnan at the TCP, D:r. Jams R. llllian, eeta.bliabad 

av.be<mlitteeo or working ~ to exaa1Da tbne specUic wee.ai 

( l.) •trW.D& :paver 

(2) detenatn 'POver 

(3) intelligence . 

c. Tile a11iberab1p ot each or tb8ae ll"CMlPlt 111 9bovn in 

JAclo•ure i be~. 

- 2. Dr. John s. 'l.Uk.e:(1 a 1l8lllber ot ~ group deal'og vith 1.lxtell.:lpnce, 

recent~ pve me the band.written draft ot the subJ•ct COMlll.r SU~ 

to the Report of ~·TCP, Yitll the request "that it be tn>ed iii a total Gr 

•1x copies. Ona copy he wished to be :read onl.1' by aud1 bigb.•level BM 

pu-eon:ael as ahoUl.ci read tbB clQcumeut on a need-to•knov buia. The 

r..Unillg copies are to be kept wt.11 their diatribution should be 

41rectecl by Dr. IO.llian or 80D8 otber Dl8d>er of tbe 'J.'CP autbor1sed to 

1D4icate their c1.iatr:l.'but1ou. 

tbat l8l 

3. Dr. 

reader• 

!l'Ukey 

of 

indicated 

the aub4'eot·report 

that he-voul.d 

De:/' 

be 

care 

glad 

to .ato have ca 

aD;Y 

it aDd. 

~ 

tmt 

be vould aee to it. tbat tbo8e e~t• "1CW.d go to the proper peo.pl.e vbo 

·Jd&ht be concerned vith them. - . 4. I llOUld liJr.e to diacua• vs.th· JOU t.lle aubJect report &Dd. S.ta. 

d.1.Rribution. · 

2 Incl.It 

a/a ~ -. --,,.- ... 

... ,, ; ... _.. ' 

-

. ·. . WII.J.'WI F. J'llitJWI 

· . $peed.al Aaa1sta.rlt · 

Declassified and approve_d for release by NSA on 10-29-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
REF ID:A66810 

Direc'tar ot Special Subco-1.ttee' . 1 .... a. nll1aD 

Deputy Director ot Special SubCODlllit.tee: 

James B. Piek 

Consultant for ISC .. Bo'bert Sprague 

-Subcommittee fl (&o.iect 1) 

... ball Ba~ 

. :aob«tt Jeltr.er 

Reuben Net;tlel' 

ln>at PJ.easet 

W1l.Uu Stratton - Ju.Uan Veat 

Carroll Zimmema.n 

Steve.rt llight 

SW>c-ttee #2 (Project 2) 

Lel&D4 He.worth 

Evar4 Darlov 

Daniel Dustin _ 

llichard Emberson 

Albert. 0. Rill 

RocJr:wa.y McMillan 

Herbert ScO"lille 

Merle Tune · 

Subcommittee #3 (Pro3ect 3) 

Ed.win land,, Cba1rm4 

James G. Balter 

Joaepb. Km:medy 

AUu l&tba.m JJ:. 

Ed.Yin Purcell 

John s. Tuke;y 

: _ ~ I J • •-' ~: •, '-' ,... • -
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intermagnetics General Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending February 23, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Glenn H. Epstein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Glenn H. Epstein
----------------------------
Glenn H. Epstein
Chief Executive Officer
April  09, 2003
# CE2004088EN.01046601.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/466 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/466

---

(2004/C 88 E/0479)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3517/03

by Baroness Sarah Ludford (ELDR) to the Commission

(25 November 2003)

Subject:   Fair trade

Subject:

Would it be considered as discriminatory under EU public procurement regulations to stipulate that Fair Trade products must be used in public tenders for catering services?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(8 January 2004)

(8 January 2004)

Once a contracting authority has decided on the subject matter of the procurement contract intended for its catering services (what generic type of products to buy), it is free to define the technical specifications of those products. The requirements must, however, relate to the characteristics or performance of the products (e.g., glasses or plates made out of recycled material) or the production of the products (e.g. organically grown ones).

A contracting authority wishing to procure Fair-trade products (meaning products certified using standards set by the private Fair-trade Labelling Organisations International) for catering services must define the technical specifications of the products in relation to the social or environmental performances underlying the label. While the contracting authority may indicate that products having that label are deemed to comply with the technical specifications, it must also allow economic operators to prove compliance with the technical specifications by other means of proof. Only on a case by case basis it can be determined which of Fair-trade's diverse standards (or parts thereof) describe the characteristics or performance of the product to be purchased.

Contracting authorities procuring goods must respect the fundamental Community principles, including the principle of equal treatment, of which non-discrimination is a specific expression. It follows from established case law of the European Court of Justice that not only acts of de jure discrimination are prohibited under the EC Treaty, but also acts which hinder non-nationals more than nationals (de facto discrimination).

Due to the wide range of standards comprised by the Fair-trade label and the wide range of products available in the catering business, it is only possible on a case by case basis, taking into account all circumstances surrounding the purchase, to determine whether a contracting authority infringes upon the principle of non-discrimination.

---
Exhibit 15
April 12, 2002

C-COR.net Corp.
State College, Pennsylvania


Re:  Registration Statements on Form S-3 and Form S-8

With respect to the subject registration statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-82697,
333-87909, 333-90011, 333-90589, 333-32676 and 333-75888) and on Form S-8 (Nos.
2-95959, 33-27440, 33-35208, 33-66590, 333-02505, 333-30982, 333-43592,
333-49826, 333-61226, 333-64040, 333-65805 and 333-89067), we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated April 12, 2002 related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


/s/ KPMG LLP
-------------------------
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Cause Number: 01

- 20

- 00777

- CV

Trial Court Cause

Number: 2019

- 57418

Style: Nationwide C oin & Bullion Reserve, Inc. and Dallas Paskell, Turner Jones, Lawrence

Kuykendall and Melida Jones

v

. William Ciarlone

Date moti on filed : August 9, 2022

Type of mot ion: Motion to Extend Word Limit for Response to Motion for Rehearing En Banc

Party filing motion: Appellee William Ciarlone

Ordered tha t motion is:

Granted

Other:

Should a ppellant s Nationwide Coin & Bullion Res erve, Inc. and Dallas Paskell, Turner J o nes, Lawrence

Kuykendall, and Melida Jones choose to f ile a reply to the motion for rehearing en banc , th e reply may

contain an additional 1,000 words.

Judge's signature: /s / Peter Kelly

Acting individually

Date: August 1 1 , 2022
. ,. 

R. ~oit­

~·'~ 

COMMENTS ON TCP REPORT 

I do not believe that this is the last we'll hear of any of 

the TCP's recommendations. 

The.TCP gives a st:rong endorsement of the "Robertson Report." 

Someone might get the idea that it's time for an accounting on 

each of the recommendations made. The Director ought to be forewarned of this possibility. 

In this regard, the TCP stressed: 

,_ 1. Quantification of indicato:r,s. 

.r· .~ ..... ,.,,4 2. Use of mOdern psychometric techniques~ 

t·'""q.-~ 

r·:i.o 

r·,JJ 

3. A career service in COMINT for Air Force and Army 

personnel. 

4. Serious attention to 11 e.noma.lous" propagation. 

5. Provision of integral.D/F facilities. 

6. Equipments for detection and reception of naval 

communications ~stems. 

7. Provision or analytic support at the intercept sites. 

*** 

Recommendation 4 is somewhat consistent with o~ of the 

recommendations in Dr. Wilks' Trip Report. 

*** 

Recommendation 5, for clandestine COMINT operations, is consistent 

with some recent USCIB discussions. 

*** 

Recommendation 6 is consistent with field commanders' desire to 

smooth the way for their rec~fption of COMINT (TACOMINT) of immediate 

operational value. ( · _ . 

*** 

Can secure experimental techniques be devised to test directly 

Russia1s penetration of our COMINT~ 

eclassifi ed and a 

/() ~.b. 
--;-- - ··-- - ---------:-------------------------:------- -

---- -------------------- ---·,.----- _____________ .,... _________ _ -----:-----=.----- ---.----------

----- --.------------------------!·------·-----~------- -- --

-· ---------- ----- ---------------~-------- -------------.-----------

- _______________ _. _____ -----;----------------------·-------------------------· 

----- ---.----------

-----:----- -----------------------------------.------ _ _. _________ _:_ ·------------- -----~-- ·----

--------- .... -.---- ------------- ----------------- -------- ------- - - -

. . ----- -----------------· ----------- ----,-------------~---- -- ---- _______ __._ ___________ _ 

I --- ___ .., ,___ ----------- --------- ___ .,, __ -
.. 

MEMO ROUTING SLIP i:F N~~~!~"~~i.~~s~g::i::Ls. I NAME OR TITLE INITIALS CIRCULATE 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION DATE COORDINATION 

2 FILE 

- INFORMATION 

a - NECESSARY 

ACTION 

NOTE AND RETURN 

4 SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

REMARKS 

II"' o 'flu ~ "'~lit.WI.Mr ( ,.~: ti·~-'-·~) ,_ 

...,.~ •"tr '1-t·s 9.tM. - l+"rTN ~ Mr. F. 

'l./ ..ct..:~: 1 - No~ t 'I S" t YA~~ 1..r; ,/ 4&-J"!:J 

a. /f)oft o c.. t.A-Jlto l.tas :s~e..., 

f.1S"1 I -t. I.ti. fJ'°tA.f0 #4k,,,,.,,. 4 64 T ~s A &.e.e ~~ .. w ... ·---~,~~ F Mot .t WO 

, ,.:...: r 7o ~ '-/. c. w. S"'" ~ t°k Mof '"' r 

')1 It, Vs. C}".-4:r.rT.r t/ ~.,. 1:1, ,.,_A ,t;t~"9e {, ~.!1.r 

S•U It ~'' pos,f10.., 4 ~ d 1 l""1 J.f,~ 7k "'~#fl /14.,., F, -··----....- .. -- - ' ... ~ - - ~ -- -----

..:¥11. fi'"'"""'" '"" i ... ..,~J(,se.'' rff«.,..,,, r~p 

(J.V'O •lfleJ 6rfAM1 ... f.e._dlj "°,,,' ,, ~. I 

FROM NAME OR TITLE DATE 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION TELEPHONE 

' -

DD FORM 9 5 Replaoes DA AGO Form 895, 1 Apr 48, and AFHQ I FEB liO Form 12, 10 Nov 47, which may be used.
**Exhibit
      10.23**





BPO
                  Management Services
                1200
                  - 330 Portage Ave.
                Winnipeg,
                  MB R3C 0C4
                Tel:
                  204.957.1885
                Fax:
                  204.989-0317
                www.adapsys.ca
                
                **ISO
                  9001 Certified**




February
      28, 2007







James
      Buchanan


James
      Buchanan, Arlene Buchanan and


John
      Davidson as trustees to The Buchanan Family Trust


Arlene
      Buchanan


c/o
      Novus
      Imaging Solutions Inc.


1741
      Wellington Avenue


Winnipeg,
      Manitoba


R3H
      0G1




Attention:
      Mr. James Buchanan




Dear
      Jim:




**Re:**
            **Stock
                Purchase Agreement made September 22, 2006 between BPO Management
                Services, Inc. (“BPOMS” or the “Buyer”), Novus Imaging Solutions Inc.
                (“Company”) and the addressees of this letter (the “Sellers”) (the “Stock
                Purchase Agreement”)**





This
      letter is in furtherance to our recent discussions regarding BPOMS’ progress in
      arranging financing for certain strategic acquisitions and the payments owing
      to
      you under the Stock Purchase Agreement. I have outlined to you the current
      status of the financing process and the anticipated closing. If you have any
      further questions in this regard, please let Patrick Dolan, Jim Cortens or
      me
      know.




Based
      on
      those discussions, we have agreed to extend the date for payments under the
      Stock Purchase Agreement. (Capitalized terms used in this letter which are
      not
      defined herein will have the same meanings as in the Stock Purchase
      Agreement.)




Accordingly,
      this letter will confirm that the Stock Purchase Agreement will be amended
      such
      that the $200,000 instalment of the Cash Purchase Price and the $767,073
      instalment (which includes both the $500,000 portion of the Cash Purchase Price
      and the price increase of $267,073 to reflect the amount by which Current Assets
      exceeded Current Liabilities as of Closing) will be paid on the earlier of
      the
      date of completion of the Financing and April 30, 2007. All other terms of
      the
      Stock Purchase Agreement will remain the same, including the provision that
      interest at 9% per annum will continue to run on the $967,073 instalment from
      January 1, 2007.














To
      confirm your agreement with the foregoing, would you please sign and return
      a
      copy of this letter. Thank you for your cooperation.




Regards.









Brian
      Meyer




cc:
      John
      Davidson







**ACCEPTED
      AND AGREED** :







**_____________________________________**


James
      Buchanan on behalf of all Sellers




Page
          2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court Cause No. DA 19 - 0 678 SUNSET IRRIGATION DISTRICTK CAROLYN R. MACK AND CHRISS A. MACK,

Claimants and Appellees, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE); GLENDA F. ANDERSON; JIMMY A. ANDERSON; JOHN ANDERSON; ROWDY ANDERSON,

Objectors and Appellants.

ORDER UPON MOTION of

the Objectors , with no objection from the Cl aimants , and with good cause appearing; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for the filing of Objector ’s Brief is extended, with the new deadline for filing being July 15, 2020 .

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 10 2020

04/10/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0678
exv10w6






Exhibit 10.6




AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





     This Amendment (“Amendment”) is made as of October 7, 2008 to the Employment Agreement
(“Agreement”) dated as of the 12th day of December 2007 between Alkermes, Inc., a Pennsylvania
corporation (the “Company”), and David A. Broecker (“Executive”).



     WHEREAS, the Company and Executive have entered into the Agreement and now wish to amend
certain terms of the Agreement pursuant to this Amendment (capitalized terms used but not defined
herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement);



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained and
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,
the parties agree as follows:



     1. The second sentence of Section 5(b)(i) of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety
and replaced with a new sentence which shall read as follows: “The Severance Amount shall be paid
out in substantially equal bi-weekly installments over eighteen (18) months, in arrears beginning
on the first payroll date that occurs after thirty-five (35) days from the Date of Termination.”



     2. The phrase “on the Date of Termination” shall be inserted into Section 6(b)(i) of the
Agreement as follows: “If within twenty-four (24) months after a Change in Control occurs, the
Executive’s employment is terminated by the Company without Cause as provided in Subparagraph 4(d)
or the Executive terminates his employment for Good Reason as provided in Subparagraph 4(e), then,
the Company shall pay Executive a lump sum in cash on the Date of Termination equal to the sum
of...”



     3. Except as specifically amended herein, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect in accordance with their terms.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment effective on the date and year
first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	ALKERMES, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	David
A. Broecker 	 
	 	 	Title: 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 /s/
David
A. Broecker	 
	 	David A. Broecker
# CE2004078EN.01064003.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/640 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/640

---

(2004/C 78 E/0677)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3754/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject:   Update on use of funding from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of Livorno

Subject:

In its answer to question E-1020/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Livorno had submitted projects and secured funding under the 2000 City Twinning Programme, the Commission stated that no funding had been granted for the year 2000.

1

Can the Commission say whether the municipality has submitted any projects and obtained and used any funding in the budget years since then?

---

(1)  OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 208.

1

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by 
reference in this registration statement of our report dated February 9, 1998 
included in Nitinol Medical Technologies, Inc.'s Form 10-K for the year ended 
December 31, 1997 and to all references to our Firm included in this 
registration statement.



                                                  /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
                                                  -----------------------
                                                  Arthur Andersen LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
November 11, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-04-1998             MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                         648,000                 618,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               28,690,000              25,125,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   966,000                 892,000
<INVENTORY>                                 27,202,000              24,974,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            61,024,000              55,141,000
<PP&E>                                      91,179,000              84,946,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              51,191,000              47,203,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             112,346,000             104,543,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       25,744,000              24,698,000
<BONDS>                                     27,294,000              23,529,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       112,000                 112,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  51,903,000              49,981,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               112,346,000             104,543,000
<SALES>                                     42,125,000              37,445,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            42,125,000              37,445,000
<CGS>                                       28,442,000              24,465,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,442,000              24,465,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             481,000                 415,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,486,000               3,449,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,290,000               1,276,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,196,000               2,173,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,196,000               2,173,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25                    0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24                    0.23
        

</TABLE>