alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                            5297
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       22
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  5319
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5319
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               49
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        5269
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5319
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   207
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    86
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    121
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                121
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       121
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.57


</TABLE>
# CE2004078EN.01090801.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/908 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/908

---

(2004/C 78 E/0960)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-4063/03

by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(13 January 2004)

Subject:   Workers on one-day contracts

Subject:

The Greek organisations OPAP and ODIE have employed workers for a great many years on ‘one-day contracts’, i.e. they have renewed their contracts every day for between 5 and 20 years. The outcome of this strategy is that the workers are unable to enjoy their basic labour and social security rights, such as maternity leave and benefit, on the grounds given by the social security organisations that they are working on one-day contracts. These employment contracts are in flagrant violation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, Community legislation such as Directives 1999/70/EC (1), 76/207/EEC (2), 86/613/EEC (3) and 92/85/EEC (4), and of the case-law of the Court of Justice.

1

2

3

4

Does the Commission consider such employment contracts to be acceptable? What measures will it take to enable the above workers to enjoy all their labour rights? Can the provisions of Directive 1999/70/EC be applied to those workers?

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(13 February 2004)

(13 February 2004)

Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP is applicable to fixed-term workers as defined in law, collective agreements or practice in each Member State.

Thus, if the persons with daily fixed-term contracts are considered to be workers in Greece, the Directive is applicable. If instead they are considered to be providers of services, they are not covered by the Directive.

According to Clause 5 of the Directive, the Member States must introduce measures to prevent abuse arising from the use of successive fixed-term contracts, either by requiring objective reasons for renewing the contracts, providing for a maximum duration or providing for a maximum number of renewals. The measures introduced must be sufficient to prevent abuse. If there are fixed-term workers with contracts which are renewed daily during several years, this does not seem to be compatible with Clause 5 of the Directive.

The Commission is currently in active contact with the Greek authorities to ensure the correct transposition of the Directive.

---

(1)  OJ L 175, 10.7.1999, p. 43.

1

(2)  OJ L 39, 14.2.1976, p. 40.

2

(3)  OJ L 359, 19.12.1986, p. 56.

3

(4)  OJ L 348, 28.11.1992, p. 1.

4

---
USCIB: 30/ZJ 

A1"'PEND£D JC\..U,.,ENl'S vi.Ji'c 

T f,JJ GQJdJM·fg,as £ } 'l'ERW 

24 March 1953 

MJ!MQ.RANDUM FOR THE l@tBER$ OF USCI~: 

PL86-36/5o use; 3605 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

Subject: A~tation ot[""" __________ __, Under ASA Paoitico 

l. The encloeed report b&a been prepared by the 

Assistant Chiet ot Sta.tr. a=2. Department ot the Arrrq, 

pursuant to USCIB decision at the Eighty-second Dlfft1ngo 

2o Thie report ia forwarded for study with a view 

to consid.eratiOn at the next meeting ot the Boardo 

Acting Executive ~ Secretary. USCIB 

Encloeure 

Memo from AoCo ot S., 0=2 

dated 23 Mar 53 with report; 

on above eubjecto 

USCIB: 30/23 lk:PP:liiN:&EB BOSl:Rffift'f8 CCSJ 

T,1 ~i GQPt'llORB 111.!ff:RIAL 

TOP SECRET 

31 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 01-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
Tbl3 d!n ~e r~~n~e !!nel >ffict~lv indoctrinated m ' ~an~ ~tb com mumcat10n mtelltgPnce securit)' rf'gulat1 )08 and au th lr'i:r.ed to n>CPlYC. the mfonnat n reported herem 

DEPAR'!MmT OF THE ARMY 

OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT CHIEF OF STAFF, G=2, INTELLIGENCE 

WASHINGTON 25, Do C. 

23 Mar 1953 

G2=ASA 

MEMORANDUM FOR: ACTING EXECUTIVE SECRETARY~ USCIB 

SUBJECT: USCIB 30/17 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

lo In accordance with the USCIB decision on subject item 

made at the meeting or the Board on lJ February 1953, the matter 

or increaeing the etrort orl I preeeintl.¥ controlled 

by ASA Pacif'ic, bas been investig&tea and a report ·· .. prepared thereono 

2o It 1e HqUeeted that the incloaed report on eubject aug"" 

mantation be forwarded to members of USCIB for their consideration 

prior to d.iscusl!lion or the matter at the next meeting of the Boardo 

.30 It will be noted that consideration ot the probl«a also 

involved the question of providing assistance to thej Ito 

enable it to increase ite effort in the low level voice Intercept 

field. 

4o The purpose ot this report is to obtain approval, in 

principle, of the proposed concept prior to forwarding the concept 

to CnlCFE for corleideration of planning detaile and problems in= 

herent in implementation of' the proposed concept or operationo 

1 Incl: 

Report to the Members 

ot USCIB 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY Form 7B1-<:10SC 

1 J"I ' 

(Signed) 

Ro Co PARTRIDGE 

Major General, GS 

Ao Co Of So. 0=2 

TOP SECRET €1'\NOE
...... _,_ ........ .,. 

• ~~ .. ~ ·-""""" e '"' A STANDARD FORM NO. 81 • 

Office Memo~ "~,,-~,A~ 

TO OOB DATE: 3 January 19 52 

---- - FROM AFSA-34 

SUBJECT: SCAG action on Tom_pkins proposa~. 

l. At its meeting on S_December 1951 SCAG discussed the proposal of Dr. Tompkins 

that basic research be done by RAND Corporation for .A.FSA. There was extended discussion of BP.rtwell type programs and their applicability to the 

problems under consideration. There was considerable speculation about 

possible contractors. 

2. 

.·• 

It WRB agreed that: 

There is a need for basic rese~rch. 

AFSA is to prepare a list of problems which could be made a subject 

of research by a contractor. -

AFSA is to prepare a list of potential contractors. 

The chairman of SCAG \1111 prepare a letter to DIRAFSA on this subj.act. 

--~:a._ P, tfully, • 

-·. • .. ~ l!i tr · . Chief, SA-34 

..;: 

eclassifi ed and a roved for release b NSA on 04-15-2014 ursuantto E .0. 1352 

_, .. 

-~_ ... 

,, 

-·.
- .. REF ID:A59075 

6969'.IH SUPPORT SQUADRON 

Bolling lir Force Base 

Washington 25, D. o. 

SUBJ1IDT: Instructions for ?.reparation of Recommendation Letters 

TOa Rating Officers Concerned 

l. The following ~nformation is submitted to assist you in the preparation of the letters of recommendation' 

a. Self explanatory. 

b. Strike out ap~ropriate word or werds. 

c. Self explanatory. 

d. Self' explanatory. 

e. In t..~e event off leer is not filling an authorized vacancy, it 

will be sho'im by inserting the iVOrd »none n in blank spaces. 

:r.. If off'icer has performed no otJ.-ier princ:lpl11 duties during this 

pm··iod use the word 11none .. u 

g~ Evaluation: This should be a clecr, consise word description, 

citing specific achieveme~ts of the officer. Non Cl)Illillitt~l recomm.endction 

wLll not be accepted. 

If the officer is not recommended this space ~rill utilized to 

state reasons why .. 

h. Strike out appropriate woni or words. 

i. Rema.rksa May include notenorthy additional :iuties, special 

details or projects to whjoh of'ficer is assigned, letters of connnendation 

received since last promotion. 

2. Recommendations will be indorsed by the supervisor cf the officer 

preparing the letter of ev~luation. 

3. LJformation contained in the letter of ev~luation and/or indorsement 

will not be classified higher than restricted.. 

- @'pp roved for Release by NSA on 07-24-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
.. > 

REF ID :A59075. 

6969th Spt Sq, no £ile no., Subj: Jhstru~tj~nd for Preparation of Recommendation Letters 

4. Jh the event the allocated sp~ce is insufficient for your remarks, 

evaluation, etc, continue on en oxbra sheet of paper mak:ing reference to the 

appropraite item. 

FOR THE COlair.ANDERt 

.... .... - ,._;_:... ;.,..,., / 

' ,. / .... I' :. .... ~.'~, •"' //• 

FRA:NC IS C. AXTELL 

Captai...~, USAF 

Personnel O.f'ficer 

2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marvin Robinson, Jr., Appellant.

[773 NYS2d 723]

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Charles T. Maloy, J.), rendered April 24, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed *(see People v Holmes,*306 AD2d 889 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 621 [2003]). Present—Pine, J.P., Wisner, Kehoe, Gorski and Hayes, JJ.
LUST Program - Utah **1991 1996**  **2001 2006**  **2011**

Active tanks 12882 5186 4188 4065 3861 Closed tanks 4521 9755 12088 12739 13321 Cleanups initiated 464 2380 3510 4200 4527 cleanups completed 143 1941 3170 3796 4195 **New cleanups/5 yrs 1916**  **1130 690**  **327**

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000

1990 1995 20002005 2010 2015 Active tanks Closed tanks Cleanups initiated cleanups completed

Source: US EPA UST Performance Measures http://www.epa.gov/oust/cat/camarchv.htm

1/13/2012 01990 1995 20002005 2010 2015
____ REF __ .ID : A6 6 7 4 O_. 

CIVILnN ElJPLOYMENT BOA:Rll · 

Present: 

Colonel Kullback 

Lt. Colonel Clerk 

Lt. Colonel "''alker 

Lt. Colonel Frier 

Captain Kenney 

Mr. Rowlett 

Mr. Rhoads 

Mr. Starlin 

WillU!m A. Fletch~t 

- - -------~ ~ 

Minutes of Meeting Held 

20 !fiay 194E:, noom 117 

Ht'e deus rtE•rs 

-.. __ 

/ . /" 

,> 

' .. 

\ 

The cese of flr. Tfillistr. ~. Flt!tcher es presented for review by the 

Beare. The original chorgGs of in~fficiency as submittPd by operating 

officials, with supplementrry evicence, were distrihlted to Bo£rd mewbere. 

The official steter~nt or the chargPs es presented to Mr. Fletcher "f'DS 

reviewed as '<SS the anewer to the,e cherges. After ljmited discussion 

of thP csse, it wss sug~PstPd that s co~plPte fSle of all papers encl evi~ 

dence be compiled and,Siucied in tvrn by c-ech Board ir.ernber. This is to 

be done b~fore thF next Board meeting on 24 Mey 1946. At thet time Mr. 

Fletcher will be called 1n to state his csse orally and the Co!'!'r.iittee rlll 

arrive at e decision on the basis or co~plcte evidence submitted. 

Agenda 

An agenda or the Boerc1 meeting to be h~ld ~4 May 1946 was oiEtributea 

to all mer..be-rs. Attached theretc was a rough dreft of sug~E·sted standard 

operating procf~durce for the Board., This 'ill be further chcussed at the 

next meetingu 

~~LENN S A Ill 

Chairman, Civilian E~ploytP~nt 

Boe rd 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 04-18-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

~ .. \ 

-'·' " .
Docket No: FAA-2015-4202 Dir ID: 2014-NM-016-AD

. Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 1/23/14

Regional Airline Association 1/23/14

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 1/23/14

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 1/23/14
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                              1,000
       
<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                         2,761
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 66,847
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   8,153
<INVENTORY>                                                   22,258
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             102,966
<PP&E>                                                       105,187
<DEPRECIATION>                                               172,009
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               351,078
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         35,260
<BONDS>                                                      518,279
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        120,147
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  (338,614)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 351,078
<SALES>                                                       16,077
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             108,523
<CGS>                                                         12,392
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 88,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                (392)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            26,812
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (6,321)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  (2,158)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (4,163)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (4,163)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 (12.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (12.34)
        

</TABLE>
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-19-00004-CV 

No. 07-19-00144-CV 

PRIDE NETWORK, INC., D/B/A NTS COMMUNICATIONS, AND 

NTS COMMUNICATIONS, INC., APPELLANTS 

 

V. 

 

ACRS 2000 CORP., APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 237th District Court 

Lubbock County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2016-520,098, Honorable Les Hatch, Presiding 

 

April 23, 2019 

 

ORDER OF SEVERANCE AND DISMISSAL 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Appellants, Pride Network, Inc. d/b/a NTS Communications and NTS 

Communications, Inc., appeal from the Final Judgment of the trial court. Appellee, ACRS 

2000 Corp., has filed a cross-appeal. Now pending before this court is appellants’ motion 

to voluntarily dismiss their appeal. Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant 

appellants’ motion pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1).
2

Accordingly, we sever appellants’ appeal into cause number 07-19-00144-CV and 

dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellants’ request, no motion for 

rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

The cross-appeal of ACRS 2000 Corp. shall continue to disposition under 

appellate cause number 07-19-00004-CV. We note that cross-appellant’s brief was due 

April 5, 2019, but was not filed. If cross-appellant’s brief is not filed with the clerk of this 

court by 5:00 p.m., May 3, 2019, the cross-appeal will be dismissed for want of 

prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). No further extensions will be granted.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam
<PAGE>



                                                                      EXHIBIT 99
                                                                      ----------

            WINTHROP RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATES I, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
            --------------------------------------------------------
                           FORM 10-QSB MARCH 31, 2002
                           --------------------------


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION REQUIRED PURSUANT TO SECTION 9.4 OF THE PARTNERSHIP
AGREEMENT

1.   Statement of Cash Available for Distribution for the three months ended
     March 31, 2002:

     Net Loss                                                  $    (15,000)
     Add:   Equity in loss of Local Limited Partnership              21,000
            Cash to reserves                                         (6,000)
                                                               ------------
      Cash Available for Distribution                          $      -
                                                               ============


2.   Fees and other compensation paid or accrued by the Partnership to the
     General Partners, or their affiliates, during the three months ended March
     31, 2002:

      Entity Receiving                Form of
        Compensation                Compensation                 Amount
    -----------------------      -------------------       -----------------

            None









                                    12 of 12
Docket No: FAA

- 2015

- 4202 Dir ID: 2014

- NM

- 016

- AD

. Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 1/23/14

Regional Airline Association 1/23/14

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 1/23/14

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 1/2 3/14
i
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation of our report dated December 17, 1998 except as
to the information in Note R, for which the date is January 4, 1999 on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule
of SatCon Technology Corporation and its subsidiaries as of September 30, 1998
and 1997, and for each of the three years in the period ended September 30,
1998, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, into the
Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-
75934, 33-4280 and 333-08047) and Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-05939 and 333-37921).


                                  /s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                  -------------------------------
                                  PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


Boston, Massachusetts

January 13, 1999
·-- ·- --· 

(" 

'f6F BECRE'f {:)'. 6 • E'i'EO OPHi¥ ~L 86-36/50 USC 3605 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 16 April 1954 

SUBJECT: Visit of I ... _____ _. 13 April 1954, in regard to Circuit MERCURY 

I 

Mr .II explained to me that he was acting in the absence of Brigadier . 

Tiltmen ~d gone to Canada to make farewells up there. 

He had gone to Captain Taylor to try to get amplification of the simple, 

categorical negative that Captain Taylor had cornmunicated·to him as a result 

of last Friday's meeting of USCIB in regard to the Circuit MERCURY matter. 

He had a good talk with Captain Taylor, but d o et some technical 

reasons if he could behind the decision. 

I took occasion to go slowly and carefully into the technicalreasons for 

the USCIB decision. I told him that that· decision was not reached in a helterskelter fashion, after just a few minutes deliberation, but only after considerable:·1length of time and full discussion. '. Eo 3.31hl 121 

l •'PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

I explained that in the.course of the USCIB discussio_n I had answered 

some technical questions that arose and said that the Board, after listening 

carefully, had decided it was the better part of wisdom t. o alo with the 

original thought that General Ganin~ had, of 

TOP S'ECRET U.S~ EYES ONLY 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-09-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
EO 3. 3 I h I I 2 I 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

REF ID:A4045942 
SEGRl:I 

!Of .JJ.8, EYEitJ8\~ _..F ID: 942 

I 

That is the way we left it. He was quite content. He feels he.got 

a very fair and good picture of our reasons; sound, honest, nothing more 

than·a real desire on our part not to do anything that·would be .a: hindrance 

to the US/UIC COMINT business at the highest level, ..._ ______ ...,... ______________ 

Capt. Agnew: Did you tell him these were your informa.i views arid t~t ~C~ had rejected.the request of Capt. Taylor that the USC~~~eri\,~tRn be accompa:nied 

by reasons given therefor? PL S6c36/so use 3Gos 

Mr. Friedman: Yes. But I told him that Mr. Dulles had al.ready signed a 

memorandum to the Director General of ISIB informaliy explairiing something 

about this negative decision. I told him that the ersonal iilrorma.l 

remarks rather than a formal declaration. 

Mr. Patton: Did· he make a ma,jor point of the I I 

iOP e~eREI Page 3 

) 
It was agreed ·to. advise him b~ telegram of the visit. 

3. 3 !hi I 2 I 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

' .. ·t 

TOP SECRET Page 4
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 39 (Friday, February 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 10744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04224]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


In the Matter of Defense Industries International, Inc., EvCarCo, 
Inc., and Island Breeze International, Inc., Order of Suspension of 
Trading

February 25, 2015.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Defense Industries International, Inc. because it has not filed any 
periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2011.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
EvCarCo, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the 
period ended September 30, 2012.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Island Breeze International, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic 
reports since the period ended September 30, 2012.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed companies. Therefore, it is ordered, 
pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that 
trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended 
for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST on February 25, 2015, through 11:59 
p.m. EDT on March 10, 2015.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-04224 Filed 2-25-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P