alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 997/2006

of 30 June 2006         

fixing the rates of refunds applicable to certain products from the sugar sector exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the market in the sugar sector (1), and in particular Article 33(2)(a) and (4) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The rates of the refunds applicable to the basic products listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1043/2005 and in Article 1(1) and in point (1) of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 318/2006, and exported in the form of goods listed in Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 318/2006, shall be fixed as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 June 2006.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN            

Vice-President

----

(1)OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 172, 5.7.2005, p. 24. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 544/2006 (OJ L 94, 1.4.2006, p. 24).

----

ANNEX

Rates of refunds applicable from 1 July 2006 to certain products from the sugar sector exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty (1)

----

(1)  The rates set out in this Annex are not applicable to exports to Bulgaria, with effect from 1 October 2004, to Romania with effect from 1 December 2005, and to the goods listed in Tables I and II to Protocol No 2 to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 exported to the Swiss Confederation or to the Principality of Liechtenstein with effect from 1 February 2005.

----
/' 

USCIB: 32./3 

Ml!MORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB 

10 March 1954 

EQ 3.3(h) (2) 

PL~6-36/50 USC 3605 

Subject SHAPE nyn Planning - I .... _________ __. 

The enclosed exchange of cables between the ACofS, Intelligence, 

SHAPE and the Director, NSA, is forwarded for information at the request 

of the Director, NSA. 

Enclosures 

1. ACofS (I) SHAPE mag #512. 

2. DIR, NSA, reply, DTG 012222Z Mar 54. 

USCIB 32./3 

'FOP SECRET 

eclassified and a roved or release b NS on 01-28-2014 ursuantt E.O. 1352 

31 
,. '0 P:Fs1~~~k't9 fEO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

c 

• 0 

p 

Reference 512 y 25 February 195~ 

TOP ~M'f DIRECTOR NSA AND DIRECTOR/gcH9.•FRCMACOFS INTELLIGENCE SHAPE. 

l. You will have been informed through SHAPE •.y' channels (Reference 

ID 9139/6 end 7) that approaches /~ve been me.de toli.;.... _________ __, 

Anticipate that detailed discussions with their app:roprlate ne.tione.l. 

authorities will start in about .a week and. tha.t negotiations should be well 

advanced by end March. 

2. Propose therefore•, if' negotiations a.re proving \satisfactory, to 

make an approach at end -ot March or in eELI"ly April to tbeLI Chiefs of' 

Staff'. 

3. Early participation of' [I] in SHAPE 'Y' is necessary 'for 

following ree.eons: 

a. 

who has had extensive experience. of 'Y' 1n war t:lme. L..--------' 

b. I fare making considerable• •• contribution of force~ of all 

3 services and /e.re therefore important element• 1,.i.;... -------------' 

Camnands. 

c. 'Y' planning in thel I affecting the above 

I 

mentioned ct:mnends will pose problems new to SHAPE of Naval 'Y' and cooperation /between Uaval and Air 'Y' which should be tackled vi thout delay • 

.__ __ ___.ty• contribution will be closely involved in these problems, which 

cannot be solved without I !participation in 'Y' planning. 

4. Request your concurrence with proposal contained in Paragraph 2 

above. 

'l'eP SEeftE'f CONTROL NUMBER 54-573A COPY~_}_ OF 46 COPIFS 

PAGE--r-oF 1 PAGF.S 

TOP SECRET 
DTG Ol.2222'Z MAR 54 

FRCM• DIRECTOR, NBA l MARCH 1954 

TO· Acors, G-2, DA 

THE PENTAGON 

ATm t LT. COL. BELLOOBY 

c 

0 

p 

y 

PI.BE PASS TO SCHCM CI.B REUR 512 PD US OFFEPS NO OBJECTIOO TO APPROACH TO 

____ I PRM:DED DIBCl5SI~ ~ITRI jARE m FINAL STAGES 

AND NO SIGNlFICA?fr DIFFICULTIES HAVE BEEN ENCOUNTERED 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

'f'OP SEORHF CONTROL NUMBER 54- 573B 

COPY .3 I OF 46 COPIES 

PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGE.S 

TOP SECRET
----

(2004/C 78 E/0654)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3646/03

by Salvador Jové Peres (GUE/NGL) and Pedro Marset Campos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(9 December 2003)

Subject:   European Union/Morocco agreement

The Council of Ministers for Agriculture, meeting in March and December 1997, stressed ‘the importance of taking account, when defining the Community position in negotiations with third countries, of the characteristics of the Community agricultural market and of the socio-economic repercussions of the proposed concessions on that market, as well as of the need to develop a consistent overall strategy on the subject’, and they encouraged ‘the Commission to conduct regular analyses of the situation regarding trade in agricultural products and in particular of the impact of preferential arrangements for imports of such products into the Community. They stressed'the need to have available, before the adoption of negotiating directives or autonomous measures involving concessions on agricultural products, an analysis of the impact of the concessions liable to be granted to third countries or groups of third countries as well as of the advantages which could result for the European Union’.

Has the Commission carried out the impact studies called for by the Council in order to define the Community position in negotiations with Morocco? Will it forward them to Parliament? What is the scheduled timetable for submitting the regular impact studies on the association agreement with Morocco called for by the Council?

Joint answer

to Written Questions E-3645/03 and E-3646/03

given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(30 January 2004)

Within the recent agreement with Morocco on the import of agricultural products, quotas have been determined on the basis of traditional patterns on flows. Morocco has exceeded the quota fixed in the Association Agreement for the export of courgettes. However, this has caused no disturbances in the Community market, nor has any operator or country presented complaints. Moreover, the relevant data has been regularly supplied to the Management Committee of Fruit and Vegetables. Therefore, the Commission did not deem it necessary to take action as there is no case for fraud or other misgivings, the excess import quotas being the result of an increased demand for courgettes in the Community.

An impact study was conducted in 1997. In 2002, the Council formally asked the Commission to produce another study on the impact of the liberalisation of the Mediterranean agricultural products on the bilateral negotiations on agriculture. A reference to this study has been included in the conclusions of the meeting of Euro-Mediterranean Ministers of Foreign Affairs which took place in Naples on 2/3 December 2003. This study has been finalised recently and is available on (www.femise.org).

The Commission is perfectly aware of the particular sensitivities linked to the Mediterranean products. For this reason, it informs the players involved at regular intervals, in the context of the various Management and Consultative committees and through the different Council working groups.

----
National Reconnaissance Office Release

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release # 01-20

Contact: (703) 808-5050 January 15, 2020

NRO Honors Two New Pioneers of National Reconnaissance

In a ceremony January 15, 2020 before the NRO workforce and guests, Director of the 

National Reconnaissance Office (DNRO) Dr. Christopher Scolese honored Edward C. 

Mahen, Jr. and the late Carol A. Staubach as Pioneers of National Reconnaissance. 

Recognized as the highest honor in the field, Pioneers are individuals who have made

contributions to national reconnaissance that changed the direction and scope of the 

discipline and its practice. Ms. Staubach and Mr. Mahen join a cadre of 93 other NRO 

Pioneers.

“This award recognizes and pays tribute to legendary American patriots representing the 

very best in their field. They were and are truly brilliant people; the experts of their day. 

And they are national heroes,” said DNRO Scolese, calling the Pioneer Award the “Hall 

of Fame for NRO.”

Carol Staubach was inducted posthumously into the Pioneer Hall for pioneering the 

future of overhead reconnaissance by modernizing the NRO’s SIGINT ground 

architecture, delivering unprecedented intelligence capabilities and the blueprint for the 

future NRO enterprise. She overcame social, fiscal, international, and technical 

challenges to positively impact the course of the NRO. 

“Carol enabled our systems to achieve even greater tactical and strategic relevance for 

the nation,” said Dr. Scolese. Ms. Staubach’s family accepted the honor on her behalf. 

Ed Mahen was honored for pioneering the development of a revolutionary new 

reconnaissance satellite and supporting infrastructure that significantly enhanced and 

strengthened national security over the past decade. 

“Mr. Mahen’s work enabled intelligence analysts to understand adversary capabilities 

and intent and helped our warfighters locate and track adversaries,” said Scolese. 

“We have such great respect for the lasting and critical contributions of our Pioneers of 

National Reconnaissance,” said Scolese. “Their remarkable achievements illustrate the 

fearless spirit of innovation that has defined the NRO since our beginning. Their 

exceptional service and pioneering work contributed to strengthening the nation’s 

security and positioning the NRO as a leader in space reconnaissance.”

-NROThe NRO is the Intelligence Community element and Department of Defense agency 

responsible for developing, acquiring, launching, and operating America’s intelligence 

satellites to meet the national security needs of our nation.
The
Board of Directors and Stockholders Revlon, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
on Form S-8 of Revlon, Inc. of our report dated February 12, 2004, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Revlon, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related
statements of operations, stockholders' deficiency and
comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2003 and the related financial
statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2003
annual report of Form 10-K of Revlon, Inc. Our report references to the
adoption of the provision of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets" as of January 1, 2002.

/s/
KPMG LLPNew York, New YorkFebruary 19,
2004

---
. 

'·· ' • REF ID:A67212 

12 September 1950 

SUBJr.CT: Iten for tiacuaaion in Conference 

1. !• Par. 4j ot JCS 2f114/5, dated 9 4\Uf' 1950, reads as tollows: 

"..l.· Comparable Br.i.t.ish and U.S. cipher machines, whenever practicable, ahoult• uae phya1cally interchangeable 

rotora. 11 

b. .Par. 6 of the oer:.orandum sent to the Hri tish aa a result ot 

the decision in JC.Ci 2CY/4/5 reads as follows: 

"6. 'Dae u.s. Chieta ot Start turther propose that, eo 

far as practicable, comparable British and U.S. ciphal" 

machines use physically interchangeable rot.ore. The 7-rotor 

rn;::.: rotors are ot the same size a.a those in the CCU 

(CSP 1700). Such standardization would permit emer£41ncy 

issue of rotor• by either country- to the other, if necessary." 

2. It is deeirable that the foree;oinr proposal be explored b7 the 

contereea ot .&'ubcommitteea A and E, and or any working graupa thereot 

in which dlscussion ot this .matter is pertinent. 

3. r.ecolJl!lendationa arisinr from such diacusaiona will be included 

in final reports of working groups end subcomittees. 

''1< ,>;• ;:-r•;:::o,. _....,,L - l''• • r 1r- "'~ i I 1 Ji :t.~-. ,s 

llilllam , • Friedman 

Chairman, F..xecutive Coi..'lllittee 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-13-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Francois R. Martelet,
Chief Executive Officer of AVAX Technologies, Inc. (the Company), hereby
certify pursuant to Section 1350, of chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code, and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge, (1) the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company to which this
Exhibit is attached (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                           | 
|-------------------------- | 
|/s/
 Francois R. Martelet 
|                           | 
|Francois R. Martelet, M.D.

Dated:   April
15, 2008

I, Richard P. Rainey,
Principal Financial Officer of AVAX Technologies, Inc. (the Company), hereby
certify pursuant to Section 1350, of chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code, and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge, (1) the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company to which this
Exhibit is attached (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                      | 
|--------------------- | 
|/s/ Richard P. Rainey
|                      | 
|Richard P. Rainey     | 

Dated:   April
15, 2008

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1460 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1460

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the Yellow Ribbon G.I. 
Education Enhancement Program to cover recipients of the Marine Gunnery 
      Sergeant John David Fry scholarship, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2015

 Mr. Brown (for himself and Mr. Tillis) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the Yellow Ribbon G.I. 
Education Enhancement Program to cover recipients of the Marine Gunnery 
      Sergeant John David Fry scholarship, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fry Scholarship Enhancement Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF YELLOW RIBBON G.I. EDUCATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 3317(a) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended by striking ``in paragraphs (1) and (2)'' and inserting ``in 
paragraphs (1), (2), and (9)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to academic years beginning after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

###### Tennessee Valley Authority

          - [Docket No. 50-391-OL; ASLBP No. 15-938-01-0L-BD01]

                    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission,                     *see*37 FR 28,710 (Dec. 29, 1972), and the Commission's regulations,                     *see e.g.,*10 CFR 2.104, 2.105, 2.300, 2.309, 2.313, 2.318, 2.321, notice is hereby given that an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (Board) is being established to preside over the following proceeding:                

## Tennessee Valley Authority (Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2)

This proceeding concerns motions, dated February 5, 2015 and filed February 6, 2015, by Southern Alliance for Clean Energy to (1) reopen the record; and (2) admit a new contention in the captioned matter regarding the updated application by Tennessee Valley Authority for a facility operating license for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2, to be located in Rhea County, Tennessee.

The Board is comprised of the following administrative judges:

Paul S. Ryerson, Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

Dr. Gary S. Arnold, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

Dr. Richard E. Wardwell, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

                    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule.                     *See*10 CFR. 2.302.                

Rockville, Maryland.

Dated: February 23, 2015.

E. Roy Hawkens,

Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.

[FR Doc. 2015-04130 Filed 2-26-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
S7 1 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 1 q c’ 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 941 05-3901 

## JAN 182013
Mr. Eric Massey Air Division Arizona Department ofEnvironmental Quality 1110 W. Washington Street Phoenix, Arizona 85007 

## ØI DearM1VjYIsey: I am vriting to transmitthe findings from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) 2012 Technical System Audit (TSA) ofthe ArizonaDepartment ofEnvironmental Quality (ADEQ) ambient air monitoring program. This audit was performed in accordance with 40 CFR Part 58, Section 2.5, which requires that EPA conduct TSAs ofprimary quality assurance organizations every three years. EPA reviewed ADEQ’s ambient air monitoringprogram, including networkmanagement, field operations, laboratory operations, quality assurance, and data managementprocedures. Generally, we found that ADEQ’s air monitoring program is robust and meets EPA requirements. As with any audit, this TSA uncovered some program areas within the agency that can be improved. Your agency has been very responsive to the audit findings and has already begun working on corrective actions. The formal corrective action response is due to EPA within 60 days ofreceipt ofthe final TSAreport. I wantto thankyou and your staffforyour full cooperation and participation during the audit. The results ofthis audit significantly contribute to EPA’s overall understanding ofambient monitoring in Arizona. Please contact me ifyou have questions, or your staffmay contact Michael Flagg at (415) 972-3372 or Matthew Lakin at (415) 972-3851. Sincerely,

Jordan Director, Air Division Enclosure
cc: TheresaRigney, ADEQ

Printed on Recycled Paper
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: May 9, 2006

/s/ Stephen C. JumperStephen C. JumperPresident and Chief Executive Officer
# CE2004084EN.01042102.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/421 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/421

---

(2004/C 84 E/0492)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0524/04

by Eluned Morgan (PSE) to the Commission

(17 February 2004)

Subject:   The Constitution

Subject:

Can the Commission confirm that, if a Member State were to divide as a result of a region democratically gaining independence, that the precedent set by Algeria would apply?

Can the Commission explain what exactly happened in the Algeria case?

Could the Commission confirm whether a newly independent region would have to leave the EU and then apply for accession afresh?

Would an application of this type require a renegotiation of the treaties at an IGC and the unanimous agreement of the 25 Member States?

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(1 March 2004)

(1 March 2004)

The European Communities and the European Union have been established by the relevant treaties among the Member States. The treaties apply to the Member States (Article 299 of the EC Treaty). When a part of the territory of a Member State ceases to be a part of that state, e.g. because that territory becomes an independent state, the treaties will no longer apply to that territory. In other words, a newly independent region would, by the fact of its independence, become a third country with respect to the Union and the treaties would, from the day of its independence, not apply anymore on its territory.

Under Article 49 of the Treaty on European Union, any European State which respects the principles set out in Article 6(1) of the Treaty on European Union may apply to become a member of the Union. An application of this type requires, if the application is accepted by the Council acting unanimously, a negotiation on an agreement between the Applicant State and the Member States on the conditions of admission and the adjustments to the treaties which such admission entails. This agreement is subject to ratification by all Member States and the Applicant State.

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2
                                                                   ------------


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                      ----------------------------------

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration 
Statement on Form S-8 in connection with the 1992 Stock Incentive Plan of our 
report dated January 26, 1999, relating to the financial statements, which 
appears in the 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders of Banyan Systems 
Incorporated, which is incorporated by reference in Banyan Systems 
Incorporated's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998. 
We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January 
26, 1999, relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in such 
Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                    /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                    -------------------------------------

                                    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
May 14, 1999