alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 246 (Thursday, December 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 80886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32245]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Third Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 224: Airport Security 
Access Control Systems

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 224 meeting: Airport Security 
Access Control Systems (Update to DO-230B).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 224: Airport Security Access Control 
Systems.

DATES: The meeting will be held January 13, 2011, from 10 a.m. to 5 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, MacIntosh--NBAA Room and Hilton--ATA Room, Washington, DC 
20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 224: Airport Security Access 
Control Systems (Update to DO-230B):

Agenda

January 13, 2011

     Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks.
     Review/Approve Summary--Second Meeting.
     Report on Security Construction Guidelines Process.
     Workgroup Reports.
     Credentialing.
     PACS.
     Biometrics.
     Communications.
     Video.
     Other Input from Members.
     Work Objectives for Next Plenary.
     Other Business.
     Establish Agenda for Next Meeting.
     Date and Place of Next Meeting.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 16, 2010.
Robert L. Bostiga,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010-32245 Filed 12-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
Dear General Churchill; 

REF ID:A99648 

GEORGE F"ASVAN 

CHICAGO 

Sept. 6 ,1913 • 

I carefully note letter of Septer.iber 2nd,over ycur 

signature. ~ere is no more guessing in Cryptogr~p~ than there is in ~lgebr&.. uGuessi:cg" ,is undii;nified -"asRUI!iI>tion" ,sounds lots better. 

I don't question the sincerity of any of the ~ener&.l 

Officers but some 0£ the subordinate& have made us dance without givine us 

a oho.nee to select the tune, but I su~pose we will forget it sone day. 

If .aiv~rb~nk had ir..vented s. cipher and I h&d put 'I!lYself on record that it waR ir.decifherable and had been swarded the D.~.:n. 

and ha.d t:r.e cit>her printer esvecially mentioned in the citation and r:ry 

boss had been r.ade the L.night of St. George and St. ~ichael on account of 

the r:a.chine :prir..tine! across the ocean , I doubt if I wow.d be very enthusi~stic about anybody ~rovin~ that"~ doll was stuffed with sawdust 4

and I 

think I ve~· likely would. put as m&.r.y obstacles in their v.ray. I enclose 

copy of a r.iessage sent us by 1.&.uborene sometime a.go,which we never tried 

to work on because it was not lone enough and yet, when he was here, he 

said we had no ri~ht to Jump at any conclusions as to the nU''ber of c:1cles 

or the lenbth of the message. Ee knew,at the ti~e, we wanted three complete 

revolutions o:r the tape and left us to infer that this message covered that 

and confirmed it when he was here. 

I v;if.:.h, if' possible, someone ir.. the n.I.D. could ascertain in re~~rd to this and see if the message is not less than one cycle 

and for that reason. i~possible to decipher. 

I don't understand~ nauborgne ~send us the 

messages. The machine has been set UI> for over three weeks and yet, he cannot send us two hours work but asks for one delay after another, 'Which Riverbank construes as tryinc; to get another schen.e to work out. 

!I!o Gener&! I:. Churchill , Woodward.Lpartment, 

2301 Conneoticut Ave., 

Washington. D. c. 

8incerely yours, 

~ 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 08-05-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

.. 

-
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Unified Grocers, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended July 3,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard J. Martin, Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
for the periods presented in the Report.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 17, 2010



/s/    RICHARD J. MARTINRichard J. MartinExecutive Vice President, Finance and
Administration and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Racine Rubber Company, Appellant, vs. Industrial Commission of Wisconsin and another, Respondents.

*April 27*

May *15, 1917.*

*Workmen's compensation: Injury to employee eating lunch: Service incidental to employment.*

An employee who, while eating his lunch in the factory of the employer in accordance with a custom tacitly consented to by the latter, was injured by a pile of crude rubber falling upon him, was at the time “performing service growing out of and incidental to his employment,” within the meaning of sub. (2), sec. 2394 — 3, Stats.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane county: E. Ray Stevers, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Robert R. Freeman,*attorney, and *Henry J. Bendinger,*of counsel, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Bendinger.*

For the respondent *Industrial Commission*there was a brief by the *Attorney General*and *J. E. Messerschmidt,*assistant attorney general, and oral argument by *Mr. Messerschmidt.*

Winslow, C. J.

An employee of a manufacturing concern was seated on a large piece of rubber in a room in the factory at the noon hour eating his lunch, in accordance with a long existing custom known by and tacitly consented to by his employer, when a large pile of crude rubber near him unexpectedly fell on him, breaking his leg. The question presented in this case is whether he was at the time of the accident performing service “growing out of and incidental to his employment” within the meaning of sec. 2394 — 3, Stats, (the Workmen’s Compensation Act).

This question must be answered in the affirmative on the authority of *Milwaukee Western F. Co. v. Industrial Comm.*159 Wis. 635, 150 N. W. 998.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed, with costs against appellant in favor of respondent *Macaluso.*
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET

#### In re Report of the Commission on Continuing Legal Education. James Kenneth Clower (# 0020325), Respondent.

1999 TERM

ORDER

This matter originated in this court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “commission”) pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(A)(l)(b) and (A)(2)(d). The commission recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys, including the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal Education, for the 1996-1997 reporting period.

The commission’s report recommended imposition of a sanction against the respondent in the total amount of $750 for noncompliance in the 1996-1997 reporting period. Furthermore, the commission’s report recommended that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law pursuant to Gov.Bar *1497R. X(5)(A)(4), for failure to pay a previous court-ordered sanction for noncompliance in a previous reporting period in addition to noncompliance in the 1996-1997 reporting period. On November 18, 1998, this court issued to the respondent an order to show cause why the commission’s recommendation should not be adopted and an order so entered against the respondent. Respondent filed no objections to the commission’s recommendation and this cause was considered by the court.

It appearing to the court that respondent, James Kenneth Clower, was permanently disbarred from the practice of law on December 2,1998, *Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Cloiver*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 151, 702 N.E.2d 412,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that this matter be, and hereby is, dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Dieter P. Schilling, President and Chief Executive Officer of Delphax Technologies Inc. (the
Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: May 13, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Dieter P. Schilling              
|                    |  |     |  | Dieter P. Schilling                  
|                    |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T H A R J I N D E R K U M A R , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 71392 A ge nc yN o. A 071- 944- 709 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay15, 2012 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , G R A B E R , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. H a r j i nde rK um ar , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of I ndi a , pe t i t i ons pr o s e f orr e vi e w of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order denyi ng hi s m ot i on t o reopen re m ov alproceedi ng s. O ur j uri sdi ct i on i s gov erned b y 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew 

# FI LED MA Y22 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 71392 2 f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on, T

ou f i gh iv. Mukasey , 53 8 F . 3d 98 8, 99 2 (9th C i r. 20 08 ), a n dwe d e n yi n p arta n dd i s m i s s i n p artth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g K u m ar ’s s e c o n dm o tio n to r e ope n a s unt i m e l yw he r e the m ot i on w a s f i l e d ove ray e ara nd aha l f a f t e rthe B I A ’s f in a l d e c is io n , se e 8 C . F . R . § 1003. 2( c ) ( 2) , a nd K um arf a i l e d t o pr e s e nt s u f f ic ie n t e v id e n c e o f

c h an g e dc ir c u m s tan c e s in I n d iato q u a lif yf o ra n e x c e p tio n to th e tim e lim it, se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; s e e al s o T ouf i ghi , 538 F . 3d a t996- 97 (e vi dence m ustdem on strat e pri m a f ac i e e l i gi bi l i ty f

or re l i ef i n o rdert o reopen proceedi ng s bas ed on changed cou ntrycond i t i on s) . T hi s c ou rtl ac ks j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew K um ar ’ s c on t ent i on thathi s f orm er c o u n s e l w a s in e f

f e c tiv e . Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 358 F . 3d 674, 678 ( 9th C i r . 2004) (c ou rtl ac ks j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew cont ent i on s notra i se d b ef ore the agency) . F in a lly , K u m ar ’s r e m a in in g c o n te n tio n s a r e u np e r s u a s iv e . P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: February 9, 2007
    
    /s/ Stephen C. JumperStephen C. JumperPresident and Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)
From: Zachary Pekar/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Antonella Zanobetti" <AZANOBET@hsph.harvard.edu>

Cc: Bryan Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Pradeep Rajan/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Neal 

Fann/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 03/14/2012 01:54 PM

Subject: Request for city-specific effect estimates for potential use in the EPA's ozone NAAQS risk 

assessment

Antonellal,

I had originally sent this e-mail to Dr. Medina-Ramon, but it bounced back, so I am forwarding the original 

e-mail to you in the hopes that you can help with this request for city-specific effect estimates related to 

respiratory hospital admissions - the original e-mail is below (if you have current contact info for Dr. 

Medina-Ramon and would rather have me contact her, just let me know). Thanks!

-----------------------

I am the lead on the ozone risk assessment being completed by EPA as part of our ongoing review of the 

National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone. As part of that risk assessment, we are 

considering modeling morbidity endpoints (including hospital admissions for respiratory effects) 

associated with shorter-term ozone exposure. We have identified your epidemiological study ("The Effect 

of Ozone and PM10 on Hospital Admissions for Pneumonia and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: 

A National Multicity Study" - AJ of Epidemiology, Vol 183, No 5, p. 579) as a potential source for effect 

estimates to use in our risk modeling. We would like to conduct modeling for individual urban study areas 

and therefore, were hoping that you would be able to provide us with the city-specific effect estimates for 

ozone (2-day cumulative lag) from your study. These would be the city-specific effect estimates reflected 

in Figure 1. In addition, if you do provide the city-specific effect estimates, would you clarify the lag 

structure reflected in those estimates (we assume they would reflect a 2 day cumulative lag) and whether 

those effect estimates reflect a two-pollutant model that also accounts for PM10 or a single pollutant 

(ozone only) model. 

If we do use those effect estimates, in order to be transparent with our modeling, we would need to post 

them publically (probably in memo format), so I wanted to also verify that that would be ok.

As you probably would expect, our time table is tight for this risk assessment, so if you can provide us 

with the effect estimates, it would be great to have them in the near term.

Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions.

zach

Zachary Pekar, MSPH, PhD

Human Health Risk Assessment

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

tele: (919) 541-3704

e-mail: pekar.zachary@epa.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,457
<SECURITIES>                                    13,970
<RECEIVABLES>                                      676
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,103
<PP&E>                                           5,194
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,453
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,119
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,312
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,204
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,119
<SALES>                                            430
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,764
<CGS>                                              341
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      341
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,165
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 202
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9,372)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (9,372)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (9,372)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.69)


</TABLE>
1 

REF ID:A67224 

I ! 

AllooaUon ot O:rc4e• 

1. Wertmee t. _.. \o the Uuafer of 

atD8 (9) unpa484 1&r10?Wel \o the h»P'b' Branoh 

an Z2 lonm.be;;; 1944. !A =meet!on with \he ~er ot tblJ Ml'fll£9 .tuact1cma llUl tM 

Mwim •trat.ive atfloe, Arlincton Jlll1 ltiat1on 

te t.ha St.ip?l1' lludl. 

I. tt bu 'be-m de\em1m4 •\ "' tlll ~ ttd• tl'aneter was aade, JIM'eonnel. ozib' 

Wl'\) ba!~sterred &Ud mo'\ wctee. lm•'cb 

u an Miroly 1epa:ra.te t'unat!=l. w -~ 

to the ~ ~ SD acco1"4anoe with tr.; ..,,.t,_ Opara~ Prooet1u:re .. Cr•:n!•tion 

.._;,al tod 5 Cctober 19441 !t :IJI 1"$aotr::.o.a4ed 

that •4i1.oiut vaoanoios be aaa!pe4 w t.1'a 

111.Prlr lr:lnOb to eowr t!m personnel tranlhrred. 

J. I\ bu beGD detOl"lilined iat"o:aa!.l.T 

111.th tbo Ada1niatratiw r;fttc•r 1 ~r1.111gt.on 

iall 8tatiOD t.ba.t U21Wl8\t -.oanoie• a:tst within 

bh allotmE.nt, -thorotore, tl'tu tz=sfer earl be 

Mt.._,ished wltbcNt ~dance. 

@'pproved for Release bv NSA on 64-07-2-014 pursuantto E.O. 1352\3 

' . 

-=
• RE Wf ~~SECttftlTY INI'OHMi\'fION 

USCIB: S/4J7 

S June 1953 

' 

.I 

Subject: 

Canfi:rming :lnto:rmal not.1t1caticm. ~ Bl.&h\7-

aennth Keatillg ot uscia • .bich nOl'U.l.q would bave 

been held cm Fridq. 12 June 1953. bu bee postponed 

until further notice. 

USCIB: 5/4J7 

c:?flJ('~ 

Y ~ L. TAILOll 

Capt,ain, u. s. ••v 

Bacutive Secreta17, USCIB 

24 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-09-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

RESTRIETED 

'i_
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,161,741
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,161,741
<PP&E>                                      15,317,576
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,479,317
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          156,392
<BONDS>                                      1,731,932
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,590,993
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,479,317
<SALES>                                      2,688,845
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,480,889
<CGS>                                        1,008,273
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,008,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,144,604
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,328,012
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,328,012
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,328,012
<EPS-BASIC>                                      52.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    52.11


</TABLE>