alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1570 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1570

 To authorize appropriations to the Secretary of Commerce to establish 
  public-private partnerships under the Market Development Cooperator 
   Program of the International Trade Administration, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 11, 2015

  Mr. Schatz introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize appropriations to the Secretary of Commerce to establish 
  public-private partnerships under the Market Development Cooperator 
   Program of the International Trade Administration, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Export Promotion Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR THE MARKET DEVELOPMENT COOPERATOR 
              PROGRAM OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE.

    (a) In General.--There is authorized to be appropriated to the 
Secretary of Commerce, for the 18-month period beginning on the date of 
the enactment of this Act, $8,000,000 for the Industry and Analysis 
unit of the International Trade Administration--
            (1) to establish public-private partnerships under the 
        Market Development Cooperator Program of the International 
        Trade Administration; and
            (2) to underwrite a portion of the start-up costs for new 
        projects carried out under that Program to strengthen the 
        competitiveness and market share of United States industry, not 
        to exceed, for each such project, the lesser of--
                    (A) \1/2\ of the total start-up costs for the 
                project; or
                    (B) $500,000.
    (b) Requirements.--In obligating and expending the funds 
appropriated pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary of Commerce 
shall give preference to activities that the Secretary determines 
will--
            (1) assist small- and medium-sized businesses in the United 
        States; and
            (2)(A) create or sustain the greatest number of jobs in the 
        United States;
            (B) obtain the maximum return on investment;
            (C) increase United States exports to the Asia and Pacific 
        region;
            (D) increase United States exports in services; or
            (E) address export priorities set by the Department of 
        Commerce.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

================================================================================


                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            Washington, D.C.  20549




                                   FORM 8-K

                                CURRENT REPORT


    Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

    Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):  JULY 15, 1999




                             BANKBOSTON CORPORATION
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)




MASSACHUSETTS                          1-6522              04-2471221
(State or other jurisdiction           (Commission         (IRS Employer
  of incorporation)                    File Number)        Identification No.)


100 FEDERAL STREET, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS                       02110
(Address of principal executive offices)                      (Zip Code)



Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (617) 434-2200



================================================================================
<PAGE>

                                       -2-

ITEM 5.  OTHER EVENTS.
----------------------

    On July 15, 1999, BankBoston Corporation (the Corporation) issued a press
release announcing its earnings for the quarter ended June 30, 1999.  The
financial information that is included herewith as Exhibit 99(a) was included in
the Corporation's press release and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.
-------------------------------------------

(c) Exhibits.

99(a)   Financial information included in the Corporation's Press Release dated
        July 15, 1999.

<PAGE>

                                      -3-

                                   SIGNATURES



    Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



                                           BANKBOSTON CORPORATION



Dated:  July 16, 1999                      /s/ Robert T. Jefferson
                                          -------------------------
                                          Robert T. Jefferson
                                          Comptroller
**EXHIBIT 23.01**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd.            Detroit, Michigan

          We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the 1993 Stock Option Plan and the 1999 Equity Participation Plan) (File No. 333-104429) of our reports dated May 29, 2008 relating to the financial statements of Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. as of March 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the years ended            March 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, and to the internal control over financial reporting at March 31, 2008, which reports are included in Caraco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|               |
|--------------------|
| /s/ Rehmann Robson |
|                    |

Troy, Michigan            June 9, 2008

----
SUBSIDIARIES OF KINDER MORGAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.

Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "A", a Delaware limited partnership.

Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "B", a Delaware limited partnership.

Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "C", a Delaware limited partnership.

Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "D", a Delaware limited partnership.

Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company.

Plantation  Pipe Line Company,  a Delaware  corporation.  Although Kinder Morgan
Energy  Partners,  L.P. owns more that 50% of the  outstanding  capital stock of
Plantation Pipe Line Company,  its financial  results are not consolidated  with
those  of  the  partnership   because  the  partnership  does  not  control  the
corporation.

CGT Trailblazer, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

NGPL Trailblazer, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company.

Trailblazer Pipeline Company, an Illinois general partnership.

Kinder Morgan CO2, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

Heartland Pipeline Company, a Texas general partnership.

SFPP L.P., a Delaware limited partnership.

Kinder Morgan Bulk Terminals Inc., a Louisiana corporation.

River Consulting, Inc., a Louisiana corporation.

Western Plant Services, Inc., a California corporation.
AFS-13-425-E

July 24, 2013

 Exemption No. 6853F

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2000-8153

Mr. William Cavitt

Vice President

American Airlines

P.O. Box 582809

Tulsa, OK 74159

Dear Mr. Cavitt:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 6853, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions 

and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated June 18, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of American Airlines, Inc. (American) for an extension of Exemption No. 6853, as 

amended. That exemption from § 121.317(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows 

American to operate its Boeing 737 and 777 aircraft with “No Smoking” signs that are always 

illuminated.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to American.
2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 6853, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 6853, as amended, to 

August 31, 2015 unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Michael J. Zenkovick

Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards

Service
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30557 Summary Calendar

FANNIE OLIVER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-20-E
- - - - - - - - - - January 31, 1997 Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges: PER CURIAM: * Fannie Oliver appeals from the summary judgment for the defendant in her Social Security action. Oliver contends solely that the Administrative Law Judge failed to determine whether she could obtain and maintain employment on a day-to-day basis. Oliver did not raise her contention before the Appeals Council; she did not exhaust administrative remedies as to the contention.No. 96-30557 - 2 - We find no reason to waive the exhaustion requirement in Oliver’s
case. Consequently, we lack jurisdiction over Oliver’s appeal. Paul v. Shalala , 29 F.3d 208, 210 (5th Cir. 1994). APPEAL DISMISSED.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 0 298 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2011 -NM - 072 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR - M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
# CE2004084EN.01059201.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/592 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/592

---

(2004/C 84 E/0668)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0469/04

by Richard Corbett (PSE) to the Commission

(23 February 2004)

Subject:   Aviation health warnings

Subject:

In view of the growing evidence of health risks involved with flying (deep vein thrombosis, exposure to cosmic radiation, airborne infections etc.), does the Commission agree that safety warnings announced on aircraft prior to take-off should be extended to include an appropriate health warning?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(29 March 2004)

(29 March 2004)

The Commission agrees that air carriers have an important part to play, alongside health authorities, in informing passengers about the possibility of developing deep vein thrombosis. As a precautionary measure, they should warn their passengers of the risk of deep vein thrombosis, of predisposing factors to the illness and of preventive measures to take before flying and on-board the aircraft. The Vice-president of the Commission in charge of Energy and Transport has written to Community carriers urging them to give passengers such information and intends now to write again to see what each airline has done. However, the Commission considers that it is for airlines to decide on the most effective means of getting the message across rather than for public authorities to lay it down.

The Commission is financing research on the strength and nature of the link between air travel and deep vein thrombosis, the results of which will be available in mid-2005. This should considerably advance understanding of the condition and of what should be done to prevent it. It is also supporting research on conditions in aircraft cabins, including air quality, on which possible measures could be based.

---
- - ------------------------· 

REF ID:A72076 

~· 0)0 {J2 0 

,_ )0 ~-.!13 

Dr. C. B. Tompk!aa 

· 

laU.onol 

taa•t"1te 

la:relU 

for Jlwlerioal 

of ~ 

.l.Dal.7el• 

Uni1'llhl'7 of Cal!tonS.a 

406 !UP'I\ A....,. 

Loa Ancel .. 34 .. c.lltonda. 

n.ez. ~% 

At long l&ot rq ~ bW1 GITtTed. Nov 10u can ·~ a n.ood. of 

letten rd which W.a i-. the fun. IJ'.olrevw, t wn't bo able t.o tam4 70u 

the :rocoN.• ehco t b&.YD to 1mep them and QSO thsll t1f'1° U . .mu.. Appal'entl7 

it 1.o eaaler '°'get en~ \baa it ia toge\ NCOrio 1cr one. 

1 All enoloidng a cop-; of the le.tea• Clopo on cltil8J'llQ'.lOea vhich t Just 

reeeiwd t.vmn Semrt\7. ~the cm.17 ~ thnt SeC'A4'l~ did. WD$ 

to clear Dick \1tck lWl. The~ l:lbond Md broughi forih a mcmee. 

}L,1f9YW. th&1' !sol th&t alQ'\lM li1ho cn.n oo cl~~~~ will he ao 

CJJ.~ 117 the \1mri ~ abri4. 

Bold.du the complimU-on9 tn t.be CNet1 of r.&IJdolph Qmnh and 

w. S. Ocmnor \hde ~ to be one m1d. ~a ho mag.. Uofftlmn oonoo~ 

be al.oared tor~ h1d1er ~ ~. I have tolci SwcurU7 ~ f!P 

ahaa4 aM. ~ \o clear hia t&r ~ olnce thia vUl bo &dequaw tor the 

aoAferllJDC8. ~ .ame 1fA7 baY9 to bo clono tor Newman. 

1 btaYo consulted i4na llff• ~ 10Ul" letter ot 44 l9rch relat1Jig 

to ~ docaaent oal.led froject11 end Fubl1cattona, etc. 41o botil agree lba' 

the tcmi 1D1l cncl.Ofled. ta sui\able tor bclueioa 1n Mid •mml. Ve did DO\ 

$aD up the mtter 1d*11 tho Dt.hotor ot Uie liaUoMl 13urQAU ct. s~ 

u J'OU ~~ dnccf '11&t c-nUezen ts ra~ hard to loCf.l.\e le\ al.one 

ld.Dt.U)' t.hoee do)'a. 

I a1w lq mv that. }lagm• lie•tenels baa brough• 7011 CJ;.lo-to-d.ate on 

\M aetUng \ha' ha ancl I. llowle, -4. Ulna he4 Mn u ~ ~. 

l think - 'flll 'IN able to pu.11 3C.AMP on \hia ...... mm t 811 loeldag 

~Gftllrftl '° uetng 10\l lJl Calttorrw.. 

001 3J 

3'.>12 (3) 

M/Rt SeU-explana\ory 

Ortga R.A.Le1blu/a•/'1 "VI 53 

BSS/Ba.20200/605'12 

Jt. A. LB!Bt.IB CA1e:t . 

Ma\hema\ioal lo11n!Ndl »lTildoa 

Olftae c4 :ste111Nh am Dnelasmmt 

1. S. ..,,, aftd I ftnlm.d \b1Jl 1"'-' t le&l'Dld. tba\ Ren'olJil Qmnh•a 

ma unn4 to4Rr. 

asGtt S0AJat Jt&rttoS_.,. 4M I It/;# &3. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-18-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-30-1997             MAR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1997             MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1997             SEP-28-1997
<CASH>                                          11,024                  11,024
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      597                     597
<ALLOWANCES>                                       331                     331
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,468                  11,468
<PP&E>                                           3,700                   3,700
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,500                   2,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,122                  20,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,181                   5,181
<BONDS>                                          1,000                   1,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        58,238                  58,238
<OTHER-SE>                                    (44,297)                (44,297)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,122                  20,122
<SALES>                                            433                     624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   536                     815
<CGS>                                              418                     857
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,887                   3,746
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  37                      34
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,279)                 (2,729)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (3)                     (5)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,282)                 (2,734)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     303                   1,228
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (979)                 (1,506)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.09)                  (0.19)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)                  (0.19)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>EPS is for continuing operations only.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### The Ryan Drug Company, Respondent, vs. Hvambsahl, Appellant.

*December 18,1895*—

*January 7, 1896.*

*Interest: Sale of chattels: Accounts stated: Demand,*

Goods were sold on open account, and statements were sent from' time to time, in which no interest was ever included. These statements were kept by the vendee without objection, and drafts were drawn upon him at intervals and paid. No other demand of payment was ever made. *Held,*that the statements constituted accounts stated, binding on both parties, and that in an action for a balance due no interest should be allowed except from the commencement of the action.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Eau Claire county: *W.*F. Bailey, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed.*

The plaintiff sold the defendant drugs upon open account running through a series of years. Statements of account were sent from time to time by the plaintiff to the defendant, in which no interest was ever included, and no objections were made thereto by the defendant. Drafts were drawn at intervals by the plaintiff, and paid by the defendant. No demand was ever made for the payment of the account, or any part of it, further than the sending of the statements and the drawing of drafts. On the 2d of September, 1893, there was due $493.11, for which an action was brought by the plaintiff, but no interest was claimed by the plaintiff in the complaint. Upon the trial there was . testimony on the part of the plaintiff that the goods were sold on sixty days’ time, and a verdict was directed and rendered for the plaintiff for the amount claimed in the complaint, with interest on the monthly balances through the whole period of the account, amounting in all, principal and interest, to $521.7?. From judgment on this verdict the defendant appealed.

*63For the appellant there was a brief by *Wickham*d? *Farr,*and oral argument by *James Wickham.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Geo. 0. <& Fred A. Teall,*and oral argument *bj-Fred A. Teall.*

Winslow, J.

No interest should have been allowed except from the time of the commencement of the action. There had been no demand for payment, and the statements of account sent by the plaintiff at regular intervals, and kept by the defendant, in which no interest was ever claimed, constituted accounts stated, binding on both parties, in the absence of fraud and mistake. *Cobb v. Arundell,*26 Wis. 553; *Chandler v. People's S. Bank,*61 Cal. 401.

*By the*Gourt.— Judgment reversed, and action remanded for a new trial.
The State of

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 23, 2014

No. 04-14-00661-CR

Clara SOTO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR9377

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

ORDER

A Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal has been filed in this appeal 

in which the trial court judge certifies that the underlying criminal case “is a plea-bargain case, 

and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” It is therefore ORDERED that the trial court clerk 

file an electronic clerk’s record within ten days from the date of this order containing the 

following documents:

1. All pre-trial orders and the related pre-trial motions;

2. The Court Admonishments, the Waiver, Consent to Stipulation of Testimony and 

Stipulations, and all other documents relating to the defendant’s plea bargain;

3. The judgment;

4. All post-judgment motions and orders;

5. The notice of appeal;

6. The Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal; and

7. The criminal docket sheet.
All other appellate deadlines are suspended pending further order of this court. The clerk of this 

court is ORDERED to send a copy of this order to the attorneys of record, the trial court clerk, 

and the court reporter(s) responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in this appeal.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of September, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court