alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1
List of Subsidiaries
Colonial Realty Limited Partnership

                                                          Jurisdiction of
Name                                                        Formation
------------                                             ----------------

A.    Colonial Properties Services Limited Partnership       Delaware
B.    Colonial Properties Services, Inc.                     Alabama
C.    Parkway Place Limited Partnership                      Alabama
D.    Colonial VRS, LLC                                      Georgia
E.    CMS/Colonial Joint Venture Limited Partnership         Alabama
      1.    Mountain Brook Manager, Inc.                     Alabama
      2.    Mountain Brook Manager, LLC                      Alabama
      3.    Mountian Brook, LLC                              Alabama
      4.    River Hills Manager, Inc.                        Delaware
      5.    River Hills Manager, LLC                         Delaware
      6.    River Hills, LLC                                 Delaware
      7.    Cahaba Manager, LLC                              Alabama
      8.    Cahaba, LLC                                      Alabama
      9.    Barrington Manager, LLC                          Georgia
      10.   Barrington, LLC                                  Georgia
      11.   Ponte Vedra Manager, LLC                         Delaware
      12.   Ponte Vedra, LLC                                 Delaware
      13.   Stockbridge Manager, LLC                         Georgia
      14.   Stockbridge, LLC                                 Georgia
F.    CMS/Colonial Joint Venture II Limited Partnership      Alabama
      1.    Inverness I Manager, LLC                         Alabama
      2.    Inverness I, LLC                                 Alabama
      3.    Inverness II Manager, LLC                        Alabama
      4.    Inverness II, LLC                                Alabama
      5.    Rocky Ridge Manager, LLC                         Alabama
      6.    Rocky Ridge, LLC                                 Alabama
      7.    Hillwood Manager, LLC                            Alabama
      8.    Hillwood, LLC                                    Alabama
G.    Heathrow E, LLC                                        Delaware
H.    Heathrow F, LLC                                        Delaware
I.    Heathrow 3, LLC                                        Delaware
J.    Heathrow 4, LLC                                        Delaware
K.    Heathrow G, LLC                                        Delaware
L.    Heathrow 6, LLC                                        Delaware
M.    Heathrow I, LLC                                        Delaware
N.    Heathrow Oakmonte, LLC                                 Delaware
O.    Highway 150, LLC                                       Alabama
P.    600 Building Partnership                               Alabama
Q.    Colonial/Polar BEK Management Company                  Alabama
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA 

FIFTH DISTRICT 

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED 

FREDERICK R. CLARKE, 

 Petitioner, 

v. Case No. 5D16-293 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

 Respondent. 

________________________________/ 

Opinion filed March 4, 2016 

Petition for Belated Appeal 

A Case of Original Jurisdiction. 

Frederick R. Clarke, Blountstown, pro se. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General 

Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Respondent. 

PER CURIAM. 

 The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed 

with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the September 2, 2015, 

order denying the petitioner’s motion for postconviction relief in Case No. 2010-CF-679, 

in the Circuit Court in and for St. Johns County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(c)(6)(D). 

 

PETITION GRANTED. 

LAWSON, C.J., ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, L. Decker Dawson, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dawson Geophysical Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Dated:August 9, 2005                                                       /s/ L. Decker Dawson   L. Decker Dawson   Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
Opinion issued August 31, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 18
- 00667
- CR

——————————— RONNIE PRICE , Appella nt

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1528933

MEMORANDUM OPINION2

Appellant attempts to appeal from an order deferring adjudication of guilt signed on February 21, 2017. 1 Appellant filed his notice of appeal on July 11, 2018. This notice of appeal is untimely. 2 In criminal cases, the appellant must file a notice of appeal “within 30 days after the day sentence is imposed.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.2(a)(1). Because the order appealed was signed on February 21, 2017, the deadline for filing the notice of appeal was March 23, 2017. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on July 11, 2018, more than a year too late. Thus, his notice of appeal was not t imely filed. Without a timely

- filed notice of appeal, we lack jurisdiction. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.1. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack a nd Justices Brown and Caughey. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2(b).

1 ` Although the State moved to adjudicate guilt in July 2017, the record , including the docket sheet with filings through July 18, 2018, shows no order granting this motion.

2 Additionally, the order of deferred adjudication was the result of a plea bargain between appellant and the State. The trial court’s certification of d efendant’s right to appeal indicates that appellant has no right to appeal because this is a plea

- bargain case.
# CE2004084EN.01086701.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/867 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/867

---

(2004/C 84 E/0959)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0750/04

by José García-Margallo y Marfil (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(11 March 2004)

Subject:   Possibility of registering rating agencies in Europe

Subject:

In the framework of Parliament's vote on the Katiforis report on rating agencies (A5-0040/2004 — P5_TA-PROV(2004)0080), what kind(s) of European registration scheme is the Commission planning to investigate?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(13 April 2004)

(13 April 2004)

With regard to the vote by Parliament on the report on rating agencies presented by Mr Katiforis, Mr Margallo would like to know what kind(s) of European registration schemes the Commission is planning to investigate.

The Commission would recall that, at the informal meeting of Economics and Finance Ministers in Oviedo in April 2002, it gave an undertaking to examine the role and methods of rating agencies as part of a raft of measures to be carried out in the wake of the Enron scandal.

At the same time, several initiatives were launched on the matter at international level. These include the work undertaken by the Financial Stability Forum (FSF), the International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) and national regulators such as the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Mr Katforis' report makes an important contribution to the matter. In October 2003 the Commission Directorate-General for the Internal Market set up four professional expert groups with a view to examining, among other things, the strategic priorities for the measures to be taken by the Commission in the coming years. One of these groups will focus in particular on the securities sector. The Commission will take into account the conclusions of these professional expert groups, which will be published by the end of April 2004, and open for public consultation from May to July 2004. A high-level conference will take place on 22/23 June 2004. Only after an analysis of the results of the public consultations and the conclusions of the high-level conference will the Commission adopt an official position on the subject of rating agencies in general and on the issue of their registration in Europe in particular.

---
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intermagnetics General Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending November 27, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Glenn H. Epstein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley ACT of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Glenn H. Epstein*
----------------------------
Glenn H. Epstein
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
January 6, 2006


* These certifications are being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed
"filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to
the liability of that Section. These certifications shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.







                                       36
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                         5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                  1,000
       
<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                        DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                                    4,411
<SECURITIES>                                                             89,604
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            40,196
<ALLOWANCES>                                                              2,700
<INVENTORY>                                                               6,432
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                        145,924
<PP&E>                                                                  236,078
<DEPRECIATION>                                                          114,752
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                          359,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                    44,659
<BONDS>                                                                 247,484
<COMMON>                                                                 19,202
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                               3,339
<OTHER-SE>                                                               18,454
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                            359,533
<SALES>                                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                         35,483
<CGS>                                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                            28,945
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                        6,513
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                          (5,365)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                              2,126
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                      (7,491)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           37,241
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                          (6,464)
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                             23,286
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                               .92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                               .81
        

</TABLE>
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release # 02-18

Contact: (703) 808-5050 Nov. 15, 2018

NRO Celebrates Ten Years of “Clean” Financial Audits

In an achievement unparalleled in the U.S. Intelligence Community, the National 

Reconnaissance Office (NRO) received a tenth consecutive unmodified (clean) audit of 

its annual financial statements.

“This decade of excellence is a testament to the strength of the financial and management 

controls of the NRO and to the women and men who are the trusted stewards of our 

federal resources,” said NRO Director Betty Sapp.

The audit was conducted by Kearney & Company, an independent public accounting 

firm. Kearney evaluated the reliability of financial data supporting NRO financial 

statements, the accuracy of the statements, and the accuracy of footnote disclosures in 

accordance with guidance issued by the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board, 

the Office of Management and Budget, and other authorities.

An unmodified or “clean” audit opinion means that the financial statements present fairly 

the financial position and the results of the organization’s operations in accordance with 

U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. NRO managers can confidently use this 

information in day-to-day decisions, knowing it is accurate and reliable. 

“I am extremely proud of the NRO team. Each year we continue to build upon the 

success of the previous year. Their continued diligent hard work provides an assurance to 

our oversight officials and the American public that we are deserving of their trust,” said 

Misty Tullar, NRO’s Chief Financial Officer and Director of NRO’s Business and Plans 

Operations Directorate.

 

 

-NROThe NRO is a Department of Defense-Intelligence Community organization responsible 

for developing, launching, and operating America’s intelligence satellites to meet the 

national security needs of our nation.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                    ------------

            WINTHROP RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATES I, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
            --------------------------------------------------------
                            FORM 10-QSB JUNE 30, 2002
                            -------------------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winthrop Residential Associates
I, A Limited Partnership, (the "Partnership"), on Form 10-QSB or the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:  August 13, 2002                      /s/ Michael L. Ashner
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Michael L. Ashner
                                            Chief Executive Officer

Date:  August 13, 2002                      /s/ Thomas C. Staples
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Thomas C. Staples
                                            Chief Financial Officer





                                    13 of 13
J.

J.

.. • - statutes, and the imposed sentence is within the statutory limits and is not unreasonably disproportionate to his crimes. NRS 193.330(1)(a)(1); NRS 199.480(1)(a); NRS 200.366(2); NRS 200.380(1). Therefore we conclude that his sentence does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the conviction AFFIRMED.



# i rsus. , J. Douglas

cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge Law Offices of John P. Parris Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A oate. 2
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.1

                                    CONSENT



     I hereby consent to the use of my name as a nominee for director of Prime

Response, Inc. (the "Company") in the Company's Registration Statement on Form

S-1 to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.



Date:  November 30, 1999      /s/ Marc McMorris
                              -----------------------------------------
                              Marc McMorris
# CE2004084EN.01019501.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/195 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/195

---

(2004/C 84 E/0237)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0299/04

by Christopher Heaton-Harris (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(6 February 2004)

Subject:   Compact disc pricing in the EU

Subject:

It has come to my attention that compact discs ordered for delivery in the UK and Ireland will incur a surcharge as companies will only be able to deliver compact discs manufactured within the EU, thus increasing the production costs.

Could the Commission confirm that all compact discs sold and delivered in the UK and Ireland will have to be manufactured in Europe? If so, what are the regulations governing this change in law?

If this is true, does the Commission agree it is against EU competition rules?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(16 March 2004)

(16 March 2004)

The Commission is not aware of any provision that would require that all compact discs sold and delivered in the United Kingdom and Ireland would have to be manufactured in Europe. More information is needed to take a position on the applicability of the Community competition rules.

---
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-2473 

_____________________________

DARRYL EDWARD MCKNIGHT JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.

November 29, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, RAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Darcy Townsend, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 59/2006

of 2 June 2006         

amending Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Annex IX to the Agreement shall be amended as follows:

Article 2

The texts of Directive 2005/68/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 3 June 2006, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 2 June 2006.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

R. WRIGHT            

----

(1)OJ L 147, 1.6.2006, p. 50.

(2)OJ L 323, 9.12.2005, p. 1.

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

----