alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________ ) NIKITA PETTIES, et al . ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 95-0148 (PLF) ) THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al . ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________)

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING FAIRNESS HEARING On November 9, 2012, the Court entered an Order granting the Motion for Preliminary Approval of Dismissal submitted jointly by plaintiffs’ Class Counsel and counsel for the District of Columbia. [Dkt No. 2044]. Before granting a final joint motion to dismiss, which would resolve the claims of the members of th e certified class, the Court must determine that such dismissal would be fair to the class. See F ED
. R. C IV
. P. 23(e). Members of the class have been notified of the proposed dismissal and of th e basis for the joint motion, namely, that “[t]he parties have agreed that the District of Columbia has met its responsibility to make accurate and timely payments to providers of special education and related services and to provide special education students with safe and effective trans portation to and from school.” Notice to Class Members at 1 [Dkt. No. 2043-1]. Class members were also informed that objections to the proposed dismissal would be considered by the Court if filed by December 13, 2012. Class members were invited to present any objections they might have at a fairness hearing to be held on December 19, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 29A of the William B. Bryant Courthouse Annex.The Court has not received any timely written objections to the proposed dismissal or requests to speak. The Court, in its discretion, will consider late-filed objections or requests to speak received in writing by noon on December 18, 2012. In light of the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED that at the start of the fairness hearing, Class Counsel and government counsel will each make presentations explaining why their client or clients are moving for dismissal of this suit, and briefly explaining th eir proposal regarding the use of funds deposited in the Court Registry [Dkt. No. 2055] and the jo int motion for attorneys’ fees [Dkt. No. 2057]; it is FURTHER ORDERED that Supervising Court Master David Gilmore and Special Master Elise Baach each may make a short presentation explaining their views on the proposed dismissal and, with respect to Ms. Baach, the use of funds in the Court Registry; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that thereafter any additional persons or groups to whom the Court in its discretion grants permission, may present oral objections or comments, to which counsel and/or Mr. Gilmore or Ms. Baach may respond. SO ORDERED.
/s/_____________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN DATE: December 14, 2012 United States District Judge

2
~---'~_Commandlng ~i~e/_,._ ___ __ 

;:sst C ~nda 

----z-~:ni Co es ------~~ trative 0 ficer 

st Admin Offi~r ----- AdJutant --------~ Asst AdJutant --...,.--..,.---------- ----------- ___ _,_ _____ _ Chief, Admin Branch ----------- ------- Info & Liaison Branch ---------- --- Chief, A Branch --~----- ---------- ---------Chief,, B Branch ____ ...,.,... ____ ~ 

------~-Chief, C Branch __ ~~--------- Chief, D Branch -~--~ ---------- Chief, E Branch --------- ------------ Chief, F Branch ----~-- ------------ Chief, G Bran ch ------- ------------ 2 d Sig Serv Bn. -~------D ------------- ::t.r of Training --------- ·--------- Proper -cy- Officer ---------- ---------- Int e 11 i gen c e Officer 

----------Personnel Officer ------

' Provost ~arshal ---------- --~--------

----------Post Engineer _.,,,._,,, _ ________ __ Classified Mail Room -------- ------- 8 e c re ta ry to C. 0 --------~General Files -------

201 Flies ------~ ------------------

Comments and Return 

---------Recommendations ----~--

' -In.formation and Return 

----------Information and Forwarding 

Information and File - -----Signature, if approved ---------See Note on Back -----

As Requested --------- -------------- As Tu..scussed ---------- --------------- Your Action ---------

~~ --------------~ 

dl. ~-...~- /:.~ 

-~~~~ 

~~~-~~~ 

DT £4.. ~~A~ 

~~~~ ;; 
N~~~er 

action 

l 

1394 

ToDir. of Communications 

Pesearch 

TBRU. 

Chief, C Br. 

~ 

/ 

( 

Memorandum 

1. Analytical study has been completed 

on the transposition device submitted by Col. 

Tiltman. 

2. The study showed that this type o:f 

transposition possesses a high degree of 

security, solution depending upon the occurren< e 

of at least four messages in depth so that 

anagramming is possible. No solutions were 

effected on messages not in depth. 

3. From an operational viewpolllt, however, the device showed several physical d:Lsadvantages • 

a. Both encipherment and deciphermeni 

were slow and subject to error. 

Name, Division or Branch, and Date 

\ b. The device is cumbersome to handlE 

1 and diff:t.cult to use. 

c. The glass surface does not take 

ink, pencilled letters will not wash off, and 

the letters are at all tl.Illes difficult to read 

d. The blacked-out portions smear 

when exposed to dampness. Black, gunnned, removable tape would be more satisfactory. 

4. Some of the above physical obJections 

could perhaps be overcome, but 1t is not 

believed that the need for a new transposition 

system is sufficient to warrant developing a 

device sl.Illilar to this one. ( - ,_P~~ 

I k;'os~phLf _• Martan 

l MaJor, SPSIC-4 

Ext. 261, 20 Apr 44 

FCA, Erl. 262 

G0N tl et"NTb\L
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1689 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1689

To amend title 23, United States Code, to reduce the funding available 
  for a State under the national highway performance program and the 
surface transportation program if the State issues a license plate that 
   contains an image of a flag of the Confederate States of America, 
    including the Battle Flag of the Confederate States of America.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 25, 2015

   Mr. Brown introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 23, United States Code, to reduce the funding available 
  for a State under the national highway performance program and the 
surface transportation program if the State issues a license plate that 
   contains an image of a flag of the Confederate States of America, 
    including the Battle Flag of the Confederate States of America.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCTION OF APPORTIONMENT FOR CERTAIN FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY 
              PROGRAMS.

    Section 104 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(h) Reduction of Apportionment for Certain Federal-Aid Highway 
Programs.--The amount apportioned to a State under paragraphs (1) and 
(2) of subsection (b) shall be reduced by an amount equal to 5 percent 
of those funds--
            ``(1) effective beginning on October 1 of the first fiscal 
        year beginning after the date of enactment of this subsection, 
        for each fiscal year in which the State issues a license plate 
        that contains an image of a flag of the Confederate States of 
        America, including the Battle Flag of the Confederate States of 
        America; and
            ``(2) effective beginning on October 1 of the second fiscal 
        year beginning after the date of enactment of this subsection, 
        for each fiscal year in which the State allows a license plate 
        described in paragraph (1) and issued by the State before the 
        first fiscal year referred to in that paragraph to be displayed 
        on a motor vehicle registered in the State.''.
                                 <all>
```
REF ID:A38739 

DEPARTMENT OF • • 

MATHEMATICS AND ASTRONOMY 

THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA 

NORMAN OKLAHOMA 

July 21, 19.51 

Mr. Willial'l F. Friedman ~rrael Forces Security Services 

Nashington, D. C. 

Dear Mr • Friedman 

One of the mathe1118t1cal Journals LScripta Mathematica] 

plans to publish my short article and a bibliography of 

easily available references on cryptography. The ed:J.tor 

has suggested it might be desirable to publish photographs 

of the Ha_el.J..n [C-38 and BC-38] conveI'ters and of MAGIC 

(if available). Since photographs of the Hagelin machines 

have already appearej in print [Bulletin of the American 

Society of Swedish Engineers--October 1941] there should 

be no security objections to their republication. If you 

can supply us with photographs of the Hagelin converters, 

of MAGIC and/or of any other interesting cryptographic 

I'la.Chines [even the t'-94J we woull be pleased and grateful. 

I also wish to ask if you have arry publications or 

articles concerni~g cryptography which are more easily 

availaole to the mathematics student and teacher than the 

~iverbank publications an~ the restricted Nar Department 

Publications [M1l1tar3 Cr-JPtanal.ysis, for example]. I 

would certainly not wish to o~it reference to any article 

of yours which was available to teachers. 

RVA klg 

Sincerely yours, 

R. V Andree 

Assistant Professor 

of ll.athema. tics 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-11-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

  As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use in this
registration statement of our report dated February 24, 1999 (except with
respect to the matters discussed in Note 12, as to which the date is June 28,
1999) included herein and to all references to our Firm included in this
registration statement.

                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
July 15, 1999
.. 

'f 6P SBenSl' A1SA-00T/ et 

MEMOlWIDUU FOR CAPTAIN WENGER 

SUBJECTt Your meMo to DtRA18At Subjeot - ttGlobal structure ror u.s. 

OOlaN'l' Activities." 

1. It ie obvious that an approved u.s. Giobal Structure ia a prfllrequieite to dil!louasions or plans !or a CM.bined structure, juet as you 

ao.7 in paragl"aph 1 or your memo. The chari. lfhieh accompanies your memo 

forms an excellent basis tor the development of the U.S. structure and 

with one or two except:lons depicts the situation as it actually exiats. 

2. The exceptions rof"erred to above have to deal with AFSA 

'!beater Centers and the present 5erV"iee Cryptologic Alf.ency thcator 

organizations woh a.s ASAPACJ and ASAE. I think that the latter could 

and ehould have been shown on your chart as intermediate between 

nservice Cr,yptologie lten.dquarters 11 and "Service Field (Mobile) COllINT 

Activitiee.11 

j. Were the latter ehown on the chart, aerte.in lines would also 

have to be dra1'n, ahowing the relAtionehips between those theater 

organ11!58.tiona, .AFSA Headquarters, end AFSA Theater Centera. 

4. V.ith respect to AFB.A Theater Centers, I foresee heavy argul!'ente with the l!ervices, unless we ata.rt out by pointing out that an 

AFSA 'lbeater Center ie eeeent1al to the proper coordination or service 

Cryptologic Agency theater organ1zat1ona, Thie, o~ couree, brings up 

the question ae to whether both types or organizations are neeeeear,y in 

a theater; that is, could an JJISA Theater Center do everything the.t is 

necessary to be done by Servieo cryptologic Agena,- theater organ1~ations. 

At the motl.ent it appears to me that the argument between AFSA a.rid the 

Services 'With regard to proccesing in the u.s. wouJ.d be repeated on a 

eMa.ller sea.le; but the basic principles at issue would be the mame. 

s. Perhaps a reeolution of the present problem 'ffith rospeet to 

processing in the ZI would pave the way tor a proper eolution ot the 

queetion of proper organ1mation !or processing at theater level. 

6. There is one elunent 'Which is vital to the whole COYINT Global 

:>tructure and which is entirely omitted trom. yaur chart. But th• 

arlaeion is not by oversight on 7out" part. Reference here ie to the 

!unctions or evaluation and dissemination. Unleea there is a unified 

or joint evaluation-dieae..r:tination off ioe at each unified command there 

will be chaos. If such & unification is highly desirable at the Z.I. 

level (!!. know it is but so far have bean unable to put the idea across); 

it ta a.boolutely eeeential, I think, &t '11leater level. The CONSIDO 

idea should be carried out !'rom top to bottom in the whole structure~ 

Without it 1C'9 will be lees effective and will interpoee unnecessal"Y' 

security- hazard• which might well be disastrous, especially if there is 

u .. s .. -u,x. collaboration 'With third parties in any- ooFlbat zoneSECRET WILLI.~ 1, P'RIEDMAU 

A.FSA-COT 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-05-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 

I 

• 

I 

I 

E 

I 

~ I
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-01-1997
<CASH>                                           2,013
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,155
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,466
<PP&E>                                          12,463
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,469
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,348
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,479
<BONDS>                                          5,185
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              210
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,094
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,348
<SALES>                                         15,455
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,455
<CGS>                                           11,443
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,443
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    10
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,523
<INCOME-TAX>                                       922
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,601
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,601
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1432

LACKAWANNA TRANSPORT COMPANY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA; WETZEL COUNTY 

SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY; PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONER MICHAEL 

ALBERT, in his official capacity; PUBLIC SERVICE 

COMMISSIONER JON W. MCKINNEY, in his official capacity; 

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONER ED STAATS, in his official 

capacity,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, 

Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:08-cv-00066-FPS-JES)

Submitted: January 5, 2011 Decided: January 24, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrick J. McDermott, MCDERMOTT & BONENBERGER, P.L.L.C., 

Wheeling, West Virginia; Albert A. DeGennaro, William F. Fox, 

Jr., LACKAWANNA TRANSPORT COMPANY, Audubon, Pennsylvania, for 

Appellant. Thomas E. Buck, Jason P. Pockl, BAILEY & WYANT, 

P.L.L.C., Wheeling, West Virginia; Silas B. Taylor, OFFICE OF 
2

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West 

Virginia, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Lackawanna Transport Company appeals the district 

court’s orders granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss 

Lackawanna’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims against them. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Lackawanna Transp. Co. v. Public Serv. Comm’n of W. Va., 

No. 5:08-cv-00066-FPS-JES (N.D. W. Va. March 16, 2010; May 14, 

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated statements of income and balance sheets and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          26,256
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,478
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,960
<PP&E>                                          54,940
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,571
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 127,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,613
<BONDS>                                            500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           345
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,180
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   127,001
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,892
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,596
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (652)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,460
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,467
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,993
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (7,756)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,763)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 27, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 134631 & (68) Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan JAMES LEWIS, Petitioner-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134631 COA: 261349 State Tenure Comm: 04-000008 BRIDGMAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Respondent-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 8, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to a ppeal, we REVERSE the judgmen t of the Court of Appeals because the teacher tenure act, MCL 38.101 et seq ., does not require the State Tenure Commission to apply a “clear erro r,” rather than a “d e novo,” standard of review to its consideration of the preliminary decisions of administrative law judges. We REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of whether the Commission’s decision was arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion; or unsupported by competent, material, and substantial evidence on the whol e record. See Const 1963, art 6, § 28; MCL 24.306(1)(d), (e). The motion for stay is DENIED.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

p1219 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 27, 2007

Clerk
\ 

REF ID:A71898 

12 August 1952 

fO g 03 

VIA & 302 

03T 

Project SCAMP has concerned itself principall7 vi.th problemn of the 

following type: To determine a permutation (or a set of permutations) 

which matisf;r a large number of con.clitions, each of vhich is11 1n itaelt0 , 

verT weak. 'ho cla.Hea of these problem11 have been cona1derecl. F1rat, 

too detormina.tion of L&tin cq_uares 0 orthogonal Latin ~So and finite 

projective plsneso This st~ baa been carried on publicl.7 and received 

th.a cooperation of mathematiei8118 not attached to the proJecto !be 

ascond class of problems has been along liDG• similar to wheel wirinc 

recove17 from 1somorpha. Va.rioua aspects of the technique known u 

Robertao method have been diecusaed in clozed eeac1ona., 

It 111 difficult to aaeees the worth of SCAMP at this Ume dDce 

its value dependg ch1ofl.T on whether or n.ot we are able to attract and 

hold the 1nt.o:eet of the ma.tbema.tiaians we have hired. At the tim I 

left, I felt real interest ln our problemm w.m mant:teot., As a oriticitlll 

ot the project I would nggest tha.' better 8.l"r8.DBemeDt1 concemiDc 

clearance are necessary ao that ve can discues our theont1cal que•tiou 

in the pJ'Oper practical 'background. On the queat1on of location. the 

remoteness of o-ar pod tion certainl.T relieved 118 personal.17 of m.DJ" ot 

U!a Uit1t:ractions which inh1b1 t c!etaahed thinking, aD4 I worked out a 

3chems ( Teey tentative to ba eure) which liq' be of contd.dere.ble val:ue in 

th0 ettack on STURGEON. It 1• doubthl. that I mhoul.d eve:r ban :toancl 

two uninterrupted hours to devote to this problem here iu Vaahington. 

cc CO! ... / 

Oaf 

34 

35 

302 

03'1' 

341 

Rea.cling :rue 

Ao M. GLEASOJr 

LCDll US& 

Head. 341 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-11-2014 pursuant to E .0. 1352a