alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-- ""' - ~79 ·e 

2'J 

USCIB: 'CJ .1/16 

lB January 1954 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Loan of ROCKEX Crypto System to West Germans. 

Reference: USCIB 'CJ .1/14 (Minutes of 99th Meeting). 

The enclosure is forwarded ~or information in connection with 

the reference. 

Enclosure 

GCHQ MSG 151735Z/l/54. 

I 

USCIB: 29.1/16 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-18-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

'l'OP SE!CRE!'I' 
From: G.C.H.Q. 

BRITISH JOINT SERVICES MISSION 

MAIN NAVY BUILDING 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

to Bri adier Tiltman. 

DTG: 151735Z/l/54. 

To: S.L.O., Washington. 

Germans have replied they are very grateful for off er of 

Rockex but no longer wish to accept and will use Book and One-time 

Pads. They said that at time of first approach to us they expected 

conference to open first week in January and feared there was 

insufficient time to train necessary staff in Book Cypher procedure. 

Postponement has given them time for this. 

2. They had also told us they intended to use two speech circuits 

Berlin/Bonn with conunercial scrambler. We have warned them this 

affords no proGection whatsoever and they have taken note. 

Enclosure with USCIB 2$ .1/16 

'l'OP SECltET
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       1,321,000
<SECURITIES>                                 3,070,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,513,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,020,000
<PP&E>                                      40,919,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (18,950,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,989,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          795,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     1,383,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,989,000
<SALES>                                      7,358,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,358,000
<CGS>                                        7,302,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,302,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                120,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (43,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             77,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    77,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 40515 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. VICTOR JAVIER MUNOZ

- ZAMORA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12

- CR

- 2045

- 1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Victor Javier Munoz

- Zamora (Munoz) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011)

. Munoz has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Munoz ’ s response . We concur with counsel’s assessment

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 2 1 , 20 14 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40515 Document: 00512539972 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2014No. 13

- 40515
that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-40515 Document: 00512539972 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2014
#### A. B. Kuhlman Company, Respondent, vs. Cave, Appellant.

*March 12*

March *31, 1908.*

*Guaranty: Acceptance: Notice.*

In an action upon the following written guaranty: “I request that should C., ag’t, . . . order goods from you at any time after date of this letter of credit until further notice, that you ship the same to order of said agent, and I hereby guarantee payment for the same within twenty days after the arrival of goods at destination,” *held,*that the letter constituted an offer merely, which did not become a contract until accepted and notice of acceptance given to the guarantor.

Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for St. Croix county: E. W. HelMs, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed.*

Eor tbe appellant tbe cause was submitted on tbe brief of *B. B. Kinney*and W. *F. McNally.*,

*A. J.*Kinney, for tbe respondent.

WiNsnow, C. J.

Tbis is an action upon a written guaranty. There is no bill of exceptions. Tbe case was tried by tbe court and findings made to tbe effect: Tbat on June 6> 1906, the plaintiff company made a written contract with one Leon H. Cave, by which said Cave agreed to canvass certain territory for the sale of certain publications to be ordered by bim from tbe plaintiff company and paid for by bim within thirty days from tbe date of shipment, and tbat on July 7, 1906, tbe defendant executed and delivered to the plaintiff a written instrument or letter, of which the material part was as follows:

> “I request tbat should Mr. Leon IT. Cave, ag’t, . . . order goods from you at any time after date of tbis letter of credit until further notice, tbat you ship same to order of said agent, and I hereby guarantee payment for the same within twenty days after tbe arrival of tbe goods at destination.”

*280That said Leon H. Cave subsequently and about tbe last of July, 1906, ordered and received from plaintiff goods to the amount of $163.98, which have never been paid for or returned, except that the sum of $5 was paid, whereby the defendant became liable to the plaintiff in the sum of $158.98. Judgment was rendered for this sum and the defendant appeals.

It is plain that this judgment was erroneous. The writing sued on was simply a letter of credit and constituted an offer merely on the part of the defendant, which would not become a contract until accepted and notice of acceptance given to the guarantor. This has been so recently held by this court that no extended discussion of the principle is either desirable or necessary. *Miami Co. Nat. Bank v. Goldberg,*133 Wis. 115, 113 N. W. 391. See, also, *New Home S. M. Co. v. Simon,*104 Wis. 120, 80 N. W. 71. No acceptance or notice of acceptance was found by the court; hence no completed contract of guaranty was made and no liability incurred.

*By the Gov,ft.*— Judgment reversed, and action remanded with directions to render judgment for the defendant.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32
                          CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of North American
Palladium Ltd. (the "Registrant") on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), James D. Excell, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Registrant, and Ian M. MacNeily, as Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer of the Registrant, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of his knowledge, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.


/s/ James D. Excell
---------------------------------
By:    James D. Excell
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
April 5, 2006


/s/ Ian M. MacNeily
---------------------------------
By:    Ian M. MacNeily
Title: Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
April 5, 2006

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of
section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Gregory S. Furness, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Delphax Technologies
Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |     |  |                                                    
|------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 10, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Gregory S. Furness                             
|                    |  |     |  | Gregory S. Furness                                 
|                    |  |     |  | Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
# CE2004084EN.01055201.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/552 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/552

---

(2004/C 84 E/0629)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0220/04

by Mario Borghezio (NI) to the Commission

(30 January 2004)

Subject:   Threats to Po Valley producers as a result of the euro's excessive rise against the dollar

Subject:

The European Trade Commissioner, Pascal Lamy recently expressed concern at the strength of the euro exchange rate against the dollar, saying that this could harm Europe's competitiveness, yet at the same time the spokesman for the Commissioner for economic and monetary affairs, Gerassimos Thomas, confirmed the Commission's determination to pursue a strong euro.

Statements by ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet that the strengthening of the single currency is having a negative impact on exports seem to confirm Mr Lamy's concern, but he goes on to say that exports are holding up despite the strong euro.

What measures does the Commission intend to take to allay the fears expressed, in particular by small businesses in the Po Valley, that any further strengthening of the European currency could cause losses of around two billion euros to producers in the north-east of the Po Valley within a few months?

Answer given by Mr Solbes Mira on behalf of the Commission

(5 March 2004)

(5 March 2004)

The euro has undergone an appreciation of around 25 per cent against the dollar since the start of 2003. However, what matters for competitiveness is the real effective exchange rate. The real effective exchange rate is based on the evolution of the euro against a basket of currencies, weighted according to their importance in the external trade of the euro area. It also takes into account differences in inflation rates. The euro-area real effective exchange rate has only appreciated by around 8 % since January 2003 (when deflated by nominal unit labour costs) and by 3 % since 1999.

While a strengthening euro does have a negative impact on the competitiveness of euro-area exports, this effect has been offset by a rebound in the growth of world trade, as economic activity in the major regions of the global economy continues to strengthen. Furthermore, a stronger euro helps to support higher domestic demand in the euro area.

The Commission believes that a stable exchange rate is in Europe's interest. It will closely monitor developments in foreign exchange markets over the coming months.

Concerning small businesses (up to 50 employees) in the Po Valley, one of the major objectives of Structural Funds actions in Italy is to promote an increase in the competitiveness of firms, notably by promoting product and process innovation, in order to strengthen their export-capacity: Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) also benefit from the leverage effect of venture capital and guarantee instruments managed by the European Investment Fund.

---
**Exhibit
      32**




**Certification
      of CEO and Manager of Administration and Senior Controller**


**and
      acting Chief Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of North American Palladium Ltd. (the
      "Registrant") on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), James
      D. Excell, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, and
      Michael C. Thompson, as Manager of Administration and Senior Controller and
      acting Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, each hereby certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.





/s/ James
              D.
              ExcellBy:James
              D. ExcellTitle:President
                and Chief Executive Officer
              March
                30, 2007


/s/ Michael
                C. ThompsonBy:Michael
                C. ThompsonTitle:Manager
                  of Administration and Senior Controller and acting Chief Financial
                  Officer
                March
                  30, 2007







This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes
      of
      section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 3.3


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                            OF RESTATED CERTIFICATE
                        OF INCORPORATION OF LYCOS, INC.

Lycos, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, does hereby certify that:

FIRST:    The name of the Corporation is Lycos, Inc. (the "Corporation").

SECOND:   The date on which the Certificate of Incorporation for this
Corporation was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware is
June 1, 1995.  A Restated Certificate of Incorporation was filed with the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on April 4, 1996 (the "Restated
Certificate").

THIRD:    The following amendment to the Restated Certificate was duly adopted
in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware (the "General Corporation Law") by resolutions duly
adopted by the Board of Directors of this Corporation and was approved by the
stockholders in a special meeting of the stockholders on August 13, 1998 called
and held in accordance with the General Corporation Law:

     Article FOURTH of the Restated Certificate is hereby amended by deleting
     the first paragraph of said Article FOURTH and replacing such paragraph
     with the following:

     "FOURTH:  The total number of shares of all classes of capital stock which
     the Corporation shall have the authority to issue is 105,000,000 shares,
     consisting of 100,000,000 shares of Common Stock with a par value of $.01
     per share (herein called the "Common Stock") and 5,000,000 shares of
     Preferred Stock with a par value of $.01 per share (herein called the
     "Preferred Stock")."

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Corporation has caused this Certificate of
Amendment to be signed by its Vice President in Waltham, Massachusetts this 13th
day of August, 1998.

                                    LYCOS, INC.


                                           /s/ Thomas Guilfoile
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    Thomas Guilfoile, Vice President of
                                    Finance and Administration
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       81,841
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        840
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                           9,643
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         1,320
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,644
<COMMON>                                             0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       27,806
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             10,246
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  38,052
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            27,599
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                        5,047
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      600
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                        423
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    64
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  21,859
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                   93,644
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       30,178
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             1,773
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       6,856
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      12,677
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          4,940
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  48
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   4,988
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         2,117
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,871
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    2,871
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        1,849
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          10,804
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
REF ID:A72184 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

EXECtrrIVE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 

EXECUTIVE APPRAISAL AT AMERICAN ENKA CORPORATION 

Session 5 

Group B 

OBJECTIVES 

14 October 

0900-1100 

Room 1224, NSS 

To discuss the possibilities of introducing Executive 

Appraisal as an integral part of NSA's Executive Development Program .. 

AGENDA 

1.. Presentation by Mro William A .. Egerton, General Attorney 

and Director of Industrial Relations, American Enka Corporation, of his 

company' e program of Personnel Development, the basis of which is 

Executive Appraisal. 

Mr. Egerton has been an early adapter of Virgil Rowland's 

ideas on Executive Appraisal. and has included them as the cornerstone 

of his program at American Enka. Since Mr. Egerton has a successful 

Executive Development Program, it is believed he can contribute some 

ideas which you may incorporate into a program for NSA,. 

2. Discussion by the group of Executive Appraisal as the 

initial step in an over-all program of Executive Development in NSA. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 02-06-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Riggs National Corporation (the Company)
for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Steven T. Tamburo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. By:   /s/ Steven T. Tamburo
Name: Steven T. Tamburo
Chief Financial Officer
May 10, 2005
REF ID:A59620 

'TOP SECR:B'F 

'i'OP SEBRm - tJ.8. EffB ONLY 

SUBJECT' NUMBER 

• 

FINAL 

USCIB: lJ.5/56. Item 5 of the Agenda for the 102nd Meeting of USCIB, 

held on 9 April 1954. 

Subject: The Anderson Case (13.5/53). 

THE ACTING CHAIRMAN (Lt. General Cabell) re~uested the Executive 

Secretary to make an oral repo~ concerning the Anderson case so that 

the members might be into:rmed of its present status. 

CAPTAIN '!'AYLOR renewed the background of the Anderson case. He 

reported that the FBI has intemewed Anderson's mother and learned 

that he has returned to the U.S. He explained that the Executive 

Committee has considered this problem and has agreed that it would be 

desirable to interview Anderson on a frank and friendly basis. 

Accordingly, the Anr:I¥ has agreed to send a representative of ASA to 

conduct the interview. He went on to say that a letter has been sent 

to Anderson by ASA advising that Colonel Schwieker would be in the area 

on other business and asking Anderson if he would care to discuss his 

experiences. Captain Taylor then referred. the Board to USCIB 13.;/~.3, 

dated 7 April 1954, which outlines the method of handl~ and information desired. 

GmlERAL REICHELDERFER advised that the A~ had confined the 

purpose stated in' their letter to a discussion of Anderson's experiences with ASA(E). 

DE<lISION: (9 April.1954) USCIB, after receiving an oral report from 

the Executive Secretary on the Anderson case, approved the method of 

handl"ing and manner in which the interview is to be conducted. 

USCIB: 13.5/56 - 18 -

TOPSBORBf' 

eclassified and a roved or release b NS on 02-24-2014 ursuantt E.O. 1352