alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                 Exhibit 23.2



      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT 
      CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Board of Directors
PHAMIS, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-67981) on Form S-4, as amended as of March 22, 1999, and in the registration
statements (Nos. 333-31047, 333-31045, 33-1502) on Form S-8 of IDX Systems
Corporation of our report dated January 31, 1997, except for note 14 to the
PHAMIS, Inc. and subsidiaries' consolidated financial statements which is as of
March 25, 1997, relating to the consolidated statements of income, shareholders'
equity, and cash flows of PHAMIS, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended
December 31, 1996, which report appears in the December 31, 1998 annual report
on Form 10-K of IDX Systems Corporation.


KPMG LLP


Seattle, Washington
March 29, 1999
·. • 

REF ID:A72039 

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS 

DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS 

URBANA, ILLINOIS 

• 

November ;, 1952 

Armed Forces Security Agency Washington 25, D. c. 

Att 1 n Mr. W. F. Friedman 

Dear Mr. Friedman: 

A number of names have occured to me of mathematicians 

not involved in the 1952 SCAMP who might be interesting for next 

summer. Thus far I have had no chanc~ to fina out whether any of 

them would be both available and willing but I pass their names along 

to you in accords.nee with our recent conversation •. 

R. H. Bruck, Associate Professor, University of Wisconsin 

Sarvadaman Chowla, Visiting Professor, University of Kansas, 

Lawrence, Kansas. (I believe he 1s Indian by birth. 

Would this rule him out?) 

E. E. Moise, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. _(He is 

known to Campaigne and has had relevant naval experience.) Gordan Pall, Illinois Institute ot Technology, Chicago, Ill • . H.J. Ryser, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio .. 

With the exception of Moise, the above were suggested by Albert because of their research being closely related to finite projectiv~ 

planes. I should hope that Albert might also be one of next summer's 

group.. Saunders MacLane and Marshall Stone~ both of the University of Chicago, may already have the necessary clearances and might be 

useful if they are willing. ; I 

Last summer I felt from the ~tart that a few really good statisticians would be useful but they were not available at 

such short notice. I may wish to consult with Se.m Wilks at 

Princeton co~cerning suitable personnel. I.believe Wilks has the 

necessary clearances. 

I hope to see you on Honday·but I am transmitting these names in advance just in case you w1s~ to do something in 

connection with them. 

Yours sincerely, 

-. . .. ,\. ~ s! s .. Cairns 

Head of the Department 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 02-12-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

' ' .-;.~c I _.
Development of Zone Energy Use Intensities 

I 

Generic Square Building I 

15-zone, 3-story prototype 1 

5 independent zones per floor (1 core and 4 ! 

i 

, perimeter zones) I 

HVAC Efficiency 

I Zone EUI data , 

I 

 6450-01-P COMMENT 02DD
Aggregation to National Commercial Building 

EUI Estimates 

1 

I I Zone EUI data 

I I I Cooling Equipment 1 i Shipping Data 

I I 

I 

CoreIPer~meterl 

FloorLevel EUI data 

I 

Economizer I 

Weighting by Climate 

I Cllmate to Sub , I I / CBECS Census 

I D~v~slon Data I 

1 Heating Fuel Data , I Wall Type Data I 

CBECS 

Census D~wsron Data 

Bu~ldlng S~ze 

Aspect Ratio 

Number of Floors 

Locat~on 

Census Mapplng 1 I I 

Building Level 

Aggregation of EUI 

data 

1 

1 CBECS Census I I I' Welghtlng by Heatlng / 

Construction Fuel and Wall data 1 I ,Floorspace Buildlng Dlv~slon We~ghting Type Data 

I 

1 Census Commercial I 

I Building Construction , 

, Estimates 

i 

1 I 

I Sub Census Dlvislon 

I 

Aggregation by 

Representatwe 

Bulld~ng Type 

EIA National Site1 

Source Energy , Conversion 

/ Natlonal Avg I 

i Slte EUI 

, Source EUI 

\ 

I 

\, 1 

,\ ECI i 

 6450-01-P COMMENT 02DD
4.Frior.f,

t-

!`ktHin'843134

elf

",s

"Ile°

•••n•-.4r or- amr•nre.‘10 .....4 41/10 .1_2rAfir ,

i re • I

; .YRISURC4 /17 eina: 'USAF,

Ctfl.efs nS *tip, it, ,..Syspaps

/2(L:

RE

tf :

E.FOItAIL

(NZ

..,r"..

1.4 D
.

•

(F) THE AONER TRACKING AND ±RDi IONS

cotraimouit

•

; • t e, •••

r

•-,, z • :•T

titt4401144t qamovrivitparoa D:IscOvaRER- .1(n: 4.8 F.04,9Yit

". ,

MarkalfINCE" DETAVitEk.- ODJECTiVES 11100s•4404044. rSECTIOIt

BURNOUT %POINT win

AND A VELOD %Tin 500 -FPS

itIAPTI1: inir.,ithitigiAtin? THE fa-melt

nIG.4T1*INORCI*41tr&

Al , 0

(.417 .T.tui . A4ENi;:as*-applarra mugs PROVIDE, :THE paws!. an9igaz.

sittoainon ADD AGENA PROPULSION SYSTEM PROVIDE „

.44E io.,-,birairritokivripcity.',.,4 •

• .

, — — • • . • ..

, .

-• (D) • TO • 4 • 111.1141744Ate.. 13.x MOST PROVIDE THE ELECTRI.•

4 CAL.. Pon• 12033.01r1' -SATi..praOrttyAripas OPERATION.

(B) ;`131S• 'ArdfliA:::Ggx.POcrs' AND GPW!W rialpt, MUST DERIVE

THE • T/Mt TO 'PlIVATE! cggfilAV, a • igx.D:rris svirpairti404E-GgieD

,

-;

DURING ..ourrix• atosit; 91t4tri1‘..460ST

is

N ACCORDANCE 'XX* TOES; V `MUST ' -RAMAN

PROPER-4E1=12 ATTITUDE AFTER SEPARATION AND MUST CONTROL Oa rim

AND SEQUENCE ' 7-Owtantilawg131j . 0?, 1 41T7mis•- 4'


• .i7QIINTDO$41

f . • . .

f, 'James , Att'rAcT.D;saucKIinzumehr UP' /AID it•sams .. • . • • *. • ...4".• •

CIJAAIONCE ttZRAINS 

r• ^

IN1104...iENE NE& ONE Howl AND,rintwrz

• rwus DISCOVERER

. . •

BE. FIVE-- 1, . •

. .

; •

.'s.‘ • . • • •
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Steven T. Tamburo, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RiggsNational Corporation (the “registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and proceduresto be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any changes in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s quarter ended March 31,2004, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to
 

 

  the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   Date: April 29, 2004 /S/ STEVEN T. TAMBURO
REF ID:A67235 

'ml JOIIT OBIEIS OF S'.l'.AD • 

Waehington,25, D.O. 

Director, CommuntcatioD.BElectron.ic• 

SJClllf" 

DCJJM-92 

30 Augwlt 1950 

JllMOiAIDUM l'Oll: Director, Arme4 Jorce• Securi '7 .Agen.c;y 

Sub.1ec1;: Britt•h-U.S. CoDterence on. Exchange of 

CrJptograph!c Principle• on a Beciprocal Baaia 

llefera:acei Director AISA mmo Serial 00434 of 28 Aug 50 

1. BJ the abcwe reteren.ce the Director, Ar.tne4 force• Securit7 Agenay 

invited the Director, Commun1cat1one-llactron.ta• to participate in the 

aubJect conference ae a member of the PleDB17 Co111ittee. fhe Director, 

Ctmmun1cat101111-Electron.1ca, will be pleaaed to part1o1pa.te. 

a. 'l'h.e repreaentatlvea of the Joint Oomnurd.cat1on.a-3lectronS.c• CGlllllittee 

OD Subcommittee• 1A1 am 1B11 ia &B 1Dd1cate4 below& 

Subcemmittae 1A1 

Hgber1 

Comdr. J.O. Concannon, lJSll 

Maj. f.J. Train.or USA 

JCa.1. J.M • .And.er•on., Jr. USA1 

Sq.bpqgntttee 1B1 

Hombar1 

Comdr. G, W. Lt mi USB 

Lt. Col. A.L. lturlm USA 

KaJ. G. I. Parr USAJ 

A1targate1 

Comdr. "I .A.G. Xal~ USll 

KaJ. J .ll. Carpen.tar USA 

Maj • :a.E. Larson USAI' 

41terpato1 

Comdr. J.A.G. ltell7 USB 

Capt. R. B:. Xtla7 UM 

Ma.1. ll.I. Laraon. USAJ' 

B.. M. MaCLELLAJllD 

Major General, USAJ 

Director, Communication.aElectronic• 

- .., ....... --... .L ,... .I~ -

' ~-- , n \ 

If -.... 

_.........,...~,.,,,........,....~,....-~~.....,....,....-----,~~..--................... ~ ........ ~~~~~~~~~~~~\ \' Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-13-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

....... 

~J \...
-

REF ID:A57724 

TOP SfiCRE'f' 

USCIB: 5.7/9 

'fOP SB0RM: = l:J. S. 1!ffJllS ON:OY 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Conduct of Overt CCHINT Liaison. 

Reference: Paragraph 8 of USCIB Directive #12. 

21 July 1954 

1. In order to set the record straight on the 11existing 

arrangements" mentioned. in the reference the enclosed. table of arrangements known to this office is circulated for veriticati0n by each 

member. 

2. It is requested that each member examine the enclosure insofar 

as it applies to his activities, execute the statement on the table 

indicating corrections if and as appropriate and return it to this 

office by 30 July 1954. 

3. Upon completion of this exercise the Secretariat will, in the 

absence of any objection to such action, issue a corrected table tor 

the information and file of all members. 

4. THIS DOCUMENT AND ITS ENCLOSURE CONTAIN CCIOOJNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION AND SHALL BE HANDLID aiLY IN CHANNELS EXPRESSLY 

PROVIDED FOR CClUNT. 

Enclosure 

a/s 

USCIB: 5. 7/9 

TOP SECRET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-24-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

24 
- REF ·rn:AS7724 

TO? SECREJ' • 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

'l'OP SEGHl!l'i' 

TABLE OF CCMINT CONTACTS OF USCIB MEMBERS 

ARMY NAVY USAF C'IA STATE FBI NSA DEF 

x x// 

-- x x 

x /i x 

x x x x x 

-- x •//x 

x // x 

__ , 

x // x 

.· 

x 

/ 

// x x x . 

x x x x x 

// x 

/ ./' / ,/ / / I./' /"""' 

-- x 

x 

x 

x 

x 

x, x x x 

x x x 

x x x x 

~ /' / / ,/" / / /,,, 

x 

x 

··-

The above table (does) (does not) correctly reflect all overt CCMINT 

liaison involving dissemination currently effective between 

___________ _.. ____ and Foreign Governmental Activities. 

(Name of Department or Agency) 

(Necessary corrections have been indicated). 

( sifiiat,u;;-0r 'Usc:rB i"remb;~ or his :ig;n't) 

1'HIS DOOCJ1Vi.EN1 caqTnHS Oa:«mr.EeA'f!ONS !M!lrmmEN6J!i ±NFORM:A:'l'IQ!J .. -ym SH..U:b 

TOP SECRET
# CE2004084EN.01026001.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/260 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/260

---

(2004/C 84 E/0307)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3897/03

by Chris Davies (ELDR) to the Commission

(17 December 2003)

Subject:   Unsustainable fishery by-catches

Subject:

Have proposals for a requirement for fishing fleets across the world to make use of the latest by-catch exclusion technology been put to the UN Committee on Fisheries (COFI) by EU Member States? What, if any, coordination took place between Member States prior to making such submissions?

What role will the Commission play in coordinating proposals by EU Member States to the next meeting of the UN Committee on Fisheries (COFI) for the use by fishing fleets across the world of by-catch exclusion technology?

What will be the timetable for the submission and coordination of such proposals?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(6 February 2004)

(6 February 2004)

According to information available to the Commission, no Member State has made any approach in connection with utilisation of by-catch exclusion technology by fleets worldwide to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) in preparation for the next COFI Session in 2005.

This is in any case a matter where authority to act belongs to the Community alone and any approach would have to be made by the Commission following definition of a Community line of action with the Council.

As we have already indicated in our reply to the Honourable Member's Written Question No 3359/03 (1), although the subject definitely merits attention the resources at present available to the Commission are such that it is unlikely, given the CFP priorities already set for 2004, that such an initiative could be mounted. For the Commission to be able to ask for a proposal to be put on the agenda for the next COFI it would have to be prepared before this summer along with all the technical and financial background information needed to make FAO acceptance likely.

1

---

(1)  See page 59.

1

---
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 10-51175 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ISMAEL LEONARDO-DOROTEO, also known as Ismael Leonardo, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:10-CR-2221-1

Before GARZA, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ismael Leonardo-Doroteo (Leonardo) pleaded guilty to one count of illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 and was sentenced to a 46-month term of imprisonment, the lowest sentence i n th e a p p l i c ab l e sentencing guidelines range of 46 to 57 months. He argues on appeal that his sentence is greater than necessary to satisfy the sentencing goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). When, as here, the district court has imposed a sentence within a properly calculated guidelines range, the sent e n c e is entitled to a presumption of U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Sep tem ber 1 4, 2 011 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-51175 Document: 00511602143 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/14/2011No. 10-51175

reasonableness. United States v. Alonzo , 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir. 2006). Review is for abuse of discretion. Gall v. Unit e d S t a t es , 552 U.S. 38, 51-52 (2007). W e h av e c onsidered and rejected Leonardo ’ s a r gu m e nt th a t th e S e n t e n c i n g Guidelines overstate the seriousness of his offense by using a prior conviction to increase both his offense level and his criminal history score. See, e.g., United States v. Duarte , 569 F.3d 528, 529-31 (5th Cir. 2009). His assertion that his illegal reentry was simply an international trespass is likewise unavailing. See, e.g., United States v. Aguirre-Villa , 460 F.3d 681, 683 (5th Cir. 2006). Leonardo properly acknowledges that his challenge to his sentence based on the lack of a “‘fast track’” program in the El Paso Division of the Western District of Texas is foreclosed by circuit precedent. See United States v. Gomez-Herrera , 523 F.3d 554, 562-64 (5th Cir. 2008). He has n o t s h o wn that the sentencing court considered any irrelevant or improper factors or that the court made a “ c lear

error of j u d g m e n t ” in weighing the § 3553(a) factors. United States v. Cooks , 589 F.3d 173, 186 (5th Cir. 2009), cert. den i e d , 130 S. Ct. 1930 (2010). Accordingly, Leonardo has failed to demonstrate that h i s s e n tence is unreasonable. See Alonzo , 435 F.3d at 554. AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 10-51175 Document: 00511602143 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/14/2011
#### JAMES VANN and wife v. THE FAYETTEVILLE BUILDING *&*LOAN ASSOCIATION.

For the Syllabus in this case see that in *Mills and wife and others*v. *The /Salisbury Building & Loan Association,*ante, page 292.

This was a Motion for an *Injunction,*heard before his Honor, Judge Buxton, at Chambers, in the County of CUMBERLAND, July 15th, 1875.

The leading facts in this case are almost identically the same as those in *Mills & Wife and others*v. *1 he Salisbury Building & Loan Association,*ante, page 292, and therefore need not be stated.

On the hearing by his Honor below, he continued the restraining order theretofore granted, from which order, the defendant appealed.

*McRae, Broadfoot*and *Hinsdale,*for appellant.

*W. McL. McKay*and *Guthrie,*contra.

Reade, J.

The questions involved in this case are the same as in *Mills & Wife*v. *Salisbury B. & L. Association,*at this term, *{ante,*page 292); and the decision is the same. And the opinion in that case will be certified in this. In this case the amount of interest stated is 8 per cent., which would govern in this case.

There is no error.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         227,158
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               31,773,240
<ALLOWANCES>                                   609,000
<INVENTORY>                                 29,563,074
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            62,787,580
<PP&E>                                      65,042,738
<DEPRECIATION>                              23,509,732
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             106,358,783
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,112,503
<BONDS>                                     33,494,519
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,313,796
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               106,358,783
<SALES>                                    139,763,956
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           139,763,956
<CGS>                                      116,395,872
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              116,395,872
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,368,121
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,661,927
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,338,036
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,353,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,985,036
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,985,036
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44


</TABLE>
USOIBs 29.l/24 

REF ID : A6.1.L3..0 

SECRET • _,,, ... - .-r ·. 

25 Mq 1954 

MIMCIWJDJJM rOR m1 MIMBERB er nscm: 

Subject: 

lleferenoe: 

ImprC?Vemmtt ot Allied (HA.TO) Comrmmicatione Seaur1 ty. 

USOIB 29.l/l of 21 September 1953. 

l. In :f.mplementation of agreement reached at.' the l03rd ~eting ot 

USCIB on l4 Mq 1954 the to::p.owing named representatives have been ~. 

added~to the Ad Hoc Committee established 'bJ' the reference: 

OGA 

Mr. R. ... v,. Zander - DBF.lmSE 

2. · Attention ot the new comm1 ttee members is invited partioularq 

to paragraph 4 of the reference. 

USCIB: 29.1/24 

SBCRET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 09-29-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

' 

24 

..
#### ANDERSON KIRBY v. M. MASTEN, Sheriff, and others,

The acts and declarations of a vendor, while in possession of the property sold, are competent, both to prove the fact of possession and control, and to qualify the extent and purpose of the possession.

Crvm ACTION, Trover under the former system, tried at Spring Term, 1873, of Foksythe Superior Court, before Cloud, *J.*

The appeal was taken by defendants, for alleged error on the part of his Honor in admitting certain evidence. All the facts necessary to an understanding of the point decided, are stated in the opinion of the Court.

*T. J. Wilson,*Masten, *Scales*<j6 *Scales*and Gray, for ap pellants.

*~M.cCorlde*c6 Bailey, contra.

Rodman, J.

This was an action of trover begun in February, 1868, for the conversion of certain personal property, sold by the defendant Masten, as sheriff, on the 12th of February, 1868, under executions upon Justice’s judgment against Isaac Lester.

The plaintiff claimed under a sale to him bj' Lester of 25th of January, 1868, and a bill of sale of 29th of January, 1868. The defence was that the sale was fraudulent as to the creditors of Lester.

*541The jury, under the charge of the Judge, found a verdict for the defendants.

' The only exceptions are by the plaintiff by reason of the admission of certain evidence.

The evidence objected to and received, was all of the same general character, and the same principle applies to all of it. It consisted of acts and declarations of Lester, after his sale to plaintiff and before the. sale by the sheriff, upon and with respect to the property in question, done and made in the absence of the plaintiff, but while Lester was in the possession and control of the property, with the knowledge and acquiescence of the plaintiff. It is certainly the general law that the acts and declarations of a vendor after the sale, and after he has parted with the possession of property, are not evidence against his Tendee to prove the sale fraudulent.

It is equally clear that possession held by the vendor after the sale, with the consent or acquiesence of the vendee, is evidence more or less strong, according to the circumstances that the sale was fraudulent. Twine’s case, 1 Smith’s L. C. 2 notes.

This being so, it must follow that the acts and declarations of the vendor while in possession, are competent both to prove the fact of possession and control, and to qualify the extent and purpose of the possession. They are part of the *res gestee.*The plaintiff cannot justly complain of this, because having left the vendor in possession, he has left it a question whether the possession was retained by the vendor for his own benefit or not, which must be determined by the circumstances, of which the acts and declarations of the vendor respecting the property are part.

We concur with the Judge that the evidence was competent.

Pee Cueiam. Judgment affirmed.