alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Willis 

JERRY KENNETH KAIN 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 0951-98-3 PER CURIAM 

 NOVEMBER 17, 1998 

EUNICE P. KAIN 

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF AMHERST COUNTY 

J. Michael Gamble, Judge 

 (William F. Quillian III, on brief), for 

appellant. 

 (Arelia S. Langhorne, on brief), for 

appellee. 

 Jerry Kenneth Kain (husband) appeals the decision of the 

circuit court awarding spousal support to Eunice P. Kain (wife). 

 Husband contends that the trial court erred in (1) awarding wife 

$725 in monthly spousal support; and (2) disbelieving husband's 

testimony as to his income. Upon reviewing the record and briefs 

of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. 

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the decision of the trial court. 

See Rule 5A:27. 

 The record does not contain a transcript of the hearing on 

husband's motion to reduce spousal support. However, the trial 

court ordered both husband's proposed Statement of Facts and 

wife's Objections to Written Statement of Facts be included as a 

part of the record on appeal. 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

 Based upon the record before us, we find no evidence that 

husband preserved any issues for appeal. The decree granting 

husband's motion to reduce spousal support was endorsed by 

husband's counsel under the notation "I Ask For This." No 

objections were noted, and no motions for reconsideration or 

rehearing were filed. The written statement of facts contains no 

indication that the husband made any objection. Therefore, we 

find that husband failed to preserve these issues for appeal. 

See Rule 5A:18; Lee v. Lee, 12 Va. App. 512, 404 S.E.2d 736 

(1991) (en banc) 

 Accordingly, the decision of the circuit court is summarily 

affirmed. 

 Affirmed.
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Michael J. Rockenbach, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EmulexCorporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report in being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.
Date: November 4, 2004   /s/ Michael J. Rockenbach Michael J. RockenbachChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31B
<Jo • -

'fOfp;flfiClifl)f: A6 o 3 lt 

17 December 1954 ~ 2 '1 

USCIB~ 29.19/15 

'i'OP BEG~ 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

l'.tEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: COMINT Relations wit~._ ___ _, 

References : (a) USCIB 29.19/14 dated 13 December 1954. 

(b) USCIB 29.19/13 dated 6 December 1954. 

1. Reference (a) indicates that the enc~osure with reference (b) 

was transmitted to SUSLO, London for delivery to LSIB. This was done; 

however, through inadvertence two amendments suggested by the OSD 

member were not ta.ken into account. 

2. Accordingly, SUSLO was asked not to deliver the message until 

further notice. 

3. Meanwhile the proposed OSD amendments were communicated to 

representatives of member departments and agencies who approved them 

by telephone. 

4. The amended message, a copy of which is enclosed, was forwarded 

to SUSLO, London this date. 

Enclosure 

MSG to SUSLO, London 

dtd 17 Dec 1954 

USCIB: 29.19/15 

eclassified and a 

ptain, Navy 

c ive Secretary, USCIB 

ursuant to E .0. 1352 
.f ' ... 

~360-

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

17 December 1954 17142gz DEC PL 8.6-36/ 50 USC 3605 

TO: SUSLO, LONDON 

USCIB EXECUTIVE SECRETARY SENDS. PLEASE AMEND MSG FOR CHAIRMAN LSIB IN 

WL 901 IN FOLLQWilfG TWO RESPECTS: FIRST, CHANGE INITIAL SENTENCE TO 

READ 11USCIB A.GREF.s WITH I.SIB THAT IW THE MATTER OF COMINT RELATIONS WITH 

___ ..... ITHERE SHOULD BE MAXIMUM COORDINATION BET~ U.S. AND U.K. AND 

THAT FULL DETAIIS OF EACH PARTY'S INTENTIONS AND PiiOGRESS SHOULD BE 

EXCHANGED AT ALL STAGES VIA NORMAL CHANNELS." SECOND: ADD A FINAL 

SENTENCE AT END OF MSG AS FOLLOWS: 11SUCH AGREEMENTS ARE CONSIDERED 

MINIMUM REQUimMENT BEFORE U.S. PROCEEDS WITH FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF 

THIS ARRANGEMENT WIT.Ii I t II PARAGRAPH. WITH ABOVE CHANGES, MSG 

MAY NOW BE DELIVERED TO CHAIRMAN, LSIB. 

Enclosure idth USCIB 29.19/15 dtd 17 Dec 1954. 

TOP SECRET
or r~~ ~ ~'-'~ ,~ 

715 

~~~ ' 

.. ~ -t-.f ~ 

R~~ti-o v~ ~ 

roved for Release b NSA on 04-14-2014 ursuantt E.O. 1352 
--· .. ............. ____ __.:___ -

---- ---~-· 

..... __ _.._ ... ~ 

_._ __ _ ----

---~-

--·----=--

.... ~ 

---

------ -

_____ -:;_ 

-------

--- _____ ::___ ... --= 

..;. 

.. ----- ------

---

----- ~----

·--------

-· -----

-----

·--~- - --- ---· 

--·-=-· 

------ ----... _-= 

-~------ . --· 

·----------- -

-- -----:~-~-::::- : __ _ 
REF ID:A65784 .. SECURITY C CATION (lfan11) 

DISPOSITION FORM 

FILE NO. I SUBJECT 

TO 

Technical Consultant 

Robert o. Ferner 

FROM 

Chief, Securit7 Control 

Division 

DATE COMMENT NO. 1 

26 February- 1952 

Capt Ray- H. Young/261/meJ 

1. This office has been advised that Robert o. Ferner holds an active "Q" clearance originally granted 17 May 1950. 

2. The background investigation will be reviewed to determine whether it 

meets USCIB standards. In the event that Mr. Ferner is to be considered as a 

consultant to this Ag~cy, it is necess&l"J" that we have a personal history, 

statement frcn him so that we 11JA7 have a caaplete record of' him in this office. 

Chief, 

Inclosures - 2 

1. Two PHS's with instruction sheets 

2. Two Fingerprint Cards 

DD 1 ~~~'o 9 6 REPLACES NME FORM 96. 1 ocr "· wHrcH MAY sE uSEo. 16-84801-3 "'l:r U. II. COYEltHMEMT PRINTING OFPICE
Exhibit 99.3



Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of QIAGEN N.V. (the
Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: March 31, 2003 |  | /s/    METIN
COLPAN  
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------
|                      |  |                      
|                      |  |                      
|                     
|Dated: March 31, 2003 |  | /s/    PEER M.
SCHATZ
|                      |  |                      
|                      |  |                      



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NRO satellite successfully launched aboard 

Atlas V 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release #1-07

CONTACT: (703) 808-5050 Jun. 15, 2007

A National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) payload was successfully launched aboard a United 

Launch Alliance (ULA) Atlas V Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) from Space 

Launch Complex 41, Cape Canaveral, Florida, on June 15, 2007 at 11:12 a.m. EDT. This is the 

first Atlas V launch of an NRO payload.

"Today's launch is a tribute to the hard work of a dedicated government and industry team. We 

have now had two successful launches using the new EELV launch vehicles," said Col James 

Norman, Director of the NRO Office of Space Launch and NRO Mission Director. Col Norman's 

comments were in reference to today's launch of the Atlas V EELV and a June 2006 launch of a 

Delta IV EELV from Vandenberg AFB, California. "Today's success also underscores the 

importance to our country's National Security Space enterprise of having and sustaining a 

reliable and experienced launch capability for these critical missions," said Col Norman.

The NRO develops and operates unique and innovative overhead reconnaissance systems and 

conducts intelligence-related activities essential for U.S. national security. This launch directly 

supports NRO's goals of being the foundation for global situational awareness and for providing 

intelligence information on timelines responsive to user needs.
Perfluorooctan

Site Related EAssessment Pr3M and DyneoDecatur, Alabama 

Raw Data Appendices: Oc

Quarterly Status Report

GLP10-01-01 INTERIM RGLP10-01-01 INTERIM R

GLP10-01-01 INTERIM REPORT 22GLP10-01-01 INTERIM REPORT 23

Raw Data

Appendices:

October 1, 2011 to

December 31, 2011

Quarterly Status

Report 

11P-0094-v4-1

3M CompanySt. Paul, Minnesota

3M Company

St. Paul, Minnesota

Decatur, Alabama 

3M and Dyneon LLC

Assessment Program

Site Related Environmental 

Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) 

®

®
# CE2004084EN.01010002.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/100 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/100

---

(2004/C 84 E/0136)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3789/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject:   Update on funding for the municipality of Prato the action programme to promote civil protection

Subject:

In reply to my earlier question E-1101/03 (1) asking whether the municipality of Prato had submitted projects and obtained funding under the action programme to promote civil protection, the Commission said on 22 April 2003 that the municipality had not submitted any application.

1

Can the Commission say whether, since that date, any projects have been submitted and what the outcome was?

---

(1)  OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 144.

1

---
I' 

I 

.. u 

REF ID:A58355 

T€h"8EGR£1' 

24 

USCIB: 1.1/3 kPP!Mf>!:f> f>OOUM!NT CONTAINS 

7 April 1954 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

EO 3. 3 I h I I 2 I 

M]MORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: US/JJK/CAN Trinartite Arrangements Concernin~ I I ..._______. 

Reference: USCIB l.l/l dated 10 March 1954. 

1. There having been no objection during the 7-day inter~egnum, 

the r~ference stands approved as of 6 April 1954. 

2. The enclosed action in implementation of the reference is 

circulated for information. 

Enclosure 

CIB #000119 dtd 7 Apr 1954. 

USCIB: 1.1/3 

TO:.a" SECREf' 

kPPEimEB flOe'6I>lm''f eeit'i'J\:'ENS 

COf>!MOIH) Ml\Tmtiltii 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-12-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

I 
TOP SECRET FLARE 

CIB # 000119 

7 April 1954 

TOP SECRET FIJm'E 

MEMORANDUM FOR: SUSLO, ~lJON 

SUSLO, OTTAWA 

Subject: 

Reference: 

VIA: THE DIRECTOR, NSA 

Amendment to Papers Concemin~ !Discussed 

at Tripartite Planning Conference of' MarQh 1953. 

TAB "A" of TRI 53/l 011 (FINAL). 

1. Owing to the fact that Canadian requirements f orl I 

--------...-------'have ~~~e,d since subject Conference, USCI:B 

considers it appropriate that paragraphs2~d. 3 of the reference be 

amended b;y a single .footnote as follows: 

"On 15 May 1954, lSIB, CRCa.n,cit.JSCIBrecoiiiized that 

d 1 peace~~e requirements forl I 

Intelligence bearing codewords had increased 

s sequent to the Tripartite Conference of March 195). 

lSIB, CRC and USCIB therefore agreed that such codeword 

materials as are required by any- of the three parties 

should be requested. under the regular procedu:res already 

established for requesting all other types of COMINT 

codeword material. Portions of paragraphs 2 and 3 which 

conflict with this footnote are superseded hereby." 

~L 86-36/50 USC 3605 

EO 3. 3 I h I I 2 I 

2. Please present the above to the Board to which you are 

accredited with a request for approval in time for the 15 May date 

to have reasonable validity. 

Copy to: 

Director, NSA 

SUKLO 

CBSLO 

(Signed) 

RUFUS L. TAYLOR 

Captain, U. S. Navy 

Executive Secretary, USCIB 

Enclosure with USCIB 1.1/3 dtd 7 Apr 1954. 

TOP SECRET FLARE
# CE2004084EN.01013901.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/139 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/139

---

(2004/C 84 E/0177)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-4037/03

by Hiltrud Breyer (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(12 January 2004)

Subject:   Health reform and natural remedies in Germany

Subject:

As part of its health reforms, Germany has changed the law and made competition between conventional pharmaceutical medicines and natural remedies virtually impossible. Although experts have been working on a positive list of medicinal products including herbal, homeopathic and anthroposophic remedies for years, the German Government's so-called health reform has now removed the possibility of reimbursement for natural medicines through health insurance schemes. Thanks to the health reform, a distortion in competition has emerged that benefits pharmaceutical products. Many patients use natural treatments and remedies, which produce better results in many cases than conventional treatment. These successes should not be brought to an end by market competition between pharmaceutical and natural products favouring the former. As well as the prospect of worse treatment for patients opting for natural medicine, small manufacturers of natural remedies in particular are threatened with bankruptcy.

How does the Commission view this situation from the point of view of competition law?

Answer given by Mr Monti on behalf of the Commission

(10 February 2004)

(10 February 2004)

It is established case law of the European Courts that Community law does not detract from the powers of Member States to organise their social security systems and to adopt, in particular, provisions intended to govern the consumption of pharmaceutical preparations in order to promote the financial stability of their health-care insurance schemes (1). Based on the description given by the Honourable Member, the Commission does not have reason to believe that the legal provisions adopted by the German legislator with the object of refusing insured persons the right to be supplied with prescription-free medicinal preparations at the expense of the statutory sickness funds would infringe European competition law.

1

---

(1)  See for example Judgment of the Court of 7 February 1984 in Case 238/82 Duphar BV and others v. The Netherlands State [1984] European Court Reports 1984 page 523.

1

---
Faulk, Scott (OSn 

Subject: DOT -OST -1995-361 

From: prvs=708e9d125=Scott.Faulk@dot.gov 

[mailto:prvs=708e9d125=Scott.Faulk@dot.gov] On Behalf Of Scott.Faulk@dot.gov 

Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 12:50 PM 

To: wpcommission@mwpower.net; Dennis.DeVany@dot.gov 

Cc: kbrown@mwpower.net 

Subject: RE: EAS and James Adams 

Patrice, 

Thank you for your email. Your request is approved and the new due date for objections will be January 23rd. 

Kind regards, 

Scott 

From: Patrice Lytle [wpcommission@mwpower.net] 

Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 2:04 PM 

To: Faulk, Scott (OST) 

Cc: kbrown@mwpower.net 

Subject: RE: EAS and James Adams 

Scott, 

I appreciate you checking into this for us. In reading your previous email., the notice went to Ely Jet Center. This business 

is not part of White Pine County at all. It is a private business. Mr. Adams is not the chairman of the White Pine County 

Airport Advisory Board. I would appreciate it if all correspondence that was sent to him be copied to the County here at 

this email. Mr. Adams has not been given authority by the County to make decisions or communicate on their behalf, 

and if he has received any information, he has not passed that on to the County Commission or the Airport Manager. 

Also, the Airport Advisory Board is just that an advisory board. They do not have the authority to make decisions for the 

County, that responsibility is with the Board of County Commission. Mr. Adams has not communicated with myself as 

the Acting Airport Manager either. 

Knowing now that the County was not properly noticed, I hereby ask that an extension be granted for another 20 days in 

order for White Pine County to respond to the order to show cause proposing termination of Essential Air Service 

Eligibility dated December 14, 2012, Docket DOT-OST-1995-361. I would appreciate that in the future all correspondence 

regarding the White Pine County Airport be sent to White Pine County at this email or the mailing address of 953 

Campton Street, Ely, NV 89301 or the Ely Airport at P.O. Box 150631, Ely, NV 89315. 

Patrice Lytle 

Department Manager 

White Pine County Commission 

and Acting Airport Manager 

775-293-6562 

wpcommission@mwpower.net<mailto:wpcommission@mwpower.net> 

1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001015551
<NAME>                        Sprint Spectrum L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000,000


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                         16
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  397
<ALLOWANCES>                                   36
<INVENTORY>                                    310
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               883
<PP&E>                                         6,243
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,447
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,863
<BONDS>                                        7,960
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,882)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,030
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,138
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             536
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,965)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,965)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (33)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,998)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
# CE2004084EN.01040601.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/406 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/406

---

(2004/C 84 E/0472)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0459/04

by Armando Cossutta (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(23 February 2004)

Subject:   Closure of Thyssen Krupp plants in Terni

Subject:

The company Thyssen Krupp (TK) has announced the imminent closure of the magnetic steel production plant at the company's Ast factory in Terni, Italy. The closure of the plant will lead to the loss of 900 jobs, with ramifications in terms of employment for Terni's entire steelworking sector. In recent years, TK has received European funding, including funding from the European Social Fund (ESF), granted to finance staff training and infrastructure development at the Terni plant.

| 1. | What urgent measures does the Commission intend to take to avert the closure of the magnetic steel production plant at Thyssen Krupp's factory in Terni? |
| --- | --- |

1.

What urgent measures does the Commission intend to take to avert the closure of the magnetic steel production plant at Thyssen Krupp's factory in Terni?

| 2. | What guarantees of employment are businesses that receive European funding, from the European Social Fund for example, requested to provide in terms of the training of their own staff and the improvement of company infrastructure? |
| --- | --- |

2.

What guarantees of employment are businesses that receive European funding, from the European Social Fund for example, requested to provide in terms of the training of their own staff and the improvement of company infrastructure?

Answer given by Mr Dimas on behalf of the Commission

(31 March 2004)

(31 March 2004)

The Commission would refer the Honourable Members to its answer to Written Questions P-0376/04 by Mrs Sbarbati, P-0388/04 by Mrs Angelilli and P-0445/04 by Mr Mastella (1). In any case, the Commission notes with satisfaction that an agreement appears to have been reached not to close down the installations.

1

---

(1)  See page 206.

1

---