alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004088EN.01054601.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/546 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/546

---

(2004/C 88 E/0556)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0874/04

by Salvador Garriga Polledo (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(22 March 2004)

Subject:   Boycott of polio vaccinations by Nigerian fundamentalists

Subject:

According to the President of Unicef, cases of polio have been recorded in as many as seven countries in the past year through the fault of the Islamic authorities in northern Nigeria.

The Islamic authorities have suspended vaccination campaigns because they claim the preparations have been found to contain oestrogen, a hormone that forms the basis of the contraceptive pill.

Can the Commission indicate whether, in line with the coercive measures at its disposal, it could try to persuade the Islamic authorities in question to end their boycott, thereby ensuring that no more children become paralysed owing to their vaccinations being deferred on the basis of unfounded rumours?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(30 April 2004)

(30 April 2004)

With Nigeria continuing to have among the highest number of polio cases in the world, it is a priority country in terms of global polio eradication. The Community contributes to the Global Polio Eradication Initiative through various instruments as well as specifically allocating supplementary funds for polio immunisation activities in Nigeria. The Commission is in the process of further allocating funds to fight polio in that region.

The Commission, through its delegation in Nigeria, works in dialogue with the Nigerian authorities and will continue to support and improve polio eradication programmes in the region. The Commission is aware that the recent outbreak of polio in northern Nigeria that has spread to other African nations is causing a major setback for the international polio-eradication campaign co-ordinated by the global partnership to eradicate polio. It is to be noted that President Obasanjo is committed to eradicating the polio virus in Nigeria before the global target date of 2005. Despite this there is evidence of suspended vaccination campaigns in Northern Nigeria enabling the virus to spread. To the Commission's knowledge, this position occurs in Nigeria only and it would expect that successful implementation of vaccination programmes in the region as a whole will convince the authorities of the importance of resuming the programmes. In fact the Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC), at its last summit in October 2003 in Malaysia, adopted a resolution to eradicate polio from all its Member States. Currently, 52 of the OIC's 57 members are polio free.

The World Health Organisation and the global partnership to eradicate polio, as the implementing bodies, work with specific technical questions such as the possibility of presence of oestrogen in vaccines.

---
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 p-1,4, 1 ","1011itti 

System 

Securi+—: Incidents 

INNERiBrirMi 

Its04 (3,7 

MEMORANDUM FOR COLONEL WORTHMAN 

SUBJECT: Security Incident 

On 16 January I was called by a Colonel Van Husen, JCS Arms 

Control, who wanted to arrange for a Captain Andrew Valentine to 

attend a meeting between Ambassador Goldberg and Senator Fulbrite. 

Van Husen explained that Goldberg and Fulbrite were to discuss the 

Outer Space Treaty on the morning of 17 January - that Goldberg had 

been briefed on space/ MOL - that Valentine had been with Goldberg 

during the Treaty negotiations - that Valentine needed the same 

briefings, especially on MOL, that Ambassador Goldberg had been 

given, so that he could attend the Goldberg/Fulbrite discussions. 

I advised Van Husen that our office was not participating (and 

had not been asked to participate) in any meetings between Goldberg 

and Fulbrite and that, so far as I was aware, no programs of 

interest to this office were on their agenda. 

Col Van Husen said that he had been directed to our office by 

Colonel Richard Dinnen, SAFSL, who told him that "General Stewarts 

office controlled clearances for all MOL briefings". 

Aside from the pros and cons of briefing or not briefing Valentine, 

I recommend that Col. Dinnen be advised (reminded) that the association 

of MOL (SAFSL) and SAFSS should not be advertized to uncleared 

personnel - particularly (1) that MOL requires a special type clearance 

and (2) that "General Stewart's office" controls the issuance of such 

clearances. 

RICHARD S. QUIGGINS 

Colonel, USAF 

P. S. A check of our records indicate that Van Husen and Valentine 

posesses no NRO clearances. 

v!a BYEMAN gaff 

System
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Doc ID: 2770449
Mlcrotoft BuQineu Solutlont 

One Lone Tree Road 

Fargo, ND 58104-3911 

www. mlcrosofi.com/Busines sSolution s 

Tel 701-281-6500 

MS Fax 425-936-7329 

S10-101005-049 

September 23,2010 

Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary of Transportation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington. DC 20590 

RE: Small Community Air Service Development Grant 

DearMr, LaHoodi 

n 

ro 

_'^S 

Q O : 

m^t" n 

GO 

XD 

As one of the larger private sector employers In the region, the Microsoft Campus in Fargo is very 

supportive of expanded air service for our community. Microsoft is ortremely supportive of the Small 

Community Air Service Development Program Grant which will allow American Airlines/American Eagle 

the opportunity to Implement non-stop service between Fargo's Hector International Airport (FAR) and 

Dallas/Fort Worth (DFW). 

As a truly global company, Microsoft could certainly leverage the 97 markets served by American and 

American Eagle from DFW. This added connection via Dallas/Fort Worth will allow us to operate more . 

efficiently in a competitive global environment. In addition, Microsoft has a significant presence at our 

Los Colinas location and lot of synergy with the Fargo campus. 

Microsoft and American Airlines have developed deep partnerships through the years, and we fully 

appreciate the great service American provides as a global preferred travel vendor. A Dallas/Fargo 

connection would certainty enhance the partnership. 

Service to Dallas/Forth Worth will be a valuable contribution to local air service, and we fully support the 

addition of American Eagle non-stop service between Dallas/Fort Worth and Fargo. 

Sincerely, 

^0'^ r 

Don Morton 

Site Leader, Microsoft Campus in Fargo 

cc: Gary Foss, AMR Regional Network 

Microsoft Corporation is an Equal Opportunity Employer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.2



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 333-04715, 033-98902, and 333-07681) on Form S-3 and (No. 333-04320 and
333-11219) on Form S-8 of AccuMed International, Inc. of our report, which
includes an explanatory paragraph related to substantial doubt about the
ability of Alamar Biosciences, Inc. to continue as a going concern, dated
November 19, 1995, on our audits of the financial statements of Alamar
Biosciences, Inc. as of September 30, 1995 and 1994, and for the years ended
September 30, 1995, 1994 and 1993, which report is included in the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 1995.



                                              /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.



Sacramento, CA
April 4, 1997
• REF ID :A27~6 

...... 

April 10th, 19.44· 

Dear Friedman: 

I wish to thank: you so very much for al.l you have 

done for us during the conference. Everyone has expressed to 

me their appreciation of the way in which the conference was 

run. We are all extremely pleased with our stay in Washington 

and if we can carry out the recommendations, I feel sure it 

is going to be a means of shortening the war and the saving of 

many valuable lives. 

It was most fitting that you should receive your 

decoration during our stay, although I Rish it had been just a 

couple of days earlier. Anyway we all reel that no decoration 

has been more JUStly earned. 

I'm off to Montreal tomorrow night and hope to 

be back in B.P. on Friday. New York has been most refreshing 

and enJoyable. 

My kindest regards to l.U-s. Fried.man. 

Mr. w. F. Friedman, 

Director of Research, 

S.S.A., Arlington Hall, Va. 

Yours very sincerely, 

~~ ' - ' 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 05-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1249/2006

of 18 August 2006         

fixing the complementary quantity of raw cane-sugar originating in the ACP States and India for supply to refineries in the period from 1 July 2006 to 30 September 2007         

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 29(4) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the period from 1 July 2006 to 30 September 2007, the complementary quantity of raw cane-sugar for refining falling within CN code 1701 11 10, as referred to in Article 29(4) of Regulation (EC) No 318/2006, shall be:

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 August 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 178, 1.7.2006, p. 1.

----
Exhibit 4.11
 
 AMENDING AGREEMENT made the 1 s t day of April , 2016 ( " Amending Agreement ")
 
 
  
 ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.,
 
 
 hereinafter the "Corporation "
 
  
   hereinafter the " Executive "
 
 
 WHEREAS the Corporation and the Executive are parties to an Executive Employment Contract dated effective as of January 29 , 2013 (the " Contract " ) ;
 
 AND WHEREAS the Corporation and the Executive wish to amend the Contract as hereinafter set forth .
 
 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained , and for other good and valuable consideration , the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby expressly acknowledged , the Corporation and the Executive hereby agree as follows:
 
 1.
The Contract is hereby amended by:
 
 (a)
deleting the period (.) at the end of paragraph (iii) of subsection 11(a) of the Contract and substituting in its place the following:
 
 "; or
 
 (iv) the business or businesses of the Corporation, for which Executive ' s services are principally performed , are disposed of by the Corporation pursuant to a partial or complete liquidation , dissolution , consolidation or merger of the Corporation, or a sale or transfer of all or a significant portion of the Corporation ' s assets. " ; and
   
 
 
 
 (b)
deleting the words"within two (2) years after a Change in Control, the purchaser" where they appear in paragraph (v) of subsection l l (c) of the Contract and substituting in their place the words "or  transferred, the purchaser or transferee'',so that paragraph (v) of subsection1l(c) of the Contract shall read as follows:
 
 '(v) the failure of the Corporation to obtain a satisfactory agreement from any successor to assume and agree to perform this Agreement or , if the business of the Corporation for which the Executive's services are principally performed is sold or transferred, the purchaser or transferee of such business shall fail to agree to provide the Executive with the same or a comparable position, duties, salary and benefits as provided to the Executive by the Corporation immediately prior to the Change in Control.'
 
 
 2.
The Contract,  except  as amended  by this Amending  Agreement,is hereby confirmed and ratified.
 
 
 IN WITNESS  WHEREOF
AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS 

# TEMPORARY REVISION 2B−2187 

# C

Jun 22/11 TR# 2B−2187 Airworthiness Requirements Part 2 of Maintenance Requirements Manual Appendix B − Airworthiness Limitations Page 1 of 1 The contents of this Temporary Revision have been approved by the Chief, Engineering (or designate), National Aircraft Certification Branch, Transport Canada Civil Aviation Date May 26, 2011 Signed Remy Knoerr


### FILING INSTRUCTIONS: Insert this Temporary Revision (TR) 2B−2187 facing page 2B−41, in Part 2 of the Maintenance Requirements Manual (MRM). Record the incorporation of this Temporary Revision on the RECORD OF TEMPORARY REVISIONS sheet at the front of the MRM Part 2. Keep this Temporary Revison until normal revision service incorporates this information into the Maintenance Requirements Manual. DESCRIPTION: This Temporary Revision is issued to remove the Detailed Visual INSPECTION TYPE from AWL NUMBER 53−61−153. An improved NDI procedure will be introduced to the NDTM that is capable of detecting scribe line type damage.

STRUCTURAL AIRWORTHINESS LIMITATIONS

NDT INSPECTION INTERVAL AWL NUMBER MRB TASK REFERENCE NDT MANUAL DESCRIPTION INSPECT TYPE 51000 lb MTOW 53000 lb MTOW NUMBER REFERENCE REF. SC O TYPE THRESHOLD (LANDINGS) REPEAT (LANDINGS) THRESHOLD (LANDINGS) REPEAT (LANDINGS) 53−61−153 53−61−22−02 53−61−153 Part 4 53−61−153 Part 6 Rear pressure bulkhead web forward face EFFECTIVITY: Pre Modsum TC601R16159 or Pre Modsum TC601R16430 NOTE: Subject to TC AD action. Special Detailed 12000 4360 12000 4360
MOTION DOCKET

97-1474.

#### State v. Sheppard.

Hamilton App. Nos. C-950402 and C-950744. Upon consideration of the motion filed by counsel for appellant to stay execution in the above-styled cause pending the exhaustion of state post-conviction remedies, and it appearing from the exhibits to the motion that a petition for post-conviction relief is pending in this court under case No. 99-893,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion be, and the same is hereby, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that execution of sentence be, and the same is hereby, stayed pending the exhaustion of all proceedings for post-conviction relief before courts of this state, including any appeals.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the appellant and for the appellee shall notify this court when all proceedings for post-conviction relief before e'ourts of this state have been exhausted.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-31203

Conference Calendar

 

MARK JOHNSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ALLEN J. BERGERON,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-1768

- - - - - - - - - -

June 27, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Mark Johnson, #106858, moves this court for in forma

pauperis (IFP) status to appeal the district court's order

dismissing his civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For

the same reasons that the district court stated in its opinion,

we find this appeal to be frivolous. See Johnson v. Bergeron,

No. 95-1768-A-1 (M.D. La. Oct. 6, 1995). Because Johnson fails

to state a nonfrivolous issue on appeal, his motion for leave to
No. 95-31203

- 2 -

proceed IFP is DENIED. Because the appeal is frivolous, it is

DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
0 13s2e 

IN3CoM. ) 

,..., . !Jelv..-i~r v'A 

J
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1756 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1756

     To help small businesses take advantage of energy efficiency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 14, 2015

Mrs. Shaheen (for herself and Mr. Coons) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business 
                          and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To help small businesses take advantage of energy efficiency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Energy Efficiency Act 
of 2015''.

SEC. 2. ENERGY EFFICIENCY.

    Section 501(d)(3) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 
U.S.C. 695(d)(3)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (K), by striking ``producers, or'' and 
        inserting ``producers,'';
            (2) in subparagraph (L), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``, or''; and
            (3) by inserting after subparagraph (L) the following:
                    ``(M) enhanced ability for small business concerns 
                to achieve savings through energy efficiency.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  
                                                               Exhibit 23.2     
                          
                       INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT     
   
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Amendment No. 2 to
Registration Statement No. 333-66947 of Summit Technology, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form S-4 of our report dated March 17, 1999 (which expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to a change in
accounting principle described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements), appearing in the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March
23, 1999 and to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in the
Prospectus, which is part of this Registration Statement.     
   
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP     
   
Boston, Massachusetts     
   
March 23, 1999
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Jay A. Herman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Delphax TechnologiesInc. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:
(1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedDecember 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (theReport), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) the information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.   Date February 13, 2004 /s/ Jay A. Herman    Jay A. Herman  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                              AURUM SOFTWARE, INC.

       COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE AND PRO FORMA NET LOSS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        YEARS ENDED DECEMBER
                                                                31,
                                                       ------------------------
                                                        1994     1995     1996
                                                       -------  -------  ------
<S>                                                    <C>      <C>      <C>
HISTORICAL:
Net loss.............................................. $(4,388) $(4,452) $  279
                                                       =======  =======  ======
Weighted average common shares outstanding............     855    1,937   4,292
Common stock equivalents relating to options and
 preferred stock......................................                    4,790
Common stock and common stock options issued during
 the
 12-month period prior to the initial public offering
 in accordance
 with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 83 (using the
 treasury stock method)...............................   1,155    1,155     866
                                                       -------  -------  ------
                                                         2,010    3,092   9,948
                                                       =======  =======  ======
Net loss per share(1)................................. $ (2.18) $ (1.44) $ 0.03
                                                       =======  =======  ======
PRO FORMA:
Net loss..............................................          $(4,452)
                                                                =======
Historical weighted average shares outstanding........            3,092
Effect of assumed conversion of preferred stock.......            3,620
                                                                -------
                                                                  6,712
                                                                =======
Pro forma net loss per share(1).......................          $ (0.66)
                                                                =======
</TABLE>
--------
(1) Primary and fully diluted loss per share are the same for all periods
    presented.
EXHIBIT 21


                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                        ------------------------------



                                   State or
                                   Other Jurisdiction             Percentage
Name of Subsidiary                 of Incorporation               Ownership
------------------                 ------------------             ----------

Broadcast International, Inc.      Utah

   BI Purchasing, Inc.             Utah

   CheckRite International, Inc.   Utah
      CheckRite, Ltd.              Colorado
         CheckRite of
           California, Inc.        California
         CheckRite of Kansas City,
           Inc.                    Kansas
         CheckRite of Minnesota,
           Inc.                    Minnesota
         CheckRite of Oregon,
           Inc.                    Oregon
         Lone Star CheckRite,
           Inc.                    Texas
         Market Information
           Corporation             Utah

DBC Securities, Inc.               New York

Data Broadcasting Corporation
  (B.V.I.)                         British Virgin Islands

   New T&T DBC Ltd.                Hong Kong                        49.00

Shark Holdings, Inc.               Delaware

Federal News Service, Inc.         Delaware

Las Vegas Sports Consultants,
  Inc.                             Nevada

Instant Odds Network, Inc.         Nevada

Lawyers Communications
  Network, LLC                     Delaware                         50.00

MarketWatch.com, Inc.              Delaware                         32.70

GTIS Corporation                   Delaware

GTIS Europe Limited                England and Wales

eSignal.com, Inc.                  Delaware


NOTE:  All of the subsidiaries listed above are wholly-owned, unless otherwise
noted.