alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
Doc ID: 6684951
f 

i 

d 

I 

REF ID:A65905 

e 

QONFIOEN!!flAL 

Dr. Jto;art. 3. Cd.rm Cl~n .. ~t or ffatbesat.1.Ca 

.;lli1'fUl'a1\,T or. I1lJN.d.a 

l..rbana, IlUNia 

Dear Dr. caimaa 

• 

It 1 I 'lt 

~'°~..J-... ...._L 

The next SCAG Conference, originally scheduled tor S through 1 

Karc.h 19$2~ will be held instead on 12 and l) March l9S:2 ~ 

A copy o£ the Agenda J.S enclosed. Please note that the opening 

session will be held in the Pentagon~ at the time and. place indicated 

on the Agenda.o 

A copy ot a recent letter from Dr o Tompkins is also enclosed,, 

tor your inf ormationo 

.... Jotm n. i1ovue 

Mr., J«in Cloud MOPtl_.._ 

CONFIDENTIAL 

eclassifi ed and a roved for release b NSA on 09-12-2014 ursuantto E ,0, 1352
e 

DISPOSITION FORM 

SECURITY -IFICATION (I/an11) 

FILE NO. I SUBJECT 

TO 

Badge Pictures 

FROM DATE COMMENT NO. 1 

C onsu.Jra.nt Security Control 15 January 1952 

ATTN: V.ir. Friedman Division Capt Ray H. Young/261/mel 

1. The following 5CAG personnel will have to have pictures taken before 

badges can be made: 

Dr. H. T. Engstran l'lO, Mr. J. R. Desch 

Dr. c. E. Shannon 

Mr. William Webster 

Mr. Dean Post --==----... \~~ 

2. These pictures may be taken either at AHS or NavSecSta. If they ar~ to 

be taken at AHS contact Capt Keller on Code 147, Ext 437, who will arrange with 

ASA for the pictures to be taken. 

-~~y Col=. Art'~ ery 

Chief, Security Cotl'trol Division 

. .J 

-- Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-28-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

DD 1 f~~M50 9 6 REPLACES NME FORM 96, I OCT "8, WHICH MAY BE USED. 16-MSOl-3 * U S GOVEllNNENT PRINTING OFFICE
# CE2004084EN.01094601.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/946 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/946

---

(2004/C 84 E/1045)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1107/04

by Dirk Sterckx (ELDR) to the Commission

(5 April 2004)

Subject:   Administrative work involved in preparing a subsidy application

Subject:

It is said that if an organisation wishes to submit a project under the Media Programme TAO — Audiovisual Festivals, it has to spend around EUR 4 000 on preparing its subsidy application. If the application is accepted, the organisation receives barely EUR 10 000.

Is it not regrettable that the cost of submitting a project application amounts to 40 % of the sum which an organisation ultimately receives?

Is there not an urgent need to simplify the preparation of subsidy applications, and ought not the costs to applicants and the administrative costs to the Commission to be reduced in this way?

Has the Commission already taken any steps to achieve this?

Answer given by Mrs Reding on behalf of the Commission

(28 April 2004)

(28 April 2004)

Each Programme managed and implemented by the Commission is subject to the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities. The procedures laid down by the Regulation are aimed at ensuring sound financial management of Community resources. These provisions may impose burdens on beneficiaries in terms of procedures and ultimately in terms of the cost effectiveness of Community support. The mid term evaluation of the MEDIA programmes and the public consultation on the new generation of programmes have confirmed the need to simplify procedures for implementation of the programmes. This will be taken into account in the preparation of the new programme for Community action for the audiovisual industry.

The contributions for festivals are relatively small in order to reach the largest number of beneficiaries possible and the largest audience for European works. The Commission does not accept that the application costs would be EUR 4 000 to receive EUR 10 000 or 40 % of the subsidy received, as the Honourable Member states in his question.

It should be noted that a minimum of 40 % of the cost of a project should be funded by sources other than Community support. The co-financing clause does not have any impact on the costs of the application, but is a requirement established by the financial regulations in the implementation of Community programmes.

---
#### B. Hoffmann Manufacturing Company, Respondent, vs. Western Stove *&*Manufacturing Company, Appellant.

*March 2*

*March 22, 1898.*

*Appeal on questions of fact..*

The decision of the trial court upon questions of fact cannot be disturbed on appeal unless contrary to the clear preponderance of the evidence.

Appeal from an order of the superior court of Milwaukee county: J. C. Ludwig, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

For the appellant there were briefs by Winlder, *Flanders, Smith, Bottum &*Vilas, and oral argument by *J. O. Flanders.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Sylvester, Scheiber, .Riley <& Orth,*and oral argument by *G. A. Orth.*

Marshall, J.

This is an appeal from an order sustaining an attachment. It involves solely the question of whether the trial court decided correctly, from the evidence, on questions of fact. The rule in such cases is that the decision of the trial court - cannot be disturbed unless contrary to the clear preponderance of the evidence. The record has been carefully tested by that rule without discovering any sufficient reason for reversing the action of the trial court. It is not considered advisable to do more than state the conclusion to which we have arrived. The case is governed by a rule so well established that a discussion of it, or of the evidence calling for its application, will be of no value in future litigation.

*By the*Oov/rt.— The order of the superior court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10-KSB
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   10-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-18-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1995
<CASH>                                         148,619
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               148,619
<PP&E>                                         313,180
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,189
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 412,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          287,417
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,000
<COMMON>                                        14,939
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,254
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   412,610
<SALES>                                        611,699
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               611,699
<CGS>                                           79,575
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,575
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               234,825
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                297,299
<INCOME-TAX>                                   119,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            178,299
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   178,299
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
# CE2004084EN.01024501.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/245 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/245

---

(2004/C 84 E/0290)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3526/03

by Jens-Peter Bonde (EDD) to the Council

(20 November 2003)

Subject:   The difference between unanimity and consensus

Subject:

The Convention's draft EU Constitution lays down that, except where the Constitution provides otherwise, decisions of the European Council shall be taken by consensus. (Article 20(4)). Could the Council please state whether a single country can block the taking of a decision by consensus in the European Council, and what the precise definition of a decision taken by consensus is?

Reply

(11 March 2004)

(11 March 2004)

The Council would remind the Honourable Member that it cannot express a view on matters falling within the ambit of the Intergovernmental Conference.

However, as the question also concerns the present treaties and, in particular, the way the European Council works, the following brief reply may be made.

In the present treaties (as in the draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe) only three voting arrangements for adopting an act or a decision requiring a vote by the Council (or the European Council in the draft Treaty establishing a Constitution) are legally defined: simple majority, qualified majority and unanimity.

Consensus is not a voting rule and has no legal definition. It is the way the European Council already agrees on conclusions or other texts of a political nature which are not in the form of an act having binding legal effects on third parties.

In its most usual sense, consensus means that a text is generally acceptable, with no delegation having any formal objection, although some delegations may have reservations on the substance or on certain aspects of the text without standing in the way of a consensus.

The Honourable Member might also like to refer to the outcome of proceedings of the Working Party of Legal Experts of the Intergovernmental Conference (1). The Working Party suggests amending the text drawn up by the Convention so as to specify the applicable voting rule explicitly in all cases where the draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe confers on the European Council the power to adopt binding legal acts.

1

---

(1)  See CIG 50/03 and the report by the Chairman of the Working Party, 51/03, available on the Internet site of the Intergovernmental Conference.

1

---
• 

E 

" 

.. 

" 

J 

,, 

iC 

)1 

) 

• 

Dr. Howard T. En&atrom. 

Vice Pl'Uidmt 

Etginee:d.ng Renarch .Asaociatea 

501 18th St.net,, ~uth 

Arlington,, Vir&iJda 

Dear Dr. ~troai 

REF ID:A72_.QQ1 

... 

Seri.&1: 0578 

Since ~u have bad some cont.act. ldth the symposium. which was held 

at ti. Insti tuta for Nuaeri.ca.1. Analysis this 8WD11ier am which was: 

sponsored by the Armed Force• Security Agency• I think you will be 

interuted 

another year 

in 

and. 

knowing 

to have 

that 

a 

I 

siaUar 

have ded.ded 

aat.heri.ng 

to 

next 

exterri 

sumer. 

t.be ~ 

Your opinion mi camaents will be useful in assi&t:I.ng us in detemining the dine• 

t.ion or the next symposi.Ull. 

I would much appreciate oav.i.Dg your answers or comnenta on the 

.following points havi.JJ6 a de.finite beaang on such a symposiua1 

l) Are tlte objecti vu appropr:i.ate? 

2} Wu the progress tbia sumer in the right cb.~ti.on? 

3) What key peopl~ should be oougbt for next. yaa.r? 

ld Whoa would you .recommend to be chairman .for ne~ 'J8ar? 

S) What further ol>-jecti:n• do you reoomaeni 1 

I realise th.at opporturrl. tr to gain detailed, first-hand knowledge 

of the reoentJ..y-coapleted s;ympoeium am its cotldu.ct has not. been possible for you, oo.t I would appreciate JOur statement& on these queatians, 

however JIK>C1itied or limited they~ be1 since What I w:tsb are the 

opinions of qualified peop1e who did not directJ.y part1. ci.pate in the 

symposia. 

A COP7 of ~. CW'ns con:ti.d.eutJ.al report.,, 1esa the rather bulky 

appealioes• J.s mcl.osed £or ~ur intoraation. I.f 3011 do not wish to 

retain the raport~ please return it.. Ia addi ti.on, i£ you voul.d like 

to see 8Jl1' or all of t.ha. appendices to the report, I will be &lad to 

um th• to you on request. 

I will be inuch indebted. to JOU. ror taking ti.me on this mat.ter. 

Copies furnished: 

AG (3) OOT (1) 

W.F.Friedman/eby/12 Sept 52 

Consultant/60493 

1 lJ2.Cl 

t on SC»P,, dtd 8 Sept. 

Sincerel)" .. 

(9g'8 llaiph ~" t°£!!l!~? 

lWJ>ll J. CAI;INE 

Major O-.nl., US Amy 

DJ.nCtor,, AJ'M4 Forces securi:ty kgency 

eclassified and a roved or release b NS on 02-12-2014 ursuantt E .0. 1352 
,,-

• • 

REF ID:A72051 

H -ffnFJa(hffs~!- •. <;ertalt 0 r::"'?'<J 

- .,.I 

~ FOR RECORDS 

Proteaaor Cairns, Chi~ ot 03 an;l Mr. Frierln\AD. agreed it was useful 

to have ooments frm qualit.led Jnathematie1ans on the SJlllposium, but not 

part1ci}Wlt8 tha1'90t. Comments would be useful 1n gtdd:l»g the next 

sympos1\IL
UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATlbl?(''/l,^jifLy'-1^0^ OFFIC E O F HEARING S • ^•:V^'J:^'>f'^J*n''i^|;, „ 

### WASHINGTON , D.C . ' '-'^'•'^• ^.OkHATIuN S mNO V \ UP 2

- 0 1 FEDERA L AVIATIO NADMINISTRATIO N

Complainan t VS . RUSHMOR E HELICOPTERS , INC. ,

Responden t FA ADocke t No.

- CP10GL000 2 DM S No . FAA-2010-002 3

Entr yo f Appearanc e Pursuan t t o sectio n13.20 ^ and sectio n13.21 1 o f th e Rule s o f Practic e i nFedera l Aviatio nAdministratio n{^'FAA" ) Civi l Penalt yActions , 1 4 C.F.R . § § 13:20 4 and 13.211 , th e undersigne d herebyenter s hi s appearanc e a s representativ e o f th e Administrator : 

# i^^

_ )h nC . Stuart , Jr . Enforcemen t Division , AGC-30 0 Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Tel : {202)267-995 8

Dated : Novembe r 3 , 201 1Certificat e o f Servic e

I herebycertif ythat- I hav e sen t o nthi s dat e b yUnite d State s mail , postag e prepaid , certifie d retur nreceip t requested , a copyo f th e Administrator' s Entr yo f Appearanc e i nFA AV . Rushmor e Helicopters , Inc. , FA ADocke t No. . CP10GL0002 , DM S No . FAA-2010-0023 , addresse d to : Fran k A . Bettmann , Esq . Bettmann , Hogue , & Diedrich , Prof . LL C 150 6 Mountai nVie wRoad , Suit e 10 1 Rapi d City , Sout hDakot a 57702-434 9 I naddition , I herebycertif ytha t I hav e o nthi s dat e place d i nth e Unite d State s mail , postag e prepaid , certifie d retur nreceip t requested , th e origina l addresse d to : Appellat e Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Ave . S W Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W100 0 Washington , D C 2059 1

Dated : Novembe r 3 , 201 1
... -··--~- -• ·- · ::~-;-, , \o1'·r. ~..,..~. _ -..~- ... -~ -. ~ ~ .. "'!"";;·~~£;+ . ·r· , ~"' - .: ~; ...... =::. - : :-. .. -. ...... !; :·•, ~~-- .. •• -..:_~ .'~ 

__ ·:- -_ REF ID:A.66713 .-- - ·--_- -· -.-··: -~:- ·-'-~· ~ 

__ , . -~-)Cf' -.... 1_ - l../t, --·· .... ;_,_ ' - . --~7 T- I ~ , ...... -. ~. ··_ .... -, ... -=--"'"'!:°.-="' ... ~ 

. .., - • . . • -. I ·' ' • "f'"!'::'.•ill . . """ - . - -·. . . . '-:' ... ~~ 

- . '1-... f.L-.-V' • - - - . - -..-:-:•::-

--~, --_.--~--~~_;- _-c:-, .. =-~ · ~'-- ·-~~'-~-~f~ ~ , "' · ---,.,,_i!!LL::i,iji! . .., . p·• ,, .... . . . . . ' ·J~~ 

·---~-\'!111.,:::Y-----==-...::.=-.-~~-------. -1~!E-......... ::.:.J~ulill:lii..1ir..;..a#liC-l~.......::~;..,~:.. • . -. -<¥-"'f 

J-~ . " .__ •, _: . . . . . - -- ,~-· - ~ . . "; ; . . ~ ·. 

- ........ .· :!:""!!!'!' -:·~. --~ , ... · .. ' . . . . ~- ---ti . . = J.!ESI 

. ,h._" ,. ~_:_. ___ . - ~-1 • -:2 ---- --~--

. .·-v---'~~~---_c_- --~. _-!-------:-- : . ::.~ . .} ... ct.;__ / ~- . .. - / ..... _. ·--~.-.-~ 

·-·. ·.--...!.~~ - :--·--------'·- -~~ ,,,,~~-~ . . - // ":" ·- J -=· + - . IJ~- ~ -/. -- ----~ 

, -- • .~. . ·~.?-=..~ I ~-- ,:,... ~ . c 4~~~~.~ 

fP 1' · ~~- ~'~- ""~--~~t· · =J'~-·r· --;1.~t..t. ~~-i;j ( . - l-:\.J:"-~- . " - -·-~ .· 

. 

~ - t:P . • #'.JJ-1!_ 

, L - . - -. ~-~ 

... ,. . 

. L-7·. · ... -- . ~i .. -~ · l_ ~-~~~----~«v - _:·2~---t~i -~ .~-"":" - -- ~:~-:~.::1./!_ ~ .• -... ~ ~'-- w.!=.lr fut, 1:~;: - . -· . . - - . ~..-; ;·~ { . . ·-·~~·.: .... •kf"-:··~---t·~~~-~ . ~k--_--- . . ----·:' . ~ . ~- . 

. I 

-· 

• • I . -· . . ..::___ ···-_: . ----·-------:--:....:--~-----· ~ ............... ~~~~~--F=,,......~--~- ,.... - . ' -· - ~·-- ~~·~·- ·- ........... ~-~-...- --~~---~ 

, - -- _, __ -=-~-- _ =.:;_ ------- ·- ._·_ :·-: --:"---::·~,-- .:-_:·--~-::- ·::;1~-1 

:---_• ==r-r --=·= = • =nzr' ;. -- . -- .J. ~ > 1 • - • -• - .... --. - ..... ,.. .,. • ~ • I ,.--. ... -. rr.• .__,. • ....... ••..Iii,. -~~!:s:~;LEiSl&I! 

. . " . - - .JJ ~ 1// . - n-.=..: ·-· .......... ---. 77-= ~ .r-:-J ';t::_" {~~:L:UI -~} // -. :'~'~ 

. --'-~ ~~~ ~ •'.k.t' (4-. ----.. ~: 0 £Lr- o:~\ ~! ~· • • ' , · .. -·:,•~~ - v;.~"'"F=---- -- ---- " ~ ;::>I •. - - '·Mii· - .• _,.-;.;,.-'7 . ~.. . ~--. • • • ____ ..:~.---.. ! • ' ~: • - • ... ~I _J~_,,·-~'"' •"'• .' • ·:-:.....-:~.;~~· .. ------· --- - ·---:-- - • • L....-......ar-';1 . ~ . - _, . ···~ . ---:··-,.G~j _ ..... -·.-:.·~ 

·~... . - -~~ 

• 1 .
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

              Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of Chittenden Corporation on Form S-3 (File No. 333-  ) of our report dated
January 21, 1997, on our audit of the consolidated financial statements of
Vermont Financial Services Corp. for the year ended December 31, 1996, which
report is included in the 1998 Form 10-K of Vermont Financial Services Corp. We
also consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts".

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
June 11, 1999
# CE2004084EN.01040901.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/409 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/409

---

(2004/C 84 E/0475)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0467/04

by Richard Corbett (PSE) to the Commission

(23 February 2004)

Subject:   Mission expenses

Subject:

What were the mission expenses for (i) Members and (ii) staff of the Commission in respect of their attendance at part-sessions of the European Parliament held in Strasbourg (a) during 2001 and (b) during 2002?

Answer given by Mr Kinnock on behalf of the Commission

(18 March 2004)

(18 March 2004)

The breakdown of mission expenses necessitated by attendance at part-sessions of the European Parliament held in Strasbourg in 2001 and 2002 and by category was as follows:

| (in euro) |
| --- |
| Year | Category | Total |
| Cabinet staff | Other Commission staff | Members |
| 2001 | 209 245,01 | 340 794,65 | 1 089 143,59 | 1 639 183,25 |
| 2002 | 311 144,85 | 355 632,28 | 1 114 182,32 | 1 780 959,45 |

(in euro)

Year

Category

Total

Cabinet staff

Other Commission staff

Members

2001

209 245,01

340 794,65

1 089 143,59

1 639 183,25

2002

311 144,85

355 632,28

1 114 182,32

1 780 959,45

The above expenses relate to measurable and billed costs of transport, accommodation, meals, and other expenditures such as telephone and fax use for work purposes.

---