alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
REF ID:A522609 

3 1~ 1951 

tim~ORANDW~ FOR CHAIRMft.N, u.s.-u.K. CONFERENCE ON THE SFDURITY OF 

FRENCH cmmtJNICATIONS 

SUBJECT: Imm~ia.te Conclusion and Recommendation Presented by the 

Subcommittee on Security 

It is reconunended that, as a matter of urgency, the followine conclusion 

and recommendations which have been reached by the Security Subcommittee be 

approved and implemented: 

CONCLUSION 

Due to (a) the absence of specific information regarding the security of 

the Frencl!_ C!"YPtographic Services and (b) the relevance of this knowledge to -- determinatiOn o.fA • means of a.pproaching the French successfully with regard , 

to their communications security, it is advisable that an immediate, limited 

effort be made to elicit this information in Paris through the ~edium of the 

Tripartite Security Group, nou in London, which has been charged with surveying the general secu:rity of U.S., U.K. &"1d French governnental activitieao 

To this end it vtill be nec~ssary that, prior to discussions in Paris, the U.S. 

and U.K. teams be autho1~ized to discuss this matter with the French in London. 

RECOUl!ENDATIONS 

It is recomr~ended that: 

lo The U.S. and U.K. teams of the Tripartite Security Group be authorized 

to discuss and undertake suitable demonstrations of: 

a. The existence a.n1 nature of special screening procedures for 

cryptop,raphic personnel; and 

b. Special provisions for the physical security of premises on which 

cryptop:raphic activ:i.ties are conducted. 

2. ·rhese discussions and demonstrationa be undertaken immediately in 

London so as to prepare a basis for inqui:L-y in Paris. 

3. Tnese discussions and demonstrations not include: 

a. Physical security procedures for the handliri..g of cryptographic 

materials; or 

b. Any aspects of the security of codes or ciphers or the tra.nsm.issi.on 

of messageso 

Jf)~VJ,-~ WilJSTON H. SCOT1' 

Chairman, 

Subco.runittee on Security 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-03-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-31203 Conference Calendar

MARK JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus ALLEN J. BERGERON, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-1768

- - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Mark Johnson, #106858, moves this court for in forma pauperis (IFP) status to appeal the district court's order dismissing his civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the same reasons that the district court stated in its opinion, we find this appeal to be frivolous. See Johnson v. Bergeron , No. 95-1768-A-1 (M.D. La. Oct. 6, 1995). Because Johnson fails to state a nonfrivolous issue on appeal, his motion for leave toNo. 95-31203 - 2 - proceed IFP is DENIED. Because the appeal is frivolous, it is
DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
# CE2004084EN.01032301.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/323 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/323

---

(2004/C 84 E/0373)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0164/04

by Christopher Heaton-Harris (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(29 January 2004)

Subject:   Commission's accounting systems

Subject:

I understand the Internal Audit Service, in a report entitled ‘IAS Review of the Commission's Accounting Framework — Final Report’ dated 15 April 2003, made a number of recommendations to the Commission regarding the accounting systems.

Has the Commission imposed a high level of quality control over financial data and the accompanying explanatory texts as recommended by the IAS?

Has the terminology used in respect of financial data been simplified as recommended by the ECA?

---
REF ID:A65229 

SECRET 

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

MEMORANDUM. FOR: Executive Secretary, USCIB 

SUBJECT Clearance for Category III COMINT 

REFERENCE USCIB 13.2/10 

I 

-' 

22 APR 1955 

1. Reference document contains the record of the USCIB decision 

that Maj. Gen. Kenneth D. Nichols had a "need-to-know" regarding 

COMINT during his tenure as General Manager of the Atomic Energy 

Commission. 

2. Brig. Gen. Kenneth E. Fields will replace Gen. Nichols in 

the position mentioned within the next. two weeks. It is requested 

that the members of USCIB confirm the 11need-to-know11 of Gen. Fields. 

Thereafter, in the absence of derogatory information which would 

preclude such action, this Agency will undertake the necessary 

indoctrination. 

FOR THE DIRECTION OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE: 

(Sim.ed) 

for 

HUNTINGTON D. SHELDON 

CIA Member, USCIB 

OGA 

Enclosure with USCIB 13.2/58 dtd 25 Apr 1955. 

FORM A7031 SEP 97 

NSN 7540-FM-001-5622 

eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 09-11-2014 pursuant to E.O. 

3526
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 250 (Monday, December 31, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 77047]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-31354]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DoD-2012-OS-0164]

Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Defense Contract Audit Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a Systems of Records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) is deleting a system 
of records in its existing inventory of record systems subject to the 
Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed actions will be effective on January 31, 2013 
unless comments are received which result in a contrary determination. 
Comments will be accepted on or before January 30, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
    * Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
    * Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 4800 Mark Center 
Drive, East Tower, 2nd Floor, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350-3100.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Defense Contract Audit Agency Privacy 
Management Analyst, Information and Records Management Branch, 8725 
John J. Kingman Road, Suite 2135, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6219 or at 
(703) 767-1022.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) 
systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 
552a), as amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are 
available from the address in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    The proposed deletion is not within the purview of subsection (r) 
of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires 
the submission of new or altered systems reports.

    Dated: December 13, 2012.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
RDCAA 367.5

System name
    Employee Assistance Program (EAP) Counseling Records (November 20, 
1997, 62 FR 62003).

Reason
    The Defense Contract Audit Agency contracts our Employee Assistance 
Program (EAP) with the United States Department of Health & Human 
Services (HHS). HHS has a Systems of Records Notice 09-90-0010 that 
covers EAP records. Because EAP records are no longer maintained by the 
Agency, system notice RDCAA 367.5 is not needed and should be deleted.

[FR Doc. 2012-31354 Filed 12-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
*Wednesday, June 16, 1999*

MERIT DOCKET

99-797.

#### State ex rel. Ritter v. Ghee.

In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,741,079
<SECURITIES>                                 6,133,414
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,189,116
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                  8,061,070
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,412,481
<PP&E>                                       3,953,457
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,782,008
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,583,930
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,745,454
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       631,773
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,115,732
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,583,930
<SALES>                                      5,487,892
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,487,892
<CGS>                                        2,071,255
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,461,134
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (98,242)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                125,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            100,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   100,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1
                        Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors
RF Power Products, Inc.:

        We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 33-59414, No. 33-73922 and No. 333-34563) on Form S-8 of RF Power Products,
Inc. of our report dated January 16, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of RF Power Products, Inc. and subsidiary as of November 30, 1997 and
1996, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity,
and cash flows for the years then ended, and related schedule, which report
appears in the November 30, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of RF Power
Products, Inc.

                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 25, 1998
June 6, 2016

Mr. James D. Peters

Unmanned Aircraft Program Design Engineer

Merrill Aviation and Defense

1023 South Wheeler Street

Saginaw, MI 48602

Dear Mr. Peters:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§§ 61.113, 91.119, and 91.151 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains 

why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your February 25, 2016, exemption request on behalf of Merrill Aviation and

Defense into the public docket (No. FAA-2016-4274), but we are unable to process your 

request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of

§ 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of 

the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brandon Roberts

Manager, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Faulk, Scott {OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Aloha, 

Pa'oneakai Lee-Namakaeha <kauikeolani_2004@hotmail.com> 

Wednesday, April 23, 2014 11:02 PM 

EAS (OST) 

In Support of MAKANI KAI for the EAS 

As a resident of Kalaupapa I am STILL in continued support of Makani Kai for the EAS in Kalaupapa! Thank you for your 

consideration! 

Mahala, 

Pa'one 

Sent from my iPhone 

1
REF ID:A72034 

Pro tenor .s te1CVt s. CdJ"DS 

Cbainean, Departaent or K&theaatice 

Uni verei v or Illiao1a 

Urbana, Illinois 

• 

Dear Professor C&irn1 s 

Ssr.1.al. z 

I am bighly ple&ffd to learn that you have c;onsented to serve as 

Cha1rm11n of the aeoom eeminar to be eond uo ted for us at the Insti. tute 

tor Numerical Anal,.a1.s next summer. 

In ordor th.at you ma.1 have graaU,r freedom. for concentration on 

the technicd.l. diroetion of the oominar, as veil &3 more t.1.me to devote 

to your ovn resoarch, I am ask1.nJ Dr. J. u. Curtiss, Chio.! o! the 

Nattcnal .t\pplled Mathematic& Laboratories, to arrsnge to design.at& 

so.ma nerson,, prefarabl7 a member of the INA staff, to aerve ~ Executive Searetary. I inclc:Je a copy of rq letter to him aJX1 v.Ul advise 

you prompt.l.y of the nature or his reply. 

In response t.o your latter of 31 October 1952, Vi tn r~ard t.cl 

t.he adVi.eabillty ot your comi:ig to \11&3h1ngton for three days, on lO, 

ll, and l2 Raveaoer, travel orders for tne journey .ue already on tbs 

va7. Since they llere sent by air mall t iey should certai:tl.J reach 

you b7 1 November. 

I hope you will find time du.r .t.ng this "(isi t to drop in tor a 

few llll.U11tes ctta t vi tn me. 

l lnol 

eow ot l t..r to Dr. £Ftd.a• 

C/S 

Sincerely, 

RALl'H J. c.ANIH& 

Major Genaral, us Arrq 

Direetor, Armed Vorcea seouriv A&enD7 

CCf AG L'? 

OONS 

c 7'1 ,.,.......__t._ +~fie, 7?/D 'Yfll~,_ -~-j 

M/Rt In a telephone conversation with Mr. Friedman, on 31 October 19$2, 

Pro.f ~ Cairns accepted the tender of Chairmanship of the next seminar, 

subject to bis being provided with assistance to take care o! 

administrative details, w.F adman t. 60493/4 Nov $2 

roved for Release b NSA on 02-12-2014 ursuantto E .0. 135
ii 

REF ID:A71813 

COPY 

THE SECRETARY OF C001ERCE 

WASHmlTON 25 

Lieut. General Ralph J. Canine, USA 

Director 1 National Security Agemy 

Washington 2.51 D. c. . 

Dear General Canine:-

23 March 1953 

Your letter of' March 3 requested that the Department 

of' Commerce authorize the temporary appointment by the National 

Bureau of Standards of approximately fifteen mathematicians in 

order to comuct a symposium. thLs coming summer on certain 

problans of interest to the work of your agency. This 

Deparbn.ent will be pleased to cooperate w:Lth you on th:is 

program Biii will make the authorizations necessary to carry 

out the symposium as planned. 

This reply was delayed pending clarification of the 

effect of some impending personnel and administrative changes 

in the Applied Mathematics Division of the National Bureau of 

Standards on the contemplated symposium. As a result or 

discussions between representatives of the National Bureau of 

Stamards, the Office of' Naval Research, and the Departm.ent•s 

Security Control Officer, it was determined that the S'10POsium 

could be carried out within the framework of the impendiDg 

changes. Dr. Franz L. Alt, Acting Chief of the :Blmeau1 s Applied 

Mathematics Division, will have general responsibility for the 

program in the Bureau's Washington office and Dr. C". B. Taapld.ns 

will have immediate responsibility for it at the Los Angeles 

office. 

Sincerely yours, 

C. R. SHEAFFER 

Acting SIJ?cretary of Canmerce 

COPY 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 02-11-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Riggs National
Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Robert L. Allbritton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|    |  |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Robert L. Allbritton
Name: Robert L. Allbritton
Chief Executive Officer
August 9, 2002
EXHIBIT 23.8

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

As independent  auditors, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of
our reports,  dated March 6, 1998 and March 31, 1997 on the  combined  financial
statements of Tele Cable de Morelos,  S.A. de C.V. and related companies (all of
which are  subsidiaries  of  Megapo  Comunicaciones  de  Mexico,  S.A.  de C.V.)
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, into previously filed  Registration
Statement File Nos. 33-81876, 33-87326 and 333-00226.

                                    Galaz, Gomez Morfin, Chavero, Yamazaki, S.C.


Acapulco, Mexico
May 25, 1998
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I In connection with the quarterly report of Science Dynamics  Corporation
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal  quarter ended March 31, 2006 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Joe  Noto,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


May 22, 2006                            /s/ Joe Noto
                                        -------------------------------
                                        Joe Noto
                                        Chief Financial Officer
# CE2004084EN.01021001.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/210 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/210

---

(2004/C 84 E/0254)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0393/04

by Bill Miller (PSE) to the Commission

(12 February 2004)

Subject:   Animal By-Products Regulation

Subject:

The above regulation has recently been implemented within Scotland resulting in numerous interpretations. While no-one is against the spirit of the legislation, its enactment in Scotland is causing concern. Many small, one-person businesses are facing unacceptable levels of charges, which will ultimately force them into bankruptcy.

The reason for my question was to enquire whether the Commission, when drafting this legislation, envisaged a cut-off point where small businesses fell out of the scope of the Regulation, or could that be dealt with at Member State level?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(22 March 2004)

(22 March 2004)

Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the Parliament and of the Council of 3 October 2002 (1), as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 808/2003 of 12 May 2003 (2), lays down health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption. It was adopted on 3 October 2002, published on 10 October 2002 and applied from 1 May 2003.

1

2

The Regulation covers small businesses as far as the collection, transport, storage, handling, processing and use or disposal, importation, export and transit of animal by-products are concerned to prevent these products from presenting a risk to animal or public health. There is no cut-off point foreseen where small businesses would fall out of the scope of the Regulation, and Member States cannot derogate from its provisions.

A fundamental revision of the Community rules applicable to animal by-products was necessary in the light of the recent feed-borne crises (bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), dioxin, foot and mouth disease, etc.) and the wide variety of approaches that existed in Member States as regards the financial support for processing, collection, storage and disposal of animal by-products.

On the basis of Article 35 of the Regulation in relation to national provisions, Member States have been asked to communicate to the Commission the measures taken to ensure compliance with the Regulation, and any difficulties they face. The Commission shall submit, before the end of 2004, a report to the Parliament and the Council accompanied, if appropriate, by legislative proposals taking into account the difficulties raised by Member States.

If, therefore, particular problems have arisen for smaller operators, it would be expected that Member States' responses to Article 35 would put the Commission in a position to recommend responses to those problems by the end of 2004.

---

(1)  OJ L 273, 10.10.2002.

1

(2)  OJ L 117, 13.5.2003.

2

---
<PAGE>


                                                               Exhibit No. 23.01

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 33-71462, 333-05253, 333-15191, 333-61997,
333-33948, 333-59578, and 333-86588) of Occupational Health + Rehabilitation Inc
of our report dated March 7, 2003, except for Notes 4 and 10 as to which the
date is March 24, 2003, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which
appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation
by reference of our report dated March 7, 2003 relating to the financial
statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 28, 2003