alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Timothy C. Clayton, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of HEI, Inc.;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;
4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c)  Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.    /s/ Timothy C. Clayton   Timothy C. Clayton
-. 

• 

S9:NFIBBN'i'IAI:i = l:J. 5. mEB 6MLY 

SUBJECT NUMBER 

USCIB: 5.3/55 

Subject: 

Item 1 of the Agenda for the 19th Meeting of USCIBEC, 

held on 21 September 1954. 

Approval of Final Minutes of the 17th Meeting. 

The CHAIRMAN asked if there were any objections to the subject 

minutes. 

There were no objections. 

DECISION: (21 September 1954) USCIBEC approved the Final Minutes of 

the 17th Meeting ~s written. 

USCIB: 5.3/55 - 3 -

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-26-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

C01VFIDE1VTIAL
.. . . .. 

Dear 

REF ID:A66082 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE • 

ARMED FORCES SECURITY AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

Serial: 

IN REPLY REFER TO 

The next regular meeting of SCAG, which had been scheduled to be 

held on 5 and 6 March 1952, is to be hold instead on 12 and 13 March. 

Tho Agenda for the meeting will _be ~cnt you in advance thereof. 

It would be helpful to .:ill concarncd if SCAG mmnbers could dovoto, individually at their own convenience and a day or· two in advance of the schedulod meeting, time to reading and studying two 

important docUill0nts which, although not specifically prepared for 

cxm:nination by SCAG, would bo highly useful in preparation for dctai1cd discussion of certain problems to be considered ut the next 

meeting. 

Those documents review in d0t~il the approaches that arc being 

currently taken and pl1nncd, and the progress that h1s boon made 

thus far, with regard to problems of interest to SCAG. T11cy arc 

primarily muthcmntical in character but certain parts deal with engineering aspects contingent upon the validity of the mathematical 

studios. It ia highly desirable, i:ri particular for those SCAG members 

whose prim:try interests are; in thl, :mathoma.ticil, aGpects, to review 

th0so documents ~s soon as pr:tcticable1 

Unfortunat01y, Lho documents.in question ~re of such a nature 

that thuy cannot be sent you, an::l will have to be studied oi thcr at 

Arlington Hall Stn.1..ion or ut tho Navy Security Station. 

Would you be good 0nough to advise if you can .find the time for 

the purpose indicated 2nd if so, when such a visit will bv convenient? 

I may then arrange f_~-- travel orders artl be pr0pured to assign comfortable desk space for tho day or-t"wo of leisurely study. 

I would like to add that Dr. EngstroJll has indicated his desire 

to discuss SCAG affairs w:i.th you at the time of your visit in advance 

of tho scheduled mooting. Upon receipt of a reply from you, I will 

notify him when you expect to be horc. 

Si~cercly, 

,/- i 

'/~~7.-/z/r--'. v -' . v --~--!.-~~ ~· N· WENGER _ _,, Roar '.Admil!'aJ.1 USN 

---....,...,.___,,,.......,.----,....-,....,...,,,....,.....-........................... ......--------llil;)!.....a:L.l.L.. 1;u;,,,,.._Di_:.roctor 1 !F8' 

roved for Release b NSA on 04-02-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352 • '
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,672
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,867
<ALLOWANCES>                                        29
<INVENTORY>                                      1,518
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,044
<PP&E>                                          12,834
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,026
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,724
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,855
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           337
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,128
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,724
<SALES>                                         13,295
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,295
<CGS>                                            4,375
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,105
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,190
<INCOME-TAX>                                       476
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                714
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       714
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
Doc ID: 3150556
Doc ID: 3150556
Doc ID: 3150556
Doc ID: 3150556
Doc ID: 3150556
Doc ID: 3150556
Doc ID: 3150556
Doc ID: 3150556
Doc ID: 3150556
Doc ID: 3150556
Doc ID: 3150556
Doc ID: 3150556
Doc ID: 3150556
Doc ID: 3150556
Doc ID: 3150556
Doc ID: 3150556
Doc ID: 3150556
Doc ID: 3150556
Doc ID: 3150556
REF ID:A522343 

•• 

SJBlT•D " A z JtJ!Dll! 154 gn ISIQAllltJll. 

8UBDCT1 

npreeentatiw, ·.. wle this reqmat. on behalf ot the Qm.1 

l. rau ,,nt-~7 tlat rtdlippe cleTIBJCU, loaal sma 

d 'Oreq. Be bu , renNICl hill reqmat tor 1Dtormtion aa to 

our action on thia tter u pecullarl7 urgent. 

2o Be u:pleina that b9 1a inf'~ that the Qua1 dlQfoaq bas 

juat reoeived the naoe8881'7 tunda to co~te the purchuing and 

that a favorable reply ham U8 is urgent.17 deaired • 

~ 

.3. I have talephomd thia inf'ormation to the DCI, and I have 

rellQ9d to you his llN&age requesting )'0(1 make an appointment 

to see the DCI as soon as possible, together with ME-. Tqlor, to 

di11CUSa this mtter • 

. Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 09-29-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
, 

REF ID:A66404 

THE INSTITUTE IR ADVANCED STUDY 

PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY 

SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS April 21, 1952 

lh.rector 

Armed Forces Security Agency 

Washington 25, D. c. 

Attn: Mr. William F. Friedman 

Re£: Serial 00219 

Dear Mr. Friedman: 

We are sorry for the del~ in complying with 

JOur request of April 3, wnich was forwarded to Professor von Neumann in Los Alamos. I am including the 

classified publications which were sent to him last 

year, and he asked me to thank you very much for the 

loan of them. 

Yours very truly, 

(~) Secretary 4i.u0/ 

to John 

./ 

von 

~ 

Neumann 

Enclosures 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 04-15-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
- ~ ... ~A65207 atttl\:G 1 

u 

USCIB: 13.2/60 

9 May 1955 

M»10RANDUM FOR THE MarnERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Indoctrination for Access to CCMINT (DIRECTOR, ARFCOS). 

USCIB 13.2/57, 22 April 1955. 

1. Vote sheet replies indicate unanimous approval of the recommendations contained in the reference, thereby determining that the Director, 

Armed Forces C9urier Service (Lt. Colonel Robert P. Muhlbach, USAF) has a 

potential 11need to know". 

2. By this decision, the U. S. Air Force: 

a. Is authorized to proceed with the investigation and indoctrination or Lt. Colonel Muhlbach, leaving the question of if and when he 

will be given COMINT to the discretion of those members of USCIB, and 

representatives or the office 0£ the F.xecutive Secretary, USCIB who will 

have business with him. 

b. Is charged with the responsibility for handling and security 

control of a:rrr C~INT documents it may become necessary to show to the 

Director, ARFCOS. 

3. .All members· will be informed by this office at such time as Lt. 

Colonel Muhlbach is indoctrinated. 

USCIB: lJ.2/60 

FORM A.7031 SEP 97 

NSN: 7540-FM-001-5622 

IWJt>LE T/IA SOUIN'f SIIANNiiB 81H1¥ 

24
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00539-CV

EX PARTE Roberto Pasquale-Gualtier PETITTO

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17655A

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

On June 5, 2019, this court issued an opinion and judgment in this appeal. Appellant 

Roberto Pasquale-Gaultier Petitto timely filed a motion for rehearing and a motion for en banc 

reconsideration. We DENY Appellant’s motion for rehearing, but acting sua sponte to clarify the 

applicable analysis, we withdraw our June 5, 2019 opinion and judgment and substitute the opinion

and judgment of this date in their stead. 

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we AFFIRM the trial court’s order 

DENYING Appellant Robert Pasquale-Gualtier Petitto’s petition for expunction.

Appellant’s motion for en banc reconsideration is moot.

SIGNED July 31, 2019.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 10 April 2006         

amending Decision 95/320/EC setting up a Scientific Committee for Occupational Exposure Limits to Chemical Agents

(2006/275/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

In Article 3 of Decision 95/320/EC, paragraphs 1 and 2 are replaced by the following:

‘1.   The Committee shall be composed of not more than 21 members selected from among suitable candidates proposed by the Member States and reflecting the full range of scientific expertise which is necessary to fulfil the mandate in Article 2, including, in particular, chemistry, toxicology, epidemiology, occupational medicine and industrial hygiene, and general competence in setting OELs.

2.   The Commission shall appoint the members of the Committee, on the basis of their proven scientific expertise and experience, having regard to the need to ensure that the various specific areas are covered.’

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 April 2006.

For the Commission

Vladimír ŠPIDLA            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 188, 9.8.1995, p. 14.

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 24, 2018

a0117

Order 

Clerk

January 24, 2018

156494

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 156494

COA: 338006

Kalamazoo CC: 2016-000774-FC

CHARLES EDWARD PICKETT, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 28, 2017 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-21130

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

STANISLAV SERGEYICH ZABOLOTSKIY, also known as

Stan Zabolotskiy,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-00-CR-861-4

--------------------

December 12, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Stanislav Sergeyich Zabolotskiy

has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Zabolotskiy has not filed a response. Our independent review of

the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
98-2570.

#### State ex rel. Baker v. State Personnel Bd. of Review.

Franklin App. No. 98AP-886. Reported at 85 Ohio St.3d 640, 710 N.E.2d 706. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
U.S. Refinery and Blender Production of Motor Gasoline, Finished, Conventional, Greater than Ed55 (Thousand Barrels)

file:///C|/

... finery%20and%20Blender%20Production%20of%20Motor%20Gasoline,%20Finished,%20Conventional,%20Greater%20than%20Ed55%20(Thousand%20 Barrels).htm [9/18/2013 9:01:52 AM]

View History: Monthly Annual Download Data (XLS File)



### U.S. Refinery and Blender Production of Motor Gasoline, Finished, Conventional, Greater than Ed55 (Thousand Barrels) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010 17 18 51 63 51 59 58 62 59 79 43 50 2011 52 57 80 78 99 96 84 81 81 72 65 73 2012 44 69 90 92 90 86 77 80 77 72 62 52 2013 49 64 73 75 106 98

- = No Data Reported;

-- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/29/2013 Next Release Date: Last Week of September 2013 Referring Pages: Refinery & Blender Net Production of Conventional Gasoline Blended with Fuel Ethanol, Greater than Ed55 U.S. Refinery and Blender Net Production Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1482 

AN ACT 

To improve and reauthorize provisions relating to the application of the antitrust laws to the award of need-based 

educational aid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1482 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Need-Based Edu3 cational Aid Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION RELATING TO THE APPLICATION OF 

5 THE ANTRITRUST LAWS TO THE AWARD OF 

6 NEED-BASED EDUCATIONAL AID. 

7 Section 568 of the Improving America’s Schools Act 

8 of 1994 (15 U.S.C. 1 note) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a)— 

10 (A) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘or’’ 

11 after the semicolon; 

12 (B) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘; or’’ 

13 and inserting a period at the end; and 

14 (C) by striking paragraph (4); and 

15 (2) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘2015’’ and 

16 inserting ‘‘2022’’. 

Passed the Senate July 14, 2015. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1482 

AN ACT 

To improve and reauthorize provisions relating to 

of need-based educational aid. the application of the antitrust laws to the award
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-91,146-01

EX P ARTE CARLOS GARC IA, Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. CR-16- 0668-D-WHC 1 IN THE 22ND DIST RICT COURT F ROM HAYS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of one count of

ag g rava ted sexual assault of a child, three counts of indece ncy with a child by contac t, and two counts of indece ncy with a child by exposure. He was sentenc ed to thirty -five y ear s for count one, fiftee n y ear s for count two, ten y ear s for counts three and four, five y ear s for count five, and ten y ear s, probate d for count six

. The trial court order ed counts one, two, five and six to ru n co n cu rr en t ly and counts three and four to run consec utively

. The Thirteenth Court of A

ppeals aff irmed his c onviction. Garcia v. State , No. 13-17-00218- CR (Tex. App. — Coprus Christi - Edinburg Marc h 28, 2019) (not desig nated for publication). Applicant filed thi s appli cation for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07.2

On April 29, 2020, this Court rema nded this matter to the trial court to obtain aff idavits and finding s of fac t addre ssing Applicant’s claim that he rec eived ineffe ctive assistance of trial counsel. On J uly 23, 2020, this Court receive d the supplemental re cord a fter rema nd, which consisted only of the trial court’s finding s of fac t and conclusions of law. In those finding s of fac t and conclusions of law, the trial court makes ref ere nce to an aff

idavit submitt ed by Applicant’s trial attorney , Christie Wil liams, but no such affida vit was included in the supplementa l rec ord. On J uly 28, 2020, this Court issued an order ins t ru cting the Hay s County District Clerk t o either suppleme nt the rec ord wit h a copy of t rial counsel’s aff idavit, or ce rtify

in writing tha t that t h e af fi d av it of trial counsel is not part of the rec ord. On Aug ust 14, 2020, this Court rec eived a response from the Hay s County District Clerk, which included a written certification that no such aff idavit is on file with that office

. Wit hout an aff idavit from trial counsel, the trial court’s finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law a re not supporte d by

the re cord. The trial court shall insure that the habea s rec ord is supplemented with a copy of the aff idavit of trial counsel to which the trial court’s finding s ref er within thirty day s from the date of this order

. The district cler

k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depo s i t i o n s. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of ti me must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: September

16, 2020 Do not publish
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eaton Vance Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert J. Whelan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  DATE: September 8, 2011/s/ Robert J. Whelan(Signature)Robert J. WhelanChief Financial Officer
• ..... > • REF ID:A71947 

UNIVE~SITY OF ILLINOIS 

DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS 

URBANA, ILLINOIS 

May 1,. 1953 

National Security Agency 

Washington 25, D. c .. 

Att 1 n Mr. W. F. Friedman 

Dear Mr. Friedman: 

In the recent memorandum which I 

sent you I believe I omitted Gordon Pall, Saunders 

MacLa.ne and Lowell Paige from the list of suggested panel members in mathematics. I may also have 

failed to put MacPherson's name in the appropriate panel list. If the memorandum has already been reproduced with these omisAions no harm is done since 

the names can be taken up anyway when we meet •. --- ----- - --- --- - ~- - - -------------- - --

Sincerely yours, 

~-r~ s. s. Cairns '\ 

Head of the Department 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 02-11-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
• REF ID:A72355 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

· Washington 25, D. C. 

GENERAL ORDERS 

NUMBER 9 3 February 1955 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY POST RESTAURANT COUNCIL 

i.· Under the provisions of paragraphs 54 and 55, SR 210-100-1, 

dated 26 May 1952, and delegation of- authority by Head.quarters,· 

Second Army, Fort George G. Meade, Maryland, First Indorsement 

dated 24 January 1955, to National Security Agency letter, Serial 

6071, Subject: Establishment oi' a Post Restaurant Fund, dated 

17 November 1954, a National Security Agency Post Restaurant Council 

is hereby established. 

2. Lieutenant Colonel W. F. Dildine, USA, is appointed NSA 

Post Restaurant Officer, arid Major M. F. Rossano, USAF, is appointed 

Assistant NSA Post Restaurant Officer. 

3. The following individuals are appointed as members of the 

NSA Post Restaurant Council: 

Lt. Colonel W. F. Dildine, USA - President- NSA Post 

Mr. Richard Vickery 

Mrs. Inez Wright 

ENS John E. Mills, USN 

2nd Lt. Mark E. 0 'Ieary 

Miss Iucille James 

Major M. J. Ross~o, USAF 

Restaurant Officer 

- Member - Member - ~ember 

- Member - Member - Assistant NSA Post 

Restaurant Officer - Recorder 

BY COMMAND OF LIEUTENANT GENERAL CANINE: 

OFFICIAL: 

E--e1Um1BELL 

Colonel, AGC 

Adjutant General 

DISTRIBUTION I pl.us 

CG, Second Army 

co, Ft. Meade, Md. 

Individuals Concerned 

JOHN B ACKERMAN 

-Major General, US Air Force 

Chief of Staff 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 01-29-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a