alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,699
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                20,305
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     29,920
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           5,458
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             5,414
<LOANS>                                         51,702
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,116
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,094
<DEPOSITS>                                      89,040
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,189
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        111
<COMMON>                                           317
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 119,094
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,211
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  826
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    23
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,060
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 653
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 803
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,257
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     (94)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,746
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    302
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         302
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       302
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.78
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    101
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,200
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                        10
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,116
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,116
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J OSE M . GO M EZ , D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 11- 50068 D. C . No . 3 : 1 0 - c r - 0 1 4 6 1 - J AH ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J ohn A . H ous t on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r25, 2011 ** B e f o r e : T R O T T , G O U L D , an dR A W L I N S O N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . J o s e M . G o m e z ap p e a ls f r o m th e 4 6 - m o n th s e n te n c e im p o s e df o llo w in g h is g u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n f o rb e in g ad e p o rte da lie n f o u n din th e U n ite dS ta te s , in vi ol a t i on of

8 U . S . C . § 1326. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291, a nd w e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED OC T 28 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 50068 2 G o m e z c o n te n d s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt f a ile dto r e s p o n da d e q u a te lyto h is a r gum e nttha thi s c r i m i na l hi s t oryc a t e goryc l a s s i f i c a t i on ove rr e pr e s e nt e d the s e r io u s n e s s o f

h is c r im in a l h is to ry . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t e rr , m u s t le s s p la in ly e rr , in r e je c tin g th a t ar g u m e n t. Se e U ni te d States v . B l i nki ns op , 606 F . 3d 1110, 11 14 -17 (9th C i r. 20 10 ). AF F I RME D.
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Christina W. HaganChristina W. HaganExecutive Vice President, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer)
•Blocked 1B instances of known malicious or suspicious cyber activity 

through Protective DNS

• Identified over a million network vulnerabilities for remediation 

•Discovered over 8,000 vulnerable host devices 

• Identified over 202,000 vulnerable Partner IPs 

• Identified almost 70,000 vulnerable connective services 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY

CYBERSECURITY SERVICES

Drive Down Risk, Protect DoD Information 

Benefits

Receive NSA Threat Intel 

Partner with NSA on non-public,

DIB-specific NSA threat 

intelligence 

NSA is offering companies with an active DoD contract (sub or prime), or with access to 

non-public, DoD information, several threat-informed cybersecurity solutions to help 

reduce risk of network compromise and protect sensitive but unclassified information.

Improve Network Defense

Our services will help increase 

the security of your networks 

Engage Privately

All partnerships are underpinned 

by Non-Disclosure Agreements 

(NDAs)

Attain Mitigation Guidance

We provide guidance to 

mitigate the vulnerabilities 

illuminated using our services 

CMMC Support

Our services support several NIST 800-171 requirements for Risk 

Assessment, System and Communications Protection, and System 

and Information Integrity families of requirements. 

Success By the Numbers

nsa.gov/ccc FREE FOR DIB CONTRACTORS 
OUR SERVICES

Ask us about additional 

pilots and services! 

Protective Domain Name System (PDNS) 

Block users from connecting to malicious or suspicious 

domains, driving down risk and protecting DOD information. 

1.3 B Malicious/suspicious domains blocked, 

including nation-state spear phishing, malware, botnets, 

and ransomware activity.

CMMC Support - NIST 800-171 System & Information Integrity 3.14.06 

Attack Surface Management

Find and fix issues before they become compromises.

Step one: identify internet-facing assets, and determine possible 

vulnerabilities. Step two: company receives a tailored remediation list, 

prioritized by severity and likeliness of exploitation based on NSA's 

unique insights.

CMMC Support - NIST 800-171 Risk Assessment 3.11.02, 3.11.03 

Threat Intelligence Collaboration

Partner with NSA to receive non-public, DIB specific threat intelligence 

and the opportunity to engage on the materials being shared.

Our services have illuminated, exposed, and remediated active 

nation-state exploitation attempts across hundreds of enrolled customers. 

CMMC Support - NIST 800-171 System & Information Integrity 3.14.03 

Enrollment is Easy:

1. Click “GET STARTED” on nsa.gov/ccc 

2. Confirm you meet eligibility criteria

3. Sign DIB Framework agreement 

nsa.gov/ccc FREE FOR DIB CONTRACTORS 

Thank you for your support during the 

seamless integration of the NSA Cyber 

Security suite for the Defense Industrial 

Base...Within fifteen minutes...we were 

able to configure our...firewall for the 

various services.” 

Industry Partner Testimonial:
Exhibit 23.11  Consent of David Penna  I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of North American Palladium Ltd., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of references to my name and references to my involvement in the preparation of technical information relating to the Lac des Iles mine, Ontario, included in the 2011 Annual Information Form of North American Palladium Ltd., dated March 30, 2012 (the AIF).  I also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-13766) and in the Registration Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-164512) of the references to my name and the above-mentioned information in the AIF.   Dated this 27 day of March, 2012.Name:
/s/David PennaDavid Penna
Secretary Anthony Foxx 

US Secretary ofTransportation 

DOT Office of the Secretary 

1200 New JerseyAvenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

DC 20510-·1502 

July 22, 2014 

RE: Petition ofFort Dodge, IA for a Two-Year Waiver from the 10-Enplanement Statute 

Docket-DOT -OST -2001-10682 

Dear Secretary F oxx, 

: •. , j 

I write to strongly support the Fort Dodge Regional Airport's application for a two-year waiver 

from the 1 0-enplanement per day standard. It is clear that the decline in service is a temporary 

condition, and I expect air service at Fort Dodge to be strong in the future. 

Fort Dodge Regional Airport has long provided dependable air service to Fort Dodge, supporting 

economic development around the region. However, in February 2014, after several months of 

providing inconsistent service, Great Lakes Aviation unexpectedly suspended service to Fort 

Dodge. Despite this situation, the airport was just 196 passengers short of meeting the 10 

enplanement per day requirement over FY13. During this time, Great Lakes Aviation cancelled 

54 flights with 1 ,026 available seats, which would have easily accounted for 196 passengers. 

This suspension in air service will also cause Fort Dodge to fall below 10 enplanements per day 

for federal FY14; thus the request for a two-year waiver. 

In the months since the suspension, the Airport has been working hard to find an air carrier that 

will give the Airport consistent and reliable service and, as you know, they are in the final steps 

of securing a new contract. With the new contract, I have no doubt that Fort Dodge Regional 

Airport will meet the 1 0-emplanement per day requirement, as they have done in the past, when 

they averaged 35.6 enplanements per day in calendar year 2011 and 18.2 enplanements per day 

for 2012. 

I have worked with the staff at Fort Dodge Regional Airport throughout the last few months as 

they navigate these changes, and they have worked hard to find the right path fonvard for the 

Airport. I am confident that with the new contract, Fort Dodge Regional will return to providing 

reliable service to Central Iowa. 
Essential Air Service at Fort Dodge has been critical to job creation and economic development 

in Fort Dodge and surrounding areas. I strongly urge you to grant them the waiver and allow 

them to get back to providing dependable air service to Fort Dodge. 

Sincerely, 

Tom Harkin 

United States Senator
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       3,526,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,613,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   312,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,549,000
<PP&E>                                      20,474,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,121,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             105,052,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,006,000
<BONDS>                                     74,127,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        84,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,171,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               105,052,000
<SALES>                                     15,882,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,882,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,633,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,545,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,371,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,667,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (50,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,717,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,717,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Mack V. Traynor, III, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of HEI, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c)  Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.    /s/ Mack V. Traynor, III  Mack V. Traynor, III
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      35,932,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,094,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 10,459,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            58,682,000
<PP&E>                                      27,495,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,080,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             123,845,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,952,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       852,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,662,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               123,845,000
<SALES>                                     37,295,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            37,295,000
<CGS>                                       23,697,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,937,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,108,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,250,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,250,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (614,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,636,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .73


</TABLE>
STANDARD FORM NO. IA e e 

·office Mem_orandum • UNITED sTATEs GovERNMEN:r 

TO 

FROM 

Mt-') F.riedmml, .AFSA-OOl 

Ml-. P.owJ.ett, AFSA-02T 

SUBJECT: Schedule for SOAG Presentation 

D4 TE. 24 April 1951 

Reference: Memorandum trom .AFSA-OOT to AFSAOar dated 11 April 1951. 

Herewith is the detailed SOAG presentation which I promised 700. 1n 

an earlier memorandm. 

~~-;a. BO\lL&'r!' 

/11MlllllUcal Director 

Ottice ot Operations 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-16-2014 purs_uantto E .0. 1352a 

----------------------

.. ,:; 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

First Da1. 

P.M. Second Period. 

1. History orOcomint Problem. 

a. Nature of 11....-_______ ___J 

b. Developments since 1945. 

c1: 

(2' 

(3.,__ _ __. 

( 4) Coleridge 

c. Increasing security trends. 

2. Introduction to Albatross. 

a. 

b. 

Traffic. 

( l) Appearance (Samples). 

(2) External characteristics. 

(3) Indicators. 

(4) Historical development. 

(5) Volumes. 

(6) Inaccuracies (Garbles). 

(7) Stutters. 

Statistics of traffic. 

{l) Frequency counts of cipher. 

(2) Frequency comt s of' plain text. 

(3) Frequency counts of indicators. 

\I 

:::z:::tl :? r-· ..1.... r -',2 .,..~ ~ ~ ,,. • -l-1 

, 

(30 Minutes) 

(l Hour) 

Tf7 I _) z;: r f-.. L r 71 l v"' N 
f r (~:t;: J.P: A§6,0~'\ 

-· ,,,_ . 

/EO 3.3(h)(2) 

. PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

'aeoond Day. 

o. Types of'LJMessages. 

(1) Depths. 

(2) Plain text. I 

(3) Mono-alphabets. 

(4) Pa?Jtial mono-alphabets. 

(5) Complete Isomorphism. 

(6) Changing Isomorphism. 

<1> .__I __ ____.._.t 

A.M. - ABS 

l. Relation of'LJmessages to our concepts 

of' the ma.chine. 

2. Recovered Elelll.ente. 

a. Their significance. 

b. Non-random features. 

c. Motion of' wheels. 

3. TOUR (AFSA-22) 

4. Attempts to exploit recovered elements. 

(l Hour) 

(1 Hour} 

(l Hour) 

(1 Hgur) 

a. Statistical methods used to recover additional 

elements. 

b. Plain text of'feet assumption. 

o. I 

2 

see,,, Er·· A'(- o;P# 
.. .r..:.t - ~ f .. ... I 

rf c. t .... I\ Y\1 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

P.M. - ARS. 

5. Attempts to solve otherOmesaages Cl! Hours) 

a. Met.hods. 

b. 62442 .__I ____ ___. 

c. "The Message" 1----------- ..... 

6. statistical tests to discover other machine (45 Minu:tes) 

characteristics. 

a. I.one mesaase stii~. 

b. Round Robin I.C. 

c. Bound lbb1n Iso search. 

7. Ma.ob.me .Methods 

8. Tour 

a. Abner 

b. lbbin 

(Others to be determined.) 

(45 Mi.mtea) 

(l Hour) 

Third~· 

A.M. - .AHS. 

l. Critique. 

a. Qu.estions :Involving mathematical 

properties ot wired wheels. 

(1 llour) 

b. Use of matrices :1n eolV1DS wheel w:tr1ngs. (l Rou.r) 

o. Gemral discussion. (2 Roa.rs ) 

3 

c tf.' : d.EC ~··,r=-r= .. ; .. - > '
**Exhibit 32.2**

 
| **CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT  TO SECTION 906 OF** |
|-----------------------------------------------------|
| **THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF  2002**                 |

 

In connection with this AnnualReport on Form 40-F of North American Palladium Ltd. (the “Report”) forthe year ended December 31, 2007, I, G. Fraser B. Sinclair, VicePresident, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the issuer, certify pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe issuer.

 
| Date: March 31, 2008 | By:    | /s/ G. Fraser B. Sinclair                            |
|---------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   |                                                 |
|                      |   | G. Fraser B. Sinclair                                |
|                      |   | Vice President, Finance and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

This certification accompaniesthe annual report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, be deemed filed by the issuer for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

----
REF ID:A65838 

l'he Resea& and Development Board Staff.esents 

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FOR NATIONAL SECURITY . 

Dr. Eric A. Walker, Executive Secretary·, Presidi~& V"' 

Wednesday April 25, 1951 

10:00 a.m. 

10:05 a.m. 

10:15 a.m. 

Room 5A-1070 - The Pentagon 

WELCOME Dr. William Webster, Chairman 

INTRODUCTION Dr. S. D. Cornell 

PROBLEMS UNDER ATTACK 

Geophysics and Geography 

Human Resources 

Medical Sciences 

Fuels and Lubricants 

Metallurgy 

Equipment and Materials 

Aeronautics 

Dr . H. E. Landsberg 

Dr. D. W. Chapman 

Dr. 1. M. Pisani 

Mr. D. B. Brooks 

Mr. N. C. Fick 

·~-----C-hemical Warfare 

Mr. E. B. Williams 

Mr . J, .P. .• ~dding 

Dr. H. N. Worthley 

11:30 a.m. 

1:00 p .m. 

2:00 p.m. 

2:15 p.m. 

3:00 p .m. 

3:15 p.m. 

3:30 p.m. 

Luncheon Break 

Atomic Energy 

Electronics 

Ordnance 

Guided Missiles 

Biological Warfare 

Highlights of the 

Canadian Program 

Mr. D. Z. Beckler 

Mr. E. A. Speakman 

Mr. R. J. Coe 

Mr. F. A. Darwin 

Mr. E. Wetter 

Dr . 0. M. Solandt, Chairman 

Defence Research Board of Canada 

LESSONS FROM KOREA 

Colonel C. G. Patterson, USA 

Captain James R. Lee, USN 

Colonel L. 0. Peterson, U~AF 

Break 

THE BUDGET FOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 

Mr. N. D. Crane 

TASKS BEFORE VS 

Dr. Walker 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 04-14-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
### -82 -80 -78 -76

36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 09/08 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Sep 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.11 N 77.11 WMeters AGL