alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, Mack V. Traynor, III, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of HEI, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       /s/ Mack V. Traynor, III         Mack V. Traynor, III    Chief Executive Officer and President  Date: January 10, 2006
D 

c 

REF ID:A522574 

TOP SECRET ~ 

USCIB: 14/137 

11 J'une l 9Sl 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MJl!MBERS OF USCIB: 

Subjeot: 

Enolosure: 

lo 

mationo 

USOIB: 11+/1)7 

French Commwiioat1on Seour1tyo 

Copy Memo Exeoo Sec'y., N.s.c., from 

Chrmn, USCIB, less enclosure. 

The Enclosure is forwarded tor intor-

~~~__,-1 ___ _ 

Cf?. D • JONES 

J'. W. PEARSON 

Secretariat .. uscm 

TOP SECRET 

Declassified and approv:d for release by NSA on 05-28-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 
7 / .. . ~ - REF ID:A522574 

TOP SECRET ~ 

S June 19.51 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, NATIONAL SECURITY cotJNcft: 

Subject: 

Enclosure: 

French Commun1oat1on Securityo 

Final Report of the u.s./U.K. co.nrerenoe 

on French Communication Security, 

l. The wisatistactory state of conununicntion security praotioes and procedures within the French Government has 

recently become a matter of increasing concern to the United 

States CoI1D11unications Intelligence Board (UOOIB) and its 

British oowiterpart, the London Signal Intelligence Board 

(LSIB) o 

2. With a view to possible improvement ot this situ• 

ation. especially as it pertains to the security of French 

diplomatic oommu.nications, UOOIB and LSIB representatives _ have .met and agreed upon a detailed method of approach to 

Frenoh high-level authorities, to be implemented when the 

two Boards mentioned above deem it advisable, after approval 

by the appropriate authorities of the two Governmenteo However, the results ot·Tripartite (U.s./u.K./Frenoh) General 

Security discassions, now in progress, are to be oonsidered 

by the two Boards before any implementing action is undertakeno 

3o The report of the USCIB-LSIB representatives is 

forwarded herewith (Enclosure) tor approval by- the National 

Security Couno1lo· With re:terence to paragraph J.,.e, page 4 

of this EJlolosure, USCIB has agreed that tb.e U .so part of 

the sixty additional Combined Cipher Maohines (CCM) to be 

provided would be furnished when practicable with due consideration of u.s. National requirements, and other prior international commitmentso 

- 4o In view or the sensitive nature and importance ot 

this matter and the possible international complications resulting from the proposed action, the handling and dis .. · . tr1but1oa of the Enolosure is considered to warrant special 

oonsiderationo 

/s/ ~falter Bo Smith 

WALTER B. SMITH 

Chairman, United States CoD111unications Intelligence Boardo 

TOP SECRET
# CE2004084EN.01052201.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/522 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/522

---

(2004/C 84 E/0598)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-4079/03

by Chris Davies (ELDR) to the Commission

(14 January 2004)

Subject:   Bird trapping on Cyprus

Subject:

Birdlife International alleges that illegal bird trapping on Cyprus, using both mist nets and lime sticks, has increased by 100 % over the past year, despite Government assurances to the contrary.

Will the Commission state whether the trapping of migratory birds in these ways will be contrary to EU law after the accession of Cyprus on 1 May 2004?

If so, has the Commission indicated to the Government of Cyprus that infringement proceedings may commence rapidly if the situation continues after the date of accession?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(23 February 2004)

(23 February 2004)

As an acceding country, Cyprus will be required to fully implement and enforce the Birds Directive (1) on 1 May 2004. No transition period has been given and no specific derogations have been requested by Cyprus. In October 2003 Cyprus adopted national legislation to transpose the requirements of both the Birds and Habitats Directives (2).

1

2

More specifically, the Commission clearly pointed out during the negotiation for accession that certain bird-trapping methods, like the ones involving the use of mist nets and lime sticks, are incompatible with the provisions of the Birds Directive. The practice is illegal in Cyprus and the Cypriot authorities have assured the Commission that they would step up efforts for effective enforcement of the law in question.

The Commission continues to monitor the situation and the progress made by Cyprus in working towards meeting its obligations under Community law, not just in transposition but also in implementation and enforcement. Should problems be observed, then the Commission will raise them with the national authorities to seek their resolution. The Commission wishes to assure the Honourable Member that it will not hesitate to take all the appropriate measures, in order to guarantee the correct application of Community environmental law by its Member States.

---

(1)  Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds, OJ L 103, 25.4.1979.

1

(2)  Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, OJ L 206, 22.7.1992.

2

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-11248

Conference Calendar

 

WINDELL EUGENE HENRY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MARK A. VERNON, Officer, City of Dallas,

Badge #6528; NFN JOHNSON, Officer, City

of Dallas, Badge #6304; LORI MONI SCHOENHOLZ,

Officer, City of Dallas, Badge #7361; M. L.

HENSON, Affiant in arrest #98-080064, service

#0945563H, City of Dallas, 

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:00-CV-1132-H

--------------------

October 26, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Windell Eugene Henry (Henry), Texas prisoner #889135,

appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights action

as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 

The district court did not indicate whether its dismissal of

Henry’s claims as frivolous was with or without prejudice. 

Accordingly, we will presume that the dismissal is without
No. 00-11248

-2-

prejudice. Graves v. Hampton, 1 F.3d 315, 319 (5th Cir. 1993),

abrogated on other grounds by Arvie v. Broussard, 42 F.3d 249,

250 (5th Cir. 1994). Thus, we need not address Henry’s arguments

that the district court erred in dismissing his claims with

prejudice. We nevertheless note that his appellate arguments are

without merit. See Boyd v. Bigger, 31 F.3d 279, 284 (5th Cir.

1994); Lewis v. Beddingfield, 20 F.3d 123, 125 (5th Cir. 1994). 

Henry’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. 

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). 

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.

R. 42.2. The dismissal of this appeal and the district court's

dismissal of this lawsuit as frivolous constitute two strikes for

purposes of the 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) bar. Adepegba v. Hammons,

103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). Henry has previously been

issued two strikes by this court. See Henry v. Francis, No. 00-

10623 (5th Cir. Dec. 13, 2000). As Henry has accumulated three

strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action

or appeal brought in a United States court while he is

incarcerated unless he is under imminent danger of serious

physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION ISSUED.
# CE2004088EN.01052901.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/529 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/529

---

(2004/C 88 E/0542)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0760/04

by José García-Margallo y Marfil (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(11 March 2004)

Subject:   Implementation of the financial services action plan (FSAP) in the new Member States

Subject:

Does the Commission envisage flanking measures for implementing the financial services action plan in the accession countries, which were basically not involved in drafting the main directives introduced by the FSAP?

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(21 April 2004)

(21 April 2004)

The measures of the Financial Services Action Plan (FSAP) which have an implementation deadline before 1 May 2004 will form part of the ‘acquis’ which all Acceding Countries will need to take over and implement from the date of accession.

Where implementation deadlines of FSAP measures are later than May 2004, the later deadline will also apply to Acceding Countries. To be fully informed about these measures, delegates from the Acceding Countries have been included as observers in all relevant preparatory and regulatory institutional committees over the last year (2003).

The Commission recalls that the Act of Accession foresees transitional measures — limited in scope and time — for specific Directives in the financial services sector. These transitional measures apply to the local market; it will not be possible to benefit from direct access to the European Internal Market while complying with less strict regulations. All transitional measures will end by the end of 2007 at the latest. The measures concern: the minimum capital requirement for co-operative credit institutions under the Banking Directive (1) (involving Cyprus, Hungary, Poland and Slovenia); and the Deposit Guarantee and Investor Compensation Schemes (2) (involving Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Slovakia).

1

2

Finally, the Commission has for some time maintained an intensive dialogue with Acceding Countries in the field of financial services, notably by means of peer reviews carried out by experts from the EU15. This has led to recommendations and action plans being drawn up by the Acceding Countries to ensure effective implementation of the ‘acquis’ in this field, including FSAP measures already adopted.

---

(1)  Directive 2000/12/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 20 March 2000 relating to the taking up and pursuit of the business of credit institutions, OJ L 126, 26.5.2000.

1

(2)  Directive 94/19/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on deposit-guarantee schemes, OJ L 135, 31.5.1994.

2

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

FRANKLIN P. JONES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2024-0238

[August 8, 2024]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; William Loy Roby, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 432017CF000393A.

Franklin P. Jones, Blountstown, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
TP 7245E

1 of 1 

AD Number: CF-2015-08

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is issued pursuant to Civil Aviation Regulation (CAR) 521.427. 

No person shall conduct a take-off or permit a take-off to be conducted in an aircraft that is in their legal 

custody and control, unless the requirements of CAR 605.84 pertaining to ADs are met. Standard 625 - 

Aircraft Equipment and Maintenance Standards Appendix H provides information concerning alternative 

means of compliance (AMOC) to ADs.

Number:

CF-2015-08

ATA:

34

Effective Date:

28 April 2015 

Type Certificate:

A-131

Subject: 

Navigation - Flight Instruments - Unreliable Air Data in the Cockpit

Applicability:

Bombardier Inc. model CL-600-2D15 and CL-600-2D24 aeroplanes.

Compliance:

Within 30 days from the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished.

Background:

Two in-service incidents have been reported on CL-600-2C10 aeroplanes regarding a loss of all air data 

information in the cockpit. The air data information was recovered as the aeroplane descended to lower 

altitudes. An investigation determined that the root cause in both events was high altitude icing 

(ice crystal contamination). If not addressed, this condition may affect continued safe flight.

Due to similarities in the air data systems, such events could happen on all Bombardier CRJ models, 

CL-600-2B19, CL-600-2C10, CL-600-2D15, CL-600-2D24 and CL-600-2E25. Therefore, the corrective 

actions for these models will be mandated once their respective Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) revisions 

become available. 

This AD mandates the incorporation of AFM procedures to guide the crew to stabilize the aeroplanes 

airspeed and attitude for continued safe flight.

Corrective Actions:

Amend the Transport Canada approved AFM by incorporating the procedure for Unreliable Airspeed as 

detailed in Revision 10, Section 03-19-1 - Emergency Procedures, dated 22 December 2014, or later 

revisions of this procedure approved by Transport Canada.

Following incorporation of the above mentioned procedure, advise all flight crews of the changes in 

Emergency Procedures for Unreliable Airspeed.

Authorization:

For the Minister of Transport, 

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY 

Derek Ferguson

Chief, Continuing Airworthiness

Issued on 15 April 2015 

Contact:

Gordanko Jeremic, Continuing Airworthiness, Ottawa, telephone 613-952-4357, facsimile 613-996-9178 

or e-mail AD-CN@tc.gc.ca or any Transport Canada Centre.
USCIB: 13.2/17 

REF ID:A65691 

SECR.Er 

l4 May 1954 

Subject: Clearance for COMINT (Mr. Rowland Hughes and 

:Mr. Bryce Har low) • 

1. The enclosure is forwarded at the request of the CIA 

Member for a determination of the "need to lmow" of Mr. Rowland 

Hughes and Mr. Bryce Harlow, both of whom aro participants in 

National Security Council.deliberations. 

2. It is requ~gued that vote sheet replies be returned 

to this office by 28 May 1954. 

Enclosure 

Copy of CIA Memo 

dtd 13 May 54, 

subject a/s. 

USCIB: J:J.2/1.7 

24 

SECRET 

eclassified and approved for release 

y NSA on 11-21-2014 pursuant to 

.0. 13526 
• REF ID:A65691 

St;CH:E'f 

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGEMCY 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

13 May 1954 

.MEIDRANDUM FOR: Executive Secretary, USCIB 

SUBJECT Clearance for COMINT 

1. The Executive Secretary, National Security Council, has 

caxpressed a desire that all members of the National Security 

Council who normally attend meetings of the Council be indoctrinated for COMINT in order that it may not become necessary to 

exclude any members from meetings at which COMINT might be 

brought, into the discussion. The list f'urnished by the Executive Secretary consists of the following: 

Secretary of State - John Foster Dulles 

Under Secretary of State - General Walter B. Smith 

Secretary of Def snse - Charles E. Wilson 

Deputy Secretary of Defense - Robert D • .Anderson 

Director of Foreign Operations - Harold E. Stassen 

Director, Of'f'ice of' Def'ense Mobilization - .Arthur S. Fleming 

Secretary of the Treasury - George M. Humphreys 

Director, Bureau of the Budget - Rowland Hughes 

Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Stai'f - Admiral Arthur w. Radford 

Director of Central Intelligence - Allen w. Dulles 

Special Assistant to The President f'or NSC Affairs - Robert Cutler 

Military Aide to Tha President - .Brig. Gen. Paul T. Carroll 

Administrative Assistant to The President - Bryce Harlow 

Chair.man, Atomic Energy Commission - Lewis E. Strauss 

2. It has been determined that all individuals on the list are 

currently cleared and indoctrinated with the exception of Messrs. 

Hughes and Harlow. It is requested, theref'ore, that USCIB determine 

the "need to lmow" of these individuals in accordance 'With USCIB 

Directive No. 5, follo'Wing which, action will be taken by this Agency 

to indoctrinate them in the absence of derogatory information which 

would preclude same. 

FOR THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE: 

En.closure with 'JJ.2/17 dtd 14 May 1954. 

SECRET 

(signed) 

HUNTINGTON D. SHELDON 

CIA MEMBER, USCIB
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Dieter P. Schilling, President and Chief Executive Officer of Delphax Technologies Inc. (the
Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: February 13, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Dieter P. Schilling              
|                         |  |     |  | Dieter P. Schilling                  
|                         |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1466 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to modify payment under 

the Medicare program for outpatient department procedures that utilize 

drugs as supplies, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2015 

Mr. KIRK (for himself, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. BURR, Mr. SCHUMER, and Mr. 

CARPER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to modify 

payment under the Medicare program for outpatient department procedures that utilize drugs as supplies, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Equal Access 

5 to Treatments Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1466 IS

1 SEC. 2. PAYMENT UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM FOR 

2 OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT PROCEDURES 

3 THAT UTILIZE DRUGS AS SUPPLIES. 

4 Section 1833(t)(2)(G) of the Social Security Act (42 

5 U.S.C. 1395l(t)(2)(G)) is amended by striking ‘‘shall’’ and 

6 all that follows and inserting the following: ‘‘shall— 

7 ‘‘(i) create additional groups of cov8 ered OPD services that classify separately 

9 those procedures that utilize contrast 

10 agents from those that do not; 

11 ‘‘(ii) create and implement, for serv12 ices furnished after the date of the enact13 ment of this clause and in a budget neutral 

14 manner, additional groups of covered OPD 

15 services that classify separately those pro16 cedures that utilize a drug (other than con17 trast agents, diagnostic radiopharmaceuti18 cals, or anesthesia drugs) that both— 

19 ‘‘(I) has a cost above the drug 

20 packaging threshold; and 

21 ‘‘(II) functions as a supply when 

22 used in a diagnostic test or procedure; 

23 from those that do not; and’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>



                                                                      Exhibit 23



                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8, No 333-47410) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Option Plan; Registration
Statement (Form S-8, No 333-93513) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Option Plan;
Registration Statement (Form S-8, No 333-46291) pertaining to the 1998 Stock
Option Plan; Registration Statement (Form S-8, No 33-56504) pertaining to the
1992 Stock Option Plan and the 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan;
Registration Statement (Form S-8, No 33-63600) pertaining to the 1993 Company
Stock Purchase Plan; Registration Statement (Form S-8, No 333-18995) pertaining
to the 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan; Registration Statement
(Form S-8, No 33-84136) pertaining to the 1992 Stock Option Plan; Registration
Statement (Form S-3, No 33-92016); and Registration Statement (Form S-8, No
333-74744) of The DeWolfe Companies, Inc. of our report dated January 25, 2002,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of The
DeWolfe Companies, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2001.



                                                              Ernst & Young, LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
March 21, 2002
REF ID:A65654 

USCIB: 13. 2/.'.31 

30 August 1954 

:£~J)RAW!JM FOR THE MEMBERS QF, IBCIB: 

Subject: Approval of USCIB 13.2/26. 

1. Vote Sheet replies to the document mentioned in 

the above subject indicate approval by all members for clearance of Mr. Victor E. Cooley. 

2. The CIA member has been notified informally of 

this decision. 

IBCIB: 13. 2/31 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 04-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

24