alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004088EN.01056501.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/565 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/565

---

(2004/C 88 E/0576)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1073/04

by Proinsias De Rossa (PSE) to the Commission

(6 April 2004)

Subject:   Architectural quality in urban and rural environments

Subject:

What follow-up has there been to the resolution agreed at the 23 November 2000 meeting of the Culture Council on ‘Architectural quality in urban and rural environments’? What initiatives has the Commission taken or is it considering on this issue since this resolution was agreed, specifically in relation to the call to it to seek ways and means of ensuring in the application of the Structural Funds a ‘wider consideration of architectural quality and the conservation of cultural heritage’?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(30 April 2004)

(30 April 2004)

Projects in the field of culture, including those relating to the architectural quality of the built environment, have feature prominently in the regional development programmes supported by the European Union under the Structural Funds. In order to understand better the nature of interventions in this field the Commission undertook a specific study involving a wide ranging questionnaire which was sent to the Member States. The results of this investigation are available in the form of a working document of the Commission services, on the internet: (http://europa.eu.int/comm/culture/eac/sources_info/compolitics/ fond_structurel_en.html).

---
# CE2004084EN.01055701.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/557 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/557

---

(2004/C 84 E/0635)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0252/04

by Raquel Cardoso (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(3 February 2004)

Subject:   Financing of the Natura 2000 network

Subject:

Since 1992 Article 8 of the Habitats Directive (Directive 92/43/EEC (1) of 21 May 1992) has provided for the co-financing of the Natura 2000 network. The Commission's work programme for 2003 included the submission of a communication on the financing of the Natura 2000 network in September.

1

A number of Member States have asked Commissioner Margot Wallström at successive meetings of the Environment Ministers' Council for details of the Commission's response to the Natura 2000 network's funding needs. The Commission's replies to these questions have clearly been unsatisfactory.

Will the Commission commit itself to submitting the communication on the financing of the Natura 2000 network by a specific date so as to meet the objectives set out in the Sixth Environment Action Programme?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(2 March 2004)

(2 March 2004)

The Commission has committed itself to submitting a Communication on the Financing of Natura 2000 in 2004. This proposal has been carried forward from its 2003 working programme. The Communication is expected for the first half of 2004.

---

(1)  OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7.

1

---
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

11111111111111111111111111111M11111111111111111 

July 23, 1968 

MEMORANDUM TO COLONEL BATTLE 

SUBJECT: MOL Readout Capability 

On July 22, 1968, Mr. H. Bried of the General Electric 

 Company visited the undersigned to discuss the development 

of a photographic readout capability for the MOL. The G.E. 

 effort is in support of their advanced planning studies for 

 MOL and General Stewart's expressed desire to eventually 

include a readout capability. 

Realizing that funding limitations presently negate the 

incorporation of readout in the baseline program, G.E. is 

 presently investigating applicable developments for application in a follow-on program. Therefore, they would like 

to discuss the subject with CBS Labs, but desire to comply 

 with established procedures of concerned agencies. We 

 discussed the matter with Lt Col Cohen (in TDY from L.A.Q. 

 He suggested that G.E. discuss the system with Lt Col Skantze 

a at the Systems Office if they wish, and that upon his return 

to the West Coast, Lt Col Cohen will arrange with SP for a 

G.E. conference with CBS Labs. 

This was entirely satisfactory with Mr. Bried, and he 

would also like to discuss the subject with you at your 

 convenience, if you so desire. 

/_5/ 

RICHARD A. DELONG 

Major, USAF 

SAFSLO 

DORIAN Page 1 of 1 pages 

Copyip-of 2 copies 

SAFSL Control 4Trtgrftal 

flf-e- 07/-6 5-/
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Airguide, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) I, James Frack, President, Treasurer and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



Date:

July 3, 2006



/s/  James Frack

James Frack

President, Treasurer

& Chief Executive Officer
EX-10.52






Exhibit 10.52



First Amendment To Securities Purchase Agreement



             This FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), dated as of
October 27, 2008, between Ecology Coatings, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Nevada (the “Company”), and Equity 11, Ltd., a corporation organized under the
laws of the state of Michigan (the “Purchaser”).



     1.     The Company has deemed it to be in its best interest to provide additional time and
flexibility to Purchaser to decide whether to make additional purchase(s) of Convertible Preferred
Shares. Accordingly, the parties agree to amend Section 2.2 of the Agreement as follows:




			
	     Section 2.2	 	Purchases of Additional Preferred Shares.





     (1)     Purchaser, in Purchaser’s sole and absolute discretion, may purchase up to 3740 additional
Convertible Preferred Shares by the dates and not less than the amounts as shown below:




	 	 	 	 	 
	Days from Initial Closing	 	Number of Shares	 	Aggregate Purchase Price
	30

	 	750
	 	$750,000





     Thereafter, until May 28, 2009, Purchaser may make additional purchases of up to 2,990
additional Convertible Preferred Shares at times and in amounts at its discretion.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	ECOLOGY COATINGS, INC.	 	 	 	EQUITY 11, LTD.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	BY:

	 	/s/Robert G. Crockett
	 	 
	 	By:
	 	/s/ J.B. Smith
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Its:

	 	CEO
	 	 	 	Its:
	 	CEO
REF ID:A66025 

-

COPY 

International Business Machines Corporation 

590 Madison Avenue 

New York 22, N. Y. 

June 14, 1951 

Director 

Armed Forces Security Agency 

Washington 2;, D. c. 

Attention of Captain John s. Harper 

Dear Captain Harper: 

In a communication I received from Admiral Stone, I 

note that ·r was addressed at Endicott, New York, and the material 

was delayed somewhat in reaching me. My headquarters are at 

590 Madison Avenue, New York 22, New York, am I would appreciate your correcting your records accordingly. 

I am looking forward to seeing you on July 10th, and will 

get in touch with you if I am in Washington before then. 

Sincerely yours, 

/s/ John c. McPherson 

John c. McPherson 

Vice President 

CO Pl 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 04-15-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Al A. Gonsoulin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PHI, Inc. (the “Company”), certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for theperiod covered by such Report.        Dated: May 5, 2006 By:  /s/ Al A. Gonsoulin    Al A. Gonsoulin    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
# CE2004070EN.01026501.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/265 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/265

---

(2004/C 70 E/288)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3514/03

by Giovanni Pittella (PSE) to the Commission

(25 November 2003)

Subject:   Course financed by means of the Structural Funds

Subject:

On 11 November 2002 the Naples-based Istituto nazionale di formazione per le imprese culturali launched a course entitled ‘Content Specialist & Designer’ within the PON Asse III misura III 6/D-Codice progetto 5387 discipline. The course is financed by means of the European Social Fund.

The course students (who had to go through a selection procedure) have not received the grant awarded to them (EUR 10 389,14 per student), since the person in charge of the course — a Mr Palladino — has been deemed untrustworthy by the Ministry for State Education, Universities and Scientific Research on account of his previous record. On 30 April 2003 (20 days before the course was due to end) the Ministry decided that co-financing would be suspended and that the training project would be abandoned.

On the basis of the above information, does the Commission not think that, irrespective of any judgment regarding Mr Palladino, the 19 pre-selected women should not be denied their grants or have their course certificates withheld?

Does the Commission not agree that, in accordance with the rules, some kind of protection should be offered to the 19 unemployed course students who, having been duly selected, wished to take advantage of the opportunity afforded to them under the Structural Funds?

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(16 December 2003)

(16 December 2003)

The Commission is collecting the information it needs to answer the question. It will communicate its findings as soon as possible.

---
# CE2004084EN.01083901.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/839 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/839

---

(2004/C 84 E/0932)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0668/04

by Proinsias De Rossa (PSE) to the Commission

(9 March 2004)

Subject:   Irish Government's failure to cooperate with Lough Ree investigation

Subject:

What reply, if any, has the Commission received from the Irish Government in response to the letter of formal notice it sent to Ireland in April 2003, as announced in IP/03/544, regarding the Irish Government's failure to cooperate with its investigations into complaints about the deterioration of water quality in Lough Ree, specifically in relation to taking account of the cumulative effects of new developments in accordance with the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) (1)?

1

What action has the Commission taken or is it considering in this matter?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(7 April 2004)

(7 April 2004)

The Commission's letter of formal notice, referred to by the Honourable Member, addressed non-cooperation by Ireland consisting in a failure to respond to a request for information about compliance with environmental legislation in relation to Lough Ree, County Roscommon. Ireland subsequently provided a detailed response to the Commission's original information request. This response is considered as having brought to an end the infringement for non-cooperation based on Article 10 of the EC Treaty, and no further action is currently contemplated on this ground. The Commission is still considering the substantive issues raised by the original complaint (2).

2

---

(1)  OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7.

1

(2)  P2001/4787.

2

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1707 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1707

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate the Federal building located at 617 Walnut Street in 
   Helena, Arkansas, as the ``Jacob Trieber Federal Building, United 
          States Post Office, and United States Court House''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JACOB TRIEBER FEDERAL BUILDING, UNITED STATES POST OFFICE, 
              AND UNITED STATES COURT HOUSE.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building located at 617 Walnut Street 
in Helena, Arkansas, shall be known and designated as the ``Jacob 
Trieber Federal Building, United States Post Office, and United States 
Court House''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Jacob Trieber Federal Building, United States Post Office, and United 
States Court House''.

            Passed the Senate August 5, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1707

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To designate the Federal building located at 617 Walnut Street in 
   Helena, Arkansas, as the ``Jacob Trieber Federal Building, United 
          States Post Office, and United States Court House''.
```
98-1735.

#### State v. O’Neal.

Hamilton App. No. C-960392. On motion to consolidate case with 98-147, *State v. O’Neal,*Hamilton App. No. C-960392, and 99-906, *State v. O’Neal,*Hamilton App. No. C-980247. Motion denied.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 39 (Friday, February 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10745-10746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04135]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 9047]


Notice of Receipt of NuStar Logistics, L.P., for a Presidential 
Permit To Construct, Connect, Operate, and Maintain Pipeline Facilities 
on the Border of the United States and Mexico

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Department of State (DOS) has 
received an application from NuStar Logistics, L.P. (``NuStar'') for a 
Presidential Permit authorizing the construction, connection, 
operation, and maintenance of pipeline facilities for the export and 
import of petroleum products, including liquefied petroleum gas 
(``LPG'') and natural gas liquids (``NGLs''). If the application is 
approved, the proposed facilities will transport petroleum products 
across the border between the NuStar terminal near Edinburg, Texas and 
the Petroleos Mexicanos (``PEMEX'') Burgos Gas Plant near Reynosa, 
Tamaulipas, Mexico, crossing under the Rio Grande River.
    NuStar is a subsidiary of NuStar Energy L.P., a publicly traded 
master limited partnership based in San Antonio, Texas, and is one of 
the largest independent liquids terminal and pipeline operators in the 
United States. NuStar currently has 8,643 miles of pipeline and 82 
terminal and storage facilities in five countries that store and 
distribute crude oil, refined products and specialty liquids. Its 
system has approximately 91 million barrels of storage capacity.
    Under E.O. 13337, the Secretary of State is designated and 
empowered to receive all applications for Presidential Permits for the 
construction, connection, operation, or maintenance at the borders of 
the United States, of facilities for the exportation or importation of 
liquid petroleum, petroleum products, or other non-gaseous fuels to or 
from a foreign country. The Department of State has the responsibility 
to determine whether

[[Page 10746]]

issuance of a new Presidential Permit for construction, connection, 
operation, and maintenance of a new pipeline at the Burgos facility 
would serve the U.S. national interest.
    The Department anticipates conducting an environmental review 
consistent with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. The 
Department will provide more information on the review process in a 
future Federal Register notice.
    NuStar's application is available at: http://www.state.gov/e/enr/applicant/applicants/index.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Acting Director, Energy Resources 
Bureau, Energy Diplomacy (ENR/EDP/EWA), United States Department of 
State, 2201 C St. NW., Suite 4843, Washington, DC 20520.

    Dated: February 20, 2015.
Chris Davy,
Acting Director, Energy Resources Bureau, Energy Diplomacy (ENR/EDP/
EWA), Bureau of Energy Resources, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-04135 Filed 2-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-AE-P
Exhibit 23.1




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on (i) Form S-3 (Nos. 333-25995, 333-62155, 333-33726, 333-54616,
333-60912, 333-55866, 333-91316-01, 333-102961, and 333-102962-01) and (ii) Form
S-8 (No. 333-56343) of Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. of our report dated
February 21, 2003 relating to the financial statements, which appears in this
Form 10-K.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
February 24, 2003
#### Klassy, Respondent, vs. Smasal, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the county court of Chippewa county dated February 9, 1927: T. J. Connor, Judge.

Automobile accident. Judgment for plaintiff, from which defendant appeals.

For the appellant: *C. B. Culbertson*of Stanley, attorney, and *Linderman, Ramsdell & King*of Eau Claire, of counsel.

For the respondent: *W. PI. Stafford*and *Harold E. Stafford,*both of Chippewa Falls.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31B**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Michael J. Rockenbach, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Emulex Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report.  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules (3a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financialreporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to bedesigned under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: May 12, 2006           /s/ Michael J. Rockenbach    Michael J. Rockenbach    Chief Financial Officer  
45
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Al A. Gonsoulin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PHI, Inc. (the “Company”), certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and 2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for theperiod covered by such Report.Date: August 9, 2006         By:                                                /s/ Al A. Gonsoulin    Al A. Gonsoulin    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
netGuru, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
333-29747) on Form S-8 of netGuru, Inc. of our report dated May 25, 2000, except
as to the third and fourth paragraphs of Note 12, which are as of May 29, 2000
and June 22, 2000, respectively, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of
netGuru, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2000, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive
loss and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended March 31,
2000, which report appears in the March 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-KSB of
netGuru, Inc.



                                            /s/ KPMG LLP
Orange County, California
June 23, 2000