alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
REF ID:A2794177 -----

'"-..;-' ..._,I 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

ARMED FORCES SECURITY AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. IN REPl.Y REFER TO 

4 January 1951 

Dear I .... _____ ___. 

Ao he stated in his letter of 20 December; Colonel Peterson 

turned over to me your comparative table of security rules and I have 

examined it with considerable interest. 'lhe matter of ironing out 

out differences in application of the rules will be taken up very soon, 

I hope. !(r small committee working on the problem of the proper 

classification of instructional documents dealing with traffic analysis is, of course, concerned in the matter. A sub-group is supposed to 

report this week or next week at the latest and then perhaps the full 

.committee will know better how we stand. We shall also take a look at 

the two Military Intelligence pamphlets you left with Colonel Peterson. 

We have no current equivalent pamphlets and have only something much 

out of step with the state of affairs resulting from organizational 

changes ma.de since the end of 1945. 

~ must apologize not only for the delay 1n responding to your 

request for a few copies of the U. s. Ar1I13' and U. s. Air Force manual 

on traffic analysis (TM 32-250; AFll 100-80) but also for being unable to 

send you at this moment more than two copies. Although I asked for 

half a dozen copies immediately upon receipt of your request, something 

went avrey and only by '1113 making repeated inquiries were two copies made 

available to me todey, I am sure that there is no reluctance in providing you with copies--there baa merely been a slip-up somewhere and 

I hope to send you a few more soon. 

After you have exam1ned the manual I would much appreciate 

your comments as to its contents and present classification •. I think I 

told you that there is a considerable amount of disagreement amongst 

ourselves on the latter score and don•t doubt that if you were to ~onsult with a nwnber of your associates, similar differences in view will 

emerge. Your own view will, however, be appreciated if you feel free 

to give it, together w1 th the views of any others who are willing to let 

you have them tor this purpose. 

With best wishes to you tor the New Year and cordial. greetings, 

I am, 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

EO 3. 3 I h I I 2 I 

----.....-----""" 0. B.E., 'Ihe War otfice, 

Whitehall, s.w. l, 

London. 

Sincerel;r yours, 

Wll.LIAM F. FRIEDMAN 

eclassifi ed and a roved for release b NSA on 05-15-2014 ursuantto E .0. 1352
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
ACT Manufacturing, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-3 filed on October 22, 1999
and Registration Statements No. 33-91964, No. 333-36751 and No. 333-84231 on
Form S-8 of our report dated October 15, 1999 appearing in this Current Report
on Form 8-K dated October 22, 1999.




/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
October 22, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              This schedule contains summary financial
                              information extracted from the Consolidated
                              Statements of Income, Cash Flows and Partners'
                              Capital for the three years ended December 31,
                              1998 and the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
                              December 31, 1998 and 1997 and the Notes thereto,
                              for Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. and
                              subsidiaries and is qualified in its entirety by
                              reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000888228
<NAME>                        Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         31,735
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  44,125
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    5,541
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               81,401
<PP&E>                                         1,836,719
<DEPRECIATION>                                 73,333
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,152,272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          57,482
<BONDS>                                        611,571
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,360,663
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,152,272
<SALES>                                        322,617
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               322,617
<CGS>                                          5,860
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  182,712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (19,740)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             40,856
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                118,789
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,572
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            117,217
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (13,611)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   103,606
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.75
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

# AGENCY:

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting; Correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of Energy (DOE), on February 17, 2015, published a notice of open meeting announcing an open meeting of the Biomass Research and Development Technical Advisory Committee. Due to member's availability, the meeting venue has been changed to a webinar and the date and time is now March 5, 2015, 1:30 p.m.-                              ( print page 11186)                            5:30 p.m. As a result, the language is being corrected in this notice.                    

## Corrections

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of February 17, 2015, in FR DOC. 2015-03133, on page 8298, please make the following corrections:                    

                        In the                         **DATES**                         heading, third column, second and third lines, replace text with “Thursday, March 5, 2015, 1:30 p.m.-5:30 p.m. (EDT).                    

                        In the                         **ADDRESSES**                         heading, third column, fourth line, please remove “Marriott Wardman Park, 2660 Woodley Rd. NW., Washington, DC 20008” and replace with “Please register for the Biomass Research and Development Technical Advisory Committee meeting for March 5, 2015, 1:30 p.m. at:                         *https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/​register/​6807084548871333889.*                         After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar.”                    

Issued in Washington, DC, on February 24, 2015.

LaTanya R. Butler,

Deputy Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-04231 Filed 2-27-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
# CE2004088EN.01070302.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/703 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/703

---

(2004/C 88 E/0723)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0676/04

by Proinsias De Rossa (PSE) to the Commission

(9 March 2004)

Subject:   Bushmeat – resource allocation

Subject:

Following the European Parliament's support for the De Rossa report on Petition 461/2000, what funding has been released or is planned to be made available to improve wildlife management? And what resources are planned to support the incorporation of wildlife/bushmeat criteria into poverty assessments?

---
### Re: Interagency comments on RIN 2060-AQ89 Nick Parsons to: Higgins, Cortney 09/28/2011 07:29 AM Cc: Penny Lassiter, Paul Versace, JohnB Chamberlin Cortney, Please find attached EPA's responses to the interagency comments on RIN 2060-AQ89.

EO12866_CMAS_2060-AQ89_Reconsideration_Proposal20110614_Interagency Comments Under EOs 12866 and 13563 EPA 092811.doc
A	division	of	the	American	Chemical	Society	 Phone:	800-631-1884,	614-447-3870

Fax:	614-447-3747

E-mail: answers@cas.org

Web: www.cas.org/products/other-cas-products/client-services/

InventoryExpertService

CAS					•					2540	Olentangy	River	Road					•					P.O.	Box	3343					•					Columbus,	OH		43210-0334					•					USA
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   1-MO
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      281,348
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          24,880
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         4,675
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 240,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 551,203
<COMMON>                                             0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      225,667
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            (2,276)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 223,391
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           120,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              34,870
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      100,000
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      1,022
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   646
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  71,274
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  551,203
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        4,446
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           (1,186)
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       4,365
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       5,464
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        (1,018)
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  29
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   (989)
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1,287
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,276)
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  (2,276)
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                          711
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         (5,705)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
# CE2004088EN.01017601.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/176 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/176

---

(2004/C 88 E/0185)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0362/04

by Graham Watson (ELDR) to the Commission

(12 February 2004)

Subject:   Latvian passport names

Subject:

Could the Commission please tell me why it is necessary under Latvian legislation to demand that individuals passport names comply with the dictates of the Latvian language? For example, if a woman marries, her name cannot be changed on her passport to Smith, it must be written Smite as this is the nearest Latvian version.

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(22 March 2004)

(22 March 2004)

The Commission has always addressed the issue of ‘latvianisation’ of names in passports in its annual Regular Reports under the heading of the so-called Copenhagen political criteria, i.e. the respect for democracy the rule of law, human rights and the protection of minorities. It is certainly an individual right derived from dignity and liberty of a person that his/her name be respected by the State authorities. Moreover, in the case of spouses, they are able to invoke the obligation of the State to respect family life, as for instance, enshrined in Article 7 of the European Charter of Fundamental rights.

In its 2002 Regular Report (1), the Commission noted the changes made by Latvia, following a ruling of its own Constitutional Court. These changes led to a more visible placement of the original name in the passport. However, the Commission also noted the limitation of these changes, in particular that the latvianised form is kept most prominently on the data page. It therefore concluded that the legislation might still be open to challenge from a human rights point of view. But it is for the Courts and not for the Commission to decide about the legality of the Latvian legislation, unless a formal complaint is submitted to the Commission after accession for non-compliance with certain provisions of EU law.

1

---

(1)  COM(2002) 700 final.

1

---
BY OEPUT I Y I CLERT No. 84380



# FILE
APR 2 8 2022
ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERIgFIJPREME COURT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
OSCAR ART STANLEY, Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, Respondent, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS AND DENYING PETITION FOR A

WRIT OF MANDAMUS/ PROHIBITION In this original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus/prohibition, petitioner seeks a writ directing the district court to resentence him under amendments to Nevada's habitual criminal statute. Appellant has filed a motion requesting the appointment of appellate counsel. Appellant is not entitled to appointed counsel at the state's expense in postconviction proceedings. See Brown v. McDaniel, 130 Nev. 565, 570, 331 P.3d 867, 871 (2014);see also Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 755 (1991). Accordingly, the motion is denied.

This court takes no action on appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis for this appeal. The filing fee has already been waived.

We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter and, without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(b)(1); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I447A840, 841, 844 (2004) (providing that writ relief is proper only when there is

no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law and the petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that writ relief is warranted). Petitioner contends that the district court erred in applying NRS 207.01.0 and seeks to have his conviction reversed and remanded to remove his habitual criminal sentencing enhancements. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that writ relief is warranted because petitioner has a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy available to him by way of an appeal from the district court's denial of such relief in the first instance. Petitioner exercised this plain, speedy, and adequate remedy by appealing the district court's order denying his motion to modify sentence in docket no. 83420-COA. Accordingly, we, I

ORDER the Petition DENIED.

, C.J.

Parraguirre

J. Hardesty Stiglich

cc: Oscar Art Stanley Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

'Accordingly we take no action as to petitioner's notice filed on April 18, 2022.

2
# CE2004078EN.01085901.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/859 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/859

---

(2004/C 78 E/0912)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3797/03

by Chris Davies (ELDR) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject:   Sustainable fisheries

Subject:

What use has the Commission made to date, or does it intend to make, of Maríne Stewardship Council certification as a means of developing a sustainable fisheries strategy?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(21 January 2004)

(21 January 2004)

The Maríne Stewardship Council (MSC) certification scheme is a private initiative which rewards certain fishing practices with a distinctive label at the request of fishing operators so that consumers can direct their choices towards their products. While the Commission has no intention of promoting the use of any private certification scheme as a means of developing a sustainable fisheries strategy, it will continue to use its initiative powers to propose legislation and transmit guidelines to fishing, processing and marketing fish in a context of sustainability.

---
Re: Port Everglades Energy Center

Audra Livergood to: Flajole, Andy 09/14/2012 04:13 PM

Cc: Andrew Parks, "Foster, Stacy", "Raffenberg, Matthew", "Gless, Jodie"

Hi Andy,

I do not think it is necessary for us to meet in the next week or so. I have not begun my review 

of the BA yet, but I hope to start my review next week. As for a meeting to discuss the RAI, I 

would suggest that we wait until the RAI has been signed before we set up a meeting. I expect 

that EPA will receive our RAI letter during the first half of Oct., but I cannot be sure on an exact 

date.

Let's touch base at the end of the month when I have a better sense of the RAI timeline. Also, 

my boss is currently on vacation, and will be returning to the office on Sept. 25th.

Best regards,

Audra

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Flajole, Andy <Andy.Flajole@fpl.com> wrote:

Hi Audra,

In your comments on the informal consultation schedule you suggested that we omit the 

meeting FPL proposed for several weeks after your received the BA for review. I wanted to 

touch base with you to ask if you still believe that a meeting in the next week or so would not 

aid your review? FPL is ready to meet at your convenience if you have changed your mind.

We also identified in our initial schedule a meeting October 8th (after FPL anticipates receipt 

of an RAI). Will you and Andrew please confirm that you are working on 10/8 (Columbus 

Day)? If yes, what time is best for our meeting? I’d like to send a meeting invite out as soon 

as possible to ensure we have the correct people available. 

Thank You,

Andy Flajole
Environmental Services

(561) 691-2766

-- 

Audra Livergood

Marine Resource Manager

NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service

SERO Protected Resources Division

Fort Lauderdale Field Office

299 East Broward Blvd., Suite 328

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Office (954) 356-7100

Fax (954) 356-7108

For if one link in nature's chain might be lost, another might be lost, until the whole of things will 

vanish by piecemeal.    Thomas Jefferson
# CE2004084EN.01044101.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/441 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/441

---

(2004/C 84 E/0513)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0644/04

by Harald Ettl (PSE) to the Commission

(25 February 2004)

Subject:   Further information on question concerning portability of supplementary pension rights

Subject:

In its reply of 19 February 2004 to Question P-0207/04 (1), the Commission stated that it was currently investigating the scope for the adoption of a binding EU legal act concerning similar minimum provisions to protect mobile workers in relation to the preconditions for access to occupational pension schemes, qualification periods, reassessment of inactive entitlements (i.e. the entitlements of people who have left a scheme but have not yet reached retirement age) and the arrangements for transferring entitlements.

1

What stage have the considerations and preparations with regard to the substance and feasibility of the proposal for a directive reached?

What is the Commission's timetable for the assessment?

When will the Commission submit the proposal for a directive?

Answer given by Mr Dimas on behalf of the Commission

(1 April 2004)

(1 April 2004)

As stated in its answer to the Honourable Member's Written Question No P-0207/04, the Commission is currently investigating the potential benefits of adopting a binding EU act establishing minimum requirements similar to those already in force in a number of Member States.

The Commission will take account of Member States' experience, drawing on the expertise of the Pensions Forum. Over the coming months it will collect from the Member States and Pensions Forum experts the information it needs in order to be able to present a proposal for legislation in autumn 2004.

---

(1)  OJ C 78 E, 27.3.2004.

1

---