alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Dale K., II., an Infant. Oswego County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Laurie K., Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[773 NYS2d 703]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oswego County (David J. Roman, J.), entered October 7, 2002. The order granted the petition and approved the execution of a judicial surrender committing the guardianship and custody of respondent’s son to petitioner for the purpose of adoption.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent, who surrendered her two children for adoption upon the execution of judicial surrenders, appeals from two ex parte orders separately approving those surrenders. However, “no appeal lies from an order entered ex parte” *(Matter of Heitler v Glucksman,*309 AD2d 866, 867 [2003]), and thus we dismiss these appeals *(cf. Matter of Lester MM.,*238 AD2d 627 [1997]; *Matter of Amanda B.,*206 AD2d 636 [1994]). Respondent’s remedy is an action or proceeding “brought on the ground of fraud, duress or coercion in the execution or inducement of [the] surrender[s]” (Social Services Law § 383-c [6] [d]). In any event, contrary to respondent’s *1040contention, the record establishes that the surrenders were voluntary. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the periodic report of Dawson Geophysical Company (the
"Company") Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, L.
Decker Dawson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d);
          and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: August 5, 2004                      /s/ L. Decker Dawson
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
# CE2004088EN.01051601.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/516 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/516

---

(2004/C 88 E/0528)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0616/04

by Klaus Hänsch (PSE) to the Commission

(1 March 2004)

Subject:   Allocation of EU resources

Subject:

As regards the allocation of EU resources to the district (Kreis) of Mettmann and the cities of Duisburg, Düsseldorf, Neuss, Remscheid, Solingen and Wuppertal (in North Rhine-Westphalia), will the Commission give:

| 1. | The total amount and breakdown of EU structural resources received under the individual funds and the various Community programmes and initiatives? |
| --- | --- |

1.

The total amount and breakdown of EU structural resources received under the individual funds and the various Community programmes and initiatives?

| 2. | The amount of EU resources allocated since 1999 under other budgetary headings for pilot projects or — as direct aid — to universities, research establishments, enterprises and other bodies in the above-mentioned cities and the district of Mettmann? |
| --- | --- |

2.

The amount of EU resources allocated since 1999 under other budgetary headings for pilot projects or — as direct aid — to universities, research establishments, enterprises and other bodies in the above-mentioned cities and the district of Mettmann?

| 3. | The number of jobs created or maintained by means of this assistance? |
| --- | --- |

3.

The number of jobs created or maintained by means of this assistance?

Supplementary answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(15 June 2004)

(15 June 2004)

In view of the length of its answer, the Commission is sending it direct to the Honourable Member and to Parliament's Secretariat.

---
rr»Q~OS9~ 

USCIB: 29.17/9 

28 April 1954 

'l'QP SEGRE! 

M!NORANDUM FOR '!HE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

References: 

Decision on Item 1 of the Agenda of the 102nd Meeting 

of USCIB (COMINT Relations with Third Parties). 

(a) USCIB 29.17/4 dated 12 April 1954. 

(b) USCIB 29.17/7 dated 9 April 1954 (Minutes of 

102nd USCIB). 

1. An important omission has been noted in the tentative record 

of decision set forth in the references. Although the record ot 

discussion set forth in reference (b) as well as the notes on which it 

is based clearly show agreement that the Working Committee should 

present papers recommending a position on the agenda items to be pro- posed, neither reference (a) nor the decision recorded in reference (b) 

reflect this agreement. 

2. Accordingly, reference (b) should be amended by insertion or 

the expression 11 , a U.S. position" af'ter the word agenda in the last 

1ine of subparagraph c. of' the decision. A similar notation should be 

made to reference (a). 

USCIB: 29.17/9 

'J'(>.P SECRET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-02-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 

.:
<PAGE>   1
ITEM 6(a) EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                 (in thousands except per common share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED         SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                      JUNE 30                    JUNE 30
                                                ----------------------------------------------
<S>                                              <C>         <C>           <C>         <C> 
PRIMARY:                                           1997       1996           1997        1996
                                                   ----       ----           ----        ----

Weighted average shares outstanding               21,051      20,972        20,971      20,949
                                                 =======     =======       =======     =======

Net Income                                       $28,618     $25,060       $55,037     $45,696

Less convertible preferred stock dividends         1,797          --         3,594          --
                                                 -------     -------       -------     -------

Total                                            $26,821     $25,060       $51,443     $45,696
                                                 =======     =======       =======     =======


Net Income - per share                             $1.27       $1.19         $2.45       $2.18
                                                 =======     =======       =======     =======
FULLY DILUTED:

Weighted average of shares outstanding            21,051      20,972        20,971      20,949

Assumed conversion of common stock equivalents         8          75             9          79

Assumed conversion of convertible securities       2,447          --         2,447          --
                                                 -------     -------       -------     -------

Total                                             23,506      21,047        23,427      21,028
                                                 =======     =======       =======     =======

Net income                                       $28,618     $25,060       $55,037     $45,696

Add convertible debenture interest, net 
  of federal income tax                               58          61           114         123
                                                 -------     -------       -------     -------

Total                                            $28,676     $25,121       $55,151     $45,819
                                                 =======     =======       =======     =======


Net income - per share                             $1.22       $1.19         $2.35       $2.18
                                                 =======     =======       =======     =======
</TABLE>
















                                       17
# CE2004088EN.01067902.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/679 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/679

---

(2004/C 88 E/0698)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0096/04

by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(21 January 2004)

Subject:   Israeli arms for Turkey in exchange for water

Subject:

According to reports published on Monday, 5 January 2003, the Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, and the Turkish Energy Minister, Zeki Cakan, met in Jerusalem to finalise agreements between the two countries whereby Turkey will be supplied with a large quantity of state-of-the-art Israeli tanks and ultra-modern technology for its airforce. In exchange, Israel will receive 50 million cubic metres of water for a period of twenty years from the River Manavgat in Anatolia, which will be transported by a fleet of gigantic tankers currently being built in Israel, which is encountering serious problems with salinisation of its water resources.

Since Turkey is a candidate for accession to the European Union, will the Commission say what it knows about the content of the abovementioned agreements? Will it inform the European Parliament thereof?

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(25 February 2004)

(25 February 2004)

The Commission does not have any specific knowledge nor has it been officially informed about the contents of the agreements mentioned by the Honourable Member.

As the 1993 Copenhagen European Council stated, ‘membership requires that a candidate country has achieved stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law, human rights, and the respect of and protection of minorities’. It is in particular against these criteria that the Commission will assess Turkey's progress towards accession in its next Regular Report.

---
II 

Calendar No. 139 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1698 

To exclude payments from State eugenics compensation programs from consideration in determining eligibility for, or the amount of, Federal public 

benefits. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 25, 2015 

Mr. TILLIS (for himself, Mr. CARPER, Mr. BURR, Mr. KAINE, and Mr. 

WARNER) introduced the following bill; which was read the first time 

JULY 7, 2015 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To exclude payments from State eugenics compensation programs from consideration in determining eligibility for, 

or the amount of, Federal public benefits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Treatment of Certain 

5 Payments in Eugenics Compensation Act’’. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1698 PCS

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF PAYMENTS FROM STATE EUGENICS 

2 COMPENSATION PROGRAMS FROM CONSID3 ERATION IN DETERMINING ELIGIBILITY FOR, 

4 OR THE AMOUNT OF, FEDERAL PUBLIC BENE5 FITS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi7 sion of law, payments made under a State eugenics com8 pensation program shall not be considered as income or 

9 resources in determining eligibility for, or the amount of, 

10 any Federal public benefit. 

11 (b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section: 

12 (1) FEDERAL PUBLIC BENEFIT.—The term 

13 ‘‘Federal public benefit’’ means— 

14 (A) any grant, contract, loan, professional 

15 license, or commercial license provided by an 

16 agency of the United States or by appropriated 

17 funds of the United States; and 

18 (B) any retirement, welfare, health, dis19 ability, public or assisted housing, postsec20 ondary education, food assistance, unemploy21 ment benefit, or any other similar benefit for 

22 which payments or assistance are provided to 

23 an individual, household, or family eligibility 

24 unit by an agency of the United States or by 

25 appropriated funds of the United States. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1698 PCS

1 (2) STATE EUGENICS COMPENSATION PRO2 GRAM.—The term ‘‘State eugenics compensation 

3 program’’ means a program established by State law 

4 that is intended to compensate individuals who were 

5 sterilized under the authority of the State. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 139 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1698 

A BILL 

To exclude payments from State eugenics compublic benefits. mining eligibility for, or the amount of, Federal pensation programs from consideration in deterJULY 7, 2015 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATIONS
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
  /s/ Michael J. RockenbachMichael J. RockenbachExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<CIK>                         0000887919
<NAME>                        Premier Financial Bancorp, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-2000
<CASH>                                         23,339
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         737
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               21,087
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    176,494
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         17,906
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           18,249
<LOANS>                                        595,576
<ALLOWANCE>                                    7,821
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 889,932
<DEPOSITS>                                     728,412
<SHORT-TERM>                                   51,374
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            5,700
<LONG-TERM>                                    48,616
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,103
<OTHER-SE>                                     54,727
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 889,932
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                56,245
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              11,524
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               1,465
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               69,234
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             32,503
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             40,558
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          28,676
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  4,932
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (279)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                26,105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,651
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1,335
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,335
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .26
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 3.68 <F1>
<LOANS-NON>                                    7,840
<LOANS-PAST>                                   2,196
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               689
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               6,812
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  4,382
<RECOVERIES>                                   459
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              7,821
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           7,821
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0
<FN>
<F1>Computed as tax-equivalent basis
</FN>



</TABLE>
----

(2004/C 78 E/0693)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3827/03

by Ilda Figueiredo (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(12 December 2003)

Subject:   Funding for the network of Carrefours and Info-Points

The European network of Carrefours and Info-Points Europe recently publicly protested at the decision of the Directorate-General for Press and Communication of 29 September to cancel the annual allocation of EUR 20 000 for Carrefours and Info-Points Europe and its proposal merely to maintain collaboration in distributing documentation, training and running helpdesks. They complained that this ‘unilateral decision, taken without any consultation and at such short notice’ would affect the budget and activities of all the structures involved.

Can the Commission therefore say what measures it is considering in order to take account of the commitments already made by these organisations, bearing in mind the promise that funding would be maintained until the end of 2004?

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(3 February 2004)

The Commission would refer the Honourable Member to its answer to written E-3007/03 by Mr Santini (1)

----

(1)  See page 448.

----
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance





Exhibit 10.1




UAL CORPORATION

SUCCESS SHARING PROGRAM —

PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN

AMENDMENT NO. 2




This Amendment No. 2 to the UAL Corporation Success Sharing Program — Performance Incentive
Plan dated January 1, 2007 (the “Plan”), is made as of January 1, 2009.



WHEREAS, pursuant to Section VI.A of the Plan, the Plan may be modified or amended by the
Board of Directors (the “Board”); and



WHEREAS, final regulations have been issued under Section 409A, which are effective as of
January 1, 2009, and the Board wishes to comply with such regulations and the related transition
guidance by amending the Plan effective as of, January 1, 2009;



NOW THEREFORE, Section IV.B of the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of January 1, 2009, by
adding the following sentence at the end thereof:




“Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision in the Plan to the contrary, (i)
payment of annual Incentive Awards and quarterly Incentive Awards earned over the fourth
quarter of a calendar year shall be made in the year following the year in which such
Incentive Award was earned; and (ii) payment of quarterly Incentive Awards earned over the
first through third quarter of a calendar year shall be made no later than 21/2 months
following the end of the year in which such Incentive Award was earned.”



* * *




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 2 to the UAL Corporation Success Sharing Program —
Performance Incentive Plan is executed on this 26th day of September, 2008.



	 	 	 
	Paul R. Lovejoy 

Name

	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary 

Title

	 	 
	 
	 	 
	/s/ Paul R. Lovejoy 

Signature
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASIITNGTON, DC

The Flight Shop, Inc. D/B/A/Professional Air and Aero Facilities, LLC Complainants 

### v. City ofBend, Oregon Municipal Airport Respondent Docket No. 16-14-12

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME
This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based onthe abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance withFAA Rules of Practicefor Federally-Assisted AirportEnforcementProceedings, 14 CFR, Part 16. Pursuantto 14 CFRPart 16, subpart B, the date bywhichthe Director's Determination will be issued inthis matter is hereby extended to March 14 2016. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case. 

# !d.Uz/lr I I Date ryon K. Huffman, Acting Director Airport Compliance and ManagementAnalysisCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFYthat on December



# ~ , 2015, I caused to be placed in the United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy ofthe Notice ofExtension of Time to March 14, 2016 for FAADocket 16-14-12 addressed to: Counsel for Complainant Leonard D. Kirsch, Esq. McBreen & Kopko 500 North Broadway Jericho, NY 11753 Email: lkirsch@mklawnvc.com Martin E. Hansen, Esq. Francis, Hansen & Martin LLP 1148 NW Hill Street Bend, Oregon 97701 Email: mch(wJrancishansen.com Counsel for Respondent Pablo 0. Niiesch Katherine M. Mapes Jessica R. Bell Spiegel & McDiarmid LLP 1875 Eye Street, N.W. Suite 700 Washington, DC 20006 Email: pablo.nuesch(?llspiegeltncd.com Copy to: FAAPart 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAA Airports Compliance Division, AC0-100



# eRJu,R~

Claudia Roberts Office ofAirport Compliance

and Management Analysis
Exhibit 23.9

Consent of Philip Bridson

I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of North American Palladium Ltd., which is being filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission, of references to my name and references to my involvement in the preparation of Technical Report for Lac des Iles Mine, Ontario, Incorporating Prefeasibility Study for Life of Mine Plan (effective
date of March 21, 2014) included in the 2013 Annual Information Form of North American Palladium Ltd., dated March 31, 2014 (the AIF).

I also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-13766) and in the Registration
Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-185656) of the references to my name and the above-mentioned information in the AIF.

Dated this
31st day of March, 2014.



|     |  |                           
|---- |  | --------------------------
|     | 
|Per: |  | /s/ Philip Bridson, P.Eng.
|     |  | Philip Bridson, P.Eng.    
|     |  | Senior Mining Engineer    
|     |  | Tetra Tech WEI Inc.