alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-25-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-25-1996
<CASH>                                          11,862
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,914
<ALLOWANCES>                                       173
<INVENTORY>                                     26,774
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,269
<PP&E>                                          53,114
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,370
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 110,118
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,782
<BONDS>                                         29,321
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,211
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,640
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   110,118
<SALES>                                         21,370
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,455
<CGS>                                           14,941
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,272
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 544
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,698
<INCOME-TAX>                                       645
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,053
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,053
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
#### Bouchier, Respondent, vs. Hammer, Appellant.

*March 18*

April *26, 1910.*

*Appeal: Costs: Taxation after record remitted: Jurisdiction.*

Costs may be taxed in the supreme court after the record in the case has been remitted to the trial court, no time limit being placed by statute on such taxation, and no modification of the judgment being involved therein.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Price county: JOHN K. Pabish, Circuit Judge.

This is a motion by the respondent to review and set aside the taxation of costs by the clerk of the supreme court.

*528
      *G. F. Lamb,*fox tbe respondent, in support of tbe motion.

*John*Morgan, for tbe appellant, *contra.*

Pee Cueiam.

Judgment of reversal having been rendered in tbe action November 12, 1909 [140 Wis. 648], and tbe record remitted to tbe trial court December 80tb following, costs in tbis court were not taxed until March 5, 1910. Tbe respondent appeared before the clerk at tbe taxation and objected to tbe taxation of any costs because the court bad no jurisdiction. Tbe objection being overruled and tbe costs taxed, a motion to review and set aside tire taxation is now made in tbis court.

We are satisfied that tbe taxation was proper. The statute places no time limit upon tbe taxation of costs in tbis court. They are to be taxed and inserted in tbe entry of' judgment on four days’ notice, in accordance with tbe order of the court. Sec. 2952, Stats. (1898). Execution is to issue on tbe judgment out of tbis court, and satisfaction is to-be entered by tbe clerk of tbis court. Sec. 2953, Stats. (1898). .After tbe record has been regularly transmitted to-tbe trial court tbis court has no power to vacate or modify tbe judgment in any way, because its jurisdiction for such purposes is at an end. *Ott v. Boring,*131 Wis. 472, 110 N. W. 824, 111 N. W. 833. Tbe taxation and entry of costs, however, does not affect or modify tbe judgment rendered, but simply is a clerical act which reduces to concrete figures-tbe abstract command of tbe judgment already entered. Inasmuch as tbe judgment for costs must be enforced by process from tbis court and must be satisfied here, tbis court must necessarily retain power to do sucb acts pertaining to the-enforcement, satisfaction, and discharge of tbe judgment as become necessary for tbe due protection of tbe parties-. No-other court has power to do these acts and certainly tbe power must be lodged somewhere. Tbis court has offset two judgments rendered by it, though tbe records bad been long. *529previously transmitted to the trial court. *Yorton v. M., L. S. & W. R. Co.*62 Wis. 367, 374, 21 N. W. 516, 23 N. W. 401.

We conclude that the taxation of costs was properly made, and the motion is denied with $10 costs.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

WAG ACQUISITION, LLC

, Appellant

v.

WEBPOWER, INC., FRIE NDFINDER NETWORKS INC., STREAMRAY INC. , WMM, LLC, WMM HOLDINGS, LLC, MULTI MEDIA, LLC, DUODECA D

IT SERVICES LUXEMBOU RG S.A.R.L., ACCRETI VE

TECHNOLOGY GROUP, IN C., ICF TECHNOLOGY, INC., RISER APPS LLC

, Appellees

______________________

2018

- 1619

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016

- 01239.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

R ONALD A BRAMSON

, Liston Abramson LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by A RI J ASON
J AFFESS

.

J ONATHAN L. F ALKLER

, Venable LLP, Washington, DC,argued for all appellees. Appellees WebPower, Inc., FriendFinder Networks Inc., Streamray Inc., W MM, LLC, WMM Holdings, LLC, Multi Media, LLC also represented by F RANK M. G ASPARO

, T ODD M. N OSHER , New York, NY.

K EVIN M ICHAEL O'B RIEN , Baker & McKenzie LLP,Washington, DC, for appellee Duodecad IT Services Luxembourg S.A.R.L.

B RIAN G. B ODINE , Lane Powell PC, Seattle, WA, for appellees Accretive Technology Group, Inc., ICF Technology, Inc., Riser Apps LLC. Also represented by A LAN D. M INSK

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN

, C HEN

, and S TOLL

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

August 26, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court
# CE2004078EN.01067301.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/673 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/673

---

(2004/C 78 E/0716)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3913/03

by Ole Krarup (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(17 December 2003)

Subject:   Oil extraction agreement: granting of authorisations

Subject:

Does the Commission consider that the Danish government's agreement with A.P. Møller and the Dansk Undergrund Consortium on the conditions for oil extraction over the next 40 years in the North Sea meets the requirement that authorisations ‘shall be granted on the basis of objective and non-discriminatory principles’ (Article 13 of Directive 94/22/EC (1) on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons)? If so, is it aware of any examples of comparable concession conditions?

1

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(6 February 2004)

(6 February 2004)

The Commission has asked the Member State concerned for information regarding the facts raised to by the Honourable Member. It will inform him of its findings.

---

(1)  OJ L 164, 30.6.1994, p. 3.

1

---
Amendment No.2 to Acuity Brands, Inc 2002 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan




 Exhibit 10(iii)A(87) 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 
 TO 
 ACUITY
BRANDS, INC. 
 2002 SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN 
 (As Amended And Restated Effective As Of January 1, 2005) 
 THIS AMENDMENT made as of this 24th day of October, 2008, by ACUITY BRANDS,
INC. (the “Company”); 
 W I T N E S S E T H: 
 WHEREAS, the Company established the Acuity Brands, Inc. 2002 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, which Plan was amended and restated generally effective as of
January 1, 2005 (the “Plan”), subject to the transition rules of Section 409A; 
 WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Plan
in the manner hereinafter provided; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, as follows: 
 1. 
 Section 3.7 is hereby amended by deleting the present section in its entirety and substituting
the following in lieu thereof: 
 “3.7 Form of Payment of Accrued Benefit: The form of benefit payment shall be a monthly benefit payable
for 180 months. If a Participant receiving benefit payments dies before 180 monthly benefit payments have been made, benefit payments shall be continued to the Participant’s Beneficiary until the sum of monthly payments to both the Participant
and his Beneficiary is 180. If the Participant’s Beneficiary dies before a total of 180 payments have been made, the remaining payments shall be made to the Participant’s estate or the Beneficiary’s estate, as indicated by the
Participant on the designation of beneficiary form provided by the Administrator. Notwithstanding any provision in the Plan to the contrary, the Administrator may, in its sole discretion, with respect to the Participant’s
Pre-Section 409A Benefit elect to offer additional payment options for benefits under the Plan or the Administrator may elect to accelerate the time and manner of payment of any benefits (including payment of a lump sum), including any
death benefits, payable under the Plan, provided that any such alternative form of benefit payment shall be substantially equivalent (using the Actuarial Equivalent factors in Section 1.1(c)) to the normal form of benefit payment provided for
in this Section 3.7. 
 Notwithstanding the other provisions of this Article III, in the event a Participant who is a “key employee” (as
determined by the Administrator in accordance with rules established by the Administrator under Section 409A) becomes entitled to payments under this Article III of his Section 409A Benefit, payments of such benefit shall not commence
until 6 months after such Participant separates from service (unless otherwise permitted by Section 409A) and on such 









 
date the payments that would have been made during such six-month period shall be made in a lump sum.” 
 2. 
 This Amendment No. 2 shall be effective as of October 24, 2008. Except as hereby modified,
the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Amendment No. 2 as of the date first written
above. 
  
  

			
	ACUITY BRANDS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/S/  VERNON J. NAGEL
		 	 Vernon J. Nagel
 Chairman, President, and
 Chief Executive Officer



  

 2
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));      and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of, and for, the periods presented in the  Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: February      9, 2009 |   By:  |  /s/      William W. Priest   |
|----------------------------------|-----------------------|------------------------------------|
|                             |                  | William      W. Priest             |
|                             |                  | Chief      Executive Officer       |
|                             |                  | (Principal      Executive Officer) |

| Date:      February 9, 2009 |   By: |  /s/      Adam Borak                         |
|-----------------------------|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                        |            | Adam      Borak                                   |
|                        |            | Chief      Financial Officer                      |
|                        |            | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer) |

----
Doc ID: 2770450
Doc ID: 2770450
Doc ID: 2770450
Doc ID: 2770450
Doc ID: 2770450
Doc ID: 2770450
Doc ID: 2770450
Doc ID: 2770450
Doc ID: 2770450
Doc ID: 2770450
Doc ID: 2770450
Doc ID: 2770450
Doc ID: 2770450
Doc ID: 2770450
Doc ID: 2770450
Doc ID: 2770450
Doc ID: 2770450
Doc ID: 2770450
Doc ID: 2770450
Doc ID: 2770450
# C_2005135EN.01000301.xml

| 2.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/3774 — Pirelli/DB Real Estate/Investitori Associati/La Rinascente-UPIM)

(2005/C 135/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 27 April 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in Italian and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3774. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3774. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on the agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within twelve days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    . Copies of the agreements are available through the Commission's Web site (                    *www.fmc.gov*)                           ( print page 11674)                        or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202)-523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:*                     011905-001.                

*Title:*                     K-Line/CSAV Car Carrier Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     Compania Sud Americana de Vapores and Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.                

*Filing Party:*                     John P. Meade, Esq.; General Counsel; K- Line America, Inc.; 6199 Bethlehem Road; Preston, MD 21655.                

*Synopsis:*                     The amendment updates the address for CSAV and adds Mexico to the geographic scope.                

*Agreement No.:*                     012208-001.                

*Title:*                     Hoegh/Grimaldi Space Charter Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     Hoegh Autoliners AS and Grimaldi Deep Sea S.p.A.                

*Filing Party:*                     Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Cozen O'Connor; 1627 I Street NW., Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20006.                

*Synopsis:*                     The Amendment changes the name of Industria Armamento Meridionale S.P.A. to Grimaldi Deep Sea S.p.A., adds the trade from Baltimore to Antwerp to the geographic scope of the Agreement, and restates the Agreement accordingly.                

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Dated: February 26, 2015.

Karen V. Gregory, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-04428 Filed 3-3-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
99-1120.

#### State ex rel. Israfil v. Montgomery Cty. Common Pleas Court Judge Gowdown.

In Mandamus. On motion 'to dismiss or, in the alternative, motion for summary judgment. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Dodglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
 
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement of
Summit Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form S-8 of our report dated March
17, 1999 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory
paragraph relating to a change in accounting principle described in Note 2 to
the consolidated financial statements), appearing in the Annual Report on Form
10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 1998.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
May 18, 1999
# Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report of AVAX Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard P. Rainey, President (as such, the
principal executive officer and principal accounting officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/   Richard P. Rainey

---

---
USCIB: 13.6/18 

REF ID:A65895 

TO:P SECRET 

24 

21 April 1954 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Courier Routes for Translll.:Lssion of COMINT Over the 

Territory o:t "Third Party" Countries. 

1. Pursuant to existing arrangements for mutual notification of 

subject routes, action has b.een taken to inf'orm I I COMINT authorities of' existing USCIB-approvedroutes f'or transmission of' COMINT over 

the territory of "Third.Party" countries. 

2. In reply to a request by the Executive SecretarY !or information concerning approval of any such routes by I I authorities, the 

Chairman, D has notified .us as follows: 

1

1 ~is transmitting no CCMINT material through or over 

the territory of' f'oreign nations and would plan to do so only 

in exceptional circumstances. In case of such exceptional 

circumstances, notification will be sent to USCIB of any route 

approved for this purpose." 

USCIB: 13.6/18
# CE2004084EN.01035601.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/356 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/356

---

(2004/C 84 E/0414)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0298/04

by Bob van den Bos (ELDR) to the Commission

(6 February 2004)

Subject:   Relations between the EU and Libya and human rights in Libya

Subject:

Libya is doing its utmost to become reintegrated into the international community. In September 2003, the UN sanctions against Libya were lifted. In recent years there has been a rapprochement between the EU and President Gaddafi. The President of the Commission, Mr Prodi, says that by means of his talks with the President he wishes to improve these mutual relations. On 30 December 2003, he invited Libya to join the Barcelona process, in response to which Colonel Gaddafi stated that he was prepared to consider full participation in the process. At present, consideration is also being given to concluding a fisheries agreement with Libya.

To what extent does the human right rights situation play a part in the European Union's attitude towards Libya? Are human rights a topic for discussion in relations between the Commission and the government in Tripoli?

What is the Commission's view of the human rights situation in Libya? Does it believe that the situation has improved?

Will the Commission lend its good offices to facilitate an application for permission for a delegation representing independent human rights organisations to visit Libya to review the human rights situation there?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(15 March 2004)

(15 March 2004)

There are currently no official relations between the EU and Libya, which has been a passive observer in the Barcelona process since 1999.

The EU hopes that Libya can become a fully-fledged member of the Barcelona process, which it could only join on an unconditional basis and by accepting all its acquis.

This would make it possible to enter into dialogue with Libya on all matters of interest, including human rights.

As things stand, in the absence of any official relations with Libya, human rights issues are dealt with in an ad hoc way.

Lastly, Amnesty International has just made a visit to Libya, where it had been denied entry since 1988. The Commission views this as a positive development.

---
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00404-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF STEVEN STAVRON,

DECEASED

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from Probate Court No. 1

of Tarrant County (2013-PR00606-1-C)

November 10, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed. 

It is further ordered that each party shall pay its own costs of this appeal, for 

which let execution issue. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack