alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
J..11'. • .f. :Jrieu.ri.an 

REF ID:A65909 

e • 

"Oo3ll _ aci.:ic Coast • ir rrr•r;:i:7 

l~L.ou, C l!.f orn:i a 

::!_,') iebruary 19)2. 

•.me 1 .?ore es ::;.ecnri t;r ~ ency 

,31..1-'l .L 1ebrasl Q rtVenue 

.~s l.l~ton 2~, ..J• c • 

.-e.:i.r -.I'. rrie .. nan: 

I i:.oo ha.Q ::J..u, an this -<>s L•-ck:e' rrry plans back a bit. !.!'le plans 

were furi:.her set .JdC',. 'J",,r t ie f.-..ct vHat norneoo:Jy :i..n "a< 1in~-ton aecided 

t lc:l.t. lie lr1P-T 1,1 re .·oout . at. Captd.l.Il •lCcker <>n' 1 '•d.llted. in J:'t...'11. 

.:'rancisco ·01an ·Fe 1 b.d, anoi::ne>r .J.<-Y slt1 t ,.,.et tin-::- t e 'i.k1.t.ter stra.ir.ntel'led 

' t. 

1J.T,n ;:.11 i:.nis, I _1ave ::-::t !1acK nw 'iepart 1r'3 ::or t~e oast nt:i.1 ,_ ·-~ . ..I. uTln..d.y : !...:J.rCn. 1 1nless :ro ..r epcrt.nre 1~ J.el2.:,.-ed, 1 -"!:' ::wt. J.rr:t..ve c~ """"" 

intL c.I'ter :'.:-ou .3.-re left. I s..,J.11. c.::>J _ 7,-ur ..:'fJ..ce ()n 1:01"' 'JE'J II> ,., I' A 

3 arch .di cc.se ;,-o 1 c~rn 1..0 1 eave .. nesse..;c t.11e ~e :!:or ""..t'. If t'lere s.,..,~ ... J,11..,.") 

1.'-3 ony 11rgent. llJ.l'>SS&f"e ~r~u \fC.nt -o 11.:;•1ye1, ;J"O 'iJ.(l'ht QSI.{ ::le to velep•l0Il0 / 

you :;.t ::Jro~ks "'-J.r _""orce •lase, leavine- ~.ie s me 'u..nt as to .m~ t~ hnd 

~r.,.u.. ,_,111ce 'Te are noi:. l art, or' rne i.,avul Cof!tl!iJmc3.t1 .:...s ervice, 

lonr c.s c.ance te_ eyhorie C""lls co1.e fr:i.:i.r _y f>asily cr..-1 <:re c.1e.!lfer 

'v ...m ! ro1 1fe~1 i..r rry. 

I •lave .S.Sl<:ed lt'. '...1.nd. -1.ees "''- zo1 

'.2-X",ell. :r suspect t,_:c.1, :::: 1"' d'.Ll 

11.i'ficulty, out she •a;r c:ill 70 

or s0t.,eth:J.nc- o.L na"G <>ort. 

scne sn1't- ,,f cl"'e..ri::.nce fo.L' ie at 

oe ... b ~ l o br:LllP' J r off -'1. t~ out. 

2~ ns1" for th'? i:.:. i:.le oi' ye> rt alk 

lmless so•ietnJ.'1• sto1_,s •e, I exrect to ::Q' ~lO'"'Il f'i,01'1 ius •iricL-on an 

9 1.arch. I ~J:ial _ 'eave J.n t e morro.ni:; cJ.nd :irrive ab : 011tE ome!".f :i..n 

tne Par~v di1ernocn (on ..::.Ustern .'U.rlines :lJ.Eht 151 at 1441 i.nless 

tney 1a.ve c'1d.n~e 1 the> "'cr-eaule). I ewect t:) see the I 0;istics l-eople 

t'lere Donet:L.iile on l uesda.y 11 !i:>rcn, i1ut, u••.::i.teve.4 ti..,...e 'i' m.ine i::.. 

'tseful i: you t"lere :i..s yrinrs. 

I am r;o_TY' "vhat ./ _.u \,.., 11t be at nur !'leet.ing t:ie rrecedin~ -eel{, •Jut 

i look :orward t,o SE>e1nr; y J. at ! a::-:\rell. L"" s..Ire t r st eriot1£11 to 

r;et OVPr yo .r J..'lu bef re you •...to rue i_.raveLing, t te two ll!'e not 

c •11lfortaole tocetl1er, I •ave .. ound • 

...J...ncerely, 

CZAf!J /~/~s-

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 04-15-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 17

- 00201

- CR

ANITA YVETTE SMITH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016

- 2476

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Anita Yvette Smith has filed a motion to dismiss th is appeal. As authorized by

Rule 42.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure , we grant the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.2(a).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Ralph K. Burgess

Justice

Date Submitted: October 24, 2017

Date Decided: October 25, 2017

Do Not Publish
EXHIBIT 11.1

BAIRNCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 2002 AND SEPTEMBER 29, 2001

(Unaudited)

			 
2002
2001
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:     
Net income (loss)
$  1,084,000
$ (3,311,000)
Average common shares outstanding
7,334,000
7,328,000  
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
$           0.15
$          (0.45)   
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:     
Net income (loss)
$  1,084,000
$ (3,311,000)
Average common shares outstanding
7,334,000
7,328,000  
Common shares issuable in respect to options issued      to employees with a dilutive effect
9,000
--
Total diluted common shares outstanding
7,343,000
7,328,000
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
$           0.15
$          (0.45)  

 

EXHIBIT 11.2

BAIRNCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 2002 AND SEPTEMBER 29, 2001

(Unaudited)

			 
2002
2001
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:     
Net income (loss)
$  2,989,000
$  (1,271,000)
Average common shares outstanding
7,331,000
7,318,000  
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
$           0.41
$           (0.17)   
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:     
Net income (loss)
$  2,989,000
$  (1,271,000)
Average common shares outstanding
7,331,000
7,318,000  
Common shares issuable in respect to options issued to             employees with a dilutive effect
6,000
--
Total diluted common shares outstanding
7,337,000
7,318,000  
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
$           0.41
$           (0.17)
.-,. REF ID:A2753..kCJ
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of
North American Palladium Ltd.

We consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of:



| |  |  | our Independent Auditors Report dated February 21, 2013 on the consolidated financial statements of North American Palladium Ltd. comprising
the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, shareholders equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2012 and
December 31, 2011, and notes comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated February 21, 2013 on the consolidated balance sheets of North American Palladium
Ltd. as at December 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011 and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, shareholders equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31,
2011
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting dated February 21, 2013 on North American
Palladium Ltd.s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

each of which is contained in
or incorporated by reference in this annual report on Form 40-F of North American Palladium Ltd. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

We also consent to the Incorporation by reference of such reports in the Registration Statements on Form F-10 (File No. 333-185656) and Form S-8 (File No. 383-13766).



LOGO

Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants

Toronto, Canada

March 20, 2013
Letter, dated August 19, 2008, to Daniel Yost



 Exhibit 10.25 
  

			
	August 19, 2008	 	



 Charles Daniel Yost 
 1801 California Street 
 Denver, CO 80202 
 Dear Dan:

 Giving people the opportunity to develop professionally through new challenges is an investment in our greatest resource – employees. Fostering and
developing the talent of employees is critical to the success of the business and to our future. With that, I am pleased to offer you the position of Executive Vice President, Mass Markets, reporting directly to me, effective August 19, 2008. I am
confident of the value you will continue to bring to the business. The key compensation opportunities of your new role are highlighted below. 
  

	1.	Base Salary: Your base salary increases to $500,000 per annum. 

  

	2.	Annual Bonus Plan: You will be eligible to participate in the annual bonus plan. Your target bonus will remain at 100% of your annual base pay. 

  

	3.	Executive Perquisite: You will continue receive an executive perquisite benefit of $35,000 paid to you annually in January. 

  

	 4.
	 Background Check: As a condition of this internal transfer, you must undergo and pass a background check at this
time. Please complete and return the enclosed Request for Information and Consent and Disclosure forms within 5 business days of your receipt of this letter to Jana Venus at 1801 California Street, 23rd Floor, Denver, CO 80202. You will not be contacted as to the results of the background check unless there is a problem. 


  

	5.	Other: Your executive benefits and the other terms and conditions of your employment shall continue to be governed by your agreement with the company dated June 28, 2004 and
amended on December 15, 2005. 

 Congratulations on this wonderful opportunity, Dan. I look forward to your continued strong performance and
the contribution you will make to the success of Qwest. 
 Sincerely, 
 

 
 Thomas E. Richards 
 Executive Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer
McNamara: ...the PT Boat Personnel and the intelligence reports of the 

interrogation, one of which reports Fulbright has, state that the PT Boat 

commander who gave a very detailed account of what happened on the 

2nd of August states categorically that no PT Boats could have 

participated in an attack on the 4th, the second attack. Now he admits 

that Swatow boats might have participated, although the way the 

intelligence report came in, it indicates that if they had he probably would 

have known of that too. So we got a bit of a problem there, but I’m going 

to try to meet it head on and just say that he didn’t know anything about 

Swatows and we knew Swatows were in and we had some other evidence 

of PT Boats. 

I’ve included in my statement the information we got from communications 

intelligence reports and I simply identified it as highly classified intelligence 

from an unimpeachable source. We’ve just got to say it because it’s the 

best evidence we have that an attack took place on the 4th. 

Johnson: Hmm. Now what is it, we heard them say it? 

McNamara: We— No, we got several message— Yes, we, we actually 

received the message and decoded it at the time and we had three 

messages. One said that an attack was planned; we got that before the 

attack took place, and I informed you of that at 9 o’clock in the morning the 

day of the attack. A second message said that the attack was taking 

place and then a third message said that two boats were destroyed, their 

boats. 

 

Johnson: What time was this now, the other two messages? 

McNamara: Well they came in, they came in— 

Johnson: During the day? 

McNamara: Yeah, before the, before the execute order went out. 

Johnson: Hmm, and when did it go out, that night? 

McNamara: Yeah, the execute order, well it went out, Sort of over a 

period of time such as from 5 o’clock PM to about 7 PM. 

Johnson: But weren’t they urging us to move faster really than we did 

move? 

McNamara: No, I don’t think so. But uh, there was a lot of doubt in the 

afternoon as to whether it took place and we went back and forth and did 
they have evidence or didn’t they have evidence. And the record is pretty 

clear that by the time the execute order was finally released, everybody 

signed on that an attack had taken place. 

Johnson: Well as I remembered it, I haven’t looked at my diary, but as I 

remembered it, they gave us a statement and asked us to make it from out 

there and we held it back for some time and— 

McNamara: No, I don’t think so, Mr. President, I went over all of it 

yesterday and I don’t see any evidence of that. 

Johnson: What day is this? 

McNamara: The day is August 4th, which was a Tuesday, August 4th. 

Johnson: Okay, alright you take the [inaudible] 

McNamara: Yes, Sir.
REF ID:A72023 

l December 1952 

SUEJECT: Executive Secretary for SCAMP in 1953 

1. On 12 November 1 Dr. H. H. Campaigne and the undersigned 

diacuaaed w1 th Dr, J. H. Curtiaa of the National Bureau of Standards 1 

various aspects or' SCAMP 1953, including the designation of .an 

executive secretary with such duties as 

a. Representing the UCLA, aa well as the INA, and making 

arrangements for apace 

b. Conducting financial negotiations with prospective 

participants, on the basis of salaries to be determined 

in consultation with the chairman of SCAMP. 

c. Supervising the reproduction of reports 1 including a 

preliminary expoeitory report for the information of 

prospective pal'-ticipanta9 

d. Scheduli:cg meetings and arranging for the tak:Lug of 

notes 

2. Assistant Profeasor Lowell Paige of the UCLA Mathematica 

Department has been selected as executive secretary and has started 

to fulfill the present duties under a part-time Civil Service 

appointment. He participated in SCAMP 1952 and has, I believe, subm1 tted the neceaaary papers for full clearance. In the meantime 1 

his duties require no clearance beyond what he had for SCAMP 1952. 

~~-~a~-- sTEWART S. CAIBNS 

Chairman of SO.AMP 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 02-12-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
EXHIBIT
32











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Premier Financial Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Robert W. Walker and Brien M. Chase, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our
knowledge:





o
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and





o
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








By:  /s/
Robert W. Walker


---------------------------------------


Robert
W. Walker


President
and Chief Executive Officer








By:  /s/
Brien M. Chase


---------------------------------------


Brien
M. Chase


Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





Date: March 27, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              This schedule contains summary financial
                              information extracted from the Consolidated
                              Statements of Income, Cash Flows and Partners'
                              Capital for the three years ended December 31,
                              1998 and the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
                              December 31, 1998 and 1997 and the Notes thereto,
                              for Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. and
                              subsidiaries and is qualified in its entirety by
                              reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001073986
<NAME>                        Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "C"
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
From: <Kyrik.Rombough@state.sd.us>

To: Gail Fallon/R8/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: <Rick.Boddicker@state.sd.us>, <Brian.Gustafson@stat e.sd.us> Date: 03/20/2012 08:35 AM Subject: Regional Haze Information

Gail:

As discussed, I have attached the NOx BACT applicat ion portion for GCC Dacotah’s PSD permit. In addition, I have attached an excel spreadsheet with the actual NOx emissions as identified by the Continuous Emission Monitoring System.

If you are considering calculating a $ per ton rati ng for specific control equipment, there a several things I think you may want to keep in mind.

1) GCC Dacotah’s Kiln #6 system has three emission points, the alkali bypass, the coal mill and the m ain kiln stack. The spreadsheet does not break the emi ssions down into each stack. Where and when the exhaust gases are removed from the kiln will impact the number and feasibility of any add on controls.

2) The RBLC notes the NOx emission limits for kiln s associated with an SNCR with a range from 1.95 pounds per ton clinker to 8 pounds per ton clinker. Continental Cement – 8.0 lb/ton, Lehigh Cement – 2.85 lb/ton, Florida Rock – 1.95 lb/ton, Houston Am erican – 1.95 lb/ton, Cemex – 1.95 lb/ton. The thr ee plants with the lowest emission rates are for a new kiln system and not a retrofit. I don’t believe y ou can expect a retrofit system to meet what a brand n ew system would meet.

3) In considering the amount of emission reduction s that an SNCR might achieve, multiplying by a 50% reduction or some other arbitrary number may not be appropriate. GCC Dacotah’s average emission rate based on a 12-month basis has averaged between 2.6 and 3.6 lbs/ton clinker. Comparing GCC Dacotah’s actual emission rate compared to recent B ACT limits, an SNCR may not achieve any or little

reductions.

4) In the case of Regional Haze, the rule is desig ned to improve visibility. Even though one may con sider the cost on a dollar per ton reasonable, the questi on still remains is there any perceptible improveme nt in visibility. Our major NOx impacts to our Class I areas occur from outside South Dakota. From Sout h Dakota, our major NOx impacts are due to mobile, th en followed by natural fires. The emphasis placed on such a small contributing source compared to the larger identified sources is not in context with t he State’s Right in designing how it will meet the req uirements of the Regional Haze program.

Kyrik

Kyrik Rombough Engineering Manager I 523 East Capitol Pierre, SD 5750128.1101-PSD_model_NOX and CO_20020117.pdf

Kiln #6 NOx Rate.xlsx
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,259,052               5,117,591
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,413,289               6,639,914
<ALLOWANCES>                                   487,073                 422,461
<INVENTORY>                                  2,011,410                 961,823
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,527,319              12,610,001
<PP&E>                                       2,100,418               2,249,141
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,109,237               1,433,114
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,506,326              13,559,439
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,775,699               8,037,217
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                     77,346                 118,775
<COMMON>                                        11,656                  12,532
<OTHER-SE>                                     299,211               5,180,751
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,506,326              13,559,439
<SALES>                                     11,299,756               9,793,624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,594,167              11,369,401
<CGS>                                        7,223,230               4,698,982
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,558,078              12,376,492
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,432                  81,767
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             105,611                  68,518
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,112,954)             (1,157,376)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.88)                  (1.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.88)                  (1.03)










</TABLE>