alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
REF ID :A275220-_ .. 

19 September 1945 

Dear John 1 

.At'ter a aomevbat lengthJ', but not unpleasant., au trip, I arrived home aaf"•lJ' la•t l'rid&J' aol'ning. We atarted of"!' 

trom Prettvtek to go to Iceland, but bad to turn back Vhen 

•ore tbaii bill.t n7 there on account of" 1.Jllproper landing cond1t1ona. Then ye l•tt Preatvick again, af'ter a briet reat, 

tor the Asorea vhteh va• quit• a long hop ot twelve houra. 

We apen~ a f'•v hours there and then took otf' f'or Bermuda 

which•• uoth•J;" long hop of' about twelve hOUl."e. P1Mll7, &rte~ a •hort interval., v• journeJ'9d to llev York just ahead ~ tbe bean atol"ll. I arrived there in the earl7 hours ot 

PridaJ morning and took a train to Washington. 

l tourid Barbara home, but not John-·h• having been 

unable_ to get a furlough. Bl1zebeth ia 1noapa.c1tated aa 

& reault ot having broken a couple toes running into a leg 

of" a cba1r in tbe dark. She bobbl•• about on, crutches. 

Ye are 1J,1 the Jaid.at of" reorp.nization and I imagine that 

thing• Yill aettle down to & more even keel within a couple 

or •ontb.•· 

I preauae that 7our trip vith Travis ia etill on and 

I Vill look torv&rd to aeeiDg J'OU 1n October. 

I tur~ed over the pair or •ho•• to Albert 8ma.ll and he 

vill take care or the matter. 

llith -.n.7 th&nka tor various courtea1ea and cordial 

greetings to Jira. '1'1ltman. and 7our daughter. I am, 

81ncerel7 7oura. 

William F. Friedman. 

Brigadier John B. '1'1ltm.n 

GO I: OS 

London, England 

eclassified and a roved for release b NSA on 07-16-2014
Exhibit 32B

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AutoInfo, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
Wunderlich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company. A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.


/s/ William Wunderlich
----------------------
William Wunderlich
Chief Financial Officer
August 10, 2005

                                       20
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-30201 Summary Calendar

LEONARD HEBRARD, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus ED C. DAY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CV-1647-K

-------------------- August 21, 2000 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Leonard Hebrard (Hebrard), Louisiana prisoner #106664, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Hebrard argues that the district court erred in calculating the one-year limitations period of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1) because it did not take into account the fact that Louisiana prisoners have three years to seek postconviction relief under La. Code of Crim. Proc. Ann.
art. 930.8. Hebrard has not shown that the district court erred inNo. 00-30201 -2- dismissing his § 2254 petition as time-barred. Because his conviction was final before the effective date of the AEDPA, he had until April 24, 1997, to file his federal habeas petition. Flanagan v. Johnson , 154 F.3d 196, 201-02 (5th Cir. 1998). His § 2254 petition was not filed until May 3, 1999. Hebrard's state habeas application did not toll the limitations period because it was not filed until January or April of 1998, after the expiration of the limitations period. § 2244(d)(2). Hebrard does not argue that a state impediment prevented him from timely filing a § 2254 petition. § 2244(d)(1)(B). Further, Hebrard cites no authority to support his argument that because the state application was timely filed within the three-year state limitations period, it should toll the one-year federal limitations period. Hebrard also provides no support for his argument that Congress did not intend for the one-year statute of limitations to apply when a state postconviction application for relief has been properly filed or that Congress intended the limitations period to run only after state remedies have been exhausted. We noted in Flanagan , 154 F.3d at 199 n.1, that the limitations period could run before the filing of a request for habeas relief in the state courts. Finally, we note that, liberally construed, Hebrard appears to argue that the limitations period should not be applied to bar his § 2254 petition because it interferes with or impermissibly affects the state’s limitations period for the filing of state habeas applications. Hebrard, without explanation, cites ourNo. 00-30201 -3- decision in Villegas v. Johnson , 184 F.3d 467, 469-73 (5th Cir. 1999), to support his argument. In Villegas , we did note the importance of allowing state courts to first address habeas claims. We did not indicate, however, that the state’s limitations period should control the federal limitations period. For the foregoing reasons, the district court's dismissal of Hebrard's habeas petition is AFFIRMED.
USCIB: ]J.4/7 

1 December 1954 

'f ffil Si!leRE'i' 

MEivDRANDUM FOR THE MEMBER§ OF tBCIB: 

Subject: Codeword Stamps 

Reference: USCIB 13.4/6 dated 9 November 1954 

In view of the comment contained in the enclosure, the 

proposal set forth in paragraph 4 of the reference is hereby 

referred to the Security Committee for a comment as to whether 

other members consider it has suf'ticient merit to warrant 

further discussion. 

Enclosure 

CIA Memo dtd 

26 Nov 54. 

USCIB: 13 .4/7 

24 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-06-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

FORM A7031 SEP 97 

NSN. 7540-FM-001-5622 

TOP SECRET
REF ID:A65769 

•• 

ll July 1952 

TO: M'.r. H.P. Robertson 

FROM: Head, Physical Security Section 

SUBJ": Badge; 

1. This is to certify that badge number 10406 

was received by this office on the above date. 

THOMAS H. SHINN 2nd Lt. , USAF 

AFSA-161 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 04-14-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 21-0262

__________________________________________________________________

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

DEVON E. MILLER,

Petitioner/Appellee,

and

BRIAN T. MILLER, 

Respondent/Appellant.

ORDER DISMISSING 

APPEAL

This matter came before the Court on the parties’ Stipulated Motion to 

Dismiss Appeal, filed pursuant to M.R.App. P. 16(5). Having considered the same, 

and for good cause shown, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed.

DATED and electronically signed as indicated below. 

Electronically signed by:

Jim Rice

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 23 2021

08/23/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0262
• ' « - 

# • D U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N" ' 20' Q FEDERA LAVIATIO NADMINISTRATIO N' '
. r. ^ 

## --DOCKE T I n th e Matte r

of: Empir e Airlines , Inc. ,

Responden t Judg e Goodwi n FA A Docke t No . CP09NM000 9 FA A Cas e No . 2007NM70015 5 

### p-pkf^c^iOD^'O^i^

^

RESPONDENT' S RESPONS ET O ADMINISTRATOR' S MOTIO NT O

RESCHEDUL EHEARIN G Empir e Airlines , Inc. , b y an dthroug hit s attorneys , an dpursuan t t o sectio n13.21 8
o f th e Federa l Aviatio n Administration' s Rule s o f Practic e i nCivi l Penalty Proceedings , 1 4 CF R§ 13.218 , file s thi s Respons e t o th e Administrator' s Motio nt o Reschedul e Hearing , an di n support

thereo f states : 1
. O n May 26 , 2010 , Judg e Goodwi nissue danorde r settin g th e hearin g for

th e abov e cas e o n Jul y 2 9 an d30 , 2010
. 2
. O n Jun e 1 , 2010 , th e Administrato r file damotio nseekin g t o reschedul e th e hearing du e t o aschedulin g conflic t o f it s primary witness
. 3
. Witnesses an dattorney s for Empir e Airlines , Inc . ar e availabl e Augus t 2 " throug hAugus t

13**^
. WHEREFORE , Empir e Airlines , Inc . respectfull y request s that th e Court reschedul e th e hearin g at

atim e that

th e witnesse s an dattorney s for Empir e Airlines , Inc . ar e available
.Respectfull y submitted ,
Empir e Airlinesyinc
. c/o FEDERA LEXPRES S CORPORATIO N Courtne y E . Felt s Senio r Attorney , Regulatory Affair s 362 0 Hack s Cros s Road , Buildin g B , 3" * Floo r Memphis , I N3812 5 (901 ) 434-863 2 (901 ) 434-828 3 FA X CERTIFICAT EO FSERVIC E I hereb y certif

y tha t atru e an dcorrec t

cop y o f th e foregoin g wa s forwarde dvi a FedE x Overnigh t

delivery o n th e M ^ da

y o f June , 201 0 to : Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Wilbu r Wrigh t Building , Suite 2W100 0 Washington , D C 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Mr . Jame s Conneel y Attorne y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l Enforcemen t

Division , AGC-3 0 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Roo m912- C Washington , D C 2059 1Lawrenc e W . Bierlei n 110 1 30thStreet , NW , Suit e 50 0 Washington , D C 2000 7 (202 ) 625-835 5 (202 ) 625-436 3 FA X

Courtne y E . Felt s
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In
connection with the Annual Report of CLP Power Hong Kong Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark
Takahashi, Head of Finance and Treasury Function of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                                                     
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: June 16, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Mark Takahashi
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Mark Takahashi Head of Finance and Treasury Function
# Resources

National Reconnaissance Office
Launch your CareerDo Business With Us- Home
- About
- Careers
- Launches
- Work With Us
- News & Media
- Resources

- facebook
- twitter
- youtube
- instagram
- linkedin

Contact Us

National Reconnaissance Office

                                  - facebook
                                  - twitter
                                  - youtube
                                  - instagram
                                  - linkedin
Contact Us

Who We Are                                  - Mission Partners & Customers
                                  - Our Leadership
                                  - A Declassified History

Careers                                  - Working at the NRO
                                  - Career Fields
                                  - Job Listings
                                  - Student Opportunities

Launches                                  - Missions
                                  - Launch Vehicles

Do Business With Us                                  - How To Do Business With Us
                                  - Director's Innovation Initiative
                                  - Acquisition Research Center

News & Media                                  - Featured Stories
                                  - Press Releases
                                  - Podcasts
                                  - Speeches and Testimony

Resources                                  - NRO Multimedia
                                  - Request a Speaker
                                  National Reconnaissance Office - Above and Beyond
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7910
LARRY D. PHILLIPS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CA-01-700-2) Submitted: February 20, 2003 Decided: March 12, 2003 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry D. Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Larry D. Phillips seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2254 petition solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both "(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’" Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Phillips has not made the requisite showing. SeePhillips v. Johnson , No. CA-01-700-2 (E.D. Va. Dec. 5, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
exv10w1







Exhibit 10.1




EXTENSION TO OPTION AGREEMENT



THIS EXTENSION TO OPTION AGREEMENT (this “Extension”) dated as of October 27, 2008 is between
Alseres Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation with offices at 239 South Street, Hopkinton,
MA 01748 (“Alseres”) and BioAxone Therapeutic Inc.(“BA”), a Canadian corporation with offices at
1100 Boulevard Rene-Levesque Ouest, 25th floor, Montreal,QC, Canada, H3B 5C9.



Whereas Alseres and BA entered into an Option Agreement dated as of April 30, 2008 pursuant to
which the parties agreed to amend the License Agreement between them dated as of December 28, 2006
upon the payment to BA by Alseres of the Option Fee (as defined in the Option Agreement) on or
before the expiration of the Option Period (as defined in the Option Agreement);



Whereas the parties desire to extend the Option Period through November 27, 2008 with all other
terms of the Option Agreement remaining the same;



Now Therefore, in exchange for consideration the adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, do agree to extend the Option Period to
expire on November 27, 2008 and agree that all other terms of the Option Agreement will remain in
full force and effect as written therein.



The undersigned duly authorized parties have set forth their signatures as of the date first
indicated above.




	 	 	 	 	 
	BIOAXONE THERAPEUTIC INC.

 	 	 
	By  	/s/ Andre Vaillant
 	 	 
	 	Name  	Andre Vaillant 	 	 
	 	Title  	Chief Financial Officer 	 	 
	 
	ALSERES PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

 	 	 
	By  	/s/ Kenneth L. Rice
 	 	 
	 	Name  	Kenneth L. Rice 	 	 
	 	Title  	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Doc ID: 3979276
Doc ID: 3979276
Doc ID: 3979276
Doc ID: 3979276
Doc ID: 3979276
Doc ID: 3979276
Doc ID: 3979276
Doc ID: 3979276
Doc ID: 3979276
Doc ID: 3979276
Doc ID: 3979276
Doc ID: 3979276
Doc ID: 3979276
:i:g;t_,~])-:- A5 2 312 3 

- - - - H ;- - 1 UH~ ~ i_JJS~l~ EC " .. H-~ • • c 

. - ~· ~.;~ l)~~---- -~ ~·. USc1f3 1J~ ~ - I 0 I 

- ------- --------------- -------------

---~--~--~~--~--~-_il ~· 8u_~~~-~-~\~o ~&..~~~~~-+ 

_,;,,. ::tY:i ·bQQ.,,.,,._;.. . 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

- --------·-··--- --------------- --~--

-!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

- GECRElJ 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 08-13-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
Doc ID: 6566168
Doc ID: 6566168
Doc ID: 6566168
Doc ID: 6566168
Doc ID: 6566168
Doc ID: 6566168
Doc ID: 6566168
Doc ID: 6566168
Doc ID: 6566168
Doc ID: 6566168
Doc ID: 6566168
Doc ID: 6566168
Doc ID: 6566168
Doc ID: 6566168
Doc ID: 6566168
Doc ID: 6566168
Doc ID: 6566168
Doc ID: 6566168
Doc ID: 6566168
Doc ID: 6566168
Doc ID: 6566168
Doc ID: 6566168
Doc ID: 6566168
Doc ID: 6566168
Doc ID: 6566168
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code
  (i)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the
periods indicated.
 Date:  February 11, 2008
    /s/ DANA M. KELLEYDana M. KelleyVice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer
St. Jude Medical, Inc. Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-Q







EXHIBIT 10.6





AMENDMENT 


TO THE


ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.


2007 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


 


WHEREAS, St. Jude Medical, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (the “Company”), has heretofore adopted and maintains the “St. Jude Medical, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan” (the “Plan”);


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has retained the power to amend the Plan; and


WHEREAS, the Board has authorized the amendment of the Plan to bring the Plan into compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). 


NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the power of amendment contained in Section 7(a) of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of October 23, 2008, as follows:


1.  Section 2(l) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding “in accordance with Section 409A of the Code” at the end of the first sentence thereof.


2.  Section 6(h) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following at the end of the last sentence of clause (iii) thereof:


“; provided that the timing of any deferred payments shall be determined at the time of grant, except to the extent otherwise permitted under Section 409A of the Code.”


 









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorized agent on this 23rd day of October, 2008.


 





	
 
 	
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.
 
	
 
 	
 
 	
 
 
	
 
 	
By
 	
/s/ Pamela S. Krop
 


















2
-

---

,---

=--

~-

w ---; - _- ..:., ----- -

, I -

~ ~li!ml~tt• ot ~etk He\~ 

lt Decembe;r_lCJ.M. 

. ' 

'*l. Yoii! and Procedure. - Arter extended discussion the Peraomel 

Control c:ommtt.~a agr:id0-to 1g1ve the question o£ workloaclstudle• and work 

s1mplif'1cat1on immediate attention. Theee studies are to be made 1n the 

Personnel and Training Division f'irst,, and the principles &nd experience 

gained to be applied to the opera.til'Jf; branches in other divisions in the 

ruture. 

Colonel Johnston suggested that Colonel Vaughan, or a representative trom.- hia of rice, _be requested to confer wf"th the --P-i~~_onn!_l ~ntrol 

Committee ~give advic~ and information aa to the_~ct~o~ ot ~· 

Personnel Control QoJDIJ!1ttee :1n the O!t~o• ot tA.e (llj,tf ~al O!'ticer 

in conducting •tudies ot this kind in other Signal Corpa installations. rt wa11 agreed that Colonel Johnston should coritaot COlonOl.V&Uglian arr:t 

arrang"i; a apecial meeting tor thia purpose. 

_*2. Tables ot Oa::ganisation. - Major Kina reported substantial progres~_being made on T/O and indicated that thia work woo.ld be oomp1eted during the to:rthcominc week. The question or allocation ot 

enlisted. r.:ien hae been •ettled with the exception ot Intelligence 

Division where Qn& or two points ara. still in dispute. 

*3• gv;r-lap o! Shirts. - Colonel Johnatoh reported a meeting has 

been called or Wednesday at 1400 to discuss hours ot work and the 

present Post polioy- in that regard. All Branch Personnel Of'ticera, 

and Qolonel Johnston and Mr. Rhoads ot the PerQOnr\.81 Qo~rQ.l Qonmi:~tee, 

are to at~end~ . 

Approved ~----~""!"""'-­ ·w._ Preston Corderman 

COlonel, .Si.ft.ai Corps -eopri~~ 

. , .. 

. 

-;-, 

- -

~ -:::_ 

Joeaph w. Johnston 

Lt. QJilonel, Signal Corps 

locor4ei' 

_ Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-07-2014 pursuant to E .0. 1352a 

-

. -;;mi 

w~! --· 

---r.-....,j 

-~
Letter, dated August 19, 2008, to Teresa A. Taylor



 Exhibit 10.24 
  

			
	August 19, 2008	 	



 Teresa A. Taylor 
 1801 California Street 
 Denver, CO 80202 
 Dear
Teresa: 
 Giving people the opportunity to develop professionally through new challenges is an investment in our greatest resource – employees.
Fostering and developing the talent of employees is critical to the success of the business and to our future. With that, I am pleased to offer you the position of Executive Vice President, Business Markets Group, reporting directly to me, effective
August 19, 2008. I am confident of the value you will continue to bring to the business. The key compensation opportunities of your new role are highlighted below. 
  


	1.	Base Salary: Your base salary increases to $500,000 per annum. 

  

	2.	Annual Bonus Plan: You will be eligible to participate in the annual bonus plan. Your target bonus will remain at 100% of your annual base pay. 

  

	3.	Executive Perquisite: You will continue receive an executive perquisite benefit of $35,000 paid to you annually in January. 

  

	 4.
	 Background Check: As a condition of this internal transfer, you must undergo and pass a background check at this
time. Please complete and return the enclosed Request for Information and Consent and Disclosure forms within 5 business days of your receipt of this letter to Jana Venus at 1801 California Street, 23rd Floor, Denver, CO 80202. You will not be contacted as to the results of the background check unless there is a problem. 


  

	5.	Other: Your executive benefits and the other terms and conditions of your employment shall continue to be governed by your agreement with the company dated July 28, 2003 and
amended on December 15, 2005. 

 Congratulations on this wonderful opportunity, Teresa. I look forward to your continued strong performance and
the contribution you will make to the success of Qwest. 
 Sincerely, 
 

 
 Thomas E. Richards 
 Executive Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer