alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HEIR
‘TESA
m Be

s¢ rreig uatter to AFABP, Subject: ‘fiequirement for Funds for Construction
.9f FY 60 SAMOS ‘and MIDAS Facilities, dated 13 October 1959,

C. Memdrendtin for Director, ARPA, Subject: Request for Construction
Funds for Facilities Supporting SAMOS R&D Program, dated 8 February 1960,

a. Construction Find Réquest, Submission No. 4F~TA-60-17 to Director
of Budget, Comptroller of the Air Force, dated 2 March 1960,

2. ‘The above’ references ‘are all pertinent to the effort of the Air Force

to obtain funds for’ the SAMOS, ‘MIDAS Program ‘that were appropriated to

“ARPA, . To date, ‘the Air Force has been required to obtain funds in small
Anorements by Justifying individual construction projects. ‘This procedure
often becomes embroiled -in interpretation of program phasing, fund transfer
gyrations, etc, Delay of the second increment of the Sunnyvala, California

- Development Control Center ;Was avoided only by the Air Force using funds
_from another Program while awaiting transfer of ARPA monies to the Air Force.
3. FY 60 funds in. amount of $1,425,000 have been. requested, by ref 1.4.
above,. for purposes of.

Air Force ‘Base and Pt. Arguello. In response to AFBMD's request for funds

for Sub-Systen "L", ‘This’ facili is-required by 15 May 1960 and is being
elipped on @ day-to-day basis whi wvalting fhasing actions (Ref 1.0. above).

4e If the Al Force 48 to expect timly construction of facilities for the
Samos, MIDAS Program, it is imerative that funds be made ail,
to meet contract award schedules, nek ” able wm tine



: . . ZS é .
5. It 4p again requested that your office take every possible action to
accelerate the availability of funds as requested in reference l.a. above.

H. K. KELLEY

Brigadior General, U. S. Air Force
Deputy Director for Construction
Directorate of Civil Engineering, DCS/0
REF ID:A522639 

-FOP SECRE-~-

It is agreed tha't tbe following steps in approaching 

t~ ~tiJ.l. be proposed during discussian vith the U.K. 

authorities. Each step wi,ll be considered :ln the order 

listed and the probability of' success completely exhausted 

prior to 8.D1' discussion relating to the succeed1Jl8 step. 

Eo 3. 3 I h I I 2 I 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

l. Possibility of the offer of cryptoequipmentso 

2. Exchange or ceyptoaeeuri ty pmct1ces and procedures. 

~~---1 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-03-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

TOP SEGRET
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Riggs National
Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Steven T. Tamburo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|                          |  | 
|------------------------- |  | 
|By: /s/ Steven T. Tamburo |  | 
|                         
|                         
|                         
|                         
|                          |  | 
|                         
|                         
|                         
|                         
|Name: Steven T. Tamburo   |  | 
|                         
|                         
|                         
|                         
|Chief Financial Officer   |  | 
|                         
|                         
|                         
|                         
|November 8, 2002          |  |
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 16

- 00259

- CV NO. 02

- 16

- 00260

- CV

THE CITY OF FORT WOR TH AND DAVID COOKE, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CITY MAN AGER APPELLANTS

V.

STEPHANNIE LYNN RYLI E, UNITED LAND HOLDING, LTD., NORTH TEXAS AMUSEMEN TS, LLC, TEXAS C&D AMUSE MENTS, INC., BRIAN AND LIS A SCOTT D/B/A TSCA AND D/B/A RIVER BOTTOM PUB, DSLH, IN C., PROGRESSIVE AMUSEMEN T, IN C., ARS GROUP, INC., PARVINDER ‘ PAUL ’ SIDHU, ET AL. APPELLEES

----------

FROM THE 17TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 017

- 276483

- 15, 017

- 276483

- 15

----------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 ----------
Having considered the petition s for permissive interlocutory appeal 2 of

Appellants t he City of Fort Worth and David Cooke, in his official capacity as city

manager, we deny the petition s

. 3

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 29, 2016

2 See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(d) (West Supp. 2016); see also Tex. R. A pp. P. 28.3(a), (j).

3 See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(f).
99-511.

#### Lyttle v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.

Cuyahoga App. No. 73620. Reported at 85 Ohio St.3d 1499, 710 N.E.2d 717. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Douglas and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Airguide, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) I, James Frack, President, Treasurer and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



Date:

July 3, 2006



/s/  James Frack

James Frack

President, Treasurer

& Chief Executive Officer
MEMO RIJ9NG SLIP NEYER USE FOR APPROJIALS, APPROJIALS, 

CONCURRENCES, OR SIMl1J9c:'rlONS 

1 NAME OR TITLE c:!>c:P?:= INITIALS 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION DATE 

2 

3 

4 

.• 

roved for Release b NSA on 04-15-2014 

DD FORM 95 ReplacesDAAOOForm895,1Apr48,andAli'HQ I FEB 50 Form 12. 10 Nov 47, which may IJe used. 

CIRCULATE 

COORDINATION 

FILE 

INFORMATION 

NECESSARY 

ACTION 

NOTE AND 

RETURN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

'tc G'PO 1111. • 0 111514 

MEMO ROl19G SLIP I NAME OR TlnE 

2 

3 

.. 

REMARKS 

ID~ 

NF.VU< USE FON. APi'N.UV .41..S, DIARoV .41..S, 

CONCURRENCES, OR SIMILAJ910NS 

INITIALS 

DATE 

CIRCULATE 

COORDINATION 

FILE 

INFORMATION 

NECESSARY ACTION 

NOTE AND REfURN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

DD I F

FOERBM

50 

9 5 Roplaces DA AGO Form 800, 1 Apr 48, and AFHQ 1' GPO 101 • 0 llHH 

Form 12, 10 Nov '*7• which may be used. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
MORGAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
  EXHIBIT 12 - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                   (Dollars In Thousands Except Ratio Amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         Year Ended December 31,
                                                        ---------------------------------------------------------
                                                           2006        2005        2004       2003        2002
                                                        ----------  ----------  ----------  ---------   ---------
<S>                                                     <C>          <C>        <C>         <C>         <C>
Earnings:
   Pre-tax income from continuing operations before
   cumulative effect of a change in accounting
   principle and before adjustment for minority
   interest and equity earnings (including
   amortization of excess cost of equity investments)
   per statements of income...........................  $  935,700   $ 757,934  $  783,368  $ 632,933   $ 549,536
Add:
   Fixed charges......................................     374,386     293,963     215,642    188,483     184,678
   Amortization of capitalized interest...............       1,216         808         589        447         329
   Distributed income of equity investees.............      67,865      63,098      65,248     83,000      77,735
Less:
   Interest capitalized from continuing operations....     (18,368)     (9,830)     (6,378)    (5,310)     (5,778)
   Minority interest in pre-tax income of subsidiaries
   with no fixed charges..............................        (503)       (408)       (128)        16           --
                                                        ----------  ----------  ----------  ---------   ---------
   Income as adjusted.................................  $1,360,296  $1,105,565  $1,058,341  $ 899,569   $ 806,500
                                                        ----------  ----------  ----------  ---------   ---------


Fixed charges:
   Interest and debt expense, net per statements
   of income (includes amortization of debt discount,
   premium, and debt issuance costs; excludes
   capitalized interest)..............................  $  356,365  $  278,188  $  202,550  $ 188,087   $ 184,057
Add:
   Portion of rents representative of the interest
   factor.............................................      18,021      15,775      13,092        396         621
                                                        ----------  ----------  ----------  ---------   ---------
   Fixed charges......................................  $  374,386  $  293,963  $  215,642  $ 188,483   $ 184,678
                                                        ----------  ----------  ----------  ---------   ---------


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges....................        3.63        3.76        4.91       4.77        4.37
                                                        ==========  ==========  ==========  =========   =========
</TABLE>
EXHIBITS

                              TO FORM 10-Q

                            FOR QUARTER ENDED

                             October 2, 1999



                                                     EXHIBIT 11.1

                           BAIRNCO CORPORATION
           CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
       FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED OCTOBER 2, 1999 AND OCTOBER 3, 1998
                               (Unaudited)


                                               1999           1998
BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:

Net income                                     $  2,013,000   $ 1,173,000

Average common shares outstanding                 7,895,000     8,567,000

Basic Earnings Per Common Share                $       0.25   $      0.14


DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:

Net income                                     $  2,013,000   $ 1,173,000

Average common shares outstanding                 7,895,000     8,567,000
Common shares issuable in respect to options
  issued to employees with a dilutive effect        125,000        42,000
Total diluted common shares outstanding           8,020,000     8,609,000

Diluted Earnings Per Common Share              $       0.25   $      0.14



                                                           EXHIBIT 11.2

                           BAIRNCO CORPORATION
           CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
     FOR THE NINE MONTHS MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 2, 1999 AND OCTOBER 3, 1998
                               (Unaudited)


                                               1999           1998
BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:

Net income                                     $ 6,597,000    $ 4,957,000

Average common shares outstanding                8,005,000      8,739,000

Basic Earnings Per Common Share                $      0.82    $      0.57


DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:

Net income                                     $ 6,597,000    $ 4,957,000

Average common shares outstanding                8,005,000      8,739,000
Common shares issuable in respect to options
  issued to employees with a dilutive effect        68,000         67,000
Total diluted common shares outstanding          8,073,000      8,806,000

Diluted Earnings Per Common Share              $      0.82    $      0.56
Session 15 

Group A 

• REF ID:A72193 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

EXECUTIVE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 

22 October 1953 

1000 - 1150 

Room 00020B MIS 

INTRODUCTION TO CASE S'l1JDIES PROGRAM AND DISCUSSION 

Hl WORKGROUP OF SEMINAR PROGRAM CONTENT 

OBJECTIVES 

1. To introduce the purpose arid procedures of the Case Studies 

Program. 

2. To have Group A evaluate the subject matter of their seminar 

program and arrive at recommendations for the content or future seminar 

series. 

AGENDA 

1. Presentation of purpose and procedure of ·the Case Studies 

Program by Dr. Sydney Jafte. 

2. Discussion and evaluation ot the Group A seminar series by 

small workgroups. 

DISCUSSION 

Following the briefing on the Case studies Program, Group A 

will be broken down into workgroups to discuss the seminar series. The 

recol?Dllendations of these workgroups will be used in planning the program 

tor Groups C and D. 

The tallowing questions are provided as a guide in getting discussion underway. It is not necessary that all questions be discussed -

or discussed in any order. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 02-06-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
• REF ID:A72193 

1. Considering the content or each or the seminars, what 

subjects were of little value and could have been eliminated? 

2. Which or the subjects discussed by Group A would you consider ''musts" for tuture seminar groups? 

,3. What specific topics do you think should have been considered 

by Gl'Ollp A? 

4. Have any or the subjects discussed by Group A been of any 

use to you in your present position? 

5. Which of the following topics should have been included as 

seminar topics? 

The Executive's Responsibility tor Management 

Personalities vs. Functions in Organization structure 

Military - Civil Service Relationships 

Planning tor EJcpansion and Contraction 

Delegation of Authority• Responsibility i. and Work 

Establishment or Incentives to Good Performance 

Limitations 01' Persona..t Control 

Measuring Results 

6. As a whole, did you get more .from the sessions presented 

by"outsidersn? Do you think there should have been more representatives 

from business and industry? 

.• 

7. What NSA activities and programs should have been discussed? 

(Personnel, Movement Group, Security, etc.) 

- 2 -
• REF ID:A72193 

8. Were the reading materials of any value? Should they be 

continued? Ir you were to receive reading materials in the future, what· 

subjects would you be particularly interested in? 

9. Could the sessions on Communications and Organization have 

been .followed up? How? 

10. Would you favor more or less participation by the Group? 

- .3 -
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,824
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,147
<ALLOWANCES>                                       914
<INVENTORY>                                      9,405
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,629
<PP&E>                                          18,563
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,122
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,476
<BONDS>                                            442
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           124
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,082
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,288
<SALES>                                         55,080
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,080
<CGS>                                           23,813
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,813
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,629
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   170
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  51
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     61
<INCOME-TAX>                                        18
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 43
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        43
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
# CE2004084EN.01043201.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/432 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/432

---

(2004/C 84 E/0503)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0586/04

by Bill Newton Dunn (ELDR) to the Commission

(26 February 2004)

Subject:   Horse passports

Subject:

How many of the Member States have implemented European Commission Decision 2000/68/EC (1)? Is the Commission satisfied that they have done so correctly?

1

Does the Commission have any plans to allow the use of freeze marking and/or microchipping as acceptable methods of identification?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(1 April 2004)

(1 April 2004)

According to Article 4 of Commission Decision 2000/68/EC of 22 December 1999 amending Commission Decision 93/623/EEC and establishing the identification of equidae for breeding and production, Member States shall ensure that as from 1 July 2000 at the latest, registered equidae and equidae for breeding and production are accompanied during their movement by the identification document as referred to above. This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Decision 2000/68/EC does not oblige Member States to notify the legal provisions they have implemented to comply with the provisions of this Decision. So far, the Commission has not received any complaint relating to the failure of a Member State to implement the above Decision.

Community animal welfare legislation does not contain specific restrictions of the use of these methods. With regard to mutilations in general, Council Directive 98/58/EC of 20 July 1998 concerning the protection of animals kept for farming purposes (2) stipulates that relevant national provisions shall apply in accordance with the general rules of the EC Treaty.

2

The Commission is aware that in certain Member States electronic transponders are used for the identification of equidae. Furthermore, freeze marking and hot branding are used to mark equidae. Freeze branding was required by Community legislation for equidae vaccinated against African horse sickness when this disease occurred on the Iberian Peninsula in 1989.

The legislation in force allows additional active marking in excess of the identification by passport. In such cases, details about the applied marks have to be specified in the identification document.

---

(1)  OJ L 23, 28.1.2000, p. 72.

1

(2)  OJ L 221, 8.8.1998.

2

---
### -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/25 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.50 N 76.81 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
REF ID:A65928 ,. 

MEMO ROUTING SLIP 'ER USE FOR APPROVALS, DISA.PPROYALS, 

CONCURRENCES, OR SIMILAR ACTIONS 

1 NAME Oft TITLE INITIALS 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION DATE 

CIRCULATE 

COORDINATION 

FILE 

INFORMATION 

NECESSARY 

ACTION 

NOTE AND RETURN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

roved for Release b NSA on 04-15-2014 ursuantto E .0. 1352 

FROM NAME OR Tlll.E DATE 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION TELEPHONE 

DD FORM 9 5 Replaces DA AGO ll'onn 895, 1 Apr ts, and AFRQ f FEB 50 Form 12, 10 Nov ~7, which may l:ie uaed. 

-·. -
Exhibit (15)



February 1, 2006



C-COR Incorporated

State College, Pennsylvania



|Re: | Registration Statements on Form S-3 and Form S-8
|--- | ------------------------------------------------



With respect to the subject registration statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-82697, 333-87909, 333-90011, 333-90589, 333-32676, 333-75888, 333-124182) and on Form S-8 (Nos.
333-124259, 333-116204, 333-64040, 333-61226, 333-49826, 333-43592, 333-30982, 333-89067, 333-65805, 333-02505), we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated February 1, 2006 related to our review of interim financial
information.



Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the
Act), such report is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant, or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



|                        
|------------------------
|                        
|/s/ KPMG LLP            
|Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

98-2452.

#### Clark v. Forney.

Sandusky App. No. S-97-053. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Sandusky County. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

*1483ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is,' dismissed.
-77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0 -75.5 -75.0

39.0 39.5 40.0



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 08/24 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 24 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.06 N 76.88 WMeters AGL
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 15 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk Ju ly 15 , 2020

1 6 1349

DAVID CAMPBELL,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 161349

v C O A: 350849

Ingham CC: 19

- 000446

- NZ

CORIZON HEALTH INC.,

Defendant

- Appellee

. _______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, given plaintiff

- appellant’s failure to pay the initial

partial filing fee as required by the June 8, 2020 order, the Clerk of t he Court is directed to

administratively close this file. The application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED.