alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.2

The
Board of Directors
KEMET Corporation:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-107411, 333-92963, 33-98912 and 333-140943) on
Form S-3; and (333-123308, 33-96226 and 333-67849) on Form S-8, of KEMET Corporation of our report dated June 30, 2009,
except with respect to the change in accounting for convertible debt to reflect the adoption of the provisions of FASB Staff Position No. APB 14-1, as to which the date is as
of November 5, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of KEMET Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2009 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended March 31, 2009, as included in the annual report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010.

Our
report dated June 30, 2009, except with respect to the change in accounting for convertible debt to reflect the adoption of the provisions of FASB Staff Position
No. APB 14-1, as to which the date is as of November 5, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of KEMET Corporation and subsidiaries as of
March 31, 2009 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year
period ended March 31, 2009 refers to other auditors. We did not audit the consolidated financial statements of Arcotronics Italia S.p.A and subsidiaries (Arcotronics Group), a
wholly-owned subsidiary, which financial statements reflect total assets constituting approximately 20 percent in 2009 and total net sales constituting approximately 19 percent and
10 percent in 2009 and 2008 respectively, of the related consolidated totals. Those financial statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion,
insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Arcotronics Group, is based solely on the report of the other auditors.

Our
report, dated June 30, 2009, except with respect to the change in accounting for convertible debt to reflect the adoption of the provisions of FASB Staff Position
No. APB 14-1, as to which the date is as of November 5, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of KEMET Corporation and subsidiaries as of
March 31, 2009 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year
period ended March 31, 2009 includes: (a) an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern; and (b) an explanatory
paragraph relating to the adoption of the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesan interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109).

/s/ KPMG LLP KPMG LLP


Greenville,
South Carolina
May 25, 2010

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Lattice, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul Burgess, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      August 18, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Paul BurgessPaul
      Burgess
                President
      (principal executive
officer)
# CE2004084EN.01081102.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/811 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/811

---

(2004/C 84 E/0906)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0573/04

by Michl Ebner (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(26 February 2004)

Subject:   Start of construction work on the Brenner base tunnel

Subject:

After years of negotiations, building work on the Brenner base tunnel is due to start in 2006. This infrastructure project will involve diverting traffic and will therefore have negative repercussions on people living near the route, including greater noise nuisance, both during and after construction of the tunnel.

What steps is the Commission envisaging to protect local people during the building work?

Is the Commission providing funds for the construction of noise barriers?

Does the Commission intend to do anything to reduce the nuisance while construction work is going on?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(13 April 2004)

(13 April 2004)

According to the current timetable of the Brenner base tunnel the construction of a pilot tunnel to explore the geological situation on the entire tunnel length may start in 2006.

Any environmental impact during and after the construction phase is subject to a detailed Environmental Impact Assessment required by the Italian and the Austrian law.

Initial environmental studies have revealed certain potential conflicting matters. The responsible environmental authorities in Italy and Austria have already requested the close examination of those issues.

The measures necessary to minimize or avoid environmental nuisances during and after the construction phase will be defined in the environmental impact statement on either side of the border. Those measures will become part of the tunnel project and will in so far be subject to potential EU financial support.

In addition, the Commission-proposal of July 2003 to amend the ‘Eurovignette’ directive (1) suggests explicitly that ‘any infrastructure costs designed to reduce nuisance related to noise’ be considered eligible cost factors in calculating user fees.

1

As the Commission is not conducting the project, the measures will have to be implemented by the project promoter, i.e. the Brenner Base Tunnel EEIG (and future BBT SE) and followed by respective national authorities.

---

(1)  Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 1999/62/EC on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures.

1

---
OGA 

REF ID:A517330 

~PCRMNO.M i ::>P see1=f E~r . . .. \.. .. ·· .·· . · Sf8tlflJJV IHF8RMAFIBN . . Office!.Memorandum • UNITED sTATEs Gov 

TO .. cbail-man, us Delegation to the\ Cont4tN11ce onl 1. ..... _ _. 

. . Hr. JI~ D. ·Jones FROM, ,. 

DATE: 12 Ma;y 195) 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

SUBJECT: Composition. ot Delegation 

The following nominations to membership on the coming conlerence delegation 

have been submitted b;y member departments and agencies or the Board: 

STA.TB: Mr.'·aobert F. Pack&rd 

(aii4- poaaibJ.T~.ther) 

DEFENSE: Mr. WUHam Godel (before 18 May) 

Lt. Col. E. F. Black (after 18 Y..ay) 

Mr. V. P. Keay (Mr. S. D. Ellis - .Alternate) 

I.RMI· -· 

~· WJJ ~!=Friedman, Chairman 

;e ... ~ I r. 

Lt. Gelenel 6lei, C. Long <?oLone/ /llEei /.t. cJder6v~,,y 

NAVY: Captain Gifford Grange, (202) · 

Lt. Colonel John M. Anderson, USAF 

.___ ____ ___.IF vS.1 vt.(~\ .. ,;°"21! 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 09-24-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
USCIB: 2$ • 2/ 6 

'PQP SKSB:l!i'i' 

MEMORANDUM FOR 'lllE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

References: 

Release of AFS.AM-7 to NATO Nations. 

(a) USCIB 2$.2/l dated 3 May 1954. 

(b) USCIB 2$.2/4 dated 27 May 1954. 

4 June 1954 

l. The references were considered at a joint meeting of the United 

States Communications Intelligence Board and the United States 

Communications Security Board held at 1430, 3 June 1954, in Room 3E 869, 

The Pentagon. 

24 

2. It was agreed that, subject to verification of the understanding 

that existing agreements with the United Kingdom include provision of the 

AFSAM-7 to the United Kingdom for national use, the United States should 

not entertain requests from other friendly nations, with the exception of 

Canada, for supply of the AFSAM-7 for national use until the needs of the 

United States and those of the military c~ds of the North Atlantic 

Treaty Organization have been met. It was further agreed that the 

Director, National Security Agency should respond in effect as above to 

the instant query of the Washington liaison official of the U.K. Cypher 

Policy Board pointing out at the same time that this policy is not 

intended to in any way inhibit the operation of existing U.S.-British 

agreements with regard to provision of U.S. cryptographic material and 

information to the British. 

3. For the information of members the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff 

approved the provision of AFSAM-7 (with ADONIS c:rypto-principle) on a 

free loan basis for Combined and NATO use on 16 January 1953 and so 

notified the Representatives of the United Kingdom Chiefs of Staff. The 

Representatives of the United Kingdom Chiefs of Staff asked on 4 February 

1953 for clarification of this decision as follows: 

tt(a) Could the machines be lent for use until new British 

machines embodying the ADONIS Principle, have been manufactured; 

(b) Could an assurance be given that the above loan of 

ma.chines can be made at little or no dollar expense ••• ? 11 

USCIB: 2$.2/6 

ro .. 0 SBCRBT 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-21-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 
USCIB: 2$ • 2/ 6 

4 June 1954 

'!'OF ffi!IORi!l'!' 

Subject: Release of AFSAM-7 to NATO Nations. 

In response to this query the Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff 

replied on 11 February 1953 in part as follows: 

"b. The United States will be prepared to provide the machines 

required by the United Kingdom as well as by NATO. 

c. The necessary number of machines can be lent to the U.K., 

for retum to the U.S. when the new British equipments, embodying 

the ADONIS principle, have been manufactured. I am in.formed that 

under foreseeable conditions, arrangements for this loan can be 

made with little or no dollar expense to the U.K. 11 

4. In the absence of objection of any member of USCIB or USCSB to 

the above record of decision by 15 June 1954 it will be considered 

approved and the Director, NSA will be e..xpected to act accordingly. 

5. This document is graded TOP SECRET owing to references to and 

extracts from actions of the Joint Chiefs of Staff already so classified. 

USCIB: 2$.2/6 

f'OPSEGRBT
MEMORANDUM

DATE: November 20, 2014

TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR-2013-0602

FROM: Rob Lawrence

EPA/Region 6/PD

SUBJECT: July 10, 2014 Call with Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality regarding 

the Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

A conference call was made by EPA to the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality and 

the attendees listed below on July 10, 2014, to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants, which was proposed on June 2, 2014. 

ATTENDEES

Participants: Tegan Treadaway, Vivian Aucoin, and Mike Vince

EPA Participants: Mark Hansen, Clovis Steib, Terry Johnson, and Guy Donaldson (Region 6) 

and Brian Fisher, and Kristen Bremer (OAR)
UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

NSA Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Complaints Data

Posted Pursuant to the No Fear Act

FY23 (4th Quarter)

I. Complaints of Discrimination Filed

Number of Complaints Filed 39

Number of Individuals Filing Complaints 34

Number of Individuals Filing Two or More Complaints 5

II. Bases of Complaints Filed

Age 11

Color 5

Disability 14

National Origin 4

Race 18

GINA 3

Religion 5

Reprisal 10

Sex 13

1. Equal Pay Act 0

2. Pregnancy Discrimination Act 0

III. Issues of Complaints Filed

Appointment/Hire 4

Assignment of Duties 2

Awards 1

Disciplinary Action

Warning 2

Removal 3

Suspension 1

Disciplinary 2

Duty Hours 1

Evaluation/Appraisal 3

Examination/Test 0

Harassment (Sexual) 0

(Non-Sexual) 5

Promotion/Non-selection 5

Reasonable Accommodation 0

Reassignment - Denied 1

Termination 4
UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Terms and Conditions of Employment 7

Time and Attendance 2

Training 0

IV. Average Complaints Processing Time to Completion

All Investigations

1. Hearing Not Requested 261.33

2. Hearing Requested 210.32

Final Actions by Agency

1. Processing Time Without a Hearing/FAD 229.53

2. Processing Time With a Hearing/Final Order 182.57

V. Dismissals

Number of Dismissals 4

Average Days Pending At the Time of Dismissal 88

VI. Withdrawals

Number of Complaints Withdrawn by Complainants 0

VII. Findings of Discrimination

Findings Rendered with a Hearing

Number of Findings 0

Findings Rendered without a Hearing

Number of Findings 0

Issues of Findings of Discrimination

Number of Issues 0

Bases of Findings of Discrimination

Number of Bases 0

VIII. Pending Complaints Carried Over From Previous FYs

Complaints Open Any Length of Time During Reporting Year

1. Number of Individuals Filing These Complaints 39

2. Number of These Complaints Currently Pending 24

Status of These Cases:

1. Investigation 14

2. Final Agency Action 0

Hearing 18

 Appeal 11

IX. Complaints Pending Any Length of Time This Fiscal Year Not 

Investigated Within 180 Days (plus any authorized extensions)

0
Exhibit 4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
  

					
	 State of Delaware
 Secretary of State
 Division of Corporations
 Delivered 03:09 PM 10/23/2008
 FILED
03:09 PM 10/12/2008
 SRV 081061754 - 4615344 FILE
	 		 	

 CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF 
 UNION CAPITAL STATUTORY TRUST III 
 THIS Certificate of Trust of Union
Capital Statutory Trust III (the “Trust”) is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as trustees, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. § 3801 et seq.)(the
“Act”). 
  

	1.	Name. The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is Union Capital Statutory Trust III. 

  

	2.	Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust in the State of Delaware is Wilmington Trust Company, Rodney Square North, 1100 North Market
Street, Wilmington, Delaware, 19890-0001, Attention: Corporate Trust Administration. 

  

	3.	Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon filing. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate in accordance with Section 3811(a) of the Act. 
  

			
	WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY,
	 as Delaware Trustee

		
	By:	 	 /s/  Christopher J. Slaybaugh

	Name:	 	Christopher J. Slaybaugh
	Title:	 	Assistant Vice President
	
	/s/  G. William Beale
	G. William Beale, Trustee
	
	/s/  D. Anthony Peay
	D. Anthony Peay, Trustee
	
	/s/  Janis Orfe
	Janis Orfe, Trustee
Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1 Filed12/21/12 Page1 of 1Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page1 of 13Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page2 of 13Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page3 of 13Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page4 of 13Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page5 of 13Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page6 of 13Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page7 of 13Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page8 of 13Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page9 of 13Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page10 of 13Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page11 of 13Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page12 of 13Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page13 of 13
} 

I REF ID:A71106 

BCSHIW. B \:..- ?-1, 1) ~ 

9a~tt.eu ot \he Anr leeGl'i\7 A&eno7 THbnteal 

C::.C.\\ee 

WI' lnmln.Jll 

1. l'.t ill "8qtaffted that !Ir .aohn. A. SJai.t.b be appointed t.o _.r8blp en t.M 

ei,,t.opapld.e Saboolalt.t.• ot t.he u., eovl\1 AaenGJ T.abn!O&l Cor,lld,t.t•1 'Wiee 

llr W lftlVl nliewd 

2. lt- la turt.her nquuted that l!r Lo.•14 toll'Nld and Sir It. L seot\ M 

appolated to M11benb1p on t.he C1pboa.y and CUn llbeo-1tt.ee ot \be A~ ..HScu.rlt.y 

lleDCJ !eo!mloal eo.1.tt.ee, de• !ill" 'I !li"IM relined 

H l.. C1Ait1' 

ASS: n.g (;h\!f· ""5r!t.r lvlaion 

~ f"(- I 

L-~· -r l 

RESTRIGTED 

i 

§-1 # 1 I ... i 7 1 

~Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-29-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352A 
.. 

REF ID:A71106 

CROSS HTT'EX 8liE T 

I 

File under ?fo. J'/ OIJL. 

Type or Correspondenao y£e.~-I tfJ. A""" ~ .3 ;>"' 

SubJects 

From· 

Synopsis 

lloOU111ent "1led under No, '1· ;95"9 

CSG.hS I• orn ?

1

0. 67 (Rev 1) 

26 September 1946
-:. . ... .... ~-

·'' .. :.~.-· l .. ~1. 

;,, :·. ~-· 

:'t . 

...• ·,·~ . 

. t' .. 

-~ t'. 

.. 

·l,·· . .,._ 

' . - .. "'""•.-;. ·.,
•. 

• REF ID:A72401 

SECRCT C) 0 T 

DEP.Am'tmlT OF -DEFENSE 

.ARMED FORCES SEC,'tf.RITY AGENCY 

Washington 25, D.c. 

~· ~. 

21May1951 

AFSA•l5 

U,A ORPER NO. 46-SJ. 

1. In connection with the transfer 0£ certain AFSA activities to 

another location, a Movement Executive ·Committee is hereb-1 established 

to furnish coordination and staff guidance and to render dacisions as 

required in the course ot planning and the execution of preliminary dGtails. 

2. The membership of the Movement Executive Committee is as follows: 

Omanization J&em'ber !J. ternate Membg -

AFSA-OOC 

14 

OOF 

12 

15 

17 

173 

02 

02 

03 

04 

Co1. To U. Hetherington, Chairman 

CAPT Thoms H. Dyer 

Mr. Paul Neff 

r.taj. H. c. VanRensselaer 

Lt.Col. Leslie H.. Wyman Lt.Col. Roy E. Doran 

Co1. Charles G. Duft.y 

Co1.- Dale M. King 

Jlr. · tlaurice H. Klein 

Mr. Leo Rosen 

?£ro Frank L. Chittenden 

Mr. J!.iarlc Rhoads 

Lt.Col. E&dn B. Cooper 

Lt.Colo Russell H. Horten 

CDR lames H. Fortune, Ir. 

Col. M. 3. Cottield 

CDR George J. Noack 

Capt. David H. Mendelsohn 

Mr. Thomas F. O•Brietl 

CAPT Seth A. Shepard 

Lt.Col. Ho J. Revene 

3. The Comi ttee will meet at the call of the Chairman. 

EAP.L Eo STONE 

Rear Admift.l.it UaSct Navy 

nt.recrtor 1 Aimed Forces SGlcuri\y Age'if07 

msTRIBUTI<>BI 

Es.ch Office end Staff 

Division Chief - 1 copy 

F.ach individual concerned - 1 cow 

SECREl~ 

cJ ~ .,, 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 01-30 2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

>.
# CE2004084EN.01054001.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/540 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/540

---

(2004/C 84 E/0617)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0130/04

by Caroline Lucas (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(26 January 2004)

Subject:   Fluoridation of drinking water

Subject:

On 25 December 2003 the Drinking Water Directive (98/83/EC (1)), which permits Member States to add fluoride to drinking water, came into force. The benefits and risks of water fluoridation are far from well established, and scientific controversy and health concerns have loomed over the issue for many years.

1

The York Review into the efficacy and safety of the fluoridation of drinking water, commissioned by the British Department of Health in 1999, could not accurately determine the effect of fluoridating water on teeth, because the evidence was of poor quality, contradictory and unreliable. Since then there has been, according to the authors of this review, no other scientifically defensible review to alter its findings.

In light of this and of the fact that in the UK and Ireland some nine million consumers have fluoride added to their drinking water without their consent, what research is the Commission promoting and funding into the safety of water fluoridation? Does the Commission agree that such research is an essential step in enabling Member States to follow the precautionary principle and to prohibit this form of mass-medication, if they so choose?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(16 March 2004)

(16 March 2004)

The matter of fluoridation of water supplies lies within the Member States' responsibility and the Commission is not involved as long as the maximum limit set out in Council Directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption is respected. Fluoridation, like other water treatment processes, is an issue that should be addressed by the national authorities.

The policy that individual Member States follow on this matter depends on a number of factors and takes into account local customs and habits as well as the fact that ingestion of fluoridated compounds may also result from the use of fluoridated toothpastes, fluoride rinses, fluoride treatments in dental offices, food and beverages. At present, the Commission is not promoting nor funding specific research into the safety of water fluoridation.

---

(1)  OJ L 330, 5.12.1998, p. 32.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION





Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of China lithium Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China lithium Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by China lithium Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








Dated: October 13, 2011


/s/ Chunping FangChunping Fang, Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,124
<SECURITIES>                                    13,412
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,369
<ALLOWANCES>                                       783
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,107
<PP&E>                                           5,203
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,807
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,376
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,113
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,252
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,376
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,062
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,352
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,593
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (665)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,782
<INCOME-TAX>                                        25
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,757
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,757
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10


</TABLE>