alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
• 

OCGIB: 9.3/17 

REF rp..;~61 

cJL\JADJ 

~24 

13 December 1954 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF uscm: 

Subject: 

References: 

Extent to Which u.s. COMINT Resources Can Be Applied 

Effectively to Fulfill Requirements of USCIB lA'.aster 

Requirements List. 

(a) USCIB 9.3/8, 18 October 1954. 

(b) USCIB 9.3/11, 4 November 1954. 

(c) USCm 9.3/15, 2 December 1954. 

(d) USCIB 9.3/16, 3 December 1954. 

1. uscm considered the above subject in light of the references, 

at its llOth Meeting on 10 December 1954. 

2. Follo·wing a lengthy discussion of the many facets of the problem, 

it was agreed by the Boa.ied that the matter would be considered without 

delay by USCIBEC, taking into account all papers now before the Board, 

together with a statement of IAC views on the whole priorities problem 

which it is expected will be available for information following IAC 

consideration of the matter at its next meeting. 

3. In its review of the problem USCIBEO will concern itself with the 

entire philoso::;:ihy behind the statement o:f requirements, the merits of the 

present system, known IAC objectives, and an examination or the present 

0apabilities of the National Security Agency, giving specific consideration 

to existing requirements, existing capabilities, and gaps between the two. 

4. To insure that the USCIBEC treatment of the problem is based upon 

consideration of general intelligence, as well as CCMINT, aspects it was 

understood that a:ny member organization deeming it necessary may designate 

a qualified intelligence representative to work w-lth its USCIBEC member. 

5. It was agreed, finally, that USCIBEC recommendations, when 

formulated, will be presented fo~ immediate full Board consideration. 

6. If there is no objection to the above by any member prior to 

Jlose of business Thursday, 16 December 1954 the Executive Committee 

will proceed along the lines indicated. 

USCIB: 9.3/17 SECRET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-04-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B
EXHIBIT 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Creative Technology Ltd.
(the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Ng Keh Long, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Ng Keh LongNg Keh LongChief Financial OfficerDate: October 15, 2004
Exhibit 4








Exhibit 4.1 




SPECIMEN OF COMMON STOCK CERTIFICATE




[________] NUMBER 




SHARES [________]




AUTHORIZED  COMMON STOCK; 100,000,000 SHARES PAR VALUE $.001 NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED BY TRANSFER  AGENT  INCORPORATED  UNDER  THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA Common stock CUSIP THIS CERTIFIES THAT IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF SHARES OF AMERICA’S DRIVING RANGES, INC.’S COMMON STOCK TRANSFERABLE ON  THE BOOKS OF THE CORPORATION IN PERSON OR BY DULY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY  UPON SURRENDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE PROPERLY ENDORSED.




THIS CERTIFICATE IS NOT VALID UNTIL COUNTERSIGNED BY THE TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTERED BY THE REGISTRAR.




Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.




Dated:




[SEAL OF America’s Driving Ranges, Inc.]




/s/ John Birchard, PGA 

John Birchard




/s/ Chris Bellile

Chris Bellile, Secretary

 

 










By:  Patrick Day

       American Registrar and Transfer Company

       Salt Lake City, UT 84107







This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent.




NOTICE:  Signature must be guaranteed by a firm which is a member of a registered national stock exchange, or by a bank (other than a savings bank), or a trust company.




The following abbreviation, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:




TEN COM - as tenants in common 

UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - ____Custodian____  

TEN ENT- as tenants by the entireties    

(Cust) (Minor) JT TEN - as joint tenants with right  under  Uniform Gifts to Minors  of  survivorship  and  not as Act

________________________ tenants in common. 

   (State) 




Additional abbreviation may also be used though not in above list.




FOR VALUE RECEIVED, _________hereby sell,  assign  and  transfer  unto  

PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE -

------------------------------------------------------------- 

________________________________________________________

______  ___ _________ (Please print or typewrite name and address including zip code of assignee) 

________________________________________________________ ______

_______________________________________________________________

______ ___  _________  Shares  of  the  capital stock represented by the within Certificate and do hereby   irrevocably constitute and appoint ________________________________________________________  Attorney  to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of

substitution in the premises.




Dated:




NOTICE: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name  as written upon the face of the Certificate, in every particular, without alteration or enlargement, or any change whatever.

 












II-1
24 

OOOIB: 5.3/46 

20 July 1954 

UNITED STAIES' CQMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE BOA.RD EXECUTIVE CQMMITTEE 

lGENDA FCE. 

Date of Initial 

Consideration 

30 July 1954 

29 April 1954 

30 July 1954 

30 July 1954 

,'.30 July 1954 

Seventeenth Meeting at 1400, on Friday, 30 July 1954, 

in Room 2 E 687, National Defense Building, 

Washington, D. C. -

Captain Rufus L. Taxlor, TBN. Chairman 

Agenda Items 

Subject 

Number§. Subj~c~ 

5.3/ 1. Final Ml.nutes of the 15th and 

16th Meetings. 

13.7/ 2. Emergency Dissemination or COMINT 

to Non-indoctrinated Persons. 

(tBCIB 13.7/24} 

13.8/ 3. Exploitation of Tactical COMINT. 

(USCIB 13.8/22} 

13.7/ 4. Delineation of Categories III, II, 

and I. (tBCIB 13.7/ }* 

9.3/ 5. tBCIB ~ster Requirements (Report 

by' Director, NSA - papers in 

preparation. See USCIB 9.3/5 of 

4 ~an 1954 for reference} 

* Paper to be submitted later if' action completed by INTCOM. 

Submit tecU?z 

Secretariat 

Executive 

Secretary 

ExecutiVl:t 

Secretary 

Executive 

Secretar:r 

Director, NSA 

THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS COMMDNICATIONS INTELLIGE?EE INFORMATION AND SHALL BE H*HBHIB 

O:m.:I UT CHARtS EJ E"d&Sll: ~ J.i!9R 691mf!'1 

E
NSA Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Complaints Data

Posted Pursuant to the No Fear Act

FY21 (4th Quarter)

I. Complaints of Discrimination Filed

Number of Complaints Filed 33

Number of Individuals Filing Complaints 32

Number of Individuals Filing Two or More Complaints 1

II. Bases of Complaints Filed

Age 10

Color 5

Disability 17

National Origin 5

Race 15

Religion 2

Reprisal 6

Sex 10

1. Equal Pay Act 0

2. Pregnancy Discrimination Act 1

III. Issues of Complaints Filed

Assignment of Duties 3

Awards 0

Disciplinary Action 2

Warning 1

Removal 0

Duty Hours 0

Evaluation/Appraisal 2

Examination/Test 0

Harassment (Sexual) 2

(Non-Sexual) 8

Promotion/Non-selection 14

Reasonable Accommodation 0

Reassignment - Denied 2

Termination 3

Terms and Conditions of Employment 6

Time and Attendance 1

Training 2

IV. Average Complaints Processing Time to Completion

All Investigations

1. Hearing Not Requested 86.0

2. Hearing Requested 451.0

Final Actions by Agency
1. Processing Time Without a Hearing/FAD 86.0

2. Processing Time With a Hearing/Final Order 207.67

V. Dismissals

Number of Dismissals 12

Average Days Pending At the Time of Dismissal 225.25

VI. Withdrawals

Number of Complaints Withdrawn by Complainants 4

VII. Findings of Discrimination

Findings Rendered with a Hearing

Number of Findings 0

Findings Rendered without a Hearing

Number of Findings 0

Issues of Findings of Discrimination

Number of Issues 0

Bases of Findings of Discrimination

Number of Bases 0

VIII. Pending Complaints Carried Over From Previous FYs

Complaints Open Any Length of Time During Reporting Year

1. Number of Individuals Filing These Complaints 36

2. Number of These Complaints Currently Pending 36

Status of These Cases:

1. Investigation 12

2. Final Agency Action 2

3. Hearing 17

4. Appeal 6

IX. Complaints Pending Any Length of Time This Fiscal Year Not 

Investigated Within 180 Days (plus any authorized extensions)

0
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 23


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

        As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference into the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of MRV
Communications, Inc. (File No. 33-96458) and into the Registration Statement on
Form S-3 of MRV Communications, Inc. (File No. 333-17537) of our report dated
February 7, 1997 included in the Form 10-K of MRV Communications, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 1996.


                                        /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


                                        ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Los Angeles, California
April 14, 1997
SECRET 

From 

To 

Via 

. . 

: 

: 

REF ID:A65807 

AFSA-34 

AFSA-OOT 

AFSA-03~,.LO;/V 15"JUN $"/;;:: 103~ 

Subject: SOAG 

14 June 1951 

Yesterday Prof. von Neumann visited, arriving about 1020. He talked 

with Eachus, Gleason and me until noon, mostly about MA.RINE and Roberts• 

attack. He had a quick look at GOLD:BERG, HECATE, and PLUTO. 

After lunch we went to the Ball, where we visited Raven, Reimers, 

Besse, Wagner, Shepard, and others, and talked about ALJ3ATROSS until 1600. 

He took this very seriously, noting down some statistics about the amount 

of data available so he could think further about the problem. 

He did not kn.ow about the meeting of July 10 and following, so I 

took the liberty of inviting hilt. He was not sure that his scheduJ.e permitted him to be on the East Coast at that time, but if it does he will 

come. 

In my opinion this was a highly successful visit, with von Neumann 

now definitely interested in the problem on which he might best be expected to make a contribution. 

Slil6H! 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-14-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

-I • -

-- - .. ·-. _ .. _ ... -
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Stephen C. JumperStephen C. JumperPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer) 18
Exhibit 99.1

                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of J Net
Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Allan R. Tessler, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
          of the Company.

Dated: May 15, 2003              By: /s/ Allan R. Tessler
                                 ____________________
                                 Allan R. Tessler
                                 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

     This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 13

- 00765

- CR
Antorr Lamar ALLISON , Appellant

v. The State of The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013CR0 418 Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Karen Angelini, Justice Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Delivered and Filed: September 17, 2014 AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED On April 8, 2013, p ursuant to a plea

- bargain agreement, Antorr Lamar All i s on was sentenced to two years in prison , his sentence was suspended, and he was placed on commu nity supervision for two years. On July 31, 2013, the S tate filed a motion to revoke Allison’s community supervision , alleging All i s on had violated two conditions of his community supervision. After a hearing, the trial court fou nd that All i s on had violated a condition of his community supervision

. The trial court revoked All i s on’s community supervision and sentenced him to two years in prison . Alli s on appeal ed

.04

- 13

- 00765

- CR

Allison’s court

- appointed counsel has file d a brief in which he discusses two potential points of error but nevertheless concludes that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978 ). Counsel states that Allison was provided with copies of the brief and the motion to withdraw, and was further informed of his right to review the re cord and file his own brief. See Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n. 1 (Tex. App.

— Sa n Antonio 1996, no pet.). Allison has not file d a pro se brief. We have reviewed the record and counsel’ s brief, and we agree that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed. Furthermore, we grant the motion to withdraw. See Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 85

– 86 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns , 924 S.W.2d at 177 n. 1. No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Allison wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition fo r discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the later of (1) the date of this opinion; or (2) the date the last timely motion for rehearing is overruled by this court. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review should comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. S ee T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 68.4. Karen Angelini, Justice
DO NOT PUBLISH

- 2

-
Today in Energy

February 17, 2012 

Natural gas pipeline capacity additions in 2011

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration. 

Notes: Capacity data only include interstate and intrastate transmission projects. Storage capacity additions and other 

infrastructure such as gathering and distribution lines are not included. 

The U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that U.S. natural gas pipeline companies added about 2,400 miles of new pipe 

to the grid as part of over 25 projects in 2011. New pipeline projects entered service in parts of the U.S. natural gas grid that can be 

congested: California, Florida, and parts of the Northeast (see map above). Only a portion of this capacity serves incremental natural 

gas use; most of these projects facilitate better linkages across the existing natural gas grid. 

By convention, the industry expresses annual capacity additions as the sum of the capacities of all the projects completed in that year. 

By this measure, the industry added 13.7 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) of new capacity to the grid in 2011. The six largest projects 

put into service in 2011 added 1,553 miles and about 8.2 Bcf/d of new capacity to the system. Much of this new capacity is for 

transporting natural gas between states rather than within states. Golden Pass, Ruby Pipeline, FGT Phase VIII, Pascagoula 

Expansion, and Bison Pipeline projects added 6.1 Bcf/d, or about 80%, of new state-to-state capacity.

Natural gas pipeline capacity additions in 2011 were well above the 10 Bcf/d levels typical from 2001-2006, roughly the same as 

additions in 2007 and 2010, but significantly below additions in 2008 and 2009 (see chart below). Capacity added in 2008 and 2009 

reflected a mix of intrastate and interstate natural gas pipeline expansions, related mostly to shale production, liquefied natural gas 

(LNG) terminals, and storage facilities. 

http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=5050

8/31/2015
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Notes: Capacity data only include interstate and intrastate transmission projects. Storage capacity additions and other 

infrastructure such as gathering and distribution lines are not included. 

http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=5050

8/31/2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-01-1999
<CASH>                                         337,964
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,236,371
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (22,600)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,380,542
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,201,102
<PP&E>                                       5,607,781
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,081,337)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,336,772
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,196,632
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,225
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,863,763
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,336,772
<SALES>                                     12,088,582
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,104,808
<CGS>                                        7,396,507
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,764,463
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             303,319
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                685,076
<INCOME-TAX>                                   257,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            427,376
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   427,376
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11




</TABLE>
# CE2004088EN.01067601.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/676 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/676

---

(2004/C 88 E/0694)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0007/04

by Philip Claeys (NI) to the Commission

(16 January 2004)

Subject:   Accession of Cyprus, official languages

Subject:

Cyprus has two official languages, Greek and Turkish. The Constitution also says that one of the two Vice-Presidents must be a Turkish Cypriot. Because of the Turkish occupation of the northern part of the island, however, these constitutional provisions are not in force. In the current circumstances, recognition of Turkish as an official language in the European Union could be interpreted as implicit recognition of the Turkish occupation of the northern part of Cyprus.

Might the accession of Cyprus on 1 May 2004 – if there is no change in the institutional and political situation – nonetheless mean that the Turkish will become an official language of the European Union? If so, on the basis of what arguments does the Commission arrive at this view?

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(1 March 2004)

(1 March 2004)

According to the Treaty of Accession 2003 Turkish is not an official language of the European Union, since no such request had been made.

Following a political settlement of the Cyprus problem and a re-unification of the island, the United Cyprus Republic is entitled to request that Turkish is recognised as an official Community language. The Council would then have to amend Regulations no. 1/1958/EEC and 1/1958/Euratom determining the languages to be used by the two Communities (1). The legal base for this adaptation and the modalities related to it would be Article 4 of Protocol No 10 of the Act of Accession, which stipulates that the Council shall decide, in the event of a settlement, on the adaptations to the terms concerning the accession of Cyprus with regard to the Turkish Cypriot Community.

1

It should be noted that the Commission decided in 1999 to dedicate EUR 3 million for the translation of the ‘acquis’ into Turkish in order to prepare and facilitate the process of bringing the northern part of Cyprus closer to the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ B 17, 6.10.1958.

1

---
Consent of Registered Independent Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and StockholdersRevlon, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-116160) on Form  S-8 and (No. 333-128815) on Form S-3 of Revlon, Inc. of our report dated March  13,  2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Revlon, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December  31,  2006 and 2005, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ deficiency and comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December  31,  2006 and the related financial statement schedule, and our report on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December  31,  2006, which reports appear in the December  31,  2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Revlon, Inc. Our report refers to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (‘‘SFAS’’) No. 123(R), ‘‘Share-Based Payment,’’ as of January  1,  2006, and SFAS No. 158, ‘‘Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post-retirement Plans – An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R),’’ as of December  31,  2006.

/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New YorkMarch 13, 2007

----