alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas EmissionsMeeting Documentation: IBMDate Staff Contact Information Name of Organization Summary of Discussion WrittenCommentsProvided?Did they alsosubmit toDocket?Date sent toEPA- CCDJune 8, 2010 Scott Bartos(202) 343-9167bartos.scott@ epa.gov• Outside participantsidentified below.• EPA Climate ChangeDivision and EPAcontractors: ScottBartos, EPA; DebHarris, ICFInternational; ShepBurton, ICFInternational.Participants presented work on theuncertainty analysis and a proposal forgas apportioning models.The presentation and the modelingproposal are available in the docket.IBM submittedcomments tothe docket.Outside Participants:Michele Bolz, IBM, mmbolz@us.ibm.comAndy Brendler, IBM,brendler@us.ibm.comJay Dietrich, IBM, jdietric@us.ibm.comStephanie Smallwood, IBM, swsmallw@us.ibm.comDave Speed, IBM, speed@us.ibm.com
" e 

DISPOSITION FORM 

FILE NO SUBJECT 

Clearance of Advisory Board Member ~~~~~~~~-· 

FROM 

SEC 

DATE COMMENT NO 1 

9 June 53 

Capt Young/60251/sr 

TO S/ASST 

ATTN: Dr. Fn.edman 

1. Information in office of SEC incb.cates that William B. Shockley, whom 

you are considering for AdVl.sory Board memberslu.p, has been a member of a cited 

subversive organization and in addition was a member of another organization 

wlu.ch, although not cited,, is known to be infJ.ltrated by communists. It is 

possible that such association could be satisfactorily e:xplained but tlu.s will 

require investigation. Should it be shown that Dr. Shockley still approves of 

these orgam.zations, then we could not clear him. ' 

I 

2. SEC recoillillez.ids against clearance but if you desire .further action, we 

JlDlSt have a completed PHS and fingerprint card. 

ku {jJ, 

LESLIE H. :.~ Colonel, Arti~ Chief, Security Division 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-10-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a ~
UNI T E D S T A T ES E N V IR O NM E N T A L P R O T E C T I O N A G E N CY

M EM O R AND UM

S U BJ E CT : O u t reac h t o L a s V e g a s P a i u t e R e g ar d i n g E P A P r o pos a l t o R e d e s i g n a te

C oun t y t o A pp r ov a l f

o r t h e 1997 8

F R OM : G i n g e r V a g e n a s

T O : F il e

O n N ov em b er

1, 2012, A m y Z im p fer

S t e ph e n G ill o f t h e L a s V e g a s P a i u t e t r i b e . M r

. G ill w a s no t i n.

l e tti n g h im kno w w e w o u l d b e p r opos i n g t o a p p r o v e Cl ar

k C oun t y 's p l a n t o m a i n t a i n t h e g ood a i r

qu a li t y t h a t h a s b e e n a c h i e v e d a nd r e d e s i g n a ti n g t h e ar e a t o a tt a i n m e n t

. S h e a l so le

t h a t t h ere w ou l d b e a

30- d a y c o mm e n t p er i od on o u r p r opos e d a c ti on, a nd t h a t i f t h e y w a n t e d t o

c onsu lt w it h us, w e w ou l d b e h a p p y t o s e t t h a t up

, t hou g h t h e y a re no t r e q u i re d t o do so. S h e l ef t

h im bo t h h er

phon e nu m b er a nd R o y F o rd

Cl ar k C oun t y h a d c on t a c t e d M ar

k R ub er

,

a bou t t h e p l a n l a t er i n t h e d a y

.

UNI T E D S T A T ES E N V IR O NM E N T A L P R O T E C T I O N A G E N CY

R E G I O N I X

75 H a w t ho r ne St r ee t

S an F r a n c i s c o , CA 9 4105

N ov e m b er

8, 201 2

O u t reac h t o L a s V e g a s P a i u t e R e g ar d i n g E P A P r o pos a l t o R e d e s i g n a te

C oun t y t o A pp r ov a l f

o r t h e 1997 8 -H ou r O z on e S t a nd ar d

b er 1, 2012, A m y Z im p fer

, A i r D i v i s i on A sso c i a t e D i r ec t o r

, U S E P A Re g i on

o f t h e L a s V e g a s P a i u t e t r i b e . M r

. G ill w a s no t i n. Ms. Z im p fer l ef t a vo i ce m e s s a g e

l e tti n g h im kno w w e w o u l d b e p r opos i n g t o a p p r o v e Cl ar

k C oun t y 's p l a n t o m a i n t a i n t h e g ood a i r

qu a li t y t h a t h a s b e e n a c h i e v e d a nd r e d e s i g n a ti n g t h e ar e a t o a tt a i n m e n t

. S h e a l so le t h im

d a y c o mm e n t p er i od on o u r p r opos e d a c ti on, a nd t h a t i f t h e y w a n t e d t o

c onsu lt w it h us, w e w ou l d b e h a p p y t o s e t t h a t up

, t hou g h t h e y a re no t r e q u i re d t o do so. S h e l ef t

R o y F o rd ’ s pho n e nu m b er

. S h e no t e d t h a t sh e w a s a w a r e t h a t

oun t y h a d c on t a c t e d M ar

k R ub er

, a nd t h a t M ar

k w a s p l a nn i n g t o t a l k w it h C h a i r m a n Tso Cl a r k

g i on 9, c a ll e d

l ef t a vo i ce m e s s a g e

l e tti n g h im kno w w e w o u l d b e p r opos i n g t o a p p r o v e Cl ar

k C oun t y 's p l a n t o m a i n t a i n t h e g ood a i r

h im kno w

d a y c o mm e n t p er i od on o u r p r opos e d a c ti on, a nd t h a t i f t h e y w a n t e d t o

c onsu lt w it h us, w e w ou l d b e h a p p y t o s e t t h a t up

, t hou g h t h e y a re no t r e q u i re d t o do so. S h e l ef t

sh e w a s a w a r e t h a t

a nd t h a t M ar

k w a s p l a nn i n g t o t a l k w it h C h a i r m a n Tso
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1



                                   LYCOS, INC.

  COMPUTATION OF SHARES USED IN COMPUTING BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE
                                   (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  THREE MONTHS       THREE MONTHS
                                                                     ENDED              ENDED
                                                               OCTOBER 31, 1999    OCTOBER 31, 1998
                                                               ----------------    ----------------

<S>                                                            <C>                 <C>
  Common stock, beginning of period.........................        94,891,910           71,982,903
  Weighted average common shares
    issued during the period, net...........................           677,408           11,836,996
  Common stock options and warrants
      using the modified treasury method....................

                                                               ----------------    ----------------
                                                                    95,569,318           83,819,899
                                                               ===============      ===============
Net loss....................................................      $(27,522,365)         $(3,595,933)
                                                               ===============      ===============
Basic and diluted net loss per share (1)....................      $      (0.29)         $     (0.04)
                                                               ===============      ===============
</TABLE>


(1)  Diluted net loss per share was not materially different from basic net loss
     per share.
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Annual Report on Form 10-K of Revlon, Inc. (the"Company") for the period ended December 31,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas E. McGuire,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

/s/ Thomas E.McGuire                     Thomas E.McGuireChief Financial OfficerMarch 10,2005

----
MEMO .ING SLIP I NAME OR TITLE 

, ·:nc---= - .,.,, ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION 

2 

3 

A 

FROM NAME OR TITLE 

INITIALS 

DATE 

DATE 

___ :;r_ 

CIRCULATE 

COORDINATION 

FILE 

INFORMATION 

NECESSARY ACTION 

NOTE AND RETURN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION TELEPHONE 

roved for Release b NSA on 04-14-2014 ursuant to E.O. 1352 

DD FORM 9 5 Replecos D.~ \00 Form !111.i, I Apr 48, and AFRQ 1 FEB 50 Form 12, 10 Nov 47, wb1ch may be used. CIHl IOll • 0 826564
~ l'<D-Di Ana SRCUIM AGIBC! BCmCAL ~ 

. stJJJICT: Itev1w ct Int.crcept en6l D/8 ~arch em ~lopment ~3eets 

a. D.S 6.ated 16 Jte~ lgbg from 86l<srete1.i7 ASATO, to Cbairmdn, Inter ... capt amt Dil'ection 1'1DBilQ8 Subcmrdttea, su'bJoot: 119'11n of 1RH8&J>cb ana Dsvel@l)a 

ment Pro.jeotra. 

'b; Bztrmct from DS t!aw4 25 1'cftmbm'1 19'8-7 from AS..efi., to ASa70,, 

Sub3ect, JM JReparrtiDS Sfatem frH lteHl!.l"Ch and: ~1cpmnt Act1w1 t1~8J, AS·7l 

f:lle 1'umber 3706, lRDB General OCi"X"eaponailence. 

o. \far Deparimect Ci&"Cular ll.26.11 Reaearch an6l. ~ell.t1p11ent, cma ClassU'i· 

caticm oil Material, Section III Pangraph 13 •. 

do WU' Jeapertment CircU'll.ar 711 Section n:,aawa 18 OOarcb 1947. 

a. mec1ea Concemd 

(1.) · J>i:rectiq . Al§anc1: ArflEt Securi t: Aseno1 

(2) Other Intfitestecl Asenciee: :la.Tl, us.a 

' 

'b. Ppr;pcse 

'lt'o insure cen.f'ormitf v1-th the ~ cf the ArQ 1lleaearch and 

Development Pl"OgNm, to elimimw i'tlPlicatin>a an4 mprccl11Cti..-. acti'ri.tes, to 

1naure records ~ all PDO.jects are apt cur:rent, ~ to 111J~ PJrompt actim on 

.all completed pro.1ecta. · 

3. ~'l'IC&J: 

.. 

'l'he SubcODlll!ttee roo0111Den4a tbat: 

a. The following tm'03ecta be continued and. the assigned tm"ioritioa 

remain the aame as indicated. 

~ ~o,1ect Bo. 

29.30 ... 001 »9-32-~ 

'29-32-008 

29 .. 32 ... 009 

29.32..013 

29.32 ... 01a. 

·Title 

Oemral Beeearoh Intercept Bqmpment l-C 

ac.6-9 Cbalzmel Damull.tiplu:er 2..i 

J>mable Current Cable Code Equipment 2-3 

Three Channel Printer Equipment, .AS.AK 8 l...C ttwo~l Bleotronic Danmlt1plexer,ASAB 6 l~ 

GOJ.J'MLL .ASAB 5 1-B 

eclassifi ed and a roved or release b NS on 08-07-2013 ursuantt E .0. 1352 
,_ 

REF ID:A58185-

S£8fifl. 

b. The f'cllotd11g proJects be continued ad the UIBligned Pt"ioritiea ·• cbanpd as incU1cated: 

Bme. 

4. The :f"olLlawiiQg proje~ be cemeelllri.: 

lf CVl'llll • 

1'hen are no exhibits to this rep«rt. 

5. COORDlltAflOB: 

Colllt'd1nat1oo vas accomplished with the fcllovtDa asenctea: 

None.
#### Zipp Manufacturing Company, Respondent, vs. Pastorino and others, Appellants.

*December 11, 1903*

January *12, 1904.*

*Sale of chattels: Opportunity for test: U,se of unnecessary quantity.*

Where goods are sold under an agreement that they may' he returned if, upon fair test, they do not prove satisfactory, the-purchaser, in making the test, can use such quantity only as is fairly and reasonably necessary to determine their quality, and if he uses more than such quantity he makes the goods his own and loses the right of rejection.

Appeax, from a judgment of tbe superior court of Milwaukee county: J. 0. Ludwig, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

For tbe appellants there was a brief by *Boemer &*Aarons, and oral argument by *C. L. Aarons.*

For tbe respondent there was a brief by Miller, *Noyes &*Miller, and oral argument by W. *B. Hiclcman.*

WiNSiow, J.

This is an action to recover tbe purchase price of a barrel of vanilla sold by tbe plaintiff to tbe defend*177ants, who were wholesale manufacturers of candy, under an agreement that if, upon fair test, it did not prove satisfactory it might be returned. The defense was that the vanilla was of poor quality and proved unsatisfactory upon a test being, made, and was returned. A verdict for the plaintiff was directed on the ground that the evidence showed without dispute that the defendants had accepted the vanilla by using in their business a far larger amount than was reasonably necessary for testing purposes. Examination of the evidence shows that the direction was plainly right. It appeared without dispute that a satisfactory test could be made by the use of a few ounces; also that the defendants used from four to six ounces daily in the manufacture of candy for a period of more than six weeks, during which time they made and sold about three tons of candy flavored with the vanilla, although by their own admissions they discovered that it was not satisfactory after making the first test. For testing purposes they could only use such quantity as was fairly and reasonably necessary to determine its quality. *Cream City C. Co. v. Friedlander,*84 Wis. 53, 54 N. W. 28. When they went beyond this, as they unquestionably did in this case, they made it their own, and lost the right of rejection.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
# CE2004078EN.01061701.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/617 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/617

---

(2004/C 78 E/0651)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3631/03

by Proinsias De Rossa (PSE) to the Commission

(5 December 2003)

Subject:   Consultation with charities with regard to the proposal relating to the imposition of VAT on postal services

Subject:

As the Commission is aware, the proposal to impose VAT on postal services (1) will have serious financial consequences for charities. What consultations did the Commission undertake with charitable organisations, particularly those from Ireland, concerning the implications of this move prior to the publication of its proposal in May 2003? How was the outcome of any such consultations taken into account in the Commission's final proposal?

1

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(28 January 2004)

(28 January 2004)

The Commission was engaged in a long consultation process prior to making its proposal on postal services. The Commission would like to assure the Honourable Member that charities, as well as other customers of direct mail, were in fact consulted. Irish Charities were represented in that process. As early as mid 2000, Commission officials were already discussing the effects of introducing VAT on the postal sector with the European Committee on VAT (of which the Irish Cancer Society is a member), as well as with many other groups and bodies representing postal consumers. As a result of those consultations, the Commission included an optional reduced rate (which Ireland could set at 5 %) and widened the scope of that option in order to include direct mail, something of interest to charities. The possibility given to Member States of introducing a reduced rate together with the savings resulting from the right to deduct for public postal operators, would broadly neutralise any increase in postal prices.

---

(1)  COM(2003)234.

1

---
f 

l . .. \ : ~ ~ .. 't.1·· -~ 

. ·•. ~ ..... 

. . . ;?f}: -~~~;t~ - j.I. -~• '" .. : ~ t' •;~ •,• 

-· ;.,
- REF ID :A522729 

STANDARD FORM NO. 64 

Office Memorandum • uNrTED sTATEs GovERNMENT 

TO Mr. Friedman, .A]'SA-00'1' DATE:25 Jen51 

FROM Mr. Rowlett, .AFSA-02A2 

suBJECT: Attached drafts 

Herev1th a:re 3 -copies of the draft paper you aslmd me tor yeaterd.81'. 

The attached copies are for you., Dr. Sinkov, end Mr. Jones. I have 

given Capt. Dyer a cow m.yself'. 

c. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-10-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

----------------------
• EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

2. Jiran an over-au consideration it is concl.uded that if the French 

) . ~~~ ~ 1plomat1c cryptographic systems are to be 1mproved.1tae tel:WWille i:a neceasary: A I\ 

a. Rfl>lace the current Freno~ ~plcmatio ,/Yet.ems with secure systems; ( 

b. P:rov1de e.dequate training in the new system.a :f'or French o:cyptosraphic personnel; 

o. lsta.bl1ah app;ropriate C01IDIW1icatiana security.proceaurea 1n the 

I' 

French FQl'eign Office~ 1 J '') I 
2 

cl. Maintain oa.refl.l.l. t.eohnioal. superT1a1Gn over the ~ ~pl.outio o.._,n,oa.Uona. 

}. In r~d to the OIU"1"eJlt J'renoh systca, it is ecmcluded that •-

....,.., Jrmch cryptographic praotices in qstam deeign and d.iatributian 

a79W. atto.rclins &U9late C7Ptogre.ph1o nou.ri v. It 1a also oonolnu4 

~ 4<) ~do-WV.. that,li~bO intn\ll•tll' used one-time pad iv~.) DC>De ot the J'rmob. 

)tploatio CU7Pt.osr"8Ph1C qat.u paasusfsuttioient inherent aeauri"Qr to 

.JI; ~ 

,...S.t ••• iD.Jlrovment to a point W.re -. ray be ocaidered aooeptab:i.. ~ ~ 

It 1a tare:fore :n.oea11a7 to diaoarcl the 01UTent rqstems and replace the 

It.. In regarcl to 2b, 20, am 24 above, the ourrent practto. ot tb9 

JIJoeJloh Hft' a lack or a:ureo1at1on GD tllair part ot tM impertSAoe ot theM 

11' adet.uate WIAU"'9a an to be iDAugu.rated 1n regard to these points. 

5. In Tin' ot th9 tcresoiag, it 1• oonolnd4td that e. ccaplete 11hcH-

~'- ~ o1-an1ng" of the J'rmah er,pt;oez-aphio lerthe~ .k' »•asary. This vou.ld 

ilrrolft not onl1' informing# the French '\Jlat their present e,yst-.e are oenYCMl4. 'be prOTided with ap:sr0»riate technical esa1st.anoe to mabla them. to 

fO~ 3ECRET//$1 
reergm1ae their arn»tosraph1c aervioe to 1.naure MOIU"e handl.inB of CMl'P'IJD1 .. 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

eatiou. PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

T. The Bt-1t1ah 1n t.be }>eat haTe ha4 UDl" oon"8ota with the llrench 

E 3.3(h)(2) 

86.-36/50 USC 3605 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

\

,i·. 1_l ,· I ~ I J I I 

I • 

~' i .: 

..-2.e• an the an.q loaere. I.f, however, the French ai-e mJ.1 

part1el.J.y penetrated, the aotion diaoueaed e.bOTe v1ll be ot advantep 1n 

~ .. Jt.ft~i th&t 1t vUl looallae and ocmeequentl.T wtut+t&0 'Iha 1nfQl"Jllat1on obta.1ne4 

/\. 

b;r 1h• 1\J.aa.1a.ne t~ & t--t t tJ T ~~·4J-...ct~ , 

., 

I 

I ~ , '
Order entered May 29, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 13 - 00401 - CV JOANN ADELE BROOKS, Appellant V. PAUL HEDLEY BATCHELO R, Appellee On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR10 - 1373 - 2 

### O RDER The Court has before it appellant’s May 17, 2013 and May 22, 2013 letters to the Court and appellee’s May 23, 2013 response to the May 17 letter. The Court INSTRUCTS appellant that factual statements and submissions will only be co nsidered by the Court if they are part of the clerk’s record, the reporter’s record, or any supplemental record. Appellee’s request for sanctions is DENIED

. /s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
# CE2004084EN.01015101.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/151 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/151

---

(2004/C 84 E/0188)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0019/04

by Juan Ferrández Lezaun (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(9 January 2004)

Subject:   Júcar-Vinalopó project

Subject:

On 16 December 2003, Commissioners Barnier and Wallström informed Parliament of the approval of the Júcar-Vinalopó hydrographic project, subject to it being totally independent of the diversion of the Ebro and compliant with the framework water directive.

On 18 December, at a press conference, Mr Pascual Fernández, the Spanish secretary of state responsible for water, said in reply to a question that the only option ruled out was that of ‘using the Júcar-Vinalopó channels to transport water to the Ebro’, and that, in any case, ‘there are many other rivers in the Júcar basin and the document refers only to the Júcar, not the basin’.

What is the Commission's position on these statements by the Spanish government? Can it confirm that diversions of water from the Ebro basin to the Júcar basin could be financed using Community funds?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(5 February 2004)

(5 February 2004)

The Commission has re-checked the position with the Spanish authorities and can confirm that there will be no transfer of water from the River Ebro into the catchment/river basin of the river Jucar. However, the Jucar river basin district which contains many rivers in addition to the river Jucar, is still scheduled to receive water from the proposed Ebro transfer. The confusion on this issue arises from the mixing up, on the one hand, of the term ‘the Jucar catchment/river basin’ which covers the river Jucar and its tributaries and, on the other hand, the ‘Jucar river basin district’ which is an aggregation of river basins which have been grouped together for administrative reasons.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 24.2

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned director of Sycamore Networks, Inc. hereby constitutes and
appoint Gururaj Deshpande, Daniel E. Smith and Frances M. Jewels, and each of
them singly, my true and lawful attorneys with full power to them, and each of
them singly, with full powers of substitution and resubstitution, to sign for me
and in my name in the capacity indicated below, the Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (file no. 333-84635) and any and all pre-effective and post-effective
amendments to said Registration Statement, and any subsequent Registration
Statement for the same offering which may be filed under Rule 462(b), and
generally to do all such things in my name and on my behalf in my capacity as
director to enable Sycamore Networks, Inc. to comply with the provisions of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and all requirements of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming my signature as it may be
signed by my said attorneys, or any of them, or their substitute or substitutes,
to said Registration Statement and any and all amendments thereto or to any
subsequent Registration Statement for the same offering which may be filed under
Rule 462(b).

     Signed this 24th day of September, 1999.

                                              /s/ John W. Gerdelman
                                              --------------------------
                                              John W. Gerdelman
[KPMG LOGO]
                KPMG LLP
                345 Park Avenue
                New York, NY 10154




            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (No. 333-03224, No. 333-45415, No. 333-06785 and No. 333-42226) and
Form S-8 (No. 33-49017, No. 33-98210 and 333-49017) of AXA Financial, Inc. of
our report dated February 24, 2006, with respect to the statements of income,
changes in partners' capital and comprehensive income and cash flows of
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. for the year ended December 31, 2005, which
report. is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 2007.



/s/ KPMG LLP
New York, New York
March 12, 2008




             KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the
          U.S. member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative