alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
As a result of in-house discussions with the

WEEXLY DIARY TEMS - Lazaa
SSSLDEARY TENS ~-LBZGA
10 September Thra 16 September 59
(u) Commmication Satellite Program

The definitisation of Contract AF 0b(6K7)-K76 18 proceding on echedute. The
Ae a cacants and the BMD comments have been received and furnished te CHR”

coy ata tat & straight CPFF contract 1s considered more advantascous teen

reports, both of which must be furnished by

minor changes and an additional Exhibit "3" for

(U) contracts with space Technology Laboratories, Inc.

1. Contract AF 04(647)-302 ABLE.
meeting to definitize CCN #1 was

2. Contract AF 0h4(647)-361. Ho progress .
fimning up a negotiation schedule except for a tentative agreement from BMD
technic:

to have their

‘al comments back by

ing both the cost and price analysis they

in working in these

negotiations with the:

schedule will be worked out next week.

3-4 (NASA BE-6). ‘The latest negotiations
held with S7 on 10 September. As a result
technical and cost discussions, the Air Force proposed that
at no change in estimated cost end fixed fee. This

that. their negotiatior could collaborate

23 September. Since LBPY ig perform-
ere experiencing a little difficulty
‘iy other commitments. A negotiation
# CE2004084EN.01024201.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/242 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/242

---

(2004/C 84 E/0286)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3468/03

by Bart Staes (Verts/ALE), Phillip Whitehead (PSE), Catherine Stihler (PSE) and Margrietus van den Berg (PSE) to the Council

(21 November 2003)

Subject:   Post-polio syndrome

Subject:

During two meetings of the Council of the European Union, the 2384th (Health, 15.11.2001, Brussels) and the 2470th (Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs, 2-3.12.2002), the Council took note of statements made by the Belgian Presidency and the Irish delegation on the need for action at EU level to provide an adequate response to sufferers of post-polio syndrome (PPS).

Can the Council comment on the kind of action which has already been taken on this matter, more specifically, on the level of:

| 1. | information about the incidence of PPS within the EU, its onset, and availability of current research; |
| --- | --- |

1.

information about the incidence of PPS within the EU, its onset, and availability of current research;

| 2. | treatment available in the Member States for PPS sufferers to rehabilitate them and remedy their condition. |
| --- | --- |

2.

treatment available in the Member States for PPS sufferers to rehabilitate them and remedy their condition.

| 3. | What funds for research and treatment have been made available from the Community budget? In the absence of any such action hitherto, what is the justification for this lack of follow-up? |
| --- | --- |

3.

What funds for research and treatment have been made available from the Community budget? In the absence of any such action hitherto, what is the justification for this lack of follow-up?

Reply

(11 March 2004)

(11 March 2004)

The Honourable Members' attention is drawn to the fact that the organisation and delivery of health services and medical care is the Member States' responsibility and that therefore the Council is not competent to comment on any action already taken on post-polio syndrome at the national or regional levels.

As regards any information on the incidence of post-polio syndrome and funding for research at the European level, the Honourable Members may wish to address their specific questions on this matter directly to the Commission, which is responsible for, inter alia, the implementation of the programme of Community action in the field of public health (2003-2008). The scope of this programme includes actions and support measures aimed at improving health information and knowledge.

---
# CE2004084EN.01088601.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/886 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/886

---

(2004/C 84 E/0979)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0819/04

by Paulo Casaca (PSE) to the Commission

(15 March 2004)

Subject:   The European School in Amsterdam

Subject:

Parents of a number of pupils, as well as teachers at the European School in Amsterdam have expressed deep concern at the Netherlands authorities' announced cut in public funding for the school, apparently the result of a decision to cut subsidies for basic-level foreign language teaching.

The Portuguese authorities claim that they provide funding for a school in Portugal where Dutch is taught, and hence would expect reciprocal treatment, and have so far refused to take over the task of funding from the Netherlands.

Since teaching the language of the country of origin in primary schools is vital in facilitating freedom of movement and is practised and funded by substantial Community appropriations for the European school system, this issue is bound to be of interest to the Community institutions.

Can the Commission therefore say whether it does not consider that a legislative initiative should be launched in the form of a policy strategy providing guidelines for the Member States in this sphere, or any other initiative aimed at avoiding mutual shirking of responsibility and helping to ensure that language teaching may continue, as it is extremely important for communication and freedom of movement in Europe?

Answer given by Ms Reding on behalf of the Commission

(29 April 2004)

(29 April 2004)

On the basis of the information provided, the question concerns the organisation of education systems. As it is, according to Article 149 of the EC Treaty, responsibility for the content of teaching and the organisation of education systems lies with the Member States. The role of the Commission in the area of education is to encourage cooperation between Member States and to support and supplement their action.

Nevertheless, it should be mentioned that, on 25 July 1977, the Council adopted Directive 77/486/EEC on the education of the children of migrant workers (1). This Directive is concerned with promoting improvements in the conditions of freedom of movement for workers as regards the reception and education of their children, and underlines how important it is for host Member States to take appropriate measures, in conjunction with the Member States of origin, to promote the teaching of the mother tongue and of the culture of the country of origin of such children, with a view principally to facilitating their possible reintegration into the Member State of origin. The Commission has no plans to put forward any new legislative proposals.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 199, 6.8.1977.

1

---
REF ID:A517194 

..-.... 

I should like to say to the members of the UK Delegation that they 

should not worry too much about the possible personal consequences that 

may follow from the cryptologic conflict which General Canine mentioned 

earlier. Should any of them develop any occupational psychoses as the 

result of this conference, there is a fine mental hospital here in Washington, 

operated by the Federal Government and called St. Elizabeth• s Hospital, 

which has had a lot of experience in curing similar disorders that now and 

then attend participation in the official business of the U.S. Government. 

What we have to do this time is to settle, once for all, and agree 

upon a program which we together should adopt for the purpose of improving 

the communications security of certain of our allies in NATO and by so doing 

enhance secuiii. ty of our own natipns. You in the UK have prepared a position 

have also 

paper and a course of action to accomplish this aim; we/prepared a paper, 

including a proposed course of action, am. hope to have your help in arriving 

at a firm position. It is interesting at the moment to note that the course 

of action you propose and the one we have tentatively suggested have the 

same ultimate aim and effect: the two courses appear to differ only as to 

method. When we come to examine them closely we may find that the, -differences 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 02-28-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

iit~ .. 1·_.1· .1m. , 
• REF ID:A517194 

in our tow proposed approaches are not too extreme. I am sure that the 

next few days of hard and intelligent exertion by all of us will result 

in an agreed position which is workable and practicable, and will result 

in a successful completion of our mission.
REF ID:A72075 

Dr. C. :B. !o11pld1u1 

Jfa\ton."'..l ~ of St~arda 

h•t1\ute for Jrumrloal A.ntll.7d• 

adnn!ty of Od1forn11\ 

«>5 1111.llard Annue 

Lo• An.gel•• 24• O~i!ornt~ 

Serlal.1 3~242 

1 :.;ri3 

'!'he rur;--ose of tht 11 lettor fa to ru\ on record vh.s.t ! imderete.nd we 

agre~ on 1u:rinf; om- tP.l~hone e<lnY~?'M.tion of 13 .lprtl. ani to brln& 

,ou. t. Oa1rn.s and Ir. hied.Mn up-to-dti.te Oil the HCUrlt7 Ritua.Uon tor 

SCJJG>. 

!hare &!"!'9ar \o be \brae elenl°!'lnce • tnYOl Ted in SCAJJ.P t 

1. A lo~lty eheck con4ucted b7 the Oi1'il SerYioe Collll'!'Jee!on. 

Ml' uader•tNlding i• tb.llt JOU a1'9 &l"!'aJl&fng ~or clen.rance• or t1'J)e (l) 

~ be oonduo'-4 through Corona. J&A-16 l• eondueUng clen.nnce~ of 

\1J>t1 ( 3). 1t.1ul t &ho wirt.el'8tud th"t there t • agreel!!flnt between the 

Comterce n.rp,-.rti:wit and WU. tbat recutl'Mlllt• tor clee.ranoe (2) v111 be 

eaU stied on the 009ple\ion of' ol•Pranc•• of \1'f'e ( 3) through ~.t;:R'!~T. 

It 1• al.o iq 11Drler1t.@l.n<i!.ng th""t )'OU haw recefYecl clh2'Meee of 

\JP9 (1) for 1tll prolpMUTe -bere of SCAJCP exoept Dilworth. Pall. 

Albert and M. Ball. staee 7ov. 9tated \h!.t ;iou recelTe4 a tira n.9gl'l.Un 

oa Dllworth f'roa Oinl Senic• I hsTe aaked. JISA-16 to look into thia 

ma\\er and \o Me vb&\ c:m }.'Oedbl.1' be deroptol"7. l h&Te &190 informe4 

\Ma ~t tt 1• ov .Unt&n4ing th.'l't lttlworth h&a ~ •q.• ol~oe vi\h 

the ilC. t hope 7011 are proo..Unc with 01Tl1 Senica on the other ~ .. 

I 'baT• J•t reoeiWHl a reco.-ndatton. from ISA-16 Uaat Morria Nevraan 

be clropped froa further eoaa14era.\lon. as a S!'.A.\9> pa.rlletpdt. !he7 tleo 

inclurl• \filllaa 7eller ta th!• reoo.-ndation.. In &d.d1Uon. I 1nfor119d 

,ou oa \M pboae tbft.t;_JrS.A,-1.1 la not phpJU"ad to go be,.ond SMRE'f in the 

clearance ot A. I .. Hotfmaa. 

@'pp roved for Release bv NSA on 02-18-2014 pursuant to E .0. 1352\3 
- REF ID:A72075 • 

Sert.al I 3 ~ 2 4 2 

Peaila« vo:rd. trotft: you ol' Odrn• t aa detar aot.htag about ~ • 

a11tt htflMll. liow9Yert I ~ct itice io palat em t.Ju.t ss~16 i.a en' 

a off boa ~-. I.eq:t.lnnet;r, ~r ID\ »~. fbese axe llle 

ftl7 peo))l• la th& Uni\94 St.at.w who. \e 1111 kaovleB«e. 4o ~J'k: on oom-- ~M»rttt. 1fhnt h. aoept tor JMIOYl• d ~. li1\h th!~ tho~\ I 

h.D ... l~. 

:s. • . ,. • w m. :c.n 

Chi•t ila~Uc.al ltnearoh D1T1 tioa 

Oftice of .ae .. ~.l'Ob and. DitY•lopment 

OCI !I.~;. S. Cairn& 

Mr. hied.man, S/ASS! ~­

Oapt. !.ay Young, ll!A.-16 

Memo !or lteeord: Self-explanatory 

Orig: R.A.Leibler/as/15 April 1953 

BSS/B.m. 20200/60572
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10Q FOR
THE QUARTER ENDING MAY 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                       6,577,874
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,348,145
<ALLOWANCES>                                   501,595
<INVENTORY>                                  4,012,636
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,128,119
<PP&E>                                      28,315,053
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,947,508
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,677,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,547,210
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       224,684
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,988,241
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,677,035
<SALES>                                     22,379,993
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,501,407
<CGS>                                        9,968,539
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,968,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,936,494
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,767
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              56,741
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,678,880
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,434,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,244,880
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,244,880
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12


</TABLE>
----

(2004/C 84 E/0452)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0415/04

by Jonas Sjöstedt (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(17 February 2004)

Subject:   Review of decision on Norrmejerier

Norrmejerier is building an installation for the processing of whey, biological purification of waste water and production of green energy. The project period has been extended to 31 November 2004, but Norrmejerier needs a further six months to get the installation into shape and complete its final report. The installation will be operational in April 2005. It cannot be absolutely guaranteed that a final report will be ready by that date, and Norrmejerier has accordingly sought an extension until 31 May. This construction project is excellent from the environmental point of view: it will reduce the use of fossil fuel and alleviate the greenhouse effect.

The payment of support to Norrmejerier from LIFE has been halted, and this is causing Norrmejerier financial problems.

Would the Commission consider reviewing the decision to withdraw support for Norrmejerier, thereby giving it the opportunity to complete the project according to plan?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(25 March 2004)

The LIFE Programme (1) aims at contributing to the implementation, updating and development of Community environment policy and of environmental legislation, in particular as regards the integration of the environment into other policies, and to sustainable development in the Community.

LIFE beneficiaries commit themselves to fulfil the requirements laid down in the individual Commission decision for their project and notably the standard administrative provisions (cf. LIFE web-site (2)).

The project LIFE00 ENV/S/854 proposed by the beneficiary Norrmejerier aims at building a pilot plant to ensure protein recycling and energy recovery in dairy production. Considering its potential positive environmental benefits, the project proposal was selected in 2000. In order to meet the beneficiary's need for more time for project implementation, a prolongation was exceptionally granted for 12 months, adding to the original timetable of three years.

Recently, the Commission received a new prolongation request, but decided to terminate the project. The Commission has carefully examined the Honourable Member's request to review this decision, but cannot do so and still be in conformity with the standard administrative provisions applying equally to all LIFE projects. The beneficiary has not been able to meet the extended deadlines and will not be able to achieve the original project conditions, thereby jeopardising project results. The project has barely started and only a small part of eligible costs have been incurred so far.

----

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1655/2000 of the Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 concerning the Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE), OJ L 192, 28.7.2000.

(2)  http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/environment/life/home.htm

----
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

        We have issued our report dated January 10, 1996 accompanying the
consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of RF Power
Products, Inc. and Subsidiary on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 1995.
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statements of RF Power Products, Inc. and Subsidiary on Forms S-8
(File No. 33-59414, effective March 12, 1993, File No. 33-73922, effective
January 7, 1994, and File No. 333-34563, effective August 28, 1997).


                                     Grant Thornton LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 24, 1998
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



The Board of Directors
American Dental Partners, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.:
333-50605, 333-59075, 333-59077 and 333-59079) on Form S-8 of our report dated
February 12, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of American
Dental Partners, Inc., as of December 31, 1997 and 1998, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, which report
appears in the December 31, 1998 Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Dental
Partners, Inc.



                                                /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 5, 1999
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 24, 2009 

p0217 

Order 

 

February 24, 2009 

137209 & (20)(21) 

 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137209 

 COA: 285455 

Genesee CC: 00-006041-FC 

JODY LYNN WELLS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 25, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion to remand for DNA testing and the motion for appointment of counsel are 

DENIED.
##### 



Key Employee Retention Agreement
   Severance Payment and Employee Benefits.
 Severance Payment.




---



##### 



[insert the following paragraph if the agreement is a new agreement and the participant
has not previously been a party to a KERA]
 [insert the following paragraphas paragraph (b) if the agreement is an amendment to an
existing agreement or the participant has previously been a party to a KERA in a different
classification]




---



##### 



Employee Benefits.




---



##### 



Certain Payment Reductions




---



##### 



Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options and Restricted Stock.
 Partial Acceleration.
 Full Acceleration




---



##### 



No Mitigation.
 Employment Rights.
 Definitions.
 Annual Base Pay
 Annual Incentive Pay
 Cause




---



##### 



Change in Control




---



##### 



Competitive Activity
 Deferred Commencement Date
 Demotion




---



##### 



Employee Benefits
 Emulex Option
 Normal Retirement Date
 Restricted Stock
 Withholding of Taxes.
 Notice.




---



##### 



Successors.
 Severability; Entire Agreement; Amendments.
 Governing Law.
 Counterparts.
 Board Approval
 Dispute Resolution




---



##### 



Late Payment Interest
 Very truly yours,
EMULEX [name] CORPORATION,
a [California or Delaware] corporationBy:James M. McCluney, CEO and President EMULEX CORPORATION,
a Delaware corporationBy:James M. McCluney, CEO and President
# CE2004084EN.01017201.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/172 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/172

---

(2004/C 84 E/0211)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0192/04

by Philip Bradbourn (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(22 January 2004)

Subject:   Repayments under n+2 rule

Subject:

Will the European Commission please supply its best estimate of what the United Kingdom, under the n+2 rule, will have to pay back by region for the financial year 2003?

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(1 March 2004)

(1 March 2004)

The application of Article 31(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds (1) requires that the Commission shall automatically decommit any part of a commitment which has not been settled by the payment on account or for which it has not received an acceptable payment application by the end of the second year following the year of commitment. There are certain exceptions in the case of judicial procedure and administrative appeals.

1

At the present time, the Commision has not completed the processing of payment declarations relating to 2001 and it is not therefore in a position to provide the information requested by the Honourable Member at this stage. The Commission has undertaken to inform the Member States by end-February 2004 on any possible automatic decommitments resulting from the application of the ‘n+2’ rule for the period ending on 31 December 2003.

---

(1)  OJ L 161, 26.6.1999.

1

---
cogo_8k-ex1001.htm


    Exhibit 10.1

     

    

     

    
      


       

      Date: 10
October 2008 

       

      Comtech Group,
Inc.

       

      Dear
Sirs,

       

      Re: 
General Banking Facilities

      Borrower(s)
: 1) Comtech International (Hong Kong) Limited

      2) Comtech
Broadband Corporation Limited

      3) Keen
Awards Limited

      4) Hong Kong JJT
Limited

        
          

        

      

       

      We are
pleased to confirm that the following facilities were made available to the
above Borrowers as at 10 October 2008:

       

      
        (I)       Facilities
utilized by all of the Borrowers provided that the aggregate Facilities utilized
by any one or all of the companies at any time should not exceed the following
limit:

      

       

      
        	
                Trade
      Facilities

              	
                USD10,000,000.00

              
	
                Overdraft

              	
                USD1,000,000.00

              
	
                Total

              	
                USD11,000,000.00

              


      

      


       

      (II)     
Facilities utilized by Borrower 1, Borrower 2 and Borrower 3 provided that the
aggregate
Facilities utilized by any one or all of the companies at any time should not
exceed the following limit:

       

      
         

        
          	
                  Trade
      Facilities

                	
                  USD30,000,000.00

                
	
                  Total

                	
                  USD30,000,000.00

                


        

        
 

      

      The facts
above are given as at 10 October 2008 without any responsibility or liability
whatsoever on the part of the Bank or its officials for or in respect of any of
such facts or any defect in or omission from such facts.

       

      Yours
faithfully,

      For
Bank of China (Hong Kong) Limited

       

      


      /s/ Yu San Bing Cindy

        
          

        

      

      Authorized
Signature(s)Yu San Bing
Cindy