11160 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Notices 

1See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 

Strip From India: Preliminary Results and Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 50620 (August 25, 2014) 

(Preliminary Results). 

2See Department letter to Jindal, ‘‘2012–2013 

Administrative Review of Polyethylene 

Terephthalate (PET) Film Sheet and Strip from 

India, Second Supplemental Questionnaire,’’ dated 

September 5, 2014. 

3See Letter from Jindal Poly Films Ltd., 

‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip 

from India/Antidumping Duty/Jindal Poly Films 

Ltd./Response to Second Supplemental 

Questionnaire,’’ dated September 12, 2014. 

4See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Operations, ‘‘Polyethylene 

Terphthalate Film, Sheet and Strip from India: 

Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review—2012– 

2013’’ (November 18, 2014). 

5On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and 

Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic 

Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to ACCESS. The 

Web site location was changed from http:// 

iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The 

Final Rule changing the references to the 

Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 

(November 20, 2014). 

6See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 

Strip From India: Preliminary Results and Partial 

Recission of Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reivew; 2012, 79 FR 50616, 50617 (August 25, 

2014). 

7See Memoranda to Thomas Gilgunn, Program 

Manager ‘‘Analysis Memorandum for the Final 

Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review of Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, 

and Strip from India: Jindal Poly Films Limited, 

and ‘‘Analysis Memorandum for the Final Results 

of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip 

from India: SRF Limited,’’ both dated concurrently 

with these final results. 

8See 19 CFR 351.212(b). 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–824] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet, and Strip From India: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) published its 

preliminary results of the administrative 

review of the antidumping duty (AD) 

order on polyethylene terephthalate 

film, sheet, and strip (PET Film) from 

India on August 25, 2014.1 The period 

of review is July 1, 2012, through June 

30, 2013. This review covers 

respondents Jindal Poly Films Limited 

(Jindal) and SRF Limited (SRF). For the 

final results, we continue to find that 

Jindal did, and that SRF did not, make 

sales of subject merchandise at less than 

normal value. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 2, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Myrna Lobo, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–2371. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 25, 2014, the Department 

published the Preliminary Results. We 

invited interested parties to comment on 

the Preliminary Results. Jindal 

submitted a case brief on October 1, 

2014. SRF submitted a letter in lieu of 

a case brief on the same day, stating that 

it agrees with the Preliminary Results. 

On September 5, 2014, the 

Department issued a supplemental 

questionnaire to Jindal,2 and received a 

response from Jindal on September 12, 

2014.3

On November 18, 2014, the 

Department extended the deadline for 

issuance of these final results from 

December 23, 2014 to February 23, 

2015.4

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the AD order 

are all gauges of raw, pretreated, or 

primed PET Film, whether extruded or 

coextruded. Excluded are metallized 

films and other finished films that have 

had at least one of their surfaces 

modified by the application of a 

performance-enhancing resinous or 

inorganic layer of more than 0.00001 

inches thick. Imports of PET Film are 

currently classifiable in the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) under item number 

3920.62.00.90. HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes. The written description of the 

scope of the antidumping duty order is 

dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case brief are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of issues raised 

and to which we respond in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is attached 

to this notice as an Appendix. The 

Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS).5

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://iaaccess.trade.gov, and is 

available to all parties in the Central 

Records Unit, room 7046 of the main 

Department of Commerce building. In 

addition, a complete version of the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum can 

be accessed directly on the Internet at 

http://trade.gov/enforcement/. The 

signed Issues and Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

versions of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, we have made no changes to 

SRF’s or Jindal’s calculations. However, 

both SRF’s and Jindal’s final rate in the 

companion countervailing duty 

administrative review has changed since 

the preliminary results of that review.6

Since the changes in the countervailing 

duty rates are partially attributable to 

changes in their export subsidies, we 

have adjusted SRF’s and Jindal’s 

reported U.S. prices and, accordingly, 

recalculated the weighted-average 

dumping margins for Jindal and SRF for 

these final results.7

Final Results of Review 

As a result of our review, we 

determine the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the 

period July 1, 2012, through June 30, 

2013. 

Producer or exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Jindal Poly Films Limited ............ 1.89 

SRF Limited ................................ 0.00 

Assessment Rates 

The Department determines, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. We will instruct 

CBP to liquidate entries of merchandise 

produced and/or exported by Jindal and 

SRF. The Department will issue 

assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 

after the date of publication of the final 

results of review. Where a respondent’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 

percent), the Department will calculate 

importer-specific assessment rates. 

Where the respondent reported the 

entered value for its sales, we calculated 

importer-specific ad valorem 

assessment rates based on the ratio of 

the total amount of dumping calculated 

for the examined sales to the total 

entered value of those same sales.8

However, where the respondent did not 

report the entered value for its sales, we 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Notices 11161 

9See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1). 

will calculate importer-specific per-unit 

duty assessment rates. We will instruct 

CBP to assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review where the actual or estimated ad 

valorem assessment rate calculated in 

the final results of this review is not 

zero or de minimis. Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate without regard to antidumping 

duties any entries for which the 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis.9

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective for all shipments of 

PET Film from India entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided for 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for the company 

under review will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of this 

review (except, if the rate is de minimis, 

i.e., less than 0.5 percent, then the cash 

deposit rate will be zero); (2) for 

previously reviewed or investigated 

companies not listed above, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published in the 

completed segment for the most recent 

period for that company; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the less-thanfair-value investigation, but the 

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established in the 

completed segment for the most recent 

period for the manufacturer of the 

merchandise; and (4) if neither the 

exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm 

covered in this or any other completed 

segment of this proceeding, then the 

cash deposit rate will be the all others 

rate for this proceeding, 5.71 percent. 

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Notifications to Interested Parties 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

The Department is issuing and 

publishing these final results of 

administrative review in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act. 

Dated: February 22, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

Scope of the Order 

III. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Quantity Discount Adjustment 

Comment 2: Consideration of an 

Alternative Comparison Method in 

Administrative Reviews 

Comment 3: Differential Pricing Analysis 

[FR Doc. 2015–04273 Filed 2–27–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity To Request 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD 

Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 

482–4735. 

Background 

Each year during the anniversary 

month of the publication of an 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

order, finding, or suspended 

investigation, an interested party, as 

defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), 

may request, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213, that the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) conduct 

an administrative review of that 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

order, finding, or suspended 

investigation. 

All deadlines for the submission of 

comments or actions by the Department 

discussed below refer to the number of 

calendar days from the applicable 

starting date. 

Respondent Selection 

In the event the Department limits the 

number of respondents for individual 

examination for administrative reviews 

initiated pursuant to requests made for 

the orders identified below, the 

Department intends to select 

respondents based on U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S. 

imports during the period of review. We 

intend to release the CBP data under 

Administrative Protective Order 

(‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO 

within five days of publication of the 

initiation notice and to make our 

decision regarding respondent selection 

within 21 days of publication of the 

initiation Federal Register notice. 

Therefore, we encourage all parties 

interested in commenting on respondent 

selection to submit their APO 

applications on the date of publication 

of the initiation notice, or as soon 

thereafter as possible. The Department 

invites comments regarding the CBP 

data and respondent selection within 

five days of placement of the CBP data 

on the record of the review. 

In the event the Department decides 

it is necessary to limit individual 

examination of respondents and 

conduct respondent selection under 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: 

In general, the Department finds that 

determinations concerning whether 

particular companies should be 

‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single 

entity for purposes of calculating 

antidumping duty rates) require a 

substantial amount of detailed 

information and analysis, which often 

require follow-up questions and 

analysis. Accordingly, the Department 

will not conduct collapsing analyses at 

the respondent selection phase of this 

review and will not collapse companies 

at the respondent selection phase unless 

there has been a determination to 

collapse certain companies in a 

previous segment of this antidumping 

proceeding (i.e., investigation, 

administrative review, new shipper 

review or changed circumstances 

review). For any company subject to this 

review, if the Department determined, 

or continued to treat, that company as 

collapsed with others, the Department 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES