alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.2






Exhibit 10.2





Caribou Coffee Company, Inc.


3900 Lakebreeze Avenue N.


Minneapolis, MN 55446




October 29, 2008




Daniel J. Hurdle

91 Shy Bear Way NW

Issaquah, WA 98027




Dear Mr. Hurdle:




     This letter agreement sets forth your agreement to invest in shares of Caribou Coffee Company,
Inc. (“Caribou”), common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”). You
hereby agree to purchase (in the open market) shares of Common Stock with an aggregate purchase
price of at least $25,000 with such purchase(s) to be made at the market price no later than the
end of the first trading window of at least ten (10) days occurring in calendar year 2009, subject
to approval by Caribou’s general counsel applying standard Caribou policies and procedures. As soon
as practical after you have completed your purchase of the required amount of Common Stock, Caribou
will grant you shares of restricted stock under Caribou’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan in an amount
equal to the same number of shares of Common Stock that you purchase during these window trading
periods, up to a maximum of 25,000 shares of restricted stock. This restricted stock shall be
subject to a four year (25% per year) vesting schedule and such other terms and conditions as set
forth by Caribou in the restricted stock certificate. In addition, on each vesting date for this
restricted stock you will certify to Caribou in writing that you own a number of shares of Common
Stock acquired by you in open market purchases that is at least equal to the number of shares in
the restricted stock grant described in this letter. Any failure to make such certification or to
own the required number of shares of Common Stock will subject you to forfeiture of the restricted
stock as further described in the restricted stock certificate.



     If this letter agreement correctly reflects the terms agreed by you and Caribou, please sign a
copy of this letter agreement in the space provided below and return it to my attention at the
address above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Yours sincerely,





CARIBOU COFFEE COMPANY, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Michael Tattersfield 	 
	 	 	Title:  	President & Chief Executive Officer 	 
	 



Agreed and acknowledged as of

the date first written above:




	 
	 

	Daniel J. Hurdle
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2496
LOYLESS B. TUCKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, and REGINALD A. LEE, SR.; WILLIAM E. REID, JR., Plaintiffs, versus JOHN B. DALTON, Secretary; DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Defendants - Appellees, versus JAMES L. CRAWFORD, Movant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-96-113-2-18AJ) Submitted: December 26, 1996 Decided: January 21, 1997 Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.2 Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Loyless B. Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. John Harris Douglas, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion for appointment of his choice of representative. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We note that our dismissal renders moot Appellant's motion to expedite this appeal.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

# Cryptologic Machines Image Gallery

HomeHistoryNational Cryptologic MuseumExhibits & ArtifactsCryptologic MuseumMachines

Search

Search

                              - All Images 
                              - Design Elements 
                              - NSA Historical Photographs 
                              - Other 

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (0.96 MB)

Tags:machines

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Exhibit 11

                         AUTOINFO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        Calculation of Earnings Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            Six Months Ended           Three Months Ended
                                          June 30,       May 31,      June 30,     May 31,
                                            1996          1995          1996        1995
                                        -----------------------------------------------------
<S>                                     <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>         
Primarily and fully diluted
earnings (loss):
Earnings (loss) from operations
applicable to common stock
     From continuing operations         $  (537,502)  $(1,938,461)  $  (939,051)  $(1,914,046)
     From discontinued operations              --       9,480,160          --       9,105,285
                                        -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
     Net income                         $  (537,502)  $ 7,541,699   $  (939,051)  $ 7,191,239
                                        -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------

Shares:
     Weighted average number of
     common shares outstanding            7,885,487     7,360,169      7,87,088     7,465,052
     Add shares issuable from assumed
     exercise of options and warrants          --         100,027          --         106,760
                                        -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
     Weighted average number of common
     shares as adjusted                   7,885,487     7,460,196     7,987,088     7,571,812
                                        -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------

Primary and fully diluted earnings
     per common share:
     From continuing operations         $      (.07)  $      (.26)  $      (.12)  $      (.26)
     From discontinued operations              --            1.28          --            1.23
                                        -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
     Net income                         $      (.07)  $      1.02   $      (.12)  $       .97
                                        -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
</TABLE>


                                       14
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Doc ID: 6715182
Exhibit 23.5





Consent of Des Cullen





I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of North American Palladium Ltd., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of references to my name and references to my involvement in the preparation of technical information relating to the Shebandowan West Property, Ontario, included in the 2010 Annual Information Form of North American Palladium Ltd., dated March 31, 2011 (the “AIF”).





I also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-13766) and in the Registration Statements on Form F-10 and amendments thereto (File Nos. 333-158082 and 333-164512) of the references to my name and the above-mentioned information in the AIF.





Dated this 31st day of March, 2011.





Name:
/s/ Des CullenDes Cullen
Exhibit 32A





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of AutoInfo, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Harry Wachtel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.




Date:       May 11, 2011




/s/ Harry Wachtel


Harry Wachtel


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Freckmann, Respondent, vs. Supreme Council of the Royal Arcanum, Appellant.

*April 7*

April *30, 1897.*

*Mutual benefit societies: Failure to pay assessment: Suspension of member*ipso facto.

Under by-law of a mutual benefit society providing that any member failing to pay an assessment within thirty days after notice thereof “ shall stand suspended from the order and all benefits therefrom,” a failure to pay within such time operates *ipso facto.*to suspend the delinquent without any action on the part of the society.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Milwaukee county: E. N. Austin, Judge.

*Reversed.*

On the 11th of August, 1892, John Henry Freckmann joined a subordinate council of the Eoyal Arcanum, and received a benefit certificate for the sum of $1,500, payable in case of his death to his wife (plaintiff here), provided *“*that said member is in good standing in this order at the time of his death.” One of the by-laws of the defendant, which became a part of the contract, is as follows:

“ Sec. 473. Each member shall pay the amount due on the notice of the collector within thirty days from the date of such notice, and any member failing to pay such assessment within said thirty days *shall stand suspended from, the order and all benefits therefromP*

*.*On the 1st of November, 1893, an assessment was levied-on the members of the order, and due notice was given to Freckmann to pay it. He did not pay it at any time. Freck-mann became treasurer of his council in February, 1893, and in November, 1893, was tried before a committee of the council upon charge of defalcation, and on the 28th of said month was found guilty, and expelled from the order. On the 8th day of December, 1893, Freckmann died. A verdict for the plaintiff for the full amount of the benefit certificate *134and interest was directed, and from judgment thereon the defendant appealed.

*JElihu Colman,*for the appellant.

*M. Lf. Lando,*for the respondent.

Winslow, J.

It is claimed that the trial and expulsion of Freckmann were irregular, and hence void. We need not consider this question, because upon another ground it is plain that the plaintiff cannot recover. The certificate was only payable in case Freckmann was a member of the order in good standing at the time of his death. The by-law which provided for suspension from the order in case of nonpayment of an assessment was plainly self-executing. In case an assessment is not paid within thirty days from the date of the notice, the member *“stands*suspended” from the order. Flo action by the council was necessary; the suspension was complete at the expiration of the thirty days. Niblack, Ben. Soc. *&*Acc. Ins. (2d ed.), § 289; *Lyon v. Royal Society of Good Fellows,*153 Mass. 83. Hence Freckmann was not a member in good standing at the time of his death.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, and action remanded for a new trial.

Oassoday, O. J., took no part.
98-1157.

#### State v. Gillard.

Stark App. No. CA6701. Reported at 85 Ohio St.3d 363, 708 N.E.2d 708. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
- ~- ) J. • , 

··- ~/ <--' z,,1 ..... -~
Exhibit 10.7


 


AGREEMENT


 


This AGREEMENT is by and between David L.
Porges (the “Executive”) and Equitable Resources, Inc. (“Equitable” or the
“Company”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are
parties to an Employment Agreement dated as of July 1, 1998, as amended on
December 1, 1999, September 1, 2002 and January 31, 2004 (as
amended, the “Employment Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the parties desire to terminate the
Employment Agreement as of the date set forth below and continue the employment
relationship indefinitely as an “at will” relationship; and


 


WHEREAS, the parties also intend to execute
simultaneously a new Change of Control Agreement and a new Confidentiality,
Non-Solicitation and Non-Competition Agreement (the “Non-Competition Agreement”);


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
mutual covenants herein contained and intending to be legally bound hereby, the
Company and Executive understand and agree as follows:


 


1.             The Employment Agreement shall be
terminated effective as of September 8, 2008 and shall thereafter be null
and void and of no further force and effect.


 


2.             Upon the termination of the
Employment Agreement, Executive and the Company agree to continue their
employment relationship indefinitely as an employment “at will” relationship subject,
however, to the mutual promises and covenants contained in the Change of Control
Agreement dated September 8, 2008 and the Non-Competition Agreement dated September 8,
2008.  Executive further agrees and
acknowledges that such continued employment shall not be deemed pursuant to any
term or provision of the Employment Agreement.


 


 













 


3.             It is understood and agreed that
this Agreement constitutes mutual written notice under numbered paragraph 2 of
the Employment Agreement that the parties no longer wish to extend the term of
the Employment Agreement and instead intend to terminate the Employment Agreement
effective September 8, 2008.


 


4.             This Agreement shall be governed by
and construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused
this Agreement to be executed on the dates set forth below.


 


 


	
  EQUITABLE
  RESOURCES, INC.

  	
   

  	
  /s/David L.
  Porges

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  David L.
  Porges

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/Charlene
  Petrelli

  	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
  September 19,
  2008

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Title:

  	
  Vice
  President & Chief HR Officer

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  September 23,
  2008

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Date

  	
   

  	
   

  
						



 


 


- 2 -
Exhibit 10.17



 Exhibit 10.17 
 AMENDMENT No. 2 TO 
 OCEAN CITY HOME BANK 
 SPLIT DOLLAR LIFE INSURANCE AGREEMENT 
 This amendment hereby supplements and amends the Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement dated as of
December 18th, 2002 and Amendment No. 1 to the Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement dated as of May 10, 2007. Effective as of
October 22, 2008, the Exhibit A of said Agreement shall be amended as follows: 
 Hereafter, all references to policy, policies, and insurer shall mean:

  

			
	 Policy No. (“Policy” or “Policies”)
	 	 Insurer (“Insurers”)

	 6095122
	 	Mass Mutual
	 17767034
	 	Northwestern Mutual
	 56311191
	 	New York Life
	 56312140
	 	New York Life

 All other terms and conditions of the Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement shall continue in full force and
effect. 
 Signed at Ocean City, New Jersey, this 22nd day of October, 2008. 
  

			
	Ocean City Home Bank
		
	By:	 	/s/ Kim M. Davidson
		
	Its:	 	Executive Vice President and Corporate Secretary

 Acceptance 
 The insured accepts and agrees to the foregoing amendment. 

	
	
	/s/ Steven E. Brady
	Steven Brady








 Effective October 22, 2008, Exhibit B to the Ocean City Home Bank Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement with Steven
Brady was amended in its entirety to read as follows: 
 Exhibit B 
 Ocean City Home Bank – Steve Brady 
  

			
	 Age
	 	 Pre/Post Termination
 Death Benefit 1, 2, 3, 4

	 55
	 	$2,868,800
	 56
	 	$2,868,800
	 57
	 	$2,868,800
	 58
	 	$2,868,800
	 59
	 	$2,868,800
	 60
	 	$2,868,800
	 61
	 	$2,868,800
	 62
	 	$2,868,800
	 63
	 	$2,743,234
	 64
	 	$2,658,958
	 65
	 	$2,569,625
	 66
	 	$2,474,932
	 67
	 	$2,374,558
	 68
	 	$2,268,161
	 69
	 	$2,155,380
	 70
	 	$2,035,833
	 71
	 	$1,909,112
	 72
	 	$1,774,789
	 73
	 	$1,632,406
	 74
	 	$1,481,480
	 75
	 	$1,321,498
	 76
	 	$1,151,918
	 77
	 	$   972,162
	 78
	 	$   781,622
	 79
	 	$   579,649
	 80
	 	$   365,557
	 81
	 	$   138,620
	 82
	 	—

  

	1	In the event of termination of employment prior to age 60 following a Change in Control, the Executive’s benefit shall be determined under this schedule by assuming that the
Executive’s age at termination was 60. 


	2	In the event of termination by reason of Disability, this schedule shall be followed based on the Executive’s actual age of termination. 


	3	In the event of termination prior to age 60, other than by reason of Disability or following a Change in Control, the Executive acknowledges and agrees that his scheduled benefit
above shall be reduced proportionately at termination by reference to the vested percentage of his benefit on the date of termination under his Salary Continuation Agreement with the Bank of even date herewith and by assuming that the
Executive’s age at termination was 60. 


	4	In the event of termination after age 60, this schedule shall be followed by assuming that the Executive’s age at termination was 60.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 34 (Friday, February 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 9282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03547]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

NOTICE:  Cancellation.

DATE AND TIME:  The Legal Services Corporation's Board of Directors and 
Finance Committee meetings scheduled for February 19, 2015 at 4:00 
p.m., EDT, have been canceled. These meetings were noticed in the 
Friday, February 13, 2015 issue of the Federal Register, 80 FR 8110.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION:  Katherine Ward, Executive Assistant to 
the Vice President & General Counsel, at (202) 295-1500. Questions may 
be sent by electronic mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5a1c080514150e13191f050b0f1f090e131514091a362939743d352c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e6a0b4b9a8a9b2afa5a3b9b7b3a3b5b2afa9a8b5a68a9585c8818990">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: February 18, 2015.
Stefanie K. Davis,
Assistant General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015-03547 Filed 2-18-15; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NO. 07-02-0008-CV IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL D MARCH 18, 2002

______________________________ IN THE MATTER OFTHE MARRIAG E OF BRANDY S. CAVAZOS AN D ROLANDO CAVAZOS AND IN THE I NTEREST OF K.S.C .AND M.S.C , CHILDREN

_________________________________ FROM THE 110 th DISTRIC T COURT O F DICKENS CO UNTY; NO. 4172; HON. JOHN R. HOLLUMS, PRESIDING

_______________________________

DISMISSAL

_______________________________ Before BOYD, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS , JJ. Rolando Cavazos (Rolando) appellant , f iled his noti ce of appeal on Januar y 3, 2002. Accompanying the notice was neither a fil ing fee of $125.0 0 or proof of his status a s a pauper. Consequentl y, this C ourt issued a letter, dated Janu ary 7, 2002 i nforming Rolando of the defect and that the fail ure to cure s ame within ten days coul d result in the dismissal of

the appeal. So to o was he tol d of his need to file a docketing statem ent within the same time peri od. The court has not recei ved the fili ng fee mentioned above, proof enabling Rolando to cont inue his appeal as an indigent (as authori zed by t he Texas Rule s of Appellate Proced ure), or the docketing s tatement.2

Acco rdin gly, we dismi ss the appeal pur suantto Texas Rule of Appellate Proced ure 42.3 (c) due to appellant’s failure to pay the filing fee and pr

ovide a docketing statement as previo usly dir

ected by thi s Court.

Per Curiam Do not publish

.
EXHIBIT 23.4

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent  public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the  incorporation by
reference   of  our  report,   dated   April  29,  1998  on  United   Pan-Europe
Communications  N.V. for the years ended  December 31, 1997 and 1996 included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K, into previously  filed  Registration  Statement
File Nos. 33-81876, 33-87326 and 333-00226.


                                       ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO.


Amstelveen, The Netherlands
May 25, 1998
99-93.

#### State v. Hanna.

Warren C.P. No. 98CR17677. On motion for complete copy of the prosecutor’s file to be sealed and filed for appellate review. Motion denied.