alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 39 (Friday, February 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 10745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03520]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Advisory Committee on Veterans Business Affairs: Federal Register 
Meeting Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice of open Federal Advisory Committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The full committee meeting will focus on business 
opportunities for veterans and service disabled veterans. Several 
topics include government procurement and business development. The 
meeting is open to the public.

DATES: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20416, Eisenhower Conference Room C, located on the 
Concourse Level Floor.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), SBA announces the 
meeting of the Advisory Committee on Veterans Business Affairs. The 
Advisory Committee on Veterans Business Affairs serves as an 
independent source of advice and policy recommendation to the 
Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration. Advance notice 
of attendance or desire to make a presentation to the Advisory 
Committee is requested. Comments for the Record should be emailed to 
point of contact listed below prior to the meeting for inclusion in the 
public record. Verbal presentations will be limited to five minutes in 
order to meet the agenda objectives. Requests for attendance/briefing 
must be emailed or sent via post by March 4, 2015 to: Ms. Barbara 
Carson, Acting Associate Administrator, Office of Veterans Business 
Development, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20416; phone: (202) 205-6773; email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e183809383809380cf828093928e8fa1928380cf868e97"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1674776474776477387577646579785665747738717960">[email protected]</span></a>. Public comments, requests for additional 
information and/or special accommodations should be directed to same 
contact above. For more information, please visit our Web site at 
www.sba.gov/vets.

    Dated: February 6, 2015.
Diana Doukas,
SBA Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-03520 Filed 2-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

     The following are the Company's subsidiaries at December 31, 1998:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Name                                    Jurisdiction of Organization
----                                    ----------------------------
<S>                                     <C>

NBase Communications, Inc.              Maryland
NBase Communications, Ltd               Israel
NBase Europe GmbH                       Germany
NBase Fibronics Ltd                     Israel
Netsoft Solutions Ltd                   France
Turnkey                                 Switzerland
Kempton Communications                  United Kingdom
NBase Xyplex, Inc.                      Delaware
Xyplex, Inc.                            Massachusetts
EDSLAN SRL                              Italy
RDS                                     Sweeden

</TABLE>
Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1 Filed12/21/12 Page1 of 1
Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page1 of 13
Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page2 of 13
Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page3 of 13
Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page4 of 13
Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page5 of 13
Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page6 of 13
Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page7 of 13
Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page8 of 13
Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page9 of 13
Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page10 of 13
Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page11 of 13
Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page12 of 13
Case3:12-cv-06472-EDL Document1-1 Filed12/21/12 Page13 of 13
```

[Federal Register: June 17, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 116)]
[Notices]               
[Page 34438]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17jn10-55]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, June 23, 2010; 10 a.m.-12 Noon.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the Public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Compliance Status Report

    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: June 14, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-14816 Filed 6-15-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
#### Esau, Respondent, vs. Greene & Button Company, Appellant.

*September 3*

September *22, 1896.*

*Promissory notes: Transfer without indorsement: Delivery with option to return.*

A debtor, -who held notes of a third person payable to his order, delivered them to his creditor, who agreed that if, upon inquiry, he found the notes to be good he would apply the amount thereof on the indebtedness, but otherwise would return them. Afterwards, on demand of the debtor, the creditor refused to return the notes. *Held,*that such refusal was an exercise of the creditor’s option to retain the notes, and vested the title in him, even though they had not been indorsed by the debtor.

Appeal from an order of the superior court of Milwaukee county: J. 0. Ludwig, Judge.

*Reversed.*

One Arthur E. Stein was indebted to the defendant in the sum of $700. He held notes against one Edward W. Yogel to the amount of $675. He offered these notes to the defendant, to be applied upon his indebtedness to it. The defendant received the notes with the agreement that it should make inquiry, and, if it became satisfied that the notes were good and the maker solvent, it would apply the amount to the payment of Stein’s indebtedness; otherwise it would return the notes to Stein. Afterwards Stein demanded the return of the notes to him, which was denied. The notes were not indorsed by Stein, and the defendant did not desire their indorsement. Stein then assigned the notes to the plaintiff. Plaintiff gave notice to the defendant of the assignment, and demanded delivery of the notes to him, which was refused. He then brought this action for the conversion of the notes. To the complaint, setting up, in substance, these facts, the defendant demurred on the ground that it does not state a cause of action. From an order overruling the demurrer this appeal is taken.

*9For the appellant there was a brief by Turner, *Bloodgood &*Kemper, attorneys, and *Jaokson B.*Kemper, of counsel,, and oral argument by *Jackson B. Kemper.*

*Christian*Doerfler, for the respondent.

Newman, J.

No doubt, under the agreement, it was in the defendant’s option to retain the notes and apply them on Stein’s debt. Its refusal to return them on demand was. an exercise of that option, which was conclusive upon it. Under the agreement upon which the notes had been delivered to it by Stein, it operated to vest the title to the notes-in it, and, of course, to defeat Stein’s title. It is unimportant that Stein did not indorse the notes. Title would pass-without it, and, being for the defendant’s benefit, it might waive it. Of course, under these circumstances, Stein could give to the plaintiff no better title to the notes than he himself had. The demurrer should have been sustained.

*By the*Court.— The order of the superior court of Milwaukee county is reversed, and the cause remanded with, direction to enter an order sustaining the demurrer.
# CE2004084EN.01065101.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/651 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/651

---

(2004/C 84 E/0733)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0671/04

by Proinsias De Rossa (PSE) to the Commission

(9 March 2004)

Subject:   Ireland's failure to report on CO2 emissions from new passenger cars

Subject:

2

What reply, if any, has the Commission received from the Irish Government in response to the reasoned opinion sent to Ireland in April 2002, as announced in IP/02/553, regarding Ireland's failure to report on CO2 emissions from new passenger cars in line with Decision No 1753/2000/EC (1) of 22 June 2000? What action has the Commission taken or is it considering taking in this matter?

2

1

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(16 April 2004)

(16 April 2004)

The infringement procedure referred to by the Honourable Member (2) relates to the failure by Ireland to provide monitoring data on Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from new passenger cars for the year 2000 pursuant to Decision No 1753/2000/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 2000 establishing a scheme to monitor the average specific emissions of CO2 from new passenger cars. As Ireland's response to this infringement did not provide the missing information, the Commission decided to refer Ireland to the Court of Justice and a Court application was lodged in June 2003. During the course of the Court proceedings, Ireland provided data for 2000 and 2001. The Commission considered that the infringement had thereby been brought to an end and in December 2003 it decided to withdraw the proceedings from the Court.

2

2

2

---

(1)  OJ L 202, 10.8.2000, p. 1.

1

(2)  2001/2203.

2

---
REJ"l"\ GUI 

... ~~9 41 IL>L:i "'I Ir"\ .. 

iii'B'tH'lfPI' IHPORMA I iOFr 

USCIB: 5/456 

16 July 1953 

eoMPim:NTIAL - SEetJRiff MOfiMA:'fIGN 

MDIORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Change in Membership on USCIBEC. 

. . The Director of Naval Intelligence has ~formed the 

Executive Secretary that Captain W. M. McCormick, USN, has 

been appointed the Navy member of USCIBEC, vice Captain 

B. F. Roeder, USN. The effective date of this appointment 

is 11 July 19 53. 

Deputy Executive ~ Secreta:ry, USCIB 

USCIB: 5/456 

cot~FIDENTIAL 

24 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-09-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B
Bob Bevilacqua Town of Harrietstown

- Supervisor 39 Main Street Saranac Lake, NY 12983

Dear Supervisor Bevilacqua 

### Iam a resident of your neighbor, The Town of Santa Clara. That said, 

### Ihope you wilt consider my perspective on the air service to the airport that serves both towns and the surrounding area. Iam often out of town because, as the letterhead indicates, my work takes me to Syracuse much of the work week. However, ,am very much involved in the Saranac Lake community aswell asthe community of the Adirondack Park. Iam currently on the board of Paul Smith's College, The Adirondack North Country Association, and the Adirondack Bureau of the Wildlife Conservation Society. My wife ison the board of The Trudeau Institute. Not only do we spend a great deal of time involved with these organizations as board members, we come infrequent contact with others who travel to board meetings, some from great distances. We are also aware of at least some of the travels of staff, leadership and faculty. These are people who use the airport and would use it more with increased service. Many of these people donate their time and drive six or more hours to meetings. Some travel to conferences to present papers. others are "on the road" raising money. Iwrite to request that DOT,the town, the state all seek and support increased air service to the Harrietstown Airport. Boston service has been important. Ithas grown and prospered with Cape Air. 

### Itnow has a critical mass that makes ita viable and valuable service and, in my opinion Cope Air isdoing a great job. Three flights per day works and works well from Boston and Iwould not want to see that service reduced.
Ialso know that most of the people Iwork with and the board members for the boards I am on travel from or through the New York City metropolitan area. 

### Iam therefore writing to support the addition of service to New York City in the EASprogram that isso important to Saranac Lake, Tupper Lake and the region. Ido not write on behalf of any organization Iam on the board of. Iam the classic private citizen. Iam not a CEO ora COO or an Executive Director. However, Iknow how much my friends and follow volunteers could benefit by air service to NYC. Iknow that researchers and administrators at WCS, PSC,Trudeau, etc. all would be able to enhance their work, travel with more options and lessinconvenience. We could attract more entrepreneurs who need access to New York City.
Iwill not go on further but do want to add my appreciation for the service of Cape Air. It isn't often that a large business like Cape Air has the skillto support small improvements and smaller cities and towns. vty

James 

### L.Sonneborn BOUSQUETHOLSTEINPLLC
110West Foyette Street! One Lincoln Center, Suite 900 

### I Syracuse, New York 13202-1387 Tel:315.701,,6316 

## I Fax: 315.423.2804 

## I Email: JSonneborn@BHI AWl'LlCcorY} 

## I
# CE2004084EN.01036001.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/360 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/360

---

(2004/C 84 E/0418)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0324/04

by W.G. van Velzen (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(3 February 2004)

Subject:   New Belgian levy on Netherlands and German electricity distribution companies for use of the Belgian high-voltage grid when importing electricity from France

Subject:

According to an article published in the Financieel Dagblad of 20 January 2004, Belgium is imposing a new levy on Netherlands and German electricity distribution companies for use of the Belgian high-voltage grid when importing electricity from France.

| 1. | Is the Commission aware of this report, and is the substance of the Financieel Dagblad article correct? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the Commission aware of this report, and is the substance of the Financieel Dagblad article correct?

| 2. | Does the Commission consider that Belgium is permitted to impose a new levy for the use of the Belgian high-voltage grid by Netherlands and Germany? If so, on the basis of what article? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does the Commission consider that Belgium is permitted to impose a new levy for the use of the Belgian high-voltage grid by Netherlands and Germany? If so, on the basis of what article?

| 3. | If not, what action does the Commission intend to take? |
| --- | --- |

3.

If not, what action does the Commission intend to take?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(4 March 2004)

(4 March 2004)

Having looked into this matter, it would seem that the Belgian Federal Government does intend to impose specific charges on cross-border transits of electricity.

At this point in time, it is therefore merely an intention.

If this were to materialise, and the system operator was obliged to levy this type of charge, it goes without saying that the Commission would initiate the usual action to verify the compatibility of such a measure with the internal market and the inter-TSO (Transmission System Operator) compensation mechanism recently introduced which makes it possible for the first time to eliminate in the EU any charge on individual transactions and, as from 1 July 2004, with Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 of 26 June 2003 on conditions for access to the network for cross-border exchanges in electricity (1).

1

Pursuant to Article 4(5) of that regulation, ‘there shall be no specific network charge on individual transactions for declared transits of electricity’.

The Commission will keep an eye on this matter and will do everything in its power to prevent the establishment of national mechanisms which might adversely affect intra-Community trade.

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 15.7.2003.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      18,680,758
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,680,758
<PP&E>                                      21,947,468
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,628,226
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          294,874
<BONDS>                                      1,646,212
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  38,687,140
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,628,226
<SALES>                                      2,231,192
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,526,953
<CGS>                                          694,721
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  694,721
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               904,490
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                927,742
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            927,742
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   927,742
<EPS-BASIC>                                      11.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    11.17


</TABLE>
• REF ID:A72073 • 

J>ro!et&<>r o. ~. To.mpldu 

Kati on.al Bur ea'll of S iamd..a.J'da 

In••itut. tor lfuaetioal A.Da.lyl11 

Un!TeJ'litY of California 

405 Hilgari Aftrl\111 

to• ~les 24. o.tltfornia 

t l\l'I eMlodng t~ o'bJeo\• for et\her 70u or Dilvorlh or 

'beth to work oa. a• I tlO'M4 t voul.!. J ban ft\ Gft from •hi 

'\O]I & teserip\lon of vha\ \he7 aft but 1\ no\tld be f'A.irlt obT!O"lll to you. After all you oan ooUJtt. !he7 a.re mdea\el.1 

efl•1 to do bf band but MJ"giaal ea.IH i:tn a 11Ule harder \o 

ftnd aDd t 40»• \ think ,au n.nt '° •\an oft vi th tMia anybov. 

An •~:_,le of one vill follow some UJM ill the Nure. 

Mll1nc•l•1 it now p1"0&ft.llKlis:ig \he i'4ta \hilt Dilworth a'Gg'-

ce•ted.. :&. 1• plaJUdn.g U for \be U03 &n4 1 \ aolll.4 Mke u 

in\H'estin& •J:Ptlrlqn.\. t Yill keep 70u 1afDl'IM4 of \he rewult• bu\ 4oa•\ expff\ '9 ha.Ye all7' for ... •t• a• tbi1 l• 

!1llln&:11le7•1 ttrat procrae. 

l mea.it\ \o alk 70u 1fhether ve are eo-.how or o\her aanac1 nc to pay Dtlvorlh fop iii. tilll9 ~ ta p11.•ttDC in behe•n. 

SCAMP'•· t ~ and ...... ..,. bn\ \hit 1• Mrel1 a ranAoa 

queatton. 

t es&erl.7 avaU 70ur phonotraph reool'l't, bu• know you 

h&,.e Oiher pnbleml Oil JOU%' lllin4. 

V1th 'be•\ vi.WI tor a M•rf7 Obrlatau aD4 a Ha:PW New 

TMI' ~o yoi1 aa4. TOVI faail7. t &II 

'lnolt 2 

R. A., LltBLRR 

Chief 

M!l.thoa\leal Re9e.,,.rch l>1Tia1oa 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 02-18-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP,
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements: (1) on Form S-8
pertaining to the 1992 Stock Option Plan (Nos. 33-96458 and 333-87731), the Italian Employees
Warrant Program (No. 333-87743), the 1998 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan (No. 333-87739), the
1997 Incentive And Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan
(Nos. 333-87735, 333-47896 and 333-81956), the 2000 MRV
Communications, Inc. Stock Option Plan for Employees Of Optronics International Corp.
(No. 333-47898), the 2000 MRV Communications, Inc. Stock Option Plan For Employees of Astroterra
Corporation (No. 333-47900), the 2001 MRV
Communications, Inc. Stock Option Plan For Employees Of Appointech,
Inc. (No. 333-71180),
the MRV Communications, Inc. 2002 International Stock Option
Plan (No. 333-81954), the MRV Communications, Inc. 2002 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan For Employees Of
LuminentOIC, Inc. (No. 333-81958), the LuminentOIC Inc. Amended
And Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan
(No. 333-81950) and Non-Director and Non-Executive Officer Consolidated Long-Term Stock Incentive
Plan (No. 333-107109); (2) on Form S-3 filings No. 333-86163, 333-44534, 333-106169, and
333-106177; and (3) on Form S-4 filing No. 333-44536;
of MRV Communications, Inc. of our reports
dated February 25, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of MRV
Communications, Inc., MRV Communications, Inc. managements assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of MRV Communications, Inc. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2004. /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP Woodland Hills, California
March 7, 2005 93
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         MAY-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                          3,328
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  20,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                      527
<INVENTORY>                                    32,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               61,721
<PP&E>                                         61,693
<DEPRECIATION>                                 35,550
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                124,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          19,078
<BONDS>                                        26,708
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                     6,999
<COMMON>                                        1,347
<OTHER-SE>                                     70,372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  124,504
<SALES>                                        75,461
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               76,919
<CGS>                                          48,588
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  50,142
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               25,018
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,622
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   137
<INCOME-TAX>                                      129
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 8
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                        8
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.00
        


</TABLE>