alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
REF ID:A517376 

Mr.M£J~-

1~\ 

27 JUN 1951 \ IDAl/6 

AnA-123/kot \ 

uc I 00J229 

TOP SECRET EQ 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

PL~6-36/50 USC 3605 

/ 

··-

KEKOWIXM FOih THE us mg:.BGlfICll, us/t11 <XIO'llmfCE arl I J-/ ~IClll Bmlllltt L.....-----1 

Sub.jeot l I Cl"J'Ptogrepbic Seeurit7 ~ta. 

&\closure a Cow' 8pec1al Aaliat.ant, 1.ntell.i&mce, Dept. ot State, 

Top hont Kemo dat.ed 19 June 1951. 

l. The m.clolUl"e 1a toh&rded tor WormatJ.on. 

FOR THI VICD COORDDA'1'0!1 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 09-04-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

\ 

I 

\ 

I 

\ 

' ' 

' 
. . REF ID:A517376 

.. t .r, D r,, r r· if) r, ~f 

:i "'~""' r •. ; L t:: h. L 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

tASHINGTON 

~p3.3(h)(2) 

PN:S6-36/50 USC 3605 

19 June 1951 

JJEMORANDUi.i FOR TllE USCIB CooiIDilMTCR 

SUBJECT: ! ..... __ __,pryptogra:ihic Security Arrangements 

FOl':Warded .herewith are eight copies ot a TOP SECRET and Personal 

letter ciated. 2B May 19.51 tram Sir Robert .Mackenzie o.f the British For~ian Ottice to Hro G. A. C:n-ey Foster of the British ForeiOl oti'iceo 

conae secur y arrangeman s. s n e ~agraph e le.t er0 a copy '"as 8ivcn directly by the \il'iter tq....._ _____ __,I of .the Departmont of State. 

You w recall.. that Sir Robert. Mackenz e also attended several meet a 

ot the US/UK Conterence onr--1·.. Comm·.. unications Security which eunvened 

in Uaahington on l. May 195~ 

\ .1 l•·iaa the Depa~t cl State member of the US Group of 

the L ~ocurity torld.ne Group,, andl I wu his 

alternate. sir Philip\Viokocy WM Chairman o! the UK Group. 

In accordance with :recent decioion of USCIB that tho US Delegaticn 

to the t.5/U".i< Coof erence on Security should seJ"V9 

as an !!! h9s, conmittee to keep the prob om o 

aecurity under continuous review, it is reque·-=sr":".3"""":c~ar-:::a=--=c-=-0P.=-='Y=-::o"llll'"-:n:-::'a 

enclosed letter be i'on1arded to each Delegation almber for hi8 information and for the inf'o:mation of his IBCD3 pricipal. It is auce;ested. 

that a copy be fon1nrd.ed to the Cho.irrn.an o1' the USCID IntelUBence 

Cornmittee for use in c~:mection \7ith the surwy ~t foreign COT.aNT 

activU.iea which ie nO\"J boine undertaken ·'Y the COll'l.llittee.. l\n 

additional CQPY is provided tor the tiles of the USC!ll ~>ecretcriat.o 
. ,.. REF ID:A517376 

-

TOP SEC:RET 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

A copy hae been paseed ~ly to Mr. Keay of the FU!. 

Additionsl copiee I1JJJ3' bc:t f'<>n1b.rded to the USCID rrw.mbera ~1h~ are 

not represented tij.rectly on the Delegation~ it and when this 

P.Ppears negearsary as part of total. Uf-CIB conaidfl1"ation ot the 

L....------1~ c6.amunicatims securtt,y prcblan. 

FCR Tllli St>.c;CI1\L J\SSISTJUiT, INTELLIG.l!l'lCE: 

Enclosure 

S cys ot TS ltr dtd. 

2.8 Ma7195l 

/e/ Robert F • Pac:lrard 

/t/ ROBERT F. PACKi\RD
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 40 (Monday, March 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 11192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04239]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. NJ15-4-001]


Orlando Utilities Commission; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on February 19, 2015, the Orlando Utilities 
Commission submitted its tariff filing per 35.28(e): Amendment to its 
Order No. 1000 Regional Compliance Filings, to be effective 1/1/2015.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#31777463727e5f5d585f54624441415e434571575443521f565e47"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f3b5b6a1b0bc9d9f9a9d96a08683839c8187b395968190dd949c85">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on March 23, 2015.

    Dated: February 24, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-04239 Filed 2-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          18,098
<SECURITIES>                                     2,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,630
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,659
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,567
<PP&E>                                          88,721
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,857
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 158,126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,312
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           823
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   158,126
<SALES>                                          9,776
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,776
<CGS>                                            7,903
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,253
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 778
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (892)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (304)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (588)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (588)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
#### In re Report of the Commission on Continuing Legal Education. Robin Foley Miller (# 0061811), Respondent.

1999 TERM

ORDER

[Filed August 31, 1999]

This matter originated in this Court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “Commission”) pursuant to Gov. Bar R. X, Sec. 6, Div. (A) (1) (b) and Div. (A) (2) (d). The Commission recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys, including the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the provisions of Gov. Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal Education, for the 1996-1997 reporting period.

On March 16, 1999, pursuant to Gov. Bar R. X, Sec. 6, Div. (B) (3), this Court entered an order adopting the recommendation of the Commission, imposing a fee sanction upon the respondent.

On April 13, 1999, the Commission filed a motion to vacate, requesting that the order of March 16, 1999, pertaining to the respondent, be vacated. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the Court that the motion to vacate be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the Court that the order of March 16, 1999, pertaining to respondent, is hereby vacated and this cause is dismissed.
Exhibit24.3

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appointseach of Barry F. Schwartz, Robert K. Kretzman and Michael T. Sheehan orany of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-factand agent, with full power of substitution, for him and his name, placeand stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the REVLON,INC. (the ‘‘Corporation’’) Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December  31,  2005 (the‘‘Form 10-K’’) under the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limiting thegenerality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and onbehalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a directoror officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K andany instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or inconnection with the Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file thesame, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connectiontherewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities andExchange Commission and any applicable securities exchange orsecurities self-regulatory body, granting unto said attorneys-in-factand agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do andperform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be donein and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as hemight or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all thatsaid attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substituteor substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtuehereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed thesepresents this 1st day ofMarch, 2006.

|  | /s/ DONALD G.DRAPKIN                                 DONALDG. DRAPKIN |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
.. ' 

• 

USCIB: 13.2/34 

S!eftE'f 

REF ID:A65652 

SECRET 

MDiORANDtlM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

10 September 1954 

Subject: Clearance for Categoey III CCJUNT (WEBER) • 

1. The enclosure is forwarded at the request of the Director 

of Central Intelligence. 

2. Should there be objection to the action indicated in 

paragraph 3 of the enclosure, it is requested that this office be 

so notified prior to 1700, Thursday, 16 September 1954. 

Enclosure 

CIA Memo dtd 8 Sep 1954. 

USCIB: 13. 2/34 

24 

S"ECRET eclassified and approved for release by 

SA on 09-11-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352 
•• REF ID:A65652 

SECltET 

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Secretary, USCIB 

SUBJECT Clearance for Category III CCMINT. 

REFERENCE USCIB 13.2/25 

S SEP 1954 

1. This Agency has been advised by the Executive Secretary or 

the NSC that Mr. Ralph T. Walters, a member or the NSC Special 

Starr and Executive Secretary or the Net Capabilities Evaluation 

Subcomm:i.ttee, has resigned his position and that the request for 

his clearance for Category III COMINT is therefore cancelled. 

Security clearance of Mr. Walters had not been completed. by this 

Agency, and he was not, therefore, indoctrinated. 

2. Mr. LEcy" further advises that Mr. George Weber, also or the 

NSC Special Staff, has assumed the duties of Executive Secretary 

of the Subcommittee, and requests that he be cleared for access to 

Category III CWINT. 

3. In the absence of objection on the part of any member, this 

Agency will initiate investigative steps and indoctrinate M~. Weber, 

vice Mr. Walters, should no derogatory information be revealed, in 

accordance with the decision of USCIB at its 105th Meeting. 

FOR THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE: 

(Signed) 

for 

HUNTINGTON D. SHELDON 

CIA MEMBER, USCIB 

Enclosure with USCIB 13.2/34 dtd 10 Sep 1954. 

SECRET 

OGA
# CE2004084EN.01040201.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/402 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/402

---

(2004/C 84 E/0468)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0453/04

by Ilda Figueiredo (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(23 February 2004)

Subject:   Exploitation of Portuguese workers in France

Subject:

The French and Portuguese media have denounced the unacceptable exploitation, tantamount to full-blown slavery, of Portuguese workers in France, specifically in the Loire-Atlantique region. A complaint has of course already been launched against the IDG (International Deboning Group), which failed to fulfil its job contracts, pay salaries, transport, bonuses, holidays and so on to its Portuguese workers.

What measures have been taken or are going to be taken to protect the rights of Portuguese workers, and to ascertain the responsibility of French public organisations in maintaining these situations of full-blown slavery?

Answer given by Mr Dimas on behalf of the Commission

(1 April 2004)

(1 April 2004)

As the Commission has already pointed out in its answer to the Honourable Member's Written Question E-3834/03 (1), whether the cases in question come under Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community (2) or under Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (3) depends primarily on whether their employment in France is permanent. If so, French employment law is applied in full, and discrimination on grounds of nationality is not permitted. If not, the Portuguese workers concerned are covered by a ‘hard core’ of protective rules, set out in the above Directive, on the working and employment conditions in force in France, and the remainder of their working conditions are governed by the law of the country of origin.

1

2

3

Effective monitoring and surveillance of compliance with working and employment conditions are primarily the responsibility of the national authorities and courts, and any specific information which individuals, including the Honourable Member, may have on non-compliance with the relevant working conditions should be submitted to these authorities.

The Commission does not have any reason to doubt that the supervisory measures and sanctions provided for by the legislation of the Member State to which the Honourable Member refers are generally effective and proportionate and act as a deterrent. Nor does it possess any information to suggest that the French authorities are any less diligent in addressing infringements of the obligations arising from Community law than in applying the corresponding purely national legislation.

---

(1)  OJ C 78 E, 27.3.2004.

1

(2)  OJ L 257, 19.10.1968.

2

(3)  OJ L 18, 21.1.1997.

3

---
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Christina W. Hagan, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dawson Geophysical Company;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.                    Dated: February 14, 2005 /s/ Christina W. Hagan   Christina W. Hagan   Executive Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-50184

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jacob Ray Owens, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:19-CR-44-2

Before King, Smith, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Jacob Owens appeals his sentence for conspiracy to possess with 

intent to distribute fifty grams or more of methamphetamine. See 21 U.S.C. 

§§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), 846. As Owens acknowledges, his as-applied Sixth 

Amendment sentencing challenge is foreclosed by circuit precedent. See 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances 

set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 17, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 20-50184 Document: 00515529043 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/17/2020
No. 20-50184

2

United States v. Hernandez, 633 F.3d 370, 374 (5th Cir. 2011); Groendyke 

Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). Accordingly, his 

motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment is 

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 20-50184 Document: 00515529043 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/17/2020
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00313

- CV

In the INTEREST OF M.H.

, a Child

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009

- CI

- 15779

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

We ORDER appellant, Linda Fuentes, bear all costs of this appeal.

SIGNED June 18, 2014.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1698 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1698

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
           the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen

                                 An Act

 
   To exclude payments from State eugenics compensation programs from 
consideration in determining eligibility for, or the amount of, Federal 
                            public benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Treatment of Certain Payments in 
Eugenics Compensation Act''.
SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF PAYMENTS FROM STATE EUGENICS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS 
FROM CONSIDERATION IN DETERMINING ELIGIBILITY FOR, OR THE AMOUNT OF, 
FEDERAL PUBLIC BENEFITS.
    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
payments made under a State eugenics compensation program shall not be 
considered as income or resources in determining eligibility for, or 
the amount of, any Federal public benefit.
    (b) Definitions.--For purposes of this section:
        (1) Federal public benefit.--The term ``Federal public 
    benefit'' means--
            (A) any grant, contract, loan, professional license, or 
        commercial license provided by an agency of the United States 
        or by appropriated funds of the United States; and
            (B) any retirement, welfare, health, disability, public or 
        assisted housing, postsecondary education, food assistance, 
        unemployment benefit, or any other similar benefit for which 
        payments or assistance are provided to an individual, 
        household, or family eligibility unit by an agency of the 
        United States or by appropriated funds of the United States.
        (2) State eugenics compensation program.--The term ``State 
    eugenics compensation program'' means a program established by 
    State law that is intended to compensate individuals who were 
    sterilized under the authority of the State.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
99-927.

#### State v. Carper.

Fayette App. No. CA98-06-009. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists on the following question stated in the court of appeals’ entry filed April 16, 1999:

“Does Ohio’s involuntary manslaughter statute (R.C. 2903.04[B]) as applied to a minor misdemeanor traffic offense which results in a vehicular homicide violate the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Section 9, Article I of the Ohio Constitution?”

' *Sua sponte,*cause held for the decision in 98-2144, *State v. Weitbrecht,*Holmes App. No. 97CA588; briefing schedule stayed.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.01


                                Subsidiaries of
                    Occupational Health + Rehabilitation Inc



Occupational Orthopaedic Center, Inc.,
a Rhode Island corporation.

CM Occupational Health, Limited Liability Company,
a Maine limited liability company
(also doing business as The Health Center)

OHR/MMC, Limited Liability Company,
a Maine limited liability company
(also doing business as Occupational Health + Rehabilitation,
An affiliate of Maine Health )

Kent/OH+R, LLC
a Rhode Island limited liability company

OH+R/Boston, LLC,
a Massachusetts limited liability company
(also doing business as Occupational Health + Rehabilitation)
EPA Reg. No. 73148-1