alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> UT

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      571,568
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      2,547
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         128,577
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        40,440
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  74,548
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 817,680
<COMMON>                                        51,418
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       43,233
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            176,357
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 271,008
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           26,447
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           210,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  42,238
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       58
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     14,890
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   547
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 252,492
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  817,680
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      417,355
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            11,337
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     109,899
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     178,597
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         29,943
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,905
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  31,848
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        12,583
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,265
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      1,429
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   17,836
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        20,336
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       12,581
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         100,628
<EPS-BASIC>                                    34.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    34.69


</TABLE>
# CE2004084EN.01039301.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/393 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/393

---

(2004/C 84 E/0455)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0422/04

by Camilo Nogueira Román (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(17 February 2004)

Subject:   High-speed Lubian to Orense rail link giving central access to Galicia

Subject:

The Spanish Government has just announced the changing of the route of the Lubian-Orense high-speed link in Galicia, which is now to have a double electric track. The modification raises the cost of this line to EUR 1 608 million. Has the Spanish Government submitted a request for funding for this line? What is the deadline for the whole of the line to be completed?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(22 March 2004)

(22 March 2004)

The section of high-speed rail line between Lubián and Orense is not part of the current trans-European rail network (TEN-T) defined in 1996 (1). Work on this section of rail line is therefore not being funded from the TEN-T budget; nor has funding been received from the ERDF or the Cohesion Fund.

1

The section of high-speed rail line between Lubián and Orense is however included in the Commission's proposals in the current revision of the Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network. It forms part of priority project 19, ‘High-speed rail interoperability on the Iberian peninsula’. When the revised guidelines, including project 19, are adopted by Parliament and the Council, the section of high-speed rail line between Lubián and Orense will be eligible for Community support from the TEN-T budget.

According to information received from the Spanish representative in the High-Level Group on the trans-European transport network chaired by Karel Van Miert, the section will be completed in 2010.

---

(1)  Decision No 1692/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 on Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network, OJ L 228, 9.9.1996.

1

---
# CE2004084EN.01052901.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/529 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/529

---

(2004/C 84 E/0604)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0048/04

by Camilo Nogueira Román (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(20 January 2004)

Subject:   Location of the European fisheries monitoring agency in Galicia

Subject:

At the most recent Council meeting held in Brussels under the Italian presidency in the context of the decisions on the location of various agencies, it was agreed to create a European fisheries monitoring agency to be located in the Spanish state.

Has it already been agreed to locate this agency in Vigo, as has been suggested in Galician government and media circles?

Given that, according to some reports, the agency will not begin operations until 2005, what are the current forecasts?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(18 February 2004)

(18 February 2004)

We welcome the decision of the Member States' representatives, when they met at Head of State and Government level at Brussels on 13 December, that a European Fisheries Control Agency will be set up and located in Spain.

It appears that the Spanish Government wishes the agency to be located at Vigo in Galicia but we have no official confirmation of this choice.

In March we shall be sending the Council and Parliament a proposal for a Regulation establishing the Agency.

---
' 

._,. 

rMS• 

- • • 

c 

0 

p 

y DATE: 23 March 1953 

TO Supreme Allied Commander Europe 

FROM : United States Joint Chiefs of Staff 

SUBJECT: United States Views on SHAPE Proposals for a Service of Tactical 

Radio Intercept Intelligence for SACEUR1s Ccmmand 

1. The Joint Chiefs of Staff have considered your letter of 24 

Februal"J' 195.3, subject: "Proposals tor a Service of Tactical Radio 

Intelligence for SA:CEUR' s Command n. · They are in agreement that steps 

should be ta.ken without delq to include in SHAPE war plans pr.ovision 

tor a service or intelligence derived trom the interception or the 

enem;y 1s tactical radio transmissions. 

2. The Joint Chiefs ot Starr also are in agreement with the principles 

proposed to goveni such planning and with the proposed security regulations 

described in Annexa A and B respectively to SHAPE/11.3/5.3.. It the other 

addressees of SHAPE/11.3/53 are in agreement with .Annexa A and B thereto, 

the Joint Chiefs or Sta~f are prepared to authorize U.S. participation in 

discussions on this matter • 

.3. The Director of the National Security Agency, Washington 25, D. C. , 

is the authority with wham the Assistant Chief of Staff' (I) SH.APE, on behalf 

ot SACEUR, may communicate on these matters. 

4. Annex C of SHAPE-/11.3/53 has been referred to the Director, NSA, 

for study. U.S. views on this Annex will be presented by the representative 

ot the Director, NSA, when discussions are opened on these matters. 

TOP SECRB'f' 

eclassified and a roved for release b NSA on 01-27-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352
Order filed, November 28, 2012

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00859

- CV

____________ JEREMY CHARLES , Appellant

V.
MURRAY HILL; VICTORI A GARDEN APTS , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law #4

Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 11

- CCV

- 045792



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due November 16, 2012

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The
record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Roger Adair , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM (identify specific financial statements) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,763
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,092
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,002
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,756
<PP&E>                                         194,498
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,146
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 273,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,392
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      97,198
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   273,991
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               176,967
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  154,718
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,522
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,844
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,538
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,306
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        2,954
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,352
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000887920
<NAME> TREGA BIOSCIENCES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,393
<SECURITIES>                                     1,041
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,176
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,975
<PP&E>                                           8,198
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,019
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,661
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,155
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,491
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,661
<SALES>                                            313
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,377
<CGS>                                              332
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,579
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    66
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 404
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,673)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,673)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,673)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.47)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                            52,692
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    195,946
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                      424,377
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 704,825
<PP&E>                                         4,219,734
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,841,246
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,093,173
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            413,592
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                      11,129,954
<OTHER-SE>                                   (10,098,256)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,093,173
<SALES>                                          402,186
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 402,186
<CGS>                                            409,109
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    409,109
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 197,749
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                14,955
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (210,364)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (210,364)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0 
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (210,364)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0
        



</TABLE>
# CE2004088EN.01069301.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/693 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/693

---

(2004/C 88 E/0711)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0221/04

by Maurizio Turco (NI) to the Commission

(30 January 2004)

Subject:   Investigations by the Milan public prosecutor into the auditors Grant Thornton and Deloitte in connection with the Parmalat scandal

Subject:

The Milan public prosecutor is investing auditors Grant Thornton and Deloitte in connection with the Parmalat affair. The charge relates to a breach of law 231 on legal persons, which is based on a European Community directive. On 31 December 2003 two Grant Thornton auditors were arrested and the investigations subsequently focused on two Deloitte and Touche auditors who were charged with market rigging, false auditing, false company statements and aggravated fraud.

Is the Commission aware of this situation?

If it has any connections with Grant Thornton and/or Deloitte, does it intend to contact the Milan judicial authorities to ascertain the reasons for the investigations and the nature of any breaches of law and the involvement of the companies, not least in order to protect the Community institutions against damage from possible illegalities?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(11 March 2004)

(11 March 2004)

The Commission is closely following the developments in relation with the Parmalat corporate failure. However, it is too early to draw any final conclusions from this very complex case as judicial enquiries are on going.

As far as audit work that needs to be performed by Grant Thornton and Deloitte in relation with specific projects funded by the Commission, the Commission will continue to monitor such work so as to ensure that it is carried out to the highest standards.

---
REF ID:A71952 

lJr. stew.rt s. Cairns 

Cl\alnan. Departllent ot Jlathemttcs 

Ulrl.Terait7 of Illinoia 

Vrbana. Illinois 

Dear Stewart: 

!his iii 1n repl.J' to 70ur letters of 25 Karch and '1 April. 

Serialt ~~ 0 J- 3 -

Conaern.lng an, restrictions on new Civil Service appointments 

under llBli hiring policies I can state that ve a.re still in a podU01a to hire student11 vith 1213.thema.tieal training. However. we are 

somewhat c-artilled. by nev regulations and l am restricting hiring 

to Teey ~ial cl.asses o! people. 1 am prlm&rllT interested at 

the present time in people w1 th a PhD degree Yho have e. good background in a.nal.y-ais. J'or sueh :people I have in mind von: on ma.themtics of communication theoey Phus I ttould eon.aid.er Doob 1 s 

•tu.dent 1lannig<ln a prime prospect, and I ha.Te alread7 written to 

Mm asking him lf he voul.d lik.e to g,pplJ' fO'?' a Job. Inc1d.entall7 

I hBTen • t heard from him ,et. 

I ah.all be available on llond~y. April ro. when you are in 

Va.shington and am ~1:t71ng Hovte that you vill be here. We are 

both looking forward. to seeing you. 

1 have no obJeetions to ,o-ur menUoning me in re11uesting 

pend ni on !or Donald to termi.na.te hi a work in !ehool on Jtme 26 

u plmmed.. I hope it ""1ll do some good but I have 'S7 doubts. 

!be acuttlebutt that 7611 heard that Curlis bs rasigned is 

correct. However. 1 t 1 s not abvi ous that 1 t. was ill protest OTer 

the J.a\,ill ea.ae. CurU1 has not Mid 1 t was and U is !airl7 veil 

known that he was planning to reaiga to gei into aeadem1.c vork at 

abcnlt the Use he requested and reeeiT&d a J'88%''e lea.Te of absence 

in order ~ work at larTazd.. Rovie. Rina aad 1 t'eel that his ac-

\1011 vUl not affect the conduct of SCAMP Wt 8t3111l6%". RoveveJ". 

if aJJT\hlJlg U.elOpa I 'Shall be certaill io let 70u mow. 

I wonder if 7011 ooulcl ch ae a. f a'f'O?'. We a!'e •erT ux1ou to 

a&e fts.zmigaa• • thesis vte\her he e-nmtttally coma to work here or 

not. If it 1e a\ all poedble ve would appreciate a. copy of bis 

theaia even u· 1 t le olllT Oll a loan baaia. 

:a.. J. • J.llDLAA 

Chief 

•theaa\tcal Jteseareh It Yid.on 

Offtee of lneuell ad »e.elopaa.t 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 02-12-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Consortium Service
Management  Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005 (the "Report"),  I, K. Bruce Jones, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  April 3, 2006
                                                          /s/ K. Bruce Jones
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         K. Bruce Jones
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


         The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350)  and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.














                                                                    Exhibit 32.1
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
# CE2004084EN.01065401.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/654 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/654

---

(2004/C 84 E/0738)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0688/04

by Paulo Casaca (PSE) to the Commission

(4 March 2004)

Subject:   Application of Regulation No 1788/2003 Article 10(3)

Subject:

For operational transparency and control reasons, the Azores milk producers' representative bodies have claimed that the calculation of the possible reallocation of the unused parts of the reference quantity be made not only at the level of each buyer and national level, but also at the intermediate level of the regions.

Does the Commission believe that this request contradicts the ‘objective criteria’ referred to in Regulation (EC) No 1788/2003 Article 10? (1)

1

Is the Commission aware of any case in which the Member State is going to make use of this intermediate stage in the reallocation of reference quantities?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(1 April 2004)

(1 April 2004)

Article 10(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1788/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing a levy in the milk and milk products sector clearly lays down the two ways in which unused quantities are to be reallocated, one exclusively at national level, the other firstly at the level of the purchaser and thereafter at national level where appropriate. This at once rules out any regional stage.

It is for the sake of sound management and so as not to weaken the role of the purchaser that the regional level is not referrred to in Article 10(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1788/2003.

For deliveries it was agreed to give purchasers prime managerial responsibility for the declaration of milk collected and collection of the additional levy. That is why unused quantities can be reallocated at purchaser level.

Thus the system is not compatible with regionalised management. Purchasers' collection areas are not necessarily bounded by regional borders — they may collect milk in more than one region.

---

(1)  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 123.

1

---