alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the Unaudited Statements of Operations and Accumulated
Deficit for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2000 and the
Unaudited Balance Sheet at March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                     441,728
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              350,714
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                194,103
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           988,248
<PP&E>                                     340,631
<DEPRECIATION>                             328,616
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,000,263
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       60,981
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                 10,000
<COMMON>                                   122,824
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,000,263
<SALES>                                    410,286
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           413,246
<CGS>                                      235,009
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              317,491
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,619
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             88,866
<INCOME-TAX>                                79,616
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         79,616
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                79,616
<EPS-BASIC>                                 0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.01


</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-0810-19

RICARDO MATA, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ORDER REGARDING REPRESENTATION

HIDALGO COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Appellee was indicted for Aggravated Kidnapping, Child Trafficking and Sexual Assault of

a Child in cause number CR-2611-16-B in the 93 District Court of Hidalgo County. Appellee filed rd

a motion to suppress which was granted on July 11, 2017; the State of Texas appealed this order on

July 31, 2017. The court of appeals affirmed in part insofar as it pertains to the roadside statements,

but reversed the judgment of the trial court as to the written statement. Mata v. State, No. 13-17-

00494-CR (Tex. App. —Corpus Christi, delivered July 11, 2019). The State Prosecuting Attorney’s
petition for discretionary review was granted by this Court on September 18, 2019. Appellee is

entitled to representation before this Court at this time. See Article 1.051(a)(d)(2), V.A.C.C.P. 

Appellee is without representation in this Court. Accordingly, the trial court is ordered to determine

if Appellee is currently represented by counsel, and if so, to inform this court who represents

Appellee. If Appellee is not currently represented by counsel and desires counsel, the trial court

must first determine whether Appellee is indigent. If the trial court finds Appellee is indigent, that

court shall appoint an attorney to represent Appellee before this court in regard to PDR No. PD0810-19, in accord with the provisions of Articles 1.051 and 26.04, V.A.C.C.P. Any hearing

conducted pursuant to this order shall be held within 30 days of the date of this order. The trial

court's order appointing counsel, any findings of fact, affidavits, or transcription of the court

reporter's notes and any other supplementation of the record shall be returned to this court within 45

days of the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 15 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 th

DO NOT PUBLISH
### Devany , Denni s (OST) 

# ^gT-^«sr^/f^/-z^V7
-

From : Sent : To : Cc : Subject : JLempka l (gaol.co m Monday , Novembe r08 , 201 0 10:35 A M supervisor@town.massena.ny.u s Devany , Denni s (OST) ; jmacaulay@twcny.rr.com ; anicolaighwcny.rr.com ; jwicke@twcny.rr.com ; craiti@twcny.rr.co m ^-. ^ Massen a Airpor

t i;- 4

Novembers , 201 0 Goo dmornin g Mr

. Gray , —G O I amwritin g regardin g th e upcomin g meetin g t o b e hel dthi s Wednesday , Novembe r 10 , concernin g th e Tow n Council' s decisio n a s t o whic h airlin e wil l provid e servic e fro mth e Massen aInternationa l Airport t o outside destinations

. I amhopin g tha t

yo u wil l continu e t o allo w Cap e Ai r t o provid e th e servic e betwee n Alban y an d Massen aa s i t

i s avita l servic e for

thos e fro mMassen atravelin g t o anywher e i n th e greate r Capita l Distric t are aan dfor

man y o f thos e wh o wis h t o continu e thei r fligh t sout h t o Ne w Yor

k City an dothe r destination s aroun dth e country
. I especiall y as k

you r consideratio n i n ligh t

o f th e fac t tha t Gulfstrea mha s recentl y filedfor bankruptcy

. A n airlin e tha t

doe s not see mfinancially stabl e shoul dno t b e brough t

i n t o tak e th e plac e o f

acompan y tha t i s providin g a

n excellen t

servic e itsel f

Thi s financial instabilit y als o lead s m e t o believ e that th e cos t t o fly o n Gulfstrea mwil l b e considerabl y highe r tha n what

w e no w pa y o n Cap e Air

. M y daughter , an dothe r

girl s fro maroundth e country , trave l o n Cap e Ai r fro mAlban y t o th e Hol y Nam e o f Jesu s Academ y i n Massena

. W e hav e alway s foun dth e Cap e Ai r staf f very willin g t o accommodat e u s (eve n goin g abov e an dbeyon dth e cal l o f duty i n severa l instances) , very friendly , an d thei r price s very reasonable

. Th e flight schedul e i s als o convenient

. I f w e di dnot

hav e thi s Alban y service , man y o f

th e girl s woul db e force dt o fly int o Logan Airport i n Bosto n whic h woul db e muc h mor e confusin g for

ayoun g girl , not

t o mentio n th e adde dtim e t o thei r flight an dexpense . Than k yo u s o muc h for

you r consideration ! Sincerely , Joa n K

. Lempk a Millbrook , New Yor

k 845-677-384 7 

## I
ALMADEN MINERALS LTD



COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Responsibilities and Duties



Each member of the Compensation Committee shall be independent of the Company within the meaning of all applicable legal and regulatory requirements (except in the circumstances, and only to the extent, permitted by all applicable legal and regulatory requirements).

The Compensation Committee shall have the following duties and responsibilities:

1.     Review the Companys overall compensation strategy and objectives;

2.     Review and assess the Chief Executive Officer's performance against pre-agreed objectives and recommend to the Board the compensation of the CEO (in each case, without the CEO being present during the deliberations and vote);

3.     Review performance assessments of the Companys other officers and, upon the advice of the CEO, recommend to the Board the compensation of the officers;

4.     Review and recommend to the Board policies related to providing Company stock to executives and employees (e.g., stock option plan, share purchase plan);

5.     Review executive appointments, employment agreements and terminations;

6.     Review senior management succession plans and participate in the recruitment of executives, especially succession to the CEO;

7.     Review and recommend to the Board the amount and form of directors' compensation;

8.     Review and recommend the disclosures describing executive compensation and development.
# CE2004084EN.01008903.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/89 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/89

---

(2004/C 84 E/0108)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3713/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject:   Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Pisa

Subject:

With reference to question E-0969/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of Pisa (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the Altener II programme, the Commission replied to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

1

Can the Commission provide information on any projects submitted since the date of its reply (25 April 2003)?

---

(1)  OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

1

---
# CE2004078EN.01068701.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/687 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/687

---

(2004/C 78 E/0733)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0417/04

by Ilda Figueiredo (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(9 February 2004)

Subject:   Sackings from the Finex Group factory

Subject:

The Finnish Finex Group owns a clothing factory in Nogueira, Maia, Portugal, which used to employ some 1 000 workers. Finex has already pressurised over half of them to accept dismissal agreements. Of the current 430 workers, some 300 women are now being pressurised to consent to unacceptable agreements on their dismissal by the end of this month. It should be noted that this company has received various subsidies.

Can the Commission answer the following:

| 1. | How much Community subsidy has been paid to the Finex Group in Portugal and in other EU countries? |
| --- | --- |

1.

How much Community subsidy has been paid to the Finex Group in Portugal and in other EU countries?

| 2. | What measures are the Commission and the Portuguese Government going to take with a view to defending the employment and all the rights of Finex's workers, most of whom are women? |
| --- | --- |

2.

What measures are the Commission and the Portuguese Government going to take with a view to defending the employment and all the rights of Finex's workers, most of whom are women?

| 3. | Is the Commission prepared to demand that the subsidies paid to the Finex Group should be repaid, if Finex continues to put pressure on its workers with a view to getting rid of them? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Is the Commission prepared to demand that the subsidies paid to the Finex Group should be repaid, if Finex continues to put pressure on its workers with a view to getting rid of them?

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(19 February 2004)

(19 February 2004)

The Commission is collecting the information it needs to answer the question. It will communicate its findings as soon as possible.

---
• • 

REF ID:A275561 y 

CGN?2iDENT•1A;L HEADQUARTERS 

UNITED STATES ARMY SECURITY AGENCY 

ARLINGTON HALL STATION 

ARLINGTON 12, VIRGINIA 

GAS23 350.05 26 JUN 195G 

SUBJECT: Classification of "German Military Ciphers from February to 

November 1918" {U) 

TO: Director 

National Security •\gency 

Fort George G. Meade, Mary land 

1. Reference Disposition rorm, your hecidquarters, to Conunanding 

Officer, Signal Intelligence .'\gency, Arlington Hall Station, 11 June 

1958, c;ubJE'Ct srune as above. 

2. Dl'pnrtmcnt of the '\rmy Circulctr Nr 127, 23 December 1953, 1nplemcntcd Lxccutive Order 10501. Paiagraph 2g of this C'1rcular 'lnd 

pa ... c:igraph. II .\, P-irt 6 1 Ind oc;ure l to DOD Oirc<.'tl.Vc Nr CJ200.l, 8 Ju]y 

1957, c;t-itc th.Lt 111Ul material diro?ctly rel i.ted to cryptosystl'ms formerlj' 

clac;;nfied ~R'>TIUCTED, is upgrnd<"d to CONFIDr.NTIAL." 

3. Your 1.ttcnt1on 1c; imitcu to letter, G\.523 350.0S, Hq UC,'\.<,\, 

16 Jmmary 19=18, •mbJcct• "llequec;t for Information," and your lc;t Iniorsl'ment thereto 'lu.ch st1.tes -that "inforMation of this type ~houl1l 

be classi fieJ sufficiently to ni.al~e it unavailable for uncontro1 led publication <:!.Ill th,at all official cryptanalysis is a tyJ>e Of rLCti V1 tv f"hat 

should be protected constantly no matter how old it may become." US 

\rmy Socuri f'y \gcncy c-oncurs in tlu.s statertent. 

4. In consonance with p::irngrrph 2 above, thic;; \gene'' con .. 1d~1 s 

subJel"t doctmtPnt to be clasc;i ficd CONFIDENTIAL. 

5. Copy of a lotter from Hr. Tiry"ln 1 ech tor of "The Cryptog1 run," 

dated 2 June 1958,, which is related to subJect matter is incloc;cd herewith for your infonnatio11. Request any comments wluch your Agency may 

desire to have included in this Agency's repl" to Mr. D1ynn's letter. 

FOR THE CHIEF, U"> AIBIY SECURITY AGENCY: 

2 Incl 

1. Cy lt1, 2 Jun 58 

2. War Dept Technic1.1 Paper,, 

subJ • "German Mi]it•ry Cipher-;" 

DONALD J 

Capt Ml(AGCJ 

Asst Ad] Gen
NSA Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Complaints Data

Posted Pursuant to the No Fear Act

FY20

I. Complaints of Discrimination Filed

Number of Complaints Filed 17

Number of Individuals Filing Complaints 17

Number of Individuals Filing Two or More Complaints 0

II. Bases of Complaints Filed

Age 8

Color 5

Disability 8

National Origin 4

Race 8

Religion 0

Reprisal 4

Sex 8

1. Equal Pay Act 0

2. Pregnancy Discrimination Act 1

III. Issues of Complaints Filed

Assignment of Duties 4

Awards 0

Disciplinary Action

Warning 0

Removal 3

Duty Hours 0

Evaluation/Appraisal 0

Examination/Test 0

Harassment (Sexual) 0

(Non-Sexual) 7

Promotion/Non-selection 7

Reasonable Accommodation 0

Reassignment - Denied 0

Termination 3

Terms and Conditions of Employment 3

Time and Attendance 0

Training 0

IV. Average Complaints Processing Time to Completion

All Investigations

1. Hearing Not Requested 284.3

2. Hearing Requested 709.58

Final Actions by Agency
1. Processing Time Without a Hearing/FAD 59

2. Processing Time With a Hearing/Final Order 60.8

V. Dismissals

Number of Dismissals 6

Average Days Pending At the Time of Dismissal 96

VI. Withdrawals

Number of Complaints Withdrawn by Complainants 1

VII. Findings of Discrimination

Findings Rendered with a Hearing

Number of Findings 0

Findings Rendered without a Hearing

Number of Findings 0

Issues of Findings of Discrimination

Number of Issues 0

Bases of Findings of Discrimination

Number of Bases 0

VIII. Pending Complaints Carried Over From Previous FYs

Complaints Open Any Length of Time During Reporting Year 52

1. Number of Individuals Filing These Complaints 52

2. Number of These Complaints Currently Pending 27

Status of These Cases:

1. Investigation 17

2. Final Agency Action 0

3. Hearing 19

4. Appeal 4

IX. Complaints Pending Any Length of Time This Fiscal Year Not 

Investigated Within 180 Days (plus any authorized extensions)

1
I 

USCIB: 29.1/1.3 

12 January 1954 

!9f SEGH!i'i' 

~PIJIDUM FQR THE J:1EMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Loan of ROCKEX Crypto System to West Germans. 

1. The enclosure, considered by USCIB at the Ninety-Ninth (Special) 

Meeting, is forwarded for information. 

2. THE ENCLOSURE WITH THIS DOCHJMENT CONTAINS COMMUNICATIONS 

INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION AND SHALL BE HANDLED ONLY IN CHANNELS EXPRESSLY 

PROVIDED FOR COMINT. 

Enclosure 

Copy of GCHQ msg 081850Z/l/54. 

USCIB: 29.1/1:.3 

aptain, • • Navy MaWQ'tive Secretary, USCIB 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-18-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

T-OP ii:CRi: T 

20 
, REF ID: A61204· 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 2 Q 

COPY OF SIGNAL fP,QM Ml, ._I ___ _.IT() BRIGAPIER TILIMAU. 

From: G,C,H.Q. DTG: 081850Z/l/54. 

To: S.L.0. 1 Washington. 

Subject: Your M@morandum CIB IQQQlO, 

Sequence of events was as follows. Germans approached U.K. 

High C9nmdssioriers representative in Bonn concerning provision of 

cypher facilities for Foreign Ninisters Conference in Berlin. 

They asked specifically for four T.528 to provide circuit between 

Federal representative Berlin and Foreign Ministry Bonn. Ve have 

replied that we have no T.52S and that is the limit of action 

so far with Germans, 

.2, Though Germans may look askance at Rockex with U,K. tapes 

it is not in fact intended to retain any .monitoring copy or tapes 

supplied. Sole objects of proposed action are . 

(a) To make a co-operative response to German approach 

(b) To ensl.ll"e seclll"ity or information given to them by 

ourselves and possibly also 

(c) To- glean a little information if occasion allows about 

West German cryptographic progress am trends, 

3, Failing assistance from us, Germans could and perhaps would. use 

OXP but they obviously want something quicker. They might succeed in 

raising T.528 elsewhere and we could not be sure they would use tllem 

securely, 

4. There is no reason to expect any implications to tS/UK'Comint, 

We should be giving West Germans a crypto principle that they already 

possess and there is no-question ot a:ny mention of Comint, · 

5. Possibility of precedent in West German eyes is we think 

negl;igible especially in view of what must happen if and when EDC 

come into existence. 

'f'OP SEC RE 'f
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT July 20, 2007 No. 06-2674 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant ,
v . AMEN E. JUMAH, Defendant-Appellee

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 04 CR 237-- John W. Darrah, Judge

.

ORDER

Before RIPPLE, KANNE and SYKES, Circuit Judges

. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. The opinion in this case, entered on July 16, 2007, is amended as follows: The case citation appearing on pages 17 and 20, is changed from United States v. Dominguez Rodriguez , 542 U.S. 74, to United States v. Dominguez Benitez , 542 U.S. 74.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.4

                                    CONSENT

  We hereby consent to the reference to our firm under the heading "Experts" in
the Prospectus constituting part of the Note Exchange Offer on Form S-4 (File
No. 333-xxxx) of Arch Communications, Inc. As noted therein, our review and
input only pertains to FCC matters unique to Arch included in the description
of the regulatory requirements under the Communications Act and the
Telecommunications Act of 1996, and the regulations thereunder, set forth under
"Risk Factors--Government regulation may burden operations" and "Industry
Overview--Regulation." Stockholders of Arch should not rely on Wilkinson,
Barker, Knauer, LLP with respect to any other matters or any other sections of
the document.

                                          Wilkinson, Barker, Knauer LLP

                                                 /s/ Kenneth D. Patrich
                                          By: _________________________________
                                                    Kenneth D. Patrich

Date:  July 15, 1999
Molly Joseph Ward Secretary of Natural Resources 

# COMMONWEALTH ofVIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Street address: 629 East Main Street, Richmond , Virginia 23219

Mailing address: P
.O
. Box 1 105 , Richmond , Virginia 23218 www .deq.virginia.gov



## FEB 0 1 2016
David Arnold, Acting Director Air Protection Division (3APOO) U.S. EPA, Region III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 David K
. Paylor Director (804) 698

-4020 1

- 800-592

-5482

Reference: VOC Emission Standards, Miscellaneous Solvent Cleaning and Adhesive Application (Rev. D09) Dear Mr. Arnold: Pursuant to the requirements of§ 110 ofthe Clean Air Act, we are officially requesting approval ofa revision to the Commonwealth ofVirginia State Implementation Plan approved and submitted under the authority of§ 10
. 1-1185 ofthe Code ofVirginia and in accordance with the requirements of40 CFR Part 51 (Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of Implementation Plans). This revision consists oftwo new regulations: Article 57 (Emission Standards for Industrial Solvent Cleaning Operations in the Northern Virginia VOC Emissions Control Area, 8-hour Ozone Standard) and Article 58 (Emission Standards fm; Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesive Application Processes in the Northern Virginia Volatile Organic Compound Emissions Control Area, 8-hour Ozone Standard). These regulations were adopted in order to meet the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Control Technique Guidelines (CTGs) for these source types. The regulation amendments were adopted by the State Air Pollution Control Board on June 19,2015 under the authority of§ 10.1-1308 ofthe Code ofVirginia. Enclosed are the following: 1. A true copy ofthe official regulation (Revision D09) which was published in the Virginia Register ofRegulations on November 30, 2015 after being duly adopted by the State Air

### Pollution Control Board on June 19, 2015, certified by the Office ofthe Attorney General as within the Board's statutory authority on June 22,2015 and thus fully enforceable under Virginia law, and submitted to the Virginia Registrar on behalfofthe Board by the Department of Environmental Quality as a true and accurate copy ofthe duly adopted regulation on October 29, 2015. 2. Certification ofpublic participation activities and compliance with both state administrative procedures and the public hearing requirements of40 CFR 51.102. 3. Record ofhearing and summary ofcomment. For purposes ofthis submittal, certain provisions are being included for information purposes only and are not to be construed as part ofthe Commonwealth ofVirginia State Implementation Plan; these provisions are specifically identified in Enclosure 2 ofthis submittal. Ifyou have any questions or need additional information, please let us know.

David K. Paylor DKP\kgs TEMPLATES\SIP-REG\REGOO SIP\NONATIN PLANS\20 16\D09-SIP.DOC Enclosures
**Exhibit3.2**

 

**CERTIFICATEOF AMENDMENT**

**OF**

**CERTIFICATEOF INCORPORATION**

**OF**

**ITERIS,INC.**

**(aDelaware corporation)**

 

                                Iteris,Inc., a Delaware corporation, does hereby certify that:

 

                1.             The first paragraph of Paragraph Aof Article FOURTH of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation ofsaid corporation is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read asfollows:

 

                                “A.          The total number of shares of stock which the Corporationshall have authority to issue is 72,000,000, consisting of 70,000,000 shares ofCommon Stock, par value $.10 per share (the “Common Stock”), and 2,000,000shares of Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share (the “Preferred Stock”).”

 

                2.             Theforegoing amendment has been duly adopted in accordance with Section 242 of theGeneral Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

 

                INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Amendment onthis 25th day of September 2007.

 

| /S/ ABBAS MOHADDES                     |
|----------------------------------------|
| Abbas Mohaddes                         |
| Chief Executive Officer  and President |
|                                   |

 

----