10714 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Notices 

3,262,059. The amended complaint also 

alleges that an industry in the United 

States exists as required by subsection 

(a)(2) of section 337. The amended 

complaint further alleges violations of 

section 337 based upon the importation 

into the United States, or in the sale of, 

certain light reflectors and components, 

packaging, and related advertising 

thereof by reason of false advertising, 

the threat or effect of which is to destroy 

or substantially injure an industry in the 

United States. The Commission’s notice 

of investigation named numerous 

respondents including Sinowell. See 79 

FR 47156–57. The Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations was named as a 

party to the investigation. Id. at 47157. 

On December 16, 2014, the 

Commission determined not to review 

an ID (Order No. 12) granting a motion 

to terminate the investigation as to 

respondents The Hydro Source II, Inc.; 

Bizright, LLC; and Silversun, Inc., based 

upon settlement agreements. 

On December 16, 2014, Sunlight 

moved to terminate the investigation as 

to Sinowell based upon a settlement 

agreement between Sunlight and 

Sinowell. That same day, Sunlight also 

moved to terminate the investigation as 

to the remaining respondents Groco 

Enterprises, LLC; Good Nature Garden 

Supply; Aqua Serene, Inc.; Aurora 

Innovations, Inc.; Big Daddy Garden 

Supply, Inc.; Insun, LLC; Lumz’N 

Blooms, Ltd. Corp; ParluxAmerica LLP; 

and Zimbali Group, Inc., based on 

withdrawal of the amended complaint 

as to these respondents. Sunlight 

asserted that there are no agreements, 

written or oral, express or implied 

between the parties concerning the 

subject matter of this investigation, 

other than the confidential settlement 

agreement between Sunlight and 

Sinowell. Sunlight also asserted that 

granting the motions is in the public 

interest and will conserve the resources 

of the Commission. The Commission’s 

Investigative Attorney filed responses in 

support of the motions. 

On January 22, 2015, the ALJ issued 

an ID (Order No. 17), granting the 

motion to terminate the investigation as 

to Sinowell. The ALJ found that the 

settlement agreement appears to resolve 

the dispute between Sunlight and 

Sinowell, and that granting the motion 

would not adversely affect the public 

interest factors. No petitions for review 

were filed. 

On January 27, 2015, the ALJ issued 

an ID (Order No. 18), granting the 

motion to terminate the investigation as 

to the remaining respondents. The ALJ 

found that no extraordinary 

circumstances exist that would prevent 

the requested termination of the 

remaining respondents from the 

investigation. The ALJ also found that 

the parties have complied with the 

requirements of Rule 210.21(a). No 

petitions for review were filed. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the two subject IDs. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

section 210 of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: February 23, 2015. 

William R. Bishop, 

Supervisory Hearings and Information 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2015–04089 Filed 2–26–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1110—NEW] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection 

eComments Requested; Approval of 

an Existing Collection in Use Without 

an OMB Control Number; FBI 

Expungement Form (FD–1114) 

AGENCY: Federal Bureau of 

Investigation, Department of Justice. 

ACTION: 60-day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice 

(DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation 

(FBI), Criminal Justice Information 

Services (CJIS) Division, will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted for 60 days until April 

28, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have additional comments 

especially on the estimated public 

burden or associated response time, 

suggestions, or need a copy of the 

proposed information collection 

instrument with instructions or 

additional information, please contact 

Rachel K. Hurst, Management and 

Program Analyst, FBI, CJIS, Biometric 

Services Section, Customer Support 

Unit, Module E–1, 1000 Custer Hollow 

Road, Clarksburg, West Virginia 26306 

(facsimile: 304–625–5392). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written 

comments and suggestions from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed collection of information 

are encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Evaluate whether and if so how the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected can be 

enhanced; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Approval of collection in use without an 

OMB control number. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: FBI 

Expungement Form. 

(3) Agency form number: FD–1114. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: Primary: This form is utilized 

by criminal justice and affiliated 

judicial agencies to request appropriate 

removal of criminal history information 

from an individual’s record. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: It is estimated that 152,430 

respondents are authorized to complete 

the form which would require 

approximately 10 minutes. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: There are an estimated 

89,591 total annual burden hours 

associated with this collection. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Jerri Murray, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Two Constitution 

Square, 145 N Street NE., 3E.405B, 

Washington, DC 20530. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Notices 10715 

Dated: February 23, 2015. 

Jerri Murray, 

Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2015–04122 Filed 2–26–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—Members of SGIP 2.0, Inc. 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

January 14, 2015, pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), 

Members of SGIP 2.0, Inc. (‘‘MSGIP 

2.0’’) has filed written notifications 

simultaneously with the Attorney 

General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing changes in its 

membership. The notifications were 

filed for the purpose of extending the 

Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of 

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages 

under specified circumstances. 

Specifically, Cetecom, Milpitas, CA; and 

PG&E, San Francisco, CA, have been 

added as parties to this venture. Also, 

Smarthome Laboratories, Boulder, CO; 

Gridtest Systems, Inc., Westlake Village, 

CA; Eaton Corporation, Arden, NC; 

Hypertek, Inc., North Potomac, MD; 

Pepco Holdings, Inc., Washington, DC; 

Schneider Electric, Norcross, GA; 

SunSpec Alliance, Scotts Valley, CA; 

Tendril, Boulder, CO; American 

Association for Laboratory 

Accreditation (A2LA), Frederick, MD; 

PPL Corporation, Louisville, KY; Alliant 

Energy, Madison, WI; EnerNOC, Inc., 

Boston, MA; and Newport Consulting 

Group, San Francisco, CA, have 

withdrawn as parties to this venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and MSGIP 2.0 

intends to file additional written 

notifications disclosing all changes in 

membership. 

On February 5, 2013, MSGIP 2.0 filed 

its original notification pursuant to 

Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department 

of Justice published a notice in the 

Federal Register pursuant to Section 

6(b) of the Act on March 7, 2013 (78 FR 

14836). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on October 27, 2014. A 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on December 2, 2014 (79 FR 71447). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2015–04099 Filed 2–26–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—Telemanagement Forum 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

January 16, 2015, pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), 

TeleManagement Forum (‘‘The Forum’’) 

has filed written notifications 

simultaneously with the Attorney 

General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing changes in its 

membership. The notifications were 

filed for the purpose of extending the 

Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of 

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages 

under specified circumstances. 

Specifically, REDERESIDUO, Sa ̃o Paulo, 

BRAZIL; Bell Integrator, Moscow, 

RUSSIA; Packet One Networks 

(Malaysia) Sdn Bhd, Petaling Jaya, 

MALAYSIA; PT Indonesia Comnets 

Plus (ICON+), Jakarta, INDONESIA; 

Inabox Group Limited, Sydney, 

AUSTRALIA; Mobitel (Pvt) Ltd., 

Colombo, SRI LANKA; Nextel Brazil, 

Sa ̃o Paolo, BRAZIL; Orange Espagne 

S.A.U, Pozuelo de Alarco ́n, SPAIN; 

Telenor d.o.o. Serbia, Beograd, SERBIA; 

DiGi Telecommunications Sdn Bhd, 

Shah Alam, MALAYSIA; Bharti Airtel 

Ltd., Delhi, INDIA; Netcomp Peru, 

Santiago de Surco, PERU; CanGo 

Networks Private Ltd., Chennai, INDIA; 

Trust5, Dublin, IRELAND; Wind 

Telecomunicazioni SpA, Roma, ITALY; 

Torry Harris Business Solutions Pvt 

Ltd., Bangalore, INDIA; DonRiver, Inc., 

Toronto, CANADA; Neural 

Technologies, Petersfield, UNITED 

KINGDOM; North State 

Communications, High Point, NC; 

Salesforce.com, San Francisco, CA; 

Coriant GmbH, Munich, GERMANY; 

Amcom Telecommunications Ltd., 

Perth, AUSTRALIA; FirstNet, Reston, 

VA; mm1 Consulting & Management 

PartG, Stuttgart, GERMANY; CrEAting 

Waves AS, Kongsberg, NORWAY; IT 

SERVICES & GOUVERNANCE, Paris, 

FRANCE; Pelatro, Bangalore, INDIA; 

Sistema Turkey, Istanbul, TURKEY; 

ChikPea, San Francisco, CA; Invercloud, 

Cork, IRELAND; and Stelligence 

Co.LTD, Bangkok, THAILAND, has been 

added as parties to this venture. 

The following members have changed 

their names: Elion Ettevo ̃tted AS to AS 

Eesti Telekom, Tallinn, ESTONIA; 

LeanMeanBusinessMachine to 

BumpConductor B.V., Driehuis, 

NETHERLANDS; and Nextel del Peru ́

SA to Entel Peru SA, Lima, PERU. 

The following members have 

withdrawn as parties to this venture: 

6fusion USA, Inc., Raleigh, NC; 

ArenaCore Pty Ltd., Melbourne, 

AUSTRALIA; Ariston Global, Pittsford, 

NY; Aspivia Ltd., Illovo, SOUTH 

AFRICA; Atoll Solution Ltd., Urom, 

HUNGARY; BEISIS, Ceroux Mousty, 

BELGIUM; Cloudscaling© (The 

Cloudscaling Group, Inc.), San 

Francisco, CA; Competitiveness Cluster 

Secured Communications Solutions, 

Valbonne Sophia Antipolis, FRANCE; 

Concordus Applications Inc., 

Sacramento, CA; Delta Partners FZ LLC, 

Dubai, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES; 

Desfosse ́s Consultation, Que ́bec, 

CANADA; Digital Enterprise Research 

Institute—NUI Galway, Galway, 

IRELAND; Dimetis GmbH, Dietzenbach, 

GERMANY; EuroCloud Netherlands, 

Haarlem, NETHERLANDS; First 

Derivatives Ireland Ltd., Dublin, 

IRELAND; Gilgamesh OSS Services, 

Weybridge, UNITED KINGDOM; Global 

Consultants Group 2020 C.A., Chacao, 

VENEZUELA; ICT Solutions Central 

America, Guatemala, GUATEMALA; 

Inetra, Novosibirsk, RUSSIA; Kreare 

Assessoria Empresarial, Sa ̃o Paulo, 

BRAZIL; Lyatiss, Lyon, FRANCE; 

Maveric Systems Limited, Chennai, 

INDIA; Network Laboratory, Department 

of Information and Communication 

Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 

Tokyo, JAPAN; Objective Systems 

Integrators, Folsom, CA; OneNet 

Ingenierı ́a S.A., Santiago, CHILE; OSS 

Evolution, Ottawa, CANADA; PiA 

Bilis ̧im Hizmetleri Ltd., Atas ̧ehir— 

I

 ̇stanbul, TURKEY; Pictor Consulting, 

Danderyd, SWEDEN; Proxwel, Bizerte, 

TUNISIA; Sagacity Softwares Private 

Limited, Pune, INDIA; Swiss Mobility 

Solutions, Alicante, SPAIN; Tele 

Greenland, Nuuk, GREENLAND; TM 

Forum Test, Morristown, NJ; 

TMSConsult.net, Kuala Lumpur, 

MALAYSIA; TURKSAT AS, Ankara, 

TURKEY; Universidad de Alcala ́, 

Madrid, SPAIN, Laboratorio de 

Medicio ́n de Software, Madrid, SPAIN; 

University of Deusto—Deusto Institute 

of Technology, Bilbao, SPAIN; Winitu 

Communications B.V., Bodegraven, 

NETHERLANDS; XINTEC S.A., 

Munsbach, LUXEMBOURG; Xirrus, 

Thousand Oaks, CA; ARSAT, Buenos 

Aires, ARGENTINA; ATANOO Europe 

GmbH, Zug, SWITZERLAND; CA 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES