alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
...... 

r - ... ,,_ -

F 

----

- ---- -

H!nUte!~ gt. Meeting Held 

!!. lfovenber ~ , 

l. Overlap of Shit'ta - The quest.ion of !'reaenti,. scheduled 

•orking hours tor the several ah:U't.s was discussed briefly'. It 

waa decided to request a turthcr study by tho Control orr1ee, before making a !1.rf:l recommendation to the Commanding Officer. 

2. T/O Adjust.m.ent - A. general diacussion was held and it •• 

decided t.he cOOl!littee would be prepared to take action regarding allocation of personnel to the several branches at the next .weet:ing. 

Approveds ________ _ 

w. Preston Corderman 

Colonel, Signal Corps 

Command in& 

C9NBbENTIAL 

Declassified and approved for re!~~~~)L~~ ~n 04-07-2014 pursuant to E .0. 1352fl
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2
                                                                    ------------

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                   -----------------------------------------


     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in this Registration Statement of our report dated February 2, 1999
included in Open Market, Inc's Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 1998
and to all references to our Firm included in this Registration Statement.

                                    /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
                                    -----------------------

                                    Arthur Andersen LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
October 21, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                             995
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,639
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,593
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,158
<PP&E>                                          12,629
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,243
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,763
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,965
<BONDS>                                          4,535
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           204
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,763
<SALES>                                          8,712
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,712
<CGS>                                            7,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,183
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,280
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    144
<INCOME-TAX>                                        44
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intermagnetics General Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending August 25, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Glenn H. Epstein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


   /s/ Glenn H. Epstein
-------------------------
Glenn H. Epstein
Chief Executive Officer
January 08, 2003
REF ID:A275454 

14 Januaey 1944 

Dear Travis: 

In a recent talk with Lieutenant Barasch, vho recently 

returned from his tour ot duty at BP, he told me ot a conversation with Mr. Park:tn, War Ott1oe Liaison Officer at BP, 

which aroused '1!f9' interest. R seems that somebody, maybe it was Parkin, had been studying the movements ot a certain 

Japanese vessel vhioh visited various points in the Pacific 

Theatre some months ago tor the probable purpose of distributing 

nev code books or cipher instructions to Japanese Military or 

Naval units. It possible, I would like to have whatever data 

can be me.de available on this matter tor it may have more than 

a theoretical interest or c-uriosity value. Possibly Lieut. 

Colonel Thompson can shed some light on this business. 

Mrs. Friedman and I were delighted to receive the beautiful Christmas card from you. We used to send out greetings yearly to our friends and mostly to their chagrin because they 

were invariably in some sort of cipher. Many of them complained that the.1.r enjoyment of Christmas Day was somewhat dampened by their struggles to re&d the Friedman greeting. O:f late 

years though, either our energies have run out or our ideas. 

At &?17 rate tor the duration we have called a halt to inventions 

ot this sort 1 so that is why you did not receive a card :from 

us. 

Mrs. Friedman tells me that she has met Mr. Foss and 

I am looking forward to seeing him again. I also had hoped 

to get a glj_mpse of .Mr. Hinsley, but so rar he bas been kept 

pretty busy. 

You will be pleased to learn no doubt that Joe Wenger is very much better and is at present recuperating in Florida. 

I expect him back the end of February and I think he will be 

returned to duty. 

I sav Rose the other day for just a minute or two and 

hope to have a longer cha•t with him in the near .f'uture. 

By this time I know that y-ou have been apprised of our 

intention to hold the second Japanese cont'erenae here and 

I am looking forward to seeing somebody trom BP. 

~1'::21';;'\~r:::s::;:;r 

_...;..JDJlitS 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
REF ID:A275454 

...... -- ..... --::...-

I hope that this letter vill find 7ou 1n better health 

and I vant to take this opportunity to convey to you and 

yours our beat wishes ror the Nev Year. 

Comms.nde~ E. W. Travis 

GO and GS 

81noerel7 J'Ours 1 

William F. Friedman
FIRST
      AMENDMENT TO THE

    PERCEPTRON,
      INC. 

    
      FIRST
        AMENDED AND RESTATED 2004 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

    

     

    Pursuant
      to the amendment provisions in Section 10.7 of the Perceptron, Inc. First
      Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (“Plan”) and the approval of the
      Board of Directors of Perceptron, Inc. (“Company”), the Plan is hereby amended
      as set forth below:

     

    1. Subject
      to approval of the shareholders of the Company, Section 1.6 of the Plan (Stock)
      shall be amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

     

    1.6
      Stock.
      The
      Corporation has reserved 1,000,000 shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock for
      issuance in conjunction with all Options and other stock-based awards to be
      granted under the Plan. All of the 1,000,000 shares of the Corporation’s Common
      Stock so reserved may be granted as ISOs. Shares subject to any unexercised
      portion of a terminated, cancelled or expired Option, Stock Appreciation Right,
      Restricted Stock grant, Restricted Stock Unit, or Performance Share Award
      granted hereunder may again be subjected to grants and awards under the Plan.
      In
      the event that an Option granted under the Plan is exercised by delivering
      shares of Common Stock that previously were acquired by exercising Options
      granted under the Plan, such shares of previously-acquired Common Stock so
      delivered to the Corporation may again be subject to grants under the Plan.
      Shares of Common Stock shall not be deemed to have been granted pursuant to
      the
      Plan (a) with respect to any portion of an Award that is settled in cash or
      (b)
      to the extent such shares are withheld in satisfaction of tax withholding
      obligations pursuant to Section 10.6. Upon payment in shares of Common Stock
      pursuant to the exercise of a Stock Appreciation Right, the number of shares
      available for grant under the Plan shall be reduced only by the number of shares
      actually issued in such payment. All provisions in this Section
      1.6
      shall be
      adjusted, as applicable, in accordance with Article
      VIII.

     

    THIS
      FIRST AMENDMENT is hereby adopted as of October 2, 2008.

    


    
      	 	
              PERCEPTRON,
                INC.

            
	 	 
	 	
              By:

            	
              /s/
                Harry T. Rittenour

            
	 	 	
              Harry
                T. Rittenour, President

              and
                Chief Executive Officer

            


    

     

    BOARD
      OF
      DIRECTORS APPROVAL: 10/02/08

    SHAREHOLDER
      APPROVAL: __/__/__
<PAGE>

                    U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission


                            Washington, D.C. 20549


                                   Form 8-K


                                CURRENT REPORT


  Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):         June 28, 1999
                                                   ---------------------------


                           Metro Global Media, Inc.
           --------------------------------------------------------
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


         Delaware                      0-21634                65-0025871
-----------------------------       -----------          ------------------
State or other jurisdiction         (Commission             (IRS Employer
    of incorporation                File Number)         Identification No.)

1060 Park Avenue, Cranston, Rhode Island                       02910
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)                    (Zip Code)


Registrant=s telephone number, including area code:        (401) 942-7876
                                                      ------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         (Former name of former address, if changed since last report)
<PAGE>

Item 4    Change in Registrant's Certifying Accountants

     On June 22, 1999, Metro Global Media, Inc.'s ("Metro") independent
     accounting firm, Grant Thornton, LLP resigned.  Since Grant Thornton's
     appointment, there have been no disagreements on any matter of accounting
     principals or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope
     or procedure.  Grant Thornton did not audit Metro's May 29, 1999 records
     nor have they issued a report on Metro's financial statements.

     Metro has furnished Grant Thornton with a copy of this disclosure and has
     requested Grant Thornton furnish it with a letter addressed to the SEC
     stating whether it agrees with the above statements.

Item 6    Resignations of Registrant's Directors

     On June 28, 1999, Dolores Guglielmi resigned from Metro's Board of
     Directors for personal reasons.  Ms. Guglielmi had no disagreements with
     Metro on any matter relating to Metro's operations, policies or practices.


                                 SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this amendment to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                                    METRO GLOBAL MEDIA, INC.


                                    By: /s/ Janet Hoey
                                        -----------------------------
                                        Janet Hoey, Treasurer


June 28, 1999
"'B ROUTING Sll~ 1 NAiii CIR '1111.1. 

I 

I 

• 

CDR· Peadeqraa• 

APPENDED DOttJMENTS CONTAlN 

CODE·WORD MATER,AL 

DD Ria 95 ~DA.A.OO:hlm!llll.14111'41.mlil'BQ I FEI 10 IJlim i-.1111tw G, wldlb lllllf liie llllill. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-23-2014 

x 

• I 

FILI I 

lllOnAllD 

llEIURll 

.. ... 
I 

\ 

i. ~ 

··I c,. ... i __ 

----- -· 

...... •. i«~·--

ott1oe or Reaearoh aA ~ 

S!l'A.~lS'l'lOAL SlllM1lf 

01oaed olit ~ ..ui: 

.· ·, .. 

B/J). Ccntraota 

. . .~ 

.Aot1ve 

J!mcsv.ted ~ ..... . Ccmo;'l.114e4 clu1Dg ~ 

. lblel" raesot:lat1• 

lllb~eota 

'1~81. 

GtlD8a1 o~ Derela----·~ ~ s,atems 

21 

9 

l 

l a ... 

Q) . 1 

..o-. 

"'° 

* 1Doluds8 ' IMOP0a . 

. ,52.1125.55' A1SAF Dl2B. 

,; 

' 

Allloat 

$19 ,54Be ,$6. "95 

• 3112,626.67 . . ...g ... 

$ ,,,,1,,,,.81 

.. 

! llU1 tar,r' 

17' 

ll? 

a 1Dolucles anmpa eatabUllJl.ed :ror 1'90ft1 tifle pm."pOSes · ' ' ' ' 

. BlH! 

SECRET· 

~ 

.. """ 

--------'--- --

' · ............. .,
NSA Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Complaints Data 

Posted Pursuant to the No Fear Act

FY15

I. Complaints of Discrimination Filed

Number of Complaints Filed 27

Number of Individuals Filing Complaints 25

Number of Individuals Filing Two or More Complaints 2

II. Bases of Complaints Filed

Age 7

Color 2

Disability 14

National Origin 1

Race 6

Religion 0

Reprisal 8

Sex 5

 1. Equal Pay Act 0

 2. Pregnancy Discrimination Act 0

Genetic Information 0

Non-EEO (sexual orientation) 0

 (status as a parent) 1

III. Issues of Complaints Filed

Assignment of Duties 2

Disciplinary Action 3

 Reprimand 1

 Suspension 0

 Removal 2

Duty Hours 1

Evaluation/Appraisal 3

Examination/Test 2

Harassment (Sexual) 0

 (Non-Sexual) 9

Promotion/Non-selection 9

Reasonable Accommodation 4

Reassignment 3

 Directed 2

 Denied 1

Terms and Conditions of Employment 2
Training 2

Other – Agency Influence on External Employer 2

IV. Average Complaints Processing Time to Completion 

All Investigations 292

 1. Hearing Not Requested 299

 2. Hearing Requested 276

Final Actions by Agency

 1. Processing Time Without a Hearing/FAD 60

 2. Processing Time With a Hearing/Final Order 85

V. Dismissals

Number of Dismissals 8

Average Days Pending At the Time of Dismissal 177

VI. Withdrawals 

Number of Complaints Withdrawn by Complainants 3

VII. Findings of Discrimination

Findings Rendered with a Hearing

Number of Findings 0

Findings Rendered without a Hearing 

Number of Findings 0

Issues of Findings of Discrimination

Number of Issues 0

Bases of Findings of Discrimination

Number of Bases 0

VIII. Pending Complaints Carried Over From Previous FYs

Complaints Open Any Length of Time During Reporting Year 83

 1. Number of Individuals Filing These Complaints 60

 2. Number of These Complaints Currently Pending 63

Status of These Cases:

 1. Investigation 13

 2. Final Agency Action 0

 3. Hearing 44

 4. Appeal 6

IX. Complaints Pending Any Length of Time This Fiscal Year Not 

Investigated Within 180 Days (plus any authorized extensions)

3
# CE2004084EN.01054901.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/549 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/549

---

(2004/C 84 E/0626)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0205/04

by Mario Borghezio (NI) to the Commission

(29 January 2004)

Subject:   Protecting SMEs against multinationals: the case of Ford dealers in Italy

Subject:

The commercial policy pursued in recent years by the company Ford Italia, centring on the ‘mopping-up’ of leading car dealers and their concentration under the direct control of figurehead companies, has created great difficulties for the old dealers, with dozens of SMEs deliberately being eliminated from the market.

Does the Commission not consider this abusive conduct of the multinational Ford in respect of its dealers to restrict the freedom to compete of SMEs operating in the automotive trade market, and therefore also to occasion prejudice to the more general interests of the consumer, by creating a situation where there is unfair competition from companies only ‘autonomous’ of the mother company in appearance?

Answer given by Mr Monti on behalf of the Commission

(15 March 2004)

(15 March 2004)

Like other suppliers, car manufacturers are generally free to distribute their products as they see fit, providing that their distribution system does not infringe Article 81 or 82 of the EC Treaty. They may therefore choose to distribute their products through their own outlets, or through car dealers that are commercially independent.

Ford currently operates a quantitative selective distribution system in Italy. Quantitative selection allows the car manufacturer to reduce the number of dealers in its network, so long as the contractual notice periods are respected. As Commission Regulation 1400/2002 (1) makes plain, such a system is permissible under Article 81 of the EC Treaty, provided that the agreements in question contain none of the serious restrictions of competition set out in Article 4 of the said regulation, and provided that the conditions set out in Articles 3 and 5 are met.

1

Ford's decision to exclude certain dealers from its network and to move towards a more vertically-integrated distribution structure is also unlikely to infringe Article 82 of the EC Treaty, since Ford can not be said to be in a dominant position on the Italian market.

As far as takeover activity is concerned, the Honourable Member should note that the dealer sector in Europe is highly fragmented, and levels of concentration are generally insufficient for the Community merger rules to be called into play.

It would therefore appear that the Commission has no grounds to take any action in respect of Ford's move to consolidate its Italian distribution network.

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1400/2002 of 31 July 2002 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor vehicle sector, OJ L 203, 1.8.2002.

1

---
TECIB: 5.3/51 

Subject: 

Reference: 

REF ID:'A57579e 

24 August 1954 

Approval of the Minutes of the Seventeenth 

Meeting of tSCIBEC. 

tSCIB S.3/50 dated 11 August 1954. 

l. No objection to the reference having been received 

by 23 August 1954, the Tentative Minutes of' the Seventeenth 

tBCIBEC Meeting are approved. 

2. It is requested that the "WOrd TEN!'ATIVE be deleted 

from the initial page of' the minutes f'or each item co:m idered 

and the "WOrd FINAL substituted therefor. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-11-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

24
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Jackpot's
Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 1996 and June 30, 1996 and its
Consolidated Statements of Income - three and six months ended 
December 31, 1996 and 1995 and is qualified in its entirety by reference 
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          43,310
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,459
<PP&E>                                          34,181
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,294
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,660
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            97
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,769
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,415
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,515
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,626
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,318
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,089
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,578
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,511
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37
        

</TABLE>
April 26, 2011 

Mr. Ronald J. Hinderberger 

ODA Lead Administrator 

The Boeing Company 

P.O. Box 3707 MC 03-52 

Seattle, WA 98124-2207 

Dear Mr. Hinderberger: 

This letter is to inform you that we have received and begun processing your petition for 

exemption. It acknowledges receipt of the petition and describes how we will process it. 

We Have the Petition 

We’ve received your March 30, 2011, petition on behalf of The Boeing Company (Boeing) 

for an exemption from §§ 91.609(c)(1) and (i)(3) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR). This exemption, if granted, would allow Boeing to operate certain model 737, 767 

and 777 airplanes that do not meet the requirements of § 91.609(c)(1). It would also allow 

Boeing to conduct unique flights associated with the production and sale of new Boeing 

airplanes with cockpit voice recorders and flight data recorders that do not meet the 

requirements of § 91.609. 

We’ve added your petition to the public docket (No. FAA-2011-0342) and we are processing 

it. We will contact you if we need additional information. 

How We’ll Process the Petition 

A petition for an exemption, according to 14 CFR 11.63(d), must be sent to the FAA at least 

120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. In addition, we publish a 

summary of the petition in the Federal Register for public comment unless, according to 

14 CFR 11.87, we determine that good cause exists for not publishing it. 
2 

We will advise you of the agency's final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions in the meantime, you may contact me at (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Frances Shaver 

Program Analyst 

 Aircraft and Airport Rules Division
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
reports (and to all references to our Firm) included in or made a part of this
registration statement.

                                                 /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
November 17, 1999