alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004084EN.01093001.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/930 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/930

---

(2004/C 84 E/1028)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1024/04

by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(5 April 2004)

Subject:   Olympic Airways

Subject:

The Greek press has reported that, in the next few days, the Commission will bring an action against Greece before the European Court of Justice for providing unlawful State subsidies to Olympic Airways (OA). According to the reports, there are reasons to suppose that illegal subsidies were paid during the process of dividing OA into two and the attempt to privatise Olympic Airlines as well as during the process of collecting and allocating the passenger levy for the construction of the new airport at Spata.

In its answer to my question (E-2837/03 (1)) concerning the safeguarding of OA workers' rights following the creation of the new company Olympic Airlines', the Commission stated that it would investigate the matter and inform us of its findings.

1

In the light of the foregoing, can the Commission elaborate on its legal arguments pertaining to unlawful subsidies? What are the findings (answer to question E-2837/03) of the investigation into the safeguarding of the rights of the workers being transferred to the new company and those remaining with the old company, in accordance with Articles 3 and 4 of Directive 98/50/EC (2)?

2

Answer given by Mr Dimas on behalf of the Commission

(27 April 2004)

(27 April 2004)

The Honourable Member is asked to refer to the supplementary answer given by the Commission to his written question E-2837/03 (3).

3

---

(1)  OJ C 58 E, 6.3.2004, p. 206.

1

(2)  OJ L 201, 17.7.1998, p. 88.

2

(3)  OJ C 58 E, 6.3.2004.

3

---
• 

USCIB: 4.2/54 

S August 1955 

Ml!MORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIBEC: 

Subject: Periodic Review of Annex A to CIBD #7. 

Reference: CIBD #7 dated 12 May 1955. 

1. The enclosed report by the Chairman of the USCIB Security 

Committee recommends certain reV'isions to Annex A of the reference in 

order that Annex A may more accurately reflect the existing world 

situation. 

2. It is requested that the members execute the attached vote 

sheet and return it to this office by the close of business 17 August 

1955. 

Enclosure 

a/s 

USCIB: 4.2/54 

USCIB 

COf\lfltDE1\'TIAL 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 08-18-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

r' ~ 

..... ·f 
.. . " • 

SEC# 010 

8 August 1955 

00NF IBEffi'IAJ:i 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE ACTING EXECUTIVE SECREI'ARY, USCIB: 

Subject: Periodic Review of Annex A to CIBD #7. 

R~ference: CIBD #7 dated 12 May 1955. 

1. On 4 August 1955, the Security Committee again reviewed the list 

of specific areas involving substantial risk to COMINT knowledgeable 

individuals (Annex A to the reference) in order to determine its current 

adequacy. 

2. The SECCOM noted that recent ratification of the Austrian State 

Treaty has nullified the listed restrictions in regard to city of Vienna 

and to Austria as a whole. 

3. The SECCOM unanimously agreed that subject list is in need of 

revision only in regard to Austria and recommends that pertinent restrictions be amended as follows: 

Paragraph lb(3) - Change to read 11That section of Vienna 

f o:rmerly known as the Soviet Sector" 

Paragraph lb(4) - Change to read "That section of Austria 

formerly known as the Soviet Zone" 

Paragraph 2b - Change to read 11Those sections of Vienna 

formerly known as the U.S., British, 

French and International Sectors". 

4. The Security Committee will again review subject list at their 

next regular meeting, tentatively scheduled for l September 1955. 

Enclosure with USCIB 4.2/54 dtd 8 Aug 1955. 

-CONPtDENTIAL 

WILLIAM R. CUIMER 

Major, Arty., USA 

Chairman, SECCOM
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 39 (Friday, February 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 10745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04132]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9049]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition: 
Determinations: ``From Bauhaus to Buenos Aires: Grete Stern and Horacio 
Coppola''

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 4, 2014, notice was published on pages 45228 of the 
Federal Register (volume 79, number 149) of determinations made by the 
Department of State pertaining to the exhibition ``From Bauhaus to 
Buenos Aires: Grete Stern and Horacio Coppola.'' The referenced notice 
is corrected here to include additional objects as part of the 
exhibition. Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the additional objects 
to be included in the exhibition ``From Bauhaus to Buenos Aires: Grete 
Stern and Horacio Coppola,'' imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
additional objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the 
foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or 
display of the additional objects at The Museum of Modern Art, New 
York, NY, from on or about May 17, 2015, until on or about October 4, 
2015, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: February 19, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-04132 Filed 2-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6988
MICHAEL WILLIAM LEARY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SEWALL B. SMITH; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA96-2622-DKC) Submitted: November 12, 1997 Decided: November 26, 1997 Before HALL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael William Leary, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Leary v. Smith , No. CA-96-2622-DKC (D. Md. July 2, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
REF ID:A275510 

(Basic ltra OCSigO file SIGE0-5, Subja Request for Information, dtd 

27 Jan 58} 

1st Ind 

National Security Agency, Washington 25, D. c. 

Serials PAT-017 

10 April 1958 

TOa Chief Signal Officer, Department of the Army, The Pentagon 

Washington 25, D. c., Attna Security Control Officer 

1. A second copy of Mr. Friedman's letter of 17nDecember 1957, 

referred to in paragraph 1 of the basic letter, and a similar inquiry 

relative to publication of certain documents were received from u.s. 

Army Security Agency, and the views of the Agency furnished in response 

thereto. 

2. It is understood that a substantive reply has been forwarded 

by USASA to Assistant Chief of Staff, Intelligence, Department of the 

Army, and thus may be expected to reach you through Department of Army 

channels. 

FOO nlE DIRECTB9 OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT& 

Inc la 

w/d 

CCI AG Reading File 

DOC (Mr. Ingalls} R/h (Mr. Barlow} 

Mr. Stauffer (WARD) 

HENRY B. STAUFFER 

NSA Patent Attorney 

M/R1 Self•-explanatory. Additional extensions were requested for suspense 

and coordinated with Mr. Dalton (ext 73735) in order to obtain needed 

information for final reply. 

ADDED M/Ra Rewritten by AG-103 to include cy of NSA Serial S 268 to USASA 

for OCSIGO 

ADDED 14/Ra Rewritten after conversations with AG 103. Information in para 2 

was obtained based on a telephone call with GAS 23. 

@'pp roved for Release bv NSA on 05-16-2014 pursuant to E .0. 1352\3 

--~----------=-==---=---==------===--=-----
F-= 

Dr. Revild P. 011.ver 

Department of Classics 

University or Illinois 

Lincoln Hall 

Urbana, Illinois 

Dear Dr. Oliver: 

';!<_ ' 

I was very much pleased to hoar from you and ~ receive 

the intormation your letter contains. I am going to try to 

get a nlicrotil.m or the two manuscripts you mention, probably 

through the intermediary or the Library of Congress. I think 

we shouJ.d have copies in our library .. 

W:1 th most cordial greetings, I am, 

Sincerely, 

WILLIAM F. FRIEDMAN 

Consultant 

Copy furnished: OOT W.F .Friedman/eby/23 June 52 

Consultant 

MEMO FOR RECORD: This is a reply to Mr. Oliver's ltr of 11 June .52 

to Mr. Friedman giving deaails on two manuscripts 

Mr. Friedman is interested in obtaining for the 

AFSA Lib~:r:_ary. 

~ .. • ..... : '·,.""t~r- ~·-

-.r ,r -- 0 - T 

..- .. -~ -

roved for Release b NSA on 06-13 2014 ursuantto E .0. 1352
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009
(the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: March 31, 2010
    /s/ Gary  S. WechslerGary S. WechslerTreasurer and
Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES–OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Retrospettiva, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10–KSBfor the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Borivoje Vukadinovic, Chief ExecutiveOfficer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the SARBANES–OXLEY Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operation of the Company.

 
| Date:  |      April 11  , 2008              |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                             |   |
| By:    |   /s/      Borivoje Vukadinovic    |   |
|   |   Borivoje  Vukadinovic                                |   |
|   |   Chief  Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
# CE2004078EN.01055401.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/554 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/554

---

(2004/C 78 E/0589)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3457/03

by Ilda Figueiredo (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(20 November 2003)

Subject:   Reform of the olive oil sector

Subject:

Commission Communication (1) on ‘accomplishing a sustainable agricultural model for Europe through the reformed CAP — the tobacco, olive oil, cotton and sugar sectors’, it states that ‘for simplification, the olive grove payment will not be allocated before EUR 50 per aid claim’.

1

Various interpretations have been placed on this formulation. Would the Commission therefore please clarify whether this means that all olive growers currently receiving less than EUR 50 will henceforth receive EUR 50, or on the contrary, cease to receive any aid whatever, which would be very unfair?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(22 December 2003)

(22 December 2003)

The Commission's communication Accomplishing a sustainable agricultural model for Europe through the reformed CAP- the tobacco, olive oil and sugar sectors (2) was followed on 18 November by its adoption of the proposals for the legislation introducing the reforms in question.

2

The particular provision to which the Honourable Member refers has to be seen in context: simplification of the aid provisions for a sector with a very large number of recipients (more than 2 100 000 in the Community), most of whom receive very small amounts of aid. This simplification is designed not to harm the interests of the smallest producers.

A second provision has to be taken into account in this connection. Growers with an area of less than 0,3 geographical information system (GIS) hectares will be entitled, irrespective of the amount of aid received, to convert into single payment entitlement the average aid received during the reference period whereas for producers with more than 0,3 GIS hectares the conversion level proposed is 60 %. The first provision in turn makes operation of the system less burdensome by specifying that if the amount of olive grove aid claimed is less than EUR 50 it will not be paid. For the purposes of this provision the actual size of the grove is irrelevant.

Thus under the new system proposed the very small producers will receive at least the average amount granted during the reference period. Those whose grove is considered by the Member State to have an environmental or social value will also be able to receive the olive grove aid provided that the amount actually falling to be received is more than EUR 50.

---

(1)  COM(2003) 554 final.

1

(2)  COM(2003) 554 final.

2

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intermagnetics General Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending February 26, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael K. Burke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael K. Burke*
---------------------
Michael K. Burke
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
April 7, 2006

* These certifications are being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed
"filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to
the liability of that Section. These certifications shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.
99-378.

#### Coletta v. Yang.

Montgomery App. No. 17289.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
# CE2004084EN.01035801.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/358 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/358

---

(2004/C 84 E/0416)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0308/04

by Esko Seppänen (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(6 February 2004)

Subject:   The French language at the Commission

Subject:

If my information is correct, the Commission intends to spend more than EUR 20 million on French courses for its employees. On what basis does the Commission train its staff specifically to improve their command of French, and does it intend to promote the position of French at the expense of other languages within the Commission?

Answer given by Mr Kinnock on behalf of the Commission

(24 March 2004)

(24 March 2004)

The Honourable Member's information is not correct, and neither are the similar figures that have recently appeared in some newspapers, together with misleading reports about French as a working language of the Commission.

The Commission has not taken any decision which gives or will give the teaching of French a privileged place by comparison with that of the other official languages.

Courses for each language for each year are planned on the basis of the previous year's take up. Apart from demand from staff seeking to improve language skills the only other factor taken into account is the budget limit set for language training. For 2003 this was EUR 5 000 000. French courses accounted for 23 % of the total in 2003, English for 20 %, Spanish for 10 %, German for 10 % and the remaining 37 % was used for courses in 28 other languages.

For some languages demand does not noticeably vary. For others, principally English, French and the languages of the acceding countries, there has been an average increase in demand of about 10 % a year since 2001. This trend will probably strengthen from 2004 following enlargement and entry into force of the new Staff Regulations which give increased importance to multilingualism, particularly by requiring officials to attain the ability to work in a third Community language before a first promotion can be secured.

It should be noted that the priority given to a staff member's language training provided or financed by the Commission depends, and will continue to depend, on the requirements of the job that he or she does (1).

1

Clearly, it is not possible to estimate precisely which languages will be most in demand in the immediate future. The Commission assures the Honourable Member that it will continue to be committed to providing its staff with accessible opportunities for learning or developing their capabilities in all the official languages.

---

(1)  Commission Decision on staff training C(2002) 1577 of 7 May 2002.

1

---
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

50) IV-C-16 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:53 AM Sheet 50 of 232 
P.2 

/r-80^__ 

HZ -C-K, 

JAN -4 1988 

Honorable Robert C. Byrd 

Onite<3 States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

Dear Senator Byrdt 

This Is in response to your December 11, 1987 letter 

relaying your concerns and the concerns of your constituents 

regardinq EPA's regulatory proposed to require onboard 

canisters on ne*» vehicles to control refueling emissions. To 

assist you with your responses, I have enclosed a copy of our 

proposal for your review. Section B (pages 31177-31182) 

explains EPA's overall rationale for proposing onboard 

controls. If you woultf like further details of our analysis, 

please contact Mr. Philip Carlson of the Standards Development 

and Support Branch of the Emission Control Technology Division, 

25*5 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI 481C5 (7TS 374-8270 or 

Commercial (313) 668-4270). 

Thank you for your letter. w«£ will place the letters from 

the Ford dealerships in our public docket and fully consider 

their conaents in the next phase of our rulemaking process. 

Sincerely yours, 

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY 

RICHARD D. WILSON 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

Enclosure 

cc: Docket A-87-11 

SDSB:Carlson:Dillingham:2565Ply*iouth Rd. :X270:12/22/87:ID*5556W 

Last reviewed by Chet France for Charles Grav:12/22/87 

AL 704381 
P.3 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

ARFWOY 

., J. D liLj 0 

CENT:V.!. DOCKET
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

# Year in Review

HomeCybersecurityYear in Review

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Document Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Full Size (0.36 MB)

Tags:NSA Historical Photographs, HIST-002-005

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery