alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6109** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. PABLO RIVERA

- MARTINEZ , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville
. Timothy M. Cain , District Judge. ( 6:13

- cr - 00014

- TMC

- 1; 6:13

- CV

- 03340

- TMC )

Submitted : May 20, 2014 Decided: June 10, 2014

Before KING, FLOYD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Pablo Rivera

- Martinez, Appellant Pro Se. Maxwell B. Cauthen, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Pablo Rivera

- Martinez seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appe alability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable juris ts would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedura l grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rivera

- Martinez has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate rials3 before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-3 No. 333-25787, No. 333-106555,
No. 333-113847, No. 333-115991 and No. 130834) and the related Prospectuses and in the Registration Statements (Form S-8
No. 33-85252, No. 333-115855, No. 333-115856 and No. 333-115857) and the related Prospectuses of LTC Properties, Inc.
of our reports dated February 22, 2006 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of LTC Properties, Inc., LTC Properties, Inc. management's assessment of
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of LTC Properties, Inc., included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

|                                          |  | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
|----------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|Los Angeles, California
February 22, 2006 |  |                      

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      11,597,540
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               40,856,772
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  9,928,789
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            76,204,417
<PP&E>                                     347,617,262
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             443,928,134
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       56,922,519
<BONDS>                                    145,016,269
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        8,829,844
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,611
<OTHER-SE>                                  69,453,374
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               443,928,134
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           125,372,323
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              104,104,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          16,286,891
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,238,745
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (786,979)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,025,723
<DISCONTINUED>                               3,895,512
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,921,236
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43


</TABLE>
Intelligence Satellite Photos Released 

24 April 96

More than 300,000 satellite photographs collected by the U.S. intelligence community 

between 1960 and 1972 are now available from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). You 

can use the Internet to browse the entire collection on the World Wide Web (URL: 

http://edcwww.cr.usgs.gov/dclass/dclass.html), or stop by a USGS Earth Science 

Information Center to get a first-hand view.

This collection adds more than a decade worth of records to the Landsat collection that has been 

available for civilian use since July 1972. Compare these images from the 1960's with today's 

images to see how our built environment and our natural systems such as lakes, rivers and 

streams, forests, grasslands, and other land cover have changed. Look at not only the United 

States but also much of the world.

Declassification of these photo reconnaissance missions was authorized by an Executive Order, 

signed by President Clinton on February 23, 1995. The entire collection of more than 800,000 

declassified photos is slated to incrementally reach USGS archives by the end of the summer of 

1996.

For example, center-pivot irrigation systems (identifiable by the large circles) have more than 

tripled in the region near Hastings, Nebraska, since November 1968. The expanded use of 

irrigation is of interest to resource managers concerned with increased draws on the underlying 

Ogallala aquifer.

For example, in the Cape Canaveral, Florida, image pair, the Landsat MSS image (acquired 

March 1992) shows how agricultural use of a marshy region near Cape Canaveral has expanded 

since the declassified image was acquired (Mission 9059A, October 30, 1963). In the older 

declassified image the region is dissected by ponds and small stream channels. In the Landsat 

image, acquired more than 28 years later, many of the small streams have been modified by 

dams and reservoirs, a network of roads has been constructed in the area, and agricultural 

development has increased.

An online catalog and image browse capability for the photo collection is accessible, at no 

charge, on the Internet through the U.S. Geological Survey's Global Land Information System 

(GLIS). For more information about Declassified Intelligence Satellite Photographs (DISP) and 

how to use the online GLIS catalog for data searching, refer to the World Wide Web DISP user 

guide at: URL: http://edcwww.cr.usgs.gov/glis/hyper/guide/disp

For information on ordering Declassified Intelligence Satellite Photographs, contact any Earth 

Science Information Center or call 1-800-USA-MAPS. The cost of each photograph typically 

ranges from $12 to $24 plus $3.50 handling on each order.

For Technical information on Declassified Intelligence Satellite Photographs contact:
U.S. Geological Survey

EROS Data Center

Customer Services

Sioux Falls, SD 57198

605-594-6151; Fax 605-594-6589

E-mail: custserv@edcmail.cr.usgs.gov
NSA Rmtr.L.ATION 

NUMBER 10-14 

REF ID:A579"i 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGErfCY 

Washington 25, D. C. 

Jl December 1954 

EFFECTIVE UMTIL l JANUARY 1956 l'NLESS SOONER 

RESCINDED· OR SUPERSEDED 

ESTABLISHMENT OF A TECHNICAL JOURNAL 

SECTION 

PURFOSE • • • • • • • • • • • • I 

EDITORIAL DlRNCTION • • • • • • II 

SUPERVISION • • • • • • • • • • III 

SECTION I - PURPOSE 

In the interests of aiding the growth of all NSA technicians 

in knowledge of' their subjects, skill in the techniques ot their 

crafts, and understanding of the broad nature of the cryptologic 

:fl.tnction, a technical journal is established in the Ageney. 

SECTION II - EDITORIAL DIRECTION 

l. The NSA Tecllnical Journal Editorial Policy Doard will 

be established a-:id. membership announce'i by General Ord'!rs. 

2. The boa.rd. will consist of a chairman and one representative 

from each of the following: PROD, COMSEC, R/D, AG, TEC, TNG and P/P. 

3. The Editorial Policy Board will: 

a. Establish initial policy with respect to classi:f'1· 

cation, distribution, f'o1-ma.t and scope of' material to be published, 

and such other matters as require determination. 

b. Publish policy stat~ments for guidance of the Managing Editor and the several elements of the Agency. 

c. Review issues of tho Journal and operating procedures 

of the Editorial Staff for conformance to policy. 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 08-13-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
NSA RmULATIOif 

NUMBER 10-14 

REF ID:A5797. 

SEDTION III .. SUPERVISION 

31 December 195~ 

Supervision for the implementation of the policy established 

herein is the responsibility of the Chief, Technical Inf'ormation 

Division. 

BY CCJ.llJAND OF LIJ!D'.l'ENANT GENERAL CANINE: 

OFFICIAL: 

64~ E. M. GIBSON 

Lt. Colonel, AGC 

Acting Adjutant General 

DISTRIBUTION III 

L. H. FROST 

Rear Admiral, u. s. Navy 

Chief' ot Staff' 

- 2 -
' ' ( ( I t/J_..f .A' ~j s . : 1 ~ - ~ - t~ c. -ttF~·(b§~-1i~_q --- .._,...., .... Q,~-,.,... I 

SECRET COWFID.:!:NTIA.L RESTRICTED 

TO DATE FROM -------

Commanding Officer ---Aasistant Commanda_n_t _____ _ 

Dir of Comm Research ---- -------- Control 0 ----Fiscal 0 ------------- ---

__ _Adm in is tr -----------=--- at iv e 0. ;.....;_. --------- Post Adjutant ---------- Int e 11 i gen c e 0 --------:-- Fr' o v o st Marsha1 

2nd Sig Serv Bn --------

-------- . Chi'ef, Pers & Tng Div -:......:~ ------ Chief, Pers Br 

Chief,, Tng Br ---------- o/c Officer P~e-r_s_S_e_c ____ _ 

Chief, Oper Serv Div ---- -------- Chief, Communications Br ---- Chief, Laboratory Br ------ Chief, Machine Br -------- Chief, Supply Br- o/c, SSA Mail Un_i_t ____ _ 

___ Chief, Secur.ity Div _____ __ 

Chief, Protective Sec Br --- Chief, Cryptographic Br 

Chief, Developme'nt Br ---

----- Chief, Intelligence Jiv ---- -----

---

Ch i~f, Language Br 

Chief, Mil Cryptanalytic ------- Br 

Chief, Gen Cryptanalytic Br 

Chief, T/A and Contra 1 Br 

Chief, I & L Br --------

As discussed 

As requested --------- Cor.i.ments and_r_e_t_u_r_n ____ _ 

Information and file -.;.,...,--- 1 n for-mat ion and forwarding 

' Informaticn and return --

Reco~mnenda ti on -------- See no~e on r~yerse ----- Sfgrrature if approvedYour·action ---- -----------

pp roved for Release by NSA on 12-18-2014 

ursuant to E.O. 13526 

~ SIS S,C Form No. 96 Ill 16 Nov 44 

(Rev) 
.... ·-~· ~ 

.·dU··· 

.• -

1 .. f~~c· · 

J r.l· ., V. . _·. 

(!)J--),/ .. 

. . . 

I . - ....... • •• 

·- -.... ·-·· . 

... 

.. ~ ..... . 

. ' .. . . ~ . -'~ 

. _.,,.- ' 

.. 

. .. .. .. . . . 

; . ·: -~---·=-=:··:. 

. .... •..... . . . 

-·~ !.- .. _ . ~
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                              Thirteen Weeks Ended         
                                       September 26,        September 27,     
                                           1997                 1996        
                                     (000's omitted, except per share data)

<S>                                    <C>                  <C>                 
Primary:

Weighted average shares outstanding        9,139                9,608

Net effect of dilutive stock
 options-based on the
 treasury stock method using
 average market price                        120                  195
                                       ----------           ----------          
Total                                      9,259                9,803           


Income from continuing operations      $   1,881            $   1,533           
Loss from discontinued operations              0                 (774)
                                       ----------           ----------          
Net income                             $   1,881            $     759          
                                       ----------           ----------          

Net income (loss) per share
  Continuing operations                $    0.20            $    0.16           
  Discontinued operations                   0.00                (0.08)
                                       ----------           ----------
Net income per share                   $    0.20            $    0.08           
                                       ----------           ----------


Fully Diluted:

Weighted average shares outstanding        9,139                9,608           

Net effect of dilutive stock
 options-based on the
 treasury stock method using
 the greater of the average
 market price or the period end
 market price                                160                  204
                                       ----------           ----------
Total                                      9,299                9,812           

Income from continuing operations      $   1,881            $   1,533           
Loss from discontinued operations              0                 (774)
                                       ----------           ----------          
Net income                             $   1,881            $     759
                                       ----------           ----------                    

Net income (loss) per share
  Continuing operations                $    0.20            $    0.16           
  Discontinued operations                   0.00                (0.08)
                                       ----------           ----------
Net income per share                   $    0.20            $    0.08           
                                       ----------           ----------

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement of Organogenesis Inc. (the Company) on this Form S-3 of our report,
dated March 30, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of
Organogenesis Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 1998 which report is included in the
Company's Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on March 31, 1999.  We also consent to the reference to our Firm under the
caption "Experts."

     We also consent to the reference to our Firm in the Registration Statement
under the caption "Experts."


                                    /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

                                    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
May 14, 1999
USCIB: JJ.2/44 

17 November 1954 

SS0R:Ei'l 

:MEMORANDUM.FCR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Clearance and Indoctrination ror Category III C(J([NT 

(Sta.ff Members of the Clark Co.rrmittee). 

USCIB ]3.2/43 dated 16 November 1954• 

1. All USCIB Members have indicated, by telephone, their approval 

of the proposal contained in the reference. 

2. The OSD Member accompanied his vote of approval with a request 

that every effort be made to insure that additional indoctrinations 

will not be required at such time as investigations of other CCIUNT 

organizations (e.g., NSA) are conducted. 

3. The CIA Member has been notified inf'or.ma.lly of the above 

decision. 

USCIB 

USCIB: 13.2/44 

SECRET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-27-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

24
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)
       OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Interactive Data
Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Steven G. Crane, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: March 14, 2006                             /s/ Steven G. Crane
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Steven G. Crane
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  (principal accounting officer)
Doc ID: 3701368
Doc ID: 3701368
Doc ID: 3701368
Doc ID: 3701368
Doc ID: 3701368
Doc ID: 3701368
Doc ID: 3701368
Doc ID: 3701368
Doc ID: 3701368
Doc ID: 3701368
Doc ID: 3701368
Doc ID: 3701368
Doc ID: 3701368
Doc ID: 3701368
Doc ID: 3701368
Doc ID: 3701368
Doc ID: 3701368
Doc ID: 3701368
Doc ID: 3701368
#### Tio, Appellant, vs. Brown and others, Respondents.

*April 10*—

April *30, 1907.*

*Judgment:*Res judicata: *Yoid mortgage.*

A judgment, in an action to foreclose a mortgage, declaring the mortgage void because it wholly failed to describe any land, is *res judicata*in a subsequent action to reform and foreclose the same mortgage, brought against the same defendants by a transferee of the former plaintiff.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Pierce county: E. W. Helms, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of W. C. Owen, and for the respondents *George*W. *Brown*and *Augusta Brown*on that of *B. B. Kinney.*

Winslow;, J.

This is an action to reform and foreclose a mortgage executed by the defendants *George W. Brown*and *Joseph L. Schallaire to the*plaintiff March 1, 1895. The de*574scription of tbe mortgaged premises contained in tbe mortgage was so indefinite and uncertain that it in fact described no property, and tbe complaint charged that this was tbe result of mistake by tbe scrivener, and it was sought to reform tbe mortgage by inserting a description of certain lands which it was claimed were intended to be mortgaged. It appeared upon tbe trial and was found by tbe court that in March, 1899, tbe plaintiff sold and assigned tbe mortgage in question to one Caroline Jessup, and that she thereafter brought an action to foreclose tbe same against tbe respondents *Brown*and others, in which action judgment was rendered declaring tbe mortgage void because it wholly failed to describe any real estate. *It*was further found that after rendition of this judgment Caroline Jessup sold and transferred tbe note and mortgage back to tbe plaintiff.

Thus it appears that in an action upon this same cause of action, brought by tbe plaintiff’s grantor against tbe same defendants, a court of competent jurisdiction has held tbe mortgage in question void and incapable of enforcement. Whether tbe decision was right or wrong it is *res adjudícala*in another action between tbe same parties or their privies upon tbe same cause of action as to all matters which were litigated or might have been litigated in tbe former action. *Grunert v. Spald*ing, 104 Wis. 193, 80 N. W. 589.

Tbe court also found that there was no sufficient proof to show what particular premises were attempted to be mortgaged, and hence that there could be no reformation. As the former judgment is conclusive between the.parties, we do not find it necessary to discuss the question whether the court was right on the last-mentioned proposition, although from our examination of the record we see no reason to doubt the correctness of the conclusion reached.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1711 

To provide for a temporary safe harbor from the enforcement of integrated 

disclosure requirements for mortgage loan transactions under the Real 

Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 and the Truth in Lending 

Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 7, 2015 

Mr. SCOTT (for himself, Mr. DONNELLY, Mr. CRAPO, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. 

HELLER, Mr. KING, Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. DAINES, Ms. AYOTTE, Mr. ROBERTS, and Mr. ISAKSON) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban 

Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for a temporary safe harbor from the enforcement 

of integrated disclosure requirements for mortgage loan 

transactions under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 and the Truth in Lending Act, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ENFORCEMENT SAFE HARBOR. 

4 The integrated disclosure requirements for mortgage 

5 loan transactions under section 4(a) of the Real Estate 

6 Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 (12 U.S.C. 2603(a)), 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1711 IS

1 section 105(b) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 

2 1604(b)), and regulations issued under such sections may 

3 not be enforced against any person until January 1, 2016, 

4 and no suit may be filed against any person for a violation 

5 of such requirements occurring before such date, so long 

6 as such person has made a good faith effort to comply 

7 with such requirements. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4918

_____________________________

VIDA VONGSAY,

Appellant,

v.

MARK ANTHONY DRURY,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County.

Steven Fahlgren, Judge.

June 26, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, BILBREY, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Michael L. Duncan, Duncan Trial & Family Law, Jacksonville, for 

Appellant.

Matthew L. Rhodes, Callahan, for Appellee.