alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Lancer Insurance Company, Respondent, v Arthur Nechamkus et al., Respondents, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellant.

[774 NYS2d 63]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Martin, J.), dated January 2, 2003, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On April 2, 1999, a vehicle owned and operated by Arthur *600Nechamkus was involved in a multi-vehicle rear-end collision on Bruckner Boulevard in the Bronx. Mr. Nechamkus, two passengers in his vehicle, Sally Green and Dolores Shapiro, and the operators of the other vehicles, Hurbert Pullam and Yun Ming Lin, allegedly were injured.

On or about March 19, 2002, Mr. Nechamkus and his wife, Barbara Nechamkus, commenced an action to recover damages for personal injuries against Yun Ming Lin and Qui Ping Chen, the owner of the vehicle operated by Yun Ming Lin, alleging that Yun Ming Lin’s negligence proximately caused the accident. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, which insured the alleged tortfeasors’ vehicle, subsequently advised the attorney for Mr. and Mrs. Nechamkus that the $50,000 per accident limit of the alleged tortfeasors’ automobile liability policy was previously exhausted in satisfaction of claims filed in 1999 by Pullam, Green, and Shapiro. On or about August 1, 2002, Mr. Nechamkus filed a demand for uninsured motorist arbitration with his commercial automobile liability carrier, the petitioner, Lancer Insurance Company, asserting that the alleged tortfeasors’ vehicle was, in effect, uninsured *(see*Insurance Law § 3420 [f] [2]). The Supreme Court rejected that argument and permanently stayed the arbitration.

“[W]here, as here, an insurer has paid the full monetary limits set forth in. the policy, its duties under the contract of insurance cease *(see, Champagne v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.,*185 AD2d 835, 837 [1992])” *(Presbyterian Hosp. in City of N.Y. v General Acc. Ins. Co. of Am.,*229 AD2d 479, 480 [1996]). Moreover, the exhaustion of the alleged tortfeasors’ policy limits in satisfaction of prior claims did not render that vehicle uninsured for purposes of the uninsured motorist endorsement of Mr. Nechamkus’s policy with the petitioner *(see Matter of Harley v CNA Ins. Co.,*212 AD2d 614 [1995]). S. Miller, J.P., Luciano, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.
# Support Documents for

Significant New Use Rule (SNUR s ) on

Premanufacture Notice s (PMN s)

P-06- 623 and P-06-624

EPA Docket EPA

- HQ

- OPPT -2011-0577

# Index

A-001 Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report for

PMN s P-06- 623 and P-06-624

A-002 Initial Review Engineering Report for

PMN s P-06-6 23 and P-06-624

A-003 Initial Re view Exposure Report for

PMNs P-06- 623 and P-06-624

# A-001

Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report

for PMN s P-06- 623 and P-06- 624

# A-002

Initial Review Engineering Report

for PMN s P-06- 623 and P-06- 624

# A-003

Initial Revi ew Exposure Report

for PMN s P-06- 623 and P-06- 624
INITIALS 

DATE 

4 

REMARKS 

CIRCULATE 

COORDINATION 

FILE 

INFORMATION 

NECESSARY 

ACTION 

NOTE !\ND 

RE:TURN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-14-2014 

ursuant to E.O. 13526 

FROM NAME OR TlnE .:::::\-A A Cl :. • • ~ • • . Dl\TE fr\ I 

1~~~~~~~~'--~~~~~~~'1~r-0 

ORGl\NlZATl<'N AND LOCATION~ TELEPHONE 

NM E FORM NO 9 5 Replace:, DA AGO Form 895, I OCT 48 1 Apr 48, which may bo usod, c0-16-48487-3 GIPO 
REF ID :Ajt849 

,.,. 
STANDARO FORM NO. 64 e e 

Office Memorandum • UNITED sTATEs GovERNMENT 

ro , OJA 4i<_ DAT•· lftH/-/"'° 

FROM I (JJ If'~ 
• 

69~FIBENTIAL 

e REF ID:A65849 

eemrn1EM'IAL 

From: 

To 

Via 

AFSA-34 

AFSA-OOT c:t.. 

AFSA-03 --~ . U\ 

12 October 1950 

1. It is suggested that AFSA attempt to secure the services of John von 

Ne'\llila.IlJl. as a consultant on cryptology. 

2. John von Neumann is a professor at the Institute for Advanced. Study 

and is recognized as one of the world 1 s greatest minds by all mathematicians and physicists. Not only is he a brilliant researcher in mathematics and theoretical physics but also a great 11 idea man11 • He has done 

important research in the subjects of statistics, linear operator theory 

(matrices) and logic and founded the mathematical theory of strategy (game 

theory). He is easily the worldl.s foremost authority on the logical design and program theory of computing machines. All of these subjects have 

a direct application to the operations of AFSA. 

3. We anticipate no difficulty in clearing von Neumann. Because of his , extraordinary talents his services are continually used by numerous defence 

projects, some of them highly confidential. During the war and since he 

has been one of the top theoreticians on the A-bomb project; he is, of 

course, ~-cleared. He also consults for the National Advisory Committee 

for Aeronautics and the Aberdeen proving grounds. He is the head of a 

computing machine project at Princeton which is supported by the Army. 

4. If it is decided. to approach von Neumann, his clearance shouJ.d be 

completely settled before any overture is made. We must then secure his 

interest in our problems and convince him that, if he works with us, he 

will have suf'ficient scope to justify the use of his time; otherwise, he 

might very well decline to assist us in view of his many other commitments. 

To do this we must be prepared to introduce him to the heart of our most 

difficult problems and ex.plain the exact status of our work at the first 

consultation. 

5. It is the opinion of all the mathematicians in AFSA-34 that von Neumann 

can make substantial. contributions to the work of AFSA. 

H. Campaigne 

EOt!FIDENTIAL 

OONPIM!ffI:1lL 
NEVER -OR APPROVALS, DISAPPROVALS, 

CONC~NCr:;s, OR SIMILAR ACTIONS 

I NAME OR TITLE 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION 

2 

3 

FROM NAME OR TITLE 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION 

DD FORM 95 RcplacesDAAGOForm8g5,1Apr48,an<l.AFRQ I FEB 50 Form 12, 10 Nov 47, which may be used. 

RDINATION 

INFORMATION 

NECESSARY ACTION 

NOTE AND 

RETURN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

'
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-41172 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CARLOS PONTI RHODES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. G-99-CR-23-ALL

-------------------- August 22, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Assistant Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos Ponti Rhodes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rhodes has received copies of counsel’s motion and brief but did not file a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1753 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1753

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify and permanently 
    extend qualified zone academy bonds, and to treat such bonds as 
                      specified tax credit bonds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 13, 2015

   Mr. Brown introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify and permanently 
    extend qualified zone academy bonds, and to treat such bonds as 
                      specified tax credit bonds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rebuilding America's Schools Act''.

SEC. 2. ENHANCEMENT OF QUALIFIED ZONE ACADEMY BONDS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 54E(c) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``and $400,000,000 for 
2011'' and all that follows through the period and inserting the 
following: ``$400,000,000 for 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014, and 
$1,400,000,000 for each calendar year after 2014.''.
    (b) Construction of a Public School Facility.--Subparagraph (A) of 
section 54E(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by 
striking ``rehabilitating or repairing'' and inserting ``constructing, 
rehabilitating, or repairing''.
    (c) Adjustment of Private Business Contribution Requirement.--
Subsection (b) of section 54E of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by striking ``10 percent'' and inserting ``5 percent''.
    (d) Specified Tax Credit Bond.--Clause (iii) of section 
6431(f)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read 
as follows:
                            ``(iii) a qualified zone academy bond (as 
                        defined in section 54E), or''.
    (e) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to obligations issued after December 31, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
' . I 

~ 

h 

• REF ID:A66086 • Ter SEGF<ET' 

EXTRACTS FROM SCAG REPORT 

dated 12 Jt.arch 1952 

(3) A Senior Civilian Technical Director should be appointed, reporting 

directly to the Director of AJ'SA. 

(4) A separate research organization should be established, headed by a 

Director of Research. The Director of Research should report in parallel with 

the haads of Development and Operations to the Technical Dit'ector. If proposal 

(3) is adopted, he tiouJd report directly to the Senior Civilian Technical 

Director. 

It is SCAG' s firltl opinion that a strong ·oasic research program is of great 

importance in supporting the developnent arrl operation work of AFSA and. that a 

separate basic research organization should be set up. Research should be kept 

separate from development and operations with personnel and facility assignments 

which cannot be infringed upon by development and operation requirements. The 

experience of members of SCAG in industrial research organization is that to be 

fully effective research should be set up under a civilian research director 

reporting to the technical director. 

- ... .; 

• .... -:r· - ... 

... ... . . .... .., ... - .... 

- . - --- - ------- ---- ---- -- - !• .. :. 

, . ~ 

.. - • a -

"'"' •• ....... I : P I 1"' 

- . ""'. 

. .. ' .. ~. 

. - --·- ---------··---------------""-' 

... - -

\ eclassifi ed and a 

__.,,.,,,,-- -- -~--~:-~-~7~-~ ...... ~~·~~:~··~:r~--~:.'::·:~:=--::_ ~:t_":. _::::-:-~.-~._,...~-~-~~~~~--~-~-:'.;,~~-~~~·t!· ~· ~· ~··!1!5~!!!!e.!!!:!S!!~~ ===~~===
Exhibit (32)(1)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of C-COR Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 29, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Woodle, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to my knowledge:

1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ DAVID A. WOODLE                                     
|David A. Woodle Chief Executive Officer February 7, 2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

          - [MMAA 104000]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of the proposed notice of sale for WPA Lease Sale 246.

# SUMMARY:

BOEM announces the availability of the Proposed NOS for proposed WPA Sale 246. This Notice is published pursuant to 30 CFR 556.29(c) as a matter of information to the public. With regard to oil and gas leasing on the OCS, the Secretary of the Interior, pursuant to section 19 of the OCS Lands Act, provides affected States the opportunity to review the Proposed NOS. The Proposed NOS sets forth the proposed terms and conditions of the sale, including minimum bids, royalty rates, and rental rates.

# DATES:

                        Affected States may comment on the size, timing, and location of proposed WPA Sale 246 within 60 days following their receipt of the Proposed NOS. The Final NOS will be published in the                         **Federal Register**                         at least 30 days prior to the date of bid opening. Bid opening currently is scheduled for August 19, 2015.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Robert Samuels, Chief, Leasing Division,                         *Robert.Samuels@boem.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Proposed NOS for WPA Sale 246 and the Proposed NOS Package containing information essential to potential bidders may be obtained from the Public Information Unit, Gulf of Mexico Region, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, 1201 Elmwood Park Boulevard, New Orleans, Louisiana 70123-2394. Telephone: (504) 736-2519. The Proposed NOS and Proposed NOS Package also are available on BOEM's Web site at                     *http://www.boem.gov/​Sale-246/​.*

Dated: February 6, 2015.

Abigail Ross Hopper,

Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.

[FR Doc. 2015-04347 Filed 3-2-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
USCIB: 13.?/10 ~:A6586'9 

14 April 1954 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEM8EBB OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

Reference: 

P..eview of "Need to Know" of Personnel Employed in 

Private Industry. 

USCIB 13.7/9 dated 7 April 1954. 

1. In the above reference it was suggested that each USCIB 

member review the "need to know" of employees of commercial firms and 

civilian research organizations currently indoctrinated by him, 

coordinating with other members having liaison requirements with the 

same activity, in an attempt to reduce an apparently excessive number 

of COMINT cleared persons in private industry. 

2. It appears that the problem of coordination will be difficult 

unless a central record of such indoctrinations is maintained. A 

suitable place for such a record would be the Office of the Executive 

Secretary, USCIB. 

3. It is therefore suggested that each member of USCIB keep the 

Executive Secretary currently informed of all persons in private 

industry who are indoctrinated for CCMINT by him. The following 

information is needed at the time of such indoctrination: (a) full 

name of the ind:f.vidual, (b) name and location of the organization for 

which he works and (c) date of indoctrination. The same information 

is required at the time of debriefing except that "date of debriefing" 

should be substituted for 11date of indoctrination". 

4. If this were done, any member desiring to indoctrinate or 

debrief such persons could save time and trouble by checking with the 

Office of the Executive Secretary prior to attempting coordination 

of clearance or debriefing with other members. 

5. It is further suggested that each member furnish the Executive 

Secretary, as soon as convenient, a complete list, by organization, of 

all persons in private industry who are currently indoctrinated for 

COMINT by him. These reports should contain the information requested 

in paragraph 3 above. Negative reports are also desired. 

USCIB: 1.3.7/10 

eclassified and a ursuant to E. 0. 1352
****

****

****

   

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intergraph Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Larry J. Laster,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

           (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                      of the Company.

By:          /s/ Larry J. Laster Name:    Larry J. Laster                                                        Title:       Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:      August 6, 2004     

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Intergraph Corporation and will be retained by Intergraph Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
|  |
|--|
|  |  |
[LETTERHEAD OF AVEROX]

                                                               Dated: 19/09/2007

Dear Mr. Graham Hill

We are pleased to inform you that based on continuous employment with Averox
from July 1, 2007 to June 30th, 2009 Averox shall grant you 13793 stocks on July
1st, 2009. you will be able to vest your stocks on July 1st, 2010. at the time
of vesting, all relevant regulations of USA as well as Pakistan's governing
authorities will be applicable. However before the mentioned will get void.

Averox expects a long term and sincere association from you and wishes you all
the best for your career at Averox.

Regards


/s/ Imaran Haider

Imaran Haider
Manager HR
USCIB: 29. /14 II*Nm:.Ei VIA 00.Uilff 011kNNmiS Otftif 

15 February 1955 

'f OP S!leftET 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

References: 

Procedure for Handling Intercept Base Rights Problems. 

(a) USCIB 2$./12, dated 21 January 1955. 

(b) USCIB 29./13, dated 1 February 1955. 

No objections having been received by 11 February 1955, the procedure 

set forth in reference (a), as amended by the revised pages forwarded with 

reference (b), is considered approved and will henceforth serve as guidance 

to all member organizations on the above subject. 

USCIB: 29. /14 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-17-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352B 

TOP S£CRE'f
EXHIBIT 23

                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT





         The Board of Directors and Stockholders
         The Netplex Group, Inc.:


         We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration  statement
         of The Netplex Group, Inc. on Form S-8 (No. ) of our report dated April
         19,  1999,  with  respect  to the  consolidated  balance  sheets of The
         Netplex Group,  Inc. and  subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997
         and the related  consolidated  statements of operations,  stockholders'
         equity,  and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year  period
         ended December 31, 1998, which report appears in the December 31, 1998,
         Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Netplex Group, Inc.


                                                                        KPMG LLP

         McLean, VA
         April 19, 1999
KINDER MORGAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



NAME OF COMPANY                                           STATE OF INCORPORATION
---------------                                           ----------------------

CGT Trailblazer, L.L.C...........................................Delaware
Colton Processing Facility.......................................California
Dakota Bulk Terminal, Inc........................................Wisconsin
Delta Terminal Services, Inc.....................................Delaware
HBM Environmental, Inc...........................................Louisiana
HBM Environmental Holding Co., Inc...............................Louisiana
HBM River Plant, Inc.............................................Louisiana
Kinder Morgan Bulk Terminals, Inc................................Louisiana
Kinder Morgan Canada Company.....................................Nova Scotia
Kinder Morgan CO2, LLC...........................................Delaware
Kinder Morgan CO2 Company, L.P...................................Texas
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P...............................Delaware
Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC....................Colorado
Kinder Morgan NGL L.P............................................Delaware
Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "A".................................Delaware
Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "B".................................Delaware
Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "C".................................Delaware
Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "D".................................Delaware
Kinder Morgan Texas Gas Services LLC.............................Delaware
Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, L.P................................Delaware
Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline GP LLC..............................Delaware
Kinder Morgan Trailblazer, LLC...................................Delaware
Kinder Morgan Transmix Company, LLC..............................Delaware
KMTP LLC.........................................................Delaware
Milwaukee Bulk Terminals, Inc....................................Wisconsin
Queen City Terminals, Inc........................................Delaware
RCI Contractors, Inc.............................................Delaware
River Consulting, Inc............................................Louisiana
River Consulting International, Inc..............................Delaware
River Engineered Systems, Inc....................................Louisiana
River Environmental Consulting, Inc..............................Louisiana
SFPP, L.P........................................................Delaware
Trailblazer Pipeline Company.....................................Illinois
Trimark Engineers/Constructors, Inc..............................Pennsylvania
Western Plant Services, Inc......................................California
Woodland Marine, Inc.............................................Louisiana