alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED MAY 21,2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION . -./""•''^''J 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC ••. , , ... 

IN THE MATTER OF 

AER O TIRE & TAN K LLC 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP08SW0011 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2008-1307 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter referred to as "Complainant") filed a 

Complaint dated December, 3, 2008. Aero Tire and Tank, LLC, (hereinafter referred to 

as "Respondent") filed an Answer dated December 8, 2008. 

This matter came for hearing on May 12, 13 and 14, 2010, in Arlington, TX. At the 

hearing the parties advised the court the matter had settled. Subsequent to the hearing the 

parties advised the court the settlement agreement has been finalized and the parties 

asked the matter be dismissed pursuant to their settlement agreement. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency 

attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing 

without the consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney 

withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the 

answer, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the proceedings under this 

subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Request to Dismiss having been considered, it is 

ORDERED as follows: 

1. The parties' Request to Dismiss the case be and is hereby granted; and 

This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

joodv^a 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachments - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP08SW0011 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Att: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Room 2014* 

ONE COPY 

Derrick J. Hahn 

Counsel for Respondent 

900 Jackson Street, Suite 180 

Dallas, TX 75202 

TEL: (214)744-3200 

FAX: (214)744-3202 

Rena M. Price, Senior Attorney 

Safety Enforcement Branch 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region, ASW-7E1 

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 

Fort Worth, TX 76137-0007 

TEL: (817)222-5068 

FAX: (817)222-5945 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

(202) 366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: (202)366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building - Room 

2014, Washington, DC 20591, Att: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
98-1462.

#### Waite v. Progressive Ins. Co.

Huron App. No. H-97-036. Reported at 85 Ohio St.3d 1226, 710 N.E.2d 275. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Douglas, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., dissent.
EXHIBIT 99.2

       Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
         Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Joy C. Hartman, the Chief Financial Officer of Science Dynamics
Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: August 12, 2002



                                       /s/Joy C. Hartman
                                       -----------------
                                       Name: Joy C. Hartman
                                       Title: Chief Financial Officer
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 3- 26 51

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Fran k Dea n Tea gu e
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
Lin de e Ri ce, RN, Cl ini ca l Co or din at or , Sc ott Co unt y Ja il Co rr ec tio na l H ea lth Servi ces
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll ee

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e So ut he rn Dis tri ctof I owa- Des M oi ne s

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Marc h 2 0, 2 01 4 Fi le d: Apri l 8 , 20 14 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re BYE, GRUENDER, andSHEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Fran k Teag ue ap pe al s th e di st ric t co ur t’s ad ve rs e gr an t of su m m ary jud gm en t 1 in hi s pr o se 42 U.S.C. § 19 83 act io n ag ai ns t Lin de e Ri ce, a nu rs e, who he cl ai m s was

The Hon or ab le Ro na ld E. Lon gs ta ff, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e 1 So ut he rn Dis tri ctof I owa
.de li be rat el y in di ffer en t to hi s se ri ous m ed ic al ne ed s whe n he expe ri enced da ng ero us ly

lo w bl oo d su ga r le ve ls rel at ed to hi s di ab et es , whi le he was in jail

. Upo n care fu l de

no vo rev ie w, we co nc lu de th at th e su m m ary jud gm en t reco r d es tabl is he d be y on d ge nu in e di sp ut e th at Ri ce di d no t de li be r a t e l y di sr eg ard Teag ue ’s se rio us m ed ic al

ne ed s, an d we th eref

or e co nc lu de th at su m

m ary jud gm en t was pr op erl y gr an te d in Ri ce’s fav or . See Me ui r v. Green e Cn ty. Ja il Em ps ., 48 7 F .3d11 15 , 11 18 (8t h C ir. 20 07 ) (g ran t of su m

m ary jud gm en t rev ie wed de no vo ); Sch aub v. Von W al d, 63 8 F.3 d 90 5, 9 14 (8t h C ir. 2 01 1) (to pre va il on Eig ht h Am en dm en t cl ai m fo r de pr iv at io n o f

m ed ic al care , in m at e m

us t sh ow de fen da nt kn ew of , bu t de li be rat el y di sr e g a r de d, ob jecti ve ly se rio us m ed ic al ne ed ); se e al so Hart sf ie ld v. Co lb urn, 37 1 F.3 d 45 4, 45 6- 57 (8 th Ci r. 20 04 ) (p retria l de ta in ees ’ cl ai m s are ev al ua te d un de r Due Pro ces s Cl au se rat he r th an Eig ht h Am en dm en t; ho wev er, sa m e de li be rat e-i nd iff eren ce fram ewo rk ap pl ie s t o i na de qu at e-m ed ic al -car e cl ai m s u nd er ei th er co ns ti tu ti on al pro vi si on ).

Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
,; - la, REF ID:A72292 

• CGNFiBENTiAL SEGtlfdlY .. itii1Ailud 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25. D. C. 

JUL 2 11953 

MEMORANDUM FOR :rm. W. D. WRIGHT, STATE OGA 

I I . - 1"M. s. D. ELLIS, ~m 

COL. G. P. SAMPSON, OOE 

1. Inasmuch as it is ~t possible to hold a meeting in the 

:immediate future to discuss certain proposed modi;f.'ications to the 

7 July draft of the proposed COMSEX: directive, I am inclosing 

herewith NSA proposals for your information and study. 

2. These are not the substantive proposals which require 

top-level decisions but are considered to be within the scope of 

the original drafting canmittee for resolution. 

3. It is hoped that an early meeting can be arranged to 

consider these proposals. 

~R~~ 

C0NFJ9ENT1Al 

Colonel, US krirry" 

Deputy Director 

eclassified and a roved or release b NS on 09-23-2014 ursuantt E.O. 1352 
• il'c(t)(cl) G~tmlffiNfOJLMATION ')(: Under policies promulgated by the board and subject !'the exception 

granted the Director, Central Intelligence Agency Under NSCIB No. 5, conduct 

and coordiDate the conduct of liaison on tecbnical. COMSEC and related ma.tters 

with the cryptologic agencies of foreign nations and internation organizations. 

~ c:.(()(e) 

1. In consonance with the policies of the Board provide technical guidance 

and support for cryptosecurity training conducted by the departments and 

agencies; 

..:l c: {IJ(JU 

1 · In meeting operationa1 requirements the Director of NSA will insure 

the compatibility add, insofar as practicable, the standardization o-r crypto- < 

equipments and material in order to promote maximum efficiency and economy 

in their procul!ement, operation·and maintenance. Determ1Dation of the 

acceptability of the physical embodiments of crypto-principles is a function 

of the various departments and agencies; 

c:z c (tk:-) ' 

aii. The Director of NBA will furnish services and materials for the 

COMSEC programs of the departments and agencies on a fiscal arrangement as 

mut~lly agreed with the departments and agencies. 

~cl.1XiJ ~· The Director, :NSA. is responsible for insuring adequate capacity 

for and providing technical criteria for producing cryptomateriaJ. to meet 

legitimate requirements. Noth~ng in this directive shall be construed as 

precluding the Director, NSA from producing, printl\ng, procuring, and 

modifying cryptomaterials to meet the requirements of the departments and 

agencies or from.budgeting f~r the conduct of his activities. 

2 c (.3) Subject to review by the Board· in .the event of disagreement1 the 

Director of NSA will1 in collaboration with the departments and agencie~, aa 

appropriate1 .formlate ~ standards for physical. security of cryptosystems 

and related cryptomaterial. 

CONFIBflll
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

ATKINSON & MULLEN TRAVEL, INC.

AND ATKINSON & MULLEN TRAVEL II,

LLC T/A APPLE VACATIONS,

 Respondents

 v.

JOHN J. O'BRIEN, III, O'BRIEN &

O'BRIEN, LLP, O'BRIEN & O'BRIEN

ASSOCIATES, LOUIS TUCKER,

JACQUELINE TUCKER AND CHRISTINA

TUCKER,

 Petitioners

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 377 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 02606**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### 02606\02606_ Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 02606\02606_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 02606\02606_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 02606\02606_Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 

### 02606\02606_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02606\02606_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02606\02606_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02606\02606_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02606\02606_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02606\Plant Contacts\02606_021511 SLE WWT1 Table D4 Revision.pdf Portion of Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02606\Plant Contacts\02606_021511 SLE WWT2 Table D4 Revision.pdf Portion of Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02606\Plant Contacts\02606_RE State Line Energy - Steam Electric Follow Up Questions.doc Email communications regarding questions on the survey response x 

### 02606\Plant Contacts\02606_RE2 State Line Energy - Steam Electric Follow Up Questions.doc Email communications regarding questions on the survey response x 

### 02606\Plant Contacts\02606_State Line Energy - Steam Electric Follow Up Questions.doc Email communications regarding questions on the survey response



### 02606\Supporting Documents\02606_SL_A5-2 Maps.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02606\Supporting Documents\02606_SL_A5-3_ WB_1A.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02606\Supporting Documents\02606_SL_D3-1_block diagram BD1 NPDES 003_601.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

.
Exhibit 99.1

           WRITTEN STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      The undersigned, Deborah C. Wright, is the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Carver Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company").

      This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2003 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that:

            A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

            B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  covered by the Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that
this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended.

June 27, 2003                               /s/ Deborah C. Wright
------------------------                    ------------------------------------
Dated                                                  Deborah C. Wright

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
.. - ~'!!'-.'5!!.-- - - - --- • - ,__ • ~ -- • 

REF ID: A6.6~7~. :::i · . -- .:;. .:,. '!::1 ~ "J- iW /M-c _,._. • • ) / 

E= l 

AS-61 6 Mal' 49 

~ - .,_ 

Aae.ndment. to 1U.nute• of C1:r1l 1.an 

J'aploJment .Board Ke.t.ina 19 Apr.11 1949 

Ill-. Sulli'Tan/222 

'l'he minut.ee ot t.he Ci'Y.\U•n !Bplo,._nt Board 

JIHting 19 April 1949 are emended by deleting the ••com 

,..ragraph under It• 2 'ti. &rad. csub•titutiinc ~· tolloWlD&: 

"Kr. Rowlett 1tated that he belinea the ruponsibilit;r tor such eontrol relit• 

with the Chitlt of the Agenc7 and that in hie opinion control 111 nece1•al7 but 

lhould .not be 1trictl7 a Stat! ta.notion. lb'. Cla:rk 1nd1cated t.bat 1n oert.ain 

lnstanc:ea he felt control llhould be delegated.. Ill'. 8ulliftll 1a1cl there ehould 

be •ome line betw•n minor reorganisation approved b7 1111.it chief a and those 

•jor chanaes requir:lng approval by a control bocf;r. Ill'. Rowlett aaicl that there 

!a no d.t'1n1te line ot separation between ainor am -jor changes 1D an organisation. He furt.her indicated hi• belief that olear]T 4.tin..S. •jor ahangea ll1l.t be 

4ec1ded upon bl' \he agency chief while c1-.rl.7 cletinecl llinor change• ar• proper'.1.7 

an #hdni•t.rat,1ye twict.1on of the operating unit apenisor; thoae change• which 

al"• not clearl;r defined aa either major or ainor mWJt therefore at. lea•t b• dimouaed with or otherwise bro'Ught to the attention ot the Chi.t ot the .lgenc7 who 

would indicate his cleaire• 1D regard to t\lrther action. Ur. SU.l.li•an .tated. that. 

when the d.ra.tt ot the statement. ot policy ill aireulated, coJamts on euch control 

aan be •ttache4 1t d.eaired.• 

tlOBM L. SUU.IVAJI 

CM.et'~ Pe:raonnel and 

fl'a1n1n& llranch 

. -- -· -... -. _.,...,. ~ 

- ~ ...... 

• j eclassified and a roved for release b NSA on 04-17 2014 

-----
Exhibit 32.2



ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned officer of ZOLL Medical Corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies that, to my knowledge, the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended October 1, 2006 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be a part of the
Report or filed for any purpose whatsoever.



|                        |  |  |  |       |  |                      |  |                                                                               
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----- |  | -------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: December 15, 2006 |  |  |  | Name: |  | /s/ A. Ernest Whiton
|                        |  |  |  |       |  |                      |  | A. Ernest Whiton, Vice President of Administration and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

ZACHARY HILL §

§

vs. § Case No. 01-14-00945-CR

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS §

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF 

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THIS COURT:

Appellant Zachary Hill, through counsel, moves the Court to extend time to file 

his brief, due July 30, 2015, for the following reasons:

1. Counsel, Assistant Public Defender, Melissa Martin has been working on many 

cases including, but not limited to Humphrey v. State , 14-15-00226-CR; Carter v. State, 01-

14-01006-CR; Gilder v. State, PD-0975-15; as well as the instant case and has been unable 

to complete the brief despite due diligence.

2. This is the first request for an extension in this case.

In view of the foregoing, Mr. Hill asks the Court to extend the time to file his 

brief for 30 days, or up to and including August 29, 2015. This request is made in the 

interest of justice and effective assistance of counsel and not for purposes of delay.

Respectfully submitted,

ALEXANDER BUNIN

Chief, Harris County Public Defender’s Office

/s/ Melissa Martin

_________________________________

MELISSA MARTIN

Assistant Public Defender

TX. Bar No. 24002532

1201 Franklin St., 13th Fl.

Houston, TX 77002

email: melissa.martin@pdo.hctx.net

713/274-6709 Fax 713/437-4319

ACCEPTED

01-14-00945-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

7/31/2015 10:45:17 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/31/2015 10:45:17 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing motion was electronically served on the 

Harris County District Attorney’s office on July 31, 2015.

/s/ Melissa Martin

_________________________________

Melissa Martin
# CE2004084EN.01086601.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/866 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/866

---

(2004/C 84 E/0958)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0748/04

by José García-Margallo y Marfil (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(11 March 2004)

Subject:   Synergy in EU funding programmes

Subject:

If there is to be greater operational synergy amongst the many EU funding programmes, there must be considerably better coordination between the European Investment Bank and the Commission.

Hence why has there not hitherto been better coordination between structural funds, R&D funds, cohesion funds and EIB/EIF loans? Would it be feasible to set up an independent unit within the Commission for the purpose of effectively coordinating the management of funds within the various directorates-general, and also the funding provided by the EIB and the EIF?

Answer given by Mr Solbes Mira on behalf of the Commission

(7 April 2004)

(7 April 2004)

The Commission and the European Investment Bank (EIB) Group (1) have established practices to coordinate the use of their financing instruments by means of inter-institutional cooperation agreements or joint memoranda of understanding covering in particular the areas of regional development and research and development.

1

Furthermore, the Commission and the services of the EIB Group have been examining together, in the context of a Joint Working Party, practical ways to increase the combined use of the respective financing tools of the two institutions, in particular through more streamlined procedures and a more systematic and timely exchange of information on upcoming projects.

With respect to coordination between EIB and Structural and Cohesion Funds, a number of important steps have already been taken to facilitate the joint programming of interventions (global commitments by the European Investment Fund (EIF) in the framework of Community Support Frameworks; appropriate modulation of intervention rate; advisory role of the EIF in developing financing mechanisms for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) at regional level). As regards collaboration between the Research and Development Framework Programme and the EIB Group, the above-mentioned cooperation agreement establishes a framework for joint work. Similar agreements are envisaged for other major policy areas, notably those where EIB financing can provide a crucial complement to Community budget intervention.

Against that background the Commission does not consider the establishment of a special coordination unit to be necessary.

---

(1)  The EIB Group includes the EIB itself and the European Investment Fund (EIF).

1

---