9694 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 36 / Tuesday, February 24, 2015 / Notices 

1See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From Japan 

and the United Kingdom: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews; 2010– 

2011, 80 FR 4248 (January 27, 2015) (Final Results). 

2See letter from NSK, ‘‘Ball Bearings and Parts 

from the United Kingdom: Ministerial Error 

Allegation’’ (January 27, 2015). 

3See Letter From Timken, ‘‘Ball Bearings and 

Parts Thereof From the United Kingdom; The 

Timken Company’s Reply to NSK’s Ministerial 

Error Allegation’’ (February 2, 2015). 

components to the scope of authority. 

Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), 

additional FTZ authority would be 

limited to the specific foreign-status 

materials and components and specific 

finished products described in the 

submitted notification (as described 

below) and subsequently authorized by 

the FTZ Board. 

Production under FTZ procedures 

could exempt VGACO from customs 

duty payments on the foreign status 

materials and components used in 

export production. On its domestic 

sales, VGACO would be able to choose 

the duty rate during customs entry 

procedures that applies to passenger 

motor vehicles (duty rate 2.5%) for the 

foreign status materials and components 

noted below and in the existing scope 

of authority. Customs duties also could 

possibly be deferred or reduced on 

foreign status production equipment. 

The materials and components 

sourced from abroad include: Polyvinyl 

chloride (PVC) hoses; PVC sheets; 

adhesive tapes; reading coils; and, 

interface USB hubs (duty rate ranges 

from free to 5.8%). 

Public comment is invited from 

interested parties. Submissions shall be 

addressed to the FTZ Board’s Executive 

Secretary at the address below. The 

closing period for their receipt is April 

6, 2015. 

A copy of the notification will be 

available for public inspection at the 

Office of the Executive Secretary, 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 

21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 

1401 Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the 

‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the FTZ 

Board’s Web site, which is accessible 

via www.trade.gov/ftz. 

For further information, contact Pierre 

Duy at Pierre.Duy@trade.gov or (202) 

482–1378. 

Dated: February 6, 2015. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2015–03772 Filed 2–23–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–412–801] 

Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From 

the United Kingdom: Amended Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2010–2011 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) is amending its final 

results in the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on ball 

bearings and parts thereof from the 

United Kingdom for the period May 1, 

2010, through April 30, 2011, to correct 

a ministerial error. 

DATES: Effective Date: February 24, 

2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Thomas Schauer, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–0410. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 27, 2015, the Department 

published its final results in the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on ball bearings 

and parts thereof from the United 

Kingdom 1 On January 27, 2015, NSK 

Europe Ltd. and NSK Bearings Europe 

Ltd. (collectively, NSK), submitted a 

ministerial error allegation.2 On 

February 2, 2015, The Timken Company 

submitted comments.3 Based on the 

analysis of this allegation, we made a 

change to the calculation of the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

NSK and for certain of the nonindividually examined respondents. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the order are 

ball bearings and parts thereof. These 

products include all antifriction 

bearings that employ balls as the rolling 

element. Imports of these products are 

classified under the following 

categories: Antifriction balls, ball 

bearings with integral shafts, ball 

bearings (including radial ball bearings) 

and parts thereof, and housed or 

mounted ball bearing units and parts 

thereof. 

Imports of these products are 

classified under the following 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 

3926.90.45, 4016.93.10, 4016.93.50, 

6909.19.50.10, 8414.90.41.75, 

8431.20.00, 8431.39.00.10, 8482.10.10, 

8482.10.50, 8482.80.00, 8482.91.00, 

8482.99.05, 8482.99.35, 8482.99.25.80, 

8482.99.65.95, 8483.20.40, 8483.20.80, 

8483.30.40, 8483.30.80, 8483.50.90, 

8483.90.20, 8483.90.30, 8483.90.70, 

8708.50.50, 8708.60.50, 8708.60.80, 

8708.93.30, 8708.93.60.00, 8708.99.06, 

8708.99.31.00, 8708.99.40.00, 

8708.99.49.60, 8708.99.58, 

8708.99.80.15, 8708.99.80.80, 

8803.10.00, 8803.20.00, 8803.30.00, 

8803.90.30, 8803.90.90, 8708.30.50.90, 

8708.40.75.70, 8708.40.75.80, 

8708.50.79.00, 8708.50.89.00, 

8708.50.91.50, 8708.50.99.00, 

8708.70.60.60, 8708.80.65.90, 

8708.93.75.00, 8708.94.75, 

8708.95.20.00, 8708.99.55.00, 

8708.99.68, and 8708.99.81.80. 

Although the HTSUS item numbers 

above are provided for convenience and 

customs purposes, the written 

description of the scope of the order 

remains dispositive. 

The size or precision grade of a 

bearing does not influence whether the 

bearing is covered by the order. The 

order covers all the subject bearings and 

parts thereof (inner race, outer race, 

cage, rollers, balls, seals, shields, etc.) 

outlined above with certain limitations. 

With regard to finished parts, all such 

parts are included in the scope of the 

order. For unfinished parts, such parts 

are included if they have been heattreated or if heat treatment is not 

required to be performed on the part. 

Thus, the only unfinished parts that are 

not covered by the order are those that 

will be subject to heat treatment after 

importation. The ultimate application of 

a bearing also does not influence 

whether the bearing is covered by the 

order. Bearings designed for highly 

specialized applications are not 

excluded. Any of the subject bearings, 

regardless of whether they may 

ultimately be utilized in aircraft, 

automobiles, or other equipment, are 

within the scope of the order. 

Ministerial Error 

Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 

351.224(f) define a ‘‘ministerial error’’ as 

an error ‘‘in addition, subtraction, or 

other arithmetic function, clerical error 

resulting from inaccurate copying, 

duplication, or the like, and any other 

similar type of unintentional error 

which the Secretary considers 

ministerial.’’ 

On January 27, 2015, NSK submitted 

a ministerial error allegation. After 

analyzing NSK’s allegation, we agree 

with NSK that we made a ministerial 

error within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.224(f) by using an incorrect 

database for NSK’s costs, instead of a 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 36 / Tuesday, February 24, 2015 / Notices 9695 

4For a full discussion of this clarification, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

5See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From Japan 

and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Sunset 

Reviews and Revocation of Antidumping Duty 

Orders, 79 FR 16771 (March 26, 2014). 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 

64565 (October 30, 2014) at 64567. 

revised database for NSK’s costs 

submitted later in the review. Timken 

argues that the Department should reject 

NSK’s allegation on the grounds that 

NSK could have raised the allegation in 

its case brief and it is, therefore, now 

untimely. Nevertheless, we find that we 

made an inadvertent error in not using 

the revised database for NSK’s costs 

and, therefore, are correcting and 

amending the final results of review in 

accordance with section 751(h) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e). As a result, 

the weighted-average dumping margin 

for NSK changes from 1.55 percent to 

1.43 percent. Furthermore, the rate for 

the respondents not selected for 

individual examination (except for 

Bayerische Motoren Werke AG) will be 

the new rate calculated for NSK, the 

sole respondent selected for individual 

examination. The weighted-average 

dumping margin for Bayerische Motoren 

Werke AG will remain unchanged from 

the Final Results because it was based 

on adverse facts available. 

Amended Final Results of the Review 

The Department determines that the 

following amended weighted-average 

dumping margins exist for the period 

May 1, 2010, through April 30, 2011: 

Company 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Bayerische Motoren Werke AG .. 254.25 

Bosch Rexroth Limited ............... 1.43 

Caterpillar S.A.R.L ...................... 1.43 

Caterpillar Group Services S.A .. 1.43 

Caterpillar of Australia Pty Ltd ... 1.43 

Caterpillar Overseas S.A.R.L ..... 1.43 

Caterpillar Marine Power UK ...... 1.43 

NSK ............................................ 1.43 

Perkins Engines Company Ltd ... 1.43 

Disclosure 

We will disclose the calculation 

memorandum used in our analysis to 

parties to this proceeding within five 

days of the date of the publication of 

this notice pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

The Department shall determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

on all appropriate entries. In accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), for NSK we 

calculated an importer-specific 

assessment rate by dividing the total 

amount of dumping for the reviewed 

sales by the total entered value of those 

reviewed sales for each importer. 

Consistent with the Department’s 

refinement to its assessment practice, 

for entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by NSK for 

which it did not know that the 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate un-examined entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction.4

For the companies which were not 

selected for individual examination, we 

will instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties at a rate equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin listed above 

for all entries of subject merchandise 

produced and/or exported by such 

firms. 

We intend to issue liquidation 

instructions to CBP 15 days after 

publication of the amended final results 

of this administrative review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Because we revoked the antidumping 

duty order on ball bearings and parts 

thereof from the United Kingdom 

effective September 15, 2011, no cash 

deposits for estimated antidumping 

duties on future entries of subject 

merchandise will be required.5

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Department’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

Administrative Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or the 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

amended final results in accordance 

with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.224(f). 

Dated: February 18, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2015–03770 Filed 2–23–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–912] 

Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road 

Tires From the People’s Republic of 

China: Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2013–2014 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On October 30, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) initiated an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on new 

pneumatic off-the-road tires (‘‘OTR 

tires’’) from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’) for 12 companies.1 Based 

on timely withdrawal of requests for 

review, we are now rescinding this 

administrative review with respect to 

Double Coin Holdings Ltd., Guizhou 

Tyre Co., Ltd., and Guizhou Tyre Import 

and Export Co., Ltd. 

DATES: Effective Date: February 24, 

2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andrew Medley, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 

482–4987. 

Background 

In September 2014, the Department 

received multiple timely requests to 

conduct an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on OTR tires 

from the PRC. Based upon these 

requests, on October 30, 2014, the 

Department published a notice of 

initiation of an administrative review 

covering the period of September 1, 

2013, to August 31, 2014, with respect 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES