alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 39 (Friday, February 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 10665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04268]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Emerging Technology and Research Advisory Committee; Notice of 
Open Meeting

    The Emerging Technology and Research Advisory Committee (ETRAC) 
will meet on March 12, 2015, 8:45 a.m., Room 3884, at the Herbert C. 
Hoover Building, 14th Street between Pennsylvania and Constitution 
Avenues NW., Washington, DC The Committee advises the Office of the 
Assistant Secretary for Export Administration on emerging technology 
and research activities, including those related to deemed exports.

Agenda

Thursday, March 12

Open Session

1. Welcome and Introductions
2. Opening Remarks by the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration
3. Report on Association of University Export Control Officials, 
Washington, DC Conference
4. Presentation by Dr. Peter M. Vallone, National Institute of 
Standards and Technology
5. Tentative-Update on Wassenaar deliberations
6. Cuba Update
7. Recruitment of ETRAC members
8. Harmonization of definitions-fundamental research
9. Report: Export Control Classification Number Review
10. Review by ETRAC committee members of their assigned categories to 
determine viability

    The open session will be accessible via teleconference to 20 
participants on a first come, first serve basis. To the conference, 
submit inquiries to Ms. Yvette Springer at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3c654a59484859126f4c4e55525b594e7c5e554f1258535f125b534a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f2ab8497868697dca182809b9c959780b2909b81dc969d91dc959d84">[email protected]</span></a>, 
no later than March 5, 2015.
    A limited number of seats will be available for the public session. 
Reservations are not accepted. To the extent that time permits, members 
of the public may present oral statements to the Committee. The public 
may submit written statements at any time before or after the meeting. 
However, to facilitate the distribution of public presentation 
materials to the Committee members, the Committee suggests that 
presenters forward the public presentation materials prior to the 
meeting to Ms. Springer via email.
    For more information, call Yvette Springer at (202) 482-2813.

    Dated: February 23, 2015.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-04268 Filed 2-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
My name is Steve Sywensky. I am the owner of Fly Fishers Paradise in State College. 

Sportfishing (fishing for fun) is big business in Pennsylvania. In fact, according to 

data from Penn State University, it is a nearly two billion dollar per year 

industry. By contrast the National Football League is a 9.5 billion dollar annual 

business. For forty years I have owned and operated a fishing tackle business in 

central Pennsylvania. My store employs six part-time workers, as well as myself of 

course, and uses more than a few vendors, many of whom are also from 

Pennsylvania. We also have customers and suppliers in states across the country. 

My business, whether looking at local trade or business in the larger sense, is highly 

dependent on water quality and wild fish stocks. Water temperature, and 

especially cooler temperatures, should also be viewed as a component of water 

quality. Warmer water holds less oxygen and encourages the growth of disease 

vectors, both of which are highly detrimental to fish populations. Consistently 

warmer temperatures are extremely injurious to wild trout, the foundation upon 

which fly-fishing businesses like mine rest. Even warm water fish like smallmouth 

bass, however, have felt the impact of warming waters in central Pennsylvania 

rivers like the juniata and the Susquehanna. Warm water, occasioned by climate 

change, certainly has contributed to the population crash of smallmouth in both 

rivers. 

In addition to a negative economic impact, climate change is also threatening what is 

a long tradition of sport fishing in Pennsylvania. The first split cane rods in America 

were manufactured in Pennsylvania. Authors from Theodore Gordon on have 

sampled the superb trout waters of Pennsylvania, and their writing has brought the 

angling public with their tourist dollars to our state. Our fine wild fish populations 

and our strong tradition of angling for them should be jealously guarded, zealously 

managed, and passed on to our children and grandchildren, not thrown onto the 

trash heap of fossil fuel. 

At one time, we thought using DDT was necessary. We now know better. Similarly, 

we thought our use of fossil fuels had no consequences. We now know better. We 

need to begin the process of reducing use of these dirty fuels as fast as possible so 

that future generations can enjoy the same fishing and hunting heritage that we 

have been privileged to enjoy. Your rule is a good first step, but we need to do more. 

I urge you to revise your proposed rule to require even deeper reductions in carbon 

pollution. Global warming is already harming my business and all of us who work in 

the outdoor recreation industry. There is no time to lose.
IC 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1698 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2015 

Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

AN ACT 

To exclude payments from State eugenics compensation programs from consideration in determining eligibility for, 

or the amount of, Federal public benefits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

S 1698 RFH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Treatment of Certain 

3 Payments in Eugenics Compensation Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF PAYMENTS FROM STATE EUGENICS 

5 COMPENSATION PROGRAMS FROM CONSID6 ERATION IN DETERMINING ELIGIBILITY FOR, 

7 OR THE AMOUNT OF, FEDERAL PUBLIC BENE8 FITS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi10 sion of law, payments made under a State eugenics com11 pensation program shall not be considered as income or 

12 resources in determining eligibility for, or the amount of, 

13 any Federal public benefit. 

14 (b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section: 

15 (1) FEDERAL PUBLIC BENEFIT.—The term 

16 ‘‘Federal public benefit’’ means— 

17 (A) any grant, contract, loan, professional 

18 license, or commercial license provided by an 

19 agency of the United States or by appropriated 

20 funds of the United States; and 

21 (B) any retirement, welfare, health, dis22 ability, public or assisted housing, postsec23 ondary education, food assistance, unemploy24 ment benefit, or any other similar benefit for 

25 which payments or assistance are provided to 

26 an individual, household, or family eligibility 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

S 1698 RFH

1 unit by an agency of the United States or by 

2 appropriated funds of the United States. 

3 (2) STATE EUGENICS COMPENSATION PRO4 GRAM.—The term ‘‘State eugenics compensation 

5 program’’ means a program established by State law 

6 that is intended to compensate individuals who were 

7 sterilized under the authority of the State. 

Passed the Senate November 30, 2015. 

Attest: JULIE E. ADAMS, 

Secretary. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### Faulk, 

## Scott (OSn Subject: DOT-OST-1995-361

From: prvs=708e9d125=Scott.Faulk@dot.gov [mailto:prvs=708e9d125=Scott.Faulk@dot.gov] On BehalfOfScott.Faulk@dot.gov Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 12:50 PM To: wpcommission@mwpower.net; Dennis.DeVany@dot.gov Cc: kbrown@mwpower.net Subject: RE: EAS and James Adams Patrice, Thank you foryour email. Your request is approved and the new due date for objections will be January 23rd. Kind regards, Scott From: Patrice Lytle [wpcommission@mwpower.net] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 2:04 PM To: Faulk, Scott (OST) Cc: kbrown@mwpower.net Subject: RE: EAS and James Adams Scott, Iappreciate you checking into this for us. In reading your previous email., the notice went to Ely Jet Center. This business is not part ofWhite Pine County at all. It is a private business. Mr. Adams is notthe chairman ofthe White Pine County Airport Advisory Board. Iwould appreciate it ifall correspondence that was sentto him be copied to the County here at this email. Mr. Adams has not been given authority by the Countyto make decisions or communicate on their behalf, and if he has received any information, he has not passed that on to the County Commission orthe Airport Manager. Also, the Airport Advisory Board isjustthat an advisory board. They do not have the authorityto make decisions forthe County, that responsibility is with the Board ofCounty Commission. Mr. Adams has not communicated with myselfas the Acting Airport Manager either. Knowing nowthatthe County was not properly noticed, I hereby ask that an extension be granted for another 20 days in orderforWhite Pine County to respond to the orderto show cause proposingtermination of Essential Air Service Eligibility dated December 14, 2012, Docket DOT-OST-1995-361. Iwould appreciate that in the future all correspondence regarding the White Pine County Airport be sent to White Pine County at this email orthe mailing address of953 Campton Street, Ely, NV 89301 orthe Ely Airport at P.O. Box 150631, Ely, NV 89315. Patrice Lytle Department Manager White Pine County Commission and Acting Airport Manager 775-293-6562 wpcommission@mwpower.net<mailto:wpcommission@mwpower.net>

1
# CE2004084EN.01089701.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/897 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/897

---

(2004/C 84 E/0991)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0866/04

by Miet Smet (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(22 March 2004)

Subject:   European subsidies for the Flemish Community

Subject:

Can the Commission answer the following:

| 1. | What were the findings of the auditing bodies with regard to the financial management and accountability of the Flemish Community in Belgium in respect of European subsidies, what recommendations were made, and how were these recommendations implemented by the Flemish Community? |
| --- | --- |

1.

What were the findings of the auditing bodies with regard to the financial management and accountability of the Flemish Community in Belgium in respect of European subsidies, what recommendations were made, and how were these recommendations implemented by the Flemish Community?

| 2. | How many investigations were made by the European Court of Auditors in relation to subsidies to the Flemish Community, within the framework of the Statement of Assurance, for each year of the period 1999 to 2003? |
| --- | --- |

2.

How many investigations were made by the European Court of Auditors in relation to subsidies to the Flemish Community, within the framework of the Statement of Assurance, for each year of the period 1999 to 2003?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(29 April 2004)

(29 April 2004)

In accordance with normal procedures, the Commission departments responsible for Structural Funds have checked the systems put in place by the Flemish Community of Belgium to manage these funds. They have made a number of recommendations to the Flemish authorities in relation to various elements. The Flemish authorities have accepted the recommendations and the commitments to this effect are being followed up. The Directorate General for Regional Policy informed the Parliament of its findings for the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) in a report of 30 April 2003.

The European Court of Auditors has audited the current management and control systems for Structural Funds set up by the Flemish Community twice, in 2002 and 2003, for the years 2001 and 2002 respectively within the framework of the Statement of Assurance. The Honourable Member is referred to the Court's annual reports for 2001 and 2002 (1).

1

---

(1)  OJ C 295, 28.11.2002 and OJ C 286, 28.11.2003.

1

---
### North Carolina Department

### of Environment and Natural Resources Divisionof 

### Air Quality Beverly Eaves Perdue Sheila 

### C.Holman Dee Freeman Governor Director Secretary

Lynorae Benjamin USEPA Region 

### 4 Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW Atlanta, 

### GA 30303-8960 /L ,!)&i~-^ Dear 

### Ms. ~enjdid: As per our discussion, the attached two appendices are from the Section 110(a)(l) Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard for 

### Greensboro/Winston-Salem/High Point 1

-Hour Ozone Maintenance Area submittal. In preparing the final submittal, Appendix 

### C, which is the SESARM Reference Document, was inadvertently left out. This document was referenced in the nonroad mobile sources emissions inventory development and was public noticed with the rest of the Section 

### 1lO(a)(l)maintenance plan. The Public Notice Report in the final submittal was titled as Appendix 

### C but should have been Appendix D. The corrected titled Public Notice Report is also enclosed. Enclosed is one hard copy of Appendix C and Appendix D of the Section 110(a)(l) maintenance plan and an exact duplicate electronic copy on compact disk. The compact disk contains the entire Section 1lO(a)(l) Maintenance Plan for the 1997&Hour Ozone Standard for Greensboro/Winston-Salemigh Point 1-Hour Ozone Maintenance Area submittal for ease of substitution. If you should have any questions, please give me a call at (919) 733-1488 or 1aura.boothe@ncdenr.gov. Sincerely,

Laura A Boothe Attachment cc: Nacosta Ward

1641 Mail Service Center, Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1641 2728 Capital Bivd., Raleigh, NC 27604 Phone: 919-733-3340 1FAX 919-715-7175 I Internet: www.ncar.org An EqualOpportunitylAffirmativeAction Employer 

### One 

# North

# Carolina 

# JVattlrafb
• REF ID :A67216· 

Lm!Qh SQhadult 

~ Ja Miput§@ ts, Per.W .Q&: QB iak 

. 1Jm1m:&HI Time to T111le 1n k1i. Time to Total L\UlCh 

"l.tl!ima I.~131 I ouu1 l.1£iod. 

IJ. 5 12 21 4 42 

ll ' 21 18 4 48 

13 4 8 1, ' '2 

14 5 10 21 ' "1 

,, 7 7 20 5 39 

16 10 8 15 3 36 

Average 6 11 18 4 39 

Tim 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 04-07-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
':. 

. 

r 

t--

IJanl,mt 

l/J. 

Pl 

13 

14 

Average 

T:bne 

- -~ :r 

z 

~ ·- REF ID:A67216 - ~ 

-. '-Jl'!:'I • 

LUPOA ioblAlAI 

D-;r;; Bran@· svnr SbU'Ji 

~ tD H~pptag fqr forigs! Qt ~ W1ek 

Time to Time in 

Q11•$eria. .. Lwa 

7 .,, 

4 12 

10 9 

6 7 

7 9 

·-- --·--· 

lat 

-

2S 

27 

29 

24 

26 

'rime to 

2tt1sae 

7 

s 

8 

& 

6 

,.. .u, . ... __ 

I 

i 

Total Lunoh 

l!vW 

46 

48 

,6 

43 
11 

• 

,, 

14 

REF ID:A67216 

•• I .. 

~ - - .,._ •, "!,-_ - -· .. 

I • 

... ·~ - - - . 

l·~II Dat SQtfi, 

Zt11na fm.l!At 

lama J.a 1iwte• m PJli'iOJJ. at sa -* 

1'ima to T!me in Eat !ime to 

W&ldl .L1DI - ,QW,511 

' 09 ll 

J 09 14 ' ' 4 10 15 4 

4 08 16 4 

09 l.S 

!otal Lunch 

hrJa 

29 

29 

36 

Ja 

= . - -- -~ _ .... --·~ 

'II .... ....
July 21, 2014 

Secretary Anthony F oxx 

US Secretary of Transportation 

DOT Office of the Secretary 

1200 New Jersey A venue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

- _j ~ : ..f 

FORT DODGE 

GRO\xTfH 

Sent Electronically via E-Mail 

RE: Petition of Fort Dodge, lA for a Two-Year Waiver from the 10-Enp1anement Statute 

Docket-DOT -OST -2001-10682 

Dear Secretary Foxx, 

On behalf of the Greater Fort Dodge Growth Alliance, I am submitting this petition for a two-year 

exemption from 49 U.S.C. § 41731(a)(l)(B) in terminating our EAS eligibility based upon the 10 

passenger per day statute. This request is based upon airport enplanement history and the fact that our air 

carrier suspended all air service on February 1, 2014 due to a pilot shortage. 

Fort Dodge (Webster County, Iowa) and the region are in the middle of a renaissance of economic and 

community development. The region can account for nearly 10% of the capital investment in the entire 

state from 2012-2014. With the creation of over 600 new jobs at or over above the county average wage 

within an 18 month period, produces more people with a higher disposal income. Notwithstanding the 

global companies that have been investing in the region; Cargill, CJ Bio America, Boehringer Ingelheim, 

Nestle, Koch, Silgan, Poet, John Deere, etc. These global companies expect air service that will provide 

efficient travel to their customers, suppliers, sister facilities and headquarters. 

Our region is also has a unique economic development opportunity with Cargill's investment in the 

county. Their business model is one with which attracts "over-the-fence" or co-location companies to 

create efficiencies in delivering product. If their model is as successful as the one in Blair, NE; the region 

would realize an increase of2,207 jobs and an increase of spending of $7.2 billion by 2018. 1 

Not orily has the private sector invested in the region, so has the public. The city of Fort Dodge and 

Webster County have invested over $270 Million iri public works, education, health care and quality of 

life amenities. The region is touted by Governor Branstad, Lt. Governor Reynolds, Director Durham and 

others as one of the fastest economic growth areas ofthe state oflowa. 

Air service is an essential piece to the momentous growth of the region to support our companies and 

citizens. The termination of our EAS eligibility will inhibit the growth of our region. I request that you 

grant this exemption considering the economic condition of our region. 

Sincerely, 

() 

Dennis 

~~ A. Plautz 

CEO 

Greater Fort Dodge Growth Alliance 

1. Economic Development in the North Central Iowa Growth Region: Bioenergy Impacts, Goss & 

Associates, 2014.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-1387V

UNPUBLISHED

LISA CLARK,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: April 22, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for 

petitioner.

Althea Walker Davis, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On September 11, 2019, Lisa Clark filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that that she suffered a shoulder injury related to 

vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered 

in her left shoulder on October 12, 2018. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the 

Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On April 21, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. 

Specifically, Respondent has concluded that Petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012).
2

in the Vaccine Injury Table and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation for a SIRVA.

Id. at 4. 

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
--rv-~~JW!l~~·A573ji ., 

60!ff'iBJ!ti'f!Afi - t1. 9. l!i!'fiB Oft!" 

SUBJECT NUM~ 

USCIB: 9.3/25 

Subject: 

Item S of the Agenda for the 24th Meeting of USCIBEC, 

held on 28 January 1955. 

USCIB Master Requirements List. 

At the request of the Chairman, Captain Holtwick, Chairman of the 

ad hoc committee studying the subject problem, presented an oral progress 

report. 

CAPTAIN HOLTWICK indicated that progress is being made in the drafting 

ot, a paper for USCIBEC consideration, and expressed his opinion that his 

committee recommendations will be available for consideration at the next 

meeting. 

The menbers noted the information presented. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-01-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

USCIB: 9.'3/25 - 14 - C0'4lFlfJE.NTlAL
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1



[press release]
DISCRETIONARY APPEALS ALLOWED

99-991.

#### Klosterman Baking Co., Inc. v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. Serv.

Hamilton App. No. C-980255.

Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., dissent.