alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and coll ateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### APR 25 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. KENNETH N. POWELL,

Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-5204 (N. Dist. of Oklahoma) (D.C. No. 91-CR-92E)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before SEYMOUR , Chief Judge, PORFILIO and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The c ause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Kenneth N. Powell, proceeding pro se , appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for recovery of currency and property br ought pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.-2-

P. 41(e). In his motion, Powell alleged that he wa s entitled to the return of certain property forfeited through judicial forfeiture proceedings to the United States pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 881(a). Powell cont ended that the Orders and Judgments of Forfeiture forfeiting the currency andproperty to the United States were invalid because he did not receive proper noti ce of the forfeiture proceedings. The district court denied Powell’s mo tion, holding that the United States’ attempted service of the complaint at both of Powell’s known residences, as well as its attempted service on Powell’s attorn ey and constructive notice by publication, were “‘reasonably calculated to give [ Powell] actual notice of the forfeiture proceedings.’” Dist. Ct. Order at 3 (qu oting United States v. 51 Pieces of Real Property , 17 F.3d 1306, 1317 (10th Cir. 1994)). “Whether the government employed means reasonably c alculated to provide [Powell] actual notice is a question of fact which we review for clear error.” 51 Pieces of Real Property , 17 F.3d at 1316 (citation omitted). This court h as considered the district court order, the parties’ b riefs and contentions, and the entire record on appeal. Finding no clear error, w e AFFIRM for substantially the reasons set out in the district court’s Order datedAugust 8, 1996. ENTERED FOR THE COURT,
Michael R. Murphy Circuit Judge
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1826 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 99 West 2nd Street in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, as the Lieutenant Colonel James ‘‘Maggie’’ 

Megellas Post Office. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1826 ES

1 SECTION 1. LIEUTENANT COLONEL JAMES ‘‘MAGGIE’’ 

2 MEGELLAS POST OFFICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 99 West 2nd Street in Fond du 

5 Lac, Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Lieutenant Colonel James ‘Maggie’ Megellas Post Of7 fice’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lieutenant Colonel 

12 James ‘Maggie’ Megellas Post Office’’. 

Passed the Senate August 5, 2015. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1826 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostJames ‘‘Maggie’’ Megellas Post Office. du Lac, Wisconsin, as the Lieutenant Colonel al Service located at 99 West 2nd Street in Fond
.,,/~ .......... ,\ 

1_.;' 

...... ..-

-~,··-;.. ~~. -~t' 

'-;" 

: •":. 

: .. , .. ,·.,.· .. 

· . .r '~ ', I .. 

. ~ '·. . . ·:t::; .· 1 : 

.:'? · .•. ' 

···.~·, .'; ' 

;·~ 

.. ;. 

· •• -:i 

~~<·:~r.l. -~' ;.-,• .. ., 

".· ; 

... ·• ~. ~ • ~ r 

. : ;., ~:···, ",--

·: . .;..,,,: _ · _i:o!·· .• 

"I• 

· .. 

·.:. 

. i} "(.< ····· .... ·.:--:··. ~ 1: ...... . . •. ': ~~~- . ....... -·~·-::.·!'to"· •'." .·. /7 .': . ·.;..:. > 

~:· ,, .. . ; .... : ~.r. \ ., 

.. . '• ; : ~ 

,• '~~: . 

... 

: . ~~~V:'.~ 

; . -~. ~-r ! ..... .' .•. · . 

. . .··;~. 

4':• """• 

:-.; •; 

... ~-· ... 

~:-· <:. .-~ -~. ;" •'::- .•. ~ .· 

~ .. '. .... 

:-· ..' ·.···:.• ~-./J·, i·.\: · .• .,. 

~-

: ~· .• . : ~ ... ~ -~. .. . ' :• ....... -!:!" ::: ..... ~ 

'. .. ''! . :\. 

. . ..:.·~ ... · . ·~ ' 

.. ~' 

.., .... : . ~ . 

.;.~ ,, ~ · .. ·'~ 

. ..... 

.. ' " 

.. .... 

· . . :i.':'. 

. .. , 

"t"·. 

·-~. ·~~ .. 

· .. · 

·. ~-

.- .·; 

-~·.-.-' 

t..\ 

,·-i-'.· 

. .'".I· .. '~~ .. ' i··' .. •·· 

. ... ~ ·": 

,:· 

·. 

..... 

... 

;,.•-"' 

. '~;\ 

" 

··~:';·· ·i ..... 

... ...;., 

:...'· .... ·· ~ .... ~ .. : 

.... j'· 

"t·.-· . .-.: 

' • i ·:..: .. 

. ~~ .. . 

., . 

., 

~· . 

. ...... -."'. 

·;.··· ...
<PAGE>

                                 UNITED STATES

                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                            WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



                                   FORM 8-K

               Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                          The Securities Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)               August 24, 1999



                           Commission File #0-18018


                             AEROVOX INCORPORATED
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



            Delaware                                         76-0254329
       -----------------                                  -----------------
(State or other jurisdiction of                           (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                          Identification No.)



 740 Belleville Avenue, New Bedford, MA                        02745
 --------------------------------------                        -----
(Address of principal executive offices)                    (Zip Code)



                                (508) 994-9661
                             --------------------
                         Registrant's telephone number


<PAGE>

ITEM 5.  OTHER EVENTS

On August 24, 1999, Aerovox Inc. (the "Company") reported (copy of press release
attached) that Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Jeffrey A.
Templer has resigned from the Company effective September 3, 1999. Mr. Templer
is leaving his position to pursue another opportunity.

A search is currently underway to hire a replacement for Mr. Templer.


SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                        AEROVOX INCORPORATED


DATE  August 30, 1999                   BY  /s/ JEFFREY A TEMPLER
                                            -------------------------------
                                            Jeffrey A. Templer, Senior Vice
                                            President and Chief Financial
                                            Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1774 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1774

 To amend title 11 of the United States Code to treat Puerto Rico as a 
     State for purposes of chapter 9 of such title relating to the 
                 adjustment of debts of municipalities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 15, 2015

Mr. Blumenthal (for himself, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Nelson, Mrs. Gillibrand, 
    Ms. Warren, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Booker, Mr. Reid, Mr. Murphy, Mr. 
 Sanders, Mr. Heinrich, and Ms. Hirono) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 11 of the United States Code to treat Puerto Rico as a 
     State for purposes of chapter 9 of such title relating to the 
                 adjustment of debts of municipalities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Puerto Rico Chapter 9 Uniformity Act 
of 2015''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 101(52) of title 11, United States Code, is amended to read 
as follows:
            ``(52) The term `State' includes Puerto Rico and, except 
        for the purpose of defining who may be a debtor under chapter 9 
        of this title, includes the District of Columbia.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.

    (a) Effective Date.--Except as provided in subsection (b), this Act 
and the amendment made by this Act shall take effect on the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (b) Application of Amendment.--The amendment made by this Act shall 
apply with respect to--
            (1) cases commenced under title 11 of the United States 
        Code on or after the date of the enactment of this Act; and
            (2) debts, claims, and liens created before, on, or after 
        such date.

SEC. 4. SEVERABILITY.

    If any provision of this Act or any amendment made by this Act, or 
the application of such provision or amendment to any person or 
circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act 
and the amendments made by this Act, or the application of that 
provision or amendment to other persons or circumstances, shall not be 
affected.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

Form10-Q

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   Quarterly Report PURSUANT TO Section 13 or15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010

 

 

[]   Transition Report PURSUANTTO Section 13 or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934

 

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 0-10435

 

 

CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XVI 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.  

[X]Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted onits corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to besubmitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of thischapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theregistrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
EXHIBIT 23

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-04524, 33-74026 and 33-89146) and in the
Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File
No. 333-21557) of Data Broadcasting Corporation of our report dated August 13,
1998 appearing on page 20 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  We also consent
to the incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial Statement
Schedule, which appears on page 35 of this Form 10-K.  


/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Salt Lake City, Utah
September 25, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ALLAIRE
CORPORATION'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001016139
<NAME>                        ALLAIRE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                               1,847
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        3,621
<ALLOWANCES>                                           287
<INVENTORY>                                            141
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     6,049
<PP&E>                                               5,093
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (1,609)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       9,953
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               14,562
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               12,673
<PREFERRED>                                            751
<COMMON>                                                41
<OTHER-SE>                                        (19,267)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         9,953
<SALES>                                             17,187
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    20,512
<CGS>                                                1,915
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        5,996
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    25,252
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        53
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (10,770)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (10,770)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (10,770)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (3.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (3.67)
        


</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MIGUEL HERNANDEZ ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-2929

[November 14, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Rosemarie Scher, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 2014CF010002AXX.

Miguel Hernandez, Doral, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
• REF ID:A575~3 

• 

y 

USCIB: 5.3/62 

30 November 1954 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIBEC: 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Approval of the Minutes or the 19th Meeting of USCIBEC. 

USCIB 5.3/56 dated 10 November 1954. 

1. Subject to corrections listed below the Minutes of the 19th 

Meeting of USCIBEC a.re approved: 

Page 7, paragraph 1, delete line 19, change last semicolon to a period in line 18, and insert "and" after 

"55%;" in line 18. 

Page 9, Decision, line 4 after 11NSA, 11 insert "acting as 

a representative of military intelligence 11 • 

2. It is requested that the word TENTATIVE be deleted from the 

initial page of the minutes for each item considered and the word 

FINAL substituted therefor. 

USCIB: 5.3/62 

JL.AUJ~us~~~ aptain, U. S. Navy 

.c&ailz;uti ve Secretary, USCIB 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-11-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

24
#### Dawley, Respondent, vs. City of Antigo and another, Appellants.

*December 15, 1903*

January *12, 1904.*

*Borgman v. Antigo, ante,*p. 296, followed

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Langlade ■county: John Goodland, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Eor the appellants there was a brief by *Henry*Hay, attorney, and *Max*Hoffman, of counsel, and oral argument by *.Mr. Hay.*

*Geó. W.*Latía, for the respondent.

Siebeoeee, J.

The plaintiff is a resident and property •owner of the city of *Antigo,*and brought this action to declare a special tax and assessment for sprinkling certain *303.streets in the city, invalid, and that the cloud attempted to be created upon the title to lots owned by him, as a result, of such assessment, be removed. The facts in this case are identical with the facts in the case of *Borgman v. Antigo, ante,*p. 296, 97 N. W. 936, except that respondent in this ■case did not sign a petition for sprinkling any of the streets in the city of *Antigo.*The case is .ruled by the *Borgman ■Case.*The judgment must therefore be affirmed.

*By the Court.*— -The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed October 3, 2018.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D18-1664

Lower Tribunal No. 16-25037

________________

WD 19790, LLC,

Appellant,

vs.

Dan Trust, et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Thomas J.

Rebull, Judge.

Stok Folk + Kon, and Robert A. Stok and Joshua R. Kon, for appellant.

Kluger, Kaplan, Silverman, Katzen & Levine, P.L., and Abbey L. Kaplan

and Josh M. Rubens, for appellees.

Before EMAS, LOGUE, and LUCK, JJ.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

LOGUE, J.

The order dismissing Count VI of Appellant’s Second Amended

Counterclaim is not an appealable order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure
9.110(k) as “a separate and distinct cause of action that is not interdependent with

other pleaded claims” because Count VI alleges abuse of process on the basis that

the Appellees’ Third Amended and Supplemental Complaint “is a sham and seeks

de minimis, nominal and/or technical damages, if any, without a reasonable

prospect of success.” This allegation is intertwined with the litigation still pending

in the trial court concerning the legal and factual merits of that Complaint. See,

e.g., Bardakjy v. Empire Inv. Holdings, LLC, 239 So. 3d 146, 147 (Fla. 3d DCA

2018). Accordingly, Appellees’ motion to dismiss is granted.

Appeal dismissed.

2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES L. FLOWERS, JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 189 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of January , 201 8

, the Petition for Review and the

Application for Relief are DENIED.
# CE2004084EN.01032504.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/325 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/325

---

(2004/C 84 E/0382)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0173/04

by Christopher Heaton-Harris (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(29 January 2004)

Subject:   Commission's accounting systems

Subject:

I understand the Internal Audit Service, in a report entitled ‘IAS Review of the Commission's Accounting Framework — Final Report’ dated 15 April 2003, made a number of recommendations to the Commission regarding the accounting systems.

Could the Commission confirm that in future the impact of changing valuation rules will be clearly explained in the explanatory notes to the balance sheet?

---
1

From: "Paul Boening" <PBoening@rsionline.org>

To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/01/2011 03:05 PM

Subject: RE: Recycling Services of Indiana- Potential SER nomination

Rochelle

Thanks for considering me for the panel, unfortunately we no longer have the

scrap shredder. Does that disqualify me from the group?

Paul Boening

President

812-279-8114 w

812-583-2971 c

-----Original Message-----

From: Rochelle Boyd [mailto:Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 2:24 PM

To: Paul Boening

Cc: Ravi Srivastava; Chuck French

Subject: Recycling Services of Indiana- Potential SER nomination

Back in May, the EPA sent out a news release and set up a web page

soliciting nominees to participate as a Small Entity Representative

(SER). This will allow you to provide input to the panel during this

rule making process. It is my understanding, based on your ICR

responses, that you are a small business as defined by the Small

Business Act and the EPA would like for you to consider participating in

this process. We also believe from your ICR response that you are a

Major Source with a regulated Scrap Shredder. OMB has requested that we

have a company on the SER's group meeting those requirements. Please

confirm these facts. Your level of participation is solely up to you.

You can elect to submit written comments or listen in on the conference

calls. If you are interested and you have a regulated Scrap Shredder,

please e-mail me your contact person, company name, number of employees,

and contact information as soon as possible. Thanks

Note: I have included a link to the original web posting that is no

longer active, but provides information

http://www.epa.gov/sbrefa/secondaryaluminum.htm

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711

Mail Drop D243-02

Ph: (919) 541-1390 Fax: (919) 541-3207

Email: boyd.rochelle@epa.gov
FIL ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T MARCH 23, 2012 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO N OT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 1- 11 98 5 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 1 :1 0- cr-0 02 71 -CG-N-1 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l l Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee,
ve rs us JARVIS ANDERSON, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt forth e So ut he rnDis tri ctof Al ab am a
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (March 23 , 20 12 ) Befo re BARKETT, MARTIN an d ANDERSON, Ci rcu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM:J. Cl arkSta nk os ki , app oi nt edco un se l fo r Ja rv is And ers on inth is di rect

cri m in al ap pe al , has m ov edto withdraw fro m furth er re pr es en ta ti onof t he ap pe ll an t an d fi le d abri ef p ur su an t t o An de rs v. Ca li fo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 , 87 S. Ct. 13 96 (19 67 ). Our i nd ep en de ntrev ie w of the en ti re re co rdrev eal s tha t co un se l’s as se ss m en t o f th e rel at iv e m eri t o f th e ap pe al is co rrec t. Bec au se in de pe nd en t ex am in at io n o f th e en ti re re co rdrev eal s n o arg uabl e is su es of m eri t, co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is GRANTED , andAnd ers on ’s con vi ct io ns an d s en te nc es are AFFIRMED.

2