alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
 c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
  /s/ James M. McCluneyJames M. McCluneyChief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 11.2


              BAIRNCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
       CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
    FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND OCTOBER 2, 1999
                           (Unaudited)


                                                          2000         1999
BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:

Net income                                             $7,003,000   $6,597,000

Average common shares outstanding                       7,626,000    8,005,000

Basic Earnings Per Common Share                        $     0.92   $     0.82


DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:

Net income                                             $7,003,000   $6,597,000

Average common shares outstanding                       7,626,000    8,005,000
Common shares issuable in respect to options issued
   to employees with a dilutive effect                    111,000       68,000
Total diluted common shares outstanding                 7,737,000    8,073,000

Diluted Earnings Per Common Share                      $     0.91   $     0.82
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Energiz Renewable, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2011.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Iron Eagle Group, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended June 30, 2012.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of MedClean Technologies, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2012.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed companies. Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST on February 25, 2015, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on March 10, 2015.

      ( print page 10744)    
By the Commission.

Jill M. Peterson,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-04226 Filed 2-25-15; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
USCIB: 13.2/64 

QONF IBlliN'P I.Ya 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE Ml!MBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Clearance for Category III COMINT. 

USCIB 13.2/6f~ 16 May 1955. 

31 May 1955 

1. Vote sheet replies to the reference indicate approval by all 

members. 

2. The NSA member has been informally notified of this decision 

confirming the "need-to-know" of Dr. R. J. Slutz, Mr. J. W. Herbstreit, 

and Mr. R. Bateman. 

USCIB 

::. 

USCIB: 13.2/64
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                          Jul-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            Sep-30-1997                     
<CASH>                                          178
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   425
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                     326
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                966    
<PP&E>                                         1224
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1017
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3089    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           167
<BONDS>                                           0 
<COMMON>                                        147
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2923
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3089
<SALES>                                         548
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                548
<CGS>                                           303 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   303  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                876 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (627)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (627)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (627)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.05) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.05)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of Dawson Geophysical Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, L.
Decker Dawson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Dated: August 12, 2002                    /s/ L. Decker Dawson
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
August 24, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave SE Washington, DC 20590 RE: Exemption Request under Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations To whom it may concern, Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the Reform Act) and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Richard Saparito Jr, a Real Estate Broker Sales Associate , hereby applies for an exemption from the listed Federal Avi ation Regulations ("FARs") to allow Richard Saparito Jr to operate a small Unmanned Aircraft System (sUAS) under the conditions and limitations set forth in this Petition. The requested exemption would permit Richard Saparito Jr, independent real estate broker salesperson, to operate the DJI Phantom 3 to conduct aerial photography and videography for homeowners, realtors, home builders, home contractors, and/or home inspectors for real estate marketing. Richard Saparito Jr states that all s UAS flights w ill occur over private or controlled access property will do so with the property owner’s consent and knowledge and, that only people who have consented or otherwise have agreed to be in the area where videography will take place. Approval of this exempt ion would increase public awareness of UAS operations and enhance safety to aid in fulfilling the Secretary of Transportation’s (the FAA Administrator’s) responsibilities to “....establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.” Accordingly, the applicant respectfully requests that the FAA grant the requested exemption and are prepared to modify or amend any part of this request to satisfy the need for an equivalent level of safety. Please contact me a t any time if additional information is needed. Richard Saparito Jr Broker Sales Person The Van Dyk Group 500 Barnegat Boulevard North Suite 300 Barnegat, NJ 08005 609

- 698

- 6900 X 228 609

- 287

- 9847
– mobile rsaparitojr@vandykgroup.com
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                       Consent of Independent Accountants



The Board of Directors
Summit Technology, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 33-
______) on Form S-8 of Summit Technology, Inc., of our report dated March 6,
1998, except as to Note 10, which is as of March 27, 1998 and except for the
restatement referred to in Note 18, as to which the date is March 9, 1999
relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Summit Technology, Inc., and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows and related schedules for each
of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 1997, which report
appears in this current report on Form 10-K of Summit Technology, Inc., dated
March 31, 1999.


                                         /s/ KPMG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
May 18, 1999
*Tuesday, August 31, 1999*

MERIT DOCKET

99-1235.

#### Cincinnati School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 97-R-1686. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of the joint motion requesting an order reversing and vacating the decision and remanding the case to Board of Tax Appeals,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and hereby is, granted, and this cause is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals for entry of an order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are to bear them respective costs herein expended, and that a mandate be sent to the Board of Tax Appeals to carry this judgment into execution, and that a copy of this entry be certified to the Board of Tax Appeals for entry.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Exhibit24.1

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appointseach of Barry F. Schwartz, Robert K. Kretzman and Michael T. Sheehan orany of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-factand agent, with full power of substitution, for him and his name, placeand stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the REVLON,INC. (the ‘‘Corporation’’) Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December  31,  2005 (the‘‘Form 10-K’’) under the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limiting thegenerality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and onbehalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a directoror officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K andany instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or inconnection with the Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file thesame, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connectiontherewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities andExchange Commission and any applicable securities exchange orsecurities self-regulatory body, granting unto said attorneys-in-factand agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do andperform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be donein and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as hemight or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all thatsaid attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substituteor substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtuehereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed thesepresents this 1st day ofMarch, 2006.

|  | /s/ RONALD O.PERELMAN                                 RONALDO. PERELMAN |
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>

The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Winthrop
Residential Associates I, A Limited Partnership and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>      1

       
<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                  MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                            430,000
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                        0
<PP&E>                                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    860,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                   0
<BONDS>                                                           289,000
<COMMON>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                        518,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      860,000
<SALES>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                   (9,000)
<CGS>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  6,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   (36,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               (36,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      (36,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       (1.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       (1.33)
        


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50059 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RICARDO LONGORIA-ROBLEDO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-01-CR-397-ALL-WWJ

-------------------- June 19, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ricardo Longoria-Robledo appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Longoria-Robledo complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) based on his priordeportation following an aggravated felony conviction. LongoriaRobledo argues that the sentencing provision violates the Due Process Clause because it permitted the sentencing judge to find, under a preponderance of the evidence standard, a fact whichNo. 02-50059 -2- increased the statutory maximum sentence to which he otherwise would have been exposed. Longoria-Robledo thus contends that his sentence is invalid and argues that it should not exceed the two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Longoria-Robledo acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

I, Seth L. Van Voorhees, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of American Pacific Corporation (the Company), that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for   the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange   Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the   requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of   1934; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly   represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                        

|Date:  August   12, 2005 | /s/ SETH L. VAN   VOORHEES
|------------------------ | --------------------------
|                         |                           
|                         | Seth L. Van Voorhees      
|                         | Chief Financial Officer   
|                         | May 12, 2005