alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
KINDER MORGAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
        EXHIBIT 32.2 - CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
                                      2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kinder Morgan Energy
Partners, L.P. (the "Company") for the yearly period ending December 31, 2005,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  March 14, 2006
                                /s/ Kimberly A. Dang
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                Kimberly A. Dang
                                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
                                Kinder Morgan Management, LLC, the delegate of
                                Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc., the General Partner of
                                Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.
Exhibit 32.1

                               AXA FINANCIAL, INC.

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2009 of AXA Financial, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher M.
Condron, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                  /s/  Christopher M. Condron
                                  -------------------------------------
                                  Christopher M. Condron
                                  President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  March 10, 2010
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                   Consent of Independent Public Accountants

   As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this S-3 Registration Statement of our report dated January 15,
1999 included in Chittenden Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1998 and to all references to our Firm included in this
S-3 Registration Statement.

Arthur Andersen LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
June 10, 1999
FW: Flint Creek - Five Factor Analysis

Pettyjohn, Mary to:

Bates, Mike, Davis, Anthony , McCorkle, 

Mark, Rheaume, Thomas, Brown, Derrick

, Spencer, Stuart

10/01/2012 07:05 AM

Cc: Guy Donaldson, Dayana Medina, Joe Kordzi, Erik Snyder, Michael 

Feldman, Barbara Nann

From: "Pettyjohn, Mary" <PETTYJOHN@adeq.state.ar.us>

To: "Bates, Mike" <BATES@adeq.state.ar.us>, "Davis, Anthony" <DavisA@adeq.state.ar.us>, 

"McCorkle, Mark" <MAC@adeq.state.ar.us>, "Rheaume, Thomas" 

<RHEAUME@adeq.state.ar.us>, "Brown, Derrick" <brownd@adeq.state.ar.us>, "Spencer, 

Cc: Guy Donaldson/R6/USEPA/US@EPA, Dayana Medina/R6/USEPA/US@EPA, Joe 

Kordzi/R6/USEPA/US@EPA, Erik Snyder/R6/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael 

Feldman/R6/USEPA/US@EPA, Barbara Nann/R6/USEPA/US@EPA

2 attachments

Here is Flint Creek's Five-Factor Analysis for your 

viewing pleasure.

Mary

From: kpgaus@aep.com [mailto:kpgaus@aep.com]

Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 9:23 AM

To: Pettyjohn, Mary

Cc: bwmoore@aep.com; jchendricks@aep.com; 

jmmcmanus@aep.com; tbbond@aep.com; scarney@aep.com; 

cfhandley@aep.com; jjhenry@aep.com; 

anullstrom@aep.com; jjewell@trinityconsultants.com; 

mgoldstein@trinityconsultants.com

Subject: Flint Creek - Five Factor Analysis

Mary, attached is the five factor analysis for the 

Flint Creek Power Plant to support ADEQ's submittal 

of a revised Regional Haze SIP. Please call me if 

you have any questions.

Kris Gaus, QEP

American Electric Power

Air Quality Services

office: 214/777-1113

fax: 214/777-1138
Exhibit 15
November 8, 2002

C-COR.net Corp.
State College, Pennsylvania


Re:  Registration Statements on Form S-3 and Form S-8

With respect to the subject registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 2-95959,
33-27440, 33-35208, 33-66590, 333-02505, 333-30982, 333-43592, 333-49826,
333-61226, 333-64040, 333-65805 and 333-89067) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-82697,
333-90011, 333-90589, 333-32676 and 333-75888), we acknowledge our awareness of
the use therein of our report dated October 11, 2002 related to our review of
interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act"), such report
is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant, or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

/s/ KPMG LLP
---------------------------------
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**Pursuant to Section 905 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Georges Benarroch, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of Osprey Gold Corp.., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), do herebycertify, to the best of my knowledge, that:(1) the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the **three months ended March 31, 2007**, asfiled with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies, inall material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.       Date: May 10,2007 By: /s/ Georges Benarroch Georges Benarroch      Acting President &      Chief Executive Officer      And Acting Chief Financial Officer  
19
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 34 (Friday, February 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 9262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03601]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE:  10:00 a.m., Friday, February 27, 2015.

PLACE:  Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC, 
9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Surveillance, enforcement, and examinations 
matters. In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site 
at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-
5964.

Natise Allen,
Executive Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2015-03601 Filed 2-18-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
#### Wells, Appellant, vs. Burns Boiler & Manufacturing Company and another, Respondents.

*May 4*

May *21, 1907.*

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Brown county: S. D. Hastings, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Wigman, Martin £ Martin,*and oral argument by P. *S. Martin.*

For the respondents there was a brief by *Greene, Fairchild, North £ Parlcer,*attorneys, and *H. 0. Fairchild,*of counsel, and oral argument by *H. 0. Fairchild.*

*195Dodge, J.

The situation of this- plaintiff is substantially identical in all material respects with that of the plaintiff Wilcox in the accompanying case, *supra,*and the same result is reached herein for the reasons there stated.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to enter judgment in accordance with the prayer of the complaint.
·"' - .. .. 

USCIB: 9.2/13 

18 November 1954 

'f Of SEeRl!l'f FRO'fll 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE mMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

Reference: 

U.S. COMINT Effort on Chinese Conununist Communications. 

(a) USCIB 9.2/7 or 25 October 1954. 

(b) USCIB 9.2/8 of 29 October 1954. 

1. The references were approved at the lOBth (Special) Meeting 

of USCIB on Tuesday, 26 October 1954. 

2. Included tn reference (a) Wa.s a recommendation thatO 

should be notified of this action. 

3. Although certain aspects of reference (b)were reconsidered 

and changed at the l09th Meeting of USCIB on Friday, 12 November 1954, 

~ction ··d····i·····d········n····o····t········a···.f·· feet the previous········d· e?::i.sion on notification to 

L_ __ J Accordin~··m··.·.·.·.em········o·····r····a····n····d····urn······· as .·s·····e···t forth in the enclosure hereto has been sent to .. ,'"•·---.. ___ _ 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Enclosure 

CIB # 000303 of 15 Nov 1954 

USCIB: 9 .2/13 

24 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 01-23-2015 pursuantto E .0. 1352\3 

TOP SECRET FROTH 
.... ... 

CIB # 000303 

~OP S!Gil:Ei'f FROTH 15 November 1954 

MEMORANDUlii FOR THE SECRETARY ,J 

Subject: U.S. CCMINT Effort on Chinese Communist Communications. 

1. At a recent meeting, the United States Communications 

Intelligence Board expressed concern over the inadequacy of the communications intelligence now being obtained on the Chinese Communists. 

2. In order to leave no stone unturned in an attempt to 

ameliorate this situation, USCIB decided that, second only to our 

efforts against Russian communications, every possible effort must be 

directed toward solution of the Chinese Communist COMINT problem. 

3. Accordingly, USCIB directed that: 

a. All feasible pressure be exerted on the Chinese Nationalists to obtain their agreement for granting intercept base rights. 

EO 3.3(h)(2) (SIGNED) 

H. D. JONES PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 Deputy Executive Secretary, USCIB 

Enclosure with USCIB 9.2/13 dtd 18 Nov 1954 

TOP SECRET FROTI I
NO. 07-02-0008-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

MARCH 18, 2002

______________________________

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF

 BRANDY S. CAVAZOS AND ROLANDO CAVAZOS 

AND IN THE INTEREST OF K.S.C.AND M.S.C, CHILDREN

_________________________________

FROM THE 110th DISTRICT COURT OF DICKENS COUNTY;

NO. 4172; HON. JOHN R. HOLLUMS, PRESIDING

_______________________________

DISMISSAL

_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

Rolando Cavazos (Rolando) appellant, filed his notice of appeal on January 3, 2002.

Accompanying the notice was neither a filing fee of $125.00 or proof of his status as a

pauper. Consequently, this Court issued a letter, dated January 7, 2002 informing

Rolando of the defect and that the failure to cure same within ten days could result in the

dismissal of the appeal. So too was he told of his need to file a docketing statement within

the same time period. The court has not received the filing fee mentioned above, proof

enabling Rolando to continue his appeal as an indigent (as authorized by the Texas Rules

of Appellate Procedure), or the docketing statement. 
2

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

42.3 (c) due to appellant’s failure to pay the filing fee and provide a docketing statement

as previously directed by this Court.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 39 (Friday, February 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10716-10717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04219]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Parole Commission


Sunshine Act Meeting

Record of Vote of Meeting Closure

    I, J. Patricia W. Smoot, of the United States Parole Commission, 
was present at a meeting of said Commission, which started at 
approximately 10:00 a.m., on Tuesday, February 24, 2015 at the U.S. 
Parole Commission, 90 K Street NE., Third Floor, Washington, DC 20530. 
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss five original jurisdiction 
cases pursuant to 28 CFR Section 2.27. Four Commissioners were present, 
constituting a quorum when the vote to close the meeting was submitted.
    Public announcement further describing the subject matter of the 
meeting and certifications of the Acting General Counsel that this 
meeting may be closed by votes of the Commissioners present were 
submitted to the Commissioners prior to the conduct of any other 
business. Upon motion duly made, seconded, and carried, the following 
Commissioners voted that the meeting be closed: J. Patricia W. Smoot, 
Cranston Mitchell, Patricia Cushwa and Charles T. Massarone.
    In witness whereof, I make this official record of the vote taken 
to close this meeting and authorize this record to be made available to 
the public.


[[Page 10717]]


    Dated: February 24, 2015.
J. Patricia W. Smoot,
Acting Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-04219 Filed 2-25-15; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-P
---- - -

REF ID:A.67118 

1USBIIl11'al 2s, D.c. 

BPBE 

• 

CIB I 0006? 

9 Jae 1953 

'fOP fBHCllf • SIBUl&ft' lll9llfAHal Vale BPS Cl1ll' 

JIBll>BAllDUI POI THI CUIJlllAI, U.S. JR.MATICIJ: 

SUbject: '111ecl (Ul'O) Cmmmtoatian Secur1t7. 

Retermoe: CIB I 00060 dated 1 June 1953· 

1. In add1t1an to the guidance tor tbe U.S. Delegatian pro-

'Vided 1D the refermced aerlal., the tollcnd.ng mract. trma the 

f1nal t1'81'18cript ot the ldnut• ot the 86th (Speoial) USCIB ...._ ins ia f onarded tor intcmnatiaa: 

"Hr. Sbeldan referred to the lut paragraph an page 2 

ot the u.1. poaitian paper and 1111g88ted that the u.s. clelegatian ld.ght need eam gu:ldance with l'flllpect to 1Dclwl1ng 

the Preach with t.he U.l. ancl u.s. 1D a tripartite camd.tt• 

to deal vlth at.her manbera of IATO cm the :l.mpraYaaentr ot 

cipher aecuri.t7. 

".After ame diaaueaim, the Cha.inum Hid that guidance for the aallld.ttee wuld be to t.ell the Britillh that 

USCIB "111 be glad to diaouaa that proposal 11hm the 

Preach cipher qai;• 1a aat1'factory.• 

R • JCIUS 

])eputJ' BDcut :n Sacret&17 • USCIB 

iOP EE 

U. l OB Iii eclassified and approved for release 

y NSA on 06-12-2014 pursuant to 

.0. 13526
~~~----~~"----•-.•- . r 

STANDARD FOR"' NO. H REF ID:A.65817 e 

Office Memora1Jdum 

--

• UN~T~O .... §:Tj\. l;E_~~ ~.QY.ER~Mj:NT. .. T" .. ~ - • • .. - • .. "'. - -; ....... =-..-1 ·-

TO 

FROM
Exhibit 8.1



LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



The following is a list of the Registrants subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, other than certain subsidiaries that did not in the aggregate constitute a
significant subsidiary.



|                                     |  |                              
|------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Name                                 |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|QIAGEN AG                            |  | Switzerland                  
|QIAGEN AS                            |  | Norway                       
|QIAGEN GmbH                          |  | Germany                      
|QIAGEN, Inc.                         |  | California                   
|QIAGEN K.K.                          |  | Japan                        
|QIAGEN Ltd.                          |  | England                      
|QIAGEN North American Holdings, Inc. |  | California                   
|QIAGEN Instruments AG                |  | Switzerland                  
|QIAGEN Sciences, Inc.                |  | Maryland
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 5170** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. RICHARD EDWARD CABEY , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States Dis trict Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Winston

- Salem
. Thomas David Schroeder , District Judge. ( 1:09

- cr - 00413

- TDS

- 1 )

Submitted : June 30, 2011 Decided: July 13, 2011

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed b y un published per curiam opinion
.
Jonathan Leonard, LAW OFFICE OF JONATHAN LEONARD, Winston

- Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant. Ripley Rand, United States Attorney, Anand P. Ramaswamy, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Richard Edward Cabey appeals from his conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g), 924(e) (2006). Cabey pleaded guilty but reserved his right to appeal the district court ’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized from his vehicle after an investigatory stop . Finding no error, we affirm. This c ourt reviews factual findings underlying the district court’s d enial of a motion to suppress for clear error and legal conclusions de novo. United States v. Blake , 571 F.3d 331, 338 (4th Cir. 2009), cert. denied , 130 S. Ct. 1104 (2010). A factual findin g is clearly erroneous if this c ourt “on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United States v. Harvey , 532 F.3d 326, 337 (4th Cir. 2008) (internal quotation marks omitted). However, “if the district court’s account of the evidence is plausible in light of the record vi ewed in its entirety,” t he court will not reverse the district court’s finding even if it would have “decided the fact differently.” United States v. Stevenson , 396 F.3d 538, 542 (4th Cir. 2005) (internal quotation marks and alteration omi tted). In other words, when two views of the evidence are permissible, “the district court’s choice between them cannot be clearly3 erroneous.” Id. (internal quotation marks and alteration omitted). We have reviewed the transcript of the hearing on the motion to suppress, the district court’s memorandum opinion and order denying the motion, and the parties’ briefs and joint appendix. Having reviewed these materials, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying the motion to suppress.
We therefore affirm the judgment . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
REF ID:A517334 

co ~ '1 

" 

u.s. DELF.GATES 

Sta,t~ - Mr. R. F. Pacl\81"<1 - 191/2748 

DEF - Mr. William Godel - 1-53334 ( ~ lf<~ ·. h.'t-ltil. ~\)l.~kJ 

FBI - Mr. V. P. Keay (Mr. s. D. Ellis - Alternate) - 115/503 

NSA - Mr. W. F. Friedman -'60493 - Red 392 

A.rmy - Col. M. L. Sherbourn - 147/492 

Navy - Capt. Gifford Grange - 60517 

USAF - Lt. Col. John M. Anderson, USAF - 7-55646 

CIA - Mr. Frank Rowlett - 143/635 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 09-03-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
.~ 

l 

f 

REF ID:A65599 

1. .Adequate aecurl tJ tor all t.r,>es or ccamnnS cat1ona 

la one ot the aost 1.mpo?"tnnt pro?>leos to ?>e mlved ln pro- vld.108 an 1ntecrated ;;1Utary corncnntcntlons Q'l!lta1 theretore be develoJuent or a 11 types or securl ty equl pment should be aot1veq pursued. 

2. Tho devoloi:oent o: speech security e~l~nt 1 s in 

its early stages c~ to tho ~cvelo~!=!t or llternl 

typee or c~phic syst.ena. ':'he:retore, work ?Nat contlnuo under the highest priority both ror the ~her ·devel.opment or lmonn speech seCUl"lty :>r1nci:>lee and the 1nvesti6'lt.1on o! nett 'r1nc1,les nnd thalr n)?l1cat!.on to the 

cc:nrmn1cat1one ayst.en. :::owever. 1n v!.ew o! tho technolosleel d1ttlcul.t1oa involved i:i t?l.e- develotmcnt or a :>eeeh 

security eQul:xient, it •111 be several yeo.rn at l.P.ast ~ 

tore equipr.ient. m1tnble !'or very w1deS?roo4 use can be turn1shed; lll any' oaae. apeech aecurlty equ1;u=ient will not 

eot1pletely ell?!l1nate the need tor 11tcrsl test ccxmram1catlona. Theretoro, 1t 1s easentisl that oonalderable emi>!lasla t!tlould continue to ~ placed on ~e development ot 

improved 11 toral ei:i)her 87stecs tor 1nter1m use. 

~. iltbough man,y methods haft been SUGSeste4 tor the 

aOhinemct ot both speech and telet~ter eecu:r1ty, it 

1• belleve4 '118.t the devel®lns agency should be restricted 

onl.7 by the J'eQuirGOCmt that trnnllll1se1on or the 1ntelllgence be poas1~le over the c~catlons channeli p.ro'Yided 1n an lntegnted system. ... 

•· It mst be realized ~t 1Jholesale 41atr1butlon 

ot equlpaeata 1'hioh imat be caretul.17 aategmrde4 an4 t.he 

An1J-W14e ooor41Dat1on ot tbe key o.'longee neoeaa17 tar 

proper •our1t7 mkee the provialop ot aeeur!ty vi.th -.aoh 

1tem ot "o• 'HIJ:!lcat1on. oqu11D811t .i · almoet Snpoaaible taet. 

~ ... J. 

"1).:r:.. 

- -J.' J r ;j;: _ ' ' !/ ~ ·'- ..::...• :.-· ..___ ~ 

-
REF ID:A65599 

SECaEI 

,. __ 

QQ~'ll (14 Tleoembor lMO) 

e. Ol'e'!:ter flexlbllltf', ehlpler na1ntenanee an! peat. 

er eo~lt7 can ba aohle"f~ Without undua 1noreaee ln bulk 

or w1£bt b7 not 'bull.41ng all the ooaponente reqalrel tor a 

epecttlo appllcat1cm into one ult. 'lberetore, eeoarltT a..-

vloee shoul.4 bo pl'O'l'14e4 u r.ttacbnemta to. or •• un1t1H4 

ooaivoncnt s or co!'!l!!'1\U\1M. tlon eqdps-ent e.s re({uired. 'lb ... eeaurt t7 4ertaes shOUld be thO:rouehl.J' tunct1onall1' lntegftt.S nt?l tht1t CQ9USQnloat1on equipment "1th which theJ are uMI 

an4 w1 tb the oo:mmtca~Jon qatea a• a mole. However, the 

question o'!' ~~1lt•!n ~ncurl i,. ve:rt!IU8 attached 1MOUr1t7 llt\oU.14 

be ·4etemined b'!' the OJHtMtio.."'11 ~uirements ror eaotl ap..., o1t1c item ot e~uirment .. 

I •, 

..... 

.. _..-- .. 

-' 

.· ..... ~ 

· .. , ,. :-r_ 

I \ 

\ . 

;,'" .- - .. "'.-·. 1 ' . ,,.., J:.. _. I '' • 

:::,,'•_.Q: ': :~~- ;.~" ~~: "-.~: .-.:~- ~:~,t_ji 

-,
# CE2004078EN.01032304.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/323 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/323

---

(2004/C 78 E/0337)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3804/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject:   Update on use of funding from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Perugia

Subject:

In its answer to question E-0984/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Perugia had submitted projects or secured funding under the Culture 2000 programme, the Commission stated, on 30 July 2003, that the municipality had not submitted any projects by 2002. Can the Commission say if this has been the case subsequently and up to the present?

1

---

(1)  OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 200.

1

---