11164 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Notices 

Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for 

the Final Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review: Polyethylene Terephthalate 

Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET film) from India; 2012,’’ 

dated concurrently with this notice and herein 

incorporated by reference (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

3On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and 

Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic 

Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to ACCESS. The 

Web site location was changed from http://

iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The 

Final Rule changing the references to the 

Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 

(November 20, 2014). 

4These rates reflect the cash-deposit rates 

adjusted for the termination of the pre- and postshipment export financing program in foreign 

currency. See 19 CFR 351.526(a). 

issues are identified in the Appendix to 

this notice. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS).3

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov and in the 

Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the 

main Department of Commerce 

building. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

on the Internet at http://trade.gov/

enforcement/frn/index.html. The signed 

Issues and Decision Memorandum and 

electronic versions of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum are identical in 

content. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on the comments received from 

Jindal, SRF, and domestic interested 

parties Polyplex USA LLC and Flex 

USA, we made the following changes to 

our rate calculations for Jindal and SRF: 

We adjusted the cash deposit rates for 

Jindal and SRF, as necessary, to exclude 

the foreign currency denominated preand post-export financing benefits. 

Further, we revised our allocation 

calculations and adjusted the numerator 

in our subsidy rate calulations for Jindal 

with respect to the Status Holder 

Incentive Scheme (SHIS). For a 

discussion of these issues, see the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum. 

Final Results of Administrative Review 

In accordance with section 777A(e)(1) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act) and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5), we 

calculated individual ad valorem 

subsidy rates for Jindal and SRF, for the 

POR for this administrative review. 

Manufacturer/exporter 

Subsidy 

rate 

(percent) 

Jindal Poly Films Limited ............ 7.66 

SRF Limited ................................ 2.03 

Assessment and Cash Deposit 

Requirements 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(2), the Department intends to 

issue appropriate instructions to U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 15 

days after publication of the final results 

of this review. The Department will 

instruct CBP to liquidate shipments of 

subject merchandise produced and/or 

exported by Jindal and SRF, 

respectively, entered or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption from 

January 1, 2012, through December 31, 

2012, at 7.66 percent ad valorem and at 

2.03 percent ad valorem, respectively, of 

the entered value. 

The Department intends also to 

instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of 

estimated countervailing duties at the 

rate of 7.66 percent ad valorem for 

Jindal and of 2.03 4 percent ad valorem 

for SRF of the entered value on 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

produced and exported by SRF, entered, 

or withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review. We intend to instruct CBP to 

continue to collect cash deposits for 

non-reviewed companies at the 

applicable company-specific 

countervailing duty rate for the most 

recent period or the all-others rate 

established in the investigation. These 

cash deposit rates, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to an 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), 

which continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

These final results are issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: February 23, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

Scope of the Order 

III. Subsidies Valuation Information 

A. Allocation Period 

B. Benchmarks Interest Rates 

C. Denominator 

IV. Analysis of Programs 

1. Programs Determined To Be 

Countervailable 

2. Program Determined To Be Terminated 

3. Programs Determined To Be Not Used 

V. Analysis of Comments 

Comment 1: Whether There Has Been A 

Program-Wide Change for Pre-Shipment 

Export Financing in Foreign Currency 

and Adjustment of the Cash Deposit 

Rate. 

Comment 2: Whether The Department 

Wrongly Countervailed Export 

Promotion Capital Goods Scheme 

(EPCGS) Benefits That Apply To NonSubject Merchandise. 

Comment 3: Whether the Department Used 

The Wrong Numerator To Calculate The 

POR Benefit For The Status Holder 

Incentive Scheme (SHIS). 

Comment 4: Whether The Department 

Made An Error In Calculating The POR 

Benefit for the SHIS. 

Comment 5: Whether The Value Added 

Tax (VAT) And Central Sales Tax (CST) 

Refunds Under The Industrial Promotion 

Subsidy (IPS) Of The State Government 

Of Maharashtra’s (SGOM) Package 

Scheme Of Incentives (PSI) Is 

Countervailable. 

[FR Doc. 2015–04274 Filed 2–27–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is 

automatically initiating the five-year 

review (‘‘Sunset Review’’) of the 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

(‘‘AD/CVD’’) orders listed below. The 

International Trade Commission (‘‘the 

Commission’’) is publishing 

concurrently with this notice its notice 

of Institution of Five-Year Review which 

covers the same orders. 

DATES: Effective (March 1, 2015). 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Notices 11165 

1See also Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; 

Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 

39263 (July 6, 2011). 

2See section 782(b) of the Act. 

3See Certification of Factual Information To 

Import Administration During Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 

17, 2013) (‘‘Final Rule’’) (amending 19 CFR 

351.303(g)). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Department official identified in the 

Initiation of Review section below at 

AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. 

For information from the Commission 

contact Mary Messer, Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission at (202) 205–3193. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department’s procedures for the 

conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth 

in its Procedures for Conducting FiveYear (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Orders, 63 FR 13516 (March 20, 1998) 

and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005). 

Guidance on methodological or 

analytical issues relevant to the 

Department’s conduct of Sunset 

Reviews is set forth in Antidumping 

Proceedings: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final 

Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 

2012). 

Initiation of Review 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.218(c), we are initiating Sunset 

Reviews of the following antidumping 

and countervailing duty orders: 

DOC case No. ITC case No. Country Product Department contact 

A–337–804 ............. 731–TA–776 .......... Chile ....................... Certain Preserved Mushrooms (3rd 

Review).

David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

A–533–813 ............. 731–TA–778 .......... India ....................... Certain Preserved Mushrooms (3rd 

Review).

David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

A–560–802 ............. 731–TA–779 .......... Indonesia ............... Certain Preserved Mushrooms (3rd 

Review).

David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

A–475–059 ............. AA1921–167 .......... Italy ........................ Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape (4th 

Review).

David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

A–570–851 ............. 731–TA–777 .......... PRC ....................... Certain Preserved Mushrooms (3rd 

Review).

David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

A–570–891 ............. 731–TA–1059 ........ PRC ....................... Hand Trucks (2nd Review) ................ Jacqueline Arrowsmith (202) 482– 

4136. 

Filing Information 

As a courtesy, we are making 

information related to sunset 

proceedings, including copies of the 

pertinent statute and Department’s 

regulations, the Department’s schedule 

for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past 

revocations and continuations, and 

current service lists, available to the 

public on the Department’s Web site at 

the following address: ‘‘http://

enforcement.trade.gov/sunset/.’’ All 

submissions in these Sunset Reviews 

must be filed in accordance with the 

Department’s regulations regarding 

format, translation, and service of 

documents. These rules, including 

electronic filing requirements via 

Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(‘‘ACCESS’’), can be found at 19 CFR 

351.303.1

Revised Factual Information 

Requirements 

This notice serves as a reminder that 

any party submitting factual information 

in an AD/CVD proceeding must certify 

to the accuracy and completeness of that 

information.2 Parties are hereby 

reminded that revised certification 

requirements are in effect for company/ 

government officials as well as their 

representatives in all AD/CVD 

investigations or proceedings initiated 

on or after August 16, 2013.3 The 

formats for the revised certifications are 

provided at the end of the Final Rule. 

The Department intends to reject factual 

submissions if the submitting party does 

not comply with the revised 

certification requirements. 

On April 10, 2013, the Department 

published Definition of Factual 

Information and Time Limits for 

Submission of Factual Information: 

Final Rule, 78 FR 21246 (April 10, 

2013), which modified two regulations 

related to antidumping and 

countervailing duty proceedings: The 

definition of factual information (19 

CFR 351.102(b)(21)), and the time limits 

for the submission of factual 

information (19 CFR 351.301). The final 

rule identifies five categories of factual 

information in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21), 

which are summarized as follows: (i) 

Evidence submitted in response to 

questionnaires; (ii) evidence submitted 

in support of allegations; (iii) publicly 

available information to value factors 

under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure 

the adequacy of remuneration under 19 

CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed 

on the record by the Department; and (v) 

evidence other than factual information 

described in (i)–(iv). The final rule 

requires any party, when submitting 

factual information, to specify under 

which subsection of 19 CFR 

351.102(b)(21) the information is being 

submitted and, if the information is 

submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct 

factual information already on the 

record, to provide an explanation 

identifying the information already on 

the record that the factual information 

seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The 

final rule also modified 19 CFR 351.301 

so that, rather than providing general 

time limits, there are specific time limits 

based on the type of factual information 

being submitted. These modifications 

are effective for all segments initiated on 

or after May 10, 2013. Review the final 

rule, available at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/

1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to 

submitting factual information in this 

segment. To the extent that other 

regulations govern the submission of 

factual information in a segment (such 

as 19 CFR 351.218), these time limits 

will continue to be applied. 

Revised Extension of Time Limits 

Regulation 

On September 20, 2013, the 

Department modified its regulation at 19 

CFR 351.302(c) concerning the 

extension of time limits for submissions 

in antidumping and countervailing duty 

proceedings: Extension of Time Limits, 

78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013). The 

modification clarifies that parties may 

request an extension of time limits 

before a time limit established under 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
11166 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Notices 

4See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). 

1See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; 

Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 

39263 (July 6, 2011). 

part 351 of the Department’s regulations 

expires, or as otherwise specified by the 

Secretary. In general, an extension 

request will be considered untimely if it 

is filed after the time limit established 

under part 351 expires. For submissions 

which are due from multiple parties 

simultaneously, an extension request 

will be considered untimely if it is filed 

after 10:00 a.m. on the due date. Under 

certain circumstances, the Department 

may elect to specify a different time 

limit by which extension requests will 

be considered untimely for submissions 

which are due from multiple parties 

simultaneously. In such a case, the 

Department will inform parties in the 

letter or memorandum setting forth the 

deadline (including a specified time) by 

which extension requests must be filed 

to be considered timely. This 

modification also requires that an 

extension request must be made in a 

separate, stand-alone submission, and 

clarifies the circumstances under which 

the Department will grant untimelyfiled requests for the extension of time 

limits. These modifications are effective 

for all segments initiated on or after 

October 21, 2013. Review the final rule, 

available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/

pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013- 

22853.htm, prior to submitting factual 

information in these segments. 

Letters of Appearance and 

Administrative Protective Orders 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d), the 

Department will maintain and make 

available a public service list for these 

proceedings. Parties wishing to 

participate in any of these five-year 

reviews must file letters of appearance 

as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). To 

facilitate the timely preparation of the 

public service list, it is requested that 

those seeking recognition as interested 

parties to a proceeding submit an entry 

of appearance within 10 days of the 

publication of the Notice of Initiation. 

Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews 

can be very short, we urge interested 

parties who want access to proprietary 

information under administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) to file an APO 

application immediately following 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this notice of initiation. The 

Department’s regulations on submission 

of proprietary information and 

eligibility to receive access to business 

proprietary information under APO can 

be found at 19 CFR 351.304–306. 

Information Required From Interested 

Parties 

Domestic interested parties, as 

defined in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), 

and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.102(b), wishing to participate in a 

Sunset Review must respond not later 

than 15 days after the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this notice of initiation by filing a notice 

of intent to participate. The required 

contents of the notice of intent to 

participate are set forth at 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with the 

Department’s regulations, if we do not 

receive a notice of intent to participate 

from at least one domestic interested 

party by the 15-day deadline, the 

Department will automatically revoke 

the order without further review.4

If we receive an order-specific notice 

of intent to participate from a domestic 

interested party, the Department’s 

regulations provide that all parties 

wishing to participate in a Sunset 

Review must file complete substantive 

responses not later than 30 days after 

the date of publication in the Federal 

Register of this notice of initiation. The 

required contents of a substantive 

response, on an order-specific basis, are 

set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note 

that certain information requirements 

differ for respondent and domestic 

parties. Also, note that the Department’s 

information requirements are distinct 

from the Commission’s information 

requirements. Consult the Department’s 

regulations for information regarding 

the Department’s conduct of Sunset 

Reviews. Consult the Department’s 

regulations at 19 CFR part 351 for 

definitions of terms and for other 

general information concerning 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

proceedings at the Department. 

This notice of initiation is being 

published in accordance with section 

751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c). 

Dated: February 23, 2015. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2015–04300 Filed 2–27–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘the Department’’) has received 

requests to conduct administrative 

reviews of various antidumping and 

countervailing duty orders and findings 

with January anniversary dates. In 

accordance with the Department’s 

regulations, we are initiating those 

administrative reviews. 

DATES: Effective March 2, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD 

Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 

482–4735. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department has received timely 

requests, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b), for administrative reviews of 

various antidumping and countervailing 

duty orders and findings with January 

anniversary dates. 

All deadlines for the submission of 

various types of information, 

certifications, or comments or actions by 

the Department discussed below refer to 

the number of calendar days from the 

applicable starting time. 

Notice of No Sales 

If a producer or exporter named in 

this notice of initiation had no exports, 

sales, or entries during the period of 

review (‘‘POR’’), it must notify the 

Department within 30 days of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. All submissions must be filed 

electronically at http://access.trade.gov 

in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303.1

Such submissions are subject to 

verification in accordance with section 

782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’). Further, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(1)(i), 

a copy must be served on every party on 

the Department’s service list. 

Respondent Selection 

In the event the Department limits the 

number of respondents for individual 

examination for administrative reviews, 

the Department intends to select 

respondents based on U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S. 

imports during the POR. We intend to 

release the CBP data under 

Administrative Protective Order 

(‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO 

within seven days of publication of this 

initiation notice and to make our 

decision regarding respondent selection 

within 21 days of publication of this 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES