alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered November 6 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00674
- CR
ROLAND LASHUN JERNIG AN, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Tri al Court Cause No. F11
- 59314
- N



### O RDER
The Court REINSTATES the appeal. On October 22, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the clerk’s and reporter’s records had not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that : (1) appellant
desire s to pursue the appeal; (2) appellant is indigent and represented by court

- appointed counsel; (3) counsel timely requested both the clerk’s and reporter’s records; (4) Sandra Hughes and Anne Meredith are the court reporters who recorded the proceedings; (5 ) Ms. Hughes explained that she was waiting for Ms. Meredith to complete her portion of the record so that a complete record could be filed; and (6) the Dallas County District Clerk and Ms. Hughes will file their respective records within thirty days of th e October 29, 2013 hearing. We received the clerk’s record on October 30, 2013 and the reporter’s record on November 4, 2013.Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
ANCHORAGE 2011 and 2013 CO MAINTENANCE PLAN SUBMI TTAL S

Revised Volume Revision Description , Dates and Sections that EPA is Approving

Anchorage Transportation Control Program
Update to the “ Anchorage CO Maintenance Plan ” to revise the data to reflect use of the
MOVES2010 emissions model
September 20, 2011 Submittal (Adopted 7/13/11, State Effective 9/17/2011) Anchorage Transportation Control Program
A plan for the second 10

- year maintenance period: “Anchorage CO Limited Maintenance Plan”
April 22, 2013 Submittal (Adopted 2/22/13, State Effective May 8,
2013 )

Volume II Section III.B.1 Planning Process

—

Section III.B. 2. Maintenance Area Boundary

—

Section III.B.3. Nature of the CO Problem

– Causes and Trends —

— Section III.B.4: Carbon Monoxide Monitoring Program Section III.B.5. Transportation Control Strategies —

Section III.B.6 Modeling and Projections

—

Section III.B.7 Contingency Plan

—
Section III.B.8 Anchorage Emergency Episode Plan —

Section III.B.9 Assurance of Adequacy

—

— Section III.B.10 Air Quality Conformity Procedures Section III.B.11 Redesignation Request

— Section III.B.12 Limited Maintenance Plan for 2014

- 2024 Volume III 1 ( Appendi ces to Volume II,
Section III B ) Appendix III.B.1 Anchorage Assembly

Resolution No. 2011

- 133 Appendix III.B.1 Anchorage Assembly Resolution No. 2013

- 20
Appendix III.B.3: Anchorage 2007 Carbon Monoxide Emission Inventory and 2007

- 2023 Emission Projections —

Appendix III.B.6. Analysis of Probability of Complying with the NAAQS for CO in Anchorage between 2007 and 2023 —

Appendix III.B.10 Affidavit of Oral Hearing Appendix III.B.10 Affidavit of Oral Hearing

1 These documents are added to, not replacing, documents in the appendix.
EX-10.8 Amendment to the Time Warner 1996 Stock






Exhibit 10.8




AMENDMENT TO THE

TIME WARNER 1996 STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS




     1. This Amendment to the Time Warner 1996 Stock Option Plan For Non-Employee Directors (the
“Plan”) shall become effective on October 1, 2008 (the “Effective Date”).



     2. The terms “Fair Market Value,” “fair market value” and “Market Value,” as applicable, and
their respective definitions, as may be set forth in the Plan shall be amended by replacing any
such terms with “Fair Market Value” and replacing their respective definitions with the following:




“Fair Market Value” means, on a given date, (i) if there should be a public market
for the shares of Common Stock on such date, the closing sale price of the shares of
Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape, or, if the shares of
Common Stock are not listed or admitted on any national securities exchange, the
average of the per share closing bid price and per share closing asked price on such
date as quoted on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation
System (or such market in which such prices are regularly quoted) (the “NASDAQ”),
or, if no sale of shares of Common Stock shall have been reported on the New York
Stock Exchange Composite Tape or quoted on the NASDAQ on such date, then the
immediately preceding date on which sales of the shares of Common Stock have been so
reported or quoted shall be used, and (ii) if there should not be a public market
for the shares of Common Stock on such date, the Fair Market Value shall be the
value established by the Board of Directors or authorized Board committee in good
faith.



     3. This Amendment shall apply with respect to the administration of awards under the Plan for
any and all awards granted under the Plan that are outstanding on or after the Effective Date,
provided however, that this Amendment shall not amend or affect the exercise price of any stock
options granted under the Plan prior to October 1, 2008.



Date: September 10, 2008




 

TIME WARNER INC.




	 	 	 
	By:
	 	/s/ Harry L. Spencer

	 	 	 

	 	 	Harry L. Spencer

	 	 	Vice President, Global Benefits & HR Operations
. 

" 

i ~·I, - ' -

. :"' ...
Secretary Anthony Foxx US Secretary ofTransportation DOT Office ofthe Secretary 1200 NewJerseyAvenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 DC 20510-·1502
July 22, 2014

RE: Petition ofFortDodge, IA for a Two-Year Waiver from the 10-EnplanementStatute Docket-DOT-OST-2001-10682 Dear Secretary Foxx, :•., j

I write to strongly support the Fort Dodge Regional Airport's application for a two-year waiver from the 1 0-enplanement perday standard. It is clearthat the decline in service is a temporary condition, and I expect air service atFortDodge to be strong in the future. Fort Dodge Regional Airport has long provided dependable air service to Fort Dodge, supporting economic development around the region. However, in February 2014, after several months of providing inconsistent service, Great Lakes Aviation unexpectedly suspended service to Fort Dodge. Despite this situation, the airport wasjust 196 passengers short ofmeeting the 10 enplanementper day requirement over FY13. Duringthis time, Great Lakes Aviation cancelled 54 

### flights with 1,026 available seats,whichwould have easily accounted for 196 passengers. This suspension in air service will also cause Fort Dodge to fall below 10 enplanements perday for federal FY14; thus the request for a two-year waiver. In the months since the suspension, the Airport has been workinghardto find an air carrier that will give the Airport consistent and reliable service and, as you know, they are inthe final steps ofsecuring a new contract. With the new contract, 

### I have no doubtthat Fort Dodge Regional Airport 

### will meet the 

### 1 0-emplanementper day requirement, as they have done inthe past, when they averaged 35.6 enplanements perday in calendar year 2011 and 18.2 enplanements per day for 2012. I have worked with the staffatFort Dodge Regional Airport throughoutthe last few months as they navigate these changes, and they have worked hard to find the right path fonvard for the Airport. I am confidentthat with the new contract, Fort Dodge Regional will return to providing reliable service to Central Iowa.Essential Air Service at Fort Dodge has been critical tojob creation and economic development inFort Dodge and surrounding areas. I strongly urge you to grant them the waiver and allow them to get back to providing dependable air service to Fort Dodge. Sincerely,

Tom Harkin United States Senator
REF ID:A68690 ..... 29 December 1958 

Received the following packages from Mr. William 

F. Friedman: 

WFF-2S 

WFF-21 

WFF-22 

WFF-23 

WFF-24 

Envelope addressed to Mrs. Mary 

Vesper, R/D Liaison Office, NSS. 

Envelope addressed to Mrs. Mary 

Vesper, R/D Liaison Office, NSS 

Envelope addressed to Mr. L. D. 

Callima.hos, TNG-fr'!3, Ft. Meade, Md. 

Envelope addressed to NSA Records 

Depository, Ft. Meade Maryland. 

Large box addressed to Mr. Friedman, 

c/o R/D Liaison Of'f'ice, NSS. 

roved for Release b NSA on 09-09-2013 ursuantto E .0. 1352 

- --- -------------
exv10w22






EXHIBIT 10.22




LINDSAY CORPORATION

POLICY ON PAYMENT OF DIRECTOR FEES AND EXPENSES



Outside Directors who are not employees of the Company are compensated or have
expenses reimbursed as follows:



$25,000 Annual Fee as Director: Payment of $12,500 is made by check in September
and March ($25,000 total).



$16,000 Annual Fee as Chairman of Board of Directors: Payment of $8,000 is made by
check in September and March ($16,000 total) in addition to the annual fee as a
Director, if the Chairman of the Board is an outside Director; provided that the
Chairman of the Board may not also receive an additional fee for serving as Chairman
of any standing or special committee.



$8,000 Annual Fee as Chairman of the Audit Committee and $6,000 Annual Fee as
Chairman of the Compensation Committee: Payment of one-half of the fee is made by
check in September and March in addition to the annual fee as a Director.



$1,400 per day for attending meetings of the Board of Directors. This meeting fee
shall apply to meetings by telephone or video conference which are four hours or
more, and a reduced meeting fee of $800 shall apply to meetings by telephone or
video conference which are less than four hours.



$800 per day for attending separate or special committee meetings which are not on
the same day as a Board of Directors meeting, including meetings by telephone or
video conference which last less than four hours This meeting fee is for all
committee meetings on the same day and not per committee.



Lindsay will reimburse outside Directors for actual and reasonable expenses they
incur associated with travel for Lindsay meetings or other Lindsay business,
including first class commercial airfare (or travel by private plane for distances
of less than 1,000 miles if commercial air travel is difficult or inconvenient or
more than 1,000 miles if authorized or approved by the Chairman of the Board of
Directors or the Chairman of the Audit Committee), car rental, taxi, parking, meals,
tips and hotel expenses. Reimbursement for other expenses may be authorized or
approved by the Chairman of the Board of Directors or the Chairman of the Audit
Committee.



Directors who are not employees of the Company receive annual grants of restricted
stock units with an award value of $35,000 with the grant being made on the date of
the annual meeting of stockholders. The number of units awarded will equal $35,000
divided by the closing stock price on the date of grant. These restricted stock
units vest on November 1 following the date of grant.



New directors who are not employees of the Company receive a one-time grant of
restricted stock units with an award value of $35,000 with the grant being made on
the date of their first regular Board meeting as a director. The number of units
awarded will equal $35,000 divided by the closing stock price on the date of grant.
These restricted stock units vest ratably (one-third each year) on November 1 of the
next three years following the date of grant.




62
REF ID:A51734B 

MEMO ROUTING SLIP I

- _,EVER USE FOP-.,ROVALS. DISAPPROVALS, 

'CONCURREN OR SIMILAR ACTIONS 

DATF. 

3, 

REMARKS 

ORGANIZATION AN 

DD FORM 9 5 Replaces DA AGO Form 895, l Apr 48, an<1 A.FHQ I ff.I ~Q Fnrm 12,, JO Nov 47. which m1>3 be used. 

CIRCUl.ATE 

COORDINATION 

FILE 

NECESSARY 

ACTION 

NOTE AND RETURN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

3. 3 (h) (2) 

86-36/50 USC 3605 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-06-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
REF ID:A51734B 
I 

: 

I 

I 

REF ID:A51734B 

1"'*)P SECR_PT 

T 0 P 9 E e R E T 

fRCl4 : SUSLO LONDON 

TO : DIRNSA 

MSG NR: LW 681 

OTG : '2J61558z MAY 53 

SECURITY INFORMATION 

PRIORITY AG I NR: 32371 

ACT: P/P 1-4....--

INrO: V/OIR I} 

c/s 6 

113 7-1¢ 115 11 

E0'3 .. 3(h) (2) 

PL 8 6d6/ 50 USC 3605 

REUR WL 593 (AGO 2~27¢ ~ ORIG J>/Pl~..._I __ __.ISAID INFORMALLY 

TODAY THAT MSG IS BEING SENT TILTMAN SUGGESTING CONFERENCE 

BEGIN 4 OR 5 J~E•/ PROBABLE: CONFEREES WILL BE I .... ____ __. 

I lrtl..TMAN.I jrRG4 ct PHER POLICY 

BOARD. ANO A BRITISH EMBASSY REPRESENTATIVE. BRITISH ARE 

PREPARING POSITION PAPER AND HOPE TO RECEIVE U S PAPER PRIOR 

TO DEPARTURE Of DELEGATION. HOPE TO ENO CONF"ERENCf. BY 13 J .... E 

fCI NR: 14336Q (~ MAY 53) 

DATE RECD: 9'()1828z MAY 53 

TOP ~fe"~"' eeNTROL NR: 53-3237-. 

PAGE 1 Of 1 PAGE 

COPY t Of 11 COPIES - PARAPHRASE NOT REQUIRED CONSULT CRYPTOCENTER BEFORE OECLASS!fYING 

SECURITY INFeRMATION RW 

TOP SECRET
.. .. 

USCIB: 5.7/12 

28 July 1955 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Extension of USAF Liaison Arrangements with Foreign 

Governmental Activities 

The enclosure is forwarded for information. 

USCIB 

Enclosure 

USAF Memo dtd 26 July 1955. 

USCIB: 5.7/12 

SECRET 

24 

eclassified and a roved for release b NSA on 09-05-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352 
.. 

SECi!mSB.f~D:A577~ ""....... . 

DEPARTMENT OF THE Am FORCE 

Headquarters United States Air Force 

Washington 25, D. c. 

26 JUL 1955 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECtrrIVE SECRETARY, USCIB 

SUBJECT: (U) Extension of USAF Liaison Arrangements with Foreign 

Gover.mnental Activities 

l. Reference is made to USCIB Directive #12. EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

2. In accordance with Paragraph S, Section IV of the reference, 

notification is hereby made of Air E:orce intent t.o a.n e .for direct 

liaison involvin the excha.n e of Com.int 

3. Such direct exchange is considered es.sentia.l to the effective 

fulfillment of the United States I I continental air defense 

missions. 

FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF: 

(Signed) 

F" J. HARROLD 

Lt. Colonel, USAF 

Directorate of Intelligence 

Enclosure with USCIB 5.7/12 dated 28 July 1955. 

SECRET
# CE2004084EN.01086802.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/868 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/868

---

(2004/C 84 E/0961)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0752/04

by José García-Margallo y Marfil (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(11 March 2004)

Subject:   Enhancing the image of the euro and the European Union in non-member countries

Subject:

From reading a number of non-European newspapers, it becomes clear that there is a lack of understanding about the euro and its real economic, political and financial implications.

As part of the Euro campaign, is the Commission not envisaging measures targeted at professional circles and universities to improve the perception of the euro at international level and thus encourage its use?

Answer given by Mr Solbes Mira on behalf of the Commission

(5 April 2004)

(5 April 2004)

The Commission is aware that the image of the euro and the European Union in general in third countries requires a long-haul information and communication campaign. As part of its information and communication strategy ‘Framework for a Commission strategy for the euro and economic and monetary union in 2004 and beyond,’ the Commission is planning from 2004 onwards, to improve perception of the euro and its economic, political and financial implications in those countries.

In 2003 the Commission took part in the organisation of an international seminar in Santiago de Chile (‘The European experience of the euro: Building an economic and monetary union, a joint assessment by European and Latin American macroeconomists’, 20/21 October 2003) as well as consciousness-raising conferences in Athens (‘Europe, the Mediterranean and the euro’, 3/4 February 2003) and in Warsaw (‘From accession to adopting the euro’, 21 November 2003).

Via its information and communication strategy from 2004 onwards, the Commission is planning in particular to organise in third countries seminars and conferences as part of the euro campaign. Professionals and academics will be among those targeted by the strategy, which will help enhance the image of the euro and the European Union in third countries.

External information activities scheduled for 2004 include: monitoring of the media in important financial centres (United States, Japan and South-East Asia); information seminars for press and information officers in the delegations; and organisation of activities in cooperation with the Union delegations. In this connection, a cycle of five conferences is to take place in the United States at the Institute for International Economics (Washington), Harvard University, the University of California (Berkeley), the University for Chicago and the University of Texas (Austin). In South Africa two conferences will be held in Johannesburg and Cape Town. External information activities are also planned for Brazil.

---
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-14T11:51:55Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-14T11:51:56Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-14T11:51:56Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="12359">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-14T11:51:55Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<div class="ocr">eatin ,
0 W259
WITH D2AWN
AND Noi

PEISGUED
</div>

</div>
</body></html>
~ 

ix 

. ' . . . . ~ ' . - ~ ~ -

. ,,::'"· ~ : -~ -~ . ' . ' ,,.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0298 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-NM-072-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
REF ID:A523125 

l6P SEGRtl CANo•fecfoliY INF9RMATIJN 

DIWTfl July 1953 

SlHfAR!' CF POINTS 

1. Change in tit.le of Report. Orgj nal ly, conference was called tor 

purpose of considering pr:iJD.aril.y French insecurity and second.al'!ly, 

insecurit7 of certain other NATO co1llltries. 

2. Report has .following sections after Statem!llt of Problem. 

I. Assumptions as to the CCEINT capability" of the USSR. 

n. Value to the USSR of COMINT derived from the communications of 

NATO countries. 

a. Although t5 and UK views differ 8:4 to current value, both 

agree that it may be high or critical at any time. 

b. Value varies with individual countries. Latter considered 

under .:t'i ve groupings (p. 3). 

c. War-time value to USSR of diplomatic COON'? would be 

greatly increased. 

EO 3. 3 I h I I 2 I 

d. Anited forces CCMSEXJ {para. 5, p. 4). PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

III. Value to the USSR of intelligence derived .from non-CCMINT sources. 

IV.I._____ _____. Both agree value to 

USSR greater than potential value to US am UK. 

V. Security and intelligeooe factors affecting action to be taken. 

Four points to be considered. {para. 10, P• 8) 

VI. Technical factors affecting action to be taken. 

Four main points. (para. ll, 12, 13, 14, P• 9) 

VII. Outline of the proposed action. 

Three points. (paras. 15, 16, 17, p. 10) 

- TBP SECRETDeclassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-15-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
.i 

( 

REF-ID:A523125 

·1~P SECtlEl 

' 

VIll. The detailed approach and su.bsequent action. ,. 

Seven main points. (paras. 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 2.3, 24, 

on PP• 10-l.3) , '· 

IX. Conclusions. ·, 

:' • a. Three . general points. (paras. 25, 26, 2.7, P• 1.3) 

b. Action should be taken immediately-.., (para~ 28, p. 14) ~ ' ·"' 

c. Intelligence and security considerations t!>rl>~cl d!rect 

disclosure of COONT success. 

d. Technical. factors and general considerations dictate 

nature of action to be taken: 

Six points here. (para • .30 a-t, p. 14) 

e. Course of action outlined. Paras. 18-24 :meets foregoing. 

f. Preliminary steps to be taken on approval of Report: 

Five points. (para. 32a-e) 

g. Examination of NATO Comsec to continue and present 

BRlBA liaison arrangements are adequate. 

X. Rec0DD1tendations. 

a. Approve conclusions - these to supersede 1951. 

b. Program in paras. 18-24 be umertaken and in particular 

steps in para. 32 be undertaken immediately. 

TOP &EGRET
REF ID:A59236. 

DEPAR'?JAEN'f OF DEFENSE 

AmrED FORQES SECURITI AGF.JlOY 

Uashington 25,, D. Co 

13 August 1951 

AFSA ORDER NO.. 69=51 -- -==- - .,_ 

The toll.owing appointments are made~ pursuant to AFSA l4emoo 2Q...l0: 

Consultants Capto L .. F. ~;afford, USN 

Mr .. W .. p;, Friedman .. 

Chief ot AFSA School Lt .. Col .. S. Lo Patterson, USAF 

Chief <'f Training Dinsion Capt. T. s. Dyer, USN 

Adjutant General CBpto E. S. L. Goodwin, USN 

FOR i:lllE DIRE-CTOR, .AFSA1 

l>ISTHIBUTIC!i I 

S., Po COLLINS 

CoJ.one.l, Signal Corps 

Oh.'\.et ot Stat.t 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 07-24-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

•