alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004084EN.01092401.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/924 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/924

---

(2004/C 84 E/1021)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0960/04

by Jules Maaten (ELDR) to the Commission

(29 March 2004)

Subject:   Language discrimination in recruitment procedures for European institutions

Subject:

| 1. | Is the Commission aware that, in 2003, more than 700 notices of vacancy were published by European technical assistance offices, non-governmental organisations, agencies financed by the Commission and private companies which specified that only ‘native English speakers’ and ‘candidates with English mother tongue’ need apply? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the Commission aware that, in 2003, more than 700 notices of vacancy were published by European technical assistance offices, non-governmental organisations, agencies financed by the Commission and private companies which specified that only ‘native English speakers’ and ‘candidates with English mother tongue’ need apply?

| 2. | Does the Commission share the view that this constitutes manifest discrimination against persons who have ‘excellent’ or ‘very good’ knowledge of English but are not ‘native speakers’? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does the Commission share the view that this constitutes manifest discrimination against persons who have ‘excellent’ or ‘very good’ knowledge of English but are not ‘native speakers’?

| 3. | Does the Commission share the view that, this being the case, candidates whose mother tongue is not English find it more difficult to find employment in the European institutions? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Does the Commission share the view that, this being the case, candidates whose mother tongue is not English find it more difficult to find employment in the European institutions?

| 4. | Is the Commission prepared to take measures to combat such discrimination which is, in part, supported by the Commission? |
| --- | --- |

4.

Is the Commission prepared to take measures to combat such discrimination which is, in part, supported by the Commission?

Answer given by Mr Dimas on behalf of the Commission

(30 April 2004)

(30 April 2004)

Concerning the issue of notices of vacancy published by European Technical Assistance Offices, Non-Governmental Organisations, agencies financed by the Commission and private companies, the Commission would refer the Honourable Member to its joint answer to Written Questions E-0046/04 and E-0086/04 by Mr Dhaene and others (1).

1

As for recruitment in the European Institutions, the language requirements in recruitment procedures for European institutions are laid down in the Staff Regulations. Open competition notices and vacancies advertisements never specify that only native speakers of any language or candidates with a specific mother tongue may apply. Some competitions or selection procedures, such as those for linguists, may require a specific knowledge of languages; however, even in these cases there is no request for candidates to be native speakers.

---

(1)  See page 301.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8, No 333-47410) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Option Plan; Registration
Statement (Form S-8, No 333-93513) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Option Plan;
Registration Statement (Form S-8, No 333-46291) pertaining to the 1998 Stock
Option Plan; Registration Statement (Form S-8, No 33-56504) pertaining to the
1992 Stock Option Plan and the 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan;
Registration Statement (Form S-8, No 33-63600) pertaining to the 1993 Company
Stock Purchase Plan; Registration Statement (Form S-8, No 333-18995) pertaining
to the 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan; Registration Statement
(Form S-8, No 33-84136) pertaining to the 1992 Stock Option Plan; and
Registration Statement (Form S-8, No 33-92016) of The DeWolfe Companies, Inc. of
our report dated February 2, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of The DeWolfe Companies, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.



                                                       Ernst & Young, LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
March 23, 2001
Exhibit 32.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Jeffrey S. Mathiesen, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Delphax Technologies Inc.(the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 (1)  the accompanying Quarterly Report on From 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Dated: February 11, 2005 By:      /s/ Jeffrey S. Mathiesen            Jeffrey S. Mathiesen        Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the periodic report of Dawson Geophysical Company (the
"Company") Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christina W. Hagan, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d);
          and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: April 23, 2004                   /s/ Christina W. Hagan
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Executive Vice President, Treasurer,
                                        Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
Allonge to Promissory Note between the Company and J H Realty LLC



 Exhibit 10.8 
 ALLONGE TO 
 PROMISSORY NOTE 
 TO JH REALTY, LLC 
 This Allonge (the “Allonge”), dated as of March 31,
2008, attached to and forming a part of the Promissory Note dated December 31, 2007 (the “Note”), made by SPHERIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), payable to the order of J H Realty, an
Arizona limited liability company (the “Holder”), in the original principal amount of $62,000. 
  

	 	1.	The words “J H Realty” are hereby replaced with “JH Realty, LLC.” 

  

	 	2.	The Note is hereby amended to provide that it is due and payable in full on December 31, 2008. 

  

	 	3.	In all other respects, the Note is confirmed, ratified, and approved and, as amended by this Allonge, shall continue in full force and effect. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Holder have caused this Allonge to be executed and delivered by their respective duly authorized officers as of the
date and year first above written. 
  

			
	SPHERIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/    Michael Kirksey

		 	Michael Kirksey
	Its:	 	Executive Vice President and COO
	
	Accepted and agreed to:
	
	JH REALTY, LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/    Joseph Hines

		 	Joseph Hines
	Its:	 	President
1;

I!

-TOPIECIET--

AS) NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

TN®NRO STAFF March 5, 1974

II 

MEMORANDliN FOR MR. PLUMMER -

t• SUBJECT: Letter from Admiral Anderson to Mr. Colby

At the right is a feedback memorandum from Admiral Anderson

to Mr. Colby which, in part, comments on NRP management. As you

know, the PFIAB has been a strong advocate on the retention of

the NRO as a specially treated enterprise.

The memorandum cites two activities which are underway

and of which we were not aware:

a. Examination of the original directives about the

NRP;

ii b. Creation of an "omnibus" NSCID which includes

the NRP as a normal program.

We informally contacted the PFIAB Staff on this subject and

ascertained the following:

The IC Staff has prepared an "omnibus" NSCID

which includes all intelligence activities except one program.

The NRO is included.

Unclassified statements of missions and functions

•are included in the draft NSCID.

The NSCID is responsive to Mr. Colby's generally

stated desires.

e. The draft is being circulated in-house at CIA only.

CIANIMM- PUON

"AM IXICIMPI411111111111"mos°P 41P-SECRETCONTROL NO Internal 

COMES

00AP OSINCLAINONI ON IMP OST. CPCLYE-r-' :aF — PAGES
There is not full agreement in-house and objections

stem mainly from the clandestine side.

Individual members of the PFIAB are apprehensive

About the NRP becoming "normalized" in this fashion.

We believe that "normalization" of the NRP in this way

would be unwise since it would soon lead to the "normalization"

of the management structure. In addition, we have no evidence

that the "fact of" problems have been addressed in the draft

"omnibus" NSCID.

This memorandum is for your information, however, we suggest

that you personally consult with Dr. Martin or Mr. Colby on the

matter so that you may be assured that adequate recognition of

the NRO's special problems has been made. We feel that both this

prObIem and the security standardization problem studied in-house

at the CIA are "efficiency expert" approaches to a complex

situation. MEM

HAROLD S. COYLE, JR.

Lt Colonel, USAF

1

1

1

1

li CONTROL NO Internal

COPY OF COPIES

PAGEMOC -1— PAGES

S.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       80,435
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      1,343
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          10,760
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         1,366
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,904
<COMMON>                                        27,805
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              9,999
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  37,804
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            27,599
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               4,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      600
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                        439
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    63
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  23,399
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                   93,904
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       26,460
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             1,611
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       9,442
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      11,053
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          3,702
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 364
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   4,066
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1,444
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,622
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    2,622
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        1,232
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           9,548
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# CE2004084EN.01032402.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/324 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/324

---

(2004/C 84 E/0377)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0168/04

by Christopher Heaton-Harris (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(29 January 2004)

Subject:   Commission's accounting systems

Subject:

I understand the Internal Audit Service, in a report entitled ‘IAS Review of the Commission's Accounting Framework — Final Report’ dated 15 April 2003, made a number of recommendations to the Commission regarding the accounting systems.

Has the Commission implemented the prudence principle for all risk capital operations? Can the Commission confirm that the net results will be published separately in the annual financial report?

---
I 

f 

I 

REF ID:A66403 

Dr. J.a. ,_ le no 

l"8 Iutd.tatlll ~or ......... St.uq 

Prillllet• lat ..... . P.dm ... ,-, ... .. 

Deal' ... ........ . 

ID r1lpt. .t 70flll ltt\ter ot 21 Apr.ll USf. tDp...._ 111 ti& .. ,.., pahl:IA'1ou M:IJrag ......... to ., ill 

.......... 

n-- ...... ., tllmk• tor .. prwmp\ ..... ot 

..... ----- vldA, 11 !a the ..... 7Sl ..,. ..... - bH1• ...... 1ILl1 be .... &Yat.la'll• to JQtl ., .,. tdae. 

HElIO FOR RECORD: This letter is to 

ackriouledge-:flie receipt of 4 publications 

(Rego ifoo 50,198) returned to us by Dro 

van Neumann at our requesto Reference 

letter dated 3 April 1952, serial 00219. 

W.?.Friedman/eby/23 Apr 52 

Consultant/Ext. 60493 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 04-15-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

.· 

-----

_,,,;.
REF ID:A523104 

!!P'!' l!C!l!J!! ~· 

~ R>R lU'CORl) 2J. Augwat 1953 

~: Service Representation at 1953 Ult/US COllSBC CODf'erence 

l. ID • :1.D.f'ormal. coavereation Vith Jar. llave WoJ.f'aad, ASA, OD Friday 

attemoon., concerning J.c.s. 2071f./2B (1953 DX/US COMSm COJU'eronce), 1 

1-.med t!w.t tbe Services intend to recoamend to the Joint Chiefs of Sta.ti' 

tke ue1graat1on o.1' more than one Service representative to the Conference. 

the following tab.;.l&tion repreaenta the current score on members and observera 

the lervicea expect to &end to LoJldon: 

Phases 

A 

• 

AF 

Prel. 

2 

3 

0 

I 

2 

3 

l 

II 

3 

3 (may later be 

increased to ~ or 5) 

2 

2. In an earlier diacuaaion vith Captain Frost on the matter ct Service 

ol>Mrven at tb.e Colli'erence, he i.D41cated tbere would be no o'bJectiOQ to 

obaervers vitb. the Services, of course, paying their expenses. 

3. While talk1na to Wol.fand I stated that llSA p1aune4 to eand. 9 people, 

i.ncJ.u4Ua& the Bod 01' the De.leption and that most of these wu.ld retl.ll'Zl after 

tile prelimiaary diacusalcns. I stated tll&t I be.lieved. the Director would have 

no object.ion to observers .· proviMd tbere vu not an excessive number. I a.lao 

tol4 him the Director viabecl to keep tD.e U.S. party a.a lll!All as poaeible. 

4. l understand that the UlC does not exl'Oct to bav-e Service members or 

obMrver& present at tbe preliaiJ::\ary discuuiona. 

cc: C/S 

8/AStlf E: c 

SECl<ET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-15-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Lattice, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joe Noto, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     

|Date: August 14, 2012 | By: | /s/ Joe Noto                                                           
|--------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |     | Joe Noto
        Chief Financial Officer (principal accounting officer)
TO: Air Pollution Control District Board of Directors

FROM: Ron Tan

DATE: September 20, 2010

SUBJECT: Correction to the Rule 321 Board Package for the September 20, 2010 

Board Hearing

Staff docketed a Rule 321 Board Package to you on September 1, 2010. Proposed Amended 

Rule 102, Definitions, which is part of the packet, contains a typographical error.1 To correct 

this error, we have included a revised page 102 - 2 on the reverse side of this memorandum.

Revised page 102 - 2 is hereby integrated into the September 20, 2010 Rule 321 Board Package, 

Attachment 4, Proposed Amended Rule Text.

 

1 The reactive organic compound definition lists exempt compounds and assigns item numbers to 

them. The correct item number for methyl chloroform (1,1,1-trichloroethane) is “11” (not “12”).
#### Baines, Respondent, vs. City of Janesville and another, Appellants.

*April 8*

April *25, 1899.*

*Appealable order.*

An order entered in accordance with the directions and mandate of the appellate court becomes, in effect, the order of such court and is not appealable.

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Rock county: JohN R. BeNNett, Circuit Judge.

*Appeal dismissed.*

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*103For the appellants there were briefs by *Fish, Cary, TJpham <& Black*and *Huger <& Huger,*attorneys for the *Chicago c& Northwestern Hail/way Gompcmy,*and *F. 0. Burpee,*city attorney, and oral argument by *Wm. Huger, Sr.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Sutherland <& Nolan*and *B. F.*Dimuoiddie, and oral argument by *T. S. Nolan*and *Mr. Dwnwiddie.*

WiNslow; J.

This is an action in equity by a property owner on Wall street, in the city of *Janesville,*to prevent the vacation of a part of the street and the obstruction thereof by railway sheds. An application for a preliminary injunctional order based upon the complaint was denied by the circuit court, and upon appeal to this court the order denying the injunction was reversed, and the action remanded with directions “ to grant the injunction, and for further proceedings according to law.” 100 Wis. 369. - The cause being remitted to the trial court, the plaintiff moved upon the record and mandate of this court for an injunction in accordance with such mandate. Upon the hearing of this motion, the defendants appeared, and upon a joint answer and certain affidavits opposed the motion; but the court made an order enjoining the obstruction of the street, and the defendants now appeal from such order as well as from a part of a previous order refusing to stay proceedings in the action.

Upon this showing of facts, it is plain that this appeal must be dismissed. The circuit court had no option to delay or refuse to grant the injunctional order. Its duty was to obey the mandate of this court. Such order, when entered in accordance with the directions of„this court, became, in effect, the order of this court, and, upon well-settled principles, not appealable. *Fatten P. Co. v. Green Bay & M. C. Co.*93 Wis. 283; *Ean v. C., M. & St. P. R. Co.*101 Wis. 166.

*By the*Court.— Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intermagnetics General Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the year ending August 24, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael K. Burke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael K. Burke*
---------------------------
Michael K. Burke
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
October 1, 2003

* These certifications are being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed
"filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to
the liability of that Section. These certifications shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Wi-Tron, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John
      C. Lee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his
      knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Wi-Tron, Inc., and will be retained by Wi-Tron, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






/s/
        John
        C. Lee
 
 John
        C.
        Lee
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 May
        17,
        2007