alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

1.   Banyan Systems International Incorporated
     120 Flanders Road
     Westboro, Massachusetts 01581

2.   Banyan Securities Corporation
     120 Flanders Road
     Westboro, Massachusetts 01581

3.   Banyan Systems Asia-Pacific Incorporated
     120 Flanders Road
     Westboro, Massachusetts 01581

4.   Banyan Systems World Trade Incorporated
     120 Flanders Road
     Westboro, Massachusetts 01581

5.   Banyan Systems (UK) Ltd.
     Banyan House
     Northwood Park
     Gatwick Road
     Crawley, West Sussex, U.K. RH102XN

6.   Banyan Systems (Holland) B.V.
     Planetenbaan 28
     3606 AK MAARSSEN
     The Netherlands

7.   Banyan Systems (Deutschland) GmbH
     Kappellenstr. 10
     85622 Feldkirchen
     Germany

8.   Banyan Systems (France) S.A.R.L.
     11 Rue Salomon de Rothschild
     92150 Suresnes
     France

9.   Beyond Incorporated
     120 Flanders Road
     Westboro, Massachusetts 01581

10.  Banyan Systems S.A. de C.V.
     Diego Rivera 27-202
     Col. San Pablo Tepetlapa
     Mexico, D.F. 04380

11.  Banyan Systems Asia Pacific Ltd.
     1301 Harcourt House
     39 Gloucester Road
     Wanchai
     Hong Kong

12.  Banyan Systems (Taiwan), Incorporated
     120 Flanders Road
     Westboro, Massachusetts 01581

13.  Nihon Banyan Systems K.K.
     Kokusaikougyo Gobancho
     K Bldg.
     12 Gobancho, Chiyoda-ku
     Tokyo 102 Japan

14.  Banyan Systems (Korea) Co., Ltd.
     6F Eunseoung Bldg.
     601-18 Yeoksam-Dong
     Kangnam-ku
     Seoul, Korea 135-729

15.  Banyan Systems (Scandinavia) AB
     Isafjordsgatan 11
     S-164 40 Kista
     Sweden

16.  Banyan Systems do Brasil Ltda.
     Av. Roque Petrone Jr.
     999-13 Andar
     CEP 04707-910, Sao Paulo,
     SP Brasil

17.  Banyan Enterprise Networks
     P.O. Box 98910
     Sloanpark
     Bryanston 2152
     Johannesburg, South Africa

18.  Coordinate.com
     120 Flanders Road
     Westboro, MA 01581

19.  Switchboard Inc.
     115 Flanders Road
     Westboro, MA 01581
Devany, Dennis (OST) ^gT-^«sr^/f^/-z^V7-

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

JLempkal (gaol.com 

Monday, November 08, 2010 10:35 AM 

supervisor@town.massena.ny.us 

Devany, Dennis (OST); jmacaulay@twcny.rr.com; anicolaighwcny.rr.com; 

jwicke@twcny.rr.com; craiti@twcny.rr.com ^-.^ 

Massena Airport i;-4 

Novembers, 2010 

Good morning Mr. Gray, — GO 

I am writing regarding the upcoming meeting to be held this Wednesday, November 10, concerning the 

Town Council's decision as to which airline will provide service from the Massena International Airport 

to outside destinations. 

I am hoping that you will continue to allow Cape Air to provide the service between Albany and 

Massena as it is a vital service for those from Massena traveling to anywhere in the greater Capital 

District area and for many of those who wish to continue their flight south to New York City and other 

destinations around the country. 

I especially ask your consideration in light of the fact that Gulfstream has recently filed for bankruptcy. 

An airline that does not seem financially stable should not be brought in to take the place of a company 

that is providing an excellent service itself This financial instability also leads me to believe that the 

cost to fly on Gulfstream will be considerably higher than what we now pay on Cape Air. 

My daughter, and other girls from around the country, travel on Cape Air from Albany to the Holy 

Name of Jesus Academy in Massena. We have always found the Cape Air staff very willing to 

accommodate us (even going above and beyond the call of duty in several instances), very friendly, and 

their prices very reasonable. The flight schedule is also convenient. If we did not have this Albany 

service, many of the girls would be forced to fly into Logan Airport in Boston which would be much 

more confusing for a young girl, not to mention the added time to their flight and expense. 

Thank you so much for your consideration! 

Sincerely, 

Joan K. Lempka 

Millbrook, New York 

845-677-3847 

I
• 

......... ,.1,, 

COJ~Ymi'W59B~ 

• 

24 

USCIB: 13 .3/9 HA:NBLE VIA CeM!if.f Ct!AMMEL~ eMLY 

14 July 1955 

CONPlBBN'f IAL 

MEM:ORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Indoctrination for Access to COMINT. 

Reference: . USCIB 13.3/6 dated 10 June 1955. 

This notice constitutes Amendment #3 to the reference. It is 

requested that Enclosure 2 thereto be amended accordingly: 

Add: MORSE, True D. - Department of Agriculture 

USCIB: 13 .3/9 

SIVERSON, Elaine C. - White House 

-~~,.~·f.:1.·1 ....;a,,/ 

~~~l JONES 

Acting Execu ~ Secretary, USCIB 

I!Mml:d!i YIA SCMIN'l' 01tANNmB ONL¥ 

COft.'FfDEN'f'IAL 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-04-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40638

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALDO LEAL,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-97-CR-265-1

- - - - - - - - - -

December 1, 1998

Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Aldo Leal, whose true name is Eliseo Cruz Godinez, appeals

his sentence following his guilty plea conviction for possession

with intent to distribute marijuana. We have reviewed the

record, the presentence report, and the briefs of the parties and

AFFIRM the sentence imposed by the district court.

The Government’s motion seeking this court to compel Leal to

supplement the record with the transcript of his rearraignment

hearing is DENIED as UNNECESSARY. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(3). 
No. 98-40638

-2-

Leal does not rely on any admissions at rearraignment to support

his arguments, nor did he do so in the district court.

 Leal argues that the district court clearly erred in failing

to decrease his offense level for his minor or minimal role in

the offense under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. Leal has failed to sustain

his burden of demonstrating that he was entitled to a mitigatingrole reduction. See United States v. Zuniga, 18 F.3d 1254, 1261

(5th Cir. 1994). He has not shown that there are other

participants who were more culpable than he or that he was less

culpable than the average drug transporter. See § 3B1.2,

comment. (nn.1-3); United States v. Buenrostro, 868 F.2d 135, 138

(5th Cir. 1989).

Leal argues that the district court erred in finding that he

obstructed justice and in applying U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 because his

use of an alias did not significantly impede the investigation of

the instant offense. Leal concedes that he provided false

information to the magistrate judge during arraignment and to the

district court judge when he entered his guilty plea. This

conduct was sufficient to support the enhancement under § 3C1.1,

comment. (n.3(f)). “[T]he use of a false name before a judge or

magistrate merits enhancement without a showing of significant

hindrance” of the investigation or prosecution. United States v.

McDonald, 964 F.2d 390, 392-93 (5th Cir. 1992); United States v.

Montano-Silva, 15 F.3d 52, 53 (5th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-23-1997
<CASH>                                           9,347
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,476
<ALLOWANCES>                                       287
<INVENTORY>                                     28,553
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,792
<PP&E>                                          58,671
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,485
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 118,393
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,389
<BONDS>                                         29,008
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,272
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,974
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   118,393
<SALES>                                         43,235
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,200
<CGS>                                           27,417
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,417
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,012
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,045
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,726
<INCOME-TAX>                                       673
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,053
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,053
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1468

FRANK SCOTT DABNEY; KATHRYN HARRELLE DABNEY,

 Debtors – Appellants,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, NA; SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING; BANK OF 

NEW YORK MELLON; SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC,

 Defendants – Appellees,

and

JAMES M. WYMAN,

 Trustee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (2:19-cv-03225-BHH)

Submitted: October 28, 2022 Decided: December 27, 2022

Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Robert B. Varnado, VARNADO LAW FIRM, LLC, Charleston, South 

Carolina, for Appellants. Nathan J. Taylor, MCGUIREWOODS LLP, Charlotte, North 

Carolina, for Appellees Bank of America, N.A. and Bank of New York Mellon. Graham 

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1468 Doc: 50 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Mitchell, NELSON MULLINS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee Specialized Loan 

Servicing, LLC. Damon C. Wlodarczyk, RILEY POPE & LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South 

Carolina, for Appellee Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1468 Doc: 50 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Frank and Kathryn Dabney appeal the district court’s order affirming a bankruptcycourt order. The bankruptcy court granted the joint motion for summary judgment filed by 

Defendants Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing and Bank of New York Mellon and the joint 

motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC and 

Bank of America, N.A.

We have reviewed the record and find no error in the bankruptcy court’s decision. 

See In re Frushour, 433 F.3d 393, 398 (4th Cir. 2005) (noting that, in an appeal from the 

district court sitting as an appellate court from a bankruptcy court, we “review directly the 

bankruptcy court’s decision”). Accordingly, we affirm. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1468 Doc: 50 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 10


EXHIBIT 10.1

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT

By and Between Holloman Energy Corporation and 

Holloman Corporation




WHEREAS, Holloman Corporation (“Holloman”), an affiliated company, has contributed management advice, industry expertise, engineering services, personnel, North American travel expenses, office support and other valuable assistance, at no charge to Holloman Energy Corporation (the “Company”); and 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to maintain the benefit of such services from Holloman and to provide compensation for such services,

NOW THEREFORE, effective September 1, 2008, the Company and Holloman agree as follows:

1.

In consideration for the payment of $50,000 each month, Holloman will provide the following to the Company:

·

Executive consultation, industry expertise and management advice

·

Engineering and geological services support (to the extent available using Holloman’s in-house resources and without acquiring 3rd party expertise)

·

Reasonable office space and central files support

·

Accounting, software and operations services on a limited basis

·

Secretarial service, word processing, answering service, office equipment, telephone, fax, email, office supplies, postage and courier charges on a limited basis

·

The expenses associated with US domestic and Canadian travel, lodging and other miscellaneous expenses incurred by Holloman’s personnel in connection with the performance of the support services under this Agreement

2.

The monthly consideration earned by Holloman shall be payable in the restricted common stock of the Company. Monthly management and support services fees shall be converted to the Company’s stock at the average closing price of the stock for the last 10 trading-days of the applicable monthly billing period. Delivery of the Company’s share certificates in payment of the management and support services fees to be made once each fiscal quarter, within 30 days following the close of that fiscal quarter.

3.

Either party may terminate this Agreement on 30 days notice to the other party. 

4.

This Agreement contains the entire agreement among the parties with respect to the matters contained herein. Any dispute relating to this Agreement will be settled through binding arbitration in Houston, Texas in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association.




DATED: September 1, 2008




AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:

		
	HOLLOMAN ENERGY CORPORATION


	 
	 

	By:  

	/s/ GRANT PETERSEN


	 
	Grant Petersen, President


	 
	 

	 
	 

	HOLLOMAN ENERGY CORPORATION


	 
	 

	By:  

	/s/ MARK STEVENSON


	 
	Mark Petersen, President
-· 

USCIB: 5.2/103 • 

'f'OP Si!iSR:IR .. U.S. E¥.E8 9NLI 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MD!BERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Tentative Minutes. 

~ 

HtcHBHi 11I:. 6EJIM SHANHEL8 9HLI . . 

27 JuJ.y 1955 

l. Attached is a copy ot the tentative minutes tor the 11 ?t.h 

Meeting ot USCIB. Please advise the $ecretary it &l\Y' Qhanges are 

·desired. 

2. In the event there is no objection to these minutes on the 

part of USCIB members by 10 August 1955 they will be considered 

approved. 

Enclosure 

1 cow ot Tentative Minutes, 

ll?t.h Meeting of USCIB. 

USCIB: 5. 2/103 

1 OP SE:.CRET 

USCIB 

eclassifi ed and a roved for release b NSA on 11-20-2014 ursuant to E .0. 1352 

24 
• 

eoNFIB!!iN'l!Ali - e.s. EH5 ONLY 

ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH MEETOO 

OF THE 

UNITED STATES COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE BOARD 

Mr. Allen W. Dulles, Chairman 

PRESENT: 

~: 

DEFENSE: 

NSA: 

-

ARMY: 

NAVY: 

AIR FORCE: 

Q!!: 

ACTG. EXEC. SECY. : 

SECRErARIAT: 

ALSO PRF.SENT: 

STATE: 

DEFENSE: 

!!§!: 

Mr. W. Park Amstrong, Jr. 

Mr. William H. Godel 

(for General Graves B. Erskine, USMC (Ret.)) 

Mr. Victor P. Keay 

{for Mr. L. v. Boardman) 

Lt. General Ralph J. Canine, USA 

Major General Robert A. Schow 

(tor Major General Arthur G. Trudeau) 

Rear Admiral Carl F. Espe 

Major General John B. Samford 

Mr. Huntington D. Sheldon 

Mr. H. D. Jones 

Lt. Colonel Henry C. Simmons, USAF 

Mrs. Daphne O. Tucker 

Mr. T. Achilles Polyzoides 

Mr. Robert G. Walker 

Mr. Philip J. Patton 

Major General John B. Ackerman, USAF 

Captain Jack S. Holtwick, Jr., USN 

Lt. Commander Patil J. Karl, Jr., USN 

Mr. Benson K. Buffham. 

COP..'FIDE}\'T~'A L 
eE>HPIBJ!Jft'Itii • lf .5. JlHS OlfflY 

!!!I= 

!!!!= 

AIR FORCE: 

£!!: 

OGA 

Major General Har17 Reic;helderter 

Lt. Colonel Richard Letters 

Major Arnie L, Millican 

Commander Frederick E. Welden 

Captain Allen T. Miller 

I :: :::=· Jr. 

Mr. Frank B. Rowlett 

I 

COMMI'rrEE CHAIRMAN: Major William R •. Culmer,. USA (SF.CCCII) 

The ll ?t.h Meeting ot the United ~t.at~s C~ications Intelligence 

Board was held in the Director's Conference ROam, Administration 

Building,, Central Intelligence Agenq,, at 14.30,, 'l'uesdq, 12 July 1955. 

- 2 -

CONflfD&'\"ftAL 
CON1ID!ITnL - 6.S. Em aft! 

SUBJECT NlJolBER 

USCIB: 5.2/102 

Subject: 

Itm 1 of the Ag4111da tor the "11 ?t.h Meeting of ,.1B:IB, 

held on 12 . .Juq·'l955. 

Approval ot~r Pinal Minutes ot the· 115th and llltth 

Meetings and BXeautive S~aion held· on 20 Mq 1955._ ~ - '·~ -

The C~ (Mr. Dullea) :.-ked it there ~e any objection. to th4' 

subject minutes. · 

There-were no objections. 

DECISION: (12 July 1955) USCIB approved ~t1'911t change the final 

minutes of the 115th and 116th m•et1ngs and !Pcutive Seaa~on held on 

20 Mq 1955, 'i' ' . 

USCIB: 5.2/102 • 3 -

COfttl'FfDENTl-A L
7
8
I-~ , -.. -·= ·- ·~ ~ .. ----- ~ --IIBF ~ID ;As2 2 9·99-~ --. -~- -- ~--- --. -.:.,, 

;~--·· 

SECRET 

sEe'HftlT\' IHF6ftMM'l8N i:.'U~LO/ 429 

l October 19~3 

Canadian Representative at COt$iC Conterenoe 

l.. The Direotor, 1~~. haa 1ntormei! .me t.n.at h• 

baa JlQ ob:•cti~ :o the ~· ... nadian representative I .. observing the e.nglneerlnc and opera !ona~ .P~.ses 11;1 the .t'lrthooclng u .. a.-u,,;r.. 

COlJ.LJEO oon:rere...'loe when the tollowins equipments are 

u.uder oons!der;,ition: 

. J\li'$A..lf 7 . U-dA!f. 47 .t.F~U 4'7B ~AM )6 

AF~ Dl7 

A.F.:JU1 499 

Afb_:iJ.J 9 Ar~l i;· 

U-wAY D804 

Ard.AU D806 

AP5AM D808 

A!".lA.."t 500 

iJSll. D50) 

~L 86-36/50 USC 3605 

2. '!'he ec;.u!pcents listed above are\the extent 

of U.S .. diaclosure.s to Canada to data, ant! the 

Dtreot!lr, NSA 4oea not teol it proper to \extend release ot information ooucern!ns other equiplllents to Canada through L-~~~~~~~~~~~ 

). ttr. W • P. lriedma.n, Ohair.man of tho u.s. 

Delegation to the oonterenoe, haa 'been int'ot•med or 

the above. 

B. PULLING 

Colonel 1 UB.AJ' 

senior u.s. Liaison 01't1cer 

I :<: ,. 1 < J:11J•-~ h,1",)+ '-} {_,· • "" • - JJ • ""· • ~- '- .;;;;} o -- ~ I 

socr~tbry, Cypher 

Policy Board 

oo: DD 

8EORET 

"'BECORIH llVfflftMAffaNDeclassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-21-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 41 (Tuesday, March 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 11387]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04329]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 41 / Tuesday, March 3, 2015 / 
Notices

[[Page 11387]]



JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Hearing of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules of 
Appellate Procedure; Federal Register Citation of Previous 
Announcements: 79 FR 48250 and 79 FR 72702.

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on 
Rules of Appellate Procedure.

ACTION: Revised Notice of Proposed Amendments and Open Hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Please note:  The public hearing on the amendments to the 
Appellate Rules and Forms previously scheduled in Washington, DC for 
February 17, 2015, was canceled due to weather conditions. That 
public hearing has been rescheduled for March 6, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. 
in the Mecham Center of the Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary 
Building, One Columbus Circle NE., Washington, DC 20544.

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Rules of Appellate Procedure has 
proposed amendments to the following rules and forms:

    Appellate Rules 4, 5, 21, 25, 26, 27, 28.1, 29, 32, 35, and 40, 
and Forms 1, 5, 6, and New Form 7.

Written comments and suggestions with respect to the proposed 
amendments were accepted from August 15, 2014 through February 17, 
2015. In accordance with established procedures, all comments submitted 
are available for public inspection and can be found along with the 
text of the proposed rules amendments and the accompanying Committee 
Notes at the United States Federal Courts' Web site at http://www.uscourts.gov/rulesandpolicies/rules/proposed-amendments.aspx.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Secretary, 
Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference 
of the United States, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One 
Columbus Circle NE., Suite 7-240, Washington, DC 20544, Telephone (202) 
502-1820.

    Dated: February 25, 2015.
Julie Wilson,
Attorney Advisor, Rules Committee Support.
[FR Doc. 2015-04329 Filed 3-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
# f'AA- 2.0 10-1

# 2.0

# 7

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted 

### Date Response i'\:l1iOlllll Uusincs,> Aircraft Assorialioll Eli Colti 

# J/5/(() .- Rl'~iolllll Airiim' Assodalion Dllve LoHcn'r 

# 3/sJ/D ~ Aircraft Owners & Pilots Assochltion Robert Hackman 

## 3Lr:1 V 

# - ATA M Lopez 

# 3/r; /0 ~
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Unified Grocers, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended April 3,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alfred A. Plamann, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
for the periods presented in the Report.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 14, 2010



/s/    ALFRED A.
PLAMANNAlfred A. PlamannPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.