alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004088EN.01050201.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/502 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/502

---

(2004/C 88 E/0513)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0449/04

by Charles Tannock (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(23 February 2004)

Subject:   Monolithic rock-hewn churches in Lilibela, Ethiopia

Subject:

The collection of 11th century monolithic rock-hewn churches in Lalibela, Ethiopia are a remarkable and unique treasure. Sadly the lack of resources to invest in the preservation of them is leading to a rapid and incipient decay of these priceless and unique buildings.

Is it true that the EU, in partnership with the UN, made a commitment to invest in the preservation of these churches in 2000? If so, where has the money been spent, and how much of a budget has been devoted to this worthy project?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(6 April 2004)

(6 April 2004)

The Commission has decided to help with the preservation and conservation of the Lalibela churches. A Financing Agreement for an amount of EUR 9 100 000 was signed in May 2002. The project provides, mainly, for the erection of new shelters for the churches. These shelters, which will replace the existing ones, will give improved protection to the churches until a comprehensive conservation programme is designed and implemented.

This project complements earlier activities financed by the Commission. These activities comprised the design of the shelters and the recording of cultural treasures.

The Commission has co-operated with the United Nations (UN) on this, notably in the past for the preparation of the international architectural competition for the design of the shelters.

The implementation of the project can be summarised as follows:

| — | an open international tender was published in July 2002 for the selection of a contractor for the construction of the shelters. The tender had to be cancelled as no offers were submitted; |
| --- | --- |

—

an open international tender was published in July 2002 for the selection of a contractor for the construction of the shelters. The tender had to be cancelled as no offers were submitted;

| — | the tender will be re-launched following in-depth discussions with the Ethiopian authorities to identify the reasons for the negative result of the first tender. |
| --- | --- |

—

the tender will be re-launched following in-depth discussions with the Ethiopian authorities to identify the reasons for the negative result of the first tender.

---
NRO Opens New Website for Children

17 December 2002

The NRO has a new website called NROjr.gov. This new website is designed to engage young 

children in the wonders of science, math and space in a fun and interactive manner. NROjr.gov 

contains four categories of activities: Art, Music, Stories and Games. For more information, 

contact the NRO Office of Corporate Communications at (703) 808-1015.

http://www.nrojr.gov
p.1 

OAR Box 1778 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

258) IV-C-4 

Docket Number: 

A-90-06 

Printed 10/28/2008 9:51:03 AM Sheet 258 of 276 
P.2 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY iv-C-4 

SEP 2 y 1991 

Honorable Clarence E. Miller 

House of Representatives 

Washington, D.C. 20515 

Dear Mr. Miller: 

lilULJLJjJ'Iii 

I -

 f OCT 2 I 1991 ': 

This is in response to your August 23, 1991 letter regarding 

the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) interpretation of 

the definition of "repowering." Section 402(12) of the Clean Air 

Act Amendments of 1990 defines repowering as the "replacement of 

an existing coal-fired boiler" with one of several specified 

clean coal technologies. The definition also includes, as 

qualifying technologies, other technologies which are derivatives 

of "one or more of the [specified] technologies, and any other 

technology capable of controlling multiple combustion emissions 

simultaneously with improved boiler or generation efficiency and 

with significantly greater waste reduction relative to the 

performance of technology in widespread commercial use." As you 

have correctly pointed out, this definition, as written, could be 

interpreted as limiting technologies which would be considered 

repowering projects to those that only involve the replacement or 

substantial modification of the boiler. 

As part of the rulemaking process, EPA is currently taking 

comments on its proposal to amend regulations implementing new 

source requirements governing modifications at electric utility 

generating units. The proposed rule incorporates the statutory 

definition of repowering without change. Your comments are being 

given careful consideration, and EPA will be addressing this 

issue in the final rulemaking. 

I appreciate this opportunity to be of service and trust 

that this information will be helpful to you. 

Sincerely, 

/a/ Michael H. Shapiro (for) 

William G. Rosenberg 

eOMCURAENCES
Dismiss and Opinion Filed June 9 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 22

- 00179

- CV

IN RE: ORDER FOR FORECLOSURE CONCERNING 2112 BRENHAM DRIVE MCKINNEY, TX 75072 UNDER TEX. R. CIV. PROC. 736 AND FUTING YU
On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219

- 02818

- 2021

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before J ustices Myers, Carlyle, and Goldstein

Opinion by Justice Myers This is an appeal from the trial court’s order granting appellee Hidden Creek
Community Association, Inc.’s application
, under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure

736 , for an order to proceed with a foreclosure sale of appellant Futing Yu’s

property

. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 736.1, 736.8. Because an order granting an application
under rule 736 is not an appealable order, see id. 736.8(c), we questioned our
jurisdiction over the appeal . Although we gave appellant an opportunity to show
cause why the appeal should not be dismissed and cautioned that failure to respond
by April 11, 2022 could result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice,
appellant has not responded. Accordingly, on the record b ef ore us, we dismiss the– 2

–

appeal. See id. ; see also Grant

- Brooks v. FV

- 1, Inc. , 176 S.W.3d 933, 933 (Tex.
App.

— Dallas 2005, pet. denied) (granting
, on jurisdictional grounds, appellee’s
motion to dismiss appeal from order granting rule 736 application ).

220179f.p05 /Lana Myers/ / LANA MYERS JUSTICE– 3

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN RE: ORDER FOR FORECLOSURE CONCERNING 2112 BRENHAM DRIVE MCKINNEY, TX 75072 UNDER TEX. R. CIV. PROC. 736 AND FUTING YU

No. 05

- 22

- 00179

- CV On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219

- 0281 8

- 2021. Opinion delivered by Justice Myers, Justices Carlyle and Goldstein participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered this 9 th day of June 2022.
# CE2004084EN.01050901.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/509 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/509

---

(2004/C 84 E/0587)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3852/03

by Roberto Bigliardo (UEN) to the Commission

(16 December 2003)

Subject:   Appointments and transparency in the Commission

Subject:

How many members of the Commissioners' private offices have been appointed to posts in Commission departments with functions and/or grades that are senior to those they previously held?

Can the Commission also show that the appointments were based on merit rather than the now traditional practice of finding important posts for the large number of staff employed in the private offices of the President and Commissioners at the end of each term of office?

Answer given by Mr Kinnock on behalf of the Commission

(12 March 2004)

(12 March 2004)

The Commission would inform the Honourable Member that, to date during its period of office, 25 officials have been assigned to more senior posts — in terms of duties and/or grade — in other departments after a period of secondment in a Commissioner's Cabinet.

Of these 25 officials:

| — | 4 were appointed Director-General or Deputy Director-General; |
| --- | --- |

—

4 were appointed Director-General or Deputy Director-General;

| — | 7 were appointed Director; |
| --- | --- |

—

7 were appointed Director;

| — | 14 were appointed Head of Unit and, of these:






  — | 6 were appointed Head of Unit at the same grade; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

14 were appointed Head of Unit and, of these:

—

6 were appointed Head of Unit at the same grade;

| — | 3 were appointed Head of Unit at a higher grade (A3); |
| --- | --- |

—

3 were appointed Head of Unit at a higher grade (A3);

| — | 5, who had already been Heads of Unit in the past, were given a higher grade (A3). |
| --- | --- |

—

5, who had already been Heads of Unit in the past, were given a higher grade (A3).

Summary table — Officials promoted after a period of secondment to a Member's private office

| Initial grade | Grade in new post | Promotion in terms of duties | Promotion in terms of grade |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| A2 | Al | 4 | 4 |
| A3 | A2 | 7 | 7 |
| A4 | A3 | 3 | (1) 8 |
| A4 | A4 | 4 | 0 |
| A5 | A5 | 2 | 0 |

Initial grade

Grade in new post

Promotion in terms of duties

Promotion in terms of grade

A2

Al

4

4

A3

A2

7

7

A4

A3

3

(1) 8

1

A4

A4

4

0

A5

A5

2

0

These appointments complied with all the rules in force with regard to promotions. The same standard procedures for promotion which apply to all other members of staff were scrupulously followed.

---

(1)  Three of whom were also given a promotion in terms of duties.

1

---
... 

H,AI CORRCY roR ADDITION TO DISTRIBUTION, PLS DESTROY ALL OTHERS 

ROUTINE 

TOP SEGRET AGI NR: ¢11-782 

f'ROM 0 

0 

TO • • 

INF'O • • 

MSG NR: 

DTG • • 

e 

INF'O: P/P 1-4 

V/DtH 5 

CIS 6 

o;:s 1 

A•1 8-1 ~ 

EXEC SECY USCIB 

CAPTAIN RUF'US L TAYLOR, USN 

SUSLO, LONDON 

1~5 12 

S/ASST 13 

DIRNSA 

WL 29.f 5 E03.3(h) (2) 

PL 8~~36/50 USC 3605 

121739.fZ APR 5!J 

PLEASE PASS THE F'OLL<MING f"ROM THE CHAURMAN, USC.lBTO THE 

CHAIRMAN, LSIB. 

n 1 o OVER THE PAST f'EW Y;.:E::A~Ft=S~B=O~T:_::H:__::TH:.::E:.....:U:..=.•.=S.!... -=..::..=-..!.!.!!:=--=~lt-.!.~-----, 

ESTABLISHED INDEPENDENT 

WITHIN THE SCOPE Of' APPENDIX "P" THE Uf:USA AGREEMENT. IN RECENT MONTHS IT HAS BECOME CLEAR THAT SOtclf. EXTENSION 

Of' THOSE ARRANGEMENTS WOULD PROVE BENEF' IC I AL TO OUP. f 1UTUAL Ef' A• 

f'ORT IN THE COMINT f'IELD AMO CERTAIN SUGGESTIONS TCA\'/\RD THAT 

OBJECTIVE HAVE BEEN OF'f'ERED. 

2. OUR BOARD IS Of' THE OPINION THAT, RATH£R THAN APPROVE REQUESTS FOR EXTENSION Of' THE SEVERAL EXISTING ARRANGEMENTS, 

THIS MSG RELAYED TO LSIB UNDER TDTG 12199.f2Z APR 54 

DATE RECD: 121924Z APR 54 DC/CRD RW 

TOP SEGRe·r CONTROL NR: 54-1 -¢~ 219 

PAGE 1 Of' 2 PAGES 

COPY 13 Of' 13 COPIES 

PARAPHRASE NOT REQUIRED CONSULT CRYPTOCENTER BEF'ORE DECLASSIF'YING 
.. 

EO. 3. 3 ( h) ( 2) 

P4 S6~36/50 USC 3605 

MSG NR: WL 2¢5 

PERHAPS THE TIME HAS COME FOR REPRESENTATIVES OF" BOTH USCIB 

AND LSIB TO DISCUSS THE BROAD PROBLEM Of' U.S .. ANDU .. K 

AS YOU KNOii, 

SUCH A DISCUSSION WOULD t«CESSARILY HAVE TO BE LIHITEO\TO 

COMINT, INASMUCH AS ELINT IS NOT WITHIN THE PURVlf.:W Of' USCIB. 

3. If' YOUR BOARD SHOULD BE FAVORABLY DISPOSED T<MARD A REVIEW 

OF OUR __ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~__. 

I SHOULD LIKE TO PROPOSE THAT THE DIRECTOR, GCHQ AND DIRECTOR, 

NSA, UNDERTAKE TO PREPARE A MUTUALLY ACCEPTABLE AGENDA FOR A 

CONFERENCE ON THIS SUBJECT AND TO WORK OUT THE DETAILS OF" TIME 

AND LOCATION. Tt£ AGENDA WOULD, Of' COURSE, BE RErERRED TO EACH 

BOARD FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONVENING THE ACTUAL CONFERENCE." 

A FORMAL SIGNED COPY IS BEING PLACED IN THE MAIL THIS DATE 

TOP SEGRET CONTROL NR: 54-1--1219 

PAGE 2 OF' 2 PAGES 

COPY /3 OF' 13 COPIES 

TOP SECRET
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: ADOPTION OF K.B.

PETITION OF: D.O. :

:

:

:

: No. 121 WAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN RE: ADOPTION OF N.M.

PETITION OF: D.O. :

:

:

:

: No. 122 WAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4th day of June, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Filed by sedaredgar.com - Trans-Orient Petroleum Ltd. - Exhibit 4.4






TRANS-ORIENT PETROLEUM LTD. 
SHARE OPTION PLAN

March 14, 2008

OPTION COMMITMENT 

Notice is hereby given that, effective this 14th day
of March, 2008 (the “Effective Date”) TRANS-ORIENT PETROLEUM LTD. (the
“Company”) has granted to Garth Johnson, an Option to acquire 500,000 Common
Shares (“Optioned Shares”) up to 5:00 p.m. Pacific time on the 14th
day of March, 2013 (the “Expiry Date”) at a Exercise Price of US$0.50 per share.
Optioned Shares may be acquired as follows: 

	 	(a) 	
      1/3 of the total number of Optioned Shares granted will
      vest six months after the Effective Date;

	 	 	 
	 	(b) 	
      a further 1/3 of the total number of Optioned Shares
      granted will vest one year after the Effective Date; and

	 	 	 
	 	(c) 	
      the remaining 1/3 of the total number of Optioned Shares
      granted will vest eighteen months after the Effective
  Date.



In the event that the Company achieves Tier 1 status on the TSX
Venture Exchange, the Company will grant to Garth Johnson an additional option
to acquire 500,000 Common Shares (“Additional Optioned Shares”) exercisable at
the market price on the date the Additional Optioned Shares are granted. The
grant of the Additional Optioned Shares will be made subject to the terms and
conditions of the Company’s Share Option Plan and evidenced by an Option
Commitment. 

The grant of the Optioned Shares evidenced hereby is made
subject to the terms and conditions of the Company’s Share Option Plan, the
terms and conditions of which are hereby incorporated in this Option Commitment.


To exercise your Option, deliver to the Company at its then
principal business office, a written notice specifying the number of Optioned
Shares you wish to acquire, together with cash or a certified cheque payable to
the Company for the aggregate Exercise Price. A certificate for the Optioned
Shares so acquired will be issued by the transfer agent as soon as practicable
thereafter and will bear a legend stipulating any resale restrictions required
under applicable securities laws. 

 

TRANS-ORIENT PETROLEUM LTD. 


/s/Garth
Johnson                                                                     

President 




- 2 - 

I hereby acknowledge receipt of a copy of the Plan and agree to
be bound by the terms of the Plan. This commitment supersedes any prior Option
or commitment made to me. 

OPTIONEE 

/s/Garth
Johnson                                                                            


Name:      
___________________________________

Print         
___________________________________

Name:       
___________________________________

Address:   ___________________________________

                   
___________________________________
# CE2004084EN.01013201.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/132 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/132

---

(2004/C 84 E/0169)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-4021/03

by Ilda Figueiredo (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(9 January 2004)

Subject:   Support for research in Portugal

Subject:

The Operational Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation is the main source of funding for R&D projects in Portugal, with 50 % of the relevant funds coming from the Community.

However, the Portuguese institutions and centres which depend on the regular receipt of funds for R&D projects approved by the Foundation for Science and Technology are currently experiencing severe problems, as the Community funds concerned have not been transferred. The situation is serious, in view of the very considerable needs of research projects in Portugal.

Can the Commission state:

| 1. | what forms of support for R&D have been earmarked for Portugal under the third Community support framework and the existing Community programmes? |
| --- | --- |

1.

what forms of support for R&D have been earmarked for Portugal under the third Community support framework and the existing Community programmes?

| 2. | what delays have occurred in the transfer of funds, and why? |
| --- | --- |

2.

what delays have occurred in the transfer of funds, and why?

| 3. | what measures are being considered to support research projects and the relevant investment in Portugal? |
| --- | --- |

3.

what measures are being considered to support research projects and the relevant investment in Portugal?

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(2 March 2004)

(2 March 2004)

In the context of the Third Community Support Framework (CSF), support for Research and Development (R&D) in Portugal is mainly provided by the Science, Technology, Innovation Operational Programme (POCTI) and, to a lesser extent, by the Information Society Operational Programme (POSI).

Following national and Community audits, which identified certain irregularities in the management of the POCTI programme, the Portuguese authorities have decided to suspend the certification of payments to be presented to the Commission under this programme until appropriate corrective action has been taken.

Given the importance of research in the context of regional development, the Portuguese authorities and the Commission are — in the framework of the mid-term review of the Portuguese Community Support Framework — currently discussing possible modifications aiming at strengthening the innovation aspects of the CSF.

Outside the context of the CSF, R&D can also be financed through the Research and Technological Development (RTD) Framework Programmes. The funds for the framework Programmes are not allocated by Member State and are subject to competitive tenders.

---
**EXHIBIT
      23**

















**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
        consent to
        the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-97327 on
        Form
        S-8 pertaining to the Premier Financial Bancorp, Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan
        of
        our report dated March 30, 2007 on the consolidated financial statements
        of
        Premier Financial Bancorp, Inc., which report is included in Form 10-K for
        Premier Financial Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.


/s/
      Crowe Chizek and Company LLC


Crowe
      Chizek and Company LLC





Columbus,
      Ohio


March
      30, 2007
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Seventh Generation, Inc. and subsidiary on Form S-8 (File No. 33-85748) of our
report dated February 12, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Seventh Generation, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1998
and December 31, 1997, and for the years then ended, which report is included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP
Albany, NY
March 26, 1999
REF ID :A522699 ~ ;J.,~-<~ .'\ ~ e(/Y \ 

l ""-!. 

NAVSECSTA WASH 

FROM: SUSLO LONDON 111125Z 

TO: USCIB COORDINATOR 

T 0 P S E 0 R-E T 

y~~ 

11 APRIL 51/BF 

PRIORITY 

S-2¢856 

REUR 142211Z MARCH. LSIB IN GENERAL AGREEMENT PROPOSED 

AGENDA. DETAILS FOLLOW LATER TODAY. 

ON OR ABOUT 13 APRIL BRITISH Wfll FORWAnD PAPERS {IN 

SUFFICIENT NUMBER OF COPIES FOR EACH US CONFEREE) SETTING 

FORTH THEIR VIEWS CONCERNING ITEMS ON AGENDA. DIRECTOR 

GCHQ REQUESTS THAT US VIEWS BE SENT HERE, TO ARRIVE NOT 

LATER THAN 22 APRllo 

NAVSECSTA ROUTING: 

ACTION: JLGo••••• 

AFSA-131 •••••• 

PARAPHRASE ~OT REQUIRED. 

CONSULT CRYPTOCENTER BEFORE DECLASSIFYING. 

111125Z 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-05-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------

            WINTHROP RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATES I, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
            --------------------------------------------------------
                            FORM 10-QSB JUNE 30, 2003
                            -------------------------


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION REQUIRED PURSUANT TO SECTION 9.4 OF THE PARTNERSHIP
AGREEMENT

1.     Statement of Cash Available for Distribution for the three months ended
       June 30, 2003:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
       <S>                                                                           <C>
       Net loss                                                                      $       (31,000)
       Add:    Cash from reserves                                                             55,000
                                                                                     -----------------
       Cash Available for Distribution                                               $        24,000
                                                                                     =================
       Distributions allocated to General Partners                                   $             -
                                                                                     =================
       Distributions allocated to Limited Partners                                   $        24,000
                                                                                     =================
</TABLE>

2.     Fees and other compensation paid or accrued by the Partnership to the
       General Partners, or their affiliates, during the three months ended June
       30, 2003:

           Entity Receiving                    Form of
             Compensation                    Compensation              Amount
       ---------------------------     ------------------------    -------------

                 None
****

****

****

   

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intergraph Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Larry J. Laster,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

           (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                      of the Company.

By:          /s/ Larry J. Laster Name:    Larry J. Laster                                                        Title:       Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  Date:      November 9, 2004

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Intergraph Corporation and will be retained by Intergraph Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
|  |
|--|
|  |  |
NRO HOSTS TECHNOLOGY FORUM 

2000

February 24, 2000 

The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) has decided to host its annual Technology Forum in 

October. Traditionally, the forum is held in May, but this year it has been moved to correspond 

better with the annual budget cycle and to avoid conflicts with other conferences. Registration 

packets for Technology Forum 2000 will be sent out in July.