alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion issued January 21, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 5
- 00 1 6 5
- CV

——————————— KATHY SHAW , Appellant

V. JUANITA CESAR WORREL L, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 10 56 3 7 9

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Kathy Shaw, proceeding pro se , appealed from the trial court’s
final judgment , signed on January 1 2, 201 5 , in this forcible detainer action

. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.1 . However, after the clerk’s record was filed on October 27,2

2015, making the appellate record complete because ther e was no reporter’s
record , a ppellant failed to timely file h er appellate brief. See id. 38.6( a )

. On December 16 , 2015 , the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that her appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to timely file h er appellate brief , and that her appeal would be dismissed unless she r espon d e d within 10 days. See id. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(c)

. The Court’s notice was returned with the following marked on the envelope: “RETURN TO SENDER[,] NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED[,] UNABLE TO FORWARD.” A ppellant has neither timely filed her brief or other response to the Court’s notice, nor provided the Clerk of this Court with any other address

. See id. 9.1(b) (“A party not represented by counsel must sign any document . . . and give the party’s mailing address, telephone number, fax number, if any, and email address.”); 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(c). Accordingly, w e dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c). We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justi ces Jennings, Keyes, and Bland.
A .sers 

SAFSL BYE Taaiimalipt 

R 

HANDLE VIA. 

BYEMAN-TALENT-KEYHOLE 

LLt Jt l JULY CU 13 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR STAFF SUMMARY SR* 

TO ACTION TO ACTION SIGNATURE (Surname Grade) SIG NA Tilgetarleme and Grade) 

1 6 

SAFSLP Coord Colonel Ford ■ / 

,.. _ 

2 SAFSLS Coord M. upbard 

3 1 7

SAFSLB Coord Colonel White 

a Ai. SL Sign 

,41 7 

Gener art 91/11 I/r 

40 1 

S UReNdeCk t/N OFF GRADE SYMBOL NE YPIST'S INIT. SUSPE SE DATE 

Lt Col R. H. Campbell SAFSLO 52083 shw 

SUBJECT DATE 

Intelligence Targets for MOL Crew Training 4 rF' 1969 

SUMMARY 

PROBLEM: To provide the MOL Systems Office with a list of intelligence 

targets for use in implementing crew mission training. 

DISCUSSION: 

In a November 1968 briefing at the MOL Systems Office on the MOL 

crew training program General Stewart and General Bleymaier agreed 

that the astronauts should begin familiarizing themselves with intelligence targets and complexes likely to be among the more important 

DORIAN targets in the 1971-73 time period. Accordingly, General Stewart 

agreed to forward to General Bleymaier a list of 25-50 installations 

of this kind. 

The list was compiled with the assistance of DIAXX and Lt Col Lycar. 

(MOL/SOC). Intelligence reports published in the past six months were 

research to obtain candidate installations of high interest to technical 

intelligence. The list was screened against target priorities for 

KH-8 missions 4315, 4316, 4317, and 4318 to assure inclusion of highvalue targets being covered by the KH-8 system. Also, the list was 

prepared so as to include targets from all major COMIREX categories 

(missiles, aircraft, etc.), and from as many COMIREX sub-categories 

(ICBM's, missile R&D, aircraft R&D, nuclear R&D, etc.) as possible. 

The final list includes 61 installations in the Soviet Union and 

Communist China that are of extreme interest to those involved in - 

producing technical intelligence. This list represents a distillation 

from over 200 installations initially nominated in the compilation 

process. Some of the installations are actually complexes of many 

COMIREX targets (e.g., Tyuratam, Sary Shagan, Plesetsk, etc.). 

. , 

The attached Memorandum for General Bleymaier forwards the target 

list, together with explanatory material and a list of ten targets that 

can be used by the Systems Office if the total list is too much to A. 

start with. 

DORIA,V„„,e um .--... ■ or Aiwa rese rPage 1 of 2 pages 

1 ,-• r _ / SIIITA 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

IA IAIrI V 

AA FIVIA6 MAR 0.4YENTdigfigligNS OF THIS 

CONTROL: SYSTEMS 90INTEY 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN-TALENT-KEYHOLE 

CONTROL SYSTEMS JOINTLY 

RECOMMENDATION: That the attached proposed Memorandum to General 

Bleymaier be signed. 

otWAA 

BEN IN J. RET 

Lt Colonel, USAF 

Chief, Operations Division 

1 Attachment 

Memo to Gen Bleymaier 

w/Atch 

DORIAN 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN-TALENT-KEYHOLE 

CONTROL SYSTEMS JOINTLY 

Page 2 of 2 pages 

Copy 1 of 5 copies 

SAFSL BYE dal 

3$3--4
#### State ex rel. Danielson, Respondent, vs. Zuehlke, Appellant.

*November 26*

December *13, 1907.*

*State ex rel. Lochschmidt v. Raisler, ante,*p. 672, followed.

Tliis case is in all respects like the preceding case, *State ex rel. Lochschmidt v. Raisler, ante,*p. 672, 114 N. W. 118, except that the office involved is that of register of deeds for Outagamie county; that the total vote as canvassed was 3,469 for defendant as against 3,420 for relator, which included alleged illegal Indian votes canvassed and counted, 71 for defendant and 28 for relator. The same ■order was entered and appeal taken hy defendant.

The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *A. M. Spencer*and *Albert H. Krugmeier,*and for the respondent on that' ■of *Joseph Roemer*and *Henry D. Ryan.*

Dodge, J.

The considerations controlling the above-mentioned case necessitate the same conclusion in this.

*By the Court.*— Order from which appeal is taken is reversed, and -cause remanded with directions to sustain the demurrer.

Cassoday, C. J., took no part.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)
  (i)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
 (ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the
periods indicated.
 Date:  August 5, 2009
    /S/ JOHN R. GIBSONJohn R. GibsonChairman of the Board and Chief Executive

Officer
USCIB: 13.5/92 

GONFil>HR:EAE. 

REF ID:A59284 

• ce11..tRBEJ\.TT'AL J.'t ~i i • 

6 December 1954 

Ml!MORANDID-1 FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

References: 

Developments in the Petersen Case. 

(a) USCIB 13.5/S9 of 23 November 1954. 

(b) USCIB 13.5/91 of 2 December ~954. 

1. For the in.formation of members, the arguments on the 

Motion to Dismiss circulated under cover 0£ reference (a) and the 

Statement in Opposition thereto circulated under cover of re.ference (b) were heard in Federal District Court in Alexandria at 

1000, 3 December 1954. The Court denied all of the motions to 

dismiss noting the exception by the def'ense attorney to the ruling 

on paragraph 1 of count 1 of the Bill o.f Particulars with regard 

to the statute of limitations. 

2. Except for a mere mention of the fact that COMINT material 

is involved, no revelations of classified in.formation were ma.de. 

USCIB: 13.5/92 

ptain, U. S. Navy Execu~ive Secretary, USCIB 

24 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-20-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

- COl\1-FIDEl\1TIAL ,.
March 12, 2012

The Honorable Ray LaHood, Secretary

U.S. Department of Transportation

400 Seventh Street SW

Washington, DC 20590-0001

RE: Docket DOT-OST-2000-7182

Dear Secretary LaHood:

North American Stainless is pleased to offer its support to the efforts of Frontier Airlines 

Inc. to initiate new nonstop jet service between Louisville, KY and Ronald Reagan 

Washington National Airport.

Frontier’s proposal brings important competition to one our region’s top air service 

routes, expands the availability of low fares in the Louisville market and significantly

expands access a top destination for business and leisure activities.

We have found Louisville and Southern Indiana to be an excellent place in which to do 

business and we believe that competitive jet service to the nation’s capital will greatly

enhance the travel options available from Louisville International Airport. We strongly 

encourage the Department of Transportation to approve Frontier’s proposal for new lowcost, large jet air service between Louisville and Washington DC.

Sincerely, 

Jim Williamson

Travel Coordinator-North American Stainless

6870 Highway 42 East

Ghent, Ky 41045

Phone: (502) 347-6962

Fax: (502) 347-6102

jwilliamson@northamericanstainless.com

http://www.northamericanstainless.com
Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, filed November 12, 2001



 Exhibit 4.4 
 ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 
 ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION 
 Pursuant to the provisions of article 4.04 of the
Texas Business Corporation Act, the undersigned corporation adopts the following Articles of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation: 
 ARTICLE ONE 
 The name of the corporation is AmeriCredit Corp. 
 ARTICLE TWO 
 The following amendment to the Articles of Incorporation was adopted by
the shareholders of the corporation on November 6, 2001. The Articles of Incorporation are amended to increase the authorized number of shares of Common Stock of the corporation from 120,000,000 to 230,000,000. 
 The amendment changes section 4.1 of article IV of the Articles of Incorporation and the full text of the provision as changed is a follows: 

“4.1 The aggregate number of shares which the corporation shall have authority to issue is Two Hundred Fifty Million (250,000,000) shares
divided into: one class of Two Hundred Thirty Million (230,000,000) shares of Common Stock of the par value of one cent ($0.01) per share, and one class of Twenty Million (20,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock of the par value of one cent
($0.01) per share which may be divided into and issued in series as described herein.” 
 ARTICLE THREE 
 The number of shares of the corporation outstanding at the time of such adoption was 84,339,085 shares of Common Stock; and the number of shares entitled
to vote thereon was 84,339,085 shares of Common Stock. 
 ARTICLE FOUR 
 The number of shares voted for such amendment was 67,647,029 shares of Common Stock; the number of shares voted against such amendment was 4,132,710
shares of Common Stock. 
 Dated: November 6, 2001. 
  


			
	AmeriCredit Corp.
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Chris A. Choate

		 	Chris A. Choate, Secretary
REF ID:A72037 e -~ 

Dr. John H. Curtiss 

National Bureau of Standards 

Washington 25, D. C. 

Dear John: 

~ • ... ... ..... .-f• 

October 31, 1952 

Shortly before or after receipt of this 

letter you will probably receive a request that you 

designate some member of your staff as executi..ve secretary 

for a 1953 version of SCAMP·· I have agreed to serve as 

technical chairman responsible for the professional aspect 

of the work and with the same sort of collaborative effort 

as last year for the recruitment of personnel.. 

I am wri ti.ng now to see whether you have 

any suggestions or advice based on last year•s experience. 

I am sending copies of this letter to Cahn, Hestenes and 

Tompkins. Part of my present purpose is to make sure that 

procedures are set in moti. on to provide us w1 th space for 

our group. My present opinion is that our space requirements would be approximately the same as last year. However, any modifying opinions from Tompkins should be taken 

funte·,accpun.t~i..l:it is my umerstanding that the executive 

secretary (this term seems to have been preferred to administrative chairman by the sponsoring agency) will take care 

of such things as supplies and equipment, physical arrangements and so on. It is al.so my hope that some secretarial 

assistance may be provided in the fom of someone who can 

take dictation. We are unlikely to get such a person from 

Washington although we would, of course, expect to have a 

SCAMP librarian in charge of the files. 

I expect to visit Washington November 10, 11 

and 12 and also during the Thanksgiving vacation. 

CC-A. S. Cahn 

M. Hestenes 

c. B. Tompkins 

W. F. Friedman 

Yours sincerely, 

s. s. Cairns 

Head of the Department 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 02-12-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
SECRE'f REF ID:A61. 

24 

USCIB: 29./3 

21 September 1954 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIBEC: 

Subject: Procedures for Handling Matters Affecting CCMINT Relations 

with Third Parties to the UKUSA Agreement. 

1. To achieve better coordination, under USCIB policy control, of 

matters involving CGiINT relations with third parties to the UKUSA 

Agreement the procedure set forth below is suggested. 

2. Whenever a contact with an official or officials of a foreign 

government develops the suggestion that an arrangement including COMINT 

assistance to or from a governmental activity of such foreign government 

might be desirable, an innnediate notification of the circumstances 

together with suitable recommendations should be sent to the Executive 

Secretary, USCIB. The Executive Secretary, USCIB will be expected to 

ref er such matters to USCIBEC as soon as practicable with a view to 

developing recommendations for further action. 

3. With regard to the suggestion set forth in paragraph 2 above, it 

is requested that the members of USCIBEC indicate their views by executing the attached vote sheet and returning it to this office by the close 

of business Thursday, 30 September 1954. 

4. THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION 

AND SHAU.. BE HANDLED ONLY IN CHANNELS EXPRESSLY PROVIDED FOR COMINT. 

USCIB: 29 • /3 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-17-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352B 

SECRET
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intermagnetics General Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending August 24, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Glenn H. Epstein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.


/s/ Glenn H. Epstein*
----------------------
Glenn H. Epstein
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
October 1, 2003


* These certifications are being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed
"filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to
the liability of that Section. These certifications shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LUC DORSIN and ERTHA JOSEPH a/k/a LISTA JOSEPH,

Appellants,

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW YORK 

as Trustee for THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS CWABS, INC.

ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-19,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-2421

[June 27, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Barry J. Stone, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. 

CACE10021750.

Nardo Dorsin of Nardo Dorsin, P.A., Tamarac, and F. Scott Fistel of 

Fistel Law Group, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Matthew A. Ciccio and Jennifer Travieso of Aldridge Pite, LLP, Delray 

Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., WARNER and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the periodic report of Dawson Geophysical Company (the
"Company") Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christina W. Hagan, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d);
          and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: July 18, 2003                              /s/ Christina W. Hagan
                                                  ----------------------------
                                                  Vice President and Chief
                                                  Financial Officer
**
**Exhibit 13.2**

**Certification**

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 ofTitle 18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of SK Telecom Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,that: 

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Form 20-F”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. 

 
Dated: April 27, 2018  
/s/ Young Sang Ryu
  **Young Sang Ryu**  **Chief Financial Officer**
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 
**
# CE2004084EN.01045201.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/452 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/452

---

(2004/C 84 E/0527)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0849/04

by Joan Vallvé (ELDR) to the Commission

(11 March 2004)

Subject:   Late payment in commercial operations

Subject:

8 August 2000 saw the publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities of Directive 2000/35/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on combating late payment in commercial transactions.

1

Article 6 of this directive lays down a deadline of two years from its publication for adoption by the Member States of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the directive. This deadline expired on 8 August 2002.

The directive makes it clear that late payment represent a failure to fulfil a contract, to the financial benefit of debtors. In addition, the existence of late payment on a larger scale in some Member States than others creates a distortion of free competition in the internal market.

In early July 2003 the Spanish government presented a draft law instituting measures against delayed payment in commercial transactions. However, the draft text, which appeared in report form in the Official Bulletin of the Spanish Parliament on 3 December 2003, has yet to be adopted.

Can the Commission ask the Spanish government to account for this delay and insist that Spain implements the directive as a matter of urgency?

Answer given by Mr Liikanen on behalf of the Commission

(31 March 2004)

(31 March 2004)

The Commission is conscious of the negative effects of late payments and accordingly is pursuing infringement proceedings against the relevant Member States (i.e. Spain and Luxembourg), as fast as possible. Infringement proceedings against Spain began on 30 September 2002, and the second stage was opened on 6 February 2003, when the Commission sent to the Spanish Government a Reasoned Opinion giving a time limit of two months for adopting all necessary national measures of transposition. On 9 September 2003 the Commission initiated proceedings against Spain before the Court of Justice (case C-384/03). There is no ruling yet, but it is expected in 6 to 12 months.

Unfortunately infringement proceedings tend to take a long time to reach a decision. The Commission hopes that Spain will now fulfil its responsibility under the Directive as quickly as possible, in order to avoid further proceedings before the Court of Justice.

---

(1)  OJ L 200, 8.8.2000, p. 35.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                              49
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (86)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,043
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,571
<PP&E>                                           7,997
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,197)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,741
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           284
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,652
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,677
<SALES>                                          5,336
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,336
<CGS>                                            1,889
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,894
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  35
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    442
<INCOME-TAX>                                       125
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                317
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       317
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>