alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: "Evans, Bill R." <WREVANS@southernco.com> Date: 7/21/2010 10:37 AM Subject: Re: Effluent limitations Guidelines ICR extension request - Georgia Power Co. Attachments: pic03760.gif; Georgia Power extension request.pdf

Greetings,

EPA has reviewed your extension requ est for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire for the following Georgia Power Company facilities:

Bowen Harllee Branch Hammond Edwin I. Hatch Kraft Jack McDonough McIntosh McManus Mitchell Scherer Vogtle Wansley Yates

The deadline for your plant to submit Version 1 and Version 2 of the completed questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010. Please note that the deadline for Part G, if applicable, is unchanged and remains 120 days after receipt of the questionnaire. No extensions are granted for Version 3 or 4 of the questionnaire; the deadline for plants receiving these questionnaires remains 90 days after receipt.

If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic03760.gif)

From: "Evans, Bill R." <WREVANS@southernco.com>

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/01/2010 08:03 AM

Subject: Effluent limitations Guidelines ICR extension request - Georgia Power Co.Dear Ms. Alicea, Attached is a request for extension of the deadline for submittal of responses to the effluent limitations guidelines questionnaire for all of Georgia Power Company's plants. A paper copy has been submitted to you through U.S. Postal Service.

Thank you for your consideration. Please call me if you have questions.

Bill Evans Environmental Principal Georgia Power Company 404-506-7031

(See attached file: Georgia Power extension request.pdf)
# CE2004078EN.01085801.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/858 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/858

---

(2004/C 78 E/0911)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3796/03

by Chris Davies (ELDR) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject:   Maríne Stewardship Council

Subject:

What support, financial or otherwise, does the Commission give to the Maríne Stewardship Council?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(23 January 2004)

(23 January 2004)

The Maríne Stewardship Council (MSC) certification scheme is a private initiative which rewards certain fishing practices with a distinctive label at the request of fishing operators so consumers can direct their choices towards their products. The Commission has no legal instruments to give financial support to this type of private initiative, although it is recognised that they might contribute to sustainable fisheries in certain conditions. The Commission is currently in the process of drawing up a Communication which will propose the principles and conditions under which certification schemes and eco-labels should operate in the context of the Common Fisheries Policy.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7471

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JESUS ALBERTO SARMIENTO, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CR-95-389-AW, CA-01-1860-AW) Submitted: December 10, 2001 Decided: January 11, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jesus Alberto Sarmiento, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Jesus Alberto Sarmiento appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Sarmiento , Nos. CR-95-389-AW; CA-01-1860-AW (D. Md. July 12, 2001); see also United States v. McAllister , F.3d , 2001 WL 1387341 (4th Cir. 2001) (rejecting challenge to constitutionality of 21 U.S.C.A. § 841 (West 1999 & Supp. 2001) in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000)). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
REF ID:A54273 

&NFIDENTIAt 

DIGEST OF THE DIRECTOR'S 

STAFF CONFERENCE 

4 JAN.· 1955 

TO: Chiefs of Offices and Staff Divisions 

FROM: Chi~f of Staff 

1. CHIEF OF STAFF 

a. Reported on his visit to the in~erim site. 

b. Announced that Personnel Division will be working on two 

personnel studies, one relating to our military strength and one on 

civilian utilization. Your assistance in expediting these studies is 

requested. 

c. Stated that review of the Operational Summary has been made 

by members of the operating and staff personnel with a view to injecting 

some graphic descriptions that will eliminate unnecessary detail. This 

does not mean, however, that operating offices need reduce their reports 

and operational suunnaries of matters pertinent to their operations. 

2. ADJUTANT GENERAL 

Announced that the revised Chapter 5 of the ColDillunications and 

Publications Manual is in distribution today. The new system involving 

the use of multilith masters is effective 10 January; however, these 

masters may be used now. 

3. LOGISTICS 

Reported on the establishment of a Custodial account for plant 

equipment. This system will become effective for the interim operations 

and will el~minate the paper work, insofar as the Support Group and PROD 

are concerned, with capital equipment. 

4. COMPTROLLER 

a. Announced that Lt. Col. Charles Milroy, USAF, has completed 

his indoctrination tour and is now assigned to the Office of the Comptroller as assistant to Colonel Jones. 

b. Stated that Form W-2, Statement of Withholding Taxes, will 

be distributed to civilian personnel on 6 January. 

5. DIRECTOR 

"A word a.bout the move. After we get up there, it's our problem 

to make it work; everyone has a share in it. We cannot sit back with 

C()NFIDEN'FIAL Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-28-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
............ ----------------~~~~~·~ -

~ REF ID:A5427l 

ONFIDENTI~ 

the attitude 'Let somebody else do it; I won't do anything until he does 

his job.' The Fort Meade people are doing a pretty good job cooperating 

with us. If we make an honest attempt up there to do our part and a 

little more than we are supposed to, we will be successful. You always 

find the successful guy over on the other Bide of the other guy's line, 

and he is very seldom penalized for being off-side. You a.re very seldom 

penalized for being off-side, so let's make our move up there in the 

same way, with the same efficiency that we moved across France and Germany 

ten years ago, and do a. little bit more than our part." 

~~ c/s 

2 

€0NFIBEN'FIAL
'. &El" 1"FfOOR-~. ·ii----_; -~u 49 

USCIB: 5/41D 

/)OS i1: t!/~ ~ 

/;J.. ~~L.&.. 

24 

l8 lovaDber 1952 

MIMO.RANDUH POR 'l'BI MEM8B at USCIB: 

Subject: 80tJi USCIB Maet;iDg. 

1. Canfirming illf'ormal notification, the SOl;b USCIB 

Meet;ing baa bem postponed bl' the Chairman at the request of the Assistant Chiet ot statt, G-2, Departnmt ot the Arsqy. 

2. The Chabman deairea that the postpaned maet.1ng 

be held on FJ".ldq, 28 Novembv 1952, at lJ,30. 

USCIB: 5/l+lD 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-09-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

RESTRICTED
... "--' 

USCIB: 13.2/50 

ii:Q:Rm 

sMf.,J,D:A65292 

L:.\,,,l\.L:. I ' ' ,.._.,, 

6 January 1955 

MEMORANDUM. FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB1

: 

Subject: Clearance for Access to CCMINT (ANDERSON). 

24 

1. In view of the urgency indicated in the enclosure, this office 

presented the essence of the proposal therein to all members by telephone 

this date. 

2. The proposal received unan:imous approval, and the CIA member was 

authorized to proceed accordingly. 

I 

3. Realizing that hurry-up requests of this nature require additional 

effort and disrupt orderly processes for all concerned, this office is most 

grateful for the prompt attention given by all member organizations. 

Enclosure 

CIA Memo dtd 6 Jan 1955 

USCIB: 13.2/50 

tain, U. S. Navy '"--·~·ti ve Secretary, USCIB 

1 . 

11:11.:NBHS '.r!A OOMIN'f eHltNNELS OMLY 

SECRE'f' 

------------LJeclassifi ed and approved for release by NSA on..-----------, 

2-12-2014 ursuantto E.O. 13526 
OGA 

REF ID:A65292 EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605
- .. 

USCIB: 14. 5/3 

SIMi a.a. 1¥18 MI 

HSJ:JlRANDJJM lOR THE r.pmms OF USCIB: 

16 July 1954 

ED 3.3(h) (2) 

PL~6-36/50 USC 3605 

Subject: Extension or Existing Arrarments for) 

Reference: USCIB Directive ~ber 12, approved 6 April 1954. 

1. The enclosur', which describes action taken by the S USLO on 

behalf of the CIA Member is circulated for information. 

2, It should be noted that the action was taken prior to promulgation ot the reterence, 

3, In this connection, attention is invited to paragraph 8 of the 

reference which outlines the currently approved procedure for extension 

of existing arrangements tor liaison involving dissemination ot COMINT 

to foreign governmental activities. 

4, In the event that any member should in the future have a 

similar requirement for SUSL01s services a statement of specific 

limitations on dissemination should be included. I.t the dissemination 

desired is to exceed the arrangements already notified to the Board, 

a notice of such intent should be circulated to the Board in sufficient 

time to permit any obscure objections to be raised ... 

5. THIS DOCUM!:NT AND ITS ENCLOSURE CONTAIN COMMUNICATIONS 

INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION AND SHALL BE HANDLm> ONLY IN CHANNEIS 

EXPRF.SSLY PROVmED FOR COMINT • 

. Enclosure 

Memo from CIA Member of 

USCIB to Ex/Secy dtd 14 Jul 54. 

cc: smto' London 

USCIB: 14. 5/3 . 

24 

eclassifi ed and a ursuantto E .0. 1352
USCIB: 13.7/9 

SI!l6Hl!i'f 

REF ID:A65861 

SECRET • 

7 April 195.3 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

References: 

Review or "Need to Know" or Personnel Employed 

in Private Industry. 

(a) USCIB 13/351 of' 13 July 1953. 

(b) USCIB Directive Number 5. 

31 

1. Reports received in answer to reference (a) above indicate a 

total or ninety (90) employees of commercial firms and civilian research 

institutions currently indoctrinated for COMINT. This figure appears to 

be excessive. 

2. It is therefore suggested that each USCIB member review the 

"need to lmow" of such persons indoctrinated by him, coordinating with 

other members having liaison requirements with the same activity, in an 

effort to reduce the number of COMJNr cleared persons in private industry. 

3. THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION 

AND SHALL BE HANDLED ONLY IN CHANNELS EXPRFSSLY PROVIDED FOR C01'lINT. 

USClB: l.3.7/9 

aptain, U. • Navy 

ecutive Secretary, USCIB 

SECRET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-26-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. PF15-1-000]

                    On January 13, 2015, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) issued a                     *Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental                               ( print page 10682)                            Impact Statement for the Planned PennEast Pipeline Project, Requests for Comments on Environmental Issues, and Notice of Public Scoping Meetings.*                     The notice solicited comments on the potential environmental impacts of the planned project and announced the time and location of five public scoping meetings being held for the environmental proceedings.                

Due to unforeseen circumstances, the Commission staff is postponing the scoping meeting planned for Wednesday, January 28, 2015 at Bucks County Community College, Kevin and Sima Zlock Performing Arts Center Gateway Auditorium, 275 Swamp Road, Newtown, Pennsylvania 18940. Once a new venue is established and scheduled, the Commission will issue another notice advising of the new location and time.

Dated: January 26, 2015.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-04049 Filed 2-26-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# CE2004078EN.01054502.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/545 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/545

---

(2004/C 78 E/0574)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3426/03

by Mario Borghezio (NI) to the Commission

(18 November 2003)

Subject:   Eurostat scandal — unanswered questions

Subject:

To what extent was the Commission informed of the accusations made by Mrs Dorte Schmidt-Brown? Did it receive information about the problems of Eurocost on 13 November 2000 and did it ask Mr Franchet to reply? Did it inform Commissioner Solbes of the problems or was he asked to take any action? Did it follow the case or inform any other Member of the Commission? What measures did the Commission take in response to the letter of 12 July 2002 from Freddy Blak, Member of the European Parliament?

---
NlFJ.W.Nl"'U'.........-................... ..... ... ......... .....--........... fJPJl CE OF CO*mCATIOM S'WURM 

mAT'IONAL ~tmXTY MmNCY 

5 ~ 1954 

CO!llSEC J>IREX:TIVE NO 4-0-10 

~ g Short Titles 800. Functional Symbols for Use Witbiil 

the Office ot Cam.mi~ticms Security 

Ref'errencee: (&) NBA ReauJ,atiw No .. 20-2, 2 Feb ~3 

(b) ~ Directive mo !c.-0-10., 26 Aue 53 

ms DIRliDrIVE m EFFJ!CnVE tmTXL 5 ~ 195~ 

UNLESS OOOilmR RESCim>ED 

l Reference (b) is cancelled am will be remo ed f'roo ihe 

tiles e.iad destrqyed 

2 ~ $CCOrdance with reference (a), the follo~ short titles 

tiiD.13. ~bole m-e established for use m thin the Office of Call!'munica:tions 

Security~ 

Deputy Director, Cc:mr.aunications Sec-Jri ty 

Aesietant Deputy Director; Cammmications 

Securitw 

DD/CO»m:C 11() 

Exacutive Aseietamit, Comarunieations Secur~:ty ---

Aihiinistrative Group 

Plamling Group 

~nt Group ~sis and EvaltM!.tion Di\ision 

Crypto-ED.gineeril'lg :00.viaion 

Ci'ypto-Ai&e Diviaion 

-- 4oA 

4<m 

l!ol 

lio2 

4o3 

41 

42 

43 

3. The use of short title or symbol 1s optiOl!lal. w.ithin the Of'f'ice 

of Cmmm.mic~;tione Security Lon& ti'Ucs onl,v: (except DD/C~) mil Toe 

u~ on correimpondence goiiag to c~nents of NS.I\ outside the Of'f ice of C~:i!.cs.tlomi Security The symbol13 of 40, 4oA, e.nd 40B wUl be \Wed 

oo intemal Roui:f..mg Slips or for accounting purposea 

4 Supervision for implementation or the policy established herei&i 

ia the responsiibility or the Chief, Administrat -e Group 

Fo Ee HCRru:!l<O 

Colonel, U S Air Force 

Deputy Director 

Can:municat:tons Security 

CONFIDENTIAL 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-04-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
NO. 07-03-0250-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	DECEMBER 15, 2004

	______________________________

	GREGORY TODD RILES, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 43,281-E; HONORABLE RICHARD DAMBOLD, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellant Gregory Todd Riles appeals from a judgment revoking community supervision and imposing sentence pursuant to a conviction for theft from a person.  We affirm.

	Appellant entered a plea of guilty to a charge of theft from a person.  The trial court, found that the evidence substantiated appellant’s guilt, accepted the guilty plea, found appellant guilty, and sentenced him to confinement for two years in a state jail facility and a $500 fine.  Execution of the sentence was suspended and appellant was placed on community supervision for five years. Appellant did not appeal.

	The State filed a motion to revoke.   Appellant pled true to all of the grounds alleged as bases for the motion.  The trial judge modified the terms of appellant’s probation.   

	A second motion to revoke was filed.  Appellant pled not true.  During the hearing, appellant testified in his own defense and admitted violations of conditions of his probation.  The trial judge found that appellant violated the terms of his probation, revoked the order placing appellant on community supervision, and sentenced appellant to 14 months confinement in a state jail facility and a fine of $500.00. 

	Appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief in support of the motion.  Counsel has certified that the record has been diligently reviewed and, in her opinion, the record reflects no reversible error or grounds upon which an appeal can be predicated.  Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744-45, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).  Thus, she concludes the appeal is frivolous and without merit.  In compliance with High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978), counsel has discussed why, under the controlling authorities, there is no error in the court’s judgment.  Counsel has also demonstrated that she has sent a copy of the brief to appellant and informed appellant that, in counsel’s view, the appeal is without merit.  In addition, counsel has demonstrated that she notified appellant of his right to review the record and file a pro se response if he so desired.  Appellant has not filed a response to counsel’s motion and brief.

	We have made an independent examination of the record to determine whether there are any arguable grounds for appeal.  See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed 2d 300 (1988); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991).  We have found no such grounds.  We agree that the appeal is frivolous. 

	Accordingly, counsel’s Motion to Withdraw is granted.  The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

							Phil Johnson

							Chief Justice

Do not publish.
EXHIBIT 11



BAIRNCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED APRIL 3, 2004 AND APRIL 5, 2003

(Unaudited)





|                                                                                             | 2004             | 2003            
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------- | ----------------
|BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:                                                             |                  |                 
|                                                                                             |                  |                 
|Net income                                                                                   | $ 1,255,000      | $     889,000   
|Average common shares outstanding                                                            | 7,342,000        | 7,334,000       
|Basic Earnings Per Common Share                                                              | $          0.17  | $           0.12
|                                                                                             |                  |                 
|DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:                                                           |                  |                 
|                                                                                             |                  |                 
|Net income                                                                                   | $  1,255,000     | $      889,000  
|Average common shares outstanding                                                            | 7,342,000        | 7,334,000       
|Dilutive effect of restricted stock                                                          | 39,000           | --              
|Common shares issuable in respect to options issued      to employees with a dilutive effect | 50,000           | 2,000           
|Total diluted common shares outstanding                                                      | 7,431,000        | 7,336,000       
|Diluted Earnings Per Common Share                                                            | $           0.17 | $           0.12
|                                                                                             |                  |                 





#
### AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

No F

- 2005

- 118 R1 Distribution:



### A Issue date:

February 01, 2006 Page :

1 / 1

Direction

générale

de

l’aviation This Airworthiness Directive is published by the DGAC on behalf of

EASA, Airworthiness Au thority of the State of Design for the affected

product, part or appliance. Translation of « Consigne de Navigabilité » of same

number.

In case of difficulty, reference should be made to

the French issue.

civile

France

GSAC

publication No person m ay operate an aircraft to which an Airworthiness Directive applies,

except in accordance with the requirements of that Airworthiness Directive,

unless otherwise agreed with the Authority of the State of Registry.

Corresponding foreign Airworthiness Dir ective(s):

Not applicable Airworthiness Directive(s) replaced:

UF

- 2005

- 118 R1 and F

- 2005

- 118 original issue

Person in charge of airworthiness:



### EUROCOPTER

Type certificate(s) No. 56

TCDS No 127, EASA.R.002 Type(s): 

### AS 332 L2 and EC 225 LP helicopters

ATA chapter:



### 53 Subject:



### Fuselage

- Frame 5295 and rear MGB suspension bar attaching fittings

CANCELLATION NOTICE

This Revision 1 cancels Airworthiness Directive (AD) F

- 2005

- 118, which is replaced by AD F

- 2006

- 020 for

AS 332 L2 helicopters and by AD F

- 2006

- 021 for EC 225 LP helicopters.

This Revision has been the subject of an emergency di ffusion on January 16, 2006.

This AD Revision is approved under EASA reference No 2006

- 0014 dated January 16, 2006.

EFFECTIVE DATES :

Original issue : Upon receipt of the emergency AD issued on July 06, 2005

Revision 1 : Upon receipt of the emergency AD issued on January 16, 2006.

n/CG