alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

HomeHistoryCryptologic HistoryHistorical FiguresHistorical Figures View

# NSA Historical Figures

                Download            

# Iris Carr

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Biographyhistorical figureIris Carrafrican american honoree
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                            18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SK Telecom Co., Ltd. (the "Company") on
Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kil Seung Son, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Young Jin Kim, as Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
(15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Kil Seung Son
------------------------------
Name:  Kil Seung Son
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  JUNE 3, 2003


/s/ Young Jin Kim
------------------------------
Name:  Young Jin Kim
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  JUNE 3, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 MAY 2, 2011

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 10-13285 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 4:10-cv-00098-SPM-WCS

BENJAMIN N. MOOTS,

 lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

SANDEEP RAHANGDALE,

T. BLANKENSHIP,

LARRY A. BAKER,

 lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants-Appellees,

JEREMY VAUGHAN,

 lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Northern District of Florida

 ________________________

(May 2, 2011)
Before BARKETT, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin N. Moots, a state prisoner, appeals pro se the dismissal of his

complaint that prison officials Walter McNeil, Sandeep Rahangdale, Tammy

Blankenship, and Larry Baker violated his civil rights under the Eighth

Amendment. 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court ruled that the prison officials

had not been deliberately indifferent to Moots’s medical condition. We affirm.

Moots’s complaint fails to allege that he has a serious medical condition or,

even assuming that his condition is serious, that prison officials have been

indifferent to Moots’s medical needs. After Moots was imprisoned, he was

diagnosed with gynecomastia, a condition that causes an enlargement of male

breast tissue. Moots “received medical test[s] to determine” if “there [had been]

an underlying cause for his condition” and if he had cancer, but the tests revealed

Moots’s gynecomastia requires only cosmetic treatment. Moots’s “‘medical need

[is not] one that, if left unattended, poses a substantial risk of serious harm.’” 

Mann v. Taser Intern., Inc., 588 F.3d 1291, 1307 (11th Cir. 2009) (quoting Farrow

v. West, 320 F.3d 1235, 1243 (11th Cir. 2003)). Moots has received ibuprofen for

pain and “psychiatric treatment” to combat his “emotional suffering, depression,

anxiety,” and problems with his self-image, and prison officials have housed him

2
in a segregation unit to prevent any potential mistreatment by fellow inmates. 

Moots requested a mastectomy, but prison officials required that Moots first

undergo a mammogram, which Moots refused. Moots’s disagreement with the

course of treatment provided by the prison officials does not “support a claim of

cruel and unusual punishment.” Harris v. Thigpen, 941 F.2d 1495, 1505 (11th Cir.

1991). 

The dismissal of Moots’s complaint is AFFIRMED.

3
• 

USCIB: 4/60 

REF ID: A67 535 . 

CONFIDEN'fiAL e 

Seettrit.y Information 

23 June 195.3 

MEMORA.NDlJM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Appointments to Membership on the USCIB 

Security Committee. 

1. The USCIB Executive Committee (USCIBEC) at its First 

Meeting on 27 May 1953 approved the Terms of Reference for the 

USCIB Security Committee (USCIBSECCCM). 

2. Notification of this action of USCIBEC vas forwarded to 

the members of USCIB for information, under date of 5 June 195.3, 

together with a copy of the proposed USCIB Directive embodying the 

Terms of Reference for USCIBSECCOM. No objection on the part of 

any member of USCIB having been made in the premises, the Directive 

is considered to have USCIB approval as of 17 June 195.3, and the 

Security Committee is thereby established as a standing group for, 

and under the direction of, USCIB and USCIBEC. 

3. Pursuant to the provisions of the instant Directive, 

"the Security Committee shall be composed of one representative 

f'rom each of the member departments and agencies of USCIB, to be 

designated by the incumbent USCIB member." · 

4. It is requested., therefore, that appointments to membership on the Security Committee be forwarded to the Executive Secretary not later than 29 June 1953. 

5. Copies of the approved Directive vi.11 be circulated. in 

the near future. 

USCIB: 4/60 

RUFUS L. R 

Captain, u. s. Navy 

ecutive Secretary, USCIB 

CONll"lDENTn\L 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-17-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352B 

24
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**







CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Lattice Incorporated (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul
      Burgess, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Lattice Incorporated and will be retained by Lattice Incorporated and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date: August
              20, 2007
            /s/
              Paul
              BurgessName: 
              Paul BurgessTitle: 
Chief
              Executive Officer
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

No F-2005-118 R1

Distribution:

A

Issue date:

February 01, 2006

Page :

1/1

Direction 

générale

de 

l’aviation

This Airworthiness Directive is published by the DGAC on behalf of 

EASA, Airworthiness Authority of the State of Design for the affected 

product, part or appliance.

Translation of « Consigne de Navigabilité » of same 

number.

In case of difficulty, reference should be made to 

the French issue.

civile

France

GSAC

publication

No person may operate an aircraft to which an Airworthiness Directive applies, 

except in accordance with the requirements of that Airworthiness Directive, 

unless otherwise agreed with the Authority of the State of Registry.

Corresponding foreign Airworthiness Directive(s):

Not applicable

Airworthiness Directive(s) replaced:

UF-2005-118 R1 and F-2005-118 original issue

Person in charge of airworthiness:

 EUROCOPTER

Type certificate(s) No. 56

TCDS No 127, EASA.R.002

Type(s):

AS 332 L2 and EC 225 LP helicopters

ATA chapter:

53

Subject:

Fuselage - Frame 5295 and rear MGB suspension bar attaching fittings

CANCELLATION NOTICE

This Revision 1 cancels Airworthiness Directive (AD) F-2005-118, which is replaced by AD F-2006-020 for 

AS 332 L2 helicopters and by AD F-2006-021 for EC 225 LP helicopters.

This Revision has been the subject of an emergency diffusion on January 16, 2006.

This AD Revision is approved under EASA reference No 2006-0014 dated January 16, 2006.

EFFECTIVE DATES:

Original issue : Upon receipt of the emergency AD issued on July 06, 2005

Revision 1 : Upon receipt of the emergency AD issued on January 16, 2006.

n/CG
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,985,403
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,985,403
<PP&E>                                      19,700,511
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,685,914
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          146,130
<BONDS>                                        641,608
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,898,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,685,914
<SALES>                                      3,225,963
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,544,041
<CGS>                                          782,646
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  782,646
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               800,716
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,960,679
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,960,679
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,960,679
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    93.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    93.19
        

</TABLE>
#### Blumenstein, Respondent, vs. Pilon, Appellant.

*September 19*

October *14, 1924.*

*Criminal conversation: Evidence: Sufficiency.*

A judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action for criminal conversation is *held*supported by the evidence, p. 625.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Fond du Lac county: Chester A. Fowler, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*625For the appellant there was a brief by *Reilly & O’Brien*of Fond du Lac, and oral argument by /. *E. O’Brien.*

For the respondent there were briefs by *GUcksman, Gold & Corrigan*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Walter D. Corrigan.*

Owen, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in a crim. con. action. Numerous errors are assigned. Some of them are not without technical merit. None of them involve novel questions of law. Their discussion would but reiterate principles well settled by the decisions of this court. The judgment is so strongly supported by the evidence that such errors as exist cannot be deemed prejudicial. We feel that their elaborate treatment will benefit no one. It would add nothing new to legal literature nor promote the interest of the parties involved.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,340
<ALLOWANCES>                                       163
<INVENTORY>                                      9,868
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,419
<PP&E>                                          16,385
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,714
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,668
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,274
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          4
<COMMON>                                           424
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,412)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,668
<SALES>                                         12,342
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,345
<CGS>                                           10,047
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 750
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    171
<INCOME-TAX>                                         8
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                163
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       163
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
# C_2005031EN.01000401.xml

| 5.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 9 December 2004

in Case C-333/04: Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 1999/92/EC - Protection of workers - Exposure to risk of explosive atmospheres - Failure to transpose)

(2005/C 31/09)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-333/04: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: D. Martin and H. Kreppel) v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Agent: S. Schreiner) – ACTION under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 2 August 2004 – the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: A. Borg Barthet, President of Chamber (Judge Rapporteur), J. Malenovský and U. Lõhmus, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 9 December 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the necessary laws, regulations and administrative provisions to comply with Directive 1999/92/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1999 on minimum requirements for improving the safety and health protection of workers potentially at risk from explosive atmospheres (15th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC), the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the necessary laws, regulations and administrative provisions to comply with Directive 1999/92/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1999 on minimum requirements for improving the safety and health protection of workers potentially at risk from explosive atmospheres (15th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC), the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 228, 11.9.2004.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 37 (Wednesday, February 25, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 10169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03804]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Effective date: February 25, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
February 18, 2015, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail 
Contract 113 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2015-33, CP2015-43.

Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Requirements.
[FR Doc. 2015-03804 Filed 2-24-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
USCIB: 13.2/42 

REF ID:A65318 

CQ\ifli!Jii1"iflAL • 1"z4 

2 November 1954 

MEMORANOOM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

Re.t'erence: 

Special Intelligence Clearance (CHRISTIANSEN). 

USCIB J:,3.2/40 dated 18 October 1954. 

As a result of discussions between the Defense and CIA Members 

and on the instructions of the form.er, Major General James G. 

Christiansen, USA., (Ret.), was cleared and indoctrinated by the Army 

Member on 27 October 1954. 

utive 

aptalll,~ Secretary, USCIB 

USCIB: 1.3.2/42 

COHPlt¥HflAL 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-27-2014 pursuant to E.O. 13526
EE-RM-STD-00-100 COMMENT 07BB 

tv 

Department of Energy 

Energy Efficiency Program for Commercial and Industrial Equipment: 

Efficiency Standards for Commercial HV AC and Water Heating Products 

9:00 - 9:05 am 

9:05 - 9: 15 am 

9: 15 - 9:30 am 

9:30 - 10: 15 am 

10: 15 - 10:30 am 

10:30 - 12:30 noon 

12:30 - 1:30 pm 

1:30 - 3:00 pm 

3:00 - 3: 15 pm 

3:15 - 4:30 pm 

4:30 - 4:45 pm 

4:45 - 5:00 pm 

5:00pm 

Public Workshop Agenda 

July 11, 2000 

Opening - Cyrus N asseri 

Agenda Review and Overview - Doug Brookman 

DOE Process and Inclinations - Cyrus Nasseri 

Brief Opening Statements by Stakeholders 

Break 

Commercial Product Screening Analysis - Presentation by PNNL, 

Comments by Stakeholders, and Discussion 

• Methodology 

• Results and Interpretations 

• Product Categories not included in the Analysis 

Lunch - (on your own) 

DOE Inclinations based on the Screening Analysis - Presentation by 

Cyrus Nasseri, Comments by Stakeholders, and Discussion 

• Adopt ASHRAE 90.1-1999 energy efficiency levels (20 

products) 

• Conduct further analyses (9 products) 

• Suggest ASHRAE addenda (4 products) 

• Retain current EPCA energy efficiency levels (1 product) 

Break 

Future Analytical Issues 

Next Steps - Cyrus Nasseri 

Closing 

Adjourn
II 

Calendar No. 172 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1596 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

2082 Stringtown Road in Grove City, Ohio, as the ‘‘Specialist Joseph 

W. Riley Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 17, 2015 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

JULY 29, 2015 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2082 Stringtown Road in Grove City, Ohio, 

as the ‘‘Specialist Joseph W. Riley Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SPECIALIST JOSEPH W. RILEY POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 2082 Stringtown Road in Grove 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1596 RS

1 City, Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Spe2 cialist Joseph W. Riley Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Specialist Joseph W. 

7 Riley Post Office Building’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

Calendar No. 172 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1596 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States PostRiley Post Office Building’’. Grove City, Ohio, as the ‘‘Specialist Joseph W. al Service located at 2082 Stringtown Road in 

JULY 29, 2015 

Reported without amendment 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS