alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24





Director                            POWER OF ATTORNEY


     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned directors of
CARACO PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES, LTD., a Michigan corporation, which is about
to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C. under the
provisions of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1977,
hereby nominates, constitutes and appoints Narendra Borkar and Robert
Kurkiewicz, or either of them, as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact, with
full power to act and with full power of substitution, for him and in his name,
place and stead, to sign such Report and any and all amendments thereto, and to
file said Report and such Amendment as signed, with all Exhibits thereto, with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this Power of
Attorney this 10th day of March, 1998.


                              /s/Dilip S. Shanghvi
                       -----------------------------------
                               DILIP S. SHANGHVI
                       Chairman of the Board and Director


/s/David W. Adamany                        /s/Narendra Borkar
------------------------------------       ------------------------------------
DAVID W. ADAMANY                           NARENDRA BORKAR
Director                                   Director and Chief Executive Officer


/s/David A. Hagelstein                     /s/Jay F. Joliat
------------------------------------       ------------------------------------
DAVID A. HAGELSTEIN                        Jay F. Joliat
Director                                   Director


/s/John R. Morris                          Phyllis Harrison-Ross
------------------------------------       ------------------------------------
JOHN R. MORRIS                             Phyllis Harrison-Ross
Director                                   Director


/s/Shantilal Shanghvi                      /s/Sudir Valia
------------------------------------       ------------------------------------
SHANTILAL SHANGHVI                         SUDIR VALIA
Director                                   Director
DE.PM71Mlmr OF THE ARMY 

BEAJX1UAR1.'ER3 ARM!' SECURITY AGENCY 

WASJJJN(1fON ~5, D C., 

9 1'.&rch 1911-9 

S'OBJEOf: No1iif'1cat1on ot A1.'flJ.1 SecuritJ Agency Technieal Committee Meetimg 

TO: Mr. Frank Rowlett 

CBGAS-90 

1. There v111 be a limited meeting r,t the Arf1J1 Securit7 Agenc7 Technical 

Committee at 1015, 18 Marcb 1911-9, Boom 117, Beaclquarters Building, Arlington · Ball Station. 

2. '!he f'olloving items vill be presented tor consideration b7 the· 

Oomrdttee: 

Bub ~ect Agencies Concerned 

Initiation- ot ~ct 29.70-004, ASA, l'faVJ, tEAI' 

ASAF l, Classification as to 

T)'Pe, and Assigmant of Priority Thereto. · 

Initiation of D/A Pro3eot No. ASA, ?la.V1, lBAF 

29-66 ... 030, DC-la.g Mark II and 

Alphabetic Subatitution Device 

Bev1ev ct Cryptologic Beaearch .l\SA, Nav1, USAF 

and Developmemt ProJecta 

Bev1aw of Intercept end D/P JBA, l'lav7., USAF 

Research and Development 

Projects 

To be Freaentea J?Z: 

Mr. E. Dale Marston 

CBCAS-96 

Code 147 ht 430 

~- .Albert E. llighley 

CSGAS-92 

Cade 147 E.xt 325 

Mr. Ieo Bosen 

CSQAS ... 70 

Code 1~7 Ext 2811. 

i.ro Richard C. lli% 

CSGAS-73 

Code 1.4 7 ht 427 

3. Mamorandllm for the Record ot the Army Security Agenc7 Technical 

COlllDi ttee: Sub3ect: Reviev of' Research and DeTelopment D:ivi4oil Service 

Pro3ec,a, dated 8 March 1911-9, is included. herevith f'or information and record. 

4. In th11 event tbat add1t1caal in:f'ormation with reference to the abm 

noted items is desired prior to presentation, it is requested that the individuals 

:;..r,£'..:1.cated abore be contacted immediately so that questions JDa1 be claritied prior 

to 'Pl'8Bentat1on. 

' 

eclassifi ed and a roved for release b NSA on 08-07-2013 ursuantto E .0. 1352 
• l'i ~~F~~~~~ :•,1 ,t l• ~:· !" ~1~'1• 1.!fH!'·--- 1 ' , I ~ I ! ' • l 

- '. !, .: -.~'.\• ·-· ! I I '' ''iU' I'• .. \'\, 0b~Wli' 

5. In the ravent that :fOW" office is interested in tbs items Jll&Dtioneci aw1l 

a :representative Of JODr Cff'i@s tdlJI. net .be ireasat.11 it ia requeatd. t!lat. the 

Secretmor, Lt. mac c. Bversolti> SI lRoom 31'( Jieaclqwaten, Code 1.47 I ~im 216' 

be aiviser& prier to tllBe date at ~ ll!lletins flt ywr ccncurnnce iD ~uch CM'ltion 

as the cmimittee may take on ttle~® iwao 

4 Iiacl.m. 

l. SlllbCl!l'ID\ lpt #21 

2. S121'bcomm Rpt 122 

3. Subcma Bpt 126 

JOB £ • Gl!lllJiE ~ 

Lt. Colonel,· .fiie~!!.l Ct#']pe 

Chai.ram, ASATO 

4 Msmc tor Record, Sen. Pro.1. 8 Mar Ji.9 

~r;:-:" ~ 

,1, 1 · ' 

I., I . . tll I' 1 

I i :.- .: ' , 'I .. \..:::.:../ _J 

- i . , '.·1 \ : I 

·- ~ I - - I...; '-~ , ,_, - ::::: L
# (

• SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

STAFF REPORT RULE464 ORGANIC CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS

Prepared by: Au Mohamad

Air Pollution Control Engineer Approved by: Aleta Kennard

Supervisor ofTechnical Services

27Rule 464, Organic Chemical Manufacturing Operations

Comments and Responses July 23, 1998, Page 22 

# C

RESPONSE #4 COMMENT#5 RESPONSE #5
COMMENT#6

RESPONSE #6 Section 308 has been deleted from Rule 464.

Section 413.2: Referenced Section 413.4 is missing. There is no Section 413.4. Section 413.2 is revised with the correct section number. The Districtshould demonstratethatthere are no affected sources of any provisions ofthe SOCMI or pharmaceutical CTGs that are not included in Rule 464. Aerojet, Georgia Pacific, and Procter and Gamble are three sources affected by Rule 464. Aerojet manufactures pharmaceutical chemicals which is subjectto pharmaceutical CTG. Rule 464 contains standards which equal or exceed the control requirements in the Pharmaceutical manufacturing CTG. Georgia Pacific manufactures resins which is subjecttothe resin manufacturing CTG; however, since Georgia Pacific is not a major source, Rule 464 is not required to include control requirements from the resin manufacturing CTG. Georgia Pacific met BACT by using an incinerator to control its VOC emissions. The permitted control efficiencyforthe incineratoris 95% by weight. Procter and Gamble manufactures listed SOCMI chemicals and is, therefore, subjectto the SOCMI continuous reactorand distillation CTG. The SOCMI CTG applies to vent streams originating from continuous reactor and distillation operations. For an applicable vent stream, the CTG uses the Total Resource Effectiveness (TRE) index to determine control requirement. Ifthe calculated TRE indexis less than or equal 1 .0, the control requirement is

### VOC reduction by 98 weight-percentorto 20 ppmvofVOC on drybasis, correctedto 3 percent oxygen. Although any control technique can be used, the control requirement in the SOCMI CTG specifiesthermal incineration orflaring in most cases. No controls are required forTRE> 1. The Districtevaluatedthe applicability ofthe SOCMI CTG to Procterand Gamble Sacramento plant with information provided bythe source. Furthermore, the plant has made process improvements which reduce emissions fromthe emission rates used in the TRE calculation.



## L Since all affected vent streams have TRE indexvalues greaterthan 1.0, the implementation of SOCMI CTG provisions will not require controls, therefore, will not result in any emission reduction’ at the Procter and

65
a 

SE 6BU"PEJ~8 85~ 

• 

.L'-AJ .L • 

SECURHY INFORW .. TION 

USCIB: 2'3/58 

27 Ma.7' 1953 

~ORANDUK FQR THE MDIBISW OF USCIB: 

Subject: Ult/US Conference on Allied (NATO) Comuni· 

cations Secur1t7. 

1., The members ot the United. States Ccnmm1 catians 

Intelligence Board are cordialll' invited to attend the 

Opelling Plena17 Session of the U.IC./U.So Contarmce OD 

Allied (NATO) Comunicationa 8ecurit7, to be held at 

1000 hours- S June 1953, in the Lounge, at the Naval 

Security Station, 3801 lebruka Avenue, H.w.,. 

Washington, Do C. 

USCIB: 23/SS 

RUFUS L. TAYLOR 

Captain- Uo s •. Rav 

Executive Secretar,r, USCIB 

24 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-09-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

SECRET
---- .. 

. . 

aljBJJCT 1 nlsoii, Joseph·-~ 

1. Back.ground data available :1n .tiles ~' 

losaph liqmond ~ 

Al3 Greenmor.mt Doulovarcl 

:t>qtm, Chio 

DOB I 23 liq' 1907 

1081 Dqtan, Ohio 

IPWmcm: - u.s .:1.1., 1929, 11ldvel'a1tJ' or Dqt,on, Ohio 

BfLQ!DlC 

1925 • 29 • (part-time) Dq-Fan Electrio Oo., Dayton, Ohio 

.1929 .. J' • 9tJDoral. '.a)tol'@ Radio Corp., D..,t.on. Ohio 

:t933 - 1935 - !elecara La.boratoriee, D«Jtcm,, Ohio 

·1935 - 19.30 • Frigidaire Diviaim ot General Motara • D&;Jtcm., Ohio 

19.38 .. Present national Cash Jlcs1&Jter co. (lle.nager at lleotrioa1 

lese3Zch Ie.b) 

2. A •at!anal .teenq check was accompl.iahed ~ QUI 16 llq 19421 the 

notation that CNO doea not object to employment or sub3ect 1a dated 18 

Jrovembar 1940. 

'• According to Central IDdax lila oheok cm 10 April 1951, lfUbj eot 

was cleared t~ MO!'et en 9 leb 1951 1{;' Bqa, .l1r llator1el Command, 'frieht• 

J'atteraon .Air J'"o:r:oe l3ase1 Da.yton, Ohio. 

4• On 17 jpril 1951, thia SiOJlGY' :requeated a CCJW' Of clearance, COW' 

of l'lll, and copy at &JV' !DvestJ,aation perf'orx:ied Oil r;u.bject at Wr;t&ht-:PattOl"•OD 

..ATB1 Dqtcm.1 Ohio. 

C. Lo IUEOB 

I • 

Y ~ ,,/t I' a ""'f I .,, '"'""' ..
EXHIBIT 23.01


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd.
 Detroit, Michigan
  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of: the 1993 Stock Option Plan and the 1999 Equity Participation Plan (File No. 333-104429) and the 2008 Equity Participation Plan (File No. 333-158469) of our reports dated May 23, 2010, with respect to the financial statements of Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd., and the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2010.
 
 
 Troy, Michigan
/s/ Rehmann Robson P.C.May 23, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL14-33-000]

                    On April 17, 2014, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. EL14-33-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation to determine the justness and reasonableness of DATC Path 15, LLC's proposed transmission revenue requirement reduction.                     *DATC Path 15, LLC,*                     147 FERC ¶ 61,035 (2014).                

                    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL14-33-000, established pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication of this notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: February 23, 2015.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-04082 Filed 2-26-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
REF ID:A57750 

USOIB: 5.4/22 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE ME!MBERS OF USCIB: 

IV 

--· ,.; J ' , 

2 March 1955 

Subject: Approval of USCIB 5.4/20 dated 10 February 1955. 

No objection hav~g been raised to the subject paper prior to 

1200, 23 February 1955, the USCIBEC decision referred to therein is 

considered approved by USCIB. 

USCID: 5.4/22 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

24 

.... ~... -

- . .
REF ID:A2794173 ------- - -

+-- -~ 

'-r/ 

,, 

AFSA-123/RVW/mm 

subjocta 

28 Maroll 1951 

Request tor the Assigmuent ef securttJ 

uatch personnel. 

1. A conference simll.a .. to tho one le.at fall Vill be 

held dur1D5 the period 11 through 20 ApFil 1951. 

2. It ls requested that tvo rated enlisted men, one 

of whom should. be a Haste!t Sergeant or equivalent, bo 'Bestgned 

as seour1t:r \rat.oh Officers for the above period of time (less saturday attemoon an6. Sunda1). 

3. . It io requested that the pe~sonnel assigned be di~ectad 

to ~port tc Lt. W1ooarver, .APSA-123, Room 19-211, who will 

furniah dota1led 1natruct1ons for standing the vntehes. 

]a Wa PEARSOri4 

lieutenant, USN 

Head, Liaison Branch 

·1 " i 

! 

' i 

I . ,I 

·I 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 05-15-2014 pursuant to E .0. 13526--- - - - --~
#### EDWARD S. CARTER AND OTHERS *ayainst*MADISON GREENWOOD.

Where the heirs-at-law and next of kin of a deceased person, took possession of his estate and divided it out among themselves, and sold some of it, it was *Held*thS,t the Court of Equity could not protect them by restraining an administrator, regularly appointed, from recovering- the property in actions at law.

This was an appeal from the Court of Equity of Buncombe county, on a decretal order, made by Heatii, J., at the last Spring Term.

The plaintiffs are the next of kin and heirs-at-law of Samuel Carter, who died intestate in Buncombe county. It is alledged in the plaintiffs’ bill, that for the purpose of saving the expense and trouble of a regular administration, they came to an arrangement and understanding among, themselves, by which to settle and divide the estate of the said intestate ; that they paid off most of the debts of the estate— some of them took the real estate for their share, and the others the slaves and other property for *theirs;*that several of them had conveyed their property, thus acquired, and made deeds of conveyance for the same; that the defendant having i small debt of about thirty-five dollars, had applied to thé bounty Court and obtained letters of administration on the ¡state; that in virtue thereof, he had commenced actions of .rover against the recipients of the slaves, and were urging the same to judgment. The prayer of the bill is for an injunc*411tion to restrain the defendant from further carrying on these suits, the plaintiffs offering to submit to a decree for the amount due the defendant.

The defendant answered, explaining the reason of his taking the course attributed to him by the plaintiffs, but from the view taken of the case, the matters set forth are immaterial. On the coming in of the answer, the injunction, which had been issued, was ordered to be dissolved, and the plaintiffs appealed.

*Avery-,*for the plaintiffs.

*JV. W.*Woodjm, *J. W. Woodjm*and Gaither, for defendant

PeaRson, O. J.

There is no error in the decretal order appealed from. By the plaintiffs’ own showing, “ for the purpose of saving the expense and trouble of a regular administration,” they took possession of the estate of Samuel Carter and divided it out among themselves; thus acting in direct violation of the statute, which prohibits such an irregular in-termeddling with the estate of a deceased person, and subjects the parties to a penalty. It follows that the courts cannot aid or protect them from the consequences of their own illegal acts. This is settled, *Ramsay*v. *Woodward,*3 Jones 508; *Sharp*v. *Tanner,*4 Dev. and Bat. 122. The case admits of no further discussion at this stage of the proceeding.

Pbk Cubiam, Decretal order affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Willis

JERRY KENNETH KAIN MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 0951-98-3 PER CURIAM NOVEMBER 17, 1998 EUNICE P. KAIN

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF AMHERST COUNTY J. Michael Gamble, Judge (William F. Quillian III, on brief), for appellant. (Arelia S. Langhorne, on brief), for appellee.

Jerry Kenneth Kain (husband) appeals the decision of the circuit court awarding spousal support to Eunice P. Kain (wife). Husband contends that the trial court erred in (1) awarding wife $725 in monthly spousal support; and (2) disbelieving husband's testimony as to his income. Upon reviewing the record and briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the decision of the trial court.

See Rule 5A:27. The record does not contain a transcript of the hearing on husband's motion to reduce spousal support. However, the trial court ordered both husband's proposed Statement of Facts and wife's Objections to Written Statement of Facts be included as a part of the record on appeal.

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.- 2 - Based upon the record before us, we find no evidence that husband preserved any issues for appeal. The decree granting husband's motion to reduce spousal support was endorsed by husband's counsel under the notation "I Ask For This." No objections were noted, and no motions for reconsideration or rehearing were filed. The written statement of facts contains no indication that the husband made any objection. Therefore, we find that husband failed to preserve these issues for appeal.

See Rule 5A:18; Lee v. Lee , 12 Va. App. 512, 404 S.E.2d 736 (1991) ( en banc ) Accordingly, the decision of the circuit court is summarily affirmed. Affirmed

.
- - . - . .- .... ~, . 

REF ID:A67909 

T01°8BCRET 24 

USCIB·: 5 • 2/ 6'.3 4 November 1954 

'i'OP SEl0ftFJf - 'f:J. S. ErES 6NLY 

I 

UNITED STATES COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE :OOARD 

AGENDA FOR 

One Hundred Ninth Meeting at 1430, on Frid~, 

12 November 1954, in the Projection Room, 

Administration Building, CIA, Washington, D.C. 

EQ:3.3(h)(2) 

PL86:::36/50 USC 3605 

Mr. Allen W. Dulles, Chairman 

Date of .Initial Subject 

Consi.dera.tion Number 

15 Oct 1954 29.14/ 

12 Nov 1954 29.9/ 

12 Nov 1954 29.11/ 

12 Nov 1954 

12 Nov 1954 29.19/ 

PART I - Agenda Items 

Subject 

4. USCIB Master Requirements 

List (USCIB 9.3/11) 

* Paper in preparation by CIA Member. 

Sutmitted by 

Director, NSA 

Director, NSA 

CIA Member 

Director, NSA 

Exec. Secy. 

** May be withdrawn prior to meeting if agr~ement reached informally. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-30-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

USCIB: 5.2/63 

TOPSEatET 
USCIB: 5.2/63 

REF ID:A67909 

TOP SECRET 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

'fOP SEiOREH' - e.s. m:ES ONbY PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

PART II - Background Information Ori Agenda Items 

Item No. Subject and Summaty 

l. JAt the 107th meeting of USCIB this 

subJect. was reopenedor consideration by virtue of a 

memorandl.DD from I.SIB (USCIB 29.14/19). Discussion of the 

subject is reported in USCIB 29.14/20. USCIB 29.14/21 

contains further recormnendations by the Director, NSA, and 

has been distributed pursuant toUSCIB decision at the 

107th meeting. 

2. I Based upon a decision by 

USCIBEC at its 19th meeting (see USCIB 29.9/4), approved by 

USCIB (USCIB 29.9/5), discussions with General Musco were 

held. USCIB '}!J.9/8, which indicates the nature of these 

discussions, will be supplemented. by an oral report by 

General Ackerman. 

3. I 1 Background inf onna tion is containea: in USCIB 29.11/8, su~itted by the Director, NSA. 

Additional paper on subject, to be subnitted by CIA member, 

is now in preparation and will be distributed at earliest 

possible date. 

4. USCIB Master Requirements List,: At. the time of publication 

of the USCIB Master Requirements List (dated 3 July 1953) 

it was agreed that the List would be reviewed at a later 

date to determine the ext:.ent to which it satisfies existing 

requirements, and to consider any amendments which might 

assist the National Security Agency- in the production of 

intelligence based thereon. The comments of the Director, 

National Security Agency are contained in USCIB 9.3/11. 

5. Current status or this 

problem and references to earlier discussions are contained 

in USCIB 29.19/8. 

THIS DOCUMEN'JI' CONTAINS CCMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION AND SHALL 

BE HANDLED ONLY IN CHANNELS EXPRESSLY PROVIDED FOR COMINT. 

USCIB: 5.2/63 - 2 -

,. 

-L~ Captain, U.S. Navy 

Executive Secretary, USCIB 

To .. nsECRBT
# CE2004070EN.01026701.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/267 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/267

---

(2004/C 70 E/291)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3931/03

by Paulo Casaca (PSE) to the Commission

(16 December 2003)

Subject:   Rehabilitation of areas devastated by the summer 2003 forest fires in Portugal

Subject:

The summer 2003 forest fires in Portugal devastated 410 000 hectares, i.e. 5 % of Portugal's landmass and 12 % of its woodlands, destroying numerous Natura 2000 Network areas, various cork oak, holm oak and oak forests, causing numerous deaths, destroying homes, killing animals and destroying crops in some of the country's most fragile and deprived rural regions.

Support provided under the aegis of the Solidarity Fund, although extremely useful, is nowhere like equal to the enormous task of rehabilitating incalculably valuable natural heritage on this scale, and a rural economy which is under threat of total disappearance.

At the Budgetary Committee meeting which discussed the Solidarity Fund contribution to Portugal, it was claimed that a total of EUR 180 million was going to be reprogrammed from Portuguese Structural Funds to cope with the challenge.

Could the Commission explain:

| 1. | Why amounts programmed for the 2000-2003 Structural Funds, and not yet taken up, cannot be reprogrammed to this end? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Why amounts programmed for the 2000-2003 Structural Funds, and not yet taken up, cannot be reprogrammed to this end?

| 2. | Whether the Portuguese authorities have already submitted specific proposals for reprogramming the EUR 180 million, and whether this amount is earmarked for rehabilitating the natural heritage and the rural economy of the areas devastated? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Whether the Portuguese authorities have already submitted specific proposals for reprogramming the EUR 180 million, and whether this amount is earmarked for rehabilitating the natural heritage and the rural economy of the areas devastated?

| 3. | What other means it thinks could be used to support this rehabilitation which, while of direct concern to Portugal, is of no less concern to Europe? |
| --- | --- |

3.

What other means it thinks could be used to support this rehabilitation which, while of direct concern to Portugal, is of no less concern to Europe?

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(14 January 2004)

(14 January 2004)

The Commission is collecting the information it needs to answer the question. It will communicate its findings as soon as possible.

---