alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             843
<SECURITIES>                                     2,833
<RECEIVABLES>                                      292
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        213
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,480
<PP&E>                                          15,573
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,635
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,639
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           389
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,465
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,416
<SALES>                                          4,456
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,456
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,144
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    341
<INCOME-TAX>                                       141
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       200
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05


</TABLE>
# CE2004084EN.01032601.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/326 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/326

---

(2004/C 84 E/0383)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0174/04

by Christopher Heaton-Harris (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(29 January 2004)

Subject:   Commission's accounting systems

Subject:

I understand the Internal Audit Service, in a report entitled ‘IAS Review of the Commission's Accounting Framework — Final Report’ dated 15 April 2003, made a number of recommendations to the Commission regarding the accounting systems.

How has the Commission ensured that the necessary human resources, IT infrastructure and organisational structures are in place for the reform of the accounting framework?

---
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 6.1

EPS Calculation

The following schedule summarizes the information used to compute earnings per
common share:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            Years ended December 31,
                                                             -----------------------------------------------------
                                                                 2001                  2000               1999
                                                             ------------           -----------        -----------
         <S>                                                 <C>                    <C>                <C>
         Weighted average number of common
           shares used to compute basic net
           income per common share                            142,962,000           142,040,000        140,317,000
         Dilutive effect of stock options                       2,093,000             3,031,000          1,869,000
                                                              -----------           -----------        -----------
         Weighted average number of common
           shares used to compute diluted net
           income per common share                            145,055,000           145,071,000        142,186,000
                                                              ===========           ===========        ===========
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 24.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Optimal Robotics Corp. (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that to the best of the undersigned's knowledge:

      1)    the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
            31, 2002 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
            Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Dated:   March 27, 2003                     /s/ Neil S. Wechsler
                                            --------------------
                                                 Neil S. Wechsler
                                                 Co-Chairman and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer







                                       97
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                           9,711
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  121,673
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,824
<INVENTORY>                                     47,326
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               194,061
<PP&E>                                         194,048
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,795
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 753,479
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          141,883
<BONDS>                                        686,118
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           315
<OTHER-SE>                                   (137,963)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   753,479
<SALES>                                        222,326
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               222,326
<CGS>                                          122,575
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  122,575
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   635
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,521
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,082
<INCOME-TAX>                                       669
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                413
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       413
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.01
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Robert L. Allbritton, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RiggsNational Corporation (the “registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and proceduresto be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any changes in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s quarter ended March 31,2004, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to
 

 

  the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   Date: April 29, 2004      /S/ ROBERT L. ALLBRITTON
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,273
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      218
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        185
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,959
<PP&E>                                          16,364
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,297
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,140
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           389
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,568
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,753
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,498
<CGS>                                            2,093
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,738
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  48
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (218)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (38)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (180)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (180)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
7~t, 19.51 

a.aeiwd fl'm Captdn lm7 c. trme one oopy ot •Bepoiit, ot thti USCIB 

.&4 Boo Comlttee to th:! T1n1ted 'Jt:-rt.ea ec.-nmic:it:1ono JntelUgence 

laard on Panuguoae eo.mm';oation sec:ur!:twr. 21 pape 

0COP SEGRE) 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-17-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 

OGA 
' REF ID:A67206. 

WOP 3E:CRE:ll .. , I~· I ' • A "' ._ "..t.• ICC... oll 

7 Aupat 1951 

a..lftll trcm Captain llu7 C. r.n. amt OOj.17 Qf 81aport ot the lJSCIB 

Ad Boe ea.ittee to the United States Ooanaf.oatioftll Intelligence 

Board on Portuguese Comr.nmioation S8CD1"1tJ'. :?1 papa 

prilzation 

! ,• 

'• 

\ 

\ 

I 

I 

\ 

' \ 

0COP SECRElJ 
• REF ID:A67206. 

~ '·.. y , ... 1 .. (' 

... i;...'.la 

7 August 19.51 

Baoe1w4 troll Captain laz7' C.·Lane one cow ot •laport of the USCIB 

Ad Hoc Committee to the United States Communications Intellieence 

Board on Portuguese Communication Seauri'Q'. 21 papa 

Organization 

D OF' $C:CRE1 
- --- --

• REF ID:A67206 

I • ' • ... I" 

" j, 1 I :i 1 ,.,~f ,:,( • 

., J.ugut 1951 

Beoe1ft4 f:roa Captain~ C. Lane one COP7 ot •a.port, of the UBClB 

Ad. Hoo Committee 'to the lld.tecl Sta-tea ColllllUld.Cllticme Intall!pDce 

Board on Portugueea Ccmnmication Secmi.t7. 21 papa 

OCOP ~ECRE1 
FRCJl: AFSA--02X 

TO: AFSA-ooT 

REF ID:A67206 ..-

TOP SECREI 

Dat~~£/ z ' ( 

Receipt is hereby acknowledged of the following document: 

Repart o:f' USCIB Coordinator to USCIB on Portuguese 

Conmunication Security (no copy number) 

-- ---1 

-"~&.~40~~ Signature of ad~or his agent 

TOP SECRET 
REF ID:A67206-

~~ 

____ Ct& __ ~~-,~. 

/f/4-rO 

-~ -_,_ (' p>J_'T/ 

-------------------------------------------- - -------- ---- ------------------ ---------
• TOP sE5tEf>~ 

19 March 1954 

PARTIAL LlST OF COMINT MATERIAL INVOLVED Ill THE 

AIRCRAFT CRASH AT KEFLAVIK. ICELAND, 22 AUGUST 1953 

PIT Report - Non morse items of interest {Including identification 

characteristics and transmissions of interest) 

Turnpike #85 {Raw Tra.f'fic-classif'ied Confidential) 

lncluding: 

1025 messages .. 011 messages 26 messages 

2 messages 

6 messages 

1. Study of Water Levels \an··.. d Tendencies of the ..... I 

and its tributaries during the period 16-31 May 53. ------- 2. Ice conditions i'qr the S -----.,...-------'\ for the 

period 11-25 March 53. OA._ _____ __, 

Letter to :FVPU(LANT), 73/L/32 dtd 12 August 1953, containing Weekly 

Weather Notes of 5 August 1953 and H. o. Pub. 206, RADIO 'WEATHER AIDS, 

1952 edition, Volumes I and II, Change No. l to Volume/I and Changes 

Nos. 1 and 2 to Volume II. 

Weekly Weather Notes to USA 51, 10th \.RSM. Weekly Weather Motes dated 

5 August 1953. 

NSA 90 INTERIM REPORT 1/67 

(1 Copy) 1-· #J.O to AFSA-24 #828 - ) 

NSA 90 INTERIM REPORT /170 .Amend. #2 \to AFSA-24i#J.250 - j I 

NSA 90 INTERIM REPORT /fJ3 Amend. #2 to{ 

I 

- 1-

Enclosure w/USGIB 13.5/43 dtd 19 Iv'JB.I' 54. 

',~/ 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

I 

eclassifi ed and a ursuantto E .0. 1352 
... 

Subject: Partial List 0£ COMINT Material Involved in the Aircraft 

Crash at Keflavik, Iceland, 22 August 195.3. 

--------~----------------------------

NSA 90 Dm:RIM REPORT #97 

NSA 90 Weekly Technice.l Notes 1/1, Section 1, Part 1 (1 Copy} 

NSA 90 Weekly Technical Notes /11, Section 1, Part 3 (2 Copies) 

NSA 90 Weekly Tecl:mical Notes ./11, Section 1, Part 3 Supplement (2 Copies) 

NSA 90 Weekly Technical Notes 1/1., Section 1, Part 5 (2 Copies) 

NSA 90 Weekly Technical Notes 1/1, Section 2, Part 2 (2 Copies) 

NSA 90 Weekly Technical Notes 1/1, Section 2, Part 2 Supplement (2 Copies) 

' NSA 90 Weekly Technical Notes l/!2., Section 1, Part 4 (1 Copy) 

NSA 90 Weekly Technical Notes #2, Section 1, Part 5 (2 Copies) 

NSA 90 Weekly Technical Notes #2, Section 1, Part 6 (1 Copy) 

NSA 72 INTERIM REPORT 1/1678 (Part I) 

(1 copy) 

NSA 72 INTERIM REPORT #1678 (Part II) 

(1 copy) 

Current Cryptanalytic Techniques 

General Concepts 

CUrrent Cryptanalytic Techniques 

Specific Types of Systems 

NSA 72 INTERIM REPORT #1678 (Part III) Gurrent Cryptanalytic Techniques 

Problems and S.olutions 

Proposed Master File SheetsJ .... _____________ Jc1 of each) 

Master File Sheets,1 .... _______ ....... 

01212/?~ (fully quoted and discussed) 

,... 2 -

(1 or eacb) 

(1 or each) 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

TOP SECRET FROTH 
.. • 

REF ID:A59~ 

TOP SECRET FRO 14 i 

!OP 8B6I9.F mei!'H 

Subject: Partial List of COMINT Material Involved in the Aircraft 

Crash at Keflavik, Iceland, 22 August 1953. 

Details o:r J OOMINT FPNs and their occurrences. 

Queries regar~ I OOMINT Order of Battle. 

Articles, gists and comments based on the following: 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

- 3 -

TOP SECRET FROTt-i
FINAL 

'fOP ~EOM'f OANOE - 3E6l:ffi:I'fY INf'OftM'Ai'ION • 't:J. 9. E'fEi9 OffLY 

SUBJECT NUMBER 

USCIB: 23/76 

Subject: 

Additional Item (B) (Not on Agenda) for the 89th 

Meeting of USCIB, held on 14 August 1953. 

Allied (NATO) Communications Security 

MR. ARMSTR~G said that he was prepared to report on progress made 

since the last meeting in connection with the French Problem. He informed the members that a staff paper, which incorporated a three-phase 

plan, had been prepared in his Department and had been approved by the 

Secretary and Under Secretary. He outlined briefly the phases of the 

plan, as follows: 

Phase I -- An approach to the French Government at the cabinet 

level by the US and UK Ambassadors designed to secure 

agreement in principle (1) that a broad program be 

undertaken through the NATO Standing Group to improve 

the security of the national communications of NATO 

countries and (2) that this program should be 

preceded by the development and application of 

adequate COMSEC standards on a Tripartite (US-UKFrench) basis. 

Phase II -- Use of the existing Tripartite Security Working Group 

as a means to select appropriate and authoritative 

COMSEC representatives of the three governments who 

would com.pose a technical subgroup to develop and 

apply adequate COMS:EC standards within the three governments. 

Phase III -- Direct contact between these COMSEC representatives. 

He continued by saying that the Secretary had felt, when he discussed 

the matter with him, that the precarious political situation in France 

at the present time made it undesirable to approach them until the 

outcome of the crisis was somewhat clearer. He voiced the Secretary's 

request that the Board withhold an actual approach to the French for a 

few weeks until the governmental situation became more firm. 

MR. ARMSTRONG expressed his opinion that it would take several 

weeks to complete preliminary arrangements and be in a position to 

brief the Ambassadors, and suggested, therefore, that the work of the 

Executive Committee not be unduly de~ed. 

CAPTAIN TAYLOR, inquiring as to the degree of urgency, asked if 

the paper being prepared should be considered by the Executive 

Committee at its next meeting (20 August), or at a su~sequent meeting. 

USCIB: 23/76 - 5 -

TOP SECRET CANOE 

Jeclassified and approved for 

elease by NSA on 07-07-2014 

Jursuantto E .0. 13526 
.. REF ID:A58521 

~p SECRET CANOI • SECURll t tiqPOltlllb\"f'tet~ It 

S!iSBfH'H INFORIMlON = e.s. EY-.l!iS ONLY . 

USCIB: 23/76 

After a brief discussion, in which it was brought out by Mr. 

Packard that the British were somewhat ahead of us in these preparations, it was agreed that the Executive Conunittee would consider the 

matter at the 20 August meeting. 

DECISION: (14 August 19,3) USCIB noted the presentation made by the 

Department of State member and agreed that the Executive Cor!l!I1ittee 

would consider the Department paper at its next meeting, on 20 August 

1953. 

USCIB: 23/76 - 6 -

TOP SECRET CANOE
# CE2004084EN.01019902.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/199 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/199

---

(2004/C 84 E/0243)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0338/04

by Eluned Morgan (PSE) to the Commission

(4 February 2004)

Subject:   Food safety

Subject:

Is it true that the EFSA has approved the use of GM corn (NK603)? Did the ESFA conduct new and impartial investigations into the safety of the food? How much, if any, of the information necessary for a safety evaluation was provided by companies with a vested interest in the product?

How can the ESFA give assurances on the safety of food if it relies upon the experiments conducted by companies with a vested interest in the product?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(27 February 2004)

(27 February 2004)

At the request of the Commission, the European Food Security Authority (EFSA), an independent risk assessment body, issued a scientific opinion on the genetically modified (GM) NK 603 maize where it concluded that it is as safe as conventional maize and, therefore, that its import for processing for food and feed use is unlikely to have an adverse effect on human or animal health. Approval of the maize is the responsibility of the Commission pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 1997 concerning novel foods and novel food ingredients (1) and to Directive 2001/18/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms (2).

1

2

The Regulation provides that the applicant submits the necessary information to carry out the safety evaluation. This is a standard approach to product authorisation. In preparing its opinion of 25 November 2003 (3), the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms which is composed of highly qualified independent experts had, in addition to the documentation provided by the applicant, access to independent, peer-reviewed studies which were taken into account in reaching its conclusion and which are referenced in the opinion.

3

---

(1)  OJ L 43, 14.2.1997.

1

(2)  OJ L 106, 17.4.2001.

2

(3)  http://www.efsa.eu.int/pdf/gmo/opinion_gmo_02_final_en.pdf

3

---