alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
steam_record - Re: Request for partial extension of the ICR deadline 

 

Greetings, 

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent 

guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case 

basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date

of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, 

-----"Johnson, Linden Printz" <lpjohnson@tva.gov> wrote: ----- 

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Johnson, Linden Printz" <lpjohnson@tva.gov> 

Date: 06/23/2010 03:31PM 

cc: "Johnson, Linden Printz" <lpjohnson@tva.gov> 

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Johnson, Linden Printz" <lpjohnson@tva.gov>

Date: 6/28/2010 3:03 PM

Subject: Re: Request for partial extension of the ICR deadline

CC: <steam_record@erg.com>, <jordan.ronald@epa.gov>

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C28B9C4D... 2/23/2011
Subject: Request for partial extension of the ICR deadline 

Dear Ms. Jezebele,

Please consider this request for an extension of the ICR deadline for certain TVA

facilities.  I appreciate your assistance on this and look forward to your response.  If

you have any questions about our request, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

Lindy Johnson

Lindy Johnson, Manager 

Water Permits and Compliance 

1101 Market Street, LP 5D 

Chattanooga, TN 37402 

lpjohnson@tva.gov 

(423) 751-3361 office 

(423) 751-7011 fax 

 

[attachment "ICR extension request.pdf" removed by Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US] 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C28B9C4D... 2/23/2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,636,427
<SECURITIES>                                 5,362,205
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,521,015
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                  7,288,265
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,126,361
<PP&E>                                       3,911,110
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,860,942
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,176,529
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,137,629
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       631,906
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,362,070
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,176,529
<SALES>                                     18,196,524
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,196,524
<CGS>                                        7,238,298
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,475,381
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (194,431)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                915,574
<INCOME-TAX>                                   302,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            613,574
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   613,574
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
.. 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25, D. c. 10 March 19 55 

'EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

q,igp Si~ PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB 

SUBJECT: Intercept Site Burvey,._I __ __..___, 

1. '!he establishment and operat1cm at a ~J. 8.\ Communications 

Intelligence ( COMINT) installation uJ / J is reg_uired as an 

integral pa.rt of my over..all scheme/'for :f'Urnishing fUl.l support to the 

National COMIN'l' effort. The respOXJ.sibility for evenWa,l implementation 

of this project has been vested in the u.. S. Air ForcE!. Recent 

developments indicate that an approach to the I I Government for 

U. s. COMINT base rights is now: warrant.ed. 

2. Accordingly, I consid.er it appropriate that every effort be 

ma.de to proceed without delay in the procurement of those bases considered essential. in support of the National COMINT effort. Therefore, 

I have requested that the/U. S. Air Force proceed with plans to perform 

a technical site survey inl lin order to determine the sites 

considered most Sui.table for intercept installations. I plan to augment 

the Air Force survey team with experienced NSA technicians. 

3. The U. s. Air Force will forward through the Department of' 

Defense a. request that the Department of State undertake negotiations 

wi·th thel !Government 1n order to obtain di'oloma.tic permission to 

conduct the site survey. 

4. I consider it appropriate to have USCIB inform the London 

Signal Intelligence Board of this action. To is end, I shall inf'orm. 

7ou when the initial approach has bee de. 

'.feP 1 CONTROL NO. 550150-A 

COPY: 6( OF li.b. COPIES 

PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES 

Declassified and approved for release bv NSA on 05-15-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

TOP SECRET
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             603
<SECURITIES>                                     1,699
<RECEIVABLES>                                      165
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        268
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,543
<PP&E>                                          15,439
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,184
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,021
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           389
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,043
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,000
<SALES>                                          4,054
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,054
<CGS>                                              967
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,926
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  21
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    140
<INCOME-TAX>                                        62
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 78
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        78
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
USOIB: 14/259 

'l'pP SBCRST - spurn !1!POft1!m1! 

MBHQRANJlll FOR THI~ MEMSBBS f1I U§QIB& 

1 DecaDber 19S2 

Subjecta u.s. Indootrinaticn Totals. 

The incloaure 1a 1'0l'Wa1'decl tor intomat.iono 

Inclosure - 1 

UC ti 000484 dtd 

24 Nov 52, 

USCIB: 14/259 

JCBS 

Secretar.r. USOIB 

TOP SECRET 

£)05 t{f(' 

C!./s Q.B.,1-\."-' 

p/p ;x.&. 

24 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 09-04-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
• TcYt~¥T 

CENTRAL IHTELLIGENCE AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25, D.C. 

OFFICE OF THE DIRmroR 

ua II 000484 

24 Ncwaber 1952 

MpfORANDOM FOR THE CHAIHHAN. LCJfDOH SJGHAL D'l'BLLIOlliCE BOARDi 

Subject: Uo s. Indootr.lnat:lcn Total.a. 

lo Pursuant to Paragraph 20 ot Appendix B to tb~ Br1t.1ebu.s. Intelligence Agre...-it, th• u.s. tot;ala ot 1ndoct.rinated 

peraomel aa ot lS October 19S2 are forwarded herewitho 

2. In addition to the liat ot 3,894 conaumera aet torl;h 

1n the 1ncloaure9 a total or 17,793 othei" 1ndoctr1nMS (inolud-

~:= sr~~=·~ E~ nel 2ls687• EO 3.3(h)(2) 

IncloeUff - l 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

I•/ Walter B. Smith 

WALTER B. SMITH 

Cha11Wll, United Stat• Cew11n\caticna 

In\el.11gaace Board 

u.s. Indoctrination Total.a 

(Cenaumen) as ct 

15 Oct 52e 

Incloeure with USCIB 14/259 elated 1 December 1952. 

TOP SECRET 
p. S. INDOCTRINATION Tetr#S (Consumers) 

AS OF 15 OCTOBER 1952 

STATE 

ApPJ:OXima:te Total 

171 

ARMY 

NAVY 

Secretaey ot De.tense 

Asst Chief' ot Stat£, G-21 Intelligence 

Asst Chiet ot Statr, G-3, Operations Joint stat.t 

overseas Recipients (Including Special 

Securit7 Officers) 

Miscellaneous {Includes Of'f'ice ot Chiet of 

Stat!'; Office or Sect7 ot Arley'; Chief' 

Signal Otf'icsr; etc.) 

ONI 

OPNAV (less ONI) 

CINCPAC 

COMNAVF1~ 

CINCNEIM 

CINCLANT 

lst Fleet; 

6th Fleet 

7th Fleet 

CINCAL I 

COMNAVFORGER 

NA Londcm 

CINCFE 

CINCARIB 

CINCSOOTH 

U.S. CINC.E.1JR 

SHAPE 

SECNAV 

SEC DEF 

JCS 

MARCORPS {Hqs) 

CIA 

Miscellaneous (Includes NRL~ ~. WSEn, etc.) 

TOP SECRET 

36 

328 

47 

22 

318 

71 

822 

251 

65 

63 

41 

so 

'Z'l 

7 

16 

9 

4 

4 

3 

3 

2 

2 

1 

1 

8 

5 

14 

s 

2 

15 

598 
AIR FORCE 

Of'i'ice ot the SECDEF 

Air Aide to the President 

JCS 

Q.ffice of Secty, U.S. Air Force 

Directorate ot Intelligence 

Hq., USAF (Other than D/I) 

Major Canmands 

Liaiscn Personnel in Canada 

Liaison Personnel in England 

Engineering Research Associates. Inc. 

Haller, Raymond & Brow. Inc. 

The Rand Corporation 

Bell Telephone Laboratories 

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY 

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 

-2-

8 

l 

16 

13 

247 

57 

237 

2 

s 

2 

.3 

6 

1 

TOTAL 

TOP SECRET 

601 

1656 

46 

3894
REF ID:A60373 

TOPSECR:ET e • 

'f6P ffi51BilEf = l-J. S • l!i¥ES ON±.¥ 

SUBJECT NUMBER 

USCIB: 29.19/9 

Subject: 

Item 2 of the Agenda for the 19th Meeting of USCIBEC, 

held on 21 September 1954. 

CCMINT Arrangements with Third Parties.I 

(USCIB 29.19/1; 29.19/4). L....-------' 

The CHAIRMAN invited comments on this item, pointing out that no 

reply has yet been received to the cable sent to LSIB.as result of an 

earlier USCIB decision. 

MR. POLYZOIDES proposed that, since no reply has been received, 

consideration of this item be postponed until a subsequent meeting. 

The members agreed. 

DECISION: (21 September 1954) USCIBEC agreed to postpone consideration 

of the problem raised in USCIB 29.19/1 and 29.19/4 until a reply to 

USCIB•s query to LSIB is received. 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

USCIB: 29.19/9 - 4 -

TtJPSe<JRBT 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-15-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-10580

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VICTOR LAMONT TROTTY,

also known as Victor Lamont, 

also known as Pinkie Trotty, 

also known as Pinkie Lope, 

also known as Pinky Trotty,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:01-CR-107-1-C

--------------------

February 20, 2003

Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Victor

Lamont Trotty has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Trotty has filed a response to counsel’s brief. Our

independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Trotty’s
No. 02-10580

-2-

response shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this

appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
----

(2004/C 84 E/0126)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3779/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject:   Update on funding for the municipality of Terni under the action programme to promote civil protection

In reply to my earlier question E-1103/03 (1) asking whether the municipality of Terni had submitted projects and obtained funding under the action programme to promote civil protection, the Commission said on 22 April 2003 that the municipality had not submitted any application.

Can the Commission say whether, since that date, any projects have been submitted and what the outcome was?

----

(1)OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 144.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,127,000
<SECURITIES>                                   991,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,724,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,986,000
<PP&E>                                      55,918,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (24,005,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,899,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,986,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,389,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,899,000
<SALES>                                     10,063,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,063,000
<CGS>                                        8,985,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,985,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (118,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,011,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (354,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            657,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   657,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6892

ANTHONY W. JEFFERSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CA-98-145)

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 20, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony W. Jefferson, Appellant Pro Se. Vaughan Christopher Jones,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony W. Jefferson seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. Jefferson v. Virginia Parole

Board, No. CA-98-145 (E.D. Va. June 16, 1998). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Luis Valencia, Appellant, v Anita Calero, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[773 NYS2d 295]

Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered February 20, 2003, which, in this personal injury action alleging Labor Law violations, reversed so much of an order of the Civil Court, New York County (Donna Recant, J.), entered May 7, 2002, as denied defendant Anita Calero’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and granted said cross motion and dismissed the complaint as against her, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellate Term correctly concluded that Calero’s entitlement to the exemption from liability set forth in Labor Law § 240 (1) for owners of one-family dwellings who do not direct or control the injury-producing work had been established as a matter of law. That Calero picked out the type and color of paint, indicated to plaintiff the areas that needed painting and purchased roll*255ers, brushes and paint pans, does not demonstrate that Calero controlled or directed plaintiff in the method and manner of his painting work *(see Pesa v Ginsberg,*186 AD2d 521 [1992]).

Although Calero used her one-family apartment for business as well as residential purposes, her entitlement to the statutory exemption was not impaired by the dual use since the painting work done by plaintiff was directly related to the apartment’s residential use *(see Bartoo v Buell,*87 NY2d 362, 368 [1996]; *Cannon v Putnam,*76 NY2d 644, 650 [1990]; *Muniz v Church of Our Lady of Mt. Carmel,*238 AD2d 101, 102 [1997], *lv denied*90 NY2d 804 [1997]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1657 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1657

          To amend the Reclamation Safety of Dams Act of 1978.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 24, 2015

 Mr. Barrasso introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To amend the Reclamation Safety of Dams Act of 1978.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Dams Accountability, Maintenance, 
and Safety Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL PROJECT BENEFITS.

    The Reclamation Safety of Dams Act of 1978 (43 U.S.C. 506 et seq.) 
is amended--
            (1) in section 3, by striking ``Construction'' and 
        inserting ``Except as provided in section 5B, construction''; 
        and
            (2) by inserting after section 5A (43 U.S.C. 509) the 
        following:

``SEC. 5B. ADDITIONAL PROJECT BENEFITS.

    ``Notwithstanding section 3, if the Secretary determines that 
additional project benefits, including additional conservation storage 
capacity, are feasible and not inconsistent with the purposes of this 
Act, the Secretary is authorized to develop additional project benefits 
through the construction of new or supplementary works on a project in 
conjunction with the Secretary's activities under section 2 and subject 
to the conditions described in the feasibility study, provided that--
            ``(1) the Secretary determines that developing additional 
        project benefits through the construction of new or 
        supplementary works on a project will promote more efficient 
        management of water and water-related facilities;
            ``(2) the feasibility study pertaining to additional 
        project benefits has been authorized pursuant to section 8 of 
        the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 
        4601-18); and
            ``(3) the costs associated with developing the additional 
        project benefits are allocated to the authorized purposes of 
        the structure and repaid consistent with all provisions of 
        Federal Reclamation law (the Act of June 17, 1902, 43 U.S.C. 
        371 et seq.) and Acts supplemental to and amendatory of that 
        Act.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            MRV COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                              20415 Nordhoff Street
                          Chatsworth, California 91311

                                 March 21, 2002

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
450 5th Street, N.W.
Washington D.C. 20549

Dear Sirs.

               Re:  MRV Communications, Inc.
                    Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001
                    Filed March 21, 2002

This letter is written in accordance with your Temporary Final Rule and Final
Rule: Requirements for Arthur Andersen LLP Auditing Clients Release Nos.
33-8070, 34-45590; 35-27503; 39-2395; IA-2018; IC-25464; FR-62; File No.
S7-03-02 that became effective on March 18, 2002 (the "Andersen Release").

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 was filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2002 and included the
accountant's reports of Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") on our consolidated
financial statements. In accordance with Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of
Regulation S-X (as announced in the Andersen Release), please be advised that
Andersen has represented to us in writing the audit was subject to Andersen's
quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice, that the
engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards and that
there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on audits,
availability of national office consultation and availability of personnel at
foreign affiliates of Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

                                   Very truly yours,

                                   MRV Communications, Inc.


                                   By: /s/ Shay Gonen
                                       --------------------------------
                                       Interim Chief Financial Officer
. 

coH§BJPr~t51 8e 

USCIB: 13.2/65 

6 June 1955 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE M»1BERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Clearance for Category III COMINT (PETTIBONE). 

USCIB 13.2/62 dated 19 M~ 1955. 

1. ~ vote sheet reply all members have indicated their approval 

or the referenced request. 

24 

2. The Director, NSA has been advised informally of this decision. 

USCIB 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-26-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

USCIB: 13.2/65 

CONFJDE~'TIAL