alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
•. 

MEMORANWM FOR THE BRITISH CRYP.rOGRAPHIC LIAISON OFFICER 

SUBJECT: Release or AFSAM-7 to NATO :Nations 

Reference is made to your memorandum. Pl/593 1 dated 26 FebruarJ"' 

1954; subject as above. I would e.pprecie.te it if you would inform. 

the Secretary, Cypher Policy Board,, that USCIB has .approved in 

principle the release of the AFSAM-7 to NATO countries for national 

as well as international connnunice.tions. I shill insure that he 

is informed if and when a decision is ma.de to release e.ny of the 

machines for NATO national communications. I am sure the Cypher 

Policy Boa.rd will understand that the USCIB action does not constitute a connnitment to provide machines for national use by NATO 

nations. 

(DRAFr) 

RALPH J. CANINE 

Lieutenant General, US Arm:y' 

Director 

'f6P 9El9RB'I! CONTROL :NUMBER 54-514]3 

COPY 7 ~ OF ~ COPIES 

PAGE l OF -Z PAGES 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-21-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

TOP!!~~tJRET
- - ' . 

USCIB: 2$ .l/S . 

18 December 1953 

;GP SESRB!' 

M]MQRANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Program to Improve the Communications Security of 

NATO Countries. 

USCIB 2$.1/6 of 15 December 1953. 

1. The reference has been withdrawn from Agenda of the Board for 

the time being. 

2. Owing to a requirement for readjustment of several aspects of 

implementation of subject program, enclosure 1 to the reference no 

longer fully represents the views of the Ad Hoc Committee and may 

require considerable revision. Accordingly, it is requested that enclosure l with the reference be destroyed. A replacement for it will 

be issued as soon as practicable. The remaining enclosures with the 

reference should be retained in file for future reference when this - matter is restored to the Agenda. Meanwhile, such replacements for or 

additions to the other enclosures as may be necessary will be assembled. 

and distributed in due course. 

USCIB: 29.1/S 

ain, U. S. Navy 

tive Secretary, USCIB 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-21-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

'!'OP SEC!tE T 

J 

20
#### Hauenstein, Executrix, Respondent, vs. Badger Public Service Company, Appellant, and Brickbauer, Interpleaded defendant.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Sheboy-gan county dated January 21, 1927: Michael Kirwan, Judge.

Action on account. Counterclaim for damages. Judgment in favor of plaintiff, from which the *Badger Public Service Company*appeals.

For the appellant: *Shaw, Muskat & Sullivan*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent *Hauenstein: H. J. Rooney*of Plymouth.

For the interpleaded defendant: *Collins & Collins*of Sheboygan.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
# CE2004078EN.01090601.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/906 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/906

---

(2004/C 78 E/0957)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-4052/03

by Christos Folias (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(12 January 2004)

Subject:   Support for the various Churches

Subject:

As part of the policy to protect the cultural heritage and the specific cultural characteristics of Member States, will the Commission say whether it provides concrete funding, through cultural or other programmes, for the restoration of places of worship, the conservation of icons and other church treasures and the development of religious monuments?

If so, does it have at its disposal a qualitative and quantitative survey of the measures which have received funding, broken down by action and country?

Answer given by Mrs Reding on behalf of the Commission

(12 February 2004)

(12 February 2004)

The Commission does not administer any funding intended solely for the restoration or conservation of churches or church treasures.

The Commission would also like to draw the Honourable Member's attention to the fact that one of the objectives of the Culture 2000 programme is to encourage measures which enhance, at European level, the common cultural heritage of European significance, disseminate know-how and promote good practice concerning its conservation and safeguarding.

This programme supports projects which are jointly run and financed by at least three operators from a minimum of three countries participating in the programme.

The Honourable Member may wish to consult the website below for further information and a detailed list of all projects supported by the Culture 2000 programme in 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 (as well as the bodies in receipt of funding, the partners involved and the amounts awarded) (http://europa.eu.int/comm/culture/eac/indexen.html).

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

# Cryptologic Machines Image Gallery

HomeHistoryNational Cryptologic MuseumExhibits & ArtifactsCryptologic MuseumMachines

Search

Search

                              - All Images 
                              - Design Elements 
                              - NSA Historical Photographs 
                              - Other 

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (0.77 MB)

Tags:machines

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
EX-10(a)






EXHIBIT 10(a)




Schedule of Certain Executive Officers who are Parties

to the Severance Agreements in the Forms Filed as

Exhibit 10(b) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K

Dated February 21, 2007




Form A of Severance Pay Agreement




Christopher M. Connor

John G. Morikis

Sean P. Hennessy




Form B of Severance Pay Agreement




John L. Ault

George E. Heath

Thomas E. Hopkins

Timothy A. Knight

Steven J. Oberfeld

Thomas W. Seitz

Louis E. Stellato

Robert J. Wells
Exhibit (32)(2)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
C-COR Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 24, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William T. Hanelly, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                           
|/s/    WILLIAM T.
HANELLY                                  
|William T. Hanelly Chief Financial Officer November 3, 2004
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

AERIAL CROP PROTECTION, INC. 

FAA Docket No. F AA-2012-1262 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT 

RECEI\/ED 

MAR 1 3 2313 

HEARING DOCKET 

Pursuant to a settlement reached by the parties and to the provisions of 14 C.F .R. 

§13.215, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), by counsel, hereby withdraws its 

Complaint dated December 10,2012. 

Submitted this 171f day ofMarch, 2013. 

/:hAd~*:r____. A~A.,...1~'fc'kLLEHA ER 

Senior Attorney 

Office of the Regional Counsel 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certifY that I have this day served a copy of the foregoing Withdrawal of Complaint In 

the Matter of Aerial Crop Protection, Inc., FAA Docket No. FAA-2012-1262, was served via 

facsimile and regular mail to: 

Preston J. Fields, Sr., Esq. 

Preston J. Fields, P .A. 

11211 Prosperity Farms Rd. 

Suite C-301 

Palm Beach, FL 33410 

FAX: (561) 799-0388 

The Honorable J. E. Sullivan 

DOT, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

and the original a one copy to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Hearing Docket, AGC-430 

ATTN: Stephanie McClain 

800 Independence Ave., SW 

Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2Wl 000 

Washington, DC 20591 

FAX: (202) 493-5020 

~A~ Program Analyst 

MAR 7 2013 

Date 

2
USGIB: 13.5/67 

'fOF SE6ftE'f - li'.S. Eff:3 ONfJY 

MEMlRANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

i10FffiittlEB :BOOl:H fEIN'f OON'filliS 

GOBEWORB MAY?BRil~, 

24 May 1954 

Subject: Possible Compromises of COMINT Information. 

1. Attached for your information is a chart listing, by activity, eight cases evaluated as compromises of COMINT information due to ineffective COMSEC practices. 

2. It should be noted that a total of 38 cases evaluated 

as compromises have occurred during the period 1 May 1953 - 23 January 1954, 19 of which were due to transmission in P/L 

and 19 due to faulty encryption, equipment failure, etc. 

3. This matter has been brought to the attention of the 

responsible authorities and it is considered that the action 

taken, and contemplated, by the Director, NSA, will bring about 

an a.melioration of this situation. Members a.re reminded, however, 

that the backlog of cases occurring prior to 1 May 1954 and still 

under evaluation may be expected to produce a few more compromises 

be£ore the £ull effect of USCJB Directive No. 9 will become 

noticeable. 

Enclosure - a/s 

USCIB: 1).5/67 

APP!N:BBiB BOOtlMSNf OONfAINS 

00Bl!iWORB MM.'ElRikL 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-07-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

TOPSECltBP 

\ 

24 
e 

DATE OF 

ACTIVITY CCVPROOSE 

6910lih SG, 3 Sep 53 

Landsberg, Ger. 

Det. 3, 3rd RSM, 23 Sep 53 

Naknek, Alaska 

502nd CRG, Heil- 12 Dec 53 

bronn, Ger. 

NSA CODlll. Center, 16 Dec 53 

AHS, Virginia 

.3rd RSJrl, Elmendorf 19 Dec 53 

AFB, Alaska 

NSA Message Center, 23 Dec 53 

AHS,, Virginia 

NSA Conan Center,, 

AHS, Virginia 

5 Jan 54 

POSSIBLE OCJIPROMISES OF CQUNT INFORMATIOf! 

TYPE OF 

CQU>RCJIISE 

Transmission in 

P/L 

Jlonoalphabetic 

substitution 

Monoalphabetic 

substitution 

'l'ranamission in 

P/L 

Monoalphabetie) 

substitution 

TYPE dP° CIRCUIT 

~INVOLVED I 

Landline teletJPe circuit 

to ASAE, Frankfurt, Ger. 

Radio and wire links to 

.3rd RSM, Elmendorf AFB, 

Alaska. 

Landline teletJPe circuit 

to SSO, 7th Army, 

stuttgart., Ger. 

Radio circuit to Two 

Rock Ranch/Station, 

Petaluma,/ Calif. 

Unidentified circuits 

to.several RSA field 

activities. 

I 

ASAPA01 Tokyo,, 

Japan 

23 Jan 54 Tranamission•dn Landline circuits leased 

Jrllclosure w/USCIB 13.5/67' 

P/L from Japan, to 8612th 

AAUi: Cld.:tose, Japan 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

NATURE OF 

MATERIAL CCJ&PROOSED 

Unidentified. (CONFIDENTIAL 

and TCP smB.Er CW)
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Petty, AtLe e and Senior Judge Clements

JAMES STONE MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 1048-15-4 PER CURIAM OCTOBER 20, 2015 SKYLINE AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND ACCIDENT FUND NAT IONAL INSURANCE COMPANY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (David B. Vermont; As hcraft & Gerel, LLP, on brief), for appellant. (Brandi R. Howell; Franklin & Prokopik, P.C., on brief), for appellees.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication. James Stone appeals a decision of the Wo rkers’ Compensation Co mmission finding that (a) his claim was not timely and thus barred by the statute of limitations, and (b) his neck condition was not related to the original comp ensable accident because the medical records showed he complained of neck pain, the treating orthopedist testified the neck injury was masked by the shoulder injuries, and the trea ting neck specialist opined the neck injury was related to the original claim. We have revi ewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accord ingly, we affirm for the reason s stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Stone v. Skyline Auto., Inc., VWC File No. VA00000262486 (June 2, 2015). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be fore the Court and argum ent would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.UNPUBLISHED
99-1233.

#### Buckeye State Mut. Ins. Co. v. Rowland.

Jackson App. No. 98CA842. On motion for stay of trial and appellate court order for psychological examination. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas and Cook, JJ., dissent.
J

- A09029

- 20 2020 PA Super 128

___________________ * Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellee

v.

WAYNE RICHARD GLENN ,

Appellant :
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 1595 W DA 2019

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered October 4, 2019

in the Court of Common Pleas of Mercer County C riminal Division at No(s): CP

- 43

- CR

- 0000158

- 2019

BEFORE: SHOGAN , J., MURRAY, J . and STRASSBURGER, J. *

CONCURRING OPINION BY STRASSBURGER, J.: FILED MAY 29, 2020

Were this Court to reach the various canons of statutory construction,

I would agree with the Majority’s analysis. However, I would not reach

those canons because I find t hat the statutory language is not ambiguous.

See A.S. v. Pennsylvania State Police , 143 A.3d 896, 903 (Pa. 2016) (“It

is only when statutory text is determined to be ambiguous that we may go

beyond the text and look to other considerations to discern legislative

intent.”).

Briefly, s ubsection 3802(d) provides as follows.

(d) Controlled substances.

-- An individual may not drive, operate or be in actual physical control of the movement of a vehicle under any of the following circumstances:

(1) There is in the individual's blood any amount of a:

(i) Schedule I controlled substance, as defined in the act of April 14, 1972 (P.L. 233, No. 64), 1 known as The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act;J

- A 09029

- 20

- 2

- (ii) Schedule II or Schedule III controlled substance, as defined in The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, which has not been medic ally prescribed for the individual; or

(iii) metabolite of a substance under subparagraph (i) or (ii).

75 Pa .C.S. § 3802(d) (emphasis added).

Unlike subparagraphs (i) and (ii), subparagraph (iii) does not reference

Schedule I, II, or III substances wh en proscribing the existence of

metabolites in an individual’s blood . Rather, subparagraph (iii) specifically

references subparagraphs (i) and (ii), the latter of which includes an

exception for medically prescribed Schedule II and III substances

.
Theref ore, the plain language of the statute provides for the exception set

forth in subparagraph (ii) to carry through to subparagraph (iii) , thereby

excepting metabolites of medically prescribed Schedule II and III

substances

. Thus, I agree with the Majorit y that Appellant’s conviction for DUI

metabolite was unlawful because the metabolite existed in his blood only as

a result of a medically prescribed Schedule II substance , which I conclude is

not illegal pursuant to the plain language of 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802( d)

.
Summary of Teleconference with the Clean Energy Group

Regarding the Proposed Stationary Existing RICE NESHAP

November 2, 2009

Attendees

Peter Tsirigotis, EPA Cathy Waxman, National Grid

Bob Wayland, EPA Paul Lynch, National Grid

Melanie King, EPA Victoria Simon, NYPA

Bill Maxwell, EPA Dan Cunningham, PSEG

Michael Horowitz, EPA Erin Gorman, PSEG

Bruce Alexander, Exelon Zach Nuepo, Sempra/Southern California Gas

Cliff Gibson, Exelon Carrie Jenks, M.J. Bradley & Associates

Bill McFarland, Exelon Steve Piper, M.J. Bradley & Associates

John Quinn, Constellation Kathleen Robertson, M.J. Bradley & Associates

Bill Slade, ConEd

Purpose of Meeting

The purpose of this teleconference was to discuss the proposed national emission 

standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for existing stationary reciprocating internal 

combustion engines (RICE). The proposed NESHAP for existing stationary RICE was 

published in the Federal Register on March 5, 2009 (74 FR 9698). 

Summary of Meeting

The Clean Energy Group (CEG) requested this teleconference with EPA to discuss their 

comments on the proposed NESHAP. These comments can be found in the rulemaking docket 

as document number EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-0088. During the teleconference, the CEG 

reiterated the major issues presented in their comments, including: requirements for emergency 

engines at nuclear facilities, requirements for black start diesel engines, demand response 

engines, and startup/shutdown/malfunction requirements. The CEG members stated that black 

start diesel engines are mainly older engines with an average of 450 HP, and that they are not 

intended to operate for extended periods of time and do not have sufficient cooling for extended 

operation. The CEG group members agreed to provide EPA with operating data for their 

emergency and black start engines.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,579
<SECURITIES>                                     1,701
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,138
<ALLOWANCES>                                        40
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   531
<PP&E>                                           4,022
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,299
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,185
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            57
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,419
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,679
<SALES>                                         11,023
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,023
<CGS>                                              800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,758
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (62)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (43)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    570
<INCOME-TAX>                                       348
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                222
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       222
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit      32.2**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                 November                17, 2008 | By:    | /s/                Joe Noto                                   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                        |   | Joe                NotoChief                Financial Officer |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CMC
SECURITIES CORPORATION IV'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 609,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               22
<BONDS>                                        608,858
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         329
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   609,210
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,193
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    25
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              55,281
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (113)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (113)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (113)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>