alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131523 & (12) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131523 

 COA: 269434 

Clinton CC: 84-004055-FC 

KENNETH M. WOJNICZ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 17, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). The motion to remand is 

DENIED. 

s1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
SCWC-16-0000345

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

STATE OF HAWAI I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. MAXWELL F. JONES, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-16-0000345; CASE NO. 1DTA-15-03477) ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Maxwell F. Jones’s application for writ of certiorari filed on September 13, 2019, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling

.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, November 6, 2019. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-16-0000345 06-NOV-2019 01:52 PM
CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                      OF
                  PAINEWEBBER/GEODYNE INSTITUTIONAL/PENSION
                    ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PARTNERSHIP P-8

       The undersigned  General Partner hereby duly executes this Certificate of
Limited Partnership of PaineWebber/Geodyne  Institutional/Pension  Energy Income
Limited  Partnership  P-8 (the  "Partnership")  which is  being  filed  with the
Secretary of State of Oklahoma in accordance  with the Oklahoma  Revised Uniform
Limited Partnership Act.

       1.    The   name   of   the    Partnership    is    PaineWebber/Geodyne
Institutional/Pension Energy Income Limited Partnership P-8.

       2. The address of the registered  office of the  Partnership is 320 South
Boston  Ave.,  The  Mezzanine,  Tulsa,  Oklahoma  74103,  and  the  name  of the
registered  agent  whose  business  office  address  will  be  the  same  as the
registered office address is Geodyne Properties, Inc.

       3.    The address of the  principal  office of the  Partnership  in the
United States where its  Partnership  records are to be kept or made available
is c/o Geodyne Properties,  Inc., 320 South Boston Ave., The Mezzanine, Tulsa,
Oklahoma 74103-3708.

       4. The name, the mailing address,  and the street address of the business
or residence of each general partner of the Partnership are as follows:


       Name                 Mailing Address              Business Address

Geodyne Properties,      320 South Boston Ave.         320 South Boston Ave.
   Inc.                  The Mezzanine                 The Mezzanine
                         Tulsa, Oklahoma               Tulsa, Oklahoma
                        74103-3708                     74103-3708


<PAGE>



       5.    The latest  date upon which the  Partnership  is to  dissolve  is
February 28, 2012.

       SIGNED on this 28th day of February, 1992.

                                           GENERAL PARTNER:

                                           Geodyne Properties, Inc.
                                           a Delaware corporation



                                           By:  /s/ Michael E. Luttrell
                                                ---------------------------
                                                 Michael E. Luttrell
                                                 Executive Vice President
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Unified Western Grocers, Inc. (the Company) for the
fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alfred A. Plamann, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Report.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 11, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    ALFRED A. PLAMANN                                                             
|                   |  |  |  | Alfred A. Plamann President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
     I, A.L. Giannopoulos, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MICROS Systems,Inc. (the “Registrant”);
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
     4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15(e)) [*clause omitted pursuant to SECRelease Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986*] for the Registrant and we have:
          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
          b) [*paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986*];
          c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
          d) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
     5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        /s/ A.L. Giannopoulos   A.L. Giannopoulos   Chairman, President and   Chief Executive Officer     Date: May 13, 2004
USCIB: 5.3/97 

20 June 1955 

CON!'IBEM'fIAfi - l::J.B. E1IES eNfl¥ 

UNITED STATES COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITrEE 

AGENDA FOR 

Thirty-second Meeting at 1400 on Thursday, 23 June 1955, 

in Room 2E687, National Defense Building, 

Washington, D.Co 

Mr. H. Do Jones, Chairman 

Date of Initial Subject Consideration Number Subject Submitted by 

23 June 1955 5.3/ 1. Approval of Final Secretariat 

Minutes of the 29th 

Meeting. 

23 June 1955 5.4/ 2. Annual Report of the Exec. Secy. 

Executive Secretary 

USCIB (USCIB 5.4/25). 

All members are requested to remain after adjournment of the meeting for 

an Executive Session. 

USCIB 

USCIB: 5.3/97 

COf\'f'IDEA'TIAL 

,.. .1 '- r 

eclassified and a roved for r lease b NSA on 9-0 -2014 ursuantto E.O. 135
December 31, 1979.

#### West Side Sanitary District v. The Land Conservation and Development Commission

(14533).

Affirmed. *West Side Sanitary Dist. v. Health Div.,*42 Or App 755, 601 P2d 858 (1979). (603 P2d 1390, *aff’d*289 Or 409, 614 P2d 1148 (1980))
# CE2004084EN.01025602.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/256 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/256

---

(2004/C 84 E/0304)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3876/03

by Francesco Fiori (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(16 December 2003)

Subject:   Exceeding of the basic cultivation areas for 2003 and application of penalties

Subject:

With regard to the problems of maize production and the exceeding of the basic cultivation area for 2003, with the consequent application of penalties, and also in the light of the communication by Agea (Italy) on the expected 18,6 % reduction in the CAP premium arising from the imposition of a ceiling on the area reserved for maize — even though Italy's maximum guaranteed area has not been exceeded — it is now essential, as a matter of urgency, to ask the Commission to rescind the (at all events exceptional) penalties.

The drought of 2003 has taken its toll in considerably higher production costs (as much as 32 % higher than previous years), especially for irrigation, as well as in a marked fall in average production, serving to confirm the significant reduction in maize producers' incomes.

The situation of maize producers is already highly vulnerable, and could become disastrous if further unplanned events (classifiable as force majeure) occur to compound the effects of the expected 18,6 % cut.

What action will the Commission take to restore equilibrium in the maize-producing areas?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(5 February 2004)

(5 February 2004)

Concerning the request, not to apply — as an exceptional derogation for 2003 — the aid reductions per hectare (ha) caused by an excess production of the separate base area for maize in Italy, it is to be noted that the aim of the measures established in Article 2, paragraph 4 of Council Regulation (EC) 1251/1999 of 17 May 1999 establishing a support system for producers of certain arable crops (1), is to ensure market balance.

1

The global sum of the payments distributed to farmers under the arable crop scheme is not reduced if the area payment per ha is decreased due to an excess in the separate base area for maize in Italy but the eligible area per farmer is reduced proportionately for all the payments granted.

Finally, regarding a possible action of the Commission in order to redress the balance of the situation of the maize areas, Member States determine the regional base areas (Article 2, § 2 of Council Regulation (EC) 1251/1999) and have the possibility of modifying their regionalisation plan.

Concerning the bad weather conditions of the summer of 2003, which penalised farmers in Italy, it is to be noted that the Commission urgently adopted a package of measures, in order to help farmers to overcome the exceptional drought.

Due to these considerations, a derogation to the above-mentioned Regulation, because of exceptional events like this summer's drought, is not appropriate.

---

(1)  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of SupremeIndustries, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’sknowledge, that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended June 27, 2009 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Companyfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for,the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

 
| DATE: August 11, 2009 |   |                    | /s/ Herbert M. Gardner |
|----------------------------|--------|-------------------------|------------------------|
|                       |   | Herbert M. Gardner      |
|                       |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

The foregoing certification is beingfurnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) ofRegulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Qfor purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any generalincorporation language in such filing.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<MULTIPLIER>               1,000
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                 DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                               629
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     11,391
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         400
<INVENTORY>                                                       14,846
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  29,257
<PP&E>                                                            22,062
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     6,685
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    94,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             10,926
<BONDS>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                              73
<OTHER-SE>                                                        79,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      94,056
<SALES>                                                           65,664
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  65,664
<CGS>                                                             25,926
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     25,926
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 2,205
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     (294)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         823
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               (1,167)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      (1,167)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       (.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0
        

</TABLE>
POPPY Satellite Reconnaissance Program 

Recognized

| 12 September 2005 | 

CHANTILLY, Va. - The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), National Security Agency 

(NSA) and Naval Research Laboratory announce the declassification of the Cold War POPPY 

electronic intelligence (ELINT) reconnaissance program. NRO Deputy Director Dennis 

Fitzgerald hosted a private recognition ceremony today at NRO headquarters for the key 

contributors and program participants who were responsible for the success of the program. In 

the future, NSA will unveil a POPPY model for permanent display in their National Cryptologic 

Museum in Fort Meade, Maryland.

POPPY was the successor to the nation's first ELINT satellite, known as "GRAB" (Galactic 

Radiation and Background). Originally developed by the Naval Research Lab, POPPY became a 

multi-agency system when the NRO was established in 1962, shortly before the satellite's first 

launch. The POPPY system was designed to detect land based radar emitters and support ocean 

surveillance. In its seven launches spanning from 1962 to 1971, POPPY made tremendous 

contributions to the nation's security during an especially perilous era.

For additional information on the POPPY program see the POPPY Program Fact Sheet or 

contact the NRO Office of Corporate Communications at (703) 808-1746. 

POPPY Photos:
USCIB: 5.3/4B 

REF ID:A57~5 

• 

2B July 1954 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE JufEMm:tS OF USCIBEC:: 

Subject: Agenda for Seventeenth USCIBEC. 

Reference: USCIB 9.3/7 dated 27 July 1954. 

1. Owing to the short time available for study and analysis before 

24 

the meeting it has been requested that discussion of the reference be held 

in abeyance for the time being. 

2 •. Accordingly item 5 should be deleted frcm subject agenda. 

USCIB 

USCIB: 5a3/4B 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-17-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1592 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1592

 To clarify the description of certain Federal land under the Northern 
Arizona Land Exchange and Verde River Basin Partnership Act of 2005 to 
         include additional land in the Kaibab National Forest.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 17, 2015

 Mr. Flake (for himself and Mr. McCain) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify the description of certain Federal land under the Northern 
Arizona Land Exchange and Verde River Basin Partnership Act of 2005 to 
         include additional land in the Kaibab National Forest.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION RELATING TO A CERTAIN LAND DESCRIPTION UNDER 
              THE NORTHERN ARIZONA LAND EXCHANGE AND VERDE RIVER BASIN 
              PARTNERSHIP ACT OF 2005.

    Section 104(a)(5) of the Northern Arizona Land Exchange and Verde 
River Basin Partnership Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-110; 119 Stat. 
2356) is amended by inserting before the period at the end ``, which, 
notwithstanding section 102(a)(4)(B), includes the N\1/2\, NE\1/4\, 
SW\1/4\, SW\1/4\, the N\1/2\, N\1/2\, SE\1/4\, SW\1/4\, and the N\1/2\, 
N\1/2\, SW\1/4\, SE\1/4\, sec. 34, T. 22 N., R. 2 E., Gila and Salt 
River Meridian, Coconino County, comprising approximately 25 acres''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION OF ROBERT J CHAMBERLAIN PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Onyx Software Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Robert J. Chamberlain ,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 14, 2006                      /s/ ROBERT J. CHAMBERLAIN
                                          -------------------------
                                          Robert J. Chamberlain
                                          Chief Financial Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7604** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. MICHAEL SCOTT MCRAE , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Malcolm J. Howard , Senior District Judge. ( 5:97

- cr - 00094

- H

- 6 )

Submitted : April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Michael Scott Mc R ae , Appellant Pro Se
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Scott McRae appeals the district court ’ s order denying various motions challenging his criminal conviction . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant McRae’s motion to file an addendum and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. McRae , No. 5:97

- cr - 00094

- H

- 6 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 2011)
. We dispense with o ral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED