Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility 

Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 

Latitude: 21o

22’15” N 

Longitude: 157o

53’33” W 

DOH Facility ID No. 9-102271 

DOH Release ID No. 99051, 010011, 020028 

September 2008 

Prepared by: 

TEC Inc. 

1001 Bishop St. Suite 1400 

American Savings Bank Tower 

Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 

Prepared for: 

Commander 

Navy Region Hawaii 

Environmental Department, Code N45 

850 Ticonderoga Street, Suite 110 

Pearl Harbor, Hawaii 96860-5101 

 

Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008 

i 

Table of Contents 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. ES-1

SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1-1

1.1 PROJECT OBJECTIVE ............................................................................................................... 1-1

1.2 PREVIOUS REPORTS ................................................................................................................ 1-1

1.3 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................ 1-1

1.3.1 Site Description ......................................................................................................... 1-1

1.3.2 Facility Information .................................................................................................. 1-2

1.3.3 UST Information ........................................................................................................ 1-2

1.4 DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM ..................................................................................................... 1-2

1.5 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS AT THE FACILITY .......................................... 1-3

SECTION 2 REMOVAL ACTION ACTIVITIES ............................................................................... 2-1

2.1 JUNE 10, 2008 ACTIVITIES ...................................................................................................... 2-1

2.2 JUNE 17, 2008 ACTIVITIES ...................................................................................................... 2-2

2.3 SAMPLE COLLECTION ............................................................................................................. 2-2

2.4 SOIL SAMPLE ANALYSES ........................................................................................................ 2-2

SECTION 3 SOIL SAMPLE RESULTS ............................................................................................... 3-1

3.1 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS ............................................................................................. 3-1

SECTION 4 ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD EVALUATION ........................................................... 4-1

SECTION 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................... 5-1

SECTION 6 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................... 6-1

List of Tables 

Table 3-1. Results for Composite Samples Compared to Environmental Action Levels ........... 3-2

List of Figures 

Figure 1-1. Regional Location Map ............................................................................................ 1-7

Figure 1-2. Area Wells and Aquifer Systems ............................................................................. 1-8

Figure 1-3. Fuel Storage Tanks and Water Tunnel Cross-Section ............................................. 1-9

Figure 1-4. Tank 17 Site Layout Map ....................................................................................... 1-10

Figure 2-1. Composite Sample Locations ................................................................................... 2-3

List of Appendices 

Appendix A – Photo Documentation 

Appendix B – Laboratory Analytical Reports 
Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008 

ii 

List of Acronyms and Abbreviations 

μg/m3 micrograms per cubic meter

μg/kg micrograms per kilogram 

AFCEE Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environment 

bgs below ground surface 

BTEX benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes 

DOH State of Hawaii Department of Health 

EALs Environmental Action Levels 

EHE Environmental Hazard Evaluation 

F-76 diesel marine fuel 

FISC Fleet Industrial Supply Center 

HAR Hawaii Administrative Rules 

HRS Hawaii Revised Statutes 

JP-5 Jet Propulsion fuel 5 

MDL method detection limit 

mgd million gallons per day 

mg/kg milligrams per kilogram 

mg/L milligrams per Liter 

mm millimeter 

MtBE methyl tert-butyl Ether 

PAHs polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons 

PHWS Pearl Harbor Water System 

PID photo-ionization detector 

ppmv parts per million by volume 

RL reporting limit 

SIM Selected Ion Monitoring 

SVMP soil vapor monitoring point 

TEC TEC Inc 

TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon 

TPH-GRO Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons -Gasoline Range Organics 

TPH-DRO Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons -Diesel Range Organics 

USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency 

U.S. Navy United States Navy 

UST underground storage tank 

VOCs volatile organic compounds 
Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008 

ES-1 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

This Removal Action report is presented by the U.S. Navy to document activities conducted to 

mitigate an inadvertent release of fuel from overhead piping located in the lower access tunnel of 

the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility. 

There are 18 active and 2 inactive, 12.5 million-gallon field-constructed underground storage 

tanks (USTs) located at the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility (the Facility). The active USTs 

contain middle distillate petroleum fuels: Jet Propulsion fuel 5 (JP-5), JP-8 and F-76 (diesel 

marine fuel). The top of the USTs are located at least 100 feet below ground surface (bgs) and 

the bottoms are located at least 80 feet above the groundwater table. The aquifer underlying the 

Facility is categorized as a currently used, fresh (chloride content below 250 milligrams per Liter 

[mg/L]) drinking water source that is irreplaceable and has a high vulnerability to contamination 

(Mink and Lau, 1990). The nearest production well is the United States Navy (U.S. Navy) Well 

2254-01, located approximately 3,000 feet down-gradient from the Facility. The U.S Navy Well 

2254-01 produces between 4 million gallons per day (mgd) and 10 mgd of potable water for the 

U.S. Navy’s Pearl Harbor Water System (PHWS). 

Previous environmental site investigations indicated fuel releases have occurred that have 

impacted groundwater underlying the Facility. A risk assessment conducted by the U.S. Navy 

(TEC Inc., 2007) concluded that the USTs were below the bottom of the adjacent valleys, and 

past or future releases will not present a risk to above ground receptors, either due to direct 

exposure or soil vapor intrusion. In addition, the risk assessment used a three-dimensional 

groundwater model to estimate the minimum size of a release that would degrade the water 

produced by the U.S. Navy Well 2254-01. Assuming natural degradation of the middle distillate 

fuel, it was estimated that a minimum release of 16,000 gallons would be required to impact the 

U.S. Navy Well 2254-01. 

 

On March 4, 2008, approximately four gallons of JP-5 fuel was released from overhead piping in 

the Facility lower access tunnel adjacent to Tank 17. The release landed on a pile of excavated 

soil covered with plastic sheeting, and migrated into an adjacent trench covered with plywood. 

Approximately two gallons were immediately removed from the ground surface using absorbent 

material leaving an estimated two gallons to seep into the bedrock in the plywood-covered trench. 

In June, TEC Inc. (TEC) was contracted to conduct a limited removal action and site 

characterization investigation as part of the release response activity required by the Hawaii 

Revised Statutes (HRS), Title 19, Chapter 342L and Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR), Title 

11, Chapter 281, Subchapters 1 through 10. The open trench was manually excavated to 

approximately five feet below the tunnel floor through the consolidated basalt bedrock, until 

observed pore-space fluid and staining was diminished. Excavation was halted because further 

digging will require engineering controls to stabilize the adjacent tunnel-wall bulkheads and 

additional removal of the concrete tunnel floor. Although petroleum-impacted rock remains in 

the trench walls and floor, all potentially mobile fuel was removed. Maximum headspace 

measurements from a field photoionization detector (PID) at the extent of the excavation was 

225 parts per million by volume (ppmv). Laboratory results from a composite sample of 

material collected at the extent of the excavation showed Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) 
Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008 

ES-2 

as Gasoline Range Organics (TPH-GRO) at 110 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) and TPH as 

Diesel Range Organics (TPH-DRO) at 5,670 mg/kg, as well as detected concentrations of 

naphthalene, ethylbenzene and xylenes. Benzene was not detected. 

An Environmental Hazard Evaluation (EHE) was conducted to assess the hazards associated 

with the petroleum-impacted material that remains in place. The risk drivers were evaluated as 

TPH-DRO and TPH-GRO. The State of Hawaii Department of Health (DOH) Environmental 

Action Levels (EALs) (DOH 2005 and 2006 updates) for soil contamination were used to screen 

the EHE: 

• The gross contamination (for staining and odor nuisance) EAL is 100 mg/kg. 

o The results of the final sample exceed this EAL for impacted bedrock located 

below the concrete floor of the lower access tunnel of the Facility. 

o The location of the impacted material is a secure facility. 

o Excavation in this area is not expected in the future, nor will this impacted 

material be used for backfill in the future since it is consolidated bedrock, and 

very difficult to excavate. 

o The Facility is strictly regulated for combustion sources to mitigate a potential 

flammability concern. 

o Gross contamination left in place is not considered a significant environmental 

hazard for the reasons described above. 

• EALs associated with terrestrial receptors are site-specific, depending on the type and 

availability of receptors to the chemicals of concern. 

o The pathway to terrestrial receptors is incomplete since the impacted material is 

greater than 300 feet bgs and located beneath the concrete floor of the lower 

access tunnel in a secure facility, nor will this impacted material be used for 

backfill in the future since it is consolidated bedrock, and very difficult to 

excavate. 

o Impact to terrestrial receptors is not considered a significant environmental hazard 

for the reasons described above. 

• Soil gas (for potential impact to indoor air) EAL for commercial/industrial receptors is 

140,000 μg/m3 (micrograms per cubic meter), or approximately 20 ppmv for middle 

distillate fuels; 

o The maximum headspace reading at the bottom of the trench excavation was 225 

ppmv, which exceeded the soil gas EAL by a factor of 11. 

o However, the EAL assumes commercial/industrial exposure factors including: 

 Exposure duration of 25 years; 

 Exposure frequency of 250 days per year. 

o Actual exposure to the limited release at Tank 17 is expected to be much less: 

 Exposure duration of 10 years; 

 Exposure frequency of 1 day per year; 

 Actual estimated exposure is probably 600 times less than the 

commercial/industrial exposure factors, thus the site specific action level 

is 12,500 ppmv, or 55 times more than the concentrations observed. 

o The Facility has a ventilation system designed to completely replenish the indoor 

air with ambient outdoor air from ground surface on the Red Hill ridgeline to 
Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008 

ES-3 

ensure safe indoor air quality during activities associated with open UST 

manways, and other potential exposure events. 

o Soil gas intrusion to indoor air from the impacted material remaining in place is 

not considered a significant environmental hazard for the reasons described above. 

• Soil leaching (potential for contaminants in soil to migrate in infiltrating groundwater to 

the groundwater table) EAL for TPH-DRO is 5,000 mg/kg and for TPH-GRO is 2,000 

mg/kg. 

o The composite sample results from the excavation extents exceeded the EAL for 

TPH-DRO (5,670 mg/kg) and was less than the EAL for TPH-GRO (110 mg/kg). 

o The risk assessment associated with the 2007 site investigation report (TEC, 2007) 

indicated that leachate was not a significant driver for impacting the down 

gradient U.S. Navy Well 2254-01. A significant liquid fuel on groundwater was 

necessary to impact the drinking water quality in this well. 

o The location of the remaining impacted soil is under the concrete floor of the 

Facility, and will not encounter significant infiltrating groundwater. 

o Leaching of contaminants from impacted material left in place to infiltrating 

groundwater is not considered a significant environmental hazard for the reasons 

described above. 

It is recommended that the trench excavation be back-filled using the following procedure. 

1. Place low-permeable clay material to approximately one foot below the floor surface. 

This will greatly reduce the migration pathway of water through the impacted material, 

and will likewise reduce the soil vapor migration pathway to floor surface. 

2. Place compaction gravel from the surface of the low-permeable clay to 6 inches from the 

ground surface. This material should be compacted to limit settling of the fill material 

over time that could destabilize the concrete floor of the tunnel. 

3. Finish installing the soil vapor monitoring point (SVMP) surface completions for the 

newly installed SVMPs. 

4. Complete the upper six inches with hardened concrete, finished to floor surface. 

 
Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008 

ES-4 

This page is intentionally left blank. 
Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008 

1-1 

Section 1

INTRODUCTION 

This Removal Action Report is prepared by TEC Inc. (TEC) for the Air Force Center for 

Engineering and the Environment (AFCEE) in support of the United States Navy (U.S. Navy), 

Fleet Industrial Supply Center (FISC), Pearl Harbor, Hawaii under contract F41624-03-D-8618-

0021. 

1.1 PROJECT OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this report are to: 

1. Describe the activities associated with the inadvertent release of approximately four 

gallons of Jet Propulsion fuel 5 (JP-5) on March 4, 2008 in the lower access tunnel of the 

Facility, adjacent to Tank 17; 

2. Describe the removal action and site characterization activities that were performed in 

June 2008 to mitigate the release to the subsurface; 

3. Present the results of the release response removal action and confirmation sampling 

event; 

4. Provide an Environmental Hazard Evaluation (EHE) to assess the hazards associated with 

the petroleum contaminated rock that remains in place in accordance with Long-Term 

Management of Petroleum-Contaminated Soil and Groundwater, June 2007. 

1.2 PREVIOUS REPORTS

The following environmental reports previously submitted to the State of Hawaii Department of 

Health (DOH) are pertinent to this removal action report: 

1. TEC Inc. 2007. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Final Technical Report, Pearl 

Harbor, Hawaii. August. 

2. TEC Inc. 2008. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Final Groundwater Protection 

Plan, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. January. 

1.3 BACKGROUND

1.3.1 Site Description 

 The Facility is located northeast of Pearl Harbor, between Halawa Valley and Moanalua Valley 

on the island of Oahu, Hawaii. Figure 1-1 presents the regional location map of the Facility. 

The Facility is located on the boundary between the Moanalua Aquifer system, which is part of 

the Honolulu Aquifer sector, and the Waimalu Aquifer system, which is part of the Pearl Harbor 

Aquifer sector. Both the Moanalua Aquifer and Waimalu Aquifer systems are classified by 

Mink and Lau as unconfined, basal and flank. Their status is listed as a currently used, fresh 

(chloride content below 250 milligrams per Liter [mg/L]) drinking water source that is 

irreplaceable and has a high vulnerability to contamination (Mink and Lau, 1990). Figure 1-2 

illustrates the Facility with respect to area wells and aquifers. 

The Navy Public Works Department operates a potable water infiltration tunnel approximately 

1,550 feet hydraulically downgradient from the Facility (Dawson, 2006). The U.S. Navy Well 

2254-01 is located approximately 3,000 feet downgradient (west) of the Facility and provides 
Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008 

1-2 

approximately 24% of the potable water to the Pearl Harbor Water System, which serves 

approximately 52,200 military consumers (TEC, 2008). Figure 1-3 illustrates the location of the 

Facility with respect to the U.S. Navy Well 2254-01 and its infiltration gallery. 

According to the Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH) Criteria Working Group Series, Volume 2 

(TCWG, 1998), JP-5 contains approximately 6.8% aromatic hydrocarbons, less than 1% benzene, 

toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX), and less than 0.02% benzene; and diesel-based fuels 

contain even less aromatic hydrocarbons. In addition, diesels and JP fuels do not contain lead or 

methyl tert-butyl Ether (MtBE). An important mechanism is the solubility limit of a fuel at 

standard temperature and pressure, which is the highest concentration of petroleum hydrocarbons 

one can expect to dissolve in water. The solubility limit for JP-5 is approximately 4.5 mg/L. 

The solubility limit for benzene in JP-5 is 0.75 mg/L. These concentrations will only be reached 

if these fuels are in direct contact and at equilibrium with the groundwater table. The lower 

dissolved concentration resulting from JP-5 allows the fuel to be degraded by natural attenuation 

mechanisms, such as by the metabolism of natural microbes in the groundwater. 

1.3.2 Facility Information 

The Facility consists of 18 active and 2 inactive underground storage tanks (USTs) operated by 

FISC, Pearl Harbor. Each UST has a capacity of approximately 12.5 million gallons, and 

currently contain JP-5, JP-8, and F-76 (diesel marine fuel). All fuels currently contained in the 

Facility are middle distillates, thus are not highly volatile or highly mobile in groundwater. The 

Facility is located approximately 100 feet above the basal aquifer (Dawson, 2006). 

1.3.3 UST Information 

The USTs were constructed in the early 1940s. The tanks were constructed of steel and currently 

contain JP-5, JP-8 and F-76. Previously, several tanks stored Navy Special Fuel Oil, Navy 

Distillate, aviation gasoline, and motor gasoline. Each tank measures approximately 245 feet in 

height and 100 feet in diameter. The upper domes of the tanks lie at depths varying between 

approximately 100 feet and 200 feet below the existing ground surface (TEC, 2006) (Figure 1-3). 

1.4 DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM

On March 4, 2008, the sample line to the bottom of Tank 17 in the lower access tunnel leaked 

JP-5 fuel. The leak was associated with the repair of this sample pipeline. The sample line that 

was responsible for the leak had trapped JP-5 that was inadvertently released. Once the sample 

line was cleared, no more JP-5 fuel was released. The duration of the JP-5 release was 

approximately 20 seconds resulting in an estimated three to four gallons spilled onto an 

excavated pile of soil and rubble that had been covered with plastic sheeting. The fuel migrated 

off the sheeting, onto the concrete floor of the tunnel and into an open trench that was being 

prepared for soil vapor monitoring points (SVMPs) associated with Tank 17. The bottom of the 

trench contained both consolidated and unconsolidated bedrock. FISC site personnel (Ryan 

Gilla and Neal Horimoto) initiated immediate spill response measures that included the 

placement of absorbent pads on the floor and surrounding soil/rock to recover as much JP-5 as 

possible. The estimated quantity of JP-5 recovered by the absorbent pads was one to two gallons 

while the remainder of the fuel most likely infiltrated into the adjacent trench. Initial spill 

response actions by FISC personnel did not include removal of liquid or contaminated soil other 

than what was removed in the absorbent material. Figure 1-4 shows the Tank 17 site layout and 

features. 
Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008 

1-3 

Following the immediate measures conducted by FISC, the excavated debris pile and trench 

were covered while FISC prepared contracts to address the contaminated material that remained 

following the March 4, 2008 events. 

1.5 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS AT THE FACILITY

1998 to 2001: From 1998 to 2001, the Navy conducted an investigation at the Facility to assess 

potential releases from the fuel storage USTs and piping systems. In February 2001, the Navy 

installed a one-inch diameter sentinel well RHMW01 (previously known as MW-V1D) to 

monitor for contamination of the basal aquifer underlying the Facility. The well was installed 

and completed at approximately 100 feet below grade within the underground access tunnel. At 

the time of well completion, depth to water in RHMW01 was measured at 86 feet below grade 

(Dawson, 2006). 

In February 2001, groundwater samples collected from sentinel well RHMW01 contained TPH 

concentrations ranging from 0.883 mg/L to 1.05 mg/L and total lead ranging from 0.0104 mg/L 

to 0.015 mg/L. The maximum total lead concentration in the samples was equal to the primary 

drinking water standard of 0.015 mg/L for lead and exceeded the DOH Tier 1 groundwater 

action level of 0.0056 mg/L (Dawson, 2006). 

2005 – Groundwater Sampling: The Navy began quarterly groundwater sampling at existing 

monitoring wells in 2005. Dawson Group, Inc. collected groundwater samples from RHMW01 

and the Red Hill Navy Pump Station (U.S. Navy Well 2254-01) in February, June, September, 

and December 2005. 

Samples collected in February and June 2005 were not filtered in the field prior to analysis for 

lead. Analytical results for samples collected from RHMW01 indicated concentrations of total 

lead were above the DOH Tier 1 action level of 0.0056 mg/L. The results were not considered 

appropriate for risk assessment since the sample had not been filtered. In addition, lead was not 

a component of fuels from the tanks near RHMW01. Lead may have been part of the Facility 

construction material (TEC, 2007). 

Samples were filtered in September and December 2005, and dissolved lead concentrations were 

below the DOH Tier 1 action level. Concentrations of all other contaminants of potential 

concern were below DOH Tier 1 action levels. 

2005 – Site Investigation: As part of a site investigation, TEC installed three groundwater 

monitoring wells at the Facility between June and September 2005. Well RHMW02 was 

installed in the lower access tunnel near Tanks 5 and 6. Well RHMW03 was installed in the 

lower access tunnel near Tanks 13 and 14. Well RHMW04 was installed hydraulically 

upgradient of the USTs to provide geochemistry for water moving through the basal aquifer 

beneath the Facility. Wells RHMW02 and RHMW03 were completed to depths of 

approximately 125 feet below the tunnel floor, and well RHMW04 was completed to a depth of 

approximately 300 feet below ground surface (bgs) outside the tunnel. Groundwater samples 

were collected from the three newly installed wells and two existing wells (RHMW01 and U.S. 

Navy Well 2254-01) in September 2005. 
Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008 

1-4 

Naphthalene and trichloroethylene were detected in samples collected from RHMW02 at 

concentrations greater than the DOH Tier 1 action levels. Lead was detected in the sample 

collected from RHMW01 at a concentration greater than the DOH Tier 1 action level; however, 

the sample was not filtered in the field prior to analysis. Analytical results for filtered samples 

obtained by Dawson during the same period indicated concentrations of dissolved lead were 

below the DOH Tier 1 action level. 

2006 – Site Investigation: Dedicated sampling pumps were installed in five wells (RHMW01, 

RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW04, and U.S. Navy Well 2254-01). TEC collected groundwater 

samples from the wells in July 2006. The groundwater samples were analyzed for petroleum 

constituents. Naphthalene was detected in samples collected from RHMW02 at concentrations 

above the DOH Tier 1 action level. 

In September 2005, with concurrence from the DOH, the Navy decided to use the newer DOH 

Environmental Action Levels (EALs) for the Red Hill Site Investigation and Risk Assessment 

project. The EALs are current and provide action levels for more chemicals, and are much more 

useful for conducting screening risk assessments. Since the DOH June 2005 Policy Letter stated 

that the two sets of action levels should not be mixed, the Tier 1 screening levels presented in 

HAR Section 11-281-78 would no longer be used to evaluate environmental impact at the 

Facility. 

2006 – Groundwater Sampling: Groundwater samples were collected in December 2006. 

Analytical results indicated the following: 

• No chemicals were detected in groundwater from U.S. Navy Well 2254-01 or RHMW03; 

• TPH as diesel range organics (TPH-DRO) was detected in groundwater above the DOH 

Drinking Water EALs in RHMW01; and 

• TPH as gasoline range organics (TPH-GRO), TPH-DRO, and naphthalene were detected 

in groundwater above the DOH Drinking Water EALs in RHMW02. 

2007 – Groundwater Sampling: Groundwater samples were collected in March, June, and 

September 2007. Analytical results indicated the following: 

• No chemicals were detected above DOH Drinking Water EALs at U.S. Navy Well 2254-

01; 

• TPH-DRO exceeded DOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW01 during all three sampling 

events; 

• TPH-GRO exceeded DOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW02 in March; 

• TPH-DRO and naphthalene exceeded DOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW02 during 

all three sampling events; 

• 1-methylnaphthalene and 2-methylnaphthalene exceeded DOH Drinking Water EAL for 

taste and odor at RHMW02 during all three sampling events; and 

• TPH-DRO exceeded DOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW03 in June. 

2008 – Groundwater Sampling: Groundwater samples were collected in January, April and 

July 2008. Groundwater data for the July events are not summarized here because they have not 
Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008 

1-5 

been fully validated at the date of this writing. Analytical results for January 2008 indicated the 

following: 

• No chemicals were detected above DOH Drinking Water EALs at U.S. Navy Well 2254-

01; 

• TPH-DRO exceeded DOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW0, but did not exceed the 

site-specific action level, which would require free product at this location; 

• TPH-GRO did not exceed DOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW02; 

• TPH-DRO and naphthalene exceeded DOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW02; 

• 1-methylnaphthalene and 2-methylnaphthalene exceeded DOH Drinking Water EAL for 

taste and odor at RHMW02; and 

• TPH-DRO exceeded DOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW03. 

Analytical results for April 2008 indicated the following: 

• No chemicals were detected above DOH Drinking Water EALs at U.S. Navy Well 2254-

01; 

• TPH-DRO exceeded DOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW01, but did not exceed the 

site-specific action level that would indicate free product at this location; 

• TPH-GRO did not exceed DOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW02; 

• TPH-DRO and naphthalene exceeded DOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW02 and 

concentrations measured for TPH-DRO (3,120 μg/L and 3,020 μg/L for the normal and 

duplicate sample, respectively) were close to the solubility limit estimated for JP-5 (about 

4,700 μg/L); 

• 1-methylnaphthalene and 2-methylnaphthalene exceeded DOH Drinking Water EAL for 

taste and odor at RHMW02; and 

• TPH-DRO exceeded DOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW03, but below the sitespecific action limits that would indicate free product. 

 
Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008 

1-6 

This page is intentionally left blank. 

 
(!

(!

!(

!(

(!

(!

(!

(!

!(

South Halawa Stream

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

RHMW03

RHMW02

RHMW01

RHMW0

2254-01

2354-01

2253-03

OWDFMW2

OWDFMW1

240

280

320

360

200

400

160

440

560

1

2

0

600

680

640

440

240

280

240

280

8

0

120

280

400

680

3

6

0

520

360

4

4

0

1

6

0

480

3

2

0

320

160

1

6

0

280

440

720

200

200

480

4

0

0

1

2

0

I:\Projects\Red Hill\Figures\DraftTechnical Report\Figure 1-2_SitePlan Map_4/16/2007

Stream Box Culvert

Halawa

Correctional

Facility

Halawa

Industrial

Park

US Navy

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility

H-3

Freeway

Red Hill Oily Waste

Disposal Facility

Boundary of Red Hill

Naval Reservation

U.S. Navy Pumping Stationat Red Hill

Halawa Shaft BOWS

Pump Station

Coast Guard

Reservation

North Halawa Stream

Moanalu
!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

§ ̈¦H 3

Moanalua Fwy

Halawa Shaft

(2354-01)

Halawa Stream

North Halawa Stream

Moanalua Stream

South Halawa Stream

South Halawa Stream

2255-392255-372255-38

2253-03

2253-01

2253-02

2154-01 2153-09

2155-04

2254-02

U.S. Navy Well

(2254-01)

Moanalua Monitor

(2153-05)

2153-10

2153-04

2153-11

2153-072153-08

2153-12

Printing Date: Apr. 23, 2007, Fi el : I:\Projects\Red Hill\Figures\Draft Techn ci al Report\Figure 1-8_Area Wells and Aquifer Systems.mxd

30201111

(11111)

30201116

(12212)

30104116

(11113)

30104111

(11111)

Figure 1-2Area Wells and Aquifer SystemsRed Hill Fuel Storage Facility Oahu, Hawaii
Figure 1-

3

Fuel Storage Tanks and

W

ater Tun

nel Cross Sectio

n

Printing Date: Apr. 16, 2007, I:\Projects\Red Hill\Figures\Draft Technical Report\Figure 1-4_Fuel Storage Tanks and Water Tunne l Cross Section.mxd

Re

d

H

ill Fuel Storag

e

F

a

cility

Oahu, H

a

w

aii
Pub Date: Feb 1, 2008; I:\Projects\9121_Red_Hill\figures W\ P F\ gi _A-1_work_area m. xd

I-Beam

Steel Pillar

Not to Scale

Notes

North Soil Pile

 South Soil Pile

Tank 17 

Trench

Lower Access Tunnel

Tank 18

Tank 17

Access 

Tunnel

Characterized as

clean soil from 

other tanks

Excavation Area

Relocated

Pile

(Removed as IDW)

±

PetroleumImpacted

Trench

Figure 1-4

Tank 17 Excavation Site Layout Map

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility

Oahu, Hawaii
Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008 

2-1 

Section 2

REMOVAL ACTION ACTIVITIES 

On June 10 and 17, 2008, TEC conducted removal action activities at the Tank 17 site. These 

activities included but are not limited to soil excavation, sampling and monitoring. Photodocumentation of the removal action activities are presented in Appendix A. 

2.1 JUNE 10, 2008 ACTIVITIES

On June 10, 2008, TEC personnel assessed the area and mobilized the equipment needed to 

perform a limited removal of contaminated bedrock resulting from approximately 2 gallons of 

JP-5 released to the subsurface trench. These included a pneumatic jackhammer with a two foot 

extension bit, shovels, two 55-gallon drums, health and safety equipment and sampling 

equipment. Sampling equipment included ppbPlus RAE photoionization detector (PID) field 

headspace measurements, and containers for impacted soil samples to be collected at the extents 

of the excavation. Headspace readings were taken from the excavated material pile adjacent to 

the trench at nine locations, and at two locations in the trench. The readings were highest in the 

excavation nearest the bulkhead and in the southern portion of the previously excavated pile 

(visual staining). 

The headspace readings ranged from approximately 5 parts per million by volume (ppmv) to 81 

ppmv, with background at approximately 5 ppmv. In general the readings from the north and 

south piles, excluding the hot spot, ranged from approximately 5 ppmv to greater than 25 

ppmv. The soil in the north pile was determined to be suitable to use as backfill for the Tank 17 

soil vapor sampling trench (see Figure 2-1). 

The bulkhead side of the trench (north) was excavated to approximately 1.5 feet below the initial 

starting depth (two feet below the concrete surface). PID readings by depth were as follows: 

• Surface approximately 81 ppmv; 

• 6 inches approximately 95 ppmv; 

• 1foot approximately 109 ppmv; and 

• 1.5 feet approximately 120 ppmv. 

At a depth of one foot below the original surface, petroleum (presumably JP-5) was observed to 

pool within the low points of the excavation. TEC personnel used a vacuum to remove the 

pooled fluid to the extent practical. Fluid increased with depth to a total depth of 1.5 feet below 

the original grade. The excavation was advanced by breaking fragments of the bedrock using the 

pneumatic jackhammer then removing the material with a shovel or by hand. The excavated 

material consisted of solid rock (basalt with very small vesicles less than 2 millimeters (mm) in 

diameter). During the use of the demolition hammer, strong fuel odor was coming from the 

trench and one breathing zone reading was approximately 25 ppmv. Work continued using fullfaced respirators. The trench was excavated to dimensions of approximately 2 feet long by 1.7 

inches wide by 1.5 feet deep. Excavation activities ceased once TEC personnel reached the 

depth where the demolition hammer was no longer effective. 
Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008 

2-2 

One composite sample (RHTK17-1) was collected for both trench characterization and soil/rock 

disposal from the bottom of the excavation at 1.5 feet below the original trench grade. Figure 2-1 

indicates the location of the composited grab samples. The southern soil pile and excavated 

material were put into a drum for disposal following receipt of laboratory analyses. The sample 

was analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by United States Environmental Protection 

Agency (USEPA) Method 8021; polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by USEPA method 

8270 by Selected Ion Monitoring (SIM); and TPH-DRO and TPH-GRO by USEPA Method 

8015 modified. In addition, flashpoint was analyzed for disposal purposes. The sample was 

collected in four four-ounce containers, cooled to specifications and shipped under chain-ofcustody to SGS Environmental Services, Alaska. 

Investigative-derived waste from June 10, 2008 events included one 55-galllon drum of material 

excavated from the trench, and an additional 20 gallons of material from the stained soil 

stockpile. 

2.2 JUNE 17, 2008 ACTIVITIES

On June 17, 2008, TEC returned to the Tank 17 excavation site with a 4-foot extension to the 

pneumatic jack-hammer and advanced the excavation to approximately 4 feet below the original 

trench grade (4.5 feet bgs). PID readings by depth were as follows: 

• 3 feet below tunnel surface, 83.9 ppmv; and 

• 4.5 feet below tunnel floor surface, 225 ppmv. 

Saturated bedrock was removed to about 4.5 feet below grade at which point a weathered low 

permeability saprolitic material was encountered. Saprolite is weathered basalt that has the grain 

size of silty clay but maintains some of the texture of the original basalt. Although headspace 

measurements remained elevated, pooled material was no longer evident. Excavation ceased 

because of the potential for destabilizing the bulkhead and tunnel walls without proper 

engineering controls. In total, approximately 11 cubic feet of bedrock was removed from 

beneath the Tank 17 trench. An additional composite sample (RHTK17-3) was collected from 

locations within the excavation shown in Figure 2-1 (similar to RHTK17-1, except deeper), 

containerized and shipped in a similar fashion to SGS Environmental Services, Alaska. 

2.3 SAMPLE COLLECTION

Samples were collected from four locations within the trench illustrated in Figure 2-1 and 

composited into sample containers. Aliquots to be analyzed for TPH-GRO and BTEX by 

USEPA Method 8021 were placed in a 4-ounce container with septa and covered with methanol 

for preservation. The aliquot for the remaining analyses (TPH-DRO, PAHs, and flashpoint) was 

placed in a second 4-ounce jar for preparation. Sample containers were labeled with the date, 

sample identification number, type of analysis, and sampler’s name. The containers were placed 

on ice in sample coolers and transported under chain-of-custody procedures to the certified 

laboratory for analysis. 

2.4 SOIL SAMPLE ANALYSES

Composite samples were analyzed by SGS Environmental Services, Inc. in Anchorage, Alaska 

for TPH-DRO by EPA Method 8015B, TPH-GRO and VOCs by EPA Method 8021, PAHs by 

EPA Method 8270C SIM, and flashpoint for disposal. 
P

ub

Da

te:

F

eb

1,

2

0

08;I:\

P

rojec

t

s

\91

21_Red_H

i

ll\

f

iguresW

\

PF

\

g

i_A

-1_

wo

rk_area.mxd

I-Beam

Steel Pillar

North Soil 

 South So

Tank 17 

Trench

Lower Access Tunnel

Tank 18

Tank 17

Access

Tunnel

Charac

clean sother ta

Excavation Area

(Removed as 

X

X X

X

Figure 2-1

Tank 17 Site Composite Sample Locations

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility

Oahu, Hawaii
Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008 

2-4 

This page is intentionally left blank. 
Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008 

3-1 

Section 3

SOIL SAMPLE RESULTS 

This section provides a summary of analytical results from two composite samples collected 

from the excavation trench located adjacent to Tank 17 in the lower access tunnel of the Facility 

(Figure 2-1). Sample results are summarized in Table 3-1. Complete laboratory reports are 

included in Appendix B. 

3.1 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Both composite samples were analyzed for TPH-DRO, TPH-GRO, VOCs, PAHs, and flashpoint. 

Data qualifier “J” indicates the result is between the method detection limit (MDL) and the 

reporting limit (RL) and considered an estimated value. 

RHTK17-1 was composited from four discrete samples at about 2 feet below the tunnel ground 

surface (1.5 feet below the original trench grade). RHTK17-3 was composited from four discrete 

samples at about 4.5 feet below the tunnel ground surface (4 feet below the original trench grade). 

TPH-DRO and TPH-GRO were measured at 5,040 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) and 111 

mg/kg at 2.5 feet bgs, respectively, compared to 5,670 mg/kg and 110 mg/kg at 4.5 ft bgs. The 

EAL for leaching to groundwater for TPH-DRO (100 mg/kg) was exceeded in both samples. 

Though concentrations were similar in both samples, the lack of liquid product at the end of the 

excavation indicated that the limited remaining fuel would not be expected to migrate further. 

Leaching is expected to be insignificant since the material will be covered by the concrete floor 

of the lower access tunnel. 

Benzene was not detected in either sample above the MDL of 6.95 micrograms per kilogram 

(μg/kg). Ethylbenzene and total xylenes were detected at 5 feet bgs, and the total xylenes 

concentration (3,200 μg/kg) exceeded the DOH EAL for leaching to groundwater (2,300 μg/kg). 

The leaching pathway is expected to be insignificant. 

Nine PAHs were detected at 2 feet bgs and six were detected at 4.5 feet bgs. Naphthalene (3.3 

mg/kg), 1-methylnaphthalene (6.85 mg/kg) and 2-methylnaphthalene (7.29 mg/kg) were detected 

above the EALs for leaching (1.9 mg/kg, 0.24 mg/kg and 0.24 mg/kg, respectively). However, 

the EAL for 1-methylanphthalene and 2-methylnaphthalene is based on toxicity to ecological 

receptors in surface water and the exposure pathway to surface water is insignificant (TEC 2007). 

The human health toxicity EAL is approximately 100 times greater. In addition, the leaching 

pathway is expected to be insignificant. The EAL for soil vapor intrusion into residential 

buildings was exceeded for 1-methylanphthalene and 2-methylnaphthalene (2.6 mg/kg). It 

should be noted that the ambient air within the Facility is tested periodically to ensure conditions 

are appropriate for occupational use. 
Table 3-1. Results for Composite Samples Compared to Environmental Action Levels

Tank 17 Removal ActionRed Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility

1Environmental Act

2Gross

Contamination

(Odors, etc.)

Urban Area 

Ecotoxicity 

Criteria

Direct

Exposure

Results Q Flag MDL RL Results Q Flag MDL RL Table F-2 Table K Table I-1 

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons(mg/kg) Diesel Range Organics 5040 34.5 111 5670 35.7 115 5.0E+02 5.0E+0

Gasoline Range Organics 111 868 4340 110 678 3390 1.0E+02 6.0E+0

Volatile Organic Compounds(μg/kg) Benzene ND 6.95 21.7 ND 5.42 16.9 5.0E+05 2.5E+04 1.1E+0

Toluene 296 26 86.8 ND 20.3 67.8 5.0E+05 9.3E+0Ethylbenzene 1270 26 86.8 90 20.3 67.8 5.0E+05 5.8E+0P & M -Xylene 2250 26 86.8 1950 20.3 67.8 4.4E+05 4.4E+0o-Xylene 49.2 J 26 86.8 1270 20.3 67.8 4.4E+05 4.4E+0Total Xylenes 2299.2 3220 4.4E+05 4.4E+0

Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons(μg/kg) Acenaphthene ND 8.32 27.7 154 8.56 28.5 1.0E+06 6.3E+0

Acenaphthylene ND 8.32 27.7 ND 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 3.2E+0Anthracene ND 8.32 27.7 ND 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 4.0E+04 3.4E+0Benzo(a)Anthracene 14.8 J 8.32 27.7 ND 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 4.0E+04 1.5E+0

Benzo[a]pyrene 16 8 J 8 32 27 7 ND 8 56 28 5 5 0E+05 4 0E+04 1 5E+0

Environmental Chemical Results

2Hum

Chemicals

RHTK17-1

06/10/2008

RHTK17-3

06/17/2008 

Page 1 of 1

Benzo[a]pyrene 16.8 J 8.32 27.7 ND 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 4.0E+04 1.5E+0Benzo[b]Fluoranthene ND 8.32 27.7 ND 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 1.5E+0Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 15.9 J 8.32 27.7 ND 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 4.0E+04 4.6E+0Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 8.32 27.7 ND 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 4.0E+04 1.5E+0Chrysene ND 8.32 27.7 ND 8.56 28.5 1.0E+06 4.0E+04 1.5E+0Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene ND 8.32 27.7 ND 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 1.5E+0Fluoranthene ND 8.32 27.7 ND 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 4.0E+04 4.6E+0Fluorene ND 8.32 27.7 156 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 4.4E+0Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene 18.6 J 8.32 27.7 ND 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 4.0E+04 1.5E+0Naphthalene 2140 83.2 277 3300 171 571 5.0E+05 4.0E+04 3.0E+0Phenanthrene 22.9 J 8.32 27.7 23 J 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 4.0E+04 4.4E+0Pyrene 8.63 J 8.32 27.7 ND 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 3.4E+01-Methylnaphthalene 7890 166 555 6850 171 571 5.0E+05 1.1E+02-Methylnaphthalene 8050 166 555 7290 171 571 5.0E+05 1.1E+0

Notes:

mg/kg milligrams per kilogram

μg/kg micrograms per killogram

Q Flag Data Quality Flag

J Result is between the MDL and the RL and is estimated

MDL Method Detection Limit

RL Reporting Limit

1 State of Hawaii Department of Health. 2005. Screening for Environmental Concerns at Sites with Contaminated Soil and Groundwater, Volume 1: Summary Tier 1 Lookup Ta

2 Based on unrestricted current or future land use. Considered adequate for residential housing, schools, medical facilities, day-care centers, parks and other sensitive uses.

5040 Environmental chemical result that exceeds one or more Tier 1 Environmental Action Level

5.0E+02 Chemical-specific Tier 1 Environmentl Action Level exceeded

Page 1 of 1
Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008 

4-1 

Section 4

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD EVALUATION 

This EHE is provided to assess the hazards associated with the JP-5 that remains in the 

subsurface from the limited release in the lower access tunnel at Tank 17 that occurred on March 

4, 2008. 

A previous investigation evaluated risk associated with releases of middle distillate fuels, such as 

JP-5, from the Facility (TEC 2007). The results of this investigation indicated the following 

items. 

• Soil vapor intrusion from releases associated with the USTs was potentially a significant 

pathway to the lower access tunnel, but not to buildings at ground surface. The Facility is 

ventilated to mitigate petroleum vapors associated with activities in the tunnels, and is 

periodically evaluated by an industrial hygienist to ensure that air quality within the 

tunnel is suitable for onsite workers. 

• Although the bedrock beneath several of the USTs was shown to have been impacted by 

past inadvertent releases from the Facility, there were no direct contact pathways to 

residential receptors or onsite workers due to the depth of the releases (greater than 300 

feet underground). 

• The bases of the USTs (where inadvertent releases would pool) are below the bottom of 

the adjacent valleys; therefore the seepage pathway to ground surface and the exposure 

pathway to terrestrial receptors are considered incomplete. 

• Groundwater beneath the Facility has been impacted by past inadvertent releases of 

petroleum at concentrations greater than the EALs for some chemicals; however, 

assuming JP-5 as the middle distillate petroleum mixture of concern, a three-dimensional 

MODFLOW groundwater model with reactive transport module RT3D showed that 

maximum concentrations of leachate from JP-5 would not impact the down-gradient 

drinking water well (U.S. Navy Well 2254-01). 

• Based on calculations using the model described above, a minimum release volume of 

16,000 gallons was required to impact the U.S. Navy Well 2254-01assuming a JP-5 fuel. 

The gross contamination (for staining and odor nuisance) EAL for TPH-DRO and TPH-GRO is 

100 mg/kg. 

• The remaining concentrations exceed this EAL for impacted bedrock located below the 

concrete floor of the lower access tunnel of the Facility. 

• The location of the impacted material is a secure facility. 

• Excavation in this area is not expected in the future, nor will this impacted material be 

used for backfill in the future since it is consolidated bedrock, and very difficult to 

excavate. 

• The Facility is strictly regulated for combustion sources to mitigate a potential 

flammability concern. 

• Gross contamination left in place not considered a significant environmental hazard for 

the reasons described above. 
Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008 

4-2 

The EALs associated with terrestrial receptors is site-specific. 

• The pathway to terrestrial receptors is incomplete since the impacted material is greater 

than 300 feet bgs and located beneath the concrete floor of the lower access tunnel in a 

secure facility, nor will this impacted material be used for backfill in the future since it is 

consolidated bedrock, and very difficult to excavate. 

• Impact to terrestrial receptors is not considered a significant environmental hazard for the 

reasons described above. 

Soil gas (for potential impact to indoor air, commercial/industrial) EAL is 140,000 μg/m3

, or 

approximately 20 ppmv for middle distillate fuels. 

• The maximum headspace reading at the bottom of the trench excavation was 225 ppmv, 

which exceeded the soil gas EAL by a factor of 11. 

• However, the EAL assumes residential exposure factors including: 

o Exposure duration of 25 years; 

o Exposure frequency of 250 days per year. 

• Actual exposure to the limited release at Tank 17 is expected to be much less: 

o Exposure duration of 10 years; 

o Exposure frequency of 1 day per year; 

o Actual estimated exposure is probably 600 times less than the 

commercial/industrial exposure factors, thus the site specific action level is 

12,500 ppmv, or 55 times more than the concentrations observed. 

• The Facility has a ventilation system designed to completely replenish the indoor air with 

ambient outdoor air from ground surface on the Red Hill ridgeline to ensure safe indoor 

air quality during activities associated with open UST manways, and other potential 

exposure events. 

• The Facility has periodic audits for air quality to ensure health and safety of onsite 

workers and visitors. 

• Soil gas intrusion to indoor air from the impacted material remaining in place is not 

considered a significant environmental hazard for the reasons described above. 

Soil leaching (potential for contaminants in soil to migrate in infiltrating groundwater to the 

groundwater table) EAL for TPH-DRO is 5,000 mg/kg and for TPH-GRO is 2,000 mg/kg. 

• The composite sample results from the excavation extents exceeded the EAL for TPHDRO (5,670 mg/kg) and was less than the EAL for TPH-GRO (110 mg/kg). 

• The risk assessment associated with the 2007 site investigation report (TEC, 2007) 

indicated that leachate was not a significant driver for impacting the down gradient U.S. 

Navy Well 2254-01. A significant liquid fuel on groundwater was necessary to impact 

the drinking water quality in this well. 

• The location of the remaining impacted soil is under the concrete floor of the Facility, 

and will not be experiencing significant infiltrating groundwater. 

• Leaching of contaminants from impacted material left in place to infiltrating groundwater 

is not considered a significant environmental hazard for the reasons described above. 
Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008 

5-1 

Section 5 

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

Based on the EHE presented in Section 4 of this document, it is concluded that, although 

contaminants remain in place in the bedrock beneath the lower access tunnel floor following the 

removal actions of June 10 and June 17, 2008, the risk and hazards associated with these 

contaminants are insignificant. It is estimated that less than one gallon of JP-5 remains in the 

subsurface from the three to four gallon release which occurred on March 4, 2008. 

It is recommended that no further action be taken to remove or destroy the remaining JP-5 due to 

the insignificant risk and technical difficulty associated with additional excavation adjacent to 

the wall of the Tank 17 access tunnel. It is further recommended that the trench excavation be 

completed as follows: 

1. Backfill with low-permeable clay material to approximately one foot below the floor 

surface. This will greatly reduce the migration pathway of water through the impacted 

material, and will likewise reduce the soil vapor migration pathway to floor surface. 

2. Place compaction gravel from the surface of the low-permeable clay to 6 inches from the 

ground surface. This material should be compacted to limit settling of the fill material 

over time that could destabilize the concrete floor of the tunnel. 

3. Finish the SVMP installation surface completion for the newly installed SVMPs. 

4. Complete the upper six inches with hardened concrete, finished to floor surface. 

 
Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008 

5-2 

This page is intentionally left blank. 
Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008 

6-1 

Section 6 

REFERENCES 

Dawson Group, Inc. 2006. Fourth Quarter 2005 Groundwater Sampling Report, Red Hill Fuel 

Storage Facility, Hawaii. February. 

Hawaii Administrative Rules, Title 11, Chapter 281, Subchapter 7. 

Mink, John F. and Lau, Stephen L., 1990. Aquifer Identification and Classification for O’ahu: 

Ground-Water Protection Strategy for Hawaii, Water Resources Research Center, University of 

Hawaii at Manoa, February 1990, Revised. 

State of Hawaii Department of Health. 2007. Long-Term Management of PetroleumContaminated Soil and Groundwater. June. 

State of Hawaii Department of Health. 2005a, 2008 updates. Screening for Environmental 

Concerns at Sites with Contaminated Soil and Groundwater, Volume 1: Summary Tier 1 Lookup 

Tables. Summer 2008. 

State of Hawaii Department of Health. 2005b. Use of May 2005 Environmental Action Levels 

(“EALs”) at Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites. Memo. 15 July. 

TPH Criteria Working Group (TCWG), 1998. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Criteria Working 

Group Series, Volume 2, Composition of Petroleum Mixtures, May. 

The Environmental Company, Inc. and AMEC Earth & Environmental, Inc. 2005. Red Hill 

Bulk Fuel Storage Facility Work Plan, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. June. 

TEC Inc. 2006. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Final – Addendum Planning Documents, 

Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. May. 

TEC Inc. 2007. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Final Technical Report, Pearl Harbor, 

Hawaii. August. 

TEC Inc. 2008. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Final Groundwater Protection Plan, Pearl 

Harbor, Hawaii. January. 

 
Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008 

6-2 

This page is intentionally left blank. 
Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008

Appendix A 

Photo-documentation 

 

Photo 1

Locations of PID measurements from the soil stockpile that was under 

the release. The stockpile was mostly covered in plastic.

Tank 17 Excavation June 10, 2008

Photo 2

Impacted bedrock in trench before excavation.

Tank 17 Excavation June 10, 2008
Photo 3

Excavation extents adjacent to Tank 17 bulkhead (5 ft below surface)

Tank 17 Excavation June 17, 2008

Photo 4

Excavation extents adjacent to Tank 17 bulkhead (Close-up).

Tank 17 Excavation June 17, 2008
Tank 17 Removal Action Report 

Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008

Appendix B 

Laboratory Analytical Reports 

SGS Work Order:

Contents:

Cover Page

Case Narrative

Final Report Pages

Quality Control Summary Forms

Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt Forms

Project:

Client:

SGS Environmental Services

 Alaska Division

Level II Laboratory Data Report

Released by: 

Note:

Unless otherwise noted, all quality assurance/quality control criteria is in compliance with the standards set forth by the proper regulatory authority, the 

SGS Quality Assurance Program Plan, and the National Environmental Accreditation Conference.

9121 Red Hill BFSF

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

1082739
CASE NARRATIVE Print Date: 7/21/2008

Workorder No.: 1082739

Project Name: 9121 Red Hill BFSF

Client Name: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

Lab Sample ID

Sample Comments

Sample Type Client Sample ID

Refer to the sample receipt form for information on sample condition.

1082739001

AK101/8021B - BFB (surrogate) recovery does not meet QC goals (biased high) due to hydrocarbon interference.

8015C - This sample was extracted one day outside of holding time.

8015C DRO - The pattern is consistent with a weathered middle distillate.

8015C - DRO MB result is greater than one-half the PQL, but less than PQL.

8270D SIMS - LCS recovery for fluoranthene and chrysene does not meet QC criteria (biased low). The reported results 

may be biased low in the associated samples.

PS RHTK17-1

837229

8270D SIMS - LCS recovery for fluoranthene and chrysene does not meet QC criteria (biased low). The reported results 

may be biased low in the associated samples.

LCS LCS for HBN 201830 [XXX/19540]

837230

8270D SIMS - LCS recovery for fluoranthene and chrysene does not meet QC criteria (biased low). The reported results 

may be biased low in the associated samples.

8270D SIMS - MS/MSD did not meet QC criteria for several compounds (biased high). See LCS for control.

MS 08-1576-G03(1082602003MS)

837231

8270D SIMS - LCS recovery for fluoranthene and chrysene does not meet QC criteria (biased low). The reported results 

may be biased low in the associated samples.

8270D SIMS - MS/MSD did not meet QC criteria for several compounds (biased high). See LCS for control.

MSD 08-1576-G03(1082602003MSD)

837477

AK101/8015C - MS recovery does not meet QC goals (biased high) due to hydrocarbon interference. The associated 

LCS/LCSD meet all QC goals.

MS RHTK17-1(1082739001MS)

837478

AK101/8015C - MSD recovery does not meet QC goals (biased high) due to hydrocarbon interference. The associated 

LCS/LCSD meet all QC goals.

MSD RHTK17-1(1082739001MSD)

837479

AK101/8015C - MS recovery does not meet QC goals (biased high) due to matrix interference. The associated LCS/LCSD 

meet all QC goals.

MS RHTK17-1(1082739001MS)

837480

AK101/8015C - MSD recovery does not meet QC goals (biased high) due to matrix interference. The associated LCS/LCSD 

meet all QC goals.

MSD RHTK17-1(1082739001MSD)

837656

8015C - DRO MB result is greater than one-half the PQL, but less than PQL.

MB MB for HBN 201919 [XXX/19550]

840742

8270D SIMS - CCV recovery for dibenzo[a,h]anthracene does not meet QC criteria (biased high). This analyte was not 

detected above above the PQL in the associated samples.

CCV CCV for HBN 202568 [XMS/4602]

841408

625 SIMS - CCV recovery for dibenzo[a,h]anthracene does not meet QC criteria (biased high). This analyte was not 

detected above above the PQL in the associated samples.

CCV CCV for HBN 202716 [XMS/4606]
841410

625 SIMS - CCV recovery for dibenzo[a,h]anthracene does not meet QC criteria (biased high). This analyte was not 

detected above above the PQL in the associated samples.

CCV CCV for HBN 202716 (XMS/4606)

842288

8270D SIMS - CCV recoveries do not meet QC criteria for indeno(1,2,3-c,d) pyrene and dibenzo(a,h)anthracene (biased 

high). The analytes are not detected above the PQL in the associated samples.

CCV CCV for HBN 202908 [XMS/4616]

842707

8270D SIMS - CCV recovery for dibenzo(a,h)anthracene does not meet QC criteria (biased high). The analyte does not read 

above the PQL in the associated samples.

CCV CCV for HBN 202984 [XMS/4621]

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage Alaska 99518

t (907) 562.2343 f (907) 561.5301 ww w.us.sgs.com

M em ber of SG S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)
Laboratory Analytical Report

Project:

Client:

Workorder No.:

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

1082739

Certification:

I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, 

both technically and for completeness, other than the conditions noted on the sample data 

sheet(s) and/or the case narrative. This certification applies only to the tested parameters and 

the specific sample(s) received at the laboratory.

1001 Bishop Street Ste 1400

ASB Tower

Honolulu, HI 96813

Attn: Jeff Hart

T: (808)528-1445 F:(808)528-0768

jshart@tecinc.com

Barbara Hager

Barbara.Hager@sgs.com

Project Manager

9121 Red Hill BFSF

If you have any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further assistance, please 

contact your SGS Project Manager.

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518

t (907) 562.2343 f (907) 561.5301 w w w .us.sgs.com

M em ber of S G S G roup
Enclosed are the analytical results associated with this workorder.

As required by the state of Alaska and the USEPA, a formal Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program is maintained by SGS. A copy of 

our Quality Assurance Plan (QAP), which outlines this program is available at your request.

The laboratory certification numbers are AK971-05 (DW), UST-005 (CS) and AK00971 (Micro) for ADEC and 001992 for NELAP (RCRA 

methods: 1020A, 1311, 6010B, 7470A,7471A,9040B,9045C, 9056, 9060, 9065, 8015B, 8021B, 8081A/8082, 8260B, 8270C).

Except as specifically noted, all statements and data in this report are in conformance to the provisions set forth by the SGS QAP, the 

National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program and, when applicable, other regulatory authorities.

If you have any questions regarding this report or if we can be of any assistance, please contact your SGS Project Manager at 

907-562-2343.

The following descriptors may be found on your report which will serve to further qualify the data.

MDL Method Detection Limit

PQL Practical Quantitation Limit (reporting limit).

CL Control Limit

U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.

F Indicates value that is greater than or equal to the MDL.

J The quantitation is an estimation.

ND Indicates the analyte is not detected

B Indicates the analyte is found in a blank associated with the sample.

* The analyte has exceeded allowable regulatory or control limits.

D The analyte concentration is the result of dilution.

GT Greater Than

LT Less Than

Q QC parameter out of acceptance range.

M A matrix effect was present.

E The analyte result is above the calibrated range.

R Rejected

DF Analytical Dilution Factor

JL The analyte was positively identified, but the quantitation is a low estimation.

<Surr> Surrogate QC spiked standard

<Surr/IS> Surrogate / Internal Standard QC spiked standard

QC Quality Control

QA Quality Assurance

MB Method Blank

LCS (D) Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)

MS(D) Matrix Spike (Duplicate)

BMS(D) Site Specific Matrix Spike

RPD Relative Percent Difference

ICV Initial Calibration Verification

CCV Continuous Calibration Verification

MSA Method of Standard Addition

Notes: Soil samples are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise specified

Print Date: 7/21/2008

Notes: All DRO/RRO analysese are integrated per SOP.

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage Alaska 99518

t (907) 562.2343 f (907) 561.5301 ww w.us.sgs.com

M em ber of SG S G roup
SAMPLE SUMMARY

Client Name: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

Project Name: 9121 Red Hill BFSF

Workorder No.: 1082739

Analytical Methods

Method Description Analytical Method

8270 PAH SIM Semi-Volatiles GC/MS 8270D SIMS

DRO by 8015B (S) SW8015C

GRO/BTEX (W) SW8015C

GRO/BTEX (W) SW8021B

Ignitability Seta Flash SW1020A

Percent Solids SM2540G SM20 2540G

Print Date: 7/21/2008

Sample ID Cross Reference

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID

1082739001 RHTK17-1

1082739002 RHTK17-2

1082739003 TB01

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage Alaska 99518

t (907) 562.2343 f (907) 561.5301 ww w.us.sgs.com

M em ber of SG S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: RHTK17-1 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time

SGS Ref. #: 1082739001 Collection Date/Time: 06/10/08 14:05

Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 06/12/08 11:27

Matrix: Soil/Solid (dry weight)

Percent Solids: 89.2

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result PQL/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Oils Laboratory

MDL DF

Ignitability Seta Flash GT200 70.0 70.0 degrees F 1 FHV4987

Batch Information

Analytical Batch: FHV4987 Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Method: SW1020A

Analysis Date/Time: 06/26/08 13:10 Container ID:1082739001-B

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: FWY

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518

t (907) 562.2343 f (907) 561.5301 w w w .us.sgs.com

M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: RHTK17-1 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time

SGS Ref. #: 1082739001 Collection Date/Time: 06/10/08 14:05

Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 06/12/08 11:27

Matrix: Soil/Solid (dry weight)

Percent Solids: 89.2

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result PQL/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Fuels Department

MDL DF

Gasoline Range Organics 111000 4340 868 ug/Kg 1 VFC9022 VXX18296

Benzene ND 21.7 6.95 ug/Kg 1 VFC9022 VXX18296

Toluene 49.2 J 86.8 26.0 ug/Kg 1 VFC9022 VXX18296

Ethylbenzene 296 86.8 26.0 ug/Kg 1 VFC9022 VXX18296

o-Xylene 1270 86.8 26.0 ug/Kg 1 VFC9022 VXX18296

P & M -Xylene 2250 86.8 26.0 ug/Kg 1 VFC9022 VXX18296

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 644 * 60-120 % 1 VFC9022 VXX18296

1,4-Difluorobenzene <surr> 90.2 85-110 % 1 VFC9022 VXX18296

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 32.883 g

Prep Extract Vol.: 28.55 mL

Analytical Batch: VFC9022

Analytical Method: SW8015C

Analysis Date/Time: 06/24/08 12:18

Prep Batch: VXX18296

Prep Method: SW5035A

Prep Date/Time: 06/10/08 14:05 Container ID:1082739001-A

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 32.883 g

Prep Extract Vol.: 28.55 mL

Analytical Batch: VFC9022

Analytical Method: SW8021B

Analysis Date/Time: 06/24/08 12:18

Prep Batch: VXX18296

Prep Method: SW5035A

Prep Date/Time: 06/10/08 14:05 Container ID:1082739001-A

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518

t (907) 562.2343 f (907) 561.5301 w w w .us.sgs.com

M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: RHTK17-1 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time

SGS Ref. #: 1082739001 Collection Date/Time: 06/10/08 14:05

Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 06/12/08 11:27

Matrix: Soil/Solid (dry weight)

Percent Solids: 89.2

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result PQL/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

MDL DF

Diesel Range Organics 5040 111 34.5 mg/Kg 10 XFC8010 XXX19550

5a Androstane <surr> 74.3 50-150 % 10 XFC8010 XXX19550

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 30.234 g

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XFC8010

Analytical Method: SW8015C

Analysis Date/Time: 06/26/08 14:44

Prep Batch: XXX19550

Prep Method: SW3550C

Prep Date/Time: 06/25/08 11:00 Container ID:1082739001-B

Dilution Factor: 10 Analyst: HKG

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518

t (907) 562.2343 f (907) 561.5301 w w w .us.sgs.com

M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: RHTK17-1 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time

SGS Ref. #: 1082739001 Collection Date/Time: 06/10/08 14:05

Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 06/12/08 11:27

Matrix: Soil/Solid (dry weight)

Percent Solids: 89.2

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result PQL/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

MDL DF

Acenaphthylene ND 27.7 8.32 ug/Kg 5 XMS4606 XXX19540

Acenaphthene ND 27.7 8.32 ug/Kg 5 XMS4606 XXX19540

Fluorene ND 27.7 8.32 ug/Kg 5 XMS4606 XXX19540

Phenanthrene 22.9 J 27.7 8.32 ug/Kg 5 XMS4606 XXX19540

Anthracene ND 27.7 8.32 ug/Kg 5 XMS4606 XXX19540

Fluoranthene ND 27.7 8.32 ug/Kg 5 XMS4606 XXX19540

Pyrene 8.63 J 27.7 8.32 ug/Kg 5 XMS4606 XXX19540

Benzo(a)Anthracene 14.8 J 27.7 8.32 ug/Kg 5 XMS4606 XXX19540

Chrysene ND 27.7 8.32 ug/Kg 5 XMS4606 XXX19540

Benzo[b]Fluoranthene ND 27.7 8.32 ug/Kg 5 XMS4606 XXX19540

Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 27.7 8.32 ug/Kg 5 XMS4606 XXX19540

Benzo[a]pyrene 16.8 J 27.7 8.32 ug/Kg 5 XMS4606 XXX19540

Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene 18.6 J 27.7 8.32 ug/Kg 5 XMS4606 XXX19540

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene ND 27.7 8.32 ug/Kg 5 XMS4606 XXX19540

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 15.9 J 27.7 8.32 ug/Kg 5 XMS4606 XXX19540

Naphthalene 2140 277 83.2 ug/Kg 50 XMS4616 XXX19540

1-Methylnaphthalene 7890 555 166 ug/Kg 100 XMS4621 XXX19540

2-Methylnaphthalene 8050 555 166 ug/Kg 100 XMS4621 XXX19540

Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 51.3 30-125 % 5 XMS4606 XXX19540

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 22.734 g

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XMS4606

Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS

Analysis Date/Time: 07/09/08 11:26

Prep Batch: XXX19540

Prep Method: SW3550C

Prep Date/Time: 06/23/08 13:30 Container ID:1082739001-B

Dilution Factor: 5 Analyst: JDH

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 22.734 g

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XMS4616

Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS

Analysis Date/Time: 07/17/08 14:17

Prep Batch: XXX19540

Prep Method: SW3550C

Prep Date/Time: 06/23/08 13:30 Container ID:

Dilution Factor: 50 Analyst: JDH

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 22.734 g

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XMS4621

Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS

Analysis Date/Time: 07/18/08 18:08

Prep Batch: XXX19540

Prep Method: SW3550C

Prep Date/Time: 06/23/08 13:30 Container ID:

Dilution Factor: 100 Analyst: JDH

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518

t (907) 562.2343 f (907) 561.5301 w w w .us.sgs.com

M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: RHTK17-1 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time

SGS Ref. #: 1082739001 Collection Date/Time: 06/10/08 14:05

Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 06/12/08 11:27

Matrix: Soil/Solid (dry weight)

Percent Solids: 89.2

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result PQL/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Solids

MDL DF

Total Solids 89.2 % 1 SPT7676

Batch Information

Analytical Batch: SPT7676 Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Method: SM20 2540G

Analysis Date/Time: 06/18/08 11:55 Container ID:1082739001-B

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JLK

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518

t (907) 562.2343 f (907) 561.5301 w w w .us.sgs.com

M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: TB01 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time

SGS Ref. #: 1082739003 Collection Date/Time: 06/10/08 08:05

Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 06/12/08 11:27

Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result PQL/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Fuels Department

MDL DF

Gasoline Range Organics ND 100 10.0 ug/L 1 VFC9029 VXX18305

Benzene ND 0.500 0.150 ug/L 1 VFC9029 VXX18305

Toluene ND 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VFC9029 VXX18305

Ethylbenzene ND 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VFC9029 VXX18305

o-Xylene ND 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VFC9029 VXX18305

P & M -Xylene ND 2.00 0.620 ug/L 1 VFC9029 VXX18305

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 93.3 50-150 % 1 VFC9029 VXX18305

1,4-Difluorobenzene <surr> 88.7 88-105 % 1 VFC9029 VXX18305

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL

Analytical Batch: VFC9029

Analytical Method: SW8015C

Analysis Date/Time: 06/24/08 10:44

Prep Batch: VXX18305

Prep Method: SW5030B

Prep Date/Time: 06/24/08 09:00 Container ID:1082739003-A

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL

Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL

Analytical Batch: VFC9029

Analytical Method: SW8021B

Analysis Date/Time: 06/24/08 10:44

Prep Batch: VXX18305

Prep Method: SW5030B

Prep Date/Time: 06/24/08 09:00 Container ID:1082739003-A

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518

t (907) 562.2343 f (907) 561.5301 w w w .us.sgs.com

M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:22

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

835914 Method Blank

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082739001

Parameter Results

Reporting/Control

Limit Units

Analysis

MDL Date

Solids

Total Solids 100 % 06/18/08

Instrument

Method

Batch SPT7676

SM20 2540G
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:22

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

837228 Method Blank

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

XXX19540

SW3550C

06/23/2008

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082739001

Parameter Results

Reporting/Control

Limit Units

Analysis

MDL Date

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

Acenaphthylene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/08/08

Acenaphthene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/08/08

Fluorene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/08/08

Phenanthrene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/08/08

Anthracene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/08/08

Fluoranthene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/08/08

Pyrene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/08/08

Benzo(a)Anthracene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/08/08

Chrysene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/08/08

Benzo[b]Fluoranthene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/08/08

Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/08/08

Benzo[a]pyrene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/08/08

Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/08/08

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/08/08

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/08/08

Naphthalene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/08/08

1-Methylnaphthalene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/08/08

2-Methylnaphthalene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/08/08

Surrogates 

Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 58.1 30-125 % 07/08/08

Instrument

Method

Batch XMS4602

8270D SIMS

HP 5890 Series II MS2 SVOA
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:22

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

837470 Method Blank

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

VXX18296

SW5035A

06/24/2008

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082739001

Parameter Results

Reporting/Control

Limit Units

Analysis

MDL Date

Volatile Fuels Department

Gasoline Range Organics ND 2500 500 ug/Kg 06/24/08

Surrogates 

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 94.8 60-120 % 06/24/08

Instrument

Method

Batch VFC9022

SW8015C

HP 5890 Series II PID+HECD VBA

Benzene ND 12.5 4.00 ug/Kg 06/24/08

Toluene ND 50.0 15.0 ug/Kg 06/24/08

Ethylbenzene ND 50.0 15.0 ug/Kg 06/24/08

o-Xylene ND 50.0 15.0 ug/Kg 06/24/08

P & M -Xylene ND 50.0 15.0 ug/Kg 06/24/08

Surrogates 

1,4-Difluorobenzene <surr> 91.4 85-110 % 06/24/08

Instrument

Method

Batch VFC9022

SW8021B

HP 5890 Series II PID+HECD VBA
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:22

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

837656 Method Blank

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

XXX19550

SW3550C

06/25/2008

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082739001

Parameter Results

Reporting/Control

Limit Units

Analysis

MDL Date

Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

Diesel Range Organics 6.12 J 9.95 3.08 mg/Kg 06/26/08

Surrogates 

5a Androstane <surr> 75.1 60-120 % 06/26/08

Instrument

Method

Batch XFC8010

SW8015C

HP 5890 Series II FID SV A R
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:22

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

837928 Method Blank

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

VXX18305

SW5030B

06/24/2008

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082739003

Parameter Results

Reporting/Control

Limit Units

Analysis

MDL Date

Volatile Fuels Department

Gasoline Range Organics ND 100 10.0 ug/L 06/24/08

Surrogates 

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 90.9 50-150 % 06/24/08

Instrument

Method

Batch VFC9029

SW8015C

HP 5890 Series II PID+FID VCA

Benzene ND 0.500 0.150 ug/L 06/24/08

Toluene ND 2.00 0.620 ug/L 06/24/08

Ethylbenzene ND 2.00 0.620 ug/L 06/24/08

o-Xylene ND 2.00 0.620 ug/L 06/24/08

P & M -Xylene ND 2.00 0.620 ug/L 06/24/08

Surrogates 

1,4-Difluorobenzene <surr> 91 88-105 % 06/24/08

Instrument

Method

Batch VFC9029

SW8021B

HP 5890 Series II PID+FID VCA
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:22

Batch

Method

Date Original

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Prep

9121 Red Hill BFSF

835915 Duplicate

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

1082604001

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082739001

Parameter

QC

Result

Analysis

Date RPD

RPD

Limits

Original

Result Units

Solids

Total Solids 76.3 78.7 % 3 (< 15 ) 06/18/2008

Batch

Method

Instrument

SPT7676

SM20 2540G
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:22

Batch

Method

Date Original

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Prep

9121 Red Hill BFSF

838156 Duplicate

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082739001

Parameter

QC

Result

Analysis

Date RPD

RPD

Limits

Original

Result Units

Oils Laboratory

Ignitability Seta Flash GT200 degrees F 06/26/2008

Batch

Method

Instrument

FHV4987

SW1020A

Seta-Flash Flsh Pnt Tester
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:22

Batch

Method

Date Original

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Prep

9121 Red Hill BFSF

838157 Duplicate

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082739001

Parameter

QC

Result

Analysis

Date RPD

RPD

Limits

Original

Result Units

Oils Laboratory

Ignitability Seta Flash GT200 degrees F 06/26/2008

Batch

Method

Instrument

FHV4987

SW1020A

Seta-Flash Flsh Pnt Tester
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:22

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

837229 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

XXX19540

SW3550C

06/23/2008

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082739001

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

Acenaphthylene LCS 13.5 61 ( 45-102 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Acenaphthene LCS 10.8 49 ( 45-99 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Fluorene LCS 12.2 55 ( 50-107 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Phenanthrene LCS 12.3 56 ( 50-110 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Anthracene LCS 12.6 57 ( 28-103 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Fluoranthene LCS 11.5 52 * ( 55-115 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Pyrene LCS 10.5 47 ( 45-120 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Benzo(a)Anthracene LCS 15.1 68 ( 40-110 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Chrysene LCS 11.2 51 * ( 55-110 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Benzo[b]Fluoranthene LCS 14.2 64 ( 45-115 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Benzo[k]fluoranthene LCS 13.9 63 ( 45-120 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Benzo[a]pyrene LCS 12.3 55 ( 10-102 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene LCS 18.2 82 ( 40-120 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene LCS 19.6 88 ( 40-125 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene LCS 16.2 73 ( 40-118 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Naphthalene LCS 10.5 48 ( 40-92 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

1-Methylnaphthalene LCS 10.5 47 ( 30-97 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

2-Methylnaphthalene LCS 10.6 48 ( 45-96 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Surrogates 

Terphenyl-d14 <surr> LCS 59 ( 30-125 ) 07/08/2008
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:22

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

837229 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

XXX19540

SW3550C

06/23/2008

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

Batch

Method

Instrument

XMS4602

8270D SIMS

HP 5890 Series II MS2 SVOA
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:22

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

837471 Lab Control Sample

837472 Lab Control Sample Duplicate

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

VXX18296

SW5035A

06/24/2008

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082739001

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Volatile Fuels Department

Benzene LCS 1360 109 ( 80-125 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

LCSD 1360 109 0 (< 20 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

Toluene LCS 1310 105 ( 85-120 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

LCSD 1320 106 1 (< 20 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

Ethylbenzene LCS 1330 106 ( 85-125 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

LCSD 1340 108 1 (< 20 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

o-Xylene LCS 1310 105 ( 85-125 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

LCSD 1320 106 1 (< 20 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

P & M -Xylene LCS 2760 110 ( 85-125 ) 2500 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

LCSD 2790 112 1 (< 20 ) 2500 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

Surrogates 

1,4-Difluorobenzene <surr> LCS 98 ( 85-110 ) 06/24/2008

LCSD 98 0 06/24/2008

Batch

Method

Instrument

VFC9022

SW8021B

HP 5890 Series II PID+HECD VBA
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:22

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

837473 Lab Control Sample

837474 Lab Control Sample Duplicate

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

VXX18296

SW5035A

06/24/2008

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082739001

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Volatile Fuels Department

Gasoline Range Organics LCS 11400 102 ( 75-115 ) 11300 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

LCSD 11000 98 4 (< 20 ) 11300 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

Surrogates 

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> LCS 96 ( 50-150 ) 06/24/2008

LCSD 99 3 06/24/2008

Batch

Method

Instrument

VFC9022

SW8015C

HP 5890 Series II PID+HECD VBA
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:22

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

837916 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

XXX19550

SW3550C

06/25/2008

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082739001

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

Diesel Range Organics LCS 133 80 ( 75-125 ) 166 mg/Kg 06/26/2008

Surrogates 

5a Androstane <surr> LCS 90 ( 60-120 ) 06/26/2008

Batch

Method

Instrument

XFC8010

SW8015C

HP 5890 Series II FID SV A R
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:22

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

837929 Lab Control Sample

837930 Lab Control Sample Duplicate

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

VXX18305

SW5030B

06/24/2008

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082739003

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Volatile Fuels Department

Benzene LCS 88.3 88 ( 80-120 ) 100 ug/L 06/24/2008

LCSD 87.9 88 0 (< 20 ) 100 ug/L 06/24/2008

Toluene LCS 90.9 91 ( 80-120 ) 100 ug/L 06/24/2008

LCSD 90.7 91 0 (< 20 ) 100 ug/L 06/24/2008

Ethylbenzene LCS 94.0 94 ( 87-125 ) 100 ug/L 06/24/2008

LCSD 93.6 94 0 (< 20 ) 100 ug/L 06/24/2008

o-Xylene LCS 93.0 93 ( 85-120 ) 100 ug/L 06/24/2008

LCSD 92.8 93 0 (< 20 ) 100 ug/L 06/24/2008

P & M -Xylene LCS 185 93 ( 87-125 ) 200 ug/L 06/24/2008

LCSD 185 93 0 (< 20 ) 200 ug/L 06/24/2008

Surrogates 

1,4-Difluorobenzene <surr> LCS 99 ( 88-105 ) 06/24/2008

LCSD 98 0 06/24/2008

Batch

Method

Instrument

VFC9029

SW8021B

HP 5890 Series II PID+FID VCA
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:22

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

837931 Lab Control Sample

837932 Lab Control Sample Duplicate

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

VXX18305

SW5030B

06/24/2008

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082739003

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Volatile Fuels Department

Gasoline Range Organics LCS 206 103 ( 79-108 ) 200 ug/L 06/24/2008

LCSD 199 100 3 (< 20 ) 200 ug/L 06/24/2008

Surrogates 

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> LCS 93 ( 50-150 ) 06/24/2008

LCSD 94 2 06/24/2008

Batch

Method

Instrument

VFC9029

SW8015C

HP 5890 Series II PID+FID VCA
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:22

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

838082 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Other Liquids

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082739001

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Oils Laboratory

Ignitability Seta Flash LCS 79.0 101 ( 98.5-101.5 ) 78 degrees F06/26/2008

Batch

Method

Instrument

FHV4987

SW1020A

Seta-Flash Flsh Pnt Tester
Matrix

SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:22

Batch

Method

Date

Original

Prep

837230 Matrix Spike

837231 Matrix Spike Duplicate

1082602003

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

XXX19540

Sonication Extraction Soil 8270 PAH S

06/23/2008

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082739001

Parameter

QC

Result

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

Date

MS/MSD

Limits RPD

RPD

Limits

Original

Result Qualifiers

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

Acenaphthylene MS ND 25.4 110* ( 45-102 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

MSD 21.2 93 18 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Acenaphthene MS ND 28.4 123* ( 45-99 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

MSD 23.2 101* 20 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Fluorene MS ND 27.9 120* ( 50-107 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

MSD 23.8 104 16 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Phenanthrene MS 7.15 36.2 125* ( 50-110 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

MSD 31.8 107 13 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Anthracene MS 4.61 J 18.3 59 ( 28-103 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

MSD 17.2 55 6 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Fluoranthene MS 49.4 109 257* ( 55-115 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

MSD 90.9 181* 18 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Pyrene MS 49.1 98.6 214* ( 45-120 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

MSD 83.0 148* 17 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Benzo(a)Anthracene MS 23.9 58.2 148* ( 40-110 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

MSD 50.2 114* 15 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Chrysene MS 25.7 74.3 210* ( 55-110 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

MSD 60.6 152* 20 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Benzo[b]Fluoranthene MS 28.6 92.9 278* ( 45-115 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

MSD 75.3 204* 21 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Benzo[k]fluoranthene MS 13.8 50.4 158* ( 45-120 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

MSD 39.2 111 25 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Benzo[a]pyrene MS 19.8 59.1 170* ( 10-102 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

MSD 48.4 124* 20 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene MS 16.6 56.0 170* ( 40-120 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

MSD 47.9 136* 16 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene MS ND 31.8 137* ( 40-125 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

MSD 28.7 125 10 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene MS 15.2 52.8 162* ( 40-118 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

MSD 45.0 130* 16 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Naphthalene MS ND 23.0 99* ( 40-92 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

MSD 17.9 78 25 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

1-Methylnaphthalene MS ND 28.2 122* ( 30-97 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

MSD 21.4 93 27 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

2-Methylnaphthalene MS ND 14.4 62 ( 45-96 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

MSD 12.9 56 11 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Surrogates 
Matrix

SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:22

Batch

Method

Date

Original

Prep

837230 Matrix Spike

837231 Matrix Spike Duplicate

1082602003

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

XXX19540

Sonication Extraction Soil 8270 PAH S

06/23/2008

Parameter

QC

Result

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

Date

MS/MSD

Limits RPD

RPD

Limits

Original

Result Qualifiers

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

Terphenyl-d14 <surr> MS 13.4 58 ( 30-125 ) 07/08/2008

MSD 13.0 57 3 07/08/2008

Batch

Method

Instrument

XMS4602

8270D SIMS

HP 5890 Series II MS2 SVOA
Matrix

SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:22

Batch

Method

Date

Original

Prep

837477 Matrix Spike

837478 Matrix Spike Duplicate

1082739001

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

VXX18296

GRO Extraction (S)

06/24/2008

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082739001

Parameter

QC

Result

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

Date

MS/MSD

Limits RPD

RPD

Limits

Original

Result Qualifiers

Volatile Fuels Department

Benzene MS ND 1300 54* ( 80-125 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

MSD 1244 51* 4 (< 20 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

Toluene MS 49.2 J 3969 161* ( 85-120 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

MSD 3991 162* 1 (< 20 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

Ethylbenzene MS 296 985 27* ( 85-125 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

MSD 998 27* 1 (< 20 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

o-Xylene MS 1270 3565 88 ( 85-125 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

MSD 3655 92 2 (< 20 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

P & M -Xylene MS 2250 4675 44* ( 85-125 ) 4865 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

MSD 4742 46* 1 (< 20 ) 4865 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

Surrogates 

1,4-Difluorobenzene <surr> MS 2321 96 ( 85-110 ) 06/24/2008

MSD 2321 96 0 06/24/2008

Batch

Method

Instrument

VFC9022

SW8021B

HP 5890 Series II PID+HECD VBA
Matrix

SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:22

Batch

Method

Date

Original

Prep

837479 Matrix Spike

837480 Matrix Spike Duplicate

1082739001

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

VXX18296

GRO Extraction (S)

06/24/2008

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082739001

Parameter

QC

Result

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

Date

MS/MSD

Limits RPD

RPD

Limits

Original

Result Qualifiers

Volatile Fuels Department

Gasoline Range Organics MS 111000 152466 126* ( 75-115 ) 21861 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

MSD 155830 140* 2 (< 20 ) 21861 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

Surrogates 

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> MS 14574 684* ( 50-150 ) 06/24/2008

MSD 14798 694* 2 06/24/2008

Batch

Method

Instrument

VFC9022

SW8015C

HP 5890 Series II PID+HECD VBA

Hager, Barbara (Anchorage)

From: Hart, Jeff [jshart@tecinc.com]

Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 12:26 PM

To: Hager, Barbara (Anchorage)

Subject: RE: 1082739 9121 Red Hill BFSF

Page 1 of 2

6/27/2008

Please proceed.

TEC Inc.

Jeff S. Hart, R.G.

Principal, Senior Project Manager

1001 Bishop Street, Suite 1400

ASB Tower

Honolulu, Hawaii 96813

Telephone (808) 528-1445

Facsimile (808) 528-0768

From: Hager, Barbara (Anchorage) [mailto:Barbara.Hager@sgs.com] 

Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:10 AM 

To: Hart, Jeff 

Cc: Homestead, Charles (Anchorage) 

Subject: 1082739 9121 Red Hill BFSF

 

Jeff

Due to lab error this sample was extract 1 day outside the 14 day holding time.

Please let me know if you would like to proceed with analysis.

Thanks

Barbara

Barbara A. Hager

SGS Environmental Services Inc.

Alaska Division Project Manager

200 West Potter Drive

Anchorage, Alaska 99518

Phone: (907) 562-2343 

Direct: (907) 550-3211 

Fax: (907) 561-5301

SGS sends analytical reports via the Internet as Portable Document Format (PDF) files. Reports in this format, with authenticated electronic signatures, are 

considered official reports. No hard copy reports will be sent either by fax or U.S. Postal Service unless otherwise requested. You may distribute your PDF 

files electronically or as printed hardcopies, as long as they are distributed in their entirety.

 

Information in this email and any attachments is confidential and 

intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed 

or otherwise directed. Please note that any views or opinions presented 

in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 

represent those of the Company. 

Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for 

the presence of viruses. The Company accepts no liability for any damage






SGS Work Order:

Contents:

Cover Page

Case Narrative

Final Report Pages

Quality Control Summary Forms

Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt Forms

Project:

Client:

SGS Environmental Services

 Alaska Division

Level II Laboratory Data Report

Released by: 

Note:

Unless otherwise noted, all quality assurance/quality control criteria is in compliance with the standards set forth by the proper regulatory authority, the 

SGS Quality Assurance Program Plan, and the National Environmental Accreditation Conference.

9121 Red Hill BFSF

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

1082865

CASE NARRATIVE Print Date: 7/21/2008

Workorder No.: 1082865

Project Name: 9121 Red Hill BFSF

Client Name: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

Lab Sample ID

Sample Comments

Sample Type Client Sample ID

Refer to the sample receipt form for information on sample condition.

1082865001

AK101/8021B - BFB (surrogate) recovery does not meet QC goals (biased high) due to hydrocarbon interference.

8015C DRO - The pattern is consistent with a weathered middle distillate.

8015C - DRO MB result is greater than one-half the PQL, but less than PQL.

PS RHTK17-3

837477

AK101/8015C - MS recovery does not meet QC goals (biased high) due to hydrocarbon interference. The associated 

LCS/LCSD meet all QC goals.

MS RHTK17-1(1082739001MS)

837478

AK101/8015C - MSD recovery does not meet QC goals (biased high) due to hydrocarbon interference. The associated 

LCS/LCSD meet all QC goals.

MSD RHTK17-1(1082739001MSD)

837479

AK101/8015C - MS recovery does not meet QC goals (biased high) due to matrix interference. The associated LCS/LCSD 

meet all QC goals.

MS RHTK17-1(1082739001MS)

837480

AK101/8015C - MSD recovery does not meet QC goals (biased high) due to matrix interference. The associated LCS/LCSD 

meet all QC goals.

MSD RHTK17-1(1082739001MSD)

837656

8015C - DRO MB result is greater than one-half the PQL, but less than PQL.

MB MB for HBN 201919 [XXX/19550]

842288

8270D SIMS - CCV recoveries do not meet QC criteria for indeno(1,2,3-c,d) pyrene and dibenzo(a,h)anthracene (biased 

high). The analytes are not detected above the PQL in the associated samples.

CCV CCV for HBN 202908 [XMS/4616]

842707

8270D SIMS - CCV recovery for dibenzo(a,h)anthracene does not meet QC criteria (biased high). The analyte does not read 

above the PQL in the associated samples.

CCV CCV for HBN 202984 [XMS/4621]

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage Alaska 99518

t (907) 562.2343 f (907) 561.5301 ww w.us.sgs.com

M em ber of SG S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)
Laboratory Analytical Report

Project:

Client:

Workorder No.:

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

1082865

Certification:

I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, 

both technically and for completeness, other than the conditions noted on the sample data 

sheet(s) and/or the case narrative. This certification applies only to the tested parameters and 

the specific sample(s) received at the laboratory.

1001 Bishop Street Ste 1400

ASB Tower

Honolulu, HI 96813

Attn: Jeff Hart

T: (808)528-1445 F:(808)528-0768

jshart@tecinc.com

Barbara Hager

Barbara.Hager@sgs.com

Project Manager

9121 Red Hill BFSF

If you have any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further assistance, please 

contact your SGS Project Manager.

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518

t (907) 562.2343 f (907) 561.5301 w w w .us.sgs.com

M em ber of S G S G roup
Enclosed are the analytical results associated with this workorder.

As required by the state of Alaska and the USEPA, a formal Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program is maintained by SGS. A copy of 

our Quality Assurance Plan (QAP), which outlines this program is available at your request.

The laboratory certification numbers are AK971-05 (DW), UST-005 (CS) and AK00971 (Micro) for ADEC and 001992 for NELAP (RCRA 

methods: 1020A, 1311, 6010B, 7470A,7471A,9040B,9045C, 9056, 9060, 9065, 8015B, 8021B, 8081A/8082, 8260B, 8270C).

Except as specifically noted, all statements and data in this report are in conformance to the provisions set forth by the SGS QAP, the 

National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program and, when applicable, other regulatory authorities.

If you have any questions regarding this report or if we can be of any assistance, please contact your SGS Project Manager at 

907-562-2343.

The following descriptors may be found on your report which will serve to further qualify the data.

MDL Method Detection Limit

PQL Practical Quantitation Limit (reporting limit).

CL Control Limit

U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.

F Indicates value that is greater than or equal to the MDL.

J The quantitation is an estimation.

ND Indicates the analyte is not detected

B Indicates the analyte is found in a blank associated with the sample.

* The analyte has exceeded allowable regulatory or control limits.

D The analyte concentration is the result of dilution.

GT Greater Than

LT Less Than

Q QC parameter out of acceptance range.

M A matrix effect was present.

E The analyte result is above the calibrated range.

R Rejected

DF Analytical Dilution Factor

JL The analyte was positively identified, but the quantitation is a low estimation.

<Surr> Surrogate QC spiked standard

<Surr/IS> Surrogate / Internal Standard QC spiked standard

QC Quality Control

QA Quality Assurance

MB Method Blank

LCS (D) Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)

MS(D) Matrix Spike (Duplicate)

BMS(D) Site Specific Matrix Spike

RPD Relative Percent Difference

ICV Initial Calibration Verification

CCV Continuous Calibration Verification

MSA Method of Standard Addition

Notes: Soil samples are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise specified

Print Date: 7/21/2008

Notes: All DRO/RRO analysese are integrated per SOP.

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage Alaska 99518

t (907) 562.2343 f (907) 561.5301 ww w.us.sgs.com

M em ber of SG S G roup
SAMPLE SUMMARY

Client Name: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

Project Name: 9121 Red Hill BFSF

Workorder No.: 1082865

Analytical Methods

Method Description Analytical Method

8270 PAH SIM Semi-Volatiles GC/MS 8270D SIMS

DRO by 8015B (S) SW8015C

GRO/BTEX (W) SW8015C

GRO/BTEX (W) SW8021B

Ignitability Seta Flash SW1020A

Percent Solids SM2540G SM20 2540G

Print Date: 7/21/2008

Sample ID Cross Reference

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID

1082865001 RHTK17-3

1082865002 TB01

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage Alaska 99518

t (907) 562.2343 f (907) 561.5301 ww w.us.sgs.com

M em ber of SG S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: RHTK17-3 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time

SGS Ref. #: 1082865001 Collection Date/Time: 06/17/08 11:05

Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 06/19/08 11:20

Matrix: Soil/Solid (dry weight)

Percent Solids: 86.7

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result PQL/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Oils Laboratory

MDL DF

Ignitability Seta Flash GT200 70.0 70.0 degrees F 1 FHV4987

Batch Information

Analytical Batch: FHV4987 Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Method: SW1020A

Analysis Date/Time: 06/26/08 13:10 Container ID:1082865001-C

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: FWY

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518

t (907) 562.2343 f (907) 561.5301 w w w .us.sgs.com

M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: RHTK17-3 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time

SGS Ref. #: 1082865001 Collection Date/Time: 06/17/08 11:05

Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 06/19/08 11:20

Matrix: Soil/Solid (dry weight)

Percent Solids: 86.7

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result PQL/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Fuels Department

MDL DF

Gasoline Range Organics 110000 3390 678 ug/Kg 1 VFC9022 VXX18296

Benzene ND 16.9 5.42 ug/Kg 1 VFC9022 VXX18296

Toluene ND 67.8 20.3 ug/Kg 1 VFC9022 VXX18296

Ethylbenzene 90.0 67.8 20.3 ug/Kg 1 VFC9022 VXX18296

o-Xylene 1270 67.8 20.3 ug/Kg 1 VFC9022 VXX18296

P & M -Xylene 1950 67.8 20.3 ug/Kg 1 VFC9022 VXX18296

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 856 * 60-120 % 1 VFC9022 VXX18296

1,4-Difluorobenzene <surr> 89.9 85-110 % 1 VFC9022 VXX18296

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 45.945 g

Prep Extract Vol.: 31.13 mL

Analytical Batch: VFC9022

Analytical Method: SW8015C

Analysis Date/Time: 06/24/08 12:36

Prep Batch: VXX18296

Prep Method: SW5035A

Prep Date/Time: 06/17/08 11:05 Container ID:1082865001-A

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 45.945 g

Prep Extract Vol.: 31.13 mL

Analytical Batch: VFC9022

Analytical Method: SW8021B

Analysis Date/Time: 06/24/08 12:36

Prep Batch: VXX18296

Prep Method: SW5035A

Prep Date/Time: 06/17/08 11:05 Container ID:1082865001-A

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518

t (907) 562.2343 f (907) 561.5301 w w w .us.sgs.com

M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: RHTK17-3 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time

SGS Ref. #: 1082865001 Collection Date/Time: 06/17/08 11:05

Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 06/19/08 11:20

Matrix: Soil/Solid (dry weight)

Percent Solids: 86.7

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result PQL/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

MDL DF

Diesel Range Organics 5670 115 35.7 mg/Kg 10 XFC8010 XXX19550

5a Androstane <surr> 83 50-150 % 10 XFC8010 XXX19550

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 30.072 g

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XFC8010

Analytical Method: SW8015C

Analysis Date/Time: 06/26/08 15:05

Prep Batch: XXX19550

Prep Method: SW3550C

Prep Date/Time: 06/25/08 11:00 Container ID:1082865001-B

Dilution Factor: 10 Analyst: HKG

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518

t (907) 562.2343 f (907) 561.5301 w w w .us.sgs.com

M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: RHTK17-3 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time

SGS Ref. #: 1082865001 Collection Date/Time: 06/17/08 11:05

Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 06/19/08 11:20

Matrix: Soil/Solid (dry weight)

Percent Solids: 86.7

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result PQL/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

MDL DF

Acenaphthylene ND 28.5 8.56 ug/Kg 5 XMS4616 XXX19571

Acenaphthene 154 28.5 8.56 ug/Kg 5 XMS4616 XXX19571

Fluorene 156 28.5 8.56 ug/Kg 5 XMS4616 XXX19571

Phenanthrene 23.0 J 28.5 8.56 ug/Kg 5 XMS4616 XXX19571

Anthracene ND 28.5 8.56 ug/Kg 5 XMS4616 XXX19571

Fluoranthene ND 28.5 8.56 ug/Kg 5 XMS4616 XXX19571

Pyrene ND 28.5 8.56 ug/Kg 5 XMS4616 XXX19571

Benzo(a)Anthracene ND 28.5 8.56 ug/Kg 5 XMS4616 XXX19571

Chrysene ND 28.5 8.56 ug/Kg 5 XMS4616 XXX19571

Benzo[b]Fluoranthene ND 28.5 8.56 ug/Kg 5 XMS4616 XXX19571

Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 28.5 8.56 ug/Kg 5 XMS4616 XXX19571

Benzo[a]pyrene ND 28.5 8.56 ug/Kg 5 XMS4616 XXX19571

Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene ND 28.5 8.56 ug/Kg 5 XMS4616 XXX19571

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene ND 28.5 8.56 ug/Kg 5 XMS4616 XXX19571

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND 28.5 8.56 ug/Kg 5 XMS4616 XXX19571

Naphthalene 3300 571 171 ug/Kg 100 XMS4621 XXX19571

1-Methylnaphthalene 6850 571 171 ug/Kg 100 XMS4621 XXX19571

2-Methylnaphthalene 7290 571 171 ug/Kg 100 XMS4621 XXX19571

Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 92.4 30-125 % 5 XMS4616 XXX19571

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 22.745 g

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XMS4616

Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS

Analysis Date/Time: 07/17/08 13:45

Prep Batch: XXX19571

Prep Method: SW3550C

Prep Date/Time: 07/01/08 16:50 Container ID:1082865001-B

Dilution Factor: 5 Analyst: JDH

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 22.745 g

Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Batch: XMS4621

Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS

Analysis Date/Time: 07/18/08 17:35

Prep Batch: XXX19571

Prep Method: SW3550C

Prep Date/Time: 07/01/08 16:50 Container ID:

Dilution Factor: 100 Analyst: JDH

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518

t (907) 562.2343 f (907) 561.5301 w w w .us.sgs.com

M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: RHTK17-3 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time

SGS Ref. #: 1082865001 Collection Date/Time: 06/17/08 11:05

Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 06/19/08 11:20

Matrix: Soil/Solid (dry weight)

Percent Solids: 86.7

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result PQL/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Solids

MDL DF

Total Solids 86.7 % 1 SPT7683

Batch Information

Analytical Batch: SPT7683 Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Method: SM20 2540G

Analysis Date/Time: 06/21/08 15:25 Container ID:1082865001-B

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: BJS

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518

t (907) 562.2343 f (907) 561.5301 w w w .us.sgs.com

M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: TB01 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time

SGS Ref. #: 1082865002 Collection Date/Time: 06/17/08 08:05

Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 06/19/08 11:20

Matrix: Soil/Solid (dry weight)

Percent Solids: 100

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result PQL/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Volatile Fuels Department

MDL DF

Gasoline Range Organics 1770 J 2640 527 ug/Kg 1 VFC9022 VXX18296

Benzene ND 13.2 4.22 ug/Kg 1 VFC9022 VXX18296

Toluene ND 52.7 15.8 ug/Kg 1 VFC9022 VXX18296

Ethylbenzene ND 52.7 15.8 ug/Kg 1 VFC9022 VXX18296

o-Xylene ND 52.7 15.8 ug/Kg 1 VFC9022 VXX18296

P & M -Xylene ND 52.7 15.8 ug/Kg 1 VFC9022 VXX18296

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 91 60-120 % 1 VFC9022 VXX18296

1,4-Difluorobenzene <surr> 90 85-110 % 1 VFC9022 VXX18296

Batch Information

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 47.4 g

Prep Extract Vol.: 25 mL

Analytical Batch: VFC9022

Analytical Method: SW8015C

Analysis Date/Time: 06/24/08 15:32

Prep Batch: VXX18296

Prep Method: SW5035A

Prep Date/Time: 06/17/08 08:05 Container ID:1082865002-A

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 47.4 g

Prep Extract Vol.: 25 mL

Analytical Batch: VFC9022

Analytical Method: SW8021B

Analysis Date/Time: 06/24/08 15:32

Prep Batch: VXX18296

Prep Method: SW5035A

Prep Date/Time: 06/17/08 08:05 Container ID:1082865002-A

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518

t (907) 562.2343 f (907) 561.5301 w w w .us.sgs.com

M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)
The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: TB01 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time

SGS Ref. #: 1082865002 Collection Date/Time: 06/17/08 08:05

Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Receipt Date/Time: 06/19/08 11:20

Matrix: Soil/Solid (dry weight)

Percent Solids: 100

Analytical 

Batch

Prep

Parameter Result PQL/CL Units Batch Qualifiers

Solids

MDL DF

Total Solids 100 % 1 SPT7686

Batch Information

Analytical Batch: SPT7686 Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 1 mL

Analytical Method: SM20 2540G

Analysis Date/Time: 06/23/08 19:25 Container ID:1082865002-A

Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: KDC

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518

t (907) 562.2343 f (907) 561.5301 w w w .us.sgs.com

M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:25

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

836870 Method Blank

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082865001

Parameter Results

Reporting/Control

Limit Units

Analysis

MDL Date

Solids

Total Solids 100 % 06/21/08

Instrument

Method

Batch SPT7683

SM20 2540G
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:25

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

837318 Method Blank

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082865002

Parameter Results

Reporting/Control

Limit Units

Analysis

MDL Date

Solids

Total Solids 100 % 06/23/08

Instrument

Method

Batch SPT7686

SM20 2540G
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:25

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

837470 Method Blank

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

VXX18296

SW5035A

06/24/2008

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082865001, 1082865002

Parameter Results

Reporting/Control

Limit Units

Analysis

MDL Date

Volatile Fuels Department

Gasoline Range Organics ND 2500 500 ug/Kg 06/24/08

Surrogates 

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 94.8 60-120 % 06/24/08

Instrument

Method

Batch VFC9022

SW8015C

HP 5890 Series II PID+HECD VBA

Benzene ND 12.5 4.00 ug/Kg 06/24/08

Toluene ND 50.0 15.0 ug/Kg 06/24/08

Ethylbenzene ND 50.0 15.0 ug/Kg 06/24/08

o-Xylene ND 50.0 15.0 ug/Kg 06/24/08

P & M -Xylene ND 50.0 15.0 ug/Kg 06/24/08

Surrogates 

1,4-Difluorobenzene <surr> 91.4 85-110 % 06/24/08

Instrument

Method

Batch VFC9022

SW8021B

HP 5890 Series II PID+HECD VBA
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:25

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

837656 Method Blank

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

XXX19550

SW3550C

06/25/2008

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082865001

Parameter Results

Reporting/Control

Limit Units

Analysis

MDL Date

Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

Diesel Range Organics 6.12 J 9.95 3.08 mg/Kg 06/26/08

Surrogates 

5a Androstane <surr> 75.1 60-120 % 06/26/08

Instrument

Method

Batch XFC8010

SW8015C

HP 5890 Series II FID SV A R
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:25

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

839060 Method Blank

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

XXX19571

SW3550C

07/01/2008

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082865001

Parameter Results

Reporting/Control

Limit Units

Analysis

MDL Date

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

Acenaphthylene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/15/08

Acenaphthene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/15/08

Fluorene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/15/08

Phenanthrene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/15/08

Anthracene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/15/08

Fluoranthene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/15/08

Pyrene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/15/08

Benzo(a)Anthracene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/15/08

Chrysene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/15/08

Benzo[b]Fluoranthene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/15/08

Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/15/08

Benzo[a]pyrene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/15/08

Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/15/08

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/15/08

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/15/08

Naphthalene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/15/08

1-Methylnaphthalene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/15/08

2-Methylnaphthalene ND 4.94 1.48 ug/Kg 07/15/08

Surrogates 

Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 90.4 30-125 % 07/15/08

Instrument

Method

Batch XMS4613

8270D SIMS

HP 5890 Series II MS2 SVOA
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:25

Batch

Method

Date Original

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Prep

9121 Red Hill BFSF

836871 Duplicate

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

1082869002

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082865001

Parameter

QC

Result

Analysis

Date RPD

RPD

Limits

Original

Result Units

Solids

Total Solids 87.8 87.8 % 0 (< 15 ) 06/21/2008

Batch

Method

Instrument

SPT7683

SM20 2540G
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:25

Batch

Method

Date Original

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Prep

9121 Red Hill BFSF

837319 Duplicate

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

1082834017

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082865002

Parameter

QC

Result

Analysis

Date RPD

RPD

Limits

Original

Result Units

Solids

Total Solids 84.6 84.4 % 0 (< 15 ) 06/23/2008

Batch

Method

Instrument

SPT7686

SM20 2540G
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:25

Batch

Method

Date Original

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Prep

9121 Red Hill BFSF

838156 Duplicate

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082865001

Parameter

QC

Result

Analysis

Date RPD

RPD

Limits

Original

Result Units

Oils Laboratory

Ignitability Seta Flash GT200 degrees F 06/26/2008

Batch

Method

Instrument

FHV4987

SW1020A

Seta-Flash Flsh Pnt Tester
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:25

Batch

Method

Date Original

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Prep

9121 Red Hill BFSF

838157 Duplicate

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082865001

Parameter

QC

Result

Analysis

Date RPD

RPD

Limits

Original

Result Units

Oils Laboratory

Ignitability Seta Flash GT200 degrees F 06/26/2008

Batch

Method

Instrument

FHV4987

SW1020A

Seta-Flash Flsh Pnt Tester
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:25

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

837471 Lab Control Sample

837472 Lab Control Sample Duplicate

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

VXX18296

SW5035A

06/24/2008

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082865001, 1082865002

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Volatile Fuels Department

Benzene LCS 1360 109 ( 80-125 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

LCSD 1360 109 0 (< 20 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

Toluene LCS 1310 105 ( 85-120 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

LCSD 1320 106 1 (< 20 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

Ethylbenzene LCS 1330 106 ( 85-125 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

LCSD 1340 108 1 (< 20 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

o-Xylene LCS 1310 105 ( 85-125 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

LCSD 1320 106 1 (< 20 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

P & M -Xylene LCS 2760 110 ( 85-125 ) 2500 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

LCSD 2790 112 1 (< 20 ) 2500 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

Surrogates 

1,4-Difluorobenzene <surr> LCS 98 ( 85-110 ) 06/24/2008

LCSD 98 0 06/24/2008

Batch

Method

Instrument

VFC9022

SW8021B

HP 5890 Series II PID+HECD VBA
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:25

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

837473 Lab Control Sample

837474 Lab Control Sample Duplicate

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

VXX18296

SW5035A

06/24/2008

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082865001, 1082865002

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Volatile Fuels Department

Gasoline Range Organics LCS 11400 102 ( 75-115 ) 11300 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

LCSD 11000 98 4 (< 20 ) 11300 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

Surrogates 

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> LCS 96 ( 50-150 ) 06/24/2008

LCSD 99 3 06/24/2008

Batch

Method

Instrument

VFC9022

SW8015C

HP 5890 Series II PID+HECD VBA
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:25

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

837916 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

XXX19550

SW3550C

06/25/2008

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082865001

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

Diesel Range Organics LCS 133 80 ( 75-125 ) 166 mg/Kg 06/26/2008

Surrogates 

5a Androstane <surr> LCS 90 ( 60-120 ) 06/26/2008

Batch

Method

Instrument

XFC8010

SW8015C

HP 5890 Series II FID SV A R
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:25

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

838082 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Other Liquids

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082865001

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Oils Laboratory

Ignitability Seta Flash LCS 79.0 101 ( 98.5-101.5 ) 78 degrees F06/26/2008

Batch

Method

Instrument

FHV4987

SW1020A

Seta-Flash Flsh Pnt Tester
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:25

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

839061 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

XXX19571

SW3550C

07/01/2008

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082865001

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:25

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

839061 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

XXX19571

SW3550C

07/01/2008

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

Acenaphthylene LCS 15.6 71 ( 45-102 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

Acenaphthene LCS 15.4 70 ( 45-99 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

Fluorene LCS 16.1 73 ( 50-107 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

Phenanthrene LCS 17.8 81 ( 50-110 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

Anthracene LCS 12.9 59 ( 28-103 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

Fluoranthene LCS 19.4 88 ( 55-115 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

Pyrene LCS 18.5 84 ( 45-120 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

Benzo(a)Anthracene LCS 17.1 77 ( 40-110 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

Chrysene LCS 17.3 78 ( 55-110 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

Benzo[b]Fluoranthene LCS 16.3 74 ( 45-115 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

Benzo[k]fluoranthene LCS 15.8 72 ( 45-120 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

Benzo[a]pyrene LCS 8.01 36 ( 10-102 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene LCS 10.4 47 ( 40-120 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene LCS 10.3 47 ( 40-125 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene LCS 10.5 48 ( 40-118 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

Naphthalene LCS 15.2 69 ( 40-92 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

1-Methylnaphthalene LCS 14.9 67 ( 30-97 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

2-Methylnaphthalene LCS 14.8 67 ( 45-96 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

Surrogates 

Terphenyl-d14 <surr> LCS 90 ( 30-125 ) 07/15/2008
Matrix

SGS Ref.#

Client Name 

Project Name/#

Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:25

Batch

Method

Date

Prep

839061 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

9121 Red Hill BFSF

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

XXX19571

SW3550C

07/01/2008

Parameter

QC

Results

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

RPD Date

LCS/LCSD

Limits

RPD

Limits

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

Batch

Method

Instrument

XMS4613

8270D SIMS

HP 5890 Series II MS2 SVOA
Matrix

SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:25

Batch

Method

Date

Original

Prep

837477 Matrix Spike

837478 Matrix Spike Duplicate

1082739001

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

VXX18296

GRO Extraction (S)

06/24/2008

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082865001, 1082865002

Parameter

QC

Result

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

Date

MS/MSD

Limits RPD

RPD

Limits

Original

Result Qualifiers

Volatile Fuels Department

Benzene MS ND 1300 54* ( 80-125 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

MSD 1244 51* 4 (< 20 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

Toluene MS 49.2 J 3969 161* ( 85-120 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

MSD 3991 162* 1 (< 20 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

Ethylbenzene MS 296 985 27* ( 85-125 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

MSD 998 27* 1 (< 20 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

o-Xylene MS 1270 3565 88 ( 85-125 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

MSD 3655 92 2 (< 20 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

P & M -Xylene MS 2250 4675 44* ( 85-125 ) 4865 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

MSD 4742 46* 1 (< 20 ) 4865 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

Surrogates 

1,4-Difluorobenzene <surr> MS 2321 96 ( 85-110 ) 06/24/2008

MSD 2321 96 0 06/24/2008

Batch

Method

Instrument

VFC9022

SW8021B

HP 5890 Series II PID+HECD VBA
Matrix

SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:25

Batch

Method

Date

Original

Prep

837479 Matrix Spike

837480 Matrix Spike Duplicate

1082739001

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

VXX18296

GRO Extraction (S)

06/24/2008

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082865001, 1082865002

Parameter

QC

Result

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

Date

MS/MSD

Limits RPD

RPD

Limits

Original

Result Qualifiers

Volatile Fuels Department

Gasoline Range Organics MS 111000 152466 126* ( 75-115 ) 21861 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

MSD 155830 140* 2 (< 20 ) 21861 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

Surrogates 

4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> MS 14574 684* ( 50-150 ) 06/24/2008

MSD 14798 694* 2 06/24/2008

Batch

Method

Instrument

VFC9022

SW8015C

HP 5890 Series II PID+HECD VBA
Matrix

SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:25

Batch

Method

Date

Original

Prep

839062 Matrix Spike

839063 Matrix Spike Duplicate

1082633021

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

XXX19571

Sonication Extraction Soil 8270 PAH S

07/01/2008

QC results affect the following production samples:

1082865001

Parameter

QC

Result

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

Date

MS/MSD

Limits RPD

RPD

Limits

Original

Result Qualifiers

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS
Matrix

SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:25

Batch

Method

Date

Original

Prep

839062 Matrix Spike

839063 Matrix Spike Duplicate

1082633021

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

XXX19571

Sonication Extraction Soil 8270 PAH S

07/01/2008

Parameter

QC

Result

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

Date

MS/MSD

Limits RPD

RPD

Limits

Original

Result Qualifiers

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

Acenaphthylene MS ND 16.8 74 ( 45-102 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

MSD 17.1 75 2 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

Acenaphthene MS ND 16.3 72 ( 45-99 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

MSD 16.6 73 2 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

Fluorene MS ND 17.0 75 ( 50-107 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

MSD 17.5 77 3 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

Phenanthrene MS ND 17.6 78 ( 50-110 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

MSD 18.1 80 3 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

Anthracene MS ND 18.0 79 ( 28-103 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

MSD 18.5 81 3 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

Fluoranthene MS ND 18.8 83 ( 55-115 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

MSD 19.4 85 3 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

Pyrene MS ND 18.4 81 ( 45-120 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

MSD 18.9 83 3 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

Benzo(a)Anthracene MS ND 18.5 82 ( 40-110 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

MSD 19.1 83 2 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

Chrysene MS ND 17.6 77 ( 55-110 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

MSD 18.0 79 2 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

Benzo[b]Fluoranthene MS ND 18.0 80 ( 45-115 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

MSD 18.8 83 4 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

Benzo[k]fluoranthene MS ND 17.6 77 ( 45-120 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

MSD 17.4 77 1 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

Benzo[a]pyrene MS ND 17.0 75 ( 10-102 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

MSD 17.1 75 1 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene MS ND 13.0 57 ( 40-120 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

MSD 13.0 57 0 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene MS ND 12.9 57 ( 40-125 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

MSD 12.9 57 0 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene MS ND 13.4 59 ( 40-118 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

MSD 13.6 60 1 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

Naphthalene MS ND 15.3 67 ( 40-92 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

MSD 15.2 67 1 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

1-Methylnaphthalene MS ND 15.7 69 ( 30-97 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

MSD 16.0 70 2 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

2-Methylnaphthalene MS ND 15.2 67 ( 45-96 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

MSD 15.3 67 0 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008

Surrogates 

Terphenyl-d14 <surr> MS 18.9 83 ( 30-125 ) 07/16/2008

MSD 19.6 86 3 07/16/2008
Matrix

SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 07/21/2008 16:25

Batch

Method

Date

Original

Prep

839062 Matrix Spike

839063 Matrix Spike Duplicate

1082633021

Soil/Solid (dry weight)

XXX19571

Sonication Extraction Soil 8270 PAH S

07/01/2008

Parameter

QC

Result

Pct

Recov

Spiked

Amount 

Analysis

Date

MS/MSD

Limits RPD

RPD

Limits

Original

Result Qualifiers

Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

Batch

Method

Instrument

XMS4613

8270D SIMS

HP 5890 Series II MS2 SVOA