# CE2004078EN.01082401.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/824 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/824

---

(2004/C 78 E/0877)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3548/03

by Antonios Trakatellis (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(28 November 2003)

Subject:   Public works in Greece: shortcomings and defects regarding the Port of Igoumenitsa and the Egnatia highway

Subject:

Many projects receiving funding from the second and third Community support frameworks in Greece are characterised by major shortcomings and numerous defects. Aside from the risk to personal safety, inadequate planning, incomplete surveys and defective workmanship can also cause major geological and infrastructural damage. One example of this is the new Port of Igoumenitsa, recently inaugurated by the Prime Minister. Concerns are now being expressed in the Greek Parliament that this is a classic example of an engineering project being dogged by delays, overspending and failure to meet basic preconditions such as rainwater drainage. The same applies to the Egnatia highway project which is being affected by flooding, causing a build up of debris around bridges in Igoumenitsa, thereby obstructing the normal flow of the watercourse towards the sea. As a result, the heavy rains of 19 October 2003 caused extensive damage to the road network and to farmland in Thesprotia.

| 1. | What view does the Commission take of engineering methods in Greece and to what extent is it acceptable for Community funding to be provided for projects which are substandard in terms of planning, surveying and workmanship? |
| --- | --- |

1.

What view does the Commission take of engineering methods in Greece and to what extent is it acceptable for Community funding to be provided for projects which are substandard in terms of planning, surveying and workmanship?

| 2. | Who bears responsibility for inadequate planning, incomplete surveys and substandard workmanship and to what extent can the Community be considered contractually liable under the terms of Article 288 of the EC Treaty? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Who bears responsibility for inadequate planning, incomplete surveys and substandard workmanship and to what extent can the Community be considered contractually liable under the terms of Article 288 of the EC Treaty?

| 3. | Will the Commission request information from the special quality control adviser (ESPEL) concerning this particular case (Port of Igoumenitsa and Egnatia highway) and investigate the reasons for the shortcomings and defects which have occurred, and what measures will it take to avoid substandard workmanship on future projects? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Will the Commission request information from the special quality control adviser (ESPEL) concerning this particular case (Port of Igoumenitsa and Egnatia highway) and investigate the reasons for the shortcomings and defects which have occurred, and what measures will it take to avoid substandard workmanship on future projects?

| 4. | Is it possible to provide direct funding, in response to an application made through the appropriate channels, for the planning and implementation of a rainwater drainage project near the new Port of Igoumenitsa and for efforts to resolve problems arising in connection with the Egnatia highway project? |
| --- | --- |

4.

Is it possible to provide direct funding, in response to an application made through the appropriate channels, for the planning and implementation of a rainwater drainage project near the new Port of Igoumenitsa and for efforts to resolve problems arising in connection with the Egnatia highway project?

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(28 January 2004)

(28 January 2004)

The implementation of assistance, including designing, studying and constructing of Public Works, in accordance with Community law is the responsibility of the Member States. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the Greek authorities to ensure conformity with the legislation in force as well as to guarantee the quality of the construction work. The Community therefore has no contractual responsibility in this regard.

According to the information that the Commission has received from the Greek authorities, the works carried out in the New Port of Igoumenitsa bear no relation to the problems mentioned in the Honourable Member's question, because these works are geographically remote and unrelated to the rivers that caused the floods mentioned. According to the same authorities, the extreme weather conditions of 19 October 2003 caused the Lycopodi river to flow at more than double the maximum rate forecasted by the approved Technical studies of the Egnatia project, which was the sole reason for the overflow. The extent of damage to the Lykopodi river adjustments is currently being assessed.

---