Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Notices 44047 

effective June 1, 2010. Under 49 U.S.C. 

Section 47503 of the Aviation Safety 

and Noise Abatement Act (hereinafter 

referred to as ‘‘the Act’’), an airport 

operator may submit to the FAA noise 

exposure maps which meet applicable 

regulations and which depict noncompatible land uses as of the date of 

submission of such maps, a description 

of projected aircraft operations, and the 

ways in which such operations will 

affect such maps. The Act requires such 

maps to be developed in consultation 

with interested and affected parties in 

the local community, government 

agencies, and persons using the airport. 

An airport operator who has submitted 

noise exposure maps that are found by 

FAA to be in compliance with the 

requirements of Federal Aviation 

Regulations (FAR) Part 150, 

promulgated pursuant to the Act, may 

submit a noise compatibility program 

for FAA approval which sets forth the 

measures the operator has taken or 

proposes to take to reduce existing noncompatible uses and prevent the 

introduction of additional noncompatible uses. 

The FAA has completed its review of 

the noise exposure maps and 

accompanying documentation 

submitted by the City of Philadelphia 

Division of Aviation. The 

documentation that constitutes the 

‘‘Noise Exposure Maps’’ as defined in 

Section 150.7 of Part 150 includes the 

following from the PHL FAR Part 150 

Noise Exposure Map Update Report: 

• Figure 1: 2008 Existing Baseline 

Noise Exposure Map. 

• Figure 2: 2013 Future Baseline 

Noise Exposure Map. 

• Section 1: Appendix C, D and E— 

Consultation requirements. 

• Section 2: Land Use Analysis. 

• Section 3: 2008 Existing Baseline 

Noise Exposure Map and data 

requirements. 

• Table 3–1: 2008 Existing Baseline 

Annual Average Day Operations. 

• Table 3–3: 2008 Existing Baseline 

Runway Utilization. 

• Table 3–4: 2008 Flight Track 

Utilization. 

• Section 4: 2013 Future Baseline 

Noise Exposure Map and data 

requirements. 

• Table 4–1: 2013 Future Baseline 

Annual Average Day Operations. 

• Table 4–2: 2013 Future Baseline 

Runway Utilization. 

• Table 4–4: 2013 Flight Track 

Utilization. 

The FAA has determined that these 

noise exposure maps and accompanying 

documentation are in compliance with 

applicable requirements. This 

determination is effective on June 1, 

2010. FAA’s determination on an airport 

operator’s noise exposure maps is 

limited to a finding that the maps were 

developed in accordance with the 

procedures contained in Appendix A of 

FAR Part 150. Such determination does 

not constitute approval of the 

applicant’s data, information or plans, 

or a commitment to approve a noise 

compatibility program or to fund the 

implementation of that program. If 

questions arise concerning the precise 

relationship of specific properties to 

noise exposure contours depicted on a 

noise exposure map submitted under 

Section 47503 of the Act, it should be 

noted that the FAA is not involved in 

any way in determining the relative 

locations of specific properties with 

regard to the depicted noise contours, or 

in interpreting the noise exposure maps 

to resolve questions concerning, for 

example, which properties should be 

covered by the provisions of Section 

47506 of the Act. These functions are 

inseparable from the ultimate land use 

control and planning responsibilities of 

local government. These local 

responsibilities are not changed in any 

way under Part 150 or through FAA’s 

review of noise exposure maps. 

Therefore, the responsibility for the 

detailed overlaying of noise exposure 

contours onto the map depicting 

properties on the surface rests 

exclusively with the airport operator 

that submitted those maps, or with 

those public agencies and planning 

agencies with which consultation is 

required under section 47503 of the Act. 

The FAA has relied on the certification 

by the airport operator, under Section 

150.21 of FAR Part 150, that the 

statutorily required consultation has 

been accomplished. 

Copies of the full noise exposure map 

documentation and of the FAA’s 

evaluation of the maps are available for 

examination at the following locations: 

Federal Aviation Administration’s 

Harrisburg Airports District Office 

located at 3905 Hartzdale Drive, Suite 

508, Camp Hill, PA 17011, Monday– 

Friday 8 a.m.–4:30 p.m. 

Philadelphia International Airport’s 

Office of the Noise Abatement Program 

Manager (Jonathan D. Collette) located 

at 2801 Island Avenue, Suite 13, 

Philadelphia, PA 19153, Monday– 

Friday 8 a.m.–4 p.m. 

Questions may be directed to the 

individual named above under the 

heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. 

Issued in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, June 1, 

2010. 

Lori K. Pagnanelli, 

Manager, Harrisburg Airports District Office. 

[FR Doc. 2010–17979 Filed 7–26–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Notice of Passenger Facility Charge 

(PFC) Approvals and Disapprovals 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Monthly Notice of PFC 

Approvals and Disapprovals. In June 

2010, there were six applications 

approved. Additionally, eight approved 

amendments to previously approved 

applications are listed. 

SUMMARY: The FAA publishes a monthly 

notice, as appropriate, of PFC approvals 

and disapprovals under the provisions 

of the Aviation Safety and Capacity 

Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the 

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 

1990) (Pub. L. 101–508) and Part 158 of 

the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 

CFR Part 158). This notice is published 

pursuant to paragraph d of § 158.29. 

PFC Applications Approved 

Public Agency: County and City of 

Spokane, Washington. 

Application Number: 10–08–C–00– 

GEG. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. PFC LEVEL: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in This 

Decision: $850,000. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: August 

1, 2012. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

October 1, 2012. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To 

Collect PFC’s: None. 

Brief Description of Project Approved 

for Collection and Use: Master plan 

update. 

Decision Date: June 4, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Trang Tran, Seattle Airports District 

Office, (425) 227–1662. 

Public Agency: City of Presque Isle, 

Maine. 

Application Number: 10–02–C–00– 

PQI. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in This 

Decision: $353,298. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: August 

1, 2010. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

January 1, 2018. 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
44048 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Notices 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To 

Collect PFC’s: None. 

Brief Description of Project Approved 

for Collection and Use: 

Rehabilitate runway 1/19 and runway 

safety area, phase I. 

Snow removal equipment. 

Crack seal and repair. 

Rehabilitate, mark, and sign taxiway 

A. 

Rehabilitate runway 1/19 and runway, 

phase II. 

Decision Date: June 9, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Priscilla Scott, New England Regional 

Airports Division, (781) 238–7614. 

Public Agency: Charlottesville— 

Albemarle Airport Authority, 

Charlottesville, Virginia. 

Application Number: 10–19–C–00– 

CHO. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in This 

Decision: $3,454,340. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: August 

1,2010. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

August 1, 2016. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To 

Collect PFC’s: All air taxi/commercial 

operators filing or requested to file FAA 

Form 1800–31. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information submitted in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that the proposed class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at 

Charlottesville—Albemarle Airport. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use: 

Relocate runway 3 localizer. 

Pavement management program— 

rehabilitate taxiway F. 

Runway 21 extension—runway 

protection zone land acquisition. 

Runway 21 extension—phase 1A. 

Runway 21 extension—phase 1B, 

excavate embankment. 

Runway 21 extension—phase 1b, 

excavate embankment additional share. 

Runway 21 extension—phase 2, pave 

construct runway only. 

Pavement management program— 

mill/overlay taxiway sections. 

Runway 21 extension—phase 3, 

construction parallel taxiway. 

Runway 21 extension—phase 4a, 

runway safety area embankment. 

Rehabilitate electrical vault. 

Decision Date: June 9, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jeffery Breeden, Washington Airports 

District Office, (703) 661–1363. 

Public Agency: City of Albany, 

Georgia. 

Application Number: 10–05–C–00– 

ABY. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in This 

Decision: $323,763. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: August 

1,2010. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

February 1, 2013. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To 

Collect PFC’s: Air taxi/commercial 

operators. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information submitted in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that the proposed class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at Southwest 

Georgia Regional Airport. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use: 

Terminal rehabilitation and 

expansion. 

Airfield electrical improvements. 

PFC application development. 

Decision Date: June 14, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Anna Guss, Atlanta Airports District 

Office, (404) 305–7146. 

Public Agency: City of Atlanta, 

Georgia. 

Application Number: 10–12–C–00– 

Atl. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in This 

Decision: $19,332,000. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: January 

1, 2023. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

March 1, 2023. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To 

Collect PFC’s: Air taxi/commercial 

operators when enplaning revenue 

passengers in limited, irregular, special 

service air taxi/commercial operations 

such as air ambulance services, student 

instruction, and non-stop sightseeing 

flights that begin and end at the airport 

and are concluded within a 25-mile 

radius of the airport. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information submitted in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that the proposed class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at HartsfieldJackson Atlanta International Airport. 

Brief Description of Project Approved 

for Collection and Use: Concourse D 

gate additions. 

Decision Date: June 15, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Anna Guss, Atlanta Airports District 

Office, (404) 305–7146. 

Public Agency: County of Pitken, 

Aspen, Colorado. 

Application Number: 10–07–C–00– 

ASE. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in This 

Decision: $1,640,955. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: August 

1, 2010. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

August 1, 2012. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To 

Collect PFC’s: Non-scheduled on 

demand carriers, air taxi/commercial 

operators filing FAA Form 1800–31. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information submitted in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that the proposed class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at Aspen— 

Pitken County/Sardy Field. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use: 

Snow removal equipment—runway 

sweeper. 

Snow removal equipment—runway 

plow. 

Airfield friction tester. 

Snow removal equipment—airfield 

snow blower. 

PFC application and administration 

fees. 

Decision Date: June 18, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Chris Schaffer, Denver Airports District 

Office, (303) 342–1258. 

AMENDMENTS TO PFC APPROVALS

Amendment No. city, state 

Amendment 

approved 

date 

Original approved net PFC 

revenue 

Amended approved net PFC 

revenue 

Original estimated 

charge exp. 

date 

Amended 

estimated 

charge exp. 

date 

01–01–C–03–SAT San Antonio, TX ........................................ 05/28/10 $238,029,391 $364,227,049 01/01/13 05/01/19 

03–02–U–03–SAT San Antonio, TX ........................................ 05/28/10 NA NA 01/01/13 05/01/19 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Notices 44049 

AMENDMENTS TO PFC APPROVALS—Continued 

Amendment No. city, state 

Amendment 

approved 

date 

Original approved net PFC 

revenue 

Amended approved net PFC 

revenue 

Original estimated 

charge exp. 

date 

Amended 

estimated 

charge exp. 

date 

04–03–U–SAT San Antonio, TX. ............................................. 05/28/10 NA NA 01/01/13 05/01/19 

07–06–C–01–SUN Haily, ID .................................................... 06/02/10 691,368 763,226 11/01/10 12/01/10 

04–07–C–03–JNU Juneau, AK ................................................ 06/03/10 5,226,106 3,566,606 09/01/08 03/01/08 

07–07–C–01–ALO Waterloo, IA .............................................. 06/14/10 356,706 363,977 03/01/11 03/01/11 

09–14–C–01–MRY Monterey, CA ........................................... 06/21/10 854,823 980,026 08/01/10 12/01/10 

07–11–C–01–MCO Orlando, FL .............................................. 06/22/10 48,580,000 49,330,000 07/01/20 07/01/20 

Issued in Washington, DC on July 14, 2010. 

Joe Hebert, 

Manager, Financial Analysis and Passenger 

Facility Charge Branch. 

[FR Doc. 2010–17982 Filed 7–26–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Motor Carrier Safety 

Administration 

[FMCSA Docket No. FMCSA–2010–0138] 

Qualification of Drivers; Exemption 

Applications; Diabetes Mellitus 

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety 

Administration (FMCSA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of final disposition. 

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its 

decision to exempt twenty-five 

individuals from its rule prohibiting 

persons with insulin-treated diabetes 

mellitus (ITDM) from operating 

commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in 

interstate commerce. The exemptions 

will enable these individuals to operate 

CMVs in interstate commerce. 

DATES: The exemptions are effective July 

27, 2010. The exemptions expire on July 

27, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. 

Mary D. Gunnels, Director, Medical 

Programs, (202) 366–4001, 

fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA, Room 

W64–224, Department of 

Transportation, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 

5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Electronic Access 

You may see all the comments online 

through the Federal Document 

Management System (FDMS) at: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

Docket: For access to the docket to 

read background documents or 

comments, go to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and/or Room 

W12–140 on the ground level of the 

West Building, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 

9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. 

Privacy Act: Anyone may search the 

electronic form of all comments 

received into any of DOT’s dockets by 

the name of the individual submitting 

the comment (or of the person signing 

the comment, if submitted on behalf of 

an association, business, labor union, or 

other entity). You may review DOT’s 

Privacy Act Statement for the Federal 

Docket Management System published 

in the Federal Register on January 17, 

2008 (73 FR 3316), or you may visit 

http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/ 

E8-785.pdf. 

Background 

On June 16, 2010, FMCSA published 

a Notice of receipt of Federal diabetes 

exemption applications from twentyfive individuals and requested 

comments from the public (75 FR 

34206). The public comment period 

closed on July 16, 2010 and no 

comments were received. 

FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility 

of the twenty-five applicants and 

determined that granting the 

exemptions to these individuals would 

achieve a level of safety equivalent to, 

or greater than, the level that would be 

achieved by complying with the current 

regulation 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3). 

Diabetes Mellitus and Driving 

Experience of the Applicants 

The Agency established the current 

standard for diabetes in 1970 because 

several risk studies indicated that 

drivers with diabetes had a higher rate 

of crash involvement than the general 

population. The diabetes rule provides 

that ‘‘A person is physically qualified to 

drive a commercial motor vehicle if that 

person has no established medical 

history or clinical diagnosis of diabetes 

mellitus currently requiring insulin for 

control’’ (49 CFR 391.41(b)(3)). 

FMCSA established its diabetes 

exemption program, based on the 

Agency’s July 2000 study entitled ‘‘A 

Report to Congress on the Feasibility of 

a Program to Qualify Individuals with 

Insulin-Treated Diabetes Mellitus to 

Operate in Interstate Commerce as 

Directed by the Transportation Act for 

the 21st Century.’’ The report concluded 

that a safe and practicable protocol to 

allow some drivers with ITDM to 

operate CMVs is feasible. The 

September 3, 2003 (68 FR 52441) 

Federal Register Notice in conjunction 

with the November 8, 2005 (70 FR 

67777) Federal Register Notice provides 

the current protocol for allowing such 

drivers to operate CMVs in interstate 

commerce. 

These twenty-five applicants have 

had ITDM over a range of 1 to 30 years. 

These applicants report no 

hypoglycemic reaction that resulted in 

loss of consciousness or seizure, that 

required the assistance of another 

person, or resulted in impaired 

cognitive function without warning 

symptoms in the past 5 years (with one 

year of stability following any such 

episode). In each case, an 

endocrinologist verified that the driver 

has demonstrated a willingness to 

properly monitor and manage his/her 

diabetes mellitus, received education 

related to diabetes management, and is 

on a stable insulin regimen. These 

drivers report no other disqualifying 

conditions, including diabetes-related 

complications. Each meets the vision 

standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). 

The qualifications and medical 

condition of each applicant were stated 

and discussed in detail in the June 16, 

2010, Federal Register Notice and they 

will not be repeated in this Notice. 

Basis for Exemption Determination 

Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, 

FMCSA may grant an exemption from 

the diabetes standard in 49 CFR 

391.41(b)(3) if the exemption is likely to 

achieve an equivalent or greater level of 

safety than would be achieved without 

the exemption. The exemption allows 

the applicants to operate CMVs in 

interstate commerce. 

To evaluate the effect of these 

exemptions on safety, FMCSA 

considered medical reports about the 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES