alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 96-40596 Summary Calendar

_____________________
PATRICK MAC JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus MARSHALL HERKLOTZ, Southern Regional Director, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas USDC No. G-92-CV-483

_________________________________________________________________ January 15, 1998 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Patrick Mac J ackson, Texas inmate #478883, appeals the dismissal as frivolous of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Jackson’s motion for an evidentiary hearing before this court is
DENIED.
We have c arefully reviewed the record and the appellate arguments. For essentially the same reasons upon which the district court relied by ad opting the magistrate judge’s report,-2-

see Jackson v. Herklotz , No. G-92-483 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 1996), we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Jackson’s claims.
A F F I R M E D.
REF ID:A72358 

• • 

TO All Staff Divisions and 

Offices 

SUBJECT· Training Area at New Site 

.FROM TNG 13 Apr 54 

WR Rooney,60315,mbf 

FROM: s/ASS'I (Mr Wm F Friedan) 15 .A;prll 54 Comment 112 

l/Lt I T McDonald 

6o493/ca.n 

It ia no.t anticipated that this office will have aD1' requirements 

tor training fa.cJ.litiea at the new site 

I. T. McOONALD 

lat Lt , US Air Force 

Asat to s/ ASST 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 01-29-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

JIMMI TYLER REBISH,

Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,

Respondent.

______________________ 

2014-3085

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. SF-1221-13-0494-W-1. 

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

Jimmi Tyler Rebish moves for leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis. The Department of the Interior moves to 

recaption this matter to designate the Merit Systems 

Protection Board as the respondent.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board’s decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The 

employing agency is designated as the respondent when the 

Case: 14-3085 Document: 17 Page: 1 Filed: 09/03/2014
2 REBISH v. MSPB

Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. We 

determine that the Board should be designated as the 

respondent.

Accordingly, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 

is granted. 

(2) The motion to recaption is granted. The revised 

official caption is reflected above. 

(3) The Board’s informal brief is due within 21 days 

from the date of filing of this order. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Daniel E. O’Toole 

Clerk of Court

s24

Case: 14-3085 Document: 17 Page: 2 Filed: 09/03/2014
# CE2004084EN.01019401.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/194 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/194

---

(2004/C 84 E/0235)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0294/04

by Herman Vermeer (ELDR) to the Commission

(2 February 2004)

Subject:   Disclosure of the rate structure for the Central European Pipeline System

Subject:

Is the Commission aware of the existence of the Central European Pipeline System (CEPS)? The system was built up by the NATO allies between 1950 and 1989, during the Cold War, in order to transport fuel during wartime. This military infrastructure is now being used on a commercial basis to cover a proportion of the maintenance costs. The rates charged by NATO are anything but transparent for the system's various customers, however. Does the Commission believe that the CEPS' maintenance costs ought to be disclosed and linked to a transparent transport rating structure? In the final analysis, this system is offering a service on the European internal transport market, and its rivals would willingly take a look at the rates applied on the European transport market by what is a transport system funded by public monies. Would the Commission be willing to make arrangements with NATO's logistics arm in the near future in order to establish a transparent system of rates? I myself would advocate a system of annual reporting of the CEPS' maintenance costs, with a minimum and a maximum rate to cover as large a proportion of them as possible. In addition, not all routes within the system are equally commercially attractive. Are the maintenance costs for those routes also charged for, however?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(4 March 2004)

(4 March 2004)

The Commission is aware of the existence of the NATO Pipeline System (NPS). It consists of nine separate military storage and distribution systems for fuels and lubricants. The largest of these networks, the Central European Pipeline System (CEPS) covers Belgium, Germany, France, Luxemburg and the Netherlands. The system links storage deposits, air bases, civil airports, pumping stations and entry points. It is designed to ensure that NATO's requirements for petroleum products and their distribution can be met at all times. According to NATO figures, CEPS represents some 2 to 3 % of petroleum products transported in these Member States.

The system serves primarily military purposes but is open in part to commercial transactions as well. The tariffs are published as in France or negotiated on a case by case basis under the supervision of a committee where all members of the system are represented.

There is no specific Community legislation regarding tariffs and third party access to oil pipelines. The Commission does, therefore, not intend to enter into negotiations with NATO as an international organisation in order to establish such rules for this specific case.

---
# C_2004314EN.01000603.xml

| 18.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/6

---

Action brought on 27 October 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-448/04)

(2004/C 314/11)

An action against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 27 October 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by C. O'Reilly and A.-M. Rouchaud-Joët, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions which are necessary in order to comply with Council Directive 2001/40/EC of 28 May 2001 on the mutual recognition of decisions on the expulsion of third country nationals (1) or, in any event, by failing to inform the Commission of them, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions which are necessary in order to comply with Council Directive 2001/40/EC of 28 May 2001 on the mutual recognition of decisions on the expulsion of third country nationals (1) or, in any event, by failing to inform the Commission of them, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| 2. | order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposing the directive into national law expired on 2 December 2002.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 149 of 2.6.2001, p. 34.

1

---
Exhibit24.8

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appointseach of Robert K. Kretzman and Michael T. Sheehan or any of them, eachacting alone, her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with fullpower of substitution, for her and her name, place and stead, in anyand all capacities, in connection with the REVLON, INC. (the‘‘Corporation’’) Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December  31,  2005 (the‘‘Form 10-K’’) under the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limiting thegenerality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and onbehalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a directoror officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K andany instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or inconnection with the Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file thesame, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connectiontherewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities andExchange Commission and any applicable securities exchange orsecurities self-regulatory body, granting unto said attorneys-in-factand agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do andperform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be donein and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as shemight or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all thatsaid attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substituteor substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtuehereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed thesepresents this 1st day ofMarch, 2006.

|  | /s/ DEBRA L.LEE                                 DEBRAL. LEE |
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
## Williams , Rene e (OST) hod^4r ^ )^'T'OSf- /

1iT-X.f6 d From : Rogers , Kath y[Kathy.Rogers@slvrmc.org ] ~ ~ - r" j Sent : Saturday , Ma y22 , 201 0 6:2 1 P M To : 'EAS@dot.gov.' ; Devany , Denni s (OST) ; Wiliiams , Rene e (OST ) Subject : Essentia l Ai rServic e fo rAlamosa , Colorad o
Dea rMr

. D e Vany , A s th e Mayo rfo rth e Cit yof Alamosa , I wante d t o respon d t o you rlette rt o BarryShioshita , Manager , SL V Regiona l Airport , date d Ma y4 , 2010

. I understan d tha t Grea t Lake s Aviatio n wil l continu e servic e t o ou rarea . I a m please d o fthei rretur n an d hav e n o negativ e comment s regardin g thei rservice

. I woul d lik e t o ad d tha t man yconstituent s woul d appreciat e a n opportunit yfo rservic e fro m Alamos a t o th e Albuquerqu e Airport , i n additio n t o Denver

. Flight s ou t o f Albuquerqu e ar e ofte n les s expensiv e an d man ypeopl e fl yfro m tha t area . Tha t said , w e ar e gratefu l fo rth e servic e w e hav e t o Denve ran d certainl ywan t t o than k yo u fo rallowin g th e continuatio n o f tha t servic e fo rou rValle yresidents ! Pleas e don' t hesitat e t o ge t i n contac t i f yo u hav e question s o rconcerns . Thank s s o much ! Kathlee n Roger s Mayor , Cit yo f Alamos a Kathlee nRoger s VP , Developmen t SL V Regiona l Medica l Cente r (719)587-120 9
**Exhibit 99.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form F-3 (File Nos.333-14102, 333-91034, 333-99073 and 333-126120) of SK Telecom Co., Ltd. of our report dated May 19,2006, which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to achange in accounting principle for income taxes to conform to Statement of Korean AccountingStandards No. 16, relating to the consolidated financial statements appearing in the annual reporton Form 20-F of SK Telecom Co., Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2005 and to the reference tous under the heading “Experts” in the Prospectus, which is part of these Registration Statements./s/ Deloitte Anjin LLCSeoul, Republic of Korea
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Richard A. Packer, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of ZOLL Medical Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: December 23, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 38 (Thursday, February 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 10475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03998]



[[Page 10475]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 7590-010]


Nashua Hydro Associates, City of Nashua, New Hampshire; Notice of 
Transfer of Exemption

    1. By letter filed January 23, 2015, the City of Nashua, New 
Hampshire informed the Commission that the exemption from licensing for 
the Jackson Mills Project, FERC No. 7590, originally issued April 24, 
1984,\1\ has been transferred from Nashua Hydro Associates to the City 
of Nashua, New Hampshire. The project is located on the Nashua River in 
Hillsborough County, New Hampshire. The transfer of an exemption does 
not require Commission approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 27 FERC ] 62,078, Order Granting Exemption From Licensing of 
a Small Hydroelectric Project of 5 Megawatts or Less.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. The City of Nashua, New Hampshire is now the exemptee for the 
Jackson Mills Project, FERC No. 7590. All correspondence should be 
forwarded to: Ms. Sarah Marchant, Division Director, City of Nashua, 
New Hampshire, Community Development Division, 229 Main Street, Nashua, 
New Hampshire 03060.

    Dated: February 19, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-03998 Filed 2-25-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
./I 

.. 

usom: 29.18/17 

TQP SfiRm 

TOPJtfRfjf A6 O 4 g.a 

• 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

16 August 1954 

MEMORANDUM FOR TRE MEMBERS OF USOIB: 

24 

Subject: Preparation of Terms of Reference for OOMINT Arrangements 

withl I 

References: (a) USCIB 29.18/16 of 29 July. 195·4·· ..• 

(b) USCIB 29.18/8 of 9 June 1954. 

1. In approving the enclosure with rei'erenee (a) at its 105th 

Meeting on 1.3 August 1954, USCIB agreed that an Ad Hoc Oommi:ttee be 

established for the purpose Qf drawing up ~· ·. ref erenoe for 

negotiating a new oaaNT relationship with • It was understood 

that the Committee would be composed of represen atives of all Members 

of USCID except CBD and FBI wh~.would also 'be free to participate if the 

need should arise. It was further agreed that the NSA Member of the Ad 

Hoc Committee would serve as· Ohiμ.rman of it •. 

2. The members of the above mentioned committee have been 

designated as follows: 

Name 

Col. John J. Davis, USA (Chairman) 

OGA 

. Col. John P. Ka:ylor 

Major William s. J. Curley 

Cdr. John L. Holmes . Mr. Robert F. Packard (tentative) 

4ctitj.ty 

NSA 

CIA 

ARMY 

.A:rn Fm.CE 

NAVY 

STATE 

3. For basic guidance in their deliberations the attention of 

the Chairman and ~!embers of the above described Ad Hoo Committee is 

inv:l.ted to·paragr, 15 of: enclosure with reference (a) (The Report of the UKUSA D and to paragraph 3 of · enclosure 4 with re erenoe • 

usom: 29.18/17 

eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 

TOP SECRET 0-21-2014 ursuantto E .0. 13526 
.r 

ro~J;Q.;A604oa :Z U.IJV.1.1..1..J.I. e 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

USCIB: 29.18/17 

f Ql' Sli!9tlljft' 

Subject: Pre~rati on cl Terms of Reference for CCMINT Arrangements with.__! __ r 

-~---------------------~--~-~--~--~--

4. It is requested that the.report of the above mentioned Ad Hoo 

Committee be forwarded to the Executive Secretariat in forty copies 

prior to the close of business on Friday, 3 September 1954 if it is to 

be in good time for consideratior.: at the next regular meeting of USCIB. 

5. THIS DOCUMENT COOTAINS CCMMONICATIOO'S INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION 

AND SHALL HANDLED <liLY IN CHANNELS EXPRESSLY PROVIDED FOR CCMINT. 

aP, ain,, • • Navy 

c ive Secretary,, USCIB 

Copy to: 

Col. John Davis, USA (6) 

USCIB: 29.18/17 

. TO-P SHOR-Ef'
**Exhibit 32.2**
**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
I, Michael J. McCann, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. (the“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section1350, that:
 1.  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and  2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for theperiod covered by such Report.
Dated: May 6, 2005         By:                   /s/ Michael J. McCann    Michael J. McCann         Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Mack V. Traynor, III, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of HEI, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.                                                              /s/ Mack V. Traynor, III   Mack V. Traynor, III   Chief Executive Officer and President   
Date: July 12, 2005
25