NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 • 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

,1::,/, FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 

) 

27 October 1966 

BYE-60511-66 

T:01? SECRET 

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. FLAX, DIRECTOR NRO 

SUBJECT: Electromagnetic Pointing System for MOL 

1. Reference NRO Memorandum, subject as above, dated 

1 September 1966, BYE-21208-66. NSA is pleased to have 

had the opportunity to study in some detail the various 

aspects of the proposed MOL ELINT sub-system provided in 

trle reference and augmented via briefings, informal disc-.,ssions and additional documentation. The results of our 

study are attached as Inclosure I. 

2. Our analysis indicates that the bi-sensor approach 

has a unique potential for high priority intelligence 

cdflection and that addition of an automatic ELINT 

_.vs-aem in the MOL platform is definitely desirable. I am 

convinced that the very small percentage increase in the 

ov: tali MOL program cost required for the ELINT system 

wil: result in a significantly larger percentage increase 

in she relative value of the overall program output, and 

c, Before, makes economic sense. 

3. It should be noted, however, that our evaluation 

inc..icates that the primary value of the ELINT sub-system is 

precise emitter location in which the man need play no role. 

A _econdary advantage is the real-time correlation with 

the photo sensor. The capability required for this function 

is to determine if a target in a selected photographic 

fLzIld of view is, in fact, emitting. The value of the 

system is not considered to be as an acquisition aid for 

the photo sensor. These considerations may be a significant 

factor in the system design. 

4. If the opportunity exists or arises for transfer 

of MOL resources to the SIGINT Satellite Program or if 

Copy/ of - Copies 

Page/ of.3 Pages. 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 11ULY 2015 

T CECaET BYE-60511-66 

serious interference with the SIGINT Satellite Program 

occurs, I present the following considerations. The 

limited lifetime and the inherently higher costs associated with a manned program, and the subordinate role 

SIGINT must inevitably play in the MOL mission argue 

that the resources for the ELINT sub-system might produce 

more SIGINT results if applied to systems not associated 

with MOL operations. It is my conclusion that the MOL 

mission does not represent the best means for increasing 

the overall SIGINT satellite pay-off. 

5. Specifically, I believe that it is more urgent to 

provides a system 

capable oz routinely providing the location accuracies 

proposed for MOL; 

d. Explore the potential advantages offered by 

effective, wideband, real-time spacecraft-to-ground 

communications, command and control. The present day 

practicality of a synchronous communications satellite 

relay makes it possible to consider extending all the 

ma:.i,ed functional capability in the spacecraft to a 

cL..:o.,.nd console. This would provide a means of making 

best personnel resources available for SIGINT related 

Copy/ of Copies 

Page 0 of . Pages. 

Pcr4, 

L'.):;' - ,1 '• 1",r1 

L.1,11 

PIPM1r1 iodiUti; • 
NRO APPROVER FOR 

RELEAE • 1 JULY 2015 

CECaET BYE-60511-66 

judgments without requiring that they be in space. 

6. I am pleased to note that most of these points 

aye addressed in your Advanced Development Program. I 

look forward to a continued close working relationship 

between our staffs to assure the satisfactory achievement 

of these objectives. 

S Car.te.r-- 

MARSHALL S. CARTER 

Lieutenant General, U. S. Army 

Director 

a/s 

Copy/ of ..,ai.Copies 

Page _q of 3 Pages. 

' 

'''r7,77:11N1 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

BYE-60511-66 

:S'LJECT: Evaluation of Proposed ELINT Sub-System for Bi-Sensor 

Collection. Program 

1. In order to arrive at an evaluation of the anticipated benefits 

of the proposed hi-sensor collection program and its possible advantages 

over existing uncoordinated SIC= and photographic systems,it is first 

necessary to review existing and planned satellite capabilities as they 

apply to target rations, electronics state-of-the-art, deployment levels 

and patterns, and development/test activity. 

CU=NT/FUTURE SIG= SATELLITE COLLECTION: 

2. Current SIG= Satellite Programs are capable of providing the 

following types of intelligence information: 

a. broad spectrum ELINT general search for environmental and 

technici data. The main objective in this area is to provide sufficient 

technical detail and location information on new and/or unusual electronic 

signals to allow a determination of their significance as the basis for 

farther collection action. Existing satellite collection systems, while 

providing some technical data, generally do not permit adequate determination 

sigLL1 source(s) for correlation with photography. 

Letalied technical data co ,earning identified specific emitters 

types which are of high priority interest to the intelligence 

ziuritt. It is usually necessary to devise complex payloads which are 

designed to collect against individual emitters or classes of 

'.tters. This requires a certain degree of "a priori" knowledge (derived 

ELI= general search missions, photo interpretation, or connunity 

:::cul:_tion) regarding both basic signal characteristics and emitter locations,. 

lentation, and configuration. 

c. ELINT Order of Battle (ICE) to accuracies of approximately 

Accuracy of emitter locations depends upon the specific 

location technique employed; and, again, "a priori" knowledge of target 

emitter characteristics is required if optimized techniques to derive 

precise locations are to be employed while assuring that the target signal 

can be isolated from other similar signals. 

3. The present trend in SIGINT Satellite, collection is toward 

„eater location accuracy and improved technical intelligence capabilities. 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN-17.1.1.:Tf-ICET-!:nE. 

CONTROL SYSTEMS JOINTLY 

Page 1 of 7 pages 

1.1 

/ 
7,7:1 

Nk0.4■PPROVLD. FOR - - Z4YE-C.0511-66 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

E-':7/772= PhOTO SnTELLITE COLLECTION: 

). Presently, satellite photography can contribute information 

;arding electronics insofar as determining (a). precise site/complex locations, 

emitter orientation, and (c) emitter identification. Present photographic 

:a-olution capabilities offer a good opportunity' of detecting radar complexes/ . 

',2,02 Sc; however, accurate identification of specific pieces of equip-- 

t therein is often impossible unlesS conditions (i.e., satellite position 

. ground site location geometry and light conditions) are optimal. Some 

the larger Soviet radars (e.g. TALL KING, HEN HOUSE) however, can easily 

be idc tified from KEYHOLE photography. 

5. =HOLE photographic systems presently in operation include the 

and KH-8. The KH-4 has a 10-foot resolution and a field of 

of approximately' 160 by 15 NM per frame and continuous fr::_mes. This 

"tem is utilized for reconnaissance. The KH-7 1-is a 3-foot resolution 

and a field of view cross-track of approximately.12 YM. In-track field of 

view, .--nen used for stereo, is approximalely 30 NM. In-track field of view, 

when used for mono, is unlimited. The KII-7 was the first satellite system 

tilized for "spotting" or detailed analysis. The NM-8 is an outgrowth of 

NE-7 and has a design resolution capability of with a field 

of vleT.,approximately half of the KH-7. Two missions have been flown to 

the best resolution achieved has been Systems to be 

_:. plo-yed in the near future will not have significant resolution increases 

un will provide larger film storage capacity- for a greater increase in 

"_jet coverage. Another modification under development is a faster retrieval 

ctLlizing a number of film casettes to be de-orbited periodically. The present 

otogrphic systems are 1)fap - -1-0,7:ammed for target selection with a few 

_..- _erations possible when satellite weather information is employed. The 

is :,o-rmally 65% cloud covered as low pressure systems advance across 

-e lane_ . .ass. A considerable amount of film is wasted due to cloudeoverea targets which are preorogrammed for film exposure. 

RANDL.E VIA 

BYEMAN-TALENT-1(E':.!OLE 

CONTROL SYSTEMS JOINTLY 

Page 2 of 7 pages 
r P- 7 7111 

NR1 APPROVED FOR `,...a.14S-6053.1-66 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

' INTELLIGENCE REQUIREM=S:' 

6. In order to assess the potential value of the proposed bi-sensor 

a review has been made of the existing Specific Intelligence' 

Collection Requirements '(SICRs) which represent current needs for ELITE' 

data by the Intelligence ComMunity, There are four 'general areas in 

which reciuirements exist which are considered to be of high overall ' 

priority, which are 'not being adequately satisfied. at the present time 

by conventional or special collection methods, and for which. information 

arc likely to, exist for the 'foreseeable future. These general areas 

Requirerrients, Surface-toSurface Missile and Space'ReqUirements,' 

'cc-to-Air Missile Requirements, and Unidentified and Developmental 

Requirements. The.following quotation from a 29 September 1966 

:_,:..cranium from The Guided Missile and Astronautics Intelligence Committee 

tne Chairman, Critical Collection Priorities Committee is illustrative 

of the present difficulties being encountered in these areas. This quotation 

rerles specifically to AL:'; collection requirements: 

"One of the most critical gaps in Soviet missile defense 

and space intelligence is still between project definition . 

and the on-set of a development testing program. Little 

evidence on the Soviet REM Rap program is detected prior to 

initiation of construction of test facilities on the actual 

flight test program. 'While construction of new facilities 

has alerted us to new programs, we have been unable to develop 

the system characteristics without substantiation by other 

evidence. A second major gap is our inability to derive • • 

system characteristics during the test phase because of the 

:lmost total lack of ELI= from the test center. This gap 

is so serious that we are presently unable to determine the 

purpose of a defensive system that has been under development 

for several years and is now being deployed". 

7. contractor study performed recently for NSA presents a listing 

• LIIGI1:2 gaps based on photographic evidence of an installation or 

for which no correlation of signal to installation has been 

aible. There are twenty-three types of located,facilities (representing 

251 individual locations) in this listing most of which relate to one or 

of tae priority SICR areas categorized above (RED TAG Reports No. 4, 

-=-G326, dated 17 August 1966 refers.) The listing is attached as 

endix I. 

G. Additionally, there are currently a number of potentially 

yrifint unidentified or developmental signals (collected primarily 

satellites) which require further. definition from the standpoint of 

te:;hnical characteristics, location, and association with physical equipment 

V1W 

GYEMAN-TALr':!.T-KE.YHOLE 

CONTROL 1:,-15.77EIVIS JOINTLY Page 3 of Z pages 

• 
- • . 

NRO APPROVEQFOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

or system,J in order to determine their intelligence significance. A 

review ha e been conducted of satellite intercept records and all notated 

signal continuities which have not as yet been equated to emitter•hardware in order to determine to what extent the ELINT analysis and identification 

problem could benefit by a simultaneously collected photography product. 

The majority- of valid, unidentified signal intercepts from. ,satllite col-• 

lction aissions wore discovered to be one time intercepts; however, one 

72 signal (02 intercepts) , one S-band (20 intercepts), and one .Xband 

irterce (30 intercepts). stood out as exceptions to this general rule. 

In addition, a review of those notated signals which have not been equated 

to specific source hardware but ..;:hich have been intercepted by satellite 

misions revealed few high priori:,y signals which could be expected to result 

successful si;;-nal intercept and photo collection correlation. Signals 

11 as which are ,seen frequently by satellite 

aad as frequently (if not more frequently) by conventional collection 

coerces, but which could be expected to be radome enclosed, were excluded 

feem consideration. Seven notated .signals presently unequated to hardware 

listed in _appendix II, together with those previously referenced unhtified signals, which could constitute priority' signal/photo correlation' 

,.;ets from tne ELINT viewpoint. 

:-ATIO- 3 EN =NT COLLECTION: 

9. It is anticipated that conventional satellite and other collection 

ans, which are constantly being improved, will continue to assist 

ailing existing and future intelligence gaps. However, in the area 

a -Primary reason that gaps exist derives in large measure from 

ii. -itations in current collection systems, especially their inability to 

,:eate eissions accurately and to define precisely their technical 

.•aacteristics. These limitations apply especially in the area of emit-

.- employing a Continuous Wave (C) node of operation. It is noteworthy 

mah,:- - of the target emitters determined from photography are postulated 

,e employ- cu techniques. Similarly, most photographic analysis of SIGINT 

;-...:;_:,term at present leads to an "unidentified" category because of restrictions 

resolution which prevent viewing the reflectors and feeds in toto. Even 

ah increase in imagery resolution will not provide all the essentials for 

adequate appraisal because of tne geometry of satellite collection (e.g., 

a top or sharply oblique view is all that is obtainable from the 

mera lens). Other restrictions include the problems in photographic 

_heerpretation posed by the use of radomes and enclosed scanners as well. 

as such uncontrollable factors as weather and sun angle. 

10. .:1101-. photography is available for appraisal, only a portion of 

radiation characteristics can be postulated. Much of the present 

PAN7DL:: PA 

BYEIVIA .."-:(1=-'. OLE 

CONTROL JC6041LY 

Page It of 7 pages 

Li 
NRO•ARPR6/ED, FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

" 7.•• 

;4;4 .;..;;; ....;;;;4 

Ldnt-Lf-Lcation is by site and/or support .association due to 

a leck of imae, quality necessary for detailed visual observation of the. 

em1::,ter. ;ssam:rytions are then made that emitters, at similar -sites and 

ioa similar support components, are also similar. Presently, available 

11. .i:t has often been the case that utilization of-data collected "

by single sensor loads to ambiguous concluebns. One example is the 

(flrgence of opinions on the present Soviet ability to wage anti-ballistic 

,a-rfare and the concept of operations for the Tallinn-type missile 

facilities. The source of the continued discussion on this sub-. • 

is the fact that data collected by only one sensor, KEYHOLE photography,. 

l_LL been utilized for analysis of the Tallinn-type facilities. Although . 

has provided valuable -information on deployment and intersite 

cer:ponente, no precise definition of system -capabilities has been possible 

because of the lack of correlatable ELL-T- data. • 

7=E.TTOH 07 '2;:LOPOSED BI-sEsoa 31-ST.L.13: 

12. The proposed bi-sensor system offers a capability (both ELINT and 

2._:C20) not planned for other satellite platforms in the next five years. 

an El= standpoint, neither emitter location accuracy of approximately 

:,rogrL,mmed satellite collection equipment. The PHOTO portion of the bi- -

se:leor system has a design resolution of and a field of view of 

1.25 IL et -perigee. In the manned version, an acquisition or target finder 

telescope will be utilized for assistance in target selection. Cloud covered 

targets sill be rejected resulting in selective coverage. Since this system 

has a s* iii:-her resolution. many. components such as 

should be 

r:,eolvaele provided that light conditions and target perspective are optimized. 

Tilese components cannot be in any event adequately analyzed from existing 

photographic systems. In addition to these apparently unique :LINT and 

:?elOTO colbction capabilities, the potential for concurrently acquiring 

le= and photographic information from a given geographic area is signi2-Leant from the standpoint of intelligence value. Post facto correlation 

of previously located signal intercepts with photographic data which was 

separately collected has the Lzherent difficulty of compounding the errors 

elftant in location of the satellite collection sources, a problem which is 

obviated 7.1hen simultaneous collection by both sensors from a common base 

is accomplished. 

HANDLE VIA 

AN-TALENT-KEYHOLE 

NTROL SYSTEMS JOINTLY 

Page 5 of 7 pages 
NRQAPPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

13. The ability. to perform pre-programmed seercn of the freqeency 

In areas where facilities of interest have been identified by 

eiouJ ,photogr.lphy and to derive detailed technical intelligence and 

;ely eceurate location information is. attractive. In addition, 

_e_1:1 fee aed acquisition of special signals of interest whose known 

_eracte-eisties can be stcred In the computer memory is Of potential value. 

Although the above examcoles primarily address the value of the ELIaIi. subtem as a SCID2LtA: entity, there is also benefit that can be derived 

sfeeelt.ecoue ELINT/20TO collection. Ide ally, information on'develope •;:ee:on s:stem snould be acgi:iood a:; oarly no po3:31:1)Th thQ 

to ,',110-;: fee of .::,)[,0;A 

sLre,,e,Lo planning. Specifically, the areas in which such Soviet 

__.e•../S.Ale development have occurred are at nary She bail and Kapustin Yar. 

The.testing areas of these locations have been identified in Photography 

as being positioned in such proximity that even a 

location capability will not, in most cases, allow positive correlation 

an gLINT intercept with photographed equipment configurations. In these 

e-tanees, which most certainly represent high priority targets from a 

-eeleional standpoint, simultaneous ELINT and P1,0TO collection could allow 5

:oiguous identification of the emitting source. This could be ace_ -1.1is-eed by providing reasonable definitive ELDT locations together 

the photography which would indicate ground activity at a specific 

tee ; location. 

15. :lthoegh the intelligence value of accurately located and defined 

high priority target signals (e.g., ABN/SAM-associated emitters) is readily 

apparent, an evaluation of the proposed ELINT sub-system• must consider some 

ecljitional pertinent factors: 

a. The effectiveness of the system must be examined in terms 

of its probability of intercepting the signals of highest interest. Based 

on e thirty day platform lifetime, an altitude of approximately 80 nautical 

atlas, and an effective swath width of 120 nautical miles it is estimated 

_et the system will cover most areas of the Sino-Soviet Bloc no more • 

times. In consideration of these factors, the duty cycle of any given 

emitter must approach 25% in order to assure a mathematical 95% probability 

of intercept. Figures recently developed 'cxy- the NRO indicate that nearly 

"looks" at any given area would be required to provide a 95% probability • 

of intercept for an emitter with a duty cycle of 1%,. To achieve a M 

,.4.4att 

Page 6 of 7 pages 

• 
. . 

NRO AePROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JUi!Y 2015 BYE-60511-66 

- 

probaby of intercept for an emitter with a 3% duty cycle, about 

"lochs" ne.1,.dad. Since a radar undergoing research and development 

p20bLbly bc; located at o.:ay one place and will probably be active 

percel.ta,2e of the time, the probability of successful acquisition 

L,;• the 72oposed E=. sub-system is very limited. The probability of 

saccessf=y acquiring a given target with the ELINT and photographic sensors. 

..;:_ultL.:,eously is smaller yet when defined in terms of obtaining cloud- ' 

free, high-quality imagery. 

b. 2,d.ditionally, from a technical standpoint, the utility of a 

25 MC oscilloscope recording capability which requires rapid manual reaction 

on the part of the astronaut may be an unwarranted facet of the system. 

The ability of a non-signal analyst to make high quality photographs for 

bseql_lant analysis is questionable, and in fact the 25 MC capability its3lf 

be an unnecessary. luxury. From a signal analytic standpoint, a high 

cality 1 to 5 MC pre-detection recording to be used as an input to groundL.;lysis should be sufficient to satisfy technical intelligence requirements 

.:.r.:ept in the case of frequency jumping or frequency diversity emitters 

.ch could require capabilities far in excess of 25 MC. In these instances, 

. on the order of 100 MC would be necessary. 

16. s a result of the above study, it has been concluded that despite 

te inherent problem of low probability of intercept on a given low duty 

cycle eritter, the potential intelligence value to be derived from inclusion 

of an :LINT sub-system on-board the MOL is sufficiently high to justify. • 

fi=ther consideration of including such a capability. 

17. There may be some system specifications, such as the 25 MC 

oscillozraph photographic capability, which could be relaxed and thus 

affect reduced cost and complexity, higher reliability or both. 

HAN= 'JA 

OYEVIAN-TnL.1:7-= 7 -L.T..7. 

CONTROL SYS MO 3 ; N TLY 

Tr)(5,77 ..:777-7 2age 7 of 2 Pages 
( • 

NRCi APPO,NELLEOR_ 

RELEASE 1 .1 tV*015 • 

LiJ 

APPENDIX I 

The following list contains 201 photo derived locations in the 

USSR and China for which few or no signals have been intercepted. 

Details available from photo sources concerning these facilities are 

described in Red Tag Report No. 4, EDL-G326, dated 17 August 1966. 

1. HEN ROOST 

Previously at radar site No. 2, SSATC. Has been dismantled 

and may be relocated. 

2. HEN HOUSE 

Radar site no. 1, SSATC. 

3. DOG HOUSE 

Moscow 

4. DUAL HEN HOUSE 

a. Site no. 13, SSATC. 

o. Angarsk 

c. Olenegorsk 

a. Skrunda 

5. HOUSE ADDITION 

Radar site no. 1, SSATC 

6. DUPE RADAR 

a. Simferopol 

b. Moscow 

c. Yeniseysk 

d. Tyura Tam 

a. Ulan Ude 

firpOlic11%.1. 

Page / ertfi as 

t!...21 L.. • 

/ 
NRO 

r r 

RELEASE 1 JUL &15- 

1. Sary Shagan 

g. Golenki 

h. Khutor 

7. SS-6 GUIDANCE ELECTRONICS 

a. Launch Area A, TTMTC 

b. Launch Area B, TTMTC 

c. Launch Area 1, Plesetsk 

d. Launch Area 2, Plesetsk 

e. Launch Area 3, Plesetsk 

S. ODD BALL 

Instrumentation Site No. 6, SSATC 

9. RADAR 931, 

a. Instrumentation Site No. 14, SSATC 

b. Instrumentation Site No. 15, SSATC 

c. Instrumentation Site No. 16, SSATC 

Instrumentation Site No. 17, SSATC 

e. Instrumentation Site No. 1 (POSS.), SSATC 

10. HEN EGG 

a. Instrumentation Site No. 3, SSATC 

b. Instrumentation Site No. 6, SSATC 

c. Instrumentation Site No. 10,HSSATC 

d. tL (KAMCHATKA) 

11. C.TJEER. SCAN (Unofficial Title) 

a. Tallinn 

b. Cherepovets. 

c. Liepaja 

Appendix I 

Page 2 of 10 pages 
NRQ-APPROVE pf.OR - "7, 77-'s; „.0 

RELEASE i J 

BYE-60511-66 

a. Leningrad NV 

e. Leningrad NE 

. Leningrad SW 

g. Launch Complex "A" SSATC 

A. Nizhnaya - Salda 

i. Sverdlovsk 

Nizhnyaya - Tura 

k. Launch Complex 1, SSATC 

1. Launch Complex 2, SSATC 

m. Murashi 

n. Nizhniy - Tagil 

o. Kalinin 

p. Babayevo 

Kimry 

r. Feodoysia 

s. Volgograd 

t. SO Area Izival3. 

u. Gorkiy Radar Test Area 

v. Leningrad Training Complex 

12. L3M TRIADS 

a. Launch Complex "B", SSATC 

b. Instrumentation Site No. 2, SSATC 

c. Instrumentation Site No. 10, SSATC 

d. Instrumentation Site No. 13,. SSATC 

Appendix I 

Page 3 of 10 pages 
NRC/.4PRO\/LE3FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

B B.;-30511-66 77" 

e. SAN Site E05-1; Moscow 

f. SAM Site E15-1, Moscow 

g. SAM Site E24-1, Moscow 

h. SAM Site E31-1, Moscow 

i. SAM Site E33-1, Moscow 

j.. SAM Site E03-1, Moscow 

k. SAM Site E21-11Moscow 

13. SATELLITE DOPPLER TRACKING EQUIPMENT 

a. Khutor 

b. Golenki 

c. Simferopol (PROB) 

d. Moscow (PROB) 

e., Yeniseysk (PROB) 

f. Ulan,Ude (PROB) 

g. Sary Shagan (PROD) 

Tyura Tam (PROB) 

14..17:DAR st4.0 

a. Launch Complex °A" TTMTR 

b. =13, TTNTR 

c. Cw7C, TTNTR 

d. C0813, TTNTR 

e. CO8C, TTMTR 

C0913, TTMTR 

g. CO9C, TTMTR 

h. C5113/C5413, Kamchatka Appendix I 

Page l of 10 pages 

r Fse 

:1 • 

111:.J 
N13191,APPkNEDFOR 

RELEA CII5 

C51E, Kamchatka 

C51D, Kamchatka 

k. Main Instrumentation Site, KYMTR 

i. Launch Complex "D", KYMTR 

m. Lake Elton, KYMTR 

n. Verkniy Baskunchak, KYMTR 

o. Novaya KazankalKYMTR 

p. Makat, KYI.ER 

q. Ten Locations, SCTETR 

Instrumentation Site No. 2, Ehmba 

s. Instrumentation Site No. 6, Ehmba 

instrumentation Site No. 7, Ehmba 

u. Instrumentation Site No. 8, Ehmba 

v. Instrumentation Site No. 9, Ehmba 

w. Instrumentation Site No. 4, SSATC 

x. Instrumentation Site No. 5, SSATC 

y. Instrumentation Site No. 6, SSATC 

z.. Instrumentation Site No. 7,SSATC 

ac.. Instrumentation Site No. 8, SSATC 

bb. Instrumentation Site No. 9, SSATC 

cc. Instrumentation Site No. 11, SSATC 

dd. Instrumentation Site No. 12, SSATC 

15. h-SHAPED RADAR TRACKING FACILITIES 

a. G-1, KYMTR 

b. G-2, KYMTR 

.4 

Appendix I 

Page 5 of 10 pages 

, 
1\140:APPR6VED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

e ■ ' 

177:7'..7° 

d 

c. Elton, KYMTR 

Gornyy Balykley, KYMTR 

e. Pallasovka, KYMTR 

2. Kamyshin, KYMTR 

Aleksandrov Gay, KYMTR 

h. Site 10, KYMTR 

i. Site 11, KYMTR 

j. Elisenvara 

k. Gdov 

Johvi 

Kerstovo 

n. Narva 

o. Priozersk 

p. Salmi 

g. Storozhno 

r. Tihkvin 

s. Tolmnchevo 

t. Veskitaguse 

u. Vyborg 

16. '3_2R CAN 

a. Launch Complex 4A0, SSATC 

b. SAM Area, KYMTR 

c. Cherepovets 

d. Verkhnyaya - Salda 

e. Kursk (Suspect) ----Appendix I 

- ' Page 6 of 10 pages 
NRQAPPROVEDFOR 

RELEASE 1 JaY 2015 if 

17. ZLECTRONICS SITES 

a. Leningrad NE 

b. Leningrad NW 

c. Leningrad SE 

d. Leningrad SW 

18. NINETY-EIGHT-FOOT PARABOLOID 

Simferopol 

19. EIGHT-DISH-ARRAY 

a. Yevpatoriya NW 

b. Yevpatoriya SE 

VH2 INTERFEROMETER 

a. Instrumentation Site No. 1, SSATC 

b. Instrumentation Site No. 3, SSATC 

c. Instrumentation Site No. 4, SSATC 

a. Instrumentation Site No. 5, SSATC 

e. Instrumentation Site No.:6, SSATC 

Instrumentation Site No. 7, SSATC 

Instrumentation Site No. 8, SSATC 

h. Instrumentation Site No. 9, SSATC 

i. Instrumentation Site No. 10, SSATC 

-1 • Instrumentation Site No. 11, SSATC 

k. Instrumentation Site No. 12, SSATC 

1. Instrumentation Site No. 14, SSATC 

. Instrumentation Site No. 15, SSATC 

n. Serpukhov (Moscow) 

o. Bronnitsy (Moscow) 

• -4 

Appendix I 

Page 7 of 1. Pages 

, ,;,1 
• . • 

NFZO APPRbYtaf 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2..'015 

Ki-1nak (Moscow) 

SL2cropol 

r. Yeniseysk 

s. Makat 

. Tyura Tam 

u. Khutor 

V. Uka 

w. Yelovka 

x. Talsi 

y. Elton 

Verkniy Baskhunchak 

21. TE SYSTEM (GUIDANCE) TYPES II, III 

a. Launch Area, C, KINTR 

o. Launch Area A, TTMTR 

c. Launch Area C, TTNTR 

L. Launch AreaE, TTNTR 

e. Launch Area F, TTETR 

f. Launch Area D, Plesetsk 

Launch Area E, Plesetsk 

h. Launch Area A, Kozelsk 

Launch Area B, Kozelsk 

j. Launch Area D, Kozelsk 

k. Launch Area E, Kozelsk 

Launch Area A, Tyx.en 

s. Launch Area C, Tyumen 

n. Launch Area A, Omsk 

• 

Appendix I 

Page 8 of 10 ?ages 

4.1 1.4. si•• ••••••■■••1 '111 
NROA4?PROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

o. Launch -rea G1 - G2, TEM 

p. Launch Area G3 - G4., TTI0211, 

q. Launch Area D2, TTIER 

r. Launch Area G7, Tliaft 

s. Launch Area H, TITER 

T. Launch Area I, TTMCB. 

U. Launch Area K, TTMPR 

V. Launch Area L, TTMrit 

w. Launch Area B, Uzhur 

x. Launch Area H. Uzhur 

y. Launch Area B, Dombarovskiy 

z. Launch Area G-2(POSS), Drovyanaya 

Launch Area D Imeni Gastello 

bb. Launch Area C, Aleysk 

cc. Launch Area A, Zhangiz - Tobe 

dd. Launch Area J. Zhangiz - Tobe 

ee. Launch Area A, Kartaly 

ff. Launch Area N, Kartaly 

..• P-7 Launch Area Al, Tatishchevo 

hh. Launch Area D7, Olovyannaya 

ii. Launch Area El, Olovyannaya 

„ Launch Area Fl, Olovyannaya 

22. 2E SYSTEM (INSTRIDENTATION) 

Launch Area C, KY1EB. 

u. Launch Area C, TTMTR 

Appendix I 

Page 9 of 10 Pages 

! , • 

-.-...._.. 
• g „ . 

NRO APPROVED FOR

ts-V7' •: r g 

RELEASE 1 JAY 2015 

• 

1.-- LI ' 

- _ 

• Z•P•Ci.:‘::::::-:1„1„ 

23. ":3:1 1 INTERFEROKTCFR 

Tyra Tan. 

b. Kapustin Yar 

C. Plesetsk 

Appendix I 

Page 10 of 10 Pages 

t1;77:. 
NRO APOrkOVElh FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

• 

APPENDIX II 

POSSIBLE TARGET SIGNALS 

L RF BAND REMARKS