alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.2

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

I, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer and Director of Domino's, Inc. and
Domino's Pizza, Inc., hereby constitute and appoint Harry J. Silverman, Mark E.
Nunnelly and Robert F. White, and each of them, my true and lawful attorney-in-
fact and agent, with full power of substitution and revocation, for me and in my
name, place and stead, to execute any and all amendments, including any post-
effective amendments and supplements to the Registration Statement on Form S-4
(File No. 333-74797), and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as
fully to all intents and purposes as I might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his or her
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


                                                 /s/ David A. Brandon
                                                 -----------------------------
Date: April 28, 1999                               David A. Brandon
**Exhibit 23.4**

 

**Consentof Leo R. Hwozdyk**

 

I consent tothe inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of North AmericanPalladium Ltd., which is being filed with the United States Securities andExchange Commission, of references to my name and to references to myinvolvement in the preparation of technical information relating to the Lac desIles Project, Ontario, included in the 2007 Annual Information Form ofNorth American Palladium Ltd., dated March 31, 2008 (the “AIF”).

 

I also consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-10(Nos. 333-147126, 333-146513 and 333-133668) of the references to my name andthe above-mentioned information in the AIF.

 

Dated this 31day of March, 2008.

 

 
|   |    /s/ Leo R. Hwozdyk |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
| Name:  | Leo R.  Hwozdyk, P. Eng.        |   |
| Title: | Associate  Mining Engineer,     |   |
|   | Scott Wilson  RPA               |   |

 

----
USCIB: 5.3/73 

MQ!ORANDtJM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USGIBEC: 

Subject: Tentative Minutes. 

Afi'illffil!ffi 1' OtJ'DMl!lit'i'S emttm 

001''.!WeRB MA':tm1:Q'b 

21 February 1955 

l. Foi~ded herewith is a copy or the Tentative Minutes of the 

Twent,r-fourth Meeting of USCIBEG. Please advise the Secretary if &;ny 

changes are desired. 

2. In the event there is no objection to these Minutes on the 

part of USCIBEC members by 7 March 1955 they will be considered 

approved • 

.Enclosure 

l copy of Tentative Minutes, 

Twenty-fourth Meeting of USCIBEO. . 

USCIB: 5.3/73 

Removed and f'il.ed 

USCIR: 14./16 

9.3/'?5 

5.4/21 

13.5/99 

29./15 

14.1/34 

4.2/38 

9.2/32 

5.3/72 

TOP SECRBT 

eclassifi ed and a roved for release b NSA on 11-06-2014 ursuant to E .0. 1352 
COtt.,FtDEN1lbt£ ID: ~54 7 

-

MINUTES OF THE TWENTY-FOURTH MEETING 

OF THE 

USCIB EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 

Captain Rufus L. Taylor, USN, Chairman 

PRESENT: 

STATE: 

DEFENSE: 

fil!!.: 

NSA: 

~: 

NAVY: 

-

AIR FORCE: 

~= 

SECRErARIAT: 

ALSO PRESENT: 

DEFENSE: 

~: 

ARMY: 

NAVY: 

-

AIR FORCE: 

Mr. Robert F. Packard 

(for Mr. T. A. Polyzoides) 

Mr. William. H. Godel 

Mr. S. Drake Ellis 

Captain Dwight M. Agnew, USN 

Lt. Colonel Richard Leffers 

Captain William. H. McCormick 

Lt. Colonel Frank J. Harrold, Jr. 

___ I· 

Mr. Hamill D. Jones 

Mrs. Daphne O. Tucker 

Mr. Philip J. Patton 

Mr. Robert E. Drake 

Captain Jack s. Holtwick, USN 

Mr. Hugh S. Erskine 

Mr. Benson K. Buffham 

Lt. Colonel E.dwin E. McBride 

Mr. John F. 0 1Gara 

Mr. Richard Battey 

CDR William F. Bringle 

LCDR Dora Davis 

Captain Allen T. Miller 

OGA 
C01'.'f'lDEtifB!Afu: AS 7 ~ 7 

., 

COMl"ln!tftIAL - l:J. S. EYES ONT:.¥ 

CIA: 

COMMITTEE CHAIR.MEN: Lt. Colonel Henry C. Simmons, USAF 

(Intelligence) 

Major William R. Culmer, USA 

(Security) 

. The Twenty-Fourth Meeting of the United States Communications 

OGA 

Int.elligence Board Executive Committee was held at 1330 on 28 Januacy 

1955, in Room 2E687, The National Defense Building, Washington, D. C. 

- 2 -

C0ft¥P.f'IDENTIAL 
CONFIDE!\'ftArL ID : AS 1114 7 

.. 

00NFIBEii'fIAfi - e.s. ET.l!'8 6NLY 

SUBJECT 'NUMBER 

USCIB: 5.3/72. 

Subject: 

Item 1 of the Agenda for the 24th Meeting of USCIBEC, 

held on 28 January 1955. 

Approval of the Final Minutes of the 22nd Meeting. 

THE CHAIBY.iAN asked if there were any objections to the subject 

minutes. 

There were no objections. 

DECISION: (28 January 1955) USCIBEC approved the final minutes of the 

22nd meeting as written. 

USCIB: 5.3/72 - 3 -
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 12 - 00341 - CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D .S.B., A CHILD

---------- FROM THE 323RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appellant Father attempts to appeal from a June 14, 2012 order terminating his parental rights to his son, D.S.B. On August 22 , 2012, we notified Father of our concern that we lack jurisdiction over this accelerated appeal because th e notice of appeal was due July 5, 2012, but was not filed until August 17, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b); see also Tex. R. App. P. 28.1(b) (providing that a post

- trial motion will not extend the time to perfect an accelerated appeal); In re K.A.F. , 160 S.W.3d 923, 927 (Tex. ) , cert. denied , 546

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

U.S. 961 (2005) (reasoning that a rule 26.1(a) motion will not extend the deadline to file notice of an accelerated appeal). We informed Father that this appeal may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal f iled with the court on or before September 4, 2012, a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Father did not file a response. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM
PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRI EL, J

. DELIVERED: October 11 , 2012
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1381 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1381

To require the President to make the text of trade agreements available 
   to the public in order for those agreements to receive expedited 
                      consideration from Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2015

Ms. Warren (for herself and Mr. Manchin) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the President to make the text of trade agreements available 
   to the public in order for those agreements to receive expedited 
                      consideration from Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Trade Transparency Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF TEXT OF TRADE AGREEMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Unless the President, not later than 60 days 
before the date of the enactment of an Act to provide the President 
with trade promotion authority, makes available to the public the 
scrubbed bracketed text of a trade agreement, the expedited procedures 
for the consideration of implementing bills under that Act shall not 
apply to the implementing bill submitted to Congress with respect to 
that agreement.
    (b) Effect of Later Enacted Law.--Federal statutory law adopted 
after the date of the enactment of this Act is subject to this Act 
unless such law explicitly excludes such application by reference to 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
..... REF ID:A6611~ 

USCIB: 10./19 

23 November 1954 

MEMORANJEl-1 lOR THE MBMlWR§ OF USCIB: 

Subject: Approva1 of USCIB 10./18 of 10 November 1954. 

Subject document stands approved by vote sheet action as of 

22 November 1954. 

USCIB: 10./19 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 08-04-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 
. - - ::; .... 

~I 

USCIB: 10./18 

10 November 1954 

'fOP SEeftE'f Fftt>'fl'I 

MEMORANDl.M FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Collaboration Between NSA and DSB Australia 

Refe:rences: (a) USCIB 10./5 of 12 November 1953. 

(b) USCIB 10./7 of 18 December 1953. 

1. Reference (a) circulated the Report of the Melbourne 

Tripartite Conference of September 1953 which included as its 

Appendix A a list of tasks being performed by DSB and delineated the 

scope of NSA/DSB exchanges. Reference (b) was the notice of approval 

of reference (a). 

3. It is requested that the attached vote sheet be executed with 

regard to the proposal contained in the enclosure and returned to this 

office by the close of business 22 November 1954. 

Enclosure 

NSA Serial 000497-S 

dtd 9 Nov 1954 

USCIB: 10./18 

TOP SECRE'f FROTH 

•j 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 
.A I .J/1-, 

!i9P SB~ J!lilG':l:'B 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25, 0, C. 

Serial: 000497-S 

9 Nov 54 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBEBS OF USCIB 

SUBJECT: Collaboration Between NSA and DSB 

1. Reference is made to the Melbourne Tripartite Conference papers 

which were inclosed with USCIB 10./5, dated 12 November 1954. 

2. The general principles of collaboration, as recommended by the 

Conference, have been approved by-tbe u.s. and the commonwealth nations 

concerned. Accordingly, NSA and DSB Will collaborate directly on those 

DSB tasks which the appropriate U.S. authorities have accepted as falling 

within the fie1d of collaboration. A lis"; of such tasks was included 

among the conference papers referred to above, and was accepted by USCIB. 

\ 3. On 5 November 1954, the bi.rector, rec ved a letter from 

the Director, \lCRQ wherein it was state 

The Director, GCHQ, stated further L.--e-....-s_s_ur_e__...,~-w:-oul--:;""d:--::-b-:e-t'.;""o--::t:-.-h-:e-mu:----t==ua:--::1 advantage of' NSA and DSB if' USCIB 

would agree to accepting this task as a further one falling within thPfield of' collaboration. He requeated, therefore, that the Director, NBA, 

arrange for USCIB consideration of this proposa1 by the Director, /GCBQ. 

4. The Director, RSA, concurs in the GCRQ views indicated/above, 

and recommends that USCIIs accept { /as aj;ask felling 

within the field of NSA-DSB col.18b0r6tion. EO 3_3(h)(2) 

• PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 :k8 

,- JOHN B. ACKERMAN 

· Major General, u.s. Air Force 

Vice Director 

'119P S:SOREl'i' CONTROL NUMBER 54-30lgfl 

COPY i/lf OF 47 COPIES 

PAGE l OF l PAGES 

TOP SECRET -:f=f<.o"Tl-f
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-10381

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE APOLINAR TORRES-LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(3:00-CR-166-1)

-------------------- November 2, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Defendant-Appella nt Jose Apolinar Torres-Lopez (“Torres”)

appeals from a conditional guilty plea for illegal re-entry after

deportation by an aggravated felon. 18 U.S.C. § 1326(a),(b)(2).

Torres contends that the district court erred in denying his motion

to dismiss his indictment, arguing the government issued it after

the limitations period expired.

We review de novo the district court’s interpretation of the

limitations provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. U nited States v.

Manges

, 110 F.3d 1162, 1169 (5th Cir. 1997)(citation omitted). W e2

review for clear error the court’s fact findings. A nderson v. City

of Bessemer City

, 470 U.S. 56 4, 573 (1985); s ee United States v.

Meador

, 138 F.3d 986, 991 (5th Cir. 1998 ). Under the clearly

erroneous standard , if the court’s account of the evidence is

plausible in light of the record viewed in its entirety, we will

not reverse that court even though convinced that had we been

sitting as the trier of fact, we would have weighted the evidence

differently. I d

. When there are two permissible views of the

evidence, the factfinder’ s choice between them cannot be clearly

erroneous. Id. at 573-74.

The time for prosecuting violation of § 1326 is set out in 18

U.S.C. § 3282, which establishes a five-year limitations period for

bringing non-capital offenses. S ee United States v. SantanaCastellano

, 74 F.3d 593, 597 (5th Cir. 1996). Limitations begin to

run on the completion of the offense. T oussie v. United States,

397 U.S. 112, 115 (19 70). Section 1326(a)(2) specifies separate

occasions when the offense of illegal re-entry by a deported alien

is complete: (1) when he illegally enters the United States; (2)

when he attempts to enter the United States illegally; or (3) when

he is found in the United States. Santana-Castellano , 74 F.3d at

597. A previously deported alien is “found in” the United States

when, first, his physical presence is noted and d iscovered by

immigration authorities and, second, the knowledge of the

illegality of his presence, through the exercise of diligence, can

reasonably be attributed to immigration authorities. Id.3

Based on the record, the district court did not err, clearly

or otherwise, when it found that Torres failed to establish his

completion of re-entry under the physical-presence prong of § 1326

at any time earlier than the five-yea r limitations period before

the indic tment. The court did not clearly err when it so found.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
IBCIB: 5.2/51 

Subject: 

Reference: 

• REF ID:~67947 e 

26 July- 1954 

Approval of the Minutes of the 104th ~eting of 

tECIB. 

IBCIB 5.2/50 dated 9 July- 1954 

l. No objection to the referenc~ having been received by 

2.3 July- 1954 the Tentative Minutes of the 104th Meeting or lJSCIB 

are approved. 

2. It is requested that ~ 'l«>rd TENTATIVE be deleted from 

the initial page of the minutes for each item considered and the 

word FINAL substituted therefor. 

lJSCIB 

e,....-" ... 

· @'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-01-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

U3CIB: 5.2/51 

24
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

# Current Images

HomeHistoryNational Cryptologic MuseumExhibits & ArtifactsCryptologic MuseumCurrent Exhibits

Search

Search

                              - All Images 
                              - Design Elements 
                              - NSA Historical Photographs 
                              - Other 

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (0.21 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Order entered June 1 2, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 01562
- CR PAUL ANGELO ESCOBAR, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Cou rt Cause No.
- 12
- 62912
- Q



### O RDER The Court REINSTATE S the appeal. On April 22, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the clerk’s and reporter’s records had not been filed. On April 24, 2014, we received the reporter’s record
and o n June 10, 2014, we received the clerk’s record. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the April 22, 2014 order requiring findings. Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.
/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. PF15-1-000]

                    On January 13, 2015, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) issued a                     *Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Planned PennEast Pipeline Project, Requests for Comments on Environmental Issues, and Notice of Public Scoping Meetings*                     (NOI). On January 23 and 26, 2015, we issued notices to postpone the January 27 and 28, 2015 public scoping meetings listed in the NOI. The revised dates for the scoping meetings are:                

*When:*                     Wednesday, February 25, 2015.                

*Time:*                     6 p.m.                

*Where:*                     West Trenton Ballroom, 40 W. Upper Ferry Road, West Trenton, New Jersey 08628.                

*When:*                     Thursday, February 26, 2015.                

*Time:*                     6 p.m.                          ( print page 7863)    

*Where:*                     The Grand Colonial, 86 Route 173 West, Hampton, New Jersey 08827.                

                    These public meetings will be posted on the Commission calendar located at                     *www.ferc.gov/​EventCalendar/​EventsList.aspx*                     along with other related information. Additional information about the project is available from the Commission's Office of External Affairs, at (866) 208-FERC, or on the FERC Web site at                     *www.ferc.gov*                     using the “eLibrary” link and the project docket number (                    *i.e.,*                     PF15-1).                

Dated: February 5, 2015.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-02932 Filed 2-11-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
USCIB: 14./11 

l ' - / 

14 December 1954 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

24 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

MJ!lvlORANDUM. FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: I 

4. THIS DOCUMENT AND ITS ENCLOSURE CONTAIN COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE INFOWvlATION AND SHALL BE HANDLED ONLY IN CHANNELS EXPRESSLY 

PROVIDED FOR COMINT. 

Enclosure 

WL 900, Dec 1954 

USCIB: 14./11 

TOP SECRET 
• 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Enclosure with USCIB 14./11 dtd 14 Dec 1954. 

TOP SECRET 
•• REF ID:A65164 

e 24 

USCIB: 14./9 

l2 May l954 

'K>P SEJGR£'!1 B • S. El¥EO OMLY 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Reference: USCIB 14./8 dated lO May 1954. 

The following extract from a message from SUSLO, London to the 

Executive Secretary is circulated for information in connection with 

the reference: 

USCIB: 14./9 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-07-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

'FOP SECRET
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1401 

To provide for the annual designation of cities in the United States as 

an ‘‘American World War II City’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 20, 2015 

Mr. TILLIS (for himself and Mr. BURR) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To provide for the annual designation of cities in the United 

States as an ‘‘American World War II City’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ANNUAL DESIGNATION OF CITIES IN UNITED 

4 STATES AS AN ‘‘AMERICAN WORLD WAR II 

5 CITY’’. 

6 (a) ANNUAL DESIGNATION.—The Secretary of Vet7 erans Affairs shall, in consultation with the Secretary of 

8 Defense, designate each year at least one city in the 

9 United States as an ‘‘American World War II City’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1401 IS

1 (b) CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATION.—The criteria used 

2 for designations under subsection (a) shall include the fol3 lowing: 

4 (1) Contributions by a city to the war effort 

5 during World War II, including defense manufac6 turing carried out in the city, bond drives conducted 

7 or supported by the city, service of the population of 

8 the city in the Armed Forces, and the presence of 

9 military facilities in the city. 

10 (2) Efforts by a city to preserve the history of 

11 the contributions of the city to the war effort during 

12 World War II, including through the establishment 

13 of preservation organizations or museums, the res14 toration of facilities that contributed to the war ef15 fort, and the recognition of veterans of World War 

16 II. 

17 (c) FIRST DESIGNATION.—The first city designated 

18 as an American World War II City pursuant to subsection 

19 (a) shall be the City of Wilmington, North Carolina. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS