alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004078EN.01082201.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/822 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/822

---

(2004/C 78 E/0875)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3518/03

by Christopher Huhne (ELDR) to the Commission

(25 November 2003)

Subject:   Bioptic driving

Subject:

| 1. | Will the Commission outline the minimum vision standards (including acuity and vision fields) for driving licensure stipulated by EU regulation? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Will the Commission outline the minimum vision standards (including acuity and vision fields) for driving licensure stipulated by EU regulation?

| 2. | Will it also outline the specific vision standards (that go beyond the EU minimum) for each Member State? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Will it also outline the specific vision standards (that go beyond the EU minimum) for each Member State?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(15 January 2004)

(15 January 2004)

| 1. | The minimal vision requirements for obtaining a driving licence can be found in Article 6 of Annex III of Council Directive 91/439/EEC of 29 July 1991 (1). The Commission does not anticipate proposing any revisions to this Directive on the question of minimum vision standards. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The minimal vision requirements for obtaining a driving licence can be found in Article 6 of Annex III of Council Directive 91/439/EEC of 29 July 1991 (1). The Commission does not anticipate proposing any revisions to this Directive on the question of minimum vision standards.

1

| 2. | All Member States have introduced visual requirements that correspond with the minimum requirements of the above mentioned Directive. As the Honourable Member has been informed of in the Commission's reply to his previous questions E-1231/03 (2), E-2568/03 (3) and E-2569/03 (4), a special working group for vision has been established in 2003 which plans to screen the legislation/actual situation in the different Member States during the coming year 2004. The results of this examination will be made public by the Commission as soon as they are available. |
| --- | --- |

2.

All Member States have introduced visual requirements that correspond with the minimum requirements of the above mentioned Directive. As the Honourable Member has been informed of in the Commission's reply to his previous questions E-1231/03 (2), E-2568/03 (3) and E-2569/03 (4), a special working group for vision has been established in 2003 which plans to screen the legislation/actual situation in the different Member States during the coming year 2004. The results of this examination will be made public by the Commission as soon as they are available.

2

3

4

---

(1)  OJ L 237, 24.8.1991.

1

(2)  OJ C 58 E, 6.3.2004, p. 52.

2

(3)  OJ C 58 E, 6.3.2004, p. 181.

3

(4)  See page 129.

4

---
EXHIBIT 99.1

             Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
              Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Alan C. Bashforth, the Chief Executive Officer of Science Dynamics
Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal
    quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
    Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.



Dated: August 14, 2003



                                    /s/ Alan C. Bashforth
                                    ---------------------
                                    Name: Alan C. Bashforth
                                    Title: Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
                   HEALTHCOR HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
                                   UNAUDITED
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
Basic and diluted earnings per share                                          Years Ended  December 31,
                                                                             ---------------------------
                                                               1998                     1997                  1996
                                                       --------------------      ------------------     -----------------
<S>                                                   <C>                       <C>                    <C>            
Net income (loss)                                              $(98,270,302)           $(15,638,413)           $5,332,008
                                                        ====================      ==================     =================
Shares:                                                 
    Weighted average common shares issued                         10,091,340              10,053,734             7,770,175
    Assuming exercise of options, reduced by the        
      number of common shares which could have                                              
      been purchased with the proceeds from             
      exercise of such options                                           --                      --               270,075
                                                        --------------------      ------------------     -----------------
    Weighted average number of common shares            
       outstanding, as adjusted                                   10,091,340              10,053,734             8,040,250
                                                        ====================      ==================     =================
Net income (loss) per common share:                     
       Basic earnings (loss) per share                          $     (9.74)            $      (1.56)           $     0.69
                                                        ====================      ==================     =================
       Diluted earnings (loss)  per share                       $     (9.74)            $      (1.56)           $     0.66
                                                        ====================      ==================     =================
</TABLE>




                                      58
----

            DECISION No 205

of 17 October 2005         

on the scope of the notion of ‘partial unemployment’ with regard to frontier workers

(Text of relevance to the EEA and to the EU/Switzerland Agreement)

(2006/351/EC)

THE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION ON SOCIAL SECURITY FOR MIGRANT WORKERS,

Having regard to Article 81(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (1), under the terms of which it is responsible for dealing with any administrative question arising from Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 and subsequent Regulations,

Having regard to Article 71(1)(a) of the said Regulation,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

The Chair of the Administrative Commission

Anna HUDZIECZEK            

----

(1)OJ L 149, 5.7.1971, p. 2. Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No 631/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 100, 6.4.2004, p. 1).

(2)  Judgement of 15 March 2001 in case C-444/98, ‘            R. J. de Laat/Bestuur van het Landelijk instituut sociale verzekeringen            ’, ECR 2001, pp. I-2229 et seq.

----
.. -~209~ 

USCIB: 7 ./15 

23 June 1955 

'f6P ~RET 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: SACLANT 11Y11 Planning. 

l. The enclosed memorandum .from the Chairman, LSIB to the Chairman, 

USCIB is forwarded for information. 

2. Serial ID-145,, referred to in paragraph 1 of the enclosure, is 

the SACLANT counterpart of ID-9139,, which sets forth principles governing 

the SACEUR "Y" structure, and which was forwarded to all members as 

CIB # 00268,, 31 December 1953. 

USCIB 

Enclosure 

LSIB/187/55 dtd 10th June 1955. 

USCIB: 7./15 

TOP SECRET 

eclassified and a roved for release b NSA on 09-05-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352 

24 
... REF ID:A58209 

3. 3 !hi I 2 

86-36/50 USC 3605 

I,
<PAGE>
 
                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, DC  20549

                                   FORM 8-K

                                CURRENT REPORT


                    Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the
                        Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report:                                               September 16, 1998



                         Providence Energy Corporation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 
 
    Rhode Island                    001-10032                    05-0389170
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State of incorporation            (Commission                 (IRS Employer
  or organization)                 File Number)              Identification No.)
 
100 Weybosset Street, Providence, Rhode Island                     02903
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)                         (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number:    (401) 272-5040
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                      N/A
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
<PAGE>
 
Item 5.  Other events.
         ------------ 

     Attached to this report as Exhibit A is a copy of a release dated
September 2, 1998 by the Registrant with respect to the matters referred to
therein.



                                  SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                 PROVIDENCE ENERGY CORPORATION
                                 GARY S. GILLHEENEY


                                 By:      /s/ Gary S. Gillheeney
                                    ------------------------------------------  
                                 Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
                                 Treasurer and Assistant Secretary


Date:  September 16, 1998
• REF ID:A68052 • 

USCIB: 5.1/5 

2 Harch 1954 

Ml!MOR.~DUM FOR THE ?,!EMBERS OF USCIB: 

Suh°ject: Change ~FBI Membership on USCIB. 

l. The Chainnan 1 USCIB, h8s been advised by the Director of the 

Federal Bureau of Investigation or- the appointment of l:~r. L. V. 

Boardman to USCIB membership, vice Mr. D. Milton Ladd. 11r. Boardman 

has replaced Nr. Ladd as Assistant to the Director, FBI. 

2. The above e.ppointmen~ is effective as of 17 Februa:ey 1954. 

3. Mr. Victor P. Keay will coμtinue as the ·a.ltemate ·FBI member • 

USCIB: 5.1/5 

. 

L'US 

'~ ~A]tOR 

tain, lt:--'~. MaviJ 

ec~tive Secretary, qsCIB 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 05-07-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

-.,, 

\-

31
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 14

- 00343

- CR

IN RE MARSHALL S. HI CKS

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Marshall Shane Hicks was convicted in 2010 of indecency with a child. His
original appeal of that conviction was transferred from this Court to the Thirteenth
Court of Appeals (Corpus Christi). That appeal was dismissed because the conviction

was based o n a plea bargain and Hicks had no right to appeal.
On October 30, 2014, Hicks filed a document entitled “Motion for Judgment to
Correct Clerical Mistake (Nunc Pro Tunc)” as an original proceeding requesting relief
directly from this Court. The purpose o f a nunc pro tunc judgment is to provide a

method for trial courts to make a correction when there is a discrepancy between theIn re Hicks Page 2

judgment as pronounced in court and the written judgment reflected in the record.

Blanton v. State , 369 S.W.3d 894, 897

- 898 (Te x. Crim. App. 2012).
By this proceeding, Hicks has asked this Court to correct the opinion and
judgment by the Thirteenth Court of Appeals. We have no jurisdiction over the
opinions or judgments of other courts of appeals. See T EX

. C ONST

. A RT . V, § 6(a ).
Accordingly, this proceeding is dismissed.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed November 20, 2014 Do not publish [OT06]
USCIB: 3.2/3 

1 September 1954 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Canadian Indoctrination Totals. 

The enclosure is !orwarded !or information. 

Enclosure 

CRC Memo CB 15 (012) 

dtd 18 Aug 1954. 

USCIB: 3. 2/3 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-25-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

TOP SECRET 

24 
TOP SjjgjlEib : AS 7 §.2. a 

• 

File No. CB 15 (012) 

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL 

CANADA 

TOP SESRl!i! 

OTTAWA, 18 August 1954 

Memorandum. for the Executive Secretary, 

U.S. Communications Intelligence Board. 

In accordance with paragraph 26 of Appendix B 

to the CANUSA Agreement, we are forwarding herewith a statement of the approximate totals of Canadian Category III . indoctrinated personnel as of 30 July 1954. 

Att 

/dl 

Copies: CANSLO (W) ·sus10 

(Simed) 

Secretary, 

Communications Research \Committee. 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Enclosure with USCIB 3.2/3 dtd 1 Sep 1954. 

TOP SECRET 
' 

18 August 1954 

Totals or Canadian Category III Indoctrinated Personnel 

as or 30 Jul.y 1954 

EO 3.3(h) (2) 

Department PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 Approximate Total 

TOP SECRET
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 4, 2024

NO. 03-23-00795-CV

Peter Giorgiutti, Appellant

v.

Valeria Pozhitkova, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES SMITH AND THEOFANIS

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

Having reviewed the record, the Court holds that Peter Giorgiutti has not prosecuted his appeal

and did not comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses 

the appeal for want of prosecution. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both 

in this Court and in the court below.
Exhibit 23.4



LOGO

Consent of Dave Penna

I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of North American Palladium Ltd., which is being filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission, of references to my name and references to my involvement in the preparation of NI 43-101 Technical Report for Lac des Iles Mine, Ontario Incorporating a Preliminary Economic Assessment of Mine Expansion
Plan (effective date of February 18, 2015) included in the 2014 Annual Information Form of North American Palladium Ltd., dated March 31, 2015 (the AIF).

I also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-13766) and Registration
Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-200762) of the references to my name and the above-mentioned information in the AIF.

Dated this
31st day of March, 2015.



|     |  |                        
|---- |  | -----------------------
|Per: |  | /s/ Dave Penna         
|     |  | Dave Penna, P.Geo.     
|     |  | Principal Geologist    
|     |  | Lac des Iles Mines Ltd.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMAITON EXTRACTED FROM UNITED
INTERNATIONAL HOLDING INC.'S FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 28,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN IT'S ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                          68,784
<SECURITIES>                                     4,293
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,939
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               173,453
<PP&E>                                         248,720
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,378
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 819,936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           85,314
<BONDS>                                        674,960
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           31,293
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           390
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   819,936
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,555
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,116
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,961
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,859
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              79,659
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (138,825)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (138,825)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (138,825)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 31, 1997 and 1996, the Consolidated
Statements of Operations for each of the three years ended January 31, 1997,
1996 and 1995, and the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the
three years ended January 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                          32,313
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,824
<ALLOWANCES>                                        30
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,605
<PP&E>                                           1,714
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (525)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,911
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           136
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,447
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,860
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,088
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,847
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,855
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (456)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,842
<INCOME-TAX>                                       536
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,306
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,306
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 333-64481) of CMC Securities Corporation IV pertaining to the issuance
of a maximum $2 billion aggregate principal balance of collateralized mortgage
obligations and in the related prospectus and prospectus supplements of our
report dated January 25, 2002, with respect to the financial statements of CMC
Securities Corporation IV included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 2001.




                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP




Dallas, Texas
March 26, 2002
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6089

DONNIE D. COMBER,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

DOUGLAS F. GANSLER, Attorney General of the State of 

Maryland; JOHN WOLFE,

Respondents – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District 

Judge. (1:08-cv-01793-WDQ)

Submitted: July 26, 2010 Decided: August 17, 2010

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donnie D. Comber, Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, OFFICE 

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Donnie D. Comber seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Comber has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED