alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement
of Prodigy Communications Corporation (the "Company") on Form S-8 of our report
appearing in Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement No. 333-64233 on Form S-1
of the Company, which report was dated April 30, 1998, except as to the
information presented under Additional Financing in Notes 8 and 11 for which the
date is September 21, 1998, and to the information presented under Restatement
of Financial Statements in Note 1 for which the date is January 22, 1999, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements of Prodigy Communications
Corporation as of December 31, 1996 and 1997 and for each of the two years in
the period ended December 31, 1997, and of our report dated September 10, 1998,
on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Prodigy Services
Company for the year ended December 31, 1995 and the five and one-half month
period ended June 16, 1996.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Boston, Massachusetts

February 11, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         445,519
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  364,188
<ALLOWANCES>                                   107,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,705,092
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,592,134
<PP&E>                                      11,317,769
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,864,553
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,045,350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,884,014
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,000,000
<COMMON>                                    31,232,465
<OTHER-SE>                                (42,401,129)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,045,350
<SALES>                                      2,895,022
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,895,022
<CGS>                                        3,091,245
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,091,245
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,687,729
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               107,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,052,255
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,739,984)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,739,984)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.58)


</TABLE>
REF ID:A67471 

COMFIDEN'f'IAL -

SeG1uity IafeFme.tien 

USCIB: 4/71 

9 July 195.3 

MEMQR.ANDUM FOR THE MJ!iMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: USCIB Security Committee. 

1. In reply to USCIB 4/60, 23 June 195.3, USCIB members 

have designated the following as their representatives on the 

USCIB SeQurity Committee: 

STATE: Mr. Robert F. Packard 

DEFENSE: (No representation desired at this time) 

FBI: Mr. S. D. Ellis 

NSA: Mr. James H. Douglas 

24 

ARMY: Lt. Colonel Emery E. BeUonby · (Lt. Colonel Paul B. Schvieker, Alternate) 

NAVY: Commander W. L. Thomas 

(Commander J. L. Holmes, Alternate) 

AIR FORCE: Maj or Harry J. Thompson 

(Major Wm. s. J. Curley, Alternate) 

OIA: 

2. Pursuant to paragraph 5, USCIB Directiv~ Number 10, 

Lt. Commander P. J.i Karl, of the Executive Secretariat, is designated non-voting Chairman or the Security Committee. 

Copy to: 

Cte Mbrs 

USCIB: 4/71 

OGA 

UFUS L. ~~Jtt 

aptain, U. s. Navy tive Secretary, USCIB 

CONFIDElN'f'IAL 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 09-26-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS



I, Mark Buckrey, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Sterion Incorporated;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





|August 13 , 2004 | /s/ Mark Buckrey       
|---------------- | -----------------------
|                 | Mark Buckrey           
|                 | Chief Financial Officer
#### K. M. C. WILLIAMSON v. LOCK’S CREEK CANAL COMPANY.

*Offer of Compromise.*

An offer to compromise a suit under soetiou 32S o£ the Code must fee made by aZZihe defendants or by their common attorney.

MotioN of defendant (in a case removed from Cumberland) to tax costs against the plaintiff, heard at December -Special Term, 1880, of Robeson Superior Court, before Avery, *J.*

Motion refused, .appeal by defendant.

*Mr. Geo. M. Rose,*for plaintiff.

*Messrs. Rowland & McLean*and *W. A.*Guthriei, for defendant.

*630Smith, C'. J.

The- actio» is to recover damages for diverting the flow of water from its natural channel to the-plaintiff’s mill,, and diminishing the former supply, in which a verdict for one penny was- rendered. The case stood for trial on Wednesday of the second week of the term of Robeson superior court whieh began on October 25th,. 1=880> but. was continued and tried at a special term, held in December-following. 0:n October 26-th, 1880-, a proposition was made-to the plaintiff in writing and in these words.; Is behalf of the defendants,. I offer to allow judgment to- be taken against the defendants- in the above action, (describing it by its title) for the sum, of fifty dollars, with costs.. (Signed by A. A. McKeithan.)

The defendants- proposed to show in support of their motion to tax the plaintiff with the- costs accrued since his; failure- to accept the offer,, that it was made by the authority of all- the defendants, and that the defendant McKeithan was president of the corporation and in that capacity had retained the attorney who was defending the action... The evidence was rejected, and the court being of opinion that, the offer was not a compliance with the provisions of section 328 of the Code* refused the motion and adjudged the costs against the defendants.

It is obvious the offer, to be sufficient under the statute,, must be in a form that will enable the plaintiff, if he- accepts it, to- have judgment entered by theclerk conformably to the offer. It must consequently come from all. the defendants,. or their common attorney at law, since otherwise the clerk would not be authorized to enter judgment against, all. It is equally plain that a verbal authority to- be supported by intrinsic proof only, if indeed any such authority can be conferred upon one of several defendants by the others,to assent to such a record, will not warrant the-entering up of judgment against all. The plaintiff’s right is to-have judgment upon the submitted offer in the pending acr *631tion and consequently against all whom he has sued, and unless the offer is commensurate with this right, it is unavailing under the act.

This seems to be the construction put upon the section by the courts of New York, so far as our limited facilities of access to their reports will permit an examination to be made, and in our opinion is a fair and reasonable interpretation of its requirements. *Burney*v. *LeGal,*19 Barb., 594; *Schneider*v. *Jacobi,*1 Duer., 694.

There is no error and the judgment must be affirmed.

No error. Affirmed.
F OR P UB L I CAT I ON U N I TED STA TES C O U R T O F A PPEA LS FO RTH E N I N TH C I R C U I T F AI R H OU S I NG CO UN CI L OF S AN F E R N A N D O V A L L E Y ; T H E F A IR HO US I NG CO UN CI L OF S AN D I E G O , i n d ivi d u ally an d on b e h al f of th e G E N E R A L P U B L IC , P l ainti ffs - A p p el l an t s, v. R O O M M A TES. C O M , LLC , D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 04- 56916 D . C. N o . CV - 0 3 - 0 9 3 8 6 - PA

O R D ER

F AI R H OU S I NG CO UN CI L OF S AN F E R N A N D O V A L L E Y ; T H E F A IR HO US I NG CO UN CI L OF S AN D I E G O , i n d ivi d u ally an d on b e h al f of th e G E N E R A L P U B L IC , P l ainti ffs - A p p el l ees, v. R O O M M A TE. C O M , LLC , D e f

e n d ant - A p p e llant. N o. 04- 57173 D . C. N o . CV - 0 3 - 0 9 3 8 6 - PA



# FI LED DE C 13 2007 CAT HY A. CATTE RSON, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSpage 2

B ef ore: KOZ I NS KI , C hi ef Judg e. T he stipu l ati onof the parti es t o al l ow fi l ing of a bri ef by am i cicuri ae A m az on. c om , e ta l . , i s r e j e c t e d. A m i c ic ur i a e A m az on. c om , e ta l . , ar e de ni e d l e ave t o f i l e abr i e f

. S e e C ir c ui tA dvi s oryC om m i tt e e N ot e t o 9th C ir . R . 29- 2 ( July1, 20 07 ).
24 

• 

USCIB: 8.3/6 

25 April 19 55 

'fOP SEen.M' 

Ml!MORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject.: 

Reference: 

1. Further to the I"~i'~l'~cel I has forwarded the following memorandum fJ:"()]ll t,l'le Secret,g.ry,1.rl----,.l.,..to___,t""!'"h-e"""""Executi ve Secretary, USCIB: 

3605 

USCIB: 8.3/6 
USCIB: 8.3/6 

'l'OP iiiQ:m!a' 

Subject: 

·e • 

25 April 1955 

2. The notification mentioned in the reference did not indicate 

the degree of reluctance and the extent of con4itions described above. 

Neither did it indicate a requirement for USC!B concurrence in those 

conditions. Eo 3. 3 (h) (2) 

FL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

3. On the assumption that the conditions described above will not 

vitiate the purpose of the proposed. relocation,, this office will, in 

the absence of ob.iection from any member by the~ of business 

Thursday, 28 April 1955, advise the Secretary ,L_ __ Jthat the conditions 

specified are accepted by USCIB. 

Executive 

~~~ Secretary, USCIB 

USCIB; 8,J/6 - 2 -

TOP SECRET
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,977                  24,714
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,393                  15,938
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,663)                 (2,361)
<INVENTORY>                                     55,585                  25,222
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,375                  71,764
<PP&E>                                          49,103                  38,424
<DEPRECIATION>                                (11,080)                (20,631)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 154,730                  96,115
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,300                  25,881
<BONDS>                                        119,272                 115,257
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            9,237                  42,543
<PREFERRED>                                          3                       3
<COMMON>                                         6,090                   6,498
<OTHER-SE>                                    (23,166)               (103,658)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   154,730                  96,115
<SALES>                                        184,660                 104,994
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               184,660                 104,994
<CGS>                                          101,294                  93,168
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  101,294                  93,168
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                81,131                  64,215
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,573                  14,456
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,812)                (66,506)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,268)                   9,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,544)                (75,506)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                 (1,345)
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,544)                (76,851)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
NRO Awarded the David Packard Excellence 

in Acquisition Award

June 18, 2002

The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) was awarded the David Packard Excellence in 

Acquisition Award for its GeoLITE satellite demonstration program during ceremonies at the 

Pentagon Tuesday.

The Packard Award is a Department of Defense honor that recognizes its organizations that have 

made highly significant contributions which demonstrated exemplary innovation and best 

acquisition, practices. The NRO's GeoLITE program used corporate best practices to provide a 

system that was delivered on schedule and under budget. In addition, life cycle costs were 

reduced by designing a spacecraft that could be operated by a single person and where practical 

the program took advantage of off the shelf technologies. Another success of the GeoLITE 

program was the partnership between the Massachusetts Institute of Technology/Lincoln 

Laboratory, the government funded research laboratory, and TRW, the prime contractor. The two 

developers worked together to design an interface between the GeoLITE lasercom payload and 

the satellite bus that provided outstanding on-orbit performance.

The GeoLITE program investigated the use of laser communications technologies to eliminate 

communications as a constraint to the collection, analysis, processing and dissemination of 

information critical to national security. The satellite also serves as a theater data dissemination 

system in the Western Pacific region. The GeoLITE team was made up of various government 

and industry partners within the NRO.

"The lessons learned from the GeoLITE program are being shared within the NRO and the 

Department of Defense." said Peter Teets, Undersecretary of the Air Force and NRO Director. "It 

has forged a path that we hope will be the future of space-based communications."

Teets was presented with the award along with 20 other members of the team, by Edward C. 

Aldridge, Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logisitics.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000,
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          92,544
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  217,675<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     31,429
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               369,424
<PP&E>                                         274,348
<DEPRECIATION>                                 202,450
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 515,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          196,954
<BONDS>                                         33,066
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,736
<OTHER-SE>                                     266,798
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   515,624
<SALES>                                        257,580
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               387,386
<CGS>                                          162,547
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  246,151
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               143,605<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,288
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,263
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,637)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,637)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)
<FN>
<F1>Accounts receivable in the Consolidated Balance Sheet is shown net of
allowances for doubtful accounts.
<F2>Other expenses include Product development expenses, Sales and marketing
expenses, and General and administrative expenses.
</FN>



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
St. Joseph Capital Corporation on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-14999) dated
October 29, 1996, relative to the St. Joseph Capital Bank 401(k) Plan, of our
reports, dated February 19, 1999 on the consolidated financial statements of St.
Joseph Capital Corporation as of December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 and for the 
years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and for the period from February 29, 1996 
(date of inception) to December 31, 1996, included in St. Joseph Capital 
Corporation's Annual Reports on Form 10-KSB for 1998.



                                               /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
                                               Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

South Bend, Indiana
March 25, 1999














                                       60
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Dieter P. Schilling, President and Chief Executive Officer of Delphax Technologies Inc. (the
Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                                      |  | 
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------ |  | 
|Dated: May 14, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Dieter P. Schilling              |  | 
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Dieter P. Schilling                  |  | 
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |  |