alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1380/2006

of 19 September 2006         

on import licences in respect of beef and veal products originating in Botswana, Kenya, Madagascar, Swaziland, Zimbabwe and Namibia

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2286/2002 of 10 December 2002 on the arrangements applicable to agricultural products and goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products originating in the African, Caribbean and Pacific States (ACP States) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1706/98 (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2247/2003 of 19 December 2003 laying down detailed rules for the application in the beef and veal sector of Council Regulation (EC) No 2286/2002 on the arrangements applicable to agricultural products and certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products originating in the African, Caribbean and Pacific States (ACP States) (3), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The following Member States shall issue on 21 September 2006 import licences for beef and veal products, expressed as boned meat, originating in certain African, Caribbean and Pacific States, in respect of the following quantities and countries of origin:

Article 2

Licence applications may be submitted, pursuant to Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2247/2003, during the first 10 days of October 2006 for the following quantities of boned beef and veal:

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 September 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 September 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

(2)OJ L 348, 21.12.2002, p. 5.

(3)OJ L 333, 20.12.2003, p. 37. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1118/2004 (OJ L 217, 17.6.2004, p. 10).

(4)OJ L 302, 31.12.1972, p. 28. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 807/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 36).

----
##### 



Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

The undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

(1)  The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

|     |  |                |  |                                     
|---- |  | -------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date |  | August 8, 2003 |  | /s/ Jay A. Herman                   
|     |  |                | 
|     |  |                |  | Jay A. Herman                       
|     |  |                |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

|     |  |                |  |                                           
|---- |  | -------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date |  | August 8, 2003 |  | /s/ Robert M. Barniskis                   
|     |  |                | 
|     |  |                |  | Robert M. Barniskis                       
|     |  |                |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Bonnie L. Herron, the Chief Financial Officer of Intelligent Systems
Corporation, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended June 30, 2004 of Intelligent Systems Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and we have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by such report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors:  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 13, 2004
    
    /s/
    
    Bonnie L. HerronBonnie L. HerronChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intergraph Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R.
Halsey Wise, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350), that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                  By:    /s/ R. Halsey Wise
                                         -------------------------------------
                                  Name:  R. Halsey Wise
                                  Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
                                  Date:  November 8, 2004

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Intergraph Corporation and will be retained by Intergraph
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7570

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CLESHON JOAQUIN MACK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (4:04-cr-00582-TLW-1; 4:16-cv01818-TLW)

Submitted: April 17, 2018 Decided: April 19, 2018

Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cleshon Joaquin Mack, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Cleshon Joaquin Mack seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mack has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
# CE2004084EN.01025501.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/255 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/255

---

(2004/C 84 E/0302)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3858/03

by Raffaele Costa (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(16 December 2003)

Subject:   Invalidity pensions in the European Union

Subject:

It transpires from the Court of Auditors' Special Report 3/2003 (1), on the invalidity pensions scheme of the European institutions, that in 2001, 0,78 % of the European Communities' staff retired due to invalidity.

1

Could the Commission state the percentage of staff awarded invalidity pensions in 2002, and what checks and controls have been undertaken?

Answer given by Mr Kinnock on behalf of the Commission

(11 February 2004)

(11 February 2004)

In 2002 invalidity pensions were awarded to 1,1 % of Commission staff (officials and temporary agents).

In those instances where, in its decision granting invalidity, the Invalidity Committee recommend that checks are necessary, they are carried out systematically until the former official reaches the age of 60 (in accordance with Article 15 of Annex VIII of the Staff Regulations).

Every individual official subject to such checks is required to undergo an in-depth examination by the medical service. If deemed appropriate, that examination is complemented by a further analysis carried out by external experts.

In 2002, 154 such checks were carried out. Three officials were reinstated during this period.

The attention of the Honourable Member is drawn to the reply by the Commission to the special report from the Court of Auditors 3/2003, in which the Commission announced its intention of developing an overall policy aimed at both preventing invalidity and helping and encouraging rehabilitation, and to inform the Parliament of the results of its work.

---

(1)  OJ C 109, 7.5.2003, p. 1.

1

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF THE

GUARDIANSHIP OF

MARJORIE J. VIRGIL, AN

INCAPACITATED PERSON. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 14

- 00173

- CV

Appeal from

Probate Court No. 1

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2009

- G00166)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see T EX .R.A PP .P. 43.5 , on the judgment and all

costs, both in this Court and the court below for which let execution issue. This decision shall be

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 27 TH DAY OF APRIL , 2016

.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Hughes, J, and Barajas, C.J. (Senior Judge)

Barajas, C.J., (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA CAUSE NO. DA 22 - 0478 STATE OF MONTANA , Plaintiff and Appellant , and JOSIAH BRACKETT ,

D efendant and A

ppellee . **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s mo tion for extension of t ime, an d good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 31 , 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brie f on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 27 2023

06/27/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0478
<PAGE>
 
                                                             EXHIBIT 23.2
                                                             ------------


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                      ----------------------------------

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration 
Statement on Form S-8 in connection with the Non-Qualfied Stock Option of our 
report dated January 26, 1999, relating to the financial statements, which 
appears in the 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders of Banyan Systems 
Incorporated, which is incorporated by reference in Banyan Systems 
Incorporated's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998. 
We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January 
26, 1999, relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in such 
Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                    /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                    -------------------------------------

                                    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
May 14, 1999
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEA JULY 2015 India via BYEMAN 

9ntr51 System 

RT DATA ENTERED 

-.N DATE 

Mr} MICROFICH D 

DATE 

e41-V 

2.0340RANDUM FOR DR. SEAMANS 

SUBJECT: NASA Proposals to Study MOL ATS and DORIAN 

Technology 

NASA has proposed two actions related to continuing 

exaMitation of their potential for using MOL developed 

hardware and technology. These are contained in their 

letters of 12 September 1969 (Atch 1 and 2). These actions 

inVOlve the Acquisition and Tracking System (ATS) and the 

DORIAN optics technology. 

Regarding the ATS, NASA desires to-contract with 

General Electric Co. and possibly ITEK through the Air 

Force (SAFSP) to study the applicability of this hardware 

to their experiments program. This appears to be a 

straight forward first step and we agree with NASA's suggestion that the existing security guidelines remain in 

effect during such a study. To support this activity, we 

ShOuid inform the affected termination contracting officer 

of the need to freeze the ATS and related equipment pending 

completion of the study and/or transfer of the equipment to 

NASA. Required from NASA are the funds and a statement of 

work to form a basis for an SAFSP contract. 

Preparation of the work statement might be expedited 

by providing NASA with the assistance of two or three Air 

'ere* officers, now in AYSC Headquarters and thoroughly 

familiar with the equipment in question. Such an arrangement would also facilitate establishing a DOD/Air Force 

position of interest and intent regarding the experiment. 

DORIAN 

Randle via BYEMAN 

Control System 

Page of __!:.-'pagofi 

Copy of oopioa 

SUSI, Goat rr,1 . 

Bye_ 68.54o--(e 
A ;se 

Jil 

Handle via B. 

Conte! Sytnin 

13(f.A..&I 304 

o f 

•.)1! 

NRO APPRt, ED FOR 

RELEASE 1 ULY 2015 

The question relating to the DORIAN optics technology 

appears equally straight forward and workable through the 

steps suggested by NASA. Arrangements have been made for 

a visit to the Eastman facility for the purpose proposed. 

Mr. Hubbard of the MOL Office will represent the NRO and 

accompany the party to Rochester. 

In general, we feel it is most advisable to conduct 

all studies related to determining feasibility and desirability of using these equipments within the BYEMAN security 

system. At the appropriate time the pertinent policy 

questions will be addressed. 

I have prepared a letter for your signature to Dr. Newell 

expressing our willingness to cooperate in both areas at 

least to the extent addressed in their request. It also 

Suggests that steps be taken at the working level to prepare necessary work statements, arrange for transfer of 

fund's, and proceed with the task. By separate means, I 

will enlist General King's assistance with contracting and 

related activities. 

2,i ( /7/.)
Exhibit 23.7



LOGO

Consent of Kevin Small

I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of North American Palladium Ltd., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of references to my name and
references to my involvement in the preparation of Technical Report Lac des Iles Mine, Ontario, Incorporating Prefeasibility Study Offset Zone Phase I filed on February 19, 2013 (effective date of January 31, 2013) included in
the 2012 Annual Information Form of North American Palladium Ltd., dated March 20, 2013 (the AIF).

I
also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-13766) and in the Registration Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-185656) of the references to my name and the above-mentioned
information in the AIF.

Dated this 20th day of March, 2013.



|     |  |                              
|---- |  | -----------------------------
|Per: |  | /s/ Kevin Small, P.Eng.      
|     |  |                              
|     |  | Kevin Small, P.Eng.          
|     |  | Director, Technical Services 
|     |  | North American Palladium Ltd.



Royal Bank
Plaza, South Tower, 200 Bay Street, Suite 2350, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 2J2

Tel: (416)
360-7590    Fax: (416) 360-7709

www.nap.com
SUMMARY OF AN OPTION AGREEMENT DATED MAY 28, 2003 BETWEEN MINERA GAVILAN, S.A. DE C.V. (GAVILAN), A WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF THE COMPANY, AND EDUBERTO GARCIA RAMIREZ (GARCIA) FOR THE LOS FRAILES AND POLO PROPERTIES, (THE PROPERTIES) SINALOA STATE, MEXICO



Garcia confirmed he is a Mexican citizen and Gavilan confirmed it is a Mexican corporation in good standing.



Gavilan and Garcia agree to the following terms and conditions:



Garcia agrees to sell 100% of his rights to the Properties under the following terms and conditions:



1)

A total price for 100% is US$150,000, paid as follows:

i)

US$14,000 plus IVA at the moment of signing this agreement

ii)

US$1,000 plus IVA per month for 20 months starting after one month of

signing this agreement

iii)

US$150,000 plus IVA (minus i and ii) on January 31, 2005.



2)

Should the Properties go into commercial production and a 1% net smelter royalty.



Gavilan, or its assigns, may drop its option at any time provided it has met its obligations up to that point in time and the Property is left in good standing.



In case of termination of the agreement, Gavilan must provide all work information (reports, documents, etc.) to Garcia within 60 days after the day of ending this agreement.
\. 

I <( 

I. 

REF ID:A2794131 

/ 

\ .. / 

SUBJECT: Officer Personnel. liutborbed to Sign for Pouch ?Iaterial 

U.S. Navy Communications Station 

TO: 3801 Nebraska Avenue N. W., 

Washington 25, D.C. Attn: AFSA-123 / 

1'he tollow1ng Officer Personnel are cl.earod.and authorized 

to sigri for f/I, US~F, Supplemental Research SrEineh material: 

NAME 

2nd Lt. 

2nd Lt. 

-- I 

A0-1SSS769 

A0-1865686 

~~ PAUL B. Bl:ifJDERSON 

Captain, USAF 

Cbief 1 Receiving and Distribution 

Section 

I 

@'pproved for Release bv NSA on 05-14-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352\3
USCIB: 3.8/4 

7 September 1954 

~ S:&eftl!l'f 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Reorganization ot Canadian COMIN'f Policy Control 

Structure. 

USCIB 3.8/3, dated 30 August 1954. 

Further to the reference, the enclosed memorandum on the above 

subject is forwarded for information. 

Enclpsure 

CANSLO Ref 5-2/91 

dtd 2 Sep 1954. 

USCIB: 3.8/4 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-11-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

TOP SECRET 

24 
• ' 

Memorandum to: 

'l'0P ~!CRE'l' 

Reference: 5-2/91 

2 Sep1;anber, 1954 

Capt. R.L. Taylor, Ex~cutive Secretary, 

USCIB 

PL 86-36/50-USC 3605 

Changes in CAN/US Policz/Liaison 

l. Please be adv.i.sed that· as a result 

of the new terms of reference/recently drawn 'Up for 

the Communications Security/Board (Can), the following 

changes have been ~e: 

(a) Mr. I lorficial title has been changed 

from "Chai:nnan CRC" tc;> Ul)irector or Communications Security. 11 This is an unclassified title and mq be used 

coupled with his name, on all correspondence for Mr. +-f -----. 

(b) We now rega:rd SUSLO(O) as accredited to 

Communications Security Board rather than CRC. Future 

liaison officers should be so accredited. 

2. I understand that a document giving 

d.etails is being .forwarded by SUSLO. 

(Sj med) 

CANS LO 

copy: Director, NSA 

:Enclosure with USCIB J.8/4 dtd 7 Sep 1954. 

TOP SECRET