alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|
|
|
|

|EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories,
Ltd. (Caraco) for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Caraco.
March 11, 2005
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     

| | /s/  Jitendra N. Doshi                             
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Jitendra N. Doshi                                  
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

|1
|-
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 157 

To repeal the medical device tax and the employer and individual responsibility requirements of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 13, 2015 

Mr. CASSIDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To repeal the medical device tax and the employer and individual responsibility requirements of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Obamacare Man5 date Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF MEDICAL DEVICE EXCISE TAX. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 32 of the Internal Rev8 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subchapter E. 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 157 IS

1 (1) Subsection (a) of section 4221 of the Inter2 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

3 the last sentence. 

4 (2) Paragraph (2) of section 6416(b) of such 

5 Code is amended by striking the last sentence. 

6 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sub7 chapter for chapter 32 of the Internal Revenue Code of 

8 1986 is amended by striking the item related to sub9 chapter E. 

10 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply to sales after December 31, 2012. 

12 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIRE13 MENT. 

14 Sections 1501 and 1502 and subsections (a), (b), (c), 

15 and (d) of section 10106 of the Patient Protection and 

16 Affordable Care Act (and the amendments made by such 

17 sections and subsections) are repealed and the Internal 

18 Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied and administered 

19 as if such provisions and amendments had never been en20 acted. 

21 SEC. 4. REPEAL OF EMPLOYER RESPONSIBILITY REQUIRE22 MENT. 

23 Sections 1513 and 1514 and subsections (e), (f), and 

24 (g) of section 10106 of the Patient Protection and Afford25 able Care Act (and the amendments made by such sections 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 157 IS

1 and subsections) are repealed and the Internal Revenue 

2 Code of 1986 shall be applied and administered as if such 

3 provisions and amendments had never been enacted. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
•

THE NRO STAFF

1111111111.

lINATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON, O.C.

BYEMAN

CONTROL SYSI L M

4 October 1974

MEMORANDUM FOR, MR. ROLAND INLOW, COMIREX

SUBJECT: The NRO Relationship to OPICs

With the turn dyer of the CIA U-2 aircraft to the Air Force,

the NRO has entered a new phase in national reconnaissance

operations. The new orientation withdraws the NRO from air

*breathing reconnaissance operations and assigns the collection

systems to the DOD.

The DOD will be tasked to saasfy all nationally directed

aircraft reconnaissance missions following the procedures

followed for the SR-71 GIANT SCALE missions. For several

years, SR-71 aircraft have been flown by SAC and the imagery

processed either by SAC or PACAF. OLYMPIC FIRE U-2 missions

over Cuba have followed the same concept.

As you know, as of 1 July 1974 the NRO withdrew funding

support, which included permanent technical representation and

logistical support, from OPIC-A, OPIC-E and NISC which have

been used principally by the DOD. This decision was based on

the fact that the NRO, per se, did not require the OPICs to

accomplish its satellite imagery processing function.

In the future, we propose that the NRO continue to provide

support as requested from COMIREX along the following lines.

Technical representatives will be available to the three organizations to determine processing status if requested by the

COMIREX. The representatives would also physically assist and

be consultants during an operational mission until the organization is determined to be self sufficient. The technical support

would be provided at no cost to the organizations involved and

RANCH. E VIA

BYEMAN

CON? ROL SYS1LM

•

GIASIPPII.D w MOWN • I maw PROM

ENEMAIANCIASSIFICAlION meows

xacums moan 11162 amarnou tAlli•

0011nY IMP OCCI ►1114s• ON NIP INIT.

ft noLmoBYE13334 - ?,
/SANDIE VIA CI

• 11110041 DILI 06011101110114A+19%1

BYEMAN 00•• 104 INC•110 • 1 0. row I

11111Mohigt 00011a vim 1.110•1.0% cm"

CONTROL SYSTEM

BYEMAN

CONTROL SYSTEM

will be borne by the NRO. In respect to logistical support,.

e.g., film and chemistry, the NRO will provide this type of

support during emergencies on a reimbursable basis which

will be determined at the time of request for such support.

Through the various RAD efforts sponsored by the NRO, to

improve the quality and timeliness of photographic products,

our policy will be to continue to share with all cleared

agencies, any processes and techniques which will enhance

the ability to the intelligence community to assist in the

performance of their assigned tasks.

Request that these arrangements be conveyed to COMIREX

members. Also, it is requested that the OPIC agreement be

modified, accordingly.

HAROLD P. WHEE

Colonel, USAF

Director

cc: DIADC

CONTROL Norn,lank- 74

COPY OE COMS

1.4(1T—rot —2— PAGES
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 124 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 to deauthorize 

the Ten Mile Creek Water Preserve Area Critical Restoration Project. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 8, 2015 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Mr. NELSON) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 

to deauthorize the Ten Mile Creek Water Preserve Area 

Critical Restoration Project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATION. 

4 Section 528(b)(3) of the Water Resources Develop5 ment Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–303; 110 Stat. 3768) 

6 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(E) PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATION.— 

8 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The project identi9 fied as the ‘Ten Mile Creek Water PreVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:14 Jan 15, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S124.IS S124

smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 124 IS

1 serve Area Critical Restoration Project’, 

2 carried out pursuant to this paragraph, 

3 shall no longer be authorized as a Federal 

4 project upon execution of a transfer agree5 ment between the Secretary and the South 

6 Florida Water Management District. 

7 ‘‘(ii) REQUIREMENT.—A transfer 

8 agreement referred to in clause (i) shall re9 quire that the South Florida Water Man10 agement District operate the transferred 

11 project as an environmental restoration 

12 project to provide water storage and water 

13 treatment options.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1456 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1456

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to improve the way 
beneficiaries are assigned under the Medicare shared savings program by 
   also basing such assignment on primary care services furnished by 
    Federally qualified health centers, rural health clinics, nurse 
  practitioners, physician assistants, and clinical nurse specialists.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2015

 Ms. Cantwell (for herself, Mr. Thune, and Mrs. Murray) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to improve the way 
beneficiaries are assigned under the Medicare shared savings program by 
   also basing such assignment on primary care services furnished by 
    Federally qualified health centers, rural health clinics, nurse 
  practitioners, physician assistants, and clinical nurse specialists.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural ACO Improvement Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ASSIGNMENT OF BENEFICIARIES UNDER THE 
              MEDICARE SHARED SAVINGS PROGRAM.

    Section 1899(c) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395jjj(c)) 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``utilization of primary'' and inserting 
        ``utilization of--
            ``(1) in the case of performance years beginning on or 
        after April 1, 2012, primary'';
            (2) in paragraph (1), as added by paragraph (1) of this 
        section, by striking the period at the end and inserting a 
        semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
            ``(2) in the case of performance years beginning on or 
        after January 1, 2016, primary care services provided under 
        this title by an ACO professional described in subsection 
        (h)(1)(B); and
            ``(3) in the case of performance years beginning on or 
        after January 1, 2016, primary care services provided under 
        this title by a Federally qualified health center or rural 
        health clinic (as those terms are defined in section 1861(aa)), 
        as determined by the Secretary.''.
                                 <all>
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

# Current Images

HomeHistoryNational Cryptologic MuseumExhibits & ArtifactsCryptologic MuseumCurrent Exhibits

Search

Search

                              - All Images 
                              - Design Elements 
                              - NSA Historical Photographs 
                              - Other 

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (0.58 MB)

Tags:National Cryptologic Museum, NCM

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
-~850. 

USCIB: 5. 2/94 Hl.iNB;E.E '/IA 6CMIN'i' 0HA:NNm.S ON:OY 

16 May 1955 

'f OP SEeftE'f' 

MD10RANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Revised Agenda for 115th Meeting. 

Reference: USCIB 5.2/92, 9 May 1955. 

1. Since issuance of the reference, two additional matters requiring 

USCIB consideration have arisen. Accordingly, the enclosed revised agenda 

is forwarded as a substitute for the reference. 

2. Attention is invited to the new location for the meeting, which 

is to be held in the Administration Building (fonnerly South Building) 

which is appropriately marked, and adjacent to the building in which previous- meetings have been held. 

Enclosure 

Revised Agenda for 115th Meeting. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-26-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

USCIB: 5.2/94 

TOP SECRET 
USCIB: 5.2/94 M.YTM VIA S9Uilf.P ell:lcNNEffi 6NLY 

'fOP SEeR:Ei' - t::J. S. EH!5 ONLY 

UNITED STATES COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE BOARD 

AGENDA (REVISED) FOR 

One Hundred Fifteenth Meeting at 1030, on Friday, 

20 May 1955, in the Director's Conference Room, 

Administration Building, CIA, Washington, D.C. 

Mr. Allen W. Dulles 1 Chairman 

PART I - AGENDA IT»IS PL 86-36/50 USC 

EO 3. 3 (h) (2) 

3605 

Date of Initial Subjec~ 

Consideration Number Subject Subnitted by 

20 May 1955 5.2/ 1. Approval of Final Minutes Secretariat 

of the 114th Meeting. 

20 May 1955 28.1/ I CIA Member 

20 May 1955 29.20/ 

I I Exec. Secy. 

20 May 1955 9.2/ 4. Alerting Highest Authorities Director, NSA 

(USCIB 9.2/34; 9.2/35). 

All Members are requested to remain after adjournment of the meeting for 

an Executive Session. 

USCIB: 5.2/94 HANBY ~.'IA SCMEN'f 0IIANNmB ONI.¥ 

TOP SECRET 
' . 'f' 

USCIB: 5.2/94 

'PQP SB6m!i'f = l:J.S. Em8 ONtY 

PART II - Backgrol.llld Infonnation on Agenda Items 

EO 3.3(h) (2) 

Item No. Subject and Summary PL ~6-36/50 USC 3605 

l. Final Minutes of the ll4th Meeting. Corrections to the 

tentative version of subject minutes have been receivad and 

circulated to all Members. Final Minutes are now subject to 

Board approval. 

2. 

4. 

I A complete summary of recent developments on this ...._s_u';"""b":'"je-~ct.-.--~1s contained in a memorandum for the Executive 

Secretary from the NSA Member of USCIBEC, distributed as an 

enclosure with USCIB 2$.20/6. USCIB 2$.20/7 forwarded. to all 

members a message from the Secretary, I.SIB which was deemed 

by the Chairman, the NSA, Department of State Members and the 

Executive Secretary to necessitate an immediate interim reply 

pending full consideration by the Board. The Chairman's 

reply to the Chairman, LSIB is.contained in USCIB ':/!J.20/8. 

Alerting Highest Authorities. USCIB 9.2/34 (26 April 1955), 

which ref erred an Intelligence Committee report on this 

subject to USCIBEC for vote sheet action, contains a resum' 

of past actions in this matter. Vote sheet replies to 

USCIB 9.2/34 indicated approval by all members except the 

NSA representative, whose reasons for disapproval, and - request for USCIB consideration, are set forth in USCIB 9.2/35. 

USCIB: 5.2/94 - 2 -

TOP SECRET
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-217-CV

IN RE DAVID LEE CARPENTER, JR.	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

	Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL  A:  GARDNER, J.;  CAYCE, C.J.; and WALKER, J. 

DELIVERED:  June 30, 2008
ce~[-.JJ>,; A661B6 , .,,-11,1ic;;1., 1 1ru .. 

USCIB: 9o4/3 

• 

1.3 April 1954 

e ONf !DENTim=i 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Extension of USCIB Authority to include EI.INT. 

Reference: USCIB 9.4/2 dated 12 April 1954. 

Further to the reference, the following persons have been 

designated to serve on this Working Committee: 

DEPARTMENT 

DEFENSE 

NSA 

ARMY 

NAVY 

AIR FORCE 

CIA 

FBI 

STATE 

REPRESENTATIVE 

Mr. Randolph Zander (Chairman) 

Colonel John J. Davis 

Lt. Colonel Richard Leffers 

Mr. Chester A. I-iall, Jr. (Alternate) 

Captain G. K. Carmichael 

Commander Do R. Howser 

Commander J. L. Holmes 

Commander w. L. Thom.as (Alternate 

for CDR Holmes) 

Lieutenant Jane Misenhelter 

Colonel Charles M. Townsend 

Mr. Ralph Clark 

None designated 

Mr. Robert F. Packard 

Mr. Robert G. Walker (Alternate) 

'"'4 

- ' 

USCIB: 9.4/3 eclassified and approved for release by NSA 

n 09-03-2014 ursuantto E.O. 13526 

CONt=itJel'<i'ff'41.t
**EXHIBIT 99.4**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

 

        In connection with theDecember 31, 2002 Form 10-K of Cornell Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, John L. Hendrix, certify that the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 

 
|   | /s/  John L. Hendrix               |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   | John L. Hendrix, Senior  Vice President |
|   | and Chief Financial  Officer            |
|   | March  31, 2003                         |

 

----
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A0302. AUGUSTUS KING v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS.

Prison inmate Augustus King filed this civil action against the Georgia

Department of Corrections. The trial court entered a directed verdict on behalf of the

defendant. King then appealed directly to this Court.

Because King was incarcerated when he initiated this action, his appeal is

controlled by the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996, OCGA § 42-12-1 et seq.

OCGA § 42-12-8 requires that an appeal of a civil action filed by a prisoner “shall be

as provided in Code Section 5-6-35.” Under OCGA § 5-6-35 (b), the party wishing

to appeal must file an application for discretionary appeal with the appropriate

appellate court. King did not file an application for discretionary appeal in this case,

and his failure to do so deprives this Court of jurisdiction over this direct appeal. See

Jones v. Townsend, 267 Ga. 489, 491 (480 SE2d 24) (1997). Accordingly, this appeal

is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

C l e r k ’ s O f f i c e ,

Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

November 09, 2017

11/09/2017
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our reports
covering the audited historical financial statements of Cabot Industrial Trust,
dated March 27, 1998, Cabot Partners Limited Partnership, dated March 27, 1998,
Existing Investors Property Group, dated July 13, 1998, Prudential Properties
Group, dated July 13, 1998, West Coast Industrial, LLC, dated June 30, 1998,
The 4 B's, dated August 3, 1998, Seefried Properties Group, dated June 30,
1998, Prudential Properties Group II, dated June 30, 1998, DFW Trade Center I,
L.P., Buildings 1, 2 and 3, dated June 30, 1998, 1055 Dornoch Court, San Diego,
CA, dated June 30, 1998, Hampden I and II Properties Group, dated June 30,
1998, South Royal Associates Properties Group, dated June 30, 1998, Joseph A.
Leroy Family LP Property, dated June 30, 1998, Raco/Melaver, L.L.C., dated June
30, 1998, TLI/Cahill Partnership--Spiral Drive, dated June 30, 1998,
Terraden/Ontario, I L.P., dated June 30, 1998, Kojo Building Property Group,
dated June 30, 1998, and Everest Investments Limited Partnership Property
Group, dated July 10, 1998, included in this registration statement of Cabot
Industrial Trust on Form S-11.
 
                                       Arthur Andersen LLP
 
Boston, Massachusetts
August 13, 1998
#### Bloede, Respondent, vs. Lutz, imp., Appellant.

*November 18*—

December *8, 1914.*

*Conveyance in -fraud of creditors: Husband and wife.*

A finding tliat a conveyance oí land by husband to -wife was made in fraud of creditors is *held*to be sustained by the evidence.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Winnebago county: Geo. W. Bueuell, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*David G. Pinherion,*for the appellant.

Eor the respondent there was a brief by *Churchill, Bennett Ghw'chill*and P. *J. Winter,*and oral argument by *W. H. Bennett.*

WmsLow, 0. J.

This is an action in equity brought by a judgment creditor of one Lutz to set aside a deed of certain ■lands made by Lutz to his wife because made in fraud of creditors. The trial court having found upon ample evidence that the deed was made with the fraudulent intent charged on the part of both Lutz and his wife, the judgment must be affirmed.

*By the Court.-*— It is so ordered.