alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004078EN.01054601.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/546 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/546

---

(2004/C 78 E/0577)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3429/03

by Mario Borghezio (NI) to the Commission

(18 November 2003)

Subject:   Eurostat scandal — unanswered questions

Subject:

One of the main criticisms made by the Committee of Wise Men in 1999 and repeated in Parliament's resolution on the postponement of discharge to the Commission in respect of implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 1998 (A5-0087/2000, adopted on 13 April 2000 (1)) and recently stressed by the supervisory bodies dealing with the Eurostat case, referred to the lack of appropriate checks. Was somebody appointed specifically to carry out checks? Is there anyone inside Eurostat who may be considered responsible for the lack of comments made?

1

---

(1)  OJ C 40, 7.2.2001, p. 381.

1

---
~9480 

USCIB: 13. 5/59 

6 May 1954 

90HPIBEiN'i'Iili 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

References: 

Distribution of COMINT Documents. 

(a) USCIB 13.5/33 dated 21 January 1954. 

(b) USCIB 13.5/41 dated 2 March 1954. 

( c) USCIB 13.5/49 dated 12 March 1954. 

24 

l. In order to clarify the present status of the proposal contained 

in reference (a), attention is invited to the following: 

a. Subsequent to USCIBEC consideration of reference (a), USCIB 

was notified (reference (b)) or Executive Committee approval of the 

proposal, except !or the provisions contained in paragraph 6 thereof. 

This decision was reported to USCIB under interregnum. procedure with g 

return deadline of 1700, 12 March 1954. 

b. USCIB met at 1430 on 12 March 1954, at 'Which time the 

Director, NSA, making extra-agenda comment, expressed strong preference 

for reference (a), as originally submitted, over the USCIBEC decision 

deleting paragraph 6. USCIB noted, but did not accept, the Director, 

NSA 1s views (see reference (c)) and ultimately the Director, NSA acceded 

to the majority opinion, which had the effect or approving the USCIBEC 

decision. 

c. Accordingly, reference (b) should be considered approved and 

implementation should go forward. 

USCIB: 13.5/59 

~ UFUS 

t,J~/~ t~ TAyffii{ 

aptain, U~N~vy cutive Secretary, USCIB 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-24-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

GO~'FIBENTML
ex10_3.htm


    
      

    

    Exhibit  10.3

    


    October
1, 2008

    


    


    Martha B.
Steinbock

    cc:
Robert J. Griesbach

    USDA-ARS-OTT

    5601
Sunnyside Avenue

    Beltsville,
MD 20705-5131

    


    


    RE:  Termination
of CRADA 58-3K95-8-1238

    


    Dear Mrs.
Steinbock,

    


    According
to Article 13 of our Cooperative Research and Development Agreement
58-3K95-8-1238 between USDA/ARS and HepaLife Biosystems, Inc., herewith we
provide written notice to terminate the agreement effective November 30,
2008.

    


    We would
like to thank you for the very fruitful R&D cooperation over the last
years.

    


    Please do
not hesitate to contact me if there are further questions.

    


    


    


    Sincerely,

    


    HEPALIFE
BIOSYSTEMS, INC

    


    


    


    /s/
Frank Menzler

    


    Frank Menzler

    Chief
Executive Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

# Year in Review

HomeCybersecurityYear in Review

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Document Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Full Size (0.36 MB)

Tags:NSA Historical Photographs, HIST-002-004

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Prof. G. A. Hedlund 

Department of Mathematics 

Yale University 

New Haven, Connecticut 

Dear Prof. Hedlund: 

REF ID:AJ.i053 

• 

c 0 p y 

24 October 1952 

As you ma:r have heard we are considering having our Symposium 

in C~lifornia again next summer, and we hope 7ou will be able to 

participate. We are now ma.ldng plans and preparations·· for 1;he coming 

year, and would like to have your advice and cooperation. Could you 

come to Washington sometime in the near future to discuss these matters? 

Cairns will be here sometime soon, the date yet to be determined, 

and it would be good if you could be here at the same time. I will 

let you know by letter or phone of the exact time. ' 

In order to pay your travel and reimburse you £or your time it 

will be necessary to protect the taxpayer with some forms. The one 

enclosed will enable us to start action. An extra is enclosed for 

your retention. 

I hope this trip will be possible without ~nterfering·.~exceasively 

with your duties at Yale. It was my intention to make a trip to see you, 

but since Cairns is going to come, it seems better to have our discussions here. 

Sincerely, 

H. H. CAMPAIGN.Ill 

Chief, Mathematical Research Division 

enc: (2) Form 57 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 02-12-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
# CE2004078EN.01084201.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/842 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/842

---

(2004/C 78 E/0895)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3644/03

by Salvador Jové Peres (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(9 December 2003)

Subject:   Reform of the COM in olive oil

Subject:

Following the introduction of production aids for table olives, EU 15 production increased by around 70 %. Given that there are no surpluses and that it is unlikely that consumption would have increased on this scale, the most plausible explanation is that the introduction of production aids has substantially improved transparency in the table olives market.

In the light of the possible abolition of the link with production, to what extent does the Commission feel that there is a danger that transparency will be lost in the table olives and olive oil market? Against this background, how does it assess the risks as regards loss of quality in the olive oil market and the appearance of oils of doubtful origin?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(22 January 2004)

(22 January 2004)

The Commission takes the view that an aid scheme cannot be justified on the sole ground that checks on granting it make it easier to tell production volumes and verify product quality.

We intend to continue fighting lack of market transparency and oil quality fraud using the arrangements already in place, namely the provisions drawn up by the Community on quality standards and testing for authenticity and quality that fall to be applied by the Member States (using their anti-fraud organisations where appropriate) through national programmes to be notified to the Commission. This approach allows oils to be tested from the production stage up to retail sale.

We are also proposing more intensive action programmes for the sector's professional organisations, which should be encouraged to set up traceability, guarantee and inspection schemes for both olive oils and table olives.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 
1999, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial 
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          91,267
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  299,511<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     40,768
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               469,413
<PP&E>                                         378,140
<DEPRECIATION>                                 256,649
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 667,490
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          269,412
<BONDS>                                         59,744
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,736
<OTHER-SE>                                     329,433
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   667,490
<SALES>                                        170,308
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               252,077
<CGS>                                          119,959
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  168,733
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                91,247<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,418
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (17,558)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (17,558)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (17,558)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (   .36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (   .36)
<FN>
<F1>Accounts receivable in the Consolidated Balance Sheet is shown net of
allowances for doubtful accounts.
<F2>Other expenses include Product development expenses, Sales and marketing
expenses, and General and administrative expenses.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Geurts, Respondent, vs. Brost, Appellant.

For the appellant: *James E. Coleman,*attorney, and *William J. McCauley*of counsel, both of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Smith & Smith*of De Pere and *Strehlow & Cranston*and *North, Parker, Bie, Duquaine, Welsh & Trowbridge*of Green Bay.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 10.2
 
 EMULEX CORPORATION
 EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN
 Plan Purpose
   General Plan Description
  Eligibility
  Participation and Term
  Target Bonus Opportunity




---



##### 



Bonus Award Criteria
   Participant Categories1, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7
    
    Participant Category 2Net revenue performance
    
    
    45
    %
    
    
    50
    %Net operating income
    
    
    55
    %
    
    
    50
    %
  1.
    
    The target bonus percentage times the participants quarterly gross base salary equalsthe overall award target.Example:  35% x $25,000 (quarterly salary) = $8,750 target award2.
    
    The weighting factors for net revenue, net operating income, and subjective as stated above
times the overall target award potential give the bonus target for each weighting factor.
 Example:  45%
x $8,750 = $3,938.00 (net revenue target)55% x $8,750 = $4,812.00 (net operating income target)
 3.
    
    An accelerator formula of 1.5 x % of performance less 50% (Category 2 Participants: 2.0 x %
of performance less 100%) will be used for each part of the quantitative bonus award
calculation to reinforce over-achievement opportunity as well as to minimize any bonus
payments for performance below fiscal AOP planned levels.Using the Example if the first quarter performance is 105% of net revenue and 110% of net
income:
 (105% x 1.50) less 50% = 157.5%
 50% = 107.5% of net revenue target:1.075
x $3,938.00 = $4,233.35 net revenue bonus payment(110% x 1.50) less 50% = 165%  50% = 115% of net operating income target:1.15% x $4,812.00 = $5,533.80 net operating income bonus paymentTotal first quarter bonus award for revenue and income = $9,767.15.




---



##### 



(90% x 1.50) less 50% = 135%  50% = 85% of net revenue target:.85 x $3,938.00= $3,347.30 net revenue bonus payment(80% x 1.50) less 50% = 120%  50% = 70% of net operating income target:.70% x $4,812.00 = $3,368.40 net operating income bonus paymentTotal second quarter bonus award for revenue and income = $6,715.70
 4.
    
    Revenue and operating income will be treated as separate bonuses independent of one another
regardless of the award formula. However, a minimum threshold of 80% of the Board of
Directors approved AOP for revenue must be achieved for a revenue bonus payout. Likewise, a
minimum threshold of 80% of the Board of Directors approved AOP for operating income must be
achieved for an operating income payout. No bonus payout of any kind shall be made if
operating income falls below 50% of the AOP approved plan.
 Discretionary Bonuses
  Payment of Awards
   Plan Administration




---



##### 



Plan Term
  Foreign Currency Considerations
  Definitions
 Active Regular Full-time Employee
 Gross Base Salary
 Net Revenue:
 Net Operating Income:
 Termination for Cause:




---



##### 



EMULEX CORPORATION
 EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN
 Approved by Compensation Committee:Date: August 22, 2007Bruce C. EdwardsDate: August 22, 2007Don M. LyleApproved by Executive Chairman:Date: August 22, 2007Paul F. Folino
IN THE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

July 20, 2007

No. 06-2674

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

AMEN E. JUMAH,

Defendant-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Illinois,

Eastern Division.

No. 04 CR 237--John W. Darrah, Judge.

 

ORDER

 

Before RIPPLE, KANNE and SYKES, Circuit Judges.

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. The opinion in this case, entered on July 16, 2007, is

amended as follows: The case citation appearing on pages 17 and 20, is changed from

United States v. Dominguez Rodriguez, 542 U.S. 74, to United States v. Dominguez

Benitez, 542 U.S. 74.
**EXHIBIT
      32**











**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Premier Financial Bancorp, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
      Robert W. Walker and Brien M. Chase, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our
      knowledge:





o
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
                and





o
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








By:
      /s/ Robert W. Walker


---------------------------------------


Robert
      W. Walker


President
      and Chief Executive Officer








By:
      /s/ Brien M. Chase


---------------------------------------


Brien
      M. Chase


Vice
      President and Chief Financial Officer





Date:
      March 30, 2006
# C_2005069EN.01000101.xml

| 19.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/1

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 13 January 2005

in Case C-181/03 P: Albert Nardone, v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Appeal - Former official - Application for invalidity pension - Conditions for granting)

(2005/C 69/01)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-181/03 P: appeal under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, lodged at the Court on 25 April 2003 by Albert Nardone, former official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Piétrain (Belgium), (lawyer: I. Kletzlen), the other party to the proceedings being the Commission of the European Communities (Agent: J. Currall) – the Court (First Chamber), composed of P. Jann, President of the Chamber, A. Rosas, R. Silva de Lapuerta (Rapporteur), S. von Bahr and K. Schiemann, Judges; L.M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 13 January 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mr Nardone to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Nardone to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 158 of 5.7.2003.

1

---
REF ID:A57572 

'FOP SRCR:ET W 

USCIB: 5.3/56 """"lr'Pl"F.I~-~~ 

fOP SBOR:Eft' - e.s. EYl!lB ONLY 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIBEC: 

Subject: Tentative Minutes. 

APPENDED DOC'tM!MYS 60Mf AIN 

SQQ:&'TQRB u.-A'ERIAJ:. 

10 November 1954 

1. Forwarded herewith is a copy of the Tentative Minutes of the 

Nineteenth Meeting of USCIBEC. Please advise the Secretary if a:ny 

changes are desired. 

2. In the event there is no objection to these Minutes on the 

part of USCIBEC members by 26 November 1954 they will be considered 

approved. 

3. THE ENCLOSURE WITH THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION AND SHALL BE HANDLED ONLY IN CHANNELS EXPRESSLY 

PROVIDED FOR COM.INT. 

Enclosure 

1 copy of Tentative Minutes, 

Nineteenth Meeting of USCIBEC. 

USCIB: 5.3/56 

USCIB Papers re1n0ved and :filed 

USCIB: 5.3/55 

29.19/9 

9.3/12 

29.9/7 

6 Dec 54 

~ 

l.PP:ilil':QEJ:> ;QQSUHEN'l'S SON':&UN 

S9B:&'1'GRB M:A'fm!AL 

T0>.0 SECRET 

eclassifi ed and a roved for release b NSA on 11-06-2014 ursuant to E .0. 1352 
. . 

OONli'!m!:M'fiAL - l:l. S. EYES ONt.¥ 

PRESENT: 

DEFENSE: 

STATE: 

FBI: 

NSA: 

fil!: 

ARMY: 

NAVY: 

AIR FORCE: 

SECRETARIAT: 

ALSO PRESENT: 

DEFENSE: 

STATE: 

NSA: 

CIA: 

MINUTES OF THE NINETEENTH MEETING 

OF THE 

USCIB EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 

Captain Rufus L. Taylor, USN, Chairman 

Mr. Philip J. Patton 

(for Mr. William H. Godel) 

Mr. T. Achilles Polyzoides 

Mr. S. D. Ellis 

Captain Dwight M. Agnew, USN 

Lt. Colonel Richard Leffers 

Commander Frederick Welden 

(for Captain William M. McCormick) 

Lt. Colonel Frank J. Harrold, Jr. 

Mr. H. D. Jones 

Mrs. D. O. Tucker 

Mr. Robert E. Drake 

Mr. Robert G. Walker 

Captain J. S. Holtwick, USN 

Mr. Benson K. Buffham 

Mr. Nicholas M. Murphy 

IMr. Frank B. Rowlett 

CO..'JFIDf'J\'TIAL 

OGA 
. . • 

eON!'mEM'l'IAL - l::J.S. EiHlS ON1¥ 

ARMY: 

NAVY: 

AIR FORCE: 

COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN: 

Major John F. 0 1Gara 

Major Robert W. Williams 

Mr. Richard Battey 

Lt. Commander Dora Davis 

Major J. Craig Teller 

Lt. Colonel Henry C. Simmons, USAF 

(Intelligence and Security) 

The Nineteenth Meeting of the United States Communications Intelligence Board Executive Committee was held at 1400 on 21 September 1954, in the Projection Roam, Administration Building, CIA, Washington, 

D.C. 

- 2 -

COJ\'f'IDEP\'TIAL
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub., L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                     Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure (25150).                

*Date and Time:*

April 22, 2015; 09:00 a.m.-5:30 p.m.

April 23, 2015; 8:30 a.m.-1:00 p.m.

*Place:*                     National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230, Room 1235.                

*Type of Meeting:*                     OPEN.                

*Contact Person:*                     Mark Suskin, CISE, Division of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1145, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: 703-292-8970.                

*Minutes:*                     May be obtained from the contact person listed above.                

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     To advise NSF on the impact of its policies, programs and activities in the ACI community. To provide advice to the Director/NSF on issues related to long-range planning.                          ( print page 10165)    

*Agenda:*                     Updates on NSF wide ACI activities.                

Dated: February 19, 2015.

Suzanne Plimpton,

Acting, Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-03869 Filed 2-24-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>
    
       
<S>                      <C>   
<ARTICLE>                5
<CIK>                    0000351385
<NAME>                   ASTRO COMMUNCIATIONS, INC.
<PERIOD-TYPE>            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>        OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>           JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>             APR-30-1997
<CASH>                   161,946
<SECURITIES>             668,250
<RECEIVABLES>            729,951
<ALLOWANCES>             0
<INVENTORY>              799,989
<CURRENT-ASSETS>         2,403,087
<PP&E>                   1,176,856
<DEPRECIATION>           1,038,049
<TOTAL-ASSETS>           6,391,755
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>    852,506
<BONDS>                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>    0
<PREFERRED>              0
<COMMON>                 71,818
<OTHER-SE>               8,333,216
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       6,391,755
<SALES>                  933,687
<TOTAL-REVENUES>         959,239
<CGS>               269,647
<TOTAL-COSTS>       809,614
<OTHER-EXPENSES>    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>     149,625
<INCOME-TAX>        13,523
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 136,102
<DISCONTINUED>      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>     0
<CHANGES>           0
<NET-INCOME>        136,102
<EPS-PRIMARY>       .02
<EPS-DILUTED>       0
        

</TABLE>