alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
"'·~cs~a: r . l1V\l:l\1 ~. 11_N r COMMUtHC/' Tlvt ... I'; HE1\DQUARTERS, 

. OAKLi=_Y. CHELTENHAM. GLOS.. • .f;.~c; 

Tel.: ClfEllf.NHAM 55321. DGC/5730. 

10th ~une, 1955• 

Director, 

National Security Agency. 

-----~------------------~ 

Copy to: Senior United Kingdom Liaison O:t'fic~r. 

_ymSA.Qonference, April 195.5 

I have now considei·ed the repo:rt\ (AAC/55/4- and Appendices dated 

21st April, 1955) rendered to Us jointly\by the U.S. and U.K. delegations 

to the UKUSA Conference on thel I problem which was held. 

at G. c. H. • :f'rom the 18th to 22nd A and. I have taken the 

views of' ioh \as you know was 

represen e 

2. I am glad to be able to inf'orm you of zqy- agreement to and 

·~ 

ratification ot the Conference report and its incorporated recommendations. 

In particular I have approved the specific conclusions and recommendations 

contained in the summaries to Appendices B and 0 of AAC/55/1+1 and have 

directed that a table at actt~ on be drawn uo. on t·.he bas·i···. s ·.of which G. o. H. Q, in consultation as necessary_ ktll take th3 initiative on 

those items requiring implementation by the U.K. As the recommend.a"t;,ions 

concern the day-to-day direction of' production matters rather than future 

planning, I am making the heads of the G.O.H,Q. producti()n.divisioJ:l,s I .... _ __. I respeotively}mresPC>l1B:1.1:>].Etu f'or ~rJ,sutlng that 

the requisite implementing action is being taken. ·PL B6-36/5o use 3605 

EO 3. 3 I h I I 2 I 

3• I confirm that in 11\Y opinion paragraph 4- ot'AAC/55/4- correctly 

states the position, namely that the Conf'erenc~reoonunel'ldAtions contain nothin~ which is contrary to the UKUSA Agr~ement. 

4• I should like to add II\Y appreciation of the part plqed by the 

u.s. delegation in this Conf'erenceand in particular of' Mr. Connelly's 

work in leading them. I run. qiioting the words of the leader of the u. K. 

delegation,! I when I sey that' though the Conference may have 

produced no maJor ne\'V' or startling developments, it nonetheless gave the 

opportunity f'or a most useful ex.chanre of views conf'irmed that for both 

parties the present co-operation is on the right lines, 

produced agreement on a number o.i. vec nica ma era, and refreshed the 

fricndl:i.nesa ana sympatlw oi' the two parties for each other's problemso 

Th;i.::i,I !.'ec1 1 ""'A ..,_ worthwhile attainment and I am grate:f"ul for the u.s. 

:r-'lrt :in e.ch:l t><...-i.nc; :tt. · 

~2P~ 

~TC r~o NrP.r1 o r·~SS150"'0 r11Gf ·~ · ,. _ v o::--

"----A...: o . I 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

.: .... :T6P-:-:SE€.RET . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . - - - - "="' •• 

I 

I ' 

I 

L-= t . 

~. 

~ .. 

[ 

t
. -~-324 

USCIB: 29.19/23 II-MffiH!i '/IA eOMIN'f eff*MNEL6 ONLY 

26 April 1955 

iEO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

TOP 8KSR1!1.£ l~L 86-36/50 USC 3605 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: COMINT Relations with I .... __...__ ............... [ 

Reference: (a.) USCIB 29 .19/19 dated 24/March 1955. 

(b) USCIB 29.19/22 dated 6 Apx-:i..l 19.55. 

1. At its 28th Meeting, on.22 Aprill955, .USCIJ3EC considered reference (a) in light of reference (b) and the discussion at the meeting. 

2. USCIBEC recommends that reference(a.) be approved with the 

understandings reflected in./USCIBEC•s discussion of the matter as recorded 

in the final minutes of the meeting. These understandings are in essence 

as follows: 

a.. Since the question of payment tor the privilege of ma.king a 

site survey has not a.risen in the pa.st, it probS.bly won 1.t a.rise in this 

case. If it should, the matter wolJ.lci have to be considered on its merits 

at the time. Since the Director, NSA would bring such a \contingency to 

the attention of/the Board in the /normal course of events\, there appears 

to be no need to try to provide f'or such a contingency at \this time. 

b. Consideration of the possibility that u.s. requirements 

might be met by U.K.1 )'a.cilities does not prejudio.e in advance 

U.S. pl,ning on this point. Fending the outcome of th.e site survey in I/ the establishment and operation of a. U.S. COMINT installation 

there should be regarded as an integtal pa.rt of the overall plan for 

providing full support to the National CCMINT ef'tort. In this connection, 

the Committee considered it unlikely that.any major portion of the 

projected U.S. requirement fori CCMINT from U.S. bases inl \ I would 

ever be met by U.K.~ lracilities. However, the Committee 

recognized that the pressures of' men. and money render consideration of' such 

a possibility necessary. 

c. The eventuality of' I • I attempting to exact a.s \.price in 

return for U.S. COMINT bases a degree of COMINT collaboration in\ excess 

or that now authorized for I r should not at this point in time be 

judged as warranting an immediate search for alternate sites in o~. 

countries, but rather to warrant increased efforts to obtain from 

an acceptable bargain. USCIBEC agrees that as things now stand qui pro 

quo should not exceed that authorized forl I 

USCIB: 2!7 .19 /23 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-14-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

TOP SECRET 
USCIB: 29 .19/23 

'f'6P B!eftft 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

26 April 1955 

Subject: COMINT Relations with I .... __ ___, 

3. If there is no objection to the above described USCIBEC 

reconunend.ation by the close of business Friday, 6 May 1955, it will be 

considered approved by USCIB under the interregrn.un procedure. 

ptain, • Navy .l!j;lrl~~ive Secretary, USCIB 

USCIB: 29.19/23 - 2 -

TOP SECRET
# CE2004084EN.01033502.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/335 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/335

---

(2004/C 84 E/0395)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0227/04

by Ewa Hedkvist Petersen (PSE) to the Commission

(2 February 2004)

Subject:   Alcohol ignition interlock devices (‘alcolocks’)

Subject:

Trials are now being conducted in some parts of Sweden with ‘alcolocks’ on buses. Does the Commission consider that a Member State can require all vehicles in the country to be fitted with ‘alcolocks’ in order to improve road safety?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(17 March 2004)

(17 March 2004)

If a Member State should decide to make the installation of alcohol ignition interlock devices obligatory, it would have to notify the Commission of the full draft technical regulation as required by the Community rules on the notification of technical regulations. If the measure were then to be considered compatible with Community legislation for vehicles registered in that Member State, the latter would still have to comply with international agreements allowing the circulation of vehicles registered in other States.

Member States have to authorise the sale and first registration of type-approved private cars which are covered by a European certificate of conformity. For other categories of vehicles, particularly public transport vehicles, the Commission has proposed a staggered timetable which is currently being considered by the Council and the Parliament.

The Commission recognises the potential of alcohol ignition interlock devices. At the end of 2003 it launched a study to evaluate the possible applications for such systems. However, at present, given their high cost and the need for frequent recalibration, the Commission considers that such systems should be installed only as an alternative penalty for drink-driving offences, and not as a general measure which, a priori, would only be useful for a small proportion of drivers.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.03

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


         The Board of Directors
         Riviera Electric Construction Co.


We consent to the use in the registration statement of Building One Services
Corporation on Form S-4 of our report dated February 18, 1998, with respect to
the balance sheets of Riviera Electric Construction Co. as of December 31, 1997
and 1996, and related statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash
flows for the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997.



                                                 /s/ Baird, Kurtz & Dobson
                                                 ------------------------------




Denver, Colorado
June 24, 1999
----------------------~---------------~- -

.· 

M~b3BB 

24 

USCIB: 29.19/4 

16 September 1954 

'f OF SE6Riil'f 

MEMQRANDUM FOR THE MEMJ3ERS QF USCWQ: 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

PL66-36/50 USC 3605 

Subject: CO.MINT Arrangements with Third Parties] ___ ___,~ 

Reference: USCIB 29.19/l dated 3 September 1954. 

l. The enclosure, which recommends certain changes in wording f-or 

paragraph ; of the reference, is submitted for consideration by USCIBEC 

at its meeting on 23 September 1954. 

2. This reconnnendation is subnitted by the NSA Member, in accordance 

with his comments on the subject at the l.Sth (Special) Meeting of the 

Committee. 

3. THIS DOCUMENT AND ITS ENCLOOURE COOTAIN CCM-roNIOATICES 

INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION AND SHALL BE HANDLED ONLY IN CHANNEIS EXPRESSLY 

PROVIDED FOR 001.rrNT. 

Enclosure 

a/s. 

USCIB: 29.19/4 

US L.~~"11. 

p'j;ain, u. s. Navy 

outive Secretary, USCIB 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 08-12-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

TOP SECRET 
Rf'§f>liM(jftijfi BB 

ED. 3. 3 ( h) ( 2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

ERQPOSEJ? BJmW:T QF fjRA 5 QF USCIB 29.19/l. 

5. m view/of •the above, it is proposed that USCIB approve the 

following recommendations for a third party~angement between the U.S. 

andl j to be iitj.tialJy negotiated ,9y the Oeptrtl Intelligence 

Agency and conducted~. ;(;fie Geft!Htti eil;e~ii!EJRee A!e&~ee ~e- i'Keell4i:i:¥e 

~~in aggomance w:l,th policies as detem'.iMd 0 USCIB: ... a. Theu.s. Will i'urnish limited assistance to the 

.....__ _____ __, in the form of cash subsidies, D/F and "releasable" 

intercept equipment, guidance in station design, equipment installation 

and maintenance, location or inte:i;"cept stations, organization, and mm: 

.__ ______ _.f ~llM:illg °laB!lta!~ ~B:l:B! if neeeee~ a -Aa Jml&e•ia:le 

w!3:3: :t=aa wi~ift 4me ~erri:aiena el} ,.~rm '7 t.!'J'e!'Hii!r; ~ el ~ ~ 

•ee!leMw 

c. In view of the possibility that UKUSA-operated intercept 

activities ma:y be mounted ~,___ __ ___,~ and that\questions might then arise 

of technical "quid pro quo,11 provisions of u.s. assistance noted above 

'Will be limited to the minimum required to obtain I I agreetD.ent 

to provide their intercepts, and to insure that the material obtained 

is or suitable quality. 

d. In accord.a.nee with paragraphs 6 and 7 of the basic UKUSA 

agreement, approval of LSIB for the exchange proposed in subparagraphs 

a and b ab.ave should be obtained prior to any further discussions with 

L...-___ __,f of.fioiala. 

'fOP SECRET
COPY REF ID:A57395 

-8oNFIOE;NTl.!Lo 

25 November 1953 

Dear Tommy, 

I have noted with interest your letter of 12 October on the 

subject of' Interim Report #1678 issued by the Special Processing 

Division (NSA-72. As a matter of inf'ormation f'or both of' us, I 

have had your report looked into quite carefully. 

You are correct in your determination that this is an elementary course in cryptanalysis. It is designed specifically for 

internal use within NSA-72 to provide additional instruction to personnel from the Training School entering into work with NSA-72. The 

examples given are specifically directed toward the Russian Problem 

to give more specific direction to training inco.!lling personnel. 

When the report was completed, it appe.ared that this type of 

material would be valuable f'or overseas installations which had a 

similar ;problem. At that time, it was coordinated with the Training 

Division who suggested that it be sent to the Field. It was received with considerable praise from European contacts, and ASAE has 

requested 300 additional copies. 

The document has now been taken over by the Training Division 

who is doing some additional work on it prior to its publication in 

quantity. I hope, with the above information, you will re.:.read it 

with a view toward using its more valuable attributes to our advantage in the Pacific areas. 

Captain Thomas H. Dyer, USN 

Chief, NSA-Far East 

APO 500, c/o Postmaster 

San Francisco, California 

Sincerely 

Is I RAIPH J. CANINE 

RA.IPR J. CANINE 

Lieutenant General, US Army 

Director 

CC>NFIOENTIA~
exv10w56






Exhibit 10.56




AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO THE

PATRIOT RISK MANAGEMENT, INC. 2008 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN



RESOLVED, that Sections 5(a) and (b) of the Patriot Risk Management, Inc. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan
be and they hereby are revised to read as follows:





(a) General Limitations. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 17 of the
Plan, the maximum number of Shares reserved for issuance in connection with Awards under the
Plan is 1,568,100 Shares. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 17 of the Plan, the
maximum number of Shares reserved for issuance as Incentive Stock Options under the Plan is
1,568,100 Shares.




(b) Individual Limitations. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 17 of the
Plan:




	 	(i)	 	the maximum number of Shares with respect to which Options and
Stock Appreciation Rights may be granted to any individual during any one
calendar year is 800,000 Shares; and
	 
	 	(ii)	 	in no event may Qualified Performance-Based Awards be granted
to a single Participant in any 12-month period (i) in respect of more than
800,000 Shares (if the Award is denominated in Shares) or (ii) having a maximum
payment with a value greater than $1,500,000 (if the Award is denominated in
other than Shares).
# CE2004084EN.01018901.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/189 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/189

---

(2004/C 84 E/0229)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0262/04

by Graham Watson (ELDR) to the Commission

(3 February 2004)

Subject:   Sewage treatment plants

Subject:

In the sewage treatment sector, companies wishing to sell equipment to the Republic of Ireland require approval of their products by the Irish Board of Agreement. Would the Commission agree that the cost of obtaining such approval is a barrier to trade?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(9 March 2004)

(9 March 2004)

The Honourable Member did not specify which type of sewage treatment equipment has to be approved by the Irish Board of Agreement. Therefore, it is difficult to assess whether the equipment falls within the scope of Directive 98/37/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 relating to machinery (1) or within the scope of any other Community Directive ensuring the free movement of the relevant equipment. It is also difficult to assess whether the equipment is covered by Article 4 (2) of Council Directive 89/106/CEE of 21 December 1988, on construction products (2). If so, the approval scheme should be examined in the light of the relevant directive. Approval by the Irish Board of Agreement of products relating to pertinent requirements already regulated at Community level is not allowed.

1

2

If, however, such equipment would fall outside the scope of the relevant directive(s) or if the pertinent requirements are not regulated in the relevant directive(s), the requirement to submit these products for approval to the Irish Board of Agreement should be assessed in the light of Articles 28 to 30 of the EC Treaty. Article 28 of the EC Treaty prohibits measures having an effect equivalent to quantitative import restrictions, and covers all commercial rules enacted by the Member States which are capable of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, intra-Community trade. However, these trade restrictions could be justified under Article 30 of the EC Treaty or under the mandatory requirements accepted by the Court of Justice, if these restrictions are necessary and proportionate to achieve the legitimate objectives of public interest set out in Article 30 or accepted by the Court of Justice.

---

(1)  OJ L 207, 23.7.1998.

1

(2)  OJ L 40, 11.2.1989.

2

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 39 (Friday, February 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 10702]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04053]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; Bioreactor Technology.
    Date: March 17, 2015.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20817.
    Contact Person: Kristin Goltry, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7198, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-435-0297, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#73141c1f07010a181f331e121a1f5d1d1a1b5d141c05"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="197e76756d6b607275597478707537777071377e766f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; Bioreactor Technology.
    Date: March 17, 2015.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20817.
    Contact Person: Kristin Goltry, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7198, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-435-0297, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#15727a7961676c7e795578747c793b7b7c7d3b727a63"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2d4a4241595f5446416d404c444103434445034a425b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 23, 2015.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-04053 Filed 2-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.3.1
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS'
 
We consent to the inclusion in this registration statement of Cabot Industrial
Trust on Form S-11 of our report dated July 1, 1998 on our audits of the his-
torical cost basis combined financial statements of Orlando Central Park and
500 Memorial Drive as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 1997. We also consent to the reference
to our firm under the caption "Experts."
 
                                       PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
New York, New York
August 14, 1998
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 3 - 0626 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 -NM - 1 80 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
/ .. . .-

te 

USCIB: 13 .1/11 

SBeRBl' 

~65912._._ 

r 

18 July 1955 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: COMINT Personnel Security Standards and Practices. 

Reference: USCIB 13.1/10 dated 29 June 1955. 

1. No objection having been received to the reference, the amendments to USCIB 1).1/8 contained therein are considered approved. 

2. In view ot this decision, the action indicated in paragraph 5 

ot the reference has been taken by this office. 

3. For your information there is enclosed herewith a roster of the 

committee members appointed by the various member agencies of the Board. 

Enclosure 

a/s 

USCIB: 13.1/11 

USCIB 

Sf!CRE,. 

eclassifi ed and a roved for release b NSA on 09-11-2014 ursuant to E .0. 1352 

l'i II 

'- ~ 
. " 

MEMBERSHIP ROSTER 

SPECIAL COMMITTEE OF USCIB 

ON 

CCMINT PERSONNEL SECURITYSTANDARDS AND PRACTICE'S 

Mr. Jerome D. Fenton, OSD, Chairman 

NAME LOCATION ROCM TELEPHONE 

STATE 

Mr. Dennis A. Flinn State Annex #ll 520 Code 191 X4176 

(Alt: Mr. otto F. otepka) State Annex #11 621 Code 191 X2120 

DEFENSE 

Mr. Jerome D. Fenton Pentagon 3D939 Code 131 X7S233 

FBI 

-

Mr. S. D. Ellis Dept. of Justice 7645 Code 175 X2022 

~ 

Mr. S. Wesley Reynolds Naval Security Sta. 17-101 Code 131 X60261 

!!i! 

Brig.Gen. H. o. Paxson Pentagon 2E474 Code 131 X72577 

NAVY 

-

RAIM R. H. Rice Pentagon 5C560 Code 131 X52543 

(Alt: CDR Willis L. Thomas) Arlington Hall Sta. 1401 "B" Code 147 X341 

AIR FORCE 

Brig.Gen. :Edgar A. Sirmeyer,Jr. AFSS Kelly AFB, (Contact Code 131 X74675 

Texas Capt.Miller) (Alt: Col. C. C. Rogers) Pentagon 4A924 Code 131 X56548 

CIA 

-

Col.. Sheffield Edwards Tempo 11E'YE11 2060 Code 143 X645 

USCIB 

Maj. William R. Culmer, USA Tempo 11QUE" 2054 Code 143 X3065 

COf..'FIDENTIAL