|  |
|--|
|  |
|  |

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

**FORM 10-Q**

****

(Mark One)

**[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004

OR

**[   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

For the transition period from _____ to _____

Commission file number 0-9722
| **INTERGRAPH CORPORATION**                                                                   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)                                       |
|                                                                                         |
| **Delaware**                                                                                 |   | **63-0573222** |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)                               |   | I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No. |
|                                                                                         |
| **Huntsville, Alabama  35894-0001** (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) |
|                                                                                         |
| **(256) 730-2000**                                                                           |
| (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)                                         |

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes    X     No ___

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes    X     No ___

Common stock, par value $0.10 per share:  36,516,049 sharesoutstanding as of March 31, 2004

        
|  |
|--|
|  |
|  |

**INTERGRAPH CORPORATION****FORM 10-Q*****March 31, 2004**

 

| INDEX          |
|----------------|
|           |  |  |  |
|                |  |  |  |
|                |  |  | Page No. |
|           |  |  |  |
| **PART I.**    | **FINANCIAL INFORMATION** |  |
|                |  |  |
|                | Item 1. | Financial Statements |  |
|           |  |  |  |
|                | Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2004, and |  |
|                |  | December 31, 2003 | 2 |
|           |  |  |  |
|                | Consolidated Statements of Income for the quarters |  |
|                |  | ended March 31, 2004, and 2003 | 3 |
|           |  |  |  |
|                | Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the quarters |  |
|                |  | ended March 31, 2004, and 2003 | 4 |
|           |  |  |  |
|                | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 5-13 |
|           |  |  |  |
|                | Item 2. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition |  |
|                |  | and Results of Operations | 13-18 |
|           |  |  |  |
|                | Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 18-19 |
|           |  |  |  |
|                | Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 19 |
|           |  |  |  |
|           |  |  |  |
| **PART II.**   | **OTHER INFORMATION** |  |
|           |  |  |  |
|                | Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | 19-21 |
|           |  |  |  |
|                | Item 6. | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K | 21-22 |
|           |  |  |  |
|           |  |  |  |
| **SIGNATURES** |  | 22 |

* Information contained in this Form 10-Q includes statements that are forward-looking as defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements is described in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its most recent Annual Report on Form 10-Kand this Form 10-Q.
                       

**PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION**

****

**Item 1.   Financial Statements**

****

**INTERGRAPH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS(Unaudited)**

***March 31,***

*December 31,*

***2004***

*2003*

*(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)*
 
***Assets***

Cash and cash equivalents

**$**

**  250,504  **

$

265,782

Accounts receivable, net

**146,340**

150,927

Inventories, net

**  15,459**

  15,443

Current receivable, intellectual property settlement

**200,000**

        ---

Other current assets

**  37,599**

  37,673

***Total current assets***

**649,902**

469,825

Investments in affiliates

**   9,499**

    9,499

Capitalized software development costs, net

**  28,839**

  29,520

Noncurrent receivable, intellectual property settlement

**  25,000**

        ---

Other assets, net

**  12,504**

  12,500

Property, plant, and equipment, net

**  51,845**

  51,099

***Total Assets***

**$**

**777,589**

$

572,443
 
***Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity***

Trade accounts payable

**$**

**  17,249**

$

  23,052

Accrued compensation

**  32,663**

  38,781

Other accrued expenses

**  49,707**

  40,855

Billings in excess of sales

**  49,532**

  48,711

Income taxes payable

**  98,700**

  27,177

***Total current liabilities***

**247,851**

178,576

Deferred income taxes

**  12,982**

  13,465

Other noncurrent liabilities

**    1,669**

       548

***Total noncurrent liabilities***

**  14,651**

  14,013

***Shareholders' equity:***

Common stock, par value $0.10 per share - 100,000,000

  shares authorized; 57,361,362 shares issued

**     5,736**

    5,736

Additional paid-in capital

**  199,183**

201,240

Deferred compensation

**      (6,622)**

    (1,552)

Retained earnings

**  745,219**

609,227

Accumulated other comprehensive income

**    10,491**

  12,790

**  954,007**

827,441

Less - cost of treasury shares (20,845,313 at March 31, 2004,

  and 21,259,223 at December 31, 2003)

**  (438,920)**

(447,587)

***Total shareholders' equity***

**  515,087**

379,854

***Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity***

**$**

**  777,589**

$

572,443

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

**INTERGRAPH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME(Unaudited)**

***Quarter Ended March 31,***

***2004***

*2003*

*(In thousands, except per share amounts)*
 
***Revenues***

Systems

**$**

**    70,379**

$

  70,406

Maintenance

**    33,003**

  30,057

Services

**    29,587**

  20,090

***Total revenues***

**  132,969**

120,553
 
***Cost of revenues***

Systems

**   34,347**

  36,460

Maintenance

**   10,484**

  12,296

Services

**   21,027**

  15,196

***Total cost of revenues***

**   65,858**

  63,952
 
***Gross profit***

**   67,111**

  56,601
 
***Operating expenses***

     

Product development

**   14,564**

  11,872

Sales and marketing

**   26,081**

  24,677

General and administrative

**   17,461**

  15,817

Restructuring charges

**       826**

       ---

***Total operating expenses***

**   58,932**

  52,366
 
***Income from operations***

**    8,179**

    4,235
 
Intellectual property income, net

**203,060**

   5,330

Gain on sale of assets

**        ---**

   1,220

Interest income

**        881**

    1,923

Other income (expense), net

**     1,072**

        (43)
 
***Income before income taxes***

** 213,192**

12,665
 
Income tax expense

**   (77,200)**

  (4,550)
 
***Net income***

**$**

** 135,992**

$

  8,115
 
Net income per share - basic

**$**

**      3.75**

$

   0.18

      - diluted

**$**

**      3.59**

$

   0.17

Weighted average shares outstanding - basic

**  36,268**

46,200

            - diluted

**  37,843**

48,408

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

**INTERGRAPH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS(Unaudited)**

***Quarter Ended March 31,***

***2004***

*2003*

*(In thousands)*
 
***Cash Provided By (Used For):***

***Operating Activities:***

Net income

**$**

**  135,992**

$

  8,115

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash

 used for operating activities:

Depreciation

**    2,228**

   2,018

 

Amortization

**     5,038**

   3,706

Provisions for losses on accounts receivable

**        829**

      334

Noncurrent portion of deferred taxes

**        (477)**

     157

Income taxes payable

**   71,564**

(31,813)

Gain on sale of assets

**        ---**

  (1,220)

Current receivable, intellectual property settlements

**  (200,000)**

  (5,000)

Noncurrent receivable, intellectual property settlement

**   (25,000)**

      ---

Net changes in other assets and liabilities

**     3,781**

     892

***Net cash used for operating activities***

** **

**     (6,045)**

(22,811)
 
***Investing Activities:***

Net proceeds from sales of assets

**        125**

  3,243

Purchases of property, plant, and equipment

**     (2,210)**

  (2,172)

Purchases of short-term investments

**         ---**

     (902)

Proceeds from maturities of short-term investments

**         ---**

15,991

Capitalized software development costs

**     (2,595)**

  (2,909)

Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired

**        (600)**

  (1,940)

Other

**     (1,821)**

     (472)

***Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities***

**     (7,101)**

10,839
 
***Financing Activities:***

Borrowings

**         ---**

        31

Debt repayment

**         ---**

      (200)

Treasury stock repurchase and payment of tender offer expenses

**    (1,866)**

   (4,617)

Proceeds of employee stock purchases and exercises of

stock options

**     1,324**

    1,421

***Net cash used for financing activities***

**        (542)**

    (3,365)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

**     (1,590)**

       (237)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

**   (15,278)**

  (15,574)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

**  265,782**

490,097

***Cash and cash equivalents at end of period***

**$**

**  250,504**

$

474,523

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
****
**INTERGRAPH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES****NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS**

** **

**NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION**

The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Intergraph Corporation (the "Company" or "Intergraph") and its majority-owned subsidiaries.  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated inconsolidation.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring items) necessary for a fair presentation of results for the interim periods presented.  These unaudited interimfinancial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 ("2003 Annual Report").

The operating results for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2004.

The Company's operations are divided for operational and management purposes into four separate business segments, along with a Corporate oversight function ("Corporate"):  Intergraph Process, Power & Offshore ("PPO"), Intergraph Mapping and GeospatialSolutions ("IMGS"), Intergraph Solutions Group ("ISG"), and Intergraph Public Safety, Inc. ("IPS").  See Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Form 10-Q for a description of these business segments.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior-year amounts to provide comparability with the current-year presentation. 

**NOTE 2 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION**

In accordance with the disclosure provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," the Company has elected to apply Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued toEmployees," and related Interpretations in accounting for its stock-based option plans.  Accordingly, the Company recognized no compensation expense for these plans during the quarters ended March 31, 2004, and 2003.  Had the Company accounted for itsstock-based compensation plans based on the fair value of awards at grant date consistent with the methodology of SFAS 123, the Company's reported net income and income per share for these periods would have been impacted as indicated below.  The effect ofapplying SFAS 123 on a pro forma basis for the quarters ended March 31, 2004, and 2003, are not likely to be representative of the effects on reported pro forma net income for future periods as options vest over several years, and it is anticipated that additionalgrants will be made in future years.

***Quarter Ended March 31,***

***2004***

*2003*

*(In thousands, except per share amounts)*
 
Net income

As reported

**$**

**135,992**

$

8,115

Deduct:  Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined

  under fair-value-based method for all awards (net of income tax)

**       (358)**

   (324)

Pro forma

**$**

**135,634**

$

7,791
 
Basic income per share

As reported

**$**

**     3.75**

$

  0.18

Pro forma

**$**

**     3.74**

$

  0.17
 
Diluted income per share

As reported

**$**

**     3.59**

$

  0.17

Pro forma

**$**

**     3.58**

$

  0.16

For the quarter ended March 31, 2004, the Company issued 258,000 shares of restricted stock, which was recorded at the quoted market price at the date of grant.  The total of all restricted stock issued as of March 31, 2004, was 333,000 shares.  The costof the restricted stock is being amortized over a period of 4 years.  The amortization expense for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, was $217,000.  

**NOTE 3 - INVENTORIES**

Inventories at March 31, 2004, and December 31, 2003, are summarized as follows:

***March 31,***

*December 31,*

***2004***

*2003*

*(In thousands)*
 
Raw materials

**$**

**  4,986**

$

  6,295

Work-in-process

**  4,411**

  3,538

Finished goods

**  3,294**

  2,939

Service spares

**  2,768**

  2,671

Totals

**$**

**15,459**

$

15,443

Inventories on hand at March 31, 2004, and December 31, 2003, relate primarily to continuing specialized hardware assembly activity in the Company's IMGS and ISG business segments, and to the Company's continuing warranty and maintenance obligations on computerhardware previously sold.  Amounts reflected as work-in-process relate to sales contracts accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method.

**NOTE 4 - CAPITALIZED SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COSTS**

Product development costs are charged to expense as incurred; however, the costs incurred for the development of computer software that will be sold, leased, or otherwise marketed are capitalized when technological feasibility of the product has beenestablished.  Such capitalized costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of two to seven years.  Amortization of these capitalized costs, included in "Cost of revenues - Systems" in the consolidated statements of income, amounted to $3.3million in first quarter 2004 compared to $2 million in first quarter 2003.  Due to net realizable value concerns, the Company did not capitalize product development expenses of $2.9 million in first quarter 2003 for costs otherwise eligible forcapitalization.  See Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Form 10-Q for further information regarding capitalized software development costs and accumulated amortization.
****
**NOTE 5 - INTANGIBLE ASSETS**

The Company's intangible assets include capitalized software development costs (included as a separate line in the consolidated balance sheets) and other intangible assets (included in "Other assets, net" in the consolidated balance sheets).

At March 31, 2004, and December 31, 2003, the Company's intangible assets and related accumulated amortization consisted of the following:

***March 31, 2004***

*December 31, 2003*

***Accumulated***

*Accumulated*

***Gross***

***Amortization***

***Net***

*Gross*

*Amortization*

*Net*

*(In thousands)*
 
Capitalized software   development

**$**

**  57,018**

**$**

**(28,179)**

**$**

**28,839**

$

  54,423

$

(24,903)

$

29,520

Other intangible assets

**  48,866**

**(41,456)**

**  7,410**

  48,011

(39,694)

  8,317

Totals

**$**

**105,884**

**$**

**(69,635)**

**$**

**36,249**

$

102,434

$

(64,597)

$

37,837

The Company recorded amortization expense of $5 million and $3.7 million for first quarter 2004 and 2003, respectively.  Based on the current intangible assets subject to amortization, the estimated amortization expenses for the remainder of 2004, each of thesucceeding five years, and thereafter is as follows: $15 million in 2004, $8 million in 2005, $3 million in 2006, $3 million in 2007, $3 million in 2008, $3 million in 2009, and $1 million thereafter.  The estimated amortization expenses do not include anyamounts for capitalized software development costs incurred or any intangible assets added after March 31, 2004. 

**NOTE 6 - PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT, NET**

Property, plant, and equipment, net includes accumulated depreciation of approximately $103.5 million and $102.2 million at March 31, 2004, and December 31, 2003, respectively.

**NOTE 7 - SUPPLEMENTARY CASH FLOW INFORMATION**

Changes in other assets and liabilities less cash, net of the effects of business acquisitions and divestitures, in reconciling net income to net cash used for operations are as follows:

***Quarter Ended March 31,***

***2004***

*2003*

*(In thousands)*
 
(Increase) decrease in:

Accounts receivable, net

**$**

**  2,080**

$

  2,988

Inventories, net

**     (943)**

  1,290

Other assets and liabilities

**  2,103**

     (791)

Increase (decrease) in:

Trade accounts payable

**  (5,690)**

  (1,393)

Accrued compensation and other accrued expenses

**  5,722**

  (2,923)

Refundable income taxes

**     (874)**

       (10)

Billings in excess of sales

**  1,383**

  1,731

Net changes in other assets and liabilities

**$**

**  3,781**

$

     892

There were no significant non-cash investing and financing transactions in first quarter 2004 or first quarter 2003.

****
****
**NOTE 8 - EARNINGS PER SHARE**

Basic income per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.  Diluted income per share is computed using the weighted average number of common and equivalent common shares outstanding.  Employee stock options are theCompany's only common stock equivalent and are included in the calculation only if dilutive.  For the quarters ended March 31, 2004, and 2003, these dilutive common stock equivalents were 1,575,000 and 2,208,000, respectively. 

**NOTE 9 - COMPREHENSIVE INCOME**

Comprehensive income differs from net income due to non-equity items that include unrealized gains and losses on certain investments in debt and equity securities and foreign currency translation adjustments.

Comprehensive income is as follows:

***Quarter Ended March 31,***

***2004***

*2003*

*(In thousands)*
 
Net income

**$**

**135,992**

$

8,115

Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period

**        27**

(1,026)

Translation adjustment for financial statements denominated in a foreign currency

**   (2,328)**

   293

Comprehensive income

**$**

**133,691**

$

7,382

There was no income tax effect related to the items included in other comprehensive income for first quarter 2004.  Unrealized holding gains (losses) are shown net of $537,000 of income taxes for first quarter 2003.

**NOTE 10 - RESTRUCTURING CHARGES**

****

In first quarter 2004, the Company recorded $826,000 in restructuring costs for employee severance and operating lease terminations in an effort to realign costs with revenues primarily in the Company's PPO business segment.  These expenses are reflected in"Restructuring charges" in the consolidated statements of income.  All restructuring activities were completed by March 31, 2004.  One-time severance benefits totaled $819,000, of which $746,000 was paid prior to March 31, 2004.  Lease terminationcosts totaled $7,000, of which $4,000 was paid prior to March 31, 2004.  At March 31, 2004, the total remaining accrued liability for 2004 restructuring was $73,000 and is reflected in "Other accrued expenses" in the Company's consolidated balancesheets.   

In fourth quarter 2003, the Company recorded $4 million in restructuring charges in an effort to realign costs with revenues in certain areas of the Company's business.  The Corporate business segment recorded $2.5 million in restructuring expenses foremployee severance and operating lease terminations.  The IMGS business segment recorded $1.5 million in restructuring expenses for employee severance.  All restructuring activities were completed by December 31, 2003.  One-time severance benefitstotaled $2.9 million, of which $432,000 was paid prior to December 31, 2003, and of which $1.7 million was paid in first quarter 2004.  Lease termination costs totaled $1 million, and other associated costs were $23,000, of which $323,000 was paid in firstquarter 2004.  At March 31, 2004, the total remaining accrued liability for 2003 restructuring was $1.4 million compared to approximately $3.5 million at December 31, 2003, and is reflected in "Other accrued expenses" in the Company's consolidated balancesheets.

In fourth quarter 2002, the Company record $2.1 million in restructuring charges as a result of combining the Utilities and Communications business with the IMGS division.  Cash outlays related to these actions approximated $31,000 in first quarter 2004, and$1.1 million in first quarter 2003.  At March 31, 2004, the total remaining accrued liability for restructuring was approximately $90,000 compared to approximately $119,000 at December 31, 2003.  These liabilities are reflected in "Other accrued expenses"in the Company's consolidated balance sheets.  These accrued costs are expected to be paid during 2004 and relate to liabilities for idle building space in Asia. 

For a complete discussion of the Company's restructuring activities in 2003 and 2002, see the Company's 2003 Annual Report.

****

**NOTE 11 - INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INCOME, NET**

In first quarter 2004, net intellectual property income of $203.1 million included $225 million in income from the Company's settlement with Intel Corporation ("Intel") and Dell Inc.TM ("Dell"), offset by $21.9 million in legal fees and other related expensesassociated with patent litigation.  A payment of $125 million was received on April 5, 2004, and the balance will be received in four quarterly installments over the following year.  In first quarter 2003, the Company recorded $10 million in income fromInternational Business Machines Corporation ("IBM") as a balancing payment for future royalties in a full cross-licensing agreement that also resolved all outstanding patent infringement claims between IBM and the Company.  A payment of $5 million was receivedin first quarter 2003, and the remainder was received in second quarter 2003.  Netted against this income were $4.7 million in legal fees and other related expenses associated with protecting and licensing the Company's intellectual property.  For acomplete discussion of litigation matters, see Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and "Intellectual Property" in the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") section contained in this Form10-Q.

****

**NOTE 12 - GAIN ON SALE OF ASSETS**

In first quarter 2003, the Company reported a gain of $1.2 million from the March 2003 sale of its aeronautical intellectual property assets to Ingegneria Dei Sistemi S.p.A. in Rome, Italy.  

**NOTE 13 - SEGMENT REPORTING**

The Company's current operations are divided into four business segments along with a Corporate oversight function.  The four core business segments are PPO, IMGS, ISG, and IPS.  The Company's reportable segments are strategic business units that areorganized by the types of products sold and the specific markets served.  Each is discussed in further detail below.

PPO supplies integrated lifecycle software solutions for the design, construction, and operation of process and power plants, offshore rigs, and ships.  This division offers applications that span shipbuilding, plant design and visualization, materialsprocurement and management, plant operations, and engineering information management.

IMGS is a geospatial solutions provider for the following markets:  local, regional, federal, and national governments; transportation; utilities; communications; commercial remote sensing and photogrammetry; and military and intelligence. 

ISG provides professional services, specially developed software and hardware, and commercial off-the-shelf products to federal, state, and local governments, and to commercial customers.

IPS develops computer graphics-based systems designed for public safety agencies, commercial fleet operations, campus, military base, and airport security.  IPS systems are complete, integrated solutions for command and control, deployment, tracking, information gathering, analysis, and records management.

The Corporate segment includes revenues and costs for Teranetix (a provider of commercial repair and logistics services), international hardware maintenance, and general Corporate functions.  Operating expenses for Corporate consist of oversight costs associatedwith the offices of Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Strategic Planning, General Counsel, the Board of Directors, internal and external audit, other costs that are directly the result of Intergraph being a publicly held company, andresidual costs of exiting the hardware business, including management of warranty reserves and a repair depot.

The Company evaluates the performance of its business segments based on revenue and income (loss) from operations.  The accounting policies of the reportable segments are consistent across segments and are the same as those used in preparation of theconsolidated financial statements of the Company (see Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company's 2003 Annual Report).  Sales between the business segments are accounted for under a transfer pricing policy.  Transferprices approximate prices that would be charged for the same or similar products and services to unrelated buyers.

The following table sets forth revenues and operating income (loss) by business segment for the quarters ended March 31, 2004, and 2003.

 

***Quarter Ended March 31,***

***2004***

*2003*

*(In thousands)*
 
**Revenues:**

PPO:

Unaffiliated customers

**$**

**  33,352**

$

  29,795

Intersegment revenues

**       378**

       717

**  33,730**

  30,512

IMGS:

Unaffiliated customers

**  50,824**

  45,120

Intersegment revenues

**    1,190**

    1,643

**  52,014**

  46,763

ISG:

Unaffiliated customers

**  29,620**

  26,975

Intersegment revenues

**       475**

       502

**  30,095**

  27,477

IPS:

Unaffiliated customers

**  16,565**

  15,983

Intersegment revenues

**       367**

       541

**  16,932**

  16,524

Corporate:

Unaffiliated customers

**    2,608**

    2,680

Intersegment revenues

**       233**

       789

**    2,841**

    3,469

**135,612**

124,745

Eliminations

**    (2,643)**

    (4,192)

Total Revenues

**$**

**132,969**

$

120,553
 
**Operating income (loss):**

PPO

**$**

**   3,313**

$

    4,169

IMGS

**   3,666**

       186

ISG

**   3,831**

     1,136

IPS

**   2,096**

    3,469

Corporate

**  (4,727)**

    (4,725)

Eliminations

**      ---**

       ---

Total

**$**

**  8,179**

$

    4,235

Significant profit and loss items that were not allocated to the segments and not included in the analysis above include intellectual property income and expense and gains and losses on sales of assets.  See Notes 11 and 12 of Notes to Consolidated FinancialStatements contained in this Form 10-Q for comparative details of these items.

The Company does not evaluate performance or allocate resources based on assets.  For further information, see "Results by Operating Segment" in MD&A.

****

**NOTE 14 - LETTERS OF CREDIT**

In September 2002, in order to reduce the cost of issuing letters of credit, the Company established a $12.5 million credit line with Wells Fargo Bank to cover its outstanding letters of credit secured by $15 million of interest-bearing securities.  Thiscredit line was reduced on January 20, 2004, to $6 million secured by $8.2 million of interest-bearing securities.   Under this arrangement, the Company earns interest on the securities and withdrawal of securities is allowed, but the Company is required tomaintain a level of securities sufficient to cover total outstanding letters of credit (which totaled $4.9 million at March 31, 2004, and December 31, 2003).

**NOTE 15 - RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS**

****

In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Interpretation ("FIN") No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities," (revised December 2003), an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin 51, "Consolidation of FinancialStatements," which addresses consolidation of variable interest entities ("VIEs") by business enterprises.  This statement is required in financial statements of public entities that have interests in VIEs or potential VIEs commonly referred to asspecial-purpose entities for periods ending after December 15, 2003.  Application by public entities (other than small business issuers) for all other types of entities is required in financial statements for periods ending after March 15, 2004.  Adoptionof FIN 46 in first quarter 2004 did not result in the consolidation of any VIEs.

In December 2003, FASB revised Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 132, "Employers' Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits -- an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, and 106."  This statement revises employers'disclosures about pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans to provide more information about pension plan assets, obligations, benefit payments, contributions, and net benefit cost.  This statement retains the disclosures required by the originallyissued Statement 132 and requires further disclosures, including information describing the types of plan assets, investment strategy, measurement date(s), plan obligations, cash flows, and components of net periodic benefit cost recognized during interimperiods.  SFAS No. 132 (revised 2003) is effective for financial statements with fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003, except for disclosure of information about foreign plans and disclosure of estimated future benefit payments, which are effective forfiscal years ending after June 15, 2004. 

**NOTE 16 - LITIGATION**

****

As further described in the Company's 2003 Annual Report, the Company continues to protect its intellectual property portfolio by engaging in both licensing discussions and patent infringement litigation.  The following is a discussion of the 2004developments for patent and other litigation.  Litigation is subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties.  See "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" in MD&A for further discussion of these risks and uncertainties.

***Intel Litigation:***  On July 29, 2001, the Company filed a patent infringement case against Intel in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (the "Texas case").  The Texas case pertained to the Company's parallel instructioncomputing ("PIC") patents and went to trial on July 2, 2002. 

On March 29, 2004, the Company resolved its dispute with Intel regarding its PIC patents, and both parties agreed to dismiss all outstanding patent infringement claims and lawsuits against each other.  Per the terms of the settlement agreement, Intel paid theCompany $125 million on April 5, 2004, and will pay an additional $100 million in four quarterly installments over the following year.  In addition, the Company will grant Dell certain licenses to its patents and has agreed to dismiss its separate pendinglitigation against Dell in the OEM case.

******

***OEM Litigation:***  On December 16, 2002, the Company filed a patent infringement action against Dell, Gateway Inc.TM ("Gateway") and Hewlett-Packard Co.TM/Compaq ("HP") in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.  The Company'scomplaint alleges that products from the three computer vendors infringe U.S. Patent Numbers 4,899,275 and 4,933,835 and 5,091,846.  These computer system-level patents relate to memory management technology.  The OEM action seeks an unspecified amount ofdamages for past infringement from the OEM defendants.  The OEMs have asserted various defenses, pre-trial motions and countersuits against the Company. 

Per the terms of the March 29, 2004 settlement agreement with Intel, the Company dismissed Dell and all related claims from the pending OEM litigation.  The Markman hearing was held on May 7, 2004 and the current scheduling has the trial scheduled to begin on August 2, 2004.

In addition to asserting affirmative defenses in the Texas Court, HP filed a patent countersuit against the Company in the Northern District of California on May 28, 2003.  HP also asked the Texas court to transfer the OEM case to the Northern District of California for consolidation with HP's countersuit.  The Texas court denied HP's motion to transfer the Texas OEM case to California.  HP's California countersuit alleges that a variety of Intergraph products, including SmartPlant 3D, IntelliShipTM,SmartPlant, SmartSketch®, I/Mobile TC, and IntelliWhereTM, infringe four separate HP patents.  The Company filed a motion to have HP's California countersuit transferred to the Northern District of Alabama, which was subsequentlydenied. 

HP has also filed an amended answer and counterclaim in the Texas case, which alleges that Intergraph's patent assertions are a violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.  The Company has filed a motion to dismiss HP's antitrust counterclaims as a matter oflaw.  The Texas court has not yet ruled on Intergraph's motion to dismiss.  The Company believes HP's antitrust counterclaim to be without merit, and will vigorously defend against the same.

On April 1, 2004, HP filed a patent countersuit against the Company in Mannheim, Germany.  HP's German suit accuses the Company's SmartPlant 3D products of infringing two foreign patents related to the automated dimensioning technology asserted in HP'sCalifornia countersuit.

On April 19, 2004, HP filed three separate legal actions against the Company.  HP filed a patent infringement action in Delaware and in the Eastern District of Texas.  The Delaware action accuses the Company's ZI Imaging® digital camera ofinfringing a patent related to scanning technology.  The new Texas case accuses the Company's SmartPlant 3D, IntelliShipTM, SmartPlant Offshore and SmartSketch® products of infringing a patent related to dimensional conversions in computer-aideddesign software.  HP also filed an action in the German patent office seeking to invalidate one of the foreign Clipper patents.

The Company is evaluating HP's latest filings, but plans to vigorously defend against the same.  The Company has not determined what impact, if any, HP's countersuits may have on the Company's operations and cash flows. 

******

On May 7, 2004, the Company filed a patent infringement action against HP in the Eastern District of Texas, which alleges that certain HP server and chipset products infringe U.S. Patent Number 6,374,329.  The Company's High Availability Super Server ("HASS")patent pertains to interoperability and coherency technology used in clustered server systems.  The Company's complaint alleges that its HASS technology is employed in HP's "DNA Memory Subsystem TechnologyTM", including HP's SX1000 chipset, and Superdome,HP9000, 8400 and 7410 families of servers. 

******

***Advanced Micro Devices******Litigation:***  On January 15, 2004, ****Advanced Micro Devices ("AMD") filed a Declaratory Judgment Act patent action against the Company in the Northern District of California. AMD asserted that the Company's family of "Clipper" patents (U.S. Patent Nos. 4,860,192, 4,884,197, 4,899,275, 4,933,835 and 5,091,846) are either invalid, or not infringed by AMD's microprocessor products.  On April 12, 2004, AMD agreed to settle its patentlawsuit against the Company and to take a license to the Company's Clipper patents.  Under the terms of this license, AMD will pay the Company $10 million by May 7, 2004, and will make additional cash payments equal to 2% of the AMD Computation Product Group'spre-tax operating profits, if any, for the 2005 through 2007 calendar years, subject to a limit of $5 million per year.  The Company received the $10 million payment prior to the filing of this report.

***Other Litigation:*******  The Company has other ongoing litigation, none of which is considered to represent a material contingency for the Company at this time; however, any unanticipated adverse developments in any of these proceedings couldmaterially adversely affect the Company's results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.

****

**ITEM 2.   MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS**

**CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS**

This report contains forward-looking statements (all statements other than those made solely with respect to historical fact) within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 including, but not limited to, the business outlook ofIntergraph Corporation (the "Company" or "Intergraph"), projections about revenue, operating income levels, margins, and market conditions and their anticipated impact on the Company and its vertical business segments; expectations regarding Intergraph's variousongoing litigation proceedings; expectations regarding future results and cash flows; information regarding the development, timing of introduction, and performance of new products; and any statements of the plans, strategies, and objectives of management for future operations.  These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties (some of which are beyond the Company's control) that could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated in theforward-looking statements.  Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, potential adverse outcomes or rulings in our ongoing efforts to protect our intellectual property, including the Company's claims against certain original equipment manufacturers, including Gateway Inc.TM and Hewlett-Packard Co.TM or their countersuits against the Company, and other ongoing and potential litigation and patent enforcement efforts; the ability, timing, and costs (including the calculation of success and other fees) to enforce and protect the Company's intellectual property rights; potential adverse outcomes in our efforts to improve our operating performance (including uncertainties with respect to the timing and magnitude of any expected improvements); material changes with respect to our business, litigation prospects, or the securities markets (including the market for Intergraph common stock); risks associated with doing business internationally (including foreign currency fluctuations); worldwide political and economic conditions and changes; the ability to attract or retain key personnel; increased competition; rapid technological change; unanticipated changes in customer requirements; the ability to access the technology necessary to compete in the markets served; risks associated with various ongoing litigation proceedings; and other risks detailed in our press releases or in our annual, quarterly, or other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").

****

**OVERVIEW**

Intergraph is a pioneer of computer graphics software and services in the commercial and government sectors.  Founded in 1969, the Company has delivered numerous innovations in interactive graphics solutions.  Today, Intergraph's core mission is toenable businesses and governments to make better and faster operational decisions, and through software and services, help its customers organize vast amounts of complex data into understandable visual representations.  Intergraph's technology enables ourcustomers to create intelligent maps, manage assets and infrastructure, build and operate better plants and ships, and dispatch emergency services to those in need.

Over the past six years, the Company has taken significant measures to reduce its losses and return to profitability, including extensive reductions in its workforce, the sale of several non-core business units and assets, and the exit of the Company's hardwaredesign and manufacturing operations in 2000.  These actions allowed the Company to return to profitability in 2001.  The Company was profitable again in 2002, 2003, and first quarter 2004. 

Management is focused on improving the Company's operating margins.  The overall strategic goal in the next two to three years is the expansion of operating margin percentages (income from operations divided by revenue) to be more in line with peercompanies.  While primarily focused on operating margins, management also monitors revenue, gross margins, and operating expenses for each business unit and the Company as a whole.  While first quarter 2004 revenue grew 10% over first quarter 2003, theCompany anticipates modest annual revenue growth for 2004.  Over half of the revenue growth in first quarter 2004 was related to the impact of currency fluctuations, primarily with respect to the Euro versus the U.S. dollar.  The Company believes anyimprovement in income from operations for 2004 will primarily be due to expense reductions as a result of the recent restructuring initiatives and anticipated slight improvements in gross margins. 

Income from operations was 6.2% of revenue for Q1 2004 compared to 1.4% for Q4 2003 and 3.5% for Q1 2003.  The increase in operating income as a percentage of revenue is primarily due to the Company's efforts to reduce costs in late 2003 and early 2004,higher gross margins as a result of more software content in systems and maintenance revenues, and higher service margins in the ISG business unit.  Variations in quarterly results are expected; however, the Company remains optimistic regarding its goal ofbringing annual operating margins more in line with those of its peer group over time.

In addition, management is currently evaluating the strategic direction of the Company and each of the Company's businesses to determine the size of the markets served, growth prospects for each market, potential strategies to grow each business, and the risksversus available risk-adjusted returns of each of the businesses.  This initial review should be completed in 2004. 

The Company has intellectual property that resulted from its hardware design and manufacturing operations that the Company exited in 2000.  This intellectual property is used in a variety of industries, including computers, consumer electronics,telecommunications, and electronics design.  The Company defends the value of its intellectual property portfolio through licensing and litigation.  The Company remains actively engaged in licensing discussions, as well as patent litigation with severalcompanies.  In first quarter 2004, net intellectual property income of $203.1 million included $225 million in income from the Company's settlement with Intel and Dell, offset by $21.9 million in legal fees and other related expenses associated with patentlitigation.  In first quarter 2003, net intellectual property income of $5.3 million included $10 million in  income from a cross-licensing agreement with International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM") that also resolved all outstanding patent infringement claims between IBM and the Company, offsetby $4.7 million in legal fees and other related expenses.

The Company's current operations are divided into four business segments along with a Corporate oversight function ("Corporate").  The Company's business segments are Intergraph Process, Power & Offshore ("PPO"); Intergraph Mapping and Geospatial Solutions("IMGS"); Intergraph Solutions Group ("ISG"); and Intergraph Public Safety, Inc. ("IPS").  For a complete discussion, see the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 ("2003 Annual Report").

****

**RESULTS OF OPERATIONS**

**Revenues**

Total revenues for first quarter 2004 were $133.0 million, up approximately 10% from first quarter 2003.

Sales outside the United States represented approximately 49% of total revenues in first quarter 2004, up slightly from the comparable period in 2003.  European revenues were 32% of total revenues for first quarter 2004, also up slightly from the firstquarter 2003 level.

The Company reports revenue in three categories, consisting of systems, maintenance, and services revenues.  The following discussions detail each of these revenue categories.

***Systems:***  Systems revenue for first quarter 2004 was $70.4 million, flat with the corresponding prior-year period.  Although revenues increased in 2004 approximately 4% due to a weakening of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies, thisincrease was offset by decreases reported in the ISG business segment, resulting from projects completed or near completion in first quarter 2003.

***Maintenance:***  Maintenance revenues totaled $33.0 million in first quarter 2004, up approximately 10% from the same period in 2003.  Revenues increased $2.4 million as the result of a weaker U.S. dollar, $1.3 million in new shipbuildingproducts offered by the PPO business segment, and approximately $570,000 for continued growth of existing customer base in the IPS business segment.

***Services:***  Services revenue, consisting of revenues from implementation and consulting services, totaled $29.6 million for the quarter, up approximately 47% from the prior-year period.  This increase is primarily due to the effect of alarge U.S. government project that began mid-2003 in the ISG business segment and increased activity by IMGS, primarily in Europe and Asia.  In addition, services revenues increased approximately 9% due to a weakening of the U.S. dollar.

**Gross Margin**

The Company's total gross margin for first quarter 2004 was 50%, compared to 47% for first quarter 2003.

***Systems:***  Systems margin was 51% for first quarter 2004, up from 48% for first quarter 2003.  The margin improvement is primarily due to the IMGS business segment, for software delivery of photogrammetric and mapping softwareproducts on a large, non-recurring order and increased product and services volume on certain large products.  These increases are offset by increased amortization of capitalized software development costs of $1.3 million, mostly in the PPO businesssegment.  In general, the Company believes its systems margins are improved by higher software content in the product mix, a weaker U.S. dollar in international markets, and less discounting.  Also, systems margins are lowered by price competition, a higherservices and third party content in the product mix, a stronger U.S. dollar in international markets, and a higher mix of federal government sales, which generally produce lower margins than commercial sales. 

***Maintenance:***  Maintenance margin for first quarter 2004 was 68%, up from 59% for first quarter 2003.  Maintenance margins improved in all business units from 2003 to 2004, partially the result of an increase in new software maintenancecontracts and fewer hardware maintenance contracts that produce lower margins than software maintenance contracts.  In addition, a new, significant shipbuilding maintenance contract within the PPO business segment contributed $1.3 million to the overallimprovement of 2004 margin.

***Services:***  Services margin was 29% for first quarter 2004, up from 24% for first quarter 2003.  The improvement in services margin is due mainly to increased activity on a large U.S. government project in the ISG business segment, as wellas higher employee utilization rates for ISG.  Also, services margin improved approximately 11% due to a weaker U.S. dollar in 2004.  Significant fluctuations in services revenues and margins from period to period are not unusual and can be caused by new orcompleted large orders, delayed progress on existing projects, and employee utilization rates.

****

**Operating Expenses**

Operating expenses, including restructuring charges of $826,000, were $58.9 million for first quarter 2004, up 12% from the comparable prior-year period. 

***Product Development Expenses:***  Product development expenses were $14.6 million for first quarter 2004, up 22.7% from the first quarter 2003 level.  This increase was primarily the result of the $1.4 million increase in shipbuilding productdevelopment costs in the PPO business segment, combined with the $938,000 decrease in software development costs qualifying for capitalization in the IMGS business segment.

***Sales and Marketing Expenses:***  Sales and marketing expenses were $26.1 million for first quarter 2004, up 5.7% from the first quarter 2003 level.  This increase was primarily due to the estimated $1.8 million unfavorable currency impact,combined with the approximately $600,000 increase resulting from expanding headcount in the IPS business segment in an effort to grow orders and increase future revenues.  These increases were partially offset by the approximately $400,000 decrease due toincreased billable activity in the PPO business segment, and the approximately $300,000 decrease from trade show related activities in IMGS.

***General and Administrative Expenses:***  General and administrative expenses were $17.5 million, up 10.4% from the first quarter 2003 level.  This increase was primarily the result of the approximately $900,000 increase in legal fees, anestimated $702,000 unfavorable currency impact, and an $842,000 increase in allowance for doubtful accounts, partially offset by $640,000 of expense reductions related to fourth quarter 2003 restructuring.

****

***Restructuring Charges: *** In first quarter 2004, the Company recorded $826,000 in restructuring charges primarily in its PPO business segment in an effort to realign costs with revenues.  In fourth quarter 2003, the Company recorded $4million in restructuring charges in an effort to realign costs with revenues in the Corporate and IMGS business segments.  In fourth quarter 2002, the Company recorded $2.1 million in restructuring charges as a result of combining the Utilities andCommunications business with the IMGS division.  For a complete discussion of restructuring charges, see the Company's 2003 Annual Report and Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Form 10-Q.

****

**Non-Operating Income and Expense**

***Intellectual Property:***  "Intellectual property income, net" in the consolidated statements of income consists of income resulting from settlements and licensing of the Company's intellectual property, net of legal fees and other expensesassociated with maintaining and defending the Company's intellectual property.  Income and expenses associated with the intellectual property division, including related legal expenses, are classified and reported in this section of the consolidated statementsof income in order to more clearly show the operating results of the Company's business units. 

In first quarter 2004, net intellectual property income of $203.1 million included $225 million in income from the Company's settlement with Intel and Dell, offset by $21.9 million in legal fees and other related expenses associated with patent litigation. In first quarter 2003, net intellectual property income of $5.3 million included $10 million in income from a cross-licensing agreement with IBM that also resolved all outstanding patent infringement claims between IBM and the Company, offset by $4.7 million in legalfees and other related expenses.  See Notes 11 and 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Form 10-Q and the Company's 2003 Annual Report for complete details of these transactions.

***Gain on Sale of Assets:***  In first quarter 2003, IMGS reported a gain of $1.2 million from the March 2003 sale of its aeronautical intellectual property assets to Ingegneria Dei Sistemi S.p.A. in Rome, Italy. 

***Interest Income:***  Interest income was $881,000 in first quarter 2004 and $1.9 million in first quarter 2003.  Interest income decreased during 2004 due to declines in investments as a result of the Company's fourth quarter 2003 modifiedDutch auction tender offer and lower interest rates.

***Other:***   "Other income (expense), net" in the consolidated statements of income consists of interest expense, foreign exchange gains and losses, and other miscellaneous items of non-operating income and expense.  In first quarter 2004, netother income of $1.1 million included a $733,000 foreign exchange gain.  In first quarter 2003, net other expense of $43,000 included a $371,000 foreign exchange loss. 

**Income Taxes**

Income tax expenses for the first quarters of 2004 and 2003 are attributable to taxes on intellectual property income, U.S. operations, and individually profitable majority-owned subsidiaries.  See the Company's 2003 Annual Report for details of the Company'stax position, including its net operating loss carryforwards.

**Results by Operating Segment**

In first quarter 2004, PPO earned operating income of $3.3 million on revenues of $33.7 million, compared to first quarter 2003 operating income of $4.2 million on revenues of $30.5 million.  The decrease in operating income despite increased revenuesresulted primarily from restructuring charges of $823,000, combined with higher product development and sales and marketing expenses.  The increase in revenue was due primarily to shipbuilding maintenance revenue associated with the Global Research andDevelopment ("GRAD") shipbuilding contract signed in April 2003 and increasing services and maintenance revenue from new products. 

In first quarter 2004, IMGS earned operating income of $3.7 million on revenues of $52.0 million, compared to first quarter 2003 operating income of $186,000 on revenues of $46.8 million.  The significant increase in operating income is primarily the resultof the delivery of a large photogrammetric and mapping software order that drove higher gross margins, as well as increased product and services revenue volume on certain large projects.  The revenue and margin improvements were partially offset by higheroperating expenses, primarily as a result of fewer product development projects qualifying for capitalization.

In first quarter 2004, ISG earned operating income of $3.8 million on revenues of $30.1 million, compared to first quarter 2003 operating income of $1.1 million on revenues of $27.5 million.  The significant increase in operating income is primarily due tohigher gross margins attributable to increased billable hours on the U.S. Air Force Enhanced Technical Information Management System ("ETIMS") contract required to meet customer schedule requirements, higher utilization rates as labor resources transitioned fromunbillable to billable work, and reduced sales and marketing expenses.

In first quarter 2004, IPS earned operating income of $2.1 million on revenues of $16.9 million, compared to first quarter 2003 operating income of $3.5 million on revenues of $16.5 million.  Operating income decreased primarily due to increased sales andmarketing and research and development expenses resulting from headcount additions in an effort to increase orders and future revenues combined with increased general and administrative expenses resulting from higher allowance for doubtful accounts.

In first quarter 2004, Corporate reported an operating loss of $4.7 million on revenues of $2.8 million, compared to a first quarter 2003 operating loss of $4.7 million on revenues of $3.5 million.  Revenues are primarily associated with hardware repair,logistics, and international hardware maintenance services.  Operating expenses include costs associated with worldwide corporate oversight functions, including those related to being a publicly held company, and management of residual hardware functions.

See Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Form 10-Q for further explanation of the Company's segment reporting.

****

**Litigation**

As further described in the Company's 2003 Annual Report, the Company continues to protect its intellectual property portfolio by engaging in both licensing discussions and patent infringement litigation.  Litigation is subject to known and unknown risks anduncertainties.  See "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" in MD&A.  See Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Form 10-Q for a discussion of the 2004 developments for patent and other litigation.

****

**Remainder of the Year**

The Company expects that the markets in which it competes will continue to be characterized by intense competition, rapidly changing technologies, and shorter product cycles.  Further improvement in the Company's annual operating results will depend onaccurately anticipating customer requirements and technological trends, and rapidly and continuously developing and delivering new products that are competitively priced, offer enhanced performance, and meet customers' requirements for standardization andinteroperability.  Better annual operating results will also depend on global political events and worldwide economic improvement in the markets served.  To increase operating profitability, the Company must achieve revenue growth and continue to alignoperating expenses with the projected level of revenue.  The Company continues to work on its forward business planning process.  As the Company continues to evaluate its markets and operating performance, it may determine that there are other actionsneeded to seek improved performance.  In addition, the Company continues to face legal expenses of unknown duration and amount as it licenses its intellectual property and otherwise asserts its intellectual property rights and defends related countersuits. The ultimate impact of these initiatives is subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties.  See "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" in MD&A.

**LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES**

At March 31, 2004, cash and cash equivalents totaled $250.5 million compared to $265.8 million at December 31, 2003.  The Company had no debt at March 31, 2004, or December 31, 2003.  Non-operating events that may require the use of cash include theCompany's patent litigation and enforcement program, including defending related countersuits, and its stock repurchase program.

During first quarter 2004, the Company did not purchase any of its common stock under its stock repurchase program.  As of March 31, 2004, the Company had repurchased approximately 16.3 million shares (including 10 million shares in a modified Dutch auctionin December 2003) at a cost of $378 million since the program was initiated in late 2001.  The Company has a $250 million open market repurchase plan with $135 million remaining that can be used to repurchase stock in the future.  The termination date forthe current stock repurchase program is December 31, 2005. 

In September 2002, in order to reduce the cost of issuing letters of credit, the Company established a $12.5 million credit line with Wells Fargo Bank to cover its outstanding letters of credit secured by $15 million of interest-bearing securities.  Thiscredit line was reduced on January 20, 2004, to $6 million secured by $8.2 million of interest-bearing securities.  Under this arrangement, the Company earns interest on the securities and withdrawal of securities is allowed, but the Company is required tomaintain a level of securities sufficient to cover total outstanding letters of credit (which totaled $4.9 million at March 31, 2004, and December 31, 2003).

****

**CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES             **

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires that management use judgments to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements.  Asa result, there is some risk that reported financial results could have been materially different had different methods, assumptions, and estimates been used.  The Company believes that of its significant accounting policies, those related to revenuerecognition, capitalized software, deferred taxes, bad debt reserves, and inventory may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity as used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.

Management believes there have been no significant changes during the three months ended March 31, 2004, to the items disclosed as "Critical Accounting Policies" in MD&A in the Company's 2003 Annual Report.

**ITEM 3.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK**

The Company has experienced no material changes in market risk exposures that affect the quantitative and qualitative disclosures presented in the Company's 2003 Annual Report.

**Impact of Currency Fluctuations and Currency Risk Management**

Fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar in international markets can have a significant impact on the Company's results of operations.  For first quarter 2004, approximately 49% of the Company's revenues were derived from customers outside the UnitedStates, primarily through subsidiary operations, compared to 48% for first quarter 2003.  Most subsidiaries sell to customers and incur and pay operating expenses in local currencies.  These local currency revenues and expenses are translated into U.S.dollars for reporting purposes.  A weaker U.S. dollar increases the level of reported U.S. dollar orders and revenues, increases the dollar gross margin, and increases reported dollar operating expenses of the international subsidiaries.  The Companyestimates that the weakening of the U.S. dollar in its international markets, primarily in Europe, improved its first quarter 2004 results of operations by approximately $0.05 per share (diluted) in comparison to first quarter 2003.

The Company conducts business in all major markets outside the United States, but the most significant of these operations with respect to currency risk are located in Europe and Asia. ** ** Local currencies are the functional currencies for the Company'sCanadian subsidiaries, a Japanese subsidiary, and all but one of the Company's European subsidiaries.  The U.S. dollar is the functional currency for all other international subsidiaries.  The Company had no forward contracts outstanding at March 31, 2004,or December 31, 2003, and does not currently hedge any of its foreign currency risks.

**Impact of Interest Rates on Investment Earnings**

The Company's cash and cash equivalents are generally invested in short-term, highly liquid, interest-bearing securities which may include short-term municipal bonds, time deposits, money market funds, commercial paper, and U.S. government securities.  TheCompany limits the amount of credit exposure from any single issuer of securities.  The Company is subject to earnings fluctuations due to market changes in interest rates.  The Company estimates that pre-tax earnings could be affected by approximately$0.03 per share (diluted) on an annualized basis, should interest rates of invested funds change by 0.5%.

**ITEM 4.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES**

The Company, under the direction of the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and the Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), has established disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reportsthat it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms.  The disclosure controls and procedures are also intended to ensure that suchinformation is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including the CEO and the CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

The CEO and the CFO have reviewed and evaluated the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.  Based on, and as of the effective date of, that review and evaluation, the CEO and the CFO have concludedthat the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effectively serving the stated purposes.

In addition, there have been no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

**PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION**

****

**ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS**

****

As further described in the Company's 2003 Annual Report, the Company continues to protect its intellectual property portfolio by engaging in both licensing discussions and patent infringement litigation.  The following is a discussion of the 2004developments for patent and other litigation.  Litigation is subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties.  See "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" in MD&A for further discussion of these risks and uncertainties.

******

***Intel Litigation:***  On July 29, 2001, the Company filed a patent infringement case against Intel in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (the "Texas case").  The Texas case pertained to the Company's parallel instructioncomputing ("PIC") patents and went to trial on July 2, 2002. 

On March 29, 2004, the Company resolved its dispute with Intel regarding its PIC patents, and both parties agreed to dismiss all outstanding patent infringement claims and lawsuits against each other.  Per the terms of the settlement agreement, Intel paid theCompany $125 million on April 5, 2004, and will pay an additional $100 million in four quarterly installments over the following year.  In addition, the Company will grant Dell certain licenses to its patents and has agreed to dismiss its separate pendinglitigation against Dell in the OEM case.

******

***OEM Litigation:***  On December 16, 2002, the Company filed a patent infringement action against Dell, Gateway Inc.TM ("Gateway") and Hewlett-Packard Co.TM/Compaq ("HP") in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.  The Company's complaint alleges that products from the three computer vendors infringe U.S. Patent Numbers 4,899,275 and 4,933,835 and 5,091,846.  These computer system-level patents relate to memory management technology.  The OEM action seeks an unspecified amount of damages for past infringement from the OEM defendants.  The OEMs have asserted various defenses, pre-trial motions and countersuits against the Company. 

Per the terms of the March 29, 2004 settlement agreement with Intel, the Company dismissed Dell and all related claims from the pending OEM litigation.  The Markman hearing was held on May 7, 2004 and the current scheduling has the trial scheduled to begin on August 2, 2004.

In addition to asserting affirmative defenses in the Texas Court, HP filed a patent countersuit against the Company in the Northern District of California on May 28, 2003.  HP also asked the Texas court to transfer the OEM case to the Northern District of California for consolidation with HP's countersuit.  The Texas court denied HP's motion to transfer the Texas OEM case to California.  HP's California countersuit alleges that a variety of Intergraph products, including SmartPlant 3D, IntelliShipTM,SmartPlant, SmartSketch®, I/Mobile TC, and IntelliWhereTM, infringe four separate HP patents.  The Company filed a motion to have HP's California countersuit transferred to the Northern District of Alabama, which was subsequentlydenied. 

HP has also filed an amended answer and counterclaim in the Texas case, which alleges that Intergraph's patent assertions are a violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.  The Company has filed a motion to dismiss HP's antitrust counterclaims as a matter oflaw.  The Texas court has not yet ruled on Intergraph's motion to dismiss.  The Company believes HP's antitrust counterclaim to be without merit, and will vigorously defend against the same.

On April 1, 2004, HP filed a patent countersuit against the Company in Mannheim, Germany.  HP's German suit accuses the Company's SmartPlant 3D products of infringing two foreign patents related to the automated dimensioning technology asserted in HP'sCalifornia countersuit.

On April 19, 2004, HP filed three separate legal actions against the Company.  HP filed a patent infringement action in Delaware and in the Eastern District of Texas.  The Delaware action accuses the Company's ZI Imaging® digital camera ofinfringing a patent related to scanning technology.  The new Texas case accuses the Company's SmartPlant 3D, IntelliShipTM, SmartPlant Offshore and SmartSketch® products of infringing a patent related to dimensional conversions in computer-aideddesign software.  HP also filed an action in the German patent office seeking to invalidate one of the foreign Clipper patents.

The Company is evaluating HP's latest filings, but plans to vigorously defend against the same.  The Company has not determined what impact, if any, HP's countersuits may have on the Company's operations and cash flows. 

******

On May 7, 2004, the Company filed a patent infringement action against HP in the Eastern District of Texas, which alleges that certain HP server and chipset products infringe U.S. Patent Number 6,374,329.  The Company's High Availability Super Server ("HASS")patent pertains to interoperability and coherency technology used in clustered server systems.  The Company's complaint alleges that its HASS technology is employed in HP's "DNA Memory Subsystem TechnologyTM", including HP's SX1000 chipset, and Superdome,HP9000, 8400 and 7410 families of servers. 

******

***Advanced Micro Devices Litigation:***  On January 15, 2004, ****Advanced Micro Devices ("AMD") filed a Declaratory Judgment Act patent action against the Company in the Northern District of California. AMD asserted that the Company's family of "Clipper" patents (U.S. Patent Nos. 4,860,192, 4,884,197, 4,899,275, 4,933,835 and 5,091,846) are either invalid, or not infringed by AMD's microprocessor products.  On April 12, 2004, AMD agreed to settle its patentlawsuit against the Company and to take a license to the Company's Clipper patents.  Under the terms of this license, AMD will pay the Company $10 million by May 7, 2004, and will make additional cash payments equal to 2% of the AMD Computation Product Group'spre-tax operating profits, if any, for the 2005 through 2007 calendar years, subject to a limit of $5 million per year.  The Company received the $10 million payment prior to the filing of this report.

***Other Litigation:*******  The Company has other ongoing litigation, none of which is considered to represent a material contingency for the Company at this time; however, any unanticipated adverse developments in any of these proceedings couldmaterially adversely affect the Company's results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.

****

**ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K**

(a)

Exhibits        
 
Exhibit

Number

Description

 

31.1

Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by R. Halsey Wise dated May 7, 2004
 
31.2

Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Larry J. Laster dated May 7, 2004
 :
32.1

Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by R. Halsey Wise dated May 7, 2004
 
32.2

Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Larry J. Laster dated May 7, 2004
 
(b)

Reports on Form 8-K

Form 8-K dated January 29, 2004, reporting the Company's 2003 earnings
 
Form 8-K dated March 30, 2004, furnished pursuant to Item 9, reporting a patent settlement with Intel Corporation and resolution of patent infringement claims against Dell Inc.TM*
 
Form 8-K dated March 30, 2004, filed pursuant to Item 5, reporting the settlement agreement between Intergraph Corporation and Intel Corporation and license to Dell Inc.TM
 
* Information in a Form 8-K furnished pursuant to Item 9 is not deemed to be "filed" for the purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934.

****
****
**INTERGRAPH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES**

****

**SIGNATURES**

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

**INTERGRAPH CORPORATION**

(Registrant)
   
By:

/s/ R. Halsey Wise
        
By:

/s/ Larry J. Laster

R. Halsey Wise

Larry J. Laster

President and

Executive Vice President and

Chief Executive Officer         

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
 
Date:      

May 10, 2004

Date:      

May 10, 2004
 
By:

/s/ Larry T. Miles

Larry T. Miles

Vice President and

Corporate Controller

(Chief Accounting Officer)
 
Date:

May 10, 2004