alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,542
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,101
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,153
<PP&E>                                          12,614
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,374
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,617
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,255
<BONDS>                                          5,972
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,764
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,617
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,325
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,742
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,463
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   457
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,147
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,946
<INCOME-TAX>                                       876
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,070
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,070
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32


</TABLE>
# CE2004078EN.01067701.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/677 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/677

---

(2004/C 78 E/0721)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3951/03

by Alexander de Roo (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(22 December 2003)

Subject:   Genetically modified GloFish

Subject:

On Monday, 5 January 2004 the US firm Yorktown Technologies plans to start marketing the first genetically modified pets. The GloFish is a genetically modified zebra fish. A green fluorescent gene from a jellyfish and a red fluorescent gene from a sea anemone make the zebra fish glow green or red in the dark under ultraviolet light. The GloFish was originally developed in Singapore as an indicator for toxic substances in water, as the fish lights up red when it comes into contact with poisonous substances. This transgenic zebra fish is now in danger of becoming a sought-after pet, at a price of USD 5.

Does the European Commission not agree that the genetic modification of these fish is in breach of the Protocol on protection and welfare of animals included in the 1997 Treaty of Amsterdam?

What steps does the European Commission intend to take to prevent the import and sale of such fish in the European Union, in line with the current moratorium on GM products?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(10 February 2004)

(10 February 2004)

In relation to the animal welfare aspects of this question, the Commission currently has no information as to whether the genetic modification of this particular species would compromise its general welfare when kept as a pet in a domestic aquarium.

No animal welfare rules exist at Community level for fish kept as pets, and therefore this aspect is entirely within the competence of the Member States.

With regard to the import and commercial exploitation of genetically modified fish within the European Community, the Commission would like to point out that, under Directive 2001/18/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms (1), a GMO cannot be marketed in the European Union without first obtaining authorisation for placing on the market in accordance with part C of the Directive, based on a case-by-case scientific evaluation of the potential risks that the GMO in question could pose to human health and the environment. To date no request has been made to release the organism in question into the environment for experimental or commercial purposes.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 106, 17.4.2001.

1

---
# CE2004078EN.01066201.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/662 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/662

---

(2004/C 78 E/0706)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3872/03

by Alexander de Roo (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(16 December 2003)

Subject:   Impact of EU investment in the Júcar-Vinalopó water transfer

Subject:

The agreement between the users of the Júcar-Vinalopó water transfer and the state company Aguas del Júcar S.A. of 13 July 2001 explicitly states that neither Spanish state investments, nor those of the EU, described as ‘rest of the investment’ will have any impact on item (c) of Clause III of the Agreement. This money will not be reclaimed from the users, neither in the form of water tariffs, nor repayments, nor operational costs, nor in any other way.

Does the Commission not believe that treating Community funding in this way runs counter to the following Community obligations: transparency in managing and applying European funds (recitals 26 and 57 and Articles 17 to 19, 34, 36 and 46 of Regulation 1260/1999 (1)); the ban on distorting competition within the internal market by means of state aids (EC Treaty Article 87); the protection of the Community's financial interests (EC Treaty Article 280); and the obligations on economic transparency and the need to take due account of the principle of recovery of the costs of water-related services (Article 9 and Annex III of Directive 2600/60/EC (2)?

1

2

On 2 June 2003, the Spanish state's own lawyers recognised the independence of the nature of public funds relative to the issue of including, within the regulation levies and water use tariffs, the monetary sums financed with European funds in water regulation schemes.

Furthermore, account needs to be taken of the fact that 35 hm3 per year, of a total of 80 hm3 planned for this water transfer, are intended for urban supply, for which it has been standard practice for years that the users repay the investment via the tariffs. In the case of the Alicantí and Marína Baja, the fresh supplies are basically designed to meet current rising tourist demand. This means that the Commission would be funding, on a no-return basis, the Spanish tourist industry. Can the Commission accept this situation?

3

3

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(4 February 2004)

(4 February 2004)

The Commission is collecting the information it needs to answer the question. It will communicate its findings as soon as possible.

---

(1)  OJ L 161, 26.6.1999, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 1.

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-24-2000
<CASH>                                                75,547
<SECURITIES>                                          51,889
<RECEIVABLES>                                         46,235
<ALLOWANCES>                                           1,184
<INVENTORY>                                           31,427
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     214,535
<PP&E>                                                72,264
<DEPRECIATION>                                        43,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       257,426
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 34,788
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                               1,748
<OTHER-SE>                                           217,319
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         257,426
<SALES>                                               62,936
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      62,936
<CGS>                                                 47,108
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         14,910
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         (73)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        2,861
<INCOME-TAX>                                          (1,774)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    4,635
<DISCONTINUED>                                           780
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                           5,415
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0.15


</TABLE>
# C_2004314EN.01000101.xml

| 18.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/1

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 14 October 2004

in Case C-279/02 P: Nuno Antas de Campos v European Parliament (1)

(Appeal - Officials - Council Regulation (EC, Euratom, ECSC) No 2688/95 - Refusal of application for voluntary termination of service)

(2004/C 314/01)

Language of the case: Portuguese

In Case C-279/02: Nuno Antas de Campos, official at the European Parliament, residing in Lisbon (Portugal) (Lawyers: C. Botelho Moniz and E. Maia Cadete), the other party to the proceedings being the European Parliament (Agents: R. da Silva Passos and J.F de Wachter) – appeal under Article 49 of the EC Statute of the Court of Justice, brought on 29 July 2002 – the Court (Third Chamber), composed of: A. Rosas, acting as President of the Chamber, N. Colneric and K. Schiemann (Rapporteur), Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 14 October 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal.

| 2. | Orders Mr Antas de Campos to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Antas de Campos to pay the costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 274 of 9.11.2002

---
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Luther Jay Stowe, Appellant

No. 06-13-00203-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 6th District Court of Red 

River County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR00479). Memorandum Opinion delivered 

by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Carter and 

Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the motion of the appellant to 

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Luther Jay Stowe, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED FEBRUARY 20, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 2 2

- 3859

_____________________________ A NTHONY C REWS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Joshua M. Hawkes , Judge

. January 25, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , R AY , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Kevin P. Steiger , Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney Ge neral, and Virginia Chester Harris
, Sen ior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee

.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this AnnualReport on Form 40-F of North American Palladium Ltd. (the “Report”) forthe year ended December 31, 2007, I, James D. Excell, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the issuer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto the best of my knowledge:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe issuer.

 
| Date: March 31, 2008 | By:    | /s/ James D. Excell                    |
|---------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                      |   |                                   |
|                      |   | James D. Excell                        |
|                      |   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

This certification accompaniesthe annual report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, be deemed filed by the issuer for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Supreme Industries, Inc.(the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 1,2006 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) of 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

 
| DATE: May 16,  2006 |                     | /s/ Jeffery D.  Mowery |   |
|--------------------------|--------------------------|------------------------|--------|
|                     | Jeffery D.  Mowery       |
|                     | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit tothe Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not beingfiled as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Jay A. Herman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Delphax Technologies Inc. (the Company),do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on From 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Dated: February 10, 2006 By:             /s/ Jay A. Herman              Jay A. Herman              Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
~ 

8/13/2015 

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS 

OFF~Jt<t>ftP.9~~~qM~~~l~TOL ST 

STATE OIF TEXAS o 

PENALTY FOR 

PRIVATE USE 

TAGE)) PITNEY BOWES 

~,=IJIJ!= ~..c:==:7~ ~ 

== 

~~ ~~701 $ (0)(0)(0).~15 . 0001401603 AUG. 17. 2015. 

ISREAL, ROBERT Tr. WR-22,520-03 

On this day, the application •A•'""''"'"'"' Corpus has been received 

and presented to the Court. 

EiN3B 78~17 

Abel Acosta, Clerk 

ROBERT ISREAL 

TRAViS CO. CORR. CEN- TDC # 578241 

3614~BILL PRICE RD. 

DEL VALLE, TX 78617 

. 

,. o .a~~ ' 

R·E··.F l 

] 

tl·'l·' + t••l••lll· Ut• IIIII I,, •lth 'h·'l· I III ih I,,,,,,,,,,,, I 

I;
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bairnco Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Luke E. Fichthorn III, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ Luke E. Fichthorn, III

Luke E. Fichthorn, III

Chairman &

Chief Executive Officer





#







EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bairnco Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth L. Bayne, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



3.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



4.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ Kenneth L. Bayne

Kenneth L. Bayne

Chief Financial Officer





#
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1356 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1356

   To clarify that certain provisions of the Border Patrol Agent Pay 
Reform Act of 2014 will not take effect until after the Director of the 
    Office of Personnel Management promulgates and makes effective 
                regulations relating to such provisions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 14, 2015

   Mr. Johnson (for himself, Mr. McCain, Mr. Tester, and Mr. Carper) 
 introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered, read 
                       the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To clarify that certain provisions of the Border Patrol Agent Pay 
Reform Act of 2014 will not take effect until after the Director of the 
    Office of Personnel Management promulgates and makes effective 
                regulations relating to such provisions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EFFECTIVE DATES.

    (a) In General.--Section 2 of the Border Patrol Agent Pay Reform 
Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-277) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(i) Effective Dates.--Subsections (b), (c), (d), and (g), and the 
amendments made by such subsections, shall take effect on the first day 
of the first pay period beginning on or after January 1, 2016, except 
that--
            ``(1) any provision in section 5550(b) of title 5, United 
        States Code, as added by subsection (b), relating to 
        administering elections and making advance assignments to a 
        regular tour of duty, shall be applicable before such effective 
        date to the extent determined necessary by the Director of the 
        Office of Personnel Management; and
            ``(2) the Director of the Office of Personnel Management 
        may issue such regulations as may be necessary before such 
        effective date.''.
    (b) Retroactive Application.--The amendment made by subsection (a) 
shall be deemed to have been enacted on the date of the enactment of 
the Border Patrol Agent Pay Reform Act of 2014.
                                 <all>
```