alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USCIB: 4. 2/36 

17 January 1955 

SBEJREJP 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIBEC: 

Subject: Revision of USCIB Directive No. 14. 

Reference: USCIB 4.2/3~ dated 29 November 1954. 

1. The reference, which contains recommendations by the Security 

Committee on the above subject, was forwarded to USCIBEC for consideration by vote sheet. 

2. Vote sheet replies indicated approval by all members except 

(1) the Navy member, who stated, 11If one member grants exceptions 

freely in the matter of granting leave and liberty in the locations 

specified in Appendix A of the draft directive, the effect on personnel 

of other members would be the same as if each member made its own 

regulations. In the interest of establishing a uniform policy it is 

desired to ascertain reasons why the first location listed should be 

considered a hazardous area." and (2) the Air Force member who stated 

that he does not concur in the Reed for an interim revision of USCIB 

Directive No. 14 and recommended that SECCCM be directed to consolidate 

USCIB Directives Nos. 7 and 14 as soon as possible. 

3. In this connection, the acting Chairman of the Security 

Committee has informed this office that a sub-committee of SECCCM is 

presently working on the consolidation of Directives Nos. 7 and 14 with 

a proposed directive on "Conduct of COMINT Activities in Exposed Areas". 

Several controversial points have been raised and are being carefully 

and thoroughly studied with a view to quickly finding a solution; however in view of the complexity and size of this project SECCOM 

unanimously agreed that there was an immediate need for the unifonn 

guidance provided in the proposed revision of USCIB Directive No. 14 

and unanimously recoJIDllended that the enclosure with the reference be 

approved as a temporary expedient. 

4. Accordingly, this item will be placed on the USCIBEC agenda for 

consideration as soon as feasible. 

USCIB: 4. 2/36 tlkMfmE VIA eOMIN'l' SIIA:UNEt.s ONI.¥ 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-11-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352\l 

24
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,337,489
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,256,830
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                 11,315,691
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,421,247
<PP&E>                                       4,430,121
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,396,007
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,455,361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,347,060
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       615,104
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,463,916
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,455,361
<SALES>                                     14,786,494
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,786,494
<CGS>                                        6,908,091
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,148,719
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                83,377
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,445,602)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (401,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,044,602)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,044,602)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.33)


</TABLE>
# CE2004084EN.01074101.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/741 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/741

---

(2004/C 84 E/0836)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3840/03

by Proinsias De Rossa (PSE) to the Commission

(12 December 2003)

Subject:   Race Directive (2000/43/EC)

Subject:

Has the Commission been in contact with the Irish Government over its failure to implement the equal treatment between persons without racial and ethnic discrimination in employment and the social sector — Directive 2000/43/EC (1), which should have been implemented in Ireland by 19 July 2003? What has been the Government's response? What action is the Commission taking or proposing to take to ensure that all people living in Ireland enjoy the full protection of this legislation?

1

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(3 February 2004)

(3 February 2004)

Member States had to transpose Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin by 19 July 2003 at the latest.

Ireland has not formally notified to the Commission its transposition of Directive 2000/43/EC. Ireland has informed the Commission that technical amendments to its Employment Equality Act and Equal Status Act are necessary to ensure full compliance with the anti-discrimination Directives. The Irish authorities sent a copy of the proposed Equality Bill to the Commission on 16 January 2004 and its progress and entry into force depends upon the Irish Parliamentary timetable.

The Commission is committed to its role as guardian of the Treaties, and has already formally started infringement proceedings against Ireland (and a number of other Member States) over its failure to notify its implementation measures for Directive 2000/43/EC (by the deadline of 19 July 2003).

---

(1)  OJ L 180, 19.7.2000, p. 22.

1

---
.,r SE~Eilf~f~f 4 e 

USCIB: 14.ll/l g: 

16 April 1954 

E03.3(h)(2) 

-~4 

'l'OP SESRm FRG'i'il t::J. 9. E¥l!5 ONL¥ PL 86·36/50 USC 3605 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

1. The enclosed proposal is circulated at the request or the CIA 

Member. 

2. Owing to the fact that Brigadier Tiltman is leaving soon and 

that I lmay not yet be familiar with matters such as this, 

the enclosed proposal is circulated for vote with the view to making it 

possible to discuss it with Brigadier Tiltman before his departure if 

an affirmative response is received. 

3. Accoi>dingly, it is requested that the attached vote sheet be 

executed and returned to this office by 1700, Friday, 23 April. 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Enclosure 

Copy or CIA Memo dtd 14 Apr 1954. 

USCIB: 14.11/1 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-05-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

TOP SECRET FROTH
PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# NRO opens unclassified collaboration center

By Staff

                CHANTILLY, Va.  –              
On Thursday, Oct. 28, NRO officially opened the CASTLE—The Center for Advancing Science, Technology, Learning, and Engagements.

The CASTLE is a collaboration with NRO’s Advanced Systems and Technology (AS&T) directorate, the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) and their partnership intermediary, the Virginia Tech Applied Research Corporation (VT-ARC).

NRO Director Dr. Chris Scolese joined AS&T Director Dr. Susan Durham and AFOSR Tech Advisor Dr. Van Blackwood to cut the ribbon and officially open the center among a small group of employees from the respective organizations.

The group toured the nearly 10,000 square foot unclassified facility, which includes areas for collaboration, teaching and meetings, as well as quiet spaces, and laboratory workshops. During the tour, the CASTLE’s laboratory was set up for a hands-on geology experiment for understanding the earth’s layers, as well as a 3D printing station where a Polylactic Acid Plastic castle was being printed. Guests also stopped at the collaboration space where VT-ARC demonstrated digital collaboration capabilities that will allow NRO to more effectively interact with the unclassified world. 

The CASTLE currently hosts technical courses on topics such as small satellites and data science for staff across the Intelligence Community and Department of Defense. Personnel receive hands-on training with modern technology and experiential learning through limited-term projects and prototyping.

NRO plans to expand collaboration beyond the government in the near future. There will be opportunities for academic outreach through STEM events for K-12 students, summer internships, and college and university partnerships. 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

News Article
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0578

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DAVID LLOYD ORR,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 15, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 10 2021

11/10/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0578
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1161/2006

of 28 July 2006         

fixing the maximum aid for concentrated butter for the 14th individual invitation to tender opened under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1898/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 14th individual tender under the standing invitation to tender opened in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1898/2005 the maximum amount of the aid for concentrated butter with a minimum fat content of 96 %, as referred to in Article 47(1) of that Regulation, is fixed at 19,8 EUR/100 kg,

The end-use security provided for in Article 53(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1898/2005 is fixed at 22 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 29 July 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 July 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

(2)OJ L 308, 25.11.2005, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2107/2005 (OJ L 337, 22.12.2005, p. 20).

----
# CE2004084EN.01029001.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/290 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/290

---

(2004/C 84 E/0336)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-4047/03

by Raffaele Costa (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(12 January 2004)

Subject:   Safe use of the Internet

Subject:

The programme for safe use of the Internet and new online technologies provided for a series of actions. One of these actions aimed to promote a safe Internet environment via the creation of a network enabling information to be received from the public regarding illegal content and information to be provided to users with regard to that possibility. Can the Commission reveal which company or companies were awarded this contract and the amounts allotted to them? Does the Commission plan to evaluate the results obtained, the impact on the public and the level of publicity achieved?

Answer given by Mr Liikanen on behalf of the Commission

(24 February 2004)

(24 February 2004)

Information about all projects funded by the Safer Internet Action Plan, including the funding per project and the names of the beneficiaries, can be found on the Europa Web site at (http://europa.eu.int/iap).

Hotlines take reports from the public about illegal content on the Internet and pass them on to the appropriate body (police, Internet Service Provider or another hotline).

The European network of hotlines consists of the umbrella body, the Inhope Association and 16 hotlines in 14 countries which have received funding under Safer Internet, together with associates in the United Sates, Australia and South Korea.

They receive a steadily increasing number of reports from the public (91 656 reports over a six month period of which 62 % related to child pornography), and have a number of notable successes in alerting police thus enabling them to track down criminals.

Operation Marcy, in October 2003, was the result of a tip to the German police with the co-operation of Spanish and German hotlines. It cracked one of the largest global child pornography networks involving some 26,500 Internet users in 166 countries.

An evaluation of the Safer Internet Action Plan 1999-2002 by outside contractors has been communicated to the Parliament with the Commission's reaction (1). According to this report, European networking of the hotlines was considered to be extremely important and, in terms of value for money, the hotlines are seen to have been a good investment.

1

A further evaluation will take place at the end of 2004.

---

(1)  COM(2003) 653 final.

1

---
EXHIBIT 11.1

                           BAIRNCO CORPORATION
           CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
          FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED JULY 3, 1999 AND JULY 4, 1998
                               (Unaudited)


                                           1999         1998
BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:

Net income                                 $ 2,314,000  $ 1,588,000

Average common shares outstanding            7,903,000    8,746,000

Basic Earnings Per Common Share            $      0.29  $      0.18


DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:

Net income                                 $ 2,314,000  $ 1,588,000

Average common shares outstanding            7,903,000    8,746,000
Common shares issuable in respect to
 options issued to employees with a
 dilutive effect                                50,000      252,000
Total diluted common shares outstanding      7,953,000    8,998,000

Diluted Earnings Per Common Share          $      0.29  $      0.18



                                                     EXHIBIT 11.2

                           BAIRNCO CORPORATION
           CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
         FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 3, 1999 AND JULY 4, 1998
                               (Unaudited)


                                           1999         1998
BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:

Net income                                 $ 4,584,000  $ 3,784,000

Average common shares outstanding            8,052,000    8,825,000

Basic Earnings Per Common Share            $      0.57  $      0.43


DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:

Net income                                 $ 4,584,000  $ 3,784,000

Average common shares outstanding            8,052,000    8,825,000
Common shares issuable in respect to
 options issued to employees with a
 dilutive effect                                37,000      260,000
Total diluted common shares outstanding      8,089,000    9,085,000

Diluted Earnings Per Common Share          $      0.57  $      0.42
D ISMISS; and Opinion Filed June 5 , 2014. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00536

- CR

TOMMY RAY VIDAL , Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11

- 35123

- W



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Fillmore, Evans, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Lewis Tommy Ray Vidal pleaded guilty to possession of methamphetamine in an amount of
four grams or more but less than 200 grams. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the trial court
sentenced appellant to five years’ imprisonment. Appellant waived his right to appeal as part of
the plea agreement. See Blanco v. State , 18 S.W.3d 21 8, 219

– 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). The

trial court certified that appellant does not have the right to appeal. See id. ; see also Dears v.

State
, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)

. W e dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Do Not Publish T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47

140536F.U05 /David Lewis/ DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE– 2

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

TOMMY RAY VIDAL, Appellant

No. 05

- 14

- 00536

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11

- 35123

- W. Opinion delivered by Justice Lewis, Justices Fillmore and Evans participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 5 th day of June , 2014.

/David Lewis/ DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE
Exhibit 23.1
CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
          We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements: (1) on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1992 Stock Option Plan (No.33-96458), the Italian Employees Warrant Program (No. 333-87743), the SwedishEmployees Warrant Program (No. 333-87741), the 1998 Nonstatutory Stock OptionPlan (No. 333-87739), the 1997 Incentive And Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan(No. 333-87735), the German Employees Warrant Program (No. 333-87733), the 1992Stock Option Plan (No. 333-87731), the Erick Blachno Stock Option (No.333-44540), the 1997 Incentive And Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan (No.333-47896), the 2000 MRV Communications, Inc. Stock Option Plan For EmployeesOf Optronics International Corp. (No. 333-47898), the 2000 MRV Communications,Inc. Stock Option Plan For Employees Of Astroterra Corporation. (No.333-47900), the 2000 MRV Communications, Inc. Stock Option Plan For EmployeesOf Fiber Optic Communications, Inc. (No. 333-55328), the 2000 MRVCommunications, Inc. Stock Option Plan For Employees Of Quantum Optech, Inc.(No. 333-55334), the 2001 MRV Communications, Inc. Stock Option Plan ForEmployees Of Appointech, Inc. (No. 333-71180), the MRV Communications, Inc.2002 International Stock Option Plan (No. 333-81954), the MRV Communications,Inc. 2002 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan For Employees Of Luminent, Inc. (No.333-81958), the Luminent Inc. Amended And Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan AndEric Blachno Stock Option Agreement (No. 333-81950), the 1997 Incentive AndNonstatutory Stock Option Plan (No. 333-81956), the Candy Glazer Stock OptionAgreement (No. 333-84784), and Non-Director and Non-Executive OfficerConsolidated Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (No. 333-107109); (2) on Form S-3filings No. 333-86163, 333-17537, 333-44534, 333-71178, 333-106169 and333-106177; and (3) on Form S-4 filing No. 333-44536; of MRV Communications,Inc. of our report dated February 5, 2003, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of MRV Communications, Inc. included in the Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Los Angeles, California
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 7, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 32880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13976]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 1

RIN 3038-AD46

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 240

[Release No. 33-9204A; 34-64372A; File No. S7-16-11]
RIN 3235-AK65

Further Definition of ``Swap,'' ``Security-Based Swap,'' and 
``Security-Based Swap Agreement''; Mixed Swaps; Security-Based Swap 
Agreement Recordkeeping

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission; Securities and Exchange 
Commission.

ACTION: Joint proposed rules; proposed interpretations; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities 
and Exchange Commission published a document in the Federal Register of 
May 23, 2011 that referenced an incorrect RIN and an incorrect cite in 
an authority citation. This correction is being published to correct 
both the RIN and the authority citation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: CFTC: Julian E. Hammar, Assistant 
General Counsel, at 202-418-5118, jhammar@cftc.gov, Mark Fajfar, 
Assistant General Counsel, at 202-418- 6636, mfajfar@cftc.gov, or David 
E. Aron, Counsel, at 202-418-6621, daron@cftc.gov, Office of General 
Counsel, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 
1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581; SEC: Matthew A. Daigler, 
Senior Special Counsel, at 202-551-5578, Cristie L. March, Attorney-
Adviser, at 202-551-5574, or Leah M. Drennan, Attorney-Adviser, at 202-
551-5507, Division of Trading and Markets, or Michael J. Reedich, 
Special Counsel, or Tamara Brightwell, Senior Special Counsel to the 
Director, at 202-551- 3500, Division of Corporation Finance, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-7010.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of May 23, 2011, in FR Doc. 2011-11008, on 
page 29818, in the 10th line of the first column, the Security and 
Exchange Commission's RIN is corrected to read as noted above.
    In the Federal Register of May 23, 2011, in FR Doc. 2011-11008, on 
page 29888, the authority citation in the second column reads as 
follows:

    Authority:  7 U.S.C. 1a, 2, 5, 6, 6a, 6b, 6c, 6d, 6e, 6f, 6g, 
6h, 6i, 6j, 6k, 6l, 6m, 6n, 6o, 6p, 6r, 7, 7a, 7b, 8, 9, 10, 12, 
12a, 12c, 13a, 13a-1, 16, 16a, 21, 23, and 24.

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
David A. Stawick,
Secretary. Securities and Exchange Commission.
    Dated: June 1, 2011.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-13976 Filed 6-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P; 8011-01-P
```
•

Mal •••n • rot- •••• • " •

•

iminuarmil

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

WASHINGTON 15, D. C.

21 AVG t96.

MEMORANDUM FOR Director, National Reconnaissance Office

SUBJECT: Procedure for Initiation of

Overflight Reconnaissance

REFERENCE: 19 July memo from D/NRO to

DDR/CIA, BYE-1708-62

This memorandum is in response to and serves to record my

agreement with the reference memorandum with its attached flow chart.

However, with regard to submitting proposals for additional missions for

on-going programs for Special Group approval, I believe it is impracticable in terms of time for such proposed actions to be forwarded through

the NRO. In an earlier conversation with you I bad understood that you

would be concerned in this instance only when some new factor were involved such as the use of a new sub-system or a proposed mission which

would involve new or unusual risk or sensitivity. I am informed by

Mr. Cunningham, Acting Assistant Director for the Office of Special

Activities, that in his conversation with you on 31 July 1962 you were

still of this view.

Accordingly, I would propose the revision of the penultimate

sentence of the third paragraph of the reference be revised to read: "In

the case of on-going programs, it will be the responsibility of the Project

Director for a given program to consult with the Director, NRO where

new factors axe involved such as the introduction of a new sub-system or

where new and unusual risk or sensitivity has arisen. In the absence of

such new or unusual developments, the D/NRO will look to the specific

Project Director to exercise the NRO responsibility as a means of expediting the movement of recommended actions for an on-going program

to the Special Group for approval."

Deputy Director

(Research)

3513-62

Copy / of 6

•

1171: it

sa. .

":• f • : •