alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,342,782
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,723,488
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 33,087,290
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      13,733,393
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        13,673,673
<LOANS>                                     86,295,845
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,287,058
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             141,918,930
<DEPOSITS>                                 104,371,928
<SHORT-TERM>                                12,255,880
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,302,316
<LONG-TERM>                                  9,175,564
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,328,041
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,485,201
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             141,918,930
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              7,796,758
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,767,325
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            10,564,083
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,091,958
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,217,816
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        5,346,267
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  250,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,468,231
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,244,041
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,244,041
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,450,048
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.12
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,571,661
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,596,613
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  572,569
<RECOVERIES>                                    13,014
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,287,058
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,287,058
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-K of Caraco Pharmaceutical
Laboratories, Ltd. (Caraco) for the year ended March 31, 2009 (the Report),
the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their
respective knowledge and belief, that: (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Caraco. /s/ Daniel
 H. MovensDaniel H.
 MovensChief
 Executive Officer  /s/ Mukul
 RathiMukul RathiInterim
 Chief Financial OfficerJune 10,
 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           7,743
<SECURITIES>                                     3,150
<RECEIVABLES>                                      208
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,222
<PP&E>                                              12
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (1)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,661
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,919
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,250
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,480
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,661
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   175
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      4
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  4
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (48)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (44)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        

</TABLE>
SCWC-19-0000329

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

KENNETH M. SKAHAN, Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant,

vs. STUTTS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Respondent/Employers-Appellee,

and FIRST INSURANCE COMPANY OF HAWAII, LTD., Respondent/Insurance Carrier-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-19-0000329; CASE NO. AB 2015-372(M) and DCD (7-14-45072))

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Reck tenwald, C.J., Nak ayama, Mc Kenna, Po llack, an d Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/claimant-appellant Kenneth M. Skahan’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on July 10, 2019, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, August 2, 2019. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-19-0000329 02-AUG-2019 07:51 AM
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Dataware Technologies, Inc. on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-27007 and 333-39633) and
Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-56691, 333-56693, 33-70498, 33-70500, 33-79824, 333-
04487 and 333-28545) of our report on the financial statements of Sovereign Hill
Software, Inc. (the "Company") for the years ended December 31, 1997 and
December 31, 1996, dated May 8, 1998, except for the information in the third
paragraph of Note 2 and the second paragraph of Note 12, as to which the date is
December 15, 1998 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph which indicates that there are matters that raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern),
appearing in this Form 8-K/A Amendment No. 1 to the Form 8-K Current Report
dated January 14, 1999.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
-------------------------
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 11, 1999
|              |  |                
|------------- |  | ---------------
|CERTIFICATION |  | Exhibit (31)(2)



I, William T. Hanelly certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of C-COR.net Corp.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                  |  |                                           
|----------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|                  | 
|Date: May 7, 2004 |  | /s/ William T. Hanelly                    
|                  |  | William T. Hanelly Chief Financial
Officer
99-613.

#### State v. Jones.

Montgomery App. No. 17382. *Sua sponte,*cause consolidated with 99-769, *supra.*

Resnick, J., not participating.
Exhibit 21.1
 CARVER BANCORP, INC.
Subsidiaries of Registrant
 Ownership
    
    
    State ofPercentage
    
    
    Incorporation
    
    DescriptionCarver Bancorp, Inc.
    
    
    
    
    
    Delaware
    
    Holding CompanyCarver Federal Savings Bank
    
    
    100
    %
    
    USA
    
    Federal Savings BankCSFB Credit Corp.
    
    
    100
    %
    
    New York
    
    InactiveCSFB Realty Corp.
    
    
    100
    %
    
    New York
    
    Real Estate Holding CompanyCarver Asset Corp.
    
    
    100
    %
    
    Delaware
    
    Real Estate Investment TrustCarver Community Development
Corporation
    
    
    100
    %
    
    Delaware
    
    Community DevelopmentSub CDE 1, LLC
    
    
    99.99
    %*
    
    Delaware
    
    Lending Vehicle for NMTCSub CDE 2, LLC
    
    
    99.99
    %*
    
    Delaware
    
    Lending Vehicle for NMTCSub CDE 3, LLC
    
    
    99.99
    %*
    
    Delaware
    
    Lending Vehicle for NMTCSub CDE 4, LLC
    
    
    99.99
    %*
    
    Delaware
    
    Lending Vehicle for NMTCSub CDE 5, LLC
    
    
    99.99
    %*
    
    Delaware
    
    Lending Vehicle for NMTCSub CDE 6, LLC
    
    
    99.99
    %*
    
    Delaware
    
    Lending Vehicle for NMTCSub CDE 7, LLC
    
    
    99.99
    %*
    
    Delaware
    
    Lending Vehicle for NMTCSub CDE 8, LLC
    
    
    99.99
    %*
    
    Delaware
    
    Lending Vehicle for NMTCSub CDE 9, LLC
    
    
    99.99
    %*
    
    Delaware
    
    Lending Vehicle for NMTCSub CDE 10, LLC
    
    
    99.99
    %*
    
    Delaware
    
    Lending Vehicle for NMTCSub CDE 11, LLC
    
    
    99.99
    %*
    
    Delaware
    
    Lending Vehicle for NMTCSub CDE 12, LLC
    
    
    99.99
    %*
    
    Delaware
    
    Lending Vehicle for NMTCSub CDE 13, LLC
    
    
    99.99
    %*
    
    Delaware
    
    InactiveAlhambra Holdings Corp.
    
    
    100
    %
    
    Delaware
    
    Inactive
 *
    
    Also owned 0.01% by Carver Community Development Corporation.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IN RE: HELEN KATAKIS,

Appellant

______________________ 

2016-1695

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No. 

85901018.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

HENRY JOSEPH CITTONE, Cittone & Chinta LLP, New 

York, NY, and GREGORY DOLIN, University of Baltimore 

School of Law, Baltimore, MD, argued for appellant. 

MARY BETH WALKER, Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for 

appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K.

KELLEY, THOMAS W. KARUSE, CHRISTINA HIEBER. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 
 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and TARANTO,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 March 20, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 23.15**

 

**Consent of Laila Sedore**

 

I consent to the inclusion in this annualreport on Form 40-F of North American Palladium Ltd., which is being filedwith the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of references to myname and to references to my involvement in the preparation of technicalinformation relating to the Shebandowan West Property, Ontario, included in the2007 Annual Information Form of North American Palladium Ltd., dated March 31,2008 (the “AIF”).

 

I also consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form F-10 (Nos. 333-147126,333-146513 and 333-133668) of the references to my name and the above-mentionedinformation in the AIF.

 

Dated this 31 day of March, 2008.

 

 
|   |    /s/ Laila Sedore |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
| Name:  | Laila Sedore             |   |

 

----
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/17

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL
First Amendment To Severance Agreement


 Exhibit 10.5 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT 
 This First Amendment (the “Amendment”) effective
as of September 19, 2008 to the Severance Agreement, dated as of April 6, 2007 (the “Agreement”), between Nobel Learning Communities, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (“Nobel Learning”), and G. Lee Bohs (Executive”).

 Background 
 Executive
is a member of Nobel Learning’s senior leadership team and is expected to be actively involved in executing Nobel Learning’s plans for continued growth and success. 
 In an effort to acknowledge Executive’s important role in this process and to provide Executive with a degree of income and benefit protection in
the event [his/her] employment is terminated, Executive and Nobel Learning entered into the Agreement. 
 Executive and Nobel Learning are
amending the Agreement to conform the Agreement to the original intent of the parties. 
 All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have
the meaning set forth in the Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and promises
contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, Nobel Learning and Executive hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Section 3(i)
of the Agreement, “Limitation on Benefits Contingent Upon Change in Control,” is hereby deleted in its entirety. 
 2. All of the
other terms and conditions of the Agreement, not inconsistent with the terms of this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment the date and year first written above. 
  

			
	NOBEL LEARNING COMMUNITIES, INC.
		
	By	 	 /s/ George Bernstein

	Name:	 	George Bernstein
	Title:	 	President and CEO



			
	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	 /s/ G. Lee Bohs

	Print Name:	 	G. Lee Bohs
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1440 

To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to exclude a loan secured by a 

non-owner occupied 1- to 4-family dwelling from the definition of a 

member business loan, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2015 

Mr. WYDEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to exclude a loan 

secured by a non-owner occupied 1- to 4-family dwelling 

from the definition of a member business loan, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Credit Union Residen5 tial Loan Parity Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1440 IS

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF A NON-OWNER OCCUPIED 1- TO 4- 

2 FAMILY DWELLING. 

3 (a) REMOVAL FROM MEMBER BUSINESS LOAN LIMI4 TATION.—Section 107A(c)(1)(B)(i) of the Federal Credit 

5 Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1757a(c)(1)(B)(i)) is amended by 

6 striking ‘‘that is the primary residence of a member’’. 

7 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act 

8 or the amendment made by this Act shall preclude the 

9 National Credit Union Administration from treating an 

10 extension of credit that is fully secured by a lien on a 1- 

11 to 4-family dwelling that is not the primary residence of 

12 a member as a member business loan for purposes other 

13 than the member business loan limitation requirements 

14 under section 107A of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 

15 U.S.C. 1757a). 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Anonymous.

*Tha fifteen*days before the term, in which appeals mutt be filed in the Superior Court, must b>~ clear of the day of filing the papers and of the first day of the term; at all events, of the first day of the term.

In this case, it was moved by *General Davie,*that, the appeal should not be. received, títere nol being fifteen days between the filing of die appeal papers a;;:.’ the first day of ?■ e, next term, and lie cited 2 *lil. Rep.*922, 1 *Sira. 407*— as a similar case being founded upon a rule of court, which had the words “at least,” in the sam: manner as the act of *1777,*ch» 2, *sec.*84, where the, expression is, that the record of the suit shall be delivered to the clerk of fiie Superior Court, at lea-<i fifteen days before, the sitting of the term. In the case in Strange, one day was *464|Ui]c] f0 j)e inclusive and the other exclusive ; and if that computation prevail in the present instance, the record was brought up roo late : for there are not fifteen days before the term, unless the dav of filing and the first day of the term are both included.

*E contra*

Williams cited *Salk.*599 *pi.*7- 2 *Stra. 765.*

*Per curiam*

Wju.iams absent. Whether the fifteen days are to be accounted inclusive or exclusive, depends not upon any practice, of the British courts, but upon the meaning and design of our own act, which seems to have been, that the appellee after coming to the clerk’s office, and finding the appeal lodged there, might have fifteen days for travelling to the most distant part of the State, to procure attendance of witnesses, and returning lo the court, and in otherwise preparing for the trial $ but if the fifteen days are to be accounted inclusively, he will have hut thirteen days allowed for those purposes. The fifteenth day is employed in travelling to the office and getting process, and the first day of the term he must be present in court ready for his trial, if we allow one of them to be inclusive, and the other exclusive, there will remain hut fourteen days. There should be fifteen clear days— at all events, the first day of the term must be e.xcludud. The case was adjourned to search for precedents on the application of the appellant’s counsel.

Note. — Overruled, *Anonymous, post*462.