alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
VIIIS,Rous- ' 1 • mob,

C L SYSTEM

18INATIONALRECONNAISSANCEOFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C. 161311,W16911

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR November 30, 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

SUBJECT: Modification of the Security Controls for

the Products of Photographic Reconnaissance

Satellites

Dr. Kissinger's letter of November 23 forwarding the

President's approval to decompartment certain photographic

reconnaissance satellite products is certain to cause some

confusion among people presently cleared for access to the

BYEMAN or TALENT-KEYHOLE compartments. It is anticipated

that it will be some time before guidelines will be furnished

relating to the exact details of the decompartmentation and

redefinition of products and program aspects which must remain

compartmented. Foremost, perhaps, is inadvertent acknowledgement at the SECRET level of our high-altitude SIGINT collectors--

which was specifically excluded from the decompartmentation

proposal.

Until new guidelines are furnished by USIB, I believe it

is necessary to caution all cleared people in the DOD and have

prepared the letter at the right for your signature.

RECOMMENDATION: That you sign the letter at the right.

11111111,

IMIZNT=REYHOLB-- -

awn /

Mr :re= i ea

c

MP-SECRET- as

pA SONY SO MICLEMMY ON WIP MT. Gss

es

73's.
OFFICE OFf THE SECRETARY OF OffENSE

WASHINGTON, LC. 10301

MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR, DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

SUBJECT: Mbdification of the Sécurity'Controls for

the Products of Photographic Reconnaissance

Satellites

REFERENCE: Memorandum from Dr. Kissinger, subject as above,

November 23, 1973 (TS #203364)

I wish to insure that the decompartmentation of photographic

satellite reconnaissance products proceeds strictly according

to the provisions of the referenced letter. Specifically, I

note that the President has approved SECRET acknowledgement of

only the U.S. photographic satellite reconnaissance program,

and partial decompartmentation of the photographic product.

It should be strictly understood by all DOD people who are

cleared for either BYEMAN or TALENT-KEYHOLE information that

the Presidential approval does not permit acknowledgement of

the United States SIGINT satellite program, nor may photographic product be downgraded beyond the existing USIB

guidance for sanitization and decontrol until such time as

the Director of Central Intelligence approves specific guidelines. Please insure that this information is conveyed immediately to all people in DOD who are BYEMAN or TALENT-KEYHOLE

cleared.

James R. Schlesinger

cc: Service Secretaries

Director, Central Intelligence

Director, National . Security Agency

Assistant Secretary of Defense

(Intelligence)

• •

NnLa vuk GORY at MIAOW ON V. Off.

EEYHOtESYSTEMS JOINTLi JOE-SECRETSOMML aAISIP"011iME OF

maw

MOM

CM& Copy-- of _Copiss
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Paul Burgess, Chief Executive Officer of Science Dynamics Corporation,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Science Dynamics
Corporation for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

      (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made
known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

      (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions);

      (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

November 20, 2006

/s/ Paul Burgess
-----------------------
Paul Burgess
Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1904

TERRY H. CAPONE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THE CITY OF COLUMBIA, Employer; COMPANION THIRD PARTY 

ADMINISTRATORS; SOUTH CAROLINA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION 

COMMISSION; DORIS MCCUBBINS, In her individual capacity; HENRY GENE 

MCCASKILL, In his individual capacity; DR. MICHAEL GREEN; RICHLAND 

COUNTY OMBUDSMAN’S OFFICE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:19-cv-02490-CMC)

Submitted: March 23, 2021 Decided: March 26, 2021

Before THACKER, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry H. Capone, Appellant Pro Se. Jacqueline Marie Pavlicek, OFFICE OF THE CITY 

ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Terry H. Capone appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of 

the magistrate judge and dismissing Capone’s employment action for failure to state a 

claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Capone v. City of Columbia, No. 3:19-cv-02490-

CMC (D.S.C. Aug. 17, 2020). We deny Capone’s motion to hold this appeal in abeyance. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
2006 Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Award Agreement



 Exhibit 10.3 
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 BANKFINANCIAL CORPORATION 
 2006 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT 
 WHEREAS, BANKFINANCIAL
Corporation (the “Company”) and ROBERT J. O’SHAUGHNESSY (the “Participant”) have entered into that certain Restricted Stock Award Agreement dated as of
September 5, 2006 (the “Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Participant desire to amend certain
provisions of the Agreement in order to provide for the ending of the Restricted Period upon the Participant’s attainment of age 70 rather than Participant’s Retirement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, effective as of the 20th day of October, 2008, the Agreement is hereby amended in the following particulars:

 1. Paragraph 3(a) of the Agreement is amended by deleting the existing language and replacing it with the following new Paragraph
3(a): 
 “(a) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 3, the Restricted Period shall expire immediately upon
the earliest of the following events to occur: (i) a Change in Control that occurs on or before the Participant’s Termination of Service; (ii) the Participant’s Termination of Service as a result of the Participant’s Death
or Disability; (iii) the Participant’s attainment of age 70; (iv) the Participant’s employment or consulting arrangement is terminated by the Company other than for Cause, or (v) the Participant terminates his employment for
Good Reason (for purposes of this Agreement, the terms “Cause” and “Good Reason” shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the applicable employment agreement between the Participant and the Company or its
Subsidiary).” 
 2. Paragraph 3(b) of the Agreement is amended by deleting the existing language and replacing it with the
following new Paragraph 3(b): 
 “In the event the Participant’s Termination of Service other than due to Death or Disability occurs
prior to the expiration of one or more Restricted Periods, the Participant shall forfeit all rights, title and interest in and to any Installment(s) of Covered Shares still subject to a Restricted Period as of the Participant’s Termination of
Service date.” 
 [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed as of the date first above written.

  

							
	BANKFINANCIAL CORPORATION	 		  	
			
	  
	 		  	  

	By:	 	  
	 		  	ROBERT J. O’SHAUGHNESSY
	Its:	 	  
	 		  	

  

 2
# CE2004084EN.01009301.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/93 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/93

---

(2004/C 84 E/0118)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3726/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject:   Update concerning the funds for the SAVE II programme for the municipality of Pesaro

Subject:

With reference to question E-0968/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of Pesaro (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the SAVE II programme, the Commission replied on 25 April 2003 to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

1

Can the Commission state whether, since then and up to the present, it has received any SAVE II projects from that municipality?

---

(1)  OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

1

---
Order entered August 11, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00673-CV

HUNTER-KELSEY OF TEXAS, LLC AND STRONGHILL TEXAS, LLC,

Appellants

V.

BAPA BROOKLYN 2004, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-03081-E

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ August 7, 2020 agreed motion to extend time 

to file their opening brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellants’ 

opening brief be filed no later than August 24, 2020.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
USCIB: 29.20/14 

25 May 1955 

MEMORANDlM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: COMINT Units in Germany. 

The enclosed memorandum containing the views of the CIA representative in Germany is forwarded for infonnation at the request or the 

CIA member of USCIB. 

Enclosure 

CIA Memo dtd 24 May 1955. 

USCIB: ';f).20/14 

TOP SECRET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-20-2014 pursuant to E .0. 1352a 

24 
. ~ 

TQP~ 

REF ID:A60279 

'fOP SECRET 9 

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

Ml!MORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

SUBJECT: COMINT Units in Germany 

24 MAY 1955 

l. The Senior Representative in Germ.any or the Director of 

Central Intelligence has been queried as to his opinion on the 

advisability of possible U. S. action parallel to that planned 

by the British, to advise the West Germans of the 11size, location, 

and purpose" of U. S. COMINT units in Germany. 

2. General Truscott 1s views have been received. In brief, 

he recommends that no action or this nature be taken at this time 

for the reason that: 

a. COMINT units do not differ from infantry units, signal 

units, etc., so far as the Germans are concerned, and 

it would be a mistake to set a precedent for negotiating 

separately each type of military activity. 

b. The Status of Forces Agreement covers all troops, including 

CCJiIINT, and special German permission is not required to 

maintain the COMINT troops in Germany. Accordingly, to 

inform the Germans of these particular units might reopen 

a question which is already settled. 

3. General Truscott also comments on the difference in size 

and character of the British and U. S. COM.INT forces: the British 

having approximately 600 COM.INT troops in mobile units, adaptable 

to being incorporated in NATO, whereas the U. S. forces number 10,000 

in fixed stations, which must remain outside NATO control; and merely 

infonning the Germans of the existence of U. s. COM.INT units would 

not solve the problem. of keeping COMINT units outside NATO control. 

4. General Truscott recommends that LSIB be asked to refrain 

from any action with the Germans which might prejudice the U. S. 

position until the problem has been fully studied. 

(Sj rmed) 

for 

HUNTINGTON D. SHELDON 

CIA Member, USCIB 

Enclosure with USCIB 29.20/14 dtd 25 May 1955. 

TOP SECRET 

OGA
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1657 

To amend the Reclamation Safety of Dams Act of 1978. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2015 

Mr. BARRASSO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Reclamation Safety of Dams Act of 1978. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dams Accountability, 

5 Maintenance, and Safety Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL PROJECT BENE7 FITS. 

8 The Reclamation Safety of Dams Act of 1978 (43 

9 U.S.C. 506 et seq.) is amended— 

10 (1) in section 3, by striking ‘‘Construction’’ and 

11 inserting ‘‘Except as provided in section 5B, con12 struction’’; and 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1657 IS

1 (2) by inserting after section 5A (43 U.S.C. 

2 509) the following: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 5B. ADDITIONAL PROJECT BENEFITS. 

4 ‘‘Notwithstanding section 3, if the Secretary deter5 mines that additional project benefits, including additional 

6 conservation storage capacity, are feasible and not incon7 sistent with the purposes of this Act, the Secretary is au8 thorized to develop additional project benefits through the 

9 construction of new or supplementary works on a project 

10 in conjunction with the Secretary’s activities under section 

11 2 and subject to the conditions described in the feasibility 

12 study, provided that— 

13 ‘‘(1) the Secretary determines that developing 

14 additional project benefits through the construction 

15 of new or supplementary works on a project will pro16 mote more efficient management of water and 

17 water-related facilities; 

18 ‘‘(2) the feasibility study pertaining to addi19 tional project benefits has been authorized pursuant 

20 to section 8 of the Federal Water Project Recreation 

21 Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 4601–18); and 

22 ‘‘(3) the costs associated with developing the 

23 additional project benefits are allocated to the au24 thorized purposes of the structure and repaid con25 sistent with all provisions of Federal Reclamation 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1657 IS

1 law (the Act of June 17, 1902, 43 U.S.C. 371 et 

2 seq.) and Acts supplemental to and amendatory of 

3 that Act.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
USCIB: 29.17/5 24 

13 April 1954 

EO 3.3(h) (2) TOP Siei1'f PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: COMINT Relations with Third Parties 1 .... ___ ___, 

Reference: USCIB 29.17/4 dated 12 April 1954. 

Further to the reference the following persons have been 

designated to serve on this Working Committee: 

DEPARTMENT 

NSA 

DEFENSE 

ARMY 

NAVY 

AIR FORCE 

CIA 

FBI 

STATE 

USCIB: 29.17/5 

REPRESENTATIVE 

Mr. William F. Friedman (Chairman) 

Mr. Randolph Zander i.- ,, ff;-'"'""" ~g~ 

Colonel John P. Kaylor .-· 

Commander John L. Holmes or · Commander Willis L. Thomas 

Colonel Charles M. Townsend 

Major William L. Rice (Alternate) 

Mr. Frank B. Rowlett 

Mr. s. D. Ellis 

Mr. Richard Curl 

Mr. John Crimmins (Alternate) 

'FOP SEC:RE'f' 

eclassified and a roved for r lease b NSA on 9-2 -2014 ursuantto E.O. 135
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


                As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of our reports dated February 15, 1999 included in
the Form 10-K of MRV Communications, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998
into (i) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of MRV Communications, Inc.
(File No. 33-96458); (ii) the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of MRV
Communications, Inc. (File No. 333-17537); and (iii) the Registration Statement
on Form S-3 of MRV Communications, Inc. (File No. 333-64017). It should be 
noted that we have not audited any financial statements of the Company 
subsequent to December 31, 1998 or performed any audit procedures subsequent to 
the date of our report.



                                                   /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

                                                   ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Los Angeles, California
March 30, 1999.
----------------
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00349-CV

Elsie Hansen, Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family & Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

NO. 02-2020-FC2-FC1, HONORABLE SUZANNE BROOKS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s motion to dismissthis appeal is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

The appeal is dismissed.

 

Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Pemberton

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: August 12, 2004
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

HomeHistoryCryptologic HistoryHistorical FiguresHistorical Figures View

# NSA Historical Figures

                Download            

# Mr. Youn P. (YP) Kim

##                 2022 Hall of Honor Inductee            

*Pueblo**Pueblo**Pueblo*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

2022Biographyhistorical figurehall of honorMr. Youn P. (YP) Kim
' .-· .. 

" 

bt>-P~ 

e1~~ 

PIP~ 

24 

USCDa J4/r/5 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

- rpl11HI - or usmaa 

SubJeota Proposed AppencUz Dl.._ ___ ____.llxb1ld.t S, 

BRU8A 

lo The mclosure ball been pnpared bJ' the u.s. OontereDCe 

Plarm!ng Camd.t;tee as a recODIUl'ldecl u.s. po•1tion on tbe above 

aub.1eeto 

2o fh1• proposal 1s .tonudecl with a ri.ew to conaideat1o11 at 

the B1ght.J'eaecond USCI8 meetingo 

&lcloaure 

hopoaecl Appmd1x DI ,. Bdd.b:Lt S, BRUSA ._ ____ __. 

USCIB1 '14/rlS 

Declassified and approved for re!ease by NSA on 03-05-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

TOP SECRET 

u-- -

--
\ ;.-r' ~ \ \' 

'!OP ~a;&1~r • ~im INFQRMATD 

MEMORANDUM FOR Tllli MEMml1S OF USCIB 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

SUBJF.CT: Revision ot Appendix D, ._I ___ ___.I Exhibit\'' BRUSA 

Agreement 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Incl: 

J. N. 

.~ WENGm 

Rear Admiral, US Navy 

Chairman• BRUSA Conference Planning Committee 

Exhibit s, t 

Append.ix D L-or----mro.......,SA-.-__. 

TOP SECRET 
' 

. . . . . . . 

AFSA Fann 78~-Cn. 6 !"' ~1. . . 

.i'FPUiDIX D 

nri.t FT/P /Pl4 Jan 53 

l f' EI'D~l D . 

Exhibit 5 • Sheet 1 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
.. 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

. •. ~ • J I APPENDIX D 

Exhibit 5 - Sheet 2 

' ' 
. . . . . 

. 

m fll!eru •OJP'.1§#,>~it,~. '"' .SEet'lf.:::r'fY Yl'!PeBtl 'ffCl! 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

1PI"E.l1JIX D PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Exh'b' 1 1 t :;; ~ - Sheet 3 

\\ 

I~ _I 

• 

A.FSA Form 781-C13 6 Jul 51 

·-. . .. .-...-
·. , . ·. ~QPFQip:1£6BOl1Te ~iCUli:I'l'I ~- t.J£:J '--A .L'-£:J~ .. -- _- EO 3.3(h)(2) ------ - PL 86.:36/50 USC 3605 - -- --

• -.-.if··-:-

' 

.! 

AFSA Fona 781-C13 6 Jul 51 

•aaEs 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

AGES 
• •@~~~- - ~mRrT~ :mm~pFQJQi~°i2T6 E.03.3(h)(2) .:-0 U .l.:.J """' .&. '-.l.:.J ~ PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

TOP SECRET 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 ,. .. ,. 

• 

AFSA Fann 781-C13 6 Jul 51 
.. OJPSFJeltE~e EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 ~~ 

• • sECRE'l' - s1suRU'Y nlfeltlt. r:roN 

• 

AFSA Fonn 781-C13 6 Jul 51 

I • 

10P SEGllET COl'llOL •• B•tP-''6; 4 

~~~=-=1 :J• 

TOP SECRET 

--,- -- .. ~ ~ 

I 
........... 

,,. "' I I .. 

. . " . 

FSA Fann 781-C13 6 Jul 51 

.. ' REF ID:A65052 

•oP SECRE'ffEO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC.3605