alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   7-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998             JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-17-1998             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998             JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,197                  21,969
<SECURITIES>                                     3,082                   7,020
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                  11,410
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                   6,608
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,479                  52,160
<PP&E>                                             527                   6,263
<DEPRECIATION>                                      27                     975
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,081                  57,912
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              138                  11,710
<BONDS>                                              0                   4,054
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,621                  55,771
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             7                      23
<OTHER-SE>                                       (685)                (13,646)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,081                  57,912
<SALES>                                              0                  11,330
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                  11,330
<CGS>                                                0                   8,486
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                   8,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   793                  22,159
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                     559
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (693)                (18,756)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (693)                (18,756)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (693)                (18,756)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.55)                  (6.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.55)                  (6.03)



</TABLE>
USCIB: 5.2/92 llA:NBl:d!i 'IIA 6CIUN'f 0II:Aiftfl!itS ONL¥ 

9 May 1955 

SBOfeJ:' - l::J. S. Em eMLY 

UNITED STATES COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE BOARD 

AGENDA FOR 

One Hundred Fifteenth Meeting at 1030, on Friday, 

13 May 1955, in the Projection Room, 

East Building, CIA, Washington, D.'C. 

Mr. Allen W. Dulles, Chairman 

24 

P ARI' I - AGENDA I'l'mS 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

EO 3.3(h) (2) 

Date of Initial Subject 

Consideration Number Subject Submitted by 

1~ May 1955 5.2/ 1. Approval of Final Minutes Se.cretariat 

or the 114th Meeting. 

All Members are requested to remain after adjournment of the meeting for 

an Executive Session. 

PART II - BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON AGJ!NDA ITEMS 

Item No. Subject and Summary 

1. Final Minutes or the 114th Meeting. Corrections to the 

tentative version or subject minutes have been received and 

circulated to all Members. Final Minutes are now subject to 

Board approval. 

USCIB: 5. 2/92 ltkNBfJ!l VIA 6CMM 6IWUm.8 QJU,Y 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 08-18-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

SECRET
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
                                                                                


                                  LYCOS, INC.

               COMPUTATION OF SHARES USED IN COMPUTING BASIC AND
                    DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE (2)
                                  (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        THREE MONTHS            THREE MONTHS
                                                                           ENDED                    ENDED
                                                                      OCTOBER 31, 1998        OCTOBER 31, 1997
                                                                      ----------------        ----------------
                                                                         (Restated)
<S>                                                                  <C>                      <C>

  Common stock, beginning of period................................         35,991,452              27,593,240
  Weighted average common shares
    issued during the period, net..................................          5,918,498                 592,620
  Common stock options and warrants
      using the modified treasury method...........................                                  1,178,092
                                                                          ------------            ------------ 
                                                                            41,909,950              29,363,952
                                                                          ============            ============
Net income (loss)..................................................       $ (3,595,933)           $    107,480
                                                                          ============            ============
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (1)..................       $      (0.09)           $       0.00
                                                                          ============            ============
</TABLE>

(1)  Diluted net income (loss) per share was not materially different from basic
     net loss per share.

(2)  Reflects the effect of a two-for-one common stock split payable to
     shareholders of record on August 14, 1998.  All share and per share amounts
     presented in the condensed consolidated financial statements have been
     restated to reflect the stock split.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
<TABLE>


                                        LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<CAPTION>

SUBSIDIARY                            LOCATION              BUSINESS          DATE                % OWNED

<S>                                   <C>                   <C>               <C>                 <C>
Research Engineers, Europe Ltd.       Bristol, UK           Software Sales    1986                100%

Research Engineers, Pvt Ltd.          Calcutta, India       Software Sales    1986                100%

Research Engineers, GmbH              Herne, Germany        Software Sales    November, 1995*     100%

Research Engineers, SARL              Dourdan, France       Software Sales    October, 1998       100%

R-Cube Technologies, Inc.             San Jose, CA          IT Services       February, 1999*     100%

PacSoft Incorporated                  Woodinville, WA       Software Sales    March, 1999*        100%

NetGuru Systems, Inc.                 Waltham, MA           IT Services       September, 1999*    100%

NetGuru Consulting, Inc.              Waltham, MA           IT Services       September, 1999*    100%

e-Destinations, Inc.                  Artesia, CA           e-commerce        January, 2000*      100%

Allegria Software, Inc.               Yorba Linda, CA       Software Sales    April, 2000*        100%

NetGuru India Pvt. Ltd.               Calcutta, India       e-commerce        May, 2000*          100%


----------------------------------------
* Acquired; balance of subsidiaries were created.

</TABLE>
# CE2004078EN.01033101.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/331 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/331

---

(2004/C 78 E/0348)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3884/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(16 December 2003)

Subject:   Alcatel Italia: suspected infringement of rules on funding granted by the EU

Subject:

It emerged from a meeting held with the trade union delegations from Alcatel Italia S.p.A. in Brussels in November 2003 that the company has benefited in the past from favourable terms for funding production activities in depressed areas of Italy, in accordance with the terms of Italian Law No 488/92, by means of EU co-financing.

This law obliges the beneficiary company to respect, inter alia, certain parameters in terms of both increasing jobs, on the basis of the funding received, and abiding by a multiannual investment plan.

Furthermore, it would seem that Alcatel Italia has carried out an outsourcing plan, without adequately informing the workers, and contravening the ban on altering the kinds of contracts already in force.

In view of all this, can the Commission say:

| 1. | what kinds of EU funding in particular Alcatel Italia has received; |
| --- | --- |

1.

what kinds of EU funding in particular Alcatel Italia has received;

| 2. | what kind of investment plan Alcatel drew up to step up productivity and increase employment, in accordance with the provisions of Law No 488/92? |
| --- | --- |

2.

what kind of investment plan Alcatel drew up to step up productivity and increase employment, in accordance with the provisions of Law No 488/92?

| 3. | whether it considers that the granting of funding to businesses can be made subject to an ethical and social clause? |
| --- | --- |

3.

whether it considers that the granting of funding to businesses can be made subject to an ethical and social clause?

Answer given by Mr Liikanen on behalf of the Commission

(29 January 2004)

(29 January 2004)

The Commission is collecting the information it needs to answer the question. It will communicate its findings as soon as possible.

---
Exhibit 32B

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AutoInfo, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
Wunderlich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company. A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.


/s/ William Wunderlich
----------------------
William Wunderlich
Chief Financial Officer
May 12, 2004


                                       21
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ Al A. GonsoulinAl A. GonsoulinChairman and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2408

HANNA MESFIN, Petitioner, versus JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A70-662-863) Submitted: May 24, 2004 Decided: July 7, 2004 Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas A. Elliot, Fabienne Chatain, ELLIOT & MAYOCK, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wendtland, Assistant Director, Michelle R. Thresher, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Hanna Mesfin, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming, without opinion, the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her application for asylum and withholding of removal. On appeal, Mesfin raises challenges to the IJ’s determination that she failed to establish her eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence [s]he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Mesfin fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief that Mesfin seeks. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS



I, Mark Buckrey, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of STEN Corporation;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date  February 14, 2007 | /s/ Mark Buckrey       
|----------------------- | -----------------------
|                        | Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officersof Supreme Industries, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Companyfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in theForm 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presentedin the Form 10-Q.
|  DATE: May 14, 2007 |   |  /s/ Herbert M. Gardner  |
|--------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                     |   |  Herbert M. Gardner      |
|                     |   |  Chief Executive Officer |

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant toItem 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, andis not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporationlanguage in such filing.

----
Exhibit (15)



February 6, 2004



C-COR.net Corp.

State College, Pennsylvania



|Re: | Registration Statements on Form S-3 and Form S-8
|--- | ------------------------------------------------



With respect to the subject registration statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-32676, 333-75888, 333-82697, 333-87909, 333-90011 and 333-90589) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 2-95959,
33-27440, 33-35208, 33-66590, 333-02505, 333-30982, 333-43592, 333-49826, 333-61226, 333-64040, 333-65805 and 333-89067), we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated February 6, 2004 related to our review of interim financial
information.



Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the
Act), such report is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant, or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



|                        
|------------------------
|                        
|/s/ KPMG LLP            
|                        
|Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.1



April 16, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street Washington, DC 20549


Arthur Andersen LLP has represented to Cornell Companies, Inc. in a letter dated
April 16, 2002, that its audit of the consolidated financial statements of
Cornell Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001, and for the
year then ended was subject to Andersen's quality control system for the U.S.
accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the
engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards, that there
was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit and
availability of national office consultation to conduct the relevant portions of
the audit. Andersen advised us in such letter that availability of foreign
affiliates of Arthur Andersen was not relevant to this audit.



Very truly yours,



John L. Hendrix
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

1111111111111111101)011111111111 /tax6 

MA ME A BYMAN SYSTEM ONLY 

MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD JAN 2 4 1965 

SUBJECT: MOL SIGIRT Study Program 

1. Dr. Flax, Harry Davis, General Stewart and I met at 0900 this 

date and discussed the SIGINT Study Program. It was agreed that 

the following course of Utica would be followed: 

a. We should proceed with the SIGINT Pointing Study and the 

funding responsibility for that would be assigned to the MDL Program. 

b. would 

be carried on by the NRO with NRO funds. The data reduction effort 

connected therewith if it were unique to MDL would be funded by the 

MOL Program. 

c. The aircraft test program would be carried on using MOL 

funds. 

d. The management arrangements currently in effect for the 

DORIAN sensor would apply generally to the MOL SIGINT Program, i.e., 

General Martin's organization would be responsible for the technical 

work on the sensors; General Berg's office would be responsible for 

the overall MINT intearation. schedules and funding 

2. Dr. Flax indicated that the results of all of these studies would 

be handled under NRO security procedures. 

3. In later discussions with General Stewart, we tentatively agreed 

that a small SIGINT office should be established on the West Coast 

under SAFSP and under conditions similar to that established for Lt 

Colonel Rhone's sensor payload office and that these two offices 

would be kept separate at least for the time being. 

4. Further nrovision will be made fOrdinnuts from the MDL office 

into the 

devices are tailored insofar as possible to meet study 

requirements of the MOL SIGINT Program. 

.I GAD 

HARRY L. EVANS 

Brigadier General, USAF 

Vice Director, MOL Program 

DORIAN 

Page 1 of 1 page 

Copylfof 4 copies 

SAFSL NYE 21022-66 

ININIMON1011■11.11* 

03 

1 

FaTILE YM EYE EN SYSTEM ONLY X:SLLTED Fi A: j 1 TC ,TIC REGRADING; 

pop Di3 C,200.10 00:3 NOT APPLY, 

321gAj
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd.
Detroit, Michigan

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (the 1993 Stock Option Plan and the 1999 Equity
Participation Plan) (File No. 333-104429) of our report dated February 23, 2004
relating to the financial statements of Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd.
as of and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, which report is
included in Caraco's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.

                                       /s/ Rehmann Robson
                                       ------------------------------------
Troy, Michigan
March 30, 2004