alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit24.1

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appointseach of Barry F. Schwartz, Robert K. Kretzman and Michael T. Sheehan orany of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-factand agent, with full power of substitution, for him and his name, placeand stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the REVLON,INC. (the "Corporation") Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Form10-K") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing,to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation oron behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of theCorporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument,contract, document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibitsthereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including thispower of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and anyapplicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body,granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone,full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thingrequisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fullyto all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, herebyratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents,each acting alone, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do orcause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has signed these presents this 8th day of March,2005.

|  | /s/ RONALD O. PERELMAN |
|--|------------------------|

|  |
|--|
|  |  |  |
|  |

|  | RONALD O.PERELMAN |
|--|-------------------|

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                    (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intergraph Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Larry J. Laster, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350), that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


/s/ Larry J. Laster
--------------------
Larry J. Laster
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
May 12, 2003



[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Intergraph Corporation and will be retained by Intergraph
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.]
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 39 (Friday, February 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 10670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04051]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulation System

[Docket Number 2015-0005]


Information Collection Requirement; Defense Federal Acquisition 
Regulation Supplement; DFARS 234.2, Earned Value Management System.

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Notice correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects the date in a notice published in the 
Federal Register on February 23, 2015, (80 FR 9445) concerning request 
for comments on the proposed extension of OMB control number 0704-0479, 
DFARS 234.2, Earned Value Management System. The document contained an 
incorrect date for submission of public comments. The new date is April 
24, 2015.

Correction

DATES: DoD will consider all comments received by April 24, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Mark Gomersall, at (571) 372-6099.

Manuel Quinones,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
[FR Doc. 2015-04051 Filed 2-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thoratec Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended April 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, D. Keith
Grossman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ D. Keith Grossman  
 26




---



##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thoratec Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended April 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, M. Wayne
Boylston, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ M. Wayne Boylston  
 27
Motion Granted and Order filed September 11, 2018 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00509-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF C.F., JR., K.F. AND C.F., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 328th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 16-DCV-237456

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the 

termination of the parent-child relationship is at issue. The brief of appellant R.M., 

the mother, was due July 30, 2018, but was not filed. Because this court was unaware 

whether appellant, who is not represented by counsel, is indigent and entitled to 

appointed counsel, we abated the appeal on July 31, 2018, and directed the trial court 

to conduct a hearing and make findings of fact regarding appellant’s entitlement to 

and/or desire for appointed counsel.

The trial court conducted a hearing and made written findings of fact that were 

filed with this court in a supplemental clerk’s record on August 7, 2018. The trial 
2

court found (1) appellant desires to continue this appeal, and (2) appellant does not 

want a court-appointed lawyer to represent her in this appeal; she told the trial court 

she “will hire her own attorney or complete it herself.” 

On August 13, 2018, appellant filed a motion for an extension of time until 

October 31, 2018, to file her brief. We granted the motion in part until August 27, 

2018. We noted no further extensions would be granted.

Just before we issued our ruling, the court reporter filed an additional 25 

volumes of reporter’s record. 

No brief has been filed. Instead, on August 28, 2018, appellant filed another 

motion for an extension of time, but she did not specify the amount of time requested. 

She stated, “A[n] attorney agency is assisting me with filing a brief. We are almost 

complete.”

Our previous ruling setting appellant’s brief due on August 27, 2018, did not 

take into account the extensive supplemental reporter’s record. Appellant has not 

suggested her need for an extension is based on the lengthy record. However, in the 

interest of justice, we GRANT appellant’s motion for another extension until 

September 24, 2018. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED.

If appellant does not file a brief by September 24, 2018, we will dismiss this 

appeal for lack of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1) (allowing dismissal of civil 

appeal for want of prosecution if appellant does not file brief); Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(b) (allowing dismissal of civil case for want of prosecution).

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Jay A. Herman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Delphax Technologies Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Delphax Technologies Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.     Dated: August 2, 2005 By:      /s/ Jay A. Herman              Jay A. Herman         Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Caraco
Pharmaceutical Laboratories Ltd. ("Caraco") for the year ended December 31, 2002
(the "Report"), each of the undersigned of Caraco, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of our respective knowledge and belief, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Caraco.


Dated:     March 28, 2003                    /s/ Narendra N. Borkar
                                             -----------------------
                                             Narendra N. Borkar
                                             Chief Executive Officer



Dated:     March 28, 2003                    /s/ Jitendra N. Doshi
                                             -----------------------
                                             Jitendra N. Doshi
                                             Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>



                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


            WINTHROP RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATES I, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                           FORM 10-QSB MARCH 31, 2004


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winthrop Residential
Associates I, A Limited Partnership, (the "Partnership"), on Form 10-QSB for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities
and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


Date: May 13, 2004                              /s/ Michael L. Ashner
                                                --------------------------
                                                Michael L. Ashner
                                                Chief Executive Officer


Date: May 13, 2004                              /s/ Thomas C. Staples
                                                --------------------------
                                                Thomas C. Staples
                                                Chief Financial Officer

                                     1 of 1
# CE2004078EN.01090401.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/904 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/904

---

(2004/C 78 E/0955)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-4049/03

by Francesco Speroni (NI) to the Commission

(7 January 2004)

Subject:   GM products

Subject:

Is there any rule requiring establishments serving food to the public to indicate the use of products containing GM substances when the latter exceed the threshold laid down by the relevant legislation?

If not, does the Commission consider that legislation imposing such a requirement should be introduced in the interests of fair trading and food safety?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(18 February 2004)

(18 February 2004)

Neither the Community legislation in force (1) nor the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (2), which will apply from April 2004, include any obligation on restaurants or mass caterers to label as such foods obtained from, or containing ingredients obtained from, genetically modified organisms.

1

2

The new rules on labelling of foods containing GM material, and in particular Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, apply to foods delivered as such to final consumers or mass caterers. This means they apply only to foods which are delivered by mass caterers to consumers in their original state; on the other hand, the labelling obligations do not apply to foods subjected to processing or preparation.

Article 14(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 provides the possibility of adopting, through the committee procedure, specific rules concerning the information to be provided by mass caterers supplying food to final consumers. As yet, no such action has been taken.

The broader question of the information to be provided to consumers by catering establishments is being addressed as part of the general review of food labelling legislation.

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 49/2000 of 10 January 2000 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1139/98 concerning the compulsory indication on the labelling of certain foodstuffs produced by genetically modified organisms of particulars other than those provided for in Directive 79/112/EEC, OJ L 6, 11.1.2000.

1

(2)  Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed (Text with EEA relevance), OJ L 268, 18.10.2003.

2

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of HEI, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended February 26, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Timothy C. Clayton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Timothy C. ClaytonTimothy C. ClaytonChief Financial Officer
 Date: April 12, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HEI, Inc.
and will be retained by HEI, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request. 25
# CE2004084EN.01025002.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/250 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/250

---

(2004/C 84 E/0297)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3812/03

by Gabriele Stauner (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject:   Tempus programme in Romania

Subject:

On 12 November 2003, the online edition of the German magazine ‘Stern’ reported a possible case of embezzlement of Commission funds intended for the Tempus programme in Romania. According to the article, a well-known professor from Bucharest contacted OLAF with documents showing that vocational training for Romanian employees, allegedly promoted by the EU, had never taken place. However, according to ‘Stern’, OLAF neither confirmed this evidence to be true nor refuted it. Instead, it has apparently rejected the accusations and closed the case on the basis of an audit carried out on the orders of Tempus itself.

| 1. | Why did OLAF fail to acknowledge the validity as evidence of the documents supplied by the professor in its letters to him dated 26 September 2003 and 24 October 2003? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Why did OLAF fail to acknowledge the validity as evidence of the documents supplied by the professor in its letters to him dated 26 September 2003 and 24 October 2003?

| 2. | Why did OLAF rely on an audit report by the Commission management of Tempus instead of investigating the situation fully itself? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Why did OLAF rely on an audit report by the Commission management of Tempus instead of investigating the situation fully itself?

Answer given by Ms Schreyer on behalf of the Commission

(11 February 2004)

(11 February 2004)

The Commission informs the Honourable Member that the documents presented in support of the complaint in question were examined in detail, as were the other items in the file sent to the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF).

With the agreement of OLAF, and in line with the usual procedure in such cases, the Directorate-General for Education and Culture asked a London-based company to carry out an anti-fraud audit, which failed to corroborate the allegations to which the Honourable Member refers. The Commission has no reason to call into question the independence of this audit.

After these inquiries and after consulting various European, Romanian and Belgian bodies, OLAF, when closing the case, found no evidence of any fraud committed in connection with the programme in question.

However, OLAF has received further information since closing the case and has decided to reopen the investigation on a number of points. The results of this investigation will be communicated to the competent authorities according to the usual procedure.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         1,077,785
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          806,494
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            806,494
<EQUITIES>                                     147,694
<MORTGAGE>                                       6,975
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               2,239,373
<CASH>                                           5,896
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             293,257
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         450,546
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,907,951
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                320,967
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          1,477,003
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 570,027
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            4,878
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                353,725
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     99,163
<COMMON>                                        43,088
<OTHER-SE>                                     667,935
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,907,951
<PREMIUMS>                                     362,860
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             36,527
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               6,836
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   7,790
<BENEFITS>                                     126,249
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,709
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,540
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,169
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,169
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        1
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>