Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 35 / Monday, February 23, 2015 / Notices 9435 

1See Uncovered Innerspring Units from the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of Antidumping 

Duty Order, 74 FR 7661 (February 19, 2009). 

2See Request for Antidumping Administrative 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on 

Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People’s 

Republic of China, dated February 28, 2014. 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and 

Request for Revocation in Part, 79 FR 18262, 18272 

(April 1, 2014) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). 

4Comfort Coil and Creative Furniture are both 

located in market economy countries. As a result, 

the Department is examining each company’s 

respective PRC exports of subject merchandise for 

this administrative review. 

Salgado-Guzman had an interest at the 

time of his conviction. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered: 

First, from the date of this Order until 

May 5, 2024, Ernesto Salgado-Guzman, 

with last known addresses of Inmate 

Number—68370–097, Willacy County, 

Correctional Institution, 1800 Industrial 

Drive, Raymondville, TX 78580 and 

16738 Harper Blvd., Madera, CA 93638, 

and when acting for or on his behalf, his 

successors, assigns, employees, agents 

or representatives (the ‘‘Denied 

Person’’), may not, directly or indirectly, 

participate in any way in any 

transaction involving any commodity, 

software or technology (hereinafter 

collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) 

exported or to be exported from the 

United States that is subject to the 

Regulations, including, but not limited 

to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, License Exception, or 

export control document; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the Regulations, or in any 

other activity subject to the Regulations; 

or 

C. Benefitting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

that is subject to the Regulations, or in 

any other activity subject to the 

Regulations. 

Second, no person may, directly or 

indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf 

of the Denied Person any item subject to 

the Regulations; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

the Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession, or control of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States, including financing or other 

support activities related to a 

transaction whereby the Denied Person 

acquires or attempts to acquire such 

ownership, possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from the Denied Person of 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been exported from the United 

States; 

D. Obtain from the Denied Person in 

the United States any item subject to the 

Regulations with knowledge or reason 

to know that the item will be, or is 

intended to be, exported from the 

United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Denied 

Person, or service any item, of whatever 

origin, that is owned, possessed or 

controlled by the Denied Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States. For purposes of this paragraph, 

servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification or 

testing. 

Third, after notice and opportunity for 

comment as provided in Section 766.23 

of the Regulations, any other person, 

firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to Salgado-Guzman 

by ownership, control, position of 

responsibility, affiliation, or other 

connection in the conduct of trade or 

business may also be made subject to 

the provisions of this Order in order to 

prevent evasion of this Order. 

Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of 

the Regulations, Salgado-Guzman may 

file an appeal of this Order with the 

Under Secretary of Commerce for 

Industry and Security. The appeal must 

be filed within 45 days from the date of 

this Order and must comply with the 

provisions of Part 756 of the 

Regulations. 

Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be 

delivered to the Salgado-Guzman. This 

Order shall be published in the Federal 

Register. 

Sixth, this Order is effective 

immediately and shall remain in effect 

until May 5, 2024. 

Issued this 12th day of February, 2015. 

Thomas Andrukonis, 

Acting Director, Office of Exporter Services. 

[FR Doc. 2015–03590 Filed 2–20–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–928] 

Uncovered Innerspring Units From the 

People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2013– 

2014 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘the Department’’) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on uncovered 

innerspring units (‘‘innerspring units’’) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(‘‘PRC’’). The period of review is 

February 1, 2013, through January 31, 

2014. The review covers two exporters 

of subject merchandise: Comfort Coil 

Technology Sdn Bhd (‘‘Comfort Coil’’) 

and Creative Furniture & Bedding 

Manufacturing (‘‘Creative Furniture’’). 

The Department preliminarily 

determines that Comfort Coil had no 

shipments of subject merchandise 

during the POR. The Department also 

preliminarily determines that Creative 

Furniture did not cooperate to the best 

of its ability and is, therefore, applying 

adverse facts available (‘‘AFA’’) to 

Creative Furniture’s PRC-origin 

merchandise. Interested parties are 

invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan Pulongbarit, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–4031. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 19, 2009, the Department 

published in the Federal Register notice 

of an antidumping duty order on 

innerspring units from the PRC (‘‘the 

Order’’).1 On February 28, 2014, Leggett 

& Platt, Inc. (‘‘Petitioner’’) submitted a 

request for the Department to conduct 

an administrative review of the Order 

that examines Comfort Coil’s and 

Creative Furniture’s exports of subject 

merchandise made during the POR.2 On 

April 1, 2014, the Department published 

in the Federal Register a notice of 

initiation of this administrative review 

of the Order concerning Comfort Coil’s 

and Creative Furniture’s POR exports of 

subject merchandise.3 4

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is uncovered innerspring units 


Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
9436 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 35 / Monday, February 23, 2015 / Notices 

5For a complete description of the scope of the 

subject antidumping duty order, see Memorandum 

to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, from Christian 

Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled 

‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of 

2013–2014 Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review: Uncovered Innerspring Units from the 

People’s Republic of China’’ (‘‘Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum’’), dated concurrently with these 

results and hereby adopted by this notice. 

6See sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act. 

7On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance changed the name of its centralized 

electronic service system to ACCESS. The Web site 

location was changed from http://iaaccess.trade.gov 

to http://access.trade.gov. The Department 

published in the Federal Register the final rule 

changing the references to ‘‘IA ACCESS’’ in the 

Department’s regulations to ‘‘ACCESS.’’ See 

Enforcement and Compliance; Change of Electronic 

Filing System Name, 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 

2014). 

8See Uncovered Innerspring Units from the 

People’s Republic of China: No Sales Certifications 

Clarifications, dated December 2, 2014. 

9See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011) and the 

‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section below. 

10See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 

11See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

12See 19 CFR 351.303. 

13See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

14See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

15For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 

(October 24, 2011). 

composed of a series of individual metal 

springs joined together in sizes 

corresponding to the sizes of adult 

mattresses (e.g., twin, twin long, full, 

full long, queen, California king and 

king) and units used in smaller 

constructions, such as crib and youth 

mattresses. The product is currently 

classified under subheading 

9404.29.9010 and has also been 

classified under subheadings 

9404.10.0000, 7326.20.0070, 

7320.20.5010, or 7320.90.5010 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). The HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes 

only; the written product description of 

the scope of the order is dispositive.5

Methodology 

The Department has conducted this 

review in accordance with section 

751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’). With respect to 

Creative Furniture, we relied on facts 

available and, because Creative 

Furniture did not act to the best of its 

ability to respond to the Department’s 

requests for information, we drew an 

adverse inference in selecting from 

among the facts otherwise available.6

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, please see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’).7

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov and in the 

Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the 

main Department of Commerce 

building. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

on the Internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum and 

the electronic versions of the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum are 

identical in content. 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

Comfort Coil timely submitted a 

certification indicating that it had no 

exports, sales, or entries of subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POR.8 To corroborate Comfort Coil’s 

no shipments claim, the Department 

submitted a formal query to U.S. 

Customs & Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’), 

the results of which did not provide any 

evidence that contradicts Comfort Coil’s 

claim of no shipments. Moreover, no 

party commented on Comfort Coil’s no 

shipments claim or the results of the 

CBP query. Based on the certification of 

Comfort Coil and our analysis of the 

CBP information, the Department 

preliminarily determines that Comfort 

Coil did not have any reviewable 

transactions during the POR. In 

addition, consistent with the 

Department’s practice in nonmarket 

economy (‘‘NME’’) cases, the 

Department finds that it is appropriate 

not to rescind the review, in part, in 

these circumstances, but rather to 

complete the review with respect to 

Comfort Coil and issue appropriate 

instructions to CBP based on the final 

results of the review.9

Preliminary Results of Review 

The Department preliminarily 

determines that a dumping margin of 

234.51 percent exists for Creative 

Furniture for the period February 1, 

2013, through January 31, 2014. 

Public Comment 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), 

interested parties may submit case briefs 

not later than 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. Rebuttal briefs, limited to 

issues raised in the case briefs, may be 

filed not later than five days after the 

date for filing case briefs.10 Parties who 

submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in 

this proceeding are encouraged to 

submit with each argument: (1) A 

statement of the issue; (2) a brief 

summary of the argument; and (3) a 

table of authorities.11 Case and rebuttal 

briefs should be filed using ACCESS.12

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing, or to participate if one is 

requested, must submit a written 

request to the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, filed 

electronically via ACCESS. An 

electronically filed document must be 

received successfully in its entirety by 

5 p.m. Eastern Standard Time within 30 

days after the date of publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register.13

Requests should contain: (1) The party’s 

name, address, and telephone number; 

(2) the number of participants; and (3) 

a list of issues to be discussed. Issues 

raised in the hearing will be limited to 

those raised in the respective case 

briefs. The Department will issue the 

final results of this administrative 

review, including the results of its 

analysis of the issues raised in any 

written briefs, not later than 120 days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) 

of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results, the 

Department will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review.14 The Department intends to 

issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 

days after the publication date of the 

final results of this review. We will 

instruct CBP to assess duties at the ad 

valorem margin rate published above. 

We will instruct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review if any 

assessment rate calculated in the final 

results of this review is above de 

minimis. Additionally, pursuant to its 

assessment practice in NME cases, if the 

Department continues to determine that 

Comfort Coil had no shipments of the 

subject merchandise, any suspended 

entries that entered under that 

exporter’s case number (i.e., at that 

exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the 

PRC-wide rate.15 The final results of this 

review shall be the basis for the 

assessment of antidumping duties on 

entries of merchandise covered by the 

final results of this review and for future 

deposits of estimated duties, where 

applicable. The Department will assess 

duties only on entries of Comfort Coil’s 


Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 35 / Monday, February 23, 2015 / Notices 9437 

and Creative Furniture’s PRC-origin 

merchandise. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for shipments of 

the subject merchandise from the PRC 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For Comfort 

Coil, which claimed no shipments, the 

Department has not established a cash 

deposit rate in this administrative 

review, for Creative Furniture, the cash 

deposit rate will be that established in 

the final results of this review (except, 

if the rate is zero or de minimis, then 

zero cash deposit will be required) and 

the Department will collect cash 

deposits only on Comfort Coil’s and 

Creative Furniture’s PRC-origin 

merchandise; (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed PRC and nonPRC exporters not listed above that 

received a separate rate in a prior 

segment of this proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

existing exporter-specific rate published 

for the most recently completed period; 

(3) for all PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise that have not been found 

to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate 

of 234.51 percent; and (4) for all nonPRC exporters of subject merchandise 

which have not received their own rate, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the PRC exporter that 

supplied that non-PRC exporter. These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213. 

Dated: February 13, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

1. Summary 

2. Background 

3. Scope of the Order 

4. Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

5. Facts Otherwise Available 

6. Adverse Facts Available 

7. Corroboration 

8. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2015–03613 Filed 2–20–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

The Department of Commerce will 

submit to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) for clearance the 

following proposal for collection of 

information under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

chapter 35). 

Agency: National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 

Title: Shipboard Observation Form for 

Floating Marine Debris. 

OMB Control Number: 0648–0644. 

Form Number(s): None. 

Type of Request: Regular (extension of 

a currently approved information 

collection). 

Number of Respondents: 20. 

Average Hours Per Response: 30 

minutes. 

Burden Hours: 10. 

Needs and Uses: This request is for 

extension of a currently approved 

information collection. 

This data collection project will be 

coordinated by the NOAA Marine 

Debris Program, and involve 

recreational and commercial vessels 

(respondents), shipboard observers 

(respondents), NGOs (respondents) as 

well as numerous experts on marine 

debris observations at sea. The 

Shipboard Observation Form for 

Floating Marine Debris was created 

based on methods used in studies of 

floating marine debris by established 

researchers, previous shipboard 

observational studies conducted at sea 

by NOAA, and the experience and input 

of recreational sailors. The goal of this 

form is to be able to calculate the 

density of marine debris within an area 

of a known size. Additionally, this form 

will help collect data on potential 

marine debris resulting from the March 

2011 Japan tsunami in order to better 

model movement of the debris as well 

as prepare (as needed) for continued 

debris arrival to areas around the 

Pacific. This form may additionally be 

used to collect data on floating marine 

debris in any water body. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households; not-for-profit institutions; 

business or other for-profit 

organizations. 

Frequency: On occasion. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. 

This information collection request 

may be viewed at reginfo.gov. Follow 

the instructions to view Department of 

Commerce collections currently under 

review by OMB. 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to OIRA_Submission@

omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806. 

Dated: February 17, 2015. 

Sarah Brabson, 

NOAA PRA Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2015–03536 Filed 2–20–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–JE–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

The Department of Commerce will 

submit to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) for clearance the 

following proposal for collection of 

information under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

chapter 35). 

Agency: National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 

Title: Coral Reef Conservation 

Program Administration. 

OMB Control Number: 0648–0448. 

Form Number(s): None. 

Type of Request: Regular (extension of 

a currently approved information 

collection). 

Number of Respondents: 35. 

Average Hours Per Response: 2. 

Burden Hours: 70. 

Needs and Uses: This request is for 

extension of a currently approved 

information collection. 

The Coral Reef Conservation Act of 

2000 (Act) was enacted to provide a 

framework for conserving coral reefs. 

The Coral Reef Conservation Grant 

Program, under the Act, provides funds 


Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES