Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Parts 61 and 63
[EPA-R06-OAR-2008-0063; FRL-9923-22-Region 6]
 AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
 ACTION: Direct final rule; delegation of authority.
 SUMMARY: The Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) has submitted updated regulations for receiving delegation of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) authority for implementation and enforcement of National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) for all sources (both part 70 and non-part 70 sources). The delegation of authority under this action does not apply to sources located in Indian Country. EPA is taking direct final action to approve the delegation of certain NESHAPs to ODEQ.
 DATES: This rule is effective on April 27, 2015 without further notice, unless EPA receives relevant adverse comment by March 26, 2015. If EPA receives such comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         informing the public that the updated NESHAPs delegation will not take effect.
 ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R06-OAR-2008-0063, by one of the following methods: *www.regulations.gov.*
                         Follow the on-line instructions.
                    Email: Mr. Rick Barrett at*barrett.richard@epa.gov.*
                         Please also send a copy by email to the person listed in the 
                        **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**
                         section below.
                    Mail or delivery: Mr. Rick Barrett, Air Permits Section (6PD-R), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. *Instructions:*
                         Direct your comments to Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-2008-0063. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at 
                        *http://www.regulations.gov,*
                         including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information through 
                        *http://www.regulations.gov*
                         or email, if you believe that it is CBI or otherwise protected from disclosure. The 
                        *http://www.regulations.gov*
                         Web site is an “anonymous access” system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without going through 
                        *http://www.regulations.gov,*
                         your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment along with any disk or CD-ROM submitted. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters and any form of encryption and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at 
                        *http://www.epa.gov/​epahome/​dockets.htm.* *Docket:*
                         The index to the docket for this action is available electronically at 
                        *www.regulations.gov*
                         and in hard copy 
                        ( print page 9623)
                        at EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (
                        *e.g.,*
                         copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available at either location (
                        *e.g.,*
                         CBI).
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Rick Barrett (6PD-R), (214) 665-7227, 
                        *barrett.richard@epa.gov.*
                         To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment with Mr. Barrett or Mr. Bill Deese at (214) 665-7253.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document “we,” “us,” and “our” refers to EPA. Table of Contents I. What does this action do? II. What is the authority for delegation? III. What criteria must Oklahoma's programs meet to be approved? IV. How did ODEQ meet the approval criteria? V. What is being delegated? VI. What is not being delegated? VII. How will applicability determinations be made? VIII. What authority does EPA have? IX. What information must ODEQ provide to EPA? X. What is EPA's oversight role? XI. Should sources submit notices to EPA or ODEQ? XII. How will unchanged authorities be delegated to ODEQ in the future? XIII. Final Action XIV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. What does this action do? EPA is taking direct final action to approve the delegation of certain NESHAPs to ODEQ. With this delegation, ODEQ has the primary responsibility to implement and enforce the delegated standards. II. What is the authority for delegation? Section 112(l) of the CAA, and 40 CFR part 63, subpart E, authorize EPA to delegate authority to any State or local agency which submits adequate regulatory procedures for implementation and enforcement of emission standards for hazardous air pollutants. The hazardous air pollutant standards are codified at 40 CFR parts 61 and 63. III. What criteria must Oklahoma's program meet to be approved? Section 112(l)(5) of the CAA enables EPA to approve state air toxics programs or rules to operate in place of the Federal air toxics program or rules. 40 CFR part 63, subpart E governs EPA's approval of State rules or programs under section 112(l). EPA will approve an air toxics program if we find that: (1) The State program is “no less stringent” than the corresponding Federal program or rule; (2) The State has adequate authority and resources to implement the program; (3) The schedule for implementation and compliance is sufficiently expeditious; and (4) The program otherwise complies with Federal guidance. In order to obtain approval of its program to implement and enforce Federal section 112 rules as promulgated without changes (straight delegation), a state must demonstrate that it meets the approval criteria of 40 CFR 63.91(d). 40 CFR 63.91(d)(3) provides that interim or final Title V program approval will satisfy the criteria of 40 CFR 63.91(d) for part 70 sources (sources required to obtain operating permits pursuant to Title V of the Clean Air Act). IV. How did ODEQ meet the NESHAPs program approval criteria? As to the NESHAPs standards in 40 CFR parts 61 and 63, as part of its Title V submission ODEQ stated that it intended to use the mechanism of incorporation by reference to adopt unchanged Federal section 112 into its regulations. This commitment applied to both existing and future standards as they applied to part 70 sources. EPA's final interim approval of Oklahoma's Title V operating permits program delegated the authority to implement certain NESHAPs on February 5, 1996 (61 FR 4220). On December 5, 2001, EPA granted final full approval of the State's operating permits program (66 FR 63170). These interim and final Title V program approvals satisfy the upfront approval criteria of 40 CFR 63.91(d). Under 40 CFR 63.91(d)(2), once a State has satisfied up-front approval criteria, it needs only to reference the previous demonstration and reaffirm that it still meets the criteria for any subsequent submittals of the section 112 standards. ODEQ has affirmed that it still meets the up-front approval criteria. V. What is being delegated? By letter dated January 11, 2008, ODEQ requested EPA to update its existing NESHAP delegation. With certain exceptions noted in section VI below, Oklahoma's request included NESHAPs in 40 CFR part 61 and 40 CFR part 63. ODEQ's request included newly incorporated NESHAPs promulgated by EPA and amendments to existing standards currently delegated, as amended between September 2, 2004 and September 1, 2006. These NESHAPs were adopted by the ODEQ on March 27, 2007, and became effective on June 15, 2007. VI. What is not being delegated? The following part 61 and 63 authorities listed below are not delegated. All of the inquiries and requests concerning implementation and enforcement of the excluded standards in the State of Oklahoma should be directed to the EPA Region 6 Office. 40 CFR part 61, subpart B (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from Underground Uranium Mines);
                40 CFR part 61, subpart H (National Emission Standards for Emissions of Radionuclides Other Than Radon From Department of Energy Facilities);
                40 CFR part 61, subpart I (National Emission Standards for Radionuclide Emissions from Federal Facilities Other Than Nuclear Regulatory Commission Licensees and Not Covered by Subpart H);
                40 CFR part 61, subpart K (National Emission Standards for Radionuclide Emissions from Elemental Phosphorus Plants);
                40 CFR part 61, subpart Q (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from Department of Energy facilities);
                40 CFR part 61, subpart R (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from Phosphogypsum Stacks);
                40 CFR part 61, subpart T (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from the Disposal of Uranium Mill Tailings); and
                40 CFR part 61, subpart W (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from Operating Mill Tailings). In addition, EPA cannot delegate to a State any of the Category II Subpart A authorities set forth in 40 CFR 63.91(g) (2). These include the following provisions: § 63.6(g), Approval of Alternative Non-Opacity Standards; § 63.6(h)(9), Approval of Alternative Opacity Standards; § 63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Test Methods; § 63.8(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Monitoring; and § 63.10(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Recordkeeping and Reporting. In addition, some Part 63 standards have certain provisions that cannot be delegated to the States. Therefore, any Part 63 standard that provides that certain authorities cannot be delegated are retained by EPA and not delegated to ODEQ. Furthermore, no authorities are delegated that require rulemaking in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     to implement, or where Federal overview 
                    ( print page 9624)
                    is the only way to ensure national consistency in the application of the standards or requirements of CAA section 112. Finally, section 112(r), the accidental release program authority, is not being delegated by this approval. In addition, this delegation to ODEQ to implement and enforce certain NESHAPs does not extend to sources or activities located in Indian country, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. Under this definition, EPA treats as reservations, trust lands validly set aside for the use of a Tribe even if the trust lands have not been formally designated as a reservation. Consistent with previous federal program approvals or delegations, EPA will continue to implement the NESHAPs in Indian country because ODEQ has not submitted information to demonstrate authority over sources and activities located within the exterior boundaries of Indian reservations and other areas in Indian country.[1] VII. How will applicability determinations under section 112 be made? In approving this delegation, ODEQ will obtain concurrence from EPA on any matter involving the interpretation of section 112 of the CAA or 40 CFR parts 61 and 63 to the extent that implementation, administration, or enforcement of these sections have not been covered by EPA determinations or guidance. VIII. What authority does EPA have? We retain the right, as provided by CAA section 112(l)(7), to enforce any applicable emission standard or requirement under section 112. EPA also has the authority to make certain decisions under the General Provisions (subpart A) of part 63. We are granting ODEQ some of these authorities, and retaining others, as explained in sections V and VI above. In addition, EPA may review and disapprove of State determinations and subsequently require corrections. (
                    *See*40 CFR 63.91(g) and 65 FR 55810, 55823, September 14, 2000, as amended at 70 FR 59887, October 13, 2005; 72 FR 27443, May 16, 2007.) Furthermore, we retain any authority in an individual emission standard that may not be delegated according to provisions of the standard. Also, listed in the footnotes of the part 63 delegation table at the end of this rule are the authorities that cannot be delegated to any State or local agency which we therefore retain. IX. What information must ODEQ provide to EPA? ODEQ must provide any additional compliance related information to EPA, Region 6, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance within 45 days of a request under 40 CFR 63.96(a). In receiving delegation for specific General Provisions authorities, ODEQ must submit to EPA Region 6 on a semi-annual basis, copies of determinations issued under these authorities. For parts 61 and 63 standards, these determinations include: Section 63.1, Applicability Determinations; Section 63.6(e), Operation and Maintenance Requirements—Responsibility for Determining Compliance; Section 63.6(f), Compliance with Non-Opacity Standards—Responsibility for Determining Compliance; Section 63.6(h), Compliance with Opacity and Visible Emissions Standards—Responsibility for Determining Compliance; Sections 63.7(c)(2)(i) and (d), Approval of Site-Specific Test Plans; Section 63.7(e)(2)(i), Approval of Minor Alternatives to Test Methods; Section 63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), Approval of Intermediate Alternatives to Test Methods; Section 63.7(e)(iii), Approval of Shorter Sampling Times and Volumes When Necessitated by Process Variables or Other Factors; Sections 63.7(e)(2)(iv), (h)(2), and (h)(3), Waiver of Performance Testing; Sections 63.8(c)(1) and (e)(1), Approval of Site-Specific Performance Evaluation (Monitoring) Test Plans; Section 63.8(f), Approval of Minor Alternatives to Monitoring; Section 63.8(f), Approval of Intermediate Alternatives to Monitoring; Section 63.9 and 63.10, Approval of Adjustments to Time Periods for Submitting Reports; Section 63.10(f), Approval of Minor Alternatives to Recordkeeping and Reporting; Section 63.7(a)(4), Extension of Performance Test Deadline. X. What is EPA's oversight role? EPA must oversee ODEQ's decisions to ensure the delegated authorities are being adequately implemented and enforced. We will integrate oversight of the delegated authorities into the existing mechanisms and resources for oversight currently in place. If, during oversight, we determine that ODEQ made decisions that decreased the stringency of the delegated standards, then ODEQ shall be required to take corrective actions and the source(s) affected by the decisions will be notified, as required by 40 CFR 63.91(g)(1)(ii). We will initiate withdrawal of the program or rule if the corrective actions taken are insufficient. XI. Should sources submit notices to EPA or ODEQ? All of the information required pursuant to the general provisions and the relevant subpart of the Federal NESHAPs (40 CFR parts 61 and 63) should be submitted by sources located outside of Indian country, directly to the ODEQ at the following address: Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality, 707 North Robinson, P.O. Box 1677, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73101-1677. The ODEQ is the primary point of contact with respect to delegated NESHAPs. Sources do not need to send a copy to EPA. EPA Region 6 waives the requirement that notifications and reports for delegated standards be submitted to EPA in addition to ODEQ in accordance with 40 CFR 63.9(a)(4)(ii) and 63.10(a)(4)(ii). For those standards that are not delegated, sources must continue to submit all appropriate information to EPA. XII. How will unchanged authorities be delegated to ODEQ in the future? In the future, ODEQ will only need to send a letter of request for approval to EPA, Region 6, for NESHAP regulations that ODEQ has adopted by reference. The letter must reference the previous up-front approval demonstration and reaffirm that it still meets the up-front approval criteria. We will respond in writing to the request stating that the request for delegation is either granted or denied. A 
                    **Federal Register**
                     action will be published to inform the public and affected sources of the delegation, indicate where source notifications and reports should be sent, and to amend the relevant portions of the Code of Federal Regulations showing which NESHAPs standards have been delegated to ODEQ. XIII. Final Action The public was provided the opportunity to comment on the proposed approval of the program and mechanism for delegation of section 112 standards, as they apply to part 70 
                    ( print page 9625)
                    sources, on March 10, 1995, for the proposed interim approval of ODEQ's operating permits program. (60 FR 13088). In EPA's final full approval of ODEQ's operating permits program on February 5, 1996 (61 FR 4220), EPA discussed that no adverse comments were received from the public on the proposed final delegation of the operating permits program. In today's action, the public is given the opportunity to comment on the approval of ODEQ's request for delegation of authority to implement and enforce certain section 112 standards for all sources (both part 70 and non-part 70 sources) which have been adopted by reference into Oklahoma's state regulations. However, the Agency views the approval of this request as a noncontroversial action and anticipates no adverse comments. Therefore, EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal. However, in the “Proposed Rules” section of today's 
                    **Federal Register**
                     publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the program and delegation of authority described in this action if adverse comments are received. This action will be effective April 27, 2015 without further notice unless the Agency receives relevant adverse comments by March 26, 2015. If EPA receives relevant adverse comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     informing the public the rule will not take effect. We will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. Please note that if we receive relevant adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of the rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of a relevant adverse comment. XIV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a “significant regulatory action” and therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, “Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use” (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 
                    *et seq.*). Because this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the delegation is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State, and the EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state request to receive delegation of certain Federal standards, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 “Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks” (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant. In reviewing delegation submissions, EPA's role is to approve submissions provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a delegation submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA to use VCS in place of a delegation submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 
                    *et seq.*). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 
                    *et seq.,*
                     as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . This action is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by 
                    *April 27, 2015*. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects 40 CFR Part 61 Environmental protection
Administrative practice and procedure
Air pollution control
Arsenic
Benzene
Beryllium
Hazardous substances
Mercury
Intergovernmental relations
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
Vinyl chloride 40 CFR Part 63 Environmental protection
Administrative practice and procedure
Air pollution control
Hazardous substances
Intergovernmental relations
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
 Dated: February 6, 2015. Wren Stenger, Director, Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division, Region 6.
 For the reasons stated in the preamble, 40 CFR parts 61 and 63 are amended as follows: PART 61—NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
 1.The authority citation for part 61 continues to read as follows: Authority:
                        42 U.S.C. 7401 
                            *et seq.* Subpart A—General Provisions
 2.Section 61.04 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(6)(iv) to read as follows: § 61.04
  
 (c) * * * (6) * * * (iv) 
                            *Oklahoma.*
                             The Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODED) has been delegated the following part 61 standards promulgated by EPA, as amended in the 
                            **Federal Register**
                             through September 1, 2006. The (X) symbol is used to indicate each subpart that has been delegated. Delegation Status for National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (Part 61 Standards) for Oklahoma
[Excluding Indian country]
Subpart
Source category
ODEQ 1A
General Provisions
XB
Radon Emissions From Underground Uranium MinesC
Beryllium
XD
Beryllium Rocket Motor Firing
XE
Mercury
XF
Vinyl Chloride
XG
(Reserved)H
Emissions of Radionuclides Other Than Radon From Department of Energy FacilitiesI
Radionuclide Emissions From Federal Facilities Other Than Nuclear Regulatory Commission Licensees and Not Covered by Subpart HJ
Equipment Leaks (Fugitive Emission Sources) of Benzene
XK
Radionuclide Emissions From Elemental Phosphorus PlantsL
Benzene Emissions From Coke By-Product Recovery Plants
XM
Asbestos
XN
Inorganic Arsenic Emissions From Glass Manufacturing Plants
XO
Inorganic Arsenic Emissions From Primary Copper Smelters
XP
Inorganic Arsenic Emissions From Arsenic Trioxide and Metallic Arsenic Production Facilities
XQ
Radon Emissions From Department of Energy FacilitiesR
Radon Emissions From Phosphogypsum StacksS
(Reserved)T
Radon Emissions From the Disposal of Uranium Mill TailingsU
(Reserved)V
Equipment Leaks (Fugitives Emission Sources)
XW
Radon Emissions From Operating Mill TailingsX
(Reserved)Y
Benzene Emissions From Benzene Storage Vessels
XZ-AA
(Reserved)BB
Benzene Emissions From Benzene Transfer Operations
XCC-EE
(Reserved)FF
Benzene Waste Operations
X1
                                 Program delegated to Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ).
 PART 63—NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES
 3.The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows: Authority:
                        42 U.S.C. 7401 
                            *et seq.* Subpart E—Approval of State Programs and Delegation of Federal Authorities
 4.Section 63.99 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(37)(i) to read as follows: § 63.99
  (a)  * * * (37)  * * * (i) The following table lists the specific part 63 standards that have been delegated unchanged to the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality for all sources. The “X” symbol is used to indicate each subpart that has been delegated. The delegations are subject to all of the conditions and limitations set forth in Federal law, regulations, policy, guidance, and determinations. Some authorities cannot be delegated and are retained by EPA. These include certain General Provisions authorities and specific parts of some standards. Any amendments made to these rules after September 1, 2006 are not delegated. Delegation Status for Part 63 Standards—State of Oklahoma
[Excluding Indian country]
Subpart
Source category
ODEQ 1 2A
General Provisions
XF
Hazardous Organic NESHAP (HON)—Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI)
XG
HON—SOCMI Process Vents, Storage Vessels, Transfer Operations and Wastewater
XH
HON—Equipment Leaks
XI
HON—Certain Processes Negotiated Equipment Leak Regulation
XJ
Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production
(3
                                    )( print page 9627)K
(Reserved)L
Coke Oven Batteries
XM
Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning
XN
Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks
XO
Ethylene Oxide Sterilizers
XP
(Reserved)Q
Industrial Process Cooling Towers
XR
Gasoline Distribution
XS
Pulp and Paper Industry
XT
Halogenated Solvent Cleaning
XU
Group I Polymers and Resins
XV
(Reserved)W
Epoxy Resins Production and Non-Nylon Polyamides Production
XX
Secondary Lead Smelting
XY
Marine Tank Vessel Loading
XZ
(Reserved)AA
Phosphoric Acid Manufacturing Plants
XBB
Phosphate Fertilizers Production Plants
XCC
Petroleum Refineries
XDD
Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations
XEE
Magnetic Tape Manufacturing
XFF
(Reserved)GG
Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities
XHH
Oil and Natural Gas Production Facilities
XII
Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Facilities
XJJ
Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations
XKK
Printing and Publishing Industry
XLL
Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants
XMM
Chemical Recovery Combustion Sources at Kraft, Soda, Sulfide, and Stand-Alone Semichemical Pulp Mills
XNN
(Reserved)OO
Tanks—Level 1
XPP
Containers
XQQ
Surface Impoundments
XRR
Individual Drain Systems
XSS
Closed Vent Systems, Control Devices, Recovery Devices and Routing to a Fuel Gas System or a Process
XTT
Equipment Leaks—Control Level 1
XUU
Equipment Leaks—Control Level 2 Standards
XVV
Oil—Water Separators and Organic—Water Separators
XWW
Storage Vessels (Tanks)—Control Level 2
XXX
Ethylene Manufacturing Process Units Heat Exchange Systems and Waste Operations
XYY
Generic Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards
XZZ-BBB
(Reserved)CCC
Steel Pickling—HCI Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration
XDDD
Mineral Wool Production
XEEE
Hazardous Waste Combustors
XFFF
(Reserved)GGG
Pharmaceuticals Production
XHHH
Natural Gas Transmission and Storage Facilities
XIII
Flexible Polyurethane Foam Production
XJJJ
Group IV Polymers and Resins
XKKK
(Reserved)LLL
Portland Cement Manufacturing
XMMM
Pesticide Active Ingredient Production
XNNN
Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing
XOOO
Amino/Phenolic Resins
XPPP
Polyether Polyols Production
XQQQ
Primary Copper Smelting
XRRR
Secondary Aluminum Production
XSSS
(Reserved)TTT
Primary Lead Smelting
XUUU
Petroleum Refineries—Catalytic Cracking Units, Catalytic Reforming Units and Sulfur Recovery Plants
XVVV
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW)
XWWW
(Reserved)XXX
Ferroalloys Production: Ferromanganese and Silicomanganese
XAAAA
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills
XCCCC
Nutritional Yeast Manufacturing
XDDDD
Plywood and Composite Wood Products
XEEEE
Organic Liquids Distribution
XFFFF
Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Processes (MON)
XGGGG
Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Production
XHHHH
Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production
X( print page 9628)IIII
Auto & Light Duty Truck (Surface Coating)
XJJJJ
Paper and other Web (Surface Coating)
XKKKK
Metal Can (Surface Coating)
XMMMM
Misc. Metal Parts and Products (Surface Coating)
XNNNN
Surface Coating of Large Appliances
XOOOO
Fabric Printing Coating and Dyeing
XPPPP
Plastic Parts (Surface Coating)
XQQQQ
Surface Coating of Wood Building Products
XRRRR
Surface Coating of Metal Furniture
XSSSS
Surface Coating for Metal Coil
XTTTT
Leather Finishing Operations
XUUUU
Cellulose Production Manufacture
XVVVV
Boat Manufacturing
XWWWW
Reinforced Plastic Composites Production
XXXXX
Tire Manufacturing
XYYYY
Combustion Turbines
XZZZZ
Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines (RICE)
XAAAAA
Lime Manufacturing Plants
XBBBBB
Semiconductor Manufacturing
XCCCCC
Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching and Battery Stacks
XDDDDD
Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters Major Sources
XEEEEE
Iron Foundries
XFFFFF
Integrated Iron and Steel
XGGGGG
Site Remediation
XHHHHH
Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing
XIIIII
Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Plants
XJJJJJ
Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing
XKKKKK
Clay Ceramics Manufacturing
XLLLLL
Asphalt Roofing and Processing
XMMMMM
Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Operation
XNNNNN
Hydrochloric Acid Production, Fumed Silica Production
XOOOOO
(Reserved)PPPPP
Engine Test Facilities
XQQQQQ
Friction Products Manufacturing
XRRRRR
Taconite Iron Ore Processing
XSSSSS
Refractory Products Manufacture
XTTTTT
Primary Magnesium Refining
X1
                                 Program delegated to Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ).2
                                 Authorities which may not be delegated include: § 63.6(g), Approval of Alternative Non-Opacity Emission Standards; § 63.6(h)(9), Approval of Alternative Opacity Standards; § 63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Test Methods; § 63.8(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Monitoring; § 63.10(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Recordkeeping and Reporting; and all authorities identified in the subparts (
                                *e.g.,*
                                 under “Delegation of Authority”) that cannot be delegated.3
                                 The ODEQ has adopted this subpart unchanged and applied for delegation of the standard. The subpart was vacated and remanded to EPA by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. See, 
                                *Mossville Environmental Action Network*
                                 v. 
                                *EPA,*
                                 370 F. 3d 1232 (D.C. Cir. 2004). Because of the D.C. Court's holding, this subpart is not delegated to ODEQ at this time.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act of 2005 includes a provision relating to Oklahoma and EPA programs, providing: Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (referred to in this section as the “Administrator”) determines that a regulatory program submitted by the State of Oklahoma for approval by the Administrator under a law administered by the Administrator meets applicable requirements of the law, and the Administrator approves the State to administer the State program under the law with respect to areas in the State that are not Indian country, on request of the State, the Administrator shall approve the State to administer the State program in the areas of the State that are in Indian country, without any further demonstration of authority by the State. H.R. 3, Section 10211(a). Oklahoma has not applied to administer the NESHAPS program in Indian country in accordance with this statute. Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2015-03803 Filed 2-23-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P