alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004078EN.01058301.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/583 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/583

---

(2004/C 78 E/0617)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3549/03

by José Ribeiro e Castro (UEN) to the Commission

(28 November 2003)

Subject:   Cohesion Fund — Portugal

Subject:

The Commission has stated that the suspension of the Cohesion Fund in relation to Portugal ceased at the beginning of this year. However, to date this normalisation of the Cohesion Fund has had few or no effects. The Portuguese Government is making an immense effort to consolidate the budget so as to comply with the Stability and Growth Pact. For geographical reasons, and particularly in view of the current enlargement, Portugal is suffering a severe economic backlash from its peripheral location. Action in the transport infrastructure sector is therefore of particular importance.

On the other hand, there is fortunately — since the Gothenburg 1999 and Lisbon 2000 Summits — the reassuring consideration that the goals of economic and material development in the European Union should only be pursued in obedience to sustainability criteria, i.e. the so-called environmental dimension. For example, an ‘eco-conditionality’ criterion was introduced for the carrying out of various activities which fell within the scope of EU powers.

In other words, transport infrastructure and the environment are two areas of prime importance for the longed-for Portuguese convergence and the much desired social cohesion of the EU and, for that very reason, come under the Cohesion Fund.

The Commission:

| 1. | Can it tell me where exactly we are right now with the application of the Cohesion Fund in Portugal, both in procedural and quantitative terms? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can it tell me where exactly we are right now with the application of the Cohesion Fund in Portugal, both in procedural and quantitative terms?

| 2. | Are public reports that Portugal is in danger of losing these funds justified? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Are public reports that Portugal is in danger of losing these funds justified?

| 3. | How many cases have been approved, to date, relative to the Commission's expectations? |
| --- | --- |

3.

How many cases have been approved, to date, relative to the Commission's expectations?

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(9 January 2004)

(9 January 2004)

The indicative Cohesion Fund allocation to Portugal for 2003 is EUR 478 million. To this must be added EUR 169 million not committed by Portugal in 2002. Thus for 2003 an indicative amount of EUR 647 million was available for part-financing of transport and environment projects.

Of this amount the Commission committed EUR 645 million in December 2003, EUR 139 million for 12 projects accepted in previous years and EUR 506 million for 23 new projects.

We consider therefore that Portugal's take-up of Cohesion Fund commitment appropriations is satisfactory given that the leeway from 2002 has been made up.

---
USCIB: 29 ./2 

21 September 1954 

OONPIBEN'f:E.U. 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIBEC: 

Subject: Procedure for Handling Matters Involving Base Rights for 

Intercept Activities in Foreign Countries. 

1. To achieve better coordination, under USCIB policy control, 

of matters involving base rights for intercept activities in foreign 

countries the procedure set forth belo~ is suggested. 

24 

2. A Standing Committee of USCIBEC for Intercept Base Rights should 

be established and composed of one representative each from the Department 

of Defense, Department of State, and the National Security Agency, the 

chair to be provided by the Department of Defense member. 

3. From their inception, throughout subsequent negotiations and 

before entering into any agreement with a foreign country for base rights 

for COMINT intercept activities all matters pertaining to such negotiations should be ref erred to the above-mentioned Standing Connnittee 

which will be expected to study the matter and report expeditiously their 

views and reconnnendations to the USCIB Executive Committee for further 

consideration and recommendations as appropriate. 

4. In order to provide a central channel for referring such matters 

to the above mentioned Standing Committee all members will be expected 

to notify the office of the Executive Secretary, USCIB without delay 

whenever a matter involving negotiations for intercept base rights comes 

to their attention. The Executive Secretary will be expected to refer 

the matter to the Standing Committee inunediately and to take such other 

action as he may deem appropriate in the way of notifying the members of 

USCIB or USCIBEC. 

5. It is requested that members indicate their views with regard to 

the above by executing the attached vote sheet and returning it to this 

office by the close of business Thursday, 30 September 1954. 

USCIB: 29./2 

ursuant to E. 0. 1352
REF ID:A606. 

TO~" S:BORB'f' 

24 

USCIB: 29.16/9 

2 November 1954 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

'f0P Bl!l6ftft PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

MEMORANDUM FCE. THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: I • 

Subject: Terms of Reference for u. s. -1 .... ___ .... r COMINT 

Negotiations. 

Reference: USCIB 29.16/7 dated 18 October 1954. 

1. All members have approved the enclosure with the reference. 

2. According~ the enclosure with the reference becomes pa.rt of 

subject terms and should be incorporated therewith by attachment as 

TAB G to the enclosure with USCIB 29.16/4 dated 3. September 1954. 

3. THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS COMMUNICATIONS INTELLICENCE INFC!U.!ATION 

AND SHALL BE HANDLED ONLY IN CHANNELS ~RESSLY PROVIPED FOR CCW:NT. 

USCIB: 29.16/9 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 08-11-2014 pursuant to E .0. 1352a 

TOPSBGRET
Exhibit 21.1

                       KINDER MORGAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.


Kinder Morgan Canada Company - Nova Scotia
Kinder Morgan North Texas Pipeline, L.P. - DE
Kinder Morgan Texas Gas Services LLC - DE
Kinder Morgan Transmix Company, LLC - DE
Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC - CO
Kinder Morgan Trailblazer, LLC - DE
CGT Trailblazer, LLC - DE
Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, L.P. - DE
MidTex Gas Storage Company, LLP - TX
Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "A" - DE
Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "B" - DE
Kinder Morgan CO2 Company, L.P. - TX
Trailblazer Pipeline Company - IL
Kinder Morgan Bulk Terminals, Inc. - LA
Western Plant Services, Inc. - CA
Dakota Bulk Terminal, Inc. - WI
Delta Terminal Services LLC - DE
River Consulting, Inc. - LA
HBM Environmental, Inc. - LA
Milwaukee Bulk Terminals, Inc. - WI
Queen City Terminals, Inc. - DE
Kinder Morgan Port Terminals USA LLC - DE
Elizabeth River Terminals LLC - DE
Nassau Terminals LLC - DE
Fernandina Marine Construction Management LLC - DE
Kinder Morgan Port Manatee Terminal LLC - DE
Kinder Morgan Port Sutton Terminal LLC- DE
Pinney Dock & Transport LLC - OH
River Engineered Systems, Inc. - LA
Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "C" - DE
Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "D" - DE
SFPP, L.P. - DE
Kinder Morgan Liquids Terminals LLC - DE
Kinder Morgan Pipeline LLC - DE
Kinder Morgan Tank Storage Terminals LLC - DE
Kinder Morgan 2-Mile LLC - DE
Rahway River Land LLC - DE
Central Florida Pipeline LLC - DE
Southwest Florida Pipeline LLC - DE
Calnev Pipe Line LLC - DE

<PAGE>

Kinder Morgan Las Vegas LLC - DE
Colton Processing Facility - CA
Kinder Morgan Materials Services, LLC - PA
CIG Trailblazer Gas Company, L.L.C. - DE
KM Trailblazer, LLC - DE
Kinder Morgan Border Pipeline, L.P. - DE
Tejas Gas, LLC - DE
Gulf Energy Gas, LLC - DE
Gulf Energy Gathering & Processing, LLC - DE
Gulf Energy Marketing, LLC - DE
Hydrocarbon Development, LLC - DE
Kinder Morgan Tejas Pipeline, L.P. - DE
Stellman Transportation, LLC - DE
Kinder Morgan Tejas Pipeline GP LLC - DE
Tejas Energy Partner, LLC - DE
Tejas Gas Systems, LLC - DE
Tejas-Gulf, LLC - DE
Tejas Natural Gas, LLC - DE
Kinder Morgan Pipeline Services of Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V. - Mexico
Valley Gas Transmission, LLC - DE
KMTP LLC - DE
Silver Canyon Pipeline LLC - DE
Kinder Morgan Liquids Terminals St. Gabriel LLC - LA
Kinder Morgan Gas Natural de Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V. - Mexico
KM Production Company GP LLC - DE
Kinder Morgan Production Company LP - DE
Emory B Crane, LLC - LA
Frank L. Crane, LLC - LA
Paddy Ryan Crane, LLC - LA
Agnes B Crane, LLC - LA
KMBT LLC - DE
KM Production Company LP LLC - DE
KM Crane LLC - MD
MJR Operating LLC - MD
Kinder Morgan West Texas Pipeline, L.P. - DE
Kinder Morgan Southeast Terminals LLC - DE
Dorsey Unit, LLC - MD
International Marine Terminals - LA
ICPT, L.L.C. - LA
Kinder Morgan Carbon Dioxide Transportation Company - DE
Kinder Morgan Crude Oil Pipelines, L.P. - DE
KM CO2 Pipelines LP LLC - DE
KM Crude Oil Pipelines GP LLC - DE
Pecos Carbon Dioxide Transportation Company - TX
# CE2004084EN.01075201.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/752 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/752

---

(2004/C 84 E/0847)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0030/04

by Christopher Huhne (ELDR) to the Commission

(20 January 2004)

Subject:   Landfill and gravel extraction sites

Subject:

Can the Commission state whether any EU legislation exists that stipulates the distance of landfill and gravel extraction sites from houses, roads and water courses?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(23 February 2004)

(23 February 2004)

As regards landfills, Annex I.1 of Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste (1) states that the location of a landfill must take into consideration requirements relating to:

1

| (a) | the distances from the boundary of the site to residential and recreational areas, waterways, water bodies and other agricultural or urban sites; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the distances from the boundary of the site to residential and recreational areas, waterways, water bodies and other agricultural or urban sites;

| (b) | the existence of groundwater, coastal water or nature protection zones in the area; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the existence of groundwater, coastal water or nature protection zones in the area;

| (c) | the geological and hydrogeological conditions in the area; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the geological and hydrogeological conditions in the area;

| (d) | the risk of flooding, subsidence, landslides or avalanches on the site; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

the risk of flooding, subsidence, landslides or avalanches on the site;

| (e) | the protection of the nature or cultural patrimony in the area. |
| --- | --- |

(e)

the protection of the nature or cultural patrimony in the area.

The landfill can be authorised only if the characteristics of the site with respect to the above-mentioned requirements, or the corrective measures to be taken, indicate that the landfill does not pose a serious environmental risk. However, the Directive does not stipulate any specific distances from houses, roads or water courses.

As regards gravel extraction, such an activity is governed by Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 25 June 1985, on the assessment of the effects of certain projects on the environment (2) as amended by Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997 (3). Location is one of the criteria to be taken into account in assessing the potential significant effects of extractive activities. Similarly, the Directive does not stipulate any specific distances but relevant requirements may be found in national provisions implementing the Directive.

2

3

---

(1)  OJ L 182, 16.7.1999.

1

(2)  OJ L 175, 5.7.1985.

2

(3)  OJ L 73, 14.3.1997.

3

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-17721, 333-72339, 333-72953,333-58456, 333-91212 and 333-118307) of Closure Medical Corporation of our report dated March 16, 2005 relating to the financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Raleigh, North Carolina 

March 16, 2005
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

RAYMOND E. STAUFFER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BROOKS BROTHERS, INC. AND RETAIL BRAND 

ALLIANCE, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees,

AND

UNITED STATES,

Intervenor-Appellee.

______________________ 

2013-1180

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of New York in No. 08-CV-10369, Judge 

Sidney H. Stein.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

Raymond E. Stauffer moves the court to accept the 

joint appendix for filing. 

Case: 13-1180 Document: 72 Page: 1 Filed: 01/15/2014
2 STAUFFER v. BROOKS BROTHERS, INC. 

Upon consideration thereof,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is granted. The joint appendix is accepted 

for filing.

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Daniel E. O’Toole 

Clerk of Court

s26

Case: 13-1180 Document: 72 Page: 2 Filed: 01/15/2014
#### W. W. McCANLESS v. H. W. REYNOLDS.

*Appeal.*

Appeals will be dismissed if the bond on appeal is not given within the time required by law.

Civil Action tried at Spring Term, 1878, of DavidsoN Superior Court, before *Buxton, J.*

*649There was a verdict and judgment in favor of defendant, and the plaintiff appealed. Motion by defendant to dismiss the appeal.

*Messrs. Clement, Finnix, Smith*and *Fuller & Snoio,*for plaintiff.

*Messrs. J. M. Mo Cor Me*and *Watson & Glenn,*for defendant.

Ashe, J.

There was a motion in this court to dismiss the appeal upon the ground the plaintiff had not complied with the requirements of the law in perfecting his appeal. The judgment from which the appeal was taken was rendered at spring term, 1878, and no bon'd was given to secure the costs on appeal until the 6th day of January, 1879, and we find nothing in the record to indicate that there had been any waiver by the defendant. In all such cases it is the uniform rule of this court to dismiss the appeal. *Wade*v. *Newbern,*72 N. C., 408 ; *Sever*v. *McLaughlin,*82 N. C., 332; *Wadsworth*v. *Carroll, Ib.,*333; *Royster*v. *Burwell, ante,*24.

The appeal is dismissed with costs against the appellant.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,807
<ALLOWANCES>                                       163
<INVENTORY>                                      9,486
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,119
<PP&E>                                          17,075
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,115
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,581
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,614
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          4
<COMMON>                                           424
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,807
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,581
<SALES>                                         35,353
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,388
<CGS>                                           29,549
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,758
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,370)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (548)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (822)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      74
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (748)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
       
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
  As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
reports (and to all references to our Firm) included or made a part of this
registration statement.
                                             
                                              
                                          -------------------------------
                                          Arthur Andersen LLP
 
Boston, Massachusetts
   
December 10, 1998
REF ID:A57586 

e 

USCIB: 5.3/4? 

20 July 1954 

~M)R.ANDYM FOR THE ?:EgRS OF WCIBEC: 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Approval of the Minutes of the Sixteenth Meeting of 

USCIBEC. 

USCIB 5.3/43 dated 8 July 1954. 

la No objection to the reference having been received by 8 

July 1954, the Tentative Minutes of the Sixteenth Meeting of USCIBEC 

are considered approved. 

2. It is requested that the word TENTATIVE be deleted from 

the initial page of the minutes for each item considered a?Xi the word 

FINAL substituted therefor. 

ptain, • Navy 

cutive Secretary, USCIB 

USCIB: 5.3/47 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-17-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

24
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.10

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-4 of Building One Services Corporation, of our report dated
February 17, 1998, relating to the financial statements of Crest International,
LLC which appears in Building One Services Corporation's Prospectus Supplement
dated May 17, 1999. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
"Experts" in such Registration Statement.



                               /s/ Shinners, Hucovski & Company, S.C.
                               -----------------------------------------------


Green Bay, Wisconsin
June 23, 1999
... - <~ REF ID:A65644 

- - ' 

------t?.ee.c._.. ... e,.,h. ~~ud,..,,~ u,.h14 ,£ t:'-~e~~",,_J _____ _ ..J 7, ...J 

----#~SH--~~ 11-- '3 70 130~~ L.ueu.Joiec_.s___....·ec;.r...1 ..._., zt~' ------

?be kl.&t~.e a.£_ ·:zhtt ~_;~-ld.tt..~.-=-------"----

r.Ae~~ rej u.1r~~ L~ · ? . ~e ~L.~ 14-~ L_,.__·__.~ ..... w~,..._.L,~t'-.d.'--. -----·---

----C_..o..._I._. __.WO&..l,~.s_~ YJ.e4°~A8 ~i~Z ~~ ~ 'f---

-----4"-/h.....__e.£...!' r~_,f-' ..... ~P-f~al /~ 11d.d1t1atvtt a£ a.... __________ _ 

---·r.__t<Jl_~fulA -. of' .. _e ~/::__..____ _________ __ 

. ______ rkf- v;re: "&o./Kr&a._,,. J~f''·rr~l (~,-$£_;~------

____ . -1-L~L__. J,~. ~di_ ~ c:J:fr~.:r..--~-=---'t'J:::;_:._,,. _____ _ 

-----~~--~~~te_l6LJ----~.-·~~--------~---~--~ 

__ . · fo_.s_~,-h/11 daf:es ··k-~e~ic-<~: _ 

, ~ - / .s: . ~~&?.. :i 1 - ";2.:2_/)e_-c_. AIL'. a Pk t:t S"a-.. 

1--~--"'"'w....__1 ._._/f-""t:.4'd<JM-~t= ~4"l AJl&t"444.H ... 70 .be Su r:e Lo 

____ __,.;o .... ~6>-& ~~"' va ... d ca IA a ~...,d. 

. ~-· Fn~alA d'b~w 'r -0-ddn .. ~. 

--------~- _c.d._!L~ 14-. ~-'- ~M-~W-.. ~.A..~h.L~J'_-~ S ./9 S d 8 __ 

·--U ~e.~-~-~r.,,te,+ ________ _ roved for Release b NS on 08-26-2013 ursuantto E .0. 1352 
• ·:JI'" REF ID:A65644· ····~ 

------~ . -

f> re".e. '4 'f .pwdu..t.e..~~-'(!:L.r-J&.!T~ ~ frL164-_ _,.~_u:.r;_ ___ _ 

Nr. Cle:a~k 1~ ~~~ IM4:;,t YfL-C-"1----~----• 

___ w__h()J() eo ..... ~ .... ..,,."' .. 4N-1"f'tf4fuw3 d'l+44~ fj.c r /)___Lill~------~· 

_______ .J_,_f£e~ ~~Mc,_. b 8 r tr t ~~,..,_--&:......,1._,h._.1.....,e....__ _______ _ 

------C~~-w~~, ·c~-u~e-,f1~.~~-·-~~---~-----~--· 

?, i(epo.-t ow. M. I I ~s: T 

_______ __.f...._,f'i,_.,._(),~tLL•t1 (!If . ~h..t;_u- ('_54.& S hrA9~., 

-----+&_.f(J.....,...'1'......,.Att~--JL)_~r:__;fd~ .fl, . ~ h«L o7Zt~-L-),_,_: __ ~-• 

--~--£:~r,__w~o.......,~ &~-5- _a:/_ llJ~_fr. ~J-A- ..,.,.<=.....=~-....c-J.._, ______ _ 

t;I ~'° . Q,,Jd_~~~or4' ,£ ~c=a#l!cS.-. ______ _ f 

----~~~,..~~r (~o~,tov-i.'e!J\ 

----- ------ --------------~----· 

----~------· ------·-

----------------·~
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I,
Michael J. McCann, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Petroleum Helicopters, Inc.

By: /s/ Michael J. McCann
    --------------------------------
Michael J. McCann
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
May 7, 2004
NRC) APPROVED FOR 

RELASE 1 JULY 2015 

31 JAN 1967 

n!"'"!.:;1"7: .

DIRECTOR OF DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING 

WASHINGTON. D. C. 20301 

II 

MEMORANDUM FOR TI ASSISTANT SDORETARY OF TEE AIR FORCE (R&D) 

SUBJECT: Extended Lifetime Support Module tor MOL 

I have reviewed your memorandum on this sub4ect dated 20 January 1967. 

I concur in your approach to design the baseline MOL system so theta growth to a 60 day life can be achieved when desired but to qualifI,, 

• the present system only for 30 days. 

The MOL program which will total over 4141 billion as now planned 

presents severe funding problem. It is certainly prudent that we 

take steps such as you propose which could lead to a snore effective 

use of the MOL system in the fixture. I do request, however, that 

special steps be taken in the configuration and change control area 

to assure that in providing for a future extended life capability 

the funding required for changes to the baseline program not be, 

increased beyond the $2 riallon'ou identify as necessary. 

John 84. Fosteri Jr. 

ritirstatiolos 

HANDLE VIA BYENIAN 

CONTROL` SYSTEM ONLY 

Itili) SEEra BYE 5054-67