alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONCFO



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Plains Resources Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen A. Thorington, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



To the best of my knowledge, after reasonable investigation:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                              
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|                    | 
|Dated: May 6, 2004. |  | /s/    Stephen A. Thorington                 
|                    |  |                                              
|                    |  | Stephen A. Thorington Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          36,022
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  157,407
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,149
<INVENTORY>                                    107,241
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               304,752
<PP&E>                                         425,675
<DEPRECIATION>                                 188,261
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 762,440
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          298,681
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,989 
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,920
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   762,440
<SALES>                                        699,307
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               699,307
<CGS>                                          364,467
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  364,467
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               335,506
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,474
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,544
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,320)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,864
<DISCONTINUED>                                   5,847
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,017
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
        


</TABLE>
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

• 

26 November 1954 

'i'Qf 6!!i6RB'i1 

MEmRANDUM FOR: Executive Secretary, tBCIB 

SUBJECT : USCIB 13.4/6 - Codeword Stamps 

1. The Central Intelligence Agency in principle does not 

concur in the proposal contained in the subject paper. 

2. It is not believed that security would be enhanced by 

requiring that codeword stamps be manu:t:actured independently of 

stamps bearing appropriate classifications. 

3. In addition, the provision that "unused (including reserve} 

headed paper and rubber stamps bearing the Sigint codeword are to 

be treated as SECRET unless their purpose or meaning could be in:f'erred 

f"rom their environment ••• " is inconsistent with the substance or 

the contemplated tBCIB directive on handling intormation about COMINT 

now under consideration by the Security Committee. 

FOR THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE: 

for HUNTINGTON D. SHELDON 

CIB MEMBER, CIA 

OGA 

I 

I 

r 

r 

f 

t 

I 

i 

I 

r 

r -- ---

FORM A7031 SEP 97 

NSN- 7540-FM.00'-SSQR 

TOP SECRE'f 

l 

i 

eclassified and approved for release by 

SA on 09-03-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352 

-
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release # 07-19

Contact: (703) 808-5050 November 14, 2019

NRO Achieves Eleven Years of “Clean” Financial Audits

The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) received its eleventh consecutive 

unmodified (clean) audit of its annual financial statements, an accomplishment unequaled

in the U.S. Intelligence Community.

“I am extremely proud of the NRO’s robust financial and management controls. The men 

and women who manage our federal resources are truly experts in their field,” said NRO 

Director Dr. Christopher Scolese.

The audit was conducted by Kearney & Company, an independent public accounting 

firm. Kearney evaluated the reliability of financial data supporting NRO financial 

statements, the accuracy of the statements, and the accuracy of footnote disclosures in 

accordance with guidance issued by the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board, 

the Office of Management and Budget, and other authorities.

An unmodified or “clean” audit opinion means that the financial statements present fairly 

the financial position and the results of the organization’s operations in accordance with 

U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. NRO managers can confidently use this 

information in day-to-day decisions, knowing it is accurate and reliable. 

“Each year my team’s hard work and diligence exceeds their accomplishments from the 

previous year. I cannot begin to express how extremely proud I am of all of them. Their 

dedication, extensive knowledge, and experience assure our oversight officials and the 

American public that they can expect nothing short of excellence from us,” said Misty 

Tullar, NRO’s Chief Financial Officer and Director of NRO’s Business and Plans 

Operations Directorate.

 

 

-NROThe NRO is the Intelligence Community organization responsible for developing, 

launching, and operating America’s intelligence satellites to meet the national security 

needs of our nation.
**Exhibit 12.2**

 

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 

 

I, Roland Sackers, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of QIAGEN N.V; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting,or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

 

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this reportany change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

 

5. The company’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 18, 2005 

 

/s/ Roland Sackers

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on Rules of Criminal Procedure.

# ACTION:

Revised Notice of Open Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The March 16-17, 2015 meeting of the Advisory Committee on Rules of Criminal Procedure previously scheduled at the Florida A&M University College of Law, will now be held at the United States Courthouse, 401 West Central Boulevard, Orlando, Florida 32801. The announcement for this meeting was previously published in 80FR 4592.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle NE., Suite 7-240, Washington, DC 20544, Telephone (202) 502-1820.

Dated: February 19, 2015.

Julie Wilson,

Attorney Advisor, Rules Committee Support Office.

[FR Doc. 2015-03724 Filed 2-23-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 1 - 0 530 SNPRM **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 1 - CE - 0 12 - AD Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### NO COMMENTS RECEIVED

– If this box is checked, no s ignatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the fol lowing changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because

### Page 2 of 3

**For additional issues, double -**  **click here** 

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.:
**ASE Date** 

**Branch Manager Date**
# CE2004078EN.01054504.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/545 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/545

---

(2004/C 78 E/0576)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3428/03

by Mario Borghezio (NI) to the Commission

(18 November 2003)

Subject:   Eurostat scandal — unanswered questions

Subject:

On 8 July OLAF forwarded its file to the judiciary in Luxembourg. Did President Prodi or his staff contact Commissioner Solbes or his office to discuss the measures required?

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 21

                           MICROTOUCH SYSTEMS, INC.
                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



Name                                             Jurisdiction

MicroTouch Systems, Ltd.                  United Kingdom of Britain
MicroTouch Systems, Pty., Ltd.            Australia
MicroTouch Systems, Ltd.                  Hong Kong
MicroTouch Systems, Inc.                  Taiwan
MicroTouch Systems, KK                    Japan
MicroTouch Systems, SARL                  France
MicroTouch Systems, GMBH                  Germany
MicroTouch Systems, SRL                   Italy
MicroTouch Systems, SL                    Spain
MicroTouch Resistive Products, Inc.       Texas, U.S.A.
MicroTouch Investments, Inc.              Massachusetts, U.S.A.
MicroTouch FSC                            Saipan
Exhibit 32.1



ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned officer of ZOLL Medical Corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies that, to my knowledge, the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended October 3, 2004 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be a part of the Report or
filed for any purpose whatsoever.



|                        |  |  |  |       |  |                                                         
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Date: December 20, 2004 |  |  |  | Name: |  | /s/ Richard A. Packer                                   
|                        |  |  |  |       |  | Richard A. Packer, Chief Executive Officer and President
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.29
 RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT
(NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR VERSION)
 THIS RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 NOW, THEREFORE,
 1. Grant of Restricted Stock Award .
 2. Restrictions on Transfer of Shares Subject to Award .
  Percentage of AwardPeriod After Grant Date
    
    As to Which Restrictions LapseOne Year Anniversary
    
    
    331/3
    %Two Year Anniversary
    
    
    662/3
    %Three Year Anniversary
    
    
    100
    %




---



##### 



3. Restrictive Covenants .
  Non-Disclosure of Confidential Information
 Non-Solicitation of Employees and Customers
   Non-disparagement
 Non-Competition
   Subsequent assistance




---



##### 



Reformation
 Disclosure of Information
 Cancellation and Other Remedies
     4. Non-Assignability of Award .
 5. Adjustments .
 6. Rights as Shareholder .
 7 Withholding .




---



##### 



8. Notices .
 9. Governing Law .
 10. Provisions of Plan Controlling .
 11. Return of Signed Agreement .
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 GRANTEE
    
    
    
    CITIZENS BANKING CORPORATIONBy:William R. HartmanIts:
    
    Chairman, President and ChiefExecutive Officer
#### Kurz, Respondent, vs. Kurz and another, Appellants.

*December 12, 1903*

January *12, 1904.*

*•Equity: Quieting title: Evidence: Setting aside sheriff’s sale on execution.*

Upon sufficient evidence showing that the plaintiff was unahle to read or write the English language; that the land in question was bought with plaintiff’s money exclusively; that, though the title was in her husband’s name for a considerable time, plaintiff did not know of or consent to such holding; and that as soon as she learned of the fact the title wás transferred to her, a judgment removing an apparent cloud upon her title, caused by a judgment obtained against her husband when the record title was in his name, and setting aside a sheriff’s certificate of sale upon such judgment, is plainly right.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Wood ■county: Chas. M. Webb, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

The cause was submitted for the appellants on the briefs of *Gary & Forward,*and for the respondent on that of *John Bottensek.*

WiNslow, J.

There are no legal principles to be settled in this case; hence any detailed statement of facts is unnecessary. The action was brought by a married woman to remove an apparent cloud upon her title to real estate, caused by a judgment obtained against her husband when the record title was in his name, and to set aside a sheriffs certificate ■of sale upon such judgment. The court granted the relief sought upon sufficient evidence showing that the plaintiff *223was unable to read or write the- English language; that tbe land in question was bought with hei money exclusively; that, though the title was in her husband’s name for a considerable time, the plaintiff did not know of or consent to such holding; and that as soon as she learned of the fact the title was transferred to her. Upon these facts the judgment was plainly right.

*By the Oourt.*— Judgment affirmed.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release #02-10

Contact: (703) 808-5050 November 22, 2010

NRO SATELLITE SUCCESSFULLY LAUNCHED ABOARD DELTA IV HEAVY

A National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) payload was successfully launched aboard a 

United Launch Alliance Delta IV Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) from 

Space Launch Complex 37, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS), Florida, at 

5:58 p.m., EST, on November 21, 2010.

This is the second in a series of six launches that will take place during the 50th

anniversary of the NRO. This mission is the fourth EELV Delta IV Heavy Launch 

Vehicle mission to launch from CCAFS; the 14th Delta IV mission, and the second NRO 

mission to launch from United Launch Alliance’s Space Launch Complex 37.

This evening’s launch was dedicated to the memory of Jim Arnold, the former Director 

of Advanced Systems & Technology, who died in June 2010. Painted on the main 

booster of the Delta IV Heavy lift rocket was, “In memory of Jim Arnold. With vision, 

innovation, and dedication anything is possible.”

The NRO is a joint Department of Defense-Intelligence Community organization 

responsible for developing, launching, and operating America’s signals, imagery, and 

communications satellites to meet the needs of our nation. 

-NRO-
EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

DOD DIRECTIVE 5200.10 DOES NOT APPLY 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

DORIAN 

CONTROL NO 

COPY 

PAGE OF 

OF COPIES 

PAGES 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

"i'S.1- NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

THE NRO STAFF 

2 7 DEC 1968 

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. F X 

SUBJECT: Nixon Staff Task Force on Space 

As a possible enlightenment concerning the purpose or mission 

of the Nixon Staff Task Force on Space, the following statement was 

offered by the Committee's secretary (Mr. George A. Derbyshire) 

during his security briefing: 

As you know, the purpose of the Committee is to 

determine whether we need any more information 

on man's ability to perform in space... This is important when looking to a 700 day mission... Is it 

necessary to continue to conduct more experiments 

in this area, or will we have enough data from military 

and other sources? We want to avoid a duplication of 

effort and be sure all sources of available data are used 

before initiating new programs. 

The distinct impression I had was that the Committee is primarily 

concerned with NASA not duplicating a DOD effort, if that effort provides all necessary data. 

Mr. Derbyshire also stated he does not anticipate the use of 

DORIAN data in the Committee's report, and assured me he will contact 

our office if DORIAN or space reconnaissance data is used in any way. 

Captain, USAF 

Asst for Security