alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

PROGRAM CHRONOLOGY 

PROGRAM TOTAL COST SCHEDULE 

(1) 28 June 65 $1653M 

1 unmanned 

6 manned 

First flight late CY 68 

Last flight early CY 70 

First manned flight 

late CY 68 

Unmanned flight CY 68 

First manned late CY 68 

First qual flight Apr 69. 

First manned flight Dec 69. 

Compatibility model camera 

First qual flight Apr 69 

First manned flight 

Dec 69 

First qual flight Apr 69 

First manned flight 

Dec 69 

First qual flight Apr 70 

First manned flight 

Dec 70 

First qual flight Jan 71 

First manned Flight Oct 71 

First qual flight Dec 70 

First manned flight Aug 71 

P4f0 I— of pages 

Co ")17 4. of _lin copies.0__ 

11%.1'SI GontrolZiielisarT■ 

24 August 65 

1 unmanned 

5 manned 

25 August 65 

Presidential Announcement 

1 unmanned 

5 manned 

23 May 66 

2 qualification 

3 manned 

2 unmanned 

September 66 

2 qualification 

3 manned 

2 unmanned 

December 66 

2 qualification 

3 manned 

2 unmanned 

$1500M 

$1500M 

$1750M 

$1749M 

$1970M 

 June 67 

2 qualification 

co 3 manned No \ 2 unmanned 

tr. Oct/Nov 67 co Nom 2 qualification 

==== 3 manned 

)-== 2 unmanned 

December 67 

2 qualification 

3 manned 

2 unmanned 

$2350M 

$293914 

$280714 
GEtrzi &Atom 

Page _-- of ___ pages 

Copy ___ of ___ copi s 

SAFSL .Control 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

. . 

-ZL.To 

V. 61!771N 

1181"111 PliStnf] 

p. ;4 

- 1\laccla 

MOL PROGRAM CHRONOLOGY5 

• DATE FLIGHT PROGRAM 

June 65 1 qual launch 

6 manned fits 

Aug 65 1 qual launch 

5 manned fits 

May 66 2 qual launches 

3 manned fits 

2 unmanned fits 

FLIGHT SCHEDULE COST1 

Fall 1968 $1.65B 

1st flt late 19682 

Fall 1968 $1.50B 

1st flt late 19682 

16i: launch Apr 1269 $1.75B 

1st flt Dec 1969J 

1st flt Sep 1970 

Dec 66 

Jun 67 

Dec 67 

2 qual launches 

3 manned fits 

2 unmanned fits 

2 qual launches 

3 manned fits 

2 unmanned fits 

2 qual launches 

3 manned fits 

2 unmanned fits 

1st launch Apr 1969 $1.97B 

1st flt Dec 19693 

1st flt Sep 1970 

1st launch Apr 1270 $2.35B 

1st fit Dec 1970 

1st fit Sep 1971 

1st launch Dec 1270 $2.80B 

1st flt Aug 1971 

1st flt Sep 1972 

Footnotes: 

1. Total cost from start engineering development. 

2. 1st manned flt without payload; 1st camera flt in 1969. 

3. 1st manned flt with qual-model camera/optics. 

4. 1st manned flt with production camera/optics. 

5. The MOL Program has evolved from a manned system demonstration of a very 

high resolution photo capability to operational manned and unmanned systems. 

The increases in costs are attributable to that scope change, a camera 

development cost several times higheethan initially estimated, a program 

spanning a much longer time period, and detailed program definition and contract 

negotiations.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

We, the undersigned officers and directors of Viisage Technology, Inc., hereby
jointly and severally constitute and appoint Thomas J. Colatosti and Charles J.
Johnson, and each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys with full power
to them, and each of them singly, to sign for us and in our names in the
capacities indicated below, the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed
herewith and any and all amendments to said Registration Statement and generally
to do all such things in our names and on our behalf in our capacities as
officers and directors to enable Viisage Technology, Inc. to comply with the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and all requirements of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all signatures as they may
be signed by our said attorneys, or any of them, to said Registration Statement
and all amendments thereto.

Signature                          Title
---------                          -----

By: /s/ Denis K. Berube            Chairman of the Board of Directors
    -------------------
Denis K. Berube


By: /s/ Thomas J. Colatosti        President and Chief Executive Officer
    -----------------------
Thomas J. Colatosti                (Principal Executive Officer and Principal
                                   Financial and Accounting Officer)


By: /s/ Charles J. Johnson         Secretary and Director
    ----------------------
Charles J. Johnson


By: /s/ Harriet Mouchly-Weiss      Director
    -------------------------
Harriet Mouchly-Weiss


By: /s/ Peter Nessen               Director
    ------------------
Peter Nessen


By: /s/ Thomas J. Reilly           Director
    --------------------
Thomas J. Reilly


By: /s/ Charles E. Levine          Director
    ---------------------
Charles E. Levine
USCIB: .3 • .3/3 

!OP Sl!iSREP 

TOP SlmPl£~: AS 7~ 9 

-

9 May 1955 

MEMORANDt!'L FOR 'L'HE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Visit to London by Director 0£ Communica.tion Security, 

Canada. 

The following message, received from SUSLO, Ottawa, is forwarded for 

information: 

.._~~~~~~~~~o visit London first 

Purpose of visit general intelligence discussions discussions relative to egtablishing 

and to arrange communications channel ~o~r~s~am~e-. ---.i~n.....,....e ..... r..... s"l"""""a~ .. ""l""""':!l"'u=~er ~)l9.~ I may visit Washington for 

same purpose later/this si,;umner." 

~L 86-36/50 USC 3605 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

USCIB: 3 . .3/3 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-25-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

TOP SECR:E'f 

24
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE    Contact: Lauren Belliveau
                         Communications & Investor
                         Relations Specialist
                         (508) 910-3673


                             Aerovox Incorporated
                        Extends Shareholder Rights Plan

NEW BEDFORD, MA (October 20, 1999) Aerovox Incorporated (Nasdaq.NM:ARVX)
announced today that its Board of Directors has approved a ten-year extension of
its existing shareholder rights plan. The Company also announced that the
threshold for triggering the shareholder rights plan has been raised to 20% and
a new rights agent has been appointed.

Robert Elliott, president and chief executive officer, commented, "The renewed
rights plan is designed to continue to protect stockholders from attempts to
acquire Aerovox on terms or by using tactics that could deny all stockholders
the opportunity to realize the full value of their investment. It also enhances
the ability of the Board of Directors to protect stockholder interests."

The Company has amended the plan to both permit the appointment of American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company as rights agent and to raise the threshold for
triggering the plan to 20%. If a person or group acquires beneficial ownership
of 20% or more of the then outstanding shares of the Company's Common Stock or
announces a tender or exchange offer that would result in such person or group
owning 20% or more of the then outstanding Common Stock, each right would
entitle its holder to purchase shares of the Company's Common Stock having a
market value of two times the exercise price of the right.

The Board of Directors may redeem the rights at the redemption price of $.01 per
right, subject to adjustment, at any time prior to December 1, 2009, the
expiration date of the rights.

Aerovox stated that the extension of the rights plan is not in response to any
outside effort to gain control of the Company, and that it is not aware of any
takeover attempt. The renewal of the rights plan will not affect the Company's
reported earnings per share.

The amendments to the shareholder rights plan will be filed as exhibits to the
Company's 8-K.

Aerovox Incorporated is a leading manufacturer of film, paper and aluminum
electrolytic capacitors. The Company sells its products worldwide, principally
to original equipment manufacturers as components in electrical and electronic
equipment. Aerovox has operations in New Bedford, MA; Huntsville, AL; Juarez and
Mexico City, Mexico; and Weymouth, England.

                                 Page 5 of 11
# CE2004084EN.01052601.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/526 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/526

---

(2004/C 84 E/0601)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0015/04

by Christopher Huhne (ELDR) to the Commission

(16 January 2004)

Subject:   Apple orchards

Subject:

Can the Commission state whether any EU legislation has stipulated or resulted in the restriction of British apple growers from planting new orchards of English apples? In particular, Cox's apples.

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(23 February 2004)

(23 February 2004)

Recipients of Community aid for grubbing up apple, pear, peach and nectarine trees for the 1990/1991 to 1992/1993, 1994/1995, 1995/1996 and 1997/1998 marketing years had to undertake ‘to refrain for a period of 15 years, first, from planting any apple trees (other than cider-apple trees), pear trees (other than perry-pear trees), peach trees and/or nectarine trees on the areas of [their] holding affected by the grubbing up operation and, second, from extending the other areas of [their] holding planted with apple trees (other than cider-apple trees), pear trees (other than perry-pear trees), peach trees and/or nectarine trees’ (1). This requirement, not aimed at any particular variety of dessert apple, was necessary in order to give the grubbing up operations the full economic effect desired and avoid wasting Community funds.

1

---

(1)  See Article 3(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2467/97 of 11 December 1997 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/97 on the improvement of the Community production of apples, pears, peaches and nectarines, OJ L 341, 12.12.1997.

1

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BONAR ROMULUS PANGGABEAN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-70933

Agency No. A078-020-333

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 15, 2009 ** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Bonar Romulus Panggabean, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

FILED

JAN 07 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

(“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

substantial evidence. Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir. 2009); Li

v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 962 (9th Cir. 2004). We deny the petition for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that changed or extraordinary

circumstances excused the untimely filing of Panggabean’s asylum application. 

See 8 C.F.R. §§ 1208.4(a)(4), (5); Ramadan v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 646, 656–58

(9th Cir.2007) (per curiam). Therefore, we deny the petition with respect to

Panggabean’s asylum claim.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s finding that Panggabean was not

credible because he testified inconsistently regarding the attacks he allegedly

suffered due to his involvement in the Christian youth ministry in college, see

Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1043 (9th Cir. 2001) (finding that petitioner’s

“testimony about the events leading up to his departure” “‘went to heart of [his]

asylum claim’” and “‘related to the basis for his alleged fear of persecution’”), and

he failed to specify the injuries he suffered after such attacks, see Singh-Kaur v.

INS, 183 F.3d 1147, 1153 (9th Cir. 1999) (holding level of specificity proper

consideration in adverse credibility determination). Moreover, because

Panggabean’s testimony lacked credibility, his failure to present easily available

corroborating evidence was fatal to his application. See Sidhu v. INS, 220 F.3d
3

1085, 1090 (9th Cir. 2000) (“[I]f the trier of fact either does not believe the

applicant or does not know what to believe, the applicant’s failure to corroborate

his testimony can be fatal to his asylum application.”). Therefore, we deny the

petition with respect to his withholding of removal claim.

Finally, because Panggabean’s CAT claim was based on the same statements

the agency found not credible and he does not point to any evidence to show it is

more likely than not that he would be tortured if returned to Indonesia, we deny the

petition with respect to his CAT claim. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153,

1157 (9th Cir. 2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
\ ~ • 

USCIB: lA/272 

bbL~ 

c./s ~­

~I~ Q-..JJ24 

APPENDED DOCUMENTS Cot\= 

TAilI CODEWORD l·:ATERIAL 

9 Pebl"U&17 1953 

'l9P SiCR=@•ft B!f§filtA..m! 

MDfORANJJDl PQR 'l'HB MpBllS QF USC:[i: 

Subject: 

References: 

Release to the~ 'o 3. 3 (h) (2) 

Obtained bT the fL 86-36/so use 36 L-~~~~~~~~~~---' 

(a) USCIB: 14/_269 dated 15 .Janual'7 1953 

(b) USDIBt 14/271 dated 4 Februar.y 195) 

lo The enclosures contain additional 1ntormat10n which the 

Director. NSA• has receiwd on the above eubjecto 

2o Thia intol'lllation is forwarded in cormection with the 

reterencea, wh1ah are scheduled tor consideration at the Eightyee second USCIB Meetingo 

if. • JONIS 

Acting Executiw Secretary, USCIB 

Enclosures = 2 

l. Message .tl"CIRDto SU>, Washington, DTC 031716Z Feb 53 

2. Message lrOll1 to sw. Wa•hington, DTG 0211201! Feb 5J 

USCIS: '14/272 

I 

APPENDED DOCIDIJT.NTS CON= 

TAIN CODEWORD EATERJ..AL 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 01-21-2015 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

• 

TOP SECRET 
REF ID:A65061 3. 3 (h) (2) 

86-36/50 USC 360 
REF ID:A65061 

3. 3 (h) (2) 

86-36/50 USC 3605
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN SUCH
REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>       JUN-30-1996

<CASH>                           2,932,019 
<SECURITIES>                          0    
<RECEIVABLES>                    4,732,665 
<ALLOWANCES>                          0    
<INVENTORY>                           0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 7,664,684 
<PP&E>                         210,570,226 
<DEPRECIATION>                  85,153,609 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 142,352,594 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           38,890,124 
<BONDS>                        124,264,886 
<COMMON>                              0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0    
<PREFERRED>                           0    
<OTHER-SE>                     (26,415,241)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   142,352,594 
<SALES>                         16,720,469 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                16,823,813 
<CGS>                                 0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   12,915,509 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   370,919 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 8,500,000 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               7,983,358 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (12,945,973)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (11,953,341)
<DISCONTINUED>                     200,000 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0    
<CHANGES>                             0    
<NET-INCOME>                   (11,753,341)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (82.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (82.06)

        


</TABLE>
REF ID:A57584 

COHFIBENrtJS.C. e 

comrmmcn:tL - e. s. EHiS mu.¥ 

SUBJECT Nlt1BER 

USCIB: 5.3/49 

Subject: 

Item l ot the Agenda for the Seventeenth Meeting of 

USCIBEC, hel,d on 30 July 1954. 

Approval ot the Final Minutes or the Fifteenth anci 

Sixteenth Meetings. 

The CHAIRMAN asked it there were any objections to subject minutes. 

There were none. 

The CHAIRMAN drew attention to the decision on Item l of the 

Fifteenth Meeting and asked it the members felt it necessary for the 

minutes to show that it was understood. that ext:.ensive deletions from the 

document then being considered might give rise to a need for further 

consideration. 

It was the consensus that such a correotion is not necessary. 

The Chairman then declared subject minutes approved. 

USCIB: 5 .3/49 - 3 -

COHFIBE.~f1'A:L 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-26-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B
Exhibit24.2

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appointseach of Barry F. Schwartz, Robert K. Kretzman and Michael T. Sheehan orany of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-factand agent, with full power of substitution, for him and his name, placeand stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the REVLON,INC. (the ‘‘Corporation’’) Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December  31,  2005 (the‘‘Form 10-K’’) under the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limiting thegenerality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and onbehalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a directoror officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K andany instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or inconnection with the Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file thesame, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connectiontherewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities andExchange Commission and any applicable securities exchange orsecurities self-regulatory body, granting unto said attorneys-in-factand agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do andperform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be donein and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as hemight or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all thatsaid attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substituteor substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtuehereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed thesepresents this 1st day ofMarch, 2006.

|  | /s/ HOWARDGITTIS                                 HOWARDGITTIS |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2


                                                           CERTIFICATION

I, Bruce Nelson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB of netGuru, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [language omitted pursuant to SEC
Release 34-47986] for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release 34-47986];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Dated: June 29, 2006

/S/ BRUCE K. NELSON
-----------------------------
Bruce K. Nelson,
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1508 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to redesign $20 Federal reserve 

notes so as to include a likeness of Harriet Tubman, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2015 

Mrs. SHAHEEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to redesign $20 

Federal reserve notes so as to include a likeness of 

Harriet Tubman, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Harriet Tubman Trib5 ute Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIKENESS OF HARRIET TUBMAN REQUIRED TO BE 

7 INCLUDED ON THE FACE OF $20 FEDERAL RE8 SERVE NOTES. 

9 The eighth undesignated paragraph of section 16 of 

10 the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 418) is amended by 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1508 IS

1 adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘The Sec2 retary of the Treasury shall ensure that the face of all 

3 $20 Federal reserve notes printed after December 31, 

4 2017, shall bear the likeness of Harriet Tubman.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
USCIB: 13. 7/47 

17 June 1955 

Ml!MORANDUM FOR THE Ml!MBEBS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Categorization of COMINT. 

Reference: USCIB 13.7/44 dated 2 June 1955. 

No objection having been raised to the subject paper prior to 

1700, 14 June 1955, the ~CIBEC decision referred. to therein is considered approved by USCIB. 

•• D JONES 

Acting Exec · e Secretary, USCIB 

USCIB: 13.7/47 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-20-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

COf\l-FIDENTIAL