alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                         546,984
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,955,182
<ALLOWANCES>                                   140,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,474,689
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,617,711
<PP&E>                                       4,016,377
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,795,065
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,047,524
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,711,605
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       121,231
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,310,521
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,047,524
<SALES>                                     31,079,249
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,079,249
<CGS>                                       19,999,113
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,921,864
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                42,400
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              88,904
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,026,968
<INCOME-TAX>                                   800,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,226,968
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,226,968
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1596 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1596

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2082 Stringtown Road in Grove City, Ohio, as the ``Specialist Joseph 
                    W. Riley Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 17, 2015

Mr. Portman (for himself and Mr. Brown) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2082 Stringtown Road in Grove City, Ohio, as the ``Specialist Joseph 
                    W. Riley Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIALIST JOSEPH W. RILEY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2082 Stringtown Road in Grove City, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Specialist Joseph W. Riley Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Specialist 
Joseph W. Riley Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<CIK>                              0000888239
<NAME>                             GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PTSP P-8
                                    
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                   180,865
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            116,632
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         297,497
<PP&E>                                 8,685,918
<DEPRECIATION>                         7,307,979
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         1,675,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                             1,675,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           1,675,436
<SALES>                                  831,611
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         943,537
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          1,616,474
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (672,937)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (672,937)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                           (672,937)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (6.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        
 

</TABLE>
USGIB: 9.3/15 

2 Decanber 1954 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MllMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Report by the Director, NSA on the Extent to which 

U.S. COMINT Resources can be Applied Effectively to 

Fulfill the Requirements of the USCIB Master 

Requirements List. 

USCIB 9.3/8, dated 18 October 1954. 

24 

1. The reference, which contains recommendations by the Intelligence Committee on the above subject, was forwarded to USCIBEC for 

consideration by vote sheet. 

2. Vote sheet replies indicated approval by all members with the 

exception of': (1) the NSA member, who expressed a desire to have the 

paper considered at the next. meeting of USCIB, and (2) the CIA member, 

who recommended that USCIBEC "consider the question of periodic 

reports by DIRNSA and the material which such reports should contain 11 • 

3. In this connection, the OSD member has informed this office 

of' his intent to submit certain recommendations in the matter for 

consideration at the next USCIB meeting. 

4. Accordingly, the reference has been placed on the agenda for 

the llOth meeting for consideration in light of the OSD recommendations, which will be distributed to all members in advance of the 

meeting. 

USCIB: 9.3/15 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-04-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

TOP SECRET
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I,
Al A. Gonsoulin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Petroleum Helicopters, Inc.

By: /s/ Al A. Gonsoulin
    --------------------------------
Al A. Gonsoulin

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
August 9, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1393 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1393

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
include in each regulatory impact analysis for a proposed or final rule 
 an analysis that does not include any other proposed or unimplemented 
                                 rule.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 20, 2015

  Mr. Thune (for himself, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Cotton, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. 
 Flake, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Lee, and Mr. Roberts) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
include in each regulatory impact analysis for a proposed or final rule 
 an analysis that does not include any other proposed or unimplemented 
                                 rule.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Real EPA Impact Reviews Act'' or the 
``REPAIR Act''.

SEC. 2. REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS REQUIREMENT.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law (including regulations), 
including Executive Order 13563 (76 Fed. Reg. 3821 (January 21, 2011)), 
Executive Order 12866 (58 Fed. Reg. 51735 (October 4, 1993)), and the 
document of the Office of Management and Budget entitled ``OMB Circular 
A-4'', in promulgating any rule the cost of which is projected to be 
greater than $1,000,000, the Administrator of the Environmental 
Protection Agency shall include in each of the regulatory impact 
analyses for the proposed and final rule at least 1 analysis that does 
not include--
            (1) any other proposed rule; or
            (2) any other rule that, as of the date of the analysis--
                    (A) has been finalized by the Administrator; but
                    (B) has not been implemented.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1143 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1143

 To make the authority of States of Washington, Oregon, and California 
   to manage Dungeness crab fishery permanent and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 30, 2015

 Ms. Cantwell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make the authority of States of Washington, Oregon, and California 
   to manage Dungeness crab fishery permanent and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``West Coast Dungeness Crab Management 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DUNGENESS CRAB FISHERY MANAGEMENT.

    Section 203 of the Act entitled ``An Act to approve a governing 
international agreement between the United States and the Republic of 
Poland, and for other purposes'', approved November 13, 1998 (Public 
Law 105-384; 16 U.S.C. 1856 note) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (i); and
            (2) by redesignating subsection (j) as subsection (i).
                                 <all>
```
# CE2004088EN.01065401.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/654 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/654

---

(2004/C 88 E/0671)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3880/03

by Emmanouil Bakopoulos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(16 December 2003)

Subject:   Pet passports

Subject:

The Commission has set the date for the introduction of pet passports at July 2004. This passport will be valid as a health certificate for pets and enable the owner to take pets freely throughout the Union, with the exception of the United Kingdom, Ireland and Sweden. So far any person wishing to travel within the European Union has to obtain a valid rabies vaccination certificate which is recorded in the pet's health booklet in any case.

Will the Commission say how the transport of pets within the EU will be essentially changed by this measure?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(26 January 2004)

(26 January 2004)

Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 on the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of pet animals and amending Council Directive 92/65/EEC (1) is applicable as of 3 July 2003. The Commission Decision establishing a model passport, applying Article 17 (2) of this Regulation, therefore applies from the same date.

1

The conditions applying to movements of domestic carnivores are therefore laid down by Regulation (EC) No 998/2003. The general rule for movements between Member States other than Ireland, Sweden and the United Kingdom is a current valid vaccination against rabies.

The aim of the passport is to have a single standardised veterinary document at Union level to facilitate controls on cats, dogs and ferrets circulating within European territory. It is intended to replace the various existing documents in the Member States, which caused a range of linguistic difficulties and had various formats, which did not facilitate their use when moving through the Union.

It may be completed by veterinarians in accordance with the animal's movements. It is a European veterinary certificate which will accompany the animal throughout its life and on which all events relating to its health status can be entered.

Finally, the passport will also be of use for movements to Ireland, Sweden and the United Kingdom. The headings corresponding to the particular provisions applying to these three Member States for a period of five years will therefore need to be completed.

---

(1)  OJ L 146, 13.6.2003.

1

---
Exhibit 23.1

Accountants' Consent

Board
of Directors
Gold Banc Corporation, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-74594, 333-80751, 333-78871 and 333-34152) on
Form S-8 of Gold Banc Corporation, Inc. of our report dated February 8, 2002 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Gold Banc Corporation, Inc. as of
December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the three years then ended, which report
appears in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Gold Banc Corporation, Inc.

|/s/ KPMG |  |  |  | 
|-------- |  |  |  | 

March
23, 2002

Kansas
City, Missouri

91

---

QuickLinks
Submitted on record and brief June 15,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration July 14, 1993

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Gregory D. Connor, Claimant. LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORP., *Petitioner, v.*Gregory D. CONNOR, *Respondent.*

(WCB No. 91-08760; CA A75565)

855 P2d 666

Ronald W. Atwood, Teresa A. Statler and Williams, Zografos, Peck & Atwood, P.C., Portland, filed the brief for petitioner.

Robert K. Udziela, John S. Stone and Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O’Leary & Conboy, Portland, waived appearance for respondent.

Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. *SAIF v. Herron,*114 Or App 64, 836 P2d 131, *rev den*315 Or 271 (1992).
Exhibit 23.5

Consent of David Penna

I
consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of North American Palladium Ltd., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of references to my name and references to my involvement in the
preparation of Technical Report for Lac des Iles Mine, Ontario, Incorporating Prefeasibility Study for Life of Mine Plan (effective date of March 21, 2014) included in the 2013 Annual Information Form of North American Palladium
Ltd., dated March 31, 2014 (the AIF).

I also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-13766) and in the Registration Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-185656) of the references to my name and the above-mentioned information in the AIF.

Dated this 31st day of March, 2014.



|     |  |                           
|---- |  | --------------------------
|Per: |  | /s/ David N. Penna, P.Geo.
|     |  | David N. Penna, P.Geo.    
|     |  | Principal Geologist       
|     |  | Lac des Iles Mines Ltd.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,486
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  723,868
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,304
<INVENTORY>                                  2,730,971
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,880,613
<PP&E>                                       2,210,674
<DEPRECIATION>                                 891,211
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,492,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          669,121
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,586
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,300,153
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,492,121
<SALES>                                      1,177,746
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,177,746
<CGS>                                          411,281
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  411,281
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               649,728
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,584
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                110,764
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,153
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             88,611
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    88,611
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
# EWP Sponsor Resources

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  EWP Sponsor Resources 

Resources for EWP Program assistance.

### **The EWP Program Process**

NRCS partners with diverse sponsors to complete EWP Program projects. To begin the process, a potential local sponsor submits a *Request for Assistance* that includes information on the nature, location and scope of the problem for which assistance is requested. The letter, considered the application, must be signed by an official of the requesting entity. NRCS staff is available to assist with the letter preparation and offer additional information on EWP Program eligibility. The letter must be sent to your local NRCS office or to your NRCS State office.

#### ***Sponsors must submit a formal request for assistance within 60 days of the disaster occurrence, or 60 days from the date when access to the sites becomes available.***

NRCS conducts damage survey reports (DSR), or case-by-case investigations of the work requested or damages reported. EWP Program restoration work may include removing debris from stream channels, road culverts and bridges; reshaping and protecting eroded streambanks; repairing damaged drainage facilities, levees and associated structures; reseeding damaged areas; or purchasing floodplain easements.

### STEP-BY-STEP Watershed Programs Process - 

Click here to download the guide.

### **Sponsor Responsibilities**

              - obtaining land rights for repairs;
              - securing the necessary permits;
              - furnishing the local cost share (Sponsors must come up with 25 percent of the construction costs for recovery measures in the form of cash or in-kind services);
              - accomplishing the installation of work. (Work can be done through federal or local contracts); and
              - conducting operation and maintenance on completed projects.

###   EWP Sponsor Guides and Templates

This twenty-page document covers the Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP) program policy, requests for assistance and outlines the process for sponsors seeking EWP assistance.

EWP Sponsor Guide (366.38 KB)

EWP Sponsor Request for Assistance Template(23.79 KB)
# CE2004078EN.01032302.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/323 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/323

---

(2004/C 78 E/0335)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3802/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject:   Update on use of funding from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Siena

Subject:

In its answer to question E-0989/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Siena had submitted projects or secured funding under the Culture 2000 programme, the Commission stated, on 30 July 2003, that the municipality had not submitted any projects by 2002. Can the Commission say if this has been the case subsequently and up to the present?

1

---

(1)  OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 200.

1

---
Exhibit 21.1MRV COMMUNICATIONS, INC.Subsidiaries of MRV   Subsidiary Name (1) Jurisdiction of OrganizationAlcadon AB SwedenAmazing Stream Holdings Limited British Virgin IslandsCharlotte’s Networks, Inc. DelawareCreative Electronic Systems SA SwitzerlandEDSLan SpA ItalyFiberxon (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd. Hong Kong, SAR, PRCFiberxon (Macao Commercial Offshore) Ltd. Macao, SAR, PRCFiberxon Chengdu Technology Co., Ltd. PRCFiberxon Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.,High-Tech Park Branch PRCFiberxon Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., ShanghaiBranch PRCFiberxon Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., ShanghaiBranch PRCFiberxon, Inc. DelawareInterdata FranceFiberxon, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company DelawareMRV Communications – Boston Division, Inc. MassachusettsMRV Communications GmbH GermanyMRV International, Ltd. IsraelMRV Switzerland AG SwitzerlandSource Photonics, Inc. DelawareTecnonet SpA Italy  *(1)* *In accordance with Instructions (ii) to Exhibit (21) to the Exhibit Table inItem 601 of Regulation S-K, Registrant has omitted from the above table three domesticand 21 foreign subsidiaries.*
REF ID:A57562 

• • 

USCIB: 5.3/63 

30 November 1954 

MEMORANDUM FOR '!HE MEMBERS OF USCIBEC: 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Approval of the Minutes of the Twentieth (Special) 

Meeting of USCIBEC. 

USCIB 5.3/57 dated 10 November 1954. 

l. No objection to the reference having been received by' 

26 November 1954, the Tentative Minutes of the Twentieth (Special) ~eeting are approved. 

~ 2. It is requested that the word TENTATIVE be deleted from 

the initial page'of the minutes for each item considered and the 

word FINAL substituted therefor. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-11-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

USCIB: 5.3/63