alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USCIB: 5.1/14 

24 

5 April 1955 

00HPimiN'f'IAJ. 

.MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB/USCIBEC: 

Subject: Membership Rosters. 

The attached rosters of the United States Communications 

Intelligence Board and its subordinate elements are forwarded 

:for information. 

Enclosure 

Membership Rosters USCIB and 

its Subordinate Elements, dtd 

1 April 1955. 

USCIB: 5.1/14 

USCIB 

eclassified and approved for 

elease by NSA on 09-26-2014 

ursuantto E .0. 13526 
.. : 

.... ' 

. 

.. 

REF ID:A68027 

. mffiERSHIP ROSTER 

UNITED STATES CCJOOJNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE BOARD 

1 APRIL 1955 

STATE 

Mr. W. Park Armstrong, Jr. 

DEFENSE 

General Graves B. Erskine, USllC 

(Retired) 

FBI 

Mr:- L. V. Boardman 

!M 

Mr. Allen W. Dulles, Chairman 

POSITION LOCATION 

Special Asst., Intelligence New State Bldg. 1158 

Assistant to the Secretary of Nat. Def. Bldg. 30 928 

Defense for Special Operations 

The Asst. to the Director Dept. of Justice 5736 

Lt. General Ralph J. Canine, USA Director, NSA NavSecSta 19-225 

ARMY 

Major General A. G. Trudeau 

NAVY 

Rear Admiral Carl F. Espe 

AIR FORCE 

Major General J. A. Samford 

CIA 

Mr:- Huntington D. Sheldon 

SECRE!'ARIAT 

Captain Rufus L. Taylor, USN 

Mr. H. D. Jones 

A.C. of S., G-2, U.S. A.rmy 

Director, Naval Intelligence 

Director of Intelligence 

Assistant Director, Current 

Intelligence 

Executive Secretary 

Deputy Executive Secretary 

Nat. Def. Bldg. 2E 4/J4 

Nat. Def. Bldg. 3E 528 

Nat. Def. Bldg. 4A 932 

"Q" Building 

11Q11 Building 

"Q" Building 

2054 

2054 

2054 

191 2132 

131 53333 

175 555 

131 60528 

131 530.33 

131 53239 

131 55613 

143 639 

143 3o65/3o66 

143 Jo65/3o66 
REF ID:A68027 

CONi!lllim!±lcb MEMBERSHIP ROSTER 

UNITED STATES CCUMUNICATIOOS INTEI.LIGENCE BOARD EX:ECUTIVE CCMMITTEE 

1 APRIL 1955 

Captain Rufus L. Taylor, USN, Chairman 

DIAL 

NAME -POSITICN LOCATION ROOM ~ EXT. 

STATE 

Mr. T. Achilles Polyzoides Director, Special Projects Staff State Annex # 2 1250 191 5405 

e DEFENSE 

Mr. William H. Godel Deputy Director, Office of Nat. Def. Bldg. 3D 92S 131 53334 

Special Operations 

FBI 

Mr. s. D. Ellis Liaison Officer Dept.. of Justice 7647 175 2021 

NSA 

Captain J. S. Holtwick, USN Deputy Chief of Staff, NavSecSta 19-240 131 6064S 

Operations 

ARMY 

Lt. Colonel Richard Leffers Plans and Policy Office Nat. Def. Bldg. 2E 4SS 131 74970 

NAVY 

e C'DRw. F. Bringle Head, Operational Intelligence Nat. Def. Bldg. 50 721+ 131 55020 

Section 

AIR FORCE 

Lt. Colonel F. J. Harrold, Jr. Chief, Supplemental Research Pent. Annex # 3 555 131 74675 

Branch 

OGA 

QlA I Chief, Special Intelligence "Q" Building 2141 143 8592 

staff, OOI 

-.... t .! 

,-' 
'' ''' ;''l'i'1 , II 0111) ·' 't.\• f{'("Hl·J· •·~1· tl l1;>;;\li '• r , ., ,... . 1 ,.t.,\~' •11'.;f!J~ J,.:' , ff 

"'-;,' . . 
• II 

-~ . 

• 

.. 

L'.iL•!'1,d I ai ''1 ~·~· w,·,.,,I
USCIB: '3/63 

5 June 1953 

!el' Sl9RIR 819UR£f!' DPemfAftetf 

Ml!HOIWlDUM FOR THB MF.MBERS <R USCIB: 

Subject: 

Rat erence: 

Allied (BA'l'O) Communications Secur1t7. 

USCIB 23/61 dated 3 June 1953• 

24 

The Director. GCHQ, hu 1ntoimd susw. Lendon, 

that a.a mensim ot the agenda ror the U.K.-u.s. Con-

.f'erm~e on Allied (NATO) Carsnmications Secur1t7 1s 

implicit in a consideration ot the problem and is 

thet"eto:re agreeable, based upan cited ref'erencea. 

USCIB: 23/63 

' 

a<~ ~ RUFUS L. TAILOR 

Captain, u. s. Nav 

Executive Secretary, USCIB 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-09-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

TOP SEC--=--=-:R=E_T_._ ___ _
# CE2004084EN.01008203.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/82 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/82

---

(2004/C 84 E/0089)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3680/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(9 December 2003)

Subject:   Update on use of funding from the Ecos-Ouverture II programme by the municipality of Florence

Subject:

In its answer to question E-1106/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Florence had submitted projects and secured funding under the Ecos-Ouverture programme, the Commission stated that the city had applied but had not been been selected for funding.

1

Can the Commission say why the projects were not considered suitable?

Has the Commission completed its examination of the final reports mentioned in its answers and, if so, can it supply any information on the outcome?

---

(1)  OJ C 11 E, 15.1.2004, p. 139.

1

---
# CE2004084EN.01073601.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/736 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/736

---

(2004/C 84 E/0829)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3470/03

by Catherine Stihler (PSE) to the Commission

(21 November 2003)

Subject:   Health risk reports relating to Tetrapol use

Subject:

Could the Commission inform us whether there have been reports in any European countries of health risks and illnesses as the result of the use of Tetrapol in relation to the use of handsets and/or from people working or living near the masts?

Joint answer

to Written Questions E-3464/03 and E-3470/03

given by Mr Liikanen on behalf of the Commission

(18 December 2003)

(18 December 2003)

GSM, TETRA, Tetrapol (and UMTS) technologies are used by networks providing mobile communications services.

Tetrapol is a technology, which competes in the market for private mobile communications services, for instance with the TETRA technology. Information on the roll-out of Tetrapol is published on the Tetrapol Forum website. Information on the networks in Europe is found under: (http://www.tetrapol.com/www/corp/references.php?id_zone=4&id_industrie=0&x= 10&y=13).

The Commission is not aware of any reports of health risks and illnesses relating to the use of Tetrapol handsets and/or from people working or living near the Tetrapol masts. The existing regulatory framework in the Union and in Member States, such as applied for GSM and TETRA masts and handsets, is technology neutral and also appropriate for the Tetrapol technology. It provides for a high protection of health for our citizens. The Honourable Member is further referred to the response of the Commission to the large number of questions on this matter, recently to written questions E-3076/03 by Mr Meijer (1), E-3042/02 by Mr Miller (2) and H-0594/03 by Mr Papayannakis during question time at Parliament's October 2003 session (3).

1

2

3

---

(1)  OJ C 70 E, 20.3.2004, p. 211.

1

(2)  See page 499.

2

(3)  Written reply, 21.10.2003.

3

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(a)

              Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants


  The Board of Directors and Stockholders
  The Netplex Group, Inc.


  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
  The Netplex Group, Inc., on Form S-8 (No. 333-19115) of our report dated
  February 23, 2001 (except for note 1 as to which the date is March 22, 2001),
  with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of The Netplex Group, Inc., and
  subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000, and the related consolidated statement
  of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows and the related schedule
  for the year then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2000, Annual
  Report on Form 10-K of The Netplex Group, Inc.

  Grant Thornton LLP

  Vienna, Virginia
  March 27, 2001
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not

precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________________

No. 96-40126

(Summary Calendar)

_________________________

GERALD KING, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JUDY L. KILGORE, Nurse at

Michael Unit; SANDRA SHEPARD,

Nurse at Michael Unit; WILLIAM B. COX,

Sgt. at Michael Unit; DAVID L. HINSON, JR.

Officer at Michael Unit,

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________________________________________

Appeal from United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(6:95-CV-363)

__________________________________________________

September 9, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gerald King appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(d). King contends that the district court abused its discretion by dismissing his
 

1See Mendoza, 989 F.2d at 195.

2

complaint because he alleged a constitutional claim and demonstrated that his claim had an arguable

basis in law and fact.

Deliberate indifference to a prisoner’sseriousmedicalneed constitutes anEighthAmendment

violation cognizable under §1983. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 105-07 (1976). Delay in

obtaining medical treatment for an inmate’s serious medical need can only constitute an Eighth

Amendment violation ifthere has been deliberate indifference resulting in substantial harm. Mendoza

v. Lynaugh, 989 F.2d 191, 195 (5th Cir. 1993). King alleged in his complaint that the denial of

medical attention prolonged his asthma attack and caused himpain,suffering, and discomfort. While

an asthma attack is a serious and potentially deadly problem, even construed under the liberal

standard due pro se pleadings,1 King has not alleged facts showing that he experienced substantial

harm due to the delay. Moreover, King acknowledged that he received care up until 1:30 p.m.,

though the care provided did not stop the attack. Complaints about unsuccessful medical treatment

do not give rise to a civil rights action. Johnson v. Treen, 759 F.2d 1236, 1238 (5th Cir. 1985);

Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). As King’s claims do not rise to the level

of a constitutional claim, his claimslack basisin law and the dismissal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(d)

was not an abuse of discretion.

AFFIRMED.
USCIB: 5. 2/99 

27 June 1955 24 

'f0P srieRB!' = B. 6. l!i!"FB Qtll .. ¥ 

M]MQRANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Tentative Minutes. 

1. Attached is a COP.Y of the tentative minu~es for ~he 116th meeting 

of USCIB. Please advise the Secretary if any changes are desired. 

2. To permit consideration of the final version of these minutes at 

the 117th meeting, it is requested that comments be submitted. to this 

office by 1200, Wednesday, 6 July 1955. 

Enclosure 

1 copy of Tentative Minutes, 

ll6th meeting of USCIB. 

~t 

1.t (fl.,~ 

~SC 118: 1~ 1 

'-' .. ~ , /3 : , ., · 'I 1 

Lt Cj C!. I~ : "f · .J/ f' f 

USCIB: 5.2/99 

TOP SECRET 

' .' ONES 

Secretary, USCIB 

eclassifi ed and a roved for release b NSA on 11-20-2014 ursuant to E .0. 1352 
~· 

QQNFI9BN'U:M. = U. 5. E'ffi9 6NLY 

ONE HUNDRED smEENTH MEXrING 

OF THE 

UNITED STATE'S COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE BOARD 

Lt. General Charles P. Cabell, US.AF, Acting Chainnan 

PRESENT: 

STATE: Mr. W. Park· Armstrong, Jr. 

DEFENSE: Mr. William H. Godel 

(for General Graves B. Erskine, USMC (Ret.)) 

NSA: 

ARMY: 

NAVY: 

AIR FORCE: 

CIA: 

Aero·. EXEC. SECY. : 

SECRETARIAT: 

ALSO PRESENT: 

STATE: 

DEFENSE: 

Mr. S. Drake Ellis 

(for Mr. L. V. Boardman) 

Lt. General Ralph J. Canine, USA 

Major General Robert A. Schow 

(for Major General Arthur G. Trudeau) 

Rear Admiral Robert W. Cavanagh 

{for Rear Admiral Carl F. Espe) 

Major General Millard Lewis 

for Ma"or General John A. Samford) 

for Mr. Huntington D. Sheldon 

Mr. H. D. Jones 

Lt. Colonel Henry C. Simmons, USAF 

Miss Regina Otto 

Mr. T. Achilles Polyzoides 

Mr. Robert F. Packard 

Mr. Philip J. Patton 

Major General John B. Ackerman, USAF 

Captain Jack S. Holtwick, Jr., USN 

Lt. Commander Paul J. Karl, Jr., USN 

CO Jl'Fl9E Jl''.f,'A L 

OGA 
11, • • • 

eeNPIBEN'fIAfi - U.S. B¥.SS ONE.¥ 

ARMY: 

AIR FORCE: 

Q!!: 

COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN: 

Lt. Colonel Richard Leffers 

Major Amie L. Millican 

Captain Rufus L. Taylor 

Commander William F. Bringle 

Lt. Colonel Frank J. Harrold, JI'. 

Captain Allen T. Miller 

Major William R. Culmer, USA (SECCOM) 

OGA 

The 116th Meeting of the United States Communications Intelligence 

Board was held in the Director's Conference Room, Administration Building, 

Central Intelligence Agency, at 1030,, Friday, 10 June 1955. 

- 2 -
# Pumping Plant (No.) (533) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Pumping Plant (No.) (533) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Pumping Plant (No.) (533).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website. 

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Pumping Plant (No.) (533) (9/2020) Standard Document(126.69 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Pumping Plant (No.) (533) Overview(549.45 KB)

Pumping Plant (No.) (533) CPPE(25.06 KB)

## Conservation at Work: Pumping Station

This video explores how Daniel Keudell of Aumsville, OR, worked with NRCS to update his irrigation system and install variable frequency drives.

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         136,217
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               26,828,781
<ALLOWANCES>                                   430,000
<INVENTORY>                                 32,871,072
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            61,105,446
<PP&E>                                      47,791,974
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,037,526
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              94,570,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,328,825
<BONDS>                                     23,406,122
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,043,423
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                94,570,898
<SALES>                                     55,493,345
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            55,493,345
<CGS>                                       46,120,374
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               46,120,374
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,946,225
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             417,013
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,009,733
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,622,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,387,733
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,387,733
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        

</TABLE>
#### Brahm, Appellant, vs. M. C. Gehl Company and others, Respondents.

*April 10*—

May 2, *1911.*

*'Corporations: Stoclc issued, for good will of business: Fraud: Findings: Evidence.*

A finding by the trial court that no false representations were made as to the value of the good will of a business, for which good will, upon incorporation of the business, certain shares of stock were issued, is *held*to be sustained by the evidence.

Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for Milwaukee county: WakkeN D. TaeeaNt, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Equitable action brought by plaintiff to cancel ten shares of stock alleged to have been.fraudulently issued to tbe defendant *Mary E. Gehl,*wife of tbe defendant *M. C. Gehl,*and also to cancel one share of stock alleged to have been fraudulently issued to *M. C. Gehl.*At tbe close of tbe evidence tbe court made findings negativing fraud, and entered judgment dismissing tbe plaintiff’s complaint, from which judgment tbe plaintiff appealed.

*A. J. Eimermann,*for tbe appellant.

*239For the respondents the canse was submitted on the brief -of *John H. Paul.*

ViNje, J.

The single question presented by this appeal is •one of fact. The trial court found that no false or fraudulent representations were made by the defendants as to the ■value of the good will of the business, for which ten shares of ■stock were issued to the wife of the defendant *M. C. GeM.*There is ample testimony to sustain this finding and, that being so, the question of estoppel is eliminated. It is. significant, as respondents urge, that for two years and a half, while plaintiff was president of the corporation and drawing a salary of $60 per month, he failed to discover that the value of the good will had been misrepresented, but made such discovery the moment he lost his office and salary. As to the one share of stock issued to *M. 0.*GeM, it is undisputed that it was issued for personal property turned over by him to the ■corporation. It would serve no useful purpose to review the ■evidence upon which the findings of the court are based.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT 23.2


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Carver Bancorp, Inc.:

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the annual report on Form 10-K
of Carver  Bancorp,  Inc.  and  subsidiaries  of our report  dated June 29, 2006
relating  to the  consolidated  statements  of  financial  condition  of  Carver
Bancorp,  Inc. and  subsidiaries  as of March 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related
consolidated   statements  of  income,   changes  in  stockholders'  equity  and
comprehensive  income,  and cash  flows for each of the years in the  three-year
period ended March 31, 2006,  which report  appears in the March 31, 2006 annual
report on Form 10-K of Carver Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries.

KPMG LLP
New York, New York
June 29, 2006
<PAGE>   1



EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Net earnings attributable to common shares:
<S>                                                    <C>        
     Net income                                        $   868,333
     Deemed dividend on redemption of convertible
         preferred stock                                  (666,665)
                                                       -----------
     Net earnings attributable to common shares        $   201,668
                                                       ===========

Actual weighted average shares outstanding               4,554,285

Primary earnings per share                             $      0.04
                                                       ===========

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995

Net earnings attributable to common shares:
     Net income                                        $   868,333
     Deemed dividend on redemption of convertible
         preferred stock                                  (666,665)
                                                       -----------
     Net earnings attributable to common shares        $   201,668
                                                       ===========

Actual weighted average shares outstanding               4,554,285

Fully diluted earnings per share                       $      0.04
                                                       ===========

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bairnco Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Luke E. Fichthorn III, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ Luke E. Fichthorn, III

Luke E. Fichthorn, III

Chairman &

Chief Executive Officer





#







EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bairnco Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth L. Bayne, Vice President Finance & Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



3.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



4.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ Kenneth L. Bayne

Kenneth L. Bayne

Vice President Finance &

Chief Accounting Officer



#