alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,473,000
<SECURITIES>                                 6,527,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,104,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,653,000
<PP&E>                                      80,036,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (33,996,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              68,693,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,419,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,785,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                68,693,000
<SALES>                                     45,991,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            45,991,000
<CGS>                                       38,353,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               38,353,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (125,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,287,000
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,900,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,387,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,387,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04
        

</TABLE>
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 29, 2014

No. 04-14-00372-CR

Andres Ramon JUAREZ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR0936B

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

ORDER

A Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal has been filed in this appeal 

in which the trial court judge certifies that the underlying criminal case “is a plea-bargain case, 

and the defendant has NO right of appeal” and “defendant has waived the right of appeal.” It is 

therefore ORDERED that the trial court clerk electronically file a clerk’s record, no later than

June 9, 2014, containing the following documents:

1. All pre-trial orders and the related pre-trial motions;

2. The Court Admonishments, the Waiver, Consent to Stipulation of Testimony and 

Stipulations, and all other documents relating to the defendant’s plea bargain;

3. The judgment;

4. All post-judgment motions and orders;

5. The notice of appeal;

6. The Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal; and

7. The criminal docket sheet.

The clerk of this court is ORDERED to send a copy of this order to the attorneys of record, the 

trial court clerk, and the court reporter(s) responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in this 

appeal.
_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of May, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# CE2004078EN.01093301.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/933 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/933

---

(2004/C 78 E/0987)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0109/04

by Claude Moraes (PSE) to the Commission

(19 January 2004)

Subject:   Sikhs and the banning of religious articles of faith

Subject:

Is the European Commission aware of the implications for the Sikh community in any EU Member State which is considering the banning of religious articles of faith?

Is any action or analysis of this situation, which is of deepening concern to ethnic minority Europeans, being taken at EU level?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(17 February 2004)

(17 February 2004)

The Commission is monitoring the developments the Honourable Member refers to through an ongoing dialogue with religious and ideological groups, based on deep respect for religious diversity. Should violations of fundamental rights (including freedom of religion) occur, under Community law, the Commission would take the appropriate action to ensure that these rights were respected.

---
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Michael J. McCann, Chief Financial Officer, PHI, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: November 8, 2007         By:                          /s/ Michael J. McCann    Michael J. McCann    Chief Financial Officer
Second Amendment to Contract of Sale related to 100 & 200 Campus Drive



 Exhibit 10.7 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT OF SALE 
 This SECOND AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT OF SALE (this
“Amendment”) dated as of July 30, 2008 by and between 100/200 CAMPUS DRIVE, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, having an address at 245 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10167 (“Seller”) and KBS CAPITAL
ADVISORS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, having an address at 590 Madison Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, New York 10022 (“Purchaser”). 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, Seller and Purchaser entered into that certain Contract of Sale, dated as of
July 17, 2008, and amended by that certain Amendment to Contract of Sale, dated as of July 25, 2008 (as amended, the “Contract”). 
 WHEREAS, Seller and Purchaser desire to amend the terms of the Contract as hereinafter set forth. 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth in this Amendment, in consideration of other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound
hereby, Seller and Purchaser hereby covenant and agree as follows: 
 1. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the
meanings ascribed to such terms in the Contract. 
 2. The deadline for the execution of the Park Avenue Agreement and the termination of the
Contract in accordance with Section 4.6 of the Contract shall be extended to July 31, 2008. 
 3. Except insofar as
reference to the contrary is made in any such instrument, all references to the “Contract of Sale” in any future correspondence or notice shall be deemed to refer to the Contract as modified by this Amendment. 
 4. Except as expressly modified or amended by this Amendment, all of the terms, covenants and conditions of the Contract are hereby ratified and
confirmed. 
 5. This Amendment may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, with the same
effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were on the same instrument. 
 6. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of New Jersey, without regard to principles of conflicts of laws. 
 7. Delivery of this Amendment by
facsimile by any party shall represent a valid and binding execution and delivery of this Amendment by such party. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Seller and Purchaser have executed and delivered this Amendment as of the date
first above written. 
  

							
	SELLER:
	
	100/200 CAMPUS DRIVE, L.L.C.
			
		 	By:	 	Campus Drive Realty Holding Co., Inc.
				
		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Cavarly E. Garrett

		 		 	Name:	 	Cavarly E. Garrett
		 		 	Title:	 	Vice President


 [Signatures continued on the next page] 







 [Signatures continued from previous page] 
  

			
	PURCHASER:
	
	KBS CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC,
	a Delaware limited liability company
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.

	Name:	 	Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.
	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          80,051
<SECURITIES>                                    24,918
<RECEIVABLES>                                  138,133
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,550
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               284,979
<PP&E>                                          81,325
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,070
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 351,206
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          107,050
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           589
<OTHER-SE>                                     241,561
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   351,206
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               612,041
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  531,034
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,296)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,683
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 199
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 83,104
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,164
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             51,940
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    51,940
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.83
        

</TABLE>
# CE2004078EN.01065501.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/655 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/655

---

(2004/C 78 E/0697)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3836/03

by Emmanouil Bakopoulos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(8 December 2003)

Subject:   VAT for transport service providers

Subject:

The transport sector in the European Union is governed by various tax regimes. For instance, a Belgian transport service provider may transport its customers to Athens in a coach belonging to a Greek company, transport them from there to Vienna with an Austrian company and take them to their final destination in the Netherlands in a coach belonging to a Dutch company. The problem facing this service provider — which is essentially providing its customers with a package and therefore uses subcontractors — is the how to calculate VAT for such a service.

In this specific example, will the Commission say how VAT is to be levied so that all the subcontractors involved in providing services meet their tax obligations?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(20 January 2004)

(20 January 2004)

Since Community VAT legislation is based on a Directive (the Sixth VAT Directive — Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977) each Member State is responsible for the transposition of these provisions into national legislation and their correct application within its territory. In the light of this, and the basic principle of subsidiarity, national tax administrations have the principal responsibility for informing their taxable persons about the interpretation and application of these provisions.

According to Article 9(2)(b) of the Sixth VAT Directive the place of supply of transport services is the place where the transport takes place, having regards of the distances covered. Therefore, in the example quoted, it is up to each individual Member State to determine how VAT is to be levied and which obligations each subcontractor has to fulfil on its territory.

The Commission is aware of the problems which can occur in the field of taxation of passenger transport services and in the framework of its review and update of VAT Strategy priorities (1). it has undertaken to look at the simplification of the obligations for traders in the field of VAT in the third quarter of 2004 as well as at the issue of the place of taxation of passenger transport services in 2005.

1

---

(1)  COM(2003) 614 final of 20.10.2003.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PAUL JOSEPH BEGNOCHE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 435 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of November, 2016

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                              CONSENT OF GUARANTOR


         The undersigned, Orient Power Holdings Limited, a Bermuda company
("Orient Power"), for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, hereby consents to the foregoing
Fifth Amendment to License Agreement ("Fifth Amendment") and reaffirms its
guarantee of the performance by Jiangsu Electronics Industries Limited ("Jiangsu
Electronics") or any sublicensee of Jiangsu Electronics (Jiangsu Electronics and
any sublicensee are hereinafter collectively referred to as "Jiangsu") of all of
Jiangsu's obligations under (a) the Fifth Amendment and (b) that certain License
Agreement between Koss Corporation, as Licensor, and Trabelco N.V., as Licensee,
dated November 15, 1991, as amended by an Amendment to License Agreement dated
November 15, 1991, and a Second Amendment to License Agreement dated September
29, 1995, and a Third Amendment and Assignment of License Agreement dated as of
March 31, 1997 between Trabelco N.V., Jiangsu Electronics, Hagemeyer Electronics
(N.A.), Inc., Hagemeyer Consumer Products, Inc. d/b/a/ Koss Electronics
Products, KCP Limited and Koss Corporation, and a Fourth Amendment to License
Agreement dated May 29, 1998 (collectively, that certain License Agreement and
the amendments thereto are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "License
Agreement"). Orient Power also guarantees the payment to Koss Corporation of any
and all amounts owed to Koss Corporation by Jiangsu under the Fifth Amendment
and the License Agreement, including but not limited to, the royalty obligations
and indemnity obligations of Jiangsu thereunder.

                                   ORIENT POWER HOLDINGS LIMITED



Dated: March 30, 2001          By: /s/ Poon Ka Hung
       -------------------        --------------------------------------------

                             Name:
                                  -------------------------------------------

                            Title: Chief Executive Officer

                                   -------------------------------------------
# CE2004084EN.01009103.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/91 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/91

---

(2004/C 84 E/0114)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3722/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject:   Update concerning the funds for the SAVE II programme for the municipality of Florence

Subject:

With reference to question E-0963/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of Florence (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the SAVE II programme, the Commission replied on 25 April 2003 to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

1

Can the Commission state whether, since then and up to the present, it has received any SAVE II projects from that municipality?

---

(1)  OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

1

---
----

            COUNCIL DECISION         

of 17 July 2006         

amending Decision 1999/468/EC laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission

(2006/512/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the third indent of Article 202 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the Opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Decision 1999/468/EC is hereby amended as follows:

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 17 July 2006.

For the Council

The President

E. TUOMIOJA            

----

(1)  Not yet published in the Official Journal.

(2)OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 (the "Report"), I,
Lance F. Bospflug, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



Petroleum Helicopters, Inc.



By: /s/ Lance F. Bospflug
    ---------------------------------
    Lance F. Bospflug
    Chief Executive Officer
    August 14, 2002
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of St. Joseph Capital Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I,
Edward R. Pooley, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Edward R. Pooley
--------------------------

Edward R. Pooley
Principal Financial Officer


March 24, 2003
USCIB: 14.1/28 

TEhntmfeAJrf'AS 919 §... 

• ~?4~ 

~-

27 October 1954 

'f fl SE6Rl!!'!' 

HEMORANDUM FOR THE MfilMl3ERS CF uscm: 

Subject: Revision of the UKUSA Agreement. 

References: (a) USCIB 14.1/24 of 15 September 1954. 

(b) USCIB l4.i/26 of 5 October 1954. 

1. At its 21st meeti~r 22 October 1954, USCIBEC considered rei'erence 

(a) in light of rei'erence (bJ. I 

2. Ai'ter discussion or the matter USCIBEC agreed to recommend to 

USCIB approval or reference (a), subject to the i'ollowing: • 

(a) That appendices c, D, E, L, and M be considered technical 

append.ices, with the understanding that all members of USCIB will be 

informed in writing through the Executive Secretary, USCIB, or every change in these appendices that may be agreed between NSA and GCHQ. 

(b) That appendices F and K tentatively be considered policy appendices subject to further consideration at the next meeting of USCIBEC. 

3. This action of USCIBEC is forwarded ror consideration by USCIB. 

In the absence of objection by any member prior to 1200, Friday, 5 November 1954, the decision recorded above will be considered approved. 

4. THIS DOOUMENT CONTAillS Q(}J]M(JNICATIONS nr.IELLIGENCE INFORMATION 

AND SHALL BE HANDLED ONLY m CHANNELS EXPRESSLY PROVIDED FOR CCMDIT. 

I 

R 

Ca n, u. s. Navy 

Executive Secretary, USCIB 

USCIB: 14.1/28 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-26-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
= — —__—. CORO, +

DISPOSITION FORM # |. qe iM
june SUNSTT 50GB Diary for Week 4-8 June 1986
TO wop (woaE) .. FROM RDGB On 3b en 36 ern |

1. Received a copy of a progran (Ocean Gravitational Surveys) proposed
the U.S. Mavy to provide capability for acquisition of gravinetris dete: Parte
(g) ‘Mi* Program pertinent to WDD vere extracted and forvarded to WD for comment,

2, Ooordinated on « THI to WDD exempting then from requirement for Project
Cost Accounting, (0) 8 Fea 4

3. Talked with Colonel Ritland with reference to IREM-ICEM IDC, Mvised
ettice, Prepared TMX sonfraiag tha rape econ sine a 2590 4m Be
office. Prepared confirming telephone conversation, subsequen
Fequest of General Schriever, this was changed to 0930, 16 sh a)

Development Plan, Advised EDSTI, who will answer the letter, that this volume -
hed been withdrawn and would be reissued later this sonth at wiich time AFOAT
would be placed on the distribution list for two copies. WED notified of the

above by DF. (U) , |

{iias on IREM and Facilities vill be shown to special groups as requested, |

Lt Colonel,
Assistant Chief
Office of the Assistant to the Commander

;
-SGRFIDENTIAL 0643633

BD .2% 96 REPLACES WME FORM 96, 1 GT. 48, WHICH MAY BE USED Me 51001-8 ‘©. ©, COvEAMMENT PeunTine erricE, tse o-2es0e1

1