alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000351385
<NAME> ASTRO COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                         451,724
<SECURITIES>                                   811,332
<RECEIVABLES>                                  770,442
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    849,571
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,933,375
<PP&E>                                       1,145,038
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,003,837
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,641,633
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,238,486
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        71,818
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,197,114
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,641,633
<SALES>                                        930,911
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               978,211
<CGS>                                          224,035
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  805,619
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                172,592
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,551
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            159,041
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   159,041
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Wallace, Administratrix, Respondent, vs. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company, Appellant.

*April 20*

May *10, 1904.*

*Robertson v. C., St. P., M. & O. R. Co., ante,*p. 66, followed.

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for St. Croix county: E. W. Helms, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Pierce Butler*and *Frawley, Bundy & Wilcox,*and oral argument *by Mr. Butler.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *F. D. Larrabee*and *Jas. A. Frear,*and oral argument by *N. H. Clapp.*

Cassoday, C. J.

In this case the plaintiff’s intestate was killed in the same wreck mentioned in the case of *Robertson v. C., St.*P., *M. & O. R. Co., ante,*p. 66, 99 N. W. 433. The complaint in each case and the demurrer thereto are substantially the same. In this case the intestate was a resident and citizen of Minnesota at the time of his death, and the plaintiff is his widow, and was appointed personal representative by the court of Minnesota.. The decision in the other case rules this case.

*By the Court.*— The order of the circuit court is affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 4.01

dsl.net, Inc. transferable on the books of the Company by the holder hereof in
person or by its duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate
properly endorsed or assigned.  This Certificate and the shares represented
hereby are issued and shall be held subject to the laws of the State of Delaware
and the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and the By-laws of the
Company, as amended from time to time, to which the holder by acceptance hereof
assents.  This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned and registered by
the Transfer Agent and Registrar.

     Witness and facsimile seal of the Company and the facsimile signatures of
its duly authorized officers.


Dated:                                            President



                                                  Secretary


                                 Dsl.net, Inc.

     The Company is authorized to issue more than one call or series of stock.
Upon written request the Company will furnish without charge to each stockholder
a copy of the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating,
optional or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and
the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or
rights.


For value received,________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto

________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________ Shares of the
common stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably
constitute and appoint _______________________________________ Attorney to
transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Company with full power
of substitution in the premises.

Dated: ________________________

SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED:


________________________________________________________________
THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR
INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS
AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE
GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         8,695
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  355,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    338,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               722,503
<PP&E>                                         4,243,136
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,909,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,063,896
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,170,752
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       11,129,954
<OTHER-SE>                                     (10,236,810)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,063,896
<SALES>                                        604,117
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               604,117
<CGS>                                          430,102
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  430,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               202,018
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (28,004)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (20,885)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (47,002)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (47,002)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (47,002)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (47,002)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.00
        

</TABLE>
co' 'FHJM~1,.W'I? = AS 1 • ..7 3 7 

d - . - -- - • 

USCIB: 5.4/~ HANDLE vlA COMINI CHANNELS ONLY 

21 July 1955 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

References: 

Conformance with Minimum Standards Governing 

Connnunications Security Systems. 

(a) USCIB Directive Number 9 (Revised) dated 

4 February 1954. 

(b) USCIB 5.4/18 dated 13 December 1954. 

l. The members of USCIB, other than the Department of Defense 

member and the Federal Bureau of Investigation member who operate 

no facilities for the electrical transmission of COMINT, have all 

reported that they have examined their COMSEC systems, procedures, 

practices and training programs for the transmission of COMINT by electric~ means and have detennined that they are operating in conf onnanee with the minimum standards approved by USCIB for that purpose. 

2. It is requested that the next semiannual inspection be 

perfonned in time to permit a report to be forwarded to this office 

by l December 1955. 

USCIB 

USCIB: 5.4/2!J HANDLE V!tt eOMIN'i' 6HldHHSLS ONLY 

24 

eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 

9-05-2014 ursuantto E.O. 13526
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I In connection with the quarterly report of Science Dynamics Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Joe Noto, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

November 20, 2006                                        /s/ Joe Noto
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Joe Noto
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-89,522-01

EX PARTE MARIO SIFUENTEZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. CR-16-0669-A IN THE 428 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HAYS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of driving while

intoxicated and sentenced to forty-five years’ imprisonment. 

Applicant contends, among other things, that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance

because counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. 

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); Ex parte

Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. 
2

As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is

the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order counsel to provide a

supplemental affidavit in response to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel

addressing, at a minimum, whether he determined if Applicant wanted to appeal. The trial court may

use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant

was denied his right to a meaningful appeal because Applicant’s counsel failed to timely file a notice

of appeal. The trial court shall make specific findings addressing whether trial counsel discharged

his duties in accordance with the requirements of Jones v. State, 98 S.W.3d 700, 703 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2003). The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it

deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: March 20, 2019

Do not publish
MEMO R91NG SLIP NEVER USE FOR APRilE'.~..f>'~M 6 6 9 

CONCURRENCES. OR S!.•L.._,AC'!'!ONS 

I NAME OR TITLE INITIALS 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION DATE 

2 

3 

4 

.~ 

CIRCULATE 

COORDINATION 

FILE 

INFORMATION 

NECESSARY ACTION 

NaTE ANO RETURN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

eclassified and approved for release by 

SA on 12-16-2014 ursuantto E .0. 1352 

FROM NAME OR TITLE DATE 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION TELEPHONE 

DD FORM 9 5 Replaces DA AOO Foim 895, l Apr 48, and AFHQ 

I FEB 50 Form 12, 10 Nov 47, whioh may be used. 
1'111' f leccriber l'S4 

IQH)!~ J'Oll 'ntE illliRI> l ~ 

SV&JIO'li Itloludon ot Colamerc111 CJ"nt.o,vap1".1o Jlaterl.al o.n the () 

l:Pternaticmal anbargo L.1.A 

1. l ..ting aa held cm ' Dec•ber l9S4 at the "Department ot State 

in the ottic:e of Mr. 't. A. Pol,)1'0idAsa, fer purpo1e1 ot 4iacuea1n.g th• 

above «tbJect. TM tol.low1ng were preeerlt s 

•• t. A. Pol.1so1de11 state (SPS) Ill'. L. ll. Pomero;r, stat• (Otfioe ot Jlunj,tiona Control) U.. O'Gl.. O. J. Libert., O!D (ISA) 

lit',. w. r • .Pri.adman • NSJi. 

l!r. J. R. i:.u,:las, NS>. 

L Col&mel Libert rniewed the aitlUltion u it; bad dnaloped in a 

noel. CXltXll •.t.ina in Pana. At that t.ime the "1t.r1ou• .. bera or WCVM 

prtwted their rniaion• of' certain portim• ~ t.he International llr'barao 

ts.at tor =n.eideration. The ispec1ti'l ite:! oor.cerned• 1.e,, CC""..n.trei&l 

~O"'Pl"J.o 4MlU11&•~t • bad been retained. on th• 11.t.• preHn.te,1 b7 llOm• 

•t-\ha u.tion• but tJ,e U.I(. w18hed to rs.eve the itar.. The reason• given 

w.re ot a gmeral. nature, er.d Colonel U.beft b.Ueft:i that the U.K. m.anter 

WI Mlow:l.r.s tm. 11•ual. n.tc. poliey ot rc.Ovin& •• uiv it•a f'fQlil th• ~ 

la'bar~ U.t u poeeibl• tor pu.relJ e.'.l0:"'1crr.1c reaaone. 

J• !he v.s. Jmftber va• unp:rapued ror thia ite end uketl tor in.true:.• 

Uona troa Wa1hintton. 

4' At t.he .-.eait rJO r.al prc:bl.f91'.' axista tor IBA, wt il there could 

lie • cmic•. it 'lllOUld be preterabl• to bav• no conllttreiallY available 

csr;r.ptop-apbie :J.t.eo!9 on the liet·• iltr.ouzb lh-11 Poqt&Oides eould eippreat!d 

o.t&te 

Ccl.Dr..l 

thi• poa1tion, 

Libert. Mr. 

tho 

1Pr1edl!".ar1 

reel reucr.a 

poh'lted 

could 

011t, 

not. 

ho\l«V•r, 

1Mt c:Lnin 

that 

to ::·r. 

ct the 

~ 

sccr.:.erCi.al concenie known to him, the ttir"O ol greater iall'Ort.e.nce weN 1n 

eoantries not ~bere ot OfJOOM a?'d, th&r9foro, llClt. aW>ject to any pro-

'919.ior.• ot ~. lier. Frl.e&r.an stated that thp·o nre no r.anutacturera 

at eumaercial orntor,rephic err~~er1t ir. tt.. i:lritieh COsnonvealth of t:ationa, - arid ~ otbar J:r.11111ut'act.urera lm.C'1m ttere appeare-:i to bit no rtasori to b9 conceftled about. fllf¥ Ml•• ot theU' eCIJip.r.:ent t.o the Soviet Bloc. 

s. !be 11Mt11lg ends-! with A&l"inrMn1. on a u.e. po•ition not to prees 

for ~mtion of t.ld• ..rt. of it• on th• International &bal-go u.i. 

J»!ES H. lXJtl.ll.AS 

1'J.¥:.S ft JlolJ.q Div1aion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7437
HOWARD BRYAN HARMON, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-1038-R) Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 4, 1998 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Howard Bryan Harmon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court'sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Harmon v. Virginia , No. CA-96-1038-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 22, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
 
                                  Exhibit 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-4 No. 333-67981 as amended as of March 22, 1999) and the Registration
Statements (Forms S-8 Nos. 33-1502, 333-31047) pertaining to the 1985 Incentive
Stock Option Plan, the 1994 Incentive Stock Option Plan, the 1995 Director Stock
Option Plan, the 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1995 Stock Option Plan
and non-statutory stock options granted to directors and officers of IDX Systems
Corporation and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-31045)
pertaining to the PHAMIS, Inc. Amended and Restated 1983 Combined Nonqualified
and Incentive Stock Option Plan, the PHAMIS, Inc. 1993 Combined Incentive and
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan as amended through May 14, 1996, the PHAMIS Inc.
1994 Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan as amended through January 1, 1996,
the PHAMIS, Inc. Salary Savings and Deferral Plan and Trust as amended through
February 22, 1996 and the PHAMIS, Inc. Cain Option Agreement, of our report
dated February 2, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of IDX Systems Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-
K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                              Ernst & Young LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
March 29, 1999
____ ......,, _________________________ _ 

SECURITY "IFICATION Cl/ 11a1) 

DISPOSITION FORM 

FILE NO. 

To Ctd.eta o~orticea and 

·;t.atr Divisions 

1. fUOJlLVl'IQN 

I SUBJECT 

Dipst ot Statt' Conference. '2!J December 195.3 

FROM c/s DATE 30 Dec S3 COMMENT NO. 1 

/.ct.vised that PROD is experiencing ditticulty authorising, because ot 

:J..;s questionatle legality, the destruction or raw traffic aDd other clusitied 

;zat91'1.al.a. Sf.ated that PROD would continue to operate on the same be.sis that 

'.he.v have in the past but emphasized the urgent need tor a d1rective on this 

;roblan. 

2. ~1..S AND fOLICX 

Bei»rted that the long Range Comwnicat1ons Security Equipnant Plan 

wuld be ntJ4y on 29 January 1954. 

J. Jl~mmJG 

SfAated that '1'110 is 11()".f operating on the Second tloor or Build1.ng l, and 

t.ttat it 1d.ll p.-obabq be ten dqa betoro tbeir telephone cammmicationa are 

completel,y inatalJ ed. 

4. !IP.lmARTERS QCJ!!AM>A!« 

a. Reported the tranater ot iJ,81000 1n .tunda to AHS to prov.I.de tor tb9 

construction or a powr aub-atation, td.th a 2400 DA capadt,y, to increase tbe 

power d1atr1bution to A and B Buildinga. 

b. a.&rked t.hat tho apecU'ications tor the alteration ot buildings at 

VHPS haw hem received lllld that 1151000 bu been requested as an advance to 

initiate t.he contract :lmediatel;y. Additional. .f'unda vlll be provided. 11hen firm 

••time.tea have been :received trcm co, AHS, on the total. cost. 

~A/~ K. W. GREBttE 

lat Lt., Int. 

Asst. t~ the C/S 

CONFIDENTIAL 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-29-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

DD , ~~~M50 9 6 REPLACES NME FORM 96, I OCT 48. WHICH MAY BE USED 18-&&801-3 Uo s. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFlCE
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 38 (Thursday, February 26, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 10390]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03858]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

48 CFR Parts 218, 225, and 242


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Technical 
Amendments

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is making technical amendments to the Defense Federal 
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to provide needed editorial 
changes.

DATES: Effective February 26, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Manuel Quinones, Defense 
Acquisition Regulations System, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DARS), Room 3B941, 3060 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060. Telephone 571-372-6088; 
facsimile 571-372-6094.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule amends the DFARS as follows:
    1. Directs contracting officers to additional procedures and 
guidance by adding a reference to DFARS Procedures, Guidance, and 
Information PGI 218.272 at DFARS 218.272. A cross reference to DFARS 
218.272 is also added at DFARS 225.7405.
    2. Directs contracting officers to additional procedures and 
guidance by adding a reference to DFARS Procedures, Guidance, and 
Information PGI 242.7502 at DFARS 242.7502.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 218, 225, and 242

    Government procurement.

Manuel Quinones,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
    Therefore, 48 CFR parts 218, 225, and 242 are amended as follows:

0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 218, 225, and 242 continues 
to read as follows:

    Authority:  41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.

PART 218-EMERGENCY ACQUISITIONS

0
2. Add section 218.272 to read as follows:


218.272  Use of electronic business tools.

    When supporting a contingency operation or humanitarian or 
peacekeeping operation, follow the procedures at PGI 218.272 concerning 
the use of electronic business tools.

PART 225-FOREIGN ACQUISITION

0
3. Add section 225.7405 to read as follows:


225.7405  Use of electronic business tools.

    See 218.272 concerning the use of electronic business tools in 
support of a contingency operation or humanitarian or peacekeeping 
operation.

PART 242-CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES

0
4. Amend section 242.7502 by revising paragraph (g)(2) introductory 
text to read as follows:


242.7502  Policy.

* * * * *
    (g) * * *
    (2) The contracting officer responsible for negotiation of a 
proposal generated by an accounting system with an identified 
deficiency shall evaluate whether the deficiency impacts the 
negotiations. See also PGI 242.7502(g)(2). If it does not, the 
contracting officer should proceed with negotiations. If it does, the 
contracting officer should consider other alternatives, e.g.--
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-03858 Filed 2-25-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P