alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004084EN.01059901.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/599 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/599

---

(2004/C 84 E/0673)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0477/04

by Christopher Heaton-Harris (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(23 February 2004)

Subject:   Banana trade

Subject:

In 1998 the EU launched a three-year ‘New Banana Recovery programme’. Please could the Commission confirm if the productivity of bananas has been increased or decreased since this date?

Has an inquiry taken place following the three-year programme to ascertain if it was a success? If so, please give details.

Following the end of the recovery programme was a new Banana Recovery programme launched? If so, please give details. Who approved this programme?

Were any MEPs substantially involved in the Banana Recovery programme? If so, please give details.

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(24 March 2004)

(24 March 2004)

Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 of 13 February 1993 on the common organisation of the market in bananas (1) introduced management and support measures for this product.

1

On the structural aid side, measures to improve quality and competitiveness for the banana production chain were included in the 1994-1999 Operational Programmes for structural assistance in Objective 1 regions and were maintained for the period 2000-2006. There is however no specific ‘three-year programme’ of Structural Fund assistance for banana production.

Since the market organisation was set up launching aid has been available for banana producer groups.

There is also an income loss compensation scheme for producers. The rate applied is calculated for each marketing year.

A report assessing the effectiveness of the various market organisation measures is due at the end of this year.

---

(1)  OJ L 47, 25.2.1993.

1

---
# CE2004084EN.01009802.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/98 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/98

---

(2004/C 84 E/0130)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3783/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject:   Update on funding for the municipality of Macerata under the action programme to promote civil protection

Subject:

In reply to my earlier question E-1095/03 (1) asking whether the municipality of Macerata had submitted projects and obtained funding under the action programme to promote civil protection, the Commission said on 22 April 2003 that the municipality had not submitted any application.

1

Can the Commission say whether, since that date, any projects have been submitted and what the outcome was?

---

(1)  OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 144.

1

---
# C_2005106EN.01001202.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/12

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 26 January 2005

in Case C-153/04 P: Euroagri Srl v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Appeal - EAGGF - Financial participation - Pilot and demonstration project for the use of a new technique called ‘Endovena’ on fruit trees)

(2005/C 106/23)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-153/04 P, appeal under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, brought on 23 March 2004 by Euroagri Srl, established in Monte Vidon Combatte (Italy) (Lawyer: W. Massucci), the other party to the proceedings being the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: C. Cattabriga and L. Visaggio) — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, J. Makarczyk and P. Kūris (Rapporteur), Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has made an order on 26 January 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

Euroagri Srl

Commission of the European Communities

| 1. | The appeal is dimissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dimissed.

| 2. | Euroagri Srl shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Euroagri Srl shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 106 of 30.04.2004.

1

---
REF ID:A597 

NEYER USE FOR APPRO~DISA.PPROVALS, 

CONCURRENCF.s. OR SIMILAR ACTIONS 

CIRCULATE 

COORDINATION 

FILE 

NECESSARY ACTION 

NOTE AND RETURN 

SEE ME
National UAS Solutions, LLC

104 Raphael Drive

Lafayette, LA 70508

JuLY 2, 2015

Exemption No. 11570

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0347

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Request to amend Exemption No. 11570 to allow National UAS Solutions, LLC 

to add the MOZI ROBOTICS QUADTHRUST 350 sUAS platform under the same 

direction and limitations as provided within Exemption No. 11570, docket #FAA2015-0347, approved on May 13, 2015.

Dear Sir or Madam,

National UAS Solutions, LLC was issued an exemption under Section 333 of the “FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012” numbered 11570 for the purpose of gathering aerial 

data using the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ sUAS. Since the exemption was granted, National UAS 

Solutions, LLC has determined the need to add the MOZI ROBOTICS QUADTHRUST 350

quadcopter to the exemption in order to remain competitive and enhance services afforded our 

customers.

The airworthiness of the MOZI ROBOTICS QUADTHRUST 350 is materially similar and a 

direct replacement of the already approved DJI Phantom 2 Vision+. 

The MOZI ROBOTICS QUADTHRUST 350 has a gross weight under 55 pounds, forward 

speeds of less than 50 knots and an altitude restriction of under 400 feet. This sUAS will be 

operated in accordance with the limitations and restrictions enumerated in Exemption No. 11570 

already granted National UAS Solutions, LLC.
Because the requested amendment would not set any precedent or otherwise raise any novel 

issue, and because the addition of this sUAS platform to our fleet will not materially affect our 

already granted petition No. 11570 in any way, and because National UAS Solutions, LLC seeks 

to begin these operations without delay, National UAS Solutions, LLC respectfully requests the 

FAA to determine that good cause exists to dispense with publication of the summary of this 

petition in the Federal Register and grant the requested amendment expeditiously by summary 

means.

Thank you for your kind consideration in the granting of this amendment.

Best regards,

Charles R. O’Neal, Jr.

President/CEO

National UAS Solutions, LLC

Lafayette, Louisiana 70508

337.288.1793

coneal@nationaluassolutions.com
MOZI ROBOTICS QUADTHRUST 350 SPECIFICATIONS

Weight (including battery and propellers: 1250g or 2.75 pounds

Hover Accuracy: Vertical: 0.8 m/ 2.6 feet

Horizontal: 2.5 m/8.2 feet

Max Yaw Angular Velocity: 200 degrees/sec

Max Tiltable Angle: 35 degrees

Max Ascent/Descent Speed: Ascent: 6m/sec or 1200fpm

Descent: 2 m/sec or 390fpm

Max Forward Flight Speed: 15m/sec or 33.5mph

Safety: Return to Home Failsafe

(loss of signal and low battery)

Diagonal Motor to Motor Distance: 350mm or 13.780 inches

Engines: 4 T-Motor MN2214 (electric)

Battery: 11.1V 5100mAh LiPo Battery
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                            3009
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    35829
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      29737
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 70604
<PP&E>                                          238335
<DEPRECIATION>                                  120928
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  194337
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            34981
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           508
<OTHER-SE>                                       85150
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    194337
<SALES>                                         105401
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                105651
<CGS>                                            89489
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    96056
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2019
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   7576
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3013
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4563
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4563
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .90
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1643 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1643

  To require a report on actions to secure the safety and security of 
                dissidents housed at Camp Liberty, Iraq.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 23, 2015

   Mr. Blunt introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require a report on actions to secure the safety and security of 
                dissidents housed at Camp Liberty, Iraq.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring the Safety and Security of 
Iranian Dissidents in Iraq Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON ACTIONS TO SECURE THE SAFETY AND SECURITY OF 
              DISSIDENTS HOUSED AT CAMP LIBERTY, IRAQ.

    Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of State shall certify, in writing, to the committee on 
Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of 
the House of Representatives whether or not the Central Government of 
Iraq is taking appropriate and sufficient actions to ensure the safety 
and security of dissidents housed at Camp Liberty, Iraq.
                                 <all>
```
REF ID:A72078 

J)r. Charles TO!lpkSns 

Batt.anal Bureau ot Standard.a 

Bn11d1ng JU 

Dllivand.t7 of calitOl'Di& 

1aoS B1lgard Avmm 

Los ADgal.es 24, C&lif'ornia 

Serial: 1 5 34 

t 1.JUL 1952 

SOiie progrus has ceen mde on one of the points you raised in 

70ur letter oL 26 M.q l9S2 to Admiral Wenger. As ,ou knov.. clearances 

require considerable time for inveat.t.gati.on am final action. Fortunatel.71 in the cases of Dr. Fred D. Rigby am. Mrs. Bet.tie v.. ii. Frankl 

suf'.t1cient intonatl.on was alzeady on file t4 obtain the necessar,y 

clearances !or thea. In the oaae of Mr. J. J. WOl.t• it was necessary 

to obtain a PBS and tingerprints; the completed torma nave been received 

but it will t.ake several weeks tor a check am an evaluation. 

In Viev ot the established clearances tor Dr. Rigby' am Mrs. Frankl 

you cou.ld, ot course. proceed lid.th the first phase of -your proposal as 

ouU1nai to Admiral Wenger• i.e., hmxU ng over to Dr. Rigby and to Mrs. 

Frankl the combina ti.on ot the lock to your storage file am discussing 

with t.hem same of the technical detalla. Aa ve understood 10ur pl.am 

tor the project on vh:!Dh t.hese three persons are to assist. JOU. the 

operational aspects were to be unier the super91sion of Mr. wolf and 

that it would not be mcessa1"7 1 for your purposes, that. he be told 

claas:l.tic details or tb.e real sign1.f'1cance ot what b.e is doing for you. 

If this is tl'\la I see no need to wait tor his clearance to cone throu31 

but vill leave '\bis pojat to 70ur diacret1.on. In arq cue J'OU vlll be 

adY1s«l jut. as soon as Mr. Woll' s clearance 1a approYed. 

Dr., eampa1gne and talR Gleason have probably UTiYed 1n Los A?Jgeles 

b7 now. am peztaaps Hrs.- waiters (the secret417..J.iJ:>nriaa) bu begun to 

use the sate nmt.ioned in your letter oL' 27 Juaa to me. Thank JOU tor 

kMptng u mr...i~ 

Copies furnished: 

AG (3) 

OOT 

I ~I WILLIAM P. nn:mu Collsul.~t 

W .F ~Friedma.n/eby/8 July 52 

Consultant/6o493 

MEMO FOR RECORD: Seli-e.xplanatoryQ T,he above mentioned people are being 

cleared tO work SO.- the SWIDller Seminar (SCAMP) being held in Los Angeles, arrl special problems of AFSA for Dr 9 Tompkinsa 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 02-18-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
Dr. Charles Tompkins, 

Najlio.nal Bureau of Standards, ~ ~ 0 

Building 3U f\_ 

University of California, 

405 Hilgard Avenue, 

Los Angil.es 24, Calif. 

Dear Dr. Tampkin1: ~)'V J-N om.e progress has been made on one of the points ,you raised in ,your "1> to Admiral Wenger1 Pal• a ( ).. As ,you know, c:learances require 

s ra.ble time for investigation and final action. Fortunaael,y, in the 

cases of Dr. Fred D. Rigby and Mrs. Bet tie V. \V. Frankl sufficient information was already on file to obtain the.necessary ~arances for them. 

In the case of Mr. J. J. VfOLF, ~pears necessary t obtain a PHS and a 

fingerprint card These WJ'& aee"' sent to i:r. Wolf, ·a Dr, Rigb,y, for 

llHeip\ 

completion~ia. 9£ tR.He le11e comp~eted u11M ·U•n forms" 

weeks 

have not 

are· 

yet 

necessary 

been received.. 

for a check 

Mll•a.: 

and 

"1i:-·M\ep 

an 

~ 

evaluation.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1348/2006

of 13 September 2006         

setting the allocation coefficient for issuing licences to import sugar products under tariff quotas and preferential agreements

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 950/2006 of 28 June 2006 laying down detailed rules for the 2006/07, 2007/08 and 2008/09 marketing years for importing and refining of sugar products under certain tariff quotas and preferential agreements (2), and in particular Article 5(3) thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2005/914/EC of 21 November 2005 on the conclusion of a Protocol amending the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, of the other part, on a tariff quota for the imports of sugar and sugar products originating in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia into the Community (3),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2151/2005 of 23 December 2005 laying down detailed rules for the opening and administration of the tariff quota for sugar products originating in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, as provided for in the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, of the other part (4), in particular Article 6(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Licences shall be issued within the quantitative limits set in the Annex to this Regulation in respect of applications for import licences submitted from 4 to 8 September 2006, in accordance with Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 950/2006.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 14 September 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 September 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 178, 1.7.2006, p. 1.

(3)OJ L 333, 20.12.2005, p. 44.

(4)OJ L 342, 24.12.2005, p. 26.

----

ANNEX

ACP-INDIA preferential sugar

Title IV of Regulation (EC) No 950/2006

2006/07 marketing year

Complementary sugar

Title V of Regulation (EC) No 950/2006

2006/07 Marketing year

CXL concessions sugar

Title VI of Regulation (EC) No 950/2006

2006/07 marketing year

Balkans sugar

Title VII of Regulation (EC) No 950/2006

2006/07 marketing year

Marketing year 2006

----
USCIB: 29.18/7 

'l[9i ii'.C~T Ya§a §¥ES 0§¥ 

~MJRANDID..f FOR TH!jf !fdURrS Ql USCIB: 

24 

:kPPENEl~ BeeMMS eetft'AIN 

sem: W9:RB lM?ERLY. 

8 June 1954 

EQ 3.3(h) (2) 

PL ~6-36/50 USC 3605 

Subject: \ UKUSA .... , -------------------.\ 

l. Pursuant to USCIB decision on item 2 of the agenda for the 

103rd Meeting, above subject, the enclosed report on US-UK conference 

agenda items "a" through "d" has been prepared by tht. ad hoc '1ommittee 

chaired by Mr. Francis A. Raven. The ad hoc committee report on 

items "e" and "f" is expected shortly. 

2. The committee's reconnnende.tions on all items, 11 a 11 through 

"e", are scheduled for consideration at the 11 June 1954 Meeting of 

USCIB (see item 2 of the agenda for the 104th Meeting). 

APPENDED DCC osms eolft'i:IN 

SGBE We.RB MA:'fi!IRIA:L 

USCIB: 29.18/7 

eclassifi ed and a ursuantto E .0. 1352
<TABLE>
                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1

BAIRNCO CORPORATION
CALCULATION OF PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 1996 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1995
(Unaudited)

<CAPTION>
                                           1996            1995       
<S>                                        <C>             <C>
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE:
   
Net income                                 $  1,938,000    $  1,893,000

Average common shares outstanding             9,735,000      10,469,253
Common shares issuable in respect to common
  stock equivalents, with a dilutive effect      94,000           5,114 
Total common and common equivalent shares     9,829,000      10,474,367

Primary Earnings Per Common Share          $       0.20    $       0.18


FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Net income                                 $  1,938,000    $  1,893,000

Total common and common equivalent shares     9,829,000      10,474,367
Additional common shares assuming full
  dilution                                          --              607
Total common shares assuming full dilution    9,829,000      10,474,974

Fully Diluted Earnings Per Common Share    $       0.20    $       0.18





Earnings per share are based on the average number of shares outstanding
during each period. Primary earnings per share include all common stock
equivalents.  Fully diluted earnings per share include all common stock
equivalents plus the additional common shares issuable assuming full
dilution.
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
                                                           EXHIBIT 11.2

BAIRNCO CORPORATION
CALCULATION OF PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 1996 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1995
(Unaudited)

<CAPTION>
                                           1996            1995       
<S>                                        <C>             <C>
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE:
   
Net income                                 $  6,246,000    $  5,855,000

Average common shares outstanding             9,839,000      10,489,924
Common shares issuable in respect to common
  stock equivalents, with a dilutive effect     116,000           2,464 
Total common and common equivalent shares     9,955,000      10,492,388

Primary Earnings Per Common Share          $       0.63    $       0.56


FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Net income                                 $  6,246,000    $  5,855,000

Total common and common equivalent shares     9,955,000      10,492,388
Additional common shares assuming full
  dilution                                          --            2,568
Total common shares assuming full dilution    9,955,000      10,494,956

Fully Diluted Earnings Per Common Share    $       0.63    $       0.56





Earnings per share are based on the average number of shares outstanding
during each period. Primary earnings per share include all common stock
equivalents.  Fully diluted earnings per share include all common stock
equivalents plus the additional common shares issuable assuming full
dilution.
</TABLE>
# CE2004084EN.01032202.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/322 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/322

---

(2004/C 84 E/0371)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0162/04

by Christopher Heaton-Harris (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(29 January 2004)

Subject:   Commission's accounting systems

Subject:

I understand the Internal Audit Service, in a report entitled ‘IAS Review of the Commission's Accounting Framework — Final Report’ dated 15 April 2003, made a number of recommendations to the Commission regarding the accounting systems.

Can the Commission verify that that the substantive quality assurance of its financial reporting practices has been improved? How has this improvement been implemented in the DGs?

---