alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,311
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,659
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,995
<INVENTORY>                                     13,196
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,419
<PP&E>                                          20,694
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,657
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,635
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,013
<BONDS>                                            352
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           127
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,796
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,635
<SALES>                                         73,977
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,977
<CGS>                                           32,057
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,057
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,863
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,207
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  73
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,091
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,010
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,081
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,081
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .63


</TABLE>
Introductions

Approval of agenda Confirm previous decisions: **Restrooms**
 60” turning circle  Allow side approach to toilet  Use Acela as model  Power door, controls 12” minimum from inside corner  For discussion: grab bars, toilet seat height, lav controls, etc. **Single –** **level dining car:**
 Table space for two wheelchairs, transfer seats for two (storage?)  Table top 34” max  29” min under table, extending 17” min back fro m seating position edge  32” min width **Sleeping compartment:**
 Side transfer to toilet , shower chair  60” turning circle in sleeping area with bed deployed  Controls for all lights, HVAC, call button, etc., within reach ranges (allow duplicate controls)  Positive door latch, openable from outside by train personnel  Use VIA design as model  Bed at wheelchair seat height (18”?)  Table usable by wheelchair user: 34” max top height; 29” min under clearance to 17” from approach edge; 32” min width under approach edge **Lounge:**
 Table space for 2, same as dining car  Accessible restroom  Discuss: Self- serve area meets ABA/ADA Guidelines for cafeteria? What did I miss? New Issues
Attachment
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                          19,428
<SECURITIES>                                    96,195
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,510
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,252
<INVENTORY>                                     41,689
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,316
<PP&E>                                          10,825
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,642)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 236,236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,757
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            88
<OTHER-SE>                                     189,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   236,236
<SALES>                                        165,471
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               165,471
<CGS>                                           94,709
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,458
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   146
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,784
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 427
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,304
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,474
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,012
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,585
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.88
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0417. TAMARA NOLAN v. MARQUEZ BURDETTE SR.

Tamara Nolan filed this application for discretionary appeal from the trial

court’s order concerning, among other issues, custody of her minor child and findings

of contempt arising from visitation issues. Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (11), direct

appeals are permitted from“[a]ll judgments or ordersin child custody cases awarding,

refusing to change, or modifying child custody or holding or declining to hold

persons in contempt of such child custody judgments or orders.” And “[v]isitation is

considered a custody issue.” Daniels v. Barnes, 289 Ga. App. 897, 899 n. 1 (658

SE2d 472) (2008); see also OCGA § 19-9-41 (4) (defining “child custody

proceeding” as “a proceeding in which legal custody, physical custody, or visitation

with respect to a child is in issue.”). Thus, the order that Nolan seeks to appeal is

directly appealable. The fact that Nolan wishesto challenge other portions of the trial

court’s order does not alter this conclusion. See Collins v. Davis, 318 Ga. App. 265,

266-269 (1) (733 SE2d 798) (2012) (if trial court’s order falls within scope of OCGA

§ 5-6-34 (a) (11), then a direct appeal is authorized regardless of the issue raised on

appeal).

We will grant a timely discretionary application if the lower court’s order is

subject to direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Accordingly, this application is

hereby GRANTED. Nolan shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a

notice of appeal with the trial court. If, however, she has already filed a notice of

appeal, she need not file a second notice. The clerk of the trial court is DIRECTED

to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

June 03, 2015
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

06/03/2015
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PRQGR

'lAy 1 8 ZDIll

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT:

FROM:

TO:

Review of Typhula phacorrhiza the active ingredient in the endMproduct Nivalis

for control ofsnow mold in turfgrass om Agrium Advanced Te ologies.

John L. Kough, Ph.D., Biologist B. . Microbial Pesticides Branch, B' pes icides and

Pollution Prevention Division 7511 )

Denise Greenway

Regulatory Action Leader

Microbial Pesticides Branch, Biopesticides and

Pollution Prevention Division (7StlP)

ACTION REQUESTED: To review the product identity and toxicology data 10 support the

registration ofthe new active ingredient Typhula phacorrhiza TP 94671 found in Nivalis and

Nivalis technical.

CONCLUSION: Information required to complete a database to support the registration of the

Typhula phacorrhiza TP 94671 product for its intended turf uses is indicated in the

recommendations below. The data and infonnation currently provided support a finding of no

unreasonable adverse effects to man from the use of this product.

DATA REVIEW RECORD

Active Ingredient: Typhulaphacorrhiza strain TP9467I

Product Name: Nivalis & Nivalis technical

Company Name: Agrium Advanced Technologies RP Inc.

ID No: 84888

Decision Number: 416924, 416925

Submission Number: 853615,853617,863107,867742

DP Barcode: 370310,370309,372057,374615

MRIDNo: 478021-01 thru 07 and 479221-01.
*Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
*Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
This acute intraperitoneal injection toxicity study is acceptable for the purposes of conducting a

pilot study. This study does not satisfy the guideline requirement for an injection toxicity and

pathogenicity study (OPPTS 885.3200; PMRA DATA CODE M4.3.3; OECD 1IN15.5) in the rat.

CLASSIFICATION: ACCEPTABLE as a pilot sludy.

478021-07: Waiver Request for Acute Pulmonary Toxicity/ Infectivity study and Acute Injection

Toxicity/Infectivity study- Due to difficulties in producing adequate quantities of pure mycelium in

liquid culture to perform full acute pulmonary toxicity/infectivity and acute injection

toxicity/pathogenicity testing, the applicant submitted waiver rationales based on the active

ingredient's limited sporulation, optimal growth temperature and lack of relationship to human or

animal pathogens. Results of acute oral toxicity testing and a pilot IP toxicity, infectivity and

pathogenicity study were also used to SUPPOTt the waiver rationale. The information provided is

sufficient to justify waivers for Acute Injection Toxicity/Pathogenicity and Acute Pulmonary

ToxicitylPathogenicity testing for Nivalis TechnicaJ.

4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 26, 1998 PREPARED BY
ERNST & YOUNG, LLP.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1998
<CASH>                                         277,726
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,497,941
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,836,927
<INVENTORY>                                 12,026,658
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,453,525
<PP&E>                                      34,505,498
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,063,844
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             116,887,826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,432,581
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                (40,869,765)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               116,887,826
<SALES>                                    124,786,461
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           124,786,461
<CGS>                                       89,446,442
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               89,446,442
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,079,760
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,436,596
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,794,478
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,974,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,820,478
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,084,401
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 36 (Tuesday, February 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 9736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03636]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and AIDS 
Initial Review Group; Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Research 
Review Committee.
    Date: March 18-19, 2015.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review grant applications.
    Place: St. Gregory Luxury Hotel & Suites, 2033 M St. Northwest, 
Washington, DC 20036.
    Contact Person: Vasundhara Varthakavi, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer Scientific Review Program NIH/NIAID/DEA/ARRB, 5601 Fishers 
Lane MSC 9823, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-669-5020, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aadccbd8dec2cbc1cbdcc3dceac4c3cbc3ce84c4c3c284cdc5dc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ccbaadbeb8a4ada7adbaa5ba8ca2a5ada5a8e2a2a5a4e2aba3ba">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 18, 2015.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-03636 Filed 2-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Michael J. McCann, Chief Financial Officer of PHI, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company for the period covered by suchReport.Date: October 25, 2007         By:  /s/ Michael J. McCann    Michael J. McCann                Chief Financial Officer   
E-4
National Reconnaissance Office Release

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release #03-15

Contact: (703) 808-5050 October 8, 2015

NROL-55 Lifts Off on October 8, 2015 with Auxiliary Payload

A National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) payload was launched successfully 

aboard a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket from Space Launch Complex-3E, 

Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, at 5:49 a.m. PDT, on October 8, 2015.

NROL-55 also carried to orbit an auxiliary payload of 13 CubeSat mini-satellites 

sponsored by the NRO and NASA in a mission known as GRACE, or 

Government Rideshare Advanced Concepts Experiment. This was the third 

CubeSat mission for which the NRO has provided rideshare.

“I commend everyone who made this launch successful. This launch adds 

another powerful mechanism to the nation’s security toolkit. It also demonstrates 

the efficiencies of CubeSat rideshare on an NRO mission. This mission is a great 

example of how NRO, NASA, the Air Force, and our academic colleagues 

collaborate to amplify innovative technology to support the nation,” said Colonel 

Clint Hunt, USAF, Director, NRO Office of Space Launch.

The next NRO launch is on schedule for early 2016, also from Vandenberg.

-NROThe NRO is a joint Department of Defense–Intelligence Community organization responsible for 

developing, launching, and operating America’s intelligence satellites to meet the national 

security needs of our nation.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROBERT TITUS, an individual, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. STANLEY HORRELL, an individual; JIM MUNYON, an individual; FRANK PRIMOZIC, an individual; PAM WOODWORTH, an individual; TIM COE, an individual; ROGER MCKINLEY, an individual; BILL HARRINGTON, an individual, Defendants - Appellants, and CITY OF PRAIRIE CITY, a municipal corporation; DIANE CLINGMAN, an individual; ANNA BASS, an individual, Defendants. No. 11-35664 D.C. No. 2:08-cv-01330-SU
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Patricia Sullivan, Magistrate Judge, Presiding 

# FILED
OCT 22 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 Argued and Submitted October 10, 2012 Portland, Oregon Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Stanley Horrell and other members of the Prairie City Council appeal from the district court’s denial of summary judgment in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action brought by Robert Titus. Because Titus ha d no protected property interest in his continued employment, he suffered no due process violation, and appellants are entitled to qualified immunity. We reverse. Titus was an at will employee under the terms of the City Charter. The Charter states that the City Council may appoint “such other officers and employees of the city as the Council deems necessary or advisable and may remove any of them at any time within th eir discretion.” Titus offers no evidence to prove that he was not appointed by th e City Council, and he does not dispute that he was employed by the city. T hough Titus argued that the Charter does not apply to his position because it is not a specifically listed “officer” position, Titus was at least an “other . . . employee[]” whom the City Council could remove without limitation. Since Titus had no entitlement to his continued employment, he had no protected property interest, and his due process rights were not violated. See Lawson v. Umatilla Cnty. , 139 F.3d 690, 691-92 (9th Cir. 1998). Appellants3 are entitled to summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity because they did not violate Titus’s due process rights. See Pearson v. Callahan , 555 U.S. 223, 232, 236 (2009). REVERSED and REMANDED.
-NRO APPROVED FOR 

'RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

Tor SECRET 

WiNEM 

Policy: MOLPIPMEIR 

Security: Policy 

STIC: MOL 

ceet$sicS, e 

Dr. Edward C. Welsh 

Executive Office of the President 

National Aeronautics and Space Council 

Washington, D. C. 20502 

Dear Ed: 

Your letter of August 26, 1965, addressed to Al Hall before he left. 

the Government service, suggests a briefing on MOL to members 

of the Armed Services and Space Committees. 

The manner in which information on the MOL program should be r 

leased was a major point of consideration in relation to the decied 

to proceed. The August 24, 1965, Memorandum to the President 

from Mr. McNamara recommends that Mar, be operatedvithin th 

guidelines of existing security policy on military space programs 

The relationship of the policy to MOL was detailed in the "Policy o 

Public Information Aspects and International Reactions to the 

Orbiting Laboratory, " a copy of which is intaosed. 

Protection of security 'in a "Secret" level briefing would have som 

serious problems.-A frank diecussion-of the principal objectives 

of the program could not be given and the Aulavoidable evasions i ii 

cause antagonism in, the absence of a plausfole exp/anation. 

The list of individuals now briefed an 1.401., includes several "keys 

Senators and Representativev. To some extent, the need for proFidin 

information in Congressional channela is thereby fulfilled. We 

be able to handle any difficult situations by working through theie 

cleared individuals. I would prefer not to volunteer any briefingiia,, 

the present. As the program proceeds: the-means of passing on more 

information can be worked out. 

Sincerely yours, 

1 I r. 7 -ii 

HANDLE YR TALENT. 

KEYHOLE CHANNELS 

ONLY 

Harold Brown TCS-250988/65 

C LB attleinjw 77071 3E144 

. gr,W.2,— , 

9/8/65 Space seine 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

FI.ELEASE JULY 2015 

Coverin4 Brief 

Director of Defense Research and Engineering 

From: Deputy Director (Strategic and Space Systems) 

Problem: To advise Dr. Welsh against providing a classified MOL: 

briefing for representatives from the Armed Services and Space 

Committees. 

Discussion: Dr. Welsh*s letter (Tab A) makes •such a proposal. 

We do not believe we could protect security in a "Secret" briefin 

since we could not invoke normal military security'. Tab B is 

a reply explaining our position. A copy of the 1,101, Policy on 

Public Information is also"for waided. 

Recommendation: That you sign Tab B. 

ifiligRE VIA TALEUTCHANIELS 

ONLY 

I
' .J -- \l 

USCIB: 5.2/80 

TSP SI!iSHii' 

'rOP SECRET 

REF ID:A67879 

APPENDED DOOUMENTS CONTAIN 

CODEWORD MATERIAL 

9 February 1955 

MEMQRANDPM FOR THE MEMBERS QF USCIB:' 

Subject: Approval of the Minutes of the lllth Meeting of USCIB. 

Reference: USCIB 5.2/78 of 25 Jantiary 1955. 

l. Subject to the insertion of the attached corrected pages in. 

their appropriate places, the minutes o? the lllth meeting or USCIB 

are approved. 

2. It is requested that the word TENTATIVE be deleted from the 

initial page or the minutes for each item considered and the word 

FINAL substituted therefor. 

Enclosures 

l. Corrected page 7 of subject minutes. 

2. Corrected page 11 of subject minutes. 

3. Correction Sheet. ,,,,.---

~ 

~ 

// g.d/. s-~ 

USCIB: 5.2/80 

APPENDED DOOUMENTS CONTAIN 

CODEWORD MATERIAL 

24 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-30-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352\3 

T'OP SECRET 
P,ge. P§ragraph 

of FiijeJ. Q9PY 

Para 1 

Para 2 

Para 3 

Para 2 

ONE HlJNDREI) ELEVENTH MEETING 

QF THE 

Y1fITED STATF§ ®MMQNIQATIOI§ IN'TELL!QENCE BOARP 

TENTATIVE: 

FINAL: 

FINAL: 

FINAL: 

TENTATIVE: 

CQRRECTION SHEET 

TEXT (Tentative and FINAL) 

"MR. GODEL indicated that a recommendation from 

USCIB to the ~ecretary of Defense ~n this point 

would be acted upon favorably•" . 

"MR. GODEL indicated that a recommendation from' 

tBCIB to the Secretary of Defense on this point 

would undoubtedly be acted upon favorably.u 

After "channels," delete the rest of the 

sentence. 

Chan~e "3i" to 11 2t11 • 

"In response to questions •••••••••••• that 

{1) we do not have a special interst in 

I I······" 

"In response to auestions •••••••••••• that 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605