Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 174 / Tuesday, September 9, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 53299 

4. Collection of Information 

This rule will not call for a new 

collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

5. Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on the States, on the relationship 

between the national government and 

the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. We have 

analyzed this rule under that Order and 

determined that this rule does not have 

implications for federalism. 

6. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to contact the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places or vessels. 

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this rule 

will not result in such an expenditure, 

we do discuss the effects of this rule 

elsewhere in this preamble. 

8. Taking of Private Property 

This rule will not cause a taking of 

private property or otherwise have 

taking implications under Executive 

Order 12630, Governmental Actions and 

Interference with Constitutionally 

Protected Property Rights. 

9. Civil Justice Reform 

This rule meets applicable standards 

in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive 

Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to 

minimize litigation, eliminate 

ambiguity, and reduce burden. 

10. Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Executive Order 13045, Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not 

an economically significant rule and 

does not create an environmental risk to 

health or risk to safety that may 

disproportionately affect children. 

11. Indian Tribal Governments 

This rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

12. Energy Effects 

This action is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under Executive Order 

13211, Actions Concerning Regulations 

That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. 

13. Technical Standards 

This rule does not use technical 

standards. Therefore, we did not 

consider the use of voluntary consensus 

standards. 

14. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Management Directive 023–01 and 

Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 

which guide the Coast Guard in 

complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have determined that this action is one 

of a category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule involves the 

establishment of a temporary safety 

zone. This rule is categorically excluded 

from further review under paragraph 

34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant 

Instruction. An environmental analysis 

checklist supporting this determination 

and a Categorical Exclusion 

Determination are available in the 

docket where indicated under 

ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or 

information that may lead to the 

discovery of a significant environmental 

impact from this rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and record keeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR Part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L. 

107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of 

Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1 

■ 2. Add § 165.T13–280 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T13–280 Safety Zone; Vigor 

Industrial Ferry Construction, West 

Duwamish Waterway, Seattle, WA. 

(a) Location. The following area is a 

safety zone: All waters of the West 

Duwamish Waterway in Seattle, WA 

encompassed within the area created by 

connecting the following points: 

47°35′04′′ N, 122°21′30′′ W thence 

westerly to 47°35′04′′ N, 122°21′50′′ W 

thence northerly to 47°35′19′′ N, 

122°21′50′′ W thence easterly to 

47°35′19′′ N, 122°21′30′′ W thence 

southerly to 47°35′04′′ N, 122°21′30′′ W. 

(b) Regulations. In accordance with 

the general regulations in 33 CFR Part 

165, Subpart C, no person may enter or 

remain in the safety zone created in this 

rule unless authorized by the Captain of 

the Port or a Designated Representative. 

See 33 CFR Part 165, Subpart C, for 

additional information and 

requirements. Vessel operators wishing 

to enter the zone during the 

enforcement period must request 

permission for entry by contacting the 

Joint Harbor Operation Center at 206– 

217–6001 or the Vessel Traffic Service 

Puget Sound on VHF channel 14. 

(c) Enforcement period. The safety 

zone created in this rule is enforced 

from 11:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. on 

September 17, 2014, and from noon 

until 6:30 p.m. on September 18, 2014 

unless cancelled sooner by the Captain 

of the Port. 

Dated: August 26, 2014. 

M.W. Raymond, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port, Puget Sound. 

[FR Doc. 2014–21387 Filed 9–8–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R06–OAR–2012–0096; FRL–9916–32– 

Region 6] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Texas; Revision 

to Control Volatile Organic Compound 

Emissions from Storage Tanks 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
53300 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 174 / Tuesday, September 9, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is approving a Texas State 

Implementation (SIP) revision for 

control of volatile organic compound 

(VOC) emissions from storage tanks. The 

revision implements additional controls 

in the Dallas-Fort Worth 1997 ozone 

nonattainment area (DFW area); 

modifies control requirements in the 

DFW area, the Houston-GalvestonBrazoria ozone nonattainment area 

(HGB area), the Beaumont-Port Arthur 

area (BPA area) and El Paso, Gregg, 

Nueces and Victoria Counties; and 

makes non-substantive changes to VOC 

control provisions that apply in 

Aransas, Bexar, Calhoun, Matagorda, 

San Patricio and Travis Counties. In 

addition, EPA finds that the SIP revision 

implements serious area reasonable 

available control technology (RACT) 

controls for the VOC storage source 

category in the DFW area and continues 

to implement severe area RACT for this 

source category in the HGB area as 

required by the Clean Air Act (CAA). 

DATES: This rule is effective on 

November 10, 2014 without further 

notice, unless EPA receives relevant 

adverse comment by October 9, 2014. If 

EPA receives such comment, EPA will 

publish a timely withdrawal in the 

Federal Register informing the public 

that this rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket No. EPA–R06– 

OAR–2012–0096, by one of the 

following methods: 

• www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

online instructions. 

• Email: Mr. Carl Young at 

young.carl@epa.gov. 

• Mail or delivery: Mr. Guy 

Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning Section 

(6PD–L), Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, 

Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket No. EPA–R06–OAR–2012–0096. 

EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: The index to the docket for 

this action is available electronically at 

www.regulations.gov and in hard copy 

at EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, 

Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all 

documents in the docket are listed in 

the index, some information may be 

publicly available only at the hard copy 

location (e.g., copyrighted material), and 

some may not be publicly available at 

either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the 

hard copy materials, please schedule an 

appointment with the person listed in 

the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

paragraph below or Mr. Bill Deese at 

214–665–7253. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl 

Young, (214) 665–6645, young.carl@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document wherever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

the EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Background 

II. EPA’s Evaluation 

III. Final Action 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Background 

A. CAA and SIPs 

Section 110 of the CAA requires states 

to develop and submit to EPA a SIP to 

ensure that state air quality meets 

National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards. These ambient standards 

currently address six criteria pollutants: 

carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, 

ozone, lead, particulate matter, and 

sulfur dioxide. Each federally-approved 

SIP protects air quality primarily by 

addressing air pollution at its point of 

origin through air pollution regulations 

and control strategies. EPA approved 

SIP regulations and control strategies 

are federally enforceable. As needed, 

States revise the SIP as needed and 

submit revisions to EPA for approval. 

B. SIP Revision Submitted on January 

17, 2012 

A SIP revision for controlling VOC 

emissions from storage tanks was 

adopted by Texas on December 7, 2011, 

and submitted to us on January 17, 

2012. VOCs are an ‘‘ozone precursor’’, 

as they react with oxygen, nitrogen 

oxides (NOX) and sunlight to form 

ozone. Controlling sources of VOC and 

NOX emissions can lower ozone levels 

in the ambient air. 

The revision amends Title 30, Chapter 

115 of the Texas Administrative Code 

(30 TAC 115) to (1) revise §§ 115.110, 

115.112–115.117, and 115.119, and (2) 

add new §§ 115.111 and 115.118. The 

revision (1) implements additional VOC 

controls for storage tanks in the DFW 

area; (2) modifies VOC control 

requirements in the DFW area, the HGB 

area, the BPA area and El Paso, Gregg, 

Nueces and Victoria Counties and (3) 

makes non-substantive changes to VOC 

control provisions that apply in 

Aransas, Bexar, Calhoun, Matagorda, 

San Patricio and Travis Counties. 

The DFW area consists of Collin, 

Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Johnson, Kaufman, 

Parker, Rockwall and Tarrant Counties. 

The DFW area was reclassified as 

serious ozone nonattainment for the 

1997 ozone standard (75 FR 79302, 

December 20, 2010). The SIP revision 

for storage tanks was adopted by Texas 

to meet the CAA RACT requirements for 

the VOC storage emission source 

category in serious ozone nonattainment 

areas. In the DFW area the revision (1) 

requires control of VOC flash emissions 

from storage tanks in the DFW area that 

might otherwise emit 50 tons per year 

(tpy) of VOC or more, (2) adds 

requirements for low-leaking storage 

tank fittings and (3) limits situations 

when a floating roof storage tank is 

allowed to emit VOCs because the roof 

is not floating on the stored VOC liquid. 

The revision also adds a requirement 

for the DFW and HGB areas that a vapor 

recovery unit used for VOC control must 

be designed to process all VOC vapor 

generated by the maximum crude oil 

and condensate throughput of the 

storage tank and must transfer recovered 

vapors to a pipe or container that is 

vapor-tight. The HGB area consists of 

Brazoria, Chambers, Fort Bend, 

Galveston, Harris, Liberty, Montgomery 

and Waller counties. The HGB area is 

classified as a severe ozone 

nonattainment area for the 1997 ozone 

NAAQS (73 FR 56983, October 1, 2008). 

In the DFW, HGB and BPA areas and 

in El Paso, Gregg, Nueces and Victoria 

Counties the revision (1) adds an 

explicit requirement that any flare used 

for control must be designed and 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 174 / Tuesday, September 9, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 53301 

operated according to 40 CFR 60.18(b)— 

(f) as amended through December 22, 

2008, and (2) amends monitoring and 

testing requirements that ensure 

effectiveness of VOC controls. The BPA 

area consists of Hardin, Jefferson, and 

Orange Counties. 

VOC control requirements for storage 

tanks also apply in Aransas, Bexar, 

Calhoun, Matagorda, San Patricio, and 

Travis Counties. The revision did not 

substantially change requirements for 

these counties. 

The SIP revision submitted by Texas 

may be accessed online at 

www.regulations.gov, Docket No. EPA– 

R06–OAR–2012–0096. 

C. CAA Requirements for the SIP 

Revision 

The primary CAA requirements 

pertaining to the SIP revision submitted 

by Texas are found in CAA sections 

110(l) and 182(b)(2). CAA section 110(l) 

requires that a SIP revision submitted to 

EPA be adopted after reasonable notice 

and public hearing. Section 110(l) also 

requires that we not approve a SIP 

revision if the revision would interfere 

with any applicable requirement 

concerning attainment and reasonable 

further progress, or any other applicable 

requirement of the CAA. CAA section 

182(b)(2) requires that ozone 

nonattainment areas classified as 

moderate or above implement RACT 

controls on all major VOC and NOX

emission sources and on all sources and 

source categories covered by a control 

technique guideline (CTG) issued by us. 

RACT is defined as the lowest emissions 

limitation that a particular source is 

capable of meeting by the application of 

control technology that is reasonably 

available considering technological and 

economic feasibility (44 FR 53762, 

September 17, 1979). The CTG and 

Alternative Control Technique (ACT) 

documents that we issue provide states 

with guidance concerning what types of 

controls could constitute RACT for a 

given source category. The documents 

we have issued pertaining to storage 

tanks are (1) Control of Volatile Organic 

Emissions from Storage of Petroleum 

Liquids in Fixed-Roof Tanks (EPA–450/ 

2–77–036, December 1977), (2) Control 

of Volatile Organic Emissions from 

Petroleum Liquid Storage in External 

Floating Roof Tanks (EPA–450/2–78– 

047, December 1978) and (3) Alternative 

Control Techniques Document—Volatile 

Organic Liquid Storage In Floating and 

Fixed Roof Tanks (EPA–453/R–94–001, 

January 1994). These documents are 

accessible online at www.epa.gov/

airquality/ozonepollution/SIPToolkit/

ctgs.html. Because the DFW area was 

classified as a serious ozone 

nonattainment area, a major source is a 

source having the potential to emit 50 

tpy of VOC or more (CAA 182(c)). 

Because the HGB area is classified as a 

severe ozone nonattainment area, a 

major source is a source having the 

potential to emit 25 tpy of VOC or more 

(CAA 182(d)). 

II. EPA’s Evaluation 

VOC flash emissions occur during 

transfer of the VOCs from a higher 

pressure storage tank to a lower pressure 

tank, reservoir, or other container. 

Floating roof landing loss emissions 

occur when the liquid level in a floating 

roof tank is lowered and the roof rests 

(lands) on the legs, or supports, rather 

than on the liquid, severely limiting the 

VOC control efficiency of the floating 

roof. The storage tank requirements, to 

control flash emissions, use low-leaking 

tank fittings and further limit emissions 

from floating roof storage tanks were 

previously implemented in the HGB 

area and approved by us as RACT (75 

FR 15348, March 29, 2010). For the 

DFW area, we previously found that 

Texas rules for storage tanks met RACT 

requirements (64 FR 3841, January 26, 

1999 and 74 FR 1903, January 14, 2009). 

The RACT rules must address major 

sources that have the potential to emit 

50 tpy of VOC or more in the DFW area 

(serious area requirement) and 25 tpy of 

VOC or more in the HGB area (severe 

area requirement). 

Our evaluation found that the revision 

to the Texas SIP (1) improves the rules 

that were previously approved, (2) 

results in additional VOC reductions in 

the DFW area and (3) ensures that RACT 

is met for storage tanks with flash 

emissions in the DFW area and 

continues to be met in the HGB area. 

Additionally we found that (1) Texas 

adopted after reasonable notice and 

public hearing and (2) approval would 

not interfere with any applicable 

requirement concerning attainment and 

reasonable further progress or any other 

applicable requirement of the CAA. A 

technical support document (TSD) was 

prepared which details our evaluation. 

Our TSD may be accessed online at 

www.regulations.gov, Docket No. EPA– 

R06–OAR–2012–0096. 

III. Final Action 

We are approving a Texas SIP revision 

for control of VOC emissions from 

storage tanks adopted on December 7, 

2011, and submitted on January 17, 

2012. The revision (1) revises 30 TAC 

§§ 115.110, 115.112–115.117, and 

115.119 and (2) adds new 30 TAC 

§§ 115.111 and 115.118. The revision (1) 

implements additional VOC controls for 

storage tanks in the DFW area; (2) 

modifies VOC control requirements in 

the DFW area, the BPA area, the HGB 

area and the counties of El Paso, Gregg, 

Nueces and Victoria and (3) makes nonsubstantive changes to VOC control 

provisions that apply in Aransas, Bexar, 

Calhoun, Matagorda, San Patricio and 

Travis Counties. In addition, we find 

that this revision implements serious 

area RACT controls for the VOC storage 

source category in the DFW area for the 

1997 ozone NAAQS and continues to 

implement severe area RACT controls 

for this source category in the HGB area. 

We are publishing this rule without 

prior proposal because we view this as 

a non-controversial amendment and 

anticipate no adverse comments. 

However, in the proposed rules section 

of this Federal Register publication, we 

are publishing a separate document that 

will serve as the proposal to approve the 

SIP revision if relevant adverse 

comments are received. This rule will 

be effective on November 10, 2014 

without further notice unless we receive 

relevant adverse comment by October 9, 

2014. If we receive relevant adverse 

comments, we will publish a timely 

withdrawal in the Federal Register 

informing the public that the rule will 

not take effect. We will address all 

public comments in a subsequent final 

rule based on the proposed rule. We 

will not institute a second comment 

period on this action. Any parties 

interested in commenting must do so 

now. Please note that if we receive 

relevant adverse comment on an 

amendment, paragraph, or section of 

this rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

we may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
53302 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 174 / Tuesday, September 9, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this rule and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by November 10, 2014. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this rule for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Ozone, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: August 22, 2014. 

Samuel Coleman, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart SS—Texas 

■ 2. In § 52.2270 (c), the table titled 

‘‘EPA Approved Regulations in the 

Texas SIP’’ is amended by revising the 

entries for sections 115.110, 115.112 

through 115.117, and 115.119 and 

adding in sequential order new entries 

for sections 115.111 and 115.118. 

The amendments read as follows: 

§ 52.2270 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

EPA APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE TEXAS SIP 

State citation Title/subject 

State 

approval/ 

submittal date 

EPA approval date Explanation 

*******

Chapter 115 (Reg 5)—Control of Air Pollution from Volatile Organic Compounds 

*******

Subchapter B—General Volatile Organic Compound Sources 

Division 1: Storage of Organic Compounds 

Section 115.110 ........ Applicability and Definitions ....... 12/1/2011 9/9/2014 [Insert FEDERAL REGISTER citation].

Section 115.111 ........ Exemptions ................................. 12/1/2011 9/9/2014 [Insert FEDERAL REGISTER citation].

Section 115.112 ........ Control Requirements ................ 12/1/2011 9/9/2014 [Insert FEDERAL REGISTER citation].

Section 115.113 ........ Alternate Control Requirements 12/1/2011 9/9/2014 [Insert FEDERAL REGISTER citation].

Section 115.114 ........ Inspection Requirements ........... 12/1/2011 9/9/2014 [Insert FEDERAL REGISTER citation].

Section 115.115 ........ Monitoring Requirements ........... 12/1/2011 9/9/2014 [Insert FEDERAL REGISTER citation].

Section 115.116 ........ Testing Requirements ................ 12/1/2011 9/9/2014 [Insert FEDERAL REGISTER citation].


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 174 / Tuesday, September 9, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 53303 

EPA APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE TEXAS SIP—Continued 

State citation Title/subject 

State 

approval/ 

submittal date 

EPA approval date Explanation 

Section 115.117 ........ Approved Test Methods ............. 12/1/2011 9/9/2014 [Insert FEDERAL REGISTER citation].

Section 115.118 ........ Recordkeeping Requirements .... 12/1/2011 9/9/2014 [Insert FEDERAL REGISTER citation].

Section 115.119 ........ Compliance Schedules .............. 12/1/2011 9/9/2014 [Insert FEDERAL REGISTER citation].

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2014–21306 Filed 9–8–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 64 

[CG Docket Nos. 13–24 and 03–123; FCC 

13–118] 

Misuse of Internet Protocol (IP) 

Captioned Telephone Service; 

Correction 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Technical amendments. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission (Commission) published in 

the Federal Register on August 28, 

2014, 79 FR 51450, amending its rules 

for Internet Protocol Captioned 

Telephone Service (IP CTS). That 

document inadvertently removed 

§ 64.604(c)(11)(iv) of the Commission’s 

rules. This document corrects the final 

regulations by adding back that section. 

DATES: Effective September 9, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eliot 

Greenwald, Disability Rights Office, 

Consumer and Governmental Affairs 

Bureau, at (202) 418–2235 (voice), or 

email Eliot.Greenwald@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission published a document in 

the Federal Register on August 30, 

2013, 78 FR 53684, adding 

§ 64.604(c)(11)(iv) of its rules for IP CTS. 

In FR Doc. 2014–20433, published in 

the Federal Register on August 28, 

2014, 79 FR 51450, § 64.604(c)(11)(iv) 

was inadvertently removed. This 

correction reverses that removal and 

adds § 64.604(c)(11)(iv) as published on 

August 30, 2013, 78 FR 53684. 

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 64 

Individuals with disabilities, 

Telecommunications. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary. 

Accordingly, 47 CFR part 64 is 

corrected by making the following 

technical amendment: 

PART 64—MISCELLANEOUS RULES 

RELATING TO COMMON CARRIERS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 64 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 254(k); 

403(b)(2)(B), (c), Pub. L. 104–104, 110 Stat. 

56. Interpret or apply 47 U.S.C. 201, 218, 222, 

225, 226, 227, 228, 254(k), 616, 620, and the 

Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act 

of 2012, Pub. L. 112–96, unless otherwise 

noted. 

■ 2. Amend § 64.604 by adding 

paragraph (c)(11)(iv) to read as follows: 

§ 64.604 Mandatory minimum standards. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(11) * * * 

(iv) IP CTS providers shall maintain, 

with each consumer’s registration 

records, records describing any IP CTS 

equipment provided, directly or 

indirectly, to such consumer, stating the 

amount paid for such equipment, and 

stating whether the label required by 

paragraph (c)(11)(iii) of this section was 

affixed to such equipment prior to its 

provision to the consumer. For 

consumers to whom IP CTS equipment 

was provided directly or indirectly prior 

to the effective date of this paragraph 

(c)(11), such records shall state whether 

and when the label required by 

paragraph (c)(11)(iii) of this section was 

distributed to such consumer. Such 

records shall be maintained for a 

minimum period of five years after the 

consumer ceases to obtain service from 

the provider. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2014–21053 Filed 9–8–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

50 CFR Part 17 

[Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2013–0103; 

4500030113] 

RIN 1018–AZ10 

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 

and Plants; Endangered Species 

Status for Agave eggersiana and 

Gonocalyx concolor, and Threatened 

Species Status for Varronia rupicola 

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service (Service), determine 

endangered species status under the 

Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 

amended (Act), for Agave eggersiana (no 

common name) and Gonocalyx concolor 

(no common name), and threatened 

species status for Varronia rupicola (no 

common name). These three plants are 

endemic to the Caribbean. The effect of 

this regulation will be to add these 

species to the List of Endangered and 

Threatened Plants. 

DATES: This rule is effective October 9, 

2014. 

ADDRESSES: This final rule is available 

on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov and http://

www.fws.gov/caribbean/es. Comments 

and materials we received, as well as 

supporting documentation we used in 

preparing this rule, are available for 

public inspection at http://

www.regulations.gov. All of the 

comments, materials, and 

documentation that we considered in 

this rulemaking are available by 

appointment, during normal business 

hours at: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Caribbean Ecological Services Field 

Office, P.O. Box 491, Road 301 Km. 5.1, 

Boquero ́n, PR 00622; telephone 787– 

851–7297. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES