alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.2  Consent of Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.  I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of North American Palladium Ltd., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of references to our name and references to our involvement in the preparation of technical information relating to the Lac des Iles mine (including the Offset Zone), Ontario, and the Vezza Project, Quebec, included in the 2011 Annual Information Form of North American Palladium Ltd., dated March 30, 2012 (the AIF).  I also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-13766) and in the Registration Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-164512) of the references to my name and the above-mentioned information in the AIF.   Dated this 30 day of March, 2012.Name:
/s/Deborah A. McCombeDeborah A. McCombeon behalf of Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.   (formerly Scott Wilson Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.)
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement 
of Cabletron Systems, Inc. ("Cabletron") on Form S-8 (as filed on September 15, 
1998) of our report, which includes an explanatory paragraph, dated February 19,
1998, on  our audit of the Statement of Assets Sold and Statement of Revenue and
Direct Operating Expenses (the "Statements") of the Network Products Business of
Digital Equipment Corporation (the "Business"), which report is included in the 
report on Form 8-K/A. The explanatory paragraph states that the Statements were 
prepared to present the assets sold by the Business to Cabletron and the revenue
and direct operating expenses of the Business and are not intended to be a 
complete presentation of the Business' financial position or results of 
operations.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
September 15, 1998
M~ M>,..~414 I Vi JL\;nCI 1 e 

USCIB: 4.2/45 

3 May 1955 

'iOP 6Ei6Riffi'f 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Consolidation of CIBD #7 and CIBD #14. 

USCIB 4.2/43 dated 18 April 1955. 

1. Vote sheet replies from USCIBEC on the reference indicate 

approval by all members with one member noting a minor exception. 

2. The Anny manber expressed misgivings over the restrictive nature 

of a strict interpretation of the first sentence of paragraph 1 of 

Annex B. Consideration of that wording by this office led to the conclusion that it could and should be changed and that the change could be 

made without in any way vitiating the practical intent of the Security 

Committee in its original selection of words. This office therefore 

suggests a change as follows: 

1. It is considered at present that &~~-~e:P&e:as-w&e-fi.a:ve 

any person who has been indoctrinated for Category II or III 

COMINT and J!:ie:ve who has been exposed to the a'l'J.d products of, 

or processing within these categories, w~±± may have ''knowledge 

of current value" and sae~a-ee-eee~gaee becomes a candidate 

for assignment to at least Groups B and C respectively. 

3. The Army member also suggested the addition (to Annex A paragraph 2) of the Offshore Islands of Formosa as areas of undue risk. 

4. On the assumption that the above emendations will be acceptable 

to the remaining USCIBEC members the reference as emended above is herewith submitted to USCIB under interregnum procedure. 

5. Absence of objection by any member of USCIB prior to 1700, 

11 May 1955 will be considered to constitute Board approval. If approved, 

page corrections will be issued at that time. 

aptain, • Navy JD~l'ti ve Secretary, USCIB 

USCIB: 4. 2/45 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-10-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

TOP SECRET 

24
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intergraph Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Larry
J. Laster, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                     By:    /s/ Larry J. Laster
                            ------------------------------------------
                     Name:  Larry J. Laster
                     Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                     Date:  November 8, 2004

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Intergraph Corporation and will be retained by Intergraph
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.]
--· ... • 

USCIB: 13. 5/79 

'!'OP SEQR.g,[' 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

• 

M'N!INBEiB B00UMi!M!S 00M'ff<IN 

GOBISWE>RB M-A'fERIAL 

10 August 1954 

Subject: Compromise of COMINT Information. 

Reference: USCIB 13.5/55 dated 20 April 1954. 

The encl_osed memorandtnn from the Director, GCHQ, to the . . 

Director, NSA, on the above subject, is forwarded for information. 

Enclosure 

TJGC/4567 dtd 13 J~ 1954 w/l Encl. 

USCIB: 13. 5/79 

TOP SECR:E'F 

APPBNBBB BOO(:JHilffS 00N'fAIN 

GGBEWORB MA!EiUAL 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-18-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352\3 

24 
I 

,.. - ... 

• 

GOVERNMENT COMMUNICA J"IONS HEADQUARTERS, 

OAl<LEY, Cf-IEL TEN HAM, GLOS. 

Toi.: CHEL TCNI IAM 55321 

13th July', 195~. 

[ToP SEcRET [~Re T t·!] 

Director, =-·-·-

••• 

National Security .Agency. 

Reference D00/4217 of 26th 'March. 

I attach a list of three compromises 

of Sigj_nt information v.hich occurred 

on U.K. communications during the 

first quarter of this year. 

• • PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

'f6P SE€RET -.fifcOTt-t 
ilo. Da.te ot 

Canp:romisc 

1 7. 2. 54-. 

2. 17. 3. 54 

3. 30. 3. 5Z... 

REF 

10 IE HANDLED ti ACCCADANCE WITH IRSIG 

G-iI{S) 

GC'~ JIEIH 

Circumstances 

Handing end portion/of 

ro.w J:lD.teria.l message 

sent in clear.· P/1 

te.pe forwarded for 

transnissioD in lieu 

of cr,ypt. 

Classification 

~ Portion of p/l message ftlF smnmf !'Hem 

(Po.lmcr St.) aant manua.lly in olear 

on Rollick circuit 

between Ion.don and Cheltenham.. 

Ogara.tor failed to 

:remember .that circuit 

Wl1S not in cypher 

although 'WU'DilJglights 

indicated this. 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

• 

• 

Subject Jlatter 

ot Ccmpranise 

Codeword not 

involved. 

:,pendi:ic to rm/lf567 •. 

.d.ction (other thD.n 

disciplina.17) ~aken 

to prevont .recurnmoe 

A rather stupid ar.ror 

by an oporo.tor which 

should not rocur. 

:..ipcro.i:ors again reminded 

of' tape iumclling 

p:roccdu:res W.d down 

lbnual. 

in Sigjnt Carr:;uni ~ 

Oger.a.tor re.mimed ot 

circuit procedure • 

(Noto. Ballick has since 

boen .removed :f'rom 1ibis 

c:l.rcuit and 5 UCO 

subsi:ituted). 

TOP SECRET 

• 

··- - --
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2136

ANNELLA A. ROYSTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PATRICIA M. WALL; JOHN D. NETHERLAND; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-98-690-3) Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 27, 1999Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Annella A. Royster, Appellant Pro Se. Guy Winston Horsley, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c)(1) (West Supp. 1999). 2 PER CURIAM: Annella A. Royster seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order* dismissing her civil action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Royster’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The magistrate judge’s order was entered on the docket on July 15, 1999. Royster’s notice of appeal was filed on August 18, 1999. Because Royster failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
DELTA I V

HEAVY

NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

VAND ENB ERG

JANUARY 2011 AUGUST 2013 JANUARY 2019 APRIL 2021 SEPTEMBER 2022

A West Coast Farewell
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 
33-25169, 33-41451, 33-49162, 333-26142 and 333-41583 on Form S-8, and Nos.
33-79158 and 333-03765 on Form S-3 of Summit Technology, Inc. (the "Company") of
our report dated March 17, 1999 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes an explanatory paragraph relating to a change in accounting principle
described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements), appearing in this
Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company dated March 23, 1999.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 23, 1999
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 10, 2019

No. 04-19-00543-CV

Elsa PRADO, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Rolando Prado, Jr., Deceased, 

and as Next Friend of A.P., Minor; Elizabeth Prado; Rolando Prado; and Maria Prado,

Appellants

v.

LONESTAR RESOURCES, INC.; Union Pacific Railroad Company; and Ezra Alderman 

Ranches, Inc.,

Appellees

From the 81st Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-07-00095-CVL

Honorable Susan D. Reed, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellants have filed a response showing they have made payment arrangements with 

Richey Gentry, one of the court reporter’s in this case. We therefore ORDER Richey Gentry to 

file his volumes of the reporter’s record within 30 days of this order. 

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of September, 2019.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle,

Clerk of Court
# CE2004084EN.01008701.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/87 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/87

---

(2004/C 84 E/0100)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3705/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject:   Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Ancona

Subject:

With reference to question E-0961/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of Ancona (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the Altener II programme, the Commission replied to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

1

Can the Commission provide information on any projects submitted since the date of its reply (25 April 2003)?

---

(1)  OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

1

---
```

                                              FIRST M & F CORPORATION

                                                    EXHIBIT 32

                                            SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of First M&F Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Hugh S. Potts, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:

A.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

B.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
         condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:    November 9, 2005

                                                                /s/ Hugh S. Potts, Jr.
                                                              -----------------------------------------------
                                                              Hugh S. Potts, Jr.
                                                              Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of First M&F Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John G. Copeland, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:

A.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

B.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
         condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:    November 9, 2005

                                                                /s/ John G. Copeland
                                                              -----------------------------------------------
                                                              John G. Copeland
                                                              EVP & Chief Financial Officer
```
Wood River Power Station 

Dynegy Midwest Gen 

Stack: 798'MSL I 350' AGL 

.lllUll.lijrJliUIIIIICiass D, SFC-3000' MSL 

, Class E, 3000'-5000' MSL _ _,J:K"",I 

e• Class B, 5000'-8000' MSL 

Within STL Mode C 30NM 

A. 2 Sparta-Hunter (SAR} 

Class E, 700' AGL and above
CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                      OF
                  PAINEWEBBER/GEODYNE INSTITUTIONAL/PENSION
                    ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PARTNERSHIP P-7

       The undersigned  General Partner hereby duly executes this Certificate of
Limited Partnership of PaineWebber/Geodyne  Institutional/Pension  Energy Income
Limited  Partnership  P-7 (the  "Partnership")  which is  being  filed  with the
Secretary of State of Oklahoma in accordance  with the Oklahoma  Revised Uniform
Limited Partnership Act.

       1.    The   name   of   the    Partnership    is    PaineWebber/Geodyne
Institutional/Pension Energy Income Limited Partnership P-7.

       2. The address of the registered  office of the  Partnership is 320 South
Boston  Ave.,  The  Mezzanine,  Tulsa,  Oklahoma  74103,  and  the  name  of the
registered  agent  whose  business  office  address  will  be  the  same  as the
registered office address is Geodyne Properties, Inc.

       3.    The address of the  principal  office of the  Partnership  in the
United States where its  Partnership  records are to be kept or made available
is c/o Geodyne Properties,  Inc., 320 South Boston Ave., The Mezzanine, Tulsa,
Oklahoma 74103-3708.

       4. The name, the mailing address,  and the street address of the business
or residence of each general partner of the Partnership are as follows:


       Name                 Mailing Address              Business Address

Geodyne Properties,      320 South Boston Ave.         320 South Boston Ave.
   Inc.                  The Mezzanine                 The Mezzanine
                         Tulsa, Oklahoma               Tulsa, Oklahoma
                        74103-3708                     74103-3708


<PAGE>



       5.    The latest  date upon which the  Partnership  is to  dissolve  is
February 28, 2012.

       SIGNED on this 28th day of February, 1992.

                                           GENERAL PARTNER:

                                           Geodyne Properties, Inc.
                                           a Delaware corporation



                                           By:  /s/ Michael E. Luttrell
                                                ---------------------------
                                                 Michael E. Luttrell
                                                 Executive Vice President
·--.,... ,,.. .. ~609~ 0 3.3(h)(2) 

L 86-36/50 USC 3605 

' t=:=.NPr-

'f OP ffi!!Offiff = B'. S. BIBS ONtiY 'N'!•'WE 

SUBJECT Nill'1BER 

USCIB: 2!} • 9 /10 Item 2 of the Agenda for the :L09th Meeting of USCIB, 

held on 12 November 1954. 

Subject: ___________ lcuscrB 'i?J1.9/B). 

Ackerman's THE ACTING report CHA. on IRMAN .. ·· talks / {Gener[: with c.bo11 .. (':.:./rtt····/ed······attent·0-· ... ·o·· ... ·•···· .. n .t····· .. o General i i land asked i;f' General 

Ackerman wished to comment upon i.s/nego ia ions. 

GENERAL ACKERMAN explained that/Mr. /Durbrow's original message to 

the Department of State had been touched, /oft by the m.annel" in. which 

+be DeMrtment of State base rights/request/had been processed through 

povernmental channels, i.ri, it/had been sent t • · · the 

.__v,_a_r...,.i_o_u_s ... military and political branches/before reachin for coordination - which was his/first/knowledge of it. as. aroused 

over not having had an earlier/Crack.at the p:roposa, an decided to 

contact the Charg~. 

General A~/said that when/ this confusion had been set strait 

the talks with L__Jproceeded along the lines indicated in his report. 

He then noted the following specific considerations arising from the 

discussions • 

.__ ___________ lu..,..n.,..ii_· t _/We have complete freedom of action 

in asking the I Ito do things/for us, and he is amenable to 

stopping or changing/direction/at arry time in order to a.void duplication of intercept. 

Location - The I lwa11.t a separate c;ecure area adjacent to ours, 

with their own guards and .JO to 40 of their own personnel. Steerage 

of their efforts by the u./s. would be welcomed but is not a .condition. 

~----.======"'- To be a. one-way street for the U.S., i.e., 

the will give what is wanted by t.he U.S. and accept what the 

U.S. es to give tol t. 

Inspections - For the sake of appeara..11ces, the I .... ..,,.,,.._,,___ .... I will want 

to make occasional inspections of the U.S. area with U.S. operations 

secured and full prior notice. 

Method of Exchange -uose in havinJ I unit adjacent 

t,o ours is to permit the •to pass by hand material received by 

their unit from outlying its. 

General Ackerni.a.n then stated that one "hitch" at the moment is 

the question of the 11Status of Forces" arrangements. 

USCIB: 29.9/10 - I, -

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-22-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

TOP SECJlFT 
.. . ' ... 

USCIB: C} • 9 /10 

MR. POLYZOIDES pointed out that this is always a troublesome 

problem in our base rights negotiations and is normally the last matter 

resolved. 

THE ACTING CHAIRMAN invited further comments on the report. 

There were none. 

It was moved and seconded that the report be approved. 

All members agreed. 

THE ACTING CHAIRMAN said that he assumed it is understood that Ghe 

Departments of Defense and State will proceed with the base rights 

negotiations. 

DECISION: (12 November 1954) USCIB approved the report contained in 

~~~I~i!~~~~~ns ~~t~eed the fur+hr~ c=ents by General Ackerman on 

This item to be dropped from the agenda. EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

USCIB: 29.9/10 - 7 -

Y'OP 8ECRE'E'
EXHIBIT 32.1

           WRITTEN STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         The undersigned, Deborah C. Wright, is the Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer of Carver Bancorp (the "Company").

         This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2005 (the "Report").

         By execution of this statement, I certify that:

                  A)       the Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                           of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

                  B)       the information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company as
                           of the dates and for the periods covered by the
                           Report.

         This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report
so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that
this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended.




        June 28, 2005                                    /s/ Deborah C. Wright
     ----------------------                              ---------------------
           Dated                                         Deborah C. Wright





* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                       CONSENT OF DR. SAMUEL K. ACKERMAN

I hereby consent to being named as a person who will become a director of V.I.
Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("VITEX"), in connection with the
consummation of the merger (the "Merger") contemplated by the Agreement and Plan
of Merger and Reorganization (the "Agreement"), dated as of July 28, 1999, among
VITEX, Pentose Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Pentose"), and
the stockholders of Pentose listed on Schedule I to the Agreement, in the
Registration Statement on Form S-4 to be filed by VITEX with the Securities and
Exchange Commission in connection with the Merger (the "Registration
Statement"), and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement.



                                          Signature:/s/ Samuel K. Ackerman
                                                    ----------------------
                                                   Dr. Samuel K. Ackerman

Date: September 9, 1999.