alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# County, MD

RICHARD A 

### HENSON FIELD COMMERCIAL & 

### COMMUTERAIRSERVICE I

### AVIATION MAINTENANCE I

### AIRSIDE SERVICES May 12,2014
Mr. Dennis J. DeVany, Chief EAS & Domestic Analysis Division Office ofAviation Analysis United States Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Reference, Order: 2014-4-26 Dear Mr. DeVany: '=··, (.:''j'

.,,.:')

The Hagerstown Regional Airport objects to the Department ofTransportation's tentative order regarding termination ofEssential Air Service eligibility for Hagerstown, Maryland. The Airport does not dispute the Department's methodology for calculating enplanements nor does it object to the limiting distance of 175 miles from a large ormedium hub airport. The basis ofour objection lies in the fact that the air carrier chosen to provide EAS was plagued by a myriad ofoperational and regulatoryproblems that limited its ability to provide the necessary level ofservice to meet the 10-enplanement statutory requirement. The chosen air carrier startup service was plagued with aircraft dispatch reliability; aircraft and ground support equipment not suitable for winter operations; a shortage of qualified pilots; and a management team that was not fully committed to an aggressive marketing campaign for the new service.**Thes~** aforementioned problems were exacerbated bythe Sequester which made the certification ofaircraft and aircrews even more difficult to obtain. Under new management which took over operational direction ofSunAir in October 2014, most if not all ofthese previous issues have since undergone significant improvement The Hagerstown Regional Airport has been a pioneer in establishing regional air service as it exists today. Even a cursoryreview ofits history will show that the airport is capable '''<
.. ·

18434 Showalter Road 1Hagerstown, MD 21742 1 P: 240.313.2777 I F: 301.791.2590 I Hearing Impaired: 7-1-1 

# flyhagerstown.comDennis DeYaney May 12,2014 Page 2 of2 ofproviding a passengerbase for a successful BAS program. We have consistently demonstrated the capacity to provide 1 0+ enplanements time and time again. We feel that our eligibility to participate inthe BAS should not be terminated due to the lack luster performance ofour service provider The Hagerstown Regional Airport respectfully submits these objections for consideration.

l'**S~ cer**  , 

# ! .Ridenour Airport Director Board ofCounty Commissioners ofWashington County, Maryland Terry

### L. B r, President

ohnF. Barr, ice-President



# Qt4L{Ia£ Ruth Anne Callaham, Commissioner

Cc: Kevin Schlemmer, Director ofBAS

F:\AIRPORT OFF!CE\EAS\LTR-2014 05May12 DeVaney Ltr ofObjection doc
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

HomeHistoryCryptologic HistoryHistorical FiguresHistorical Figures View

# NSA Historical Figures

                Download            

# Richard “Dickie” George 

##                 2022 Hall of Honor Inductee            

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

2022Biographyhistorical figurehall of honorRichard “Dickie” George
Technical Support Document: Alabama Visible Emissions Rule Comparison

EPA first approved Alabama’s visible emissions regulations into the Alabama State Implementation Plan (SIP) in 1972. The last pre

- 2008 revision to those regulations (hereafter referred to as “existing SIP

- approved rule”) was adopted by the State with an effective date of October 15, 1996, and was approved into the SIP by EPA with an effective date of August 5, 1997

.
R ule 335

– 3

– 4

– .01, “Visible Emissions,” includes a 2 0 percent opacity limit that is generally applicable to all sources of particulate matter emissions . The existing SIP

- approved r ule provides an exemption to the 20 percent limit of one six

- minute period per hour for opacity of up to 40 percent. F or subje ct sources, t he 2008 revised rule eliminates the 40 percent hourly exemption and instead provides an exemption for up to 24 six

- minute periods per day for opacity of up to 100 percent, but only if the source does not exceed the 20 percent opacity limit for more than two percent of the quarterly operating time. The 2008 revised rule also limits subject sources to a daily opacity average of no more than 22 percent

. The table below presents a side

- by

- side comparison of the SIP

- approved rule before and aft er the 2008 rule revision, as applicable to subject sources

. 1

1 To simplify the comparison, the numbers shown in the table wer e calculated assuming the source had no periods of startup, shutdown, load change or rate change (or other short intermittent periods upon terms approved by the Alabama Department of En vironmental Management’ s Director and included in a State

- issued permit) because such periods are allowed under both the existing SIP

- approved rule and the 2008 revised rule

. [Alabama rule 335

– 3

– 4

– .01(1)(c)] Element Compared Existing SIP

- approved Rule 2008 Revised Rule Maximum # of exemptions allowed per day 24 (hourly) 24 (aggregate)

Maximum consecutive time of exempt periods allowed 0.1 hours (6 minutes) 2.4 hours (144 minutes)

Maximum opacity level of exempt periods allowed 40% 100% (as long as 22% daily average limit is not exceeded) Maximum average daily opacity allowed 22% ((24 x 40% + 216 x 20%) ÷ 240 ) 22% (as an enforceable limit) Maximum quarterly exempt time allowed 219 hours (10% of quarterly operating hours) 44 hours (2% of quarterly operating hours)
Maximum average quarterly opacity allowed 22% (based on daily average allowable) 21.6% (based on 438 six

- minute periods at 100% and 21,462 six

- minute periods at 20%) Compliance determination method EPA Reference Method 9 (Alabama rule 335

– 3

– 4

– .01(2)) Continuous opacity monitoring system (Alabama rule 335

– 3

– 4

– .01( 6 ))
**Exhibit 23.10**

 

**Consentof Wayne Ewert**

 

I consent tothe inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of North AmericanPalladium Ltd., which is being filed with the United States Securities andExchange Commission, of references to my name and to references to myinvolvement in the preparation of technical information relating to the SuhankoProject, Northern Finland, included in the 2007 Annual Information Form ofNorth American Palladium Ltd., dated March 31, 2008 (the “AIF”).

 

I also consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-10(Nos. 333-147126, 333-146513 and 333-133668) of the references to my name andthe above-mentioned information in the AIF.

 

Dated this 28 dayof March, 2008.

 

 
|   |   /s/ Wayne Ewert |   |
|--------|------------------------|--------|
| Name:  | Wayne Ewert            |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF XTRA CORPORATION FOR THE PERIOD
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       4,000,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               79,000,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                14,000,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                   2,112,000,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             658,000,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,585,000,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    892,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,000,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 352,000,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,585,000,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           435,000,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              301,000,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          63,000,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             71,000,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                28,000,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         43,000,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                43,000,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.78
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 39 (Friday, February 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 10731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04065]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 
20549-2736.

Extension:
    Form 20-F; SEC File No. 270-156, OMB Control No. 3235-0288.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of 
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this 
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and 
Budget for extension and approval.
    Form 20-F (17 CFR 249.220f) is used to register securities of 
foreign private issuers pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'') (15 U.S.C. 78l) or as annual 
and transitional reports pursuant to Sections 13 and 15(d) of the 
Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) and 78o(d)). The information required in 
the Form 20-F is used by investors in making investment decisions with 
respect to the securities of such foreign private issuers. We estimate 
that Form 20-F takes approximately 2,645.52 hours per response and is 
filed by approximately 725 respondents. We estimate that 25% of the 
2,645.52 hours per response (661.38 hours) is prepared by the issuer 
for a total reporting burden of 479,501 (661.38 hours per response x 
725 responses).
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden imposed by the collection of information; (c) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; 
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will 
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 
days of this publication.
    Please direct your written comments to Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief 
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi 
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549; or send an email 
to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ce9e9c8f9183afa7a2aca1b68ebdabade0a9a1b8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b6e6e4f7e9fbd7dfdad4d9cef6c5d3d598d1d9c0">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: February 23, 2015.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-04065 Filed 2-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
USCIB: 29.1/31 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

HA:NBfd!I VIA 0Ell:EN'i' SHMlNBbS CJU,¥ 

24 February 1955 

/\ / g 

·subject: U.K. Membership on the Combined Working Group (CWG) tor 

the Improvement of Allied (NATO) COMSEC. 

SUKLO, Washington advises that U.K. membership on the CWG is now as 

follows: 

USCIB: 29.1/31 

eclassified and a 

/ .. / 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

a: ain, U. • Navy 

.l.l&A.~~u.:t.ive Secretary, USCIB 

HA:NBH!l VIA eciu:N'i' 011A:NNmB SN±.¥ 

ursuant to E. 0. 1352 

-
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 34 (Friday, February 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 9262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03608]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting (amended meeting date).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EAC is amending the original Sunshine Notice that published on 
February 6, 2015. Due to an inclement weather forecast, EAC postponed 
the public meeting that was originally scheduled for Wednesday, 
February 18, 2015. The public meeting has been rescheduled for Tuesday, 
February 24, 2015, 10:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m.; U.S. Election Assistance 
Commission; 1335 East West Highway, EAC Office; Silver Spring, MD, 
20910. The EAC public meeting agenda items remain the same.

DATES: Tuesday, February 24, 2015, 10:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m. EST.

ADDRESSES: U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1335 East West Highway 
(EAC Office), Silver Spring, MD 20910, (Metro Stop: Silver Spring on 
the Red Line).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (301) 563-
3961.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

AGENDA ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 
<bullet> Selection of Chair and Vice-Chair
<bullet> Accreditation Decision for Pro V&V
<bullet> Briefing and Discussion of Voluntary Voting Systems Guidelines 
(VVSG 1.1)
<bullet> Briefing and Discussion of Program Manuals
<bullet> Discussion and Consideration of Roles and Responsibilities 
Document
    Commissioners will meet to select a chair and vice-chair and to 
discuss the following items: Accreditation Decision for Pro V&V; 
Briefing and Discussion of Voluntary Voting Systems Guidelines (VVSG 
1.1); Briefing and Discussion of Program Manuals; and Discussion and 
Consideration of Roles and Responsibilities Document. As stated in the 
original notice, members of the public who wish to speak at the meeting 
on proposed changes to the Voluntary Voting Systems Guidelines VVSG 1.1 
were requested to send a request to participate to the EAC no later 
than 5:00 p.m. EDT on Thursday, February 12, 2015.

STATUS:  This meeting will be open to the public.

    Dated: February 18, 2015.
 Bryan Whitener,
Director of Communications & Clearinghouse.
[FR Doc. 2015-03608 Filed 2-18-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P
\ . USCIB: 5. 2/93 

TOP S!Clt!T - t1.S. m'.'!'S ONLY 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

• 

9 May 1955 

Subject: Approval of the Ninutes of the 114th Meeting of USCIB. 

Reference: USCIB 5.2/90 dated 18 April 1955. . 

1. Subject to the insertion of the attached corrected pages in their 

appropriate places the Minutes of the 114th Meeting of USCIB are approved. 

2. It is requested.. that the word TENTATIVE be deleted from the 

initial page of the minutes for each item considered and the word FINAL 

substituted therefor. 

Enclosures 

Corrected pages 

~ 5, 7, and 8 

of subject minutes. 

Correction Sheet. 

USCIB: 5. 2/93 

-

H'ltlfflLE ffA 60MIN'i' 0HMINEiYJ QN:bY 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-25-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

TOP SECRET 

24 
...... ' .. .. "' 

,..!' 

TOP SiCii:l' 

Page, Para 

of Final 

Copr 

Page 5, 

Para 5 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

U,s, E¥.S8 ONM 

ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH MEEI'ING 

OF THE 

UNITED STATES COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE BOARD 

Tentative: 

Final: 

CORRECTION SHEET 

TEXT" (Tentative and Final) 

11 ••• prefer to have his Chief of Production do 

the negotiating and his Deputy Chief of Staff, 

Operations, who is his USCIBEC member, make the 

·decisions." 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

"· •• prefer to have his Deputy Director, 

Production, do the day-to-day negotiating with 

consumer representatives on matters of supplemental guidance, and his Deputy Chief of Staff, 

Operations, who is his USCIBEC member, to be 

his authorized representative in his relations 

with USCIB. 11 

Page 7, 

Para 6 

Page 7, 

Para 6 

Page 8, 

Para 2 

Tentative: 

Final: 

11 ••• in the event Siernens-Halske should sell a 

large order of tele-ciphering equipment to a nonNATO nation and that nation should then approach 

Mr. Hagelin to buy associated crypto equipment?" 

11 • • • in the event Siernens-Halske should obtain an 

order for tele-ciphering equipment from a nonNATO nation involving crypto equipment produced 

by Hagelin?" 

.TOP SECRET'
2013 authorization from Decision XXIII/4

(1) U.S. authorization from Decision XXIII/4 562,326 2.2%

- Maximum allowable new production/import 562,326 2.2%

= Minimum allowable CSA 0 0.0%

Calculate supply chain factor

U.S. authorization (1) 562,326 2.2%

 - Reduction for uptake of alternatives 0 0.0%

 = One year's CUE need 562,326 2.2%

x Percentage of year's production to recover 70%

(2) = SCF to meet that need 393,628 1.5%

Calculate stocks (= CSA)

Existing pre-phaseout inv on 1/1/12 ("ES") 1,248,876

- 2012 CSA Use ("D") 184,157

- 2012 Group II Use 449,595 1.8%

- SCF (2) 393,628 1.5%

(3) = stocks = CSA 221,495 0.9%

Calculate carryover

Reported as produced/imported in 2011 1,500,000

- Reported as sold in 2011 1,500,000

(4) = Unsold carryover 0

Calculate new production (=CUA)

Total U.S. authorization (1) 562,326 2.2%

- CSA (3) 221,495 0.9%

- Carryover (4) 0 0.0%

- Research 0 0.0%

- uptake of alternatives 0 0.0%

(5) = New production 340,831 1.3%

Calculate total amount allocated

CUA (5) 340,831 1.3%

 + CSA (3) 221,495 0.9%

= Total 562,326 2.2%

Option 2: Framework Approach Calculation
Exhibit 23
                         Consent of Independent Auditors


      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8, No. 333-46291) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Option Plan; Registration
Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-56504) pertaining to the 1992 Stock Option Plan and
the 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan; Registration Statement (Form
S-8, No. 33-63600) pertaining to the 1993 Company Stock Purchase Plan;
Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-18995) pertaining to the 1992
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan; Registration Statement (Form S-8, No.
33-84136) pertaining to the 1992 Stock Option Plan; and Registration Statement
(Form S-3, No. 33-92016) of The DeWolfe Companies, Inc. of our report dated
January 29, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of The DeWolfe Companies, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.


Boston, Massachusetts                                  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
March 26, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       5,932,931
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,932,931
<PP&E>                                      24,773,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,706,031
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          177,417
<BONDS>                                      4,229,398
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,299,216
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,706,031
<SALES>                                      4,422,790
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,561,528
<CGS>                                        1,358,566
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,358,566
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,214,251
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,988,711
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,988,711
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,988,711
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    62.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    62.41
        

</TABLE>