alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1327 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1327

To amend the Controlled Substances Act relating to controlled substance 
                               analogues.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 2015

    Ms. Klobuchar (for herself, Mr. Graham, Mrs. Feinstein, and Mr. 
   Grassley) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Controlled Substances Act relating to controlled substance 
                               analogues.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Synthetic Abuse and Labeling of 
Toxic Substances Act of 2015'' or the ``SALTS Act''.

SEC. 2. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE ANALOGUES.

    Section 203 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 813) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``A controlled'' and inserting ``(a) In 
        General.--A controlled''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Determination.--In determining whether a controlled substance 
analogue was intended for human consumption under subsection (a), 
evidence related to the following factors may be considered, along with 
all other relevant evidence:
            ``(1) The marketing, advertising, and labeling of the 
        substance.
            ``(2) The known efficacy or usefulness of the substance for 
        the marketed, advertised, or labeled purpose.
            ``(3) The difference between the price at which the 
        substance is sold and the price at which the substance it is 
        purported to be or advertised as is normally sold.
            ``(4) The diversion of the substance from legitimate 
        channels and the clandestine importation, manufacture, or 
        distribution of the substance.
            ``(5) Whether the defendant knew or should have known the 
        substance was intended to be consumed by injection, inhalation, 
        ingestion, or any other immediate means.
    ``(c) Limitation.--For purposes of this section, the existence of 
evidence that a substance was not marketed, advertised, or labeled for 
human consumption shall not preclude the Government from establishing, 
based on all the evidence, that the substance was intended for human 
consumption.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000


<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-29-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-2000
<CASH>                                                94,669
<SECURITIES>                                          48,034
<RECEIVABLES>                                         56,880
<ALLOWANCES>                                           1,700
<INVENTORY>                                           29,385
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     236,457
<PP&E>                                                73,798
<DEPRECIATION>                                        47,269
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       275,680
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 43,873
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                               1,763
<OTHER-SE>                                           226,397
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         275,680
<SALES>                                               78,335
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      78,335
<CGS>                                                 57,063
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         13,287
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (1,776)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        13
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        9,748
<INCOME-TAX>                                           3,934
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    5,814
<DISCONTINUED>                                             1
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                           5,815
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0.16



</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 39 (Friday, February 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10662-10663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04073]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

[EIS No. 2011-13640]

Retraction of Salt River Allotments Vegetative Management EIS

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Retraction of NOI.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Forest Service has published a Notice of Intent (NOI) on 
May 25, 2011 for Salt River Allotments Vegetative Management EIS. This 
Environmental Impact Statement was first designed due to complexities 
encountered with a variety of current activities and environmental 
conditions that interconnect along Salt River. These activities 
include: White water rafting, wilderness values, critical habitat of 
aquatic and terrestrial species. Planned livestock grazing project 
included a desire by term-grazing permittees to graze livestock (i.e., 
cattle) along river.

DATES: Not Applicable.

ADDRESSES: No further comments will be received on this project.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Jamie Wages 7680 South Sixshooter 
Canyon Road Globe, Arizona 85501,

[[Page 10663]]

[email protected] or 928-402-6222. Individuals who use 
telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service at (800) 877-8339 between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 
p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Selecting to do an EIS upfront was a 
shortcut for doing an EA and then not being able to certify proposed 
action did not have a significant impact in a FONSI. However, through 
discussions with term-grazing permittees, it was determined that if 
livestock were allowed to graze along river that neither Forest Service 
nor term-grazing permittees had time or money to conduct monitoring 
necessary to determine appropriateness of this proposed action along 
river corridor. By withdrawing complexity inherent in proposed action 
to graze along river, need for an EIS evaporated. Therefore, project 
planning will continue through an EA process. Environmental Impact 
Statement will be retracted on February 18, 2015.

    Dated: February 17, 2015.
Richard Reitz,
Globe Ranger District, Tonto National Forest.
    Dated: February 18, 2015.
Kelly Jardine,
Tonto Basin Ranger District, Tonto National Forest.
[FR Doc. 2015-04073 Filed 2-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
```
REF ID:A71770 

JCANP Vild.t to ISl - Revlaod 

R/D 1 8 JAN 1955 

WY.U.YS/60572/kba 

On our D/'! No. 'J4~~ ";;,OOtP Visit to NSA.11 dated 29 Deo 54, please delete 

and add 

~. -..,biteuan 

R. ?. Dilworth 

R.. flalker 

IIarry .~st. 

e;.----

, , - ,., j'IJ£~ 

\0 ... -bf.1.2n 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 02-07-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
# CE2004084EN.01076001.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/760 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/760

---

(2004/C 84 E/0856)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0081/04

by Proinsias De Rossa (PSE) to the Commission

(20 January 2004)

Subject:   Implementation of IPPC Directive in Ireland

Subject:

What response if any, has the Commission received from the Irish Government in response to the final written warning sent to Ireland in July 2003 (as announced in IP/03/1049) concerning the Irish Government's failure to properly implement the Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Directive (Council Directive 96/61/EC (1))? What action is the Commission taking or proposing to take in this regard?

1

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(11 March 2004)

(11 March 2004)

The Commission notified a Reasoned Opinion to Ireland on 11 July 2003 with regard to the incompleteness of national legislation to implement Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control (2). On 29 July 2003, Ireland sent new legislation, namely the Protection of the Environment Act, 2003, which, according to Ireland, correctly transposes the Directive. However, it appears that further secondary legislation is needed with regard to Article 6 of the Directive. In addition, requirements of the new Act need to be formally commenced with commencement orders. These outstanding elements are still awaited, and the Commission is considering the next appropriate steps to take.

2

---

(1)  OJ L 257, 10.10.1996, p. 26.

1

(2)  OJ L 257, 10.10.1996.

2

---
# CE2004084EN.01035201.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/352 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/352

---

(2004/C 84 E/0409)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0283/04

by Caroline Lucas (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(2 February 2004)

Subject:   Public procurement policy in timer

Subject:

Could the Commission clarify what timbers are being used in the supply of security and fire doors during refurbishment of the EU Joint Research Centre in Brussels, from which countries and by which timber companies these timbers have been supplied, and what evidence has been received to confirm that all timber used comes from legal and sustainable sources?

Answer given by Mr Kinnock on behalf of the Commission

(16 March 2004)

(16 March 2004)

The refurbishment of the building occupied by the Joint Research Centre in Brussels which took place in 1995-1996 was carried out by its owner, a private company, according to a lease agreement signed with the Commission in 1994.

In 1997, the Commission revised the ‘immeuble type’ document (1) which dated from 1992, and introduced a requirement that invitations to tender should specify that aspects of sustainable forest management should be taken into account.

1

However, as the refurbishment of the JRC building took place before 1997, the requirements related to the timber used in the supply of security and fire doors during refurbishment of the Joint Research Centre, as defined in the lease agreement, did not include a specific requirement to provide evidence that the timber came from such sustainable sources (through, for example, forest certification labels).

The renovation contract for the building was awarded by the owner of the building. Consequently, no detailed information on the timber used for the refurbishment is available to the Commission.

As demonstrated by the revision of the ‘immeuble type’ document, the Commission attaches great to the requirement to ensure that timber is provided from environmentally sustainable sources, and now has in place arrangements to ensure that this requirement is respected.

---

(1)  The ‘Immeuble Type’ document is the Commission's standard specification for buildings and sets out the standards for quality of space, use of materials and quality of technical installations.

1

---
%
aS

‘t

pn) a a
a4: ean

pReeanin ror cee, xa

SUBJECE: Boclusion of Hardware Clause in the R-W Contract

our conversetion this morning, the “Exclusion of
‘the current B-W contract reas as follows:

Hardware" clause in

i.

agrees that due to its unique position in

“The Contractor
administration

and

uw

|

a

amras

alts
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements pertaining to the ZOLL Medical Corporation 1992 Stock Option Plan(Form S-8 Nos. 333-68403, 33-90764, 33-56244, and 333-101839), the Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-101839) the 401(k) Saving Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-38048) and the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (Form S-8 Nos.333-101839 and 333-120310) of our report dated December 13, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of ZOLL Medical Corporation, ZOLL Medical Corporation’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of ZOLL Medical Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended October 2, 2005. 

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

December 13, 2005 

Boston, Massachusetts
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1778 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 258 ) IV-C-

4 Docket Number: 

# A-90-06

Printed 10/28/20089:51:03 AM Sheet 258of 276P. 2 UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENCY 

# iv-C- 4

SE P 

### 2 y 199 1

Honorabl e Clarenc e E . Mille r Hous e o f Representative s Washington , D.C . 2051 5 Dea r Mr . Miller : 

# lilULJLJjJ'Ii i

I - f ' : 

## OC T

## 2 I 1991

Thi s i s i n respons e t o you r Augus t 23 , 199 1 lette r regarding th e Environmenta l Protectio nAgency' s (EPA's ) interpretatio n o f th e definitio n o f "repowering. " Sectio n 402(12 ) o f th e Clea nAi r Ac t Amendment s o f 199 0 define s repowering a s th e "replacemen t o f a nexisting coal-fire d boiler " wit hon e o f severa l specifie d clea ncoa l technologies . Th e definitio n als o includes , a s qualifyin g technologies , othe r technologie s whic har e derivative s o f "on e o r mor e o f th e [specified ] technologies , and anyothe r technologycapabl e o f controllin g multipl e combustio n emission s simultaneousl ywit himprove d boile r o r generatio n efficienc yand wit hsignificantl ygreate r wast e reductio n relativ e t o th e performanc e o f technologyi n widesprea d commercia l use. " A s yo u hav e correctl ypointe d out , thi s definition , a s written , coul d b e interprete d a s limiting technologie s whic hwoul d b e considere d repowering project s t o thos e tha t onl yinvolv e th e replacemen t o r substantia l modificatio n o f th e boiler . A s par t o f th e rulemakin g process , EPAi s currentl ytakin g comment s o n it s proposa l t o amend regulation s implementin g ne w sourc e requirement s governin g modification s a t electri c utilit y generatin g units . Th e propose d rul e incorporate s th e statutory definitio n o f repowerin g withou t change . You r comment s ar e bein g give ncarefu l consideration , an d EPAwil l b e addressin g thi s issu e i nth e fina l rulemaking . I appreciat e thi s opportunit yt o b e o f servic e and trus t tha t thi s informatio nwil l b e helpfu l t o you . Sincerely , 

### /a/ Michae l H . Shapiro(for ) Willia mG . Rosenber g eOMCURAENCE S
J 

USCIB: 10./10 

20 April 19 54 

Sli:Clmr 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Press Reports of Australian COMINT Activity. 

The enclosed Memorandum for the Senior U. S. Liaison Officer, 

London (GIB #00127), dated 16 April 1954, is circulated for information. 

Enclosure 

a/s 

USCIB: 10,/10 . 

8BCR-ET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-11-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

24 
S~~EfD:A6614. 

UNITED STATES COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE BOARD 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN 

CIB # 00127 

16 April 19 54 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE SENIOR U.S. LIAISON OFFICER, LONDON: 

VIA: DIRECTOR, NATIONAL SEPURITY AGENCY. 

Subject: Press Reports of Australian COMINT Activity. 

1. The following press report was noted on United Press wire service 

on 15 April 1954: 

11CANBERRA, AUSTRALIA--AUSTRALIA HAS CRACKED THE CODES USED BY 

SOVIEr SECRE.T POLICE TO TRANSMIT REPORTS TO MOSCOW, RELIABLE 

SOURCES SAID. 

THESE SOURCES SAID DOCUMENTS TURNED OVER BY REFUGEE SOVIET 

EMBASSY THIRD SECRETARY VLADJNIR PETROV CONTAINED SUCH DETAILED 

BLUEPRINTS OF RUSSIA 1 S CODES T'dE SOVIET WOUID HA VE TO DRAFT NE.W 

SYSTEMS. 

THE DISCLOSURE CAME AS PRIME MINISTER ROBERT G. MENZIES DENIID 

AS 'LUDICROUS' SOVIET CLAIMS THAT PETROV HAD BEEN 1KIDNAPED 1 

INSTEAD OF SEl!KING POLITICAL ASYLUM VOLUNTARILY. 

MENZIES SAID HE WAS SATISFIED PETROV WAS NOT A RUSSIAN 'PLANT' 

WHO GAVE HIMSELF UP MERELY TO GATHER FURTHER INFORMATION. 

1THE DIRECTOR Gl!NERAL OF SECURITY COL. CIM F. SPRY INTERROGATED PETROV TO ENSURE HE WAS NOT A RUSSIAN PLANT, 1 MENZIES 

SAID. 'SPRY AI.SO INTENSIFIED AUSTRALIAN SECURITY WITH PARTICULAR 

REFERl!NCE TO COMMUNIST ACTIVITIES. THE RESULT HAS BEEN INCREASING 

DIFFICULTIES FOR COMMUNIST ESPIONAGE. 1 

MENZIES DENIED A CLAIM BY SOVIET AMBASSADOR NIKOLAI GENERALOV 

THAT THE EMBASSY APPLIED TO THE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT FOR 

PERMISSION TO SPEAK TO PETROV. IF THIS IS DONE, MENZIES SAID, 

PETROV WILL BE CONSULTED FIRST. tt 

2. Please draw this matter to the attention or LSIB security authorities with suitable indications that we would be grateful for information 

as to their views and whether any action is feasible and is contemplated 

in this instance. 

Copy to: 

SliHJO 

(Signed) 

RUFUS L. TATI.OR 

Captain, U. S. Navy 

Executive Secretary, USCIB 

En.closure with USCIB 10./10 dtd 20 Apr 1954. 

-SECRET
# CE2004078EN.01062501.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/625 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/625

---

(2004/C 78 E/0660)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3671/03

by Joost Lagendijk (Verts/ALE) and Arie Oostlander (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(9 December 2003)

Subject:   Further cooperation in the fight against terrorism

Subject:

Turkey recently suffered terrorist attacks on two synagogues on 15 November and on the British Consulate and the HSBC headquarters in Istanbul on 20 November 2003.

Does the Commission see any further possibility of extending cooperation with Turkey in the fight against terrorism, given that these attacks could impede the reform process in Turkey?

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(29 January 2004)

(29 January 2004)

The Commission is already providing assistance in a number of the areas defined by the United Nations (UN) as essential in the fight against terrorism, notably capacity building for the police, border control, customs and immigration services. In addition, the co-operation with Turkey in the fight against terrorism will be further extended through a twinning project which will start in early 2004 to strengthen the Financial Crimes Investigation Board (MASAK). This body has administrative, regulatory and supervisory powers concerning the identification of suspicious transactions related to money laundering and the financing of terrorism.

The twinning will analyse current Turkish legislation on money laundering, confiscation and forfeiture of proceeds related to financing of terrorism and draft proposals for improvements, will develop co-operation between all agencies involved in the fight against money laundering, and will train personnel.

A further twinning entitled ‘Strengthening the struggle against money laundering, financial sources of crime and the financing of terrorism’ with the Turkish National police will commence in late 2004. This twinning is intended to eliminate any legal or practical difficulties in the freezing and confiscation of terrorist assets, to assist the Turkish authorities to provide the widest possible range of assistance to other countries' law enforcement and regulatory authorities for terrorist financing investigations and to ensure that entities, in particular non-profit organisations, cannot be misused to finance terrorism.

---
Approved for Release: 2017/08/16 C05099865 

50X1 

Approved for Release: 2017/08/16 C05099865
# CE2004088EN.01014402.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/144 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/144

---

(2004/C 88 E/0153)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3435/03

by Stavros Xarchakos (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(20 November 2003)

Subject:   Act of provocation by Bulgaria towards a Member State

Subject:

Articles in the Greek press report that a postage stamp is in circulation in Bulgaria which shows part of Mount Athos (specifically the Zografos Monastery) as a part of Bulgarian territory. Despite protests from the Greek authorities, the Bulgarians refuse to withdraw the stamp on the grounds that it was issued in June 2001, under the Kostov government, and that to halt its circulation could provoke reactions from the opposition.

Is such provocative conduct by Bulgaria consistent with that befitting a country applying for accession to the EU? Will the Commission take action, and in what way, to prevent the circulation of the stamp concerned and make the Bulgarians realise that progress towards EU accession is not compatible with such conduct?

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(12 January 2004)

(12 January 2004)

According to information available to the Commission, the postage stamps referred to by the Honourable Member show the Zografos Monastery, a monastery in Greece with a Bulgarian speaking order.

However, the Union has no competence in matters relating to postage stamps. The Commission is, therefore, not in a position to take measures to prevent the circulation of the stamp concerned.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-01-1999
<CASH>                                         189,942
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,938
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               229,881
<PP&E>                                         128,644
<DEPRECIATION>                                 118,951
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 298,613
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          814,990
<BONDS>                                        482,449
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          331,957
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (848,334)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   298,613
<SALES>                                      1,194,251
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,194,251
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  904,431
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               272,865
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,929
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,026
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,026
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,026
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .000


</TABLE>