alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of C.C.C. and * From the 90th District Court

D.D.C., children, of Stephens County,

Trial Court No. CV32118A.

No. 11-23-00041-CV * August 17, 2023

* Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we 

reverse the order of the trial court, and we remand this cause to the trial court for 

further proceedings. Any proceeding on remand must be commenced within 180 

days of this court’s mandate. TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4 (c).
99-848.

#### Paton v. Paton.

Allen App. No. 1-98-74. Discretionary appeal allowed; *sua sponte,*cause held for the decision in 99-934 and 99-1095, *Williams v. Williams,*Warren App. No. CA98-09-114; briefing schedule stayed.
RE-~7540-

USCIB: 

HEMORANDUk FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIBEC: 

A.llpgm;m BOSUMliiN'f' SOH'f'AlNS 

00BEIWOM MJl"'fmtIJ.tII 

9 March 1955 

Subject: Approval of the Minutes of the 24th Meeting of USCIBEC. 

Reference: USCIB 5.3/73 of 21 February 1955. 

1. Subject to the insertion of the attached corrected page in its 

appropriate place, the minutes of the 24th meeting of USCIBEC are 

approved. · 

2. It is requested that the word TENTATIVE be deleted from the 

initial page of the minutes for each item considered and the word FINAL 

substituted therefor. 

Enclosure 

Corrected page 5 of subject minutes. 

USCIB: 5.3/76 

kPPBVBEIB BOOUMEMi' 66N'filN8 

CODEwO!i'D MkT!ftIAL 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-26-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

SECRET 

24
# CE2004084EN.01010901.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/109 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/109

---

(2004/C 84 E/0146)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3887/03

by Ria Oomen-Ruijten (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(16 December 2003)

Subject:   Measures to tackle legionnaires' disease

Subject:

On 22 October 2003 the Commissioner for Public Health and Consumer Protection, Mr Byrne, replied on behalf of the Commission to my written question on measures to tackle legionnaires' disease (E-2797/03) (1). However, his response failed to answer any of the four questions that I had raised.

1

| 1. | Is the Commission prepared to re-read carefully written question E-2797/03 and its answer and to provide detailed replies to the issues raised? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the Commission prepared to re-read carefully written question E-2797/03 and its answer and to provide detailed replies to the issues raised?

| 2. | As the Commission might well imagine, the questioner, along with present and potential victims of legionnaires' disease, are less than happy about being fobbed off with an answer that leaves them none the wiser. |
| --- | --- |

2.

As the Commission might well imagine, the questioner, along with present and potential victims of legionnaires' disease, are less than happy about being fobbed off with an answer that leaves them none the wiser.

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(2 February 2004)

(2 February 2004)

The Commission would like to confirm that:

| 1. | There are no compulsory guidelines concerning the matter raised. The European Working Group for Legionella Infections (EWGLI) network and its operating guidelines are entirely voluntary and there are no binding rules on the matter for the Member States or for any organisation in the Union. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There are no compulsory guidelines concerning the matter raised. The European Working Group for Legionella Infections (EWGLI) network and its operating guidelines are entirely voluntary and there are no binding rules on the matter for the Member States or for any organisation in the Union.

| 2. | Of course it is desirable for travel organisations to provide the fullest possible information on any disease that might be of concern to those receiving services from them. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Of course it is desirable for travel organisations to provide the fullest possible information on any disease that might be of concern to those receiving services from them.

As regards the questions concerning the submission by the Commission of proposals on the matter, these relate to the right of initiative of the Commission and have been fully addressed in the reply given previously to the Honourable Member's written question E-2797/03.

---

(1)  OJ C 78 E, 27.3.2004, p. 756.

1

---
REF ID:A65687 

USCIB: 13.2/19 

2 June 1954 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Approval of USCIB 13.2/17 dated 14 May 1954. 

Vote sheet action on subject paper has resulted in approval as of 

28 Ma.:r 1954. 

USCIB: 13.2/19 

RUFUS L. TA 

Captain, U. s. Navy 

Executive Secretary, USCIB 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 04-25-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
# CE2004088EN.01014301.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/143 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/143

---

(2004/C 88 E/0151)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3399/03

by Olle Schmidt (ELDR) to the Commission

(17 November 2003)

Subject:   Azerbaijan

Subject:

Presidential elections were recently held in Azerbaijan, which were followed by riots and political unrest. The new president, Ilham Aliyev, son of the former president, has already cracked down hard on any form of opposition. Azerbaijan is a country beset by a great many problems; large numbers of refugees, a ravaged environment and conflicts with its neighbours. At the same time, there are great riches to be exploited in the form of oil, which attracts interest in the region from many quarters, including the USA and the European Union. However, this economic interest must not lead us to turn a blind eye to the mismanagement of the country. Azerbaijan is in great need of reform and reconstruction, which is entirely possible with the anticipated revenue from oil. However, current events indicate that the country is more likely to become the fiefdom of the Aliyev clan, where progress towards democracy and improving living conditions do not come top of the agenda.

Will the Commission therefore say what steps are being taken to ensure that advances are made towards democracy in Azerbaijan at the same time as economic cooperation progresses? Has the EU attached any conditions to investment etc., such as linkage to progress on democracy, human rights, the situation of refugees and using the country's oil revenue for the good of the people as a whole?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(17 December 2003)

(17 December 2003)

The Commission has been assisting Azerbaijan make the transition to a democratic society based on a free market economy since 1992 with its technical assistance and other aid programmes. Currently these assistance programmes have poverty reduction and government reform as their principal objectives. The Government of Azerbaijan has recently started to implement its State Programme for Poverty Reduction and Economic Development (SPRED). The Programme has been welcomed by the International Financing Institutions and the wider donor community. The Spred provides the framework for all donor assistance in Azerbaijan. Only by addressing the fundamental and underlying problems will the progress to democracy and a free market economy be achieved.

The Commission along with the Member States carries out a very active dialogue on a wide range of matters including progress on democracy, human rights and the use of oil revenues for the good of the people as a whole. The Commission is one of the largest donors assisting Azerbaijan's refugees and Internally Displaced People through its programme for the rehabilitation of war damaged areas.

The Government of Azerbaijan has started to use its Oil Fund for the benefit of refugees who have been settled in different regions of Azerbaijan.

---
Agreement with Thomas Honey



 Exhibit 10.1 
 

 
 THOMAS HONEY AGREEMENT 
 APRIL 1, 2008 
 AGREEMENT TERM: Two years with annual renewal on anniversary date thereafter. 
 TITLE: President 
 ENTITY NAME: “EVE TEC” (Electronic Value
Exchange Technologies) or “VEE TEC” (Value Exchange & E-Commerce Technologies) 
 DUTIES & AUTHORITY: 
 REPORTS TO: The CMT Board of Directors 
 LIABILITY INDEMNIFICATION: D &
O Insurance of Board of Directors 
 LOCATION: United Kingdom by 1 June 2008 
 RELOCATION & REPATRIATION: 
  

	 	•	 	 Packing, storage & moving expenses 


  

	 	•	 	 Lease temporary residence in UK for two-year (2) term 


  

	 	•	 	 Repatriation to USA upon termination of employment including packing, storage and moving expenses. 


  

	 	•	 	 Animal quarantine (UK and US) 


 COMPENSATION:

  

	 	 •
	 	 10,000 Pound Sterling Base Compensation (5,000 Payable on 1st and 16th of each month via wire or ACH transfer)* 



 

	 	•	 	 5,000 Pound Sterling Signing Bonus (to get started) 


  

	 	•	 	 Incentive Compensation: To Be Determined (Consistent with European Industry Norms) 


  

	 	•	 	 CMT Stock & Options: Preferred Shares Convertible into 250,000 common shares of CMKT 


  

	 	 •
	 	 USD 1,000 monthly for Medical, Dental, & Travel Insurance (payable of 1st of month 


  

	 	•	 	 UK Automobile Lease & Insurance 


  

	 	•	 	 Ex-patriot Residency & Income Tax Equalization—To Be Determined 


  

	 	•	 	 Corporate Expense Card 


 TERMINATION: 
  

	 	•	 	 Employer Induced (Company dissolution, acquisition, redundancy, etc.)—90-day written notice with (a) lump sum payment equivalent to last six months base
and benefit compensation and (b) repatriation packing and moving expenses. 


  

	 	•	 	 Employee Induced—90-day written notice by employee with repatriation packing and moving expenses. 


  

	 	•	 	 Employer induced for Cause—Immediate with repatriation packing and moving expenses. 









 SIGNED BY: 
  

	
	 /s/ Jack Bouroudjian

	Jack Bouroudjian
	Chairman CMT
	
	 /s/ Tony Honey

	Tony Honey
ro~riif9A6570..Q. 

----- - " 

USCIB: 13.9/3 

24 March 1955 

!0P BElemft 

MEMORANDUM FOR '!HE MEt.ffiERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Notification of Hazardous Duty Assignment. 

USOIB Directive #11+. 

The enclosed notification from the Department of the Army 

Member is circulated £or inf orma.tion. 

Enclosure 

a/s 

USCIB: 13. 9/3 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-26-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

TOP SECRET 

24 
ffJdmfB@ 00MIN'!' 0I@lm:B em.f 

DEPAR~T OF THE AR1!Y 

OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT CHIEF OF STAFF, G-2, INTELLIGENCE 

WASHINGTON 25, D. c. 

3748 

22 MAR 1955 

!0P S!QMT 

MEUCRANDUM FOO: EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, USCIB 

SUBJECT: Ex.ception to Co.nmunications Intelligence Board Directive 

Number l4 

In compliance with SECTION III, paragraph C, USCIB Directive 

Number :U.., dated 25 June 1954, you are hereby advised that the Army 

member of USCIB has this date granted a standing exception for the 

following Group C individuals, currently indoctrinated for Category 

III CClUNT, to visit the Soviet sector of Berlin and such other 

cities within the Soviet Zone of Germany as necessary in the performance of their official duties: · 

Major General George Honnen, USCOB 

Colonel Ben Harrell, G/S, USGOB 

Lt Colonel Lewis E. Maness, Intelligence Officer, USCOB 

FCR THE ASSISTANT CHIBF OF STAFF, G-2 

(signed) 

J. H. l40NTGOMmY, JR 

Colonel, GS 

Chief, Plans and 

Policy Office 

Enclosure with USCIB 13.9/' dtd 24 March 1955 

TOP SECRET
Exhibit (32)(2)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of C-COR Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 24, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William T. Hanelly, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 that, to my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ WILLIAM T. HANELLY                                     
|William T. Hanelly Chief Financial Officer February 2, 2005
#### Burkhart, Respondent, vs. Burkhart and another, Appellants.

*January 9*

February *4, 1930.*

*629For the appellant London Guarantee and Accident Company there was a brief by *Hoyt, Bender, Trump, McIntyre & Hoyt*of Milwaukee and *Buchen & Schlichting*of Sheboy-gan, and oral argument by *Rodger M. Trump.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Bassuener & Humke*of Sheboygan, attorneys, and *Eberlein & Larson*of Shawano, of counsel, and oral argument by *M. G. Eberlein.*

Stevens, J.

The policy must be considered as if it contained the provision “that the insurer shall be liable to the persons entitled to recover for the death of any person . . . caused by the negligent operation, maintenance, use or defective construction of the vehicle described therein, such liability not to exceed the amount named in said . . . policy.” Sec. 85.25, Stats.

The policy contained no provision that injured persons, who were given a right of action against the insurance carrier by sec. 85.25 of the Statutes, should not maintain such action until liability was determined by final judgment or agreement of the parties, as in *Morgan v. Hunt,*196 Wis. 298, 220 N. W. 224. In the absence of such a provision in the contract of insurance, sec. 85.25 gives the injured person the right to join the insurance carrier with the assured as a defendant in the same action. *Morgan v. Hunt,*196 Wis. 298, 301, 220 N. W. 224.

In every case in which this court has construed sec. 85.25 it has been held that such a provision as that contained *630in this policy does not deprive the plaintiff of the right to join the insurance carrier as a defendant in an action against the one whose negligence caused the injury. In *Ducommun v. Inter-State Exchange,*193 Wis. 179, 186, 212 N. W. 289, 214 N. W. 616, the policy insured the defendant Strong “against money loss by reason of his legal liability to others,” which is in substance the same as the provision contained in this policy. In *Fanslau v. Federal Mut. A. Ins. Co.*194 Wis. 8, 11, 215 N. W. 589, it was held that the purpose of sec. 85.25 was “to permit persons who sustain injuries as the result of automobile accidents to join as a defendant the insurance company which has issued a policy of insurance to the owner . . . insuring or indemnifying the owner- from loss as a result of the particular accident.” In *Bro v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.*194 Wis. 293, 215 N. W. 431, the defendant company by its policy agreed “to indemnify” those protected by the policy.

The rule to be gathered from all these decisions is that “in all cases where the parties do not see fit to make an agreement to the contrary in the contract, the insured and the carrier may be joined as defendants in the same action.” *Morgan v. Hunt,*196 Wis. 298, 301, 220 N. W. 224. The parties not having made such an agreement in the contract here under consideration, the plaintiff had the right to join the insurance company as a defendant.

*By the Court,*— Order affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,597
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,880
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,617
<PP&E>                                         121,750
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,473
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 813,591
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          254,650
<BONDS>                                        524,592
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,366,252
<OTHER-SE>                                  (3,331,903)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   813,591
<SALES>                                        401,812
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               401,812
<CGS>                                          425,662
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  425,662
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,711
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,767
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (48,328)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (48,328)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (48,328)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.004)
                                            

</TABLE>
Exhibit 8.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

The following is a list of the
Registrants subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009, other than certain subsidiaries that did not in the aggregate constitute a significant subsidiary.



|                                    |  |                             
|----------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Company Name                        |  | Jurisdictionof Incorporation
|Corbett Research Pty. Ltd           |  | Australia                   
|Corbett Robotics Pty. Ltd           |  | Australia                   
|DxS Ltd.                            |  | UK                          
|SABiosciences                       |  | Maryland                    
|QIAGEN Shenzhen                     |  | China                       
|QIAGEN Australia Holding            |  | Australia                   
|QIAGEN Deutschland Holding GmbH     |  | Germany                     
|QIAGEN Gaithersburg, Inc.           |  | Delaware                    
|QIAGEN GmbH                         |  | Germany                     
|QIAGEN Hamburg GmbH                 |  | Germany                     
|QIAGEN, Inc. (USA)                  |  | California                  
|QIAGEN Instruments AG               |  | Switzerland                 
|QIAGEN K.K.                         |  | Japan                       
|QIAGEN Ltd.                         |  | UK                          
|QIAGEN North American Holdings Inc. |  | California                  
|QIAGEN Sciences, LLC.               |  | Maryland
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON 

ORDER 

Cause No 01 -12-00571-CV, In re Ronald Castillo, Relator 

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus from Jennene Kemp, individually 

and as next friend of JL.K., a minor v. Ronald R. Castillo & Porter Athletic Equipment Co., No. 

65459, in the 149th Judicial District Court of Brazoria County, Texas, the Hon. Terri Holder, 

presiding. 

On June 21, 2012, relator, Ronald Castillo, petitioned for a writ of mandamus. It is 

ordered that the response of the real party in interest, if any, is due Thursday, July 12, 2012. 

It is so ORDERED. 

Judge's signature: Is/ Evelyn V. Keyes 

Acting individually 

Date: June 22, 2012
 E384 Pre­Field Checklist (/E384+Pre­Field+Checklist)

 Edit 3 (/page/history/E384+Pre­Field+Checklist) ... (/page/menu/E384+Pre­Field+Checklist)

Let's discuss what we need to do before heading out to the field to collect imagery with our E384.

Designate the Windows Laptop that you will be carrying in the field. Download Mission Planner for E384

(https://www.event38.com/Articles.asp?ID=270 ). Using Mission Planner, go to the Flight Plan screen and cache the maps

you want to see during your flight. Simply zoom into your area of interest and anything you see there will be automatically

cached. Now plug in the ground side telemetry radio into the laptop that will be used in the field. Wait until the drivers have

been successfully installed. Make sure your laptop is charged or that you will have a power supply in the field.

Check that all of your batteries are fully charged; Flight Batteries, Spektrum Transmitter batteries, and the camera battery. If

you are using a Canon Camera, make sure your SD card is clear of images, locked, and placed into the camera. If you are

using the Samsung NX1100, clear all images and insert the SD card. The SD card should not be locked when using the

Samsung NX1100.

Now, pack everything up, and head out.

Pre­Field Checklist

­Designate a Windows Laptop

­Download Mission Planner for E384

­Download Telemetry Radio Drivers

­Cache Maps

­Charge Batteries

­­Flight Batteries

­­Transmitter Batteries

­­Camera Battery.

­Prepare SD Card

­Pack Up

­­Flight Batteries

­­Fuselage

­­Tail

­­Elevator

­­Wings

­­Wing Spar

­­Propeller

­­Transmitter

­­Camera

­­Ground Side Telemetry

­­Laptop

­­Rubber Bands

­­Phillips Screwdriver

­­Adjustable Pliers (Or Similar)
Help · About · Blog · Pricing · Privacy · Terms · Support · Upgrade

Contributions to http://event38.wikispaces.com/ are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share­Alike 3.0 License.

Portions not contributed by visitors are Copyright 2015 Tangient LLC

Proceed to Attaching E384 Tail.
.t 

• 

• 

USCIB: 13.5/53 

7 April 1954 

60NFIBl!iN'f IM:i 

Ml!MORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Anderson Case. 

1. The attached is circulated for information as an outline of 

method of handling and inf orma.tion desired in interviewing subject 

named person pursuant to the recommendations of USCIBEC at its 

Thirteenth Meeting on 26 March 1954. 

2. It is understood that representatives of the Army Security 

Agency will conduct the interview as soon as it can be conveniently 

and inconspicuously arranged. 

Enclos~e 

a/s 

USCIB: 13.5/53 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-24-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 

C01'VFKJEHT6AL 

31 
r 

• 

00NFIBEN'UM. 

• OUTLINE FOR ANDERSON INTERVIEW 

• 

1. Assume that Anderson is honest and well intentioned. 

2. Keep interview on a cordial basis. 

3. Find out nature and extent of cautioning he was given against 

t:raveling in Yugoslavia, if any. 

4. Find out what he did in Yugoslavia and how the Yugoslavs whom 

he met reacted, specifically: 

a. Were they friendly or suspicious? 

b. Did thef evince any interest in his previous activities 

(while with the Army)? 

c. Did they give Bey' indication of knowing he had special 

knowledge, ii' so, in what way? 

d. Was he questioned by the police and if so, what was asked 

and how did he reply? 

e. Was he questioned by anyone, if so, under what circumstances, what were the questions and how did he reply? 

r. Does he believe he was kept under surveillance, if so, 

what made him believe this? 

g. Why did he leave Yugoslavia? 

h. Does he know anything other than as answered above that he 

thinks might be of interest in assessing the reaction of the Yugoslavs 

to his presence and activities in their country? 

Enclosure with USCIB 13.5/53 dtd 7 Apr 1954.