BEFORE THE 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION •^-' 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA Docket No. CP10SW0014 

FAA Case No. 2009SW270037 

DMS No. FAA-2010-0981 "?^) 

Judge Richard C. Goodwin.~7, 

"1 

V 5g ^ 

ANSWER OF ro po o 

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC. - £5 ^ 

00 

Pursuant to Rule 209 of the Riiles of Practice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions (14 

C.F.R. Part 13, Subpart G), Continental Airlines, Inc. ("Continental" or 

"Respondent"), by the undersigned, files this Answer to the Complaint of the Federal 

Aviation Administration ("FAA") in the above-captioned case that was served by 

certified mail on October 13, 2010, and states as followsAdmissions and Denials 

1. The procedural history recited in Complaint section identified as I is 

ADMITTED. 

2. The allegations in Complaint paragraph identified as II 1 are ADMITTED. 

3. The allegations in Complaint paragraph identified as II 2 are ADMITTED. 

4. The allegations in Complaint paragraph identified as II 3 constitute the 

FAA's characterization of the aircraft maintenance log referenced in that paragraph. 
Answer of Continental Airlines, Inc. 

Page 2 

which speaks for itself and the best evidence of its contents. Continental is without 

sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny the remaining allegations in 

Complaint paragraph identified as II 3 at this time and intends to conduct discovery in 

this matter in accordance with the Rules of Practice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions and 

the Procedxiral Order. 

5. The allegations in Complaint, paragraph identified as II 4 quote firom the 

aircraft maintenance log, which speaks for itself and is the best evidence of its 

contents. Continental is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny 

the remaining allegations in Complaint paragraph identified as II 4 at this time and 

intends to conduct discovery in this matter in accordance with the Rules of Practice in 

FAA Civil Penalty Actions and the Procedural Order. 

6. The allegations in Complaint paragraph identified as II 5 quote from the 

aircraft maintenance log, which speaks for itself and is the best evidence of its 

contents. Continental is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny 

the remaining allegations in Complaint paragraph identified as II 5 at this time and 

intends to conduct discovery in this matter in accordance with the Rules of Practice in 

FAA Civil Penalty Actions and the Procedural Order. 

7. Continental is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or 

deny the allegations in Complaint paragraph identified as II 6 at this time and intends 

to conduct discovery in this matter in accordance with the Rules of Practice in FAA 

CivU Penalty Actions and the Procedural Order. 
Answer of Continental Airlines, Inc. 

Page s 

8. Continental is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or 

deny the allegations in Complaint paragraph identified as II 7 at this time and intends 

to conduct discovery in this matter in accordance with the Rules of Practice in FAA 

Civil Penalty Actions and the Procedural Order. 

9. Continental is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or 

deny the allegations in Complaint paragraph identified as II 8 at this time and intends 

to conduct discovery in this matter in accordance with the Rules of Practice in FAA 

Civil Penalty Actions and the Procedural Order 

10. Continental is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or 

deny the allegations in Complaint paragraph identified as II 9 at this time at this time 

and intends to conduct discovery in this matter in accordance with the Rules of 

Practice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions and the Procedural Order. 

11. Continental is without sufficient information to admit or deny the 

allegations in Complaint paragraph identified as II 10 at this time and intends to 

conduct discovery in this matter in accordance with the Rules of Practice in FAA Civil 

Penalty Actions and the Procedural Order. 

12. Continental ADMITS the allegations in Complaint paragraph identified as 

nil . 

13. Continental ADMITS the allegations in Complaint paragraph identified as 

II 12. 

14. Continental DENIES that it violated the regulations cited in Complaint 

paragraphs identified as II a, b, c, and/or d. following paragraph II12, pending 
Answer of Continental AirUnes, Inc. 

Page 4 

discovery in this matter. Answering further. Continental states that the regulations 

cited in those paragraphs speak for themselves and are the best evidence of their 

contents. 

15. Continental ADMITS that the maximum penalty per violation under the 

regulation(s) cited in paragraph II 1 of the Complaint is $25,000, but Continental 

DENIES that it violated the regulation(s) cited in the Complaint or is otherwise 

subject to a civil penalty in this case, pending discovery in this matter. 

16. Continental DENIES any allegation in the Complaint not specifically 

addressed in this Answer. 

Affirmative Defenses 

1. For its first affirmative defense, Continental asserts that the FAA has 

failed to state a claim upon which relief can be based. 

2. For its second affirmative defense. Continental asserts that the proposed 

civil penalty is excessive, not appropriate and unwarranted under the circumstances 

presented. 

Rehef Requested 

Continental respectfully requests that the Complaint be dismissed with 

prejudice. 

Place of Hearing 

Continental requests that the hearing in this matter be held in Houston, Texas, 

which is the corporate headquarters for Respondent and the place from which most 

Continental witnesses will Hkely be called to testify. 
Answer of Continental AirUnes, Inc. 

Page 5 

Duration of Hearing 

Continental expects at this time that the hearing will last two days, but may 

take substantially longer depending on the witnesses to testify and the evidence to be 

presented. 

Respectfully submitted, 

CONTOJENTAE;AI^NES, IN^ 

By: / 

Thomas Newton Boiling 

Managing Attorney, RegulatoryltSiairs 

November 16, 2010 

DCIWDMS: 1375I322..1 
Answer of Continental AirHnes, Inc. 

Page 6 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that on this 16**> day of November 2010,1 caused a true copy of the 

foregoing Answer to be served' 

by U.S. certified mail (original and one copy), return receipt requested, to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

and by U.S. certified mail (one copy), return receipt requested, to: 

Tim Duff, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel, ASW-7 

Southwest Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Boulevard 

Fort Worth, TX 76193-0007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building, Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

Judith A. Dabney ^