alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 35 (Monday, February 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 9434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03614]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-8-2015]


Foreign-Trade Zone 72--Indianapolis, Indiana; Expansion of 
Subzone 72B; Eli Lilly and Company; Plainfield, Indiana

    An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) 
Board by the Indianapolis Airport Authority, grantee of FTZ 72, 
requesting an expansion of Subzone 72B on behalf of Eli Lilly and 
Company (Eli Lilly) to include a site in Plainfield, Indiana. The 
application was submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-
Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the regulations of 
the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally docketed on February 
13, 2015.
    Subzone 72B was approved on July 26, 1985 (Board Order 309, 50 FR 
3l404, 8-2-1985), and expanded on April 15, 2002 (Board Order 1222, 67 
FR 20086, 4-24-2002). The subzone currently consists of two sites: Site 
1 (359 acres)--five parcels in the Indianapolis area, Marion County; 
and, Site 3 (751 acres)--State Road 63, Clinton, Vermillion County.
    The current request would add a site (34 acres) located at 2222 
Stanley Road in Plainfield, Hendricks County, to the subzone. No 
additional authorization for production activity has been requested at 
this time.
    In accordance with the FTZ Board's regulations, Elizabeth Whiteman 
of the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and 
make recommendations to the FTZ Board.
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary at the 
address below. The closing period for their receipt is April 6, 2015. 
Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the 
foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period 
to April 20, 2015.
    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection 
at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, 
Room 21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230-0002, and in the ``Reading Room'' section of the 
FTZ Board's Web site, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Whiteman at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3d785154475c5f584955136a55544958505c537d494f5c5958135a524b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="afeac3c6d5cecdcadbc781f8c7c6dbcac2cec1efdbddcecbca81c8c0d9">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 482-0473.

    Dated: February 13, 2015.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-03614 Filed 2-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
REF ID:A6575~ 

USCIB: 13. 7 /'J2 

20 August 1954 

MEM>RANDUM FOli THE MEMBERS OF IBCIB: 

Subject: Approval or 13.7/31. 

1. Vote Sheet replies to the document mentioned in the 

above subject indicate approval by ~ members ror clearance or 

Captain Garrett v. Graves, tB01. 

2. The NSA member has been notified informally ot this 

decision. 

IBCIB: 1.3.7/32 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-15-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

24 
~L"'Ip_;A6575~ 

onc:trnL • 

USCIB: 13. 7 /31 

10 August 1954 

M!MORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Indoctrination for Category III CO~UNT (GRAVES). 

USCIB 13.7/15 dated 18 May 1954. 

1. The Treasury Department Member of the U.S. Communications 

Security Board has informed this office that he intends to designate 

Captain Garrett V. Graves, USCG, prospective Chief of Communications of 

the Coast Guard, to assist him in matters pertaining to the business of 

the U.S. Communications Security Board. 

2. Inasmuch as it is anticipated that Captain Graves' duties will 

inevitably include a requirement for access to CCMINT, approval is 

requested for his indoctrination for Category III CCJ.!INT. 

3. Attention is invited to the reference. Inasmuch as this 

clearance is being requested on the basis of duties involving USCSB 

business only, the NSA Member of USCIB rather than the Navy Member is 

considered to be the proper agent to carry out the necessary clearance 

and indoctrination procedures if the request is approved. 

4. For the information of members, no proposal was made to have 

Captain Graves' predecessor, Captain Rhodes, indoctrinated when CSB 

started in business because it was known that Captain Rhodes was to be 

relieved soon and it was felt at'the time by the Treasury Department 

Member of CSB that he could get along for the time being without the 

assistance of the Chief of Coast Guard Communications. 

5. It is requested that the attached vote sheet be executed and 

returned to this office by the close of business on 19 August 1954. 

USCIB: 13. 7 /31 

SECRET 

24 

 ...;..... _____________ ---------- -- --- -- --
**Subway Audio Loop -**  **Video Clip**

This link will connect you to a place on the Access Board website where the Video Clip can be found. We were unable to upload the clip into regulations.gov. Link: http://www.access
- board.gov/images/videos/SubwayAudioLoop.m4v Note: The clip is 8.7 MB in size and may load slowly.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 23

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8, No. 333-93513) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Option Plan;
Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-46291) pertaining to the 1998 Stock
Option Plan; Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-56504) pertaining to
the 1992 Stock Option Plan and the 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option
Plan; Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-63600) pertaining to the 1993
Company Stock Purchase Plan: Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-18995)
pertaining to the 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan; Registration
Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-84136) pertaining to the 1992 Stock Option Plan;
and Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 33-92016) of The DeWolfe Companies,
Inc. of our report dated January 28, 2000, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of The DeWolfe Companies, Inc. included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.





                                                          Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 17, 2000
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Aware, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Michael A. Tzannes                           /s/ Robert J. Weiskopf
----------------------                           ----------------------
Chief Executive Officer                          Chief Financial Officer


Date:  March 14, 2006                            Date: March 14, 2006


     The certification set forth above is being furnished as an exhibit solely
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed
as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or
the certifying officers.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 40820 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
EDGAR ELEAZAR LOZANO

- LUCERO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:15

- CR

- 67

- 1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Edgar Eleazar
Lozano

- Lucero has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lozano

- Lucero h a s not fi led a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 17, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-40820 Document: 00513383939 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016No. 15

- 40820

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-40820 Document: 00513383939 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
----

(2004/C 65 E/290)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3505/03

by Hiltrud Breyer (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(24 November 2003)

Subject:   Information on the level of EU funding granted to Saarland between January 1997 and December 2002

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(2 December 2003)

The Commission is collecting the information it needs to answer the question. It will communicate its findings as soon as possible.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS LEGEND CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BOYKIN LODGING COMPANY AS OF DECEMBER 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001015859
<NAME> BOYKIN LODGING COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,643
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,295
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         627,844
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,712
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 615,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        286,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     286,216
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   615,062
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,122
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,423
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,059
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,498
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,142
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,142
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,138)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,004
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.25
<FN>
<F1>REGISTRANT UTILIZES AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET THEREFORE TOTAL CURRENT
ASSETS AND TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES ARE NOT APPLICABLE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 30, 2011 

p0323 

Order 

 

March 30, 2011 

142031 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142031 

 COA: 291841 

Wayne CC: 06-008116-FC 

LINCOLN ANDERSON WATKINS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 5, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall 

include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether MCL 768.27a conflicts with MRE 

404(b) and, if it does, (2) whether the statute prevails over the court rule, see McDougall 

v Schanz, 461 Mich 15 (1999), and Const 1963, art 6, § 1 and § 5; (3) whether the 

omission of any reference to MRE 403 in MCL 768.27a (as compared to MCL 

768.27b(1)), while mandating that evidence of other offenses “is admissible for any 

purpose for which it is relevant,” would violate a defendant’s due process right to a fair 

trial; and (4) whether MCL 768.27a interferes with the judicial power to ensure that a 

criminal defendant receives a fair trial, a power exclusively vested in the courts of this 

state under Const 1963, art 6, § 1. 

 The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys 

Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups 

interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court 

for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Airguide, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2006, I hereby certify solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1. The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 20, 2006



|            |  |                         
|----------- |  | ------------------------
|            | 
|            |  | /s/   Nicholas J. Malino
|Print Name: |  | Nicholas J. Malino      
|Title:      |  | Controller
NRO Director winds Goddard Award from 

National Space Club

March 21, 2000 

Mr. Keith Hall, National Reconnaissance Office Director, will receive the Dr. Robert H. 

Goddard Memorial Trophy, the National Space Club's most prestigious award, at the 

organization's annual Goddard Memorial Dinner March 31. 

The Space Club noted that Hall "played a pivotal role in the evolution and maturity of national 

security space applications. His vision for broad-based, integrated intelligence from space has 

transformed a closely-held, specialized field of space-borne technology into one that is widely 

regarded, eminently capable, and constantly relied upon." Hall was also recognized for his 

leadership in space research and development.

The recipient of the award is selected annually for great achievement in advancing space flight 

programs contributing to United State leadership in astronautics. Former winners include John 

Glenn, Wernher Von Braun, President Ronald Reagan and former NRO deputy director Jimmie 

Hill. 

The Space Club will also recognize Air Force Colonel John Cunningham as the winner of the Dr. 

Joseph Charyk Award, which recognizes an individual in, or supporting the NRO who has made 

an outstanding personal contribution to the national intelligence space program. 

Cunningham was recognized for his innovative ideas which pioneered a number of systems that 

directly benefited a wide range of NRO customers and he established fruitful and lasting 

relationships with a wide network of U.S. space-related organizations.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-1258

___________

Sheryl H. McKinney, as parent and *

next friend of Christy R. McKinney, *

*

Plaintiff, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.; Ford * Western District of Arkansas.

Motor Company, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Defendants, *

*

St. Edward Mercy Medical Center, *

*

Movant, *

*

Joey McCutchen, *

*

Movant - Appellant, *

*

Richardson, Stoops, Richardson & *

Ward, *

*

Movant - Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: July 5, 2002

 Filed: July 23, 2002

___________

Before LOKEN, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
1

The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Arkansas.

-2-

___________

PER CURIAM.

In this diversity tort action, attorney Joey McCutchen appeals from the district

court’s1

 adverse grant of summary judgment as to his Arkansas attorney-lien claim.

See Ark. Code Ann. § 16-22-304 (Michie 1999). Upon de novo review, see First

Bank of Marietta v. Hogge, 161 F.3d 506, 510 (8th Cir. 1998), we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court, see 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>
 
 
                                                                    Exhibit 12.2


                       CABOT INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, L.P.
                      Computation of Ratio of Earnings to
                 Fixed Charges and Preferred Distributions (a)
                            (Dollars in thousands)



<TABLE> 
<CAPTION>                            

                                                     For the Nine 
                                                     Months Ended 
                                                     September 30,
                                                         1998       
                                                     ------------- 
<S>                                                  <C> 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before
   earnings from equity investments.................  $    36,091
Plus interest expense and amortization
   of deferred financing costs......................        3,317
                                                      -----------

Earnings before fixed charges.......................  $    39,408
                                                      ===========

Fixed charges and preferred 
   distributions (b), (c)...........................  $     3,779
                                                      =========== 

Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges
   and preferred distributions......................       10.43x 
                                                      =========== 
</TABLE> 

----------------------
(a)  The Operating Partnership commenced operations on February 4, 1998.

(b)  There were no preference securities outstanding during the period ended
     September 30, 1998.

(c)  Fixed charges consist of interest expense (including amortization of 
     deferred financing costs) and capitalized interest.
----

----

II Akti, katerih objava ni obvezna

Komisija

Upravna komisija Evropskih skupnosti za socialno varnost delavcev migrantov

----

SKLEP št. 204

z dne 6. oktobra 2005

o vzorčnih obrazcih, potrebnih za izvajanje uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 1408/71 in (EGS) št. 574/72 (serija E 200)

(Besedilo velja za EGP in za Sporazum EU/Švica)

(2006/613/ES)

UPRAVNA KOMISIJA ZA SOCIALNO VARNOST DELAVCEV MIGRANTOV JE –

ob upoštevanju člena 81(a) Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 1408/71 (1) z dne 14. junija 1971 o uporabi sistemov socialne varnosti za zaposlene osebe, samozaposlene osebe in za njihove družinske člane, ki se gibljejo znotraj Skupnosti, v skladu s katero je Upravna komisija dolžna obravnavati vse upravne zadeve, ki izhajajo iz Uredbe (EGS) št. 1408/71 in iz poznejših uredb,

ob upoštevanju člena 2(1) Uredbe (EGS) št. 574/72 (2) o določitvi postopka za izvajanje Uredbe (EGS) št. 1408/71, v skladu s katerim je Upravna komisija dolžna pripraviti vzorce dokumentov, potrebnih za izvajanje uredb (EGS) št.1408/71 in (EGS) št. 574/72,

ob upoštevanju Sklepa št. 184 (3) z dne 10. decembra 2001 o vzorčnih obrazcih, potrebnih za izvajanje uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 1408/71 in (EGS) št. 574/72 (E 201 do E 207, E 213 in E 215),

ob upoštevanju Sklepa št. 188 (4) z dne 10. decembra 2002 o vzorčnih obrazcih, potrebnih za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 574/72 (E 210 in E 211),

ob upoštevanju naslednjega:

SKLENILA:

Predsednik Upravne komisije

Anna HUDZIECZECK

----

(1)UL L 149, 5.7.1971, str. 2, Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 647/2005 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 117, 4.5.2005, str. 1).

(2)UL L 74, 27.3.1972, str. 1, Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 647/2005 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.

(3)UL L 304, 6.11.2002, str. 1, popravljeno v UL L 315, 19.11.2002, str. 22.

(4)UL L 112, 6.5.2003, str. 12.

----

----
---

---

# Exhibit 13

# CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
 TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Check
Point Software Technologies Ltd., an Israeli corporation (the Company), does
hereby certify, to the best of such officers knowledge, information and belief, that

The
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Form
20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 20-F
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|Date: March 13, 2006 |  | BY: /S/ Gil Shwed
Gil ShwedChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | BY: /S/ Eyal Desheh
Eyal DeshehExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---