alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of theundersigned officers of Supreme Industries, Inc. (the “Company”), does herebycertify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the “Form10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.
|   DATE: November 14, 2006 |                            |   /s/ Herbert  M. Gardner |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                           |   Herbert M.  Gardner      |
|                           |   Chief  Executive Officer |

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant toItem 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, andis not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporationlanguage in such filing.

----
# Fourth Court of Appea ls

San Antonio, Texas

November 15, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00703

- CR and 04

- 16

- 00704

- CR

Fanny M. STUART, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR3449 and 2016CR5416 Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

In the interest of the efficient administration of the court ’ docket, we ORDER Appeal

Nos. 04

- 16

- 00703

- CR and 04

- 16

- 00 704

- CR, styled Fanny M. Stuart v. The State of Texas

, consolidated. The parties must file motions, briefs, and other pleadings as if the appeals were one but put both appeal numbers in the style of the case. However, a record must be filed in each appeal, the record in each case will remain separate and, if supplementatio n of the record becomes necessary, the supplemental material must be filed in the appeal to which it applies. The cases must be argued together in one brief, as in a single appeal , and if oral argument is requested and granted, the entire case must be arg ued as a single appeal, with the total time limit for each party equal to the ordinary time limit for a party in a single appeal. The court will dispose of both appeals in the same judgment, opinion, and mandate.

We order the clerk of this court to serv e a copy of this order on all counsel.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 15th day of November, 2016

.___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF SAN

FERNANDO VALLEY; THE FAIR

HOUSING COUNCIL OF SAN

DIEGO, individually and on behalf of

the GENERAL PUBLIC,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

ROOMMATES.COM, LLC,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 04-56916

D.C. No. CV-03-09386-PA

ORDER

FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF SAN

FERNANDO VALLEY; THE FAIR

HOUSING COUNCIL OF SAN

DIEGO, individually and on behalf of

the GENERAL PUBLIC,

 Plaintiffs - Appellees,

 v.

ROOMMATE.COM, LLC,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 04-57173

D.C. No. CV-03-09386-PA

FILED

DEC 13 2007

CATHY A. CATTERSON, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
page 2

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge.

The stipulation of the parties to allow filing of a brief by amici curiae

Amazon.com, et al., is rejected. Amici curiae Amazon.com, et al., are denied leave

to file a brief. See Circuit Advisory Committee Note to 9th Cir. R. 29-2 (July 1,

2007).
Dear Shaheerah Kelly, have you made a decision ....

hswriter@frontiernet.net to: R9AirPermits, Omer Shalev 11/18/2013 08:05 PM

Cc: Deborah Jordan

From: "hswriter@frontiernet.net" <hswriter@frontiernet.net>

To: R9AirPermits@EPA, Omer Shalev/R9/USEPA/US@MSO365, 

Cc: Deborah Jordan/R9/USEPA/US@MSO365

Please respond to "hswriter@frontiernet.net" <hswriter@frontiernet.net>

History: This message has been forwarded.

Dear Shaheerah, 

I wrote to you on November 9th, 2013 requesting 90 days 

after the December 10th, hearing on The Sierra Pacific 

"modification" permit for written comments.

Have you reached a decision yet? 

Thank you,

Heidi Strand, Citizens for Clean Air
EXHIBIT 32.1



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

CEO CERTIFICATION



In connection with the annual report of Almaden Minerals Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),

I, Duane Poliquin, Chief Executive Officer of  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/Duane Poliquin



Name: Duane Poliquin

Title: Chief Executive Officer

March 27, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 37 (Wednesday, February 25, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 10094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03893]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit 
comments on the agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within twelve days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. A copy of the agreement is 
available through the Commission's Web site (www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1d696f7c79787c737c71646e746e5d7b707e337a726b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a1d5d3c0c5c4c0cfc0cdd8d2c8d2e1c7ccc28fc6ced7">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Agreement No.: 012288-001.
    Title: Hoegh/NYK Atlantic/Pacific Space Charter Agreement.
    Parties: Hoegh Autoliners AS and Nippon Yusen Kaisha.
    Filing Party: Joshua Stein, Esq.; Cozen O'Connor; 1627 I Street 
NW., Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006.
    Synopsis: The amendment adds the trade between the U.S. West Coast, 
on the one hand, and China, South Korea, and Japan, on the other hand, 
to the geographic scope of the agreement, revises the duration of the 
agreement, changes the name of the agreement to reflect the new 
geographic scope, and restates the agreement.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

    Dated: February 20, 2015.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-03893 Filed 2-24-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Will of Carney: Carney, Appellant, vs. Carney, Respondent.

*May 13*

June *5, 1908.*

*Wills: Undue influence: .Evidence.*

A finding by tlie trial court that a will was tlie product of undue influence on tlie part of tlie sole devisee is *held*to be sustained by tbe evidence.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: J. 0. Ludwig, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Eor the appellant there was a brief by *Miller, Made & Fairchild,*and oral argument by A. 17. *Fairchild.*

*Joseph Q. Donnelly,*for the respondent.

Wiwslow, C. J.

This is a will contest. The testatrix, Mary E. Carney, a widow somewhat more than seventy years of age, died at her residence in Milwaukee, December 23, 1904, leaving four adult sons surviving, viz., Edward, *George, Franle,*and John. On the 16th day of the previous August she had executed a will leaving all of her property, consisting almost entirely of her homestead in Milwaukee, to *92her son *Frank.*This will was duly presented for probate, and objections were filed thereto by *George*on the ground that the testatrix was not of sound mind and that the will was the result of undue influence. The will was admitted to probate by the county court, but on appeal to the circuit court that court found in substance that while the deceased was not incompetent to make a will, still that she was so weak-minded and infirm as to be easily susceptible to undue influence, and that her son *Frank*occupied a position of trust and confidence with his mother and did in fact avail himself of his position and dominated her mind and unduly influenced her to execute the will in question in his favor. Upon these findings of fact the court reversed the order of the county court, and the proponent appeals.

The appeal presents simply the question whether the finding that the will was the product of undue influence on the part of *Frank*is supported by .the evidence. Much of the evidence on this question was circumstantial. We have carefully examined it and find ourselves unable to say that the finding is against the clear preponderance thereof. This result necessitates affirmance under familiar and well-settled rules. No attempt to state the details of the evidence would be useful.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed; contestant’s statutory costs in this court to be taxed and paid out of the estate.
# CE2004084EN.01009403.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/94 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/94

---

(2004/C 84 E/0123)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3731/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject:   Update concerning the funds for the SAVE II programme for the municipality of Terni

Subject:

With reference to question E-0973/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of Terni (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the SAVE II programme, the Commission replied on 25 April 2003 to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

1

Can the Commission state whether, since then and up to the present, it has received any SAVE II projects from that municipality?

Joint answer

to Written Questions E-3704/03, E-3705/03, E-3706/03, E-3707/03, E-3708/03, E-3709/03, E-3710/03, E-3711/03, E-3712/03, E-3713/03, E-3714/03, E-3715/03, E-3716/03, E-3717/03, E-3721/03, E-3722/03, E-3723/03, E-3724/03, E-3725/03, E-3726/03, E-3727/03, E-3728/03, E-3729/03, E-3730/03 and E-3731/03

given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(28 January 2004)

(28 January 2004)

The Commission informs the Honourable Member in the context of the 25 written questions with regard to the Communes of Ancona, Carrara, Firenze, Livorno, Macerata, Massa, Perugia, Pesaro, Pisa, Pistoia, Prato, Siena and Terni that Altener II and SAVE II both ended in 2002, so no more projects were invited and presented since April 2003.

With regard to written question E-3716/03, the city of Pistoia had submitted one proposal for the Altener II programme in the Calls for proposals 2001. This proposal ‘Resred’ did not succeed and was not granted support, because the independent experts' evaluation concluded that the proposal did not demonstrate sufficient European added value and replication potential, focussing on pre-feasibility studies mainly in Italian and Greek municipalities; in addition, other problems regarding the proposed approach, project team, budget, etc. led to the negative result.

---

(1)  OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

1

---
• 

USCIB: 5.3/29 

'!'OP SElem!l'i' = T:f. S. Ei¥l!e ONJ:i¥ 

.. 

M'PBNB5B B06UMEfi'fS OON'fAilf 

00BE•UORB M:ld!!lftikL 

7 April 1954 

M]MORANDUM FOR THE Ml!MBERS OF USCIBEC: 

Subject: Tentative Minutes. 

1. Forwarded herewith is a copy of the Tentative Minutes of 

the Thirteenth Meeting of USCIBEC. Please advise the Secretary if 

any changes are desired. 

2. In the event there is no objection to these Minutes on the 

part of USCIBEC members by 22 April 1954 they will be considered 

approved. 

• I 3 I :.r/5"3 - Cl-' cf. - 102 ~ . 

13 ' '/?D - I\ I' 

Enclosure 

1 copy of Tentative Minutes, 

Thirteenth Meeting of USCIBEC. 

REPRODUCTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IN WHOLE OR 

PART IS PROHIBITED EXCEPT WITH PERMISSION 

OF THE ISSUING OFFICE. 

~w-f" tiv~ 

.rt~IA.41 - 1'"3.'1/1.S-

~ - '/. J./1 (, 

3 - /3,7/, 

"! - J'/11/-21> 

6- - ;l./ ,/1e. 

B - 1~.t/1(, 

1\PPiiNE>EB B081:JMli:iN!S SON!AlN 

60BE•WORtl M:A:'f Eftl:ltL 

USCIB: 5.3/29 

T0-...0 SECRET 

eclassifi ed and a roved for release b NSA on 11-06-2014 ursuant to E .0. 1352 

31 
• 

• 

~~t...JAtirM,7 62 7 bUI h ILICI '111"\L. 

60NFIBEfi'l'Ltti - e.s. ED:5 ONLY 

PRESl!NT: 

DEFENSE: 

STATE: 

m= 

!§!: 

.QI!: 

!!11: 

~: 

AIR FORCE: 

SECRETARIAT: 

AISO PRESENT: 

DEFENSE: 

CIA: 

-

ARMY: 

-

MINUTF.s OF THE THIRTEENTH MEETING 

OF THE 

USCIB EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 

Captain Rufus L. Taylor. USN. Chairman 

Mr. Randolph V. Zander 

(for Mr. William H. Godel) 

Mr. Robert F. Packa~d 

(for Mr. T. Achilles Polyzoides) 

Mr. Victor P. Keay 

Captain Dwight M. Agnew, USN 

(:tor Mr. Huntington D. Sheldon) 

Lt. Colonel Glen C. Long 

Captain William M. McCormick 

Colonel Charles M. Townsend 

Mr. H. D. Jones 

Mrs. D. O. Tucker 

Mr. Milton S. Zaslow 

Mr. Philip J. Patton 

Mr. Benson K. Buffham 

Lt. Colonel :Edward E. McBride 

Major Amie L. Millican 

C0"'1'F/9ENTIAL 

OGA 
.. ~hfl,,Y~;ir~r7 62 7 """''"' 1uL..1" 1 1ru .. 

OONF'lBl!ffl'IAL - l:f .5. EDS ONLY 

AIR FORCE: 

COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN: 

Major J. Craig Teller 

Captain Allen T. Miller 

Major William R. Culmer, USA (Security) 

The Thirteenth Meeting of the United States Communications Intelligence 

Board Executive Conmdttee was held at 1400 on 26 March 1954, in Room 2054, 

Que Building, CIA. 

- 2 -

COHFIBE1~fl1'L
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 38 (Thursday, February 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 10497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03937]



[[Page 10497]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Eye Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, NEI Secondary Data Analysis (R21) Grant Applications.
    Date: March 18, 2015.
    Time: 2:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Brian Hoshaw, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Division of 
Extramural Research, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, Rockville, MD 
20892, 301-451-2020, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4c24233f242d3b2e0c212d252062222524622b233a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dcb4b3afb4bdabbe9cb1bdb5b0f2b2b5b4f2bbb3aa">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, 
Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 20, 2015.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-03937 Filed 2-25-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1285/2006 of 29 August 2006 opening the procedure for the allocation of export licences for cheese to be exported to the United States of America in 2007 under certain GATT quotas

(Official Journal of the European Union L 235 of 30 August 2006)

On page 11, in Annex II, first line:

for:

               ‘Identification of group and quota referred to in column 3 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1282/2006:’,

read:

               ‘Identification of group and quota referred to in column 3 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1285/2006:’,

and the second line:

for:

               ‘Name of group indicated in column 2 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1282/2006:’,

read:

               ‘Name of group indicated in column 2 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1285/2006:’.

On page 12, in Annex III, first line:

for:

               ‘Identification of group and quota referred to in column 3 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1282/2006:’,

read:

               ‘Identification of group and quota referred to in column 3 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1285/2006:’,

and the second line:

for:

               ‘Name of group indicated in column 2 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1282/2006:’,

read:

               ‘Name of group indicated in column 2 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1285/2006:’.

On page 13, in Annex IV, heading of first column:

for:

               ‘Identification of group and quota referred to in column 3 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1282/2006:’,

read:

               ‘Identification of group and quota referred to in column 3 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1285/2006:’.

----
# CE2004078EN.01086201.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/862 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/862

---

(2004/C 78 E/0916)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3837/03

by Emmanouil Bakopoulos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(12 December 2003)

Subject:   Privatisation of the Post Office Savings Bank

Subject:

Acting on behalf of the Greek government, the Greek Finance Minister, Mr Christodoulakis, has announced the decision to privatise the Post Office Savings Bank.

Has the Commission been informed about this matter by the Greek government?

Answer given by Mr Monti on behalf of the Commission

(30 January 2004)

(30 January 2004)

As regards privatisation, the Commission notes that Article 295 (ex-Article 222) of the EC Treaty guarantees the neutrality of the Community concerning public or private ownership of undertakings. There is no obligation for the Member States to inform the Commission of their intention to sell or to buy undertakings, nor does the Commission ever require or impede privatisation of public undertakings.

If the privatisation process involves the grant of State aids, Member States must inform the Commission in accordance with the notification requirement of Article 87(3) of the EC Treaty.

The Greek authorities have not informed the Commission so far of any intention to grant State aids in the framework of the privatisation of the Post Office Savings Bank.

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 12, 2024

No. 04-23-00394-CR

EX PARTE Ricardo TAPIA LOPEZ

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10797CR

Honorable Susan D. Reed, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS Ricardo Tapia Lopez’s 

appeal of the denial of his application for pretrial writ of habeas corpus for want of jurisdiction. 

We further consider Tapia Lopez’s appeal as a petition for writ of mandamus and DENY his 

request for mandamus relief WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on June 12, 2024.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of June, 2024.

_____________________________

Luz Estrada, Chief Deputy Clerk
REF ID:A57969 • • 

2 0 JAN 1955 

Members 

1'.ROM: Cba~, Editorial Policy Board 

SUBJEari Second Meeting ot :NSA 'l'echnical Journa.l Editoria.l Polley J!oard - .Agenda.. 

1'be second meeting ot the Ed.itoria.l Policy Bea.rd will be held Friday, 

28 January 1955 at oBoo in the Sta:f'f' Conference Room, l9-2b..4. 

The Agenda 1s as f'ollows i 

1. Review and. approval ot the minutes of the tirst meeting ot the Bae.rd. 

2. Report by subcommittee appointed at lst meeting on 14 JezJ.ua;ey 1955· 

3. Review of qualif'ications desired in a Mariag1ng Editor p:1."ed.1cated 

on an examination of the tentative .job description, prepared by the SubcOD:lilittee, 

incl.uding: 

a. An expression ot feeling aa ·t;o whether these qualifications can 

best be mt by selection f'rom within or outside the J,sency. 

4. Discussion of the role of this Board, based on Dr. Shinn's work 

with the Subcommittee on the problem of working relationships of the Boe.rd 

and the Ma.raging Edi tor, to include: 

a. Its relationship to the responsibilities and authority of 

the Managing Editor. 

b. Placement of the review and approval authority relative to 

applications tor receipt of the Jov.rnaJ.. 

c. Tbs establishment of procedures a.nd responsibilities for tbe 

editorial. review of articles submitted f'or publishing in the Jourm.J.. 

5. Discussion of the means to stimulate people to prepare a.rticl.es for 

publ.1sh:l.:ne; in the Jourml., to include: 

a. Clarirication ot the question of vbere and on whose time such 

articles should. be prepm!d. 

6. Discussion in broe.d terms ot the types of ti tlea and sub3ect mtter 

that should be encouraged for use in the Journal. 

1.-r.U/&8~ f) ~ WILLIAM F o FRIEJIWI p-rr~ Che.irme.n 

NBA Technical. Journal Editorial. Policy Boa.rd 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 08-13-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a