alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

HEADQUARTERS 

SPACE SYSTEMS DIVISION 

AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND 

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE 

LOS ANGELES AIR FORCE STATION 

Air Force Unit Post Office, Los Angeles, California 90045 

ATTN OF: SSGS 

REPL Y TO 24 February 1965 

SUBJECT: Code for Manned Orbiting Laboratory (MOL) System Source Selection 

Board Report and Presentation 

Office of Secretary of the Air Force 

ATTN: Chairman, MOL Policy Council 

Washington 25, D. C. 

The following code was employed to identify individual offerors for 

the Manned Orbiting Laboratory preliminary design and analysis study 

effort. This code is applicable to both the Final Report and the 

Board Presentation. 

SSSB Final Report 

Code Contractor 

A Martin 

B Douglas 

C General Electric 

D Lockheed 

E Boeing 

F North American 

G General Dynamics 

C. MAXWELL 

,\Brig Gen, USAF 8393A 

\Chairman, MOL SSSB 

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 

0 9' 

TO:
# CE2004088EN.01049501.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/495 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/495

---

(2004/C 88 E/0507)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0318/04

by Glenys Kinnock (PSE) to the Commission

(6 February 2004)

Subject:   People with mental disabilities in Russia

Subject:

Is the Commission aware of the lack of legal protection for people with mental disabilities in Russia?

Would the Commission identify and clarify what action is being taken on behalf of these people and whether the matter has been raised at the highest possible level with the authorities?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(10 March 2004)

(10 March 2004)

According to information at the disposal of the Commission, the Russian Constitution does not directly address the issue of discrimination against persons with disabilities. In addition, although laws to prohibit discrimination do exist, it appears that these are not always adequately enforced.

The Commission has been working for several years via the Tacis programme to improve the treatment of the disabled in Russia. Examples of projects include: ‘Partnership in health, education and social assistance’, implemented as part of the 1999 Tacis Action Programme for Russia in cooperation with the Ministry of Education, which has promoted the early detection of disabilities and the better treatment of Russian children in several regions of Russia.

Further projects — to be implemented with Russian institutions including the Russian Ministry of Labour and Social Development — are currently being prepared.

These projects aim, inter alia, to:

| — | improve existing legislation; |
| --- | --- |

—

improve existing legislation;

| — | develop mechanisms of cooperation between different departments/agencies and organisations dealing with disabled children; |
| --- | --- |

—

develop mechanisms of cooperation between different departments/agencies and organisations dealing with disabled children;

| — | develop programmes for the social inclusion of children with disabilities and provide support to their families; |
| --- | --- |

—

develop programmes for the social inclusion of children with disabilities and provide support to their families;

| — | better train social workers, medical staff and teachers; |
| --- | --- |

—

better train social workers, medical staff and teachers;

| — | raise awareness of the rights of disabled children and their families, the problems which they experience and their contribution as valued members of society. |
| --- | --- |

—

raise awareness of the rights of disabled children and their families, the problems which they experience and their contribution as valued members of society.

The Commission has also provided support to a number of non-governmental organisations (NGOs), charities, parents' associations and religious organizations via its Civil Society Programme, with the aim of promoting better understanding and treatment of the disabled and in particular disabled children.

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement
of Prodigy Communications Corporation (the "Company") on Form S-8 of our report
appearing in Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement No. 333-64233 on Form S-1
of the Company, which report was dated April 30, 1998, except as to the
information presented under Additional Financing in Notes 8 and 11 for which the
date is September 21, 1998, and to the information presented under Restatement
of Financial Statements in Note 1 for which the date is January 22, 1999, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements of Prodigy Communications
Corporation as of December 31, 1996 and 1997 and for each of the two years in
the period ended December 31, 1997, and of our report dated September 10, 1998,
on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Prodigy Services
Company for the year ended December 31, 1995 and the five and one-half month
period ended June 16, 1996.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Boston, Massachusetts

February 11, 1999
,,. .... ~ 

REF ID:A59334 

SECiiET h.... 6 M~E . 

USCIB: l'J.5/87 

8 November 1954 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Physical Compromise of Codeword. 

USCIB Directive No. 9. 

1. A SECRET Codeword document originated by NSA, Control No. 

845-50, was reported lost at Vint Hill Farms Station,, Warrenton,, 

Virginia. I 

2. Findings of a board of officers, appoint~d to invest~gate 

the reported loss, indicate that: 

a. The do~ument, Interim Report NSA-90 #84-54 dated 

15 Februa:ry 1954 (Control No. 845-50) classified SECRET Codeword, 

disappeared between the hours 0800 and 1530 on 24 March 1954 while 

under the responsibility o.f Sgt. Robert F. Snyder. 

b. The supervisor, even though required to sign a certificate of accountability and responsibility, had little or no control 

of the documents. 

3. Although the board of officers who investigated the loss did 

not specifica~ly find that subject document was burned, \VOJG Nicholls, 

who as watch officer was responsible for burning trash from 0800 to 

1530 on 24 March 1954, pointed out that it was highly possible for the 

document to have been placed into the incinerator unnQticed. 

4. The board recommended that: 

a. Subject document dated 15 February 1954, classified SECREr 

Codeword be considered compromised. 

b. Sgt. Robert F. Snyder,! ~ be held :responsible 

for the loss ot the docum~nt. 

c. The ~atch " Officers be made responsible for all documents 

used by the operating tricks on a 24-hour basis, All documents be 

receipted for fr~ watch officer to watch officer and retained by or 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-10-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

USCIB: 13.5/87 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

SECRET.AMBLE. 
USCIB: 13.5/87 

SiSSBEF AUi:U.: 

8 November 1954 

Subject: Physical Compromise of Codeword. 

released from the watch officer on hand receipt for the period of time 

required for actual use. This should prevent a recurrence of the loss 

of a document. In the past the supervisor, even though required to 

sign a certificate of responsibility and accountability, has had little 

or no control over the documents since they are used in more than one 

room in the building, by more than one person, and in many cases by 

personnel senior in grade to the person held responsible. 

d. All reference documents be placed in fiber or metal covers 

to reduce the possibility of inadvertent destruction. 

5. The Director, National Security Agency, has advised that he 

concurs with the findings and recommendations and co~siders the 

material involved compromised. He also considers the corrective action 

taken satisfactory. 

6. The above brief of subject compromise and action taken thereon 

is circulated for information in lieu of the complete report of the 

board of investigation. Should, however, any member desire the complete report, it is on file in the office of the Executive Secretary, 

USCIB, and will be made available on request. 

USCIB: 13.5/87 - 2 -

aptain, U. S. Navy 

ecutive Secretary, USCIB
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HEI, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended November 29, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mack V. Traynor, Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley AcT of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                      /s/ Mack V. Traynor, III
                                      ---------------------------------
                                      Mack V. Traynor, III
                                      Chief Executive Officer and President

Date: January 13, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to HEI, Inc. and will be retained by HEI, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2



ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned officer of ZOLL Medical Corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies that, to my knowledge, the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended October 2, 2005 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be a part of the
Report or filed for any purpose whatsoever.



|                        |  |  |  |       |  |                      |  |                                                                               
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----- |  | -------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: December 15, 2005 |  |  |  | Name: |  | /s/ A. Ernest Whiton
|                        |  |  |  |       |  |                      |  | A. Ernest Whiton, Vice President of Administration and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION



The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:



(1)

The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  May 14, 2008 | /s/ Kenneth W. Brimmer 
|------------------- | -----------------------
|                    | Chief Executive Officer



|Date:  May 14, 2008 | /s/ Mark Buckrey       
|------------------- | -----------------------
|                    | Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.7
 
                                    CONSENT
 
  I hereby consent to the reference to me in the Schedule 14A of XTRA
Corporation (the "Company") and in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus forming a
part of the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of the Company relating to the
merger of Wheels MergerCo LLC ("MergerCo"), a newly organized Delaware limited
liability company formed solely for the purpose of consummating the
transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger and
Recapitalization, dated as of June 18, 1998, as amended and restated as of
July 31, 1998, between the Company and MergerCo, with and into the Company.
 
 
                                                   /s/ Raoul Witteveen
                                          -------------------------------------
                                                     Raoul Witteveen
 
October 20, 1998
 
 
                                       1
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1482 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 146
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1482

 To improve and reauthorize provisions relating to the application of 
     the antitrust laws to the award of need-based educational aid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 2, 2015

   Mr. Grassley (for himself, Mr. Leahy, and Mr. Lee) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

                              July 9, 2015

              Reported by Mr. Grassley, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To improve and reauthorize provisions relating to the application of 
     the antitrust laws to the award of need-based educational aid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Need-Based Educational Aid Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION RELATING TO THE APPLICATION OF THE ANTRITRUST LAWS TO 
              THE AWARD OF NEED-BASED EDUCATIONAL AID.

    Section 568 of the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994 (15 
U.S.C. 1 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``or'' after the 
                semicolon;
                    (B) in paragraph (3), by striking ``; or'' and 
                inserting a period at the end; and
                    (C) by striking paragraph (4); and
            (2) in subsection (d), by striking ``2015'' and inserting 
        ``2022''.
                                                       Calendar No. 146

114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1482

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To improve and reauthorize provisions relating to the application of 
     the antitrust laws to the award of need-based educational aid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              July 9, 2015

                       Reported without amendment
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-7167

MICHAEL DWAYNE ROGERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHRIS RICH; JUDGE BETTY BROWN,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; ERIC HOOKS; 

WENDELL JACKSON,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:19-cv-00417-WO-JLW)

Submitted: February 29, 2024 Decided: March 22, 2024

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Dwayne Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. James Trachtman, Assistant Attorney General, 

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7167 Doc: 14 Filed: 03/22/2024 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7167 Doc: 14 Filed: 03/22/2024 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Michael Dwayne Rogers, a North Carolina inmate, commenced this action alleging 

violations of his rights under the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause and the 

Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc to 

2000cc-5. On the magistrate judge’s recommendation, the district court granted summary 

judgment to Defendants Chris Rich and Betty Brown. Rogers appeals.

On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th 

Cir. R. 34(b). Although Rogers’ informal brief disputes the district court’s determination 

that Rogers’ right to practice his religion was not substantially burdened, the informal brief 

does not meaningfully challenge the court’s conclusion that the prison policies at issue 

were the least restrictive means of furthering a compelling governmental interest. See

Greenhill v. Clarke, 944 F.3d 243, 250 (4th Cir. 2019) (stating elements of RLUIPA claim). 

As a result, Rogers has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. 

Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; 

under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7167 Doc: 14 Filed: 03/22/2024 Pg: 3 of 3
Amend. No. 2 to the RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. Non-Employee Director Stock Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 
 TO THE 
 RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD. 
 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK PLAN 

This Amendment No. 2 (the “Amendment”) to the RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. Non-Employee Director Stock Plan, as amended and restated
effective June 1, 2002, and further amended on February 28, 2007 (the “Plan”), is made effective as of this 9th day of May 2008. 
 WHEREAS, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (the “Company”) maintains the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant
to Section 9 of the Plan, the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Committee”) has the authority to amend the Plan and believes it to be in the best interests of the Company to
do so; and 
 WHEREAS, the Committee has determined it to be in the best interests of the Company to permit participants to exercise options
under the Plan by means of a “net exercise” procedure; and 
 WHEREAS, the Committee has authorized the undersigned officer to
execute this Amendment. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	By deleting the word “and” from immediately prior to item (iv) of Section 7.6 of the Plan. 

  

	 	2.	By renumbering current item (iv) of Section 7.6 of the Plan as item (v) of Section 7.6. 

  

	 	3.	By inserting as item (iv) of Section 7.6 of the Plan the following language: by delivery to the Company of a notice of “net exercise” pursuant to which the
Participant shall receive the number of Shares underlying the Options so exercised reduced by the number of Shares equal to the aggregate exercise price set for the Options divided by the Fair Market Value of the Shares on the date of exercise, and


 Except as modified by this Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain valid and in full force and
effect. 
 *    *    * 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Company, has executed this
instrument as of the 9th day of May 2008, on behalf of the Committee. 
  

			
	RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Stephen H. Weinstein

	Name:	 	Stephen H. Weinstein
	Title:	 	SVP and Corporate Secretary


  

 - 2 -
y 24 

USCIB: 9 • 2/19 

13 December 1954 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

MEMORANDUJ:~ FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: 

USCIB: 9. 2/19 

COMINT Capability to Provide Farly Waming of CHICCM 

Attack on Formosa and the Off-Shore Islands. 

ptain, U. • Navy 

.L:&A.,,li.w.loilll"ive Secretary, USCIB
Jllr. John Hoard 

3l4 t{~ i.oC 

5pr1Jlif'1eld, .Delaware County 

Pennsylvania 

near Johu: 

9APR 1952 

I learned. vi th soae dismq aboa t y.,ur appl.;ying a.t ta ptetiouae 

tor admission to HCS on the ~ of l Apr.ll am ot J'UV being 

delqed beyond the U..e you ha4 available. l vish J'OU had phoned 'tlr. 

Caapa.i..gne or me juat betor• 70u.r appeu-anc-e at. the gateno-u.M, but you 

perhaps figUZ'ed tttat ve had e....,.t.n.tng •1.AWi •"' Eor SCjJ.l _.ers or ~ yau just d.id not nave the opp('rturdty to phone in advance. At 

aiq- rate,. I apolog.t.se tor th.e W.~t JOU receiTaf. imd assure you 

that w are doing all in our pcuer to i.a•n that this 111.U nat happen 

api.n to aZJ.¥ SCAC .._ber. admiral. Jenger Joina vi itll • ia apolod.d.ng 

to you.. 

We m.saed. the cbance to Wk to you.,, and hope that the next. U. 

you ~1&Te the opport.urdty to stop in )'Ou will do so"' eYen if it. ia 

onl)r to sq hello. 

1'1.i oFriaiman/eby/8 Apr S2 

00'1'/Rm. 1923213/SKt. 6U493 

@'pp roved for Release bv NSA on 04-15-2014 pursuant to E .0. 1352\3
EXHIBIT 11



BAIRNCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED APRIL 5, 2003 AND MARCH 30, 2002

(Unaudited)





|                                                                                             | 2003             | 2002            
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------- | ----------------
|BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:                                                             |                  |                 
|                                                                                             |                  |                 
|Net income                                                                                   | $     889,000    | $     681,000   
|Average common shares outstanding                                                            | 7,334,000        | 7,329,000       
|Basic Earnings Per Common Share                                                              | $           0.12 | $           0.09
|                                                                                             |                  |                 
|DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:                                                           |                  |                 
|                                                                                             |                  |                 
|Net income                                                                                   | $      889,000   | $      681,000  
|Average common shares outstanding                                                            | 7,334,000        | 7,329,000       
|Common shares issuable in respect to options issued      to employees with a dilutive effect | 2,000            | 5,000           
|Total diluted common shares outstanding                                                      | 7,336,000        | 7,334,000       
|Diluted Earnings Per Common Share                                                            | $           0.12 | $           0.09
|                                                                                             |                  |                 





#