alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Maxwell Shoe Company Inc.


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Maxwell Shoe 
Company Inc. as of October 31, 1997 and 1998, and the related consolidated 
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended October 31, 1998. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to 
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing 
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present 
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Maxwell
Shoe Company Inc. at October 31, 1997 and 1998, and the consolidated results of 
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period 
ended October 31, 1998 in conformity with generally accepted accounting 
principles.




                                              ERNST & YOUNG LLP



December 16, 1998
                                        
<PAGE>
 
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
(Form S-8 No. 33-83438 and Form S-8 No. 333-55723) pertaining to the 1994 Stock 
Incentive Plan of Maxwell Shoe Company Inc. of our report dated December 16, 
1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Maxwell Shoe 
Company Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
October 31, 1998.

Our audits also included the consolidated financial statement schedule of 
Maxwell Shoe Company Inc. listed in Item 14(a)(2). This schedule is the 
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an 
opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the consolidated financial 
statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic 
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects 
the information set forth therein.



                                                       ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
January 18, 1999
Exhibit (32)(1)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of C-COR Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 24, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Woodle, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|/s/ DAVID A. WOODLE                                
|David A. Woodle Chief Executive Officer May 3, 2006
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3
 
              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
As independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of
our report (and to all references to our firm) included in or made a part of
this registration statement.
 
                                          /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
   
January 6, 1998     
 Orlando, Florida
Exhibit 23.9





Consent of Vincent Jourdain





I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of North American Palladium Ltd., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of references to my name and references to my involvement in the preparation of technical information relating to the Sleeping Giant mine, Quebec, included in the 2010 Annual Information Form of North American Palladium Ltd., dated March 31, 2011 (the “AIF”).





I also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-13766) and in the Registration Statements on Form F-10 and amendments thereto (File Nos. 333-158082 and 333-164512) of the references to my name and the above-mentioned information in the AIF.





Dated this 31st day of March, 2011.





Name:
/s/ Vincent JourdainVincent Jourdain, P.Eng.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 11.1


                                   CNET, Inc.
                STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE



                                           Year ended December 31
                                --------------------------------------------
                                    1996            1995            1994
                                ------------    ------------    ------------


Net Loss                        $(16,948,662)   $( 8,607,358)   $( 2,826,549)
                                ------------    ------------    ------------
                                ------------    ------------    ------------
 Weighted average shares
   outstanding during the period:
 Preferred                         2,869,281       5,707,204       3,944,903
 Common                            7,963,897       2,700,000       2,700,000

 Shares issued and stock option
   and warrants granted in
   accordance with
   SAB No. 83                        406,637         808,841         808,841



 Shares used in calculating per  -----------      ----------      -----------
   share data                     11,239,815       9,216,045       7,453,744
                                 -----------      ----------      -----------
                                 -----------      ----------      -----------
 Net loss per share                 $  (1.51)       $  (0.93)       $  (0.38)
                                 -----------      ----------      -----------
                                 -----------      ----------      -----------
U.S. Deportment of Transportation Federal Aviation Adm inistration



### SEP 

### 0 l 2015

Ms. Patricia Apone Office of Airport Safety and Standards

Director, Horry County Department

of Airports 1 100 Jetport Road Myrtle Beach, SC 29577 Dear Ms. Apone: 800 Independence Ave ., SW Washington , DC 2059 1

We are writing to express our concerns about the safety of skydiving operations at the Grand Stands Airport (CRE). Between March 2013 and August 20 1 5, the FAA Air Traffic Control Tower (A T CT) and the Horry County D epartment of Airports (HCDA), in South Caro lina have reported approximately 91 safety incidents involving skydiving operations at the Airport. These incidents involving Vehicle Pedestrian Deviations , Major Occurrence Reports, and Unusual Incident Reports bring into question Horry County's current compliance with its obligation to operate CRE in a safe manner, which includes the Drop Zone (DZ) on airport property. As you know, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is currently reviewing a 14 CFR Part 16 Complaint filed by Skydive Myrtle Beach, Inc
. (Complainant) against HCDA, South Caro lina, under FAA Docket No. 16

- 14-05. The pleadings in the Part 16 complaint raise the question of whether the County should restrict skydiving operations to assure safe operations of CRE and exercise greater control of the airport to preclude unsafe conditions

. While the issues raised by the pleadings are being addressed in the current FAA investigation, and are not being prejudged by this letter, the FAA urges CRE to consider whether immediate steps should be taken to mitigate unsafe skydiving practices at CRE and the risks imposed upon other airport users , within the context of overall airfield safety. These safety incidents may be indicative ofserious systemic safety issues involving skydiving operations (e.g., landings outside of the Drop Zone) at CRE. You should give serious considera tion to mitigation measures such as better coordination with the ATCT because they may const itute unacceptable risks at the Airport. From a safety and compliance perspective, we strongly encourage the County to use its authority to ensure safe on-airport skydiving landings , to include the DZ.2 The FAA 's Airports (ARP), Air Traffic Organization (ATO), and Flight Standards (AFS) offices stand ready to assist in identifying appropriate risk mitigation measures. Please let me know if I can be of assistance in answering any questions you may have. t

Michael J. O'D ell, A.A.E. Di rector ofAirport Safety and Standards
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A0 07 3 . KNEZ EVI C et a l . v . SCBT.

It ap p eari n g t h at t h e p art i es t o t h is ap p eal h av e r e s o l ved al l i s s u es b et ween

t h em an d i t f

u r t h er ap p eari n g t h at i n t h e tri al co u rt t h e A PPELLANTS h av e

wi t h d rawn an d d is m i s s e d w i t h p reju d ice an y an d al l cl ai m s

, m o t i o ns or ap p eal s

p en di n g b el o w rel at i ng to APPELLANTS’ “ A p p eal to Ord er t o M o t i o n t o Set As i d e

J u d g em en t b y D e f

au lt an d Am en d ed M o t i on t o Set As i d e Defau lt J u dg m en t ,” t h e

ap p eal i n t he ab o v e-s t y l ed cas e i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 11/03/2015 November 03, 2015
# CE2004078EN.01061801.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/618 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/618

---

(2004/C 78 E/0653)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3645/03

by Salvador Jové Peres (GUE/NGL) and Pedro Marset Campos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(9 December 2003)

Subject:   European Union/Morocco agreement

Subject:

At a conference held in Almeria on 24 October 2003, a Commission official acknowledged that the fruit and vegetables imported from Morocco to European markets had on a number of occasions exceeded the quotas laid down by the association agreement. He specifically acknowledged that Morocco had imported into Europe quantities of tomatoes and courgettes in excess of the authorised quotas. According to press reports, he explained that the new courgette quota negotiated with Morocco was nothing new and posed no threat to producers in south-eastern Spain, since Morocco had previously been importing similar quantities illegally, and the impact on the market would go unnoticed.

If the Commission was aware that import quotas were being exceeded, why did it take no action? Following the renewal of the EU/Morocco association agreement, how will it monitor compliance with these quotas? What action will it take if the quotas are exceeded?

---
EXHIBIT 21.1

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF CORNELL CORRECTIONS, INC.
                            (AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               PERCENTAGE OF VOTING
                                                 PERCENTAGE OF VOTING          SECURITIES OWNED BY A
                                             SECURITIES OWNED BY CORNELL            SUBSIDIARY
                                                  CORRECTIONS, INC.         OF CORNELL CORRECTIONS, INC.
                                             ----------------------------   ----------------------------              
<S>                                                      <C>                           <C> 
Cornell Corrections of North America, Inc.               100%

Cornell Corrections Management, Inc.                     100%                          100%
  Cornell Corrections of Texas, Inc.                                                   100%
  Cornell Corrections of California, Inc.                                              100%
  Cornell Corrections of Rhode Island, Inc.                                            100%
  Abraxas Group, Inc.                                                                  100%
  WBP Leasing, Inc.                                                                    100%
  Cornell Corrections of Oklahoma, Inc.                                                100%
  Cornell Corrections of Georgia, L.P.                                                 100%
CCGI Corporation                                         100%


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Supreme Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 2, 2011 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

 
| DATE:   May 17, 2011 | /s/   Matthew W. Long     |
|---------------------------|---------------------------|
|                      | Matthew   W. Long         |
|                      | Chief   Financial Officer |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<CIK>           0000351129
<NAME>          CDX Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>    1
<CURRENCY>      U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>              <C>              <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS            6-MOS            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1998      JUN-30-1998      JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998      OCT-01-1997      JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1998      DEC-31-1997      SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1                1                1
<CASH>                               14,702           14,361            3,156
<SECURITIES>                              0                0                0 
<RECEIVABLES>                        26,808           26,569           41,055 
<ALLOWANCES>                           (777)            (627)            (477)
<INVENTORY>                          40,690           40,273           47,101 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     88,423           89,825          106,908
<PP&E>                              189,442          189,442          188,517  
<DEPRECIATION>                     (171,481)        (171,130)        (169,993)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      201,510          206,502          222,337   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                75,598           81,523          691,455
<BONDS>                                   0                0                0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               266,743          266,743                0
<PREFERRED>                               0                0                0
<COMMON>                             62,082           62,082           48,881  
<OTHER-SE>                                0                0                0 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        201,510          206,502          222,336
<SALES>                             182,784          118,203           56,616
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    182,534          117,954           56,366  
<CGS>                                54,793           34,271           14,414  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       162,303           99,018           45,194 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     17,538           17,721           11,996 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0                0                0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   12,768           12,768            7,273  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      12,234           11,121            8,622
<INCOME-TAX>                              0                0                0  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       0                0                0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0                0                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0                0                0
<CHANGES>                                 0                0                0
<NET-INCOME>                         12,234           11,121            8,622  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          .003            (.003)           (.002)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0                0                0
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1216 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1216

 To amend the Natural Gas Act to modify a provision relating to civil 
                               penalties.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 6, 2015

 Ms. Murkowski introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Natural Gas Act to modify a provision relating to civil 
                               penalties.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DE NOVO REVIEW OF CIVIL PENALTIES UNDER THE NATURAL GAS ACT.

    Section 22(b) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717t-1(b)) is 
amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: ``, in 
accordance with the same provisions as are applicable under section 
31(d) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 823b(d)) in the case of civil 
penalties assessed under section 31 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 
823b)''.
                                 <all>
```
• 

:?4 

USCIB: JJ+./S 

10 May 1954 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE ME:MBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Sale of Electronic Equipment to Soviet Bloc. 

Reference: USCIB 14./7, dated 4 May 1954• 

The following, vrhich has been received from SUSLO, London, in informal 

repl:y to the Enclosure lvith the referenc~ 

RmzR@YG'fiON OF '£IEES BOS'CHN'l' Ill WIIOtiB 

OR P:.\R'.t' IB PROHIBI~ EX;G§>tp WI't'II 

flffitlt!BS!OM OF TH!!: !SStr.l:NG Oll'l"ICE. 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

USCIB: 11+./S 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-05-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

'FOP SECRET
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<MULTIPLIER>                 1
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>               JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                 JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                       879813
<SECURITIES>                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                50260
<ALLOWANCES>                 0
<INVENTORY>                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             930073
<PP&E>                       30995053
<DEPRECIATION>               30301924
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               1623202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        215564
<BONDS>                      0
<COMMON>                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>        0
<PREFERRED>                  0
<OTHER-SE>                   1407638
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 1623202
<SALES>                      420338
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             420338
<CGS>                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>           0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>              230691
<INCOME-TAX>                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>          230691
<DISCONTINUED>               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>              0
<CHANGES>                    0
<NET-INCOME>                 230691
<EPS-PRIMARY>                .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                .00


</TABLE>
USCIB: 29.19/19 

MEMQRANDUM FOR THE :MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

ltE':t:'l!:N!Jlm noetn:imMS OOM!l\IN 

O OBEWORB M-A'fHRIA:b 

24 March 1955 

'EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Subject: CCMINT Relations with I .... ___ __. 

References: (a) USCIB 29.19/13 of/6 Decemberl954. 

(b) USCIB 29.19/17 of 20 Januaryl955 •. 

1. Reference (a) reported .c· e .. ··rtain recommendatio··· ~.·.t\~~·· .. o~ :SCI!C with regard to a :proposed Third Party arrangement withj__ _ __ _ In ef'f'eot, 

reference (a) left the matter in status quo (exce o app oval of a 

site survey) pending agreement between the National Security Agency 

ai1d the Central Intelligence Agency on the extent.of CCMINT training 

t:1at could be provided/by the U.S. tol I Reference (b) quotes 

ru.1 exchange of views.between USCIB and LSIB on subject relations. In 

that exchange it was agreed, amongst other things, that the Director, 

NSA would reach agreement with the Director, GGHQ on\a definition 

o::= a common UKUSA. standard of guidance and release of' information to 

the I las well as on an interpretation of the\ elementaJjY 

aspects of CCMINT training considereq appropriate forl ~ 

2. In the enclosure herewith the Director, NSA reports on his 

discussions with the Director, GGHQ and presents for the concurrance 

of the members of USCIB a summary of his views on future courses of 

u.s. action on the subject of CCMINT relations withl L 

3. It is requested that the members indicate their views with 

regard to the enclosure by executing the attached vote sheet and 

returning same to this office by the close of business Friday, 1 

April 1955. 

E'..iclosure 

USA stumna.ry, TSC 

NO. 550599-B 

USCIB: 29.19/19 

TOP SECRET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-14-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

24
99-570.

#### DeRolph v. State.

Perry C.P. No. 22043. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal of right from the Court of Common of Perry County. The record in this cause was filed on June 21,1999.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that the parties shall brief this case in accordance with S.CtPrac.R. VI and comply with S.CtPrac.R. VII and all other applicable rules of practice.