alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1980

KIRK CHAPPELL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, Local 

Union 772,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

SCOTT FULMER,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. 

(3:14-cv-02153-MGL)

Submitted: March 22, 2016 Decided: April 19, 2016

Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kirk Chappell, Appellant Pro Se. Lucas Robert Jason Aubrey, 

Victoria Louise Bor, SHERMAN DUNN COHEN LEIFER & YELLIG, PC, 

Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kirk Chappell appeals the district court’s order granting 

summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Chappell’s claims 

of negligence and breach of contract. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Chappell v. Int’l 

Bhd. of Elec. Workers, No. 3:14-cv-02153-MGL (D.S.C. July 31, 

2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1592 

To clarify the description of certain Federal land under the Northern Arizona 

Land Exchange and Verde River Basin Partnership Act of 2005 to 

include additional land in the Kaibab National Forest. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 17, 2015 

Mr. FLAKE (for himself and Mr. MCCAIN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To clarify the description of certain Federal land under the 

Northern Arizona Land Exchange and Verde River Basin 

Partnership Act of 2005 to include additional land in 

the Kaibab National Forest. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION RELATING TO A CERTAIN 

4 LAND DESCRIPTION UNDER THE NORTHERN 

5 ARIZONA LAND EXCHANGE AND VERDE 

6 RIVER BASIN PARTNERSHIP ACT OF 2005. 

7 Section 104(a)(5) of the Northern Arizona Land Ex8 change and Verde River Basin Partnership Act of 2005 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1592 IS

1 (Public Law 109–110; 119 Stat. 2356) is amended by in2 serting before the period at the end ‘‘, which, notwithstanding section 102(a)(4)(B), includes the N1⁄2, NE1 3 ⁄4, 

SW1⁄4, SW1⁄4, the N1⁄2, N1⁄2, SE1⁄4, SW1⁄4, and the N1 4 ⁄2, 

N1⁄2, SW1⁄4, SE1 5 ⁄4, sec. 34, T. 22 N., R. 2 E., Gila and 

6 Salt River Meridian, Coconino County, comprising ap7 proximately 25 acres’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NRO Honors Former SECDEF Robert 

McNamara

May 12, 2000 

The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) presented former Secretary of Defense Robert S. 

McNamara with the organization's highest award, the NRO Medal of Distinguished 

Performance. Mr. McNamara received the award in recognition of his lasting and critical 

contributions to the nation's intelligence capabilities. 

Mr. Keith Hall, NRO Director, presented McNamara with the award during ceremonies at NRO 

headquartes in Chantilly, VA on May 10. The NRO is celebrating its 40th Anniversary year 

through a series of events between September 2000 and 2001. McNamara established the 

National Reconnaissance Program and the NRO while serving as Secretary of Defense. 

"He recognized the critical importance of overhead reconnaissance and empowered the NRO to 

take on the extraordinary technical challenges that it presented," said Keith Hall during the award 

ceremony. "As a result, the NRO became a risk-taking organization that continues to lead the 

world in unparalleled technological innovations and capabilities."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Electronic
Processing, Inc. Statement of Income for years ended December 31, 1998 and
Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         344,940
<SECURITIES>                                 9,377,678
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,953,319
<PP&E>                                       1,225,891
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,477
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,143,733
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          886,646
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,127
<COMMON>                                        40,028
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,215,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,143,733
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,535,358
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,838,130)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (5,838,130)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,838,130)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.83)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>                     <C>
<RESTATED>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996             JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                      10,218,152               6,617,456
<SECURITIES>                                         0              25,539,606
<RECEIVABLES>                                  310,633                 419,225
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,467,671              32,971,324
<PP&E>                                         861,816                 836,875
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,467,671              32,971,324
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,467,991               5,535,897
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,814,000                       0
<PREFERRED>                                     19,298                       0
<COMMON>                                           351                  13,145
<OTHER-SE>                                  66,096,919              28,382,332
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,392,085              34,246,961
<SALES>                                      1,565,052               2,455,481
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,565,052               2,455,481
<CGS>                                          466,851                 949,403
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,428,113                 949,403
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0               6,830,685
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,036                  43,509
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,810,581)             (4,858,320)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,810,581)             (4,858,320)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,810,581)             (4,858,320)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.21)<F1>              (0.37)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.21)                  (0.37)
<FN>
<F1>For Purposes of This Exhibit, Primary means Basic.
</FN>


</TABLE>
----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 08/10/2010 06:34 PM

----- |------------> | From: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | To: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov, "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Cc: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |Fred Talcott/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Horowitz/DC/USEPA/US@EPA | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Date: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |08/06/2010 04:09 PM | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Subject: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |4SRB data | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------|

Cortney and Christine, See the sheet called "4SRB-Top 12%" in the attached spreadsheet. We looked at the skewness and the kurtosis to determine normal distribution. The loads ranged from 36%-74%. (See attached file: Existing SI RICE NESHAP MACT Floors 8-6-10.xls)

Melanie King Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711 Phone: (919) 541-2469 Fax: (919) 541-5450 king.melanie@epa.gov
Exhibit 32.1

                               AXA FINANCIAL, INC.

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008 of AXA Financial, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher M.
Condron, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                  /s/  Christopher M. Condron
                                  -------------------------------------
                                  Christopher M. Condron
                                  President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  March 13, 2009
National Reconnaissance Office Release #03-21

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Aug. 9, 2021

Office of Public Affairs

Contact: (703) 808-5050

NRO welcomes new deputy director in a change of command ceremony 

CHANTILLY, Va. – National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) Director Chris Scolese 

welcomed Maj. Gen. Donna D. Shipton as the new NRO deputy director and 

commander of the Space Force Element. Shipton replaced Maj. Gen. Michael Guetlein

in a change of command ceremony today at the NRO’s Westfields headquarters.

“We are honored to have Major General Shipton join the NRO team, bringing her nearly

30 years of outstanding Air Force leadership and career experience,” said Dr. Scolese. 

“Her skills gained in previous NRO operational assignments—and across years of

space and aircraft acquisition—will be essential as we continue to focus on future NRO 

innovations and missions.”

Shipton’s most recent assignment was director of strategic plans, programs,

requirements and analyses at Headquarters Air Force Materiel Command at WrightPatterson Air Force Base in Ohio. 

Guetlein was recently confirmed by the U.S. Senate for promotion to Lt. Gen., and

assigned as the first commander U.S. Space Force, Space Systems Command, Los 

Angeles Air Base, California.

###

For sixty years, the NRO has developed, acquired, launched, and operated the architecture that 

is the foundation for America’s advantage and strength in space. Using a diversified architecture

of spacecraft—different sizes and orbits—NRO collects and delivers the best space-based 

intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance content on the planet. Its customers include 

every member of the Intelligence Community, Department of Defense, two dozen domestic 

agencies, warfighters, decision-makers, and policymakers. Learn more at nro.gov.
.. ,., ... 

• 

REF ID:A45382 

•ms• 9f DE"" Mt 

2' ...... £ '"' 

'/\/'' 

./i .J-- (_~j . 1' ,'/! .. • 

1. QtrnpUea tt "-M• o( Stz "'d'" ... w..... It.a 6, '119 Cblet 

ot tlrilt i.u.ato17 ana.t&, Mt Gld.et ot ta. hwlepMll\ llnDoll 1l&a beea cleaigMW 

a s1._ et ti. oomtt'9e to 4raw ap a pl.u tor Clftl c..n..or.ldp ta Ja.Jl&ll• 

-a. nn 'm'Mi " IVrm•t • The Auinaat CoaVoJ. atttoer a"9aled tm -uaa tor \Ile pupoa ., JlllN ... Ursc a prooec1.ve for at11Q1Jac the nllba\llll ot 

per._l utd ~ \lie naaUea ot tile 8raU1l Chida '9 ncdl a ......--.. !M pl.aa u ..U.1mct woalcl ~ \he W.u\rat1oa ot opuattcmal prea1·4ufta ta * i.. of faft1allll1 tlew ellana, lnca1:111H.1111 it poesia1.e, ti. _.r am 1 ... ... tioa et ,.~. n •• pddect cmt \ha\ ncda a p1.u Id.pt a1ap11f.r \Iii .. ... 

par1-. UODC lz'uobll• wit.la nQHt to perwl utillatloa. Calwl Coot ...-n.a tbat ..a et the lnnoh C!aWa lhllm.t rough «nft• et ncm ~· tor tke 

ma\ .. tina 111 orter to ct.Ul'lllDe t1t.e1r pract1w111v .. 

3. JP 2'n!e •It as reported tbat m oard• an no loapr be1Jtg lhnd4e4, 

but an '-inc 418P0••4 1a tlae w.t ot ~ Dlnriat ot Colal:da P&,.r llanu.taoturiac 

c.,..., ftlNl.f,iJlc .11l a ooui4eahl• •'Yinc la con ... 1.&laer. 

*"- IMpe 1.- ... n •• reportect 'tba\ Bnzutlae• ullin4 norap apaoe tor . tll•• that. are mi\!Mtr IU'nllt nor clea4, 'Illa\ iD a llOl"e or len S-.1w ca\eeorJ".• 

TM hpp1)" Banob .... nque.W to loot iDM tM •t'kr. 

5• llm$ "*•lit.la reteruoe to .It.ea 15 ot Inkll.igew Dlrie1-

IWl.Uw eo-tttee llMUJag, it wu indioaiea \bat a probl.• ooaoend.Jlc tM 41•• 

poeal ot •uet. Uub nlne4. It .. stated that the •tter aa •1Dc i...nt.ca'Ucl• 

6. 1.1MM1D If SM OU.!f::' $IM QM.tf. OpCa\111 §Int•• PiDt'• • Col.-1 

Ceok nqwan• th.a\ t.11!1 t.U prooe4u:re• be eapl.OJ"ICl D.r ~ lranobe• ot tlMt 

Open.t!Jtc Seniae• DirlaiODI 

a. otna1a OOll8alT9W ot the D1't'i•1on Cid.et Oil ai-dllan ..,..niW abcmt 

'CAF-Se 

•• ,__. l'MC• sa11a\l_. t• ottloer ~tiOllll tlaNaP ta. ortte. et 

ilae Cld.91.", Ope:ratlDc aun... •t..ut.oa. 

•· Ponud all eor:reepoaS.ew fer tbe •ipatve ot tM 0111 saline ortloer 

tllrGagh * Qttioe ot tile Chief• Opeat11tc Seni•• Dirillt... 

7. ... Cel-1 Cook po!JRe4 Oil\ tl!tat ........ uu.. '° .....,..... ... !Jd:t.iate4 in '118 orti• of the C1 a wl'"C otfteu aJaowld • •1'1*1 

Sa .... , etts.•. 

pproved for Release by NSA on 10-07-2013 

ursuant to E.O. 13526 &u!l• ,, • Cook 

coi...i, •1-1 c..,. 

Cla!et, Gpuat!ltt a...u.. llft.alta
OFFICEOFTHESECRETARYSTATEOFDELAWAREDEPARTMENTOFNATURALRESOURCESANDENVIRONMENTALCONTROL89KINGSHIGHWAYDOVER,DELAWARE19901PHONE:(302)739-9000FAX:(302)739-6242 April 27, 2011 Mr. Shawn M. Garvin (3RAOO) Regional Administrator, Region III U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19 103-2029 Dear Mr. Garvin: RECEIVED JUN 20 2011PWISIOO Directof (3PPOO) I am pleased to submit the enclosed revision to the State of Delaware State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision
is a supplement

to a SIP revision that was submitted to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on September 16, 2009. The September 16, 2009 SIP revision was submitted
to satisfy the requirements
of Section

1 10(a)(i) and

1 10(a)(2) of the Clean Air Act (the Act) pursuant
to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Fine Particles (PM 2 . 5 ) promulgated
by the EPA on October 17, 2006 (71 FR 61224). The enclosed SIP revision consists of a technical analysis in support of the Department’s September 16, 2009 submittal’s provisions

to address the infrastructure SIP requirements
of Section
11 0(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)
for interstate transport. The requirements
of the CAA Section 110(a)(2)(A) have been met through the normal public hearing process established by the State of Delaware with proper notification (30 days) prior to the convening of the public hearing. The aforementioned document was made available for public review and comment beginning on December 22, 2010. A public hearing was held on February

1, 2011. Attachments

A and B are copies of affidavits
as proof of proper notification.

It is the position of the State of Delaware that all minimum requirements
set forth in the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments have been met. Ve4u4ve

4 taictze dØerd otMr. Shawn M. Garvin (3RAOO) April 27, 2011 Page
2 Note that

I submitted this same supplemental technical analysis to EPA on January 10, 2011, and requested that EPA process
it in parallel with the September 16, 2009 SIP submission. We look forward to continuing the cooperative effort between Delaware and EPA in this important work. As always, feel free to contact me or Au Mirzakhalili, P.E., Director of Air Quality, (302) 739-9402,
if you have any questions concerning this submittal. Sincerely Cara Secretary Enclosures cc: Diana Esher, EPA, w/encl. Au Mirzakhalili
REF ID:A67379 

• ~ O JAN 1955 

FROM: Cba1rnan, Editorial Policy Board 

SUBJEC'ra Second Meeting ot EA 'l'echnical Journal Editorial .Policy Board - .Agema. 

'l'he second meeting ot the Editorial Policy Board will 'be held Friday, 

28 January 1955 at oBoo in the Sta.ft Conference Roam,, 19-244. 

The Agenda is as follows: 

l. Revi:ew and approval of' the minutes of the first meeting ot the Baud •. 

2. Report by Subcommittee appointed at lst meeting on 14 Ja.nua.ry 1955· 

3. Review ot qualif'ications desired in e. Mamgi.Dg Editor pt"edicated 

on an examination ot the tentative Job description, prepared by tbe Subconmittee, 

including: 

a. AD ex~saion of teelillg as to whether these qualif'ica.tions can 

best be mt by selection from within or outside the Agency. 

4. Discussion of the role of this Board, baaed on Dr. Shim's work 

with the Subcommittee on the problem ot working relationships of the Boe.rd 

aDd the Muaging Editor, to include: 

a. Ita relationship to the respons1"b111ties and authority of 

the Ma.DaginS Editor. · · 

b. Placement ot the review and approval authority relative to 

applications tor receipt ot the Journal. 

c. .Tbe eatabliahll!ent of procedures and responsibilities far tbe 

editorial review ot articles submitted tor publishing in the Jourml. 

5. Discussion of tbe means to stimulate people to prepu-e articles tor· 

pu'bliehins in the Journal., to include: · 

a. Clarification ot the question of where and on whose time such 

articles abould be pre-pa.red. 

6. Diacuasion in broad terms ot the types of ti tlea and subject matter 

that should be encouraged for use -in tbe Jourml. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 05-30-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
# CE2004084EN.01012201.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/122 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/122

---

(2004/C 84 E/0158)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3952/03

by Catherine Stihler (PSE) to the Commission

(22 December 2003)

Subject:   Standards on laying gas pipes

Subject:

Can the Commission inform me what standards are in force in Europe so far as the laying of gas pipes through domestic properties is concerned?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(6 February 2004)

(6 February 2004)

The Commission does not have any competence on the question of the grant of rights of way for laying gas pipelines through domestic properties, which entirely falls under the competence of Member States. As a consequence, the Commission does not dispose of any information on corresponding standards in force in Europe.

---