alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AAM-11-339-E 

June 14, 2011 

 Exemption No. 10287 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0600 

Mr. Scott Bekken 

Director of Operations 

Executive Air Taxi Corp. 

P.O. Box 2273 

Bismarck, ND 58502 

Dear Mr. Bekken: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated June 2, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Executive Air Taxi, Inc (EAT) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow EAT to cover its safetysensitive employees under one testing program while operating under separate parts of the 

regulation. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to EAT. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into 

one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 
2 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Executive Air Taxi, Corp. an exemption from 14 CFR 

part 120 to the extent necessary to allow EAT to cover its safety-sensitive employees under 

one testing program while operating under separate parts of the regulation, subject to the 

conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Executive Air Taxi are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at 

all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the auspices of the 

Executive Air Taxi part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

 

This exemption terminates on July 31, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Frederick E. Tilton, M.D. 

Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1585 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1585

To authorize the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to issue an order 
   continuing a stay of a hydroelectric license for the Mahoney Lake 
 hydroelectric project in the State of Alaska, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 16, 2015

 Ms. Murkowski introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to issue an order 
   continuing a stay of a hydroelectric license for the Mahoney Lake 
 hydroelectric project in the State of Alaska, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAY AND REINSTATEMENT OF FERC LICENSE NO. 11393 FOR THE 
              MAHONEY LAKE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the Federal 
        Energy Regulatory Commission.
            (2) License.--The term ``license'' means the license for 
        Commission project number 11393.
            (3) Licensee.--The term ``licensee'' means the holder of 
        the license.
    (b) Stay of License.--On the request of the licensee, the 
Commission shall issue an order continuing the stay of the license.
    (c) Lifting of Stay.--On the request of the licensee, but not later 
than 10 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission 
shall--
            (1) issue an order lifting the stay of the license under 
        subsection (b); and
            (2) make the effective date of the license the date on 
        which the stay is lifted under paragraph (1).
    (d) Extension of License.--On the request of the licensee and 
notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the Federal 
Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) for commencement of construction of the 
project subject to the license, the Commission shall, after reasonable 
notice and in accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and public 
interest requirements of that section, extend the time period during 
which the licensee is required to commence the construction of the 
project for not more than 3 consecutive 2-year periods, notwithstanding 
any other provision of law.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Premier Financial Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Robert W. Walker and Brien M. Chase, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:





o
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





o
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By:  /s/ Robert W. Walker


---------------------------------------


Robert W. Walker


President and Chief Executive Officer








By:  /s/ Brien M. Chase


---------------------------------------


Brien M. Chase


Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





Date: March 30, 2010



























---
REF ID:A71769 

$ca.:np Vi3it tc RS.\ 

R/D OEC291954 

1. Some or all of the toUOlf!.n& SCAMP members 1d.ll be at ISA for three 

weeks comraondnG 17 Ja?JU9.J7 1954: 

/A. A. Albert (st&rt.ing ?A Jan.) ~ J. Paige - L.J c t-.. A 

A ~.--£H.nn:i (1! c:lenred in timJ)l"a. B. '.!.'ompk1ns 

~.,,. -~ _.,/ :S. H. Spa.nl.er {_w- ~ ........ 'AA..'v-"\A.,,) .... ~. ~:i!tlJcm ""(it cleared in time) 

u.sc. ~ - I it. Wbitw:m /J. D. swift, - 1-~ AJ.. $.tuA'-\ 

u c .... A - / '!_ '\ H. M&J"lov ./Mf.na Rees - \\ 

1T "'"~~\ 2. These reople hava bad e~"lriance .'!t N9A and its predecessors vaeying_ 

trom considerable to negli$!.ble. Since t.he;y 1'111 be at SCAMP 155 and since they 

&re a potential so~ or ~ized consultants, it. is des.tra.hle t.o give them a 

good indoctrination 1nto Agency ;>roblems durin.g their rls1t. 

3. It is expected that about one ot the three weeks (probably the la.st; 

will be dOTOted to 1.nf'orJN\l. t:al.ks and independent stud;r. R/D 1a planning .more 

formal presentations occupying on~ week or pPr'h.a,a less. 

4. It is hoped that ?ROD w1l.l !lake 'l presentation tor a period of about one 

week. Tho object would be to provide ba~und leading up to the outstanding 

high-level tecbnica.1. pl"'Oblems of the ~ency including ALBATROSS and 3CRA:GI..m. 

U tbe7 a.re &ttmitt.ed to com;p&Z"tmented prob1ems it would, ot oourse1 not be 

neeeaaary to brief' tbeJ!l on the details of the status o! progresa in order tel point 

out the types ot dift!cultiea which need to be overcome. 

4. 

(60572). 

For deta.11.a ot acbedul:ing please contact Dr. R. A. Md bl er1 NSA-.34 

~-- lv~ M- c~~_.... .... -

COi 

'JOU {Z) 

S/AS!lf (Mr. Friedman ) 

JOE 

• Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-17-2014 pursuant to E .0>1352B <
REF I:q_._A65048 

., 

10.l'E: 

' 

!he attached paper (Exhibit l 

to Annaure 01 to Draft Appendix Q) 

vu 1llcclqllete whm the_ paj)R to 

which it refers (USOIB 14/zrt) ... distributed to all Mtmbera. 

Plean append th1a p&Pf.!19 to 

the mcloave nth USCD 14/m. 

!he SecNtar1at. 

eclassifiecl ancl approved for release by NSA on 01-26-2015 

ursuant to E. 0. 13526 
TOP BB! eAB6B = SBeURI!'!' DPeRllAl!I911 

_____________________ ........ ___________ ___ 

Exhibit 1. 

DD-- -

Q.)5~ 

f/p-9~ 

24 

Operational ,!!!\ Losistical R!$:1u1rements 

!2£ Jm. Ausme:ntatio~ ~ OCBQ PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

1. Following is the proposed u. s. peacetime augtnentat1on 

or OCBQ. 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 
·=~RB!~~~ EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 
EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

3 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 
. • .~; 8B89Rift 8BQRB9 I&SRllAT!elf"hpn= 0-~-uea~~u!!!::~~~!mw ee=·?1ty m1Pzletion1 and a"tb=·vl to maw·· *h0 ialawr.tiaa 11p11iall M1lill -~ 0 3. 3(h) (

2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 -

4 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 
w if~~ SBClmlR szem.Y Jla'OR"19'Nlftis•n• 8~Mf~erea~n~~:!~!!~:w!,uw •Amar•tv m,..1,raaoa end ,,,,bcmzed *a re=·= the in'o=m·•is• -.,s:ts• II•••'• EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

5 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 
•' -,:; 

RelJRIW 

~RBY IIPORlllJIIOll e.ZX~~~ EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

• 

6 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY Form1 fJf~OSC TOP SECRET CANOE
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.01
                                                                   -------------


                                Subsidiaries of
                   Occupational Health + Rehabilitation Inc

Occupational Orthopaedic Center, Inc.,
    a Rhode Island corporation

NEB Occupational Health,
    a Massachusetts general partnership

CM Occupational Health, Limited Liability Company, 
    a Maine limited liability company 
    (also doing business as The Health Center)

Argosy Health Northeast,
    a Massachusetts general partnership

OHR/MMC, Limited Liability Company,
    a Maine limited liability company
    (also doing business as OH+R, an affiliate of Maine Health (an LLC))

Kent/OH+R, LLC,
    a Rhode Island limited liability company
Exhibit 32.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Jay A. Herman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Delphax Technologies Inc. (the Company),do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 (1)  the accompanying Quarterly Report on From 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Dated: February 11, 2005 By:      /s/ Jay A. Herman            Jay A. Herman        Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

HANDLE VIA BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM ONLY SPECIAL HANDLING 

09

,I

£

3

S

-3AS 

SUBJECT: Foreign Procurement, Dorian/EKC 

TO: General Martin 

1. This evaluation is based on a study of EKC documents under 

the cover letter, Subject: Dorian Project, Foreign Origin Procurement, March 9, 1966, and personal conversations of my project 

engineer, Major R. F. Burke with the responsible EKC engineers. 

2. There are three factors for consideration; schedule, 

equipment reliability and equipment capability. There are 

three possible contractors; Berthiez (French), Blanchard and. 

Springfield Machine Tool Company. Of these three, the latter 

may be eliminated since they do not want the job and have 

elected not to bid. 

meMEIM 

7> 3. Based on schedule, Berthiez offers 13 months while Blanchard 

offers 18 months delivery in a state that will require in-house 

modifications by EKC. Since we will have delivered glass blanks 

"r1 prior to the availability of either machine, the earlier Berthiez 

m=mme date is distinctly advantageous. (As an interim measure the 

existing Blanchard may be used to grind the solid test blanks). 

Therefore, on schedule alone, even if capability and reliability 

were equal, the Berthiez machine becomes mandatory. 

4. Berthiez has built machines of this size with a capability 

to meet our required tolerances in the past. Neither Blanchard 

nor EKC have a great deal of confidence in theiro develompnt of 

the new machine. 

5. Considering the critical schedule differences and what, at 

this time, appears to be an increased reliability or confidence 

in the Berthiez equipment, the undersigned concurs with EKC and 

 recommends a sole source procurement from that company. 

■ Iwww)mr10. 

BYRON F. KNOLLE JR. 

Lt. Colonel, USAF 

Deputy Director 

HANDLE VIA BYEMAN 

cpwRoL SYSTEM ONLV 

Copy--AV'Of eoplAS 

Page / of / Pages. 

Control No.10,S11:64; 

SPECIAL HANDLING 

/(4zi-la
# CE2004088EN.01068801.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/688 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/688

---

(2004/C 88 E/0707)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0188/04

by Marco Cappato (NI) to the Commission

(29 January 2004)

Subject:   Abduction of two Ivorians

Subject:

On 4 December 2003, while inside their vehicle, a grey Peugeot 405 with the registration number 2532CE01, Gbane Aboubacar and his brother Soule Ouattara were abducted by an armed commando near the Treichville cultural centre in Côte d'Ivoire.

Since then, attempts by their family in Koumassi to find them have been in vain. Searches at police stations and gendarmes' barracks in the administrative capital, Abidjan, have so far proved fruitless. Relatives of the victims and their political family, the Democratic Party of Côte d'Ivoire (PDCI-RDA), are shocked by this new episode of violence in the country.

Does the Commission have any information about this abduction that took place in mysterious circumstances?

Can the Commission intervene with the Ivorian authorities so that this kidnapping can be solved as quickly as possible?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(26 February 2004)

(26 February 2004)

The Commission is aware of the case of Mr Gbane Aboubacar and his brother Mr Soule Ouattara. Their abduction was mentioned in various newspapers, including ‘le Nouveau Réveil’ and ‘le Libéral’.

The party of which Mr Aboubacar is a member, the PDCI-RDA, undertook inquiries in police stations in the neighbourhood, and in the central jailhouse, the ‘Maison d'Arrêt et de Correction’, in Abidjan, but found no information.

The International Red Cross Committee was neither informed by the family nor by PDCI and was not aware of this case.

The ‘Ligue Ivoirienne des Droits de l'Homme’ (LIDHO) was informed of the case through newspapers. Their board discussed the issue on 26 January 2004, but decided not to make further inquiries because neither the family nor PDCI requested any help from them.

The ‘Mouvement Ivoirien des Droits Humains’ (MIDH) sought further information from members of the family, but they did not want to give any details and suggested to ask PDCI. In the meantime, the family moved to an unknown address.

The Delegation of the Commission in Côte d'Ivoire will raise this matter with the Government.

---
... 

USCIB: 29.9/12 

'i'9P SEQii!l' 

. -----.. ~ -- __ __,.. -.. 

~A609~ ,., 

13 July 1955 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEXBEBS OF USCIB: PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Intercept Base Rights in I .... _....._____, 

USCIB 29.9/11 dated 22 June 1955. 

1. Vote sheet replies to the/reference indicate approval by all 

members with the following exceptions: / ' 

a. Department of' State: "Recommend deletion, in last 

se~o.:t' paragraph 1, of phr···ase 1 ••• the permission of will be obtained, •• ' and substi~ution of 

1 ••• 11 consult with I l •. • there:f'or." 

b. Department of State and U.S •. Air Force: 11Reconmend 

deletion, in third sentence ot paragraph 2 the phrase 

• ••• on a request basis ••• • and substitution of 

' ••• as mutually agreeable, •• ' therefor." 

2. In the absence of objection by th~ close of 'business, Tuesday, 

20 J~ 1955, the above amendments will be considered approved. 

USCIB: 29. 9 /12 

'• • 

USCIB 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-21-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

TOP SECRET
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

# Current Images

HomeHistoryNational Cryptologic MuseumExhibits & ArtifactsCryptologic MuseumCurrent Exhibits

Search

Search

                              - All Images 
                              - Design Elements 
                              - NSA Historical Photographs 
                              - Other 

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (1.47 MB)

Tags:DEIA

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

<TABLE>

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
<CAPTION>

SUBSIDIARY                            LOCATION              BUSINESS          DATE                % OWNED

<S>                                   <C>                   <C>               <C>                 <C>
Research Engineers, Europe Ltd.       Bristol, UK           Software Sales    1986                100%
Research Engineers, Pvt Ltd.          Calcutta, India       Software Sales    1986                100%
Research Engineers, GmbH              Herne, Germany        Software Sales    November, 1995*     100%
Research Engineers, SARL              Dourdan, France       Software Sales    October, 1998       100%
R-Cube Technologies, Inc.             San Jose, CA          IT Services       February, 1999*     100%
PacSoft Incorporated                  Woodinville, WA       Software Sales    March, 1999*        100%
NetGuru Systems, Inc.                 Waltham, MA           IT Services       September, 1999*    100%
NetGuru Consulting, Inc.              Waltham, MA           IT Services       September, 1999*    100%
e-Destinations, Inc.                  Artesia, CA           e-commerce        January, 2000*      100%
Allegria Software, Inc.               Yorba Linda, CA       Software Sales    April , 2000*       100%
NetGuru India Pvt. Ltd.               Calcutta, India       e-commerce        May, 2000*          100%

----------------------------------------
* Acquired; balance of subsidiaries were created.

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5

<MULTIPLIER>               1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            22,816
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    266,123
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                      391,363
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 697,912
<PP&E>                                         4,227,851
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,863,626
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,071,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,110,868
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                      11,129,954
<OTHER-SE>                                   (10,138,450)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,071,133
<SALES>                                          550,508
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 550,508
<CGS>                                            398,650
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    398,650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 209,953
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                21,339
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (71,434)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (71,434)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0 
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (71,434)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0
        


</TABLE>