alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
assceiated costs previous carried 8 & part of the W8-117L program.
Cit we ames "to eotahiion the identity of tats
project te fron WS-117L program. It is recognised thet
Ouch a dé oa will involve arbitvary distinetions in view of the
be mate nes involved and that the division of ecst will wave te
ve made on a statistiea) rather then an secouting basis. Further,

it will be necessary that te deve: lane and setivt
and progress reports be submitted. an A Order to this afseet?
process. .

we have aliloceated
@n@ $100 million to the progran.

In response to your memorandum of Novesber 17, and in
confirmation of cur several conversations on the Oub ject, the
Secretary of Defense and ARPA agreed to the asp the
Air Perce of the operational responsibility for progren
to the ARDC Fre ta eis avers) years and witil final objectives

t the tentative basie center

Perce Base at sone

pertinent to the program,

Consistent with the separation of these prograne, we are
Sor ris aa
and $107 million Josable the Skvtryr - Sinilarly, for
ra ee ae

i
!
i
:
iH
af

oe -53593



cr §3SI3



/8/ ROY VW. Jomaon

/e/ Rory

Direster OREBON

C8 - $3593


‘Ae sanounced yootirdey, ARPA has inaugurated

oy v & prog: to -
r a ,  Syttains Wed tachaiqees which will Ne employed ca the
ek ree ee
in . realy eoaectnied es tratiow include not oaly d
THOR - priviously associated with WS-117L, bet
wit Ease ne net ce NEIL prog ly
oriéated,

: The first such project consists of the LIT progease na suet a
: €0ete previously carried as a part of the WS-117L program, Heréefo:
| the project will be known as DISCOVERER-THOR project and it will be

. Will have to be made on a statietics! rather thar. ar accounting hasis,
Further, it will be neceseary that separate sevelopment plane and activity
and progress reports be submitted, An ARPA Order to thie effect is in
Process; .

Witting $107 raillion allocable to the
x ORT I Mall 5 have alloc: pto

C8-53593





Qa...

ROL ASE So :
ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY
Washington 25, D.C.

Dee. 4, 1958

MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE
Attn: Tae Under Secretary of the Air Force

SUBJECT: WS-117L Progran

AS Grmouneed yesterday, ARPA has ineugwrated a to
develop &, meaber of ayetens, ead ° os whieh will be
imown as Will, im asccedanee with the wisnes of the
Administration inefude net only the THOR lewehings ously
ieeceieted wish the Ws-2172 wregren > Wat will be ¢ to

Henesforth, the Jeet will be known es DIBOOVERER THOR. se seer .
ow"

and it will be nese: to establish the identity of this”
project o te fron WS-117L program. I¢ as recognised that

ion will involve arbitrary distinetions in view of the
Common items involved and that the division cf eost will have

8 Bl losable
YY we have alloeated
and $100 million to the Sm

‘ Progren
to the ARDO for the next severe) and until final objectives
are obtained. It is also that tas tentative baste center
fo be established at or meat Offutt Air Fores tty antite

CE -53593
CERTIFICATIONS
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
  /s/ James M. McCluneyJames M. McCluneyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
CONSENT OF NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.

 

As oil and gas consultants, we hereby consent to the use of our name and our report dated January 18, 2008, in this Form 10-K, incorporated by reference into Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.’s previously filed Registration Statement File Nos. 333-122424, 333-25995, 333-62155, 333-33726, 333-54616, 333-60912-01, 333-55866-01, 333-91316-01, 333-102961, 333-102962-01 333-124471, 333-141491 and 333-142584 on Form S-3, and 333-122168 and 333-56343 on Form S-8.

 

 

|   | **NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.** |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|   |                                          |   |
|   |                                          |   |
|   |                                          |   |
|   | By:                                           | /s/ Danny D. Simmons |
|   |                                          | Danny D. Simmons, P.E. |
|   |                                          | President and Chief Operating Officer |
|   |                                          |   |

 

 

Houston, Texas

February 13, 2008
\ 

REF ID :A610.35 

USCIB: 29~2/8 

15 June 1954 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Approval of USCIB 29.2/6 dated 4 June 1954. 

There having been no objection to the action proposed in subject 

paper it stands approved and the Director, National Security Ji.gency 

should proceed accordingly. 

USCIB: 29.2/8 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-11-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e I 

?4
Amendment No.3 to Acuity Brands, Inc 2002 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan




 Exhibit 10(iii)A(88) 
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 
 TO 
 ACUITY
BRANDS, INC. 
 2002 SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN 
 (As Amended And Restated Effective As Of January 1, 2005) 
 THIS AMENDMENT made as of this 24th day of October, 2008, by ACUITY BRANDS,
INC. (the “Company”); 
 W I T N E S S E T H: 
 WHEREAS, the Company established the Acuity Brands, Inc. 2002 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, which Plan was amended and restated generally effective as of
January 1, 2005 (the “Plan”), subject to the transition rules of Section 409A; 
 WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the
Plan in the manner hereinafter provided; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, as follows: 
 1. 
 Section 1.1(a) is hereby amended by adding the
following proviso to the end of the first sentence of the present section: 
 “; provided, that for Executive Officers who are active employees on
January 1, 2009, the monthly benefit payable commencing at Normal Retirement Date shall be an amount equal to the product of 1.8% of the Participant’s Average Annual Compensation multiplied by the Participant’s Years of Credited
Service up to a maximum of ten (10) years, divided by twelve (12).” 
 2. 
 This Amendment No. 3 shall be effective as of January 1, 2009. Except as hereby modified, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Amendment No. 3 as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	ACUITY BRANDS, INC.
		
	BY:	 	/S/  VERNON J. NAGEL
		 	 Vernon J. Nagel
 Chairman, President, and
 Chief Executive Officer
EX-10.2






Exhibit 10.2




THIRD AMENDMENT

TO

DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.

2005 DIRECTORS STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN




     Dresser-Rand Group Inc., a Delaware corporation, having established the Dresser-Rand Group
Inc. 2005 Directors Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), and having reserved the right under Article
VI thereof to amend the Plan, does hereby amend the Plan as follows:



     1. The definition of “Change in Control” set forth in Section 7.1 of the Plan is hereby
amended to read in its entirety as follows:



     “CHANGE IN CONTROL” means the first to occur of any of the following events:



     (i) during any 12-month period, the members of the Board (the “INCUMBENT DIRECTORS”)
cease for any reason other than due to death or disability to constitute at least a majority
of the members of the Board, PROVIDED that any director whose election, or nomination for
election by the Company’s stockholders, was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the
members of the Board who are at the time Incumbent Directors shall be considered an
Incumbent Director, other than any such individual whose initial assumption of office occurs
as a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to the election or
removal of directors or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or
on behalf of a person other than the Board;




     (ii) the acquisition or ownership by any individual, entity or “group” (within the
meaning of Section 13(d)(3) of the Act), other than the Company or any of its Affiliates or
Subsidiaries, or any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the
Company or any of its Affiliates or Subsidiaries, of beneficial ownership (within the
meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Act) of 50% or more of the combined voting power
of the Company’s then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the
election of directors;




     (iii) the merger, consolidation or other similar transaction of the Company, as a
result of which the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to such merger,
consolidation or other transaction, do not, immediately thereafter, beneficially own,
directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the combined voting power of the voting securities
entitled to vote generally in the election of directors of the merged, consolidated or other
surviving company; and




     (iv) the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets
of the Company to one or more persons or entities that are not, immediately prior to such
sale, transfer or other disposition, Affiliates of the Company.



A “Change in Control” shall not be deemed to occur if the Company undergoes a bankruptcy,
liquidation or reorganization under the United States Bankruptcy Code.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Dresser-Rand Group Inc. has caused these presents to be executed by its
duly authorized officer and be effective this 28th day of October, 2008.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Mark F. Mai
 	 
	 	 	Mark F. Mai 	 
	 	 	Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary 	 




1
<TABLE>
     
                                                       EXHIBIT 11

                           BAIRNCO CORPORATION
           CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
         FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED APRIL 4, 1998 AND MARCH 29, 1997
                               (Unaudited)
<CAPTION>
                                               1998          1997
<S>                                            <C>           <C> 
BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:

Net income                                     $  2,196,000  $  2,173,000

Average common shares outstanding                 8,896,000     9,393,000

Basic Earnings Per Common Share                $       0.25  $       0.23


DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:

Net income                                     $  2,196,000  $  2,173,000

Average common shares outstanding                 8,896,000     9,393,000
Common shares issuable in respect to 
  options issued to employees with a 
  dilutive effect                                   274,000       142,000
Total diluted common shares outstanding           9,170,000     9,535,000

Diluted Earnings Per Common Share              $       0.24  $       0.23


Basic  earnings  per common share were computed by  dividing  net
income   by   the  weighted  average  number  of  common   shares
outstanding  during  the quarter.  Diluted  earnings  per  common
share include the effect of all dilutive stock options.




</TABLE>
··SECRET 

REF ID:A45385 

A 

---, Co:mm!l.nd~_ng Officer ......,. ____ _ ~as~_.:+.~-~rt Commandant ,,,.c::. 

--¥_~.ir-' L•f_ c:~;n:.1 Research~ ' ./ ... / 

i.:JC!'l1.l'<:•.L J a . ---Fiscal 0 --

Administrative o --- ·Post Adjufant -------

Intelligence O Provost Marsha ... 1 ______ _ 

2nd Sig Serv Bn --:....------ Ch!ef, Pers & Tng Div --- Chief, Pers Br ------- Chief, Tng Br --------~ o/c Officer P~e-r_s_S~e-c ___ .....,._ 

---Chief, Oper Serv Div ___ .._ __ _ Chief, Communications Br 

Chief, Laboratory Br --- Chi e i', Machine Br ..------

C!j.ief, Supply Br ------- O/C, SSA Mail Un_,.i .... t ____ _ 

Chief, Security Div ------ Chief, Protective ---------- Sec Br 

Chief, Cryptographic Br ---- Chief, Development Br --- Chief, Intelligence Div ---- ---- Chief, Language Br ----- -,,..._,...,,,__...,..._ Chief, Mil Cryptanalytic Br 

Chief, Gen Cryptanalytic Br--

Chief, T/A and Contro 1 Br - Chief, I & L Br ~ 

A~ discussed 

s requested~-------

omments and return nformation and fil_e _______ _ 

Information and forwarding ~ Inform.aticn and return --- ·---- Recommendation 

See note on rev.erse ------- Signature if approved ------ Your action --~--

SIS SC Form No. 96 (Rev) 

16 Nov 44 

lA\pproved for Release by NSA on 10-07-2013 pursuant to E. 0. 1352§ 
...... • 

REF ID:A45385 

?A-te• ot 11ee\!!I Hild 

31 Ootober 122'4 

1. Allocation ot P!araaomlt A ~ diacuaion ot the paper 

on AllocaUon or Pinonnet'. £0 tL ~· -.. neld. Part.ioul• 

attention as inrtted to \be tact that.. the ciTili&n allotMltat ••not 

assigned b.r gradea. 

2. Trif b,y the C~!di;S otticert Then as a nry brief 

·diaouada an propos&lpOW t&1ieen by Colonel Corderun. No 

specif'ic questions were nbmitted tor 1Dcluaicm in a rmmorand\D to 

Calcael Corderman for in!Ql'Dlatian traa the theatere imrol"Ylld. 

). Itetu of' Staf! Jleet.in~ The follOlliJ:lg itw taken .trail the 

swt 1fe4t\tiii on 30 octo&r Dl were di~• 

a. The Personnel W&etilltc~ to be bald at 1500, Mday1 l 

lov'ember 194h. 

b. The Perm Meeting on 1 HO'l'eJJiber 19Wt., at *1cb. t.119 

Colonel Allaopp 11111 discuss hls reoent trip. 

c. TM duirability to improve t.bl gemral ovv~ 

appearancea within sections. 

d.. The pouibility ot a aoticn picture being made depicting 

the general operation.a ot. Signal Seour1ty .lgenc.r, as d18C'U888d.. 

CCI 

Colonel OOl'deNan 

Earle F. Code 

Colonel, Sii;pal. Corps 

Chi.et, Operating Sern.cea Divisis 

Branoh Cldafs, ~rating Senic• Divisic 

Mr. '"*Imm 

Chi.et, Penmnel. llld Trairdng Dirlsicm 

Chter, I.ntelligenee Division 

Cltlet, security Dirlaion
Approved for Release: 2018/02/01 C05101985 

C ON¥, IDE N TIA L 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1400079874D 

14 December 1007 

MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD 

SUBJECT: Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return of 

Astronauts, and the Return of Objects Launched into Outer Space. 

1. Major McCarthy phoned on 11 December to state that he had 

discussed SAFSS and SAFSL IS proposal for special treatment for 

manned space ships in the subject Agreement (see attached copy 

of memo), with Air Force General Counsel IS office, which said 

in effect: 

a. "It would take a lot of humanitarian reasons to get language 

of this kind accepted by all participants. If U. S. has tried before to 

get special treatment for manned space ships, with no success. 

b. The basic Outer Space Treaty really covers this point anyway, in that it refers to "space objects or component parts thereof. " 

2. Major McCarthy also referred to the difficulty of making effective 

proposals in the US-USSR bilateral discussions because of the 

scheduling of meetings on short notice and the fact that the word on 

such meetings is not always available in time to make good use of it. 

3. I discussed the above with Colonel Ford and we agreed that in view 

of the circumstances we should not push our proposal further at this 

time, but, at the same time, we should make a plea for getting in the 

loop earlier in the future. I phoned Major McCarthy to this effect and 

he said he would attempt to improve the situation for future reviews. 

4. Subsequent to the above series of events, Major McCarthy forwarded 

a copy of Capt Valentine's memo on this subject with a later draft of the 

A&R text agreed to by the US and USSR in the bilateral discussions which 

began in September 1967 (copy attached). Article ~ Return QLObjects 

now refers specifically to a "space object or its component parts, If 

which is preferable to the old language which referred only to space 

objects. SAFSS and SAFSL felt that the latter language could be interpreted to mean space fragments. 

5. The draft A&R agreement is scheduled to go before the Legal Subcommittee 14 December and an attempt will be made to clear it through 

the General Assembly before 19 December when the GA is scheduled to 

adjourn. 

CONFIDl!:N'l'IAL 

Approved for Release: 2018/02/01 C05101985 

i 

( 

, 

, 

-
ey

|

ee: —, . = Ss
SAMOS II FACT SHEET

1+: GENERAL INFORMATION
_ Project SAMOS is a research and development program to determine the
. capabilities for making observations of space, the atmosphere-and the nature
of the globe from satellites... The program is under. the executive management
of the Secretary of the Air Force.
IL: TEST OBJECTIVE
. SAMOS II was launched into the Pacific Missile Range from an Air Force
launch pad at the Naval Missile Facility, Point Arguello, California, to place
the vehicle in a near circular polar orbit. The purpose of the research and
. development SAMOS fights. is component testing bearing on the engineering
. feasibility of obtaining an observation capability from an orbiting satellite.
1 CONFIGURATION
i SAMOS employs the AGENA as its second stage. tt is boosted out of
the atmosphere by a modified Air Force ATLAS, and placed into orbit by ‘
“the AGENA.
. First Stage
Booster:: An Air Force ATLAS modified for the SAMOS IL.
. Height: Approximately 77 feet... “(With adapter section),
Launch Weight:: Approximately 262, 000 pounds.
- Propulsion: ‘Rocketdyne liquid propellant engine, . 356, 000 pounds thrust,


. |. Giuidance and Control: The ATLAS booster_ia equipped with the. GE/Burzoughs :
7 -Fadio command guidance system, The guidance oyster can detect position
= snd rate, compare'this tnforshasion with the predetermined projectory dats,

tote in , ; ;
e, . . Satelite Vebicte -

, _The entire Lockheed AGENA second stage becomes’ the erbiting
. *, “eatentite vehicle.
“vo Hlalght:: About 22 fect. 7 .
“Weight: Approximately 11, 000 ppunds at launch. Orbital weight after feel
exhaustion will be approximately 4,100 pounds.
_ Propalsion: Following coast period after ATLAS Burnout, = Bell quid
. “foal re rocket engine; developing 15, 000 pounds of thrust, will ropelithe
second stage into orbit.
- “Tastrament Package: Test photographic and related equipment,
, IV. TRAC: -TELEMETRY AND COMMAND :
af Primary tracking, telemetry and command faring orbit will be. .
1 Performed by: : Co. .
- Vandenberg Tracking Station, Vandenberg AFB, California
: Bb Ascent Guidance (booster) 7 a

<

“' GE MOD. Vandenberg AFB, California



wees Ascent Tracking and Telemetry

_ Yestaabers Tracking’ Biation; Vandenberg, California .

oe 7 : me Joe E. Mann. SON Bee 7
wo ve. _Ascelt Radar and/or Opttent braiting (PMR) ,
oe Point Arguello,. California — : . .
‘Point Mugu, California « : ;
"+++ Ste. Nicholas Island, California - : : -
“t. USAF Satellite Test Center, Sunnyvale, California
. - , , _ + (Control Canter Feceiving all orbital data and exercising
_ 7 » Sommandcesre of 843s)
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
   
  As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use, in this
registration statement on Form S-4, of our report dated January 12, 1999 for
Framingham York Associates Limited Partnership as of December 31, 1998, 1997,
1996 and 1995 and for each of the four years in the period ended December 31,
1998, included herein and to all references to our Firm included in this
registration statement.     
 
                                          /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
 
Boston, Massachusetts
   
February 24, 1999
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
The Board of Directors
Lycos, Inc.:
 
  We consent to the use of our report incorporated herein by reference and to
the references to our firm under the headings "Experts" and "Selected
Historical Financial Data" in the proxy statement/prospectus.
 
                                          /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
Boston, Massachusetts
   
April 15, 1999
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 16.1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


Board of Directors and Shareholders
St. Joseph Capital Corporation
Mishawaka, Indiana


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of St. Joseph
Capital Corporation (the Company) as of December 31, 2001 and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash
flows for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of
December 31, 2001, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the
years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.




                                            /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
                                            Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

South Bend, Indiana
February 27, 2002