alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Studied (AF) MOL 

sulOmptililik 

1964 tigA 13 fyi 

5 

S AF SS GR V 

a. 

SS'4 

85.71. 

s5-2 

S373 

SS-5 I 

SS-7 66.78 

SS-9 

RIP-1 

P4Ii. 2.• 

vitgle Bittigi 

irteth 

Corr-16.1.141A- 1 1)186 

.e'rbbtrol 

•••• •••••■••.. 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

/132105Z ZEA 

B 

X ZEA 

FOUR NINE 

1321052 

CITE WHIG 1016 

EYES ONLY COL FORD AND NEULUN. PROJECT DORIAN. 

REQUEST SPECIFICS OF YOUR CURRENT SECURITY HANDLING OF 

COVERT STUDY CONTRACT WITH EK CORP RELATING TO MAN AND HIS POTENTIAL 

VALVE TO A SATELLITE RECONN SYSTEM ( AND ANY OTHERS YOU MAY HAVE ON THIS 

SUBJECT) IN ADDITION TO YOUR RECOMMENDATION AS TO PROPRIETY OF 

INCLUDING SAME UNDER PROJECT DORIAN. WE ARE PRESENTLY FAVORABLY 

DISPOSED TO THIS HERE. UNDER SUCH AN ARRANGEMENT, WE WOULD OF 

COURSE AGREE TO YOUR SANITIZING THE DORIAN BRIEFING FOR CONTRACTOR 

TYPES TO EXCLUDE REFERENCED TO BYEMAN, ETC. 

PLEASE ADVISE. 

CFN: 1016 EYES ONLY COL FORD AND NEULUN PROJECT DORIAN EK CORP ( AND ANY 

OTHERS YOU MAY HAVE ON THIS SUBJECT) PROJECT DORIAN DORIAN BYEMAN ETC 

BT 

NNNN 

ia712,
**EXHIBIT 31.4**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, John R. Nieser, certify that:

 

1.                   Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cornell Companies, Inc.(the “registrant”);

 

2.                   Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.                   Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

 

 
| Date: April 22, 2005 | /s/ John R. Nieser                       |   |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 | John R. Nieser, Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health Special Emphasis Panel, Center of Excellence for Natural Product Drug Interaction Research (U54).                    

*Date:*                         March 19-20, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate cooperative agreement applications.                    

*Place:*                         Residence Inn Bethesda, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Peter Kozel, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Nat Ctr for Complementary and Integrative Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892-5475, 301-496-8004,                         *kozelp@mail.nih.gov.*
      ( print page 9740)    
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 18, 2015.

Michelle Trout, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-03632 Filed 2-23-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
From: Mills, Alberta E.

To: Heggs, Angela

Subject: FW: March 11th Letter from Senator Inhofe and Senator Vitter

Date: Friday, March 13, 2015 10:40:07 AM

Attachments: 2015_03_11_InhofeVitterLetter.pdf

Hi Angie,

comments for the phthalates rulemaking.

From: Tsacoumis, Stephanie 

Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 10:36 AM

To: Mills, Alberta E.

Cc: Levine, Jason; Boyle, Mary; Pollitzer, Patricia

Subject: FW: March 11th Letter from Senator Inhofe and Senator Vitter

For inclusion in the rulemaking record on the phthalates rule.

Many thanks in advance.

From: OLA e-mail 

Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 6:03 PM

To: Kaye, Elliot; Fong-Swamidoss, Jana; Adkins, Patricia; Tsacoumis, Stephanie; Wolfson, Scott;

Richardson, Julia; Midgett, Jonathan; Hatlelid, Kristina

Subject: FW: March 11th Letter from Senator Inhofe and Senator Vitter

Letter on phthalate rule.

CCs other commissioners.

Will need to go in public record I suppose.

Will post in OLA database tomorrow.

Jason K. Levine

Director

Office of Legislative Affairs

CPSC

301-504-7853

From: Ledbetter, Rachel (SBC) [mailto:Rachel_Ledbetter@sbc.senate.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 2:17 PM

To: OLA e-mail

Cc: Cormier, Ward (SBC)

Subject: March 11th Letter from Senator Inhofe and Senator Vitter

Mr. Levine,
I am emailing on behalf of Ward Cormier from Senator Vitter’s Office. Please find the attached

March 11th, 2015, letter regarding the Consumer Products Safety Commission.

Please let us know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Rachel Ledbetter

Staff Assistant

Senate Committee on Small Business & Entrepreneurship

Chairman David Vitter

428A Russell Senate Office Building

202-224-5175
#### Cuyahoga County Bar Association *v.*Bogart.

[Cite as *Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bogart*(1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 38.]

(No. 99-388

Submitted April 14, 1999

Decided June 23, 1999.)

*39
      *Charles Scott Rawlings, Jon F. Deegan*and *Earl Williams, Jr.,*for relator.

*Bruce P. Bogart, pro se.*

*Per Curiam.*

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. A stayed suspension with the conditions recommended by the board is an appropriate sanction for respondent’s misconduct and will assure that he receives the assistance necessary to treat his alcohol addiction and related dependency problems. See, *e.g., Disciplinary Counsel v. Maxwell*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 7, 697 N.E.2d 597, and *Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Baas*(1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 293, 681 N.E.2d 421, where we imposed similar sanctions for misconduct that included violations of DR 1-102(A)(6) and evidence of alcohol abuse. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for eighteen months, *40with the entire suspension stayed and respondent placed on probation under the conditions established by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 12.1

                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                           For the Years Ended
                                                           For the Ten     ---------------------------------------------------
                                                           Months Ended          February 28,       
                                                           December 31,    -----------------------  February 29,  February 28,
                                                               1998           1998         1997        1996          1995
                                                           ------------    -----------------------  ------------  ------------
                                                                                          (In thousands)
<S>                                                         <C>            <C>          <C>           <C>           <C>
Loss from continuing operations..........................   $(545,532)     $(263,441)   $(138,825)    $(91,311)     $(30,614)
Add back:  losses from less-than-50% owned persons.......      23,527         18,769       17,879       26,631         4,288

Less: losses from less-than-50%-owned persons
 where the registrant has guaranteed debt:
   Teleport..............................................          --             --           --           --          (126)
   Swedish Cable.........................................          --             --           --           --           (65)
                                                            ---------      ---------    ---------     --------      --------
                                                             (522,005)      (244,672)    (120,946)     (64,680)      (26,517)

Fixed charges:
  Interest, whether expensed or capitalized, including  
   amortization of deferred financing costs..............     163,227        124,288       79,659       36,045         9,328
                                                            ---------      ---------    ---------     --------      --------

Adjusted earnings........................................    (358,778)      (120,384)     (41,287)     (28,635)      (17,189)
Fixed charges............................................    (163,227)      (124,288)     (79,659)     (36,045)       (9,328)
                                                            ---------      ---------    ---------     --------      --------
Ratio of earnings........................................          --             --           --           --            --
                                                            ---------      ---------    ---------     --------      --------
Amount of coverage deficiency............................   $(522,005)     $(244,672)   $(120,946)    $(64,680)     $(26,517)
                                                            =========      =========    =========     ========      ======== 

</TABLE>
99-1380.

#### State ex rel. Harrison v. Kainrad.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus by Christopher G. Harrison. *Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### Miller, Respondent, vs. Federal Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Bender, Trump, McIntyre & Freeman,*attorneys, and *Eugene L. McIntyre*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

For the *respondent: L. J. Fellenz*of Fond du Lac.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
# CE2004084EN.01042601.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/426 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/426

---

(2004/C 84 E/0496)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0535/04

by Avril Doyle (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(24 February 2004)

Subject:   Recognition of disability status across the European Union

Subject:

In the interests of promoting the free movement of persons with disabilities such as blindness, can the Commission advise on the current situation regarding the recognition of blindness and other disability certification from one Member State in other parts of the Community?

What steps are being taken towards harmonising criteria, certification and categorisation of disability to allow citizens moving between Member States to qualify for the same health and social welfare status across the EU without undergoing further testing?

Answer given by Mr Dimas on behalf of the Commission

(1 April 2004)

(1 April 2004)

The decision concerning the definition of disability as well as the modalities for assessment and certification (disability cards) are taken at national level. The situation is complicated by the fact that often several definitions exist at national level, depending in which context the definition is used. There is no general mutual recognition of certification/disability cards or a certain disability status entitling holders to the various concessions available in Member States other than the one that issued the card.

It should nevertheless be mentioned that for individual purposes (access to special services, reductions for travel or entry to cultural sites, etc.) a document issued in another Member State might be recognised. Moreover, through the voluntary system of blue parking cards initiated by the Commission, which gives entitlement to special parking concessions for those entitled under national rules, there is — in this particular case — general mutual recognition of the blue parking cards issued in one Member State and used in another.

The Commission has recently commissioned and published a study, ‘Definitions of Disability in Europe: A comparative Analysis’ (1), that will be presented for discussion to the Member States at one of the next meetings of the High Level Group Disability.

1

---

(1)  The study can be downloaded from the following Website:

1

http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/index/7002_en.html

---
Kathryne Vause Appellant/s Liberty Insurance Corporation

and Justin A. /s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 27, 2014

N o. 04-13-00614-CV

Kathryne VAUSE

, Appellant

v.

LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION and Justin A. Smith,

Appellees

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 07-2231-CV

William Old, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due to be filed on December 12, 2013. This court granted

Appellant’s first, second, and third motions for extension of time to file the brief until February

24, 2014. In our January 28, 2014 order, we warned Appellant that “ NO FURTHER

EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE GRANTED. ” We

also warned that “[i]f Appellant fails to file the brief as ordered, the court may dismiss this

appeal for want of prosecution.” Appellant did not file the brief as ordered.

On February 24, 2014, Appellant’s counsel filed an unopposed fourth motion for

extension of time to file the brief until March 26, 2014, for a total extension of 104 days. In the

motion, counsel described his recent major surgery and delayed recovery. As an unopposed

motion, counsel’s explanations are reasonable to justify a further extension up to, but not further

than

, the requested date. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.5(b).

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief must be filed with this court not

later than March 26, 2014. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(d). NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF

TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE GRANTED. If Appellant fails to file the

brief as ordered, the court may dismiss this appeal

. See id. R. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).___________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of February, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

,-..w.,........4 

... ' . i 1. 1-sr:Yr7qi• Effol9 

Ch12.15gtIg.•i! '6.`""' • ' 

, . 

,--1, 

) CONTROL, SYSTC 

WAN= VIA' BYEMAN 

. . . 1 ,..... m cr. V 

DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY 

• WASHINGTON, 0. C. Z0301 CO. \NO trtl 

;II 

!,,, 

,!.; 

SUBJECT: Special Materials, Support Requirements for MOL. ' 

• TO: Assistant Chief of Staff, Tntelligenee 

Department of the Air FOree 

AtTN: AFNINC 

1. Your letter of 8 April 1968, subject as above, and the briefings given 

by Air Force have clearly indicated the MC&G support requirements ,f9r the 

MOL. The system you have advanced for defining a specific image on a 

Master Photo Chip, preparation ofcueing materials and using computer. soft■ 

ware to provide a WGS position ie"recognized as a valuable and economical 

solution to the support of MOL operational activities. 

2. As collection systems provide'increased detail, the intelligence 

community is assessing its needs for a large scale coordinated series 

graphic of target areas and further considering the use of the World Area 

Grid as a means of identifying areas of various required dimensions. This 

consideration, together with system analyses being made for storage and 

retrieval of geodetic data, raisethe.question of the relationship of such 

graphical-imagery representations. Further study could indicate a single 

solution to these problems. ! • . 

3. As an interim measure, I have directed that DIA support and maintain 

separate CIF line item for the reaources allocated to ACIC for swam. 

con, 

4. With regard to your request that DIA undertake to explore, through the 

COMIREX, the usefulness of MPC as a tool to the intelligence community, it 

is my view that initial consideration should be given to this proposal within DoD, together with the problem set forth in paragraph 2 above. Thereafter, the full implications and potential benefits of the resulting MPC 

could be examined by the COMIREX.. Colonel Herndon and Mr. Hughes of DIA 

have been designated as my action officers for this purpose. As an 

initial step for the DoD effort, it would appear desirable to meet with your 

project personnel to define a brief program for investigating and validating 

the applicability of these newly devised procedures and products to our 

ongoing reconnaissance and MC&G efforts. 

ZfOCEPII 'CA: MOLD 

LIcuicnant General, USAF 

CROUP 1 

&chided from automatic 

downgrading and doolassirscatmo '
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 131523 & (12) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131523 COA: 269434 Clinton CC: 84-004055-FC KENNETH M. WOJNICZ, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to ap peal the May 17, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). The motion to remand is
DENIED.

s1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY 

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD 

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498 

 OFFICE OF 

 AIR AND RADIATION 

July 22, 2011 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Stakeholder Call Log 

FROM: Cleophas Jackson 

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162 

The attached summary document to this memorandum documents telephone calls between 

Cleophas Jackson and various stakeholders. 

Attachment: (1)
.. ; ~~ -· - .... ·::. '-···--,. .... ::.'): .. ' .,,,.:-~ ... ..,..-·· 

~· e{_e_;_ ;Jt>I!- ~~·-'f{J_:z. f :~t;:~ ::~~ -fk ~ /t1c~. t-:-4 ~-!' ~i~ cnu> ~ 

,,~_v~ ~e: 7 b ('A/t:J./l.,C~ )· ~~ .fJ ~~J11-·. ·---~~~.r ~(-.-;-)i /<. A~(-?'-)~~ ~~~1~: 

REF ID:A66041
# CE2004078EN.01057801.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/578 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/578

---

(2004/C 78 E/0610)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3529/03

by Claude Moraes (PSE) to the Commission

(28 November 2003)

Subject:   Amnesty International and Oxfam report on arms control

Subject:

Has the European Commission seen or does it have any plans to respond to the report by Amnesty International and Oxfam entitled ‘Shattered Lives: The Case for Tough International Arms Control’?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(6 January 2004)

(6 January 2004)

The Commission has received a copy of the report which it has acknowledged.

Member States have up to now, on the basis of Article 296 (ex-Article 223) of the EC Treaty exempted the trade in arms from the scope of application of treaty rules. Thus, there is for the time being no Community legislation on trade in arms. The arms trade is currently considered in the context of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), to which the Commission is fully associated.

The Commission is active in broader Union work against the spread of small arms. The report refers to a number of Union initiatives and projects. The Union recognises the need for continued action and has earmarked substantial funds for the provision of financial and technical assistance to programmes around the world implemented by the Commission. In May 2003, moreover, a EUR 2 million small arms project in Tanzania was financed from the European Development Fund. Similar projects in African, Caribbean and Pacific countries may be supported upon request by recipient countries.

In this context, the Commission will carefully examine the steps proposed in the report.

The Commission has assured the authors of its continued support of their goal of a safer future for all.

---
T(Jtll~625-

?4 

USCIB: 29.17/6 

13 April 1954 

'i'OP SEJ0RJ!l'f 

EO 3,3(h) (2) 

MEMORANDUM. FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Subject: U.S.-U.K. 

Reference: USCIB 29.17/3 dated 2 April 1954. 

The enclosure is forwarded for information pursuant to the decision 

reached at the 10.2nd Meeting of USCIB. 

Enclosure 

Copy of CIB # 000121 dtd 12 Apr 54. 

USCIB: 29.17/6 

eclassified and a roved for release b NSA on 05-02-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352 
. _,, 

Toti S!Oit!iT 

MEMORANPUM FOR THE CHAIRMAN, LSIB: 

Subject: u.s.-u.K.J 

CIB # 000121 

12 April 1954 

EO. 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

PL~6~36/50 USC 3605 

\ 

1. Over the past f'ew years both the U.S. and the U.K. have estab: 

lished independent! __ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~__. 

within the scope or Appendix "P" to the UKUSA Agreement. In recent 

months it has become clear that some extension of those arrangements 

would prove bene.ficial to our mutual effort in the OOMINT field and 

certain suggestions toward that objective have been offered. 

2. Our Board is of the opinion that, rather than approve requests 

for extension of the several existing arrangements, perhaps the time 

has come for representatives of both USCIB and LSIB to \.discuss the broad 

roblem or u.s. and U.K. 

As you know, sue a 1scuss on wo necessar y ave o be 

limited to COMINT, inasmuch as ELINT is not within the purview of USCIB. 

3. If your Board. should be favorably disposed towarj a review of 

our I I should 

like to propose that the Director, GCHQ, and Director, NSA, undertake 

to prepare a mutually acceptable agenda for a conference on this subject 

and to work out the details of time and location. The agenda would, or 

course, be referred to each Board for approval prior to convening the 

actual conference. 

Enclosure with USCIB 29.17/6 dtd 13 Apr 54. 

f'o-P SBORB"F 

(Signed) 

ALLEN w I DULLES 

Chairman