alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Memorandum for the Record

Subject: Meeting with Novolyte and TSG on the Glyme SNUR on 18 August 2011

Participants: Jim Love, Novolyte Joe Valcho, Novolyte Amy Breedlove, EPA/CCD Jennifer Seed, EPA/Risk Assessment Division Susan Sharkey, EPA/CCD Saadia Eltayeb, Technology Sciences Group (TSG) Beth Mileson, TSG Will Pettit, TSG

The purpose of the meeting was for Novolyte to pr ovide EPA with information about the glymes they produce. Novolyte mentioned that they pro duce 8 of the 14 glymes listed in the SNUR.

They and TSG walked through a briefing (which ha s been placed in the docket) which described which glymes are produced by Novolyte, informa tion on the uses of glymes, how glymes are used in various products, and some toxicity information for various glymes.

They mentioned that many of the toxicity stud ies are rather old and it was proving difficult to find the full studies, rather than ju st the abstracts, and that more time is needed to locate the full studies. They planned to submit a request for an extension of the comment period.

Amy Breedlove

US EPA

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

Chemical Control Division Existing Chemicals Branch

202-564-9823
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Paul Burgess, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Science Dynamics
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

      (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made
known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

      (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions);

      (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

May 17, 2005

/s/ Paul Burgess
-----------------------
Paul Burgess
Chief Executive Officer
NO. 07-09-0100-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	MAY 5, 2009

	______________________________

	GRACE EMILY ARCHER, M.D.,

									Appellant

	V.

	PETERSON FARRIS MOSS PRUITT & PARKER, P.C.,

	f/k/a PETERSON FARRIS DOORES & JONES, P.C.

	and CHARLES E. MOSS,

									Appellees

											_________________________________

	FROM THE 108th DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 91,411-E; HONORABLE DOUGLAS WOODBURN, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

			       _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

	Appellant, by and through her attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss. Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and dismiss the appeal.  Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

							Brian Quinn

						          Chief Justice
Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2010

KEMET Electronics Corporation

DelawareKEMET Services Corporation

DelawareKRC Trade Corporation

DelawareThe Forest Electric Company

IllinoisKEMET de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.

MexicoKEMET Electronics (Canada) Limited

CanadaKEMET Electronics, S.A.

SwitzerlandKEMET Electronics GmbH

GermanyKEMET Electronics SAS

FranceKEMET Electronics Portugal, S.A.

PortugalKEMET Electronics Asia Pacific Pte Ltd.

SingaporeKEMET Electronics Marketing (S) Pte Ltd.

SingaporeKEMET Electronics Asia Limited

Hong KongKEMET Electronics Greater China Limited

Hong KongKEMET Electronics (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.

People's Republic of ChinaKEMET Electronics Japan Co., Ltd.

JapanKEMET Electronics Pty Ltd.

AustraliaKEMET Tantalum Pty Ltd.

AustraliaEvox Rifa Group Oy

FinlandEvox Rifa Oy

FinlandBHC Components Ltd.

United KingdomEvox Rifa Pte Ltd.

SingaporeEvox Rifa AB

SwedenNantong Evox Rifa Electrolytics Co. Ltd.

People's Republic of ChinaSeoryong Singapore Pte. Ltd.

SingaporeKEMET Electronics (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.

MalaysiaDectron AB

SwedenP.T. Evox Rifa Indonesia

IndonesiaArcotronics Italia S.p.A.

ItalyArcotronics Industries S.r.l.

ItalyKEMET Components GmbH

GermanyShanghai Arcotronics Components & Machineries Co., Ltd.

People's Republic of ChinaArcotronics Technologies S.r.l.

ItalyArcotronics Hightech S.r.l.

ItalyKEMET Electronics Bulgaria EAD

Bulgaria


---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1
                                                                                
                                  LYCOS, INC.

                Computation of Shares Used in Computing Basic 
                    and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Share
                                  (Unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Three Months Ended                          Six Months Ended
                                                        January 31,                               January 31,
                                               ---------------------------------        -----------------------------------
                                                    1999                 1998               1999                 1998
                                               -----------           -----------        ------------            -----------
                                                (Restated)                                (Restated)
<S>                                           <C>                   <C>                <C>                     <C> 

 Common stock, beginning of period.......       41,909,950            28,190,746          38,282,762             27,593,240
 Weighted average common shares
    issued during the period, net........        1,046,456               318,754           4,150,416                756,883
 Common stock options and warrants using
  the treasury stock method..............               --             1,128,948                  --              1,065,496
                                              ------------           -----------        ------------            -----------
                                                42,956,406            29,638,448          42,433,178             29,415,619
                                              ============           ===========        ============            ===========
Net income (loss)........................     $(13,752,650)          $   301,119        $(17,348,583)           $   408,599
                                              ============           ===========        ============            ===========
Basic and diluted net income (loss)                                                                                         
       per share.........................     $      (0.32)                $0.01        $      (0.41)                 $0.01 
                                              ============           ===========        ============            ===========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           871,493
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          853,541
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            853,541
<EQUITIES>                                     110,378
<MORTGAGE>                                       9,848
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               2,054,594
<CASH>                                           7,579
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             217,317
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         416,615
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,499,398
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                297,309
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          1,304,650
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 513,867
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            5,822
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                241,811
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    115,000
<COMMON>                                        20,816
<OTHER-SE>                                     621,781
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,499,398
<PREMIUMS>                                     728,786
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             65,448
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               5,034
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  11,653
<BENEFITS>                                     272,928
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 77,485
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,448
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             55,037
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    55,037
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.35
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
----

----

II Aktid, mille avaldamine ei ole kohustuslik

Komisjon

Euroopa ühenduste võõrtöötajate sotsiaalkindlustuse halduskomisjon

----

OTSUS nr 204,

6. oktoober 2005,

näidisvormide kohta, mis on vajalikud nõukogu määruste (EMÜ) nr 1408/71 ja (EMÜ) nr 574/72 (seeria E 200) kohaldamiseks

(EMPs ja EL/Šveitsi kokkuleppe puhul kohaldatav tekst)

(2006/613/EÜ)

VÕÕRTÖÖTAJATE SOTSIAALKINDLUSTUSE HALDUSKOMISJON,

võttes arvesse nõukogu 14. juuni 1971. aasta määruse (EMÜ) nr 1408/71 (1) artikli 81 punkti a sotsiaalkindlustusskeemide kohaldamise kohta ühenduse piires liikuvate töötajate, füüsilisest isikust ettevõtjate ja nende pereliikmete suhtes, mille kohaselt halduskomisjoni ülesanne on tegeleda kõigi määruse (EMÜ) nr 1408/71 ja sellele järgnevate määruste sätetest tulenevate haldusküsimustega,

võttes arvesse määruse (EMÜ) nr 574/72 (2) (millega määratakse kindlaks määruse (EMÜ) nr 1408/71 rakendamise kord) artikli 2 lõiget 1, mille kohaselt on halduskomisjoni ülesanne koostada määruste (EMÜ) nr 1408/71 ja (EMÜ) nr 574/72 kohaldamiseks vajalike dokumentide näidised,

võttes arvesse 10. detsembri 2001. aasta otsust nr 184, (3) mis käsitleb nõukogu määruste (EMÜ) nr 1408/71 ja (EMÜ) nr 574/72 kohaldamiseks vajalikke näidisvorme (E 201–E 207, E 213 ja E 215),

võttes arvesse 10. detsembri 2002. aasta otsust nr 188, (4) mis käsitleb nõukogu määruse (EMÜ) nr 574/72 kohaldamiseks vajalikke näidisvorme (E 210 ja E 211),

ning arvestades järgmist:

ON VASTU VÕTNUD JÄRGMISE OTSUSE:

Halduskomisjoni eesistuja

Anna HUDZIECZECK

----

(1)EÜT L 149, 5.7.1971, lk 2. Määrust on viimati muudetud Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määrusega (EÜ) nr 647/2005 (ELT L 117, 4.5.2005, lk 1).

(2)EÜT L 74, 27.3.1972, lk 1. Määrust on viimati muudetud Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määrusega (EÜ) nr 647/2005.

(3)EÜT L 304, 6.11.2002, lk 1. Parandatud väljaandes EÜT L 315, 19.11.2002, lk 22.

(4)ELT L 112, 6.5.2003, lk 12.

----

----
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November      14, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Stephen K. Onody                                                                                               |
|-----------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |   | Stephen      K. OnodyPresident,      Interim Chief Executive Officer,Principal      Financial Officer and Director |
|                              |   |                                                                                                               |
Approved for Release: 2017/08/21 C05100025 ..... 

C 2737· THR HE 

·50X1 

Approved for Release: 2017/08/21 C05100025
Exhibit 23.8

Consent of Cameron McKinnon

I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of North American Palladium Ltd., which is being filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission, of references to my name and references to my involvement in the preparation of Technical Report for Lac des Iles Mine, Ontario, Incorporating Prefeasibility Study for Life of Mine Plan (effective
date of March 21, 2014) included in the 2013 Annual Information Form of North American Palladium Ltd., dated March 31, 2014 (the AIF).

I also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-13766) and in the Registration
Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-185656) of the references to my name and the above-mentioned information in the AIF.

Dated this
31st day of March, 2014.



|     |  |                             
|---- |  | ----------------------------
|     | 
|Per: |  | /s/ Cameron McKinnon, P.Eng.
|     |  | Cameron McKinnon, P.Eng.    
|     |  | Metallurgical Engineer      
|     |  | Tetra Tech WEI Inc.
Regulatory Evaluation ~ g 1 1? {tQI y 

Docket No. FAA- 0~ LtY' ~l'1 <J..OlY .. cE-o31-t=.-0 

\ 0 ( 1 Directorate Identifier: -AD 

If you make changes to the values in the table below. you must ensure the totals update accordingly. lf 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost 

replacement) (include cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet 

Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Inspection 4.0 6 

' !Ill [i 'ot) 

,. I 'I· ! (J 'il 

I i o1 

I . ' IJ 'til 

!, 1, ·n 

i ; II ,; 

(II I! (Iii tl • li l 

' lj Il 

q ' ll 

I' [II II' I ooll 

' I' I 

I (, 1: 

I I ,Ill I )il 

' I , ,' 

t l,c' II {h) 

c ()t i.. llfi I !IO 

... ·, i 

t. ;J l 

fl l .flt ' ., : 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $2,040 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

testing, and close- replacement) up) 

Replacement 4 ., · .. $600 

,, '· ,,, . •· I 

:> ( I 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 
Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? @ 

YES* D N0[8] 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? G 

YES* D N0[8] 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. G 

YES D N0[8] 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? @ 

YES* D N0[8] 

*Explanation:
August 19, 2015

Memorandum to the Utah SIP File

Docket ID # EPA-R08-OAR-2015-0463

Subject: Utah Regional Haze, July 20, 2015 Regional Administrator Conference Call

From: Gail Fallon, Environmental Engineer, Air Pro gram Environmental Protection Agency Region 8

Purpose:

This memorandum is to document a call conducted on Monday, July 20, 2015. Participants on the call included Shaun McGrath and myself with EPA Region 8, Debbie Jordan with EPA OAR, and Abigail Dillen and Jenny Harbine with Eart hjustice. The call was requested by Earthjustice to walk through a July 8, 2015 letter that they sent to EPA’s Janet McCabe. The subject of the letter is, “Regional Haze Implementa tion for Utah Sources.” The letter, which is included in the docket, outlines concerns from the Sierra Club and the National Parks Conservation Association regarding Utah’s regional haze plan.

Outcome:

During the call, EPA acknowledged the concerns of t he parties to the July 8, 2015 letter and used the call to express our appreciation of the conserv ation group’s efforts and to serve as a courtesy response instead of providing a response letter.
**EXHIBIT(10)(b)**

 

**FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED ANDRESTATED**

**CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT**

 

****THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT, made this 13th day ofNovember, 2002, by and between **C-COR.net CORP.**, a Pennsylvania corporation (the “Company”), and **DAVID A. WOODLE** (“Employee”). 

 

**BACKGROUND**

 

****A. Employee and the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Change of Control Agreement on June 18, 2002 (the“Agreement”), which Agreement provides certain measures and protections for Employee in the event of a change of control of the Company. 

 

B. The Company and Employee mutually desire to amend the Agreement to extend the measures and protections for Employee under Section 3 ofthe Agreement. 

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties tothis First Amendment to Amended and Restated Change of Control Agreement, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows: 

 

1. Sections 3 (a) (i) and (ii) of the Agreement shall be amended to delete the language “two (2) times” and “twotimes” where either phrase is used and replace such language with “five (5) times.” 

 

2. Section 3(b) of the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: 

 

“(b) Employee shall be entitled to receive an amount of cash equal to five (5) times theaverage of the Profit Incentive Plan or the successor to such plan (“PIP”) payments of the last five (5) years awarded to him/her under the PIP of the Company, pursuant to the terms of such PIP as in effect immediately prior to such changein control. Such amount will be paid to the Employee within ten (10) days after termination of employment. If the Employee has not received PIP payments 

 

for twenty(20) full quarters at the officer level, the average annual PIP will be calculated by averaging the number of full quarters for which Employee’s officer level PIP has been accrued (whether already paid or not paid) and annualizing thatamount.” 

 

3. Section 3(c) of the Agreementshall be amended to delete the language “24 months” and replace such language with “five (5) years.” 

 

4. In all other respects, the Agreement is ratified and affirmed and shall continue in accordance with its terms. 

 

5. This First Amendment to Amended and Restated Change ofControl Agreement shall be binding upon the successors, heirs, personal representatives and assigns of each party. 

 

COMPANY:

 

**C-COR.net CORP.**

By: /s/  Donald M. Cook

Title: Chairman, Compensation Committee

 

 

EMPLOYEE:

 

/s/  David A. Woodle

DAVID A. WOODLE
**Exhibit32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of theundersigned officers of Supreme Industries, Inc. (the “Company”), does herebycertify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 2007 (the “Form10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 
| DATE: November 13, 2007 | /s/ Jeffery D. Mowery   |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                    | Jeffery D. Mowery       |   |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Qpursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as partof the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of theCompany, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing.

 

 

 

----