alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            1131
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1633
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        393
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3285
<PP&E>                                             858
<DEPRECIATION>                                     352
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              649
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           178
<OTHER-SE>                                        4030
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      4679
<SALES>                                           3548
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3548
<CGS>                                             1284
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1284
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1935
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    337
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                337
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       337
<EPS-BASIC>                                     .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .02


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT  99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of St. Joseph Capital Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I, John
W. Rosenthal, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ John W. Rosenthal
------------------------

John W. Rosenthal
Chief Executive Officer


March 24, 2003
# CE2004084EN.01013502.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/135 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/135

---

(2004/C 84 E/0174)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-4033/03

by Maurizio Turco (NI) to the Commission

(12 January 2004)

Subject:   Censoring of the word ‘condom’ in the Commission's official press release to mark World Aids Day at the request of Mr Prodi's office

Subject:

The 11-17 December 2003 edition of the weekly ‘European Voice’ published an article entitled ‘Prodi bans condoms’, according to which the Commission's press service was about to publish an official press release to mark World Aids Day when a telephone call came from Mr Prodi's office with orders to delete the word ‘condom’ from the statement.

In his answer of 10 December 2003 to written question E-3115/03 (1) the Commissioner Christopher Patten said ‘On the basis of research conducted during the last 15 years and partly funded by the Community, it can be claimed that condoms, when used properly, are an effective means of preventing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission, with an efficacy close to 100 %’.

1

Can the Commission say:

| — | whether the report published in the ‘European Voice’ is true; |
| --- | --- |

—

whether the report published in the ‘European Voice’ is true;

| — | if so, what prompted President Prodi's office to remove the word ‘condom’ from the press release; |
| --- | --- |

—

if so, what prompted President Prodi's office to remove the word ‘condom’ from the press release;

| — | if Mr Prodi's office does not have access to any scientific findings contradicting those quoted by the Commissioner, on the basis of what political assessment was the word ‘condom’ deleted from the press release? |
| --- | --- |

—

if Mr Prodi's office does not have access to any scientific findings contradicting those quoted by the Commissioner, on the basis of what political assessment was the word ‘condom’ deleted from the press release?

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(6 February 2004)

(6 February 2004)

The Commission did not consider it worthwhile to refute the claims of the newspaper mentioned since its position on this question has long been clear.

For example, it would refer to its answer to Written Question E-3115/03 by Mr Turco (2) and to its press release of 20 October 2003 entitled ‘HIV/AIDS: European research provides clear proof that HIV virus cannot pass through condoms’ (3). This document, which is being sent direct to the Honourable Member and to Parliament's Secretariat, covers the results of research projects financed by the Directorate-General for Research (RTD) over the last fifteen years. All the available data confirm that condoms are extremely effective in preventing HIV transmission.

2

3

---

(1)  See page 50.

1

(2)  See page 50.

2

(3)  http://europa.eu.int/rapid/cgi/rapcgi.ksh?p_action.gettxt=gt&doc=IP/03/1410|0|AGED&lg=EN&display=

3

---
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105 - 2498

**ME MORA**  **NDUM** SUBJECT: Heavy- Duty Hy brid Onboard Diagnostics FROM: Am y Kopin TO: The Docket DATE: July

21, 2011 

### On March 28 th 

### , 2011 we held a conference call with Li sa A. Stegink of the Engine Manufacturers Association (EMA) to discuss concerns raised by members of EMA regarding heavy- duty

onboard diagnostic (OBD) requirements and timing . EMA members raised concern s during the comment period for the heavy- duty greenhouse gas notice of proposed rulemaking that heavy- duty

hy brid applicat ions may not be able to meet the 2013 heavy- duty OBD regulations that were published in the 2009 OBD Final Rulemaking. 1 , 2 

### Specifically , their comments include a request for a delay

of the application of HD OBD requirements for hy brid applications until 2 020. Attendees from the EPA included Cleophas Jackson, Anthony Neam, and Amy

Kopin.

1 U.S. EPA, NHTSA, and DOT, “Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium and Heavy - Duty Engines and Vehicles,” republished December 29, 20 10. Available here: http://origin.www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR - 2010 - 12 - 29/html/2010 - 32726.htm 2 U.S. EPA, “Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicles Engines; Final Rule Regulations Requiring Onboard Diagnostic Systems on 2010 an d Later Heavy - Duty Engines Used in Highway Applications Over 14,000 Pounds; Revisions to Onboard Diagnostic Requirements for Diesel Highway Heavy - Duty Vehicles Under 14,000 Pounds ,” published February 24, 2009. Available here: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs /im/obd/regtech/hd - obd - frm - 02 - 24 - 09 - notice - 74 - fr - 8310.pdf OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

E. W., :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 1312 C.D. 2018

:

Department of Human Services, :

Respondent : CASE SEALED

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 4

th day of October, 2019, the opinion and order filed 

in this matter on October 2, 2019, is hereby WITHDRAWN. The Court will file a 

new opinion and order in due course.

_____________________________________

BONNIE BRIGANCE LEADBETTER,

Senior Judge
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


The Board of Directors
netGuru, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
333-111017, 333-29747, 333-72095, and 333-84184) on Form S-8 and in the
Registration Statements (Nos. 333-112181, 333-109517, 333-100651, 333-40564,
333-51406, and 333-124920) on Form S-3 of netGuru, Inc. of our report dated June
26, 2006, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of netGuru, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive loss and cash flows for each
of the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, which report appears in the March
31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-KSB of netGuru, Inc. Our report dated June 26,
2006 contains an explanatory paragraph that states the Company has experienced
losses and negative cash flows from operations, sold a significant portion of
its operating assets and made a partial liquidating distribution to stockholders
during the year ended March 31, 2006 and is contemplating the sale of additional
operating assets. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do
not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that
uncertainty.



                                                         /s/ Haskell & White LLP
Irvine, California
June 29, 2006
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

MICROS SYSTEMS, INC.

 

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002)

 

I, Gary C. Kaufman, ExecutiveVice President of Finance and Administration and the Chief Financial Officer ofMICROS Systems, Inc. (“Registrant”), certify that to the best of my knowledge,based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2004 of the Registrant (the “Report”):

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
|   | /s/  | Gary C.  Kaufman  |   |
|--------|-----------|-------------------|--------|
|   | Name:     | Gary C.  Kaufman  |
|   | Date:     | November 9,  2004 |

 

----
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

April 7, 2009

Before

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

No.  06‐2405

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff‐Appellee,

v.

DEONDERY CHAMBERS,

Defendant‐Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Southern District of

Illinois.

No. 4:05‐cr‐40444‐JLF

G. Patrick Murphy, Judge.

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the statements of position submitted by the parties in this

case, which has been remanded to this court by the Supreme Court, Chambers v. United

States, 129 S. Ct. 687 (2009). we remand this case to the district court for resentencing of the

defendant in accordance with the Supreme Courtʹs decision and the procedures set forth in

Nelson v. United States, 129 S. Ct. 890 (2009); Gall v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 586 (2007), and

Kimbrough v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 558 (2007), which allow a defendant in a resentencing

proceeding to raise a new argument based on statutes or judicial decisions that postdate his

original sentencing, provided they are not foreclosed by the decision in his appeal from his

original, vacated sentence,

So Ordered.

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

 Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
Exhibit (32)(2)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of C-COR.net Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 26, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William T. Hanelly, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 that, to my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/ WILLIAM T. HANELLY 
|-----------------------
|William T. Hanelly     
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 7, 2003
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael J. McCann, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Petroleum
Helicopters, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         1.       the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
                  September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
                  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies
                  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company for the period covered by such
                  Report.


Dated: November 9, 2004

                                     By:  /s/ Michael J. McCann
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Michael J. McCann
                                          Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### Bacon, Appellant, vs. City of Antigo, Respondent.

*April 5*

*April 25, 1899.*

*Municipal corporations: Antigo city charter: Presentation of claim to council.*

The provision of sec. 139, ch. 197, Laws of 1889, that no action in tort shall lie or be maintained against the city of Antigo, “unless a statement in writing , , . shall be presented to the common council within sixty days after the occurring or happening of the tort alleged,” is satisfied by the filing of such statement with the city clerk within the prescribed time.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Langlade county: John Goodland, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed.*

The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *Wu F. White,*attorney, and *Webster & Classon,*of counsel, •and for the respondent on that of *Mm Hoffman.*

Winslow, J.

The plaintiff brought action against the city for personal injuries suffered on account of a defective sidewalk upon a street in the defendant city, and alleged service •of a notice of the injury by filing the same with the city clerk, for presentation to the city council, within sixty days after the injury. Upon the trial, a general demurrer *ore tenus*to the complaint was sustained, on the ground that the complaint did not allege the presentation of the claim to the common council.

*11The charter of the city provides (Laws of 1889, ch. 197, sec. 139) that no action in tort shall lie or be maintained against the city, “ unless a statement in writing signed by the person injured or claiming to be injured, of the wrong and circumstances thereof, and the amount of damages claimed shall be presented to the common council within sixty days after the occurring or happening of. the tort alleged.”

The trial court held that filing the- claim with the city clerk for presentation to the council did not satisfy this provision. This holding was, we think, erroneous. The city clerk is the custodian of all the papers and records of the city, and required to attend all meetings of the council, and keep a correct record of its proceedings. Sec. 58, ch. 197, Laws of 1889. It is his manifest duty to place before the council all claims of the nature of the one before us which are filed with him for presentation to the council. There is no other orderly way in which a claimant can make sure of presentation of his claim to the council. If he must wait until a meeting of the council is held and present it in open meeting, he might be denied an opportunity to present it at all, by mere failure of the council to meet; and he might also be denied the full sixty days’ time which the statute gives him in which to present it. This view is in accord with the construction given to similar provisions of statute in the cases of *Parish v.*Eden, 62 Wis. 272, and *Mason v.*Ashland, 98 Wis. 540, although at variance with the holding in *Hiner v. Fond du*Lae, 71 Wis. 74, which latter case must be considered as overruled upon this question.

*By the*GouH.— Judgment reversed, and action remanded for a new trial.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-94831, 333-93939, 333-93937, 333-87355, 333-65933 and 333-18047 of Twinlab
Corporation each on Form S-8 of our report dated February 10, 2000, appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Twinlab Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 1999.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Jericho, New York
March 27, 2000
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements pertaining to the ZOLL Medical Corporation 1992 Stock Option Plan(Form S-8 No. 333-68403, Form S-8 No. 33-90764, Form S-8 No. 33-56244, and Form S-8 No. 333-101839), the Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan (Form S-8 333-101839) and the 401(k) Saving Plan (Form S-8 333-38048) and the ZOLL MedicalCorporation 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-101839) of our report dated November 8, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of ZOLL Medical Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for theyear ended October 3, 2004. 

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

December 16, 2004 

Boston, Massachusetts 

 

ADD S-8 filed Nov 2004
United States Court of Appeals 

For the First Circuit 

No. 14-1110 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Appellee, 

v. 

SEAN BROWN, 

Defendant, Appellant. 

ERRATA SHEET 

The opinion of this Court issued on November 4, 2015, is 

amended as follows: 

On page 4, footnote 1, line 2, "Testified" should be 

"testified."
1 539 S.W .2d 340, 344-45 (T enn. Crim. Ap p. 1976).
2 In this instance, a curative instruction by the judge would have only served to bri ng more attention an d focus to the imp roper comm ent. 

# FILED

May 7, 1997 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CRIMI NAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE APRIL 1995 SESSION

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) Appellee, ) No. 01C01-9412-CC-00406 ) ) Maury County v. ) ) Hon. Jim T. Ham ilton, Judge ) RANDY ANDERSON, ) (Aggravated Burg lary and Theft over $1,000) ) Appellant. )

DISSENTING OPINION
I respectfully disagr

ee with my colleag ues in this case. I do not believe that the prosecutor 's remarks concerning

the appellant's intention to plead guilty prejudi ced him or deprived him of a fair trial. As pointed out by the majority, Judge v. State 1 provides five factors t o be considered in assessin g the prejudicial effect of improper arg ument. The five factors are: 1. The conduct complained of view ed in context and in lig ht of the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. The curative measures under taken by the court and the pr osecution. 3. The intent of the prosecutor in mak ing the improper statement. 4. The cumulative effect of the improper c onduct and any other errors in the record. 5. The relative strengt h or weakness of the case.
Four of these five requir ements, in the context of this c ase, tend to establish that the improper conduct did not aff ect the verdict. The trial court did not give a curative instruction regarding the improper comments. 2 However, the record reveals that the

intent of the prosecutor was not malicious. The prosecutor was only articulating a conclusion that he wanted the jury to reachregarding the appellant. Furthermore, the record d oes not indicate that the appellant's trial wa

s tainted with error

s. I see no compounding or cu mulation of prejudice when this i mproper comment is considered i n light of the entire recor d.

I find that the

evidence p roffered agai nst the appel lant was s trong. To detract nothing from a competent prosecutor, I am very skeptical that his improper comments removed all traces of reasonable doubt from the mind s of the jury. Therefore, I w ould affirm the convictions.

__________________________ PAUL G. SUMMERS, Ju dge
##### 



EXHIBIT 32

EMULEX CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emulex Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 28, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Paul F. Folino, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Paul F. Folino     
|                       
|Paul F. Folino         
|Chief Executive Officer
|November 10, 2003      

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emulex Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 28, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Michael J. Rockenbach, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Michael J. Rockenbach
|                         
|Michael J. Rockenbach    
|Chief Financial Officer  
|November 10, 2003        

43
1 NAME OR TITLE 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION DATE 

2 

3 

4 

COORDINATION 

FILE 

INFORMATION 

NECESSARY 

ACTION 

NOTE AND RETURN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 
~ ":. .. ' .. .. .. 

~~~I 

- - - -- . REF-~In:·A-65·8-3~~- + 

~h·" A I. ~ ~ Cdll~f "L 

t2UJ~~ 

~L~ le.A/~. 

h -·- - -· ' 

!" ~~ . -······ . -o