alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Munk and wife, Respondents, vs. Anderson and wife, Appellants.

*September 4*

September *22, 1896.*

*Appeal: Time for perfecting.*

Unless the record shows that an appeal was perfected within the time and in the manner prescribed by secs. 3039, 3049, E. S., this court has no jurisdiction to entertain it.

Appeal from a judgment of the county court of Winnebago county: C. D. OlevelaNd, Judge.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Action to revive and foreclose a mortgage, and for other equitable relief. The facts necessary to an understanding of this appeal are stated in the opinion.

*Byron S. Sanders,*for the appellants.

For the respondents there was a brief by *Wesley Mott*and *Henry Fitzgibbon,*and oral argument by *Mr. Mott.*

Marshall, J.

The judgment appealed from ivas duly perfected on the 6th day of September, 1892. Notice of the entry of such judgment was served on appellants’ attorneys on the 8th day of September, 1892. Notice of the appeal was served on respondents’ attorneys on the 16th day of August, 1891. The undertaking for costs was served on the 16th day of December, 1894, more than two years after the *28entry of judgment. No deposit of money was made in lieu of such undertaking, nor was there any waiver, in any way, of such undertaking or deposit. Such being the record, the respondents’ attorneys moved the court to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction of the court to entertain it.

The motion to dismiss must be granted. Sec. 8049, R. S., provides that: *“*An appeal must be taken by serving a notice, in writing, signed by the appellant or his attorney, on the adverse party, and on the clerk of the court, in which the judgment or order appealed from is entered. . . . The appeal shall be deemed taken by the service of the notice of appeal, and perfected on service of the undertaking for costs, or the deposit of money instead, or the waiver thereof, as hereinafter prescribed.” Sec. 3051 provides that such waiver may be made in writing. Under sec. 8039, R. S., the time limited for taking the appeal is two years from the entry of judgment *(Parker v.*McAvoy, 36 Wis. 322), and such time cannot be extended in any.manner. Hence, unless the record shows the appeal perfected within the time and in the manner.so provided, this court cannot obtain any jurisdiction to entertain it. *Herrick v Racine W. & D. Co.*43 Wis. 93.

*By the*Court.— The appeal is dismissed.
**Certification      Pursuant To**

**18      U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As      Adopted Pursuant To**

**Section      906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

| (1)    | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September                30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                15 (d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                      |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
| (2)    | The                information contained such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the period ending September 30, 2006 fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the                dates                presented and the results of operations of the                Company. |

| /s/                John X. Adiletta    |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| John                X. Adiletta        |   |
| Chief                Executive Officer |
| Chief                Financial Officer |   |
|                                   |   |   |   |
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on (i) Form S-3 (Nos. 333-25995, 333-62155, 333-33726, 333-54616, 333-60912-01, 333-55866-01, 333-91316-01, 333-102961, 333-102962-01, 333-122424, 333-124471, 333-141491 and 333-142584) and (ii) Form S-8 (Nos. 333-56343 and 333-122168) of Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. of our report dated February 25, 2008 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas

February 25, 2008
# CE2004078EN.01058901.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/589 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/589

---

(2004/C 78 E/0622)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3559/03

by Margrietus van den Berg (PSE) and Jan Wiersma (PSE) to the Commission

(1 December 2003)

Subject:   Groningen Rail Service Centre and non-use of cross-border railway line near Nieuweschans to Northern Germany

Subject:

Why is an EU-funded transhipment station, the Groningen Rail Service Centre, not being used for direct freight transport from and to Northern Germany, Eastern Europe and Scandinavia, with the result that unnecessary detours are being made, the railways are not being put to optimal use and no favours are being done to the environment, either?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(23 January 2004)

(23 January 2004)

The Groningen Rail Service Centre handles approximately 100 000 Twenty foot Equivalent Unit (TEU) per year, and new investments are planned to further develop rail services linking Groningen to the Rotterdam area and other Member States. Growth is notably expected from freight traffic on the so-called Northern corridor, which links the Rotterdam port area with Northern Germany and Scandinavia. The market for freight transport by rail has been opened by Directive 91/440/EEC (1) as amended by Directive 2001/12/EC (2), which provides that freight transport over the Trans European Rail Freight Network (TERFN) shall be opened by 15 March 2003 at the latest to all railway undertakings in possession of a European licence awarded under the framework conditions set by Directive 95/18/EC, as amended by Directive 2001/13/EC (3), and provided the railway undertakings possess the required safety certificates for the countries where rail services are planned. Any railway undertaking that sees an opportunity to operate services on those links can do so. Groningen is located on the TERFN. Within this context though, it must be observed that Directive 91/440/EC, as amended, requires railway undertakings to be managed according to the principles which apply to commercial undertakings.

1

2

3

The development of the Groningen Rail Service Center has been part of priority 1 (Industry, business services and tourism), as set out in the Single Programming Document (SPD) for the Objective 2 areas of Groningen-Drenthe in the Netherlands approved by the Commission in 1997. The contribution from the structural funds for this priority in the 1997-1999 period was 32,4 % (EUR 74,25 million).

---

(1)  Directive 91/440/EEC of 29 July 1991 on the development of the Community's railways, OJ L 237, 24.8.1991.

1

(2)  Directive 2001/12/EC of 26 February 2001 of the Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 amending Council Directive 91/440/EEC on the development of the Community's railways, OJ L 75, 15.3.2001.

2

(3)  Directive 2001/13/EC of 26 February 2001 of the Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 amending Council Directive 95/18/EC on the licensing of railway undertakings, OJ L 75, 15.3.2001.

3

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>             5
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      89,513
<SECURITIES>                             7,890,053
<RECEIVABLES>                           51,524,531
<ALLOWANCES>                            (7,650,000)
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        54,272,884
<PP&E>                                   1,856,365
<DEPRECIATION>                            (257,072)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          75,251,587
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    1,716,090
<BONDS>                                 41,022,138
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    79,548
<OTHER-SE>                              32,433,811
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            75,251,587
<SALES>                                  9,576,042
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         9,576,042
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            8,173,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       2,678,941
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          1,402,538
<INCOME-TAX>                              (311,528)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      1,091,010
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                             1,091,010
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                0.140
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.140
        


</TABLE>
|EXHIBIT 23.01
        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
        Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd.
        Detroit, Michigan
        We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the 1993 Stock Option Plan and the 1999 Equity Participation Plan) (File No. 333-104429) of our reports dated June 7, 2005 relating to the financial statements of Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. at and for the transition period ended March 31, 2005 and for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, and to managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting at March 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting at March 31, 2005, which reports are included in Caracos Transition Report on Form 10-K/T.
        /s/ Rehmann Robson
        Troy, MichiganJune 9, 2005
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|
|
EXHIBIT 11.1

                           Cornell Corrections, Inc.
                Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings
                    (in thousands except per share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                            Year Ended December 31,
                                                                                             1994             1995             1996
                                                                                          -------          -------          -------
<S>                                                                                       <C>              <C>              <C>
Net loss ........................................................................         $  (600)         $  (989)         $(2,379)
                                                                                          =======          =======          =======
Shares used in computing loss per share:
   Weighted average common shares and common share equivalents ..................           2,923            3,188            4,228
   Less treasury shares .........................................................            --                (93)            (555)
   Effect of shares issuable under stock options
     and warrants based on the treasury stock method ............................             888              888              793
                                                                                          -------          -------          -------
                                                                                            3,811            3,983            4,466
                                                                                          -------          -------          -------
 Loss per share .................................................................         $ (0.16)         $ (0.25)         $ (0.53)
                                                                                          =======          =======          =======
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,632,586
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  777,889
<ALLOWANCES>                                    65,179
<INVENTORY>                                    849,293
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,305,673
<PP&E>                                       2,108,775
<DEPRECIATION>                                 972,641
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,565,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          464,836
<BONDS>                                        397,357
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,511
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,596,145
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,565,849
<SALES>                                      3,447,231
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,447,231
<CGS>                                        1,088,631
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,088,631
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,686,832
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                24,486
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,728
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                726,944
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            726,944
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   726,944
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 154 (Friday, August 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 48661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19311]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[OE Docket No. PP-387]

Application for Presidential Permit; Soule River Hydroelectric 
Project: Correction

AGENCY: Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of Application; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Electricity Delivery 
and Energy Reliability corrects a Notice of Application published in 
the Federal Register (76 FR 50726) on July 30, 2013, to revise the DOE 
point of contact and program Web site for Docket No. PP-387.

ADDRESSES: Comments, protests, or motions to intervene should be 
addressed as follows:
    Christopher Lawrence, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy 
Reliability (OE-20), U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence 
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Christopher Lawrence (Program Office) 
at 202-586-5260 or via electronic mail at 
Christopher.Lawrence@hq.doe.gov or Katherine L. Konieczny (Attorney-
Adviser) at 202-586-0503 or via electronic mail at 
Katherine.Konieczny@hq.doe.gov.
    Procedural Matters: Copies of this application will be made 
available, upon request, for public inspection and copying at the 
address provided above, by accessing the program Web site at http://energy.gov/oe/services/electricity-policy-coordination-and-implementation/international-electricity-regulatio-2, or by emailing 
Angela Troy at angela.troy@hq.doe.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 5, 2013.
Brian Mills,
Director, Permitting and Siting, Office of Electricity Delivery and 
Energy Reliability.
[FR Doc. 2013-19311 Filed 8-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

14675 Lee Road 

Chantilly, VA 20151-1715

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release #05-11 

Contact: (703) 808-5050 March 11, 2011 

 

NRO SUCCESSFULLY LAUNCHES ABOARD DELTA IV

A National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) payload was successfully launched 

aboard a United Launch Alliance Delta IV medium rocket from Space Launch 

Complex-37, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida, at 6:38 P.M. EST, on 

March 11, 2011. 

This is the fifth in a series of six launches scheduled during the NRO 50th

Anniversary year in 2010-2011. “I am extremely proud of the entire government 

and contractor team who supported this launch. We have had an amazing five 

successful launches in the past 12 months, two in 2010 and three this year. I am 

looking forward to the launch of NROL-34 in April, which will conclude our most 

aggressive launch schedule in over two decades,” said Col Alan Davis, Director 

of the NRO Office of Space Launch. 

The NRO is a joint Department of Defense-Intelligence Community organization 

responsible for developing, launching, and operating America’s signals, imagery, 

and communications satellites to meet the needs of our Nation. 

–NRO–
Exhibit 23.11  Consent of Des Cullen  I consent to the inclusion in this annual
report on Form 40-F of North American Palladium Ltd., which is being filed
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of references to my
name and to references to my involvement in the preparation of technical
information relating to the Shebandowan West Property, Ontario, included in the
2008 Annual Information Form of North American Palladium Ltd., dated March 16,
2009 (the AIF).  I also consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-10 and amendments
thereto (No. 333-147126) of the references to my name and the
above-mentioned information in the AIF.   Dated this 16thday of March, 2009.(signed) Des CullenName:
  
  Des Cullen, P. Geo.Title:
  
  Consulting Geologist
~ ~~66000--

USCIB: 12./20 

7 July 1955 

EQ 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 8&36/50 USC 3605 

-SE0m!if" 

Ml!MORANDUM FOR THE MliMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Issue of a Class A Cryptosystem to thel ... _______ _. 

Reference: USCIB 12./18 dated 21 June 1955. 

1. While vote sheet replies to the reference indicate that a 

majority of the members approve the action proposed therein by the 

Director, NSA, the members representing the Department of the Army and 

the Department of ..State have requested that the matter be considered 

at the next regular meeting of the Board. 

2. Accordingly, it is requested that the above subject be added to 

the USCIB.Agenda (USCIB 5.2/100) as Item Number 5 for consideration by 

the Board at its 117th meeting, to be held at 1430, on 12 July 1955. 

USCIB 

24 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-01-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

USCIB: 12./20 lf'kNBLE VIA OOMIM'f CHANNELS eNLY 

SECRET
# C_2005069EN.01002202.xml

| 19.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/22

---

Action brought on 4 January 2005 by ReckittBenckiser N.V. against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case T-3/05)

(2005/C 69/41)

Language of the case: English

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 4 January 2005 by ReckittBenckiser N.V., established in Hoofddorp (The Netherlands) represented by G.S.P. Vos, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision of the Board of Appeal of the OHIM; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision of the Board of Appeal of the OHIM;

| — | allow the registration of the Community trade mark application No 1 155 712; |
| --- | --- |

—

allow the registration of the Community trade mark application No 1 155 712;

| — | order the OHIM to pay the costs in accordance with Article 87(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the OHIM to pay the costs in accordance with Article 87(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance.

Pleas in law and main arguments

| Community trade mark concerned: | The three dimensional mark of a white and blue rectangular tablet with an oval red centre for goods in classes 1 and 3 (Chemical products for industrial purposes; bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use and dishwashing,...) - application No 1 156 595 |
| --- | --- |
| Decision of the examiner: | Rejection of the application |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Dismissal of the appeal |
| Pleas in law: | Violation of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 |

Community trade mark concerned:

The three dimensional mark of a white and blue rectangular tablet with an oval red centre for goods in classes 1 and 3 (Chemical products for industrial purposes; bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use and dishwashing,...) - application No 1 156 595

Decision of the examiner:

Rejection of the application

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law:

Violation of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94

---