alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Spy Satellite Processing Helps Combat Breast 

Cancer

13 September 1996 

Washington, D.C. -- Doctors and medical technicians, in their battle against breast cancer, can 

now employ tools used by intelligence analysts.

The tools involve advanced imagery processing and display techniques used in reviewing images 

gathered by spy satellites. The technology was developed by the National Reconnaissance Office 

(NRO), which is responsible for designing, building, and operating U.S. reconnaissance 

satellites. The NRO is a member off the Intelligence Community, consisting of 13 Defense and 

independent agencies who gather and analyze intelligence.

The techniques align satellite images of the same target area. Analysts use them to detect 

changes in facilities, roads, weapons, sites, and other areas of interest. The images, like photos or 

x-rays, are aligned and then digitally analyzed. This process allows imagery analysts to 

determine differences or changes in the location under surveillance.

Radiologists have a similar "needle-in-the-haystack" problem -- trying to find very small cancers 

in mammograms. The medical community has combined its own Computer Assisted Diagnosis 

(CAD) tools with intelligence technology, resulting in significant improvement in detecting 

tumors and reducing the false-alarm rate. This development should help accelerate the clinical 

acceptance and use of these computerized tools, which will help catch cancers earlier and 

potentially save lives.

Through the U.S. Intelligence Community, the NRO is working with the Department of Health 

and Human Services, under the leadership of Dr. Susan J. Blumenthal, Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Health (Women's Health), to expedite the transfer of this technology to the medical 

community. The National Information Display Lab (NIDL) is facilitating the transfer and 

broadening the search for other intelligence tools that could benefit the medical community. The 

NIDL is sponsored by the NRO and is chartered to support the Intelligence Community as a 

whole.
Zero M&B Company Ltd. Order Sheet



 Exhibit 10.8 
 

 
  
 Order Sheet

 ZeroM&B, Corp TEL. 02-545-7745 FAX. 02-546-7745 Feb 18, 2008. 
 Orderer Taxpayer Identification Number Name of Company ZeroM&B Name of Representative Lee Yong Seop 
 Address 13-31 Yeouido-Dong. Yeongdeungpo-Gu, Seoul 
 Type of Business Items of Business 
 Supplier e-Smart Korea, Inc. Address
642-9 Yeoksam-Dong, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul TEL. 02-2185-5887 FAX. 02-2135-5889 
 Price : TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND WON (KRW 200,000) /
VAT not included 
 NO Name of Product Size Unit Quantity Unit Price Price 
 1 IAM Card EA 10 20,000 200,000 
 Total 200,000 
 Reference : 1. Date of Delivery : Negotiable 2. Terms of Payment : Cash 







 

 
  
 e-Smart Korea

 E-SMART KOREA INC. 642-9, Songchon B/D 9F, Yeoksam-dong 
 TEL. +822.2185.5686~8 FAX. +822.2185.5889 Gongnam-gu, Seoul, Korea 
 DELIVERY RECEIPT 
 To: e-Smart Korea Inc. 
 Name of Product Specification Unit Quantity Remarks 
 I AM CARD EA 10 
 Reader EA 10 
 The above products have been duly received. 
 September 10, 2008 
 Name of Company : Zero M&B Co., Ltd. 
 Name : Yong Sup Lee 
 http://www.esmartkorea.com
# CE2004084EN.01008802.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/88 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/88

---

(2004/C 84 E/0104)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3709/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject:   Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Macerata

Subject:

With reference to question E-0965/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of Macerata (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the Altener II programme, the Commission replied to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

1

Can the Commission provide information on any projects submitted since the date of its reply (25 April 2003)?

---

(1)  OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

1

---
24 

USCIB: 4. 2/49 

9 June 1955 

GONFIBEiN'filL 

MJ!MORANDUM. FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIBEC: 

Subject: Periodic Review of Annex A to CIBD #7. 

Reference: CIBD #7 dated 12 May 1955. 

1. ~he USCIB Security Committee, on 2 June 1955, reviewed the list 

of specific areas involving substantial ~isk to CCMINT knowledgeable 

individuals (Annex A to the reference) and have no revisions to recanmend at this time. 

2o The SECCOM agreed to again review subject list within the next 

thirty (.30) days. 

USCIB: 4.2/49 

.· ·-
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

                  CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with amendment no. 2 to the annual report on Form 10-KSB
of netGuru, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002 (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: January 27, 2003                              By: /s/ Amrit K. Das
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Amrit K. Das
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

         In connection with amendment no. 2 to the annual report on Form 10-KSB
of netGuru, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002 (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: January 27, 2003                              By: /s/ Bruce K. Nelson
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Bruce K. Nelson
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
May 7, 2012 Mr. Dennis DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviation Analysis Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE, Washington, D.C. 20590

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

# D c 1-**ofT~** 

# J ('(1 

# '?- cJ-:2

# ocr

l\1/:[JL} STEVE RosENTHAL, MAYOR 101 FrontStreet • P.O. Box 269

Indianola,Mississippi38751 Office: 662.887.1825

Fax: 662.887.6009 Cell: 662.207.0684 coimayor@bellsouth.net

The City of Indianola, Mississippi wishes to lend its support to the proposal of Silver Airways to provide essential airservice at Greenville, Ms as replacement for current Delta Air Lines service. Local air service that provides an effective connection to the national and international air transportation system is critical to the economic well being of the entire Mississippi Delta. The Silver Airways proposals offers the best proposal for air service out ofGreenville, Ms. The size and type airplane as well as service toAtlanta makes this the most logical choice for service. I believe the Silver airservice proposal is our best option to have consistent, dependable and convenient service forthe Delta. 1/we urge the DepartmentofTransportation to award Silver Airways the designation to provide Greenville, MS and the Mississippi Delta essential airservice. Best regards,

# ~if~ Steve Rosenthal
### Regulatory Evaluation



### ~ g 1 1? {tQI 

## y
Docket No. 

### FAA-



### 0~ 

# LtY' 

# ~l'1 <J..OlY .. 

# cE-o31-t=.-0 \ 0 ( 1 Directorate Identifier:
- AD 

### If

you make changes to the values in the t a ble below. yo u must ensur e the totals update accordingly. 

## lf they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the cha nged cell . Estimated Costs : Action Costs per Product (e.g. , aircraft, engine, (e.g. , Inspection, propeller, appliance) Work

-hours La bor Pa rts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement ) (include cost (labor + 

## u.s. for U.S . Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products 

### Inspection 4.0 

### 6 ' !Ill [i 'ot) 

### ,. I 'I · ! (J 'il I i o1 I 

# . ' IJ 'til !, 1, 

### ·n i ; II ,; (II I! (Iii tl • li l ' lj Il

q ' ll I' [II II' I ooll ' I' I

I (, 1: I I ,Ill I )il 

# ' I , ,' t l,c' II {h) 

## c ()t i.. llfi I !IO

... ·, i t. ;J l

fl l .flt ' ., :

The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of complianc e for U.S. fleet: $2,040 Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ On-Condition Costs: Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) testing, and close

- replacement) up) 

### Replacement 4 

# ., · .. $600



# ,, '· 

### ,,, 

# . •· I :> ( I 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assum ed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain w arranty costs):

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be co n sidered a "sign ificant regulatory action "? 

## @ YES* 

## D N0[8] *Explanation: 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? 

# G YES* 

# D N0[8] *Explanation: 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic im pact o n a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer . 

# G YES 

## D N0[8] Explanation: 

### Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftransportation? 

## @ YES* 

# D N0[8] *Explanation:
### INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT We ProtectHoosiers and OurEnvironment. MitchellE. Daniels,Jr. 100 North SenateAvenue Governor Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 (317) 232-8603 Thomas WEasterly Toll Free (800) 451-6027 Commissioner . WWw.idem.IN.gov January 4, 2013

Ms. Susan Hedman Regional Administrator U.S. EPA, Region V R-19J 77 West Jackson Boulevard Chicago, Illinois 60604-3507 Dear Ms. Hedman: Re: Proposed inclusion of Keystone Corridor Ground Water· Contamination, Indianapolis, Marion County, Indiana National Priorities List The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) is providing this letterto convey its support to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) reganding the inclusion of Keystone Corridor Ground Water Contamination on the NationalPriorities List 

### (NPL) of hazardous waste sites. Keystone Corridor Ground Water Contamination EPA Identification Number INN000508678, located in Indianapolis, Indiana, consists of several municipal wells that have been impacted with elevated levels ofvolatile organic compounds 

### (VOCs), specifically trichloroethylene 

### (TCE), vinyl chloride, and cis 1,2 dichloroethene. The impacted area is bounded by residential subdivisions and commercial businesses tothe south, east, and north, and Fall Creek to the west. The immediate area surrounding the site consists of multiple industrial facilities and residential dwellings. The source ofthe VOCs has not been fully identified at this point in time. Citizens Water Company is currently monitoring the contamination in their well field. This site qualifies for inclusion on the NPL as: 1)the site meets the National Oil and Hazardous Substance Pollution Contingency Plan 

### (NCP) criteria for listing on the NPL as the site scores sufficiently high pursuant to the Hazard Ranking System (HRS); and 2) the site requires a long-term response action. An NPL listing would allow for the proper and timely investigation ofthe nature and extent of VOG contamination to the residential area and to determine the cleanup alternatives tothe impacted areas and thereby protect the public health and well-being of

RecycledPaper 

## ® An Equal OpportullityEmployerasterly Ms

. Susan Headman Regional Administrator January 4, 2013 Page 2 of 2 the area consumers. The NPL listing appears to be the onlyviable alternative for addressing the existing environmental problems. As the Commissioner ofthe IDEM, I am authorized by Indiana Governor Mitchell E. Daniels to act in these matters on his behalf. I have considered my staff's recommendations and I fully support the designation of Keystone Corridor Ground Water Contamination for inclusion on the 

### NPl. I requestthat the U.S. EPA assign a Remedial Project Manager and/or On-Scene Coordinatorto implement the process
. Ifyou require any additional information or have any questions, please contact Mark Jaworski ofthe Site Investigation Section at

### 317 /

233

-2407

. Sincere , I 

## /

Commissioner
cc: Denise Boone, U.S. EPA Nuria Muniz, U.S. EPA
·e 

'i9P SBSRJ!lf = e. S. BYElS ONE.¥ 

SUBJECT NUMBER 

F, tJA-L 

-mJ!l'.A1'IllE 

USCIB: 2!}.13/8 Item A (Not on Agenda) for the 114th Meeting of USCIB, 

held on 8 April 1955. 

Subject: ~~INT Ca.prility to Provide Early Waming of Attack 

The ACTING CHAIRMAN (General Cabelt) info,ed the members that we 

have acquired further promises from the =regarding the supply of 

additional information. He added, however, that\none of the promised 

material has yet been received. 

The members noted this info:nnation. 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

USCIB: 2!}.13/8 - 10 -

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-24-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

TOP SECRET
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Louis Chaverra, Appellant.

[772 NYS2d 549]

Appeals by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hollie, J.), rendered November 8, 2001, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree under Indictment No. 11190/99, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) an amended judgment of the same court, also rendered November 8, 2001, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court (Cross, J.), upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under Superior Court Information No. 12102/98.

Ordered that the judgment and amended judgment are affirmed.

The defendant’s contentions regarding the allegedly prejudicial comments made by the prosecutor in his summation are unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the prosecutor’s remarks were proper in light of the evidence adduced at trial and as a response to the defense counsel’s summation *(see People v Ashwal,*39 NY2d 105 [1976]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Santucci, J.P., Florio, Schmidt and Mastro, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7749

STEVEN MARTIN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

BRIAN FROSH, in his official capacity as Attorney General; STATE OF 

MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:19-cv-02341-JKB)

Submitted: August 19, 2021 Decided: August 23, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, FLOYD, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Jesse McCants, MCCANTS FIRM, Clinton, Maryland, for Appellant.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Steven Martin seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254 petition for lack of jurisdiction.

* The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate 

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Martin has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED

* Although the district court’s dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is 

without prejudice, we have jurisdiction over this appeal. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC, 959 

F.3d 605, 610-12, 615 (4th Cir. 2020), cert. denied, 141 S. Ct. 1376 (2021).
<PAGE>
 
     _____________________________________________________________________

     _____________________________________________________________________



                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            Washington, D.C.  20549

                                        


                                   FORM 8-K
                                        
                                CURRENT REPORT
                                        

    Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

    Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):  OCTOBER 15, 1998




                            BANKBOSTON CORPORATION
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


 
 
       MASSACHUSETTS                    1-6522                  04-2471221
 (State or other jurisdiction         (Commission              (IRS Employer
      of incorporation)               File Number)           Identification No.)
 

100 FEDERAL STREET, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS                         02110
(Address of principal executive offices)                       (Zip Code)



Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (617) 434-2200



     _____________________________________________________________________
     _____________________________________________________________________
<PAGE>
 
                                      -2-

ITEM 5.  OTHER EVENTS.
----------------------

    On October 15, 1998, BankBoston Corporation (the Corporation) issued a press
release announcing its earnings for the quarter ended September 30, 1998.  The
financial information that is included herewith as Exhibit 99(a) was included in
the Corporation's press release and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.
-------------------------------------------

(c) Exhibits.

99(a)   Financial information included in the Corporation's Press Release dated
October 15, 1998.
<PAGE>
 
                                      -3-




                                  SIGNATURES
                                        


    Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



                                    BANKBOSTON CORPORATION



Dated:  October 16, 1998            /s/ Robert T. Jefferson
                                    -------------------------------
                                    Robert T. Jefferson
                                    Comptroller
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           8,926
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      103
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        127
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,822
<PP&E>                                          10,014
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (3,463)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,246
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,499
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           389
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,249
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,246
<SALES>                                          8,130
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,130
<CGS>                                            1,790
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,790
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  90
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,220)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (725)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,495)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,495)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.27)
        

</TABLE>