alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.5

Consent of Des Cullen

I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of North American Palladium Ltd., which is
being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of references to my name and references to my involvement in the preparation of technical information relating to the
Shebandowan West Property, Ontario, included in the 2009 Annual Information Form of North American Palladium Ltd., dated March 31, 2010 (the "AIF").

I
also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-13766) and in the Registration
Statements on Form F-10 and amendments thereto (File Nos. 333-158082 and 333-164512) of the references to my name and the
above-mentioned information in the AIF.

Dated
this 31st day of March, 2010.



Name:

/s/ DES CULLEN Des Cullen


---
.:---.... - ...... 

USCIB: 9.2/7 

25 October 1954 

'fOP 5Ei0RE1f F'R0'fH 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: CCMINT Capability to Provide Early Waming or Chinese 

Communist Attack on Formosa. 

1. At its Twenty-first Meeting, 22 October 1954, USCIBEC 

considered the above subject, with particular reference to the Intelligence Committee Report contained in USCIB 9.2/6. 

2. While time did not permit an exhaustive study of the INTCOM 

recommendations, USCIBEC approved the report subject to the emendations set forth below (references are to indicate paragraphs of the 

enclosure with USCIB 9.2/6): 

E03:3(h)(2) 

a. Paragraph A: No change in recommendation. 

b. Paragraph B: No change in recommendation. 

c. Paragraph C: Recommendation should be amended by 

deletion of the phrase 11to USCIBEC11 in · the fourth line thereof. 

d. Paragraph D: Recommendation should be deleted and the 

following substituted therefor: 

PL 86-36/SO use 3605 

e. Paragraph E: No change in recommendation. 

f. Paragraph F: Recommendation should be changed to read 

as follows: 

USCIB: 9.2/7 

"That, in view of the importance of ~stablishing immediately intercept f acilit.ies on Formosa, the Department of State 

pontinue to exert all feasible pressure on 

the Chinese Nationalists to obtain their 

agreement for granting intercept base 

rj.ghts." 

(NOTE: In this connection, see also 

USCIB 29 .13/5.) 

TOP SECRET FROTI-i 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-21-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

24 
USCIB: 9.2/7 

'l'QP SiSRE'i' FiQ'!'H 

25 October 1954 

Subject: COMINT Capability to Provide Early Waming of Chinese 

Communist Attack on Formosa. 

g. Paragraph G: No change in recommendation. EO 3.3(h)(2) 

Pl 86-36/50 USC 3605 

h. Paragraph H: Recommendation with paragraph 3 should 

be changed to read as follows: 

\\\ 

i. Paragraph I: No change in recommendation; however, it 

was agreed that the action of USCIB should 

be a broad statement paralleled by specific 

EO 3,3(h)(2) and detailed proposals from the Director, 

PL 86-36/50USC 3605 NSA, as formulated by him, to the Director, 

I I 

j. Paragraph J: No change in recommendation. 

USCIB: 9.2/7 - 2 -

TOP SECRET FR:OTt I
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                         5
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                    JUN-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                      SEP-24-1999
<CASH>                                                 500
<SECURITIES>                                           438
<RECEIVABLES>                                       35,591
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1,322
<INVENTORY>                                         27,931
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    76,322
<PP&E>                                              66,615
<DEPRECIATION>                                      37,951
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     108,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               41,800
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,292
<OTHER-SE>                                          60,816
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       108,900
<SALES>                                             64,503
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    64,503
<CGS>                                               48,278
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       13,957
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       307
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     621
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,340
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1,321
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     19
<DISCONTINUED>                                          36
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                            55
<EPS-BASIC>                                          .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .00


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.3

Consent of Fred H. Brown

I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of North American Palladium Ltd., which is
being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of references to my name and references to my involvement in the preparation of technical information relating to the
Shebandowan West Property, Ontario, included in the 2009 Annual Information Form of North American Palladium Ltd., dated March 31, 2010 (the "AIF").

I
also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-13766) and in the Registration
Statements on Form F-10 and amendments thereto (File Nos. 333-158082 and 333-164512) of the references to my name and the
above-mentioned information in the AIF.

Dated
this 31st day of March, 2010.



Name:

/s/ FRED H. BROWN Fred H. Brown


---
W’ILL WILSON 

A’I-I’GRNEX- GENERAL 

December 5, 1962 

Mr. W. C. Lindsey Opinion No. WW-1485 

Criminal District Attorney 

Jefferson County Courthouse Re: The validity of deputy 

Beaumont, Texas sheriffs' bonds where 

the acting sheriff is 

Dear Mr. Lindsey: not the obligee. 

You have requested an opinion concernin 

7 

the validity of deputy sheriffs' bonds made 

P 

ayable to (1 the Sheriff 

of Jefferson County, Texas, and (2 C. H. Meyer, Sheriff of 

Jefferson County, Texas, where the said C. H. Meyer has been 

suspended and another duly appointed acting sheriff in his 

stead. 

As a general rule, unless the irregularity or defect 

is such as would render the bond invalid as either a statutory or common law obligation, the surety will not be relieved of his liability. Hines v. Norris, 

App. 1904). 

81 S.W. 791, (civ. 

More specifically, a bond that indicates the 

obligee by reasonable intendment is not invalidated by failure to distinctly name him, Hall v. Hall, 198 S.W. 636, (Civ. 

APP. error ref. 1917). Other cases dearing with this general 

question and consistent with the result here are Kugle v. 

Glen Rose Independent School Dist. No. 1, 50 S.W.2d 375; and 

Watkins v. Minter, 107 Tex. 428, 160 S.W. 227, (1932). 

Therefore, you are advised that the presented manner of setting forth the obligee is not an irregulaity or 

defect of such nature as would render the bonds invalid. 

We would also call to your attention that any such situation may be easily remedied by means of a simple endorsement. 

SUMMARY 

Failure to precisely name the obligee 

in a deputy sheriffs' bond does not render 
Mr. W. C, Llndwy, Page 2 (~~-1485) 

such bond invalid. 

Sincerely, 

WILL WILSON 

Attorney General of Texas 

PP: nss 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE: 

W. V. Geppert, Chairman 

Pat Bailey 

L. P. Lollar 

Thomas H.' Peterson 

REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

BY: Leonard Passmore
. e ~ 

.. s 

Mleli:E! - e.s. EYES OHIH 

SUBJECT NUMBER 

USCIB: 2!)./15 

Subject: 

Item 5 of the Agenda for the 24th Meeting of USCIBEC, 

held 28 January 1955. 

Procedure for Handling Intercept Base Rights ProblEmS 

(USCIB 29./12). 

THE CHAIRMAN suggested that the Committee proceed to consider the 

report submitted by the ad hoc committee. He expressed his opinion that 

the report is an excellent piece of work. 

CAPTAIN AGN:E.W moved that the report be accepted and that the 

Committee be comm.ended for its effort. 

MR. GODEL stated that there are certain minor changes in wording 

agreed between his offic~ and that of the Air Force member. These 

changes were indicated to the Committee and no objections were noted. 

MR. PACKARD invited attention to subparagraph .3b.(.3)(c), in the 

middle of page 4, and asked that it be deleted as unimportant, and 

incorrect. After a brief discussion it was agreed to delete this subparagraph. 

The members agreed that the Executive Secretary would' effect the 

foregoing changes in the basic report, and forward the report to USCIB 

for approval. 

DECISION: (28 January 1955) USCIBEC approved the report contained as 

an enclosure with USCIB 29./12, subject to the amendments noted above, 

and agreed that the Executive Secretary, after incorporating the 

amendments,, would forward the report to USCIB for approval. It was 

agreed, further, to commend the ad hoc committee for their excellent 

effort. 

USCIB: 29./15 - p. -

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-17-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352B 

SECRE'F-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                      19,097,769
<SECURITIES>                                    60,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,339,527
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,378,125
<PP&E>                                      80,204,380
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,238,419
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             104,937,749
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,405,958
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 36,246,075
<COMMON>                                    22,902,905
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,352,618
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               104,937,749
<SALES>                                     34,148,787
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,252,417
<CGS>                                       11,208,117
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,165,158
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,107,984
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             568,653
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                979,275
<INCOME-TAX>                                   122,275
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            857,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   857,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
        

</TABLE>
# CE2004078EN.01092401.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/924 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/924

---

(2004/C 78 E/0977)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0064/04

by Camilo Nogueira Román (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(20 January 2004)

Subject:   Alarming rise in unemployment in Galicia: 7 465 newly unemployed people in December 2003 out of a total of 23 419 for Spain as a whole, bringing the rate of unemployment in Galicia to 12,36 %

Subject:

There was a steep rise in the number of unemployed people in Spain in December 2003, with 23 419 new jobless, the worst rise in the last ten years. Of these 7 465, or 32 % of the total, were in Galicia, although the region accounts for only 7 % of the population. The unemployment rate in Galicia is now 12,36 %. This adverse trend, further evidence of a link between low income and unemployment, calls for special measures to tackle both serious problems simultaneously, particularly in Objective 1 regions such as Galicia.

Is the Commission already aware of this negative trend in employment in Galicia? Is it willing to consider special development measures to combat unemployment, in liaison with the Galician and Spanish authorities?

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(10 February 2004)

(10 February 2004)

The Commission closely monitors developments in the employment situation in all of Spain's autonomous communities.

As regards Galicia, for the 2000-2006 programming period, the regional authorities submitted a regional development plan to the Commission that reflected the region's potential and weaknesses and included some employment-related measures. In response to this plan, the Commission decided to actively contribute to development in Galicia by co-financing its Integrated Operational Programme for 2000-2006. This programme stems from the Community Support Framework defining the development strategy for the Spanish regions covered by Objective 1, including creating and maintaining jobs.

The Structural Funds contributed EUR 3 430 million out of a total budget of EUR 5 087 million. The financial breakdown by Fund was as follows:

| (million euro) |
| --- |
| EC Participation | ERDF | ESF | EAGGF |
| Total: 3 430,058 | 2 335,7 | 392 | 702 358 |
| 100,00 % | 68,10 % | 11,43 % | 20,48 % |

(million euro)

EC Participation

ERDF

ESF

EAGGF

Total: 3 430,058

2 335,7

392

702 358

100,00 %

68,10 %

11,43 %

20,48 %

This operational programme can be modified according to the way in which the region's job market evolves. The mid-term evaluation, laid down in Article 42 of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 (1), has recently been finalised. It will form the basis for any modification of the programme deemed necessary and for possible reprogramming.

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds, OJ L 161, 26.6.1999.

1

---
Exhibit 21

LTC PROPERTIES, INC.    LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES    As of December 31, 2010

Company

State of
Organization

Company

State of
OrganizationAlbuquerque Real Estate Investments, Inc.

Delaware

Merritt Island Real Estate Investments, Inc.

DelawareBakersfield-LTC, Inc.

Delaware

Mission Real Estate Investments, Inc.

DelawareBeaumont Real Estate Investments, LP

Texas

Missouri REI, Inc.

DelawareBV Holding-LTC, Inc.

Delaware

Missouri River Corporation

DelawareCoronado Corporation

Delaware

Monroeville Real Estate Investments, Inc.

DelawareDaytona Beach Real Estate Investments, Inc.

Delaware

MS-FL Real Estate Investments, Inc.

DelawareEast New Mexico, Inc.

Delaware

New Mexico Real Estate Investments, Inc.

DelawareEducation Property Investors, Inc.

Nevada

Newberry Real Estate Investments, Inc.

DelawareFlorida-LTC, Inc.

Nevada

North Carolina Real Estate Investments, LLC

North CarolinaFort Wayne Real Estate Investments, Inc.

Delaware

Park Villa Corporation

DelawareGulf Breeze Real Estate Investments, Inc.

Delaware

PENN-IND Real Estate Investments, Inc.

DelawareKansas-LTC Corporation

Delaware

Skilled Healthcare Holdings, Inc.

DelawareLTC GP I, Inc.

Delaware

South Hills Real Estate Investments, Inc.

DelawareLTC GP VI, Inc.

Delaware

Stephenville Real Estate Investments, Inc.

DelawareLTC Partners IX, L.P.

Delaware

Texas-LTC Limited Partnership

TexasLTC West, Inc.

Nevada

Texas-LTC Woodridge Limited Partnership

DelawareLTC-Bedford, Inc.

Delaware

Tupelo Real Estate Investments, Inc.

DelawareLTC-Dearfield, Inc.

Nevada

TXMS Real Estate Investments, Inc.

DelawareLTC-DS, Inc.

Delaware

Vacaville-LTC, Inc.

DelawareLTC-Finance, Inc.

Delaware

Virginia-LTC, Inc.

NevadaLTC-Gardner, Inc.

DelawareLTC-Griffin, Inc.

NevadaLTC-Jonesboro, Inc.

NevadaLTC-K1 Inc.

DelawareLTC-K2 Limited Partnership

DelawareLTC-K2 LP, Inc.

DelawareLTC-K2, Inc.

DelawareLTC-Lake Forest, Inc.

DelawareLTC-New Mexico, Inc.

NevadaLTC-Ohio, Inc.

DelawareLTC-Richmond, Inc.

NevadaL-Tex GP, Inc.

DelawareL-Tex LP Corporation

Delaware


---



QuickLinks
NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

14675 Lee Road

Chantilly, VA 20151-1715

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release #02-11

Contact: (703) 808-5050 February 1, 2011

NRO Selects 2010 Class of Pioneers

In a January 7, 2011 ceremony, Director of National Reconnaissance Bruce Carlson 

honored Robert Dumais, Jack Gibbs (deceased), and Richard Randazzo (deceased) as 

2010 inductees into the Pioneer Hall. This honor is bestowed on individuals who make 

significant and lasting contributions to the discipline of national reconnaissance.

Commemorative plaques recognizing their achievements are on permanent display at

the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) Headquarters in Chantilly, Virginia.

Mr. Robert H. Dumais pioneered the intelligence utility of a new capability for an 

imaging satellite system. This led to the subsequent design of a new subsystem on an 

existing imaging satellite that greatly improved the quality of imagery products from 

space. His career in national reconnaissance spanned from the 1960’s until 1996.

Brigadier General Jack A. Gibbs, USAF (Ret), helped pioneer the application of 

innovative engineering techniques to U-2 operations. His contributions resulted in the 

effective use of high-altitude airborne reconnaissance for intelligence collection over 

denied areas during the Cold War. As a USAF Colonel assigned to CIA’s U-2 program 

from March 1956 to July 1958, he served as the Senior Military Advisor overseeing U-2 

operations, pilot training, research, and development upgrades while reporting to fomer 

DNRO Richard Bissell. He supervised efforts to reduce the radar cross section of the 

U-2 and to assess the feasibility of developing a follow-on aircraft with low radar 

“detectability.” Through Jack Gibbs’ tireless efforts, the U-2 became a highly successful 

and proven airborne reconnaissance platform for use over denied territory. His career in 

national reconnaissance spanned from 1942 until 1966.

Colonel Richard J. “Randy” Randazzo, USAF (Ret), pioneered the introduction and 

application of new operational techniques for NRO imaging systems. His countless 

engineering studies and demonstrations, followed by implementation of his designs, 

resulted in improved satisfaction of mission requirements and increased coverage of 

high-priority targets. Col Randazzo made a profound contribution to the acquisition and 

operation of all NRO imaging systems from 1964 to 1986.

The 2010 inductees join 77 other pioneers in the Hall, each honored for their critical 

work that established the NRO’s reputation for engineering excellence, responsiveness, 

and technical innovation over the last 50 years. Building upon their foundation, today’s 

NRO strives to provide a global perspective when users need the information.

Designation as a Pioneer of National Reconnaissance is the highest honor in the field. 

-NRO-
#### Zautcke, Respondent, vs. North Milwaukee Townsite Company No. 3, Appellant.

*December 17, 1896*

January *12, 1897.*

*Negotiable instruments: When interest becomes due: Demand: Default.*

The fact that a note .bearing interest payable semiannually was dated, executed, and delivered on a certain day fixes the date for the payment of instalments of interest at the end of every six months thereafter, and no demand was necessary tp create a default.

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: D. H. JohNsoN, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage upon real estate. The complaint alleges that the mortgage was given to secure payment of a promissory note executed, delivered, and bear*22ing date on the 26th of June, 1893, whereby the defendant promised to pay to the plaintiff’s order the sum of $53,000 on or before five years from date thereof, with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent, per annum, *pan/able serrU-cmnudWy.*The complaint further alleges default in the payment of the semiannual instalment of interest which fell due June '26, 1895; also that the plaintiff thereafter duly exercised an option contained in the mortgage by which he was empowered to declare the entire sum due. The complaint also contains the other usual and appropriate allegations in foreclosure actions, which, however, are not necessary to be stated. A general demurrer to the complaint was overruled, and the defendant appealed.

For the appellant there was a brief by *TimUn dk Qlioks-man,*and oral argument by *W. H. Timlin.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Wells, Brigham dk Upham,*and oral argument by *W. E. Blade.*

WiNslow, J.

The defect supposed to exist in this complaint is that the semiannual instalments of interest do not, by the terms of the note, become due on a day certain, and that a demand was necessary before a default took place. The point is manifestly not well taken. The note was *dated,*executed, and delivered on the 26th of June, and by its terms interest is payable semiannually. This fixes the date of payment at the end of every six months thereafter. An instalment of interest therefore was due June 26, 1895, and no demand was necessary to create a default.

*By the*Gourt.— Order affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 30, 2013

p0923

Order 

Clerk

September 30, 2013

147217

MAGDICH & ASSOCIATES PC,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147217

COA: 314518

Oakland CC: 2012-125729-CK

NOVI DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES LLC,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 19, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the order of the Court of Appeals, and we 

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for plenary consideration.