alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      30,315,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,950,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    90,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,071,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,720,000
<PP&E>                                      17,403,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,930,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,888,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,685,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       111,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  41,966,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                47,888,000
<SALES>                                     13,971,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,971,000
<CGS>                                       10,146,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,146,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,698,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             263,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,482,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,482,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,482,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1234 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1234

  To enhance consumer rights relating to consumer report disputes by 
      requiring provision of documentation provided by consumers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 6, 2015

  Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mr. Daines) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, 
                       Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To enhance consumer rights relating to consumer report disputes by 
      requiring provision of documentation provided by consumers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FIX Credit Reporting Errors Act'' or 
the ``FIX Act''.

SEC. 2. PROVISION OF DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED BY CONSUMERS.

    Section 611 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681i) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2)--
                            (i) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``, 
                        including documentation provided by the 
                        consumer,'' after ``relevant information''; and
                            (ii) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ``, 
                        including documentation provided by the 
                        consumer,'' after ``relevant information''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (4), by inserting ``, including 
                documentation,'' after ``relevant information''; and
            (2) in subsection (f)(2)(B)(ii), by inserting ``, including 
        documentation,'' after ``relevant information''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                       Exhibit 5


              Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
                             One Financial Center
                          Boston, Massachusetts 02111

701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.                           Telephone: 617/542-6000
Washington, D.C. 20004                                  Fax: 617/542-2241
Telephone: 202/434-7300                                 www.Mintz.com
Fax: 202/434-7400


                                        October 21, 1999

CuraGen Corporation
555 Long Wharf Drive, 11th Floor
New Haven, Connecticut 06511

Ladies and Gentlemen:

  We have acted as counsel to CuraGen Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), in connection with the preparation and filing with the Securities
and Exchange Commission of a Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the
"Registration Statement"), pursuant to which the Company is registering the
issuance under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of a total of 2,000,000
shares (the "Shares") of its common stock, $.01 par value per share (the "Common
Stock").  This opinion is being rendered in connection with the filing of the
Registration Statement.  All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise
defined shall have the respective meanings given to them in the Registration
Statement.

  In connection with this opinion, we have examined the Company's Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws, both as
currently in effect; such other records of the corporate proceedings of the
Company and certificates of the Company's officers as we have deemed relevant;
and the Registration Statement and the exhibits thereto.

  In our examination, we have assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the
legal capacity of natural persons, the authenticity of all documents submitted
to us as originals, the conformity to original documents of all documents
submitted to us as certified or photostatic copies and the authenticity of the
originals of such copies.

  Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that (i) the Shares have been
duly and validly authorized by the Company and (ii) the Shares, when sold, will
have been duly and validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable shares of the
Common Stock, free of preemptive rights.

  Our opinion is limited to the General Corporation Laws of the State of
Delaware, and we express no opinion with respect to the laws of any other
jurisdiction.  No opinion is expressed herein with respect to the qualification
of the Shares under the securities or blue sky laws of any state or any foreign
jurisdiction.

  We understand that you wish to file this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement, and we hereby consent thereto.


                                          Very truly yours,


                                          /s/ Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris,
                                              Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

                                              Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris,
                                              Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Exhibit 23.7

Consent of Robert Duinker

I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of North American Palladium Ltd., which is being filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission, of references to my name and references to my involvement in the preparation of NI 43-101 Technical Report for Lac des Iles Mine, Ontario Incorporating a Preliminary Economic Assessment of Mine Expansion
Plan (effective date of February 18, 2015) included in the 2014 Annual Information Form of North American Palladium Ltd., dated March 31, 2015 (the AIF).

I also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-13766) and Registration
Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-200762) of the references to my name and the above-mentioned information in the AIF.

Dated this
31st day of March, 2015.



|     |  |                       
|---- |  | ----------------------
|Per: |  | /s/ Robert Duinker    
|     |  | Robert Duinker, P.Eng.
|     |  | Senior Consultant     
|     |  | Hatch Ltd.
----

(2004/C 65 E/289)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3504/03

by Hiltrud Breyer (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(24 November 2003)

Subject:   Information on the level of EU funding granted to Rhineland-Palatinate between January 1997 and December 2002

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(2 December 2003)

The Commission is collecting the information it needs to answer the question. It will communicate its findings as soon as possible.

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


The Board of Directors
netGuru, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-111017, 333-29747, 333-72095 and 333-84184) on Form S-8 and in the
registration statements (Nos. 333-124920, 333-112181, 333-109517, 333-100651,
333-40564, and 333-84940) on Form S-3 of netGuru, Inc. of our report dated June
16, 2004, except as to notes 9 and 10, which are as of March 11, 2005, relating
to the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
comprehensive loss, and cash flows of netGuru, Inc. and subsidiaries for the
year ended March 31, 2004, which report appears in the March 31, 2005 annual
report on Form 10-KSB of netGuru, Inc.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Costa Mesa, California
July 12, 2005
(

• SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN

AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

STAFF REPORT

RULE464

ORGANIC CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS

Prepared by: Au Mohamad

Air Pollution Control Engineer

Approved by: Aleta Kennard

Supervisor of Technical Services

27
Rule 464, Organic Chemical Manufacturing Operations

Comments and Responses

July 23, 1998, Page 22

C

RESPONSE #4

COMMENT #5

RESPONSE #5

COMMENT #6

RESPONSE #6

Section 308 has been deleted from Rule 464.

Section 413.2: Referenced Section 413.4 is missing.

There is no Section 413.4. Section 413.2 is revised with the correct

section number.

The District should demonstrate that there are no affected sources of any

provisions of the SOCMI or pharmaceutical CTGs that are not included

in Rule 464.

Aerojet, Georgia Pacific, and Procter and Gamble are three sources

affected by Rule 464. Aerojet manufactures pharmaceutical chemicals

which is subject to pharmaceutical CTG. Rule 464 contains standards

which equal or exceed the control requirements in the Pharmaceutical

manufacturing CTG. Georgia Pacific manufactures resins which is

subject to the resin manufacturing CTG; however, since Georgia Pacific

is not a major source, Rule 464 is not required to include control

requirements from the resin manufacturing CTG. Georgia Pacific met

BACT by using an incinerator to control its VOC emissions. The

permitted control efficiency for the incinerator is 95% by weight. Procter

and Gamble manufactures listed SOCMI chemicals and is, therefore,

subject to the SOCMI continuous reactor and distillation CTG.

The SOCMI CTG applies to vent streams originating from continuous

reactor and distillation operations. For an applicable vent stream, the

CTG uses the Total Resource Effectiveness (TRE) index to determine

control requirement. If the calculated TRE index is less than or equal 1 .0,

the control requirement is VOC reduction by 98 weight-percent or to 20

ppmv of VOC on dry basis, corrected to 3 percent oxygen. Although any

control technique can be used, the control requirement in the SOCMI

CTG specifies thermal incineration or flaring in most cases. No controls

are required for TRE> 1.

The District evaluated the applicability of the SOCMI CTG to Procter and

Gamble Sacramento plant with information provided by the source.

Furthermore, the plant has made process improvements which reduce

emissions fromthe emission rates used in the TRE calculation.

L Since all affected vent streams have TRE index values greater than 1.0, the implementation of SOCMI CTG provisions will not require controls,

therefore, will not result in any emission reduction’ at the Procter and

65
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.2


(AHN KWAN & CO. LETTERHEAD)



                                                                      DELOITTE
                                                                      TOUCHE
                                                                      TOHMATSU




                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form
F-3 (File Nos. 333-7284, 333-91034 and 333-99073) of SK Telecom Co., Ltd. of our
report dated March 28, 2003 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the translation of Korean won
amounts into US dollar amounts, the differences between generally accepted
accounting standards in Korea and the United States, and the early adoption of
Statement of Korea Accounting Standards No. 6, "Event Occurring after Balance
Sheet Date".) appearing in this annual report on Form 20-F of SK Telecom Co.,
Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2002.


/s/ Ahn Kwon & Co


Ahn Kwon & Co., a member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Seoul, Korea

June 2, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                  CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of netGuru, Inc.
(the "Company") for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: July 15, 2003                           By:      /s/ Amrit K. Das
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Amrit K. Das
                                                        Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

         In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of netGuru, Inc.
(the "Company") for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: July 15, 2003                           By:       /s/ Bruce K. Nelson
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Bruce K. Nelson
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 22

- 30458

State of Louisiana; Louisiana State Racing Commission; Louisiana Horsemen ’ s Benevolent & Protective Association 1993 Incorporated; Louisiana Thoroughbred Breeders Association; Jockeys Guild Incorporated; State of West Virginia; West Virginia Racing Commission; Bernard K. Chatters; Edward J. Fenasci; Larry Findley, Sr.; Warren Harang, III; Gera rd Melancon

Plaintiffs

— Appell ees ,

versus
Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority, Incorporated; Lisa Lazarus; Steve Beshear; Adolpho Birch; Leonard S. Coleman, Jr.; Joseph De Francis; Ellen McClain; Susan Stover; Bill Thomason; D.G. Van Clief; Federal Trade Commission; Lina M. Kham; A l varo Bedoya; Rebecca Kelly Slaughter; Christine S. Wilson

Defendants

— Appell ants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:22

- CV

- 1934 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 18, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-30458 Document: 00516550451 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/18/2022No. 2 2

- 30458

2 Before King, Duncan, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : * The states of Louisiana and West Virginia, joined by various horseracing organizations and other individuals ( collectively , “ p laintiffs”) , sued under the Administrative Procedure Act to enjo in rules approved by the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) pursuant to the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act (“HISA”)

. 1 Agreeing with the p laintiffs, the district court enjoined the rules and the d efendants timely appealed

. O n August 3, 2022,

o ur court granted a partial stay pending resolution of the appeal

. 2 In a separate case decided today, our court has ruled that HISA is facially unconstitutional under the private non

- delegation doctrine. See National Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association v. Black [ National Horsemen’s ] , No. 22

- 10387, slip op. a t 3

– 4 (5th Cir. Nov. 1 8 , 2022)

. Accordingly, we REMAND this case to the district court for further proceedings in light of National Horsemen’s . The partial stay is LIFTED

.

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

1 Pub. L. No. 116

– 260, §§ 1201

– 12, 134 Stat. 1182, 3252

– 75 (2020) (codified at 15 U. S.C. § § 3051

– 60).

2 The stay suspended the injunction to the extent the district court found the rules generally violated the APA’s notice

- and

- comment requirements. The stay left the injunction in place , however, as to three specific rules that the distric t court found exceeded the FTC’s authority under HISA

. Case: 22-30458 Document: 00516550451 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/18/2022
exv10w29







EXHIBIT
10.29




Annual Cash Compensation of Named Executive Officers



The executive officers named in the compensation table in Monsanto’s proxy statement dated Dec. 5, 2007 (the
“Named
Executive Officers”) have their base salaries determined yearly by the People and Compensation Committee (the
“Committee”) of the Board of Directors. It is anticipated that such determinations will occur annually, effective
during
a pay period in the following January. The Named Executive Officers are all “at will” employees, and do not have
written or oral employment agreements other than change of control agreements, the form of which is filed, as
required,
as an exhibit to reports filed by the Company under the Exchange Act. The Company, upon the approval of the
Committee, retains the right to unilaterally decrease or increase the Named Executive Officers’ base salaries at
any
time.



The Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in the Company’s annual incentive compensation plans for
all
regular employees, including executive officers, which provide for cash awards. Summaries of such annual incentive
compensation plans are filed as exhibits, as required, to reports filed by the Company under the Exchange Act.



On Oct. 20, 2008, the Committee approved for the Company’s Named Executive Officers the following base salaries to
become effective as of Jan. 12, 2009, and the following annual incentive awards for the 2008 fiscal year, which
will be
paid on Nov. 7, 2008:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Base Salary	 	 	Base Salary	 	 	FY 2008 Annual	 
	Named Executive Officer	 	(as of 12/31/07)	 	 	(as of 1/12/09)	 	 	Incentive Award	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Hugh Grant

Chairman of the Board, President

and Chief Executive Officer
	 	$	1,355,000	 	 	$	1,403,780	 	 	$	3,326,796	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Brett D. Begemann

Executive V.P., Global Commercial
	 	$	515,000	 	 	$	540,000	 	 	$	750,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Carl M. Casale

Executive V.P., Strategy and Operations
	 	$	530,000	 	 	$	550,000	 	 	$	780,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Terrell K. Crews

Executive V.P.,

Chief Financial Officer and

Vegetable Business CEO
	 	$	565,000	 	 	$	590,000	 	 	$	800,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Robert T. Fraley, Ph.D.

Executive V.P. and Chief

Technology Officer
	 	$	575,000	 	 	$	600,000	 	 	$	840,000	 





The Company intends to provide additional information regarding other compensation awarded to the Named Executive
Officers in respect of and during the 2008 fiscal year in the proxy statement for its 2009 annual meeting of
shareowners,
which proxy statement is expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in December 2008.
Exhibit
32.2





WRITTEN
STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





The
undersigned, Roy Swan, is the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Carver Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”).





This
statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008 (the
“Report”).





By
execution of this statement, I certify that:





a)
            the Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));
and





b)
            the information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
      periods covered by the
Report.





July 1,
      2008
            /s/
      Roy  SwanDated
            Roy
      Swan





This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.