alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SEGRB±' 

~:A577~4 

• 

INr # 004 

24 May 1955 

MEIDRANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, USCIB 

Subject: Progress Report for Period 1 January 1955 to 1 June 1955 

Reference: users 5/460 dated 30 July 1953 

1. All matters referred to the Intelligence Committee by the 

reference have been completed. Recommendations with respect to 

the last of these items, Alerting the Highest Authorities, were 

forwarded via INT # 0003 dated 22 April 1955. 

2. Two items referred to the Intelligence Committee have not 

been completed: 

a. The Counter Clandestine COMINT Planning problem was 

placed on the agenda and discussed during five recent meetings 

(18 January, 24 February, 29 M:l.rch, 21 April and 24 May 1955). 

USCIB 9.6/J of 18 April 1955, as amended during the 28th Meeting 

of USCIBEC plus INI'COM 9.6/6 and 9.6/8 indicate progress to date 

and proposed. action. 

b. Certain proposed changes in Appendix B submitted by 

the Director, NSA (USCIB 14.1/.3), plus comments thereon by the 

Executive Secretary, USCIB, were considered by INTCOM in February 

1954. The Committee agreed to reconsider this item after the 

OJMINT community had observed the effects of categorization. 

The subject was accordingly placed on the INTCOM agenda for its 

28th Meeting. 

_/f' e_, 

H. C. SIMMJNS 

Lt. Colonel, US.AF 

Chairman, INTCOM 

SECRET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
... s~WEfD..:.AS - - -- - 7 7 . ~ 

SEC # 004 

2.3 May 1955 

:MIDr.oRANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY1 USCIB 

Subjeot: Progress Report for Period 1 January 1955 to 1 June 1955 

Reference: USCIB 5/460 dated JO July 1953 

1. All but one of the projects referred to the Security 

Connnittee by the reference (item 2a, below) have been completed. 

The last item completed was the consolidation of CIBD #7 and 

CIBD #14 which was discussed by the Connnittee in regular and 

special sessions during the period November 1954 - April 1955. 

are: 

2. Items now awaiting action by the Security Connnittee 

a. Distribution of COMINT Documents in the Washington 

~ 

Status: Research is being continued on this item. 

It is anticipated that this item will be discussed 

by the Committee in July. 

b. Limitations on Travel in Foreign Countries by Persons 

Having Knowledge of COMINT 

Status: Detailed provisions of this draft directive 

are presently being coordinated within the Department 

of State. 

c. Classification and Use of COMINT Codewords 

Status: This item is scheduled for discussion by 

the Committee during June. 

3. Annex A to OIBD lf7 dated 12 May 1955 (Current Examples of 

Specific .Areas Involving Unacceptable or Undue Risk) will be con-. 

sidered by the Gonnnittee at least once each month until the world 

situation becomes more stableo 

tJ~lR.~ 

WILLIAM R. CULMER 

Major, .Arty., USA 

SECRETChairman, SECCOM
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 12, 2017.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-17-00090-CR

DANNY QUOC NGUYEN, Appellant 

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 228th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 1468348 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

In a single issue, appellant contends that his conviction for murder is void. He 

contends that the trial court that rendered judgment—the 228th District Court of 

Harris County—lacked jurisdiction because the grand jury that indicted appellant 

was impaneled by a different district court—the 179th District Court of Harris 

County. 
2

Both courts were Harris County district courts, and the indictment bears the 

file stamp of the Harris County District Clerk. Under these circumstances, the trial 

court had jurisdiction. See Saldivar v. State, No. 14-16-00888-CR, 2017 WL 

4697888, at *1–2 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 19, 2017, no pet. h.); 

Matthews v. State, No. 14-16-00913-CR, 2017 WL 3271195, at *2 (Tex. App.—

Houston [14th Dist.] Aug. 1, 2017, pet. ref’d); see also Aguillon v. State, No. 14-17-

00002-CR, 2017 WL 3045797 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] July 18, 2017, pet. 

ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication). 

Appellant’s issue is overruled for the reasons stated in Saldivar and Matthews. 

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. 

 PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown, and Wise.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40820

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EDGAR ELEAZAR LOZANO-LUCERO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:15-CR-67-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Edgar Eleazar 

Lozano-Lucero has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lozano-Lucero has not filed a response. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 17, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40820 Document: 00513383939 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
No. 15-40820

2

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-40820 Document: 00513383939 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
#### State ex rel. Rowe, Respondent, vs. Florin, Town Clerk, and another, Appellants.

*January 30*

March *31, 1908.*

Appeal from a Judgment of the circuit court for Eau Claire countyr E. W. Helms, Judge,

*Reversed.*

*Horace B. Walmsley,*for the appellants.

For the respondent there was a brief by *Wickham, & Farr,*and oral argument by *James Wickham.*

I-Ceewin, J.

This case is ruled by *State ex rel. Rowe v. Krumenauer, ante,*p. 185, 115 N. W. 798. Therefore the judgment below must be reversed.

*By the Court.*— The judgment is reversed, and the court below directed to dismiss the action.
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Jeffrey S. Mathiesen, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Delphax Technologies Inc.,certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Delphax Technologies Inc.
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;
4.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.           Dated: May 2, 2005   By:   /s/ Jeffrey S. Mathiesen                  Jeffrey S. Mathiesen
Exhibit (32)(1)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of C-COR Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 24, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Woodle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
that, to my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ DAVID A. WOODLE                                     
|David A. Woodle Chief Executive Officer February 2, 2005
exv10w57






Exhibit 10.57




AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO THE

PATRIOT RISK MANAGEMENT, INC. 2005 STOCK OPTION PLAN




     RESOLVED, that Section 4.01 [1] of the 2005 Stock Option Plan is hereby amended to read as
follows:



     “4.01 Number of Shares.




[1] Subject to Section 4.03, the number of shares of stock subject to awards
under the Plan is 62,500.”; and further



     RESOLVED, that Section 9.08 of the 2005 Stock Option Plan is hereby amended by adding the
following sentence to the end thereof:




“Upon approval by the Company’s stockholders of the Company’s 2008 Stock Incentive Plan, no
further awards shall be made under this Plan.”
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Tex as
March 18, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00030

- CR
Jorge Rene VELASCO , Appellant

v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 406th Judicial District Court , Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016

- CRN

- 000108

- D4 Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr. , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R The reporter’s record was due on March 7, 2022. On January 27, 2022, court reporter Yvonne S. Nino filed twelve volumes of the record; however, the docketing statement filed in this appeal indicates David Laurel is the court reporter responsible for this case. Accordingly, it is unclear whether the reporter’s record is complete. We therefore order appellant to file a response by March 28, 2022 confirming whether the reporter’s record is complete.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
co urt on this 18th day of March, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ , Clerk of Court
|       (3)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|       (4)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  May      20, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Nicholas J.      Malino                             |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                               |   | Nicholas      J. Malino                                 |   |
|                               |   | Chief      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer |   |
|                               |   |                                                         |   |
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

I, Deborah C. Wright, President and Chief Executive Officer of Carver Bancorp,
Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Carver Bancorp, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation
of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  June 27, 2004                       /s/ Deborah C. Wright
                                           ---------------------
                                           Deborah C. Wright
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 21.0**

 

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**

 

The Cheesecake FactoryRestaurants, Inc., a California corporation

 

The Cheesecake Factory BakeryIncorporated, a California corporation

 

C.F.I. Promotions Co. LLC, aColorado limited liability company

 

The Houston Cheesecake FactoryCorporation, a Texas corporation

 

Cheesecake Factory Restaurantsof Kansas LLC, a Kansas limited liability company

 

Grand Lux Cafe LLC, aNevada limited liability company

 

GLC Galleria Club, Inc., a Texascorporation

 

Hawaii Cheesecake Factory Restaurants Inc., aHawaii corporation

 

Rock Sugar Incorporated, a Californiacorporation

 

The Cheesecake Factory of Howard County LLC,a Maryland limited liability company

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 24, 2018

a0117 

# Order

Clerk January 24, 2018

156494

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 156494

COA: 338006

Kalamazoo CC: 2016

- 000774

- FC

CHARLES EDWARD PICKETT, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 28, 2017 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and i t is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
netGuru, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
333-29747, 333-72095 and 333-84184) on Form S-8 and in the Registration
Statements (Nos. 333-100651, 333-40564, 333-94921, 333-88887 and 333-84940) on
Form S-3 of netGuru, Inc. of our report dated June 9, 2003, except as to the
second paragraph of Note 4 and Note 12, which are as of July 10, 2003, relating
to the consolidated balance sheet of netGuru, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March
31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity and comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in the
two-year period ended March 31, 2003, which report appears in the March 31, 2003
annual report on Form 10-KSB of netGuru, Inc.

Our report dated June 9, 2003, except as to the second paragraph of Note 4 and
Note 12, which are as of July 10, 2003, contains an explanatory paragraph
indicating that effective April 1, 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets."

                                                              /s/ KPMG LLP
Costa Mesa, California
July 15, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on the agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within twelve days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    . A copy of the agreement is available through the Commission's Web site (                    *www.fmc.gov*) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:*                     012288-001.                

*Title:*                     Hoegh/NYK Atlantic/Pacific Space Charter Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     Hoegh Autoliners AS and Nippon Yusen Kaisha.                

*Filing Party:*                     Joshua Stein, Esq.; Cozen O'Connor; 1627 I Street NW., Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006.                

*Synopsis:*                     The amendment adds the trade between the U.S. West Coast, on the one hand, and China, South Korea, and Japan, on the other hand, to the geographic scope of the agreement, revises the duration of the agreement, changes the name of the agreement to reflect the new geographic scope, and restates the agreement.                

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Dated: February 20, 2015.

Karen V. Gregory,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-03893 Filed 2-24-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
# No Fear Act

On May 15, 2002, President Bush signed the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (No FEAR Act) into law. The No FEAR Act, with an effective date of October 1, 2003, requires Federal agencies to be accountable for violations of antidiscrimination and whistleblower protection laws.

Section 301 of the No FEAR Act requires each agency to post quarterly on its public Web site certain summary statistical data relating to equal employment opportunity complaints filed against them under 29 C.F.R. Part 1614.

The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued rules regarding posting of Equal Employment Opportunity complaint processing data. Those rules include posting summary statistics for the current fiscal year on a cumulative (year-to-date) quarterly basis and statistics for each of the preceding five years.

The pages linked below contain the information required by the No FEAR Act and EEOC rules.

**Other relative information:**

Notification and Federal Employee Anti-discrimination Retaliation Act of 2002

MD-715 - Part J Special Program Plan for the Recruitment, Hiring, Advancement, and Retention of Persons with Disabilities 

2024 No Fear Act Statistics
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2008-0256 Directorate ID: 2007-SW-01-AD

Helicopter Model: Agusta S.p.A. (Type Certificate Currently Held by AgustaWestland S.p.A.) 

Model AB139 and AW139 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 33 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to detect a fatigue crack that could result in failure 

of the fuselage frame and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter

Labor per Helicopter

(1 work-hour x $85/workhour per inspection)$85

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $85 per inspection

$10,000 repair the fuselage middle frame 

section

Total US Fleet Cost $2,805 per inspection

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Sharon Miles