alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00461-CR

William Christopher Lloyd, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 68452, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Appellant

William Christopher Lloyd pleaded guilty to the offense of possession of a controlled substance,

methamphetamine, in an amount of one gram or more but less than four grams. Punishment was

assessed at seven years’ imprisonment.

Lloyd’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a

brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of

Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there

are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See 386 U.S. at 744-45; see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d

684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous

v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Lloyd was mailed a copy of counsel’s brief and
advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has

been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s

motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Field

Affirmed

Filed: February 5, 2014

Do Not Publish

2
EXHIBIT 21.2

                    UNRESTRICTED SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

Intercabo Atlantico - Communicacoes por Cabo S.A.
Intercabo Capital - Communicacoes por Cabo S.A.
Intercabo Centro - Televisao por Cabo S.A.
Intercabo Norte - Communicacoes por Cabo S.A.
Intercabo Sul - Communicacoes por Cabo S.A.
Intercabo Televisao por Cabo S.A.
UCI Enterprises, Inc.
UIH AML, Inc.
UIH Brazil SP, Inc.
UIH Communication, Inc.
UIH Spain, Inc.
UIH Turkey, Inc.
UIM Aircraft, Inc.
UPC Kft.
Bragatel-Companhia de Televisao por Cabo de Braga S.A.
Burgos Sistemas di Cable S.A.
Interway Holding BV
Israel Cable Programming Company Ltd.
Kiwi Cable Company Ltd.
Exhibit 23.3



LOGO

Consent of Denis Decharte

I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of North American Palladium Ltd., which is being filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission, of references to my name and references to my involvement in the preparation of NI 43-101 Technical Report for Lac des Iles Mine, Ontario Incorporating a Preliminary Economic Assessment of Mine Expansion
Plan (effective date of February 18, 2015) included in the 2014 Annual Information Form of North American Palladium Ltd., dated March 31, 2015 (the AIF).

I also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-13766) and Registration
Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-200762) of the references to my name and the above-mentioned information in the AIF.

Dated this
31st day of March, 2015.



|     |  |                        
|---- |  | -----------------------
|Per: |  | /s/ Denis Decharte     
|     |  | Denis Decharte, P.Eng. 
|     |  | Resource Modeller      
|     |  | Lac des Iles Mines Ltd.
EXHIBIT
32.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Co-Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Optimal Group Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify
that to the best of the undersigneds knowledge: 1)
the Companys Annual
 Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report),
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
the information
 contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
 financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated:
March 13, 2008

/s/ Neil S. WechslerNeil S. WechslerCo-Chairman andChief Executive Officer
#### The State ex rel. Carpenter, Appellant, vs. Mathys, Respondent.

*May 16*

June *19, 1902.*

*Appealable order: Examination of party.*

An order denying a motion to limit the scope of the examination of a party under sec. 4096, Stats. 1898, is not appealable, even though it imposes costs of motion.

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Pierce county: E. *W.*Helms, Circuit Judge.

*Appeal dismissed.*

The relator obtained a writ of *certiorari*from the circuit court for Pierce county by which he sought to review the action of the board of review of the village of Maiden Rock. Before making return to the writ, the respondent obtained an order for the examination of the relator, under sec. 4096, Stats. 1898. Thereupon the relator made a motion before the circuit court “to limit the subjects of the examination of the relator herein.” This motion was denied, with $10 costs of motion. The relator appeals from such order.

The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *Walter C. Owen.*

Eor the .respondent there was a brief by *Baker &*Haven, and oral argument by *Spencer Haven.*

*32Baudeeh, J.

Subd. 3, sec. 3069, State. 1898, provides that an appeal may be taken “when an order grants, refuses, continues or modifies a provisional remedy.” The order appealed from herein denies the relator’s motion to limit the subjects as to which he is sought to1 be examined under sec. 4096. It neither’ “grants, refuses, continues or modifies a provisional remedy,” as mentioned in the section first cited, and is therefore not appealable. The fact that the court required the relator to pay costs of motion does not bring the case within the provisions of the statute as it now exists.

*By the Court.*— The appeal is dismissed.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1518 

To make exclusive the authority of the Federal Government to regulate 

the labeling of products made in the United States and introduced 

in interstate or foreign commerce, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2015 

Mr. LEE (for himself, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. KING, and Ms. COLLINS) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To make exclusive the authority of the Federal Government 

to regulate the labeling of products made in the United 

States and introduced in interstate or foreign commerce, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reinforcing American5 Made Products Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1518 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSIVITY OF FEDERAL AUTHORITY TO REGU2 LATE LABELING OF PRODUCTS MADE IN THE 

3 UNITED STATES AND INTRODUCED IN INTER4 STATE OR FOREIGN COMMERCE. 

5 Section 320933 of the Violent Crime Control and 

6 Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (15 U.S.C. 45a) is amend7 ed— 

8 (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘To the ex9 tent’’ and inserting the following: 

10 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—To the extent’’; 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(b) EFFECT ON STATE LAW.—The provisions of 

13 this section shall supersede any provisions of the law of 

14 any State relating to the extent to which a product is in15 troduced, delivered for introduction, sold, advertised, or 

16 offered for sale in interstate or foreign commerce with a 

17 ‘Made in the U.S.A.’ or ‘Made in America’ label, or the 

18 equivalent thereof, in order to represent that such product 

19 was in whole or substantial part of domestic origin.’’; and 

20 (3) in the third sentence of subsection (a), as 

21 designated by paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Nothing 

22 in this section’’ and inserting ‘‘Except as provided in 

23 subsection (b), nothing in this section’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# CE2004078EN.01085402.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/854 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/854

---

(2004/C 78 E/0907)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3750/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject:   Update on use of funding from the LIFE III programme by the municipality of Florence

Subject:

In its answer to question E-1049/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Florence had submitted projects and secured funding under the LIFE III programme, the Commission stated that a number of proposals had been submitted but they had not been funded.

1

Can the Commission say why the projects submitted were not considered suitable?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(20 January 2004)

(20 January 2004)

The Commission informs the Honourable Member that the two proposals submitted by the municipality of Firenze under the LIFE III Programme for 2002 were not co-financed.

Proposal LIFE02 ENV/IT/000074 failed criterion 3 ‘Coherence and quality’. The beneficiary was informed in the Commission's letter of 2 September 2002.

Although proposal LIFE02 ENV/IT/000087 passed the selection criteria, its score was insufficiently high, relative to other proposals to qualify for co-financing. The beneficiary was informed in our letter of 2 September 2002.

The municipality of Firenze did not submit any proposals in 2000 or 2003.

---

(1)  OJ C 280 E, 21.11.2003, p. 104.

1

---
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.55

                           ALLONGE TO PROMISSORY NOTE

Amount:  $300,000                                       Detroit, Michigan

Dated:  March 27, 1997

     UNDER date of October 18, 1996, the undersigned ("Borrower") made and
delivered to the Jay F. Joliat Qualified Terminable Interest Marital Trust,
u/a/d 4-8-82  ("Lender") a Secured Promissory Note in the principal amount of
$300,000 (the "Note").

     At this time, Borrower has requested that Lender adjust the rate at which
interest accrues on the unpaid principal balance under the Note.

     Accordingly, Lender and Borrower hereby agree to amend the Note in the
following particular:

     1. Rate at which interest accrues on the unpaid principal balance under
the Note is hereby modified from 14% to 10% per annum.

     2. The Lender is the Jay F. Joliat Qualified Terminable Interest Marital
Trust, u/a/d 4-8- 82.

     3. This Allonge is but an amendment to the Note by way of modification and
does not constitute payment, satisfaction or discharge of the Note or any
obligation thereunder.  The Note, the Loan Commitment Letter and the Security
Agreement and all documents delivered by Borrower to secure its obligations
under the Note and any and all other documents executed by Borrower in
connection with the delivery of the Note are hereby ratified and confirmed as
being in full force and effect, as modified hereby.  In addition, Borrower
represents and warrants that it has no defense to payment or claims of  offset
under the Note.

THIS ALLONGE HAS BEEN EXECUTED AND DELIVERED ON MARCH 27, 1997.

BORROWER:

Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd.,
a Michigan corporation

By: /s/ William R. Hurd
   --------------------------------
William R. Hurd
Its:  President and Chief Operating Officer

ACCEPTANCE:
-----------

     THE UNDERSIGNED hereby accepts the foregoing Allonge Promissory Note in
accordance with its terms.



JAY F. JOLIAT QUALIFIED TERMINABLE
INTEREST MARITAL TRUST, U/A/D 4-8-82

/s/ Jay F. Joliat
--------------------------------------
Jay F. Joliat, Individually and as Trustee
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       7,390,972
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,390,972
<PP&E>                                          18,270
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,409,242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          174,038
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,235,204
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,409,242
<SALES>                                        126,439
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               756,959
<CGS>                                           30,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                50,561
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                675,898
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            675,898
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   675,898
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    20.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    20.42
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.7

                             AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE
                          OPTICAL SENSORS INCORPORATED
                          EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PAY PLAN

This Amendment No. 2 to the Optical Sensors Incorporated Executive Severance Pay
Plan is made effective as of April 19, 2001.

                                    RECITALS

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Optical Sensors Incorporated (the "Company")
approved an amendment to the Optical Sensors Incorporated Executive Severance
Pay Plan (the "Severance Pay Plan") by unanimous written consent effective April
19, 2001; and

WHEREAS, this Amendment is entered into to give effect to such action of the
Board of Directors of the Company;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Severance Pay Plan is hereby amended as follows effective as
April 19, 2001:

         1. Section 2.6(a)(iii) of the Severance Pay Plan is hereby amended in
its entirety to read as follows:

         (iii)    any Person, other than Hayden R. Fleming or Circle F Ventures,
                  LLC, a Georgia limited liability company, or any of his or its
                  Affiliates, is or becomes the "beneficial owner" (as defined
                  in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly,
                  of (a) 20 percent or more, but not more than 50 percent, of
                  the combined voting power of the Company's outstanding
                  securities ordinarily having the right to vote at elections of
                  directors, unless the transaction resulting in such ownership
                  has been approved in advance by the "continuity directors," as
                  defined at Subsection (b), or (b) more than 50 percent of the
                  combined voting power of the Company's outstanding securities
                  ordinarily having the right to vote at elections of directors
                  (regardless of any approval by the continuity directors).

         2. To record this Amendment to the Severance Pay Plan as set forth
above, the Company has caused this Amendment to be signed on its behalf by its
Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer as of the date first set
forth above.

OPTICAL SENSORS INCORPORATED


By: /s/ Paulita M. LaPlante
    -----------------------------------------
    Paulita M. LaPlante
    President and Chief Executive Officer

By: /s/ Wesley G. Peterson
    -----------------------------------------
    Wesley G. Peterson
    Chief Financial Officer
S. 1482 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen 

An Act 

To improve and reauthorize provisions relating to the application of the antitrust 

laws to the award of need-based educational aid. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Need-Based Educational Aid 

Act of 2015’’. 

SEC. 2. EXTENSION RELATING TO THE APPLICATION OF THE 

ANTRITRUST LAWS TO THE AWARD OF NEED-BASED EDUCATIONAL AID. 

Section 568 of the Improving America’s Schools Act of 1994 

(15 U.S.C. 1 note) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)— 

(A) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘or’’ after the semicolon; 

(B) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘; or’’ and inserting 

a period at the end; and 

(C) by striking paragraph (4); and 

(2) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘2015’’ and inserting 

‘‘2022’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 9036]

# SUMMARY:

                        The Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation is renewing its charter for a period of two years. This Advisory Committee will continue to make recommendations to the Historian and the Department of State on all aspects of the Department's program to publish the                         *Foreign Relations of the United States*                         series as well as on the Department's responsibility under statute (22 U.S.C. 4351,                         *et seq.*) to open its 30-year old and older records for public review at the National Archives and Records Administration. The Committee consists of nine members drawn from among historians, political scientists, archivists, international lawyers, and other social scientists who are distinguished in the field of U.S. foreign relations.                    

                        Questions concerning the Committee and the renewal of its Charter should be directed to Stephen P. Randolph, Executive Secretary, Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation, Department of State, Office of the Historian, 2300 E Street NW., Washington, DC, 20372 (Navy Potomac Annex), telephone (202) 955-0215 (email                         *history@state.gov*).                    

Dated: January 28, 2015.

Stephen P. Randolph,

Executive Secretary, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2015-03312 Filed 2-17-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-11-P
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Jay A. Herman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Delphax TechnologiesInc. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:
(1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) the information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.     Date August 11, 2004 /s/ Jay A. HermanJay A. HermanChairman and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23(ii)


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

          We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this
Registration Statement on Form S-8 of our report dated March 12, 1998, with
respect to the financial statements for the years ended December 31, 1996 and
1997 of Talk Visual Corporation included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended December 31, 1998 and appearing in Talk Visual Corporation's
Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus /Notification of Merger dated May 28, 1999.

                                    BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

Los Angeles, California
June 4, 1999
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intergraph Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, James F. Taylor, Jr., Chief
Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


/s/ James F. Taylor, Jr.
-------------------------
James F. Taylor, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2002
Exhibit 11

                         AUTOINFO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        Calculation of Earnings Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          Nine Months Ended          Three Months Ended
                                            September 30,               September 30,
                                           1997          1996         1997          1996
                                       -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
<S>                                    <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>         
Primarily and fully diluted earnings:
Loss from operations applicable
  to common stock                      $  (826,328)  $(3,632,822)  $(2,636,007)  $(3,095,320)
                                       -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
Shares:
  Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding            8,018,752     7,918,329     8,018,752     8,000,615
                                       -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------

Primary and fully diluted loss
  per common share:                    $      (.10)  $      (.46)  $      (.32)  $      (.39)
                                       -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
</TABLE>