alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,554,677
<SECURITIES>                                   773,924
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,244,918
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                 10,723,475
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,917,856
<PP&E>                                       4,360,658
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,301,131
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,977,383
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,580,904
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       615,104
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,750,330
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,977,383
<SALES>                                     10,566,743
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,566,743
<CGS>                                        4,871,028
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,803,419
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,841
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,275,517)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (446,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (829,517)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (829,517)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Operations
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such consolidated financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,091
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,765
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        585
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,972
<PP&E>                                          12,943
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,697
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            74
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,231
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,535
<SALES>                                         84,090
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                84,090
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,639
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,085
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,366
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,480
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,886
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,886
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.54
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.2

                       HOMECAPITAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION
                               EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                                              THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED 
                                                                      JUNE 30, 
                                                                 1998          1997
                                                             ------------   -----------
<S>                                                          <C>            <C>
BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
  Net income (loss)                                          $(3,449,816)   $   210,352 
  Less preferred stock dividends                                 (64,232)       (67,315)
                                                             -----------    -----------
  Net income (loss) for common stockholders                  $(3,514,048)   $   143,037 
                                                             ===========    ===========
  Weighted average shares outstanding during the period        8,295,525      8,226,883 
                                                             ===========    ===========
  Basic earnings (loss) per common share                     $      (.42)   $       .02  
                                                             ===========    ===========
DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
  Net income (loss) for common stockholders                  $(3,514,048)   $   143,037
                                                             ===========    ===========
  Weighted average shares outstanding during the period        8,295,525      8,226,883
  Common stock equivalents                                         /(1)/        619,875
  Assume conversion of preferred stock                             /(1)/      1,500,000
                                                             -----------    -----------
  Weighted average common shares outstanding                   8,295,525     10,346,758
                                                             ===========    ===========
  Diluted earnings (loss) per common share                   $      (.42)   $       .02
                                                             ===========    ===========
 
</TABLE>
______________

/(1)/  Excluded due to antidilutive effect.
#### Stein, Respondent, vs. Lex Construction Company, Appellant.

For the appellant: *J. H. Beuscher*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *William F. Shaughnessy*and *Oscar M. Nebelj*both of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

l@lORANDill'i FOR: Exe cu ti ve Secretary, USCIB 

SUBJEC~ Clearance for Category III CClrlINT 

13 August 1954 

1. I am atta·ching herewith a copy of a letter received by the 

Director of Central Intelligence from Dr. Arthur S. Flemming, 

Director, Office of Defense Mobilization. 

2. As a result of discussion by USCIB at its 90th meeting on 

11 September 1953, Dr. Flenuning was indoctrinated f'or access to 

COMIN'f by this Agency in connection with his attendance at meetings 

of the National Security Council and consequent participation in 

discussions which include CCMINT. As Dr. Flemming's deputy, it is 

believed that the same conditions prevail with regard to Mr. Cooley. 

3. In accordance with the provisions of Directive No. 5 , it 

is requested that USCIB members determine the "need to know" of 

Mr. Cooley, and that I be so advised. Dr. Flemming is being informed 

of the necessity for this action. 

FOR THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE: 

Enclosure: 

(SIGNED) 

HUNTINGTON D. SHELDON 

CIA Member, USCIB 

Fllclosure with USCIB 13. 2/26 dtd 18 Aug 1954. 

SECRET 

eclassified and a roved or release b NS on 09-29-2014 ursuantt E.O. 1352
Amendment to Contract of Sale related to 100 & 200 Campus Drive



 Exhibit 10.6 
 AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT OF SALE 
 This AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT OF SALE (this
“Amendment”) dated as of July 25, 2008 by and between 100/200 CAMPUS DRIVE, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, having an address at 245 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10167 (“Seller”) and KBS CAPITAL
ADVISORS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, having an address at 590 Madison Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, New York 10022 (“Purchaser”). 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, Seller and Purchaser entered into that certain Contract of Sale, dated as of
July 17, 2008 (the “Contract”). 
 WHEREAS, Seller and Purchaser desire to amend the terms of the Contract as hereinafter set
forth. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth in this Amendment, in consideration of other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, Seller and Purchaser hereby covenant and agree as follows: 
 1. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Contract. 
 2. The reference to “July 25, 2008” set forth in Section 4.6 of the Contract shall be deleted and replaced with “July 30,
2008”. 
 3. Except insofar as reference to the contrary is made in any such instrument, all references to the “Contract of
Sale” in any future correspondence or notice shall be deemed to refer to the Contract as modified by this Amendment. 
 4. Except as
expressly modified or amended by this Amendment, all of the terms, covenants and conditions of the Contract are hereby ratified and confirmed. 
 5. This Amendment may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were on the same instrument. 
 6. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New Jersey, without regard to principles of conflicts of
laws. 
 7. Delivery of this Amendment by facsimile by any party shall represent a valid and binding execution and delivery of this Amendment
by such party. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Seller and Purchaser have executed and delivered this Amendment as of the date
first above written. 
  

					
	SELLER:
	
	100/200 CAMPUS DRIVE, L.L.C.
		
	By:	 	Campus Drive Realty Holding Co., Inc.
			
		 	By:	 	 /s/ Cavarly E. Garrett

		 	Name:	 	Cavarly E. Garrett
		 	Title:	 	Vice President


 [Signatures continued on the next page] 







 [Signatures continued from previous page] 
  

			
	PURCHASER:
	
	KBS CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC,
	a Delaware limited liability company
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.

	Name:	 	Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.
	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT FEBRUARY
28, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND THE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
FEBRUARY 28, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                       1,178,566
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,026,454
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,340,518
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,850,365
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,674,063
<BONDS>                                        106,595
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,283
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,054,424
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,850,365
<SALES>                                      4,534,272
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,563,731
<CGS>                                        2,399,849
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,399,849
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               325,607
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,381
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                219,804
<INCOME-TAX>                                    44,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            175,804
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   175,804
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
USCIB: 13. 5/90 

REF ID:A59293 

-----eot;FiDENTiAt 

24 

00NFIBEllff IkEi 

l December 1954 0 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Compromise of COMINT Codeword. 

Reference: USCIB Directive Number 9. 

1. The enclosed swnmary of a compromise of the secret codeword. 

is circulated for information. 

2. THE ENCLOSURE WI'IH THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS COMMUNICATIONS 

INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION AND SHALL BE HANDLED ONLY IN CHANNELS PROVIDED EXPRESSLY FOR COMINT. 

Enclosure 

a/s 

USCIB: 13.5/90 

, 

COf\'FfBE.'JFIAL 

ecla si ied a roved or release b N A on 1 ursuant to . . 1 
I .,. • • • 

--

COMPR.Ot~ISE OF O)MUiT INFOR.Mt,TION 

On 21 August 1954 a physical Compromise of the SECRET CODEWORD 

occurred at Wildwood Station, APO 728, U. S. Anuy. On that date a 

letter, prepared by the Army Security Aeency, Alaska, containing the 

CODEWORD was received at Wildwoc<I Station improperly classified. 

·The letter, following regular post distr~bution channels, was 

unaccountably delayed between its receipt on 21 August and the section 

tor which it was intended on 25 August 1954. Six (6) individuals in 

the military service, not authorbed acce.~s to CODE1.JORD material, 

handled this letter. Because of .their clearance status and the fact 

that these persons were not inunediately sworn to secrecy the SECR~"'T 

CODElrlORD must be considered compromised. 

The following actions were taken to preclude a recurrence of 

this type violation. The form letter used in the subject violation 

has been revised to reduce the possibility of insertion of CODEHORDS 

in making entries. An orientation on protecting CODi!:'1'10HDS and 

material will be given to all personnel authorized to handle such 

material. Special orientation for the two persons immediately 

responsible has been accomplished. 

-., 

€0NFIDENTIAL
**Exhibit 21.1**

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF GOLD BANC CORPORATION, INC.****AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2003**

GBC Kansas, Inc., a Kansas corporationGold Bank, a Kansas bankGold IHC-I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company Gold RE Holdings-I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company GBC Oklahoma, Inc., a Kansas corporation Gold Bank, an Oklahoma bank Gold-BK Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation Central Oklahoma Leasing Authority, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation GBC Florida, Inc., a Kansas corporation AB Properties of Manatee, Inc., a Florida corporation ABI Capital Trust, a Delaware trust Gold Bank, a Florida bank Gold IHC-III, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company Gold RE Holdings-III, LLC, a Florida limited liabilitycompany Gold Financial Services, Inc., a Kansas corporation Gold Trust Company, a Missouri trust company Gold Capital Management, Inc., a Kansas corporation Gold Insurance Agency, Inc., a Kansas corporation Gold Investment Advisors, Inc., a Kansas corporation GBS Holding Company, LLC, a Kansas limited liability company Gold Title Agency, LLC, a Kansas limited liability company Gold Merchant Banc, Inc., a Kansas corporation Old Ballgame, L.L.C., a Missouri limited liability company Gold Reinsurance Company, Ltd., a Turks and Caicos Islands corporation CompuNet Engineering, Inc., a Kansas corporation Regional Holding Company, Inc., a Kansas corporation Gold Banc Mortgage, Inc, aKansas corporation Realty Escrow Services, Inc., a Kansas corporation GBCI Capital Trust, a Delaware business trustGBCI Capital Trust II, a Delaware business trustGold Banc Acquisition Corporation VIII, Inc., a Kansas corporationGold Banc Acquisition Corporation X, Inc., a Kansas corporation
• 

. . OP.ERA1'.IONAL . IMUEDif .:E 

lJ.· 12 

15· !4: 

COP':. SEI~T., 

AGI # 1.3052 

FROM: USF 61 

~O: 

, 

! 

Dm.APSA 

.. - PP.GE l OI 1 

1409~>4Z l JG 52 

FOR 281. 1YOUR l,1506Z, NOMBIR 68,, RECEIVED IN OV~AR. 

CIA. CRYP'J:O PERSONNEJ:. HAIDiOO !JCY.L' C EARED FOR COMI·fl: •. . . ~HERE.FORE• CONSD:Jgfl CODE VOBD "CHU'l '" .HAS ~N COM:'ROM:~ iED 

FOI NR: 15966 

DA~'.E RECD: '141,lSZ Atn 52 

' . PARAPHRASE NO~ REQUJF. O. 

CONSUIIJ: CRYPJ:OOE?mm BEPJFiE D.E LASSIFYiiO. 

SEEHJRB'Y JliP&RMA'ifO 

., 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-06-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

TOP SECRET
|   | 1. | The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ Peter G. Dornau              |
|--------|----------------------------------|
|   | Peter G. Dornau                  |
|   | Chairman of the Board, President |
|   | and Chief Executive Officer      |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer)    |

----
# CE2004078EN.01059001.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/590 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/590

---

(2004/C 78 E/0623)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3561/03

by Jan Andersson (PSE) to the Commission

(1 December 2003)

Subject:   ‘Parasubordinated’ workers and social dumping

Subject:

A problem which has arisen within the Swedish labour market over the past few years, mainly in the construction sector, is that workers from the candidate countries are working for pay and under working conditions far interior to those offered by Swedish collective agreements. These workers, from Poland and elsewhere, are able to evade the existing regulations by being given the status of self-employed workers, in spite of the fact that they should to all intents and purposes be regarded as employees. Behind this arrangement is often a kind of hiring firm which acts as an agency supplying the services of the foreign workers to the Swedish contractors, and helps them to obtain the ‘F tax certificates’ and other required documentation. The hiring firms in these cases should clearly be regarded as employers, but they act on the basis that they are merely an agency for services carried out by self-employed workers.

If this practice increases in extent, it will lead to widespread social dumping. The situation is surely not unique to Sweden.

| 1. | What is the Commission's view of this situation? |
| --- | --- |

1.

What is the Commission's view of this situation?

| 2. | Does the Commission propose to take any measures with a view to dealing with this problem? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does the Commission propose to take any measures with a view to dealing with this problem?

Answer given by Ms Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(22 January 2004)

(22 January 2004)

It is not clear from the Honourable Member's question whether the circumstances described fall within the scope of Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (1).

1

In the case of postings within the meaning of this Directive, the definition of a worker is that which applies in the law of the Member State on the territory of which the worker is posted, according to Article 2(2).

If, however, these are placements with the objective of having the workers habitually perform their work in Sweden, the ratione personae scope of the working and employment conditions is, in general, also determined by Swedish law.

In view of this, it is up to the host Member State to ensure that the category of persons mentioned by the Honourable Member is covered by its worker protection legislation.

---

(1)  OJ L 18, 21.1.1997.

1

---
Memo to: EPA Docket ( EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0218)

Subject: Copyrighted reference provided by Ms. Kay Hawklee in oral comments at Public Hearing

about the proposed rulemaking “National Emission St andards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs)-Radon from Operating Uranium M ill Tailings”, Subpart W of 40
CFR Part 61.

Ms Kay Hawklee provided hearing panel with the foll owing reference in her oral comments delivered in the Subpart W Public Hearing held in Denver, Colora do, on September 4, 2014:

Mudd, Gavin M. 2008. "Radon Releases from Australia n Uranium Mining and Milling Projects: Assessing the UNSCEAR Approach." Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 99 288-315.

The abstract of the reference is as follows—

Abstract

The release of radon gas and progeny from the minin g and milling of uranium-bearing ores has long been recognised as a potential radiological health hazard. The standards for exposure to radon and progeny have decreased over time as the understandi ng of their health risk has improved. In recent years there has been debate on the long-term releas es (10,000 years) of radon from uranium mining and milling sites, focusing on abandoned, operation al and rehabilitated sites. The primary purpose has been estimates of the radiation exposure of both lo cal and global populations. Although there has been an increasing number of radon release studies over recent years in the USA, Australia, Canada and elsewhere, a systematic evaluation of this work has yet to be published in the international literatur e. This paper presents a detailed compilation and anal ysis of Australian studies. In order to quantify ra don sources, a review of data on uranium mining and mil ling wastes in Australia, as they influence radon releases, is presented. An extensive compilation of the available radon release data is then assembled for the various projects, including a comparison to predictions of radon behaviour where available. An analysis of cumulative radon releases is then devel oped and compared to the UNSCEAR approach. The implications for the various assessments of long-te rm releases of radon are discussed, including aspec ts such as the need for ongoing monitoring of rehabili tation at uranium mining and milling sites and life

cycle accounting.