alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998    
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998    
<CASH>                                          22,792
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           9,741
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                19,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    138,915
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          54,946
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            55,797
<LOANS>                                        372,479
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,436
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 644,912
<DEPOSITS>                                     581,493
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,559
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,351
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,973
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,988
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 644,912
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 17,454
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,115
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   721
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                23,290
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,077
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,298
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,992
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      938
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  (8)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,196
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,260
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,260
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,905
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.50
<LOANS-NON>                                        524
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,595
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  3,540
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,170
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      846
<RECOVERIES>                                       174
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,436
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,436
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            207
        


</TABLE>
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release #06-16

Contact: (703) 808-5050 September 23, 2016

Senate Confirmation and Presidential Appointment of Susan S. Gibson as 

NRO Inspector General 

The Senate confirmed and the President officially appointed 

Susan S. Gibson as the first Presidentially appointed and 

Senate-confirmed Inspector General for the National 

Reconnaissance Office. 

“I am pleased to hear the United States Senate confirmed 

the nomination of Ms. Gibson. Susan’s impressive 

background, extensive Intelligence Community experience, 

and superior integrity will enhance the NRO’s strong 

corporate governance and its stewardship of taxpayer 

dollars. I’m certain she will help the NRO continue to operate efficiently and with 

greater transparency,” said NRO Director Betty Sapp. 

Prior to joining the NRO, Ms. Gibson served as Principal Deputy General 

Counsel for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence since April 2012, 

providing invaluable legal guidance on issues concerning intelligence reform, 

government procurement and fiscal law, privacy and information sharing, ethics, 

and administrative law, among other areas. In 2015, Ms. Gibson received a 

Presidential Meritorious Rank Award for her “sustained extraordinary 

accomplishment” as a career member of the Senior Executive Service. 

Ms. Gibson served for more than 20 years in the Army Judge Advocate 

General’s Corps, retiring as a Colonel. During her military career, she 

prosecuted and defended at court-martials; taught criminal law, constitutional 

law, and law of armed conflict at the U.S. Military Academy, West Point; was the 

Deputy Staff Judge Advocate for Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland; the Staff 

Judge Advocate for the Army’s Criminal Investigation Command; a senior 

attorney at U.S. Pacific Command; and provided legal advice on intelligence 

operations at the Defense Intelligence Agency.

(Cont’d)

The Honorable 

Susan S. Gibson
Ms. Gibson received her B.A. from Monmouth College, Illinois; her J.D. from 

Seattle University; and two LL.M.s: one in Military and Operational Law from the 

Army Judge Advocate General’s School, and a second in National Security Law 

from the University of Virginia.

Ms. Gibson is a strong advocate of service to others. She was General Counsel 

for Women in Technology, a non-profit organization dedicated to advancing 

women in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics

(STEM). Ms. Gibson served on the Board of Directors for the City of Fairfax 

Theatre Company and as an Ambassador for the Shakespeare Theatre 

Company.

-NROThe NRO is a joint Department of Defense-Intelligence Community organization responsible for 

developing, launching, and operating America’s intelligence satellites to meet the national 

security needs of our nation.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-19127,333-19145, 333-80187, 333-42444, 333-52236, 333-77006 and 333-121074) and on Form S-3(Nos. 333-91211, 333-152707) for Cornell Companies, Inc. of ourreport dated March 6, 2009 relating to the consolidated financialstatements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,which appears in this Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2).

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP

PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP

Houston,Texas

August 14, 2009

 

----
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

GROVERSELLERS 

ATTORNEY GENERAL 

fioaorible T. U. Trlmbl~ 

Flret ;rrslstant 

Stat. iiuparintendent of Publio fn8trUOtlOn 

hu;t in, Teiar 

Thirty-ninth fauielatulri, 

aatually 1A faot repeal.. 

the exemption olauae. ai,: 

ffouw ail1 No. 586, TMrtysecond: LegielatureP (Greatin6 lla IAdOpOAdeAt SO&O01 

Di8trlot) 

.~. 

me era in rweipt oi your letter or recent dste, readiag ~3 r0110w8: 

We would llkn to call your attsntloa to H. 

9. xo. 5593, irota, oi the 32nd Lagislntura, 1911, 

meatlog the Sriggr IA4epeAdcat Soho District in 

Uurnet County, aa vmll a8 to S. B. Xo. 227, Aots of 

tim 39th Legislature, 1923, whioh undertook to repeal 

a portion or 9, B. NO. !%5 with rorareAO0 to exeqtion rr0i4 cousty supervision. 

~59x1 cotmthitutlon, ..rtlolr 3, Lh3otlon 57, reierring to looal bills, providea thut no local bill 

14th certain eraeptione may be fntroduoed without 

having flret been pQbllshed for thirty days, and thut 

such publictition sust acompany the local bill in the 

Legislature. 

“Please advise us whether or not 3. B. No. 227, 

:iCtS ot the 39th Legislature, 1925, actually in fact 

lepeoled the exemption clause of H. B. Xo. 585, .;cts 

of the 32nd Legislature, 1911.” 

..^ 
HoAOrlible T. ;b. Trimble, page 2 

IA the year 1925, Seation 5 of titicle 7 authorized 

the Legisl&ure to oreute school dlatriote by speoial law, without 

the notice required by article 3, SeOtiOA 56. See Powell Y. Charoo 

IAdepeAaent ~abool Xstrict, 203, 9. i'i. 1178. Seotion 3 of artiole 7 was amended at the November election 1926, since whioh tine 

the Legislature nsy create sohool distrlcteby geAbrk3.lsWs.OAly. 

You are advised, thererore, that Senate Bill No.:'227, 

Hots of the 39th Legislature, whioh was passed prior to t* 1926 

amend-at is OOAstitUtioAal eAd repealed the eXemptioA clauee Or 

House Bill 585, AQte ot the 32Ad Legislature, 1911. 

Yours very truly 

irasistant 

CFG:EFP
• -TOP-SECRET- •

414 4.111141.&1111.41.11.11. •••••70100

MO•R Si,,..

-(St NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON, D.C.

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR February 13, 1970

MEMORANDUM FOR THE DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

SUBJECT: Consolidation of U-28 Fleets

Following our conversation with Bob. Naka on

Tuesday, February 3, 1970, he reconvened his committee and

produced a report with additional'information on the funds

provided by the Central Intelligence Agency and the

Air Force in support of the U-2 Program. The attached

report contains the NIP costs for the options we discussed,

the "national cost" for the total program, the "national

cost" with consolidation, and the cost of having the Chinese

overflight capabilitY4IIIIIIIIIW •

I trust we have supplied you with the information

you requested.

Atte hment

623-70, Same subj.

IDEALIST

ft ...

comet %woe

TOP-SECRETiiststeID ..Music 822400•1

INN 00280.2 ISM Is 802s III 4820

624-70

cNt 02 gnu
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-3604

___________ David Washington Spikes; * Monique Caldwell Spikes, * * Appellants, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Arkansas. * Century Management, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: May 4, 2000 Filed: May 18, 2000

___________ Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. DavidWashington Spikes and Monique Caldwell Spikes appeal the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in the Spikes' negligence action against Century Management, Inc. Having considered the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude the grant of judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. We thus affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

We deny Century Management's motions to strike portions of the Spikes' appendix. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Lattice, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June  30, 2013 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul Burgess, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: August 14,
    2013 | By: | /s/ Paul Burgess                                            
|------------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------
|                          |     | Paul Burgess
        President (principal executive officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-36978, 333-94831, 333-93939, 333-93937, 333-87355, 333-65933 and 333-18047
of Twinlab Corporation each on Form S-8 of our report dated March 21, 2002
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Twinlab Corporation for the year
ended December 31, 2001.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Jericho, New York
March 29, 2002
CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Dione Bitzer, Chief Financial Officer of Almaden Minerals Ltd. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with

the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  March 28, 2007





Signed:  /s/Dione Bitzer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1079

EDWARD P. CRAIG, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; MARK W. EVERSON,

Director,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District

Judge. (CA-03-908-A)

Submitted: March 25, 2004 Decided: April 1, 2004

Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward P. Craig, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth L. Greene, Karen

Deborah Utiger, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,

D.C.; Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney,

Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Edward P. Craig, Jr., appeals from the district court’s

order dismissing his complaint in which he sought a refund of

income taxes. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Craig v. Internal Rev. Serv., No. CA-03-908-A

(E.D. Va. filed Dec. 23, 2003; entered Dec. 24, 2003). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2005106EN.01002102.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/21

---

Removal from the register of Case C-58/03 (1)

1

(2005/C 106/42)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

By order of 24 January 2005, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-58/03 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State): Y.G. Encheva v Staatssecretaris van Justitie.

---

(1)  OJ C 83 of 05.04.2003.

1

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00313-CV

In re Eureka Holdings Acquisitions, L.P.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Relator Eureka Holdings Acquisitions, L.P. has filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus and motion for temporary relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.1, 52.10(a). We grant the 

motion and temporarily stay only the portions of the trial court’s April 27, 2022 order relating to 

the expunction of the lis pendens pending further order of this Court. See id. 52.10(b). The 

Court orders the real party in interest to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or 

before June 13, 2022.

It is ordered on June 3, 2022.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I In connection with the quarterly report of Science Dynamics Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Joe Noto, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


August 16, 2006                     /s/ Joe Noto
                                    -----------------------
                                    Joe Noto
                                    Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit (32)(1)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of C-COR Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Woodle, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to my knowledge:

1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|                                                   
|/s/ DAVID A. WOODLE                                
|David A. Woodle Chief Executive Officer May 9, 2007
UNITED STAT&> COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE BOARD 

DIRECTIVE I 6 

(Approved by USCIB on 11 March 1949) 

(Revised as ot 18 April 1952) 

')? 

I • 
.... 

UMIT.BD STATES CCllMUNICATI<JlS INTELLIGENCE BOARD 

m!!!f&TIVE fi9. . (Revised as ot 18 April 1952) 

INSTRUCTIC.S FOR THE PROTECTION OF 

CCllINT CODD«>RDS 

1. Regulations tor the dissemination• handling and aateguarcling 

ot COONT will: 

a. Refer to the COONT codewords anq generical.q, and v:lll 

not list specific codevords. Theee regulations v:lll be so drafted 

that th97 will not thamaelve• require designation b7 a cmmrr codeword, and w.l.ll thus avoid such designation. 

b. Clearq provide tor the cantinuoua safeguarding and aecur1t7 ot superseded COMINT codewords, and mterial covered b7 them, 

u well as ot current mes. 

c. Specif.r the procedure for reporting possible canpraniaes 

of codewords, including 1nst:ruc1i1ms to insure that such report.a 

will be forwarded without del.a7 and 'bJ' the moat expeditious means 

possible through adm1 rd strative COONT channels to the USCIB 

Coordinator for action. 

2. Knowledge ot specific current and ncn-current COONT codewords 

will be disseminated by each member organization in accordance with the 

basic securit;r regulatims and to the ex.tent necessar:r to insure ccmipliance with these regulations, and in a manner appropriate to that organization' s administrative arrangmnants and procedures. 

~TOP SECRET
## IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-20072 Summary Calendar
NING HAW CHANG, Plaintiff-Appellant

v. CITY OF HOUSTON, Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CV-2570
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### The district court granted the City of H o uston’s motion for summary judgment, rejecting the plaintiff’s claim of racial discrimination in employment. Reviewing the record de novo, we AFFIRM essentially for the reasons given by 1 

### the district court in its Memorandum and Order. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

## F I L E D Janu ary31 , 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this opi nion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. See He rna ndezv . Yel low T ra nsp ., Inc. , 641 F.3d118 , 124 (5t h Cir

. 2011)

. 1 

### Case: 11-20072 Document: 00511742504 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/31/2012
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1573

MARGARET I. ENDRES, for Joseph Endres

(deceased),

Petitioner,

versus

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR;

CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(00-624-BLA)

Submitted: September 25, 2001 Decided: October 15, 2001

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

C. Patrick Carrick, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Petitioner.

William S. Mattingly, JACKSON & KELLY, P.L.L.C., Morgantown, West

Virginia, for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Margaret I. Endres, the widow of Joseph Endres, petitions for

review of a decision of the Benefits Review Board (Board) affirming

the administrative law judge’s decision to deny her claim for black

lung benefits. Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s

decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Doss v. Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation

Programs, 53 F.3d 654, 658 (4th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the Board. See Endres v. Consolidation Coal

Co., BRB No. 00-624-BLA (B.R.B. Apr. 6, 2001). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
****

****

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intergraph Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R. Halsey Wise, President andChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

          (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                     of the Company.

By:         /s/ R. Halsey WiseName:    R. Halsey Wise                                 Title:       President and Chief Executive OfficerDate:      May 24, 2004      

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Intergraph Corporation and will be retained by Intergraph Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]