alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 36 (Tuesday, February 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9693-9694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03772]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-9-2015]

Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 134--Chattanooga, Tennessee; 
Notification of Proposed Production Activity; Volkswagen Group of 
America Chattanooga Operations, LLC; (Motor Vehicles); Chattanooga, 
Tennessee

    The Chattanooga Chamber Foundation, grantee of FTZ 134, submitted a 
notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board on behalf 
of Volkswagen Group of America Chattanooga Operations, LLC (VGACO), 
located in Chattanooga, Tennessee. The notification conforming to the 
requirements of the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR 400.22) was 
received on January 23, 2015.
    VGACO already has authority to produce passenger sedans, sport 
utility vehicles, and minivans within Site 3 of FTZ 134. The current 
request would add certain foreign-status materials and

[[Page 9694]]

components to the scope of authority. Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), 
additional FTZ authority would be limited to the specific foreign-
status materials and components and specific finished products 
described in the submitted notification (as described below) and 
subsequently authorized by the FTZ Board.
    Production under FTZ procedures could exempt VGACO from customs 
duty payments on the foreign status materials and components used in 
export production. On its domestic sales, VGACO would be able to choose 
the duty rate during customs entry procedures that applies to passenger 
motor vehicles (duty rate 2.5%) for the foreign status materials and 
components noted below and in the existing scope of authority. Customs 
duties also could possibly be deferred or reduced on foreign status 
production equipment.
    The materials and components sourced from abroad include: Polyvinyl 
chloride (PVC) hoses; PVC sheets; adhesive tapes; reading coils; and, 
interface USB hubs (duty rate ranges from free to 5.8%).
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary at the 
address below. The closing period for their receipt is April 6, 2015.
    A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection 
at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, 
Room 21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230-0002, and in the ``Reading Room'' section of the 
FTZ Board's Web site, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz.
    For further information, contact Pierre Duy at [email protected] 
or (202) 482-1378.

    Dated: February 6, 2015.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-03772 Filed 2-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```
# NSA Issues Guidance on Zero Trust Security Model 

/ Published Feb. 25, 2021
FORT MEADE, Md., 
The National Security Agency published a cybersecurity product, “Embracing a Zero Trust Security Model,” on Thursday. This product shows how deploying Zero Trust security principles can better position cybersecurity professionals to secure enterprise networks and sensitive data. To provide NSA’s customers with a foundational understanding of Zero Trust, this product discusses its benefits along with potential challenges, and makes recommendations for implementing Zero Trust within their networks.

The Zero Trust model eliminates trust in any one element, node, or service by assuming that a breach is inevitable or has already occurred. The data-centric security model constantly limits access while also looking for anomalous or malicious activity.

Adopting the Zero Trust mindset and leveraging Zero Trust principles will enable systems administrators to control how users, processes, and devices engage with data. These principles can prevent the abuse of compromised user credentials, remote exploitation, or insider threats, and even mitigate effects of supply chain malicious activity.

NSA strongly recommends that a Zero Trust security model be considered for all critical networks within National Security Systems, the Department of Defense’s critical networks, and Defense Industrial Base critical networks and systems. NSA notes that Zero Trust principles should be implemented in most aspects of a network and its operations ecosystems to become fully effective. To address potential challenges of implementing Zero Trust solutions, NSA is developing and will release additional guidance in the coming months.

NSA seeks to regularly release unique, actionable, and timely cybersecurity guidance to strengthen the cybersecurity of the nation and its allies at scale. For more information or other cybersecurity products, visit NSA.gov/cybersecurity-guidance.
**Exhibit 10.21**
Shereen P. Jones joined the Company to serve as its Executive Vice President,Chief Financial and Investment Officer on February 25, 2002. Ms. Jones’ annualbase salary for 2002 is $265,000. Ms. Jones is entitled to anannual bonus of upto 82.5% of her annual base salary based upon performance criteria establishedby the Board of Directors. Ms. Jones would be entitled to severance in theamount of two times her then base salary and 50% of her maximum bonus potentialfor each of the two years as well as continuation of benefits for up to a twoyear period and immediate vesting of all unvested share options and sharegrants in the event of a change in control of the Company or if she isterminated without cause. Ms. Jones is entitled to the use of an automobile,medical and dental benefits, vacation and sick leave and certain other benefitsavailable to the Company’s other executive officers. Ms. Jones was grantedoptions to purchase an aggregate of 250,000 Common Shares under the Company’sLong-Term Incentive Plan at an exercise price of $8.40. A total of100,000 of Ms. Jones’ optionsvest ratably over a three year period commencing with her hire date.The remaining 150,000 options vest only if the Company’s common share pricemeets targeted thresholds within four years of her hire date. Upon hiring, Ms. Jones was also granted 15,000restricted common shares which vest ratably over three years. An additional5,000 restricted common shares were awarded as a matching grant vesting overthree years as Ms. Jones purchased 5,000 shares upon employment with theCompany. Up to an additional 45,000 restricted common shares may be earned byMs. Jones upon the Company’s common share price achieving establishedthresholds as mentioned above. In addition, as each threshold is met (three in total), Ms.Jones has the right to receive a 5,000 restricted common share matching grantupon her purchase of 5,000 common shares at its current price. The Company also agreed to reimburse Ms. Jones for certain of her relocationexpenses.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP,  INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements on Form S-8 pertaining to the
Italian Employees Warrant Program (No. 333-87743), the 1998 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan (No. 333-87739), the 1997 Incentive and Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan
(Nos. 333-87735, 333-47896 and 333-81956), the 2000 MRV Communications, Inc. Stock Option Plan for Employees of Optronics International Corp.
(No. 333-47898), the 2000 MRV Communications, Inc. Stock Option Plan for Employees of Astroterra Corporation (No. 333-47900), the 2001 MRV
Communications, Inc. Stock Option Plan For Employees Of Appointech, Inc. (No. 333-71180), the MRV Communications, Inc. 2002 International Stock Option Plan
(No. 333-81954), the MRV Communications, Inc. 2002 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan for Employees Of LuminentOIC, Inc. (No. 333-81958), the
LuminentOIC Inc. Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan (No. 333-81950) and Non-Director and Non-Executive Officer Consolidated
Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (Nos. 333-107109 and 333-129364); of our reports dated October 7, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of MRV Communications, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of MRV Communications, Inc., included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLPLos Angeles, California
October 7, 2009


---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1



                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              WASHINGTON, DC 20549
                                        
                                        
                               FORM 10-Q/A No. 1


[X]  QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES 
     EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

               FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998

                                       OR

[ ]  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES 
     EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


                  FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ____ TO ____


                     AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
                            11222 QUAIL ROOST DRIVE
                              MIAMI, FLORIDA 33157
                                 (305) 253-2244


Commission File Number:                                        0-9633

State of Incorporation:                                       Florida


I.R.S. Employer Identification Number:                     59-1985922

Indicate, by check mark, whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports 
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the 
registrant was required to file such report), and (2) has been subject to such 
filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES  X   NO
    ---     ---

Common Stock - Par Value $1.00
43,070,782 Shares Outstanding on November 3, 1998

<PAGE>   2



                                   SIGNATURE


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the 
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the 
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



                                            AMERICAN BANKERS
                                            INSURANCE GROUP, INC.



January 26, 1999                                   /s/ Robert Hill
                                            ------------------------------
                                                      Robert Hill 
                                             Principal Accounting Officer



<PAGE>   3




                     AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                               SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
                                  (unaudited)



Item 5 - Continued



Other:

Any holder of the Company's common stock, par value $1.00, who intends to 
present a proposal at the 1999 annual shareholder's meeting may do so by 
following the procedures described in Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange 
Act of 1934 and the Company's bylaws. If any holder wishes to have the proposal 
included in the Company's proxy statement for the 1999 annual meeting, the 
Corporate Secretary must receive the proposal at the Company's headquarters by 
5:00 pm on March [12], 1999. The Corporate Secretary is Arthur W. Heggen and the
Company's headquarters is located at 11222 Quail Roost Drive, Miami, Florida
33157-6596.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6195

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. TYRONE LAWRENCE HARRIS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter Dekalb Kelley, Jr., District Judge. (2:06-cr-00031-WDK-TEM-01; 2:07-cv-00202-WDK)

Submitted: May 26, 2009 Decided: June 15, 2009

Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Lawrence Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Robert John Krask, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Tyrone Lawrence Harris has filed an appeal from the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2008) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006).

Because the district court has issued a certificate of appealability on Harris’s first claim, whether counsel was ineffective for failing to note an appeal, we have considered this claim on the merits. Finding no clear error in the district court’s credibility determinations, we uphold the court’s finding that counsel was not directed to file a notice of appeal and did not have a duty to consult with Harris under Roe v. Flores-Ortega , 528 U.S. 470, 478-80 (2000). We therefore affirm the district court’s order in part. We will not issue a certificate of appealability as to Harris’s remaining claims absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

23 Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Harris has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability as to Harris’s remaining three claims and dismiss the appeal in part. We deny Harris’s pending motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Matthew W. Long, certify that:

 

1.                                       I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Supreme Industries, Inc.; and

 

2.                                       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date:   March 26, 2012 | /s/   Matthew W. Long     |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------|
|                        | Matthew   W. Long         |
|                        | Chief   Financial Officer |

 

----
.. 

USCIB: 5 • .3/101 

1 July 1955 

CONF!'.Dmn'I1lL - 6.5. E?E5 ONLY 

MEMORANDUM ' FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIBEC: 

Subject: Tentative Minutes. 

l. Forwarded herewith is a cow of the Tentative Minutes of the 

Thirty-second Meeting of USCIBEC. Please advise the Secretary if any 

changes are desired. 

2. In the event there is no objection to these minutes on the part 

of USCIBEC members by 14 J~ 1955 they will be considered approved. 

Enclosure 

1 cow of Tentative Minutes, 

Thirty-second Meeting of USCIBEC. 

USCIB: 5.3/101 

H: D ' JONF.S 

Active Executive Secretary, USCIB 

IIANBL!i Vil 60M:EN'! 01~8 ON:Ea¥ 

24 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 10-21-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a · 

COltlFtDE~'TIAL 
COMi'ml!iN'l'IM. • '0.6. B!SS ON:C! 

PRESENT 

DEFENSE: 

STATE: 

AIR FORCE: 

Q!!: 

SECRETARIAT: 

ALSO PRESENT: 

STATE: 

~: 

ARMY: 

-

!!!!'!= 

MINUTES OF THE THIRTY-SECOND MEETING 

OF THE 

USCIB EXECUTIVE CC»iITTEE 

Mr. H. D. Jones, Chairman 

Mr. Philip J. Patton 

(for Mr. William H. Godel) 

Mr. T. Achilles Polyzoides 

Mr. s. Drake Ellis 

Colonel John J. Davis, USA 

(for Captain Jack S. Holtwick, Jr., USN) 

Lt. Colonel Richard Leffers 

Commander Frederick E. Welden 

(f'or Commander William F. Bringle) 

Lt. Colonel Frank J. Harrold, Jr. 

Lt. Colonel Henry C. Simmons, USAF 

Mrs. Daphne O. Tucker 

Mr. Robert F. Packard 

Lt. Commander Paul J. Karl, Jr., USN 

Mr. Benson K. Buffham 

Major Arnie L. Millican 

Mr. John F. 0 1Gara 

Lt. Connnander Dora Davis 

C0 .. 

1

\'FIDENTIAL 

OGA 
00NPH>Eti'fI:Ail - U.S. Er!S OMLI 

AIR FORCE: Captain Allen T. Miller 

COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN: M.ajor William R. Culmer, USA (SECCOM) 

The Thirty-second Meeting of the United States Communications 

Intelligence Board Executive Committee was held at 1400 on 23 June 1955 

in Room 2E687,, National Defense Building, Washington, D.C. 

- 2 -

COl\'-FIDEP.lTIA L 
SUBJECT NUMBER 

USCIB: 5.3/100 

Subject: 

F\/J ~L­

!l!M'fA'fIYE 

Item 1 of the Agenda for the 32nd Meeting of USCim~, 

held on 2.3 June ~955. 

Approval ot Final Minutes ot the 29th Meeting. 

The CHAIIIUN (Mr. Jones) asked i! there were 8.?1f objections to th1;, 

subject minutes. 

There were no objections. 

DECISION: (23 June 1955) USCIBEC approved the final minutes o! the 21th 

meeting as written. 

USCIB: 5.3/100 - 3 -
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed October 3, 2018

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D18-1664

Lower Tribunal No. 16-25037

________________



### WD 19790, LLC

, Appellant,

vs.



### Dan Trust

, et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Thomas J.

Rebull

, Judge.

Stok Folk + Kon, and Robert A. Stok and Joshua R. Kon

, for appellant.

Kluger, Kaplan, Silverman, Katzen & Levine, P.L., and Abbey L. Kaplan

and Josh M. Rubens, for appellees.

Before EMAS, LOGUE, and LUCK, JJ.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

LOGUE, J.

The order dismissing Count VI of Appellant’s Second Amended

Counterclaim is not an appealable order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure9.110(k) as “a separate and distinct cause of action that is not interdependent with

other pleaded claims” because Count VI alleges abuse of process on the basis that

the Appellees’ Third Amended and Supplemental Complaint “is a sham and seeks

de minimis

, nominal and/or technical damages, if any, without a reasonable

prospect of success.” This allegation is intertwined with the litigation still pending

in the trial court concerning the legal and factual merits of that Complaint. See,

e.g.

, Bardakjy v. Empire Inv. Holdings, LLC

, 239 So. 3d 146, 147 (Fla. 3d DCA

2018). Accordingly, Appellees’ motion to dismiss is granted.

Appeal dismissed.

2
### UNITED STATES NAVY

- MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

J.A. FISCHER, T.H. CAMPBELL, D.A. NORKIN

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

SALIH E. FALKE

LOGISTICS SPECIALIST SEAMAN ( E

- 3), U.S. NAVY

NMC CA 201500393

SPECIAL COURT

- MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 14 October 2015

. Military Judge: CAPT David M. Harrison, JAGC, USN

. Convening Authority: Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Japan,

Yokosuka, Japan

. Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: CDR T.D. Stone,

JA GC, USN

. For Appellant: Maj Emmett Collazo, USMCR.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller , Esq.

29 February 2016

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT

---------------------------------------------------

After caref ul consideration of the record, submitted

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 ACTION: Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                        ) may be relied upon as “of record” notice that the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the identification of any institutions which have been placed in liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at 
                        *www.fdic.gov/​bank/​individual/​failed/​banklist.html*
                         or contact the Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center. Dated: February 18, 2015. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Pamela Johnson, Regulatory Editing Specialist.
 
 
 Institutions In Liquidation
(In alphabetical order)
FDIC ref. No.
Bank name
City
State
Date closed10512
Capitol City Bank & Trust Company
Atlanta
GA
2/13/2015


[FR Doc. 2015-03735 Filed 2-23-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1056/2006

of 12 July 2006         

concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (1), and in particular Article 9(1)(a) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The goods described in column 1 of the table set out in the Annex shall be classified within the Combined Nomenclature under the CN codes indicated in column 2 of that table.

Article 2

Binding tariff information issued by the customs authorities of Member States, which is not in accordance with this Regulation, can continue to be invoked for a period of three months under Article 12(6) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 July 2006.

For the Commission

László KOVÁCS            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 996/2006 (OJ L 179, 1.7.2006, p. 26).

(2)OJ L 302, 19.10.1992, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No. 648/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 117, 4.5.2005, p. 13).

----

ANNEX

----