alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          45,044
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  406,060
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               477,450
<PP&E>                                       6,569,981
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,820,396)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,425,345
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,524,674
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,466
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,616,914
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,425,345
<SALES>                                        533,675
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               548,066
<CGS>                                          496,463
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  779,525
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,693
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,601
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (260,753)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (260,753)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (260,753)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)
        

</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

HomeHistoryCryptologic HistoryHistorical FiguresHistorical Figures View

# NSA Historical Figures

                Download            

# Barbara Clark

Barbara Clark served in the Pacific during WWII as a member of the Woman's Army Corps. She returned to federal service in early 1951 with the Armed Forces Security Agency as a Special Research Analyst doing research and reporting. As a Senior research analyst at NSA with foreign language capability, Mrs. Clark served in four different production elements dealing with a wide range of international issues.    

Although Mrs. Clark became a division chief in the Operations organization, she was best known throughout the Agency for her efforts to help others. She was heavily involved in NSA organizations that supported employees such as the International Affairs Institute, Women and Men in NSA, and the Phoenix Society. 

Mrs. Clark passed away in 2003 while still active at NSA. 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Barbara Clarkwomen in cryptologyhistorical figureBiography
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

In re: XIAOHUA HUANG,

Petitioner

______________________

2020-101

______________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States 

District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 

3:18-cv-06654-WHA, Judge William H. Alsup.

______________________

ON PETITION

______________________

Before NEWMAN, LOURIE, and CHEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

Xiaohua Huang petitions this court for a writ of mandamus seeking sanctions against Nephos Inc., reversal of

the district court’s order striking his infringement contentions, and issuance of a temporary restraining order and 

preliminary injunction against Nephos. 

Mr. Huang sued Nephos for patent infringement in the 

United States District Court for the Northern District of 

California. On July 9, 2019, the district court issued an 

order granting Nephos’ motion to strike Mr. Huang’s infringement contentions and allowing Mr. Huang to amend 

Case: 20-101 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 11/21/2019
2 IN RE: HUANG

and re-file his contentions. The district court also denied 

Mr. Huang’s motion for sanctions. On August 30, 2019, the 

district court issued an order denying Mr. Huang’s motion 

for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to prohibit Nephos from selling its networking chips 

within the United States. Mr. Huang appealed that order, 

which this court docketed as Appeal No. 2020-1019. That 

appeal is still pending. On November 12, 2019, the district 

court entered final judgment in his case.

Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, available only 

where the petitioner shows: (1) a clear and indisputable 

right to relief; (2) there are no adequate alternative legal 

channels through which he may obtain that relief; and (3) 

the grant of mandamus is appropriate under the circumstances. See Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Dist. of Columbia, 542 U.S. 367, 380–81 (2004). Mr. Huang has not 

shown entitlement to relief. Mr. Huang may directly appeal the district court’s denial of his request for sanctions 

and any interlocutory ruling now that the district court has 

entered a final judgment in the case. Mr. Huang can also 

raise his arguments concerning the denial of his request for 

preliminary injunctive relief in Appeal No. 2020-1019. He 

therefore clearly has alternative means to obtain relief. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

FOR THE COURT

 November 21, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court

s32

Case: 20-101 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 11/21/2019
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 (the "Report"),
I, Lance F. Bospflug, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



Petroleum Helicopters, Inc.


By: /s/ Lance F. Bospflug
    ----------------------------------------
      Lance F. Bospflug
      President and Chief Executive Officer
      November 14, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                       175
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,190
<ALLOWANCES>                                        11
<INVENTORY>                                      4,065
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,942
<PP&E>                                          10,852
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,066
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,475
<BONDS>                                          5,042
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,000
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,182)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,066
<SALES>                                          7,895
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,895
<CGS>                                            5,356
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   252
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 265
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (805)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (282)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (523)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (523)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
stid cyid year sector adjacee

NH3 39 13 2007 MOVES 52.82165969 Sector Ammonia NH3 39 13 2007 area 18.79321496 Point 54.06 NH3 39 13 2007 egu_point 0.239450515 Area 405.94 NH3 39 13 2007 marairrail 0.1385251 Non-road 0.37 NH3 39 13 2007 nh3 387.1461373 On-road 52.82 NH3 39 13 2007 nonegu_pt 53.82314063 Total 513.19 NH3 39 13 2007 nonroad 0.227451437 513.19 ROG 39 13 2007 area 863.8741581 ROG 39 13 2007 egu_point 0.252118343 ROG 39 13 2007 marairrail 6.415035031 ROG 39 13 2007 nonegu_pt 48.43168588 ROG 39 13 2007 nonroad 423.5947298 TOG 39 13 2007 MOVES 1376.694094 2,719.26 Emissions in tons per yearVOC

48.68 863.87 430.01 1,376.69 2,719.26
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1584 

To repeal the renewable fuel standard 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 16, 2015 

Mr. CASSIDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To repeal the renewable fuel standard 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Renewable Fuel Stand5 ard Repeal Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF RENEWABLE FUEL STANDARD. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 211 of the Clean Air Act 

8 (42 U.S.C. 7545) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (d)— 

10 (A) in paragraphs (1) and (2), by striking 

11 ‘‘(n), or (o)’’ each place it appears and insert12 ing ‘‘or (n)’’; and 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1584 IS

1 (B) in paragraph (1), in the second sen2 tence, by striking ‘‘(m), or (o)’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘or (m)’’; 

4 (2) by striking subsection (o); and 

5 (3) by redesignating subsections (q) through (v) 

6 as subsections (o) through (t), respectively. 

7 (b) ADDITIONAL REPEAL.—Section 204 of the En8 ergy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 

9 7545 note; Public Law 110–140) is repealed. 

10 (c) REGULATIONS.—Effective beginning on the date 

11 of enactment of this Act, the regulations contained in sub12 parts K and M of part 80 of title 40, Code of Federal 

13 Regulations (as in effect on that date of enactment), shall 

14 have no force or effect. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Benton, Humphreys and Senior Judge Overton 

BAYSHORE ROOFING, INC. AND 

 COMMONWEALTH CONTRACTORS GROUP 

 SELF-INSURANCE ASSOCIATION 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 1539-05-1 PER CURIAM 

 OCTOBER 11, 2005 

RICHARD D. BELCHER 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (William C. Walker; Audrey Marcello; Taylor & Walker, P.C., on 

brief), for appellants. 

 (Judd B. Mendelson; Steingold & Mendelson, on brief), for appellee. 

 Bayshore Roofing, Inc. and its insurer appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation 

Commission ruling that Richard D. Belcher proved he sustained an injury by accident arising out 

of his employment on September 29, 2003. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s 

opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the commission’s 

decision for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Belcher v. Bayshore 

Roofing, Inc. et.al., VWC File No. 215-94-99 (June 13, 2005). We dispense with oral argument 

and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code 

§ 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

Affirmed.

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
99-1226.

#### State v. Booth.

Franklin App. No. 98AP-944. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Torry Parker, Appellant.

[772 NYS2d 584]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered October 30, 2000, convicting him of murder in the first degree, robbery in the first degree, attempted *508robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, attempted robbery in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction of murder in the first degree because the People failed to prove that he caused the victim’s death is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not specifically raise this issue on his motion to dismiss *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]; *People v Bedford,*296 AD2d 553 [2002]; *People v Ruiz,*211 AD2d 829 [1995]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of murder in the first degree beyond a reasonable doubt *(see*Penal Law § 125.27 [1] [a] [vii]). There was sufficient evidence from which a rational trier of fact could have found that the defendant, with the intent to kill, shot the victim once, causing a wound which contributed to his death, during the course of, and in furtherance of, a robbery *(see People v Cicchetti,*44 NY2d 803 [1978]; *People v Bracey,*41 NY2d 296, 303 [1977]). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]). Prudenti, P.J., Altman, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of St. Joseph Capital Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I, John
W. Rosenthal, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ John W. Rosenthal
John W. Rosenthal
Chief Executive Officer

March 29, 2004

                                       48
JOSE LEAL,

Petitioner,

v.

DIVISION OF 

ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS, 

OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF 

COMPENSATION CLAIMS,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-0996

Opinion filed May 5, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Jose Leal, Pro se, Petitioner.

Stephanie R. Hayes of Office of the Judge of Compensation Claims, Tallahassee, 

for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.

B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
20 February 1956

DATE Requirements on AVEO

WP (Col Jacobsen)

: i e ua
33 it g
i ‘if - i

uk i a

RICHARD K. JAQONSOH
Cniet,

Test Group

q

L- 179A-S br

DO.
INTERVALS; Nui.

OECLASSIFIED. Lots”
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1620 

To reduce duplication of information technology at the Department of 

Homeland Security, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 18, 2015 

Mr. JOHNSON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To reduce duplication of information technology at the 

Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘DHS IT Duplication 

5 Reduction Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DHS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DUPLICATION 

7 REDUCTION. 

8 (a) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DUPLICATION RE9 DUCTION.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the 

10 enactment of this Act, the Chief Information Officer of 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1620 IS

1 the Department of Homeland Security shall submit to the 

2 Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Rep3 resentatives and the Committee on Homeland Security 

4 and Governmental Affairs of the Senate a report that in5 cludes the following: 

6 (1) The number of information technology sys7 tems at the Department of Homeland Security. 

8 (2) An assessment of the number of such sys9 tems exhibiting duplication or fragmentation. 

10 (3) A strategy for reducing such duplicative 

11 systems, including an assessment of potential cost 

12 savings or cost avoidance as a result of such reduc13 tion. 

14 (4) A methodology for determining which sys15 tem should be eliminated when there is duplication 

16 or fragmentation. 

17 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

18 (1) DUPLICATION OR FRAGMENTATION.—The 

19 term ‘‘duplication or fragmentation’’, in reference to 

20 information technology systems, means 2 or more 

21 systems or programs that deliver similar 

22 functionality to similar user populations. 

23 (2) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY.—The term 

24 ‘‘information technology’’ has the meaning given 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1620 IS

1 such term in section 11101 of title 40, United 

2 States Code. 

3 (c) NO NEW AUTHORIZATION OF FUNDING.—This 

4 section shall be carried out using amounts otherwise ap5 propriated or made available to the Department of Home6 land Security. No additional funds are authorized to be 

7 appropriated to carry out this section. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 13





CERTIFICATION





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF


TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)








Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., a company organized under the laws of the State of Israel (the “Company”), does hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: March 29, 2010
By:  /s/ Gil ShwedGil ShwedChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the BoardBy:  /s/ Tal PayneTal PayneChief Financial Officer
The Honorable Rodney S. Webb, Chief Judge, United States District Court for 1 the District of North Dakota, adopting the report and recommendations of th e Hon orable Karen K. Klein, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of North Dakota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-1071

___________ Philomene E. Johnson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of North Dakota. Kenneth S. Apfel, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: October 7, 1998 Filed: November 2, 1998

___________ Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. PhilomeneE. Johnson appeals the district court & s grant of summary judgment 1 affirm ingthe Social Security Commissioner & s decision to deny her application fo r supplemental security income . Having reviewed the record and the parties & briefs, we-2-

concl ude that no error of law or fact appears and that an opinion would lac k precedential value. We affirm the district court & s judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 23.1

                          Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
Optimal Robotics Corp.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-65530) on Form S-8 of Optimal Robotics Corp. of our report dated February
20, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Optimal Robotics Corp.
as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, deficit and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003
annual report on Form 10-K of Optimal Robotics Corp.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Chartered Accountants

March 5, 2004
Montreal, Canada