# Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Latitude: 21 o 

# 22’15” N Longitude: 157 o 

# 53’33” W
DOH Facility ID No. 9-102271 DOH Release ID No. 99051, 010011, 020028
September 2008

Prepared by:

TEC Inc. 1001 Bishop St. Suite 1400 American Savings Bank Tower Honolulu, Hawaii 96813

Prepared for:

Commander Navy Region Hawaii Environmental Department, Code N45 850 Ticonderoga Street, Suite 110 Pearl Harbor, Hawaii 96860-5101

### Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008



## i 

# Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. ..... ES-1 SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ ...... 1-1 1.1 P ROJECT 

## O BJECTIVE 

## ............................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 P REVIOUS 

## R EPORTS 

## ................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.3 B ACKGROUND 

## ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.3.1 Site Description ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3.2 Facility Information .................................................................................................. 1-2 1.3.3 UST Information ........................................................................................................ 1-2 1.4 D ESCRIPTION OF 

## P ROBLEM 

## ..................................................................................................... 1-2 1.5 P REVIOUS 

## E NVIRONMENTAL 

## I NVESTIGATIONS AT THE 

## F ACILITY 

## .......................................... 1-3 SECTION 2 REMOVAL ACTIO N ACTIVITIES ............................................................................... 2-1 2.1 J UNE 

## 10, 2008 A CTIVITIES 

## ...................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 J UNE 

## 17, 2008 A CTIVITIES 

## ...................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3 S AMPLE 

## C OLLECTION 

## ............................................................................................................. 2-2 2.4 S OIL 

## S AMPLE 

## A NALYSES 

## ........................................................................................................ 2-2 SECTION 3 SOIL SAMPLE RESULTS ............................................................................................... 3 -1 3.1 S AMPLE 

## A NALYTICAL 

## R ESULTS 

## ............................................................................................. 3-1 SECTION 4 ENVIRONMENTAL HA ZARD EVALUATION ........................................................... 4-1 SECTION 5 CONCLUSIONS A ND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................... 5-1 SECTION 6 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................... ......... 6-1



## List of Tables Table 3-1. Results for Composite Samples Comp ared to Environmental Action Levels ........... 3-2

List of Figures Figure 1-1. Regiona l Location Map ............................................................................................ 1-7 Figure 1-2. Area Wells and Aquifer Systems ............................................................................. 1-8 Figure 1-3. Fuel Storage Tanks a nd Water Tunnel Cross-Section ............................................. 1-9 Figure 1-4. Tank 17 Site Layout Map ....................................................................................... 1- 10 Figure 2-1. Composite Sa mple Locations ................................................................................... 2-3
List of Appendices Appendix A – Photo Documentation Appendix B – Laboratory Analytical Reports

### Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008



## ii List of Acronyms and Abbreviations μ g/m 3 

## micrograms per cubic meter μ g/kg micrograms per kilogram AFCEE Air Force Center for En gineering and the Environment bgs below ground surface BTEX benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes DOH State of Hawaii De partment of Health EALs Environmental Action Levels EHE Environmental Hazard Evaluation F-76 diesel marine fuel FISC Fleet Industr ial Supply Center HAR Hawaii Administrative Rules HRS Hawaii Revised Statutes JP-5 Jet Propulsion fuel 5 MDL method detection limit mgd million gallons per day mg/kg milligrams per kilogram mg/L milligrams per Liter mm millimeter MtBE methyl tert-butyl Ether PAHs polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons PHWS Pearl Harbor Water System PID photo-ionization detector ppmv parts per million by volume RL reporting limit SIM Selected Ion Monitoring SVMP soil vapor monitoring point TEC TEC Inc TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon TPH-GRO Total Petroleum Hydro carbons -Gasoline Range Organics TPH-DRO Total Petroleum Hydro carbons -Diesel Range Organics USEPA United States Envir onmental Protection Agency U.S. Navy United States Navy UST underground storage tank VOCs volatile organic compounds

### Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008

ES-1 

# EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Removal Action report is presented by the U.S. Navy to document activities conducted to mitigate an inadvertent release of fuel from ove rhead piping located in the lower access tunnel of the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility.
There are 18 active and 2 inactive, 12.5 million- gallon field-constructed underground storage tanks (USTs) located at the Red H ill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility (t he Facility). The active USTs contain middle distillate petrol eum fuels: Jet Propulsion fuel 5 (JP-5), JP-8 and F-76 (diesel marine fuel). The top of the USTs are locate d at least 100 feet below ground surface (bgs) and the bottoms are located at least 80 feet above the groundwater table. The aquifer underlying the Facility is categorized as a currently used, fr esh (chloride content belo w 250 milligrams per Liter [mg/L]) drinking water source that is irreplaceable and has a high vulnerability to contamination (Mink and Lau, 1990). The nearest production well is the United States Navy (U.S. Navy) Well 2254-01, located approximately 3,000 feet down-gradie nt from the Facility. The U.S Navy Well 2254-01 produces between 4 million gallons per day (mgd) and 10 mgd of potable water for the U.S. Navy’s Pearl Harbor Water System (PHWS). Previous environmental site investigations indi cated fuel releases have occurred that have impacted groundwater underlying the Facility. A risk assessment conducted by the U.S. Navy (TEC Inc., 2007) concluded that the USTs were below the bottom of the adjacent valleys, and past or future releases will not present a risk to above ground receptors, either due to direct exposure or soil vapor intrusion. In addition, the risk assessment used a three-dimensional groundwater model to estimate the minimum size of a release that would degrade the water produced by the U.S. Navy Well 2254-01. Assuming na tural degradation of the middle distillate fuel, it was estimated that a minimum release of 16,000 gallons would be required to impact the U.S. Navy Well 2254-01. On March 4, 2008, approximately four gallons of JP-5 fuel was released from overhead piping in the Facility lower access tunnel adjacent to Tank 17. The release landed on a pile of excavated soil covered with plastic sheeting, and migrated into an adjacent trench covered with plywood. Approximately two gallons were immediately removed from the ground surface using absorbent material leaving an estimated two gallons to seep into the bedrock in the plywood-covered trench.
In June, TEC Inc. (TEC) was contracted to conduct a limited rem oval action and site characterization investigation as part of the release response activity required by the Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS), Title 19, Chapter 342L and Hawaii Admini strative Rules (HAR), Title 11, Chapter 281, Subchapters 1 through 10. The open trench was manua lly excavated to approximately five feet below the tunnel floor through the consolidated basalt bedrock, until observed pore-space fluid and staining was dimini shed. Excavation was halted because further digging will require engineering controls to stabilize the ad jacent tunnel-wall bulkheads and additional removal of the concrete tunnel floor. Although petroleum-impacted rock remains in the trench walls and floor, all potentially mobile fuel was removed. Maximum headspace measurements from a field photoionization detect or (PID) at the extent of the excavation was 225 parts per million by volume (ppmv). Laboratory results from a composite sample of material collected at the extent of the excav ation showed Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)

### Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008

ES-2 

## as Gasoline Range Organics (TPH-GRO) at 110 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) and TPH as Diesel Range Organics (TPH-D RO) at 5,670 mg/kg, as well as detected concentrations of naphthalene, ethylbenzene and xylenes . Benzene was not detected.
An Environmental Hazard Evaluation (EHE) was conducted to assess the hazards associated with the petroleum-impacted material that remains in place. The risk drivers were evaluated as TPH-DRO and TPH-GRO. The State of Hawaii Department of Health (DOH) Environmental Action Levels (EALs) (DOH 2005 and 2006 updates) fo r soil contamination we re used to screen the EHE:

• The gross contamination (for staining and odor nuisance) EAL is 100 mg/kg.
o The results of the final sample exceed this EAL for impacted bedrock located below the concrete floor of the lowe r access tunnel of the Facility.
o The location of the impacted ma terial is a secure facility.
o Excavation in this area is not expected in the future, nor will this impacted material be used for backfill in the future since it is consolidated bedrock, and very difficult to excavate.
o The Facility is strictly regulated for combustion sources to mitigate a potential flammability concern.
o Gross contamination left in place is not considered a significant environmental hazard for the reasons described above.

• EALs associated with terrestrial receptors are site-specific, depe nding on the type and availability of receptors to the chemicals of concern.
o The pathway to terrestrial receptors is incomplete since the impacted material is greater than 300 feet bgs a nd located beneath the concrete floor of the lower access tunnel in a secure facility, nor w ill this impacted material be used for backfill in the future since it is consolidated bedrock, and very difficult to excavate.
o Impact to terrestrial recept ors is not considered a significant environmental hazard for the reasons described above.

• Soil gas (for potential impact to indoor air) EAL for commercial/industrial receptors is 140,000 μ g/m 3 

## (micrograms per cubic meter), or approximately 20 ppmv for middle distillate fuels;
o The maximum headspace reading at the bottom of the trench excavation was 225 ppmv, which exceeded the soil gas EAL by a factor of 11.
o However, the EAL assumes commercial/i ndustrial exposure factors including:

 Exposure duration of 25 years;

 Exposure frequency of 250 days per year.
o Actual exposure to the limited release at Tank 17 is expected to be much less:

 Exposure duration of 10 years;

 Exposure frequency of 1 day per year;

 Actual estimated exposure is probably 600 times less than the commercial/industrial exposure factors, t hus the site spec ific action level is 12,500 ppmv, or 55 times more than the concentrations observed.
o The Facility has a ventila tion system designed to comp letely replenish the indoor air with ambient outdoor air from gr ound surface on the Red Hill ridgeline to

### Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008

ES-3 

## ensure safe indoor air quality during activities associated with open UST manways, and other pote ntial exposure events.

o Soil gas intrusion to indoor air from the impacted materi al remaining in place is not considered a significant environmental hazard for the reasons described above.

• Soil leaching (potential for contaminants in soil to migrate in infiltrating groundwater to the groundwater table) EAL for TPH-DRO is 5,000 mg/kg and for TPH-GRO is 2,000 mg/kg.
o The composite sample results from the excavation extents exceeded the EAL for TPH-DRO (5,670 mg/kg) and was less than the EAL for TPH-GRO (110 mg/kg).
o The risk assessment associated with th e 2007 site investigation report (TEC, 2007) indicated that leachate was not a si gnificant driver for impacting the down gradient U.S. Navy Well 2254-01. A si gnificant liquid fuel on groundwater was necessary to impact the drinki ng water quality in this well.
o The location of the remaini ng impacted soil is under th e concrete floor of the Facility, and will not encounter si gnificant infiltrating groundwater.
o Leaching of contaminants from impacted material left in place to infiltrating groundwater is not considered a significant environmen tal hazard for the reasons described above.

It is recommended that the trench excavation be back-filled using the following procedure. 1. Place low-permeable clay material to approxima tely one foot below the floor surface. This will greatly reduce the migration pathwa y of water through the impacted material, and will likewise reduce the soil vapor migration pathway to floor surface. 2. Place compaction gravel from the surface of the low-permeable clay to 6 inches from the ground surface. This material should be co mpacted to limit settling of the fill material over time that could destabilize th e concrete floor of the tunnel. 3. Finish installing the soil vapor monitoring point (SVMP) surface completions for the newly installed SVMPs. 4. Complete the upper six inches with hardened concrete, finished to floor surface.

### Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008

ES-4 

## This page is inten tionally left blank.

### Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008



## 1-1 

# Section 1 INTRODUCTION

This Removal Action Report is prepared by TEC Inc. (TEC) for the Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environment (AFCEE) in support of the United States Navy (U.S. Navy), Fleet Industrial Supply Center (FISC), Pear l Harbor, Hawaii under contract F41624-03-D-8618- 0021. 1.1 P ROJECT 

## O BJECTIVE 

## The objectives of th is report are to: 1. Describe the activities associated with the inadvertent release of approximately four gallons of Jet Propulsion fuel 5 (JP-5) on March 4, 2008 in the lowe r access tunnel of the Facility, adjacent to Tank 17; 2. Describe the removal action and site character ization activities that were performed in June 2008 to mitigate the re lease to the subsurface; 3. Present the results of the release response removal acti on and confirmation sampling event; 4. Provide an Environmental Hazard Evaluation (E HE) to assess the haza rds associated with the petroleum contaminated rock that remains in place in accordance with Long-Term Management of Petroleum-Cont aminated Soil and Groundwater , June 2007. 1.2 P REVIOUS 

## R EPORTS 

## The following environmental reports previously su bmitted to the State of Hawaii Department of Health (DOH) are pertinent to this removal action report: 1. TEC Inc. 2007. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facili ty, Final Technical Report, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii . August. 2. TEC Inc. 2008. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Fac ility, Final Groundwater Protection Plan, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. January. 1.3 B ACKGROUND 

## 1.3.1 Site Description The Facility is located northeast of Pearl Harbor, between Halawa Valley and Moanalua Valley on the island of Oahu, Hawaii. Fi gure 1-1 presents the regional location map of the Facility. The Facility is located on the boundary between the Moanalua Aqui fer system, which is part of the Honolulu Aquifer sector, and th e Waimalu Aquifer system, which is part of the Pearl Harbor Aquifer sector. Both the Moanalua Aquifer a nd Waimalu Aquifer systems are classified by Mink and Lau as unconfined, basal and flank. Their status is listed as a currently used, fresh (chloride content below 250 milligrams per Liter [mg/L]) drinking water source that is irreplaceable and has a high vulnerability to contamination (Mink and Lau, 1990). Figure 1-2 illustrates the Facility with resp ect to area wells and aquifers. The Navy Public Works Department operates a pot able water infiltratio n tunnel approximately 1,550 feet hydraulically downgradient from the F acility (Dawson, 2006). The U.S. Navy Well 2254-01 is located approximately 3 ,000 feet downgradient (west) of the F acility and provides

### Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008



## 1-2 

## approximately 24% of the potable water to th e Pearl Harbor Water System, which serves approximately 52,200 military consumers (TEC, 2008). Figure 1-3 illustrates the location of the Facility with respect to the U.S. Navy Well 2254-01 and its infiltration gallery. According to the Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH) Criteria Working Group Series, Volume 2 (TCWG, 1998), JP-5 contains a pproximately 6.8% aromatic hydrocar bons, less than 1% benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylen es (BTEX), and less than 0.02% be nzene; and diesel-based fuels contain even less aromatic hydrocarbons. In add ition, diesels and JP fuels do not contain lead or methyl tert-butyl Ether (MtBE). An important mechanism is the solubility limit of a fuel at standard temperature and pressure, which is the highest concentration of petroleum hydrocarbons one can expect to dissolve in water. The solu bility limit for JP-5 is approximately 4.5 mg/L. The solubility limit for benzene in JP-5 is 0.75 mg /L. These concentrations will only be reached if these fuels are in direct c ontact and at equilibrium with the groundwater table. The lower dissolved concentration resulting from JP-5 allows the fuel to be degraded by natural attenuation mechanisms, such as by the metabolism of natural microbes in the groundwater. 1.3.2 Facility Information The Facility consists of 18 active and 2 inactiv e underground storage tanks (USTs) operated by FISC, Pearl Harbor. Each UST has a capac ity of approximately 12.5 million gallons, and currently contain JP-5, JP-8, and F-76 (diesel marine fuel). All fuels currently contained in the Facility are middle distillates, thus are not highly volatile or hi ghly mobile in groundwater. The Facility is located approximately 100 feet above the basal aquifer (Dawson, 2006). 1.3.3 UST Information The USTs were constructed in th e early 1940s. The tanks were c onstructed of steel and currently contain JP-5, JP-8 and F-76. Previously, seve ral tanks stored Navy Special Fuel Oil, Navy Distillate, aviation gasoline, and motor gasoline. Each tank measures ap proximately 245 feet in height and 100 feet in diameter. The upper dome s of the tanks lie at depths varying between approximately 100 feet and 200 feet below the ex isting ground surface (TEC, 2006) (Figure 1-3). 1.4 D ESCRIPTION OF 

## P ROBLEM 

## On March 4, 2008, the sample line to the bottom of Tank 17 in the lower access tunnel leaked JP-5 fuel. The leak was associated with the repair of this sample pipeline. The sample line that was responsible for the leak had trapped JP-5 that was inadvertently released. Once the sample line was cleared, no more JP-5 fuel was rel eased. The duration of the JP-5 release was approximately 20 seconds resulting in an esti mated three to four ga llons spilled onto an excavated pile of soil and rubble that had been c overed with plastic sheeting. The fuel migrated off the sheeting, onto the concrete floor of the tunnel and into an open trench that was being prepared for soil vapor monitoring points (SVMPs ) associated with Tank 17. The bottom of the trench contained both consolid ated and unconsolidated bedroc k. FISC site personnel (Ryan Gilla and Neal Horimoto) init iated immediate spill response measures that included the placement of absorbent pads on the floor and surr ounding soil/rock to recover as much JP-5 as possible. The estimated quantity of JP-5 recove red by the absorbent pads was one to two gallons while the remainder of the fuel most likely infiltrated into the adjacent trench. Initial spill response actions by FISC personnel did not include removal of liquid or contaminated soil other than what was removed in the absorbent material . Figure 1-4 shows th e Tank 17 site layout and features.

### Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008



## 1-3 

## Following the immediate measures conducted by FI SC, the excavated debr is pile and trench were covered while FISC prepared contracts to address the contaminated material that remained following the March 4, 2008 events. 1.5 P REVIOUS 

## E NVIRONMENTAL 

## I NVESTIGATIONS AT THE 

## F ACILITY 

## 1998 to 2001: From 1998 to 2001, the Navy conducted an i nvestigation at the Facility to assess potential releases from the fuel storage USTs and piping systems. In February 2001, the Navy installed a one-inch diameter sentinel well RHMW01 (previously known as MW-V1D) to monitor for contamination of the basal aquifer underlying the Facility. The well was installed and completed at approximately 100 feet below grade within the underground access tunnel. At the time of well completion, depth to water in RHMW01 was measured at 86 feet below grade (Dawson, 2006). In February 2001, groundwater samples collecte d from sentinel well RHMW01 contained TPH concentrations ranging from 0.883 mg/L to 1.0 5 mg/L and total lead ranging from 0.0104 mg/L to 0.015 mg/L. The maximum total lead concentra tion in the samples was equal to the primary drinking water standard of 0.015 mg/L for lead and exceeded the DOH Tier 1 groundwater action level of 0.0056 mg/L (Dawson, 2006). 2005 – Groundwater Sampling: The Navy began quarterly groundwater sampling at existing monitoring wells in 2005. Da wson Group, Inc. collected groundw ater samples from RHMW01 and the Red Hill Navy Pump Station (U.S. Navy Well 2254-01) in February, June, September, and December 2005. Samples collected in February and June 2005 were not filtered in the field prior to analysis for lead. Analytical results for samples collected from RHMW01 indicated concentrations of total lead were above the DOH Tier 1 action level of 0.0056 mg/L. The results were not considered appropriate for risk assessment si nce the sample had not been filte red. In addition, lead was not a component of fuels from the tanks near RHMW01. Lead may have been part of the Facility construction material (TEC, 2007). Samples were filtered in September and Decembe r 2005, and dissolved lead concentrations were below the DOH Tier 1 action level. Concentrations of all othe r contaminants of potential concern were below DOH Tier 1 action levels. 2005 – Site Investigation: As part of a site investigatio n, TEC installed three groundwater monitoring wells at the Facility between June and September 2005. Well RHMW02 was installed in the lower access tunnel near Tanks 5 and 6. Well RHMW03 was installed in the lower access tunnel near Tanks 13 and 14. Well RHMW04 was installed hydraulically upgradient of the USTs to provide geochemist ry for water moving through the basal aquifer beneath the Facility. Wells RHMW02 and RHMW03 were completed to depths of approximately 125 feet below the tunnel floor, and well RHMW04 was completed to a depth of approximately 300 feet below ground surface (bgs ) outside the tunnel. Groundwater samples were collected from the three newly installed wells and two existing wells (RHMW01 and U.S. Navy Well 2254-01) in September 2005.

### Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008



## 1-4 

## Naphthalene and trichloroethylene were dete cted in samples collected from RHMW02 at concentrations greater than the DOH Tier 1 acti on levels. Lead was detected in the sample collected from RHMW01 at a concentration grea ter than the DOH Tier 1 action level; however, the sample was not filtered in the field prior to analysis. Analytical results for filtered samples obtained by Dawson during the same period indicat ed concentrations of dissolved lead were below the DOH Tier 1 action level. 2006 – Site Investigation: Dedicated sampling pumps were in stalled in five wells (RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW04, and U.S. Navy Well 2254-01). TEC collected groundwater samples from the wells in July 2006. The gr oundwater samples were analyzed for petroleum constituents. Naphthalene was detected in sa mples collected from RHMW02 at concentrations above the DOH Tier 1 action level. In September 2005, with concurrence from the DOH, the Navy decided to use the newer DOH Environmental Action Levels (EALs) for the Red Hill Site Investigation and Risk Assessment project. The EALs are current and provide action levels for more chemicals, and are much more useful for conducting screening risk assessments. Since the DOH June 2005 Policy Letter stated that the two sets of action leve ls should not be mixed, the Tier 1 screening levels presented in HAR Section 11-281-78 would no longer be used to evaluate environmental impact at the Facility. 2006 – Groundwater Sampling: Groundwater samples were collected in December 2006. Analytical results indicated the following:

• No chemicals were detected in groundwat er from U.S. Navy Well 2254-01 or RHMW03;

• TPH as diesel range organics (TPH-DRO) was detected in groundw ater above the DOH Drinking Water EALs in RHMW01; and

• TPH as gasoline range organics (TPH-GRO), TPH-DRO, and naphthale ne were detected in groundwater above the DOH Drinking Water EALs in RHMW02. 2007 – Groundwater Sampling: Groundwater samples were co llected in March, June, and September 2007. Analytical resu lts indicated the following:

• No chemicals were detected above DOH Dr inking Water EALs at U.S. Navy Well 2254- 01;

• TPH-DRO exceeded DOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW01 during all three sampling events;

• TPH-GRO exceeded DOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW02 in March;

• TPH-DRO and naphthalene ex ceeded DOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW02 during all three sampling events;

• 1-methylnaphthalene and 2-methylnaphtha lene exceeded DOH Dri nking Water EAL for taste and odor at RHMW02 during all three sampling events; and

• TPH-DRO exceeded DOH Drinking Wate r EALs at RHMW03 in June. 2008 – Groundwater Sampling: Groundwater samples were coll ected in January, April and July 2008. Groundwater data for th e July events are not summarized here because they have not

### Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008



## 1-5 

## been fully validated at the date of this writing. Analytical results for January 2008 indicated the following:

• No chemicals were detected above DOH Dr inking Water EALs at U.S. Navy Well 2254- 01;

• TPH-DRO exceeded DOH Drinking Water EA Ls at RHMW0, but did not exceed the site-specific action level, which would require free product at this location;

• TPH-GRO did not exceed DOH Dri nking Water EALs at RHMW02;

• TPH-DRO and naphthalene exceeded DOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW02;

• 1-methylnaphthalene and 2-methylnaphtha lene exceeded DOH Dri nking Water EAL for taste and odor at RHMW02; and

• TPH-DRO exceeded DOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW03. Analytical results for Apr il 2008 indicated the following:

• No chemicals were detected above DOH Dr inking Water EALs at U.S. Navy Well 2254- 01;

• TPH-DRO exceeded DOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW01, but did not exceed the site-specific action level that would indicate free product at this location;

• TPH-GRO did not exceed DOH Dri nking Water EALs at RHMW02;

• TPH-DRO and naphthalene exceeded DOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW02 and concentrations measured for TPH-DRO (3,120 μ g/L and 3,020 μ g/L for the normal and duplicate sample, respectively) we re close to the solubility limit estimated for JP-5 (about 4,700 μ g/L);

• 1-methylnaphthalene and 2-methylnaphtha lene exceeded DOH Dri nking Water EAL for taste and odor at RHMW02; and

• TPH-DRO exceeded DOH Drinking Water EA Ls at RHMW03, but below the sitespecific action limits that would indicate free product.

### Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008



## 1-6 

## This page is inten tionally left blank.!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( S o u t h H a l a w a S t r e a m1234567891011121314151617181920RHMW03RHMW02RHMW01RHMW042254-012354-012253-03OWDFMW2OWDFMW1 2 4 0

2 8 0 3 2 0

3 6 0

2 0 0 4 0 0

1 6 0 4 4 0 5 6 0 4 8 0

5 2 0

1 2 0 7 2 0

6 0 0 6 4 0

68 0 7 6 0

8 0 0 8 4 0 6 0 0

6 4 0 4 4 0240 20 0

2 8 0

2 4 0

2 8 0

8 0 1 2 0 6 8 0

2 80

4 0 0 6 8 0

3 6 0 5 2 0

3 6 0

4 4 0 1 6 0480

3 2 0 5 6 0

6 0 0

3 2 0160

1 6 0280 4 4 0 7 2 0

2 0 0 2 0 0

4 8 0 4 0 0 1 6 0

1 2 0 6 4 0Figure1-1±

I :\P ro j e ct s \ Red Hi ll \ F i gure s\ Dra ft T e c h n i c a l Re p o r t \ F igure 1-2_ S i t e P l a n Map _ 4/16/2 0 0 7052,15260312.5Feet0530175Meters

S t re a m B o x C u l v e r tRegional Location MapHalawaCorrectionalFacilityHalawaIndustrialPark U S N a v y

R e d H i l l F u e l S t o r a g e F a c il i t yRed Hill Fuel Storage FacilityOahu,Hawaii[OAHU

H - 3 F r e e w a yRedHillOilyWasteDisposalFacilityBoundaryofRedHillNavalReservationNavyFiringRangeMoanaluaVillageU.S.NavyPumpingStationatRedHillHalawaShaftBOWSPumpStationCoastGuardReservation

N o rt h H a l a w a S t r e a m M o a n a l u a S t r e a mLegend140-footIntervalContourLineStreamRoadRedHillUSTIDNumberRedHillNavyInstallationBoundaryRedHillTunnelsHalawaCorrectionalFacilityBoundary2254-01Infiltration GalleryUnpavedRoadParcelCoastGuardReservation!20!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!§ ̈¦H 3 M o a nal

u a F

wyHalawa Shaft(2354-01)

H a l a w a S t r e a m N o r t h H a l a w a S t r e a m M o a n a l u a S t r e a m

So u th H a la wa Str ea m S o u t h H a l a w a S t r e a m2255-392255-372255-382253-032253-012253-022153-092154-012155-042254-02U.S. Navy Well(2254-01)Moanalua Monitor(2153-05)2153-102153-042153-112153-072153-082153-12

Prin t ing D a te: Apr. 23, 200 7 , F i l e : I:\Pr o jects\ R ed H il l \ F igur e s\Dra f t T e chn i c a l R e port\ F igure 1
- 8 _Are a Wells a n d Aq u ifer S y stems.mxd±0 830 1,660415Feet0 470235Meters30201111(11111)Source Data:City & County of Honolulu,GIS base layersDLNR Board of Water Supply,2005 water supply well IDs30201116(12212)30104116(11113)30104111(11111)Figure 1-2Area Wells and Aquifer SystemsRed Hill Fuel Storage FacilityOahu, HawaiiLegendBWS Well UseMUNICIPALstreamaquiferidentification30202111(11111)aquifer boundaryIRRIGATION!!OBSERVATION!OTHER!SEALED!UNUSED!freewayroadTEC project well!Figure1-3FuelStorageTanksandWater Tunnel Cross Section

P r in t i ng Da t e : A p r . 16 , 2007 , I : \ P roje c t s \ Red Hill \ F i gu r e s \ D r a f t T ec hni c al Repor t \ F i gure 1-4_ F uel S t orage T an k s and W a t e r T unn e l C ross Sec t i on. m xdSCALE:HORIZ.1"=500'VERT.1"= 60'RedHillFuelStorageFacilityOahu,HawaiiPubDate:Feb1,2008;I:\Projects\9121_Red_Hill\figures\WP\Fig_A-1_work_area.mxd 

## I

- B e a m S t e e l P i l l a r

N o t t o S c a l e 

## Notes



## North Soil Pile South Soil Pile Tank 17 Trench 

# L o w e r A c c e s s T u n n e l Tank 18

Tank 17 Access Tunnel
Characterized as clean soil from other tanks

Excavation Area Relocated Pile (Removed as IDW) ± PetroleumImpacted Trench



## Figure 1-4 Tank 17 Excavation Site Layout Map R e d H i l l F u e l S t o r a g e F a c i l i t y O a h u , H a w a i i

### Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008



## 2-1 

# Section 2 REMOVAL ACTION ACTIVITIES

On June 10 and 17, 2008, TEC conducted removal act ion activities at the Tank 17 site. These activities included but are not limited to soil excavation, sampling and monitoring. Photodocumentation of the removal action activ ities are presented in Appendix A. 

# 2.1 J UNE 

## 10, 2008 A CTIVITIES 

## On June 10, 2008, TEC personnel assessed the ar ea and mobilized the equipment needed to perform a limited removal of contaminated bedrock resulting from approximately 2 gallons of JP-5 released to the subsurface trench. These included a pneumatic jackhammer with a two foot extension bit, shovels, two 55-gallon drums, health and safety equipment and sampling equipment. Sampling equipment included ppbPl us RAE photoionization detector (PID) field headspace measurements, and containers for impacted soil samples to be collected at the extents of the excavation. Headspace readings were taken from the excavated material pile adjacent to the trench at nine locations, and at two locations in the trench. The readi ngs were highest in the excavation nearest the bulkhead and in the southe rn portion of the previ ously excavated pile (visual staining). The headspace readings ranged from approximately 5 parts per million by volume (ppmv) to 81 ppmv, with background at approximately 5 ppmv. In general the readings from the north and south piles, excluding the hot spot, ranged from approximately 5 ppmv to greater than 25 ppmv. The soil in the north pile was determined to be suitable to use as backfill for the Tank 17 soil vapor sampling trench (see Figure 2-1).
The bulkhead side of the trench (north) was exca vated to approximately 1.5 feet below the initial starting depth (two feet below the concrete surf ace). PID readings by depth were as follows:

• Surface approximately 81 ppmv;

• 6 inches approximately 95 ppmv;

• 1foot approximately 109 ppmv; and

• 1.5 feet approximately 120 ppmv. At a depth of one foot below the original surf ace, petroleum (presumably JP-5) was observed to pool within the low points of the excavation. TEC personnel used a vacuum to remove the pooled fluid to the extent practical . Fluid increased with depth to a total depth of 1.5 feet below the original grade. The excavation was advanced by breaking fragments of the bedrock using the pneumatic jackhammer then removing the materi al with a shovel or by hand. The excavated material consisted of solid rock (basalt with very small vesicles less than 2 millimeters (mm) in diameter). During the use of the demolition hammer, strong fuel odor was coming from the trench and one breathing zone reading was appr oximately 25 ppmv. Work continued using fullfaced respirators. The trench was excavated to dimensions of approxima tely 2 feet long by 1.7 inches wide by 1.5 feet deep. Excavation ac tivities ceased once TEC personnel reached the depth where the demolition hammer was no longer effective.

### Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008



## 2-2 

## One composite sample (RHTK17-1) was collected for both trench characterization and soil/rock disposal from the bottom of the excavation at 1.5 feet below the original trench grade. Figure 2-1 indicates the location of the composited grab samples. The southern soil pile and excavated material were put into a drum for disposal follo wing receipt of laboratory analyses. The sample was analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOC s) by United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Method 8021; polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by USEPA method 8270 by Selected Ion Monitoring (SIM); a nd TPH-DRO and TPH-GR O by USEPA Method 8015 modified. In addition, flashpoint was analy zed for disposal purposes. The sample was collected in four fou r-ounce containers, cooled to specifi cations and shipped under chain-ofcustody to SGS Environmental Services, Alaska. Investigative-derived waste from June 10, 2008 even ts included one 55-gall lon drum of material excavated from the trench, and an additional 20 gallons of material from the stained soil stockpile. 2.2 J UNE 

## 17, 2008 A CTIVITIES 

## On June 17, 2008, TEC returned to the Tank 17 excav ation site with a 4-f oot extension to the pneumatic jack-hammer and advanced the excavati on to approximately 4 feet below the original trench grade (4.5 feet bgs). PID readings by depth were as follows:

• 3 feet below tunnel surface, 83.9 ppmv; and

• 4.5 feet below tunnel floor surface, 225 ppmv. Saturated bedrock was removed to about 4.5 feet below grade at which point a weathered low permeability saprolitic material was encountered. Sa prolite is weathered basalt that has the grain size of silty clay but maintains some of the te xture of the original basalt. Although headspace measurements remained elevated, pooled materi al was no longer evident. Excavation ceased because of the potential for destabilizing the bulkhead and tunnel walls without proper engineering controls. In total, approximately 11 cubic feet of bedrock was removed from beneath the Tank 17 trench. An additional composite sample (RHTK17-3) was collected from locations within the excavation shown in Figur e 2-1 (similar to RHTK 17-1, except deeper), containerized and shipped in a similar fash ion to SGS Environmental Services, Alaska. 2.3 S AMPLE 

## C OLLECTION 

## Samples were collected from four locations wi thin the trench illustrated in Figure 2-1 and composited into sample containers. Aliquots to be analyzed for TPH-GRO and BTEX by USEPA Method 8021 were placed in a 4-ounce contai ner with septa and covered with methanol for preservation. The aliquot for the remaini ng analyses (TPH-DRO, PAHs, and flashpoint) was placed in a second 4-ounce jar for preparation. Sa mple containers were labeled with the date, sample identification number, type of analysis, and sampler’s name. The containers were placed on ice in sample coolers and tr ansported under chain-of-cust ody procedures to the certified laboratory for analysis. 2.4 S OIL 

## S AMPLE 

## A NALYSES 

## Composite samples were analyzed by SGS Environm ental Services, Inc. in Anchorage, Alaska for TPH-DRO by EPA Method 8015B, TPH-GR O and VOCs by EPA Method 8021, PAHs by EPA Method 8270C SIM, and fl ashpoint for disposal.P u b D a t e : F e b 1 , 2 0 0 8 ; I : \ P r o j e c t s \ 91 2 1_ R e d_ H i l l \ f i g u r e s \ W P \ F i g _ A - 1 _ w o r k _ a r ea . m xdI-BeamSteelPillarNottoScaleNotesNorth Soil PileSouth Soil PileTank 17TrenchLowerAccessTunnelTank 18Tank 17AccessTunnelCharacterized asclean soil fromother tanksExcavation AreaRelocatedPile(Removed as IDW) ±PetroleumImpactedTrenchXXXXFigure 2-1Tank 17 Site Composite Sample LocationsRedHillFuelStorageFacilityOahu,HawaiiXTrench SampleLocation

### Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008



## 2-4 

## This page is inten tionally left blank.

### Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008



## 3-1 

# Section 3 SOIL SAMPLE RESULTS

This section provides a summary of analytical results from two composite samples collected from the excavation trench located adjacent to Tank 17 in the lower access tunnel of the Facility (Figure 2-1). Sample results ar e summarized in Table 3-1. Complete laboratory reports are included in Appendix B. 3.1 S AMPLE 

## A NALYTICAL 

## R ESULTS 

## Both composite samples were analyzed for TP H-DRO, TPH-GRO, VOCs, PAHs, and flashpoint. Data qualifier “J” indicates the result is be tween the method detection limit (MDL) and the reporting limit (RL) and considered an estimated value. RHTK17-1 was composited from four discrete samples at about 2 feet below the tunnel ground surface (1.5 feet below the original trench grade) . RHTK17-3 was composited from four discrete samples at about 4.5 feet below the tunnel ground surface (4 feet below the original trench grade).

TPH-DRO and TPH-GRO were m easured at 5,040 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) and 111 mg/kg at 2.5 feet bgs, respectively, compared to 5,670 mg/kg and 110 mg/ kg at 4.5 ft bgs. The EAL for leaching to groundwater for TPH-DRO ( 100 mg/kg) was exceeded in both samples. Though concentrations were similar in both samples, the lack of liquid product at the end of the excavation indicated that the limited remaining fuel would not be expected to migrate further. Leaching is expected to be insi gnificant since the material will be covered by the concrete floor of the lower access tunnel.

Benzene was not detected in either sample above the MDL of 6.95 micrograms per kilogram ( μ g/kg). Ethylbenzene and total xylenes were de tected at 5 feet bgs, and the total xylenes concentration (3,200 μ g/kg) exceeded the DOH EAL for leaching to groundwater (2,300 μ g/kg). The leaching pathway is expect ed to be insignificant.

Nine PAHs were detected at 2 feet bgs and six were detected at 4.5 feet bgs. Naphthalene (3.3 mg/kg), 1-methylnaphthalene (6.85 mg/kg) and 2-methylnaphthalene (7.29 mg/kg) were detected above the EALs for leaching (1.9 mg/kg, 0.24 mg /kg and 0.24 mg/kg, respectively). However, the EAL for 1-methylanphthalene and 2-methylnaphthalene is ba sed on toxicity to ecological receptors in surface water and th e exposure pathway to surface wate r is insignificant (TEC 2007). The human health toxicity EAL is approximate ly 100 times greater. In addition, the leaching pathway is expected to be insignificant. Th e EAL for soil vapor intrusion into residential buildings was exceeded for 1- methylanphthalene and 2-methyl naphthalene (2.6 mg/kg). It should be noted that the ambient air within the Faci lity is tested periodica lly to ensure conditions are appropriate for occupational use.Table 3-1. Results for Composite Samples Compared to Environmental Action LevelsTank 17 Removal ActionRed Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility1Environmental Action Levels2GrossContamination(Odors, etc.)Urban AreaEcotoxicityCriteriaLeaching &GroundwaterProtectionDirectExposureVapor IntrusionInto BuildingsDrinking WaterResourceResults Q Flag MDL RL Results Q Flag MDL RLTable F-2 Table K Table I-1 Table C-1bTable E-1Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons(mg/kg)Diesel Range Organics 5040 34.5 111 5670 35.7 115 5.0E+02 5.0E+02 (Use soil gas) 1.0E+02Gasoline Range Organics 111 868 4340 110 678 3390 1.0E+02 6.0E+02 (Use soil gas) 1.0E+02Volatile Organic Compounds(μg/kg)Benzene ND 6.95 21.7 ND 5.42 16.9 5.0E+05 2.5E+04 1.1E+03 5.3E+02 3.1E+02Toluene 296 26 86.8 ND 20.3 67.8 5.0E+05 9.3E+05 9.2E+05 3.4E+03Ethylbenzene 1270 26 86.8 90 20.3 67.8 5.0E+05 5.8E+03 1.6E+03 4.0E+03P & M -Xylene 2250 26 86.8 1950 20.3 67.8 4.4E+05 4.4E+05 2.5E+05 2.3E+03o-Xylene 49.2 J 26 86.8 1270 20.3 67.8 4.4E+05 4.4E+05 2.5E+05 2.3E+03Total Xylenes 2299.2 3220 4.4E+05 4.4E+05 2.5E+05 2.3E+03Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons(μg/kg)Acenaphthene ND 8.32 27.7 154 8.56 28.5 1.0E+06 6.3E+05 1.4E+05 2.0E+04Acenaphthylene ND 8.32 27.7 ND 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 3.2E+05 1.0E+05Anthracene ND 8.32 27.7 ND 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 4.0E+04 3.4E+06 5.3E+03 2.5E+03Benzo(a)Anthracene 14.8 J 8.32 27.7 ND 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 4.0E+04 1.5E+03 1.3E+04Benzo[a]pyrene16 8J8 3227 7ND8 5628 55 0E+054 0E+041 5E+027 6E+03Environmental Chemical Results2Human HealthChemicalsRHTK17-106/10/2008RHTK17-306/17/2008Page 1 of 1Benzo[a]pyrene16.8J8.3227.7ND8.5628.55.0E+054.0E+041.5E+027.6E+03Benzo[b]Fluoranthene ND 8.32 27.7 ND 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 1.5E+03 1.2E+04Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 15.9 J 8.32 27.7 ND 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 4.0E+04 4.6E+05 2.7E+04Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 8.32 27.7 ND 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 4.0E+04 1.5E+04 5.2E+04Chrysene ND 8.32 27.7 ND 8.56 28.5 1.0E+06 4.0E+04 1.5E+05 1.4E+04Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene ND 8.32 27.7 ND 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 1.5E+02 1.6E+04Fluoranthene ND 8.32 27.7 ND 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 4.0E+04 4.6E+05 4.7E+05Fluorene ND 8.32 27.7 156 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 4.4E+05 1.3E+05 4.6E+05Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene 18.6 J 8.32 27.7 ND 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 4.0E+04 1.5E+03 4.1E+04Naphthalene 2140 83.2 277 3300 171 571 5.0E+05 4.0E+04 3.0E+04 4.0E+03 1.9E+03Phenanthrene 22.9 J 8.32 27.7 23 J 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 4.0E+04 4.4E+05 1.8E+04Pyrene 8.63 J 8.32 27.7 ND 8.56 28.5 5.0E+05 3.4E+05 5.6E+04 5.6E+041-Methylnaphthalene 7890 166 555 6850 171 571 5.0E+05 1.1E+04 2.6E+03 2.4E+022-Methylnaphthalene 8050 166 555 7290 171 571 5.0E+05 1.1E+04 2.6E+03 2.4E+02Notes:mg/kgmilligrams per kilogramμg/kgmicrograms per killogramQ FlagData Quality FlagJResult is between the MDL and the RL and is estimatedMDLMethod Detection LimitRLReporting Limit1State of Hawaii Department of Health. 2005. Screening for Environmental Concerns at Sites with Contaminated Soil and Groundwater, Volume 1: Summary Tier 1 Lookup Tables. 2008 updates2Based on unrestricted current or future land use. Considered adequate for residential housing, schools, medical facilities, day-care centers, parks and other sensitive uses.5040 Environmental chemical result that exceeds one or more Tier 1 Environmental Action Level5.0E+02 Chemical-specific Tier 1 Environmentl Action Level exceededPage 1 of 1

### Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008



## 4-1 

# Section 4 ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD EVALUATION

This EHE is provided to assess the hazards associated with the JP-5 that remains in the subsurface from the limited release in the lowe r access tunnel at Tank 17 th at occurred on March 4, 2008. A previous investigation evaluated ri sk associated with releases of middle distillate fuels, such as JP-5, from the Facility (TEC 2007). The results of this investigation indicated the following items.

• Soil vapor intrusion from releases associated with the USTs was potentially a significant pathway to the lower access tunnel, but not to buildings at ground surface. The Facility is ventilated to mitigate petroleum vapors associ ated with activities in the tunnels, and is periodically evaluated by an industrial hygienist to ensu re that air qual ity within the tunnel is suitable for onsite workers.

• Although the bedrock beneath several of the US Ts was shown to have been impacted by past inadvertent releases from the Facility, there were no direct contact pathways to residential receptors or onsite workers due to the depth of the releases (greater than 300 feet underground).

• The bases of the USTs (where inadvertent releases would pool) ar e below the bottom of the adjacent valleys; therefore the seepage pathway to ground surface and the exposure pathway to terrestrial receptors are considered incomplete.

• Groundwater beneath the Facility has been impacted by past inadvertent releases of petroleum at concentrations greater than the EALs for some chemicals; however, assuming JP-5 as the middle distillate petrol eum mixture of concer n, a three-dimensional MODFLOW groundwater model with reactive transport module RT3D showed that maximum concentrations of leachate from JP-5 would not impact the down-gradient drinking water well (U.S . Navy Well 2254-01).

• Based on calculations using the model desc ribed above, a minimum release volume of 16,000 gallons was required to impact the U. S. Navy Well 2254-01assuming a JP-5 fuel. The gross contamination (for staining and odor nuisance) EAL for TPH-DRO and TPH-GRO is 100 mg/kg.

• The remaining concentrations exceed this EA L for impacted bedrock located below the concrete floor of the lower acce ss tunnel of the Facility.

• The location of the impacted ma terial is a secure facility.

• Excavation in this area is not expected in the future, nor will this impacted material be used for backfill in the future since it is consolidated bedrock, and very difficult to excavate.

• The Facility is strictly regulated for combustion sources to mitigate a potential flammability concern.

• Gross contamination left in place not consider ed a significant environmental hazard for the reasons described above.

### Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008



## 4-2 

## The EALs associated with terrestri al receptors is site-specific.

• The pathway to terrestrial receptors is incomp lete since the impacted material is greater than 300 feet bgs and located beneath the conc rete floor of the lower access tunnel in a secure facility, nor will this impacted material be used for backfill in the future since it is consolidated bedrock, and ve ry difficult to excavate.

• Impact to terrestrial receptor s is not considered a significan t environmental hazard for the reasons described above.
Soil gas (for potential impact to indoor air, commercia l/industrial) EAL is 140,000 μ g/m 3 

## , or approximately 20 ppmv for mi ddle distillate fuels.

• The maximum headspace reading at the botto m of the trench excavation was 225 ppmv, which exceeded the soil gas EAL by a factor of 11.

• However, the EAL assumes resident ial exposure factors including:
o Exposure duration of 25 years;
o Exposure frequency of 250 days per year.

• Actual exposure to the limited release at Tank 17 is expected to be much less:
o Exposure duration of 10 years;
o Exposure frequency of 1 day per year;
o Actual estimated exposure is probably 600 times less than the commercial/industrial exposure factors, thus the site specific action level is 12,500 ppmv, or 55 times more than the concentrations observed.

• The Facility has a ventilation system designed to completely replenis h the indoor air with ambient outdoor air from ground surface on the Re d Hill ridgeline to ensure safe indoor air quality during activities associated wi th open UST manways, and other potential exposure events.

• The Facility has periodic audits for air quality to ensure health and safety of onsite workers and visitors.

• Soil gas intrusion to indoor ai r from the impacted material remaining in place is not considered a significant environmental h azard for the reasons described above. Soil leaching (potential for contaminants in soil to migrate in infiltrating groundwater to the groundwater table) EAL for TPH-DRO is 5,000 mg/kg and for TPH-GRO is 2,000 mg/kg.

• The composite sample results from the ex cavation extents exceeded the EAL for TPHDRO (5,670 mg/kg) and was less than the EAL for TPH-GRO (110 mg/kg).

• The risk assessment associated with the 2007 site investigati on report (TEC, 2007) indicated that leachate was not a significant driver for impacting the down gradient U.S. Navy Well 2254-01. A significant liquid fuel on groundwater was necessary to impact the drinking water quality in this well.

• The location of the rema ining impacted soil is under the concrete floor of the Facility, and will not be experiencing signi ficant infiltrating groundwater.

• Leaching of contaminants from impacted materi al left in place to infiltrating groundwater is not considered a significan t environmental hazard for the reasons described above.

### Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008



## 5-1 

# Section 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the EHE presented in Section 4 of th is document, it is concluded that, although contaminants remain in place in the bedrock beneath the lower access tunnel floor following the removal actions of June 10 and June 17, 2008, the risk and hazards associated with these contaminants are insignificant. It is estimated th at less than one gallon of JP-5 remains in the subsurface from the three to four gall on release which occurred on March 4, 2008.

It is recommended that no further action be taken to remove or destroy the remaining JP-5 due to the insignificant risk and technical difficulty as sociated with additiona l excavation adjacent to the wall of the Tank 17 access tunne l. It is further recommended that the trench excavation be completed as follows: 1. Backfill with low-permeable clay material to approximately one foot below the floor surface. This will greatly reduce the migra tion pathway of water through the impacted material, and will likewise reduce the soil vapor migration pathway to floor surface. 2. Place compaction gravel from the surface of the low-permeable clay to 6 inches from the ground surface. This material should be compacted to limit settling of the fill material over time that could destabilize th e concrete floor of the tunnel. 3. Finish the SVMP installation surface comp letion for the newly installed SVMPs. 4. Complete the upper six inches with harden ed concrete, finished to floor surface.

### Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008



## 5-2 

## This page is inten tionally left blank.

### Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008



## 6-1 

# Section 6 REFERENCES

Dawson Group, Inc. 2006. Fourth Quarter 2005 Groundwater Sampling Report, Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility, Hawaii. February.
Hawaii Administrative Rules, Titl e 11, Chapter 281, Subchapter 7. Mink, John F. and Lau, Stephen L., 1990. Aquifer Identification and Classification for O’ahu: Ground-Water Protection Strategy for Hawaii , Water Resources Research Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, February 1990, Revised. State of Hawaii Departme nt of Health. 2007. Long-Term Management of PetroleumContaminated Soil and Groundwater. June. State of Hawaii Department of Health. 2005a, 2008 updates. Screening for Environmental Concerns at Sites with Contaminated Soil and Groundwater, Volume 1: Summary Tier 1 Lookup Tables. Summer 2008. State of Hawaii Department of Health. 2005b. Use of May 2005 Environmental Action Levels (“EALs”) at Leaking Underg round Storage Tank Sites . Memo. 15 July. TPH Criteria Working Group (TCWG), 1998. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Criteria Working Group Series, Volume 2, Composition of Petroleum Mixtures , May. The Environmental Company, Inc. and AMEC Earth & Environmental, Inc. 2005. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility Work Plan, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. June.

TEC Inc. 2006. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Final – Addendum Planning Documents, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. May.

TEC Inc. 2007. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Final Technical Report, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii . August.

TEC Inc. 2008. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Final Groundwater Protection Plan, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. January.

### Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008



## 6-2 

## This page is inten tionally left blank.

### Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008



# Appendix A Photo-documentation

## Photo 1 Locations of PID measurements from the soil stockpile that was under the release. The stockpile was mostly covered in plastic. Tank 17 Excavation June 10, 2008

Photo 2 Impacted bedrock in trench before excavation. Tank 17 Excavation June 10, 2008

## Photo 3 Excavation extents adjacent to Tank 17 bulkhead (5 ft below surface) Tank 17 Excavation June 17, 2008

Photo 4 Excavation extents adjacent to Tank 17 bulkhead (Close-up). Tank 17 Excavation June 17, 2008

### Tank 17 Removal Action Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2008



# Appendix B Laboratory Analytical Reports

## SGS Work Order:

Contents:
Cover Page Case Narrative Final Report Pages Quality Control Summary Forms Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt Forms 

## Project: Client: 

# SGS Environmental Services Alaska Division Level II Laboratory Data Report

Released by:

Note: Unless otherwise noted, all quality assurance/quality control criteria is in compliance with the standards set forth by the proper regulatory authority, the SGS Quality Assurance Program Plan, and the National Environmental Accreditation Conference. 

## 9121 Red Hill BFSF The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 1082739

## CASE NARRATIVE Print Date: 7/21/2008

Workorder No.: 1082739 Project Name: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Client Name: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

Lab Sample ID 

## Sample Comments

Sample Type Client Sample ID Refer to the sample receipt form for information on sample condition.

1082739001 AK101/8021B - BFB (surrogate) recovery does not meet QC goals (biased high) due to hydrocarbon interference.

8015C - This sample was extracted one day outside of holding time. 8015C DRO - The pattern is consistent with a weathered middle distillate. 8015C - DRO MB result is greater than one-half the PQL, but less than PQL. 8270D SIMS - LCS recovery for fluoranthene and chrysene does not meet QC criteria (biased low). The reported results may be biased low in the associated samples. PS RHTK17-1

837229 8270D SIMS - LCS recovery for fluoranthene and chrysene does not meet QC criteria (biased low). The reported results

may be biased low in the associated samples. LCS LCS for HBN 201830 [XXX/19540]

837230 8270D SIMS - LCS recovery for fluoranthene and chrysene does not meet QC criteria (biased low). The reported results

may be biased low in the associated samples. 8270D SIMS - MS/MSD did not meet QC criteria for several compounds (biased high). See LCS for control. MS 08-1576-G03(1082602003MS)

837231 8270D SIMS - LCS recovery for fluoranthene and chrysene does not meet QC criteria (biased low). The reported results

may be biased low in the associated samples. 8270D SIMS - MS/MSD did not meet QC criteria for several compounds (biased high). See LCS for control. MSD 08-1576-G03(1082602003MSD)

837477 AK101/8015C - MS recovery does not meet QC goals (biased high) due to hydrocarbon interference. The associated

LCS/LCSD meet all QC goals. MS RHTK17-1(1082739001MS)

837478 AK101/8015C - MSD recovery does not meet QC goals (biased high) due to hydrocarbon interference. The associated

LCS/LCSD meet all QC goals. MSD RHTK17-1(1082739001MSD)

837479 AK101/8015C - MS recovery does not meet QC goals (biased high) due to matrix interference. The associated LCS/LCSD

meet all QC goals. MS RHTK17-1(1082739001MS)

837480 AK101/8015C - MSD recovery does not meet QC goals (biased high) due to matrix interference. The associated LCS/LCSD

meet all QC goals. MSD RHTK17-1(1082739001MSD)

837656 8015C - DRO MB result is greater than one-half the PQL, but less than PQL.

MB MB for HBN 201919 [XXX/19550]

840742 8270D SIMS - CCV recovery for dibenzo[a,h]anthracene does not meet QC criteria (biased high). This analyte was not

detected above above the PQL in the associated samples. CCV CCV for HBN 202568 [XMS/4602]

841408 625 SIMS - CCV recovery for dibenzo[a,h]anthracene does not meet QC criteria (biased high). This analyte was not

detected above above the PQL in the associated samples. CCV CCV for HBN 202716 [XMS/4606]841410 625 SIMS - CCV recovery for dibenzo[a,h]anthracene does not meet QC criteria (biased high). This analyte was not detected above above the PQL in the associated samples. CCV CCV for HBN 202716 (XMS/4606)

842288 8270D SIMS - CCV recoveries do not meet QC criteria for indeno(1,2,3-c,d) pyrene and dibenzo(a,h)anthracene (biased

high). The analytes are not detected above the PQL in the associated samples. CCV CCV for HBN 202908 [XMS/4616]

842707 8270D SIMS - CCV recovery for dibenzo(a,h)anthracene does not meet QC criteria (biased high). The analyte does not read

above the PQL in the associated samples. CCV CCV for HBN 202984 [XMS/4621]

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage Alaska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5301 ww w. us. sgs.com M em ber of SG S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)

# Laboratory Analytical Report

Project: Client:

Workorder No.: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)



### 1082739

Certification:
I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, both technically and for completeness, other than the conditions noted on the sample data sheet(s) and/or the case narrative. This certification applies only to the tested parameters and the specific sample(s) received at the laboratory. 1001 Bishop Street Ste 1400 ASB Tower Honolulu, HI 96813
Attn: Jeff Hart T: (808)528-1445 F:(808)528-0768 jshart@tecinc.com

Barbara Hager Barbara.Hager@sgs.com Project Manager 

### 9121 Red Hill BFSF

If you have any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further assistance, please contact your SGS Project Manager.

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G roupEnclosed are the analytical results associated with this workorder.
As required by the state of Alaska and the USEPA, a formal Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program is maintained by SGS. A copy of our Quality Assurance Plan (QAP), which outlines this program is available at your request.
The laboratory certification numbers are AK971-05 (DW), UST-005 (CS) and AK00971 (Micro) for ADEC and 001992 for NELAP (RCRA methods: 1020A, 1311, 6010B, 7470A,7471A,9040B,9045C, 9056, 9060, 9065, 8015B, 8021B, 8081A/8082, 8260B, 8270C).
Except as specifically noted, all statements and data in this report are in conformance to the provisions set forth by the SGS QAP, the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program and, when applicable, other regulatory authorities.
If you have any questions regarding this report or if we can be of any assistance, please contact your SGS Project Manager at 907-562-2343.

The following descriptors may be found on your report which will serve to further qualify the data.

MDL Method Detection Limit PQL Practical Quantitation Limit (reporting limit). CL Control Limit U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected. F Indicates value that is greater than or equal to the MDL. J The quantitation is an estimation. ND Indicates the analyte is not detected B Indicates the analyte is found in a blank associated with the sample.

* The analyte has exceeded allowable regulatory or control limits. D The analyte concentration is the result of dilution. GT Greater Than LT Less Than Q QC parameter out of acceptance range. M A matrix effect was present. E The analyte result is above the calibrated range. R Rejected DF Analytical Dilution Factor JL The analyte was positively identified, but the quantitation is a low estimation. <Surr> Surrogate QC spiked standard <Surr/IS> Surrogate / Internal Standard QC spiked standard QC Quality Control QA Quality Assurance MB Method Blank LCS (D) Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate) MS(D) Matrix Spike (Duplicate) BMS(D) Site Specific Matrix Spike RPD Relative Percent Difference ICV Initial Calibration Verification CCV Continuous Calibration Verification MSA Method of Standard Addition Notes: Soil samples are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise specified Print Date: 7/21/2008

Notes: All DRO/RRO analysese are integrated per SOP.

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage Alaska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5301 ww w. us. sgs.com M em ber of SG S G roup

## SAMPLE SUMMARY Client Name: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Project Name: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Workorder No.: 1082739 

## Analytical Methods

Method Description Analytical Method 8270 PAH SIM Semi-Volatiles GC/MS 8270D SIMS DRO by 8015B (S) SW8015C GRO/BTEX (W) SW8015C GRO/BTEX (W) SW8021B Ignitability Seta Flash SW1020A Percent Solids SM2540G SM20 2540G Print Date: 7/21/2008



## Sample ID Cross Reference
Client Sample ID Lab Sample ID 1082739001 RHTK17-1
1082739002 RHTK17-2
1082739003 TB01

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage Alaska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5301 ww w. us. sgs.com M em ber of SG S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: 

### RHTK17-1 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time SGS Ref. #: 1082739001 Collection Date/Time: 06/10/08 14:05 Receipt Date/Time: 06/12/08 11:27 Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Soil/Solid (dry weight) Percent Solids: 89.2

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Oils Laboratory

MDL DF

Ignitability Seta Flash GT200 70.0 degrees F FHV4987 70.0 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: FHV4987 Analytical Method: SW1020A Analysis Date/Time: 06/26/08 13:10 Container ID:1082739001-B Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: FWY

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: 

### RHTK17-1 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time SGS Ref. #: 1082739001 Collection Date/Time: 06/10/08 14:05 Receipt Date/Time: 06/12/08 11:27 Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Soil/Solid (dry weight) Percent Solids: 89.2

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Fuels Department

MDL DF

Gasoline Range Organics 111000 4340 ug/Kg VFC9022 VXX18296 868 1 Benzene ND 21.7 ug/Kg VFC9022 VXX18296 6.95 1 Toluene 49.2 J 86.8 ug/Kg VFC9022 VXX18296 26.0 1 Ethylbenzene 296 86.8 ug/Kg VFC9022 VXX18296 26.0 1 o-Xylene 1270 86.8 ug/Kg VFC9022 VXX18296 26.0 1 P & M -Xylene 2250 86.8 ug/Kg VFC9022 VXX18296 26.0 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 644 60-120 % VFC9022 VXX18296 1 

### * 1,4-Difluorobenzene <surr> 90.2 85-110 % VFC9022 VXX18296 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 32.883 g Prep Extract Vol.: 28.55 mL Analytical Batch: VFC9022 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 06/24/08 12:18 Prep Batch: VXX18296 Prep Method: SW5035A Prep Date/Time: 06/10/08 14:05 Container ID:1082739001-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 32.883 g Prep Extract Vol.: 28.55 mL Analytical Batch: VFC9022 Analytical Method: SW8021B Analysis Date/Time: 06/24/08 12:18 Prep Batch: VXX18296 Prep Method: SW5035A Prep Date/Time: 06/10/08 14:05 Container ID:1082739001-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: 

### RHTK17-1 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time SGS Ref. #: 1082739001 Collection Date/Time: 06/10/08 14:05 Receipt Date/Time: 06/12/08 11:27 Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Soil/Solid (dry weight) Percent Solids: 89.2

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

MDL DF

Diesel Range Organics 5040 111 mg/Kg XFC8010 XXX19550 34.5 10 5a Androstane <surr> 74.3 50-150 % XFC8010 XXX19550 10

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 30.234 g Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XFC8010 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 06/26/08 14:44 Prep Batch: XXX19550 Prep Method: SW3550C Prep Date/Time: 06/25/08 11:00 Container ID:1082739001-B Dilution Factor: 10 Analyst: HKG

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: 

### RHTK17-1 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time SGS Ref. #: 1082739001 Collection Date/Time: 06/10/08 14:05 Receipt Date/Time: 06/12/08 11:27 Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Soil/Solid (dry weight) Percent Solids: 89.2

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

MDL DF

Acenaphthylene ND 27.7 ug/Kg XMS4606 XXX19540 8.32 5 Acenaphthene ND 27.7 ug/Kg XMS4606 XXX19540 8.32 5 Fluorene ND 27.7 ug/Kg XMS4606 XXX19540 8.32 5 Phenanthrene 22.9 J 27.7 ug/Kg XMS4606 XXX19540 8.32 5 Anthracene ND 27.7 ug/Kg XMS4606 XXX19540 8.32 5 Fluoranthene ND 27.7 ug/Kg XMS4606 XXX19540 8.32 5 Pyrene 8.63 J 27.7 ug/Kg XMS4606 XXX19540 8.32 5 Benzo(a)Anthracene 14.8 J 27.7 ug/Kg XMS4606 XXX19540 8.32 5 Chrysene ND 27.7 ug/Kg XMS4606 XXX19540 8.32 5 Benzo[b]Fluoranthene ND 27.7 ug/Kg XMS4606 XXX19540 8.32 5 Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 27.7 ug/Kg XMS4606 XXX19540 8.32 5 Benzo[a]pyrene 16.8 J 27.7 ug/Kg XMS4606 XXX19540 8.32 5 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene 18.6 J 27.7 ug/Kg XMS4606 XXX19540 8.32 5 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene ND 27.7 ug/Kg XMS4606 XXX19540 8.32 5 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 15.9 J 27.7 ug/Kg XMS4606 XXX19540 8.32 5 Naphthalene 2140 277 ug/Kg XMS4616 XXX19540 83.2 50 1-Methylnaphthalene 7890 555 ug/Kg XMS4621 XXX19540 166 100 2-Methylnaphthalene 8050 555 ug/Kg XMS4621 XXX19540 166 100 Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 51.3 30-125 % XMS4606 XXX19540 5

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 22.734 g Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XMS4606 Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS Analysis Date/Time: 07/09/08 11:26 Prep Batch: XXX19540 Prep Method: SW3550C Prep Date/Time: 06/23/08 13:30 Container ID:1082739001-B Dilution Factor: 5 Analyst: JDH Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 22.734 g Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XMS4616 Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS Analysis Date/Time: 07/17/08 14:17 Prep Batch: XXX19540 Prep Method: SW3550C Prep Date/Time: 06/23/08 13:30 Container ID: Dilution Factor: 50 Analyst: JDH Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 22.734 g Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XMS4621 Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS Analysis Date/Time: 07/18/08 18:08 Prep Batch: XXX19540 Prep Method: SW3550C Prep Date/Time: 06/23/08 13:30 Container ID: Dilution Factor: 100 Analyst: JDH

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: 

### RHTK17-1 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time SGS Ref. #: 1082739001 Collection Date/Time: 06/10/08 14:05 Receipt Date/Time: 06/12/08 11:27 Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Soil/Solid (dry weight) Percent Solids: 89.2

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Solids

MDL DF

Total Solids 89.2 % SPT7676 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: SPT7676 Analytical Method: SM20 2540G Analysis Date/Time: 06/18/08 11:55 Container ID:1082739001-B Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JLK

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: 

### TB01 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time SGS Ref. #: 1082739003 Collection Date/Time: 06/10/08 08:05 Receipt Date/Time: 06/12/08 11:27 Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Fuels Department

MDL DF

Gasoline Range Organics ND 100 ug/L VFC9029 VXX18305 10.0 1 Benzene ND 0.500 ug/L VFC9029 VXX18305 0.150 1 Toluene ND 2.00 ug/L VFC9029 VXX18305 0.620 1 Ethylbenzene ND 2.00 ug/L VFC9029 VXX18305 0.620 1 o-Xylene ND 2.00 ug/L VFC9029 VXX18305 0.620 1 P & M -Xylene ND 2.00 ug/L VFC9029 VXX18305 0.620 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 93.3 50-150 % VFC9029 VXX18305 1 1,4-Difluorobenzene <surr> 88.7 88-105 % VFC9029 VXX18305 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VFC9029 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 06/24/08 10:44 Prep Batch: VXX18305 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 06/24/08 09:00 Container ID:1082739003-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VFC9029 Analytical Method: SW8021B Analysis Date/Time: 06/24/08 10:44 Prep Batch: VXX18305 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 06/24/08 09:00 Container ID:1082739003-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)Matrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:22 Batch Method Date Prep 

### 835914 Method Blank The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Soil/Solid (dry weight) QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082739001

Parameter Results Reporting/Control Limit Units Analysis Date MDL



### Solids



### Total Solids 100 % 06/18/08

Instrument Method Batch SPT7676

SM20 2540GMatrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:22 Batch Method Date Prep 

### 837228 Method Blank The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Soil/Solid (dry weight) XXX19540 SW3550C 06/23/2008 QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082739001

Parameter Results Reporting/Control Limit Units Analysis Date MDL


### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS


### Acenaphthylene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/08/08 

### 1.48 Acenaphthene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/08/08 

### 1.48 Fluorene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/08/08 

### 1.48 Phenanthrene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/08/08 

### 1.48 Anthracene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/08/08 

### 1.48 Fluoranthene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/08/08 

### 1.48 Pyrene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/08/08 

### 1.48 Benzo(a)Anthracene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/08/08 

### 1.48 Chrysene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/08/08 

### 1.48 Benzo[b]Fluoranthene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/08/08 

### 1.48 Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/08/08 

### 1.48 Benzo[a]pyrene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/08/08 

### 1.48 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/08/08 

### 1.48 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/08/08 

### 1.48 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/08/08 

### 1.48 Naphthalene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/08/08 

### 1.48 1-Methylnaphthalene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/08/08 

### 1.48 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/08/08 

### 1.48
Surrogates 

### Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 58.1 30-125 % 07/08/08

Instrument Method Batch XMS4602

8270D SIMS HP 5890 Series II MS2 SVOAMatrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:22 Batch Method Date Prep 

### 837470 Method Blank The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Soil/Solid (dry weight) VXX18296 SW5035A 06/24/2008 QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082739001

Parameter Results Reporting/Control Limit Units Analysis Date MDL



### Volatile Fuels Department


### Gasoline Range Organics ND 2500 ug/Kg 06/24/08 

### 500
Surrogates


### 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 94.8 60-120 % 06/24/08

Instrument Method Batch VFC9022

SW8015C HP 5890 Series II PID+HECD VBA



### Benzene ND 12.5 ug/Kg 06/24/08 

### 4.00 Toluene ND 50.0 ug/Kg 06/24/08 

### 15.0 Ethylbenzene ND 50.0 ug/Kg 06/24/08 

### 15.0 o-Xylene ND 50.0 ug/Kg 06/24/08 

### 15.0 P & M -Xylene ND 50.0 ug/Kg 06/24/08 

### 15.0
Surrogates 

### 1,4-Difluorobenzene <surr> 91.4 85-110 % 06/24/08

Instrument Method Batch VFC9022

SW8021B HP 5890 Series II PID+HECD VBAMatrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:22 Batch Method Date Prep 

### 837656 Method Blank The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Soil/Solid (dry weight) XXX19550 SW3550C 06/25/2008 QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082739001

Parameter Results Reporting/Control Limit Units Analysis Date MDL



### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department


### Diesel Range Organics 6.12 J 9.95 mg/Kg 06/26/08 

### 3.08
Surrogates


### 5a Androstane <surr> 75.1 60-120 % 06/26/08

Instrument Method Batch XFC8010

SW8015C HP 5890 Series II FID SV A RMatrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:22 Batch Method Date Prep 

### 837928 Method Blank The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) VXX18305 SW5030B 06/24/2008 QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082739003

Parameter Results Reporting/Control Limit Units Analysis Date MDL



### Volatile Fuels Department


### Gasoline Range Organics ND 100 ug/L 06/24/08 

### 10.0
Surrogates


### 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 90.9 50-150 % 06/24/08

Instrument Method Batch VFC9029

SW8015C HP 5890 Series II PID+FID VCA



### Benzene ND 0.500 ug/L 06/24/08 

### 0.150 Toluene ND 2.00 ug/L 06/24/08 

### 0.620 Ethylbenzene ND 2.00 ug/L 06/24/08 

### 0.620 o-Xylene ND 2.00 ug/L 06/24/08 

### 0.620 P & M -Xylene ND 2.00 ug/L 06/24/08 

### 0.620
Surrogates 

### 1,4-Difluorobenzene <surr> 91 88-105 % 06/24/08

Instrument Method Batch VFC9029

SW8021B HP 5890 Series II PID+FID VCAMatrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:22
Batch Method Date Original Prep



### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Duplicate 835915

Soil/Solid (dry weight) 1082604001

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082739001

Parameter QC Result Analysis Date RPD RPD

Limits Original Result Units



### Solids



### 76.3 78.7 % 3 (< 15 ) 06/18/2008 

### Total Solids

Batch Method Instrument 

### SPT7676

SM20 2540GMatrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:22
Batch Method Date Original Prep



### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Duplicate 838156

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082739001

Parameter QC Result Analysis Date RPD RPD

Limits Original Result Units



### Oils Laboratory



### GT200 degrees F 06/26/2008 

### Ignitability Seta Flash

Batch Method Instrument 

### FHV4987

SW1020A Seta-Flash Flsh Pnt TesterMatrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:22
Batch Method Date Original Prep



### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Duplicate 838157

Soil/Solid (dry weight) QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082739001

Parameter QC Result Analysis Date RPD RPD

Limits Original Result Units



### Oils Laboratory



### GT200 degrees F 06/26/2008 

### Ignitability Seta Flash

Batch Method Instrument 

### FHV4987

SW1020A Seta-Flash Flsh Pnt TesterMatrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:22
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 837229 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Soil/Solid (dry weight) XXX19540 SW3550C 06/23/2008

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082739001

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits


### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS 

### Acenaphthylene LCS 13.5 61 ( 45-102 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008
Acenaphthene LCS 10.8 49 ( 45-99 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Fluorene LCS 12.2 55 ( 50-107 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Phenanthrene LCS 12.3 56 ( 50-110 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Anthracene LCS 12.6 57 ( 28-103 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Fluoranthene LCS 11.5 52 ( 55-115 ) * 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Pyrene LCS 10.5 47 ( 45-120 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008
Benzo(a)Anthracene LCS 15.1 68 ( 40-110 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008
Chrysene LCS 11.2 51 ( 55-110 ) * 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008
Benzo[b]Fluoranthene LCS 14.2 64 ( 45-115 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008
Benzo[k]fluoranthene LCS 13.9 63 ( 45-120 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Benzo[a]pyrene LCS 12.3 55 ( 10-102 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008
Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene LCS 18.2 82 ( 40-120 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008
Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene LCS 19.6 88 ( 40-125 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene LCS 16.2 73 ( 40-118 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008
Naphthalene LCS 10.5 48 ( 40-92 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008
1-Methylnaphthalene LCS 10.5 47 ( 30-97 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008
2-Methylnaphthalene LCS 10.6 48 ( 45-96 ) 22.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008

Surrogates 

### Terphenyl-d14 <surr> LCS 59 ( 30-125 ) 07/08/2008Matrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:22
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 837229 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Soil/Solid (dry weight) XXX19540 SW3550C 06/23/2008

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits


### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

Batch Method Instrument 

### XMS4602

8270D SIMS HP 5890 Series II MS2 SVOAMatrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:22
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 837471 Lab Control Sample 837472 Lab Control Sample Duplicate The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Soil/Solid (dry weight) VXX18296 SW5035A 06/24/2008

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082739001

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits



### Volatile Fuels Department



### Benzene LCS 1360 109 ( 80-125 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 LCSD 1360 109 0 (< 20 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

Toluene LCS 1310 105 ( 85-120 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 LCSD 1320 106 1 (< 20 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008
Ethylbenzene LCS 1330 106 ( 85-125 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 LCSD 1340 108 1 (< 20 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008
o-Xylene LCS 1310 105 ( 85-125 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 LCSD 1320 106 1 (< 20 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008
P & M -Xylene LCS 2760 110 ( 85-125 ) 2500 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 LCSD 2790 112 1 (< 20 ) 2500 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

Surrogates 

### 1,4-Difluorobenzene <surr> LCS 98 ( 85-110 ) 06/24/2008 LCSD 98 0 06/24/2008

Batch Method Instrument 

### VFC9022

SW8021B HP 5890 Series II PID+HECD VBAMatrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:22
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 837473 Lab Control Sample 837474 Lab Control Sample Duplicate The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Soil/Solid (dry weight) VXX18296 SW5035A 06/24/2008

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082739001

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits



### Volatile Fuels Department 

### Gasoline Range Organics LCS 11400 102 ( 75-115 ) 11300 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 LCSD 11000 98 4 (< 20 ) 11300 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

Surrogates 

### 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> LCS 96 ( 50-150 ) 06/24/2008 LCSD 99 3 06/24/2008

Batch Method Instrument 

### VFC9022

SW8015C HP 5890 Series II PID+HECD VBAMatrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:22
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 837916 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Soil/Solid (dry weight) XXX19550 SW3550C 06/25/2008

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082739001

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits



### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department 

### Diesel Range Organics LCS 133 80 ( 75-125 ) 166 mg/Kg 06/26/2008

Surrogates 

### 5a Androstane <surr> LCS 90 ( 60-120 ) 06/26/2008

Batch Method Instrument 

### XFC8010

SW8015C HP 5890 Series II FID SV A RMatrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:22
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 837929 Lab Control Sample 837930 Lab Control Sample Duplicate The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) VXX18305 SW5030B 06/24/2008

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082739003

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits



### Volatile Fuels Department



### Benzene LCS 88.3 88 ( 80-120 ) 100 ug/L 06/24/2008 LCSD 87.9 88 0 (< 20 ) 100 ug/L 06/24/2008

Toluene LCS 90.9 91 ( 80-120 ) 100 ug/L 06/24/2008 LCSD 90.7 91 0 (< 20 ) 100 ug/L 06/24/2008
Ethylbenzene LCS 94.0 94 ( 87-125 ) 100 ug/L 06/24/2008 LCSD 93.6 94 0 (< 20 ) 100 ug/L 06/24/2008
o-Xylene LCS 93.0 93 ( 85-120 ) 100 ug/L 06/24/2008 LCSD 92.8 93 0 (< 20 ) 100 ug/L 06/24/2008
P & M -Xylene LCS 185 93 ( 87-125 ) 200 ug/L 06/24/2008 LCSD 185 93 0 (< 20 ) 200 ug/L 06/24/2008

Surrogates 

### 1,4-Difluorobenzene <surr> LCS 99 ( 88-105 ) 06/24/2008 LCSD 98 0 06/24/2008

Batch Method Instrument 

### VFC9029

SW8021B HP 5890 Series II PID+FID VCAMatrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:22
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 837931 Lab Control Sample 837932 Lab Control Sample Duplicate The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) VXX18305 SW5030B 06/24/2008

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082739003

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits



### Volatile Fuels Department 

### Gasoline Range Organics LCS 206 103 ( 79-108 ) 200 ug/L 06/24/2008 LCSD 199 100 3 (< 20 ) 200 ug/L 06/24/2008

Surrogates 

### 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> LCS 93 ( 50-150 ) 06/24/2008 LCSD 94 2 06/24/2008

Batch Method Instrument 

### VFC9029

SW8015C HP 5890 Series II PID+FID VCAMatrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:22
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 838082 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Other Liquids QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082739001

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits



### Oils Laboratory 

### Ignitability Seta Flash LCS 79.0 101 ( 98.5-101.5 ) 78 degrees F 06/26/2008

Batch Method Instrument 

### FHV4987

SW1020A Seta-Flash Flsh Pnt TesterMatrix SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:22 Batch Method Date Original Prep 

### 837230 Matrix Spike 837231 Matrix Spike Duplicate

1082602003 Soil/Solid (dry weight) XXX19540 Sonication Extraction Soil 8270 PAH SIM 06/23/2008

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082739001

Parameter QC Result Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date MS/MSD Limits RPD RPD Limits Original Result Qualifiers


### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS 

### Acenaphthylene MS ND 25.4 110 * ( 45-102 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 MSD 21.2 93 18 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 Acenaphthene MS ND 28.4 123 * ( 45-99 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 MSD 23.2 101 * 20 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 Fluorene MS ND 27.9 120 * ( 50-107 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 MSD 23.8 104 16 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 Phenanthrene MS 7.15 36.2 125 * ( 50-110 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 MSD 31.8 107 13 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 Anthracene MS 4.61 J 18.3 59 ( 28-103 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 MSD 17.2 55 6 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 Fluoranthene MS 49.4 109 257 * ( 55-115 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 MSD 90.9 181 * 18 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 Pyrene MS 49.1 98.6 214 * ( 45-120 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 MSD 83.0 148 * 17 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 Benzo(a)Anthracene MS 23.9 58.2 148 * ( 40-110 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 MSD 50.2 114 * 15 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 Chrysene MS 25.7 74.3 210 * ( 55-110 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 MSD 60.6 152 * 20 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 Benzo[b]Fluoranthene MS 28.6 92.9 278 * ( 45-115 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 MSD 75.3 204 * 21 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 Benzo[k]fluoranthene MS 13.8 50.4 158 * ( 45-120 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 MSD 39.2 111 25 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 Benzo[a]pyrene MS 19.8 59.1 170 * ( 10-102 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 MSD 48.4 124 * 20 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene MS 16.6 56.0 170 * ( 40-120 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 MSD 47.9 136 * 16 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene MS ND 31.8 137 * ( 40-125 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 MSD 28.7 125 10 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene MS 15.2 52.8 162 * ( 40-118 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 MSD 45.0 130 * 16 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 Naphthalene MS ND 23.0 99 * ( 40-92 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 MSD 17.9 78 25 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 1-Methylnaphthalene MS ND 28.2 122 * ( 30-97 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 MSD 21.4 93 27 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 2-Methylnaphthalene MS ND 14.4 62 ( 45-96 ) 23.2 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 MSD 12.9 56 11 (< 30 ) 22.9 ug/Kg 07/08/2008 SurrogatesMatrix SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:22 Batch Method Date Original Prep 

### 837230 Matrix Spike 837231 Matrix Spike Duplicate

1082602003 Soil/Solid (dry weight) XXX19540 Sonication Extraction Soil 8270 PAH SIM 06/23/2008

Parameter QC Result Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date MS/MSD Limits RPD RPD Limits Original Result Qualifiers


### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS 

### Terphenyl-d14 <surr> MS 13.4 58 ( 30-125 ) 07/08/2008 MSD 13.0 57 3 07/08/2008

Batch Method Instrument 

### XMS4602

8270D SIMS HP 5890 Series II MS2 SVOAMatrix SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:22 Batch Method Date Original Prep 

### 837477 Matrix Spike 837478 Matrix Spike Duplicate

1082739001 Soil/Solid (dry weight) VXX18296 GRO Extraction (S) 06/24/2008

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082739001

Parameter QC Result Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date MS/MSD Limits RPD RPD Limits Original Result Qualifiers



### Volatile Fuels Department


### Benzene MS ND 1300 54 * ( 80-125 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 MSD 1244 51 * 4 (< 20 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 Toluene MS 49.2 J 3969 161 * ( 85-120 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 MSD 3991 162 * 1 (< 20 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 Ethylbenzene MS 296 985 27 * ( 85-125 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 MSD 998 27 * 1 (< 20 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 o-Xylene MS 1270 3565 88 ( 85-125 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 MSD 3655 92 2 (< 20 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 P & M -Xylene MS 2250 4675 44 * ( 85-125 ) 4865 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 MSD 4742 46 * 1 (< 20 ) 4865 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 Surrogates 

### 1,4-Difluorobenzene <surr> MS 2321 96 ( 85-110 ) 06/24/2008 MSD 2321 96 0 06/24/2008

Batch Method Instrument 

### VFC9022

SW8021B HP 5890 Series II PID+HECD VBAMatrix SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:22 Batch Method Date Original Prep 

### 837479 Matrix Spike 837480 Matrix Spike Duplicate

1082739001 Soil/Solid (dry weight) VXX18296 GRO Extraction (S) 06/24/2008

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082739001

Parameter QC Result Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date MS/MSD Limits RPD RPD Limits Original Result Qualifiers



### Volatile Fuels Department 

### Gasoline Range Organics MS 111000 152466 126 * ( 75-115 ) 21861 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 MSD 155830 140 * 2 (< 20 ) 21861 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 Surrogates 

### 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> MS 14574 684 * ( 50-150 ) 06/24/2008 MSD 14798 694 * 2 06/24/2008

Batch Method Instrument 

### VFC9022

SW8015C HP 5890 Series II PID+HECD VBA

## Hager, Barbara (Anchorage)

From: Hart, Jeff [jshart@tecinc.com] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 12:26 PM To: Hager, Barbara (Anchorage) Subject: RE: 1082739 9121 Red Hill BFSF 

## Pa g e 1 of 2

6/27/2008 Please proceed.

TEC Inc. Jeff S. Hart, R.G. Principal, Senior Project Manager 1001 Bishop Street, Suite 1400 A SB Towe r Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Telephone (808) 528-1445 Facsimile (808) 528-0768

From: Hager, Barbara (Anchorage) [m ailto:Barbara.Hager@sgs.com] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:10 AM To: Hart, Jeff Cc: Homestead, Charles (Anchorage) Subject: 1082739 9121 Red Hill BFSF

Jeff Due to lab error this sample was extrac t 1 day outside the 14 day holding time. Please let me know if you w ould like to proceed with analysis. Thanks Barbara 

# Barbara A. Hager
SGS Environmental Services Inc. Alaska Division Project Manager 

## 200 West Potter Drive Anchorage, Alaska 99518 Phone: (907) 562-2343 Direct: (907) 550-3211 Fax: (907) 561-5301

SGS sends analytical reports via the Internet as Portable Document Form at (PDF) files. Reports in this format, with authenticat ed electronic signatures, are considered official reports. No hard copy reports will be sent either by fax or U.S. Postal Se rvice unless otherwise requested . You may distribute your PDF files electronically or as printed hardcopies, as long as they are distributed in their entirety.



## Information in this email and any attachments is confidential and intended solely for the use of the indi vidual(s) to whom it is addressed or otherwise directed. Please note th at any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Company. Finally, the recipient should check th is email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The Company accepts no liability for any damage

## SGS Work Order:

Contents:
Cover Page Case Narrative Final Report Pages Quality Control Summary Forms Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt Forms 

## Project: Client: 

# SGS Environmental Services Alaska Division Level II Laboratory Data Report

Released by:

Note: Unless otherwise noted, all quality assurance/quality control criteria is in compliance with the standards set forth by the proper regulatory authority, the SGS Quality Assurance Program Plan, and the National Environmental Accreditation Conference. 

## 9121 Red Hill BFSF The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 1082865

## CASE NARRATIVE Print Date: 7/21/2008

Workorder No.: 1082865 Project Name: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Client Name: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)

Lab Sample ID 

## Sample Comments

Sample Type Client Sample ID Refer to the sample receipt form for information on sample condition.

1082865001 AK101/8021B - BFB (surrogate) recovery does not meet QC goals (biased high) due to hydrocarbon interference.

8015C DRO - The pattern is consistent with a weathered middle distillate. 8015C - DRO MB result is greater than one-half the PQL, but less than PQL. PS RHTK17-3

837477 AK101/8015C - MS recovery does not meet QC goals (biased high) due to hydrocarbon interference. The associated

LCS/LCSD meet all QC goals. MS RHTK17-1(1082739001MS)

837478 AK101/8015C - MSD recovery does not meet QC goals (biased high) due to hydrocarbon interference. The associated

LCS/LCSD meet all QC goals. MSD RHTK17-1(1082739001MSD)

837479 AK101/8015C - MS recovery does not meet QC goals (biased high) due to matrix interference. The associated LCS/LCSD

meet all QC goals. MS RHTK17-1(1082739001MS)

837480 AK101/8015C - MSD recovery does not meet QC goals (biased high) due to matrix interference. The associated LCS/LCSD

meet all QC goals. MSD RHTK17-1(1082739001MSD)

837656 8015C - DRO MB result is greater than one-half the PQL, but less than PQL.

MB MB for HBN 201919 [XXX/19550]

842288 8270D SIMS - CCV recoveries do not meet QC criteria for indeno(1,2,3-c,d) pyrene and dibenzo(a,h)anthracene (biased

high). The analytes are not detected above the PQL in the associated samples. CCV CCV for HBN 202908 [XMS/4616]

842707 8270D SIMS - CCV recovery for dibenzo(a,h)anthracene does not meet QC criteria (biased high). The analyte does not read

above the PQL in the associated samples. CCV CCV for HBN 202984 [XMS/4621]

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage Alaska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5301 ww w. us. sgs.com M em ber of SG S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)

# Laboratory Analytical Report

Project: Client:

Workorder No.: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)



### 1082865

Certification:
I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, both technically and for completeness, other than the conditions noted on the sample data sheet(s) and/or the case narrative. This certification applies only to the tested parameters and the specific sample(s) received at the laboratory. 1001 Bishop Street Ste 1400 ASB Tower Honolulu, HI 96813
Attn: Jeff Hart T: (808)528-1445 F:(808)528-0768 jshart@tecinc.com

Barbara Hager Barbara.Hager@sgs.com Project Manager 

### 9121 Red Hill BFSF

If you have any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further assistance, please contact your SGS Project Manager.

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G roupEnclosed are the analytical results associated with this workorder.
As required by the state of Alaska and the USEPA, a formal Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program is maintained by SGS. A copy of our Quality Assurance Plan (QAP), which outlines this program is available at your request.
The laboratory certification numbers are AK971-05 (DW), UST-005 (CS) and AK00971 (Micro) for ADEC and 001992 for NELAP (RCRA methods: 1020A, 1311, 6010B, 7470A,7471A,9040B,9045C, 9056, 9060, 9065, 8015B, 8021B, 8081A/8082, 8260B, 8270C).
Except as specifically noted, all statements and data in this report are in conformance to the provisions set forth by the SGS QAP, the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program and, when applicable, other regulatory authorities.
If you have any questions regarding this report or if we can be of any assistance, please contact your SGS Project Manager at 907-562-2343.

The following descriptors may be found on your report which will serve to further qualify the data.

MDL Method Detection Limit PQL Practical Quantitation Limit (reporting limit). CL Control Limit U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected. F Indicates value that is greater than or equal to the MDL. J The quantitation is an estimation. ND Indicates the analyte is not detected B Indicates the analyte is found in a blank associated with the sample.

* The analyte has exceeded allowable regulatory or control limits. D The analyte concentration is the result of dilution. GT Greater Than LT Less Than Q QC parameter out of acceptance range. M A matrix effect was present. E The analyte result is above the calibrated range. R Rejected DF Analytical Dilution Factor JL The analyte was positively identified, but the quantitation is a low estimation. <Surr> Surrogate QC spiked standard <Surr/IS> Surrogate / Internal Standard QC spiked standard QC Quality Control QA Quality Assurance MB Method Blank LCS (D) Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate) MS(D) Matrix Spike (Duplicate) BMS(D) Site Specific Matrix Spike RPD Relative Percent Difference ICV Initial Calibration Verification CCV Continuous Calibration Verification MSA Method of Standard Addition Notes: Soil samples are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise specified Print Date: 7/21/2008

Notes: All DRO/RRO analysese are integrated per SOP.

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage Alaska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5301 ww w. us. sgs.com M em ber of SG S G roup

## SAMPLE SUMMARY Client Name: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Project Name: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Workorder No.: 1082865 

## Analytical Methods

Method Description Analytical Method 8270 PAH SIM Semi-Volatiles GC/MS 8270D SIMS DRO by 8015B (S) SW8015C GRO/BTEX (W) SW8015C GRO/BTEX (W) SW8021B Ignitability Seta Flash SW1020A Percent Solids SM2540G SM20 2540G Print Date: 7/21/2008



## Sample ID Cross Reference
Client Sample ID Lab Sample ID 1082865001 RHTK17-3
1082865002 TB01

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage Alaska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5301 ww w. us. sgs.com M em ber of SG S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: 

### RHTK17-3 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time SGS Ref. #: 1082865001 Collection Date/Time: 06/17/08 11:05 Receipt Date/Time: 06/19/08 11:20 Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Soil/Solid (dry weight) Percent Solids: 86.7

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Oils Laboratory

MDL DF

Ignitability Seta Flash GT200 70.0 degrees F FHV4987 70.0 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: FHV4987 Analytical Method: SW1020A Analysis Date/Time: 06/26/08 13:10 Container ID:1082865001-C Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: FWY

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: 

### RHTK17-3 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time SGS Ref. #: 1082865001 Collection Date/Time: 06/17/08 11:05 Receipt Date/Time: 06/19/08 11:20 Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Soil/Solid (dry weight) Percent Solids: 86.7

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Fuels Department

MDL DF

Gasoline Range Organics 110000 3390 ug/Kg VFC9022 VXX18296 678 1 Benzene ND 16.9 ug/Kg VFC9022 VXX18296 5.42 1 Toluene ND 67.8 ug/Kg VFC9022 VXX18296 20.3 1 Ethylbenzene 90.0 67.8 ug/Kg VFC9022 VXX18296 20.3 1 o-Xylene 1270 67.8 ug/Kg VFC9022 VXX18296 20.3 1 P & M -Xylene 1950 67.8 ug/Kg VFC9022 VXX18296 20.3 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 856 60-120 % VFC9022 VXX18296 1 

### * 1,4-Difluorobenzene <surr> 89.9 85-110 % VFC9022 VXX18296 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 45.945 g Prep Extract Vol.: 31.13 mL Analytical Batch: VFC9022 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 06/24/08 12:36 Prep Batch: VXX18296 Prep Method: SW5035A Prep Date/Time: 06/17/08 11:05 Container ID:1082865001-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 45.945 g Prep Extract Vol.: 31.13 mL Analytical Batch: VFC9022 Analytical Method: SW8021B Analysis Date/Time: 06/24/08 12:36 Prep Batch: VXX18296 Prep Method: SW5035A Prep Date/Time: 06/17/08 11:05 Container ID:1082865001-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: 

### RHTK17-3 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time SGS Ref. #: 1082865001 Collection Date/Time: 06/17/08 11:05 Receipt Date/Time: 06/19/08 11:20 Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Soil/Solid (dry weight) Percent Solids: 86.7

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

MDL DF

Diesel Range Organics 5670 115 mg/Kg XFC8010 XXX19550 35.7 10 5a Androstane <surr> 83 50-150 % XFC8010 XXX19550 10

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 30.072 g Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XFC8010 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 06/26/08 15:05 Prep Batch: XXX19550 Prep Method: SW3550C Prep Date/Time: 06/25/08 11:00 Container ID:1082865001-B Dilution Factor: 10 Analyst: HKG

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: 

### RHTK17-3 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time SGS Ref. #: 1082865001 Collection Date/Time: 06/17/08 11:05 Receipt Date/Time: 06/19/08 11:20 Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Soil/Solid (dry weight) Percent Solids: 86.7

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

MDL DF

Acenaphthylene ND 28.5 ug/Kg XMS4616 XXX19571 8.56 5 Acenaphthene 154 28.5 ug/Kg XMS4616 XXX19571 8.56 5 Fluorene 156 28.5 ug/Kg XMS4616 XXX19571 8.56 5 Phenanthrene 23.0 J 28.5 ug/Kg XMS4616 XXX19571 8.56 5 Anthracene ND 28.5 ug/Kg XMS4616 XXX19571 8.56 5 Fluoranthene ND 28.5 ug/Kg XMS4616 XXX19571 8.56 5 Pyrene ND 28.5 ug/Kg XMS4616 XXX19571 8.56 5 Benzo(a)Anthracene ND 28.5 ug/Kg XMS4616 XXX19571 8.56 5 Chrysene ND 28.5 ug/Kg XMS4616 XXX19571 8.56 5 Benzo[b]Fluoranthene ND 28.5 ug/Kg XMS4616 XXX19571 8.56 5 Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 28.5 ug/Kg XMS4616 XXX19571 8.56 5 Benzo[a]pyrene ND 28.5 ug/Kg XMS4616 XXX19571 8.56 5 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene ND 28.5 ug/Kg XMS4616 XXX19571 8.56 5 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene ND 28.5 ug/Kg XMS4616 XXX19571 8.56 5 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND 28.5 ug/Kg XMS4616 XXX19571 8.56 5 Naphthalene 3300 571 ug/Kg XMS4621 XXX19571 171 100 1-Methylnaphthalene 6850 571 ug/Kg XMS4621 XXX19571 171 100 2-Methylnaphthalene 7290 571 ug/Kg XMS4621 XXX19571 171 100 Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 92.4 30-125 % XMS4616 XXX19571 5

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 22.745 g Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XMS4616 Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS Analysis Date/Time: 07/17/08 13:45 Prep Batch: XXX19571 Prep Method: SW3550C Prep Date/Time: 07/01/08 16:50 Container ID:1082865001-B Dilution Factor: 5 Analyst: JDH Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 22.745 g Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XMS4621 Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS Analysis Date/Time: 07/18/08 17:35 Prep Batch: XXX19571 Prep Method: SW3550C Prep Date/Time: 07/01/08 16:50 Container ID: Dilution Factor: 100 Analyst: JDH

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: 

### RHTK17-3 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time SGS Ref. #: 1082865001 Collection Date/Time: 06/17/08 11:05 Receipt Date/Time: 06/19/08 11:20 Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Soil/Solid (dry weight) Percent Solids: 86.7

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Solids

MDL DF

Total Solids 86.7 % SPT7683 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: SPT7683 Analytical Method: SM20 2540G Analysis Date/Time: 06/21/08 15:25 Container ID:1082865001-B Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: BJS

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: 

### TB01 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time SGS Ref. #: 1082865002 Collection Date/Time: 06/17/08 08:05 Receipt Date/Time: 06/19/08 11:20 Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Soil/Solid (dry weight) Percent Solids: 100

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Fuels Department

MDL DF

Gasoline Range Organics 1770 J 2640 ug/Kg VFC9022 VXX18296 527 1 Benzene ND 13.2 ug/Kg VFC9022 VXX18296 4.22 1 Toluene ND 52.7 ug/Kg VFC9022 VXX18296 15.8 1 Ethylbenzene ND 52.7 ug/Kg VFC9022 VXX18296 15.8 1 o-Xylene ND 52.7 ug/Kg VFC9022 VXX18296 15.8 1 P & M -Xylene ND 52.7 ug/Kg VFC9022 VXX18296 15.8 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 91 60-120 % VFC9022 VXX18296 1 1,4-Difluorobenzene <surr> 90 85-110 % VFC9022 VXX18296 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 47.4 g Prep Extract Vol.: 25 mL Analytical Batch: VFC9022 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 06/24/08 15:32 Prep Batch: VXX18296 Prep Method: SW5035A Prep Date/Time: 06/17/08 08:05 Container ID:1082865002-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 47.4 g Prep Extract Vol.: 25 mL Analytical Batch: VFC9022 Analytical Method: SW8021B Analysis Date/Time: 06/24/08 15:32 Prep Batch: VXX18296 Prep Method: SW5035A Prep Date/Time: 06/17/08 08:05 Container ID:1082865002-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: HM

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 7/21/2008

Client Sample ID: 

### TB01 All Dates/Times are Alaska Local Time SGS Ref. #: 1082865002 Collection Date/Time: 06/17/08 08:05 Receipt Date/Time: 06/19/08 11:20 Project ID: 9121 Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Soil/Solid (dry weight) Percent Solids: 100

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Solids

MDL DF

Total Solids 100 % SPT7686 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: SPT7686 Analytical Method: SM20 2540G Analysis Date/Time: 06/23/08 19:25 Container ID:1082865002-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: KDC

S G S E nvironm ental S ervices Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)Matrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:25 Batch Method Date Prep 

### 836870 Method Blank The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Soil/Solid (dry weight) QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082865001

Parameter Results Reporting/Control Limit Units Analysis Date MDL



### Solids



### Total Solids 100 % 06/21/08

Instrument Method Batch SPT7683

SM20 2540GMatrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:25 Batch Method Date Prep 

### 837318 Method Blank The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Soil/Solid (dry weight) QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082865002

Parameter Results Reporting/Control Limit Units Analysis Date MDL



### Solids



### Total Solids 100 % 06/23/08

Instrument Method Batch SPT7686

SM20 2540GMatrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:25 Batch Method Date Prep 

### 837470 Method Blank The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Soil/Solid (dry weight) VXX18296 SW5035A 06/24/2008 QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082865001, 1082865002

Parameter Results Reporting/Control Limit Units Analysis Date MDL



### Volatile Fuels Department


### Gasoline Range Organics ND 2500 ug/Kg 06/24/08 

### 500
Surrogates


### 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 94.8 60-120 % 06/24/08

Instrument Method Batch VFC9022

SW8015C HP 5890 Series II PID+HECD VBA



### Benzene ND 12.5 ug/Kg 06/24/08 

### 4.00 Toluene ND 50.0 ug/Kg 06/24/08 

### 15.0 Ethylbenzene ND 50.0 ug/Kg 06/24/08 

### 15.0 o-Xylene ND 50.0 ug/Kg 06/24/08 

### 15.0 P & M -Xylene ND 50.0 ug/Kg 06/24/08 

### 15.0
Surrogates 

### 1,4-Difluorobenzene <surr> 91.4 85-110 % 06/24/08

Instrument Method Batch VFC9022

SW8021B HP 5890 Series II PID+HECD VBAMatrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:25 Batch Method Date Prep 

### 837656 Method Blank The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Soil/Solid (dry weight) XXX19550 SW3550C 06/25/2008 QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082865001

Parameter Results Reporting/Control Limit Units Analysis Date MDL



### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department


### Diesel Range Organics 6.12 J 9.95 mg/Kg 06/26/08 

### 3.08
Surrogates


### 5a Androstane <surr> 75.1 60-120 % 06/26/08

Instrument Method Batch XFC8010

SW8015C HP 5890 Series II FID SV A RMatrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:25 Batch Method Date Prep 

### 839060 Method Blank The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Soil/Solid (dry weight) XXX19571 SW3550C 07/01/2008 QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082865001

Parameter Results Reporting/Control Limit Units Analysis Date MDL


### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS


### Acenaphthylene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/15/08 

### 1.48 Acenaphthene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/15/08 

### 1.48 Fluorene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/15/08 

### 1.48 Phenanthrene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/15/08 

### 1.48 Anthracene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/15/08 

### 1.48 Fluoranthene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/15/08 

### 1.48 Pyrene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/15/08 

### 1.48 Benzo(a)Anthracene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/15/08 

### 1.48 Chrysene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/15/08 

### 1.48 Benzo[b]Fluoranthene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/15/08 

### 1.48 Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/15/08 

### 1.48 Benzo[a]pyrene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/15/08 

### 1.48 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/15/08 

### 1.48 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/15/08 

### 1.48 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/15/08 

### 1.48 Naphthalene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/15/08 

### 1.48 1-Methylnaphthalene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/15/08 

### 1.48 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 4.94 ug/Kg 07/15/08 

### 1.48
Surrogates 

### Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 90.4 30-125 % 07/15/08

Instrument Method Batch XMS4613

8270D SIMS HP 5890 Series II MS2 SVOAMatrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:25
Batch Method Date Original Prep



### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Duplicate 836871

Soil/Solid (dry weight) 1082869002

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082865001

Parameter QC Result Analysis Date RPD RPD

Limits Original Result Units



### Solids



### 87.8 87.8 % 0 (< 15 ) 06/21/2008 

### Total Solids

Batch Method Instrument 

### SPT7683

SM20 2540GMatrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:25
Batch Method Date Original Prep



### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Duplicate 837319

Soil/Solid (dry weight) 1082834017

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082865002

Parameter QC Result Analysis Date RPD RPD

Limits Original Result Units



### Solids



### 84.6 84.4 % 0 (< 15 ) 06/23/2008 

### Total Solids

Batch Method Instrument 

### SPT7686

SM20 2540GMatrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:25
Batch Method Date Original Prep



### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Duplicate 838156

Water (Surface, Eff., Ground) QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082865001

Parameter QC Result Analysis Date RPD RPD

Limits Original Result Units



### Oils Laboratory



### GT200 degrees F 06/26/2008 

### Ignitability Seta Flash

Batch Method Instrument 

### FHV4987

SW1020A Seta-Flash Flsh Pnt TesterMatrix SGS Ref.# Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:25
Batch Method Date Original Prep



### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Duplicate 838157

Soil/Solid (dry weight) QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082865001

Parameter QC Result Analysis Date RPD RPD

Limits Original Result Units



### Oils Laboratory



### GT200 degrees F 06/26/2008 

### Ignitability Seta Flash

Batch Method Instrument 

### FHV4987

SW1020A Seta-Flash Flsh Pnt TesterMatrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:25
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 837471 Lab Control Sample 837472 Lab Control Sample Duplicate The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Soil/Solid (dry weight) VXX18296 SW5035A 06/24/2008

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082865001, 1082865002

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits



### Volatile Fuels Department



### Benzene LCS 1360 109 ( 80-125 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 LCSD 1360 109 0 (< 20 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

Toluene LCS 1310 105 ( 85-120 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 LCSD 1320 106 1 (< 20 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008
Ethylbenzene LCS 1330 106 ( 85-125 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 LCSD 1340 108 1 (< 20 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008
o-Xylene LCS 1310 105 ( 85-125 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 LCSD 1320 106 1 (< 20 ) 1250 ug/Kg 06/24/2008
P & M -Xylene LCS 2760 110 ( 85-125 ) 2500 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 LCSD 2790 112 1 (< 20 ) 2500 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

Surrogates 

### 1,4-Difluorobenzene <surr> LCS 98 ( 85-110 ) 06/24/2008 LCSD 98 0 06/24/2008

Batch Method Instrument 

### VFC9022

SW8021B HP 5890 Series II PID+HECD VBAMatrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:25
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 837473 Lab Control Sample 837474 Lab Control Sample Duplicate The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Soil/Solid (dry weight) VXX18296 SW5035A 06/24/2008

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082865001, 1082865002

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits



### Volatile Fuels Department 

### Gasoline Range Organics LCS 11400 102 ( 75-115 ) 11300 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 LCSD 11000 98 4 (< 20 ) 11300 ug/Kg 06/24/2008

Surrogates 

### 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> LCS 96 ( 50-150 ) 06/24/2008 LCSD 99 3 06/24/2008

Batch Method Instrument 

### VFC9022

SW8015C HP 5890 Series II PID+HECD VBAMatrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:25
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 837916 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Soil/Solid (dry weight) XXX19550 SW3550C 06/25/2008

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082865001

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits



### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department 

### Diesel Range Organics LCS 133 80 ( 75-125 ) 166 mg/Kg 06/26/2008

Surrogates 

### 5a Androstane <surr> LCS 90 ( 60-120 ) 06/26/2008

Batch Method Instrument 

### XFC8010

SW8015C HP 5890 Series II FID SV A RMatrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:25
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 838082 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Other Liquids QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082865001

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits



### Oils Laboratory 

### Ignitability Seta Flash LCS 79.0 101 ( 98.5-101.5 ) 78 degrees F 06/26/2008

Batch Method Instrument 

### FHV4987

SW1020A Seta-Flash Flsh Pnt TesterMatrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:25
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 839061 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Soil/Solid (dry weight) XXX19571 SW3550C 07/01/2008

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082865001

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits


### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MSMatrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:25
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 839061 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Soil/Solid (dry weight) XXX19571 SW3550C 07/01/2008

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits


### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS 

### Acenaphthylene LCS 15.6 71 ( 45-102 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008
Acenaphthene LCS 15.4 70 ( 45-99 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

Fluorene LCS 16.1 73 ( 50-107 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

Phenanthrene LCS 17.8 81 ( 50-110 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

Anthracene LCS 12.9 59 ( 28-103 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

Fluoranthene LCS 19.4 88 ( 55-115 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

Pyrene LCS 18.5 84 ( 45-120 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008
Benzo(a)Anthracene LCS 17.1 77 ( 40-110 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008
Chrysene LCS 17.3 78 ( 55-110 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008
Benzo[b]Fluoranthene LCS 16.3 74 ( 45-115 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008
Benzo[k]fluoranthene LCS 15.8 72 ( 45-120 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

Benzo[a]pyrene LCS 8.01 36 ( 10-102 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008
Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene LCS 10.4 47 ( 40-120 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008
Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene LCS 10.3 47 ( 40-125 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene LCS 10.5 48 ( 40-118 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008
Naphthalene LCS 15.2 69 ( 40-92 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008
1-Methylnaphthalene LCS 14.9 67 ( 30-97 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008
2-Methylnaphthalene LCS 14.8 67 ( 45-96 ) 22 ug/Kg 07/15/2008

Surrogates 

### Terphenyl-d14 <surr> LCS 90 ( 30-125 ) 07/15/2008Matrix SGS Ref.#

Client Name Project Name/# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:25
Batch Method Date Prep 

### 839061 Lab Control Sample

The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 9121 Red Hill BFSF Soil/Solid (dry weight) XXX19571 SW3550C 07/01/2008

Parameter QC Results Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date RPD LCS/LCSD Limits RPD Limits


### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

Batch Method Instrument 

### XMS4613

8270D SIMS HP 5890 Series II MS2 SVOAMatrix SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:25 Batch Method Date Original Prep 

### 837477 Matrix Spike 837478 Matrix Spike Duplicate

1082739001 Soil/Solid (dry weight) VXX18296 GRO Extraction (S) 06/24/2008

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082865001, 1082865002

Parameter QC Result Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date MS/MSD Limits RPD RPD Limits Original Result Qualifiers



### Volatile Fuels Department


### Benzene MS ND 1300 54 * ( 80-125 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 MSD 1244 51 * 4 (< 20 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 Toluene MS 49.2 J 3969 161 * ( 85-120 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 MSD 3991 162 * 1 (< 20 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 Ethylbenzene MS 296 985 27 * ( 85-125 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 MSD 998 27 * 1 (< 20 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 o-Xylene MS 1270 3565 88 ( 85-125 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 MSD 3655 92 2 (< 20 ) 2433 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 P & M -Xylene MS 2250 4675 44 * ( 85-125 ) 4865 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 MSD 4742 46 * 1 (< 20 ) 4865 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 Surrogates 

### 1,4-Difluorobenzene <surr> MS 2321 96 ( 85-110 ) 06/24/2008 MSD 2321 96 0 06/24/2008

Batch Method Instrument 

### VFC9022

SW8021B HP 5890 Series II PID+HECD VBAMatrix SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:25 Batch Method Date Original Prep 

### 837479 Matrix Spike 837480 Matrix Spike Duplicate

1082739001 Soil/Solid (dry weight) VXX18296 GRO Extraction (S) 06/24/2008

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082865001, 1082865002

Parameter QC Result Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date MS/MSD Limits RPD RPD Limits Original Result Qualifiers



### Volatile Fuels Department 

### Gasoline Range Organics MS 111000 152466 126 * ( 75-115 ) 21861 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 MSD 155830 140 * 2 (< 20 ) 21861 ug/Kg 06/24/2008 Surrogates 

### 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> MS 14574 684 * ( 50-150 ) 06/24/2008 MSD 14798 694 * 2 06/24/2008

Batch Method Instrument 

### VFC9022

SW8015C HP 5890 Series II PID+HECD VBAMatrix SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:25 Batch Method Date Original Prep 

### 839062 Matrix Spike 839063 Matrix Spike Duplicate

1082633021 Soil/Solid (dry weight) XXX19571 Sonication Extraction Soil 8270 PAH SIM 07/01/2008

QC results affect the following production samples: 

### 1082865001

Parameter QC Result Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date MS/MSD Limits RPD RPD Limits Original Result Qualifiers


### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MSMatrix SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:25 Batch Method Date Original Prep 

### 839062 Matrix Spike 839063 Matrix Spike Duplicate

1082633021 Soil/Solid (dry weight) XXX19571 Sonication Extraction Soil 8270 PAH SIM 07/01/2008

Parameter QC Result Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date MS/MSD Limits RPD RPD Limits Original Result Qualifiers


### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS 

### Acenaphthylene MS ND 16.8 74 ( 45-102 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 MSD 17.1 75 2 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 Acenaphthene MS ND 16.3 72 ( 45-99 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 MSD 16.6 73 2 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 Fluorene MS ND 17.0 75 ( 50-107 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 MSD 17.5 77 3 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 Phenanthrene MS ND 17.6 78 ( 50-110 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 MSD 18.1 80 3 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 Anthracene MS ND 18.0 79 ( 28-103 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 MSD 18.5 81 3 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 Fluoranthene MS ND 18.8 83 ( 55-115 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 MSD 19.4 85 3 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 Pyrene MS ND 18.4 81 ( 45-120 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 MSD 18.9 83 3 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 Benzo(a)Anthracene MS ND 18.5 82 ( 40-110 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 MSD 19.1 83 2 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 Chrysene MS ND 17.6 77 ( 55-110 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 MSD 18.0 79 2 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 Benzo[b]Fluoranthene MS ND 18.0 80 ( 45-115 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 MSD 18.8 83 4 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 Benzo[k]fluoranthene MS ND 17.6 77 ( 45-120 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 MSD 17.4 77 1 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 Benzo[a]pyrene MS ND 17.0 75 ( 10-102 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 MSD 17.1 75 1 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene MS ND 13.0 57 ( 40-120 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 MSD 13.0 57 0 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene MS ND 12.9 57 ( 40-125 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 MSD 12.9 57 0 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene MS ND 13.4 59 ( 40-118 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 MSD 13.6 60 1 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 Naphthalene MS ND 15.3 67 ( 40-92 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 MSD 15.2 67 1 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 1-Methylnaphthalene MS ND 15.7 69 ( 30-97 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 MSD 16.0 70 2 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 2-Methylnaphthalene MS ND 15.2 67 ( 45-96 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 MSD 15.3 67 0 (< 30 ) 22.8 ug/Kg 07/16/2008 Surrogates 

### Terphenyl-d14 <surr> MS 18.9 83 ( 30-125 ) 07/16/2008 MSD 19.6 86 3 07/16/2008Matrix SGS Ref.# Printed Date/Time 

### 07/21/2008 16:25 Batch Method Date Original Prep 

### 839062 Matrix Spike 839063 Matrix Spike Duplicate

1082633021 Soil/Solid (dry weight) XXX19571 Sonication Extraction Soil 8270 PAH SIM 07/01/2008

Parameter QC Result Pct

Recov Spiked Amount Analysis

Date MS/MSD Limits RPD RPD Limits Original Result Qualifiers


### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

Batch Method Instrument 

### XMS4613

8270D SIMS HP 5890 Series II MS2 SVOA