alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1565 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1565

To allow the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection to provide greater 
                     protection to servicemembers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 11, 2015

   Mr. Reed (for himself, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Warner, Mr. 
   Merkley, Ms. Warren, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Franken, Mr. Durbin, Mr. 
 Kaine, and Ms. Hirono) introduced the following bill; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To allow the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection to provide greater 
                     protection to servicemembers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Consumer Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION.

    Section 1002(12) of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 
(12 U.S.C. 5481(12)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (Q), by striking ``; and'' and 
        inserting a semicolon;
            (2) in subparagraph (R), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(S) sections 101, 107 (except with respect to 
                bailments), 108 (except with respect to insurance), 201 
                (except with respect to child custody proceedings), 
                207, 301, 302, 303, 305, and 305A of the Servicemembers 
                Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 511, 517, 518, 521, 
                527, 531, 532, 533, 535, and 535a).''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Hanley, Administrator, Respondent, vs. Peters, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Hill & Miller*and *Robert F. Holmes,*all of Baraboo.

For the respondent: *Grady, Farnsworth & Walker*of Portage.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


                  CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of netGuru, Inc.
(the "Company") for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: July 12, 2005                               By: /s/ Amrit K. Das
                                                       -----------------------
                                                       Amrit K. Das
                                                       Chief Executive Officer


Dated: July 12, 2005                               By: /s/ Bruce K. Nelson
                                                       -----------------------
                                                       Bruce K. Nelson
                                                       Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures
that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1194 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1194

 To require the Commissioner of Social Security to update the medical-
        vocational guidelines used in disability determinations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 5, 2015

   Mr. Hatch introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Commissioner of Social Security to update the medical-
        vocational guidelines used in disability determinations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Guiding Responsible and Improved 
Disability Decisions Act of 2015'' or the ``GRIDD Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. UPDATING OF MEDICAL-VOCATIONAL GUIDELINES.

    As soon as possible after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Commissioner of Social Security shall prescribe rules and 
regulations that update the medical-vocational guidelines, as set forth 
in appendix 2 to subpart P of part 404 of title 20, Code of Federal 
Regulations, used in disability determinations, including full 
consideration of new employment opportunities made possible by advances 
in treatment, rehabilitation, and technology and full consideration of 
the effect of prevalent languages on education.
                                 <all>
```
### FOR PUBLICATION


### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  M ICHAEL D. B RAMBLES , No. 01-55716

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No.

v. CV-00-08180- MMM 

#  W. A. D UNCAN , Warden; C. A. T ERHUNE , Director, California ORDER Department of Corrections, WITHDRAWING

Respondents-Appellees. OPINION



# 

Filed April 11, 2005

Before: David R. Thompson and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges, and William W Schwarzer,*

Senior District Judge.

ORDER

The previous opinion filed June 3, 2003, slip op. page 7173, amended

September 2, 2003, slip op. page 12539, and appearing at 330 F.3d 1197 (9th Cir. 2003), is withdrawn. Itmay not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit.

*The Honorable William W Schwarzer, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

4121PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2005 Thomson/West.
SLIP OP . 05-17 0 IN TH E UNITE D STATE S COUR T O F INTERNATIONA L TRAD E Befor e TH E HONORABL E GREGOR Y W . CARMAN , JUDG E GERDAU AMERISTEE L CORPORATION , )

Plaintiff, ) v . ) UNITE D STATES , ) Court N o 04-0060 8 Defendant , an d) ICDA S CELI K

ENERJITERSAN E v e ) ULASIM SANYAI , AS , )

Defendant-Interveno r

) ) ORDE R Upo n consideratio n o f

Plaintif f s September

8 , 200 6 Motio n fo r

Rehearin g an dth e parties ' response s thereto , i t i s hereb y ORDERED that

Plaintiffs Motio n fo r

Rehearin g i s denied . S O ORDERED . /S / Gregory W . Carma n

Judg e Dated . Ne w York , Ne w Yor k
.. . . e REF ~ nnl"""fr.rwm .....,....,.".,," ID:A58060 • TOt: « A)t'.;tl<l5 l l'l<U 11 l 

USCIB: 9 • 2/18 

6 December 19 54 

'f OP SEiOffiJI' FR()q?II 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: COMINT Capability to Provide Early Warning of CHICOM 

Attack on Formosa and the Off-Shore Islands. 

References: (a) USCIB 9.2/9 of 8 November 1954. 

(b) USCIB 9.2/8 of 29 October 1954. 

(c) USCIB 9.2/16 of 26 November 1954. 

1. As a result of USCIB consideration of reference (a) at its 

109th Meeting on 12 November 1954 it was agreed that: 

a. The proposed memorandum. submitted with reference (b) 

for the members of the Special Committee of the NSC would not be 

forwarded at this time. 

3. In addition to the report enclosed with reference (c) 

USCIBEC considered the following additional factors: 

b. CHINAT reaction to U.S. base-rights requests has thus 

far been prompt and favorable. 

./// 

Ci// 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

24 

USCIB: 9.2/18 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-20-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

TOP SECRET FRO'fll 
USCIB~ 9. 2/lB 

iOP SBOREH' FRGfH 

REF ID:A58060 • TO .... ,., .... ,.. ......... m '"'"'Orn r &5ECrtE 1 r :re 

6 December 1954 

Subject: COMINT Capability to Provide Early Warning of CHICOM. 

Attack on Formosa and the Off-Shore Islands. 

B. In view of the above, USCIBEC concluded that it is not yet 

clear that action by the Special Committee of the NSC is necessary to 

obtain the desired results nor are there sufficient facts a.t /hand to 

provide the Special Committee with a basis for action. USCI'.BEC 

therefore further agreed on the following course of action: 

!/ 

USGIB ~ 9 • 2/18 EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

- 2 -

TOP SECRET FROTII 
• I I 'P 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

USCIB~ 9.2/18 

6 December 1954 

TOP aECfl:Ei' FRe:I'H 

Subject: COMINT Capability to Provide Early Warning of CHICOM 

Attack on Formosa and the Off-Shore Islands. 

9. USCIBEC therefore recommends that the conclusion and course 

of action set forth in paragraph a above be approved and that the 

memorandum to the Special Committee enclosed with ~PfArence (b} be 

held in abeyance until and unless USCIBEC should report that the 

situation is unsatisfactory. 

10. This report by the Chairman, USCIBEC is submitted for consideration in connection with item 3 of the agenda for the llOth 

Meeting of USCIB at 1400, 10 December 1954. Due to press of time, it 

has been writ ten in advance of the minutes of the meeting on which it 

is based and has not been approved in detail by the members of USCIBEC. 

It is, however, believed to convey correctly the sense of the meeting. 

USCIB: 9. 2/lS - 3 -

TO:P SECRET FROTH
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001015593
<NAME>                        River Valley Bancorp
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         8,685
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         100
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    8,489
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         13,305
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           13,228
<LOANS>                                        110,068
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1,074
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 145,541
<DEPOSITS>                                     125,656
<SHORT-TERM>                                   1,100
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1,980
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     16,805
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 145,541
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                4,551
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1,136
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               188
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               5,875
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             3,349
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,412
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          2,463
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  22
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (9)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                2,870
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                149
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     73
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   73
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 2.98
<LOANS-NON>                                    0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   819
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               407
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  3
<RECOVERIES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1,074
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           3
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        1,071



</TABLE>
### -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/07 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■
■ ■ 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ●
●
● 

## ★ ● ● ● ●
**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

**The Board of Directors**

**Optimal Group Inc.**

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements of Optimal Group Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-115408), effective May 12, 2004, on Form S-8 (File No. 333-115050), effective April 30, 2004, on Form S-8 (File No. 333-65530), effective July 20, 2001 and on Form S-8/F-3 (File No. 333-08794), effective May 21, 1998 of our report dated March 13, 2006, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Optimal Group Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations, deficit and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, which report appears in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Optimal Group Inc.

 

 

(signed) KPMG LLP

 

Chartered Accountants

 

 

March 15, 2006

Montreal, Canada
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 00001

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

File Name Description

x 05183\05183_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05183\05183_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05183\05183_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05183\05183_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05183\05183_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

05183\05183_Certification Statement .pdf Plant certification statement

05183\Supplemental Documents\05183_EPAWTRBA.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05183\Supplemental Documents\05183_map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05183\05183_Checklist.xlsx EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

x 05183\05183_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x Draft Questions for Follow Up

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05183

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 05183\05183_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05183\05183_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05183\05183_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05183\05183_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05183\05183_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

05183\05183_Certification Statement .pdf Plant certification statement

x 05183\Supplemental Documents\05183_EPAWTRBA.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05183\Supplemental Documents\05183_map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05183\05183_Checklist.xlsx EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05183\05183_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
ntmettunire)-14162.!'

actisanal-DCSIALD

111111,1111P•111 7

October 30, 1964

MEMORANDUM FOR DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, RESEARCH

AND DEVELOPMENT

I have considered your attached proposal (alternative 13) for the

realignment of responsibilities for the SR-71 and YF-12A programs. In

general, I approve your concept; however, Colonel Geary, as Assistant

for Special Programs must continue to be directly responsible to me.

I am convinced that this relationship must continue until the SR-7I program transitions into an operational system status.

I do not wish to imply any lack of concern for your interests and

responsibilities in these activities. On the contrary, you must continue to

become more familiar with the details of these programs. In view of the

impending transition to an operational force of the SE-71 program, I

intend to have an early review of the SR-71 program, emphasizing these

aspects of planning and programming which bear directly on the efficient

creation of the operational SR-71 unit at Beale AFB next year. I have

asked Colonel Geary to present this review on 20 November.

It is my intention that you participate directly in this review and

that proper representation by SAC also be included. My instructions to

Colonel Geary on this subject are contained in the attached memorandum.

After you have worked out the implementing details of the organizational alignment, I would appreciate reviewing the final arrangement

and obtain your thoughts on any further action you feel may contribute to

the effectiveness of the program.

Brockway McMillan

Director

Attachments 4r:4-National Reconnaissance Office

Proposal (Alternative 13)

Memo for Director, Prog D

OXCART

COPY bee in

COCO 111111 ISSEORET--
Alternative #3

1. Assign Program Director to ADC for all development matters

2. Establish SR-7ldtg-l2 office

Program Director remains responsible for Support, existing procedures

5. Use extension of present office facilities 6111111111111,

•

ISAFUSt

.1„AFCCS

Una) 

- AnrinDc

Jw•tsi for 1 ' 

Spee! Pror, t

D.:puty for

Development

ContractinG iProcrammingo

•

Pros: Provides overt office

Program Director in RDC

Vero efficient canninc (cross utilization)

Uses existing socuro facilitios

Starting point for lator split

Coast Admin complicated (two staff units)-

0:dors, travel femdt, etc.

ER situation difficult -

ADC cannot evaluato total job of Azst

Lost reports to two cm:tors (SAFUS - RDC)

SAFUSrolincuishosdiroct channol to Program Director.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from condensed
financial statements for the period ended March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,055                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,557                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       811                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     38,451                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,809                       0
<PP&E>                                         259,077                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 123,177                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 223,363                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,801                       0
<BONDS>                                         72,142                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           516                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      91,679                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   223,363                       0
<SALES>                                         52,659                  59,087
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,806                  61,130
<CGS>                                           49,514                  53,856
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,514                  53,856
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,021                   4,598
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,510                   1,428
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,239)                   1,248
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (811)                     516
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,428)                     732
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,428)                     732
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.28)                     .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)                     .14


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1366 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1366

 To amend the charter of the Gold Star Wives of America to remove the 
 restriction on the federally chartered corporation, and directors and 
   officers of the corporation, attempting to influence legislation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 2015

  Mr. Sanders introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the charter of the Gold Star Wives of America to remove the 
 restriction on the federally chartered corporation, and directors and 
   officers of the corporation, attempting to influence legislation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVISION OF FEDERAL CHARTER RESTRICTIONS ON GOLD STAR WIVES 
              OF AMERICA.

    Section 80507 of title 36, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (b); and
            (2) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections 
        (b) and (c), respectively.
                                 <all>
```