alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
• REF ID:A68049 • 

USCIB: 5.1/7 

14 June 1954 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MD1Bms OF USCIBEC: 

Subject: Change in U.S. Air Force Membership. 

This of'f'ice is informed by the Directorate of' Intelligence, 

USAF that, effective 9 June 1954, the U. S. Air Force member or 

USCIBEC is Lt. Colonel F. J. Harrold, vice Colonel Charles M. 

Townsend. 

USCIB 

USCIB: 5.1/7 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 09-04-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection the Annual Report of CornellCompanies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, John R. Nieser, Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.            TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.            The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   |   | /s/ John R. Nieser                      |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   |   | John R. Nieser, Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   | March 14, 2008                     |

 

Note:   The certification the registrant furnishesin this exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to theliabilities of that Section.  RegistrationStatements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionshall not incorporate this exhibit by reference, except as otherwise expresslystated in such filing.

 

----
SUBJECT NUMBER 

USCIB: 8.4/4 

• C01\~a1so

9 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Item 5 of the Agenda for the llOth Meeting of USCIB, 

held on 10 December 19.54. 

Subject: U.S. Monitoring Activitie~ .... --..... (USCIB S.4/1) 

(Note by the Secretariat:) 

USCIB considered this item briefl..T without arriving at a clear 

decision. It was understood by the Secretariat, however, that the NSA, 

CIA, and Department of Defense manbers would confer on this matter and 

proceed along lines mutual'.q agreeable to them. 

USCIB: 8.4/4 - l3 -

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 01-23-2015 pursuantto E .0. 1352\3 

C01'TDJDEl\ 1 ii 11 1TIAL
, 

•. ·• 

USCIB: 13/345 

roilnck%~65 950 

!eeUftl:T"! INFORMA I ION • 

24 

APPENDED DOCUMENTS CONTAIN 

CODE WORD MATERIAL 

23 June 1953 

TOI' 5'.Ee:HEt • SEffBR:EYI INPEIDMA'l'ICIN 

:MEMORANDID.f FOR THE MEMBERS OF USGIB: 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Possible Compromise of COMINT Codeword Inf'ormation. 

USCIB 1.3/308 dated 16 February 195.3. 

The enclosure, prepared by the Director, NSA, in accordance with the provisions of the reference, is forwarded 

:ror information. 

Enclosure 

DirNSA Serial 000333-S 

dated 15 June 1953. 

USCIB: 1.3/345 

H' D JONES 

Deputy Execu e Secretary, USGIB 

APPENDED DOCUMENTS CONTAIN 

CODE WORD MATERIAL 

TOP SECRET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-18-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 
r 

NATION.AL SECURITY AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 251 D. C. 

SeriaJ.: 000.3.3.3-S 

15 June 1953 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE ACTING EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, USCIB 

SUBJECT: Possible Compromise of COMINT Codeword Information 

1. On. 1.3 1'1a;y 1953 a cryptosecurity violation occurred at 

6920th Security Group, Johnson Air Force Base, Irumagawa, Japan. 

Ch that date the following was inadvertently transmitted in the 

clear over an interceptable radio circuit to Hq. USAFSS, Brooks 

Air Force Base, Texas: 

11 // TOP SECRET CANOE // CITE HQ USAFSS CRYPTO PASS " 

2. The codeword, per se, has been identified as being connected with a highly classified matter, but its association with 

CGIDIT is not indicated. No advantage can be foreseen in a 

change of' codeword, and such change is not proposed. 

3. The Director, GCHQ, has been requested to inform appropriate British officials. 

4. The f"oregoing is submitted in accordance with the Inclosure 

to USCIB: 13/308. 

FOR THE DIRECTOR: 

(Signed) 

ALFRED R. MARCY 

Colonel, US A:r:my 

Chief of' Sta.fr 

Enclosure with USCIB 13/345 dated 2.3 June 1953. 

TOP SECRET CANOE
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-50273

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Aldo Chavez-Garcia, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:20-CR-526-1

Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Aldo Chavez-Garcia has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Chavez-Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 26, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-50273 Document: 00516449659 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/26/2022
No. 21-50273

2

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-50273 Document: 00516449659 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/26/2022
# CE2004078EN.01058001.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/580 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/580

---

(2004/C 78 E/0613)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3543/03

by Claude Moraes (PSE) to the Commission

(28 November 2003)

Subject:   Free movement of Bulgarians

Subject:

Could the Commission please explain what the policy is on freedom of movement for Bulgarian citizens and Bulgarians with refugee status in the EU?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(14 January 2004)

(14 January 2004)

As the Honourable Member knows, Bulgaria will be a Candidate Country until their planned accession in 2007. Until 2007, provided accession takes place that year, Bulgarian nationals will be considered as third country nationals. Bulgarian nationals can enter the Union and move freely within the Schengen area for a period of up to three months.

As regards movement of Bulgarian workers, applications for residence and work permits are subject to the conditions and modalities in each Member State. There is however a provision in the Europe Agreement according to which the existing facilities for access to employment for Bulgarian workers accorded by Member States under bilateral agreements ought to be preserved and if possible improved. As to the establishment of Bulgarian companies and nationals in the territory of a Member State, Bulgarian nationals have a right under the Europe agreement to a treatment no less favourable than that accorded to the Member State's own nationals. The scope of the latter provision has been clarified in European Court of Justice case law.

The Honourable Member may be aware that on 25 November 2003 the Council adopted the Directive concerning the status of third country nationals who are long-term residents in a Member State (1). In accordance with Chapter III of that Directive, third country nationals (including Bulgarian citizens) who have been legally resident in a Member State for five years or more can benefit under certain conditions from a consolidated status on which basis they can enjoy the right to reside and work in other Member States. This Directive will have to be transposed by Member States into national legislation by November 2005 at the latest.

1

However, that Directive does not apply to those third country nationals who are refugees. The rights of refugees are set out in the 1951 Geneva Convention relating to the status of refugees of which all Member States are signatories. At this stage there is no Community law governing the freedom of movement of refugees in the Union.

---

(1)  Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003, OJ L 16, 23.1.2004, p. 44.

1

---
.. & - 'Ill • 

USCIB: 13.6/24 

8 February 1955 

TOP BEieREi' 

l@iMORANDUM FOR THE too~ OF USCIB: 

Subject: Transmission of Category III COllINT over Territories of 

Third Parties to the UKUSA Agreement. 

l. The enclosed request for USCIB approval of an exception to the 

provisions of paragraph 29, Appendix "B", UKUSA is forwarded at the 

request of the CIA Member. 

2. With the concurrence of all members, this matter will be considered as an additional item at the forthcoming (112th) Meeting of 

USCIB. 

In.closure 

CIA memo dtd 8 Feb. 1955 

U3CIB: 13 .6/24 

eclassifi ed and a ursuantto E .0. 1352 

.._. ~· -1 
. .. .. .. • 

CENTRAL JNTELLIGENCE AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

S FEB 1955 

:Ml!:liiORANDUM FCR: Executive Secretary, USCIB 

SUBJECT : Transmission of Category III COlllNT over Territories 

of Third Parties to the UKUSA Agreement. 

l. The Central Intelligence Agency has a requirement to provide 

Category III COMINT service to General J • Lawton Collins, Personal 

Representative of the President in Saigon, Viet Nam, for a limited 

time. 

2. Courier servie~ will be provided by the Ar.med Services 

Security Courier Service (AFSCS), originating in the Pentagon 

and utilizing both Military Air Transport Service (MATS) and 

commercial air carrier, and will be via Washington, San Francisco, 

Honolulu, Midway, Ma.nil.a to destination in Saigon. 

3. Authorization for the use of this route for pouching codel'lord .material, an exception to paragraph 29, Appendix B, UKUSA, 

requires 0USCIB approval. 

4. It is requested that approval of USCIB members be obtained 

by the most expeditious means possible. 

(signed) 

HUNTINGTON D. SHELDON 

CIA Member, USCIB 

Enclosure with WCIB 13.6/24 dated 8 Feb 55. 

TOP SECRET 
;re se ~,ciP=;1l65890 F . '4 ~ 

m eafaiuia 

Will uooa .,w 

Item' 

MQlqROTJID 

"'re:) 

,,p:=-< 

1,. Pal"sgrapb 41 ot UJa18A Appexl4u D p:ovta.a '118.1i USCI» llNet approve 

• :tQUt• :1nvot.vtrc \he transport Of UAe11eeypte4 Categ017 m COJC£ft QVG' 

the t«n1.*Y of a third porl.y. 

1. VSCD 13.6/21+ eU-culatea a memoruMi'Ull b7 1-l\o CIA Mm'bw bdicati»a 

that ht• accc-1 ..... retuir.-nt to ;prov14e Categor,y m COM11R •ervlc• 

ta Oenwal J .. t.avton CoUtiia, iD Sai&on, Y1.t 11111&. teneral ColUna 11 

Peraoae.l Re,t>raantative ot the '"81dent. !bS.• •WYice f.• IOI' a Umlted 

,,,... 

J. Jn tbat the courier route will zieoe••a111' tnvene thf.n'l Ji'U'\1 territory, tbe approval at fJSCtB 1• r.q.udtlld. Courier aervlce WS.11 be 

p:ovt4ed b7 .AU'COS tm4 vt.11 uttUce both MA!S 6114 CO""Mrc1al air oa.rrS.er. 

IJ:be t'O\ltitt vUl be Valbtisgton, Se». Prauciaco, lom>lulu, 1114wq1 Mam.la "o 

b•t1xw.ticm iJl aasaon.. 

~A'?l9JI 

i., lt i• r.c:ocmiende4 \ha"t the •A .ember aza:rov• tJd• "'uea'. 

-~- -- r II
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 875/2006

of 15 June 2006         

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 29th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 29th partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 31,288 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 16 June 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 June 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 185, 16.7.2005, p. 3.

----
# CE2004078EN.01054201.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/542 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/542

---

(2004/C 78 E/0563)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3413/03

by Olivier Duhamel (PSE) to the Commission

(18 November 2003)

Subject:   Eurobarometer

Subject:

A question on countries which represent ‘a threat to world peace’ in a recent Eurobarometer poll has upset certain countries, particularly Israel and the USA. One could, of course, debate the appropriateness of asking such a question, and even the way it has been formulated. Nobody doubts that a sort of ‘halo effect’ means that countries involved in military operations (domestic or foreign) which are to a greater or lesser extent the subject of dispute in the media risk, for that very reason, having a negative image worldwide.

At the very least, it would be preferable to pose the question in a slightly modified form, by asking ‘For each of the leaders of the following countries, tell me if, in your opinion, he or she represents a threat to world peace or not’ and adding ‘the Palestinian Authority’ to the list. Does the Commission intend in future to put the question in this form, rather than give up altogether on a useful indicator for understanding patterns of public opinion within the Union?

It would be interesting, furthermore, to investigate — as Eurobarometer has already done in the past — how much each individual questioned trusts his own nation and each of the other nations we wish to study.

Does the Commission believe that trust between nations is a ‘sine qua non’ of European integration and international life? If so, is the Commission prepared to put such a question again in the near future?

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(8 January 2004)

(8 January 2004)

The Commission would refer the Honourable Member to its answer to Written Question P-3334/03 from Ms Muscardini (1).

1

The Commission is aware of the limits to the question on which countries are a threat to world peace while considering that the results obtained reveal deep-seated prejudices. It thanks the Honourable Member for his suggestions, but it has not yet decided whether or not to use this indicator in a modified form.

The question of trust between peoples arose many times between 1976 and 1996, and on each occasion, it was shown to be increasing gradually in the Union. The Commission is planning to look into this matter again.

---

(1)  See page 263.

1

---
Exhibit 99.2



Certification of Disclosure Pursuant to 17 C.F.R. 240.13a-14 or 15d-14

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Peer M. Schatz, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of QIAGEN N.V.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the Evaluation Date); and



c)
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls;
and



6. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: March 31, 2003



|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|/s/    PEER
M. SCHATZ                        
|Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.68


                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         This Amendment to Employment Agreement (the "Amendment") is made this
1st day of April, 1997, by and between Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd.
(the "Company") and William R. Hurd ("Employee").


                                   WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, the Company and Employee entered into that certain Employment
Agreement dated October 28, 1993, as amended on September 8, 1995 (the
"Employment Agreement");

         WHEREAS, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited ("Sun") has indicated
that it intends to contribute $7.5 million to the Company for 5.3 million shares
of the Company's Common Stock pursuant to a stock purchase agreement (the "Stock
Purchase Agreement");

         WHEREAS, Sun's capital contribution pursuant to the Stock Purchase
Agreement is dependent, among other things, on reductions in Company expenses
and reductions in capital; and

         WHEREAS, Employee recognizes the importance of Sun's capital
contribution to the Company pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, and agrees
to accommodate Sun's need for reductions in the Company's expenses and capital
through modification of his Employment Agreement.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and covenants herein
contained, the parties covenant and agree that the following shall become
effective on the date that Sun and the Company execute the Stock Purchase
Agreement.

         1. Salary Reduction. Paragraph 3(a) of the Employment Agreement is
hereby amended by reducing the annual salary payable to Employee from $160,000
to $120,000. Except for the change in the amount of the annual salary, the
provisions of Paragraph 3(a) continue in full force and effect.

         2. Termination Without Cause. Subparagraphs 7(c)(ii)(a), (b) and (c) of
the Employment Agreement are hereby amended by changing the applicable period
over which the severance package is to be paid from eighteen (18) months to six
(6) months. Except for this change, the provisions of Subparagraphs 7(c)(ii)(a),
(b) and (c) continue in full force and effect.


<PAGE>   2




         3. No Change in Control. Employee hereby agrees that Sun's purchase of
the Company's shares and control of the Company's Board of Directors pursuant to
the Stock Purchase Agreement will not constitute a "Change in Control" for
purposes of Paragraph 9 of the Employment Agreement.

         4. Existing Employment Agreement. Except as modified hereby, the terms
and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and
effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employee and the Company have executed this
Agreement on the date first above written.


CARACO PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES, LTD.,
 a Michigan corporation


By:
   ----------------------------------
         Allan J. Hammer
    Its:  Chief  Financial Officer


EMPLOYEE:


-------------------------------------
William R. Hurd






                                       2
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

# Current Images

HomeHistoryNational Cryptologic MuseumExhibits & ArtifactsCryptologic MuseumCurrent Exhibits

Search

Search

                              - All Images 
                              - Design Elements 
                              - NSA Historical Photographs 
                              - Other 

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (0.31 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery