alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-35368) pertaining to the 1999 Employee Stock Options for Salary
Benefit Plan of Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. of our report dated March 21, 2001,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Amarillo Biosciences,
Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31,
2000.

                                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Dallas, Texas
April 9, 2001
waL WOSTA 22 Cet 56
* ’ (Cal Dodae/at/1507

1. The following are commats end recomsntations of WDILA roletive to the
ebove sudject: :

2. Pare 2.3.3, pore 2-9: The wording of the next to the last sentence -
-of this saragrogh is not clear. Our wnderstanding is that the foxsibility study
involves recovery of either the re-entry body or the test instrument conicter.
If this correct, a rewording is suggested.

pb. Bara 3.3.2, rage 3-11: We do not widerstand this prozo::
3 ¢ bcd heater or solar furnace in conjunction with the sh:
Sere is clvcys a possibility of necting the cos in the driver sscts
% to wadee the initial tespsrature but the se! . Lor ac
in our opinion involv2 otz2r tecmiquss t+ ce eveceste!d ond
woly be sufficiently strascctforvard as to clinincts tko necoscity for
rescareh progres. Tao cost estinwts of $2,CC0,CC0 for an cignt inch
‘our Lundred fost shoe’: tuba my oc lew. For e:mspls, the proscat cost
GS six inch shoct: tubs which coubines e test nocsle wita the tub: is

@. Pasa 3.3.34, rece 3-13: This posccreph should specify wiother tie
tumnel contesmlated is for eentinuces or interuittent opsratica. Cssisk
ins © trencndous bearing on cost. It shovlé elso specify whether tio tw. i
will use cir as tho fosting fluid.

é. Para 3.3.3¢, mage 3-14: The assucotion in the first porsoroph of
thts section that tumels with specds up to Hach 10, capable of testing cicht
inch rofele are standard requiresreconsideration. I know of no iacility in
the country nov in operation that is eapoble of meeting these requirccents.

c. Pora 3.3.4, page 3-15: The first sentence at the top of the pxuye
revarded Zince the EX gun is caly being stutied by Ci not teing

. With presont budgetary linitation, it is provable that the stuly
ot bo carried beyond the design and feecibility stuly of en 15,060" por
Secclerctor.

2
2
2

f. Pore 3.11.4, page 3-41: ‘There eypoars to be a word rissing in the
Sirst seaterese. Possibly it should read “is the large mit".

. Para 3.23.1, rege 3-46: In our opinion, future propulsive 7 .chois

vehicle should include th: study of mgetohydre ¢yncmies in tic

ay teorde, this is 2 definite possloility for flight in the wer

=G ower Cicosphora. Wirile it provides a foirly excl) thrust, 1% coz clso be

cent this vith very lev voisnts. It shoulé certeinly be, -

se of the rateliite. ere 5 RE:
cont

Tot.



oe ae

he Itexs 3.7.2 end 3.7.3 of the fecilities chart: It is believed tt
the locetion of these fecilities is‘ intended to be the missile devele:.2at conter

rethor thon tho medical cevelonment cexter. bec’
JOH! A. DCDGS, Lt Colonel, US? -
Chief, Ar=oxment Group .
1 Incl
Draft Cy ef Resserch & Develon=ont
of Guided Missile and Sroce Vehicle

Ove> Tine Pariod 1955-1975
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DUANE RONALD BELANUS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

LEO DUTTON; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 18

- 35474

D.C. No. 6:12

- cv

- 00065

- DLC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana Dana L. Christensen, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 24, 2020 * *

Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

Montana state prisoner Duane Ronald Belanus appeals pro se the district

court’s judgment, following a jury trial, in his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

alleging that defendants failed to protect him from inmate assault. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 26 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

Belanus has not shown plain error in Jury Instruction 10. See C.B. v. City of

Sonora , 769 F.3d 1005, 1016 (9th Cir. 2014) (where a party fails to preserve an

objection to jury instructions in a civil case, we review only for plain error). First,

because Belanus had been convicted at the time of the events at issue in this case,

the distri ct court properly applied Eighth Amendment standards to his claim. See

Pierce v. Cnty. of Orange , 526 F.3d 1190, 1205 (9th Cir. 2008) (pre

- trial detainees

have a Fourteenth Amendment protection against conditions that amount to

punishment, while convicted prisoners “ may be subject to punishment so long as it

does not violate the Eighth Amendment’s bar against cruel and unusual

punishment”) ; Resnick v. Hayes , 213 F.3d 443, 448 (9th Cir. 2000) ( holding tha t a

plaintiff who had been convicted but awaited sente ncing should be treated as a

convicted prisoner rather than a pretrial detainee for purposes of his constitutional

claim )

. Second, Jury Instruction 10 accurately states the elements of an Eighth

Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to a prisoner’s s afety. See Farmer v.

Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 847 (1994) ( explaining requirements of such a claim )

.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Belanus’s requests

for appointment of counsel because Belanus failed to demonstrate exceptional

ci rcumstances. See Palmer v. Valdez , 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009) (standard

of review; explaining the “exceptional circumstances” requirement).

AFFIRMED.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 690/2006

of 4 May 2006         

fixing the export refunds on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(a), (b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003, excluding malt, exported in the natural state, shall be as set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 5 May 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 May 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 4 May 2006 fixing the export refunds on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                            8,461,380
<SECURITIES>                      6,443,202
<RECEIVABLES>                    74,315,915
<ALLOWANCES>                    (13,917,442)
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 82,097,889
<PP&E>                            2,369,753
<DEPRECIATION>                     (453,024)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   86,873,336
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             1,920,917
<BONDS>                          48,830,170
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                80,188
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                       12,589,924
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     83,873,336
<SALES>                           4,404,905
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  4,404,905
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  2,475,888
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                1,569,398
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     359,622
<INCOME-TAX>                        111,438
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 248,184
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        248,184
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         0.030
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0.030
                             


</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In
connection with the Annual Report of CLP Power Hong Kong Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Betty
S. M. Yuen, Managing Director of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                                   
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: June 16, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Betty S. M. Yuen              
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Betty S. M. Yuen Managing Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,273
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,466
<ALLOWANCES>                                       405
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,951
<PP&E>                                           1,552
<DEPRECIATION>                                     905
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,833
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,471
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           15,509
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            48
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,694
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,833
<SALES>                                          5,205
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,347
<CGS>                                              311
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,492
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,164
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   665
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 138
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,447)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,447)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,447)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.91)


</TABLE>
#### State of Wisconsin and others, Appellants, vs. Industrial Commission and another, Respondents.

For the appellant State of Wisconsin: *Orland S. Loomis,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general.

For the appellant Clemens Janny: *Shannon & Cronin*of Oconomowoc.

For the respondent Industrial Commission: *Fons, Stoecker, Mietus & Fendryk*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent William Janny, Jr.: *Vilas L. Rasmussen*of Oconomowoc.

*By the Court.-*

-Judgment affirhied.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1049/2006

of 10 July 2006         

concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (1), and in particular Article 9(1)(a) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The goods described in column 1 of the table set out in the Annex shall be classified within the Combined Nomenclature under the CN code indicated in column 2 of that table.

Article 2

Binding tariff information issued by the customs authorities of Member States, which is not in accordance with this Regulation, can continue to be invoked for a period of three months under Article 12(6) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 July 2006.

For the Commission

László KOVÁCS            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 949/2006 (OJ L 174, 28.6.2006, p. 3).

(2)OJ L 302, 19.10.1992, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 648/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 117, 4.5.2005, p. 13).

----

ANNEX

----
Exhibit 32
 Certification of Principle Executive Officer and Principle Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:
November 9, 2009
    /s/
 Deborah C. WrightDeborah C. WrightChief Executive Officer and PresidentDate: November 9, 2009
    /s/
 Chris McFaddenChris McFaddenChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>

     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
     TimeOne,  Inc. June 30, 1998  financial  statements and is qualified in its
     entirely by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>             0000350133
<NAME>            TimeOne, Inc.

       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1998

<CASH>                                      289,493
<SECURITIES>                                535,736
<RECEIVABLES>                               48,464
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 21,940
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            997,559
<PP&E>                                      3,168,723
<DEPRECIATION>                              (886,446)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              3,405,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       128,613
<BONDS>                                     1,673,193
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    835
<OTHER-SE>                                  1,603,104
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                3,405,745
<SALES>                                     589,789
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            761,821
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               670,272
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          86,277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             91,549
<INCOME-TAX>                                11,229
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         80,320
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                80,320
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .01
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1997
<CASH>                                         232,660
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     27,445
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               291,733
<PP&E>                                         477,219
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 788,428
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          333,598
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,232,005
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,822,951)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   788,428
<SALES>                                      3,999,933
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,999,933
<CGS>                                        1,302,394
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,302,394
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,544,580
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,525
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                147,434
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            142,434
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   142,434
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT (31.1)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302



I, R. Ronald Swanner, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of South Street Financial Corp.;
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Signed:

/s/ R. Ronald SwannerR. Ronald SwannerChief Executive Officer




Date: May 5, 2005
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1152 

To make permanent the extended period of protections for members of uniformed services relating to mortgages, mortgage foreclosure, and eviction, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 30, 2015 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To make permanent the extended period of protections for 

members of uniformed services relating to mortgages, 

mortgage foreclosure, and eviction, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Foreclosure Relief and 

5 Extension for Servicemembers Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1152 IS

1 SEC. 2. MAKING PERMANENT EXTENDED PERIOD OF PRO2 TECTIONS FOR MEMBERS OF UNIFORMED 

3 SERVICES RELATING TO MORTGAGES, MORT4 GAGE FORECLOSURE, AND EVICTION. 

5 Section 710(d) of the Honoring America’s Veterans 

6 and Caring for Camp Lejeune Families Act of 2012 (Pub7 lic Law 112–154) is amended by striking paragraphs (1) 

8 and (3). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# CE2004070EN.01026301.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/263 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/263

---

(2004/C 70 E/284)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3400/03

by Niels Busk (ELDR) to the Commission

(11 November 2003)

Subject:   Interpretation of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002

Subject:

Is it the Commission's view that the wording of Article 5(g) of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 (1) allows scope for the use of sanitisation methods other than heat treatment?

1

Is the Commission familiar with alternative sanitisation methods and when can authorisation of those methods be expected?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(3 December 2003)

(3 December 2003)

Article 5(2)(g) of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the Parliament and of the Council of 3 October 2002 laying down health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption provides that Category 2 animal by-products may be disposed of by other means or used in other ways in accordance with rules laid down under Comitology procedure, after consultation of the appropriate scientific committee. These means or ways may either supplement or replace those provided for in subparagraphs (a) to (f) of the same Article 5(2).

Therefore, methods other than heat treatment may be allowed provided that they have undergone a scientific risk assessment and are found to be safe as a result of such assessment vis-à-vis animal and public health and the environment.

The Commission has received a number of applications for approval of such methods, which were sent to the Scientific Steering Committee (SSC) for opinion. The SSC has issued opinions, on the basis of which the Commission is discussing with Member States and with interested parties, the conditions for the approval of some of the methods. Authorisation is expected in the near future.

---

(1)  OJ L 273, 10.10.2002, p. 1.

1

---