alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1233 

To amend the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 to expand 

the electric rate-setting authority of States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 6, 2015 

Mr. WYDEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 

to expand the electric rate-setting authority of States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘PURPA’s Legislative 

5 Upgrade to State Authority Act’’ or ‘‘PURPA PLUS 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

8 Congress finds that— 

9 (1) section 210 of the Public Utility Regulatory 

10 Policies Act of 1978 (16 U.S.C. 824a–3)— 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1233 IS

1 (A) established a new class of nonutility 

2 generators known as ‘‘qualifying cogeneration 

3 facilities’’ and ‘‘qualifying small power produc4 tion facilities’’; and 

5 (B) encouraged the development of alter6 nate sources of energy with the requirement 

7 that utilities purchase energy offered by quali8 fying facilities; 

9 (2) since the date of enactment of that section, 

10 materials and designs for qualifying facility tech11 nologies have advanced and placed renewable re12 sources and cogeneration facilities within the reach 

13 of more consumers, including technologies such as— 

14 (A) solar photovoltaic panels; 

15 (B) small wind turbines; 

16 (C) storage technologies to support renew17 able energy; 

18 (D) small hydroelectric generators on exist19 ing dams, diversions, and conduits; 

20 (E) hydrokinetic generators; 

21 (F) gas microturbines; 

22 (G) steam-cycle turbines; 

23 (H) Stirling engines; 

24 (I) fuel cells; and 

25 (J) biomass boilers; 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1233 IS

1 (3) States need additional regulatory flexibility 

2 and authority to be able to incentivize the qualifying 

3 facilities; and 

4 (4) the avoided cost caps on qualifying facilities 

5 should be removed so that States can set the rates 

6 for qualifying facilities of not more than 2 

7 megawatts capacity. 

8 SEC. 3. STATE AUTHORITY TO INCENTIVIZE QUALIFYING 

9 FACILITIES. 

10 Section 210(b) of the Public Utility Regulatory Poli11 cies Act of 1978 (16 U.S.C. 824a–3(b)) is amended in 

12 the last sentence by inserting before the period at the end 

13 the following: ‘‘, except that the rule shall provide that 

14 a State regulatory authority or nonregulated electric util15 ity, acting under State authority, may set rates that ex16 ceed the incremental cost of alternative electric energy for 

17 purchases from any qualifying cogeneration facility or 

18 qualifying small power production facility of not more 

19 than 2 megawatts capacity’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	Natalie Knowles
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint bio">
    <div class="header">
        

        

        
        

        
        <span class="left"><img src="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/Templates/DOD2%20-%20Biography/bio-print-left.gif" style="border-width:0px;" /></span>
        

        

        

        
        <span class="right"><img src="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/Templates/DOD2%20-%20Biography/bio-print-right.gif" style="border-width:0px;" /></span>
        
        
        
        

        <h1 class="title">Natalie Knowles</h1>
        <h3 class="subtitle">Director, Compliance Group in the Engagement and Policy</h3>
        <h3 class="subtitle"></h3>
        <h3 class="subtitle"></h3>
    </div>
    <div>
        
        <div class="main-image">
            
<div class="bio-gallery gallery">
    
    <div class="img-wrapper">
        <img class="img-responsive" src="https://media.defense.gov/2023/Nov/03/2003333688/400/400/0/231102-D-IM742-1234.JPG" alt="Natalie Knowles is the Director, Compliance Group in Engagement and Policy at NSA."/>
        
    </div>
    
</div>



        </div>
        
    </div>
    <div>
        Ms. Natalie Knowles is the Director, Compliance Group in Engagement and Policy at the National Security Agency (NSA). Ms. Knowles has been an Agency employee for 33 years supporting Operations, Capabilities and Research in a number of technical and leadership positions. As the Director of Compliance, she is responsible for establishing, maintaining, and articulating a Compliance program to ensure verifiable conformance with the laws and policies designed to protect privacy during the conduct of NSA's mission operations.<br />
 
    </div>
</div>
    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
-TOP-SECRET-

-leg-NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

OFFICE OF THE DIREC"'OR April 25, 1972

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. RUSE

SUBJECT: A Baseline for SALT

General Furlong has relayed to me your desire that the

NRO should do whatever is necessary to establish a baseline

in expectation of an agreement from SALT in the next month

or so. I, too, have been concerned with a SALT baseline for

some time. Two years ago, I asked the USIB for guidance.

The Committee on Imagery Requirements and Exploitation

(COMIREX) and the SIGINT Committee (these are the USIB committees which generate formal collection requirements for

our NRO satellites) have already given us clear guidance on

long-term collection requirements for SALT. This guidance

says that the SALT-related activities are included within

the collection requirements already established by USIB. I

have no difficulty with that idea; but I have raised the

issue once more, in a short-term context, just to make sure

we don't overlook some opportunity for careful delineation

of a line of position at the time of a SALT agreement.

The COMIREX responded on April 20, 1972 that CORONA

Mission 1116 (launched April 19 1972) wou

It may be of interest for you to know that in September

1971 we flew CORONA Mission 1115 principally to provide a

SALT verification baseline. The collection requirements were

I think it would be helpful for,you to discuss your

concern with Dick Helms, just tolend emphasis to our inquiry,

---TOPIECRETIMAMS PION 414"04414 SIM

.11811 111MMTIVI ST02 Is lent NT ITKT

2747-7'

igien --awf.
ommllipplkSET:

CO.. GOMIS

which is in our normal (and highly effective) working

channels with USIB.

D, NIIIII. aete;,Illiis L. McLucas tit

111111111111, -TOP-SECREf--

UCIMI1C0 AU•ON.1K 111116•411•%

Nig goricilot *MI • 11 DWI •of AM.
-TOP-SECRETW:

2747-72. 25 Apr 72.

Copy 1 Mr. Rush

2! SS-4 STAR

Working Copy

Naucas

SS-1

SS-5

RF

Naka

SS-2

 A Baseline for SALT

•

-TOP-SECRETCACLUDNI 1110111 as.1041 n 1 C etramems

SOS ganC• • C 118110 le $011 111.0.•

COMM

MP, Or CONES

Pan Pailn
50X1 

Approved for Release: 2017/08/21 C05100023 ~',i ,; , 

50X1 ,>, 

;;'~" 

------------------------~--------------~--~~--~----------------- Approved for Release: 2017/08/21 C05100023
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Schick Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey T. Slovin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 1.     The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and 2.    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ Jeffrey T. Slovin ------------------------------------------ Jeffrey T. Slovin Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) May 31, 2006
Exhibit 11.1

                       FREEPORT-McMoRan INC.
              COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON AND
                      COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE

                           Three Months Ended            Nine Months Ended
                             September 30,                September 30,
                          ------------------------    ----------------------
                             1997          1996          1997         1996
                          ----------    ----------    ---------   ----------
                              (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
Primary:
  Net income applicable
   to common stock        $ (162,950)   $    2,875    $ (154,839) $   35,130
                          ==========    ==========    ==========  ==========


  Average common shares
   outstanding                23,536        25,488        23,627      26,509
  Common stock equivalents:
    Stock options                119           279            14         315
                          ----------    ----------    ----------  ----------

  Common and common
   equivalent shares          23,655        25,767        23,641      26,824
                          ==========    ==========    ==========  ==========

  Net income per common
   and common equivalent
   share                      $(6.89)         $.11        $(6.55)      $1.31
                              ======          ====        ======       =====
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC ContractorsRod Bundle Heat Transfer Facility Steam Cooling with Droplet Injection Experiments Data Report (NURE

# Rod Bundle Heat Transfer Facility Steam Cooling with Droplet Injection Experiments Data Report (NUREG/CR-7192, Volume 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7192, Volume 1 (PDF - 14.6 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** October 2014**Date Published:** May 2015

**Prepared by:** L.E. Hochreiter, F.B. Cheung, T.F. Lin, D.J. Miller, B.R. Lowery

The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802

**Prepared for:** Division of Systems Analysis Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

K. Tien, Project Manager

NRC Job Code N6154

Availability Notice

## Abstract

As part of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission safety analysis computer code development efforts, the Rod Bundle Heat Transfer (RBHT) test facility has been designed and constructed at The Pennsylvania State University. The test series described in this report is the steam cooling tests with droplet injection. A total of 85 steady-state steam cooling experiments with prescribed droplet injection was performed in the RBHT. The purpose of the experiments was to examine steady-state dispersed flow film boiling in prototypical rod bundle geometry for computer code model development and validation.

The Rod Bundle Heat Transfer facility is a full length, 3.66 m (12 ft.), 7 by 7 rod array with typical Pressurized Water Reactor rod diameters of 9.49 mm (0.374 in.) and a rod pitch of 12.59 mm (0.496 in.). The heater rods have a top skewed power shape with a peak to average power of 1.5 at the 2.74 m (9 ft.) elevation. The RBHT facility has been designed using prototypical mixing vane spacer grids.

The bundle inlet steam Reynolds number ranged from 2000 to 15,000 with most of the experiments at the lower Reynolds number range. The droplets were injected upward in the center of the sub-channels at the 1.295 m (51 in.) elevation using two or four injection tubes. The injection tubes used a single row, linear hole pattern of four holes per sub-channel and four sub-channels per tube in the center of the bundle. One additional hole was located at the center of the rod gap location to minimize the chance of local boiling in the injection tube. The hole sizes used were 0.381 mm (0.015 in.) and 0.254 mm (0.01 in.). The injection tubes were bench tested before the bundle tests to optimize the performance of the liquid jets such that the injected droplets would flow upwards in the center of the sub-channel. The droplet sizes issuing from the holes were also measured. The selected hole sizes would produce drops that were typical of the drop sizes observed in the RBHT and FLECHT-SEASET reflood experiments.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OFA MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 02-4345



# 
L EONARDA. B ANKS ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge.

(CR-00-42) Submitted: September 23, 2002 Decided: February 7, 2003 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Cristin K. Bauby, MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Robert E. Trono, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM: Leonard A. Banks was initially convicted to eighty-seven months incarceration for possession with intent to distribute eighty-four grams of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B)(iii) (2000). Banks appealed, and the Government cross-appealed. OnBanks’ prior appeal, we affirmed his conviction but vacated his sentence and remanded for resentencing. Banks was resentenced to 135 months incarceration, 5 years supervised release, and a $100 special assessment. Banks appeals, raising three issues. First, Banks argues his 135 month sentence is erroneous under Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). We review this claim for harmless error. United State v. Stokes , 261 F.3d 496, 499 (4th Cir. 2001). This claim is meritless. Banks cannot establish his 135 month sentence violates Apprendi . 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B)-(C) (2000); United States v. Promise , 255 F.3d 150, 152 (4th Cir. 2001) (en banc), cert. denied , __ U.S. __, 122 S. Ct. 2296 (2002); United States v. Angle , 254 F.3d 514, 518 (4th Cir. 2001) (en banc); United States v. Kinter , 235 F.3d 192, 201 (4th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 532 U.S. 937 (2001). Second, Banks argues the evidence was insufficient to establish his liability for eighty-four grams of cocaine base by challenging the credibility of a Government witness. We review this claim for clear error. United States v. Anjou , 16 F.3d 604, 614 (4th Cir. 1994). This claim is meritless. Witness credibility is not subject to appellate review. United States v. Saunders , 886 F.2d 56, 60 (4th Cir. 1989). Third, Banks argues the district court erred in allegedly denying his motion for new counsel. Because Banks failed to renew his objection when given an opportunity to do so at his resentencing hearing, we review his claim for plain error. United States v. Bollin , 264 F.3d 391, 419-20 & n.20 (2001). Banks has not demonstrated that the retention of his counsel affected the outcome of the proceedings in any way; the claim is therefore meritless. United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 734 (1993). 2 U NITED S TATES v. B ANKSAccordingly, we affirm Banks’ conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 3 U NITED S TATES v. B ANKS
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-11232 Summary Calendar

In the Matter of: ALAN LESLIE HIMBER,

Debtor.

ALAN LESLIE HIMBER,
Appellant,

VERSUS

THOMAS D. POWERS; N.B.H. LIQUIDATING TRUST; R. CARTER PATE,
Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas

(3:96-CV-1719-T) May 8, 1997

Before JONES, DeMOSS, and PARKER.

PER CURIAM: *
Appellant Alan Leslie Himber (“Himber”) appeals the district

court’s dismissal of his a ppeal from the bankruptcy court’s2

settlement approval. The district court dismissed Himber’s appeal

b ecause (1) Himber failed to provide the court with all of the

items designated as part of the record on appeal thus presenting a

deficient record in violation of Bankruptcy Rule 8006, and (2)

Himber did not timely file his appellate brief, in violation of
Bankruptcy Rule 8009. We review such decisions for an abuse of

discretion. I n re Braniff Airways, Inc. , 774 F.2d 1303, 1304-05

(5th Cir. 1985). After having reviewed the record and the parties’
arguments, we fail to see any abuse of discretion by the district

court in its decision to dismiss Himber’s appeal and we AFFIRM the

district court.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1274 

To amend the National Energy Conservation Policy Act to authorize Federal 

agencies to enter into long-term contracts for the acquisition of energy. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 11, 2015 

Ms. HIRONO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the National Energy Conservation Policy Act to 

authorize Federal agencies to enter into long-term contracts for the acquisition of energy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONTRACTS FOR FEDERAL PURCHASES OF EN4 ERGY. 

5 Part 3 of title V of the National Energy Conservation 

6 Policy Act is amended by adding after section 553 (42 

7 U.S.C. 8259b) the following: 

8 ‘‘SEC. 554. LONG-TERM CONTRACTS FOR ENERGY. 

9 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 

10 501(b)(1)(B) of title 40, United States Code, a contract 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1274 IS

1 for the acquisition of renewable energy or energy from co2 generation facilities for the Federal Government may be 

3 made for a period not to exceed 30 years. 

4 ‘‘(b) STANDARDIZED ENERGY PURCHASE AGREE5 MENT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of enact6 ment of this section, the Secretary, acting through the 

7 Federal Energy Management Program, shall publish a 

8 standardized energy purchase agreement setting forth 

9 commercial terms and conditions that agencies may use 

10 to acquire renewable energy or energy from cogeneration 

11 facilities. 

12 ‘‘(c) TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.—The Secretary shall 

13 provide technical assistance to assist agencies in imple14 menting this section.’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                   Exhibit 20

                             OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


  Harry Puglisi, Treasurer of Trans-World Insurance Company d/b/a Educaid (the
"Servicer"), in accordance with Section 4.8 of  The Sale and Servicing Agreement
(the "Agreement") dated as of March 27, 1996  wherein Trans-World Insurance
Company d/b/a Educaid is the "Servicer" states the following:

       (i)    the Servicer has fully complied with the provisions of Articles IV
and VII;

       (ii)   the Claims Administrator has fully complied with Section 7.1;

       (iii)   a review of the activities of the Servicer during 1996 and of its
performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision;  and

       (iv)   to the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout 1996 and there has
been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.


                            TRANS-WORLD INSURANCE COMPANY
                            d/b/a  EDUCAID


                        by: /s/  Harry Puglisi
                            ------------------
                            Harry Puglisi
                            Treasurer
Exhibit 32


       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Form 20-F annual report of SGL Carbon AG (the
    "Company") for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the
    Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "annual
    report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant
    to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
    belief, that:

    1. the annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
    or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2. the information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

<S>                                        <C>
                         /s/ Robert J. Koehler
               -------------------------------
                             Robert J. Koehler

           Chairman of the Board of Management




                             /s/ Sten Daugaard
               -------------------------------
                                 Sten Daugaard
             Member of the Board of Management
</TABLE>
    Date: April 28, 2006