alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer



I, Shelby W. Bonnie, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of CNET Networks, Inc. (CNET);

2.	Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of CNET as of and for the periods presented in this annual report;

4.	CNET's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for CNET and
have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
related to CNET, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of CNET's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date
within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and

c)	Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5.	CNET's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,
to CNET's auditors and the audit committee of CNET's board of directors:

a)	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could
adversely affect CNET's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified for CNET's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in CNET's internal controls; and

6.	CNET's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there
were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





March 19, 2003







/s/Shelby W. Bonnie			 Shelby W. Bonnie
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer



---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE HOUSTON EXPLORATION COMPANY SET FORTH IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,851
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,845
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        992
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,612
<PP&E>                                         535,628
<DEPRECIATION>                                 176,504
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 401,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,660
<BONDS>                                         65,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           233
<OTHER-SE>                                     233,067
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   401,285
<SALES>                                         64,864
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,904
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,182
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,875
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,847
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,205
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,642
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,642
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49
        

</TABLE>
AAM-10-039-E 

November 16, 2003 

 Exemption No. 9963 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-0991 

Mr. Christopher J. Siderwicz 

President 

The Mills Air Service, Inc. 

1000 Race Lane 

Marstons Mills, MA 02648 

Dear Mr. Siderwicz: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated October 15, 2009, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of The Mills Air Service, Inc. (Mills Air Service), for an exemption from part 120 

of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow 

Mills Air Service, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its 

safety-sensitive employees under one testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Mills Air Service. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into 

one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant 

of exemption; 

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant The Mills Air Service, Inc. an exemption from part 120 to 

the extent necessary to allow Mills Air Service, which is operating under separate parts of the 

regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the 

conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Mills Air Service are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at 

all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the Mills Air Service part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on November 30, 2011, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Frederick E. Tilton, M.D. 

Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the Unaudited Statements of Operations and Accumulated
Deficit for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 1996 and the
Unaudited Balance Sheet at September 30, 1996 and is qualified in
its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         120,930
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  328,876
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    121,243
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               572,362
<PP&E>                                         390,150
<DEPRECIATION>                                 376,914
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 585,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,237
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,000
<COMMON>                                       122,024
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   585,598
<SALES>                                        802,890
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               806,720
<CGS>                                          613,259
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  822,303
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,378
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,327
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (51,288)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (51,288)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (51,288)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (51,288)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN SUCH
REPORT.
</LEGEND>



<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>            JUN-30-2000

<CASH>                           6,355,201
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                       29,704
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 6,384,905
<PP&E>                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   6,384,905
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               22,165
<BONDS>                               0
<COMMON>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                       6,362,740
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     6,384,905
<SALES>                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 1,013,582
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   243,717
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    769,865
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                769,865
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                       769,865
<EPS-BASIC>                         5.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                         5.38




</TABLE>
----

(2004/C 78 E/0595)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3477/03

by Baroness Sarah Ludford (ELDR) to the Commission

(24 November 2003)

Subject:   Women in prison

Can the Commission supply details of the number of women currently in prison in each European Union Member State?

Can the Commission provide a total number of mothers with dependent children in prison in each European Union Member State?

What percentage of the total prison population do women constitute in each European Member State?

Per capita of the population, can the Commission list which Member States have the most women in prison in the European Union?

What is the most common offence committed by women imprisoned in each European Union Member State?

How do all the above contrast with the male prison population in each European Member State?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(27 January 2004)

The Commission does not have the statistics to give the Honourable Member an appropriate reply to her written question.

The Commission has obtained a number of statistical data on the prison population in the Member States and in the Accession Countries in the context of the preparation of two Green Papers, one on possible measures to be taken at Union level for safeguarding the rights of individuals in pre-trial detention and alternatives to such detention and a second on the approximation, recognition and enforcement of criminal sanctions in the Union.

At the request of the Italian Presidency, the Commission sent a questionnaire to the Member States, wherein they were asked to provide statistical data on their total prison population: They were invited to provide figures on people in pre-trial detention and convicted prisoners. Additionally, they were asked to supply — in each case — statistics for nationals and non-nationals and amongst the non-nationals, between those of other Member States, those of the Accession Countries and those of third countries. Questions regarding the number of female prisoners etc. did not enter into the scope of that questionnaire (as it does not have any relevance for the two above-mentioned Green Papers) and it is not the intention of the Commission to obtain information on this particular issue.

----
### Good Neighbor Environmental Board

May 25 , 2010 Dear friends and colleagues, The Good Neighbor Environmental Board (GNEB) will issue its thirteenth report, entitled A Blueprint for Action on the US

- Mexico Border , on June 17, at the Woodrow Wils on Center in Washington, DC. We would be honored if you would join our distinguished speakers and other guests at this event, which is cosponsored with the Wilson Center’s Mexico Institute. GNEB is an independent advisory committee that reports to the Pr esident and Congress on environmental issues along the U.S.

– Mexico border. In this report, the Board responds to the charge set by the Council on Environmental Quality to develop actionable recommendations on a wide range of environmental issues. An agend a for the event is attached. Thursday, June 17, 3:0 0
- 5:3 0 p.m. Fifth

- floor conference room Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washingto n, DC 20004 Please RSVP b y June 11 by emailing Ann

- Marie Gantner at: Gantner. Ann
- Marie@epa.gov, or by calling (202) 564

-4330. If you have any questions, please contact Dolores Wesson at: wesson.dolores@epa.gov We look forward to your participation.
P aul Ganster Dolores Wesson Andrew Selee Chair Designated Federal Officer Director, Mexico Institute

# G **OOD** 

# N **EIGHBOR** 

# E **NVIRONMENTAL** 

# B **OARD F**  **IFTH -**  **FLOOR CONFERENCE ROO M**  **W OODROW**  **W ILSON**  **I NTERNATIONAL**  **C ENTER FOR**  **S CHOLARS**  Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center

One Woodrow

Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 **June 17, 2010 OVERVIEW OF REPORT**  **(3:00 -**  **4:00 PM) Welcome and Introductions**  Dolores Wesson, EPA and Designated Federal Office r, GNEB Paul Ganster, San Diego State University and Chair, GNEB **Council on Environmental Quality** Nancy Sutley, Chair CEQ **Environmental Protection Agency** Michelle DePass, Assistant Administrator, OITA **United States of Mexico** Enrique Escorza, Head of Section Political and Border Affairs **Questions and answers from the press and the public R** **OUNDTABLE D**  **ISCUSSION :**  **A F**  **EDERAL ,**  **S TATE AND**  **L OCAL**  **S TAKEHOLDER**  **P ERSPECTIVE**  **(4:00 -**  **5:30PM) M**  **ODERATOR :**  Duncan Wood, Director , Department of Int ernational Relations, Instituto Tecnólogico Autónomo de México (ITAM); Senior Associate, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS); and Senior Advisor, Renewable Energy Initiative, Woodrow Wilson Center **Departm ent of State, Office of Mexica**  **n Affairs** Russell Frisbie, Washington Liaison, IBWC **Texas Commission on Environm ental Quality**  Steve Niemeyer, Manager for Border Affairs **Gila Resources Information Project, New Mexico** Allyson Siwik , Executive Director **Sonora Environmental Research Institute, Arizona**  Ann Marie A. Wolf, President **Cam eron County, Texas**  John Wood, County Commissioner, Precinct 2
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER Cause No 01

- 12-00571-CV, In re Ronald Castillo, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus from Jennene Kemp, individually and as next friend of JL.K., a minor v. Ronald R. Castillo & Porter Athletic Equipment Co. , No. 65459, in the 149th Judicial District Court of Brazoria County, Texas, the Hon. Terri Holder, presiding. On June 21, 2012, relator, Ronald Castillo , petitioned for a writ of mandamus . It is ordered that the response ofthe real party in interest, ifany, is due Thursday, July 12, 2012. It is so ORDERED. Judge ' s signature: 

### Is/Evelyn V. Keyes Acting individually

Date: June 22, 2012
'r.. 

(-- ; 

- ')4 

_, 

USCIB: 10./9 

12 April 1954 

M:EMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: COMINT Collaboration with Australia. 

Reference: USCIB 10./7 dated 18 December 1953. 

The enclosure is circulated for information in connection with the 

reference at the suggestion of the National Security Agency Member. 

Enclosure 

Copy of NSA serial 000169--S dtd 8 Apr 1954. 

USCIB: 10./9 

TOPSgctlET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-11-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

Serial: 000169-S 

8 APR 1954 

'P9P 8!0Ri!ff 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, USCIB 

SUBJECT: Melbourne Tripartite Conference 

· 1. Reference is made to USCIB 10./7, dated 18 December 1953, 

which contains notificatiQn to the members of USCIB that the Board 

has approved the Director's report on the Melbourne Tripartite 

Conference (September 1953). EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

2. On 5 April 1954, SBLO teJ,.fm.t:u:m.ed...J:i........z:.enJ:~m;t.a:t.:i-UQ.....Q:t:~----, 

this A enc and notified him that 

3. It is requested that the foregoing be furnished to the 

members of USCIB for their information. 

FOR THE DIRECTOR: 

(Signed) 

D. M. AGNEW 

Captain, US Navy 

Deputy Chief of Staff 

Enclosure with USCIB 10./9 dtd 12 Apr 1954. 

T&.P S:SCRBT
99-915.

#### State v. Franco.

Madison App. No. CA97-08-035. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# First Latina Black Hawk helicopter pilot carries message of strength through diversity, equality

By StaffNational Reconnaissance Office

                CHANTILLY, Va.  –              
Chantilly, Va. (Oct. 10, 2019) - The first Latina Black Hawk helicopter pilot spoke to the National Reconnaissance Office at their headquarters here Wednesday and her message was as clear as it was simple: dignity and respect bring about strength and success.

Army Lieutenant Colonel Marisol Chalas is the first Latina Black Hawk helicopter pilot and daughter of Dominican Republic immigrants. With three decades of honorable service, Chalas has continually served in positions of leadership giving her a unique perspective on the benefits of equality and inclusion. She spoke about the tremendous contributions made by Hispanic Americans to the United States.

“Hispanic Americans make up the blueprint of a diverse and unique culture,” said Chalas. “They have often made gut-wrenching sacrifices, faced isolation, experienced persecution, and dealt with discrimination, all to make a new life for themselves and their families.” 

Chalas, the current legislative assistant to the Vice Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army touted Hispanic Americans’ tireless efforts to chase the American Dream by using the past to influence the future.  

“[Hispanic American] contributions not only add to the diversity of this nation but also strengthen the American culture,” she said.  

Speaking about the heroic sacrifices of Hispanic American service members, Chalas spoke of the 65th Infantry Regiment, which was nicknamed ‘The Borinqueneers’ from the original Taino name of the island Borinquen.  The unit was predominantly a Puerto Rican regiment of the United States Army that fought during both World Wars and the Korean War as the only active duty segregated Hispanic military unit.  These soldiers not only faced segregation and discrimination, but were also awarded far too late for their courage, valor, and sacrifice in combat.  Chalas entreated the audience to remember these Americans when the audience honors past American heroes.

With regard to her personal journey as a Hispanic American, Chalas attributed her success to the influence and support of her family, friends, and mentors.  She is a proud Hispanic American who has achieved the American Dream.

As she parted, Chalas left the audience with a challenge.  She asked the NRO workforce to be leaders in their communities and to take charge of their lives and give back to those around them through volunteering, mentoring, and coaching.

“We are stronger because of diversity,” said Chalas. “We must strive for equality.” 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
REF ID:A58191 

TOP SECRET • 

USCIB: S.1/2 

2 June 1954 

'lOi' 81QREq! 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF uscm: 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Reloc.·aj.ion of DIF Station (USM-60) from U.S. Sector of 

Berlin! ...._~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

USCIB 8.1/1 dated 14 May 1954. 

l. 1ote sheet replies to the reference indicate approval by all memb~rs, subject to the following: 

(a) 

.EO 3 "3 (bJ(2) 

PL g(S::::3€J.,(SO USC 3€l05 

('b) 

CIA Comment: "Approved with the understanding that the 

safeguards for risky situations set forth in Annexure 

B2 to Appendix B will be observed in connection with this 

operation.'' 

OSD Comment: "F'()llowing approval of this item by USCIB 

I ··.. I it is suggest~ ~~at relocation be handled direct~ by the appropriate militacycommanders in Berlin 

as directed by their pa.rent service, i.f c:::::::J has no 

objection. Refe~al to the Joint Chiefs of Staff is not 

believed necessary." 

2. Pursuant to the recommendation contained in paragraph .3 of the 

enclosure with the reference, this office has asked:! ~o request L---....11 approval of this proposal. 

USCIB: 8.1/2 

TOP SECRET