POINT PAPER

ON

DOD/NASA INTERFACE

Following is an overview of the Space Policy Committee and

the Program Review Board.

BACKGROUND 

- The NSC Space Policy Committee is to provide overall national

space policy recommendations for the compatible operation

of the so-called military and civil oriented space programs.

The Committee was established as a standing committee of the

Under Secretaries Committee with the Under Secretary of State

for Political Affairs acting as Chairman. The Assistant

Secretary of Defense, International Security Affairs and the

Director, National Reconnaissance Office are the DOD principals.

- The Program Review Board is to provide a reasonable management of technology and of acquired data between the so-called

military and civil oriented space programs. The Board was

established by agreement between the DOD, NASA and CIA. The

Director of Defense Research and Engineering, the Deputy

Administrator of NASA, the Director, National Reconnaissance

Office and the Deputy Director of CIA for Science and Technology

are the principals. The Board is supported by two working

committees, one for technology oversight and one for data

management oversight.

- The Space Policy Committee is expected to set a broad framework of philosophy so that the technically oriented Program

Review Board can adjudicate problems.

- For the last several years there has been fragmented policy

with regard to U.S. space operations. The State Department

internally has been divided in its perception of the uses of

space. The DOD has had difficulty in the past in bringing

focus to space policy matters, especially the technical and

policy interface.

MASA has undertaken significant steps in both technology and

operational fields to bring its programs closer to the military oriented reconnaissance activities.

NON 11•01111•MPO 011160 WA! •••••••••••441111

MOM MINSUIINPIP • nn•••••110,

CONTRO -7 !

COPY 111ItC0114 a35ES

"ACCT.-OF PAGES
ewe

b04 awe to•

111.04* Cola

NM we • W. NW OW

•

findings an• unreso

NSC for further study.

Issues w orwarded to the

- In our view, both the Policy Committee and the Program Review

Board will serve to keep the NASA activities above board and

reviewed in terms of their impact on the military programs.

THE SPACE POLICY COMMITTEE'

- The Committee has had two working group meetings. The first

meeting raised several issues. Principal among these were

a desire by OMB to conduct a cost analysis of the civil

versus military imaging programs and second a desire on the

part of NSC to examine the prospect of a single national

imaging system. The second meeting was held for the purpose

of criticizing an outline which was promulgated by State and

for assigning inputs to the various member agencies.

- The issues are extremely unfocused at this time. The working

group chairman intends to distribute all the various inputs

and receive personal comment on these prior to another working

group meeting. The swing issue surfaced thus far is the socalled "fact of" issue. At this time, the United States

Government does not acknowledge the satellite reconnaissance

program openly. The Defense Department position is to retain

the current policy, although it would be of some benefit to

the civil agencies to reverse the policy. The original

thrusts of a cost study to examine a potential single imaging

system have been' downplayed. It remains to be seen how the

issues sort themselves out.

- We expect no final conclusion to the initial study before

1% the end of the year. However, the Chairman of the Committee,

Mr. Sisco, desires a meeting of the principals soon.

PROGRAM REVIEW BOARD 

- The Program Review Board principals have held one meeting

althou•h its committees have net fre•uentl to address the
- Other items which will come before the Program Review Board

include the problems associated with frequenc

for sate e u•lin wnl

rd will a ress ember.

CONTROtillt35-75

copy OF

FAGC1r..OF-3- CPCIPS1 LE S

lb •

•

In our view, there needs to be a good interface between the

politically oriented Space Policy Committee and the technig

cally oriented Program Review Board. When policy is required

the Program Review Board mechanism should be in a position to

simplify the issues in a technical sense so that the Space

Policy Committee can properly address the issue.