Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 36 / Tuesday, February 24, 2015 / Notices 9747 

1A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any 

individual Commissioner’s statements will be 

available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s Web site. 

2The Commission has found the responses 

submitted by Insteel Wire Products Company and 

Sumiden Wire Products Corp. to be individually 

adequate. Comments from other interested parties 

will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)). 

conform to the provisions of section 

201.8 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 201.8). 

Section 201.8 and the Commission’s 

Handbook on Filing Procedures require 

that interested parties file documents 

electronically on or before the filing 

deadline and submit eight (8) true paper 

copies by 12:00 p.m. eastern time on the 

next business day. If confidential 

treatment of a document is requested, 

interested parties must file, at the same 

time as the eight paper copies, at least 

four (4) additional true paper copies in 

which the confidential information 

must be deleted (see the following 

paragraph for further information 

regarding confidential business 

information). Persons with questions 

regarding electronic filing should 

contact the Secretary (202–205–2000). 

Any submissions that contain 

confidential business information must 

also conform to the requirements of 

section 201.6 of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

201.6). Section 201.6 of the rules 

requires that the cover of the document 

and the individual pages be clearly 

marked as to whether they are the 

‘‘confidential’’ or ‘‘non-confidential’’ 

version, and that the confidential 

business information is clearly 

identified by means of brackets. All 

written submissions, except for 

confidential business information, will 

be made available for inspection by 

interested parties. 

The Commission intends to publish 

only a public report in this review. 

Consequently, the report that the 

Commission sends to the committees 

will not contain any confidential 

business information. Any confidential 

business information received by the 

Commission in this investigation and 

used in preparing its report will not be 

published in a manner that would 

reveal the operations of the firm 

supplying the information. 

Summaries of Written Submissions: 

The Commission intends to publish 

summaries of the positions of interested 

persons in an appendix to its report. 

Persons wishing to have a summary of 

their position included in the appendix 

should include a summary with their 

written submission. The summary may 

not exceed 500 words, should be in 

MSWord format or a format that can be 

easily converted to MSWord, and 

should not include any confidential 

business information. The summary will 

be published as provided if it meets 

these requirements and is germane to 

the subject matter of the investigation. 

In the appendix the Commission will 

identify the name of the organization 

furnishing the summary, and will 

include a link to the Commission’s 

Electronic Document Information 

System (EDIS) where the full written 

submission can be found. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: February 19, 2015. 

William R. Bishop, 

Supervisory Hearings and Information 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2015–03752 Filed 2–23–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–432 and 731– 

TA–1024–1028 (Second Review) and 

AA1921–188 (Fourth Review)] 

Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire 

Strand From Brazil, India, Japan, 

Korea, Mexico and Thailand; 

Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year 

Reviews 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice of the scheduling of expedited 

reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine 

whether revocation of the antidumping 

duty orders on prestressed concrete 

steel wire strand from Brazil, India, 

Korea, Mexico, and Thailand, and the 

antidumping finding on prestressed 

concrete steel wire strand from Japan, as 

well as revocation of the countervailing 

duty order on prestressed concrete steel 

wire strand from India, would be likely 

to lead to continuation or recurrence of 

material injury within a reasonably 

foreseeable time. For further 

information concerning the conduct of 

these reviews and rules of general 

application, consult the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 

201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 

201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and 

F (19 CFR part 207). 

DATES: Effective Date: February 6, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Keysha Martinez (202–205–2136), Office 

of Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

these reviews may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background. On Friday, February 6, 

2015, the Commission determined that 

for each review, the domestic interested 

party group response to its notice of 

institution (79 FR 65246, November 3, 

2014) of the subject five-year reviews 

was adequate and that the respondent 

interested party group response was 

inadequate. The Commission did not 

find any other circumstances that would 

warrant conducting full reviews.1

Accordingly, the Commission 

determined that it would conduct 

expedited reviews pursuant to section 

751(c)(3) of the Act. 

Staff report. A staff report containing 

information concerning the subject 

matter of the reviews will be placed in 

the nonpublic record on Thursday, 

March 5, 2015, and made available to 

persons on the Administrative 

Protective Order service list for these 

reviews. A public version will be issued 

thereafter, pursuant to section 

207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules. 

Written submissions. As provided in 

section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s 

rules, interested parties that are parties 

to the reviews and that have provided 

individually adequate responses to the 

notice of institution,2 and any party 

other than an interested party to the 

reviews may file written comments with 

the Secretary on what determination the 

Commission should reach in the 

reviews. Comments are due on or before 

Tuesday, March 10, 2015 and may not 

contain new factual information. Any 

person that is neither a party to the fiveyear reviews nor an interested party 

may submit a brief written statement 

(which shall not contain any new 

factual information) pertinent to the 

reviews by Tuesday, March 10, 2015. 

However, should the Department of 

Commerce extend the time limit for its 

completion of the final results of its 

reviews, the deadline for comments 

(which may not contain new factual 

information) on Commerce’s final 

results is three business days after the 

issuance of Commerce’s results. If 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
9748 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 36 / Tuesday, February 24, 2015 / Notices 

comments contain business proprietary 

information (BPI), they must conform 

with the requirements of sections 201.6, 

207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s 

rules. Please be aware that the 

Commission’s rules with respect to 

filing have changed. The most recent 

amendments took effect on July 25, 

2014. See 79 FR 35920 (June 25, 2014), 

and the revised Commission Handbook 

on E-filing, available from the 

Commission’s Web site at http://

edis.usitc.gov. 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the rules, each document 

filed by a party to the reviews must be 

served on all other parties to the reviews 

(as identified by either the public or BPI 

service list), and a certificate of service 

must be timely filed. The Secretary will 

not accept a document for filing without 

a certificate of service. 

Determination. The Commission has 

determined these reviews are 

extraordinarily complicated and 

therefore has determined to exercise its 

authority to extend the review period by 

up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)(B). 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to section 207.62 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

Issued: February 18, 2015. 

By order of the Commission. 

William R. Bishop, 

Supervisory Hearings and Information 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2015–03679 Filed 2–23–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–936] 

Certain Footwear Products; Notice of a 

Commission Determination Not to 

Review Granting New Balance Athletic 

Shoe, Inc.’s Motion To Intervene as a 

Respondent 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 36) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

granting New Balance Athletic Shoe, 

Inc.’s (‘‘New Balance’’) motion to 

intervene as a respondent in the 

investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2310. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on November 17, 2014, based on a 

complaint filed on behalf of Converse 

Inc. (‘‘Converse’’) of North Andover, 

Massachusetts. 79 FR 68482. The 

complaint alleges violations of section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, by reason of 

infringement of certain U.S. Trademark 

Registration Nos.: 4,398,753; 3,258,103; 

and 1,588,960. The complaint further 

alleges violations of section 337 based 

upon unfair competition/false 

designation of origin, common law 

trademark infringement and unfair 

competition, and trademark dilution, 

the threat or effect of which is to destroy 

or substantially injure an industry in the 

United States. The Commission’s notice 

of investigation named several 

respondents. 

On January 12, 2015, non-party New 

Balance of Boston, Massachusetts 

moved to intervene as a respondent in 

the investigation. The Commission 

investigative attorney filed a response in 

support of the motion, and Converse 

filed a response indicating that it did 

not oppose the motion and affirmed that 

intervention would not delay or 

prejudice adjudication of the original 

parties’ rights. Other parties did not 

oppose the motion. 

On January 27, 2015, the ALJ issued 

the subject ID (Order No. 36) granting 

New Balance’s motion to intervene as a 

respondent in the investigation. No 

party petitioned for review of the ID. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part 

210. 

Issued: February 18, 2015. 

By order of the Commission. 

William R. Bishop, 

Supervisory Hearings and Information 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2015–03693 Filed 2–23–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE 

UNITED STATES 

Meeting of the Judicial Conference 

Committee on Rules of Practice and 

Procedure 

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the 

United States, Advisory Committee on 

Rules of Criminal Procedure. 

ACTION: Revised Notice of Open 

Meeting. 

SUMMARY: The March 16–17, 2015 

meeting of the Advisory Committee on 

Rules of Criminal Procedure previously 

scheduled at the Florida A&M 

University College of Law, will now be 

held at the United States Courthouse, 

401 West Central Boulevard, Orlando, 

Florida 32801. The announcement for 

this meeting was previously published 

in 80FR 4592. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rules Committee Support Office, 

Administrative Office of the United 

States Courts, Thurgood Marshall 

Federal Judiciary Building, One 

Columbus Circle NE., Suite 7–240, 

Washington, DC 20544, Telephone (202) 

502–1820. 

Dated: February 19, 2015. 

Julie Wilson, 

Attorney Advisor, Rules Committee Support 

Office. 

[FR Doc. 2015–03724 Filed 2–23–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 2210–55–P 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES