alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         824,064                 508,502
<SECURITIES>                                15,878,220              12,105,330
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,190,847                 732,496
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,008,451                 590,776
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,187,938              12,970,606
<PP&E>                                       8,602,954               9,183,131
<DEPRECIATION>                               (896,171)             (1,832,045)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,420,487              22,510,711
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,565,900               3,225,894
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       132,904                 133,474
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,117,436              16,491,688
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,420,487              22,510,711
<SALES>                                      8,078,781              13,370,476
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,578,781              13,370,476
<CGS>                                        3,479,765               4,722,327
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,479,765               4,722,327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,703,872              11,700,345
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             383,212                 343,927
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,773,366)             (2,527,455)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,773,366)             (2,527,455)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,773,366)             (2,527,455)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.36)                  (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.36)                  (0.19)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          16,345
<SECURITIES>                                     2,564
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,852
<ALLOWANCES>                                       800
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,791
<PP&E>                                          12,087
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,172
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,878
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,823
<BONDS>                                            236
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,792
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,878
<SALES>                                         33,560
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,265
<CGS>                                            1,447
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,163
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,538
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    897
<INCOME-TAX>                                        97
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                800
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
Archived Speeches and Testimony   April 3, 2014 - DNRO Betty Sapp’s Statement for the Record, FY15 HASC-Subcommittee on Strategic Forces Budget Hearing April 25, 2013 - DNRO Betty Sapp Statement for the Record Fiscal Year 2014 National Defense Authorization Budget Request for National Security Space Activities House Armed Services Committee Subcommittee on Strategic Forces March 8, 2012 - PDDNRO Betty Sapp - Statement for the Record before the House Armed Services Committee March 15, 2011 - PDDNRO Betty Sapp - Statement for the Record before the House Armed Services Committee April 21, 2010 - PDDNRO Betty Sapp - Statement for the Record before the House Armed Services Committee March 5, 2008 - DNRO Statement for the Record August 1, 2007 - DNRO Statement for the Record March 16, 2006 - DNRO Statement for the Record February 25, 2004 - Congressional Hearing Testimony for the Undersecretary of the Air Force February 25, 2004 - House Armed Services Subcommittee on Strategic Forces Holds Hearing on FY 2005**Adobe® Reader® is needed to view Adobe PDF files. If you don't already have Adobe Reader installed, you may download the current version at **www.adobe.com**.**
 National Reconnaissance Office

Launch your Career Do Business With Us search Menu

Home
 About
 Careers
 Launches
 Work With Us
 News & Media
 Resourcesfacebook
 twitter
 youtube
 instagram
 linkedinContact Us NRO SealNational Reconnaissance Office

facebook
 twitter
 youtube
 instagram
 linkedinContact Us

Who We Are

Mission Partners & Customers
 Our Leadership
 A Declassified History

Careers

Working at the NRO
 Career Fields
 Job Listings
 Student Opportunities

Launches

Missions
 Launch Vehicles

Do Business With Us

How To Do Business With Us
 Director's Innovation Initiative
 Acquisition Research Center

News & Media

Featured Stories
 Press Releases
 Podcasts
 Speeches and Testimony

Resources

NRO Multimedia
 Request a Speaker



USA FlagAn official website of the United States government. Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil

Policy

Site Policies
 Privacy
 No FEAR Act
 Inspector General
 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
 Accessibility
----

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1040/2006 of 7 July 2006 amending Regulations (EC) No 2204/2002, (EC) No 70/2001 and (EC) No 68/2001 as regards period of application

(Official Journal of the European Union L 187 of 8 July 2006)

The publication of Regulation (EC) No 1040/2006 is considered null and void.

----
### NUMBER 13

- 19

- 00590

- CR



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

JESUS ANGEL REBOLLAR, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 139th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.



## ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on its own motion. The Court, having fully examined

the briefs

, is of the opinion that it needs to directly examine State’s Exhibit 136 (Blue

Shirt). The clerk of the trial court is hereby ORDERED to forward the original State’s2 Exhibit 136 admitted at trial in Cause No. CR

- 1456

- 18

- C to this Court within fifteen days

from the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the

20 th day of Ma y , 202 2

.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ABATEMENT ORDER

Appellate case name: David Lorenza Joyner v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-18-00875-CR

Trial court case number: 1554289

Trial court: 351st District Court of Harris County

Appellant was found guilty of aggravated sexual assault of a child between 

the age of 14 and 17 and sentenced to life imprisonment. Appellant represented 

himself at trial and has filed a pro se motion to waive appellate counsel and represent 

himself on appeal. Appellant’s appointed counsel on appeal subsequently filed a 

motion to abate this appeal for the trial court to conduct a Faretta hearing to 

determine whether appellant’s request to dismiss appointed counsel and proceed pro 

se on appeal is “knowingly and intelligently” made. Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 

806, 835 (1975). Appointed counsel’s motion to abate is GRANTED. Appellant’s 

pro se motion is dismissed as moot.

We abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further 

proceedings. We direct the trial court to conduct a hearing at which appellant, 

appellant’s attorney, and state’s counsel shall be present to determine: (1) whether 

appellant desires to prosecute his appeal; (2) whether appellant wishes to discharge 

his appointed attorney and proceed with his appeal pro se; (3) whether the waiver of 

assistance of counsel is made voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently; (4) whether 

appellant’s decision to proceed pro se is in the best interest of appellant and of the 

State; and (5) whether appellant is fully aware of the dangers and disadvantages of 

self-representation. See Ex Parte Dupuy, 498 S.W.3d 220, 228–29 (Tex. App.—

Houston [14th Dist.] 2016, no pet.).
The court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date no later than 

30 days from the date of this order and notify the parties and the Clerk of this Court 

of such date. The trial court clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record 

containing the trial court’s findings and recommendations with this Court within 30 

days of the date of the hearing. The court reporter is directed to file the reporter’s 

record of the hearing within 30 days of the date of the hearing.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the 

supplemental clerk’s record and the reporter’s record of the hearing are filed in this 

Court. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

 Acting individually 

Date: October 11, 2018
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
netGuru, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
333-29747, 333-72095 and 333-84184) on Form S-8 and in the Registration
Statements (Nos. 333-40564, 333-94921, 333-88887 and 333-84940) on Form S-3 of
netGuru, Inc. of our report dated May 30, 2002, relating to the consolidated
balance sheet of netGuru, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2002, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period
ended March 31, 2002, which report appears in the March 31, 2002 annual report
on Form 10-KSB of netGuru, Inc.

                                                              /s/ KPMG LLP
Orange County, California
June 28, 2002
J-S53041-14

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF 

PENNSYLVANIA 

 Appellee 

v.

ROBERT BEBOUT, 

 Appellant No. 689 WDA 2014 

Appeal from the PCRA Order April 21, 2014

in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County 

Criminal Division at No.: CP-02-CR-0003509-1981 

 

BEFORE: DONOHUE, J., OLSON, J., and PLATT, J.*

 

JUDGMENT ORDER BY PLATT, J.: FILED SEPTEMBER 30, 2014

Appellant, Robert Bebout, appeals from the denial of his fifth Post 

Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) petition. See 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9541–9546. A 

jury convicted him of second degree murder for his admitted strangulation 

and beating of a seven year-old boy after Appellant, then fifteen, had anally 

raped him. (See N.T. Trial, 4/05/82, at 219). He claims relief under Miller 

v. Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012).1

 Commonwealth v. Cunningham, 

____________________________________________ 

*

 Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

1 Miller, supra, held that “mandatory life without parole for those under the 

age of 18 at the time of their crimes violates the Eighth Amendment’s 

prohibition on ‘cruel and unusual punishments.’” Id. at 2460. 
J-S53041-14

- 2 - 

81 A.3d 1 (Pa. 2013), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 2724 (2014), held that Miller

does not apply retroactively in Pennsylvania. We affirm. 

The court properly denied relief.2

 Cunningham controls.3, 4 And we 

have already rejected the argument, asserted here alternatively, (see

Appellant’s Brief, at 19-20), that the habeas corpus statute combined with 

various constitutional provisions, permit review. See Commonwealth v. 

Seskey, 86 A.3d 237, 244 (Pa. Super. 2014). Appellant’s claim that the 

court should have allowed him to amend his PCRA petition to seek habeas 

corpus relief, conceded to be outside the scope of the PCRA, (see

Appellant’s Brief, at 17), is unsupported and legally frivolous. The petition is 

untimely, with no applicable exception for a retroactive constitutional right. 

See 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9545(b)(1)(iii). 

Order affirmed. 

____________________________________________ 

2

“The standard of review for an order denying post-conviction relief is 

limited to whether the record supports the PCRA court’s determination, and 

whether that decision is free of legal error.” Commonwealth v. Johnson, 

945 A.2d 185, 188 (Pa. Super. 2008), appeal denied, 956 A.2d 433 (Pa. 

2008) (citation omitted). 

3

“[N]othing in [a]ppellant]’s arguments persuades us that Miller's

proscription of the imposition of mandatory life-without-parole sentences 

upon offenders under the age of eighteen at the time their crimes were 

committed must be extended to those whose judgments of sentence were 

final as of the time of Miller's announcement.” Cunningham, supra at 11. 

4

 The argument that the PCRA court should have stayed proceedings until 

the Unites States Supreme Court ruled on Cunningham, (see Appellant’s 

Brief, at 16), is moot. The Supreme Court denied certiorari on June 9, 2014. 
J-S53041-14

- 3 - 

Judgment Entered. 

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. 

Prothonotary 

Date: 9/30/2014
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in this registration statement of our report dated January 26, 1999
included in Davox Corporation's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998
and to all references to our Firm included in this registration statement.

                            /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
                            ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP









Boston, Massachusetts
July 20, 1999
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2012 - 0327 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM125AD DC10 - 53 - 111 IN 02 --- 6/17/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION



The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:



(1)

The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 29, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  August 13, 2008 | /s/ Kenneth W. Brimmer 
|---------------------- | -----------------------
|                       | Chief Executive Officer



|Date:  August 13, 2008 | /s/ Mark Buckrey       
|---------------------- | -----------------------
|                       | Chief Financial Officer
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 8, 2018.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-00838-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.C. AND E.T-T., CHILDREN 

On Appeal from the 312th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2016-30086 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

This is an appeal from a judgment signed September 14, 2018. The record 

reflects the trial court granted a new trial on October 1, 2018. Accordingly, there is 

no longer a final, appealable judgment and this court has no jurisdiction. See 

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (generally, appeals 

may be taken only from final judgments).

On October 17, 2018, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s 

intent to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). 
2

Appellant did not respond to the court’s dismissal letter. 

On October 19, 2018, appellant filed a petition for writ of mandamus asking 

this court to compel the trial court to vacate the order granting new trial. On 

November 6, 2018, this court denied appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus. 

Because appellant has not demonstrated that the court has jurisdiction over 

this appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 

 PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Busby.
Snowy plover nest.

Snowy plover with a broken wing display. Gulf Islands National Seashore 

## Shorebirds

The hurricanes and storms of 20 04 & 2005 changed the barrier islands of Gulf Islands National Seashore. Wh ile most would think hurricanes are purely destructive, this is not so. Sh orebirds that nest in our area, such as least terns and blac k skimmers prefer op en flat beach areas.

Least terns arrive ea ch year in April and begin to nest a short time later. Their nests are simple scrapes in the sa nd. The eggs are well camouflaged. Black skimmers arrive a short time later. Their nests and eggs are larger than the least terns.

These birds become disturbed by humans in their nesting areas and use different strategies to defend their nests. Dive bombing, scurrying back and forth, and feigning a broken wing means you are too close to their nests or chicks. Eggs and chicks are well camouflaged and you may not be able to see them. Eggs left exposed to the elements will not hatch and young chicks need the shelter of their parents to pr otect them from the hot sun.

Visitors are encouraged to leave areas if they find themselves being dive bombed by birds or notice birds ac ting oddly. While most areas are posted with closure signs, some are not. Please leave the area by backPa g e 1 of 2 Gulf Islands National Seashore - Shor ebirds (U.S. National Park Service)

8/17/2011 htt p ://www.n p s. g ov/ g uis/naturescience/shorebirds.htmLeast tern with chick. trackin g alon g the same path you entered by. You can help make the nesting season successful!

Did You Know? Two 19th-century 15-inch Rodman ca nnons are at Gulf Islands National Seashore. The bottle-shaped barrels were cooled from the inside out at the foundry to make them stronger than earlier cannon.

Last Updated: August 08, 2010 at 18:25 MST Pa g e 2 of 2 Gulf Islands National Seashore - Shor ebirds (U.S. National Park Service)

8/17/2011 htt p ://www.n p s. g ov/ g uis/naturescience/shorebirds.htm
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS



I, Kenneth W. Brimmer, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of STEN Corporation (formerly Sterion Incorporated);

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  February 14, 2005 | /s/ Kenneth W. Brimmer 
|------------------------ | -----------------------
|                         | Chief Executive Officer