alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Szymkowski, by next friend, Respondent, vs. Sauter, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Schoets, Williams & Gandrey*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *J. Elmer Lehr*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
First Amendment to Purchase Agreement related to 350 E. Plumeria Building



 Exhibit 10.15 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT 
 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT
(this “Amendment”) is made as of the 6th day of October, 2008, by and between BRE/PLUMERIA L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (“Seller”), and KBS CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company (“Buyer”). In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 RECITALS 
 A. Seller and Buyer are parties to that certain Purchase Agreement dated September 24, 2008 (the
“Purchase Agreement”). All initially-capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Purchase Agreement unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. 
 B. Seller and Buyer have agreed to modify the terms of the Purchase Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and intended to be legally bound, Seller and
Buyer agree as follows: 
 1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are hereby incorporated herein by reference as if the same
were fully set forth herein. 
 2. Due Diligence Period. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Section 4.7 of
the Purchase Agreement, the Due Diligence Period is hereby extended to, and shall expire at, 5:00 p.m. (local time where the Property is located) on October 7, 2008. 
 3. Effectiveness of Agreement. Except as modified by this Amendment, all the terms of the Purchase Agreement are hereby ratified and affirmed, and the same remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

 4. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, and all counterparts together shall be construed as one
document. 
 5. Telecopied Signatures. A counterpart of this Amendment that is signed by one party to this Amendment and
telecopied or electronically delivered via .pdf file to the other party to this Amendment or its counsel (i) shall have the same effect as an original signed counterpart of this Amendment, and (ii) shall be conclusive proof, admissible in
judicial proceedings, of such party’s execution of this Amendment. 
 6. Successors and Assigns. All of the terms and
conditions of this Amendment shall apply to benefit and bind the successors and assigns of the respective parties. 
 [SIGNATURES ON NEXT
PAGE] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Seller and Buyer have entered into this Amendment to Purchase Agreement as of the
date first above stated. 
 “SELLER” 
  

			
	BRE/PLUMERIA L.L.C.,
	a Delaware limited liability company
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Authorized Signatory

	Name:	 	  

	Title:	 	  


 [SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON NEXT PAGE] 







 “BUYER” 
  

			
	KBS CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC,
	a Delaware limited liability company
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Authorized Signatory

	Name:	 	  

	Title:
| 1.   | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,      2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ending June 30, 2008 fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented      and the results of operations of theCompany. |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ John X. Adiletta         |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| John      X. Adiletta        |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer |
| Chief      Financial Officer |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,712
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,012
<ALLOWANCES>                                       735
<INVENTORY>                                     16,238
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,334
<PP&E>                                          24,137
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,734
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,727
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,228
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                      86,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    95,727
<SALES>                                         77,240
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                77,240
<CGS>                                           30,475
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,475
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 280
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,099
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,969
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,130
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,130
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.82


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Al A. Gonsoulin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. (the“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section1350, that: 1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for theperiod covered by such Report.Dated: November 7, 2005         By:                                                /s/ Al A. Gonsoulin    Al A. Gonsoulin    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.2

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement of St. Joseph Capital Corporation on Form S-8 (Registration No.
333-109859) of our report dated February 27, 2002 on the consolidated financial
statements of St. Joseph Capital Corporation, which report is included in the
2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K of St. Joseph Capital Corporation.

                                              /s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
                                              Crowe Chizek and Company LLC

South Bend, Indiana
March 26, 2004

                                       45
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4904

_____________________________

CHRISTOPHER PATRICK TAYLOR,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jennie Kinsey, Judge.

October 7, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, C.J., and WOLF and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
( HAfIID( E 'viAr< 

BYEMAN Approved for Re1eJlgs: 2919/f)5102 C051 06062 I "'I ", .. v .... I 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

111I11I1111i1111I1I1111I"11~llllIlIlllllllllllllll il lllllljllll 14000079620 

August 16, 1968 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 

SUBJECT: Control of Launching Information on NRP Programs 

As a result of several completely unsuccessful attempts to have 

Mr. Florence {AFSDC -S) correct an absolutely ridiculous procedural 

handling of launching information on our program by AFWTR and associated sources -- I resorted to having SAFSP direct SAMSO to categorize 

it as SAR and issue the appropriate guidelines for its control. 

The attached is the result. 

1I11Tlff~111 11111111 11111(11111111111111111111111111111111 

HAN DLE VIA CONTROL NO LV P d3 G / (" yBYEMAN Tap SECRET COpy I OF ___ COPIES 

CONTROL SYSTEM EXCLU DE D FROM AUTOMATIC REG RADIN G P AG£ ___ OF ___ PAGES 

DOD DI RECTI V E 52 0 0.10 DOE S NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 06062 

r 

r 

I 

I 

! 

I 

~ 
Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 06062 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

HEADQUARTERS SPACE AND MISSILE SYST EMS ORGANIZATION (A F SC) 

AF UNIT POST OFFICE, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90045 

REPLY TO 

ATTN OF: SMMIC '(Miller /32534) 

30 July 1968 

nLaunch Information SUBJECT: 

TO: U SMQ 6555th ATW 6594th Instr Sq 

AFETR 

AFWTR 

SMA SMT 6595th ATW 

SME SMU 6596th Instr Sq 

SMK SMV 6594th Spt Gp 

SMO SMY 6594th Test Gp 

1. By direction of the Deputy Commander. SAMSO, for Satellite 

Programsl !certain launch information concerning the 

programs indicated will be categorized as Special Access Required 

(SAR). 

a. Affected Programs: 

846 

770 

989 

467 

698 AJ 

110 

b. Launch information by day, month and year - SECRET-SAR 

Group 3. 

c. Launch information by month and year - SECRET, Group 3. 

2. Launch information will be released only on an ABSOLUTE NEED 

TO KNOW. 

3. An access list of all persons having access to this type of launch 

information will be maintained. 

4. This security guidance will become effective upon receipt of this 

letter. 

ief, Security Police 

USAF 

FOR OFflelAL USE Or~L,( 

(AFR~ Il-30) 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/02 C051 06062 

-
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, A. Ernest Whiton, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of ZOLL Medical Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: December 23, 2004
# C_2005106EN.01001101.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/11

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 18 January 2005

in Case C-325/03 P: José Luis Zuazaga Meabe v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Action for annulment - Inadmissibility because out of time - Appeal manifestly unfounded)

(2005/C 106/20)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Case C-325/03 P: appeal under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice lodged at the Court on 21 July 2003 by José Luis Zuazaga Meabe, residing in Bilbao (Spain), (lawyers: J.A. Calderón Chavero and N. Moya Fernández), the other parties to the proceedings being the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: O. Montalto and I. de Medrano Caballero) — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President of the Chamber, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues and M. Ilešič (Rapporteur), Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an order on 18 January 2005, the operative part of which is as follows

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Zuazaga Meabe shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Zuazaga Meabe shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA.

| 3. | The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 239 of 04.10.2003.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court No. DA 20

- 0399 S TATE OF MONTANA, P laintiff and Appellee,

v. WI LL ARD DEAN M cCAULOU , De fendant and Appellant. O RDER Pursuant to authority g ran ted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time u ntil Jun e 10 , 202 1 to p repare, file and serve the Appellant’s o pening brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 10 2021

05/10/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0399
Order entered February 9, 2023 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-01245-CV 

IN RE ADENIYO OLAOLUWA, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 134th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-09127 

ORDER 

Before Justices Nowell, Goldstein, and Breedlove1

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for 

writ of mandamus. We also LIFT the stay issued by our November 22, 2022 order. 

/s/ MARICELA BREEDLOVE 

 JUSTICE 

1

 The Honorable Justice Lana Myers was originally a member of this panel. The Honorable 

Justice Breedlove succeeded Justice Myers on this panel when her term expired on December 31, 2022.
#### In re Filer *&*Stowell Company and others.

*September 12*—

October *3, 1911.*

*Paul D. Carpenter,*for the petitioners.

Per Curiam.

This is an application by taxpayers for leave to bring an original action in this court against the secretary of state and the members of the Industrial Accident Board, created by ch. 50, Laws of 1911, for the purpose of enjoining the payment of any salaries to the members of said board, on the ground that said ch. 50, 'Known as the Workmen’s Compensation Act, is unconstitutional. An insurmountable objection arises at the threshold of the case. The Industrial Accident Board has ceased to exist; it has been superseded by the Industrial Commission, created by ch. 485, Laws of 1911. This Commission, it appears, is composed of the same persons formerly composing the Industrial Accident Board, but this Commission has many duties to perform in addition to the duties sought to be imposed by the Workmen’s Compensation Act. There is no claim that these other duties are not legal and constitutional duties. Even if the Workmen’s Compensation Act should be held unconstitutional, the right of the members of the Commission to draw their salaries would, not be in any wise affected. It clearly appears, therefore, that there is no ground for a taxpayers’ action in this court, because in no contingency is there any unlawful expenditure of the funds of the state threatened.

Motion denied without costs.
June 6, 2016

Mr. James D. Peters

Unmanned Aircraft Program Design Engineer

Merrill Aviation and Defense

1023 South Wheeler Street

Saginaw, MI 48602

Dear Mr. Peters :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

§ § 61 .113 , 91.119, and 91.151 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains

why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your February 25, 2016 , exemption reque st on behalf of Merrill Aviation and

Defense into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 16

- 4274 ), but we are unable to process your

request any further. The information you sent does no t comply with the requirements of

§ 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of

the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to s ubmitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.2

What Y ou Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brandon Roberts

Manager, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

VINCENT G. WALTON and PAULETTE WALTON

, Appellant s ,

v.

BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 3216

[ March 5, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Robert E. Belanger , Judge; L.T. Case No. 562017CA000093 (H3)

.

Samantha Neides of Loan Lawyers, LLC, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant s

.

Steven J. Brotman and Brendan I. Her bert of Locke Lord LLP, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER
, K LINGENSMITH and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# CE2004078EN.01054701.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/547 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/547

---

(2004/C 78 E/0581)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3433/03

by Mario Borghezio (NI) to the Commission

(18 November 2003)

Subject:   Eurostat scandal — unanswered questions

Subject:

The main tasks of Eurostat include assessing conformity with the Stability Pact and establishing the Member States' contribution to the EU budget. Does the Commission accept Eurostat's conclusions on the economic conditions of the Member States or does it obtain information elsewhere? To what extent has the quality or reliability of Eurostat's work been affected by the recent revelations? What quality controls have been introduced to check the reliability of the data produced by external agencies concerning such sensitive subjects?

Joint answer

to Written Questions E-3416/03, E-3417/03, E-3418/03, E-3419/03, E-3420/03, E-3421/03, E-3422/03, E-3423/03, E-3424/03, E-3425/03, E-3426/03, E-3427/03, E-3428/03, E-3429/03, E-3430/03, E-3431/03, E-3432/03 and E-3433/03

given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(12 January 2004)

(12 January 2004)

The eighteen questions which the Honourable Member raises are connected with the follow-up to the Eurostat case and concern anti-fraud policy political responsibility individual responsibility the information available to the Commission on Eurostat-related matters, questions concerning cases of whistleblowing, Eurostat controls and the quality of Eurostat's work.

When addressing the Conference of Presidents and the Committee on Budgetary Control (Cocobu) on 25 September, and more recently on 18 November before the Committee on Budgetary Control and then the full House in Strasbourg, the President of the Commission set out the Commission's position on all these questions.

In addition, he also provided written answers to the 18 questions put to him after his appearance on 25 September 2003. These answers address in detail the Honourable Member's questions and will be sent direct to the Honourable Member and to Parliament's Secretariat.

---
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Amerex Group, Inc.  (the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter  ended March 31, 2007, I hereby certify solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

 

1. The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date:   June 1, 2007