alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET OF JUNE 30, 1996 AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIODS THEN
ENDED.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,106,372
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,143,442
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,376,986
<PP&E>                                         702,414
<DEPRECIATION>                                 158,613
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,032,042
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,115,460
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     15,000
<COMMON>                                        72,257
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,829,325
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,032,042
<SALES>                                      5,741,591
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,082,198
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,939,780
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             280,504
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,142,418
<INCOME-TAX>                                   330,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   812,418
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.313)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Restated for earnings (loss) per common share computation.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
• . '!"ZP..2

:1 11111

T.2

V••;:i Id.

16 Weber MSS

WINO ACT1D11 VA110. 2

SUILTECT: Terse d hr the Tee 4111ligiMgragbie

PURPOSE

To amiset those mime ad evabaUems esnattal Me. d

prated nth Me 41evelepaat d a saw iiietegachlo

11.111111ribm.

TASK GROUP OBJECTIVES

1. Basal ea eippiteable requinassis, to teems a stdeast et antes reidenesde ter a taw astellite pen•

ad be ad by the system.

To reaommod a bade Aqaba eadlieraltme.

To reeesuard, • the basis of overall at raydraseds ad Mahn eamtraids, the allerts ti he and be selaystea drip sad

some adoetlas.

...!

• • • 4. To lenadate a prelbsbary ander reject pies (Iseledag adadole4 . •

r"!

S. To groyne 'masonry pselisat drostnee.

PROCEDURE •

•

•

1. • ischaleal kwardisa Tort Gam Is kingsby establahal to aansaildt the leniebg ddestbes. nabs amapseed de: Coked Dada Carter, SRO, Chair:mg Mr. Imola Mhos OOP, amber; asd Camel Masa Eh& SA yap, amber.

Mich denies the eseadht bellied

; 77. 7.A.t.7.1i3;

S. rr 7:1;

n •••••••n•••••n•••n • 41•n••••••n••••••••••nn•••••••I

••• raC7+11

°••• 3 

. . •••1.1t,

g %aka

COPY g_OP-......0071,13

026- 4sHandle

tontrel
wo,

,

Central ,5, a,:.

2. The Task Grow win adhere to the following guidellaes sad

sebeddes, developleg additiseal preeederes neeeseery to tie

acideverseat et the stated eideethein

posed

a. ikkraft le t

spates

he D110 tor egproul, within tare weeks, a prostatesment at eparallsol regoireassals and a proposed

beide system eadigeratisa with sepporting Media sod silkiest,.

b. Subs* to the D11110 ter iggawval, Wilda two 'seeks, appreprift

ate directives ad premed orecabersbip ler Seboyabal Task GM'S to

cooduct the source neleettes ovaleetien et major eeersester dolga.

proposals let tlr asset. OM and RV. (liehes The fklosystem Test

Gross ertll be sapeeted to denim the detailed criteria and Needle

pleas ter seem seleaties, and to effitablisb weeessary subordinate

twirled embodies ice.) At least the tellewieg aipsystom peeps

gill be estabibobet

0) Sneer Task The Chabians will

be toodiers track batik

OSP sad SAWSP. Special preavatiens nest be blue by

this group in the preparaties d detailed seem mintier

criteria to take Igo anew* tbe ditlering stages et developmet ammo the camera ceopetitors.

(1) Orbital Central Vehicle Slimpriala Task The

Chat:1nm win be mudded by um, with tewww

asearbers fres bath SAM sod OSP.

(3)_2~R7 %hick ihibetetsaa Task Orem The Chairman MN be by the IMO Miff. Ida apprepriate

simaberehip has both SAISP and OSP.

C. Malt toe DNRO approval, "Ma three weds, a pnttaelearp

master moppet pisa.

d. Submit ter =IRO amoral, rat apprepriate times, necessary

project directives.

C. Written report, will be sObinitted as all d the tosegeing.

Altanader 8. Ms

Diatribetics: • • Director

Noticed itecomais, ems maw

0,11-0SP Play 

Central SAFBP

•

tral

Dirt CIA roc
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

SUSAN K. DOUGHERTY,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D16-4063

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND

JOSEPH P. DOUGHERTY,

Appellees.

________________________________/

Opinion filed May 2, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Brevard County, 

George Paulk, Judge.

Susan K. Dougherty, Miami, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Toni C. Bernstein, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee, Department of 

Revenue.

Jason M. Gordon, Cocoa Beach, for 

Appellee, Joseph P. Dougherty.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). 

SAWAYA, PALMER, and EDWARDS, J.J., concur.
KPMG LLP

Box 104426

777 Dunsmuir Street

Vancouver, BC V7Y 1K3

March 27, 2003

Ladies and Gentlemen

In connection with your consent to the incorporation by reference of your auditors' report into the registration statements (No. 333-64872 and 333-92253) on Form S-8 filed by this Company under the Securities Act of 1933, we affirm to the best of our knowledge and belief that during the period from December 31, 2002, to this date, no events have occurred that would require adjustment to the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002 and for the period from inception on January 3, 1994 to December 31, 2002, or that should be disclosed in order to keep those statements from being misleading. In addition, we affirm to the best of our knowledge and belief that we have made available to you all minutes of the meetings of stockholders, directors, and committees of directors, or summaries of actions of recent meetings for which minutes have not yet been prepared.

Very truly yours

Braintech, Inc.

Owen Jones	Edward White

Chief Executive Officer	Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40064 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus KENNETH WAYNE THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 2:00-CR-25-4

-------------------- August 28, 2002 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Kenneth Wayne Thomas appeals the sentence that he received following his plea of guilty to conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine. He asserts that the four-year term of supervised release that he received was excessive in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), because the indictment did not allege a drug quantity. Because Thomas did not raise his challenge in the district court, review is forNo. 01-40064 -2- plain error. See United States v. Cotton , 122 S. Ct. 1781, 1785 (2002). Because the “essentially uncontroverted” evidence presented during the plea proceedings and in the factual resume supports the higher supervised-release term, no plain error occurred. See id. at 1786-87; United States v. Longoria , ___ F.3d ___, 2002 WL 1497184 at *5 (5th Cir. July 12, 2002, No. 00-50405)(en banc). Consequently, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
CLNINVII0 ST rum • I axerm NON

GOMINAL osewayseationsasouut mcseunve emu LICENIPTION CATS.

co pi y M SOW MI ONNANNTV ON sr MT.

IDEALIST

COW mu. 4111V4-74 27

COPI1COF cop' as

PAGE OF= 'AGES

at NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

• ' OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR

11 April 1974

MEMORANDUM FOR REAR ADMIRAL L. W. MOFFIT

SUBJECT: Navy U-2Rs

Reference our discussion Thursday, 28 March 1974.

For planning purposes, the following are tentative

aircraft numbers and transfer dates of U-2s to be loaned

to the Navy:

Aircraft Number Date

AF #68-10329 (Lockheed #051) 1 July 74

AF #68-10333 (Lockheed #055) 1 October 74

I believe these two aircraft are best suited for your

needs since they are low time and are the least modified

with peculiar mission equipments.

Both aircraft are presently assigned to the CIA's

IDEALIST Program. The actual dates of transfer will depend

upon program termination.

cc: SAF/SS (4,41/11,

4,11111111 1
EXHIBIT 32.2

CALIPER LIFE SCIENCES, INC.  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Caliper Life Sciences, Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter F. McAree, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
certify, pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

By:

/s/ PETER F. MCAREE Peter F. McAree Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date:
March 12, 2010

---



QuickLinks
OFFICE OF .11E DIRECTOR OF DEFENSE RESEARCH At.., 1246INEERING

WEAPONS SYSTEMS EVALUATION GROUP

WASHINGTON 25. D.C.

Log. No. C-61-611

OCT i 0 1961

OMORMINEN

MEMORANDUM FOR THE UNDER SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE

SUBJECT: Access to SAMOS Information by WSEG Personnel

The Joint Chiefs of Staff have directed the Weapons Systems

Evaluation Group to evaluate systems for wartime reconnaissance in

the 1963-1973 time period (DA 709-61, 27 June 61, Secret).

In order for the WSEG study to have a scope as directed, information about the SAMOS system is required.

3. The specific access and information requirements include the

following:

SAMOS system concept as currently held.

Technical details of the system in the R&D and planned

operational phases.

Major technical problems and anticipated operational

problems.

Current status.

e. Access to contractors to discuss the system and see the

hardware.

4. It is requested that the following WSEG personnel be given the

access and information noted:

Dr. Laurence B. Dean, Jr. (TS - 8 Apr 57 - OSD)

Mr. John H. Offutt (TS - 8 May 58 - OSD)

Dr. Ellis L. Rabben (TS - 6 Jan 58 - OSD)

Col. Herbert Rosenthal, USAF (TS - 20 Apr 60 - OSD)

tiuits _t

..z
:4 LP 1.1.0...1 J0141.

Subject : Access to SAMOS Information by WSEG Personnel

It is understood that information obtained by the above will not

be made available to other WSEG personnel, and will not appear in WSEG

reports without prior Mr Force approval. Nevertheless, this information

is needed for realistic appraisals of future system requirements and

capabilities.

The Director of the joint Staff concurs in this request.

2

.

-c-'tn eatth
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
   
  As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use in this
registration statement of our report dated February 9, 1998 (except with
respect to the matters discussed in Notes 3 and 4, as to which the date is
June 29, 1998) included herein and to all references to our Firm included in
this registration statement.     
 
                                          /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
   
December 8, 1998
Exhibit
32.1
 CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Retrospettiva, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the "Report"), I,
Borivoje Vukadinovic, the Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of the Company.
 
 
 Date:   April
15, 2010
 
 
 /s/ Borivoje
Vukadinovic
 Borivoje
Vukadinovic,
 Principal
Executive Officer
 
 
 /s/ Borivoje
Vukadinovic
 Borivoje
Vukadinovic,
 Principal
Financial Officer
#### McKenzie *v.*Ashe.

The Defendant had agreed to run his mare against a horse of the Plaintiff’s and to pay one thousand dollars if lie lost the race, or to pay four hundred dollars if he failed io run at the day and place appointed. His nv.ire became by accident lame before, and continued to^be so on the day of the race, and died in two days after. Two witnesses, the only ones examined to that point, said, that such accident by the rules of racing, could not excuse.the Defendant from the forfeiture.

*Per curiam,*

Whatever the rules of racing decide in such a case, should be the standard of decision now ; the rule of law being, that if he is entitled to the penalty by the rules of racing, he is so by law. The jury were divided, and a juror vvithdrawn.

Note. — Upon enquiry after the trial, several persons well experienced m racing1, gave it as their decided opinion, that no accident whatever could exempt the Defendant from the forfeiture in case of failure, unless he had expressly provided against it by his agreement.

*Note.*— Vide *McKinzie’s Admrs. v. Ashe,*2 *Hay.*161. *Hunter*v. *Ry. num, Ibid.*354.
·Y 

Appr~'(ed for Release: 2018/11/16 C05114896 

\/JI1 "t" "'1"] ~ i-,"\ n £T l!JfJ i lis JJ-V~i 

", 

)$1 NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFiCE 

OFFICE OF THE DIRf;CTOR 

H.ANOt.E VJA. 

MEMORAJ~jbtJM. FOR "l.fR. !\rrTZ:;· 

MR. HEUv1;3 

DFt~· BORNt.G 

TAGBO.:iRD Lr;unch JUly 1,.11)68 

-ch,e' B-5~ rnother air-craft at 1+0,00\) .i:ee~,. l'{~ch. .85, ~-:7\?G ;-.. O~.A.tSt fJ\~l~f l~ :9~5B .. tl~J~' p"roposed aron.e profile Wf~.$ £~pp·rox:ff;':;:t~·e:y 4Gb r~f;1tl,tlca:.l dd~vlrl r0;>r~fre' 

;lnd tl1en irt,to'(J, circ;ular courSe fJ.~OL0a "(1he sh.ip Hfutl~.:(e rr{lc~:~,~Jf at 6.. co~.s~~ar~t. 

3 ~ 25 Mach. Sepf.;ra tion trom tl16 :(i~ch ve~4i~le, OOo3,ter" ~grd. t.:or~, ir~i. tift]. 

clirJlb q.nd G,ccele·ra tioh to 84, 000 ~eet j.r.l,d !~ach ;; .. 4- \-[e'rEt as prof;;-r\Ct:filri0Q.. .Just 

pric<t to SCl-'i"6Q.ll1ed. booster sep<irq.tion.j tb.e droiJ,.~ ~~~O ·~,or:r?le.t:~ 

du.:ring "'Thieh time th,.e booster .:as. Jet ti BOlted. though booster' SB1)£tra t.ioD 

o J,c4r'red on, sched.llle. the drone ,was alri',cst irNeptec, i\lel tanks ~rere ruptured ~d ... :"""l a"nl J .. A~"'..,i...-'f.-.;' t·;:"··~~ .. r.y...-.J....~~ ... < ~'--1..,...;·;", r:.!.,..+,..,'t'>"!.,i.,-·:"!.·f.r\flyol';;;.~"':: an, .. L1J.e..L W w- ..J..,.OSlJ. !l..L ver ~.,IOOS 'c!1' ;.,~~a ... c:.<,.I.J.;~v~; It,Q.'Y (......lQl;.e (1vV~JHpldj,~ ..... _ ___ c.w.lu.. 

reached a level 13.1 ti tude wi thin :fi Vf:;; dGJY',;;,es lat·sral1y but. at too Iowan 

altitude' and air speed to- i eo'n1te "vte ramje~ engine. 

COTIIIntllld ana control '~J'as· E:1lcGG5sfully accoG-plished w-l th hatc.h ej ectioD 

and subsequent drone destruct::. or:. 

Hatch recovery vlaS effected by surfrice vessel. 

p.nalysis of teleIDE;;try data and the recovered aLltopilot reveals a-,;tocilot , . . ~ • ',(>f . . -<- -'l' . 11, • h' ~ ;... ~. 0"" ~, .• ,. • ~ . ~. j., g£t . .l..n was lnsuJ.. l.Clen u l...(.u:rln{~ ltJ e pv.~;'Inov·er l).l.i.clSt l 0fl8 l..c~.'~:r:cn LtO prever10 t..l:1e 

resultant rolling maneuvers. 

Action i$ bein.g tak0l'1 40 corr~G4' tI16 .. autopil.ot deficip:""-4C1 arid the ne}::t 

launch is tentatively scheduled fot Ju1y 24, 1968. 

TAG30ARi:J 3Y2 13216/68 

BYEMAN T6P SE£RET CO?'( J". Of 

PAGf CONTROL 5'(51'("1 0' !?/) " .... ,.F 

7 C,~! '9 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05114896
FOURTH AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE

                           UNITED MERIDIAN CORPORATION
             1994 OUTSIDE DIRECTORS' NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION PLAN

                  WHEREAS,  there is reserved to the Board of  Directors  of the
Company in Section 7 of the United Meridian  Corporation 1994 Outside Directors'
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") the right to amend the Plan;

                  NOW, THEREFORE,  as of the effective date of the Ocean Energy,
Inc. 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

         1.       Section 2 is amended to read as follows:

                  "Notwithstanding  anything  in the  Plan to the  contrary,  no
                  options or other  awards  may be granted  under the Plan on or
                  after the effective date of this Fourth Amendment."

                  Except as amended  by this  Fourth  Amendment,  the Plan shall
                  continue without interruption or change.

                  Dated: March 27, 1998
WO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

r, 

PROGRAMFAITWMIZZT REVIEW 

2 APRIL 1966 

BM 1336, BLDG B NOL PROGRAM CONTROL CENTER 

AGITDA 

Data Retrieval 0330 • 0930 

Wele,hts Review 0930 1045 Mr. Weeks 

Coffee Break 1045 - 1100 

Program Planniwg 1100 - 3.230 Dr. Leonara 

Lunch 1230 - 1400 

Bolos ana Responsibility 3i - 1415 

Contractor's Review 1415 - 1530 

Aerial Recovery 1530 - 1600 Col Hedrick 

Insertion Ship 1630 General Davis 

Executive Session 1630 

NOTE: Latest copy received from SSD. 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

GE-- RESPONSIBILITY 

ORIGINAL TASKS 

• MISSION MODULE STRUCTURE UNCHANGED 

Cr' PART I (DAC RESPONSIBLE FOR CEI PART II AND 

FABRICATION) 

• TRACKING MIRROR DRIVE 

o STRUCTURE GIMBALS, SERVO MOTORS AND CONTROL 

• STRUCTURAL DYNAMIC PERFORMANCE OF MISSION PAYLOAD 

o ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS 

o FURNISH ANALYSIS DATA TO EK 

o PROVIDE EK WITH NECESSARY DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR coA 

• LENS BARRELIMOUNTING 

• MOUNTS AND LOCKS CONNECTING MISSION MODULE STRUCTURE 

AND LENS BARREL 

MOUNTING OF ROSS CORRECTOR BARREL TO PRESSURE 

BULKHEAD (DAC SPECIFIES PRESSURE SEAL 

REQUIREMENTS, EK SPECIFIES FORCE REQUIREMENTS) 

UNCI-IANGEA. 

INCREASED 

NEW 

"7"--96CFLPECIAL HANDLING 

Handle via BYEM 

Control System 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 JK RESPONSIBILITIES 

ORIGINAL TAMS 

• CAMERA OPTICAL ASSEMBLY 

o EK WILL FURNISH DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF STRUCTURE 

(STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS CRITERIA WILL BE FURNISHED 

BY GE) 

o OPTICAL ELEMENTS 

o LOCKS, MOUNTS, AND SERVO ALIGNMENT SYSTEMS FOR OPTICAL 

ELEMENTS I 

RE BUZ ED 

• DYNAMIC OPTICAL PERFORMANCE OF MISSION PAYLOAD REDUCED 

o EK WILL FURNISH ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC OPTICAL PERFORMANCE 

FILM PROCESSER 

• CAMERA AND FILM 

• via SENSOR 

o EK WILL ENSURE OPTICAL PATH FOR SENSOR ( GE WILL 

INTEGRATE ELECTRICALLY) 

---SESSUCILSPECIAS, HANDLING 

UNCHANGED 

UNCHANGED 

e — 

REDUCED 

a AN 

Control System 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 6-ye 43".g7/-44, 

GE RESPONSIBILITIES 

• THERMAL CONTROL OF COA AND TRACKING MIRROR 

o GE WILL PROVIDE INSULATION, HEATERS AND CONTROL 

o (EX WILL SPECIFY REQUIREMENTS AND MAY INSTALL GE 

FURNISHED THERMAL CONTROL SYSTEM ON COA) 

• DATA READOUT 

S 

o EDITING CONSOLE, SCANNER 

• ELECTRICAL POWER AND SIGNAL DISTRIBUTION 

o RECEIVE, CONTROL AND DISTRIBUTE RAW DC POWER 

PRODUCED BY DAC FOR MISSION PAYLOAD USE • 

• ACQUISITION SYSTEM 

o TRACKING SCOPES, DISPLAY. AND CONTROLS 

ORIGINAL TASKS 

INC REAS EL 

REDUCED 

UNCHANGED 

UNCHANCI'D 

; - 

iS 

Control System 

-----S-LaGlitraaPECIAL HANDLING
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 829/2006

of 2 June 2006         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 3 June 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 June 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 2 June 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,212
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  109,962
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,698
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,655
<PP&E>                                       2,535,619
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,357,576
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 288,748
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          514,626
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       799,187
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,065,076)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   288,748
<SALES>                                         69,810
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,064
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,935
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               101,686
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (92,557)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (92,557)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (92,557)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>