alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      15,618,952
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,207,106
<ALLOWANCES>                                    55,000
<INVENTORY>                                    518,858
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,415,470
<PP&E>                                       1,933,920
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,177,362
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,332,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,775,557
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        71,871     
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,332,752
<SALES>                                      2,404,449
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,404,449
<CGS>                                          333,801
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  333,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,582,255
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,016
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                458,377
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   447,377
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

           WRITTEN STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         The undersigned, William C. Gray, is the Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Carver Bancorp (the "Company").

         This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2004 (the "Report").

         By execution of this statement, I certify that:

                A)         the Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                           of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

                B)         the information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company as
                           of the dates and for the periods covered by the
                           Report.

         This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report
so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that
this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended.




         June 27, 2004                                  /s/ William C. Gray
         -------------                                  -------------------
            Dated                                         William C. Gray



* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 701-TA-513 and 731-TA-1249 (Final)] 

# AGENCY:

United States International Trade Commission. 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         February 9, 2015.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Amy Sherman (202-205-3289), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (                        *http://www.usitc.gov*). The public record for these investigations may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at                         *http://edis.usitc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On November 3, 2014, the Commission established a schedule for the conduct of the final phase of the subject investigations (79 FR 75591, December 18, 2014). The hearing scheduled for Tuesday, March 17, 2015 in the referenced investigations is cancelled. Should there be a need to reschedule the hearing, the Commission will provide notice of the new date and time for the hearing. 

For further information concerning these investigations see the Commission's notice cited above and the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207). 

Authority:These investigations are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.21 of the Commission's rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Dated: February 10, 2015. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2015-03104 Filed 2-13-15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
#### Gloria Zammiello, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v Senpike Mall Company, Doing Business as Sangertown Square, Respondent.

[773 NYS2d 634]

*1002Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Anthony F. Shaheen, J.), entered May 1, 2003. The judgment dismissed the complaint, upon a jury verdict, in a personal injury action.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking damages for injuries sustained by Gloria Zammiello (plaintiff) when she fell on a tiled floor in a mall owned by defendant. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict of no cause for action, contending that she was deprived of a fair trial by the cumulative effect of alleged errors by Supreme Court. We affirm. We reject plaintiffs contention that the court improperly limited the testimony of plaintiffs’ expert. “ ‘[O]pinion evidence must be based on facts in the record or personally known to the witness .... [The witness] cannot reach this conclusion by assuming material facts not supported by evidence’ ” *(Hugelmaier v Town of Sweden,*144 AD2d 934, 935 [1988], *lv dismissed*74 NY2d 699 [1989], quoting *Cassano v Hagstrom,*5 NY2d 643, 646 [1959], *rearg denied*6 NY2d 882 [1959]). Here, the testimony of plaintiffs’ expert on the element of causation was without the requisite factual basis and therefore “was ‘too speculative to constitute competent expert proof of causation’ ” *(Pascuzzi v CCI Cos.,*292 AD2d 685, 687 [2002]). In addition, plaintiffs failed to establish precisely where plaintiff fell, and thus the court properly precluded their expert from testifying with respect to the existence of an allegedly dangerous condition.

Also contrary to plaintiffs contention, the court properly allowed defendant to present evidence concerning the lack of prior accidents in the general area where plaintiff fell. That evidence was “admissible to negate negligence because continued use over a long period of time without incident may indicate that the condition has been proven to be adequate or safe” *1003*(Cassar v Central Hudson Gas & Elec. Corp.,*134 AD2d 672, 674 [1987]; *see Orlick v Granit Hotel & Country Club,*30 NY2d 246, 250 [1972]; *see also Thomas v Kendall*[appeal No. 2], 261 AD2d 964, 965 [1999]). Such evidence is admissible where, as here, defendant establishes that the same allegedly dangerous condition had existed for a number of years *(cf. Thomas,*261 AD2d at 965; *Cassar,*134 AD2d at 674). We further reject plaintiff’s contention that the court erred in precluding plaintiffs from presenting evidence of accidents that occurred in other areas of the mall. The evidence presented by defendant concerning the lack of prior accidents was confined to the general area in which plaintiff fell, and thus defendant did not thereby open the door to evidence of accidents occurring in other areas of the mall *(see generally Cassar,*134 AD2d at 674).

We have reviewed plaintiff’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Wisner, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10-QSB AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         119,000
<SECURITIES>                                    33,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,323,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   221,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,115,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,702,000
<PP&E>                                      13,907,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,968,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,562,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,201,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,635,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     346,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,562,000
<SALES>                                     18,285,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,785,000
<CGS>                                       15,125,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,125,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,816,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             566,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                278,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   231,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (103,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (103,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>EPS-PRIMARY AND EPS-DILUTED REPRESENT EARNINGS PER SHARE-BASIC AND EARNINGS 
PER SHARE-DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals2994526-FEB-201308:02 AM
ROBERT CALVIN HAYNES

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 5665

___ __________________________/

Opinion filed November 7, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Gilchrist County

. Stanley H. Griffis, III , Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, A. Victoria Wiggins and Joel Arnold,

Assistant Public Defenders , Tallah assee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., CONCUR.
~-· 

Bo distribution · 

m:cll' 

REF I_D :A66208 

AGO NR: 22383 

PABAPDASB ICXe DQUJIBD 

261923z AUG 54 e~ 

~()U'Jlkli 

·IX 

. . FCB BADll J B WENGER l'ROll V F FBDIIMAB PD BBn:BBDG !O BRDFmG YOU GAVE 

-C<MIAEPS IB CB:iEF RECEft[;f OJI QUCJm BBLIABILl'?X OP COMMOIICATIOIS II . 

. BtJRQPB ~UCJlE PD HA.VE BID tJRABm M UlCAm mPY IB ISA.. nu.s PD. CAR YOU 

SUPPLY COPY 

1f1111am F. Friedman 

S/ABST 

WILLUM F. 1RIEJJWI 

. Special Assistant 

1 l -

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 08-26-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

'I 

I 

I,
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report of Gilla, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Georges Benarroch, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May 14, 2010
By:
/s/ Georges BenarrochGeorges BenarrochActing President & Chief Executive Officer And 
Acting Chief Financial Officer, and principal financial and accounting officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03212]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Inherited Disease Research Access 
Committee.
    Date: March 6, 2015.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Camilla E. Day, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, CIDR, National Human Genome Research Institute, National 
Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4075, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-402-8837, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0764666a6e6b6b662963667e47696e6f29606871"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2241434f4b4e4e430c46435b624c4b4a0c454d54">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 10, 2015.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-03212 Filed 2-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6146** 

JAMES EDWARD BRANDON, JR. , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. ERIC WILSON, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv - 01324

- CMH

- JFA )

Submitted : May 29, 2014 Decided: June 3, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER , Circu it Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. James Edward Brandon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: James Edward Brandon, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his filing as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2012)
. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by d emonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the distric t court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brandon has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
\IRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 40P-S-EMET 

DORIAN 

-MI- NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTR 

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR 

March 13, 1967 

Dear Ed: 

Reference is made to our recent phone conversation 

concerning conduct of a Photographic Intelligence Indoctrination Program for our MOL Astronauts by NPIC. The 

purpose of this letter is to confirm arrangements and 

program content as agreed to last week by personnel of. 

NPIC, the MOL Program Office, and the Special Projects 

Office. 

The arrangements are for the program to commence on 

March 20, 1967, for ten working days for four astronauts, 

followed by a second session starting April 3 for three 

additional astronauts. Additional Air Force personnel 

will attend some of the sessions, their, number to be 

limited under direct control of Major General Evans, the 

Vice Director, MOL. Program content is as indicated in 

the attachment. 

At the request of the Director of NPIC we have been 

working with his Technical Director, He 

proposed that it would be appropriate for a MOL Program 

representative to make some brief introductory remarks 

at - the opening session. We agree and are making arrangements for General Evans to be present and perform this 

task on March 20. 

and other NPIC personnel who have worked 

with MOL Program Office representatives have been very 

helpful in formulating an excellent program. We are 

certain that the NPIC indoctrination will make a very 

significant contribution in preparing the astronauts for 

the vital role they will play in the DORIAN Program. 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN Y 

CONTROL 

DORIAN CONTROL n $YE-52196-67 

COPY el OP COPIES -40P-SEERETEXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING ' 

DOD DIRECTIVE 1500.10 DOES NOT APPLY 

PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES 
rs truly, 

es Q. Reber 

DORIAN HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN TOP SECRET 

CONTROL SYSTEM EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

DOD DIRECTIVE 5200.10 DOES NOT APPLY 

CONTROL NO • BYE-52196-67 

COPY -.3 OF COPIES 

PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES 

RO APPROVED FOR 

ELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

HANDLE VIA 

-f0P-SEOREf- BYEMAN 

DORIAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

We are advised that the program schedule and content 

are satisfactory from an NPIC viewpoint. With your 

approval we would like to make arrangements now for the 

astronauts to be present at NPIC starting March 20, and 

we will continue to work closely with Mr. Lundahl or his 

designee on administrative details. 

Attachment 

NPIC Program Agenda 

Distribution: 

1 Addressee 

2 Mr. Lundahl 

3 Gen. Martin 

4 Gen. Evans 

5 Col. Battle 

Mr. Edward W. Proctor 

Acting Deputy Director 

for Intelligence 

Central Intelligence Agency
Opinion issued August 2 , 201 2

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

NO. 01
- 1 2
- 00 071
- CV

DORIS COLLEN WILLETTS , Appellant

V.
MORRISON O. WILLETTS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 245th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010
- 75588



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Doris Collen Willetts , ha s failed to timely file a brief. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P. 38.6( a ) ( governing time to file brief ) , 38.8(a) ( governing failure of appellant2

to file brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not respond. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).
We dismiss t he appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief.
We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Bland , Massengale , and Brown

.