—FOP-SEORETIGIFCINOFORNHESA—_——

(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

Highlights by Appropriation Account
FY 2007 - FY 2009
This Display is SECRET/NOFORN—

‘(U) All civilian personne! dollara were incorporated in the Personnel EC in FY 2007 and the Enserprise Management EC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CLAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.



(U) Performance Measures !

x)



THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


FOP SECRETHSITIOMNOPORNTZEXT —
ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURE CENTER

(U) The table below displays selected IC-wide measures developed to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of NIP activities for this expenditure
center (EC) in relation to funding and alignment to performance areas. Targets for some measures are under development. The succeeding table
summarizes project-specific past performance information.



TOR SECRETHSITICRIORORN REX ———
(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

Mission System Encryption
Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account
FY 2007 - FY 2009

124 —FOP-BEGRETHOVACINOFORNIESHT—


47 “FOP-SECRETHSIFACINOFORNHIEX4+—


THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


421 FOP-GECRETHSIFKNOFORNIZEX1.


FOP BEORETISHTIUNGFORNHEERT—
(U) DAR RECAP

(U) Acquisition Summary (U) Independent Cost Estimate

(U) The NCG conducted a budget sufficiency review (BSR) of the
program office estimate for this budget.

(U) Major Contractors

* (U) Raytheon, Reston, VA and Garland, TX: Prime contractor.

* (U) Lockheed Martin, Valley Forge, Pa and San Jose, CA:
Subcontractor partner.

347 —FOP-GEGRETIBIFRCINOFORNIES————_——


~-FOP-SEERETHISHTHOINOFORNTESAT——

(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

FY07 FY08

‘(U) Ail civilian personel dollars were incorporated in the Personnel EC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management BC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.
‘(U) MilPers fonding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.

155 —FOR-GECRETHEURHNOFORNH2EK A



150 FOP-BEGRETHOIFINGFORNHES—————


(U) CONTENTS
Page

BOOK 1 BOOK 2

(U) PROGRAM MANAGER’S STATEMENT ............ 1 (U) ENTERPRISE IT... 1... eee ee cence ee eee

(U) OVERVIEW (U) Enterprise IT Systems ........0.00- sce ccc eee e ences
(U) Budget Overview «0.2... 01. ec eee cee cece eee eee e es 5 (U) RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY ..................
(U) Workforce Profile 6... 20. ceeceeeeeeeeeeeen ees 9 (U) Research and Technology ..

(U) COLLECTION AND OPERATIONS ...........----- 1s @) ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT .....
(U) GEOINT EO «0.0... 20sec cece eee eee te eens 19 (U) Enterprise Management ...........00. cece eee eee
/n.............. 35 (O) Facilities and Logistics... 26. cceseeeeeeeeteenee
(U) SIGINT Low 0.0.0.6. e ccc ccc ccee cect eee eee ees 49 aace ON SUMMARY ooocooooccccccceccceeee
(U) SIGINT High .. 00.20... e cece cece ce ee eene eens 65

eats (U) SPECIAL TOPIC
(U) Space Communications ........-....---0eseee ee ees 9
(U) Launch ooo cece cece cece cceeeceeeeeees 1s (0) Constellation Functional Availability .....-..-... +--+
(0) PROCESSING AND EXPLOITATION ...........-.- 143 (U) CONGRESSIONAL REPROGRAMMING ACTIONS .-
(U) GEOINT Stations... 2.0.6.6... cece cee eee eee e eee ee 145, (U) OMB PART SUMMARY ....
(U) SIGINT Stations ........ 06... ccc c eee eee eens 161
(U) GEOINT/SIGINT Integrated Ground
Development, Engineering & Management ............. 175 (U) GLOSSARY... 20... cece ccc eee e eee eee

Page

317

355

371


120

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK






—FOP-SEGCRETHEIHCINOFORNH2E—

(U) RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY EXPENDITURE CENTER

(U) The table below displays selected IC-wide measures developed to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of NIP activities for this expenditure
center (EC) in relation to funding and alignment to performance areas. Targets for some measures are under development. The succeeding table
summarizes project-specific past performance information.



—FOP-SECRETISHTIINOFORNTZSXT—

(U) GEOINT STATIONS
(U) GEOINT GROUND OPERATIONS

_ may not add due to rounding

(U) The GEOINT Ground Operations project includes resources to:

— (U) Military operations.

-— (U) Indications and Warning for impending events.

— (U) Treaty monitoring.

— (U) Weapons of mass destruction monitoring.

— (U) Worldwide disaster support.

—
— (U) Mapping, Charting and Geodesy.

— (U) Tip-off from SIGINT.

— (U) Search and rescue.

ee
TS

153 —FOP-GESRETHONTIOINOFORNHZENt —


(U) This project also includes resources for studies, enhancements,
and other design changes.

(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

dollars are incorporated in the in ‘in the Enterprise Management EC in FY
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable militesy department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.


—FOR-GECRETHEIFKINOFORNREXt——

(U) ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT
(U) FINANCE

‘This Exhibit is SBERETANOPORN-— ‘Totals may not add due to rounding

(U) Description

(U) The Finance project is responsible for NRO funds execution in
accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, timely and
accurate processing of invoices, and preparation of external financial
reports and statements per OMB regulations. In addition, Finance
provides operation, maintenance, and enhancement support for NRO
financial systems including the Integrated Financial Management
System, Budget Analysis Reporting Tool, and the Execution Tool.




—FOP-SECRETISIFRCINOFORNHESH4—

(U) RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY

(U) The Research & Technology Budget Category includes funding for developing new or improved capabilities to expand the effectiveness and
efficiency of the technical means NRO provides IC elements for use in the production of intelligence or in execution of a national security mission.
Budget Category's Expenditure Center (EC) to performance areas, including the National Intelligence Strategy mission objectives.



Headquarters Management (continued)
Highlights

(U) All civilian personnel dollars were incorporated in the Personae BC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management BC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.

274 TOP SECRETHSUTIINOPORNIZSA T—




(U) ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT
(U) SECURITY

‘This Exhibit is SECRET/NOPORN Totals may not add due to rounding

(U) Description

(U/FOUO) The Security project provides common security support
and counterintelligence services to the entire NRO government and
industry population. These services include developing and distributing
security policy guidance, identifying, analyzing, and disseminating
information on terrorist and foreign intelligence service threats;
planning long-range security — initi clearance
investigating, performing

polygraph adjudicating, and
granting NRO accesses; providing physical security of all facilities and
systems (IS); and presi



UGA Processing Development (continued)

Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account

FY 2007 — FY 2009

‘This Display is SECRETVFALENT-KEVHOLEANOFORN.

FY 07 FY FY 09

{U) All coin personne dllars were incorporsed I the Personnel BC in FY 2007 and the Enoryise Management EC in FY 2008 an FY 2009,
budget.

(WU) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department
(U) CLAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.

198 FOP SECRETHSYTIONOPORNIZSXT-


—FOP-SECRETISHFICINOFERNHESA—
(U) FACILITIES AND LOGISTICS EXPENDITURE CENTER
(U) The table below displays selected IC-wide measures developed to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of NIP activities for this expenditure

center (EC) in relation to funding and alignment to performance areas. Targets for these measures are under development. The succeeding table
summarizes project-specific past performance information.



129

Figure 11.


—~“TOP-SECRETISHUTIINOFORNH2ZSX 1
(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 ~ FY 2009

Systems Engineering: GEOINT

Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account

FY 2007 - FY 2009

This Display is SECRETHNOFORN——
Fy07

FY08 FY09

‘W) Han personnel
(Uy MilPes fang it the applicable military

Coe een se NRO bo snoeizol and bageod within the CLAP.
298


FOR GEGRETIELTFHNOFORNAREX 1

(U) LAUNCH
(U) LAUNCH CAPABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE

(U) Description

(U) This project funds the EELV Launch Capability (ELC) contract
to maintain the capability to launch government missions. It is separate
from launch vehicle hardware, which is funded by the EELV Launch
Services contracts. This contract arrangement is necessary because the
robust commercial market envisioned in the original EELV construct in
1998 never materialized and the government is now the primary EELV
customer. The funds in this project support retention of critical skills at
the EELV contractor facilities and at the launch sites, and maintain
Proficiency of the booster contractor workforce.

(U) The landscape of US launch infrastructure changed significantly
in December 2006 when the United Launch Alliance (ULA) was
officially established to merge the launch processes of both
Lockheed-Martin and Boeing into a single joint venture. ULA maintains
both launch vehicle families, Atlas and Delta EELV, in order to
strengthen assured access to space and to provide optimum flexibility

(U) The NRO and the Air Force are full partners in ensuring EELV
launch capability for the nation. The funding request for this project
represents the NRO's 30 percent share of the EELV ELC contract.

135 —TFOP-BEORETHOIFCHINGFORNHES A ——


—FOP-BEORETHGHTONGFORNHESKA—————

(U) GEOINT EO FUNCTIONAL AVAILABILITY

(U) GEOINT EO Functional Availability Mission Statement

(U) GEOINT EO Functional Success Criteria

Se
See

(U) GEOINT EO Vehicle Highlights

oe
——
{Ser
iii
i —_
Te
StF NP)
6
A

357 “FOP-GEGRETVEIRCINGFORNHESKt—


FOP-BECRETHOIFHNEFERNHES Nt ——
(U) ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT

(U) The Enterprise Management and Support Budget Category includes funding for the activities supporting gathering of information by IC elements
and the delivery of information to the appropriate customer for use in the production of intelligence or in execution of a national security mission. The
table below displays the funding contribution of this Budget Category’s Expenditure Centers to performance areas, including NIS mission objectives.



UGA Ground Development (continued)
Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account

FY 2007- FY 2009

This Display is SECRETITALENTREYHOLE/NOFORN

Fy 07 FY 08

(U) All civilian personnel dollars were incorporated in the Personne! EC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.
(VU) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.



—FOP-GEGRETIGHAGANGFORNIESMA———

(U) Acquisition Summary (U) Major Contractors

(U) Independent Cost Estimate

Ts

331 —FOP-GECRETHOIFACINGFORNHRENt————


—FOR-GEGRETHEIFAGINOFORNHRE-

(U) GEOINT/SIGINT INTEGRATED GROUND DEVELOPMENT,
ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURE CENTER

(U) Introduction

(U) The GEOINT/SIGINT Integrated Ground Development,
Enginccting & Management Expenditure Centes (Ground EC) has beet
restructured to support the transition of the current diversified
architecture to a single, integrated architecture focused on providing
multi-INT solutions to This restructure furthers

intelligence
the unification of the NRO Ground EC begun in FY 2008 CBJB.

* (U) Adaptive and responsive tasking, seamless interfaces between
data providers and analysts.

* (U) Information sharing

* (U) Timely responsive production of high-quality intelligence
products and services directly to meet current and future customer

analytic priorities.

(U) To meet these objectives, the NRO UGA will enable:

* (U) Multi-INT, cross-site/cross-system (CS/CS) tasking, cueing,
and ceoperative collection; change detection, data fusion, data
filtering, and data and information access; and global situational
awareness.

© (U) Rapid insertion of technology for interoperability and to keep
pace with evolving targets and threats.

© (U) Insertion of adaptive mission applications by applying
commercial, state-of-the-art information technologies.

(U) Budget Crosswalk

(U) The following table reflects changes in the FY 2009 request from

179 TOP SECRETISUTIOINOPORNIES 1 —


=FOP-GEGRETIGIFTCINGFORNHESN4——

(U) IA—information assurance,

(U) IBS—Integrated Broadcast Service. A complex and dynamic
intelligence dissemination "system of systems" that is a theater-tailored
dissemination architecture with global connectivity using a common
message format in support of current and programmed tactical and
Strategic warfare systems.

(U/POUE) IBS-S—-IBS SIMPLEX. A broadcast communications
system relaying time-critical, tactical intelligence data in near real-time
from national intelligence collection systems.

(U) ICE—independent cost estimates.

(U) IED— improvised explosive device.
a ILV—intermediate launch vehicle.

(U) IMINT—Imagery Intelligence and Geospatial pare

=

(U) IS—information systems.

(U) ISARA—Information Sharing & Routing Architecture. A new
message handling system based on a common core built on emerging
standards (includes XML) that can address current & future
requirements.

(U) ISI—Innovative Solutions Initiative. Classified analog to the
Director's Innovation Initiative.

(U) IV&V—independent validation and verification.

(U) IRD—Joint Requirements Document.

i

(U) KDP—key decision point.

(U) LEO—low earth orbit. An orbital regime between 90-600 nautical
miles characterized by short orbital periods (approximately 90-100

rare ct dat allons fo frcquent vita pet day.

(U) LPE—low power electronics.
(U) LPYLPD—low probability of intercept/low probability of detection.

(U) Mbps—Megabits per second (10° bits per second),
(U) MCCS—Mission Critical Conferencing System. Multi-year project
to provide mission voice services to the NRO.

442 —TOP-SECRETHSITIINOPORNNZSX 1 ——


—FOR-GEGRETIGHTFICNOFORNHESI—

Expenditure Center Performance Sammary: SIGINT High

75 -FOP-BECRETHOIFICINOFORNIES———


Enterprise Management Expenditure Center (continued)
Resource Summary by Project & Appropriation

FY 2007 - FY 2013

This Exhibit is §



(U) Totals may not add due to rounding,


(U) Appropriation Type

(U) Capital Assets and Service Acquisition
(U) Research and Development

(U) Findings

(U//FORO) Finding 1: The purpose of the NRO AS&T Program is
clear and AS&T leadership has ambitious corporate goals that are
aligned with the Programs’ mandate. The AS&T Program addresses
current and relevant technology and intelligence needs. It is not
duplicative of other public or private sector efforts and its outputs reach
the intended beneficiaries. It has no performance limiting design flaws.

(U/FOUO} Finding 3: The Program is generally well managed, and
the leadership is proactive in addressing any identified problems.



(U) Independent Cost Estimate



FOP GEGRETIGHCINGFORNHESt—

(U) GEOINT EO
(U) EO INTEGRATION & SUPPORT

(U) Description

* (U) System trade studies.

* (U) Requirements analysis.

© (U) Prime contractor design evaluation.

* (U) Modeling and simulation.

© (U) Program/business management support.

© (U) Acquisition support activities such as engineering change
proposals and acquisition planning.


THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


FOP SECRETISIFROPNOFERNHESXt —

(U) ENTERPRISE IT SYSTEMS
(U) ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING

‘This Exhibit is SEERETANOFORN——~ ‘Totals may not add due to rounding.

(U) Deseription

(U) The Enterprise Architecture and Planning project provides
resources to support the secure and effective management of NRO IT
resources and the IT workforce. The CIO advises the Director, NRO and
NRO senior managers on all IT-related matters. The CIO develops NRO
IT strategy and policies that incorporate National, IC, Federal, and DoD
guidance into the NRO enterprise IT architecture. The CIO has a
mandate to develop and implement an NRO Information Resources
Management (IRM)Capital Planning and Investment Control (CPIC)
process to govern how the NRO evaluates, selects, acquires, controls,
manages, operates, and maintains IT.


FOP-BECRET/BIFICINOFORNHESH
104




FOR SEGRETHEIFHCINOFORNHES —§

(U) RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY
(U) RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT

(U) Description

(U) The Research & Technology Support project provides system
engineering and infrastructure support to the Director, AS&T for
research and technology activities to include:

© (U) State-of-the-art engineering and scientific analysis.

© (U) Technology analysis and forecasting.

© (U) Contracting, financial, and human resource management.

* (VU) Information Technology.

* (U) Security.

*(U) Computer-aided. design, simulation technology, and

* (U) Graphics production, multimedia products, and administrative

support.

* (U) Technology Forum/Technology Symposium coordination.

© (U) NRO advanced technology programs in partnership with the
Air Force Research Laboratory and the DOE National

251


Facilities (continued)

Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account

FY 2007 - FY 2009

‘This Display is SECRETPTALENT REYHOLE/NOFORN-

(U)All personne dollar are tcorported in the Personnel BC in FY 2007 and FY 2008 snd inthe Enterprise Managemsas EC in FY 2002,

(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.

312 —TOP-SECRETHSITIOINOPORNZ5X 1 ——



FOP -SECRETISHFTOINOPORNG28X1—

(U) RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY
(U) ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT

Totals may not add due to rounding.

(U) Description

(U) The Advanced Technology Development project demonstrates
the utility of new sources and methods to enhance collection capabilities
and deliver timely actionable intelligence. The NRO accomplishes this
through collaboration between Advanced Systems & Technology
Directorate (AS&T) technology teams to determine the best candidates
for demonstration of new concepts and technologies.

* (U) Horizon to horizon coverage.

ear . FOP-OECRETHSUTIOINOFORNZSN T—


165


(U) FY 2005 — 2008 funds mapped to new budget structure.
(U) Totals may not add due to rounding.


THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


TOP SECRETHSHTFRINOFORNIZST———
(U) SIGINT HIGH EXPENDITURE CENTER

SIGINT High Expenditore Center
Resource Summary by Project & Appropriation
~ FY 2013
This Exhibit is SECRETHTALENT KEYHOLE/NOFORN———



~FOP-SEGRETIGIFAGANOFORNHESA——

(U) ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT
(U) EDUCATION & TRAINING

bit is SBOREPINGFORN- “Totals may not add due to rounding
(U) Description
(U) The Education and Training project provides resouroes for NRO
and IC corporate initiatives to improve workforce performance through

training courses, career and professional development programs,
retention initiatives, and exploitation of joint IC training opportunities.




—FOP-CEGRETIGHFCANOFORNHES4———

(U) OPE—operational performance evaluation.
(U) OPELINT—Operational Electronic Intelligence.

TT

(U) OSL—Office of Space Launch.

(U) PART—Program Assessment Rating Tool. OMB managed 8 gnnual
assessment of the performance of programs across the Fe
Government.

(U) PATRIOT—NRO Communications Directorate contract.

(U) PCF—Pacific Communications Facility.

(U) PCS—permanent change of station.

(U) PCT—Pacific Communications Terminal.

(U) PDR—preliminary design review.

(U) Performance Objectives: Future Support - Budgeted activities that
are not providing capebilities in the current budget year (FY 2009), but
will significantly contribute to the outcomes, goals, and initiatives of the
NIS mission objectives once they become operational (¢.g., acquisition
programs, research and technology programs.)

(U) Performance Objectives: Indirect Support - Operational or future
budgeted activities that provide (or will provide) general support for
intelligence activities (e.g. logistics, infrastructure, corporate
Management).

(U) Performance Objectives: Mission Objectives - One of the five
mission objectives included in The National Intelligence Strategy of the
United States of America, October 2005. Mission objectives relate to
our efforts to predict, penetrate, and pre-empt threats to our national

security and to assist all who make and implement US national security
policy, fight our wars, protect our nation, and enforce our laws in the
implementation of national policy goals.

(U) PPA—personal performance assessment.
(U) PR/CSAR—personnel recovery/combat search and rescue.

(U) PROFORMA—weapons related, machine-to-machine signals
intelligence and information.

(U) R/S—Relay Satellite.

(U) RR—1adio frequency or receive facility.
(U) RROC—Rapid Response Operations Center

(U) SAI—SIGINT Application and Integration.

(U) SAP—Systems, Applications, and Products in Data Processing. A
German owned business software firm.

a4 ——TOP'SECRETISUTIINOFORNUIZSXT


(U) All civilian personnel dollars were incorporated in the Personnel EC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.
(U) MilPers funding in within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP



149


eee J
FY 2008 Appropriation te FY 2009 Request by Project
SREREDTALENT- EY HOLE/NOPORN—

‘This Exhibit is



—TOP-SECRETISITHINOPORNH2SNt —
(U) SIGINT HIGH EXPENDITURE CENTER

(U) The table below displays selected IC-wide measures developed to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of NIP activities for this expenditure
center (EC) in relation to funding and alignment to performance areas. Targets for some measures are under development. The succeeding table



(U) GEOINT/SIGINT INTEGRATED GROUND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT
(U) UGA PROCESSING DEVELOPMENT

‘Totals may not add due to rounding

(U) Description

(U) This UGA project supports four core mission segments: SIGINT
Processing, GEOINT Processing, Multi-INT Processing, and ONIR
Developments.

(U) The SIGINT Processing mission segment provides:

(U) In addition, this project: (U) Resources in this segment will:
© (U) Provides multi-INT initiatives that emphasize rapid and flexible
technology insertion to quickly support operational users.

* (U) Supports developmental priorities necessary to respond to
NRO’s IC strategic and tactical user needs.



Systems Engineering: GEOINT (continued)
Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account
FY 2007 - Fy 2009

This Display is SECRETANOFORN:

Fyo7 FY6s 09

han et were incorpa d
(U)MilPer toning ‘within the applicable military department budget
ONS recites weried 0 he NRO but authorised and budgeted within the CIAP.


Resource Exhibit No. 4 (continued) ;

National Reconnaissance

Funds by Expenditure Center & Appropriation Account

FY 2007 - FY 2013

This Exhibit is SECRETHTALENT-KEYHOLEHNOFORN—

48 —FOP-BECRETIGIFACHNOFORNHTESNt—


(U) All civilian personne! dollars were incorporated in the Personnel BC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military budget.
(U) CAAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.

197 — FOR GEGRETHEIFAGINOFORNH2EK4+——.


FOP GEGRETHEIFAGANOFORNHREXt—

(U) FACILITIES AND LOGISTICS
(U) FACILITIES

‘This Exhibit ir SBERETHNOFORN-

(U) Description o(STINF)
Ouse Facies project provides resources to support O&M of
NRO Headquarters (HQ) facilities, provides facility infrastructure
policy and guidance in support of all NRO a ron SRE * (U) Provide timely facility infrastructure support, standards, policy
and mainmans essential leased facilites, and supports| 0 and guidance (to include power and cooling expertise) to the NRO.
(U) The major objectives of the Facilities project are to: @- 5 8 Supp EE and ction
* (U) Operate and maintain NRO HQ facilities and grounds. @: 7% Devin Faces a Facilities vvanaeaent approach that encompasses
(2) + $5 Support NRO EEE facility renovations, modifications, NRO facilities (EEN to include strategic planning, standards
retrofit work, upgrades of facility operations systems and equipment and policy.
(recapitalization), facility engineering, facility
communications/security systems, ing operations,

logistics/warehousi!
property management, Y anliaace with safety and environmental
regulations, and acquisition of supplies and equipment to support
NRO O&M and mission activities, to include partnering with other IC
components.


105 FOR SEGRETHEIFIGINOFORNHREX-


168


TOP SECRETHSITIONOPORNHES
(U) LAUNCH EXPENDITURE CENTER

(U) The table below displays selected IC-wide measures developed to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of NIP activities for this expenditure
center (EC) in relation to funding and alignment to performance areas. The succeeding table summarizes project-specific past performance information.

127 —FOR-BEGRETISIFIGINGFORNH2E4———___—


—TOPSECRETISITROINOFORNIZSRT

(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

Research & Technology Support
Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account

‘(U) All personnel dollars are incorporated in the Persone! BC in FY 2007 and FY 2008 and in the Emterprise Management BC in FY 2009.

{U) MilPecs tunding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.



THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


(U) This project also includes resources for studies, enhancements,
and other design changes.


—FOP-GEGRETIGIFRCINOFORNHESA—

(U) WORKFORCE PROFILE

(0) The NRO is responsible for the develope acquisition, launch
and operation of overhead reconnaissance capabilities that are essential
for US national security. As part of the IC, the NRO plays a primary role
in achieving information superiority for the US government. The
Director of the NRO also serves as the Assistant to the Secretary of the
Air Force (Intelligence Space Technology). As such the Director of the
NRO supports the Secretary of the Air Force in carrying out the DoD
Executive Agent for Space responsibilities.

(U) NRO partners with NGA and NSA to provide

* Global communications.

Signals intelligence and near real-time imagery.

* Critical information to national, military and civil customers.

(U) The NRO is functionally organized around four directorates:
IMINT, SIGINT, Advanced Systems and Technology and
Communications. Each of these directorates is supported by financial
management, contracting. systems engineering, and customer and
mission support. The NRO population consists mainly of civilian and
military personnel belonging to the Air Force, CIA, Navy, Army, NSA,
and a small contingent of officers from other government agencies. The
NRO is unique in that its workforce is supplied by the intelligence and
defense communities. The NRO does not employ its own workforce and
does not directly hire personnel; the NRO budgets for and reimburses
other organizations primarily for civilian assigned personnel. The
workforce charts refer to the NRO authorized civilian positions and does
not include the military or CIA Office of Development and Engineering
(OD&E) positions assigned to the NRO. Following are demographics on
the NRO workforce:

(U) Grade Distribution by Age: The NRO grade distribution is a
Teflection of the technical expertise required to achieve its space mission
with a majority of the workforce residing in the senior grades: GS-13
thru senior executives. Furthermore, the NRO average age is consistent

with the trend in the federal government with NRO employees in the
late-40’s to mid-50’s bracket holding senior ranking positions with 15
plus years of service.

(U) Years to Optional Retirement: As is the case in many federal
organizations, the NRO has a growing number of experienced officers
with or approaching retirement eligibility. Of the NRO current
workforce, 38 percent will be eligible to retire over the next 5 years and
58 percent will be eligible to retire over the next ten years.

(U) Workforce Positions and Attrition Rates: NRP civilian
positions have been stable from FY 2004 through PY 2008; however,
there is a planned increase of 66 civilian positions in FY 2009. The NRO
has historically experienced stable fill rates given its unique staffing
model. This staffing model results in NRO authorized DoD and CIA
civilian employees providing the stability for the workforce while
military members rotate to new assij outside the NRO every
three to four years. The NRO average fill rate is projected to continue at
85 percent due partially to the increase in positions and the ability of
parent organizations to meet these new requirements.

(U) NRP Workforce Positions by Budget Category and Training
Dollars by Budget Categories: The majority of civilian employees
work in mission support occupations, with the remaining civilian
population working in core mission areas: research and
engineering, information technology, and operations, The distribution of
training dollars is proportional to the distribution of the workforce

area/budget category, noting approximately one
third of the training budget within the Enterprise Management and
Support Budget Category directly supports the NRO’s core missions of
acquisition management and system engineering. In addition, parent
organizations provided specific training for their members over and
above what the NRO dollars provided. The NRO has historically
received high marks for its commitment in providing quality training
and educational to meet mission requirements and the
professional needs of its workforce. This emphasis on training and
education will continue with the newly established NRO University

9 TOP SECRETHSITIOINOFORNTZSXT—


324
“FOP-SEORETHSHICINOFORNIZENT —


Resource Exhibit No. 10 [es Y

National Reconnaissance Program
Recap af Roacted FY 2008 A prupriations by Expenditure Center
‘This Exhibit is SRCRET/TALENT-KETHOEEINOFORN-



~FOP-GECRETIGIACNOFORNHES—

(U) To accelerate the delivery and reduce the cost of new satellite
designs, the NRO is increasing the use of commercial off-the-shelf
technology whenever possible. The overarching intent is to maximize
the intelligence value and cost effectiveness of the NRP within a larger
multi-INT, Community-based architectural construct. The NRO is
pursuing these objectives while continuing to meet its baseline
commitments as defined in our Functional Availability requirements.

(U) Currently, the NRO is implementing the internal organizational,
management, and cultural changes to meet the challenges associated
with the vision outlined in the NRO Strategic Framework. Success will
require the NRO to readdress the 40 years of INT-based tradition
embedded within the NRO and the IC. It will require the NRO to rethink
its traditional view of the world. These are significant changes and
success will not come easily or quickly. However, I believe these
changes ate essential and I view them as key underpinnings in the
NRO’s future ability to support IC priorities and initiatives.

(©) Performance Measures

(U) This budget request integrates IC performance plans with the
fequest and includes performance information the IC’s
migration to a complete performance budget by the FY 2010 request.
Detailed performance measures and results are integrated throughout the
request. This request, in concert with the FY 2007 IC Agency Financial

Reports provided in November 2007, and the FY 2007 IC Highlights
reports to be provided under separate cover, meets the requirement for
an annual Performance Accountability Report for the IC. Additionally,
we will publish an FY 2007 NRO Highlights report in February 2008. I
am committed to demonstrating that our resources produce measurable
results.

(U)In the final analysis, NRO on-orbit and ground station
performance is directly linked to the effectiveness of the NRO’s
acquisition processes and the quality of the products delivered from
NRO development efforts. Therefore, acquisition cost, schedule, and
performance measures are key metrics of NRO success. Cost
performance and schedule milestones are indicative of progress during
the development phase, and delivered performance—hardware as well
as software capabilities—ultimately define and limit how well the NRO
is able to perform against IC tasking requirements. Outside factors
occasionally affect NRO's ability to achieve our acquisition cost,
schedule, and performance measures. NRO acquisition measures are
fully defined in its Baseline Agreement and Acquisition Reports which
are developed in collaboration with NRO customers and the Office of
the DNL A subset of these measures is included in this document.

(U) At the architectural-level, NRO performance against IC-level
commitments is reflected in the NRO’s ability to meet its Functional
Availability requirements. Functional Availability requirements are the
basis for all satellite acquisition and replenishment planning.
Performance in this area is driven by NRO, as well as IC controlled
factors and requirements.

(U) Constellation Fragility

2 TOP-SECRETISUTIONOFORNIZSXt —


‘All civilian personnel dotiars were incorporsied in the Persoune! BIC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP,

265 FOP-SECRETHISUTIANOPORNZIX 1



181 —— FOP SECRETISHTIINOFORNIESRT


THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK




‘This Exhibit in SECRETWTALENT KEYMOCEINOPORN

| QUUPOUO) Error in PY 2007 CBSB Vatuc correct value now shown,

column denote the nutsber of programs that
‘met the target, and the total nuanber of programs.



—FOR-SEGRETHGHACINOFORNHESHt————
(U//FEUO) [New] Follow-Up Action 11: Establishing clear cost,
schedule, and performance baselines that describe deliverables and

functionality for the integrated COMM ground system within an
overarching integrated ground architecture construct.

(U/POUO) Follow-Up Action 8: Addressing material weaknesses
and reportable conditions identified in independent audits with a goal of
regaining an unqualified opinion in the FY 2009 audit.

ee

(U) Follow-up Action 9: Using ICEs to help define program budgets.




SIGINT Stations Expenditure Center PC

FY 2008 Appropriation to FY 2609 Request by Project
‘This Exhibit is SECRET/TALENT KEYHOLE/INOFORN

162 ~—FOP-GEGRETHSIFCINGFORNH2EX1


“TOP SHERETHSHTIOMNOFORN/2541—

Expenditure Center Performance Summary: SIGINT High

74 ~TOP-SECRETISUTIINOPORNZSX 1




National Intelligence Program
FY 2009
Congressional Budget Justification
Volume IV
National Reconnaissance Program
ra 28 ae



* (U/POUC} Provide the necessary FEE mit cost and
schedule risk. eae

* (U) Provide the necessary program support to include: systems
engineering, access to technical experts, and associated relay trade



183

GEOINT/SIGINT

Figure 14,

‘many


Resource Exhibit No. 9C aT

Funds by Center, Element
oe wena Program it, & Appropriation Title
This Exhibit is SECRET/TALENT-KEYHOLE/NOFORN-



-FOP-GEORETHGFINGFERNHEENE-
(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 ~ FY 2009

FY 07 FY 08 FY 09

‘(U) All personne! dollars are incorporated in the Personnel EC in FY 2007 and FY 2008 and in the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2009.
(U) MilPexs funding is within the applicable military department budget.

132 TOP GECRETISHTICINOFORNHESNT—


160

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


“FOP-SEORETHOFUNGFORNIEER —§
(U) PROGRAM MANAGER'S STATEMENT

(U) Introduction quickly focus on almost any point on the globe to rapidly respond fo

capability 24 hours per day, seven days per week.

(U) Strategic Direction
CUIROUS) "The NRO is fendemmcazally wansforming: the. wey,

business to more effectively respond to
‘snd improve support to its ct


|

(U) Resources in this segment will:

192


212 FOR GEGRETHSIFGINOFORNHESKA-


National

Resource Exhibit No. 2A (continued) a
Reconnaissance Program

M2 ~TOP-SECRETHISHTFICINOFORNHESRT


—FOP-SECRETISHTIEINGFORNHESXt——§
(U) LOW EARTH ORBIT SIGINT FUNCTIONAL AVAILABILITY

(U) SIGINT LEO Functional Availability Mission Statement {U) Change from FY 2008 CBJB

(U) IOSA LEO Success Criteria

(U) FY 2009 CBJB Functional Availability values are also affected
by decreased launch reliability numbers for the EELV MLV/Centaur
from OSL.

(U) SIGINT LEO Vehicle Highlights


(0) Allcivanperounel dollars wer incerporse nth Pervonne Bi tbe FY 2006 and FY 2007 CBYBs ad aren he Eaters Managemeet BC ne FY 2008 CIB,
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.

110 FOP-BEGRETIGIFHCINGFERNHESIA


FOP-BEGRETIGIFICINOFORNIRE—

(U) GEOINT EO
(U) NEXT GENERATION EO

(©) Description

(U) The Next Generation Electro-optical (NGEO) project provides
resources for:

.

© (U) Concept development for the integrated ground system.
* (U) Associated systems engineering activities.
* (U) Trade studies and analyses.

CSHTRIINGS)



214
—FOP-BEORET/SHTICINGFORNIESH————


THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


TOR SECRETISIKINGRORNHZEXt—
(U) Program/Activity Evaluated in 2005 (U) Activity Funding Level ($M) !

(U) Program: National Reconnaissance Program and NRO
Military Intelligence Program
(U) Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) Program

(WU) Activity Summary/Description

(U) Rating: Moderately Effective



—TORSECRETISIFKINOFORNIZEX——

* (U) Transform information management across the architecture to © (U) Achieve reduction of the total collection requirements requested
enable a single user query to return a streamlined. and simplified by providing needed data which is already available in the inventory.
inventory of all overhead information available on a topic. + (U) Establish metadata based information environment and begin
* (U) Enable increased analyst productivity and enhance response integration needed to provide a single, enterprise-wide cross domain
time by reducing the search time for relevant data and information. information sharing and routing service extensible mark-up language
based transport layer.
(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009
UGA Enterprise
Highlights by Appropriation Account
FY 2067 - FY 2009
This Display is SECRETHTALENT- KE YHOLE/NOFORN:
FY 07 FY 08 FY 09

{G) Allan personne lls wer incorporate Persone! Cin FY 2007 ete meso Management Cn FY 2008 nd FY 20,
(U) MilPers funding in within the applicable military department bedget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.

200 —TOP-SECRET/SUTIINOPORNHESKt—


~FOP- SECRET ISH HCINGFORNHESRE

(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 ~ FY 2009

‘This Display ts SECRET PALENT-KEYHOLE/NOFORN—

(U) All personne! dollars are se fncopord athe Peronnel BC in FY 2007 and FY 208 and nthe Enteric Management Ce FY 209.

(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.

85 —FOP-BEORETIOIFACINOFORNTESt——



FOR SECRETE FGNOFGRNH2EK+—§

FY 2007 NRP Civilian Workforce

Figure 4,



SIGINT Application and Integration (continued)
Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account
FY 2007-FY 2009

(U) All civilian personne! dollars were incorporated in the Persoanel BC in PY 2007 and thc Enterprise Managemeat EC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.





rs

(U) Acquisition Summary (U) Major Contractors

(U) Independent Cost Estimate


SIGINT Ground Operations (continued)
i by Appropriation Account

Budget Highlights

FY 2007 ~ FY 2009

Thia Display is SECRET/TALENT KEY HOLEANOFORN——

Fy 07 FY FY 09

(U) All personnel dollars are incorpormed in the Pertonnel BC in FY 2007 and FY 2008 and in the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2009.

(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.


Security (continued)
Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account

(U) Al cviin penonnel dollars were incorpanted inthe Peonel EC in FY 2007 wd he Eatereiae Management BC in FY 208 nd FY 2009
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.



High-Altitude Integration & Support (continued)
Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account

PY 2007- FY 2009

This Display is SECRETAFALENT-EEYHOLE/NOFORN—

FY 07

(Ur biiben fending le inin the toplicble miiry be

department budget,
(WU) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.

7

-FOP-BECRETIOHONOFORNHESHT—



—FOP-GEGRETHEHFGINOFORNHEEX+ —
(U) ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT
(U) SYSTEMS ENGINEERING: GEOINT

‘This Exhibit is SECRET/NOPORN

(U) Description

(U) The Systems Engineering: GEOINT Project provides systems
integration and architecture systems engineering activities across the
Imagery Systems Acquisition and Operations Directorate (MINT).
Specific activities include:

* (U) Independent assessments and recommendations provided to the

IMINT Director.

*@) Ensesprise-level requirements management, architecture

management, risk management/mitigation, schedule management,

and configuration management.

+ (U) Enterprise-level trade studies supporting requirements and

architecture development and interface definition.

© (U) Enterprise-level modeling and simulation.

*(U) End-to-end integration and test management including

teadiness assessments for the transition and deployment of new

capabilities to operations.

* (U) Studies and analyses addressing protection and survivability.

+ (U) Preparation for and execution of acquisition milestone

decisions for IMINT systems.

‘Totls may not add due to rounding

» (U) Enterprise-level strategic and investment planning, including
technology investment.

* (U) Pre-acquisition architecture support for new programs and
candidate concepts, including requirement definition and concept of
operations studies.
* (U) Enterprise-level ground processing engineering for improving
infraxructe and algeritms fo support development of advanced
imagery products, facilitating value-added upstream processing
capabilities, and developing image formation capabilities of future
systems.
¢(U) Test concept and schedule development for acquisition
initiatives, test planning and execution, to include verification of
requirements and validation of operational concepts and
interoperability.
© (U) Faull lifecycle readiness planning and execution, to include
definition of acquisition readiness schedules and milestones, data
reporting requirements and supporting engineering assessments.

(U) Develop success criteria for determination of initial operational

cavabitites 2nd ful operational capsbiliies forthe enterprise and the
system/sensor level.

* (U) Management of a series of collaborative forums for addressing
and mitigating near- and long-term Enterprise Architecture risk or
issues between NGA and NRO/IMINT.

207 —FOR SEGRETHSITKINOFORNAZEX4-


FOP-SEGRETISHACINOFORNIEEXt—

(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009
UGA Ground Development
Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account
FY 2007 — FY 2009
This Display is SECRETTALENT-KEYHOLR/NOFORN———
FY 07 FY 08 FY 09

(U) All civilian personnel dollara were incorporated in the Personne] EC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management BC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.
(U) MilPors finding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.



Enterprise Management Expenditure Center (continued)
Resource Summary by Project & Appropriation

FY 2007 -— FY 2013

This Exhibit is SECRET/TALENT KE YHOLEANOFORN—



FOP SECRETHISTANGFORNIZS XT ——

(U) ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT
(U) ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT

(U) Description

accuintion The Acquisition Management project includes
support resources for the IMINT, SIGINT, and
Communications (COMM) Directorates. Typical acquisition support
activities in this project include travel, training, awards, front office
operations, financial management, security, and miscellaneous program
support.
(UHPOUWO) In addition to Directorate acquisition suppor, this project
also includes NRO Corporate Systems Integration and Engineering
(SI&E) activities. Resources for SI&E provide support for:

© (UNPOWO) Providing oversight and management of NRO
corporate-level systems engineering processes.

“Toaals may not add due to rounding

* (UNFOUOY Developing and managing an Integrated NRO
Architecture to produce new and innovative solutions that leverage
Mission Partner efforts and build upon multi-INT information.

* (U/FEUO) Implementing effective NRO-level acquisition,
engineering, mission assurance, and industrial base policies,
processes, and initiatives.

* (U/FORO) Informing and providing the technical basis for
enterprise-level programmatic decisions.

* (U/FOUO) Raising the level of systems engineering and program
management expertise across the NRO.

* (U/FOUOY Forming the set of cross-agency mission integration
‘activities which evolve the separate NRP, NGP, CCP, and GDIP
programs in accordance with the DNI’s priorities.


(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

SIGINT Ground Operations
Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account

FY 2007 - FY 2009

‘This Display is SECRETHTALENT- KEYHOLE/NOFORN

7t FOR SECRITHSIINORORNIEX4—

FY 09



—FOP-CEORETHISHAINOFORNHZSHT
(U) Program/Activity Evaluated in 2006 (U) Activity Funding Level ($M) *

(U) Program: National Reconnaissance Program and NRO
Military Intelligence Program
(U) Communications (COMM) Program

(U) Activity Summary/Description

(U) The NRO Communications Program provides the
telecommunications network (space and ground) system arid enterprise
IT services necessary to support the NRO’s development, launch, and .
operation of space reconnaissance systems and other NRO (U) Rating: Moderately Effective
intelligence-related activities. The Program evaluated in the PART
includes the activities of the NRO Communications Systems
Acquisition and Operations Directorate (COMM) and NRO’s joint
responsibilities and interfaces with mission partners and
oversight/policy management organizations.



_——

|

(U) SIGINT Technology

(U) Crosseutting Technology

© (U) Carbon nanotube (CNT) memory/logic, power cables, and

*(U) Radiation hardened analog, mixed signal, and digital
microelectronics.

© (U) Next generation high efficiency solar cells.

* (U) Third generation long duration CNT lithium ion batteries.

* (U) Advances in thermal management for both payload and
computer chips.

* (U) Advanced power electronics.

© (U) Multi-INT ground processing technologies.

* (U) Advanced Futures Lab ground processing and data fusion
technologies.

* (U) Emerging opportunities for technology investment.


“FOP-GEGRETISHACINOFORNHEEKI—

(U) Acquisition Summary (U) Major Contractors

(S777 KT]

(U) Independent Cost Estimate


Expenditure Center Performance Summary: SIGINT High



THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


FOP SECRETHSHTONOFORNHZSNT-

(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

Connectivity

Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account

FY 2007 - FY 2009

This Display is SRCRET/TALENT KETHOLE/NOFORN-

Fy 07 FY 08

((U) All civilian personnel dollars were incorporated in the Personne! BC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.
{U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.

219 “FOP-SEORET/SIFRCINGFORNHESNt—



(U) The table below displays selected IC-wide measures developed to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of NIP activities for this expenditure
center (EC) in relation to funding and alignment to performance areas. The succeeding table summarizes project-specific past performance information.



aaa

182



Connectivity (continued)
Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account
FY 2007 - FY 2009
‘This Display is SECRET/TALENT-KETHOLE/NOFORN
FY 09

(U) Ail civilian personne! dollars were incorporated in the Personnel EC in FY 2007 aad the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.
(VU) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP potitions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.

at —FOP-BEGRETIOIFUINOFORNHESKt—


FOP SEO RETISHFOINGFORNHESK 1
(U) SIGINT LOW EXPENDITURE CENTER

SIGINT Low expen eel & Ay
FY 2007 - FY 20: ad

‘This Exhibit is SECRET/TALENT-KEYHOLE/NOFORN-



—FOP-SECRETHSITIEINOFORNHESH—
(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

(U) All personnel dota ae incopocsed in the Fergal BC in PY 2007 sot FY 2008 sad i he Enterprve Management BC in PY 2009,

(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and bodgeted within the CIAP.

118 —TOR-SECRETISITKINOFORN2Z5X4—_


Expenditure Center Performance Summary: SIGINT Low



——TOP-SECRETHSITIONOPORNNZNT-
(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

SIGINT Application and Integration

Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account

FY 2007 - FY 2009

This Display is SEERETHNOFORN

FY 67 Fy 63 FY 09

(U) All civilian personnel doilars were were incopeeted in the Personne] BC in FY 2007 se the Exerpise Mansgsmeat BC in FY 2008 snd FY 2009.

(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CLAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.



Launch Operations and Engineering (continued)
Budget by Appropriation Account

FY 2007- FY 2009

‘This Display is SECRETHTALENT KEYHOLE/NOFORN

(U) All personnel dollars are incorporated in the Personnel BC in FY 2007 and FY 2008 and in the Enterprise Management BC in FY 2009.
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.

139 —FOR-BEGRETHSIGINOFORNH2EX4—



“TOP SRCRETISUTRINOFORINIZEX 1

(U) FACILITIES AND LOGISTICS
(U) LOGISTICS

‘This Exhibit is SEERETHNOFORN—

(U) Description

(U) The Logistics project provides resources for diverse enterprise
level Support Services and Transportation Management services that
enable the NRO to perform its mission.

(U) Support Services activities include:

* (U) System development and integration, automation upgrades,

O&M, and configuration management of administrative business

services.

* (U) Life cycle information and records management, including

declassification responsibilities under Executive Orders 12958 and

13142,

* (U) NRO environmental, safety, and system safety support;

ive Emergency Management Program, Fire Protection
Program; multimedia and production services; full-service
government travel and accounting; NRO cover and liaison services;

‘Totals may not add due to rounding

library and technical research services; management control,
knowledge management, process reengineering; and fitness and
medical support.

© (U) Reception and Representation funds.
(U) Transportation Management activities include:

SA

© (U) Centralized NRO vehicle program management, including
vehicle leases and procurement.

313 —FOP-GEGRETISITONOFORNIESHA—


SIGINT Low Expenditure Center (continued)
Resource by Project & Appropriation
FY 2007 - FY 20!

This Exhibit is SECRET/TALENT RE YHOLE/NOFORN-

SIGINT Low Expenditure Center
FY 2808 Appropriation to FY 2009 Request by Project
‘This Exhibit fs SECRET/TALENT KEYHOLE/NOFORN-



“TOP SECRETISUTRINOPORNZ5X1———

(U) Appropriation Type
(U) Capital Assets and Service Acquisition

(U) Findings

(U) Finding 1: The purpose of the NRO COMM Program is clear. It
addresses current and relevant needs for communication and IT services;
it is not duplicative of other public or private sector efforts; and its
outputs reach the intended beneficiaries.

elements and output measures and targets for acquisition elements of the
Program. In addition, the Program is developing measures of progress
toward strategic plan objectives, annual schedule Kor mesting Srategic
plan objectives, and alignment of strategic plans, budgets, and

(GOVE) Finding 4: The COMM Program has procedures in place
to measure efficiency and demonstrates improved cost effectiveness in
It has established a clear measure of

(U/FOUO) Finding 5: The space and terrestrial elements of the
Program collaborate and coordinate well with related programs,
pafticularly in day-to-day operations.

(U/PO8S) Finding 6: Timely, quality independent reviews of the
bulk of the COMM Program are available. Many of the reviews indicate
that the Program is performing its mission very well and provides
excellent customer services, others identify issues that could affect, or
have affected, customer satisfaction, network ity, or_other
outcomes |

(U/FOUS) Finding 8: The NRO COMM Program clearly defines
deliverables and regularly collects and uses performance information.
However, the IC needs to improve budget presentation such that
resource needs are well understood and more clearly linked to
performance.

(U/FEUC) 93)


216

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


—FOP-SECRETISITIOINOFERNH2ENT—
(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

‘Systems Engineering: SIGINT

(U) All civilian personnel dollars were ‘were incorporated in the Personnel EC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2008 and FY 2009,

(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CLAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted withia the CIAP



TOP SECRET//SVTK/NOFORN//25X1

pee FT Snaps oie :
FY 2008 Appropriation to FY 2009 Request by Project
‘This Exhibit is

‘Vos? EC_ELTBL.FYO7AppropF'YOtRequestPrej fra

210 “TOP SECRETHSUTHIINOPORN 28% 1




—FOP-CEGRETIGHD .. AOFGRNIBE———

(U) ENTERPRISE IT SYSTEMS
(U) CONNECTIVITY

Exhibit is SBEREANOPORN——

(U) Description

(U) The Connectivity project provides resources to develop, acquire,
deliver, operate, and maintain the NRO’s enterprise information systems
and terrestrial communication networks. These information systems and
networks support the NRO’s mission to provide global communication
services for the NRO, IC mission partners, and the DoD.

(U/IFQUE}-In FY 2009, the enterprise information systems portion
of this project will provide resources to continue to upgrade the
management information systems, message handling capabilities, and

capabilities that_are ._ This

a7 TOP-SEOREHIOFCNOFORNIESH


TOP SECRETISUTRINOFORNITZSXT
(U) GLOSSARY

(U) AGI—Advanced Geospatial Intelligence. (U) BPO—Business Plans and Operations office.
(U) AGP—Advanced GEOINT Processing. Processing of advanced (U) BSR——budget sufficiency review.
seospatial intelligence derived from imagery. (U) C&C—command and control.

(U) CAAS—contracted advisory and assistance services. Services under
contract by non-governmental sources to provide management and
professional support; studies, analyses, and evaluations; or engineering
and technical support.

ii | a

(U) AOCO—Airborne Overhead Cooperative Operations. System that (U) CCAFS—Cape Canaveral Air Force Station.
uses near real-time air and space SIGINT tipping, collection and qu) ccs. lation cali services

processing to geolocate and cross cue targets to imagery.
(0 ARAD road ached dept Te
aa ee (U) CDR—critical design review.

(U) AS&T—Advanced Systems and Technology, NRO directorate. (U) CMA—collection management authority.
Aaee . (U) CNT—carbon nanotube. A one-atom thick sheet of graphite rolled
(U) ASME—Automated Spectrum Monitoring Equipment. up into a seamless cylinder with diameter on the order of a nanometer.

(U) ATM—asynchronous transfer mode. A high-bandwidth method of
transporting information designed to integrate the transport of all
services on a single network.

(U) BAAR—baseline agreement and acquisition report.
(U) BOL—beginning-of-life.

i (U) COMINT—Communications Intelligence.

439 FOP-SECRETISITIONOFORNTZENT —





FOP SECRETS TOINOFORNTEST—

(U) FUNCTIONAL AVAILABILITY AND SATELLITE LIFE ESTIMATES

(U) Background

(U) In 1997, the Mean Mission Duration (MMD) Panel recommended
the development of a standardized process for determining satellite life
and constellation replenishment criteria based on mission satisfaction. In
response, the NRO developed the Functional Availability (FA) process,
which employs a combination of probability theory, manufacturer’s
wear-out data, on-orbit experience, and constellation mission

(U) Functional Availability

(U) Functional Availability is the probability that a constellation of
satellites will meet specific mission requirements at a future point in
time. In addition to estimates for wear-out and random failures of
satellite components, FA depends on assumptions regarding future
events such as the replenishment schedule. Different measures of FA
may be defined for a constellation, corresponding to different missions
of the same constellation.

(U) NRO program offices initiate the FA methodology at the piece
parts reliability level up through the component, subsystem, system, and
satellite, to the constellation level. The data is displayed as a curve that
provides FA as a function of time.

(U) Reliability. A satellite’s reliability is the probability that it will
remain operable and mission worthy at some future point in time, given
everything known about its current status and future
Reliability functions provide this probability as a function of time, and
usually decline continuously. Reliability functions are constructed for

key components that can be aggregated, enabling the construction of
mathematical reliability models, as with FA, for larger systems,

(U) Life Estimates. A satellite’s life estimate is derived from its
reliability function. The satellite’s mean life estimate (MLE), given in
years, represents the expected average life. Typically, a satellite has
about a SO percent chance of operating beyond its current MLE.
Decisionmakers should not use MLE as the sole basis for satellite
replenishment or to justify conclusions about constellation capability.

(U) Risk Management. FA is primarily a risk management tool for
senior leadership in the NRO. FA charts indicate constellation mission
satisfaction over time and illustrate the mission impact of launch
failures, schedule changes, and on-orbit failures. Ideally, the NRO
constellation replenishment plan should ensure that FA levels remain
above minimum thresholds. However, current affordability
considerations do not permit optimal satellite acquisition and launch
phasing.


—FOP-SECRETISIFNGFORNIESt——$
(U) FACILITIES AND LOGISTICS EXPENDITURE CENTER

Facilities & Logistics Expenditure Center J



——FOP-SECRETISIFACNOFORNHZSX1—
(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

() Miben nding i ‘the applicable military departracat budget. .
(WU) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but suthorized and budgeted within the CIAP.



~TOR-GEGRETHSIFFKNOFORNA2EX+—

(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 — FY 2009

(Gil evi promel dlls wor lnerornd i he Perompe] EC i FY 2007 end he Eerie Management Ci FY 2008 x FY 2003.
(U) MilPers fonding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.



130

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


(U/FOUO) Follow-Up Action 2: Developing and implementing

Improving traceability between COMM-level strategic plans and

higher-order plans at the NRO and DNI levels.
* (U/FORBO) (Year Began: 2006. Completed). COMM restructured
Management

its Strategic Process in late FY 2006 and early FY 2007

to strengthen tracking and management of progress in meeting the

objectives established in its annual Strategic Plan. Objectives are
aligned with the NRO Strategic Framework and the NIS. A Business

Plan outlines how project work activities trace to budgets, objectives,

master scheduled items, and architectural artifacts. COMM Senior

Management reviews progress and performance against objectives on

a quarterly basis.

(U//PEBE) Foliow-Up Action 3: Improving traceability between
customers needs, strategic plans, business/operating plans,
requirements, architecture, and budgets. This includes improving
Processes to assure more timely updates of requirements and related
planning documents (architectures, business plans, analyses of
alternatives, etc.) reflect evolving user needs (c.g., next generation
IMINT requirements).

* (U/FOUOy (Year Began: 2006. Completed). COMM restructured

and updated its Integrated COMM Architecture and Requirement

Document (ICARD) to capture capstone requirements, key

functionality-based architectural artifacts from the approved NGCA,

and emerging customer needs. COMM has integrated architecture
and requirements efforts with its Strategic Management process.

(U/QU0} Follow-Up Action 4: Ensuring clear documentation of
approved waivers to published availability goals.

(U/FOUEC) Follow-Up Action 5: Improving coordination with
stakeholders on programmatic decisions West affect cesmssications

(U/FOUO) Follow-up Action 7: Ensuring that acquisition baselines
and performance are adequately and clearly documented in the BAAR,
where BAARs are required, and that BAARs are updated in a timely
manner.

405 —FOP-SEGRETIGIFAMNOFORNAZEX1—___.


—TOP-SECRETISHTHINOPORNHZST —
(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

U personnel do
(G) milfensfuning i win be tplcable ality depemeat budge.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.

14 “FOP-GEGRETIEVCINGFORNHEEMt—


“TOP SECRETHSITIONOFORNTZSXT ———
(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

Headquarters Management

Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account
FY 2007 - FY 2009

‘This Display is SEEREFANOFORN—

(U) All civilian personne! doliars were incorporated in the Persomnel BC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.



—TOR-SECRETISIUINORORNZEXY

(U) SPACE COMMUNICATIONS
(U) MISSION SYSTEM ENCRYPTION

* (U/FOUO) Conduct analysis of vulnerabilities and capabilities of
future communications for both space and terrestrial applications to
forecast future information assurance technologies to include
cryptographic security requirements,

. (U) Focus development and implementation efforts on information

engineering for integration and implementation into the NRO

communications capabilities to support NRO missions and programs.
—(U)Compkte CryptoCore design and initiate CryptoCore
component development for both space and ground, net-centric
enabling solutions.



—“FOP-GECRETIEIHFGNOFORNH25t—

(U) ENTERPRISE IT SYSTEMS EXPENDITURE CENTER

(U) The table below displays selected IC-wide measures developed to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of NIP activities for this expenditure
center (EC) in relation to funding and alignment to performance areas. Targets for some measures are under development, The succeeding table
summarizes project-specific past performance information.

an “FOR-GEGRETIRIFUNOFORNHEKY—


Impect on Performance Areas’/
Plans for Improvement

Performance
Measure
No performance
measures were
used against this
EC prior to
FY 2008.
FY 2007 Results are preliminary.
* Indicates Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) Measure.
** Targets under review.
1 ixctades Omnibus Bridge Funding. if applicable to Program.
a)

Lee a ———————————e —e———eee ae,
3 Performance

This Table is Unclassified/POBO—

128 ——TOP-SEORETHSIFTICONOFORNTESNT


Research & Ex jiture Center (continued)
Techoolony pee

FY 2007 - FY 201.

This Exhibit is

barge ty ploaeer wrth aor penny J
2008 Appropriation to FY 2009 Request by Project
The Exhibe ie



(WU) All civilian persoanel dollars were incorporated in the Personnel BC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management BC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.

(WU) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department badget.
(U) C1AP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.

—FOP-BEGRETIOIFICINOFORN/EEMt———


152

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


Fyo7 Fy0s FY0

(U) All civilian personnel dollars were incorporaind in the Personnel EC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U)CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and badgeted within the CIAP.

156 ~TOP-SECRETISYTIINOPORIIZEXT-


—FOR-GEGRETIGHFCINEFORNHES—_$—

~ (U) Acquisition Summary (U) Major Contractors

(U) Independent Cost Estimate


|
|


THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


{U) Ail personnel dollars are incorporated in the Personne] EC in FY 2007 and FY 2008 and in the Enterprise Management BC in FY 2009.

(U) MilPees funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.



THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


Homan Resources (continued)

Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account

FY 2007 — FY 2009

‘This Display is SECRET/NOFORN:

FY 07 FY 08 FY 09

(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
{U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.



FY 2008 Appropriation to FY 2009 Request by Project
‘This Exhibit is

GEOINT Stations Expenditare Center [
SECRETHITALENT EETHOLE/NOFORN—

‘VO4P_EC_GS_TBL_JFYO7AppmpYOERoquenPrej.fm

146 TOP SECRETHSYTRINOPORNTZSXT—








“TOP 'SECRETIISVTRINOFORNIZSXT

(U) ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT
(U) SYSTEM ENGINEERING: COMMUNICATIONS

‘This Exhibit is SECRET/PADENT-KEYHOREHNOPORN-

(U) Description

(U/AFOVUO) This project funds systems engineering and architecture
studies, technology assessment, modeling and analysis, risk
Management, systems integration, and customer requirements and
engineering controls processes necessary to plan for and manage the
NRO communications enterprise within a service management-driven
infrastructure to ensure end-to-end service delivery and customer
satisfaction. Specifically this project will:

* (U) Monitor enterprise IT systems and space communications

activities for efficient compliance with the allocated COMM

architectural requirements.

* (U) Integrate current and future NRO communications architecture

initiatives into the broader Integrated NRO Architecture and the

overarching National Intelligence Collection Architecture.

* (U) Support a customer needs assessment program to collect our

customer's strategic mission and mission support needs to effectively

align COMM IT services to meet customer’s future mission
technology needs.

* (UNFOBE) Support studies to identify/integrate investments
necessary for NRO communications COOP and survivability.

Totals may not add due to rounding

© (U/POUOy Interact with other NRO activities and IC partners to
ensure end-to-end continuity and security of essential functions in
primary and reconstituted modes in order to ensure access to critical
communications capabilities across IC agencies and customers.

* (U/FOBO} Architect, plan, sustain, and improve information
assurance capabilities needed to enable information and operational
network security while protecting against denial of service attacks
and the compromise of sensitive and compartmented information.

* (U) Coordinate and integrate schedules with other NRO
directorates and offices and IC partners to support service delivery.

* (U) Collect and evaluate performance metrics to enable COMM to
rapidly identify corrective actions for potential NRO network
problems and to improve process performance.

* (U) Perform pre-deployment modeling and simulation of network
changes by collecting and analyze live network data at the services

* (U/FOUC) Utilize Independent Test and Evaluation Center to
perform pre-deployment independent verification/validation testing
and perform test anomaly resolution to support operational networks.
* (U) Employ Service Management framework and best practices to
develop, manage, and deliver IT services in an efficient and effective
manner.


(U) Finding 8: At the time of the PART evaluation, not all acquisition
baselines were clearly documented in BAARs.

=
a
el

ee

(U) Follow-Up Actions (Improvement Plan)

(U) Follow-Up Action 7: With ODNI, developing outcome-based
performance measures that assess IMINT contributions to achieving
goals petle eneoclated with the National Intelligence Strategy.

Pd


~FOP-BECRETHSIHNOFORNIESIA—
(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 ~ FY 2009

Security

Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account
FY 2007 - FY 2009

‘This Display is SECRETANOFORN———

(U) All civilian persorme! dollars were incorporated in the Personnel EC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.



(Dollars in Thousands)
Ee came rma

‘2008 Appropriation to FY 2009 Request by Project
This Babin is SECRETTALENT METHOLE/NOPORN-



Resource Exhibit No. 13 P|
National Reconnaissance Program

Authorized & Filled Military Positions by Service/Agency & Position Type

‘This Exhibit is SEEREF—





Expenditure Center Performance Summary: SIGINT Low



Human Resources (continued)

Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account

FY 2007 - FY 2009

‘This Display ts SECRET/NOFORN

FY 07 FY 68 FY 09

bud

mc ‘AP positions fare detailed ‘othe ’ authorized | sd budgeted ‘0 within the CIAP.


TOP-SECRETISITIC/NOFORNIESXt ——§

(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009
SIGINT Station Integration & Support
‘by Appropriation Account
FY 2007 - FY 2009
‘This Display is SREREP/PALENT-KEVHOLEHNOFORN:
FY 07 CI FY 09

{(U) All persotnel dollars are incorporated in the Personne! EC in FY 2007 and FY 2008 and in the Enterprise Management BC in FY
{U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and badgeted within the CLAP.

74 “FOP-BERETISHFINOFORNIES—




(U) SPACE COMMUNICATIONS EXPENDITURE CENTER

(U) The table below displays selected IC-wide measures developed to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of NIP activities for this expenditure
center (EC) in relation to funding and alignment to performance areas. Targets for some measures are under development. The succeeding table
summarizes project-specific past performance information.

102 FOP-REGRETISHACINOFGRNAEEK4t—




—FOP-GEGRETHEIFRNOFORNH2EX4+—§$

(U) GEOINT EO
(U) ENHANCED IMAGERY SYSTEM



“FOP SECRETHSHTIINOFORNT 2ST —————

(U) ENTERPRISE IT SYSTEMS
(U) INFORMATION ASSURANCE

(U) Description

(U) The Information Assurance (IA) project funds operational and
programmatic activities designed to secure the NRO information
enterprise. This includes oversight and support for Certification &
Accreditations, IA vulnerability alert monitoring, enterprise perimeter
security, information systems security engineering, red teaming for
network vulnerability discovery, and enterprise auditing.




Expenditure Center Performance Summary: GEOINT EO



106 —FOP-SECRETIOIFACINGFORNHESt—


Figure 17.


44
FOP-SECRETH/SUTUINOPORIGIZXT


431 “FOP BEORETHOIIGINOFORNIESK A —


—FOP-SECRETISICINOFORNHES—

(U) SIGINT STATIONS EXPENDITURE CENTER

(U) The table below displays selected 1C-wide measures developed to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of NIP activities for this expenditure
center (EC) in relation to funding and alignment to performance areas. Targets for some measures are under development. The succeeding table
summarizes project-specific past performance information

163 “FOP SECRETHSHTHINOFORNHZOX T———


FOP SEGRETHEKHNOFORNHEEKA—

(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009
Facilities
Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account
FY 2007- FY 2009
This Display is SRERET/TALENP- RE YHOLE/NOFORN ———
FY 07 FY 0 FY09

U) All person ‘are incorporated in the F
(U) MilPers fanding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.

310 TOP-SRCRETHSUTININOFORNTZENT—


FOP SECRETISHTICINOFORNTZINT—

(U//FOUS) Finding 6: Program partners commit to the goals of the
AS&T Program. The Program collaborates and coordinates well with
related Programs, and conducts intensive coordination efforts with other
federal space and science and technology agencies. For example,
AS&T’s practice of assigning personnel to customer organizations to
a Ee TT would’ beneht fom amore, stuctaed

success. AS&T would benefit from a more structured
ochanism that documents feedback from customers.

(U/MFOUE) Finding 7: Timely, quality independent reviews of the

bulk of the AS&T ins a

(U/FOUO) Finding 8: The AS&T Program evaluates the benefits of
alternative investments, uses a prioritization process to guide budget
requests, and uses management processes to maintain Program quality.

376

_

(U) Follow-Up Actions (Improvement Plan)

(U) As a result of the PART evaluation, the NRO and the AS&T
Program are initiating the following actions to improve the performance
of the Program.

(U/FOUG)- Follow-Up Action 1: Fan

(UW/FORE) Follow-Up Action 2: Clearly documenting Strategy,
Technology, and Engineering Panel findings.

(U/FOO) Follow-up Action 3: Establishing a more structured
mechanism that documents feedback from customers.

(U/FOVE) Follow-Up Action 4: Reviewing measures that have
moving averages to determine if there is a time period that is more
meaningful.

Follow-Up Action 5:


—FOP-BEORETIOIICINOFORNIESHt—
166


FOR GEGRETIGHACINOFORNHESK+—

* (U) Mission critical information services including collected data
management, computer user hardware and software support, and
database management.

© (U) Real-time and offline mission assessment services,

» (U) Infrastructure support such as networks, facilities,
configuration management, asset recapitalization, and so forth.

* (U) SIGINT quick-reaction collection, processing, and analytical
capability. (U) Real Estate Sales Reinvestment

* (U) Spacecraft anomaly resolution.

© (U) SIGINT mission planning and execution for the overhead
SIGINT constellation.

© (U) Signal distribution within the MGSs and signal recording.







FOP-SECRETISIFHCINGFORNHZSNt——

GEOINTSIGINT Integrated Ground Development Engineering & Management Expenditure Center (continued) ml
Resource by Project & Appropriation

176 FOR SECRETHSITKINOFORNGEXI—


FY 67 FY 08 FY 09

‘(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.



981 ——FOP-BEGRETIGIFRCINOFORNHEEKA—


*FOP-SECRETISHTIINOPORNAZSXT—

(U) CONGRESSIONAL REPROGRAMMING ACTIONS

371 —FOR-BEGRETIGIFFKINOFORNHEE4+—


THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

116 —FOP-SECRETHSYTICNOPORNIZSXt —


FOP SECRETISHFIGINGFORNHEENt —
(U) Program/Activity Evaluated in 2007 (U) Activity Funding Level ($M)

(U) Program: National Reconnaissance Program and NRO
Military Intelligence Program

(U) Imagery Intelligence (IMINT) Program

(U) Activity Summary/Description

(U) Rating: Adequate
a

Pe



TOP SEO RETHSITIONOFORNE Zt

(U) MCS—mission control system.
(U/fFOUO) MDDS—M-22 Data Dissemination System

(U) MGS—amission ground station.

(U) MHz—megahertz (10° Hertz or cycles per second).
(U) MIGS—Multi-INT Ground Service.

(U) MilPers—military personnel.

(U) MIND—Mission Integration and Development. The FIA ground
segment that performs the architecture's mission management,
communication relay management and data routing functions.

(U) MIPS—amillion instructions per second.

(U) MLE—mean life estimate. Estimate of remaining lifetime of a space
asset taking into account current state and system reliability.

(U) MMD—1inean mission duration.

<) -coreer>

()

(U) MPLS—Multiprotocol Label Switching. Data carrying mechanism
that belongs to the family of packet-switching networks.

(U) NAB—NRO Acquisition Board.

(U) NCG—NRO Cost Group.

(U) NGEL—Next Generation Edge LAN. Program that efficiently
merges long-haul data with the desktop user through means of new,
high-speed switching equipment serving as the interface between the
campus LAN and long-haul communication.

(U) NGEO—Next Generation Electro-optic system.

(U) NGOS—Next Generation Overhead SIGINT. The IOSA follow-on
architecture.

(U) NHIRS—National Imagery Interpretability Rating Scale. Standardize
system for describing the intelligence tasks that can be performed using
an image.

(U) NIS—National Intelligence Strategy.

(U) NMIS—NRO management information system.

(U) NMS—NRO Mission Support.

(U) NOPS—NRO Operations Squadron.

(U) NRP—National Reconnaissance Program.

(U) NTM—National Technical Means.

(U) OCMC—Overhead 9 Collection Ma Center. Joint,
fully-integrated organization which brokers all SIGINT overhead
requirements.

(U) OD&E—CIA Office of Development and Engineering.

(U) OEF—Operation ENDURING FREEDOM.

(U) OF—operations facility.

(U) OIR—Operation IRAQI FREEDOM.

(U) ONIR—overhead non-imaging infrared. A subset of MASINT
focused on infrared signatures.

443 TOP-SECRET SUTRANOPORNUZSK 1 —


(U) All civilian persoanel dollars were incorporated in the Personnel EC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.
(U) MilPers fnding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP potitions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.



(U) All civilian personnel dollars were ‘wee incorporate in the Perioane] EC'in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management BC in FY 2008 and FY 2002.

(U) MilPers fanding is within the applicable military
ee ane ante ee NO tad catborted wad bape within the CLAP.



(U) Acquisition Summary

(U) Major Contractors

(U) Independent Cost Estimate contractor
no) 5 El Segundo, California: Prime

341
— FOR CEGRETIEIFNOFORNHREXT—


~FOR-BEGRETISIFHCINOFORNHESN—§$—

(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009
Al
Highlights by Appropriation Account
FY 2007 - FY 2009
This Display is SECRET/TALENT KEYHOLE/SNOFORN
FY 07 FY

(U) All civilian personnel dollars were incorporsted in the Personnel EC in FY 2007 and the Enterprive Management BC in FY 2008 and FY 2009,
(U) MilPera funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U)CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.



Enterprise Management Expenditure Center
FY 2008 Appropriation to FY 2009 Request by Project
‘This Exhibit is



(U) All civilian personnel dollars were incorporated in the Personnel BC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.

(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable departipent budget.
(U) CLAP poritions are detziled to the NRO but uthorized and budgeted within the CLAP.



— FOR SECRETHSUTKINOFORNHZEXt——

(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 — FY 2009

Enterprise Architecture & Planning
Budget Highlights by Appropriation Acconnt

Ths Display e SECRETINOFORN—
Fy 07 FY G8 FY

(Mien is within the applicable department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.


—~TOP'SECRETISYTRINOFORNN 29K 1 —————

(U) LAUNCH
(U) LAUNCH OPS AND ENGINEERING

(U) Description

(U) The Launch Operations and Engineering project provides launch
related support for all NRO satellite programs. Specifically, this project
supports:

* (U) The NRO Payload Transportation System which provides

secure transportation from factory to launch base and throughout

launch base processing for all NRO satellites using NRO launch base
faciliti

« (U) Use of forklifts, tractors, trailers, and other mechanical
hardware for satellite vehicle (SV) electrical aerospace ground
equipment and SV mechanical aerospace ground equipment.

¢ (U) SV and mission documentation requirements, including those
required by the National Environmental Policy Act, and Occupational
Safety and Health regulations.

* (U) Eastern and Western Range instrumentation support.

¢(U)NRO Operations Squadron (NOPS) launch support,
downrange/ascent telemetry capture, and processing operations for
NRO launches.

* (U) Contracted Advisory and Assistance Services, Systems
Engineering and Technical Analysis, and System Integration support.
© (U) Independent validation and verification (IV&V) of launch
contractor mission design parameters.

* (U) NRO launch base administrative facility O&M.

» (U) NRO mission unique (secure) communication at the launch
sites (e.g., secure launch pad communications for NRO payloads).

137 TOR SECRETISIIUORORMI26X4


GEOINTISIGINT Integrated Ground Expenditure Center mim

FY 2008 Appropriation to FY 2009 Request by Project
This Exhibit is:



THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


(U) Totals may not add duc to rounding.


FOP. SECRETHSUINOFORNI2EXt ——
(U) COMMUNICATIONS FUNCTIONAL AVAILABILITY

(U) Communications FA Mission Statement: Mma

(U) Vehicle Highlights

FOP-SEGRETHEIARGINGFORNHEEKt——

361


FY 2007 - FY 2009
‘This Display is SEEREP/TALENT-EEYHOLE/NOFORN—

‘(U) All personne! dollars are incorporated in the Personnel BC in FY 2007 and FY 2008 and in the Enterprise Management.
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.



113 —TOP-SECRET/SIAIGINOFORNHESN + ————


Resource Exhibit No. 9A. zs

National Reconnaissance Program .
Funds by Expenditure Center, Program Element, & Appropriation Title
This Exhibit is SECRET/TALENT KE YHOLE(NGFORN———





—FOP-AESRETHOHTNEFORNIESKt-———
(U) Budget Changes FY 2009 - FY 2011

Logistics
Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account

FY 2007- FY 2009

This Display is SECRETHTALENT- RE YHOLEANOPORN—

FY 67 FY 68 FY 09

(U) MilPers funding in within applicable department budget.
(U) CLAP positions are detxiled to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.

314 -FOP-GEGRETIGIFIGANGFORNH2S—


‘(U) All civilian personnel dollars were incorporated in the Personact EC in FY 2007 aad the Enterprise Management BC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP,



'*(U) Specified as two separate acquisitions in the FY 2008 CBIB.
(U) Totals may not add due to rounding.


FOP -GECRETIGIFACINOFORNHESNt——

(U) SIGINT HIGH
(U) HIGH-ALTITUDE INTEGRATION & SUPPORT

(U) Description



—FOP-SECRETISIIGINGFORNHZSX tT ———

(U) MISSION SERVICES AND MISSION MANAGEMENT 1.0

(U) Acquisition Summary

(U) Independent Cost Estimate

(U/PORE) Since Mission Services and Mission Management 1.0
reflects a series of projects presently on-contract, the NCG conducted a
BSR in September 2007. The NCG conducted ICE for every SIGINT
acquisition from FY 2002 to 2007, which included incremental Ground
of their estimates.

element_costs_ as

(U) Major Contractors
» (U) BIT Systems, Herndon, VA: Collection management, mission
assessment and performance assessment development.
© (U) Lockheed Martin, Chantilly, VA: Ground systems integrator.
© (U)Northrop Grumman/TASC, Chantilly, VA: Systems
engineering and technical assistance.
+ (U) Impact Science, Nashua, NH: Collection storage development.

* (U) Lockheed Martin, San Jose, CA: Mission Management
developer.

* (U) Lockheed Martin, San Jose, CA and Hanover, MD: Mission
Management developer and maintenance.

* (U) Raytheon, Garland, TX: Real-time control development.

* (U) Raytheon, State College, PA: Messaging development and site
deployment support. .

351 —TOP-SECRETISUTIONOPORNZSXT——$


FOP SECRETISHITIOINOFORNTZINT—

which will create and sustain taining programs focused on clear
corporate objectives. This integrated, career-based approach to training
and education will ensure employees are grounded in a shared
understanding of the NRO mission and principles.

(U) Staffing and Demographic Trends:

(U) NRO fill rates have remained stable over the period FY 2004 —
2007. Given the transient nature of the workforce and the realities of
filling classified positions, on the surface this trend appears positive.
However, the NRO’s average fill rate is 85 percent, meaning that
15 percent of NRO positions are vacant. Fill rates vary by partner
agency and occupation and are due to partner agency workforce policies.

(U) In order to meet Congressionally-directed manning levels, the
Department of the Air Force reevaluated their process for filling Special
Program Assignments for military personnel. Additionally, the
Docwunent offthe Air Force utilized the following force shaping
measures to reduce end strength during this time period, which has had
some affect on the NRO.

* (U) Force Shaping Boards targeting company grade officers for
early separation.

* (U) Encouraging early separations through Voluntary Separation
Pay for captains and majors.

* (U) Selective Early Retirement Boards for senior officers.

© (U) Reenlistments for personnel in or willing to cross-train into
occupations requiring critical skills.

(U) Currently, the Air Force attempts to maintain a consistent fill of
their NRO positions. In the past, these assignments were 4-year tours
exempt from deployment. As a result of the Air Force’s contributions to
the Global War on Terrorism, recent policy changes have evolved thus
affecting Air Force personnel assigned to the NRO in two ways: Air
Force military tours for contracting officers and contracting enlisted
members are no longer exempt from deployments and the current fill
policy for all specialties is at a rate less than 100 percent, but based upon
rates higher than worldwide entitlement (or fill) rates. However,
tanning levels at NRO operational sites remain staffed at 100 percent.
Given that the Air Force military personnel account for significant
portions of NRO mission critical occupations (i.e. 34 percent of
acquisitions and engineers, 55 percent of operations, and 78 percent of
information technology), any decrease in manning rates will strike at the
heart of NRO’s mission capabilities.

(U) Similar to the Air Force military personnel, the Navy military
personnel are subject to deployments. While Navy military fill rates
have remained steady, averaging above 80 percent, the personnel
assigned to the NRO must still respond to mid-tour deployment needs,
thus reducing the number of personnel actually working at the NRO.

(U) An additional area of concem associated with growth is
it personnel. For example, new arrivals (between FY 2003 -
2006) from the CIA have significantly less CLA experience upon arrival
than those arriving between FY 1997 - 2002, As a result, the NRO must
now be prepared to train and develop these less experienced employees.

(U) The NRO has a growing number of new employees, including a
significant number of former military and government civilians, who
have limited experience within their new parent organization. Of the
NRO current workforce, 60 percent of GS-12’s and below have five
years or less experience with their parent agency. Included in the
60 percent of the workforce with five years or less of service with their
parent agency, approximately 65 percent were hired by the CIA with
fess than full performance level experience (based on grade/rank at the
time of hire) in their occupation.

10 —FOP-SECRETISUTICNOPORNIZIXt —




(U) This project also includes resources for studies, enhancements,
and other design changes.


THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


~FOP-SECRETHISIFTIOINOFORNH2SNT ——————

(U) PACIFIC COMMUNICATIONS TERMINAL

(U) Acquisition Summary (U) Independent Cost Estimate

(U) Major Contractors
* (U) Raytheon Corporation; Reston, VA: Mission Integration and
Development (MIND) prime contractor.

* (U) Lockheed-Martin; San Jose, CA and Valley Forge, PA: MIND
major subcontractor.


ee

(U) Acquisition Summary (U) Major Contractors

* (U) Lockheed Martin, Sunnyvale, CA: Prime contractor.

* (U) Northrop Grumman Linthicum, MD: Transducer and data
processor subsystem.

* (U) ITT Rochester, NY: Optical subsystem.

© (U) Northrop Grumman Redondo Beach, CA: Wideband

(U) Independent Cost Estimate

AC oe 28 0 3

dasistent withthe scope of the DN it

ly includes space acquisition, ground command and
launch costs.

319 TOP-SECRET ISU TIIINOPORM 2541


“FOP-BEORETISHHCINOFORNHZSt—

(U) Management Oversight

(U) Management oversight for the NRP is provided by:
* (U) Director of National Intelligence.

* (U) Secretary of Defense.

* (U) Office of Management and Budget.

(U) Appropriations Use

(U) Funding for National Intelligence Strategy Mission
Objectives

(U) The NRO’s purpose is summarized in 50 USC 403-5 as follows:
“the research and development, acquisition, and operation of overhead
reconnaissance systems necessary to satisfy the requirements of all
elements of the intelligence community.” Under this purpose, the NRO
provides and/or operates as a continuing service, suitable overhead
reconnaissance systems that enable NRO and its partners to plan, direct,
and perform overhead collection; to process and exploit overhead and

associated non-overhead data; and to distribute, disseminate, share, and
communicate intelligence as necessary to satisfy the requirements of all
elements of the IC.

(U) The NRO’s key role in the partnership.is to keep its systems
available and capable on a continual basis to satisfy mission partner
established requirements. This includes regularly replenishing the
capabilities and modernizing current capabilities in response to its
partners’ approved requirements. As a result, NRO systems support all
of the NIS Mission Objectives, primarily through the operational
availability of its satellites and ground stations. Specifically, satellite
normalized operational availability measures the percentage of time
each on-orbit system (including command and control and any relay)
was available for operations during a fiscal year, normalized to
beginning of life.

(©) The operations of SIGINT and GEOINT Stations, and
GEOINT/SIGINT Integrated Ground Development activities support
the NIS Mission Objectives and are reflected in Figure 1 that follows.
These ECs are included in the Processing and Exploitation functional
category. The Collection and Operations funding reflects NRO
compartmented programs funding included in the Sensitive Technical
Collection EC. Finally, Research and Technology funding reflects
Advanced Technology Demonstrations as well as Basic and Applied
Research projects.

(U) Figure 1 depicts NRP funding associated with each mission
objective. Mission Objectives 1, 2 and 4 are slightly higher due to the
inclusion of Compartmented Programs, Advanced Technology, and
Ground Segment Development projects. Since projects support more
than one mission objective, the total funding shown exceeds the NRP
budget request. Note: Funding for acquisition projects that have not
achieved an initial operating capability, and projects that provide (or will
provide) general support for intelligence activities (c.g. logistics,
infrastructure, corporate management), are not included.




THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

112 —FOP-GEGRETISHICINOFORNHOE4+——




TOP SECRETHSHTRINOPORNGZ5X

* (U) Annual acquisition goals:

+ (U) Long-term and annual operational goals:

(U) Follow-Up Actions (Improvement Plan)
(U) The SIGINT Program has made significant changes. The SIGINT

Program continues to implement the following actions to improve the
performance of the Program.

* (U) Long-term acquisition goals:

— (U/fFOUO) The Program expects to mect its long-term
technical performance goals.



THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


UGA Ground Development (continued)

(U) All civilian personne! dollars were incorporated in the Personnel BC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.

(U) MilPers fonding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.

189





108

—FOP-SECRETHSHTIGINOFORN/ESX4—

Communications Space Schedule

‘This Figure le SEORIFAAENT-KENHOLEINOFORN—

Figure 10.


FOP-GECRETISIFICINOFORNHESIA—

m eee HIGH

“Totals may not add due to rounding

(U) Description

© (U) Commercial COMSAT-based solution.
(U) Ten-year design life.

© (U) Firm fixed price contract with performance-based provisions.

© (U) Commercial space product assurance practices.
¢ (U) US commercial launch vehicle and launch services.


—TFOP-BECRETIOFACINOFORNHESI-

(U) GEOINT/SIGINT INTEGRATED GROUND DEVELOPMENT,
ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURE CENTER

(U) The table below displays selected IC-wide measures developed to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of NIP activities for this expenditure
center (EC) in relation to funding and alignment to performance areas. Targets for these measures are under development. The succeeding table
summarizes project-specific past performance information.

‘This Table is

181 —FOP-GECREFISIFCHNOFGRNH2EKt—————


184

GEOINT/SIGINT Integrated Ground Develo;

Figure 15.

0813 tt 8.21


—FOP- SECRETS OMNOFORNIES AT ——

(U) SIGINT LOW
(U) LOW ALTITUDE INTEGRATION & SUPPORT

(U) Description

(U) The Low Altitude Integration and Support project provides
resources for engineering and technical assistance SIGINT LEO, E2
maintenance, travel, awards, and training.

(U) This project provides the Contracted Advisory and Assistance
Services (CAAS), non-CAAS, and Federally Funded Research and
Development Center (FFRDC) engineering and technical assistance
resources to support the Low Altitude Integration and Support efforts
which include:

* (U) Conducting independent reviews

ion performance.

* (U) Evaluating the C&C segment development and special studies
and analyses of system upgrades.

* (U) Conducting acquisition planning.
© (U) Adaptive and corrective E2 maintenance and anomaly support.
«(Si

i

* (U) Maintaining key program documentation, including the
ions, interface control documents, CONOPS, risk
management plans, verification plans, and readiness plans.

(U) The project provides resources for personne! assigned within the
SIGINT Low Expenditure Center to travel and receive training in
Support of the mission. Awards are given in recognition of outstanding
performance on a ycarly basis to deserving personnel.

61 ——FOR-GECRETISIFIGNOFORNHGEKS


H
i
E
z
:



—TOP'SECHETISITRIINOFORINTZSXT—

(U) GEOINT EO EXPENDITURE CENTER

19 FOP-SECRETHSITICINOFORNAEENt ———_——




TOR BEGRETHISIIINGFORNZEX+——

(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 — FY 2009

(G) All vin personel dallas wer carport inthe Perot ECin FY 2007 ed the Ecepsse Managemen BC FY 2008 snd FY 208,

(VU) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP,



FOP BEORETHOFIGINOFORNIESXt—
(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

Finance

Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account
FY 2007 - FY 2009

This Display is SECREFHNOFORN——

FY FY 08

(Q) Al cin pert dala were incorporated in he Penonnol BC ia FY 2007s the Enerpae Managemest EC in FY 2008 aed FY 2009.
{U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.



‘(U) Totals may not add due to rounding,

318
—FOP-SEGRETISIFHEINOFORNHEEKt——








incorporated in the Personne! BC in FY 2007 and FY 2008 and in the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2009.
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military depertunent budget.
(U) CLAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.

Bt ~FOP-GEGRETIIFAGINOFORNHEENT-


THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


—FOR-SECRETHEIF-KINOFORNHREXt——

(U) Acquisition Summary (U) Major Contractors

* (U) Lockheed Martin, Sunnyvale, CA: Prime contractor.

* (U) Northrop Grumman Linthicum, MD: Transducer and data
processor subsystem.

* (U) ITT Rochester, NY: Optical subsystem.

*()Northrop Grumman Redondo Beach, CA: Wideband
communications subsystem.

PS

(U) Independent Cost Estimate

317 “TOP-SECRETISITIOINOFORNTZ5X 1 —


FOP SECRETHSHTICINOFORNHZSNT —

(U) PROCESSING AND EXPLOITATION

(U) The Processing and Exploitation Budget Category includes funding to provide, operate, sustain, and enhance suitable systems enabling the NRO
and its partners to process and exploit overhead and other data necessary to satisfy the requirements of all IC elements for use in the production of
intelligence or in execution of a national security mission. The table below displays the funding and contribution of this Budget Category 's Expenditure
Centers to performance areas, including the National Intelligence Strategy mission objectives.

143 ~FOP-GEGRETHGIFAGNOFORNSK——


——FOP-SEOCRETISIHFCINOFORNHES—
(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

This Display is SRERET/NOPORN-

136


14

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


—TOP-SECRET/SIFRCANOFORNH25%4+—@£§+

(U) ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT
(U) NRO MISSION SUPPORT

(U) Description

(U//PEUE) The NRO Mission Support (NMS) project supports the
Director, NRO’s Strategic Framework, published in April 2006, on
building an integrated overhead architecture responsive to current and
future needs of the IC and DoD. The NMS project is charged with
ensuring effective NRO support to external users that includes
understanding their information needs, educating them on current
collection capabilities, and developing new capabilities to solve their
operational and intelligence problems. More specifically, the NMS
Project:

* (U/PEUC) Provides special technical operations support to the
Joint Function Component Command for Space (JCC-SPACE) and
COCOMs with integrated planning for operational and
compartmented activities.

‘Tonals may not add due to rounding

leadership during contingency operations and exercises.

» (U/FOUOY Develops new user applications that maximize the
utility of national system capabilities and data through collaboration
across the NRO, government, industry, and academic communities.
* (U/POE) Enhances engagement with tactical users to fully
understand their real-time information needs. Provide users access to
real-time national systems data derived from overhead systems,
thereby facilitating mission success and averting casualties.


(U) Performance Measures !

‘This Exhibit is SHCRETYTALENT KEY HOBRINOPORN

2 (U/MPQUE) Exror in the 2006 NRO PART Summary ~ correct value now shown.



—TOP-SECRETHSIFTOINOFORNHZS Nt —
(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

Launch Operations and Engineering

‘Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account

FY 2007- Fy 2009

‘This Display is SECRET/TALENT- KE YROLEHNOFORN

‘U) All personnel dollars are incorporated in the Personnel BC in FY 2007 and FY 2008 and in the aterprise Management BC in FY 2009.
(U) MilPers fanding is within the applicable military department budget.



THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


(U) The FY 2009 Budget Request
(U) The NRO FY 2009 request supports the NIS, the IC’s 500 Day

Plan, and documented user requirements. It also supports the NRO’s
long term efforts to implement the NRO Strategic Framework. At the
summary level, our FY 2009 request:

* (U) Funds studies and analysis, requirements development, and
initial development/deployment of new collaborative data sharing
tools to include tools to support sharing with tactical environments.

* (U) Continues the transition of current diversified ground
capabilities toward a single, unified ground architecture.

(U) Conclusion

(U) This request represents a balance between responsiveness to
immediate and near-term user needs and the imperative to maintain the
longer-term investment levels necessary to sustain collection throughout
the FYDP. This request also is responsive to IC priorities and supports
the technical, organizational, and managerial initiatives necessary to
realize the vision outlined in the NRO Strategic Framework.

‘|

Scott F. Large
National Reconnaissance Office


oT STN

© (U/FOUGy (Year Began: 2005. Action taken, but not completed).
NRO developed a remediation plan with milestones and is now
working to achieve an unqualified opinion in the FY 2009 audit.



—TOP-GECRETHISIFTIOMNOFORNTZSX Tt —

(U) GEOINT/SIGINT INTEGRATED GROUND DEVELOPMENT,
ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURE CENTER

GEOINTSIGINT Integrated Ground Development Engineering & Management Expenditure Center
FY 207 SFY oe APerowrinie

‘This Exhibit is SECRET/PALENT EE YHOLE/NOFORN



—TOR-SECRETHSLTIGNORORN2E

(U) GEOINT/SIGINT INTEGRATED GROUND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT
(U) UGA ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT

U) Description



TOP SECRETI/SVTK/INOFORN//25X1

FY 07 FY 08

(U) All civilian personne! dollars were incorporated in the Personnel EC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget, ;
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.

FY 09



164 “TOP SECRETHISUTINOPORNG ZX T—


Expenditure Center Performance Summary: SIGINT High



TOP SECRETHISHTIANOFORN2941—

(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 ~ FY 2009

Enhanced

‘(U) All civitian personnel dollars were incorporated in the Personne] EC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.

(U) MalPers funding is within the applicable military department budget,
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO bot authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.





— TOR SECRETISITKNOFORNIREX-

(U) GEOINT STATIONS EXPENDITURE CENTER

(U) The table below displays selected IC-wide measures developed to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of NIP activities for this expenditure
center (EC) in relation to funding and alignment to performance areas. The succeeding table summarizes project-specific past performance information

“7 FOP CEGRETISIFANGFORNHBEX!


THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


(U) Major Contractors


“TOP-SEERETISITIOINOFORN2SXt —

(U) GEOINT EO EXPENDITURE CENTER

(U) The table below displays selected IC-wide measures developed to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of NIP activities for this expenditure
center (EC) in relation to funding and alignment to performance areas. Targets for some measures are under development. The succeeding table
summarizes project-specific past performance information.

a FOP-BEGRETHSIFIINOFORNHREM—


301




—TFOP-SEGRETHIOIFCINGFORNHES 4 ——

(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

188 ~FOP-SECRETIOFTICINOFORNHESI—

FY08



Applied Research (continued)

Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account

FY 2007 - FY 2009

‘This Display is SRCREF/PALENT KEYHOLEHNOFORN

CU) All penonse ola ate iowporsedis ie Fesoanel EC in FY 2007 and FY 2008 end in the Enierpriae Management BC FY 2008

(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.



TOP SECRETISUTRINOFORN/Z5XT—
(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 — FY 2009

(U) MilPers funding in within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detaifed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.



Applied Research (continued)

Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account.

FY 2007 - FY 2009

‘This Display is SECRET/TALENT- KEYHOLE/INOFORN—

‘(U) All personnel dollars sre ar lncorporated in tbe Ferganel Cin FY 207 and FY 2008 an in the Exepise Mangement HC in FY 2007

(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military

department budget.
(U) CLAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.

244

TOP-SRORETISYTIOINOFORNNZIKT



Expenditure Center Performance Summary: GEOINT EO



—“FOP-SECRETHSITIOINOFORNIZSNT —

(U) GEOINT STATIONS EXPENDITURE CENTER

145 —FOP-SECRETISHTICINOFORNHES A —


-FOP-SECRETISITHONOFORNIEENT———

- SIGINT HIGH



(U) Major Contractors

(U) Independent Cost Estimate

321
—TOP-SECRETISHTIINOPORNTESKT —


(U) All personnel incorporated in the Personnel EC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management EC in FY
(WU) MilPers fanding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.



SEMEN Te
National Reconnaissance Program

FY 2008 Appropriation to FY 2005 Request by Expenditure Center

‘This Exhibit is SHOREE/PALENT KEYHOERINOFORN





THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


TOP SECRETHSITOINOP ORIN ZIRT

(U) SIGINT STATIONS
(U) SIGINT STATION INTEGRATION & SUPPORT

(U) Description

(U) The SIGINT Station Integration & Support project includes
funding for systems engineering efforts addressing O&M enginecring
challenges affecting every aspect of SIGINT collection and production.
The types of engineering support performed include:

* (U) Integration of space C&C systems, ground processing, and

other infrastructure systems.

* (U) Validation and verification of the technical performance

baseline.

* (U) Engineering readiness assessments of capabilities prior to

insertion into the operational baseline.

* (U) On-orbit testing of new spacecraft functionality and

* (U) Spacecraft anomaly resolution.

‘may not add due to rounding

* (U) Evaluation of IOSA constellation strategy options.

© (U) Operational evaluations.

© (U) Operational need statement evaluations.

* (U) Operational testing and checkout support for legacy and IOSA
spacecraft.

© (U) Engineering assessments of new operational capabilities.

© (U) Spacecraft decommissioning efforts.

(U) This project also provides funding for Contracted Advisory and
Assistance Services and Federally Funded Research and Development
Center support.

(VU) This project further provides funding to support System
Directorate personnel travel, PCS moves to and from the

Operations
NRO MGSs, mission training, and awards recognition.

173 —TFOP-SEORETIOITICINOFORNIESHt—


{U) All civilian personnel

(U) MilPers funding is

«U) CLAP positions are

dollars
within the

applicable mili
"Jetailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.

‘Personnel EC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management BC in PY 2008 and FY 2009.

budget.

TOR BEGRETISIANORORNREXS——



THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


FOR. GEGREHISHCHNOFORNIREKt ———
ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURE CENTER





(U) All civilian personnel dollars were incorporated in the Personnel BC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.



er) (4 SET—Small

“TOP SECRETHSUTHIINOPORNZSKT —

(U) SAR—synthetic aperture radar. A collection capability that uses
returns from actively transmitted radar signals to produce
high-resolution images regardless of weather or darkness.

(U) SCMIS—Secret collateral management information system.
(U) SCT V—spacecraft thermal vacuum test.
(U) SDR—system design review.

inal. Antenna used for S-band
communications to}

(U) SETA—system engineering and technical analysis.
(U) SI&E—system integration and engineering.
(U) SIGINT—Signals Intelligence.

(U) SOMMS—SIGINT Overhead Mission Management System. A
Tedwate and software tool that provides OCMC’ the capability to
allocate SIGINT satellites against intelligence targets in accordance with
priorities and guidance established by the SIGINT Overhead
Reconnaissance Subcommittee.

(U) SP—SIGINT production. A processor for SIGINT Low.
(U) SPIF—Spacecraft Processing and Integration Facility.

(U) SRR—system requirements review.
(U) STO—special technical operations.
(U) STR—SIGINT Test Range.

(U) SURREY—NSA's source of SIGINT requirements under the
Unified Cryptologic Architecture.

(U) SV—space vehicle,

(U) TECHELINT—Technical Electronic Intelligence.

(U) TTP—tactics, techniques, and procedures.
(U) UGA—anified ground architecture.

(U) ULA—United Launch Alliance. The Lockheed-Martin/Boeing joint
venture for manufacturing and supporting the Atlas and Delta EELV
booster systems.

(U) USAT—ultra small aperture terminal.

(U) UWAN—unclassified wide-area network. NRO’s unclassified
network, a

(U) VAFB—Vandenberg Air Force Base.

(U) WAN—wide area network.


—FOP-GEORETIBIFAGINGFORNHES—



—FOP-BECRETIOIFCINGFORNAESt—
213


TOP-SEERETISITIINOPORNTZSNT—
(U) SIGINT HIGH FUNCTIONAL AVAILABILITY (COMEX)

(U) SIGINT COMEX Functional Availability Mission Statement

(U) IOSA COMEX Success Criteria

* (U) Spacecraft models were updated for on-orbit status changes and
revised end-of-life predictions.

© (U) Slight changes in the FA curve beyond FY 2008 are caused by:

iii
a

(U) COMEX Vehicle Highlights
(U) There have been no significant changes to the on-orbit

(U) The following actions and adjustments have changed the constellation impacting COMEX FA.
COMEX FA status since the FY 2008 CBIB:
—FOP-CESRETIOFINOFERNHESKI—


—FOP-GEGRETHOIFINOFORNHES—

(U) GEOINT/SIGINT INTEGRATED GROUND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT
(U) SIGINT APPLICATION AND INTEGRATION

° (UPOWO) Development and integration of
ities across the extended SIGINT ae ae via

i


i

:

___ =
| —_

(U) Changes from FY 2008 CBJB

* (U) Spacecraft models were updated for on-orbit status changes and
revised end-of-life predictions.


Low Altitude Integration & Support (continued)

Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account

FY 2007 - FY 2009

‘This Display is SRERET/PALENT RE YHOLE/NOFORN

FY 07 FY@3 FY 09

(Dats tending within he applicable altar depertment badge. "
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.


(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account
FY 2007 - FY 2009

This Display is SECRET/NOFORN

(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed wo the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.


SIGINT HIGH

Ui
a



—FOP-BEGRETISIFICINOFORNIES———

(U) ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT
(U/FOUO) SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT

‘This Exhibit is SECRET//TALENT KEYHOLE//NOPORN ‘Totals may not add due to rounding

(U) Description © (U/FOUS) Provide guidance to evolving NRO program offices on

spectrum matters.

* (U/FOUS) Provide immediate, emergency support in response to
es ‘onal ‘08.



—FOPR-GECRETHEIFAGINGFORNHBE——

(U) Acquisition Summary (U) Major Contractors

(U) Independent Cost Estimate


é
:
E



~FOP-GEGRETIGHHGINOFORNHESNt —
(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

122 “TOP SECRETISUTIINOPORNZEXT


UGA Processing Development (continued)

FY 07 FY 68

0) All ili pero etary 7 an the Extrpriee Management HC in FY 2008 end FY 2002

(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP poritions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.



‘schedule delay to the launch date are attributed to launch-reiated

5 (U/POUOTRRRRER of schedule delay to the launch date are attributed to Iaunch-related
delays,


FOR SECRETHSUTKINORORNHOEX
(U) LAUNCH EXPENDITURE CENTER

125 —FOP-SECRETISITICINOFORN/25K1-——




‘This Bahibit is SBERETATALENT KEY HOLEHNOPORN —

§ (U/POBE) Error in FY 2007 CBIB value - correct value now shown.

401 —FOR-GEGRETHSIFACINGFORNHBEKT


TOP’ SECRETISUTRIINOFORINTZSXT

(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

Next Generation

Bua Higby Apropaton ccmnt

FY 2007 - FY 2009

This Display is SECRET//TALENT KEVHOLE/NOFORN—

FY 07 FY FYo

(U) All elvilian personel dollars were incorporated in the Personnel BC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.

(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.



1 (U) The values within the parentheses in the actual column denote the number of
‘programs that met the target, and the total number of programs.

(U) Appropriation Type
(U) Capital Assets and Service Acquisition

(WU) Findings

(U) Finding 1: The purpose of the IMINT Program is clear. It
addresses a current and relevant need; it is not currently duplicative of
other public or private sector efforts; and its ouputs do reach the


—FOR-GEGRETISGNOFORNAEEX4——

(U) Acquisition Summary
(U) Independent Cost Estimate

(WU) Major Contractors

en
ed
Fn EE
____
Ere
A


—FOR-SECRETVEHFGINOFORMHREXt ———

(U) GEOINT STATIONS
(U) GEOINT STATION INTEGRATION & SUPPORT

‘This Exhibit is SHEREEYNOPORN-— ‘Totals may not add due to rounding

(U) Description

(U) The Integration and Support project provides resources to
accomplish the following actions:

* (U) Systems engineering Contract Advisory and Assistance

Services/ Systems Engineering and Technical Analysis

(CAAS/SETA) for GEOINT Stations operations.

* (U) Integration, readiness, and verification activities in support of

GEOINT/SIGINT developments and satellite launches

* (U) Product quality assurance.

* (U) Government personnel travel, mission training, and
non-monetary awards.

ed —FOP-BEORETHOITICINOFORNIESHA—


(U) Performance Measures

374 —FOP-BEGRETIOIFICINOFORNHESNA——


FOR BEGRETHIEUFIANOFORNHZEX4 —

GEOINT/SIGINT tategrated Ground Development, Englocerng, and Management BC Budget Structure Cromwalk :
Exhibit is SECRET/TALENT REYHOLE/NOFORN-———

‘(U) Positions do not include CLAP positions,
(U) Includes Omnibus Bridge funding if applicable to Program.

180 —TFOP-SECRET/SHTICINOFORNAZSNT—




Resource Exhibit Ne. 2A (continued) zt

Funds & Capabaity
Fr FY DOL
‘This Exhibit i

a3 “TOP SECRETISUTIOINOPORNZSXT


“This Figure is SECAETITRCENT Keynoce i oleh A
Figure 21. TM “


TOP-SECRET TINOPORNT2EXT ——

(U) ENTERPRISE IT

(U) The Enterprise IT Budget Category includes funding for the distribution, dissemination, information sharing, and communications for IC elements
and the delivery of information to the appropriate customer for use in the production of intelligence or in execution of a national security mission. The
table below displays the funding and contribution of this Budget Category’s Expenditure Center to performance areas, including the NIS mission
objectives,



Launch Operations and Engineering (continued)

(U) All personnel dollars are incorporated in the Personne! EC in FY 2007 and FY 2008 and in the Enterprise Management BC in FY 2009.
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.

140 —FOP-BEGRETIOIICINGFORNHESK4———$—





THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


FOP-SECRETHSHTICNOFORNH2ZSXT—

* (U) Perform cross-directorate systems engineering, architecture, * (U) Support customer requirements, baseline configuration control,
business planning, and coordination between NRO and IC to ensure FISMA, and Management Control Program to ensure processes
compatibility and commonality. . include the necessary internal controls to mitigate risk of fraud,

waste, and mismanagement of resources.

(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 ~ FY 2009

(U) All civilian personnel ‘were incorporated in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2008 and FY
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CLAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.

204 —FOP-SECRET/SIFOINOFORNI2ENt—


M8 aT



148


THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


“FOP-SEGRETISHACNOFORNHEEXt———

(U) RESOURCE EXHIBITS

Page
1. Schedule of Authorization & Appropriation,

FY 2009 Request 0.0... 00.0sccccecnececeeeenenes 409
2A. Funds by Discipline & Capability,

FY 2007- FY 2013............ 4
2B. Positions by Discipline & Capabilit

FY 2007 — FY 2009... 2.20... see eee cece cece ee ee 414
3. Positions by Expenditure Center, FY 2007- FY 2009... 416
4. Funds by Expenditure Center & Appropriation Account,

FY 2007 — FY 2013 ........ ccc cee ce cee e eee reer ee Aly
5. Positions by Service/Agency & Position Type,

FY 2007 — FY 2009 2.0... . secs cece eee e eee eeeee 419
6A. Funds by Service/Agency, FY 2007 - FY 2013. . 420
6B. Positions by Service/Agency, FY 2007 ~ FY 2009 421
7A. Positions by Expenditure Center & Position Type,

FY 2007 Actual... -- 26-0. c cece cece eee e cece e eee 422
7B. Positions by Expenditure Center & Position Type,

FY 2008 Authorized... ....-... 000 esse tee eee cena 423
7C. Positions by Expenditure Center & Position Type,

FY 2009 Request 0.20.0... cece eect ee cece nee e neces 4%

8. Funds by Appropriation Title & Account,
FY 2007 FY 2013.00... 0... e eee eee ee ee serene

9A. Funds by Expenditure Center, Program Element
& Appropriation Title, FY 2007 Actual ...............-

9B. Funds by Expenditure Center, Program Element,
& Appropriation Title, FY 2008 Appropriated...........

9C. Funds by Expenditure Center, Program Element,
& Appropriation Title, FY 2009 Request

10. Recap of Enacted FY 2008 Appropriations by
Expenditure Center ...... sss eceeceeceeeeeeeeeseees

11. FY 2008 Appropriation to FY 2008 Request by
Expenditure Center .........6 0000. cece eee e ence eee

12. FY 2007 Major Contractors by Expenditure Center ......

13. Authorized & Filled Military Positions by
Service/Agency & Position Type .

14. Crosswalk to DoD Budget Line Numbers
(@-1, R-1, SAG), FY 2009 Request......... 6.6.0 e eee

15A. Lands and Structures: IMINT, FY 2007 - FY 2009 .......
15B. Lands and Structures: SIGINT, FY 2007 — FY 2009 .
15C. Lands and Structures: Other, FY 2007 — FY 2009 ...

Page

425
426
427
428
429

430
431

433

434
435
436
437




Logistics (continued)

Borat pb Approration Aco

FY 2007-FY

Ths Dploy is SUCRESTYPPL-ENT-REYHOLE/NOPORN—

FYO7 FY 08 FY09

{U) Alpena ells ae incorporate i the Penoel C in 206 and FY 2007 adn he Enis Management Hin FY 2008,

(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.

315 —FOP-BEGRETIGIFHINOFORNH2EK+—


397 : —FOP-BESRETISIICINGFORNHESNT—


FOP SECRET/SITIOINOFORNTZSXT—

© (U) The GEOINT Ground Operations project provides tailored
products to meet key military and national intelligence needs. Some
examples of these tailored products are:

184 —TFOP-SECRETISIFHINOFORNHES A —


(U) Totals may not add due to rounding.


‘This Exhibit is

1 See eee Ot The one the FY 2007 and FY 2008 target values

yer 2011. The correct is now shown for FYs 2007-2012.



47

(U) Description

© (U) System trade studies.

© (U) Requirements analysis.

© (U) Prime contractor design evaluation.

© (U) Modeling and simulation.

 (U) Transition planning/coordination.

« (U) Operations planning/coordination.

© (U) Program/business management support.

* (U) Acquisition support activities, such as engineering change
proposals and acquisition planning.


TOP SECRETHSITHINOPORNIZEXT ——

(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

Advanced Technology

(U) All personne! dollars are incorporated in the Personne! EC in FY 2007 and FY 2008 and in the Enterprise Management BC in FY 2009.

(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget,
(0 CLAP postions are deiled tothe NRO but wuthorized and budgeted within the CLAP.

248 —TFOP-SECRETISITIINOPORNZIAT


“FOP. SEGRETHSHINOFORNHOEXt ——
(U) ENTERPRISE IT SYSTEMS EXPENDITURE CENTER

208 TOP SECRET//SUTK/INOFORN//25X1


‘were incorporated in
(Us Mapes tundine i within dhe applicable miltary deperawemt budget.
‘(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.



FOR SECRETIEITUNORORNHAEXA——

FY 2009 Mission Objectives Funding Summary

Tia igre tec sonnyeome

Figure 1.



FOP-GECRETISITACNOFORNHESHt—

(U) RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY
(U) APPLIED RESEARCH

(U) Description

(U) The Applied Research project funds the NRO's advanced
research and development (AR&D) activities which enable evolutionary
and revolutionary capability improvements to current and future
GEOINT, SIGINT, communications, and ground systems. AR&D
efforts funded by this project are focused on rapidly developing the
technologies to enable the following six capabilities:

* (U) Reconnaissance: Enhance collection to enable rapid location of

suspected {asBets over wide areas, increasing effective persistence and

automated search.

. (U) Surveillance of Known Taeats: Use new sources and methods
to improve our ability to monitor the status of known threats and
areas of interest.

* (U) Detect Radio Frequency (RF) Sources: Increase our ability to
detect low power RF sources over very wide areas with greater
sensitivity.

* (U) Information On-Demand: Provide net-centric interconnectivity
and high bandwidth to ensure information is available anywhere on
demand.

© (U) Value-Added Information: Deliver value-added information by
integrating and processing products from various collection systems.
* (U) Cross-cutting Technologies: Develop innovative and adaptive
capabilities to meet global challenges.

244

may not add due to ing.

(U) AR&D efforts under development within this project can be

further aligned to the principal mission area supported:

* (U) GEOINT Technology.

* (U) SIGINT Technology.

+ (U) Communications Technology.

* (U) Crosscutting Technology.

(U) Examples of specific technologies for each mission area include

but are not limited to:

() GEOINT Technology



4n3_vot A

Figure 6.

a


FOP-GEGRETSHFACINGFORNHESA

(U) Acquisition Summary
(U) Major Contractors

i
———————

(U) Independent Cost Estimate



—FOP-SEGRETISIFOINGFORNA2SXt —_$£§$

(U) SPACE COMMUNICATIONS
(U) RELAY READINESS & LAUNCH

© (U) Maintain and monitor vehicles for health and safety functions.

+ (U) Maintain all required test and ground equipment at factory and
launch sites.

* () Perform all planning for spacecraft integration for launch.

© (U) Perform all systems engineering required to support launch
planning, rework, and anomalies.

* (U) Perform all required test activities for call-up or readiness
activities.

* (U) Perform all required re-work resulting from latent problems or
defects from the development contract identified after vehicle
sell-off.

© (U) Upgrade aging subsystem test equipment and perform rework
due to equipment anomalies.

* (U) Replenish component parts inventory to accommodate vehicle
© (U) Support satellite shipments to launch site, launch vehicle

system integration, and final preparation through launch of the
spacecraft, both in the factory and at the launch base,

121 —“TOP-SECRETHSITIONOPORN ZEN T—


215

TERRESTRIAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK
FY 2009-2013

‘This Figure le SSOREWHALENTEYHOLEMMOFORN—


—FOP-BEORETIBIFRHINGFORNHEENt—

(U) EPF—Eastem Processing Facility. Scheduled for completion in
FY 2009, the EPF will be the primary NRO facility for processing and
preparing spacecraft for launch from the Eastern Range.

(U) ERP—enterprise resource planning.

(U) ESD—earliest service date.

(U) FA—functional availability. A measure of system performance that

incorporates both improved estimates of satellite life and addresses user
requirements.

//FOUS)

(U) FASM—Focused Area SIGINT Mapping. One of three FA curves
used to describe the system performance of IOSA high altitude

spacecraft.
(U) FFRDC—Federally Funded Research and Development Center. A
non-profit corporation, sponsored by the government, for the purpose of

(U) FISMA—Federal Information Security Management Act.

(U) FSR—final spacecraft review.
(U) Gbps—Gigabits per second (10° bits per second).

(U) GEO—geosynchronous orbit. An orbital regime at approximately
22,000 nautical miles characterized by its 24-hour orbital period which
places an object in a stationary position relative to the Earth's rotation.

(U) GEOINT—Geospatial Intelligence.

(U) GMM—Ground Mission Manager.
(U) GOA—-Government of Australia.
(U) GSB—Generation of Secret Bits.

(U) GSM—Global System for Mobile Communications or Groupe
Speciale Mobile. A commercial digital telephone network standard
developed in the carly 1990's in Europe and now implemented
worldwide.

(U) HEO—highly elliptical orbit. A highly non-circular orbit
characterized by a maximum altitude of 25,000 nautical miles and
12-hour orbital period.

(U) Hi—Horizontal Integration

(U) HR—human resources.
(U) HVT—high value target.

441 —POP-SRCRETHSYTIINOPORI254 1 ——


Geom io epean Come |
FY 2008 Appropriation to FY 2009 Request by Project
This Exhibit is

p_EC_GE_TBL_FYOTAppropEYOsRecqaesProj fa




FOP BEERETISIENOFORNHZSNt —
(U) COLLECTION AND OPERATIONS

(U) The Collection & Operations Budget Category includes funding to sustain or enhance overhead reconnaissance systems that enable the NRO and
IC elements to collect, disseminate, and share information with the appropriate customer for use in the production of intelligence or in execution of a
national sccurity mission. The table below displays the funding and contribution to performance areas, including the National Intelligence Strategy
mission objectives.

15 —TOR-GECRETHEIGNOFORNAZEX4—




THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


Launch Vehicles (continued)

Budget Highlights by Apprepriation Account
FY 2007- FY 2009
‘This Display is SEERET/TALENT KEYHOLE/NOFORN —
FY 07 FY 08 FY 09
personnel dol in in

133 —FOP-GECRETIGIFCINOFORNHEEA $$



(U) Toeals may not add due 10 rounding,

‘¢Doltars in Millions)



System Engineering: Communications (continued)

Budget
FY 2007 - FY 2009
This Display is SECRET/TALENT KE YHOLE/NOFORN

FY07 FY 08 Fy 09

(Q) Allan peromne Soller were incorporated in he Feronnel BC in FY 2007 andthe Extras Management Hin FY 2505 sa FY 209.

eee tao NRO bat val department budget.
CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.



(U) All civilian personnel dollars were incorporated in the Personnel BC in the FY 2006 and FY 2007 CBJBs and are in the Enterprise Management EC in the FY 2008 CBIB.
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CLAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.







IMINT Electro-Optical Systems

Figure &.




144
—FOR-SECRETISITKINORORMAEX4—


~FOP-SEERETISIHTICINOFORNHESKT—

(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.

240 —FOP-BEGRETIOIFROINGFORNIESt—


—“TOP-SECRETHISUTICINGFORNHZEXT

(U) COMM—NRO Communications Directorate.
(U) COMSAT—communications satellite.

(U) COMSEC—communications security. Hardware and firmware
devices and accompanying software used to encrypt/decrypt data.

(U) CS/CS—cross-site/cross-system. A term used in conjunction with
the capability to manage multiple systems over various locations.

(U) CSB—common software baseline.

(U) CSPAR—Central Strategic Processing Analysis and Reporting.
(U) CSS—Central Security Services. Ran by NSA and formerly known
as Regional Security Operations Centers (RSOC).

(U) DAR Recap—data acquisition and routing recapitalization.

(U) DCGS—-Distributed Common Ground System.
(U) DIB—DCOGS Integrated Backbone.
(U) DICES—Digital Integrated Communications Electronics System.

Intelligence
with advanced technology concepts for future systems.
(U) DLA—Defense Logistics Agency.

(U) DMS—Defense Messaging System. A DoD and IC standards-based
messaging architecture scheduled to replace the Site

organizational
Communications Processor system.

(U)El—echelon 1. Immediate maintenance activities. supporting

operational systems.

(U) E2—~echelon 2. Factory maintenance in support of ongoing
ie systems.

(U) EA—Enterprise Architecture. Primary purpose of EA is to ensure

that business strategy and IT investments are aligned. As such, EA

allows traceability from the business strategy down to the underlying

technology.

(U) EAAF—Enterprise Architecture Assessment Framework. Uses

thirteen assessment criteria to evaluate the maturity and effectiveness of

agency enterprise architecture programs.

(U) EC—expenditure center.

(U) BELV—Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle. The name for the

family of launch vehicle, which replaced the Titan and Atlas (II and III)
launch vehicles. The EELV vehicle family is comprised of multiple
configurations of the Lockheed-Martin Atlas V and the Boeing Delta IV.

(U) EKMS—Electronic Key Management System. Interoperable
collection of systems developed to automate planning, ordering,
generating, distributing, storing, filing, using, and destroying of
Floctronia key and manegement of other types of COMSEC material.
(U) ELC—EELV Launch Capability contract.

(U) EMOC—Enterprise Management Operation Center. A 24-hour
operational facility that monitors, defends, and controls the information
entesptise for the NRO.

(U) EO—electro-optical.



‘sennd_yolt ata


——-FOP-SECRETISIFICANOFORNHES————

(U) PROGRAM ASSESSMENT RATING TOOL (PART) SUMMARY

(U) Program/Activity Evaluated in 2007

(U) Program: National Reconnaissance Program and NRO
Military Intelligence Program
(U) Advanced Systems and Technology (AS&T) Program

(U) Activity Summary/Description

(U) Advanced Systems and Technology (AS&T) conceives and
develops technologies and demonstrates new systems to increase
actionable intelligence in support of the NRO mission and strategic
goals. NRO AS&T’s strategic vision, derived from the NRO Strategic
Framework, is to accelerate the pace of innovative technologies, reduce
the time to market, and develop new sources and methods.

(U) Activity Funding Level ($M)!

‘This Exhibit is SECRETANOPORN
i

(U) Rating: Moderately Effective

Program Purpose and Design 100%
Strategic Planning EXE
‘Program Management 89%
Program Rewults/ Accountability 61%
Overall Weighted Score 30%
‘This Exhibit is UNCLASSIFIED



FOR SECRETISITGINOFORNHOEKT-

(U) Consolidated Employment Plan and Strategy

(U) The Consolidated Employment Plan concept currently focuses on
civilian positions and personnel funded by each agency. However,
focusing solely on civilian issues presents a limited view of the NRO
workforce requirements given that the military and non-NRP funded
employees represent a large component of the NRO workforce. Thus,
any complete discussion of the NRO workforce would include all
components, to inclide those mentioned above as well as Federally
Funded Research and Development Center, Contract Advisory and
Assistance Services, and Systems Engineering and Technical Analysis
contractors in order to present a complete and accurate description of
issues affecting the workforce.

(U) The NRO has a limited but expanding role in recruiting and
maintaining workforce manpower levels. The nature and complexity of
the NRO workforce demands that we work through partner agencies.
However, the NRO is working to ensure an effective “corporate look” at
the health of the total NRO workforce. With increasing demands for
talent both within the NRO and the partner elements, the NRO is taking
an active approach in all phases of the recruitment process:

© (U) Identifying and defending requirements.

* (U) Participating in efforts to locate potential talent pools.

* (U) Interviewing and selecting candidates for NRO requirements.

* (U) Maintaining contact with applicants throughout the process.

* (U) Bnsuring that positive socialization occurs once applicants

enter on duty with the NRO.

(U) Partner agency workforce initiatives plus demographic and
occupation trends, directly impact the talent pool from which the NRO
draws. For example:

* (U) Changing partner agencies’ staffing policies and priorities

in peet thekeiaeanty to staf existing and new NRO positions

© (U) Deployment of military personnel to support the Global War on

Terror for periods of 6-12 months results in positions that are filled on

paper only.

* (U) Demographic realities of the partner agencies’ workforce are
reflected in the NRO workforce as well.

(U) In response to these challenges, the NRO is implementing a
strategic approach to workforce modeling, aligning short- and long-term
workforce requirements against partner element talent pools, taking into
account workforce demographics and element workforce
strategies to assess impacts on talent available to the NRO. This effort
will provide the data and information required to support requests to
partner elements, the DNI, DoD, or oversight bodies for changes to the
NRO staffing model and/or mix.

(U) In 2006, the NRO and Air Force signed a Statement of Intent,
which included the establishment of the Space Assignment Advisory
Board. The goal of the Advisory Board is to develop a greater pool of
senior space leaders with operations and acquisition experience. In
2007, the NRO and the CIA signed a revised MOA regarding

and development of the CIA workforce at the NRO. The
revised MOA includes initiatives to ensure consistency and equity
across the CIA workforce at the NRO, streamlining workforce
management processes and procedures and delegating authorities to
NRO managers.

(U) FY 2009 Program Build Adjustments

(U) The majority of the new positions requested in this budget will be
civilian Air Force. The NRO has requested an 11 percent increase in
civilian Air Force and Navy positions and a 1 percent increase in
non-OD&E CIA positions. The increase responds to the impact of Air
Force workforce shaping initiatives and

Conprescional eocern to reduce contactor support. The majority ofthe
Air Force civilian increase are in the acquisitions and contracting
occupations and intended to mitigate the reduction in the staffing. The
CIA add is focused on building the NRO's enterprise IT capabilities.

"1 —FOP-BEORETIOIICINGFORNHES


—TOP-SEERETHSIFIOINOFORNIESRT————
(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

Advanced Plans
Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account
FY 2007 - FY 2009
‘This Display s SRERETVPALENT REYHOEE/NOPORN—
FY 67 FY 0s FY

(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.


Figure 18.


(U) Major Contractors

(U) Independent Cost Estimate



(U) Totals may not add due to rounding.


Emitter Mapping 1.0 Acquisition Summary
FY 2006 - FY 2013
This Exhibit is SEGRET/TALENT-KEYHOLE/NOFORA—

(U) FY 2005 — 2008 funds mapped to new budget strecture.
(U) Totals may not add due to rounding.


“FOP-BEGRETIBIFACINGFORNHESI—

(U) GEOINT/SIGINT INTEGRATED GROUND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT
(U) UGA GROUND DEVELOPMENT

‘This Exhibit is SBERETHNOPORN-

(U) Description

(U) The Unified Ground Architecture (UGA) Ground Development
project develops and maintains capabilities that enable planning,
scheduling, and resource control of GEOINT and SIGINT collection,
processing, and information sharing systems. These systems provide a
key interface with the mission partners (NGA and NSA) to receive their
overhead collection requirements, build joint collection strategies, and

(U) Resources in this project will:

185 —FOP-SEGRETIGIFACINGFORNHESKt—


{Dollars in Millions)





THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


167


(U) ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT

(U) Description

(U) The Human Resources project provides resources for personal
services for NRO civilian personnel and human resources (HR) support
and initiatives to improve recruitment, career development, recognition,
retention, and management of the NRO's diverse scientific and
acquisition workforce. This project also includes:

* (U) Resources to reimburse the CIA for non-personal support costs,

travel costs for retirees and new employees, and other non-personal

services costs.

* (U) Resources for the Employee Assistance Program (EAP), which
provides centralized in-house, confidential mental health counseling
and referral services; provides consultation services to managers and
supervisors; and provides workshops and facilitates support groups
on relevant mental health issues.

360%). 255 with te exception ofthe II within the HR project,

275 —TFOP-BECRETHSIFCINOFORNI ES —


UGA Ground Development (continued)
Budget Highlights by Appropriation
FY 2007~ FY 2009
‘This Display is SUCRET/TALENT-KEYHOLENNOFORN—
FY07 FY 08 FY

(U) All civilian personnel 'BC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management BC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.
{Uy MiPer funding it within te applicable altery department budget.
GCap potent dened ote NRO but autre snd bodgeed within the CLAP



FOP SEORETIGHCINOFORNHESH
(U) EMITTER MAPPING PROGRAM 1.0

(U) Acquisition Summary

(U) Major Contractors

» (U) Lockheed Martin, Chantilly, VA: Ground systems integrator.

* (U) Northrop Grumman/TASC, Chantilly, VA: Systems
engineering and technical assistance.

+ (U) Northrop Grumman, Aurora, CO: Emitter mapping
development, maintenance, and integration.

* (U) Raytheon, Garland, TX: Data acquisition and data
management.

 (U) Scitor, Aurora, CO: Rapid prototyping and development.

(U) Independent Cost Estimate



—FOP-QECRETHSIFICINOFORN/25X1-—

(U) ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT
(U) HEADQUARTERS MANAGEMENT

‘This Exhibit is SBERETYNEPORN— ‘Totals may not add due to rounding

(U) Description

(U) The Headquarters Management project provides executive level
management and staff support for developing and issuing guidance,
reviewing and evaluating program performance, allocating and
distributing resources, and conducting intermediate- and long-range
planning, programming and budgeting. This project includes diverse
management functions such as support to the Director's office, General
Counsel, Equal Employment and Diversity Management, Inspector
General, and Business Plans and Operations—Contracts, Acquisition
Center of Excellence, Cost Group, Policy, Strategic Communications,
Center for the Study of National Reconnaissance, and Resource
Management.

en —FOP-SECRETISITIUINOFORNZENt ———_—


410 —~TOPSECRETISUTRINOFORINZ5XT


TOP SECRETISITRINOPOMNIZERT—

(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 — FY 2009
Education & Training
Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account
FY 2007 - FY 2009
This Display is SECRETANOPORN—
FY 07 Fy 0s FY09

(U) All civilian personne! dollars were incorporated in the Personnel BC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.


—FOP-BEGRETHOHRGINOFORNHESHE
(U) SPACE COMMUNICATIONS EXPENDITURE CENTER



(U) LAUNCH
(U) ADVANCED PLANS

‘This Exhibit is SBEREEYNOFORN———— ‘Totals may not add due to rounding

(U) Description

(U) The Advanced Plans project funds engineering and risk
reduction analysis and activities for NRO satellites. Specifically, the
Advanced Plans project activities include:

© (U) Engineering activities affecting multiple satellite missions on

one or multiple launch systems.

° (U) Early investigation and analyses of advanced launch systems

for potential NRO application.

© (U) Early integration of NRO systems on new launch vehicles.

* (U) Launch vehicle performance and acquisition trades for new

research and development programs.

* (U) Analysis of other innovative space lift concepts for potential
launch of NRO payloads, including reusable launch vehicles.

144 “TOP SECRETISHTICINOFORNH2ZSKt—


-FOR-SECRETISIAKINOFORM2EX4—

(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 ~ FY 2009

‘Spectrum Management

Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account

FY 2007—FY 2009

This Display is SEERETHTALENT KE YHOEEANOPORN

‘(U) All civilian personnel ‘were incorporated in in and ia
(U) CLAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized end budgeted within the CIAP.



FOP SECRETHOHTHINOFORNHES-
(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

‘re incorporated
(OoMilPer funding i witha the tplicable military department budget.
{UDCIAP poclions we dead toe NRO tt mtd od budgeed within the CIAP.

92 TOP SECRETISUTIOMOPORNZEXT—


Logistics (continued)
Budget Highlights by Appropriation Accoent

FY 2007 - FY 2009

This Display is SRERET/PALENT KEYHOLEANOPORN-

FY 07 FY 08

‘(U) All personne! dollars are incorporated in the Personnel EC in FY 2006 and FY 2007 and in the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2008.

(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CLAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.



(WU) All civilian personnel dollars were incorporated in the Personnel EC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management BC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP potitions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.

220 —FOR-GEGRETIGIFACINOFORNHEENA—



UGA Processing Development (continued)
Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account
FY 2007 - FY 2009
This Display is SECRIEE/FALENT KEVHOLEMNOFORN—
FY 07 FY 08 FY 09

(Uy All civilian personne! do
{U) MaPers fooning is whine applicable military
a ears ae tae to he NRO ba alpricd undbad ged within the CLAP

194 —FOP-GEGRETIOHFCINOFORNHESA—


—FOP-GEGRETIOFAGINOFORNHESK-

(U) SIGNALS COPY AND EXPLOITATION 1.0

(U) Acquisition Summary (U) Major Contractors

¢ (U) BIT Systems, Herndon, VA. FISINT processing development.

* (U) Lockheed Martin, Chantilly, VA: Ground systems integrator.

» (U) Northrop Grumman/TASC, Chantilly, VA: Systems engineering
* (U) Raytheon, State College, PA: Strategic indications and warning
processing development.

* (U) Raytheon, Aurora, CO: PROFORMA processing development.
© (U) Rincon Research, Tucson, AZ: Manage common software
baseline and signal processing components.

* (U) SAIC, Columbia, MD: Applied technology development.

© (U) Zeta Associates, Fairfax, VA: Signals copy and exploitation
development and integrator.

(U) Independent Cost Estimate



TOP SECRETISHTIINOPORN 2951 —

FY 2007 NRP Civilian Workforce



THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


“TOP SECRETHSUTIOINOPFORNT2SXT
(U) SIGINT HIGH ALTITUDE FOCUSED-AREA SIGINT MAPPING (FASM) FUNCTIONAL AVAILABILITY

(U) SIGINT FASM Functional Availability Mission Statement: (U) Changes from FY 2008 CBIB

(U) The following actions and adjustments have changed the FASM
FA status since the FY 2008 CBJB:

* (U) Spacecraft models were updated for on-orbit status changes and
revised end-of-life predictions.

(U) FASM Vehicle Highlights

(U) There have been no significant changes to the on-orbit
constellation impacting FASM FA.

+ <6
Se
ee
i
a

967 TOP SECRET/SIFOINOFORNHZENt


(0) Allcvillan personne dollars were incorporued inthe Personne) Bis FY 2007 andthe Enterprise Management

(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U)CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.

188 —FOP-BEGRETIOVACINGFORNHESK4+—§$


103


224

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


Facilities (continued)

Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account

FY 2007 — FY 2009

This Display is SUCRETTALENT KEYHOCEINOFORN

‘(U) Alll personne! dollars are incorporated in the Personne! EC in FY 2007 and FY 2008 and in the Enterprise Management BC in FY 2009.

(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable militery department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.

a



“TOP SECRETHSHTRUINOPORNIZSXT —

(U) ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT
(U) SYSTEMS ENGINEERING: SIGINT

“Totals may not add due to rounding

(U) Description

* (WU) Defines the overhead SIGINT Strategic Improvement
Roadmap, which identifies near and far-term enhancements for IOSA
and post-IOSA space, ground, and communication technologies.

= (U) Collaborates with NSA’s Office of Overhead, other NRO
organizations, and other IC organizations to define the future

(U) In addition, the Systems Engineering: SIGINT project: architecture on behalf of the SIGINT Directorate.
* (U) Provides architectural-level systems engineering within the * (U) Provides the technical analysis and represents the NRO for
SIGINT Directorate to effectively integrate IOSA. overhead SIGINT related IC studies.

(U) The Systems Engineering: SIGINT project provides funding for
CAAS and FFRDC support, as well as for personnel travel, mission
training, and awards recognition.

301 —FOP-SEORETISHFICINGFORNHESHt-—




‘dollars were incorporated in the Personnel EC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management BC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.

ivilian personnel
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.



1 (U) The FY 2006 actuals for Long-term and Annual Acquisition Cost Growth and
are updated to the Baseline Agreement and Acquisition Report

‘The preliminary FY 2007 ectuals for Longerm and Annual

‘Acquisition Cost Growth and Schedule Growth are based upon end of FY 2007 data,


FY 07 FY 08 FY09

(VU) MilPers fondi awn te applicable miliary department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and bud geted within the CLAP.



(0) All peep dll ae incorporate Pencnscl EC nF 2007 a 2008

(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.

19




—FOP-SEERETHSHTIONOFORNHZSAT—
(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

Applied Research
Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account
FY 2009

This Display is SECRETVPALENT- KEY HOEEANOFORN——

FY 07 FY 08 FY 09

(U) All pertnne dolla re incorporse the Personen BC in FY 207 ead FY 2008 sad in the Eaierpio Management Cin FY 2909

(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CLAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.


Expenditure Center Performance Sununary: SIGINT High



(GW) Alt vilanpernonel doa were ncorporsnd in the Peronnel BC in FY 2007 andthe Enterprise Management BC in FY 2008 ead FY 2009,

(U) MilPecs fanding is within the applicable military department budget,
(0) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.

201 —FOP-GEGRET/GHACINOFORNHES—


Facilities & Logistics Expenditure Center |

FY 2008 Appropriation to FY 2009 Request by Project
This Exhibit is

‘VO4P_BC_PL_TBL FYO7ApproprYO8RaqectsPro} fm


4 (U) The values within the parentheses in the actual column denote the number of programs
that met the target, and the total number of programs.

(U) Appropriation Type
(U) Capital Assets and Service Acquisition

(U) Findings

(U) Finding 1: The purpose of the NRO SIGINT Program is clear. It
addresses a current and relevant need; it is not duplicative of other
public or private sector efforts; and its outputs reach the intended
beneficiaries.

ra
(SHEKS




7


416
“TOP-SEORETISIFCINOFORNIHESKt—


‘This Exhibit is’

' a



—~“FOP-SEERETISHTIOINOFORNI2SA tt —————

(U) SIGINT STATIONS EXPENDITURE CENTER

161 FOP SEORETHOIFFIGINOFORNHESHA——


POP-SECRETHSHTIONOPORNHZSX1——

(U) RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY EXPENDITURE CENTER





‘Space Communications Expenditure Center (continued)
Resource Summary by Project & Appropriation

FY 2007 - FY 2013

‘This Exhibit is SHCRET/FALENT-KEVHOLE/NOFORN—

100 TOP SECRETISHTIONOPORNZ9X 1




TOPSECRET/SITINOPORNNZEXT—
(U) SIGINT LOW EXPENDITURE CENTER

(U) The table below displays selected IC-wide measures developed to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of NIP activities for this expenditure
center (EC) in relation to funding and alignment to performance areas. Targets for some measures are under development. The succeeding table
summarizes project-specific past performance information.

51 —FOR-SECRETISITUINOFORNIREKt——


—FOP-SECRETISHTICINGFORNT2SXT-
(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 — FY 2009

High-Altitude Integration & Support
Budget

(U) MilPers funding ia within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.



Resource Exhibit No. 2B (coutianed) Pe
Reconnaissance Program

National
Positions

415 —FOP-GEGRETIEIFACINOFORNHESH4—


FOP-SEECRETHISHTIOINOFORNHZSXT-—

(U) RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY
(U) BASIC RESEARCH

(U) Description

(U) The Basic Research project provides funding for new and
innovative sources and methods through the Director’s Innovation
Initiative (DID), the Innovative Solutions Initiative (ISI), and white
papers proposed by industry, academia, other government organizations,
and laboratories.

(U) The Dil solicitation provides unclassified access to revolutionary
R&D concepts and provides a risk-tolerant environment to invest in
cutting edge technologies and high-payoff concepts relevant to the
NRO’s mission. Examples include investigating tunable SIGINT filter
technologies, developing faster and more efficient
maneuvering algorithms, and using carbon nanotube-based fabrics in
integrated circuits to reduce circuit size without increasing power
Developers, both traditionally and non-traditionally associated with the
NRO, are provided the opportunity to participate in building the NRO of
the 21* century.


—FOP-SEORETISIFAC/NOFORNHESHt—

(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

‘(U) All civilian personnel dollars were incorporated in the Personnel BC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management BC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.


FOP-SECRETHSHTIOMNOPORNG ZINA

(U) SIGINT STATIONS
(U) SIGINT GROUND OPERATIONS

(U) Description

(U) The SIGINT Ground Operations project includes resources to:
(U) The SIGINT Ground Operations project satisfies key military and
© (U) Support to military operations.



‘This Figure ie SEORETITREENTCEYHOLEINOPORN- 0812 eA WT. 0}


(U/POUEO) Finding 11: As of the FY 2006 PART evaluation, the
COMM Program met most of its long-term and annual goals.

» (U//POUO}The Program is meeting annual goals and is on track to
meet the long-term targets for Terrestrial Network Capacity.

© (U/FFQ@UO) The Program is demonstrating efficiencies in achieving
Program goals each year.

(U/FOUO) Finding 12: NRO COMM has established the following
additional measures, with baselines and targets, which are not reflected

in the measures summary tables.

SSO) Deng EY 20k FY 2006, the COMM Program met

* (U/FOBO) The COMM Program gathers Patriot contract metrics
on a monthly basis to determine contractor performance, and holds
objectives.

(U) Follow-Up Actions (Improvement Pian)

(U) The COMM Program continues to implement the following
actions to improve the performance of the Program.

< (STEINE


‘Launch Vehicles (coutinued)

Fy 07 FY 08 FY09

‘(U) All personnel dollars are incorporated in the Personnel EC in FY 2007 and FY 2008 and in the Enterprise Management BC in FY 2009.
(0) Mubers Ieting ie within the spelicable mtbiary doparenent budge.


18

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


41 —TFOP-SECRETISYTIINOFORNIZSNT—


FOR. SEGRETHSITKANOFORNH25X4——$
(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

lian personnel dollars were incorporated in the Personnel BC in FY 2007 snd the Enterprise Management BC in FY 2008 and FY 2009,
(U) MilPezs funding is within the applicable military department budget,
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.


—FOR-GEGRETIEIFCINOFORMHIEX4+——

(U) Accommodation Procurement

218 —FOP-BEGRETIOACINOFORNIESH-———$


(0) LAUNCH
(U) LAUNCH VEHICLES

‘This Exhibit is SECRETWNOPORN ‘Totals may not add duc to rounding

(U) Description

(U) The primary purpose of this project is to procure EELV and
conduct integration activities for NRO satellites. The NRO procures
standard EELV hardware on a fixed price basis, fully funded two years
prior to launch. Well-defined mission unique hardware plus integration
efforts are incrementally funded beginning up to five years in advance of
the launch date. The structure of the EELV contracts allows separate
funding and accounting for NRO missions. The NRO has procuring
contracting officer and contracting officer's technical representative
authority for all NRO delivery orders on the Air Force EELV contracts.

(U) Schedules for Launch Vehicles are as follows:

2

I,

131 FOP GEORETIOHIGINGFORNHESNT—


eo

FY 2007-FY 2009
‘This Display is SECRET/ TALENT KEYHOLESNOFORN

FY 07

FY 08

(U) All personne] dollars are incorporated in the Personnel BC in FY 2007 and FY 2008 and in the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2009.

(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CIAP.

115 —FOR-GEGRETISIFAGINOFORNA2EKA—

FY 09



261


*(U) FY 2005 — 2008 funds mapped to new budget structure.
(WU) Totals may not add due to rounding.


© (U//PORO) Provides NRO field representatives to US government
agencies and COCOMs to facilitate the exchange of information,
requirements and access to collection capabilities.

* (U) Provides users with innovative, technical and multidiscipline
solutions to priority operational and intelligence problems.

* (U) Provides advanced technology prototyping to meet rapid
response requirements.

(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 — FY 2009

NRO Mission Support
‘Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account
FY 2007-FY 2009

‘This Display ts SECRETHNOFORN——

(U) All civilian personnel dollars were incorporated in the Personne! EC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management EC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.



FOR-SECRET/SIFKNOFORNHEEKA—

(U) SPACE COMMUNICATIONS
(U) SPACE OPERATIONS DEVELOPMENT SEGMENT

‘This Exhibit is SBCREE/EALENTIGYHOLEANOPORN

(U) Description

(U) The Space Operations Development Segment project provides
funding for ground activities supporting command and control (C&C)
and data dissemination for space-based communications systems.
Specifiealy this project provides resources to support:



THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


Advanced Technology Development (continued)
Budget Highlights by Appropriation Account

OF All personnel dollars are incorporated in the Persounel BC in FY 2007 and FY 2008 and in the Enterprise Management BC in FY 2009.

(U) MilPers funding ia within the applicable military department budget.
(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.



Performance Associated
‘Measure Projects
‘No performance
measures were
used against this
EC prior to
FY 2008.

Impact on Performance Areas"/

FY 2007 Results are preliminary.
* Indicates Program Assestment Rating Tool (PART) Measure.

‘+ Targets under review.
| Bxcludes Omaibus Bridge Funding if applicable to Program.
-Assessment ey



Resource Exhibit No. 14 [|

National Reconaissance Program (NRP)

Cromwalk to DoD Budget Line Numbers (P-1, R-1, SAG)
FY 2009 Request

‘This Exhibit s SRERET———

‘VO4P_SEC_ResourceExhibit4.fm


“TOP-SECRETISUTHINOPORNNZSX T —
(U) BUDGET OVERVIEW

es : —_—

(U) Budget Request Highlights

(U) The major changes within the NRP for FY 2009 are:
© (U) Increased funding in



FOP-GEGRETHSITHUINOFORNAREKT—
(U) Budget Changes FY 2007 - FY 2009

(U) CIAP positions are detailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.








GEOINT Station Integration & Sappert (continued)

‘(U) All civilian personnel dollare were incorporated in the Personne! BC in FY 2007 and the Enterprise Management BC in FY 2008 and FY 2009.
(U) MilPers funding is within the applicable military department bodget.
(WU) CLAP potitions are detailed to the NRO but anthorized and budgeind within the CIAP.

189 . —TOP-ECRETHBITIINOFORNIZERT —


Launch Expenditure Center (Dollars in Thousands)
FY 2008 Appropriation to FY 2009 Request by Preject
‘This Exhibit is

‘VOdP_BC_LA_TBL_FYOTAppropFYOSRequestPro} fo

126 “TOP SECRETHSUTIINOPORN 29K 1 —


(Oy Al ein personnel dlls wer acpi the Prone EC = FY 207 an he Emterps Managsmen Bin FY 2008 wd FY 2009

MilPers funding is within the applicable military department budget.
(UN CAAP pocisionsare deailed to the NRO but authorized and budgeted within the CLAP.



Space Communications Expenditure Center
FY 2068 Appropriation to FY 2009 Request by Project
‘This Exhibit is SEERETHTALENT-REYHOLEHNOFORN

101 FOR-BEGRETHSVFKINOFORNABEX—


THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


-FOP-BEORETISUTIOINOPORNIZORT
419