alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 6, 2021

NO. 03-21-00001-CV

Jane Vorwerk, Appellant

v.

City of Bartlett and John Landry Pack, Mayor, Appellees

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, TRIANA, KELLY

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on October 6, 2020. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 98-31133

_____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus

DARRELL STALLWORTH,
Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 98-CR-81-ALL

---------------------------

June 4, 1999
Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Darrell
Stallworth has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California
, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Stallworth
has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed

a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
# C_2005116EN.01002601.xml

| 18.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/26

---

Call for proposals SUB 01-2005

(2005/C 116/11)

The Commission is planning to grant subsidies totalling the indicative amount of EUR 250 000 for the organisation of various conferences to promote energy and transport policy and, in particular, the policy priorities fixed in the 2005 Work Programme.

The specific topics selected for 2005 are as follows:

| — | rights and protection of passengers using the various modes of transport and energy users; |
| --- | --- |

—

rights and protection of passengers using the various modes of transport and energy users;

| — | energy demand management in transport and energy, in particular energy efficiency; |
| --- | --- |

—

energy demand management in transport and energy, in particular energy efficiency;

| — | trans-European networks and infrastructure charging; |
| --- | --- |

—

trans-European networks and infrastructure charging;

| — | pan-European transport and energy networks between the European Union and its new neighbours; |
| --- | --- |

—

pan-European transport and energy networks between the European Union and its new neighbours;

| — | safety and security in energy and transport; |
| --- | --- |

—

safety and security in energy and transport;

| — | development of energy and transport markets (trends, competition, constraints, economic aspects); |
| --- | --- |

—

development of energy and transport markets (trends, competition, constraints, economic aspects);

| — | promotion of renewable energies; |
| --- | --- |

—

promotion of renewable energies;

| — | technological innovations in the transport and energy sectors; |
| --- | --- |

—

technological innovations in the transport and energy sectors;

| — | the challenges of nuclear power in the years to come (security, safety, waste management, dismantling, research, etc.). |
| --- | --- |

—

the challenges of nuclear power in the years to come (security, safety, waste management, dismantling, research, etc.).

Information on this call for proposal is available on the DG TREN website at the following address:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/energy_transport/home/calls/proposal_en.htm

---
#### Suzanne Santantonio, Respondent, v Stop & Shop, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[774 NYS2d 738]

*660In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Stop & Shop appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bonina, J.), dated November 26, 2002, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

The plaintiff allegedly slipped and fell on a wet and slippery substance on the floor of the appellant’s supermarket. The plaintiff testified at her deposition that after she fell, she saw a “smear mark like a ridge of wax” on the floor. In opposition to the appellant’s prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact that the appellant either created the alleged dangerous condition, or had actual or constructive notice thereof and a reasonable time to remedy it *(see Negri v Stop & Shop,*65 NY2d 625 [1985]; *Moody v Woolworth Co.,*288 AD2d 446 [2001]). Moreover, the record is devoid of any evidence to establish that the substance complained of was wax, and that a hazardous condition was created by its negligent application *(see Schirripa v Waldbaums Supermarket,*283 AD2d 632 [2001]). Thus, the Supreme Court should have granted the appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.
99-1394.

#### State ex rel. Bristow v. Bryant.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
## NUMBER 13

- 21

- 00 445

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JOSHUA JACOB DAVENPORT

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 36 th District Court

of Aransas County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

This cause is before the court on a ppellant ’s motion to dismiss th is appeal

. We find

the motion meet s the requirement s of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) (1). See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2(a) (1)

. Accordingly, w ithout passing on the merits of the case

, we

grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.2

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant ’ s request, no motion for rehearing will

be entertained

.

GINA M. BENAVIDES

Justice

Do not publish.

T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed on the

3 rd day of February, 202 2

.
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ Al A. GonsoulinAl A. GonsoulinChairman and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2


               CONSENT OF NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.


     We hereby consent to the references to us under captions "Part I, Item 1
and 2.  Business and Properties-Natural Gas and Oil Reserves" in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of The Houston Exploration Company for the year ended
December 31, 1999 and incorporated by reference into the Company's previously
filed Registration Statements on Form S-3, file number 333-78843 dated May 25,
1999 and Form S-8, file number 333-36977 dated October 1, 1997.



NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Houston, Texas
March 22, 2000
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1024/2006

of 5 July 2006         

amending Regulation (EC) No 573/2003 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Decision 2003/18/EC as regards the concessions in the form of Community tariff quotas on certain cereal products originating in Romania and amending Regulation (EC) No 2809/2000

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Decision 2003/18/EC of 19 December 2002 on the conclusion of a Protocol adjusting the trade aspects of the Europe Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Romania, of the other part, to take account of the outcome of negotiations between the parties on new mutual agricultural concessions (1), and in particular Article 3(2) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 573/2003 is amended as follows:

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 July 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 8, 14.1.2003, p. 18.

(2)OJ L 82, 29.3.2003, p. 25. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

----
Compensation
      for Dr. Craig Dionne, President and CEO

    


    February
      11, 2008

    


    At
      the
      meeting of GenSpera’s Board of Directors on February 11, 2008, the Board
      approved an annual salary to Dr. Craig Dionne as President and CEO the sum
      of
      $240,000 per annum effective December 1, 2007.
OFFICE OF THE SE

ARY OF THE AIR FORCE

CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL p ON
Cc. TR BEFSFO 1960 °
ROUTING SLIP
To | Oreice * [Cory is, Orrice
Deputy For PROCUREMENT aD
SAPS Proouctt on
a
I SAS | Deputy For Mateniee Procrms
DEPUTY FOR MILITARY ASSISTANCE
et er Ss ora me —
LSAFFM ~ + AIR TRANSPORTATION
LL DEPUTY FOR MANPOWER, PERSONNEL
: Derury Fon Reseave AnD ROTC
SAF AA 7 ACEAIRS
SARL DEPUTY FOR SecunITY Procraus
SaFol DEPUTY FOR REQUIREMENTS Review
DePuTy ASSistaNT SECRETaRY
Es
SAFIE }
ILE
For | Action Q AR, ” Ino
Suse ense 8.1.5.
Reman s:
yy y VY ;
e GRAMDY
1 . Branch

SAF Fora 14 (nev Fee 5e)

“Bebe!

SAF Nvoee:

= |

(ee



Deputy Scoretar y
otibe Director of Defens:

The
fay MEM Cilice
basis

inf
info

Ing Lo the
B
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 33 (Thursday, February 19, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03427]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 16, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Chapelle Davis, Assistant Vice 
President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. First Mercantile Financial Corporation, to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring 100 percent of the outstanding shares of Putnam 
1st Mercantile Bank, both of Cookeville, Tennessee.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 13, 
2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-03427 Filed 2-18-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
ot•

TALENT-KEYHOLE -TOP-SECRETCOVO00. EnC► 11t2 TOOM 1191041101C VMS

an ► cno tan 10 9005• Ar•in

COMMIR

CV•

aCOPIES

n46t V Pasts

•••••n VH1111 110101,

TALENT-KEYHOL MUM. Villa

NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C. •

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. PACKARD

SUBJECT: General Bennett's Proposal on Decontrol and

Downgrading of Satellite Photography

You have asked for my comments on the subject proposal.

While I recognize the need to derive a maximum utilization of the products of satellite photography, I am concerned,

at this particular time that the advantages to be gained in

the acknowledgement of the "fact of" satellite reconnaissance

at the SECRET level are at the very best extremely minimal.

We are presently engaged in, what we hope to be,

substantive negotiations of a SALT. We have entered these

negotiations with the objective of maintaining the present

tacit acceptance by the Soviets of our satellite reconnaissance activities. The Soviets have overtly described to us

their nervousness and concern about any action on either

their or our part which might jeopardize this present tacit

acceptance.

Our position in these negotiations is based essentially

on the guidance that, except for those limitations clearly

requiring verification through on-site inspection, we would

rely to the maximum extent necessary on verification by

"national means." Our delegation has been instructed,

generally, to offer no further definition or description

of what these means include.

A disclosure of the "fact of" U.S. satellite reconnaissance at the SECRET level, outside a compartmented control

system could have seriously damaging effects on the conduct

of these negotiations or could render any resulting agreement

completely unacceptable.
saws, Ina

-TOP -SEC TALENT-KEYHOL *weft 'glints

•

I believe it prudent to at least delay the discussion

of General Bennett's proposal until we can see more clearly

the progress of the SALT talks and any advantages which

might be gained in the surfacing of the "fact of" our

activities.

John L. MIcLucas

•AIMPU via

TALENT-KEYHOLE C3M11110i. S•i ►ter

COVIlift go

TOP SECRET COP. Of CON'S

►ALltEt ►IO* &Vitra& ti WO salif of $$$$$

IOU 116itt••Irt 515013 NUN va- 4Pri •
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 598/2006

of 18 April 2006         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 April 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 April 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 18 April 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
2004 Small Payload Rideshare 

Conference

The National Reconnaissance Office, the USAF Space and Missile Systems Center/Space Test 

Program Office, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration/Goddard Spaceflight 

Center sponsor the Small Payload Rideshare Conference. This annual conference is designed to 

address the issues related to access to space for small payloads, their potential benefits, and the 

key technologies for achieving affordable access to space.

The 2004 Small Payload Rideshare Conference will be held on May 11-13, 2004, in Anchorage, 

Alaska at the Hilton Anchorage. The conference will include a tour of the Kodiak Launch 

Complex on Kodiak Island.

Sessions will consist of panels on 1) The value of small payloads, 2) What unique applications 

can be filled by small payloads, 3) What are the impediments to realizing the full potential of 

small payloads, and 4) What method of transportation is the key to affordable access to space. In 

addition to the panels, there will be presentations on:

• Status of Force Application and Launch from CONUS (FALCON)

• Kodiak Range Processing for First Time Users

• Protecting Small Payloads from the Dynamic Launch Environment

• Space Test Program-1 EELV Lessons Learned

• STP – Real Estate Broker for All DoD-Related Rideshares, both SERB and Reimbursable

• NanoSat-2 on EELV Heavy Lift Demo – Lessons Learned

• Shuttle/ISS Unique Opportunities through Space Test Program

• DoD Auxiliary Payloads Policy for Heritage and EELVs

• Management Challenges of a Dynamic Multiple Payload Mission Complement

• R&D Responsive Space (RRS) Alliance
• Mission Requirements Development For Rapid Space Satellites Acquisition

• New Launch Vehicles Status

o Microcosm Mini-Sprite

o SpaceDev Streaker SLV

o Peacekeeper

o DARPA Rascal

• Rideshare Opportunities on Taurus

• Payload Compression Technology

• DARPA Activities in Operationally Responsive Spacelift

• Status of EELV Secondary Payload Carriers

If you are interested in attending this year’s conference, please complete the registration form 

and submit to Jim Liller or Capt Rojan Quarles.

There will be a nominal registration fee of $30-$40 to cover the morning social and afternoon 

snack.
13C

- NMR

Sanitized
May 22,2012 U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building ground floor, Room W12-140 1200 NewJerseyAvenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 

## 'r·J,**l,i~)'** 

### 21 i.u L I',JI (:., 

### IQ: 58



### SUBJECT: PETITION FOR EXEMPTION- FAR 121.434(c)(1)(ii)
Reference: DocketNumberFAA-2001-8722 Dear Sir/Madam;
In accordance with the provisions of Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) 11.61, SkyWest Airlines, petitionsfor an extension of Exemption No. 7689E (Docket No. FAA-2001-8722). If granted this exemption would provide relief to the extent necessaryto substitute a qualified and authorized check airman in place of an FAA Inspectorto observe a qualifying pilot in command (PIC) while that PIC is performing prescribed duties during at least one flight that includes a takeoff and landing when completing Initial or Upgrade training as specified in FAR 121.424. Additionallythe proposed Exemption extension, if granted, would allowthe substitution only atthe discretion ofthe certificate holder and only when an FAA Inspector is not immediately available, subjectto certain conditions and limitations. Exemption 7689E will expire on September 30, 2012, unless superseded or amended. Justification for extending this exemption was stated in the original exemption, dated January 3, 2001. SkyWestAirlines continues to expand into its operation and foresees continued growth for an extended period of time. The conditions and circumstances, in regard to public interest and safety, which warranted the original grantof exemption, continue to exist. The Exemption has been used since first granted with no known compromise of safety. Extending this Exemption will not adversely affect safety, but will simply provide an equivalent alternative to an administrative aspect of the stated regulations. Extending this exemption will have no adverse impacton the interests of the aircraft owners oron governmental agencies.

P.OBox22305 SaltLake City, UT84122 801.258.4500 www.skywest.com

# ~. As the renewal ofthis exemption is not precedent setting, SkyWest Airlines requests that publication of our petition in the Federal Register be waived in accordance with Section 11.87(b). The renewal ofthis exemption is nota controversial issue since the reasons and conditions for implementation are identical to Exemption 7689 original issue.

# ~'?~ Tracy Gallo Director Flight Operations Training SkyWestAirlines 801.258.4520

P.OBox22305 SaltLake City, UT84122 801.258.4500 www.skywest.com
# AVS



# Quality Management System Title: Domestic New Action Worbheet with 56 QPM# j'R-ANM-ll30-F7 I Date: December 17, 2008 

## , 

# I Revision 

### 1 

# Record ofContacts 

# :lo\O-OQ37 FDMS DocketNo. FAA-2M ------- With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, IRAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Person Contacted Date Boeing Michael Ho I 4/2812009 ATA Mark Lopc.z I 6/15/2009 I



# , • 

# • • 

# -