alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of Braintech, Inc. (the "Company **"**) on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward A. White, the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Edward A. White

Edward A. White

Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer 

November 4, 2005
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 18

March 23, 1998

Mr. Richard C. Schwenk, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
Telespectrum Worldwide Inc.
443 South Gulph Road
King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406


RE: Form 10-K For the Year Ended December 31, 1997


Dear Mr. Schwenk:

This letter is written to meet the requirements of Regulation S-K calling for a 
letter from a registrant's independent public accountants whenever there has 
been a change in accounting principle or practice.

You have advised us that as of December 31, 1997, the Company changed its method
of measuring goodwill impairment under APB Opinion No. 17 "Intangible Assts",
from an undiscounted cash flow approach to a fair value method based on a
discounted cash flow approach, and that whenever events or circumstances have
occurred that indicate an impairment may have occurred, the Company will
estimate the future discounted cash flows of the business segments to which
goodwill relates. You have further advised us that when such estimate of the
future discounted cash flows, net of the estimated fair value of the tangible
net assets is less than the carrying amount of goodwill, the difference will be
charged to operations. We understand that for purposes of determining future
discounted cash flows of the business segments to which goodwill relates, the
Company, based upon historical results, current projections and internal
earnings targets, will determine the projected operating cash flows, net of
income taxes, of the individual business segments. Management has indicated that
the change to the fair value method based on a discounted cash flow approach is
preferable in that such method most closely approximates the fair value of
goodwill and the related measurement of goodwill impairment.

A complete coordinated set of financial and reporting standards for determining 
the preferability of accounting principles among acceptable alternative 
principles has not been established by the accounting profession. Thus, we 
cannot make an objective determination of whether the change in accounting 
described in the preceding paragragh is to a preferable method. However, we have
reviewed the pertinent factors, including those related to financial reporting, 
in this particular case on a subjective basis, and our opinion stated below is 
based on our determination made in this manner.

We are of the opinion that the Company's change in method of accounting is to an
acceptable alternative method of accounting, which, based upon the reasons 
stated for the change and our discussions with you, is also preferable under the
circumstances in this particular case. In arriving at this opinion, we have 
relied on the business judgement and business planning of your management.

Very truly yours,



Arthur Andersen LLP
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|               |  |                            
|-------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:          |  |                            
|March 10, 2005 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|               |  |                            
|               |  | Marc N. Teal               
|               |  | Principal Financial Officer
|               |  |                            
|               |  |                            
|               |  |                            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

HomeHistoryCryptologic HistoryHistorical FiguresHistorical Figures View

# NSA Historical Figures

                Download            

# Ms. Eunice Russell Willson Rice 

##                 2022 Hall of Honor Inductee            

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

2022Biographyhistorical figurehall of honorMs. Eunice Russell Willson Rice
Executive Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.6.1 
 As of September 1, 2008 
 Jim Sinegal 
 999 Lake Drive 
 Issaquah, WA 98027 
 Dear Jim: 
 This letter agreement confirms the terms of your employment with Costco Wholesale Corporation (the “Company”): 
  

	 1.
	 Employment. The Company employs you as its President and Chief Executive Officer. 


  

	 2.
	 Employment Term. The terms of this letter agreement cover one year, beginning September 1, 2008, and coinciding with the Company’s fiscal year 2009,
unless otherwise terminated as provided below. The parties may renew this letter agreement from year-to-year upon agreement. 


  

	 3.
	 Salary and Benefits. 


  

	 	 (a)
	 You will receive a base salary of $350,000 for fiscal year 2009. The base salary will be paid to you in accordance with the Company’s standard payroll practices.



  

	 	 (b)
	 You will be eligible for a bonus of up to $200,000. The amount of any bonus will be determined by the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee, and will be paid to
you in accordance with the Company’s standard practices. 


  

	 	 (c)
	 You will be eligible for an equity award under the Company’s Third Restated 2002 Stock Incentive Plan or its successor plan. The Board of Directors or the
Compensation Committee will determine the amount of any grant. 


  

	 	 (d)
	 All payments to you will be subject to withholding for taxes and other applicable withholding requirements. 


  

	 	 (e)
	 You will be eligible to participate in the Company’s employee benefit programs, in accordance with the terms and conditions of those programs.



  

	 4.
	 Termination. The Company will have the right to terminate your employment at any time for “cause,” as determined under applicable law and policies of the
Company. You may terminate your employment at any time upon not less than sixty (60) days prior written notice. 










	 5.
	 Miscellaneous. This letter agreement represents our complete agreement on these subjects. We can only amend this letter agreement by signing a written amendment.
This letter will be governed by Washington law in all respects. 


 If you agree with the terms contained in this
letter, please sign the enclosed copy of this letter and return it to me. 
  
  

			
	 Sincerely,
  

	 Compensation Committee of the
 Board of Directors
 Costco Wholesale Corporation

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ HAMILTON E. JAMES

		 	 Director



  

			
	 Acknowledged and agreed:

	
	 /s/    JAMES D.
SINEGAL        

	Jim Sinegal
		
	 Dated:
	 	 9/20/08
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,340
<SECURITIES>                                     1,626
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,228
<ALLOWANCES>                                       354
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,312
<PP&E>                                           3,978
<DEPRECIATION>                                     890
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,451
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            57
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,081
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,450
<SALES>                                         12,346
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,346
<CGS>                                              799
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      799
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (55)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   322
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (49)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    157
<INCOME-TAX>                                        69
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 88
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        88
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
#### Feske, Special Administrator, Respondent, vs. Adam, Appellant.

*April 15*

June *20, 1907.*

*Appealable order: Taxation of costs: Review on appeal from judgment: Bill of exceptions.*

1. An order retaxing costs is not appealable, but is reviewable only on appeal from the judgment.

2. For the purpose of reviewing the taxation of costs a bill of exceptions is necessary, showing what occurred before the court and taxing officer, the items objected tó, and what decision was made thereon.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for-Polk county: A. J. Viatje, Circuit Judge.-

*Affirmed.*

Action in ejectment. The action was dismissed with costs on motion of counsel for the defendant. There was a contest before the clerk on the taxation of costs, the result being carried before the court for review, where a decision was rendered adverse to the appellant and the costs as so taxed were inserted in the judgment. This appeal was taken solely for the purpose of having such decision reviewed. There is no bill of exceptions. The appeal is from the order retaxing the costs as well as from the judgment.

The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *366
      *Frank B. Dorothy,*and for the respondent on a brief signed by *Kennedy & Tates.*

Maeshall, J.

The order retaxing the costs is not appeal-able. That is ruled by many decisions under the present appeal statute, upon the ground that it did not prevent a judgment from which an appeal might 'be taken; but independently thereof it would not be appealable because a re-taxation of costs is not a special proceeding nor a summary application after judgment, nor a matter involving the merits. *Ernst v. Steamer Brooklyn,*24 Wis. 616. Such an order is only reviewable on appeal from the judgment.

The point is made that there being no bill of exceptions neither the proceedings before the clerk nor those before the court are a part of the record and so are not reviewable upon appeal from the judgment. That must be decided in respondent’s favor under the doctrine of *Cord v. Southwell,*15 Wis. 211; *Perkins v. Davis,*16 Wis. 470; *Hoey v. Pierron,*67 Wis. 262, 268, 30 N. W. 692; *State v. Wertzel,*84 Wis. 344, 347, 54 N. W. 579; *Lauterbach v. Netzo,*111 Wis. 322, 87 N. W. 230; and other cases. The rule is thus stated in the headnote to *Perkins v. Davis, supra:*for the purpose of reviewing an erroneous taxation of costs “a bill of exceptions is necessary, showing what occurred before the court and taxing officer, the items objected to, and what decision was made thereon.”

*By the Court.*— The judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03089]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Centers for Medical Countermeasures 
Against Radiation Consortium (U19).
    Date: March 4, 2015.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Room 3F100, 5635 Fishers 
Lane, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Louis A. Rosenthal, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, DHHS/NIH/NIAID/DEA, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, MSC-7616, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-8399, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#770518041219031f161b1b1637191e161e1359191e1f59101801"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="95e7fae6f0fbe1fdf4f9f9f4d5fbfcf4fcf1bbfbfcfdbbf2fae3">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 9, 2015.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-03089 Filed 2-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 3 May 2006         

concerning draft national provisions notified by the Kingdom of the Netherlands under Article 95(5) of the EC Treaty laying down limits on the emissions of particulate matter by diesel powered vehicles

(notified under document number C(2006) 1791)

(Only the Dutch text is authentic)

(2006/372/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 95(5) and (6) thereof,

Whereas:

I.   FACTS

1.   Relevant Community legislation

2.   National provision notified

II.   PROCEDURE

III.   LEGAL ASSESSMENT

1.   Consideration of admissibility

2.   Assessment of merits

1.   Existence of new scientific evidence

2.   Problem specific to the Netherlands arising after the adoption of Directive 98/68/EC

3.   Assessment of the conditions under Article 95(6) of the EC Treaty

4.   International context

IV.   CONCLUSION

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The national provisions imposing a mandatory limit value for the emissions of particulate matter of 5 mg per kilometre on commercial vehicles with a maximum permissible weight of 1 305 kg (N1 vehicles, class I) and passenger cars (M1 vehicles) notified by the Kingdom of the Netherlands pursuant to Article 95(5) of the EC Treaty are rejected.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

Done at Brussels, 3 May 2006.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN            

Vice-President

----

(1)OJ L 350, 28.12.1998, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 42, 23.2.1970, p. 1.

(3)  COM(2005) 683 final.

(4)OJ L 163, 29.6.1999, p. 41.

(5)OJ L 296, 21.11.1996, p. 55.

(6)OJ C 12, 18.1.2006, p. 5.

(7)  TNO report, 06.OR.VM.013.1/IJR ‘Evaluation of the Dutch request for derogation to Directive 98/69/EC’, March 27, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the TNO report).

(8)              ‘Health aspects of Air Pollution with Particulate Matter, Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide’, Report on a WHO Working Group, 2003.

(9)  Meta-analysis of time-series studies and panel studies of Particulate matter (PM) and Ozone (O3), WHO Regional office for Europe, 2004.

(10)  See TNO report, p. 5.

(11)  See TNO report, p. 31.

(12)  See TNO report, p. 38.

(13)  See TNO report, p. 41.

(14)OJ L 346, 17.12.1997, p. 78.

(15)  UN/ECE Regulation 83 on ‘Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the emission of pollutants according to engine fuel requirements’.

----
Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Principle Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Carver Bancorp,
Inc., a Delaware corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
 c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: February 24, 2011
    
    /s/ Chris McFadden

Chris McFaddenChief Financial Officer