alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                   Exhibit 21

                                  CONVERSE INC.

                                  SUBSIDIARIES
                                  ------------

Converse Star I, Inc., a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in Massachusetts on March 26, 1985 (branch in England and Wales)

Converse EMEA Ltd., a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on January 29, 1990 (branch in England and Wales)

Converse France, Inc., a subsidiary of Converse Benelux Holding Company, Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on November 23, 1993 (branch in France)

Converse Europe, Inc., a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on November 23, 1993 (branch in the Netherlands)

Converse Benelux, Inc., a subsidiary of Converse Benelux Holding Company, Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on November 23, 1993 (branches in the Netherlands and 
Belgium)

Converse Benelux Holding Company, Inc., a subsidiary of Converse Europe, Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on November 23, 1993

Converse Germany, Inc., a subsidiary of Converse Europe, Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on March 21, 1994 (branch in Germany)

Converse Iberia, Inc., a subsidiary of Converse Europe, Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on July 8, 1994 (branches in Portugal and Spain)

Converse Italy, Inc., a subsidiary of Converse Europe, Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on September 21, 1994 (branch in Italy)

Converse Shelf, Inc., a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on November 21, 1994 (branch is no longer registered in
Japan as of 6/15/98)

Converse Scandinavia, Inc., a subsidiary of Converse Europe, Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on June 7, 1995 (branch in Denmark)

Converse Japan Corporation, a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on May 2, 1996 (branch in Japan)

Converse Mexico, Inc., a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on October 23, 1996 (branch in Mexico)

Converse All Star do Brasil Industria e Comercio Ltda., a subsidiary of Converse
Inc.
Incorporated in Brazil

Calzado Deportivo de Reynosa, S.A. de C.V., a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in Mexico on January 25, 1984

Converse Export Co. Limited, a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in Barbados on December 28, 1984 (a foreign sales corporation)

Apex One, Inc., a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in New Jersey on July 8, 1988
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of open Federal Advisory Committee meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The full committee meeting will focus on business opportunities for veterans and service disabled veterans. Several topics include government procurement and business development. The meeting is open to the public.

# DATES:

Wednesday, March 11, 2015 from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Washington, DC 20416, Eisenhower Conference Room C, located on the Concourse Level Floor.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), SBA announces the meeting of the Advisory Committee on Veterans Business Affairs. The Advisory Committee on Veterans Business Affairs serves as an independent source of advice and policy recommendation to the Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration. Advance notice of attendance or desire to make a presentation to the Advisory Committee is requested. Comments for the Record should be emailed to point of contact listed below prior to the meeting for inclusion in the public record. Verbal presentations will be limited to five minutes in order to meet the agenda objectives. Requests for attendance/briefing must be emailed or sent via post by March 4, 2015 to: Ms. Barbara Carson, Acting Associate Administrator, Office of Veterans Business Development, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Washington, DC 20416; phone: (202) 205-6773; email:                     *barbara.carson@sba.gov.*                     Public comments, requests for additional information and/or special accommodations should be directed to same contact above. For more information, please visit our Web site at                     *www.sba.gov/​vets.*

Dated: February 6, 2015.

Diana Doukas,  

SBA Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2015-03520 Filed 2-26-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA RCH 28, 2019

NO. 03

- 17

- 00704

- CV

Ericka Margaret Norman, Appellant

v.

Benjamin David Martin, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOOD WIN AND KELLY

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed b y the tr i a l court on July 18, 2017. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. The appellant

shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
# C_2005069EN.01000102.xml

| 19.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/1

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 13 January 2005

in Case C-126/04 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven): Heineken Brouwerijen BV v Hoofdproductschap Akkerbouw (1)

1

(Cereals - Import regime - Community tariff quota for barley for malting - Discrimination)

(2005/C 69/02)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case C-126/04: reference to the Court under Article 234 EC from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (Netherlands), made by decision of 18 February 2004, received at the Court on 8 March 2004, in the proceedings between Heineken Brouwerijen BV and Hoofdproductschap Akkerbouw – the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, E. Juhász and M. Ilešič, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 13 January 2005, in which it has ruled:

Heineken Brouwerijen BV

Hoofdproductschap Akkerbouw

Consideration of the questions raised has disclosed nothing capable of affecting the validity of Council Regulation (EC) No 1269/1999 of 14 June 1999 and Council Regulation No 822/2001 of 24 April 2001 opening a Community tariff quota for barley for malting falling within CN code 1003 00.

---

(1)  OJ C 106 of 30.04.2004.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

TIMOTHY JOHNSON,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 

PROBATION AND PAROLE,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 123 EM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of December, 2017, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1073/2006

of 13 July 2006         

fixing the export refunds on white and raw sugar exported without further processing

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the market in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Export refunds as provided for in Article 32 of Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 shall be granted on the products and for the amounts set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 14 July 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 July 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1.

----

ANNEX

REFUNDS ON WHITE SUGAR AND RAW SUGAR EXPORTED WITHOUT FURTHER PROCESSING APPLICABLE FROM 14 JULY 2006 (1)

----

(1)  The amounts set out in this Annex are not applicable with effect from 1 February 2005 pursuant to Council Decision 2005/45/EC of 22 December 2004 concerning the conclusion and the provisional application of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation amending the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 as regards the provisions applicable to processed agricultural products (OJ L 23, 26.1.2005, p. 17).

(1)  This amount is applicable to raw sugar with a yield of 92 %. Where the yield for exported raw sugar differs from 92 %, the refund amount applicable shall be calculated in accordance with Article 28(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001.

----
# C_2005045EN.01002102.xml

| 19.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/21

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 13 December 2004

In Case T-251/02, E v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Officials - Pay - Expatriation allowance - Daily subsistence allowance - Installation allowance - Reimbursement of travel expenses on taking up functions, and removal expenses - Place of recruitment - Articles 4, 5, 7, 9 and 10 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Language of the case: French - In Case T-251/02: E, residing in Brussels (Belgium), represented by G. Vandersanden and L. Levi, lawyers, against Commission of the European Communities (Agent: J. Currall, assisted by D. Waelbroeck, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg))

(2005/C 45/48)

Language of the case: French

application, first, for annulment of the Appointing Authority's decision of 29 August 2001 fixing the applicant's place of origin and of recruitment as Brussels and refusing to grant her the expatriation allowance, installation allowance, daily subsistence allowance, and travel and removal expenses relating to her taking up her functions and, secondly, payment of compensation and interest for late payment the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and N.J. Forwood, Judges; I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 13 December 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 247 of 12.10.2002.

1

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Boykin Lodging Company (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shereen P. Jones,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Shereen P. Jones
--------------------
Shereen P. Jones
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Investment Officer
March 15, 2006
UNMANNED AERIAL SOLUTIONS, INC. 

### Blue-Chip Unmanned Aerial Solutions, Inc. Attn: Clint P . Stevens 1965 South Beech St. Wichita, KS 67207 316- 305 - 5498 April 22, 2015 U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 

### Re: Request to amend and allow for Blue-Chip UAS, Inc. the ability to utilize additional sUAS platforms under the same direction as provided within exemption #11172, docket# FAA - 2014-0787-0009, approved February 10, 2015. Dear Sir/Madam, Dear Sir or Madam ; Blue-Chip Unmanned Aerial Solutions , Inc. (B lue-Chip UAS) was issued an exemption under Section 333 ofthe "FAA Modernization and Reform act of2012 " (the "Reform Act") numbered 11172 (the Exemption) for the purpose ofconducting UAS operations within the oil and gas, agriculture, wildlife and aerial photography industries. B lue-Chip UAS, herby requests an amendment to the Exemption to allow an additional type offuel "Fixed Wing " unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to be operated in full compliance with the conditions set forth within the Exemption. Blue-Chip UAS , requests permission to operate the following UAS based on their type , size, weight, and speed under the same terms and conditions contained within the Exemption and provided by the parameters set forth in regards to capabilities and limitations identified within the Flight Operations Manual and Maintenance Manual attached as provided.



### ---- --Model

**~** UA V Factory Penguin B/C Fixed Wing <11ft Span Weight <48lbs Speed < 80mph Blue-Chip UAS, respectfully requests the same finding from the FAA as provided to Aerial Mob, LLC as to their amended exemption numbered 11066A, docket lD FAA-2014-0353 , dated February 2, 2015. As indicated, the FAA found the amendment request was not precedent setting, that good cause exists for not publishing a summary ofthe petition in the Federal Register and that any delay in acting on the petition would be detrimental to the organization. Thank you for your time in regards to this petition and please direct any correspondence to Mr. Clint Stevens.

Clint P. Stevens Executive Director & Co-Founder Blue-Chip UAS, Inc. 316-305-5498

cc: Robert Pappas Kiera Jones John Barbagallo
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Special Emphasis Panel Clinical Trials SEP.                    

*Date:*                         March 5-6, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hotel Palomar, 2121 P Street NW., Washington, DC 20037.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Shanta Rajaram, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, NINDS/NIH/DHHS/Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Suite 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-435-6033,                         *rajarams@mail.nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: February 18, 2015.

Carolyn Baum, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-03638 Filed 2-23-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### Wagner, Respondent, vs. Levy, imp., Appellant.

For the appellant: *Joseph Eder,*attorney, and *John L. Newman*of counsel, both of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Julius 0. Roehl*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 25 August 2005         

declaring a concentration compatible with the common market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement

(Case COMP/M.3687 — Johnson & Johnson/Guidant)

(notified under document number C(2005) 3230)

(Only the English text is authentic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/430/EC)

On 25 August 2005 the Commission adopted a Decision in a merger case pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (1), and in particular Article 8(1) of that Regulation. A non-confidential version of the full Decision can be found in the authentic language of the case and in the working languages of the Commission on the website of the Directorate-General for Competition, at the following address: http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/index_en.html

I.   INTRODUCTION

A.   The Parties

B.   The operation

II.   THE RELEVANT MARKETS

A.   The relevant product markets

1.   Interventional cardiology devices

2.   Endovascular devices

3.   Cardiac surgery devices

B.   The relevant geographic markets

III.   COMPETITIVE ASSESSMENT

A.   Interventional cardiology

1.   Drug-eluting stents

2.   Steerable guidewires

3.   Conclusion

B.   Endovascular devices

C.   Cardiac surgery: endoscopic vessel harvesting systems

IV.   COMMITMENTS OFFERED BY THE PARTIES

V.   ASSESSMENT OF THE COMMITMENTS SUBMITTED

VI.   CONCLUSION

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

----
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1246 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to revise the definition of 

municipal solid waste for purposes of the renewable electricity production 

credit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2015 

Ms. STABENOW (for herself and Mr. BOOZMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to revise 

the definition of municipal solid waste for purposes of 

the renewable electricity production credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting America’s 

5 Paper for Recycling Act’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1246 IS

1 SEC. 2. REVISING DEFINITION OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE 

2 UNDER THE RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY PRO3 DUCTION CREDIT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (6) of section 45(c) of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

6 ‘‘does not include’’ and all that follows through the period 

7 and inserting the following: ‘‘does not include— 

8 ‘‘(A) paper which is commonly recycled 

9 and which has been segregated from other solid 

10 waste (as so defined), or 

11 ‘‘(B) solid waste (as so defined) which is 

12 collected as part of a system which includes ma13 terials recovery and which commingles com14 monly recycled paper with other solid waste 

15 which is not commonly recycled at any point 

16 from the time of collection through materials 

17 recovery.’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

20 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
          


                                                                      Exhibit 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-87806, 333-13269 and 333-62691) of Converse Inc.
of our report dated February 23, 1999, appearing in Converse Inc.'s January 2,
1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the application of such
report to the Financial Statement Schedule for the three years ended January 2,
1999 when such schedule is read in conjunction with the financial statements
referred to in our report. The audits referred to in such report also included
this Financial Statement Schedule.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 26, 1999