alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-1896

___________________________

Kenneth Lee Doss

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Iowa Department of Corrections; Gaile Hukins; Sean Crawford; Michelle

Gonzolaz; Pam Mullen

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines

____________

 Submitted: August 14, 2012

Filed: August 17, 2012

[UNPUBLISHED]

____________

Before BYE, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Iowa prisoner Kenneth Doss appeals the district court’s preservice dismissal

1

of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. After careful de novo review, see Cooper v.

The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern 1

District of Iowa.
Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam), we affirm for the reasons

provided by the district court, and deny Doss’s pending motions. See 8th Cir. R. 2

47B.

______________________________

We decline to address Doss’s arguments raised for the first time on appeal. 

2

See Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir. 2004).

-2-
NRO Seeks Nominations for Pioneer 

Honorees

March 8, 2000

The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) announced a program to recognize and honor the 

pioneers who made significant and lasting contributions to the discipline of national 

reconnaissance as part of its 40th Anniversary celebrations.

Mr. Keith Hall, NRO Director, will select 40 national reconnaissance pioneers based on 

recommendations from a special selection board. The pioneers will be recognized in a ceremony 

Sept. 27 at NRO headquarters where plaques will be permanently displayed in their honor. One 

or more individuals will be selected annually to be inducted into the pioneer program.

Anyone may nominate an individual to be a candidate for selection, but nominations are due to 

the NRO by April 14. Nominees may be living or deceased and may include anyone except 

former NRO directors, deputy directors and program managers as they have already been 

honored by the organization. Pioneers will be chosen based on the significance and lasting effect 

of their contributions to national reconnaissance.

Nominations must be no longer than one page, single-spaced and should identify the contribution 

for which the individual is being nominated. Nominations should be mailed to:

Director, National Reconnaissance Office

Attn: Secretariat, Pioneer Recognition Program

14675 Lee Road

WF1-13D31

Chantilly, VA 20151-1715
Exhibit 10.6

         The Lease Supplement No. 1 is incorporated by reference from the
Company's Form 10K filed with the Commission for the period ending December 31,
2000. The four additional Lease Supplements No. 1 are substantially identical in
all material respects to the filed Lease Supplement No. 1 except as follows:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aircraft (Tail No.)    Closing Date          Owner Participant

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N362ML*                October 19, 2000      Silvermine River Finance One, Inc.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N363ML                 November 29, 2000     Aircraft Services Corporation

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N364ML                 January 30, 2001      Aircraft Services Corporation

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N365ML                 March 19, 2001        Aircraft Services Corporation

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N366ML                 April 19, 2001        Castle Harbour-I Limited-Liability
                                             Company

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------
*   Filed document
From: Higgins, Cortney <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 7:29 PM

To: Shine, Brenda; Lassiter, Penny; Gillis, Thomas

Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Petroleum Refinery Sector Risk and Technology Review

and NSPS

Hi all,

Attached are the handouts from this meeting.

Regards, Cortney

-----Original Appointment-----
From: Echols, Mabel E. Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Petroleum Re finery Sector Risk and Technology Review and

NSPS When: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 3:00 PM-3:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). Where: Room 10103 New Executive Office Building

This meeting was requested by Stephanie Maddin, Earthjustice.

<< 2060AQ75_2014_04_22_PetRefRTR_Earthjustice_Handout1.pdf >> << 2060AQ75_2014_04_22_PetRefRTR_Earthjustice_Handout2.pdf >> << 2060AQ75_2014_04_22_PetRefRTR_Earthjustice_Handout3.pdf >>
8. 1 N 1

CO 4

II • • .

•

• 4 • • • ••n•••n • ••I

••••••• I A.** • :••• ••••

CON11401 NO

COPY 01 .COP11 f1

0 

*

PA1 1 01 1.,A61.ti

es*" lit i VIA

I El mffiliammi

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 29 August 1974

1. MEETING WITH DR. YARY/IDVICH

Dr. Mike Yarymovich, Chief Scientist of the Air Force,

visited me to inform me of a planned Air Force long range

planning study which has been requested by General Ellis,

Vice Chief of Staff. He will be sitting in on it as

Co-chairman of the Steering Group composed of representatives from several organizations. See the attachment.

They are planning to look at four major areas:

Application of space to Air Force missions.

Laser applications

Night and weather operations

Application of technology potentiality.

Mike suggested that the study would not be realistic

without major input from the NRO. I agreed in principle

to support the effort expressing some concern that it be

oriented towards potential applications and needs rather

than roles and missions. I also offered him a two hour

briefing on ameefalliffax Mr. as been informed and will make arrangements riefing some

time in Mid September.

2. TELEPHONE DISCUSSION MR. MR. BRUCE LOWE, USIB SECRETARIAT

Mr. Lowe called to confirm Lt Gen Daniel Graham requested that our Cyprus briefing be given to the full USIB.

He suggested that the first possible date would be Friday,

6 September; in the event that USIB does not meet on that

date, the alternative would be Thursday, 12 September.

I concurred and agreed to provide a 20 to 30 minute version of the Cyprus briefing. Mr. Plummer has been informed

and I suggested to him that he attend and possibly introduce the briefing.
C(NT OC )1 "40

COPY ()I COPII

PAvd L Oi PACIL .1 •

I. It

C I v S

3 . MEETING WITH ADMIRAL MOFFIT

I met with Admiral Moffit on this date; he desired to

continue the discussion he started with Mr. Plummer and

myself a few weeks ago concerning his desires to create an

all source information control center. He said he would

be interested in establishing some type of tracking of our

photographic satellite tasking and potentiality of the

SIGINT tasking in the future. We discussed some of the

difficulties involved - the lack of manpower and the desire

not to change current operations and flexibilities. He

will develop his plans further and contact me in a week

or two.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).

The comment period for these applications has been extended. Comments regarding these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 26, 2015.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Ivan Hurwitz, Vice President)  33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:

                    1.                     *CIT Group Inc., Livingston, New Jersey, and its subsidiary, Carbon Merger Sub LLC,*                     New York, New York; to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of, and to merge with, IMB Holdco LLC, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of OneWest Bank, N.A., both in Pasadena, California. In addition, Carbon Merger Sub LLC has applied to become a bank holding company.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Margaret McCloskey Shanks, 

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-02839 Filed 2-10-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Order entered December 21, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 00663 - CR No. 05 - 18 - 006 70 - CR JONATHAN TYRONE MCKE LLER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 380 - 81748 - 2017 & 380 - 80769 - 2017



### O RDER Appellant’s brief was initially due October 25, 2018. After we granted an extension, it was due November 30, 2018. To d ate, no brief has been filed and we have had no communication from appellant about the brief or the appeals. Therefore, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court sh all make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute these appeals or whether appellant has abandoned the appeals. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (percuriam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be

nece ssary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel

. We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the dat e of this order. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Benjamin Smith , Presiding Judge, 380th Judicial District Court ; Kristin Brown ; and to the Collin County District Attorney

. Th ese appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal s shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier

.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. AIRPORT TAXI SERVICE, INC. and Sea-Tac Taxi Service, Inc., Respondents.

No. 77-3479.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 27, 1978.

Rehearing Denied July 20, 1978.

Elliott Moore, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Eugene E. Sedille, Jr., Seattle, Wash., for respondents.

Before KILKENNY, TRASK and SNEED, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

TRASK, Circuit Judge.

The decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board in the above matter as reported at 230 NLRB 168 (July 22, 1977), is hereby enforced.
Exhibit 32B CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of AutoInfo, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) on the date hereof (the Report), I, William
Wunderlich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: (1)          The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request. Date:  November
5, 2008 /s/ William
 WunderlichWilliam
 WunderlichChief
 Financial Officer(Principal
 Financial Officer)
\\ 

TOP SEGRH ~ 

¢J NATIONAL RECONNAISSA!'~CE OFFICE 

BYEMAN 

WASHIN":;TON. D.C • 

..... E NRO STAFF 28 April 1971 

I. 

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. McLUCAS 

SUBJECT: Project TACTFUL 

Background 

The Navy was advised on 1 February 1971 (Attachment 1) that 

the NRO was conducting evaluations of NRO systems other than 

POppy for purposes of ocean surveillance. Admiral Harlfinger 

suggested that a good evaluation of STRAWMAN and TRIPOS/SOUSEA 

would be to utilize these systems during a major Soviet naval exercise (Attachment 2). In the interim, the U. S. Navy conducted a 

major fleet exercis e off the coast of San Diego; the NRO /SOC utilized 

this opportunity to conduct Proj ect TANGIBLE as an initial evaluation 

of the capabilities of STRAWMAN and TRIPOS/SOUSEA to provide 

timely data concerning shipborne emitters. 

Project TACTFUL 

\ 

The code name for NRO participation in the next maj 

naval exercise is TACTFUL. SORS approval has been ed to 

use STRAWMAN. TRIPOS/SOUSEA and POPPY from 23 Apri to 

31 August 1971 should the Soviet exercis e materialize. The p~rpose 

of the NRO participation is to provide processed STRAWMAN, 

TRIPOS/SOUSEA. and POppy data to the Navy as expeditiously as 

possible. Specific tip-off, collection, delivery and evaluation procedures are currently being established by the SOC in coordination with 

the Navy and the National Security Agency. 

An evaluation of the results of Project TANGIBLE and 

TACTFUL is expected to impact on the NRP in two areas. First, 

these proj ects should determi~e whether it is advisable to use 

STRAWMAN and TRIPOS/SOUSEA on a routine basis to provide ocean 

surveillance information. Secondly, an evaluation of the project 

results by SS-7 and the Director, Program C should assist in the 

development of the future NRP response to the ocean surveillance 

requirement. 

EARPOP 

BY HAHOlE VIA CONtROL ~" __ " In ......... t_e ..... r_n_a ... l __ COPT ___ or _lEt' TOP SECRET CONtROL5VSTEM EXCLUOED FROM ~UTOMAlle R£GRADING 

000 llInCTlV£ 5100"'0 Don tlOTAPPlY 

01' 2 j>jI,iIIl$ 

Approved for Release: 2017/08/17 COS099922, .... " __________ .......... _"_'')_' 
/ 

;' 

The Navy has a very strong interest in project TACTFUL 

and has made a formal request to you soliciting your assistance 

(Attachment 3). The Director, NSA, has notified the Navy of 

NSAls readiness to participate. 

The success of Project TACTFUL will require continuing 

close coordination between the Navy and the.NRO Staff for tipoff and evaluation. It is recomm3nded that you approve the 

proposed response to the Navy's request on the facing page. 

,"'" 

/ 1;<;1A"': ~(,..z...rl./ , c,.- I ,_ ~, 

DAVID D. BRADBURN 

Colonel, USAF 

Director 

4 Attachments 

1 .. DNRO memo to eNo, 1 Feb 71 

(BYE 12590-71) 

· 2. BYE-66482-70, dtd 5 Jan 71 

3. CNO memo dtd 20 Apr ·71 

4. Gayler memo 5 May 71 

I . 

TOP SECRET CONTROL ND ______ _ 

COPY Of ___ COPIU 

PAGE or ___ PAGES 

Approved for Release: 2017/08/17 COS099922
#### E. M. ADAMS v. R. E. & M. C. REEVES.

*Practice — Amendment of Record*-- *'Security for Costs..*

1. An amendment of a record of a Court must be made in the Court where.* the *record*was originally made. .

2. The exercise of the discretionary power of the Court below in regard: to security for costs is not subject to review in this Court.

*(Jones*v. *Cox,*1 Jones 373. cited and approved.)

Civil , ACTION, tried at a Special Term of the Superior-Court of G-uileórd County (held in December, 1876,) before *Kerr, J.*

The point decided in this Court involved the exercise of' discretionary- power by His Honor in refusing1 to allow the motion of defendants for additional security for the prosecution of the suit. The facts appear in the opinion. The defendants appealed from the ruling of the Court below.

*Messrs. Scott $ Caldwell,*for plaintiff.

*Messrs. Watson £ Glenn, Gray Stamps,*and *W. H. Bailey,.*for defendants.

*413Eaircloth, J.

At Spring Term, 1876, of Davidson Superior Court, this cause was removed to Guilford County for trial and at the same term the following order was made; ■“ Rule on the plaintiff to give additional security or j ustify the present on or before-of next term of Guil-ford Superior Court.” At Fall Term of the latter Court the plaintiff justified his present security and the rule was •discharged. It was at the same Term suggested by defendant that the order made at Davidson was one for additional security only, and that the Clerk of Davidson County had not entered the order on the docket correctly. TIis Honor held that he could not go behind the record. The rule was then “ continued by consent until the present Term,” when a motion was made on the original affidavit for additional' security, which motion was refused by the Court in the exercise of discretionary power, and the original rule was not called up or otherwise referred to. It nowhere appears that an appeal has been taken from anything except from an appeal bond of defendant dated Dec. 15th, 1876.

We will however consider the case before us, and we are ■of opinion that His Honor was right in refusing to go behind the record. An amendment of a judgment or order should be in the Court where the record itself was made originally. To allow it to be done in another County would be inconvenient and would make the record inconsistent with itself in the same action and between the same parties.

The motion next made for additional security was purely a discretionary matter and we are not authorized to review it. *Jones*v. *Cox,*1 Jones, 373.

There is no error. Let this be certified.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
National Reconnaissance Office to Build GeoLITE Satellite

10 July 1998

The National Reconnaissance Office has begun awarding contracts to design, build and operate a 

communications technology demonstration satellite. 

The satellite is the Geosynchronous Lightweight Technology Experiment (GeoLITE), which is 

an advanced technology demonstration satellite with a laser communications experiment and an 

operational UHF communications mission. The GeoLITE satellite will weigh approximately 

4,000 pounds and be launched on a Boeing Delta II launch vehicle.

TRW Inc. has total system integration responsibility for GeoLITE. Teammates include the 

Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Lincoln Laboratory, which will be responsible for the 

laser communications payload, and Hughes Space and Communications Company, which will be 

responsible for the UHF communications payload. 

GeoLITE is another example of the NRO engaging in cutting edge technology to assure the 

United States continues to be the world’s leader in satellite reconnaissance.
......... _---

WORKING PAPER, OESTROY 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEA'E OR CONTROL BY ~9 ( 

DECLASSIFIED BY: CIIART 

DECLASSIFIED ON: 25 JULY 2012 OPrICAL TECHNOLOGY DIVISION 

OPrO-MECHANICAL DESIGN ENGINEERING 

Memorandum ME 65 

, 

TO: Distribution 

L.B. Molaskey j 

DATE: October 12, 1971 

FROM: 

SUBJECT: Telecon with Lt. Cdr. Doyle 

I called Lt. Cdr. Doyle to inquire of the status of the underwater 

hook recovery test program being conducted off San Diego. He indicated that 

there was a problem of some sort with the hook which occurred during the operation of transferring the hook from the White Sands to the Trieste. Something 

either broke, came apart or was damaged. He had no details of the exact problem. However, the damage has been repaired and as far as he knows the hook is 

now operable. 

Recovery of the test shape is being delayed"because as yet the shape 

hasn't been located. The dive that occurred last Wednesday was unsuccessful 

due to a failure in the underwater navigation computer. In preparation for 

the third dive that anomaly has been corrected. However, they haven't been 

able to pin-point the location of the "test shape from the surface. 

Lt. Cdr. Doyle said that he expected they could complete the test 

program by Friday or Saturday at the latest. Adding 19 days for travel time 

to the site they should arrive on or about the 3rd or 4th of November. He 

suggested I delay my arrival in Hawaii to that time. 

He reported that the DeSteiguer has exp'erienced some probl ems in 

locating the test site. They apparently laid a network of transducers on the 

ocean floor from an initial survey. In rechecking their location it was con-" 

cluded that they were in the wrong place. However, a second check indicated 

they were probably in the right place. (no official word has ye~ been received.) 

The DeSteiguer is apparently still having trouble with their ~atellite navigation 

system. 

Lt. Cdr. Doyle suggested I keep in touch so that the logistics of my 

up-coming trip can be worked out smoothly. 

LBM/cj 

cc: M.F. Maguire 

H.W. Robertson 

R.W. Jones 

C. Karatzas 

L.B 

P. Petty 

R. Roylance