alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1463 

AN ACT 

To amend the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability 

Act of 2014 to modify the distance requirement for expanded availability of hospital care and medical services 

for veterans through the use of agreements with nonDepartment of Veterans Affairs entities. 
2 

†S 1463 ES

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Access to Community 

5 Care for Veterans Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF DISTANCE REQUIREMENT FOR 

7 EXPANDED AVAILABILITY OF HOSPITAL 

8 CARE AND MEDICAL SERVICES FOR VET9 ERANS THROUGH THE USE OF AGREEMENTS 

10 WITH NON-DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF11 FAIRS ENTITIES. 

12 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section 

13 101(b)(2) of the Veterans Access, Choice, and Account14 ability Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–146; 38 U.S.C. 1701 

15 note) is amended to read as follows: 

16 ‘‘(B) resides more than 40 miles (cal17 culated based on distance traveled) from a med18 ical facility of the Department, including a com19 munity-based outpatient clinic, that is the clos20 est such medical facility to the residence of the 

21 veteran that is able to provide to the veteran 

22 the hospital care or medical services that the 

23 veteran needs;’’. 

24 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

25 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date that is 60 days 
3 

†S 1463 ES

1 after the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply 

2 with respect to care and services provided under section 

3 101 of the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability 

4 Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–146; 38 U.S.C. 1701 note) 

5 on and after such effective date. 

6 (c) EMERGENCY DESIGNATIONS.— 

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) is designated as an emergency re9 quirement pursuant to section 4(g) of the Statutory 

10 Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (2 U.S.C. 933(g)). 

11 (2) DESIGNATION IN SENATE.—In the Senate, 

12 the amendment made by subsection (a) is designated 

13 as an emergency requirement pursuant to section 

14 403(a) of S. Con. Res. 13 (111th Congress), the 

15 concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 

16 2010. 

Passed the Senate May 22, 2015. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1463 

AN ACT 

To amend the Veterans Access, Choice, and AcVeterans Affairs entities. the use of agreements with non-Department of care and medical services for veterans through requirement for expanded availability of hospital countability Act of 2014 to modify the distance
\1RO APPROVED FOR 

:-.AELA8E 1 JULY 2015 

• 

IT 

Hadella BYEMAN 

Ceritrel System 

• 28 June_ 1967 

IZMORANDUM FOR RECORD 

SUB.re.C1: MOL Briefing to GAO 

On 23 June Major Cohen and:.T=gave,a short 'MOL Program briefing to 

!fr. Gilliam Nei men, _Director of C Tense Division, GAO. Also present ,Was 

Mr. Handley of DCA A,. The briefiertoas Primal:11Y oriented to an 

indoetrination of Mr. Newman inta:the "security aspeets of the NRO and its 

progroms.-, I'presented a brief- prititiewTof the MOL system, its mission.. 

and contractor structure.: kir. ;140441:n44ii-quite interestecl -._ in the mount 

of black work being done at each Cantitiator.: 1 believe we convinced him., 

that the GAO would have. difficulties.reviewing General Electric encl.:that 

would be quite icipodsible toz:reviewInc without "serious COMPFOlaiSe of 

security:- 

Mr. liandley1,0 :presence he'lpe 

problem. Neiman believes :4:0 

review: of black contractors' to. 

speak with..Mr. petty, Director!'0 

Mr. ,NewMan requested ,that Haroldand taYte, on the ,task -..of? 

review, to 

be possible to delegateT the 

Asa. thatrrespect he intends t.41, ' 

and,poesibly.Mr: Anthony. 

staff be cleared Dorian 

Handley the delegation of 

.4 

, e• 

- . 

.It seems that the strange; ik,,mativatioa for the GAO review 

is the question of duplication,A Willie and hardware between MASA and 

HOL. After having been apprised' i the 14,0/. mission, Mr. Newman realized 

there is no duplication in that depertment. -1 also assured him• that 

because I am a NASA employee au '4ChiltiCal. Director of MOL, .1 personall 

make sure there is no unnecessary __ ,upliCation In the technical ;area. 

This statement seemed to satisf :is 

Major .Cohen.will take "carelo 

Mr. Rubin,' an“-recaMmend 

Program:: This approach will - 

the -GAO. 

t uestion.of clearability'of 

=possible- he be cleared ,into the. 

arm uoue d,f ficulties with 

min r,YARYMOVYgn 

Technical:Director, 

01, Program 

r. Y-aryMOychiSAFSL/50961/2810 

Copies to SAFSLA - Official :111 -

SAFSL = Chron 

, • r• F‘ MI 41 SCG'- Read 

„. .
tu. tui

ToRiez osawerLes Ow Ir be

- Iapo Ey/ PPADS * MORES APB WD”

USAF FOR AD DoaT eeMEAL cimr INFO ARDC FOR RDRB. THIS
MESSAGE IN THREE PARTS. PART ONE CLH REFERENCE YOUR OPS
TUMED TATE MESSAGE DATED 23 ‘AUGUST séesc. ALTHOUGH ACTION IS
BEING ARRANGED To IMPLEMENT SAFUS DIRECT ION THROUGH SOURCE
SELECTION PROCEDURES CHM IT IS BELIEVED ‘THAT SAFUS MAY DESIRE

TO REVIEW THIS MATTER PRIOR To IMPLEMENTATION. PART TWO CLW IT Is
NECESSARY TO CLEARLY ESTABLISH CERTAIN FACTS CONCERNED IN THE
MATTER OF THIS DIRECTION. THIS DIRECTION MUST BE RECOGNIZED as
CHANGING THE THEME OF E~6 FROM A BACKUP RECOVERY PROGRAM TO BE
OBTAINED AT THE EARLIEST DATE TO ONE OF SOLVING RELATIVELY
COMPLEX CAMERA AND STABILIZATION PROBLEMS. THIS DIRECTION IS
BELIEVED TO BE A CHANGE OF MAJOR SCOPE DESPITE OPTIMISW IN SOME
QUARTERS. AND AMONG CERTAIN CONTRACTORS, THERE iS NO CONFIDENCE
THAT SUCH A DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CAN BE ACHIEVED IN THE. SAME TIME
PERIOD OR WITHIN THE SAME REFERENCE OF RELIABILITY “AS THE LOVER

: ee rineen tte mains bn hele or tn vari e seid witout eopronl of SAN OFVICR OF PaIMARY nerEnser.)
Page 1 of 2 - : : :

AFNQ cS 0-200 _ —+Stererl! ’ he 7

‘THIS POR WAY OF UEEC, : Crammer tt



‘THIS:TIME. CMM WITH THE AIR FORCE
BEING CHARGED WITH DIRECTING THE SPECIFICATIONS IN SUCH A MANNER
AS TO FAVOR SPECIFIC CONTRACTORS. PART THREE ‘CLN WE HAVE COMPLETED
CHANGES TO THE WORK STATEMENT AND ARE PREPARED TO RELEASE “HEM ~0
THE CONTRACTORS CLN HOWEVER CMM THEIR RELEASE IS BEING WITHHELD
UNTIL THE SAFUS HAS HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THE ABOVE
CAUTIONARY COMMENTS

BT

NOTE ; Advance copy delivered to OOP-cP

Page 2 of 2

d * COPY No.
AFHO JSS 0-208 SECRET
PREV:OUS EDITIONS OF

THs FOMG MAY BE USED
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 15, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136469 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136469 

 COA: 271597 

Wayne CC: 05-007927

TIMOTHY ROY NULL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 25, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s1008 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 15, 2008 

 Clerk
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 247 (Friday, December 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80354-80355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32910]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Nevada

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Nevada. The Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that 
public notice of this meeting be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Wednesday, January 18, 2012; 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Atomic Testing Museum, 755 E. Flamingo Road, Las Vegas, 
Nevada 89119.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denise Rupp, Board Administrator, 232 
Energy Way, M/S 505, North Las Vegas, Nevada 89030. Phone: (702) 657-
9088; Fax (702) 295-5300 or email: nssab@nv.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the 
Board is to make recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the 
areas of environmental restoration, waste management, and related 
activities.
    Tentative Agenda: Fiscal Year 2014 Environmental Management 
Activities Prioritization.
    Public Participation: The EM SSAB, Nevada, welcomes the attendance 
of the public at its advisory committee meetings and will make every 
effort to accommodate persons with physical disabilities or special 
needs. If you require special accommodations due to a disability, 
please contact Denise Rupp at least seven days in advance of the 
meeting at the phone number listed above. Written statements may be 
filed with the Board either before or after the meeting. Individuals 
who wish to make oral presentations pertaining to agenda items should 
contact Denise Rupp at the telephone number listed above. The request 
must be received five days prior to the meeting and reasonable 
provision will be made to include the presentation in the agenda. The 
Deputy Designated Federal Officer is empowered to conduct the meeting 
in a fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of business. 
Individuals wishing to make

[[Page 80355]]

public comments will be provided a maximum of five minutes to present 
their comments.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing to Denise Rupp at the 
address listed above or at the following Web site: http://nv.energy.gov/nssab/MeetingMinutes.aspx.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on December 19, 2011.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-32910 Filed 12-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 9039]

                    The Government of the Republic of Italy has informed the Government of the United States of America of its interest in an extension of the                     *Memorandum of Understanding Between the Government of United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Italy Concerning the Imposition of Import Restrictions on Categories of Archaeological Material Representing the Pre-Classical, Classical, and Imperial Roman Periods of Italy*                     (“MOU”).                

Pursuant to the authority vested in the Assistant Secretary of State for Educational and Cultural Affairs, and pursuant to the requirement under 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(1), an extension of this MOU is hereby proposed.

Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(2), the views and recommendations of the Cultural Property Advisory Committee regarding this proposal will be requested.

                    A copy of the MOU, the Designated List of restricted categories of material, and related information can be found at the following Web site:                     *http://culturalheritage.state.gov.*

Dated: February 9, 2015.

Evan Ryan,

Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2015-03311 Filed 2-17-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
JOSE LEAL

,

Petitioner,

v.

DIVISION OF

A DMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS,

OFFICE OF THE J UDGE OF

C OMPENSATION CLAIMS

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 0 996

Opinion filed May 5, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

.

Jose Leal, Pro se

, Petitioner.

Stephanie R. Hayes of Office of the Judge of Compensation Claims, Tallahassee

, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.

B.L. THOMAS, RAY

, and KELSEY

, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 21.1 List of Subsidiaries.

           Subsidiary                              Jurisdiction of Formation
           ----------                              -------------------------
Auldana Beach Pty Limited                                   Australia
Australia Entertainment Pty Limited                         Australia
Carryton Pty Limited                                        Australia
Communications & Entertainment Australia Pty Limited        NSW
Communications & Entertainment Services Pty Limited         SA
Communications & Entertainment Retail Pty Limited           SA
CTV Pty Limited                                             Australia
Dovevale Pty Limited                                        Australia
Grovern Pty Limited                                         Australia
Jacolyn Pty Limited                                         Australia
Keansburg Pty Limited                                       Australia
Kidillia Pty Limited                                        Australia
Lystervale Pty Limited                                      Australia
Maxi-Vu Pty Limited                                         Australia
Minorite Pty Limited                                        Australia
Orloff Pty Limited                                          Australia
Palara Vale Pty Limited                                     Australia
Saturn Communications Limited                               New Zealand
Selectra Pty Limited                                        Australia
Societe Francaise des Communications et du Cable S.A.       France
STV Pty Limited                                             Australia
Telefenua, S.A.                                             French Polynesia
UIH AML, Inc.                                               Colorado
UIH Austar, Inc.                                            Colorado
UIH Australia Holdings, Inc.                                Colorado
UIH Australia Programming II, Inc.                          Colorado
UIH-SFCC, L.P.                                              Colorado
UIH-SFCC Holdings, L.P.                                     Colorado
UIH-SFCC II, Inc.                                           Colorado
United Wireless, Inc.                                       Colorado
United Wireless Pty Limited                                 Australia
Vermint Grove Pty Limited                                   Australia
Vinatech Pty Limited                                        Australia
Windytide Pty Limited                                       Australia
Xtek Bay Pty Limited                                        Australia
Yanover Pty Limited                                         Australia
NRO APPROVED FOR RI!LEASE 

DECLASSIFIED BY: C/IART 

DECLASSIFIED ON: 9 JULY 2012 

SESRET 

COMMENTS OF LOUIS MAZZA AT ZZ OCTOBER 1964 

QUILL MEETING IN THE SPECIAL SECURITY CENTER 

I have explored with appropriate personnel of the-f&+. NRO, 

the matter of security classification and control to be applicable 

to the products of Project QUILL. I find the following facts 

to be germaine to consideration of this matter: 

(1) Project QUILL is essentially a feasibility 

demonstration relating to the use of radar as a satellite 

intelligence collection system. 

(Z) The program is of a highly experimental nature 

and the three presently available payloads are not adaptable 

to operational employment. There is no plan to scan 

other than U. S. territory. 

(3) Whereas it is envisioned that representatives 

of the exploitation community will subsequently be asked 

to assist in the evaluation of the results of this demonstration, maximum effort is being focused at this time on 

the task of recovering and reconstituting a satellite radar 

product and evaluating from an engineering standpoint. 

Following this, intelligence utilization evaluation will 

be considered. 

(4) The acceptable limitation of operation from 

the national policy standpoint has not as yet been defined 

(radar after all is a non-passive collection system) and 

these parameters when developed could have a direct 

bearing upon the matter under consideration. 

For these reasons I feel it is premature to consider the matter of 

security classification and controls at this time, and I have concurred 

with recommendation of the-+i+-NRO Program Directorate A to retain 

the results of this demonstration under Project QUILL controls until 

such time as circumstances indicate that other action is appropriate. 

BESREl
Download
 Details
 Share
 Press Release
 NROL-70 Launches on Final Delta IV Heavy Rocket
 SEE THE PRESS RELEASE
 SHARE
 PRINT
 National Reconnaissance Office

Launch your Career Do Business With Us search Menu

Home
 About
 Careers
 Launches
 Work With Us
 News & Media
 Resourcesfacebook
 twitter
 youtube
 instagram
 linkedinContact Us NRO SealNational Reconnaissance Office

facebook
 twitter
 youtube
 instagram
 linkedinContact Us

Who We Are

Mission Partners & Customers
 Our Leadership
 A Declassified History

Careers

Working at the NRO
 Career Fields
 Job Listings
 Student Opportunities

Launches

Missions
 Launch Vehicles

Do Business With Us

How To Do Business With Us
 Director's Innovation Initiative
 Acquisition Research Center

News & Media

Featured Stories
 Press Releases
 Podcasts
 Speeches and Testimony

Resources

NRO Multimedia
 Request a Speaker



USA FlagAn official website of the United States government. Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil

Policy

Site Policies
 Privacy
 No FEAR Act
 Inspector General
 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
 Accessibility
March 5, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE MATTER OF J.F ., JR. , a Juvenile

NO. 14

- 12

- 00777

- CV

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on August 21, 2012. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant , J.F., Jr. We f urther order this decision certified below for observance.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6508

SYLVESTER ANTERRIO BOONE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN BENARD MACKIE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. 

(0:15-cv-01503-MGL)

Submitted: September 13, 2016 Decided: September 15, 2016

Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sylvester Anterrio Boone, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John 

Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Sylvester Anterrio Boone seeks to appeal the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Boone has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### James, Respondent, vs. Holtz and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Whaley & Paulsen*of Racine.

For the respondent: *'Thorson & Seymour*and *Thomas R. Amlie,*all of Elkhorn.

*By the Court,*

Judgment affirmed.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 2- 18 96

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Ken ne th Lee Dos s ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt
v. Io wa Dep art m en t o f Co rrec ti on s; Gail e Huk in s; Sean Crawfo rd ; M ic he ll e Gon zo la z; Pam

Mu ll en ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e So uthe rnDis tri ctof I owa- Des M oi ne s

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Aug us t 1 4, 2 01 2 Fi le d: Aug us t 1 7, 2 01 2 [UNPUBLISHED]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re BYE, GRUENDER, andBENTON, Circu itJu dg es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM. Io wa pr is on er Ken ne th Dos s ap pe al s th e di st ric t co urt’s pr es erv ic e di sm is sa l 1 of hi s 42 U.S.C. § 19 83 co m pl ai nt
. Afte r care fu l de no vo rev ie w, se e Co o pe r v. The Hon or ab le Jo hn A. Ja rv ey , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e So ut he rn 1 Dis tri ctof I owa .Sc h r i r o , 18 9 F.3 d 78 1, 78 3 (8 th Ci r. 19 99 ) (p er cu ria m ), we affi rm fo r th e reas o n s

pr ov i d e d b y th e di st ric t co urt, an d de ny Dos s’s pe nd in g m ot io ns . Se e 8t h Ci r. R. 2 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

W e de cl in e to ad dr es s Dos s’s arg um en ts r a i s e d fo r th e fir st ti m e on ap pe al
. 2 Se e Sto ne v. Har ry , 36 4 F .3d91 2, 9 14 (8t h C ir. 2 00 4)
. -2
-