alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1461 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1461

    To provide for the extension of the enforcement instruction on 
    supervision requirements for outpatient therapeutic services in 
        critical access and small rural hospitals through 2015.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2015

   Mr. Thune (for himself, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Moran, and Mr. Tester) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide for the extension of the enforcement instruction on 
    supervision requirements for outpatient therapeutic services in 
        critical access and small rural hospitals through 2015.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ENFORCEMENT INSTRUCTION ON SUPERVISION 
              REQUIREMENTS FOR OUTPATIENT THERAPEUTIC SERVICES IN 
              CRITICAL ACCESS AND SMALL RURAL HOSPITALS THROUGH 2015.

    Section 1 of Public Law 113-198 is amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by striking ``2014'' and 
        inserting ``2015''; and
            (2) by striking ``calendar year 2014'' and inserting 
        ``calendar year 2015''.
                                 <all>
```
2014 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

10-20-2014

USA v. Dung Bui

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 11-3795

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2014

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2014 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Dung Bui" (2014). 2014 Decisions. Paper 1096.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2014/1096
PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 11-3795

_____________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

DUNG BUI a/k/a DANNY BUI

 Dung Bui, Appellant 

______________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN 

DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

(D.C. Crim. Action No. 5-08-cr-00427-002)

District Judge: Honorable Legrome D. Davis

______________

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

June 26, 2014

______________

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

It appears that the full text of footnote number 1 did not appear in the version of the 

opinion filed earlier today. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that an amended opinion is 

hereby filed.

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Date: October 20, 2014
.. ,, 

UNCLASSIFIED 

FROM 1 USC D tCEUJt 

TO s DDRIMSA · 

DM. s 27161flz AUQ 5' 

REF 

. 

Ml Nh 12729 · 

ACTNa $/ASST 1 

(FRIEDM\N) 

.IW01 115 2 

1:c.: ·3..°"3"i5fl• PASS TO Ga W ~ FR I ECM\N. REFERENCE YOUR t«SIME 

\ 

TO REAR Am41 RAL J N WEMl!Ro NMEUI FORWARD I Na COPY DOCIHNT 

REQUESTED 

W~/JF' 

UNCLASStFIED 

COl"'t..J__CE 2 COPIES 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 08-23-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1281 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a standard home 

office deduction. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 11, 2015 

Mr. UDALL (for himself and Mr. BOOZMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

a standard home office deduction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Helping Our Middle5 Class Entrepreneurs Act’’ or the ‘‘HOME Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STANDARD DEDUCTION FOR BUSINESS USE OF 

7 HOME. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 280A of 

9 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding 

10 at the end the following new paragraph: 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1281 IS

1 ‘‘(7) STANDARD HOME OFFICE DEDUCTION.— 

2 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an indi3 vidual who is allowed a deduction for the use of 

4 a home office because of a use described in 

5 paragraph (1), (2), or (4), notwithstanding the 

6 limitations of paragraph (5), if such individual 

7 elects the application of this paragraph for the 

8 taxable year, such individual shall be allowed a 

9 deduction equal to the standard home office de10 duction for the taxable year in lieu of the de11 ductions otherwise allowable under this chapter 

12 for such taxable year by reason of such use. 

13 ‘‘(B) STANDARD HOME OFFICE DEDUC14 TION.—For purposes of this paragraph, the 

15 standard home office deduction is the lesser 

16 of— 

17 ‘‘(i) $1,500, or 

18 ‘‘(ii) the gross income derived from 

19 the individual’s trade or business for which 

20 such use occurs. 

21 ‘‘(C) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—In the 

22 case of any taxable year beginning in a calendar 

23 year after 2015, the dollar amount in subpara24 graph (B)(i) shall be increased by an amount 

25 equal to— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1281 IS

1 ‘‘(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

2 ‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de3 termined under section 1(f)(3) for the cal4 endar year in which the taxable year be5 gins, determined by substituting ‘2014’ for 

6 ‘1992’ in subparagraph (B) thereof. 

7 Any increase determined under the preceding 

8 sentence shall be rounded to the nearest mul9 tiple of $100.’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

12 December 31, 2014. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S

N O S . A P - 7 6 , 6 4 2 , A P - 7 6 , 6 4 3 & A P - 7 6 , 6 4 4

E X P A R T E J A M E S G U Y G A R N E R , A p p l i c a n t

O N A P P L I C A T I O N S F O R W R I T S O F H A B E A S C O R P U S C A U S E N O . 1 7 2 7 3 I N T H E 3 2 9 T H D I S T R I C T C O U R T

F R O M W H A R T O N C O U N T Y

P e r c u r i a m . O P I N I O N P u rsuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Proced u re , t h e cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court these application s fo r wr i ts of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of one count of continuous violence ag ainst the family and two counts of abandoni n g a ch i l d wi thout intent to return. H e wa s sentence d to eight y ear s’ imprisonment on eac h count. Applicant contends that he was deprive d of his rig ht to appea l his conv i ct i o n s t hroug h no fault of his own. It i s ap p ar en t from the fac e of the rec ord that, though appellate counsel was appointed in2

timely fashion, he was not notified of that appointment until well afte r notice of appea l could be filed. We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appea l of the judgme nts of conviction i n C au s e No

. 17273 from the 329 J udicial District Court of Wharton t h County

. Ex parte Riley , 193 S.W .3d 900, 902 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Applicant is order ed returne d
to that time at which he may g i v e a wr i t t en n o t ice of appea l so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaning ful appea l. Wit hin ten day s of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall deter

mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court s h al l i m m ed iately appoint an attorney to repr esent Applicant on direc t appea l. All time limit s shall be calc ulated as if the sentenc e had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appe al, he
must take aff

irmative steps to file a written notice of appea l in the trial court within 30 day s afte r the mandate of

this Court i ssues.

Deliver ed: September

21, 2011 Do Not Publish
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Somerset International Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the six months ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John X. Adiletta,  Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| (1) | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| (2) | The information contained  such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 
| Dated: August 12, 2005 |
|------------------------|

 

 **Somerset International Group, Inc.**

 
| By: | /s/ John X. Adiletta |
|-----|----------------------|

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer
DE P H ome A bout DE P P rograms C ontac t Site M ap Searc h

Programs Water Home Assessment Beaches Drinking Water Everglades Restoration Grants & Loans Ground Water Mining & Minerals Monitoring Restoration Springs Standards & Assessment Stormwater TMDLs Underground Injection Wastewater Water Policy Watersheds Wetlands

Information Forms & Applications Rules Permits Contacts Data Ecosystem Projects Program Coordination and Regulation Highlights



## Lake Okeechobee Phosphorus Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)

In 1999, the Department initiated the development of a phosphorus TMDL for Lake Okeechobee. This TMDL, adopted by rule in May 2001, proposes an annual load of 140 metric tons of phosphorus to Lake Okeechobee to achieve an in-lake target phosphorus concentration of 40 ppb in the pelagic zone of the lake. This restoration target will support a healthy lake system, restore the designated uses of Lake Okeechobee and allow the lake to meet applicable water quality standards. The annual load was calculated using computer models developed with guidance from the Lake Okeechobee TMDL Technical Advisory Committee. The entire load is allocated to the sum of all nonpoint sources. Currently, there are no point sources discharging directly to Lake Okeechobee. If new information is available, the TMDL can undergo a re-evaluation within 5 years of its adoption. The implementation of the TMDL will follow a phased management approach consistent with the Lake Okeechobee Protection Act, Section 373.4595, Florida Statutes , to achieve the water quality goal by 2015.

Lake Okeechobee TMDL August 2001 (1.46 MB) Appendix One (126K) Appendix Two (536K) Appendix Three (139K) Appendix Four (231K) Appendix Five (187K) Lake Okeechobee Phosphorus TMDL Rule Links Related to Topic

Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) Development of TMDLs in the Northern Tributaries to Lake Okeechobee

For more information please contact Frank Nearhoof of the Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration at 850-245-8420.

Office of Ecosystem Projects Program Coordination and Regulation Program 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, MS

- 24 Program Coordination and Regulation Home Roles and Responsibilities Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan ( CERP ) Everglades Forever Act ( EFA ) Northern Everglades and Estuaries Protection Program ( NEEPP ) Lake Okeechobee Permitting Everglades Permitting Permit Forms Publications Related LinksPublications Public Notices Navigation Sitemap

Documents are Adobe Acrobat files, which will open in a new window, unless indicated, and require the free Reader Software. Tallahassee, FL 32399

- 3000 850

- 245

- 8346
Last updated: September 21, 2011

Copyright 2011 State of Florida Disclaimer Exit Disclaimer Privacy Statement 2600 Blair Stone Road M.S. 3500 Tallahassee, Florida 32399 850

- 245

- 8336 (phone) / 850

- 245

- 8356 (fax)

DEP Home | About DEP | Contact Us | Search | Site Map
OSWER/OSRTI 

Washington, DC 20460

 NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL) 

***Final Site*** December 2013

GARDEN CITY GROUND WATER 

PLUME

Garden City, Indiana

Bartholomew County

 Site Location:

The Garden City Ground Water Plume is located in the unincorporated town of Garden City in Bartholomew County, 

Indiana, approximately one mile south of the city of Columbus. Garden City is in the flood plain of the east fork of the 

White River. The Garden City Ground Water Plume has affected residential and commercial drinking water wells and 

covers approximately 3.4 acres.

 Site History:

Since 1990, drinking water wells in Garden City have had intermittent trichloroethene (TCE) contamination, which 

has sometimes exceeded drinking water standards. Despite several investigations in the area, the origin of the TCE is 

unknown. 

 Site Contamination/Contaminants:

The ground water plume consists of TCE.

 Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment:

The town includes approximately 50 individual residences and a mobile home park. Garden City residential wells 

obtain drinking water from one common aquifer. All the residences, mobile homes and businesses in Garden City that 

are served by private ground water wells may be affected by the TCE plume. 

 Response Activities (to date):

The Indiana Department of Environmental Management supplies and maintains carbon filtration systems on three 

residential wells. Attempts to establish a water line main system in Garden City have not been financially feasible. 

 Need for NPL Listing:

The state of Indiana referred the site to the EPA because the site requires a long-term response and action and listing 

will allow for a proper and timely investigation of the nature and extent of contamination. Other federal and state 

cleanup programs were evaluated, but are not viable at this time. The EPA received a letter of support for placing the 

site on the NPL from the state of Indiana. 

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may 

change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56 FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent 

FR notices.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to 

these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on 

the Internet at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/index.asp or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.
HILLSBOROUGH,

APRIL TERM, 1797.

#### Kennedy & Co. *v.*Fairman.

Proof of the clerk’s hiintl-vmcmg, in entries made on the PVmtiiF’s books,, shad not be admitted while the clerk is living, although' he may be absent from the country.

Assumpsit, for goods, wares and merchandize, sold and delivered, &r. and upon the general issue phaded, the cause now came on to he tried. The PC it: tiff ottered a deposition taken in Maryland, which proved tin* entries in the Plaintiff*s hocks, to be in the hand-writing of a person who was a clerk of the Plaintiff’s at the time when the entries were made, and who at the time of the dcoosition taken was on a voyage to the West-Indies. — . Davie. for the Defendant, ohjrmed to ibis evidence, end ci'.rti *Go-wper*v. *Marsden.Esp Sep.*2. He urgid the danger of such evido.-ce, forii'ii L receivable, a man may get his clerk to make vvliat entries he pleases, and to what *528*.*, , amount also he pleases, and then set out on a voyage to the East or West-indies, and the entries wili enable the principal to recover the monies contained in them, by proving the hand• wriling of theclerk. Williams. *e contra.*Such evidence has been admitted in our courts. It was admitted in a case at Fayetteville, where the Plaintiff’s clerk had gone to some of the Northern States.

Haywood, Judge.

it has been admirted, I believe, in the case cited by *Mr. Williams ;*that case was cited and staled by some of the bar at Fayetteville, in the course of their argument, some time after it took place. I was informed of the decision soon after it .took place, but for my own part, l was always opposed to the principle of it, and took the earliest opportunity at the next term after it happened, and at Fayetteville, where the decision was given, to give it iny disapprobation. There a case came before (he court, where the clerk had gone to Georgia, and it was offered to substantiate the account by proof of his clerkship to the Plaintiff, and that the entries were in his hand-writing. This evidence was rejected by myself, and Judge Whiiams seemed to concur that the evidence was not proper. I am of opinion most clearly, the evidence now offered is improper, and ought not be received for the reasons offered by the Defendant’s counsel. The admission of such testimony would be immediately followed by a long train of frauds, as the committing of them would be rendered so easy and inviting by it.

Judge Stone.

I am of thesameopiuion. We should take care not to open a door to the practice of frauds.— The receiving of such testimony is certainly liable to the inconveniences mentioned by the Defendant’s counsel.— The evidence was rejected.
NROL-30 launch update

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release #2-07

CONTACT: (703) 808-5050 Jun. 18, 2007

A National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) payload (NROL-30) was successfully launched 

aboard a United Launch Alliance (ULA) Atlas V Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) 

from Space Launch Complex 41, Cape Canaveral, Florida, on June 15, 2007, at 11:12 a.m. EDT. 

This is the first Atlas V launch of an NRO payload.

Space vehicle separation was nominal and the NRO is confident in the performance of its 

mission. Atlas booster performance was nominal. The Centaur upper stage had a technical 

anomaly which resulted in minor performance degradation. The Space and Missile Systems 

Center has initiated a standard review process.
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V E N T H C IR C U IT DEC 19, 2007 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [ DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 07- 1147 9 Non-A rgum ent Calendar

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D. C. Docket N o. 06-04820 -CV -JFG -E BK CY
. N o. 05- 4444 2- JJR -1 3 IN RE: PHI LLIP A. TAL LEY, D e b t o r .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ PHILLIP A. TALLE Y , Pl ai nti ff -Appe llant , ve rs us CITY OF MOODY, AL , De fendant-Appellee
.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ Appeal f rom the United State s District Court for the NorthernDistrict of Alabam a

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ (D ec em be r 19, 200 7) Be fo re BL A CK , CA RN E S a nd BA RKE T T , Ci rc uit Jud ge s. PE R CU RIA M:2

Ph ill ip A
. T al le y

appe al s th e dis tr ic t c ourt’ s gr an t of sum m ar y j udgm en t i n fav orof t he Cit y

of M oo dy, A laba m a, in a ba nk rupt cy ad ve rs ary pr oc eed in g. T al le y a lle ge s th e Ci ty

vio la te d hi s bankr

upt cy stay by f or ci ng h im

to pay atr af fi c fi ne a ft er his bankr upt cy pe tit ionw as f

ile d. T he bankr

upt cy c ourt c onc lud ed

the traff ic fine w as a continuation of crim inal proceedings perm itted by 11 U. S. C. § 36 2( b) (1 ). T he dis tr ic t c ourt a ff irm ed
. A ft er

r ev ie wof

the r ec or d and the parties’ briefs, we aff

irm for the r easons stated in th e district court’ s well- reasoned opi nio n of

F eb ru ar y 28, 200 7. AFFIRMED.
NRO SELECTS 2009 CLASS OF 

PIONEERS

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE November 13, 2009 Release #02-09

CONTACT: (703) 808-5050

General Bruce Carlson USAF (Ret.), Director of the National Reconnaissance Office, selected 

Dr. James P. Campbell (deceased), Mr. Lacy G. Cook, and Mr. Michael F. Maguire as 2009 

Pioneers of National Reconnaissance. The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) Pioneer 

Program honors those individuals who have made significant and lasting contributions to the 

discipline of national reconnaissance. At a ceremony held November 12, at NRO headquarters in 

Chantilly, Virginia, General Carlson inducted Dr. Campbell (posthumously), Mr. Cook, and Mr. 

Maguire into the NRO’s Pioneer Hall. LTG John F. Kimmons, USA, Director, Intelligence Staff, 

Office of the Director of National Intelligence, was the guest speaker at this year’s event. 

Dr. James P. Campbell pioneered early conceptual studies and analysis, which resulted in a new, 

innovative, operational imaging reconnaissance capability. He provided technical excellence and 

leadership to ensure the successful development, test, launch, and deployment of the highly 

reliable spacecraft and ground processing system. He provided key technical improvements that 

have extended the operational lifespan of spacecraft to lengths unprecedented in space-based 

national reconnaissance.

Mr. Lacy G. Cook pioneered the development and application of unique technology to add new 

capability to an existing NRO satellite. Mr. Cook’s novel design allowed the new capability to fit 

within the vehicle's limited space. His innovative approach provided national policymakers with 

unprecedented capability and solved highly complex technical challenges. 

Mr. Michael F. Maguire pioneered one of the last film-based reconnaissance systems used by the 

NRO. Pushing the state-of-the-art during design and development phases of acquisition, Mr. 

Maguire’s efforts and leadership resulted in an invaluable national asset in reconnaissance and 

one relied on heavily by the nation’s decision-makers. The resulting imaging satellites brought 

reliability and operational longevity to new heights. 

The work of NRO pioneers set the stage for future NRO advancements. Thanks to Pioneer 

successes, today’s NRO provides actionable intelligence to users. With the addition of these 

three honorees, a total of 77 pioneers have been selected over the past 10 years. Designation as a 

Pioneer of national reconnaissance is the highest honor the NRO can bestow. Commemorative 

plaques for each Pioneer are on permanent display in Pioneer Hall at NRO Headquarters. 

-- NRO --