alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research (#1203); Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC), University of Michigan Site Visit.                    

*Dates & Times:*

June 3, 2015; 7:15 p.m.-9:00 p.m.

June 4, 2015; 7:15 a.m.-8:30 p.m.

June 5, 2015; 7:15 a.m.-4:00 p.m.

*Place:*                         University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Part open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Daniele Finotello, Program Director, Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers Program, Division of Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-4676.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning further support of the MRSEC at the University of Michigan.                    

## Agenda

### Wednesday, June 3, 2015

7:15 p.m.-9:00 p.m. Closed—Briefing of panel

### Thursday, June 4, 2015

7:15 a.m.-4:30 p.m. Open—Review of the MRSEC

5:00 p.m.-6:45 p.m. Closed—Executive Session

6:45 p.m.-8:30 p.m. Open—Dinner

### Friday, June 5, 2015

7:15 a.m.-9:50 a.m. Closed—Executive Session

9:50 a.m.-4:00 p.m. Closed—Executive Session, Draft and Review Report

*Reason for Closing:*                         The work being reviewed may include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the MRSEC. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: February 11, 2015.

Suzanne Plimpton,

Acting Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-03172 Filed 2-13-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1074

CALVIN L. SMITH,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

KEN CUCCINELLI, Attorney General for Commonwealth of 

Virginia, in his official capacity,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, 

Chief District Judge. (4:11-cv-00167-RBS-FBS)

Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 5, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin L. Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Calvin L. Smith appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) 

(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Smith v. Cuccinelli, No. 4:11-cv-00167-RBS-FBS 

(E.D. Va. Dec. 30, 2011). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2005143EN.01002901.xml

| 11.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/29

---

Removal from the register of Case C-273/02 (1)

1

(2005/C 143/46)

(Language of the case: French)

(Language of the case: French)

By order of 16 December 2004, the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-273/02: European Parliament v Council of the European Union, supported by Ireland, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

---

(1)  OJ C 219 of 14.09.2002.

1

---
NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

14675 Lee Road

Chantilly, VA 20151-1715

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release #11-12

Contact: (703) 808-5050 Sept. 13, 2012

 NRO 2012 Launch Campaign Completed with Successful Atlas V 

Rocket Launch

A National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) payload was successfully launched aboard a 

United Launch Alliance (ULA) Atlas V rocket from Space Launch Complex-3, 

Vandenberg Air Force Base (VAFB), California, at 2:39 p.m. PST, on September 13, 

2012. This is the fourth of four NRO launches for 2012. 

“I am extremely proud of our dedicated, hardworking government and contractor team! 

Today’s launch is the culmination of years of hard work,” said Col James D. Fisher, NRO 

Office of Space Launch Director. 

Today’s launch was dedicated to Dr. Pedro “Pete” Rustan. Throughout his career of 

dedicated government service, Dr. Rustan pioneered advances in national reconnaissance,

both on the ground and in space, by successfully designing, prototyping, and rapidly 

fielding advanced intelligence collection and processing systems. This launch honors his 

legacy of innovation, leadership, and patriotism. 

Today’s mission includes, for the first time for the NRO and for an Atlas V launch 

vehicle, an auxiliary payload which took advantage of rideshare possibility afforded by 

available volume and structural capacity of the launch vehicle. 

“The auxiliary payload effort highlights strong, beneficial partnering among the NRO, 

ULA, the Naval Postgraduate School, NASA, and the scientific community,” Ms. Betty 

Sapp, Director of the NRO, said. 

The NRO and ULA partnered to develop an Aft Bulkhead Carrier (ABC), which is a 

platform for accommodating auxiliary payloads on the Centaur second stage. Affixed to 

the ABC was an auxiliary payload called Operational Unique Technologies Satellite

(OUTSat), which carried 11 CubeSats. 

“We have long recognized that there are benefits and efficiencies to be gained through 

rideshare in space launch,” said Ms. Betty Sapp, Director NRO. “These benefits include 

opportunities to conduct scientific research, and demonstrate and apply emerging 

technologies through the use of small satellites.” The CubeSats will study space weather 

and communications, debris mitigation, maritime shipping container tracking, space 

flight safety, and orbit refinement. 
The CubeSats were sponsored by the NRO and NASA and were developed by the Space 

and Missile Defense Command, The Aerospace Corporation, University of Southern 

California, University of Colorado, California Polytechnic State University, Morehead 

State University, University of California Berkley and the Lawrence Livermore National

Lab. 

The NRO is a joint Department of Defense-Intelligence Community organization 

responsible for developing, launching, and operating America’s signals, imagery, and 

communications intelligence satellites to meet the national security needs of our nation.

-NRO-
In-Person Attendees: The Commercial/Industrial Pumps Working Group Meeting

Meeting Date: Wednesday, June 18, 2014

Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Phone Fax Email

Alascio, Jeff Product Group Manager ABB, Inc. 16250 W.Glendale Drive New Berlin WI 53151 262-785-3214 262-780-5144

Barbour, Robert R. Vice President - New 

Business Development

TACO, Inc. 583 Bedford Street Fall River MA 02720 401-842-8000 x 

822

508-674-6880

Boteler, Rob Principal Confluence Energy 2488 Annapolis Way St. Charles MO 63303-2905 314-422-5270 N/A

Case, Greg Senior Vice President - 

Research

TACO, Inc. 1160 Cranston Street Cranston RI 02920 401-942-8000 x 

327

401-942-1980

Eckman, Tom Conservation Manager 

Power Devision

Northwest Power and Conservation 

Council (NPCC)

851 SW Sixth Avenue,

Suite 1100

Portland OR 97204-1348 503-222-5161 503-820-2370

Fernstrom, Gary Sr. Project Manager CA IOU(s) Pacific Gas & Electric 

(PG&E)

13055 Parkhurst Drive Oakland CA 94619 510-363-1787 N/A

Handzel, Mark W. Vice President, Product 

Regulatory Affairs Applied 

Water Systems

Xylem 8200 North Austin Avenue Morton Grove IL 60053 847-983-5807 847-510-0441

Hu, Jiangang Project Engineer, Power 

Electrical

Rockwell Automation 6400 West Interprise Drive Mequon WI 53092 262-512-2418 262-512-7181

Huber, Albert F. President Patterson PO Box 790 Toccoa GA 30577 706-886-2101 x 

2860

706-886-0023

Mauer, Joanna Technical Advocacy 

Coordinator

Appliance Standards Awareness 

Project (ASAP)

529 14th Street NW,

Suite 600

Washington DC 20045 202-507-4034 N/A

Potts, Douglas E. Senior Design Engineer American Water 1025 Laurel Oak Road Voorhees NJ 08043 856-727-6131 856-727-6139

Sivigny, Jay Marketing Manager Flowserve Corporation 5310 Taneytown Pike Taneytown MD 21787 410-756-3534 410-756-3266

Starr, Louis Codes and Standards 

Engineer

Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance 

(NEEA)

421 SW 6th Suite 600 Portland OR 97204 503-688-5438 N/A

Towsley, Greg Director Regulatory and 

Technical Affairs

Grundfos Pumps Corporation 17100 West 118th Terrace Olathe KS 66061-6593 913-227-3414 559-346-6414

Waltner, Meg Manager, Building Energy 

Policy

Natural Resources Defense Council 

(NRDC)

111 Sutter Street, 20th 

Floor

Aan Francisco CA 94104 415-875-6187 415-875-6161
#### Walker, Appellant, vs. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Company, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Walter F. Mayer*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Shaw, Muskat & Sullivan*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1179 

To exempt the aging process of distilled spirits from the production period 

for purposes of capitalization of interest costs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2015 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. PAUL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To exempt the aging process of distilled spirits from the 

production period for purposes of capitalization of interest costs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Advancing Growth in 

5 the Economy through Distilled Spirits Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘AGED Spirits Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. PRODUCTION PERIOD OF DISTILLED SPIRITS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 263A(f) of the Internal 

9 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1179 IS

1 (1) by redesignating paragraph (4) as para2 graph (5), and 

3 (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol4 lowing new paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(4) EXEMPTION FOR AGING PROCESS OF DIS6 TILLED SPIRITS.—For purposes of this subsection, 

7 the production period shall not include the aging pe8 riod for distilled spirits (as described in section 

9 5002(a)(8)).’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply to the production of distilled spirits 

12 that begins on or after the date of the enactment of this 

13 Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-7214

REV. THOMAS L. DAVIS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BROOKS P. GOLDSMITH, Judge of Circuits Courts/Retired; RACHEL 

DEANGELIS, Asst. Solicitor/State Prosecutor; CHRISTIAN D. ANDERSON, 

Beaufort County Sheriff Dept.; CARMEN T. MULLEN, 14th Circuit Court Judge,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. 

Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (9:23-cv-03059-BHH)

Submitted: March 28, 2024 Decided: April 2, 2024

Before KING and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Louis Davis, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7214 Doc: 11 Filed: 04/02/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Rev. Thomas L. Davis appeals the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing with prejudice his pro se amended 

complaint. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error.*

 Accordingly, 

we affirm the district court’s order. Davis v. Goldsmith, No. 9:23-cv-03059-BHH (D.S.C. 

filed Nov. 15, 2023 & entered Nov. 16, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Davis’ informal brief does not challenge the district court’s conclusion that some 

of his claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Accordingly, he has 

forfeited appellate review of that aspect of the district court’s order. See Jackson v. 

Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; 

under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”).

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7214 Doc: 11 Filed: 04/02/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
Order filed June 4 , 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00 297

- C V

____________ IN RE L. CHARLES MONCLA, JR., J. C LARKE LEGLER , II , WILLIAM RESTREPO, DANIEL T. LAYTON, LAYTON CORPORATION, PLATINUM ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC., AND PLATINUM ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC., Relator s

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 234 th D istrict Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20 12

- 30972



### ABATEMENT ORDER

On April 2 1, 2014 , relators
, L. Charles Moncla, Jr., J. Clarke Legler, II, William Restrepo, Daniel T. Layton, Layton Corporation, Platinum Energy Holdings, Inc., and Platinum Energy Solutions, Inc., filed a petition for writ of2 mandamus in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov = t Code Ann. ' 22.221. In the petition,

r elator s asked that this court compel The Honorable Wesley War d , Judge of the
2 34 th District Court, Harris Cou nty, Texas , (1) vacate his March 31, 2014 order overruling relators’ special exceptions enter ed in trial court cause number
2012

- 30972 , styled Starstream Capital, LLC, et al. v. L. Charles Moncla, Jr., et al. ; (2) grant the special exceptions; (3) strike real parties in interest’s pleadings; and (4) dismiss the case with prejudice.

On June 2, 2014, relator s informed this court that the parties have agreed to settle the underlying dispute, subject to the execution of a mutually acceptable settlement agreement. Accord ingly, we issue the following order :

T he original proceeding is abated for a period of thirty d ays from the date of this order, at which time the parties are directed to advise the court of the status of
the settlement. Th e original proceeding is treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket. The original proceeding will be reinstated on this
court’s active docket when the parties file a motion to dismiss the original proceedin g or other dispositive motion. The c ourt also will consider an appropriate
motion to reinstate th e original proceeding, or the court may reinstate the original proceeding on its own motion

.
PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Jamison

.
Form of Common Stock Certificate



 Exhibit 4.2 
  

			
	No.             	  	                     Shares

 SPHERIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 
 COMMON STOCK 
 This Certifies That
                                         
                                         
                   is the owner of
                                        
                                         
                                         
                   Shares of the Capital Stock of 
 Spheric Technologies, Inc. 
 transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in 
 person or by attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed 
 by its duly authorized
officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto affixed 
 this          day of
                     A.D.          
  

							
		 	  
	 		 	  

		 	Secretary	 		 	President
Opinion filed October 31, 2014

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-14-00082-CV

__________

JOSEPH SCANLON, Appellant

V.

REAL STAR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Bell County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 76,683

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s brief in this case was originally due on July 28, 2014. After this 

appeal became unduly stalled due to the failure of Appellant’s retained counsel to 

file an appellate brief, we extended the deadline on our own motion and attempted 

to contact Appellant’s retained counsel several times after being informed in 

August that he would be filing the brief “in the next few days.” On September 30, 

2014, this court issued an order directing counsel to file a brief on behalf of 
2

Appellant on or before October 10, 2014. In the September 30 order, we informed 

Appellant that, if his brief was not received by 3:00 p.m. on October 10, this appeal 

could be dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1) 

and 42.3. As of today, Appellant has yet to file a brief or a motion for extension 

and has not responded to this court’s order or the inquiries regarding his brief. 

Accordingly, we conclude that the appeal should be dismissed based upon 

Appellant’s failure to prosecute the appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3.

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM

October 31, 2014

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of QIAGEN N.V., does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                                                       
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2006 |  | /s/ Peer M. Schatz Peer M. Schatz Managing Director and Chief Executive
Officer       
|                      |  |                                                                                       
|                      |  |                                                                                       
|                      |  |                                                                                       
|                      |  |                                                                                       
|Dated: March 31, 2006 |  | /s/ Roland Sackers Roland Sackers Deputy Managing Director and Chief Financial
Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.16

                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                            LOAN AND PLEDGE AGREEMENT

         THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE LOAN AND PLEDGE AGREEMENT (this
"AMENDMENT") is made as of February 12, 2001 by and between World Commerce
Online, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "COMPANY"), and William Kistler as
agent for Kistler Associates and Managing Partner, an individual (the "LENDER").

                                R E C I T A L S :

         WHEREAS, for value received, the Company and Lender executed a Loan and
Pledge Agreement dated as of January 16, 2001 (the "LOAN DATE") in the amount of
Two Hundred Fifty Thousand dollars ($ 250,000) (the "LOAN AGREEMENT"); and

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Lender agree to amend and modify the Loan
Agreement as of the Loan Date to clarify certain provisions.

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein
and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:

         1.       AMENDMENT TO THE LOAN AGREEMENT. The ", or" shall be deleted
from the end of Section 3.5(i), and the following shall be added:

                  "or under substantially similar terms as those set forth in
                  this Agreement, or"

         2.       EFFECTIVE TIME OF AMENDMENT. The amendment and modification to
the Loan Agreement as set forth in Section 1 above shall be retroactively
effective as of the Loan Date.

         3.       NON-MODIFICATION. Except to the extent amended and modified
hereby, all terms, provisions and conditions of the Loan Agreement shall
continue in full force and effect and remain unmodified and enforceable.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment effective
as of the Loan Date.

                                       WORLD COMMERCE ONLINE, INC.



                                       By: /s/ Mark E. Patten
                                          -------------------------------------
                                       Mark E. Patten, Chief Financial Officer

                                       LENDER



                                       By: /s/ William Kistler
                                          -------------------------------------
                                       Name: William Kistler, as agent for
                                             Kistler Associates and Managing
                                             Partner, as Lender