alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Form of Stock Option Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
  

					
	 	 
	 NOTICE OF GRANT OF STOCK OPTIONS
 AND OPTION AGREEMENT
  
	 	 Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation
 ID: 77-0138960
  

			
	 [OPTIONEE]
	 	Option Number:	 	[            ]
	 [ADDRESS]
	 	Option Plan	 	2008
	 [ADDRESS]
	 	Employee ID:	 	[            ]
	 [ADDRESS]
	 		 	

 You (the “Optionee”) have been granted a Stock Option (this
“Option”) to purchase Common Stock of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation (the “Company”), subject to the terms and conditions of the Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation Amended and Restated 2001 Stock Incentive Plan
(the “Plan”) and this Stock Option Agreement as set forth below. 
  

					
	 Date of Grant:
	 	[            ]
	 Total Shares Granted:
	 	[            ]
	 Exercise Price per Share:
	 	$[            ]
	 Type of Option:
	 	[            ]
	 Expiration Date:
	 	[Ten years from the date of the grant]

 This Option shall be exercisable, in whole or in part, according to the following vesting
schedule: 
  

					
	 Number of Shares
	 	 Vest Date

	[            ]	 	[1 year and 1 day from grant date]
	[            ]	 	[2 years and 1 day from grant date]
	[            ]	 	[3 years and 1 day from grant date]
	[            ]	 	[4 years and 1 day from grant date]

 The exercise of the options shall be conditioned upon the following: (i) at least one year
and one day has passed since the date of the grant of this Option; (ii) the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) by the Company of financial statements for the fiscal years ended September 30,
2006 and 2007 on an Annual Form 10-K; (iii) the filing with the SEC by the Company of its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008; (iv) the filing by the Company of a registration statement on Form S-8 with the SEC to
register the offer and sale of the common stock underlying this Option; and (v) the common stock underlying this Option is listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market or such other national securities exchange as described in Section 18 of the
Securities Act of 1933. 
 This Option may be exercised for a period of thirty (30) days after termination of employment from the
Company or such longer period as may be applicable upon Death or Total and Permanent Disability of the Optionee, or by other written agreement with the Company, according to the terms and conditions of the Plan, but in no event after the Expiration
Date set forth above. 
 [signature page follows] 







 Option Agreement Signature Page 
 By your signature and the Company’s signature below, you and the Company agree that these options are granted under and governed by the terms and
conditions of the Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation Amended and Restated 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. 
  

					
	  
	 		 	  

	Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation	 		 	Date
			
	  
	 		 	  

	[OPTIONEE]	 		 	Date
Order entered September 18, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 20 - 00624 - CV MELISSA BREWER, Appellant

V. COMPASS BANK, Appellee On Appeal from the 429th Judicia l District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429 - 02438 - 2019

ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s September 17, 2020 motion for an extension of time to file her brief on the merits . In her motion, appellant explains that she is trying to obtain counsel to assist her with this appeal. She requests a sixty

- day extension
. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to November 16, 2020
. /s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
**Exhibit 15.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-7166, 333-107491, 333-12372; 333-127393 and 333-145171) pertaining to the QIAGEN N.V. 1996 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Option Plan, the QIAGEN N.V. Amended and Restated 2005Stock Plan, the Digene Corporation Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan, the Digene Corporation Amended and Restated Omnibus Plan and the Digene Corporation Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option Plan of our report dated March 30, 2007,with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of QIAGEN N.V. as of December 31, 2006 and for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 included in the Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31,2007. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

March 19, 2008

McLean, Virginia
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1357 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 86
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1357

To extend authority relating to roving surveillance, access to business 
 records, and individual terrorists as agents of foreign powers under 
the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 until July 31, 2015, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 14, 2015

 Mr. McConnell introduced the following bill; which was read the first 
                                  time

                              May 18, 2015

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend authority relating to roving surveillance, access to business 
 records, and individual terrorists as agents of foreign powers under 
the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 until July 31, 2015, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSIONS OF AUTHORITY UNDER THE FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE 
              SURVEILLANCE ACT OF 1978.

    (a) Roving Surveillance and Access to Business Records.--Section 
102(b)(1) of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 
2005 (50 U.S.C. 1805 note) is amended by striking ``June 1, 2015'' and 
inserting ``July 31, 2015''.
    (b) Individual Terrorists as Agents of Foreign Powers.--Section 
6001(b)(1) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 
2004 (50 U.S.C. 1801 note) is amended by striking ``June 1, 2015'' and 
inserting ``July 31, 2015''.
                                                        Calendar No. 86

114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1357

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To extend authority relating to roving surveillance, access to business 
 records, and individual terrorists as agents of foreign powers under 
the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 until July 31, 2015, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 18, 2015

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of ZOLL Medical Corporation of our report dated November 6, 2001, included in
the 2001 Annual Report to Shareholders of ZOLL Medical Corporation.

Our audit also included the financial statement schedule of ZOLL Medical
Corporation listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
pertaining to the ZOLL Medical Corporation 1992 Stock Option Plan (Form S-8 No.
333-68403, Form S-8 No. 33-90764 and Form S-8 No. 33-56244), the Non-Employee
Directors' Stock Option Plan (Form S-8 333-68401) and the 401(k) Saving Plan
(Form S-8 333-38048) of our report dated November 6, 2001, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of ZOLL Medical Corporation incorporated by
reference in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30,
2001, and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the
financial statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of ZOLL
Medical Corporation.




ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
December 26, 2001


                                  Page 34 of 34
### SERVED: March 21,2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTOPHER McCANN DOCKET NO. FAA-2014-0405 (Civil Penalty Action)


### ORDER REASSIGNlNG PROCEEDING t· ·." "'- . I.:

. '! .•**:~ ~/**  ·,_ :_ .. L !.:;-..

Administrative Law JudgeRichard C. Goodwin has transferred to the Food and Drug Administration. Accordingly, this proceeding is hereby reassigned from Judge Goodwin to Administrative Law Judge Douglas M. Rawald. Any dates set for hearing or prehearing conference are suspended until further notice. All other orders remain in full force and effect absent further order. 

### SOOR.DERED.

Attachment-Service ListSERVICE LIST - BY 

### U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001
Christopher McCann, Respondent 109 4th Avenue North Sartell, MN 56377 ONE COPY

Jonathan C. Bringewatt, Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration Office ofRegional Counsel (AGL-7J) 2300 East Devon Avenue Des Plaines, IL 60018 DESK: 847-294-7063 MAIN: 847-294-7313 ·FAX: 847-294-7498

EMAIL:jonathan.bringewatt@faa.gov The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5I21 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 Docket No. FAA-2014-0405 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WI000, Washington, DC 2059I; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
NRO Satellite Successfully Launched Aboard 

Delta - IV 

A National Reconnaissance Office payload was successfully launched aboard a Delta-IV evolved

expendable launch vehicle (EELV) from Space Launch Complex (SLC) 6 at Vandenberg Air 

Force Base, CA, on June 27, 2006.

"The magnitude of this mission's success cannot be overstated. It was the first NRO launch on 

the Delta-IV booster, the nation's first security space mission from SLC 6, and the first EELV 

launch from Vandenberg AFB. Collectively it is a tribute to the team work of the entire 

government and industry team that made it happen," said Col James Norman, director of the 

NRO's Office of Space Launch and mission director for the launch.
#### State vs. Brooks and another.

*March 9*

March *11, 1909*

*Criminal law: Rape: Conviction of person aiding.*

One who was present and aided and abetted another to commit-rape may himself he convicted of rape although he did not have-carnal knowledge of the woman.

CeRtipied from the circuit court for Vilas county: A. H. Reid, Circuit Judge.

*Question answered in the affirmative.*

Both defendants were in due form charged with the crime-of rape. The proof was to the effect that *Brooks*had carnal knowledge of the body of the prosecutrix, the act being characterized by all essentials of the crime charged, that *Burns-*was present and aided and abetted *Brooks*in the commission of the offense, but did not himself have carnal knowledge of the woman. Both were in due form found guilty, and the-cause was duly reported to this court for answer to the ques*561tion of whether, under such a charge and. such proof, it was competent to so convict *Burns.*While the cause was pending here a question similar to that certified up was presented in *Vogel v. State, ante,*p. 315, 119 N. W. 190, and January 5, 1909, decided in the affirmative, whereupon a request was made, signed by the circuit judge who reported the cáse, by the defendant *Burns,*and by his attorney, as well as by the prosecuting attorney of Vilas county, for answer to be made to the question submitted as aforesaid in accordance with the 'decision in the *Vogel Case,*and for a return of the record as soon as practicable to the circuit court for Vilas county.

Per Curiam:

The question submitted is in accordance with the decision of this court in *Vogel v. State, ante,*p. 315, 119 N. W. 190, answered in the affirmative, and the case is remanded to the circuit court for Vilas county, Wisconsin, for further proceedings according to law,' and the clerk of this court is directed to remit the record as speedily as practicable.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6969** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ANTONIUS HEIJNEN , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District o f South Carolina , at Anderson
. G. Ross Anderson, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 8:03

- cr - 00045

- GRA

- 6; 8:11

- cv - 70051

- GRA )

Submitted : November 15, 2011 Decided: November 18, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Antonius Heijnen, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circ uit.2 PER CURIAM: Antonius Heijnen seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2011 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S .C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies th is standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 4 84

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Heijnen has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal content ions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000888239
<NAME> GEODYNE INSTITUTIONAL/PENSION ENERGY INCOME LTD PSHP P-8
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         488,063
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,232
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               576,295
<PP&E>                                       9,258,214
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,107,067
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,727,442
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,727,442
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,727,442
<SALES>                                      1,322,349
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,408,029
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  898,447
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                509,582
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            509,582
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   509,582
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Lattice Incorporated (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joe
      Noto , Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Lattice Incorporated and will be retained by Lattice Incorporated and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.








Dated:
      June 12, 2007


/s/
                Joe NotoName:
                Joe Noto
              Title:
                Chief Financial Officer
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1362 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to clarify waiver authority 

regarding programs of all-inclusive care for the elderly (PACE programs). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 18, 2015 

Mr. CARPER (for himself and Mr. TOOMEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to clarify 

waiver authority regarding programs of all-inclusive care 

for the elderly (PACE programs). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY RE4 GARDING PACE PROGRAMS. 

5 (a) CLARIFICATION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY RE6 GARDING PACE PROGRAMS.—Subsection (d)(1) of section 

7 1115A of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1315a) is 

8 amended— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1362 IS

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘(other than subsections 

2 (b)(1)(A) and (c)(5) of section 1894)’’ after 

3 ‘‘XVIII’’; and 

4 (2) by striking ‘‘and 1903(m)(2)(A)(iii)’’ and 

5 inserting ‘‘1903(m)(2)(A)(iii), and 1934 (other than 

6 subsections (b)(1)(A) and (c)(5) of such section)’’. 

7 (b) SENSE OF THE SENATE.—It is the sense of the 

8 Senate that the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

9 should use the waiver authority provided under the 

10 amendments made by this section to provide, in a budget 

11 neutral and expeditious manner, programs of all-inclusive 

12 care for the elderly (PACE programs) with increased oper13 ational flexibility to support the ability of such programs 

14 to improve and innovate and to reduce technical and ad15 ministrative barriers that have hindered enrollment in 

16 such programs. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INCOME
STATEMENT AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          15,886
<SECURITIES>                                    13,037
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,772
<INVENTORY>                                        601
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,453
<PP&E>                                          12,032
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,602
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,531
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,495
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,702
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,531
<SALES>                                         60,603
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,603
<CGS>                                           13,573
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,856
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,324
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,143
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,181
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,181
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.54
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                               Exhibit 23.1


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements No.'s 33-95194, 33-95192, 33-98688 and 333-44367


                                             /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
                                             -----------------------
                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Boston, Massachusetts,
March 25, 1999