alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### WILLIAM LATHAM v. HENRY H ROLLINS.

An action fey a sheriff against one of Ms deputies, for failing to take bail upon a *capias ad respondendum,*whereby the sheriff had to pay $175, as special bail, is founded upon an implied contract, of which the Superior Court had no jurisdiction, the amount demanded being under $200.

*(Winslow*v. *Weith,*66 N. C. Rep. .482; *Frailiak*v. *The Southern Express Oo,,*67 N. C. Rep. 1, cited and approved.)

This was a civil action by a sheriff against his deputy for a misfeazenee in office, tried at the Spring Term, 1871, of the Superior Court of Ashe county, before his Honor, *Mitchell,*J.

The substantial facts are fully set out in the opinion of Justice BtNüm.

On the trial below, the plaintiff' had judgment, from which defendant appealed.

*455
      *Folk*ds Armfield, for appellant.

No counsel *contra*in this Court.

Eykum, J.

A writ of *capias ad respondendum*wa sissued from tbe Superior Court of Ashe against one Oliver, and placed by tbe sheriff in the hands of the defendant, his deputy, to execute and return. The defendant served the process but failed to take bail, and Oliver fled the country. The plaintiff in the action proceeded to judgment and execution against Oliver, and on the return of the execution, “ nothing to be found,” brought his action against the sheriff as special bail, and recovered judgment for $176, the amount of the judgment, interest and cost recovered again.st Oliver. Having paid the judgment the plaintiff, the sheriff, brought this action against the defendant, his said deputy, to recover the said sum. Has the Superior Court jurisdiction ? The aetion is not in *tort,*but on the implied contract of the deputy, arising out of his office, to repay to his principal any sum that he might have to pay by reason of the default of the deputy. In this case the relief prayed is to recover the sum of $176, the amount which had been recovered of the plaintiff as special bail. There are two decisions of this Court in point, and decisive of this ease. *Winslow*v. *Weith,*66 N. C., 432, was where an action was brought in the Superior Court to recover $152, illegal excess of taxes paid by the plaintiff to the sheriff under protest. A demurrer to the jurisdiction was sustsined. *Frœlick*v. *Southern Express*Company, 67 N. C. 1, was where the plaintiff alleged that he had delivered to the Express Company an article valued at less than $200, and averred its loss by negligence and demanded judgment for a sum over $200, by way damages. The Court then held that the action was on contract, and that the Superior Court had no jurisdiction under the Constitution, Art. 4, sec. 33, and that this xvould be so, even if the complaint had been in tort, in one of that class of eases, where prior to the Code, the plaintiff could have elected to declare in in either tort or contract. That question, how*456ever, does not arise here because the complaint is in contraéis and for a less sum than $20&.

There is error.

Per CuriaM. Judgment reversed arid action dismissed.
THOMAS F. ROSENBLUM, FORMER HUSBAND

, Appellant,

v.

ANNE R. ROSENBLUM, N/K/A ANNE R. MOORE, FORMER WIFE
, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISP OSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 3203

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 3, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County

. W. Gregg McCaulie , Judge

. Thomas F. Rosenblum, Former Husband, pro se

, Appellant

. Geraldine C. Hartin, Orange Park , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. Helmich v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , 136 So. 3d 763, 764

(Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

ROWE, MAKAR, and KELSEY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED
PETROLEUM HELICOPTERS, INC.
1995 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
   
    
    to provide that voting Common Stock may be issued under the Plan only to Al A.
Gonsoulin rather than to Carroll W. Suggs;
    
    to revise the definition of the term Change of Control to provide that a
merger, consolidation or other reorganization of the Company shall constitute a Change of
Control only upon consummation of such transaction rather than upon the approval of such
transaction by the Board of Directors of the Company and to make certain other changes to
address restricted stock units; and
    
    to delete sections of the Plan that imposed restrictions on the transfer of
Common Stock and the payment of withholding taxes in Common Stock that were formerly
required for compliance with Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 1934
Act), but which are no longer applicable.
       Change of Control.




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



PHI, INC.By:
    /s/ Michael J. McCannMichael J. McCannChief Financial Officer and Secretary 3
**DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ADDITIONAL**  **SUAS’**

The P hantom 3 Professional s UAS Operational User Manual describes, in detail, the policies and procedures for Petitioner ’ s supplement to the 333 Exemption request FAA 2015 - 5593 - 0001 . To assist the FAA in its s afety assessment of Petitioner ’ s proposed additional s UAS, below is a summary of operational limitations and conditions . 1. The s UAS weigh s a maximum of 2 .9 lbs. with permanently attached sensor . 2. Flights will be operated within line - of - sight of the trained PI C and V O. 3. Flights will be terminated no later than 25% power reserve. 4. Flights will be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet AGL (typically 200 feet AGL) 5. Minimum crew for each operation will consist of the s UAS PIC and V O. 6. The s UAS PIC will be an FAA licensed commercial , private or sport utility pilot. Below is an overview of the Petitioner ’ s P hantom 3 Professional specifications. Additional operational information is available in the P hantom 3 Operations User Manual (Attachment B ) and Qui ck Start Guide (Attachment C ) . 

### Phantom 3 **Professional**

**Battery** 6000 mAh LiPo 2S **Phantom 3 A dvanced**  **Weight** 1280g (with battery & propellers)**Hover A ccuracy**  **(Ready to Fly)** Vertical: +/- 0.1 m (when Vision

Positioning is active) or +/- 0.5 m Horizontal :1.5m **Ma x A** **scent / Descent Speed**  Ascent: 5m/s

Descent: 3m/s **Ma x Flight Speed**  16m /s (ATTI mode, no wind) **Diagonal Length** 590mm **Controllable Range of Gimbal**  Pitch - 90°to +30°
-10P-SECREf

-NB-NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON, D.C.

• km14.4A

NAND

OL SYST

lananneil"

THE NRO STAFF

9 September 1976

NOTE FOR SS-3

SUBJECT: Security Problem with DIA Briefing

Lt Colonel Cain called to report a security problem

that occurred yesterday in a briefing given at the DIA

school. The problem was reported to him by NSA people

who attended. As I understand the problem, the existence

of the NRO,to include some insight into its organization,

how it operates, SORS tasking, etc, were presented at the

TOP SECRET level with no further compartments or caveats.

There was at least one known foreign national in the group.

When the speaker was questioned, he responded that three

years ago this would have been compartmented but times

have changed.

I understand this briefing was a part of a program

called "Project Dialog." Admiral Inman gave the introduction and a Mr. Hayes was the briefer, using charts

which I believe were supplied by Mr. John Hughes.

I believe that this briefing presented under Project

Dialog is perhaps only one of a spectrum of briefings being

prepared to "get the word out" to a larger body of people.

I think we should work closely with DIA to find out what it

is they are putting together and the audiences they intend

to address. Would you please take the necessary action to

find out if we do have a problem and what'we should do to

resolve it. Thanks.

FREDERICK L. HOFMANN

Colonel, USAF

cumensoDelete ThisextupT pima

weisout.a cos TOP

li

iEeRET

klICUTIVI MOIR Ilan IIXIMPTION CAT!

GORY III2 INCLAIIMIrf ON IMP OCT

CONTROL NO Internal 

COPY OF COPIES

PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 12.1


                            CABOT INDUSTRIAL TRUST
                      Computation of Ratio of Earnings to
                Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends (a)
                            (Dollars in thousands)



<TABLE> 
<CAPTION>                            

                                                     For the Nine 
                                                     Months Ended 
                                                     September 30,
                                                         1998       
                                                     ------------- 
<S>                                                  <C> 

Income (loss) from continuing operations
   before minority interest expense and earnings 
   from equity investments..........................  $    36,091
Plus interest expense and amortization
   of deferred financing costs......................        3,317
                                                      -----------

Earnings before minority interest
   expense and fixed charges........................  $    39,408
                                                      ===========

Fixed charges and preferred stock
   dividends (b), (c)...............................  $     3,779
                                                      =========== 

Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges
   and preferred stock dividends....................       10.43x 
                                                      =========== 
</TABLE> 

----------------------
(a)  The Company completed its initial public offering on February 4, 1998.

(b)  There was no preferred stock outstanding during the period ended 
     September 30, 1998.

(c)  Fixed charges consist of interest expense (including amortization of 
     deferred financing costs) and capitalized interest.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

HomeHistoryCryptologic HistoryHistorical FiguresHistorical Figures View

# NSA Historical Figures

                Download            

# Katharine Swift

Katharine Swift  a teacher from Michigan  came to Washington  D.C. to help the war effort in 1942. She started out at Arlington Hall working weather codes and quickly moved into codebreaking when she expressed interest to an analyst working on a machine run of a French code book.

Ms. Swift then became a premier linguist and codebreaker at NSA  reconstructing many codes during her career. Well known for her manual "Standards & Techniques of Code Reconstruction " Ms. Swift was awarded the Exceptional Civilian Service Award by NSA in 1972. 

Ms. Swift retired in 1972 after a distinguished 30 year career. She worked for two years after retirement as a reemployed annuitant at the National Cryptologic School teaching code reconstruction. 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Biographyhistorical figureKatharine Swiftwomen in cryptology
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 34 (Friday, February 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9266-9267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03524]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9019-6]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.
    Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements Filed 02/09/2015 
Through 02/13/2015 Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

    EIS No. 20150035, Final EIS, FHWA, TX, US 69/Loop 49 North Lindale 
Reliever Route, from IH 20 Southwest of Lindale to US 69 North of 
Lindale, Review Period Ends: 03/23/2015, Contact: Vernon Webb 903-510-
9296.

    EIS No. 20150036, Second Final Supplement, BOEM, AK, Chukchi Sea 
Planning Area, Oil and Gas Lease, Sale 193, Review Period Ends: 03/23/
2015, Contact: Tim Holder 703-787-1744.

    EIS No. 20150037, Draft EIS, USFS, OR, Granite Creek Watershed 
Mining Project, Comment Period Ends: 04/06/2015, Contact: Sophia Millar 
541-263-1735.

    EIS No. 20150038, Final EIS, USFS, ID, Crooked River Valley 
Rehabilitation Project, Review Period Ends: 04/13/2015, Contact: Jennie 
Fischer 208-983-4048.

    EIS No. 20150039, Draft EIS, USACE, TX, Lower Bois D'Arc Creek 
Reservoir, Comment Period Ends: 04/21/2015, Contact: Andrew Commer 918-
669-7400.

    EIS No. 20150040, Final EIS, USFWS, ID, Deer Flat National Wildlife 
Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan, Review Period Ends: 03/23/2015, 
Contact: Annette de Knijf 208-467-9278.

Amended Notices

    EIS No. 20150028, Final EIS, USFS, ID, Clear Creek Integrated 
Restoration Project, Review Period Ends: 03/16/2015, Contact: Lois Hill 
208-935-4258. Revision to FR Notice Published 02/13/2015; Correction to 
Agency Contact Phone Number should be 208-935-4258.

    EIS No. 20150034, Final EIS, USACE, OR, Double-crested Cormorant

[[Page 9267]]

Management Plan to Reduce Predation of Juvenile Salmonids in the 
Columbia River Estuary, Review Period Ends: 03/16/2015, Contact: Robert 
Winters 503-808-4738. Revision to FR Notice Published 02/13/2015; 
Correction to Document Status should be Final EIS.

    Dated: February 17, 2015.
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2015-03524 Filed 2-19-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF

PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, J. David Berkley, the President of Sterion Incorporated (the Company) in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/  J. David Berkley



J. David Berkley

Title:  President, Sterion Incorporated

Dated:  May 12, 2003



I, Mark Buckrey, the Chief Financial Officer of Sterion Incorporated (the Company) in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/  Mark Buckrey



Mark Buckrey

Title:  Chief Financial Officer, Sterion Incorporated

Dated:  May 12, 2003
3 / 4 /15

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Review of Ready Biodegradability Study for CASRN 6381

- 77

- 7 , D

- erythro

- Hex

- 2

- enoic

acid, .gamma.

- lactone, monosodium salt

FROM: David G. Lynch

Assessment Branch 5 Risk Assessment Division

TO: John Schaeffer

Chemical Control Division

THRU: Nhan T. Nguyen

Chief, Assessment Branch 5 Risk Assessment Division

The study titled D

- erythro

- Hex

- 2

- enoic acid, .gamma.

- lactone, monosodium salt [CASRN 6381

- 77

- 7] : Assessment of Rea d

y Biodegr ad ability : CO2 Evolu tion Test conducted by Harlan Laboratories LTD (Harlan Study Number 41401177) for Univar USA Inc dated January 28, 2015 has been reviewed. The study was submitted to fulfill Ready Biodegradability testing requirements under the TSCA section 4 HPV2 test rul e. The study was conducted in compliance with UK GLP standards. The biodegradation method was based on OECD Guideline 301B, Ready Biodegra da bility: CO2 Evo l ution Test and EPA OCSPP Guideline 835.3110 Ready Biodegradability

. The criteria for validity, i.e., reference compound biodegradation, non

- inhibition of microorganisms by the test substance, acceptable differences between ext r emes of replicate values, total CO 2 in inoculum controls at the end of the test, and percent of inorganic carbon in test sys tem at the beginning of the test relative to the total carbon. The test is considered valid and the study is acceptable to meet the requirements for Ready Biodegradability testing

. The results indicate that the test substance biodegraded 70% over the 28 d ay test period and satisfied the 10

- day window criteria where 60% biodegradation must be observed within 10 days of biodegradation exceeding 10%. Thus the test substance can be classified as readily biodegradable.

Please contact me at 564

- 8532 if you have any questions.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS



I, Mark Buckrey, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of STEN Corporation;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: May 14, 2008 | /s/ Mark Buckrey       
|------------------ | -----------------------
|                   | Chief Financial Officer
#### Evie Cuellar et al., Appellants, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

[772 NYS2d 872]

*531In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), dated October 29, 2001, which granted the oral application of the defendant City of New York, made after the completion of the plaintiffs’ opening statement, to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and granted the separate oral application of the defendant Queens Surface Corp., pursuant to CPLR 4401, made at the close of the plaintiffs’ case, to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it for failure to establish a prima facie case.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted *(see*CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof granting the oral application of the defendant City of New York to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it, made after the completion of the opening statement, and substituting therefor a provision denying that application; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted against the defendant City of New York.

The Supreme Court erred in granting the oral application of the defendant City of New York, made after the completion of the plaintiffs’ opening statement, to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it. Such applications are disfavored, and, generally, “the prospect of a dismissal on opening exists only when, from all available indications, the case is doomed to defeat” *(Gleyzer v Steinberg,*254 AD2d 455 [1998] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Under the circumstances, it cannot be said that the plaintiffs cannot recover *(cf. Clifford v Sachem Cent. School Dist. at Holbrook,*271 AD2d 470 [2000]).

The oral application of the defendant Queens Surface Corp. (hereinafter Queens Surface) made at the close of the plaintiffs’ case to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it was properly granted. “A common carrier owes a duty to an exiting passenger to stop at a place where the passenger may safely disembark and leave the area” *(Jenkins v New York City Tr. Auth.,*262 AD2d 455 [1999]). There was no evidence that Queens Surface was aware of or reasonably should have been aware of a dangerous condition in the roadway *(see Diedrick v City of New York,*162 AD2d 496 [1990]). Smith, J.P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.