alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  Exhibit 10.1

                                                      Aetna Inc.
                                                      151 Farmington Avenue
                                                      Hartford, CT  06156-3124



March 2, 2001

VIA FACSIMILE AND OVERNIGHT MAIL

Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York,
    as Administrative Agent under the Credit
    Agreement referred to below
60 Wall Street, 5th Floor
New York, NY  10260-0060
Attn:  Maria Dell'aquila,
      Vice President
Fax:  212-648-2291

Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York
c/o J.P. Morgan Services Inc.
500 Stanton Christiana Road
Newark, DE  19713-2107
Attn:  Nancy Baiz,
      Associate
Fax:  302-634-1872

RE:  NOTICE OF COMMITMENT REDUCTION EVENT

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Reference is made to the $1,500,000,000 Bridge Credit Agreement dated as of
December 13, 2000 among Aetna Inc. (formerly known as Aetna U.S. Healthcare
Inc.), as Borrower, the banks listed on the signature pages thereof and Morgan
Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as Administrative Agent (the "CREDIT
AGREEMENT"). Terms not otherwise defined herein are defined as set forth in
the Credit Agreement.

The Borrower hereby gives notice of a Commitment Reduction Event pursuant to
Section 2.06(d) of the Credit Agreement. The Commitment Reduction Event (an
issuance by the Borrower of $900 million aggregate principal amount of debt
securities pursuant to a public offering) was consummated on March 2, 2001,
and the Borrower received Net Proceeds of $888,695,500 therefrom. The Net
Proceeds consist of $889,195,500 cash proceeds received by the Borrower net of
SEC filing fees of $500,000.


<PAGE>   2




Page 2
Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York,
as Administrative Agent
Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York,
c/o J.P. Morgan Services Inc.
March 2, 2001






Very truly yours,

AETNA INC.



By: /s/ Alfred P. Quirk, Jr.
   ------------------------------------------
Name:  Alfred P. Quirk, Jr.
Title:  Vice President, Finance and Treasurer
EXHIBIT
21.1


Subsidiaries
of the Registrant




Braintech
Canada, Inc., a British Columbia corporation


100% owned
by Braintech, Inc.




Braintech
Government & Defense, Inc., a Delaware corporation


100% owned
by Braintech, Inc.




Braintech
Consumer & Service, Inc., a Delaware corporation


100% owned
by Braintech, Inc.




Braintech
Industrial, Inc., a Delaware corporation


100% owned
by Braintech, Inc.




Shafi,
Inc., a Michigan corporation


100% owned
by Braintech, Inc.




Shafi
Innovation, Inc., a Michigan corporation


80% owned
by Braintech, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,794
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,526
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,942
<PP&E>                                       2,358,252
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,232,808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 171,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          667,589
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       799,187
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,351,830)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   171,436
<SALES>                                         56,623
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,223
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,737
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               128,781
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (85,295)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (85,295)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (85,295)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (01)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the use of our report dated March 1, 2005 (which audit report
expresses an unqualified opinion on the financial statements and includes
Comments by Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to U.S. Readers on
Canada-U.S. Reporting Differences when there are changes in accounting
principles that have a material effect on the comparability of the Corporation's
consolidated financial statements and changes that have been implemented in the
financial statements, such as the changes described in Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 40-F
of PetroKazakhstan Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche

TOO Deloitte & Touche
Almaty, Kazakhstan
March 30, 2005
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance










EXHIBIT 4.1








	Getting Ready Corporation
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
SHAREHOLDER NAME
THIS CERTIFIES THAT
NUMBER OF SHARES
COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:
ISLAND STOCK TRANSFER
CORPORATE SEAL





 


 










 






EXHIBIT 4.1








	The following abbreviations, when used inthe inscription on the face of this certificate,
shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws
or regulations.




	TEN COM (TIC)
TEN ENT
JT TEN (J/T)
UNIF GIFT MIN (TRANS) ACT
(UGMA) (UTMA)
For Value Received
Shares of the Capital Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably
constitute and appoint
to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution
in the premises




	SIGNATURE GUARANTEE
Order entered June 17, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00344 - CV IN RE PRICE DRILLING RIG N O. 5 COMPANY, Rela t or Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 17 - 16505



### O RDER Before Justices Bridges, Partida

- Kipness, and Carlyle Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus

. /s/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1363 

To require the Secretary of Energy to submit to Congress a report assessing 

the capability of the Department of Energy to authorize, host, and 

oversee privately funded fusion and fission reactor prototypes and related 

demonstration facilities at sites owned by the Department of Energy. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 18, 2015 

Mr. CRAPO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Energy to submit to Congress 

a report assessing the capability of the Department of 

Energy to authorize, host, and oversee privately funded 

fusion and fission reactor prototypes and related demonstration facilities at sites owned by the Department 

of Energy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPORT REQUIRED. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

5 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy, 

6 in consultation with the National Laboratories, relevant 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1363 IS

1 Federal agencies, and other stakeholders, shall submit to 

2 the Committees on Energy and Natural Resources and 

3 Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 

4 Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the 

5 House of Representatives a report assessing the capability 

6 of the Department of Energy (referred to in this section 

7 as the ‘‘Department’’) to authorize, host, and oversee pri8 vately funded fusion and fission reactor prototypes up to 

9 20 megawatts thermal output and related demonstration 

10 facilities at sites owned by the Department. 

11 (b) CONTENT.—The report submitted under sub12 section (a) shall describe the results of an assessment of— 

13 (1) the safety review and oversight capabilities 

14 of the Department; 

15 (2) potential sites capable of hosting research, 

16 development, and demonstration of prototype reac17 tors and related facilities for the purpose of reducing 

18 technical risk; 

19 (3) the existing physical and technical capabili20 ties of the Department and the National Labora21 tories relevant to research, development, and over22 sight; 

23 (4) the efficacy of the available contractual 

24 mechanisms of the Department, including— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1363 IS

1 (A) cooperative research and development 

2 agreements; 

3 (B) work for others agreements; and 

4 (C) agreements for commercializing tech5 nology; 

6 (5) potential cost structures relating to physical 

7 security, decommissioning, liability, and other long8 term project costs; and 

9 (6) other challenges or considerations identified 

10 by the Secretary of Energy, including issues relating 

11 to potential cases of demonstration reactors up to 2 

12 gigawatts of thermal output. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090004.eng.txt

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: 

PMN: 09-0004

Focus Ready Draft 12/15/2008

ENGINEER: Prothero \ CLM

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

OTHER USES: 

MSDS: Yes Label: No

file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090004.eng.txt (1 of 7) [3/15/2010 1:48:52 PM]
file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090004.eng.txt

CRSS :

Chemical Name: 

S-H20: 0.011 g/L @

VP: 1.0E-6 torr @

MW: 

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

Neat: Liquid (est) Mfg: Solution/dispersion,

Proc/Form:

End Use: Destroyed. GPC NAVG MW:

. The submitter provided two

sets of GPC data. The first set,

 The

second set, 

Consumer Use: No

SAT (concerns) (12/09/2008):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Eco: Analogs: 

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P3B2T1 .

Health: 2 Dermal, Inhalation

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1 ppb)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER

file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090004.eng.txt (2 of 7) [3/15/2010 1:48:52 PM]
file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090004.eng.txt

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

P2 Claim: 

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090004.eng.txt (3 of 7) [3/15/2010 1:48:52 PM]
file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090004.eng.txt

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: 

PMN: 09-0004

file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090004.eng.txt (4 of 7) [3/15/2010 1:48:52 PM]
file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090004.eng.txt

RELEASE TOTAL

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090004.eng.txt (5 of 7) [3/15/2010 1:48:52 PM]
file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090004.eng.txt

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: 

PMN: 09-0004

file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090004.eng.txt (6 of 7) [3/15/2010 1:48:52 PM]
file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090004.eng.txt

RELEASE TOTAL

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090004.eng.txt (7 of 7) [3/15/2010 1:48:52 PM]
USCIB: 4. 2/34 

3 January- 1955 

M!MORANDlM FOR THE MF.M.BERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Revision of USCIB Directive No. 6. 

Reference: USCIB 4.2/32, dated 17 December 1954. 

l. By vote sheet reply to the reference all members of USCIBEC 

have approved without change the revised version of Directive No. 6 

contained therein. 

2. The above decision of USCIBE.C is herewith presented for USCIB 

consideration. In the absence of objection by a:n:y member by 1700, 

Thursday, 13 January 1955, the decision will be considered approved. 

USCIB: 4.2/34 

24
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS



I, Kenneth W. Brimmer, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of STEN Corporation;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date  August 11, 2006 | /s/ Kenneth W. Brimmer 
|--------------------- | -----------------------
|                      | Chief Executive Officer
Commitment Letter



 Exhibit 10.1 
 SEQUOIA ENTERPRISES, L.P. 
 VESSEL PARTNERS, L.P. 
 October 8, 2008 
 BDO Seidman, LLP 
 Ladies and gentlemen 
 In connection with BDO Seidman, LLP’s audit of
the consolidated financial statements of Diedrich Coffee, Inc. (the “Company”) as of and for the year ended June 25, 2008, Sequoia Enterprises, L.P. (“Sequoia”) and Vessel Partners, L.P. (“Vessel” and collectively
with Sequoia, the “Lenders”) make the following commitments: 
  

	 	1.	The Lenders commit to provide additional financial support to the Company on commercially acceptable terms not to exceed $5 million over the course of 18 months from the date of
this letter. Such amount will provide cash flow sufficient to operate the Company on a going concern basis during that period. 

  

	 	2.	To evidence the commitment in the paragraph above, the Lenders will enter into a $5 million commitment letter or note agreement with the Company as soon as possible and no later
than 15 days from the date of this letter. 

  

	 	3.	In addition to the above, Sequoia will also extend the maturity date on commercially acceptable terms on the $2 million note purchase agreement with the Company that is set to
expire on March 31, 2009. The maturity of the note will be extended to at least March 31, 2010. 

  

	 	4.	The Lenders will not require that the Company agree to any covenants more onerous than those presently existing in the agreements between the Company and Sequoia.


  

	 	5.	The Lenders have the intent and the ability to fully fund the financial commitments that are outlined in this letter. 

  

	 	6.	I have the authority as the General Partner of each of Sequoia Enterprises, L.P. and Vessel Partners, L.P. to make investment decisions and financial commitments outlined in this
letter. 

  

	 	7.	The Lenders’ commitments set forth in this letter shall immediately cease and terminate if the Company receives gross proceeds from any transaction of $5 million or more or
enters into a credit or loan agreement with a party other than the Lenders for at least $5 million. 

  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ Paul Heeschen
	 Paul Heeschen
 General Partner, Sequoia Enterprises,
L.P.
 General Partner, Vessel Partners, L.P.
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

FT. GEORGE G. MEADE, MD. 

Serial: EXSAB 50-58 

24 April 1958 

Mr. William F. Friedman 

310 2nd Street, s. E. 

Washington, D. c. 

Dear Mr • Friedman: 

Inclosed herewith is the agenda. for the meeting of' the 

National. Security Agency Scientific Advisory Board to be held 

22-23 M8\Y" 1958. The minutes of' the last meeting will be avail.-

able at this meeting and a.re not inclosed because of their 

classification. 

I hope that your schedule will permit you to join us f'or 

the meetings on these two days. 

Arrangements a.re being made for those members who will need 

transportation to Fort Meade on the mornings o! the 22nd and 23rd 

to assemble at the Naval Security Station, 3801 Nebraska. Ave., N.W. 

at 8: 30 A. M., where staf'f' cars will be avail.able. Board members 

will be brought back to the Naval Security Station at the end of 

each day's session. 

~ This correspondence may be declassified upon removal 

~? inclosure. 

!""' Sincerely, 

of' the 

Ex:ecutive Secretary 

NSA Scientific Advisory Boa.rd 

Incl: 

Agenda 

pursuant to E .o. 1352a
,... . r 

.. ~'"·~ 

USCIB: 5.2/36 l April 1954 e - 'l'QP SEStll'l' H.S. EDS BJ: 

;pNITED §TATES COMMQNIQATIONS lmJLLIQENCE BQ.\RD 

AGENPA Fm 

One hundred s_econd Meeting at 1430, on Frid~, 

9 April 1954, in the Projection Room, 

Administration Building, CIA, Washington, D.C. 

Mt-, Allen w. Dulles. Chairman 

PART I - Agenda Items 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

.Papers to be distributed. 

USCIB: 5.2/.36 - 1 -

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 01-23-2015 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

TD-P seclt8r 

31 
l°I'~ I ... 

·- ... -" -.. ~ .... 

- - - - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~----------------.......... 

uscm: 5.2/36 ~L 86-36/50 USC 3605 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

e 'POP SBGB! T:J.S. '!P.a!IS 0HEi¥ 

Item No. 

1. 

2. 

3. 

e. 5 • ... _-

PART II - Background Information on Agend; ;items 

Subject and Srnnmary 

At the lOlst Meeting 

ector NSA. would approach 

The Director, NSA, had informal discussions with Brigadier 

Tiltman, who relayed the proposal to London. USCIB 29.17/3 contains 

specific recommendations by the U.K. on this subject, 

Disclosure of U.K n ircuit CURY11 to the enc .- At its\1Qth Meeting, 

on 27 January 1954, USCIBEC considered USCIB 29.3 16, which consisted or 

a recommendation by the Director, NSA, that his position against the 

delivery of "Circuit MERCURY" to the French be supported by USCIB. 

lBCIBEC approved the Director, NSA's, recommendation (USCIB 29 • .3/22) 

and this decision was forwarded to USCIB for action. otricial \.USCIB 

approval is noted in USCIB 29.3/21. The Board's decision was transmitted t.o U.K. authorities by the Director, NSA. The matter has\ now 

been reopened by the U.K. in a personal '"appeal to the Chairman, tJSCIB, 

by M!l.jor General Sir John Sinclair in his dual capacity as Chairman 

of LSIB and of the Cypher Policy Boe.rd, requesting that the proposal 

for release of "Circuit MERCURY" to the French be reconsidered by our 

Board. This request, and a detailed summary or actions in the matter 

to date are contained in USCIB 29 • .3/27 and the enclosure therewith. 

Increase in Scope of USCIB Authority (EI.INT) - This is an original 

proposal being made directly to USCIB by the member representing 

the Department ot Defense. The details of the proposal are contained 

in USCIB 9.4/1. 

USCIB 

USCIB: 5.2/.36 - 2 -

T<>P SE<JR:BT
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT TITUS, an individual,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

STANLEY HORRELL, an individual; JIM

MUNYON, an individual; FRANK

PRIMOZIC, an individual; PAM

WOODWORTH, an individual; TIM

COE, an individual; ROGER

MCKINLEY, an individual; BILL

HARRINGTON, an individual,

 Defendants - Appellants,

 and

CITY OF PRAIRIE CITY, a municipal

corporation; DIANE CLINGMAN, an

individual; ANNA BASS, an individual,

 Defendants.

No. 11-35664

D.C. No. 2:08-cv-01330-SU

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Patricia Sullivan, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

FILED

OCT 22 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Argued and Submitted October 10, 2012

Portland, Oregon

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Stanley Horrell and other members of the Prairie City Council appeal from

the district court’s denial of summary judgment in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action

brought by Robert Titus. Because Titus had no protected property interest in his

continued employment, he suffered no due process violation, and appellants are

entitled to qualified immunity. We reverse.

Titus was an at will employee under the terms of the City Charter. The

Charter states that the City Council may appoint “such other officers and

employees of the city as the Council deems necessary or advisable and may

remove any of them at any time within their discretion.” Titus offers no evidence

to prove that he was not appointed by the City Council, and he does not dispute

that he was employed by the city. Though Titus argued that the Charter does not

apply to his position because it is not a specifically listed “officer” position, Titus

was at least an “other . . . employee[]” whom the City Council could remove

without limitation. Since Titus had no entitlement to his continued employment,

he had no protected property interest, and his due process rights were not violated. 

See Lawson v. Umatilla Cnty., 139 F.3d 690, 691-92 (9th Cir. 1998). Appellants
3

are entitled to summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity because they

did not violate Titus’s due process rights. See Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223,

232, 236 (2009).

REVERSED and REMANDED.
Exhibit 23.1


                    Consent of Independent Public Accountants


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  to  the  Registration
Statement  on Form S-8 of River  Valley  Bancorp  (the  "Company"),  File Number
000-21765,  of our report dated February 15, 2002 on the consolidated  financial
statements  of the Company  which  report is  incorporated  by  reference in the
Company's 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed pursuant to the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934.


/s/ BKD, LLP
-----------------------------
BKD, LLP


Indianapolis, IN
March 27, 2002