alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Horton & wife *v.*Reavis.

From Granville.

In case for slander, the proof of speaking' the words, must correspond in substance at least with the charge in the declaration. ■

Case for words spoken.-Tho declaration charged that ~efendant had said, the wife of Plaintiff, while single, bad sexual intercourse with a negro, per quod she lost a n~arriage with one Waddy, who was addressing her, and had offered her marriage.

The evidence offered was, that Defendant had said there was a report in the neighborhood that the Plain*381tiff’s wife (then sole,) had had connexion with a man of the wrong colour 5 and upon being asked, by the person to whom such declaration was made, whether he believed the report to be true, the Defendant answered, he did not know well how to do so, as she was a clever, smart, ingenious girl.

It also appeared, that Defendant, after speaking the words proven, said he did not believe the report to be true, at the time of communicating it to the w.itness3 and further, it was proved that there was in circulation such a report as Defendant had mentioned.

Seaweix,, Judge, who presided, instructed the jury, that there was a difference between stating the existence of the fact, as charged in the declaration, and stating a *report*of the existence of such fact 3 that the first, as applied to the charge in the declaration, *imported guilt*3 that the latter, as it related to the evidence, did not3 and informed the jury, that to entitle the Plaintiff to a recovery, the proof offered, must correspond in substance, with the allegation contained in the declaration. The jury found for the Defendant, and a rule for a new trial having been discharged, Plaintiff appealed to this Court.

Tavxoh, Chief-Justice.

It is necessary that the proof of speaking the words, should correspond with the charge in the declaration, at least in substance. The declaration, contains a direct charge against the Defendant, for having uttered the slanderous words 3 but the proof is, that he said there was such a report in the neighborhood, and that he expressed, at the time of speaking the words, his difficulty in believing them. This is a material variance from the charge, and altogether insufficient to support it. The verdict was proper, and the direction of the Court clearly right.
#### Fahringer, Plaintiff in error, vs. The State, Defendant in error.

*January 13*

January *30, 1912.*

*Constitutional law: Usury: Criminal law.*

Sec. 1691, Stats. (Laws of 1907, ch. 412), relating to usury, is a valid enactment.

ERROR to review a judgment of the municipal court of Milwaukee county: A. 0. Backus, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Eor the plaintiff in error the cause was submitted on the brief of *E. M. McVicker.*

Eor the defendant in error there was a brief by the *Attorney General, Bussell Jackson,*deputy attorney general, and *Winfred G. Zabel,*district attorney, and oral argument by *Mr. Jackson.*

Kerwin, J.

This is a writ of error to review a judgment of conviction for loaning money at a rate of interest above the legal rate. The plaintiff in error was convicted of the alleged crime of loaning money at usurious rates of interest, and sentenced to pay a fine of $25 and costs of suit and in. default be imprisoned.

The contention of the plaintiff in error is that sec. 1691, Stats. (Laws of 1907, ch. 412), creating the offense of which plaintiff in error was convicted, is unconstitutional and void.. The validity of this law is, as we understand the case, the only question involved upon this appeal. This question was settled by this court against the contention of plaintiff in error-in *State ex rel. Ornstine v. Cary,*126 Wis. 135, 105 N. W. 192, and the doctrine underlying that decision reiterated in-later cases in this court. Therefore discussion of the question seems unnecessary.

*By.the Court.*— The judgment is affirmed.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release #04-14

Contact: (703) 808-5050 April 11, 2014

NROL-67 Lifts Off on April 10, 2014

A National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) payload was successfully launched 

aboard a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket from Space Launch Complex41E, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS), Florida, at 1:45 p.m. EDT, on 

April 10, 2014.

“This afternoon’s successful launch of NROL-67 demonstrates once again the 

unassailable commitment of NRO and its industry partners to the national 

security of the United States and its allies. I applaud the dedicated team that 

made this possible and express my gratitude to every member of that team,” said 

Colonel Clint Hunt, USAF, Director, NRO Office of Space Launch.

NROL-67 is the first of three 2014 NRO launches. The next NRO launch is on 

schedule for May 2014, also from CCAFS.

-NROThe NRO is a joint Department of Defense–Intelligence Community organization responsible for 

developing, launching, and operating America’s intelligence satellites to meet the national 

security needs of our nation.
4NROAPPIROVED FOR 

.1..1ULy 2016., 

n SFECIM2..A REQ,1.1.111F,D* 

CT y0 1967 

FOR TIE DEPUTY DIRr"LsTC 113 

SUBJECT: MOL Advanced Planning 

REFERR:ICI.,': (a) Deputy Director ,

/vic*i no. sm3L79/53 of 3 October 167. 

Reference. (a) discussed a briefing of MOL Advanced Planning Options, 

which .vias given to MOL PrograM,.Office .12" -rsonnel on October 5; 1.967, and 

sugger:ted that a •sirdlar briefing,be,:Sclieduled for Dr.:Flax and 

: General Ferguson. • 

found the briefing to bc;., very "timely, stimulating, and a good 

comprehensive study of the decisions we face in defining a MOD Program 

which could follow the baseline prosza.. In the discussions that 

followed the briefing, I outlined4for•Lt .Colonel Skantze some of the 

areas which I feel should be highlighted and some of the plaruying 

guidance dec.aions We need from Dr. ;Flax and General Ferguson. 

I request that 'the briefing:be revised to reflect these discussions 

and that it be condensed to about: silt t hoUr in length. Unless • : • 

inform,:d otherwise, I shall asses that the revised briefing will be 

availtble in about two weeks, but in tiny case; not' later :than the next 

101„, Program Review Council Meeting,_Which maybe a good opporiunity .0 

seek:the guidance needed for our MOL:Advanced Planning effort. 

15: 

DAMES T. STETART 

.ajor General, USAF 

ice Director, mOL' Pro 

Copies to: 

SAFSLS Official File:: 

SAFSL,'Read File 

• SCG Read File 

por) ..520Q.10 .3")CBS _NOT „APPLY 

Page 1 -of 1 page. 

topyji:tt k copies 

aAFPL:', = 

1.f..11SP:ECIAL:AOCESS•,REOIRE 

••Captqoolsby/SAFSLS/50947/9,.0 `.67 :jdk,
# CA2005138EN.01000401.xml

| 7.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 138/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 138/4

---

Publication of a vacancy for

DIRECTOR

DIRECTOR

(Grade A*14)

(Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations)

COM/2005/1802

(2005/C 138 A/04)

The Commission is seeking to appoint a Director for Antitrust in the Directorate-General Competition.

Applicants must be a citizen of one of the 10 new Member States of the European Union (Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia).

The senior official will be selected and appointed by the Commission according to its selection and recruitment procedures. Salaries and conditions of employment are those laid down in the Staff Regulations for A*14 grade officials of the European Communities. The Commission applies an equal opportunities policy.

If you want to apply, you must register via the Internet by going to the website http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/seniormanagementvacancies/index_en.html - http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm and following the instructions concerning the various stages of the procedure. Please note that you must have an e-mail address; this will be used to identify your registration. The closing date for registration is 7 July 2005. Online registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time.

---
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1554 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and to direct the Secretary 

of the Interior to conduct a study with respect to stormwater runoff 

from oil and gas operations, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 11, 2015 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and 

to direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a 

study with respect to stormwater runoff from oil and 

gas operations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Focused Reduction of 

5 Effluence and Stormwater runoff through Hydrofracking 

6 Environmental Regulation Act of 2015’’ or the ‘‘FRESH7 ER Act of 2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1554 IS

1 SEC. 2. STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM OIL, GAS, AND MIN2 ING OPERATIONS. 

3 (a) LIMITATION ON PERMIT REQUIREMENT.—Sec4 tion 402(l) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 

5 (33 U.S.C. 1342(l)) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking paragraph (2); 

7 (2) by redesignating paragraph (3) as para8 graph (2); and 

9 (3) in paragraph (2)(C) (as so redesignated), by 

10 striking ‘‘402(l)(3)(A)’’ each place it appears and in11 serting ‘‘subparagraph (A)’’. 

12 (b) DEFINITIONS.—Section 502 of the Federal Water 

13 Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1362) is amended— 

14 (1) by striking paragraph (24); and 

15 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (25) and (26) 

16 as paragraphs (24) and (25), respectively. 

17 (c) STUDY.— 

18 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Inte19 rior shall conduct a study of stormwater impacts 

20 with respect to any area that the Secretary deter21 mines may be contaminated by stormwater runoff 

22 associated with oil or gas operations, which shall in23 clude an analysis of— 

24 (A) measurable contamination in the area; 

25 (B) ground water resources in the area; 

26 and 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1554 IS

1 (C) the susceptibility of aquifers in the 

2 area to contamination from stormwater runoff 

3 associated with the oil or gas operations. 

4 (2) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the 

5 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 

6 submit to Congress a report on the results of the 

7 study conducted under paragraph (1). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1488 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to allow for fair application 

of the exceptions process for drugs in tiers in formularies in prescription 

drug plans under Medicare part D. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 3, 2015 

Mr. NELSON (for himself and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to allow 

for fair application of the exceptions process for drugs 

in tiers in formularies in prescription drug plans under 

Medicare part D. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Part D Beneficiary 

5 Appeals Fairness Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1488 IS

1 SEC. 2. FAIR EXCEPTIONS PROCESS FOR DRUG IN TIERS 

2 UNDER MEDICARE PART D. 

3 Section 1860D–4(g)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 

4 U.S.C. 1395w–104(g)(2)) is amended— 

5 (1) in the first sentence— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘for tiered cost-sharing for 

7 drugs included within a formulary and’’ and in8 serting ‘‘for any tiered cost-sharing structure 

9 within a formulary (including a structure that’’; 

10 and 

11 (B) by inserting ‘‘, or provides for different 

12 co-payment or coinsurance amounts for drugs 

13 in different tiers included within the for14 mulary)’’ before ‘‘, a part D eligible individual’’; 

15 (2) in the second sentence, by inserting ‘‘in any 

16 plan formulary’’ before ‘‘could be covered’’; and 

17 (3) by inserting the following before the last 

18 sentence: ‘‘In no case may the Secretary allow a 

19 PDP sponsor to make any element of the tiered 

20 cost-sharing structure (including a tier used for very 

21 high cost or unique items) ineligible for lower-cost 

22 sharing through an exception under this para23 graph.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                            167
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2,726
<ALLOWANCES>                                      116
<INVENTORY>                                     7,672
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               10,925
<PP&E>                                         13,904
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,197)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 24,376
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,473
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              10
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                      4,949
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   24,376
<SALES>                                         5,558
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                5,558
<CGS>                                           2,551
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   2,551
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                2,271
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   566
<INCOME-TAX>                                      226
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               340
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      340
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.03



</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.2
**CERTIFICATIONS**
     In connection with the annual report of SK Telecom Co., Ltd. (the“Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Sung Min Ha, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:
 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
Date: May 31, 2004                                        /s/ SUNG MIN HA   Name:  Sung Min Ha   Title:  Chief Financial Officer
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release #08-14

Contact: (703) 808-5050 November 24, 2014

Terry Duncan, Director of NRO’s Communications Systems Directorate, 

Awarded Highest Civilian Service Award from Department of Defense

Mr. Terry Duncan was honored with the Department of Defense Distinguished 

Civilian Service Award on November 7, 2014, at the Pentagon. Mr. Duncan was 

noted for distinguished civilian service from October 2011 through May 2014 as 

the Director of NRO’s Communications Systems Directorate. This award is the 

highest civilian award given by the Department of Defense.

“I’m honored to receive the distinguished civilian service award from the 

Department of Defense,” Mr. Duncan said. “The NRO workforce takes pride in 

supporting our warfighters, and my award would not be possible without their 

dedication and collaborative support of NRO’s mission.” 

Mr. Duncan was recognized for "significantly decreasing information technology 

and mission transportation costs.” According to the award citation, “His efforts 

directly resulted in a budget reduction of $600 million over the Future Years 

Defense Program which ensured that the NRO could close its top-line budget 

under sequestration. This freed up vital resources to focus on the high priority 

missions of the NRO, the Intelligence Community, and the Department of 

Defense. 

Mr. Duncan transformed the NRO’s communication infrastructure and 

revolutionized the way that mission data gathered by the NRO collection 

satellites were delivered to the ground for processing and dissemination to joint 

warfighters, the Intelligence Community, and Department of Defense leaders. 

The distinctive accomplishments of Mr. Duncan reflect great credit upon himself 

and the Department of Defense.”

The award ceremony was hosted by Jessica L. Wright, Under Secretary of 

Defense for Personnel and Readiness, who paid tribute to eight people who 

distinguished themselves from more than 800,000 other Defense Department 

employees in winning the top civilian employee award.
"You lead with integrity, you lead with critical thinking, and you lead with 

passion," Wright said to the civilian award winners during the ceremony where 

she presented the 59th annual Department of Defense Distinguished Civilian 

Service Awards and the 10th annual David O. Cooke Excellence in Public 

Administration Award.

Wright noted the eight Distinguished Civilian Service Award recipients' 

contributions toward innovation and efficiency in electronic commerce, advanced 

stealth technologies, and customer service, among others. "Thank you for the 

support you give our men and women of the armed forces," she said.

The Distinguished Civilian Service Award was created 59 years ago to recognize 

a small number of employees whose careers reflect exceptional devotion to duty 

and extremely significant contributions in policy, science, technology, and 

administrative fields.

-NROThe NRO is a joint Department of Defense–Intelligence Community organization responsible for 

developing, launching, and operating America’s intelligence satellites to meet the national 

security needs of our nation.
# C_2005106EN.01003002.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/30

---

Action brought on 10 February 2005 by Cornelius Rozemeijer and others against the Council of the European Union

(Case T-61/05)

(2005/C 106/64)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Council of the European Union was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 10 February 2005 by Cornelius Rozemeijer, residing in Alkmaar (Netherlands), Gaston Vaesken, residing in Sanary-sur-Mer (France) and Pierrette Vaesken, residing in Sanary-sur-Mer (France), represented by G. Vandersanden, L. Levi and A. Finchelstein, lawyers.

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| 1. | annul the applicants' May 2004 pension slips, with the effect of applying a weighting coefficient at the level of the capital of their country of residence, or at least a weighting coefficient adequately reflecting differences in the cost of living in the places where the applicants are deemed to incur expenses. |
| --- | --- |

1.

annul the applicants' May 2004 pension slips, with the effect of applying a weighting coefficient at the level of the capital of their country of residence, or at least a weighting coefficient adequately reflecting differences in the cost of living in the places where the applicants are deemed to incur expenses.

| 2. | order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are identical with those in Case T-35/05 Elisabeth Agne-Dapper and others v Commission.

Elisabeth Agne-Dapper and others

Commission

---
• 

USCIB: 5/453 

REF ID:A68064 

CONFIDEfffIAL 

8eet::1rity Iafermatiea 

Gfi!BM!Na SESE'm'i'Y INf9F!Hl'fION 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: I 

9 July 1953 

Subject: USCIB Master Requirements List. 

24 

The USCIB Master Requirements List was approved unanimously by USCIB as of 3 July 19531 in accordance with the 

procedure set forth in paragraph 11 of USCIB Directive No. 1. 

Owing to the large number of copies requested by Board 

members and in view of the limitations or the reproduction 

facilities, it is not anticipated that the subject list will 

be circulated until 13 July 1953. 

USCIB: 5/453 

CONFIDEN'f'IAL 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-09-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B
*March 7, 1933.*

#### Jacobitz, Respondent, vs. Braatz, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Rouiller & Dougherty*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *L. J. Fellens*of Fond du Lac.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
# CE2004078EN.01054302.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/543 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/543

---

(2004/C 78 E/0565)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3417/03

by Mario Borghezio (NI) to the Commission

(18 November 2003)

Subject:   Eurostat scandal — unanswered questions

Subject:

Although it is feasible that a general reform process may take several years, is it possible that some cases of irregularity and even fraud may have continued beyond 1999 and even until 2002? Is the Commission responsible or not for the way in which it tackled the issue after 1999?

---
Exhibit 21.1

# LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

Bio-Detek, Incorporated, incorporated
in Massachusetts. ZMI France, S.A.R.L., organized in France. ZMD Corporation, incorporated
in Delaware. ZOLL Medical (U.K.) Ltd, incorporated in United Kingdom. ZOLL Medical
Deutchland (GmbH), incorporated in Germany. ZOLL Medical Canada, incorporated in Canada.
Pinpoint Technologies, Inc., incorporated in Delaware. ZOLL Medical France S.A.,
incorporated in France. ZOLL Medical Australia Pty Limited, incorporated in Australia. ZOLL
International Holding BV, incorporated in the Netherlands. ZOLL Medical New Zealand Pty
Limited, incorporated in New Zealand. ZOLL Medical Bermuda Limited, incorporated in Bermuda.
Rev Acquisition Corporation, incorporated in Delaware.