NRO APPROVED Fgq_ - 

E■1_-E-AS. 1 JULY' 2111,5.,;. 

AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND (AFSC) 

OPERATIONS ORDER 

FOR. 

'MANNED ORBITING LABORATORY (PAL) PROGRAM 

ANNEX Q 

DEPARTMENT .OF DEFENSE (DOD) MANAGER RELATIONSHIP 

WITH THE 

DIRECTOR, MANNED ORBITING LABORATORY PROGRAM 

REFERENCES: 

a. Secretary ofDefenie Memorandum Subject: "Assignment of 

Responsibilities of the Department of Defense-Manager for. Manned Space 

Flight Support Operationi,", dated 6 September 1664. 

b. Secretary_of the Air 'Force Order No 117.4, dated 25 August 1965; 

4, SITUATION: 

a. The Department of Defense has been heavily involved in the 

operational support of manned space flight since the early days of 

Project MERCURY. The Secretary of Defense emphasixedthe importance 

and priority of this support :during 1959 by establishing a single point 

of contact within the Department of Defense designated the DOD Representative for Project MERCURY Support Operations. As the workload 

of manned space flight support _operations increased, the directiVe 

designating the responsibility.for - this support was updatedseveral 

° 

times. The current directive (Reference a) applies in support of the 

NASA Manned Space Programs and the Air Force MOL Program._.The individual responsible for exercising this charter is designated the DOD 

Mana,gir fox. Manned.Space' Plight'SupportOperations.- 

Enclosure #1 • . 
NRO APPRQVED FbR 

RELEASE 4 JULY 201.6 

• .... 

b. Over the years the DOD Mkumger, his joint-staff and the operational 

support organizations have built up .a wealth of professional support knowledge, world-wide points of contact and the coordinating procedures necessary, to achieve responsiveness to manned space flight mission operational 

support needs. Close study -of his directive will reveal he is not responsible for initiating development, programming for resources, the direct 

involvement in or usurping of any program responsibility for mission 

. experiments, objectives, or its success. He is charged with providing 

a single point of contact for the coordination of and during missions, 

control of sizeable operational support forces. These forces are 

marshalled and organized to be responsive to the Mission Director for 

operational control of approximately ten thousand Department of Defense 

people in support of NASA PrOject GEMINI missions working under the • 

• 

GEMINI Mission Director. A common base line must be established so 

that • the, DOD Manager may quickly and efficiently shift this operational 

support from APOLLO to MOL or otal:DOD mission 'support to 

NASA may be reduced by the time mOL becomes operational but it can be 

expected to be comparable for'any, manned mission during that time peri 

as a matter of national policy. 

All elements of the MOL -Pregram Office.and, supporting,.Systems 

Command organizations must understand the responsibilities of t&)'DOD . 

Manager.‘and hiSrelitionship 'or.interfaCe with the MCA,. - .There 

is a relatively, clean-ont - interface between NASA .andithe--DOD Manager;. 

-• 
-NR0.APPZOVED FOR 

RELEASE 1- JOLY 2015- 

- _ 

however, the interface between the MOL Program Director and the DOD . 

Manager requires definition because both organizations are within the 

Department of Defense. This interface or dividing line will be the 

MOL Program. organization and the Spate Systems Division on the one 

side and the -DOD Manager s'organizatien and supporting pop resources 

on the other.• This dividing line is comparable to_the NASA APOLLO 

Program organization and the NASA supporting centeri'On'the one side 

and the 60D,Manageiandsuppeitingj)OD:resourCes on the other. This. 

will afford the DOD Manager a common operational support base line for 

all Manned space 'flight, Therefore,:the. MOL Program Director and 

. . 

Mission Director 'will , have three-,principai points of contact for 

specific mission planning and eperatiens; the SSD Nest Wing for 

:• 

launch operationss'the. SSD ScP.fpi'on.orbit network operations and the .

DOD Manager for recovery and all other operational, support outside the 

resources of the Program Office and Spice Systests Division. This inter. 

face will t (1) Result in approiimately the same levelof Operational 

support responsibility for the DOD'Manager for any and all manned space 

flight operations, (2) Be in cong`ortance'witli the Secretary of Defense 

Memorandum, and (3) Offer_effieient-suPpOrt service to -the-Air Force 

. . MOL Program (seee',Attachment4 

2.: MISSION 

The DOD Manager is .respOnsible to the 'SeCretarY. of Defense ttirchiiik 

the Joint Chiefs of Staff to provide mi • ' ssion operational support 'resources' 

, - 

to the managers of manned "spawflight4rogramtf(see_AitaChment:2 
NRO APPROVi6:FOIR 

RCLEASE 1-J1661/2015 

TASK ORGANIZATIONS; 

The DOD Manned Space Plight Support: acting-for the 

DOD Manager will exercise coordinating authority to insure that requested 

mission operational support is made available to the Director MOL (see 

Attachment 3), 

4. PLAN OF OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT OF SUPPORT FORCESt, 

a. Under the direction of the DOD. Manager, the DOD Manned Space 

Plight Support Office (DDMS) will_receive the MOL recovery requirements 

, . 

from the MOL Systems.Office.- The RecOvery Uiyision, DDMS,-. will prepare 

a MOL Recovery Plan which will be submitted to the MOL Systems OffiCe. 

During mission periods, the.pop Manager will exercise operational con 

trol of the recovery resources under the direction of the Mission 

Director. 

a - 

b. The MOL Systems Office may require additional operational support 

resources to accomplish the MOL mission q f so: 

(1) The Western Test Range (APWTR) will accept launch °per- . 

ational support requirements fr om the1401, Sy stems Office,.'- These requirerents will also be submitted to DDMS:for coordination,: with the entire. 

manned space flight effort. The'MTR point. of -contact.wiii:bi with the 

SSD/Aerospace Test Wing•IATWYreiponsiblerior launch,: 

(2) "The AssiStant for „Cemeunicati ons to the DOD Manager.: S. • 

, ,,.... . , - 

will accept requirements for:operational Communications 'support from ... 

the MOL Systems- Officei,The'DDMS.X.pointsof contact will be-the SSD/ATW •.,, - . ,• ..,. • e . .. , . . 

responsible for launch,the SSD/Sateilite"Control'Facility:(SOO) which 

.- -.. -.;,.•=i - '-':-: . f:-, -,,''..... -=',; '''.?;' ".'171..'' -. : : ::: ':: :_,s -;•• .• ''l ' • , - 

. , 

is responsible:toMeei the'-on«Orbitriquirementa,- and-the'RecoVery - 

Division, DDMS,' responsible for recovery operations. 
• NRO-ADPROVp:)FOR 

. . 

. REI_,EAE-1 jULY2015 

(3) The Asiistant fox...Network to the DOD Manager (DDMS-H) will 

accept requirements for network operational support from the SSD/SCF. 

,Operational support for network is defined as support from network 

stations other than SCF network stations; this support will include both 

DOD and NASA network- stations if required by the MOL Systems Office. 

The DDMS-H point of contact will be with SSD/SCF. 

(4) The Assistant for Meteorology to the DOD Manager (DDMS-W) 

will accept requirements, for weather reconnaissance and other weather 

support from the MOL Systems Office; 'The DDMS-W point of contact will 

be with the SSD/SCF weather detachment. 

(5) . The Assistant for Public Affairs/Information to the DOD. 

Manager (DDMS.P) will receive guidance and requirements from the MOL 

Systems Office; The DDMS-P points . of contact are MOL. Public Affairs 

Office (PAO), the Secretary of the Air Force- Office of!Information" (SAFOI), 

and the SSD Office of Information. 

(6) The ASsistant for. Bioaatrcniutics to" the. DOD manager (opms.m) 

will accept requirements for groUnd medical Support-frork the 1440L Systems, 

Office. The DDYS0M point of contact Will be ,the SSD/Assistant for 

Bioastronautics (MB). 

C. Attachments 4 and 5 are added.to show the flow of-MOL Operations 

Support` Requirements and the Points of contact :for_coordihating and. 

planning the support , require 

5. TASKS FOR SUBORDINATE UIITSp 

:-.During.non-mission pitriodstthe DOD Manager„has no subordinate 

units; however, he exercises coordinating authorityUnder the Sec:ret 
t4fFk0 APPROVED FOR 

RELEASg.l. JULY 2015 

of Defense through the Joint Chiefs 'of Staff This coordinating authority 

allows the DOD Manager to bring together the required DOD organizations 

resources. Coordinating authority is defined in. the JCS Publication 1 - 

and resources in order to develop'plans for. the use of operational support 

: : • 

• • • . .. • 

"A commander or individual assigned responsibility for coordinating specific functions or activities, involving forces 

of two or more services, or two or more forces of the same 

- - _ 

service. -He:has anthority;t6 require consultation betWeen 

the agencies involved, but does not have the'iuthority to 

compel agreement.'" In the event he is unable to Obtain 

essential agreement, he shall refer the matter 'to the. 

appointing authority.! 

the DOD Manager eicercises operationa 

control, under the Mission Director, the required DOD operational 0 

support resources outside the MOL Program organization and the Space 

• . Systems DivisiOn.- 

5, Atchs 

. 'Comparative Interface 

2.: Marmed Space Mission Requirements .7 

and Mission Support Provided by 

DOD Manager , 

3. Organization-. 

.4._ DOD Manager MOL 'Requirement 

Flow ,Diagram s y- 

• DOD Manager MOL SupPort 

lovi Diagram 

b. During mission periocis, 
NVo APPk.OVE[5 FOR 

RVLEASE ¶ JULY 2015 

• 

i:::%..?ARATIVE INTERFACE 

MOL/APOLLO - VS - DOD MANAGER 

MOL PROGRA. APOLLO PROGRAM 

PROGRAM & MISSION DIRECTORS 

I 

NETWORK RECOV"ZRY 

SSD/SATELLITE : DOD kiANAGETI 

CONTROL FACILITY 

(SCR 

PROGRAM & MISSION DIRECTORS 

• LAUNCH NETWORK 

KENNEDY SPACE GODDARD SPACE 

; CENTER (KSC) FLIGHT CENTER 

(GSFC) 

LAUNCH 

SSD/AEROSPACE 

”EST WING (ATW) 

RECOVERY 

41-566-)774;arr 

000.1011 00110.11■100.0001.11110 

• SSD/ATW RESPONSIBLE FOR LAUNCH 

• SSD/SCF RESPONSIBLE FOR ON-ORBIT 

• DOD MANAGER RESPONSIBLE FOR RECOVERY 

• DOD MANAGER PROVIDES OPERATIONAL 

SUPPORT TO SSD/ATW & SSD/SCF 

• KSC RESPONSIBLE FOR LAUNCH 

• GSFC RESPONSIBLE FOR ON-ORBIT 

• DOD MANAGER RESPONSIBLE FOR RECOVERY 

• DOD MANAGER PROVIDES OPERATIONAL 

SUPPORT TO KSC & GSFC 

DOD RECOVERY FORCES 

• NAVY 

• ARRS 

• WTR 

• ETR 

DOD MANAGER OPERATIONAL SUPPORT 

• DOD COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT 

• DOD LOGISTICAL SUPPORT 

• DOD MEDICAL SUPPORT 

• DOD.LAUNCH SUPPORT BY NRD WTR, ETR 

• DOD NETWORK SUPPORT 

• DOD NETWORK STATIONS (OTHER THAN SCF 

STATIONS FOR MOL SUPPORT) 

• DOD SHIPS 

• DOD AIRCRAFT; 

COMMON SUPPORT 

TO BOTH PROGRAMS 

ATTACHMENT 1 
• • 

ACCEPTS SUPPORT PROVIDES SUPPORT 

REQUIREMENTS 

OPERATIONAL CONTROL 

LL 

Lu 

O 

U 

LU 

ce 

0 0 C 

›- 

W 

0 

CC "- 

a. w 

U

z 

0 

z 

ATTACHMENT 2 

cr 

O 

a. 

a. oz 

.74 

fX 

Z U-1 

< 

'CC 

Z 

UJ 

[r 0 

tu 

IX 

Z 

1:1 

4.01 

za W. 

z 
o o 

VI 

C:3 

ORGAN I ZAT I ON 1.1a 

I.'- 

Li 0 

CIL ICC 

V) CC 

ce 0 

a_ 

u- a_ 

LL.o z vo X 

< C 

— 7: I-- Q 

C', 

— 

-.1 

La- 

• 

—z

z 

0 

I-0 

— 

t.e) 

> 

cc — 0 0 

a 

VI > ZU 

c CU) z 0 X 
1 

1 

oammi.o. 

0 

CH REQUIREMENTS 

SUPPORT REQUIREMENTS 

•

DOD MANAGER 

LA, 

ce 

DINS RECOVERY DIVISION RECOVERY REQUIREMCNTS 

r•••••••••••••••••■.•••••••••••• IMM•••••■••••••••••••••■■• 

0••••■•••••■••00000.0••••••••■•••••••••••••••••■■••••••••■••■•••41.1..........................MOMSOINNY•040••••••••■7 

2••••••••■■•••••••••••••••••••••■•••■•••••14.1.014••••••••••••••••••••••■■••10••••■•■•••••••••••••••••••••••• 

01110.0.11.410011.....0011.11 

1••••••■•••••••••••••• •••••••••■••■•••••••••••••••.., 

I I 

011=0.41■Ner 

•• ■••••■■•••••••■ ••■■• •■■■ ••• ■• 

ATTACHMENT 4 

IL A 

. ,.. 

0 

.): 

A.rij R3 le eg Rx tu X ...I. a a 

1. gt ILI 

. c68— .

ecox •,— : 

< a 

01 

60 c, 5 17: gr 0 55. 

0 z 

w oc ig ..1 to 

..1 

R 

T TTTIT T 

DOD MANAGER MOL REQUIREMENT FLOWDIAGRAM 

a al 

itIC 

8 

0 

U.S 

a 

g 

. LLLL 55. 0 

ce 

ir 

0- N 

W 

a 

U- 

■•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••■••46 

3IC LU 

O 0 

< 

Zo 

Luz 

r oat 

0 >,. 

.04- 

W z 

Cg

2F

w' 2 0 

§i. 814 

• 

1 

u) 

0 0 Li_ CV 

LLI 

›- 

> 

CC W 

(/) 

<I. cc 

0 ti 

QW

Z 
••••••••••••••..•••••••••■ ••••• •••••••••••••••••••••••••••1 

1 MOLPAO/SAFOI DDMS RECOVERY DIVISIO 

a 

BIOASTRONAUTICSSUPPORT 

A 

I 

K SUPPORT 

DONS NETWORK DIVISION 

ImMinlboommn. wywOwww■ 

cx 0 A. 

a. a 6 

oc 

• ■■■•••••111111. 

• 

---1- -I-- 

l . L..... : - • 

I : : 

1 

• 

a 

OC 

..vommeimelmeweewwwwwww...1 Ow•ww•wor•••••• 

.wootwood■ 

1••••••■•••••••••••••••••••••••■■••••••••••••••••••••••••■■•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••■•••■••••••••• ••.m.0.0.04•••••••••••••"...11.11......... 

• 
1■11R0 APPROVED FORRELEASE 1 JULY: 2015 

•ALTERNAilVE: ARRANGEMENTS 

saarow■••• •••••••■■■•••■■••••■•■••■••■■••••• 

. , 

1. The purpose of this enclosure 'is to comment as to why the DOD Manager 

discarded two alternatives, the DOD Manager interface with the MOL Program at USAF level and the interf4cewith the MOL Program at AFSC level. 

2. First, we must look at the 'X%) Manager's task. He and his staff, 

the DOD Manned Space Flight Support Office (DDMS), are in the business 

of providing "support operations" to Manned Space Program Managers. The 

Secretary of Defense Memoranda i of 8 September 1964, subject: "Assignment of Responsibilities of the Department of Defense Manager for Manned 

Space Flight Support Operations," defines the term support operations 

and it includes: 

"Launch range support, network operations, planned and con- 

'-tingency recovery, communications, weather services, arrangements pr medical personnel and supplies, public news media. 

support and other, support services_such astransportation 

and photography." 

Thus, "support operations" make use of support resources that are in 

being, planned and coordinated by the DOD Manager fora Program Manager 

a few months prior to a specific manned space mission. It is important 

to note that the'extent of "support Operations" furnished by the DOD 

Manager is entirely dependent upon the requirements levied upon the DOD, 

Manager by the Program Manager, The DOD Manager provides only that 

support requested. The Secretary Of Defense, realizinvthat economic 

use of a limited supply of support' resources is mandatory, designated 

the DOD Manager as a "single point of contact" for Manned Space Flight 

Program Managers. This means then that the DOD Manager should receive 

the support requirements from all Program Managers so that he can 

properly coordinate the use of these support resources' and eliminate 

possible conflicts in scheduling. „If the DOD Manager should receive 

only a portion of the total requirements for these resources and the 

rest of the requirements were levied'im some other- manner, proper.;, 

coordination and scheduling would be impossible. 

, . . 

3. The- probleM then iEto'determine hOW the DOD Manager:should inter+ 

.face with the MOL Program Director te .best discharg0,:responsihilitips: 

assigned to hlm.by_the SecretarrOf:Defense -- 

Enclosure f2 

• 
'0

.." • 

DIRO APPROVED-F0i3 . : 

RELHEASE-i ,,,J ixy,201 5 

4. One considered interface was between the DOD Nhnager and the Secretary of the Air Force (SAF). This would mean that the DOD Manager when 

coordinating MOL support would consider only the DOD resources outside 

of USAF, It could mean that the Secretary of the Air Force would require 

an organization similar to DNS to coordindte required Air Force resources 

and then insure the proper interface with the rest of DOD. This would -

mean that another organization would be inserted in the loop and possibly 

the DOD Manager would not be aware of the total requirement for the use 

of common support resources and, therefore, conflicts in scheduling could 

result. It would cause confusion in the coordination and control of Air 

Force recovery resources. If the DOD Manager were supporting a current 

NASA mission it would be difficult to switch support to MOL on a compressed 

follow-on schedule because there would be no continuity in the management 

of the supporting forces. This interface would not be in conformance 

with the DOD Manager's charter. Attachment One contains a chart depicting 

this interface and shows those support resources that would be subject '.°:;` 

to conflicts and lack of efficient coordination and control. If the 

requirements were sent directly to DDflS, direct points of contact are 

established to quickly resolve this type of problem. Minimum time .and`_'` 

people would be involved. 

S. Another interface considered was between the DOD Manager and the 

Commander AFSC. This arrangement brings about a similar problem as 

the interface with 'the USAF except on a reduced scale, However, it 

still might require an additional AFSC organization to be responsive 

and to coordinate AFSC support resources common to MOL and NASA missions* 

For example, if the MOL flight plan required augmentation or support 

from an APGC radar at Eglin and it was committed to support NASA earth 

orbit operations and under the coordination and control of the DOD 

Manager, someone would have to coordinate with the DOD Mhnager. Attachment Two contains a chart depicting this interface and lists those AFSC, 

resources that would be subject to conflict* 

6. The MOL Program Director can go direCt to coordinate operationa 

support; however, the nature-of operational support would require 

several points of contact for the Passion Director. In cases where., 

resources are required that are used to support. NASA, those several:' 

points of contact would have to come, to the DOD Manager for coordination. It would be_more efficient to levy the requirement on the 

DOD Manager in the first place* Today the DOD Manager's operating 

procedures are such that in the exercise of coordinating authority 

the free exchange of informatiOrOS encouraged to foster people,and 

organizations to- work and plan together. Assistance is offered to 

solve problems-and insure therthoVeeeired support is marshalled ; 

,.and ready_ to syPPert the mission at lifteeff. 
. 4 J 

NRO APPRQVgD FOR 

RELEASE 9 JULY. 2015 

• 

7. The DOD Manager's directive is worded. so:that he may also be of. 

assistance to arrange for and coordinate the use of NASA resources to-, 

support the MOL mission. The close operational relationship with the 

NASA mission operations people in the common. functional areas of support 

provide an ideal arrangement to insure NASA resources as required are' 

properly committed to support. In fact, this arrangement is working 

. at the present time; for example, the DOD Manager's organization has, 

been arranging for NASA recovery resources to be made available to 

the MOL Systems Office for R&D test purposes.' 

:2 Atchs 

1 .-_ - Interface SAP/DOD Mgr 

'2, Interface APS/DOD Mgr 
•■■

•■■••••• 

A POLLO MISSION DIRECTOR 

DOD MANAGER 

M1101■111.■ 

ICJ 0 

(-) 

w 

1- 

Z < MOL MISSION DIRECTOR 

O 

u —I 

ce LL o 0 

u u a_ LIO W 0- < 

a_ 

In 4/1 — 

. 

LAUNCH AUGMENT 

• 

NETWO RK AUGMENT 

AIRFORCE 

U < Z in I 

• -

• 

CS 0 o a a 

O 1/1 < X CZ 1/1 

X O. CL 3 

AT IONS AUGMENT LL 

U gl) 

Iz 

W 

W 

X 

< 

▪ Z Z 

0 Lu 

0 < 

awQfa 

J 0 re o

0 

 cr 

a. LU 

• 

RECOVERY FORCES 

SUPPORT OPERATIONS FOR MANNED SPACE FLIGHT PROGRAMS 

413 

U. 

595TH ATW 

• 

O 

0 

— ce 

uW O. LI- 

< 111 O. < 

• a. 

0 

x 

• x 

cr U 

0 0 

a. 

a 

ce 

0 —I 

a. 0 . 

az 

(,) 
• 

COMMUNICATIONS AUGMENT 

0 

CC U.1 

6595TH ATW 

v! a 

• 

0 

U h -J -1 T

• 

L".. 0 0 

• ri 0- 

O LLI O. 

a. 14 0 

0 

11J -3 I- °

CX 0 

0 

▪ U < 

us a 

• to H o 

APOLLO MISSION DIRECTOR 

DOD MANAGER 

Z 0 

- 0 -I 

ixX -I 

0 0 

X 

O

0 

. 

LL a. 

N 0 0 

Z 

>- . IX 

W z 3 o > 

X 

X 

I- LU ul 

Z 0 0 

0 Z 

0 Q. LU • ce 

O 0 < X 0 

U3 0 M W 

LL = < Ia CC --I 

00 

< 14 17 

O. Z Z a = 

°- M 0 I- Z 

U 

 3 

0 U 

Z 

V) 

*4 W 4 

-J Z ...I 

• • • 

MOL MISSION DIRECTOR 

a. 

0 

L.)

tu 0 -4 0, 

LL O 

us 

IZ 4/) 
NROAPPRO4V0VOR 

RELEAWIJULY2015 

FEB 2 1 1958 

DDMS 

MEMORANDUM FOR DCS PLANS (SCLSS/LCe1 Maynard), AIR FORCE SYSTE,45 COMANP 

SUBJECT: Operations Order for Manned Orbiting Laboratory Program 

The purpose of this mexorandum is to transmit recommendations on how 

to include proper reference to the DOD Manager for manned Space Plight 

Support Operations in the. Air Force Systems Comaand operations order. 

The recommendations are 

a. A reference :entice appear in the basic document and this 

reference section include: 

(1) Secretary of the Air Force Order No. 117.4, dated 25 Augest 

1965, subject; Director of the Manned Orbiting Laboratory (MOL) Program. . 

(2) Secretary of Defense menerandum of 8 September 1964, jut,- 

ject: Assignment of Responsibilities of the Department of nerenso 

Manager for Manned Space Flight Support Operations. • 

(3) MOL Government Plan for ProgreWMenagement„ dated August 

1965, 

b. The operations order format include a listing of cooperating 

agencies outside of the Air Force Systems Command. The DOD manager 

for Manned Space Flight Support Operations should be included in this 

section. 

C. An additional paragraph be included in the "General Situation" 

section of the operations order.- This paragraph should follow naragra”h 

le and read: 

"The Secretary of Defense has designated and assigned responsibilities to the Department of Defense (DOD) Manager for ilflAnee 

Space Flight Support Operations (Reference a(2). To meet these 

responsibilities, the DOD Manager has established the DOD 

Manned Space Flight Support Office (DDMS). This office as a 

central point of contact for the DOD Manager will coordinate 

Enclosure #3 
NRO AP-PROVEgioF -• 

RELEASel. JULY 2015 

the use of operational support resources that are COMM011 to 

all manned space flight programs. By Reference a(3), the 

Director NOL his requested that the DOD Manager provide a 

MOL Recovery Plan and that he conduct MOL Recovery Operations 

(See Annex 0)." 

a. The Table of Contents should reflect the addition of Annox 0 - bapaTtment of Defense (DOD) Manager Interface with the Director, MOL Program. 

Annex (4 is under development and coordination with the NOL Program nffico 

at the present time. If this action is not complete in tiao to moot 

your suspense date, it is suggested the notation "to be published at a 

later date" be made concerning Annex Q. 

Signed By) 

ROYCE 0. OLSON 

Colonel, USAF 

ROYCE O. OLSON 

Colonel, USAF 

Director, DOD Hanned Snare 

Plight Support Office