alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AutoInfo, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harry
Wachtel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Harry Wachtel
--------------------------------
Harry Wachtel
Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1362 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1362

    To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to clarify waiver 
  authority regarding programs of all-inclusive care for the elderly 
                            (PACE programs).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 2015

Mr. Carper (for himself and Mr. Toomey) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to clarify waiver 
  authority regarding programs of all-inclusive care for the elderly 
                            (PACE programs).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY REGARDING PACE PROGRAMS.

    (a) Clarification of Waiver Authority Regarding PACE Programs.--
Subsection (d)(1) of section 1115A of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1315a) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(other than subsections (b)(1)(A) and 
        (c)(5) of section 1894)'' after ``XVIII''; and
            (2) by striking ``and 1903(m)(2)(A)(iii)'' and inserting 
        ``1903(m)(2)(A)(iii), and 1934 (other than subsections 
        (b)(1)(A) and (c)(5) of such section)''.
    (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services should use the waiver authority 
provided under the amendments made by this section to provide, in a 
budget neutral and expeditious manner, programs of all-inclusive care 
for the elderly (PACE programs) with increased operational flexibility 
to support the ability of such programs to improve and innovate and to 
reduce technical and administrative barriers that have hindered 
enrollment in such programs.
                                 <all>
```
FIRST M
& F CORPORATION





EXHIBIT
32.1





SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATIONS





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of First M&F Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Hugh S. Potts, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





A.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





B.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
            May
      15, 2009




/s/ Hugh S. Potts, Jr.Hugh
      S. Potts, Jr.Chairman
      and Chief Executive
Officer
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of SK Telecom Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: April 30, 2015 |  | /s/ Dong Hyun Jang                   
|                      |  | Dong Hyun Jang                       
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.2








Certification Under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I, Charles R. Bearchell, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of ProElite, Inc. (the “Registrant”), certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-K of ProElite, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





Date: November 18, 2011





/s/ Charles R. BearchellCharles R. Bearchell

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Accounting Officer)
•

--Torsteart----

NSAM 156 COMMITTEE

• 1962 • ESTABLISHED AS AN AD HOC CROUP TO SET NATIONAL POLICY FOR POLITICAL

AND INFORMATIONAL ASPECTS OF SATELLITE RECONNAISSANCE.

1962 • RECOMMENDED POLICY TO THE PRESIDENT WHICH RESULTED IN VC& 2434.

1963 • STUDIED RECONNAISSANCE SATELLITE DISCLOSURE POLICY.

1964 • AGAIN STUDIED DISCLOSURE.

1966 • STUDIED POLITICAL AND SECURITY ASPECTS OF Nal-MILITARX EARTH SENSING

BY NASA.

1968 • STUDIED ARMS LIMITATION AND DISCLOSURE POLICY.

1971 • STUDIED USE OF 10 METER RESOLUTION CAMERA ON SKYLAB.

1972 • STUDIED IMPACT OF • /ALT RATIFICATION ON DISCLOSURE POLICY.

1973 • REVIVED , APPROVED AND MONITORED SKYLAB MISSION PLAW11110 AND OPERATIONS .
• .

. .. •

•

1

A. • •

—TOP-SEeRBILISSUES

NATIONAL SPACE POLICY AGED--NZED UNCHALLENGED AND UNCONSTRAINED SATELLITE

RECONNAISSANCE NONE THAN EVER.

DISCLOSURE POLICY 711 TRANSITORY STAGE—DCI LETTER TO NBC.

CIVIL MAWS NOT COORDINATED CLOSELY WITH HILITARY•RASA LOOUSG FOR

MISSIONS.

INTERNA.TIORAL OBJECTIONS TO ERTS—UN FORUM.

CIVIL AGENCY NEED FOR PHOTOS—AGRICULTURE, ETC..

US INDUSTRIAL BASE HEMMING TO SEE THE POTEIMAL USE--OIL EXPLORATION, EtC.
• o

.--z.. . ...... r..____ ._....._. .._ ..._,

it do...kegeg-t_._

/ .4 .

.•t

A44.:

Av.to:

4 .4.......... ........................

_,eaVe;41:4 et. .. 7 .2_, 1.,..ze,i,%L..4.,........

ek 62. 14'. r..3e.,' a...

-44--.. ,t. agre.

,4, ?rotzev.g..„.e.fle.A. 4%.ci.4-;e: ..e-det-,-41-'

. f::,-1-ce itz.: 7c-4 -4*.4 ,e.-gte

- 244:A4 ../eXee Z .Z4e ee.--t e ..e.404.

;est.. .441

C.; a..14(

42-. 1hie .-eda -pe4 — 

.yrUtri tint- 42( C4Asi 4!As 

CoLger

1

)- te. et,:tife _ -..ev et:e

•

oe., 6e' .ei'1°A*2-:

ale 107e,eLt-le••442! 2
•••:,41"

. • .... • •

&de 0,4 ,4,440-

zarAve.

/r•4-&.. plee,izre

a,„1,,e4.4074, 4ai

•

. • .

• • .... • ..• . • 7 •••• • :••-- • - ••••ft.r...p.•••••
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 of
Intelligent Systems Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; andb)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:   August 11, 2006

/s/ Bonnie L. HerronBonnie L. HerronChief Financial Officer
July 2021

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Helping People Help the Land 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Conservation Practice Overview

Sinkhole Treatment (Code 527) 

Sinkhole treatment is the management of naturally occuring

sinkholes to reduce contamination of groundwater and

surface water resources and reduce soil erosion through

the establishment of vegetative buffers, fencing, and control

of surface waters. Filtering the water entering the sinkhole

or plugging the sinkhole are also activities used in the

management of sinkholes. 

Practice Information 

This practice is applied on any land where the soils and geologic conditions have led to the

development of sinkholes. The primary purpose of sinkhole area treatment is to improve ground and

surface water quality, conserve soil and surface water resources, and/or improve farm safety. A

geologic investigation of the potential impacts of the treatment on groundwater, surface water, and the

karst features is required. 

This practice will include removing trash and other materials from the sinkhole, establishing vegetative

buffers, fencing the sinkhole and buffer area, developing nutrient and pest management plans for the

drainage area, and may include installing a filter or plug in the sinkhole when an open sinkhole poses

a safety hazard. 

Other considerations are the diversion of excess surface waters, use of appropriate erosion and

sedimentation control measures, and changes to the volume of surface water, which may disturb

underground hydrology. 

Common Associated Practices 

NRCS Conservation Practice Standard (CPS) Sinkhole Treatment (Code 527) is commonly applied

with other conservation practices such as NRCS CPSs Fence (Code 382), Use Exclusion (Code 472),

Diversion (Code 362), and Filter Strip (Code 393). 

For further information, contact your local NRCS field office.
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ Michael J. McCannMichael J. McCannChief Financial Officer
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-19-00309-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV-2019-02120

Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

AMY EDWARDS, Appellant

V.

CENTERPOINT APARTMENTS AND JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., 

Appellees
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered appellant’s request to dismiss the appeal. We grant the 

request and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: November 14, 2019
S. 1461 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen 

An Act 

To provide for the extension of the enforcement instruction on supervision requirements for outpatient therapeutic services in critical access and small rural hospitals through 2015. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ENFORCEMENT INSTRUCTION ON SUPERVISION REQUIREMENTS FOR OUTPATIENT THERAPEUTIC SERVICES IN CRITICAL ACCESS AND SMALL 

RURAL HOSPITALS THROUGH 2015. 

Section 1 of Public Law 113–198 is amended— 

(1) in the section heading, by inserting ‘‘AND 2015’’ after 

‘‘2014’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘calendar year 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘calendar 

years 2014 and 2015’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

14675 Lee Road

Chantilly, VA 20151-1715

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release #05-12

Contact: (703) 808-5050 April 3, 2012

NRO SATELLITE SUCCESSFULLY LAUNCHED ABOARD DELTA IV ROCKET

A National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) payload was successfully launched aboard a 

United Launch Alliance Delta IV rocket from Space Launch Complex-6, Vandenberg Air 

Force Base (VAFB), California, at 4:12 PST, on April 3, 2012.

This is the first of four scheduled launches in five months for the NRO this year, two at 

Vandenberg and two at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station. 

“Today’s successful launch is a tribute to the hard work and ingenuity of our government 

and contractor team and I am very proud of them. After the six successful launches last 

year, our 50th anniversary year, we proved tonight we can continue that hitting streak as

we work to deliver superior vigilance from above for the Nation,” remarked Col James D. 

Fisher, Director of Office of Space Launch. 

The NRO is a joint Department of Defense-Intelligence Community organization 

responsible for developing, launching, and operating America’s signals, imagery, and 

communications satellites to meet the needs of our nation. 

-NRO-
## Martin, Michael (OST) From: Martin, Michael (OST) 

### Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 12:15 PM To: wadavis@ogdensport.com; 'William D. Nelson (wnelson@ogdensburg.org)' 

### Cc: Andrew Bonney; Boutique Air, Shawn Simpson; Harvey, Caitlin (OST); Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) 

### Subject: Essential Air Service at Ogdensburg 

### Attachments: Boutique Air OGS EAS bid.pdf; Cape Air EAS proposal for Ogdensburg v12NOV14.pdf Everyone: Iwould like to update you on the Essential AirService (EAS) situation at Ogdensburg and give you an opportunityto offer any comments on the record beforewe submit a recommendation to the Deputy Assistant SecretaryforAviation and International Affairs. We issued Order2014-10-5 on October 9, 2014, requesting proposals from airlines interested in providing EAS for a newterm. In response to our request, Cape Air (the incumbent) and Boutique Air submitted proposals. I have attached each airline's bid foryour review and Iexpect itto be uploaded on www.regulations.gov sometime this afternoon. I request thatyou review each proposal carefully and submit any commentsyou may have as soon as possible, but no laterthan Friday, December 12. Please send your comments directlyto me via e-mail at michael.f.martin@dot.gov. Also, please forward this e-mail to all relevant parties that I have not included on the distribution list. Ifyou have any questions, feel free to contact me. Regards,
Michael Martin United States Department ofTransportation Essential Air Service (EAS) and Small CommunityAir Service Development Program (SCASDP) {202) 366-6494

1**~,,_**...,)

: ...) ···:··,. ,.
National Reconnaissance Office Release

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release #01-17

Contact: (703) 808-5050 March 3, 2017

NROL-79 Lifts Off on March 1, 2017

A National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) payload was successfully launched 

aboard a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket from Space Launch Complex-3, 

Vandenberg Air Force Base (VAFB), California, at 9:50 a.m. PST, March 1.

“I congratulate everyone who made this morning’s launch a success. Without the 

dedicated commitment from our government and industry teams, working 

together as one, it would not have been possible. All their hard work has 

contributed to providing superior vigilance from above for the Nation,” said 

Colonel Matthew Skeen, USAF, Director, NRO Office of Space Launch.

NROL-79 is the first of five 2017 NRO launches. The next NRO launch is on 

schedule for April, from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS), Florida.

-NROThe NRO is a joint Department of Defense–Intelligence Community organization responsible for 

developing, launching, and operating America’s intelligence satellites to meet the national 

security needs of our nation.
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the VAT and Duties Tribunals, Manchester Tribunal Centre, by direction of that court dated 24 November 2004, in the case of Dollond and Aitchison Ltd against Commissioners of Customs and Excise.

(Case C-491/04)

(2005/C 45/27)

Language of procedure: English

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by a direction of the VAT and Duties Tribunals, Manchester Tribunal Centre dated 24 November 2004, which was received at the Court Registry on 29 November 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Dollond and Aitchison Ltd and Commissioners of Customs and Excise, on the following questions:

----

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, OJ L 302, 19.10.1992, p. 1

(2)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, OJ L 145, 13.06.1977, p. 1

----
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ENRIQUEZ TRANSPORTATION, INC.

, JED TRANSPORATION, INC., SERGIO

ENRIQUEZ, JULIANNA RICO, AND

DAISY SANCHEZ

,

Appellant s

,

v.

ERAZMO MORALES SALAZAR

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 0009 0

- CV

Appeal from the

120 th District Court

of El Paso County , Texas

(TC# 2009

- 1679 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether the appeal should

be dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellant s ha ve not filed a brief or a motion

for extension of time to file a brief, we dismiss the appeal

.

This Court possesses the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when the

Appellant has failed to file his brief in the time prescribed, and gives no reasonable explanation for

such failure. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a)(1) ; Elizondo v. City of San Antonio , 975 S.W.2d 61, 63

(Tex.App.

-- San Antonio 1998, no writ).

On June 20, 2013, the Clerk of the Court notified Appellant s that their brief was past due

and no motion for extension of time to file a brief had been received. The Clerk also informed the2

parties of the Court’s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days of

the notice, a party responded sho wing grounds to continue the appeal. No response has been

received as of this date. We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b)

.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

July 24, 2013

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.