alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Earnest Tayl or and Lisa Taylor d/b/a T&S Enterprises v. Alfred Cantu, Lynn A. Cantu, Vela Ranch, L.L.C.

, and Brazoria C o unty

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 9

- 00 353

- CV

Trial court case number: 81916

- CV

Trial court: 23 rd District C o u rt of B razoria County

Appell ants Earnest Tayl or and Lisa Taylor d/b/a T&S Enterprises have filed a

“ Motion to Substitute Counsel ” requesting that Ste phen Casey be substitu ted as appel l ants ’ counsel

. T he motion is granted

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.5(b), (d)

.
The Clerk of this Court is directed to substitute Stephen Casey as counsel for appell ants on the docket of this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _____ /s/ Veronica Rivas

- Molloy

_______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

D ate: ___ December 2, 2021

____
99-1247.

#### Jury v. Ridenour.

Richland App. No. 98CA100. On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.

Cook, J., dissents.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1442 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1442

To amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to strike a provision relating 
   to the budget neutrality of any renegotiated Standard Reinsurance 
                               Agreement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2015

 Mr. Flake (for himself and Mr. Booker) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Crop Insurance Act to strike a provision relating 
   to the budget neutrality of any renegotiated Standard Reinsurance 
                               Agreement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Exclusion for Deficit Reduction in 
Agricultural Subsidies Elimination Act'' or the ``ERASE Act''.

SEC. 2. RENEGOTIATION OF STANDARD REINSURANCE AGREEMENT.

    Section 508(k)(8) of the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 
1508(k)(8)) is amended by striking subparagraph (F).
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-10214

Conference Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Christian Mondragon-Torres, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:17-CR-608-2

Before Jones, Clement, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Christian 

Mondragon-Torres has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mondragon-Torres has not filed a 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 5, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-10214 Document: 00515807530 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/05/2021
No. 20-10214

2

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the 

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, 

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5th Cir. R. 42. 

Case: 20-10214 Document: 00515807530 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/05/2021
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 10496)    
                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of Nursing Research Special Emphasis Panel, March 18, 2015, 3:00 p.m. to March 18, 2015, 4:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 18, 2015, 80 FR 8676.                

The meeting notice is amended to change the date of the meeting from March 18, 2015, 2:00 p.m. to March 12, 2015, 3:00 p.m. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: February 20, 2015.

Michelle Trout, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-03935 Filed 2-25-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT 23.1

# Consent of Independent
Auditors

The Board of DirectorsCNET
Networks, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by
reference in the registration statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-105563, 333-85374,
333-65224, 333-58724, 333-35458, 333-78247, 333-67325, 333-34491, 333-07671, and
333-07667) of CNET Networks, Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated January 26, 2004,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of CNET Networks, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2003, and the related financial statement schedule, which reports
appear in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of CNET Networks, Inc. and
subsidiaries. Our reports contain an explanatory paragraph that refers to the
Companys adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, on January 1, 2002.

San Francisco, CaliforniaFebruary
27, 2004
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1561 

To clarify the definition of nonadmitted insurer under the Nonadmitted and 

Reinsurance Reform Act of 2010, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 11, 2015 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself and Mr. GRAHAM) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To clarify the definition of nonadmitted insurer under the 

Nonadmitted and Reinsurance Reform Act of 2010, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Captive Insurers Clari5 fication Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CAPTIVE INSURERS. 

7 Section 527 of the Nonadmitted and Reinsurance Re8 form Act of 2010 (15 U.S.C. 8206) is amended— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1561 IS

1 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (4) through 

2 (16) as paragraphs (5) through (17), respectively; 

3 (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(4) CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY.—The 

6 term ‘captive insurance company’ includes any insur7 ance company— 

8 ‘‘(A) that is wholly owned, directly or indi9 rectly, by a single parent company, and whose 

10 primary purpose is to provide insurance to 

11 cover the risks of such single parent company 

12 or any affiliates of such single parent company; 

13 ‘‘(B) that is wholly owned, directly or indi14 rectly, by a group of companies, and whose pri15 mary purpose is to provide insurance to cover 

16 the risks of such group of companies or any af17 filiates of such group of companies; and 

18 ‘‘(C) that is wholly owned, directly or indi19 rectly, by an industry, trade, or service group or 

20 association, and whose primary purpose is to 

21 provide insurance to cover the risks to any 

22 member in such group or association or any af23 filiate of such member.’’; and 

24 (3) in paragraph (12)(B), as so redesignated— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1561 IS

1 (A) by striking ‘‘(B) does not include a 

2 risk retention group’’ and inserting the fol3 lowing: 

4 ‘‘(B) does not include— 

5 ‘‘(i) a risk retention group’’; 

6 (B) by striking the period at the end and 

7 inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

8 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(ii) a captive insurance company.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Special Projects Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, March 5, 2015.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kim Vinci at 1-888-912-1227 or 916-974-5086.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Special Projects Committee will be held Thursday, March 5, 2015, at 2 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Kim Vinci. For more information please contact: Kim Vinci at 1-888-912-1227 or 916-974-5086, TAP                           ( print page 8948)                        Office, 4330 Watt Ave, Sacramento, CA 95821, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include a discussion on various special topics with IRS processes.

February 12, 2015.

Otis Simpson,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2015-03474 Filed 2-17-15; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 23.1








Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








The Board of Directors


Carver Bancorp, Inc.:





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement No. 333-152698 on Form S-8 of Carver Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) of our report dated June 30, 2011 relating to the consolidated statements of condition of Carver Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2011, which report appears in the March 31, 2011 annual report on Form 10-K of Carver Bancorp, Inc.











New York, New York


June  30, 2011
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

C.H., *

parent of I.H., a minor, *

* No. 18

- 1920 V

Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v. * Filed: November 3, 2021

* Reissued: December 8 , 2021

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Stipulation; Hepatitis B vaccine;

* inactivated polio (“IPV”); idiopathic

* thrombocytopenic purpura (“ITP”).

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Ronald C. Homer , Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA , for Petitioner;

Ronalda E. Kosh

, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION 1

On November 3, 2021 , the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the

petition for compensation filed by C.H. on December 14, 2018. In her petition,

petitioner alleged that the hepatitis B and inactivated polio (“IPV”) vaccines,

which are contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C .F.R. §

100.3(a), and which I.H. received on March 6, 2017, caused I.H. to suffer

idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (“ITP”) . P etitioner further alleges that I.H.

suffered the residual effects of this injury for more than six mo nths. Petitioner

rep resents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for

damages on behalf of I.H. as a result of his condition.

Respondent denies that the vaccines caused I.H. to suffer from ITP or any other injury

.

1 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), C.H. filed a motion to redact her name from the

decision. This motion was granted and the decision is being otherwise released to the public.2

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The

undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the

Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Da mages awarded in that stipulation include:

a. A lump sum payment of $7,632.84 , which amount represents

reimbursement of a lien for services rendered on behalf of I.H. by

Wellcare, a Medicaid plan, in the form of a check payable jointly to

petitioner and Equian, and mailed to:

Equian

P.O. Box 182643

Columbus, OH 43218

Tax ID #: 27

- 0083277

Equian Event Number: 45764645

Legacy Case Number: 995746

Attn: Michael Zyrowski

b. An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in

paragr aph 10 of the stipulation, paid to the life insurance company

from which the annuity will be purchased (the “Life Insurance

Company”).

These amounts represent all other damages that would be available

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(a)

.

In the absence of a m otion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B,

the clerk is directed to enter judgment according to this decision and the attached

stipulation. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED

.

s /Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each

party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal

Claims judge.3 Special Master
#### The State ex rel. Parker, Appellant, *v.*Tate, Warden, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Parker v. Tate*(1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 625.]

(No. 99-786

Submitted August 25, 1999

Decided September 29, 1999.)

*626
      *Timothy Parker, pro se.*

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Diane D. Mallory,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

*Per Curiam.*

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Parker failed to allege sufficient facts supporting his claims to withstand dismissal. See *State ex rel. Jackson v. McFaul*(1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 185, 188, 652 N.E.2d 746, 748-749; *State ex rel. Carrion v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.*(1998), 80 Ohio St.3d 637, 638, 687 N.E.2d 759, 760. Parker instead relied on conclusory allegations that his “defense was hurt by the many delays” and that his acquittal “removed all factual support” for his revocation. *Jackson*and *Carrion.*In fact, the attachments to Parker’s own petition establish that one of his charged parole violations was his failure to notify his parole officer of his arrest on the new criminal charges. Consequently, it is evident that acquittal on those charges did not remove all factual support for his parole revocation.1

*Judgment affirmed.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

. Although the *court*of appeals erred in relying in part *on*materials attached to appellee’s dismissal motion in making its determination, *State ex rel. Freeman v. Morris*(1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 107, 109, 579 N.E.2d 702, 703, this error does not warrant reversal. See *Johnson v. Ohio Parole Bd.*(1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 140. 141. 684 N.E.2d 1227, 1227-1228.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Winthrop
Partners 81 Limited Partnership and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      491,000
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  0
<PP&E>                                    2,435,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (870,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            2,056,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             0
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                2,020,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              2,056,000
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             78,000
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                13,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              58,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          58,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                 58,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  2.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  2.11
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PLAINS
RESOURCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF
MARCH 31, 1997, AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,114
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   84,714
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,210
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,982
<PP&E>                                         506,456
<DEPRECIATION>                                 163,087
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 459,576
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           99,952
<BONDS>                                        256,714
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,654
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      97,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   459,576
<SALES>                                        207,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               207,132
<CGS>                                          188,523
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  193,843
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,710
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,484
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,593
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,891
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,891
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30686

Summary Calendar

 

EDWARD GIOVANNI,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DARYL VANNOY, Colonel; JACK HAMMONTREE, Lieutenant;

JOE HALEY, Captain; JEFFREY HEWES, Captain;

TROY PORET, Sergeant; MICHAEL ZIMMERMAN, Sergeant,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 93-CV-69-B-M2

- - - - - - - - - -

August 28, 1997

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Edward Giovanni, #96746, appeals the district court’s grant

of the defendants’ supplemental motion for summary judgment and 

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit. He contends that genuine

issues of material fact remain with respect to his claims

regarding the body cavity search conducted on November 8, 1992,

and a disciplinary report, which he asserts was “fabricated” in
No. 96-30686

- 2 -

retaliation for his exercising his First Amendment right to seek

access to the courts. We have reviewed the record and briefs and

AFFIRM the district judge’s dismissal for essentially the same

reasons adopted by the district judge. Giovanni v. Vannoy Et

Al., No. 93-69-B-M2 (M.D. La. Feb. 28, 1996). 

 AFFIRMED.