alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1400 

To amend the Small Business Act to direct the task force of the Office 

of Veterans Business Development to provide access to and manage 

the distribution of excess or surplus property to veteran-owned small 

businesses. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 20, 2015 

Mr. DURBIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to direct the task force 

of the Office of Veterans Business Development to provide access to and manage the distribution of excess 

or surplus property to veteran-owned small businesses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Small Busi5 ness Enhancement Act of 2015’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1400 IS

1 SEC. 2. ACCESS TO EXCESS OR SURPLUS PROPERTY FOR 

2 VETERAN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESSES. 

3 Section 32(c)(3)(B) of the Small Business Act (15 

4 U.S.C. 657b(c)(3)(B)) is amended— 

5 (1) in clause (v), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and insert6 ing a semicolon; 

7 (2) in clause (vi), by striking the period at the 

8 end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

9 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

10 clause: 

11 ‘‘(vii) providing access to and man12 aging the distribution of excess or surplus 

13 property owned by the United States to 

14 small business concerns owned and con15 trolled by veterans, pursuant to a memo16 randum of understanding between the task 

17 force and the head of the applicable state 

18 agency (as defined in section 549 of title 

19 40, United States Code).’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
AFS

- 13

- 244

- E March 22, 2013

Exemption No. 7897F

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2002

- 12728

Mr. Douglas Carr

Vice President

National Business Aviation Association, Inc.

1200 18 th Street, NW, Sui te 400

Washington, DC 20036

Dear Mr. Carr :

This letter is to inform you that we have extend ed Exemption No. 7897 , as amended. It

explains the basis for our decision , describes its effect, and lists the conditions and limitations.

The Basis for Our Dec ision

On September 27, 2012, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued Exemption

No. 7897, as amended to National Business Aviation Association, Inc. ( NBAA )

. That

e xemption from §§ 91.409(e) and 91.501(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations ( 14

CFR) allows NBAA to operate small civil airplanes and helicopters of United States registry

under the operation rules of §§ 91.503 through 91.535 and to select an inspection program as

described in § 91.409(f).

Our Decision

The FAA has determined tha t the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 7897 , as

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore,

under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator

has deleg at ed to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.2

Conditions and Limitations

1. Only those operations that are listed in § 91.501(b)(1) through (7) and (9) may be

conducted under the authority of this exemption. Tho se operations must be

conducted in compliance with the operating rules in §§ 91.503 through 91.535.

However, helicopter operations are not required to comply with the flight altitude

rules of § 91.515(a), provided the operations comply with the minimum sa fe

altitude requirements in § 91.119. Aircraft operated under the authority of this

exemption must use an inspection program listed in § 91.409(f).

2. No person may operate an aircraft under this exemption unless the appropriate

Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) has been

-

a. Notified that the operation will be conducted under the terms of this

exemption; and

b. Provided with a copy of the time

- sharing, interchange, or joint ownership

agreement under which each aircraft is being operated, if appr opriate. Each

agreement must include the aircraft registration number of each aircraft

involved.

3. No person may operate an aircraft under this exemption unless an entry is made in

the aircraft logbook showing the provisions of part 91, subpart F, under which it is

being operated.

4. No person may operate an aircraft under the authority of this exemption unless an

inspection program has been submitted to and approved by the appropriate FSDO.3

5. This exemption does not authorize the conduct of any operati on required to be

conducted under the rules of part 135.

6. This exemption is not valid for operations outside of the United States.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 7897, as amended, to

March 31, 2 015

, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John M. Allen

Director, Flight Standards Service
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

# Past Exhibits Photo Gallery

HomeHistoryNational Cryptologic MuseumExhibits & ArtifactsCryptologic MuseumPast Exhibits

Search

Search

                              - All Images 
                              - Design Elements 
                              - NSA Historical Photographs 
                              - Other 

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (0.79 MB)

Tags:past-exhibits

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v. JAIME BRAVO GUERRERO , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 23

- 02 57 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2015

- 1432 36

- 001 The Honorable Jeffrey A. Rueter , Judge
REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

APPEARANCES Maricopa County Attorney ’ s Office , Phoenix By Phil ip D. Garrow Counsel for Respondent
Jaime Bravo Guerrero , Kingman Petitioner FILED 01-04-2024STATE v. GUERRERO Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge D. Steven Williams, Judge Samuel A. Thumma, and Judge Paul J. McMurdie delivered the C ourt’s decision.

PER CURIUM : ¶1 Petitioner Jaime Bravo Guerrero seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief , filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. 1 This is petitioner’s latest successive petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v . Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102 , 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. The petitioner h as failed to show an abuse of discretion. ¶4 For the foregoing reasons, this court grants review but denies relief.

1 On December 8, 2023, Petitioner notice d this court of his pending petition for review before the Arizona Supreme Court

.
Opinion issued August 2, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-12-00071-CV

DORIS COLLEN WILLETTS, Appellant

V.

MORRISON O. WILLETTS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 245th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-75588

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Doris Collen Willetts, has failed to timely file a brief. See TEX.R.

APP. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant 
2

to file brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, 

appellant did not respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary 

dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief. 

We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Brown.
EXHIBIT 21.1


           DIRECT AND INDIRECT SUBSIDIARIES OF AVAX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTE:    All of the entities listed below are wholly owned direct or indirect
         subsidiaries of AVAX Technologies, Inc., except as noted.

UNITED STATES INCORPORATION (DELAWARE)

AVAX International IP Holdings, Inc.

AVAX International Holdings, Inc.

AVAX International Services, Inc.

AVAX America, Inc.

DENMARK OFFSHORE HOLDING COMPANY

AVAX Technologies Holdings ApS

FRENCH ENTITIES

GPH, S.A.

Genopoietic, S.A.

AUSTRALIAN ENTITIES

AVAX Australia Holdings Pty Limited

AVAX Australia Pty Limited (1)

AVAX Australia Manufacturing Pty Limited (1)

---------------
(1)      At December 31, 2002, AVAX Holings Pty Limited held a 95% interest in
         both AVAX Australia Pty Limited and AVAX Australia Manufacturing Pty
         Limited.
Order entered September 18, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00624-CV

MELISSA BREWER, Appellant

V.

COMPASS BANK, Appellee

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-02438-2019

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s September 17, 2020 motion for an extension 

of time to file her brief on the merits. In her motion, appellant explains that she is 

trying to obtain counsel to assist her with this appeal. She requests a sixty-day 

extension. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to November 16, 2020.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
#### United States National Bank, Appellant, vs. Lake Superior Terminal & Transfer Railway Company, Respondent.

*April 14*

May *4, 1915.*

*Taxation: Special assessment certificates: Limitation of actions.*

An action brought under sec. 1210Z, Stats. 1913, by the owner of special assessment certificates to recover the aggregate amount of two special assessments for street paving is an action on the certificates, and .when brought after six years from their date is barred under the terms of sec. 1183.

*670Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Douglas county: Byeon B. Paek, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

This is an action to recover the aggregate amount of two special assessments for street paving made against two parcels of real estate of the defendant company in the city of Superior. The plaintiff is the owner of the special assessment certificates by virtue of assignments from the contractor to whom they were issued. The action is brought under the provisions of sec. 12101, Stats. 1913, which provides in substance that municipal corporations may collect special assessments of this nature by action in the name of the corporation, and that the owner or holder of the certificate may maintain a like action, in which latter action it shall be sufficient to set up a copy of the certificate, specify the amount due and when payable, and allege that the defendant is liable therefor.

The certificates in the present case were signed and dated September 25, 1907, and this action was commenced December 6, 1913. Sec. 1183, Stats. 1913 (which has existed in the same form since a date, prior to the Revised Statutes of 1878), provides that no action, either at law or in equity, shall be maintained on such a certificate after six years from its date. This statute was pleaded as a defense and the trial court held that it was a bar to the action, and the plaintiff appeals. ■

Eor the appellant there was a brief by Ch'ace, *Hudnall & Fridley*and *T. L.*McIntosh, and oral argument by *Geo. B. Hudnall.*

Eor the respondent there was a,brief by *J. A. Murphy,*attorney, and *Sanborn & Biahe,*of counsel, and oral argument by *John B. Sanborn.*

Winslow, O. J.

In this case it is held that the action is an action on, the special assessment certificates, and hence is barred under the terms of sec. 1183, Stats., because brought after six years from the date of the certificates.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       1,478,024
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,475,775
<ALLOWANCES>                                    33,800
<INVENTORY>                                    644,576
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,805,993
<PP&E>                                       1,476,383
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,011,283
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,290,291
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          716,138
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        42,263
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,290,291
<SALES>                                      7,839,898
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,839,898
<CGS>                                        2,626,238
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,626,238
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,523,125
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             109,730
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                690,535
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   680,535
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of AVAX Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard P. Rainey, President (as such, the principal executive officer and
principal accounting officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Richard P. Rainey
---------------------------------
Richard P. Rainey
President
(Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer)
April 14, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           9
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         28,877
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          1,994
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                6,300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   276,988
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                0
<LOANS>                                       639,618
<ALLOWANCE>                                     8,186
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,010,316
<DEPOSITS>                                    793,352
<SHORT-TERM>                                    1,793
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             7,917
<LONG-TERM>                                   116,842
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       23,116
<OTHER-SE>                                     67,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              1,010,316
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                26,606
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               8,765
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  562
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               35,933
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             16,066
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             19,673
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          16,260
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   1,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (55)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                14,358
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 6,165
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      6,165
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    4,331
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.45
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.70
<LOANS-NON>                                     1,526
<LOANS-PAST>                                    1,133
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 1,010
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                7,629
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   1,303
<RECOVERIES>                                      360
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               8,186
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            8,186
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 23


                                                                                
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                                        
As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated January 22, 1999, included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8, File Nos. 33-80436, 33-
94268, 33-94284, 333-65523, 333-36439.


 

                                        /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
                                        ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
February 22 , 1999
1111

8. slur

Lt Colonel, USAF

Chief, Satellite Systems

•

SALIASSIO MUM OMNI

STATNI AIR !ORM

Los Angeles 4r Ciditornfa

PINY TO

Anti OR

TOM I

Lazzame.i. E. H. Bragii•anavi,

DISCOMIR IX Launching

5 lrebr► ezy 1960

LBG

Set forth below is a suggested item for the AMC Diary describing

the results of the launching of MOOTS=

DISCOYMBRS lives launched at 1051 hrs,.4 February 1960 but failed

to achieve orbit. Ramat cause or causes of orbital failure are unknown;

however, the following irregularities in launch operation are presumed

to be the cause of non.orbit.

Failure of udbilical mast to retract during lift-off caused

the helium quick disconnect to be tore Iron thWAORIA vehicle resulting

in loss of pressure in AGM propellant pressurisation spheres.

THOR booster main engine cut4off occurred at apprcodamtely145

secs:ale, which would be approximately SO seconds earlier than the uminal.

burning time resulting in a range of only . 48namtioal miles vs a nominal

of 85 nautical. miles and an altitude of 33 ststall miles-vs a nominal of

VT stet* miles.

-1.10

AGM separation was apparmaayncenal l hoviver, preliminaty

data available indicates that the vehicle was unstable during ignition

buicing. AWE& burning lasted only 17 seconds during which time the -

vehicle continued to be unstable with final tuMbling being the suspected

cause of the engine shut down because of the•lack of propellant.

Failure of the telemetry ship to establish contact maths.

acquisition frequencies coupled with the initial calculations that

maxim* velocity attainad, was may 9000 feet per seem* it is presumed

that orbit was not achieved.

3. All telemetry necords are being flown to USD for reduction sad

analysis for more definitive causes of failure to orbit. -

. DISCOMMEIBlaundh is not scheduled before 18 February 1960. .

DOWN(.1"A rT0 AT !? YEAR

INTE". VA. N.. t t , C., A KAItr

DECLAS6ir•E.u. WO Die, 540.10

11111.1t°LW-33
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.06




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-4 of Building One Services Corporation our report dated
January 30, 1998, relating to the financial statements of Wilson Electric
Company, Inc., which appears in Building One Services Corporation's Prospectus
Supplement dated May 17, 1999. We also consent to the reference to us under the
heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.



                                              /s/ Barry & Moore, P.C.
                                              ----------------------------------




June 25, 1999