alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 8(a)

                                  Subsidiaries

A.   ASE Test, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of
     China;

B.   ASE Test Holdings Ltd, a corporation organized under the laws of the Cayman
     Islands, and wholly-owned subsidiary, ISE Labs, Inc., a corporation
     organized under the laws of the State of California, U.S.A. ISE Labs, Inc.
     has four subsidiaries:

     (i)  ISE Labs Hong Kong Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of
          Hong Kong S.A.R.;

     (ii) ASE Technology Pte Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of
          Singapore;

     (iii)ISE Technology, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the
          State of California, U.S.A.; and

     (iv) Digital Testing Services Inc., a corporation organized under the laws
          of the State of California, U.S.A.

C.   ASE Test Finance Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of
     Mauritius.

D.   ASE Holding (Singapore) PTE Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of
     Singapore, and its wholly owned subsidiary, ASE Electronics (M) Sdn. Bhd,
     Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of Malaysia.
# C_2005115EN.01000801.xml

| 14.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/8

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 10 March 2005

in Case C-240/04: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directives 2002/19/EC, 2002/20/EC, 2002/21/EC and 2002/22/EC - Electronic communications networks and services - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2005/C 115/16)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-240/04 Commission of the European Communities (Agent: M. Shotter) v Kingdom of Belgium (Agent: E. Dominkovits) — Action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 8 June 2004 — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, J. Makarczyk and P. Kūris (Rapporteur), Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 10 March 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directives 2002/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities (Access Directive), 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive), 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive), and 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive), the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under those directives. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directives 2002/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities (Access Directive), 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive), 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive), and 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive), the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under those directives.

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 24.07.2004.

1

---
NRO Statement on Small Satellites

1 July 1996

The Intelligence Community, including the National Reconnaissance Office, was a key 

participant in the Hermann Panel on small satellites at the request of Director of Central 

Intelligence John Deutch. The report was delivered to the DCI and the Senate and House 

intelligence committees in June. The DCI and Acting NRO Director Keith Hall have 

responded to the report in classified testimony.

The DCI and the NRO fully support the concept that "smaller is better," and the NRO is moving 

toward a smaller class of satellites. We realize the advantages offered by these systems: 

increased flexibility, potential lower overall costs, improved technology and insertion, and 

potential for launch on-demand. The question facing the Intelligence Community and the NRO is 

not whether to move toward smaller satellites but, rather, how small our satellites should be. Of 

equal concern is how to transition from current systems to smaller ones without effecting our 

ability to provide uninterrupted, superior support to national policymakers and operational 

customers.

The Acting DNRO has initiated a study to provide the DCI and SecDef with options for the 

follow-on architecture. The study team includes representatives from Central Intelligence 

Agency, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Central Imagery Office, and Defense Airborne Reconnaissance 

Office who will compare cost, schedule, and performance parameters for varying system 

configurations against a common set of requirements. The report is due in August of this year. 

With this report and the Hermann small satellite report, the DCI and SecDef will be equipped to 

make the necessary recommendations to the President and Congress as to what the nation's 

satellite-reconnaissance architecture should be in the next century.
Astronautics Award Lauds NRO Leadership

11 June 1999 

Keith Hall, Director, National Reconnaissance Office and Assistant Secretary of the Air Force 

for Space, was honored recently as recipient of the American Astronautical Society's Military 

Astronautics Award. Hall was credited for his "visionary leadership in creating a new synthesis 

of Air Force and National Reconnaissance Office Space operations."
z..

i..

WDOWarig Gin Terhunsi2221

Discoverer Re-Entry filedies

Asi 54

•

4 .

WDZ (Col Curtin)

At the thus of writing this sturaso, the undersigaed and *Colonel Evans,

together with Colonel Cody and Lockheed, Laid jut reviewed the results

of the Discoverer 5 launch. We lave mutually agreed upon actions

taken to date, which we bape will provide with a successful Discoverer 6

flight. hi addition to thus actions, I feel one additional study is required.

This study would be a detailed review of all conditions affecting re-entry

and would be similar to the close look we (the undersigned and Col Dodge)

took at the GE capsule and nose cone recovery program early this year--

prier to the time we began to successfully recover nose cones. In view

• of the large number of flight* scheduled for the Discoverer series, I

feel this typo of background is necessary to provost possible additional

trouble in this arm.

C•NT
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release # 11-13

Contact: (703) 808-5050 Oct. 15, 2012

Jill Singer, NRO Chief Information Officer, Receives Prestigious CIO 

Breakaway Leader Award

On September 10, Ms. Jill Singer, NRO Chief Information Officer (CIO), received the Global CIO 

Community’s prestigious 2012 Breakaway Leaders Award. Ms. Singer was one of 10 CIOs from 

across industry and government receiving accolades at this year’s Global CIO Executive Summit 

held in Aspen, Colorado. 

The Top 10 Breakaway Leaders Awards recognize high-performing CIOs who are revolutionizing 

their company’s competitive position in the evolving economy through visionary leadership and 

business transformation. The winners of the Top 10 Breakaway Leaders Awards are determined 

by combined input of an independent panel of judges and a peer-based voting process.

“Jill is not only an integral member of our leadership team, but more importantly, she has been 

the champion of our effort to transform our Information Technology enterprise,” said Director of 

the National Reconnaissance Office Betty Sapp. “Jill’s passion and dedication to improving our 

IT enterprise have been key to the significant advances that have been made at the NRO. She 

has used her understanding of our mission and her experience in the IT community to help the 

NRO see and achieve improvements that others didn’t think possible.”

Ms. Singer was appointed the NRO CIO in January 2010. Prior to joining the NRO, Ms. Singer 

served as the Deputy CIO for the Central Intelligence Agency. She has served in several senior 

leadership positions within the Federal Government including Director of the Diplomatic 

Telecommunications Service, U.S. Department of State and Chief of Systems Engineering, 

Architecture, and Planning for CIA’s global infrastructure organization. She has held industry 

positions with Science Applications International Corporation, Inc. (SAIC), GE Aerospace, and 

IBM. She received her master’s degree in Systems Analysis and bachelor’s degree in Computer 

Science from the University of West Florida. She is a graduate of several leadership programs 

including the Federal Executive Leadership Program and the University of Virginia’s (UVA) 

Executive Leaders Program. 

Ms. Singer’s other awards include the Top Ten Women in Cloud (2012); Ten Most Powerful 

Women in Federal Technology (2011); CIA Mentor of the Year (2010); CIO Executive Council 

“Ones to Watch” (2010); and CIO Magazine Stand-Out Award for Collaboration and Influence 

(2010).

-NRO-
a oo Statement of Work (Study of Guidance Facilities)

wre . wr | 26 Sept 56 Goonel Riepe/Ah/13h),
‘Atta: Colonel Hastings . a : wr

ge There are no arguments tions or deletions we would, propose to your
Statenamt of Work, "Study of Ouidance Pootsndcse® . i
So og daring tos elit HAD % woe the W107 (eee nose cone) wsthort sont-
- Sesto eurtng we we Teittanil real S'griy oettlnbinys Cat
'. Otee on Same as
exception of tie geographical orientations .

. . . Pests ed
3- In addsts an descnsegt7ates MLL have a recitrenent for detection :
tracking stations ses
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Kim Korth, certify that:

 

1.                                       I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Supreme Industries, Inc.; and

 

2.                                       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 
| Date:   March 26, 2012 | /s/   Kim Korth           |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------|
|                        | Kim   Korth               |
|                        | Chief   Executive Officer |

 

----
# C_2005069EN.01002801.xml

| 19.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/28

---

(2005/C 69/48)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the
  Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 57, 5.3.2005

OJ C 57, 5.3.2005

Past publications

OJ C 45, 19.2.2005

OJ C 31, 5.2.2005

OJ C 19, 22.1.2005

OJ C 6, 8.1.2005

OJ C 314, 18.12.2004

OJ C 300, 4.12.2004

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

| | CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex |
| --- | --- |

CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex

---
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1319 

To validate final patent number 27–2005–0081, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 13, 2015 

Mr. HELLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To validate final patent number 27–2005–0081, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINAL PATENT AND LAND RECONFIGURATION 

4 IN CLARK COUNTY AND LINCOLN COUNTY, 

5 NEVADA. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Patent number 27–2005–0081 

7 and the associated land reconfiguration issued by the Bu8 reau of Land Management on February 18, 2005, as de9 picted on the map prepared by the Bureau of Land Man10 agement entitled ‘‘Lincoln County Land Patent’’ and 

11 dated December 4, 2014, is affirmed and validated as havVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:51 May 16, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1319.IS S1319

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1319 IS

1 ing been issued pursuant to, and in compliance with, the 

2 Nevada-Florida Land Exchange Authorization Act of 

3 1988 (Public Law 100–275; 102 Stat. 52), the National 

4 Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et 

5 seq.), and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 

6 of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) for the benefit of the 

7 desert tortoise, other species, and the habitat of the desert 

8 tortoise and other species to increase the likelihood of the 

9 recovery of the desert tortoise and other species. 

10 (b) ISSUANCE OF LINCOLN COUNTY PATENT.— 

11 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Director of the Bureau 

12 of Land Management may issue a patent for 7,548 

13 acres of land in Lincoln County, Nevada, that is— 

14 (A) depicted on the map described in sub15 section (a); and 

16 (B) described in the legal description of 

17 the proposed lease and fee land on file in the 

18 Ely District Office of the Bureau of Land Man19 agement. 

20 (2) APPLICABLE LAW.—A patent issued under 

21 paragraph (1) shall be considered to have been 

22 issued pursuant to, and in compliance with, the Ne23 vada-Florida Land Exchange Authorization Act of 

24 1988 (Public Law 100–275; 102 Stat. 52). 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1319 IS

1 (c) RATIFICATION OF RECONFIGURATION.—The 

2 process used by the United States Fish and Wildlife Serv3 ice and the Bureau of Land Management in reconfiguring 

4 the land described in subsection (a), as depicted on Ex5 hibit 1–4 of the Final Environmental Impact Statement 

6 for the Planned Development Project MSHCP, Lincoln 

7 County, NV (FWS–R8–ES–2008–N0136) and the recon8 figuration provided for in Special Condition 10 of Army 

9 Corps of Engineers Permit No. 200125042 are ratified. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 911/2006

of 20 June 2006         

on import licences in respect of beef and veal products originating in Botswana, Kenya, Madagascar, Swaziland, Zimbabwe and Namibia

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2286/2002 of 10 December 2002 on the arrangements applicable to agricultural products and goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products originating in the African, Caribbean and Pacific States (ACP States) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1706/98 (2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2247/2003 of 19 December 2003 laying down detailed rules for the application in the beef and veal sector of Council Regulation (EC) No 2286/2002 on the arrangements applicable to agricultural products and certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products originating in the African, Caribbean and Pacific States (ACP States) (3), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The following Member States shall issue on 21 June 2006 import licences for beef and veal products, expressed as boned meat, originating in certain African, Caribbean and Pacific States, in respect of the following quantities and countries of origin:

Article 2

Licence applications may be submitted, pursuant to Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2247/2003, during the first 10 days of July 2006 for the following quantities of boned beef and veal:

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 June 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 June 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1899/2004 (OJ L 328, 30.10.2004, p. 67).

(2)OJ L 348, 21.12.2002, p. 5.

(3)OJ L 333, 20.12.2003, p. 37. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1118/2004 (OJ L 217, 17.6.2004, p. 10).

(4)OJ L 302, 31.12.1972, p. 28. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 807/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 36).

----
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1152/2006

of 27 July 2006         

fixing the maximum reduction in the duty on maize imported in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified from 21 to 27 July 2006, pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2006, the maximum reduction in the duty on maize imported shall be 30,75 EUR/t and be valid for a total maximum quantity of 169 089 t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 July 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 July 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 192, 13.7.2006, p. 10.

(3)OJ L 177, 28.7.1995, p. 4. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1558/2005 (OJ L 249, 24.9.2005, p. 6).

----
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY [015 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

WASHINGTON 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, MANNED ORBITING 

LABORATORY (MOL) PROGRAM 

SUBJECT: Authorization to Proceed with MOL Program 

As Director of the MOL Program, you are 

authorized to proceed immediately with the development 

of a Manned Orbiting Laboratory system. I approve 

the selection of Douglas Aircraft Company and General 

Electric Company as laboratory and mission module 

associate contractors, respectively, to participate in 

this endeavor. 

Copies to: 

Chief of Staff, U. S. Air Force 

Commander, AFSC
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 TOP SECRLT 

THE DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20301 

JUN 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE 

DIRECTOR, NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

The Air Force is hereby directed to terminate the MOL Program except 

for those camera system elements useful for incorporation into an unmanned satellite system optimized to use the TITAN III D. Directions 

to MOL contractors should be issued on Tuesday morning, June 10, at 

which time we will also notify the Congress and make a public statement 

that MOL is cancelled. 

Close-out costs for MOL, which I understand are approximately $75 

million more than is now available to the MOL Program, should be included in the unclassified FY 70 Air Force budget. An additional 

1111111should be included in classified NRP portion's of the FY 70 Air 

Force budget. This will provide for development of the camera system 

at a reduced pace, for competition for a new spacecraft, and for possible 

initiation of system development late in FY 70. 

All future work on the camera and an unmanned system will be part of 

the NRP. As a security measure, appropriate elements of the MOL 

Project Offices and the camera system contracts should be transferred 

to the Air Force NRP Special Projects Offices at an early date. Overt 

MOL activities should be phased out in conjunction with the closeout 

of MOL Program activities. 

A plan for development of the unmanned system should be submitted to 

the Executive Committee by August 1. This plan should include proposed 

system performance, cost, and schedules. Other than continuing the 

camera system development at a reduced rate, no new work should be 

initiated until this review. 

cc: Mr. Helms 

Dr. DuBridge 

E 7 8 1 5 8 ` 6 9 

DORIAN 

GROUP 1 

Excluded from automatic 

downgrading and declassfficetion --HP-SEC-RET------ 

RANDLE gym 

DIM MI 

Copy of •412.• 00,1•11
```

[Federal Register: July 13, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 133)]
[Notices]               
[Page 40019]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr13jy10-132]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7086]

 
In the Matter of the Review of the Designation of the Communist 
Party of the Philippines/New People's Army (aka CPP/NPA and Other 
Aliases) as a Foreign Terrorist Organization Pursuant to Section 219 of 
the Immigration and Nationality Act, as Amended

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this 
matter pursuant to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (``INA''), and in 
consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the 
Treasury, I conclude that the circumstances that were the basis for the 
2004 re-designation of the aforementioned organization as a foreign 
terrorist organization have not changed in such a manner as to warrant 
revocation of the designation and that the national security of the 
United States does not warrant a revocation of the designation.
    Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the 
aforementioned organization as a foreign terrorist organization, 
pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be 
maintained.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: June 30, 2010.
James B. Steinberg,
Deputy Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-17014 Filed 7-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```