alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Bureau of Industry and Security

The Materials Technical Advisory Committee will meet on March 5, 2015, 10:00 a.m., Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room 3884, 14th Street between Constitution & Pennsylvania Avenues NW., Washington, DC. The Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration with respect to technical questions that affect the level of export controls applicable to materials and related technology.

## Agenda

### Open Session

1. Opening Remarks and Introduction of Dr. Richard Duncan, Director Chemical and Biological Controls Division.

2. Remarks from BIS senior management.

3. Presentation on NSF Workshop on the Global Movement and Tracking of Chemical Manufacturing Equipment in May 2014 by Clara Zahradnik from DuPont.

4. Report from working groups: Public Domain issues, Composite Working Group, Biological Working Group, Pump and Valves Working Group.

5. Report on regime-based activities.

6. Public Comments and New Business.

                    The open session will be accessible via teleconference to 20 participants on a first come, first serve basis. To join the conference, submit inquiries to Ms. Yvette Springer at                     *Yvette.Springer@*      ( print page 8592)    *bis.doc.gov*                     no later than February 26, 2015.                

A limited number of seats will be available during the public session of the meeting. Reservations are not accepted. To the extent time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the Committee. The public may submit written statements at any time before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public presentation materials to Committee members, the Committee suggests that presenters forward the public presentation materials prior to the meeting to Ms. Springer via email.

For more information, call Yvette Springer at (202) 482-2813.

Dated: February 12, 2015.

Yvette Springer,

Committee Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-03325 Filed 2-17-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P
U.S. Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary ofTransportation 

## AUG 272.014 Mr. David Gensterblum President/CEO Aqua-Chem, Inc. 3001 E. Governor John SevierHighway Knoxville, TN 37914 Dear Mr. Gensterblum: Assistant Secretary 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington. DC 20590

Thank you for your letter, addressed to Secretary Foxx, supporting the proposal submittedby the Metropolitan Knoxville AirportAuthority for a grant underthe U.S. Department of Transportation's Small Community Air Service Development Program. Secretary Foxx asked that I respond to youonhis behalf. The Small Community Air Service Development Program was established to help smaller communities address air service deflciencies, particularlyissues related to high airfares and insufficient service. Under the statute, the Departmentmay make a maximum of40 grant awards each year, although no more than four may beto communities in the same State. To provide communities with latitude in developing solutions to their air service deficiencies, the statute provides flexibility in the types ofair service development projectsthat can be funded. On June 30, the Department issued an order setting a deadline ofJuly 31 for applications. As these grant requests are pending before the Department, 1cannot comment on the merits ofany particular proposal. I assure you, however, that the Department will give full and fair consideration to all proposals thathave been properly filed. As is our standard practice, 1amplacing a copy ofyour letter and this response in Docket DOT-OST-2014-0113 as a contact outside the record ofthis matter. I appreciate your interest in this program. Sincerely yours,

Susan 

### L. Kurland Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs

# • 

# •• Global. Water: Solutions.

August 19, 2014
David J. Gensterblum Aqua-Chem, Inc. 3001 E. GovernorJohn SevierHwy Knoxville, TN 37914

TheHonorable Anthony Foxx Secretary United States Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590 RE: Docket DOT-OST-2014-0113 Dear Secretary Foxx: I am writing you to encourage the Department's approval ofthe application ofthe Metropolitan Knoxville Airport Authority and the Competitive Airfare Partnership under the 2014 Small Community Air Service Development Grant program. The continuously increasing airline fares have been a burden on our business, specifically when tryingto bring meet with ourcustomers and vendors. Often, we have chosen to convene in other destinations, such as Atlanta or Chicago, to meet the needs ofour agendas. Ifthe grant is approved, Knoxville will be able to recruit and provide startup marketing suppottfor new low-fare airline service atour airport. \Ve believe in suppotting our community's economic growth and development and this could be another step in making that happen. I hope that the Departmentwill considerthis opportunity. It could tremendously help the entire East Tennessee region reduce the cost ofair travel on a variety oflevels by approving Knoxville's Small Community Air Service Development Grant application. Please feel free to contact me ifyou have any additional questions orconcerns.

Aqua-Chem, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------

USCIB: 4/68 

Eq;£:~~Q.,;Jl67491 .,.. ULG2lL2 e !~Uftl.T"! llllP'Oftl'VIATIOill 

9 July 1953 

24 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBER§ OF USCIBEC: 

Subject: Downgrading of Classification ot USCIB 

Directives Numbers l, 2, and 3. 

1. In accordance with the policy of USCIB which is to classify charts and descriptions of the organization of USCIB CONFIDENTIAL, and to classify the tact of collaboration with the U.K. 

-SECRET, it is recommended that USCIB Directives Numbers land 2 

be downgraded to CONFIDENTIAL and that USCIB Directive Number 3 

be downgraded to SECRET. 

2. Attention is invited to the heeding of paragraph 5c of 

USCIB Directive Number 3. Action is being initiated to obtain 

approval for downgrading to SECRET the fact of collaboration with 

the other countries concerned. Since specific mention of only 

the U.K. is made it would appear that the classification of USCIB 

Directive Number 3 need not be higher than SECRET. 

3. The recommendations contained in paragraphs 1 and 2, 

above, are being scheduled for consideration at the next regular 

meeting of USCIBEC, 17 July 1953. 

USCIB: 4/68 

......,...JA..,....OR 

aptain, u. . Navy 

utive Secretary, USCIB
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Lattice Incorporated (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joe
      Noto, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Lattice Incorporated and will be retained by Lattice Incorporated and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




Date: November
                19, 2007
            /s/
                Joe NotoName: 
                Joe NotoTitle: 
                Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF CORNELL COMPANIES, INC.
                            (AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               PERCENTAGE OF VOTING
                                                 PERCENTAGE OF VOTING          SECURITIES OWNED BY A
                                             SECURITIES OWNED BY CORNELL            SUBSIDIARY
                                                   COMPANIES, INC.           OF CORNELL COMPANIES, INC.
                                             ----------------------------   ----------------------------
<S>                                          <C>                            <C>
Cornell Corrections Management, Inc.                     100%
  Cornell Corrections of Texas, Inc.                                                   100%
  Cornell Corrections of California, Inc.                                              100%
  Cornell Corrections of Rhode Island, Inc.                                            100%
  Abraxas Group, Inc.                                                                  100%
  WBP Leasing, Inc.                                                                    100%
  Cornell Corrections of Oklahoma, Inc.                                                100%
  Cornell Corrections of Georgia, L.P.                                                 100%
  Cornell Corrections of Alaska, Inc.                                                  100%
  Cornell Interventions, Inc.                                                          100%
CCGI Corporation                                         100%
Cornell Companies Administration LLC                     100%
Cornell Companies Management Holdings LLC                100%
  Cornell Companies Management Services L.P.                                           100%
  Cornell Companies Management L.P.                                                    100%

</TABLE>
" • .••••••

. ,i• ••

• • •••

•

• ' • 1: :•

.Lt. Co one •: • • •.•

*".".. Executive - Assistant

.

(2111:8 111

.0%

LA. -

.

"

•

1 41:1,

„; ,t...;NT,;;;....4 tilit ;7.,if i.... k

• 1,:i 0 ,

Pt.. rr

.:;,.f...":11A;.''St.rl.i't?iil: . i .1 ... • • •

. ......./:.,..7..S.:•5. ..:..r,1 .*"..-;?• '.'ea. ,..11/:•*" ...-1';.:1:::, ,. -•...70"1 J:i• - ".1.. 1% .

Ai

..., ,

.

• .. ....7 . ..!...:::.."DipAnnur :,....• ..er

s

-..

d•

.v.7y..s.. cw..x.1.....ing .../. Aut ,•up44-poisca .:r:.” '-‘,.. .77.. 7 : 'rt.......".„........• ....1.*-,...4 .... . ,

Y

'.. ,...,: 

i1.1..,..'11.11 -. .;,

. • • • . .• .

. .. •• ' '

' • ' !• :.Y..."- .7--••• f.- :t.. k: . .. .

•-.

. • •• •'• .

•

. •

••

•

OPPICIROPTOIE Man

•

 iiimeaTMet

•

•

•

. . • • •

. • ,. •

. • • •

.

'

• " '4! If 41 ..•

. ' • a • • • % P:

. . ' •:••• - - . *- • . • ..-;*

• . • .

. •

". .11 December •

▪

1973

• • • ' • .

.

..".s.

MEMORANDUM FOR

.lg:- l

.. e

. 1 , ilt

. - :. ..„.

, u

Programs are overviewed by proper .-- : ' . .,i- A

Congressional people. . • , .. ficic ......

Programs are WI run and while some. . .,..... 

A

:-....<

O

overruns exist in this high technology . , ..'"-eAi" area, they are outstanding compared to' -"

.

....t' "ea.

- c (--

• '

.

. . •

' ;•• C.P

4.• • • • •

. . •

••••• 4•40.•

• ••••1..??.

i.., . ,'...... •

- 10104.1*; •,•e'.•0•'• ....•:: : : . , • ..t • . • .-: . • .: .;• v., ..‘ .. ;,: . r ..... .11 . • ...". 4 '''. Auk. "•.••!-: • :::•-• •.. ' t %"

,I . r•

: • ' ."•.*',..`11.. • - :411.04,40' 4. . . • .. . •

• • :. . -..,....4e,, 1300 •r,•4,1••••• . • . • • 64....kt*.e. - • . • "

Mr. Plummer was shown the Washington Post article and the presi response prepaied by Dr. Schlesinger. For your information his comments are

"I would favor a reply or some type of countering

reply which makes these points. •

most military and non-military

procurements." •
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           8,626
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,187
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,247
<INVENTORY>                                     32,488
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               119,751
<PP&E>                                          37,905
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,184
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 176,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           85,824
<BONDS>                                         10,851
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,856
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   176,679
<SALES>                                         79,598
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               125,855
<CGS>                                           37,683
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   73,969
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 672
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,737
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,494
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,243
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (412)
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,631
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.92
        

</TABLE>
Copy of Resolution adopted by the Board



 Exhibit 10.1 
 COPY OF RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE 
 BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

 AT A MEETING HELD ON JUNE 21, 2008 AMENDING SECTION 6(c)(ii) 
 OF THE WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC. 2000 STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE 
 DIRECTORS 
 Director Stock Option Exercises 
 WHEREAS, the provisions of both Director Plans (Section 6(c)(ii) of the 2000 Plan and Section 6.04 of the 2006 Plan (by reference to the methods of paying the exercise price which may
be described in the related award agreement for a stock option granted under the 2006 Plan) permit the Board to authorize payment of the exercise price of the common shares underlying a stock option to be made (i) by tendering, either by actual
delivery of common shares or by attestation, common shares acceptable to the Board [which have been held for six months] or (ii) in the case of the 2006 Plan, by withholding common shares which would otherwise be issued in connection with the
exercise of the stock option; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board believes it would be in the best interest of the Company and
participants in the 2000 Plan [the Company’s 2000 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors] to amend Section 6(c)(ii) of the 2000 Plan to permit the Board to authorize payment of the exercise price of the common shares underlying a
stock option to be made by withholding common shares which would otherwise be issued in connection with the exercise of the stock option; and 
 ... 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that, as permitted by Section 9 of the 2000 Plan, the Board
hereby amends the second sentence of Section 6(c)(ii) of the 2000 Plan to read as follows: “Such payment may be made in cash, or its equivalent, or, if and to the extent permitted by the Board, by tendering, either by actual delivery of
Common Shares or by attestation, Common Shares acceptable to the Board, by the withholding of Common Shares which would otherwise be issued in connection with the exercise of the Director Option or by a combination of the foregoing, as determined by
the Board, provided that the combined value of all cash and cash equivalents and the Fair Market Value of any Common Shares so tendered to the Company as of the date of such tender or so withheld by the Company as of the date of such withholding is
at least equal to the purchase price of the Common Shares underlying the portion of the Director Option being exercised.”; and 
 ...

  

 28
exhibit10-6.htm


     

     

    
      

      

    

     

    



    ACKNOWLEDGMENT

    


    WHEREAS
Mexoro Minerals Ltd. (“Mexoro”) has issued three secured convertible debentures
to Paramount Gold and Silver Corp (“Paramount”) for a total principal amount of
one million three hundred and seventy thousand dollars US ($1,370,000.00USD)
bearing interest at a rate of eight percent (8%) per annum (the “Convertible
Debentures”);

    


    WHEREAS
Mexoro was due to pay accrued interest on the Convertible Debentures on October
10, 2008, for the period from May 9th, 2008
to October 10th, 2008
in the amount of thirty one thousand nine hundred and six dollars US
($31,906.00USD) (the “Interest Payments”);

    


    AND
WHEREAS Sunburst de Mexico S.A. de C.V. (“Sunburst”) is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Mexoro;

    


    AND
WHEREAS Paramount has agreed to defer the Interest Payments until November 10,
2008;

    


    NOW
THEREFORE, each of the undersigned acknowledge and agree that the Interest
Payments shall be paid by Mexoro and Sunburst jointly and severally to Paramount
on or before November 10, 2008 together with interest at the rate of eight
percent (8%) on the unpaid Interest Payments and together with all other
interests payments due at that time pursuant to the terms of the Convertible
Debentures.

    


    Each of
the undersigned further acknowledge and agree that the terms, conditions, rights
and obligations set forth in the Convertible Debentures remain in full force and
effect.

    


    


    Dated
this 14th day of
October, 2008.

    


    Mexoro
Minerals
Ltd.                                                                           Sunburst
de Mexico S.A. de C.V.

    


    Per:
__________________________                                              Per:
__________________________

    Name:                                                               Name:

    I have
authority to bind the
Corporation.                                          I
have the authority to bind the corporation.
*Thursday, August 5, 1999*

MOTION DOCKET

97-2020.

#### State v. Chinn.

Montgomery App. No. 16206. Upon consideration of the motion filed by counsel for appellant to stay execution in the above-styled cause pending the exhaustion of state post-conviction remedies, and it appearing from the exhibits to the motion that a petition for post-conviction relief was filed by appellant with the Montgomery County Common Pleas Court and that an appeal of the dismissal of that petition was filed in the Montgomery County Court of Appeals,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion be, and the same is hereby, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that execution of sentence be, and the same is hereby, stayed pending the exhaustion of all proceedings for post-conviction relief before courts of this state, including any appeals.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the appellant and for the appellee shall notify this court when all proceedings for post-conviction relief before courts of this state have been exhausted.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Pegasus Communications Corporation and subsidiaries on Forms S-8 and S-3 (File
Nos. 333-20357, 333-22823, 333-52755 and 333-23595) of our report dated February
12, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule of Pegasus Communications Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and
1996, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP




March 8, 1999
# C_2005115EN.01000401.xml

| 14.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 10 March 2005

in Case C-235/03 Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 35 Barcelona: QDQ Media SA v Alejandro Omedas Lecha (1)

1

(Directive 2000/35/EC - Definition of recovery costs - Expenses of abogado or procurador in judicial proceedings where use of those legal practitioners is not required - Impossible to include in the costs on the basis of national law - Impossible to rely on the directive against an individual)

(2005/C 115/07)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Case C-235/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 35 de Barcelona (Spain), made by decision of 5 May 2003, received at the Court on 2 June 2003, in the proceedings between QDQ Media SA and Alejandro Omedas Lecha — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of A. Borg Barthet, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet (Rapporteur) and S. von Bahr, Judges; J. Kokott, Advocate General, R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 10 March 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

Where it is not possible on the basis of national law to include, in the calculation of the costs which an individual who owes a business debt might be ordered to pay, the expenses arising from representation by an abogado or procurador of the creditor in judicial proceedings for the recovery of that debt, Directive 2000/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on combating late payment in commercial transactions cannot of itself serve as the basis for the inclusion of such expenses.

---

(1)  OJ C 171 of 19.07.03.

1

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                                [AA LETTERHEAD]
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
   As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
report (and to all references to our Firm) included in or made part of this
registration statement.
 
/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
 
New York, New York
November 6, 1998