alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN I 

gonorable E. L. Shelton 

county Audit or 

Clebume, Texas 

Dear Sir: pinion No. o-210.\ ‘\ 

This office 

uary 24 request 

sessor-Colleotor, 

ror an independent 

County taxes with 

of the school d 

ur letter of Janer the County Aaaooept State and 

qufring payment 

roiiaws: 

0r the board 0r 

d%et 

41 

ot for whloh such taxes have been 

ooi eoted.’ 

Aa lndloated above, an independent sohool distrlot may have its cyn-$ax assessor and colleotor, in whloh 

event there ooume no question as to the right of the 

oountr assessor and colleotor to receive County and State 

taxes without referenoe to the payment of the independent 

. . 

sohool district taxes. 
.----Lb -‘j 

Hon. E. L. Shelton, Page 2, January 27, 1939 

The oolleotlon of taxes due the State and County 

oould not be hampered by the Independent sohool dlstrlots 

taking advantage of the right given In ArtIole 2792 to have 

the oounty tax aasesaor and oolleotor act for them also. 

You are, therefore, advised that the oolleotor 

oan aooept the County and State taxes wIthout requiring 

payment of the Independent sohool dletrlot taxes. 

Yours very truly 

ATTORNEP GENERAL OF TEXAS 

By &-&&--L 

Assirtant 

GRL: FG
NRO Selects 2002 Class of Pioneers

Sept. 24, 2002

The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) has selected its Pioneer Class of 2002 - three people 

who made significant and lasting contributions to the discipline of national reconnaissance. The 

three selectees are Dr. Vance Coffman, Mr. Lee Hammarstrom, and retired Air Force Colonel 

Robert Paulson.

The new pioneers were honored in a ceremony today at NRO headquarters where plaques will be 

permanently displayed in their honor. They were selected by Under Secretary of the Air Force 

and NRO Director Peter Teets based on recommendations from a special selection board, and 

will join 50 pioneers selected over the past two years.

Dr. Coffman led the development of a new satellite attitude control capability needed to provide 

major improvements in producing large quantities of geographically accurate, highly-detailed 

maps from satellite-collected images. His career in national reconnaissance spanned from 1971 

to the present.

Mr. Hammarstrom's concepts and developments for satellite, ground station, and processing 

systems greatly improved the accuracy, timeliness, and volume of NRO ELINT products. 

Hammarstrom was named Head of the NRO's Technology Office and the NRO's Chief Scientist. 

His career in national reconnaissance spanned from 1962-2002.

Colonel Paulson served as the Air Force Program Manager for a multi-agency IMINT satellite 

system program. He successfully led his program office and operations team through the critical 

design, development, and testing of the system, and developed its complex ground architecture. 

His career in national reconnaissance spanned from 1982-1988.
National Reconnaissance Office 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Release #6-23 

July 26, 2023 

Office of Public Affairs 

Contact: 703-808-1198

NRO launches new, modern and dynamic web experience on NRO.gov

CHANTILLY, Va. – The National Reconnaissance Office is unveiling a new NRO.gov, a 

redesigned website that makes information easy to find and offers users a compelling 

picture of the organization’s mission, workforce, and legacy of innovation. 

“The new NRO.gov reflects the dynamic, engaging, and forward-thinking culture of the 

NRO,” NRO Director Chris Scolese said. “With its clear language and modern design, 

I’m confident users will easily find the information they need while getting an accurate 

picture of our cutting-edge technology and diverse team of highly skilled professionals.”

The new website prioritizes user experience through functional improvements: 

 Better access to career opportunities with more information on NRO job fields,

benefits, and current openings

 Resources to help businesses easily identify acquisition and research and

development opportunities

 Video and dynamic text to engage users and reflect NRO’s innovative culture

“Our new website is yet another way we are demonstrating transparency and building 

trust with the American people,” said Ben Fallon, director of NRO’s Office of 

Congressional and Public Affairs. “As people explore NRO.gov, we want to give them a 

clear understanding of what we do and even inspire them to work with us as future 

employees or business partners.”

Explore the new interface at NRO.gov.

###

The NRO develops, acquires, launches, and operates the world’s best intelligence, 

surveillance, and reconnaissance satellites to secure and expand America’s advantage in 

space. We are building a diversified and resilient architecture of spacecraft and ground 

systems designed to meet the challenges of a changing space environment by accelerating 

innovation and leveraging strategic partnerships, backed by a diverse and highly skilled 

workforce. At NRO, we see it, hear it, and sense it so our nation’s warfighters and 

policymakers have decision advantage amid increasing global competition. 

Learn more at NRO.gov.
exv4w12






Exhibit 4.12




RESTATED

CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

OF

ANCHOR CAPITAL FUNDING TRUST I




          THIS Restated Certificate of Trust of Anchor Capital Funding Trust I (the “Trust”) is being
duly filed by the undersigned, as trustees, to amend and restate the original Certificate of Trust
of the Trust (the “Certificate of Trust”), which was filed with the Secretary of State of the State
of Delaware on October 2, 2008, under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. Section 3801, et
seq.) (the “Act”).




          The Certificate of Trust shall be amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:




     1. Name. The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is Anchor Capital Funding
Trust I.



     2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust in the
State of Delaware are Wilmington Trust Company, Rodney Square North, 1100 North Market Street,
Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001, Attention: Corporate Trust Administration.



     3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon filing.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance
with Section 3811(a) of the Act.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY,

not in its individual capacity but solely as

trustee

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Erik Overcash
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Erik Overcash 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Assistant Vice President 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	                                                   /s/ Mark D. Timmerman
 	 
	 	Mark D. Timmerman, not individually but solely
as trustee
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 96-3332NI

_____________ Priscilla M. Waitek; Marc Waitek, * * Appellees, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Northern v. * District of Iowa. * The Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust, * [PUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: May 23, 1997

Filed: June 3, 1997

_____________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. The D alkon Shield Claimants Trust appeals the district court's denial of th e Trust's motions for judgment as a matter of la w and a new trial. See Waitek v. Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust , 934 F. Supp. 1068, 1100 (N.D. Iowa 1996). We review the district court's rulings under well-established standards. Ba sed on the record before us, we find no error that would require reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.

Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
•••

r.v

• •

•

IIRMORANDUK FOR DR. Amin wzraLan, Miler

Co 23 March 1944, I requested a reore al any =MT ia-konso • .

studka and investigations, sod contract work pertateing or aPPncable

to thellitRationsi Recenesissasce Prevent or its objectives. Oa

le April 3954, Cameral Carter, mein it year Whiff, endorsed the .

apporhndty to candoct Ude resew and suggested tint we enlarge thr

subject matter ammo to faclode aelicipated castractssi support to •....

be perforated by Director, Promos B.

in view el the impending FT 55 hediet decisions, we should • -

review the inven ory al your various projects as well as an indication • cm

at the caotrednal workload within the sad two weeks. uay we eatan •

exact dote dart", the week al 25 May.

ilwez

Brockway Mcialbn

Director

01) Rational Reccoosissenco was •••• •

•••

.•

Office • . .

ry

1-2 •Irrr

e

?.

11,1114"9;

•

•
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 25, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-41479 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN MANUEL CARDENAS-JASSO, also known as 

Juan Antonio Longoria-Hernandez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. M-02-CR-328-1

--------------------

Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan

Manuel Cardenas-Jasso has moved for leave to withdraw and has

filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Cardenas has not filed a response. Our independent

review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
No. 02-41479

-2-

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.
commoLeoluternal

COPY Of COPMS

PAOC-,1.....01:=E:PAOCS

1 December 1977

Shields' Version of Dr. Nark's Philosophy in Organizing and Running 

the SRO.

Work with Program Managers, acting as a Board of Directors,

in formulating 1110 policy, plans, and top-level program.

Oat out to Program Offices monthly and keep them informed

about Washington happenings..

More Program A closer to the Air Force, so that the Mx Force

corporately will develop a feeling of involvement with and

sharing in the SRO.

Aggregate the Staff into fewer elements in order to enhance

the prestige of the deputy directors and, thus, attract very

able and promising people.

Consolidate and eliminate staff functions with a view to

helping the manning problem in the Secretariat.

Consider possible evolution of the Staff into another form,

e.g., Air Force, ASO (C I), IC Staff.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

November 30, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-20-00841-CV

STERLING GREEN COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION, 

Appellant

V.

ROBERT COLLINS, PAMELA ST. CROIX, CATHY HAIRBOTTLE, 

BRIAN HAIRBOTTLE, AND LIVINGSTON HAMPTON, Appellees

On Appeal from the 55th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-51603-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order appointing a receiver signed 

December 4, 2020. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(1). On October 

27, 2021, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 
2

42.1(a)(1). The motion is granted. The court taxes costs against the appellant.1 See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Spain, and Hassan.

1 The only costs paid in this court on appeal is the filing fee.
•

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

WASHINGTON SONG

ommigarnatommTmw 10 June 1975

•

MDIRANU14 FOR GENERAL BRADBURN

SUBJECT: Class Determination and Findings

On 9 June 1975, with the concurrence of the Air Force

General Counsel's Office, Mr. Plummer signed the attached

Class Determination and Findings authorizing the negotiation

of contracts. As a statutory appointee, Mr. Plummer is

authorized to act as agency head for matters within his

purview.

•••

TR S. PEYTON

Major, USAF

Assistant Deputy Director

for Plans and Policy

Office of Space Systems.

1 Attachment

Determinations and Findings

IMP••• t.
1.***

s.. ••4

MARINES' OF THE AIR FORCE 

anumisAIlox AND FINDINGS 

MINORITE TO ':EGOTIATECONTRACTS 

Upon the basis of the following findings and determination which I hereby

make as agency heed, the proposed contracts described below say be negotiated without formal advertising.pursuant to the authority of 10 U.S.C.

2304(4(11).

'FINDINGS

The Director, Office of Special Projects, OSAF, proposed to procure

by negotiation expesisiestal, developmental or research work calling for

the design, development, fabrication and the furnishing of satellite

vehicles, subsystems, boosters and payloads; software, design data, test,

drawings and mockups, test articles and components; instrumentation and

contractor flight tests and demonstration; contractor support (including

spares, spare parts, special support equipment, repairs, and launch

services); publications and reports. The proposed class of contracts

will not call for quantity production within the meanies of paragraph

3-211.3 of the Armed Services Procurement Regulation.

Procurement by negotiation of the above described services and

property is necessary because it is impossible to describe in precise

detail or by definite drawings and specifications the nature of the

work to be done under the proposed class of contracts; only the ultimate objectives and scope of the work can be outlined.

3. Use of formal advertislag for procurement of the above described

services and property is impracticable because it is impossible to

describe in precise detail or by any definite drawings and specificstioes, the nature of the work to be done; only the ultimate objectives

and general scope of the work can be outlined.

pummumom 

The proposed contracts are for experimental, developmental or research

work. This class determination shall remain in effect until 30 September

1976. "Should Cost" evaluations are not applicable to the proposed

contracts.

Date 9 Jun* 1975

•• • • • oa • aro •••• rorroor
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF

PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, J. David Berkley, the President of Sterion Incorporated (the Company) in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ J. David Berkley

J. David Berkley

Title:  President, Sterion Incorporated

Dated:  February 14, 2003



I, Mark Buckrey, the Chief Financial Officer of Sterion Incorporated (the Company) in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Mark Buckrey

Mark Buckrey

Title:  Chief Financial Officer, Sterion Incorporated

Dated:  February 14, 2003
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 10-41220 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JEREMY ANTHONY EDEN, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:10-CR-320-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * T h e F e d e r a l P ub l i c D e f e n d er appointed to represent J e r e m y An t h o n y E d e n has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Eden has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion fo r l e a ve to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D August 16, 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-41220 Document: 00511573494 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2011No. 10-41220

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 10-41220 Document: 00511573494 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/16/2011
#### A. B. Wheeler & Son Company, Respondent, vs. Edenhofer and husband, Appellants.

*October 25*

November *14, 1911.*

*Sales: Warranty of furnace.*

A warranty that a combination furnace (one in which either coal or wood might be used as fuel) would properly heat the vendee’s house in the coldest weather, was not a warranty that such furnace would heat the house in the coldest weather when wood alone was used.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Marathon county: A. H. Reib, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

The cause was submitted for the appellants on the brief of *Kreutzer, Bird, Bosenberry •& Olconeslci,*and for the respondent on that of *Brown, Pradt & Cenrich*and *C. T. Edgar.*

WiNSlow, C. J.

This is an action to' foreclose a mechanic’s lien upon defendants’ house for the purchase price of a furnace. There is absolutely no dispute as to the facts, and the only question presented is whether there was a breach of the warranty under which the furnace was sold. The contract of sale was oral. The furnace was what is called a com*271bination fnrnace, that is, one in which either coal or wood may be nsed as fuel, and it was warranted to properly heat the defendants’ house in the coldest weather. As matter of fact, it would not properly heat the house in the coldest weather when fired with wood only, except by means of excessive firing and attention. By using coal or coke as fuel it will, however, heat the house in accordance with the warranty.

Under these circumstances, was there any breach of the warranty ? The trial court decided this question in the negative, and with that decision this court agrees. There was no express undertaking that the furnace would heat the house in the coldest weather when wood alone was used as fuel, but only that it would properly heat the house at that time. The fact is undisputed that it will do so when the proper fuel is used. It is considered that it was the duty of the defendants to use that fuel.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT,

INC., et al

.,

Plaintiffs

,

v.

JOCELYN BENSON, et al.,

Defendants. )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) No. 20

- 1567C

(Filed: November 12, 2020 )

ORDER

On November 10, 2020, t he Plaintiffs, Donald Trump for President, Inc, et al.

, filed the

present action with th e United States Court of Claims. Complaint, ECF No. 1. The complaint

names as defendants Jocelyn Benson ( in her official capacity as Michigan Secretary of State ) , as

well as several state and county entities. It purports to ground j urisdiction on 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331

and 1343. Id. The plaintiffs allege the commiss ion of violations of the United States

Constitution, the Michigan Constitution, and Michigan law

, in Wayne County, Michigan during

the recent Presidential election. They seek a variety of injunctive relief.

The complaint is captioned as though it were fil ed in the United States District Court for

the Western District of Michigan . Instead, however, it was filed with this Court , presumably by

accident

.

Jurisdiction is a threshold matter, Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t , 523 U.S. 83,

94

– 95 (1998), and the Court may raise the issue on its own at any time without a motion from a

party, Folden v. United States , 379 F.3d 1344, 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2004); see also Rule 12(h)(3) of

the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (stating that “[i]f the court determines at any time that it

lacks subject

- matter jurisdiction, the court must dismiss the action ).

The Tucker Act grants the United States Court of Federal Claims jurisdiction over

monetary actions “against the United States founde d either upon the Constitution, or any Act of

Congress or any regulation of an executive department, or upon any express or implied contract

with the United States, or for liquidated or unliquidated damages in cases not sounding in tort.”

28 U.S.C. § 1491( a)(1). It does not confer jurisdiction over claims against any entity other than2 the United States. United States v. Sherwood , 312 U.S. 584, 588 (1941). Further, the Court lacks

jurisdiction over claims for injunctive relief unless such relief is “incident of and collateral to” a

monetary judgment, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(2), which means it is “tied and subordinate to a money

judgment,” James v. Caldera , 159 F.3d 573, 580 (Fed. Cir. 1998) (quoting Austin v. United

States , 206 Ct. Cl. 719, 723 (1975)).

The pre sent complaint involves claims against state and local government entities, not the

United States. It also requests injunctive relief not collateral to a money judgment. The Court

lacks jurisdiction over the complaint. A transfer of the complaint is warran ted in the interests of

justice. Therefore, the Court directs that the Clerk TRANSFER the case to the United States

District Court for the Western District of Michigan in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

IT IS SO ORDERED

.

s/ Elaine D. Kaplan

ELAINE D. KAPLAN

Judge
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of AMF Bowling Worldwide, Inc.
(the Company), certifies that:



|1. | the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 3, 2005 (the Report) of the Company to which this certification is an exhibit fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of July 3, 2005 and for
the period then ended.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: September 30, 2005



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|                                           
|/s/    FREDERICK R. HIPP                   
|Frederick R. Hipp                          
|President and Chief Executive Officer      
|(principal executive and financial officer)