alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
iONIR

or the customer

How ml'

x? How many

quired?

n•

• 411111VaLg viaewoLe

SF.7.1cy Owning JOINTLY TVA ...tint..

I', " P.0"1 4o.

•

•••""ret

SUMMIP11211

446,Pir-ra..4"/ / 96 7

THE NRO/DIA/NPIC LSTERFACE

I. GENERAL 

A. How well/badly is the present interface working?

Specific customer problems

Customer suggested solutions to problems

II. SPECIFIC 

1. Camera Manuals

(a) How useful, as written?

How widely used? How many people have signed the

access sheet? How are the dates of those signatures

distributed? Biased back toward publication date?

Or are many fairly recent?

Do the manuals contain enough/too much/too little

information?

(d) What would

were TICII with

wo

ne earances

2. Operational Messages

How does the customer handleillintessages?-

Do the people who handle these messages have clearances

just to do this job or would they have clearances anyway?

How many people are involved?

Are the present arrangements ' re these messages satisfactory? If not, what change is suggested?

3. Planning

(a) How does the customer do his resources planning for the

NDLE VIA

SYSTEMSJOINTLY

TOP SECREI 
V∎ A

a a.... '

filtSTEDAS J004:104

0? sEcREI

future (personnel, facilities, equipment)?

(b) How many

How m4Sr

would ha

involved directly in this planning?

clearances? How many of these

arances anyway?

(c) Does the customer believe he is getting enough, or the

-correct, information for do Altura resources planning?

What changes are suggested?

P

LE voe

70P .q. s•tvi ET "1

vsTrwa.: .30041-1.Y

11
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS'
 
The Board of Trustees of
Cabot Industrial Trust:
 
We consent to the use of our report included herein dated July 2, 1998,
relating to the combined balance sheets of the Pennsylvania Public School
Employes' Retirement System Industrial Properties Portfolio as of December 31,
1997 and 1996, and the related combined statements of operations, owner's
equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and the
period from July 6, 1995 (date of acquisition) to December 31, 1995, and the
related schedule as of December 31, 1997, included herein, and to the reference
to our firm under the heading "Experts" in this registration statement on Form
S-11 of Cabot Industrial Trust.
 
                                       KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
Chicago, Illinois
August 13, 1998
null

445.70627
[English
      Translation]

     

    Strategic
      Partnership Agreement

     

    Party
      A:
      Beijing Xin’ao Concrete Co., Ltd (the “Xin’ao”)

    


    Party
      B:
      Changping Branch of Beijing Shangdi Xingda Co., Ltd, (the “Xingda
      Changping”)

     

    In
      accordance with the purpose of strengthening both parties’ competitiveness and
      area benefit, Xin’ao and Xing’da Changping agree to jointly set up a strategic
      partnership from the day of January 1, 2008. 

    


    1.
      This
      partnership in concrete industry begins from January 1, 2008. The partnership
      embodies raw material providing and conformity of concrete market aiming at
      increasing both parties’ benefit.

    


    2.
      Both
      parties shall transfer the project which does not belong to one’s service radius
      to the other party or assist the other party in conclusion of the contract.
      The
      beneficiary (party) shall pay certain amount of money on the basic of project
      quantity and benefit but no less than RMB5yuan per square.

    


    3.
      If one
      party’s equipments leave unused in a certain period, the other party has the
      priority to use at 75% of market price.

    


    4.
      During
      the process of bidding, under the precondition of compliance with the laws,
      both
      parties shall provide co-operation service to each other for free. 

    


    5.
      Strategic partnership mechanism. In order to push the strategic co-operation
      effectively, both parties agree:

    


    
      	 	
              i.

            	
              Both
                parties will hold a top executive meeting every 90 days to solve
                the
                problem during co-operation.

            


    

    


    
      	
            	ii.	
              The
                people who in charge of operating, producing and other relevant parts
                in
                both parties will have a marketing co-ordination meeting every 30
                days to
                solve the problem during
                co-operation.

            


    

    


    
      	 	
              iii.

            	
              Both
                parties will assign a person who is in charge of daily communication
                respectively.

            


    

    


    6.
      Any
      issues which have not been included will be recorded in “Meeting Minutes” after
      both parties sign. If both parties meet any important issues, a complementary
      agreement should be concluded. The “Meeting Minutes” and the complementary
      agreement have the same legal valid. 

     

    Attachments
      are copies of business licenses of both parties.

    


    
      	
              Party
                A:

            	
              Party
                B:
•

• qp.40,41 0141gINMAxit*tisritlik

COWL OR liteirlOgi7O: •

. •

11411CD (or iitilmiDed) N410411 ANO•TITLE

•

U. S. 1110VERNSIONT PRINTING OPPIC111 Isle—irsom


seinuesapiewit rettemNsernaci

4Lik 441.01f4 irRItlitTheNCY
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research (#1203); Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC), University of Utah Site Visit.                    

*Dates & Times:*

May 27, 2015; 7:15 p.m.-9:00 p.m.

May 28, 2015; 7:15 a.m.-8:30 p.m.

May 29, 2015; 7:15 a.m.-4:00 p.m.

*Place:*                         University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Part open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Daniele Finotello, Program Director, Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers Program, Division of Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-4676.                    

*Purpose Of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning further support of the MRSEC at the University of Utah.                    

## Agenda

### Wednesday, May 27, 2015

7:15 p.m.-9:00 p.m. Closed—Briefing of panel.

### Thursday, May 28, 2015

7:15 a.m.-4:30 p.m. Open—Review of the MRSEC.

5:00 p.m.-6:45 p.m. Closed—Executive Session.

6:45 p.m.-8:30 p.m. Open—Dinner.

### Friday, May 29, 2015

7:15 a.m.-9:50 a.m. Closed—Executive Session.

9:50 a.m.-4:00 p.m. Closed—Executive Session, Draft and Review Report.

*Reason For Closing:*                         The work being reviewed during the site visit may include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the MRSEC. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: February 11, 2015.

Suzanne Plimpton,

Acting Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-03176 Filed 2-13-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
null

318.20563
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE REGISTRANT, 
PURSUANT TO 17 CFR
240.13a  14(a) OR 17 CFR 240.15d  14(a) I, Richard K. McClelland, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Dynamex Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of Dynamex Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in
this annual report.4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
we have:  a.
    
    Designed such controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this annual report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation, andc.
    
    Disclosed in this annual report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of this annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting;  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors;  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal controls which could
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal controls over financial reporting. Date: October 14, 2004 /s/ RICHARD K. McCLELLAND
United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 13, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 03-30365

JENIFER ARBAUGH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

Y&H CORPORATION, d.b.a. The Moonlight Café;

and YACLIN HATIPOGLU,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal From the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

On August 2, 2004, we affirmed the district court’s dismissal

of Arbaugh’s suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under our

binding precedent, which held that a failure to qualify as an

“employer” with fifteen employees under Title VII deprives a

district court of subject matter jurisdiction. Arbaugh v. Y&H

Corp., 380 F.3d 219, 224 (5th Cir. 2004). The Supreme Court granted
2

certiorari and on February 22, 2006, reversed and remanded, holding

that the threshold number of employees for application of Title VII

is an element of a plaintiff’s claim for relief, not a

jurisdictional issue. Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp., 126 S. Ct. 1235, 1245

(2006). Thus, the Supreme Court has overruled the basis for the

district court’s dismissal and our affirmance. Accordingly, we

REVERSE the decision of the district court and REMAND this case for

further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.
THE' 

<', ::-~ ,.';- " ....; .-,,). 

SUBJECT; The: Na.tiona.J. r..,..· 

J.. c;. S Pl2.1l for the Exploitation of MuliiRE~JT';::I~E?'~CE: S(;C 2' c'tal'")?" of 'j ('.j~ t·::: .... s C ffi'.2::Y10randfu'J'l of' I L .. Oct 1965 J 

subj 2et:. -=\d f-Icc II"t~;:.ge ry' In~erp:'"ct::.ti9n R e't.rieV~l Group 

(SeCD(;(CoEtyol l':c:,_ X-5722) 

1'':-:.1.~ Di~ectGr·o{. C0;]1tr,al ITl.teilig~:~~~c-:e 2..n4 I ~na:'IC jOi11tly~ al)proved t}i .. 8 report 

of ~:-L0 J'oi::t Irr~age:ry bJ.tc~"Pl·(:'t2.ti ()l: f( t:"/icv~1 G:r01..1P, inc~t:ding the tl·National '. , ,. ' n-; 1 ~ D~ r' • ~ ... -.. " ... ~ • .~ '\ <\" ':' i' ~ "'!" ' r t /\ '" . J..aSl'-:lng ..l..la:rl lor -CDC .L~-:,'::PlOli.,2..t,.~",(;~n 01 i/ltll.;l-\..,..Ie.:::sor .iInageryr. .."""'1. COl:')-)" ot 

·cli.c~Go::;-J-plcie report is D.~t?'~C}lCd .. "Vlt; sl-:.a:"'\;.th.e convicti9n tl1at the Cll)plicat .: .:.... .... ., ~ r ................ ':\ C' ,:'\ ... .; '( .:: 'Y" '"\ r~', -.~ r : .... ~,~; r, .:-"' '.-., '('" .~ f -- .:... i ~~ 11 ,... -:::. ........ ,,"'t" c· , - ~v.'- U.c o ..... ~ .le;ol)"c\.~Je .l""7?.o\"~) "-""~~,;:,"~~C-L_'_' _ _ \~s,·",~ es In cO::lSODa.nCe 

'\vitl:. th.is 'l:>la~ \Vill- contTi-t)-u.f'0--t--e-.r-4.:-h~-=-D·ax;---~~U-lt:l {~f.fecti\;-e. utilizatioTL.and .. _"" 

de\:~cloprr:.t;nt of t}lCS~ r~souI"CCS in s:l.ti.s.fying short:- al1.,d 19n9-tc:rm U. S. 

i:-(tclli.;'J'cnce needs for ·1!1.l"a2:c-dcri~I·2d_ 'i-c;.forr":'12..tiol1 at the national level .. o .' ,,-, ~ . . 

Under the 'provisions of, t,his l"cspo:isibility, is specifically vested 

in tl1G DIY'ector, Defense' Intclll£cric(; .f\gel1c)r, io·r th.e' coordinated taskino" , '~", D 

of p::!.rticinating De-oartn'lci1t d£. D8ie;"lsc c.l=.::mel1ts,,' ... ... CJ ... " 

AlI DoD orgazlizatioli.s,' ,agenci;~·:.s, c:Jr:n.rrl~-!.ndsJ 2.n~l uni.ts'tasked by} or parti~ 

" • , ,. 1:)1 • - - r<' , •. -• ,'. . .' • • Clp2 .. tl1}.g J.n. tnls .... ..Lal1 Y/l~.L ..... 1.r~.ct rl-!Cll" Cl'iOl"tS "[oward lns~rlng J..ts successful 

ir"ll.plenl.'entation and, exe cutiOil. J\.dc:i tiollall ~t,), to the fLllle st e:o-.::tent "rr actic- , l' D D l' ",,' , ' -. '" .,.. , abJ.c, a.Ll. 0 e 81h(:nts '\,\",:"111. ta,<t; C():ltJ.z.":r.,u:ng auv,.rar"'l.age or t.tl€::. L"'lIormatlon 

nl.~dc available as a 'result of ~l-~:3 Plan. 

Approved for Release: 2018/02/01 C05101935 

i 

i 

I 

I 

i 

i ---i .. I 

I 

i 

I 

I 

r
Order entered February 9, 2023

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-22-01245-CV

IN RE ADENIYO OLAOLUWA, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-09127

ORDER Before Justices Nowell, Goldstein, and Breedlove 1

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for

writ of mandamus. We also LIFT the stay issued by our November 22, 2022 order.

/s/ MARICELA BREEDLOVE

JUSTICE

1 The Honorable Justice Lana Myers was origina lly a member of this panel. The Honorable Justice Breedlove succeeded Justice Myers on this pa nel when her term expired on December 31, 2022.
```

                              FIRST M & F CORPORATION

                                      EXHIBIT 32
                             SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of First M & F Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugh S. Potts, Jr., Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

   A. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   B. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

DATE: November 8, 2004                    BY:   /s/ Hugh S. Potts, Jr.
                                             ----------------------------------
                                                 Hugh S. Potts, Jr.
                                                 Chairman and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of First M & F Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John G. Copeland,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   C. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   D. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

DATE: November 8, 2004                 BY:   /s/ John G. Copeland
                                             ----------------------------------
                                              John G. Copeland
                                              EVP and Chief Financial Officer
```
#### Harnisch, Respondent, vs. Hehli, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Ramsdell, King & Linderman*of Eau . Claire.

For the respondent: *H. W. Rudow*and *A. L. Quilling,*both of Menomonie.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1176/2006

of 1 August 2006         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 2 August 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 August 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 1 August 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), theundersigned officer of Supreme Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) doeshereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 25,2010 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

 
| DATE:  November 5, 2010 |   | /s/  Herbert M. Gardner  |
|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                         |   | Herbert  M. Gardner      |
|                         |   | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Qpursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not beingfiled as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Lattice, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2013 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul Burgess, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: November 14,
    2013 | By: | /s/  Paul Burgess                                           
|--------------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------
|                            |     | Paul Burgess
        President (principal executive officer)