7968 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

■ 3. In appendix C to part 4022, Rate Set 

257, as set forth below, is added to the 

table. 

Appendix C to Part 4022—Lump Sum 

Interest Rates for Private-Sector 

Payments 

* * * * * 

Rate set 

For plans with a valuation 

date Immediate 

annuity rate 

(percent) 

Deferred annuities 

(percent) 

On or after Before i1 i2 i3 n1 n2

*******

257 ................................ 3–1–15 4–1–15 0.50 4.00 4.00 4.00 7 8 

Issued in Washington, DC, on this 6th day 

of February 2015. 

Judith Starr, 

General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty 

Corporation. 

[FR Doc. 2015–03050 Filed 2–12–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7709–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2014–0751] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; Triathlon National 

Championships, Milwaukee Harbor, 

Milwaukee, Wisconsin 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is 

establishing a safety zone within 

Milwaukee Harbor in Milwaukee, 

Wisconsin. This zone is intended to 

restrict vessels from a portion of 

Milwaukee Harbor due to the 2015 

Olympic and Sprint Distance National 

Championships. This safety zone is 

necessary to protect the surrounding 

public and vessels from the hazards 

associated with the 2015 Olympic and 

Sprint Distance National 

Championships. 

DATES: This final rule is effective from 

August 1, 2015, until August 30, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in 

this preamble are part of docket USCG– 

2014–0751. To view documents 

mentioned in this preamble as being 

available in the docket, go to http://

www.regulations.gov, type the docket 

number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click 

‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket 

Folder on the line associated with this 

rulemaking. You may also visit the 

Docket Management Facility in Room 

W12–140 on the ground floor of the 

Department of Transportation West 

Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this rule, contact 

MST1 Joseph McCollum, Prevention 

Department, Coast Guard Sector Lake 

Michigan, Milwaukee, WI at (414) 747– 

7148 or by email at 

Joseph.P.McCollum@USCG.mil. If you 

have questions on viewing or submitting 

material to the docket, call Cheryl 

Collins, Program Manager, Docket 

Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Acronyms 

DHS Department of Homeland Security 

FR Federal Register 

NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

TFR Temporary Final Rule 

A. Regulatory History and Information 

On December 30, 2014, The Coast 

Guard published an NPRM entitled 

Safety Zone; Triathlon National 

Championships, Milwaukee Harbor, 

Milwaukee, Wisconsin in the Federal 

Register (79 FR 78369). We did not 

receive any comments in response to the 

proposed rule. No public meeting was 

requested and none was held. 

B. Basis and Purpose 

The legal basis for this rule is the 

Coast Guard’s authority to establish 

safety zones: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 33 CFR 

1.05–1, 160.5; Department of Homeland 

Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

In 2014, the Coast Guard was 

informed that the Olympic and Sprint 

Distance National Championships are 

scheduled to return to Milwaukee 

Harbor in 2015. Within and around 

Milwaukee Harbor at Lakeshore inlet, 

this event is expected to involve 

thousands of participants competing in 

a swim race surrounded by thousands of 

spectators. The swim portion of this 

event is anticipated to occur on three 

days during the second week of August, 

2015. The Captain of the Port Lake 

Michigan has determined that the 

likelihood of transiting watercraft 

during the swim competition involving 

a large number of competitors presents 

a significant risk of serious injuries or 

fatalities. 

C. Discussion of Comments, Changes 

and the Final Rule 

The Captain of the Port Lake 

Michigan has determined that a safety 

zone is necessary to mitigate the 

aforementioned safety risks. Thus, this 

rule establishes a safety zone that 

encompasses all waters of Milwaukee 

Harbor, including Lakeshore inlet and 

the Marina at Pier Wisconsin, west of an 

imaginary line across the entrance to the 

Marina at Pier Wisconsin connecting 

coordinates 43°02.253′ N., 087°53.623′ 

W. and 43°01.737′ N., 087°53.727′ W. 

(NAD 83). 

This rule will be effective from 

August 1, 2015, until August 30, 2015. 

Additionally, the Coast Guard 

anticipates that this safety zone will be 

enforced from 10:30 a.m. until 2:30 p.m. 

on August 7; from 6:30 a.m. until 4:30 

p.m. on August 8, and from 6:30 a.m. 

until 11:30 a.m. on August 9, 2015. This 

2015 enforcement schedule may change, 

and in the event of a change, the 

Captain of the Port Lake Michigan will 

issue a Notice of Enforcement with an 

updated enforcement schedule. 

The Captain of the Port Lake 

Michigan will notify the public that the 

zone in this rule is or will be enforced 

by all appropriate means to the affected 

segments of the public including 

publication in the Federal Register as 

practicable, in accordance with 33 CFR 

165.7(a). Such means of notification 

may also include, but are not limited to 

Broadcast Notice to Mariners or Local 

Notice to Mariners. 

All persons and vessels shall comply 

with the instructions of the Captain of 

the Port Lake Michigan or her 

designated on-scene representative. 

Entry into, transiting, or anchoring 

within the safety zone is prohibited 

unless authorized by the Captain of the 

Port Lake Michigan or her designated 

on-scene representative. The Captain of 


Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 7969 

the Port Lake Michigan or her 

designated on-scene representative may 

be contacted via VHF Channel 16. 

D. Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on these statutes or executive 

orders. 

1. Regulatory Planning and Review 

This rule is not a significant 

regulatory action under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review, and does not 

require an assessment of potential costs 

and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that 

Order. The Office of Management and 

Budget has not reviewed it under that 

Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the 

regulatory policies and procedures of 

the Department of Homeland Security 

(DHS). We conclude that this rule is not 

a significant regulatory action because 

we anticipate that it will have minimal 

impact on the economy, will not 

interfere with other agencies, will not 

adversely alter the budget of any grant 

or loan recipients, and will not raise any 

novel legal or policy issues. Overall, we 

expect the economic impact of this rule 

to be minimal and that a full Regulatory 

Evaluation is unnecessary. 

2. Impact on Small Entities 

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 

5 U.S.C. 601–612, we have considered 

whether this rule would have significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. The term 

‘‘small entities’’ comprises small 

businesses, not-for-profit organizations 

that are independently owned and 

operated and are not dominant in their 

fields, and governmental jurisdictions 

with populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 

605(b) that this rule would not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

This rule will affect the following 

entities, some of which might be small 

entities: The owners or operators of 

vessels intending to transit or anchor 

within the waters of the marina at Pier 

Wisconsin or Lakeshore inlet during the 

times in which the safety zone is 

enforced in August of 2015. 

This safety zone will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities for 

the following reasons: This rule will be 

enforced for a limited time during the 

month of August; further, this safety 

zone has been designed to allow traffic 

to pass safely around the zone whenever 

possible, and vessels will be allowed to 

pass through the zone with the 

permission of the Captain of the Port. 

3. Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this rule so that they can 

better evaluate its effects on them and 

participate in the rulemaking process. If 

this rule would affect your small 

business, organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact the person 

listed in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section, above. The Coast 

Guard will not retaliate against small 

entities that question or complain about 

this rule or any policy or action of the 

Coast Guard. 

4. Collection of Information 

This rule calls for no new collection 

of information under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 

3520). 

5. Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on State or local governments and 

would either preempt State law or 

impose a substantial direct cost of 

compliance on them. We have analyzed 

this rule under that Order and have 

determined that it does not have 

implications for federalism. 

6. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to contact the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places or vessels. 

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this rule 

would not result in such an 

expenditure, we do discuss the effects of 

this rule elsewhere in this preamble. 

8. Taking of Private Property 

This rule would not affect a taking of 

private property or otherwise have 

taking implications under Executive 

Order 12630, Governmental Actions and 

Interference with Constitutionally 

Protected Property Rights. 

9. Civil Justice Reform 

This rule meets applicable standards 

in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive 

Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to 

minimize litigation, eliminate 

ambiguity, and reduce burden. 

10. Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Executive Order 13045, Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not 

an economically significant rule and 

would not create an environmental risk 

to health or risk to safety that might 

disproportionately affect children. 

11. Indian Tribal Governments 

This rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

12. Energy Effects 

This action is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under Executive Order 

13211, Actions Concerning Regulations 

That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. 

13. Technical Standards 

This rule does not use technical 

standards. Therefore, we did not 

consider the use of voluntary consensus 

standards. 

14. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Management Directive 023–01 and 

Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 

which guide the Coast Guard in 

complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have determined that this action is one 

of a category of actions which do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule involves the 

establishment of a safety zone and thus, 

is categorically excluded under 

paragraph (34)(g) of the Instruction. An 

environmental analysis checklist 


Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
7970 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 30 / Friday, February 13, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

supporting this determination is 

available in the docket where indicated 

under ADDRESSES. We seek any 

comments or information that may lead 

to the discovery of a significant 

environmental impact from this rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department 

of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Add § 165.T09–0751 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T09–0751 Safety Zone; Triathlon 

National Championships, Milwaukee 

Harbor, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 

(a) Location. The safety zone will 

encompass all waters of Milwaukee 

Harbor, including Lakeshore inlet and 

the marina at Pier Wisconsin, west of an 

imaginary line across the entrance to the 

Marina at Pier Wisconsin connecting 

coordinates 43°02.253′ N, 087°53.623′ W 

and 43°01.737′ N, 087°53.727′ W (NAD 

83). 

(b) Effective period. This safety zone 

is effective from August 1, 2015, until 

August 30, 2015. The Coast Guard 

anticipates that this safety zone will be 

enforced from 10:30 a.m. until 2:30 p.m. 

on August 7; from 6:30 a.m. until 4:30 

p.m. on August 8, and from 6:30 a.m. 

until 11:30 a.m. on August 9, 2015. This 

2015 enforcement schedule may change, 

and in the event of a change, the 

Captain of the Port Lake Michigan will 

issue a Notice of Enforcement with an 

updated enforcement schedule. 

(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with 

the general regulations in § 165.23 of 

this part, entry into, transiting, or 

anchoring in this safety zone is 

prohibited unless authorized by the 

Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or her 

designated on-scene representative. 

(2) This safety zone is closed to all 

vessel traffic except as permitted by the 

Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or her 

designated on-scene representative. 

(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of 

the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan 

is any Coast Guard commissioned, 

warrant, or petty officer who has been 

designated by the Captain of the Port 

Lake Michigan to act on her behalf. The 

Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or her 

designated on-scene representative may 

be contacted via VHF Channel 16. 

(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter 

or operate within the safety zone shall 

contact the Captain of the Port Lake 

Michigan or her designated on-scene 

representative to obtain permission to 

do so. Vessel operators given permission 

to enter or operate in the safety zone 

must comply with all directions given to 

them by the Captain of the Port Lake 

Michigan or her on-scene 

representative. 

Dated: January 30, 2014. 

A.B. Cocanour, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Lake Michigan. 

[FR Doc. 2015–03074 Filed 2–12–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 81 

[EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0690; FRL–9921–31– 

Region 3] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; West 

Virginia’s Redesignation Request and 

Associated Maintenance Plan of the 

West Virginia Portion of the 

Martinsburg-Hagerstown, WV-MD 

Nonattainment Area for the 1997 

Annual Fine Particulate Matter 

Standard; Correction 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Final rule; correcting 

amendments. 

SUMMARY: This document corrects an 

error in the rule language of a final rule 

pertaining to West Virginia’s request to 

redesignate to attainment the West 

Virginia portion of the MartinsburgHagerstown, WV-MD nonattainment 

area for the 1997 annual fine particulate 

matter (PM2.5) national ambient air 

quality standard (NAAQS), which was 

published in the Federal Register on 

Tuesday, November 25, 2014 (79 FR 

70099). 

DATES: This document is effective on 

February 13, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose 

Quinto, (215) 814–2182 or by email at 

quinto.rose@.epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

November 25, 2014 (79 FR 70099), the 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

published a final rulemaking action 

announcing the approval of West 

Virginia’s request to redesignate to 

attainment the Martinsburg-Hagerstown, 

WV-MD nonattainment area for the 1997 

annual PM2.5 NAAQS. 

Need for Correction 

As published, the final redesignation 

contains an error. EPA inadvertently 

added the word ‘‘Moderate’’ in the table 

for the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. The 

intent of the final rule was to 

redesignate the Area to attainment. 

Moderate is a classification for 

nonattainment areas. This action 

corrects the table of 40 CFR part 81 for 

West Virginia’s 1997 annual PM2.5

NAAQS. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81 

Air pollution, National Parks, 

Wilderness areas. 

Dated: January 28, 2015. 

William C. Early, 

Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region 

III. 

Accordingly, 40 CFR part 81 is 

corrected by making the following 

correcting amendments: 

PART 81—DESIGNATION OF AREAS 

FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING 

PURPOSES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 81 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

■ 2. Section 81.349 is amended by 

revising the entry for ‘‘Martinsburg, WVHagerstown, MD: Berkeley County’’ at 

the end of the table titled ‘‘West 

Virginia—1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS’’ 

to read as follows: 

§ 81.349 West Virginia. 

* * * * * 


Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES