alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
 WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (a)
    
    The Form 10-K of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership for the period ended December 31,
2008 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership.
 Date: February 27, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Thomas H. LowderThomas H. LowderChief Executive Officer of
Colonial Properties Trust,the general partner of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership 149
Arthur Andersen LLP





                              Independent Accountant's Report

To the Board of Directors of
ContiMortgage Corporation:

We  have  examined  management's  assertion  about  ContiMortgage  Corporation's
compliance  with the minimum  servicing  standards  identified  in the  Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers (USAP) and that ContiMortgage  Corporation had in effect a fidelity bond
and errors and omissions  policy in the amount of  $11,200,000 as of and for the
year ended December 31, 1996, included in the accompanying management assertion.
Management is responsible for ContiMortgage  Corporation's compliance with those
minimum  servicing  standards and for maintaining a fidelity bond and errors and
omissions  policy.  Our  responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion about the entity's compliance with the minimum servicing standards and
maintenance  of a fidelity  bond and errors and  omissions  policy  based on our
examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,   on  a  test  basis,  evidence  about  ContiMortgage   Corporation's
compliance  with the  minimum  servicing  standards  and  performing  such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our
examination  provides a reasonable  basis for our opinion.  Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on ContiMortgage Corporation's compliance with
the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion,  management's assertion that ContiMortgage  Corporation complied
with the  aforementioned  minimum  servicing  standards  and that  ContiMortgage
Corporation had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the
amount of  $11,200,000  as of and for the year ended December 31, 1996 is fairly
stated, in all material respects.



                                          /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
 


New York, New York
March 7, 1997


<PAGE>



                                       ContiMortgage
                                    500 Enterprise Road
                                     Horsham, PA 19044
                                       (215) 957-3700





As of and for the year ended December 31, 1996,  ContiMortgage  Corporation  has
complied with the minimum servicing  standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association  of  America's  Uniform  Single  Attestation  Program  for  Mortgage
Bankers. As of and for this same period, ContiMortgage Corporation had in effect
a fidelity bond and errors omissions policy in the amount of $11,200,000.






/s/ Daniel J. Egan                              /s/ Margaret M. Curry
Daniel J. Egan                                  Margaret M. Curry
Sr. Vice President and CFO                      Sr. Vice President




March 7, 1997                                   March 7, 1997
NRO Successfully Launches Last Titan from 

Cape Canaveral

| 29 April 2005 | 

Into the clear night sky, a National Reconnaissance Office payload was successfully launched 

aboard a Titan IV-B rocket from Cape Canaveral AFS, Fla. on Apr. 29 at 8:50p.m. EDT.

After nearly 50 years of launches, this was the 168th and last of the Titan rocket family to be 

launched from the East Coast.

"The entire launch team was exceptional, as always. It was a picture-perfect ending to the great 

Titan era," said Col Chip Zakrzewski, mission director for the launch and the director of the 

Office of Space Launch.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MARCH 23, 2012

JOHN LEY

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 11-11985 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00271-CG-N-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JARVIS ANDERSON, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Southern District of Alabama

 ________________________

(March 23, 2012)

Before BARKETT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
J. Clark Stankoski, appointed counsel for Jarvis Anderson in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.

1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Anderson’s convictions and sentences are

AFFIRMED.

2
. . 

USCIB: 4.2/52 

TOP SE0RER' 

REF ID:A583BO 

10F SECRET 

23 June 1955 

MEMORAND'()1 FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Exception to Provisions of USCIB Directive No. 15. 

Reference: USCIB 4.2/51 dated 21 June 1955. 

Pursuant to the reference, Appendix A to CIBD #15 has been amended 

and is enclosed herewith. The enclosure should be substituted for the 

existing Appendix to that directive. 

Enclosure 

a/s 

USCIB 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 10-21-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

USCIB: 4.2/52 ttkNtlEJ!I VIA 0CMIN'i' 611-ANNmS eNI.Y 

TOP SECRET 

24 
REF ID:A583BO == = ., ,..... ... ,.,. n. "'"" 1 ur ~.C..t;;ttL 1 

APPENDIX A (REVISED) 

TO 

USCIB DIRECTIVE NUMBER 15 (CIBD # 15) 

Currently Approved Exceptions and Limitations to the Lowest Levels of 

Authority. 

A. CATIDORY III COMINT 

1. For these purposes the 5th and 7th Independent Air 

Divisions are considered as Numbered Air Forces. 

(Approved by USCIB on 12 Aug 1954.) 

2. For these p~rposes Joint Air Divisions (Defense) of the 

Continental Air Defense Command are considered as Numbered 

Air Forces. 

(Approved by USCIB on 20 June 1955.) OGA 

B. CATEJORY II CCMINT 

1. For these purposes l .... ________________ J 

limited to those Representatives located at Tokyo, London 

and Frankfort. 

(Approved by USCIB on 12 Aug 1954.) 

2. For these purposes the 5th and 7th Independent Air 

Divisions are considered as Numbered Air Forces. 

(Approved by USCIB on 12 Aug 1954.) 

3. For these purposes Joint Air Divisions (Defense) of the 

Continental Air Defense Command are considered as Numbered 

Air Forces. 

(Approved by USCIB on 20 June 1955.) 

TOP SECRET
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection the Annual Report of CornellCompanies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, James E. Hyman, Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman ofthe Board, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.            The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.            The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ James E. Hyman                                                 |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | James E. Hyman, Chief Executive  Officer and Chairman of the Board |
|   | March 14, 2008                                                |

 

Note:   The certification the registrant furnishesin this exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to theliabilities of that Section. Registration Statements or other documents filed with the Securities andExchange Commission shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference, except asotherwise expressly stated in such filing.

 

----
The Ho norable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for th e 1 Eastern District of Arkansas. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-3877

___________ Rosetta Ricks, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas St. Vincent Infirmary; Jan Thompson, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: May 28, 1997 Filed: July 10, 1997

___________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. RosettaRicks appeals from the final order of the United States District Court 1 for the Eastern District of Arkansas, granti ng St. Vincent Infirmary summary judgment in this employment discrimination act ion. We have carefully reviewed the record, and we affirm on the basis of the district court's opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Mr. Packard intends to spend one entire day visiting the

NRO programs at

TOP SECRET

11113011PMPUI

1St NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON, D.C.

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR March 16, 1971

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. NAKA

COL. SWEENEY

SUBJECT: Mr. Packard's Visit to NRO

AccoMpanying Mr. Packard on this trip will be Dr. Foster,

Mr. Warner, me, Col. Furlong and two or three other personnel,

some of whom may not be NRO cleared. The latter will obviously

be excused for this portion of the trip.

As this will be Mr. Packard's initial trip to the West

Coast I would like to make it as comprehensive an overview as

possible of our activities with emphasis on the hardware. If

ossible I would like to give him a brief-familiarization with

iefings. I would li to re no er

than 22 March.

I think you can safely assume that if we maintain Mr. Packard's

interest that he will be amenable to going til 6 o'clock or so

that evening.

•

John L. McLucas

11W-SECREF

((avers PION MITINIatit 1111111111M6

FIN '1411 WM IIPPIN

:•":•• -.•
•

;',9 K;' :11:::', 2407,poi -06 - .I.P.- 

.. , 

.,.. 

.. „ . 

',:., ' • ,,2, ( gai. . 

5 . 

•••••• • • r.d.5..;,. 

4 N 

fr;:o 

. '• 1 -_f ,. ---: 05,N4.;e5;:l.r...zir !;:!;P:.-..:.!:; .7:1 rkIti,.... *.illillEttt*IttY.i :':' . -,- ' '.''''':','-': 

..: raltriiiikit -,16-a:.i * AFTRACK: Beginnings • 01 VEHICLE CC/4 „L IP/41-10N 

. i ;:':::g4i:42 Requirements forasmall, inexpensivepayloadthatcould 

!Di 

.,..---;•::•.-v k becarried ontheaftrack of theAGENAveh icleresulted fromR:..i 

•

.••.:., 

.. . . . ..., ::r... 

concerns inthelate1950's thatthe Sovietsmighttrytotrack 

,...2x:...1,;,,.... Fin,:t.,:64t 4.e.ei: iar.c!rf..;:i. ,:•./... ' * A," ..® '--- .,:::, - = \.. . ......,. the DISCOVERER (CORONA)vehiclesand eveninterferewith ' 

•

-•:;-:,!:•::•-•‘,,* A1-1 SEC t iON 

giC r-,. theAGENA 's S-band beacon. Thisconceptof aQuickReaction,. I.,•1 j 

Capability(QRC) payload(ligilt,simple,minimal "developrnent 

time)caughtonrapidly. 

'.:lRaf'Sil:',.)::.••',.".::.•'•?-. :::1•A:7,:g11::', '' ''-'-• 

, . 

, ; •• ,,,•• 

, The first AFTRACK ELI NT payload - S TOP, flewaboard the 4=:•,„../-, 'ttolibt,,, 

- ..•••40„,,,, 

' -- ,,,,,,.. -r..- '-, much heralded DISCOVERER XIII,on 10 August 1960 and over 

.,

‘I ,Ift, , 

) ',,,... ' '.. ' - ,, thenext 5 yearsthe AFTRACK faripiiyof SIGINT collectorswas 

,,.....,,% ... 1 "", - Y 

:- 

'•••'.f'.,:, successful incollectingagainstavarietyof differentmilsions. 

30 AFTRACK payloadswid4olorful names like: . Tied to their CORONA-AGENA host these AFTRACK missions 

., . . 

TAKI,blivi '''LT) — BILL, TEXAS PINT,TOpsK GRAREJUICE, NEW jERsEy, ' the earlyyears, toseveral weeks l ikewise lasted fora few daysin h 

PLYMOUTH ROCK VINO, LONG JOHN,HA LOFT,OPPORKNOCKITY, _ in the 1965 timefram4 _ i 

SQUARE TWENTY ,. I 4 •4.19":7-1t!';'i '!,'r!.`...r..6% i__......._._ --------------- _ .. . ._ 

.. 

''.t...7,-- - - -.v..: 

E v._...,-1._..., ..

•

,,,. - ,v7- .0 , 

''''':'!; • SECR ETI/RITTK/JR EL TO USA,AUS, GBR//25X1 

. lk
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1307 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1307

To amend section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, to require that 
   the annual budget submissions of the Presidents include the total 
   dollar amount requested for intelligence or intelligence related 
     activities of each element of the Government engaged in such 
                              activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 12, 2015

   Mr. Wyden introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                referred to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, to require that 
   the annual budget submissions of the Presidents include the total 
   dollar amount requested for intelligence or intelligence related 
     activities of each element of the Government engaged in such 
                              activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Intelligence Budget Transparency Act 
of 2015''.

SEC. 2. FUNDING FOR INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES OF EACH ELEMENT OF THE 
              GOVERNMENT.

    Section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(40)(A) the total dollar amount proposed in the budget 
        for intelligence or intelligence related activities of each 
        element of the Government engaged in such activities in the 
        fiscal year for which the budget is submitted and the estimated 
        appropriation required for each of the ensuing four fiscal 
        years; and
            ``(B) as used in subparagraph (A), the term `element of the 
        Government' refers to each element of the intelligence 
        community as defined in section 3(4) of the National Security 
        Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)).''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1573
MARGARET I. ENDRES, for Joseph Endres (deceased), Petitioner, versus DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (00-624-BLA) Submitted: September 25, 2001 Decided: October 15, 2001 Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. C. Patrick Carrick, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Petitioner. William S. Mattingly, JACKSON & KELLY, P.L.L.C., Morgantown, West Virginia, for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Margaret I. Endres, the widow of Joseph Endres, petitions for review of a decision of the Benefits Review Board (Board) affirming the administrative law judge’s decision to deny her claim for black lung benefits. Our review of the record discloses that the Board’sdecision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Doss v. Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs , 53 F.3d 654, 658 (4th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Endres v. Consolidation Coal Co. , BRB No. 00-624-BLA (B.R.B. Apr. 6, 2001). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.1
 DYNAMEX INC.  2008 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN
   Administration
 Committee
 Committee Authority
 Committee Determination
 -1-




---



##### 



Grants
  Shares Subject to the Plan
 Shares Authorized
 Adjustments
 -2-




---



##### 



Eligibility for Participation
 Eligible Persons
 Selection of Grantees
 Granting of Options
 Number of Shares
 Type of Option and Price
   -3-




---



##### 



Option Term
 Exercisability of Options
 Termination of Employment, Disability or Death
   -4-




---



##### 



-5-




---



##### 



Exercise of Options
 Limits on Incentive Stock Options
 Restricted Stock Grants
  General Requirements
 Number of Shares
 Requirement of Employment
 Restrictions on Transfer and Legend on Stock Certificate
 -6-




---



##### 



Right to Vote and to Receive Dividends
 Lapse of Restrictions
 Stock Appreciation Rights
 General Requirements
 Exercisability
 Value of SARs
 Form of Payment
 -7-




---



##### 



Performance Units
 General Requirements
 Performance Period and Performance Goals
 Payment with respect to Performance Units
 Requirement of Employment
 Qualified Performance-Based Compensation
 Designation as Qualified Performance-Based Compensation
 Performance Goals
 -8-




---



##### 



Establishment of Goals
 Maximum Payment
 Announcement of Grants
 Withholding of Taxes
 Required Withholding
 -9-




---



##### 



Election to Withhold Shares
 Transferability of Grants
 Nontransferability of Grants
 Transfer of Nonqualified Stock Options
 Change of Control of the Company
    -10-




---



##### 



Consequences of a Change of Control
 Notice and Acceleration
 Assumption of Grants
 Other Alternatives
 -11-




---



##### 



Amendment and Termination of the Plan
 Amendment
 Termination of Plan
 Termination and Amendment of Outstanding Grants
 Governing Document
 -12-




---



##### 



Funding of the Plan
  Rights of Participants
  No Fractional Shares
  Miscellaneous
 Grants in Connection with Corporate Transactions and Otherwise
 Compliance with Law
 -13-




---



##### 



Governing Law
 Section 409A
  -14-
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASr1 JULY 2015- 

— F, l-erbREE—

25 October 1965 

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. REBER 

SUBJECT: MOL Inspection Proposal 

In SS-5, we tend to bury ourselves with individual projects for 

several weeks at a time. We are just now coming up for air on 

State's proposal to offer an initiative to the U. S. S. It. on pre -launching inspection of manned satellites. I feel this may be of general 

interest to you in that it is,symptomatic of State's broader desire to 

unlock TKH; exemplifies the blandness with which State makes 

scandalous proposals; and offers an instructive inside look at the 

Department of Defense "at work. " 

9 Sep 65. State invites the usual "Ad Hoc Committee-addressees to a meeting. (Tab 1) 

22 Sep 65. The meeting is held. The State proposal is' so grotesque that there is no possibility of killing it. 

27 Sep 65. Mr. Alvin Friedman (ISA Action Officer) asks me 

to help ISA prepare a draft position paper on the State proposal. 

6 Oct 65. Mr. Garthoff (State) prepares a position paper on 

MOL inspection. This paper is as incredible as the proposal (and 

Garthoff is brilliant!). (Tab 2) 

8 Oct 65. Mr. McNaughton (ASD/ISA) asks the Secretary of 

the Air Force and the Joint Chiefs of Staff to give their comments on 

the State proposal. (Tab 3) 

8 Oct 65. We deliver a response for Mr. Friedman's consideration (Tab 4). The draft was a typical intra-DOD response: 

direct and opinionated. 

12 Oct 65. General Wheeler (JCS) sends his comments on the 

State proposal to Mr. McNamara (Tab 5). He strongly recommends 

that State forget the whole thing. 

via BYEMM 

Control System 

HANDLE VIA TALENTKEYHOLE CHANNELS DORIAN 
15 Oct 65. Dr. Brown comments on the State proposal to 

Mr. McNaughton. He recommends strong opposition to satellite 

pre -launching inspection. (Tab 6) 

23 Oct 65. Mr. McNaughton sends a DOD position paper to 

Ambassador Thompson. The strategy: a soft reply; everything 

needs more careful consideration; perhaps idea is good in principle, 

but some real pitfalls. ISA hopes the wet noodle ploy will cool the 

whole idea. Heivy artillery later, if necessary (Tab 7). The 

technical attachment was prepared by Major Yost. 

As you recognize, the key to this kind of activity is capturing the action, controlling all possible replies, and building on a 

technically (and morally) sound base. Quiggins, Yost, and I work 

very closely on this kind of problem: it's hard to tell where one 

man's effort stops and another starts. 

Now you know what we do. I'd like to show you other examples 

as they develop. I have a hunch we could benefit from the advice of • 

an experienced (ex-State) hand in the business. 

PAUL B. WORTHMAN 

Colonel, USAF 

2 

via BYEiikei HANDLE VIA ULM. DORIAN 

COMI01 %Stem KEYHOIE CHANNELS 

"LI/OP SECRET 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

I t.