alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                 Exhibit 10.8

Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated June 27, 1997, between Registrant and
Alan Chervitz

    This Amendment to Employment Agreement is made as of the 20th day of May,
1999, by and between Alan Chervitz (the "Employee") and Innovasive Devices,
Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the "Company").

1.  The Employee and the Company are parties to an Employment Agreement dated as
    of June 27, 1997 (the "Employment Agreement"). The Employee and the Company
    are also parties to an Income Continuation Agreement date as of April 6th,
    1999 (the "Income Continuation Agreement"). The Employee and the Company
    wish to amend the Employment Agreement and the Income Continuation Agreement
    to avoid certain inconsistencies in the Employment Agreement and the Income
    Continuation Agreement.

2.  The Employee and the Company agree that if the Employee becomes entitled to
    receive Income Continuance Payments (as defined in the Income Continuation
    Agreement) in the circumstances described in Article III of the Income
    Continuation Agreement, the provisions of the Income Continuation Agreement
    shall govern and the employee and the Company will not be subject to the
    provisions of Section 4(a) and 5 of the Employment Agreement. In such an
    event, the payment by the Company of Income Continuation Payments shall be
    deemed to be payments required under Section 5 (I) of the Employment
    Agreement for the purpose of Section 6(a) of the Employment Agreement.

3.  In all other circumstances, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full
    force and effect as written.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this amendment to Employment
Agreement to be executed and delivered as of the day and year first above
written.

   _______________                       INNOVASIVE DEVICES, INC.
    Alan Chervitz

                                           By:
                                           Name:  Richard D. Randall
                                           Title: President and CEO
# C_2004198EN.01000101.xml

| 5.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 August 2004

(2004/C 198/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1983 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,72 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4352 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,65960 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1938 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5394 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 86,33 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4145 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,57940 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,769 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 250,14 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6527 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4245 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4350 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 954 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 240,0100 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,120 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 782 400 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7079 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5844 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3465 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8624 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0667 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 399,08 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,5483 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1983

JPY

Japanese yen

133,72

DKK

Danish krone

7,4352

GBP

Pound sterling

0,65960

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1938

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5394

ISK

Iceland króna

86,33

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4145

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,57940

CZK

Czech koruna

31,769

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

250,14

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6527

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4245

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4350

ROL

Romanian leu

40 954

SIT

Slovenian tolar

240,0100

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,120

TRL

Turkish lira

1 782 400

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7079

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5844

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3465

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8624

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0667

KRW

South Korean won

1 399,08

ZAR

South African rand

7,5483

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND THE STATEMENT OF EARNINGS OF CARVER BANCORP, INC. FOR THE PERIOD AT
AND ENDING MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      11,120,748
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         266,390
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            10,200,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 29,918,137
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      66,584,447
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        65,693,568
<LOANS>                                    270,521,851
<ALLOWANCE>                                  4,020,099
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             416,482,844
<DEPOSITS>                                 276,999,074
<SHORT-TERM>                               101,045,466
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          6,154,714
<LONG-TERM>                                    992,619
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,144
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,267,826
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             416,482,844
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             20,576,506
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            5,430,638
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             1,800,738
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            28,473,426
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           8,421,226
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          14,814,683
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       13,658,743
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                4,231,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               3,948
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             17,963,020
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,952,117)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,452,750)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.02)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.11
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,417,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 3,920,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,085,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                3,431,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    82,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            4,020,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         4,020,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
file:///CI/windows/TEMP/attl.hln Iwant to share with you my impressions on two issues discussed today during the hearing. I.Computer room ACs. Itappears that CEC was mostly concerned about this equipment being covered, did not worry much about technical aspects, and considered pressing the ASHRAE 90.1-specified ARI standards as the most probable method to accomplish their goal. Ithinkthat now CEC will propose using Std. ASHRAE 127 and suggest establishment of equivalents EER levels for equipment to be tested by Std. ASHRAE 127. Technically, this isacorrect approach. II.Water-source HPs. 1. Timetable: Ifall goes well with ASHRAE 90.1 Appendix U(about which we learned today), ASHRAE Standard Committee will meet on October 14 and 15 and will be ableto approve it,and (Ibelieve) ASHRAE Technology Council and Board of Directors will approve during the ASHRAE Winter meeting at the end ifJanuary 2001. Also, there isashort period time allowed for appeal. Iam on ASHRAE's Standard Committee and will attend the 11/14-15 meeting. 2. The data ARI provided inJune 1999 during the DOE/ARI/NIST meeting at NIST showed that asimple correlation between EER/ARI-320 and EER/ISO does not exist. Don Ellis confirmed this today. The scatter was from +12% to 8%. Ed will have to figure out what to do with this cake, because either now or one year later we will be confronted with the issue of rationalizing the minimum EER. (Ido not know where this +12%
- -8% scatter iscoming from; itshould be smaller considering the table Don Ellis presented today.) 3. Iagree that getting test data from an independent lab and/or NIST isessential as a part of DOE's homework on this issue. 4. Iexplained tothe ARI folks thatthe data we received from them on particular units do not count as an official submittal to DOE inthis rule making process. 5. Iunderstand that ARI would be pleased ifthey were allowed to test bythe ISO procedure and derive the ARI/320 rating, but Ido not know legal aspects of such asolution. iOverall, all went well.

Piotr

Piotr A. Domanski National Institute ofStandards and Technology 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8631 Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8631 USA tel:(301)975-5877 fax:(301)208-0485 e-mail: Piotr.Domanski@NIST.gov http://www.bfrl.nist.gov/863/refrig.html

I of1 9/21/00 5:11 PN
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

     Oxboro Medical Announces Closing of Sale of its Outdoors Subsidiary

MINNEAPOLIS, June 30, 1999 Oxboro Medical International Inc., Minneapolis, MN
(NASDAQ: OMED) announced today that it had completed the sale of its Oxboro
Outdoors Inc. subsidiary ("Outdoors") to a group of private investors. For
its 2nd fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1999, sales of Outdoors' products
accounted for approximately 14% of the Company's $1,387,916 total sales.

The sale price was $650,000, partially in the form of cash and partially as a
note, subject to certain adjustments within 90 days.

As previously reported, Matthew E. Bellin, President of Oxboro Medical
International Inc., stated: "The sale of our Outdoors subsidiary will allow
the Company to focus its financial and human resources on our medical
products business."

John McGuire, one of the private investors, stated that he and his investment
group were very excited about the long term growth opportunities of Oxboro
Outdoors. He said that Oxboro Outdoors expects to continue to sell a full
range of licensed specialty products as well as unlicensed fishing and other
sports products.

Oxboro Medical International Inc. develops, assembles, and markets medical
and surgical products.  Previously, through its wholly-owned Outdoors
subsidiary it developed, assembled, and marketed fishing tackle and outdoor
recreational licensed products.

Forward-looking Statements

The Company may from time to time make written or oral "forward-looking
statements", whether in its news releases, its filings with the SEC or in its
reports to stockholders, or elsewhere. By their very nature, forward-looking
statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties relating
to the Company's future performance that may cause the actual results,
performance or achievements of the Company, or industry results, to differ
materially from those expressed or implied in any such "forward-looking
statements". Investors are cautioned that any such forward-looking statement
is qualified by and subject to the warnings and cautionary statements
contained above and in the Company's filings with the SEC. The Company does
not undertake and assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking
statement that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of the Company.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

Matthew E. Bellin, President
Oxboro Medical International, Inc.
612-755-9516 telephone
612-755-9466 fax
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114972 

SBCRE'f' SPECIAL ACCESS REQUIRED/Program 417 

11111111H11111ai~1n11111.111mu1 

August 13, 1969 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 

SUBJECT: Program Number Change 

On August 6, I called Lt Col Gregory, AFRDS, to request 

the status of a proposed number change for Program 417. 

Lt Col Gregory visited me later on the same day and 

provided the new number: 554. This number has not yet been 

implemented; Lt Col Gregory will contact us when the number 

is in effect. 

Si:CRE'f~PECIAL ACCESS REQUIRED/Program H7 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114972
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6262

THOMAS M. FAIR, JR., also known as Thomas Marvin Fair, also 

known as Thomas Marvin Fair, Jr.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BRIAN P. STIRLING, Director of the South Carolina Department 

of Corrections; MICHAEL MCCALL, Division Director of 

Operations at the South Carolina Department of Corrections; 

DENNIS BUSH; JAMES SLIGH; PREA COMMITTEE MEMBERS; R. HILTON; 

WILLIE DAVIS; THOMAS COMMANDER; STEVEN NOLAN, individually and

in his/her official capacities,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. Richard Mark Gergel, District 

Judge. (6:14-cv-04882-RMG)

Submitted: July 21, 2015 Decided: July 23, 2015

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Marvin Fair, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Marvin Fair, Jr., appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Fair v. Stirling,

No. 6:14-cv-04882-RMG (D.S.C. Feb. 4, 2015). We deny Fair’s motion 

for appointment of counsel, and we dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.1SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE                                           Stock      All                  Awards,  Non-Equity  Other                  Including  Incentive  Compensation    Name and Principal Position Year  Salary  Bonus  Warrants  Compensation  (a)  Total Nicholas J. Malino, Chief  2007  $90,000  $0  $0  $0  $0  $90,000 Executive Officer (1)  2006   180,000   0   121,000   0   0   301,000 Steve Onody. Chief  2007   12,000   0   100,000   0   0   112,000 Operating Officer (4)  2006   0   0   0   0   0   0 Ron Brewer, Chief Operating  2007   0   0   0   0   0   0 Officer (2)  2006   110,000   0   0   0   0   110,000 Craig McMahon, V.P. of  2007   66,000   0   0   0   0   66,000 Operations (3)  2006   132,000   0   0   0   0   132,000 There were no stock option awards or nonqualified deferred compensation earnings during the periodsand the company has no pension plan. Therefore, these columns are not applicable and have beenomitted from the above table.(a) There were no perquisites or other personal benefits provided to these employees that exceeded$10,000 in the aggregate, and there were no company contributions to any defined contributionplans, life insurance premiums paid by the company for the benefit of the employee or othercompensation.(1) Mr. Malino receives an annual salary of $180,000. See “Employee Agreements”. In August 2005,Mr. Malino received a stock award whereby he would receive 1,850,000 shares of common stock ofAmerex, which were issued in 2006. Vesting occurred immediately. The fair value of the Company’sstock at the time of the award was minimal, since operations had not commenced and assets owned atthat time were insignificant. In 2006, Mr. Malino received, from a related party, warrants topurchase 1,979,700 shares of the Company’s common stock for $0.50 per share with a five-year term.The warrants were valued at $121,000 using a Black-Scholes model.(2) Mr. Brewer voluntarily resigned from the company on December 1, 2006. See Form 8-K filedDecember 4, 2006. In August 2005, Mr. Brewer received a stock award whereby he would receive4,450,000 shares of common stock of Amerex, which were issued in 2006. Vesting occurredimmediately. The fair value of the Company’s stock at the time of the award was minimal, sinceoperations had not commenced and assets owned at that time were insignificant.(3) Mr. McMahon receives an annual salary of $132,000. See “Employment Agreements.” In January2006, Mr. McMahon received a stock award whereby he would receive 160,000 shares of common stock ofAmerex, which were subsequently issued in 2006.(4) Mr. Onody receives an annual salary of $144,000. In June 2007, Mr. Onody received stockoptions for 50,000 shares of common stock.
**EXHIBIT 10.10**

 

**CNET Networks, Inc.**

**Director Compensation Plan**

 

Adopted by the Board of Directors 

June 10, 2003 

 

**Plan Objective**

 

The CNET Networks, Inc. Director Compensation Plan 2003 Incentive Plan is designed to attract and retain board members who possess the highest qualifications, integrityand independence and to compensate them appropriately for their services. 

 

**Eligibility**

 

The Plan is available to members of theCNET Networks Board of Directors who are not employees of the Company. 

 

**Effective Date of the Plan**

 

The Plan is in effect formeetings after June 10, 2003 and shall remain in effect until repealed by the Board of Directors and supercedes any prior plan. 

 

**Plan Administration**

 

The Governance Committee is responsible for administering the Plan in its sole discretion and judgment. 

 

**Annual Cash Retainer**

 

Each member of the Board of Directors shall receive an annual retainer of $12,000 payable in cash in equal installments on a quarterly basis within thirty days followingthe end of the quarter. Payments shall be pro-rated to reflect service for periods of less than a full quarter. In the event of a director’s resignation or removal, a pro rated payment shall be made within thirty days of termination of service.

 

The Chair of the Audit Committee shall receive an annual retainer of $5,000and the Chair of each other committee shall receive an annual retainer of $2,500, payable in the same manner as the board retainer. 

 

**Meeting Fees**

 

Each member of the Board of Directors and of each committee shall receive a fee equal to $2,500 for each board or committee meeting attended in person and $500 for each meeting attended by telephone, provided that nofees shall be paid with respect to committee meetings held on the same day as board meetings. Meeting fees shall be paid within thirty days of the end of each quarter for all meetings held during the quarter. 

**Option Grants**

 

Each director shall be entitled to an annual option grant in the amount of 15,000 shares. The grant shall be made in conjunction with the annual company-wide grant to allemployees pursuant to the same form of agreement used for director grants prior to the adoption of this Plan. 

 

In addition, upon joining the board, a member shall be entitled to receive an option grant in the amount of 40,000 options pursuant to the same form of agreement used for director grants prior to the adoption of thisPlan. 

 

If there are changes to the accounting treatment of options or to theform of equity compensation applicable to employees of the company in general, the Board of Directors will review the continued appropriateness of these option grants and will consider alternatives. 

 

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                            2152
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    34877
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      30263
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 69992
<PP&E>                                          241498
<DEPRECIATION>                                  123340
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  193746
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            33308
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           508
<OTHER-SE>                                       86311
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    193746
<SALES>                                         158670
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                158219
<CGS>                                           135521
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   145190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   9829
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3952
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               5877
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      5877
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.16
        

</TABLE>
FOR: AFOCE-CS
s WDFZ-25-7-8 , 252357Z JUL 60

Reference your Confédenttal- AFOCE-CS 70567 .
Following information is submitted relative to proposed Point

Arguello launch complex nr.2,

GGG 5 gL OO W (Wh

A(OX¥J Sane soot Tees
Wy A \\\

(E) Additive costs for Hondo Canyon site are due to
additional work not required if complex is sited adjacent to complex
nr 1, including additional site development work, access road, water
supply system, electric supply system, standby electric generator pland,
technical support building.

(F) 18 months time required to design and construct from
date of site approval. ,

(@) . Estimates are based on configuration of existing pads

Bt Foint Arguello complex nr 1 and upon utilization of existing mod II
Guidance, .

BD
F
|
r
+
¥

id this date at 1500 with General Wilson, General :‘S:
ztin present to discuss the matter of CIA-STL
AMOS program. .

described the situation wherein the Air Force was .

astically change its SAMOS management by DOD © ~’
, being told that unlese we do, we will lose participa- .

3. General Strong clearly made the point that the CIA thought {t would: -_

‘be.a mistake to.take the management away from the USAF and that thé ° .
CIA was not advocating this. : ,

- 4. With regard to whether the CIA had a coatract with STL on this prograst

Gen Strong said that they had quer {ed all parts oi the CLA and no such”
‘arrangement with STL had been made by any CIA group.

a General Strong mentioned that Aerospace Corporation (Dr. Getting) **

t throu Dr. -Fubini (who Dr. Getting has asked to assist hi

) to assist Dr. Fubiai in his review. Gen. Strong indicated the

CIA was reluctant to do this at this time since it might influence the
management dediston matter now being examined by Dr, Kistiakowsky.
#### Nicolaus, by guardian *ad litem,*Respondent, vs. Thompson’s, Inc., Appellant.

For the appellant: *Rubin, Zabel & Rouiller,*attorneys, and *Nathan Ruppa,*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Salen & Brenner*of Waukesha.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.