alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
I, Alan H. Buckey, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of LCA-Vision Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date:May 3, 2004 /s/ Alan H. Buckey   Alan H. Buckey
EXHIBIT 12.1


                            Section 906 Certification

         The certification set forth below is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification is not to
be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and does not
constitute a part of the Annual Report on Form 20-F (the "Report") to which this
certification is being filed as an exhibit.

         Ramon Monell Valls, the Chief Executive Officer and Salvador Milan
Alcaraz, the Chief Financial Officer of Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, Chile
S.A., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

          1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, Chile S.A.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Banco Bilbao
Vizcaya Argentaria, Chile S.A. and will be retained by Banco Bilbao Vizcaya
Argentaria, Chile S.A. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


                                                  /s/ Ramon Monell V.
                                               ---------------------------
                                                   Ramon Monell V.
                                               Chief Executive Officer


                                                 /s/ Salvador Milan A.
                                               ---------------------------
                                                  Salvador Milan A.
                                               Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1319 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1319

 To validate final patent number 27-2005-0081, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 2015

  Mr. Heller introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To validate final patent number 27-2005-0081, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINAL PATENT AND LAND RECONFIGURATION IN CLARK COUNTY AND 
              LINCOLN COUNTY, NEVADA.

    (a) In General.--Patent number 27-2005-0081 and the associated land 
reconfiguration issued by the Bureau of Land Management on February 18, 
2005, as depicted on the map prepared by the Bureau of Land Management 
entitled ``Lincoln County Land Patent'' and dated December 4, 2014, is 
affirmed and validated as having been issued pursuant to, and in 
compliance with, the Nevada-Florida Land Exchange Authorization Act of 
1988 (Public Law 100-275; 102 Stat. 52), the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), and the Federal Land 
Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) for the 
benefit of the desert tortoise, other species, and the habitat of the 
desert tortoise and other species to increase the likelihood of the 
recovery of the desert tortoise and other species.
    (b) Issuance of Lincoln County Patent.--
            (1) In general.--The Director of the Bureau of Land 
        Management may issue a patent for 7,548 acres of land in 
        Lincoln County, Nevada, that is--
                    (A) depicted on the map described in subsection 
                (a); and
                    (B) described in the legal description of the 
                proposed lease and fee land on file in the Ely District 
                Office of the Bureau of Land Management.
            (2) Applicable law.--A patent issued under paragraph (1) 
        shall be considered to have been issued pursuant to, and in 
        compliance with, the Nevada-Florida Land Exchange Authorization 
        Act of 1988 (Public Law 100-275; 102 Stat. 52).
    (c) Ratification of Reconfiguration.--The process used by the 
United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the Bureau of Land 
Management in reconfiguring the land described in subsection (a), as 
depicted on Exhibit 1-4 of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for 
the Planned Development Project MSHCP, Lincoln County, NV (FWS-R8-ES-
2008-N0136) and the reconfiguration provided for in Special Condition 
10 of Army Corps of Engineers Permit No. 200125042 are ratified.
                                 <all>
```
# Guide to Pronouncing Taxonomic Terms

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Guide to Pronouncing Taxonomic Terms 

This guide presents a list of terms (in alphabetical order) that are used in Soil Taxonomy along with other terms used to describe soils. 

This list is not comprehensive but does include many commonly used terms. Included with each term are its origin, a respelling of the word for the purpose of pronunciation followed by the phonetic spelling in parentheses, an alternate pronunciation (if one exists), and an audio file of a narrator pronouncing the term.

The terms included in the list are: all of the soil orders, soil moisture regimes, and temperature regime names; most terms used at the soil family level of classification; the names of most diagnostic horizons and features; and selected other terms commonly found in soil survey information. Definitions of the terms are not included in this guide.

**If the audio links are broken, download the Excel file.**

Guide to taxonomic terms(8.7 MB)

## Recommended Citation

*Soil Survey Staff. 2020. Guide to Pronouncing Terms Used in Soil Taxonomy and Soil Survey. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, Nebraska.*

##   Related Content

### Soil Taxonomy

The second edition of *Soil Taxonomy, A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys* is the result of the collective experience and contributions of thousands of pedologists from around the world.
Learn More

### Keys to Soil Taxonomy

Taxonomic keys for field classification.
Learn More

### The Twelve Orders of Soil Taxonomy

Descriptions and distribution maps of the twelve soil orders.
Learn More

##   Contact Soils

Please contact us if you see something that needs to be updated, if you have any questions, or if you need accessibility assistance.
                  -    Soils Webmaster 
                  -    402-437-5499 
                  -    Soils-Webmaster@usda.gov 

## Find Your Local Service Center

    USDA Service Centers are locations where you can connect with Farm Service Agency, Natural Resources Conservation Service, or Rural Development employees for your business needs. Enter your state and county below to find your local service center and agency offices. If this locator does not work in your browser, please visit offices.usda.gov.
**NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM**August 2023

****
Underground Outlet (620)

Critical Area Planting (342)

Grassed Waterway (412)

Mulching (484)

Residue & Tillage Management, Reduced Till (345)

Cover Crop (340)

Conservation Crop Rotation (328)

Pest Management Conservation System (595)

Nutrient Management (590)

Filter Strip (393)

Residue & Tillage Management, No Till (329)

Start

**LEGEND**

#.  Created by practice

D.  Direct effect

I.  Indirect effect

C.  Cumulative effect

Mitigating practice

Pathway

Associated practice

D.6 (+) Surface erosion, runoff, and sediment production

Critical Area Planting (342)

I.15 (+) Growth of desirable vegetation

I.16 (+) Soil Stabilized

Note:  

Effects are qualified with a plus (+) or minus (-). These symbols indicate only an increase (+) or a decrease (-) in the effect upon the resource, not whether the effect is beneficial or adverse.

I.14 (+) Net  return to producer

C.1 (+/-) Aquatic habitat in the watershed

I.5 (-) Sediment- borne contaminants to receiving waters

C.2 (+/-) Public/private health and safety

I.13 (+) Air quality

C.3 (+/-) Income and income stability (individuals and community)

I.4 (+) Water quality 

D.4 (+) Cost of installation and maintenance

I.6 (-) Down-slope deposition

I.7 (-) Cost of offsite sediment removal

I.11 (-)  Equipment operating (fuel), maintenance, replacement costs, and labor costs

**Water and Sediment Control Basin (638)**

I.9 (+) Potential crop production

2. Underground outlet

****

1. Earthen embankment

I.10 (+) Potential income

I.12 (-) Greenhouse gases

3. Disturbed areas

I.8 (+) Cropable acreage

D.2 (+) Trapped sediment

I.2 (-) Flooding

I.3 (-) Ephemeral gully and streambank erosion

I.1 (-) Peak runoff, velocity

*Initial setting: On farmland where gully erosion is causing damage to the field, other resources or improvements*

D.1 (+) Impounded water

D.5 (+) Waterborne contaminants to receiving waters

D.3 (-) Gully erosion
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certificate of Principal Executive Officer

pursuant to section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of CNET Networks, Inc. (CNET
Networks) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report), I, Neil M. Ashe, Chief Executive Officer and Director of CNET Networks, Inc., certify pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CNET Networks.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 28, 2007



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ NEIL M. ASHE                    
|Neil M. Ashe                        
|Chief Executive Officer and Director

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CNET Networks and
will be retained by CNET Networks and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

HomeHistoryCryptologic HistoryHistorical FiguresHistorical Figures View

# NSA Historical Figures

                Download            

# Maureen Baginski

Maureen Baginski began her cryptologic career as a Russian Language instructor in 1979. During her tenure, Ms. Baginski held various operational management positions, including a tour as a Senior Operations Officer in the National Security Operations Center and the Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) National Intelligence Officer for Russia.

Ms. Baginski held the position of Signals Intelligence Director during the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001. She directed the Extended SIGINT Enterprise during this time to acquire, produce, and disseminate foreign SIGINT to a wide variety of government and military customers. She interacted with the Executive Branch, members of the Intelligence Community, and worldwide SIGINT partners providing crucial information during a critical time. She left NSA to take a senior position at the Federal Bureau of Investigation. 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Biographyhistorical figureMaureen Baginskiwomen in cryptology
#### Wm. H. Devos & Company, Inc., Respondent, vs. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Company, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Shaw, Muskat & Sullivan,*attorneys, and *John S. Barry,*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *McGovern, Lyons, Curtis, Devos & Reiss*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
Promissory Note-J H Realty, dated December 31, 2007



 Exhibit 10.6 
 PROMISSORY NOTE 
 Spheric Technologies, Inc. agrees to pay to J H Realty the amount of $62,000.00
upon demand after March 31, 2008 for value received with no interest noted. This amount has been created by accruing rent in the amount of $48,000.00 due to Spheric Technologies during calendar year 2006 and 2007, and for including a prior note
for $14,000.00 due to the same entity into this debt instrument. This liability is to be paid in US dollars or equivalent and should be considered a general obligation of the Company. 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Michael Kirksey

		 	Michael Kirksey
	Its:	 	Vice President
	Date:	 	December 31, 2007
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7117

RONALD JERRY SAWYER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EDWARD MURRAY; R. A. YOUNG; LARRY HUFFMAN;

WARDEN OSBORNE; G. D. JOHNSON; CORRECTIONAL

OFFICER RUSSELL; BOB STAMPER, Sergeant; LONNIE

SAUNDERS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HUMPHRIES;

V. V. GRANT; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WARNER; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MINTER; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER

WAGNER; LIEUTENANT DOSS; JOHNNIE RUSSELL; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SHEFFY; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER

CREGGAR; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BLEVINS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District

Judge. (CA-94-389-R)

Submitted: November 16, 1995 Decided: January 29, 1996

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Ronald Jerry Sawyer, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* We deny Appellant's motions for appointment of counsel,

"Motion for Award of Expenses of Motion on Appeal," "Motion to

Amend Injunction Into a 42 U.S.C. [§] 1983 [1988] Complaint with

Relief Prayer At Conclusion of Claims," "Motion for Relief of Order

Due to Mistake," motion for sanctions, and motion for default

judgment.

3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying his

motions for sanctions and default judgment. He also appeals from

the denial of his motion to vacate the court's orders denying appointment of counsel, petition for habeas corpus ad testificandum,

and various default motions. We dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291

(1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral

order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory.* We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1274 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1274

   To amend the National Energy Conservation Policy Act to authorize 
Federal agencies to enter into long-term contracts for the acquisition 
                               of energy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 11, 2015

  Ms. Hirono introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the National Energy Conservation Policy Act to authorize 
Federal agencies to enter into long-term contracts for the acquisition 
                               of energy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONTRACTS FOR FEDERAL PURCHASES OF ENERGY.

    Part 3 of title V of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act is 
amended by adding after section 553 (42 U.S.C. 8259b) the following:

``SEC. 554. LONG-TERM CONTRACTS FOR ENERGY.

    ``(a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 501(b)(1)(B) of title 
40, United States Code, a contract for the acquisition of renewable 
energy or energy from cogeneration facilities for the Federal 
Government may be made for a period not to exceed 30 years.
    ``(b) Standardized Energy Purchase Agreement.--Not later than 90 
days after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary, acting 
through the Federal Energy Management Program, shall publish a 
standardized energy purchase agreement setting forth commercial terms 
and conditions that agencies may use to acquire renewable energy or 
energy from cogeneration facilities.
    ``(c) Technical Assistance.--The Secretary shall provide technical 
assistance to assist agencies in implementing this section.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2005093EN.01001801.xml

| 16.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/18

---

Action brought on 18 February 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Italian Republic

(Case C-84/05)

(2005/C 93/32)

Language of the case: Italian

An action against the Italian Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 18 February 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by M. Konstantinidis and A. Aresu, members of its legal service, acting as Agents.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing, hitherto, to adopt the legislation necessary to apply Council Directive 96/61/EC (1) of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control, to new installations, has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 21(1) thereof; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing, hitherto, to adopt the legislation necessary to apply Council Directive 96/61/EC (1) of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control, to new installations, has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 21(1) thereof;

1

| 2. | order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for the transposition of the directive expired on 30 October 1999.

---

(1)  OJ L 257 of 10. 10. 1996, p. 26.

1

---