alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.6


                              AMENDMENT NO. 2000-I
                                       TO
                     CERTIFIED GROCERS OF CALIFORNIA, LTD.
                      EXECUTIVE SALARY PROTECTION PLAN II


          Certified Grocers of California,  Ltd.,  pursuant to the power granted
to it by Section 7.1 of the Certified  Grocers of  California,  Ltd.,  Executive
Salary  Protection  Plan II (the  "Plan"),  hereby  amends the Plan, as follows,
effective as of January 1, 2000:

1.   The Preamble is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

          This agreement  executed by Certified  Grocers of California,  Ltd., a
     corporation organized under the laws of the State of California,  evidences
     the terms of the Unified Western Grocers  Executive Salary  Protection Plan
     II, formerly known as the Certified Grocers of California,  Ltd., Executive
     Salary Protection Plan II ("Plan") that is effective December 1, 1994.


2.   Section 1.1 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

     The Plan  evidenced  by the  terms  hereof  shall be known as the  "Unified
     Western Grocers, Inc., Executive Salary Protection Plan II."


3.   Section 2.11 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

     The  "Retirement  Plan" shall mean the  Retirement  Plan for  Employees  of
     Certified  Grocers of California,  Ltd. and United  Grocers,  Inc.  Defined
     Benefit Pension Plan.


4.   Section 2.4 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

     The "Company:  shall mean Unified Western Grocers,  Inc., formerly known as
     Certified  Grocers of  California,  Ltd.,  any  corporation  following  the
     Company's written approval which subsequently adopts the Plan as a whole or
     as to one or more of its  divisions,  and any successor  corporation  which
     continues the Plan.


5.   Section 2.8 is amended in its entirely to read as follows:

     The "Plan" shall mean the Unified Western Grocers,  Inc.,  Executive Salary
     Protection Plan II, formerly known as Certified Grocers of California Ltd.,
     Executive Salary Protection Plan, originally effective December 1, 1994.
<PAGE>

     The Company has caused this  Amendment to be signed by its duly  authorized
     officer as of the date written be1ow.


                      Unified Western Grocers, Inc.
                      Formerly known as Certified Grocers of California, Ltd.

                      By:   /s/ Robert M. Ling, Jr.
                            _______________________________

                      Its:  Executive Vice President
                            General Counsel
                            _______________________________

                      Date: April 20, 2000
                            _______________________________
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of MRV Communications, Inc. ("MRV") on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer (principal financial
officer) of MRV, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:



Date: March 16, 2010

/s/ CHRIS KING Chris King Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William A. McDonnell, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AMF Bowling Worldwide, Inc., certify
that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 2, 2006 of AMF Bowling Worldwide, Inc.;
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 2, 2007



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ William A. McDonnell                  
|William A. McDonnell                      
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.1


                                AMENDMENT #2 TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         Pursuant to a Resolution of the Board of Directors of Voice Control
Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Company"), the Employment Agreement
dated June 18, 1993 between Dr. Thomas B. Schalk ("Employee") and the Company,
which was modified by Amendment #1 on July 20, 1995, collectively referred to
as the "Agreement" is hereby amended effective the 15th day of February, 1997
as follows.

         ARTICLE I of the Agreement shall be replaced in its entirety with the
following:

                                   ARTICLE I

                               Term of Employment

         Subject to the provisions hereof, the term of Employee's employment by
Company under this Agreement shall extend through June 18, 1998; provided,
however, that the term of employment shall be extended for an additional
one-year period unless, on or prior to the date thirty calendar days prior to
the end of such period either Company or Employee shall give notice to the
other of an intention to terminate this Agreement, in which case the term of
employment shall comprise only the original period.


Section 3.01.A and 3.02.A of the Agreement shall be replaced with the
following:

         3.01.A In lieu of the provisions of 3.0.1, from and after May 1, 1996,
as compensation for services rendered under the Agreement, Company shall pay
Employee a salary of one hundred fifty-five thousand dollars ($155,000) per
year, payable, less applicable FICA and withholding taxes, in semi-monthly
installments. Such salary shall be reviewed annually by the CEO or COO and
approved by the Board of Directors, after which review the salary may be raised
but not lowered.

         3.02.A In lieu of the provisions of 3.0.2, from and after May 1, 1996,
Employee shall be eligible to receive a bonus of up to five thousand dollars
($5,000) per calendar quarter, less applicable FICA and withholding taxes. The
dollar amount of the bonus shall be determined at the sole discretion of the
CEO or COO based upon exceptional achievements during the quarter.

EMPLOYEE:                                 COMPANY:


/s/ THOMAS B. SCHALK                      /s/ PETER J. FOSTER
-------------------------                 --------------------------
                                          By Its President & CEO, Pursuant to a
                                          Resolution of the Board of Directors
• 

ro1 n~~A5850" uor•! ..... "" ............. 

USCIB: 4.2/23 

26 July 1954 

'!0P SEeRET: 

MEMORANDUM FOR 'lHE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: USCIB Directive Number 6 (CIBD #6). 

1. For the convenience of the members, the revised version 

of USCIB Directive Number 6 (CIBD #6), approved by USCIB as of 

4 February- 1954, is circulated as the enclosure hereto. 

Enclosure 

a/s 

USCIB: 4.2/23 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-11-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

TtJ"P SECRET 

24 
e ro-r~¥f:ASasoft 

USCIB DIREcTIVE NUMBER 6 (CIBD #6) 

(Approved by USCIB on 11 March 1949) 

(Revised as of 4 February 1954) 

INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PROTECTION OF 

CCMINT" CODEWORDS 

1. Regulations for the dissemination, handling and safeguarding 

of CClUNT. will: 

a. Refer to the COMINT codewords only genericall;r, and will 

not list specific codewords. These regulations will be so drafted 

that they will not themselves require designation by a CCJ.:1INT. codeword, and will thus avoid such designation. 

b. Clearly provide for the continuous safeguarding and security of superseded CClo1INT codewords, and material covered by them, 

as well as of current ones. 

2. Knowledge of specific current and non-current CCMINT codewords 

will be disseminated by each member organization in accordance with the 

basic security regulations and to the extent necessary to insure compliance with these regulations, and in a manner appropriate to that organization's a,dministrative arrangements and procedures. 

Enclosure with USCIB 4.2/23 dtd 26 July 1954. 

TOP SECRET
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.AA



                               THIRD AMENDMENT TO
                             PLAINS RESOURCES INC.
                           1992 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

     Plains Resources Inc., having heretofore adopted the Plains Resources Inc.
1992 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), as amended by that certain First
Amendment to the Plan dated February 6, 1997 and the Second Amendment to the
Plan dated May 22, 1997, and having reserved the right under Section 9 thereof
to amend the Plan, does hereby amend the Plan, effective as of May 21, 1998, as
follows:

     Article 8 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding a new Section 8.3 to the
     end of said Article 8 which reads as follows:

          8.3   Awards in Lieu of Annual Retainers.  Each Non-employee Director
     shall have the right to make an annual election to receive Shares (a
     "Retainer Election") in lieu of all or a portion of an annual retainer for
     Board service (the "Annual Retainer"). Such Retainer Election may be made
     for the full amount of the Annual Retainer or in increments equal to the
     number of regular Board Meetings scheduled for the Election Year (as
     defined below).

          (a)   Retainer Election.   A Non-employee Director may make a Retainer
     Election on or before each annual stockholders meeting by written notice to
     the Secretary of the Company specifying the amount of the Annual Retainer
     (all or in increments set forth above) for which the Retainer Election is
     being made.  Such Retainer Election remains in effect for a one-year period
     beginning on the day of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders at which such
     Non-employee Director is elected or re-elected to the Board and ending on
     the day before the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Election
     Year").  Provided however, a Non-employee Director who is elected or
     appointed to the Board at a time other than at the Annual Meeting of
     Stockholders may make a Retainer Election by written notice to the
     Secretary of the Company within ten (10) days after the date his term
     begins and such election shall remain in effect for the remainder of the
     Election Year.

          (b)   Issuance of Shares.   After each regular Board meeting of an
     Election Year, the Company shall award to each Non-employee Director who
     made a Retainer Election applicable to such meeting, a number of Shares
     (rounded to the nearest 
<PAGE>
 
     whole Share) determined by dividing (i) the incremental amount of the
     Annual Retainer payable on the date of such meeting by (ii) the Fair Market
     Value of a Share on the date of such meeting. Certificates for the Shares
     awarded shall be issued to the recipient as soon as practicable and
     thereupon the recipient shall have full voting, dividend and other
     ownership rights with respect to such Shares.


Adopted by the Board of Directors of Plains Resources Inc. on May 21, 1998.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-10-00043- CR NO. 03-10-00044- CR F rancisco Her nand ez, A ppellan t

v. The State of Texas, App ellee F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 299 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT

NOS . D-1 -DC- 05- 3019 80 & D-1 -DC- 07- 2015 19 HO NORAB LE CHARLES F . B AIRD, JUDGE P RESIDING M E M O R A ND U M O PI N I O N Fr ancisc o Her

nandez seeks to appea l judgme nts of convict i o n for possession of a controlled substance. The trial court has cer tified that Her

nandez waived the right of appea l in both cause s. The appe als are dismiss ed. See Tex. R. App. P . 25.2(d).

__________________________________________ J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief Justice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Waldrop Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: F ebrua

ry 26, 2010 Do Not Publish
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 19-0678

SUNSET IRRIGATION DISTRICTK CAROLYN R.

MACK AND CHRISS A. MACK, 

 Claimants and Appellees, 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (FISH AND WILDLIFE

SERVICE); GLENDA F. ANDERSON; JIMMY A. ANDERSON;

JOHN ANDERSON; ROWDY ANDERSON, 

 Objectors and Appellants. 

ORDER

UPON MOTION of the Objectors, with no objection from the Claimants, 

and with good cause appearing;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for the filing of Objector’s

Brief is extended, with the new deadline for filing being July 15, 2020. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 10 2020

04/10/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0678
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-76-2014]

On October 20, 2014, Epson Portland, Inc. (EPI) submitted a notification of proposed revision to existing production authority to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board for EPI's facility in Hillsboro, Oregon, within Subzone 45F.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (79 FR 64168-64169, 10-28-2014). The FTZ Board has determined that no further review of the proposed revision to the scope of production authority is warranted at this time. The proposed revision described in the notification is authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: February 19, 2015.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-03895 Filed 2-24-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
AFS-10-375-E Sep 28 2010

Exemption No. 10146 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0836

Mr. George Smith

President Flight Training International, Inc. 3401 Quebec Street, Suite 9150 Denver, CO 80207

Dear Mr. Smith:

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our decision and explains its basis.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated August 12, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Flight Training International, In c. (FTI), for an exemption from § 142.53(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow FTI to use an alternative means of compliance consisting of simulator-based, approved line-oriented flight training in a simulator representative of the type of aircraft in which instruction will be given.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to FTI.

The FAA issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No. 7418 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that the intent of § 142.53(b) is to expose instructors to the actual flying environment, including realistic noise and sound, air traffi c phraseology, procedures, and terminology, and airport signage and lighting. The FAA also found that by observing factors in a real environment, instructors also hear and derive situational awareness from other pilot reports and responses, including those delivered by short slang and incorrect phraseology that nonetheless have a bearing on situational awareness.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed denial of exemption;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed exemption also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby deny the petition of Flight Training International, Inc., for an exemption from §§ 142.53(b)(1), 142.53(b)(2)(i), and 142.53(b)(3)(i).

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosure
99-1180.

#### State ex rel. Conley v. Ghee.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss of Margarette T. Ghee. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.