alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Allonge to Promissory Note-Joseph Hines



 Exhibit 10.7 
 ALLONGE TO 
 PROMISSORY NOTES 
 TO JOSEPH HINES 
 This Allonge (the “Allonge”), dated as of March 31,
2008, is attached to and forms a part of the following Promissory Notes (collectively, the “Notes”), made by SPHERIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), payable to the order of JOSEPH HINES, an
individual residing in the state of Arizona (the “Holder”): 
  

	 	1.	Promissory Note dated December 31, 2006, in the original principal amount of $447,000. 

  

	 	2.	Promissory Note dated March 31, 2007, in the original principal amount of $63,600. 

  

	 	3.	Promissory Note dated December 31, 2007, in the original principal amount of $55,000. 

 The Notes are hereby amended to provide that they are due and payable in full on December 31, 2008. In all other respects, the Notes are confirmed,
ratified, and approved and, as amended by this Allonge, shall continue in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and
Holder have caused this Allonge to be executed and delivered by their respective duly authorized officers as of the date and year first above written. 
  

			
	SPHERIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/    Michael Kirksey

		 	Michael Kirksey
	Its:	 	Executive Vice President and COO
	
	Accepted and agreed to:
	
	JOSEPH HINES
	
	 /s/    Joseph Hines
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6272

SUPREME RAHEEM ACKBAR, a/k/a Ronald Gary,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM R. BYERS, JR., Commissioner of the South Carolina Department of 

Corrections; WARDEN JOSEPH MCFADDEN; LIEUTENANT EUGENE 

SKIPPER; LIEUTENANT COOPER; SERGEANT WILSON,

 Defendants - Appellees,

and

LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; SCDC; STATE OF SOUTH 

CAROLINA,

 Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Florence. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (4:17-cv-01019-RMG)

Submitted: June 20, 2018 Decided: June 27, 2018

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Supreme Raheem Ackbar, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael DeAntonio, Christopher 

Thomas Dorsel, SENN LEGAL, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Supreme Raheem Ackbar appeals the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting defendants’ motion to dismiss his 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ackbar v. 

Byers, No. 4:17-cv-01019-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 6, 2018). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32






CERTIFICATION




By signing below, each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge, (i) this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of River Valley Bancorp.






Signed this 16th day of March, 2010.




/s/ Matthew P. Forrester

/s/ Vickie L. GrimesMatthew P. Forrester

Vickie L. GrimesPresident and Chief Executive Officer

Vice President of Finance











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to River Valley Bancorp and will be retained by River Valley
Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Maxcy, Respondent, vs. Swanby, Appellant.

*January 30*—

February *19, 1907.*

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Bayfield county: John K. Rakish, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed.*

*John Walsh,*for the appellant.

A. *W. McLeod,*for the respondent.

Cassoday, C. J.

The facts in this case are substantially the same as in *Washburn Land Co. v. Swanby, ante,*p. 1, 110 N. W. 806. In pursuance of the stipulation of the parties in this case and the decision in that case, the judgment of the circuit court in this case is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings according to law.

*By the Court.*— Ordered accordingly.
Order entered August 11, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00673
- CV
HUNTER - KELSEY OF TEXAS, LLC AND STRONGHILL TEXAS, LLC, Appellant s V. BAPA BROOKLYN 2004, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 20
- 03081
- E

ORDER Before the Court is appellants’ August 7, 2020 agreed motion to extend time to file their opening brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellants’ opening brief be filed no later than August 24, 2020.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
Compensation
      for Dr. Russell Richerson, COO

    Budget
      for Benefits Package to Employees

    


    July
      30, 2008

    


    At
      the
      meeting of GenSpera’s Board of Directors on July 30, 2008, the Board approved an
      annual salary to Dr. Russell Richerson the sum of $200,000 per annum effective
      July 1, 2008.

    


    The
      Board
      also approved a budget of $1,500 per month for expenses related to medical,
      dental and disability insurance benefits for each employee of the
      Company.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Richard K. Crump, as President and Chief Executive Officer of Sterling
Chemicals, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant ------- to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

     (1) the accompanying Form 10-K report of the Company for the period ending
December 31, 2003, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  March 19, 2004

                                    /s/ RICHARD K. CRUMP
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Richard K. Crump,
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer



                                       78
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1440 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1440

 To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to exclude a loan secured by a 
  non-owner occupied 1- to 4-family dwelling from the definition of a 
             member business loan, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2015

   Mr. Wyden introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to exclude a loan secured by a 
  non-owner occupied 1- to 4-family dwelling from the definition of a 
             member business loan, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Credit Union Residential Loan Parity 
Act''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF A NON-OWNER OCCUPIED 1- TO 4-FAMILY DWELLING.

    (a) Removal From Member Business Loan Limitation.--Section 
107A(c)(1)(B)(i) of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 
1757a(c)(1)(B)(i)) is amended by striking ``that is the primary 
residence of a member''.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act or the amendment 
made by this Act shall preclude the National Credit Union 
Administration from treating an extension of credit that is fully 
secured by a lien on a 1- to 4-family dwelling that is not the primary 
residence of a member as a member business loan for purposes other than 
the member business loan limitation requirements under section 107A of 
the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1757a).
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 20, 2021

No. 04-20-00439-CV

IN RE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

On September 9, 2020, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for 

temporary relief, which this court granted on September 16, 2020. The real party in interest filed 

a response to which relator replied. We conditionally grant the petition for writ of mandamus and 

order the Honorable Rosie Alvarado to, within fifteen days of this order, vacate the portion of her 

August 27, 2020 order granting in part the real party in interest’s motion to compel relator to 

disclose Jimenez’s medical records. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(c). The writ will issue only in the 

event we are informed Judge Alvarado has failed to comply with this order.

The stay issued on September 16, 2020 is LIFTED. 

It is so ORDERED on January 20, 2021.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of January, 2021.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019CI10989, styled Jake R. Trevino v. University of Texas at San Antonio, 

pending in the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas. The Honorable Rosie Alvarado, sitting by 

assignment, signed the order at issue in this proceeding.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          58,980
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  416,208
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               512,408
<PP&E>                                       6,591,013
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,344,350)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,959,681
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,683,795
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,466
<OTHER-SE>                                     998,343
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,959,681
<SALES>                                        737,688
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               757,738
<CGS>                                          726,349
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,604,316
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,075
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,671
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (879,324)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (879,324)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (879,324)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.56)
        

</TABLE>
FILED

April 29, 1998

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

STATE OF TENNESSEE, )

)

Appellee, ) C. C. A. NO. 02C01-9710-CR-00385

)

 vs. ) SHELBY COUNTY

)

JAMES MCCLENTON, ) No. 95-06366

)

Appellant. )

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court upon the state's motion to dismiss. Based

upon our review of the entire record before the Court, including the appellant's

response to the state's motion, we affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule

20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

The appellant pled guilty to simple possession and received a sentence of

eleven months and twenty-nine days and a fine of $750.00. The appellant now

attempts to appeal a certified question of law that he raised in his motion to suppress

and motion to dismiss prosecution.

In State v. Preston, 759 S.W.2d 647 (Tenn. 1988), our Supreme Court

stated that when a defendant pleads guilty and wishes to reserve a certified question of

law pursuant to Tenn. R. Crim. P. 37(b)(2)(i) or (iv), "the final order or judgment from

which the time begins to run to pursue a T.R.A.P. 3 appeal must contain a statement of

the dispositive certified question of law reserved by defendant for appellate review and

the question of law must be stated so as to clearly identify the scope and the limits of

the legal issue reserved." Id. at 650. It is the defendant's responsibility to assure that

the final order complies with these requirements and that the record on appeal contains

the proceedings necessary to a complete determination. Id.

In this case, the appellant failed to explicitly reserve the right to appeal a
2

certified question of law that was dispositive of the case as mandated by Tenn. R. Crim.

P. 37(b)(2)(iv) and Preston. The judgment sheet makes no reference to the certified

question and the final order of the court merely states that the appellant "has

specifically reserved for appeal the certified questions of law contained in his Motion to

Suppress and Motion to Dismiss Prosecution in this cause." See State v. Pendergrass,

937 S.W.2d 834, 837-38 (Tenn. 1996) (the order "does not satisfy the unambiguous

mandatory prerequisites of Preston. The order contains no clear identification of the

scope and limits of the legal issue reserved.") We are, therefore, precluded from

considering whether the trial court properly denied the appellant's motion to suppress

and motion to dismiss prosecution.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the state's motion is granted and the

judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee Court of Criminal

Appeals Rules. Costs are taxed to the appellant. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appellant's bond is hereby revoked.

The appellant shall be taken into custody immediately by the proper authorities. Costs

associated with this appeal shall be taxed to the appellant.

Enter, this the ___ day of March, 1998.

_____________________________

JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE

_____________________________

JOE B. JONES, PRESIDING JUDGE

_____________________________

PAUL G. SUMMERS, JUDGE
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1


                  CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with amendment no. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-KSB
of netGuru, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002 (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: December 2, 2002                             By:  /s/ Amrit K. Das
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Amrit K. Das
                                                         Chief Executive Officer


         In connection with amendment no. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-KSB
of netGuru, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002 (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: December 2, 2002                              By: /s/ Bruce K. Nelson
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Bruce K. Nelson
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARIO BRANNON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 151 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of October, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-42710) pertaining to the AVAX
Technologies, Inc. Amended & Restated 1992 Stock Option Plan of our report
dated April 15, 2008, with respect to the 2007 consolidated financial
statements of AVAX Technologies, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2007.

|                            |                                      
|--------------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                            | /s/ Briggs, Bunting & Dougherty,
 LLP
|                            |                                      
|Philadelphia,
 Pennsylvania |                                      
|April 15,
 2008             |                                      

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1306

MARIE M. MCMAHON, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus JOHN P. ADAMS, Assistant Prosecutor, Morgan County; DAVID H. SAVASTEN, Prosecutor, Morgan County; DONALD C. HOTT, Honorable, retired Senior Circuit Judge; JOHN M. HAMILTON, retired Circuit Judge; GLEN STOTLER, County Commissioner, Morgan County; CHARLES S. TRUMP, IV, Attorney, State Delegate; MARGARET GORDON, Attorney; SUSAN WEBSTER-MOSS, Town of Bath,Mayor-defacto; DONALD SHARP, Senior Magistrate; MORGAN COUNTY FIRE BOARD, Sheriff's Office; HOWARD TRITTIPOE, Secretary/Treasurer;MARTIN & SEIBERT, L.C.; DANIEL T. BOOTH, Attorney; SUSAN SNOWDEN, Attorney; PAUL WEISS; RAYMOND SHAPIRO, Doctor, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge. (CA-97-143-3) Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 21, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.2 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marie M. McMahon, Appellant Pro Se. Lucien Garlow Lewin, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Martinsburg, West Virginia; Paul Benedict Weiss, MARTIN & SEIBERT, L.C., Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing er civil action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McMahon v. Adams , No. CA-97-143-3 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 8 & Feb. 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Certification Pursuant To
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Somerset International Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the six months ending June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John X. Adiletta,
President, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of
               the dates presented and the results of operations of the Company.


                                           /s/ John X. Adiletta
                                           ------------------------------
                                               John X. Adiletta
                                               Chief Executive Officer


Dated: August  13, 2004