alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than March 5, 2015.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Gerald C. Tsai, Director, Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105-1579:

                    1.                     *Bruce M. Williams and Joyce L. Williams, Anaheim, California; Brian  Edward Williams, Yorba Linda, California; Ashley Maureen Williams, Orange, California; Brooke Ann Williams, Anaheim, California; Michael Robert Williams, Las Vegas, Nevada; Rebecca Kristy Williams, Fullerton, California; the Gladys M. Bryant Living Trust, Anaheim, California; and Bruce M. Williams as Trustee of the Gladys M. Bryant Living Trust, Anaheim, California;*                     to acquire and retain 10 percent or more of the shares of CalWest Bancorp and thereby indirectly South County Bank National Association, both of Rancho Santa Margarita, California.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 13, 2015.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Assistant Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-03426 Filed 2-18-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
**Exhibit 15.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-7166, 333-107491, 333-12372 and 333-127393) pertaining to the QIAGEN N.V. 1996 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Option Plan and the QIAGEN N.V. Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Plan of our report dated March 27,2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of QIAGEN N.V. included in the Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

McLean, Virginia 

March 29, 2006
# NRO 2020 Year in Review

                CHANTILLY, Va.  –              
In 2020, the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) saw opportunity in the face of adversity. Despite the challenges of COVID-19, NRO’s systems maintained 100 percent of their capabilities throughout 2020, thanks to the incredible efforts of our people and partners. We launched six missions from two countries, enhanced our ground capabilities with Future Ground Architecture (FGA) 2.0, and welcomed a new Principal Deputy Director — read more here.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-0722

Directorate Identifier: 2010NM262AD

737-53-1088, R1 --- 5/25/06

737-53-1088 --- 12/14/89

737-53A1166 IN 02 --- 7/13/06

737-53A1166 IN 03 --- 10/12/06

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
FIRST M
& F CORPORATION
 
 EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATIONS
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report
of First M&F Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Hugh S. Potts, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 A.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 B.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 Date:      August
7, 2009
 
 /s/ Hugh S. Potts, Jr.Hugh
      S. Potts, Jr.Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**
**Certification Pursuant to**
**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**
**As Adopted Pursuant to**
**Section 906 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002**
In connection with the Annual Report of The Houston Exploration Company (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, John H. Karnes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:
 1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.            /s/    John H. Karnes   Name:  John H. Karnes   Title:  Senior Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1461 

To provide for the extension of the enforcement instruction on supervision 

requirements for outpatient therapeutic services in critical access and 

small rural hospitals through 2015. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2015 

Mr. THUNE (for himself, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. MORAN, and Mr. TESTER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide for the extension of the enforcement instruction 

on supervision requirements for outpatient therapeutic 

services in critical access and small rural hospitals 

through 2015. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ENFORCEMENT INSTRUCTION 

4 ON SUPERVISION REQUIREMENTS FOR OUT5 PATIENT THERAPEUTIC SERVICES IN CRIT6 ICAL ACCESS AND SMALL RURAL HOSPITALS 

7 THROUGH 2015. 

8 Section 1 of Public Law 113–198 is amended— 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1461 IS

1 (1) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘2014’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘2015’’; and 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘calendar year 2014’’ and in4 serting ‘‘calendar year 2015’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 28, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00654-CR

CHAD SMALL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 263rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1383973

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant was charged with four offenses in four separate causes: 

(1) aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon in cause 1383973, which is the cause 

underlying this attempted appeal; (2) burglary of a habitation in cause 1349797; 

(3) assault of a family member in cause 1349798; and (4) possession of a 

prohibited item in a correctional facility in cause 1427347. 

Pursuant to a charge bargain, which is a type of plea bargain, the state
2

dismissed the charges in the latter two causes (1349798 and 1427347) in exchange 

for appellant’s guilty plea in the underlying cause (1383793).1The state said 

punishment should be based on the recommendation in the forthcoming presentence investigation report.

The trial court sentenced appellant to 25 years in prison. The certification of 

the defendant’s right to appeal says this is a plea-bargain case and the defendant 

has no right to appeal. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal. 

On appellant’s motion, we abated the appeal for the trial court to review the 

record and, if necessary, correct the certification of the defendant’s right to appeal. 

The trial court held a hearing on April 8, 2015. The state submitted, and the trial 

court admitted, the motions to dismiss in causes 1349798 and 1427347 as evidence 

of the charge bargain. At the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court ruled this is

indeed a plea-bargain case and the defendant has no right to appeal.

We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 

25.2(a)(2). Because this is a plea-bargain case, appellant has the right to appeal 

only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before 

trial, or (B) after receiving the trial court’s permission to appeal. Kennedy v. State, 

297 S.W.3d 338, 340–41 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); Shankle v. State, 119 S.W.3d 

808, 812–13 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (holding that state’s agreeing not to prosecute 

defendant in a separate cause constituted a charge bargain). 

The record does not reflect the trial court’s permission to appeal or any 

pretrial motions that could be appealed. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

 

1 After the trial court dismissed cause 1349798 on the state’s motion, appellant attempted 

to appeal from that cause. We dismissed that appeal because an order granting the state’s motion 

to dismiss is not an appealable order. See No. 14–14–00653-CR, Small v. State (Tex. App.—

Houston [14th Dist.] Sept. 4, 2014) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication).
3

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison, and Donovan

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6402

MATTHEW EUGENE MCNEILL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JEROME MORTON, Detective,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 96-6403

MATTHEW EUGENE MCNEILL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICKEY BIGGS, Detective,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District

Judge. (CA-96-18-5-CT-BR, CA-96-19-5-CT-BR)

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 5, 1996
2

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew Eugene McNeill, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. McNeill v. Morton, No. CA-96-18-5-CT-BR; McNeill v. Biggs,

No. CA-96-19-5-CT-BR (E.D.N.C. Mar. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 10.30A


                                                                   BANK HAPOALIM
                                                               NEW YORK BRANCHES
                                                               -----------------

                                                                     May 8, 2001

Ms.  Renee  Fulk
Chief  Financial  Officer
Level  8  Systems,  Inc.
8000  Regency  Parkway
Cary,  North  Carolina  27511

RE:     $15,000,000  LINE  OF  CREDIT  FROM  BANK  HAPOALIM  B.M.  (THE  "BANK")
     TO  LEVEL  8  SYSTEMS,  INC.  (THE  "COMPANY").

Dear  Ms.  Fulk:

     This will confirm that an application for extension of he maturity date for
the  above  referenced  loan is being processed by the Bank.  We will extend the
loan  to  April  15,  2002  and  anticipated delivering amended documents to the
Company  for  execution  shortly.

                              Very  truly  yours,

                              Bank  Hapoalim  B.M.


                              By:
                              Title:
                              Name:


                              By:
                              Title:
                              Name:





              1177 Avenue of the Americas  New York, NY 10038-2790
    Tel: (212) 782-2000  Fax: (212) 782-2222  TELEX: 620158  SWIFT: POALUS33

   Bank Hapoalim B.M. 50 Rotthschild Blvd. P.O. Box 27, Tel-Aviv 61000, Israel
Tel: (972-3) 5673333  TELEX: 342342  33612  SWIFT: POALILIT Fax: (972-3) 5607028
                                CABLE: Bankpoalim
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is
being submitted in connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of E*TRADE Financial Corporation (the Annual Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Robert A. Druskin, the
Interim Chief Executive Officer and Bruce P. Nolop, the Chief Financial Officer of E*TRADE Financial Corporation, each certifies that, to the best of their knowledge:



| | 1. | the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of E*TRADE Financial
Corporation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 24, 2010



|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    ROBERT A.
DRUSKIN                                                                  
|Robert A. Druskin Chairman & Interim Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|                                                                                          
|/S/    BRUCE P.
NOLOP                                                                     
|Bruce P. Nolop Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### ROWLAND BROTHERS v. R. J. MITCHELL & SON.

*Appeal, cause remanded.*

Where a transcript on appeal contains only the judgment of the court below, and shows no process or pleading, the cause will be remanded.

*(Weil*v. *Everilt,*83 N. C., 685, cited and approved).

Appeal from a judgment rendered at Fall Term, 1883, of GraNVILLE Superior Court, by *MacRae, J.*

The plaintiff appealed.

*Messrs. J. B. Batchelor*and *L. C. Fdwards,*for plaintiff

No counsel for defendant.

*650Smith, C. J.

The transcript of the record before us certified to be “full and accurate,” contains only the judgment rendered in the superior court, reciting that the case comes up on appeal from a justice’s court, the case embodying the exceptions signed by the respective counsel, and the appeal undertaking.

There is no process, nor waiver, nor pleading by -which we can see that the cause was properly constituted in the superior court, nor, except from the case, what was the subject of contention.

We cannot assume jurisdiction upon such a record, and must,, according to the rules for such imperfections, remand the cause. *Weil*v. *Everitt,*83 N. C., 685.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                         102,813
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,369,824
<ALLOWANCES>                                   159,169
<INVENTORY>                                    996,686
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,372,095
<PP&E>                                       1,252,578
<DEPRECIATION>                                 848,505
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,803,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,331,067
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        144
<COMMON>                                         4,043
<OTHER-SE>                                     468,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,803,533
<SALES>                                      1,996,143
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,996,143
<CGS>                                        1,401,670
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,401,670
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,092,263
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,689
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (498,074)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (498,074)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (498,074)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32**




CERTIFICATIONS
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
      connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of netGuru, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”), the undersigned
      hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Chief
      Financial Officer, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
              April 17, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Patrick
              A. DolanPatrick
              A. DolanChief
              Executive Officer


Dated:
                April 17, 2007
              By:
              /s/ Donald
                W.
                RutherfordDonald
                W. RutherfordChief
                Financial Officer


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# DATES:

Nominations must be submitted (postmarked or electronically received) by March 31, 2015.

                        Submissions must be electronic or by mail. Submissions should reference docket 229-C. Electronic submissions: You may electronically submit nominations, including attachments, to                         *nioshdocket@cdc.gov.*                         Attachments in Microsoft Word are preferred. Regular, Express, or Overnight Mail: Written nominations may be submitted (one original and two copies) to the following address only: NIOSH Docket 229-C,c/o Mia Wallace, Committee Management Specialist, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd. NE., MS: E-20, Atlanta, Georgia 30333. Telephone and facsimile submissions cannot be accepted. For further information contact: Paul Middendorf, Senior Health Scientist, 1600 Clifton Rd. NE., MS: E-20, Atlanta, GA 30333; telephone (404) 498-2500 (this is not a toll-free number); email                         *pmiddendorf@cdc.gov.*

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

[FR Doc. 2015-03682 Filed 2-23-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P