alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)
(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Lattice Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief:



(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation
of the Company.

|Dated: May 20, 2015 |     |                                                  
|------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------
|                    | By: | /s/ Paul Burgess                                 
|                    |     | Paul Burgess                                     
|                    |     | Chief Executive Officer, Secretary  and President
|                    |     | (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1561 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1561

To clarify the definition of nonadmitted insurer under the Nonadmitted 
      and Reinsurance Reform Act of 2010, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 11, 2015

 Mr. Leahy (for himself and Mr. Graham) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To clarify the definition of nonadmitted insurer under the Nonadmitted 
      and Reinsurance Reform Act of 2010, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Captive Insurers Clarification 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CAPTIVE INSURERS.

    Section 527 of the Nonadmitted and Reinsurance Reform Act of 2010 
(15 U.S.C. 8206) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (4) through (16) as 
        paragraphs (5) through (17), respectively;
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
            ``(4) Captive insurance company.--The term `captive 
        insurance company' includes any insurance company--
                    ``(A) that is wholly owned, directly or indirectly, 
                by a single parent company, and whose primary purpose 
                is to provide insurance to cover the risks of such 
                single parent company or any affiliates of such single 
                parent company;
                    ``(B) that is wholly owned, directly or indirectly, 
                by a group of companies, and whose primary purpose is 
                to provide insurance to cover the risks of such group 
                of companies or any affiliates of such group of 
                companies; and
                    ``(C) that is wholly owned, directly or indirectly, 
                by an industry, trade, or service group or association, 
                and whose primary purpose is to provide insurance to 
                cover the risks to any member in such group or 
                association or any affiliate of such member.''; and
            (3) in paragraph (12)(B), as so redesignated--
                    (A) by striking ``(B) does not include a risk 
                retention group'' and inserting the following:
                    ``(B) does not include--
                            ``(i) a risk retention group'';
                    (B) by striking the period at the end and inserting 
                ``; or''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(ii) a captive insurance company.''.
                                 <all>
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

# Current Images

HomeHistoryNational Cryptologic MuseumExhibits & ArtifactsCryptologic MuseumCurrent Exhibits

Search

Search

                              - All Images 
                              - Design Elements 
                              - NSA Historical Photographs 
                              - Other 

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (1.11 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

# Cryptologic Machines Image Gallery

HomeHistoryNational Cryptologic MuseumExhibits & ArtifactsCryptologic MuseumMachines

Search

Search

                              - All Images 
                              - Design Elements 
                              - NSA Historical Photographs 
                              - Other 

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (1.45 MB)

Tags:machines

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
USCIB: 5.2/87 Ih\NBH!i YU OOMINq? 0HANNEiLS OPlL¥ 

• 4 April 1955 

'l'QP SiSREI' '1:1181 E¥E8 9N:E.¥ 

UNITED ST!TES COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE pOARD 

AGENDA FOR 

One Hundred Fourteenth Meeting at 1030 on Friday, 

8 April 1955, in the Projection Room, 

Administration Building, CIA, Washington, D.C. 

Mr. Allen W. Dulles, Chai:nnan 

PART I - Agenda Items 

Date of Initial Subject 

Consideration Number 

8 Apr 1955 · 5.2/ 

10 Dec 1954 9.3/ 

11 Sep 1953 29.14/ 

Subject 

1. Approval of Final Minutes 

of the 113th Meeting. 

2. USCIB Mast~r Requirements 

List. (USCIB 9.3/30, 32, 

33, .39) 

Submitted by 

Secretariat 

Exec. Secy. 

NSA Member 

24 

PL 86-36/50 USC S605 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

i} Report by Mr. W. F. Friedman (to be distributed) 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-28-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

USCIB: 5.2/87 

'fOP SECRE;T 
USCIB: 5.2/87 

I OP SEC:!t'!! - tJ. S. EP!Ee 9NI:X 

PART II - Ba.ckgrolll'ld Information on Agenda Items 

Item No. Subject and Summary 

1. Final Minutes of the 113th Meeting. Comments are being received 

and will be distributed in advance of the meeting. 

2. USCIB Master Requirements List. Time did not permit consideration of this problem at the 113th meeting; however, USCIBEC has 

continued its study in an effort to arrive at a solution acceptable to all members. The Executive Secretary is meeting with 

members of USCIBEC on 4 April 1955 and will circulate to all 

USCIB members a progress report indicating USCIBEC action in this 

connection. 

.3. 

' 

Recent papers of interest in this problem are USCIB 9.3/30, 

.32, .33, and 39 • 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

USCIB 

USCIB: 5.2/87 - 2 -

TOP SECREr·
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1109/2006

of 19 July 2006         

derogating for the 2005/06 marketing year from Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 as regards the final dates for delivering wine to distilleries and its distillation

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine (1), and in particular Article 33 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Notwithstanding the first subparagraph of Article 63a(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000, for the 2005/06 wine year the volumes of wine covered by contract may be delivered to distilleries up to 31 July of that wine year.

Notwithstanding the first subparagraph of Article 63a(10) of Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000, for the 2005/06 wine year the wine delivered to a distillery must be distilled no later than 15 October of the following wine year.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 July 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 179, 14.7.1999, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2165/2005 (OJ L 345, 28.12.2005, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 194, 31.7.2000, p. 45. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1820/2005 (OJ L 293, 9.11.2005, p. 8).

----
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 18, 2018 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00912-CV 

LISA BATIE, Appellant 

V. 

AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK, FSB, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-06495-D 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By postcard 

dated August 13, 2018, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due. We directed appellant 

to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would 

result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated August 13, 2018, we informed appellant 

the docketing statement in this case was due. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the 

docketing statement within ten days might result in the dismissal of this appeal without further 

notice. By letter dated October 10, 2018, we informed appellant the clerk’s record had not been 

filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide 

verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or to provide written 

documentation appellant had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs within ten 
 –2– 

days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal 

without further notice. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, provided the required 

documentation, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). 

180912F.P05 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

LISA BATIE, Appellant 

No. 05-18-00912-CV V. 

AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK, FSB, 

Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 4, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-06495-D. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Evans and Brown participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK, FSB recover its costs of 

this appeal from appellant LISA BATIE. 

Judgment entered December 18, 2018.
1

The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-3836

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Missouri.

Daniel Jordan De La Pena-Arcadia, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: November 23, 2007

Filed: November 28, 2007

___________

Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Jordan de la Pena-Arcadia challenges the 97-month prison sentence the

district court1

 imposed after he pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute in excess of

5 kilograms of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(ii), and 846.

De la Pena-Arcadia’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that de la Pena-Arcadia contends

he did not knowingly, intelligently, or voluntarily plead guilty because he was not

properly advised due to the ineffective assistance of counsel, and suggesting de la
-2-

Pena-Arcadia should be appointed alternative counsel to avoid the appearance of a

conflict of interest.

De la Pena-Arcadia’s involuntary-plea claim is not cognizable in this direct

criminal appeal because he did not move in the district court to withdraw his guilty

plea, see United States v. Murphy, 899 F.2d 714, 716 (8th Cir. 1990), and he must

pursue any ineffective-assistance claims in a proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, see

United States v. Cook, 356 F.3d 913, 919-20 (8th Cir. 2004). 

After reviewing the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,

80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. We conclude that de la Pena-Arcadia’s

sentence, which was at the bottom of the properly calculated advisory Guidelines

range, is reasonable. See Rita v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462 (2007); United

States v. Harris, 493 F.3d 928, 932 (8th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, we affirm, and we

grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. In light of our conclusion that there are no

meritorious issues for appeal, we decline to appoint new counsel.

______________________________
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-3192

___________________________

J.S. Haren Company

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Fairfield Service Company of Indiana, LLC

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas - Hot Springs

 ____________

 Submitted: September 21, 2020

Filed: September 24, 2020

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Fairfield Services Company of Indiana appeals the adverse judgment entered

by the district court1

 following a bench trial in a diversity action raising claims under

1The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Arkansas.
Arkansas state law. Upon careful review, we conclude the district court did not err

in determining that the equipment supplied by Fairfield was defective, that Fairfield

failed to timely cure the nonconformities, and that the buyer’s revocation of

acceptance was timely and appropriate. See United States v. Missouri, 535 F.3d 844,

848 (8th Cir. 2008) (in appeal from civil bench trial, findings of fact are reviewed for

clear error, conclusions of law and mixed questions of law and fact are reviewed de

novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
----

(2004/C 78 E/0664)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3691/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(9 December 2003)

Subject:   Update on use of funding from the Daphne programme by the municipality of Pesaro-Urbino

In its answer to question E-1011/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Pesaro-Urbino had submitted projects and secured funding under the Daphne programme, the Commission stated that a number of proposals had been submitted, but that the outcome of the assessment would be available in July 2003.

Can the Commission say whether the projects submitted actually received funding and, if not, why they were not considered suitable?

Have any other projects been submitted in the meantime?

----

(1)OJ C 51 E, 26.2.2004, p. 62.

----
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-0449 Directorate ID: 2010-SW-021-AD

Helicopter Model: Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Model 206A, 206B, and 206B3 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 1,463

Costs:

The cost to revise the operating limitations section of the Rotorcraft Flight Manual for each 

helicopter is negligible, and there are no required parts.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Mark Wiley
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-392]
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a) on or before April 20, 2015.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. Request for hearings should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: Hearing Clerk/LJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated to the Deputy Assistant Administrator of the DEA Office of Diversion Control (“Deputy Assistant Administrator”) pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, appendix to subpart R. In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on September 5, 2014, Navinta LLC, 1499 Lower Ferry Road, Ewing, New Jersey 08618-1414, applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Controlled substance
SchedulePentobarbital (2270)
IIRemifentanil (9739)
II
 The company plans to initially to manufacture API quantities of the listed controlled substances for validation purposes and FDA approval, then to produce commercial size batches for distribution to dosage form manufacturers upon FDA approval. Dated: February 11, 2015. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2015-03489 Filed 2-18-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P