alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CAIR Replacement Rule Consultation and Information Sharing Calls between Tribes and EPA

January 21, 2011 and February 4, 2011


### I. Introduction In December 2010, EPA sent letters to all federally

- recognized Tribes in the country offering consultation on the proposed CAIR replacement rule . In addition, the January 7 NODA on allowance allocation methodologies specifically requested comment on allocating allowances to new units in Indian Country. EPA held two consultation and information

- sharing calls with 1 6 interested Tribes on January 21, 2011 and February 4, 2011. Tribes participating on these consultation and information calls provided comments on the proposed rul e and the allowance allocation NODA. 

### II. Tribal Participation The following tribes participated in these two calls as either consultation or information sharing: 1. Eastern Band of Cherokee Nation 2. Fond du Lac Band 3. Forest County Potawatomi Community 4. Fort Belknap Indian Community 5. Grand Portage Band 6. Kootenai Tribe 7. Lac de Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa 8. Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe 9. Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe 10. Moapa Band of Paiutes 11. Penobscot Indian Nation 12. Red Lake Band of Chippewa 13. Sac and Fox Nation of Missouri in Kansas 14. St. Regis Mohawk Tribe 15. Southern Ute Indian Tribe 16. Ute Mountain Ute Tribe 

### III. Discussion Topics The following topics were discussed over the course of the two calls:1. Allowances a. Distribution and use of allowances for new units in Indian country b. Retirement of allowances c. Allocation methodologies d. Tribal set

-aside for new and existing units 2. Non
- compliance penalties 3. Potential impact of n ew ozone standard 4. Opt
- ins 5. Exemption of cogeneration units 6. Proposed rule’s impact on nonattainment 7. Contribution from state in which Indian country is located 8. Modeling impacts on Indian country 9. Low
- sulfur vs. high

- sulfur coal 10. Non
- EGU sources 11. Treatment
- as -State 12. Air quality issues in areas outside proposed rule region
#### Andersen, Respondent, vs. Beck, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Bundy, Beach & Holland*of Eau Claire.

For the respondent: *Varnum & Varnum*of Hudson and *Edwin C. Brown*of Minneapolis, Minnesota.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
2003 NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE 

PIONEER RECOGNITION PROGRAM

CALL FOR NOMINATIONS

The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), Center for the Study of National Reconnaissance, is 

soliciting nominations for the 2003 National Reconnaissance Pioneer Recognition Program. The 

Director, NRO, Mr. Peter B. Teets, plans to recognize and honor individuals who have made 

significant and lasting contributions to the discipline and practice of national reconnaissance. 

Those selected as pioneers will be publicly honored during the third annual Pioneer Recognition 

Ceremony in September 2003, and a medallion will be dedicated for each honoree in the NROs 

Pioneer Hall. 

All individuals regardless of organizational affiliation (e.g., government, industry, military, etc.) 

are eligible for consideration as National Reconnaissance Pioneers. An information sheet about 

the pioneer program and a nomination form are attached. Please feel free to distribute these 

materials to those you feel might be interested in offering a nomination. Nominations must be 

received no later than 28 February 2003. 

 If you have questions about the Pioneer Recognition Program please contact Ms. Sarah 

Kindig at 703-808-1269. 

Nominations are no longer being accepted.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2169

THOMAS MICHAELS,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

CONTINENTAL REALTY CORPORATION,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:10-cv-01998-RDB)

Submitted: March 15, 2012 Decided: March 19, 2012

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Michaels, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Mark Feldenzer, 

Neil Serotte, SEROTTE ROCKMAN AND WESTCOTT, PA, Baltimore, 

Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Michaels appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his claims brought pursuant to the Americans with 

Disabilities Act and Maryland law. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Michaels v. Continental 

Realty Corp., No. 1:10-cv-01998-RDB (D. Md. Sept. 26, 2011). We 

deny Appellee’s motion to reconsider and vacate the Clerk’s 

order granting Michaels an extension in which to file his 

informal opening brief, and to dismiss the appeal. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2005006EN.01003301.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/33

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 28 October 2004

in Case T-35/01: Shanghai Teraoka Electronic Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (1)

1

(Dumping - Imposition of definitive anti-dumping duties - Electronic weighing scales originating in China - Undertaking with market economy status - Determination of injury - Causal link - Rights of the defence)

(2005/C 6/64)

Language of the case: English

In Case T-35/01: Shanghai Teraoka Electronic Co. Ltd, established in Shanghai (China), represented by P. Waer, lawyer, against the Council of the European Union (Agent: S. Marquardt, assisted initially by G. Berrisch and P. Nehl and subsequently by G. Berrisch, lawyers) supported by the Commission of the European Communities, (Agents: V. Kreuschitz, S. Meany and T. Scharf, with an address for service in Luxembourg — action for annulment of Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2605/2000 of 27 November 2000 imposing definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of certain electronic weighing scales originating in China, South Korea and Taiwan (OJ 2000 L 301, p. 42) — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition), composed of: V. Tiili, President, J. Pirrung, P. Mengozzi, A.W.H. Meij and M. Vilaras, Judges; J. Plingers, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 28 October 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the defendant; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the defendant;

| 3. | Orders the intervener to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the intervener to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 118 of 21.4.2001.

1

---
Additional Early Photo Satellite Records 

Declassified

26 November 1997

The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) today released newly declassified records associated 

with early photo satellite programs. This collection includes about 38,000 pages of documents 

and programmatic related pictures, plus a historical video tape.

The records involve the development, construction, launch and operation of the CORONA, 

ARGON and LANYARD photo reconnaissance satellite systems. However, this release adds no 

satellite imagery to that already available.

Interested people may view the collection in the NRO Reading Room outside the headquarters 

building in Chantilly, VA. Appointments are necessary 24 hours in advance and can be made by 

calling the Information Access and Release Center, (703) 808-5576.

These three satellite programs operated from August 1960 through May 1972 producing more 

than 800,000 images. Using 145 successful launches, the photography allowed the United States 

and its allies to keep track of military targets and operations in denied areas and to understand 

Sino-Soviet strategic capabilities. Imagery from these satellites may be obtained through the 

National Archives and Records Administration, Bethesda, MD, or the U.S. Geological Survey's 

EROS Data Center Customer Service, Sioux Falls, SD.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1342 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1342

   To require the Secretary of Energy to conduct a study and issue a 
   report that quantifies the energy savings benefits of operational 
    efficiency programs and services for commercial, institutional, 
                 industrial, and governmental entities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 14, 2015

 Ms. Warren (for herself and Mr. Crapo) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of Energy to conduct a study and issue a 
   report that quantifies the energy savings benefits of operational 
    efficiency programs and services for commercial, institutional, 
                 industrial, and governmental entities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STUDY AND REPORT ON ENERGY SAVINGS BENEFITS OF OPERATIONAL 
              EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS AND SERVICES.

    (a) Definition of Operational Efficiency Programs and Services.--In 
this section, the term ``operational efficiency programs and services'' 
means programs and services that use information and communications 
technologies (including computer hardware, energy efficiency software, 
and power management tools) to operate buildings and equipment in the 
optimum manner at the optimum times.
    (b) Study and Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy shall conduct a study 
and issue a report that quantifies the energy savings benefits of 
operational efficiency programs and services for commercial, 
institutional, industrial, and governmental entities, including Federal 
agencies.
    (c) Measurement and Verification of Energy Savings.--The report 
required under this section shall recommend methodologies or protocols 
for utilities, utility regulators, and Federal agencies to evaluate, 
measure, and verify energy savings from operational efficiency programs 
and services.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2005006EN.01002401.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/24

---

Action brought on 5 October 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Hellenic Republic

(Case C-427/04)

(2005/C 6/45)

Language of the case: Greek

An action against the Hellenic Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 5 October 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Wouter Wils and Georgios Zavvos, members of the Commission's Legal Service.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1) | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2001 on the interoperability of the trans-European conventional rail system (1), and in any event by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1)

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2001 on the interoperability of the trans-European conventional rail system (1), and in any event by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

1

| 2) | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing the directive into national law expired on 20 April 2003.

---

(1)  OJ L 110, 20.4.2001, p. 1.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



           CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE REGISTRANT,
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Dynamex Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "COMPANY"), on Form 10-K for the period ended July 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),
Richard E. McClelland, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,
that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ RICHARD K. McCLELLAND
-------------------------------------
Richard K. McClelland
President and Chief Executive Officer
October 20, 2003





This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1
                                                                    ------------

               Pegasus Satellite Communications, Inc. Subsidiaries

Subsidiary                                                    State of Formation
----------                                                    ------------------

Argos Support Services                                        Texas
B.T. Satellite, Inc.                                          Maine
Bride Communications, Inc.                                    Delaware
Carr Rural TV, Inc.                                           Michigan
DBS Tele-Venture, Inc.                                        Texas
Digital Television Services of Indiana, LLC                   Georgia
DTS Management, LLC                                           Georgia
Golden Sky DBS, Inc.                                          Delaware
Golden Sky Holdings, Inc.                                     Delaware
Golden Sky Systems, Inc.                                      Delaware
Henry County MRTV, Inc.                                       Ohio
HMW, Inc.                                                     Maine
Pegasus Broadcast Associates, L.P.                            Pennsylvania
Pegasus Broadcast Television, Inc.                            Pennsylvania
Pegasus Broadcast Towers, Inc.                                Delaware
Pegasus BTV Sub, LLC                                          Arkansas
Pegasus Communications Management Company                     Pennsylvania
Pegasus Media & Communications, Inc.                          Delaware
Pegasus Satellite Development Corporation                     Delaware
Pegasus Satellite Holdings, Inc.                              Delaware
Pegasus Satellite Television, Inc.                            Delaware
Pegasus Satellite Television of Illinois, Inc.                Illinois
Pegasus Travel, Inc.                                          Delaware
Portland Broadcasting, Inc.                                   Maine
Primewatch, Inc.                                              North Carolina
PST Holdings, Inc.                                            Delaware
South Plains DBS, L.P.                                        Texas
Telecast of Florida, Inc.                                     Florida
WBPG License Corp.                                            Delaware
WDBD License Corp.                                            Delaware
WDSI License Corp.                                            Delaware
WILF, Inc.                                                    Delaware
WOLF License Corp.                                            Delaware
WTLH License Corp.                                            Delaware
NO T F O R P U B LICATIO N IN W EST' S H AWAI # I REP O RTS AND P ACIF IC REP O RTER

NO. CAAP-20-0000572 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS O F THE STATE OF HAWAI # I CHRISTINE DEAN, Appellant-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES ADULT PROTECTION SERVICES, Appellee-Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 1CC191001357) ORDER OF CORRECTION (By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Summary Disposition Order of the court filed on June 25, 2024, is corrected by adding to the top of each page of the Summary Disposition Order the verbiage "NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI # I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER".

The Clerk of the Court is directed to incorporate the foregoing change in the original summary disposition order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, June 26, 2024. FOR THE COURT: /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Associate Judge

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-20-0000572 26-JUN-2024 08:05 AM Dkt. 61 OCOR
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       6,644,302
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,077,003
<ALLOWANCES>                                   391,000
<INVENTORY>                                    591,095
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,674,100
<PP&E>                                       5,121,431
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,437,631
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,800,484
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,773,579
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       137,187
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,800,484
<SALES>                                      4,067,919
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,067,919
<CGS>                                        1,009,976
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,009,976
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,795,758
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,737,815)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,737,815)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.97)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Telefónica del Perú, S.A.A. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Juan Revilla Vergara, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 27, 2005

| | /s/ Juan Revilla Vergara
| | ------------------------
| |                         
| | Name:                   
| | Title:                  



---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1



DYNAMEX INC.
CALCULATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
(in thousands except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       Years ending July 31,
                                                       ---------------------
                                                   2001        2000          1999
                                                 --------    --------      --------
<S>                                              <C>         <C>           <C>
Net Income (loss)                                $  2,025    $ (3,399)     $ (6,676)
                                                 ========    ========      ========

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding         10,207      10,207        10,099

Common Share Equivalents Related to Options
   and Warrants                                        30          --            --
                                                 --------    --------      --------

Common Shares and Common Share Equivalents         10,237      10,207        10,099
                                                 ========    ========      ========

Common Stock Price used under Treasury Stock
   Method                                        $   1.72    $     --      $     --
                                                 ========    ========      ========

Net Income per Common Share:
   Basic                                         $   0.20    $  (0.33)     $  (0.66)
                                                 ========    ========      ========
   Diluted                                       $   0.20    $  (0.33)     $  (0.66)
                                                 ========    ========      ========
</TABLE>