alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

RT DATA ENW. 

DATE ___Vs25.A7. 

MICROFICH 

DATE LP gl 

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. McLUCAS 

SUBJECT: NASA Proposals to Study MOL ATS and DORIAN 

Technology 

I have prepared a brief memorandum for your signature 

to Dr. Seamans summarizing the application of the MOL ATS, 

the GE Mission Simulator, and DORIAN Optical Technology to 

future NASA needs. This memorandum points out that the 

NASA study proposals are quite feasible. Further, the 

fact that they will be carried out under BYEMAN control 

defers the major policy issues until a later date. 

The memorandum also transmits a letter for Dr. Seamans' 

signature to Dr. Newell accepting the NASA proposals and 

identifying Colonel Lew Allen as the point of contact to 

work out the details of implementation. Although Colonel 

Allen is identified to NASA as the point of contact, I 

will actually undertake to work out the details of implementation with NASA as an extension of the NRO Staff for 

these matters. Should I be reassigned once I have completed my MOL close-out tasks, Colonel Allen would, of 

course, move these implementation responsibilities back 

into the NRO Staff proper. 

I propose that we set up a small task group immediately 

to meet with the appropriate NASA people and begin the 

preparation of work statements and plans. To do this, I 

recommend that we request the assistance of the MOL Office 

and two or three of the officers previously assigned to MOL 

now at AFSC; specifically Colonels White, Loret and Gandy. 

This can be done informally. 

woRKING PAPS! .9 

Page 2.., or _Sa—pagea 

Copy of copies 

L2,-F77-2 C,ovr 1. 

t541-6/ 

d l 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

As soon as we have progressed to the appropriate point 

I will, prepare guidance for you to send to General King. 

In the near future, I will provide him with copies of the 

correspondence and seek his advice and assistance as 

appropriate. 

RALPH J. FORD 

Colonel, USAF 

2 Atch 

1. Memo for Dr. Seamans 

2. Ltr for Dr. Newell 

V•701-1Kr:iG7 

Page of _pages, 

Copy copies DURIAN UL ek)atro1 e. 

-- • - ' e. 36 /241
#### Southerland *v.*Mallett.

A decree will be entered on an award, -at the term to which it is returned, if no exceptions to the award be made at that time.

This wás a suit in Equity, and all matters in dispute had been referred to arbitrators, who made an award in favor of Complainant — who now moved for a decree according-to the terms of the submission. *Williams, e contra*— A decree cannot now be entered on the award, fot? it was only returned to this term. The Defendant is absent, has not been served with the award, and has had no opportunity to except. *Davie*was stopped by the court.

*Per curiam*

The practice never has been *to*waif for exceptions against air award. The party is present at the examination by the arbitrators — be is notified (if the time — lie may apply at the ultimate time appointed for its delivery or publication, and know the contents — he is or ought to he in court attending on his suit, and may except to any thing improper, if *Mr. Williams*will now •make any exceptions, we will hear them, and if proper, give time to support them ; but we will not wait for the party to make exceptions. No exceptions being made, there was a decree according to the award.
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|               |  |                            
|-------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:          |  |                            
|March 10, 2005 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|               |  |                            
|               |  | John P. Manning            
|               |  | Principal Executive Officer
|               |  |                            
|               |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
LAW OFFICE OF JOHN MIETUS, LLC 

6701 DEMOCRACY BOULEVARD, SUITE 300 

BETHESDA, MD 20817-7500 

JOHN R. MIETUS, JR. 

(202) 747-5212 

(240) 396-5362 fax 

john@mietuslaw.com

October 28, 2011 

VIA REGULATIONS.GOV

Director, Flight Standards Service 

Federal Aviation Administration 

 c/o DOT Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

 Re: Petition of Colgan Air, Inc. for Extension of FAA Exemption No. 9959 

 Docket FAA-2007-29096 

 Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Colgan Air, Inc. d/b/a Continental Connection, United 

Express, and US Airways Express ("Colgan") respectfully requests that the Federal 

Aviation Administration ("FAA") extend the above-captioned exemption, issued November 

3, 2009 and set to expire November 30, 2011, for an additional period of two years (that is, 

through November 30, 2013). The current exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 121.434(c)(1)(ii) 

permits Colgan to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman or aircrew program 

designee for an FAA inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in command (PIC) who is 

completing initial or upgrade training specified in § 121.424 during at least one flight leg 

that includes a takeoff and a landing. 

 Extension of Colgan's exemption, as currently conditioned and limited, is in the 

public interest and will continue to provide a level of safety equivalent to that provided by 

the applicable regulation. Colgan employs check airmen and aircrew program designees 

who are highly qualified in its aircraft and who can observe qualifying PICs with the 

necessary level of scrutiny and objectivity. Continuing to permit these Colgan employees to 

conduct the required observations will allow the FAA (which retains the absolute right to 

observe qualifying PICs) greater flexibility in managing its inspection resources while 

allowing Colgan to ensure the timely qualification of PICs as needed. Thus, the relevant 

facts do not differ materially from those previously presented by Colgan and similarly 

situated petitioners. Further, the reasons cited by the FAA for granting the exemption to 

Colgan and to similarly situated petitioners also apply to Colgan's current situation. See, 

e.g., Exemptions 6473 (Federal Express, Docket FAA-2002-12343) and 10227 (Centurion 

Air Cargo, Docket FAA-2011-0120). 

 Good cause exists for the FAA to act on this non-controversial petition without 

delay and without publishing a summary in the Federal Register or awaiting comments 

as otherwise would be required under 14 C.F.R. § 11.87. No new precedent will be
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 18, 2022

No. 04-22-00030-CR

Jorge Rene VELASCO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CRN-000108-D4

Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was due on March 7, 2022. On January 27, 2022, court reporter 

Yvonne S. Nino filed twelve volumes of the record; however, the docketing statement filed in 

this appeal indicates David Laurel is the court reporter responsible for this case. Accordingly, it 

is unclear whether the reporter’s record is complete. We therefore order appellant to file a 

response by March 28, 2022 confirming whether the reporter’s record is complete. 

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of March, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

J. S.,

 Appellant,

v.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY 

AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-13-00354-CV

Appeal from the

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2012DCM03212) 

O R D E R

It has come to the Court’s attention that Volume I of the Clerk’s Record filed on 

November 27, 2013, contains confidential documents unrelated to the case and must be removed. 

Therefore, it is ordered that the El Paso County District Clerk prepare a corrected clerk’s record 

that does not include pages 205-429 of Volume I. The corrected clerk’s record must be filed on 

or before October 23, 2014. Upon receipt of the corrected clerk’s record the same will be 

considered filed as of the date that the original record was filed and will be substituted for the 

original record.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 2ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 2014.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, J., and Barajas, C.J. (Senior Judge)

Barajas, C.J. (Senior Judge)(Sitting by Assignment, Not Participating)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-41413 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAMES MICHAEL TAYLOR, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-03-CR-465-1

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent James Michael Taylor, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw from this direct appeal and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Taylor has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D June 23, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 4 August 2006         

amending Decision 92/452/EEC as regards certain embryo collection and production teams in the United States of America

(notified under document number C(2006) 3456)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/556/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 89/556/EEC of 25 September 1989 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in and importation from third countries of embryos of domestic animals of the bovine species (1), and in particular Article 8(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 92/452/EEC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision shall apply from the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 August 2006.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 302, 19.10.1989, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Commission Decision 2006/60/EC (OJ L 31, 3.2.2006, p. 24).

(2)OJ L 250, 29.8.1992, p. 40. Decision as last amended by Decision 2006/395/EC (OJ L 152, 7.6.2006, p. 34).

----

ANNEX

The Annex to Decision 92/452/EEC is amended as follows:

----
Fed
RY

PRE ET

ae oe:

wodssa

co

AVDAT/ia5 Maeva ve/T1791/ 15 Oct 59

itd

a

a

all

|



face

all pe 00 Chemater of vennEEE foegness Seigun te te

mses nes ot L acegened

pr eeininiendiahin

2.
vr 1s mes

hy

Lay
ae 2288S

8
a
2°

ea



yt

SS ac SAM 03
x uf

AYDAT/Maj Howerd/71792/'tw/15 Oct 59

=
ad

RI

ri

Bai

» tld. i
at
ie

: it ne
7 rth i

in

ott ott

what is



[i

el

i
a
pf


ie

Bay
it tie

VRS AA SAA
22rize2a2

Cree sS enone



2 mec Agee 2405 amas nm wens
2 wae Guesd Downatsy
PE Cans
. SenvTer
i= Ieregeen
aes AGENCE
iF Sigtan MOM Toomey

% oie |; JOHN LL Mam, m
Ragpuest ieee re _ Colonel, USAF a
bY . Dep



nd DOF wld be

Srosecaet

Jali

8 OE A NN

ugeuEaRS



26

oom

sean nm
Maj DB. Fhoye fies H.C. Howard san

x
iS

in|

108 et 1

/

() ee nem et
«
te
tn
ae

Chiets of Statz,
Fovee is
igen
peageen oni
Dee mth
yeogven teems-

- BXECNLIAE CLEICE

LICE

2) AY LEMIEr

paceliS by 222 _



2 onc Come ut « arms: a Le)
5 acm :

6 muc bl

l= .

= Siguew


Poa
t 7
7!
7

y I
me |
RNG

Admhs RO rho

/
*April 2, 1929.*

#### Necedah Manufacturing Company, Respondent, vs. Juneau County, Appellant.

For the- appellant: *Clinton G. Price*of Mauston, district attorney, and *J. T. Dithmar*of Elroy, special -counsel.

For the respondent: *Goggins, Braseau & Graves*of Wisconsin Rapids.

*By the Court.*

Order affirmed.
---

---

# Exhibit 10

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-114489, 333-9508, 333-6032,
333-7260, 333-9136, 333-132954) pertaining to the Israel Stock Option Plan and the United
States Stock Option Plan and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Check Point Software
Technologies Ltd. of our reports dated March 14, 2007, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. and subsidiaries, Check
Point Software Technologies Ltd. managements assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. and subsidiaries included in
theAnnual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2006.

|                 |                                   
|---------------- | ----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|Tel Aviv, Israel | /s/ KOST, FORER, GABBAY & KASIERER
|March 14, 2007   | A Member of Ernst & Young Global  



---

---
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM October 2017 

Structure for Water Control (587)

I.4 (+) Crop vigor and

production

1. Flume

with a culvert

D.3 (+) Impounded water; ability

to control release of water

D.4 (-) Fish

passage

I.13 (+/-)

Fisheries

C.1 (+/-) Income and

income stability

(individuals and

community)

C.2 (+/-) Quality

of receiving

waters

Irrigation Water Management (449)

Drainage W ater Management (554)

2. Flashboard

riser with cover

I.6 (-)

Sediments 

and 

contaminants 

to surface 

waters

D.1 (+) Cost of

installation, operation 

and maintenance

I.5 (+)

Potential 

income

I.2 (+) Water

conservation

I.12 (+/-)

Wildlife

habitat

(species

specific)

I.1 (+/-) Net

return

C.3 (+/-) Recreational

opportunities

I.3 (+) Water available for other uses

Dike (356)

Open Channel (582)

Shallow Water Development and 

Management (646)

Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management (644)

Wetland Enhancement (659)

Aquatic Organism Passage (396)

I.10 (+)

Hydroperiod

I.7 (+)

Infiltration

I.8 (+) Ground water

recharge

I.11 (+)

Wetland/

aquatic

Initial setting: (1) Irrigated/chemigated 

wetland/bog (cropland) where control of 

water levels is needed; (2) areas where it is 

desirable to provide shallow water areas to 

be managed for wildlife; (3) areas that need 

water control to decrease runoff and 

increase infiltration; or (4) other areas that 

need control of water discharge, distribution, 

delivery, or direction of flow

I.9 (+) Potential

for transport of

dissolved 

contaminants to 

ground water

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) (595)

Nutrient Management (590)

LEGEND

#. Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Mitigating practice

Associated practice

Start

Note: 

Effects are qualified with a 

plus (+) or minus (-). These 

symbols indicate only an 

increase (+) or a decrease (-) 

in the effect upon the 

resource, not whether the 

effect is beneficial or adverse.

D.2 (+) Water use

efficiency

Wetland Restoration (657)
#### Flood, Respondent, vs. Pabst Brewing Company, imp., Appellant.

*October 28*

November 17, *1914.*

*Flood v. Pabst B. Co., ante,*p. 626, followed.

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: Oscar M. Fritz, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Quarles, Spence & Quarles,*attorneys, and I. *A. Fish,*of counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Fish.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Hennessey & Hennessey,*attorneys, and *Yincent D. Hennessey,*of counsel, and oral argument by 7. *D. Hennessey.*

• Kbrwin, J.

This action was brought by the father of Annette Flood to recover his damages based upon the same state of facts set out in *Flood v. Pabst Brewing Co., ante,*p. 626, 149 N. W. 489, therefore is ruled by the decision in that case.

*By the Court.*— The order appealed from is affirmed.
NRO APPROVED FOR , 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2915 

RR RUXQBA 

DE RUXQAA 136 2681947 

ZNY XXXXX ‘10,1W 

R 2519467 

BT 

XXXXX 

348 

SECRET 251946Z SEP 69 CIT 

DORIAN SECUR. 

FOR GENERAL BLEYWtIER AND MR. COHEN COLONEL FORD. 

THIS MESSAGE IN SIX PARTS. 

PART I. 

SUPPLEMENTING TELECON MR. COEEN AND L/C KEMP THE FOLLOWING 

MESSAGE PREPARED BY L/C LAMBERSON, AFWL IS QUOTED FOR YOUR 

INFORMAT ION, 

QUOTE: REFERENCE RELATION OF MOL TO EIGHT CARD. MUCH OF THE TECHNOLKY 

ASSOCIATED WITH POINTING, TRACKING, COMMAND AND CONTROL, IMAGE 

VELOC I T Y SENS I NG, MA NUFA CT UR I NG AND TEST !NG OF BEAR I NGS, TORQUER S, 

ENCODERS, ETC., HAS A DIRECT APPLICATION TO EIGHT CARD. SOME 

OF THE INFORMATION IS PRESENTLY UNCLASSIFIED BACKGROUND 

INFORMATION FROM TO Ark. WE ARE FURTHER INTERESTED IN 

ANY MECHANISM WHICH CAN BE APPLIED TO MAKE CURRENT CLASSIFIED 

TECHNOLOGY AVAILABLE TO E IG HT CARD PROBLEMS. SPEC IF !CALL Y THE 

TECHNOLOGY PER TA IN I NG TO THE IVS SYSTEM: THE ACQUISITION 

AT TRACKING SYSTEM, THE GIMBALS, BEARINGS, AND ASSOCIATED 

TORQUERS AND GYROS ARE URGENTLY NEEDED FOR EIGHT CARD PROGRAMS. 

PAGE 2 

UNQUOTE. 

PART 11. 

FOR YOUR INFORMATION THE SUB CONTRACT EFFORT FOR THE 

SHAFT ENCODERS, TORQUERS AND BEARINGS AND GYROS WAS UNCLASSIFIED; 

TI-E EFFORT FOR THE ATS, IVS, BERRYLL !UM GIMBAL WERE CONTRACTED FOR 

IN THE BYEMAN SYSTEM. 
:4,14 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

PART III. 

REQUEST MR. COI-EN ACT AS THE POINT OF CONTACT DEALING DIRECTLY 

WITH L/C LAMBERSON AT AFL AND JIM DRYDEN AT TO (1) MANAGE 

THE RELEASE OF UNCLASSIFIED MOL TECHNOLOGY, HARDWARE AND REPORTS 

OF INTEREST TO THE AFSWC EIGHT CARD EFFORT AND (2) DETERMINE THE 

FEASIBILITY AND BEST METHODS FOR SURFACING THE MOL BYEMAN EFFORT 

OF INTEREST TO THE AFSWC EIGHT CARD EFFORT. 

PART IV. 

AND AFSWC HAVE BEEN ADVISED THAT MERE ARE NO ROL 

FUNDS AVA ILABLE TO SUPPORT THIS ACTIVITY. IT SHOULD BE CONF IRMED THAT 

ALL FINANCIAL, MATERIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES MUST BE PROVIDED BY 

THEM. 

PART V. 

REQUEST THE SO NOTIFY THE TCO OF THIS ACTION, SO THAT THE 

3 sy 

idrtirSi stes 

PAGE 3 1049 S E C ZL. T 

TRANSFER OR RELEASE OF DOCUNENTAT ION AND TECHNOLOGY CAN BE PROPERLY 

EFFECTED. 

PART V I. 

L/C KEMP WILL ADVISE GENERAL G IL BERT OF THIS PLAN, AND 

WILL FUNCT ION AS THE LOCAL ACT ION OFFICER. 

SECRET 

BT 

NN 

N 

tam System
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

MICROS SYSTEMS, INC.

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, A.L. Giannopoulos, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of MICROS Systems, Inc. (“Registrant”), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2006 of the Registrant (the “Report”):

          (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

| Date: February 8, 2007 | /s/ A.L. Giannopoulos |
|------------------------|-----------------------|
|                   |                       |
|                   | A.L. Giannopoulos     |
#### Lightner, by guardian *ad litem,*Appellant, vs. Jorstad, Respondent.

For the appellant: /. *W. Soderberg*of Barron.

For the respondent: *Willis Donley*of Menomonie.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.' Respondent to tax no costs for briefs because of failure to comply with the rule.