alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EMILIO DEJESUS-ZARRAGA, AKA 

Emilio DeJesus, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-73609 

Agency No. A206-406-559 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 15, 2018**

Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Emilio DeJesus-Zarraga, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review 

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). DeJesus-Zarraga’s request 

for oral argument, set forth in his opening brief, is denied. 

FILED

MAY 22 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-73609 

withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture 

(“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for 

substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 

1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for 

review.

In his opening brief, DeJesus-Zarraga fails to contest the BIA’s 

determination that he waived any challenge to the IJ’s dispositive finding that his 

asylum application was untimely. See Corro-Barragan v. Holder, 718 F.3d 1174, 

1177 n.5 (9th Cir. 2013) (failure to contest issue in opening brief resulted in 

waiver). Thus, we deny the petition as to DeJesus-Zarraga’s asylum claim.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that DeJesus-Zarraga 

failed to establish that he was or would be persecuted in Mexico on account of a 

protected ground. See Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (“An 

[applicant’s] desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or 

random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground.”). 

Further, we lack jurisdiction to consider the particular social groups DeJesusZarraga presents for the first time in his opening brief. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 

F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004) (petitioner must exhaust issues or claims in 
3 16-73609 

administrative proceedings below). Thus, DeJesus-Zarraga’s withholding of 

removal claim fails.

Finally, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief 

because DeJesus-Zarraga failed to establish it is more likely than not he will be 

tortured with the consent or acquiescence of the government of Mexico. See Aden 

v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part, DISMISSED in part.
#### *- v.*Deberry.

Case. For nuisance in erecting a.mill. *Per curiam,*Haywood only present — This action will be for every fresh continuance after a former action brought. It is not usual to give heavy damages in the first verdict, that is chiefly to ascertain the fact whether nuisance or riot. If the party afterwards remains obstinate and a second action becomes necessary, there the damages are usually high. There is some evidence of the assent of the Plaintiff’s father, that Defendant might build the mill; and of a subsequent agreement, that the Plaintiff’s father would rest satisfied if the Defendant would cut down the dam to seven and an half feet; but as no land can be conveyed without deed or other notorious acts, so a man’s lands cannot be charged by any matter of less solemnity. A licence to overflow a man’s land by a mill-ponds *286for this reason, is not good if only verbally given — and this to avoid the clanger* of charging or affecting a man’s real property by suborned oaths.

Note. — Upon the first point resolved in this case, sre to the same effect *Carruthers v. Tillman, post*501. The act of 1809, *Rev. c*773, points out anew mode of obtainingredress where lands .ire overflowed by a mill pond, which takes away the common law right of suing. unless in the case, specified by the act. *Mumford & others*v *Terry*2 *Car. Law. Rep.*425. In proceeding under the act of 1809. if' the Defendant dies, the lo irs cannot be made parties, and the suit must abate, *Fellow*v. *Fulgham,*3 *Murph.*254. With regard to the lies nse see *Cook*v. *Stearns,*11 *Mass. Rep.*533, cited in the 3d *Am. Ed. of Comyns on Cont.*80, where it is said that a verb -1 license, may esouse a trespass upon lands, though it cannot convey any permanent interest in them. The distinction seems to be foundedin justice and does not at all trench upon the rule of law which requires interests in land to be conveyed by deed. A license to overflow a man’s land by a mill,pond would create no permanent right or interest, if only verb-dly given ; but if the grantee of the license does the act, sur<-ly he may justify when attempted to be treated as a trespasser. It is true tile license may be countermanded, and then the grantee must forbear, or he will make himself from that time (what be would have been without a license) a trespasser.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

# NSA CLPT Director

HomeCultureCivil Liberties and PrivacyNSA CLPT Director

# Thomas D. "T.D." Stuck

## **Current Position**

Thomas D. "T.D." Stuck is the Director of the NSA office of Civil Liberties, Privacy, and Transparency. T.D. was previously with the Office of General Counsel (OGC), where he served most recently as the associate general counsel for Operational Authorities. T.D. has held various positions in OGC, including NSA's associate general counsel for Intelligence Law and special legal advisor to NSA's General Counsel. 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

civil libertiesprivacyCLPObioBiographyCivil Liberties and Privacy OfficeDirectorCLPO directorLeadership
# C_2004235EN.01000101.xml

| 22.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 September 2004

(2004/C 235/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2276 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,57 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4376 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68335 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0573 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5452 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,59 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,395 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5771 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,478 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,03 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6622 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4281 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3163 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 41 141 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,96 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,875 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 865 426 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7442 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5855 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5749 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8502 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0746 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 408,06 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9017 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2276

JPY

Japanese yen

134,57

DKK

Danish krone

7,4376

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68335

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0573

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5452

ISK

Iceland króna

87,59

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,395

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5771

CZK

Czech koruna

31,478

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,03

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6622

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4281

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3163

ROL

Romanian leu

41 141

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,96

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,875

TRL

Turkish lira

1 865 426

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7442

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5855

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5749

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8502

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0746

KRW

South Korean won

1 408,06

ZAR

South African rand

7,9017

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

# Cryptologic Machines Image Gallery

HomeHistoryNational Cryptologic MuseumExhibits & ArtifactsCryptologic MuseumMachines

Search

Search

                              - All Images 
                              - Design Elements 
                              - NSA Historical Photographs 
                              - Other 

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (1.86 MB)

Tags:machines

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
99-920.

#### Abbott v. Haight Properties, Inc.

Lucas App. No. L-98-1413. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists on the following question certified by the court of appeals in its Decision and Judgment Entry filed April 13,1999:

‘When, in a multi-defendant and/or multi-issue case, one defendant is granted summary judgment (or partial summary judgment on fewer than all the issues is granted) in a decision of the trial court which does not contain a Civ.R. 54(B) certification that there is no just reason for delay, and the remaining defendant(s) and/or issues are subsequently dismissed without prejudice, is the decision granting summary judgment dissolved or does it then become appealable?”

Resnick, J., not participating.

Saa *sponte,*cause held for the decision in 98-1935, *Denham v. New Carlisle,*Clark App. No. 98CA19; briefing schedule stayed.

Resnick, J., not participating.

The conflict case is *Eiland v. Coldwell Banker Hunter Realty*(1997), 122 Ohio App.3d 446, 702 N.E.2d 116.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 36 (Tuesday, February 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 9737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03637]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Tools for Assessment and 
Improvement of Neurologic Outcomes in Perinatal Medicine.
    Date: February 24, 2015.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute of Child 
Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5B01, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, (301) 435-6680, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bdced6dcd3d9dccedcfdd0dcd4d193d3d4d593dad2cb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="92e1f9f3fcf6f3e1f3d2fff3fbfebcfcfbfabcf5fde4">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 18, 2015.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-03637 Filed 2-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             943
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,525
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        612
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,700
<PP&E>                                             818
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,516
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,332
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,245
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,516
<SALES>                                          2,683
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                            1,386
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,581
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (38)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,096
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,094
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,094
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements pertaining to the ZOLL Medical Corporation 1992 Stock Option Plan(Form S-8 Nos. 333-68403, and 333-101839), the Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-101839 and 333-68401) the 401(k) Saving Plan (Form S-8 Nos. 333-38048 and 333-137245), the Amended and Restated 2001 StockIncentive Plan (Form S-8 Nos. 333-120310 and 333-132804), the 2006 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (No. 333-132804), and the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-120454) of our reports dated December 12, 2007, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements and schedule of ZOLL Medical Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of ZOLL Medical Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedSeptember 30, 2007.

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

 

December 12, 2007 

Boston, Massachusetts
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 SPEN HANDLING 

19 Aug 64 

MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD 

SUBJECT: Meeting 19 Aug 64 with Gen Greer 

1. Dr. Leonard and Col Brady set up a meeting with Gen Greer 

to discuss the interface problems posed by the present Image 

Velocity Sensor (IVS) development. 

2. Evaluation of the responses to the RFP for the Pre Phase I 

for the IVS has resulted in the selection of the IBM-ITEK team 

for this job. Dr. Leonard and Col Brady are concerned that 

this "white" development of the IVS may not result in a system 

that is compatible or consistent with the system being conceived 

in the "black" at EKC. Because of the desire to make use of the 

EKC effort Col Brady had initially considered a dual source for 

the IVS with LMSC in addition to IBM-ITEK. In such an approach 

it was assumed that the EK inputs would get into LMSC through 

the present "black" channels. Concern over the workability of 

this approach together with contractual problems with LMSC 

prompted Col Brady's desire for this meeting. 

3. The following courses of action were considered as means of 

providing EK inputs to the IVS effort. 

a. LMSC as a second source for IVS as originally considered 

by Col Brady with EK providing "black" inputs. 

b. LMSC as a second source but somhow directed to bring 

in EK as a "white" sub-contractor. Then the "black" inputs could 

be carried on at EK for the LMSC-EK developed IVS. 

c. Proceed with IBM-ITEK alone with an exchange of 

information between MOL (AF and A/S) and SP (AF and A/S). 

The outputs as available from IBM would be closely reviewed 

and evaluated by the SP Dorian team. In turn SP (AF and A/S) 

would provide recommendations through their MOL interface 

based on progress of work at EK. 

d. Proceed with IBM-ITEK alone and arrange for an IBM 

"black" interface into the Dorian effort at EK. 

SPrc,31 ilANDLING 
( 

YRON F. KNO 

Lt Colonel, USAF 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 SPF,11 11,1,111LING 

4. Of the above approaches, Gen Greer preferred 3c as a first 

choice with 3d as a second position. Dr. Leonard seemed to 

feel that 3c would be a very minimal arrangement and would require some Dorian clearances on the MOL-A/S side of the house 

and that 3d would be a preferred solution. He and Col Brady 

both felt that the 3b arrangement would be very acceptable but 

Gen Greer was not receptive to this approach. 

5. Gen Greer felt that to proceed with any approach other than 

3c, a briefing to Dr. McMillan would be in order to outline our 

position and recommended course of action. Stich a briefing 

could also include any proposed future work that could be 

considered on the LMSC simulator. 

SPECUNDLING
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 33 (Thursday, February 19, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8948]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03472]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 3, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Powers at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(954) 423-7977.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee will be held Tuesday, March 3, 2015 at 1 
p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to make 
oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to 
limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Donna Powers. For more information please contact: Donna 
Powers at 1-888-912-1227 or (954) 423-7977 or write: TAP Office, 1000 
S. Pine Island Road, Plantation, FL 33324 or contact us at the Web 
site: http://www.improveirs.org. The committee will be discussing 
various issues related to Tax Forms and Publications and public input 
is welcomed.

    Dated: February 12, 2015.
Otis Simpson,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2015-03472 Filed 2-17-15; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P