alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
• •

ASNATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON, MC

--10P-SECRET- ..

11111111Mplill

Copy To:

11

THE NRO STAFF 2 September 1976

111111111111 MEMORANDUM FOSUBJECT: Civil Applications ommittee M eeting, 30 August 1976

The Chairman announced that a planned information briefing

to potential civilian users has been firmly scheduled for 1300

hours, 15 October 1976, at CIA's "Beehive Auditorium". A dry run

is to be held between 5-7 October in connection with the next

Civil Applications Committee regular meeting. The briefing will

be at the SECRET non-codeword level. Questions from the floor

will be entertained. The objective of the briefing is to inform

potential users of the capabilities that exist and educate them

on potential uses of these capabilities. Invitational letters

(SECRET level) will be dispatched "advertising" the briefing. For

the briefing to be considered a success it will be necessary to

have in attendance a good representation from all potential

civilian agencies authorized to use the classified product.

The CIA ex-cfficio member has been requested to furnish the

CIA General unsel opinion on the "proper use" in question.

CIA, stated that this is a difficult subject and

one in w s are having much trouble. During the

discussion entioned that it miiht be possible to

use the product (at t e CRET level)

The Chairman stated that he had requested membership on the

Space Policy Committee but had been nicely turned down; however,

was told that he would be invited to attend as an observer when

matters directly concerning the CAC were discussed.

Committee members felt that their use the product should

be considered in connection with the OC evaluations

that will be conducted over the next ear. s decided that

the proper form for those inputs would be through the Mapping,

Charting and Geodesy Working Group of COMIREX.

'orations

wan mom

OENINIAL scosocut es _Top_sEcia_

IUMBOONVO MOON INNS ONONIPTION &MOONY NW 0OCLASINPY ON WO Olt

CONTROL NO I AVERXA 

COPY s

SAGE 1 of 1 amles
I 

['CIRO APPROVED FOR 

T

EASE 1 JULY 2015 

Originator: 

SAFSL 

ByEmANCON..•::o NELSONiq ?AP 

t I tum 

Distribution (Outside SAFS1.):' 

Pentagon Only . 

;w.%r 

Due, MAY 24, 1968 

Addressee(s) 

PRIORITY Action: 

Information: 

Precedence 

DORIAN SECUR: 

EYES ONLY TO GENERAL BLEYMAIER FROM GENERAL STEWART. I HAVE 

RECEIVED INSTRUCTIONS FROM DR. BROWN AND DR. FLAX THAT WE MUST 

TAKE IMMEDIATE AND POSITIVE ACTION TO REDUCE THE MOL PROGRAM TO 

A SPENDING LEVEL WHICH WILL NOT EXCEED A $500 MILLION NOA IN FY 69 

WITH AN "EXPOSURE" POSITION NOT TO EXCEED A TOTAL 'OF $35 MILLION AT 

THE END OF FY 69. AT THE LAST PRC, I RECALL THAT YOU ESTIMATED A 

5 TO 6 MONTH SLIP IN THE PROGRAM SCHEDULE AT AN FY 69 LEVEL OF 

$520 'MILLION WITH NO EXPOSURE. THEREFORE, I ASSUME THAT ON THE. 

•BASIS:OF AN FY 69 NOA OF. $500 MILLION WITH A $35 MILLION EXPOSURE. . 

AT THE END OF THE FISCAL YEAR,.THE SCHEDULE IMPACT SHOULD BE. 

ESSENTIALLY THE SAME.. REQUEST YOU NOT NOTIFY THE CONTRACTOR 

OF THIS SITUATION OR go A YEkl. COUFBRENCE PRIOR 

BYEMAN CONY i-Z01, Cil OINELS ONLY Releasing Officer 

CI:aisit■ catioil . 

Originatit.i Officer 

,;OL RALPH FORD MAJ GEN JAMES T. STK 
OR() Apv.i_oyED..wcal Sheet 

Ra-EAssE 1 JULY 2015 8 BYEMAN CON .:10L C:-IANNELS 0 LY 

C::lssific.: :ion 

Page y 2 _of 2 

TO MY VISIT WITH YOU ON 3-4 JUNE DURING WHICH WE CAN MAP OUT A 

COURSE OF ACTION ON HOW TO PROCEED FROM THIS POINT FORWARD. 

)riginating Officer: 

COL RALPH FORD 

BYEMAN CONTROL CHANNELS ONLY i Releaing Officer: 

GEN JAMES STEWARI 

Classification
# C_2005025DE.01000401.xml

| 1.2.2005 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 25/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2005

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 25/4

---

Berichtigung der Aufforderung(en) zur Einreichung von Vorschlägen für indirekte FTE-Maßnahmen im Rahmen des spezifischen Programms für Forschung, technologische Entwicklung und Demonstration „Ausgestaltung des Europäischen Forschungsraums“

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 309 vom 15. Dezember 2004
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 309 vom 15. Dezember 2004

(2005/C 25/04)

Seite 11, Anhang, Punkt 10 erster Gedankenstrich:

anstatt:

| „— | Forschungsteams oder Stellen, die Auszeichnungen verleihen, können nur ein Projekt pro Vorschlag und höchstens fünf Vorschläge unterbreiten.“ |
| --- | --- |

„—

Forschungsteams oder Stellen, die Auszeichnungen verleihen, können nur ein Projekt pro Vorschlag und höchstens fünf Vorschläge unterbreiten.“

muss es heißen:

| „— | Forschungsteams oder Stellen, die Forschungsteams vorschlagen, können nur ein Projekt pro Vorschlag und höchstens fünf Vorschläge unterbreiten.“ |
| --- | --- |

„—

Forschungsteams oder Stellen, die Forschungsteams vorschlagen, können nur ein Projekt pro Vorschlag und höchstens fünf Vorschläge unterbreiten.“

---
Exhibit 32A

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AutoInfo, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harry
Wachtel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company. A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.


/s/ Harry Wachtel
-----------------
Harry Wachtel
Chief Executive Officer
May 12, 2004


                                       20
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of SK Telecom Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: April 30, 2013 |  | /s/ Sung Min Ha                      
|                      |  | Sung Min Ha                          
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
eat Mr. W. De Orr ye ms
Van nied California --. . so co

le 74 40 xecpcebed, teak Lockheed Alzocest Gtdgaretion aske

Sarit pertaine to the suiliscy powr waite to the Meckie mere”
as rey

. Comiseien and Air Foros contractors eveiving the masiese tne

auxiliary power unit for, the satellite. :

“Be The briefing will be given at Westera Development Division
“on 22 July 1956 to Atasics International, Air Research, Lockheed
Hehe Rete Mision Cempec Pratt so he Gite 2, rten
CRRDANY’o

A Be Particular attention should be given to time-phasing and
anit an the 46 LITE developenate ee Se of



- .

1 ES) pean Lol G07 : , 117L 1956 Folder No. 2A
## SERVE D JANUAR Y 11,201 0
U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C
INTH EMATTE RO F 

### LAK ECHELA N AI RSERVICE , INC
. FA A DOCKE T NO
. CPCP09NM000 7 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S No
. FAA-2009-009 6 

### AMENDE D PROCEDURA L ORDE R Paragrap h# 2 o f

th e Procedura l Orde r

i s amende da s follows : WHEREFORE , th e partie s b e an dar e hereb y ORDERE D t o adher e t o th e followin g procedura l schedule :

.. . O n o r before Jun e 1 , 2010 , th e partie s shal l conclud e al l discovery including , but no t limite dto , depositions , documen t production , response s t o productio n request s and/o r

interrogatories
. I f

th e partie s canno t

resolv e adiscovery disput e the y shal l submi t

th e disput e t o th e undersigne dfo r resolutio ninatimel y manner.. .

iwi n U.S
. Administrativ e La w Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No
. CP09NM000 7 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washuigton , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Frankli n L
. Smith , Attorne y Hedric k Smith , PLL C 80 0 Fift hAvenue , Suit e 400 0 Seattle , WA 9810 4 TEL : 206-464-116 6 FAX : 206-464-181 1 Davi dF
. Shayne , Attorne y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Northwes t

Mountai n Region , ANM- 7 160 1 Lin dAvenue , S.W
. Renton , W A 98057-335 6 TEL : 425-227-216 5 FAX : 425-227-100 7 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwi n Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 40 0 SeventhStreet , S.W. , Roo m541 1 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-213 9 Legal Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n perso no r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue, S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000, Washingt(|n

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
.
#### Duval and others, Respondents, vs. Welch, Appellant.

*January 12*

January *30, 1912.*

*Mines and mining: Parol license, when revocable: Valuable discovery or prospect.*

The question being whether defendant, who had been mining on plaintiffs’ land under a parol license, had struct a valuable discovery or prospect so that, under sec. 1647, Stats. (1898), his license could not be revoked, findings by the trial court to the effect that the ore found by the defendant was not a new or valuable discovery nor a valuable prospect are *held*to be sustained by the evidence.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Lafayette county: Geoe&e ClemeNtsoN, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Eor tbe appellant there was a brief by *Orton & Osborn,*and oral argument by P. *A. Orton.*

Eor the respondents there was a brief by *Simpson & O'Brien*and *Ernest G,*Fiedler, and oral argument by *Mr. Fiedler.*

Winslow, C. J.

This is an action in equity by the owners of mineral lands to enjoin the defendant'from mining upon such lands. The defendant claimed the right to mine thereon under a parol license given by the plaintiffs’ ancestor in title. It is admitted that the license had been revoked if it was capable of revocation, but defendant claims that it was not capable of revocation, because he had struck a valuable discovery or prospect upon the land, and hence was protected from such revocation by the terms of sec. 164Y, Stats. (1898). The action was tried by the court, which found, among other things, that the land in question had been- mined for fifty years; that a range of ore existed thereon which was discovered many years prior to the time when the defendant commenced mining on the land; that the work done by the de*245fendant was work upon that range; that the defendant found ore in a disseminated form through the rock and also came upon a pocket containing some cog lead and zinc ore, but that the ore so found was merely a pocket, and was neither a new nor valuable discovery nor a valuable prospect. Judgment was therefore entered for the plaintiffs.

Examination of the evidence shows that the findings above set forth are amply sustained by the evidence, hence the judgment must be affirmed.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed;
**Exhibit 12.1****Ratio of Earnings (Losses) to Fixed Charges(000’s)**                       **2007**  **2006(1)**  **2005(1)**  **2004(1)**  **2003(1)**    Earnings (Losses):                    Income (loss) fromcontinuing operations, pre-tax  (22,038)  (119,150)  (29,149)  (32,619)  2,028 excluding Energy, pre-tax  367   962   1,063   1,018   532    **Total**  **(22,405****)**  **(120,112****)**  **(30,212****)**  **(33,637****)**  **1,496** Fixed charges  18,344   11,510   11,790   11,422   12,019    Total  (4,061)  (108,602)  (18,422)  (22,215)  13,515                      Fixed Charges:                    Interest expense, excluding interestincome & capitalized interest  17,411   11,110   11,390   11,024   11,636 Amortized expenses related toindebtedness  933   400   400   398   383    Total  18,344   11,510   11,790   11,422   12,019                      Ratio of earnings (losses) tofixed charges  (0.2)  (9.4)  (1.6)  (1.9)  1.1 Additional pre-tax earnings neededto achieve a 1:1 ratio  22,405   120,112   30,212   33,637   —  (1) See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this document regarding the restatement of previously issued financial statements.
Exhibit 32A

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of AutoInfo,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission (SEC) on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Harry Wachtel,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be  retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its staff upon
request.


/s/ Harry Wachtel
-----------------
Harry Wachtel
Chief Executive Officer
May 2, 2006


                                       18
<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                  
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,029
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,465
<ALLOWANCES>                                       406
<INVENTORY>                                     37,254
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,245
<PP&E>                                          22,422
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,464
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 171,324
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,735
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,320
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,024
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   171,324
<SALES>                                        213,229
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               213,229
<CGS>                                          120,947
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  120,947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,433
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,315
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,765
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,094
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,671
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,671
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.84
        

</TABLE>
#### JOHN S. REESE & CO. v. JAMES F. JONES.

*Filing Answer*— Discretion *of Judge.*

The refusal of a judge to allow an answer to be filed at the trial term is not reviewable; it is a matter addressed to his discretion.

*{Bodclie*v. *Woodard,*S3 N. C., 2, eited -and approved.)

Civil ActioN tried at Fall Term, 1880, of Greene Superior Court, before *Gudger, J.*

The summons was issued on the 27th of January, 1880, returnable to spring term, 1880, at which term an entry was made on th.e docket as follows: “ Time to file pleadings as <of spring term, 1880.” About three months prior to fall *598term of same year, the trial term-., the plaintiffs filed' their-complaint duly verified, in which they declared upon two-writings obligatory under seal for the payment' of money— one dated April 1st, 18-79, for three hundred and fifty dollars, and the other dated May 1st, 18-79, for four hundred and fifty dollars, both- due on the first day of November following.-

At th-e time-of filing the complaint, the plaintiffs’’ counsel notified the defendant’s counsel of the fact, and called! - his attention to the fact that his client, the defendant,, was in Snow Hill, the county town of Greene- county. On the fourth day of fall term, 1880, th-e case being called in regular order on the docket, the defendant offered bis answer and ashed leave to file the same, when on motion of plaintiffs’ counsel, the court *in*the exercise of its discretion refused to allow the defendant to file it, and rendered judgment against him for the amount claimed by the plaintiffs, from which judgment the defendant appealed.

*Messrs. Strong, Monroe*and *Dortch,*for plaintiffs.

*Messrs. Galloway & Albritton,*for defendant.

Ashe, J.

The case of *Boddie*v. *Woodard,*83 N. C., 2, was very much like this. There, the entry was “ complaint filed, time to demur or answer.” At the ensuing term the defendant’s counsel moved to file an answer, which the court refused and gave judgment for the plaintiff. This court on the appeal of defendant held that while it would not undertake definitely to fix the limits of the extension in such cases, they cannot he allowed to reach the trial term, and as the motion to put in the answer at that term was addressed to the discretion of His Honor, its exercise could not be reviewed and controlled in this court.

Ours is a somewhat stronger case than -that, for here, *the*complaint was filed three months before the trial term, and-*599the defendant’s counsel was notified, at the time, of the' fact of the complaint being filed, and. was also informed-¡that his client -was then in town. The defendant was guilty •of laehes. There is no excuse for the delay. The allowing the answer, to be filed at the trial term was a pure matter of discretion, and is not reviewable in this court. .

No error. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM QUARTERS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         859,710               2,342,849
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  753,807                   5,380
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,189,986               2,828,950
<PP&E>                                         114,045                  69,555
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,840                  16,786
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,340,838               2,913,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,369,502                 605,401
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                    11,059,293              10,484,681
<OTHER-SE>                                    (89,725)                (96,952)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   971,336               2,913,074
<SALES>                                        128,232                  38,166
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               128,232                  38,166
<CGS>                                          207,662                 782,937
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  207,662                 782,937
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,852,608               2,106,198
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,082                 103,910
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,917,376)             (2,954,879)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800                     800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,918,176)             (2,955,679)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,910,176)             (2,955,679)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.69)                  (1.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.69)                  (1.84)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0511 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BRADLEY ALAN STOKES ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 8, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 28 2022

02/28/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0511