alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.2





Exhibit 10.2


Fiscal Year 2009 BioMeasurement Division Management Bonus Plan

of Hutchinson Technology Incorporated


     We
have a fiscal year 2009 management bonus plan that covers executive officers and certain
other management-level employees of our BioMeasurement Division. The plan is designed to create an
incentive for management of our BioMeasurement Division to achieve goals that our board of
directors believes align with the interests of our long-term shareholders. The plan design
includes an annual corporate financial goal as well as additional
division strategic goals. Individual bonus targets, expressed as a percentage of base salary, are
approved for all executive officers by our board of directors upon the recommendation of the
board’s compensation committee.


     Fifty percent of the bonus target is dependent on our achievement of an annual corporate
financial goal, which is set giving consideration to both near-
and long-term financial performance. For fiscal year 2009, earnings before taxes (EBT)
will be the corporate financial goal. The award amount to be paid based on EBT is determined
based on whether actual EBT for the fiscal year is above (subject to a ceiling, above which no
further amounts are awarded) or below (subject to a floor, below which no amounts are awarded) the
pre-established goal for EBT. In addition, a pre-established minimum threshold EBT must be
achieved in order for our chief executive officer and chief financial officer (both of
whom participate in this plan) to receive any bonus amount for fiscal year 2009.


     The
remainder of the bonus target is dependent on achievement of certain
division strategic goals in the areas of market penetration and
revenue. As with the corporate financial goal, the award amount to be paid based
on these strategic goals is subject to a ceiling (above which no further
amounts are awarded) and a floor (below which no amounts are awarded) in relation to achievement of
pre-established thresholds. Fifty percent of the annual cash incentive opportunity for executive officers who provide
corporate support to both of our business divisions is based on the achievement of division strategic
goals, divided equally between the strategic goals established by this plan and by our Fiscal Year 2009 Disk Drive
Components Division Management Bonus Plan.


     The decision to pay bonuses is made annually by our board of directors upon the recommendation
of the compensation committee of our board. Bonuses are paid in cash in the first quarter of the
following fiscal year. The actual total bonus amount paid to any participant may not exceed 200%
of the participant’s bonus target, and the actual total bonus amounts paid to all participants
under this plan and under our Fiscal Year 2009 Disk Drive Components Division Management
Bonus Plan may not exceed 25% of actual EBT for the fiscal year.
Exhibit 4.18



Dear Mr. Uder,



In addition to your employment contract with our Company dated March 1, 2001, and the addendum to your employment contract dated
                        , we hereby clarify:



| | 1. | The term Company in the Change of Control definition of your employment contract refers to QIAGEN N.V.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



QIAGEN GmbH



Managing Director



I agree with the above provision:



|               |  |   |  |                      
|-------------- |  | - |  | ---------------------
|               |  |  
|/s/ Bernd Uder |  | , |  | dated October 9, 2003
|               |  |  
|Bernd Uder     |  |   |  |                      
|Employee       |  |   |  |
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1282 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to require the Secretary of Energy 

to consider the objective of improving the conversion, use, and storage 

of carbon dioxide produced from fossil fuels in carrying out research 

and development programs under that Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 11, 2015 

Mr. MANCHIN (for himself and Ms. HEITKAMP) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to require the 

Secretary of Energy to consider the objective of improving the conversion, use, and storage of carbon dioxide 

produced from fossil fuels in carrying out research and 

development programs under that Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FOSSIL ENERGY. 

4 Section 961(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 

5 U.S.C. 16291(a)) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1282 IS

1 ‘‘(8) Improving the conversion, use, and storage 

2 of carbon dioxide produced from fossil fuels.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00313-CV

In the INTEREST OF M.H., a Child

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009-CI-15779

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

We ORDER appellant, Linda Fuentes, bear all costs of this appeal.

SIGNED June 18, 2014.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-20-0000572

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

CHRISTINE DEAN, Appellant-Appellant, v.

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES ADULT PROTECTION SERVICES,

Appellee-Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 1CC191001357)

ORDER OF CORRECTION

(By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Summary Disposition Order

of the court filed on June 25, 2024, is corrected by adding to

the top of each page of the Summary Disposition Order the

verbiage "NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND

PACIFIC REPORTER".

The Clerk of the Court is directed to incorporate the

foregoing change in the original summary disposition order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 26, 2024.

FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Associate Judge

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-20-0000572

26-JUN-2024

08:05 AM

Dkt. 61 OCOR
;

MEMORANDUM TO:

To note.

GENERAL N. F. TWINING

POW OF.IFF. USAF

DATE 18 July 1955

DCS/Operations

I understand that action has been taken

as indicated in the memorandum from the Secretary

of the Air Force.

iteet2At4442.- kct.uitifre,

111&444-

IMO

:•7='Jr.."

• a

.4 •
•

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

WASHINGTON

OPPICE OP' TM IIIICIIRTANY

j

e,444 2.11 11.‘

KINORANDISI FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

In regard to a special project in which Colonel

Ritland is involved, I have had certain conversations

with Allen Dulles which lead me to the conclusion

that the operational phase of this project should be

carried on as a joint task force operation between

the Air Force and CIA. Inasmuch as Colonel Ritland

is completely familiar with all the technical and

operational aspects of this project, it is requested

that he be assigned to head the Air Force portion of

the task force. CIA has agreed to assign him as

commander of the operational portion of the project,

with operational control over both Air Force and CIA

personnel.

It is important that the various support elements

of the Air Force be informed of this decision and that

support be provided this project on the highest possible priority.

•

Jy-Tsc

1111111r c':c TS 4-1ga.5
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

      ( print page 8716)    
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, February 19, 2015 at 2:00 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Piwowar, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: February 12, 2015.

Brent J. Fields, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-03405 Filed 2-13-15; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY 

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE 

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498 

 OFFICE OF 

 AIR AND RADIATION 

March 12, 2012 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Meeting with Blue-Green Alliance and others to discuss the EPA/NHTSA 

Proposed Rulemaking for Greenhouse Gas and CAFE Standards for Light-Duty 

Vehicles 

FROM: Gloria Helfand 

 Environmental Protection Specialist 

 Assessment and Standards Division 

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799 

This memo documents a meeting held on March 12, 2012, between representatives of the BlueGreen Alliance (BGA), people from affiliated organizations, and EPA to discuss economic 

impact analyses in EPA’s proposed greenhouse gas emission standards for light-duty vehicles. 

The discussion topics were the impacts of the rule on vehicle sales and employment. 

The meeting attendees included the following: 

Robert McCullough, BGA 

Chris Busch, BGA 

Brad Markal, United Auto Workers 

Luke Tonachel, Natural Resources Defense Council 

David Friedman, Union of Concerned Scientists 

Ann Mesnikoff, Sierra Club 

Jesse Prentice-Dunn, Sierra Club 

Jeff Alson, EPA 

William Charmley, EPA 

Gloria Helfand, EPA 

Michael Shelby, EPA
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF THE REGISTRANT,
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Dynamex Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the COMPANY), on Form 10-K for the period ended July 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the REPORT), Ray
E. Schmitz, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ RAY E. SCHMITZRay E. SchmitzVice President and Chief Financial OfficerOctober 14, 2004
 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
 2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ Michael J. McCannMichael J. McCannChief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

      ( print page 7420)    

# TIME AND DATE:

February 11, 2015, 10:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.

# PLACE:

Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD.

# STATUS:

Commission Meeting (Briefing)—Open to the Public.

# MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:

Briefing Matter: Final Regulation: Safety Standard for Frame Child Carriers.

The staff will brief the Commission on establishing a mandatory safety standard for frame child carriers pursuant to section 104 of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008. This would incorporate the applicable voluntary standard without any modifications. The Commission's regulations for Requirements Pertaining to Third Party Conformity Assessment Bodies would also change to include the mandatory safety standard for frame child carriers in the list of Commission-issued Notice of Requirements.

                        A live webcast of the meeting can be viewed at                         *www.cpsc.gov/​live.*

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Rockelle Hammond, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

Dated: February 4, 2015.

Alberta E. Mills,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-02605 Filed 2-6-15; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
E TE M. ZUC

Secrets. of the Air Force

No: 115.1

DATE:* July 25, 1361

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE

ORDER

SUBJECT: Or;Anization and Functions of the Office of Missile

/17.0 Satellite Systems

There is hereby established the Office of Missile and

Satellite Systems in the Office of the Secretary of the Air

Force.

The Director of the Office of Missile and Satellite

Systems is primarily responsible for aisistinz, the Secretary

Lischarlik; his responsibility for the carecticn, supervisic.. ant.; eoi:trol of the SANS Proiect. He is responsi:Jle

for mai,..tai7.1cz liaison with the Office, Secretary of Defense

other 1.terestec Governmental agencies on matters relative •

to his assied responsibilities. He may be assigneci additional

uuties ..eawet: appropriate by the Secretary of the Air Force.

3, Secretary of the Air Force Order No. 115.1, dated

Au.lust 31, 1S60, is hereby supersede,:.

MIMS .- 0-1111t. Ili AIN as
PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# NRO launches new, modern and dynamic web experience on NRO.gov

NRO launches new, modern and dynamic web experience on NRO.govSee the Press Release

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03280**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  03280\03280_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement x 03280\03280_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03280\03280_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 03280\03280_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 03280\03280_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03280\03280_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03280\03280_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03280\03280_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03280\03280_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03280\03280_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

03280\Supporting Documents\03280_Map1 3280 Honolulu.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 03280\Supporting Documents\03280_Map2 3280 Honolulu.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03280\Supporting Documents\03280_Part C Comments.pdf Plant submitted survey file x 03280\Supporting Documents\03280_WB1 3280 Honolulu.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111411 

IOP SEGR~T _ HANDLE V!A 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

/, NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

THE NRO STAFF October 1, 1969 

HANDLE VIA 

1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IIIIII Ill llll 14 00060388D 

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. McLUCAS 

SUBJECT: Meeting of the 303 Committee, September 23 

Attached is the minute for the subject meeting. Mr. Frank 

Hand (Mr. Packard's assistant for 303 Committee matters) 

called to debrief me on yesterday's meeting of the 303 Committee. 

Two items of NRO interest were discussed: 

1. The continuing evaluation of the photo reconnaissance 

drone program over S. China: Mr. Mitchell summarized the 

discussions by asking for a review and response to what he considered the two critical questions: 

a. Is the intelligence being sought really important? 

b. Is it worth the political risk? 

If the answer to both questions is affirmative, then the Committee 

plans to prepare a paper which describes for the President the 

capabilities of the SR-71, drones and the U-2 for this collection 

effort. 

2. The NRP Annex to the STG Report: Dr. Kissinger reported 

that the President had approved the NRP Annex and had confirmed 

the Committee's direction that it not be presented to the STG. 

As an aside, Mr. Hand mentioned that Mr. Mitchell had reviewed the Annex and had indicated that he felt the Annex was a 

very informative and useful summary. 

CONTROL NO ______ _ 

BYEMAN fOP SECRET COPY ___ OF ___ COPtES 

CONTROL SYSTEM EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

DOD DIRECTIVE 5200.10 DOES NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111411 

PAGE ___ OF ___ PAGES 
HA.NOLE VIA 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111411 

lm'-SECJlQ 

We will be receiving the minute of the September 30 meeting 

in a few days. 

Colonel, USAF 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

CONTROL NO _______ _ 

BYEMAN IOP SECRET COPY ____ OF ____ COPIES 

CONTROL SYSTEM EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

000 DIRECTIVE 5200 10 DOES NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111411 

PAGE ____ OF ____ PAGES
•

)41•IIMMOn

DATE: 7 41 y

- .

•

-

SIGNATURE

APPROVAL

COMMENTS

COORDINATION

ACTION

INFORMATION

TICKLER 

RETURN TO

FILE

•

r••

SIMPRNAR

OvEltSSA3 P Races. im 

C FNTL eC $

/0V r6"' To pisroot,r/4, A, 4"

/540'49 ... 5:s 10)0.0.14.6 ;14,46 PA0041/4

poi Pis cot 70 2 sm J,fM Arrg sevom,i,

BY pie

CO:nDIE NTS I DIRECTION :

Lt.:414,17 

.:,... ‘t. ,d ,...,-e. e.44. f &I ,„.r.e

.. • ...„,... ' 1 Ai 11164~...

, 

(0....44.4-;•Zirrt, ? ) 'i AL

. A.. /U. 4t...4 1 c ( dig. .4.4......,,,

f

tt

6.4.6. e....... /7 Di 4 'i fry" 12 .tos lift.

C's" C

M g SINSEL 1414.1 THZ AcTioN

itiFSA'a s 1 • SSO AND SPO HANDLING ONLY 
d tr d sig.Z,14 DATE : •

SIGNATURE

TICKLER APPROVAL RETURN TO COMMENTS

FILE

COORDINATION

ACTION

INFORMATION

gb• k3 PROCESSING

C Ar 712 S

S S BY

COMMENTS/DIRECTION: 2 /;1412 7'-/

.--- z 3 5 e. Gr 7 79 /

/ 5 e, /3 L C- c /e 7/1e-

-TOP-SRO11

Executive Ruiz:tent

CS.:.": DID

SSO AND SPO HANDLING ONLY
40P-SECIff

.11.14 )I 1 1 .a• ea

C t fill

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR

iSt NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D C.

MEMORANDUM FOR ADMIRAL DE POIX, DIA

SUBJECT: Overseas Processing and Interpretation Centers

As you are aware, the National Reconnaissance Office has

supported the two Overseas Processing and Interpretation

Centers in Asia and Europe, based upon policies and procedures

contained in USIB-D-46.1/2, June 21, 1967. Our interest in

the OPIC operation has been in the potential support required

to process imagery for missions flown under NRO auspices.

Historically there has been only slight need for OPIC

support to NRO missions. Flights have been conducted only

infrequently, and have, selectively, been processed at

Eastman Kodak in lieu of using the OPICS.

The National Reconnaissance Program Executive Committee

decided in October and November 1973 to consolidate all U-2

assets within the Air Force which will result in abolishing

the IDEALIST fleet. This will result in no operating aircraft funded by the NRO; however, the Secretary of the Air

Force has agreed to make them available to carry out any

future missions of this nature over denied territories.

For these reasons NRO support to the OPICS is no longer

viable, and funds for further provisions for OPIC support

have been deleted from the NRP. All equipment which has

been furnished by the NRO to the OPICS will be left in place,

but we will not be in a position to provide maintenance,

personnel, or other support in the future.

I plan to continue NRO support for the remainder of this

Fiscal Year, but not beyond. This will require modification

•

LI &

44 GOP, NS/ sec...sue • cm, lear r

Well

GI %4 omit

t •ICt.f.41. osto tva el or uftcail

et" LO•11 Out I 04

Vi MP? HOY

-TOP-SECRETCONTROL 

COPT Ofr COPIES

PAGE __OF , 7 PAGES
• TOP-Sitiff

of the chartering document, USU.-D-46.1/2, and I have directed

the NRO Staff to work with the COMIREX for this purpose. I am

confident that revised procedures can be implemented which will

satisfy the national mission charged to the OPICS.

James W. Plummer

cc: Chairman, COMIREX

AF/ IN

Delete.00443.••••• •41,

00%11441 "0

co'..01 COP.' to

PACT _ 01 PAC:L%
c 03i) 4.n

•

2.7

TIN 'O7 THE FIRST SIAN44.ABdOSTER..1(.

0-4,74,g oreoL.

• . 

SECOND ATTEMPT PROM VAT

• AT 13404. PST: ON 28 FEBRUARY 1463;

• 

A.0+LINCE.OBISCTIMFS.-.WERE- NOTs.A.0112VED

THOL.01000.11171,

•

"

S.

S.
.. .Y.') •

to , •• .7.1. •

-;f::

i!

•

•

:!•;

I

IRrfa

• ••• V • a. •

eir:44.•^t

'MIXIT NORM&1 S AND

'•u." • +;1V • . ; • -

,

:1111141t-szAlitt

; ":t17

- "3:RR/AK.;

*4

Iiimtputinont:Poliiitsme.orreaki tjpoi4o
.••

'V0 .1.7•11r

.

. • 4 1ND

."..14.11111r

••.?;

"SteCitilk .

?

;

.r•

•

•

- 

, • .• • - ••

,

... , • • • • ussEiNfiti

4.:.•:•:7 • ••••

: FIERsolitraPs

" ' •••••e: .1.11•• •

C

•

•'•

•

•.,

•

•

.,

v+4. ::

. T,d0 .. n•

• ;/. 'i•

..••

•

••
.c? 1:4 ik • ••• • .....4);••-,