alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
8 June 2010

Mr Paul Gretch

Director

Office of International Aviation

US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE

Washington DC 20590

Dear Paul, 

CHARTER OPERATIONS BETWEEN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE UNITED 

STATES OF AMERICA

This letter is to confirm that the UK Government, on the basis of reciprocity, 

will approve requests from US-designated airlines to perform fifth, sixth and 

seventh freedom charter operations on the understanding that the US Government 

will approve similar requests from UK-designated airlines. 

The UK Government also confirms that approval for similar charter operations by US 

airlines to the UK's Overseas Territories will also be granted, where reciprocity 

applies.

Yours sincerely,

Judith

Judith Ritchie

First Secretary (Transport Policy)

cc: Mary Street, DoT

 James Gilderoy, DfT London 

Tel: (202) 588-6696

Fax: (202) 588-7901

E-mail: Judith.Ritchie@fco.gov.uk
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/25

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.50 N 76.81 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★ ■

■

■

■

★

●

●

●

●

★ ● ●

●

●
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7284

HUGH ROYAL EPPS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; MLP VICARTHUR FACTORA; DR. 

KATHERINE LAYBOURNE; FBOP REGIONAL MEDICAL STAFF, Etc.; 

FBOP WARDEN; DR. KHAN; DR. KALUR,

Defendants - Appellees, 

and

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Medical Staff at FCI Low,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-00646-HEH-RCY)

Submitted: January 9, 2020 Decided: January 16, 2020

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Hugh Royal Epps, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Hugh Royal Epps appeals the district court’s memorandum opinions and orders 

dismissing his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2018), and denying Epps’ 

motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Epps v. United States, No. 3:17-cv-00646-HEH-RCY (E.D. Va. Feb. 6, 2019; Aug. 26, 

2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
wrt

:
= ie iit
£ | : |
sia
ae
Hay : Hi
: | i TE i ty H al ca
ayy Hy tite Hie tE oui 3
: | Hae ile; s 2
nies 2
ei
Me Ut
i |: Be
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1890

SEDGEWICK HOMES, LLC,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHRISTOPHER BART BIVINS; GRETCHEN WYNE BIVINS; JOSEPH LYNN 

SHOEMAKER; EMILY GROCE SHOEMAKER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of South Carolina, at 

Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (5:16-cv-00049-GCM)

Submitted: January 28, 2021 Decided: February 8, 2021

Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

W. Thad Adams, III, Samuel A. Long, Jr., Christina D. Trimmer, Lucas D. Garber, 

SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant.

Gary L. Beaver, NEXSEN PRUET PLLC, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Sedgewick Homes, LLC, appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellees’ 

motions for attorney’s fees and costs under 17 U.S.C. § 505. We review an award of 

attorney’s fees for abuse of discretion. See Zoroastrian Ctr. & Darb-E-Mehr of Metro. 

Wash., D.C. v. Rustam Guiv Found. of N.Y., 822 F.3d 739, 754 (4th Cir. 2016). We have 

thoroughly reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, and we find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Sedgewick Homes, LLC v. Bivins, 

No. 5:16-cv-00049-GCM (W.D.N.C. July 17, 2019). We decline to award additional 

attorney’s fees on appeal. 4th Cir. R. 46(e). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,967
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,631
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,325
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,673
<PP&E>                                          24,805
<DEPRECIATION>                                (19,479)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,878
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,196
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            50
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,641
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,878
<SALES>                                         15,952
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,939
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   278
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 967
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,041
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,427
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,614
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,614
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40


</TABLE>
the intermediary of the NRO). forleitZCopy

.

41 Is 

•

. . •

.7

•

13 January 1964

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 

1111 04 6 74/ AN

This memorandum summarizes the discussion that I had

with Mr. McCone at lunch on the afternoon of January 13, 1964.

I expressed to Mr. McCone my interest in arriving at an early

resolution of some of the problems which interfere with the proper

relationship with the elements that compose the NRO..

I suggested that one way of resolving this problem would

be to assign to the CIA the responsibility for • the research, develop-

.

meat, engineering and the early flights of a new payload aimed

with a follow- uggested that this program come about

as a natural cons of the basic studies now being carried on

by the Drell Committee. I further suggested that, after the first

4 or 5 successful flights, a smooth transition take place between CIA

management of the payload and payload integration into a "routine"

operational set-up under the detailed control of the Air Force but

still subordinate to Plans and Policies direction from both the Director

of Central Intelligence Agency and the Secretary of Defense (utilizing

•
2 -

•

•

eRETis•

further suggested that as a part of this agreement

the same rule be applied to the CORONA program that I was

proposing for this by this it is

intended that the "keep well" steps necessary to maintain the

efficiency and effectiveness of the CORONA program be made

unmistakably part of the Air Force's responsibilities. -To the

extent however that additional research, development and engineering

work appears necessary in the existing payloads to eliminate defects

or make substantial improvements, that the capabilities of the CIA

must be employed. Thus, the principle would be established that,

despite the fact that transition to the Air Force of a project has

taken place, still the development team maintains both an interest

and a responsibility toward major improvements (as contrasted

with routine, "keep well" engineering operations).

The above plan is designed to utilise to the maximum

extent (as provided in the NRO Agreement) the unique capability of

CIA which has been demonstrated in the past in various advanced

developments as well as the strength, organization and capability of

the Air Force which is uniquely equipped to carry on operations

which have reached a character of routine.
engineering and early test flights of a followthe same procedure toward the NRO'that the'CLA has in

11111111111111111ir

exactly

.711M111==gmj.

.1111Pr•••n•n••n•n

-t10P-SECRET4

As part of this over-all reassignment of responsibilities

in the NRO management, I stated that it would be expected that the

Air Force would apply itself to the research, development,

EUGENE FUBINI

•

Dictated in Mr. McCone's presence

EF

. n1111WIP°P

".* -" u•—•-• •••—•mn n •—•-•

te'
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTH
PERIOD THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001004317
<NAME> IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                           3,472
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  110,590
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,475)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               144,988
<PP&E>                                         477,889
<DEPRECIATION>                                (98,640)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,287,924
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          116,469
<BONDS>                                        603,063
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           368
<OTHER-SE>                                     483,787
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,287,924
<SALES>                                        378,043
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               378,043
<CGS>                                          189,828
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  330,236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,246
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,676
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,805
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (644)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (13,159)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,803)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.42)


</TABLE>
NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

14675 Lee Road

Chantilly, VA 20151-1715

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release 06-11

Contact: (703) 808-5050 April 14, 2011

NRO SUCCESSFULLY LAUNCHES ABOARD ATLAS V

A National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) payload was successfully launched 

aboard a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket from Space Launch Complex-3,

Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, at 09:24 PDT, on April 14, 2011. 

This is the sixth and final launch during the NRO 50th Anniversary year in 2010-

2011. “It is fitting that NRO celebrates its anniversary in a few months, because 

today culminates one of the most aggressive launch schedules in our history. I

am immensely proud of the contractor and government team who came together 

to support these missions. Their hard work and dedication ensures our Nation’s 

critical edge in space well into the next decade,” said Col Alan Davis, Director of 

the NRO Office of Space Launch. 

The NRO is a joint Department of Defense-Intelligence Community organization 

responsible for developing, launching, and operating America’s signals, imagery, 

and communications satellites to meet the needs of our Nation. 

–NRO–
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

MICROS SYSTEMS, INC.

Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, A.L. Giannopoulos, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of MICROS
Systems, Inc. (Registrant), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based
upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2003 of the Registrant (the Report):

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

|            |  |     |  |                                    
|----------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------
|            |  | /s/ |  | A.L. Giannopoulos                  
|Name:
Date: |  |     |  | A.L. Giannopoulos
February 17, 2004

26
NRO Begins Registration for Annual 

Technology Forum

July 31, 2001 

The 9th annual National Reconnaissance Office Technology Forum will be held at NRO 

Headquarters in Chantilly, Va. Oct. 16-17. 

The NRO's Advanced Systems and Technology Directorate will present programs aimed at 

revolutionizing global reconnaissance from 8 a.m.-5 p.m. each day. The forum is for established 

and potential contractors, U.S. government laboratories and agencies. Sessions are classified and 

are open to U.S. citizens only with the appropriate security clearances. A conference fee will be 

charged and advanced reservations are required because space is limited. Eligible participants 

can register on-line at http://westfieldevents.com/techforum or call 1-800-306-6990, ext. 6209.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,012
<SECURITIES>                                     4,282
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,098
<ALLOWANCES>                                       260
<INVENTORY>                                      2,604
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,266
<PP&E>                                          39,867
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,847
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,352
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           129
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,947
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,765
<SALES>                                          4,821
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,226
<CGS>                                            1,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,480
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,905
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,434
<INCOME-TAX>                                       973
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,461
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,461
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        

</TABLE>
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

November 30 , 2021

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 20

- 00841

- CV

STERLING GREEN COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION , Appellant

V. ROBERT COLLINS, PAMELA ST. CROIX, CATHY HAIRBOTTLE, BR IA N HAIRBOTTLE, AND LIVINGSTON HAMPTON , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018

- 51603

- A

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a n interlocutory order appointing a receiver signed December 4, 202 0

. T ex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(1). On October 27, 2021 , appellant file d a motion to dismiss the ap peal. See Tex. R. App. P.2

42.1 (a)(1) . The motion is granted. The court taxes costs against the appellant. 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

We d i smiss the appeal

. PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Wise, Spain, and Hassan.

1 The only cost s pai d in this court on appeal is the fili ng fee.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              Exhibit 12.1
                                                    Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


                                                                                  For the Years Ended December 31,
                                                                 -----------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                    1999          1998          1997          1996          1995
                                                                 -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
                                                                                           (In thousands)
<S>                                                               <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Pretax income (loss) from continuing operations................   $ 41,584      $(206,291)    $(168,056)    $(87,986)     $(17,233)

Add back:
  Losses from less-than-50.0%-owned persons....................     11,614         10,299         2,408        4,503         4,327
  Minority interest in subsidiary..............................    (18,407)             -        (1,018)           -             -
  Fixed charges:
    Interest, whether expensed or capitalized, including
      amortization of deferred financing costs.................     69,470         56,705        43,994       22,194            30
                                                                  --------      ---------     ---------     --------      --------

Adjusted income (loss).........................................    104,261       (139,287)     (122,672)     (61,289)      (12,876)
Fixed charges..................................................    (69,470)       (56,705)      (43,994)     (22,194)          (30)
                                                                  --------      ---------     ---------     --------      --------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.............................       1.50              -             -            -             -
Amount of coverage deficiency..................................   $      -      $(195,992)    $(166,666)    $(83,483)     $(12,906)
                                                                  ========      =========     =========    =========      ========
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6240

SHERRY VANHOY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; MACK JARVIS;

CAROL CALDWELL,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Paul Trevor Sharp, Magistrate

Judge. (CA-97-762-1)

Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: May 4, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sherry Vanhoy, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe Delforge, III, NORTH

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Vanhoy v. North Carolina Attorney General, No. CA-97-

762-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 1998). We further deny Appellant's motion

for in forma pauperis status and we decline to review any issues

Appellant seeks to raise for the first time on appeal. See Karpel

v. Inova Health Sys. Servs., 134 F.3d 1222, 1227 (4th Cir. 1998).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Unified Western Grocers, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alfred A. Plamann, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the
Report.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 14, 2007



/s/    ALFRED A. PLAMANNAlfred A. Plamann President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)




A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.