alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
/)/97:- NA DIE VIA 

BY MAN 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JUL)/ 2015 --TOP-SEGRET-- 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

-I5+ NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

THE NRO STAFF 19 January 1971 

/ 

M 0 NDUM FOR Dw=memews 

SUBJECT: Project COLT 

REFERENCES: a. 7 Oct 1970 Memo, same subject (TAB A) 

b. 3 Nov 1970 Msg, WHIG 0992 (TAB B) 

c. 10 Dec 1970 Msg, CHARGE 5614 (TAB C) 

BACKGROUND 

Project COLT is a proposal by Dr. Meinel of t e University of Arizona 

The con*truction would 

utilize six (6) surplus 72" DORIAN blanks, and result in an 

In accordance with your approval 

of our recommendation (TAB A), we have instructed SP-6 to investigate a study of feasibility and performance of the 

concept, (TAB B). A Statement of Work has been prepared by 

Dr. Meinel and SP-6 (TAB C) and reviewed by the Staff. This 

work statement details the proposed efforts in the design and 

performance of the optical system and detectors. 

DISCUSSION 

To determine what overlap there might be between this 

project and somewhat similar work being done under 

we discussed the project with 

He pointed out that there is effectively no overlap, and that 

certain aspects of Project COLT complement the work being done 

for him; specifically. the use of Project COLT as a 

contracts. 

We feel that Project COLT offers these advantages: 

1.111.11.11=11111111111111111111111111111111111.111 

b. Utilization of salvaged DORIAN blanks permits 

construction of a large aperture system at reduced cost. 

HANDLE vIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

TOP SECRET 

ETCLL,DED PROM AUTON/01C REGRADING 

000 DIRECTIVE 5200 10 DOES NOT APPLY 

CONTROL NO INTERNAL 

COPY 1 or 2 COPIES 
NRO APPROVED FQR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

40P4EGRET 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

The proposed statement of work (TAB C) will address the 

questions of feasibility. design fabrication. output and output 

analysis of Upon completion 

of this work, a review of accomplishments and potential will 

indicate advisability of proceeding with a program to build 

the entire COLT system. 

RECOMMENDATION 

Recommend vou authorize SP to contract with Dr. Meiners 

group for the study as outlined in TAB C. 

LAWRENCE E. PENCE 

Captain, USAF 

HANDLE VIA 

10P-SEeliff 

EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

DOD DIRECT,E S200 10 DOES NOT APPLY 

CONTROL N0 INTERNAL 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL. SYSTEM 

COP, 1 Or 2 wpm, 

PAGE 2 Or 2 PAGES 

MYHXYHmr.•
#### Loomis, Appellant, vs. Loomis, Respondent.

*February 21*

March *12, 1912.*

*Separate judgments in one action: Appeal: Immaterial*errors,

One of two defendants who were entitled to a judgment in their favor had a judgment entered in his .favor, ignoring the rights of the other, and a separate judgment was afterwards entered in favor of the other. Upon appeal the latter judgment is affirmed, this court being equally divided upon the question whether the error in entering such "second judgment was one affecting the substantial rights of the plaintiff.

Appeal from a judgment of tlie circuit court for Wash-burn county: Ebakk A. Eoss, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

The cause was submitted for the appellant on the. briefs of *A. L.*Bugbee, and for the respondent on the brief of *W. N. Fuller.*

Bashes, J.

The facts pertaining to the appeal are fully •stated in *Loomis v. Besse,*decided herewith *(ante,*p. 64/7). ■Whether or not the complaint stated a cause of action against the above named defendant is now wholly immaterial. 1 The plaintiff sought to recover damages against the two defendants for a single wrong. A jury has passed upon that issue in the *Besse Gase*and has awarded plaintiff what it deemed to be full compensation for that wrong. That judgment has been paid by offsetting the nominal damages recovered against the costs awarded to Besse. Plaintiff apparently made no •objection to such offset. Manifestly, the plaintiff’s cause of action is thereby extinguished, and no further right of action •exists-against the defendant *Loomis.-*Cooley, Torts (3d ed.) 233 *et seq.,*and cases cited in note 71, p. 233, note 78, p. 234, •and note 79, p. 235. So it is a moot question whether or not the complaint states a cause of action against *Loomis.*Plaintiff, however, insists that there was no warrant in law for the *654entry of tbis second judgment and tbat therefore it must be reversed.

Justice ViNJE was disqualified from sitting in tbis case. The Chief J ustice, J ustice Mabshaxx, and the writer are of the opinion that the fact that the *Loomis*judgment was entered separately is an error in procedure which does not affect the substantial rights of the party seeking to reverse the judgment, and that therefore the error should be regarded as immaterial under sec. 3072m, Stats. (Laws of 1909, ch. 192). Justices SiebecKeb, KeRwiN, and Timlin are of the opinion that the failure to conform to statutory provisions such as those contained in secs. 2882 and 2883, Stats. (1898), cannot be considered an immaterial error, and that as to an error such as that complained of sec. 3072m has no application; and furthermore, that the substantial rights of the appellant were injuriously affected by the second judgment because it. necessitated incurring the extra expense of taking two appeals instead of one, which would be wholly lost if the judgment were affirmed. This judgment must therefore be affirmed *ex necessitate*and without any discussion save a bare statement of the lines of reasoning which led to the division indicated.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.

■ViNJE, J., took no part.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1415 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1415

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the definition of 
     large employer for purposes of applying the employer mandate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2015

Ms. Heitkamp (for herself and Mr. King) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the definition of 
     large employer for purposes of applying the employer mandate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Stability Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF LARGE EMPLOYER DEFINITION FOR PURPOSES OF THE 
              EMPLOYER MANDATE.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 4980H(c) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``50 full-time 
        employees'' and inserting ``101 full-time employees''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B)--
                    (A) in clause (i)--
                            (i) by striking ``50 full-time employees'' 
                        each place it appears and inserting ``100 full-
                        time employees''; and
                            (ii) in subclause (II), by striking ``in 
                        excess of 50'' and inserting ``in excess of 
                        100''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(iii) Eligible to purchase in small group 
                        market.--
                                    ``(I) In general.--This section 
                                shall not apply to a small employer 
                                that is eligible to purchase a 
                                qualified health plan in the small 
                                group health insurance market.
                                    ``(II) Definitions.--In this 
                                clause, the terms `small employer' and 
                                `small group market' shall have the 
                                meanings given such terms in section 
                                1304 of the Patient Protection and 
                                Affordable Care Act.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to months beginning after December 31, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
.. ,~ 

~------

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05115215 

l'oi:'jECftEf ,T AGBOARD GAMBIT Hand!tl via BYE 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORcGontrul System 

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE 

WASHINGTON. D.C. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!IIIIIIIIIIIII 1400031530D 

19 October 1970 

MEMORANDUM FOR SAFSS (COL SWEENEY) 

JRC/JCS (I '---------~ 

SUBJECT: TAGBOARD Test 

A TAG BOARD test flight (nickname STICK SHIFT) is planned over 

Alaska during 21-24 October 1970. The TAGBOARD launch will be on a 

non-interference basis with the scheduled GAMBIT 'launch. 

A profile of the drone's flight path over Alaska and the 

recovery area is attached. The launch of the drone from the B-52 

occurs in Warning area w-260 off the coast of California West of 

San Francisco. 

Proposed launch time is 2030Z, total time of drone flight 91 

minutes. 

PMR is the lead range for the test operation. Two of their 

EC-121 Command & Control aircraft will operate from NAS Whidbey 

Island (North of Seattle) and two from Elmendorf AFB, Alaska. The 

JC-130 recovery force will also operate out of Elmendorf AFB. 

Program D) through JRC/JCS, will coordinate support requirements 

and radar reporting directly with NORAD, ALCOM, ADC and AAC. 

The drone's flight path approaches no closer than 300 miles to 

the closest Soviet radar site which should place it outside of 

their detection range. 

The take from the test mission will be flown to Rochester for 

processing. 

Request JRC coordinate with NSA and SAFSS-4 coordinate with overhead systems to make sure appropriate collection agencies are aware 

of the TAGBOARD flight in case there is any reaction. For your informa,-

tion the drone will be transmitting TM on either 48.6MHz or 253.8MHz. 

1 Attachment 

Flight path 

w. , JR. 

Colonel, USAF 

Director, Program D 

Handle via DYEMflJl 

Control System. 

GBOARO GAMBIT 

BYE-12368-70 

<;y-s- ..... _------_ ..... ~-.~--.-.- ... ~ .. ---- .. " ...... I.~. 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05115215 

-
.,, ; /"1' ''\. I 'I,l/J\·:I) '''/\::'''I?'ll"''A"'' ~,.,.\, .', \," ;.,.;'<)01 )., '/lvK~" :..f{'<, " " . ,~-".,rl".,. 01 •••• \1. ..... '.':;'. _ .. '~. ,'.1 , 

pproved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05115215 " ,· ....... r U.Jvv,'':,J f(,: " . ,I,' • ~ , " . }~' 4f. ii'
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: ORDER AMENDING RULES 512 , 610, AND 612 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF JUVENILE COURT PROCEDURE : : : : : : : : NO. 737 SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET

**ORDER**
**PER CURIA M**  **AN D NOW** , this 11 th day of May, 201 7 , upon the recommendation of the Juvenile Court Procedural Rules Committee , the proposal having been published for public comment at 46 Pa.B. 3944 (July 23, 2016) : It is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania that Rules 512 , 610, and 612 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Juvenile Court Procedure are amended in the attached form. This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall be effective on October 1 , 2017

.
Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined. Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 37 (Wednesday, February 25, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 10203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03827]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: 30-Day notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Small Business Administration (SBA) is publishing this 
notice to comply with requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) 
(44 U.S.C. Ch. 35), which requires agencies to submit proposed 
reporting and recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and 
approval, and to publish a notice in the Federal Register notifying the 
public that the agency has made such a submission. This notice also 
allows an additional 30 days for public comments.

DATES: Submit comments on or before March 27, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the information collection by name 
and/or OMB Control Number and should be sent to: Agency Clearance 
Officer, Curtis Rich, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street 
SW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20416; and SBA Desk Officer, Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 
New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Curtis Rich, Agency Clearance Officer, 
(202) 205-7030 [email protected].
    Copies: A copy of the Form OMB 83-1, supporting statement, and 
other documents submitted to OMB for review may be obtained from the 
Agency Clearance Officer.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This information collection is provided by 
SBA lenders and borrowers to provide basic loan information and 
certifications regarding the disbursement of loan proceeds. SBA relies 
on this information during the guaranty purchase review process as a 
component in determining whether to honor a loan guaranty.

Solicitation of Public Comments

    Comments may be submitted on (a) whether the collection of 
information is necessary for the agency to properly perform its 
functions; (b) whether the burden estimates are accurate; (c) whether 
there are ways to minimize the burden, including through the use of 
automated techniques or other forms of information technology; and (d) 
whether there are ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of 
the information.

Summary of Information Collections

    Title: Settlement Sheet.
    Description of Respondents: SBA Lenders and Borrowers.
    Form Number: SBA Form 1050.
    Estimated Annual Respondents: 15,000.
    Estimated Annual Responses: 15,000.
    Estimated Annual Hour Burden: 3,800.

Curtis B. Rich,
Management Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2015-03827 Filed 2-24-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            49,157
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    111,650
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                      329,827
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 726,542
<PP&E>                                         2,356,992
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,268,964
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   819,561
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            330,000
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                      11,129,954
<OTHER-SE>                                   (10,609,154)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     819,561
<SALES>                                          218,401
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 218,401
<CGS>                                            214,206
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    214,206
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 195,230
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                (191,035)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (191,035)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (191,035)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     400,391
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.18
        



</TABLE>
IC 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1463 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2015 

Referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

AN ACT 

To amend the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability 

Act of 2014 to modify the distance requirement for expanded availability of hospital care and medical services 

for veterans through the use of agreements with nonDepartment of Veterans Affairs entities. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

S 1463 RFH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Access to Community 

5 Care for Veterans Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF DISTANCE REQUIREMENT FOR 

7 EXPANDED AVAILABILITY OF HOSPITAL 

8 CARE AND MEDICAL SERVICES FOR VET9 ERANS THROUGH THE USE OF AGREEMENTS 

10 WITH NON-DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF11 FAIRS ENTITIES. 

12 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section 

13 101(b)(2) of the Veterans Access, Choice, and Account14 ability Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–146; 38 U.S.C. 1701 

15 note) is amended to read as follows: 

16 ‘‘(B) resides more than 40 miles (cal17 culated based on distance traveled) from a med18 ical facility of the Department, including a com19 munity-based outpatient clinic, that is the clos20 est such medical facility to the residence of the 

21 veteran that is able to provide to the veteran 

22 the hospital care or medical services that the 

23 veteran needs;’’. 

24 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

25 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date that is 60 days 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

S 1463 RFH

1 after the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply 

2 with respect to care and services provided under section 

3 101 of the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability 

4 Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–146; 38 U.S.C. 1701 note) 

5 on and after such effective date. 

6 (c) EMERGENCY DESIGNATIONS.— 

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) is designated as an emergency re9 quirement pursuant to section 4(g) of the Statutory 

10 Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (2 U.S.C. 933(g)). 

11 (2) DESIGNATION IN SENATE.—In the Senate, 

12 the amendment made by subsection (a) is designated 

13 as an emergency requirement pursuant to section 

14 403(a) of S. Con. Res. 13 (111th Congress), the 

15 concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 

16 2010. 

Passed the Senate May 22, 2015. 

Attest: JULIE E. ADAMS, 

Secretary. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I N THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

RE APPOINTMENT S TO

CONTINUING JUDICIAL

EDUCATION BOARD OF

JUDGES :

:

:

:

:

:

: NO. 754

SUPREME COURT RULES

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 13 th day of December , 2017, the following members are hereby

reappointed to the Continuing Judicial Education Board of Judges for a term of three

years, commencing January 1, 2018:

Vice Provost Anita LaFrance Allen , University of Pennsylvania

The Honorable John Cleland , Court of Common Pleas, McKean County

Dean Maureen Lally

- Green , Duquesne University School of Law

The Honorable Edward D. Reibman , Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**







CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Lattice Incorporated (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joe
      Noto ,
      Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to Lattice
      Incorporated and will be retained by Lattice Incorporated and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








Dated:
      May 21, 2007





/s/Joe NotoName:Joe
                  Noto
                  Title:
                    Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AS OF
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          26,222
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,013
<INVENTORY>                                     30,654
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               176,948
<PP&E>                                          57,124
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,248
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 266,069
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,491
<BONDS>                                          3,267
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           433
<OTHER-SE>                                     159,344
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   266,069
<SALES>                                         39,251
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,009
<CGS>                                           19,994
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   75,519
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 116
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,532)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (621)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (911)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (919)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>