December 4, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, M-30

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Room W12-140, West Building Ground Floor

Washington, DC 20590-0001

Re: Petition of Skyvision Aerial Images, LLC for an Exemption Pursuant to Section 333 of 

the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 to Operate an Unmanned Aircraft 

System

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the Reform Act) 

and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Skyvision Aerial Images, LLC (“SAI”) hereby applies for an exemption 

from the Federal Aviation Regulations identified below to allow for the commercial operation of 

the DJI PHANTOM 3 (“PHANTOM”), the INSPIRE I (“INSPIRE”) which are manufactured by

DJI Innovations and the Typhoon Q500 (“Q500”) which is manufactured by Yuneec Electric 

Aviation. Where all equipment is being referenced they will be referenced as (“the

EQUIPMENT”)

Summary Grant Approval Request

The petitioner requests the agency issue a summary grant for this application. The 

EQUIPMENT has been approved on numerous petitions. In addition the petitioner is requesting 

to utilize the Phantom 3, Inspire 1, and Q500 for the same purposes as over 1,000 other 

exemptions that pertain to videography and photography.

I. REGULATIONS FOR WHICH EXEMPTION IS REQUESTED

Skyvision Aerial Images requests exemption from the following regulations:

 14 C.F.R Part 21, Subpart H;

 14 C.F.R Part 27;

 14 C.F.R § 45.23(b);

 14 C.F.R. § 45.27(a);

 14 C.F.R § 61.113;

 14 C.F.R § 91.7(a);

 14 C.F.R § 91.9(b)(2);

 14 C.F.R § 91.9(c);

 14 C.F.R § 91.103;

 14 C.F.R § 91.109(a);

 14 C.F.R § 91.119;

 14 C.F.R § 91.121;
 14 C.F.R § 91.151(a) & (b)

 14 C.F.R § 91.203 (a) & (b);

 14 C.F.R § 91.405(a);

 14 C.F.R § 91.407(a)(l);

 14 C.F.R § 91.409(a)(2);

 14 C.F.R § 91.417 (a) & (b).

II. STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR REQUESTED EXEMPTIONS

This petition for exemption is submitted in accordance with Section 333 of the Reform Act. 

Congress has directed the FAA “to safely accelerate the integration of civil unmanned aircraft 

systems into the national airspace system.” Pursuant to Section 333 of the Reform Act, the FAA 

Administrator is to permit operation of an unmanned aircraft system where it does not create a 

hazard to users of the national airspace system (NAS) or the public or pose a threat to national 

security based on the following considerations:

 The size, weight, speed and operational capability;

 Operation in proximity to airports and populated areas; and

 Operation within visual line of sight of the operator.

Furthermore, the Federal Aviation Act grants the FAA Administrator general authority to grant 

exemptions from the agency’s safety regulations and minimum standards when the 

Administrator decides a requested exemption is in the public interest. See 49 U.S.C. §§ 

106(f), 44701-44716, et seq. A party requesting an exemption must explain the reasons why the 

exemption: (1) would benefit the public as a whole, and (2) would not adversely affect safety or 

how it would provide a level of safety at least equal to the existing rules. 14 C.F.R. § 11.81.

III. DESCRIPTION OF SKYVISION AERIAL IMAGES AND ITS SERVICES

SAI seeks to utilize UAV's in order to provide aerial photography/videography services, with a 

wide variety of applications, to private individuals and businesses. SAI intends to provide aerial 

photos and videos for real estate brokers, builders, and other relevant businesses, so they can 

operate their businesses more efficiently. In doing so we will be conducting: home and roof 

inspections, bridge inspections, power line inspections, agricultural inspections, inspections for 

real estate claims, and others.

The contact information for the petitioner, Skyvision Aerial Images, LLC is as follows:

David Samalin

Owner/Operator

Skyvision Aerial Images, LLC

65 High Ridge Rd

Suite 118

Stamford, CT 06905
IV. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED OPERATIONS

SAI is requesting exemptions from applicable Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) pursuant to 

Section 333 of the Reform Act to perform aerial videography and photography for private and 

public events. Specifically, corporate, education, nonprofit, surveying, real estate, insurance 

adjustment, etc.

A. The Aircraft

SAI will operate the DJI PHANTOM 3 (“PHANTOM”), the DJI INSPIRE 1 (“INSPIRE”)

manufactured by DJI Innovations or the Typhoon Q500 which is manufactured by Yuneec 

Electric Aviation.

Yuneec Q500 Typhoon 

The Q500 is a vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) Unmanned Aircraft (UA) with a Ground 

Control Station (GCS) utilizing electronic tablet or smart phone systems. The Q500 UAS is 

equipped with four main electric powered rotors driven by Lithium Polymer batteries.

It is manufactured by Yuneec, Inc. and has the manufacturer’s model designation Q500 

Typhoon. It is an advanced (sUAS) with state of the art safety features, GPS lock, altitude, 

position hold stabilization, smart mode, angle mode follow me and return to home mode. The 

ground station has telemetry with altitude, groundspeed, GPS location and battery life for both 

the transmitter and aircraft as well as an audible and vibration alert for aircraft low battery. 

Aircraft LED visual alert indicators for low battery, GPS loss, and communication loss. The 

UAS has a first person view on the controller that is not to be used for flight by the PIC. The 

UAS has the ability to link with a smartphone or tablet for video link separate from the on board 

display if needed. The UAS has separate radio frequencies for telemetry and video downlink and 

aircraft control. 

1. Aircraft

a. Dimensions 

i. Height 240mm (9.45 in) 

ii. Width 420mm (16.54 in) 

iii. Diagonal Length W\O Rotor Blades 565mm (22.2 in) 

iv. Propeller/Main Rotor Diameter 330mm (13.0 in) 

b. Flight Time up to 25 minutes

c. Weight with Battery and Payload 60.0 oz (1700g)

d. Weight without Battery and Payload 40.0 oz (1130g)

e. Battery 5400mAh 3S 11.1V LiPo (included)

f. Charger 3S 11.1V LiPo DC Balancing Smart Charger with AC Adapter 

(included)

g. Transmitter 10-channel 2.4GHz with 5.8GHz video downlink (included)

h. 3 Flight Modes Smart (Follow Me and Watch Me), Angle and Home
i. Maximum Flying Height Default 122m (400ft) above Ground Level 

(Adjustable via the Typhoon GUI)

j. Maximum Rotation Rate 65°/s

k. Maximum Roll Angle 35°

l. Operating Temperature Range −5°C to 80°C

m. Radio Control Frequency Band 2.4GHz

n. Max. Descent Speed 2m/s

o. Max. Flight Speed 8m/s

2. Gimbal

a. Type CGO3

b. Weight 6.9oz (195g)

c. Focusing System Aerial Optimized Fixed Focus

d. Field of View 115°

e. Video Transmission Range

i. FCC Compliance: Up to 600m (1968.5 ft)

ii. CE Compliance: Up to 300m (984.252 ft) with ST10

f. Video Resolution

i. UHD: 4K at 30FPS, 2.7K at 30FPS, 2.5K at 30FPS

ii. FULL HD: 1080p at 24/25/30/48/50/60/120FPS

g. Photo Resolution 12 Megapixels

h. Storage (memory) microSD Class 10 ~ 4 to 128 GB

i. Control Angle Accuracy ±0.02°

j. White BalanceAutomatic or manual settings

k. Transmission Band 5.2GHz–5.8GHz

l. Input/Operating Voltage 12V

m. Working Temperature −10°C–50°C

n. Storage Temperature −20°C–60°C

o. Angular Vibration Range ±0.02°

p. Control Range

i. Pitch: between −90° and 0° 

ii. Yaw: between 0° and 360°

q. Microphone Yes

r. Camera Lens 0.6in (14mm)/f2.8 (1.4in/35mm)—No distortion

s. Sensor 1/2.3′′ CMOS

3. Personal Ground Station

a. Type ST10+

b. Operating System AndroidTM

c. Number of Channels 10

d. Control Transmission Range (Optimum Conditions)FCC Compliance: Up to 

800m (2624.67 ft) CE Compliance: Up to 400m (1312.34 ft) Warning: You Must 

Follow Local Laws and Maintain Visual Line of Sight of Aircraft at All Times

e. Robust Radio Control Modulation Yuneec Protocol

f. Video Link Frequency Band 5.8GHz

g. Video Transmission Range (Optimum Conditions) FCC Compliance: Up to 

600m (1968.5 ft) CE Compliance: Up to 300m (984.252 ft) Warning: You Must 

Follow Local Laws and Maintain Visual Line of Sight of Aircraft at All Times
h. Flight Systems Telemetry Data On Screen Display Yes

i. LED Backlit LCD Screen Capacitive Multi-touch 5.5′′

j. Tactile (Vibrating) and Audible Feedback Yes

k. Built-in LiPo Battery Voltage / Capacity 3.6V/5200mAh 18.72Wh

l. Screen Resolution 854 × 480px

m. Camera Settings White balance, light exposure, ISO, shutter speed, video 

resolution, FPS, record video, take pictures

The Q500 has been approved for commercial operations in Exemption Nos. 12360, 12730, 

12684, 12680, 12637, 12833, 12923, and 12697.

Phantom and Inspire

The PHANTOM is a battery operated quadcopter with a maximum flight time of 25 minutes. 

The vehicle weighs approximately 2.75 pounds with a maximum takeoff weight of 

approximately 2.75 pounds. It has fixed landing gear, vibration dampers, small frame air incline 

and minimalized gimbal mount, which allows for a 110 degree of view from the camera. 

Although the vehicle’s ground speed has a maximum of 25 mph, it will be operated between 2 

and 25 miles per hour, and it will operate at or below 400 feet AGL. 

The INSPIRE is a battery operated quadcopter with a maximum flight time of 18 minutes. The 

vehicle weighs approximately 5.3 pounds with a maximum takeoff weight of approximately 7.5

pounds. It has retractable landing gear, vibration dampers, small frame air incline and 

minimalized gimbal mount which allows for a 94 degrees of view from the camera. Although 

the vehicle’s ground speed has a maximum of 49 mph, it will be operated between 2 and 25 

miles per hour, and it will operate at or below 400 feet AGL. 

The PHANTOM’s and INPIRE’s manufacturer’s specifications are shown in the Appendix of the 

Quick Start Guide and the USER Manuals for each airframe. 

The UAV/UAS/UA which SAI, Petitioner, will be operating is the DJI Phantom 2, Phantom 3, 

and/or Inspire 1. The inherent safety features, sophistication, programmability, GPS navigation, 

return home capability, airport vicinity no-fly feature and restricted altitude feature, as well as 

differentiating radio frequency (rf) for aircraft controller/receiver and for the camera make this a 

much safer UAV for the purposes of this petition. These are hobby grade radio controlled UAVs

that has the capacity for software upgrades. It is light, less than 3 and 8 pounds respectively

including battery and camera. Incorporated into the programming of the PHANTOM and 

INSPIRE is an automatic return home feature that automatically directs the craft back to point of 

take-off should communication with the transmitter be lost. The Phantom has a cruising speed of 

15 knots, with a maximum speed of 29 knots. Maximum flight time is 25 minutes. Gross weight 

is 2.75 pounds. The Inspire has a cruising speed of 15 knots, with a maximum speed of 42 knots. 

Maximum flight time is 18 minutes. Gross weight is 7.49 pounds.

The PHANTOM and INSPIRE have a communication link between the camera and aircraft 

allowing the operator or Pilot in Command (PIC) to monitor battery level, altitude (AGL), 

distance from PIC, camera imagery, and also control camera angle. The software for the 
PHANTOM and INSPIRE allows the operator or PIC to set maximum altitude AGL for each 

flight, allowing customization of flights to no higher than 100 feet, 150 feet, or 250 feet AGL as

examples. The 400 foot maximum AGL is by default programmed into the UAV's software preflight to insure compliance with FAA standards adding to the safety capabilities of this UAV. 

This UAV is programmed to remain in position when controls are released, maintaining altitude 

and GPS location. 

The PHANTOM and INSPIRE have an altitude and radar monitoring function that allows the 

operator more precise determination of height, direction of flight and distance from the 

operator/PIC. The operator/PIC can monitor GPS lock status while the UAV is in flight, with the 

ability to anticipate loss of GPS locking so the operator/PIC can land the UAV as a precaution. 

Considering the programmability and safety features of these UAVs, it serves as the best option 

to protect the Public and NAS for the purposes of this petition. 

SAI is using a UAV that has the capability for taking off and landing at a single point, identical 

to a helicopter. There are no runways, aided take off apparatuses, nor routes that need to be 

flown to areas being aerial video recorded or photographed. Allowing a reduced and more 

confined area of flight. 

The motors, rotors, propellers, body/frame, landing pads, etc. for the UAV utilized in this 

petition are not complicated. Engineering and design allows layman maintenance. Pre-flight 

inspections for cracks, damage or other physical conditions that could hamper safe flight will be 

conducted prior to any and all missions. Post flight inspections will also be conducted in order to 

aid in identifying flight conditions that may cause stress to propellers, landing gear, etc. 

Thorough inspection of the UAV shall be conducted and flight response tested should a hard 

landing or crash occur insuring that the UAV can operate in a safe manner before conducting any

further missions. 

Petitioner SAI requests modification, waiver or exemption and clarification (within reason) 

concerning section 91.119 prohibition of flight in congested areas. Petitioner SAI requests 

waiver for this condition to allow reasonable and responsible videography in congested areas of 

subdivisions and neighborhoods. 

In compliance with Section 90.151 (a) the EQUIPMENT is a battery operated UAV/UAS with 

battery level monitoring capability. Fully charged battery flight time is rated at 25 and 18

minutes respectively, with videos/photos taking much less time to record. Operator or PIC is 

warned when battery level is low. 

Petitioner SAI requests waiver/exemption from Section 91.203 (a) since the Phantom is a hobby

grade UAV/UAS that should not require an airworthiness certificate. Posting of special flight 

authorization would not be possible since the EQUIPMENT has no cabin and are not large 

enough to carry a certificate. However, a special flight authorization can be maintained by the 

operator to make available upon request.
B. SAI Proposed Operations Demonstrate an Equivalent Level of Safety

1. General Description of Proposed Flight Operations

SAI proposes to operate within the limitations and performance specifications listed in the USER 

MANUALS, which are summarized below. These limitations provide for at least an equivalent, 

or higher, level of safety for operations under the current regulatory structure because the 

proposed operations represent a safety enhancement to the protocols.

The proposed operations do not create any hazard to users of the national airspace system or pose 

a threat to national security. The aircraft is a battery operated quadcopter with a maximum flight 

time of 18-25 minutes. The vehicle weighs approximately 2.75 – 7.50 pounds. It has vibration 

dampers and small frame air incline. The vehicle’s ground speed has a maximum of 25-49 mph 

but it will be operated between 2 and 25 miles per hour, and it will operate at or below 200 feet 

AGL. 

Manned aircraft are at risk of fuel spillage and fire in the event of an incident or accident. The

EQUIPMENT carries no fuel, and therefore the risk of fire following an incident or accident due 

to fuel spillage is eliminated. Compared to manned aircraft, the unmanned aircraft being 

operated by the petitioner reduces the risk to participating persons in close proximity to the 

aircraft due to the limited size, weight, operating conditions, and design safety features of the

EQUIPMENT.

The FAA has determined that the risk of not having an electronic means to monitor and 

communicate with other aircraft, such as transponders or sense and avoid technology, is 

mitigated by placing limits on altitude, requiring stand-off distance from clouds, permitting 

daytime operations only, requiring that the aircraft be operated within visual line of sight, and 

requiring the EQUIPMENT to yield right of way to all other manned operations. Additionally, 

the operator will request a NOTAM prior to operations to alert other users of the 

NAS. See Exemption No. 11062, Docket No. FAA 2014-0352, at p. 13.

The petitioner’s aircraft has the capability to operate safely after experiencing certain in- flight 

failures, as specified in the USER MANUAL regarding Return to Home (RTH) specifically low 

battery RTH and failsafe RTH. The aircraft is also able to respond to a lost-link event with a precoordinated, predictable, automated flight maneuver.

2. Reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the 

exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to the existing rule. 

Given the small size involved, the restricted environment within which they will operate, the 

procedures listed below, and pilot certification requirements, SAI proposed operations using the

EQUIPMENT would “not create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public 

or pose a threat to national security.” Reform Act Section 333(b) (1).

1. The aircraft will be identified by serial number, registered with the FAA, and 

have identification (N-Number) markings as large as practicable.
2. Flights will be operated within visual line of sight of the pilot in command (PIC).

3. Prior to each flight, a zero altitude initiation point will be established and 

confirmed for accuracy by PIC.

4. Maximum flight time for each operational flight will be approximately 15-20 

minutes.

5. The aircraft will be safely landed with no less than the greater of (a) 20% battery

life remaining or (b) three minutes of flight time remaining.

6. The aircraft will be operated during daylight and in VFR conditions.

7. Flights will be operated at a lateral distance of at least 50 feet from any persons or 

property not associated with the operation who have not given prior permission.

8. Flights will be limited to a groundspeed of 2-25 mph.

9. Minimum crew for each flight will consist of a PIC and an Observer.

10. The PIC will possess at least a sport pilot certificate and a valid state driver’s 

license. 

11. Any designee from SAI will have completed a Basic Operator Course for the

EQUIPMENT. 

12. Prior to the flight, a Mission Plan will be created setting forth the limitations for 

the flight as well as contact information for the PIC.

13. The flight operations will yield the right of way to other manned aircraft 

operations.

14. All persons who are not involved with flight operations will be required to stay 50

feet from the edge of the flight operation perimeter. 

15. SAI will provide NOTAM details to the FAA 24 hours prior to each flight.

16. All required permissions and permits will be obtained from territory, state, county

or city jurisdictions prior to flight.

17. Prior to commencing operations, SAI will obtain a Certificate of Waiver or 

Authorization (COA) from the FAA if flying above 200 feet AGL.

18. If the aircraft loses communications, it will have the capability to return to a predetermined location within the operational area and land.

19. If the aircraft loses its GPS signal it will have the capability of being flown 

manually to a predetermined location within the operational area and land.

20. The flight will be aborted in case of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

21. Each flight will be recorded in an Operations Log Book.

24. Maintenance on the aircraft will be recorded in a Maintenance Log Book.

3. Flight Recovery, Lost Communications, and Lost GPS Procedures

The flight recovery, lost communications, and lost GPS procedures are fully documented in the 

attached User Manuals.

V. SPECIFIC FAR EXEMPTIONS REQUESTED

SAI seeks an exemption from several interrelated provisions of 14 C.F.R. Parts 21, 45, 61, and 

91 for purposes of conducting the requested operations using the EQUIPMENT. Listed below 

are (1) the specific FAR sections for which exemption is sought, and (2) the operating 
procedures and safeguards that SAI has established which will ensure a level of safety better than 

or equal to the rules from which exemption is sought. See 14 C.F.R. § 11.81 (e).

A. 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H – Airworthiness Certificates and 14 C.F.R. 

§ 91.203(a)(1)

The FAA has stated that no exemption is needed from this section if a finding is made under the 

Reform Act that the UAS selected provides an equivalent level of safety when compared to 

aircraft normally used for the same application. These criteria are met, and therefore no 

exemption is needed. See Grant of Exemption to Astraeus Aerial, Docket No. FAA 2014-

0352 at 13-14, 22. If, however, the FAA determines that there are some characteristics of the 

PHANTOM that fail to meet the requirements of the Reform Act, an exemption is requested.

Equivalent Level of Safety: The EQUIPMENT are safe when taking into account its size, 

weight, speed, and operational capability. The EQUIPMENT weighs approximately 2.75 pounds 

to approximately 7.5 pounds and either will be flown at speeds of 2-25 miles per hour, and in 

visual line of sight of the operator. The EQUIPMENT does not carry pilots, passengers, 

explosive materials, or flammable liquid fuels. The EQUIPMENT will be operated within the 

parameters of the User Manuals.

SAI will also provide the FAA with advance notice of all operations via a NOTAM and 

coordination with the local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO). The proposed operations 

will be at least as safe as, or safer than, conventional rotorcraft operating with an airworthiness 

certificate without the restrictions and conditions proposed here. 

B. 14 C.F.R. Part 27 Airworthiness Standards: Normal Category Rotorcraft

14 C.F.R. Part 27 sets forth the procedural requirements for airworthiness certification of normal 

category rotorcraft. To the extent the EQUIPMENT would otherwise require certification under 

Part 27, SAI seeks an exemption from Part 27’s airworthiness standards for the same reasons 

identified in the request for exemption from 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H.

C. 14 C.F.R. §§ 45.23(b), 45.27(a) and 91.9(c): Aircraft Marking and 

Identification Requirements

14 C.F.R. §45.23(b), Markings of the Aircraft states:

When marks include only the Roman capital letter “N” and the registration number is displayed 

on limited, restricted or light-sport category aircraft or experimental or provisionally certificated 

aircraft, the operator must also display on that aircraft near each entrance to the cabin, cockpit, or 

pilot station, in letters not less than 2 inches nor more than 6 inches high, the words “limited,” 

“restricted,” “light-sport, “experimental,” or “provisional,” as applicable.

14 C.F.R. § 45.27(a) states:
Rotorcraft. Each operator of a rotorcraft must display on that rotorcraft horizontally on both 

surfaces of the cabin, fuselage, boom, or tail the marks required by § 45.23.

14 C.F.R. § 91.9(c) states:

No person may operate a U.S.-registered civil aircraft unless that aircraft is identified in 

accordance with part 45 of this chapter.

In a previous Grant of Exemption, the FAA determined that exemption from these requirements 

was warranted provided that the aircraft “have identification (N-Number) markings in 

accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C if the markings are “as large as 

practicable.” See Exemption No. 11062, Docket No. FAA 2014-0352, at p. 14.

Equivalent Level of Safety: SAI will mark all PHANTOMs and INSPIREs with their NNumber in a prominent spot on the fuselage with markings that are as large as practicable.

D. 14 C.F.R. § 61.113: Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations

SAI seeks exemption from 14 CFR § 61.113, which restricts private pilots from flying aircraft 

for compensation or hire and would also require a second class medical certificate. The purpose 

of Part 61 is to ensure that the skill and competency of any PIC matches the airspace in which 

the PIC will be operating, as well as requiring certifications if the pilot is carrying passengers or 

cargo for hire.

While the EQUIPMENT will be operated as part of a commercial operation, they carry neither 

passengers nor cargo. In the Grant of Exemption in FAA Docket No. FAA-2014-0352, the FAA 

determined that the unique characteristics of UAS operation outside of controlled airspace did 

not warrant the additional cost and restrictions attendant with requiring the PIC to have a 

commercial pilot certificate and a class II medical certificate. The FAA has also determined that 

the required knowledge for a commercial pilot covers the same fundamental principles as a 

private pilot.

The PIC will possess at least a sport pilot certificate, a third class medical certificate or valid 

state issued driver’s license, and will have completed a Basic Operator Course for the

EQUIPMENT.

The FAA stated in its grant of an exception to Astraeus Aerial the “the FAA considers the 

overriding safety factor for the limited operations proposed by the petitioner to be the airmanship 

skills acquired through UAS-specific flight cycles, flight time, and specific make and model 

experience, culminating in verification through testing.” See Exemption No. 11062, Docket No. 

FAA 2014-0352, at p. 18. The proposed operations can achieve an equivalent level of safety by 

requiring the knowledge and experience in the EQUIPMENT operations described above.

The restrictions SAI has placed on its EQUIPMENT operations meet or exceed the restrictions 

similarly imposed on Astraeus Aerial in FAA Docket No. FAA-2014-0352. SAI will operate in 

restricted areas (the sites) away from persons and property not involved in the operation. The 
aircraft will be flown based on VLOS at or below 400 feet AGL, so as to accommodate flight 

operations on specified sites. A NOTAM will be issued at least 24 hours before the flight is to 

occur, and the flight will be coordinated with the applicable FSDO.

E. 14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a): Civil Aircraft Airworthiness

SAI seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a), which requires that a civil aircraft be in 

airworthy condition to be operated. The FAA has stated that no exemption is required to the 

extent that the requirements of Part 21 are waived or found inapplicable. Accordingly, SAI

requests that the requirements for Section 91.7 be treated in accordance with FAR Part 21 

Subpart H. See Grant of Exemption No. 11062, p. 19.

F. 14 C.F.R. § 91.9(b)(2): Civil Aircraft Flight Manual in the Aircraft; 

14 C.F.R. §§ 91.203(a) and (b): Carrying Civil Aircraft Certification and 

Registration

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 91.9(b)(2):

(b)No person may operate a U.S.-registered civil aircraft -

...

(2)For which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is required by § 21.5 of this 

chapter, unless there is available in the aircraft a current approved Airplane or 

Rotorcraft Flight Manual, approved manual material, markings, and placards, or 

any combination thereof.

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 91.203(a) and (b):

(a)Except as provided in § 91.715, no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it has 

within it the following:

(1)An appropriate and current airworthiness certificate.

(b)No person may operate a civil aircraft unless the airworthiness certificate required by

paragraph (a) of this section or a special flight authorization issued under § 91.715 is 

displayed at the cabin or cockpit entrance so that it is legible to passengers or crew.

SAI does not request an exemption from this section but instead notifies the FAA that, in 

accordance with FAA Office of Chief Counsel’s Opinion dated August 8, 2014, the UAS flight 

manual, registration certificate and other documentation will be kept at the control station with 

the PIC during flight. The Chief Counsel’s Office has held that for all UAS operations, this 

alternate method constitutes full compliance with the regulations. See also Grant of Exemption 

No. 11062, pp. 19-20, and Grant of Exemption No. 8607.

G. 14 C.F.R. § 91.103: Preflight Action

SAI seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.103, which requires a PIC to become familiar with 

specific information before each flight, including information contained in the FAAapproved Flight Manual on board the aircraft. The aircraft will not have a Flight Manual on 

board. The PIC will take all actions including reviewing weather, flight battery requirements, 

landing and takeoff distances and aircraft performance data before initiation of flight. Under 
these circumstances, the FAA has stated that no exemption is required. See Grant of Exemption 

No. 11062, p. 20. An exemption is requested to the extent that an FAA-approved Flight Manual 

is required.

Equivalent Level of Safety: An equivalent level of safety will be provided by following the User 

Manuals. The PIC will take all required preflight actions - including performing all required 

checklists and reviewing weather, flight requirements, battery charge, landing and takeoff 

distance, aircraft performance data, and contingency landing areas - before initiation of flight. 

The User Manuals will be kept at the ground station; with the operator at all times.

H. 14 C.F.R. § 91.109(a): Flight Instruction

SAI seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.109(a), which provides that “[n]o person may

operate a civil aircraft (except a manned free balloon) that is being used for flight instruction 

unless that aircraft has fully functioning dual controls.” UASs and remotely piloted aircraft, by 

their design, do not have functional dual controls. Instead, flight control is accomplished through 

the use of the A2 Flight Control System/Ground Control Station (GCS) that communicates with 

the aircraft via radio communications.

Equivalent Level of Safety: When flight instruction is performed, no pilots will be on the aircraft 

and the GCS will be a safe distance from the aircraft and the public, causing no safety hazard. 

Given the size and speed of the EQUIPMENT, an equivalent level of safe training can still be 

performed without dual controls because no pilot or passengers are aboard the aircraft, and all 

persons will be a safe distance away in the event that the aircraft experiences any difficulties 

during flight instruction. These flights will comply with the provisions in the User Manuals. 

Accordingly, SAI proposed method of operation provides superior levels of safety.

I. 14 C.F.R. § 91.119(c): Minimum Safe Altitudes in Uncongested Areas

SAI requests an exemption from the minimum safe altitude requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 

91.119(c). Section 91.119(c) prescribes that an aircraft may not be operated closer than 500 feet 

to any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure. The FAA has already determined that relief from 

Section 91.119(c) is warranted for UAS operations in uncongested areas with similar flight 

restrictions as those imposed by SAI. See Grant of Exemption No. 11062, p. 20-21.

Equivalent Level of Safety: Compared to flight operations with rotorcraft weighing far more 

than the maximum weights proposed herein, and given the lack of flammable fuel, any risk 

associated with these operations is far less than those that presently exist with conventional 

aircraft. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight, and speed of the

EQUIPMENT, as well as the locations where it is operated. In order to avoid any risk to aircraft, 

flight operations will be restricted to 400 feet AGL or below. As set forth in the User Manuals 

and herein, the EQUIPMENT will be operated at sites, away from persons or structures not 

involved in the operation. All persons who are not involved with SAI operations will be required 

to be at least 50 feet from the flight operation perimeter. 
J. 14 C.F.R. § 91.121: Altimeter Settings

This petition seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.121, which requires a person operating an 

aircraft to maintain cruising altitude or flight level by reference to an altimeter that is set to the 

elevation of the departure airport. The EQUIPMENT use both barometric pressure sensors and 

GPS to determine altitude but do not have the ability to set in a current altimeter setting. An 

exemption is required to the extent that the EQUIPMENT do not have a barometric altimeter 

setting. The altitude of the aircraft is monitored by the PIC on the ground control station and by

the visual observer.

Equivalent Level of Safety: The FAA has stated that an equivalent level of safety can be 

achieved if the aircraft will be operated at or below 400 feet AGL and within visual line-of-sight 

in addition to GPS based altitude information relayed in real time to the operator. See Grant of 

Exemption No. 11062, p. 20-21. As the attached User Manuals indicate, the EQUIPMENT will 

be operated at or below 400 feet AGL and comply with the limitations in the Grant of Exemption 

No. 11062.

K. 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions

SAI requests an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a)’s fuel requirements for flight in VFR 

conditions. Section 91.151 states:

(a) No person may begin a flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless 

(considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the 

first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed –

(1) During the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or

(2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45 minutes.

Here, the technological limitations on the EQUIPMENT battery power means that no meaningful 

flight operations can be conducted while still maintaining a 30 minute reserve. The aircraft is 

battery powered with a maximum flight time of between 18-25 minutes. SAI proposes that the 

maximum flight time for each operational flight will be 18-25 minutes. The aircraft will be safely

landed with no less than the greater of (a) 20% battery life remaining or (b) three minutes of 

flight time remaining.

Equivalent Level of Safety: The FAA has stated that an equivalent level of safety is provided if 

the UAS flight is conducted under daytime VFR flight conditions using VLOS, and terminated 

with at least 25% reserve battery power still available. See Grant of Exemption No. 11062, p. 21-

22. The User Manuals providing an equivalent level of safety by safely landing with no less than 

the greater of (a) 20% battery life remaining or (b) three minutes of flight time remaining and 

otherwise complying with the flight restrictions above.
L. 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(l), 91.409(a)(2); 91.417(a) and 

(b): Maintenance Inspections

SAI seeks an exemption from the maintenance inspection requirements contained in 14 C.F.R. § 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(l), 91.409(a)(2); 91.417(a) and

(b). These regulations specify maintenance and inspection standards in reference to 14 C.F.R. 

Part 43. See, e.g., 14 C.F.R. § 91.405(a) (stating that each owner or operator of an aircraft 

“[s]hall have the aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between 

required inspections ... have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter”). An 

exemption from these regulations is needed because Part 43 and these sections only apply to 

aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, which the EQUIPMENT will not have.

Equivalent Level of Safety: An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because maintenance 

and inspections will be performed in accordance with the Manuals. This includes maintenance, 

overhaul, replacement, and inspection requirements for the aircraft and procedures to document 

and maintain maintenance records for the aircraft. This also includes preflight inspection 

procedures. See Exemption No. 11062, Docket No. FAA 2014- 0352, at p. 14-15.

As provided in the Manuals, flights will not be conducted unless a flight operations checklist is 

performed that includes all of the aircraft’s components. The Manuals also set requirements for 

maintenance log books and record keeping as well as routine and post-flight maintenance. The 

Manuals set requirements for both annual maintenance and preventative maintenance.

VI. PUBLIC INTEREST

Granting SAI petition for exemption furthers the public interest. National policy set by Congress 

favors early integration of UAS into the NAS in controlled, safe working environments as

proposed in this petition. By granting this petition, the FAA will fulfill Congress’s intent of 

allowing UAS to operate safely in the NAS before completion of the rulemaking required under 

Section 333 of the Reform Act. 

SAI will operate in a manner that will ensure the public’s safety and will set the example for 

others to emulate. It is well established that UAS provide an additional tool for the filmmaking 

industry, adding a greater degree of flexibility, which supplements the current capabilities 

offered by manned aircraft.

VII. PRIVACY

All flights will be conducted in accordance with any federal, state or local laws regarding 

privacy.

VIII. NATIONAL SECURITY 

Given the small size of the UAS involved and the restricted environment within which they will 

operate, our petition presents no national security issue. Furthermore, the security screening 
conducted by the Transportation Security Administration of certificated airmen satisfies the 

statutory requirement of Section 333 for operations to not pose a threat to national security.

IX. SUMMARY FOR FEDERAL REGISTER

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11, the following summary is provided for publication in the Federal 

Register, should it be determined that publication is needed:

SAI seeks an exemption from the following rules in order to provide aerial photography and 

videography, home and roof inspections, bridge inspections, power line inspections, agricultural 

inspections, and inspections for real estate and insurance assessment needs: 14 C.F.R Part 21, 

Subpart H; 14 C.F.R Part 27; 14 C.F.R § 45.23(b); 14 C.F.R. § 45.27(a); 14 C.F.R § 61.113; 14 

C.F.R § 91.7(a); 14 C.F.R § 91.9(b)(2); 14 C.F.R § 91.9(c); 14 C.F.R § 91.103; 14 C.F.R § 

91.109(a); 14 C.F.R § 91.119; 14 C.F.R § 91.121; 14 C.F.R § 91.151(a) & (b) 14 C.F.R § 91.203 

(a) & (b); 14 C.F.R § 91.405(a); 14 C.F.R § 91.407(a)(l); 14 C.F.R § 91.409(a)(2); 14 C.F.R § 

91.417 (a) & (b).

The exemption will enhance safety by reducing risk to the operator, the general public and 

property owners from the hazards associated with operating UAS through deliberate planning, 

risk mitigation, and flight operations.

X. CONCLUSION

Satisfaction of the criteria provided in Section 333 of the Reform Act - size, weight, speed, 

operating capabilities, proximity to airports and populated areas, operation within visual line of 

sight, and national security considerations - provides more than adequate justification for the 

grant of the requested exemptions to permit SAI to operate the EQUIPMENT.

Granting the requested exemption will benefit the public interest as a whole in many ways, 

including (1) significantly improving safety and reducing risk by alleviating human exposure to 

danger; (2) improving the quality of services SAI can provide to its customers; and (3) 

decreasing the risks of unmanned aircraft interfering with manned aircraft

Respectfully submitted,

 

By: /s/ David Samalin

 Owner/Operator

Skyvision Aerial Images, LLC