alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03311]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9039]


Notice of Proposal To Extend the Memorandum of Understanding 
Between the Government of United States of America and the Government 
of the Republic of Italy Concerning the Imposition of Import 
Restrictions on Categories of Archaeological Material Representing the 
Pre-Classical, Classical, and Imperial Roman Periods of Italy

    The Government of the Republic of Italy has informed the Government 
of the United States of America of its interest in an extension of the 
Memorandum of Understanding Between the Government of United States of 
America and the Government of the Republic of Italy Concerning the 
Imposition of Import Restrictions on Categories of Archaeological 
Material Representing the Pre-Classical, Classical, and Imperial Roman 
Periods of Italy (``MOU'').
    Pursuant to the authority vested in the Assistant Secretary of 
State for Educational and Cultural Affairs, and pursuant to the 
requirement under 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(1), an extension of this MOU is 
hereby proposed.
    Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(2), the views and recommendations of 
the Cultural Property Advisory Committee regarding this proposal will 
be requested.
    A copy of the MOU, the Designated List of restricted categories of 
material, and related information can be found at the following Web 
site: http://culturalheritage.state.gov.

    Dated: February 9, 2015.
Evan Ryan,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-03311 Filed 2-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### Liebelt, Respondent, vs. Hardware Mutual Casualty Company and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *John M. Whitmer*of Park Falls, and *Fisher, Cashin & Reinholdt*of Stevens Point.

For the respondent: /. *A. DeBardeleben*of Phillips.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

# Current Images

HomeHistoryNational Cryptologic MuseumExhibits & ArtifactsCryptologic MuseumCurrent Exhibits

Search

Search

                              - All Images 
                              - Design Elements 
                              - NSA Historical Photographs 
                              - Other 

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

----

Download Image: Full Size (0.56 MB)

Tags:National Cryptologic Museum, NCM

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                               XETEL CORPORATION
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                        IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA
                                  (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       Three Months Ended
                                                     ---------------------- 
                                                     June 28,     June  29,
                                                       1997         1996
                                                       ----         ----
<S>                                         <C>        <C>         <C>
Shares issued and outstanding               (1)        8,811        8,536
                                                                 
Common Stock Equivalents:                                        
     Stock options                          (2)          827          967
                                                      ------       ------
                                                                 
Weighted average shares outstanding                    9,638        9,503
                                                      ======       ======
                                                                 
Net income                                            $  455       $  846
                                                      ======       ======
                                                                 
Earnings per share                                    $  .05       $  .09
                                                      ======       ======
</TABLE>

(1) Shares issued and outstanding based on the weighted average method.

(2) Stock options based  on the treasury stock  method using average market 
    price.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

INFINITE LEGACY INVESTMENTS LIMITED,

a Hong Kong private limited company,

Appellant,

v.

CBIZ ACCOUNTING, TAX AND ADVISORY OF SOUTH FLORIDA, LLC, 

a Delaware limited liability company,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-1142

[May 27, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Jaime R. Goodman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2017-CA009539-XXXX-MB.

Robert Rossano of the Law Offices of Robert Rossano, P.A., Coral 

Gables, for appellant.

H. Steven Vogel and Alan J. Perlman of Dickinson Wright PLLC, Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN, JJ., and ROBINSON, MICHAEL A., Associate Judge, 

concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BOYKIN LODGING COMPANY AS OF DECEMBER 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,971
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,710
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         646,432
<DEPRECIATION>                                (61,557)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 606,103
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        294,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     273,730
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   606,103
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                86,182
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,027
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,625
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,408
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,122
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,122
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,122
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06
<FN>
<F1>REGISTRANT UTILIZES AND UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET THEREFORE CURRENT ASSETS AND
CURRENT LIABILITIES ARE NOT APPLICABLE.
</FN>


</TABLE>
# **EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

 

Inconnection with the December 31, 2004 Form 10-K of Cornell Companies, Inc. (the“Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, James E. Hyman, Chief Executive Officer and theChairman of the Board, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/  James E. Hyman                                                 |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | James E. Hyman, Chief  Executive  Officer and Chairman of the Board |
|   | March 16, 2005                                                      |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 of
Intelligent Systems Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; andb)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 15, 2006
    
    /s/ Bonnie L. HerronBonnie L. HerronChief Financial Officer
_______________________________________ __ 

### Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



## October 15, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



## 136469 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n 

## PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices



## v SC: 136469 COA: 271597 Wayne CC: 05-007927 TIMOTHY ROY NULL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 25, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s1008 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 15, 2008

Clerk
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

AUG 26 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANGELO DeHERRERA,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 96-2122

(D. Ct. No. CR-95-330-JC)

(D. N. Mex.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel

has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material

assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th

Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This appeal is from an order of the district court sentencing defendant

DeHerrera to a term of imprisonment of 135 months after a plea agreement in
2

which defendant pled guilty to Count V of a superseding indictment, which

charged him with accessory after the fact to a carjacking resulting in death. The

district court imposed the sentence within the applicable Sentencing Guideline

range and refused to depart downward after a request for a downward departure

by the United States.

Defendant DeHerrera appeals arguing that the district court should have

granted a downward departure based upon U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 arguing that the

district judge should have granted defendant the downward departure because of

his mitigating role in the underlying offense. The record makes clear that the

district judge knew that he had the power to grant a downward departure. 

Downward departures from applicable Sentencing Guideline ranges are left to the

sound discretion of the trial court. It is well settled law in this circuit that absent

a misunderstanding on the sentencing judge’s part, illegality, or an incorrect

application of the guidelines, we will not review the denial of a downward

departure. United States v. Garcia, 919 F.2d 1478, 1481 (10th Cir. 1990). We

DISMISS this appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT,

Deanell Reece Tacha

Circuit Judge
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 16.1


December 7, 1998

Securities and Exchange Commission
Mail Stop 9-5
450 5th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:  Prodigy Communications Corporation

Dear Sirs/Madam:

We have read the statements made under the heading "Experts" contained in
the Prospectus, which is part of Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement
Form S-1 of the Prodigy Communications Corporation and agree with such
statements except that we have no basis to agree or disagree with the statements
made in (a) the first and second paragraphs, (b) clause (ii) of the third 
sentence of the third paragraph, and (c) the second and third sentences of the
fourth paragraph.

Sincerely,


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
/eoL-71:7-7 

14R0 

REL 

Fliky vt7J-1- 

SE 1 JULY i0.1.- MESSAtiEFORa 

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 

ACTIONpitipparry 

INFO 

FROM: OSAF 

UN AU/WSS-P 

685 cEcnra/sArss 76 

Oct 20, 1967 

This message confirms the direction furnished Wk 

Major O'Clair following the pre-presentation review of 

graphics and supporting material by this office on 

October 19, 1967. 

The graphics and supporting material for that portio 

of the Man-In-Space presentation pertaining to MOL will 

be limited to two slides (one a conceptual view of MOL 

orbiting vehicle, the other an actual photograph of the 

MOL heat shield test vehicle) and supporting information 

furnished by this office. 

The graphics depicting the resources survey potentia 

of the NASA Apollo Applications program will be removed 

from the presentation. Any supporting discussion or 

PAGES 

TIME 

,j,„500 

TYPE MSG. 

PRECEDENCE 

oTG 

D 

A 

F 

T 

E 

LUP-57 zeq 

PITON E 

53433 

SECURITY CLAssiFicAktroN 

-leekeyR 

E 

1. 

E 

A 

S 

E 

R 

SIG TURE 

T YPEO (or stamped) NAME AN 0 TITLE 

John O. Tinius Lt Col USAF 

AR INTERVALS; 

vms AUTOMATICALLY DECLASSIFIED 

TYPED NAME AND TITLE 

Lt cal Yost 

DD s raglIs I --73 IMPLACe. COVriCi: ir i MARV et 

DOD DIR. 5200.10 OSP, Mit 411■1$4.401.. 
.....•••••11•115■. 

apirauthoe...wor 

INITIALS 

NRQ-APPROVE44•PQR'.•••••"-••••■1" 

RELEASE T JULY 2015 

jp:N1 P.,11.'sCSAGERIRM - CONTIN6m1ON SHEET 

F ROMs OSAF(SAFSS) • 

text will likewise be omitted. 

Major O'Clair was also advised of those subject 

areas which are not to be discussed in any presentation, seminar, or like activity at any level of 

classification. 

This direction is consistent with current 

Secretary of Defense information policy directives 

for the 14Th program, with guidelines for DOD participation in NASA earth sensing programs, and existing 

national policy. 

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 

SECRET 

76685 

DOWNGRADED AT 12 YEAR INiERVALS; 

NOT AUTOMATICALLY DECLASSIFIED 

PAGE 

NR 

2 

NR OF 

PAGES. 

2 

DOD DIR. 5300.10 

SYMBOL salerreMatscAtiOnT 

SAFSS 

[1 '47'55173-1 *.... 00Vit NNNNN POUNTINil OFFICE, 1•111•■1111047111 ' 
E 197 

RR RA 

Rz4:7r a.4807 - 2 551719 

LJUUUU 

R 1623592 OCT 67 

F S MAXAELL AF B ALA 

TO C 

L A S 6'64 CCT 67. 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

UXLASSIFIED 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

STAFF MESSAGE BRANCH 

INCOMING MESSAGE 

AFIN: 3097 (17 Oct 67) F/feb 

ACTION: SAFSS-1 (2) 

,45> 

FM) SAFSS. SUBJECTS PRE-PRESENTAT I OR REV ID (F GRAPH ICS AND 

SUBSTANT I VE POINTS 04 • ACE MANEUVERS, MAN IN SPACE, AND SPACE 

PROGRAMS AT HQ USAF . MAJOR FRANC I S R. 0 'CLA IR V/ ILL ATTEND REV IEW 

Ct4 16-.19 OCT u NA4CR 0 'CIA IR POSSESSES F INAL TOP SEC T CLEARANCE. 

J (MLA M ALSO HAS SPEC IAL ACCESS CLEARANCE TO 14 H. 'TAR', SPACE 

PROMO/ S 437AP, 461, 632A, 9220AN 949. 

FORM 

JAN 05 0-309C UNCLASSMED
98-1929.

#### State v. Schultz.

Hamilton App. No. C-970954. By *sua sponte*orders, this court consolidated Supreme Court case Nos. 98-1779, *State v. Conyers;*98-1929, *State v. Schultz;*and 98-2044, *State v. Snowder.*These cases have been set for oral argument on September 14, 1999, and pursuant to the court's orders of August 30, 1999, time for oral argument was extended to twenty minutes per side. Upon consideration of the joint motion to sever case No. 98-2044, *State v. Snowder,*from the remaining two cases,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to sever case No. 98-2044, *State v. Snowder,*from the remaining two cases be, and hereby is, granted, and that the court’s orders of August 30,1999, are vacated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that oral argument time for case No. 98-2044, *State v. Snoivder,*will be fifteen minutes per side and oral argument time for case Nos. 98-1779, *State v. Conyers,*and 98-1929, *State v. Schultz,*will be fifteen minutes per side.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             42,980
<SECURITIES>                                      997,759
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                1,040,739
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    342,268
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             825,489
<BONDS>                                         9,395,206
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           77,570
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,955,997)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      342,268
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   76,400
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     681,960
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                719,886
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,325,446)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,325,446)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,325,446)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.170)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.170)



</TABLE>