alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1444 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1444

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the rate of tax 
              regarding the taxation of distilled spirits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2015

Mr. Peters (for himself, Mr. Sullivan, and Mrs. Gillibrand) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                               on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the rate of tax 
              regarding the taxation of distilled spirits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Distillery Excise Tax Reform Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. REDUCED RATE OF TAX ON CERTAIN DISTILLED SPIRITS.

    (a) In General.--Section 5001 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d) and by 
inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection:
    ``(c) Reduced Rate.--
            ``(1) In general.--In the case of a distilled spirits 
        operation, the otherwise applicable tax rate under subsection 
        (a)(1) on the first 100,000 of proof gallons of distilled 
        spirits which are removed in the calendar year and which have 
        been distilled, processed, or bottled by such operation at a 
        qualified facility in the United States shall be $2.70 per 
        proof gallon.
            ``(2) Controlled groups.--In the case of a controlled 
        group, the 100,000 proof gallon quantity specified in paragraph 
        (1) shall be applied to the controlled group. For purposes of 
        the preceding sentence, the term `controlled group' shall have 
        the meaning given such term by subsection (a) of section 1563, 
        except that `more than 50 percent' shall be substituted for `at 
        least 80 percent' each place it appears in such subsection. 
        Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, principles 
        similar to the principles of the preceding two sentences shall 
        be applied to a group under common control where one or more of 
        the persons is not a corporation.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 7652(f)(2) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``section 5001(a)'' and 
inserting ``subsections (a)(1) and (c)(1) of section 5001''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to distilled spirits produced in calendar years beginning after 
December 31, 2015.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA FROM THE COMPANY'S
GENERAL LEDGER AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS FINANCIAL REPORT PACKAGE AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                             1,000
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                       Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                    13,484
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       591
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>               56,101
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                  303,524
<ALLOWANCE>                               (2,274)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           390,276
<DEPOSITS>                               317,019
<SHORT-TERM>                              14,001
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                       32,648
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                   5,870
<OTHER-SE>                                20,738
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           390,276
<INTEREST-LOAN>                           12,285
<INTEREST-INVEST>                          2,112
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             186
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                          14,583
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         6,488
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         7,258
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      7,325
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                275
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                           128
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            8,407
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              919
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   597
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                 597
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.12
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                              8.47
<LOANS-NON>                                  926
<LOANS-PAST>                                 107
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                            2,628
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           2,332
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                386
<RECOVERIES>                                  44
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          2,264
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                       2,264
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0399

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

WILLARD DEAN McCAULOU,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause was classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court on August 17, 2022. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable John W. Larson, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 30 2022

09/30/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0399
ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

May 29,2015 

Mr. Paul Gretch 

Director 

Office of International Aviation 

United States Department of Transportation 

Room W86-316 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC 

1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

12th Floor 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

1EL 202 659 6600 

FAX 202 659 6699 

www.eckertseamans.com 

Evelyn D. Sahr 

202 659 6622 

esahr@eckertsean1ans. com 

RE: Polling Results for Application of JetBlue Airways Corporation for 

Exemption Authority (US-Anguilla/Dominica/British Virgin Islands 

Codesharing with Seaborne Airlines), Docket DOT-OST-2015-0114 

Dear Mr. Gretch, 

Please be advised we have polled and received non-objections from each of the U.S. carriers on 

the attached service list for the above-referenced application of JetBlue Airways Corporation 

(JetBlue). JetBlue respectfully requests the Department take prompt action on its application so 

that marketing of its service can begin as soon as possible. 

Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions. 

Sincerely, 

Evelyn D. Sahr 

Drew M. Derco 

Counsel for JetBlue Airways Corporation 
Service List 

robert.wirick@aa.com American Airlines 

howard.kass@aa.com 

abigail.donovan@aa.com 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com Delta Air Lines 

chris.walker@delta.com 

g;mrn:phy@croweJl.com United Airlines 

sseiden@croweU.com 

dan._weiss@united.com 

steve.morrissey@united.com 

bob.kneisley@wnco.com Southwest Airlines 

leslie.abbott@wnco.com 

matwood@cozen.com Frontier Airlines 

SLachter@cozen.com 

dkirstein@yklaw.com Spirit Airlines 

jyoung@yklaw.com 

thomas.ting@suncountry.com Sun Country Airlines 

j ohn.fredericksen@suncountry .com 

jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com Amerijet International 

j canny@amer~jet.com 

cristinasa@state. gov 

john.s.duncan@faa.gov 

ro bert.finamore@dot. gov 

brett.kruger@dot. gov 

brian.hedberg@dot.gov 

darren.j affe@dot. gov 

reese.davidson@dot.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet and the statement of earnings of Carver Bancorp, Inc. for the period at
and ending March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       4,230,757
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     350,835,693
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 83,892,617
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     112,527,849
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       109,392,000
<LOANS>                                    197,917,673
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,245,746
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             423,613,503
<DEPOSITS>                                 266,471,487
<SHORT-TERM>                               119,335,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,057,304
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,765,990
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,144
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,960,578
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             423,613,503
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              7,343,822
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           14,395,022
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               607,903
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            22,846,747
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           8,355,168
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          12,482,911
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       10,363,836
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                1,689,508
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                           (927,096)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             11,801,957
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,014,746)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 (3,014,746)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,739,668)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.80)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.51
<LOANS-NON>                                  3,284,461
<LOANS-PAST>                                 3,121,470
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               412,500
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                412,500
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,205,496
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  699,198
<RECOVERIES>                                    49,940
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,245,746
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,245,746
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our report
and to all references to our Firm included in or made a part of this Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus.

                                                        /s/  Arthur Andersen LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
September 14, 1999
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed June 10, 2013.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-12-00599-CV

ROLAND VON KURNATOWSKI, ET AL., Appellants

V.

CITY OF COMMERCE, TEXAS, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 196th District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 76,781

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Moseley, Bridges, and Lang-Miers 

On its own motion, the Court REINSTATES this case. The Court has before it 

appellants’ May 24, 2013 motion to dismiss appeal. We GRANT the motion and DISMISS the 

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

PER CURIAM

120599F.P05
–2–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

ROLAND VON KURNATOWSKI, ET AL., 

Appellants

No. 05-12-00599-CV V.

CITY OF COMMERCE, TEXAS, ET AL., 

Appellees

On Appeal from the 196th District Court, 

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 76,781.

Opinion delivered per curiam. Justices 

Moseley, Bridges and Lang-Miers sitting for 

the Court.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellees CITY OF COMMERCE, TEXAS, ET AL. recover their 

costs of this appeal from appellants ROLAND VON KURNATOWSKI, ET AL., unless the 

parties’ agreement provides otherwise.

Judgment entered this 10th day of June, 2013. 

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
1

Hall-Jordan, Luke

From: Donaldson, David

Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 9:58 AM

To: Hall-Jordan, Luke; djones@omb.eop.gov

Cc: Arling, Jeremy

Subject: RE: Any updates?

Attachments: EO12866_CAA Part 82F 2060-AS51 NPRM FRN_20151002.docx

Hi Danielle, Attached is the final redline version of the rule. 

David 

202-343-9086 

Begin forwarded message: 

From: "Jones, Danielle" <Danielle_Y_Jones@omb.eop.gov> 

Date: October 13, 2015 at 9:32:37 AM EDT 

To: "Hall-Jordan, Luke" <Hall-Jordan.Luke@epa.gov> 

Subject: RE: Any updates?

Hello Luke,

We are ready to wrap up the review. Could you please send me the most recent version of the redline 

for final review?

Thanks,

Danielle

From: Hall-Jordan, Luke [mailto:Hall-Jordan.Luke@epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 8:54 AM 

To: Jones, Danielle <Danielle_Y_Jones@omb.eop.gov> 

Subject: Any updates? 

 

Hi Danielle, 

 

It looks like I may have missed a call from you yesterday evening. I know you’re on leave until next week, 

but please give me a call if you have a second today for an update. You can reach me at either of the 

numbers below or on my personal cell (202-510-0020). 

 

Thanks again and enjoy your time out of the office!

 

Best, 

Luke 

202-343-9591 (desk) 

202-230-7589 (mobile) 
2
TOP SECRET

RUFF

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. FRIEDMAN, ASD/MA

SUBJECT: Additional Information on Ka-6

Per your request of 15 January, a review has been made of the

problems involved in re-establishing a KR-6 satellite reconnaissance

capability - to be programmed primarily against Cuban targets - but

also considering bonus coverage of South China targets. Aside from

China target coverage data, this review largely confirms and substantiates information contained in a previous paper on this subject

dated 14 Janua.D.116043 -64).

In summary, re-establishing KH-6 will involve the following

items:

1. Current Status: Program is now operationally dormant,

however, some studies are being conducted under contract to determine

feasibility of camera program improvement efforts.

2.• Number Available: Five payloads now available - could be

readied for launching within 6 months by ATLAS/AGENA - cost of readying (rehabilitation plus program improvement) all five payloads for

launching would

could be programmed at coat

additional payloads - 12 months.

liars. Additional KS-6 launchings

Lead time for

RUFF Siklit VIA lag lianas MIL NM taut till _____TOP-SEGRE--
RUFF

3. Systems Capability: Swath width of 40 NM (at nominal altitude) with ground resolution averaging 5 ft at nadir. Program improvement studies, centering largely around improved thermal control,

indicate resolutions of about 4 ft may be realized.

Cuban Coverage: One KH-6 mission will completely cover

Cuba four times.

5. Other Area Coverage - China, for example: Dependent upon

launch angle selected, the KH-6 could be programmed to cover China

targets between 24° - 34° North and 24 -34° South latitude. Approximately 130 of the 468 priority targets in China could be covered by the

KH-6 launched at an inclination of 34°.

Attachment:

Map - China Targets

RUFF

air-TOP-SECRET--

CUM Pity 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                              5
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                              35,790
<SECURITIES>                                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       73,991
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         5,012
<INVENTORY>                                                         56,568
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   183,398
<PP&E>                                                             750,885
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      64,480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   1,831,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              139,395
<BONDS>                                                          1,033,223
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                           749,149
<OTHER-SE>                                                         (95,287)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     1,831,813
<SALES>                                                            713,668
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                   713,668
<CGS>                                                              212,544
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      630,743
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     8,254
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 118,385
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                    (43,714)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       (12,793)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                (30,921)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    (24,728)
<CHANGES>                                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                                       (55,649)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                            0

</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

HomeAcademicsK12 PartnershipK-12 Outreach One-Time Event Request Form

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 23.1


                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-10747) pertaining to the 1996 Key Employee Stock Plan and the
1996 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan of Dailey Petroleum Services Corp. of our
report dated June 27, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Dailey Petroleum Services Corp. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended April 30, 1997.


                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Houston, Texas
July 29, 1997
99-611.

#### State ex rel. Childs v. Wingard.

In Habeas Corpus. Reported at 85 Ohio St.3d 1475, 709 N.E.2d 848. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. ,
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 98-6995 EDWARD JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-95-184-A, CA-98-99-AM) Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 7, 1998 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________ Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Edward Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn Cameron Alexander,OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION PER CURIAM: Edward Johnson appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) as time-barred and a subsequent order denying his motion to alter or amend the district court's first order. Because we find that Johnson's § 2255 motion was timely filed, we v acate and remand. Johnson's conviction was affirmed on direct appeal by this Court on September 10, 1996. The United States Supreme Court denied his petition for a writ of certiorari on January 13, 1997. Johnson, an incarcerated inmate, mailed his § 2255 motion on January 9, 1998. Because J ohnson filed his § 2255 motion within a year after his petition for a writ of certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court, we conclude that the district court erred in dismissing Johnson's motion as untimely filed. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255; Williams v. Dixon , 961 F.2d 448, 453 n.2 (4th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, we grant a certificate of appealability as to the district court's timeliness determination, vacate the district court's order denying his § 2255 motion, and remand for further proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. VACATED AND REMANDED 2