alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### The Honorable Beverly R. Stites, United States Magistrat e 1 

### Judge fo r the Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case wa s referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). ___________ No. 96-1353

___________ Michael G. Branch, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States Gary Grimes, Sheriff, Sebastian * District Court for the County Detention Center; * Western District of Arkansas Alan Marx, Night Shift * Supervisor and Jailer, * {UNPUBLISHED} Sebastian County Detention * Center, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: November 8, 1996 Filed: November 15, 1996

___________ Before McMILLIAN, WOLLMAN and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Michael G . Branch appeals from a final judgment of the Distric t Court for the Western District of Arkansas granting defendants judgmen t

1 followinga trial in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have carefull y reviewed the record, including the trial transcript, and we affirm on the basis of the district court's opinion. See8th Cir. R. 47B.

### -2- A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
ANNUAL REPORT
Chevy Chase Home Loan Trust 1996-1
$ 153,521,000 7.15% Asset Backed Certificates
For the Year Ended December 31, 1998




         PRINCIPAL    INTEREST      NET       NET        30 +      DELQ.
            DIST        DIST       LOSSES    LOSS %     DELQ.        %
        ____________ ___________ ___________ ________ ____________ _______
 Jan-98           0     837,623   1,534,117   13.59%    9,184,152    6.78%
 Feb-98  12,394,657     837,623     875,380    7.99%    8,466,829    6.44%
 Mar-98           0     763,772     441,078    4.16%    9,525,082    7.49%
 Apr-98           0     763,772     362,626    3.43%    9,677,424    7.63%
 May-98  13,703,050     763,772     333,538    3.29%    8,533,136    7.02%
 Jun-98           0     682,124     425,745    4.33%    8,021,835    6.79%
 Jul-98           0     682,124     423,743    4.47%    7,089,608    6.23%
 Aug-98  10,928,178     682,124     317,731    3.47%    7,057,718    6.43%
 Sep-98           0     617,011     259,010    2.92%    7,357,789    6.91%
 Oct-98           0     617,011     228,571    2.67%    7,385,865    7.19%
 Nov-98   9,119,316     617,011     398,528    4.79%    6,918,068    6.93%
 Dec-98           0     562,675     329,626    4.10%    6,821,147    7.07%
        ____________ ___________ ___________
 Totals  46,145,201   8,426,643   5,929,692

  **  The date represents the month of the Distribution date, the
      information is from activity of the previous month.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 36 (Tuesday, February 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 9738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03640]



[[Page 9738]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDCD.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the NATIONAL 
INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, including 
consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the 
competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDCD.
    Date: March 17, 2015.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 31, Room 3C02, 31 
Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Andrew J. Griffith, Ph.D., MD, Director, 
Division of Intramural Research, National Institute on Deafness and 
Other Communication Disorders, 35A Convent Drive, GF 103, Rockville, 
MD 20892, 301-496-1960, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e285908b84848b9683a28c8b868186cc8c8b8acc858d94"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8aedf8e3ecece3feebcae4e3eee9eea4e4e3e2a4ede5fc">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/about/groups/bsc/, where an agenda and 
any additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 18, 2015.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-03640 Filed 2-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
*March 5, 1929.*

#### Scheuber, Respondent, vs. Schultz and wife, imp., Appellants.

For the appellants: *W. 0. Meilahn,*attorney, and *C. R. Dineen,*of counsel, both of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Clarence W. Dodson*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Order affirmed.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Kivean Deshai Coffey, Appellant

No. 06

- 13

- 00219

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 276th District Court of Morris County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 10,774CR ). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Carter and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial cour t

. We note that the appellant, Kivean Deshai Coffey, has adequately indicated his inability

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JU NE 13, 2014
BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Benton, Humphreys and Senior Judge Overton

BAYSHORE ROOFING, INC. AND COMMONWEALTH CONTRACTORS GROUP SELF-INSURANC E ASSOCIATION MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 1539-05-1 PER CURIAM OCTOBER 11, 2005 RICHARD D. BELCHER

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (William C. Walker; Audrey Marc ello; Taylor & Walker, P.C., on brief), for appellants. (Judd B. Mendelson; Steingold & Mendelson, on brief), for appellee.

Bayshore Roofing, Inc. and its insurer appe al a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission ruling that Richard D. Belcher proved he sustained an injury by accident arising out of his employment on September 29, 2003. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordi ngly, we affirm the commission’s decision for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Belcher v. Bayshore Roofing, Inc. et.al. , VWC File No. 215-94-99 (June 13, 2005). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and lega l contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument woul d not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

NEIL D. HARKNESS

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 23

- 572

LT Case No. 2021

- CF

- 1229

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. ________________________________/

Decision filed July 11, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Du val County

, R. Anthony Salem , Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Teresa D. Sutton, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and

Heather Flan a gan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS

, EISNAUGLE and KILBANE , JJ., conc ur.
**Exhibit 10.3**

 

**AMENDMENTNUMBER FOUR**

**to**

**AMENDED AND RESTATED 2004 STOCK OPTION PLAN**

**of**

**SUPREME INDUSTRIES, INC.**

 

TheAmended and Restated 2004 Stock Option Plan (the “*Plan*”)of Supreme Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “*Company*”), was adopted by the Company’s Board of Directorseffective as of February 7, 2006. The Plan has been amended by Amendment Number One thereto dated October 25,2006, Amendment Number Two thereto dated March 28, 2007, and AmendmentNumber Three thereto dated March 25, 2008.

 

Article 9of the Plan provides that the Board of Directors may, at any time, without theconsent of the Participants under the Plan, amend the Plan.

 

Afterreviewing the situation, the Board of Directors has determined that theAmendment below can be made by the Board of Directors in accordance with such Article 9and without the need for shareholder approval of such amendment.

 

Accordingly,the Board of Directors hereby amends the Plan by deleting Section 2.15 (“FairMarket Value”) and replacing it with the following:

 

“**2.15      “*Fair Market Value*”** means as of a relevant date,if the Common Stock is traded on one or more established markets or exchanges,the closing price of the Common Stock on the primary market or exchange onwhich the Common Stock is traded on the business day immediately preceding therelevant date, and if the Common Stock is not so traded or the Common Stockdoes not trade on the business day immediately preceding the relevant date, thevalue determined in good faith by the Board of Directors using a reasonablevaluation method in accordance with the provisions of Section 409A of theCode or Section 422 of the Code, as applicable.  For purposes of valuing Incentive StockOptions, the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock shall be determined withoutregard to any restriction other than one which, by its terms, will never lapse.”

 

DATEDto be effective August 25, 2009.

 
|   | BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF     |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | SUPREME INDUSTRIES,  INC. |
|   |                      |
|   |                      |
|   | By:                       | /s/  Herbert M. Gardner |
|   |                      | Herbert  M. Gardner, Chairman of the Board |

 

----
NRO Key To Acquisition of Hazard Support System

29 June 1998

The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) led the acquisition of the Hazard Support System, 

which will be used to warn of the outbreak of wildfires and volcanic eruptions. It is a joint 

program between the Department of Defense, United States Geological Survey (USGS), the 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and other government agencies. 

The NRO was asked to take the lead in the system because of its expertise in the acquisition, 

integration and development of satellite-related systems. The Hazard Support System will use 

ballistic missile warning satellites, civil weather and environmental satellites and other sensors to 

continuously monitor the United States and its territories to detect wild land fires and the entire 

globe for volcanic activity. It can also track the movement of volcanic ash clouds which impact 

aviation.

The program is the collaborative effort of more than a dozen government agencies and its 

prototype should be ready to test this summer. Full operations would start in 1999. It could save 

the United States millions of dollars annually in fire losses and fire-suppression costs, can reduce 

the number of lives endangered, and can provide early warning to avert a potential volcanic 

catastrophe. 

The Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Space spearheaded an interagency 

effort to field the prototype system, which will be operated by the USGS. The initial prototype of 

the system cost $23.6 million and is being developed over two years. The development contract 

was won by a Raytheon-led team that includes the Harris Corporation and Ball Aerospace. 

The Hazard Support System center will be in Reston, VA., at the USGS. The center will receive 

information from the various satellite systems which will be fused and correlated in real-time 

with other data, such as nationwide lightening-strike events, Doppler weather radar, fire potential 

indicators and wind data. Detections of fires, volcanic eruptions and ash clouds will be reported 

electronically to the federal agencies responsible for warning of these disasters.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1348 

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 

with respect to high priority corridors on the National Highway System, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 14, 2015 

Mr. TILLIS (for himself, Mr. BURR, Mr. KAINE, and Mr. WARNER) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency 

Act of 1991 with respect to high priority corridors on 

the National Highway System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Route to Opportunity 

5 And Development Act of 2015’’ or the ‘‘ROAD Act of 

6 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1348 IS

1 SEC. 2. HIGH PRIORITY CORRIDORS ON NATIONAL HIGH2 WAY SYSTEM. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1105(c) of the Intermodal 

4 Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 

5 2032) is amended by striking paragraph (13) and insert6 ing the following: 

7 ‘‘(13) Raleigh-Norfolk Corridor from Raleigh, 

8 North Carolina, through Rocky Mount, Williamston, 

9 and Elizabeth City, North Carolina, to Norfolk, Vir10 ginia.’’. 

11 (b) INCLUSION OF CERTAIN ROUTE SEGMENTS ON

12 INTERSTATE SYSTEM.—Section 1105(e)(5)(A) of the 

13 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 

14 (109 Stat. 597; 118 Stat. 293) is amended by inserting 

15 ‘‘subsection (c)(13),’’ after ‘‘subsection (c)(9),’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23



           Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

     We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration
Statement of River Valley  Bancorp on Form S-8,  File Number  333-58190,  of our
report,  dated  January 21, 2005,  on our audits of the  consolidated  financial
statements of River Valley Bancorp as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for each
of the years in the three-year  period ended December 31, 2004,  which report is
incorporated by reference in River Valley Bancorp's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.


/s/ BKD, LLP

BKD, LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
March 29, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Financial Statements of Boykin Lodging Company as of December 31,
1996, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-04-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      21,362,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  306,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                     114,661,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,339,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             137,271,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 117,021,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               137,271,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,378,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,414,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             123,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                801,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            801,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (4,908,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,107,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($0.46)
<FN>
<F1>Registrant utilizes an unclassified Balance Sheet therefore
total current assets and total current liabilities are not applicable.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Petty, AtLee and Senior Judge Clements 

JAMES STONE 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* 

v. Record No. 1048-15-4 PER CURIAM 

 OCTOBER 20, 2015 

SKYLINE AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND 

 ACCIDENT FUND NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (David B. Vermont; Ashcraft & Gerel, LLP, on brief), for appellant. 

 (Brandi R. Howell; Franklin & Prokopik, P.C., on brief), for 

appellees. 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 

 James Stone appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that 

(a) his claim was not timely and thus barred by the statute of limitations, and (b) his neck 

condition was not related to the original compensable accident because the medical records 

showed he complained of neck pain, the treating orthopedist testified the neck injury was masked 

by the shoulder injuries, and the treating neck specialist opined the neck injury was related to the 

original claim. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this 

appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its 

final opinion. See Stone v. Skyline Auto., Inc., VWC File No. VA00000262486 (June 2, 2015). 

We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

 Affirmed. 

UNPUBLISHED
---

---

# Exhibit 13

# CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Check
Point Software Technologies Ltd., an Israeli corporation (the Company), does
hereby certify, to the best of such officers knowledge, information and belief, that
the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Form
20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 20-F
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|Date: March 14, 2007 |  | By: /s/ Gil Shwed
Gil ShwedChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | By: /s/ Eyal Desheh
Eyal DeshehExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1214 

To prevent human health threats posed by the consumption of equines raised 

in the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 6, 2015 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Mr. GRAHAM, Ms. COLLINS, and Ms. MIKULSKI) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To prevent human health threats posed by the consumption 

of equines raised in the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘John Rainey Memorial 

5 Safeguard American Food Exports (SAFE) Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds that— 

8 (1) unlike cows, pigs, and other domesticated 

9 species, horses and other members of the equidae 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1214 IS

1 family are not raised for the purpose of human con2 sumption; 

3 (2) equines raised in the United States are fre4 quently treated with substances that are not ap5 proved for use in horses intended for human con6 sumption and equine parts are therefore unsafe 

7 within the meaning of section 409 of the Federal 

8 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; 

9 (3) equines raised in the United States are fre10 quently treated with drugs, including phenylbuta11 zone, acepromazine, boldenone undecylenate, omep12 razole, ketoprofen, xylazine, hyaluronic acid, nitrofu13 razone, polysulfated glycosaminoglycan, clenbuterol, 

14 tolazoline, and ponazuril, which are not approved for 

15 use in horses intended for human consumption and 

16 equine parts are therefore unsafe within the mean17 ing of section 512 of the Federal Food, Drug, and 

18 Cosmetic Act; and 

19 (4) consuming parts of an equine raised in the 

20 United States likely poses a serious threat to human 

21 health and the public should be protected from these 

22 unsafe products. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1214 IS

1 SEC. 3. PROHIBITIONS. 

2 Section 301 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

3 Act (21 U.S.C. 331) is amended by adding at the end the 

4 following: 

5 ‘‘(ddd) Notwithstanding any other provision of this 

6 section— 

7 ‘‘(1) equine parts shall be deemed unsafe under 

8 section 409 of this Act; 

9 ‘‘(2) equine parts shall be deemed unsafe under 

10 section 512 of this Act; and 

11 ‘‘(3) the knowing sale or transport of equines or 

12 equine parts in interstate or foreign commerce for 

13 purposes of human consumption is hereby prohib14 ited.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
23.1
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (No. 333-15805, 333-45026, 333-62020, 333-106569 and 333-106570) of Aware,
Inc. of our reportdated
February 15, 2008 relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial
statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.
 
 /s/PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
 
 PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
 Boston,
Massachusetts
 February
15, 2008