alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION
OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report (the
"Report") of Digerati Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2012,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Arthur L. Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that,



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





By	           /s/ Arthur L. Smith

Arthur L. Smith

President and

Chief Executive Officer

November 13, 2012
Mr. Eugene Root “4 December 2, 1957.

of these hearings. We should, therefore, appreciate it very

much if you would give this your Prompt consideration and
attention,

Sincerely,

Edwin L. Weisel, Special Counsel
Senate Preparedness Investigating
Subcommittee _

Mr. Eugene Root, Division Manager . i
Lockheed Aircraft Corporation | !
Palo Alto, California



‘principal purpose of the inquiry J
tatus of those Programs, the. . a.
ms have not Proceeded at a faster @ iad ;

.taken to accelerate such Pro- :

" P 2 to,
rather to’get ‘an overall
v4, future missile situation,

2 ving
tion in the missile prog:
answered Separately with r
which your Company is
invi : o,



Mr. Eugene Root a December 2, '1987-

I. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

NE DEVELOPMENT :
"A. With respect to each miseile on which you are works
ing, when did Start research and development

work? .

B. What is the present status of research and develop- 34
ment with respect to each missile on which you a !

C. Has there been any Limitation imposed at aay time .
on your use of overtime? If so, has there been any
change with respect thereto? . .

D. Have you been hampered directly or indirectly in
your research and development work by lack of
funds? If so, please explain,

E. Have you at any time been hampered in your
research and development work by lack of sufficient ~
manpower? If so, Please explain, :

F. Has your research and development work been
delayed by change orders? if 80, please explain,

G. What other principal bottlenecks, if any, have you. 4
"encountered in your research and development wor!
on each missile?

H. PRODUCTION

‘A. With respect to the production of each missile,
specify when a letter of intent was issued,
Contract was executed and when production was
started, . 7



“st

«,, The next set of hearings for the presentation of testimony and.
“f" data to the Subcommittee has been fixed for Friday, December...

13, 1957, We should like very much to have the requested infor:

mation ready for presentation to the Subcommittee at the opening ~

Please furnish the original production schedule on i.
each missile. Indicate what changes, if any, have

+ been made in such schedule. Indicate what production |

has been obtained to date.

C. What have been the principal factors limiting of
deterring production of each missile? :

D. Has there been any limitation imposed at any time
om your use of overtime? If so, hae there been any
change with respect thereto? |

E. Has production been hampered directly or indirectly °

by lack of funds? If so, please explain,

F. Have you at any time been hampered in production
by lack of sufficient manpower? If so, please
explain. .

G. Has production been delayed by change orders? If
so, please explain, :

I. RECOMMENDATIONS ” :

Please outline your recommendatione for accelerating
the development and production of the missiles which
you are developing er producing.

earliest possible date consonant with a thorough investigation.
It is the hope of the Subcommittee that it will be able to make its
Conclusions and recommendations to the Senate shortly after
Congress reconvenes. . : .
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2010-1158 SNPRM

Directorate ID: 2010-NM-125-AD

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:

If NO, we don’t agree because 
Page 2 of 3

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Date

Branch Manager Date
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

HomeHistoryCryptologic HistoryHistorical FiguresHistorical Figures View

# NSA Historical Figures
NRO APPRQVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

Co 

HANDLE VIA B yEMA T 

CONTROL SYST 

13 July 1965 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 

SUBJECT: Department of Defense Manned Orbiting Laboratory 

Program - A Consideration of International 

Political Factors 

The Department of Defense MOL Program complicates 

the U. S. satellite reconnaissance program because it 

 renews the concept of a man (in this case a military 

 man) engaged in reconnaissance activity over denied 

 areas. Since the space vehicle will be larger than 

 those currently used in unmanned operations - and 

since military man is, after all, a soldier, it is 

 natural that high-level U. S. government consideration 

 be given to the question as to whether or not continued 

 secrecy with respect to such activities might not 

 provoke concern on the part of foreign governments that 

 the U. S. may be embarking upon a system of orbital 

 weapondry (i.e., atomic bombs or death rays). On the 

 surface it would appear that an admission to the observa- 

 tion mission would create a far less problem to the 

 national image. It must be additionally recognized, 

however, that an admission to a mission of reconnaissance 

from MOL would render pointless any practice where 

 such admission with respect to unmanned satellite missions 

 is scrupulously avoided. 

Since the advent of the cold war, there have been 

 two basic disturbing issues in East-West negotiations. One 

 has been the existance of a super weapon capable of destroying 

 all humanity; the second has been the Iron Curtain, or 

 the Soviet fetish for secrecy. The first problem has been 

 temporarily neutralized because both sides possess the 

 weapon in such volume as to cause its usage to be a 

 catastrophy to both. Soviet secrecy on the other hand, has 

 provided them with a poker player's advantage in any instance 

clJ 

where threat of possible use of force entered into negotiations. 

 Satellite reconnaissance ha4quch to detract from this 

advantage enjoyed by the Soviets. If the 

vomallogollglir 

C- I ___ C)pies 

; __J_Gf __ __ 

Control No. -444ttetwebi4 _C4.74Z4r. 
F. 

Chi f Sec 

NRO Staff. 

A 

ty Officer 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 NLY 

photographic resolution design criteria of MOL are 

achieved, it will have a major impact upon the effect 

of existing Soviet secrecy techniques and for all 

practical purposes render them useless. 

The anticipated photographic resolution 

of MOL therefore is the most sensitive aspect of the 

program. The Soviets will, in all probability, go to 

great lengths to preserve the advantage resulting from 

their policy of secrecy. If they do not, it will negate 

their ability to bluff - and, since going beyond a bluff 

.4siglimight mean a catastrophy which would bring about their 

own destruction, a stalemate would result under which they 

can only lose - not gain - in international influence. 

I suggest that the time is not yet appropriate for 

the IT, S. to admit to its satellite reconnaissance 

activities.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 35 (Monday, February 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 9481]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03723]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Parole Commission


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 12:00 p.m., Tuesday, February 24, 2015.

PLACE: U.S. Parole Commission, 90 K Street NE., 3rd Floor, Washington, 
DC.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Determination on five original jurisdiction 
cases.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jacqueline Graham, Staff Assistant 
to the Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission, 90 K Street NE., 3rd Floor, 
Washington, DC 20530, (202) 346-7001.

    Dated: February 18, 2015.
J. Patricia W. Smoot,
Acting Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-03723 Filed 2-19-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT 

_____________________

No. 18-60302

_____________________

CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, 

Plaintiff - Appellee 

v. 

ALL AMERICAN CHECK CASHING, INCORPORATED; MID-STATE 

FINANCE, INCORPORATED; MICHAEL E. GRAY, Individually, 

Defendants - Appellants

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

__________________________

(Opinion March 3, 2020, 5 Cir., 2020, 2020 WL 1026927)

Before OWEN, Chief Judge, JONES, SMITH, STEWART, DENNIS, ELROD, 

SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES, HIGGINSON, COSTA, WILLETT, 

DUNCAN, ENGELHARDT, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.1

BY THE COURT:

A majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not

disqualified having voted in favor, on the Court’s own motion, to rehear this

case en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc

with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 

41.3, the panel opinion in this case dated March 3, 2020, is vacated.

1 Judge Ho is recused and did not participate in this decision.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 20, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 4.20

To Peer M. Schatz

Dear Peer M. Schatz:

In addition to your contract as a managing director with the Company dated May
1, 1993, we hereby agree as follows:

    1.  In the event of a "change of control" you will receive compensation. A
        "change of control" is defined as

           -   As used herein, a "Change in Control" shall be deemed to have
               occurred if (i) there is a sale or transfer of all or
               substantially all of the assets of the Company in one or a series
               of transactions; or (ii) there is a merger or consolidation of
               the Company whether or not approved by the Board of Directors,
               other than a merger or consolidation which would result in the
               voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior
               thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding
               or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving
               entity or the parent of such corporation) more than 50% of the
               total voting power represented by the voting securities of the
               Company or such surviving entity or parent of such corporation
               outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation.

    2.  The compensation is calculated as follows:
               ((13 x the then current monthly salary)+bonus) x 5 = compensation

           -   the monthly salary is the agreed gross salary as per the
               employment contract in the month in which the change of control
               occurs
           -   the bonus is the gross bonus and other variable cash components
               that were agreed for the year in which the change of control
               occurs
           -   Other compensation components (e.g. company car) are not
               considered for the calculation of the compensation
           -   The treatment of granted stock options is agreed on in a separate
               document.

    3.  The compensation is a gross sum which is subject to tax and other
        standard deductions

    4.  The compensation is to be paid within 3 months after the change of
        control

    5.  This agreement is valid for all changes of control pursuant to article 1
        of this agreement and which occurs on or before Oct. 10, 2007.

    QIAGEN GmbH

    (Represented by the sole shareholder, QIAGEN NV)
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JESUS RIVERA-ALVARADO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-10539

D.C. No. 2:09-cr-01114-GMS-5

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 19, 2012

San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Defendant Jesus Rivera-Alvarado appeals his sentence following his

convictions for conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute

methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846; distribution and possession

with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841;

possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug-trafficking crime, in violation of

FILED

APR 24 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

18 U.S.C. § 924(c); and being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18

U.S.C. §§ 922(g), 924(a). We affirm. 

The district court did not err in admitting the jury verdict during the hearing

under 21 U.S.C. § 851. We assume, without deciding, that the Federal Rules of

Evidence apply to a hearing under 21 U.S.C. § 851. Federal Rule of Evidence

201(b)(2) permits a court to take judicial notice of a fact that "can be accurately

and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be

questioned." Those requirements plainly were met here. Judicial notice of the

verdict, as was requested by the government, was therefore proper.

AFFIRMED.
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE         

No 40/2006

of 10 March 2006         

amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following sub-indent shall be added in the seventh indent (Council Decision 2000/819/EC) of Article 7(5) of Protocol 31 to the Agreement:

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification to the EEA Joint Committee under Article 103(1) of the Agreement (*1).

It shall apply from 1 January 2006.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 March 2006.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

R. WRIGHT            

----

(1)OJ L 239, 15.9.2005, p. 67.

(2)OJ L 289, 3.11.2005, p. 14.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

HomeHistoryCryptologic HistoryHistorical FiguresHistorical Figures View

# NSA Historical Figures

                Download            

# Joseph E. Gilligan, Jr. 

##                 2021 Hall of Honor Inductee            

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

2021
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of SK Telecom Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: April 29, 2016 |  | /s/ Dong Hyun Jang                   
|                      |  | Dong Hyun Jang                       
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.