alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Wells Coal & Dock Company and another, Appellants, vs. Industrial Commission and others, Respondents.

*March 12*

April *7, 1937.*

*547For the appellants there was a brief by *Quarles, Spence & Quarles,*attorneys, and *Kenneth Grubb*and *Arthur Larson*of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Grubb.*

For the respondent Industrial Commission there was a brief by the *Attorney General*and *Mortimer*Levitan, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by *Mr. Levitan.*

Rosenberry, C. J.

The question for decision is whether under the facts of this case the plaintiffs are liable under the provisions of sec. 102.06, Stats., for compensation. That section provides:

> “An employer shall be liable for compensation to an employee of a contractor or subcontractor under him who is not *548subject to this chapter, or who has not complied with the conditions of subsection (2) of- section 102.28 in any case where such employer would have been liable for compensation if such employee had been working directly for him. ...”

Was Ferdinand Miller a contractor of the Dock Company within the meaning of this section? It is considered that this case is ruled by *Madison Entertainment Corp. v. Industrial Comm.*(1933) 211 Wis. 459, 248 N. W. 415, in favor of the plaintiffs. As was there pointed out, a contractor within the meaning of this section is one who undertakes to do some part of the work ordinarily done by the principal by whom he is employed. Boilermaking and boiler repairing was no part of the Dock Company’s business. Ferdinand Miller was no more a contractor within the meaning of this section than he would have been if the boiler had been loaded on a truck, taken to his shop and there repaired. He was no more a contractor than an automobile mechanic who repairs a car which is brought to his shop and in the course of the operation uses his helpers. The repair of boilers was something entirely distinct and apart from the business of the Dock Company. While it is true the relationship between the Dock Company and Ferdinand Miller was contractual in the sense that he was entitled to a reasonable compensation for his services, and could maintain an action upon an express or implied contract according to the circumstances of the case to recover therefor, he was not a contractor within the meaning of that term as used in sec. 102.06, Stats., for the reason stated in the *Madison Entertainment Corp. Case.*It is clear as pointed out in that case that the term “contractor” was not used in a broad and all-inclusive sense in sec. 102.06. So construed, the statute would lead to absurd and inconsistent results.

*By the Court.*— Judgment appealed from is reversed, and cause remanded with directions to the lower court to enter judgment setting aside the award.
Development of Chemical Precipitation Purchased Equipment Costs

– Mixer

This pdf file supports EPA’s derivation of purchased equipment cost equations for mixers using

information provided during plant site visits and in response to the Steam Electric Survey.

The following calculations sheet and supporting information document EPA’s development of a filtrate

sump sizing factor (highlighted yellow) that is used to calculate the filtrate sump mixer cost.

## CALCULATION SHEET

SIGNATURE_ _________DATE 2 /8 /2013 CHECKED DATE 2 /8 /2013

PROJECT_____Steam Electric Effluent Guidelines_______________ __________________________________________

SUBJECT_____Design Basis for Chemical Precipitation Filtrate Sump_____ _________________________________________



### Airport

The design of the 1-stage chemical precipitation treatme nt system for FGD wastewater includes a concrete

basin to act as a filtrate sump receiving filtrate from the filter presses and other miscellaneous floor drain

wastewater from the wastewater treatment plant. This calculation sheet provides the design basis used for the

filtrate sump.

From Keystone Station (Plant ID 3831):

Filtrate Sump Capacity = 33,000 gallons

FGD Wastewater Flow GPD = 120,000 gpd (FGD1) + 120,000 gpd (FGD2) = 240,000 gpd

From Steam Electric Costs and Loads Model:

Capacity Factor = 1.47

Calculate Keystone FGD wastewater flow in gph:

FGD Wastewater Flow GPH = 240,000 gpd / 24 hpd = 10,000 gph

Calculate Filtrate Sump Design Basis in minutes:

Sump Design Basis = 33,000 gallons / (10,000 gph * 1.47) = 2.2 hours * 60 min/hr = 132 minutes
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 (the "Report"), I,
Michael J. McCann, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



Petroleum Helicopters, Inc.



By: /s/ Michael J. McCann
    -------------------------------
    Michael J. McCann
    Chief Financial Officer
    August 14, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          22,857
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  416,408
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               306,827
<PP&E>                                         697,608
<DEPRECIATION>                                  96,047
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,572,478
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,258,302
<BONDS>                                        149,968
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,968,715
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,804,507)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,572,478
<SALES>                                      1,911,484
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,911,484
<CGS>                                        1,830,963
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,830,963
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,132
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,685
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,704
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,704
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,704
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.000)
        

</TABLE>
;n •;r474).C.4

14;

-12

T.:11.3157T7 7f ;',7 S J . ..1•171,7•11ew, ,,

14'

4:e
**EXHIBIT****32.2**

MICROS SYSTEMS, INC.

Certification of Principal Financial Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Gary C. Kaufman, Executive Vice President of Finance and Administration and the Chief Financial Officer of MICROS Systems, Inc. (“Registrant”), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 of the Registrant (the “Report”):

          (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

| Date: November 9, 2006 | /s/ Gary C. Kaufman |
|------------------------|---------------------|
|                   |                     |
|                   | Gary C. Kaufman     |
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS



I, Mark Buckrey, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of STEN Corporation;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date  May 10, 2006 | /s/ Mark Buckrey       
|------------------ | -----------------------
|                   | Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 16, 2015.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Chapelle Davis, Assistant Vice President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:

                    1.                     *First Mercantile Financial Corporation,*                     to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the outstanding shares of Putnam 1st Mercantile Bank, both of Cookeville, Tennessee.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 13, 2015.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-03427 Filed 2-18-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1248 

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to reform the Federal Reserve System. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2015 

Ms. WARREN (for herself and Mr. VITTER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to reform the Federal 

Reserve System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fed Accountability Act 

5 of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. OFFICE STAFF FOR MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF 

7 GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYS8 TEM. 

9 Section 11(l) of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 

10 248(l)) is amended by inserting ‘‘Of amounts made availVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:20 May 13, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1248.IS S1248

asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1248 IS

1 able for staff of the Federal Reserve System, each member 

2 of the Board of Governors may employ not more than 4 

3 individuals for the purpose of staffing the member’s office, 

4 with such individuals selected by such member and the sal5 aries of such individuals set by such member.’’ after the 

6 period at the end. 

7 SEC. 3. VOTE BY BOARD OF GOVERNORS ON CERTAIN SET8 TLEMENTS. 

9 Section 10 of the Federal Reserve Act is amended— 

10 (1) by redesignating paragraph (12) (12 U.S.C. 

11 247b) as paragraph (11); and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(12)(A) The Board of Governors of the Fed14 eral Reserve System shall vote, at a properly noticed 

15 public meeting of the Board, on whether to resolve 

16 any enforcement action if the resolution of that ac17 tion involves the payment of not less than 

18 $1,000,000 in compensation, penalties, or fines, or 

19 other payments. 

20 ‘‘(B) The results of the vote of each member of 

21 the Board under subparagraph (A) shall— 

22 ‘‘(i) be included at the appropriate place in 

23 the official minutes of the Board; and 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1248 IS

1 ‘‘(ii) be made publicly available on the 

2 website of the Board.’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1477 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1477

  To require a report on the future mix of aircraft platforms for the 
                             Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 2, 2015

  Mr. Rounds introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require a report on the future mix of aircraft platforms for the 
                             Armed Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Long Range Strike Aircraft Mix Act 
of 2015''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON FUTURE MIX OF AIRCRAFT PLATFORMS FOR THE ARMED 
              FORCES.

    (a) Report on Study Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
submit to Congress a report setting forth the results of a study, to be 
performed by an organization or entity independent of the Department of 
Defense selected by the Secretary for purposes of this section, that 
determines the following:
            (1) An optimized future mix of shorter range fighter-class 
        strike aircraft and long-range strike aircraft platforms for 
        the Armed Forces.
            (2) An appropriate future mix of manned aerial platforms 
        and unmanned aerial platforms for the Armed Forces.
    (b) Considerations in Determining Mix.--The mixes determined 
pursuant to the study shall be determined taking into account relevant 
portions of the defense strategy, critical assumptions, priorities, 
force-sizing construct, and cost.
    (c) Nonduplication of Effort.--If any information required under 
subsection (a) has been included in another report or notification 
previously submitted to Congress by law, the Secretary may provide a 
list of such reports and notifications at the time of submitting the 
report required by subsection (a) in lieu of including such information 
in the report required by subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
.p

OFFICE OF THE IIECARET AritY

March 13, 1969

.

Vall111.„

I :.

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

WASHINGTON 20330 terampeas

4

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. SEAMANS

I have forwarded to Mt. Packard a memorandum for

his signature (copy attached) appointing Dr. &Lucas

Director of the NRO as additional duty effective

March 17, 1969.

The attached memorandum for your signature delegates to Dr. &Lucas authority over SAFSS and SAFSP.

It is a paraphrase of the one Dr. Brown wrote in 1965

at the time of my appointment as Director of the NRO

(a copy is attached). Strictly, since the Under Secretary already has delegated to him virtually all authority vested in the Secretary, the memorandum confers no

new authority in Dr. McLucas. However, it does make

clear to the other Assistant Secretaries and the. Chief

of Staff that they are

Not expected to exercise their normal

functions or to act for you on NRO

matters

and

Take up any questions involving interaction of the NRO with normal Air Force

activities with Dr. Winces.

Alexander H. Flax

3 Attachments

Memo for signature

Copy of memo for

Mr. Packard's signature

. Copy of memo signed

y • lr. Brown, 9 Nov 1965

I.

2667-69

w

opy 104
**Exhibit 12.1**

 

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 

 

I, Peer M. Schatz, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of QIAGEN N.V; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting,or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

 

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this reportany change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

 

5. The company’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 18, 2005 

 

/s/ Peer M. Schatz

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of
our report dated July 29, 1999, relating to the financial statements of Sycamore
Networks, Inc., which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to
the references to us under the headings "Experts" and "Selected Financial Data"
in such Registration Statement.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
August 5, 1999