alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1334/2006

of 8 September 2006         

amending Regulation (EC) No 1299/2006 fixing the export refunds on syrup and certain other sugar products exported without further processing

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the market in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the fourth subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1299/2006 is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 9 September 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 September 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 10.

----

ANNEX

Export refunds on syrups and certain other sugar products exported without further processing applicable from 9 September 2006 (1)

----

(1)  The amounts set out in this Annex are not applicable with effect from 1 February 2005 pursuant to Council Decision 2005/45/EC of 22 December 2004 concerning the conclusion and application of the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 as regards the provisions applicable to processed agricultural products (OJ L 23, 26.1.2005, p. 17).

(1)  The basic amount is not applicable to the product defined under point 2 of the Annex to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3513/92 (OJ L 355, 5.12.1992, p. 12).

----
S. 136 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen 

An Act 

To amend chapter 21 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that fathers of 

certain permanently disabled or deceased veterans shall be included with mothers 

of such veterans as preference eligibles for treatment in the civil service. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gold Star Fathers Act of 2015’’. 

SEC. 2. PREFERENCE ELIGIBLE TREATMENT FOR FATHERS OF CERTAIN PERMANENTLY DISABLED OR DECEASED VETERANS. 

Section 2108(3) of title 5, United States Code, is amended 

by striking subparagraphs (F) and (G) and inserting the following: 

‘‘(F) the parent of an individual who lost his or her 

life under honorable conditions while serving in the armed 

forces during a period named by paragraph (1)(A) of this 

section, if— 

‘‘(i) the spouse of that parent is totally and permanently disabled; or 

‘‘(ii) that parent, when preference is claimed, is 

unmarried or, if married, legally separated from his 

or her spouse; 

‘‘(G) the parent of a service-connected permanently 

and totally disabled veteran, if— 

‘‘(i) the spouse of that parent is totally and permanently disabled; or 

‘‘(ii) that parent, when preference is claimed, is 

unmarried or, if married, legally separated from his 

or her spouse; and’’. 
S. 136—2 

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

The amendment made by this Act shall take effect 90 days 

after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 35 (Monday, February 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 9453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03591]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

National Nuclear Security Administration


Defense Programs Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Office of Defense Programs, National Nuclear Security 
Administration, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 14(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), and in accordance with title 41, Code 
of Federal Regulations, section 102-3.65(a), and following consultation 
with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services 
Administration, notice is hereby given that the Defense Programs 
Advisory Committee (DPAC) will be renewed for a two-year period 
beginning on February 12, 2015.
    The DPAC will provide advice and recommendations to the Deputy 
Administrator for Defense Programs on the stewardship and maintenance 
of the Nation's nuclear deterrent.
    Additionally, the renewal of the Committee has been determined to 
be essential to the conduct of the Department's business and to be in 
the public interest in connection with the performance of duties 
imposed upon the Department of Energy by law and agreement. The 
Committee will continue to operate in accordance with the provisions of 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act and the rules and regulations in 
implementation of that Act.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Loretta Martin, Office of Defense 
Programs, at (202) 586-7996.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 12, 2015.
Amy Bodette,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-03591 Filed 2-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS



I, Mark Buckrey, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of STEN Corporation (formerly Sterion Incorporated);

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  May 13, 2005 | /s/ Mark Buckrey       
|------------------- | -----------------------
|                    | Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                   Consent of Independent Public Accountants

To the Board of Trustees
at Cabot Industrial Trust:

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 29, 1999,
with respect to the combined statement of revenue and certain expenses of the
Stayton Drive and Corridor Proeprties for the year ended December 31, 1998,
included in this Form 8-K, into Cabot Industrial Trust's previously filed
Registration Statements on Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3 (File No. 333-71585),
Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-71565, 333-61543), and Form S-8 (File No. 333-65169).


                                                                        KPMG LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 30, 1999
#### State ex rel. Rowe, Respondent, vs. Minto, Town Clerk, and another, Appellants.

*January 30*

March *31, 1908.*

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Eau Claire county: E. W. Helms, Judge.

*Reversed.*

*Horace B. Walmsley,*for the appellants.

For the respondent there was a brief by *Wickham & Harr,*and oral argument by *James Wickham.*

*194Keewin, J.

This case is ruled hy *State etc ret Rowe v. Krumenauer, ante,*p. 185, 115 N. W. 798. Therefore the judgment below must be reversed.

*By the Court.*— The judgment is reversed, and the court below directed to dismiss the action.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
   
  We consent to the inclusion in this Registration Statement (No. 333-64233)
on Form S-1, as filed on January 26, 1999, of our report dated April 30, 1998,
except as to the information presented under Additional Financing in Notes 8
and 11 for which the date is September 21, 1998, and to the information
presented under Restatement of Financial Statements in Note 1 for which the
date is January 22, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Prodigy Communications Corporation as of December 31, 1996 and
1997 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1997, and
of our report dated September 10, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements of Prodigy Services Company for the year ended December
31, 1995 and the five and one-half month period ended June 16, 1996. We also
consent to the reference to our firm under the captions "Experts" and
"Selected Consolidated Financial Data."     
 
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
Boston, Massachusetts
   
January 25, 1999
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1499 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide eligibility under certain 

highway programs for projects for the installation of vehicle-to-infrastructure communication equipment, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 3, 2015 

Mr. PETERS (for himself, Mr. BLUNT, and Ms. STABENOW) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide eligibility 

under certain highway programs for projects for the installation of vehicle-to-infrastructure communication 

equipment, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vehicle-to-Infrastruc5 ture Safety Technology Investment Flexibility Act of 

6 2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1499 IS

1 SEC. 2. VEHICLE-TO-INFRASTRUCTURE COMMUNICATION 

2 EQUIPMENT PROJECTS. 

3 (a) VEHICLE-TO-INFRASTRUCTURE COMMUNICATION

4 EQUIPMENT DEFINED.—Section 101(a) of title 23, 

5 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(35) VEHICLE-TO-INFRASTRUCTURE COMMU8 NICATION EQUIPMENT.—The term ‘vehicle-to-infra9 structure communication equipment’ means equip10 ment that provides a wireless exchange of critical 

11 safety and operational data between highway infra12 structure and vehicles, intended primarily to avoid 

13 or mitigate vehicle collisions and enable a wide range 

14 of other safety, mobility, and environmental bene15 fits.’’. 

16 (b) ELIGIBLE PROJECTS UNDER NATIONAL HIGH17 WAY PERFORMANCE PROGRAM.—Section 119(d)(2) of 

18 such title is amended by adding at the end the following: 

19 ‘‘(Q) Installation of vehicle-to-infrastruc20 ture communication equipment.’’. 

21 (c) ELIGIBLE PROJECTS UNDER SURFACE TRANS22 PORTATION PROGRAM.—Section 133(b) of such title is 

23 amended by adding at the end the following: 

24 ‘‘(27) Installation of vehicle-to-infrastructure 

25 communication equipment.’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1499 IS

1 (d) ELIGIBLE PROJECTS UNDER HIGHWAY SAFETY

2 IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.—Section 148(a)(4)(B) of such 

3 title is amended by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(xxv) Installation of vehicle-to-infra5 structure communication equipment.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
98-2439.

#### Ricker v. John Deere Ins. Co.

Franklin App. No. 97APE11-1505. On motion to strike brief of *amicus curiae*Ohio Civil Rights Commission. Motion denied.

Cook, J., dissents.
# C_2005082EN.01001401.xml

| 2.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/14

---

Action brought on 1 February 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against Ireland

(Case C-38/05)

(2005/C 82/29)

Language of procedure: English

An action against Ireland was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 1 February 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Mr Barry Doherty, acting as agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission requests the Court

| — | to declare that Ireland has breached its obligations under Articles 15 (4), 18 (1), 19i first and third indents of Council Regulation (EEC) 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy (1), by failing to communicate the data required by those provisions for the years 1999 and 2000; and |
| --- | --- |

—

to declare that Ireland has breached its obligations under Articles 15 (4), 18 (1), 19i first and third indents of Council Regulation (EEC) 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy (1), by failing to communicate the data required by those provisions for the years 1999 and 2000; and

1

| — | to order Ireland to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

to order Ireland to pay the costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

Articles 15(4), 18(1) and 19i of Regulation 2847/93 require the Member States to transmit certain date by computer transmission within a specific deadline. It is essential that the Commission has this data available in order to manage and develop the common fisheries policy, in particular with regard to conservation, management and exploitation of living aquatic resources.

Ireland did not communicate the data required by the aforementioned Articles for the years 1999 or 2000 and is therefore in breach of its obligations.

---

(1)  OJ L 261, 20.10.1993, p. 1

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information from condensed financial
statements for the period ending July 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000350403
<NAME> GEOFF STANFORD
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,223
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,203
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     35,776
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,242
<PP&E>                                         269,117
<DEPRECIATION>                                 124,544
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 234,458
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,077
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           517
<OTHER-SE>                                      95,999
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   234,458
<SALES>                                         62,220
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,377
<CGS>                                           53,395
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,395
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,449
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,372
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,370
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,002
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,002
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38
        

</TABLE>
Order issued September/ & 2012 

In The 

otourt of Appeals 

1F.ift4 1llistrid of Wexas at m alias 

No. 05-11-01268-CR 

No. 05-11-01269-CR 

TIEN JUNG KUO, Appellant 

v. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-55962-J, F10-55963-J 

ORDER 

The Court REINSTATES the appeals. 

004:ti l'l·9' ...... ( 

On December 21, 2011, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the 

reporter's record has not been filed. On January 6, 2012, appellant's attorney filed a motion to 

dismiss the appeals. However, the motion did not comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

42.2(a) because it was not signed by both appellant and his attorney. We notified appellant of the 

defect in a letter dated January 9, 2012. To date, we have not received the trial court's findings, the 

reporter's record, nor a motion to dismiss the appeals that complies with rule 42.2(a). The appeals 

cannot proceed until the issue of the reporter's record is resolved. 

Accordingly, we 0 RD ER the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant 

has been deprived of the reporter's record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any other 
reason. 

• 

• 

• 

00409cl 

The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals. If the 

trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeals, it shall make 

a finding to that effect. 

If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeals, it shall next 

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs for 

the reporter's record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the trial 

court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, 

which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not 

indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeals. 

The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who 

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter's explanation for the delay in 

filing the reporter's record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter's record can be 

filed. 

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a supplemental record, containing the written findings 

of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within TIDRTY DAYS of the 

date of this order. 

The appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. They shall be 

reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is received, 

whichever is earlier. 

-2-

JJ~~ 

DA V1D L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         158,941
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               24,996,717
<ALLOWANCES>                                   480,000
<INVENTORY>                                 28,605,095
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            54,896,643
<PP&E>                                      50,245,561
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,380,847
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              89,337,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,738,682
<BONDS>                                     17,557,769
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,101,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                89,337,868
<SALES>                                    168,221,575
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           168,221,575
<CGS>                                      138,891,672
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              138,891,672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,142,831
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,304,205
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,882,867
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,291,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,591,867
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,591,867
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.66
        

</TABLE>