alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Pegasus Communications Corporation and subsidiaries on Forms S-8 and S-3 (File
Nos. 333-20357, 333-22823, 333-22845 and 333-23595) of our report dated
February 26, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Pegasus Communications Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the years ended
December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ Coopers & Lybrand LLP
-------------------------

2400 Eleven Penn Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 31, 1998
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 33 (Thursday, February 19, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8948]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03511]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, March 12, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Theresa Singleton at 1-888-912-1227 or 
202-317-3329.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee will be held Thursday, March 12, 2015, 
at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to 
make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due 
to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must 
be made with Theresa Singleton. For more information please contact: 
Theresa Singleton at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-3329, TAP Office, 1111 
Constitution Avenue NW., Room 1509-National Office, Washington, DC 
20224, or contact us at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include a discussion on various letters, and other 
issues related to written communications from the IRS.

    Dated: February 12, 2015.
Otis Simpson,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2015-03511 Filed 2-18-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
HomeRadioactive WasteWaste Incidental to Reprocessing

# Disposal Process for Waste Incidental to Reprocessing

For all of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) WIR consultations with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the NRC serves in an advisory capacity and its advice does not constitute regulatory approval. For more information about NRC WIR responsibilities, see the Responsibilities for Waste Incidental to Reprocessing page. For more information about the locations of WIR disposal facilities in the United States, see the following: Locations of Disposal Facilities for WIR.

## Sites Under Section 3116 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005:

In October 2004, Congress enacted the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (NDAA). For the DOE sites located in NDAA Section 3116 Covered States (i.e., currently Idaho and South Carolina), DOE consults with NRC on draft waste determinations and NRC monitors DOE disposal actions in coordination with the Covered State to determine whether DOE complies with the performance objectives set forth in Subpart C of Title 10, Part 61, of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR Part 61), "Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste." For more information about NRC monitoring activities under the NDAA, see the following: Monitoring of Disposal Actions for WIR.

## Sites Not Under Section 3116 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005:

For DOE sites from 1997 through 2003 and since 2004 for DOE sites not located in NDAA Covered States (i.e., currently Idaho and South Carolina), DOE has periodically consulted with the NRC in the course of its waste determination process.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 8, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Responsibilities for Waste Incidental to Reprocessing
          - Waste Determination Process
          - Disposal Process
          - National Defense Authorization Act
          - West Valley Demonstration Project Act

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, June 8, 2020
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-19-00210-CR

KYLE ANDREW BUTLER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 6th District Court

Lamar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 27535

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

A Lamar County jury convicted Kyle Andrew Butler of two counts of indecency with a 

child. As a result, Butler was sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment for each offense. On 

appeal, Butler argues that a mistrial based on juror deadlock was improperly declared in the prior 

trial of this case. 

Butler’s charges in this case were consolidated for trial with a charge for aggravated sexual 

assault of a child brought in companion cause number 06-19-00209-CR. We addressed the issue 

raised by Butler in this appeal in our opinion of this date on Butler’s appeal in cause number 06-

19-00209-CR. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude in this matter that the trial 

court did not abuse its discretion in granting a mistrial and that Butler consented to the mistrial. 

As a result, we overrule Butler’s sole point of error in this appeal. 

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: April 7, 2020

Date Decided: April 14, 2020

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OFGOLD BANC CORPORATION, INC.

I Malcolm
M. Aslin, Chief Executive Officer of Gold Banc Corporation, Inc. hereby certify, in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that:

| | (a) | The
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, which accompanies this
certification, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (b) | The
information contained in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005, which accompanies this certification, fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Gold Banc Corporation, Inc.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                      |  | By: /s/ MALCOLM M. ASLIN                | 
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------- | 
|Date:  March 13, 2006 |  | Malcolm M. AslinChief Executive Officer |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7124

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LEROY RAGIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior

District Judge. (CR-90-25-P, CA-94-379-3-CV-P)

Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 16, 1997

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leroy Ragin, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Wayne Miller, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina; B. Frederic

Williams, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte,

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Leroy Ragin appeals the district court's order dismissing his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We affirm.

Ragin contends that because he was subjected to both criminal

penalties and the civil forfeiture of his real property, his conviction violated the Double Jeopardy Clause. We note initially that

Ragin's property was forfeited pursuant to a consent judgment, but

further review of the record reveals that it was seized as forfeitable under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(7) (1994), a statute found categorically not to constitute criminal punishment for purposes of the

Double Jeopardy Clause. United States v. Ursery, ___ U.S. ___, 64

U.S.L.W. 4565, 4572 (U.S. June 24, 1996) (Nos. 95-345, 95-346). For

these reasons, we affirm the district court's dismissal of Ragin's

motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2005115EN.01000101.xml

| 14.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/1

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 3 March 2005

in Case C-428/02 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret) Fonden Marselisborg Lystbådehavn v Skatteministeriet, and Skatteministeriet v Fonden Marselisborg Lystbådehavn (1)

1

(Sixth VAT Directive - Article 13B(b) - Exemptions - Leasing of immovable property - Letting of premises and sites for parking vehicles - Mooring berths for boats - Land storage sites for boats)

(2005/C 115/01)

Language of the case: Danish

In Case C-428/02: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Vestre Landsret (Denmark), made by decision of 15 November 2002, received at the Court on 26 November 2002, in the proceedings Fonden Marselisborg Lystbådehavn v Skatteministeriet, and Skatteministeriet v Fonden Marselisborg Lystbådehavn — the Court (Third Chamber), composed of A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, A. Borg Barthet, J.-P. Puissochet, J. Malenovský and U. Lõhmus (Rapporteur), Judges; J. Kokott, Advocate General; H. von Holstein, Deputy Registrar, gave a judgment on 3 March 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | Article 13B(b) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 92/111/EEC of 14 December 1992, must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of letting of immovable property includes the letting of both water-based mooring berths for pleasure boats and land sites for storage of boats on port land. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 13B(b) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 92/111/EEC of 14 December 1992, must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of letting of immovable property includes the letting of both water-based mooring berths for pleasure boats and land sites for storage of boats on port land.

| 2. | Article 13B(b)(2) of Sixth Directive 77/388, as amended by Directive 92/111, must be interpreted as meaning that the definition of ‘vehicles’ includes boats. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 13B(b)(2) of Sixth Directive 77/388, as amended by Directive 92/111, must be interpreted as meaning that the definition of ‘vehicles’ includes boats.

---

(1)  OJ C 55 of 08.03.2003.

1

---
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-89,522-01

EX P ARTE MARIO SIF UENTEZ, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. CR-16- 0669-A IN THE 428 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM HAYS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1 9 6 7 ). Applicant was convicted of driving while intox icated a

nd sentenc ed to forty-five year s’ imprisonment. Applicant contends, among other things, that his co u n s el rende red ineffe ctive assistance beca use counse l failed to timely file a noticeof appe al. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Strickland v. W

ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson , 993 S.W .2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); Ex parte Axe l , 757 S.W .2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). In these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d.2

As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial cour t is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. The trial court shall order cou n s el t o provide a supplemental aff

idavit in response to Applicant’s claim of ineffe ctive assistance of counsel addre ssing, at a minimum , whether he deter mined if Applicant wanted to appea l. The trial court may use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)

. I f the trial c ourt elec ts to hold a hearing, it sha ll de termine whe ther Applica nt is indi g ent. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall ap p o i nt an attorney to repre sent Applicant at the hearing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw as t o wh ether Applicant

was denied his rig ht to a meaning ful appea l beca use Applicant’s counsel failed to timely file a notice of appe al. The tria l court shall make spe cific f indings a ddressingwhether trial counsel discha

rg ed his duties in acc ordanc e with the requirements of Jones v. State , 98 S.W .3d 7 0 0 , 7 0 3 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). The trial court shall also make any other finding s of fac t and conclusions of law that it deems re levant and a

ppropriate to the dispositi on of Applica nt’s claim for ha

beas c orpus re lief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s of this order

. A sup p l em en t al t ranscript containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, alongwith the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court within 120 day s of the date of this order. Any extensions of ti me must be re quested by

the trial cour

t and shall be obtaine d from this Court. Filed: Mar ch 20, 2019 Do not publish
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**Pursuant to Section 905 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, GeorgesBenarroch, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of Osprey Gold Corp.., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), do herebycertify, to the best of my knowledge, that:(1) the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the **nine months ended September 30, 2007**, asfiled with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies, inall material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.         Date: November 9, 2007     By: /s/ Georges Benarroch             Georges Benarroch      Acting President & Chief Executive Officer      And Acting Chief Financial Officer  
18
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections                           ( print page 8888)                        552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel; Pediatric Cardiac Genomics Consortium.                    

*Date:*                         March 11, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hilton Garden Inn Washington DC/Bethesda, 7301 Waverly Street, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         YingYing Li-Smerin, MD, Ph.D, Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7184, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-435-0277,                         *lismerin@nhlbi.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 12, 2015.

Michelle Trout,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-03345 Filed 2-18-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the Unaudited Statements of Operations and Accumulated
Deficit for the Six Months Ended June 30, 1998 and the
Unaudited Balance Sheet at June 30, 1998 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         353,081
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  365,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    140,582
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               860,053
<PP&E>                                         325,876
<DEPRECIATION>                                 311,611
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 874,318
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,691
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,000
<COMMON>                                       122,824
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   874,318
<SALES>                                        665,397
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               671,353
<CGS>                                          403,327
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  548,714
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,272
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,114
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                101,253
<INCOME-TAX>                                   101,253
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            101,253
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   101,253
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>