alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-TOP-SECRETIS/ NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. O.C.

THE NRO STAFF 15 July 1971

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. NAKA

COL BRADBURN

SUBJECT: Monthly Forecast

Reference is made to etter of 1 July, same

subject, and Dr. McLucas' orecasts for SR-71

North Korean overflights.

The MC has recently briefed Mr. Packard on the SR-71

overflights and has his concurrence to include them in the monthly

forecast. Arrangements have been made to present the same

briefing to Dr. McLucas at 1615 hours 16 July in his office. The

JRC plans to present the same briefing to Dr. Kissinger.

It is recommended that you attend the briefing for Dr. McLucas.

Mr. Hill from the SOC will attend.

Cy Turn: SS-5,

-TOP-SEORET--

maim Pew wipsaisc siesawes

see NNCflVI SIN IS MSS WS seep

OSIMISL Internal 

OMt M SWISS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       6,460,519
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,985,055
<ALLOWANCES>                                   368,000
<INVENTORY>                                    655,356
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,468,192
<PP&E>                                       5,268,404
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,640,330
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,398,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,019,855
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       136,545
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,398,463
<SALES>                                     11,528,518
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,528,518
<CGS>                                        2,340,290
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,340,290
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            23,120,369
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (13,932,141)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (13,932,141)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.10)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF

AXTIVE CORPORATION



|                                |  |                      
|------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|Name                            |  | State ofIncorporation
|UDT Consulting, Inc.            |  | Texas                
|                                | 
|Media Resolutions, Incorporated |  | Texas                
|                                | 
|Virtually There, Inc.           |  | Texas                
|                                | 
|The Visionary Group, Inc.       |  | Texas                
|                                | 
|Visual Edge Systems, Inc.       |  | Texas                
|                                | 
|ThinkSpark Corporation          |  | Delaware
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1079

EDWARD P. CRAIG, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; MARK W. EVERSON, Director, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-03-908-A) Submitted: March 25, 2004 Decided: April 1, 2004 Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward P. Craig, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth L. Greene, Karen Deborah Utiger, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Edward P. Craig, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint in which he sought a refund of income taxes. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Craig v. Internal Rev. Serv. , No. CA-03-908-A (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 23, 2003; entered Dec. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
List of Subsidiaries of the Company
                                  Exhibit 21.1


     NAME                             STATE  OF  INCORPORATION  OR  ORGANIZATION
     ----                             ------------------------------------------

Chancellor  Capital                                                  Nevada

Big  Tyme  Food  Marts,  Inc.                                        Nevada

Nevada  Housing  Opportunities  Manager,  LLC                        Nevada

RealNet  Commercial  Brokerage,  Inc.                                Nevada

Maxim  Homes,  Inc.                                                    Utah

Diamond  Key  Homes,  Inc.                                          Arizona

Diamond  Key  Construction,  LLC                                    Arizona

HomeBanc  Mortgage  Corporation                                     Arizona

Levitz  Plaza  Manager,  Inc.                                        Nevada

Saxton  Arizona  Construction,  Inc.                                Arizona

Saxton  Nevada,  Inc.                                                Nevada

Saxton  Utah  Construction                                             Utah

Saxton  Utah  Inc.                                                     Utah

Max  Management,  Inc.                                                 Utah

All  subsidiaries  listed  above  are  wholly-owned  by  Saxton  Incorporated.
eventos 17, 1359

Signads

‘elintyre

wivgbory

'
.
4

oY
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Unified Grocers, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended
January 1, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard J. Martin, Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
for the periods presented in the Report.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 15, 2011



/s/    Richard J. MartinRichard J. MartinExecutive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
National Reconnaissance Office Release

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release #05-16

Contact: (703) 808-5050 July 28, 2016

NROL-61 Lifts Off on July 28, 2016

A National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) payload was launched successfully 

aboard a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket from Space Launch Complex-41, 

Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS), Florida, at 8:37 a.m. EDT, on 

July 28, 2016.

“The successful launch of NROL-61 is another tremendous achievement in a 

series of accomplishments we have had so far this year. This launch — and the 

launch last month of NROL-37 also from the Cape — would not have been 

possible if it weren’t for the hard work, dedication, and teamwork of our people 

and our Air Force and industry partners. This was a very good day for America 

and for our national security interests,” said Colonel Clint Hunt, USAF, NROL-61 

Mission Director, NRO Office of Space Launch.

NROL-61 is the third of four launches for 2016. The next NRO launch is 

scheduled for December, from Vandenberg Air Force Base, California.

-NROThe NRO is a joint Department of Defense-Intelligence Community organization responsible for 

developing, launching, and operating America’s intelligence satellites to meet the national 

security needs of our nation.
•

•

rV.111441114111111116M1L&P . ••

ryIR Ikuf—ions: Hq USAF '•

v1Punevions: SSD Satellite

Control Facilities

I • • "'

: •

1,6

411111111111:. • ' The attached page was handed to me by Raj

moo :.. on 2 September. . . . .

..- ,

. • . . :

It contains a) one of the FINDINGS of the 2-man IG

:

(for safety) Project Team that visited the ANICIP and • • ;. ...,"..'

b) the rebuttal prepared by AFSC on this particular finding:I;

having to do with security. restriction as they apply to ;•,'!`

recovery of unclassified payloads. :Y.-% •

• • : • •

•L •?

, - • . • •

. • •

n•• ;

. • • 1 .., - • •

.

.

••

•••

. • •

• . • . ••

.

. • • • ..

.. • „ • • • e' •

•

. •

- .-- •• --•••-rig••... .. • •• . :. - ...• •,. • 7 • ... •... • • s . i• . •

. ' •

.• • •• 'Cr• . — ' • • .. .' • •

. , : .. • . . .f. .T. • ',. •4..

7 ' u• • •‘ . . . •

.. : • • • . ; •• 4••••• i• ..• . le ' . ..•;,.'s

•

.• :

a: • a • ,

.

.,. •

. • ,•?..•

.;• • • , •

.• • . • •••,•

, • „

• • •• .• •

1

.. •

•

. • .

•

• .• :.• ".•

• ••• • •• ••• .• • e'• •••

e 4.•• II. :v. 4..•

•• • . a'•

. •

• •.• • r,

.• • •••:.„

.•

:

. : •

•••

• •• . -

ON".

"

t ;. ••••

ks. .•:,-

••

-

•

- I •

'• tie"' •

. • :r••• • '

. . •

r • ••

.•

••• r•-;• . •

.• •

•

, •r":

..;
•

•••• f••• •11 Mili•••nnn••••
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**SECTION      1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

| A. | The Report fully complies with the requirements              of              Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;              and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |
|--------|--------|
| B. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August                7, 2007 |   |   |                                                                                 |
|------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                          |   |   | /s/              Hugh S. Potts,              Jr.                                     |
|                                          |   |   | Hugh                S. Potts, Jr.Chairman                and Chief Executive Officer |

----
National Reconnaissance Office

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release 03-19

Contact: (703) 808-5050 June 3, 2019

NRO Awards Commercial Imagery Study Contracts

The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) today announced the awarding of three commercial 

imagery study contracts to BlackSky Global (www.blacksky.com), Maxar Technologies 

(www.maxar.com), and Planet (www.planet.com). Dr. Troy Meink (Director, Geospatial 

Intelligence Directorate) announced the awards during his presentation at the U.S. Geospatial 

Intelligence Forum 2019 GEOINT Symposium in San Antonio, TX. 

“Commercial imagery is an essential part of our current and future overhead architecture and it 

represents a new way of doing business at the NRO,” Meink noted in his presentation. While 

commercial imagery has long been a staple for warfighters, Meink emphasized that given the 

increasingly complex and dynamic national security environment, the NRO plans to take full 

advantage of the U.S. commercial remote sensing market to build an even more responsive, 

robust, and affordable GEOINT architecture. “For close to a decade, Maxar (DigitalGlobe) has 

supported our national security mission,” added Meink. “And now, we are pleased to expand 

our commercial partnerships with the addition of BlackSky Global and Planet, both of which 

offer exciting new capabilities.”

The NRO will use these study contracts to assess the performance capabilities of these domestic 

commercial satellite imagery providers and validate their ability to satisfy U.S. government 

requirements into the 2023 timeframe. The results will help inform the next generation of 

NRO’s commercial imagery procurements, expected to commence in late 2020. 

In 2017, the NRO became the primary agency responsible for commercial imagery acquisition in 

support of intelligence and defense missions. Then, in 2018, the EnhancedView commercial 

imagery contract transitioned from the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency to the NRO. The 

awarding of these new commercial imagery study contracts signifies the latest milestone in the 

NRO’s commercial imagery acquisition and integration strategy.

-NROThe NRO is an element of the Intelligence Community and a Department of Defense agency 

responsible for developing, launching, and operating America’s intelligence satellites to meet 

the national security needs of our nation.
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: November 20, 2014 TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR - 2013 - 0602 FROM: Rob Lawrence

EPA/Region 6/PD SUBJECT: July 1 0, 2014 Call with Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality r egarding

the Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants **SUMMARY** A conference call was made by EPA to the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality and the a ttendees listed below on Ju ly 1 0, 2014, to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants , which was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES** Participants: Tegan Treadaway, Vivian Aucoin, and Mike Vince EPA Participant s: Mark Hansen, Clovis Steib, Terry Johnson, and Guy Donaldson (Region 6) and Brian Fisher, and Kristen Bremer (OAR)
National Reconnaissance Office Satellite 

Successfully Launched

7 November 1997

CAPE CANAVERAL AIR STATION, Fla. --

A National Reconnaissance Office satellite was successfully launched aboard a Titan IV rocket 

from Space Launch Complex 41 here at 9:05 p.m. Eastern Standard Time today. The NRO, 

which designed and built the satellite, will also operate it. The launch was a team effort between 

the NRO, the Cape's 5th Space Launch Squadron and the Lockheed Martin Astronautics 

Corporation. "The Titan team hit another home run with the launch of this critical, national 

defense payload," said Brig. Gen. Randall Starbuck, commander of the 45th Space Wing at 

Patrick AFB, which is responsible for launches from Cape Canaveral AS. "We are very proud to 

contribute to our national security at home and abroad with this significant launch.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                      5
<CURRENCY>                    US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.00000
<CASH>                                           4,364,743
<SECURITIES>                                     2,194,363
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,687,383
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (6,924,354)
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,466,427
<PP&E>                                           2,586,685
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (966,142)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,086,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,333,148
<BONDS>                                                  5
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               79,968
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (3,597,001)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,086,970
<SALES>                                          6,257,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,257,900
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,560,970
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,634,307
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,938,300
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,664,161
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,539,838)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,539,838)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,703,017
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,836,821)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.610)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.610)
        


</TABLE>
41
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON

Ormce OF THE SECRETARY SEP 2.0 1990 .

JOSEPH V. CHARYK
Inder Secretary of the Air Foros
#### Kola Lumber Company, Appellant, vs. Stoughton Wagon Company, Respondent.

*September 14*—

October *4, 1910.*

*Appeal: Findings, when disturbed.*

Upon evidence fairly justifying either of two inferences, the de cisión of the trial court must control.

Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for Dane county: E. Kay Stevens, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Plaintiff brings this action to recover tbe purchase price of a carload of wagon bottoms shipped by it to defendant without any order from defendant requesting it so to do. The bottoms so shipped were used by defendant. Prior to the making of the shipment the defendant had entered into an executory contract with the Ellisville Lumber Company to furnish it a number of wagon bottoms. A jury was waived, and the trial court found that the car in question was shipped in part execution of the contract between the Ellis-ville Lumber Company and the defendant; that it was shipped by the plaintiff for and upon the credit of the Ellis-ville Lumber Company; and that the Ellisville Lumber Company and not the plaintiff was the real party in interest. On the findings so made judgment was entered dismissing the complaint.

For the appellant there was a brief by *Tenney, Hall •&*Tenney, and oral argument by *F. W. Hall.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Olin •& Butler,*and oral argument by *H. L. Butter.*

Babnes, J.

If any contract relation existed between plaintiff and defendant, it existed by implication only. Certain facts were testified to from which the court might well have inferred an implied contract on the part of the defend*330ant to pay plaintiff for tbe lumber. Other facts were shown from which it could be legitimately inferred that the plaintiff shipped the lumber in part execution of the contract between the Ellisville Lumber Company and the defendant and upon the credit of the Ellisville Lumber Company. It is as logical to draw the latter inference from the evidence as it is the former.

° “Upon evidence fairly justifying either of two inferences,, the decision of the.trial court must control.” *Spuhr v. Kolb, 111*Wis. 119, 120, 86 N. W. 562.

It is not the custom of this court to embody in its opinions the evidence sustaining the findings of trial courts, inasmuch as no useful purpose would be served by so doing.

*By the Court.-*— Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32




CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of BPO Management Services,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1.  
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
      April 15, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Patrick
      A. DolanPatrick
      A. DolanChief
      Executive Officer




Dated:
      April 15, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Donald
      W. RutherfordDonald
      W. RutherfordChief
      Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
ex10-2.htm


    Exhibit
10.2

    


    First
Amendment

    to

    Employment
Agreement

    


    This
First Amendment (the
“First Amendment”) to Employment Agreement is made
this 27h day of
September, 2008, by and between ImageWare Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”), on the one hand, and Wayne Wetherell, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company, on the other
hand (the “Executive”).  

    


    WHEREAS, the Company and the
Executive entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of September 27, 2005
(the “Employment Agreement”); and

    


    WHEREAS, the Executive
continues to perform valuable services for the Company and the Company desires
to assure itself of the continuing services of Executive; and

    


    WHEREAS, in consideration of
the foregoing and in order to amend the terms of the Agreement and to provide
for the continued services of the Executive in accordance with the present
intent of the Company and the Executive.

    


    NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration,
receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and in further consideration of the
mutual covenants contained in the Employment Agreement, the parties do hereby
agree that the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

    


    Section “2. Term of
Agreement”  strike the
language “continue until the third anniversary of the Effective Date” and
replace it with “continue until June 30, 2009”.

    


    


    


    


    
      	
              _________________________________

            	
              _________________________________

            
	
              ImageWare
      Systems, Inc.

            	
              Wayne Wetherell