alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001017358                    
<NAME>                        Sprint Spectrum Finance Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,497
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,497)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
'COPY

J 1Kge. ;

e 4210)Z

YMM4 COON ANDO AXIOM OEM

TO coma AMID LOB Ammo 45 CALIF

ET

Alt/6/333t, wry cu WD1 .• KGB,

4D?) , vIC...VEYTED FOR YM ISIVINATION AND ACTICE IS A NESSUS! niom oSlY ARK, WED 24 Jung 3959. QM'S. --091PIENSTIAL CITE rep

961.4L2 P104 ARPA acepos. PAM D1121.AL ARkx FY 196o BUICCT

DrIVNIOIATIM MONA ,THS XLUIHIME AHEM MOUNTS SHOULD BE SSW AS atualet. tenettotaits Out/Wourntr,.$3.3sagio,coo.

*Ving UMWOP 'PENDINN Al ARPA PHOORPX WM.

TEAT mercy OIP THE MOM* 60 A lefeCNERAELE MM. le/

DISCOYSSBOtal316,01:0 ASO WOR OCESTEPTION OR TEE EXTENSION OF THE SERIES.

/3/MIIIAS p000,0130 OF ARPA FUNDS. IT 18 AMMO TEAT $28 . 9

•

•

PAGE NO •

iinz.xon of Ai, MOE AS miclwil Ii =ran DEVELOPNINT PLAN WILL BE

AVA1LAILI AT OCR TINS ASISMS1 U 28 AP ROVED. PAM Oran PROGRAM cotate. wilmA..Atisliiptp*A7 .03 111CRWIOWIT nt norms TO TEE MOVE CAS BS 00011010 OW AIM Vie, 1 ni DIPERATM THAT YOU CONMICIOR WORT TO STAY THE MONTS AVAILABLE. TOO ARE REQUEMED T.3

stew =ZIP. INOICWINIKI AND POMO PLANS BASED ON ISE ABOVE striflocs AS lawASPiamnut AWPA PHDS= STAPP (ILL VISIT BM FOR

NoORAK UMW a taw 1110141. PAM 101D211O PASSAGE .ce APPROPRIATIon

AND APPoincesurt PYAOStrAlmnio Arna. BE 011 .A, wintax

ADVISE_ l'OR SACS NOT* 4111.Y AND AIMS? MN PROOECT. •

2.1.36E •

1..

0
**Exhibit 31.1**
****CERTIFICATIONS****
     I, A.L. Giannopoulos, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MICROS Systems,Inc. (the “Registrant”);
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
     4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15(e)) [*clause omitted pursuant to SECRelease Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986*] for the Registrant and we have:
          a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure  controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that  material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated  subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly  during the period in which this report is being prepared; 
          b) [*paragraph  omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986*];
          c) evaluated  the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this  report based on such evaluation; and 
          d) disclosed  in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial  reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter  that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,  the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 
     5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation  of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize  and report financial information; and
          b) any  fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees  who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial  reporting.  By: /s/ A.L. GiannopoulosA.L. GiannopoulosChairman, President andChief Executive Officer
Date: November 14, 2003
37 

DORIAN/GAWB12/RUFF 

HANDLE VIA ByEMAN TALENT-KEY 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

Page 1 of page 

mwor_3 or copies 

seat .3 r a sop37-66A. 4 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

11111111111111111 11 0003111111111111111 

HANDLE ViA ByEmil TALENT-KEYHOLE 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

MMIORANDUtilkelLIL FLAX 

SWIM MEL *marls= &tailor Briefing few Secretary 

Defames 

In early July 3966, a NZ presentation teas gives to 

Mr. lieNserera on the West Coast. Awing dissuasions at that 

presentation Dr. Brown suggested that it nould be useful for 

Mr. Meaware to review at sane later date additional inferMUM relative to the performance of the DOMAN sensor. In 

reeponaela peasitation was prepare& structured as a resume 

of the factors - to achieving gonad resolution with the 0Ezi - ca, together with a annesry 

the recent coaperlsone of a Ideally weaszneed grates using the 

DOR IAN mem, with the KOL configuration. 

On 1 Septemiter 1966, sthen von sere not OrianSlitet 

Dr. Brown Iftlat given a "dry run" of this pe tion at his 

request. 

With but feu chews, Dr. Brow agreed with the SeePe 

and content of the presentatine, and rapeseed that it be 

redaaced to printed tom 140=larlided by a beat tierlatile 

It las Dr. Bratees intention to foreword the presentation in 

this lime to Mr. lialionam for initasavtiaa. mat to rata that a 

verbal briefing was also available if mare detail use desire& 

Attached are two copies of the document requested by 

Dr.. Brown for your review, and subsequent •tranatittal. The 

comas of General S` '91x4 have been included. 

••••••■■••••■••11M 

Copies to: 

SAFSLM File 

Green Read 

2 Atch 

a/s 

NAM L. MIS 

titij General, taw 

Vice Director, NO& 

EXCLUDED 7ROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING; 

DOD DIR. 5200.10 DOES NOT APPLY
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

sountivelammoun • 

ZCZCFTC333XPOPPOTZ 

8.1 

xxxxx 

- ti.-AFSS 

GA6 

WORKING COPY 

sEcRET3022$82 Jug 69 CITE 2117 

'INFO PIS*, ONG, CHARGE 

OCR IAN 

TO J. ORVOEN4 JoMET? (PASS TO $UOV411IIIIIII 

0. QUIGOINS/INFot BRISK, D. SCHAEFFER/Mt, R. ROSE R. MD/ 

cNAINGE, J. FITZPATRICK FROM H. CONES 

SUBJECT: VOL SECuRITY POLICY ON CONTRACTOR'S SOLICITATION of NEW 

BUSINESS. 

1. CANCELLATION OF THE VOL NOONAN IN NO SAY ALTERS THE SECURITY 

POCKY WITH RESPECT To CONTRACTOR SOLICITATION OF NEW BUSINESS.. 

SPECIFIC GUIDELINES SPELLED OUT IN THE um, ENTITLED °NOL SEiOR 7 

PoLICY ON NOL CONTRACTOR'S SOL ICiTATION OF NEW SIMMERS* (OCTM 

REwAIR TOTALLY IN FORCE AND SHOULD SE INCLUDED IN yOuR COWMAN'S 

FUTURE PLANNING, SPECIFIC ATTENTION 1$ DIRECTED TO PARASNAPH 

001 CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS *UST MAIN TIE APPROVAL 

CT THE MCI. SySTEWS OFFICE PRIOR TO (1) USING NOL TECHNICAL DATA IN 

RESPONOING TO ANY REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR THE US IMMINENT, ANY 

OTHER CONERNmENT, OR ANY commERctAL OR NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION, 

(2) ENGAGING IN ANY "Vilna ACTIVITY, OR SEWN UNSOLICITE0 

PROPOSALS USING ANY REFERENCES TO, OR DATA FRON, TNE MOL MORAN 

TO ANY POTENTIAL MATCHER." 

SECRET 

ST 

N 

11 

di
DUDLEY C.

Secretary of the Air Force

NO: 116.1

DATE August 31, 1960

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE

ORDER

SUBJECT: The Director of the SAMOS Project

Effective this date, Brigadier General Robert E. Greer,

Assistant. Chief of Staff for Guided Missiles, is

designated as Director of the SANDS Project, with addi tional duty 'as Vice Commander for Satellite Systems,

AFBMD, ARM, with duty station at 2400 East El Segundo Boulevard, El Segundo, California.

The Director will organize- an office to manage the SANDS

Project. Manpower to staff the office will be drawn

from manpower available to him as Vice Commander for

Satellite Systems. The .SAMOS Project Office will be a field extension of the Office of the Secretary of the

Air Force.

•

The Director is responsible to and will report directly

to the Secretary of the Air Force.

Additional duties may be assigned to the Director as

deemed appropriate by the Secretary of the Air Force..

A11110 NON 0• 111111. IT MU Ell
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 141 

To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

providing for the Independent Payment Advisory Board. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 8, 2015 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself, Ms. AYOTTE, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. 

BOOZMAN, Mr. BURR, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. COATS, Mr. COCHRAN, Ms. 

COLLINS, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. DAINES, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. HELLER, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. 

ISAKSON, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. KIRK, Mr. MORAN, Mr. PAUL, Mr. 

PORTMAN, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. SCOTT, Mr. THUNE, Mr. 

TILLIS, Mr. TOOMEY, and Mr. WICKER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act providing for the Independent Payment Advisory Board. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Seniors’ 

5 Access to Medicare Act of 2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 141 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE INDEPENDENT PAYMENT ADVI2 SORY BOARD. 

3 Effective as of the enactment of the Patient Protec4 tion and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148), sec5 tions 3403 and 10320 of such Act (including the amend6 ments made by such sections) are repealed, and any provi7 sion of law amended by such sections is hereby restored 

8 as if such sections had not been enacted into law. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

14675 Lee Road

Chantilly, VA 20151-1715

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release #10-12

Contact: (703) 808-5050 Aug. 30, 2012

NRO Participates in NASA Radiation Belt Storm Probes Launch

Two Radiation Belt Storm Probes launched from Cape Canaveral, Florida,

aboard a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket for NASA at 4:05 a.m.

contained two Relativistic Proton Spectrometers (RPS) developed by the 

National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) as part of its payload.

The RPS instrument focuses on the inner radiation belt, an area that houses 

some of the highest energy protons in Earth's magnetic environment. These 

protons move fast enough that no shielding can stop them. To study these 

particles, the RPS instrument measures the protons' energy and how their 

intensity varies over time. This will help scientists understand how the inner belt 

changes in response to solar activity.

Also the NRO, working with the Air Force Research Laboratory, Aerospace 

Corporation, Los Alamos Laboratory, and Naval Research Laboratory, has

produced a next-generation radiation belt model, AP (E)-9. Currently, the 

standard space environment specification used by the engineering community is 

the NASA AE-8 and AP-8 trapped radiation belt models. The AE (P)-9 offers 

improvements in terms of radiation hazards specified, accuracy and uncertainty 

qualification, spectral and spatial coverage, and time-correlated probability of 

occurrence statistics. 

“Having a new way to look at the radiation belt will be a great tool for the NRO, 

as well as other members of the space community, to better protect our current 

satellite systems, help in the design of new systems, and expand orbit options, all 

of which will help NRO’s mission and be cost effective,” said 

Dr. David Byers, Program Manager for the NRO Proton Spectrometer Belt 

Research program. 

Data from the probes will be shared with the public on the Radiation Belt Storm 

Probes website at http://rbsp.jhuapl.edu/index.php.

The NRO is a joint Department of Defense-Intelligence Community organization 

responsible for developing, launching, and operating America’s signals, imagery, 

and communications intelligence satellites to meet the national security needs of 

our nation. 
-NRO-
Exhibit 99.1



Certification of Disclosure Pursuant to 17 C.F.R. 240.13a-14 or 15d-14

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Metin Colpan, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of QIAGEN N.V.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the Evaluation Date); and



c)
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls;
and



6. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: March 31, 2003



|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|/s/    METIN COLPAN                          
|Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1079/2006

of 13 July 2006         

fixing the maximum export refund on common wheat in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 936/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified from 7 to 13 July 2006, pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 936/2006, the maximum refund on exportation of common wheat shall be 1,99 EUR/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 14 July 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 July 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 172, 24.6.2006, p. 3.

(3)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

----
#### Anderson, Appellant, vs. Savoy, Respondent.

*February 4*

*February 22, 1910.*

*Sales: Breach by vendor: Damages.*

Where, after breach by the vendor of a .contract to furnish ice to a retailer, the latter made no reasonable effort to procure ice elsewhere, although he might have obtained plenty of it at, or for less than, the contract price, and no actual damage from the breach is shown, only nominal damages are recoverable.

Ajppeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha •county: MaRtiw L. Lueck, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

This is a second appeal from judgment in the same action, reported 137 Wis. 44, 118 N. W. 217. Upon remittitur, the cause was referred to a referee to take evidence upon-the question of damages, and was then heard in court upon the evidence so taken and upon some other evidence offered in open ■court. The court found the contract as stated upon the former appeal; the breach thereof by the defendant substantially an there set forth; that the wholesale price of ice during the'season of 1904 was from sixty cents to $1 per ton; that there were three wholesale concerns dealing at wholesale in ice in the city of Milwaukee, where plaintiff carried on a retail business; that plaintiff made no application to such wholesalers, although they were dealing in ice of the kind required by him- in his contract, and made no reasonable effort to procure ice to take the place of that which' the defendant failed to furnish. Accordingly the court rendered judgment for the plaintiff for six cents damages; also judgment for the defendant upon its counterclaim for the unpaid price of the ice which plaintiff had received. Erom that judgment plaintiff appeals.

For the appellant the cause was submitted on the brief of *McGee & Jeger.*

*O. E.*Arminfor the respondent.

*128
      *Br*the Court.

The finding of the court is not opposed by any clear preponderance of evidence. With that finding, substantially to the effect that plenty of ice could have been purchased at or less than the contract price nearer to plaintiff’s place of business, and that he made no reasonable effort to obtain it, he has failed to establish general damages in any amount. Whether there might, nevertheless, be actual damages in the way of disturbance of business before plaintiff could • obtain ice elsewhere when defendant unexpectedly failed to deliver it, or for expenses incurred in searching for ice, it is unnecessary to discuss. No evidence was offered of the amount of any such damages, even if it might be in-ferable that plaintiff had suffered them. Therefore no recovery.for more than nominal damages could be awarded him..

Judgment affirmed.
/e/T-e-o3 

H via SYRIAN `4""'" 

Control System 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

WASH I NGTON 

wii BYE-13463/69 

1111 

OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY 

$ 3 DEC 1363 

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. HANSEN 

GENERAL FERGUSON 

GENERAL MCNICKLE 

SUBJECT: Air Force Participation in NASA Study of MOL 

Acquisition and Tracking System 

For your information, a copy of a recent letter to 

Dr. Newell on the above subject is attached. Please 

take whatever action is necessary to satisfy Air Force 

interests in the study. 

Upon completion of the study, please let me have 

your recommendations as to further Air Force involvement. 

1 Atch 

a/s 

q. mr.,:r,!I rifF.711 

i 

t3ciitrel Systea 

BYE 13463-69 

Copy It of Copies 

Page 1 of 1 pages 

7/2 -23 00C 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

!lade via MAU 

rliitral System 

DEPARTMENTOFTHEA1R FORCE 

WASHINGTON 

OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY 

2 3 DEC 193 • 

Dear Dr. Newell: 

In my letter to you of November 17, 1969, I stated that 

the Air Force was examining the role it might assume in 

response to your invitation to participate in the. NASA study 

of the MOL Acquisition and Tracking System (ATS) as an 

experiment in the Apollo Applications Program (AAP). I am 

now in a position to be more explicit as to the details of 

that participation. 

The Air Force has a continuing high interest in the ATS 

and is enthusiastic about the possibility that it may be 

flown in AAP. The objectives that we had hoped to achieve 

in MOL using this equipment remain valid and we would hope 

that some if not many of them could be accomplished in the 

workshop. 

The general concept of limited Air Force participation 

in your study has been reviewed by Generals McNickle and 

Hedrick, DCS/R&D, and the Commander of the Systems Command, 

General Ferguson. As a consequence, it has been concluded 

that the working point of contact with your study manager 

will be at the Systems Command Headquarters level. 

Colonel Stanley C. White, who was the Assistant for 

Bio-Astronautics in the MOL Program, has been selected for 

this assignment. 

My people have been in frequent contact with Mr. Schneider 

and Mr. Culbertson of your organization and are, I believe, 

familiar with all of the pertinent details. 

BYE-13462,69 5 A 

cityn v.7 " biEWA_ r4 

BYE 13 2- 9 ]5;lifOi System "r Page 1 of 2 Pages flnt7-4 

Z:j1,,k;v1.1 

111 

Copy .5- of. 4 Copies 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 11:u 

Centrol System 

May I again thank you for your offer to participate 

and we will look forward to the results of, the study. 

Sincerely, 

Dr. Homer E. Newell 

Associate Administrator 

National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration 

Washington, D. C. 20546 

n-rr5iti 

en:Itrel System 

BYE 13162-69 

Page 2 of 2 pages 

Copy 5* of 4,Copies