alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1590 

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to provide protections against 

pregnancy discrimination in the workplace, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 17, 2015 

Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. KIRK, and 

Mr. GRASSLEY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to provide protections 

against pregnancy discrimination in the workplace, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pregnancy Discrimina5 tion Amendment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROTECTIONS AGAINST PREGNANCY DISCRIMINA7 TION IN THE WORKPLACE. 

8 Section 701(k) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 

9 U.S.C. 2000e(k)) is amended— 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1590 IS

1 (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘as other 

2 persons not so affected but similar in their ability’’ 

3 and inserting ‘‘as any other applicants for employ4 ment with, or employees employed by, the same em5 ployer, in work that is performed under similar 

6 working conditions, who are not so affected but simi7 lar in their temporary ability’’; and 

8 (2) by inserting after the first sentence the fol9 lowing: ‘‘This subsection shall not permit any labor 

10 organization, or agent of such labor organization, 

11 representing employees of an employer having em12 ployees subject to any provision of this title, directly 

13 or through any collective bargaining agreement 

14 (agreed to by the labor organization, or agent of 

15 such labor organization, and such employer), to 

16 cause or attempt to cause such employer to commit 

17 an unlawful employment practice against an em18 ployee in violation of this subsection.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|KPMG LLP
Chartered Accountants
PO Box 10426 777 Dunsmuir Street
Vancouver BC V7Y 1K3
Canada | Telephone (604) 691-3000
Telefax (604) 691-3031
www. kpmg.ca
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
Braintech, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-64872 and 333-92253) on Form S-8 of Braintech, Inc. of our report dated February 9, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Braintech, Inc. as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-KSB of Braintech, Inc. Our report dated February 9, 2004 contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has incurred recurring losses from operations and used cash in operating activities which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.



/s/ KPMG LLP

Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada
March 24, 2004









|KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership is the Canadian member
of KPMG International, a Swiss nonoperating association
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In connection with the Annual Report of CLP Power Hong Kong Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Betty S. M. Yuen, Managing Director of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |     |  |                     
|------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------
|Date: June 20, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Betty S. M. Yuen
|                    |  |     |  | Betty S. M. Yuen    
|                    |  |     |  | Managing Director
him -0-if

SPECIAL 11ANa maimunummSIAS

TOP-SEC-RE-T21 March 194

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. NERBERT F. YORK

Director of Defame Research & Engineering

SUBJECT: Satellite Recoanaissance Program

accordence with Executive direction, the Air Force is currattly oondneting certain sensitive satellite electronic reocumaissanee

efforts under the SAMOS development program. We are new extending

these efforts, and have formulated a program of national character

whereby this effort can encompass participation from the ktelligenee

Community, and can be planned in the context of associated activities

within the Community or within the Military Department.

Mr. Dailey at your staff has been informed in general terms of

this activity by a member of General Cumin's staff. R is my understanding that the various Intent/ewe organisations are prepared to

designate certain individuals as working level points of contact to

assist the Director, SAMOS Program, in *inning and executing this

effort.

A special briefing has been prepared to explain to selected persons

the objectives and specialised prooedmres incident to this program. I

have asked Lt Colonel Edwin J. Istvan, of General Curtis's (Moo' to

provide the briefing to you end Mr. Dailey in the near future.

I will keep you fully advised of the status of the program, and

the results obtained. I also wish to express appreciation for your assistance and cooperation in the furtherance of this effort.

Joseph V. Charyk

Under Secretary of the Mr Force

Cy .1 of 3 cys

1 Page

D-1114

SpEC. PIM P-1M nun
<PAGE>
 
                              GENSYM CORPORATION
                  EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


To Gensym Corporation:

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements (File Numbers: 333-03855, 333-03857, 333-03861,
333-03863 and 333-29707).


                                                       /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                                                       -----------------------
                                                           Arthur Andersen LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 25, 1999
# CE2004084EN.01050801.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/508 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/508

---

(2004/C 84 E/0585)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3512/03

by Konstantinos Hatzidakis (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(25 November 2003)

Subject:   Probable impact of the strike of employees at the National Statistical Service of Greece on the publication of European indicators

Subject:

The strike by employees of the National Statistical Service of Greece following the continuing refusal of the relevant minister to receive workers' representatives and engage in discussions with them is in its sixth week. As a result of the strike it is impossible to publish crucial statistical indicators on various sectors (the economy industrial production, culture, health, etc.), including indicators concerning inflation.

How long is it since Eurostat received statistics from the Greek National Statistical Service?

What impact is this delay — which is set to continue — having on the publication of European indicators by Eurostat?

Answer given by Mr Solbes Mira on behalf of the Commission

(8 January 2004)

(8 January 2004)

The strike by employees of the National Statistical Service of Greece (NSSG) appears to be of some impact on the ability of the Greek authorities to meet their Community statistical obligations.

For instance, some problems have occurred with regard to the timely delivery of current statistics. As an example, short-term business statistics have not been delivered since the start of the strike. Similar examples can be found in domains where the provision of statistical data is governed by gentlemen agreements. However, it is important to note that, as a whole, the effect on Union and Eurozone level data has been so far relatively small even if it is likely to imply a relative, but not substantial, fall in quality due to the need for estimates to be included for Greece.

The disruption of work might also have an impact which will continue after the end of the strike. For example, Eurostat has already been informed that Greece would probably be unable to respect the timetable for delivery of data for the 2003 Farm Structure Survey. Similar effects may be expected in other sectors.

Furthermore, working relations may have been disrupted by the absence of Greek delegates from working party and other meetings. The negotiations for a number of grants to NSSG have equally been disrupted which may be expected to have an indirect impact in the medium to long term on the ability of Greece to meet some of its statistical obligations.

The Commission takes note however, that the strike is terminated and this will certainly contribute to the resumption of normal cooperation of the NSSG with the Commission.

---
# C_2005143EN.01002803.xml

| 11.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/28

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für ZRS Wien by order of that court of 8 April 2005 in KVZ retec GmbH v Republic of Austria (Federal Minister for Agriculture, Forestry, the Environment and Water Management)

(Case C-176/05)

(2005/C 143/45)

Language of the case: German

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Landesgericht für ZRS Wien (Vienna Regional Civil Court) (Austria) of 8 April 2005, received at the Court Registry on 20 April 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between KVZ retec GmbH and Republic of Austria (Federal Minister for Agriculture, Forestry, the Environment and Water Management) on the following questions:

| 1. | Is the shipment (transit or return) of meat-and-bone meal, whether or not free of special risk material, subject, in so far as it involves waste, to the notification obligation in Council Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 (‘the Waste Shipment Regulation’)?
  If so, |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the shipment (transit or return) of meat-and-bone meal, whether or not free of special risk material, subject, in so far as it involves waste, to the notification obligation in Council Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 (‘the Waste Shipment Regulation’)?

If so,

| 2. | Is the shipment of meat-and-bone meal, whether or not free of special risk material, excluded from the application of the Waste Shipment Regulation in accordance with Article 1(2)(d) of that regulation?
  If the answer to Question 2 is in the negative, |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is the shipment of meat-and-bone meal, whether or not free of special risk material, excluded from the application of the Waste Shipment Regulation in accordance with Article 1(2)(d) of that regulation?

If the answer to Question 2 is in the negative,

| 3. | Is the shipment (transit or return) of meat-and-bone meal






  (a) | which is free of special risk material; or |
| --- | --- | --- |

3.

Is the shipment (transit or return) of meat-and-bone meal

(a)

which is free of special risk material; or

| (b) | which contains special risk material (classified as ‘Category 1’ material under the EC By-products Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002) |
| --- | --- |

(b)

which contains special risk material (classified as ‘Category 1’ material under the EC By-products Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002)

illegal under Article 26(1)(a) and (b) of the Waste Shipment Regulation, in the absence of notification to and the consent of the authorities concerned, waste on the ground that it involves within the meaning of the Waste Shipment Regulation?

---
Transformational Communications Office 

Formed

Sept. 3, 2002

Under Secretary of the Air Force and Director of the National Reconnaissance Office Peter B. 

Teets announced today the formation of the Transformational Communications Office to 

coordinate, synchronize and direct execution of the Transformational Communications 

Architecture. The Transformational Communications Architecture will be a joint effort with full 

involvement by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Command, Control, Communications and 

Intelligence and the Defense Information Systems Agency. "We are excited about this 

opportunity to form this National Security Space team to develop a Transformational 

Communications Architecture that will assure we have maximum compatibility to meet the 

growing communications requirements of our warfighters and the Intelligence Community," said 

Mr. Teets. "The success of this new architecture is going to be a team effort from across the 

military services, the Department of Defense, the Intelligence Community and NASA." 

RADM Rand Fisher, the head of the NRO Communications Directorate and Commander of the 

Navy SPAWAR Space Field Activity, was named the director of the office and Ms. Christine 

Anderson, the Director of the Milsatcom Joint Program Office at the Air Force's Space and 

Missile Systems Center, will be the deputy director. They will lead a small team joined by 

representatives from the Department of Defense, Intelligence Community and NASA. Both 

officials also retain their current positions.

The Transformational Communications Office will coordinate the acquisition execution of 

system elements of the Transformational Communications Architecture under existing program 

offices using established authorities and budgets. This allows the office to use best practices 

program management and contracting resources across a broad spectrum of organizations.

The Transformational Communications Office has support from across the military services, the 

Defense Information Systems Agency, the Intelligence Community and NASA. Although service 

and agency acquisition executives retain all existing authorities, they will involve the 

Transformational Communications Office in decisions and activities that affect the 

Transformational Communications Architecture.

"Our military operations in Afghanistan have once again highlighted the critical importance that 

communications brings to success on the battlefield," said Mr. Teets. "We believe there is an 

urgent need to deliver a Transformational Communications Architecture because 

communications connectivity and interoperability is an imperative. This new office is going to 

help make that communications transformation a reality."
Exhibit 32A

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AutoInfo, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harry Wachtel,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company. A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.


/s/ Harry Wachtel
-----------------
Harry Wachtel
Chief Executive Officer
August 10, 2005


                                       19
Exhibit 32B  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of AutoInfo, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on the date hereof (the Report), I, William Wunderlich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request. Date:
        May 14, 2008
 /s/ William Wunderlich William Wunderlich Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-2253

_____________________________

RENALDO LEON WINTERS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark Borello, Judge.

September 14, 2018

PER CURIAM.

Renaldo Leon Winters challenges the denial of his motion for 

postconviction relief. We affirm.

The trial court summarily denied the first seven grounds of 

his motion but granted an evidentiary hearing on the eighth and 

final ground. We affirm the summary denial of the initial seven 

grounds because Winters did not specify facts, unrebutted by the 

record, demonstrating entitlement to relief. See Rose v. State, 

617 So. 2d 291, 296 (Fla. 1993); see also Cortes v. State, 85 So. 3d 

1135, 1139 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). We note that in concluding 

Winters did not establish a basis for relief, this court consulted 

our own records, as we are permitted to do. See Loren v. State, 

601 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
2

As for the remaining ground, which alleged trial counsel was 

deficient in failing to advise Winters of the possibility of 

sentencing as a Prison Releasee Reoffender, we find no basis to 

overturn the trial court’s findings of fact and credibility 

determinations following an evidentiary hearing.

Accordingly, the order denying postconviction relief is 

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Victor Holder, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Amanda D. Stokes, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Exhibit 32.1Chief Executive Officer’s Certification required under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002In connection with the annual report of TIB Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theperiod ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”), I, Edward V. Lett, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifypursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that, to myknowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.     Date: August 3, 2005    /s/ Edward V. Lett         Edward V. Lett
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 33 (Thursday, February 19, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03339]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. Geological Survey

[GX.15.AE60.00C10.00.]


Notice of Intent To Grant an Exclusive License

AGENCY: U.S. Geological Survey, Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Notice of intent to grant an exclusive license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Geological Survey 
intends to grant to Alpha Mach, Inc., 101-2205 Bombardier, Ste-Julie, 
Qc, Canada, J3E 2J9, an exclusive license to practice the following: A 
device for monitoring subsurface temperatures.

DATES: Comments must be received fifteen (15) days from the effective 
date of this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin Henry, Technology Enterprise 
Specialist, Office of Policy & Analysis, U.S. Geological Survey, 12201 
Sunrise Valley Dr, MS 153, Reston, VA 20192, 703-648-4344.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: It is in the public interest to license this 
invention, as Alpha Mach, Inc., submitted a complete and sufficient 
application for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be 
royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 
U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be 
granted unless, within fifteen (15) days from the date of this 
published Notice, the U.S. Geological Survey Office of Policy & 
Analysis receives written evidence and argument which establishes that 
the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements 
of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Katherine McCulloch,
Deputy Associate Director for Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-03339 Filed 2-18-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4311-AM-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent 

 v. 

JOEL GAMBLE, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 58 MM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 12th day of May, 2015, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for 

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. Although counsel was negligent, 

Petitioner is entitled to a counsel-filed Petition for Allowance of Appeal. See

Pa.R.Crim.P. 122(B). Counsel is DIRECTED to file a Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

within 15 days.