alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Docket ID: FEMA-2015-0008; OMB No. 1660-0030]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

                    On February 9, 2015, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) published an agency information collection notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     at 80 FR 7005. In the                     **For Further Information Contact**                     section, FEMA inadvertently listed the email address for the Records Management Division as                     *FEMA-Information-Collections-anagement@fema.dhs.gov.*                     It should be                     *FEMA-Information-Collections-Management@fema.dhs.gov.*

Dated: February 11, 2015.

Charlene D. Myrthil,

Director, Records Management Division, Mission Support, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 2015-03368 Filed 2-17-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
C /GI 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 21-0569 

IN THE MATTER OF G.M.P., 

FILED 

MAR 2 5 2022 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

State of Montana 

An Alleged Incapacitated Person. O R D E R 

M. R. App. P. 10(6) requires that parties filing documents with the Clerk of the 

Supreme Court shall use initials for individual parties in a proceeding under Title 72, 

Chapter 5, Part 3 (Guardians of Incapacitated Persons). 

The Court has determined there are numerous references to the names of the 

Appellant and Appellee throughout Appellee's brief filed March 24, 2022. Thus, the brief 

does not comply with the referenced rule. 

Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that within ten (10) days of the date of this Order the Appellee 

shall electronically file with the Clerk of this Court a revised brief containing the revisions 

necessary to comply with the specified Rule and that the Appellee shall serve copies of the 

revised brief on all parties of record; and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained 

in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the revised brief. 

The Clerk of this Court is directed to mail a true copy of this Order to all counsel of 

record. 

DATED this 25th day of March, 2022. 

For the Court, 

Justice Jim Rice 

03/25/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0569
NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

14675 Lee Road

Chantilly, VA 20151-1715

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release #02-13

CONTACT: (703) 808-5050 February 25, 2013

NRO HONORS 2012 PIONEER AND FOUNDER 

Ms. Betty Sapp, Director of the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), selected

Dr. Robert P. O’Donnell as a Pioneer of National Reconnaissance for 2012, and honored

Mr. Jimmie D. Hill as an NRO Founder. Ms. Sapp inducted this year’s Pioneer honoree 

into Pioneer Hall in a ceremony on February 22, 2013, at NRO headquarters in 

Chantilly, Va. The Honorable James R. Clapper, Director of National Intelligence, was 

this year’s featured speaker.

The NRO honors as Pioneers those individuals who have made significant and lasting 

contributions to the discipline of national reconnaissance. Dr. O’Donnell pioneered the 

development of unique, complex precision structures and mechanisms that enabled 

dramatic breakthroughs in the ability to collect critically important signals and imagery 

intelligence from space. Dr. O’Donnell developed analysis and simulation techniques 

which made possible the precision pointing and flexible structure deployment and 

control of a new generation of collection satellites. His career in national 

reconnaissance spans from 1972 to the present.

Dr. O’Donnell performed critical work toward establishing the NRO’s reputation for 

engineering excellence, responsiveness, and technical innovation. With the addition of 

Dr. O’Donnell, the NRO will have selected a total of 86 pioneers over the past 12 years. 

Designation as a Pioneer of National Reconnaissance is the highest honor in the field. 

Commemorative plaques for each Pioneer are on permanent display in Pioneer Hall at 

NRO headquarters.
Director Sapp recognized Mr. Hill for laying the foundation for the 21st century NRO. His 

dynamic leadership fostered an innovative management and operational environment 

that allowed the NRO to successfully develop, execute, and sustain essential national 

reconnaissance programs. Mr. Hill’s direction and strong advocacy ensured the NRO 

successfully maintained its critical strategic importance, but also opened a new era of 

tactical relevance and adapted the NRO to its new, post-Cold War missions—

transitioning the organization from a geographically-dispersed, strategic reconnaissance 

enterprise to a unified, consolidated intelligence agency. 

Mr. Hill’s career in national reconnaissance spanned from 1965-1996.

-NRO-
EXHIBIT  99.2

# Certification
Of Chief Financial Officer Of Ocean Energy, Inc.Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As
Adopted Pursuant ToSection
906 Of The SarbanesOxley Act Of 2002

I,
William L. Transier, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Ocean Energy, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the
Companys quarterly report on Form 10Q for the period ended September 30,
2002 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2002
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Report) by the Company fully complies with the requirements of that
section.

I
further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| | \s\ William L. Transier       William L. Transier 
       Executive Vice President
       and Chief Financial Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 12,
2002
----

            COUNCIL DECISION         

of 12 June 2006         

appointing a German full member of the Committee of the Regions

(2006/408/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 263 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the German Government,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Volker HOFF, ‘Hessen Minister for Federal and European Affaires and Commissioner of the Land of Hessen to the Federation’, is hereby appointed a full member of the Committee of the Regions in place of Mr Jochen RIEBEL for the remainder of his term of office, which runs until 25 January 2010.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 12 June 2006.

For the Council

The President

U. PLASSNIK            

----

(1)OJ L 56, 25.2.2006, p. 75.

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-4613

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMMIE RAY PITTMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,

District Judge. (1:06-cr-00043-5)

Submitted: March 4, 2008 Decided: July 18, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert W. Adams, Hickory, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen

C. F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina;

Amy E. Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jammie Ray Pittman pled guilty pursuant to a plea

agreement to conspiracy to manufacture and possess methamphetamine

with the intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and

846 (2000). On appeal, Pittman argues the district court, having

stricken a two-level enhancement for obstruction of justice

recommended by the probation officer, erred by not further reducing

his sentencing range upon granting the Government’s motion for

downward departure. His brief claims without reference to the

record that “[h]e did not give up his right to appeal from a

Judgment which was entered based on a miscalculation in the

Presentence Report.” Because we find the appellate waiver that is

a provision of Pittman’s plea agreement was knowing and voluntary

and the issue raised by Pittman is within the scope of the waiver,

we dismiss the appeal.

Pittman’s plea agreement contains an appellate waiver

that expressly provides he “waives all such rights to contest the

conviction and/or the sentence except for: (1) claims of

ineffective assistance of counsel, and (2) prosecutorial

misconduct.” His appeal does not raise either of these issues.

When the government seeks to enforce a waiver of

appellate rights and the appellant does not claim the government

breached the plea agreement, this court will enforce the waiver if

the record establishes the defendant knowingly and voluntarily
*

Pittman does not assert on appeal that his appellate waiver

was invalid. 

- 3 -

agreed to waive the right to appeal, and the issue being appealed

is within the scope of the waiver. See United States v. Blick, 408

F.3d 162, 168-69 (4th Cir. 2005). The record reveals that Pittman

agreed to this waiver knowingly and voluntarily.* See United

States v. Wessells, 936 F.2d 165, 167-68 (4th Cir. 1991)

(explaining that generally, if a district court fully questions a

defendant regarding his waiver of appellate rights during the Fed.

R. Crim. P. 11 colloquy, the waiver is valid). 

Accordingly, we dismiss Pittman’s appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Michael J. McCann, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. (the“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section1350, that: 1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for theperiod covered by such Report.Dated: November 7, 2005         By:                   /s/ Michael J. McCann    Michael J. McCann    Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1445 

To improve the Microloan Program of the Small Business Administration. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2015 

Mrs. FISCHER (for herself and Ms. CANTWELL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business 

and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To improve the Microloan Program of the Small Business 

Administration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Microloan Act of 

5 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MICROLOAN PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7(m) of the Small Busi8 ness Act (15 U.S.C. 636(m)) is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (4)— 

10 (A) by striking subparagraph (E); and 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1445 IS

1 (B) by redesignating subparagraph (F) as 

2 subparagraph (E); and 

3 (2) in paragraph (7)— 

4 (A) by striking ‘‘PROGRAM’’ and all that 

5 follows through ‘‘Under the program author6 ized’’ and inserting ‘‘NUMBER OF PARTICI7 PANTS.—Under the program authorized’’; and 

8 (B) by striking subparagraph (B). 

9 (b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con10 gress that the Administrator of the Small Business Ad11 ministration should promote the Microloan Program under 

12 section 7(m) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

13 636(m)) to encourage entrepreneurs to use the program. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
NRO selects 2004 class of Pioneers

The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) has selected its Pioneer Class of 2004 – four people 

who made significant and lasting contributions to the discipline of national reconnaissance. The 

four selectees are Mr. Sam Araki, retired Air Force Lt. Col. Harvey Cohen, Mr. Robert 

Kaemmerer, and Mr. James McAnally.

The new pioneers will be honored in a ceremony at 2 p.m. Oct. 13 at NRO headquarters where 

plaques will be permanently displayed in their honor. The pioneers were selected by Under 

Secretary of the Air Force and NRO Director Peter Teets based on recommendations from a 

special selection board, and will join 57 pioneers selected over the past four years.

Mr. Araki pioneered at Lockheed Missiles and Space Company the development of the Agena 

spacecraft, the world’s first stabilized platform for space. His contributions resulted in a space 

platform that the NRO used during the 1960s for a majority of its space-based SIGINT and 

IMINT systems, most notably for the highly successful Corona system. His career in national 

reconnaissance spanned from 1958-2002.

Lt. Col. Cohen pioneered for Program A from 1964 to 1984 innovative NRO security practices 

and procedures that were instrumental in the success of Program A’s Cold War Space Systems. 

These innovative information safeguard procedures, and their associated policy framework, 

provided the essential security to protect sensitive reconnaissance technology. His career in 

national reconnaissance spanned from 1962-2000.

Mr. Kaemmerer pioneered at TRW the development of the most sophisticated family of 

intelligence satellite systems of the Cold War. His contributions continued to be reflected in 

nearly every facet of certain NRO geo-synchronous and highly-elliptical orbit systems developed 

during the early 21st Century. His career in national reconnaissance spanned from 1966 to the 

present.

Mr. McAnally pioneered at Martin Marietta development of a new satellite reconnaissance 

system capable of producing imagery essential for a wide range of operations. This system 

provided unique and critical intelligence information during the Cold War and into the Global 

War on Terrorism. His career in national reconnaissance spanned from 1976-1997.

News media wishing to attend the event must contact the NRO Office of Corporate 

Communications at (703) 808-1015 or (703) 808-1746 and must be at the NRO Visitor’s Center 

by 1:30 p.m. Oct. 13.
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT
C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N (C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2
, SU B P ART B

. SE0 4360A152
NO. 01

- 15 -00632- CV

NO. 01

- 15 -00633- CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

_____

IN RE B.D.

STATE’S DESIGNATION OF LEAD COUNSEL ON APPEAL

D EVON A NDERSON

District Attorney

Harris County, Texas

J ESSICA A. C AIRD

State Bar No. 24000608

Assistant District Attorney

Lead Counsel on Appeal

1201 Franklin, Suite 600

Houston, Texas 77002

(713)755-5826

(713)755-5809 (fax)

caird_jessica@dao.hctx.net ACCEPTED

01-15-00632-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

7/27/2015 11:11:41 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERKTO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW THE STATE OF TEXAS, by and through the

undersigned assistant district attorney, and, pursuant to Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 6.1, hereby designates Jessica A. Caird , an assistant

district attorney who has been assigned this case by the Appellate Division

of the Harris County District Attorney’s Office and whose relevant contact

information required by said rule appears below, as lead counsel for the

State in the foregoing styled an d numbered appeal. The State further

requests that henceforth all notices or other communications about the case

be directed to her at the address below, and that her name appear as lead

counsel for the State in connection with all opinions, orders, or oth er

documents in the case that this Court releases to any law

- related publishing

companies or their representatives for publication.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ 

## Jessica A. Caird

J ESSICA A. C AIRD

Assistant District Attorney

Lead Counsel on Appeal

State Bar No. 24000608

1201 Franklin, Suite 600

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 755

- 5826

(713) 274

- 5958 (alternate)

caird_jessica @dao.hctx.net2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that I have requested that efile.txcourts.gov electronically

serve a copy of this motion to:

Gary M. Polland at

p ollandlaw@yahoo.com

/s/ 

## Jessica A. Caird

Jessica A. Caird

Assistant District Attorney

Harris County, Texas

1201 Franklin, Suite 600

Houston, Texas 77002

- 1923

( 713) 755

- 5826 (but soon to

change to (713) 274

- 5958)

caird_jessica@dao.hctx.net

TBC No. 24000608

Date: July 27, 2015
#### JAMES RUNYON *vs.*PINKNEY ANDERSON.

June 1843

Where pleadings are not filed, no judgment will be entered in this court, (a.)

(a.) NOTE BY THE REPORTER.

It is the invariable rule of the Supreme Court to enter no judgment at law until the pleadings have been filed; and no decree in Equity, until the draft of the decree has been made by counsel and submitted to the Court.

This appeal was brought up by the plaintiff from Yancy county, to December Term 1841. No pleadings were sent , up with the case, and notice having been given to the parties to file their pleadings, and none being filed, it was ordered by the court at this term that the judgment be arrested.
EXHIBIT 13.1





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


CEO CERTIFICATION





In connection with the annual report of Almaden Minerals Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Morgan Poliquin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ “Morgan Poliquin”Name: Morgan PoliquinTitle: Chief Executive OfficerMarch 30, 2012
#### Kersten, Appellant, vs. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company, Respondent.

For the appellant: *A. M. Andrews*of Shawano.

For the respondent: *J. F. Baker*and *Llewellyn Cole*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                          12,333 
<SECURITIES>                                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  159,122 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0 
<INVENTORY>                                          0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               625,708 
<PP&E>                                       1,816,730 
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (32,333)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,417,822 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          782,027 
<BONDS>                                              0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<COMMON>                                        12,312 
<OTHER-SE>                                     984,607 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,417,822 
<SALES>                                         84,612 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               153,673 
<CGS>                                           48,154 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,154 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,904,732 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,614,726)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,614,726)
<DISCONTINUED>                              (2,507,668)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,122,394)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.13)
                                               

</TABLE>
# Privacy Act of 1974

FOIA
current page

## About Privacy Act (PA) - Definition of the Privacy Act

The Privacy Act (PA) protects an individual's privacy by putting controls on federal agencies in the collection, use, maintenance, and dissemination of personal information. In addition, it entitles individuals to access federal agency records or to request an amendment to records that are maintained in a file retrievable by an individual's name or personal identifier, except to the extent that the information is exempt from release. Individual, in the context of the Privacy Act, is defined as a U.S. citizen or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence.

The Privacy Act also requires that agency records be accurate, relevant, timely, and complete, and amendments are limited to these criteria. however, amendments are normally restricted to correcting factual errors and not matters of official judgments, such as performance ratings, or subjective judgments that reflect an individual's observation, evaluation, or opinion.
          - Submit a PA Request
          - Exemptions
          - How to Appeal