9434 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 35 / Monday, February 23, 2015 / Notices 

1The Regulations are currently codified in the 

Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730– 

774 (2014). The Regulations issued pursuant to the 

Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. app. 2401– 

2420 (2000)) (‘‘EAA’’). Since August 21, 2001, the 

EAA has been in lapse and the President, through 

Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR 

2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended 

by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent 

being that of August 7, 2014 (79 FR 46959 (August 

11, 2014)), has continued the Regulations in effect 

under the International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq. (2006 & Supp. 

IV 2010)). 

international organizations rely on these 

statistic-based tools, as do American 

businesses, state and local governments, 

and news organizations. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households: International travelers 

departing the United States 18 years or 

older which includes U.S. and non-U.S. 

residents for all countries except 

Canada. 

Frequency: Monthly. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. 

This information collection request 

may be viewed at reginfo.gov. Follow 

the instructions to view Department of 

Commerce collections currently under 

review by OMB. 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to OIRA_Submission@

omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806. 

Dated: February 18, 2015. 

Glenna Mickelson, 

Management Analyst, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2015–03550 Filed 2–20–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[B–8–2015] 

Foreign-Trade Zone 72—Indianapolis, 

Indiana; Expansion of Subzone 72B; 

Eli Lilly and Company; Plainfield, 

Indiana 

An application has been submitted to 

the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board by 

the Indianapolis Airport Authority, 

grantee of FTZ 72, requesting an 

expansion of Subzone 72B on behalf of 

Eli Lilly and Company (Eli Lilly) to 

include a site in Plainfield, Indiana. The 

application was submitted pursuant to 

the provisions of the Foreign-Trade 

Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a– 

81u), and the regulations of the FTZ 

Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally 

docketed on February 13, 2015. 

Subzone 72B was approved on July 

26, 1985 (Board Order 309, 50 FR 3l404, 

8–2–1985), and expanded on April 15, 

2002 (Board Order 1222, 67 FR 20086, 

4–24–2002). The subzone currently 

consists of two sites: Site 1 (359 acres)— 

five parcels in the Indianapolis area, 

Marion County; and, Site 3 (751 acres)— 

State Road 63, Clinton, Vermillion 

County. 

The current request would add a site 

(34 acres) located at 2222 Stanley Road 

in Plainfield, Hendricks County, to the 

subzone. No additional authorization for 

production activity has been requested 

at this time. 

In accordance with the FTZ Board’s 

regulations, Elizabeth Whiteman of the 

FTZ Staff is designated examiner to 

review the application and make 

recommendations to the FTZ Board. 

Public comment is invited from 

interested parties. Submissions shall be 

addressed to the FTZ Board’s Executive 

Secretary at the address below. The 

closing period for their receipt is April 

6, 2015. Rebuttal comments in response 

to material submitted during the 

foregoing period may be submitted 

during the subsequent 15-day period to 

April 20, 2015. 

A copy of the application will be 

available for public inspection at the 

Office of the Executive Secretary, 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 

21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 

1401 Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the 

‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the FTZ 

Board’s Web site, which is accessible 

via www.trade.gov/ftz. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elizabeth Whiteman at 

Elizabeth.Whiteman@trade.gov or (202) 

482–0473. 

Dated: February 13, 2015. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2015–03614 Filed 2–20–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

Order Denying Export Privileges 

In the Matter of: 

Ernesto Salgado-Guzman; Inmate Number— 

68370–097; Willacy County; Correctional 

Institution; 1800 Industrial Drive; 

Raymondville, TX 78580 

and with an address at: 

16738 Harper Blvd.; Madera, CA 93638 

On May 5, 2014, in the U.S. District 

Court, Eastern District of California, 

Ernesto Salgado-Guzman (‘‘SalgadoGuzman’’), was convicted of violating 

Section 38 of the Arms Export Control 

Act (22 U.S.C. 2778 (2012)) (‘‘AECA’’). 

Specifically, Salgado-Guzman 

knowingly and willfully exported and 

caused to be exported and attempted to 

export and attempted to cause to be 

exported from the United States to 

Mexico caliber rifles, defense articles 

which were on the United States 

Munitions List, without having first 

obtained from the Department of State a 

license for such export or written 

authorization for such export. SalgadoGuzman was sentenced to 46 months 

imprisonment, 36 months of supervised 

release and a $100 assessment. 

Section 766.25 of the Export 

Administration Regulations (‘‘EAR’’ or 

‘‘Regulations’’) 1 provides, in pertinent 

part, that ‘‘[t]he Director of the Office of 

Exporter Services, in consultation with 

the Director of the Office of Export 

Enforcement, may deny the export 

privileges of any person who has been 

convicted of a violation of the Export 

Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’), the EAR, 

or any order, license or authorization 

issued thereunder; any regulation, 

license, or order issued under the 

International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706); 18 

U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of 

the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50 

U.S.C. 83(b)), or section 38 of the Arms 

Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).’’ 15 

CFR 766.25(a); see also Section 11(h) of 

the EAA, 50 U.S.C. app. 2410(h). The 

denial of export privileges under this 

provision may be for a period of up to 

10 years from the date of the conviction. 

15 CFR 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C. 

app. 2410(h). In addition, Section 750.8 

of the Regulations states that the Bureau 

of Industry and Security’s Office of 

Exporter Services may revoke any 

Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’) 

licenses previously issued in which the 

person had an interest in at the time of 

his conviction. 

BIS has received notice of SalgadoGuzman’s conviction for violating the 

AECA, and have provided notice and an 

opportunity for Salgado-Guzman to 

make a written submission to BIS, as 

provided in Section 766.25 of the 

Regulations. BIS has received and 

reviewed a submission from SalgadoGuzman. 

Based upon my review and 

consultations with BIS’s Office of 

Export Enforcement, including its 

Director, and the facts available to BIS, 

I have decided to deny SalgadoGuzman’s export privileges under the 

Regulations for a period of 10 years from 

the date of Salgado-Guzman’s 

conviction. I have also decided to 

revoke all licenses issued pursuant to 

the Act or Regulations in which 


Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 35 / Monday, February 23, 2015 / Notices 9435 

1See Uncovered Innerspring Units from the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of Antidumping 

Duty Order, 74 FR 7661 (February 19, 2009). 

2See Request for Antidumping Administrative 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on 

Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People’s 

Republic of China, dated February 28, 2014. 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and 

Request for Revocation in Part, 79 FR 18262, 18272 

(April 1, 2014) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). 

4Comfort Coil and Creative Furniture are both 

located in market economy countries. As a result, 

the Department is examining each company’s 

respective PRC exports of subject merchandise for 

this administrative review. 

Salgado-Guzman had an interest at the 

time of his conviction. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered: 

First, from the date of this Order until 

May 5, 2024, Ernesto Salgado-Guzman, 

with last known addresses of Inmate 

Number—68370–097, Willacy County, 

Correctional Institution, 1800 Industrial 

Drive, Raymondville, TX 78580 and 

16738 Harper Blvd., Madera, CA 93638, 

and when acting for or on his behalf, his 

successors, assigns, employees, agents 

or representatives (the ‘‘Denied 

Person’’), may not, directly or indirectly, 

participate in any way in any 

transaction involving any commodity, 

software or technology (hereinafter 

collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) 

exported or to be exported from the 

United States that is subject to the 

Regulations, including, but not limited 

to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, License Exception, or 

export control document; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the Regulations, or in any 

other activity subject to the Regulations; 

or 

C. Benefitting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

that is subject to the Regulations, or in 

any other activity subject to the 

Regulations. 

Second, no person may, directly or 

indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf 

of the Denied Person any item subject to 

the Regulations; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

the Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession, or control of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States, including financing or other 

support activities related to a 

transaction whereby the Denied Person 

acquires or attempts to acquire such 

ownership, possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from the Denied Person of 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been exported from the United 

States; 

D. Obtain from the Denied Person in 

the United States any item subject to the 

Regulations with knowledge or reason 

to know that the item will be, or is 

intended to be, exported from the 

United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Denied 

Person, or service any item, of whatever 

origin, that is owned, possessed or 

controlled by the Denied Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States. For purposes of this paragraph, 

servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification or 

testing. 

Third, after notice and opportunity for 

comment as provided in Section 766.23 

of the Regulations, any other person, 

firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to Salgado-Guzman 

by ownership, control, position of 

responsibility, affiliation, or other 

connection in the conduct of trade or 

business may also be made subject to 

the provisions of this Order in order to 

prevent evasion of this Order. 

Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of 

the Regulations, Salgado-Guzman may 

file an appeal of this Order with the 

Under Secretary of Commerce for 

Industry and Security. The appeal must 

be filed within 45 days from the date of 

this Order and must comply with the 

provisions of Part 756 of the 

Regulations. 

Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be 

delivered to the Salgado-Guzman. This 

Order shall be published in the Federal 

Register. 

Sixth, this Order is effective 

immediately and shall remain in effect 

until May 5, 2024. 

Issued this 12th day of February, 2015. 

Thomas Andrukonis, 

Acting Director, Office of Exporter Services. 

[FR Doc. 2015–03590 Filed 2–20–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–928] 

Uncovered Innerspring Units From the 

People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2013– 

2014 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘the Department’’) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on uncovered 

innerspring units (‘‘innerspring units’’) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(‘‘PRC’’). The period of review is 

February 1, 2013, through January 31, 

2014. The review covers two exporters 

of subject merchandise: Comfort Coil 

Technology Sdn Bhd (‘‘Comfort Coil’’) 

and Creative Furniture & Bedding 

Manufacturing (‘‘Creative Furniture’’). 

The Department preliminarily 

determines that Comfort Coil had no 

shipments of subject merchandise 

during the POR. The Department also 

preliminarily determines that Creative 

Furniture did not cooperate to the best 

of its ability and is, therefore, applying 

adverse facts available (‘‘AFA’’) to 

Creative Furniture’s PRC-origin 

merchandise. Interested parties are 

invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan Pulongbarit, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–4031. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 19, 2009, the Department 

published in the Federal Register notice 

of an antidumping duty order on 

innerspring units from the PRC (‘‘the 

Order’’).1 On February 28, 2014, Leggett 

& Platt, Inc. (‘‘Petitioner’’) submitted a 

request for the Department to conduct 

an administrative review of the Order 

that examines Comfort Coil’s and 

Creative Furniture’s exports of subject 

merchandise made during the POR.2 On 

April 1, 2014, the Department published 

in the Federal Register a notice of 

initiation of this administrative review 

of the Order concerning Comfort Coil’s 

and Creative Furniture’s POR exports of 

subject merchandise.3 4

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is uncovered innerspring units 


Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES