alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NANDI( ow -T9P3ECRE1- BYEMAN

-4Sf NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR 16 October 1972

••••nn••• ••n•nnn••••

MEMORANDUM FOR THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

(INTELLIGENCE)

SUBJECT: Tactical ELINT

REFERENCE: Your Memorandum of 6 October 1972

It .has become increasingly clear in recent years that

satellite systems have a role to play in the collection of

tactical ELINT for ocean and battlefield surveillance. With

this in mind, about one year ago, I asked the NRO Analysis

Office to conduct a study of the contribution which ELINT

satellites might make in supplying tactical intelligence to

the national authorities as well as tactical commanders.

This study was undertaken in collaboration with the DIA,

with the participation of the NSA and the military services,

and supported by the NRO Program Offices A and C and extensive

Aerospace Corporation effort.

It was realized from the outset that a proper study should

examine the trade-offs between conventional and overhead

collectors, and such_follow-oninvestigation was contemplated

as a primary DIA responsibility.

The NRO study referred to above was completed in July 1972

and copies were forwarded to your office, Volume I on 11 August

and Volume II on 19 September.---Our study examined in some

detail the battlefield and ocean surveillance capabilities not

only of current satellites, both low earth orbiters and high

altitude vehicles, but advanced versions as well. While

additional studies can always uncover areas for further work,

I wonder whether an immediate re-examination of the same

problem so soon after the completion of our own investigation

is really justified.

CLASSIFIED BY BYEMAN-1. 'EXEMPTFROM GENERAL DECLASSI tte

FICATION SCHEDULE OF EXECUTIVE ORDER 11652. EXEMPTIO

CATEGORY 5B(2). DECLASSIFY ON: IMP DET.

EMMA 111/1 BYEMAN comma IICIAISIM PION •41:041•14 1111141Mmiba

BYE13163-72 1 z

11,1111011411 sax se 11011S*01 *PK.
••n44. I ..4

-TOP-SECRET.- BYEMAN

CONNO...1111TIM

I will be happy to hear the report of George Steeg's

visit. After that, .I believe we can usefully discuss what

further studies he has in mind. Perhaps the interplay of

satellite and conventional systems should be examined by

your office rather than by DIA.

1111111111111111

DISTRIBUTION

—SAFSS A i I

I Dr Waxes

ti II ss. I

r

SS 3 L.

;

SS-5 I

55-7 ( 1

ss. 6 L 1/

COMP

SS-I If

10-2/RF

FILE

Im•mliti via

BYEMAN

MN%

COMM 1110 BYE 13163-

TOP-SECRET- . COP1'...1......................LCOPIES

!SCUMS MOO Adr0414t.0 11(111141101:. ►41111..a..........0,.......2„_...P4OCS

Si mesterma 11416 IS 110lb Me •.0tV
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1356 

To clarify that certain provisions of the Border Patrol Agent Pay Reform 

Act of 2014 will not take effect until after the Director of the Office 

of Personnel Management promulgates and makes effective regulations 

relating to such provisions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 14, 2015 

Mr. JOHNSON (for himself, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. TESTER, and Mr. CARPER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered, read the 

third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To clarify that certain provisions of the Border Patrol Agent 

Pay Reform Act of 2014 will not take effect until after 

the Director of the Office of Personnel Management promulgates and makes effective regulations relating to such 

provisions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EFFECTIVE DATES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2 of the Border Patrol 

5 Agent Pay Reform Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–277) is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1356 CPS

1 ‘‘(i) EFFECTIVE DATES.—Subsections (b), (c), (d), 

2 and (g), and the amendments made by such subsections, 

3 shall take effect on the first day of the first pay period 

4 beginning on or after January 1, 2016, except that— 

5 ‘‘(1) any provision in section 5550(b) of title 5, 

6 United States Code, as added by subsection (b), re7 lating to administering elections and making ad8 vance assignments to a regular tour of duty, shall be 

9 applicable before such effective date to the extent de10 termined necessary by the Director of the Office of 

11 Personnel Management; and 

12 ‘‘(2) the Director of the Office of Personnel 

13 Management may issue such regulations as may be 

14 necessary before such effective date.’’. 

15 (b) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION.—The amendment 

16 made by subsection (a) shall be deemed to have been en17 acted on the date of the enactment of the Border Patrol 

18 Agent Pay Reform Act of 2014. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

E. W., :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 1312 C.D. 2018

: Department of Human Services, : Respondent : CASE SEALED

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 4 th day of October , 2019, the opinion and order filed

in this matter on October 2, 2019, is hereby WITHDRAWN. The Court will file a

new opinion and order in due course

.

_____________________________________ BONNIE BRIGANCE LEADBETTER,

Senior Judge
#### Zohrlaut, Respondent, vs. Mengelberg, Appellant.

*December 8, 1911*

March *12, 1912.*

*Affirmance on equal division of court.*

Appeal from orders of tbe circuit court for Milwaukee county: WaeeeN D. Taeraitt, Circuit Judge. *Affirmed.*

For tbe appellant there were briefs by *Flanders, Boitum, Fawsett & Bottum,*and oral argument by *J. G. Flanders*and *G. F. Fawsett.*

*■*For tbe respondent there was a brief by *Lines, Spooner, Filis <& Quarles*and *Glichsnum, Gold & Corrigan,*and oral argument by *Geo. Lines*and *W. L. Gold.*

Tbe following opinion was filed January 9, 1912:

Kerwin, J.

This is an appeal from two orders of tbe circuit court for Milwaukee county, one overruling a demurrer to tbe respondent’s complaint, and tbe other granting tbe motion of respondent for an in junctional order restraining appellant from taking any steps to collect tbe judgment referred to in tbe complaint until tbe determination of tbe action.

Justice TimliN having been of counsel in tbe case did not sit. Tbe other members of tbe court are equally divided. Chief Justice WiNslow, Justices BaeNes and ViNJE are in favor of reversal, while Justices Siebeokee, Maeshall, and tbe writer are in favor of affirmance. This situation necessarily results in affirmance of tbe orders appealed from.

*By the Court.*— Tbe orders appealed from are affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied March 12, 1912.
Exhibit 32B

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AutoInfo, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
Wunderlich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.

/s/ William Wunderlich
----------------------
William Wunderlich
Chief Financial Officer
August 1, 2006
NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

UNITED STATES SPACE COMMAND

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Sept. 13, 2019

NRO, USSPACECOM exercise the protection and defense of space assets

Maxwell AFB, Ala. – The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) in collaboration with the newly reestablished U.S. Space Command (USSPACECOM) concluded its participation in the 13th Air Force Space 

Command Schriever Wargame today, at Maxwell Air Force Base, Montgomery, Alabama.

The two-week long wargame demonstrated how NRO, USSPACECOM, and the broader space community 

will work together to protect, defend, and operate the Nation’s space systems and those of our allies 

and partners.

“As adversaries increasingly threaten U.S. freedom of action in space, U.S. Space Command is a critical 

partner for the NRO,” said Dr. Christopher Scolese, Director of the NRO. “Space Command’s mission to 

protect and defend all U.S. satellites will enhance the survivability of NRO intelligence collection 

satellites and enable continuation of the national intelligence mission deep into conflict. Exercises like 

the Schriever Wargames provide us an opportunity to test and improve our joint planning process and 

shared defensive action ‘playbook’ to preserve assured access to space.”

“The Schriever Wargame provides an opportunity for us to exercise our jointly developed space protect 

and defend CONOPS,” said Gen Jay Raymond, Commander, USSPACECOM and Commander, Air Force 

Space Command. “Recently we’ve reached an agreement with the NRO that, when a threat is imminent, 

the NRO will execute direction from U.S. Space Command to take protective and defensive actions to 

safeguard their space assets.”

The ultimate purpose of this new agreement is to achieve unified action across the continuum of 

conflict. Although this agreement does not constitute a formal command relationship nor does it 

transfer satellite control authority, it signifies the strong partnership between the NRO and U.S. Space 

Command. 

The mission of the NRO is to deliver innovative intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities 

and data to National policymakers, the Intelligence Community and warfighters. 

The USSPACECOM mission is to deter aggression and conflict, defend U.S. and allied freedom of action, 

deliver space combat power for the Joint/Combined force, and develop joint warfighters to advance U.S. 

and allied interests in, from, and through the space domain.

--30--

NRO Public Affairs USSPACECOM Public Affairs

(703) 808-5050 (719) 554-3731

mediarelations@nro.mil USSPACECOM.PA.MEDIA@us.af.mil
Exhibit 13.2

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of SK Telecom Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: April 30, 2013 |  | /s/ Soo Cheol Hwang    
|                      |  | Soo Cheol Hwang        
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The Honorable Warren K. Urbom, United States District Judge for the District 1

of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-2210

___________

Robert Miller Pope, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * District of Nebraska. 

United States of America, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. * 

___________

 Submitted: December 14, 1998

 Filed: December 30, 1998

___________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

After a jury found Robert Miller Pope guilty of conspiring to distribute

marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and of money laundering, in violation of

18 U.S.C. § 1956, we affirmed his convictions and sentence on direct appeal. See

United States v. Pope, 989 F.2d 506 (8th Cir. Mar. 11, 1993) (unpublished per curiam).

Pope then filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion raising five claims for relief, all of which

were rejected by the district court following a hearing. In this appeal from the denial 1

of his
-2-

motion, the only issue before us is whether Pope&s counsel was ineffective for failing

to properly present at sentencing evidence of Pope&s allegedly minor role in the

offense, as grounds for a two-level reduction under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines

Manual § 3B1.2(b) (1997). We affirm.

We conclude Pope&s ineffective-assistance claim fails. After specifically

considering the evidence Pope contends counsel should have offered at sentencing, the

district court reaffirmed its prior conclusion that Pope was not entitled to the role

reduction, see Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984) (movant must show

both deficient performance and resulting prejudice), noting that Pope&s involvement

in the conspiracy was substantial, even if shorter in duration than that of other coconspirators, see United States v. Jones, 145 F.3d 959, 963 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 67

U.S.L.W. 3322 (U.S. Nov. 9, 1998) (No. 98-6369); cf. United States v. Snoddy, 139

F.3d 1224, 1228 (8th Cir. 1998).

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Phibro-Tech Process Diagram

Process is proprietary. Diagram is a best estimate

Aqueous

solution of PMN

Substance in

shipping

container.

Copper Chemicals

Storage tank

A
|
|

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND
  (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OFTITLE 18, UNITED STATES
  CODE)

Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Check Point Software Technologies
Ltd., an Israeli corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to the best of such
officers knowledge, information and belief, that

The
  Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Form
  20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained
  in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
  and results of operations of the Company.

|                             |                          
|---------------------------- | -------------------------
|Date:  
      March 29, 2004 | By:   /s/
      Gil Shwed
|                             |                          
|                             |                          
|                             |                          

| |                     
| | --------------------
| |                     
| | By:   /s/Eyal Desheh
| |                     
| |                     
| |                     
| |                     

---

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         257,017
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               27,517,652
<ALLOWANCES>                                   609,000
<INVENTORY>                                 29,564,046
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            58,864,329
<PP&E>                                      65,705,183
<DEPRECIATION>                              24,328,414
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             102,211,298
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,987,366
<BONDS>                                     27,570,076
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,313,796
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               102,211,298
<SALES>                                    193,772,362
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           193,772,362
<CGS>                                      161,384,854
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              161,384,854
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            19,687,176
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,414,410
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,285,922
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,129,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,156,922
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,156,922
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.55


</TABLE>
#### Anonymous.

This was a bill to foreclose a mortgage. *Cochran*was mortgagor — he sold one. moiety of the premises to *Huitt,*and his partner, in fee — their title came by a Sheriff’s sale to *Spiller.*The mortgagee had a decree of foreclosure, unless before a certain day the money was paid.— That day was past, but no absolute decree of foreclosure yet entered. *Spiller*moved to be made a party, and to have the decree so altered, that he might be at liberty to pay the money for saving his equity of redemption.

*Per curiam*

Let *Mr. Spiller*be at liberty to file a bill, stating his interest, and praying the decree may be so varied as to let him in to pay the money. It would be unjust. to foreclose the equity of redemption, and bar his title to his moiety, which he acquired fairly, without put* ting it in his power to prevent the foreclosure by paying the money.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


The Board of Directors
netGuru, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
333-111017, 333-29747, 333-72095 and 333-84184) on Form S-8 and in the
Registration Statements (Nos. 333-124920, 333-112181, 333-109517, 333-100651,
333-40564, and 333-84940) on Form S-3 of netGuru, Inc. of our report dated July
12, 2005, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of netGuru, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statement of
operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive loss and cash flows for the
year ended March 31, 2005, which report appears in the March 31, 2005 annual
report on Form 10-KSB of netGuru, Inc.


                                                         /s/ Haskell & White LLP
Irvine, California
July 12, 2005
EET
# C_2005045EN.01002201.xml

| 19.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/22

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 14 December 2004

in Case T-317/02: Fédération des industries condimentaires de France (FICF), Confédération générale des producteurs de lait de brebis and des industriels de Roquefort, Comité économique agricole régional ‘fruits et légumes de la région Bretagne’ (Cerafel) and Comité national interprofessionnel des palmipèdes à foie gras (CIFOG) v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Common commercial policy - World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Regulation (EC) No 3286/94 - Obstacles to trade - Prepared mustard - Termination of the examination procedure in relation to obstacles to trade - Community interest)

(2005/C 45/49)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-317/02, Fédération des industries condimentaires de France (FICF), established in Paris (France), Confédération générale des producteurs de lait de brebis and des industriels de Roquefort, established in Millau (France), Comité économique agricole régional ‘fruits and légumes de la région Bretagne’ (Cerafel), established in Morlaix (France), Comité national interprofessionnel des palmipèdes à foie gras (CIFOG), established in Paris (France), represented by O. Prost and M.-J. Jacquot, lawyers, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: P-J. Kuijper and G. Boudot, with an address for service in Luxembourg) – action for annulment of Commission Decision 2002/604/EC of 9 July 2002 terminating the examination procedures concerning obstacles to trade within the meaning of Council Regulation (EC) No 3286/94, consisting of trade practices maintained by the United States of America in relation to imports of prepared mustard (OJ 2002 L 195, p. 72) – the Court of First Instance (First Chamber, Extended Composition), composed of B. Vesterdorf, President, P. Mengozzi, M. E. Martins Ribeiro, F. Dehousse and I. Labucka, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, gave a judgment on 14 December 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders the applicants to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicants to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 323 of 21.12.2002.

1

---
NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

14675 Lee Road

Chantilly, VA 20151-1715

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release #04-12

Contact: (703) 808-5050 April 2, 2012

Dr. Troy Meink and Larry D. Bell Receive Charyk Award from National 

Space Club

The National Reconnaissance Office’s (NRO) Dr. Troy Meink, Director, Signals 

Intelligence Systems Acquisition and Larry D. Bell, Director, Space Systems Program 

Office received the Dr. Joseph V. Charyk Award at the National Space Club’s 55th 

Annual Robert H. Goddard Memorial Dinner on March 30, 2012. 

Dr. Meink and Mr. Bell received the award in recognition of their exceptional leadership 

while leading the NRO to deliver overhead Signals Intelligence capabilities in support of 

the nation's Intelligence Community and war fighting forces. 

Upon receiving the Charyk award Dr. Meink said, “It is an honor to be recognized by my 

peers in the space industry and an even bigger honor to share this award with my NRO 

colleague, Larry Bell, who, along with our staff, helped make the NRO vision a reality.” 

Mr. Bell remarked, “This award truly belongs to the men and women of the Space 

Systems Program Office who work each day to ensure the security of our nation.” 

The NRO is a joint Department of Defense-Intelligence Community organization 

responsible for developing, launching, and operating America’s signals, imagery, and 

communications satellites to meet the needs of our nation. 

-NRO-
S. 1362 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen 

An Act 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to clarify waiver authority regarding 

programs of all-inclusive care for the elderly (PACE programs). 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY REGARDING PACE 

PROGRAMS. 

Subsection (d)(1) of section 1115A of the Social Security Act 

(42 U.S.C. 1315a) is amended by striking ‘‘and 1903(m)(2)(A)(iii)’’ 

and inserting ‘‘1903(m)(2)(A)(iii), and 1934 (other than subsections 

(b)(1)(A) and (c)(5) of such section)’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.