alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004088EN.01014401.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/144 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/144

---

(2004/C 88 E/0152)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3402/03

by Anna Karamanou (PSE) to the Commission

(11 November 2003)

Subject:   ‘Cross amputation’ of sixteen-year-old in Sudan

Subject:

A recent Amnesty International bulletin reports that a court in Sudan has imposed a sentence of ‘cross amputation’ (i.e. amputation of the right hand and the left foot) on a sixteen-year-old suspected of armed assault. If this judgment is upheld, it will be carried out forthwith.

The punishment of amputation is in essence torture and a brutal violation of human rights, while Sudan has ratified numerous conventions protecting human rights and condemning torture. Such sentences are not uncommon in a country in which the judicial system and the penal code have also incorporated provisions of Islamic law (Sharia).

What steps will the Commission take to exert pressure on the Sudanese Government to suspend the judgment concerned and abolish torture so that Sudan complies with the conventions on the protection of human rights to which that country is a signatory?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(10 December 2003)

(10 December 2003)

The application of corporal punishment has been subject to repeated interventions with the Government of Sudan, in the framework of the EU-Sudan political dialogue, which includes human rights as one of the main components. The reaction of the Government in Khartoum has usually been elusive, pointing out that Sharia is and will be the legal basis in Sudan. This has also been confirmed, at least for the northern and central part of the country, in the Machakos Protocol of July 2002, an important milestone in the peace process, which the Union generally supports.

The Commission will ask its Delegation in Khartoum to inquire about the circumstances and details of the case referred to by Amnesty International, and bring the case to the attention of the Union Troika with a view to raising it during the forthcoming high-level mission to Khartoum in December 2003.

---
Promissory Note-Joseph Hines, dated December 31, 2007



 Exhibit 10.5 
 PROMISSORY NOTE 
 Spheric Technologies, Inc. agrees to pay to Joseph Hines the amount of $55.000.00
upon demand after March 31, 2008 for value received with no interest noted. This amount has been created by funding loans to Spheric Technologies as a Founder in the 2nd and 3rd quarters of calendar year 2007 — please see the attached
schedule. This liability is to be paid in US dollars or equivalent and should be considered a general obligation of the Company. 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Michael Kirksey

		 	Michael Kirksey
	Its:	 	Vice President


 Date: December 31, 2007
# CE2004078EN.01028301.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/283 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/283

---

(2004/C 78 E/0283)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3434/03

by Stavros Xarchakos (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(20 November 2003)

Subject:   Protection of the Bauhaus style of architecture

Subject:

There are still numerous examples in Europe of the famous Bauhaus style of architecture. There are fewer examples of the style in Athens, though there are a number, particularly in the city centre. However, these buildings are deteriorating at an ever-increasing rate.

Is there any Community legislation to protect examples of this architectural style in the Member States? Are the creations of outstanding architects (such as Horta in Brussels, for example) protected by means of Community funding to preserve them? Can the Commission make representations to the Greek authorities to enhance their awareness of the need to protect the Bauhaus style of architecture in Athens?

Answer given by Mrs Reding on behalf of the Commission

(19 December 2003)

(19 December 2003)

| 1. | The competence conferred on the Community under Article 151 (ex 128) of the EC Treaty extends no further than encouraging cooperation between Member States in the field of culture. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The competence conferred on the Community under Article 151 (ex 128) of the EC Treaty extends no further than encouraging cooperation between Member States in the field of culture.

| 2. | On this basis, the Commission adopted the ‘Culture 2000’ programme, which is the single financing and programming instrument for cultural cooperation within the Union. Within the framework of this programme, and in line with the selection criteria laid down therein, the Commission may support projects co-produced and co-financed by at least three promoters from at least countries participating in the programme.
  The Honourable Member will find additional information on the website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/culture/c2000). |
| --- | --- |

2.

On this basis, the Commission adopted the ‘Culture 2000’ programme, which is the single financing and programming instrument for cultural cooperation within the Union. Within the framework of this programme, and in line with the selection criteria laid down therein, the Commission may support projects co-produced and co-financed by at least three promoters from at least countries participating in the programme.

The Honourable Member will find additional information on the website (http://europa.eu.int/comm/culture/c2000).

| 3. | The final aspect of the question raised by the Honourable Member does not fall within the Community's competence. By virtue of the principle of subsidiarity, it falls within the sole competence of the Member State. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The final aspect of the question raised by the Honourable Member does not fall within the Community's competence. By virtue of the principle of subsidiarity, it falls within the sole competence of the Member State.

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 37 (Wednesday, February 25, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 10007]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03905]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 622

[Docket No. 131211999-5045-02]
RIN 0648-BD86


Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; 
Coastal Migratory Pelagic Resources in the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic 
Region; Amendment 20B; Correction

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the final rule to 
implement Amendment 20B to the Fishery Management Plan for the Coastal 
Migratory Pelagic Resources in the exclusive economic zone of the Gulf 
of Mexico and Atlantic Region (Amendment 20B) that was published in the 
Federal Register January 27, 2015.

DATES: This correction is effective March 1, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anik Clemens, 727-551-5611; email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4a0b2423216409262f272f24390a24252b2b642d253c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="91d0fff8fabfd2fdf4fcf4ffe2d1fffef0f0bff6fee7">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Need for Correction

    On January 27, 2015, (80 FR 4216), NMFS published an incorrect 
annual catch limit (ACL) value for Atlantic migratory group Spanish 
mackerel in Sec.  622.388(d)(1)(iii). The commercial ACL for Atlantic 
migratory group Spanish mackerel is equal to the commercial quota. The 
commercial quota value was published correctly in Sec.  622.384(c)(2), 
however, the commercial ACL value was published incorrectly in Sec.  
622.388(d)(1)(iii). This document corrects the commercial ACL value for 
Atlantic migratory group Spanish mackerel.

Correction

    1. On page 4223, in the first column, Sec.  622.388(d)(1)(iii) is 
correctly revised to read as follows:


Sec.  622.388   Annual catch limits (ACLs), annual catch targets 
(ACTs), and accountability measures (AMs).

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (iii) The commercial ACL for the Atlantic migratory group Spanish 
mackerel is 3.33 million lb (1.51 million kg).
* * * * *

    Dated: February 19, 2015.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-03905 Filed 2-24-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 139 

To permanently allow an exclusion under the Supplemental Security Income 

program and the Medicaid program for compensation provided to individuals who participate in clinical trials for rare diseases or conditions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 8, 2015 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself, Mr. HATCH, Mr. MARKEY, and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To permanently allow an exclusion under the Supplemental 

Security Income program and the Medicaid program for 

compensation provided to individuals who participate in 

clinical trials for rare diseases or conditions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Access to 

5 Clinical Trials Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF SUNSET PROVISION. 

7 Effective as if included in the enactment of the Im8 proving Access to Clinical Trials Act of 2009 (Public Law 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 139 IS

1 111–255, 124 Stat. 2640), section 3 of that Act is amend2 ed by striking subsection (e). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
     Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999 and is qualified
     in its entirity by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1999
<CASH>                                         7,084
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  321,413
<ALLOWANCES>                                   24,784
<INVENTORY>                                    234,856
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               546,204
<PP&E>                                         2,645,335
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,564,715
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 626,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,314,609
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    2,400,000
<COMMON>                                       61,674
<OTHER-SE>                                    (3,157,096)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   626,824
<SALES>                                        992,305
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               992,305
<CGS>                                          409,980
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  510,006
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,902
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                69,417
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            69,417
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   69,417
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.01




</TABLE>
USCIB: S/408 

USUICUD - SiCtJRM Dr.ORllA.i'ml 

MJllORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

--- oo/ssc.. 

C!f 5 

I J30 Ootober 1952 

Subject.: Reatricticm en ottic1al Viaita to Landan 

Preceding and Following the CoraaatiClll ot 

Queen Elimabet.h II. 

The 1nc:l08ed IHlllOl"andum en the abo'l8 subject ha been 

race1Y8d trca SUS1.o and 1a forwarded for intonation. 

Inoloaul'8 - l 

SUSLO S81"1al 7799 above 

aubject, dtd 15 Oct 52. 

USCIB: 5/408 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-09-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

RESTRICTED
# CE2004078EN.01054303.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/543 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/543

---

(2004/C 78 E/0566)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3418/03

by Mario Borghezio (NI) to the Commission

(18 November 2003)

Subject:   Eurostat scandal — unanswered questions

Subject:

Can the Commission clarify what it understands to be the political responsibility of the Commissioners with regard to the recommendations of the Committee of Independent Experts and the code of conduct for contracts signed in 1999?

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Dieter P. Schilling, President and Chief Executive Officer of Delphax Technologies Inc. (the
Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: August 13, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Dieter P. Schilling              
|                       |  |     |  | Dieter P. Schilling                  
|                       |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 915/2006

of 21 June 2006         

amending Regulation (EC) No 2148/96 laying down rules for evaluating and monitoring public intervention stocks of agricultural products

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3492/90 of 27 November 1990 laying down the factors to be taken into consideration in the annual accounts for the financing of intervention measures in the form of public storage by the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, Guarantee Section (1), and in particular Article 8 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 2148/96 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 June 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 337, 4.12.1990, p. 3.

(2)OJ L 288, 9.11.1996, p. 6. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 808/1999 (OJ L 102, 17.4.1999, p. 70).

(3)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(4)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 218/2006 (OJ L 38, 9.2.2006, p. 19).

----

ANNEX

In Annex III to Regulation (EEC) No 2148/96, the following points are added:

‘VII —   BULK SUGAR (*1)

A.   Physical inspection procedure for public stocks of sugar from the 2006/07 marketing year onwards

B.   Physical inspection procedure for public stocks of sugar from the 2004/05 and 2005/06 marketing years

C.   Procedure where discrepancies are found

Some tolerance is permitted when verifying the volume.

Article 6 shall apply where the weight of the products stored as recorded during the physical inspection (volumetric measurement) differs from the book weight by 5 % or more for bulk sugar in the case of storage in silos or on-floor storage.

Where bulk sugar is stored in a silo/warehouse, the quantities weighed on entry into storage may be recorded instead of those resulting from a volume assessment if the latter does not provide a degree of accuracy considered adequate and the difference between the two figures is not excessive.

The intervention agency shall make use of the option provided for in the third paragraph where justified by circumstances, on a case-by-case basis and on its own responsibility. It shall indicate that it has done so in its report.

VIII —   PACKED SUGAR (*1)

A.   Physical inspection procedure for public stocks of sugar from the 2006/07 marketing year onwards

B.   Physical inspection procedure for public stocks of sugar from the 2004/05 and 2005/06 marketing years

----

(*1)  The inventory shall be carried out on stocks which are subject to a storage contract.’         ’

----
#### Dillon, Respondent, vs. Dillon, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Thos. J. O’Brien*of Hudson and *F. M. White*of River. Falls.

For the respondent: *W. T. Doar*of New Richmond.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1624 

To provide predictability and certainty in the tax law, create jobs, and 

encourage investment. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 18, 2015 

Ms. STABENOW (for herself, Mr. BURR, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Ms. AYOTTE, Mr. 

PETERS, Mr. WICKER, Mr. NELSON, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. WARNER, and 

Mr. MORAN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide predictability and certainty in the tax law, create 

jobs, and encourage investment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Motorsports Fairness 

5 and Permanency Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1624 IS

1 SEC. 2. 7-YEAR CLASS LIFE FOR MOTORSPORTS ENTER2 TAINMENT COMPLEX FACILITIES MADE PER3 MANENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 168(i)(15) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subpara6 graph (D). 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

9 December 31, 2014. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
USCIB: 5.2/96 

!OP SBSRf11' y. 8. iliS omu 

MiMORANDUM FOR THE MDIBEBS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Tentative }iinutes. 

24 

HANDLE V!A eeM!N'i' e~ om.¥ 

- 6 June 1955 

1. Attached is a copy of the tentative minutes for the 115th Meeting 

of USCIB. Please advise the Secretary if any changes are desired. 

2. In the event there is no objection to these minutes on the part 

ot USCIB members by l5 June 1955 they will be considered approved. 

Enclosure 

1 copy of Tentative Minute~, 

115th Meeting of USCIB. 

USCIB: 5.2/96 

.. 

TOP S£CRE~ 

USCIB 

eclassifi ed and approved for release 

y NSA on 11-17-2014 pursuantto 

.0. 13526 
- ' . 

90NFl9EiN'l3:A±i g. S. E¥i8 QN:b¥ 

- ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH MEfil'ING 

OF THE 

UNITED STATES COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE BOARD 

Lt. General Charles P. Cabell, USAF, Acting Chairman 

PRESENT: 

STATE: 

DEFENSE: 

FBI: 

NSA: 

~: 

!fil: 

AIR FORCE: 

CIA: 

-

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY: 

SECREl'ARIAT: 

ALSO PRESENT: 

STATE: .-

DEFENSE: 

FBI: 

NSA: 

-

Mr. W. Park Armstrong, Jr. 

General Graves B. Erskine, USMC (Ret.) 

Mr. Victor P. Keay 

(for Mr. L. V. Boardman) 

Lt. General Ralph J. Canine, USA 

Major General Robert A. Schow 

(for Major General Arthur G. Trudeau) 

Rear Admiral Robert W. Cavenagh· 

(for Rear Admiral Carl F. Espe) 

Major General John A. Samford 

Mr. Huntington D. Sheldon 

Captain Rufus L •. Taylor, USN 

Mr. Hamill D. Jones 

Mrs. Daphne O. Tucker 

Mr. T. Achilles Po]¥zoides 

Mr. Robert F. Packard 

Mr. Robert G. Walker 

Mr. Philip J. Patton 

Mr. S. Drake Ellis 

Major General John B. Ackerman, USAF 

Captain Jack S. Holtwick, Jr.-, USN 

Lt. Commander Paul J. Karl, Jr., USN 

Mr. Benson K. Buffham 

COffFI-BENTIAL 
-,. . 

CONFifiEN'fIAL - e.s. :irras ONL¥ 

ARMY: 

NAVY: 

AIR FORCE: 

CIA: 

COOUTTEE CHAIRMEN: 

Major General Harry Reichelderter 

Lt. Colonel Richard Leffers 

Commander William F. Bringle 

Colonel Charles P. Richman 

Lt. Colonel Frank J. Harrold, Jr. 

Captain Allen T. Miller 

Mr. Frank B. Rowlett 

I 

Lt. Co°lonel Henry C. Simmons, USAF (INTCOM) 

Major William R. Culmer, USA (SECCCM) 

The 115th Meeting ot the United States Comnrunications Intelligence 

Board was held in the Director's Conference Room, Administration Building, 

Central Intelligence Agency, at 1030, Friday, 20 May 1955. 

- 2 -

CONFIDEA'TIAL 

OGA 
SUBJECT NUMBER 

USCIB: 5.2/95 

Subject: 

REF ID:A67781 

TENTATIVE 

Item 1 of the Agenda for the 115th Meeting of USCIB, 

held on 20 May 1955. 

Approval of Final Minutes of the 114th Meeting. . 

The ACTING CHAIRMAN (General Cabell) asked if there were any objections to the subject minutes. 

There were no oqjections. 

DECISION: (20 May 1955) USCIB approved the final minutes of the 114th 

Meeting as written. 

USCIB: 5.2/95 - 3 -
# **EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

 

Inconnection with the December 31, 2004 Form 10-K of Cornell Companies, Inc. (the“Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, John R. Nieser, Chief Financial Officer, certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
|   |   | /s/  John R. Nieser                      |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | John  R. Nieser, Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   | March 16, 2005                           |

 

----