alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 30, 2009

l1027 

# Order

October 30, 2009

139309

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139309 COA: 291210 Gogebic CC: 2008-000109-FH ORLANDO RAY GRAY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 1, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, purs uant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the sentence of the Gogebic Circuit Court and we
REMAND this case to the trial court for rese ntencing. On remand the trial court shall reconsider the scoring of OV 15 in light of this Court’s opinion in People v McGraw , 484 Mich 120 (2009). The trial co urt shall sentence the defend ant within the appropriate sentencing guidelines range, or articulate on the record a substantial and compelling reason for departing from the sentencing guidelines range in accordance with People v
Babcock , 469 Mich 247 (2003). In all other respect s, the application for leave to appeal
is denied because we are not persuaded that the question pres ented should be reviewed by
this Court.

C ORRIGAN , J. ( concurring ).

I concur in the order remanding for rese ntencing so that the sentencing court can
consider whether this Court’s decision in People v McGraw , 484 Mich 120 (2009), affects the scoring of offense variable 15, but I continue to adhere to my dissenting opinion in McGraw , 484 Mich at 136.

W EAVER , J. ( dissenting ).

I dissent because I would not vacate the sentence and remand this case. Instead, I would grant leave to appeal in order to reconsider People v McGraw , 484 Mich 120 (2009), for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in that case, id. at 136.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                       Exhibit A
 
     CFO Steps Down at ON Technology Corporation

Cambridge, Mass., April 5/PRNewswire/ -- ON Technology Corporation (Nasdaq: ONTC
news) today announced that John Bogdan resigned as Chief Financial Officer and
Vice President of Finance for personal reasons.

Stephen Wietrecki, Director of Finance and Information Technologies has been
appointed the interim Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance.
| 1.   | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,      2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ending March 31, 2009 fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates      presented and the results of operations of the  Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ John X. Adiletta         |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| John      X. Adiletta        |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer |
| Chief      Financial Officer |   |
REF ID:A58138 

MEMO R NG SLIP I NEVER USE FOR APPROVALS, PPROVALS, 

CONCURRENCES, OR S/Ml 'J4CTIONS 

1 NAME OR TITLE INITIALS CIRCULATE 

- ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION DATE COORDINATION 

2 FILE 

- INFORMATION 

3 NECESSARY 

AcrtON 

NarE AND 

RETURN 

4 SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

REMARKS 

Tlfe.,4 are lltO ~JC 't'rl!P. ~· ~1es 

t> f. "" :5 (:'/ 8 9-.:l// tJ ~ '9. ~/;l.. 

avA·l~hl~. 

{ J.,T. Jl;i/J] 7'(,,~ ad~ I W, ~f .,-11.h,, t' ~~,a. 

ef P/p hA.v' ./"./~ COf"JI' 6 ""'J,,e It 

~e '10 \"VO..., & "" 

, I' ~4,,Je.J. Cit""" 

~:pproved for Release by NSA on 06-10-2014 

3526 

pursuant to E.O.J 

S!fu? 

FROM NAME OR TITLE DATE 

41 """ ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION TELEPHONE
<PAGE>


                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.4.3


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Maureen Ryan, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing  distribution  or  servicing  reports  filed in  respect  of  periods
included in the year covered by this annual report,  of American  Express Master
Trust;

2.  Based on my knowledge,  the  information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not  contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
material  fact  necessary  to  make  the  statements   made,  in  light  of  the
circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and  servicing,  or
similar, agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4.  Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance  statement  included in
the report and required to be delivered  to the trustee in  accordance  with the
terms of the  pooling  and  servicing,  or  similar,  agreement,  and  except as
disclosed in the reports,  the servicer has fulfilled its obligations  under the
servicing agreement; and

5.  The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum  servicing  standards based upon the report provided
by an independent  public  accountant,  after  conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform  Single  Attestation  Program for  Mortgage  Bankers or similar
procedure,  as set forth in the pooling and  servicing,  or similar,  agreement,
that is included in these reports.


Date:  March 31, 2005

 /s/ Maureen Ryan
-------------------
Name:  Maureen Ryan
Title: President, American Express Receivables Financing Corporation
ex4-12.htm


    Exhibit 4.12

      CERTIFICATE
OF TRUST

      


      OF

      


      FIRST
FINANCIAL CAPITAL TRUST II

      


      


      


      THIS
CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF FIRST FINANCIAL CAPITAL TRUST II (the “Trust”) is being
duly executed and filed by the undersigned on behalf of the Trust to form a
statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. §§3801 et seq.) (the
“Act”).

      


      


      
        	
                 
      

              	
                1.

              	
                Name.  The
      name of the statutory trust being formed is First Financial Capital Trust
      II.

              


      

      


      
        	
                 
      

              	
                2.

              	
                Trustee.  The
      name and business address of the trustee of the Trust with its principal
      place of business in the State of Delaware are as
  follows:

              


      

      


      Wilmington Trust Company

      1100 North Market Street

      Wilmington, DE 19890-1605

      ATTN: Corporate Trust
Services

      


      


      IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Trust in
accordance with Section 3811(a) of the Act.

      


      


      WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY,

      not in
its individual capacity but solely as Delaware Trustee of the Trust

      


      


      


      By:      /s/ Erik E.
Overcash                    

      Name: Erik E. Overcash

      Title:   Assistant Vice
President
Exhibit 31.4



CERTIFICATION



I, Danny Zheng, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K of Imation Corp.; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 29, 2016



| | /s/ Danny Zheng        
| | -----------------------
| | Danny Zheng            
| |                        
| | Chief Financial Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6508** 

SYLVESTER ANTERRIO BOONE , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. WARDEN BENARD MACKIE , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Rock Hill
. Mary G. Lewis , District Judge. ( 0:15

- cv - 01503

- MGL )

Submitted : September 13, 2016 Decided: September 15, 2016

Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Sylvester Anterrio Boone, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Sylvester Anterrio Boone seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealabilit y. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner sa tisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 5 29 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Boone has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense w ith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
99-769.

#### State v. Jones.

Montgomery App. No. 17382. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed March 23,1999:

“Does an arrest in violation of R.C. 2935.26 constitute an unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 14 of the Ohio Constitution, thereby requiring suppression of evidence seized as a consequence of the violation of that statute?”

Resnick, J., not participating.

*Sua sponte,*this cause is consolidated with 99-613, *infra.*

Resnick, J., not participating.

The conflict cases are *State v. Holmes*(1985), 28 Ohio App.3d 12, 28 OBR 21, 501 N.E.2d 629; *State v. Heideman*(June 23, 1988), Ross App. No. 1429, unreported, 1988 WL 69122; and *State v. Wilkinson*(Sept. 30, 1986), Huron App. No. H-85-27, unreported, 1986 WL 11411.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1230 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to establish a program under which 

the Director of the Bureau of Land Management shall enter into memoranda of understanding with States providing for State oversight of 

oil and gas production activities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 6, 2015 

Ms. MURKOWSKI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to establish a program 

under which the Director of the Bureau of Land Management shall enter into memoranda of understanding 

with States providing for State oversight of oil and gas 

production activities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STATE OVERSIGHT OF OIL AND GAS PRO4 GRAMS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—On request of the Governor of a 

6 State, the Secretary of the Interior shall establish a pro7 gram under which the Director of the Bureau of Land 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1230 IS

1 Management shall enter into a memorandum of under2 standing with the State to create consistent rules and 

3 processes for the measurement of oil and gas production 

4 activities, inspection of meters or other measurement 

5 methodologies, and other operational activities, as deter6 mined by the Secretary of the Interior. 

7 (b) ELIGIBILITY.—To be eligible for the program de8 scribed in subsection (a), a State shall administer oil and 

9 gas programs in the State sufficient to fulfill the oversight 

10 and enforcement responsibilities of the Bureau of Land 

11 Management, as determined by the Secretary of the Inte12 rior. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Promissory Note-Joseph Hines, dated March 31, 2007



 Exhibit 10.4 
 PROMISSORY NOTE 
 Spheric Technologies, Inc. agrees to pay to Joseph Hines the amount of $63,600.00
upon demand after April 1, 2007 for value received with no interest noted. This amount has been created by funding loans to Spheric Technologies as a Founder in the first quarter of calendar year 2007 — please see the attached schedule.
This liability is to be paid in US dollars or equivalent and should be considered a general obligation of the Company. 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Michael Kirksey

		 	Michael Kirksey
	Its:	 	Vice President
	Date:	 	March 31, 2007
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Tornado Climatology of the Contiguous United States (NUREG/CR-4461, Revision 2; PNNL-15112, Revision 2)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-4461, Revision 2 (PDF - 1.70 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**December 2006**Date Published:**February 2007

**Prepared by:** J.V. Ramsdell, Jr., J.P. Rishel

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory P.O. Box 999 Richland, Washington 99352  Operated by Battelle Memorial Institute

A.J. Buslik, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Risk Assessment and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code N6337

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Characteristics of tornadoes reported in the contiguous United States from January 1950 through August 2003 have been used to determine tornado strike probabilities and maximum wind speeds for use in nuclear power plant design. Maps have been prepared that show the distribution of tornado events and design wind speeds. Appendices contain the number of tornadoes and estimates of strike probabilities and maximum wind speeds by 1°, 2°, and 4° latitude and longitude boxes.

The methods used in this analysis are identical to those used in the analysis leading to publication of the tornado climatology in NUREG/CR-4461, Rev. 1. The primary difference between the climatology presented here and the climatology in Rev. 1 is that wind speed estimates in this climatology are based on the Enhanced Fujita Scale that correlates wind speeds with damage caused by tornadoes. These wind speeds are significantly lower than the wind speeds in the original Fujita Scale. A second difference is that the wind speeds in the Enhanced Fujita Scale are nominally 3-second average wind speeds, whereas the wind speeds in the original Fujita Scale were nominally the fastest quarter-mile wind speeds. The National Weather Service intends to implement the Enhanced Fujita Scale by February 2007.

The results of this analysis indicate that a maximum wind speed of about 230 mph is appropriate for tornadoes with a best estimate probability of 10-7  per year for the central portion of the United States; a maximum wind speed of 200 mph is appropriate for a region of the United States along the east coast, and the western great plains; and a maximum wind speed of 160 mph is appropriate for the western United States. Corresponding wind speeds in NUREG/CR-4461, Rev. 1, were 300 mph, 260 mph, and 200 mph, respectively.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
##### 



Exhibit 99.2 Consent of Independent
Auditors We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form F-3 No. 333-7284, No. 333-14102,
No. 333-91034 and 333-99073) of SK Telecom Co., Ltd. and in
the related Prospectus of our report dated January 25,
2002, with respect to the financial statements of Shinsegi
Telecomm, Inc., referenced in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of
SK Telecom Co., Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2003. /s/ Young Wha Young Wha Corporation Seoul, Korea
May 31, 2004
.. 

USCIB: 5.1/15 l!MmJ:.l!i '/IA SCJUN'f 61WffmS O!aa¥ 

28 July 1955 

GQ'NFIBEN'f Ifdl 

MEMORANDtM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Change in FBI Membership. 

The enclosed memorandum indicating a change in FBI membership on 

USCIB is forwarded for information. 

Enclosure 

a/s 

USCIB: 5.1/15 

USCIB 

HA)TJJtJi: l1J:A COMM QKAHNl!iLS OHL!' 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-10-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 

CQf\'FIDENTJAL 

24 
• 24 9 

UNITED STATES DEPARI'MENT OF JUSTICE 

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 

Mr. Allen W. Dulles 

Chainnan 

U. S. Camnunications 

Intelligence Board 

Wdshington, D. C. 

Dear Mr. Dulles: 

Washington 25, D. C. 

July 22, 1955 

VIA LIAISON 

• 

This is to advise that I am 

designating Inspector C. E. Hennrich to 

replace Mr. L. V. Boardman as this Bureau's 

representative on the U. S. Communications 

Intelligence Board. 

Mr. V. P. Keay will continue as 

the designated alternate. 

Sincerely yours, 

(Signed) John Edgar Hoover 

Director 

Enclosure with USCIB 5.1/15 dtd 28 July 1955. 

COl\'-FIDENTIAL
EXHIBIT: 23.1



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board Of Directors
Optimal Robotics Corp.



We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statement  (No.
333-65530) on Form S-8 of Optimal  Robotics  Corp. of our report dated  February
18, 2002,  relating to the consolidated  balance sheet of Optimal Robotics Corp.
as of December 31, 2001 and the related  consolidated  statements of operations,
retained  earnings and cash flows for the year then ended,  which report appears
in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Optimal Robotics Corp.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Chartered Accountants



March 28, 2002

Montreal, Canada


                                      107
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 • 

DORIAN Attachment 

HANDLE VIA BYEMAN USIB-D-41. 13/24 

CONTROL SYSTEM ONLY (COMOR-D-13/48) 

21 July 1965 

Special Limited 

0 Distribution 

Y THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE 

• Washington 25, D.C. 

19 July 1965 - 

MEMORANDUM FOR: The Honorable Robert S. McNamara 

Secretary of Defense 

SUBJECT: The Manned Orbital Laboratory 

This will confirm that, in accordance with the understanding 

reached at the meeting of the President's Space Council on 9 July 1965, 

I have instructed the appropriate committee of the United States Intelligence Board (USIB) to examine the intelligence requirements for very 

high resolution photography of the character envisaged for acquisition 

by the Manned Orbital Laboratory (MOL).: Obviously Obviously it is important that 

the USIB study of requirements should be based on as full an understanding 

as possible of the projected capabilities'and performance characteristics 

of the MOL. Accordingly, I am writing Dr: Brown to suggest that he 

arrange to have the members of the USIB COmmittee on Overhead Reconnaissance, as well as members of USIB,. briefed on the intelligence 

potentialities of the MOL. As an assessment of these potentialities may 

change as development of the system proceeds, I think it will be desirable 

for a representative of Dr. Brown's office to maintain contact with the 

Chairman of the USIB Committee on Overhead Reconnaissance on a 

continuing basis so that USIB may be kept informed of any changes in the 

design or concept of the MOL which would have an effect on its intelligence 

collection capabilities. In,the meantime, USIB is proceeding with its 

study of the needs of the intelligence cornrnainity for 

resolution of photographic coverage, which'i is the performance which I 

understand to be ultimately contemplated for the MOL. 

(signed) 

W. F. RABORN 

cc: Mr. Vance 

Dr. Brown 

General Carroll 

HANDLE VIA BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM ONLY 

BYE4662-65 A 

DORIAN 

TO.? ,97 Cti IT
<PAGE>

                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                            WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 8-K

                                CURRENT REPORT

                      PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                    THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



      Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): SEPTEMBER 2, 1999


                            LIFELINE SYSTEMS, INC.
        --------------------------------------------------------------
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


  MASSACHUSETTS                      0-13617              04-2537528
---------------------------        -----------        ------------------
(State or other juris-             (Commission        (IRS Employer
diction of incorporation)            File No.)        Identification No.)

111 LAWRENCE STREET, FRAMINGHAM, MA                           02139
-----------------------------------                        ------------
(Address of principal executive offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (508) 988-1000
<PAGE>

Item 5.   Other Events.
          ------------

     On September 2, 1999, Lifeline Systems, Inc. and Protection One, Inc.
announced the mutual termination of the merger agreement and the related stock
option agreement between the two companies.

Item 7.   Financial Statements and Exhibits.
          ---------------------------------

          (c)  Exhibits

          99.1 Press Release dated September 2, 1999.

                                       2
<PAGE>

                                  SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Date: September 10, 1999                   LIFELINE SYSTEMS, INC.
                                        ----------------------------
                                                (Registrant)



                                        By: /s/ Ronald Feinstein
                                            --------------------------
                                        Ronald Feinstein
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer

                                 EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit        Description
-------        -----------

99.1           Press Release dated September 2, 1999.

                                       3