alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1452 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1452

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility for 
 reimbursement for emergency medical treatment and to require that the 
 Department of Veterans Affairs be treated as a participating provider 
 for the recovery of the costs of certain medical care, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2015

  Ms. Hirono introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility for 
 reimbursement for emergency medical treatment and to require that the 
 Department of Veterans Affairs be treated as a participating provider 
 for the recovery of the costs of certain medical care, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Emergency Health Care 
Safety Net Expansion Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT REIMBURSEMENT FOR 
              CERTAIN VETERANS.

    Section 1725(b) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``an active Department 
        health-care participant'' and inserting ``enrolled in the 
        health care system established under section 1705(a) of this 
        title'';
            (2) by striking paragraph (2); and
            (3) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2).

SEC. 3. TREATMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AS PARTICIPATING 
              PROVIDER FOR RECOVERY OF COSTS OF CERTAIN MEDICAL CARE.

    Section 1729(f) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``(f) No law'' and inserting the following:
    ``(f)(1) In the case of a veteran who is entitled to care (or 
payment of the expenses of care) under a health-plan contract, for 
purposes of reimbursement for providing care or services under this 
chapter to that veteran for a non-service-connected disability 
described in subparagraph (D) or (E) of subsection (a)(2), the 
Department shall be treated as a participating provider under that 
health-plan contract.
    ``(2) No law''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2005131EN.01000901.xml

| 28.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/9

---

NEW NATIONAL SIDE OF EURO CIRCULATION COINS

NEW NATIONAL SIDE OF EURO CIRCULATION COINS

(2005/C 131/09)

Image

Euro circulation coins have legal tender status throughout the euro area. The Commission publishes all new euro coin designs (1) with a view to informing anyone required to handle coins in the course of their work and the public at large. In accordance with the Council conclusions of 8 December 2003 (2), Member States and countries that have concluded a Monetary Agreement with the Community providing for the issuance of euro circulation coins are allowed to issue certain quantities of commemorative euro circulation coins on condition that not more than one new coin design is issued per country per year and that only the 2 EUR denomination is used. These coins have the technical features of normal euro circulation coins, but bear a commemorative design on the obverse national side.

1

2

Issuing State: Spain

Subject of commemoration: 4th centenary of the first edition of ‘The ingenious nobleman Don Quixote of La Mancha’

th

Factual description of the design: The inner part of the coin depicts an image of ‘El Ingenioso Hidalgo Don Quijote de la Mancha’, who appears holding a lance, and windmills in the background. To the left, there is a marked sector in which the word ‘ESPAÑA’ appears incused, and underneath this sector the MINT mark ‘M’. On the outer ring of the coin, the twelve stars of the European Union are depicted, with, on the right, four of them (corresponding to the positions 1, 2, 3 and 4 on a clock) incused within an arc. The year of mintage appears at the bottom among three stars.

Issue volume: 8 million coins

Approximate issue period: April 2005

---

(1)  See OJ C 373 of 28.12.2001, pp. 1-30 for a reference to all national sides that were issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See conclusions of the General Affairs Council of 8 December 2003 on changes in the design of national sides of euro coins. See also Commission Recommendation of 29 September 2003 on a common practice for changes to the design of national obverse sides of euro circulation coins (OJ L 264 of 15.10.2003, p. 38-39).

2

---
1PIECRE1

11111,1111Pm

r' NATIONAL NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

THE,NRO STAFF

II

II

5 March 1973

Dr. WIcLuoas hen seen.

MEMORANDUN FOR COLONEL KULPA AND MR

General Allen called this morning to report on an informal

conversation with Dr. Schlesinger. Dr. Schlesinger explained

that the President had instructed him to take over chairmanship of-the Executive Committee in order to give him control

for carrying out his Community responsibilities. It was not

Dr. Schlesinger's intent to cause a change in the way the

Department of Defense carries out the program--the DNRO could

w211 stay as the Under Secretary of the Air Force.

General Allen suggested that we would want to submit a

revised draft of the NSCID and that we should specifically •

require that the Deputy Secretary of Defense be the DOD ExCom

member. From then on the NSCID could talk about ExCom actions

without specific reference to DCI or DepSecDef responsibilities.

General Allen reported that Dr. Schlesinger said it was not

meant for the DNRO to report to the DCI on a daily basis.

0

CIASSWIE0111111111EXEPAFT PROM

GENEkAL 0 SCHEDULE Of

EXECUTIVE ORDER 1H52 EXEMPTION CATEGORY NW Qtr A. 511 Iv' 'It

IIIIMICTIM Rh IS 110.11 Ml 4101.0

CINIIMOL 110 Internal 

COM Sr PPM

1445 1 Pons s
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Dione Bitzer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Almaden Minerals Ltd.;



2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.             The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:



(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5.             The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.



|Dated: July 25, 2005 | Signed:  /s/Dione Bitzer
|-------------------- | ------------------------
|                     | Dione Bitzer            
|                     | Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 5, 2017

d1212

Order 

Clerk

January 5, 2017

154073

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 154073

COA: 332961

Ionia CC: 08-013837-FC

CHRISTOPHER DIBBLE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 26, 2016 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release #01-2012 

Contact: (703) 808-5050 January 26, 2012 

 

 

Declassified Gambit-Hexagon Satellites 

Displayed at the National Air Force Museum 

 

National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), military, industry officials, and alumni, 

attended a ceremony today placing the recently declassified NRO KH-7 Gambit 1, KH8 Gambit 3, and KH-9 Hexagon reconnaissance satellites on display at the National 

Museum of the U.S. Air Force, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, OH. 

These satellites operated from 1963 to 1984 and were among the most important 

U.S. photoreconnaissance systems, producing more than 91,000 linear feet of film

combined. This imagery played a critical role in maintaining U.S. national security 

during the Cold War. The NRO publically unveiled these satellites last year during its 

50th Anniversary celebration. 

“Over the last 50 years, from reconnaissance planes to reconnaissance satellites, 

the NRO’s systems have been and continue to be the foundation for global 

situational awareness in protecting our nation,” said NRO Director Bruce Carlson. 

“The systems honored today were critical for monitoring key targets in the USSR and 

around the globe and provided much needed cartographic information to the 

Department of Defense to produce accurate, large-scale maps. Gambit and Hexagon

were America’s eyes in space and the most sophisticated satellites of their time.”

Gambit-Hexagon information, including images and photos released for today’s 

ceremony, is available at www.nro.gov.

The NRO is a joint Department of Defense-Intelligence Community organization 

responsible for developing, launching, and operating America’s signals, imagery, and 

communications satellites to meet the needs of our nation. 

-NRONATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

14675 Lee Road

Chantilly, VA 20151-1715
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 18, 2020.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1422

Lower Tribunal Nos. 79-20647 and 79-20648

________________

Mark Anthony Dingle,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the 

Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Laura Shearon Cruz, Judge.

Mark Anthony Dingle, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE, and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### In the Matter of Lisa Lewis, Appellant, v Francis A. Redhead, Respondent.

[774 NYS2d 62]

In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Grosvenor, J.), dated January 7, 2003, which, inter alia, denied her objections to an order of the same court (Fasone, H.E.), dated July 15, 2002, which, among other things, in effect, denied her application for child care expenses.

*601Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof denying the appellant’s objections to so much of the order dated July 15, 2002, as, in effect, denied her application for child care expenses, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, to determine the respondent’s pro rata share of child care expenses in accordance with Family Court Act § 413 (1) (c) (4); as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Family Court Act § 413 (1) (c) (4) provides that “[w]here the custodial parent is working . . . and incurs child care expenses as a result thereof, the court shall determine reasonable child care expenses and such child care expenses, where incurred, shall be prorated in the same proportion as each parent’s income is to the combined parental income” *(see also Matter of Jimenez v Jimenez,*222 AD2d 589 [1995]). A parent’s pro rata share of child care expenses is predicated upon the custodial parent *(Matter of Nolan v Nolan,*215 AD2d 795, 796 [1995]; *Koczaja v Koczaja,*195 AD2d 693, 695 [1993]).

It is undisputed that the petitioner, the custodial parent, is employed full time. There was testimony elicited as to the cost of the child care program and that the petitioner appeared to be in compliance with her payments. Under such circumstances, it was error for the hearing examiner to conclude, inter alia, that the petitioner’s failure to provide cancelled checks acted as a bar to an award of child care costs in her favor.

However, on the record before us, the parties’ respective incomes at the time of the petitioner’s application for child care expenses cannot be determined. Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Family Court, Kings County, for a determination of the respondent’s pro rata share of child expenses care in accordance with Family Court Act § 413 (1) (c) (4).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., S. Miller, Schmidt and Rivera, JJ., concur.
NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Oct. 15, 2019

Contact NRO

Loretta De Sio, Director of Public Affairs 

(703) 808-5050

mediarelations@nro.mil

Contact NGA

Don Kerr, Director, News and Information

(571) 557-5450

mediarelations@nga.mil

NRO awards Planet contract as part of transition of commercial imagery acquisition

CHANTILLY, Va. – The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) today announced the transition of the 

Planet commercial imagery subscription service from the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) 

to the NRO. 

As part of the transition, the NRO awarded Planet an unclassified, multi-year subscription service 

contract for daily, large-area, 3-5 meter resolution commercial imagery collection. 

Recognizing the importance of mission continuity, the scope of the new NRO contract is comparable to 

NGA’s previous contracts with Planet and includes access to new daily unclassified imagery over 

multiple areas of interest to military planners, warfighters, and the national security community. 

The transition is consistent with NGA’s and NRO’s role in exploring new and viable commercial GEOINT 

opportunities for national security missions. 

“With its large constellation of satellites, Planet can image country – and even continent-sized areas –

every day,” said Pete Muend, director, NRO’s Commercial Systems Program Office. “This capability to 

provide daily revisit over large areas of the Earth gives analysts unparalleled opportunities to discover 

and monitor activity for a wide range of applications.”

“The NRO is committed to ensuring NGA and its customers continue to have access to Planet imagery to 

perform the vital analysis needed to create value-added geospatial products for our partners and policy 

makers,” said Muend. 

“NGA’s 2016 Planet subscription played a role in our analytic transformation, where we are now focused 

less on pixels and more on information content and services,” said David Gauthier, director of NGA’s 

Source Commercial and Business Operations Group. 

Gauthier said Planet imagery demonstrated the value that daily revisit of large areas, at 3-5 meter 

resolutions, to several mission areas – especially when combined with geospatial analytics.

“With the transition, NGA can continue to shift its focus to emerging commercial GEOINT products and 

services that uniquely support our user community,” said Gauthier. 

###
PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# NRO launches first dedicated launch from Wallops Island

By StaffNational Reconnaissance Office

                CHANTILLY, Va.  –              
The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) successfully launched its first dedicated mission from NASA Wallops Flight Facility, Virginia, at 09:46 a.m. EDT on July 15, 2020.

The NROL-129 mission launched aboard a Northrop Grumman Minotaur IV rocket from the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport’s Pad 0B. This was the first Minotaur mission from Wallops since 2013.

“NROL-129 represents a collaboration between the NRO and our industry partners to design, build, launch and operate a system of satellites that will demonstrate revolutionary capabilities of value to the nation and our allies,” said Dr. Chris Scolese, the agency’s director. “Despite facing challenges in 2020, we have found new and better ways to collaborate with our partners from a distance, relentlessly pursuing our mission and denying sanctuary to our adversaries. I want to thank all of those involved across NASA, Northrop Grumman, Virginia Space, the Space and Missile Systems Center, and of course, the NRO for pulling together to make this launch a success.”

This mission is the NRO’s third launch of 2020 and carried four payloads designed, built and operated by the agency.

“The NRO is committed to providing resiliency in our operations through diversified launch options, and the success of NROL-129 is the culmination of years of steadfast collaboration with our civilian, military and commercial space partners to help us achieve that commitment,” said U.S. Air Force Colonel Chad Davis, director of the NRO’s Office of Space Launch. “We have a long record of developing, delivering, launching and operating the world’s most advanced space collection systems and capabilities in support of national security, and we’re happy to add our first dedicated launch from the Virginia Space Coast to that history.”

The NRO’s next launch, NROL-44, is currently scheduled for August 2020 from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida.

-NRO-

The NRO is the Intelligence Community element and a Department of Defense agency responsible for developing, acquiring, launching, and operating America’s intelligence satellites to meet the national security needs of our nation.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### State, Respondent, vs. McAloon, Appellant.

*February 2*

February 22, *1910.*

*Criminal law: “Wilful” acts: Town orders: Unauthorised issuance: Penalty: Civil action.*

1. Tiie word “wilful” in. the criminal law involves evil intent or legal malice.

2. A civil action will lie to recover the forfeiture imposed by sec. 823, Stats. (1898), upon an officer issuing a town order without authority of the town hoard, at least if his act was not wilful.

[3. Whether sec. 4550, Stats. (1898), makes the wilful issuance of an unauthorized town order a misdemeanor, not determined.]

Appeal from an order of tbe circuit court for Douglas county: A. J. Votje, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

For the appellant the cause was submitted on the brief of *G. B. Fridley.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *William B. Foley,*district attorney, and *Bussell Jaclcson,*deputy attorney general, of counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Jaclcson.*

WiNslow, C. J.

This is a civil action by the state to recover the penalty denounced by sec. 823, Stats. (1898), against any chairman of a town board who issues a town order without authority of the town board. Upon general demurrer the claim is made by defendant that no civil action will lie for such penalty, but only a criminal action.

. The argument of the demurrant runs thus: By sec. 3294, Stats. (1898), forfeitures may be sued for and recovered in a civil action, provided the act for which the forfeiture is imposed be not also a misdemeanor, and, further, an act punishable by fine or imprisonment is a misdemeanor; by sec. 4550, Id., any town officer who wilfully violates any provision of law authorizing or requiring anything to be done or prohibiting anything from being done in his official capacity is to be punished by imprisonment not exceeding one year or *73by fine not exceeding $500: therefore the issuing of a town ■order without authority of the town board is a misdemeanor and cannot be recovered by civil action. This argument overlooks entirely the fact that the last-named section only punishes criminally the “wilful” violation of duty. In the criminal law “wilful” involves evil intent or legal malice. *Brown v.*State, 137 Wis. 543, 119 N. W. 338.

The forfeiture named in sec. 823, *supra,*is imposed upon an officer who issues a town order without legal authority, regardless of the fact whether the act be wilful, and the complaint does not charge the act to have been wilful in this case. Hence conceding, but not deciding, that sec. 4550 makes the wilful issuance of a town order a misdemeanor, it still does not apply to the act charged in this case, • and therefore that act is not a misdemeanor, and a civil action will lie to recover the forfeiture.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
----

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 808/2003 der Kommission vom 12. Mai 2003 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1774/2002 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates mit Hygienevorschriften für nicht für den menschlichen Verzehr bestimmte tierische Nebenprodukte

(Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 117 vom 13. Mai 2003)

Seite 4, Anhang, Punkt 4 Buchstabe a, neuer Punkt 1 Buchstabe b:

anstatt:

muss es heißen:

Seite 5, Anhang, Punkt 6 Buchstabe b Ziffer i:

anstatt:

muss es heißen:

anstatt:

muss es heißen:

Seite 6, Anhang, Punkt 6 Buchstabe b Ziffer iii:

anstatt:

muss es heißen:

anstatt:

„Werden in einer Biogas- oder Kompostanlage ... ausschließlich Gülle und vom Magen- und Darmtrakt getrennter Magen- und Darminhalt behandelt, kann die ...“

muss es heißen:

„Werden in einer Biogas- oder Kompostierungsanlage ... ausschließlich Gülle, vom Magen- und Darmtrakt getrennter Magen- und Darminhalt und Milch und Kolostrum behandelt, kann die ...“

----