alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 136 

AN ACT 

To amend chapter 21 of title 5, United States Code, to 

provide that fathers of certain permanently disabled or 

deceased veterans shall be included with mothers of such 

veterans as preference eligibles for treatment in the civil 

service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 136 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gold Star Fathers Act 

3 of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PREFERENCE ELIGIBLE TREATMENT FOR FATHERS 

5 OF CERTAIN PERMANENTLY DISABLED OR 

6 DECEASED VETERANS. 

7 Section 2108(3) of title 5, United States Code, is 

8 amended by striking subparagraphs (F) and (G) and in9 serting the following: 

10 ‘‘(F) the parent of an individual who lost 

11 his or her life under honorable conditions while 

12 serving in the armed forces during a period 

13 named by paragraph (1)(A) of this section, if— 

14 ‘‘(i) the spouse of that parent is to15 tally and permanently disabled; or 

16 ‘‘(ii) that parent, when preference is 

17 claimed, is unmarried or, if married, le18 gally separated from his or her spouse; 

19 ‘‘(G) the parent of a service-connected per20 manently and totally disabled veteran, if— 

21 ‘‘(i) the spouse of that parent is to22 tally and permanently disabled; or 

23 ‘‘(ii) that parent, when preference is 

24 claimed, is unmarried or, if married, le25 gally separated from his or her spouse; 

26 and’’. 
3 

†S 136 ES

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

2 The amendment made by this Act shall take effect 

3 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Passed the Senate May 11, 2015. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 136 

AN ACT 

To amend chapter 21 of title 5, United States 

erence eligibles for treatment in the civil service. cluded with mothers of such veterans as prefnently disabled or deceased veterans shall be inCode, to provide that fathers of certain perma-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1998
<CASH>                                         268,173
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     24,157
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               354,107
<PP&E>                                         318,795
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 681,402
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          326,607
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,232,005
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,883,210)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   681,402
<SALES>                                      1,202,456
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,202,456
<CGS>                                          362,116
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  362,116
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               790,864
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 211
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 49,265
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             49,265
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,265
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

HUNTERS POINT LAND TRUST, et al.,

Appellants,

v.

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, etc.,

Appellees.

No. 4D21-1796

[May 26, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Andrea Gundersen, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE20-

003734.

Thomas Neusom, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Eric S. Matthew of Fox McCluskey Bush Robison PLLC, Stuart, for 

appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, GERBER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2274 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2274

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Federal Power Act to provide for extended periods relating 
to preliminary permits and commencement of construction, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``HYdropower Permit Extension Act'' or 
the ``HYPE Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSIONS OF PERIODS.

    (a) Preliminary Permits.--Section 5 of the Federal Power Act (16 
U.S.C. 798) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``three'' and inserting 
        ``four''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking ``Commission may extend the period 
                of a preliminary permit once for not more than 2 
                additional years beyond the 3 years'' and inserting the 
                following: ``Commission may--
            ``(1) extend the period of a preliminary permit once for 
        not more than 4 additional years beyond the 4 years'';
                    (B) by striking the period at the end and inserting 
                ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) if the period of a preliminary permit is extended 
        under paragraph (1), extend the period of such preliminary 
        permit once for not more than 4 additional years beyond the 
        extension period granted under paragraph (1), if the Commission 
        determines that there are extraordinary circumstances that 
        warrant such additional extension.''.
    (b) Time Limit for Construction of Project Works.--Section 13 of 
the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) is amended in the second sentence 
by striking ``once but not longer than two additional years'' and 
inserting ``for not more than 8 additional years,''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 12, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2274

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Federal Power Act to provide for extended periods relating 
to preliminary permits and commencement of construction, and for other 
                               purposes.
```
Exhibit 8.1
 List of Subsidiaries of SK Telecom Co., Ltd.
(As of December 31, 2007)
 Subsidiary
Name
    

Jurisdiction
of IncorporationSK Telink Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaSK Communications Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaSK Wyverns Baseball Club Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaGlobal Credit & Information Corp.
    
    KoreaPAXNet Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaLoen Entertainment, Inc.
    
    KoreaIHQ, Inc.
    
    KoreaTU Media Corp.
    
    KoreaAirCross Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaNtreev Soft Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaCommerce Planet Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaThe First Music Investment Fund
of SK-PVC
    
    KoreaThe Second Music Investment Fund
of SK-PVC
    
    KoreaSK-KTB Music Investment Fund
    
    KoreaIMM Cinema Fund
    
    KoreaMichigan Global Cinema Fund
    
    KoreaSK i-media Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaYTN Media, Inc
    
    KoreaKonan Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaSK Telecom China Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaULand Company Limited
    
    China (Hong Kong)SKT Vietnam Pte., Ltd.
    
    SingaporeSK Telecom USA Holdings, Inc.
    
    United StatesHELIO Inc. & Helio LLC
    
    United StatesSK Telecom International Inc.
    
    United StatesSK Cyberpass, Inc.
    
    Japan
Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Object Design, Inc. on Form S-8 (file no. 333-14741) of our report dated
February 11, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Object Design, Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and
1995 and for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994 which report is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                                        COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Boston, Massachusetts
March 31, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>                    0001004539
<NAME>                   AIRPLANES LIMITED
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                              229
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        35
<ALLOWANCES>                                         12
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    251
<PP&E>                                            4,365
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1,124
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3,536
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               162
<BONDS>                                           3,901
<COMMON>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (1,065)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3,536
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    134
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        67
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     11
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      1
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   92
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (33)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (32)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (32)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1





WRITTEN
STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





The
undersigned, Deborah C. Wright, is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Carver Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”).





This
statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008 (the
“Report”).





By
execution of this statement, I certify that:





a)
            the Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));
and





b)
            the information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
      periods covered by the
Report.





July 1,
      2008
            /s/ Deborah C. WrightDated
            Deborah
      C. Wright





This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
# C_2005042EN.01002902.xml

| 18.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/29

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3676 — Warburg/Providence/Telcordia)

(2005/C 42/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 25 January 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3676. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3676. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
411P-SECIET- APRs, .T.

THE NRO STAFF .

-*NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C. WZMICIZIEMION

20 June 1973

•

MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, NRO PROGRAM A44---ern •

DIRECTOR, CIA RECONNAISSANCE; PROG

DIRECTOR, NRO PROGRAM C

SUBJECT: SIGINT 5-Year. Plan

Annually, the USIB issues Guidance for the National. 

Reconnaissance SIGINT Program. This guidance addresses'`-

forthcoming five year period with emphasis on the next fiscal

year. The 5-Year Plan is the official intelligence. requirements basis for NRP SIGINT .programs. A copy of the current

document covering FY-1974 through FY-1978 with approving notes

is enclosed.

I believe that your comments on the 5-Year Plan will be

highly valuable in formulating future NRP actions and in

assisting USIB preparation "of next year's guidance. Due to

its late receipt, the current plan will have little formal

impact on the FY-1974 NRP. However, we maintained close con-

.tact with USIB during the drafting of the 5-Year Plan and,

insofar as possible, considered the requirements in developing

the FY-1974 budget. I will press for timely issuance of next

year's guidance.

It is, requested that you review the attached plan to:

a. identify those specific requirements which your

current programs are fulfilling either in whole or in part;

b: identify those specific requirements which you

believe could be satisfied by additions or modification to

current programs or by developing new programs; and

•

c. suggest specific improvements in content, format,

or removal of ambiguities in next year's 5-Year Plan. .

e

%BC

o APs

ision new VV 0

. .. . .

I swam 110001A!10 . !

c IA 0011, NO 00KAINOPV GUMP Olt ....."Prell:GEE

10110MOt MOOR MOO azamptHow un- cpA00:1 0:

. a
Brigadier General, USAF

Director

--TOP-SHREI-

.

.Please keep in mind that the 5-Year Plan contains specific

requirements for the collecting, processing, and reporting of

SIGINT data. The research and development sections, however,

are oriented to general guidance and do not involve the same

level of commitment as the specific requirements.

•

Your preliminary comments on items a and b are desired

by 15 July. Final comments on all three items are desired

by 15 SepteMber. Your comments and those from other program

offices will be consolidated and considered in future program

actions.

It is not proposed that you accomplish the above by assigning a study omutract and releasing the 5-Year Plan to either

government or civilian contractors. 'Rather, it is. proposed

that a small scale internal, staff study be done.

1

. 1 attachment

5-Year Plan, FY 74-78,

•

•

.1 •. :.'• :!•• •• 1• 1"• :: : •. '

0.•

! • 1 • • ' ' : • • •

: . •• :

•• 

. • • : • :•,. 

.

o' ' •:. ,;!...' • t• •

. .... . .

o'.

!; . •• ,' I • : • 8 •

.0i

. • . •

•

. • . • • . ...•

.

CLASIM010111111111 11 : I . 0 620

2111111. OVIOUOVIII OMR IOU 1111a0MION ChM

001IF Mt OLOLAIIIIIFF ON SIP Oat •

. 

PAGE „i,...OF „,2&,„,., PAO

4 0511111AL COPY OF COM OF -1111)--SECRE

ODUTROLNO

F " .

•

•

. . . . , . .

•

.

.
99-1297.

#### State v. Eubanks.

Cuyahoga App. No. 73421. On motion for leave.to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The
      Board
      of Directors


Carver
      Bancorp, Inc.:





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the annual report on Form 10-K
      of
      Carver Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated June 29, 2007 relating
      to the consolidated statements of financial condition of Carver Bancorp, Inc.
      and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated
      statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income,
      and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31,
      2007, which report appears in the March 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K
      of
      Carver Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries.








KPMG
      LLP


New
      York,
      New York


June
      29,
      2007
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2241 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat qualified alternative 

commuter programs as an excludable qualified transportation fringe benefit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2017 

Mr. HOLDING (for himself and Mr. MEEHAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat qualified alternative commuter programs as an excludable 

qualified transportation fringe benefit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Commuter Access Re5 form Act’’. 

2 

•HR 2241 IH

1 SEC. 2. QUALIFIED ALTERNATIVE COMMUTER PROGRAMS 

2 TREATED AS AN EXCLUDABLE QUALIFIED 

3 TRANSPORTATION FRINGE BENEFIT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 132(f)(1) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

6 the following: 

7 ‘‘(E) Any qualified alternative commuter 

8 transportation service.’’. 

9 (b) APPLICATION OF DOLLAR LIMITATION.—Section 

10 132(f)(2)(B) of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘quali11 fied parking’’ and inserting ‘‘the aggregate of the benefits 

12 described in subparagraphs (C) and (E) of paragraph 

13 (1)’’. 

14 (c) QUALIFIED ALTERNATIVE COMMUTER TRANS15 PORTATION SERVICE.—Section 132(f)(5) of such Code is 

16 amended by adding at the end the following: 

17 ‘‘(G) QUALIFIED ALTERNATIVE COMMUTER

18 TRANSPORTATION SERVICE.— 

19 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘quali20 fied alternative commuter transportation 

21 service’ means transportation in a com22 muter vehicle provided by a transportation 

23 network company if such transportation— 

24 ‘‘(I) is designed to provide pre25 arranged rides to passengers who conVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:33 May 04, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2241.IH H2241
3 

•HR 2241 IH

1 sent to share the ride in whole or in 

2 part, and 

3 ‘‘(II) such transportation is be4 tween the employee’s residence, place 

5 of employment, or a mass transit fa6 cility, including any portion of the dis7 tance between an employee’s resi8 dence, place of employment, or mass 

9 transit. 

10 ‘‘(ii) TRANSPORTATION NETWORK

11 COMPANY.—The term ‘transportation net12 work company’ means a corporation, part13 nership, sole proprietorship, or other entity 

14 that uses a digital network to connect rid15 ers to drivers affiliated with the entity in 

16 order for a driver to transport the rider 

17 using a vehicle owned, leased, or otherwise 

18 authorized for use by the driver to a point 

19 chosen by the rider. 

20 ‘‘(iii) COMMUTER VEHICLE.—The 

21 term ‘commuter vehicle’ means a vehicle 

22 the seating capacity (not including the 

23 driver) of which is at least four and not 

24 more than six.’’. 

4 

•HR 2241 IH

1 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to transportation provided after 

3 December 31, 2017. 

Æ
• • a•ammel

HEADQUARTERS

AIR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COMMAND

UNITED STATES AO POKE

Asirrara Alt P km

someimpfte 23.0. C.

wimmumwm

commwmemscam

lark_ 3 November 1959

MEMDRANDUM FOR GENERAL sanozna•

To the best of my knowledge, the purpose of today's meeting is to

question you about two basic matters in connection with SANDS. The first

question is whether or not the data link, electronic read-out, and

associated ground processing equipment can sake available suitable photos

before 1970. In other words, is there a justification to continue the

SAMOS program (subsystem' 2 sad i) in the RID phase for an extended period

of time. The second qua ted to the value of subsystem F.

The argument here is elint and commint can be available

via aircraft peripheral

The attendance in.this meeting are to be Dr. Land o Dr. Billings, Dr.

York, Dr. York, Dr. Charyk, and you. My information has it that Dr.

Land has raised most of these questions.

3. I would recommend the following:

That you point out the numerous reviews that have already been

conducted to justify the existing confidence in the present program.

That we can't stand another readjustment in the program without

inducing fUrther delays to accomplish operational capability.

c. If a further reviewer the SAMOS program is desired that it be

deferred until after the AF completes its current effort to submit

development plans on SAMOS, MIDAS, DISCOVERSB.

NORMAN C. APPOLD

Colonel, USAF

Special Asst. for ARPA/NASA Affairs