alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03093]



[[Page 8333]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, March 10, 2015, 8:00 a.m. to 
March 10, 2015, 6:00 p.m., Residence Inn Bethesda, 7335 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814 which was published in the Federal Register 
on February 9, 2015, 80 FR 7004.
    The meeting date has changed to April 14, 2015. The meeting time 
and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: February 10, 2015.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-03093 Filed 2-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
•

•

WI NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

July 10, 1972

8' II.

•

THE NRO STAFF

•

COMIlli Internal TOP SECRET mums ISOM imam immassus

mN wasorn saa es ens an am.

COMM awns

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. Mc LUCAS

SUBJECT:. Letter of Appointment

The letter at the right has been pre

a.

of command link between you and Colonel Bailey.

en

RECOMMENDATION: That you sign the letter at the right.

•

Captain, USAF
rug a.ie 4014447

.

Agegoi4e 'Au

84c. .44"

:•••

Se

•

..1.s; • •

/41 Y4'44t

14e914"efigiff.

• • ' ••• •••• %-••••• n.- ••• e . • : • : • . •

. • •

4 • • • • .

_ .

. • •

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR IRRCE

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM

a .4

Adt Ow. C".0.8644-Ce

/ 4114%C. eoPOwiala' .014014464101•

fagot attec.

144.0 44edifif

c-84.‘ .44‘44, •••&;:‘

•jf Y'461 ~4.1 444eid.‘ 4451drer • ymt.+ 41016114 .080.11011104 .

.04'704.4
--TOP-SECREFIldavele •l** •IN•ht

INICIf•ll IR 00 'S NIS N. &NI,

CANN' S.

ON.a INNS

• •. • —Er-sEcto--- •

J.8(NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON, D.C.

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR

MEMORANDUM FOR COLONEL BERNARD L. BAILEY, AFIGJ

SUBJECT: Appointment

You are hereby appointed Director, National Reconnaissance

Office, Program D.

I believe that your past experience within the Program D

Office will be a definite asset to you as Director, Program D,

and I trust that your knowledge of the other projects within

the National Reconnaissance Program will assist you in

maintaining adequate coordination with these activities

through Colonel Bradburn and the NRO Staff.

I am pleased to welcome you to your new position and

look forward to working with you.

John L. MC Lucas
o

•

ir

„ ,101 .,

1111fr

d#1e&-Nr

ploC-0‘4-

714-w-sCt

••

. •

•

. .1

•

•
-4-1, A 4-Lt411

•

te • •

C. •

: •
. •

. •••

. : . `.***•-

. •

:••• ••. • ,A7••••• • •

• RETURN TO

FILE

SICUATURE

APPROVAL

CONSIETS

cooRDnancw

INFORMATION

FOR YOUR:

Date:

•-: •

SUBJECT: 1-446 

ritn4 

. • .

".:,.."•to r " of •••

•

f•

. •

: .

. .

••4 1.

By

YOUR COMENTS/DIRECTION:

1"7'''2":••••r: r.V111.2

fal) .

....:.

•

•

SU MI SRI UM OND

•

'Is •• ••

•••12:1: t•

• '•

:.%4•• •
!'ile.q:3' • ... 4.

J..

... t . .W

' .1 .. 1 •1` '

, . ... .. .r.

- • • ..« ; •••n2 • • • , . r• • :••.•• r • , .". 4.; • ;.,zoi:A.

oP2::-

.

.

.

• • 71'.... • ......" Jr
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1



                           STATEMENT UNDER SECTION 906
                                     OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         The undersigned hereby certifies as of the March 31, 2003 to the UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, as follows:

         1.       The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Intelligent Systems
Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 which accompanies this
statement fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       Information contained in such quarterly report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Intelligent Systems Corporation.



Date: May 15, 2003                           /s/ J. Leland Strange
                                             -----------------------
                                             J. Leland Strange
                                             Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Intelligent Systems Corporation and will be retained by Intelligent
Systems Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 01-4924



# 
J OSEPH M ORIARITY ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington.

James C. Fox, Senior District Judge.

(CR-01-118) Submitted: July 26, 2002 Decided: August 8, 2002 Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, G. Alan DuBois, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Jane E. Pearce, Research andWriting Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION
PER CURIAM: Joseph Moriarity pled guilty to conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2000) in the Western District of Pennsylvania. He was sentenced to twenty-four months probation in May 2001. The district court subsequently transferred jurisdiction to the Eastern District of North Carolina and expressly consented to that district’s ability to change Moriarity’s period of probation or supervised release. While on probation, Moriarity failed to abide by the conditions of the community corrections center in which he was housed, and failed to abstain from the use of alcohol. The district court revoked Moriarity’s probation and sentenced Moriarity to twelve months imprisonment to be followed by a thirty-six month term of supervised release. Moriarity’s counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), addressing whether the district court abused its discretion by sentencing Moriarity to twelve months imprisonment,but stating that in his opinion there were no meritorious issues. Moriarity has submitted a pro se supplemental brief addressing the same issue. Under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.4 (2000), Moriarity’s guidelines range was six to twelve months. Moreover, he was subject to a maximum term of supervised release of thirty-six months. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(b)(2) (2000). Finding no abuse of discretion in the sentence, we affirm. United States v. Davis , 53 F.3d 638, 642-43 (4th Cir. 1995) (providing standard of review). As required by Anders , we have examined the entire record and find no other meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further 2 U NITED S TATES v. M ORIARITYreview. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel maymove in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 3 U NITED S TATES v. M ORIARITY
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 69

/

6

8

6

8

-

3A8 

11,141-131111M1 IY441!*11 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE rEgfej 

MANNED ORBITING LABORATORY, SYSTEMS PROGRAM OFFICE (OSAF) 

AF UNIT POST OFFICE, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90045 

OFFS 

MMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, PROCUREMENT & PRODUCTION, MOL 

SUBJECT: Redelegation of Procurement Authority 

Colonel Fred H. Dietrich, FR13671, vice Colonel John A. 

Murphy, FR34463, is vested with those redelegable DORIAN 

procurement authorities now assigned to the Deputy Director, 

MOL, by 22 March 1968 letter from the Assistant Director, 

NOL (Procurement). Under this authority, the Director, 

Procurement and Production, MOL, may enter into, approve 

and take other actions as required in respect to contracts, 

change orders, supplemental agreements, awards, letter contracts, leases, and amendments of contractual instruments. 

NOTE: Secretary of Air Force approval must be acquired 

before entering into new MOL DORIAN contracts with industry. 

This authority is limited to those individual contractual actions having a value of $350,000.00 or less. 

Further redelegation is not authorized. 

This action voids 19 March'1968 letter, same subject. 

S. IER 

Major General, USAF 

Deputy Director, MOL 

APPIOVED: 

, r Major Gen 4, USAF 

Assistant Director, MOL 

(Procurement) 

4/e- ?q`.5---P6 9 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM ONLY -sEGRETDORIAN
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5828-N-08]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Juanita Perry, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 402-3970; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: February 12, 2015.

Brian P. Fitzmaurice,

Director, Division of Community Assistance, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.

[FR Doc. 2015-03365 Filed 2-19-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1361 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1361

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend and improve the 
                   Indian coal production tax credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 2015

 Mr. Daines (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Tester, Mr. Moran, and Ms. 
   Heitkamp) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend and improve the 
                   Indian coal production tax credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT OF INDIAN COAL PRODUCTION TAX 
              CREDIT.

    (a) Repeal of Limitation Based on Date Facility Is Placed in 
Service.--Section 45(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 
to read as follows:
            ``(10) Indian coal production facility.--The term `Indian 
        coal production facility' means a facility that produces Indian 
        coal.''.
    (b) Repeal of Limitation on Period During Which Coal Must Be 
Produced and Sold; Treatment of Sales to Related Parties.--Section 
45(e)(10)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by 
striking ``per ton of Indian coal--'' and all that follows and 
inserting the following: ``per ton of Indian coal--
                            ``(i) produced by the taxpayer at an Indian 
                        coal production facility, and
                            ``(ii) sold (either directly by the 
                        taxpayer or after sale or transfer to one or 
                        more related persons) to an unrelated 
                        person.''.
    (c) Repeal of Limitation on Treatment as a Specified Credit.--
            (1) In general.--Section 38(c)(4)(B) of the Internal 
        Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating clauses (iv) 
        through (ix) as clauses (v) through (x), respectively, and by 
        inserting after clause (iii) the following new clause:
                            ``(iv) the credit determined under section 
                        45 to the extent that such credit is 
                        attributable to section 45(e)(10) (relating to 
                        Indian coal production facilities),''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 45(e)(10) of such Code 
        is amended by striking subparagraph (D).
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to coal produced and sold after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, in taxable years ending after such date.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS



I, Kenneth W. Brimmer, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB/A of Sterion Incorporated;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.





August 19, 2004

/s/ Kenneth W. Brimmer

Kenneth W. Brimmer

Chief Executive Officer
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 17

- 15182 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:15

- cr - 00165

- ODE

- LTW

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus JORGE MATURANO

- MARIN, a.k.a. Jorge Maturano,
Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________ (November 26, 2018) Before WILSON , JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON , Circuit Judges.
PER C URIAM:

Case: 17-15182 Date Filed: 11/26/2018 Page: 1 of 22 John Lovell , appointed counsel for Jorge Maturano

- Marin in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent re view of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Marin ’s conv iction and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

Case: 17-15182 Date Filed: 11/26/2018 Page: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<CIK>                    0000350194
<NAME>                   United Systems Technology, Inc.

<S>                      <C>               <C>          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS          3-MOS       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>        DEC-31-1999    DEC-31-1998   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>             MAR-31-1999    MAR-31-1998   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                        802680              0        478008
<SECURITIES>                       0              0             0
<RECEIVABLES>                 229170              0        329708
<ALLOWANCES>                       0              0             0
<INVENTORY>                        0              0             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             1031850              0        807716
<PP&E>                         75398              0         65329
<DEPRECIATION>                 29632          31075        130243
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               1503927              0       1325138
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         972703              0       1123498
<BONDS>                        22915              0         27083
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0              0             0
<PREFERRED>                   130000              0        130000
<COMMON>                     4817804              0       4817804
<OTHER-SE>                         0              0             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 1503927              0       1325138
<SALES>                       169962          97943             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              518279         425831             0
<CGS>                          40227          31975             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 425088         376104             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                6914           1433             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0              0             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               502           1126             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    0              0             0
<INCOME-TAX>                       0              0             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                0              0             0
<DISCONTINUED>                     0              0             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0              0             0
<CHANGES>                          0              0             0
<NET-INCOME>                  100105          51160             0
<EPS-BASIC>                      0              0             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0              0             0


</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

# Year in Review

HomeCybersecurityYear in Review

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Document Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Full Size (0.47 MB)

Tags:NSA Historical Photographs, HIST-003-001

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
----

            DECISION No 207

of 7 April 2006         

concerning the interpretation of Article 76 and Article 79(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 and of Article 10(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 relating to the overlapping of family benefits and allowances

(Text of relevance to the EEA and to the EU/Switzerland Agreement)

(2006/442/EC)

THE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ON SOCIAL SECURITY FOR MIGRANT WORKERS,

Having regard to Article 81(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (1), under the terms of which it is responsible for dealing with any administrative question arising from Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 and subsequent Regulations,

Having regard to Articles 76 and 79(3) of the said Regulation and to Article 10(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 (2),

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

The Chairman of the Administrative Commission

Bernhard SPIEGEL            

----

(1)OJ L 149, 5.7.1971, p. 2. Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No 629/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 114, 27.4.2006, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 74, 27.3.1972, p. 1. Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No 629/2006.

(3)  Judgment of 7 June 2005 in case C-543/03, ‘            Dodl and Oberhollenzer/Tiroler Gebietskrankenkasse’.

----