•lzulos 

7.03 

2008 
8ta.tion• Source Sampl•g R•port 

Triangl• Brlek Company 

Wades•ro• NC 

Trigon Project Noel 046-05.011 

March 2005 
STATIONARY SOURCE SAMPLING REPORT 

FOR 

TRIANGLE ]].RICK COMPANY 

WADESBORO• NORTH CAROLINA 

Brick Kiln Exhaust 

(K-2) 

P•rformed by: 

Trigon Engineering-Consultants, Inc. 6200 Harris Technology Boulevard Charlotte, North Carolina 

704.598.1049 

Trigon Project No. 046-05-011 

March 2005 
StatiOnary Source Sampling, Triangle Brick Company Brick Kiln Exhaust, Wadesboro, North Carolina April 22, 2005 

Trigon Project No. 046-05-011 

REPORT CERTIFICATION 

by 

This report, the testing details, and the lrmal results have been performed under the supervision and reviewed the 

shall 

persons named below. Results contained in this report relate only to the items tested. This report not be reproduced in full or in part without the written consent of Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. 

Matthew J. Graham 

Project Manager 

Air Monitoring Department 

Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. 

Date Signature. 

Signature 

Paul R. Jenkins, Jr. 

Department Manager 

Air Monitoring Department 

Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. 

Fmnldin M. Stevens 

Operations Manager 

Air Monitoring Department 

Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. 

TRIGON ENGINEI•RING CONSULTANTS, 1NC. LELAC CERTIFICATE NO. 04036 Page 2 of 17 
S¢•tionary Source Sampling, Triangle Brick Company April 22, 2005 Brick Kiln Exhaust, Wadesboro, North Carolina Trigon Project No. 046-05-011 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................... 4 1.2 Outline of Test Program ...................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Test Participants .................................................................................................................. 5 

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION 6 2,1 Discn•sion, 

Figure 1 Process Air Flow Schematic ................................................................................ 7 

3.0 SAMPLING METHODS ............................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Sampling Strategy ............................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Sampling and Analytical Procedures .................................................................................. 8 3.2.1 Sampling Ports, Traverse Points and Cyclonic Flow Determination 8 3.2.2 Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate Determination 8 3.2.3 Dry Molecular Weight Determination ................................................................... 9 3.2.4 Moisture Determination ....................................................................................... 10 3.2.5 Particulate, Visible Emission, Hydrogen Chloride and Hydrogen Fluoride 

Sampling ................................................. 10 3.2.6 Location of Sampling Ports and Points ................................................. 12 Figure 2 Location of Sampling Ports and Points ................................................. 13 3.3 Quality Assurance and Quality Control ............................................................................ 14 

4.0 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................... 16 4.1 Summary of Results 16 4.2 Discussion 

5.0 APPENDICES .............................................................................................................................. 17 Number of Pages in the Appendices 161 

A. Summary of Results and Example Calculations 

B. Field Data Sheets 

C. Laboratory Data 

D. Production Documentation 

E. Calibration Data 

TRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. LELAC CERTIFICATE NO. 04036 Page 3 of 17 
S['ationary Source Sampling, Triangle Brick Company April 22, 2005 Brick Kiln Exhaust, Wadesboro, North Carolina Trigon Project No. 046-05-01l 

1.0 INTRODUCTION 

This section describes the purpose, a brief outline including the sampling and analytical strategy, and the 

personnel involved in the test program. 

1.1 Purpose 

The purpose of this sampling project was to quantify particulate matter, hydrogen chloride, and hydrogen 

fluoride emission rates from one Brick Kiln Exhaust (ID No. K-2) located-at the Triangle Brick Company 

manufacturing facility in Wadesboro, North Carolina. The results of the sampling and the documentation 

provided in this report will be used to determine compliane with Air Permit Number 08179T05 issued by 

the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NC DEN-R). 

1.2 Outline of Test Program 

Stationary source sampling was performed March 24, 2005 bythe Air Monitoring Department of Trigon 

Engineering Consultants, Inc. Three 90-minute sampling runs were conducted for particulate, HCI and I-IF, 

and three 60 minute runs were conducted for visible emissions. The sampling runs were conducted during 

normal production and operating conditions. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) 

Methods 1 through 4 and 5 were used for the determination of particulate matter concentrations and 

emissions rates. Method 9 was used for determination of visible emissions and Method 26A was used for 

the determination of hydrogen chloride and hydrogen fluoride concentrations and emission rates. The 

sampling and analytical procedures used in this test program were those established by the US EPA in 

standard reference test methods and appropriate sampling and analytical procedures. 

TRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. LELAC CERTIFICATE NO. 04036 Page 4 of 17 
Stationary Source Sampling, Triangle Brick Company 

Brick Kiln Exhaust, lYadesboro, North Carolina April 22. 2005 

Trigon Project No. 046-05-011 

1.3 Test Participants 

A list of the project participants, titles, affiliation and telephone numbers can be found below. 

Participant 

Matthew J Graham 

Larry E. Reynolds 

Joshua Jones 

Howard P. Brown 

William G. Colby, P.E. 

Robert P. Kennedy 

Title 

Project Manager 

Environmental 

Sc,.'enfist 

Environmental 

Scientist 

Plant Manager 

President 

Environmental 

Engineer 

Affiliation Contact 

Tdgon Engineedng 

Consultants, Inc. 

Trigon Engineering 

Trigon Engineering 

Consultants, Inc. 

Triangle Brick 

Company 

Colby Engineering & 

Consulting 

NCDENR 

Department of Air 

Quality 

Telephone: (704) 598-1049 

Facsimile: (704) 598-1050 

Telephone: (704) 695-1420 

Facsimile: (704) 695-1470 

Telephone." (860) 491,2066 

Facsimile: (860) 491-2211 

Telephone: (910) 486-1541 

Facsimile: (910) 486-0707 

TRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. LELAC CERTIFICATE NO. 04036 Page 5 of 17 
Sbationary Source Sampling, Triangle Brick Company April 22, 2005 Brick Kiln Exhaust, Wadesboro, North Carolina Trigon Project No. 046-05-011 

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION 

This section contains a brief description of the brick kiln, the control devices and an air flow schematic. 

2.1 Discussion 

Triangle Brick operates a natural gas fwed kiln at its facility •ades•ro, North Carolina. A sixteen car 

shuttle is conveyed .through the kiln yielding approximat•lS/--'/•• of bricks fired. Flue gases are 

withdrawn from the gas-fred tunnel through a scrubber Pan,_and-•tack to the atmosphere. Figure 1 details 

the air flow schematic. 

Production data was recorded by Triangle Brick personnel and is presented in Appendix D. 

TRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. LELAC CERTIFICATE NO. 04036 Page 6 of 17 
Stationary Source Sampling, Triangle Brick Company April 22, 2005 

Brick Kiln Exhaust, Wadesboro, North Carolina Trigon Project No. 046-05-011 

Brick Kiln Exhaust 

Atmosphere 

Stack •-Sampling Location 

I.D. Fan 

Scrubber 

Kiln No. 2 

Figure 1 

Process Air Flow Schematic 

TRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. LELAC CERTIFICATE NO. 04036 Page 7 of 17 
Stationary Source Sampling, Triangle Brick Company April 22, 2005 Brick Kiln Exhaust, Wadesboro, North Carolina Trigon Project No. 046-05-011 

3.0 SAMPLING METHODS 

This section describes the sampling strategy, sampling and analytical methods, and quality assurance/quality 

control procedures implemented during this project. 

3.1 Sampling Strategy 

The sampling and analytical procedures used during this test program were those established by the US 

EPA and NC DENR. Sampling runs were conducted in triplicate to validate the sampling. Tests were 

conducted during normal operating conditions. 

3.2 Sampling and Analytical Procedures 

The US EPA methods used in this sampling program were Method 1 for the location of sampling ports and 

points, and determination of cyclonic flow, Method 2 for volumetric flow rate determination, Method 3 for 

the determination of dry molecular weight of the stack gas, Method 4 for the determination of moisture in 

the stack gas, Method 5 for the determination of particulate matter, Method 9 for determination of visible 

emissions and Method 26A for the determination of hydrogen chloride and hydrogen fluoride. A sampling 

and analysis synopsis for these methods is discussed briefly in the following subsections. These test 

methods are available in the Code of Federal Regulations Volume 40, Part 60 or by request from Trigon. 

3.2.1 Sampling Ports, Traverse Points and Cyclonic Flow Determination 

The sampling locations were prepared according to the criteria in Method 1. The duct diameters upstream 

and downstream from the sampling ports were determined prior to sampling. The number of traverse points 

were chosen with respect to sampling port location. For particulate traverses Method 1 specifies a minimum 

of 8 traverse points for sampling ports located >8/>2 downstream/upstream stack diameters from flow 

disturbances and 24 traverse points when located >2/>0.5. The amount of cyclonic flow was determined 

according to the criteria detailed in Method 1. 

3.2.2 Stack Ga's Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate Determination 

Method 2 is used for determining the average gas velocity in a stack from measurements of gas density and 

the average velocity head with a Type S (Stausscheibe or reverse type) pitot tube. This method is applicable 

for quantifying gas flows which meet the criteria of Method 1. 

TRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. LELAC CERTIFICATE NO. 04036 Page 8 of 17 
Stationary Source Sampling, Triangle Brick Company April 22, 2005 

Brick Kiln Exhaust, Wadesboro, North Carolina Trigon Project No. 046-05-011 

In principle, measurements of velocity head and temperature are performed at the traverse points specified 

by Method 1. A properly scaled differential pressure gauge was selected for the range of Ap values 

encountered during the traverse. A 0 10 inches of water inclined manometer was used. as the differential 

pressure gauge. 

During this project, the sampling location met the criteria detailed in Method 1. Gas stream density was 

determined by Method 3. Moisture determination was performed by Method 4. The principal components 

of the gas velocity measurement system were sequentially: 

• A calibrated stainless steel Type S pitot tube and Type K thermoeouple; 

• Leak'-free interface tubing betwee.n pitot tube and differential pressure gauge; 

• A 0 to I 0 inch inclined manometer; and 

• An NIST traceable pyrometer. 

The apparatus was set-up according to manufacturer and reference method recommendations. Pre-test and 

post-test leak checks were conducted using procedures outlined in Method 2, Section 3.1. Velocity head and 

temperature measurements were performed at the traverse points specified by Method 1. The atmospheric 

and static pressure of the stack was also determined for the velocity head readings. The volumetric flow 

rate calculations used were those specified in Method 2, Section 5. A more comprehensive explanation of 

the reference method is detailed in the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement 

Systems: Volume lII, EPA/600/R-94/038c, (QA Handbook) FieMProcedure 2. 

3.2.3 Dry Molecular Weight Determination 

Method 3 is applicable for determining carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations and dry molecular weight 

of a sample from a gas stream of a fossil-fuel combustion process. This method may also be applicable to 

other processes where it has been determined that compounds other than carbon dioxide, oxygen, carbon 

monoxide, and nitrogen are not present in concentrations sufficient to affect the results. 

In principle a gas sample was withdrawn from the emission source by multi-point, integrated sampling. The 

collected sample was then analyzed for percent carbon dioxide, percent oxygen, and percent carbon 

monoxide. The dry molecular weight determination was performed by an Orsat analyzer. 

TRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. LELAC CERTIFICATE NO. 04036 Page 9 of 17 
Stationary Source Sampling, Triangle Brick Company April 22, 2005 

Brick Kiln Exhaust, [["adesboro, North Carolina Trigon Project No. 046-05-011 

During this project, the gaseous components were collected using a Method 3 sampling system following 

the Analytical Procedures outlined in the reference method. 

system were sequentially: 

• 

• 

• 

• 

The principal components of the sampling 

A stainless steel probe; 

A one-way squeeze bulb, to transport the sample to the Tedlar bag; 

A saturator tube to remove particulate matter and excess moisture and; 

A leak-free Tedlar bag equipped with a double-end shut-offquick connect. 

collection. The dry molecular weight was calculated using Equation 3-1, Section 7 of Method 3. The 

analyzer was maintained and operated according to the instructions recommended by the manufacturer and 

in accordance with Method 3 criteria. The analyzer was leak-checked according to Section 6 of Method 3. 

The oxygen reagent was validated by analyzing a sample of ambient air which must meet the specifications 

of20.9°A + 0.3%. 

3.2.4 Moisture Determination 

Method 4 involves the determination of stack gas moisture. The moisture content is used to correct the 

emission concentration or mass emission rate to a dry basis. EPA Method 4 and Field Procedure 4 of the 

QA Handbook was used to measure stack gas moisture content. Field Procedure 4 provides detailed 

information on the application of Method 4. 

The moisture content for emission rate calculations was determined in conjunction with the Method 26A 

isokinetic sampling train. The reference method involves the withdrawal of gaseous pollutants from the 

emission source at an isokinetic rate using a Method 26A sampling system. The sampling and analytical 

procedure for reference Method 4 will be discussed in detail in Section 3.2.6 with the isokinetic sampling 

procedures. 

3.2.5 Visual Determination of Opacity 

Method 9 involves the determination of stack plume opacity by an individual properly trained and certified 

in performing visual emission observations. Opacity is the degree to which light or an image is obscured 

when viewed through a plume. The observers responsibility is to determine the degree to which light is 

TPdGON ENGINEERfNG CONSULTANTS, 1NC. LELAC CERTIFICATE NO. 04036 Page 10 of 17 
Stationary Source Sampling, Triangle Brick Company April 22, 2005 Brick Kiln Exhaust, Wadesboro, North Carolina Trigon Project No. 046-05-011 

obscured to the nearest 5% increment of opacity. Instantaneous readings are made every 15 seconds and the 

value recorded on the appropriate form. When making visual emission determinations the observer must 

apply specific criteria to the source layout in order to eliminate any bias which exerts a significant influence 

upon plume appearance. These variables include: 

• Angle of the observer with respect to the plume; 

• Angle of the observer with respect to the sun; 

• Point of observation of attached and detached steam plume and; 

• Angle of the observer with respect to a plume emitted from a rectangular stack with a large 

length to width ratio. 

A set of opacity data reduction calculations is def'med as the average of any 24 consecutive 15 second 

observations. Sets need not be consecutive in time and in no case shall two sets overlap. The highest sixminute average of a 60 minute test is recorded on the field data sheet. 

3.2.6 Particulate, Hydrogen Chloride and Hydrogen Fluoride Sampling and Analysis 

Testing for particulate matter, hydrogen chloride, and hydrogen fluoride was performed according to EPA 

Method 26A. Gaseous and particulate pollutants were withdrawn isokinetically from the emission source 

and collected in a multi-component sampling train. In principle, particulate matter that was condensed at or 

above the filtration temperature of approximately 250 degrees Fahrenheit was collected on a tared quartz 

filter. The gaseous components were then bubbled through a measured volume of 0.1N sulfuric acid and 

0.1N sodium hydroxide to determine the moisture along with the hydrogen chloride and hydrogen fluoride 

content of the emission source. The principal components of the sampling system were sequentially: 

• A borosilicate glass sample nozzle and probe liner; 

• A heated (248°F +25°F) probe and filter assembly with quartz media filter; 

• An impinger train consisting of five sequential impingers. Impingers one and two containing 

100 ml each of an absorbing solution consisting of dilute sulfuric acid (0.1N H2SO4). The third 

impinger was left empty. Impinger four contained 100 ml of dilute sodium hydroxide (0.1N 

NaOH) followed by a final impinger containing 200 grams of silica gel; and 

• A metering system capable of maintaining an isokinetic sampling rate and accurately 

determining the sample volume according to those specifications in APTD-0581. 

TRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. LELAC CERTIFICATE NO. 04036 Page 11 of 17 
Sta:tionary Source Sampling, Triangle Brick Company April 22, 2005 

Brick Kiln Exhaust, Wadesboro, North Carolina Trigon Project No. 046-05-011 

Sample clean up began immediately after the test run. Hydrogen chloride and hydrogen fluoride were 

collected in the 0.1N sulfuric acid solution in impingers one and two. The liquid in these, impingers was 

measured to the nearest milliliter and recorded in order to determine the moisture content. The collected 

sample was placed in a high-density polyethylene (HDPE) storage container along with the deionized water 

rinse of impingers one and two and connecting glassware. The container was sealed and the liquid level 

was marked. The 0.1N sodium hydroxide solution in impingers three and four was measured to further 

determine the moisture content and stored at Trigon for potential further analysis of halogens. The moisture 

collected by the silica gel in the fifth impinger was determined to the nearest 0.1 gram. Collected 

condensate measurements were recorded on the "moisture determination and sample recovery data analysis" 

form. The samples were then transported to Enthalpy Analytical, Inc., Durham, North Carolina with chain 

of custody documentation where they were analyzed by ion chromatography. Chain of custody 

documentation, quantitation data, and sample specific narratives are provided in Appendix C. 

The filter, which collected the sample, was carefully removed from the Teflon filter support and 

sealed in a petri dish. The nozzle, probe liner, and front filter-half of the filter assembly were rinsed with 

acetone into a glass storage container, which was sealed, and the liquid level marked. The sample 

containers were transported to Trigon's Air Quality Laboratory in Charlotte, North Carolina for particulate 

matter analysis. 

The particulate matter analyses began by transferring the acetone samples to tared beakers. These 

samples were taken to dryness, and then placed in a desiccator along with the filters for an initial drying 

period of 24 hours. The particulate mass was determined gravimetrically. The tare weights of the filters 

and beakers were subtracted from the final weights to determine the gross particulate weight. 

3.2.7 Location of Sampling Ports and Points 

Method 1 sampling criteria was maintained. The stack cross section was divided into 12 equal areas. The 

ports were labeled A and B. During the test runs each point was sampled for 7.5 minutes which yielded a 

total test time of 90 minutes. The dimensions of the stack and the location of the sampling ports and points 

are detailed in Figure 2. 

TRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. LELAC CERTIFICATE NO. 04036 Page 12 of 17 
St,•tionary Source Sampling, Triangle Brick Company April 22, 2005 Brick Kiln F-•chaust, Wadesboro, North Carolina Trigon Project No. 046-05-011 

Brick Kiln Exhaust 

134" 

Flow 

585.5" 

Not to Scale 

Figure 2 

Location of Sampling Ports and Points 

T•1GON E•qGINEEm'NG CO]qSU#TAIC•S, INC. LELAC CERTIFICATE NO. 04036 Page 13 of 17 
Stalionary Source Sampling, Triangle Brick Company April 22, 2005 

Brick Kiln Exhaust, Wadesboro, North Carolina Trigon Project No. 046-05-011 

3.3 Quality Assurance and Quality Control 

Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc., has established quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) 

guidelines for providing quality sampling and analytical data from source tests. These QA/QC procedures 

were implemented to ensure the acceptability and reliability of the data generated. 

In summary, an appropriate degree of data quality was maintained throughout this project. Leak checks and 

isokinetic QA criteria were met. The sampling trains were leak checked prior to and immediately after 

sampling. Leak rates for the isokinetic sampling trains were less than the maxmaum criterion of 0.02 cubic 

feet per minute. The sampling rates were also within the 100% +10% criterion established for isokinetic 

sampling. Quality control procedures for the referenced methods were followed and are reported in 

Appendix C with the laboratory data. 

Quality Control 

Brick Kiln No. 2 

Isokinetics 

Run 1 

94.1% 

Actual 

Run 2 

96.7% 

Run 3 

Criteria 

98.1% 100+ 10% 

Leak Cheeks 0.002 ft3 0.003 ft3 0.004 • < 0.020 ft 3 

Post Meter Calibration Meter # 300.248 Y 1.03 1 + 0.05 

Laboratory Quality Controls 

PM Acetone Rinse Blank 

26A Spike and Recovery: 

Hydrogen Chloride 

0.00 < 0.001% Acetone Residue 

89.4 % 75 to 125 % 

Hydrogen Fluoride 

26A Audit Sample 

80.8 % 75 to 125 % 

Chloride 36.9 mg/L passed 

Field data and final laboratory results were entered into Trigon's Air Quality Data System by an 

environmental scientist, independently audited by the Project Manager, and reviewed by the Quality 

Assurance Manager for verification of data. After QC review by the QA Manager, the Operations Manager 

verified the f'mal report for completeness and reasonableness of data. The report was returned to the Project 

Manager for review and preparation of the f'mal draft. The report requires the signature of the Project 

Manager, QA Manager, and the Operations Manager before release to the client. Data and fmal reports are 

archived in a secured area for a minimum period often years. 

TRIG-ON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. LELAC CERTIFICATE NO. 04036 Page 14 of 17 
Stcjtionary Source Sampling, Triangle Brick Company April 22, 2005 Brick Kiln Exhaust, Wadesboro, North Carolina Trigon Project No. 046-05-011 

Trigon's field and laboratory test equipment has been maintained and calibrated in accordance with quality 

'•surance procedures established by the US EPA in the QA Handbook. Equipment calibrations including 

pre-test and post-test calibration data are presented in Appendix E. 

TPdGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, 1Nc. LEI.MC CERTIFICATE NO. 04036 Page 15 of 17 
Stationary' Source Sampling, Triangle Brick Company April 22, 2005 Brick Kiln Exhaust, Wadesboro, North Carolina Trigon Project No. 046-05-011 

4.0 RESULTS 

This section presents a brief summary of the emission sampling at the referenced facility. Detailed 

sampling results and example calculations for the test program can be found in Appendix A. Field data 

sheets and sample recovery documentation are presented in Appendix B. 

4.1 Summary of Results 

The table below is a synopsis of the sampling conducted at the Brick Kiln Exhaust. 

Brick Kiln (K-2) Exhaust 

Parameter Emission Rate, lbs/ton product 

Hydrogen Chloride 0.023 

Hydrogen Fluoride 0.0051 

Particulate Matter 0.069 

The highest opacity observed for a six-minute period was 0%. 

4.2 Discussion 

This sampling program was performed to demonstrate compliance with Air Quality Permit No. 

08179T05 and MACT-JJJJJ. The emission limits for the permit is provided in the following table. 

Regulated Pollutant Limits/Standards Applicable Regulation 

Particulate Matter <0.12 Ibs/ton of fired product 

Hydrogen Chloride 

Hydrogen Fluoride 

< 0.056 lbs/ton of fired product 

< 0.057 lbs/ton of fired product 

Visible Emissions < 0% 

15A NCAC 2D.1111 

(40 CFR 63 Subpart JJJJJ) 

TPdGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. LELAC CERTIFICATE NO. 04036 Page 16 of 17 
April 22, 2005 

Trigon Project hb. 046-05-011 

5.0 APPENDICES 

This section contains detailed supportive documentation that encompasses the relevant aspects of the 

emission test program. Its contents serve as the foundation for the test report. The emission test report 

presents a summary of the information gathered during the sampling activities. The information contained 

in the appendices is necessary to facilitate the review of the emission test report and determine whether 

proper procedures were used to accomplish the test plan objectives. 

Defensible data and the subsequent pollutant concentrations and emission rates is one of the primary 

objectives ot any emission test program. To this end, the test results, example calculations, field data sheets, 

sample recovery, laboratory results, chain of custody documentation, and equipment calibrations have been 

provided to support these objectives. 

TRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. LELAC CERTIFICATE NO. 04036 Page 17 of 17 
Page ! of 161 

APPENDIX A 

SUMMARY OF RESULTS AND EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS 
Triangle Brick 

Wadesboro, NC 

Tfigon Project No. 046-05-011 

61 

Run Number 

Sample Identification 

Date: 

0 

Pl•t 

Ps 

Vu 

z•II 

V• 

V• 

Vwc 

Bws 

M• 

%o• 

%CO2 

%CO 

Ma 

M• 

Cp 

APS 

T, 

V• 

A 

Qsn 

Q, 

Q•w 

D0 

A. 

I 

Prat• 

SU/VlMARY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 26A 

Determination of Hydrogen Halides & Halogens with Particulate Emissions 

Net Time of Test, minutes 

Sample Time, 24-hour clock 

Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 

Static Pressure, in. Hg 

Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 

Actual Meter Volume Sampled, cu. ft. 

Avg. Delta H, •n. H20 

Avg. Gas Meter Temp., Deg. F 

Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 

Volume of Water Collected, ml 

Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond.,SCF 

Moisture Content of Gas Stream 

Percent Moisture in Stack 

Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 

Percent Oxygen, Dry 

Percent Carbon Dioxide, Dry 

Percent Carbon Monoxide, Dry 

Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/lb mole 

Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mole 

Pitot Tube Constant 

Avg. Sqrt. Delta P, in. H20 

Avg. Stack Temp., Deg. F 

Avg. Stack Velocity, tVsee 

Area Stack, t• 

Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond. CFM 

Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM 

Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 

Sample Nozzle Diameter, inches 

Area of Nozzle, t• 

Percent Isokinetic 

Production Rate, lbs/hr 

2 3 Average 

5011-01 .5011-02 5011-03 

3/9/2005 3/9/2005 3/9/2005 

90 90 90 

0906-1041 1056-1229 1241-1416 

29.65 29.68 29.65 29.66 

-0.013 -0.013 -0.013 -0.013 

29.637 29.667 29.637 29.647 

77.073 51.977 56.390 61.813 

2.51 1.05 1.22 1.59 

75.7 81.0 81.7 79.5 

75.748 50.452 54.632 60.277 

173.9 114.6 124.5 137.7 

8.19 5.40 5.86 6.48 

0.098 0.097 0.097 0.097 

9.8 9.7 9.7 9.7 

0.902 0.903 0.903 0.903 

15.77 16.73 17.33 16.61 

3.80 3.07 2.57 3.15 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

29.239 29.160 29.104 29.168 

28.142 28.082 28.028 28.084 

0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

0.437 0.458 0.432 0.442 

368.3 381.8 388.4 379.5 

31.2 33.0 31.4 31.9 

21.31 2•1.31 "21.31 21.31 

22756 23732 22334 22941 

39935 42241 40118 40765 

25216 26271 24731 25406 

0.392 0.309 0.329 0.343 

0.00084 0.00052 0.00059 0.00065 

94.1 96.7 98.1 96.3 

22.4 22.4 22.4 22.4 

Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. 
Triangle Brick 

Wadesboro, NC 

Trigon Project No. 046-05-011 

SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 26A 

Determination of Hydrogen Halides & Halogens with Particulate Emissions 

Front Half Analysis Non-Condensable Particulate Matter 

CAw 

E 

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration and Emission Rate 

Mw,cl Molecular Weight of Hydrogen Chloride, g/mole 

mar, no Hydrogen Chloride Catch, ug 

Non-Condensable Catch, mg 31.0 29.8 28.5 29.8 

Non-Condensable Concentration, gr/dscf 0.0063 0.0091 0.0080 0.0078 

Non-Condensable Concentrfition, gr/acf 0.0062 0.0088 0.0078 0.0076 

Non-Condensable Emission Rate, lbs/hr 1.23 1.85 1.54 1.54 

Non-Condensible Emission Rate, lbs/ton of brick 0.055 0.083 .0.069 0.069 

36.46 36.46 36.46 36.46 

13,586 8,750 8,268 10,201 

Cs 

CAW 

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, ppmv 4.18 4.04 3.53 3.92 

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, mg/dscm 6.33 6.12 5.34 5.93 

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, gr/dscf 0.0028 0.0027 0.0023 0.0026 

Hydrogen Chloride Emission Rate, lbs/hr 0.54 0.54 0.45 0.51 

Hydrogen Chloride Emission Rate, ibs/ton of brick 0.024 0.024 0.020 0.023 

Hydrogen 

C, 

C, 

E 

Flouride Concentration and Emission Rate 

Molecular Weight of Hydrogen Flouride, g/mole 20.01 20.01 20.01 20.01 

Hydrogen Flouride Catch, ug 2,795 1,975 1,960 2,243 

Hydrogen Floaride •Concentration, ppmv 1.57 1.66 1.52 1.58 

Hydrogen Flouride Concentration, mg/dscm 1.30 1.38 1.27 1.32 

Hydrogen Flouride Concentration, gr/dscf 0.00057 0.00060 0.00055 0.00057 

Hydrogen Flouride Emission Rate, lbs/hr 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.11 

Hydrogen Flouride Emission Rate, lbs/ton of brick 0.0050 0.0055 0.0047 0.0051 

Minimum detection limit (MDL) is the value below which the laboratory cannot confiml the presence of an analyte of interest reliably. 

The limit of quantification (LOQ) is the value which the laboratory cannot quantitate the analyte of interest within the criteria of the method. 

The symbol ND following a value indicates a non-detect or result below the MDL. 

Trigon Engineering Consultants; Inc. 
Wadesboro, NC 

VrigonProje•t.No. 046-05.,011 

SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 26A 

Determination of Hydrogen Halides & Halogens with Particulate Emissions 

Front Half Analysis Non-Condensable Particulate Matter 

Non-Condensable Concentration, gr/dscf 

(At Standard Conditions) 

Cs 0.0154 m, Vsro 0.0063 

Non-Condensable Concentration, gr/acf 

(At Standard Conditions) 

C,• 0.0154 * m, / VM 0.0062 

Non-Condensable Emission Rate, lbs/hr 

(At Standard Conditions) 

C^w 0.00857 * C• * Qst• 1.2 

Non-Condensible Emission Rate, lbs/ton of brick 

E C^w / Pr•t¢ 0.00056 

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration and Emission Rate 

Hydrogen Chloride Catch, ug 

mnCl2 mugCl" * mwCl" / mwCl2 

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, ppmv 

Cs Cm MwHCI * 24.05408 

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, mg/dsem 

Cm mugHCl*0.001 /Vsra * 0.0283160502 

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, gr/dscf 

Cs 0.0154 * mu•HCl *0.001/Vs'ro 

Hydrogen Chloride Emission Rate, lbs/hr 

(At Standard Conditions) 

C^w 0.00857 * Cs * QsD 

Hydrogen Chloride Emission Rate, lbs/ton of brick 

E CAW Pr•t• 

Hydrogen Flouride Concentration and Emission Rate 

Hydrogen Floudde Catch, ug 

mnCI m•gCl" mwCF mwCl2 

Hydrogen Flouride Concentration, ppmv 

Cs Cm MwCI2 * 24.05408 

Hydrogen Flouride Concentration, mg/dscm 

Cm maCl2 *0.001/VSrD * 0.0283160502 

Hydrogen Flouride Concentration, gr/dscf 

Cs 0.0154 maCl2 *0.001/Vs•o 

Hydrogen Flouride Emission Rate, lbs/hr 

CAW 0.00857 * Cs * Qst• 

Hydrogen Flouride Emission Rate, lbs/ton of brick 

E C^w Prate 

Standard Conditions 68 Deg. F, 29.92 in. Hg 

13,586 

4.2 

6.3 

0.0028 

0.54 

0.023 

2795 

1.6 

1.3 

0.00057 

0.11 

0.0050 

Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. 
Page 6 of 161 

EPA Method 9 Visual Emissions Observations 

Company: Triangle Brick 

Location: Brick Kiln Exhaust 

City/State: Wadesboro, NC 

Observer: Larry E. Reynolds 

Run # Page of 2 

Date: 24-Mar-05 

Observation Times 

Begin: 921 

End: 1021 

Average Opacity Per Six Minute Period 

Period Opacity Period Opacity 

0.0 6 0.0 

2 0.0 7 0.0 

3 0.0 8 0.0 

4 0.0 9 0.0 

5 0.0 10 0.0 

Maximum Six Minute Average Reading 0.0 

Minimum Six Minute Average Reading 0.0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 0 

0 0 0 0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0.0 

0 0 0.0 

0 0 0.0 

0 0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 
Page 7 of !61 

Company: 

Location: 

City/State: 

Observer: 

Run # 

Date: 24-Mar-05 

Observation Times 

Begin: 921 

End: 1021 

Triangle Brick 

Brick Kiln Exhaust 

Wadesboro, NC 

Larry E. Reynolds 

Page 2 of 2 

EPA Method 9 Visual Emissions Observations 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 ..0.0 

0 0 

0 0 

o o 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 0 0 

0 0 0 0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 
Page 8 of 161 

Company: Triangle Brick 

Location: Brick Kiln Exhaust 

City/State: Wadesboro, NC 

Observer: Larry E. Reynolds 

Run # 2 Page of 2 

Date: 24-Mar-05 

Observation Times 

Begin: 1032 

End: 1132 

EPA Method 9 Visual Emissions Observations 

Average Opacity Per Six Minute Period 

Period Opacity Period Opacity 

0.0 6 0.0 

2 0.0 7 0.0 

3 0.0 8 0.0 

4 0.0 9 0.0 

5 0.0 10 0.0 

Maximum Six Minute Average Reading 0.0 

Minimum Six Minute Average Reading 0.0 

0 

0 

0 0 0 0 

0 0 

0 0 0 0 

0 0 0 "0 

0 0 0 0 

0 0 0 0 

0 0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0.0 

0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 

0 0 0 0 

0 0 0 0 

0 0 0 0 

0 0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 0.0 0.0 

0 0.0 0.0 

0 0.0 0.0 

0 0.0 0.0 

0 0.0 0.0 

0 0.0 0.0 
Page 9of161 

EPA Method 9 Visual Emissions Observations 

Company: Triangle Brick 

Location: Brick Kiln Exhaust 

City/State: Wadesboro, NC 

Observer: Larry E. Reynolds 

Run # 2 Page 2 of 2 

Date: 24-Mar-05 

Observation Times 

Begin: 1032 

End: 1132 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

•• 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

•• 

o o o o o.o o.o o.o o.o 

•• 

o o o o o.o o.o o.o o.o 

o o o o o.o o.o o.o o.o 

•• 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

•• 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

• • • 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

• i• o o o 0 o.o o.o o.o o.o 

•• o o o o o.o o.o o.o o.o 

•• 

• 

0 0 .0 0 0.0 0.0--; 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

•.,. •..•,• 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

• 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

•.•• • 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

•• 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

• o o o o o.o o.o o.o o.o 

•• 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 
PagelOofl61 

EPA Method 9 Visual Emissions Observations 

Company: 

Location: 

City/State: 

Observer: 

Run # 

Date: 24-Mar-05 

Observation Times 

Begin: 1132 

End: 1232 

Triangle Brick 

Brick Kiln Exhaust 

Wadesboro, NC 

Larry E. Reynolds 

3 Page of 2 

Average Opacity Per Six Minute Period 

Period Opacity Period Opacity 

0.0 6 0.0 

2 0.0 7 0.0 

3 0.0 8 0.0 

4 0.0 9 0.0 

5 0.0 10 0.0 

Maximum Six Minute Average Reading 0.0 

Minimum Six Minute Average Reading 0.0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 0 0 

0 0 0 0 

0 0 0 0 

0.0 

0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 
Page llof161 

Company: Triangle Brick 

Location: Brick Kiln Exhaust 

City/State: Wadesboro, NC 

Observer: Larry E. Reynolds 

Run # 3 Page 2 of 2 

Date: 24-Mar-05 

Observation Times 

Begin: 1132 

End: 1232 

EPA Method 9 Visual Emissions Observations 

o 

o o o 0.o 0.o o.0 0.o 

o o o o.o o.0 o.o o.0 

o o o 0.0 o.o 0.o o.o 

o 0 0 0.o o.o o.o 0.o 

o o 0 o.o o.o o.o o.0 

o 0 o o.o o.o o.o o.o 

0 0 o o.0 o.o 0.o o.o 

0 o o o.0 0.o 0.o o.o 

0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 

0 0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 O. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

0 0 0 O 0.0 
Page 12 of 16! 

APPENDIX B 

FIELD DATA SHEETS 
8ampliug Loc•on ..n "•••2 

Page 13of161. 

gPA Method1 

.D. .eterTm'n:m'on..o f •aTnpling Ports and 

"•.qu•calen•: Diameter C•Icu/•don.•D]•).: •/.,•CA T/ON ? 

qq 
Page 14 of 161 

EPA Method 2 

Determinan'on of Stack Gas Velocity, Volumetric Flow Rate and Cyclonic Flow 

Point 

Number 

Veloelt 7 Head Ap Inche• 

Stack Temperature, Dry, °F (A) 

Field :Data 

C•,cloa•c, FIo'• D•erm;nadoa 

•p• at O" Reference 

09.03 

O 

ODI 

Stack Temperature, Wet °F (B) 

Preliminary Percent Moisture 

Angle Which Yidda Null Ap 

Cofrllnenis 
Fo before Note: Calculate the 

e,,dsts, reanalyze the sarrrple. The Fo example calculation is shown below: Fo 

20.9% %02 

g 

% CO2 

F. Ranges For Common Fueh 

A.nflwacit¢ Coal and Lignite 1.016 1.130 Wood 

Bituminous Coal 1.083 1.230 Wood Bark 

Di,•tfllate Oil 1.260 1.413 Natural Ga• 

1.210- 1.370 propane 

Oil 

1.000- 1.120 

1.003 1.130 
EPA Method 26A •/loisture Determination and Sample Recove, j Data Anff.l•S/§of 161 

Client Name f',-a•xq[ ¢_ 

Samp•g Location • ?, 

Clean-Up Box Number 

Cha• of •stody: Date Received 

Project Number Oq•-O5 

Sample Date 2•/g• 

Samples Recovered By 

Recove• Date 

Received • • Locked? 

Equipment Documentation 

Run Number 

Sample ID Number 

Sample Box Number 

Probe Number ;)oo. 0o •3 

Analysis of Moisture Recovery 

Reagent Recovery Container # 

Impinger Absorbing Solution 

Description of Reagent 

Reagent Level Marked? 

Final Volume, ml 

Initial Volumer ml 

Reagent RecoveryContainer # 

Impinger Absorbing Solution 

Description of Reagent 

Reagent Level Marked? 

Final Volume, ml 

Initial Volume, ml 

Net Condensed Volume, ml 

Silica Gel Recover'/Container 

Percent Silica Gel Spent 

Final Weight, g 

Initial Weight, g 

Total Reagent Collected, g 

Sample Recovery 

Recovery Container # 

Rinsing Solution 

Sample Container Sealed? 

Liquid Level Marked? 

Reagent Blanks 

Absorbing Reagent Blank 

Absorbing Blank Identification # 

Absorbing Reagent Blank 

Absorbing Blank Identification # 

Analyst Initials 

Reviewer hdtials 

sou-foe(' 

I 

Rinsing Reagent Blank 

Rinsing Blank Identification # 

Rinsing Reagent Blank 

Rinsing Blank Identification # 
Samplin• Location 

Isokinetic Fiehl Data Sheet EPA Method •-I•" • Page 17 of 161 

/ 

Run Number / 

Static Press., tn. H20 

Sample Box No. 

ProbelPitot No. 

Probe Temp. Setting 

Sample tO No. 

CO Ill Illl• lll.s 

lsokinetic Check: 
Sampling kocatim'• • •. 

Isokinetic Field Data Sheet EPA Method 

Run Number 

DaLe .•i.•q/•.• 

Operators 

Bar. Press., tn. Hg 

Static Press., In. H20 

Sample Box No. 

Prob•Pitot No. 

Probe Temp. Setting 

AtOMOGRAPH SET-UP: X Factor 

SiackTemp.. •-•0 Desired No•le 
Sampling Location •',.•...•.. 

1sokinetic Fiehl Data Sheet EPA Method 

Sample Box No.. • S{ack Temp. • •5 Desired 

Probe Temp. Setting • % Moisture i0 

! 

Run Number 

Date ,'•/-.• 5//o,6 

Operato,s 

LEAK CHECKS 

Pre-Test • @ • In. Hg. 

Pre-Test pilot <0,1 @ •ln. H20 

Nozzle No. ,3W,.S• Post-T•st Pitot <0. •• [n H20 

Nozzle Calibration ..0,•.• • 3.• •, 3• 

No=leOi•e•r •,• * Observ•-• eeOC1' ¢ 

398 x,-15-,•o 

.-•.o 9.'-/el ,;wg- 
osible Emission Observation Form Page 20 of 161 

Source. Layout Sketch Draw North Arrow 

• Em•si•n P•int 

Sun • • 

Wind • 

Plume 

Stack x 

Observers Position 

Sun Location Line 

1 

2 

3 

Have Received Copy of'lltes,: OI)aClt Ohservatitms Sit,,nalure 

s•op "nine / 0 7- 

0 15 30 45 • 

0 0 00 

00o0 

0 0 o 

0 0 o o 

0000 

o 0 o o 

7 0 0 0 0 

8 0 o 0 0 

10 0 0 0 0 

11 0 0 0 0 

1• 00 • 0 

13 0 0 0 

14 0 0 0 0 

•5 ,0 C) 0 0 

•6 0 0 0 o 

17 D 0 0 O 

18 0 

19 0 O 0 0 

20 • 0 0 o 

2z 0 0 0 

23 0 0 0 

24 

0o00 

2.15 0 19 0 (• 

27 

28 00 Oo 

29 0 0 0 0 

30 00o0 

0 15 30 45 

31 00 0 0 

32 0 0 0 0 

33 0 0 0 

34 •) 0 0 •.• ") 

35 0 0 c9 0 

37 0 •) ./p 0 

38 0 0 0 

39 o 0 0 o 

40 0 © 0 0 

4Z 0 0 0 0 

42 (9 0 0 

• 0 o 0 o 

45 0 0 i0 

46 0 0 0 

47 0 C9 0 0 

48 0 0 0 0 

49 () b 0 0 

50 0 0 0 0 

51 0 0 0 

52 0 0 0 0 

53 o 0 o 0 

54 0 0 C" 0 

55 0 o D o 

56 00 0 o 

57 0 0 0 0-, 

58 0 o o 0 

59 D 0 0 0 

60 0 0 o o 

D•e V=rilled •:. Date 
.sible Emission Observation Form Page 21 of 161 

/ 

J /. 

Wind •r•n • 

Wet B•e °F Dn/• °F 

Source. Layout Sketch Draw North Arrow 

..,• 

x Emission Point 

Sun • zg•'r • 

Wind- '• • 

Plum•. 

Stack x 

Observers Position 

Sun Location Line 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

58 

59 

6O 

Minimum 0 •um 

Organi•tion: T En eefing Consultant, Inc. 

Certified By: 

V=rifi• • Date 
,sible Emission Observation Form Page22of161 

Source Name .7-.! .5[•-- •.c• •1•.• •. o•.•,. O, 

Address L• •..•/ •"2-- •,!-•-• 0 15 30 45 •,•s• 

Height Above Ground 1.xvel Height Rdative Obse•w• .•O/" / 

• Fr°m Obs•rv• •7 OO/ Dir •-lion F,om Observea, • 

Reiafiye Humidly, • • / Wet Bulb "F Dly Bulb 

Source. Layout Sketch Draw North •rrow 

Sun I• 

Wind 

Plume 

Stack x 

x Emission Point 

Observers Position 

Sun Location Line 

Have Received Copy of 1%•.•c Opacity Ohscl•ati,ms Signalure 

0 15 30 45 

o 0 c 6 

0 o o O 

0 .0 0 o 

0 o O o 

D o o o 

o 

• • O0 

&o oO 

e 0 o o 

000 o 

0 

0 O o 0 

• o 0 

0 o © 

0 "• o O 

0 o 0 0 

o o 0 

0"0 O• 0 

0 •. 0 o 

0 o o o 

0 • • 0 

0 0 o 0 

• o 0 o 

0 o o 0 

0 0 o o 

0 0 © 0 

0 0 o o 

6) 0 o, 0 
Page 23 of 161 

APPENDIX C 

LABORATORY DATA 

Page 25 of 161 
Page 26 of 161 

Trigon Engineering 

Consultants, Inc. 

6200 Harris Technology Blvd. 

Charlotte, NC 28269 

Triangle Brick 

(Project # 046-05-011) 

Analytical Report 

(0305-91) 

EPA Meth o d 2 6A 

Hydrogen fluoride 

Hydrogen chloride 

Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. 

Phone: (919) 850-4392 / Fax: (919) 850 9012 / www.enthalpy.com 

2202 Ellis Road Durham, NC 27703 5518 
Pag¢27of 161 

I certify that to the best 0f my knowledge all analytical data presentedin this report: 

• Have been checked for completeness 

• Are accurate, error-free, and legible 

• Have been conducted in accordance with approved protocol, and that all deviatiom and analytical problems are summarized in the appropriate narrative(s ) 

• This analytical report was prepared in Portable Document Format (.PDF) and contains 100 pages. 

QA Review Performed by: Michael Steven Schapira 
Page 28 of/61 

Summary of Results 
Pag• 29 of 161 

CompanyJTdgon Engineering 

Analyst InitialslTG ParametersJEPA Method 26A 

# Samplesl3 Runs & 1 blank 

Client #1046-05-011 

Job #10305-91 

PO #1Verbal 

Report Date14/11/2005 

Compound Sample ID / Catch Weight 

Hydrogen fluoride 

Hydrogen chloride 

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

2,795 1,975 1,960 

13,586 8,750 -8,268 

H2S04 BIk 

53.2 ND 

43.5 ND 

daw 0305-91-res 4/11/2005 3:30 PM 
Page 30 of 161 

CompanylTdgon Engineering 

Analyst InitialslTG ParameterslEPA Method 26A 

# Samples[ 1 Audit 

Client #[ 046-05-011 

Job #10305-91 

PO #[verbal Report Date[4/11/2005 

Compound Sample ID / Concentration (mg/L) 

Chloride 

M26A-2230-01 / M1701 

36.9 

daw 0305-91-audit 4/12/2005 11:18 AM 
Page 31 of 161 

Results