alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

C.H., *

parent of I.H., a minor, *

* No. 18-1920V

Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v. * Filed: November 3, 2021

* Reissued: December 8, 2021

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Stipulation; Hepatitis B vaccine;

* inactivated polio (“IPV”); idiopathic

* thrombocytopenic purpura (“ITP”).

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Ronald C. Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for Petitioner;

Ronalda E. Kosh, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION1

On November 3, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the 

petition for compensation filed by C.H. on December 14, 2018. In her petition, 

petitioner alleged that the hepatitis B and inactivated polio (“IPV”) vaccines, 

which are contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 

100.3(a), and which I.H. received on March 6, 2017, caused I.H. to suffer 

idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (“ITP”). Petitioner further alleges that I.H.

suffered the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Petitioner 

represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for 

damages on behalf of I.H. as a result of his condition.

Respondent denies that the vaccines caused I.H. to suffer from ITP or any 

other injury.

1 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), C.H. filed a motion to redact her name from the 

decision. This motion was granted and the decision is being otherwise released to the public.
2

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The 

undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the 

Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

a. A lump sum payment of $7,632.84, which amount represents 

reimbursement of a lien for services rendered on behalf of I.H. by 

Wellcare, a Medicaid plan, in the form of a check payable jointly to 

petitioner and Equian, and mailed to:

Equian

P.O. Box 182643

Columbus, OH 43218

Tax ID #: 27-0083277

Equian Event Number: 45764645

Legacy Case Number: 995746

Attn: Michael Zyrowski

b. An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in 

paragraph 10 of the stipulation, paid to the life insurance company 

from which the annuity will be purchased (the “Life Insurance 

Company”).

These amounts represent all other damages that would be available 

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, 

the clerk is directed to enter judgment according to this decision and the attached 

stipulation.2

 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each 

party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal 

Claims judge.
3

Special Master
National Reconnaissance Office Release

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release #08-20

Contact: (703) 808-5050 Dec. 11, 2020

NRO delivers advanced reconnaissance capabilities with fifth launch of 

2020

CHANTILLY, Va. — The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) successfully launched 

its NROL-44 mission aboard a United Launch Alliance Delta IV Heavy from Space 

Launch Complex-37 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station (CCSFS), Florida, at 8:09

p.m. EST on Dec. 10, 2020.

NROL-44 was the agency’s fifth launch in 2020 and its 30th launch with United Launch 

Alliance (ULA). NROL-44 was previously indefinite on range at CCSFS after several 

launch delays.

“We are proud to launch NROL-44 alongside our partners at ULA, the 45th Space Wing, 

and the U.S. Space Force Space and Missile Systems Center,” said U.S. Air Force 

Colonel Chad Davis, Director of the NRO’s Office of Space Launch. “This launch is a 

testament to the resilience and expertise of our launch teams, who have worked 

together to troubleshoot issues to make this launch possible.” 

“The COVID-19 pandemic has required all of us to channel ingenuity and patience this 

year as we overcome new hurdles and find new ways of doing business,” Davis 

continued. “Our NRO team members and launch partners exemplified these qualities

and delivered cutting-edge reconnaissance capabilities to support our defense and 

intelligence partners.”

The mission carried a classified national security payload designed, built and operated 

by the NRO in support of its overhead reconnaissance mission. Data collected by NRO’s 

national security systems are used to provide intelligence to United States’ senior policy 

makers, the Intelligence Community and Department of Defense, as well as U.S. allied 

partners. Data collected by NRO systems can also be used to assist emergency and 

disaster relief efforts in the U.S. and around the world.

The NRO’s next launch will be NROL-108, which is scheduled to launch from Kennedy 

Space Center later this month. 

###

The NRO is the Intelligence Community element and a Department of Defense agency 

responsible for developing, acquiring, launching, and operating America’s intelligence satellites to 

meet the national security needs of our nation.
# C_2005046EN.01000101.xml

| 22.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 February 2005

(2005/C 46/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3055 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,76 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,444 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6891 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,12 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5447 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 79,9 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2855 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5830 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,922 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 243,65 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6961 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4309 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9877 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 034 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,75 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,054 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7062 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6558 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6073 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1825 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7979 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1379 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 335,79 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,7531 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3055

JPY

Japanese yen

137,76

DKK

Danish krone

7,444

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6891

SEK

Swedish krona

9,12

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5447

ISK

Iceland króna

79,9

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2855

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5830

CZK

Czech koruna

29,922

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

243,65

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6961

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4309

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9877

ROL

Romanian leu

36 034

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,75

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,054

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7062

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6558

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6073

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1825

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7979

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1379

KRW

South Korean won

1 335,79

ZAR

South African rand

7,7531

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### Lewis and wife, Appellants, vs. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Company, Respondent.

For the appellants: *Raymond J. Cannon,*attorney, and *John L. Newman*of counsel, both of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Shaw, Muskat & Paulsen,*attorneys, and *F. H. Prosser*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 12, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1206

Lower Tribunal No. 14-25364

________________

John Ramos,

Appellant,

vs.

Natalie Quilliams,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Migna 

Sanchez-Llorens, Judge.

John Ramos, in proper person.

Appellee precluded from filing an answer brief. 

Before EMAS, C.J., and MILLER and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
FIRST M
& F CORPORATION





EXHIBIT
32.1





SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATIONS





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of First M&F Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Hugh S. Potts, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





A.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





B.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
            May
      14, 2010





/s/ Hugh S. Potts,
      Jr.Hugh S. Potts, Jr.Chairman
      and Chief Executive
Officer
r. _TIP-RCIEr

71ENATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

• viA0111/ISTON. D.C.'

OPP= OP THO OORITY OMICTC111

MEMORWMERI FOR THE DIRECTOR, PROGRAM •

DIRECTOR, MMUS

CHAIRMAN, COST=

SUBJECT: Domestic ImmoorY

The attached proposed statement of policy and proposed procedures regarding the requirements, acquisition and

exploitation of domesticlaraery with IOW systems is forwarded

for your coordination. It *intended that these documents

-formalize current practice,.not change it. Such.formal

statementsairjaquired in resvonse to "cent gmnibus

Executive orderinN

,(44,„e e4e..reedete 4c4.40,44.

a.. sop

Ai ds!. 'response to the iattoraw General- is duel Jima 1976,

request your coordination or comments by 15 April 1976.

Charles W. Cook

Attac.hmnts

Action officer: Lt Colfffia

CUISINIA1111111L61111:

111111111101FLI .

MIN 1111111111•11/0111M1114111 JUIP-IMIEr 11111111111111411111111, IN WPM

CONTROL NO

PiellOP "PvAPalaPira PAO=
NRO POLICY WITH RESPECT TO DOMESTIC IMAGERY 

•

Imagery of the United States, its possessions, or territories

obtained with NRP resources should be minimized and obtained

only in response to formal, documented requirements of the

Committee on Imagery Collection and Exploitation, Committee for

Civil Application of Classified Photography of the United States,

or in response to the bona fide and documented engineering

requirements of the NRO, necessary for the successful operation,

evaluation or improvement of NRP systems. All such imagery

will be obtained and exploited in accordance with public law.

CON/ 1401. NO

COPY 01 COP/ES

PAM Oi PACH S
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1257 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify authorities relating to 

the collective bargaining of employees in the Veterans Health Administration, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2015 

Mr. BROWN (for himself, Mr. SANDERS, and Mr. MERKLEY) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify authorities 

relating to the collective bargaining of employees in the 

Veterans Health Administration, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Department of Vet5 erans Affairs Employee Fairness Act of 2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1257 IS

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITIES ON COLLECTIVE 

2 BARGAINING OF EMPLOYEES OF THE VET3 ERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION. 

4 Section 7422 of title 38, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) by striking subsections (b), (c), and (d); and 

7 (2) by redesignating subsection (e) as sub8 section (c). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2005132EN.01002701.xml

| 28.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 132/27

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 16 March 2005

in Case T-329/03 Fabio Andrés Ricci v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Officials - Competition - Condition for admission - Professional experience - Decisions of the competition selection board - Type of control exercised by the appointing authority - Evaluation of experience - Legitimate expectations)

(2005/C 132/48)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case T-329/03: Fabio Andrés Ricci, residing in Turin (Italy), represented by M. Condinanzi, lawyer, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Currall and H. Tserepa-Lacombe, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for annulment of the decision of the Commission not to appoint the applicant in connection with vacancy notice COM/2001/5265/R — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, N.J. Forwood and S. Papasavvas, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 16 March 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 275, 15.11.2003.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           I, Richard W. Lucas, as Chief Financial Officer of KSW, Inc., (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

           (1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  November 12, 2003

                                                     /s/ Richard W. Lucas
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Richard W. Lucas
                                                     Chief Financial Officer



                                       23
Exhibit 21


                      SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                (As Reorganized)
                          (A Development Stage Company)
                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


Sprint Spectrum L.P. is the parent. The subsidiaries of Sprint Spectrum L.P. are
as follows:



                                                                   Ownership
                                          Jurisdiction or         Interest Held
                                         Incorporation of             By Its
     Name                                  Organization         Immediate Parent
--------------------------------------- ------------------     -----------------
WirelessCo, L.P.                              Delaware                 100

Sprint Spectrum Equipment Company, L.P.       Delaware                 100

Sprint Spectrum Realty Company, L.P.          Delaware                 100

Sprint Spectrum Finance Corporation           Delaware                 100
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AP RIL 25, 2014

NO. 03

- 12

- 00105

- CR

David Jollone King, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 427TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBE RTON, AND ROSE

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the pa rties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudicatio n of costs is

made.
# C_2005005EN.01000401.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/4

---

CALL FOR PROPOSALS — DG EAC No EAC/73/04

CALL FOR PROPOSALS

Call for proposals on general activities of observation, analysis and innovation, 2005

(Actions 6.1.2 and 6.2 of the Socrates programme)

(2005/C 5/04)

1.   Objectives and description

On the basis of the Decision of the European Parliament and the Council adopting the second phase of the Community programme Socrates (1), the Commission is inviting proposals for the implementation of ‘General activities of observation and analysis’ (sub-action 6.1.2, points c) and d)) and ‘Innovatory Initiatives responding to emerging needs’ (action 6.2), in the form of measures to improve and facilitate the exchange of information and experiences and the development of innovations in the field of education among the countries participating in the Socrates programme.

1

2.   Eligible applicants

Applications for assistance may include, or be made by, establishments in the countries participating in the Socrates programme, i.e.:

| — | the 25 Member States of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

—

the 25 Member States of the European Union,

| — | EFTA and EEA countries: Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, |
| --- | --- |

—

EFTA and EEA countries: Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway,

| — | candidate countries: Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey. |
| --- | --- |

—

candidate countries: Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey.

Proposals may be submitted by organisations and institutions which are based in the countries participating in the Socrates programme, have the qualifications and experience needed to complete the proposed action, and actively involve, as project partners, establishments in at least five countries participating in the Socrates programme, including the project coordinator's country, and including at least one Member State of the European Union.

The establishments eligible to respond to this call for proposals are classified by type, in accordance with Annex 2 to the call for proposals (‘List of codes to be used in the application’).

3.   Budget and duration of projects

The total budget earmarked for the cofinancing of projects is of the order of EUR 2 297 000. Financial assistance from the Commission cannot exceed 75 % of the total eligible costs. The maximum subsidy granted by the Commission will be EUR 220 000 per year.

Activities must start on 1 October 2005. The maximum duration of projects is 24 months.

4.   Deadline

Applications for funding must be sent to the Commission no later than 18 March 2005.

5.   Further information

The full text of the call for proposals and the application form are available on the following website:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/education/programmes/socrates/observation/call_en.html

Applications must comply with all the requirements set out in the full text and must be submitted using the form provided.

---

(1)  Decision 253/2000/EC of 24.1.2000, OJ L 28, 3.2.2000, pp. 1 — 15.

1

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63299-63300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25241]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0698; Special Conditions No. 25-567-SC]

Special Conditions: Bombardier Aerospace, Models BD-500-1A10 and 
BD-500-1A11 Series Airplanes; Airplane Electronic System Security 
Protection From Unauthorized External Access

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final special conditions; corrections.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects two errors that appeared in Docket No. 
FAA-2014-0698, Special Conditions No. 25-567-SC, which was published in 
the Federal Register on September 12, 2014 (79 FR 54574). There is an 
error in the header information and in one instance of one of the 
airplane model numbers in the publication.

DATES: The effective date of this correction is October 23, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Varun Khanna, FAA, Airplane and Flight 
Crew Interface Branch, ANM-111,Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft 
Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-
3356; telephone (425) 227-1298; facsimile (425) 227-1149.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 12, 2014, the Federal Register 
published document designated as ``Docket No. FAA-2014-0698, Notice No. 
25-567-SC,'' (79 FR 54574). The document issued special conditions 
pertaining to network security in the digital systems architecture, 
access from external sources, on the BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11 series 
airplanes.
    As published, the document contained two errors:

[[Page 63300]]

    1. In the header of the document, ``Notice No.'' should have been 
``Special Conditions No.''
    2. In one instance, one of the airplane model numbers was published 
as ``BD-500-1A1'' instead of ``BD-500-1A11.''

Correction

    In Final special conditions document (FR Doc. 2014-21789) published 
on September 12, 2014 (79 FR 54574), make the following corrections:
    1. On page 54574, second column in the header information, correct 
``Notice No.'' to read ``Special Conditions No.''
    2. On page 54575, third column, last line in the introductory text 
in the section titled, ``The Special Conditions,'' correct ``BD-500-
1A1'' to read ``BD-500-1A11.''

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 16, 2014.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-25241 Filed 10-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2



                        Consent of Independent Auditors



The Board of Directors
CNET, Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Forms
S-8 (File Nos.333-07667, 333-34491 and 333-67325) and Forms S-3 (File Nos.
333-46203, 333-56633 and 333-73023) of CNET, Inc. of our report dated June 8,
1999, except as to Note 11(c) which is as of June 25, 1999, relating to the
balance sheets of SNAP! LLC as of December 31, 1997 and 1998, and the related
statements of operations, members' deficit, and cash flows for each of the years
in the two-year period ended December 31, 1998, which report appears in the
December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K/A of CNET, Inc.



                                                        /s/  KPMG LLP



San Francisco, California


AUGUST 2, 1999
•

•

.

 • • ie..' •

.:;.r.,;"/, • •
4

ntr, v".

4 1

4347.31ballarL4E. ':74

*4.4

144,

-.4:1,4 •

•

el*

•

''•':,r 4 - . ' . •

4 ••• :-• • . •,. A., n ''‘,V;..- •:.•• :A ,..,1

. Oi.N

... . • ... • . ..
'

"

,

"."

,

:„4.10-...4-4.7•1•••••••

• *.r re, '
e
99-206.

#### Humphrey v. Lane.

Hocking App. No. 98CA4. On motion for admission *pro hac vice*of Roman P. Storzer on behalf of The Becket Fund by Kathleen M. Trafford. Motion granted.