alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DEFENSE SUPPLY AGENC., 

HEADQUARTERS 

CAMERON STATION 

ALEXANDRIA. VIRGINIA 22314 

NRO ApPROVEV■FOR 

RELEASE 1 JJ.ILy.12434A,.., 

• -....0.11,1,.., 

,e8::-■ \1 1///23', , 

•.' ',•,...n -..;;-, ' 44' i-1--...'• - . aryl r." `-::... 

' -7797.14 

• C4-, 

"J. PLUTO 

tain SC USN 

Chief 

Systems Divi.taz 

2 2 DEC 1969 

IN REPLY 

REFER To DSAH-LSR 

SUBJECT: Reporting of Manned Orbiting Laboratory (MOL) Excess ADPE 

TO: Commanding Officer 

Space and Missile Systems Organization 

Los Angeles Air Force Station 

Los Angeles, California 90045 

1. References: 

a. Armed Services Procurement Regulation, para 24-205.8. 

b. Message, SAFSL 011422Z Oct 69. 

c. Letter, AFADAC, subject: Air Force Requirements for Manned 

Orbiting Laboratory (MOL) Excess Computers, dated 11 December 1969 

(copy attached as enclosure 2). 

2. Reference la requires contractor excess ADPE be reported to DSAH-LSR 

for screening as soon as it is possible to project a release date or 

when it is determined that it is no longer required on the contract. 

3. Reference lb directed that certain MOL excess.ADPE be reported to 

DSA; enclosure 1 indicates equipment that has not been reported to date. 

Failure to report is delaying reutilization of equipment required by 

Air Force, as indicated on enclosure 2, and DoD-wide screening of the. 

remaining equipment. 

4. Request reports of excess be expedited for ADPE listed on enclosure 1. 

FOR THE DIRECTOR: 

2 Encl 

a/s 

Copy furnished: 

AFADAE 

AFADAC 

Buy U. S. Savings Bonds -- Payroll Savings Plan! 
NRO APAROVE156FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

ADPE designated excess by SAFSL Message 011422Z Oct 69 not reported to DSA: 

2 ea - SDS 9300's at Valley Forge 

1 ea - SDS 930/2200 at Valley Forge 

2 ea - SDS Sigma 7's at Martin, Denver, Colo 

1 ea - IBM 360/44 (advise of status due O/a 1 Dec 69) 

4 ea - IBM 4 Pi systems 

ENCL 1
OFFICE OF THE SEURETARY OF DEFENSE

December 21, 1960
MEMO. For MR, CHRISTOPHER ff, RUSSELL

THE WHITE HOUSE

These items have also been forwarded
to Dr, Kistiakowsky,

v4 Attachment Lies

R-SV#ESIC
—SECREF-

thy erty ADDA

MLV Same
Sem" font. No, S-pace :

Re

06 - - C&O


2. Launch of DISCOVERER XIx, 4SEGRET)—

DISCOVERER XIX was launched from Vandenberg Air Force
Base at 1537 EST, 20 December 1960. Confirmation of orbit of this,
the 4th AGENA B and the second to be launched by a THOR DM-21, was
Obtained at 1704 EST, 20 December 1960. The planned and actual para-
meters for this satellite are as follows:

Planned Actual

Period 93.0 92.96

Perigee 113 nom, 103.9 nom,

Apogee 345 a.m, 348 nvm,

Eccentricity 032 - 033

Inclination 81,8° 83,439

The DISCOVERER payload for this flight operation will be a non-
recoverable MIDAS radiometer with an active orbit lifetime of 4 days.
This test will be first of a series of two radiometric engineering tests,

radiation data over more diversified areas of the world. These stations
are located at Cape Canaveral, Ascension Island, Thule, Greenland,

&

Lorban AGS ofr),

WA ¢$3 “he
SECRET DoD 12-21-60
-TOP-SECRETINCLININI NON ANNIOATIL @LOANING

LOS ININCTIVE SRN N Nta NOT UPPI?

Internal coma Ns

COPY Of COMM

PASS Of PAWLS

•

-TOPIECREF--

1St- NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

THE NRO STAFF September 7, 1972

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

SUBJECT: Meeting with John Walsh

This morning I met with John Walsh who has recently

left the National Security Council to become Deputy

Director of DDR&E for Defensive Systems.

My purpose in talking with him was to find out who

an appropriate individual might be on the NSC Staff who

would be willing to keep us informed of any NSCID activities

affecting the NRO. He told me that Dr. Andy Marshall would

be the best candidate. I found him to be highly aware of

our current problems with regard to the ASD(I). He is

very much opposed to Dr. Hall attempting to run our

program. I think he feels that a NSCID would be a great

idea but also feels that the current balance between the

sillitil

Department of Defense and good providing the more

costly programs, such can be funded. He said

that Dr. Dave Eliot has s place on the NSC Staff.

Dave Eliot has previously participated in 156 Committee

activities.

I offered John an updated briefing on the NRO since

it has been over a year since he was briefed. He said

that he would be delighted to receive such a briefing

from us.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Unified Western Grocers, Inc. (the Company) for
the fiscal quarter ended June 26, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alfred A. Plamann, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 3, 2004



/s/    ALFRED A.
PLAMANNAlfred A. PlamannPresident and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)




A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Zachariah Elliott *v.*William Holliday.

Ignorance of the act of 1777, *(Rev. c.*115, s. 75,) requiring appeal bonds to be executed in the court where they were allowed, will not entitle the appellant to a *certiorari.*

A cause between the parties had been tried in the County Court of Greene, where judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, and the defendant prayed an appeal, which was granted, and his sureties allowed. At the ensuing term of the Superior Court, before Martin, Judge, the plaintiff moved that the appeal be dismissed, because the appeal bond was not executed until after the term of the County Court at which it had been allowed. This fact being established, his Honor sustained the motion. The defendant then filed an affidavit, in which he swore that he was ignorant of the rule requiring the appeal bond to he executed during the term of the County Court; that he thought it sufficient if the appeal was allowed by the court, and that the bond might be executed at any time; that he had brought his sureties to the clerk during the term, hut finding him busy, he had, in consequence of his erroneous impression, requested them to attend after its expiration. The affidavit concluded with an averment of merits. His Honor upon these facts, awarded a *certiorari,*from which order the plaintiff appealed.

*W. C.*Stanly, for the plaintiff.

*Mordecai,*for the defendant.

Daniel, Judge,

after stating the substance of the affidavit, proceeded: Theactof 1777 *(Rev. c.*115s. 75,) requires the appellant to enter into bond, with two sufficient sureties before obtaining his appeal. The court is not only to judge of the sufficiency of the sureties, but to take the bond. The defendant does not come within any of the cases decided in this state. *(Chambers*v. *Smith,*1 *Hay,*366, *Collins*v. *Nall, ante*3 *vol.p.*224.) There does not appear to be any misconduct either in the court, or the clerk, no management, fraud, or contrivance by the ad*378verse party, nor any inability in the applicant to give-daring the term. The only reasons offered, are, that the defendant was ignorant of the law, and that the, plerk was very busy, and he did not wish to disturb him. It is a rule, that ignorance of the law excuses no man. If we were to sustain the certiorari, it would be opening the door for great negligence and fraud in parties applying for appeals, and perhaps perjuries in making affidavits. We think the order awarding the *certiorari*should be reversed.

Per Curiam. — Judgment’ reversed.
34 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

THE WHITE HOUSE 

ANnt.,:3: vl A 

BYEVIAN-Ls: 

CONTROL OVE.71-::;,1=3 ti"Cia 

WASHINGTON 

November 22, 1965 

0") 

Dear Al: 

I think that the recent Reconnaissance Panel meeting 

with you was a very productive one, particularly with 

respect to the discussion on MOL. I know that it was 

useful for us to know the questions that had arisen about 

the Panel intent and I hope you found the Panel's explanations equally helpful. I realize that the whole character 

of the MOL development will be determined by the Program 

Definition Studies now underway in the Air Force, and so 

I am especially interested that they accurately reflect the 

Panel's opinion. 

It occurs to me that it would be useful to have a 

summary of the points made by the Panel during the 

meeting which you could send to the key people on the 

definition program. The attached paper does, I believe, 

faithfully represent the Panel views and I would like to 

make it available to you for such use as you feel appropriate. 

Sincerely, 

Donald F. Hornig 

Special Assistant for 

Science and Technology 

Honorable Alexander H. Flax 

Assistant Secretary of the Air Force 

Pentagon, Room 4E968 

Washington, D. C. 

Enclosure
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


                AMERITRUCK DISTRIBUTION CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                     (In thousands, except ratio amounts)
                                  (unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                           Three Months Ended
                                               March 31,
                                           ------------------
                                            1997*      1996*
                                            -----      -----  
<S>                                         <C>        <C>
 
Earnings:
 Income (loss) before income taxes and      
  extraordinary item                        $(2,920)   $  212
                                            -------    ------
 
Fixed charges:
 Interest expense and amortization of
  debt discount and premium on all            
  indebtedness                                4,494     3,688 
 
 Portion of rent under long-term
  operating leases representative of an     
  interest factor                               683       380
                                            -------    ------ 
   Total fixed charges                        5,177     4,068
                                            -------    ------
 
Earnings before income taxes,               
 extraordinary item and fixed charges       $ 2,257    $4,280
                                            =======    ====== 

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1)            -     1.05x
                                            =======    ======
 
</TABLE>

(1)  The Company's earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $2,920
     for the three month period ended March 31, 1997.

*    Comparisons between periods are affected by acquisitions see Note 2
     contained in the unaudited Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J I N H ON G J I AN G, a . k . a . J I N H ON T J AING P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 74656 A ge nc yN o. A 072- 994- 299 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A pr i l5, 2010 ** B efo re: R Y M E R , M cK E O W N , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J i n H ong J i ang, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of C hi na , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s m ot i on t o r e ope n t o f i l e as uc c e s s i ve a s y l um appl i c a t i on. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f or 

# FI LED APR16 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 74656 2 ab u s e o f d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , P er ezv. Mukasey , 516 F . 3d 7 7 0 , 7 7 3 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 8 ) , an dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he agency di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng Ji ang’ s m ot i on t o reopen as un t i m el y bec ause Ji ang fi l ed i tov ert en ye ar s a ft erthe B IA i ss ued i t s f i nal r e m o v a l o r d e r , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 2 ) , an dJ ian g f a ile dto d e m o n s tr a te c h an g e dc i r c u ms t an c e s i n Ch i n at o q u a l i f yf o rth e r e g u l a t o rye x c e p t i o n t o th e t i me lim it f o rf ilin g m o tio n s to r e o p e n , se e 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 2(c) (3)( i i ); H e v . G on zales , 50 1 F . 3d 11 28 , 11 32 (9th C i r. 20 07 ). J ian g ’s ar g u m e n t th at h e is e n title dto f ile as u c c e s s iv e a s y lu m ap p lic a tio n is f or e c l os e d bythi s c ourt ’ s de c i s i on i n Chen v. Mukasey , 5 2 4 F .3 d1 0 2 8 , 1 0 3 2 ( 9 th C i r . 2008) ( the B I A r e a s onabl yc onc l ude d tha tan a l i e n c oul d f i l e as uc c e s s i ve a s y l u m ap p l i c a t i o n o n l yi n c o n n e c t i o n w i th amo t i o n t o r e o p e n , s ub j e c tt o th e t i me and n um ber l i m i t at i on s) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
     I, A.L. Giannopoulos, certify that:
     1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of MICROS Systems,Inc. (the “Registrant”);
     2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financialinformation included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
     4.     The Registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15(e)) [*clause omitted pursuant to SECRelease Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986*] for the Registrant and we have:
          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
          b) [*paragraph omitted pursuant to SECRelease Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986*];
          c) evaluated the effectiveness of theRegistrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
          d) disclosed in this report any change in theRegistrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
     5.     The Registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          a) all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   /s/ A.L. Giannopoulos             A.L. Giannopoulos
Exhibit 8.1
 List of Subsidiaries of SK Telecom Co., Ltd.
(As of December 31, 2008)
 Subsidiary Name
    
    Jurisdiction of IncorporationSK Broadband Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaSK Communications Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaSK Telink Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaSK Wyverns Baseball Club Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaPAXNet Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaF&U Credit information Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaLoen Entertainment, Inc.
    
    KoreaTU Media Corp.
    
    KoreaIHQ, Inc.
    
    KoreaNtreev Soft Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaCommerce Planet Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaThe First Music Investment Fund of SK-PVC
    
    KoreaThe Second Music Investment Fund of SK-PVC
    
    KoreaSK-KTB Music Investment Fund
    
    KoreaIMM Cinema Fund
    
    KoreaMichigan Global Cinema Fund
    
    KoreaSK i-media Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaCU Media, Inc.
    
    KoreaKonan Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaBroadband Media Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaHanaroDream Incorporated
    
    KoreaBroadband D&M Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaBroadband CS Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaEtoos Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaK-net Culture and Contents Venture Fund
    
    KoreaBenex Digital Cultural Contents Fund
    
    KoreaBenex
Focus Limited Partnership II
    
    KoreaOpen Innovation Fund
    
    KoreaSK Telecom China Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaULand Company Limited
    
    China (Hong Kong)SKT Vietnam Pte., Ltd.
    
    SingaporeSKT Americas, Inc.
    
    United StatesSK Telecom Advanced Tech & Service Center
    
    ChinaCyworld China Holdings Limited
    
    China (Hong Kong)SK Telecom China Holdings Co., Ltd.
    
    China
Exhibit 32.1



SPEEDCOM Wireless Corporation

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of SPEEDCOM Wireless Corporation (SPEEDCOM) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark Schaftlein, Chief Financial Officer of SPEEDCOM, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SPEEDCOM.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    MARK
SCHAFTLEIN                                    
|Mark Schaftlein                                           
|Chief Financial Officer and acting Chief Executive Officer
|                                                          
|February 11, 2004
iv? o4-,,,,c1 DAM-039652-70

0-6

CORONA SYSTEM

This photographic search and surveillance program is an outgrowth of the original Discoverer

Program. which first flew successfully in 1959 with 63 recoveries to date.

Lockheed furnishes the Agena vehicle and photographic payload section, and performs the launch

and payload recovery integration.

Associate Contractors: McDonnell Douglas - Thor Booster

ITEK - Primary Camera

Fairchild - Dual Improved Stellar Index Camera

General Electric - Recovery Vehicles (2)

Testing of the Agena and Forward Section is accomplished independently in Sunnyvale and a

. modified final systems test is conducted at Vandenberg AFB before launch. Upon missioncompletion, recovery vehicles are returned to Sunnyvale for equipment removal and refurbishment.

The film supply is forwarded to Eastman Kodak for processing.

The following photographs reflect the flight sequence of events, the Agena vehicle. and the

forward section hardware.

•

D,411111

activism. sr.

. • TOP SECRET •

'

' . .• ' . . •
•

i.111. 1, 44" • v..... IN,. • ••• • ••••• • NC •11•01/1/MIMANINII*0.1•WINIMNO

SEPARATION WECO

VECO

MECO •

STOP WECQ SEG

EMILE I

SWAT WECQ

STEM()

SOLO IACROR

EJECTION

SOUD MOTOR

BURN OUT

SNP V/ECO STEERING

. AGM $ ENABLE vim

S TARE TE a 0

AGDIA

SHUTDOWN

(BY *M

MEM

IGNITION

ORBITAL PITCH

ROE START

C. 4'/MIN)

• ; • 'WIN:

.i.*•••• •

LIFT

OFF

CONTROL It

NANDIJIE . _ Imo TOP SECRET 

-'p6': -?.

ASCENT SEQUENCE OF EVENTS (U)
CHUTE COVER OFF

DECELERATION CHUTE

DEPLOYED f HEAT SHIELD

SEPARATION

MAIN CHUTE

MA/N CHUTE FULL

OPNE Sorwoo FTIt

De111:1 :657_71

... ..

,r1 

S[ 3L I C ET

RECOVERY SEQUENCE OF EVENTS (U)

ORBIT -

REEFED DEPLOYED

ORBITAL TRACK

T/C •

SEPARATION

4

REENTRY

"••••nn....

.11 -

ft.42#•

/

AIR RECOVERY '!4

a000 FT

ONTOL11111111 i7 TOP SECRET

Page 5

is

Denied in full
11

::0110IIA VORMARD RACK I vi

De

I •

TOP SECRET ::•

•

CORONA SYS rf:m IN s ysTENI rEs: cox' !:;t : Icx :
HANDLE .00*

covancm. s

r EXPLODED CORONA SYSTEM LESS SUPPLY CA.S.SETTE Tr 7:3
11....Nr•••"""

•1,4.- • •

CONSTANT ROTA TOR CAMERA ASSEM BLY IN TEST FRAME

► ANDLE vi

CONTROL S" A 7:7 

i 01-%-;"--*
—7 •

:.1

TOP SECR7-1

essrees„,,,,,rfir,...rffigrer••==='°"-'

L. • .

•

_Or

.7

.--* •

),••• 1—

4 4 rt ,y....A.

, - --- '

\ .:

S.

•••

at

MA:: CAMERA FI SI' PPLY ASSEMII LY LOOKING FOR WARD'

I vi

S ySTEm ONLN %.1 am I.. • .
LUi

1 •

•

•

•

•

I

4

:MPROVED STI'LLAR INDEX I DLSICI CAMERA iN -TEST

FRA" I' FILM SUPPLY AT LEFT. CAMERA AT BoTTox:

CENTER. CI'T AND SPLICE DEVICE ON RIGHT. 41.

-• ANDLE V

.7.LINTRO:
RECOVERY VEHICLE COMPLETE. RETRO ROCKET MOTOR AT TOP

•

HANDLE V

CONTROL S ONLY

•

••••n••••n•••...11•nnn••••••••n.0.1.11../..wm.s.

;NO 4E10 •

wry, WO wit ...VI*.
TOP S.v.tc.i

I.•

- •

. z.v.t? L:

•

1.wf,

en% t,"."

'F•7f.%4 

titEC:OVERY CAPSULE iDISIC 

%V ATEli SEAL AT T.OPi

•
•

i U; •

.77?—r.•

I :V F: FORE:BODY • :IF EV: 7: Ef." Rh: I.

••e• ••:;: L

. T L.

•
• rt .." ••••r•

CONTROL

HANDLE IIIIN PARACHUTE COVER WITH SF:CTION OF DISIC CHUTE ATTACHED. RF:COVERY PARACHUTE ON RIGHT.

TOP SF.CRET