alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRO APF/e0VED FOR 

1 RELEASE 1 JULY42015 DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

WASHINGTON 

• MAR 2 5 1964 

Dear John: 

We have noted with considerable interest the development 

of plans for an MOL (Military Orbital Laboratory). While we 

have not as yet received a copy of the NASA-IMOD agreement' 

establishing primary responsibility for this project, we assume 

that Defense is, in fact, the responsible agency. Formal 

indication of this responsibility may facilitate coordination 

and provision of guidance as to foreign policy implications 

of the program. In the meantime, I am writing' informally to 

suggest that public affairs handling of the MOL program will 

require careful attention and will ihvolve considerable . 

modification of the general prohibition on public release 

of information about military apace activities (DOD Directive 

S-5200.13). 

I am not at this time recommending any particular course 

of handling. However, in view of the fact that a good deal 

of information about the MOL has already been made public 

through Congressional hearings and public statements, it would 

clearly not be reasonable to expect that the general character.. 

istics,. purpose and success or failure of its launches will not' 

be made'public. I am, therefore, inclined to believe that most 

aspects of the MOL program will have to be conducted with 

reasonable openness. At the same time, there maybe ampr,ets 

which it would be preferable to put under specific restraints. 

In short, I believe the MOL program requires specific guidelines 

of its own for public affairs handling and in turn may pose 

particular foreign policy issues. 

. I hope you will be able to institute preliminary considers-. 

tion of this 0.ucution within the Department of Defense and get 

in touch with us soon to determine the beat course of coordination. 

Sincerely, 

The Honorable 

Jeffrey C. Kitchen 

Deputy Assistant Secretary 

for Politico-Military Affairs 

John T. Mc Naughton. 

Assistant Secretary for international Securityl sAfare,,A 

Department of Defense. ; ) >/ 

j, /..0
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FICCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          22,479
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,433
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,256
<PP&E>                                         109,659
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,422
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          526,861
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,371
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,020,609)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   142,623
<SALES>                                          2,010
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,510
<CGS>                                            1,250
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,005
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,138,061
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,110,556)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,105,068)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (5,488)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,110,556)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
U

.S

. Department of T ransportation Federal Aviation Administration

July 1, 2015

Mr. Thomas A. Enyart Manager, Certification & Airworthiness The Boeing Company Boeing Commercial Airplanes Southern California Engineering Design Center 2401 E. Wardlow Road , Mail Code D800-0022 Long Beach, CA 90807-5309

Dear Mr. Enyart: Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Avenue , S

.W. Renton , Washington 98057-3356

We have received your letter no. CP-L4L-15-00122 , dated May 1, 2015 , petitioning for exemption from the requirements ofTitle 14, Code ofFederal Regulations (14 CFR) 26.21 (b)(2)(ii). The exemption, if granted, would provide relief from the FAA-approved binding schedule, for Boeing Model DC-8 airplanes , which identifies those maintenance actions for which service information has not been mandated by airworthiness directive as ofJanuary 14, 2011. Your petition, which you submitted to the Department ofTransportation's Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) at regulations.gov, is in docket no . FAA-2015-1669. We are in the process of reviewing your request, and will contact you if we need additional information. If you have questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process , please contact Walt Sippel at 425-227-2774 , or e-mail walt.sippel @ faa.gov. Sincerely,

Mark Forseth Transport Airplane Directorate Aircraft Certification Service
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 141 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 141

To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
       Act providing for the Independent Payment Advisory Board.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 8, 2015

   Mr. Cornyn (for himself, Ms. Ayotte, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Blunt, Mr. 
 Boozman, Mr. Burr, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Coats, Mr. Cochran, Ms. Collins, 
    Mr. Crapo, Mr. Daines, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Flake, Mr. Graham, Mr. 
Grassley, Mr. Heller, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Johnson, 
Mr. Kirk, Mr. Moran, Mr. Paul, Mr. Portman, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Rubio, Mr. 
 Scott, Mr. Thune, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Toomey, and Mr. Wicker) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                               on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 
       Act providing for the Independent Payment Advisory Board.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Seniors' Access to 
Medicare Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE INDEPENDENT PAYMENT ADVISORY BOARD.

    Effective as of the enactment of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148), sections 3403 and 10320 of 
such Act (including the amendments made by such sections) are repealed, 
and any provision of law amended by such sections is hereby restored as 
if such sections had not been enacted into law.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE REGISTRANT, 
PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13a  14(a) OR
17 CFR 240.15d  14(a)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K (Amendment No. 1) of Dynamex Inc.; and2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statements of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this annual report.
 Date: November 18, 2010/s/ James L. WelchName:
    James L. WelchTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer
Brigadier General, USAF •

Director

--TOP-SECIE-- 

---4-111"M.11411M

Jointly

-*NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C. 411114111MOMM

THE NRO STAFF dctdber 11, 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR ME. INLOW, COMIREK

SUBJECT: Modification of TIE Controls for the Products

of Photographic Reconnaissance Satellites

This is to respond to your memorandum of September 28,

1973 (TCS-899569-73). I would be pleased to serve on a

Steering Group as you proposed in your memorandum. I believe

that utmost. care must be exercised on the part of the

intelligence community in implementing any modification

to the existing TALENT-KEYHOLE System. ay particular attention to the ultimate impact stem

parameters caused by this action. Also that

we must strive toward explicit and unambiguous guidance

being made available to the field so that the Government

and contractors do not become confused as to the real scope

and intent of the decompartment action.

Please contact me as soon as you desire to convene the

Steering Group. I am in the process of identifying an

appropriate group of representatives to work area 3b as

outlined in your September 26 draft memorandum. .

VW*

Sooty museu

15SKSOM1119 11111.11117. TOHECRETS eat m come of t

nt y
#### Zeinert, Appellant, vs. Zeinert, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the county court of Shawano county dated September 25, 1926: F. A. Jaeci-cel, Judge.

Judgment in favor of plaintiff. Plaintiff appeals from that part of the judgment relating to division of defendant’s estate.

For the appellant: *Dillett & Fischer*of Shawano.

For the respondent: *W. D. Haseltine*of Wittenberg, attorney, and *Winter & Winter*of Shawano, of counsel.

*By the Court.-*— -Judgment affirmed.
TOP-SECREF

Ini.1.0110 F•011 41110106•IC 

xc 3.PTC ••.L 2, son Mr AM.: •

co... Internal 

mivq,V

YI &Meet alitgaht III as es

-TOP-SECRET1.43/- NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

THE NRO STAFF DeceMber 14, 1970

MEMORANDUM FOR COLONEL

DR. NAKA

SUBJECT: Verification Papers

As I have mentioned to you previously, several

papers which I have reviewed relative to SALT, which

have been drafted by CIA in response to NSC questioning,

have expressed an overly optimistic tone (in my view)

with regards to verification systems. In the Mobile

ICBM and Fixed ICBM papers, we have caused some

pessimism to be added so as not to express a totally

optimistic view toward the capability of our systems.

S e e been the capabilities of

d NRT. No mention is made

of ca as p Lmit of sermon and bad

weather, and other technical problems which might

beset the photo systems.

This morning I reviewed another paper, "Strategic

Forces Survivability Study: Verification" which also

deals with the SALT environment as well as with the

nature of our defensive posture. This paper extolls

the virtues of all of our systems, SIGINT included.

s great claims for

T as well as

systems

A t •ug t ere was some caution interjected in this

paper with regards to concealment and subtle upgrading,

I feel that the overall tone would lead the National

Security Council to place "blind" faith in our ability

to be able to collect the information necessary for

verification and defensive posture planning.
TOVSECREF

If ther unding of NRT for

1975 and o ,hen I feel that

there must xercised in these

planning pipers.

Recommendation: In your dealings at the high policy

level, you should be aware of the optimism being

expressed to the National Security Counpil. In the

briefing to Dr. Kissinger some explanation should be

made as to the limits of our systems so that false

faith will not prevail.

9 •

Major, USAF

TOP-SECRETcat.Lers ► •0• Avoil • c etr,I*o.s

7•OicT C SP se • 3 sees Nol ..•1,
# L_2015300EN.01000301.xml

| 17.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 300/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 300/3

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/2044

of 16 November 2015

implementing Article 13 of Regulation (EU) No 356/2010 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain natural or legal persons, entities or bodies, in view of the situation in Somalia

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 356/2010 of 26 April 2010 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain natural or legal persons, entities or bodies, in view of the situation in Somalia (1), and in particular Article 13 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 26 April 2010, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 356/2010. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 26 April 2010, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 356/2010.

| (2) | On 11 March 2014, the United Nations Security Council Committee established pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 751 (1992) and UNSCR 1907 (2009) deleted one person from the list of persons subject to the restrictive measures set out in paragraphs 1, 3 and 7 of UNSCR 1844 (2008). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 11 March 2014, the United Nations Security Council Committee established pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 751 (1992) and UNSCR 1907 (2009) deleted one person from the list of persons subject to the restrictive measures set out in paragraphs 1, 3 and 7 of UNSCR 1844 (2008).

| (3) | Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 356/2010 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 356/2010 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 356/2010 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the date following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 November 2015.

For the Council

The President

F. MOGHERINI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 105, 27.4.2010, p. 1.

1

---

ANNEX

The entry for the following person is deleted from Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 356/2010:

Jim'ale, Ali Ahmed Nur

---
Pysical Property testing on SPECFLEX* NS 648LD at various densities

2008 GM2781M 299327299328 299329 Avg units Target Core Density kg/m372-88 max. 42 45 47 47 Tensile Strength kPa 82 min. 126 127 133 132 Elongation % 85 min. 101 97 102 104 Tear Strength N/m 120 min. 160 213 248 236 Compression Set (50%) % Ct 25 max. 21 24 16 16 HACS (50%) % Ct 35 max. 16 15 12 12 25% IFD N 120 - 190 97 123 152 154 65% IFD N 280 - 470 340 352 423 418 Flammability FMVSS302SelfExtinguishing SE SE SE Tear Strength ASTM D624 Die C (Ford WSB-M2D456-A) N/mCode 1 - 200 Code 2 - 400 Code 3 - 600 487 496 510 485 Tear Strength ASTM D624 Die C (Chrysler MS-AY-352<S>) N/mCode B - 500 487 496 510 485

Flammability FMVSS302SENBR = 2 samples per pad were tested. All samples either burned out before reaching the first marker that would start the timer, or burned out right after reaching the first marker so that no sample had a burn rate.299330 299331 Avg 299332

47 51 51 51 131 134 130 126 105 105 99 92 224 255 254 253 15 13 14 15 12 10 11 11 155 177 176 175 413 482 477 473 SE SE SE

460 460 473 486

460 460 473 486

SENBR = 2 samples per pad were tested. All samples either burned out before reaching the first marker that would start the timer, or burned out right after reaching the first marker so that no sample had a burn rate.SENBR = 2 samples per pad were tested. All samples either burned out before reaching the first marker that would start the timer, or burned out right after reaching the first marker so that no sample had a burn rate.
October 19, 2012 

Mr. David L. Potts 

131 Llanfair Lane NW 

New Philadelphia, OH 44663 

Dear Mr. Potts: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§ 21.191(i)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can’t 

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can’t Process Your Request 

We entered your September 17, 2012, exemption request into the public docket 

(FAA-2012-1024), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information 

you sent doesn’t comply with the requirements of 14 CFR § 11.81(d) or (e) (copy enclosed). 

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we 

receive this required information from you. Please note that 14 CFR § 11.63(d) requires you 

to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the 

exemption. 
2 

If We Don’t Hear From You 

If we don’t hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda. D. Courtney 

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries of Gold Banc Corporation, Inc.

|GBCI Capital Trust, a Delaware business trust                                                                                                                                         
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|GBCI Capital Trust II, a Delaware business trust                                                                                                                                      
|Gold IHC-II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Gold RE Holdings-II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company                                                                 
|CompuNet Engineering, Inc., a Kansas corporation                                                                                                                                      
|Regional Holding Company, Inc., a Kansas corporation
Gold Banc Mortgage, Inc., a Kansas corporation
Realty Escrow Services, Inc. a Kansas corporation                                 
|Gold Financial Services, Inc.
The Trust Company
Gold Capital Management, Inc.
Gold Insurance Agency, Inc.
Gold Merchant Banc, Inc.
Gold Investment Advisors, Inc.                     
|GBC Kansas, Inc., a Kansas corporatione
Gold Bank, a Kansas bank
  Gold IHC, Inc., a Nevada corporation
    Gold RE Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation                              
|Provident Bank, f.s.b., a federal savings bank
Gold IHC-1, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
  Gold RE Holdings-I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company                  
|GBC Oklahoma, Inc., a Kansas corporation
Gold Bank, Hennessey, Oklahoma, an Oklahoma bank
  GoldBK Holdings, Inc.
  Central Oklahoma Leasing Authority, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation
|GBC Florida, Inc. a Kansas corporation
American Bank, a Florida bank
ABI Capital Trust, a Delaware business trust                                                                     
|Gold Banc Acquisition Corporation VIII, Inc., a Kansas corporation                                                                                                                    
|Gold Banc Acquisition Corporation X, Inc., a Kansas corporation                                                                                                                       

---

QuickLinks
40P-SECIET-

-tetNATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 11.1101111111111.111

WASHINGTON. D.C. .

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR 13 June 1975

WOMEN

MEMORANDUM FOR COLONEL WHEELER .

MR. HILL

SUBJECT: OMB Meeting

This memo is written to record the primary discussion items

and few action items resulting from my luncheon meeting with Don

Ogilvie. The bulk of the time was spent discussing OMB's relationship to the bank. Basically, OMB feels they are not part

of the meeting and that their opinion on issues is not desired.

I countered that the HBO presentation is to the entire official

group present, not just the principals, and that I have. in the

past, been surprised at the lack of contribution by participants.

I urged OMB to become properly knowledgeable about the issues and

to use the meeting to state their case even if only in a minority

report. This led to discussion of individual participation.

Ogilvie thought that he was being left out of all pre-meetings.

I advised him that most of the preparation for the principals was

done by their individual staffs, not by NRO, and that I felt that

he might, by proper representation, be invited to a number of the

important pre-meetings.

He countered by requesting that we keep in mind that it

would serve our purpose to have OMB properly briefed on the

issues and that we should try to assist in having him invited to

important meetings.

Relative to data submittals requested by Jim Holt, he agreed

with my statement that raw data should not be submitted (e.g.,

field submittals) to OMB, but that sorted data would be appropriate

(e.g., prefinalised program data by Jim Hill). Relative to long

lists to questions typified by Holt's "General HRO Questions"

of April 30th, Ogilvie also agreed that generally these are not

appropriate and further, that any such list should be broken down

to those which can be answered, those which require special work

411111111111 Claim aZ s Cal •

ascutivt Goose mat tUMMON CATS -1111P-ECIE-- SrS1CM SOON Nif NICLNISIII • es Iwo Olt

CONTROL. NO

COPY OF COPIES

PACIE,L.OP 2 PAGES
-TP—SECRETCO l YSTEM

to be answered, or those which are not appropriate questions.

He felt that it is proper for us to require more formal requests,

but not necessarily in writing.

cubsemp 411111111111Lawly seals ccmaTitcm. 

_

Of COPIES

OlMW viacureve sectaariscAmou Iceassuut ot 

am. mei 11•111ernies COM

for—stati—

saw esc► maso• soar Du Cr:::—TOF—r- PAGES

• ' ' • "'"7-:**--;"!