alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         248,607
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,930
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               270,537
<PP&E>                                       1,508,432
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,035,332
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 743,637
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     743,637
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   743,637
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               101,105
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,285
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   104,784
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
MICHAEL LAWRENCE CASSIDY , Appellant,

v. STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D 15

- 868

_____________________________/ Opinion filed November 5, 2015. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. Michael Flowers , Judge

. Michael Lawrence Cassidy, pro se , Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kathryn Lane, Assistant Att orney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.
We previously affirmed Appellant’s judgment and sentence on his direct appeal. Cassidy v. State , 130 So. 3d 229 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (table). We now affirm the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s p etition for writ of habeas corpus

. Baker v. State , 878 So. 2d 1236, 1245 (Fla. 2004) (“The remedy of habeas corpus2 is not available in Florida to obtain the kind of collateral postconviction relief available in the sentencing court pursuant to rule 3.850.” )

. This affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant’s seeking relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 on his claim s regarding count 3 of his j udgment and

s entence

. See Thomas v. State , 935 So. 2d 91 , 91 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). We do no t pass upon the viability or merits of Appellant’s claims , which is for the trial court’s determination if the claims are properly presented

. A ny motion filed under Rule 3.850 must comply with the content and certification requirements of the rule

. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(b), (b)(1), (c), (h), (n) . I n most circumstances, it must be filed within two years after issuance of mandate

. Breland v. State , 58 So. 3d 326, 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (two

- year time limit under Rule 3.850 commences upon appellate court’s i ssuance of mandate)

. In Appellant’s direct appeal, mandate issued on February 7, 2014; therefore, the two years within which to file a motion under Rule 3.850 will expire on February 7, 2016. Court records indicate that Appellant filed an amended motion u nder Rule 3.850 after filing the present habeas petition, the contents of which are not before this Court . If not already asserted in the recent amended motions under Rule 3.850 , Appellant may
assert his claims regarding count 3 in a timely and facially s ufficient motion that complies with Rule 3.850. WOLF and KELSEY, JJ., concur; THOMAS, J., concurs in result only.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                          10,552
<SECURITIES>                                    44,995
<RECEIVABLES>                                  237,907
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,722
<INVENTORY>                                    220,215
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               421,794
<PP&E>                                         267,602
<DEPRECIATION>                                 144,052
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 734,539
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          286,868
<BONDS>                                        260,576
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        77,588
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,618
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   734,539
<SALES>                                      2,299,957
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,299,957
<CGS>                                        2,047,226
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,277,684
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,658
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,307)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,735)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,572)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,572)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.3


                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form F-3 No. 333-7284, No. 333-14102 and No. 333-91034) of SK Telecom Co., Ltd.
and in the related Prospectus of our report dated January 25, 2002, with respect
to the financial statements of Shinsegi Telecomm, Inc., included in this
Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of SK Telecom Co., Ltd. for
the year ended December 31, 2002.



/s/ Young Wha

Young Wha Corporation


Seoul, Korea
June 30, 2003
NRO Announces FIA Contract Winner

September 3, 1999 

The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) awarded a contract to the Boeing Company, Seal 

Beach, Calif., to develop, provide launch integration and operate the nation's next generaton of 

imagery reconnaissance satellites. This award is the largest and last element of the NRO's Future 

Imagery Architecture program.

The multi-year effort will provide a more capable but less costly means of fulfilling the nation's 

imagery needs and includes the ability to accommodate commercial products. The contract cost 

is classified. Satellite development begins in the middle of the next decade. 

In April, the NRO announced that Raytheon Systems Company won the contract for deployment 

and integration of the ground infrastructure portion of the Future Imagery Architecture, known as 

the Mission Integration and Development (MIND) Program.
Cite as: Opinion No. 95-022 (July 6, 1995)

(unpublished)

AGRICULTURE ) AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION )

LANDOWNER'S DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS

July 6, 1995

The Honorable Lewis R. Riley

Secretary of Agriculture

You have requested our opinion regarding the development rights of a landowner under §2-

513(b) of the Agriculture Article, Maryland Code. Specifically, your question is whether certain

landowners have a right to construct a dwelling for their child's use on land that is subject to an

easement under the Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Program. These landowners had a sales

contract to buy the land in question at the time that the easement was sold to the Agricultural Land

Preservation Foundation by the prior landowners. The successor landowners were not parties to the

sale of the easement. 

In a recent letter of advice (copy attached), Assistant Attorney General Craig A. Nielsen,

Counsel to the Department of Agriculture, advised that the only persons entitled to construct a

dwelling for a child on the land are the ones who actually sold the easement to the Foundation.

Successor landowners have no such right, even if they had an equitable interest in the land at the time

that the easement was sold. 

We have carefully reviewed the matter and agree with Mr. Nielsen's analysis and conclusion.

J. Joseph Curran, Jr.

Attorney General

Jack Schwartz

Chief Counsel

 Opinions & Advice
**Exhibit 23.2****CONSENT OF NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.**We consent to the references to us and to estimates of reserves contained in “Part I, Item 1and 2. Business and Properties — Natural Gas and Oil Reserves” in this Annual Report on Form10-K of The Houston Exploration Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 and in HoustonExploration’s previously filed Registration Statements (and any prospectus supplement thereto)with file numbers as follows: (i) 333-78843 dated May 20, 1999, 333-113659 dated March 16,2004 and 333-120000 dated December 3, 2004, on Form S-3; (ii) 333-106836 dated December 4,2003 and 333-140532 dated February 8, 2007, on Form S-4; and (iii) 333-36977 dated October 1,1997, 333-47370 dated October 5, 2000, 333-59698 dated April 27, 2001, 333-75264 datedDecember 17, 2001, 333-99799 dated September 19, 2002 and 333-117789 dated July 30, 2004, onForm S-8.         NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.           /s/ Danny D. Simmons                Executive Vice President  Houston, Texas
STEVEN L. BALDWIN,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-3868

Opinion filed October 24, 2017. 

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Steven L. Baldwin, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as unauthorized. See Baker 

v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004). 

ROBERTS, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 99.2


                      MELLON BANK CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST

                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE


         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Citibank (South
Dakota), N.A., as Successor Servicer ("Citibank (South Dakota)"), pursuant to
the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 1, 1995, (as may be
amended, from time to time, the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), as
supplemented by the Series 1995-A Supplement (as amended and Supplemented, the
"Series Supplement"), relating to the Mellon Bank Credit Card Master Trust (the
"Trust"), each among Citibank (South Dakota) N.A., as Successor Servicer and
Transferor, and the Bank of New York, as Trustee, does hereby certify that:

         1. Citibank (South Dakota) is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer
under the Agreement.

         2. The undersigned is a Servicing Officer who is duly authorized
pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the
Trustee.

         3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the year ended
December 31, 1999, and of its performance under the Agreement was conducted
under my supervision.

         4. Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge,
performed in all material respects its obligations under the Agreement
throughout such year and no default in the performance of such obligations has
occurred or is continuing.

         Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective
meanings as set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate
this 22nd day of March, 2000.


                                        CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A.


                                        By: /s/    Charles Haug
                                            -------------------------
                                            Name:  Charles Haug
                                            Title: Servicing Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,776,328
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,819,743
<PP&E>                                         244,377
<DEPRECIATION>                                 127,616
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,986,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          317,998
<BONDS>                                      2,600,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,142
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,013,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,986,062
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               222,289
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,372,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             117,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,332,801)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,332,801)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,332,801)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.43)
        

</TABLE>
----

Removal from the register of Case C-424/03 (1)

(2004/C 314/25)

By order of 23 September 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-424/03: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain.

----

(1) OJ C 275 of 15.11.2003.

----
IJJi 

Policy: 18 Points 

Security: Policy V 

raglagUER07- 

sins A 

SS-1 

SS-2 

3S-3 tt .. 

' SS-4 

SS—b 

SS-6 

is SS-7 

SS-8 

So-9 

"sic 

co off -.o 

'265° 

volVe 

OleNRO APPROVED roR 

RELEASE 1JULY2015 

FTA777 

• 247/190415Z 

xxxxx 

EE YEKALH 247 18/21.162 OCT 

R 182s56.7 

FM 

TO STATE RCI 

INFO CIA 

SAFSS 

ZEM 

BYEMAN, TALENT-KEYHOLE CITE OPCEN 7524 

REF STATE RCI 122242Z 12 OCTOBER 65 

DIRECTOR OF SECURITY/CIA ANC CHAIRMAN/COMDR HAVE REVIEWED 

PROBLEM OF CLASSIFICATION CF 6 OCT DEPT OF STATE MEMO "AN OFFER 

OF INSPECTION OF THE MOL." IN THEIR OPINION THE DEPT HAS MADE A 

WILLFUL ATTEMPT AT SANITIZATION OF THE TALENT-KEYHOLE 

INFORMATION. UNFORTUNATELY, HOWEVER, THERE IS SOME QUESTION 

THAT THIS SANITIZATION HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETELY SUCCESSFUL IN 

CONCEALING IMPLICATION OF THE INTELLICENCE VALUE OF OVERHEAD 

RECONNAISSANCE. IN VIE' Cr THE SENSITIVITY OF OVERHEAD 

RECONNAIsSANCE, IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THIS MATTER BE RESOLVED 

FULLY BEFORE GENERAL USE IS MACE OF THE DOCUMENT OUTSIDE OF 

THE TALENT CONTROL SYSTEM. IT HAS BEEN POINTED OUT, HOWEVER, 

THAT THERE ARE ESTABLISHED PROCEDURES FOR THE SANITIZATION OF 

0.1CH INFORMATION AND THAT RELATIVELY MINOR REVIEW ANC 

ACJUSTmENT HIGHT MAKE IT POSSIBLE To PRODUCE AN ADEQUATE 

SANITIZATION WHICH WOULD MEET THE DEPT'S NEEDS. THE TALENT 

SANITIZATION MANUAL DATED 19 FEB 62 PROVIDES THAT 

SANITIZATION WILL BE ACM:PUSHED wITHIN THE TALENT CONTROL 

SYSTEM. THIS PERMITS TALENT INFORMATION TO BE HELD UNDER 

HAxIMUM SECURITY UNTIL ITIS COMPLETELY CLEAR THAT ALL PROPER 

PRECAUTIONS HAVE BEEN TAKEN, IT IS REQUESTED, THEREFORE, THAT 

UNTIL IT HAS BEEN AGREED THAT ADEQUA.TE SANITIZATION HAS BEEN 

ACCO'M'PLISHED, THE INFORMATION PE RETURNED TO THE TALENT 

CONTROL 3Y PLACING ALL COPIES OF THE STATE DEPT MEMO fN THE 

WENT CONTROL SYSTEM. IT IS SUGGESTED, HOWEVER, THAT THE DEPT 

SJBMIT THE MEMO TO THE COMOR AS A SANITIZATION PRODLEM AND THAT 

almOR REVIEW AND HAKE SUCH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGES AS 

WOULD MAKE IT SUITABLE FOR PUBLICATION AS A SANITIZED DOCUMENT, 

AT THE SECRET LEVEL. 

05-1 

3n
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7206

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ADRIAN CHAVEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior 

District Judge. (5:11-cr-00342-F-1)

Submitted: December 17, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Adrian Chavez, Appellant Pro Se. Dena Janae King, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Adrian Chavez appeals the district court’s order denying 

his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Chavez, No. 5:11-cr00342-F-1 (E.D.N.C. July 2, 2015). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1214 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1214

  To prevent human health threats posed by the consumption of equines 
                      raised in the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 6, 2015

 Mr. Menendez (for himself, Mr. Graham, Ms. Collins, and Ms. Mikulski) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prevent human health threats posed by the consumption of equines 
                      raised in the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``John Rainey Memorial Safeguard 
American Food Exports (SAFE) Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that--
            (1) unlike cows, pigs, and other domesticated species, 
        horses and other members of the equidae family are not raised 
        for the purpose of human consumption;
            (2) equines raised in the United States are frequently 
        treated with substances that are not approved for use in horses 
        intended for human consumption and equine parts are therefore 
        unsafe within the meaning of section 409 of the Federal Food, 
        Drug, and Cosmetic Act;
            (3) equines raised in the United States are frequently 
        treated with drugs, including phenylbutazone, acepromazine, 
        boldenone undecylenate, omeprazole, ketoprofen, xylazine, 
        hyaluronic acid, nitrofurazone, polysulfated glycosaminoglycan, 
        clenbuterol, tolazoline, and ponazuril, which are not approved 
        for use in horses intended for human consumption and equine 
        parts are therefore unsafe within the meaning of section 512 of 
        the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; and
            (4) consuming parts of an equine raised in the United 
        States likely poses a serious threat to human health and the 
        public should be protected from these unsafe products.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITIONS.

    Section 301 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
331) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(ddd) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section--
            ``(1) equine parts shall be deemed unsafe under section 409 
        of this Act;
            ``(2) equine parts shall be deemed unsafe under section 512 
        of this Act; and
            ``(3) the knowing sale or transport of equines or equine 
        parts in interstate or foreign commerce for purposes of human 
        consumption is hereby prohibited.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Kondratowicz and others, Appellants, vs. Misun and another, Respondents.

For the appellants : *Shannon & Higgins*of Kenosha.

For the respondents: *Sanborn, Lamoreux & Pray*of Ashland, and *C. F. Morris*of Washburn.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 10.2.1

To the Securities and Exchange Commission:

     We received a letter from Arthur Andersen LLP (Andersen), dated March 29,
2002, representing that the audit was subject to their quality control system
for the United States accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable
assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional
standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working
on the audit and availability of national office consultation, and availability
of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen to conduct the relevant portions
of the audit.

                                   QIAGEN N.V.

                                   By:    /s/ Peer M. Schatz
                                       --------------------------------------
Dated:  March 29, 2002             Peer M. Schatz, Chief Financial Officer