alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Helgerson, Respondent, vs. Uphoff and wife, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Richmond, Jackman, Wilkie & Toe-baas*of Madison.

For the respondent: *Hill, Thomann & Beckwith*of Madison.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.

The following memorandum was filed June 24, 1929:

Per Curiam.

The mandate of April 30th is modified by deducting from the amount of the judgment the sum of $177.50, and, as so modified, affirmed.
#### The State ex rel. Roy, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Roy v. Indus. Comm.*(1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 384.]

(No. 98-2305

Submitted June 22, 1999

Decided September 8, 1999.)

*William D. Snyder & Associates*and *John Lesko,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Steven P. Fixler,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Industrial Commission and Administrator, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation.

*Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, L.L.P.,*and *Cynthia C. Felson,*for appellee Henry J. Kaiser Company.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas, J., dissents.

Resnick, J., dissents.

Alice Robie Resnick, J.,

dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
. • .

DEFRAIMMIT OY TEE Am roan

READOUT= UNITED STATICS AIR FORCE

DIRECTORATE MP REWIRININTS

OOR NO. 80.2

DATE Sep 26, 1958

*

4S) AN ADDER= TO A

GOR FCE

A RECONNAISSANCE SATELLITE =POE MEN

* • * *

• 

*

VU. OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE.

*

* *

K. Electronic Reconnoissance Subsystem

1., General

The electronic reconnaissance subsystem must

provide the ability to intercept electromagnetic emissions from potential

enemies, to return the intercepted information in a secure manner,

to an appropriate location, and to record this information in a faro

suitable for further processing.

Development of the electronic reconnaissance

satellite will involve maxima equipment progression, utilizing stateof-the-amt equipment without inhibitions of past techniques and custom

on intercept, recording, and processing. The most advanced equipment

possible must be employed as early in the program as is permissible

within operational considerations and equipment availability.

c. Operational Characteristics

The electronic reconnaissance subsystem should

provide electronic reconnaissance intercept equipment in the band

of frequencies between 30 nos and 40 knee in easily substituted

modular form. f • e s D eb 'kW S

Emphasis will be placed on the interception

of new or unusual signals for technical intelligence as opposed to

the requirements set forth in Pert I of Volume III of the USAF ITACIT

Objectives and Requirements List, 4 Dec 1957.

D g ST- 4744 C 2.

)(10
The capability of interception of not only pulseiU4, FM and unusual modulations will be provided.

should be preserved to the greatest extent possible

The system or systems should have the capability

:h deviate from the known. On detection of

should be made for stop-start receiver scan

)1d and record such signals as long as possible.

It is desired that the direction finding

-s to within five miles. Bovever, this

:grade high order technical collection, nor

Llity.

She system should be developed to -allow ;rot equipments to select areas of interest versus

ncern during any given orbit. This includes

if desired, when the satellite is over areas

A capability of storing intercepted data from

it to facilitate the readout during a later

Liout station should be provided.

A system to continually provide calibration data

usications subsystem and to the data processing

Lded. This calibration data is necessary for

A reliable intelligence information possible

:roprisite ground support equipment must be

and calibrate all elements of this subsystem.

JAMES FERGO3ON

MaJor General, USAF

Director of Requirements

PCS, Development
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          61,555
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,038
<ALLOWANCES>                                       379
<INVENTORY>                                      6,364
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,641
<PP&E>                                         354,083
<DEPRECIATION>                                  68,058
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 372,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,641
<BONDS>                                        195,764
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     100,677
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   372,346
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               195,987
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  118,563
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                56,065
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,236
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,436
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,617
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,819
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,819
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
B. R. DAffGHTRE 

Colonel, USAF 

Executive Ass istan 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

MEMORANDUM 

March 9, 1966 

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. FLAX 

Dr. Brown, after reading the 

proposed memo from General Evans concerning the MOL Program, commented that 

the memo, as written, is not clear and 

discusses only the PSAC changes. Dr. 

Brown stated that the memo should mention 

the slippage and the reasons since there 

is a difference of approximately nine (9) 

months. 

Would you please rewrite the memo 

for the Secretary?
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions (NUREG-1600)

On this page: 
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1600 (PDF 4.58 MB) 

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** May 2000**Date Published:** May 2000

Office of Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This document includes the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's or Commission's) revised General Statement of Policy and Procedure for Enforcement Actions (Enforcement Policy) as it was published in the *Federal Register* on May 1, 2000 (65 FR 25368). Because the policy is often revised without being reissued as a NUREG series publication, this current document is identified by date instead of revision number. The policy that preceded this April 2000 publication was NUREG-1600, November 9, 1999. The Enforcement Policy is a general statement of policy explaining the NRC's policies and procedures in initiating enforcement actions, and the responsibilities of the presiding officers and the Commission in reviewing these actions. This policy statement is applicable to enforcement matters involving the radiological health and safety of the public, including employees' health and safety, the common defense and security, and the environment. The NRC publishes the policy statement in NRC's NUREG series to foster its widespread dissemination. However, this is a policy statement and not a regulation. The Commission may deviate from this statement of policy and procedure as appropriate under the circumstances of a particular case.

As a living policy statement, revisions are noticed in the *Federal Register*. The NRC's Office of Enforcement maintains the current policy statement on its homepage on the Internet at www.nrc.gov/OE/. This revision (1) incorporates the Interim Enforcement Policy that was used during the NRC Power Reactor Oversight Process Pilot Plant Study into the main body of the Enforcement Policy as permanent guidance; (2) adds an interim Enforcement Policy for exercising enforcement discretion for inaccurate or incomplete performance indicator data for nuclear power plants; (3) changes examples of violations for operating reactors regarding changes, tests, and experiments; (4) adds examples of violations for inaccurate or incomplete performance indicator data; (5) changes examples of violations involving the failure to secure, or maintain surveillance over, licensed material; and (6) edits existing guidance to assure clarity of existing policy and consistency with the intent of the Interim Enforcement Policy. The intent of this Policy revision is to continue to move towards a more risk-informed and performance-based approach.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Ps fupe?

PP huvzax Lr
EET a _ ees

40160sz is MEG fom
JW CONDR ARDC AnpREYS are AD ess
Fy COMPA ATRAD LOS ANGELES A> cALIY SE)
WELAS FROM RDZCW 19> 3-108, ATTN CLI .SHCLN'WDT SACL: wpe
Ber sla pret eee Sa Sige en HE albany

oe . J

COMMENTS ON THIS Ad c. RE

3 AMENDMENT FROn ARDC. ‘Request PROVIBE US WITH
COMMENTS Ow Tax EFFECTS oF THIS“ REBBETIOW Te
me AVAILABILITY, .

‘1G/36092 RAR Roxzyy

WORE IHD PLS ACK REC THIS msc.
#### Zuehlke, Appellant, vs. Zuehlke, Respondent.

For the appellant: *A. J. Connors*of Barron and *W. T. Doar*of New Richmond. ■

For the respondent: /. *W. Soderberg*of Barron.

*By the Cou,rt.*

Judgment affirmed.
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
  



EXHIBIT 10.30.1  


 
 

CITY NATIONAL CORPORATION    
  


 
  FIRST AMENDMENT TO
  1999 VARIABLE BONUS PLAN    
  


    This First Amendment to the City National Corporation (the "Corporation") 1999 Variable Bonus Plan (the "Plan") is adopted as of March 5, 2001. 



    WHEREAS,
the Compensation and Directors Nominating Committee (the "Committee") and the Board of Directors have previously approved the 1999 Variable Bonus Plan; 


    WHEREAS,
the Corporation's 1999 Variable Bonus Plan was presented to the Corporation's stockholders, and approved by them, at the 1999 Annual Meeting of Stockholders; 


    WHEREAS,
it has been brought to the attention of the Committee that the Corporation's 1999 Variable Bonus Plan contains an error, in that it provides for bonus payments determined by
reference to a participant's "annualized base salary, as determined by the Committee, as of the first day of the Plan Year" when it was intended that bonus payments be determined by reference to a
participant's annualized base salary as of the last day of each Plan Year; 


    WHEREAS,
Section 9 of the Corporation's 1999 Variable Bonus Plan authorizes the Committee to correct any defect in the Plan; 


    WHEREAS,
Section 9 of Corporation's 1999 Variable Bonus Plan also authorizes the Board of Directors to modify the Plan in whole or in part, provided that no amendment may
violate the law or Treasury Regulation Section 1.162-27 (promulgated under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended) unless the Board of Directors finds that such amendment is
in the best interest of the Corporation; 


    WHEREAS,
the Committee believes the error in the Corporation's 1999 Variable Bonus Plan is a defect that the Committee is authorized to correct; 



    WHEREAS,
the Committee has been advised by its expert advisers that the amendment necessary to correct this defect would not violate the law or Treasury Regulation
Section 1.162-27; 


    NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that, retroactive to the initial adoption of this Corporation's 1999 Variable Bonus Plan, this Corporation's 1999 Variable Bonus Plan is corrected by
revising Section 5.4 thereof to read in its entirety as follows: 



	5.4
	The
award will be a bonus payment in an amount obtained by multiplying the following amounts: (1) a Participant's annualized base salary, as determined by the Committee, as
of the last day of the Plan Year, (2) a specified percentage (as expressed as a decimal or fixed by a formula which will determine such percentage) determined by the Committee to apply to the
Participant for the Plan Year. 



–1–













QuickLinks


CITY NATIONAL CORPORATION

FIRST AMENDMENT TO 1999 VARIABLE BONUS PLAN
**Exhibit 2.2**

 

Declaration 

byQIAGEN N.V., Venlo 

 

[Briefkopf QIAGEN N.V., Venlo] 

 

To 

 

Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft 

Königsallee 45 - 47 

 

40189 Düsseldorf 

 

acting as consortium leader consisting for the consortium consisting of 

Deutsche Bank AG Düsseldorf, 

Stadtsparkasse Düsseldorf und 

IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG, Düsseldorf 

- collectively called“consortium banks” -                                                                                                 Venlo, July 12, 2004 

 

Dear Sirs, 

 

Our subsidiary, QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden informed us that they are negotiating a credit contract with you at a value of euro 40.000.000,00 (in words: Forty million euro). Negotiating details of the contract are known tous. 

 

We hereby oblige ourselves, until full redemption of the loan that QIAGENGmbH receives based on those negotiations, not to dispose of in total or reduce our shareholding in the companies listed in the exhibit (status March 29, 2004) that is fixed to this letter without your prior written approval. In so far as we holdshares indirectly, we will take care that our subsidiaries will not dispose of in total or reduce their shareholdings. 

 

We are however allowed to transfer our shareholding to a company that is listed in the exhibit itself. 

 

Furthermore, the merger or de-merger of companies in the exhibit shall be allowed as long as we directly or indirectly remain being majorityshareholder in the succeeding company. The successor company shall be treated as a company of the exhibit. Expressively excluded thereof are QIAGEN GmbH, QIAGEN Sciences Inc., QIAGEN Inc. and QIAGEN North American Holdings Inc. We will continue tobe the direct respectively indirect shareholder as listed in the exhibit. 

 

Incase we do not comply with the aforementioned obligations we guarantee to the consortium banks that QIAGEN GmbH will fulfil its obligations under the credit contract. 

 

We confirm that the share of those group companies that are not listed in the exhibit in the consolidated revenues does not exceed 25% andthat the total EBITDA of said companies 

 

Seite 1(2) 

does not exceed 6% of the group EBITDA. We will inform you without delay in case that this would no longer be correct. In that case we will negotiate anamendment of the exhibit however in no case before December 31, 2004. 

 

We willgive you all information that is necessary to review the compliance with the obligations from this letter and the correctness of all statements herein. 

 

We assure you that we can give above declaration in accordance with the rights of the Netherlands for the company, and that all resolutions by the responsible committeesof the company, necessary for the assumption of these obligations are resolved. The right of the Federal Republic of Germany applies to this declaration. We agree upon Duesseldorf as place of jurisdiction. 

 

Yours sincerely 

 

 

QIAGEN N.V. 

 

Seite 2(2)
**Exhibit
      32.1**









**Certification
      Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Envirosafe Corporation (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bryan Kuskie,
      President, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








March
      22,
      2007





**ENVIROSAFE
      CORPORATION**











*/s/
      Bryan Kuskie*


Bryan
      Kuskie, President, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
**Conservation Practice Effects**

**Commonly Associated Practices:**Access Control , Access Road , , Critical Area Planting, Dam, Dam, Diversion, Dike, Diversion, Dust Control on Unpaved Roads and Surfaces, Filter Strip, Heavy Use Area Protection, Mulching, Recreation Area Improvement, Recreation Land Grading and Shaping, Riparian Forest Buffer, Riparian Herbaceous Cover, Upland Wildlife Habitat Management, Water and Sediment Control Basin, Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management.

**Note:**This worksheet contains general talking points for the conservation planner to discuss with the land user.  It is the first step towards an economic or financial analysis.  The second step would include identifying a specific site for analysis at the farm or field level, editing the template for local conditions, adding units and quantities of farm inputs and outputs.  The third step in the economic analysis is to place a dollar value on as many variables as possible, put all units in the same time frame, using amortization ($/Acres/Year) or net present value ($/Acre), so benefits and costs can be compared.  The fourth and final step would be to combine several conservation practices into a conservation system, which is how most conservation practices are applied at the field level. Data for the worksheet comes from the land user, conservation planner, technical specialist and local agricultural supply vendors and contractors.  See Economics Technical Note: TN 200-ECN-1, Basic Economic Analysis Using T-Charts (August 2013) for more information.
Exhibit 10.34


            THIRD AMENDMENT TO LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT AND SECOND
                               AMENDMENT TO NOTE


WHEREAS, Object Design, Inc. (the "Company") has entered into a certain Loan and
Security Agreement dated as of December 17, 1996 (as amended, the "Agreement")
with The First National Bank of Boston (now known as BankBoston, N.A.)( the
"Bank");

WHEREAS, the Company has requested, and the Bank has agreed pursuant to the
terms hereof, to extend the Revolving Credit Termination Date (as defined in the
Agreement) from September 30, 1998 to November 30, 1998. Capitalized terms used
herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth in the
Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Bank hereby agree as follows:


I.       Amendment to Agreement.

         The definition of: "Revolving Credit Termination Date" set forth in
Section 1.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as
follows:

             "Revolving Credit Termination Date. November 30, 1998."


II.      Amendment to Note.

         The Note is hereby amended by changing the date "September 30, 1998" in
the first and last sentences of the first paragraph thereof to "November 30,
1998".


III.     Miscellaneous.

         1. Other than as amended hereby, all terms and provisions of the
         Agreement, the Note, and related documents are ratified and affirmed as
         of the date hereof.

         2. The Company represents and warrants to the Bank that, after giving
         affect to this Amendment, no Default exists under the Agreement or
         related documents.
<PAGE>



Upon receipt of a fully executed copy of this Amendment by the Bank, this
Amendment shall be deemed to be an instrument executed under seal to be governed
by the laws of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts effective as of the date
hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment by
     their duly authorized officers as of November 4, 1998.



BANKBOSTON, N.A.
(formerly known as "THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF BOSTON")

         By: /s/ David Crane

         Its:  Director


OBJECT DESIGN, INC.

         By: /s/ Lacey Brandt

         Its:  Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.1

ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda) LTD.

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned, Shih-Jye Cheng, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES (Bermuda)
LTD. (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Report.

The foregoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 solely for purposes
of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

Date: April 26, 2013



/s/ Shih-Jye
ChengName:

Shih-Jye ChengTitle:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer