alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
INTERCREDITOR
      AGREEMENT

     

    This
      Agreement (this “Agreement”),
      dated
      as of September 16, 2008, is made by Karat Platinum, Inc, a Nevada corporation
      (“Karat”),
      in
      favor of Septimus Ventures LLC, a New York limited liability company (the
“New
      Secured Creditor”)

     

    Whereas,
      Karat Platinum, Inc. (formerly known as Sentra Consulting Corp.), a Nevada
      corporation (“Sentra”)
      is a
      party to the Intercreditor Agreement (the “Intercreditor
      Agreement”),
      dated
      as of January 30, 2008, by and among Karat, Sentra and Continental, as amended
      as of March 3, 2008 among the signatories thereto (capitalized terms used and
      not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the
      Intercreditor Agreement).

     

    WHEREAS,
      subsequent to the execution and delivery of the Intercreditor Agreement, the
      New
      Secured Creditor has loaned funds to Karat as evidenced by Karat’s Secured
      Promissory Note, dated the date hereof in favor of the New Secured Creditor
      in
      the principal amount of $500,000 (the “New
      Secured Note”);
      and

     

    WHEREAS,
      Karat desire to add the New Secured Creditor as a party to the Intercrediotor
      Agreement, and memorialize the agreements between Karat and the New Secured
      Creditor with respect to the enforcement of its rights pertaining to its
      promissory note and the security interest in the Inventory.

     

    NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the forgoing and the mutual promises,
      representations, warranties and covenants hereinafter set forth and for other
      good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
      acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

     

    The
      New
      Secured Creditor shall, as of the date hereof, become a party to the
      Intercreditor Agreement and the related Security Agreement, and for all purposes
      after the date hereof be entitled to the benefits of the creditors and secured
      parties therein.

     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first
      above written.

     

    KARAT
      PLATINUM, INC.

     

     

    By:
      /s/
      David Neuberg  

    Name:
      David Neuberg    

    Title:
      Chief Executive Officer   

    


    


    SEPTIMUS
      VENTURES LLC

    


    


    By:
      /s/
      Bonnie Septimus 

    Name:
      Bonnie Septimus
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC StaffFinal Environmental Impact Statement for the Construction and Operation of an Independent Spent Fuel

# Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Construction and Operation of an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation on the Reservation of the Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians and the Related Transportation Facility in Tooele County, Utah (NUREG-1714, Volume 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download document
        - NUREG-1714, Volume 1 (PDF - 31.1 MB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**December 2001

Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and SafeguardsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

U.S. Bureau of Indian AffairsU.S. Bureau of Land ManagementU.S. Surface Transportation Board

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Private Fuel Storage, L.L.C. (PFS), proposes to construct and operate an independent spent fuel storage installation on the Reservation of the Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians. The Reservation is located geographically within Tooele County, Utah. Spent nuclear fuel (SNF) would be transported by rail from existing U.S. commercial reactor sites to Skull Valley. To transport the SNF from the existing rail line to the proposed facility, PFS proposed to construct and operate a rail siding and a 51 m (32 mile) rail line from the rail line near Low, Utah to the reservation.

This final environmental impact statement evaluates the potential environmental impacts of the PFS proposal. The document discusses the purpose and need for the PFS proposed facility, describes the proposed action and its reasonable alternatives, describes the environment potentially affected by the proposal, presents and compares the potential environmental impacts resulting from the proposed action and its alternatives, and identifies mitigation measures that could eliminate or lessen the potential environmental impacts.

The PFS proposal requires approval from four federal agencies: the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the U.S. Department of Interior's Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Land Management, and the U.S. Surface Transportation Board. The actions required of these agencies are administrative. The environmental issues that each of these agencies must evaluate pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) are interrelated; therefore; the agencies have cooperated in the preparation of this final environmental impact statement, and this document serves to satisfy each agency's statutory responsibilities under NEPA.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Filed by sedaredgar.com - Arise Technologies Inc. - Exhibit 10.7






Statement 

 

This statement is made regarding the loan between the following
parties: 

	 	(1) 	
      Shih Liang (the “Lender”); and

	 	(2) 	
      Arise Technologies Co., Ltd. (the
  “Borrower”).



The content of the loan is as following: 

	 	1. 	
      Loan. The Lender lend the Borrower the sum of USD$103,694
      by the end of June 30, 2008.

	 	 	 
	 	2. 	
      Interest. Both parties have agreed that the loan shall
      not bear interest.

	 	 	 
	 	3. 	
      Payment. Payment shall be discussed between both parties
      in accordance with the operation of the company.

	 	 	 
	 	4. 	
      Governing Law. This statement shall be governed by,
      construe and enforced in accordance with the laws of
  Taiwan.



 

 

Signed by the Borrower: Arise Technologies Co., Ltd. 


Signed by the Lender: /s/ Shih Liang
SAFSS

SAASAFSS P

287 • 1953 MAY 6 09 36

DE AFSP 238

P 041739Z

FM SAFSP

TO SAFSS

BT

UNCLAS E F T 0 SAFSP NINE/4 •5 •29. FOR COL J L MARTIN, SAFSS.

OF AFSPPL AND LMS ROGRAM). IT WAS ORIGINALLY

THIS OFFICE HAS A F VALID REQUIREMENT FOR FILM SUPPORT

ANTICIPATED TO PRFILM THRU LMSC. HOWEVER, SUBSTANTIAL

SAVINGS WOULD RESULT IN THE PROCUREMENT BEING MADE DIRECT BY

SAFSP; THEREFORE, A DECISION WAS MADE TO ISSUE A CALL CONTRACT

WITH EXC. THE ONLY PROCUREMENT DATA . AVAILABLE IS FILM SIZE., e.:.

LENGTH AND EXC EMULSION NUMBERS. IN VIEW OF THIS, THE PROCUREMENT •:*

ORIGINALLY FOR. APRIL DELIVERY TO AFSPPL IN THE AMOUNT OF'

IN QUESTION IS SOLE SOURCE TO EKC.-THE FIRST REQUIREMENT WAS . 1

ROLLS. THE REQUIREMENT IS URGENT AND TO DATE HAS NOT BEE

SINCE CONTRACT APPROVAL IS STILL CONTINGENT UPON THE WAIVER TO

ASPR CLAUSES WHICH WILL BE COVERED LATER. THE FILM WAS ORDERED

VERBALLY APPROXIMATELY THREE WEEKS AGO IN ORDER TO TAKE ADVANTAGE

OF EASTMAN'S PRODUCTION RUN WHICH PREVENTED A 60 DAY DELAY IN

SCHEDULE. THE APRIL REQUIREMENT IS CURRENTLY SITTING ON THE

DOCKS AT EKC.

THE PROBLEM WITH RESPECT TO NONAPPROVAL OF THE CONTRACT IS A

RESULT OF THREE CLAUSES OF ASPR (7-104.29, 7 • 104.41 AND 7-104.42),

AND A CONTRACTOR'S PRICING CERTIFICATE (ASPR 3-307.4), :4

WHICH THE SSD PROCURETTNT COMMITTEE STATES MUST BE INSERTED • i

IN THE CONTRACT. EASTMAN WILL NOT AGREE TO THE ABOVE CLAUSES ON ti

THE BASIS THAT ALL FILM DEVELOPMENT HAS BEEN COMPANY SPONSORED

AND THAT THE PRICES QUOTED ARE CATALOGUE PRICES FOR ITEMS WHICH . f

ARE AVAILABLE FOR SALE TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC IN ANY QUANTITY t • REQUIRED. THE CONTRACTOR HAS CERTIFIED THAT THE PRICES AGREED

TO QUOTE ARE NOT IN EXCESS OF TRANSFEROR'S SALES PRICES TO ITS nF.

MOST FAVORED CUSTOMER FOR THE SAME ITEM IN LIKE QUANTITY, OR

THE CURRENT MARKET PRICE WHICHEVER IS LOVER UNQUOTE. THE •

CONTRACTING OFFICER IS THUS FACED WITH AN URGENT REQUIREMENT

•

WHICH CAN BE MET BY ONLY ONE SOURCE (EASTMAN); AN SSD INTERPRETATION THAT THE ABOVE REFERENCED ASPR CLAUSES ARE MANDATORY'

AND THE CONTRACTOR'S ADAMENT REFUSAL TO ACCEPT THE CONTRACT WITH

THOSE CLAUSES. IN ORDER TO RESOLVE THE IMPASSE AND INSURE THAT A :.. 

P

NUMBER OF HIGH PRIORITY PROGRAMS ARE NOT JEOPARDIZED, IT IS •

REQUESTED THAT A SE • WAIVER BE GRANTED AUTHORIZING THE

.

ISSUANCE OF CONTRACT 41 TO EASTMAN KODAK CO. WITHOUT . -

THE CLAUSES SET FORT •104.29, 7-104.41 AND•7•104.42

AND FURTHER WAIVING THE REQUIREMENT OF THE PRICING CERTIFICATE

CASPR 3-307.4). THE URGENCY OF THE REQUIREMENT PRECLUDES THE

POSSIBILITY OF RESOLVING THE PROBLEM BY ANY OTHER MEANS. YOUR

PROMPT SUPPORT IN THIS MATTER WILL BE APPRECIATED.

BT •

04/1755Z MAY AFSP

Control • If
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,945
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  732,638
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,808
<INVENTORY>                                  1,998,686
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,937,479
<PP&E>                                       2,292,717
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,073,510
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,575,697
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,306,099
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,386
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,765,399
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,575,697
<SALES>                                      1,220,223
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,220,223
<CGS>                                          484,872
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  484,872
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               804,129
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,352
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,459)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (47,459)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (47,459)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

CNET Networks, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (Nos. 333-127785, 333-19997, 333-19962, 333-15569, 333-105563, 333-90739, 333-85374, 333-65224, 333-58724, 333-35458, 333-78247, 333-67325, 333-34491, 333-07671, 333-07667) on Forms S-8 and S-3 of CNET Networks, Inc. of ourreport dated February 28, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of CNET Networks, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income(loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, and the related financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of CNET Networks, Inc. 

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for stock-based compensation upon adoption of FinancialAccounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment”. 

KPMG LLP 

San Francisco, California 

February 28, 2007
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 126 

To provide a permanent deduction for State and local general sales taxes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 8, 2015 

Mr. HELLER (for himself, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. ENZI, Mr. THUNE, Mr. CORNYN, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. NELSON, and Mr. ALEXANDER) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide a permanent deduction for State and local general 

sales taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION FOR 

4 STATE AND LOCAL GENERAL SALES TAXES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (I) of section 

6 164(b)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as 

7 amended by section 105 of the Tax Increase Prevention 

8 Act of 2014, is amended by striking ‘‘, and before January 

9 1, 2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 126 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2014. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
---

EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Braintech, Inc. (the
"Company ") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Edward A. White, the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





/s/ Edward A. WhiteEdward
A. White Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer March 22,
2007

---
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration
 AGENCY: Economic Development Administration, Department of Commerce.
 ACTION: Notice and opportunity for public comment. Pursuant to Section 251 of the Trade Act 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2341 
                    *et seq.*), the Economic Development Administration (EDA) has received petitions for certification of eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance from the firms listed below. Accordingly, EDA has initiated investigations to determine whether increased imports into the United States of articles like or directly competitive with those produced by each of these firms contributed importantly to the total or partial separation of the firm's workers, or threat thereof, and to a decrease in sales or production of each petitioning firm. List of Petitions Received by Eda for Certification Eligibility To Apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance
[1/21/2015 through 2/11/2015]
Firm name
Firm address
Date accepted for investigation
Product(s)Detroit Tool & Engineering, Inc
1107 Springer Road, Lebanon, MO 65536
2/6/2015
The firm manufactures customized fabricated metal products including HVAC, appliances, heavy truck, machine bases, fixtures, electrical panels and rotating safety clampsMaster Hatters of Texas, Inc
2945 Market Street, Garland, TX 75041
2/11/2015
The firm manufactures hats
 Any party having a substantial interest in these proceedings may request a public hearing on the matter. A written request for a hearing must be submitted to the Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms Division, Room 71030, Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no 
                    ( print page 8591)
                    later than ten (10) calendar days following publication of this notice. Please follow the requirements set forth in EDA's regulations at 13 CFR 315.9 for procedures to request a public hearing. The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance official number and title for the program under which these petitions are submitted is 11.313, Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms. Dated: February 11, 2015. Michael S. DeVillo, Eligibility Examiner.


[FR Doc. 2015-03258 Filed 2-17-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-WH-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the Unaudited Statements of Operations and Accumulated
Deficit for the Six Months Ended June 30, 1999 and the
Unaudited Balance Sheet at June 30, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         139,847
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  487,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    144,232
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               774,364
<PP&E>                                         339,765
<DEPRECIATION>                                 332,973
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 792,156
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,698
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,000
<COMMON>                                       122,824
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   792,156
<SALES>                                        609,224
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               612,434
<CGS>                                          377,296
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  552,553
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,749
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,265
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,867
<INCOME-TAX>                                    39,367
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             39,367
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    39,367
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
#### Porter *v.*McClure.

The wife of a person inierested in the event of (lie question, but not of the cause, is admissible as a witness.

The Defendant offered *Mrs Greenwood*to prove that *Hagar,*the wench in question, was a sound and sensible negro. The point in controversy was, whether she was so or not, when *McClure*sold her to *Porter*and warranted her to be so. The husband of this witness had purchased the same negro of *Porter*and since sold her. It was objected that *Mrs. Greenwood*was incompetent, being interested in the event of the question *•*for if the negro was really an ideot, then the* vendee of *Greenwood*may resort to him for selling an unsound negro. She is interested in maintaining the negro to have been a sensible one.

*414
      *Per curiam*

The true, rule is, if the verdict in this cause may be given in evidence in another cause for or against the witness, then her testimony should not be received, otherwise it may. Now the verdict in this cause to which *Greenwood*is no party, cannot possibly ever come to be given in e\id* nee. for or against him, in any other cause, to which be shall be a party, and therefore, sheisclearlyacompete.nl witness. Formerly there were some doubts, whether a witness interested in rhequestion could be received, and for some time, the decisions .were both ways ; but it is lately settled in our courts, that no interest but that in the event, of the cause, shall render a witness incompetent. She was sworn and gave evidence.

*Note.*— Vide *Farrell*v. *Perry,*and the references in the note upon this subject, *ante*2,