alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                               HINES HORTICULTURE

                            CERTIFCATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hines Horticulture, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
A. Ferguson, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


                                             By:   /s/ Robert A. Ferguson
                                                   ----------------------
                                                   Robert A. Ferguson
                                                   CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
                                                   (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)


May 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Hines Horticulture, Inc. and will be retained by Hines Horticulture,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Siewert, Respondent, vs. City of Milwaukee, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Max Raskin,*city attorney, and *Joseph L. Bednarek,*assistant city attorney, both of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Churchill, Bennett, Churchill & Davis*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<CIK>                    0000350194
<NAME>                   United Systems Technology, Inc.
       
<S>                      <C>               <C>          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS          3-MOS       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>        DEC-31-1998    DEC-31-1997   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>             MAR-31-1998    MAR-31-1997   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                        237748              0        204807
<SECURITIES>                       0              0             0
<RECEIVABLES>                 113774              0        216693  
<ALLOWANCES>                       0              0             0
<INVENTORY>                        0              0             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              361156              0        427665
<PP&E>                         74754              0         85940
<DEPRECIATION>                 36771          39782        159579  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                956406              0       1053265   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        1128168              0       1210749
<BONDS>                        50000              0         50000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0              0             0
<PREFERRED>                   130000              0        130000
<COMMON>                     4317803              0       4317803
<OTHER-SE>                         0              0             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  956406              0       1053265
<SALES>                        47584          78503             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              367579         458479             0
<CGS>                          18810          33072             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 382534         463997             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                (608)           900             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0              0             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1170           1393             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    0              0             0
<INCOME-TAX>                       0              0             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                0              0             0
<DISCONTINUED>                     0              0             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0              0             0
<CHANGES>                          0              0             0
<NET-INCOME>                  (14347)         (6418)            0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      0              0             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0              0             0
                

</TABLE>
Prepared by: 

Jit.1\131Y / S. OROS 

Approved by: 

W 5, 

19 ••!: !!!r•Oli.H.,T101- 4 AFEET 

ENE; ft E:Er- THE LINITV) 

v;i:!:1•1 OE "F-iE ESPIONAGE 

U ft TftT 79 /..;-40 794, ITS 

5RA14'31,11t,S^.■ '; c. Or ITS CON9/ UN:1;It T,1> EmATEHoKEZEb 

PliEts0E-E 

ITEXCLUDE D TOM ,11_11t1MATIt. 

RIEDRAEO NG: 000 [999 5200 1C 

DOES NOT 6.PEEL 

.. • E.-", 

HNIC DELY:,..;cipTimN 

sTo PITH 

RECONUISSANCE SYST .M 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 AUGUST 2015 

REPORT MO zici; 

DATE: 

1 

Vtd:E 00'r 
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 AUGUST 2015 
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 AUGUST 2015 

• 
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 AUGUST 2015 

A %,A1 I F;/1 .

• 

• 

• 3, of aDoo 

1nbi2, ,,'1;41 maXim41 rcpom5,1'7. 

vr,vyiop', fron .nit,Lziun of isotropic to a lionivt'd 

ttlxcl 

C f -1,11 vvhi:Ac- 
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 AUGUST 2015 

• 

• •••c1.d. 'Le; 

'LA 
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 AUGUST 2015 

1I16f, 

tO.flh!, p7az.e arf:, 
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 AUGUST 2015 

/1 V' IF. 4

4 2e' 9.Lt . 
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 AUGUST 2015 

/4) ■4 E).4 

• 

. 

. ( 

160 

:Vw. 

27.;1,v.: o,o-te:v 

Men the: 01.1.4u-; 

n pi :) 

L,Iput (rce.:.,acd) l'setwIF:en V iz 

1.11f:ntyvd, the car7e doe3 not Mao 

tho 1.,y mere thw:. ± V at 

1-wi:T.TztodLate, 

Aceer:p.4'3hed fmquery 

ex;eillatur te AC Inr.l.tor 

inverter-I, J.L1 driv'e a 00 

rps motor:. 

r."r 

- :; 
S 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 AUGUST 2015 

8-i 

o.f 

, :t-,7;t34:-0111,„ OT ;Mai 
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 AUGUST 2015 

7/•• 

• AO 

• ' : ; 
9 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 AUGUST 2015 

At) i8.4- 
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 AUGUST 2015 

• 

Reset • 

Data 

Out 

Reset 

In 

Data 

. Out 
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 AUGUST 2015
# C_2005106EN.01001302.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/13

---

Application brought on 11 March 2005 by Maria Fernanda Gil do Nascimento and Others for authorisation to serve a garnishee order on the Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-5/05 SA)

(2005/C 106/26)

Language of the case: Portuguese

An application for authorisation to serve a garnishee order on the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 11 March 2005 by Maria Fernanda Gil do Nascimento and Others, represented by João Carlos Grilo Simões, lawyer.

The applicants claim that the Court should lift the immunity enjoyed by the Commission and authorise the attachment of the funds of ISD — Informações, Sistemas e Desenvolvimentos SA held by the Commission of the European Communities and intended for the judgment creditors for the payment of wages and salaries and debts owed in respect thereof.

---
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-3369

LT Case No. 2017-CF-4308

_____________________________

NATHANIEL STEPHENSON,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, a Case of Original 

Jurisdiction.

Nathaniel Stephenson, Raiford, pro se. 

No Appearance for Respondent. 

December 21, 2023

PER CURIAM.

This Court previously affirmed Petitioner’s direct appeal and 

thereafter, dismissed several petitions and appeals filed in this 

Court stemming from Marion County Circuit Court Case No. 2017-

CF-4308. Because it appears that Petitioner’s filings are abusive,

repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Petitioner is cautioned that any 

further pro se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from 

the identified case number may result in sanctions such as a bar 

on pro se filings in this Court and referral to prison officials for 
2

disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain 

time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2023); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 

2d 47 (Fla. 1999). Moreover, the Petition for Writ of Habeas 

Corpus, filed November 16, 2023, is dismissed. See Richardson v. 

State, 918 So. 2d 999, 1002–03 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

PETITIONER WARNED; PETITION DISMISSED.

JAY, HARRIS, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
4 •

Ss y E

Mr. Roy W. Johnson

Director, Advanced Research Projects Agoaey

Department of Defense

Washington 25, D. C.

Dear Mr. Johnson:

Recent information which I have received about the Argon

Project compels me to urge you to review at the earliest possible

date the satellite napping program to determine whether the present

objectives are adequate to inset urgent military requiremeats and

whether the technical approach is capable et achieving these objectives.

Broadly speaking,' Argon embraces a program of accurately

mapping the world through the establishment of a new controlled grid

of the earth's surface. As you know. however. the Air Force is faced

with the problem of linking the Soviet target complex to known geodetic

control points for our ballistic missile systems. In order to make

both the halo( and ICBM fully operational weapon systems, these data

are needed now. It is important that Argon be conducted in a way

which will meet these specific missile targeting objectives. I believe

that the SAMOS mapping sub-system (1B-4) offers a solution to the

sasissile targeting problem and would be a desirable adjunct to the

Argon Project.

There are two additional factors which bear as this program.

The first is security control. The fact that Argon will introduce four

new firings in the Discoverer series while at the same time the four

known SAMOS flights are now cancelled complicates the cover plan for

the sensitive phases of Discoverer. The second factor is the possible

interference with the proposed Corona shots that are due to be launched

in 1960. The data from the Corona series is vital to the MIN! and

ICBM targeting problem. Any adverse effect on the Corona program

should be avoided.

An early massive deterrent capability will be possible only if

an adequate satellite mapping program is able to meet our time-wise

EYES ONLY

•

ItYtieraber 1959
4 •

EYES ONLY

and technical regeirements for bs111r1ic missiles. I would like to

recommend, therefore, that • small group be assembled by you to

review the Argon Project and to ceasider reinstatemeat cut the Z-4

Program. I have discussed this MUM? with Dr. Charyk. Beth he

and I would be available on Wednesday. 9 September, at 1100 hour..

In addition, I would like to suggest Dr. Bruce Billings be invited to

attend. I will make available an AltDC technical team to brief you

on the Z-4 program and to outline how it can be used to assist in

accomplishing Argon objectives as well as provide the data essential

to the urgent requirements of the ballistic missile operational program.

Sincerely,

31. A. SCKILIZVICR

Lieutenant General, USAF

Commander

CC'

Dr. Bruce Billings

Mr. Bissell

EYES ONLY

TOI9ECV
FAYETTEVILLE,

OCTOBER TERM, 1796.

#### Wilcox *v.*Ray.

A copy of a record should be *verbatim,*and not be certified by the clerk that such things appeared to him from the record The loss of a record must be proved fay the oath of some person, and not by the certificate of the clerk.

Ejectment. The Plaintiff stated his title to be derived under *Simpson*(he patentee, against, whom the State recovered a judgment, upon which execution issued, and the land in question was sold lo him to satisfy it, on the 25th November, 1768. He produced the patent to *Simpson,*and offered what he called a copy of the record of the judgment and execution. It was a certificate of the clerk setting forth that it appeared to him from the docket, that a judgment had been entered for so mhch, and that, an ex-*473edition had issued, and that the rest of (he record what appeared upon the docket, was lust. *Mr. Moore*objected, that as to that part of the record which was lost, if it were a fact, it should be proven by some person on oath ; the clerk not being appointed by law to certify the loss of a record, his certificate upon the subject was of no consequence, and as to those part-, of the record which he had certified, they could not be received — for .he had only given a history of Use record as it appeared to him, whereas the very words should be copied, that the court might judge of the true import of it. The clerk may mistake the. meaning of the entries, and draw improper conclusions from them. And of that opinion a as the court, and refused to receive the certificate, and the Plaintiff was nonsuited.

*Note.*— Vide *State*v. *Norman,*2 *Dev. Rep.*222.
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 DOCUMENT CONTROL LOG 

Control Number 9300-PN-1 427 O9300-PN-13425 Cy 

Copy Number(s) 9300-PN-13433 Cy 

NAME OF COURIER: 

8/21/67 

SOURCE: 

ITEK 

- . 

ADDRESSEE: 

DESCRIPTION, DATE, SUBJECT, CY NUMBER, NUMBER OF PAGES, ANY OTTER TDENTIFYTNG 

NUMBERS: 

Photographs, 21, Aug 67, 9300-PN-13427 Cy 2 1 page - MOCK-UP OF ACQUISITION 

'OPTICS TETESCOPE FROM EYEPIECE END WITH CONVEES 

REMOVED TO SHOW ARRANGEMENT OF OPTICAL ELEMENTS - 

'AL1LtSt. 

HIGH POWER MODE 4-44.i 

' 00-PN

--- 

..- i-25 Cy 2; I page, WOOD AND PLATIC MOCK-UP OF ACQUISITION OPTICS SUBSY' 

-1343 Cy 2; 1 page, WOOD AND PLASTIC MOCK-UP OF ACQUISITION OPTICS 

SUBSYSTEM TELESCOPE; 1.page 

REMARKS: 

. . 

RECTEPT SIGNATURE DATE INVENTORY DATE DISPOSITION 

. 

_ . _ 8 2V6T 

.., . 

:,..., t ' T., 5 • ---61 ' 

---1 

,....... 

2 

0 

4-1 0 

çL 

O "J 

Ill CC 

O 0 

4 

1.) C.) 

• G 

ID, 0 

c..■ 

•■-4 U 

-Lt 4-4 •r-t 

4-+ 

- 

w 

0 0 

• 

W 

- 

00 

C.) 4-1 

O P. 0+ 

a) tZ 

G 

O 0 

O $-1 0 

P

;2: +4-I 

hotoNumber
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,860
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,245
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         347,853
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,935
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 325,515
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        174,101
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     137,088
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   325,515
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,765
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,737
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,285<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,282
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,584
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,584
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (831)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,753
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .94
<FN>
<F1>Depreciation and Amortization
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,509-03

EX PARTE JAIME COVARRUBIAS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W99-32080-V(C) IN THE 292ND DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and

the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. Under Article

11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, a district clerk is required to forward to this Court,

among other things, “the application, any answers filed, any motions filed, transcripts of all

depositions and hearings, any affidavits, and any other matters such as official records used by the

court in resolving issues of fact.” Id. at § 3(d); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). The record

forwarded to this Court appears, however, to be incomplete. Volume 4 of the reporter’s record from

Applicant’s trial, to which the trial court cites in its findings of fact and conclusions of law, is not

in the habeas record and is missing from the appellate record in the court of appeals.
2

The district clerk shall either forward to this Court volume 4 of the reporter’s record from

Applicant’s 2000 trial or certify in writing that this document is not part of the record. The district

clerk shall comply with this order within thirty days from the date of this order.

Filed: June 7, 2022

Do not publish
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

OMAN SYSTEM OM 

1111111111111111111 111111111111 

AIR FORCE MOL POLICY COMMITTEE 

Highlight Summary 

of 

Agenda Items for Meeting 66-2, April 29, 1966 

1. Old Business: The previous meeting was devoted to a summary of 

the presentation given to the Reconnaissance Panel of PSAC on 

February 9, 1966. 

2. Status Report of MOL Cost and Schedule Problems: On April 8, 

1966 the Director, MOL advised the Secretary of the Air Force that 

an adjustment to the MOL-flight schedule appeared to be a necessary 

course of action. Major factors in the new schedule were cited as 

follows: 

a. An April 1970 date for the first manned flight is governed 

by the availability of flight-quality optics. 

b. Elimination of a manned flight to man rate the Gemini B and 

laboratory vehicle prior to the all-up systems flight test in April 

1970 is forced by FY 1967 and FY 1968 considerations. 

c. Change to three-month centers for subsequent flights is in 

the interest of reducing total program costs. 

Rough order of magnitude costs on major segments of the program, 

based on the previous schedule, have since been reviewed in detail 

by an in-house task force. These costs and alternative schedules 

were presented to the Director, MOL and a Senior Review Board on 

April 26, 1966. 

The status report to the MOL Policy Committee 

options, including cost and schedule trade-offs. 

During May 1966, contractors will submit firm 

Phase II on major system segments. At that time, 

Committee will be asked to approve costs prior to 

Department of Defense. 

will cover program 

cost proposals for 

the MOL Policy 

submission to the 

Committee Action Requested: Comments. 

DORIAN 

NANPL VIA BYEMAN SYSTEM (.1Nt.Y 

- Page 1 of 2 pages 

Copy 1 of 10 copies 

SAF-SL BYE 21117-66 

EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING; 

DOD DiR 5200.10 DOES NOT APPLY 

-SEW11 
c)2-...et ( ot-t-,-e- Let / / 

) s A**4Ciltlfe1441-f. 

A) e 7 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 -SECREF RIII VIA BYEMAN SYSTEM ONLY 

3. Review of MOL Priority: A discussion will be presented for information on the need for upgrading MOL priorities to BRICK-BAT .01/DX 

status, and the procedure selected to nominate MOL for these priorities. 

Committee Action Requested: None. 

4. Report on Items of Interest: A brief report will be given on 

certain efforts related to the MOL Program, including: 

a. The current study of a wholly unmanned system which will meet 

the MOL performance requirements. \-16, ),E4 Sre 

Dfil 1"-c-0111-efrkaA 

b. The study of NASA's potential use of Gemini B/M0 /Titan III 

hardware or the substitution of Titan III for Saturn IB to meet the 

objectives of the Apollo Applications Program (AAP). 

Committee Action Requested: None. 

5 r eif9 e s1 

6, ,tess dota . 

Ae: t 

, PA 

pat"' 

DORIAN 

Page 2 of 2 pages 

Copy 1 of 10 copies 

SAF-SL BYE 21117-66 

HANDLE VIA BYEMAN SYSTEM ONLY
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R E HEARING

Appellate case name: In re Carolyn Frost Keenan

Appellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00581

- CV

Trial court case number: 2014

- 03190

Trial court: 133rd District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: 7/27/15

Party filing motion: Relator

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: /s/

______ Rebeca Huddle_________________________________________

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Huddle

.

Date: August 27, 2015
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 21, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40369

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE LUIS DELGADO-ELIZONDO

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:94-CR-162-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis DelgadoElizondo (Delgado) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Delgado has not filed

a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses

no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
No. 05-40369

2

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*January 7, 1930.*

#### Friedman Manufacturing Company, Respondent, vs. C. J. Kremer, as Dairy and Food Commissioner, Appellant.

For the appellant: *John W. Reynolds,*attorney general, and *Suel O. Arnold,*assistant attorney general.

For the respondent: *Richmond, Jackman, Wilkie & Toebaas*of Madison.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.