alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HAl,lj,l [ Vl-'I Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114874 

h:if ,;'J;l:;:.!!:iL,,2 f) ,1 r:.-- 1: ,, ·\.; :.:i i il,,/;J ,-;J J COl-;HIOL !>Y5TU4 

~NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. lllllllllllllllll!l~~JU.11~1111111111111111 

TH[ NRO STAFF 

MEMORANDUM FOR GENERAL BERG 

SUBJECT: Launching History 

June 2, 1969 

The attached listings show military, civilian, and NRP launchings 

from the Western and Eastern Test Ranges. 

The numbers appearing under each heading represent "successful" 

launchings; a successful launching is defined as a payload injected into 

orb.it. Furthermore, we have defined 417 launchings as military --

not NRP -- throughout the 417 program, 

Colonel, USAF 

Assistant to the Director 

··•c.Lu::.ico f'j:~o"' Al)T011u.nc IH'-l'l:AIW,i'.. 

DOLi OHll,C.[:•JII $100 Ii) ::.>OL';, •;O! AP;>~'r 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114874 
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114874 

Ten ii ;;"'CRr-1 'ltJlil.. 1, i,l,.. 

CONHl:OL SVSTCM 

WESTERN TEST 

SPACE LAUNCHINGS 

Military Civilian NRP 

1958 0 0 D 

1959 0 0 6 

1960 0 0 7 

1961 2 0 14 

1962 4 1 29 

196 3 7 1 19 

1964 5 5 28 

1965 10 3 23 

1966 15 3 25 

1967 8 6 20 

1968 5 7 18 

1969 2 3 6 

TOP SECR[l EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC RLGRADING 

52V/J 10 !JOl!> NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114874 
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114874 ~·1:r1 SEE'rnr· ~ . ' ~'i. ! 

>H,l'<Ol f ,;p, 

r,'),r r;-:1 ~ r. :\l '.!J ~ LL.~\i 

c.o,w-1r;t "S-r,rr"' 

EASTERN TEST RANGE 

SPACE LAUNCHINGS 

Military Civilian NRP 

1958 5 2 0 

1959 0 5 0 

1960 4 5 0 

1961 3 8 0 

1962 1 17 0 

1963 1 7 0 

1964 1 12 0 

1965 5 17 0 

1966 2 24 0 

1967 3 18 0 

1968 2 11 1 

1969 2 7 1 

-".:. )tr, l·l.~ \I IA 

L1!Ei·,:r~:\: oo.r•o, •o wr >-~If I 0 o/ C.OJIY \ Ol' ___ c~l"k!t 

000 Otll:H1n,t ~l'OO 10 oon NOT J.Pt'LY 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114874
#### Jeffrey Valenti et al., Respondents, v New York City Transit Authority, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, and R.A. Gottlieb, Respondent. Sheldon Electric, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[772 NYS2d 568]

*474In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant third-party plaintiff New York City Transit Authority appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.), dated December 18, 2002, as, upon reargument, (1) vacated stated portions of a prior order of the same court dated May 9, 2002, and (2) denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment on its claim for contractual indemnification against the defendant third-party defendant fourth-party plaintiff R.A. Gottlieb, Inc.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court, upon reargument, properly denied that branch of the motion of the defendant third-party plaintiff, New York City Transit Authority (hereinafter the Transit Authority), which was for summary judgment on its claim for contractual indemnification against the defendant third-party defendant fourth-party plaintiff, R.A. Gottlieb, Inc. (hereinafter Gottlieb). In opposition to the Transit Authority’s prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, Gottlieb raised a triable issue of fact as to the extent of supervision and control exercised by the Transit Authority over the work being performed which resulted in the plaintiff Jeffrey Valenti’s injuries *(see Belcastro v Hewlett-Woodmere Union Free School Dist. No. 14, 286*AD2d 744, 746-747 [2001]; *Kennelty v Darlind Constr.,*260 AD2d 443, 446 [1999]). In particular, there is an issue of fact with respect to the Transit Authority’s negligence, inter alia, in affording access to the room in which the subject accident occurred.

The Transit Authority’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                 DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                         6,413,062
<SECURITIES>                                                   6,096,449
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              12,625,068
<PP&E>                                                           480,756
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                14,469,030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          1,424,790
<BONDS>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                          77,204
<OTHER-SE>                                                    12,931,379
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  14,469,030
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 256,883
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  1,521,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               367,448
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (1,632,102)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (1,632,102)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (1,632,102)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     (0.35)



</TABLE>
# C_2005057EN.01003902.xml

| 5.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/39

---

Action brought on 11 January 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against Parthenon A.E.

(Case T-7/05)

(2005/C 57/66)

Language of the Case: Greek

An action against Parthenon – Anonimos Etairia Ikodomikon – Touristikon – Viomikhanikon – Emporikon kai Exagogikon Ergasion was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 11 January 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Dimitrios Triantafillou, Legal Adviser, assisted by Nikolaos Korogiannakis, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1. | order the defendant to pay the sum of EUR 325 452,80, which corresponds to EUR 259 800 by way of principal sum and EUR 65 652,80 in default interest up to 10 January 2005; |
| --- | --- |

1.

order the defendant to pay the sum of EUR 325 452,80, which corresponds to EUR 259 800 by way of principal sum and EUR 65 652,80 in default interest up to 10 January 2005;

| 2. | order the defendant to pay in addition interest of EUR 71,18 per day until the debt has been settled in full; |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the defendant to pay in addition interest of EUR 71,18 per day until the debt has been settled in full;

| 3. | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The European Community, represented by the European Commission, concluded with the defendant, as coordinator and member of a joint venture, a contract that formed part of implementation of the provisions of the specific programme of ‘research, technological development and demonstration in the field of agriculture and fisheries’. More specifically, the contract was concerned with the carrying out of a project entitled ‘development of a new process in fruit cleansing and peeling’ and was to be performed within a period of 24 months from 1 September 1998. Under the contract the Commission entered into the obligation to make a financial contribution towards the proper execution of the project amounting to 50 % of the allowable costs, the maximum contribution being ECU 433 000.

Since the work had not been completed on the prescribed date (31 August 2000) and the defendant had not lodged a scientific report and a cost statement, as stipulated by the contract, the Commission decided to terminate the contract with effect from 24 February 2001. The subsequent correspondence between the defendant and the Commission did not, in the Commission's view, reveal new matters which could alter the content of the Commission's decision.

By its action, the Commission seeks reimbursement of the sum of EUR 259 800, which it paid to the defendant as an advance in respect of its financial contribution to the performance of the work, and payment of the interest due on that sum, in accordance with the relevant provisions of Greek law which is applicable under the contract.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 16.1

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

RE:  Speedcom Wireless Corporation, Inc.
     Commission File Number 0-21061

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have read Item 8 of Form 10-KSB dated March 30, 2001, of Speedcom Wireless
Corporation, Inc. and are in agreement with the statements contained therein as
they relate to Grant Thornton LLP. We have no basis to agree or disagree with
other statements of the Registrant contained therein.

                                          Very truly yours,



                                          Grant Thornton, LLP
IB 

Union Calendar No. 247 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2196 

[Report No. 115–342] 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to allow whistleblowers to disclose 

information to certain recipients. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2017 

Mr. RUSSELL (for himself, Mr. CUMMINGS, and Mr. LYNCH) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

OCTOBER 10, 2017 

Additional sponsor: Mr. FARENTHOLD

OCTOBER 10, 2017 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2196 RH

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to allow whistleblowers 

to disclose information to certain recipients. 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2196 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RECIPIENTS OF WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLO4 SURES. 

5 Section 2302(b)(8)(B) of title 5, United States Code, 

6 is amended by striking ‘‘or to the Inspector’’ and all that 

7 follows through ‘‘such disclosures’’ and inserting ‘‘the In8 spector General of an agency, a supervisor in the employ9 ee’s direct chain of command up to and including the head 

10 of the employing agency, the Director of National Intel11 ligence, the Inspector General of the Intelligence Commu12 nity, or to an employee designated by any of the aforemen13 tioned individuals for the purpose of receiving such disclo14 sures’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 247 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2196 

[Report No. 115–342] 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to allow 

recipients. whistleblowers to disclose information to certain 

OCTOBER 10, 2017 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2005077EN.01003301.xml

| 31.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/33

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/3723 — EQT/ISS/Healthcare/Carepartner/JV)

(2005/C 77/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 3 March 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3723. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3723. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1265 

To require the Secretary of Defense to make certain certifications to Congress 

before retiring B–1, B–2, or B–52 bomber aircraft. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 11, 2015 

Mr. ROUNDS (for himself, Mr. HOEVEN, Ms. HEITKAMP, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. 

CRUZ, and Mr. CASSIDY) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Defense to make certain certifications to Congress before retiring B–1, B–2, or B– 

52 bomber aircraft. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Long Range Bomber 

5 Sustainment Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATIONS ON RETIREMENT OF B–1, B–2, AND B– 

7 52 BOMBER AIRCRAFT. 

8 No B–1, B–2, or B–52 bomber aircraft may be re9 tired during a fiscal year unless the Secretary of Defense 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1265 IS

1 certifies, by not later than March 1 of the preceding fiscal 

2 year, that— 

3 (1) the retirement of the aircraft will not det4 rimentally affect the capacity of the Armed Forces 

5 of the United States to carry out the full range of 

6 long range bomber aircraft missions anticipated in 

7 operational plans of the Armed Forces in effect as 

8 of the date of the submission of that certification; 

9 (2) the Secretary has completed assessments 

10 of— 

11 (A) planning scenarios that span the range 

12 of plausible future challenges for such aircraft; 

13 and 

14 (B) the severity, likelihood, and imminence 

15 of risk associated with each such planning sce16 nario; 

17 (3) the Secretary has concluded, based on the 

18 assessments referred to in paragraph (2), that re19 tirements of B–1, B–2, and B–52 bomber aircraft in 

20 the near term will not detrimentally affect oper21 ational capability; and 

22 (4) the Secretary has developed a plan to re23 place any operational capability lost as a result of 

24 the retirement of such bomber aircraft. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Each of the undersigned officers of Intelligent Systems Corporation (the
"Company") hereby certifies to his or her knowledge that the Company's quarterly
report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report"), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 14, 2004                         /s/ J. Leland Strange
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           J. Leland Strange
                                           Chief Executive Officer


                                           /s/ Bonnie L. Herron
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Bonnie L. Herron
                                           Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                         72,889
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  167,130
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    30,231
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               300,545
<PP&E>                                         4,420,946
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,264,472
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,716,461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          272,871
<BONDS>                                        1,306,765
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    50
<COMMON>                                       16,749
<OTHER-SE>                                     973,669
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,716,461
<SALES>                                        246,068
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               246,068
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  136,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,534
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             19,228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                78,284
<INCOME-TAX>                                   35,306
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            42,978
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   42,978
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.25



</TABLE>
ATM on LBRI/2712
suet, WEEKLY DIARY

“ DOWNGPATED AT 12 YEAR
mm BG INTE VAY S}.ROT:. UMOWALICAELY.

i DESEASSic ED. DGD B.2-5200,10%-
Satellite systems

1. Commmication & Control Work Statement: (UNCL)
All work statements covering the C & C effort by both IMSD and
Philco are being reviewed by this office prior to negotiations.
The logistic effort, as presently outlined, requires a separate
supply function at some of the sites. It has been decided that
8.-single contractor showld be responsible for the supply function
‘ami logistics control of reparables at all sites. Also, this
contractor should have the housekeeping support responsibilities he
1 would be responsible for providing all support not available through
AFR 1i-k agreements. Both LMSD and Phileo have been asked to analyze
v this effort and submit a cost estimate as soon as possible. This
cost estimate and all other factors bearing on the situation will be
considered before a decision is made as to what contractor will be
given the responsibility.

2. I-60 Program Approvais: {SECRET

The OSD has approved the R&D Essential Programs, as reflected in
% he. development plans and as presented by AFBMD for the following
‘Programs in the fund amounts as indicated for FY 60:

7,

DISCOVERER
Samos 3 Y
MIDAS 51.0 million

Approval of the R&D Essential Program specifically precludes the
utilization of FY 60 funds for Operational/Development Programs which
have not been approved. In addition, release of FY 60 funds does not
constitute approval of the FY 61 program for SAMOS.

3. GBP Support of 8/8 I, Early Fix Project: (asenme)

At the request of AFEMD and RADC, this office scheduled a meeting
for the purpose of determining how GFP would be furnished TRW for
the EARLY FIX Project. RADC personnel were advised that SMAMA (LSM)
would respond to all requests for GFP in accordance with the procedures
SMAMA furnished TRY in January 1960. A meeting has been scheduled at

xe



Lockheed Aircraft Corporation, Missiles & Bpace Division, sold their
Company ced tee vale end Palo Alto to the Prodestial Life’ Trevates
Company and leased these properties back. This transaction took place
“in 1957. The Administrative Contracting Officer disallowed the lease
costs on the grounds that they vere not reasonable, The contractor
appeal sas regiPesi miter the Disputes Clause, and the hessine tate
week off Mees, fore the Armed Services Contract Appeal daeion 2
week of 4 March. Attendance at this hearing included representatives
from BMC and the AFPR. The Navy and Arm y vere also represented since

this action affects 19 contracts, including those of the other Departments
of DoD. :

5. Follow-On Procurement of rlon for Use in the Satellite
Recovery Program: TuRCL) rr

Mobile AMA ig Presently in the process of Procuring a second require.
ment of nylon rope in support of the 659%th Recovery Test Squadron

60 LBZJ-61