**FORM A -1** 

**PA RENT COMPA**  **NY INFORMA TION** 

**I. Parent Company / Legal Corporate Owner Information**

1. Legal Parent Company/ Legal Corporate Name Fibertek, LLC 2. Address 925 South 4400 W est 3. City Salt Lake City 4. State Utah 5. Zip Code 84104 6. County Salt Lake

7. Size of Company (approximate number of employ ees including all subsidiaries, branches, and related establishments owned): 100**FORM A -2** 

**FA CILITY INFORMA** 

**TION**

**II. Facility Information**

Facility Name Fibertek Facility Address Street 2222 W Bella Vista St City Lakeland State FL Zip Code 33810 County Polk Facility Coordinates Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 28° 4'0.05"N Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 81°59'30.72"W Specific location represented (e.g., front door of main building, centroid of property , etc.) Front Door

Number of employ ees attached to the wool fiberglass manufacturing facility : 68

Design capacity

of the plant (tons/y r) Confidential Business Information (CBI)

Ty pe(s) of process(es) (rotary spin, flame attenuation) at this plant rotary spin

Operation schedule hrs/day 24 days/y r 365

Identify what state and local air pollution rules and regulations, including permit requirements, your plant is subject to. (Please provide copies of permit(s) and permit IDs) Florida Department of Environmental Protection sy nthetic mi nor source for PM/PM10, and HAPS (formaldehy de, methanol, phenol)

**III. Technical Contact**

Name Jordan Radman Technical Contact Title President Telephone 801-972-3244 Facsimile (Fax) 801-972-0521 Email 

### jordan.radman@fibertekinsulation.com**IV. Other**

Is the facility

a major source of HAP? No

If No, did the facility take a limit of its potential HAP emissions to avoid classification as a major source: No

Does the facility

manufacture other products in addition to wool fiberglass? No

If Yes, list the other products manufactured at the facility

. Are there any

HAP em issions associated with any co-located facilities? List unit operations, e.g., boiler, and pollutant/emissions. No**FORM A -2** 

**FA CILITY INFORMA** 

**TION**

**II. Facility Information**

Facility Name Facility Address Street City State Zip Code County Facility Coordinates Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Specific location represented (e.g., front door of main building, centroid of property , etc.)

Number of employ ees attached to the wool fiberglass manufacturing facility :
Design capacity

of the plant (tons/y r)

Ty pe(s) of process(es) (rotary spin, flame attenuation) at this plant

Operation schedule hrs/day days/y r
Identify what state and local air pollution rules and regulations, including permit requirements, your plant is subject to. (Please provide copies of permit(s) and permit IDs)

**III. Technical Contact**

Name Technical Contact Title Telephone Facsimile (Fax) Email Permit included as attachment**IV. Other**

Is the facility

a major source of HAP?

If No, did the facility take a limit of its potential HAP emissions to avoid classification as a major source:

Does the facility

manufacture other products in addition to wool fiberglass?

If Yes, list the other products manufactured at the facility

. Are there any

HAP em issions associated with any co-located facilities? List unit operations, e.g., boiler, and pollutant/emissions.**FORM B-1**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**

**I. Overview of Plant Operations**

Number of process lines. Include lines that are currently operational or that are temporarily shutdown. (Do not include lines permanently shutdown). 2

For each process line: Process Line 1 Process Line 2 Process Line 3 Process line identification names or numbers Batt Line Unbonded Line

Ty pe of process line (e.g., rotary spin, flame attenuation) rotary spin rotary spin Maximum annual production rate (tons/y r) CBI CBI Age of process equipment (y rs) 5 5 Remaining economic life of process line (y rs) *N/A *N/A *Rebuilds produce indefinite life. List of products produced and most recent annual production (tons/y r; specify year) for each product CBI CBI

Please attach detailed schematics of each process line. flow diagram attachment**FORM B-1**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**

**I. Overview of Plant Operations**

Number of process lines. Include lines that are currently operational or that are temporarily shutdown. (Do not include lines permanently shutdown).

For each process line: Process line identification names or numbers

Ty pe of process line (e.g., rotary spin, flame attenuation) Maximum annual production rate (tons/y r) Age of process equipment (y rs) Remaining economic life of process line (y rs) List of products produced and most recent annual production (tons/y r; specify year) for each product

Please attach detailed schematics of each process line. *Rebuilds produce indefinite life.**FORM B-2**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**

**II. Process - Raw materials Handling and Storage**

Molten glass preparation

Raw materials and proportions bywt (%) As set forth in the May 5, 2010 NAIMA/industry letter to EPA, the glass formula based on industryaverage is soda ash 9%; borax 12%; cullet 34%; limestone 9%; and sand 31%. Method(s) of convey ing each raw material to furnace/pots Pneum atic Binder and Additives

List each raw material, including premixed materials, in the binder formulation and its proportion bywt (%) PF Resin (6-6.5%), Urea (3-3.8%), Ammonium sulfate (.3- .5%) Oil emulsion (1-2%), Silane (.05-.1%), Process Wa ter (80-85%) List steps in preparing binder, including storage temperature ( ° F) and holding time (hrs) CBI Total y early

consumption of binder (gal/y r) CBI Cost of binder ($/gal) for most recent y ear (specify y ear) CBI

Are binder storage and mixing tanks vented to outside/inside? inside Method of treating vent air from storage and mix tanks none Emission control during liquid raw material transfer from vehicles to storage tanks. Closed loop sy stem-tank truck to closed storage tank Describe future source reduction plans and schedules to reformulate binders; List each constituent, proportions wt (%), cost ($/gal) for reformulation none**FORM B-3**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**

**III. Process - Glass Melting Furnace**

For each Glass Melting Furnace: Furnace 1 Furnace 2 Furnace 3 Process unit identification name/number Middle Melter We st Melter Process line(s) served (identification name/number) Batt & Unbonded lines Batt & Unbonded lines Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 28° 3'57.79"N 28° 3'57.70"N Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 81°59'30.48"W 81°59'30.59"W Stack or vent height (units) 20 ft 20 ft Stack or vent diameter (units) 18 in 18 in Manufacturer and model Fibertek Fibertek Date of original installation 2005 2005 Estimate of remaining lifetime (y rs) 2 y rs 2 y rs Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild Frequency

of a major rebuild NA NA Cost of ty pical major rebuild NA NA Date of last major rebuild NA NA Purpose of last major rebuild NA NA Increase or decrease in emissions NA NA Fuel ty pe: electric, gas, or oil electric electric Fuel consumption rate (KW /ton of glass or Btu/ton of glass) CBI CBI List HAPs that are in refractory material chromium chromium Design production rate (tons/day ) CBI CBI Actual glass pull rate (tons/day ) CBI CBI Vent gas flow rate (acfm @ ° F) N/A N/A Temperature ( ° F) of molten glass in furnace and forehearth (if applicable) 2200 deg F furnace, 2050 deg F forehearth 2201 deg F furnace, 2050 deg F forehearth

Nature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenance procedures electrode changes- 2

mo nth frequency

taking 30-45 mins electrode changes- 2

mo nth frequency

taking 30-45 mins Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce

em issions None None

Describe future source reduction plans and schedules None None The company

undertakes routine refractory repair and replacement projects every

2 to 3 years. These projects do not impact the furnace

em issions, and therefore are not considered major rebuilds for the**FORM B-4**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**

**IV. Process - Forming -- Rotary Spin / Flame A ttenuation** 

For each Forming Operation -- Rotary Spin/Flame Attenuation Forming Operation 1 Forming Operation 2 Forming Operation 3 Process unit identification name/number Battline Process line(s) served (identification name/number) same as above Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 28° 3'58.04"N Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 81°59'30.82"W Stack or vent height (units) 140 ft Stack or vent diameter (units) 9 ft Number of fiber forming devices (spinners) per line. 4 Method of attenuating fiber (e.g., air, flame, or air and flame). Indicate ty pe of burner used (if flame). Air Is there a forehearth between the furnace and the forming section? Yes Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild Frequency

of a major rebuild NA Cost of ty pical major rebuild NA Date of last major rebuild NA Purpose of last major rebuild NA Increase or decrease in emissions NA If modular, number of modules and plenums 2 Presence of water overspray and application rate (gpm) none
Binder applied and application rate (gpm) PF resin (2.2gpm/spinner) Other material applied and application rate (gpm) none Temperature of glass fiber when binder is applied (°F) 2000 degF Temperature of binder when applied to fibers (°F) 70-80 deg F Method of evenly

distributing fibers onto forming convery or air lapping Formed mat thickness (in.) 12-26 in.

Forming air flow rate (acfm @ °F) 110,000 (acfm) @180 deg F (one common stack) Percent of forming air recirculated and percent exhausted 100% exhausted The company

undertakes routine repair and replacement projects that coincide with the furnace repairs. As with the furnace, these projects are normally“asis” maintenance projects that do not impact the emissions. The company does not consider these to be major rebuilds for the purpose of this ICR.Nature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenance procedures weekly maint/cleaning, Disk change Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce

em issions none
Describe future source reduction plans and schedules potential nonformaldehyde resin**FORM B-5**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**

**V. Process - Curing**

For each Curing Oven: Curing Oven 1 Curing Oven 2 Curing Oven 3 Process unit identification name/number Battline

Process line(s) served (identification name/number) same as above Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 28° 3'58.83"N Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 81°59'29.90"W Stack or vent height (units) 140 ft Stack or vent diameter (units) 9 ft Method of curing Forced hot air Manufacturer and model Fibertek design Date of original installation Jun-06 Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild Frequency

of a major rebuild NA Cost of ty pical major rebuild NA Date of last major rebuild NA Purpose of last major rebuild NA Increase or decrease in emissions NA Fuel ty pe: electric, gas, or oil gas Fuel consumption rate (KW /hr or BTU/hr) CBI Moisture content wt (%) of formed mat: inlet 2-3% outlet < 1% Air flow rate (acfm @ ° F) from curing 40,000 acfm @ 100 deg F Exhaust air temperature ( ° F) 150 deg F Residence time of product (mins) 1-3 mins Binder content of cured product (LOI) 5% Nature and frequency of routine/preventive

ma intenance procedures weekly conveyor cleaning, daily duct cleaning Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce emissions none The company

undertakes routine repair and replacement projects that coincide with the furnace repairs. As with the furnace, these projects are normally “as-is” maintenance projects that do not impact the emissions. The company does not consider these to be

ma jor rebuilds for the purpose of this ICR.Describe future source reduction plans and

schedules none**FORM B-6**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**

**VI. Process - Cooling**

For each Cooling Operation: Cooling Operation 1 Cooling Operation 2 Cooling Operation 3 Process unit identification name/number Battline

Process line(s) served (identification name/number) same as above Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 28° 3'59.56"N Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 81°59'29.05"W Stack or vent height (units) 140 ft Stack or vent diameter (units) 9 ft Cooling air flow rate (acfm @ ° F) 20,000 acfm @ 300 deg F Percentage of cooling air recirculated (if any ) none Cooling air temperature (°F) 75 deg F

Nature and frequency of routine/preventive

ma intenance procedures Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce emissions None

Describe future source reduction plans and schedules None The company

undertakes routine repair and replacement projects that coincide with the furnace repairs. As with the furnace, these projects are normally “as-is” maintenance projects that do not impact the emissions. The company does not consider these to be major rebuilds for the purpose of this ICR.**FORM B-7**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**

**VII. Process - Use of Solvents**

Use of Solvents Volatile solvents used at y our facility (where and how used) None List each solvent used and quantity(gal/y r) Emission control device(s) used to control emissions from solvent usage/storage?**FORM B-8**

**PROCESS OPERA TIONS** 

VIII. Pollution Prevention

Please describe any

work practices, pollution prevention techniques, and control strategies evaluated and/or implemented at each process unit at y our facility

(e.g., binder reformulation, alternative fuels usage, etc.) to reduce emissions of PM and HAPs y ou identified in Form E. You m ust specify

the y ear in which the facility im plem ented the practice/technique and identifythe emission reductions (if measured) from these practices/techniques. None**FORM C-1**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**I. Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP)**

For each ESP: ESP 1 ESP 2 ESP 3 Process line(s) (identification name/number) N/A Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) Manufacturer and model Date of original installation Number of collection plates and configuration Gas flow rate to ESP (acfm @ ° F) Inlet gas temperature ( ° F) Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Average stack opacity (%) Pressure drop across ESP (in. H 2 O gauge) Plate area (ft 2 ) Vendor guarantee on ESP efficency (attach copy ) Method of plate cleaning and frequency Flow rate of plate washwater to ESP (gpm), if applicable Temperature of plate washwater to ESP ( ° F), if applicable Source of plate washwater used for cleaning, if applicable Concentration (mg/l) of dissolved and suspended solids in plate washwater, if applicable Conditioning agents used and amounts (in gpm or lbs/hr), if applicable Amount of wastewater generated (gpd), if applicable Amount of wastewater recy cled (gpd), if applicable Amount of wastewater disposed of (gpd), if applicable Method of wastewater disposal, if applicalbe Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) Quantitiy

of solid waste recy cled (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r)Method of solid waste disposal

Nature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenance procedures Problems experienced with control device within the last five ye ars; how were problems solved? Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor ESP performance, including parameters monitored Describe any

plans to replace or upgrade ESP**FORM C-2**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**II. Scrubber**

For each Scrubber: Scrubber 1 Scrubber 2 Scrubber 3 Process line(s) (identification name/number) 

### Battline Battline Battline Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) 

### A-fan forming B-fan forming Oven/Cooiling Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 28° 3'57.67"N 28° 3'57.76"N 28° 3'58.25"N Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 81°59'30.96"W 81°59'30.82"W 81°59'30.02"W Stack or vent height (units) 140 ft 140 ft 140 ft Stack or vent diameter (units) 9 ft 9 ft 9 ft Manufacturer and model 

### Fibertek Design Fibertek Design Fibertek Design Date of original installation 

### Jun-06 Jun-06 Jun-06 Ty pe (e.g., venturi, orifice) 

### venturi venturi venturi Gas flow rate to scrubber (acfm @ ° F) 

### 60,000 acfm 50,000 acfm 40,000 acfm Inlet gas temperature ( ° F) 

### 180 deg F 180 deg F 150 deg F Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) 

### 105 deg F 105 deg F 100 deg F Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 

### na na na Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 

### 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 Average stack opacity (%) 

### 10% 10% 10% W ater flow rate to scrubber (gpm) 

### 300 gpm 225 gpm 225 gpm Percent of scrubber water from recy cled wastewater 

### 100% 100% 100%

Source of scrubbing water and ty pe of pretreatment. Substance(s) added as part of pretreatment and amount used (gpm or lbs/hr) 

### none none none HAP composition of wastewater (mg/L) 

### not known not known not known Concentration (mg/L) of dissolved and suspended solids in scrubbing water 

### not known not known not known Scrubbing water temperature ( ° F) 

### 65-70 deg F 65-70 deg F 65-70 deg F Liquid/gas ratio (gal/10 3 acfm) 

### not known not known not known Pressure drop across scrubber (in. H 2 O gauge) 

### 3.5 2 2.5 Amount of wastewater generated (gpd) Amount of wastewater recy cled (gpd) 

### 100% 100% 100% Amount of wastewater disposed of (gpd) 

### 0 0 0 8000 gpdMethod of wastewater disposal 

### 100% usage 100% usage 100% usage

Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste recy cled (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) Method of solid waste disposal 

### landfill landfill landfill Vendor guarantee on scrubber efficiency (attach copy ) 

### na na na

Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures 

### cleaning/ spray tip maintenance- monthly or as needed cleaning/ spray tip maintenance- monthly or as needed cleaning/ spray tip maintenance- monthly or as needed

Problems experienced with control device within the last five y ears; how were problem s solved? 

### flow meter failedreplaced, cleaned piping flow meter failedreplaced, cleaned piping flow meter failedreplaced, cleaned piping Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor scrubber performance, including parameters monitored 

### gpm and DP- recorded every 4 hrs gpm and DP- recorded every 4 hrs gpm and DP- recorded every 4 hrs Plans to replace or upgrade scrubber 

### none none none 900,000 lbs/ yr 200,000 lbs/yr 700,000 lbs/yr**FORM C-3**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**III. Mechanical Collector**

For each Mechanical Collector: Mechanical Collector 1 Mechanical Collector 2 Mechanical Collector 3 Process line(s) (identification name/number) 

### N/A Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) Manufacturer and model Date of original installation Ty pe of mechanical collector Gas flow rate to collector (acfm @ ° F) Inlet gas temperature ( ° F) Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Average stack opacity (%) Overall pressure drop (in. H 2 O gauge) Vendor guarantee on mechanical collector efficiency (attach copy ) Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste recy cled (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) Method of solid waste disposal

Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures Problems experienced with control device within the last five ye ars; how were problems solved? Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor performance, including parameters monitored Plans to replace or upgrade mechanical collector**FORM C-4**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**IV. Fabric Filter**

For each Fabric Filter: Fabric Filter 1 Fabric Filter 2 Fabric Filter 3

Process line(s) (identification name/number) 

### Middle Melter dust collector West Melter dust collector

Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) 

### Batch transport/Glass melting Batch transport/Glass melting Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 28° 3'57.79"N 28° 3'57.70"N Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 81°59'30.48"W 81°59'30.59"W Stack or vent height (units) 25 ft 25 ft Stack or vent diameter (units) 18 in 18 in Manufacturer and model 

### Mikropul-64s-8-20-tr-b Mikropul-64s-8-20-tr-b Date of original installation 

### Mar-06 Mar-06 Number of compartments 

### 1 1 Number of bags per compartment 

### 64 64

Filter material and coatings applied 

### hi temp fabric filter (nomax) hi temp fabric filter (nomax) Fabric weight (oz/yd 2 ) 

### 16 oz/ 1.04 yd2 16 oz/ 1.04 yd2 Filter surface area (ft 2 ) 

### 600 ft2 600 ft2 Gas flow rate to filter (acfm @ ° F) 

### 3600 acfm 3600 acfm Inlet gas temperature ( ° F) 

### 175 deg F Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) 

### 125 deg F Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 

### na na Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 

### na na Average stack opacity (%) 

### 5% 5% Overall pressure drop (in. H 2 O gauge) 

### 1-1.5 1-1.5 Method and frequency of bag cleaning 

### continuous air pulsing Vendor guarantee on fabric filter efficiency (attach copy ) 

### 99.9% (attachment) 99.9% (attachment) Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) 

### 0 0 Quantity

of solid waste recy cled (lbs/y r) 

### 100% 100%Quantity of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) 

### 0 0 Method of solid waste disposal 

### none none Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures 

### weekly PM on pulsars weekly PM on pulsars Problems experienced with control device within the last five years; how were problems solved? 

### holes in socks, replace sock holes in socks, replace sock Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor performance, including parameters monitored 

### Daily VE monitoring Daily VE monitoring Plans to replace or upgrade fabric filter 

### none none**FORM C-5**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**V. Thermal Incinerator**

For each Thermal Incinerator: Thermal Incinerator 1 Thermal Incinerator 2 Thermal Incinerator 3 Process line(s) (identification name/number) 

### N/A

Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) Manufacturer and model Date of original installation Fuel ty pe: gas or oil Fuel consumption rate (BTU/hr) Inlet gas flow rate (acfm @ ° F) Inlet gas temperature ( ° F) Combustion chamber gas temperature ( ° F) Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Average stack opacity (%) Excess air (%) Residence time (sec) at temperature ( ° F) Percent heat recovery Vendor guarantee on incinerator efficiency (attach copy ) Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures Problems experienced with control device within the last five years; how were problems solved?Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor

incinerator performance, including parameters monitored Plans to replace or upgrade thermal incinerator**FORM C-6**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**VI. High Velocity A ir Filter (HVA**  **F)**

For each HVAF: HVAF 1 HVAF 2 HVAF 3 Process line(s) (identification name/number) 

### N/A

Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) Manufacturer and model Date of original installation Inlet gas flow rate (acfm @ ° F) Inlet gas temperature ( ° F) Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Average stack opacity (%) W ater spray

pressure (sdig), if applicable W ater spray

rate (gpm), if applicable Filter face velocity

(acfm/ft 2 )

Maximum pressure drop across mat (in. H 2 O gauge)

Vendor guarantee on HVAF efficiency (attach copy ) Method and frequency of filter mad advancement Amount of wastewater generated (gpd) Amount of wastewater recy cled (gpd) Amount of wastewater disposed of (gpd) Method of wastewater disposal Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r)Quantity of solid waste recy cled (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) Method of solid waste disposal Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures Problems experienced with control device within the last five years; how were problems solved?

Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor HVAF performance, including parameters monitored Plans to replace or upgrade HVAF**FORM C-7**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**VII. Mist Eliminator**

For each Mist Eliminator: Mist Eliminator 1 Mist Eliminator 2 Mist Eliminator 3 Process line(s) (identification name/number) 

### N/A Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 plot plan) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) Manufacturer and model Date of original installation Ty pe of mist eliminator Gas flow rate to mist eliminator (acfm @ ° F) Inlet gas temperature ( ° F) Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Average stack opacity (%) Velocity

in m ist elim inator (ft/sec) Pressure drop (in. H 2 O gauge) For chevron blade mist eliminators: Spacing between blades (in.) W ashing frequency of blades For mesh pad mist eliminators: Number of pads or elements Thickness of pad (in.) or element dimensions Density

of pad, (lb/ft 3 ) W ashing frequency of pad

Vendor guarantee on mist eliminator efficiency (attach copy ) Amount of wastewater generated (gpd)Amount of wastewater recy cled (gpd)

Amount of wastewater disposed of (gpd) Method of wastewater disposal Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste recy cled (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) Method of solid waste disposal

Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures Problems experienced with control device within the last five ye ars; how were problems solved? Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor mist eliminator performance, including parameters monitored Plans to replace or upgrade mist eliminator**FORM C-8**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**VIII. Ventilation System**

For each Ventilation System: Ventilation System 1 Ventilation System 2 Ventilation System 3 Process line(s) (identification name/number) N/A Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) For general or building ventilation: Ventilation system used Airflow control system used Number of air changes per hour For unit or local ventilation: Enclosure or hood design used Volume of enclosure or hood Capture velocity (ft/sec) Distance between hood and emission source (ft)**FORM C-9**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**IX. Other**

For each Other Air Pollution Control Device (APCD): Other APCD 1 Other APCD 2 Other APCD 3 Process line(s) (identification name/number) 

### N/A Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) Description**FORM D**

**PROCESS LINE STA RTUP A**  **ND SHUTDOWN**

1. For each startup and shutdown (SS) that occurred during the last five y ears, please provide the following information requested in A. through J.

A. Using the definitions provided above, indicate whether the event was a startup or shutdown; Middle Melter: 9/1/05 start-up, 11/14/07 refractory replacement, 5/17/09 refractory replacement B. A description of the event, including identification of the

em issions source or sources associated with the startup or shutdown; start-up of the melter. Fabric filter dust collector in operation. C. W hether any

permit condition was exceeded and, if so, what permit condition was exceeded; no condtions exceeded

D. W hether the event was covered by any contingency

plan for controlling emissions during startup and shutdown events and, if so, whether the plan was followed; if the plan was not followed, why not; dust collector was verifed and tested before melter startup. E. The duration of the event; 3-5 days F. The actions taken to minimize emissions during the event, including the use of any backup control systems; Visual testing (VE) completed to insure dust collector operating properly G. Estimates or measurements, if any , of emissions during the event; if you did not have the ability to quantify

emissions during the event, please explain why ; PM: < 5.7 lbs/ton glass, Formaldehyde: .8 lbs/ton glass, Phenol: .88 lbs/ton glass, Methanol: .88 lbs/ton glass. H. W hether the emission profile of each unit was different during startup and shutdown than during normal operating conditions and, if so, how emissions were different and why ; please provide any supporting information; na I. All performance test data collected during each period of SS; the test method used for each event; when the testing was conducted and why ; the test conditions at the time of testing; and whether the tests were associated with a routine startup or shutdown; and attachment J. All monitoring data, including control system parameter

mo nitoring, collected during each period of SS. attachment Startup: the setting in operation of an affected source or portion of an affected source for any purpose. Shutdown: the cessation of operation of an affected source or portion of an affected source for any purpose.If this information is contained in periodic and immediate SS reports

(either stand-alone or contained within the periodic excess emissions report) submitted to your permitting authority , you may submit copies of those reports instead.

2. Are there any

ty pes of startup or shutdown events that you have been able to elim inate? If so, please describe the ty pe of event and explain how these events were elim inated. No 3. Please submit a copy of your SS plan if you are required to develop one. na 4. Please provide all performance test data collected during periods of SS over the last 5 years. Indicate the test method used for each event. attachement 5. Please provide all m onitoring data, including control system parameter monitoring, collected during periods of SS over the last 5 ye ars. attachement 6. Optional: Do you wish to recommend a standard that would apply during startup or shutdown? If so, please describe the event to which the standard would apply ; the recommended standard (this could be an emission limitation, work practice, or operational standard) that would apply during the period; the basis for the recommended standard; why and how the standard would m inim ize

em issions during the event; and how would compliance be determined and/or monitored. no**FORM D**

**PROCESS LINE STA RTUP A**  **ND SHUTDOWN**

1. For each startup and shutdown (SS) that occurred during the last five y ears, please provide the following information requested in A. through J.

A. Using the definitions provided above, indicate whether the event was a startup or shutdown; B. A description of the event, including identification of the

em issions source or sources associated with the startup or shutdown; C. W hether any

permit condition was exceeded and, if so, what permit condition was exceeded;

D. W hether the event was covered by any contingency

plan for controlling emissions during startup and shutdown events and, if so, whether the plan was followed; if the plan was not followed, why not; E. The duration of the event; F. The actions taken to minimize emissions during the event, including the use of any backup control systems; G. Estimates or measurements, if any , of emissions during the event; if you did not have the ability to quantify

emissions during the event, please explain why ; H. W hether the emission profile of each unit was different during startup and shutdown than during normal operating conditions and, if so, how emissions were different and why ; please provide any supporting information; I. All performance test data collected during each period of SS; the test method used for each event; when the testing was conducted and why ; the test conditions at the time of testing; and whether the tests were associated with a routine startup or shutdown; and J. All monitoring data, including control system parameter

mo nitoring, collected during each period of SS. Startup: the setting in operation of an affected source or portion of an affected source for any purpose. Shutdown: the cessation of operation of an affected source or portion of an affected source for any purpose.

We st Melter: 3/1/06 start-up, 4/18/08 refractory replacement

start-up of the melter. Fabric filter dust collector in operation.

no condtions exceeded

dust collector was verifed and tested before melter startup. 3-5 days Visual testing (VE) completed to insure dust collector operating properly

PM: < 5.7 lbs/ton glass, Formaldehyde: .8 lbs/ton glass, Phenol: .88 lbs/ton glass, Methanol: .88 lbs/ton glass.

na

attachment

attacmentIf this information is contained in periodic and immediate SS reports

(either stand-alone or contained within the periodic excess emissions report) submitted to your permitting authority , you may submit copies of those reports instead.

2. Are there any

ty pes of startup or shutdown events that you have been able to elim inate? If so, please describe the ty pe of event and explain how these events were elim inated. 3. Please submit a copy of your SS plan if you are required to develop one. 4. Please provide all performance test data collected during periods of SS over the last 5 years. Indicate the test method used for each event. 5. Please provide all m onitoring data, including control system parameter monitoring, collected during periods of SS over the last 5 ye ars. 6. Optional: Do you wish to recommend a standard that would apply during startup or shutdown? If so, please describe the event to which the standard would apply ; the recommended standard (this could be an emission limitation, work practice, or operational standard) that would apply during the period; the basis for the recommended standard; why and how the standard would m inim ize

em issions during the event; and how would compliance be determined and/or monitored. No

na

attachement

attachement

no**FORM E**

**PRESENCE OF A IR POLLUTA**  **NTS IN EMISSION POINTS a** 

Please provide any

existing emissions information and data covering hazardous air pollutants (HAP) and particulate

ma tter (PM) for each listed process. Identify the appropriate box for which you are providing specific process information and/or pollutant emissions data. **Me lting Furnace(s)**  **Forming Curing**  **Cooling**

Particulate Matter (PM, PM 2.5, PM Condensable) Chromium Compounds and Hexavalent Chromium (including any

Cr speciation data) Other metal HAP (As, Be, Cd, Co, Hg, Mn, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se) Hydrogen Fluoride (HF)
Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Formaldehyde
Phenol
Methanol Other organic HAP All information has been provided by Naim a in Letter dated May 5, 2010.**FORM F-1**

**COST**

**I. Process Unit (e.g., cupola, curing oven**  **, etc.):**

For each Process Unit: Process Unit 1 Process Unit 2 Process Unit 3 Process Unit ID Process Line ID

**II. Capital Costs** Base year Total capital cost, including costs for individual pieces, if available. **III. A nnual Operating Costs**  Base year (most recent fiscal y ear) Total annual operating costs

Maintenance materials and replacement parts (specify costs by item ) Raw m aterials costs Labor ($/y r) for each labor class (hr/hr) for each labor class

Utilities (breakdown for each utility ) W aste treatment and/or disposal Costs associated with any work practices and pollution prevention techniques that are employ ed at your facility Savings associated with heat recovery and wastewater and/or solid waste returned to process from APCD (or sold to another user) Indirect costs Other (specify )

Please provide the annual report to shareholders or equivalent for the most recent fiscal y ear. If reports are not available, provide annual sales and profits (or profit margin) for the most recent fiscal y ear. If company is publicly owned, please provide a web link to this information. 

### The company **objects to this request because it seeks information that is not relevant to the EPA**  **A dministrator’s**  **review obligations pursuant to Clean A**  **ir A ct Section**  **112(d)(6) and 112(f)(2).**Identify

the market range (regional, national, international) of your products.

Can your product(s) be substituted by another product(s)? If so, please list yo ur product(s) and substituted product(s). Wo ol fiberglass insulation comprises more than 70 percent of the residential insulation m aterial used in the United States. The remaining percentage of the

ma rket consists of cellulose (scrap newspaper) treated to resist fires, spray foam, foam boards, cotton treated to resist fires, and sheep wool treated to resist fires. W ool fiberglass insulation is preferred over these alternative insulation m aterials because it is easily , economically , and safety installed in various building settings, has superior fire performance capabilities, and a 70- ye ar history

of proven performance and durability**FORM F-2**

**COST**

**I. A ir Pollution Control Device (A**  **PCD)**

For each APCD: APCD 1 APCD 2 APCD 3 APCD ID Process Unit ID

**II. Capital Costs** Base year APCD equipm ent purchase cost and what was included List the cost for each piece of auxiliary equipm ent for each APCD not included above Installation cost Land purchase cost Total capital cost Method of financining APCD Retrofit installation Field erected or modular

**III. A nnual Operating Costs**  Base year (most recent fiscal y ear) Maintenance materials and replacement parts (specify costs by item ) Raw m aterials costs Labor ($/y r) for each labor class (hr/hr) for each labor class Utilites (breackdown for each utility ) W aste treatment and/or disposal Indirect costs 

### The company **objects to this request because it seeks information that is not relevant to the EPA**  **Ad ministrator’s review**  **obligations pursuant to Clean Ai**  **r A ct Section 112(d)(6) and 112(f)(2).** Other (specify )

Total annual operating cost (most recent fiscal y ear)

Attach annual report to shareholders or equivalent for the most recent fiscal y ear. Alternatively , if company is publicly

owned, you can provide your company 's web link to this information.