alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST M & F CORPORATION





EXHIBIT 32.2





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS





In connection with the Quarterly Report of First M&F Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John G. Copeland, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:





A.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





B.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
May 13, 2011





/s/ John G. CopelandJohn G. CopelandEVP & Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                              PHASE METRICS, INC.

                   STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF RATIOS
                         (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)

                 RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
                         AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                              YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                         ---------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          1994     1995       1996        1997       1998        1999
                                                         ------   -------   --------    --------    --------    --------
<S>                                                      <C>      <C>       <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Earnings:
  Income (loss) before income taxes and extraordinary
   items................................................ $  943   $ 6,193   $(19,842)   $ (9,812)   $(66,506)   $(47,202)
  Fixed charges:
    Interest expense....................................    651     5,625      8,448      11,573      14,456      13,809
    Rental expense interest factor(1)...................     60       178      1,133       1,700       1,600       1,133
                                                         ------   -------   --------    --------    --------    --------
      Total fixed charges...............................    711     5,803      9,581      13,273      16,056      14,942
                                                         ------   -------   --------    --------    --------    --------
                                                         $1,654   $11,996   $(10,261)   $  3,461    $(50,450)   $(32,260)
                                                         ======   =======   ========    ========    ========    ========

Combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividend
 requirements........................................... $1,598   $10,390   $ 14,581    $ 18,145    $ 19,337    $ 18,664
                                                         ======   =======   ========    ========    ========    ========

Ratio of earnings (loss) to fixed charges(2)............    1.0x      1.2x        --          --          --          --
                                                         ======   =======   ========    ========    ========    ========
</TABLE>
________________________
(1)   The portion of operating lease rental expense that is representative of
      the interest factor is deemed to be one-third of total operating lease
      rental expense.

(2)   For the years ended December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999, earnings were
      inadequate to cover Fixed Charges by $12.7 million, $69.8 million, and
      $50.9 million respectively.
EXHIBIT 21.1**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**1. Dynamex Operations East Inc., a Delaware corporation — 10,000 authorized shares of commonstock, $0.01 par value, 1,000 of which are issued and outstanding and registered in the nameof Dynamex Inc. 2. Dynamex Operations West Inc., a Delaware corporation — 10,000 authorized shares of commonstock, $0.01 par value, 1,000 of which are issued and outstanding and registered in the nameof Dynamex Inc. 3. Dynamex Canada Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation — 10,000 authorized shares of commonstock, $0.01 par value, 100 of which are issued and outstanding and registered in the name ofDynamex Inc. 4. Dynamex Provincial Couriers, Inc., a Delaware corporation — 10,000 authorized shares ofcommon stock, $0.01 par value, 100 of which are issued and outstanding and registered in thename of Dynamex Inc. 5. Dynamex Fleet Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation — 10,000 authorized shares of commonstock, $0.01 par value, 1,000 of which are issued and outstanding and registered in the nameof Dynamex Inc. 6. Dynamex Franchise Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation — 10,000 authorized shares of commonstock, $0.01 par value, 1,000 of which are issued and outstanding and registered in the nameof Dynamex Inc.
;NRerPPROVED FOR -

'RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

't 

..,. 

7-P 

OTIMIKMIE13 

Richard Reims 

BYE# 6409-68y 2d9 

tig.13 

, egging SPI. clij 

Inntrl; 

1- 1: ty 

r 

L...._ ._ 

Director 

ev. 

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25. D. C. AVORKING PAPERS 

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR 

t 5 VAR 1S61.1 

MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director of Defense Research 

and Engineering 

SUBJECT Intelligence RequirementS for the 

VIOL Program 

1. Mr. Carl Duckett has advised me of your 

telephone conversation with him on Saturday and we 

have subsequently reviewed the Development Concept 

paper for IDOL provided by your staff. It you wish 

to insert a reference to my reservations as to the 

intelligence requirements for this system, I suggest 

it might be dote on Page 2 in that portion referring 

to the 1965 study by USIB's Committee on Overhead 

Reconnaissance or on Page 10 where concurrences 

with Secretary McNamara's recommendation are shown. 

The following statement summarizes my views: 

Mr. Helms, Director of Central Intelligence, 

has reservations as to the value of 

resolution photography for 

national intelligence purposes. Ee 

recognizes that photography with resolution 

better than that obtainable by the GAMBIT - 3 

System would be helpful but does not 

believe studiez.-conducted to date show that 

the value of this increased reselution 

justifies the expenditures associated with 

the :XL Program. Ee has initiated a review 

of these studies. 

2. I hope this statement will servo your immediate 

needs and I will advise you when our study is completed.
# C_2005086EN.01000101.xml

| 8.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 April 2005

(2005/C 86/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2923 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,84 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4493 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6874 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1478 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5497 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 78,94 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,162 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5833 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,958 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,40 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6962 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4304 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1081 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 447 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,7 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,9 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7354 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6798 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5746 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,079 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8057 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1383 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 308,45 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9137 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,6957 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,411 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 263,93 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9106 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 70,398 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,963 |
| THB | Thai baht | 51,196 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2923

JPY

Japanese yen

139,84

DKK

Danish krone

7,4493

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6874

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1478

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5497

ISK

Iceland króna

78,94

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,162

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5833

CZK

Czech koruna

29,958

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,40

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6962

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4304

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1081

ROL

Romanian leu

36 447

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,7

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,9

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7354

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6798

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5746

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,079

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8057

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1383

KRW

South Korean won

1 308,45

ZAR

South African rand

7,9137

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,6957

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,411

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 263,93

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9106

PHP

Philippine peso

70,398

RUB

Russian rouble

35,963

THB

Thai baht

51,196

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### Maki and wife, Appellants, vs. Lake Superior District Power Company, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Iron county dated June 17, 1926: G. N. Risjord, Judge.

Personal injuries. Judgment for defendant, from which plaintiffs appeal.

For the appellants: *Reid & Reid*of Hurley, attorneys, and *C. A. Lamoreux*of Ashland, of counsel.

For the respondent: *Sanborn, Lamoreux & Pray*of Ash-land.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

 

|  

**List Of Subsidiaries**

 

Optimal Robotics, Inc., a Delaware corporationOptimal Services Group Inc., a Canadian corporationOptimal Payments Inc., a Canadian corporation4295382 Canada Inc. (formerly FireCash Ltd.), a Canadian corporationOptimal Payments Holdings Limited, an English corporationOptimal Payments Limited, an English corporationOptimal Payments Corp., a Delaware corporationMicro Tempus Corporation, a Delaware corporation3507637 Canada Inc., a Canadian corporationMicro Tempus GmbH, a German corporationOnline Processing Limited, an Israelicorporation

 

FireOne Group plc, an Irish corporation

OG Processing Services Holdings, an Irish corporation

4287258 Canada Inc., a Canadian corporation

FPA Processing Services Inc., a New Brunswick corporation

FirePay Ltd., a Bermuda corporation

FirePay UK Limited, an English corporation

Optimal Acquisition Inc., a Canadian corporation

 

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 32.1

# Certificate of Chief
Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 dated August 1, 2003

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer CNET
Networks, Inc. (CNET) hereby certifies that:

| | 1. | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CNET for the annual period ended December 31,
               2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 27, 2004
               (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
               15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CNET.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Dated:   February 27, 2004 /S/ Shelby W. Bonnie
Shelby W. BonnieChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to CNET and will be
retained by CNET and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8648-8649]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03284]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies

[[Page 8649]]

owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed 
below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 13, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Hill Road Financial Holdings LLC and Hill Road Acquisition 
Corporation, both of Chicago, Illinois; to become bank holding 
companies by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Citizens 
First State Bank of Walnut, Walnut, Illinois.
    2. Sturgis Bancorp, Inc., Sturgis, Michigan; to acquire 100 percent 
of the voting shares of The West Michigan Savings Bank, Bangor, 
Michigan.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 12, 
2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-03284 Filed 2-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEUDLE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 29, 1996
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                          18,849
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,608
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,590
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,746
<PP&E>                                          11,363
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,556
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  64,553
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,409
<BONDS>                                            207
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           182
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,755
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    64,553
<SALES>                                        204,748
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               204,748
<CGS>                                           92,042
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,042
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               101,582
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 173
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,212
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,741
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,471
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,471
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.80
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 98-6995

EDWARD JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.

Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge.

(CR-95-184-A, CA-98-99-AM)

Submitted: November 19, 1998

Decided: December 7, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and

BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Edward Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn Cameron Alexander,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Edward Johnson appeals the district court's order denying his

motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998) as time-barred and a subsequent order denying his motion to

alter or amend the district court's first order. Because we find that

Johnson's § 2255 motion was timely filed, we vacate and remand.

Johnson's conviction was affirmed on direct appeal by this Court

on September 10, 1996. The United States Supreme Court denied his

petition for a writ of certiorari on January 13, 1997. Johnson, an

incarcerated inmate, mailed his § 2255 motion on January 9, 1998.

Because Johnson filed his § 2255 motion within a year after his petition for a writ of certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court, we conclude that the district court erred in dismissing Johnson's motion as

untimely filed. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255; Williams v. Dixon, 961 F.2d

448, 453 n.2 (4th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, we grant a certificate of

appealability as to the district court's timeliness determination, vacate

the district court's order denying his § 2255 motion, and remand for

further proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

 2
EXHIBIT
23




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of River
Valley Bancorp on Form S-8 of our report, dated March 12, 2008, on our audits of
the consolidated financial statements of River Valley Bancorp as of December 31,
2007 and 2006 and for each of the years then ended, which report is incorporated
by reference in River Valley Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2007.







/s/
      BKD, LLPBKD,
      LLPIndianapolis,
      IndianaMarch
      12, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40427

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROBERTO MENDOZA-GUTIERREZ, also known as Robert Cantu-Mendoza,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:15-CR-860-1

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Roberto Mendoza-Gutierrez has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Mendoza-Gutierrez has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 1, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40427 Document: 00513780499 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/01/2016
No. 16-40427

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-40427 Document: 00513780499 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/01/2016