alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1303 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the enrollment of veterans 

in certain courses of education, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 12, 2015 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. TILLIS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the 

enrollment of veterans in certain courses of education, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Education 

5 Priority Enrollment Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PRIORITY ENROLLMENT FOR VETERANS IN CER7 TAIN COURSES OF EDUCATION. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 36 of title 38, United 

9 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 3680A 

10 the following new section: 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1303 IS

1 ‘‘§ 3680B. Priority enrollment in certain courses 

2 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—With respect to an educational 

3 assistance program provided for in chapter 30, 31, 32, 33, 

4 or 35 of this title or chapter 1606 or 1607 of title 10, 

5 if an educational institution administers a priority enroll6 ment system that allows certain students to enroll in 

7 courses earlier than other students, the Secretary or a 

8 State approving agency may not approve a program of 

9 education offered by such institution unless such institu10 tion allows a covered individual to enroll in courses at the 

11 earliest possible time pursuant to such priority enrollment 

12 system. 

13 ‘‘(b) COVERED INDIVIDUAL DEFINED.—In this sec14 tion, the term ‘covered individual’ means an individual 

15 using educational assistance under chapter 30, 31, 32, 33, 

16 or 35 of this title or chapter 1606 or 1607 of title 10, 

17 including— 

18 ‘‘(1) a veteran; 

19 ‘‘(2) a member of the Armed Forces serving on 

20 active duty or a member of a reserve component (in21 cluding the National Guard); 

22 ‘‘(3) a dependent to whom such assistance has 

23 been transferred pursuant to section 3319 of this 

24 title; and 

25 ‘‘(4) any other individual using such assist26 ance.’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1303 IS

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting 

3 after the item relating to section 3680A the following new 

4 item: 

‘‘3680B. Priority enrollment in certain courses.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7507

LARRY W. CALL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JIM REASON; DOCTOR LIGHTSEY; JOHN DOE, other

unknown defendants at DOC and Medical Review

Board,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District

Judge. (CA-00-561-5-BR)

Submitted: February 20, 2001 Decided: March 12, 2001

Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry W. Call, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Larry W. Call, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district

court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.

2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (West Supp. 2000)

and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 motion. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of Call’s complaint.

Call v. Reason, No. CA-00-561-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 29 & Sept. 13,

2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 28 February 2006         

amending Annex II to Council Decision 79/542/EEC as regards the entries for Brazil, Montenegro and Serbia

(notified under document number C(2006) 579)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/360/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 2002/99/EC of 16 December 2002 laying down the animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption (1), and in particular the introductory phrase of Article 8, the first paragraph of point (1) of Article 8 and point (4) of Article 8 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Part 1 of Annex II to Decision 79/542/EEC is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 February 2006.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 18, 23.1.2003, p. 11.

(2)OJ L 146, 14.6.1979, p. 15. Decision as last amended by Commission Decision 2005/753/EC (OJ L 282, 26.10.2005, p. 22).

(3)OJ L 151, 14.6.2005, p. 3.

(4)OJ L 282, 26.10.2005, p. 22.

----

ANNEX

                     ‘ANNEX II

(FRESH MEAT)

Part 1

LIST OF THIRD COUNTRIES OR PARTS THEREOF (*1)

Specific conditions referred to in column 6

“1”: Geographic and timing restrictions:

“2”: Category restrictions:

No offal authorised (except, in the case of bovine species, diaphragm and masseter muscles).’                                    

----

(*1)  Without prejudice to specific certification requirements provided for by Community agreements with third countries.

(*2)  Not including Kosovo as defined by United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 of 10 June 1999.

(*3)  The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia; provisional code that does not prejudge in any way the definitive nomenclature for this country, which will be agreed following the conclusion of negotiations currently taking place on this subjet in the United Nations.

(*4)  Serbia and Montenegro are Republics with individual customs territory forming a State Union and therefore have to be listed separately.

----
ADVANCED SYSTEM FOR SYSTEMS OF HIGHEST RESOLUTION THAT STATE OF THE ART
WILL ALLOW AMD SHOULD INCLUDE ASSOCIATED ATTITUDE STABILIZATION SYS-
TEM AND APPROPRIATE RECOVERY SYSTEM; (D) COMSIDER EARLIEST FLIGHTS

od F~2 AND E-2 WHERE NECESSARY TO MEET

USIB REQUIREMENTS; (E) PLAN FOR THOR/AGENA AMD TITAL LAUNCHES TO

a
5
i
g

BOOSTER PRODUCTION SCHEDULES AMD PRESENT THE RESULTS TO THE AFBMC
AS SOOM AS PRATICABLE.

PART IV. THE POINT ARQUELLO COMPLEX WILL BE THE SUBJECT OF
SSPARATE ACTION FROM AFOCE.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1362 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1362

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen

                                 An Act

 
To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to clarify waiver authority 
     regarding programs of all-inclusive care for the elderly (PACE 
                               programs).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY REGARDING PACE PROGRAMS.
    Subsection (d)(1) of section 1115A of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1315a) is amended by striking ``and 1903(m)(2)(A)(iii)'' and 
inserting ``1903(m)(2)(A)(iii), and 1934 (other than subsections 
(b)(1)(A) and (c)(5) of such section)''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
H. R. 2122 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a hydroelectric project involving Jennings Randolph Dam. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REINSTATEMENT AND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR A FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT 

INVOLVING JENNINGS RANDOLPH DAM. 

(a) EXTENSION OF TIME.—Notwithstanding the time period 

specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) 

that would otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission project numbered 12715 (referred to in this section 

as the ‘‘project’’), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

(referred to in this section as the ‘‘Commission’’) may, at the request 

of the licensee for the project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of, and the procedures of the Commission under, that section, 

extend the time period during which the licensee is required to 

commence the construction of the project for not more than 3 

consecutive 2-year periods that begin on the date of the expiration 

of the extension originally issued by the Commission. 

(b) OBLIGATION OF LICENSEE.—Any obligation of the licensee 

for the project for the payment of annual charges under section 

10(e) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 803(e)) shall commence 

on the expiration of the time period to commence construction 

of the project, as extended by the Commission under subsection 

(a). 

(c) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—If the period required for the commencement of construction of the project has expired before the date 

of enactment of this Act, the Commission may reinstate the 

license effective as of the date of the expiration of the license. 
H. R. 2122—2 

(2) EXTENSION.—If the Commission reinstates the license 

under paragraph (1), the first extension authorized under subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the expiration of 

the license. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

July 1, 2015 

Mr. Thomas A. Enyart 

Manager, Certification & Airworthiness 

The Boeing Company 

Boeing Commercial Airplanes 

Southern California Engineering Design Center 

2401 E. Wardlow Road, Mail Code D800-0022 

Long Beach, CA 90807-5309 

Dear Mr. Enyart: 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, Washington 98057-3356 

We have received your letter no. CP-L4L-15-00122, dated May 1, 2015, petitioning for 

exemption from the requirements ofTitle 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 

26.21 (b )(2)(ii). 

The exemption, if granted, would provide relief from the FAA-approved binding schedule, 

for Boeing Model DC-8 airplanes, which identifies those maintenance actions for which 

service information has not been mandated by airworthiness directive as of January 14, 

2011. 

Your petition, which you submitted to the Department of Transportation's Federal Docket 

Management System (FDMS) at regulations.gov, is in docket no. FAA-2015-1669. 

We are in the process of reviewing your request, and will contact you if we need additional 

information. 

If you have questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please 

contact Walt Sippel at 425-227-2774, or e-mail walt.sippel@faa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

Mark Forseth 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

Aircraft Certification Service
NO. 07-05-0083-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	MARCH 8, 2005

	______________________________

	CLARE CONSTAT, LTD. and STEPHEN YORK TAYLOR,

										Appellants

	V.

	MAX SWINBURN,

										Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 242ND DISTRICT COURT OF CASTRO COUNTY;

	NO. B-8243-0404; HON. ED SELF, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	Appellants Clare Constat, Ltd. and Stephen York Taylor filed a notice of appeal on February 25, 2005.  However, they did not pay the $125 filing fee required from appellants under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 5.  Nor did they file an affidavit of indigence per Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1.  By letter from this Court dated February 25, 2005, we informed appellants that “the filing fee in the amount of $125.00 has not been paid . . . .  Failure to pay the filing fee within ten (10) days from the date of this notice may result in a dismissal.”  Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c); see Holt v. F. F. Enterprises, 990 S.W.2d 756 (Tex. App.--Amarillo 1998, pet. ref’d).  The deadline lapsed, and the fee was not received. 

	Because appellants have failed to pay the requisite filing fee as directed by the court, we dismiss the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c). 

							Per Curiam
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

WASHINGTON 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

January 13, 1967 

MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, MANNED ORBITING LABORATORY (MOL) 

PROGRAM 

SUBJECT: Authorization to Proceed with the Engineering 

Development Phase of the MOL Program 

As Director of the MOL Program, you are authorized to 

continue with the engineering development of the MOL System. 

Release of DOD deferred FY 67 funds in the amount of 

$120,000,000 is granted to continue the contracted MOL Phase 

II Development Program with the understanding that actual 

obligations and expenditures on each major segment of the 

program are to be reviewed in detail prior to release of 

remaining FY 67 funds. Control of FY 67 and FY 68 expenditures and commitments to minimum levels compatible with 

approved program objectives is essential. FY 67 funding is 

now established at a maximum of $228 million. However, reductions of FY 67 program fund requirements which may result 

from actions initiated or taken at the January 5, 1967 MOL 

management meeting should be fully considered. FY 68 funding levels will be established following resolution of issues 

addressed at that meeting and updating of the financial plan 

based on actual experience prior to the last quarter of FY 67. 

I request to be advised on a continuing basis of any 

disparity that might exist between fund availability and baseline requirements as actual experience in obligating funds 

develops. Based on this experience, reprogramming of additional 

program funds, as necessary, or alternatively slipping development and flight schedules for all or part of the baseline 

program will be examined. 

hePtIre 

Alexander H. Flax 

Assistant Secretary 

Research & Development
Exhibit 32A

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AutoInfo, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harry Wachtel,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company. A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.


/s/ Harry Wachtel
-----------------
Harry Wachtel
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: May 11, 2007


                                       19
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) by ProElite, Inc., (“Registrant”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant as of and for the periods presented in the Report.





Date: November 18, 2011











/s/ Paul FellerPaul Feller

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000350194
<NAME> UNITED SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          118923
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   489035
<ALLOWANCES>                                     75000
<INVENTORY>                                       2916
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                535874
<PP&E>                                         1846363
<DEPRECIATION>                                  123696
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                23382236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1194176
<BONDS>                                          66694
<COMMON>                                       3364315
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     205000
<OTHER-SE>                                     4589651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2382236
<SALES>                                          65236
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                414573
<CGS>                                             4769
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   296066
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                113520
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2127
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (125604)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (125604)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (125604)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
ADVANSED RESEARCH PnOsECTS AGENCY
WASHINGTON 29, ¢.

, SOs" + - Tha Bosvotary Cf ore Ete Pozen |
. _ Woskinoter ab, o 6. . 6

Tho seopram clicetives ani rduisd fending fee to :
BNCOVOALR prograzs as press to SADA Dekeurry 4 1953, oa '
dag, ia genoral, agsreved, | whee .

_ 3 ie partieutenty noted that thie expeoval portains te ths
13 weticle progzer. re ,

| _ Ascozdingly, ARPA Gxdor Flo. £3209, dated Bocembor 6,
. *. 4959, is horoby smcated to moto evatichle $104, $09; 008 unace .
. agpropristcn and cocemt eyzabal "9TESL13. 008 falarins and Ex.
goncea, Advanced Nossaech Projects fguney, Departencnt of
Byferss. " : .

"Tho dcarenes of $2, 769, 090 tn ths cmnonint athorice’d Grea
tis $164, 009, 659 rceussted tn tho Develoxrnent Finn hes boon ese
Piadasd to your ctafi. : :

co Te Devalogmont ond Funding Pion, dated Semory 36, 1959,
Pertaining to ths NSCCVERER srogran, ie being reviewod and *
epecific canmants relating tharoto will bo provided for Sarther

' ~pRogrem guidance. Lot .

eto gee ok



ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY
WASHINGTON 25, D.c.

ARPA Order No. 48-60
Amendment No. 7 -
Project Code No. 3100

October 8, 1955 DATE

TO: ‘The Secretary of the Air Force
Washington 25, D.C

ARPA Order No. 48, dated December 16, 1958, as amended ,
is hereby further amended to increase the fund availability by
$15,000,000 from $132,550,000 to a new total of $247, 550,000
under appropriation and account symbol "97X113.002 Salaries
and Expenses, Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department
of Defense." This funding provides for work during the month
of October 1959.

John E. Clark
Rear Adm., USN
Acting Director

Copy to: Commander, ARDC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          10,413
<SECURITIES>                                     3,557
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,369
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,059
<INVENTORY>                                     18,172
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,276
<PP&E>                                          30,932
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,952
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 147,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,148
<BONDS>                                          8,411
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           199
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,388
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   147,190
<SALES>                                         66,828
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,473
<CGS>                                           32,581
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,999
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 782
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,472
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,592
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,338
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,338
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.79
        

</TABLE>