alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 980/2006

of 29 June 2006         

fixing the export refunds on syrups and certain other sugar products exported in the natural state

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(1)(d), (f), (g) and (h) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001, exported in the natural state, shall be set out in the Annex hereto to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 30 June 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 June 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 6).

(2)OJ L 214, 8.9.1995, p. 16.

(3)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 63.

----

ANNEX

EXPORT REFUNDS ON SYRUPS AND CERTAIN OTHER SUGAR PRODUCTS EXPORTED WITHOUT FURTHER PROCESSING APPLICABLE FROM 30 JUNE 2006 (1)

----

(1)  The amounts set out in this Annex are not applicable with effect from 1 February 2005 pusrsuant to Council Decision 2005/45/EC of 22 December 2004 concerning the conclusion and the provisional application of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation amending the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 as regards the provisions applicable to processed agricultural products (OJ L 23, 26.1.2005, p. 17).

(1)  Applicable only to products referred to in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2135/95.

(2)  Applicable only to products referred to in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 2135/95.

(3)  The basic amount is not applicable to syrups which are less than 85 % pure (Regulation (EC) No 2135/95). Sucrose content is determined in accordance with Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 2135/95.

(4)  The basic amount is not applicable to the product defined under point 2 of the Annex to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3513/92 (OJ L 355, 5.12.1992, p. 12).

----
| 1.   | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September      30, 2009, is not in compliance with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the reasons discussed in      Note 1B of the financial statements;and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ending September 30, 2009 fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates      presented and the results of operations of the  Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ John X. Adiletta         |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| John      X. Adiletta        |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer |
| Chief      Financial Officer |   |
07/03/2012 10:04 FAX 2024935142 FAA -+ OMS ~001/002 

1"1 

ii 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

RECEIVED 

In the Matter of 

FREEDOM AIRLINES, INC. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) ___________________ ) 

JUN 2 9 2012 . 

June 28, 2012 HEARING DOCKET 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09SW0005 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS NO. FAA-2009-0980 

Judge: The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW REQUEST FOR A HEARING 

AND DISMISS THE PROCEEDING 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13.215, respondent Freedom Airlines, Inc. ("Freedom") 

hereby moves to withdraw the request for a hearing and to dismiss the proceeding. As 

part of the claims resolution process in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization of 

Freedom, Mesa Airlines, Inc., and Mesa Air Group, Inc., the Parties have reached a 

settlement of this matter, resulting in the resolution of ~h~ underlying claim in Issue in 

the Complaint. 

Accordingly, Freedom moves to withdraw the request for a hearing and to 

dismiss the proceeding. 

\\IJC O!l:IMti/000002. ~42211~v1 

Ch · he ~. Pappaioanou 

V.P. Legal Affairs 

Mesa Air Group, Inc. 

410 North 441

h Street, Suite 700 

Phoenix, AZ 85008 

TEL: 60Z·685-4000 

FAX: 602-685-4350 

·Respondent's Counsel 

1 
07/03/2012 10:05 FAX 2024835142 FAA + OMS ~ 002/002 

FAA Docket No. CP09SW0005 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

. SERVICE LIST 

I certify that June 28, 2012, I caused this Motion to Withdraw Request for a Hearing 

and Dismiss the Proceeding to be served on the following by the methods identified: 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1000 

(BY U.S. Mail) 

ONE COPY 

Annjenet Chennault, FAA Counsel 

Office of Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region, ASW-7E4, AC 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Blvd. 

Fort Worth, TX 76137 

TEL: (817) 222-5071 

FAX: (817) 222-5092/5946 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Office of Hearings, M·20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

(202) 366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

(BY U.S. MAIL AND FACSIMILE) 

ctk.qrir= 

\\DC· 023a66/00000~ • 34t~71~ vl 2
Opinion issued August 31, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 18 - 00172 - CV

——————————— ROYAL AC, INC. , Appella nt

V. DEBORAH GREEN , Appell e e On Appeal from the 295th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2017 - 09514

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Royal AC, Inc., has failed to timely file a brief. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file brief). Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal due to appellant’s failure to file a brief. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).2

More than ten days have elapsed since the filing of the motions. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 10.3(a). Appellant did not r espond , and a brief has not been filed. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX . R. A PP . P

. 42.3(b). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justice s Keyes, Bland, and Lloy d

.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Exhibit 12.1                         RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                                                  For the Years Ended December 31,
                                                                  -------------------------------
                                                              1994               1995               1996
                                                              ----               ----               ----
                                                                            (in thousands)
<S>                                                         <C>                <C>               <C>
Pretax income (loss) from continuing operations             $(1,674)           $(17,233)         $(87,986)

Less:  losses from less than 50% owned persons                  551               4,327             2,681
                                                            -------            --------          --------

                                                             (1,123)            (12,906)          (85,305)

Fixed charges
         Interest, whether expensed or capitalized               --                  30            20,298
         Amortization of debt expense                            --                  --                --
         Rental expense demonstrated to be interest              --                  --                --
         Preferred stock dividend requirements                   --                  --                --
                                                            -------            --------          --------
Total fixed charges                                               0                  30            20,298

Adjusted earnings                                            (1,123)            (12,876)          (65,007)
                                                            ========           =========         =========

Ratio of adjusted earnings to fixed charges                       --            (429.20)            (3.20)
                                                            ========           =========         =========

Note:  earnings are inadequate to cover fixed charges
         Amount of coverage deficiency                      $(1,123)           $(12,906)         $(85,305)
                                                            =========          ==========        =========

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. R. W. A. ROGERS.

*Bastardy*— Evidence—Judge’s *Charge.*

On the trial of an issue of bastardy, the Court below charged the jury that *“*the written examination of the woman was presumptive evidence that the defendant was the father of the child, and that if devolved on him by a preponderance of evidence to show that he was not; and that if taking all the evidence into consideration, both sides were evenly balanced, the State was entitled to a verdict;” *Held,*not to be error.

*(State*v. *Bennett,*75 N. C. 305, cited and approved.)

Proceeding in Bastardy beard at Spring Term, 1878, of UNION Superior Court, before Moore, *J.*

On the trial of the issue as to the paternity of the child, the examination of the mother .taken before the Justice was read to the jury, and the Solicitor then rested his case. Thereupon the defendant introduced himself and other witnesses to show that he was not the father; and to rebut this, the State introduced the mother and others to prove that he was the father of the bastard child.

The Court charged the jury that the written examination of the woman was presumptive evidence that defendant was the father of the child, and that it devolved on him by a preponderance of évidence to show that he was not; and that, if *“*taking all the evidence into consideration, both sides were evenly balanced, the State was entitled to a verdict.” To this instruction the defendant excepted; Verdict for the State. Judgment. Appeal by defendant.

*Attorney*General, for the State.

*Messrs. Covington Vann*and *W. II. Pace,*for the defendant.

Smith, C. J.

(After stating the case as above.) If the *610Judge in giving the instruction intended to tell the jury that taking the oral testimony delivered by the witnesses into consideration, if their minds were brought to an equipoise, and neither side preponderated, then the force and effect given by the statute to the written examination must turn the scale and give the State a verdict, the correctness of the charge will not admit of question ; and such we must suppose to have been the understanding of the jury. If, however, the Court meant that putting the written examination and testimony of witnesses together, and considering the entire evidence, if there was no preponderance either way, the verdict must be against defendant, the correctness of the charge would not be so clear. But even upon this construction of the charge, as some effect must be allowed the examination under the statute beyond its value as mere evidence, we are disposed to concur with the Judge, that it must prevail. *State*v. *Bennett,*75 N. C. 305. There is no error. This will be certified to the end that further proceedings may be had according to law.

No error. Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS



I, Kenneth W. Brimmer, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Sterion Incorporated;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





August 13, 2004

/s/ Kenneth W. Brimmer

Kenneth W. Brimmer

Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03120]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than March 3, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Nadine Wallman, Vice 
President) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. William Shanks, Versailles, Ohio, individually and The Shanks 
Family Control Group consisting of William Shanks, Margaret Shanks, 
Elizabeth Blevins, all of Versailles, Kentucky, and Willard Wickstrom, 
Louisville, Kentucky; to retain voting shares of Citizens Commerce 
Bancshares, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Citizens 
Commerce National Bank, both in Versailles, Kentucky.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Sally F. Duncan, Mt. Zion, Illinois, individually and as trustee 
of the Henry M. B. Wilson Irrevocable Trust, Henry M.B. Wilson, 
Sullivan, Illinois, individually and as beneficiary with the power to 
remove any trustee of the Henry M. B. Wilson Irrevocable Trust, and the 
Henry M. B. Wilson Irrevocable Trust, Sullivan, Illinois; individually 
and all of the foregoing as a group acting in concert to acquire voting 
shares of Sullivan Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire 
voting shares of First National Bank of Sullivan, both in Sullivan, 
Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 11, 
2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-03120 Filed 2-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
b.- ormitst' mrirr_faVI .roposied

MID donoitraing the t

t to he el*Nittititm of ‘the

-or the.fix Deverlop

tir the Oxocanittit also Oreatees rectdresest for

•

the ARPA start bas.' propceed detail! of the proposal hove of the ' Air :Pczree

-.tanttswi attire <A* thlo atilide by the,:rrojeat Per-

..reqwtait ' oiach a et4Stiy

tip*: On the 15th Of

ea to the

. or n OS in theLr

•

the ARPA saviest). should each be re- neva and project tiro-tag *Ailardvelp eettecauleat of

the stag. should. be to

oljeetaspte sualestaa,

4.01tw prOartes alms,08 davaiiitts a oted
V..
FIRST M & F CORPORATION

EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First M&F Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Hugh S. Potts, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|A. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of   Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                         
|B. | The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of the Company.

|Date:  November 8, 2006 |                                     
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------
|                        |                                     
|                        | /s/ Hugh S. Potts, Jr.              
|                        |                                     
|                        | Hugh S. Potts, Jr.                  
|                        | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

---
----

----

I Atti li l-pubblikazzjoni tagħhom hija obbligatorja

----

REGOLAMENT TAL-KUNSILL (KE) NRU 728/2006

tal-15 ta' Mejju 2006

li jissospendi u jirrevoka, taħt ċerti kondizzjonijiet, ir-Regolament (KE) Nru 2193/2003 li jistabbilixxi dazji addizzjonali tad-dwana fuq l-importazzjonijiet ta' ċerti prodotti li joriġinaw mill-Istati Uniti ta' l-Amerika

IL-KUNSILL TA' L-UNJONI EWROPEA,

Wara li kkunsidra t-Trattat li jistabbilixxi l-Komunità Ewropea, u l-aktar l-Artikolu 133 tiegħu,

Wara li kkunsidra l-proposta mill-Kummissjoni,

Billi:

ADOTTA DAN IR-REGOLAMENT:

Artikolu 1

1.   Is-sospensjoni ta' l-applikazzjoni ta' dazji addizzjonali previsti fl-Artikoli 1 u 2 tar-Regolament (KE) Nru 171/2005 hija b'dan estiża sad-29 ta' Mejju 2006.

2.   Fil-każ li l-President ta' l-Istati Uniti jiffirma l-Abbozz adottat mill-Kungress ta' l-Istati Uniti li jħassar id-dispożizzjonijiet eżentivi ta' l-Att FSC-ETI u ta' l-Att JOBS fis-26 ta' Mejju 2006 jew qabel, ir-Regolament (KE) Nru 2193/2003 għandu jitħassar b'effett mid-29 ta' Mejju 2006.

3.   Wara li ssir il-firma msemmija hawn fuq, il-Kummissjoni għandha minnufih tippubblika avviż fil-Ġurnal Uffiċjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea li tħabbar li tali firma tkun saret u li r-Regolament tal-Kunsill (KE) Nru 2193/2003 ġie mħassar b'effett mid-29 ta' Mejju 2006.

4.   Fil-każ li tali firma ma tkunx saret sas-26 ta' Mejju 2006, il-Kummissjoni għandha minnfih tippubblika avviż fil-Ġurnal Uffiċjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea li jħabbar li tali firma ma saritx u li l-kontro-miżuri previsti fir-Regolament (KE) Nru 2193/2003, kif emendat bir-Regolament tal-Kunsill (KE) Nru 171/2005, jerġgħu japplikaw mill-ġdid b'effett mit-30 ta' Mejju 2006.

Artikolu 2

Dan ir-Regolament għandu jidħol fis-seħħ fil-jum tal-pubblikazzjoni tiegħu fil-Ġurnal Uffiċjali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea.

Dan ir-Regolament għandu jorbot fl-intier tiegħu u japplika direttament fl-Istati Membri kollha.

Magħmul fi Brussel, nhar il- 15 ta' Mejju 2006.

Għall-Kunsill

Il-President

U. PLASSNIK

----

(1)ĠU L 328, 17.12.2003, p. 3. Regolament kif emendat bir-Regolament (KE) Nru 171/2005 (ĠU L 28, 12.2.2005, p. 31).

----
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 98-20832

Summary Calendar

SHANDA NUNU,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

DEL-LAGO ESTATES PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-97-CV-3723)

March 17, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts,

the reply brief and relevant portions of the record itself. For

the reasons stated by the magistrate judge in her Memorandum and

Recommendation filed under date of August 17, 1998, which was

adopted by the district judge pursuant to his Order filed under

date of September 3, 1998, we AFFIRM the Final Judgment that
2

plaintiff, Shanda Nunu, take nothing against the defendant, DelLago Estates Property Owners Association, and that this action be

dismissed with prejudice.

AFFIRMED.