alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2I, John R. Beaver, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sterling Chemicals, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:April 10, 2008       /s/ JOHN R. BEAVER         John R. Beaver    Senior Vice President — Finance and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 33 (Thursday, February 19, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03344]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; Short-term Educational Experiences in 
Hematology.
    Date: March 11, 2015.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda; One Bethesda Metro Center; 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue; Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Melissa E Nagelin, Ph.D.; Scientific Review 
Officer; Office of Scientific Review/DERA; National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute; 6701 Rockledge Drive; Room 7202; Bethesda, MD 
20892; 301-435-0297; [email protected].

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; International Strategic Timing of 
Antiretroviral Therapy.
    Date: March 13, 2015.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health; 6705 Rockledge Drive, Room 
7188; Bethesda, MD 20817; (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Chang Sook Kim, Ph.D.; Scientific Review 
Officer; Office of Scientific Review/DERA; National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute; 6701 Rockledge Drive; Room 7188; Bethesda, MD 
20892-7924; 301-435-0287; [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS).

    Dated: February 12, 2015.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-03344 Filed 2-18-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
#### In the Matter of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellant, v Colleen Dowling, Respondent.

[774 NYS2d 679]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Braun, J.), entered May 5, 2003, which denied petitioner insurer’s application to stay arbitration of respondent’s underinsured motorist claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The application to stay arbitration was properly denied on the ground that it was not made within 20 days after service of respondent’s demand (CPLR 7503 [c]). It does not avail petitioner that it timely commenced a proceeding to stay the arbitration in Queens County, which the Queens County court ordered transferred to New York County, and that it instituted the instant stay proceeding only because of ministerial difficulties it encountered in effectuating the transfer *(cf. Matter of Metropolitan Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. [Coping],*179 AD2d 499 [1992]). In any event, as the motion court also held, the petition lacks merit. Respondent notified petitioner insurer of the accident immediately after it happened, in connection with a no-fault claim. Neither at this time nor at any other time prior to the grant of summary judgment in the personal injury action *278respondent had brought, could she have known that the only-defendant in that action with significant insurance coverage, the driver of the car in which she was a passenger and also insured by petitioner, would be absolved of liability, and that she therefore had a viable underinsurance claim against petitioner. Under such circumstances, it was the grant of summary judgment to defendant in the personal injury action that marked the commencement of respondent’s obligation to give written notice of claim “as soon as practicable” *(see Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Sala,*226 AD2d 172 [1996], *lv denied*89 NY2d 801 [1996]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.
11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05115211 3D 

TOP SEGHEr 

Typed 25 Apr 63/me 

PUTT DU1ECTQa., N,t~O 

DHtECT.OR. 

DUtECTOR. PftCJGnPJMD 

hl ~ccordance 'with NllO dated 1$ 

det~r~'ni:na;tion has beJlllllmade too' assign l::lToje:ct 

01r<a:ctor ~ j?roirar.t~ D. 

s,. ':rhls project wiU ttu:r~ witbin tlMl i~Ur,flew nf the 

and be eon.sidertllld a eO'I$.rt;; el_.$t!;i~;o and comple: ely blaek actid:U:"I)u.ghout the eOr'ui~t~U." telit,. and j)peratb:n:~ pb.ues. 

Awar~nel5s thbi project wID b~ Oll the stri'Cte~t ~cd~itO""know bMi~. 

at 

All activi.ti&a perUdn.ing tOo thi~ j?roject irlll be cal'ried on 

w'hieh win al$o .e"~ as the priu~ o~!t'at:i~[lfM bu~w 

e~ , tilroup the ""'"" .... " ........ will 

cou;U.n~e to pl"ovide cnntract..ud $'ttPPOf't. 

Neces$;;IU,"'Y i~, will 

the CQ!flptro.tktr. 

e* S:upP':)rt pr~m.tNI tor ~12/H~12 

utU~d to thtft n:~axim1iu:n extent p.osaibl~ .. 

1'. .Project "b~terfae~ an.d/ol' Cl)Qx';Unation 

Ot~ 4i. couti£iuln~ baiiiS bet~ t~ Program 

lJeve1o.ptrltmlt Di·..risiOi~lI' ODI 

Distribution: 

Cyl DDNRO 

2 D/Prog n' 

3 Dr. Scoville for coord 

ldle via BYE 4 83-5 l.~irectol· 5 88-1 (SAFUS) 1tro! Svst~m ---..."pu - -- S8-1 (Col rviartin) JZ1 NatiO!lal "\'~'CO!~l~~ti$~~iUl(::~ 

'7 H/F ifl 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05115211 

I 

"'"
# NRO Leadership 

## Dr. Chris Scolese

### Director of the NRO

The NRO Director (DNRO) reports to the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence for all national space and assigned airborne reconnaissance activities. The DNRO provides management of the organization in accordance with Department of Defense and DNI requirements.
Read Biography

## Dr. Troy Meink

### Principal Deputy Director of the NRO

The Principal Deputy Director (PDDNRO) reports to and coordinates with the DNRO on all NRO activities. The PDDNRO provides day-to-day management of the NRO on responsibilities delegated by the DNRO and acts on his behalf on all matters in his absence.
Read Biography

## Maj. Gen. Chris Povak

### Deputy Director of the NRO

The Deputy Director (DDNRO) assists the Director and Principal Deputy Director in the day-to-day direction of the NRO and serves as the Commander of the Space Force Element at NRO.
Read Biography

## Chief MSgt. Kevin Ryan Jr.

### Senior Enlisted Leader of the NRO

The Senior Enlisted Leader (SEL) is the principal advisor to the DNRO and senior staff on matters relating to the welfare, quality of life, training, discipline, effective utilization, professional development, and force structure for the joint service enlisted members assigned to the NRO.
Read Biography

## A DECLASSIFIED HISTORY

The history of the NRO is a story of how opportunity, necessity, and determination converged to produce an intelligence organization unlike any that had come before.
Learn our History
#### The State ex rel. Carnahan, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Carnahan v. Indus. Comm.*(1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 67.]

(No. 97-177

Submitted April 13, 1999

Decided July 7, 1999.)

*68
      *Dean G. Reinhard Co., L.P.A.,*and *Charles Zamora,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Cheryl J. Nester,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

*69
      *Per Curiam.*

Claimant seeks two-thirds of the $440 weekly difference between his police and reservist wages. To prevail, he must prove a causal relationship between his injury and his decreased earnings. *State ex rel. Watts v. Schottenstein Stores Corp.*(1993), 68 Ohio St.3d 118, 623 N.E.2d 1202. The commission found no causal relationship, and we uphold that decision.

The commission rejected claimant’s assertion that his injury was responsible for his decreased wages. “Some evidence” supports that decision. Claimant’s injuries consisted of bruises that generated a single office visit. He lost no time from work and worked unimpeded as a police officer for the next two years. He also specifically declined a disability retirement. While Dr. Friedman indeed reported that claimant’s injury prevented a resumption of police duties, the commission was not required to accept that opinion. See *State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.*(1987), 31 Ohio St.3d 18, 31 OBR 70, 508 N.E.2d 936. Equally important, nothing in Dr. Friedman’s report confined claimant to part-time work as a reservist.

Claimant declared himself capable of full-time employment on his federal employment application. Given this ability, claimant was required to look for other employment beyond the federal realm. Claimant admittedly declined to search for county, city, or state employment and refused to look for work in the private sector. Claimant was clearly capable of a wide range of more lucrative work — he simply did not want it.

A claimant cannot successfully assert that an injury placed him/her at a competitive disadvantage in the job market without fully immersing himself/herself into the job market. *State ex rel. Ooten v. Siegel Interior Specialists Co.*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 255, 703 N.E.2d 306. This is to ensure that “claimant’s job choice was motivated by the injury-induced unavailability of other work and was not a lifestyle choice.” *Id.*at 257, 703 N.E.2d at 307. Here, the commission did not abuse its discretion in concluding that claimant’s departure from the police force and his subsequent part-time employment were motivated by lifestyle choice, not industrial injury.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### In re Guardianship of Krause, Alleged Incompetent: Krause, Alleged Incompetent, Appellant, vs. First Trust Company in Oshkosh, Guardian, and others, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Barber, Keefe, Patri & Horwits*of Oshkosh.

For the respondents : *Sigman & Sigmon*of Appleton, and *Bouck, Hilton, Kluwin & Dempsey*of Oshkosh.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
'''''' '' • '

45t NATIONAL NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHIN GTON. D.C•

THE NRO STAFF •

January 26, 1967

MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD

SUBJECT: TKH Briefing

On January 26, 1967 Mr. Gaud, the Director of the Age

for International Development (AID) was indoctrinated TKH an

briefed on the NRP by Mr. Reber. Parti • in the brief'

were Mr. Harry Murphy, CIA an

NRO Staff.

Mr. Reber introduced his briefing by explaining to Mr. Gaud

that Dr. Hornig had asked Mr. Helms to arrange for the indoctrination. Mr. Reber carefully explained that while Mr. Gaud had

been introduced previously to the existence of TKH material, he

understood from State control officers that Mr. Gaud's actual

exposure to such material had been minimal. Mr. Reber explained

than that this briefing would, in effect, constitute a reindoctrination.

Mr. Reber explained the significance of the briefing, relating

it to the programs recently proposed by Agriculture and Interior in

collaboration with NASA. He discussed early U-2 operations, moving

through current capabilities with satellites, emphasizing the vital

importance of the program as a most significant source of intelligence

collection for national defense.

Mr. Reber related the 1960 Presidential direction dealing with

protection of the product and the existing national policy on satellite

reconnaissance. He specifically addressed the recent NSAM 156

Committee review of the political and security aspects of non-military

applications of satellite earth-sensing and the reaffirmation of the

validity of existing national policy.
. Mr. Reber explained the nature of the NRP, it organizational

environment, and the functioning of the NRO.

Mr. Reber exemplified his briefing by showing. Mr. Gaud

several representative satellite photographic product boards.

He cautioned Mr. Gaud on the sensitivity of the information

presented and suggested the probability of Mr. Gaud's becoming

more closely involved as the joint NASA/Interior/Agriculture

proposed programs for earth resources surveys entered the

international development arena. Mr. Reber suggested that Mr.

Gaud refer any questions as to clearances or the possibility of

further discussions with cleared individuals to Mr. Denney or

Mr. Hughes, who could assist in such determinations.

Mr. Gaud was asked to acknowledge his acceptance of this

information by signing a statement prepared by Mr. Murphy.

Mr. Gaud was very attentive throughout the briefing, displaying both interest in and awe for the information being presented.

111111111 racateos •wo. alresalc •CS*40.14 . .

Co.,

C

 cones

Pasts
FIRST M
& F CORPORATION





EXHIBIT
32.1





SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATIONS





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of First M&F Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Hugh S. Potts, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





A.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





B.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
            August
      13, 2010





/s/ Hugh S. Potts, Jr.Hugh
      S. Potts, Jr.Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          14,846
<SECURITIES>                                     8,745
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,084
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,199
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,120
<PP&E>                                          12,925
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,992
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,223
<BONDS>                                             18
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            28
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,723
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,992
<SALES>                                         44,040
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,358
<CGS>                                            1,605
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,127
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                45,851
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,358
<INCOME-TAX>                                       535
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,823
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,823
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          957000
<SECURITIES>                                        00
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2543000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                   29438000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              35292000
<PP&E>                                        43231000
<DEPRECIATION>                                26257000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                53838000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         20445000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         91000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    31879000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  53838000
<SALES>                                      122726000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             122726000
<CGS>                                         81436000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 81436000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              41286000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (99000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 103000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     38000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              65000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     65000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.02
 
                   CONSENT OF KPMG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
The Board of Directors:
Exodus Communications, Inc.:
 
   We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-48273 and 33-72525) on Form S-8 of Exodus Communications, Inc. of our
report dated January 26, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Exodus Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1998,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' (deficit)
equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1998, and related schedule, which report appears in the December
31, 1998, Annual Report on Form 10-K of Exodus Communications, Inc.
 
                                          /s/ KPMG LLP
 
Mountain View, California
February 20, 1999