alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1290 

To ensure the ability of covered beneficiaries under the TRICARE program 

to access care under a health plan under such program in each 

TRICARE program region, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 12, 2015 

Mr. ROUNDS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To ensure the ability of covered beneficiaries under the 

TRICARE program to access care under a health plan 

under such program in each TRICARE program region, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TRICARE Portability 

5 Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PORTABILITY OF HEALTH PLANS UNDER THE 

7 TRICARE PROGRAM. 

8 (a) HEALTH PLAN PORTABILITY.— 


SSpencer on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1290 IS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense 

2 shall ensure that covered beneficiaries under the 

3 TRICARE program who are covered under a health 

4 plan under such program are able to seamlessly ac5 cess health care under such health plan in each 

6 TRICARE program region. 

7 (2) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 180 days 

8 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec9 retary shall prescribe regulations to carry out para10 graph (1). 

11 (b) MECHANISMS TO ENSURE PORTABILITY.—In 

12 carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary shall do the fol13 lowing: 

14 (1) Provide for the automatic electronic trans15 fer of demographic, enrollment, and claims informa16 tion between the contractors responsible for admin17 istering the TRICARE program in each TRICARE 

18 region when covered beneficiaries under the 

19 TRICARE program relocate between such regions. 

20 (2) Ensure such covered beneficiaries are able 

21 to obtain a new primary health care provider within 

22 ten days of undergoing such relocation. 

23 (3) Develop a process for such covered bene24 ficiaries to receive urgent care without 

25 preauthorization while undergoing such relocation. 


SSpencer on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1290 IS

1 (c) PUBLICATION.—The Secretary shall— 

2 (1) publish information on any modifications 

3 made pursuant to subsection (a) with respect to the 

4 ability of covered beneficiaries under the TRICARE 

5 program who are covered under a health plan under 

6 such program to access health care in each 

7 TRICARE region on the primary Internet website of 

8 the Department that is available to the public; and 

9 (2) ensure that such information is made avail10 able on the primary Internet website that is avail11 able to the public of each current contractor respon12 sible for administering the TRICARE program. 

13 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the terms ‘‘cov14 ered beneficiary’’ and ‘‘TRICARE program’’ have the 

15 meaning given such terms in section 1072 of title 10, 

16 United States Code. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 24.1



                                Power of Attorney

KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,  that each person whose signature appears below
constitutes and appoints Valerie L. Cover his attorney-in-fact,  with full power
of  substitution,  for him in any and all  capacities,  to sign the 1999  annual
report on Form 10-K of United  Australia/Pacific,  Inc., a Colorado  corporation
(the  "Company"),  to be filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the
"Commission"),  and all  amendments  thereto,  and to file  the  same,  with all
exhibits  thereto,  and  other  documents  in  connection  therewith,  with  the
Commission;  granting  unto said  attorney-in-fact  full power and  authority to
perform  any other act on behalf of the  undersigned  required to be done in the
premises,  whereby ratifying and confirming all that said  attorney-in-fact  may
lawfully do or cause to be done on behalf of the Company by virtue hereof.


By:  /S/ Gene W. Schneider
----------------------------------
Gene W. Schneider                                    March 27, 2000
Chairman of the Board



By:  /S/ Michael T. Fries
----------------------------------
Michael T. Fries                                     March 27, 2000
Director, President and
  Chief Executive Officer
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 5 April 2005

in Case T-376/03 Michel Hendrickx v Council of the European Union (1)

(Officials - Internal competition - Non-admission to oral tests - Requirement of specific knowledge of languages - Principle of equal treatment - Access to Council documents - Obligation to state grounds)

(2005/C 143/62)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-376/03: Michel Hendrickx, official of the Council of the European Union, residing in Brussels (Belgium), represented by J.-N. Louis, S. Orlandi, A. Coolen and E. Marchal, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against Council of the European Union (Agents: M. Sims and F. Anton) — application, first, for annulment of the decision of the Selection Board in competition Council/A/270 to award the applicant a disqualifying mark for written test A.3 and not to admit him to the oral tests and, second, for an order requiring the Council to pay token compensation of EUR 1 for non-material damage suffered — the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), composed of J.D. Cooke, President, R. Garcia-Valdecasas and I. Labucka, Judges; I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 5 April 2005, in which it:

----

(1)OJ C 21 of 24.1.2004.

----
Exhibit 24.1

                                Power of Attorney

KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,  that each person whose signature appears below
constitutes and appoints Valerie L. Cover his attorney-in-fact,  with full power
of  substitution,  for him in any and all  capacities,  to sign the 1998  annual
report on Form 10-K of UIH Australia/Pacific,  Inc., a Colorado corporation (the
"Company"),  to be filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the
"Commission"),  and all  amendments  thereto,  and to file  the  same,  with all
exhibits  thereto,  and  other  documents  in  connection  therewith,  with  the
Commission;  granting  unto said  attorney-in-fact  full power and  authority to
perform  any other act on behalf of the  undersigned  required to be done in the
premises,  whereby ratifying and confirming all that said  attorney-in-fact  may
lawfully do or cause to be done on behalf of the Company by virtue hereof.




/S/  Gene W. Schneider
-----------------------------------------
Gene W. Schneider                                    March 29, 1999
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer



/S/ Michael T. Fries
-----------------------------------------
Michael T. Fries                                     March 29, 1999
President and Director
. as

March 9, 1965

Proposed Boost Glide Devise is not inimmystem; rather a

new security category has been set up - ISINGLASS.

This temporary file has been set up and controlled in Dr. McMillan's

office at the present time.

Classification - 4EVES-60101)

Procedure: Handcarry to offices of Messrs. Vance & Fubini in

sealed envelope - request no receipt. Velma and

Phyllis to call when respective bosses have seen

correspondence and correspondence to be picked up

by Dr. McMillan's offi e.

No copies to go to

As of this date, following list furnished by Genatitrzames

those cleared in AF:

Dr. McMillan

General/10011W General

Col Worthman General

.",

Colonel

Lt Col

Mr.

Mr.

Maj

Col

Col Saunders

. • , i• •

•
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
     FROM GROUP LONG DISTANCE, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ENDED JULY
     31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                             JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                                     2,171,772
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                352,825
<ALLOWANCES>                                               (180,000)
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           2,436,297
<PP&E>                                                       135,125
<DEPRECIATION>                                             (130,446)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             3,603,036
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      1,064,426
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 2,538,610
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               3,603,036
<SALES>                                                    1,362,431
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           1,362,431
<CGS>                                                        685,114
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                685,114
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             309,360
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              41,443
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          (55,417)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              381,931
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 144,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          237,931
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 237,931
<EPS-BASIC>                                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0.06



</TABLE>
.16 

ea •

XI lama' 1955

tillarage L. Almon

Chief ingleser

loolcheed Aircraft Corporatism

Calltentle Mild=

Surbseicip Cellternis

Deer *aye .

Tammetthed isered.th an several asernefts, spesitioatlest

and dose ate provided by General Illgiringere He seingoomile

we see a liquid sawn system la air alrecetto I @wisest that pis

TIMM these papers end that vs tinaLine am the toe of awn

spina daring our next nestle& I lens meek annigegenie tor

Senna nicklawr to sesta* gas and soluniale Maine and lades-

*initials tor per pilots with high attitude mesas selles Knee

the UDC schedule is heave it as/ be necessary to aesonplish this

indoctrinations in tie !aeronauts.

For your

too tract driven

074286, are now

with raw original plans. Contitaation to

trannittod the letoneation regarding ripest for year tame

vouchers and vas intormed that the time soinduls of 4 Minh mill be

net; however I inland to toner this fullest wry elseely to see

that it Li asonsplielied en time.

him haw Jost finished an engine sthed gling meeting. The

schedule shwa beim is the best that ow amine seentaotarer as

provide. You will note that we have laccoseed spares to a Min

of 1.10 and we teel that lt will ;Amiably be nesessary to farther

increase this ratio to aceit, i &OWLS an We natter will be

made sametne in lioirch. It is intended to pncere tan additional

P.31 engines starting September l956. P-37 ohara gierisitos haw

been sontineed by nada" the engine at altitude in the envirennotal

oinntior„ The sobsdolo mils for 1 031 engine to be tested in the

oisember during Sarah of this gear. On pertemonas sheresteriatice

- • .'---111111111-

DX- /i 7

' • .4

• "•{,/,/ f „e•
of t1 AO9 . mass rog be slightly inpreted over the data that you

hare at the present Um, I as eobmitting this infornatlAn for

schemed planning =lb and hops to disooss the entire program with

you in the near Suture,

ma=

Ingins =wort

IYJJASOYD J P 1 Ajjggg

1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1

P-31 Delivery 2)5IP

Aaanszlalad itta

1 2, 3 7 8 9 13. 16 22 30 38 47 49 10

Additional product:1cm of P-31 to start September 1956.

Inas listed on

index

SEA mats° felt 00Coita.

27 Fels f..f-s"

Colonels
**EXHIBIT 11.1**

 

**DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP**

**EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES CALCULATION**

**(in thousands)**

 
|                                                                      |   | **Six Months  Ended June 30, 2003** |       |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|------------|
|                                                                      |   |                                |       |
| Net income from continuing operations less  dividends on preferred equity |   | $                                   | 77,002     |   |
| Dividends on preferred units                                              |   | 20,308                              |       |
| Loss/(gain) on land and depreciated  property sales                       |   | (11,146                             | )          |
| Interest expense                                                          |   | 67,377                              |       |
| Earnings before fixed charges                                             |   | $                                   | 153,541    |   |
|                                                                      |   |                                |       |
| Interest expense                                                          |   | $                                   | 67,377     |   |
| Dividends on preferred units                                              |   | 20,308                              |       |
| Interest costs capitalized                                                |   | 3,306                               |       |
| Total fixed charges                                                       |   | $                                   | 90,991     |   |
|                                                                      |   |                                |       |
| **Fixed charge ratio**                                                    |   | **1.69**                            | ** ** |

 

----
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16
- 4581

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. SHERWIN ANTWAIN CARTER, a/k/a Peetey Weeze , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Bruce H. Hendricks , District Judge. ( 4:15

- cr - 00095

- BHH

- 3 )

Submitted : June 30, 2017 Decided: July 18, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.
Affirmed in part ; dismissed in part by un published per curiam opinion

. Bradley M. Kirkland, BRADLEY M. KIRKLAND, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, Sou th Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Sherwin Antwain Carter pleaded guilty, pursuant to a Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement, to possession with intent to distribute cocaine bas e, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C) (2012). The parties agreed to a 96

- month term of imprisonment, and the district court accepted the plea and sentenced Carter accordingly. Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. Califo rnia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), questioning whether Carter was properly sentenced. Although notified of his right to do

so, Carter did not file a pro se supplemental brief, and the Government elected not to respond to the Anders brief. We affirm in part and d ismiss in part Generally, we review a defendant’s sentence “under a deferential abuse

- of

discretion standard.” Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 41 (2007). “However, not all sentences are subject to appellate review.” United States v. Williams , 811 F. 3d 621, 622

- 23 (4th Cir. 2016). In this case, we lack jurisdiction to review Carter’s sentence because it was imposed in accordance with the terms of his Rule 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement and was neither based on a Sentencing Guidelines range nor imposed in violation of law. See id. at 623

- 25

. In accordance with Anders , we have reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore dismiss Carter ’s challenge to his sentence of imprisonment and affirm the remai nder of the district court’s judgment

. This court requires that counsel inform Carter , in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Carter requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may3 move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Carter

. We dispe nse with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART
TO? Sr‘IFIET amI

111111111111111/

NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE'

wAsri.s.a.ro.. D.C.

21 AUG 1967

•

„et

COMM, 

TOP SF.CRET COPT

PASS • PIM

•

en• a. -:r.s: c at 6.68:•%;.

J011 311CC • . a . mon. ∎c• •p.,•

...—X1ORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, SURVEY

APPLICATIONS COORDINATING COMMITTEE

SUB.1ECT: NASA Work Statement

deference is made to my memorandum, "NASA Work Statement"

..:.':::-52555-67), dated 2 August 1967.

.--,: ;:artrnent of Defense members of the Survey Applications

Committee have reviewed the final version of the following docun-,mts included in NASA's "Statement of Work Covering an

Analysis of Spacecraft Systems with Physical Recovery Capability to

Perform Earth-Oriented Experiments":

SAL-JL-6667, 12 July 1967

SAL-JL-1, June 1967

c. SAL-JL-2, June 1967

Theso documents are compatible with the security guidelines

si in the charter of the Survey Applications Coordinating

This ......oraorandum should be attached :o the minutes of our next

: Ling.

o one , SAF

Member
----

 EXHIBIT 32.2

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of UltraGuard Water Systems Corp. (the "Company " ) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John R Gaetz,Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 Date: January 24, 2005

/s/ John R Gaetz                                    John R Gaetz   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-20-0000750

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

IN THE INTEREST OF LG

APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(FC-S NO. 20-00082)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEAL

(By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, Hiraoka and Nakasone, JJ.)

Upon consideration of Mother-Appellant AG's February 7,

2021 Motion to Withdraw Appeal, the papers in support, and the

record,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted and the

appeal is dismissed, under Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure

Rule 42(b).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, February 11, 2021.

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Presiding Judge

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka

Associate Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone

Associate Judge

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-20-0000750

11-FEB-2021

09:07 AM

Dkt. 34 OAWST
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7211

QUAMAINE LEE MASSEY,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DUSTIN GOINS,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Statesville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (5:19-cv-00030-MR)

Submitted: November 17, 2020 Decided: November 20, 2020

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Quamaine Lee Massey, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Quamaine Lee Massey appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Massey v. Goins, No. 

5:19-cv-00030-MR (W.D.N.C. June 30, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 7167

MICHAEL DWAYNE ROGERS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. CHRIS RICH; JUDGE BETTY BROWN , Defendants

- Appellees , and
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; ERIC HOOKS; WENDELL JACKSON , Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. William L. Osteen, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1:19

- cv - 00417

- WO

- JLW )

Submitted : February 29, 2024 Decided: March 22, 2024

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Michael Dwayne Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. James Trachtman, Assistant Attorney General, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for USCA4 Appeal: 22-7167 Doc: 14 Filed: 03/22/2024 Pg: 1 of 32 Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7167 Doc: 14 Filed: 03/22/2024 Pg: 2 of 33 PER CURIAM:
Michael D wayne Rogers, a North Carolina inmate, commenced this action alleging violations of his rights under the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc to
2000cc

- 5. On the magistrate judge’s recommendation, the district court granted summary judgment to Defendants Chris Rich and Betty Brown . Rogers appeals. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Although Rogers’ informal brief disputes the district court’s determination that Rogers’ right to practice his religion was not substantially burdened, the informal brief does not meaningfully challenge the court’s conclusion that the prison policies at issue
were the least restrictive means of furthering a compelling governmental interest

. See
Greenhill v. Clarke , 944 F.3d 243, 250 (4th Cir. 2019) (statin g elements of RLUIPA claim). As a result, Rogers has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”)

. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-7167 Doc: 14 Filed: 03/22/2024 Pg: 3 of 3