alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS OF THORATEC
LABORATORIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED APRIL 13, 1999.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                       2,369,166
<SECURITIES>                                 2,079,965
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,504,801
<ALLOWANCES>                                    45,698
<INVENTORY>                                  5,348,090
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,657,688
<PP&E>                                      12,672,246
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,029,996)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,309,245
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,858,001
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    72,845,977
<OTHER-SE>                                (51,462,604)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,309,245
<SALES>                                      5,375,473
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,545,749
<CGS>                                        2,347,598
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,347,598
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,533,763
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (335,612)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (335,612)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (335,612)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
From: Anderson, Wes [mailto:Wes.Anderson@ee.doe.gov] 

Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 10:56 AM 

To: Poston, Mona; Edwards, Brenda 

Cc: Parker, Graham B; Liu, Bing; gjrosenquist@lbl.gov; Somasundaram, Sriram; 

Winiarski, David W; Matthew Millard; Aris Marantan; Katie Coughlin; Williams, Grant D; 

Scott, Michael J 

Subject: Email to file for conversation with representatives from HARDI

Memo to file 

Docket ID EERE-2008-BT-STD-0006 

Rulemaking for Residential Central Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps 

From: Wes Anderson 

Ref: Conversation with Talbot H. Gee, Vice President of the Heating, Air-conditioning 

and Refrigeration Distributors International (HARDI) and Tom Roberts, President of 

CFM Distributors, Inc. 

The conversation was centered on opening a dialogue with the Department of Energy 

and HARDI. Talbot noted that they would be willing to share some aggregated data in 

reference to unit shipments. Tom pointed out that, in contrast to what would normally 

come from a manufacture, distributor’s information may be different. Tom also offered to 

allow DOE an in-depth inspection of how the Residential Central AC/HP’s distribution 

channel looks. They reiterated HARDI’s comments submitted during the comment period 

and are concerned that given the latest economic developments, too many changes in 

the regulatory arena will send shockwaves through their current business model. 

Wes Anderson

Mechanical Engineer

Building Technologies Program 

Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy 

U. S. Department of Energy 

202-586-7335

 EERE-2008-BT-STD-0006 COMMENT 44
*Wednesday, August 4, 1999*

MERIT DOCKET

98-2470.

#### State ex rel. Spangler v. WW Schaub Elec. Co.

Franklin App. No. 97APD08-1072. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnicic, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### Will of Huebner: Ehrlichman, Appellant, vs. Mason, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Samuel E. Gross*and *Lines, Spooner & Quarles,*attorneys, and *Leo Mann*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Houghton, Neelen & Houghton*and *Royden E. Webster,*all of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
DfliiTAN 

Irndle via BYEMAN Control System 

NRO,APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

SCK 

Redelegation of Procurement Authority 

Ainfia via ii;Eta 

Control System 

-Poz_ — B 

At, 

mounqpnourumm 

Deputy Director, Procurement and Pioduction, MOL 

1. Redelegable Procurement Authorities vested in the 

undersigned as are necessary to consumate the termination 

Jf close out of MOL DORIAN contracts are redelegated to 

Thomas W. Rutter within these limitations: 

a. Contractual modifications requiring execution 

by a procuring contracting officer which are essential to 

the termination activity, such as funding actions and 

administrative notices. 

b. Contractual correspondence requiring execution 

by a warranted individual. 

c. Contractual modifications and contractual 

correspondence essential to the close out of completed MOL 

contracts. 

2. The PCO warrant may be exercised without further review 

for new procurement actions up to $100,000.00. This letter 

conveys authority for approval of MOL action-by other PCO'a 

up to $500,000.00. 

3. This redalegation is void upon the completion of NUL 

activities at SAMSO. 

60 8 31?-49
#### Lyman, Respondent, vs. Village of Downing, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Dean & Dean*of Glenwood City.

For the respondent: *Spencer Haven*of Hudson.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .gov**
A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Search
Search

Search

-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Mission & Combat Support             
  -  Cybersecurity             
  -  Signals Intelligence             
  -  Central Security Service             
  -  Locations             
  -  Research             
  -  Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility             
  -  Cybersecurity Collaboration Center      -  Collaborative Partnerships             
    -  Enduring Security Framework             
    -  DIB Cybersecurity Services             
    -  Standards and Certifications             
    -  Artificial Intelligence Security Center 
-  Press Room    -  Press Releases & Statements             
  -  News & Highlights             
  -  Declassification & Transparency Initiatives             
  -  Cybersecurity Advisories & Guidance             
  -  Telework and Mobile Security Guidance             
  -  DoD Microelectronics Guidance             
  -  Research Publications 
-  Careers    -  Unique Pathways             
  -  Innovation 
-  History    -  National Cryptologic Museum             
  -  Cryptologic History             
  -  National Cryptologic Memorial 

HomeAboutLeadershipLeadership View
# C_2005069EN.01001201.xml

| 19.3.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/12

---

Action brought on 31 January 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-36/05)

(2005/C 69/22)

Language of the case: Spanish

An action against the Kingdom of Spain was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 31 January 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Ramón Vidal and Wouter Wils, of its Legal Service.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by exempting lending by almost all, if not all, categories of establishments from the obligation to pay a remuneration to authors for the public lending of works protected by copyright, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 1 and 5 of Council Directive 92/100/EEC of 19 November 1992 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property (1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by exempting lending by almost all, if not all, categories of establishments from the obligation to pay a remuneration to authors for the public lending of works protected by copyright, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 1 and 5 of Council Directive 92/100/EEC of 19 November 1992 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property (1);

1

| 2. | order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Article 1 of Directive 92/100/EEC imposes a duty on Member States to accord authors the exclusive right to authorise or prohibit the lending of his works. Article 5(1) of the Directive provides that the Member States may derogate from that exclusive right, provided that authors at least obtain a remuneration for unauthorised lending. In accordance with Article 5(3) of the Directive, Member States may ‘exempt’ from payment of that remuneration only ‘certain categories of establishments’.

Articles 17 and 19 of the Ley de Propriedad Intelectual (Law on Intellectual Property) (‘LPI’) recognise, in principle, the exclusive right of authors to authorise lending of their works. However, Article 37.2 of the LPI renders that right meaningless, by exempting practically every, if not all lending from the obligation to obtain the authors' prior authorisation and the obligation to pay a remuneration. On those grounds, the Commission takes the view that Article 37.2 of the LPI is contrary to the Kingdom of Spain's obligations under Articles 1, 5(1) and 5(3) of the Directive.

---

(1)  OJ L 346, de 27.11.1992, p. 61.

1

---
#### Thelma Hernandez, Appellant, v Sonia Rodriguez et al., Respondents.

[773 NYS2d 297]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.), entered August 22, 2002, which granted defendants’ motion for a change of venue from Bronx County to Suffolk County, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.

Flaintiff, a resident of Suffolk County, allegedly suffered an injury at the Suffolk County multiple dwelling owned by defendants. She commenced the instant action in Bronx County, where defendants reside. Defendants, after serving an answer and a demand for a change of venue, moved for change of venue based on the convenience of material witnesses. In support, defendants alleged that an action is properly venued in the forum where the cause of action arose and that the nonparties identified by plaintiff as witnesses, whose testimony defendants believed would be required at trial, all resided in Suffolk County. Defendants further noted that plaintiff’s treating physicians were also located in Suffolk County.

To obtain a discretionary change of venue under CPLR 510 (3), “the moving party must provide detailed justification for such relief in the form of the identity and availability of proposed witnesses, the nature and materiality of their anticipated testimony, and the manner in which they would be inconvenienced by the initial venue” *(Rodriguez v Port Auth.,*
      *270293 AD2d 325, 326 [2002], citing *Cardona v Aggressive Heating,*180 AD2d 572 [1992]; *Leopold v Goldstein,*283 AD2d 319 [2001]). A failure to establish the requisite contact with the witnesses results in the movant’s failure to satisfy its burden (Car*rozza v Galleria Mall,*292 AD2d 279 [2002]; *Brevetti v Roth,*114 AD2d 877 [1985]), as does the failure to establish their willingness to testify or the basis for their inconvenience *(Heinemann v Grunfeld,*224 AD2d 204 [1996]).

Here, no synopsis of the expected testimony was set forth and defendants did not establish that these witnesses were personally contacted and are available to testify. The need to travel from Suffolk County to the Bronx does not give rise to a presumption of inconvenience (see *Morrison v Lawler,*290 AD2d 370 *[2002]; Gluck v Pond House Farm,*271 AD2d 334 [2000]). As such, although the facts of this case might support a change of venue if the procedural requirements were satisfied, the facial deficiency of the motion papers requires that it be denied (see *Martinez v Dutchess Landaq,*301 AD2d 424 [2003]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Lerner, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

CFO CERTIFICATION



In connection with the annual report of Almaden Minerals Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),

I, Mark T. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/Mark T. Brown



Name: Mark T. Brown

Title: Chief Financial Officer

March 27, 2009

`
EXHIBIT
32(b)





Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C.
1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of MICROS Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q (“Form 10-Q”) for the three
month period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Cynthia A. Russo, Executive Vice President,
Finance, and Chief Financial Officer of MICROS Systems, Inc., certify that based
on my knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:  May
      6, 2010
              /s/ Cynthia A. RussoCynthia
      A. Russo
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 11 May 2006         

amending for the second time Decision 2005/648/EC concerning protection measures in relation to Newcastle disease in Bulgaria

(notified under document number C(2006) 1885)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/354/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC (1), and in particular Article 18(7) thereof,

Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries (2), and in particular Article 22(6) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Decision 2005/648/EC the Annex is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

Member States shall immediately take the necessary measures to comply with this Decision and publish those measures. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 May 2006.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 268, 24.9.1991, p. 56. Directive as last amended by the 2003 Act of Accession.

(2)OJ L 24, 30.1.1998, p. 9. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 165, 30.4.2004, p. 1).

(3)OJ L 238, 15.9.2005, p. 16. Decision as amended by Decision 2006/263/EC (OJ L 95, 4.4.2006, p. 3).

----

ANNEX

                     ‘ANNEX

Administrative district of Blagoevgrad

Administrative district of Burgas, excluding the municipalities of Burgas and Sungurlare

Administrative district of Vratsa’               

----
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74
38 39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲

▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 07/17 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jul 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PLAINS
RESOURCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1998,
AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          29,906
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,502
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     22,418
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,731
<PP&E>                                         612,835
<DEPRECIATION>                                 186,711
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 567,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           95,005
<BONDS>                                        332,232
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     20,983
<COMMON>                                         1,675
<OTHER-SE>                                     112,249
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   567,233
<SALES>                                        193,368
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               193,572
<CGS>                                          176,038
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  182,793
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,294
<INCOME-TAX>                                       863
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,431
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,431
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-2076

Lower Tribunal No. 22CF001616AOR

_____________________________

LINDA EDOUARD,

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County.

Mark. S. Blechman, Judge.

December 12, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

NARDELLA, SMITH and MIZE, JJ., concur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant 

Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. 

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
----

            COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 953/2006

of 19 June 2006         

amending Regulation (EC) No 1673/2000, as regards the processing aid for flax and hemp grown for fibre, and Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, as regards hemp eligible for the single payment scheme

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 37(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the Opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 1673/2000 is hereby amended as follows:

Article 2

Article 52 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 shall be replaced by the following:

‘Article 52

Production of hemp

1.   In case of production of hemp, the varieties used shall have a tetrahydrocannabinol content not exceeding 0,2 %. Member States shall establish a system for verifying the tetrahydrocannabinol content of the crops grown on at least 30 % of the areas on hemp. However, if a Member State introduces a system of prior approval for such cultivation, the minimum shall be 20 %.

2.   In accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 144(2), the granting of payments shall be made subject to the use of certified seeds of certain varieties.’

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply as of the date of entry into force, with the exception of Article 2 which shall apply from 1 January 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Luxembourg, 19 June 2006.

For the Council

The President

J. PRÖLL            

----

(1)  Not yet published in the Official Journal.

(2)OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 16. Regulation as last amended by the 2005 Act of Accession.

(3)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 319/2006 (OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 32).

----