alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 6272

SUPREME RAHEEM ACKBAR, a/k/a Ronald Gary

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

,

v.
WILLIAM R. BYERS, JR., Commissioner of the South Carolina Department of Corrections; WARDEN JOSEPH MCFADDEN; LIEUTEN ANT EUGENE SKIPPER; LIEUTENANT COOPER; SE RGEANT WILSON

,

Defendants

- Appellees

,

and

LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; SCDC; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

,

Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Richard Mark Gergel , District Judge. ( 4:17

- cv

- 01019

- RMG )

Submitted : June 20, 2018 Decided: June 27, 2018

Before KING and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Supreme Raheem Ackbar, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael DeAntonio, Christopher Thomas Dorsel, SENN LEGAL, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

Supreme Raheem Ackbar appeals the district court’s order accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting defendants’ motion to dismiss his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ackbar v.

Byers , No. 4:17

- cv

- 01019

- RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 6, 2018) . We dispense with oral a rgument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 6, 2020

No. 04-19-00778-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellant

v.

Vivian LAMPKIN,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 12, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 601339

Yolanda T. Huff, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On March 5, 2020, appellant filed a motion requesting an abatement of this appeal until 

the appellate record is adequately supplemented. Appellant states it timely requested findings of 

fact and conclusions of law after the trial court granted appellee’s motion to dismiss for violation 

of appellee’s right to speedy trial, but the trial court has not filed the requested findings and 

conclusions. See State v. Cullen, 195 S.W.3d 696, 698–99 (Tex. 2006) (requiring findings and 

conclusions to be recorded). Appellant also states that it requested the preparation of a reporter’s 

record of its October 16, 2019 verbal request for findings of fact and conclusions of law, but the 

court reporter has been unable to locate that record.

We GRANT appellant’s motion, abate the appeal, and remand the cause to the trial court. 

We ORDER the trial court to prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law and file them with 

the trial court clerk by APRIL 6, 2020. We further ORDER the trial court clerk to prepare and 

file a supplemental clerk’s record with this court containing the findings of fact and conclusions 

of law by APRIL 15, 2020. Finally, we ORDER court reporter Irene Maldonado to prepare and 

file by APRIL 6, 2020 either: (1) a reporter’s record of appellant’s October 16, 2019 verbal 

request for findings of fact and conclusions of law; or (2) written notice that the reporter’s record 

is lost.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of March, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
40FSECRET-

*NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

THE NRO STAFF

24 February 1977

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. BARFIELD, ODDR&E

SUBJECT: Technology Meeting Minutes

We have reviewed the draft of the meeting summary of

the Technology Committee Meeting held 9 December 1976.

The minutes accurately reflect the events of the meeting;

we do, however, have two modifying comments.

In paragraph 1. a. of the Action and Decision Summary,

we wish to point out that the technology revelation issue

is separate from •the data dissemination issue. This latter

item still needs to be resolved as a separate topic.

In the penultimate chart attached to the minutes, we

call attention to the anticipated 11 meter ground resolution

for the Metritek camera using type 3414 film. While we have

anticipated approval of a new policy permitting 10 meter

resolution in the civil community, the standing guideline is

presently 20 meters. Therefore, NASA should obtain approval

from the Special Coordinating Committee prior to making firm

plans to fly a camera with better than 20 meter ground

resolution capability.

Deputy Director for DOD

and Interagency Policy

01111111 cLassero ... Kugler PALMA

en 

Oki:MAL CNC

SON

CUIPl

Y ?# MCI A! WY ON IMP DLI

a OP rearTsots 

%CP...DULL Of

CA ff.--TOP-ifetElfr— CONTh M... 7 •

COPY OF C DF,

pnelr r,r 1 v•••:•
NRO APPROYD FO 

RELEAR 1 -JOLG Olig 

"4. 

*ASSISTANT SE:CRETAR' OF DEFENSE* 

WASH I hi GTO N, D.C. 20301 

• 

PUBLIC AFFAIRS" 

MEMORANDUM FOR •Honorable Alexander H. Flax 

Assistant Secretary of the Air' Force 

Research &.Development 

SUBJECT: Release of Technical Paprs .on•MOL 

The proposal to release carefully selected MOL technical papers 

':to scientific 'and. technical society meetings as set forth in yoUr 

memorandum of April 19 has been ".discussed with the State Depart-, 

!ment..and. USIA. .• 

?State feels the MOL is a potentially inflammable propaganda issue 

;.'in various U. N. forums. However, since it is no secret that 

the MOL is being developed, the general feeling of State is that 

:the adoption of an open, •business-as-usuali stance is much preferre 

ito assuming an elaborate air of secrecy. • 

USIA expects the MOL to be more of a liability than an asset as 

:far as the U.S. overseas information program is concerned. They, 

did not object to the highly ielective action you proposed.. ' . 

Limited public presentations aver." a period of time appear to be 

a favorable approach to disarm hostile propaganda should it arise. 

Release of information about the MOL, no matter how restrictive, 

will give rise to questions about the purpose of the program. All 

the value gained from this. exercise Would be lost if these questions 

are answered by .a "no comment". We, therefore, must have rea-

, sonably responsive guidelines 'for such questions.in order to proceed 

. with this proposal. 

I feel your proposal is sound;.-..nci I concur with its implementation on'- 

a highly selective, carefully controlled basis. I would like to reserve 

final judgment on these presentations on a case-by-case basis since 

time and place are often as important as the material released.,'. 

.......010.0.1011■ .10• ■1111.01..1.+00111.01.11.4 P.e.c? 

_TWNG11ADED AT 3 YEAR INTERVALS; 

DECLA.'.317.E1.) AFTER 12 YEARS. 

1 .)C D DIR 5200.10 

Goulding 

. Assistant Secretary or Detense 

. , 

Pubiio 4:fairs) 6nArriart9,7g 

U4Ril
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-15805, 333-45026, 333-62020, 333-106569 and
333-106570) of Aware, Inc. of our report dated March 14, 2007 relating to the
consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule, management's
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
this Form 10-K.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 14, 2007
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1217/2006

of 10 August 2006         

amending for the 68th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001 prohibiting the export of certain goods and services to Afghanistan, strengthening the flight ban and extending the freeze of funds and other financial resources in respect of the Taliban of Afghanistan (1), and in particular Article 7(1), first indent, thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 August 2006.

For the Commission

Eneko LANDÁBURU            

Director-General for External Relations

----

(1)OJ L 139, 29.5.2002, p. 9. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1210/2006 (OJ L 219, 10.8.2006, p. 14).

----

ANNEX

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended as follows:

The following entries shall be added under the heading ‘Natural persons’:

----
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 -sfeRFL Handle via Bt AN 

Control System 

ea 71 - X-19 

ti) 

AIR FORCE MOL POLICY COMMITTEE 

Highlight Summary 

of 

Agenda items for Meeting 65-4, November 30, 1965 

1111111 =MEMO 2. Manned vs Unmanned Report: A briefing will be presented which 

summarizes the recent PSAC guidance relative to manned and unmanned 

considerations for MOL. This guidance is interpreted as a desire 

by PSAC for a single MOL program having the manned and unmanned 

capability designed into it from inception as opposed to designing 

MOL for manned operations with subsequent conversion to an unmanned 

VIEW capability. The briefing will include the impact on that effort 

in the MOL program presently under way and on the work which must 

be undertaken to comply with the PSAC guidance. Highlighted will 

be detailed flight test objectives for each of all MOL flights sO 

necessary to support both manned and unmanned objectives, a discussion Air 

of the performance required from the components essential to automation) jr,""""" 

of the MOL optical systems, and impact on the basic MOL vehicle subsystems occasioned by the introduction of an unmanned configuration. 

1. Old Business: The previous meeting was devoted to: 

a. Status Report on the MOL Program 

b. MOL Astronaut Selection/Information Plan 

c. MOL Management Structure 

d. MOL Experiments Advisory Committee 

Actions taken since, and as a result of, that meeting include: 

public release of the names of the first group of MOL crew members 

and preliminary screening of the next group to be selected. 

Action pending: initiation of parallel development of a useful alternate payload to protect the 1968 launch date and action to establish 

the MOL Advisory Committee. 

Committee Action Requested: Consider guidance of PSAC as presented 

at this meeting. Direct those actions which must be taken as a result. 

DORIAN 

EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING; 

DOD DIR. 5200.10 DOES NOT APPLY 

BYE 36190-65 

Copy / of 9 

Handle via BYENAK 

Control
NRO Seeks Nominations for 2001 Pioneer 

Honorees 

October 5, 2000

The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) is seeking nominations for the 2001 class of NRO 

Pioneers. One to three people will be recognized by the organization as pioneers who made 

significant and lasting contributions to the discipline of national reconnaissance.

Forty-six pioneers were selected in the inaugural class this year by Mr. Keith Hall, NRO 

Director, based on recommendations from a special selection board. Those pioneers were 

recognized in a ceremony Sept. 27 at NRO headquarters where plaques were permanently 

displayed in their honor. 

Anyone may nominate an individual to be a candidate for selection, but nominations are due to 

the NRO by December 31. Nominees may be living or deceased and may include anyone except 

former NRO directors, deputy directors and program managers as they have already been 

honored by the organization. Pioneers will be chosen based on the significance and lasting effect 

of their contributions to national reconnaissance.

Nominations must be no longer than one page, single-spaced and should identify the contribution 

for which the individual is being nominated. Nominations should be mailed to:

Director, National Reconnaissance Office

Attn: Executive Secretary, Pioneer Selection Board

14675 Lee Road

Chantilly, VA 20151-1715

Nominations are no longer being accepted.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1182 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1182

   To exempt application of JSA attribution rule in case of existing 
                              agreements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2015

   Mr. Blunt (for himself, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Scott, and Ms. Mikulski) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
           Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To exempt application of JSA attribution rule in case of existing 
                              agreements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF APPLICATION OF JSA ATTRIBUTION RULE FOR 
              EXISTING AGREEMENTS.

    In the case of a party to a joint sales agreement (as defined in 
Note 2(k) to section 73.3555 of title 47, Code of Federal Regulations) 
that is in effect on the effective date of the amendment to Note 
2(k)(2) to such section made by the Further Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking and Report and Order adopted by the Commission on March 31, 
2014 (FCC 14-28), such party shall not be considered to be in violation 
of the ownership limitations of such section by reason of the 
application of the rule in such Note 2(k)(2) (as so amended) to the 
joint sales agreement.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 13, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-20204 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MORRIS HAUGHTON, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-115-ALL

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Morris Haughton appeals the district court’s revocation of his supervised release imposed following his convictions of possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine (Count 1) and being a felon in possession of a firearm (Count 2). As a result of the revocation, Haughton was sentenced to 12 months of imprisonment. Haughton argues that the district court lacked jurisdiction to revoke his supervised release because both of his supervised release terms had expired before the district court revoked them.No. 06-20204 -2- He contends that although 18 U.S.C. § 3583(i) allows for such a revocation as long as the warrant petition is issued before the supervised release term expires, § 3583(i) was enacted after he committed the offense in 1990 and cannot be applied retroactively to his case. Haughton does not challenge the revocation of his supervised release on any other ground. Haughton misstates the facts of his case. His five-year supervised release term for Count 1 does not expire until September 23, 2007, and thus it was still ongoing when the district court revoked his supervised release on January 3, 2006. Therefore, the issue whether the district court had jurisdiction under § 3583(i) to revoke Haughton’s supervised release is irrelevant and meritless.
AFFIRMED.
#### Torgerson (O. P.), Appellant, vs. Jensen, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Bull, Biart & Bieberstein*of Madison.

For the respondent: *Richmond, Jackman, Wilkie & Toebaas,*attorneys, and *Lawrence E. Hart*of counsel, all of Madison.

*By the Court.*

-Judgment affirmed.
--.-lrll 11"'11 ~,....ft!. ......... Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05112001 

I VI ULUiUL I 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

WASHINGTON 

HANDLE VIA B •· ,_ ' 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

111111111\1\1111\IIIII 111111111111111111 

OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY 30 December 1969 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 

SUBJECT: Discussion with Secretary Packard, 30 December 69 

Classified Subjects: 

I described the "H" review which we had conducted with 

BOB and how I felt this had served a good purpose in getting 

them off our backs. He thought that the thing had been well 

handled. 

On the Fubini Panel, he felt that it would be very 

satisfactory for them to slip their report to February or 

March. I told him that I would be willing for them to do 

that and in fact, I would be very happy if they slipped it 

to April or May but that I wasn~t sure that some other members 

of ExCom might not insist on getting a report out sooner. 

Specifically, they might ask us to call an ExCom meeting at 

which time we could explore what progress had been made, which 

could lead to an early decision on whether to speed up the 

read-out system. He says he does not think there would be 

any pressure from the other ExCom members and that we should 

go ahead and do the job the way we think is best. 

With resJect to the combining of the CIA and SAC U-2 

fleets, he said that Dick Helms had made a pitch to the President 

to keep the CIA fleet and was successful. However Packard said 

that as far as he is concerned it is a continuing i6sue and that 

we should go ahead and prepare our study of how to conduct the 

combination because he thinks it is very likely to happen in 

the not too distant future. 

HANDLE VIA B 

CONTROL SYsr·· 

TOP SECRET 

John L. McLucas 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05112001
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03312]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9036]


Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation Notice 
of Charter Renewal for 2015

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation 
is renewing its charter for a period of two years. This Advisory 
Committee will continue to make recommendations to the Historian and 
the Department of State on all aspects of the Department's program to 
publish the Foreign Relations of the United States series as well as on 
the Department's responsibility under statute (22 U.S.C. 4351, et seq.) 
to open its 30-year old and older records for public review at the 
National Archives and Records Administration. The Committee consists of 
nine members drawn from among historians, political scientists, 
archivists, international lawyers, and other social scientists who are 
distinguished in the field of U.S. foreign relations.
    Questions concerning the Committee and the renewal of its Charter 
should be directed to Stephen P. Randolph, Executive Secretary, 
Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation, Department 
of State, Office of the Historian, 2300 E Street NW., Washington, DC, 
20372 (Navy Potomac Annex), telephone (202) 955-0215 (email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d7bfbea4a3b8a5ae97a4a3b6a3b2f9b0b8a1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3e56574d4a514c477e4d4a5f4a5b10595148">[email protected]</span></a>).

    Dated: January 28, 2015.
Stephen P. Randolph,
Executive Secretary, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-03312 Filed 2-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.2


                        Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors
CNET, Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 of CNET, Inc. of our report dated January 21, 1997, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of CNET, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, which report appears
in the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-KSB of CNET, Inc.


                                            KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


San Francisco, California
March 31, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the Unaudited Statements of Operations and Accumulated
Deficit for the Three Months Ended March 31, 1999 and the
Unaudited Balance Sheet at March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                     181,374
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              428,377
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                142,371
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           754,162
<PP&E>                                     337,893
<DEPRECIATION>                             319,536
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             772,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       67,663
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                 10,000
<COMMON>                                   122,824
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               772,519
<SALES>                                    332,869
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           310,554
<CGS>                                      184,486
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              272,707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,312
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             35,535
<INCOME-TAX>                                31,035
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         31,035
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                31,035
<EPS-BASIC>                                 0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.00


</TABLE>