alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION
OF CEO PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I,
Duane Poliquin, President and Chief Executive Officer of Almaden Minerals Ltd.
(the “Company”) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:
 
 1.
    This
      Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended December
      31, 2004, as filed withthe
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the “report”), fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
 
 2.
    The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 Date: March
28, 2005
 
 
 Signed: /s/Duane
Poliquin
### NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-7091 ROBERT F. MALONEY

Claimant-Appellant,

v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

in 05-2383, Judge Bruce E. Kasold. Before BRYSON 

### Circuit Judge. ORDER Upon review of this recently docketed appeal, the court considers whether Robert F. Maloney should be directed to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed as untimely filed. The United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims entered judgment in this case on February 9, 2009. The docket sheet of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims indicates that that court received Maloney's notice of appeal on April 24, 2009, or 74 days after entry of judgment. Any appeal of the judgment had to be received by the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims within 60 days of the date of entry of judgment. 38 U.S.C. § 7292(a); 28 U.S.C. § 2107(b); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). If the notice of appeal was untimely filed, we do not have jurisdiction and this appeal must be dismissed. See 

### Bowles v. Russell,
551 U.S. , 127 S.Ct. 2360 (2007) (the timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil caseis a jurisdictional requirement) • Sofarelli Assoc., Inc. v. United States, 716 F.2d 1395

(Fed. Cir. 1983). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Maloney is directed to show cause, within 21 days of the date of filing of this order, why his appeal should not be dismissed as untimely filed.

The briefing schedule is stayed. FOR THE COURT



## JUN 11 

# 2009 Date /s/ Jan Horbalv Jan Horbaly Clerk U.S. COURT tglp EA LS FOR THE FED L CIRCUIT
cc: Robert F. Maloney Robert C. Bigler, Esq. JUN 1 1 2009
s20 ithcoriu CLERK

2009-7091 - 2 -
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 19

- 00144

- CV

Maegen Jeanine Fletcher, Appellant

v.

Pingora Loan Servicing, LLC, Its Successors and Assigns, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COUR T AT LAW NO. 1 OF WI LLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 18

- 1385

- CC1, T HE HONORABLE BRANDY HALLFORD, JUDGE PRES IDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The part i es have filed an agreed joint moti on to dismiss this appeal. The parties

have request ed that this Court ( 1 ) vacat e the trial court ’ s judgment and dismiss the c ause without

prejudice ; ( 2 ) req uir e the releas e of all supersedeas funds

, including interest, if any, t o Maegen

Jeanine Fletcher; and (3 ) tax the costs of appeal against the p arty incurring them . The parties

have also agr e ed that the mandate may issue ea r ly as allowed under Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 18.1(c).

We g rant the motion . W e vacate the Williamson County Court’s judgment and

dismiss the cause without pre jud ice

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a) (2)( A); id. R. 43.2(e) (allowing

court of appeals to vacate trial court’s judgment and dismiss case)

.2 __________________________________________ Thomas J. Baker, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Triana

Dismissed on Joint Motion

Filed: March 11, 2020
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1426 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1426

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the participation 
   of physical therapists in the National Health Service Corps Loan 
               Repayment Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2015

Mr. Tester (for himself and Mr. Wicker) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the participation 
   of physical therapists in the National Health Service Corps Loan 
               Repayment Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Physical Therapist Workforce and 
Patient Access Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE CORPS; PARTICIPATION OF PHYSICAL 
              THERAPISTS IN LOAN REPAYMENT PROGRAM.

    (a) Mission of Corps; Definition of Primary Health Services.--
Section 331(a)(3)(D) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
254d(a)(3)(D)) is amended by striking ``or mental health,'' and 
inserting ``mental health, or physical therapy,''.
    (b) Loan Repayment Program.--Section 338B of the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254l-1) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``and physician 
        assistants;'' and inserting ``physician assistants, and 
        physical therapists;''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(1)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting before the 
                semicolon the following: ``, or have a doctoral or 
                master's degree in physical therapy'';
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ``physical 
                therapy,'' after ``mental health,''; and
                    (C) in subparagraph (C)(ii), by inserting 
                ``physical therapy,'' after ``dentistry,''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2004320EN.01002701.xml

| 24.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/27

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3617 — BC PARTNERS/PICARD)

(2004/C 320/15)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 25 November 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3617. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3617. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report Creative  Eateries  Corp(the  "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December  31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Frank  J.
Holdraker,  the President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1)   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Date: May 10, 2006                      /s/ Scott Campbell
                                        -------------------------------
                                        Scott Campbell
                                        Vice President Finance
. . :

, 4,1

F'..'1!1•N'.

. • •

•

. •

•
• . 4

•

,• •

•

- ,•

g• • • -•

" I.....

•
. .

i.•‘••••:.":;- •• • • •::

*•,Y *.

•

. • '

4

C:: •

i 5' 5:

. .

.•-• •

'•:-i.- ...: -','-‘,... 7'. .• ' . ..: • * • -v": -•-' 4* '.: ;•. '..."."5,j.'' '

.'..2•;gr!...:*'-i,12.%.' ...::;;, i'•' ••' •

. • 7.

1.' ) •,t1:-• •• .*.;y t: '...*;0..,. .. :?••`•• ..71"?....

.... ;:n••*'.. '"? A'''.

.,:, . . .. .

t

; .... : •.•,1*". / " 't • 4, *

4j

"":

t••••

s 'itn

T.44P.

•••.,
•

• • %la'

.41644101014:

.• 4%.

•,‘ -;"-•. • •

•• •.r„;,.. • k: • .

'-'••••••••. 7.

•••••

,.! • .

Yr".. 4i, :./4t.. •

-* ,
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1170 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of the 

United States Postal Service to issue a semipostal to raise funds for 

breast cancer research, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 30, 2015 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself and Mr. ENZI) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of the United States Postal Service to issue a 

semipostal to raise funds for breast cancer research, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Breast Cancer Re5 search Stamp Reauthorization Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1170 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF POSTAGE STAMP FOR BREAST CAN2 CER RESEARCH. 

3 Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is 

4 amended by striking ‘‘2015’’ and inserting ‘‘2019’’. 

5 SEC. 3. ENSURING THAT FUNDS GENERATED BY SPECIAL 

6 POSTAGE STAMP SALES ARE USED FOR 

7 BREAST CANCER RESEARCH. 

8 Section 414(c)(1) of title 39, United States Code, is 

9 amended in the matter following subparagraph (B) by 

10 adding at the end the following: ‘‘An agency that receives 

11 amounts from the Postal Service under this paragraph 

12 shall use the amounts for breast cancer research.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of BioScrip, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hai Tran, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: June 6, 2014





/s/ Hai Tran


Hai Tran,


Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer


and Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 11.1

 

**COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE**

 

 
| BEGINNING BALANCE  |          | 17,883,015       |
|--------------------|---------------|------------------|
|               |          |             |   |
|               | NO. OF SHARES | CONTRIBUTION TO  | ENDING |
| DATE               | ISSUED        | WEIGHTED AVERAGE | BALANCE |
|               |          |             |   |   |
| February 6, 2004   | 12,000        |             | 11,211 |   | 17,894,226 |   |
| February 13, 2004  | 15,000        |             | 13,233 |   | 17,907,459 |   |
| March 30, 2004     | 10,000        |             | 7,562 |   | 17,915,021 |   |
| March 31, 2004     | 10,000        |             | 7,534 |   | 17,922,555 |   |
| April 15, 2004     | 521,588       |             | 371,542 |   | 18,294,097 |   |
| May 27, 2004       | 113,000       |             | 67,490 |   | 18,361,587 |   |
| Jun 28, 2004       | 10,000        |             | 5,096 |   | 18,366,683 |   |
| September 10, 2004 | 258,404       |             | 79,291 |   | 18,445,974 |   |
| September 24, 2004 | 100,000       |             | 26,849 |   | 18,472,823 |   |
| October 28, 2004   | 20,000        |             | 3,507 |   | 18,476,330 |   |
| December 1, 2004   | 395,000       |             | 32,466 |   | 18,508,796 |   |
| December 21, 2004  | 196,250       |             | 5,376 |   | 18,514,172 |   |
| December 29, 2004  | 450,000       |             | 2,466 |   | 18,516,638 |   |

 

 
| Net Loss for the year   | $2,860,269 |
|-------------------------|------------|
| Weighted average shares | 18,516,638 |
| Net Loss per share      | $(0.15)    |
Exhibit 23.1




                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                    -----------------------------------------


As independent  public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the  incorporation by
reference of our reports dated March 29, 2000 (except with respect to the matter
discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated  financial  statements,  as to which the
date  is  August  14,  2000)  on  United  Australia/Pacific,  Inc.  (f/k/a/  UIH
Australia/Pacific,  Inc.)  included in this Annual  Report on Form 10-K/A No. 1,
into previously filed Registration Statement File No. 333-37651.


                                           ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Denver, Colorado
March 29, 2000  (except with respect
  to the matter  discussed in Note 2
  to   the  consolidated   financial
  statements,  as to which  the date
  is August 14, 2000).
<PAGE>   1



                                                                   Exhibit 20.2



                             SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                      MELLON BANK (DE) NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

                      MELLON BANK CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST

                  The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Mellon
Bank (DE) National Association, as Servicer ("Mellon Bank (DE)"), pursuant to
Section 3.5 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 1995
(as may be amended and supplemented from time to time, the "Agreement"), among
Mellon Bank (DE), as Transferor and Servicer, and The Bank of New York, as
Trustee, does hereby certify that:

         1.       Mellon Bank (DE) is, as of the date hereof, Servicer under the
                  Agreement. Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have
                  their respective meanings as set forth in the Agreement.

         2.       The undersigned is a Servicing Officer who is duly authorized
                  pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this
                  Certificate to Trustee.

         3.       A review of the activities of Servicer during the fiscal year
                  ended December 31, 1997, and of its performance under the
                  Agreement was conducted under my supervision.

         4.       Based on such review, Servicer has, to the best of my
                  knowledge, performed in all material respects its obligations
                  under the Agreement throughout such year and no default in the
                  performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this 
Certificate this 24th day of March, 1998.



                                      MELLON BANK (DE) NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
                                        Servicer



                                      By  /s/ John L. Klinck, Jr.
                                         ---------------------------------
                                           Name:  John L. Klinck, Jr.
                                           Title: Senior Vice President
**
**Exhibit 13.1**

**Certification**

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 ofTitle 18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of SK Telecom Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,that: 

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Form 20-F”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. 

 
Dated: April 27, 2018  
/s/ Jung Ho Park
  **Jung Ho Park**  **President and Chief Executive Officer**
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 
**
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0882 Directorate Identifier: 2013-NE-29-AD 

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action 

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement) 

Do not include oncondition costs here 

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours 

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up) 

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our) 

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts) 

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet 

BR700 FMU 

replacement 6.0 $ 510.00 $293,960 $294,470.00 24 $7,067,280.0

0

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $7,067,280 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs:

Action 

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement) 

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup) 

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour) 

Parts Cost Cost per Product 

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): ASE Estimate 

based on COS database and OEM FMU cost
Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
ALA waquiaari.mr.ma

1111. 1111111111111

. *NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C. •

STAR 19 April 1973

MEMORANDUM FOR MR.

SUBJECT: Overseas

(OPIC's)

•

•

JOHN HUGHES, DIA-DC

Processing and Interpretat

F-1

•

.1...i 1- II

. 1 

ion Centers,---i-i-ji

The original concept of the OPIC's dates back almost a

decade and from a period in time when this country was

lacking in processing support. Since that time both the

National and DoD elements have vastly improved. Today we

continue to maintain OPIC-A and E, but have never really

tasked them recently to provide a service which they were

originally intended to perform.

1

. Sin inception of OPIC-E, only one National mission

has been flown in that area of the world and

as processed back here in the CONUS. The high

volume of processing accomplished at OPIC-A was a direct

result of our involvement in SEA and could have been accomplished (and in reality was) by the 548th RTG.

1

Our National involvement with the OPIC's recentl has

been one of disappointment and concern. had

numerous difficulties in the processing p e ed

OPIC-E. OPIC-A has experienced difficulties wit

There is no intention to place blame on either OPIC. It

is a simple fact that to process imagery at NRO standards

requires almost continuous exercise with the various films

and chemistries associated with the effort. A constant update in both techniques and equipment is necessary and the

recent decision to exercise the OPIC's semi-annually can only

ahem to oint out our problems.

JA GEM :CH

SODOM Of eXCUInn occa 11•12 11XDAMON CAnCOrf 0 Sa CI. 0 Al r 14)

AUTOMMICAUT OMASSIPIO ON

irilowsee 

iptAtIVI" ow owe. n1 seri

WARNING NOTICE — SENSITIVE .

INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND

METHODS INVOLVED
It is felt that the Air Force can adequately manage and

support the effort which is presently justified as an OPIC.

During times of crisis or special missions, the NRO would

continue to lend support in the way of logistics and contractor expertise if required.

As the executive for the NRO in matters dealing with the

OPIC's, request you investigate the continuing need of this

film processing concept and make appropriate recommendations by

1 June 1973 for their termination or postulate a revised

concept with adequate justification.

Colonel, USAF

Director

D LIST

Mgr •

sti 2 . .6. 2