Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 25 / Friday, February 6, 2015 / Notices 6689 

1See Initiation of Five year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 78 

FR 60253 (October 1, 2013). 

2See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and 

Strip From Brazil, the People’s Republic of China, 

and the United Arab Emirates: Final Results of the 

Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty 

Orders, 79 FR 10095, (February 24, 2014). 

3See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 

Strip from Brazil, China, and the United Arab 

Emirates, 80 FR 3623 (January 23, 2015). On the 

same day, the ITC also determined that revocation 

of the antidumping orders of PET Film from the 

PRC and the UAE would lead to a continuation or 

recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 

United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. 

4See Notice of Scope Rulings, 75 FR 38081 (July 

1, 2010). 

ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF

VOTING AGE FOR EACH STATE AND

THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: JULY 1, 

2014—Continued 

Area Population 18 

and over 

Arizona .................................. 5,109,792 

Arkansas ............................... 2,259,350 

California ............................... 29,649,348 

Colorado ............................... 4,109,494 

Connecticut ........................... 2,821,247 

Delaware ............................... 731,367 

District of Columbia .............. 543,588 

Florida ................................... 15,839,713 

Georgia ................................. 7,604,061 

Hawaii ................................... 1,111,117 

Idaho ..................................... 1,203,384 

Illinois .................................... 9,892,106 

Indiana .................................. 5,014,928 

Iowa ...................................... 2,381,172 

Kansas .................................. 2,181,355 

Kentucky ............................... 3,400,843 

Louisiana .............................. 3,536,183 

Maine .................................... 1,071,112 

Maryland ............................... 4,625,863 

Massachusetts ...................... 5,354,940 

Michigan ............................... 7,686,087 

Minnesota ............................. 4,175,347 

Mississippi ............................ 2,262,810 

Missouri ................................ 4,670,966 

Montana ................................ 798,555 

Nebraska .............................. 1,414,894 

Nevada ................................. 2,175,874 

New Hampshire .................... 1,059,672 

New Jersey ........................... 6,926,094 

New Mexico .......................... 1,583,623 

New York .............................. 15,517,321 

North Carolina ...................... 7,656,415 

North Dakota ........................ 570,955 

Ohio ...................................... 8,955,859 

Oklahoma ............................. 2,925,352 

Oregon .................................. 3,112,217 

Pennsylvania ........................ 10,086,316 

Rhode Island ........................ 842,321 

South Carolina ...................... 3,747,734 

South Dakota ........................ 642,768 

Tennessee ............................ 5,054,826 

Texas .................................... 19,841,344 

Utah ...................................... 2,038,787 

Vermont ................................ 504,976 

Virginia .................................. 6,457,174 

Washington ........................... 5,458,809 

West Virginia ........................ 1,470,179 

Wisconsin ............................. 4,457,375 

Wyoming ............................... 445,830 

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, Vintage 2014 Population Estimates. 

I have certified these estimates for the 

Federal Election Commission. 

Dated: January 29, 2015. 

Penny Pritzker, 

Secretary of Commerce. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02473 Filed 2–5–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–07–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–351–841, A–520–803, A–570–924] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet, and Strip From Brazil, the 

People’s Republic of China, and the 

United Arab Emirates: Continuation 

and Revocation of Antidumping Duty 

Orders 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of the 

determinations by the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) and the 

International Trade Commission (the 

ITC) in their five year (sunset) reviews 

that revocation of the antidumping duty 

(AD) order on polyethylene 

terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET 

Film) from the People’s Republic of 

China (PRC) and the United Arab 

Emirates (UAE) would likely lead to a 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

and material injury to an industry in the 

United States, the Department is 

publishing a notice of continuation for 

these antidumping duty orders. As a 

result of the ITC’s determination that 

revocation of the AD order on PET Film 

from Brazil is not likely to lead to the 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States, the Department is revoking this 

AD order. 

DATES: Effective Date: AD Brazil 

Revocation: November 10, 2013; AD 

PRC and UAE Continuation: February 6, 

2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jacqueline Arrowsmith, Office VII, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–5255. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 1, 2013, the Department 

initiated the sunset reviews on the AD 

orders on PET film from Brazil, the PRC, 

and the UAE pursuant to section 751(c) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act).1 As a result of the reviews, the 

Department found that revocation of the 

AD orders on PET Film from Brazil, the 

PRC, and the UAE would likely to lead 

to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping, and notified the ITC of the 

margins of dumping likely to prevail 

should the order be revoked.2

On January 23, 2015, the ITC 

published its determination, pursuant to 

section 751(c)(1) and section 752(a) of 

the Act, that revocation of the AD order 

on PET Film the PRC and the UAE 

would be likely to lead to the 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury within a reasonably foreseeable 

time, but that revocation of the AD order 

on PET Film from Brazil would not be 

likely to do so.3

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by this order 

are all gauges of raw, pre-treated, or 

primed PET film, whether extruded or 

co-extruded. Excluded are metallized 

films and other finished films that have 

had at least one of their surfaces 

modified by the application of a 

performance-enhancing resinous or 

inorganic layer more than 0.00001 

inches thick. Also excluded is roller 

transport cleaning film which has at 

least one of its surfaces modified by 

application of 0.5 micrometers of SBR 

latex. Tracing and drafting film is also 

excluded. PET film is classifiable under 

subheading 3920.62.0090 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). While HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, our 

written description of the scope of the 

order is dispositive. 

Scope Determinations on PET Film 

From the PRC 

Since these orders were published, 

there was one scope determination for 

PET film from the PRC, with notice of 

the decision published on July 1, 2010. 

In this determination, requested by 

Coated Fabrics Company, the 

Department determined that 

Amorphous PET (‘‘APET’’), Glycolmodified PET (‘‘PETG’’), and 

coextruded APET with PETG on its 

outer surfaces (‘‘GAG Sheet’’), are 

within the scope of the antidumping 

duty order of PET Film from the PRC.4


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
6690 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 25 / Friday, February 6, 2015 / Notices 

5See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 

Strip From Brazil, the People’s Republic of China 

and the United Arab Emirates: Antidumping Duty 

Orders and Amended Final Determination of Sales 

at Less Than Fair Value for United Arab Emirates, 

73 FR 66595 (November 10, 2008). 

1See Notice of Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping 

Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the 

People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, 

2005) (‘‘Order’’). 

2See Submission from Elements, ‘‘Wooden 

Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of 

China: Request for a Changed Circumstance Review 

Regarding Shoe Cabinets,’’ dated June 2, 2014 

(‘‘Elements’ Request’’). 3See Submission from Petitioners, ‘‘Wooden 

Bedroom Furniture From The People’s Republic of 

China/Petitioners’ Response to Elements’ Letter of 

June 2, 2014,’’ dated June 3, 2014. 4See Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of Initiation of 

Changed Circumstances Review, and Consideration 

of Revocation of the Antidumping Duty Order in 

Part, 79 FR 41260 (July 15, 2014) (‘‘Initiation 

Notice’’) 5 Id. at 41262. 

Continuation of the Order on PET Film 

From the PRC and the UAE 

As a result of the determinations by 

the Department and the ITC that 

revocation of these antidumping duty 

orders would likely lead to a 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

and material injury to an industry in the 

United States, pursuant to sections 

751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act, the 

Department hereby orders the 

continuation of the AD order on PET 

Film from the PRC and the UAE. U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

will continue to collect antidumping 

duty cash deposits at the rates in effect 

at the time of entry for all imports of 

subject merchandise. 

The effective date of the continuation 

of this order will be the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this notice of continuation. Pursuant to 

section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the 

Department intends to initiate the next 

five-year review of this order not later 

than 30 days prior to the fifth 

anniversary of the effective date of 

continuation. 

Revocation of the Order on PET Film 

From Brazil 

As a result of the determination by the 

ITC that revocation of this AD order is 

not likely to lead to the continuation or 

recurrence of material injury to an 

industry in the United States, the 

Department is revoking the AD order on 

PET Film from Brazil. Pursuant to 

section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.222(i)(2)(i), the effective date of 

revocation is November 10, 2013 (i.e., 

the fifth anniversary of the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

the order 5). 

Cash Deposit and Assessment of Duties 

on PET Film From Brazil 

The Department will notify U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP), 

15 days after the publication of this 

notice, to terminate the suspension of 

liquidation and to discontinue the 

collection of cash deposits on entries of 

PET Film from Brazil, entered or 

withdrawn from warehouse, on or after 

November 10, 2013. The Department 

will further instruct CBP to refund with 

interest all cash deposits on entries 

made on or after November 10, 2013. 

Entries of subject merchandise prior to 

the effective date of revocation will 

continue to be subject to suspension of 

liquidation and AD deposit 

requirements and assessments. The 

Department will complete any pending 

or requested administrative reviews of 

the order on PET Film from Brazil 

covering entries prior to November 10, 

2013. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return/destruction or conversion to 

judicial protective order of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). 

Failure to comply is a violation of the 

APO which, may be subject to 

sanctions. 

This five-year (sunset) review and 

notice are in accordance with sections 

751(c) and 751(d)(2), and 777(i) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). 

Dated: January 30, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02456 Filed 2–5–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–890] 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the 

People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review, and Intent To 

Revoke Antidumping Duty Order in 

Part 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On June 2, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

‘‘Department’’) received a request for 

revocation, in part, of the antidumping 

duty (‘‘AD’’) order on wooden bedroom 

furniture from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’) 1 with respect to certain 

shoe cabinets. We preliminarily 

determine that the producers accounting 

for substantially all of the production of 

the domestic like product to which the 

Order pertains lack interest in the relief 

provided by the Order with respect to 

certain shoe cabinets described below. 

Accordingly, we intend to revoke, in 

part, the Order as to imports of certain 

shoe cabinets. The Department invites 

interested parties to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Effective Date: February 6, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Thomas Martin or Howard Smith, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3936 or (202) 482– 

5193, respectively. 

Background 

On January 4, 2005, the Department 

published the Order in the Federal 

Register. On June 2, 2014, the 

Department received a request on behalf 

of Elements International Group LLC 

(‘‘Elements’’) for a changed 

circumstances review to revoke, in part, 

the Order with respect to certain shoe 

cabinets.2 In its request, Elements stated 

that the American Furniture 

Manufacturing Committee for Legal 

Trade and Vaughan-Basset Furniture 

Company, Inc. (‘‘Petitioners’’) discussed 

the scope exclusion described below 

and are in agreement with the 

revocation, in part. On June 3, 2014, the 

Department received a letter from the 

Petitioners in which they stated they 

were in agreement with the proposed 

scope exclusion language in Elements’ 

June 2, 2014, changed circumstances 

review request.3

On July 15, 2014, we published the 

Initiation Notice in the Federal 

Register.4 Because the statement 

submitted by Petitioners in support of 

Elements’ Request did not indicate 

whether Petitioners account for 

substantially all of the domestic wooden 

bedroom furniture production, in the 

Initiation Notice, we invited interested 

parties to submit comments concerning 

industry support, as well as comments 

and/or factual information regarding the 

changed circumstances review.5 We 

received no comments concerning 

industry support. 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by the order is 

wooden bedroom furniture. Wooden 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES