UNITED
STATES

SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington,
D.C. 20549



FORM
20-F





(
 ) REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE
SECURITIES

EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

OR



(X)
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF

1934

For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003

OR



(
 ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT

OF
1934

For
the transition period from  to



Commission
file number 0-28528



ALMADEN
MINERALS LTD.

(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



British
Columbia, Canada

(Jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)



750
West Pender Street, #1103, Vancouver, British Columbia  V6C 2T8

(Address
of principal executive offices)



Securities
registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.

Title
of each class

Name
of each exchange on which registered





None
                                                                                   N/A



Securities
registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.



Common
Stock without par value

(Title
of Class)



Securities
for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.





None



Indicate
the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer's classes of capital or
common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

27,627,079



Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 12 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.



(
X )   Yes    (    )   No



Indicate
by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to
follow.



(
X )   Item 17   (    )   Item 18



---

TABLE
OF CONTENTS







PageGlossary
        of Geologic and Mining TermsPART
        IItem
        1
      Identity
        of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
      14Item
        2
      Offer
        Statistics and Expected Timetable
      14Item
        3
      Key
        Information
      14Item
        4
      Information
        on the Company
      20Item
        5
      Operating
        and Financial Review and Prospects
      67Item
        6
      Directors,
        Senior Management and Employees
      71Item
        7
      Major
        Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
      78Item
        8
      Financial
        Information
      78Item
        9
      The
        Offer and Listing
      79Item
        10
      Additional
        Information
      81Item
        11
      Quantitative
        and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
      88Item
        12
      Description
        of Securities Other than Equity Securities
      88PART
        IIItem
        13
      Defaults,
        Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
      88Item
        14
      Material
        Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders andUse
        of Proceeds
      89Item
        15
      Controls
        and Procedures
      89Item
        16A
      Audit
        Committee Financial Expert
      89Item
        16B
      Code
        of Ethics
      89Item
        16C
      Principal
        Accountant Fees and Services
      89Item
        16D
      Exemptions
        from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
      89Item
        16E
      Purchase
        of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
      89PART
        IIIItem
        17
      Financial
        Statements
      90Item
        18
      Financial
        Statements
      90Item
        19
      Exhibits
      90Signatures
      126






2





---

Glossary
of Geologic and Mining Terms



Adularia:A colourless, moderate to low-temperature variety of orthoclase
feldspar typically with a relatively high barium content.  It is a
prominent constituent of low sulphidation epithermal veins.



Alkalic
Intrusive:An igneous rock emplaced below ground level in which the
feldspar is dominantly sodic and or potassic.



Alkalinity:The chemical nature of solutions characterized by a high concentration
of hydroxyl ions.



Andesite:
 A dark-coloured, fine-grained extrusive rock that, when porphyritic,
contains phenocrysts composed primarily of zoned sodic plagioclase (esp.
andesine) and one or more of the mafic minerals (eg. Biotite, horn-blende,
pyroxene), with a ground-mass composed generally of the same minerals as the
phenocrysts; the extrusive equivalent of diorite.  Andesite grades
into latite with increasing alkali feldspar content, and into dacite
with more alkali feldspar and quartz.  It was named by Buch in 1826 from
the Andes Mountains, South America.



Anomalous:A geological feature, often subsurface, distinguished by geological,
geochemical or geophysical means, which is detectably different than the general
surroundings and is often of potential economic value.



Anomaly:Any concentration of metal noticeably above or below the average
background concentration.



Argillic:
 A form of alteration characterised by the alteration of original minerals
to clays.



Arsenopyrite:
 A sulphide of arsenic and iron with the chemical composition FeAsS.



Assay:
 An analysis to determine the presence, absence or quantity of one or more
components.



Axis:
 An imaginary hinge line about which the fold limbs are bent. The axis of a
fold can be at the top or bottom of the fold, can be tilted or horizontal.



Batholith:
 An intrusion, usually granitic, which has a large exposed surface area and
no observable bottom. Usually associated with orogenic belts.



Breccia:
 Rock consisting of more or less angular fragments in a matrix of
finer-grained material or cementing material.



Brecciated:
 Rock broken up by geological forces.



Bulk
sample:  A very large sample, the kind of sample to take from broken
rock or of gravels and sands when testing placer deposits.



Calc-silicate:
  Calcium-bearing silicate minerals. These minerals are commonly
formed as a result of the interaction of molten rock and its derived, hot
hydrothermal fluids with very chemically reactive calcium carbonate (limestone).
Calc-silicate minerals include garnet, pyroxene, amphibole and epidote. These
minerals are commonly described as skarn and are genetically and spatially
associated with a wide range of metals



Chert:A very fine grained siliceous rock.  Many limestones contain
nodules and thin lenses of chert.



Chip
sample:  A sample composed of discontinuous chips taken along a surface
across a given line.



Claim:
 That portion of public mineral lands, which a party has staked or marked
out in accordance with provincial or state mining laws, to acquire the right to
explore for the minerals under the surface.



3



---

Clastic:Consisting of rock material that has been mechanically derived,
transported, and deposited.  Such material is also called detrital.



Cleavage:The tendency of a crystal to split, or break, along planes of
structural weakness.



Columnar
Jointing:A pattern of jointing that breaks rock into rough, six-sided
columns.  Such jointing is characteristic of basaltic flows and sills and
is believed to result from shrinkage during cooling.



Concordant
Bodies:Intrusive igneous bodies whose contacts are parallel to the
bedding of the intruded rock.



Conglomerate: Rock composed of mostly rounded fragments which are of gravel size or
larger in a finer grained matrix.



Craton:A central stable region common to nearly all continents and composed
chiefly of highly metamorphosed Precambrian rocks.



Crystalline:
 Means the specimen is made up of one or more groups of crystals.



Cut-off
grade:  The minimum grade of mineralization used to establish
quantitative and qualitative estimates of total mineralization.



Dacite: A fine grained acid volcanic rock, similar to rhyolite in which the
feldspar is predominantly plagioclase.



Degradation:The ongoing process of erosion in a stream.



Diabase:
 Igneous hypabyssal rocks. The name is applied differently in different
parts of the world leading to considerable confusion.



Diagenesis:The changes that occur in a sediment during and after lithification.
 These changes include compaction, cementation, replacement, and
recrystallization.



Diamond
drill:  A type of rotary drill in which the cutting is done by abrasion
using diamonds embedded in a matrix rather than by percussion. The drill cuts a
core of rock which is recovered in long cylindrical sections.



Dilution:
 Results from the mixing in of unwanted gangue or waste rock with the ore
during mining.



Dip:
 Geological measurement of the angle of maximum slope of planar elements in
rocks. Can be applied to

beddings,
jointing, fault planes, etc.



Discordant
Bodies:Intrusive igneous bodies whose contacts cut across the
bedding, or other pre-existing structures, to the intruded rock.



Disseminated
deposit:  Deposit in which the mineralization is scattered through a
large volume of host rock, sometimes as separate mineral grains, or sometimes
along joint or fault surfaces.



Dolomite:
 A magnesium bearing limestone usually containing at least 15% magnesium
carbonate.



Dunite:An intrusive, monomineralic, ultramafic rock composed almost
completely of magnesian olivine.



Dyke:A tabular, discordant, intrusive igneous body.



Ejecta:Pyroclastic material thrown out or ejected by a volcano. It includes
ash, volcanic bombs, and lapilli.



4



---

Epithermal:
 Epithermal deposits are a class of ore deposits that form generally less
than 1 km from surface. These deposits, which can host economic quantities of
gold, silver, copper, lead and zinc are formed as a result of the

precipitation
of ore minerals from up-welling hydrothermal fluids. There are several classes
of epithermal deposits that are defined on the basis of fluid chemistry and
resulting alteration and ore mineralogy. Fluid chemistry is largely controlled
by the proximity to igneous intrusive rocks and as a result igneous fluid
content.



Extrusive
Rock:Igneous rock that has solidified on the earth's surface from
volcanic action.



Fault:
 (a) A fracture or fracture zone along which there has been displacement of
the sides relative to one another parallel to the fracture.  (b) A break in
the continuity of a body of rock.



Feasibility
study:  Detailed study to determine if a property can be mined at a
profit and the best way to mine it.



Feldspar:A group of aluminum silicate minerals closely related in chemical
composition and physical properties.  There are two major chemical
varieties of feldspar:  the potassium aluminum, or potash, feldspars and
the sodium-calcium-aluminum, or plagioclase, feldspars.  The feldspars
possess a tetrahedral framework of silicon and oxygen, with the partial
substitution of aluminum for the silicon.  They make up about 60 percent of
the earth's crust.



Felsic:
 Light coloured silicate minerals, mainly quartz and feldspar, or an
igneous rock comprised largely of felsic minerals (granite, rhyolite).



Fluid
inclusion:A cavity, with or without negative crystal faces,
containing one or two fluid phases, and possibly one or more minute crystals, in
a host crystal.  If two fluid phases are present, the vapour phase (bubble)
may show Brownian motion.



Folds:
 Are flexures in bedded or layered rocks. They are formed when forces are
applied gradually to rocks over a long period of time.



Fracture:
 Breaks in a rock, usually due to intensive folding or faulting.



Gabbro:A group of dark-colored, basic intrusive igneous rocks composed
principally of basic plagioclase (commonly labradorite or bytownite) and
clinopyroxene (augite), with or without olivine and orthopyroxene; also, any
member of that group.  It is the approximate intrusive equivalent of
basalt.  Apatite and magnetite or ilmenite are common accessory minerals.



Gambusino:

Small
miners working without machinery.



Gangue:
 Term used to describe worthless minerals or rock waste mixed in with the
valuable minerals.



Geochemical
Anomaly:An area of elevated values of a particular element in soil or
rock samples collected during the preliminary reconnaissance search for locating
favourable metal concentrations that could indicate the presence of surface or
drill targets.



Geochemistry:
 The study of the chemistry of rocks, minerals, and mineral deposits.



Geophysics:
 The study of the physical properties of rocks, minerals, and mineral
deposits.



Gneiss:A coarse grained metamorphic rock characterized by alternating bands
of unlike minerals, commonly light bands of quartz and feldspar and dark bands
of mica and hornblende.



Gossan:
 The leached and oxidised near surface part of a sulphide mineral deposit,
usually consisting largely of hydrated iron oxides left after copper and other
minerals have been removed by downward leaching.



5



---

Grade:
 The concentration of each ore metal in a rock sample, usually given as
weight percent. Where extremely low concentrations are involved, the
concentration may be given in grams per tonne (g/t) or ounces per ton (oz/t).
The grade of an ore deposit is calculated, often using sophisticated statistical
procedures, as an average of the grades of a very large number of samples
collected from throughout the deposit.



Granite:
 A coarse grained, plutonic igneous rock that is normally pale pink, pale
pink-brown, or pale grey, and composed of quartz, alkali feldspar, micas and
accessory minerals.



Grid:A network composed of two sets of uniformly spaced parallel lines,
usually intersecting at right angles and forming squares, superimposed on a map,
chart, or aerial photograph, to permit identification of ground locations by
means of a system or coordinates and to facilitate computation of direction and
distance and size of geologic, geochemical or geophysical features.



Hanging
wall and Footwall:Terms used in reference to faults where when mining along
a fault, your feet would be in the footwall side of the fault and the other side
would be "hanging" over your head.



Hectare:
 A square of 100 metres on each side.



Host
rock:The rock within which the ore deposit occurs.



Hydrothermal:Of or pertaining to hot water, to the action of hot water, or to the
products of this action, such as a mineral deposit precipitated from a hot
aqueous solution; also, said of the solution itself.  "Hydrothermal" is
generally used for any hot water, but has been restricted by some to water of
magmatic origin.



Igneous:
 Means a rock formed by the cooling of molten silicate material.



Ignimbrite:The rock formed by the widespread deposition and consolidation of ash
flows and nues ardentes.  The term includes welded tuff and
nonwelded but recrystallized ash flows.



Indicated
Mineral Resource:An 'Indicated Mineral Resource' is that part of a Mineral
Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape and physical
characteristics, can be estimated with a level of confidence sufficient to allow
the appropriate application of technical and economic parameters, to support
mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit.  The
estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration and testing information
gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as out-crops,
trenches, pits, workings and drill holes that are spaced closely enough for
geological and grade continuity to be reasonably assumed.



Induced
polarization (I.P.) method:  The method used to measure various
electrical responses to the passage of alternating currents of different
frequencies through near-surface rocks or to the passage of pulses of
electricity.



Inferred
Mineral Resource:An 'Inferred Mineral Resource' is that part of a
Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade or quality can be estimated on the
basis of geological evidence and limited sampling and reasonably assumed, but
not verified, geological and grade continuity.  The estimate is based on
limited information and sampling gathered through appropriate techniques from
locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes.



Intermediate:
 An igneous rock made up of both felsic and mafic minerals (diorite).



Intrusion:
 General term for a body of igneous rock formed below the surface.



Intrusive
Rock:Any igneous rock solidified from magma beneath the earth's
surface.



Joint
venture agreement:  An agreement where the parties agree to the terms
on which a property will be explored, developed, and mined.

Kimberlite:A kimberlite is a pipe-like volcano sourced from deep within the earth
under extreme temperatures and



6



---

pressures.
 It is the host rock for diamonds and diamond indicator minerals such as
kimberlitic ilmenites and garnets.



K-silicate: Potassium-bearing silicates. Potassium silicates are very common
rock-forming minerals, however they are also formed by the interaction of
hyrothermal fluids derived from the cooling intrusive rocks that are genetically

and
spatially associated with porphyry and epithermal deposits. Potassium feldspar
(orthoclase) and potassium mica (biotite) are both commonly closely associated
with copper-molybdenum ore in porphyry copper deposits.



K-spar: Potassium feldspar.



Lamprophyre:A group of dike rocks in which dark minerals occur both as phenocrysts
and in the groundmass and light minerals occur in the groundmass.
 Essential constituents are biotite, hornblende, pyroxene, and feldspar or
feldspathoids.  Most lamprophyres are highly altered.  They are
commonly associated with carbonatites.



Lava:
 Means an igneous rock formed by the cooling of molten silicate material
which escapes to the earth's surface or pours out onto the sea floor.



Limestone:
 Sedimentary rock that is composed mostly of carbonates, the two most
common of which are calcium and magnesium carbonates.



Lithosphere:The crust and upper mantle, located above the asthenosphere and
composing the rigid plates.



Mafic:
 A term used to describe ferromagnesian minerals. Rocks composed mainly of
ferromagnesian minerals are correctly termed melanocratic.



Mafic:A general term used to describe ferromagnesian minerals.



Magma:Naturally occurring molten rock material, generated within the earth
and capable of intrusion and extrusion, from which igneous rocks have been
derived through solidification and related processes.  It may or may not
contain suspended solids (such as crystals and rock fragments) and/or gas
phases.



Massive:
 Implies large mass. Applied in the context of hand specimens of, for
example, sulphide ores, it usually means the specimen is composed essentially of
sulphides with few, if any, other constituents.



Measured
MineralResource:  A 'Measured
Mineral Resource' is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade
or quality, densities, shape, physical characteristics are so well established
that they can be estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate
application of technical and economic parameters, to support production planning
and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit.  The estimate is
based on detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing information
gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops,
trenches, pits, workings and drill holes that are spaced closely enough to
confirm both geological and grade continuity.



Metamorphic:
 Means any rock which is altered within the earth's crust by the effects of
heat and/or pressure and/or chemical reactions.



Metamorphic:Pertaining to the process of metamorphism or to its results.



Metasediment:
 A sediment or sedimentary rock that shows evidence of having been
subjected to metamorphism.



Metavolcanic:An informal term for volcanic rocks that show evidence of having been
subject to metamorphism.



Mineral
claim:  A legal entitlement to minerals in a certain defined area of
ground.



7



---

Mineral
Deposit or Mineralized Material:A mineralized underground body which
has been intersected by sufficient closely spaced drill holes and or underground
sampling to support sufficient tonnage and average grade of metal(s) to warrant
further exploration-development work.  This deposit does not qualify as a
commercially mineable ore body

(Reserves),
as prescribed under Commission standards, until a final and comprehensive
economic, technical, and legal feasibility study based upon the test results is
concluded



Mineral:A naturally occurring, inorganic, solid element or compound that
possesses an orderly internal arrangement of atoms and a unique set of physical
and chemical properties.



Mineral
Resource:A Mineral Resource is a concentration or occurrence of
natural, solid, inorganic or fossilized organic material in or on the Earth's
crust in such form and quantity and of such a grade or quality that it has
reasonable prospects for economic extraction.  The location, quantity,
grade, geological characteristics and continuity of a Mineral Resource are
known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge.



Mineral
Reserve:  A Mineral Reserve is the economically mineable part of a
Measured or Indicated Mineral Resource demonstrated by at least a Preliminary
Feasibility Study.  This Study must include adequate information on mining,
processing, metallurgical, economic and other relevant factors that demonstrate,
at the time of reporting, that economic extraction can be justified.  A
Mineral Reserve includes diluting materials and allowances for losses that may
occur when the material is mined.



Mineralization:
 Usually implies minerals of value occurring in rocks.



Monocline:A structure in which a bed exhibits local steepening of otherwise
uniform dip.



Net
profits interest:   The profits after deduction of expenses. Often
a form of royalty.



Net
smelter returns:  Means the amount actually paid to the mine or mill
owner from the sale of ore, minerals and other materials or concentrates mined
and removed from mineral properties. A royalty based on net smelter returns
provides cash flow that is free of any operating or capital costs and
environmental liabilities.



Option
agreement:  An agreement where the optionee can exercise certain
options to increase our interest in a property by making periodic payments to
the optionor or by exploring, developing or producing from the optionor's
property.



Ore:
 A natural aggregate of one or more minerals which may be mined and sold at
a profit, or from which some part may be profitably separated.



Ore
reserve:  The measured quantity and grade of all or part of a
mineralized body in a mine or undeveloped

mineral
deposit for which the mineralization is sufficiently defined and measured on
three sides to form the basis of at least a preliminary mine production plan for
economically viable mining.



Orogeny:
 The process of forming mountains by folding and thrusting.



Outcrop:An in situ exposure of bedrock.



Overburden:
 A general term for any material covering or obscuring rocks from view.



oz/t
or opt:  Ounces per ton.



Paleozoic:An era of geologic time, from the end of the Precambrian to the
beginning of the Mesozoic, or from about 570 to about 225 million years ago.



Peridotite:A coarse grained ultramafic rock commonly consisting of olivine and
pyroxenes.

Phenocrysts:
 An unusually large crystal in a relatively finer grained matrix.



8



---





Phonolite:
 Any extrusive rock composed of alkali feldspar, mafic minerals and any
feldspathoid, such as nepheline, leucite, or sodalite.



Pluton:
 Term for an igneous intrusion, usually formed from a magma.



Porphyry:An igneous rock composed of larger crystals set within a finer ground
mass.



Probable
Mineral Reserve:  A 'Probable Mineral Reserve' is the economically
mineable part of an Indicated, and in some circumstances a Measured Mineral
Resource demonstrated by at least a Preliminary Feasibility Study.  This
Study must include adequate information on mining, processing, metallurgical,
economic, and other relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting,
that economic extraction can be justified.



Proven
Mineral Reserve: A 'Proven Mineral Re
serve
 ' is the economically mineable part of a Measured Mineral Resource demonstrated
by at least a Preliminary Feasibility Study.  This Study must include
adequate information on mining, processing, metallurgical, economic, and other
relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that economic
extraction is justified.



Pyroclastic
rock:  A rock of volcanic origin consisting of highly variable mixture
of rock fragments, cinders and ashes and bits of crystals and glass.



Pyroclastic
Rock:Fragmental rock material resulting from explosive volcanic
eruptions.  Such material is literally deposited from the air and includes
volcanic bombs, blocks, tuff, cinders, ash, and pumice.



Pyroxenites:Ultramafic plutonic rock chiefly composed of pyroxene, with accessory
hornblende, biotite, or olivine.



Rare
Earth:A group of rare metallic chemical elements with consecutive
atomic numbers of 57 to 71.



Reclamation
bond:  Usually required when mechanized work is contemplated. Used to
reclaim any workings or put right any damage, if your reclamation does not
satisfy the requirements of the regulations.



Reserve:That part of a mineral deposit which could be economically extracted
or produced at the time of the reserve determination.



Reserves:A natural aggregate of one or more minerals which, at a specified time
and place, may be mined and sold at a profit, or from which some part may be
profitably separated.



Reverse
circulation drill:   A rotary percussion drill in which the
drilling mud and cuttings return to the surface through the drill pipe.



Rhyolite:
 The fine grained equivalent of a granite.



Royalty
interest:  A royalty interest is tied to some production unit such as
tonne of concentrate or ounce of gold or silver produced. A common form of
royalty interest is based on the net smelter return.



Sample:
 Small amount of material that is supposed to be absolutely typical or
representative of the object being sampled.



Sandstone:Composed of sand-sized fragments cemented together. As a rule the
fragments contain a high percentage of quartz.



9



---

Schist:A strongly foliated crystalline rock, formed by dynamic metamorphism,
that has well-developed parallelism of more than 50% of the minerals present,
particularly those of lamellar or elongate prismatic habit, e.g. mica and
hornblende.



Sedimentary: A rock formed from cemented or compacted sediments.



Sediments:
  Are composed of the debris resulting from the weathering and breakup
of other rocks that have been deposited by or carried to the oceans by rivers,
or left over from glacial erosion or sometimes from wind action.



Sericite:
  A fine-grained variety of mica occurring in small scales, especially
in schists.



Shale:
  An argillaceous rock consisting of silt or clay-sized particles
cemented together. Most shales are quite soft, because they contain large
amounts of clay minerals.



Shear
zone:  Where a fault affects a width of rock rather than being a single
clean break, the width of affected rock is referred to as the shear zone. The
term implies movement, i.e. shearing.



Silicate:
 Most rocks are made up of a small number of silicate minerals ranging from
quartz (SiO2) to more complex minerals such as orthoclase feldspar (KAlSi3O8) or
hornblende (Ca2Na(Mg,Fe)4(Al,Fe,Ti)Si8)22(OH)2).



Sill:
 Tabular intrusion which is sandwiched between layers in the host rock.



Skarn:A thermally altered impure limestone in which material has been added
to the original rock.  Skarns are generally characterized by the presence
of calcium and silica rich minerals. Many skarns contain sulphide minerals which
in some cases can be of economic value.



Sonic
drill:A drill used to penetrate soft sediments where the drill
advance by means of slow rotations an
d
 sonic vibrations. Samples of very soft material can be collected with this
system.



Stock:An igneous intrusive body of unknown depth with a surface exposure of
less tha
n
 104 square kilometers.  The sides, or contacts, of a stock, like those of
a batholith, are usually steep and broaden with depth.



Stockwork:
 A mineral deposit consisting of a three-dimensional network of closely
spaced planar or irregular veinlets.



Strike:The bearing, or magnetic compass direction, of an imaginary line
formed by the intersection of a horizontal plane with any planar surface, most
commonly with bedding planes or foliation planes in rocks.



Sulphide
minerals:  A mineral compound characterized by the linkage of sulfur
with a metal or semimetal; e.g., galena.



Syncline:A fold in which the bed has been forced down in the middle or up on
the sides to form a trough.



Tailings:
 Material rejected from a mill after recoverable valuable minerals have
been extracted.



Tailings
pond:  A pond where tailings are disposed of.



Tourmaline:A group of minerals of general formula (Na,Ca)(Mg,Fe+2,Fe+3,Al,Li)3Al6(BO3)3Si6O18(OH)4;
it sometimes contains fluorine in small amounts.  Also, any mineral of the
tourmaline group.  Tourmaline occurs in 3-, 6-, or 9-sided prisms, usually
vertically striated, or in compact or columnar masses; it is commonly found as
an accessory mineral in granitic pegmatites, and is widely distributed in acid
igneous rocks and in metamorphic rocks.  It can indicative of alteration
associated with porphyry style mineralization.



Tremolite:A white to dark-gray monoclinic mineral of the amphibole group: Ca2Mg5Si8O22(OH)2.
 It occurs in long blade-shaped or short stout prismatic crystals, and also
in columnar or fibrous masses, esp. in metamorphic rocks such as



10



---

crystalline
dolomitic limestone and talc schist.  It is a constituent of much
commercial talc. alteration - usually referring to chemical reactions in a rock
mass resulting from the passage of hydrothermal fluids.



Tuff
:  A finer grained pyroclastic rock made up mostly of ash and other
fine grained volcanic material.



Veins:
 The mineral deposits that are found filling openings in rocks created by
faults or replacing rocks on either side of faults.



Waste:
 Rock which is not ore. Usually referred to that rock which has to be
removed during the normal course of mining in order to get at the ore.



11



---



Notes
Concerning Terminology Related to Resources and Reserves

The
terms "mineral resource", "measured mineral resource",
"indicated mineral resource", "inferred mineral resource", "mineral
reserve", "probable mineral reserve" and "proven mineral reserve" used in this
Annual Report are Canadian mining terms as defined in accordance with National
Instrument 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects under the
guidelines set out in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
(the "CIM") Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves,
adopted by the CIM Council on August 20, 2000 as may be amended from time to
time by the CIM. In accordance with Industry Guide 7, Description of Property by
Issuers Engaged or to be Engaged in Significant Mining Operations, issued by the
U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission, resource is termed "mineralization" or
"mineral deposit".



Cautionary
Note to U.S. Investors concerning estimates of Measured and Indicated Resources

This
Annual Report uses the terms "measured" and "indicated
resources." We advise U.S. investors that while such terms are recognized
and permitted under Canadian regulations, the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission does not recognize them. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume
that any part or all of the mineral deposits in these categories will ever be
converted into reserves.



Cautionary
Note to U.S. Investors concerning estimates of Inferred Resources

This
Annual Report uses the terms "inferred resources." We advise U.S.
investors that while such term is recognized and permitted under Canadian
regulations, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize it.
"Inferred resources" have a great amount of uncertainty as to their
existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It
cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever
be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules estimates of inferred
mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or other economic
studies. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of an
inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally minable.



Glossary
of Abbreviations

Ag:Silver

Au:Gold

Ba:
 Barium

Co:Cobalt

Cu:Copper

EIS:Environmental Impact Statement

Fe:Iron

gpm:gallons per minute

gpt:grams per tonne

g/t:
  grams per tonne

IP:
 Induced Polarization geophysical survey

Ni:Nickel

NSR: net smelter return royalty

Oz:Troy ounce

Pb:
 Lead

Pd:Palladium

PGM:Platinum group minerals

ppb:Parts per billion

ppm:Parts per million

Pt:Platinum

S:Sulphur

tpd:Tonnes per day

ton:Short ton (2,000 pounds)

tonne:Metric ton (1000 kilograms - 2204.62 pounds)

VLF:Very low frequency electromagnetic geophysical survey

VMS:Volcanogenic massive sulphide

| |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | 

12



---



| |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | 
| | 

PART
I





On
August 1, 2001, Fairfield Minerals Ltd. ("Fairfield") and Almaden Resources
Corporation ("Resources") entered into an Amalgamation Agreement providing for
the amalgamation of the two companies and continuation as one company under the
name "Almaden Minerals Ltd." It was the view of the Boards of Directors of
Fairfield and Resources that the amalgamation of the two companies would create
an entity which will be able to attract more senior financing and would also
result in administrative savings by the consolidation of the operations.



Final
determination of the basis for the share exchange ratio for the shareholders of
the two companies in the amalgamated company was determined upon completion of a
Valuation Report and a Fairness Opinion on the proposed amalgamation conducted
by two independent evaluators retained by the companies.  The basis for the
share exchange was determined to be 1 common share of Almaden Minerals Ltd. for
every one share of Fairfield held and 0.77 common shares of Almaden Minerals
Ltd. for every one common share of Resources held.



Ontario
Securities Commission Rule 61-501 and Toronto Stock Exchange policies required
majority of minority approval.  Accordingly, the amalgamation also required
the approval of a majority of the shares voted on the Special Resolution
excluding, in the Fairfield meeting, the shares held by Resources, its insiders,
associates and affiliates, and in the Resources meeting, the shares held by
Fairfield, its insiders, associates and affiliates.  On December 20, 2001,
both companies held a Meeting of Members at which time members of each of the
amalgamating companies were asked to consider, and if thought adviseable, adopt
a Special Resolution to approve the amalgamation.  The Special Resolution
was approved.



The
amalgamation was further subject to the approval of the Supreme Court of British
Columbia.  The Order of the Supreme Court of British Columbia was dated
December 28, 2001, which Order included a hearing and determination that the
issuance and exchange of securities was fair.



The
terms of the Articles and Memorandum of the amalgamated company was approved by
the Registrar of Companies on September 28, 2001.  Essentially, under the
provision of the Company Act pursuant to which the amalgamation proceeded
all matters of substance were accomplished by December 31, 2001.  The
application for the Certificate of Amalgamation was filed with the Registrar of
Companies but its issuance was requested held in order to permit co-ordination
with the listing of the shares of Almaden Minerals Ltd. on the Toronto Stock
Exchange and to avoid any extended trading of Fairfield on the Toronto Stock
Exchange and Resources on the Canadian Venture Exchange.



The
Company was advised in late January, early February 2002 that the Toronto Stock
Exchange had accepted the application for the listing of the shares of Almaden
Minerals Ltd.  On February 1, 2002, the Registrar of Companies issued the
Certificate of Amalgamation.



Based
on the chronology of these events, the Company has determined that for
accounting and taxation purposes the amalgamation is effective December 31,
2001.



13



---

Item
1.     Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors



Not
applicable



Item
2.     Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable



Not
applicable



Item
3.     Key Information



The
amalgamation of Almaden Resources Corporation and Fairfield Minerals Ltd. was
completed effective December 31, 2001. The Consolidated Balance Sheets as at
December 31, 2001 include the assets of Almaden Resources Corporation at their
carrying value and the assets of Fairfield Minerals Ltd. at fair value. The
Consolidated Statements of Loss and Deficit for the years ended December 31,
2001 and 2000 report the results of activities of Almaden Resources Corporation.



The
following selected financial data of the Company for Fiscal 2003, Fiscal 2002
and Fiscal 2001 ended December 31st was derived from the financial statements of
the Company which have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent
Chartered Accountants, as indicated in their report which is included elsewhere
in this Annual Report. The selected financial data set forth for Fiscal 2000 and
Fiscal 1999 ended December 31st are derived from the Company's audited
consolidated financial statements, not included herein.  The selected
financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and other information included elsewhere in the Annual Report.



Reference
is made to Note 1
7
 of the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company included herein
for a discussion of the material differences between Canadian generally accepted
accounting principles ("Canadian GAAP") and United States generally accepted
accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP"), and their effect on the Company's financial
statements.



Table
No. 1

Selected
Financial Data

(expressed
in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share data)



Year
      Year
      Year
      Year
      YearEnded
      Ended
      Ended
      Ended
      Ended12/31/2003
      12/31/2002
      12/31/2001
      12/31/2000
      12/31/1999Canadian
        GAAP
        Revenues
        Net
        loss
        Loss
        per common share
        Weighted
        average shares (000)
        
        Working
        capital
        Properties
        Net
        assets
        Total
        assets
        
        U.S.
        GAAP
        Net
        loss for period(1)
        Loss
        per common share
        Weighted
        average shares (000)
        
        Properties
        Net
        assets
        Total
        assets
        Capital
        stock (000)
      $110
        (1,326)
        (0.06)
        23,379
        
        5,101
        4,198
        9,854
        10,342
        
        
        (2,001)
        (0.09)
        23,379
        
        2,840
        9,395
        9,883
        21,477
      $123
        (3,198)
        (0.16)
        19,524
        
        1,522
        3,338
        5,181
        5,636
        
        
        (2,410)
        (0.13)
        19,524
        
        2,654
        4,728
        5,133
        17,389
      $
        31
        (650)
        (0.05)
        13,412
        
        860
        4,786
        5,839
        6,297
        
        
        (738)
        (0.05)
        13,412
        
        3,471
        4,586
        5,044
        15,011
      $
        73
        (2,795)
        (0.22)
        12,758
        
        1,082
        3,150
        4,705
        4,780
        
        
        (689)
        (0.05)
        12,758
        
        1,923
        3,540
        3,615
        13,227
      $
        83
        (436)
        (0.04)
        10,891
        
        1,294
        4,898
        7,045
        7,116
        
        
        (675)
        (0.06)
        10,891
        
        1,565
        3,712
        3,783
        12,772


(1)Cumulative
U.S. GAAP deficit since inception of the exploration stage to 12/31/2003 has
been $14,897,111.



14



---

Canadian/U.S.
Dollar Exchange Rates



In
this Annual Report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed
in Canadian dollars (CDN$). The Government of Canada permits a floating exchange
rate to determine the value of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar
(US$).



Table
No. 2 sets forth the exchange rate for the Canadian dollars at the end of the
five most recent fiscal periods ended at December 31st, the average
rates for the period, the range of high and low rates and the close for the
period.  Table No. 3 sets forth the range of high and low rates for each
month during the previous six months.



For
purposes of this table, the rate of exchange means the noon buying rate in New
York City for cable transfers in foreign currencies as certified for customs
purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.  The table sets forth the
number of Canadian Dollars required under that formula to buy one U.S. Dollar.
 The average rate means the average of the exchange rates on the last day
of each month during the period.



Table
No. 2

U.S.
Dollar/Canadian Dollar Exchange Rates for Five Most Recent Financial Years



Average
      High
      Low
      CloseFiscal
        Year Ended 12/31/2003
      $1.39
      $1.58
      $1.29
      $1.29Fiscal
        Year Ended 12/31/2002
      1.57
      1.61
      1.51
      1.58Fiscal
        Year Ended 12/31/2001
      1.55
      1.60
      1.49
      1.59Fiscal
        Year Ended 12/31/2000
      1.50
      1.56
      1.44
      1.50Fiscal
        Year Ended 12/31/1999
      1.49
      1.53
      1.44
      1.44




Table
No. 3

U.S.
Dollar/Canadian Dollar Exchange Rates for Previous Six Months



November
      December
      January
      February
      March
      AprilHigh
      $1.34
      $1.34
      $1.33
      $1.34
      $1.35
      $1.37Low
      1.30
      1.25
      1.27
      1.31
      1.31
      1.31




The
exchange rate was 1.37 on April 30, 2004





Risk
Factors



General
Risk Factors Attendant to Resource Exploration and Development

Resource
exploration and development is a speculative business, characterized by a number
of significant risks including, among other things, unprofitable efforts
resulting not only from the failure to discover mineral deposits but from
finding mineral deposits which, though present, are insufficient in quantity and
quality to return a profit from production.  The marketability of minerals
acquired or discovered by the Company may be affected by numerous factors which
are beyond the control of the Company and which cannot be accurately predicted,
such as market fluctuations, the proximity and capacity of milling facilities,
mineral markets and processing equipment, and such other factors as government
regulations, including regulations relating to royalties, allowable production,
importing and exporting of minerals, and environment protection, the combination
of which factors may result in the Company not receiving an adequate return on
investment capital.



Presently,
the Company is in the exploration stage and there is no assurance that a
commercially viable ore deposit (a reserve) exists in any of its properties or
prospects until further exploration work is done and a comprehensive economic
evaluation based upon that work is concluded.  The Company retains an
inventory of gold from previous production by its predecessor ("Fairfield") from
the Siwash mine on the Elk property.  The gold was mined in 1994 and
shipped to the smelter in 1996.  The gold produced was retained as
inventory by Fairfield.  Both the Company and it's predecessor have
financed their operations principally through the sale of equity securities and
entering into joint venture arrangements, and in Fairfield's case, the sale of
its inventory of gold.  While the Company believes it has sufficient
capital and liquidity to finance current operations, nevertheless, its ability
to continue operations is dependent on the ability of the Company to obtain
additional financing.



15



---



Exploration
and Development Efforts May Be Unsuccessful

There
is no certainty that the expenditures to be made by the Company in the
exploration of its properties and prospects as described herein will result in
discoveries of mineralized material in commercial quantities.  Most
exploration projects do not result in the discovery of commercially mineable ore
deposits and no assurance can be given that any particular level of recovery of
ore reserves will in fact be realized or that any identified mineral deposit
will ever qualify as a commercially mineable (or viable) ore body which can be
legally and economically exploited. Estimates of reserves, mineral deposits and
production costs can also be affected by such factors as environmental
permitting regulations and requirements, weather, environmental factors,
unforeseen technical difficulties, unusual or unexpected geological formations
and work interruptions.  In addition, the grade of ore ultimately mined may
differ from that indicated by drilling results.  Short term factors
relating to ore reserves, such as the need for orderly development of ore bodies
or the processing of new or different grades, may also have an adverse effect on
mining operations and on the results of operations.  There can be no
assurance that minerals recovered in small-scale tests will be duplicated in
large-scale tests under on-site conditions or in production scale.
 Material changes in ore reserves, grades, stripping ratios or recovery
rates may affect the economic viability of any project.



Uncertainty
of Obtaining Additional Funding Requirements

If
the Company's exploration programs are successful, additional capital will be
required for the development of an economic ore body and to place it in
commercial production.  The only sources of future funds presently
available to the Company are the sale of its inventory or gold, sale of equity
capital or the offering by the Company of an interest in its properties and
prospects to be earned by another party or parties carrying out further
developmentthereof.  Although the Company
presently has sufficient financial resources to undertake all of its currently
planned exploration programs through Fiscal 2004 and has been successful in the
past in obtaining financing through the sale of equity securities, there is no
assurance that it will be able to obtain adequate financing in the future or
that such financing will be favorable.  Failure to obtain additional
financing on a timely basis could cause the Company to forfeit its interest in
such properties, dilute its interests in the properties and/or reduce or
terminate its operations.



Lack
of Cash Flow

The
Company currently has no revenues from operations as all of its properties and
prospects are in the exploration stage.  There is no assurance that the
Company will receive revenues from operations at any time in the near future.
 The Company has had no prior year's history of earnings or cash flow other
than the NSR royalty from the La Trinidad Mine.
Neither the Company nor its
  predecessor have paid dividends on their shares since incorporation and
the Company does not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future.
 Historically, the only source of funds available to the Company was
through the sale of its equity shares and entering into joint venture
agreements.  The only source of funds available to the Company's
predecessor was through the sale of its inventory of gold, the sale of its
equity shares and entering into joint venture agreements.  Any future
additional equity financing would cause dilution to current stockholders.



Mineral
Prices May Not Support Corporate Profit

The
mining industry in general is intensely competitive and there is no assurance
that, even if commercial quantities of mineral resources are developed, a
profitable market will exist for the sale of same.  Factors beyond the
control of the Company may affect the marketability of any substances
discovered.  The price of minerals is volatile over short periods of time,
and is affected by numerous factors beyond the control of the Company, including
international economic and political trends, expectations of inflation, currency
exchange fluctuations, interest rates and global or regional consumption
patterns, speculative activities and increased production due to improved mining
techniques.



Environmental
Regulations

The
current and anticipated future operations of the Company, including development
activities and commencement of production on its properties, require permits
from various federal, territorial and local governmental authorities and such
operations are and will be governed by laws and regulations governing
prospecting, development, mining, production, exports, taxes, labor standards,
occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental
protection, mine safety and other matters.  Companies engaged in the
development and operation of mines and related facilities generally experience
increased costs, and delays in production and other schedules as a result of the
need to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permits.  The Company's
exploration activities and its potential mining and processing operations are
subject to various laws governing land use, the protection of the environment,
prospecting, development, production, exports, taxes, labor standards,
occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, mine safety and other
matters.  Such operations and exploration activities are also subject



16



---

to
substantial regulation under these laws by governmental agencies and may require
that the Company obtain permits from various governmental agencies.  The
Company believes it is in substantial compliance with all material laws and
regulations which currently apply to its activities.  There can be no
assurance, however, that all permits which the Company may require for
construction of mining facilities and conduct of mining operations will be
obtainable on reasonable terms or that such laws and regulations, or that new
legislation or modifications to existing legislation, would not have an adverse
effect on any exploration or mining project which the Company might undertake.



Failure
to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permitting requirements may
result in enforcement actions thereunder, including orders issued by regulatory
or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may
include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of
additional equipment or remedial actions.  Parties engaged in mining
operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by
reason of the mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or
penalties imposed for violation of applicable laws or regulations.



Amendments
to current laws, regulations and permits governing operations and activities of
mining companies, or more stringent implementation thereof, could have a
material adverse impact on the Company and cause increases in capital
expenditures or production costs or reduction in levels of production at
producing properties or require abandonment or delays in development of new
mining properties.



To
the best of the Company's knowledge, the Company is operating in compliance with
all applicable environmental regulations.



No
Guarantee of Clear Title to Mineral Properties

While
the Company and it's predecessor have investigated title to all of its mineral
properties and prospects, and, to the best of its knowledge, title to all of its
properties and properties in which it has the right to acquire or earn an
interest are in good standing as of the date of this Annual Report, this should
not be construed as a guarantee of title.  The properties and prospects may
be subject to prior unregistered agreements or transfers and title may be
affected by undetected defects.



As
there are unresolved native land claim issues in British Columbia and the Yukon
Territory, the Company's properties and prospects in these jurisdictions may be
affected in the future.  The MOR prospect is on category B lands which
means the local native group has surface rights to the area of the claims and
their permission is required to perform work on the claims.



Possible
Dilution to Present and Prospective Shareholders

The
Company's plan of operation, in part, contemplates the accomplishment of
business negotiations by the issuance of cash, securities of the Company, or a
combination of the two, and possibly, incurring debt.  Any transaction
involving the issuance of previously authorized but unissued shares of common
stock, or securities convertible into common stock, would result in dilution,
possibly substantial, to present and prospective holders of common stock.
  The Company usually seeks joint venture partners to fund exploration
projects.  This dilutes the Company's interest in properties it has
acquired.  This dilution of interest in properties is done to spread or
minimize the risk and to expose the Company to more exploration plays but means
that any profit that might result from a possible discovery would be shared with
the joint venture partner.  There is no guarantee that the Company can find
a joint venture partner for any property.



Lack
of Trading Volume

The
lack of trading volume of the Company's shares reduces the liquidity of an
investment in the Company's shares.



Volatility
of Share Price

Market
prices for shares of early stage companies are often volatile.  Factors
such as announcements of mineral discoveries, financial results, and other
factors could have a significant effect on the price of the Company's shares.



17



---

Risks
Associated with Penny Stock Classification

The
Company's stock is subject to "penny stock" rules as defined in 1934 Securities
and Exchange Act rule 3a51-1.  The Commission has adopted rules that
regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny
stocks.  The Company's common shares are subject to these penny stock
rules.  Transaction costs associated with purchases and sales of penny
stocks are likely to be higher than those for other securities.  Penny
stocks generally are equity securities with a price of less than U.S. $5.00
(other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or
quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that current price and volume information
with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or
system).



The
penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny
stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk
disclosure document that provides information about penny stocks and the nature
and level of risks in the penny stock market.  The broker-dealer also must
provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock,
the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction,
and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held
in the customer's account.  The bid and offer quotations, and the
broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the
customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be
given to the customer in writing before or with the customer's confirmation.



In
addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny
stock not otherwise exempt from such rules, the broker-dealer must make a
special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for
the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction.
 These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of
trading activity in the secondary market for the Company's common shares in the
United States and shareholders may find it more difficult to sell their shares.



Material
Risk of Dilution Presented by Large Number of Outstanding Share Purchase Options
and Warrants

As
of April 30, 2004 there were share purchase options outstanding allowing the
holders of these options to purchase 3,040,783 shares of common stock and share
purchase warrants outstanding allowing the holders to purchase 2,184,105 shares
of common stock.  Directors and officers of the Company hold 2,798,783 of
these share purchase options.  An additional 242,000 share purchase options
are held by employees and consultants of the Company.  Directors of the
Company also hold 77,000 of the share purchase warrants.  Given the fact
that as of April 30, 2004 there were 30,137,517 shares of common stock
outstanding, the exercise of all of the existing share purchase options and
warrants would result in further dilution to the existing shareholders.



These
shares may be issued and could depress the price of the Company's shares.



History
of Net Losses

Both
the Company and its predecessor ("Fairfield") had net losses in a number of
years since their dates of incorporation - 9/25/1980 for the Company and
10/23/1984 for Fairfield. Due to the nature of the Company's business, there can
be no assurance that the Company will be profitable. The Company had net losses
of $1,326,305 in Fiscal 2003, $3,198,025 in Fiscal 2002 and $650,095 in Fiscal
2001. Fairfield had net losses of $218,636 in Fiscal 2001 (ending January 31st).



The
cumulative net loss of the Company as at December 31, 2003 was $13,696,201.



No
Proven Reserves

The
properties and prospects in which the Company has an interest or the concessions
in which the Company has the right to earn an interest are in the exploratory
stage only and are without a known body of ore in commercial production.



Uncertainty
of Reserves and Mineralization Estimates

There
are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating proven and probable reserves
and mineralization, including many factors beyond the control of the Company.
 The estimation of reserves and mineralization is a subjective process and
the accuracy of any such estimates is a function of the quality of available
data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgement.
 Results of drilling, metallurgical testing and production and the
evaluation of mine plans subsequent to the date of any estimate may justify
revision of such estimates.  No assurances can be



18



---

given
that the volume and grade of reserves recovered and rates of production will not
be less than anticipated.  Assumptions about prices are subject to greater
uncertainty and metals prices have fluctuated widely in the past.  Declines
in the market price of base or precious metals also may render reserves or
mineralization containing relatively lower grades of ore uneconomic to exploit.
Changes in operating and capital costs and other factors including, but not
limiting to, short-term operating factors such as the need for sequential
development of ore bodies and the processing of new or different ore grades, may
materially and adversely affect reserves.



Foreign
Incorporation and Civil Liabilities

The
Company amalgamated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada.
 All of the Company's directors and officers are residents of Canada and
substantially all of the Company's assets and its subsidiary are located outside
the United States. Consequently, it may be difficult for United States investors
to effect service of process in the United States upon those directors and
officers who are not residents of the United States, or to realize in the United
States upon judgements of United States courts predicated upon civil liabilities
under the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



Conflict
of Interest

Some
of the Company's directors and officers are directors and officers of other
natural resource or mining-related companies.  These associations may give
rise to conflict of interest from time to time. As a result of these conflicts
of interest, the Company may miss the opportunity to participate in certain
transactions, which may have a material, adverse effect on its financial
position.



Foreign
Operations

The
Company's foreign activities are subject to the risk normally associated with
conducting business in foreign countries, including exchange controls and
currency fluctuations, limitations on repatriation of earnings, foreign
taxation, laws or policies of particular countries, labor practices and
disputes, and uncertain political and economic environments, as well as risks of
war and civil disturbances, or other risk that could cause exploration or
development difficulties or stoppages, restrict the movement of funds or result
in the deprivation or loss of contract rights or the taking of property by
nationalization or expropriation without fair compensation.  Foreign
operations could also be adversely impacted by laws and policies of the United
States affecting foreign trade, investment and taxation.  The Company
currently has exploration projects located in Mexico.



Foreign
Currency Fluctuations

At
the present time, some of the Company's activities are carried on outside of
Canada.  Accordingly, it is subject to risks associated with fluctuations
of the rate of exchange between the Canadian dollar and foreign currencies.



The
Company is currently not engaged in currency hedging to offset any risk of
exchange rate fluctuation and currently has no plans to engage in currency
hedging.



Operating
Hazards and Risks Associated with the Mining Industry

Mining
operations generally involve a high degree of risk, which even a combination of
experience, knowledge and careful evaluation may not be able to overcome.
Hazards such as unusual or unexpected formations and other conditions are
involved.  Operations in which the Company has a direct or indirect
interest will be subject to all the hazards and risks normally incidental to
exploration, development and production of precious and base metals, any of
which could result in work stoppages, damage to or destruction of mines and
other producing facilities, damage to life and property, environmental damage
and possible legal liability for any or all damage.  The Company may become
subject to liability for cave-ins and other hazards for which it cannot insure
or against which it may elect not to insure where premium costs are
disproportionate to the Company's perception of the relevant risks.  The
payment of such insurance premiums and of such liabilities would reduce the
funds available for exploration activities.



The
Ability to Manage Growth

Should
the Company be successful in its efforts to develop its mineral properties or to
raise capital for other mining ventures it will experience significant growth in
operations. If this occurs management anticipates that additional expansion will
be required in order to continue development. Any expansion of the Company's
business would place further demands on its management, operational capacity and
financial resources.  The Company anticipates that it will need to recruit
qualified personnel in all areas of its operations. There can be no assurance
that the Company





19



---

will
be effective in attracting and retaining additional qualified personnel,
expanding its operational capacity or otherwise managing growth. The failure to
manage growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business, financial condition and results of operations.



Lack
of a Dividend Policy

The
Company does not presently intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable
future, as any earnings are expected to be retained for use in developing and
expanding its business.  However, the actual amount of dividends received
from the Company will remain subject to the discretion of the Company's Board of
Directors and will depend on results of operations, cash requirements and future
prospects of the Company and other factors.



Competition

There
is competition from other mining exploration companies with operations similar
to those of the Company's.  Many of the mining companies with which the
Company competes have operations and financial strength many times that of the
Company.  Commodity prices fluctuate and there is no guarantee that market
prices at any one time will be higher than production costs.



Dependence
on Key Personnel

The
Company strongly depends on the business and technical expertise of its
management and key personnel, namely Duane Poliquin and Morgan Poliquin. There
is little possibility that this dependence will decrease in the near term. As
the Company's operations expand, additional general management resources will be
required, especially since the Company encounters risks that are inherent in
doing business in several countries. The Company carries no life insurance on
its management and key personnel.





Item
4.     Information on the Company



The
head office of the Company is located at 750 West Pender Street, Suite 1103,
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6C 2T8.  The registered and records
office of the Company is 1185 West Georgia Street, Suite
1550
 , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6E 4E6.



The
contact persons are Duane Poliquin, President and Morgan Poliquin, Director.
 The telephone number is (604) 689-7644.  The fax number is (604)
689-7645.  The email address is info@almadenminerals.com.  The
web-site address is www.almadenminerals.com.



James E. McInnes is Chair of the independent directors.  The telephone
number is (604) 662-4480. The fax number is (604) 685-0553.  The email
address is jmcinnes@telus.net.



On
August 1, 2001, Fairfield Minerals Ltd. ("Fairfield") and Almaden Resources
Corporation ("Resources") entered into an Amalgamation Agreement providing for
the amalgamation of the two companies and continuation as one company under the
name "Almaden Minerals Ltd." It was the view of the Boards of Directors of
Fairfield and Resources that the amalgamation of the two companies would create
an entity which will be able to attract more senior financing and would also
result in administrative savings by the consolidation of the operations.



Final
determination of the basis for the share exchange ratio for the shareholders of
the two companies in the amalgamated company was determined upon completion of a
Valuation Report and a Fairness Opinion on the proposed amalgamation conducted
by two independent evaluators retained by the companies.  The basis for the
share exchange was determined to be 1 common share of Almaden Minerals Ltd. for
every one share of Fairfield held and 0.77 common shares of Almaden Minerals
Ltd. for every one common share of Resources held.



Ontario
Securities Commission Rule 61-501 and Toronto Stock Exchange policies required
majority of minority approval.  Accordingly, the amalgamation also required
the approval of a majority of the shares voted on the Special Resolution
excluding, in the Fairfield meeting, the shares held by Resources, its insiders,
associates and affiliates, and in the Resources meeting, the shares held by
Fairfield, its insiders, associates and affiliates.  On December 20, 2001,
both companies held a Meeting of Members at which time members of each of the
amalgamating companies were asked to consider, and if thought advisable, adopt a
Special Resolution to approve the amalgamation.  The Special Resolution was
approved.



20



---



The
amalgamation was further subject to the approval of the Supreme Court of British
Columbia.  The Order of the Supreme Court of British Columbia was dated
December 28, 2001, which Order included a hearing and determination that the
issuance and exchange of securities was fair.

The
terms of the Articles and Memorandum of the amalgamated company
were
 approved by the Registrar of Companies on September 28, 2001.
 Essentially, under the provision of the Company Act pursuant to
which the amalgamation proceeded all matters of substance were accomplished by
December 31, 2001.  The application for the Certificate of Amalgamation was
filed with the Registrar of Companies but its issuance was requested held in
order to permit co-ordination with the listing of the shares of Almaden Minerals
Ltd. on the Toronto Stock Exchange and to avoid any extended trading of
Fairfield on the Toronto Stock Exchange and Resources on the Canadian Venture
Exchange.



The
Company was advised in late January, early February 2002 that the Toronto Stock
Exchange had accepted the application for the listing of the shares of Almaden
Minerals Ltd.  On February 1, 2002, the Registrar of Companies issued the
Certificate of Amalgamation.



Based
on the chronology of these events, the Company has determined that for
accounting and taxation purposes the amalgamation is effective December 31,
2001.



The
Company was amalgamated in British Columbia and operates under the laws of the
Province of British Columbia, Canada.



The
Company's common shares began trading on The Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX")
under the symbol "AMM" on February 11, 2002.  Almaden Resources Corporation's
initial public offering on the Vancouver Stock Exchange was pursuant to a
prospectus dated October 10, 1986.  The shares of Fairfield Minerals Ltd.
began trading on the Vancouver Stock Exchange on July 18, 1986 and on The
Toronto Stock Exchange on May 21, 1990.



The
Company currently has five wholly-owned subsidiaries that were formed to hold
properties in their respective jurisdictions-refer to Exhibit 8.



The
Company owns a 40% share interest in ATW Resources Ltd. ("ATW"), a
company incorporated in the Northwest Territories, Canada on January 6, 1993.



The
Company is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and when warranted,
development of mineral properties.  The Company has property interests in
Canada and Mexico. None of the Company's property interests are beyond
exploration stage.  Presently there is no assurance that any of the
Company's mining properties or prospects contain a commercially viable ore body
(reserve) until further exploration work is done and final feasibility study
based upon such work is concluded.  The Company is in the exploration stage
and has not generated any revenues from operations.



The
Company has seven principal property interests: (1) the Elk gold, silver
property which includes the Siwash Gold deposit in Canada (100% interest), (2)
the ATW diamond prospect in Canada (net 30% interest), (3) the Caballo Blanco
gold, silver, copper prospect in Mexico (option to purchase 100% interest
subject to a 60% earn in right by Comaplex Minerals Corp. and a sliding scale
NSR), (4) the Yago/La Sarda gold, silver prospect in Mexico (consists of the
Tepic claim (100% interest) and the La Sarda concession (100% interest)), (5)
the Galeana gold, silver prospect in Mexico (option to acquire 100% interest
subject to a 60% earn in right by Grid Capital Corporation), (6) the El Pulpo
copper, gold prospect in Mexico (option to purchase 100% interest subject to a
60% earn in right by Ross River Minerals Inc.) and (7) the Fuego copper, gold
prospect in Mexico (100% interest subject to a 60% earn in right by Horseshoe
Gold Mining Inc.).



The
Company's secondary property interests include the Ram gold prospect in Canada
(100% interest subject to a 70% earn in right by Ross River Minerals Inc.), the
Rock River Coal project in Canada (50% interest), the PV prospect in Canada
(100% interest subject to a 60% earn in right by Consolidated Spire Ventures
Ltd.), the MOR, Cabin Lake and Caribou Creek prospects in Canada (100% interest
subject to a 60% earn in right by Kobex Resources Ltd.), the Meister River
prospect in Canada (100% interest), the Logan property in Canada (40% net
carried interest to production), the Tim prospect in Canada (100% interest), the
Santa Maria prospect in Mexico (100% interest), the Guadalupe prospect in Mexico
(100% interest subject to a 60% earn in right by Grid Capital



21



---

Corporation),
the San Carlos prospect in Mexico (consists of the San Carlos concession (100%
interest) and  the San Jose claim (100% interest subject to a 2% NSR) all
subject to a 60% earn in right by Hawkeye Gold and Diamond Ltd.) and the Tropico
prospect in Mexico (40% interest).



The
Company has several other property holdings in Canada, United States and Mexico
that are not considered either principal or secondary properties.



The
Company also entered into a joint venture agreement in Fiscal 2002 with BHP
Billiton World Exploration Inc. to undertake exploration in eastern Mexico,
which is ongoing.



Business
Overview



The
Elk Property - Canada



The
Elk Property contains a known mineral deposit but all current work by the
Company on the property is exploratory in nature.



Option
to Acquire Interest

Initial
staking was undertaken in November 1986 with additions in 1987, 1988 and 1989.
 A block comprising 72 units was optioned in October 1988. The Siwash North
mining lease was issued in September 1992. Claim acquisition and subsequent work
were conducted by Cordilleran Engineering Ltd. for the Company's predecessor ("Fairfield")
until April 1995 when Fairfield assumed operations.  Fairfield Minerals
merged with Almaden Resources Corporation in February 2002 and the claims were
transferred to the amalgamated company Almaden Minerals Ltd.



Expenditures
to Date

Fairfield
had incurred more than $10,000,000 in exploration costs on the property; however
with depletion, write-downs and recoveries, the Company had deferred $1,089,462
of exploration costs as at December 31, 2002.

During
Fiscal 2002, the Company entered into an agreement with Wheaton River Minerals
Ltd. who, upon providing $350,000 for exploration, earned a 10% interest in the
property which was then converted into 388,889 shares of the Company at a
conversionprice of $0.90 per share.



During
Fiscal 2003, the Company incurred $555,234 in exploration costs including a
diamond drill program on the property.  As at December 31, 2003, the
Company had deferred $1,644,696 of exploration costs on this property.



Location
and Access

The
Elk Property consists of 82 contiguous mineral claims comprising 491 units plus
a 6 unit mining lease located 40 kilometers west of Peachland, British Columbia
in the Similkameen Mining Division. The claims cover forested, gently rolling
hills with fair to poor bedrock exposure.  The property is accessible by
paved highway, 50 kilometers from Westbank, British Columbia, or 50 kilometers
from the town of Merritt, British Columbia.



History
and Recent Work

The
property includes the Siwash Gold Mine, which, between 1992 and 1997, has
produced 51,460 ounces of gold at an average grade of 2.78 oz/t.



Work
conducted on the property from 1986 to 1991 consisted of geological mapping,
prospecting, linecutting, soil sampling, geophysics, excavator trenching (8.69
km), diamond drilling (111 holes, 12,524 m) and road construction.



During
1992, a bulk sample was extracted from an open pit on the Siwash vein in the
Siwash North area.  It totalled 2240 tons grading 4.016 ounces/ton gold.
 A total of 70 reverse circulation holes were drilled to confirm the vein
grade and continuity in the 1993 pit expansion area.  Open pit mining was
carried out by Wiltech Developments of Kelowna,

B.C.
under the supervision of Cordilleran Engineering.  The ore was shipped to
the Noranda smelter in Rouyn, Quebec in November.



In
1993, bulk sampling from the open pit continued with the extraction of 3733 tons
of mineralized material grading 3.080 oz/t gold.  Wiltech Developments was
contracted to carry out the open pit mining under supervision of



22



---

Cordilleran
Engineering personnel.  Mainstreet Mining of Whitehorse, Yukon was
contracted to undertake underground development to provide access for test
mining and underground drilling.  The 3.5 by 3.0 metre decline was collared
at the 1628m elevation in June and reached the 1570m elevation in October.
 Test mining stopes were excavated at the 1611 and 1570 levels.  Ore
from the open pit and underground operations was shipped through the summer and
fall to the Asarco smelter in Helena Montana. Eleven reverse circulation holes
were drilled to the south of the open pit to provide closer spaced data for the
planning of the 1994 open pit expansion.



In
1994, Fairfield received a mining permit, the open pit was expanded to a total
size of 458,000 cubic metres and 10,119 tons of ore grading 2.669 oz/ton gold
were extracted.  Ledcor Industries of Vancouver, B.C. was contracted to
carry out the open pit excavation under the supervision of Cordilleran
Engineering Ltd.  The ore was crushed to minus 6 inches and was shipped to
the Asarco Smelter in Helena Montana.  Fairfield received credits for gold,
silver and silica.  An underground drill program was carried out at ten to
twenty metre centres for a total of 2419 metres in 84 NQ holes to help define
underground mineable shoots.



During
1995 underground development was completed to the 1511m elevation and longhole
and shrinkage mining tests were carried out with shrinkage proving to be the
more applicable method.  An underground drill program comprising 217 NQ
holes at ten metres centres for a total of 7612 metres was undertaken to fully
test the area accessible by the existing underground development. Ninety-eight
surface NQ diamond drill holes tested the areas beyond the reach of the decline
and other targets on the claim group for a total of 4645m. Including all
previous drilling, an area of about 340m by 150m had been tested at a hole
spacing of less than 20m.



Surface
diamond drilling totaling 6946.34 meters in 88 holes was completed on the Siwash
mining lease during 1996.  Detailed drilling in the area of the proposed
Phase 5.5 open pit at approximately 20 meter centers outlined an open pitable
volume of mineralized material of 16,200 ounces of gold in 10,146 tons at a
grade of 1.597 oz/t.  Five holes were drilled in the Deep B area down dip
from the existing underground development and increased the amount of
mineralized material in this area to 12,200 tons at a grade of 2.925 oz/t.
 A new vein, known as the WD zone was outlined by 25 holes over a strike
length of 440 meters and added 6000 tons of mineralized material at 3.049 oz/t
Au to the property inventory. A soil geochemistry anomaly in the Gold Creek West
area was examined with five drill holes and another vein was defined over a
strike length of 160 meters with grades up to 0.574 oz/ton of gold over one
foot.



Limited
prospecting, environmental monitoring and reclamation was done on the property
between 1997 and 1999.



During
August 2000, Fairfield completed a twelve-hole 1400-metre drill program on the
property which targeted three gold bearing quartz vein systems in the Siwash
Mine area.  Prospecting in a new logging clearcut one kilometre to the east
of the mine area has resulted in the discovery of two northeast trending
structures coincident with anomalous gold soil values.



All
rock and soil samples were sent to Acme Analytical Labs of Vancouver, Canada for
assay and analysis.  Check samples were sent to Chemex Labs of Vancouver.
 Environmental water quality samples were sent to ASL Labs of Vancouver.

During
2001, a 230-metre trenching program comprising seven trenches was carried out on
the claims in the Siwash East and Gold Creek West areas.  The trenches were
dug to determine the source of gold bearing quartz fragments found on surface
and in road cuts.  Six trenches in the Siwash East area, located 1.7 km to
the east of the Siwash Mine site, exposed quartz veins up to 20cm thick and
narrow pyritic fault zones cutting quartz monzonite adjacent to an andesite
dyke. The andesite dyke was traced over 150 metres in four trenches with strong
alteration and narrow bands of pyritic gouge containing quartz fragments in the
immediate vicinity of the dyke.  Trench SE01-4 was dug to a depth of 2.5
metres and exposed a steeply dipping quartz vein about 20cm thick.  A 0.5
by 0.5 meter panel sample of the same vein taken in the wall of the trench
returned 21.77 gm/t (0.635 oz/ton) gold and 32.9 gm/t (0.96 oz/ton) silver.
 Adjacent trenches 35 meters to the west and 50 meters east exposed the
andesite dyke with a strong alteration zone but no quartz veins and weak gold
values.



Trench
GCT01-1 was excavated the Gold Creek West area, 400 meters southwest of the mine
site, to further expose a quartz vein discovered earlier in the year by hand
trenching.  Deeper excavation revealed a discontinuous quartz vein
approximately 30cm thick over a length of nine meters hosted in strongly
argillically altered quartz monzonite



23



---

that
shows evidence of slumping and deformation.  The vein returned a value of
20.51 gm/t (0.598 oz/ton) gold and 59.6 gm/t (1.74 oz/ton) silver from a 0.8
meter by 0.5 meter panel sample.



A
comprehensive review of the property database was completed on August 31, 2001
by Leo King, P.Eng., an independent consultant.  His report recommends a
three stage 9500 meter drill program to further explore the Siwash, Gold Creek
West and WD vein systems.



A
trenching program was carried out in the Siwash East area during October of
2001.  A total of six trenches with a cumulative length of 202 meters
located the source of mineralized quartz float discovered by prospecting.
 The trenches exposed narrow quartz veins adjacent to an east-west trending
andesite dyke with grades of up to 21.7 gm/t Au from a 0.5 by 0.5 meter panel
sample.



During
the 2002 field season twenty six NQ diamond drill holes tested the WD, B Zone,
Gold Creek West and Bullion Creek vein systems for a total of 4996m. Seven holes
were drilled into the WD zone to test the perimeter of the known shoot.
 The WD veins were intersected in all holes close to the projected depths
with grades up to 91.22 gm/t Au over a true width of 0.50m.  Eleven holes
were drilled into the Deep B shoot located immediately below the existing
underground development to fill-in the drill spacing to less than 25 meters and
to test the perimeter of the known mineralization.  Two holes were drilled
on the west side of the existing open pit to help determine the feasibility of a
pit expansion to the west. The Gold Creek West vein located approximately 450m
southwest of the existing open pit was tested with four holes in two 50 meter
step-outs to the west of the existing grid.  Two holes were drilled into
the Bullion Creek structure located 700 meters to the north of the open pit to
test a geochemical anomaly.



Geology
and Mineral Deposits

Gold-silver
mineralization on the Elk Property is hosted by pyritiferous quartz veins and
pyritiferous altered granite and volcanics. The mineralized features generally
trend northeasterly and are thought to be Late Cretaceous or Tertiary in age.
 To date, mineralization has been located in seven areas of the Elk
property: Siwash North, South Showing, Discovery Showing, Lake Zone, End Zone,
Great Wall Zone, Elusive Creek, Gold Creek West, and the WD Zone.



The
most recent estimate of contained mineralized material in the Siwash Mine area
was calculated on completion of the 2000 drill program.  The areas drilled
at a spacing of 10 to 20 metres, which included the area accessible from the
existing underground development and the proposed open pit areas, contain
approximately 44,500 tons of material at a grade of 1.041 oz/ton Au.  The
calculations were done using a lower cutoff grade of 17 gm - metres for the
underground accessed material and 5 gm - metres for the open pit accessible
material.  The Siwash mine area drilled at 20 to 50 metre spacing was given
a lower confidence limit.  A radius of influence of 15 metres was applied
to zone intercepts with values greater than 17 gm - metres.  The area
between adjacent holes that met the cutoff criteria beyond the 15m radius was
also included.  The wide spaced drilling areas contain an estimated 61,000
tons of material at a grade of 1.430 oz/ton. An upper cutoff of 100gm - metres
was applied to both the detailed and wider spaced drilled areas.  All
contained mineralization calculations were done by Fairfield personnel.  An
independent calculation was done by Roscoe Postle and Associates in 1995 and by
Giroux Consultants Ltd. in 1999.  Both independent calculations confirmed
or exceeded in house calculations.



Infrastructure

All
major services and labour can be found in Merritt or Westbank, towns accessible
by four lane highway to the east and west of the property.  There is good
road access throughout most of the property by logging roads and a major highway
(97C) crosses the northern claims. Two phase power is available at the highway
2km north of the mine site.  A gas station, motel and restaurant are
located at the highway access on the northern claims.  Cell phone and radio
phone communications are available from the mine site.



Recent
Drilling Results

During
the summer of 2002, a twenty six hole, 5,000 m (meter) diamond drill program was
carried out to test the continuity of mineralization at the Siwash gold mine.
 Siwash Mine presently has an inferred resource of 98,552 ounces gold in
71,300 tons and an indicated resource of 43,410 ounces gold in 44,356 tons for a
total of 141,962 ounces gold in 123,142 tons as calculated on completion of the
last drill program in 2000. Of the indicated resource, 32,980 tons at a grade of
0.834 ounces of gold per ton for a total of 27,430 ounces was classified as a
probable



24



---

reserve
in a preliminary feasibility study entitled "Summary of Ore Reserves and Project
Economics for the Siwash Gold Mine, Dec.1995", by J. McCormack, P.Eng.  The
study included information on mining, processing, metallurgical and operating
costs that demonstrated, at the time the report was written, economic extraction
of the resource was justified.  Calculation of an updated resource estimate
incorporating the 2002 drill intersections is underway. Several structures were
tested in the program, including the WD vein, the Deep B shoot, the Gold Creek
West vein and the Bullion Creek structure.



The
continuity of the WD vein, located 200 m north of the B vein system, was tested
in fifty metre step-outs to the south and east of previous drill perimeter. All
holes intersected the vein near the projected depth. Hole 311, the deepest hole
drilled on the structure, returned 0.567 oz/t (troy ounces per short ton) gold
over a true width interval of 2.15 m indicating good continuity of the structure
and mineralization to depth. The WD structure has been traced along strike for a
length of 525 m and down dip for 320 m. It remains open to the east, west and
down dip.



Two
holes were drilled into the Bullion Creek structure, located 700 m north of the
B vein, to test a zone of hydrothermal alteration not known previously to be
associated with significant gold. Strongly altered granodiorite was intersected
in both holes and narrow pyritic quartz veins returned an assay of 0.246 oz/t
gold over a true width of 0.50 m. The presence of gold mineralization in Bullion
Creek zone establishes good potential for other high-grade shoots and is
considered a priority exploration target.



The
Gold Creek West vein, 400 m southwest of the mine site, was tested by a total of
nine drill holes in 1996 and 2000 and shows continuity of structure and
mineralization over a strike length of 190 m. Four holes drilled this season
intersected the vein at the projected locations and have extended its continuity
a further 100 m to the west. No significant results were returned from the 2002
drilling.



The
Deep B shoot on the B vein system is located immediately below the existing mine
workings and can be accessed by extending the existing decline approximately 600
m.  It contains an inferred resource of 35,600 oz Au in 12,200 tons grading
2.925 oz/t based on the results of the 1996 drilling. The 2002 in fill drilling
decreased the drill intersection spacing to approximately 30 m and tested the
perimeter of the known shoot.



All
samples were analyzed at Acme Analytical Labs in Vancouver using wet geochemical,
fire assay and metallics techniques. Duplicate and blank samples were included
in the sample shipments sent to Acme and confirmed procedural quality. Check
assays were carried out by ALS Chemex Labs in Vancouver. The qualified person
and supervisor of the 2002 exploration drill program was Wojtek Jakubowski,
P.Geo.



Hole
      From
      To
      Interval
      True
        Width
      
      
      Gold
      
      SilverNumber
      Meters
      Meters
      Meters
      Meters
      Feet
      Zone
      oz/t
      gm/T
      oz/t
      gm/TWD
        AreaSND02310
      31.13
      31.65
      0.52
      0.50
      1.6
      B
      0.237
      8.138
      0.153
      5.239SND02311
      43.90
      44.40
      0.50
      0.50
      1.6
      Ba
      0.571
      19.588
      0.295
      10.111SND02311
      269.65
      276.11
      6.46
      4.22
      13.8
      WDb
      0.309
      10.608
      1.435
      49.210SND02311
      273.25
      276.10
      2.85
      2.15
      7.1
      WDb
      0.567
      19.445
      2.661
      91.251SND02312
      109.43
      110.08
      0.65
      0.50
      1.6
      WDb
      0.651
      22.333
      1.149
      39.398SND02313
      163.43
      164.03
      0.60
      0.50
      1.6
      WDb
      1.035
      35.469
      1.809
      62.013SND02332
      230.35
      231.00
      0.65
      0.50
      1.6
      WDa
      0.342
      11.736
      1.081
      37.066SND02334
      202.64
      204.77
      2.13
      2.00
      6.6
      WDa
      0.646
      22.135
      1.335
      45.768SND02334
      203.30
      203.83
      0.53
      0.50
      1.6
      WDa
      2.661
      91.222
      5.471
      187.589SND02335
      54.12
      55.18
      1.06
      1.00
      3.3
      B
      0.442
      15.156
      0.555
      19.027SND02335
      245.11
      246.50
      1.39
      1.20
      3.9
      WDa
      0.249
      8.553
      0.674
      23.125SND02335
      245.11
      247.80
      2.69
      2.40
      7.9
      WDa
      0.378
      12.956
      0.861
      29.532SND02335
      247.27
      247.80
      0.53
      0.50
      1.6
      WDa
      1.086
      37.235
      1.999
      68.553




25



---



Deep
        B AreaSND02326
      179.52
      180.44
      0.92
      0.75
      2.5
      B
      2.594
      88.948
      5.753
      197.251SND02327
      177.15
      177.68
      0.53
      0.50
      1.6
      B
      0.299
      10.236
      0.000
      0.000SND02327
      199.86
      201.00
      1.14
      1.10
      3.6
      B
      0.267
      9.158
      0.328
      11.252SND02330
      234.65
      237.27
      2.62
      2.15
      7.1
      Bc
      0.270
      9.261
      0.224
      7.675SND02330
      236.73
      237.26
      0.53
      0.50
      1.6
      Bc
      1.007
      34.525
      0.686
      23.512SND02331
      255.93
      256.64
      0.71
      0.50
      1.6
      Bb
      0.233
      7.994
      0.214
      7.353Bullion
        Creek AreaSND02315
      74.95
      75.60
      0.65
      0.50
      1.6
      Bull
      0.245
      8.401
      0.452
      15.504




During
Fiscal 2002 the Company purchased a mill or concentrating plant for possible use
at the Siwash property.  The mill capacity is rated at about 125 tons per
day.  The mill was purchased for US$75,000 (CDN$118,500) during Fiscal 2002
that was satisfied as to US$50,000 by the issue of 122,077 shares of Almaden at
a deemed value of CDN$0.65 per share and a cash payment of US$25,000. During
Fiscal 2003, the mill was dismantled and moved to a storage facility near the
property at a cost of $204,766. There has been no feasibility study to justify
construction of the mill nor have permits to construct the mill been applied
for. The mill was purchased because it would be suitable for processing the
Siwash mineralized material and the price was below replacement cost. This low
cost could have an impact on project economics. If studies indicate it would not
be feasible to install this mill on the Siwash project, it will be sold. The
Company has received an estimate that the mill could be sold for approximately
$380,000.



Thirty
NQ diamond drill holes drilled between August 6 and November 1, 2003 tested the
WD Zone for a total of 6570.56m.



Seven
holes were drilled into the WD vein system to the west of the north-northwest
trending RB fault located roughly between 2340E and 2400E. Holes SND03-357 and
359 were targeted to intercept the WD zone on the west side of the RB fault
after drilling through it, however the rods bound tightly in the clay altered
andesite dyke that inhabits the fault and both holes were abandoned. The WD
vein(s) were intersected in both the quartz monzonite and granodiorite in all
the remaining holes between sections 2110E and 2370E. A summary of the drill
core sample results from all zones intersected in 2003 is listed in the table
below. Significant values were also returned from the WD2 zone in holes
SND03-348 (1.023 oz/t over a true width of 1.64 ft) and 354 (6.415 oz/t over a
true width of 1.64 ft. The WD2 zone is subparallel to the WD and is located
about 20 to 30m below.



Twenty
five holes were drilled to the east of the RB fault between 2370E and 2670E to
extend the known resource.  The WD zone(s) were intersected in all holes
with the exception of hole SND03-341 which was terminated before the projected
intercept depth due to excessive deviation.  The known zone was extended to
2670E and to a depth of 340m below surface and 380m down dip.  Fill-in
drilling on sections 2445E, 2495E and 2545E intersected the WD veins at the
expected depth however gold grades were not as high as those found on adjacent
fences.  Hole SND03-360 intersected an andesite dyke at the projected
location of the WD zone and only a narrow vein was encountered there.
 Visible gold was noted in the WDa vein intersection in hole SND03-355
though sampling returned a value of 0.067 oz/t Au.



26



---



2003
        Drill Intersection SummaryHole
      Zone
      Section
      From
        m
      To
        m
      SG
      TW
        m
      TW
        ft
      Au
        gm/t
      Au
        oz/t
      Ag
        gm/t
      Ag
        oz/tSND03337
      WD
      2425E
      253.30
      253.60
      2.95
      1.00
      3.28
      28.25
      0.824
      125.07
      3.648SND03338
      A
      2470E
      24.55
      25.60
      2.70
      1.10
      3.61
      3.81
      0.111
      0.00
      0.000SND03338
      B
      2470E
      11.65
      32.45
      2.70
      17.31
      56.79
      1.20
      0.035
      0.51
      0.015SND03339
      B
      2520E
      44.20
      44.70
      2.70
      0.50
      1.64
      22.60
      0.659
      31.58
      0.921SND03339
      G
      2520E
      136.60
      136.90
      2.69
      0.50
      1.64
      11.90
      0.347
      4.13
      0.120SND03340
      C1
      2570E
      50.10
      50.40
      2.69
      0.50
      1.64
      24.91
      0.727
      7.12
      0.208SND03340
      WDa
      2585E
      267.92
      268.48
      2.75
      1.00
      3.28
      11.47
      0.335
      35.12
      1.024SND03341
      D
      2570E
      86.25
      86.92
      2.70
      0.60
      1.97
      6.86
      0.200
      0.00
      0.000SND03341
      C1
      2570E
      51.05
      51.48
      2.70
      21.05
      69.06
      2.02
      0.059
      0.94
      0.027SND03341
      C1
      2570E
      51.05
      51.48
      2.73
      0.50
      1.64
      78.56
      2.291
      38.83
      1.133SND03342
      B
      2570E
      52.00
      52.30
      2.66
      0.50
      1.64
      3.60
      0.105
      3.93
      0.115SND03342
      C1
      2570E
      59.60
      60.15
      2.66
      1.00
      3.28
      8.92
      0.260
      20.42
      0.596SND03342
      WDa
      2585E
      312.95
      313.27
      2.68
      0.50
      1.64
      9.81
      0.286
      19.18
      0.559SND03343
      B
      2620E
      54.65
      55.00
      2.71
      0.50
      1.64
      18.23
      0.532
      38.91
      1.135SND03343
      D
      2620E
      88.55
      96.70
      2.71
      7.88
      25.85
      4.39
      0.128
      9.52
      0.278SND03343
      E
      2620E
      95.60
      96.70
      2.78
      1.00
      3.28
      33.18
      0.968
      73.10
      2.132SND03343
      WDa
      2630E
      289.30
      289.63
      2.61
      0.65
      2.13
      4.67
      0.136
      103.96
      3.032SND03345
      WD
      2670E
      96.20
      96.50
      2.70
      0.50
      1.64
      2.58
      0.075
      0.00
      0.000*SND03346
      C2
      2670E
      36.82
      37.12
      2.75
      0.50
      1.64
      23.81
      0.694
      54.80
      1.598Hole
      Zone
      Section
      From
        m
      To
        m
      SG
      TW
        m
      TW
        ft
      Au
        gm/t
      Au
        oz/t
      Ag
        gm/t
      Ag
        oz/tSND03346
      WD
      2675E
      152.75
      153.80
      2.74
      1.00
      3.28
      15.90
      0.464
      87.07
      2.540SND03347
      A
      2670E
      28.13
      29.25
      2.70
      1.10
      3.61
      4.17
      0.122
      0.00
      0.000SND03347
      B
      2670E
      33.40
      33.70
      2.70
      1.10
      3.61
      4.17
      0.122
      0.00
      0.000SND03347
      WD
      2670E
      202.88
      203.64
      2.72
      1.00
      3.28
      27.79
      0.811
      49.97
      1.457SND03348
      WD2
      2265E
      139.23
      139.55
      2.82
      0.50
      1.64
      35.09
      1.023
      52.76
      1.539SND03349
      A
      2670E
      38.30
      38.80
      2.70
      0.50
      1.64
      3.29
      0.096
      0.00
      0.000SND03349
      B
      2670E
      46.80
      47.18
      2.70
      0.50
      1.64
      6.07
      0.177
      0.00
      0.000SND03349
      WD
      2675E
      243.77
      244.20
      2.66
      0.50
      1.64
      5.77
      0.168
      35.22
      1.027SND03350
      WD
      2210E
      66.45
      66.75
      2.70
      0.50
      1.64
      2.91
      0.085
      0.00
      0.000SND03351
      B
      2670E
      59.58
      60.04
      2.70
      0.50
      1.64
      7.74
      0.226
      0.00
      0.000SND03351
      WD
      2670E
      292.40
      293.00
      2.60
      0.50
      1.64
      3.39
      0.099
      159.29
      4.646SND03352
      WDa
      2165E
      79.50
      79.80
      2.70
      0.50
      1.64
      2.23
      0.065
      0.00
      0.000SND03352
      WDb
      2165E
      95.30
      95.60
      2.72
      0.50
      1.64
      4.39
      0.128
      7.54
      0.220SND03354
      WD2
      2380E
      274.48
      274.82
      3.15
      0.50
      1.64
      219.96
      6.415
      354.42
      10.337SND03355
      B
      2670E
      71.95
      72.55
      2.70
      1.00
      3.28
      4.25
      0.124
      0.00
      0.000SND03355
      D
      2670E
      105.10
      105.40
      2.70
      0.50
      1.64
      2.57
      0.075
      0.00
      0.000SND03355
      WDa
      2665E
      345.20
      345.63
      2.68
      0.50
      1.64
      2.36
      0.069
      18.19
      0.531SND03355
      WDb
      2665E
      350.30
      350.60
      2.68
      0.50
      1.64
      2.80
      0.082
      6.25
      0.182SND03357
      Ba
      2420E
      35.50
      43.80
      2.70
      8.14
      26.71
      2.22
      0.065
      0.70
      0.020




27



---



SND03357
      Bb
      2415E
      43.50
      43.80
      2.70
      0.50
      1.64
      29.84
      0.870
      11.39
      0.332SND03358
      B
      2620E
      70.30
      70.60
      2.63
      0.50
      1.64
      8.51
      0.248
      3.99
      0.116SND03358
      D
      2620E
      99.30
      100.30
      2.62
      1.00
      3.28
      7.18
      0.209
      23.36
      0.681SND03358
      WDa
      2625E
      337.38
      337.70
      2.74
      1.20
      3.94
      11.88
      0.346
      36.64
      1.069SND03360
      G
      2445E
      71.30
      71.60
      2.70
      0.50
      1.64
      2.62
      0.076
      0.00
      0.000SND03361
      WDc
      2450E
      119.50
      119.80
      2.74
      0.50
      1.64
      11.06
      0.323
      7.77
      0.227SND03362
      WD
      2495E
      149.30
      149.86
      2.71
      0.60
      1.97
      8.18
      0.239
      19.06
      0.556SND03363
      C1
      2545E
      13.30
      13.60
      2.70
      0.50
      1.64
      5.59
      0.163
      0.00
      0.000SND03363
      D1
      2545E
      22.13
      22.95
      2.70
      1.00
      3.28
      4.72
      0.138
      0.00
      0.000SND03363
      D2
      2545E
      37.50
      37.80
      2.68
      1.20
      3.94
      5.68
      0.166
      1.36
      0.040SND03364
      C
      2495E
      25.40
      25.75
      2.70
      0.50
      1.64
      2.32
      0.068
      0.00
      0.000SND03364
      WD
      2500E
      196.70
      197.70
      2.76
      0.80
      2.62
      16.14
      0.471
      44.40
      1.295SND03365
      B
      2545E
      21.85
      22.20
      2.70
      0.50
      1.64
      2.53
      0.074
      0.00
      0.000SND03365
      WD
      2550E
      172.20
      173.05
      2.71
      1.10
      3.61
      10.09
      0.294
      21.73
      0.634




Planned
Work Program - Fiscal 2004, Ending December 31, 2004

The
Company has proposed an exploration program for Fiscal 2004 to include further
diamond drilling on the Deep B shoot, the WD zone, the Bullion Creek zone and
the Siwash East area at a budgeted cost of $600,000.



The
ATW Prospect - Canada



This
diamond exploration prospect is without known reserves and all current work by
the Company on the prospect is exploratory in nature.



Option
to Acquire Interest

In
Fiscal 1992, these claims were acquired directly by staking and additional
claims were acquired from Michael Magrum by ATW Resources Ltd. ("ATW").
 The Company owns a 40% share interest in ATW along with Williams Creek
Explorations Limited-40% share interest and Troymin Resources Ltd.-20% share
interest (now Santoy Resources Ltd.). ATW acts as trustee and these companies
are the beneficiaries of a declaration of trust for their respective interest in
the prospect.In 1993 the property was optioned to
Kennecott Canada Exploration Inc. ("KCEI").  KCEI's interest reverted back
to ATW in 2001. ATW then completed a joint venture agreement with Aberex
Minerals Ltd.-15% property interest and SouthernEra Resources Limited-10%
property interest. A 2% gross overriding royalty on diamonds produced from TR
107 (a portion of the ATW property) is payable to KCEI. An option granted by the
Company, together with all other shareholders of ATW, to KCEI under an agreement
made as of November 30, 2001, to acquire a 40% share interest in ATW lapsed
unexercised.



Expenditure
to Date

During
Fiscal 2003, the Company's portion of exploration costs totalled $109,438
including a sonic drill program. Recoveries and administration fees for managing
the exploration program totalled $55,780. As at December 31, 2003, the Company
had deferred $171,461 in acquisition and exploration costs on the prospect.



Location
and Access

The
ATW property is located roughly equidistant between the Diavik and Snap Lake
diamond deposits, on MacKay Lake, Lac de Gras area, Northwest Territories.
 A winter road to the Diavik and Diamet diamond mines passes through the
property.



History
and Recent Work

Government
geological surveys, widely spaced airborne magnetic surveys and regional mineral
exploration programs were carried out in the property area before 1992.



In
the summer of 1992, ATW conducted limited a summer till sampling program for
diamond indicator minerals, and



28



---

contracted
an airborne magnetic - electromagnetic (EM) survey of the western half of the
property. After optioning the property, KCEI conducted several phases of
prospecting, till sampling using sonic and reverse circulation drills, ground
geophysical surveys, a small helicopter borne magnetic survey, and limited
diamond drilling in two programs that totaled 671metres. This work identified a
kilometres long train of diamond indicator minerals in glacial till that was
followed east under MacKay Lake. Their work also found one kimberlite body,
TR107, which contains no diamond indicator minerals, and therefore can not be
the source of the indicator mineral train being followed.



Subsequent
to the return of the property by KCEI, the joint venture group conducted an
airborne magnetic EM survey in 2001 over the five by five kilometre projected
source area of the diamond mineral indicator train. This was followed up by
ground geophysics which confirmed the presence of four anomalies found by the
airborne survey.



These
four targets were diamond drilled in the spring of 2002, but no kimberlite was
found.



In
early 2003, a sonic drill program of 77 holes was completed to further trace the
indicator mineral train previously found and to narrow down the possible source
area.



Geology
and Mineralization

The
property area is within the Slave Structural Province. This terrain was formed
in the late Archean with late diastrophism. The oldest known rocks appear to be
remobilized granitoids, emplaced in a thick volcano-sedimentary sequence. All of
these units were subsequently metamorphosed, deformed and also intruded by other
mainly granitoid bodies.



The
ATW claims overlay Yellowknife Supergroup rocks of the Slave Craton. These
Archean rocks consist of, metasediments (greywacke, pelite, minor quartzite,
conglomerate, iron formation, and metavolcanics). Some of these formations give
magnetic and electromagnetic responses. Large granitoid bodies intrude these
rocks. The Proterozoic MacKenzie dyke swarm dominates the airborne magnetics as
long continuous magnetic high responses that traverse the property.



Exploration
and Drilling Results

Exploration
work by KCEI between 1993 and 1998 identified a long diamond indicator mineral
train or anomaly in glacial till that extended southeasterly up glacial ice
direction.  Several geophysical targets were also identified from .
 In 1994, four geophysical targets were drilled, and one of these, TR-107
intersected a kimberlite body, that was not diamondiferous and did not contain
diamond indicator minerals. In January 1998, KCEI informed the Company that the
main exploration target on the property was the source of the prominent
indicator mineral till anomaly.  This anomaly contains indicator minerals
(garnets and chromites) with chemistry from within the diamond inclusion field
suggesting the source will be diamondiferous.  This indicator mineral
anomaly was been traced to the western edge of MacKay Lake.  Reverse
circulation (RC) drilling was carried out on the lake ice in early 1998 follow
the till anomaly easterly back up the original direction of glacial ice movement
towards the anticipated source location. Thirty-three holes for a total of 390
metres drilled at about 100 metre on three lines were completed to sample the
till on the lake bottom. The easterly line has four holes 100 metres apart that
had elevated counts pyrope garnets (>5) in the basal till, one of these had a
very high count of olivines (>50) with elevated values in three holes. The
work thus extended the indicator mineral train but no source area was delimited.
In 1999, a sonic drill used to sample the till in a fence of holes across the
ice movement direction and 13 holes for a total of 479 metres in a single line
were drilled about five kilometres up ice direction from the last previous line
of RC drill holes. These were essentially devoid of indicator minerals, and so
it was concluded that the source area had been narrowed down to a five kilometre
by five kilometre area, and that a potential source for the diamond indicator
minerals should be looked for between these two lines of holes.  Analyses
were done at KCEI's Thunder Bay laboratory, an ISO Guide 25 facility.



ATW's
1992 airborne survey did not cover this area, so a contract was given in March
2001 to Fugro Airborne Surveys to carry out a survey of the area between these
two lines of holes, and also over a small area in a bay of MacKay Lake further
down ice on the mineral train where a small magnetic low was outlined on an old
(1960s) government magnetic survey of the area.   This work outlined
two targets with pipe like characteristics and a long dike like structure that
is not magnetic indicating it is not caused by a diabase dike. Surface
geophysics confirmed the size and strength of the two pipe targets.



29



---



In
early 2002, results of microprobe analyses performed on indicator minerals from
sampling of the glacial dispersion train on the property were received by the
Company from Kennecott Canada Inc. Mineral Services Canada Inc. (Mineral
Services), a subsidiary of Mineral Services International, reviewed these
microprobe results.  The following is an excerpt from the summary of the
report provided from Mineral Services:



"A
prominent kimberlitic indicator dispersion has been traced up-ice in till
samples over a distance of 20 km, and was found by drill sampling to continue in
MacKay Lake sediments for a further 3 km, leading to geophysical target ATW-02.
The available kimberlitic indicator mineral analyses from this, the MacKay Lake
dispersion, comprises 74 olivines, 18 orthopyroxenes, 127 clinopyroxenes and 198
garnets, but no kimberlitic ilmenite or chromite. The compositional
characteristics of this indicator assemblage show it to be derived from
kimberlite source(s) that have entrained predominantly diamond-stable mantle
peridotite along a cold cratonic geotherm similar to that defined by garnet
peridotite xenoliths in the Diavik kimberlites. Various samples show this
indicator assemblage contains from 16 to 20% G10 garnets, with moderate-Cr2O3
G10 garnets well represented. Based on available data, and assuming that these
data are representative of the samples from which they are derived, the source
kimberlite(s) are predicted to be at least moderately diamond-bearing. A more
definitive assessment of their diamond potential cannot currently be made due to
the fact that: eclogitic garnet compositions are not reported; the extent to
which the available data are representative of the full  indicator mineral
population present in the tills and sediments or in specific source bodies is
not known; and several critical kimberlite-specific mineralization factors have
yet to be determined.



Kimberlitic
garnet, orthopyroxene and clinopyroxene recovered from a composite core sample
of the TR107 kimberlite reveal compositions quite unlike that seen in
exploration samples on the rest of the MacKay Lake property. The TR107
kimberlite apparently sampled essentially only graphite-stable mantle peridotite
on an elevated geothermal gradient. The kimberlite core sample is assigned zero
diamond potential and it manifestly does not correlate with the intrinsically
higher diamond potential of the vast majority of kimberlitic indicator minerals
recovered from the property."



In
April 2002 a program of drilling geophysical anomalies on the project was
completed.   No kimberlite was found.  Three resistivity low
anomalies were tested.  Two were explained by graphitic conductors.
 No explanation was found for the third anomaly.



In
early 2003, a till sampling program with seventy-seven holes were drilled to
recover samples of basal till samples on several lines of hole between the last
two lines of till sampling holes described above. This work narrowed down the
anticipated source area to a one kilometre by one kilometre square.



Planned
Work Program - Fiscal 2004, Ending December 31, 2004

The
Company has planned an exploration program for Fiscal 2004 consisting of a
gravity survey and ground magnetics and electromagnetics at a total cost of
$80,000.  The Company is responsible for 30% of this costs, or $24,000.



The
Caballo Blanco Prospect - Mexico



The
Caballo Blanco Prospect is without known reserves and all current work by the
Company on the prospect is exploratory in nature.



Option
to Acquire Interest

In
1996, the Company signed an option to purchase agreement with two private
Mexican individuals for the approximately 40,000 acre property. In terms of the
agreement, to earn a 60% in the property, the Company had to issue a total of
200,000 shares and pay US$500,000 plus value added tax over four and a half
years. To earn the remaining 40% interest, the Company had to pay an additional
US$500,000 plus value added within a year of earning its 60% interest, plus a
2.5% NSR from any production. The Company could have reduced this NSR to 1.5%
for a fixed payment of US$2,000,000 plus value added tax payable equally over 10
years.



The
agreement was amended in January 2003. To earn a 100% interest, the Company must
issue a total of 200,000 shares of its stock and pay US$668,500 plus value added
tax by February 26, 2007. The underlying owner would also receive a NSR of 2.5%
to 1% based on the rate of production. The Company can purchase 50% of this NSR
for



30



---

a
fixed payment of US$750,000 plus value added tax.



In
January 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with Comaplex Minerals Corp.
("Comaplex"). To earn a 60% interest, Comaplex must keep the property in good
standing and incur exploration expenditures totalling US$2,000,000 by January
16, 2007.



Expenditures
to Date

To
December 31, 2003, the Company had incurred a total of $2,522,756 in acquisition
and exploration costs on this prospect but during Fiscal 2002 the prospect was
written-down by $2,000,000. As at December 31, 2003, the Company had deferred
costs of $522,756 on this prospect.



Location
and Access

The
Caballo Blanco project, consisting of mineral concessions, currently comprising
about 8,200 hectares, is located in the state of Veracruz about 75 kilometres
northwest along the Pan American highway in eastern Mexico from the city of
Veracruz.



History
and Recent Work

The
area was staked in 1993 as a new discovery. The Company carried out limited
exploration on the property in 1995 with mixed results, and subsequently
provided the owner with funding to continue prospecting under a "grubstake"
agreement. Further mineralization was found and an option agreement was
negotiated. Since 1996, the Company's efforts have focussed on three distinct
areas of alteration and mineralisation known as the Central Grid Zone, Highway
Zone and Northern Zone respectively. Most of the work to date has been carried
out on the Central Grid and Highway zones, where separate porphyry systems have
been identified. Geological mapping, sampling, geochemical surveys, magnetic and
induced polarization (IP) geophysical surveys were carried out, mostly in 1997.
 A 2,390 metre reverse circulation drill program was carried out by the
Company in 1998 on the Central Grid Zone. This drilling intersected both
porphyry-style copper-gold mineralization and high-grade gold-silver
mineralization in veins apparently spatially peripheral to the porphyry system.
In the Highway Zone, soil geochemistry, geologic mapping, and induced
polarisation geophysical surveys have identified a separate porphyry copper-gold
target. The Northern Zone is a large area of argillic alteration, within which
preliminary prospecting and geochemical surveys have identified areas of
elevated gold-copper-arsenic in silcified rock. Highly anomalous values have
been found in stream silt samples and boulders in streams, and this area is
thought to represent a large unexplored high-sulphidation gold system. In 1999,
2000, and early 2001, the Company carried out limited geological, geochemical,
and IP surveys. Late in 2000, the Company purchased exploration data and
surrounding claims from Lucero Resources Corp.  The Company also purchased
a small net smelter return royalty on these claims for $1,000 Canadian dollars
from Lucero's successor in early 2003.



In
Fiscal 2001, the Company's subsidiary, Minera Gavilan, S.A. de C.V., signed an
agreement with Noranda Exploracion Mexico S.A de C.V. ("Noranda"), a subsidiary
of Noranda Inc., which was terminated in Fiscal 2002. Noranda carried out
geological mapping, some regional geochemical surveying and diamond drilling.
Starting in March 2002, Noranda completed 1789 metres of drilling in seven holes
four in the Central Grid area, and three into the Highway Zone area, aimed at
porphyry copper targets. At the Company's expense, two short holes were drilled
to test a gold target in the Central Grid part of the property.



Work
during 2003 at the Highway and Northern zones consisted of sampling, geologic
mapping and induced polarization (IP) geophysics and was complimented by
analysis of alteration mineralogy with a PIMA portable infrared spectrometer.



Geology
and Mineralization

The
property occurs in a caldera setting in volcanic rocks of Miocene age, along the
northeastern edge of the Trans- Mexican Volcanic Belt.  It covers a large
hydrothermal system that indicates both porphyry Cu-Au, high sulfidation Au and
low sulfidation Au-Ag style mineralization.  Mineralogical evidence
indicates that minimal erosion has taken place and the hydrothermal system is
mainly preserved.  It is a new discovery, first identified by sampling in
acid sulphate altered quartz stockwork veining, in a road cut for the main
coastal highway.  This zone yielded anomalous gold values.



Exploration
Results



31



---



A
geochemical soil survey on a grid that covers roughly 3 kilometers by 3
kilometers in the Central Grid area of the property outlined a number of
coincident gold-copper anomalies associated with what appears to be two styles
of mineralization within a very large alteration zone. In one area, two creeks
contain float rock of porphyry style quartz stockwork veining associated with
copper-gold mineralization and K-silicate alteration. In a geochemical soil
anomaly over this location, the 200 parts per million copper contour outlines an
area roughly 700 meters by 500 meters, with coincident anomalous gold values.
 The other style of mineralization, gold-silver-copper-lead quartz
stockwork and quartz barite veins, is found in several areas.  One such
area has an irregular shaped soil anomaly that is roughly 700 metres by 200
metres with up 2.89 gm/t gold and up to 0.22% copper.  The highest gold
value in the soil survey was 9.96 gm/t from a small isolated high.



Geological
mapping found that the anomalous gold values are closely associated with areas
of widespread k-silicate alteration and copper staining.  The geochemical
grid was extended northwards to cover possible extensions to the known highly
anomalous values.



An
induced polarization and ground magnetic geophysical program over the Central
Grid area identified a very broad zone of elevated chargeability enveloping
several intense chargeability highs.  These chargeability highs are linear
in orientation, and are over one km long.  Profiles indicate these
anomalies extend from surface to significant depths.  These linear highs
relate spatially to the presence of outcrop and float of quartz-barite-sulfide
veining and associated gold soil geochemistry.



A
2,390 meter reverse circulation drill program started in April and was completed
in May 1998.



Holes
CB-1 and CB-2 were drilled in the porphyry-copper-gold style target.



Hole
CB-1 (located at 5100E and 3400N, drilling east at -60o, 167.6m deep)
intersected a mineralized feldspar porphyry cut by quartz stockwork veining.
 Chalcopyrite, pyrite and magnetite occur as coatings on fractures and in
disseminated form.  Bornite is sparsely disseminated. Anomalous results
are: from 3m to 167.6m (164.6m) of 0.15% Cu and 0.223 grams/tonne Au, including
from 3m to 110m (107m) of 0.18% Cu and 0.254 grams/tonne Au.



Hole
CB-2 (located at 5295E and 3400N, drilling west at -50o, 193.5m deep)
was similar to hole CB-1 but sections of the porphyry are more highly clay
altered with quartz stockwork veining containing pyrite chalcopyrite, minor
galena and sphalerite.  Anomalous results are: from 26m to 193.5m (167.5m)
of 0.09% Cu and 0.159 grams/tonne Au, including 96m to 108.2m (12.2m) of 0.13%
Cu and 0.322 grams/tonne Au; from 153.9m to 193.5m (39.6m) of 0.15% Cu and 0.394
grams/tonne Au; and the last sample 192m to 193.5m (1.5m) of 0.23% Cu and 0.720
grams/tonne Au.



IP
geophysical and soil geochemical anomalies were targeted with the drilling over
a roughly 1 by 2.2 kilometer area within this 150 square kilometer property.
 The water table was consistently intersected at shallow depths.  The
water flow encountered in many holes limited the practical depth of drilling
with the drilling system employed.  Future reverse circulation drilling
could achieve better penetration depths and rates with equipment designed for
higher water flow.



An
involved quality control program was employed for the project and included the
insertion of blanks, standards and duplicates into the sample stream. Samples
were submitted blind to Bondar Clegg/ITS labs of North Vancouver for analysis.
Industry standard methods of analysis were employed.



Hole
CB-3 was collared into a ground magnetic high at 5545 meters east on line 3295N.
 The hole, drilling west at -50o, passed through 10.7 metres of
overburden before intersecting andesite which continued to 153.9 metres, the end
of the hole. The andesite is highly altered to hydrothermal magnetite, epidote,
chlorite and pyrite. Magnetite and epidote occur as veins and clots throughout
the andesite. This style of alteration is similar to magnetite-epidote skarning
developed in volcanics adjacent to porphyry Cu-Au deposits elsewhere. Several
gold values over 1.52 meter sample widths were elevated with a high of 0.774
grams/tonne Au. This hole was drilled across the assumed dip of the skarned zone
and did not penetrate through to an expected andesite/intrusive contact.

Hole
CB-4 (collared at 5600 East on line 3524N; drilling east at -50o)
passed through 16.8 metres of overburden



32



---

before
penetrating the same andesite to the end of the hole. The andesite is skarned as
in hole CB-3, however at depth in the hole silicification, clay alteration and
pyrite associated with quartz-sulfide veining were intersected. Several zones
contained anomalous assay results.



Results
in Hole CB-4 included 39.62 meters from 96.01m to 135.63 meters that averaged
0.25g/t gold and about 1.0 g/t Ag with 0.15% Cu and 0.10% Pb and 0.18% Zn.
 This interval included a higher grade section from 96.01 meters to 108.20
meters totaling 12.19 meters averaging 3.8 g/t Au, 23 (g/t) Ag, 0.37% Cu, 0.19%
Pb and 0.34% Zn.  This section relates to strong veining and included a
high of 19.9 g/t Au and 26 g/t Ag over 1.52 meters from 102.1 to 103.63 meters.
 A further zone of mineralization and veining was intersected from 123.4 to
126.5 meters over 3.10 meters of 1.7 g/t Au, 14 g/t Ag, and 0.11% Cu, 0.21% Pb
and 0.35% Zn.



Holes
CB-5 and CB-6 were drilled further south on line 2000 N at 5760 E and 5600 E
respectively. CB-5 was drilled to the west at -50o and CB-6 was
drilled east at -50o.  Both holes collared in similarly altered
andesite but at shallow depths penetrated a highly silicified, clay altered and
pyritized feldspar porphyry. The porphyry is cross-cut by narrow, dark
quartz-pyrite-chalcopyrite veinlets.



Intersections
in CB-5 included a 13.72 meters zone of veining, from 21.33 meters to 35.05
meters of 1.8 g/t Au, 31 g/t Ag and 0.10% Cu.  A second zone was
intersected 48.77 meters from 54.86 to 103.63 meters averaging 0.241 g/t Au and
0.06% Cu.  Included in this section is a 19.81 meter zone from 83.82 to
103.63 meters averaging 0.446 g/t Au and 0.11% Cu.



CB-6
intersected similar porphyry style mineralization over 67.05 meters from 35.05
meters to 102.1 meters averaging 0.188 g/t Au and 0.05% Cu.  This includes
a 13.72 meter section from 35.05 to 48.77 meters averaging 0.361 g/t Au and
0.09% Cu.



The
results from holes CB-5 and CB-6 indicate that porphyry Au-Cu mineralization
exists over 1.4 kilometres to the south of the previously released holes, CB-1
and CB-2. The mineralization is associated with the highly altered feldspar
porphyry, an entirely different intrusive rock from that intersected in CB-1 and
CB-2.



The
remaining holes returned lower but still anomalous gold and copper values.



Fluid
inclusion work on drill cuttings from the reverse circulation drilling program
in the main grid, identified three stages of quartz with several types of
inclusions.  The early and late stages of quartz and the inclusion
characteristics are diagnostic of a classic copper-gold-porphyry system.
 The intermediate banded quartz is common only in the shallow porphyry
systems of the Maricunga Au belt.



Geological
mapping, line cutting and geochemical soil sampling on the Highway Zone extended
the gold in soils anomaly to cover an area 2 kilometres long, and up to 400
metres wide.  Geological mapping and prospecting of this area has found
extensive vuggy silica in float and some outcrops in an area of widespread deep
weathering and overburden.  The best outcrop sample so far from within the
gold in soils anomaly is 1.1 grams/ton gold.

On
the Northern Zone, work consisting of further geochemical stream silt sampling
to find the source of anomalous gold values in drainages that contained float
with multigram gold values in vuggy silica and breccia.  The stream silt
sampling and follow up geological mapping and prospecting isolated an area of
extensive large angular boulders of vuggy silica and subcrop with anomalous gold
values.



In
order to test the Central Grid and Highway Zone porphyry targets, Noranda
drilled 1,789 meters in seven holes. Four were drilled in the Central Grid
looking for the extension of the outcropping copper bearing porphyry and three
holes were drilled into the previously undrilled Highway Zone. The report
summary states "Despite pervasive K-spar flooding potassic alteration associated
with the porphyry in the Central Grid and the huge argillic alteration zone that
occurs at the Highway Zone, significant copper mineralization was not found."
 Noranda states the presence of an important gold deposit in the Central
Grid area has not been ruled out but possibilities for an open pittable copper
porphyry have been reduced.  On the Highway Zone, very low values of copper
were found but drilling did intersect short intervals of elevated gold.
 Hole CB-02-07, Noranda's last hole, which was drilled in an area of
extensive argillic alteration associated with elevated gold in soil geochemistry
had several interesting gold intersections. These included stockwork veining
from 51.35 to 84 meters depth within which a 6 meter section averaged 1.42 g/t
gold. A



33



---

sample
from 192 to 195 meters depth within a zone of argillic alteration averaged 2.5
g/t gold and the final sample of the hole from 212.0 to 212.5 meters depth
returned a gold value of 4.98 g/t gold. The hole was lost at this point due to
poor drilling conditions.



Two
further holes were attempted at the Company's expense at the end of Noranda's
program, under the supervision of an independent consultant. These were located
near reverse circulation Hole CB98-04, from the Almaden's 1998 program, which
intersected 12.2 meters of 3.8 grams of gold per tonne. Hole CB-02-08 was
drilled east at -50o, parallel to and about thirty metres south of
hole 98-4. It intersected fault gouge in the area where the vein was expected.
 Hole CB-02-09 was located ninety meters north of CB 98-04 and also aimed
east at -50o. This hole intersected a mineralized vein zone from 57.3
to 60.0 meters, and from 69.0 meters to 73.0 meters the recovered material
contained fragments of quartz vein material that is mineralized with
chalcopyrite, galena, and pyrite. The hole was abandoned in bad ground at 73.0
meters, which is a few metres before the expected location of the zone found in
hole CB 98-04.



Comaplex's
2003 program on the Highway zone outlined several prominent areas of alteration
and mineralisation. A significant resistivity and chargeability anomaly has
resulted from this work over a roughly 5 by 3 kilometer area of acid sulphate
alteration characterised by hypogene alunite and vuggy silica. The alteration
mineralogy and geologic textures recognised suggest that area of study
represents a large high-sulphidation epithermal system. The zones of vuggy
silica and coincident chargeability and resistivity have not been drilled,
however a diamond drill hole was completed close to the area by Noranda Inc. in
2001. This hole was drilled in an area of extensive argillic alteration and had
several interesting gold intersections. The hole was lost due to poor drilling
conditions.



At
the Northern zone sampling, geologic mapping and PIMA analyses have defined a
huge, roughly 6 by 5 kilometer area of acid sulphate alteration and vuggy
silica, including many breccia bodies. Past sampling in these areas by Almaden
has returned anomalous gold values, the highest being 11 g/t. The alteration in
the Northern zone is very similar to that in the Highway zone, however up until
this program very little work had been carried out in this area. Initial
sampling by Comaplex returned anomalous gold values from outcrop the highest
being 1 g/t. Outcrop in this area includes breccia bodies containing clasts of
vuggy silica. An IP section over the zone outlined a large high resistivity
feature that appears to extend to depth.



Planned
Work Program - Fiscal 2004, Ending December 31, 2004

The
Company has no planned exploration program for Fiscal 2004 with all work being
conducted by Comaplex Minerals Corp. who are working to earn their interest in
the prospect.



In
March 2004 Comaplex informed Almaden that road building to access drill targets
was underway but construction was slow.  A diamond drill had been mobilised
to the prospect but drilling had not yet commenced.



The
Yago/La Sarda Prospects - Mexico



The
Yago/La Sarda prospect is without known reserves and all current work by the
Company on the prospect is exploratory in nature.



Option
to Acquire Interest

In
Fiscal 1997 the Company's subsidiary, Minera Gavilan, S.A. de C.V., completed
the assembly, from several Mexican individuals, of claims covering a large
epithermal gold target near Yago, Nayarit, Mexico. The claims under option
consisted of the Guadalupe, Sagitario and Yago claims.  To earn a 100%
interest in the Guadalupe claim, the Company had to pay US$30,000 plus value
added tax over six years (amended).  To earn a 100% interest in the
Sagitario claim, the Company had to pay US$250,000 plus value added tax by
January 1, 2005 (amended).  There is a 2% NSR to only one owner on any
production from his property.  In Fiscal 2000 the Company terminated its
option on the Yago 1 to Yago 7 claims to reduce property payments.  The
Tepic claim was acquired directly by staking, reduced in size and then partially
restaked in 2002 at the request of an optionee.  Only a reduced portion of
this ground is still held.



In
Fiscal 1999 the Company entered into an agreement to acquire a 100% interest in
8 mining concessions which comprise the adjoining La Sarda mine and surrounding
property for payments totalling US$2,000,000 plus value added tax over four
years, as well as improvements, a 300 tpd mill and equipment located within the
mining



34



---

concessions.
 If the mill was not included when the option was exercised in full, the
purchase price would have been reduced by US$200,000.  In Fiscal 2000, the
Company purchased this prospect outright for US$110,000 plus value-added tax,
not including the mill.



In
Fiscal 2002, the Company optioned the project to Ascot Resources Ltd. ("Ascot").
 Under the terms of the agreement, to earn an initial 50% interest Ascot
had to issue 300,000 shares to the Company and incur exploration expenditures of
US$1,000,000 within two years.  Ascot was committed to issue 200,000 shares
and incur US$400,000 of exploration expenditures in the first year. At Ascot's
request and expense, several of the previously dropped Yago claims were
re-optioned and became part of the mutual area of interest under terms of the
Ascot-Almaden Agreement. Ascot could have increased its interest to 60% by
issuing an additional 300,000 shares to the Company and incurring additional
exploration expenditures totaling US$1,000,000.  Ascot relinquished their
option in Fiscal 2003.



During
Fiscal 2003, the Company advised the owner of the Sagitario claim that it was
relinquishing its option on that claim. Subsequent to the end of Fiscal 2003,
the Company acquired the Sagitario and Guadalupe claims by outright purchase for
US$10,000 each plus value added tax.  The Company also completed
documentation for the purchase of the Don Alonzo claim.



Expenditures
to Date

During
Fiscal 2003, the Company incurred $22,325 in exploration costs on this prospect,
net of recoveries, primarily on the payment of Mexican mining taxes and duties
to keep the property in good standing.  As at December 31, 2003, the
Company had deferred acquisition and explorations costs of $799,505, net of
write-downs, on the property.



Location
and Access

The
Yago/La Sarda prospects are located in the state of Nayarit, on the Pacific
Coast of Mexico.  The claims encompass the town of Yago, which is located
by paved road approximately seven kilometers from Highway 15, which is the major
thoroughfare from the United States to Mexico.  Yago is located roughly 50
kilometers north of Tepic, the capital of Nayarit.



History
and Recent Work

Southern
Part:

The
assembled claims cover a large alteration zone centered on a northwest trending
extensional structure with numerous separate gold veins, many of which had had
historic small scale mining operations from numerous old workings.  It is
believed that this was the first time in many years that all these claims had
been assembled into a single property.  The separate owners each controlled
a part of the main area of interest in the southern part of the property which
is a large stockwork zone of chalcedonic banded quartz veins where small scale
mining was carried out.  Wider veins within the stockwork zone were mined
by underground open stopes accessed by adits and by glory holes mined out to
surface.



In
1997, soil sampling and geological mapping were carried out on a grid over the
southern area of interest. Numerous rock samples were also taken at this time.
Encouraging results were followed up by expanding the grid and detailed in fill
soil sampling in areas of interest.



In
fiscal 1998, the Company optioned the property to Santoy Resources Ltd. ("Santoy")
who conducted a 975.2 metre drill program late in the year. Results did not meet
their expectations and Santoy dropped their option in July 1999.



During
November and December 1999 a program of mapping, sampling and road building was
carried out on the project. Work was focussed on the Guadalupe-Tejona-Korina
vein system in the southern portion of the project. Samples of ore from recent
development and production blasts were also taken from the La Sarda area active
operations, roughly seven kilometres north. The La Sarda Prospect had been in
continuous production for about 5 years and mining during the option period was
to be for the benefit of the current owner but restricted to 150 tonnes per day
maximum and to material above the lowest level of workings on the La Sarda vein
which is roughly 100 metres below the surface.  Mining operations ceased in
early 2000.



35



---



In
March 2000, the Company and its predecessor ("Fairfield") entered into an
agreement where Fairfield could earn 51% of the Company's interests and rights
to the prospect. Fairfield drilled two holes on the southern part of the
property with discouraging results, and completed the acquisition of the
northern part of the property.



In
2002, the Company optioned the property to Ascot. The optionee carried out
further sampling, geological mapping, induced polarization geophysical surveys
and limited diamond drilling.  Ascot dropped their option in 2003.



Northern
Part:

In
this area, the thrust of the Company's exploration effort was to find new,
larger zones of high grade material at greater depths on both the La Sarda and
parallel vein zones.



In
December 1999 some mapping was carried out on the La Sarda vein. Because the
mine and mill were operating without established reserves, production and grade
were somewhat erratic.  The La Sarda vein had provided most of the
production over the previous four or five years.  This vein was found by
mapping to be just underneath the opaline silica horizon, further indication
that only the top portion of this extensive system is exposed.



The
La Sarda area active workings were inspected. Four major sub parallel vein
systems have been recognized in this area, and three were being actively worked
at that time. High grade ore was reported in the active faces of the La
Cucaracha vein workings. A sample taken from muck from an ore face returned
values of 20.2 grams/tonne Au and 151 grams/tonne silver.



Geology
and Mineralization

The
assembled claims cover a large alteration zone centered on a northwest trending
extensional structure with numerous separate gold veins.



The
country rocks in the area are Tertiary andesitic tuffs and flows that are
observed to be flat-lying.  The alteration zone is characterized by
strataform silicification spatially associated with friable argillic alteration
dominated by kaolinite with subordinate alunite and cristobalite.



This
alteration zone is interpreted to represent the paleowater table of a
shallowly-eroded epithermal system.  Gold-bearing quartz veins with
prominent crustiform, colloform banding and stockwork quartz veining, are
exposed beneath the strataform alteration and are the target of the exploration
efforts.



Infrastructure

A
main railway line crosses the prospect and there are electric powerlines to the
town of Yago.  The prospect is approximately seven kilometeres from Highway
15 and is traversed by numerous gravel roads.



Exploration
Results

Southern
Part:

In
1997, a 1 by 1 kilometer grid was cut over the area of intense quartz-adularia
veining and float and a soil sampling program was carried out at 50 meter
spacing on lines 100 metres apart.  Several large multi-line
gold-silver-antimony anomalies resulted that extended to the edge of the grid.
 A follow-up survey was carried out in which the grid was expanded to
roughly 1.5 by 2 kilometers.  Samples were taken intermediate to anomalous
samples taken in the initial program to provide greater detail and to serve as a
check on previous sampling.  Sampling was also carried out to define the
extent of anomalies discovered in the first phase of sampling.  The in fill
sampling confirmed the results of the previous survey while the additional soil
sampling provided better definition of the existing anomalies and resulted in
new anomalies which still remain open.  This anomaly lies in the central
and south-west part of the grid in an area devoid of old workings and remains
open in two directions.  Veins mapped in this area strike roughly 10
degrees east of north.  Emanating from the north-east part of this anomaly
is a linear gold-silver-antimony soil anomaly trending approximately 40 degrees
east of north.  The trend coincides with the attitudes of veins measured in
outcrop in the north-east portion of the grid. Several other multi-line gold in
soil anomalies resulted from the soil sampling.  Antimony and silver for
the most part correlate well with gold geochemistry, defining similar trends
throughout the grid.



36



---





At
the time of soil sampling more than sixty rock samples were taken over the
property.  These samples were taken from exposures in historic workings and
the associated dumps as well as the vein float prevalent over the property.
  Fifteen samples were taken from one area of more abundant outcrop
about 100 metres by 16 metres and here gold grades were as high as 5.72 grams
per tonne gold and averaged 1.9 gram/tonne gold.  Conventional Fire Assay
and ICP techniques were employed on both rock and soil samples.



Several
areas of intense banded quartz-adularia veining, stockwork veining and one area
of hydrothermal brecciation and silicification were defined which are coincident
with areas of anomalous soil geochemistry.  The initial geologic data
indicates that the veining represents high elevations within a shallowly eroded
low-sulfidation epithermal system, of which the paleo-water table is preserved
over much of the property. Exploration was designed to seek bonanza vein type
mineralization.



Geologic
work and road building in the southern Guadalupe-Tejona-Korina area was designed
to provide access and investigate areas for future diamond drilling. During the
course of this work several new veins and previously unknown historic workings
were discovered. In the La Korina area (on the Sagitario claim), the lowest
elevation workings, several shafts and adits were discovered in heavy
undergrowth. The work completed has enabled the Company to select several sites
for drilling in this area. Several banded quartz-adularia veins were discovered
in the new road cuts within areas of high gold in soil geochemistry. In one area
banded veining was discovered in an area of very high gold soil geochemistry
along the La Guadalupe vein trend over 500 metres from known historic workings.
A sample of banded veining from this area returned values of 5.5 grams/tonne
gold and 110 grams/tonne silver. These areas and the Korina area were not tested
by past drilling and are relatively lower in elevation than the depth tested by
past drilling.



This
program of work resulted in the definition of several key drill hole locations
in the southern Guadalupe-Tejona-Korina area. These locations would test the
correct elevations for potential bonanza grades at depth along the strike and
intersection of several banded quartz-adularia veins. Road building provided
access for these holes. Drill holes were also been designed to test the La Sarda
area vein systems to the north including the Cucaracha vein.



Numerous
small scale old workings are present on the property.



Hydrothermal
alteration mapping and fluid inclusion studies support the conclusion that the
present erosion surface represents shallow depths beneath the paleo-water table
of the hydrothermal system. The potential for high-grade gold-silver
mineralization is expected to extend from surface to significant depths beneath
the present surface.



In
December 1998, seven (7) widely spaced holes totaling 975.2 metres were
completed by Santoy to test epithermal vein targets at depth.  Widespread
quartz veining and stockwork systems were encountered at depth, many of which
correlated well with surface zones.



Widespread
anomalous gold, silver and base metal values were obtained from the drilling
with the most significant mineralized intervals as follows:



37



---



Hole
        No.
      From
        - To (m)
      Interval
        (m)
      Au
        (g/t)
      Ag
        (g/t)98-01
        (Tejona
        Vein)
      53.3
        to 54.8
      1.5
      0.37
      24.998-02
        (Guadalupe
        Vein)
      44.2
        to 47.2
        67.0
        to 70.1
        121.9
        to 126.4
      3.0
        3.1
        4.5
      0.44
        0.51
        0.54
      43.8
        15.1
        16.798-03
        (between
        Creek & Tejona)
      38.1
        to 54.8
        incl.38.1
        to 39.6
      16.7
        1.5
      0.15
        0.63
      22.6
        99.898-04
        (La
        Morraya)
      42.6
        to 44.2
      1.6
      0.32
      35.798-05
      198.1
        to 201.1
      3
      1.8
      0.998-06
        (Creek
        Zone)
      32.0
        to 36.5
      4.5
      0.13
      9.498-07
      No
        significant values




The
sample with the highest gold grade from Santoy's drill program was re-assayed by
the Company for metallic content, a fire assay procedure commonly used when
coarse gold is suspected. The grade of this sample increased from 3.0 grams/tonne
to 3.8 grams/tonne, which is interpreted to represent the presence of coarse
gold. In these circumstances diamond drilling is generally considered the best
drilling method to ensure the recovery of coarse gold. These values are
interpreted to be typical of the level of exposure of the veins tested and
support the interpretation that potential ore shoots might exist at greater
depth than cut with these reverse circulation drill holes.



In
July 2000, Fairfield began a diamond drilling program on the southern part of
the property. Progress was very poor.  Drilling commenced with two holes on
the Guadalupe vein that would be the most difficult to access if the rainy
season were to start early.  Hole one did not reach its objective and the
core barrel was lost in the hole.  After much difficulty, hole two was
completed to the planned depth.  However, the drill rods became stuck when
pulling out of the hole, and they are still stuck.   Fairfield brought
a drilling expert to the project to identify the problems, which he determined
not to be related to ground or any local conditions.  The program was
terminated.  Although the first hole did not reach its targeted vein,
another vein was intersected. The projected vein in hole two was also
intersected where expected.  No significant assays were returned from these
holes.



In
2002, Ascot completed a gradient array IP (induced polarization) geophysics
survey on the La Sarda and Yago grids.  The two large geophysical grids
covered three of four principal veins in the La Sarda mine area, and the
Guadalupe, La Tejona and La Korina vein systems in the Yago area to the south.



At
La Sarda the three northeast-striking veins surveyed to date were mapped very
effectively by gradient array IP and traced approximately 200 metres beyond
their last known exposures.  The data suggest that all three vein
structures remain well defined over a strike length of 900 metres and are open
for extension to the northeast.  In the Yago area, south of La Sarda, the
IP data appear more complex.  On the west side of the grid geophysics
traced the north-south striking Guadalupe vein over a distance of approximately
400 metres and defined a large area of very high resistivity corresponding to
the La Tejona and La Korina vein structures.



A
total of 1098.2 metres of diamond drilling was completed on the La Sarda vein by
Ascot, one hole was lost before reaching the vein target, another hole had lost
core through the section where the vein intersection was expected, and the
remaining four had low grade values that nevertheless showed good vein width and
continuity.



38



---





Planned
Work Program - Fiscal 2004, Ending December 31, 2004

The
Company has no planned exploration program for Fiscal 2004. The Company
considers the Yago/La Sarda  prospect to be a considerable asset with
potential for a high-grade gold vein deposit. The next step in the exploration
process is an aggressive program of diamond drilling designed to develop a
high-grade resource. The Company will maintain the property and seek to
consolidate its interest in the area by acquiring further claims that may become
available in the area.  The project will be presented to potential joint
venture partners.



The
Galeana Prospect- Mexico



The
Galeana prospect is without known reserves and all current work by the Company
is exploratory in nature.



Option
to acquire interest

Pursuant
to an agreement dated February 22, 2001, the Company's predecessor ("Fairfield")
acquired an option to earn a 100% interest in the Galeana claim group from a
Mexican individual. To earn a 100% interest, the Company must pay US$100,000
plus value added tax over seven years. The Company must also pay US$400,000 plus
value added tax should the property go into production. The claims are subject
to a NSR of 3% to 1% based on the rate of production. The Company can purchase
50% of this NSR for a fixed payment of US$500,000 plus value added tax at any
time.



During
2002, the Company entered into an agreement with Grid Capital Corporation ("Grid").
To earn an initial 50% interest, Grid must maintain the property in good
standing, incur exploration expenditures totalling US$1,000,000 and issue
400,000 shares to the Company by July 31, 2006. Grid can increase its interest
to 60% by incurring an additional US$1,000,000 of exploration expenditures and
issuing a further 100,000 shares to the Company by July 31, 2007.



Expenditures
to date

As
at December 31, 2003, the Company had incurred $118,272 in acquisition and
exploration costs on the prospect.



Location
and Access

The
Galeana project is centred on the village of Galeana, located roughly 22
kilometers by all season gravel road south of the town of Guadalupe y Calvo in
Chihuahua State, Mexico. Guadalupe y Calvo is connected by paved highway to
Parral, a major commercial and mining supply centre.



History
and Recent Work

The
property covers two major vein systems, the Miguel Ahumada - Estrella de Oro
trend and the San Geronimo trend, both of which have had limited historic
production. Production took place from 1889 to 1910, and it is estimated from
historic reports that up to 100,000 ounces may have been extracted from vein
material averaging 0.6 ounces per ton (opt) Au. The mines were closed in 1910,
prior to the Mexican revolution. Several comprehensive evaluations of the
deposits were carried out between 1902 and 1923 and are in the possession of
Almaden. Apart from small scale activities by local miners, the property sat
idle until 1996, at which time the present owner acquired it. In 1997 the
property was optioned to Duran Gold Corp. ("Duran") of Vancouver, Canada. Duran
was a private company and optioned the property with the intention of making an
initial public offering based on the Galeana property as a principal asset.
Duran mapped and sampled all the accessible historic workings and made
preparations for a diamond drill program to test the known ore shoots to depths
beneath and along strike from the historic stoping. In 1999, Duran was unable to
raise the funds necessary to carry out the proposed exploration, and as a
result, Duran terminated their option on the Galeana property.



In
2002, the Company carried out a limited program of geologic and alteration
mapping.



In
April 2003, Grid carried out an exploration program that consisted of geological
mapping, rock and soil geochemical sampling and Induced Polarization geophysics.

At
the Miguel Ahumada zone, Grid has reported that fault breccia, epithermal quartz
veining and quartz vein breccia, has been traced for over 500 meters. The zone,
where exposed by a number of open cuts, pits and adits, varies from



39



---

1
meter to more than 3 meters in thickness. Four grab samples of banded quartz
vein clasts from a breccia were taken by Grid in the Ahumada adit. Four surface
samples of quartz float were taken by Grid 150 meters to the northeast of the
eastern-most opening. Two anomalous soil samples taken 150 meters to the north
of the above-mentioned high-grade quartz float, indicate the presence of an
undiscovered auriferous vein and represent a high priority target for follow-up
work. Along strike to the southwest of the Ahumada zone, results of soil
sampling and quartz vein float sampling has extended the zone 200 meters and
indicates the zone is open to the southwest. I.P. surveys carried out over the
four lines crossing the Ahumada trend suggest that several parallel veins may be
present. One kilometre north of the Ahumada zone, the Falda Norde structure
sampling by Grid returned anomalous to highly anomalous gold values from rock
and soils over a 800 meter strike length. The best results were returned from a
chip sample taken in the Falda Norde adit across a zone of banded limonitic
epithermal veining, vein breccia and clay gouge.



Mapping
of alteration mineralogy in the Galeana area, petrographic analysis of quartz
vein textures, fluid inclusion microthermometry and the low silver to gold
ratios of veins sampled, all support the interpretation that the exposed veins
represent a high level within the original hydrothermal system. This
interpretation coupled with the identification of high gold grades in fragments
found in breccia bodies identified on the property, suggest that the potential
to identify high grade gold and silver ore shoots in the veins may increase with
depth.



Geology
and Mineralization

The
property covers two major vein systems, the Miguel Ahumada - Estrella de Oro
trend and the San Geronimo trend, both of which have had limited historic gold
production. Both vein systems represent classic banded quartz-adularia-carbonate
low sulphidation epithermal veins. The veins are exposed in dominantly andesitic
flows of the upper part of the Lower Volcanic Sequence of the Sierra madre
Occidental volcanic province although alteration and veining continue into the
lower part of the Upper Volcanic Sequence. Ignimbrites of the Upper Volcanic
sequence have been observed at higher elevations on the property.



Drilling
Results

In
April 2004 Grid reported that recent prospecting has encountered gold-silver
mineralization in epithermal quartz-carbonate float found in the area of the
Estrella de Oro vein structure. The area is located two kilometers to the south
along the projected strike extent of the Ahumada zone.



A
diamond drill program initiated in February 2004 was suspended while road access
was completed to the primary drill target, the Ahumada zone, which has not yet
been drilled. Initial drill testing with three diamond drill holes on a
secondary target, the Falda Norte Zone, was completed. The drill holes did not
intersect the down-dip projection of the Falda Norte structure due to
postmineral diking and faulting. The drilling did not provide a conclusive test
of the Falda Norte vein structure and continuing geological interpretation of
the initial drill results will determine if further drill testing is warranted.
Drill testing of the Ahumada zone will commence as soon as a drill can be
mobilized.



Planned
Work Program for Fiscal 2004, ending December 31, 2004

The
Company has no planned exploration program for Fiscal 2004 with all work being
conducted by Grid who are working to earn their interest in the prospect.
 Grid
has advised that it is planning  a more
 detailed prospecting and mapping program expected to commence shortly in the
area of the Estrella de Oro vein structure and drill testing of the Ahumada zone
will commence as soon as a drill can be mobilized.



The
El Pulpo Prospect - Mexico



The
El Pulpo Prospect is without known reserves and all current work by the Company
on the prospect is exploratory in nature.



Option
to Acquire Interest

The
Company's subsidiary acquired a 100% interest in the Gavilan claims by staking
in December 2001.

In
April 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with Ross River Minerals Ltd.
("Ross River"). To earn an initial 50.1% interest, Ross River must maintain the
property in good standing, incur exploration expenditures totalling US$2,000,000
and issue 425,000 shares to the Company by April 30, 2008. Ross River can
increase its interest to 60% by incurring a further US$1,000,000 of exploration
expenditures by April 30, 2010.



40



---





Two
additional claims, which are surrounded by the Gavilan claims, were optioned
from private Mexican individuals in 2003. To earn a 100% interest, the Company
must pay US$162,000 plus value added tax by February 2005. The two claims are
subject to a 1% NSR which can be purchased for a fixed payment of US$300,000
plus value added tax. The optionors have the right to conduct small scale (less
than 40 tonnes per day) mining operations. An agreement to option a further
three claims is expected to be finalized when the optionors (the same group of
private Mexican individuals) complete underlying documentation. Similar terms
are agreed to with the NSR buyout amount to be US$200,000. These will all come
under the deal with Ross River, and that company is responsible for all payments
on these claims while its option is in good standing.



Expenditures
to Date

As
at December 31, 2003, the Company had deferred $95,203 in acquisition and
exploration costs on the property.



Location
and Access

El
Pulpo is located north-east of Mazatlan, Mexico and covers an area of
approximately 120 square kilometres.  Access to the mineral claims is by
Highway 15 to San Ignacio and then by all season dirt road to Vado Hondo.



History
and Recent Work

The
optioned claims have numerous old historic workings explored in the past for
gold and copper.



The
El Pulpo prospect was discovered by a major company in the early 1970's. A soil
and rock geochemical sampling program was carried out at that time and produced
a copper anomaly associated with a K-silicate altered and stockwork veined
intrusive body.  A prominent consultant visited the property at that time
and wrote a report, now in the Company's possession, recommending work including
exploration tunnelling.  The Company believes that no other significant
work has been performed on the property until the current claim was staked. Late
in 2002, the Company conducted stream silt geochemical survey over parts of the
claim block, this work detected several gold-copper anomalies, rock sampling
also found several areas with anomalous gold copper and silver values.



Geology
and Mineralization

The
El Pulpo project represents a large area of porphyry-style alteration and
mineralization developed in the Teriary age Sinaloa batholith and known
alteration and mineralization covers an area 8 km by 8 km.  This alteration
is manifested by quartz-tourmaline veining, associated with copper-gold and
molybdenum values peripheral to a zone of stockwork quartz veining associated
with copper values. Later Miocene lithic tuffs cover part of the claim area.

Ross
River has informed the Company of the following results from fieldwork carried
out by Ross River during March and April 2003:



El
Bagre Target: The El Bagre Target exhibits altered calc-alkaline intrusive
quartz stockwork mineralisation hosting both oxide and sulphide copper
mineralisation. Four widely spaced rock samples collected over an area of one
square kilometre averaged 1.43 % copper, 0.13 g/t gold and 52.4 g/t silver.



Papaya
Target: The Papaya Target is one kilometre north of the El Bagre Target. Of nine
samples collected from a vein by Ross River, seven assayed  over 1 g/t
gold. The values of these seven samples ranged from 1.00 g/t gold to 30.66 g/t
gold, with an average of 8.47 g/t gold, 90.4 g/t silver and 5.11 % copper over a
width of 1.5 to 2 metres.



El
Tiburon Target: The El Tiburon target is a further one kilometre north of the La
Trucha target.  Grab samples indicate a zone where follow-up is warranted.



In
May 2003 Ross River reported initial results from a large sampling and mapping
program. In this program several vein systems were identified and sampled
including the Papaya and Trucha areas. Ross River reported that the Papaya vein
system has been traced over 2 kilometers. Ross River has reported that the vein
was identified 1.0 to 1.3 kilometers along strike where grab samples taken have
returned anomalous values in gold and copper. On the Trucha vein system located
2 kilometers north of the Papaya area, Ross River reported that the mineralized
zone explored so far is 1,200 metres long and 850 metres wide within which six
veins have been recognized. The discovery showing



41



---

occurs
on a ridge and consists of sub-outcrop of quartz-tourmaline veining exhibiting
hematite and copper oxides and is three metres wide. Ross River reported
analyses from two new grab samples taken across the width of the showing.



Ross
River also reported that two additional veins to the west and within 400 metres
of the Papaya vein (Juana and Cerro Blanco veins) have been traced over the same
strike length as the Papaya vein and that four additional parallel veins in the
same area have been discovered but have yet to be sampled. This system is open
along strike both to the north and south and the full widths of all the veins
remain to be delineated.



Ross
River also reported results from the La Trucha target located 2 kilometres
northeast of the Papaya target.



Approximately
one kilometre along strike to the southwest another area of sub-outcropping
quartz-tourmaline veins exposed through overburden cover and Ross River has
reported the results of sampling from this zone.



Ross
River has reported that the veins whose assays were reported on La Trucha and
its southwest extension are open along strike to the southwest and northeast.



In
November 2003, Ross River informed Almaden that is has discovered a new area of
porphyry style alteration and mineralization. Ross River released the results of
the initial findings of this work in a news release, an excerpt from which
follows:



"Ross
River Minerals has discovered a new copper porphyry zone and extended the known
mineralized zones of both the Papaya and La Trucha targets on its El Pulpo
property in Mexico. To date, the company has identified three copper porphyry
targets and four gold-silver-copper vein targets on the 200-square-kilometre
property.

A
new area, named the Langosta target, consisting of strong quartz-sericite-pyrite
(phyllic) alteration with stockwork quartz veining, has been identified
extending southward along a tributary creek (Quebrada Magistral) 2,000 metres
east of the Papaya target, approximately 2,500 metres southwest of La Cetolla
copper porphyry target and 600 metres northeast from the El Bagre copper target
on Rio Los Frailes. Phyllic alteration is observed, to date, on the north side
of Rio Los Frailes over a distance of 100 metres and over a distance of 150
metres on the south side of Rio Los Frailes. This alteration extends outward
from a core of potassic alteration consisting of secondary biotite and potassium
feldspar and minor magnetite over a distance of 210 metres in a southerly
direction. These two styles of alteration characteristic of porphyry systems are
hosted within an altered granodiorite to quartz-diorite intrusive complex.

Copper
mineralization observed along Quebrada Magistral, within the altered
granodiorite to quartz-diorite, consists of veinlets, disseminations and
clusters of chalcopyrite (approximately 5 to 10 per cent). At higher elevations
within this mineralized area, clusters of arsenopyrite mineralization
(approximately 1 to 5 per cent) have also been identified. Secondary copper
oxides within this area consist of malachite and black copper oxides. The extent
of the mineralized area mapped so far measures approximately 100 metres (north
to south direction) and 75 metres (east to west direction) and remains open in
all directions. A total of 25 panel and chip samples have been taken from this
area and analytical results are pending. Geologic mapping and sampling are
continuing to determine the dimension and grade of this altered and mineralized
porphyry system. Samples are being prepared at GM-Lacme Laboratories in
Guadalajara, Mexico, with final analyses being carried out by Acme Analytical
Laboratories Ltd. in Vancouver, B.C. Victor Jaramillo, P.Geo, is the qualified
person supervising the work in this area."



In
December 2003, Ross River provided the Company with the following results in the
form of a news release, an excerpt from which follows:



"Continued
geological mapping and sampling of the La Langosta target have outlined a zone
of potassic and phyllic alteration covering an area approximately 2.0 kilometres
long by 1.5 kilometres wide. A larger propylitic alteration zone occurs outside
the phyllic alteration envelope. The potassic core is characterized by secondary
biotite and potassic feldspar veining. Outside this zone occurs a quartz-sericite-pyrite
alteration (phyllic) envelope and then an outer propylitic altered zone
characterized by pervasive chlorite,



42



---

disseminated
pyrite and calcite veinlets. The limits of the propylitic alteration have yet to
be defined. These alteration zones remain open to the southwest.

From
observations of limited outcrop, copper (chalcopyrite and copper oxides) and
minor molybdenite mineralization appears to be concentrated within an area of
approximately 1,500 metres by 750 metres. The earlier identified El Bagre target
lies within the La Langosta porphyry system, within the potassic altered
envelope and is characterized by chalcopyrite, copper oxide and minor
molybdenite mineralization as veinlets and disseminations.

Ross
River is still defining the structural controls within this porphyry system.
However, the topographic relief, from Rio Frailes to the ridges 750 metres
southeast, exposes the mineralized system vertically over 200 metres. This
extends from a potassic zone, with chalcopyrite mineralization, near Rio Frailes,
in the north, to a topographically higher phyllic altered zone containing
secondary iron and copper oxides to the southeast.

Preliminary
analyses have been received for 24 samples, taken from the initial discovery
area of 100 metres by 75 metres, include copper sulphides, mixed copper
sulphides and oxides and leached oxide cap."



In
January 2004, Ross River provided the Company with the following results in the
form of a news release, an excerpt from which follows:



"Ross
River Minerals Inc. (the 'Company') is pleased to report that the 2003 field
season concluded with the Company completing 9.5 kilometres of new trail
construction and expanding the already extensive Papaya and La Trucha vein
systems on the Company's property located in Sinaloa State, Mexico. In addition,
the Company discovered seventeen new mineralized veins. Of these, seven have
greater than 300 metres of strike length traced to date. All seventeen remain
open along strike.

The
new 1.5 kilometre access trail to the La Trucha target passed through a
well-mineralized new area (La Plancha) which shows very strong
tourmaline-quartz-copper oxide and sulfide mineralization in five shallow
dipping veins, one of which has 2.0 metres of exposed width. Four other veins
have been identified in this area with lesser-exposed widths but with equally
strong mineralization. A total of 37 rock samples were collected from the La
Plancha area.

At
the La Trucha target 500 metres of trenching using a Cat D7E bulldozer has been
completed to date. The southerly vein ('F'vein), was cut in two locations and
showed strong fracturing and faulting within tourmaline-quartz veining and
copper oxides. Assay results are pending. Further trenching using a tracked
excavator will commence mid January 2004.

Exploration
at the Papaya target included 1,200 metres of trail rehabilitation and over 350
metres of trenching at two locations in the down-dip (western) direction of the
vein. At the northern location (Papaya Norte) the 40 degrees dipping
quartz-tourmaline vein was exposed over 7 metres width. At the southern trenched
area (Papaya Sur), 350 metres south of Papaya Norte, five subparallel veins
identified to date, ranging from 0.1 to 1.5 metres wide, occur on the footwall
(east) side of the 10 metre wide main vein. Assays are pending.

A
newly discovered vein (Pitayo) has been found 200 metres southeast of the
trenched Papaya Sur zone. The Pitayo vein appears to be subparallel to the
Papaya vein and is exposed over greater than 4.0 metres width. Six other veins
identified to date with lesser-exposed widths were discovered during trail
access construction. Two of these veins are observed to be crosscutting and
exhibit extensive copper and iron oxides. Assays are pending.

During
January, as development of the 2 kilometre access trail along the Papaya vein
continues, trenching to expose the full width of these veins will take place.
Over 1,000 metres of reconnaissance geological mapping and rock sampling along
the proposed trail/trench has revealed five mineralized areas to date.

The
Company has discovered a new zone (El Sauz), extending 1.6 kilometres north of
the Papaya target, of tourmaline-quartz-copper oxide vein mineralization. A
total of 26 samples were collected and analysed.

In
addition, during geological reconnaissance, a float sample of massive sulfide
was found in a creek bed in the El Sauz area near the La Trucha and La Plancha
drainage divide. The float sample returned values of gold and  silver. Its
geochemistry is similar to other veins in the La Trucha area, however the source
of this float has yet to be discovered."



43



---



Planned
Work Program - Fiscal 2004, Ending December 31, 2004

The
Company has no planned exploration program for Fiscal 2004 with all work being
conducted by Ross River who are earning their interest in the prospect.



Ross
River
has advised that its
 2004 exploration program on the Papaya and La Trucha targets will consist of
111.5 line kilometres of line cutting, soil geochemistry and Induced
Polarization and magnetometer geophysical surveys. Airborne photography covering
the property will be completed followed by production of orthophoto and
topographic maps and structural interpretation. Upon completion of the trail
along the Papaya vein zone, further excavator trenching of the La Trucha and
Papaya vein systems will follow. Following the completion of this work, targets
will be defined and diamond drilling will commence on both the Papaya and La
Trucha vein systems about mid-May.



The
Fuego Prospect - Mexico



The
Fuego Prospect is without known reserves and all current work by the Company on
the prospect is exploratory in nature.



Option
to Acquire Interest

During
Fiscal 2003, the Company's subsidiary, Compania Minera Zapata, S.A. de C.V.,
acquired 100% interest in the prospect by staking.  The project fell under
the area of influence of the BHP Billiton joint venture discussed below, and
under terms of this joint venture it was offered to BHP, who declined to
participate.



Subsequent
to December 31, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with Horseshoe Gold
Mining Inc. ("Horseshoe"). To earn an initial 50% interest, Horseshoe must
maintain the property in good standing, incur exploration expenditures totalling
US$2,000,000 and issue 1,000,000 shares to the Company by December 31, 2006.
 This includes a firm commitment to spend US$200,000 by June 30, 2004 and
issuing 200,000 shares to the Company upon regulatory approval. Horseshoe can
increase its interest to 60% by incurring a further US$1,000,000 of exploration
expenditures by December 31, 2007.
Horseshoe's right to increase its interest to 60% is subject to approval by its
shareholders of the acquisition of Almaden's remaining 40% interest.
 Upon earning a 60% interest in the prospect , Horseshoe would have 120 days to
acquire Almaden's remaining 40% interest in the prospect in return for a 40%
interest in the issued capital of Horseshoe, to be issued by Horseshoe to
Almaden at that time.



Expenditures
to Date

During
Fiscal 2003, the Company incurred $13,665 in acquisition costs and $16,707 in
exploration costs. As at December 31, 2003, the Company had deferred $30,372 in
acquisition and exploration costs on the property.



Location
and Access

The
prospect is located in south central Oaxaca State, Mexico and is accessible from
the city of Oaxaca by paved highway southeast for 114 kilometers to San Pedro
Totolapan, then by unpaved road south for 24 kilometers to San Maria Zoquitlan
and a further 32 kilometers of rough winding road extending in a southeasterly
direction.



Infrastructure

There
is no infrastructure within the immediate area of the prospect.



History
and Recent Work

Limited
historic mining was last carried out on the prospect in 1905 from open cuts and
small scale, shallow underground openings on at lease 3 separate quartz veins.



A
recent program of geological mapping and limited sampling has identified a
NNE-trending quartz-adularia vein system at least 600 meters in length. The most
significant gold-silver values from recent sampling occur along this structure.



Geology
and Mineralization

The
prospect is a high-level, classic quartz-adularia epithermal vein system. The
textures identified, including fine



44



---

grained
silica and electrum banding and bladed calcite, are typical of that associated
with bonanza grade epithermal vein systems worldwide. Some limited historic
workings exist on one of several banded veins identified within a more than 20
meter wide zone of veining and silicification in volcanic rocks. Banded
quartz-adularia veins within the vein system generally dip shallowly and are up
to 5 meters wide. In the initial work the parallel vein system has been traced
nearly a kilometre along strike. To date 16 grab and chip rock samples have been
taken on the property of both banded quartz adularia vein material and
silicified volcanic wall rock. Visible gold was recognised in several hand
specimens collected on the property which were not sent for analysis. The
property has excellent infrastructure and represents an epithermal vein system
that has had no modern exploration.



Exploration
Results

The
El Fuego vein system was first examined and sampled by Almaden during a
helicopter-supported reconnaissance exploration project in March 2003.
 There is no evidence of any recent work on the prospect. In December 2003,
a reconnaissance style, field appraisal that included geological mapping and
limited rock sampling was carried out by an independent geologist.



Planned
Work Program - Fiscal 2004, Ending December 31, 2004

The
Company has no planned exploration program for Fiscal 2004 with all work being
conducted by Horseshoe who are earning their interest in the prospect.



Geologic
mapping, geochemical rock and soil sampling have been carried out by Horseshoe
and geophysical surveys are to define the extent of the vein system and the
distribution of gold and silver. Samples have been selected for fluid inclusion
analysis which will be carried out to confirm the field observation that the
veins appear to be shallowly eroded.



BHP
Billiton Joint Venture - Mexico



On
May 9, 2002, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with BHP
Billiton World Exploration Inc. ("BHP") to undertake exploration in eastern
Mexico.  Under terms of the joint venture, each company is committed to
fund U.S.$200,000 of exploration in the first year. To earn a 51% interest in
any property which may be acquired, BHP must fund an initial US$1,000,000 of
exploration, after which both companies are committed to fund a further
US$750,000 of exploration.  If either company fails to make its
contribution, it would be diluted to a 2% net smelter return royalty.  If
both companies maintain their interest of funding, BHP can earn a further 19%
interest in each project by completing a feasibility study. An additional 10%
interest can be earned by BHP by funding the property into production.



An
initial helicopter-borne reconnaissance program was completed in May 2003 over
the area of interest of the joint-venture program. A 100% interest was acquired
by staking in two properties identified during this program. The properties,
named Fuego and Cerro Colorado, are located very close to one another in Oaxaca
State. The Fuego and Cerro Colorado projects have been offered to BHP Billiton
under terms of the joint venture agreement.



The
Fuego property is a high-level, classic quartz-adularia epithermal vein system.
The textures identified, including fine grained silica and electrum banding and
bladed calcite, are typical of that associated with bonanza grade epithermal
vein systems worldwide. Some very limited surficial historic workings exist on
one of several banded veins identified within a more than 20 meter wide zone of
veining and silicification in volcanic rocks. Banded quartz-adularia veins
within the vein system generally dip shallowly and are up to 5 meters wide. In
the initial work the parallel vein system has been traced nearly a kilometre
along strike. To date 16 grab and chip rock samples have been taken on the
property of both banded quartz adularia vein material and silicified volcanic
wall rock. Samples of banded quartz vein material returned anomalous values that
warrant follow up. Visible gold was recognised in several hand specimens
collected on the property which were not sent for analysis. The Fuego property
has excellent infrastructure and represents an entirely unexplored epithermal
vein system. Geologic mapping, geochemical rock and soil sampling and
geophysical surveys are planned to define the extent of the vein system and the
distribution of gold and silver. Samples have been selected for fluid inclusion
analysis which will be carried out to confirm the field observation that the
veins appear to be shallowly eroded.



The
Cerro Colorado property represents a new discovery as the colourful hydrothermal
alteration was recognised by



45



---

the
geologic crew passing by in a helicopter. The property covers an area of intense
hydrothermal alteration developed in volcanic rocks intruded by quartz-feldspar
porphyritic rocks. Highly weathered and oxidised silicified and acid leached
porphyritic rocks occur over a more than 2 kilometer by 2 kilometer area. These
rocks display classic "vuggy silica" textures. This texture is common
in rocks that have been exposed to highly acidic hydrothermal fluids and is
indicative of a high-sulphidation epithermal system. This style of
mineralisation hosts major gold silver deposits worldwide, including the giant
Peirina and Yanacocha gold deposits in Peru. The areas of vuggy silica are
intimately associated with broad areas of intensely argillic altered host rocks.
Initial samples from outcropping vuggy silica and argillic alteration have
returned only anomalous values of gold, silver, arsenic and antimony, however
this is not uncommon in surface exposures of weathered gold-rich vuggy silica
bodies elsewhere. Geologic mapping, geochemical rock and soil sampling and
geophysical surveys are planned to define the extent of the vuggy silica bodies
and the distribution of gold and silver.  BHP Billiton determined that the
Fuego and Cerro Colorado properties were not copper prospects, and quitclaimed
the two properties to the Company.



In
addition to the Fuego and Cerro Colorado properties, several areas of
significant mineralisation and alteration for follow-up were noted in the
initial program. Additional work programs are currently being planned for
follow-up work on these areas.



The
Ram Prospect - Canada



The
Ram Prospect is without known reserves and all current work by the Company on
the prospect is exploratory in nature.



Option
to Acquire Interest

The
Ram claims were acquired from the Company's predecessor ("Fairfield") and are
100% owned by the Company.



In
May 2000, Fairfield entered into an agreement with Ross River Gold Ltd. (now
Ross River Minerals Inc.  ("Ross River")) whereby Ross River can earn a 70%
interest in the prospect by incurring $500,000 in exploration expenditures by
April 1, 2006 and issuing to the Company a total of 390,000 shares (amended).
 Ross River has also paid the Company $21,000 in consideration for an
extension to the agreement.



Expenditures
to Date

As
at December 31, 2003, the Company had expensed all acquisition and exploration
costs and is carrying this property at $1.



Location
and Access

The
Ram prospect is in the Watson Lake Mining District, 260 kilometers northeast of
Whitehorse, and 45 kilometers south of Ross River, Yukon Territory.  The
claims are accessible by seasonal four-wheel drive road originating from the
South Canol Road (Highway 8).



History
and Recent Work

The
current 69 Ram claims formed part of a much larger block of 758 claims staked in
1984 and 1985 by Regional Resources Ltd. (Fairfield's predecessor), to cover
gold-silver and base metal geochemical anomalies and mineral occurrences.
 Work completed by Regional in 1985 included line cutting, grid geochemical
surveys, geological mapping, prospecting and minor hand trenching.



Title
to the entire claim group was transferred to Fairfield in 1986.  During
1987, Fairfield conducted further grid soil sampling, reconnaissance rock
sampling and ground geophysical surveys.  In 1988, Fairfield and joint
venture partner Equity Silver Mines Ltd. carried out diamond drilling and
additional soil geochemistry.  Thirty-one BQ core holes totaling 3723
metres were drilled to test five separate targets on the property.  Fifteen
of these holes tested the Vole, Trout and Mouse Showings located on the
presently existing (69) claims.



From
1991 to 1999, the property was under option to Pacific Comox Resources Ltd.
which conducted airborne and ground geophysical surveys, and a reverse
circulation drill program that included six short holes on the present (69)
claims.  The claim holdings were reduced to this number by December 1993.



46



---



In
May 2000 the Ram claims were optioned by Ross River which in turn optioned them,
together with its larger adjoining Tay-LP land package, to Newmont Exploration
of Canada Limited ("Newmont").  Fieldwork in the Ram area by Newmont during
2000 included airborne magnetic and electromagnetic (EM) geophysical surveys,
geological mapping and prospecting, soil and rock geochemical sampling, and
auger overburden drill sampling.  Newmont terminated its option on the
entire Ram/Tay-LP project in December, 2001.



During
2002, Ross River carried out further prospecting and rock sampling on the Ram
claims, as well as diamond drilling of four holes totaling 342.6 metres to test
EM and geochemcial anomalies.



Geology
and Mineralization

The
present claim area is underlain by a sequence of moderately deformed and
metamorphosed Lower Paleozoic sediments intruded by probable Cretaceous age
granitic rocks.  Lithologies comprising the stratigraphic assemblage
include phyllite, schist, dolostone, quartzite and slate.  Calc-silicate
hornfels and chlorite-magnetite skarn occur at or near intrusive contacts.



Auriferous
mineralization on the property is dominantly hosed by phyllite and occurs as
irregular quartz-sulphide masses, veins and stockworks, breccias, skarn/hornfels,
and local replacements of thin calcareous interbeds.  Sparse intrusive
exposures are variably silicified, clay altered and also locally contain quartz-sulphide
veins and sulphide disseminations.  A prominent regional domal uplift of
the stratified rocks is interpreted to reflect the presence of buried intrusions
responsible for the mineralizing events.  The style and setting of the
various occurrences are consistent with the model of intrusion related gold
systems along the Tintina Gold Belt of central Yukon and Alaska, within which
the Ram prospect is situated.



The
gold is associated with quartz-tourmaline, pyrrhotite, pyrite, bismuthenite,
tellurides, chalcopyrite, arsenopyrite and galena.  Best mineralization
discovered to date occurs at the Vole Showing, where drilling in 1988
intersected a quartz-sulphide stockwork zone assaying 2.2 g/t gold over 5.3
metres.  Approximately 1300 metres south of this area, a 5-metre wide
quartz-sulphide vein outcrops at the Trout Showing. This showing was also drill
tested in 1988; silver assays of up to 101.8 g/t over 1.74 metres were returned,
but gold values were low.



Infrastructure

There
is no infrastructure in place on the prospect.



Drilling
Results

During
Fiscal 2002, Ross River completed four diamond drill holes totaling 342.6 metres
on the Ram claims, to test EM and geochemical anomalies.  No significant
gold assays were obtained from core samples.



Planned
Work Program - Fiscal 2004, Ending December 31, 2004

The
Company has no planned exploration program for Fiscal 2004. Ross River is
maintaining its option on the property. The claims are in good standing to
December 31, 2004, and may be extended beyond that date pending Ross River's
filing of assessment credits for the 2002 work program.



The
Rock River Coal Prospect - Canada



The
Rock River Coal Prospect is without proven reserves and all current work by the
Company on the prospect is exploratory in nature.



47



---

Option
to Acquire Interest

During
Fiscal 2002, the Company acquired a 50% interest in four coal exploration
licenses covering 187,698 acres in the Yukon Territory through application to
Indian and Northern Affairs Canada.  Santoy Resources Ltd. ("Santoy"),
formerly Troymin Resources Ltd. ("Troymin"), holds the remaining 50% interest.
The licenses were originally applied for by the Company's President during
Fiscal 2001 and when granted, a 50% interest was for the benefit of the Company
and a 50% interest was for the benefit of Troymin. The licenses are subject to a
gross over riding royalty ('GORR") of 3% payable to H. Leo King upon the
licenses being issued. The joint venture can also purchase up to 2% of the GORR
for $1,000,000 for each per cent.



Expenditures
to Date

During
Fiscal 2003, the Company incurred expenditures of $18,770 for the third year
lease deposit and exploration costs of $10,840 which will be used to apply for a
refund of lease deposits. As at December 31, 2003, the Company had deferred
costs of $43,707 on this prospect.



Location
and Access

The
licenses are located in the Watson Lake Mining District in the Yukon Territory,
100 kilometres north east of Watson Lake.  Access is by helicopter.  A
winter road extends to 10 kilometres of the property.



History
and Recent Work

Coal
was discovered by Sulpetro Minerals Ltd. in the Rock River Basin in July 1980
and five holes were drilled in 1981 for a preliminary evaluation of the coal
potential.  A gravity survey of the entire basin on widely spaced lines was
carried out in 1982.  This survey identified nine responses possibly
sourced by coal units.  These can be divided into six anomalous areas, one
of which includes the known coal beds.  Near surface coal was intersected
in drill holes one and two.  A Yukon Government publication, "Yukon
Exploration and Geology 1983" reports that Sulpetro staff estimated 56,000,000
tonnes of lignite coal lies within 80 metres of the surface in the vicinity of
holes 1 and 2.  Analyses indicated a thermal content of 6645 BTU at
equilibrium moisture and a waste to coal ratio of 2:1.  The coal ranks from
lignite A to subbituminous C.  The Almaden/Troymin joint venture conducted
a review of government and Sulpetro data.  During the summer of 2003, a
geological review and reconnaissance program was carried out on the prospect by
Aurora Geosciences Ltd.



Geology
and Mineralization

Tertiary
strata in the Rock River Basin accumulated in an inter montane valley whose
geometry and history was probably controlled by subsidence related to the Rock
River fault.  Coal deposits in the Rock River Basin are interpreted as
products of desposition in forest moor environments associated with stable
channel fluvial systems.   If the elongate gravity anomalies
identified by Sulpetro are coal the ultimate coal potential of the property is
very high.  To prove up coal resources would require an extensive program
of closely spaced holes.



Planned
Work Program - Fiscal 2004, Ending December 31, 2004

The
Company has no planned exploration program for Fiscal 2004. The Company is
required to file a statement of work or remit fees based on $0.05 per acre in
year one, $0.10 per acre in year two and $0.20 per acre in year three.  The
licenses expire on July 30, 2004 but are renewable on the same terms.  It
is the Company's intention to renew the licenses at that time.



The
PV Prospect - Canada



The
PV Prospect is without known reserves and all current work by the Company on the
prospect is exploratory in nature.



Option
to Acquire Interest

The
claims comprising the PV prospect were acquired by staking by the Company's
predecessor ("Fairfield") in October 2001 and are 100% owned by the Company.



Subsequent
to December 31, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with Consolidated
Spire Ventures Ltd. ("Spire"). To earn a 60% interest, Spire must incur
exploration expenditures totalling $1.3 million and issue 600,000 shares to the
Company by January 10, 2007. This includes a firm commitment to spend $100,000
by December 31, 2004



48



---

and
issuing 100,000 shares to the Company upon regulatory approval.



Expenditures
to Date

During
Fiscal 2003, the Company incurred $5,824 in additional staking costs and $29,635
in exploration costs including a geophysical IP survey.  As at December 31,
2003, the Company had incurred $124,421 in acquisition and exploration costs on
the property.



Location
and Access

The
property is located approximately 50km west of Merritt, British Columbia and
access to the claims is by road.



History
and Recent Work

A
preliminary program carried out in October 2001 consisted of prospecting and
reconnaissance scale rock and soil geochemistry.  This work resulted in the
discovery of widespread and locally abundant gold bearing quartz vein float



Initial
soil sampling at 50-meter intervals was conducted along a network of old logging
roads and trails throughout the claim block.  Analytical results from the
280 soil samples taken have outlined anomalous gold (0.01-0.16 g/t Au) and
arsenic (8-20 s/t As), mainly within the one square kilometer area containing
the most abundant quartz float.



2002
field work consisted of initial coarse grid soil geochemistry, multiple stages
of detailed (infill grid) soil geochemistry, minor portable auger (soil)
sampling, substantial further prospecting and reconnaissance (rock, silt, soil)
sampling, plus mechanical excavator trenching and test pitting with related
mapping and rock/basal soil sampling.  Totals of 1241 soil, 123 rock and 11
stream sediment samples were collected and shipped to Acme Analytical
Laboratories Ltd. in Vancouver, BC for 35-element geochemical analysis.



The
mineralization found to date consists of gold bearing quartz vein and breccia
float showing distinct low sulphidation type epithermal textures with values up
to 1.112 oz/ton gold.  The quartz float is predominantly concentrated
around Bonanza Creek on the western claims and its source has not yet been
determined.  However, current field evidence indicates a local volcanic
host sequence.  Fluid inclusion studies on a few samples of the quartz vein
material have reported formation temperatures of ~200degrees Celsius, indicating
only shallow erosion of the source epithermal system.



A
total of 1385 grid and road soil samples have defined multiple element
geochemical anomalies in the area of Bonanza Creek resulting in a 660-metre
(2,165-ft.) trenching program undertaken in October 2002.  Test pits were
dug to a depth of five metres (16.4 ft.) at fifteen locations on the west side
of Bonanza Creek but no bedrock was reached.  Intermediate volcanic flows
and pyroclastics with varying degrees of carbonate and clay alteration were
uncovered by excavation on the east side of Bonanza Creek.  Narrow
north-trending quartz stringers were exposed and sampled but no significant gold
values were returned.



A
five kilometre IP geophysical survey was carried out over the Bonanza creek area
in October 2003.



Geology
and Mineralization

The
prospect was staked to cover widespread occurrences of significant gold bearing
quartz vein and quartz breccia float showing textures typical of low
sulphidation epithermal systems.  Although the claim area is extensively
covered by glacial till, most of the mineralized float is angular and local
volcanic bedrock exposures exhibit strong alteration and oxidation.



Planned
Work Program - Fiscal 2004, Ending December 31, 2004

The
Company has no planned Fiscal 2004 exploration program with all work being
conducted by Spire who are earning their interest in the property.



49



---

The
MOR Prospect - Canada



The
MOR Prospect is without known reserves and all current work by the Company on
the prospect is exploratory in nature.



Option
to Acquire Interest

The
claims comprising the MOR Prospect were acquired by staking by the Company's
predecessor ("Fairfield") during August 1997 (MOR 1-4), August 1998 (MOR 5-8)
and September 1998 (MOR 9-12).  The MOR 13 to 52 claims were added in April
1999 when the prospect was optioned to Brett Resources Inc. ("Brett").
 Brett carried out an exploration program and then returned the prospect to
Fairfield in December 1999.  The claims were transferred to the Company
upon amalgamation. The surface rights are held by the Teslin Tlingit
Council/Yukon First Nations, from whom permission is required for entry to
conduct work.



In
August 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with Kobex Resources Ltd. ("Kobex")
on the claims comprising the MOR, Caribou Creek and Cabin Lake prospects. To
earn an initial 50% interest Kobex must incur exploration expenditures of
$50,000 by August 31, 2004 and issue 100,000 shares to the Company.  To
maintain the option in good standing, Kobex must incur a further $450,000 in
exploration expenditures by August 31, 2007 and issue an additional 300,000
shares to the Company in installments of 100,000 shares by August 31, 2005, 2006
and 2007 respectively. Kobex can increase its interest to 60% by incurring a
further $500,000 of exploration expenditures by August 31, 2008 and issuing a
further 100,000 shares to Almaden. Upon commencement of commercial production,
Kobex would be required to issue an additional 500,000 shares to Almaden.

Expenditures
to Date

During
Fiscal 2003, the Company incurred $219 in costs on this prospect. As at December
31, 2003, the Company had deferred $62,024 of acquisition and exploration costs,
net of write-downs and recoveries, on the prospect.



Location
and Access

The
MOR prospect is located 9km north of the Alaska Highway in the Morley River area
of southern Yukon Territory and consists of 52 contiguous mineral claims in the
Watson Lake Mining District.  Access is by helicopter from a staging area
on the Alaska Highway.



History
and Recent Work

The
initial MOR claims (1-4) were staked in August of 1997 to cover a small zone of
significant base and precious metal values in soil and in gossanous schist
subcrop (Discovery Showing), located during follow-up of regional stream
sediment anomalies identified by Fairfield's predecessor company in 1980.
 Subsequent work in 1997 focussed on hand pitting and trenching in this
area, but also included prospecting and reconnaissance (silt, soil, rock)
sampling elsewhere on and around the four claims.



During
1998 Fairfield added 8 claims (MOR 5-12) and carried out grid soil geochemistry
(21 line-km / 432 samples), ground magnetic and VLF-EM geophysical surveys (11
line-km), limited blast trenching in the Discovery Showing area, and minor
prospecting with reconnaissance rock sampling.



In
April 1999, Brett Resources Inc. optioned the property from Fairfield and staked
40 additional claims (MOR 13-52).  Brett subsequently conducted a soil
geochemical survey (22 line-km / 442 samples) covering some of the new claims,
property-wide preliminary geological mapping at 1:10,000 scale, more detailed
(1:1,500) geological mapping in areas of known mineralization, prospecting and
rock sampling, plus claim tagging.  Brett relinquished its option on
December 31, 1999.



Field
work in 2000 consisted of additional grid soil geochemistry (43 line-km) and
ground magnetic, VLF-EM geophysical surveys (29.5 line-km); detailed grid based
soil profile and bedrock sampling by portable power auger, further prospecting
with reconnaissance rock sampling, plus handheld GPS-surveying of the claim
post, grid line and sample locations.  A total of 1223 samples were
collected and shipped to Acme Analytical Laboratories Ltd. (Vancouver, B.C.) and
ALS Chemex (North Vancouver, B.C.) for multi-element analysis.



A
two-week prospecting program was undertaken in July 2001.  A total of 197
portable power auger soil samples and 6



50



---

rock
samples were collected.  All samples were shipped to Acme Analytical Labs
for analysis.



Geology
and Mineralization

The
MOR claims are underlain by deformed and metamorphosed volcanic and sedimentary
rock assemblages of Devonian-Mississippian age.  These assemblages include
the Big Salmon Complex which in part has been correlated to Yukon-Tanana
stratigraphy that is host to several important volcanogenic massive sulphide
deposits in the Finlayson Lake district, 160 kilometres to the northeast.



The
main mineralized zone at MOR is closely associated with several subparallel
felsic schist/tuff horizons within a dominantly mafic volcanic sequence.  Mineralization
at the Discovery Showing, exposed by limited hand trenching during 1997-98,
consists mainly of coarse grained pyrite and chalcopyrite in quartz-sericite and
chlorite schists. Bedrock chip samples from this locality have returned analyses
in the following ranges: copper (Cu) 0.05 to 1.5%, lead (Pb) 0.04 to 0.51%, zinc
(Zn) 0.04 to 0.55%, silver (Ag) 7.5 to 82.2 g/t, gold (Au) 0.15 to 8.91 g/t.
 Work programs in 1998 and 1999 have traced the mineralized unit(s)
intermittently in outcrop over a strike length of 900 metres, and have outlined
an encompassing 2000-metre long by 100 to 250- metre wide multi-element soil
geochemical anomaly with a partly coincident moderately strong VLF-EM
geophysical conductor.



The
2000/2001 auger sampling provided for better overall definition of the main
mineralized trend, and revealed significant blind mineralization at two widely
separated locations within this trend.  Weathered and decomposed bedrock
samples from the new showings, which may represent different felsic horizons
than any previously sampled, yielded highly anomalous base and precious metal
values as shown in the following table:



GRID
        LOCATION
      DEPTH
        &
        SAMPLE
        INTERVAL
        (M)
      Cu
        (%)
      Pb
        (%)
      Zn
        (%)
      Ag
        (g/t)
      Au
        (g/t)2450E/2500N
      0.7
        - 1.4
      0.12
      0.57
      0.03
      43.1
      1.251.4
        - 2.0
      0.08
      0.31
      0.04
      43.1
      0.422450E/2510N
      0.2
        - 0.7
      0.10
      0.25
      0.04
      41.8
      1.760.7
        - 1.4
      0.07
      0.18
      0.04
      26.1
      0.491.4
        - 2.2
      0.10
      0.27
      0.05
      43.4
      0.783000E/2610N
      0.4
        - 1.3  *
      0.02*
      0.25
        *
      0.01*
      60.7
        *
      0.99*


(*Averaged
result from 3 samples within this interval.  Best individual sample results
include 109.2 g/t Ag and 2.14 g/t Au.)



Elsewhere
on the property, results from the 2000 program have outlined coincident
copper-silver soil anomalies together with several weak VLF-EM conductors within
a broad zone situated approximately one kilometre south from the main
(Discovery) trend.



Infrastructure

There
is no infrastructure in place on the prospect.



Drilling
Results

No
drilling has been carried out on the claims.



Planned
Work Program - Fiscal 2004, Ending December 31, 2004

The
Company has no planned exploration program for Fiscal 2004 with all work being
conducted by Kobex who are earning their interest in the prospect. Kobex is
planning an IP geophysical survey for a total cost of $50,000. The claims are in
good standing until April 29, 2008 through to April 29, 2011.





51



---



The
Cabin Lake Prospect - Canada



The
Cabin Lake prospect is without known reserves and all current work by the
Company on the prospect is exploratory in nature.



Option
to Acquire Interest

The
122 claims comprising the Cabin Lake prospect were acquired by staking between
March and September 1997 by the Company's predecessor ("Fairfield").  The
claims were transferred to the Company upon amalgamation and are owned 100% by
the Company.



In
August 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with Kobex Resources Ltd. ("Kobex")
on the claims comprising the MOR, Caribou Creek and Cabin Lake prospects - refer
to The MOR Prospect.



Expenditures
to Date

During
Fiscal 2003, the Company incurred $441 in exploration costs on this prospect. As
at December 31, 2003, the Company had deferred $35,000 in acquisition and
exploration costs, net of write-downs, on the property.



Location
and Access

The
Cabin Lake prospect is located in the Watson Lake Mining District of Yukon
Territory. The claims are 190 kilometers southeast of the city of Whitehorse and
are accessed by helicopter.  The Alaska Highway passes 20km south of the
claim group, but to date there is no road access.



History
and Recent Work

The
initial 100 Cabin Lake claims were staked during March to May of 1997 to cover
several multiple-element stream sediment and soil anomalies, and occurrences of
copper and copper plus molybdenum discovered in 1996.  In June 1997, a 277
line-km airborne electromagnetic (EM) and magnetic survey was flown over this
claim group.  Several EM anomalies and conductive trends parallel to
stratigraphy and to major fault structures were identified.



An
initial phase of baseline cutting, soil sampling, geological mapping,
prospecting and hand trenching was undertaken in July 1997. Very encouraging
results were returned from the Avalanche Area, where a large copper soil anomaly
with values greater than 150 g/t Cu was delineated over an area of approximately
900 by 500 meters.



Twenty-two
claims were added and a second phase of work in August and September of 1997
included fill-in soil sampling, intensified prospecting of anomalies, 390m of
excavator trenching, and 7.05 line-kilometers of induced polarization (IP)
geophysical surveying.  The best results from trenching were 0.35% copper
averaged over 18.4m of continuous chip samples.  The IP survey identified
several zones of chargeability and resistivity anomalies, with the strongest
chargeability values extending several hundred meters to the east and south of
known mineralization exposed at surface in the Avalanche Area.



During
the 1998 field season additional IP geophysical surveys, soil geochemistry and
prospecting were carried out.  The IP chargeability and resistivity
anomalies detected in 1997 in the Avalanche Area were better defined and
extended.



In
the southern half of the property (South Area) partly underlain by a granitic
intrusion, widely spaced grid soil sampling (200m X 50m) outlined a number of
coincident copper-molybdenum anomalies over an area of 200m by 1500m, with peak
values of 640/t Cu and 68 g/t Mo.



No
work has been undertaken on the Cabin Lake claims since 1998.



Geology
and Mineralization

The
prospect is primarily underlain by Paleozoic to Triassic metasedimentary and
metavolcanic rocks of marine origin. Two distinct Mesozoic intrusive bodies are
present: a small diorite/granodiorite stock exposed in the central and
northwestern part of the property, and a larger granodiorite/quartz monzonite
pluton on the southwestern claims.



Pyrite,
chalcopyrite and minor other sulphide minerals are present as disseminations to
semi-massive bands in certain



52



---

schist
layers on the central and western claims (Avalanche Area).  The sulphide
minerals appear to be stratabound, and may represent remobilized and
metamorphosed stratiform syngenetic type mineralization similar to important
polymetallic deposits recently discovered within broadly correlative terranes in
the Finlayson Lake map area located about 160 kilometers northeast of Cabin
Lake.



Local
porphyry-type alteration and quartz stringers carrying chalcopyrite-molybdenite
mineralization are hosted by granodiorite on the southern Cabin Lake claims
(South Area).  Angular quartz float indicative of larger individual veins
(10-30cm wide) occurs in linear topographic depressions.



Infrastructure

There
is no infrastructure in place.



Drilling
Results

No
drilling has been carried out on the prospect to date.



Planned
Work Program - Fiscal 2004, Ending December 31, 2004

The
Company has no planned exploration program for Fiscal 2004 with all work being
conducted by Kobex who are earning their interest in the prospect.



The
Caribou Creek Prospect - Canada



The
Caribou Creek prospect is without known reserves and all current work by the
Company on the prospect is exploratory in nature.



Option
to Acquire Interest

The
48 claims comprising the Caribou Creek prospect were acquired by staking by the
Company's predecessor ("Fairfield") during April, September 1997 and August
1998.  The claims were transferred to the Company upon amalgamation and are
owned 100% by the Company.



In
August 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with Kobex Resources Ltd. ("Kobex")
on the claims comprising the MOR, Caribou Creek and Cabin Lake prospects - refer
to The MOR Prospect.



Expenditures
to Date

During
Fiscal 2003, the Company incurred no costs on this prospect. As at December 31,
2003, the Company had deferred $35,000 of acquisition and exploration costs, net
of write-downs, on the property.



Location
and Access

The
Caribou Creek prospect is located in the Watson Lake Mining District of Yukon
Territory 180 kilometres east of Whitehorse and 180 kilometres west of Watson
Lake.  The prospect is accessed by helicopter from Morley River on the
Alaska Highway, which is located about 30km south of the area.



History
and Recent Work

Previous
mineral exploration work in the area covered by the present claims is limited to
reconnaissance programs carried out by Fairfield's predecessor company in 1980,
and by Fairfield in 1996 and 1997.  Stream sediment sampling and follow-up
work in 1980 identified a strong copper-lead-zinc silt and soil geochemical
anomaly in the vicinity of gossanous schist outcrop.  The initial 30 claims
were staked in April 1997 to cover the stream sediment and soil anomalies from
the 1980 sampling program, and additional claims were added in September to
extend the property over favourable lithologies.  Further claims were added
in August 1998 to cover the projections of anomalous zinc soil geochemical
trends.



After
initial claim acquisition, an 85 line-km airborne electromagnetic (EM) and
magnetic survey was flown over the area during June 1997.  Several weak EM
anomalies and magnetic trends were identified.



Programs
of soil sampling, geological mapping, prospecting and an induced polarization
(IP) geophysical survey were undertaken in later 1997 and in 1998.  A
600-meter by 100-meter band of anomalous copper, lead, zinc and silver values



53



---

in
soils was identified on the central and western claims.  Several
occurrences of rusty, pyritic schist float and bedrock were noted in two areas
and were exposed by blast trenching in 1998.  Rock samples returned weakly
anomalous gold and silver values from one of these trenched areas.  The IP
geophysical survey conducted along 3 line-km identified several zones of
moderate chargeability within the area of anomalous soil geochemistry.



The
prospect was optioned to Brett Resources Inc. ("Brett") in 1999 which carried
out limited geological mapping and rock sampling.   The prospect has
since been returned to the Company.



Geology
and Mineralization

The
prospect is primarily underlain by a package of Paleozoic metavolcanic and
metasedimentary schists, which are overlain (either structurally or
stratigraphically) by Mississippian limestone.  A variety of small
intrusive bodies are present, at least some of which intrude both the schist and
limestone.



Strongly
disseminated pyrite is present within certain schist layers on the central and
western property area, and may represent stratiform syngenetic type
mineralization.  These gossanous schist horizons are hosted within a
bimodal volcanic sequence in the vicinity of strong copper, lead, zinc, silver
and gold soil geochemical anomalies.



Infrastructure

There
is no infrastructure in place on the prospect.



Drilling
Results

No
drilling has been carried out on the claims.



Planned
Work Program - Fiscal 2004, Ending December 31, 2004

The
Company has no planned exploration program for Fiscal 2004 with all work being
conducted by Kobex who are earning their interest in the prospect. The claims
are in good standing until September 4, 2004 through April 14, 2009.



The
Meister River Prospect - Canada



The
Meister River Prospect is without known reserves and all work by the Company's
predecessor ("Fairfield") on the prospect has been exploratory in nature.
 No work has been conducted on the prospect since 1986.



Option
to Acquire Interest

The
Company owns a 100% interest in the prospect, acquired during 2002 from
Fairfield through amalgamation.



Expenditures
to Date

During
Fiscal 2003, the Company incurred $213 in exploration costs on this prospect.
 As at December 31, 2003, the Company had expensed all acquisition and
exploration costs and is carrying this prospect at $1.



Location
and Access

The
Meister River prospect is located 90 kilometres (56 miles) west of Watson Lake,
Yukon Territory and 14 kilometres (9mi.) northwest of kilometre 1110 (Mile 690)
on the Alaska Highway.  A seasonal four-wheel drive road from the Alaska
Highway provided access to the claims during previous exploration programs.



History
and Recent Work

All
of the original 410 Meister River (MR) claims were staked by Regional Resources
Ltd. (Fairfield's predecessor) in 1981 to 1984, to cover geochemical anomalies
and mineral occurrences in a geological setting favourable for hosting
replacement type massive lead-zinc sulphide deposits.



Property
exploration programs from 1981 to 1985 included grid layout, aerial photography,
geological mapping, prospecting, geochemical sampling, airborne and ground
geophysical surveys, hand trenching, backhoe trenching/test-pitting, sonic
overburden drilling, and diamond drilling comprising five NQ (core) holes
totalling 1,077 metres in the West Zone oxide mineral body.  The access
road from the Alaska Highway as well as trench and drill site access trails were
also constructed during this time period.



54



---



In
May 1986 the property was transferred to Fairfield.  A diamond drilling
program carried out later that season consisted of 2,413 metres in 22 NQ holes
of which eight holes (687m) further tested the West Zone, and 14 holes (1,726m)
which tested four separate areas of mineralization in the South Zone.



Following
the 1986 program, additional diamond drilling was recommended for the West Zone
to test for sulphide mineralization at depth but this work has not been carried
out.  As at December 31, 2003, all except seven of the claims have been
allowed to lapse.



Geology
and Mineralization

The
MR claim group is underlain by a deformed and metamorphosed sequence of Lower
Cambrian or earlier sedimentary rocks.  A small Cretaceous (?) quartz
monzonite stock occurs nearby.  Mineralization consisting of
zinc-silver-lead bearing massive iron and manganese oxides, with sparse remnant
sphalerite and galena, appears to be related to replacements and/or fault
structures at or near phyllite-carbonate contacts.  Five separate mineral
zones have been identified of which the most substantial is the West Zone oxide
body.



The
West Zone mineralization has been traced in outcrop and in trenches over a
strike length of 1000 metres, revealing true widths ranging from less than one
metre to 18 metres.  It occurs as mantos or elliptical shaped lenses
aligned along a moderately dipping fault structure.  The best averaged
assay results from trench samples are 12.01% zinc (Zn), 0.32% lead (Pb) and 1.39
oz/ton silver (Ag) over 14.0 metres that included a 9.0 - metre section of
massive oxides.  The oxide material has been intersected to a vertical
depth of 105 metres by diamond drilling, and has been encountered in 12 of the
13 holes which have tested the West Zone.  Drill intercepts of oxide ranged
in length from 1.0 to 29.0 metres; the 29-metre interval, from Hole 86-MR-8,
assayed 3.79% Zn and 1.22 oz/ton Ag and included a 14-metre section which
assayed 4.57% Zn, 0.94% Pb,  2.01 oz/ton Ag.



In
the South Zone, based on the 1986 drill program, the best results were returned
from a partially oxidized graphitic phyllite unit where a 12.0-metre intercept
assayed 2.56% lead, 2.06% zinc and 0.05 oz/ton silver.  A
       5.0-metre section within this interval
assayed 5.02% lead, 4.11% zinc and 0.10 oz/ton silver.



Infrastructure

Two
lumber and plywood buildings, as well as core storage racks, remain at the old
exploration campsite.



Drilling
Results

No
recent drilling has been conducted by the Company.



Planned
Work Program-Fiscal 2004, Ending December 31, 2004

The
Company has no planned exploration program for Fiscal 2004. The Company is
seeking a joint venture partner to fund potential future work.



The
Logan Property - Canada



The
Logan Property contains an inferred mineral resource of 13.08 million tonnes
(14.42 million tons) grading 5.10% zinc and 23.7 gm/tonne (0.69oz/ton) silver,
as recently re-estimated by an independent party to comply with the Canadian
Securities Administrators (CSA) National Instrument 43-101 standards (Form
43-101F1).



Interest

The
Company owns a 40% carried interest in the property, acquired from its
predecessor ("Fairfield") through amalgamation.  The owner of the 60% joint
venture interest is required to fund 100% of exploration expenditures until a
production decision is made, at which time the Company may elect to pay its
proportionate share of future expenditures after the production decision or
convert its property interest into a 15% Net Profits Interest.  In 2003,
the 60% owner agreed to sell its joint venture interest to Expatriate Resources
Ltd. ("Expatriate").  To simplify documentation, a new agreement was
entered into at this time directly between the Company and Expatriate with all
details of the previous agreement remaining the same.



Expenditures
to Date



55



---



During
Fiscal 2003, the Company incurred $3,871 in exploration costs on this prospect.
 As at December 31, 2003, the Company had expensed all acquisition and
exploration costs and is carrying this property at $1.



Location
and Access

The
Logan Property comprises 156 claims located 108 kilometres northwest of Watson
Lake, Yukon at latitude 60 degrees 30 minutes North and longitude 130 degrees 27
minutes West.  The claims are situated 38 kilometres north of the Alaska
Highway and 258 kilometres east of Whitehorse.  Principal access is by
fixed-wing aircraft or helicopter.  A 52 kilometre trail originating from
Milepost 687 (Km 1105) on the Alaska Highway provides minimum winter access to
the property for track-equipped machinery.



History
and Recent Work

The
initial 36 Logan claims were staked in July and October 1979 to cover showings
of zinc-silver-copper-tin mineralization discovered during a reconnaissance
prospecting and stream sediment sampling program undertaken by Regional
Resources Ltd.  (Fairfield's predecessor).  Additional claims (Logan
37-106) were staked at various dates in 1984 and 1986.  Property
exploration programs including geological mapping, geochemical and geophysical
surveys, detailed prospecting and hand trenching were carried out between 1979
and 1985.



In
May 1986 the property was transferred to Fairfield and subsequent exploration
programs during 1986 to 1988 included diamond drilling (103 holes totalling
16,439 metres of NQ core), excavator trenching (15 trenches totalling 2,412
linear metres), additional soil geochemistry, Induced Polarization geophysical
surveys, as well as aerial photography, various ground control surveys,
construction of a 700-metre long gravel airstrip, and reclamation work.
 Most of the drilling was conducted at 100-metre by 50-metre grid spacing.



All
of the above work programs were performed or supervised by Cordilleran
Engineering Ltd. of Vancouver, Canada.  All project sample assays and
analyses were performed by Bondar Clegg & Company Ltd. in North Vancouver.
In late 1988 an initial mineral resource estimate for the Main Zone deposit was
calculated by J.J. Hylands, P.Eng., and M.A. Stammers, FGAC, of Cordilleran
Engineering Ltd.  These calculations, utilizing sectional and plan methods,
resulted in a determination of 12.25 million tonnes (13.5 million tons) grading
6.17% zinc and 26.4 gm/tonne (0.77 oz/ton) silver.   However, this
estimate was not strictly defined according to Canadian Institute of Mining (CIM)
standard resource/reserve classifications.



In
early 1989 preliminary metallurgical testing was undertaken on composite samples
of drill core assembled from 16 selected intersections of the Main Zone deposit.
 This work was conducted by Lakefield Research under the direction of
Strathcona Mineral Services Ltd. of Toronto, Canada.  The results
demonstrated that high zinc (93-97%) and silver (85-87%) recoveries are readily
achievable from a concentrate grading 50-54% zinc.



The
project was dormant from 1989 through 2002.



Expatriate
purchased a 60% joint venture interest in the property from Energold Minerals
Inc. (formerly Total Energold) and became the operator of the project.  A
baseline environmental survey was conducted in and around the property in
advance of further exploration and/or engineering studies.  Staking of the
LOGAN 107 to 152 and STRIP 1 to 4 mineral claims was completed to cover areas of
potential infrastructure.  Core storage facilities at the old exploration
camp were refurbished and core inventoried for future examination.



In
November 2003, Expatriate commissioned Hatch Associates Ltd. ("Hatch") to
complete a resource estimate and data compilation as part of an Independent
Technical Report to NI 43-101 standards.  Hatch completed this assignment
with the assistance of Mr. Gary Giroux, P.Eng., while Hatch's Qualified Person
for this assessment is Mr. Callum Grant, P.Eng. who visited and inspected the
property in October 2003.  The resource estimation portion of the report
was released on March 24, 2004.



The
Hatch re-estimation of resources at Logan uses the block model method, with
kriging applied to the assay data from 58 drill holes completed in the Main Zone
during 1986-88.  The model relies wholly on this historical drill-hole
information and does not include any new exploration data.  The model is
contrained by geologic boundaries to mineralization as interpreted on 23
cross-sections of the Main Zone over a 1.53 km (0.95 mile) strike length.
 No



56



---

mineralized
intercepts are included from the East or West Zones.  The published
Inferred Resource of 13.08 MT grading 5.10% Zn and 23.7 g/t Ag uses a 3.5%
zinc-equivalent cutoff that is based upon metal prices of US 43 cents per pound
zinc and US$5.50 per ounce silver, with recoveries of 94% and 64% respectively.



Geology
and Mineral Deposits

The
property is dominantly underlain by granodiorite and pegmatites of the
Cretaceous Marker Lake Batholith, which has intruded Lower Cambrian and possibly
older metasedimentary rocks.  Tertiary andesite dykes, quartz-feldspar
monzonite-latite porphyry dykes, quartz veins and breccia bodies are associated
with an eight kilometre long northwest trending mineralized structure.
 Within this structure, at least three mineral bodies have been identified
and named as the Main, West and East Zones.



The
Main Zone deposit has been defined by 58 drill intersections, to an average
vertical depth of 185 metres (~600 feet).  It is contained within a steeply
dipping fault bounded  tabular body 1100 metres long by 50 to 140 metres
wide.  Sphalerite with lesser pyrite, arsenopyrite, chalcopyrite,
pyrrhotite, silver-bearing lead sulphosalts and cassiterite occur as fracture
fillings, disseminations and coarse masses in quartz veins or breccia and
silicified hostrock.



Infrastructure

With
the exception of the airstrip and connecting network of drillsite access trails,
there is no infrastructure in place on the property.



Planned
Work Program - Fiscal 2004, Ending December 31, 2004

The
Company has no planned exploration program for Fiscal 2004.  Expatriate has
renewed the Yukon Government permits required for exploration land use and
winter road access, but it has not to date advised the Company on any formal
2004 work plan.



The
Tim Prospect - Yukon Territory



The
Tim Prospect is without known reserves and all work done by the Company's
predecessor ("Fairfield") on the prospect has been exploratory in nature.
 No work has been conducted on the prospect since 1988.



Option
to Acquire Interest

The
Company owns a 100% interest in the prospect, acquired during 2002 from
Fairfield through amalgamation.



Expenditures
to Date

During
Fiscal 2003, the Company incurred no costs on this prospect.  As at
December 31, 2003, the Company had expensed all acquisition and exploration
costs and is carrying this property at $1.



Location
and Access

The
Tim prospect consists of 10 contiguous claims located 72 kilometres (45 Mi.)
West of Watson Lake, Yukon Territory at latitude 60 degrees 03' North and
longitude 130 degrees 05' West.  A seasonal four-wheel drive road
originating at kilometre 1128 (Mile 701) of the Alaska Highway provided access
to the claims during previous exploration programs.



History
and Recent Work

The
original group of 130 TIM claims was staked by Regional Resources Ltd.
(Fairfield's predecessor) in 1983, to cover silver-lead-zinc geochemical
anomalies and mineralized float occurrences in an area highly prospective for
replacement type massive sulphide deposits.  Fairfield staked 30 additional
claims during 1986, following transfer of title from Regional.  Work
conducted from 1983 to 1986 consisted of reconnaissance stream sediment
sampling, soil geochemistry, prospecting and geological mapping.



In
1988 work included road construction, line cutting, soil sampling, induced
polarization (IP) geophysical surveys, and excavator trenching.  Eighteen
trenches totaling 2712 linear metres were excavated in two mineralized areas
named North and South Zones.  The 1988 soil geochemical survey involved
higher density sampling within the anomalous areas outlined by prior (1984/86)
sampling.



57



---



A
diamond drill program was recommended following evaluation of the 1988
exploration results, but was never carried out.  The property has been
reduced to 10 claims covering the main (North Zone) trend of mineralization.



Geology
and Mineralization

The
TIM claims are underlain by a folded succession of Lower Cambrian and earlier
sedimentary rocks comprising intercalated limestone, phyllite, quartzite,
siltstone and mudstone.  A nearby buried intrusion is inferred from
geophysical signatures on published maps and from local thermal alteration
effects observed in limestone.  The limestone unit is cut by fault
breccias, quartz-calcite veins and oxide mineral bodies.



Soil
geochemical surveys have outlined two large coincident silver (Ag) - lead (Pb) -
zinc (Zn) anomalies measuring approximately 1500 metres long by 300 metres wide,
and containing geochemical values of up to 20.8 g/t Ag, 6660 g/t Pb and 1700 g/t
Zn.  Within these anomalous areas trenching has exposed two zones of Ag-Pb-Zn
bearing oxide mineralization.  The main or North Zone has been traced over
a strike length of 1000 metres.



The
mineralization consists of massive iron and manganese oxides, with minor remnant
sulphides including galena, sphalerite and pyrite occurring as isolated cobbles
or as discrete grains within the oxides and wall rock material.  North Zone
oxide bodies uncovered by trenching range in width from four to 30 metres and
occur mainly in limestone, at or near an inferred major fault contact with
overlying phyllite rocks.  Continuous chip sample assays from trenches
across this zone include 10.28 oz/ton Ag, 9.12% Pb averaged over 4.0 metres and
1.0 oz/ton Ag averaged over 11.0 metres.  A 2.0-metre section of carbonate
hosted oxide mineralization located north of the main zone returned 0.38 oz/ton
Ag, 1.82% Pb, 5.07% Zn.



Infrastructure

There
is no infrastructure on the claims.



Drilling
Results

No
drilling has been conducted to date.



Planned
Work Program - Fiscal 2004, Ending December 31, 2004

The
Company has no work program is planned for Fiscal 2004.  Future work will
be contingent upon improved silver and base metal prices.



The
Santa Maria Prospect - Mexico



The
Santa Maria Prospect is without known reserves and all current work by the
Company on the prospect is exploratory in nature.



Option
to Acquire Interest

The
prospect is owned through the Company's subsidiary, Compania Minera Zapata, S.A.
de C.V.  The Cerro Grande claim was acquired directly by staking. This
project falls under the area of influence of the BHP Billiton joint venture
discussed above, and under terms of this joint venture it has been offered to
BHP.



Expenditures
to Date

During
Fiscal 2003, the Company incurred $1,277 in acquisition costs and $56,477 in
exploration costs, primarily on geology.  As at December 31, 2003, the
Company had incurred $61,643 in deferred costs on the prospect.



Location
and Access

The
Santa Maria project is located twenty-one kilometres north of Puebla, Puebla
State, Mexico and may be accessed by paved highway from Puebla.  Several
other paved and unpaved roads provide access to various parts of the prospect
from this highway. The centre of the prospect is approximately latitude 19
degrees 42 minutes North and longitude 97 degrees 52 minutes west.



Infrastructure

All
major services are found in Puebla, a major city located roughly one hundred
 kilometres to the south west of the



58



---

prospect.
 Labour is available in local towns and villages.  There is good road
access throughout most of the area and major power lines also cross the
prospect.  A local power line network supplies electricity to villages
within the area.



History
and Recent Work

Several
limited, surficial historic workings exist on the prospect, however their age is
unknown. To the Company's knowledge, no recent work has been carried out on the
prospect other than that done by the Company.



Geology
and Mineralization

The
project covers an area of intensely altered rocks roughly 5 by 5 kilometres in
size.  Within this area a field program carried out by the Company
identified both a porphyry copper and en epithermal gold target.  The
copper porphyry target occurs within K-silicate altered intrusive rocks that
intrude deformed limestone which is overlain by intensely altered volcanic
rocks. Calc-silicate altered limestone occurs in proximity to the intrusive
contacts and is associated with skarn-type copper mineralization.  Multiple
phases make up the intrusive body which has been altered and veined.  Stockwork
quartz pyrite veining dominates the alteration and is associated with minor
copper mineralization.  This alteration is observed to overprint earlier
potassic alteration.  An induced polarisation geophysical survey was
carried out on one line over the exposed stockwork veined intrusive. This survey
indicated that the exposed mineralization  represents a portion of a larger
intrusive hosted system.  The volcanic rocks, which are exposed roughly one
kilometer to the south of the outcropping intrusive are also extensively
altered.  The alteration is indicative of the upper parts of an epithermal
system and includes replacement silicification and sinter, the precipitate or
sediment that was deposited from a hot spring.  Quartz-calcite veins with
textural evidence of boiling have been identified outcropping in limestone
roughly 100 meters beneath the exposed sinter. Initial sampling of these veins
and from float boulders of breccia containing quartz vein fragments have
returned anomalous values in gold and silver.  The sinter and overlying
altered volcanic rocks are highly anomalous in Hg, As and Sb.



Exploration
and Drilling Results

A
program of geologic mapping, rock, stream silt sampling and induced polarization
geophysics was carried out in January of 2003. This program focused on the
exposed porphyry intrusive and related skarn bodies but also covered areas of
epithermal alteration. Anomalous results were received from rock samples taken
from both the porphyry style and epithermal alteration and mineralisation. These
results warrant further work. One line of induced polarization geophysics was
carried out on the property. This work identified a greater than two kilometer
wide zone of elevated chargeability response which is coincident with the
exposed altered and mineralised intrusive system.



Planned
Work Program - Fiscal 2004, Ending December 31, 2004

The
Company and BHP are reviewing the prospect and at present have no planned Fiscal
2004 exploration program.



The
Guadalupe Prospect - Mexico



The
Guadalupe Prospect is without known reserves and all current work by the Company
on the prospect is exploratory in nature.



Option
to Acquire Interest

During
Fiscal 2003, the Company's subsidiary acquired 100% interest in the La Bufa
claim by staking.



Subsequent
to December 31, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with Grid Capital
Corporation ("Grid"). To earn an initial 50% interest, Grid must maintain the
property in good standing, incur exploration expenditures totalling US$1,000,000
and issue 400,000 shares to the Company by June 30, 2007. Grid is committed to
issue 100,000 shares to Almaden upon TSX Venture Exchange approval of the
agreements and to complete US$50,000 in exploration expenditures by June 30,
2004. Grid can increase its interest to 60% by incurring an additional
US$1,000,000 of exploration expenditures and issuing a further 100,000 shares to
the Company by December 31, 2008.



Expenditures
to Date

During
Fiscal 2003, the Company incurred $10,841 in acquisition and exploration costs.
As at December 31, 2003, the Company had deferred cost of $10,841 on this
prospect.



59



---



Location
and Access

The
Guadalupe project surrounds the town and mining camp of Guadalupe y Calvo in
Chihuahua State, Mexico.



History
and Recent Work

Gold
was discovered at Guadalupe y Calvo on the ground surrounded by the La Bufa
claim in October 1835.  Production was sufficiently large that the Mexican
government built a mint at Guadalupe y Calvo in 1844.  L.J. Buchanan (1981)
estimated historic production at 2,000,000 ounces gold and 28,000,000 ounces
silver.  Estimated production grade was 37 g/t gold and 870 g/t silver.
This ground is currently being explored by another company.



The
La Bufa ground has some known vein outcrops with old historic workings.



In
April 2004, Grid reported that an initial program of geological mapping and
sampling traced a major vein structure, the La Bufa, over a 1.4 kilometre
distance.  The La Bufa vein is hosted in a window of lower volcanic group
andesitic rocks, the same rocks that host the past-producing mines at Guadalupe
y Calvo located one kilometre to the northwest.



Sixty
chip samples taken across the vein system returned elevated gold and silver
values along its entire length.



Geology
and Mineralization

The
La Bufa vein is a banded, brecciated, low-sulphidation, epithermal quartz vein
that is crosscut by a series of en echelon veins varying in length from 30
centimetres to 7.8 metres true thickness.  The veins are variably
mineralized with pyrite, hematite and limonite.



Planned
Work Program - Fiscal 2004, Ending December 31, 2004

The
Company has no planned exploration program for Fiscal 2004 with all work being
conducted by Grid who are earning their interest in the prospect. Grid reported
in late April 2004, that it intends to carry out a more detailed sampling
program on the vein systems by mid May.



The
San Carlos Prospect - Mexico



The
San Carlos Prospect is without known reserves and all current work by the
Company on the prospect is exploratory in nature.



The
San Carlos Prospect consists of the San Carlos and San Jose claims located in
the State of Tamaulipas in Mexico



Option
to Acquire Interest

The
prospect is owned through the Company's subsidiary, Compania Minera Zapata, S.A.
de C.V.  The San Carlos claim was acquired directly by staking.  The
San Jose claim, initially held under option, was purchased outright in February
2001 for US$100,000 plus a 2% NSR.  These claims surround several small
claims totaling 97 hectares which were optioned for a purchase price of
US$1,000,000 over six years subject to a sliding scale royalty of from 2.5% to
1.5% depending on the rate of production.



During
Fiscal 2001, Aurcana Corporation ("Aurcana") was granted the option to acquire
up to a 60% interest in the project.  To earn an initial 50% interest,
Aurcana had to maintain the property in good standing, incur exploration
expenditures of US$2,000,000 by January 1, 2007 and issue a total of 300,000
common shares to the Company.  Aurcana could have increased its interest to
60% by incurring an additional US$2,000,000 of exploration expenditures by
January 2, 2009.



Aurcana
earned a 10% interest in the San Jose concession upon payment of the US$50,000
to the Company.  At the end of 2003, Aurcana relinquished their option on
the property.  They also gave their 10% interest in the San Jose claim to
Almaden in return for a release from further work commitments.



Subsequent
to December 31, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with Hawkeye Gold
and Diamond Ltd. ("Hawkeye"). To earn an initial 51% interest, Hawkeye must
maintain the property in good standing, incur



60



---

exploration
expenditures totalling US$2,000,000 and issue 500,000 shares to the Company
within four years.



Expenditures
to Date

During
Fiscal 2003, the Company recovered costs of $31,961 on this prospect.  As
at December 31, 2003, the Company had deferred acquisition and exploration costs
of $244,590, net of write-downs, on the property.



Location,
Access and Climate

The
prospect is located in the state of Tamaulipas, which is in the north-eastern
part of Mexico.  The town of San Carlos is located roughly in the center of
the San Carlos claim block. There is two phase power, telephone service, general
supplies and a small hotel in this town.



San
Carlos is connected by paved road, and is about 100 kilometres north of the
capital of Tamaulipas, Ciudad Victoria.  The town of Linares, Nuevo Leon is
located approximately 80 kilometers northwest of San Carlos.  Intermediate
to San Carlos and Linares, and connected by an all season dirt road is the
mining district of San Jose.



The
climate is arid and hot.  During the summer months temperatures can average
greater than 35 degrees centigrade.  The duration and timing of the summer
rainy season varies considerably; however, rains generally are expected during
the months of June, July and August.



The
town of San Carlos is approximately a three and one half hour drive from
Monterrey which is a major industrial city with a population of about three
million people.  Ciudad Victoria and Linares are both about a one and one
half hour drive from San Carlos and have populations of over 100,000 people.
 All necessary supplies can be purchased at these towns and labour is
abundant.



History
and Recent Work

Accurate
historic data is difficult to find, however, it appears that up until 1911
copper-gold mining did occur. At that time, the operator was an English company
that built a narrow gauge rail line to the property and a small smelter on the
property. There is no record of total production at that time. Several attempts
were made to establish production on a small scale from these skarn zones as
recently as 1950, records are incomplete but indicate 4,067 tons of direct
shipping ore that averaged 4.02% copper (Cu) and 11.24 grams/ton gold (Au) was
mined during this period.  Fairfield was attracted to this area following a
review by management of the geological literature on eastern Mexico.  The
literature indicated that the many of the igneous rocks are alkalic in
composition.  This is of interest because many large copper-gold deposits
are associated with these types of rocks.  The literature also described a
skarn zone up to five hundred metres wide.  The San Jose area was the site
of an historic mining camp (Begonia and Santa Helena mines) that was active
during the late 1800's and early 1900's.  Production from this area was
from a number of high-grade copper-gold skarn orebodies.  The old workings
are reported to be limited to less than 100 metres below surface. There has been
only limited exploration, development, and production from that time until the
present activity.



Fairfield
acquired a large block of ground over the area and then negotiated terms to
acquire the San Jose and Begonia claims. The San Jose Claim was subsequently
purchased subject to a 2% royalty.



Property
scale prospecting and stream sediment sampling were undertaken in May 1998 and
February 1999 by Fairfield's personnel.  An airborne
magnetometer-electro-magnetic survey was carried out over most of the claim
block in April 1999 by Terraquest Ltd. of Mississauga, Ontario.  In June
2000 a baseline was cut for geochemical surveying.  Assaying and analysis
was carried out by Acme Analytical Labs of Vancouver, Canada.



After
optioning the property early in 2001, Aurcana carried out geological mapping,
geochemical surveys, underground mapping and sampling in the Begonia and Santa
Helena mine areas, and two phases of geophysical surveys. Targets outlined by
this work were drilled in two phases in late 2002 and early in 2003. Further
limited geochemical surveys to check a gold anomaly on the eastern edge of the
previous grid was also carried out.



Geology
and Mineralization

A
trend of alkalic intrusive centers has been recognized in eastern Mexico.
 These rocks generally form distinct, isolated high relief areas and
intrude deformed and thrust faulted, dominantly carbonate strata of the eastern
extent of



61

---

the Sierra Madre Oriental mountain range.



Extrusive and intrusive rocks in the San Carlos area are interpreted to represent the erosional remnant of a denuded shield volcano.  The volcanic rocks have been recognized along the margins of a major intrusive complex, and the intrusives are thought to represent shallowly emplaced magmas.  The San Jose area is cored by a strongly fractured quartz-microdiorite.  To the south of the San Jose area both calc-alkaline and alkaline intrusives occur and have been cut by lamprophyre and phonolite dykes.



Several styles of mineralization are known in the San Carlos district. Manto and vein silver-lead-zinc orebodies hosted in limestone were exploited in the 18th century east of the San Jose district at San Nicolas.  These orebodies were very important at that time and at one point the town of San Nicolas reportedly had a population of over 10,000.  Several grab samples were taken from dump material and exposures in workings.  Most of these showings are held by others but are proximal to the San Carlos claim group.



Mineralization in the San Jose district is closely related to intrusive rocks.  Copper sulphides and gold are associated with calc-silicate minerals and magnetite (skarn) that have replaced the limestone country rock.  Copper sulphides and gold are also associated with extensive K-silicate alteration and veining within the intrusive body, which present the potential for a porphyry style gold-copper deposit in the intrusive complex. The geologic setting of the San Carlos project bears many similarities to that of the Grasberg and Bingham Canyon porphyry copper-gold-molybdenum deposits where similar intrusive rocks intrude folded limestone strata forming both porphyry and skarn mineralisation.



Exploration Results

Stream sediment sampling and prospecting along with examination of old workings in the Begonia and Santa Helena areas, when related to the known geology and airborne magnetic survey results, indicated several areas for follow-up with potential for porphyry and skarn related copper gold deposits. The San Jose and Begonia areas evolved into the main area of interest.



A second area of interest, the Magnum zone, located 15 kilometres south of the San Jose mining camp was defined by an airborne magnetic anomaly, and a number of stream silt samples  anomalous in  copper and gold from the creeks draining this area. Follow-up geologic mapping and prospecting identified skarn boulders and large areas of outcropping gabbro and pyroxenite. Further prospecting and sampling to locate the source of these anomalies failed to find a significant zone of mineralization..



The third area of interest on the property, the El Jatero zone, where Fairfield's work identified an interesting gold stream sediment anomaly, is located roughly 15 km east of the Magnum zone.  The anomalous streams appear to drain an area of highly clay altered intrusive rocks, and follow-up mapping and prospecting failed to find significant mineralization.



Aurcana Work

A preliminary prospecting and mapping program confirmed the presence of widespread porphyry style alteration, and copper-gold mineralisation in the multi-phase intrusive complex. Aurcana's next program of work was carried out over the San Jose zone and consisted of 1,002 soil samples, ground magnetics and one line of induced polarisation (IP) geophysics, all carried out on a cut grid. The soil survey identified an approximately 1.5 km by 2.0 km area of coincident, elevated copper and molybdenum soil geochemistry, spatially associated with an area of altered and veined intrusive rocks. The copper and molybdenum anomaly remained open to the north and is flanked by elevated Zn, Pb and Mn in soil. This zonation is typical of that seen in many Cu-Au-Mo porphyry systems world wide. The copper-molybdenum in soil anomaly had a high magnetic response in the ground magnetic geophysical data. The one line of IP geophysics was carried out in the area of the copper-molydenum soil anomaly. This work returned a high chargeability response, believed to reflect high sulphide content, over the entire breadth of the copper-molybdenum soil anomaly.



In addition to the copper-molybdenum soil anomaly, several Au-Cu soil geochemical anomalies were identified. Of these anomalies, most are associated with known skarn bodies with past copper-gold production but several also constitute new discoveries as they are not spatially associated with known mineralisation or past mining.





62



---





Detailed mapping and sampling by Aurcana of the La Begonia workings identified a skarn-breccia complex measuring approximately 50 metres by 250 metres. The highly porous and permeable nature of the breccia has permitted oxidation and supergene processes to take place. Within the heavily oxidized, sulphide poor skarn-breccia area, average assay values for continuous channel samples (2 m lengths) were taken. This sampling included 34 meters that averaged 1.92 g/t gold, 1.89 g/t silver and 0.55 % copper at the western end of the oxidized area. A 28 meter interval taken 15 meters east of the above interval averaged 5.05 g/t gold, 6.50 g/t silver and 1.80 % copper.



The western end of the same mine level (number4) is in sulphide mineralization rather than oxides as reported above. Copper sulphide minerals consist of chalcopyrite and bornite. Results from five separate vertical channel samples across bedding are as follows:



1.9 meters that averaged 4.37 g/t gold, 5.8 g/t silver and 4.56 % copper.

1.5 meters that averaged 4.69 g/t gold, 27.2 g/t silver and 2.74 % copper.

1.2 meters that averaged 6.61 g/t gold, 18.8 g/t silver and 3.35 % copper.

1.4 meters that averaged 6.67 g/t gold, 45.0 g/t silver and 2.49 % copper.

1.4 meters that averaged 20.58 g/t gold, >100 g/t silver and 6.99 % copper.



Santa Elena Mine

Underground mapping and sampling was also conducted on the Santa Elena Mine, approximately two km north of La Begonia, however access was limited to two stopes due to a high water level in the main access tunnel. While the geological setting at the Santa Elena Mine is similar to La Begonia, the Santa Elena Mine has a lower gold content. In the Santa Elena #3 stope, a 30 metre continuous channel sample averaged 0.31% copper and in the Santa Elena #1 stope, a 16 metre continuous chip sample averaged 0.90% copper. Both areas averaged less than 0.5 g/t gold and 3.5 g/t silver. It appears that most of the past mining and development was from the oxide horizon.



Mapping of the underground workings combined with surface observations identified what appears to be an important structural orientation in the southern portion of the San Jose area. It appears that the gold-copper bearing breccia bodies have formed along north-east trending zones which coincide with several trends identified from results of a soil geochemical survey conducted in late 2001. The significance of this controlling structure and the coincident geochemical trends is the potential to discover additional high-grade breccia-skarn bodies on the property.



The cut grid was extended approximately 1.0 km to the north and provided control to complete a soil geochemical survey. This work, combined with further induced polarization (IP) geophysical surveying and a ground magnetic survey identified a large copper-gold soil anomaly coincident with a chargeability high in the IP results.



In December 2002, Aurcana drilled two diamond drill holes totaling 440 metres to test the Begonia skarn zone.  Due to rugged topography, the drill setup was 150 metres from the area of high grade underground sampling. Both holes were from the same setup and did not intersect any sulphide mineralization in the skarn zone in the western end of Begonia.



A second phase of diamond drilling started in February 2003 to test the approximately 1.5 km by 2.5 km area containing the IP anomaly and elevated copper and gold values in soils. Four holes totaling 765 metres were drilled. All holes targeted a depth of approximately 200 metres and all encountered geology indicative of a porphyry system however grades of copper, molybdenum and gold were low.



During it's last phase of surface work, Aurcana further defined a gold in soils anomaly at the northeastern edge of the surveyed area. An area approximately 300 by 1000 metres averages 0.372 g/t gold in soils, with values ranging between 0.100 and 1.935 g/t. This anomalous area lies over the contact between intrusive rocks and limestone.



Planned Work Program
- Fiscal 2004, Ending December 31, 2004

The Company has no planned Fiscal 2004 exploration program with all work being done by Hawkeye who are earning their interest in the prospect.  Hawkeye is currently designing a work program.



63



---





The Tropico Prospect - Mexico



The Tropico Prospect is without known reserves and all current work by the Company on the prospect is exploratory in nature.



Option to Acquire Interest

The Company's predecessor ("Fairfield"), through its Mexican subsidiary, acquired the Tropico Prospect from Minera BHP, S.A de C.V. ("BHP"), a subsidiary of BHP Billiton, for a nominal consideration. The property is subject to a 2.25% net smelter return payable to BHP.



In Fiscal 1999, Fairfield optioned the property to Santoy Resources Ltd. ("Santoy") who could earn a 60% interest by incurring US$1,000,000 of exploration expenditures and issuing 200,000 shares to the Company. When Santoy's expenditures had reached US$950,000, the Company agreed to accept 110,000 shares of Santoy in lieu of the remaining US$50,000 needed to fulfil the work obligation to earn 60% of the project.



In Fiscal 2001, Fairfield and Santoy entered into an agreement with Sumitomo Metal Mining Company.  The agreement was terminated during Fiscal 2003.



Santoy and the Company acquired the San Pablo concession from the Mexican government in a public auction held in Mexico City on February 22, 2002 for US$150,000, payable in installments. Yearly installments are optional and the joint venture is not obligated to make these if the concession is relinquished. The San Pablo concession is encompassed by the existing land position of the project and is immediately adjacent to the Maricela area.   The Company and Santoy intend to drop the concession in Fiscal 2004.



Expenditures to Date

During Fiscal 2003, the Company incurred $13,284 in acquisition costs and $17,878 in exploration costs on the prospect.  As at December 31, 2003, the Company had deferred acquisition and exploration costs of $52,981, net of write-downs and recoveries, on the property.



Location and Access

The Tropico Prospect is located twenty one kilometres north of Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico and may be accessed via Highway 15 from Mazatlan.  Several other paved and unpaved roads provide access to various parts of the prospect from Highway 15. The centre of the prospect is approximately latitude 23 degrees 27 minutes North and longitude 106 degrees 27 minutes west.



History and Recent Work

There has been limited historic exploration for copper and gold as evidenced by numerous pits and diggings in the area. Consejos Roussos Minerales ("CRM"), the Mexican government mining company, mapped the Marmol quadrangle and carried out soil geochemical and geophysical surveys in the San Pablo area located on the southern margin of the Tropico mining concession after claiming it in 1993



Since 1996, BHP carried out reconnaissance geological mapping at a scale of 1:250,000, photo interpretation and petrographic studies.  This work was followed by more detailed geological mapping at 1:25,000. Mapping revealed copper mineralization associated with a layered mafic plutonic sequence. Selected samples were analyzed for platinum group elements with significant anomalous results.  A stream sediment survey was carried out over the entire concession area resulting in the identification of additional areas of potential.



In 1998, Fairfield acquired the Tropico and Tropico 2 mining concessions from BHP.  The Company carried out limited check sampling of mineral showings which returned anomalous values in copper, silver, gold, platinum and palladium. Santoy also completed check sampling confirming the presence of anomalous platinum, palladium, gold and copper values.



Subsequently, the Company completed four reverse circulation drill holes in an initial test of areas underlain by



64



---

anomalous copper-gold-platinum-palladium mineralization hosted in a mafic igneous complex.



In July 2000 the parties agreed that the Maricela and Tarantula II claims which were acquired by Santoy be included in the agreement.  The claims adjoin the Tropico prospect to the south.



In 2001 Santoy carried out line cutting geochemical rock and soil sampling, geological mapping, and geophysical surveys.  Favourable results from this work resulted in a 1,500 metre trenching program.



Based on trenching results, Santoy planned further trenching and drilling. Subsequent trenching, drilling, geophysics, geochemical, and geological work were financed by Sumitomo with Santoy acting as operator.



Geology and Mineralization

The Tropico Prospect is underlain by a Jurassic-Cretaceous layered mafic igneous complex that intrudes a late Paleozoic basement. The mafic complex is in turn cut by Late Cretaceous-Early Tertiary, diorite that may be the earliest phase of the Sinaloa batholith.  Oligocene volcanic rocks and younger thin alluvium cover much of the area, limiting exposures of older rocks to small outcrop areas on hill tops.



The large mafic igneous complex hosts two main types of mineralization; primary copper sulphide minerals and pyrite with associated gold, platinum and palladium values, and secondary copper mineralization developed by oxidation and weathering of the primary sulfide minerals.



Due to limited outcrop exposure, the thickness of the mineralized zones is unknown.  Limited reverse circulation drilling data indicates that individual zones of mineralization range up to 21 meters in thickness and extend to depths of at least 70 meters.  It should be noted that the intersections may not represent true thickness since more drilling is required to define dimensions of the mineralized zones.



The Maricela and Tarantule II claims are underlain by the same mafic intrusive complex that Santoy has been exploring on the adjoining Tropico prospect.  Results from previous geological mapping and chip sampling, along with grid soil geochemistry and geophysical surveying have outlined a one kilometre wide copper-gold-silver mineralized pyroxenite unit that can be traced for a strike length of 2.5 kilometres



Exploration and Drilling Results

Four reverse circulation drill holes totalling 1980 feet were drilled for 1998 assessment work in two separate areas of economic interest known as Santa Fe and Cerro Capule.  Five foot sample intervals for the entire length of the holes were collected and submitted for preparation to the Chemex Lab in Guadalajara, Mexico, then shipped to Vancouver, British Columbia for thirty two element analyses by ICP methods.  Gold, platinum and palladium metals were extracted by fire assay and analyzed by ICP methods.  Weakly anomalous gold, platinum and palladium values were returned from sampling.  Hole TR-1 intersected 0.5% copper over 9metres.



In 2000, Santoy cut grids and carried out soil sampling that identified an area anomalous in copper, gold and platinum group elements. Prospecting, geological mapping and 30 line kilometres of induced polarization and magnetic surveys were also completed. Several areas had coincident anomalies from both soil geochemistry and geophysics.



In 2001, Santoy completed an approximately 1500 metre trenching program that returned anomalous values in copper, gold, palladium and platinum. Results justified a drilling program to test the trench values at depth.



In February 2002 Sumitomo and Santoy completed a first phase of exploration on the project.  This first phase program totalling US$600,000 was financed by Sumitomo and consisted of fifteen diamond drill holes totalling 2,844 meters targeting three of the seven identified soil geochemical anomalies.  In addition to the drill program 17 trenches, totalling 2,473 meters were completed.  As part of the program, the soil geochemical coverage of the property was extended to cover the most easterly portion of the mafic-ultramafic complex.  Two separate coincident copper-platinum-palladium-gold soil geochemical anomalies have resulted from this work.



A review of the work completed by the Mexican government on San Pablo shows that the favourable geology and



65



---

anomalous Cu/PGM values can be extended for another 1.5 km bringing the overall target to in excess of 3.0 km of strike length.



The following are the key results from the first phase.



Maricela Area -Eight diamond drill holes totaling 1,632 metres were completed on the Maricela area and tested mineralization in trenches 1, 4, 7 and 11.  Seven of the eight drill holes have tested under three of the trenches within a 600 x 300 metre portion of the anomalous trend.  One drill hole is located a further 400 metres to the east.  All of the drill holes on Maricela encountered feldspathic, massive pyroxenite, indicating that the pyroxenitic phases of the ultramafic complex are a minimum of 300 metres thick.  The pyroxenite has been extensively altered to secondary tremolite.  Sulphide mineralization encountered in these holes comprises variable amounts of chalcopyrite, cubanite, bornite, pyrrhotite, and minor pentlandite.  A thick, cumulate phase anorthositic gabbro is interpreted to form the hanging wall unit to the pyroxenite, and a number of surface Cu-PGM occurrences within this unit near the contact remain untested.  The lower (footwall) contact is not exposed on surface, and may be partially covered by overlying younger Tertiary volcanics.  The lower contact is of particular interest for its potential to develop contact style Cu/PGE mineralization.



Four holes drilled in the Maricela area intersected anomalous copper and precious metal values. Hole M-01-01 intersected 110.5 meters that graded 0.34 % copper, 0.14 g/t Platinum, 0.24 g/t Palladium and 0.09 g/t gold. This included 21.0 meters that averaged 0.79 % copper, 0.29 g/t Platinum, 0.63 g/t Palladium and 0.24 g/t gold. Hole M-01-03 intersected 128.1 meters that graded 0.39 % copper, 0.17 g/t Platinum, 0.23 g/t Palladium and 0.15 g/t gold. Hole M-01-04 intersected 127.4 meters that graded 0.36 % copper, 0.18 g/t Platinum, 0.24 g/t Palladium and 0.13 g/t gold. Hole M-02-08 intersected 38.9 meters that graded 0.50 % copper, 0.25 g/t Platinum, 0.34 g/t Palladium and 0.15 g/t gold. This included 10.9 meters that averaged 0.95 % copper, 0.53 g/t Platinum, 0.68 g/t Palladium and 0.31 g/t gold.



Santa Fe Area -The Santa Fe area is located 7.0 kilometres east of Maricela.  A total of four diamond drill holes totalling 728 metres tested two separate strongly anomalous soil and rock geochemical areas outlined by previous programs.  The two areas were each tested with two holes spaced 100 metres apart.



El Capule Area -Three diamond drill holes totalling 485 metres tested under the recently completed trenching in this area, located 10.5 km east of Maricela.  No significant intervals were encountered in any of these holes.



A second phase of exploration was completed in October of 2002. Excavator trenching was carried out over four separate target areas to test coincident favourable geology and anomalous rock and soil geochemical responses.  Three of the targets were located within the eastern portion of the mafic complex, and were up to 13.0 km east of the Maricela area.  A further four trenches were also completed within the Maricela area, bringing the total number of trenches in this area to sixteen. Following this trenching program a second phase of drilling was carried out totaling 1,554 meters in 10 diamond drill holes. Five of these holes tested a 1,100 meter long section of the mafic complex, including the Maricela area. Three holes tested a portion of the projected hangingwall contact area between massive pyroxenite and megacrystic gabbro in the Maricela area. Two short holes tested the El Pochote area 2.4 kilometers east of San Pablo.



Limited induced polarization work and a further three holes were drilled early in 2003, no significant values were encountered.



Infrastructure

All major services are found in Mazatlan, a major city located twenty kilometres to the south of the prospect.  Labour is available in local towns and villages.  There is good road access throughout most of the area and a major highway (Number 15) crosses the western part of the prospect and major power lines also cross the western and eastern portions of the prospect.  A local power line network supplies electricity to villages within the area.



Planned Work Program
- Fiscal 2004, Ending December 31, 2004

The Company has no planned exploration program for Fiscal 2004. A limited metallurgical test indicated low concentrate grades form the material tested. If any new exploration results on the property were encouraging, further



66



---

testing would be indicated to determine how to achieve high concentrate grades. The Company and Santoy plan to seek new joint venture partners.





Item 5.     Operating and Financial Review and Prospects



Operating Results

The amalgamation of Almaden Resources Corporation and Fairfield Minerals Ltd. was completed effective December 31, 2001. The comparative figures on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as at December 31, 2001 include the assets of Almaden Resources Corporation at their carrying value and the assets of Fairfield Minerals Ltd. at fair value. The comparative figures on the Consolidated Statements of Loss and Deficit for the years ended December 31, 2001 report the results of activities of Almaden Resources Corporation.



The following discussion and analysis of the results of operations and the Company's financial position should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes for the year ended December 31, 2003 appearing under Item 17
- Financial Statements and listed under Item 19 - Exhibits.



The Company's consolidated financial statement s
 are stated in Canadian Dollars and are prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP, the application of which, in the case of the Company, conforms in all material respects for the periods presented with U.S. GAAP except as presented in Note 1 7
 to the consolidated financial statements included herein.



The Company is in the business of acquiring and exploring mineral properties and prospects in Canada, the United States and Mexico with the aim of developing them to a stage where they can be exploited at a profit or to arrange joint ventures whereby other companies provide funding for development and exploitation. At that stage, the Company's operations would, to some extent, be dependent on the world market prices of any minerals mined. The Company does not have producing properties and operations on its properties and prospects are exploratory searches for mineable deposits.



Fiscal 2003 compared to Fiscal 2002

The Company's operations during the year ended December 31, 2003 ("Fiscal 2003") produced a net loss of $1,326,305 or $0.06 per share compared to $3,198,025 or $0.16 per share for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 ("Fiscal 2002"). The significant fluctuation in net loss is primarily due to the expense for mineral properties interests write-downs of $105,666 during Fiscal 2003 compared to $2,180,738 during Fiscal 2002.



The Company has no revenue from mining operations. Revenue currently consists of recovery of costs in excess of costs incurred relating to mineral property agreements, interest income, the recovery of tax and mineral exploration tax credits.  Revenue in Fiscal 2003 remained consistent with revenue in Fiscal 2002.



General and administrative costs were $605,763 during Fiscal 2003 compared to $598,753 during Fiscal 2002. General exploration costs were $439,503 in Fiscal 2003 compared to $332,485 in Fiscal 2002. This increase was primarily due to the joint venture program in Eastern Mexico with BHP Billiton.  Non-cash stock option expense was $220,000 during Fiscal 2003 compared to $162,000 during Fiscal 2002.



Fiscal 2002 compared to Fiscal 2001

The Company's loss for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 ("Fiscal 2002") totalled $3,036,025 ($0.16 per share) as compared to $650,095 ($0.05 per share) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 ("Fiscal 2001").  The larger loss in Fiscal 2002 includes the write-down of interests in mineral properties, mostly the Caballo Blanco property in Mexico.



During Fiscal 2002 revenue totalled $122,538 as compared to $30,538 in Fiscal 2001.  Revenue from the Ram property exceeded its carried value and $58,577 was recovered in mining tax credits which is included in other income.  An increase of cash available for investment increased interest income.



During Fiscal 2002 expenses totalled $3,111,976 as compared to $520,513 in Fiscal 2001, including the write-down of interests in mineral properties.  General and administrative expenses increased during Fiscal 2002 mainly due to the completion of the amalgamation and the cost of compliance in both Canada and Mexico including maintaining the Company's listing on the Toronto Stock Exchange.  During Fiscal 2002, the Company changed its lawyers and accountants in Mexico in an attempt to reduce the cost of operating there.  General exploration was more active and,



67



---

as a result, increased during Fiscal 2002.



During Fiscal 2002 the Company incurred a loss on securities of $54,980 as compared to a loss of $164,055 in Fiscal 2001 due to the write-down of common shares held by the Company to the lower of cost or market.  The Company realized a gain of $15,144 during Fiscal 2002 on the sale of fixed assets and a loss on foreign exchange of $6,751 as compared to a gain of $3,935 during Fiscal 2001.



Liquidity and Capital Resources





Fiscal 2003 Ended 12/31/2003

At the end of Fiscal 2003, the Company had working capital of $5,100,785 compared to $1,521,627 at the end of Fiscal 2002 and cash and cash equivalents of $4,838,914 at the end of Fiscal 2003 compared to $ 964,967
 at the end of Fiscal 2002.  The significant increase in cash is primarily due to the issuance of capital stock. In addition, the market value of the Company's inventory of gold bullion at the end of Fiscal 2003 was $859,681 - $584,913 above book value.  The market value of marketable securities at the end of Fiscal 2003 was $1,268,497 - $899,211 above book value. These values differ from the GAAP valuation on the balance sheet which is at the lower of cost or market. Also, included in working capital is a contingent liability in the event the Company is unsuccessful in its appeal of assessed additional mineral tax for prior years. The Company expects its level of cash resources to be sufficient to meet its working capital and mineral exploration requirements for the next several years. The Company has no long-term debt.



Cash used for operating activities during Fiscal 2003 was $911,766 after adjusting for the non-cash activities compared to $855,487 during Fiscal 2002.



Cash flows from financing activities during Fiscal 2003 were $5,779,301 compared to $2,378,605 during Fiscal 2002. This significant increase in sources of cash reflects the success of the Company in raising a total of $4,087,341 through the issue of new shares and the exercise of options and warrants in 2003.



In March 2003, the Company completed a private placement of 80,000 units raising proceeds of $62,780 net of issue costs. In August 2003 the Company completed a private placement of 323,500 units raising proceeds of $247,671 net of issue costs. In September 2003 the Company completed a private placement of 1,700,000 units raising proceeds of $1,160,524 net of issue costs. In October 2003, the Company completed a private placement of 55,000 units and 70,000 common shares raising proceeds of $183,856. In December 2003, the Company completed a private placement of 280,000 units raising proceeds of $413,700 net of issue costs. In December, the Company completed a second private placement of 135,000 units and 5,000 common shares raising proceeds of $294,173 net of issue costs.  In January 2004, the Company completed a private placement of 1,300,000 common shares raising proceeds of $1,699,435 net of issue costs.  These funds were received prior to December 31, 2003 and were recorded as a subscription for shares.  Further details regarding the private placements are disclosed in note 9 to the consolidated financial statements.



During the year the Company received cash proceeds of $1,648,664 and $75,973 pursuant to the exercise of share purchase warrants and stock options, respectively.

Subsequent to December 31, 2003 and up to March 31, 2004, the Company received cash proceeds of $569,461
from the exercise of share purchase warrants and stock options.



During Fiscal 2003, Almaden had net proceeds from the sale of marketable securities in excess of purchases of $244,768 compared to the purchase of marketable securities in excess of sales during Fiscal 2002 of $164,366. $247,879 was invested in property, plant and equipment during Fiscal 2003 primarily the dismantling and moving of the mill, compared to $151,856 during Fiscal 2002, net of proceeds.  Investments of $990,477 were made in mineral properties interests primarily in Mexico an British Columbia during Fiscal 2003 compared to $873,935 during Fiscal 2002. There were no gold sales during Fiscal 2003 compared to $362,906 during Fiscal 2002.





Fiscal 2002 Ended 12/31/2002

The cash and cash equivalents of the Company at the end of Fiscal 2002 amounted to $964,967 compared to $274,100 at the end of Fiscal 2001.  The Company had working capital at the end of Fiscal 2002 of $1,521,627 compared to $860,192 in Fiscal 2001.  Included in working capital is the Company's inventory of gold, acquired on amalgamation with Fairfield, which is recorded at cost of production not market value.  Also included in working





68



---

capital is a contingent liability in the event the Company is unsuccessful in its appeal of assessed additional mineral tax for prior years.  The Company has no long-term debt.



Cash flow from operations, after allowing for the effects of changes in non-cash working capital components, was a use of $855,487 in Fiscal 2002 compared to a use of $296,761 in Fiscal 2001.



Cash provided by the issuance of shares during Fiscal 2002 totalled $2,378,605, net of expenses.  In April 2002, the Company closed a private placement consisting of 2,050,000 Units (50,000 of which are Units paid on commission), at a price of $0.43 per Unit, each Unit consisting of one common share and one-half share purchase warrant with each whole warrant granting the right to purchase one additional common share during the first year at a price of $0.51 per share and during the second year at a price of $0.60 per share.  Also in April 2002, the Company completed a private placement consisting of 200,000 flow-through common shares and 180,000 Units, at a price of $0.55 per share/Unit, each Unit consisting of one common share and one share purchase warrant granting the right to purchase one additional common share during the first year at a price of $0.60  per share and during the second year at a price of $0.65 per share. In October 2002, a private placement consisting of 1,720,000 Units (70,000 of which are Units paid on commission), at a price of $0.55 per Unit, each Unit consisting of one common share and one share purchase warrant with each warrant granting the right to purchase one additional common share during the first year at a price of $0.60 per share and during the second year at a price of $0.70 per share closed.  The Company also issued 134,750 shares on the exercise of share purchase warrants and 122,077 shares in partial consideration for the acquisition of a mill.  Wheaton River Minerals Ltd., having earned a 10% interest in the Elk property by providing $350,000 for exploration, converted its interest into 388,889 shares.



Cash used in Fiscal 2002 for investing activities totalled $832,251 compared to cash provided of $283,262 in Fiscal 2001.  During Fiscal 2002, expenditures on mineral properties increased mostly due to exploration programs undertaken on the Elk, ATW, PV and El Pulpo properties. In March, ATW Resources Ltd., of which the Company has a net 40% interest, entered into a joint venture agreement with Aberex Minerals Ltd. and SouthernEra Resources Limited whereby each party agreed to pay all costs of exploration on the ATW property pro-rata to their interest.  In June, the Company entered into an agreement with Wheaton River Minerals Ltd. whereby Wheaton committed to spend $350,000 on the Elk property.  Several of the Company's properties in Mexico were optioned out to third parties who were incurring all costs to earn their interest in the properties.  In May, the Company entered into an agreement with Ascot Resources Ltd. whereby Ascot had the right to earn an initial 50% interest in the Yago/La Sarda property and in November, the Company entered into an agreement with Grid Capital Corporation whereby Grid has the right to earn an initial 50% interest in the Galeana project.   The Company also entered into an agreement in May with BHP Billiton World Exploration Inc. to undertake exploration in eastern Mexico.  Cash was provided in 2002 on the sale of the Company's inventory of gold, net of cost and taxes payable.  Excess cash balances were used to purchase marketable securities during Fiscal 2002 compared to cash being provided by the sale of marketable securities during Fiscal 2001.  Fixed asset acquisitions increased in 2002, mostly in the acquisition of a mill.  This mill is suitable for the Siwash Gold Property and was available at below replacement cost.  Cash was also provided on the sale of fixed assets during Fiscal 2002.  During Fiscal 2001, cash was acquired on amalgamation.



As none of the Company's properties or prospects are currently in production and consequently, do not produce any revenue, there is little variation expected in operating results from year to year until such time, if any, as a production decision is made on one of its properties or prospects.  The Company is likely to continue incurring annual losses until/unless a significant discovery is made and there is no reassurance this will happen.



Trend information

The mineral exploration industry has been through a very difficult period with low prices for both precious and base metals.  Management believes that the lack of interest lead to low market capitalizations and large companies found it was easier to grow by purchasing companies or mines than to explore for them. This lead to downsizing of large company exploration staffs and many professionals took early retirement or left the industry to pursue other careers. As a result of these trends, there are few good gold-silver projects in the pipeline and a developing shortage of experienced explorationists.  With improving metal prices and increasing demand, especially from Asia, supply difficulties may occur in the future and there is a discernible need for good exploration projects based on sound geological work. As junior companies (many of which are staffed by former large company geologists) find it easier to raise funds, they are beginning to seek properties of merit to explore.



69



---



Off-balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements other than the lease related to its office premises as disclosed below.



Forward looking statements

Certain information included in this discussion may constitute forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and entail various risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties could cause or contribute to actual results that are materially different than those expressed or implied. The Company disclaims any obligation or intention to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.



Contractual Obligations

The Company is obligated under an operating lease for its office premises with the following aggregate minimum lease payments to the expiration of the lease on January 31, 2009.  The Company intends to renew its Rock River coal licenses in July 2004 for a three-year term. All other property options payments on the Company's projects have been assumed by third parties who are earning their interests in the projects.  Table No. 4 lists these contractual obligations.







Table No. 4

Contractual Obligations of the Company



Payments due by periodTotalless
than 1
year1
    - 3
years3
- 5
yearsmore
than 5
yearsOperating lease obligations$189,581$37,473$111,753$40,355-Mineral property acquisition payments32,8674,71228,155--






U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the differences between Canadian and United States generally accepted accounting principles as applicable to the Company's operations.  Under U.S. GAAP, the Company is considered a exploration stage company.  Consequently, U.S. GAAP requires that mineral property costs that are deferred under Canadian GAAP be expensed until there is substantial evidence of the existence of a mineable ore deposit that can be commercially exploited by the Company.  U.S. GAAP requires either the use of a fair based method of accounting for stock options where compensation cost is measured at the date of grant based on the fair value of the options granted and is recognized over the exercise period or the intrinsic value method.  The Company uses the intrinsic value method and as it grants its stock options at market price, no compensation cost is recognized.  Under Canadian GAAP, recognition is at the time the option is exercised.  Under U.S. GAAP the Company classifies its equity securities and long-term investments as available-for-sale securities with any net realized holding gains to be included in other comprehensive income whereas under Canadian GAAP securities are carried at cost unless there is evidence of an impairment which is other than temporary.



Critical Accounting Policies

The Company's significant accounting policies are set out in Note 2 of the audited consolidated financial statements. There are two policies that due to the nature of the mining business may not be readily understood.  These policies relate to the capitalizing of mineral exploration expenditures and the use of estimates.



The Company defers all costs relating to the acquisition and exploration of its mineral properties. Any revenues received from such properties are credited against the costs of the property. If commercial production commenced on any of the Company's properties, all costs would be charged to operations on a unit-of-production method. The Company's management periodically reviews the results of its exploration programs. Any decisions to abandon or reduce exploration efforts on any of its properties would result in a charge to operations when such decision is made. There is not a predetermined hold period for any property as geological or economic circumstances render each property unique.



70



---



Critical accounting estimates

A detailed summary of all the Company's significant accounting policies is included in note 2 to the annual consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003. Significant estimates used in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements include, amongst other things, depreciation, determination of net recoverable value of assets, determination of fair value on taxes, contingencies and share compensation.



Changes in accounting principles

Stock-based compensation

The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants ("CICA") amended the stock option compensation and other stock based payments accounting standard during 2003. The Company early adopted the standard and the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003 reflect this. This change has been applied retroactively and the consolidated financial statements for 2002 have been restated. The effect of this change was to increase the net loss for the year ended December 31, 2002 by $162,000 for a net loss of $3,198,025. Please see note 2(j) and 3 to the consolidated financial statements for further details.

Asset retirement

The CICA issued a new standard relating to asset retirement obligations effective for fiscal years beginning on January 1, 2004. The standard requires the recognition in the financial statements of the liability associated with the net present value of future site reclamation costs when the liability is incurred. These obligations are initially measured at fair value and subsequently adjusted for the accretion of discount and any changes to the underlying costs.  The asset retirement cost is to be capitalized and amortized into operations over time. The Company is currently assessing these requirements to ensure it complies with the new standards starting in 2004.





Item 6.     Directors, Senior Management and Employees



Table No. 5
 lists the directors and senior management of the Company. The directors have served in their respective capacities since their election and/or appointment and will serve until the next annual general meeting or until a successor is duly elected, unless the office is vacated in accordance with the Articles/By-Laws of the Company.  All directors are residents and citizens of Canada.



71



---



Table No. 5

-Directors of the Company

NameAgeDate First Elected or AppointedJames Duane Poliquin
James E. McInnes(1)
John D. McCleary(2)
Joseph Montgomery
Morgan Poliquin(2)
Gerald G. Carlson(1)
Donald Lorimer(1) (2)63
66
63
76
32
58
70February 1, 2002(3)
February 1, 2002(3)
February 1, 2002(3)
February 1, 2002(3)
February 1, 2002(3)
February 1, 2002(3)
November 17, 2003


(1)Member of Audit Committee

(2)Member of Corporate Governance Committee

(3)Date of issue of the Certificate of Amalgamation



Duane Poliquin has been a director of Almaden Resources Corporation since September 1980, James E. McInnes since December 1985, Jack McCleary since June 1991 and Morgan Poliquin since June 1999



Duane Poliquin and James E. McInnes were directors of Fairfield Minerals Ltd., the Company's predecessor, since June 1996, Joseph Montgomery since July 2000 and Gerald G. Carlson since July 1998.



Table No. 6
 lists the Executive Officers of the Company.  The Executive Officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.  All Executive Officers are residents and citizens of Canada.





Table No. 6

Executive Officers of the Company

NamePositionAgeDate First AppointedJames Duane Poliquin
Dione BitzerPresident and Chief Executive
Chief Financial Officer63
43February 1, 2002(4)
February 1, 2002(4)


(4)Date of issue of the Certificate of Amalgamation



Duane Poliquin was appointed an Officer of Almaden Resources Corporation in September 1980 and of Fairfield Minerals Ltd. in June 1996.   Dione Bitzer was appointed an Officer of Fairfield Minerals Ltd. in March 2001.



Duane Poliquin is a registered professional geological engineer with over 40 years experience in mineral exploration and the founding shareholder of Almaden Resources Corporation. He gained international experience with major mining companies where he participated in several important mine discoveries. Mr. Poliquin has held executive positions with several junior resource companies over his career and was President of Westley Mines Ltd. when that company discovered the Santa Fe gold deposit in Nevada. He has recently agreed to become a director or Motapa Diamonds Inc. ("Motapa"), a private company exploring for diamonds in Africa. Motapa plans to do a public financing during 2004. Mr. Poliquin spends all of his time of the affairs of the Company and is the father of Morgan Poliquin.



James E. McInnes is a retired lawyer and a geologist with over 40 years experience in mineral exploration and mining law. He has held executive positions with several junior resource companies over his career. He also serves as a director and President of Williams Creek Explorations Limited, a gold, copper and diamond exploration company listed on the TSX Venture Exchange ("TSX-V) and Horseshoe Gold Mining Inc., a diamond exploration company listed on the TSX-V. Mr. McInnes spends about one-third of his time on the affairs of the Company.



Jack McClearyis a registered professional geologist with 40 years experience in petroleum and mineral exploration. He has held executive positions with several junior resource companies over his career and for several years was a Vice President of Dominion Securities Ltd. He served as a director and President of Canadian Hydro Developers Inc. until December 1995 at which time he retired and as a director and President of Troymin Resources Ltd. until April 2003 at which time Troymin amalgamated with Santoy Resources Ltd. where he serves as a director. Santoy Resources Ltd. is a precious and base metals, coal and coal bed methane and diamond exploration company listed on the TSX-V.



72



---



Joseph Montgomery,Ph.D., P.Eng. is a professional engineer registered with the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of B.C. He has over 40 years experience in the mineral industry primarily as a consultant in base and precious metals, industrial metals and gemstones. He is President of Montgomery Consultants Ltd. and is on the Advisory Board of the Canadian Institute of Gemology. Mr. Montgomery also serves as a director of the following junior resource companies:



a.

Abitibi Mining Corp., a company with lead and zinc property holdings listed on the TSX-V.

b.

Sedex Mining Corp., a company with lead and zinc property holdings listed on the TSX-V.

c.

Anglo Minerals Ltd., a company with coal and tar sands deposits listed on the TSX-V.

d.

Better Resources Ltd., a copper exploration company listed on the TSX-V.

e.

Comcorp Ventures Inc., a gold and base metals exploration company listed on the TSX-V.



Morgan Poliquin, M.Sc., is a registered professional geological engineer with 10 years experience in mineral exploration. He is the son of Duane Poliquin. He has a B.A.Sc. degree in geological engineering from the University of British Columbia and a M.Sc. in geology from the University of Auckland, 1996. He also serves as a director of Williams Creek Explorations Limited, a gold, copper and diamond exploration company listed on the TSX-V.



Gerald G. Carlson,Ph.D., P.Eng, has been involved in mineral exploration and junior exploration company management for over 30 years. Mr. Carlson has a B.A.Sc. from the University of Toronto, a M.Sc. from Michigan Technological University and Ph. D. from Dartmouth College. He is past President of ConSil Corp. and past Vice President of Exploration for Dentonia Resources Ltd.  Mr. Carlson became President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of La Teko Resources Ltd. in December 1996, a position he held until the acquisition of La Teko by Kinross Gold Corporation in February 1999. Since 199, he has been President and CEO of Copper Ridge Explorations Inc. and he holds the position of Chairman of IMA Exploration Inc. He is a past President of the B.C. and Yukon Chamber of Mines, President of the Society of Economic Geologists Canada Foundation and a member of the Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia, the Professional Engineers of the Yukon Territory and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy & Petroleum. Mr. Carlson also serves as a director or officer of the following junior resource companies:



a.

President of Copper Ridge Explorations Inc., a gold and copper exploration company listed on the TSX-V.

b.

Director of Nevada Star Resource Corp., a platinum, nickel and copper exploration company listed on the

TSX-V and NASDAQ Bulletin Board.

c.

Chairman of IMA Exploration Inc., a silver, gold exploration company listed on the TSX-V.

d.

Director of Dentonia Resources Ltd., a diamond exploration company listed on the TSX-V.

e.

Director of Orphan Boy Resources Inc., a gold and base metals exploration company listed on the TSX-V.

f.

Director of Canden Capital Corp., a gold and base metals exploration company listed on the

TSX-V.



Donald M. Lorimer is a portfolio manager with Odlum Brown Ltd.  Mr. Lorimer qualified as a Chartered Accountant with Price Waterhouse & Co. and subsequently was a financial executive with Patino Mining Corporation and Little Long Lac Gold Mines Ltd.  In 1971 he joined A.E. Ames & Co. and became a director and vice president responsible for corporate and government underwriting in British Columbia.



Dione Bitzeris a Certified Management Accountant with over 20 years accounting experience with junior exploration companies. She has held executive positions with several junior resource companies. She also serves as Secretary of Williams Creek Explorations Limited, a gold, copper and diamond exploration company listed on the TSX-V.  Miss Bitzer spends about three-quarters of her time on the affairs of the Company.



No director and/or executive officer has been the subject of any order, judgment, or decree of any governmental agency or administrator or of any court or competent jurisdiction, revoking or suspending for cause any license, permit or other authority of such person or of any corporation of which he is a director and/or executive officer, to engage in the securities business or in the sale of a particular security or temporarily or permanently restraining or enjoining any such person or any corporation of which he is an officer or director from engaging in or continuing any conduct, practice, or employment in connection with the purchase or sale of securities, or convicting such person of any felony or misdemeanor involving a security or any aspect of the securities business or of theft or of any felony.  Seine River Resources Inc. (now Trinity Plumas Capital Corp.), of which James E. McInnes was a director was subject to a cease-trade order as of July 24, 1996, subject to the submission of overdue documentation, which was revoked on August 8, 1996.  Williams Creek Explorations Limited, of which James E. McInnes and Morgan Poliquin are directors and Dione Bitzer an officer, was subject to a cease-trade order as of July 22, 1999, subject to



73



---

the submission of overdue documentation, which was revoked on August 5, 1999. Joseph Montgomery was subject to a cease trade order in the securities of Home Ventures Ltd. as of May 23, 1996 for failure to file insider reports, which was revoked on June 14, 1996.



There are no arrangements or understandings with any two or more directors or executive officers pursuant to which he was selected as a director or executive officer.



The Company has no formal plan for compensating its directors for their service in their capacity as directors.  Directors are entitled to reimbursement for reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors may award special remuneration to any director undertaking any special services on behalf of the Company other than services ordinarily required of a director. Other than indicated below no director received any compensation for his services as a director, including committee participation and/or special assignments.



Total compensation paid by the Company directly and/or indirectly to all directors and executive officers during Fiscal 2003 ended December 31, 2003 was $243,539.



Table No. 7

Summary Compensation Table



Long-Term CompensationAnnual CompensationAwardsName
    and
    Priciple
    Position
  Fiscal YearSalaryBonus
  Other
    Annual CompenationRestricted
    Stock Awards
  Options/ SARS
  GrantedLTIP PayoutsAll other
  CompensationDuane Poliquin
President, Director &
Chief Executive Officer2003
2002
2001Nil
Nil
NilNil
Nil
NilNil
Nil
Nil
  
  Nil
Nil
Nil
  Nil
375,000
91,092Nil
Nil
Nil$110,400
102,000
13,0001)James E. McInnes
Secretary & Director2003
2002
2001Nil
Nil
NilNil
Nil
NilNil
Nil
NilNil
Nil
NilNil
25,000
NilNil
Nil
NilNil
Nil
NilJack McCleary
Director2003
2002
2001Nil
Nil
NilNil
Nil
NilNil
Nil
NilNil
Nil
NilNil
50,000
NilNil
Nil
NilNil
Nil
NilJoseph Montgomery
Director2003
2002
2001Nil
Nil
NilNil
Nil
NilNil
Nil
NilNil
Nil
NilNil
25,000
NilNil
Nil
NilNil
Nil
NilMorgan Poliquin
Director2003
2002
2001Nil
Nil
NilNil
Nil
NilNil
Nil
NilNil
Nil
Nil250,000
375,000
NilNil
Nil
Nil$80,064
68,300
43,550(2)Gerald G. Carlson
Director2003
2002
2001Nil
Nil
NilNil
Nil
NilNil
Nil
NilNil
Nil
NilNil
25,000
NilNil
Nil
NilNil
Nil
NilDonald M. Lorimer
Director2003
2002
2001Nil
N/A
N/ANil
N/A
N/ANil
N/A
N/ANil
N/A
N/A50,000
N/A
N/ANil
N/A
N/ANil
N/A
N/ADione Bitzer
Chief Financial Officer2003
2002
2001Nil
Nil
NilNil
Nil
NilNil
Nil
NilNil
Nil
Nil112.000
40,000
NilNil
Nil
Nil$53,075
48,400
Nil(3)


(1)For geological services provided to the Company by Hawk Mountain Resources Ltd., a company owned

by Duane Poliquin and his
wife.  Hawk Mountain Resources Ltd. was also paid $96,000 during 2001 for

management and geological technical services provided to Fairfield Minerals Ltd. (the Company's

predecessor).

(2) For geological services provided by Kohima Pacific Gold Corp., a company owned by Morgan Poliquin.

Kohima Pacific Gold Corp.
was also paid $22,750 during 2001 for geological services provided to Fairfield

Minerals Ltd. (the Company's predecessor) and its subsidiary.

(3)Miss Bitzer was appointed an officer of the Company's predecessor (Fairfield) in March 2001.  Miss

Bitzer  was paid a total of $45,375
by the Company and Fairfield for accounting services provided during

2001.



74





---

Stock options

Incentive stock options to purchase securities from the Company are granted to directors, executive officers, employees and contractors of the Company on terms and conditions acceptable to the regulatory authorities in Canada, notably the Toronto Stock Exchange and the Ontario Securities Commission.



Incentive stock options previously granted by the Company and its predecessor, which, by the terms of the amalgamation, become options granted by the Company, are not options granted under the Company's formal stock option plan.



Under the Company's formal written stock option plan, incentive stock options for up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance and may be granted from time to time provided that incentive stock options in favour of any one individual not exceed 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock.  No incentive stock option granted under the stock option programis transferable by the optionee other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and each incentive stock option is exercisable during the lifetime of the optionee only by such optionee.



The exercise price of all incentive stock options granted under the stock option plan are determined in accordance with Ontario Securities Commission guidelines and must be calculated using the average of the daily high and low board lot trading prices of the common shares over the five days immediately preceding and including the date of grant, but shall not be lower than the closing price on the trading day immediately preceding the day on which the option is granted.  The maximum term of each incentive stock option may not exceed five years.



The names and titles of the directors and executive officers of the Company or the Company's predecessor to whom outstanding stock options have been granted and the number of common shares subject to such options as of April 30, 2004 are set forth in Table No. 8
, as well as the number of options granted to directors, executive officers, employees and contractors as a group.



75



---

Table No. 8

Stock Options Outstanding



NameNumber of  Options OutstandingExercise Price CDN$Expiry DateDuane Poliquin,
President, Director &
Chief Executive Officer


James E. McInnes,
Director


Jack McCleary
Director

Morgan Poliquin
Director





Gerald G. Carlson
Director

Donald Lorimer
Director

Dione Bitzer
Chief Financial Officer

Total Directors/Officers (7 persons)
Total Employees/Consultants (6persons)
Total Directors/Officers/Employees/Consultants310,000
91,092
375,000
324,371

160,000
25,000
135,520

50,000
53,900

77,000
60,000
375,000
250,000
130,900
154,000

50,000
25,000

40,000


37,000
75,000

2,798,783
242,000
3,040,785$0.30
0.27
0.55
0.45

0.30
0.55
0.45

0.55
0.45

0.49
0.30
0.55
0.80
0.45
0.388

0.30
0.55

1.37


0.80
0.7403/01/2006
08/23/2006
02/28/2007
10/07/2008

03/01/2006
02/28/2007
10/07/2008

02/28/2007
10/07/2008

05/04/2005
03/01/2006
02/28/2007
02/26/2008
10/07/2008
12/01/2009

03/01/2006
02/28/2007

09/26/2008


02/26/2008
04/07/2008




No funds were set aside or accrued by the Company during Fiscal 2003 to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for directors or executive officers



Board Committees

The directors of the Company are elected annually `and hold office until the next annual general meeting or until a successor is duly elected, unless the office is vacated in accordance with the Articles/By-Laws of the Company.  All officers serve at the pleasure of the Board.



The Board of Directors currently has two committees: the Audit Committee and the Corporate Governance Committee. The members of both committees do not have any fixed terms for holding their positions, are appointed by resolution of the Board of Directors and do not receive any separate remuneration for acting as members of the committees.



As Noted in the Company's proxy solicitation material for the Annual General Meeting scheduled for June 4, 2004:



"All of the members of the committees have been determined by the Board to be unrelated directors, such determination being made in accordance with the TSX Guidelines, taking into consideration any relationship an individual director may have with the Company and if such relationship could be perceived to materially interfere



76



---

with the director's ability to act with a view to the best interest of the Company.  Mandates of each of the committees will undergo review to bring them into line with any new Canadian and U.S. governance requirements as these requirements are finalized and determined by the Board to be applicable and appropriate to the Company and its operations.  Any revisions to the mandates will be available on the Company's website at www.almadenminerals.com.



Audit Committee

The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Donald Lorimer, James E. McInnes and Gerald Carlson. The committee is responsible for reviewing the Company's financial reporting procedures, internal controls and the performance of the Company's external auditors. In addition, that committee is also responsible for reviewing the annual financial statements prior to their approval by the full Board and is available for consultation by management or the Auditors of the Company. The Audit Committee has met once this year.



Corporate Governance Committee

Members of the Corporate Governance Committee are Messrs. Donald Lorimer, Jack McCleary and Morgan Poliquin. That committee was responsible for making recommendations to the Board with respect to developments in the area of corporate governance, the practices of the Board, and appropriate candidates for nomination to the Board, and for evaluating the performance of the Board."



The Company currently operates with six persons in Canada, of which two are administrative personnel and four are exploration personnel, some of which are retained on a contractual basis. There are no full time employees in the United States or Mexico. None of the Company's employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement.  There are no plans to add any additional personnel, other than independent contractors retained to assist in the exploration of the Company's mineral properties.



Table No. 9
 lists, as of April 30, 2004, directors and executive officers who beneficially own the Company's voting securities and the amount of the Company's voting securities owned by the directors and executive officers as a group.



Table No. 9

Shareholdings of Directors and Executive Officers



Title ofAmounts and Nature ofPercent ofClassName of Beneficial OwnerBeneficial OwnershipClass*Common
Common
Common
Common
Common
Common
Common
CommonDuane Poliquin
James E. McInnes
Jack McCleary
Joseph Montgomery
Morgan Poliquin
Gerald G. Carlson
Donald Lorimer
Dione Bitzer
Total Directors/Officers2,736,637(1)
724,197(2)
292,550(3)
-
1,424,579(4)
76,000(5)
50,000(6)
127,855(7)
5,431,8188.8%
2.4%
1.0%
-
4.5%
0.3%
0.2%
0.4%
17.6%


(1)

Of these shares 1,100,463 represent currently exercisable stock options. 69,300 of these shares are held indirectly by Hawk Mountain Resources Ltd., a company owned by Mr. Poliquin and his wife.

(2)

Of these shares 320,520 represent currently exercisable stock options and 77,000 represent currently exercisable warrants. 239,470 of these shares are held indirectly through Laredo Investments Ltd., private company controlled by Mr. McInnes.

(3)

Of these shares 103,900 represent currently exercisable stock options. 38,500 of these shares are held indirectly by Connemara Resource Ventures Ltd., a company owned by Mr. McCleary.

(4)

Of these shares 1,046,900 represent currently exercisable stock options.

(5)Of these shares 75,000 represent currently exercisable stock options.

(6)Of these shares 40,000 represent currently exercisable stock options.(7)

Of these shares 112,000 represent currently exercisable stock option.



*Based on 30,137,517 shares outstanding as of April 30, 2004 and stock options and warrants held by each beneficial owner.

Item 7.     Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions





77



---



The Company is a publicly owned Canadian corporation, the shares of which are owned by residents of the United States, residents of Canada and other foreign residents. To the extent known by the directors and executive officers of the Company, the Company is not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation and other than described above in Table 9
, there are no other persons or companies beneficially owning more than 5% of the common shares of the Company.



Certain geological and technical services were provided to the Company and its subsidiary by two directors and/or companies controlled by directors. These directors and the companies controlled by them are as follows:



(a)  Duane Poliquin operates through the private company Hawk Mountain Resources Ltd.

(b)  Morgan Poliquin operates through the private company Kohima Pacific Gold Corp.



The costs of such services for Fiscal 2003 ended December 31, 2003 were $190,464, $170,300 in Fiscal 2002 and $56,660 in Fiscal 2001 (refer to footnotes following Table 6).



Certain officers and directors of the Company are also officers or directors of companies with which the Company has agreements and may not be considered at arm's-length to such agreements. However, any agreement or any to be negotiated between the Company and such other companies has been or will be approved by independent directors of the Company, in accordance with the common law and the provisions of the B.C. Company Act and Business Corporations Act
..



The Company, Williams Creek Explorations Limited and Troymin Resources Ltd. (now Santoy Resources Ltd.) are all shareholders in ATW Resources Ltd. and all hold an interest in the ATW property. As confirmed by a declaration of trust dated January 1, 2001, ATW Resources Ltd. acts as trustee holding the Company's beneficial 30% interest in the project. The Company and Santoy each hold a 50% interest in the Rock River Coal leases. The Company holds a 75% interest and Santoy holds a 25% interest in the Prospector Mountain prospect.  The Company has 100% interest in the Fuego prospect to which Horseshoe Gold Mining Inc. has an option to earn an interest.



Other than as disclosed above, there have been no transactions or proposed transactions, which have materially affected or will materially affect the Registrant in which any director, executive officer, or beneficial holder of more that 10% of the outstanding common stock, or any of their respective relatives, spouses, associates or affiliates has had or will have any direct or material indirect interest. As stated above, management believes the transactions referenced above were on terms at least as favorable to the Company as the Company could have obtained from unaffiliated parties.





Item 8.     Financial Information



The financial statements as required under Item 8 are attached hereto and found immediately following the text of this Annual Report.  The audit report of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent Chartered Accountants, is included immediately preceding the financial statements.



The Company's predecessor ("Fairfield") was involved in legal proceedings resulting from a charge by a shareholder that Fairfield made false statements with regard to the estimated contained gold in the Siwash gold deposit. The plaintiff also charged that Fairfield did not reveal details of the underground development and test mining operations that he felt should have been made public. The plaintiff was claiming $100,000 in damages. This action was commenced on October 20, 1997 in British Columbia in the Supreme Court, Action No. C975641. The matter went to trial in November 1999. On July 4, 2000 the plaintiff's claims were dismissed with costs.



The original owner of the El Encuentro, Mexico prospect has sued the Company's wholly owned subsidiary, Almaden de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., to have the property returned on grounds that he is not receiving a royalty. He was paid US$100,000 by Eldorado Gold Corporation which was payment in full for the property and retains a net smelter return royalty. The agreement with the original owner does not provide for a royalty if there is no mine in operation. The Company considers the lawsuit trivial and is defending this action.



Other than the above, the Company knows of no other material, active or pending legal proceedings against them; nor is the Company involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation.



78



---





Other than the above, the Company knows of no active or pending proceedings against anyone that might materially adversely affect an interest of the Company.



The Company has not declared any dividends since inception and does not anticipate that it will do so in the foreseeable future. The present policy of the Company is to retain future earnings for use in its operations and the expansion of its business.



There have been no significant changes of financial condition since the most recent audited financial statements included within this Annual Report.





Item 9.     Offer and Listing of Securities



The Company's common shares trade on The Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX") in Toronto, Ontario, Canada having the symbol "AMM" and CUSIP #020283107.  The Company's common shares commenced trading on February 11, 2002.  On February 8, 2002, the common shares of the Company's predecessor, Fairfield Minerals Ltd., were delisted from both the TSX and the Canadian Venture Exchange and the common shares of Almaden Resources Corporation were delisted from the Canadian Venture Exchange.



Table No. 10
 lists the high and low prices for shares of Almaden Minerals Ltd. common stock for the two years since amalgamation. Table No. 11
 lists the high and low prices for shares of Almaden Resources Corporation common stock for the three years prior to amalgamation. Table No. 12
 lists the high and low prices for the shares of Fairfield Minerals Ltd. common stock for the three years prior to amalgamation.



Table No. 10

Almaden Minerals Ltd.

Stock Trading Activity

The Toronto Stock Exchange



Year EndedHighLow12/31/2003
12/31/2002$2.42
$0.87$0.61
$0.32




Table No. 11

Almaden Resources Corporation

Stock Trading Activity

The Canadian Venture Exchange



Year EndedHighLow12/31/2001
12/31/2000
12/31/1999$0.30
0.50
0.45$0.12
0.15
0.20




Table No. 12

Fairfield Minerals Ltd.

Stock Trading Activity

The Toronto Stock Exchange



Year EndedHighLow12/31/2001
12/31/2000
12/31/1999$0.30
0.55
0.77$0.17
0.20
0.25




79



---



Table No. 1 3
 lists the quarterly high and low prices for shares of Almaden Minerals Ltd. common stock for the two most recent full financial years and subsequent quarter.



Table No. 1 3

Almaden Minerals Ltd.

Stock Trading Activity

The Toronto Stock Exchange



Quarter EndedHighLow03/31/2004$2.75$1.9512/31/20032.421.2709/30/20031.490.6606/30/20030.900.6103/31/20030.920.6312/31/20020.750.4609/30/20020.800.5006/30/20020.870.6103/31/20020.780.25




Table No. 1 4
 lists the high and low prices for shares of Almaden Minerals Ltd. common stock for the most recent six months.

Table No. 1 4

Almaden Minerals Ltd.

Stock Trading Activity

The Toronto Stock Exchange



Month EndedHighLow04/30/2004
03/31/2004
02/29/2004
01/31/2004

12/31/2003
11/30/2003$2.63
2.60
2.62
2.75

2.42
1.90$1.70
2.15
1.95
2.05

1.65
1.52




The closing price of the Company's common stock was $2.00 on April 30, 2004.



In recent years, securities markets in Canada have experienced a high level of price and volume volatility, and the market price of many resource companies, particularly those considered speculative exploration companies, have experienced wide fluctuations in price which have not necessarily been related to operating performance or underlying asset values on prospects of such companies.  Exploration for gold and other minerals is considered high risk and highly speculative in the resource industry and the trading market for precious and base metal exploration companies is characteristically volatile, with wide fluctuations of price and volume only in part related to progress of exploration.  There can be no assurance that continual fluctuations in the Company's share price and volume will not occur.



The Company's common stock is issued in registered form and the following information is from the Company's registrar and transfer agent, Pacific Corporate Trust Company located in Vancouver, British Columbia and Toronto, Ontario, Canada.



On April 30, 2004, the shareholders' list for the Company's common shares showed 222 registered shareholders and 30,137,517 shares outstanding. 174 of these registered shareholders are U.S. residents, owning 7,799,041shares



80



---

representing 25.9% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock.



The Company has researched the indirect holdings by depositories and other financial institutions and believes it has in excess of 300 shareholders of its common stock.



The Company is unaware of any active market in the United States for its common shares.  The Registrant's common shares are not registered to trade in the United States in the form of American Depository Receipts (ADR's) or similar certificates.





Item 10.      Additional Information



Share purchase warrants

At April 30, 2004 there were non-transferable share purchase warrants outstanding to acquire a total of 2,184,105 shares of the Company's common stock. These share purchase warrants were issued pursuant to private placement financings. If the shares purchase warrants are exercised during the first four months following their issuance, the shares issued will be subject to a hold period imposed by the Toronto Stock Exchange and the Ontario Securities Commission expiring at the end of the four month period.



Table No. 1 5
 lists, as of April 30, 2004, share purchase warrants outstanding, the issuance date, the exercise price, and the expiration date f the warrants.



Table No. 1 5

Outstanding Share Purchase Warrants



AmountExercise PriceExpiry DateCDN$115,500
103,750
27,500
140,000
68,355
1,729,000$0.469
$0.80
$1.60
$1.85
$2.25
$1.25/$1.50/$1.75/$2.00/$2.25(1)10/01/2004
08/07/2005
10/28/2004
12/30/2005
12/30/2005
09/18/2008


(1)In the event that anytime after September 18, 2004, the weighted average trading price of the Company's common shares for any 20 consecutive trading days is $0.50 or more above the then current exercise price (the twentieth such trading day being the
"Determination"), the Company agrees to immediately notify the Holder (the "Notice of Expiry") of the accelerate expiry date, which is a date not less than the thirtieth calendar day following the date of the Notice of Expiry (the
"Accelerated Expiry Date"). All warrants not exercised by the expiration of the Accelerated Expiry Date shall be deemed cancelled without further notice of the Holders.



Flow-Through Shares

The Company's common shares are not normally flow-through shares but the Company has issued flow-through shares pursuant to private placements of the Company's common shares.  Flow-through shares differ from other common shares in one aspect only, all other rights of the shareholder remain unchanged. Companies must specifically identify the expenditures associated with the funds raised through the sale of flow-through shares.  Companies raising capital through flow-through shares must expend the funds on natural resources/exploration development in Canada. The tax benefits (depreciation, amortization, etc.) connected with the expenditures flow through to the shareholder rather than corporation. These tax benefits are available only to shareholders residing in Canada. Shareholders residing in the United States and other non-Canadian shareholders, receive no tax benefits through the purchase of flow-through shares.



On March 13, 2003, the Company closed a private placement of 80,000 Units at a price of $0.80 per Unit. Each Unit consists of one flow-through common share and one-half share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the purchaser to purchase one additional common share of the Company at a price of $0.95 per share for one year. All purchasers are Canadian residents.



On August 7, 2003, the Company closed a private placement of 323,500 Units at a price of $0.80 per Unit. Each



81



---

Unit consists of one flow-through common share and one-half share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the purchaser to purchase one additional common share of the Company at a price of $0.80 per share for two years. All purchasers are Canadian residents.



On October 28, 2003, the Company closed a private placement of 55,000 Units and 70,000 flow-through common shares at a price of $1.50 per Unit/share. Each Unit consists of one flow-through common share and one-half share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the purchaser to purchase one additional common share of the Company at a price of $1.60 per share for one year. All purchasers are Canadian residents.



On December 30, 2003, the Company closed a private placement of 135,000 Units and 5,000 flow-through common shares at a price of $2.15 per Unit/share. Each Unit consists of one flow-through common share and one-half share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the purchaser to purchase one additional common share of the Company at a price of $2.25 per share for two years. All purchasers are Canadian residents.



Memorandum and Articles of Association

The Memorandum and Articles of the Company remain unchanged from the Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on May 17, 2002.



Material Contracts

The following is a summary of each material contract, other than contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business, to which we or any member of the group is a party, for the two years preceding the date of this document.



1.   Option agreement dated April 10, 2003 between the Company and Ross River Minerals Inc. ("Ross River") whereby Ross River has the right to earn a 60% interest in the El Pulpo property (based on the Company's own option on the property) by spending US$3,000,000, issuing 425,000 shares of Ross River to the Company by April 30, 2010 and making all payments to the property vendor that come due during the earn-in period.



2.

Option agreement dated May 28, 2003 between Minera Gavilan, S.A. de C.V. (the Company's subsidiary) and Eduberto Garcia Ramirez whereby the Company has the option to acquire a 100% interest in the Los Frailes and Polo properties for payments totalling US$150,000 and a 1% net smelter royalty.



3.   Joint Venture agreement dated June 20, 2003 between the Company and Expatriate Resources Ltd. ("Expatriate") replacing previous agreement between the Company and other various joint venture partners. All matters within the previous agreement remain unchanged.



4.      Letter agreement dated August 21, 2003 between the Company and Kobex Resources Ltd. ("Kobex")

whereby Kobex has the right to earn a 60% interest in the MOR, Caribou Creek and Cabin Lake prospects by spending $1,000,000 and issuing 500,000 shares of Kobex to the Company by August 31, 2008.



5.

Option agreement dated February 11, 2004 between the Company and Grid Capital
Corporation ("Grid) whereby Grid has the right to earn a 60% interest in the
Guadalupe prospect by spending US$2,000,000, issuing 500,000 shares of Grid to the Company by December 31, 2008.



6.

Option agreement dated February 11, 2004 between the Company and Horseshoe Gold Mining Inc. ("Horseshoe") whereby Horseshoe has the right to earn a 60% interest in the Fuego prospect by spending US$3,000,000 and issuing 1,000,00 0
 shares of Horseshoe to the Company by December 31, 2007.



7.

Joint venture agreement dated February 11, 2004 between the Company and Horseshoe Gold Mining Inc. ("Horseshoe") detailing the operations of the joint venture if and when Horsehoe earns its 60% interest in the Fuego prospect.

8.

Option agreement dated March 1, 2004 between the Company and Consolidated Spire Ventures Ltd. ("Spire") whereby Spire has the right to earn a 60% interest in the PV and Nic prospects by spending $1,300,000 and issuing 600,000 shares of Spire to the Company by December 31, 2007.

9.

Option agreement dated March 4, 2004 between the Company and Hawkeye Gold &
Diamond Inc. ("Hawkeye") whereby Hawkeye has the right to earn a 60%
interest in the San Carlos prospect by spending





82





---

10.

US$4,000,000 and issuing 800,000 shares of Hawkeye to the Company within seven years.



Exchange controls

Except as discussed above, the Company is not aware of any Canadian federal or provincial laws, decrees or regulations that restrict the export or import of capital, including foreign exchange controls, or that affect the remittance of interest, dividends or other payments to non-Canadian holders of the common shares.  There are no limitations on the right of non-Canadian owners to hold or vote the common shares imposed by Canadian federal or provincial law or by the charter or other constituent documents of the Company.



The Investment Canada Act(the "IC Act") governs acquisitions of Canadian business by a non-Canadian person or entity. The IC Actrequires a non-Canadian (as defined in the IC Act) making an investment to acquire control of a Canadian business, the gross assets of which exceed certain defined threshold levels, to file an application for review with the Investment Review Division of Industry Canada.  The IC Actprovides, among other things, for a review of an investment in the event of acquisition of "control" in certain Canadian businesses in the following circumstances:



1.  If the investor is a non-Canadian and is a national of a country belonging to the North American Free Trade Agreement ("NAFTA") and/or the World Trade Organization ("WTO") ("NAFTA or WTO National"), any direct acquisition having an asset value exceeding $179,000,000 is reviewable. This amount is subject to an annual adjustment on the basis of a prescribed formula in the IC Actto reflect inflation and real growth within Canada.  This threshold level does not apply in certain sections of Canadian industry, such as uranium, financial services (except insurance), transportation services and cultural services (i.e. the publication, distribution or sale of books, magazines, periodicals (other than printing or typesetting businesses), music in print or machine readable form, radio, television, cable and satellite services; the publication, distribution, sale or exhibition of film or video recordings on audio or video music recordings), to which lower thresholds as prescribed in the IC Actare applicable.



2.  If the investor is a non-Canadian and is not a NAFTA or WTO National, any direct acquisition having an asset value exceeding $5,000,000 and any indirect acquisition having an asset value exceeding $50,000,000 is reviewable.



3.  If the investor is a non-Canadian and is NAFTA or WTO National, an indirect acquisition of control is reviewable if the value of the assets of the business located in Canada represents more than 50% of the asset value of the transaction or the business is involved in uranium, financial services, transportation services or cultural services (as set forth above).



Finally, certain transactions prescribed in the IC Actare exempted from review altogether.



In the context of the Company, in essence, three methods of acquiring control of a Canadian business are regulated by the IC Act: (i) the acquisition of all or substantially all of the assets used in carrying on business in Canada; (ii) the acquisition, directly or indirectly, of voting shares of a Canadian corporation carrying on business in Canada; or (iii) the acquisition of voting shares of an entity which controls, directly or indirectly, another entity carrying on business in Canada.



An acquisition of a majority of the voting shares of a Canadian entity, including a corporation, is deemed to be an acquisition of control under the IC Act.  However, under the IC Act, there is a rebuttable presumption that control is acquired if one-third of the voting shares of a Canadian corporation or an equivalent undivided interest in the voting shares of such corporation are held by a non-Canadian person or entity.  An acquisition of less than one-third of the voting shares of a Canadian corporation is deemed not to be an acquisition of control.  An acquisition of less than a majority, but one-third or more, of the voting shares of a Canadian corporation is presumed to be an acquisition of control unless it can be established that, on the acquisition, the Canadian corporation is not, in fact, controlled by the acquirer through the ownership of voting shares. For partnerships, trusts, joint ventures or other unincorporated Canadian entities, an acquisition of less than a majority of the voting interests is deemed not to be an acquisition of control.



In addition, if a Canadian corporation is controlled by a non-Canadian, the acquisition of control of any other Canadian corporation by such corporation may be subject to the prior approval of the Investment Review Division, unless it can be established that the Canadian corporation is not in fact controlled by the acquirer through the ownership of voting shares.



Where an investment is reviewable under the IC Act, the investment may not be implemented unless it is likely to be





83

---

of net benefit to Canada.  If an applicant is unable to satisfy the Minister responsible for Industry Canada that the investment is likely to be of net benefit to Canada, the applicant may not proceed with the investment.  Alternatively, an acquirer may be required to divest control of the Canadian business that is the subject of the investment.



In addition to the foregoing, the IC Actprovides for formal notification under the IC Actof all other acquisitions of control by Canadian businesses by non-Canadian investors.  The notification process consists of filing a notification within 30 days following the implementation of an investment, which notification is for information, as opposed to review, purposes.



Taxation

The following summary of the material Canadian federal income tax consequences generally applicable in respect of the common stock reflects the Company's opinion.  The tax consequences to any particular holder of common stock will vary according to the status of that holder as an individual, trust, corporation or member of a partnership, the jurisdiction in which that holder is subject to taxation, the place where that holder is resident and, generally, according to that holder's particular circumstances.  This summary is applicable only to holders who are resident in the United States, have never been resident in Canada, deal at arm's length with the Company, hold their common stock as capital property and who will not use or hold the common stock in carrying on business in Canada.  Special rules, which are not discussed in this summary, may apply to a United States holder that is an issuer that carries on business in Canada and elsewhere.



This summary is based upon the provisions of the Income Tax Act of Canada and the regulations thereunder (collectively, the "Tax Act" or
"ITA")and the Canada-United States Tax Convention (the "Tax Convention") as at the date of the Registration Statement and the current administrative practices of Canada Customs and Revenue Agency.  This summary does not take into account provincial income tax consequences.



Each holder should consult his own tax advisor with respect to the income tax consequences applicable to him in his own particular circumstances.



Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Consequences

The discussion under this heading summarizes the principal Canadian federal income tax consequences of acquiring, holding and disposing of shares of common stock of the Corporation for a shareholder of the Corporation who is not a resident of Canada but is a resident of the United States and who will acquire and hold shares of common stock of the Corporation as capital property for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the
"Canadian Tax Act"). This summary does not apply to a shareholder who carries on business in Canada through a
"permanent establishment" situated in Canada or performs independent personal services in Canada through a fixed base in Canada if the shareholder's holding in the Corporation is effectively connected with such permanent establishment or fixed base.  This summary is based on the provisions of the Canadian Tax Act and the regulations thereunder and on an understanding of the administrative practices of Canada Customs & Revenue Agency, and takes into account all specific proposals to amend the Canadian Tax Act or regulations made by the Minister of Finance of Canada as of the date hereof.  It has been assumed that there will be no other relevant amendment of any governing law although no assurance can be given in this respect. This discussion is general only and is not a substitute for independent advice from a shareholder's own Canadian and U.S. tax advisors.

The provisions of the Canadian Tax Act are subject to income tax treaties to which Canada is a party, including the Canada-United States Income Tax Convention (1980), as amended (the
"Convention").



Dividends on Common Shares and Other Income

Under the Canadian Tax Act, a non-resident of Canada is generally subject to Canadian withholding tax at the rate of 25 percent on dividends paid or deemed to have been paid to him or her by a corporation resident in Canada.  The Corporation is responsible for withholding of tax at the source.  The Convention limits the rate to 15 percent if the shareholder is a resident of the United States and the dividends are beneficially owned by and paid to such shareholder, and to 5 percent if the shareholder is also a corporation that beneficially owns at least 10 percent of the voting stock of the payor corporation.

The amount of a stock dividend (for tax purposes) would generally be equal to the amount by which the paid up or stated capital of the Corporation had increased by reason of the payment of such dividend.  The Corporation will furnish additional tax information to shareholders in the event of such a dividend.  Interest paid or deemed to be paid





84

---

on the Corporation's debt securities held by non-Canadian residents may also be subject to Canadian withholding tax, depending upon the terms and provisions of such securities and any applicable tax treaty.

The Convention generally exempts from Canadian income tax dividends paid to a religious, scientific, literary, educational or charitable organization or to an organization constituted and operated exclusively to administer a pension, retirement or employee benefit fund or plan, if the organization is a resident of the United States and is exempt from income tax under the laws of the United States.



Dispositions of Common Shares

Under the Canadian Tax Act, a taxpayer's capital gain or capital loss from a disposition of a share of common stock of the Corporation is the amount, if any, by which his or her proceeds of disposition exceed (or are exceeded by, respectively) the aggregate of his or her adjusted cost base of the share and reasonable expenses of disposition.  The capital gain or loss must be computed in Canadian currency using a weighted average adjusted cost base for identical properties.  The capital gains net of losses included in income are as follows.  For gains net of losses realized before February 28, 2000, as to 75%.  For gains net of losses realized after February 27, 2000 and before October 18, 2000, as to 66 2/3%.  For gains net of losses realized after October 17, 2000, as to 50%.  There are special transitional rules to apply capital losses against capital gains that arose in different periods.  The amount by which a shareholder's capital loss exceeds the capital gain in a year may be deducted from a capital gain realized by the shareholder in the three previous years or any subsequent year, subject to certain restrictions in the case of a corporate shareholder.



Under the Canadian Tax Act, a non-resident of Canada is subject to Canadian tax on taxable capital gains, and may deduct allowable capital losses, realized on a disposition of "taxable Canadian property."  Shares of common stock of the Corporation will constitute taxable Canadian property of a shareholder at a particular time if the shareholder used the shares in carrying on business in Canada, or if at any time in the five years immediately preceding the disposition 25% or more of the issued shares of any class or series in the capital stock of the Corporation belonged to one or more persons in a group comprising the shareholder and persons with whom the shareholder and persons with whom the shareholder did not deal at arm's length and in certain other circumstances.



The Convention relieves United States residents from liability for Canadian tax on capital gains derived on a disposition of shares unless



(a)  the value of the shares is derived principally from
"real property" in Canada, including the right to explore for or exploit natural resources and rights to amounts computed by reference to production,



(b) the shareholder was resident in Canada for 120 months during any period of 20 consecutive years preceding, and at any time during the 10 years immediately preceding, the disposition and the shares were owned by him when he or she ceased to be resident in Canada, or



(c)  the shares formed part of the business property of a
"permanent establishment" that the holder has or had in Canada within the 12 months preceding the disposition.



Certain United States Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following is a discussion of material United States federal income tax consequences generally applicable to a U.S. Holder (as defined below) of common shares of the Company. This discussion does not cover any state, local or foreign tax consequences.



The following discussion is based upon the sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("the Code"), Treasury Regulations, published Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") rulings, published administrative positions of the IRS and court decisions that are currently applicable, any or all of which could be materially and adversely changed, possible on a retroactive basis, at any time.  In addition, the discussion does not consider the potential effects, both adverse and beneficial, or recently proposed legislation which, if enacted, could be applied, possibly on a retroactive basis, at any time.  Holders and prospective holders of common shares of the Company are urged to consult their own tax advisors about the federal, state, local, and foreign tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of common shares of the Company.



85



---



U.S. Holders

As used herein, a U.S. Holder includes a holder of common shares of the Company who is a citizen or resident of the United States, a corporation (or an entity which has elected to be treated as a corporation under Treasury Regulation Sections 301.7701-3) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or of any political subdivision thereof, any estate other than a foreign estate (as defined in Section 7701(a)(31)(A) of the Code or, a trust subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and control of a United States fiduciary as described in Section 7701(a)(30)(E) of the Code. This summary does not address the tax consequences to, and U.S. Holder does not include, persons subject to special provisions of Federal income tax law, such as tax-exempt organizations, qualified retirement plans, financial institutions, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies, broker-dealers, non-resident alien individuals, persons or entities that have a
"functional currency" other than the U.S. dollar, shareholders who hold common shares as part of a straddle, hedging or conversion transaction, and shareholders who acquired their common shares through the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation for services. This summary is limited to U.S. Holders who own common shares as capital assets. This summary does not address the consequences to a person or entity holding an interest in a shareholder of the Company or the consequences to a person of the ownership, exercise or disposition of any options, warrants or other rights to acquire common shares of the Company.



Distribution on Common Shares of the Company

U.S. Holders receiving dividend distributions (including constructive dividends) with respect to common shares of the Company are required to include in gross income for United States federal income tax purposes the gross amount of such distributions equal to the U.S. dollar value of such distributions on the date of receipt (based on the exchange rate on such date), to the extent that the Company has current or accumulated earnings and profits, without reduction for any Canadian income tax withheld from such distributions.  Such Canadian tax withheld may be credited, subject to certain limitations, against the U.S. Holder's United States federal income tax liability or, alternatively, may be deducted in computing the U.S. Holder's United States federal taxable income.  (See more detailed discussion at
"Foreign Tax Credit" below).  To the extent that distributions exceed current or accumulated earnings and profits of the Company, they will be treated first as a return of capital up to the U.S. Holder's adjusted basis in the common shares and thereafter as gain from the sale or exchange of the common shares. Dividend income will be taxed at marginal tax rates applicable to ordinary income while preferential tax rates for long-term capital gains are applicable to a U.S. Holder which is an individual, estate or trust.  There are currently no preferential tax rates for long-term capital gains for a U.S. Holder which is a corporation.



In the case of foreign currency received as a dividend that is not converted by the recipient into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. Holder will have a tax basis in the foreign currency equal to its U.S. dollar value on the date of receipt.  Gain or loss may be recognized upon a subsequent sale of other disposition of the foreign currency, including the exchange for U.S. dollars.



Dividends paid on the common shares of the Company will not generally be eligible for the dividends received deduction provided to corporations receiving dividends from certain United States corporations.  A U.S. Holder which is a corporation may, under certain circumstances, be entitled to a 70% deduction of the United States source portion of dividends received from the Company (unless the Company qualifies as a
"foreign personal holding company" or a "passive foreign investment company", as defined below) if such U.S. Holder owns shares representing at least 10% of the voting power and value of the Company.  The availability of this deduction is subject to several complex limitations which are beyond the scope of this discussion.



Foreign Tax Credit

A U.S. Holder who pays (or has withheld from distributions) Canadian income tax with respect to the ownership of common shares of the Company may be entitled, at the option of the U.S. Holder, to either a deduction or a tax credit for such foreign tax paid or withheld.  Generally, it will be more advantageous to claim a credit because a credit reduces United States Federal income taxes on a dollar-for-dollar basis, while a deduction merely reduces the taxpayer's income subject to tax.  This election is made on a year-by-year basis and applies to all foreign income taxes (or taxes in lieu of income tax) paid by (or withheld from) the U.S. Holder during the year.  There are significant and complex limitations which apply to the credit, among which is the general limitation that the credit cannot exceed the proportionate share of the U.S. Holder's United States income tax liability that the U.S. Holder's foreign source income bears to his/her or its worldwide taxable income.  The various items of income and deduction must be classified into foreign and domestic sources. Complex rules govern this classification process.  In addition, this limitation is calculated separately with respect to specific classes of income such as
"passive income", "high withholding tax interest", "financial services income", "shipping income", and certain other classifications of



86



---

income. Dividends distributed by the Company will generally constitute
"passive income" or, in the case of certain U.S. Holders, "financial services income" for these purposes.  The availability of the foreign tax credit and the application of the limitations on the credit are fact specific and holders and prospective holders of common shares of the Company should consult their own tax advisors regarding their individual circumstances.



For individuals whose entire income from sources outside the United States consists of qualified passive income whose the total amount of creditable foreign taxes paid or accrued during the taxable year does not exceed $300 ($600 in the case of a joint return) and for whom an election is made under section 904(j), the limitation on credit does not apply.



Disposition of Common Shares of the Company

A U.S. Holder will recognize gain or loss upon the sale of common shares of the Company equal to the difference, if any, between (I) the amount of cash plus the fair market value of any property received, and (ii) the shareholder's tax basis in the common shares of the Company.  Preferential tax rates apply to long-term capital gains of U.S. Holders which are individuals, estates or trusts. This gain or loss will be capital gain or loss if the common shares are capital assets in the hands of the U.S. Holder, which will be a short-term or long-term capital gain or loss depending upon the holding period of the U.S. Holder.  Gains and losses are netted and combined according to special rules in arriving at the overall capital gain or loss for a particular tax year.  Deductions for net capital losses are subject to significant limitations.  For U.S. Holders which are not corporations, any unused portion of such net capital loss may be carried over to be used in later tax years until such net capital loss is thereby exhausted, but individuals may not carry back capital losses. For U.S. Holders which are corporations (other than corporations subject to Subchapter S of the Code), an unused net capital loss may be carried back three years from the loss year and carried forward five years from the loss year to be offset against capital gains until such net capital loss is thereby exhausted.



Other Considerations

In the following circumstances, the above sections of the discussion may not describe the United States federal income tax consequences resulting from the holding and disposition of common shares of the Company.



Foreign Personal Holding Company

If at any time during a taxable year more than 50% of the total combined voting power or the total value of the Company's outstanding shares is owned, actually or constructively, by five or fewer individuals who are citizens or residents of the United States and 60% (50% after the first tax year) or more of the Company's gross income for such year was derived from certain passive sources, the Company would be treated as a
"foreign personal holding company."  In that event, U.S. Holders that hold common shares of the Company would be required to include in gross income for such year their allocable portions of such passive income to the extent the Company does not actually distribute such income.



The Company does not believe that it currently has the status of a
"foreign personal holding company". However, there can be no assurance that the Company will not be considered a foreign personal holding company for any future taxable year.



Passive Foreign Investment Company

As a foreign corporation with U.S. Holders, the Company could potentially be treated as a passive foreign investment company ("PFIC"), as defined in Section 1297 of the Code, depending upon the percentage of the Company's income which is passive, or the percentage of the Company's assets which are held for the purpose of producing passive income.



Certain United States Income Tax Legislation

The rule governing PFICs can have significant tax effects on U.S. shareholders of foreign corporations.  These rules do not apply to non-U.S. shareholders.  Section 1297 of the Code defines a PFIC as a corporation that is not formed in the United States and, for any taxable year, either (i) 75% or more of its gross income is
"passive income", which includes interest, dividends and certain rents and royalties or (ii) the average percentage, by fair market value (or, if the company is a controlled foreign corporation or makes an election, by adjusted tax basis), of its assets that produce or are held for the production of
"passive income" is 50% or more.  The taxation of a US shareholder who owns stock in a PFIC is extremely complex and is therefore beyond the scope of this discussion.  U.S. shareholders should consult with their own tax advisors with regards to the impact of these rules.



Controlled Foreign Corporation

If more than 50% of the voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote is owned, actually or constructively, by



87



---

citizens or residents of the United States, United States partnerships, corporations or estates or trusts other than foreign estates or trusts, each of whom own actually or constructively 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company ("United States Shareholders") requires the Company would be a
"controlled foreign corporation" (CFC).  This classification would effect many complex results, one of which certain income of a CFC to be subject to current U.S. tax. The United States generally taxes United States Shareholders of a CFC currently on their pro rata shares of the Subpart F income of the CFC. Such United States Shareholders are generally treated as having received a current distribution out of the CFC's Subpart F income and are also subject to current U.S. tax on their pro rata shares of the CFC's earnings invested in U.S. property. The foreign tax credit described above may reduce the U.S. tax on these amounts. In addition, under Section 1248 of the Code, gain from the sale or exchange of shares by a U.S. Holder of common shares of the Corporation which is or was a United States Shareholder at any time during the five-year period ending with the sale or exchange is treated as ordinary income to the extent of earnings and profits of the Company (accumulated only while the shares were held by the United States Shareholder and while the Company was a CFC attributable to the shares sold or exchanged. If a foreign corporation is both a PFIC and a CFC, the foreign corporation generally will not be treated as a PFIC with respect to the United States Shareholders of the CFC. This rule generally will be effective for taxable years of United States Shareholders beginning after 1997 and for taxable years of foreign corporations ending with or within such taxable years of United States Shareholders. The PFIC provisions continue to apply in the case of a PFIC that is also a CFC with respect to the U.S. Holders that are less than 10% shareholders. Because of the complexity of Subpart F, a more detailed review of these rules is outside of the scope of this discussion.



Filing of Information Returns

Under a number of circumstances, United States persons acquiring shares of the Company may be required to file an information return with the Internal Revenue Service Center where they are required to file their tax returns with a duplicate copy to the Internal Revenue Service Center, Philadelphia, PA 19255. In particular, under Section 6046 of the Code, any United States person who becomes the owner, directly or indirectly, of 10% or more of the shares of the Company will be required to file such a return.  Other filing requirements may apply, such United States persons should consult their own tax advisors concerning these requirements.



Documents on Display

Any of the documents referred to above can be viewed at the registered office of the Company located at 1185 West Georgia Street, Suite 1150, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6E 4E6.



This Annual Report and the Company's recent 6-K filings can be viewed on the U.S. Securities and Exchange EDGAR web-site at www.sec.gov.  All regulatory filings in Canada can be viewed on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR) web-site at www.sedar.com.



Item 11.     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk



Not Applicable





Item 12.     Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities



Not Applicable



PART II





Item 13.     Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies



Not Applicable

Item 14.     Material Modifications to the Rights of Securities Holders and Use of Proceeds



Not Applicable



88



---



Item 15.      Controls and Procedures



The Company's chief executive officer, Duane Poliquin, and chief executive officer, Dione Bitzer, have evaluated and reviewed our disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of the filing date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F. Based upon this evaluation and review, the officers have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective and sufficient to comply with Rules 13a-15(c) and 15d-15(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



There have been no significant changes in the Company's internal controls that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the Company's most recent evaluation.



Item 16A.     Audit Committee Financial E
xpert

The Company's Board of Directors has determined that the Company has one audit committee financial expert serving on its audit committee who is independent. Mr. Donald Lorimer qualified as a Chartered Accountant with Price Waterhouse & Co. and subsequently was a financial executive with Patino Mining Corporation and Little Long Lac Gold Mines Ltd. In 1971 he joined A.E. Ames & Co. and became a director and vice president responsible for corporate and government underwriting in British Columbia, Canada. Mr. Lorimer is currently a portfolio manager with Odlum Brown Ltd.



Item 16B.     Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted several codes of conduct, including a Code of Business Ethics, a Code of Business Conduct Ethics for Directors, a Communications Policy and an Audit Committee Charter. All of these codes have been filed as Exhibits to this Annual Report.



Item 16C.     Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Table No. 1 6
 lists the aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of the Company's annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years.



Table No. 1 6

Principal Accountant Fees

Years ended December 3120032002Audit fees$3 6,000$ 30,000Audit related fees--Tax fees6,5006,500Other fees--




Fiscal 2003 and Fiscal 2002 audit fees relate to the annual audit of the Company's financial statements ,
 tax fees relate to the completion of income and mineral tax filings and review of the Form 20-F
..







Item 16D.     Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees



Not applicable.



Item 16E.     Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers



Not applicable.



89



---

PART III



Item 17.     Financial Statements



The Company's consolidated financials statements are stated in Canadian Dollars (CDN$) and are prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP, the application of which, in the case of the Company, conforms in all material respects for the periods presented with U.S. GAAP, except as disclosed in Note 17 to the financial statements.



The financial statements and notes thereto as required under Item 17 are attached hereto and found immediately following the text of this Annual Report.  The audit report of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent Chartered Accountants, is included herein immediately preceding the financial statements.



Item 18.    Financial Statements



The Company has elected to provide financial statements pursuant to Item 17.



Item 19.     Exhibits



A.  The financial statements and notes thereto as required under Item 17 are attached hereto and found immediately following the text of this Annual Report. The audit report of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent Chartered Accountants, for the audited financial statements and notes thereto is included herein immediately preceding the audited financial statements.



Audited Financial Statements

Auditors' Report, dated April 6, 2004.

Comments by Independent Auditors on Canada
- United States of America Reporting Differences, dated

April 6, 2004

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2003 and 2002

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Deficit for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 and

cumulative amounts since incorporation

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 and cumulative

amounts since incorporation

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



B.  Index to Exhibits

|    |                                                                                                           
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1.  | Certificate of Amalgamation                                                                               
|    | Amalgamation Agreement                                                                                    
|    | Memorandum                                                                                                
|    | Articles                                                                                                  
|    | --Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 20-F Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2001,
|    | as filed with the Commission on May 17, 2002--                                                            
|    |                                                                                                           
|2.  | Instruments defining the rights of holders of equity of debt securities being registered                  
|    | --Refer to Exhibit No. 1--                                                                                
|    |                                                                                                           
|3.  | Voting trust agreements
    - N/A                                                                         
|    |                                                                                                           
|4.1 | -
    Option Agreement dated April 10, 2003 with Ross River Minerals Inc.                                 
|4.2 | -
    English Summary of Option Agreement dated  May 28, 2003
 with Eduberto Garcia Ramirez               
|4.3 | -
    Joint Venture Agreement dated June 20, 2003 with Expatriate Resources Ltd.                          
|4.4 | -
    Letter Agreement dated August 21, 2003 with Kobex Resources Ltd.                                    
|4.5 | -
    Option Agreement dated February 11, 2004 with Grid Capital Corporation                              
|4.6 | -
    Option Agreement dated February 11, 2004 with Horseshoe Gold Mining Inc.                            
|4.7 | -
    Joint Venture Agreement dated February 11, 2004 with Horseshoe Gold Mining Inc.                     
|4.8 | -
    Option Agreement dated March 1, 2004 with Consolidated Spire Ventures Ltd.                          



90



---



|4.9  | -
      Option Agreement dated March 4, 2004 with Hawkeye Gold & Diamond Inc.                                                                            
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|     |                                                                                                                                                          
|5.   | List of foreign patents
    - N/A                                                                                                                        
|     |                                                                                                                                                          
|6.   | Calculation of earnings per share
    - N/A                                                                                                              
|     |                                                                                                                                                          
|7.   | Explanation of calculation of ratios
    - N/A                                                                                                           
|     |                                                                                                                                                          
|8.   | List of subsidiaries                                                                                                                                     
|     |                                                                                                                                                          
|9.   | Statement pursuant to the instruction to Item 8.A.4, regarding the financial statement filed in registration                                             
|     | Statements for initial public offerings of securities
    - N/A                                                                                          
|     |                                                                                                                                                          
|10.  | Any notice required by Rule 104 of Regulation BTR
    - N/A                                                                                              
|     |                                                                                                                                                          
|11.1 | Code of Business Ethics                                                                                                                                  
|11.2 | Code of Business Conduct Ethics for Directors                                                                                                            
|11.3 | Communications Policy                                                                                                                                    
|11.4 | Audit Committee Charter                                                                                                                                  
|11.5 | Corporate Governance Charter                                                                                                                             
|     |                                                                                                                                                          
|31.1 | Certification of CEO Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act, Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   
|31.2 | Certification of CFO Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act, Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   
|32.1 | Certification of CEO Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 18
    U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|32.2 | Certification of CFO Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 18
    U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



91





---





Auditors' Report and Consolidated Financial Statements





ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)





December 31, 2003 and 2002



92





---



Auditors' Report





To the Shareholders of

Almaden Minerals Ltd.





We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Almaden Minerals Ltd. (an exploration stage company) as at December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the consolidated statements of operations and deficit and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2003 and the cumulative amount from incorporation, September 25, 1980, to December 31, 2003.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.



We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America.  Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2003 and the cumulative amount from incorporation, September 25, 1980, to December 31, 2003 in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.



(Signed) Deloitte & Touche LLP



Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada

April 6, 2004





Comments by Independent Auditors on Canada - United States of America Reporting Differences





In the United States of America, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when there are changes in accounting principles that have a material effect on the comparability of the Company's financial statements, such as the change described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements.  Our report to the shareholders dated April 6, 2004 is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards which do not require a reference to such changes in accounting principles in the auditors' report when the changes are properly accounted for and adequately disclosed in the financial statements.



(Signed) Deloitte & Touche LLP



Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada

April 6, 2004

93



---





ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Consolidated Balance Sheets

December 31,

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)



|                                                 |                                          |              |                            |                 |                   |           |                  |  |  |          | 2003 |  | 2002
|------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------- | ------------ | -------------------------- | --------------- | ----------------- | --------- | ---------------- |  |  | -------- | ---- |  | ----
|ASSETS                                           |                                          |              |                            |                 |                   |           |                  |  |  | (Note 3)
|                                                 |                                          |              |                            |                 |                   |           |                  |  |  |          |      |  |     
|CURRENT                                          |                                          |              |                            |                 |                   |           |                  |  | 
|                                                 | Cash and cash equivalents                |              |                            |                 | $   4,838,914     |           | $        964,967
|                                                 | Accounts receivable and prepaid expenses |              | 105,106                    |                 | 136,085          
|                                                 | Marketable securities (Note 4)           |              |                            |                 | 369,286           |           | 600,074         
|                                                 | Inventory (Note 5)                       |              |                            |                 | 274,768           |           | 274,768         
|TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS                             |                                          |              |                            | 5,588,074       |                   | 1,975,894
|PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (Note 6)           |                                          | 474,521      |                            | 240,494        
|RECLAMATION DEPOSIT                              |                                          |              |                            | 81,500          |                   | 81,500   
|MINERAL PROPERTIES (Note 7)                      |                                          |              | 4,197,675                  |                 | 3,337,864        
|TOTAL ASSETS                                     |                                          |              |                            |                 | $ 10,341,770      |           | $     5,635,752 
|                                                 |                                          |              |                            |                 |                   |           |                  |  |  |          |      |  |     
|LIABILITIES                                      |                                          |              |                            |                 |                   |           |                 
|                                                 |                                          |              |                            |                 |                   |           |                  |  |  |          |      |  |     
|CURRENT                                          |                                          |              |                            |                 |                   |           |                  |  | 
|                                                 | Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |              | $        49,625            |                 | $          61,814
|                                                 | Deferred exploration advances (Note 8)   |              | 58,011                     |                 | -                
|                                                 | Mineral taxes payable (Note 16)          |              |                            |                 | 379,653           |           | 392,453         
|TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES                        |                                          |              | 487,289                    |                 | 454,267          
|                                                 |                                          |              |                            |                 |                   |           |                  |  |  |          |      |  |     
|CONTINGENCY (Note 16)                            |                                          |              |                            |                 |                   |          
|                                                 |                                          |              |                            |                 |                   |           |                  |  |  |          |      |  |     
|SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY                             |                                          |              |                            |                 |                   |          
|                                                 |                                          |              |                            |                 |                   |           |                  |  |  |          |      |  |     
|Share capital                                    |                                          |              |                            |                 |                   |           |                  | 
|                                                 | Authorized                               |              |                            |                 |                   |           |                  |  | 
|100,000,000                                      | common shares without par value          |              |                            |                 |                  
|                                                 | Issued (Note 9)                          |              |                            |                 |                   |           |                 
|27,627,079                                       | shares - December 31, 2003               |              |                            |                 |                  
|21,918,722                                       | shares - December 31, 2002               |              | 21,476,722                 |                 | 17,389,381       
|Subscription for shares (Note 9)                 |                                          |              |                            | 1,699,435       |                   | -        
|Contributed surplus (Notes 2 (j) and 3)          |                                          | 374,525      |                            | 162,000        
|Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage |                                          | (13,696,201) |                            | (12,369,896)   
|TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY                       |                                          | 9,854,481    |                            | 5,181,485      
|TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY       |                                          | $ 10,341,770 |                            | $     5,635,752
|                                                 |                                          |              |                            |                 |                   |           |                  |  |  |          |      |  |     
|ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD:                          |                                          |              |                            |                 |                   |          
|                                                 |                                          |              |                            |                 |                   |           |                  |  |  |          |      |  |     
|(Signed) Duane Poliquin                          |                                          |              | (Signed) James E. McInnes 
|Duane Poliquin, Director                         |                                          |              | James E. McInnes, Director

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

94



---





ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Deficit

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)



|                                   |                                           |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |           |                  |         | Cumulative
      amount since
      incorporation
      September 25,
      1980 to
      December 31,
      2003 |                          |             |      |             |      |          
|---------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------- | --------------------- | ------------- | --------- | ------------- | -------- | ------------------ | --------- | ---------------- | ------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | ----------- | ---- | ----------- | ---- | ---------
|                                   |                                           |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |           |                  |         |                                                                                                                   |                          |             |      |             |     
|                                   |                                           |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |           |                  |         |                                                                                                                   |                          |             |      |             |     
|                                   |                                           |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |           |                  |         |                                                                                                                   |                          |             |      |             |     
|                                   |                                           |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |           |                  |         |                                                                                                                   |                          |             |      |             |     
|                                   |                                           |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |           |                  |         |                                                                                                                   | Years ended December 31,
|                                   |                                           |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |           |                  |         |                                                                                                                   | 2003                     |             | 2002 |             | 2001
|                                   |                                           |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |           |                  |         |                                                                                                                   |                          |             |      | (Note 3)    |      |          
|                                   |                                           |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |           |                  |         |                                                                                                                   |                          |             |      |             |      |          
|REVENUE                            |                                           |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |           |                  |         |                                                                                                                   |                          |            
|                                   | Mineral properties                        |                       |               |           | $     710,353 |          | $       26,335     |           | $       20,815   |         | $              -                                                                                                 
|                                   | Interest income                           |                       |               |           |               | 790,932  |                    | 34,267    |                  | 40,251  |                                                                                                                   | 30,538                  
|                                   | Other income                              |                       |               |           |               | 130,191  |                    | 49,628    |                  | 61,472  |                                                                                                                   | -                       
|                                   |                                           |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |           |                  |         | 1,631,476                                                                                                         |                          | 110,230     |      | 122,538     |      | 30,538   
|                                   |                                           |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |           |                  |         |                                                                                                                   |                          |             |      |             |      |          
|EXPENSES                           |                                           |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |           |                  |         |                                                                                                                   |                          |            
|                                   | General and administrative                |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |           |                 
|                                   |                                           | expenses (Schedule 1) |               | 4,444,606 |               | 605,763  |                    | 598,753   |                  | 327,082
|                                   | General exploration expenses              |                       | 2,289,463     |           | 439,503       |          | 332,485            |           | 110,136         
|                                   | Write-down of interests in                |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |           |                 
|                                   |                                           | mineral properties    |               |           | 6,514,542     |          | 105,666            |           | 2,180,738        |         | 83,295                                                                                                           
|                                   | Stock option compensation   
    (Note 3) |                       | 382,000       |           | 220,000       |          | 162,000            |           | -               
|                                   |                                           |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |           |                  |         | 13,630,611                                                                                                        |                          | 1,370,932   |      | 3,273,976   |      | 520,513  
|                                   |                                           |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |           |                  |         | (11,999,135)                                                                                                      |                          | (1,260,702) |      | (3,151,438) |      | (489,975)
|GAIN (LOSS) ON SECURITIES          |                                           | (1,693,003)           |               | 13,980    |               | (54,980) |                    | (164,055)
|GAIN ON SALE OF PROPERTY, PLANT    |                                           |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |          
|                                   | AND EQUIPMENT                             |                       |               | 14,210    |               | -        |                    | 15,144    |                  | -      
|FOREIGN EXCHANGE GAIN (LOSS)       |                                           | (18,273)              |               | (79,583)  |               | (6,751)  |                    | 3,935    
|NET LOSS                           |                                           |                       |               |           |               |          | (13,696,201)       |           | (1,326,305)      |         | (3,198,025)                                                                                                       |                          | (650,095)  
|DEFICIT, ACCUMULATED               |                                           |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |          
|                                   | DURING EXPLORATION                        |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |           |                 
|                                   | STAGE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD                |                       | -             |           | (12,369,896)  |          | (9,171,871)        |           | (8,521,776)     
|DEFICIT, ACCUMULATED               |                                           |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |          
|                                   | DURING EXPLORATION                        |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |           |                 
|                                   | STAGE, END OF PERIOD                      |                       | $(13,696,201) |           | $(13,696,201) |          | $(12,369,896)      |           | $ (9,171,871)   
|                                   |                                           |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |           |                  |         |                                                                                                                   |                          |             |      |             |      |          
|NET LOSS PER SHARE                 |                                           |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |          
|                                   | Basic and diluted                         |                       |               |           |               |          | $           (0.06) |           | $         (0.16) |         | $         (0.05)                                                                                                 
|                                   |                                           |                       |               |           |               |          |                    |           |                  |         |                                                                                                                   |                          |             |      |             |      |          
|BASIC AND DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE |                                           |                       |               |           |               |         
|                                   | NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING              |                       | 23,378,693    |           | 19,524,034    |          | 13,411,621        



See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

95



---





ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)



|                                              |                                                |                                               |               |             |              | Cumulative
      amount since
      incorporation
      September 25,
      1980 to
      December 31,
      2003 |                          |           |               |           |      |          
|--------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------- | ------------- | ----------- | ------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | --------- | ------------- | --------- | ---- | ---------
|                                              |                                                |                                               |               |             |              |                                                                                                                   |                          |           |               |           |     
|                                              |                                                |                                               |               |             |              |                                                                                                                   |                          |           |               |           |     
|                                              |                                                |                                               |               |             |              |                                                                                                                   |                          |           |               |           |     
|                                              |                                                |                                               |               |             |              |                                                                                                                   |                          |           |               |           |     
|                                              |                                                |                                               |               |             |              |                                                                                                                   | Years ended December 31,
|                                              |                                                |                                               |               |             |              |                                                                                                                   | 2003                     |           | 2002          |           | 2001
|                                              |                                                |                                               |               |             |              |                                                                                                                   |                          |           |               | (Note 3)  |      |          
|                                              |                                                |                                               |               |             |              |                                                                                                                   |                          |           |               |           |      |          
|OPERATING ACTIVITIES                          |                                                |                                               |               |             |              |                                                                                                                   |                          |          
|                                              | Net loss                                       |                                               | $(13,696,201) |             | $(1,326,305) |                                                                                                                   | $ (3,198,025)            |           | $   (650,095)
|                                              | Items not affecting cash                       |                                               |               |             |              |                                                                                                                   |                          |           |              
|                                              |                                                | Depreciation                                  |               | 348,269     |              | 38,852                                                                                                            |                          | 43,166    |               | 26,882   
|                                              |                                                | Loss (gain) on marketable securities          |               | 1,693,003   |              | (13,980)                                                                                                          |                          | 54,980    |               | 164,055  
|                                              |                                                | Write-down of interests in mineral properties |               | 6,514,542   |              | 105,666                                                                                                           |                          | 2,180,738 |               | 83,295   
|                                              |                                                | Stock-based compensation                      |               | 382,000     |              | 220,000                                                                                                           |                          | 162,000   |               | -        
|                                              |                                                | Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment |               | (14,210)    |              | -                                                                                                                 |                          | (15,144)  |               | -        
|                                              |                                                | Write-off of incorporation costs              |               | 3,298       |              | -                                                                                                                 |                          | -         |               | -        
|                                              | Changes in non-cash working capital components |                                               |               |             |              |                                                                                                                   |                          |           |              
|                                              |                                                | Accounts receivable and prepaid expenses      |               | (110,582)   |              | 30,979                                                                                                            |                          | (29,281)  |               | 61,393   
|                                              |                                                | Accounts payable and accrued liabilities      |               | 14,523      |              | (12,189)                                                                                                          |                          | (66,052)  |               | 17,709   
|                                              |                                                | Mineral taxes payable                         |               | (669)       |              | (12,800)                                                                                                          |                          | 12,131    |               | -        
|                                              |                                                | Deferred exploration advances                 |               | 58,011      |              | 58,011                                                                                                            |                          | -         |               | -        
|                                              |                                                |                                               |               |             |              | (4,808,016)                                                                                                       |                          | (911,766) |               | (855,487) |      | (296,761)
|                                              |                                                |                                               |               |             |              |                                                                                                                   |                          |           |               |           |      |          
|FINANCING ACTIVITY                            |                                                |                                               |               |             |              |                                                                                                                   |                          |          
|                                              | Issuance of shares - net of expenses           |                                               | 20,623,870    |             | 5,779,301    |                                                                                                                   | 2,378,605                |           | -            
|                                              |                                                |                                               |               |             |              |                                                                                                                   |                          |           |               |           |      |          
|INVESTING ACTIVITIES                          |                                                |                                               |               |             |              |                                                                                                                   |                          |          
|                                              | Cash acquired upon business combination        |                                               | 198,131       |             | -            |                                                                                                                   | -                        |           | 198,131      
|                                              | Long-term investment                           |                                               | (1,891,315)   |             | -            |                                                                                                                   | -                        |           | -            
|                                              | Reclamation deposit                            |                                               | (5,000)       |             | -            |                                                                                                                   | (5,000)                  |           | -            
|                                              | Marketable securities                          |                                               |               |             |              |                                                                                                                   |                          |           |              
|                                              |                                                | Purchases                                     |               | (4,275,187) |              | (352,526)                                                                                                         |                          | (575,226) |               | -        
|                                              |                                                | Net proceeds                                  |               | 3,950,415   |              | 597,294                                                                                                           |                          | 410,860   |               | 319,719  
|                                              | Property, plant and equipment                  |                                               |               |             |              |                                                                                                                   |                          |           |              
|                                              |                                                | Purchases                                     |               | (823,367)   |              | (247,879)                                                                                                         |                          | (200,443) |               | (44,309) 
|                                              |                                                | Proceeds                                      |               | 62,287      |              | -                                                                                                                 |                          | 48,587    |               | -        
|                                              | Mineral properties                             |                                               |               |             |              |                                                                                                                   |                          |           |              
|                                              |                                                | Costs                                         |               | (9,561,511) |              | (990,477)                                                                                                         |                          | (873,935) |               | (190,279)
|                                              |                                                | Gold sales                                    |               | 362,906     |              | -                                                                                                                 |                          | 362,906   |               | -        
|                                              |                                                | Net proceeds                                  |               | 1,008,999   |              | -                                                                                                                 |                          | -         |               | -        
|                                              | Incorporation costs                            |                                               | (3,298)       |             | -            |                                                                                                                   | -                        |           | -            
|                                              |                                                |                                               |               |             |              | (10,976,940)                                                                                                      |                          | (993,588) |               | (832,251) |      | 283,262  
|NET CASH INFLOW (OUTFLOW)                     |                                                | 4,838,914                                     |               | 3,873,947   |              | 690,867                                                                                                           |                          | (13,499) 
|CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,                    |                                                |                                               |               |             |              |                                                                                                                   |                          |          
|                                              | BEGINNING OF PERIOD                            |                                               | -             |             | 964,967      |                                                                                                                   | 274,100                  |           | 287,599      
|CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,                    |                                                |                                               |               |             |              |                                                                                                                   |                          |          
|                                              | END OF PERIOD                                  |                                               | $  4,838,914  |             | $ 4,838,914  |                                                                                                                   | $     964,967            |           | $     274,100
|                                              |                                                |                                               |               |             |              |                                                                                                                   |                          |           |               |           |      |          
|SUPPLEMENTARY CASH FLOW INFORMATION (Note 11) |                                                |                                               |               |             |              |                                                                                                                  



See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

96



---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





1.

NATURE OF OPERATIONS



Almaden Minerals Ltd. (the
"Company") is in the process of exploring its mineral properties and has not yet determined whether these properties contain reserves that are economically recoverable.  The recoverability of amounts shown for mineral properties is dependent upon the establishment of a sufficient quantity of economic recoverable reserves, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary financing to complete the development and upon future profitable production or proceeds from the disposition of mineral properties.





2.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES



These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles, which in respect of these financial statements are different in some respects from generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America as discussed in Note 17 and include the following policies:



(a)

Basis of consolidation



The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries as follows:







Almaden America Inc.

Nevada

Republic Resources Ltd.

British Columbia

Almaden de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.

Mexico

Minera Gavilan, S.A. de C.V.

Mexico

Compania Minera Zapata, S.A. de C.V.

Mexico



(b)

Foreign exchange



The functional currency of the Company's subsidiaries has been determined to be the Canadian dollar.  U.S. dollar and Mexican peso denominated amounts in these financial statements are translated into Canadian dollars on the following basis:



(i)

Monetary assets and liabilities - at the rate of exchange prevailing at the year-end.



(ii)

Non-monetary assets - at the rates of exchange prevailing when the assets were acquired or the liabilities assumed.



(iii)

Income and expenses - at the rate approximating the rates of exchange prevailing on the dates of the transactions.



(iv)

Gains and losses on translation are credited or charged to operations.





97



---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





2.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)



(c)

Cash and cash equivalents



Cash equivalents include money market instruments which are readily convertible into cash or have maturities at the date of purchase of less than ninety days.



(d)

Marketable securities



Investment in marketable securities is recorded at the lower of cost and quoted market value.



(e)

Inventory



Inventory is valued at the lower of the average cost of mining and estimated net realizable value.



(f)

Property, plant and equipment



Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated annually on a declining-balance basis at the following rates:



Automotive equipment

30%

Computer hardware and software

30%

Field equipment

20%

Furniture and fixtures

20%

Geological data library

20%

Mill equipment

10%



On a quarterly basis the Company compares the carrying value of property, plant and equipment to estimated net recoverable amounts, based on estimated future cash flows, to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. An impairment in value would be indicated if the assets' carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amount.  During the periods covered by these financial statements there was no indication of impairment.





98

---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





2.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)



(g)

Mineral properties



The Company is in the exploration stage with respect to its investment in mineral claims and accordingly follows the practice of capitalizing all costs relating to the acquisition of, exploration for and development of mineral claims and crediting all revenues received against the cost of the related claims.  At such time as commercial production commences, these costs will be charged to operations on a unit-of-production method based on proven and probable reserves.  The aggregate costs related to abandoned mineral claims are charged to operations at the time of any abandonment or when it has been determined that there is evidence of a permanent impairment.



The recoverability of amounts shown for mineral properties is dependent upon the discovery of economically recoverable reserves, the ability of the Company to obtain financing to complete development of the properties and on future production or proceeds of disposition.



(h)

Income taxes



Future income tax liabilities and future income tax assets are recorded based on differences between the financial reporting basis of the Company's assets and liabilities and their corresponding tax basis.  The future benefits of income tax assets, including unused tax losses are recognized, subject to a valuation allowance, to the extent that it is more likely than not that such losses will be ultimately utilized.  These future income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to apply when the tax liabilities or assets are to be either settled or realized.



(i)

Revenue recognition



Recovery of costs incurred and determined in accordance with agreements related to a mineral property acquisition, exploration and development in excess of costs incurred are reflected as revenue when receivable and collection is probable.



(j)

Stock-based compensation plans



The Company accounts for options granted under its fixed stock option plan (Notes 3 and 9) using the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation.  Accordingly, the fair value of the options at the date of grant is accrued and charged to operations, with an offsetting credit to contributed surplus, on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.  If and when the stock options are ultimately exercised, the applicable amounts of contributed surplus are transferred to share capital.





99

---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





2.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)



(k)

Loss per share



The loss per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares of the Company that were outstanding each year.



(l)

Use of estimates



The preparation of financial statements in conformity with the Canadian generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.  Significant estimates used in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements include, amongst other things, depreciation, determination of net recoverable value of assets, determination of fair value on taxes and contingencies.





3.

ACCOUNTING CHANGES



Effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted the recommendations of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (the
"CICA") for stock-based compensation and other stock-based payments.  These recommendations established standards for the recognition, measurement and disclosure of stock-based compensation and other stock-based payments in exchange for goods and services.  In 2001 and prior years, no stock-based compensation expense was recognized when share options were granted to employees and directors.  In 2002, the Company elected not to account for stock-based compensation, however, it disclosed the pro forma effect of the stock-based compensation on its financial results.  Further to changes in the CICA section for stock-based compensation in 2003, the Company has adopted the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation, as described in Note 2 (j).  This change has been applied retroactively and the financial statements for 2002 have been restated.  The effect of this change was to increase the net loss for the year ended December 31, 2002 by $162,000 for a net loss of $3,198,025 (no change to loss per share).  The contributed surplus balance at December 31, 2002 increased to $162,000 and the deficit at January 1, 2003 increased to $12,369,896.







100

---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





4.

MARKETABLE SECURITIES

20032002Money market investments$        163,049$       568,339Equity securities206,23731,735$        369,286$       600,074




The market value of the investments as at December 31, 2003 was $1,268,497 (2002 - $780,834).





5.

INVENTORY



Inventory consists of gold bullion which is valued at the lower of average cost of mining and estimated net realizable value.  The market value of the gold at December 31, 2003 is $859,681.





6.

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT



20032002AccumulatedNet BookNet BookCostDepreciationValueValueAutomotive equipment$    135,247$       91,026$      44,221$      32,816Furniture and fixtures105,27686,08319,19319,436Computer hardware136,677107,99028,68713,877Computer software15,4919,3946,0972,707Geological data library15,10610,9674,1393,303Field equipment128,90379,98348,92049,855Mill equipment323,264-323,264118,500$    859,964$     385,443$    474,521$    240,494




At December 31, 2003 the mill equipment was not available for use.  Depreciation will be charged once the equipment is put into use.







101

---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





7.

MINERAL PROPERTIES

20032002CanadaElk100% interest in mineral claims in British Columbiawhich includes the Siwash gold deposit$  1,644,696$  1,089,462ATWNet 30% interest in mineral claims near Lac De Gras,Northwest Territories171,461117,803PV100% interest in mineral claims in British Columbia124,42188,962MOR100% interest in minerals claims in the Yukon Territory62,02462,024Rock River Coal50% interest in 187,698 acre coal prospect in the YukonTerritory43,70714,097Cabin Lake100% interest in minerals claims in the Yukon Territory35,00035,000Caribou Creek100% interest in minerals claims in the Yukon Territory35,00035,000MexicoCaballo Blanco (Note 7 (a))Option to purchase 100% interest in mineral claims inVeracruz522,756519,161El Pulpo (Note 7 (b))100% interest in mineral claims in Sinaloa State95,20368,188San Carlos / San Jose (Note 7 (c))100% interest in the San Carlos and San Jose mineral claimsin Tamaulipas State244,590276,551Galeana (Note 7 (d))Option to purchase 100% interest in mineral claims inChihuahua State118,27281,944Yago / La Sarda (Note 7 (e))100% interest in mineral claim in Nayarit State799,505777,180Fuego100% interest in mineral claims in Oaxaca State30,372-Interests in various other mineral claims (Note 7 (g))270,668172,492$  4,197,675$  3,337,864






102

---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





7.

MINERAL PROPERTIES (Continued)



The following is a description of the Company's most significant property interests and related spending commitments.



(a)

Caballo Blanco



In terms of the original agreement, to earn a 60% interest in the property, the Company had to issue a total of 200,000 shares and pay U.S.$500,000 plus value added tax over four and a half years.  To earn the remaining 40% interest, the Company had to pay an additional U.S.$500,000 plus value added tax within a year of earning its 60% interest, plus a 2.5% net smelter return ("NSR").  The Company could have reduced this NSR to 1.5% for a fixed payment of U.S.$2,000,000 plus value added tax payable equally over 10 years.



The agreement was amended in January 2003.  To earn a 100% interest, the Company must issue a total of 200,000 common shares and must pay U.S.$668,500 plus value added tax by February 26, 2007.  The underlying owner would also receive a NSR of 2.5% to 1% based on the rate of production.  The Company can purchase 50% of this NSR for a fixed payment of U.S.$750,000 plus value added tax.  As at December 31, 2003, the Company had issued the required 200,000 common shares and paid U.S.$301,000 of this obligation.



During 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with Comaplex Minerals Corp. ("Comaplex").  To earn a 60% interest, Comaplex must keep the property in good standing and incur exploration expenditures totalling U.S.$2,000,000 by January 16, 2007.



(b)

El Pulpo



The Company acquired a 100% interest in the Gavilan claims by staking.  Two additional claims, which are surrounded by the Gavilan claims, are held under option.  To earn a 100% interest, the Company must pay U.S.$162,000 plus value added tax by February 2005.  The claims are subject to a 1% NSR which can be purchased for a fixed payment of U.S.$500,000 plus value added tax.  As at December 31, 2003, U.S.$21,000 of the obligation had been satisfied.



During 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with Ross River Minerals Ltd. ("Ross River").  To earn an initial 50.1% interest, Ross River must maintain the property in good standing, incur exploration expenditures totalling U.S.$2,000,000 and issue 425,000 common shares to the Company by April 30, 2008.  Ross River can increase its interest to 60% by incurring a further U.S.$1,000,000 of exploration expenditures by April 30, 2010.

103



---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





7.

MINERAL PROPERTIES (Continued)



(c)

San Carlos



The Company acquired a 100% interest in the San Carlos claims by staking and purchased a 100% interest in the San Jose claim, subject to a 2% NSR.  The Begonia claims, which are surrounded by the San Carlos claims, are held under option.  To earn its interest, the Company must pay U.S.$1,000,000 plus value added tax by 2007.  The claims are subject to a sliding scale NSR from 2.5% to 1.0% based on the rate of production.  At December 31, 2003, U.S.$90,000 of this obligation had been paid.



During 2001, the Company entered into an agreement with Aurcana Corporation ("Aurcana") which was terminated during 2003.



(d)

Galeana



The Galeana claims are held under option.  To earn a 100% interest, the Company must pay U.S.$100,000 plus value added tax over seven years.  The Company must also pay U.S.$400,000 plus value added tax should the property go into production.  The claims are subject to a NSR of 3% to 1% based on the rate of production.  The Company can purchase 50% of this NSR for a fixed payment of U.S.$500,000 plus value added tax at any time.  As at December 31, 2003, U.S.$10,000 of this obligation had been satisfied.



During 2002, the Company entered into an agreement with Grid Capital Corporation ("Grid").  To earn an initial 50% interest, Grid must maintain the property in good standing, incur exploration expenditures totalling U.S.$1,000,000 and issue 400,000 shares to the Company by July 31, 2006.  Grid can increase its interest to 60% by incurring an additional U.S.$1,000,000 of exploration expenditures and issuing a further 100,000 shares to the Company by July 31, 2007.



(e)

Yago / La Sarda



The Company acquired a 100% interest in the Tepic claim by staking and purchased a 100% interest in the La Sarda claims.  The adjoining Guadalupe and Sagitario claims are held under option.  To earn a 100% interest in the Guadalupe claim, the Company must pay U.S.$30,000 plus value added tax over six years.  To earn a 100% interest in the Sagitario claim the Company must pay U.S.$250,000 plus value added tax by January 1, 2005.  As at December 31, 2003, U.S.$120,000 of this obligation had been satisfied.



During 2002 the Company entered into an agreement with Ascot Resources Ltd. which was terminated during 2003.



104



---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





7.

MINERAL PROPERTIES (Continued)



(f)

BHP Billiton Joint Venture



On May 9, 2002, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with BHP Billiton World Exploration Inc. ("BHP") to undertake exploration in eastern Mexico.  Each company committed to fund U.S.$200,000 of exploration in the first year.  To earn a 51% interest in any property which may be acquired, BHP must fund an initial U.S.$1,000,000 of exploration, after which both companies are committed to fund a further U.S.$750,000 of exploration.  If either company fails to make its contribution, it would be diluted to a 2% net smelter return royalty.  If both companies maintain their interest of funding, BHP can earn a further 19% interest in each project by completing a feasibility study.  A final 10% interest can be earned by BHP by funding the property into production.  At December 31, 2003, each company had incurred U.S.$154,555 of exploration expenditures.



(g)

Other



(i)

Tropico



The Company acquired a 100% interest in the property.  During 2001, Santoy Resources Ltd. ("Santoy") completed its obligations and earned a 60% interest in the property.  The property is subject to a 2.25% NSR.



During 2001, the Company and Santoy entered into an agreement with Sumitomo Metal Mining Ltd. which was terminated during 2003.



(ii)

Goz Creek



The Company has a 100% interest in the Goz Creek property, Yukon Territory, which is subject to a 5% net profits interest.





8.

DEFERRED EXPLORATION ADVANCES



At December 31, 2003, the Company has deferred $58,011 received from BHP Billiton World Exploration Inc. in advance of exploration.  These funds will be used for further exploration in eastern Mexico.







105

---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





9.

SHARE CAPITAL



The changes in issued shares for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003 are as follows:

NumberPriceAmountBalance, December 31, 200013,280,617$             -$  13,226,964For mineral properties25,0002.9072,500Issuance to acquire Fairfield Minerals Ltd.6,877,6810.251,711,312Adjustment to issued shares on amalgamation(3,060,292)--Balance, December 31, 200117,123,00615,010,776For cash pursuant to private placements4,150,0000.43-0.551,897,943For cash on exercise of share purchase warrants134,7500.3851,312For purchase of mill122,0770.6579,350For mineral properties388,8890.90350,000Balance, December 31, 200221,918,72217,389,381For cash pursuant to private placements2,773,8000.70-2.152,362,704For cash on exercise of share purchase warrants2,771,8070.42-0.951,648,664For cash on exercise of stock options162,7500.30-0.5575,973Balance, December 31, 200327,627,079$  21,476,722




(i)

The Company issued 80,000 units on March 13, 2003 on a private placement basis at a price of $0.80 per share, after incurring issue costs of $1,220.  Each unit consists of one flow-through common share and one-half common share purchase warrant.  Each whole warrant is exercisable into one non-flow-through common share at $0.95 per share until March 13, 2004.



(ii)

The Company issued 323,500 units on August 7, 2003 on a private placement basis at a price of $0.80 per unit, after incurring issue costs of $14,141.  Each unit consists of one flow-through common share and one-half common share purchase warrant.  Each whole warrant is exercisable into one non-flow-through common share at $0.80 per share until July 7, 2005.  Also, 3,765 units were issued to an agent in consideration of its services.





106

---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





9.

SHARE CAPITAL (Continued)



(iii)

The Company issued 1,700,000 units on September 18, 2003 on a private placement basis at a price of $0.70 per unit, after incurring issue costs of $112,776.  Each unit consists of one common share and one common share purchase warrant.  Each warrant is exercisable into one common share at $1.25 per share until September 18, 2004, at $1.50 per share until September 18, 2005, at $1.75 per share until September 18, 2006, at $2.00 per share until September 18, 2007 and at $2.25 per share until September 18, 2008.  In the event that, at any time after September 18, 2004, the weighted average trading price of the Company's common shares for any 20 consecutive trading days is $0.50 or more above the then current exercise price (the twentieth such trading day being the
"Determination"), the Company agrees to immediately notify the Holder (the "Notice of Expiry") of the accelerated expiry date, which is a date not less than the thirtieth calendar day following the date of the Notice of Expiry (the
"Accelerated Expiry Date"). All warrants not exercised by the expiration of the Accelerated Expiry Date shall be deemed cancelled without further notice to the Holders.  Also, 119,000 units were issued to an agent in consideration of its services.



(iv)

The Company issued 55,000 units and 70,000 flow-through common shares on October 28, 2003 on a private placement basis at a price of $1.50 per unit and per share, after incurring issue costs of $4,881.  Each unit consists of one flow-through common share and one-half common share purchase warrant.  Each whole warrant is exercisable into one non-flow through common share at $1.60 per share until October 28, 2004.  Also, 825 units were issued to an agent in consideration of its services.



(v)

The Company issued 280,000 units on December 30, 2003 on a private placement basis at a price of $1.50 per share, after incurring issue costs of $6,300.  Each unit consists of one common share and one-half common share purchase warrant.  Each whole warrant is exercisable into one common share at $1.85 per share until December 30, 2005.



(vi)

The Company issued 5,000 flow-through common shares and 135,000 units on December 30, 2003 on a private placement basis at a price of $2.15 per share and per unit, after incurring issue costs of $10,504.  Each unit consists of one flow-through common share and one-half common share purchase warrants.  Each whole warrant is exercisable into one non-flow-through common share at $2.25 until December 30, 2005.  Also, 1,710 units were issued to an agent in consideration of its services.



On January 12, 2004, the Company completed a private placement of 1,300,000 common shares at a price of $1.32 per share, after incurring share issue costs of $16,565.  These funds were received by the Company prior to December 31, 2003 and have been recorded as a subscription for shares.





107



---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





9.

SHARE CAPITAL (Continued)



Warrants

Number ofExerciseWarrantsExpiry DatePrice RangeOutstanding, January 1, 20012,353,000January 9, 2001 to
    October 1, 2004$0.26 to $5.02Adjustment on amalgamation(405,490)-3.95 - 6.52Expired(590,000)-0.55-3.20Outstanding,January 9, 2002 toDecember 31, 20011,357,510October 1, 20040.38 to 6.52Granted2,925,000-0.51 to 0.70Exercised(134,750)-0.38Expired(310,310)-3.95 to 6.52Outstanding,April 2, 2003 toDecember 31, 20023,837,450October 15, 20040.42 to 0.70Granted2,258,901-0.95 to 2.25Exercised(2,771,807)-0.42 to 0.95Outstanding,March 13, 2004 toDecember 31, 20033,324,544September 18, 2008$0.47 to $2.25




At December 31, 2003, the following share purchase warrants were outstanding:



Number ofExerciseWarrantsExpiry DatePrice Range20,000March 13, 2004$              0.95622,500April 2, 20040.601,819,000September 18, 2004/2005/1.25/1.50/2006/2007/20081.75/2.00/2.25450,450October 1, 20040.4750,000October 15, 20040.7027,914October 28, 20041.60126,325August 7, 20050.80140,000December 30, 20051.8568,355December 30, 20052.253,324,544










108

---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





9.

SHARE CAPITAL (Continued)



At December 31, 2003, 77,000 of the warrants outstanding are held by directors (2002 - 959,700).



Options



The Company has a fixed stock option plan which permits the issuance of options up to 10% of the Company's issued share capital.  During 2002, the maximum number of shares reserved for issuance under this plan was increased from 1,000,000 to 2,000,000.  At December 31, 2003, the Company has reserved 1,955,000 stock options that may be granted.  The exercise price of an option cannot be less than the closing price of the common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange on the day immediately preceding the grant of the option and the maximum term of all options is ten years.  The Company also has stock options outstanding relating to the period before the introduction of the fixed stock option plan.



The Board of Directors determines the term of the option (to a maximum of five years) and the time during which any option may vest.  All options granted during 2003 vested on the date granted.



The following table presents the outstanding options as of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 and changes during the years ended on those dates:



|                    |               |        |           |         |            | 2003   |            | 2002     |              | 2001     
|------------------- | ------------- | ------ | --------- | ------- | ---------- | ------ | ---------- | -------- | ------------ | ---------
|                    |               |        |           |         |            |        |            | Weighted |              |          
|                    |               |        |           |         |            |        |            | Average  |              |          
|                    |               |        |           |         |            |        |            | Exercise |              |          
|Fixed Options       |               | Shares |           | Price   |            | Shares |            | Price    |              | Shares   
|                    |               |        |           |         |            |        |            |          |              |          
|Outstanding at      |               |        |           |         |            |        |            |          |              |          
|                    | beginning of  |        |           |         |            |        |            |          |              |          
|                    | year          |        |           |         | 2,734,533  |        | $     0.44 |          | 1,759,533    |          
|Granted             |               |        |           | 504,000 |            | 0.85   |            | 975,000  |              | 0.55     
|Reduction due to    |               |        |           |         |            |        |            |          |              |          
|                    | amalgamation  | -      |           | -       |            | -      |            | -        |              | (306,029)
|Exercised           |               |        | 162,750   |         | 0.42       |        | -          |          | -            |          
|Issued in exchange  |               |        |           |         |            |        |            |          |              |          
|                    | for Fairfield |        |           |         |            |        |            |          |              |          
|                    | options       |        |           | -       |            | -      |            | -        |              | -        
|Outstanding at      |               |        |           |         |            |        |            |          |              |          
|                    | end of year   |        | 3,075,783 |         | $     0.53 |        | 2,734,533  |          | $       0.44 |          
|Options exercisable |               |        |           |         |            |        |            |          |              |          
|                    | at year-end   |        | 3,075,783 |         |            |        | 2,734,533  |          |              |          









109

---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





9.

SHARE CAPITAL (Continued)



Options (continued)



The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2003:

Options Outstanding and ExercisableNumberExpiryExerciseof SharesDatePrice77,000May 4, 2005$           0.49675,000March 1, 20060.3091,092August 23, 20060.27930,000February 28, 20070.55379,000February 26, 20080.8075,000April 7, 20080.7450,000September 26, 20081.37644,691October 7, 20080.45154,000December 1, 20090.393,075,783




The weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted in the year ended December 31, 2003 was $0.43 (2002 - $0.17).  The fair value of these options were determined on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

20032002Risk free interest rate3.3%4.2%Expected life4.5 years5 yearsExpected volatility62%60%Expected dividends$Nil$Nil




110



---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





10.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS



A company controlled by the founding shareholder of the Company was paid $110,400 for technical services and website management services during 2003 (2002 - $102,000;  2001 - $13,000).



A company controlled by a relative of the founding shareholder of the Company was paid $80,064 for geological services during 2003 (2002 - $68,300;  2001 - $43,550).



An officer of the Company was paid $53,075 for professional services rendered during 2003 (2002 - $48,800;  2001 - $20,800).



The above transactions were recorded at the amounts agreed to between the parties.





11.

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION



Supplemental information regarding non-cash transactions is as follows:



Years ended December 31,200320022001Investing activitiesAcquisition of subsidiary$                   -$                  -$    1,711,312Acquisition of fixed assetsin exchange for mineralproperties recoveries25,000--Financing activitiesIssuance of common sharesfor mineral properties-350,00072,500Issuance of common sharesfor purchase of mill-79,350-




Other supplementary information:

Years ended December 31,200320022001Interest paid$            2,436$                   -$                  -Income and mining taxes paid34,461110,154-










111

---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





12.

SEGMENTED INFORMATION



The Company operates in one reportable operating segment, being the acquisition and exploration of mineral resource properties.



The Company's revenues arose primarily from gold sales, interest income on corporate cash reserves and revenue from mineral properties.  The Company has non-current assets in the following geographic locations:

20032002Canada$     2,687,615$   1,761,048Mexico2,066,0811,898,810$     4,753,696$   3,659,858




The Company earns revenue in the following geographic locations:



200320022001Canada$       110,230$         122,538$         30,260Mexico--278$       110,230$         122,538$         30,538






13.

FINANCIAL RISK



The Company is exposed to financial risk arising from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and the degree of volatility of these rates.  The Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk.





14.

FAIR VALUE



The Company's financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, marketable securities and accounts payable and accrued liabilities.  The fair values of these financial instruments approximate their carrying values.







112

---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





15.

INCOME TAXES



The Company's Canadian income tax rate is approximately 37.6% (2002 - 39.6%;  2001 - 45%) while the Mexico income tax rate is approximately 35%.  The provision for income taxes differs from the amounts computed by applying the statutory rates to the loss before tax provision due to the following:



200320022001Statutory rate37.6%39.6%45.0%Income taxes recovered at theCanadian statutory rate$      425,000$   1,207,300$       292,540Effect of lower tax rates in foreign jurisdiction(1,200)(3,900)(6,863)Non-deductible expenses(83,000)(61,000)-340,8001,142,400285,677Tax losses not recognized inperiod benefit arose(340,800)(1,142,400)(285,677)$                  -$                 -$                  -




The approximate tax effects of each type of temporary difference that gives rise to future tax assets are as follows:



20032002Operating loss carryforwards$    2,241,000$      1,799,000Canadian exploration expenditures and foreignexploration and development costs inexcess of book value of resource properties3,616,0003,153,000Impairment of long-term investment21,80021,800Undeducted capital cost allowance on fixed assets71,00093,6005,949,8005,067,400Valuation loss provision(5,949,800)(5,067,400)$                   -$                    -




At December 31, 2003, the Company had operating loss carryforwards available for tax purposes in Canada and Mexico of $6,305,000 which expire between 2005 and 2013.







113

---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





16.

CONTINGENCY



The Company was assessed additional mineral tax of $197,233 plus interest of $84,638 by the British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mines (the
"Ministry"). The assessment relates to the deductibility of certain expenditures between February 1, 1995 and January 31, 1997.  While management intends to defend its position, the outcome of this issue is uncertain.  In order to reduce the exposure to interest charges, the Company paid $281,871.  This amount will be refunded with interest if the Company is successful in defending its position.



In addition, should the Company be unsuccessful in defending its position, approximately $353,000 will be payable in respect of gold sales in fiscal 2000 to 2002.  The Company has provided for the liability arising from the assessment.  Any recovery will be credited to operations when received.





17.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES



These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles ("Canadian GAAP") which, in these financial statements are different in some respects from those in the United States ("U.S. GAAP").  The following is a reconciliation:

20032002Consolidated Balance SheetsTotal assets under Canadian GAAP$    10,341,770$   5,635,752Write-off of deferred exploration costs (a)(1,358,352)(683,936)Adjustment to marketable securities (c)899,211180,760Total assets under U.S. GAAP$      9,882,629$   5,132,576Shareholders' equity under Canadian GAAP$      9,854,481$   5,181,485Write-off of deferred exploration costs (a)(1,358,352)(633,936)Adjustment to marketable securities (c)899,211180,760Shareholders' equity under U.S. GAAP$      9,395,340$   4,728,309






114

---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





17.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (Continued)



200320022001Consolidated Statements ofLoss and DeficitNet loss under Canadian GAAP$   (1,326,305)$     (3,198,025)$        (650,095)Write-off of current perioddeferred exploration costs (a)(742,857)(780,647)(135,376)Add back of deferred explorationcosts written off in the currentyear (a)68,4411,265,86947,595Gold recoveries in the currentyear applied to reduce deferredexploration costs (a)-140,886-Reversal of retroactive applicationof accounting change (b)-162,000-Net loss under U.S. GAAP$   (2,000,721)$     (2,409,917)$        (737,876)Net loss per share underU.S. GAAP$            (0.09)$              (0.13)$             (0.05)




200320022001Consolidated Statements ofCash FlowsOperating activitiesOperating activities underCanadian GAAP$      (911,766)$      (855,487)$      (296,761)Exploration (a)(742,857)(780,647)(135,376)Operating activities underU.S. GAAP(1,654,623)(1,636,134)(432,137)Investing activitiesInvesting activities underCanadian GAAP(993,588)(832,251)283,262Deferred exploration (a)742,857780,647135,376Investing activities underU.S. GAAP(250,731)(51,604)418,638






115

---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





17.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (Continued)



(a)

Canadian GAAP allows exploration costs and costs of acquiring mineral rights to be capitalized during the search for a commercially mineable body of ore.  Under US GAAP, exploration expenditures can only be deferred subsequent to the establishment of mining reserves.  For US GAAP purposes, the Company therefore expensed its exploration expenditures.



(b)

During 2003, the Company adopted the fair value based method of accounting under Canadian GAAP for stock-based compensation, as described in Notes 2 (j) and 3, with retroactive application with restatement of the prior year's income statement.  Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 148, Accounting for Stock-based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure, issued by the United States Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") provides alternative methods of transition for entities that voluntarily change to the fair value based method of accounting and amends the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-based Compensation.  For US GAAP purposes, the Company has adopted SFAS No. 123 prospectively as of January 1, 2003.  As a result, the stock option compensation expense recognized in 2002 under Canadian GAAP has been reversed for US GAAP purposes.



Prior to 2002, in accordance with SFAS No. 123 and Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, which specifies use of the intrinsic value method, since stock options were granted at the quoted market value of the Company's common shares at the date of grant, no compensation cost was recognized by the Company under US GAAP.



Had the fair value assigned to the stock options granted during the year ended December 31, 2002 been charged to net earnings, the net loss for US GAAP purposes for the year ended December 31, 2002 would have been $2,571,917 while the basic and diluted loss per share would remain unchanged.  The weighted average assumptions used for this calculation are consistent with those disclosed in Note 9.



Under Canadian GAAP, the measurement of the recorded stock-based compensation, as well as the assumptions and methodology, are consistent with those prescribed by SFAS No. 123.





116

---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





17.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (Continued)



(c)

In May 1993, the FASB issued SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities ("SFAS No. 115").  Under SFAS No. 115, management determines the appropriate classification of investments in debt and equity securities at the time of purchase and re-evaluates such designation as of each balance sheet date.  Under SFAS No. 115, equity securities and long-term investments are classified as available-for-sale securities and accordingly, is required to include the net unrealized holding gain on these securities in other comprehensive income.  SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components (revenue, expenses, gains and losses) in a full set of general purpose financial statements.  Details would be disclosed as follows:



200320022001Net loss under U.S. GAAP$   (2,000,721)$   (2,409,917)$    (737,876)Other comprehensive incomeAdjustment to unrealizedgains on available-for-salesecurities718,451119,530(770)Comprehensive loss underU.S. GAAP$   (1,282,270)$   (2,290,387)$    (738,646)










117

---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





17.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (Continued)



(d)

In June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which established accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities.  SFAS No. 133 requires an entity to measure all derivatives at fair value and to recognize them in the balance sheet as an asset or liability, depending on the entity's rights or obligations under the applicable derivative contract.  On June 15, 2000, the FASB issued SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities - an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133, which amends the accounting and reporting standards of SFAS No. 133 for certain derivative instruments and certain hedging activities.  The Company's adoption of this statement on January 1, 2001 did not have an effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations.



(e)

Under Canadian GAAP, future income taxes are calculated based on enacted or substantially enacted tax rates applicable to future years.  Under US GAAP, only enacted rates are used in the calculation of future income taxes.  This difference in GAAP did not result in a difference in the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001.



(f)

Under Canadian income tax legislation, a company is permitted to issue shares whereby the company agrees to incur qualifying expenditures and renounce the related income tax deductions to the investors.  The Company has accounted for the issue of flow-through shares using the deferral method in accordance with Canadian GAAP.  At the time of issue, the funds received are recorded as share capital.  For U.S. GAAP, the premium paid in excess of the market value is credited to other liabilities and included in income as the qualifying expenditures are made.  There was no premium on the flow-through shares issued for all periods presented.



Also, notwithstanding whether there is a specific requirement to segregate the funds, the flow-through funds which are unexpended at the consolidated balance sheet dates are considered to be restricted and are not considered to be cash or cash equivalents under U.S. GAAP.  As at December 31, 2003, unexpended flow-through funds were $393,481 (2002 - $127,305).





118

---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





17.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (Continued)



(g)

Recent accounting pronouncements



In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations ("SFAS 143"), which addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and (or) the normal operation of a long-lived assets, except for certain obligations of leases.  SFAS 143 requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred.  When the liability is initially recorded an entity capitalizes the cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived assets.  Over time the liability is accreted to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is amortized over the useful life of the related asset.  Upon settlement of the liability, an entity either settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss upon settlement.  SFAS 143 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002 with earlier application encouraged.  The Company has determined that the adoption of the Statement on its financial statements is not material.



In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.  This statements supersedes SFAS No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of.  Although retaining many of the fundamental recognition and measurement provisions of SFAS No. 121, the new rules significantly change the criteria that would have to be met to classify an asset as held-for-sale.  The statement also supersedes certain provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operations - Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions, and will require expected future operating losses from discontinued operations to be displayed in discontinued operations in the period(s) in which the losses are incurred rather than as of the measurement date, as presently required.  As required by SFAS No. 144, the Company adopted this new statement on March 1, 2002.  The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.





119

---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





17.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (Continued)



(g)

Recent accounting pronouncements (continued)



In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statement No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections.  Among other things, SFAS No. 145 rescinds both SFAS No. 4, Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of  Debt, and the amendment to SFAS No. 4, SFAS No. 64, Extinguishment of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking Fund Requirements.  Through this rescission, SFAS No. 145 eliminates the requirement (in both SFAS No. 4 and SFAS No. 64) that gains and losses from the extinguishment of debt be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item, net of the related income tax effect.  Generally, SFAS No. 145 is effective for transactions occurring after May 15, 2002.  The adoption of SFAS No. 145 does not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or its financial position.



In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal of Activities.  SFAS No. 146 requires that the liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized at its fair value when the liability is incurred.  Under previous guidance, a liability for certain exit costs was recognized at the date that management committed to an exit plan, which was generally before the actual liability had occurred.  As SFAS No. 146 is effective only for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002, the adoption of this statement does not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003.



In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45,
Guarantor's Accounting and  Disclosure Requirements for Guarantee, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, ("FIN 45").  FIN 45 requires that upon issuance of a guarantee, a guarantor must recognize a liability for the fair value of an obligation assumed under a guarantee.  FIN 45 also requires additional disclosures by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about the obligations associated with guarantees issued.  The recognition provisions of FIN 45 will be effective for any guarantees that are issued or modified after December 31, 2002.  The Company has determined that the impact of the Statement on the Company's results of operations or financial position is not material.





120



---

ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

(An exploration stage company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





17.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (Continued)



(g)

Recent accounting pronouncements (continued)



In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, ("FIN 46") that addresses the consolidation of variable interest entities.  In December 2003, the FASB issued a revised Interpretation
"FIN 46R".  Under the revised Interpretation, an entity deemed to be a business, based on certain specified criteria, need not be evaluated to determine if it is a Variable Interest Entity.  The Company must apply the provisions to variable interests in entities created before February 1, 2003 during the quarter ended December 31, 2003.  Adoption of FIN 46 and FIN 46R did not have an impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.



In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement No. 149 ("SFAS No. 149"), Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.  SFAS No. 149 is intended to result in more consistent reporting of contracts as either freestanding derivative instruments subject to Statement 133 in its entirety, or as hybrid instruments with debt host contracts and embedded derivative features.  In addition, SFAS No. 149 clarifies the definition of a derivative by providing guidance on the meaning of initial net investments related to derivatives.  SFAS No. 149 is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003.  The Company does not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 149 will have a material effect on its consolidated financial positions, results of operations or cash flows.



In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement No. 150 ("SFAS No. 150"), Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.  SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for classifying and measuring as liabilities certain financial instruments that embody obligations of the issuer and have characteristics of both liabilities an equity.  SFAS No. 150 represents a significant change in practice in the accounting for a number of financial instruments, including mandatorily redeemable equity instruments and certain equity derivatives.  SFAS No. 150 is effective for all financial instruments created or modified after May 31, 2003, and to other instruments as of September 1, 2003.  The Company does not expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 150 will have a material impact on its results of operations or financial position.





18.

SUBSEQUENT EVENT



Subsequent to year end, 615,075 share purchase warrants were exercised at an average price of $0.69 per common share and 60,000 stock options were exercised at an average price of $0.40 per share.







121

---







ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

Schedule 1

(An exploration stage company)

Consolidated Schedules of General and Administrative Expenses

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





Cumulativeamount sinceincorporationSeptember 25,1980 toDecember 31,Years ended December 31,2003200320022001Bad debts$      130,551$              -$              -$              -Bank charges and interest38,4765,8234,7323,524B.C. mineral taxes36,89736,897--Depreciation348,26938,85243,16626,882Employee benefits10,512---Insurance25,4266,0355,8262,910Management services16,775---Office and licenses883,790112,08797,25540,407Professional fees1,726,397201,356222,950200,855Rent404,82389,16887,20818,229Stock exchange fees174,08421,93055,1965,945Telephone131,47514,21212,6865,562Transfer agent fees142,63111,67412,43710,809Travel and promotion371,20267,72957,29711,959Write-off of incorporation costs3,298---$    4,444,606$    605,763$      598,753$      327,082




122

---



ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

Schedule 2

(An exploration stage company)

Consolidated Schedule of Share Capital Since Inception

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





NumberPriceAmountFor cash upon incorporation1$      1.00$                  1For cash from principal (founder's shares)750,0000.017,500For cash1,010,5280.15151,579For cash292,5000.2573,925For cash from related company of principal180,0000.2545,000Balance December 31, 19852,233,029278,005For cash pursuant to public offering, net of issue expenses700,0000.56392,568For mineral property40,0000.7028,000Balance December 31, 19862,973,029698,573For cash pursuant to private placement, net of issue expense200,0000.83165,750For cash pursuant to private placement300,0001.00300,000For cash pursuant to private placement, net of issue expense150,0001.34201,432Balance December 31, 19873,623,0291,365,755For cash pursuant to private placement171,0001.75299,250For cash pursuant to private placement, net of issue expenses297,8030.90267,734For cash40,0001.1044,000For mineral property40,0001.0040,000Balance December 31, 19884,171,8322,016,739For cash pursuant to private placement, net of issue expenses112,0551.10123,260Balance December 31, 19894,283,8872,139,999For cash pursuant to private placement177,7780.4580,000For cash on exercise of stock options49,5000.6833,660For 100,000 common shares of Pacific Sentinel Gold Corp.300,0000.73219,000For cash on exercise of stock options26,0000.7519,500For cash on exercise of stock options10,0000.727,200Balance December 31, 19904,847,1652,499,359For cash on exercise of stock options40,0000.7228,800Balance December 31, 19914,887,1652,528,159For mineral property28,0000.7120,000For cash on exercise of stock options50,0000.6812,500For cash on exercise of stock options10,0000.737,500For cash on exercise of stock options10,0000.282,800For cash pursuant to private placement137,0000.5068,500Balance December 31, 1992 (carried forward)5,122,1652,639,459




123



---



ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

Schedule 2

(An exploration stage company)

Consolidated Schedule of Share Capital Since Inception

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





|                                                               |         |            |             |             |           |                | Number |  | Price |  | Amount
|-------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | ----------- | ----------- | --------- | -------------- | ------ |  | ----- |  | ------
|                                                               |         |            |             |             |           |                |        |  |       |  |       
|                                                               |         |            |             |             |           |                |        |  |       |  |       
|Balance December 31, 1992 (brought forward)                    |         | 5,122,165  |             |             |           | $    2,639,459
|For cash on exercise of stock options                          |         | 290,000    |             | 0.28        |           | 81,200        
|For cash on exercise of stock options                          |         | 50,000     |             | 0.33        |           | 16,500        
|For mineral property                                           |         | 24,827     |             | 1.45        |           | 36,000        
|For cash pursuant to private placement                         |         | 85,000     |             | 2.34        |           | 198,900       
|For cash pursuant to private placement, net of issue expense   | 235,046 |            | 2.13        |             | 500,930  
|For cash on exercise of stock options                          |         | 64,000     |             | 1.08        |           | 69,120        
|For finders' fee                                               |         | 8,857      |             | 0.70        |           | 6,200         
|For mineral property                                           |         | 10,000     |             | 0.50        |           | 5,000         
|For finders' fee                                               |         | 5,000      |             | 3.30        |           | 16,500        
|Balance December 31, 1993                                      |         | 5,894,895  |             |             |           | 3,569,809     
|For cash on exercise of stock options                          |         | 110,000    |             | 1.08        |           | 118,800       
|For cash pursuant to private placement, net of issue expense   | 200,000 |            | 1.18        |             | 236,800  
|For finders' fee                                               |         | 10,642     |             | 0.70        |           | 7,449         
|For finders' fee                                               |         | 12,307     |             | 1.56        |           | 19,200        
|Balance December 31, 1994                                      |         | 6,227,844  |             |             |           | 3,952,058     
|For cash pursuant to private placement, net of issue expense   | 200,000 |            | 1.50        |             | 285,000  
|For cash pursuant to private placement, net of issue expense   | 75,000  |            | 1.30        |             | 94,575   
|For cash on exercise of stock options                          |         | 120,000    |             | 1.28        |           | 153,800       
|For cash on exercise of stock options                          |         | 250,000    |             | 1.13        |           | 282,100       
|For cash on exercise of share purchase warrants                |         | 100,000    |             | 1.28        |           | 128,000       
|For finders' fee                                               |         | 6,428      |             | 0.70        |           | 4,500         
|For mineral property                                           |         | 39,308     |             | 1.59        |           | 62,500        
|For mineral property                                           |         | 37,037     |             | 1.35        |           | 50,000        
|Balance December 31, 1995                                      |         | 7,055,617  |             |             |           | 5,012,533     
|For cash on exercise of stock options                          |         | 672,000    |             | 1.08 - 1.49 |           | 899,100       
|For cash on exercise of share purchase warrants                |         | 275,000    |             | 1.40 - 1.50 |           | 405,000       
|For cash pursuant to private placement, net of issue expense   | 120,000 |            | 2.00        |             | 240,000  
|For cash pursuant to private placement, net of issue expense   | 620,000 |            | 3.25        |             | 1,894,100
|For cash on exercise of stock options                          |         | 720,000    |             | 1.43 - 1.86 |           | 1,221,050     
|For mineral property                                           |         | 10,000     |             | 3.20        |           | 32,000        
|Balance December 31, 1996                                      |         | 9,472,617  |             |             |           | 9,703,783     
|For cash on exercise of stock options                          |         | 60,000     |             | 1.66 - 2.63 |           | 109,300       
|For cash on exercise of share purchase warrants                |         | 50,000     |             | 2.00        |           | 100,000       
|For cash pursuant to private placements, net of issue expenses | 388,000 |            | 1.87        |             | 725,560  
|For mineral property                                           |         | 50,000     |             | 2.90        |           | 145,000       
|For cash pursuant to private placement, net of issue expenses  | 296,000 |            | 3.14 - 3.53 |             | 1,013,371
|Balance December 31, 1997 (carried forward)                    |         | 10,316,617 |             |             |           | 11,797,014    



124



---



ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.

Schedule 2

(An exploration stage company)

Consolidated Schedule of Share Capital Since Inception

(Expressed in Canadian dollars)





| |                                                 |  |             |  |           |  | Number        |  | Price |  | Amount
| | ----------------------------------------------- |  | ----------- |  | --------- |  | ------------- |  | ----- |  | ------
| |                                                 |  |             |  |           |  |               |  |       |  |       
| |                                                 |  |             |  |           |  |               |  |       |  |       
| | Balance December 31, 1997 (brought forward)     |  | 10,316,617  |  |           |  | $  11,797,014
| | For cash on exercise of share purchase warrants |  | 359,000     |  | 1.05      |  | 376,950      
| | For mineral property                            |  | 50,000      |  | 2.90      |  | 145,000      
| | Balance, December 31, 1998                      |  | 10,725,617  |  |           |  | 12,318,964   
| | For cash pursuant to private placement          |  | 1,370,000   |  | 0.23      |  | 308,250      
| | For mineral property                            |  | 50,000      |  | 2.90      |  | 145,000      
| | Balance, December 31, 1999                      |  | 12,145,617  |  |           |  | 12,772,214   
| | For cash on exercise of stock options           |  | 100,000     |  | 0.35      |  | 35,000       
| | For cash pursuant to private placement          |  | 1,000,000   |  | 0.345     |  | 345,000      
| | For cash on exercise of share purchase warrants |  | 10,000      |  | 0.225     |  | 2,250        
| | For mineral properties                          |  | 25,000      |  | 2.90      |  | 72,500       
| | Balance, December 31, 2000                      |  | 13,280,617  |  |           |  | 13,226,964   
| | For mineral properties                          |  | 25,000      |  | 2.90      |  | 72,500       
| | Issuance to acquire Fairfield Minerals Ltd.     |  | 6,877,681   |  | 0.25      |  | 1,711,312    
| | Adjustment to issued shares on amalgamation     |  | (3,060,292) |  | -         |  | -            
| | Balance, December 31, 2001                      |  | 17,123,006  |  |           |  | 15,010,776   
| | For cash pursuant to private placements         |  | 4,150,000   |  | 0.43-0.55 |  | 1,897,943    
| | For cash on exercise of share purchase warrants |  | 134,750     |  | 0.38      |  | 51,312       
| | For purchase of mill                            |  | 122,077     |  | 0.65      |  | 79,350       
| | For mineral properties                          |  | 388,889     |  | 0.90      |  | 350,000      
| | Balance, December 31, 2002                      |  | 21,918,722  |  |           |  | 17,389,381   
| | For cash pursuant to private placements         |  | 2,773,800   |  | 0.70-2.15 |  | 2,362,704    
| | For cash on exercise of share purchase warrants |  | 2,771,807   |  | 0.42-0.95 |  | 1,648,664    
| | For cash on exercise of stock options           |  | 162,750     |  | 0.30-0.55 |  | 68,498       
| | Balance, December 31, 2003                      |  | 27,627,079  |  |           |  | $ 21,469,247 



125



---







SIGNATURE







The Registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this Annual Report on its behalf.









Almaden Minerals Ltd.

Registrant









Dated:  May 11, 2004

By /s/Duane Poliquin

Duane Poliquin, President



126