alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Thompson, Respondent, vs. Friederich and others, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Stephens, Sletteland & Sutherland*of Madison.

For the respondent: *Olin & Butler*of Madison,

*By the Court*— Judgment affirmed,
# C_2005045EN.01001001.xml

| 19.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/10

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 9 December 2004

in Case C-523/03: Commission of the European Communities v Biotrast SA (1)

1

(Arbitration clause - Recovery of moneys advanced - Interest - Default procedure)

(2005/C 45/19)

Language of the case: Greek

In Case C-523/03 the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: D. Triantafyllou and N. Korogiannakis) v Biotrast S.A., established in Thessaloniki (Greece) – action under Article 238 EC, brought on 15 December 2003 – the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues and K. Schiemann, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 9 December 2004, in which it:

Commission of the European Communities

Biotrast S.A

| 1) | Orders Biotrast SA to pay to the Commission of the European Communities a capital sum of EUR 661 838.82 plus interest at the rate of 4.77 % per year from 31 December 2001 until 31 December 2002, at the rate of 6.77 % per year from 1 January 2003 until the date of the present judgment, and at an annual rate applied under Greek law, now Article 3(2) of Law 2842/2000 on the replacement of the Drachma by the Euro, up to a maximum rate of 6.77 % per year, from the date of the present judgment until the payment of the debt in full. |
| --- | --- |

1)

Orders Biotrast SA to pay to the Commission of the European Communities a capital sum of EUR 661 838.82 plus interest at the rate of 4.77 % per year from 31 December 2001 until 31 December 2002, at the rate of 6.77 % per year from 1 January 2003 until the date of the present judgment, and at an annual rate applied under Greek law, now Article 3(2) of Law 2842/2000 on the replacement of the Drachma by the Euro, up to a maximum rate of 6.77 % per year, from the date of the present judgment until the payment of the debt in full.

| 2) | Orders Biotrast S.A. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Biotrast S.A. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 59 of 6.3.2004

1

---
.

6 j en AP4 Clren°00 Lt. Alec.

Del.III.5 2c57-71

C40.56.4n C•24t

S

not.S, ‘41

.

, :

••••••••• • t...

5:444

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

latatiot 11-111111

MEMORANDUM

November 10, 1971

CAPTA1111111

At long last, attached is a copy of the

POPPY Management Agreement. We are

retaining the original in our office and

pave made no distribution of the agreement

beyond internal and to you.

OPP,11.TR.

Major, USAF

Assistant Deputy Director

for Plans and Policy

NRO Staff

Del 192-71)
#### Park *v.*Cochran and others.

Ejectment. The Plaintiff stated his title to have been derived under a patent to JYewberry, who conveyed to *Carrol*and *Dyer,*who conveyed to the'Plaintiff. He offered to produce an office copy of the deed from *Carrol*and *Dyer; Mr. Williams*objected to the reading of it, unless the Plaintiff would-swear he had not the original in his possession or power.

*Per curiam*

The cop$t cannot be read, unless the Plaintiff will swear he has not the original nor can procure it. The Plaintiff was nonsuited.

Note. — Vide *Blanton*v. *Miller,*and note thereto, *ante*4.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 30 (Friday, February 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03055]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Third Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 232, Airborne Selective 
Calling Equipment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 232, Airborne 
Selective Calling Equipment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
third meeting of RTCA Special Committee 232, Airborne Selective Calling 
Equipment.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 4-5, 2015 from 9:00 a.m.-5:00 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Novotel Paris Orly Rungis Hotel 
Rungis, France. Hosted by Rabah Bouda.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You may contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1150 18th Street NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone 
at (202) 833-9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site http://www.rtca.org for directions.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 232.

March 4-5

<bullet> Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks
<bullet> Agenda Overview
<bullet> Review/Approval of Minutes from Plenary #2
<bullet> Status of Other SELCAL Industry Activities/Committees
<bullet> Review of Selective Calling (SELCAL) Action Items
<bullet> Review SC-232 Completion Schedule
<bullet> Review of Draft MOPS
<bullet> Continue Drafting MOPS
<bullet> Other Business.
<bullet> Date and Place of Next Meetings
<bullet> Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 10, 2015.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Program Oversight and Administration, 
Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-03055 Filed 2-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
# C_2004262EN.01002602.xml

| 23.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/26

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 14 July 2004

in Case T 360/02: Wolf-Dieter Graf Yorck von Wartenburg v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Death of the applicant - No continuance of suit by estate - No need to adjudicate)

(2004/C 262/50)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-360/02: Wolf-Dieter Graf Yorck von Wartenburg, former temporary servant of the European Parliament, residing in Wittibreut (Germany), represented by H.-H. Heyland, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agent: J. Currall, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for annulment of a Commission communication of 17 May 2002 concerning the attachment of sums deducted from the pension of the applicant by a national court and compensation for the damage suffered — the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), composed of: B. Vesterdorf, President, P. Mengozzi and M.E. Martins Ribeiro, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on14 July 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | The parties shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The parties shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 8. 3.2003.

1

---
ISL INSTRUCTION.

ATTEMPT 715 P.O. 2, AT. 1320:3460 PST

TINS

• •• '

ste.0* sAftikeirtil sea 694i. itrricroAilini. 

PROM
154.74 . SZ

•

;1504:: 6

ma . 2 .sos

044 szp

Sic

1,2. arc

. ; 412 diPt -115111101r44.1111P.11201014

. . •

 SRS

ie 4

•

!'; •;T:
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1242 

To amend the Natural Gas Act to require the Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission to consider regional constraints in natural gas supply and 

whether a proposed LNG terminal would benefit regional consumers 

of natural gas before approving or disapproving an application for the 

LNG terminal, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2015 

Mr. KING introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Natural Gas Act to require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to consider regional constraints in natural gas supply and whether a proposed 

LNG terminal would benefit regional consumers of natural gas before approving or disapproving an application 

for the LNG terminal, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Regional Gas Con5 sumer Protection Act’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1242 IS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIRED CONSIDERATIONS FOR APPROVAL OR 

2 DISAPPROVAL OF APPLICATIONS FOR LNG 

3 TERMINALS. 

4 Section 3(e) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 

5 717b(e)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(5) REQUIRED CONSIDERATIONS.—Before the 

7 Commission may approve or disapprove an applica8 tion for the siting, construction, expansion, or oper9 ation of an LNG terminal under this subsection, the 

10 Commission shall consider— 

11 ‘‘(A) regional constraints in the natural 

12 gas supply of the United States; and 

13 ‘‘(B) whether the application includes pro14 visions of benefit to the regional consumers of 

15 natural gas that would be affected by the expor16 tation of natural gas.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
, 

. ( 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

DECLASSIFIED BY: C/IART 

DECLASSIFIED ON: 25 JULY 2012 

( 

OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY DIVISION 

OPTO-MECHANICAL DESIGN ENGINEERING 

Memorandum ME 73 

TO: D. Launder 

L.B. Molaskey j 0 

DATE: December 14, 1971 

FROM: 

SUBJECT: Recovery of RV-3 SPO 20053 Task 10272 

From October 27, 1971 through December 10, 1971 I have been on·a 

trip to ~he recovery site of RV-3 off of Hawaii. Charges for my time for that 

period, therefore, should be applied to SPO 20053 ~ 10272 directly. Total 

time applied should be 264 hours based on 6 315 five day Weeks at. 40 hours Fer 

week. 

An accounting of my expenditures is' being processed and will follow 

shortly. No further charges are anticipated in .the immediate future pendin~ 

customer direction. 

;to 

,/ 

; 

.i 

LBM/cj 

cc: R.W. Jones 

B.L. Todd· 

P.V. Jones 

/1,.-11/";') I 

~ .. J .. ; r· '.-,~ ~ 1. ~·""f 

'of ,~. It. •• ,. -_ t ... '" "". '.e.
ex4_5.htm


    
      

    

    Exhibit
4.5

    


    


    The
following is a summary of amendments to the Ford Motor Company Savings and Stock
Investment Plan for Salaried Employees, effective April 18, 2007:

    


    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              ·

            	
              Remove
      the restriction that limits exchanges into the Ford Stock Fund to no more
      than five times per month.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Roy Michael Geisendorff, * From the 70 th District Court

of Ector County

Trial Court No. A

- 45,283.

Vs. No. 11

- 16

- 00 186

- CR * June 14 , 2018

The Sta te of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Dauphinot, S.J.

(Panel consists of: Willson, J.,

Bailey, J. , and Dauphinot, S. J., sitting

by assignment )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accorda nce with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Masport of the GONRAE Advisory Group on Cone /cOMSEO/ ELIE
i “prestnone Rese:
Vice - arch
Laboratories

2. Dr. Howard f. Engstrom :
Vice President & Executive Asst., Univac Diy.

1» Mr. John C. McPherson
3 Vice President, IEM Corporation

a
Vice
Airborne Instrements

Laboratory

5. Mr. Charles 8. Weaver
Director, Office Foreign Programs .
ODORAE :

6. Mr. Howard A. Stadermann

¢ Mr. Ralph C, Clark
7 Assistant Director DR&E (COMMUNICATIONS)

8. Mr. Lowel R. Datley
Deputy Assistant Director DRAE (SPECIAL mosEcrS)

9- Col. Arthur EB. Suith, USAF
Military Assistant, Office Asst. Dir. DRAE (Special Projects)

~Office of Spectal Operetions, csp

10. Mr. Clyde W. E1l4ott
i. Mr. Jobn J. Monroe



9 therefore, that we should endeavor to
‘achieve the earliest flight dates for the photographic recovery and
in that priority.
. Photographic Headout ‘payloads/. I further feel that the ferret payload
should be reduced to an engineering effort program with flight testing
being excluded fron the program at this time. . Consideration should be
given to possible delaying elements, added insurance against such
delays and specifically to the desirability of introducing into the

+ Bwgunttainy CFF IRT For,
Program,en additional payload type such as an advanced panoramic

camera which with recovery could provide broad coverage with comparatively

high resolution.



of the Air Force

Recoment the following named personnel be approved ae
meubere of the sbove-entitled comitice, the comittes #121
report thelr recomentations in four (k) weeks and be dissolved:

~Bev-Danel aeons ~ ~ GtrayRecconeteeance Penal, ain, woe
- ten nas = Wma

De, Willem Rambo ~ ~ Meuber, Reconnaissance Panel, SAB, WERG .
Rea Rgmee-Rikine- Mabe, Mviecey Orony ca. CoMrNE coum feLeT
te, Arthur Innish) ~ oZA
miter Gewmme ors ne
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1





               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



Dynamex Inc.
Dallas, TX



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement No. 333-19773 on Form S-8 of our report dated October 26, 2001,except
for note 6 which is as of November 9, 2001, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Dynamex Inc. appearing in the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2001.




/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
--------------------
    BDO Seidman, LLP


Dallas, Texas
November 13, 2001
tOC, WOlos 37 Sep 40,. Discoverer Recovery Operations

1st. Ind (vrocie)

TOt WDZ

Forwarded for appropriate action.

37 Sep 60

litISSEtt BtRCI

-i:olonel, P5AF.

hiel c, Staii

1 Atch

1 Cy -of apt an Discoverer

XV Recovery Activities

(1 cy w/d)

When attachments are withdrawn the

classification of Otis corrlispoi *:21 nce

will be down gre8ed to 741 

in accordance with MR 205-1.

•

WDL-2.
WDL/Col Soper/2275

Discoverer Recovery Operations SEP 27 1950

=GC

Attached is the original and one copy of the report on

Discoverer XV recovery activities rendered in compliance with

\MIND SO #695, 15 Sep 60. The report was prepared in triplicate;

disposition of the remaining copy is as shown on the appended

receipt.

The board's findings and recommendations were reviewed with

Gans Schriever and RitIand yesterday. Immediately following this

review (conducted by Cols Curtis/Soper) the getter was discussed

further in a separate meeting between teas Schriever and Ritland

and Col Moore.

3. As a result of the foregoing review, Oen Schriever directed

that he be given a detailed briefing on recovery plans prior to

the next Discoverer shot. It vas imphasised that the plans must

inclOde specific alternative plans far recovery actions in event

of capsule reentry outside the twist area; these alternative plans

should be world-vide in scope. It wets also stressed that recovery

operations employ resources and techniques to provide fast reaction,

i.e., primary reliance on fixed wing aircraft supported by paraArop

Personnel and equipped far both air sad sea snatch retrieval.

QAY f SOPR(

Cc.Jonel. USAF

A w..DCS;Pians 1s (*orations

$1(20!!T) lh,a 2 Oyu

S.*CURTZS

Colonel, WAY

Deputy Director for Plans

and Propene, SAISP

WDL-2
<PAGE>   1
                                                           EXHIBIT 10.30


                        DAILEY PETROLEUM SERVICES CORP.
                     1996 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK PLAN

                      NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT      

        Dailey Petroleum Services Corp. (the "Company") hereby grants to
Bernard J. Duroc-Danner (the "Optionee") the option to purchase 10,000 shares
of the Company's Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value (the "Common Stock"), at
a price of $6.50 for each share of Common Stock (the "Option"). This Option
shall be granted upon the terms and conditions substantially similar to those
contained in the Dailey Petroleum Services Corp. 1996 Non-Employee Director
Stock Option Plan (the "Plan").

        This Options shall be for a term commencing the date hereof and ending
on April 22, 2002, unless this Option is terminated earlier by reason of the
Optionee's termination of employment, as provided under the terms and
conditions of the Plan.

        This Option shall become exercisable in full on the first anniversary
of the date hereof.

        This Option is a non-qualified stock option which is not intended to be
governed by Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

        The Optionee, upon acceptance of this Option, accepts and agrees to be
bound by all the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Notwithstanding that
this Option is not granted pursuant to the Plan, the Optionee further agrees to
be bound by all the terms and conditions of the Plan applicable to non-qualified
stock options granted under the Plan.

        Granted effective as of the 23rd day of April, 1997.

                                                 DAILEY PETROLEUM SERVICES CORP.


                                                 By:    JAMES F. FARR
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                        James F. Farr

Accepted this 16th day of May, 1997.


/s/ BERNARD J. DUROC-DANNER
    ----------------------------
    Bernard J. Duroc-Danner
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

MAHOGANNÉ SOUL,

Plaintiff BelowAppellant,

v.

DENISE LAVERN STEPHENS 

and SARAH E. WILSON,

Defendants BelowAppellees.

§

§ No. 424, 2020

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ C.A. No. K20C-07-025

§

§

§

§

§

Submitted: September 10, 2021

Decided: October 25, 2021

Before VAUGHN, TRAYNOR, and MONTGOMERY-REEVES Justices.

ORDER

After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, it 

appears to the Court that the judgment of the Superior Court should be affirmed on 

the basis of its orders dated November 10, 2020 and November 30, 2020. Even 

assuming that the statute of limitations for some of the appellant’s claims did not 

expire until May 2020 and was therefore extended through July 1, 2020 by this 

Court’s Administrative Order No. 7, the appellant did not file her complaint until 

July 15, 2020, after the statute of limitations had expired for all of her claims. 
2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior 

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                              List of Subsidiaries
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

PARENT                                                  SUBSIDIARY
------                                                  ----------

<S>                                                    <C>
U.S. Plastic Lumber Corp.                               U.S. Plastic Lumber Ltd, a Delaware corporation

U.S. Plastic Lumber Corp.                               Clean Earth, Inc., a Delaware corporation

U.S. Plastic Lumber Corp.                               U.S. Plastic Lumber Finance Corporation, a Delaware
                                                        corporation

U.S. Plastic Lumber Ltd.                                The Eaglebrook Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Clean Earth, Inc.                                       Advanced Remediation of Delaware, Inc., a Delaware
                                                        corporation

Clean Earth, Inc.                                       Allied Waste Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Clean Earth, Inc.                                       Barbella Environmental Technologies, Inc., a New
                                                        Jersey corporation

Clean Earth, Inc.                                       Carteret Biocycle Corporation, a Delaware
                                                        corporation

Clean Earth, Inc.                                       Carteret Materials Corporation, a Delaware
                                                        corporation

Clean Earth, Inc.                                       Clean Earth of New Castle, Inc., a Delaware
                                                        corporation

Clean Earth, Inc.                                       Clean Earth of Philadelphia, Inc., a Delaware
                                                        corporation

Clean Earth, Inc.                                       Clean Earth of Maryland, Inc., a Maryland
                                                        corporation

Clean Earth, Inc.                                       Clean Rock Properties, Ltd., a Maryland corporation

Clean Earth, Inc.                                       Consolidated Technologies, Inc., a Pennsylvania
                                                        corporation

Clean Earth, Inc.                                       Integrated Technical Services, Inc. a Delaware
                                                        corporation

Clean Earth, Inc.                                       S & W Waste, Inc., a New Jersey corporation


U.S. Plastic Lumber Finance Corporation                 U.S. Plastic Lumber IP Corporation, a Delaware
                                                        corporation


</TABLE>
Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors
CNET Networks, Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-07667, 333-34491, 333-67325, and 333-78247) and
Forms S-3 (File Nos. 333-46203, 333-56633, 333-73023, 333-77065, 333-77757,
333-78585, 333-85513 and 333-90739) of CNET Networks, Inc. of our report
dated February 29, 2000, relating to consolidated balance sheets of CNET
Networks, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December
31, 1999, and our report on the supproting schedule dated February 29, 2000,
which reports appear in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K
of CNET Networks, Inc.


                                            KPMG LLP


San Francisco, California
March 29, 1999