alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         1,176
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  474,449
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    212,520
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               208,438
<PP&E>                                         500,792
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,397,375
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,097,485
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          116,776
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       7,858
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,824,744)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,397,375
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               903,371
<CGS>                                          553,102
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  894,994
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,523
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (549,248)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (549,248)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5 D 2 3

- 3369 LT Case No. 2017

- CF

- 4308

_____________________________
N ATHANIEL S TEPHENSON ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
, a Case of Original Jurisdiction

.
Nathaniel Stephenson, Raiford, pro se.

No Appearance for Respondent.

December 21, 2023

P ER C URIAM

. This Court previously affirmed Petitioner’s direct appeal and thereafter, dismissed several petitions and appeals filed in this Court stemming from Marion County Circuit Court Case No. 2017

- CF

- 4308. Because it appears that Petitioner’s filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Petitioner is cautioned that any further pro se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from the identified case number may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing s in this Court and referral to pris on officials for2

disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (202 3 ); State v. Spencer , 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999). Moreover , the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed November 1 6 , 2023 , is dismissed

. See Richardson v. State , 918 So. 2d 999 , 1002

– 03 (Fla. 5 th DCA 2006)

.
P ETITIONER W ARNED ; P ETITION D ISMISSED

.
J AY , H ARRIS , and M AC I VER , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             807
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,534
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        447
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,588
<PP&E>                                             722
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,344
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,140
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,928
<SALES>                                          6,589
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                            3,182
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,071
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (71)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (670)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (677)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (677)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.13)


</TABLE>
-,ek;

LOJNMSSAGEFORM

74

•

4 ' -

k.

.1-f•ele44•6 MAW') "CMINTIMI

Boolt:. „MULTI .611461.11, .

csTs'Itpsfp pry •cA,

Viv40?-

:. -

• 44•Iretwl, 14,111 crpti‘

r..?' •

,1114,

It: • . • ,

N..

. ..•

,

, .

,

110.3:0CTi:t;87 R.EP013.T . .

.

•

.;q9Ng.57:LN4 Oi THOR BOOSTER,NC):: &AND; AG..3

. . ARBitAti6atApt-i4.6 4, W4S LAUWCD COW THE FIRST ATTE

. 

- • , - • , .

•

iagPilij-717:41;70! .:q9a42P17f EX:- 7 5-3 ; PAD!, 4, AT '113513,8. 77 PDT ON 9 OC

OB 162 ,•-x* prtxm4at, ii4tIrfc4.. OBJECTIVE'. TO PLACE.

.. 1/4T1.- :PAY14015.1i1 A i•mkti...Poi,4.1i164Bri'..,

Bçz 1*.i.pitogs OF 2HE TL GROUND oup41src:FA •

ctosaetANI).SYSTEM:xiult*d ThOR npos*:• Tgl,S;I:i.k.SOLTr:gp- 7 7? ' ABS ENCX 491,111)? 9:44PFTFD.§7,1EX3 NG COMMANDai YEN-

: ppm.KAIT :-., ......- -. .`'::..:44srp.....4q4#:4:, px.scAxirg co. 14..mArrps. 1. 19:11.43: 04.1nm . . . - : ,... . ,: ..fl 'i..,i ::, . 45 , :j.in •', T:,: ..1....i.t:, :; , -.; ,...1..: ' ',. 1.. , '....:! ' •. - , . 4 .

' ' .13.4C101..F.S7f.V.MANTEREAgiliTt .C.Tryt plApT,TALwrci CR;p. ITICAL :,...

.... ...

 .. . • . .•.

•

Nt

.P.'irs •

AT,,..633q. TWin-
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00538-CV

William Alec TISDALL, M.D., and William A. Tisdall, M.D., P.A. 

d/b/a Spine & Joint Pain Specialists,

Appellants

v.

Thomas VAREBROOK and Rebecca Varebrook,

Appellees

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-CI-06007

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment 

is AFFIRMED.

It is ORDERED that Appellees Thomas Varebrook and Rebecca Varebrook recover their 

costs on appeal from Appellants William Alec Tisdall, M.D., and William A. Tisdall, M.D., P.A. 

d/b/a Spine & Joint Pain Specialists. 

It is FURTHER ORDERED that Appellees recover the full amount of their judgment and 

their costs on appeal from Appellants and from Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, to the 

extent of Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland’s liability as surety on Supersedeas Bond 

No. 9305632.

SIGNED July 28, 2021.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice
EX-4.6






Exhibit 4.6




SECOND AMENDMENT




TO THE




THE SCOTTS COMPANY




EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN




     WHEREAS, The Scotts Company (the “Company”) sponsors The Scotts Company Executive Retirement
Plan (the “Plan”); and



     WHEREAS, the Company wants to the statement of the purpose of the Plan to reflect the current
function of the Plan;



     NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of January 1, 2000, Section I of the Plan is amended to provide:



     I. Name and Purpose




     The Scotts Company Executive Retirement Plan provides Eligible Employees with the
opportunity to defer bonuses (under the Executive Annual Incentive Plan) and compensation,
and supplements the benefits of Eligible Employees under The Scotts Company Retirement
Savings Plan. The benefits under the Plan are to be provided from the Plan on an unfunded
basis. It is intended that the Plan be exempt from the funding, participation, vesting and
fiduciary provisions of Title I of ERISA.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed as of the
14 day of January, 2000.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	THE SCOTTS COMPANY

 	 
	 	By:  	 /s/ Hadia Lefavre
 	 
	 	 	Hadia Lefavre, Senior Vice President Human 	 
	 	 	Resources Worldwide
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                       5
       
<S>                                                           <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              12-MOS
<CASH>                                                  7,102,791
<SECURITIES>                                           14,712,568
<RECEIVABLES>                                             253,629
<ALLOWANCES>                                               25,200
<INVENTORY>                                               152,580
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                0
<PP&E>                                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         26,132,964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           0
<BONDS>                                                10,174,633
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                    1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                             12,141,194
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           26,132,964
<SALES>                                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       16,386,540
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          412,387
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      2,382,818
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         5,611,439
<INCOME-TAX>                                            1,926,553
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     3,684,886
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           100,000
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                            3,584,886
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0.62
        





<PAGE>
Exhibit 4.1

To the shareholders of COMMTOUCH SOFTWARE LTD.

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Commtouch Software Ltd.
("the Company") as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and for each of the three years
in the period ended  December 31, 2000 and have issued our report  thereon dated
February 14, 2001  (included  elsewhere  in this  Registration  Statement).  Our
audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in Item 18(a)(2) of
this  Registration  Statement.  This  schedule  is  the  responsibility  of  the
Company's  management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits.

In our  opinion,  the  financial  statement  schedule  referred  to above,  when
considered in relation to the basic  consolidated  financial  statement taken as
whole,  present  fairly,  in  all material  respects the  information  set forth
therein.


                                                   KOST, FORER & GABBAY
                                         A member of Ernst & Young International


Tel-Aviv, Israel
February 14, 2001
3' 

PERSONNEL: 

Assigned: 

from USAF 

Attached: 

from USAF 

ARMY 

NAVY 

NASA 

!PROGRAM STATUS 

FUNCTIONS: 

• Control Room 

Reporting 

Status • 

Development Pins 

Programmi 

PERSONNEL: 

Assigned: 

from USAF 

Attached: 

from USAF 

RESOURCES 

& SUPPORT 

FUNCTIONS: 

Facilities 

Range 

Procurement 

Budget 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015. . 

ORGANIZATION OF MOL PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OFFICE IIMININIMISIN11111 

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE 

UNDERSECRETARY 

SPECIAL ASSISTANT FOR MOL 

Commander, MSC 

SAINTS 

MOL PROGRAM OFFICE 

Director 

Deputy Director 

IKWIIIUMTATION 

I

PLANS & 

MPERMIENTS 

L 

FUNCTIONS: 

Experiments 

Studies 

Long Range Plans 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT &INTEGRATION 

FUNCTIONS: 

Integration 

T-III(Monitor) 

Gemini B 

MOL 

Bioastronautics --- 

OPERATIONS & 

FLIGHT TEST 

FUNCTIONS: 

Operations Pla 

Test Plans 

Astronaut 

Training 

PERSONNEL: PERSONNEL: PERSONNEL: 

Assigned: Assigned: Assigned: 

from USAF from USAF from USAF 

Attached: 

from USAF 

NASA • N, 

_ ron OFFICIAL UCD ONLY 

Tv.tostk Roftc.. .4 Mr. cof
SIGNATURE

APPROVAL

commas

COORDINATION

INFORMATION 41n414:,..MMOMM

RNIVRN TO

FILE

Yuma

EMMET: l'Eth 3 

v mina. ° I ir

 A7,4 /4/44,24,1

ek

BY

YOUR CONNENTS/DIRECTION:

c) 0-9-11 aw4L-- &A.

lab e:o 1;rp/ A4 44-4,4,4„,,,

evult4i r

te4e.i 14s, 0,047.....

iscN L-4-4)10;n—;-,

117 'k4"1--7-

)1N L
COMM NO Internal

COPY OP COMO

--TOP-SECRET-

-Mt NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE. 81254161"121

WASHINGTON. D.C.

TH NRO STAFF January 26, 1973

NOTE FOR LT COLONEL HOFMANN

Gerry Burke called to elaborate on what he envisions

for Dr. McLucas' presentation to the PFIAB on the morning

of 1 February. He said that Dr. McLucas is being invited

as a friend and has the total and complete sympathy of the

PFIAB. Dr. Mamas should feel free to spend as much time

in discussion with the Board as he feels necessary.

Specifically, Gerry suggested that Dr. Mamas elaborate

on certain parts of the Taking Stock memo which describe

the developments, achievements and prospects for the NRO.

Gerry thinks that this should be a completely candid presentation. The Board will have had access to both the PFIAB

Report and the Taking Stock memo but probably none of the

individuals will have had time to digest the material.

Gerry thinks that Dr. McLucas should come out verbally

very strongly for an NSCID. He also thinks that Dr. McLucas

should describe the problems which have been generated by

outsiders in recent months which have impinged on the

management of the NRO. Be again said that the PFIAB is on

Dr. McLucas' team 100 percent.

I asked Gerry if Dr. Hall would be invited to attend.

He said yes but to another session, and the sympathies of the

PFIAB were not very strong for Dr. Hall.

Gerry does understand the restraints which Dr. Mamas

faces in being candid.

Gerry apologized for not being able to get in touch

with you and suggested that you or I or both of us plan to

visit with him sometime early next week prior to the PFIAB

meeting. (I would like to go with you.)
In terms of Dr. tkLucas' presentation I think that

he ought to go into the meeting and use the Taking Stock

memo plus the memo on the NRO structure and offer a completely

informal, more or less ad-lib, series of thoughts to the PFIAB.

This would appear to me to be more impressive that attempting

to simulate a formal briefing. I am sure that Gerry would

rather see this presentation_ be more or less informal and full

of discussion.

LD S. COYLE JR.

Major, USAF

i;

-TOP-SECRET--

Internal

COMOil CAM's
EXHIBIT (31.2)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302



I, Christopher F. Cranford, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of South Street Financial Corp.;
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Signed:

/s/ Christopher F. CranfordChristopher F. CranfordChief Financial Officer




Date: May 5, 2005
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1548

ROBERT LEE RANDOLPH, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LEE HARTER; CATHAY HUGHES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Orangeburg. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (5:18-cv-00689-TMC)

Submitted: July 26, 2018 Decided: July 30, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Lee Randolph, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Lee Randolph appeals the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

(2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Randolph v. Harter, 

No. 5:18-cv-00689-TMC (D.S.C. May 8, 2018). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
•:

NRO STAFF

--Tomfew- •

"(NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE multrafflusi WASHINGTON, D.C.

August 14, 1974

. - HANDLE VIA

} L

CONTROL SYSTEM

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

SUBJECT: Agriculture Department Study of Collection =III

Mi atte d meeting in •ffice along 111111 with nd

61111

111111 om the De artsent o riculture rom DIA and

r• o ce. Agriculture peop e are

= in tiating a rat r ailed requirements identification and

111111 implementation study. The h ckets and have had exMIR tensive discussions with, of OMB. Agriculture

111111 Department wants DOD's help in providing them an insight into

111111 reconnaissance satellite capabilities in order that our assets

111111 potentially could be of use to the Agriculture Department to

serve a variety of needs. 11E111

111111

i11111 After some discussion, stated that he felt

Eims it would be useful to the Defense Department if Agriculture

111111 did indeed have a strong requirement so that we could expand

!j m our photographic collection capability. I pointed out the

mom similarity between what Agriculture was attempting to do and

ammrs what the Interior Department desires along the same lines. I

mum' also pointed out some of the inherent problems associated with

11111 the current security structure and the mechanism for placing

ion requirements upon the NRO for collection. I also suggested

Ills that the Agriculture team contact Mr. Inlow for advice. The min Agriculture people said that they had worked with Dr. Steininger •

„Mil and his people in the past aware of the Reston facility

CD :womonm and the old ARGO Panel. agreed to provide same

KEE consulting support for the Agr culture task team.

NMI im

session and reiterated to him the problems inherent in such

CI NAM NA,, Ilo I

HANOI F VIA I •4•••• . NOW 41•44•. DILI MS0•C••••••

se411411.1# ItI I ,111131••vi /1•111• .104 i •

Ilan CAII1,110.0 • . Irli I U. • ft •

a.,111•1•11Cing 1 • Oa•VAIP*110%

l •e•••••• On ••

CONTROL SYSTEM -- OM; • .• 600. oak. . ••n •

-TOP-SECREfmonoiNoTCS-37583-

vor cows 7'

PAGE .1_.„ PAGES

Resources

I privately met with for a moment after the
an undertaking and suggested that the DCI organization would

be the ro er ace for the Agriculture people to focus on.

I told, of the meeting which General Graham chaired

with respect to the ERTS cost benefit study and explained that

a major national policy decision would be required with the

Agriculture study if it proceeds in any depth. I expect that

We will be called upon to provide some consulting services to

the Department of Agriculture people.

HAROLD S. COYLE, JR.

Lt Colonel, USAF

Deputy Director for

Plans and Policy

M n1%= .-1, . a

--TALENT-KEYHOLE

C0`."1401..

CosSIMMo in iNfll 1

I MINOT I•OvIVIII•114. OKI •1110•C•111•6

110401111 01 !ammo' PPM 1 .14/ IN

10%C• 111410.11, • .0 ,1 l li• a. M

411•10•1 Mt • IM:s•1140.4, s►

hasored• .. 11.•••••

n.01.n •n•• ••n••• one. 4-.

comm..0 TC§37581:24
Order entered December 20, 2012

In The 

## Court of appeato jfiftb 31.55tritt of TEexao at aftaizi fit No. 05-11-01527-CV DMC VALLEY RANCH, LLC, DMC FRISCO, L.L.C, ET AL, Appellant V. HPSC, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-07-14983



### ORDER On the Court's own motion, this case is REMOVED from submission on February 13, 2013 at 1:00 p.m. The case will be reset in due course.
/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG PRESIDING JUSTICE