alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Auditors

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-09349, Form S-3
No. 333-85923, Form S-3 No. 333-34574 and Form S-8 No. 333-42710) of AVAX Technologies, Inc. and
in the related Prospectuses of our report dated February 28, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of AVAX Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

|                                     |  |                      
|------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------
|                                     |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|Kansas City, Missouri
March 25, 2003 |  |                      

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03368]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: FEMA-2015-0008; OMB No. 1660-0030]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request; Manufactured Housing Operations Forms

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    On February 9, 2015, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 
published an agency information collection notice in the Federal 
Register at 80 FR 7005. In the For Further Information Contact section, 
FEMA inadvertently listed the email address for the Records Management 
Division as <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#581e1d15197511363e372a35392c313736751b3734343d3b2c3137362b753936393f3d353d362c183e3d3539763c302b763f372e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c187848c80ec88afa7aeb3aca0b5a8aeafec82aeadada4a2b5a8aeafb2eca0afa0a6a4aca4afb581a7a4aca0efa5a9b2efa6aeb7">[email protected]</span></a>. It 
should be <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2e686b636f03674048415c434f5a474140036d4142424b4d5a4741405d03634f404f494b434b405a6e484b434f004a465d00494158"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aaecefe7eb87e3c4ccc5d8c7cbdec3c5c487e9c5c6c6cfc9dec3c5c4d987e7cbc4cbcdcfc7cfc4deeacccfc7cb84cec2d984cdc5dc">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: February 11, 2015.
Charlene D. Myrthil,
Director, Records Management Division, Mission Support, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2015-03368 Filed 2-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Order entered November 29, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 17
- 00960
- CR
MARCOS EVANGELISTO E SCOBAR, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F17
- 00354
- W



### O RDER The reporter’s record is currently due December 1, 2017. Before the Court is court reporter Patricia Holt’s November 21 , 2017 request for additional time to f ile the reporter’s
record. We GRANT the request and ORDER the reporter’s record due on or before January 2,
201 8

. /s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
#### Wettengel, Respondent, vs. United States “Lloyds,” Appellant.

*May 5*—

May *21, 1914.*

*Insurance: Automobiles: Collision.*

Damage to an automobile caused by its running off tbe main road and’ down a bank into a river was not covered by a policy insuring against damage “by being in collision . . . with any-other automobile, vehicle or object, excluding . . . damage caused by striking any portion oí the roadbed.”

Appeal from a judgment of the municipal court of Outa-gamie county: Thomas H. Ryan, Judge.

*Reversed.*

Eor the appellant there was a brief by *Lines, Spooner, Ellis & Quarles,*and oral argument by *0. B. Quarles.*

Eor the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of *Julius P. Fronde.*

Timlin, J.

The respondent had from the appellant a policy of insurance against loss or damage by fire covering an automobile. This policy carried the following rider or slip attached:

> “In consideration of an additional premium of $36 this policy also covers, subject to its other conditions, damage to the automobile and equipment ... by being in collision during the period insured with any other automobile, vehicle or object, excluding . . . damage caused by striking any portion of the roadbed or by striking the rails or ties of street, steam or electric railroads,” etc.

The evidence showed without contradiction that during the period of insurance and on October 11, 1912, with consent of the respondent, this automobile was being used by an agent of the respondent for pleasure riding at night, and that this agent by accident ran the automobile off the main road and down a bank of three or four feet into the river, causing damage to the car. The municipal court found that the automobile was damaged in a - collision by being precipitated into the East river in the city of Green Bay.

*434This accident is so' obviously outside of the quoted stipulation of the policy that discussion seems superfluous. In. order to bring the case within the policy there must have been, first, a collision; second, the collision must have been with another automobile, vehicle, or somewhat similar object, *ejusdem generisj*and third, it must not have been with any portion of the roadbed, meaning the ground on which the machine was running or attempting to run. No such collision was shown as that insured against.

In *Harris v. American C. Co.*83 N. J. Law, 641, 85 Atl. 194, 44 L. R. A. n. s. 70, the policy was different. In this-court that decision has merely' advisory value, and we are disposed to doubt its soundness even upon the different contract there in question.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T SUSAN V . KLAT, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. MI T C HE L L R E P AI R I NF OR MAT I ON C OMP AN Y, L L C ; S NA P - ON I NC OR P OR AT E D, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 55717 D. C . No . 3 : 1 0 - c v - 0 0 1 0 0 - J M- C AB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J e f f r e yT . M i l l e r , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d June 10, 2013 ** B efo re: H A W K IN S , M cK E O W N , an dB E R Z O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. S u s a n V . K la t ap p e a ls p r o s e f r o m th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s s u m m a ryju d g m e n t in h e re m p lo y m e n t a c tio n a lle g in g r e ta lia to ryd is c h a r g e in v io la tio n o f T itle V I I . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o , V a s q u ezv . C o u n ty 

# FI LED JU N 17 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 55717 2 of L os A ng eles , 3 4 9 F. 3 d6 3 4 , 6 3 9 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 4 ) , a n dw e a f f i rm. T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r lyg r a n te ds u m m a ryju d g m e n t b e c au s e K la t f a ile dto r a is e ag e n u in e d is p u te o f m a te r ia l f

a c t a s to th e f

ir s t e le m e n t o f

h e rp r im af

a c ie ca se of re t al i at i on , thati s, w hether s he w as engaged i n a prot ec t ed ac t i vi ty und er T itle V I I a t th e tim e o f

h e rte rm in a tio n . Se e id. at64 6 (se tt i ng forth el em ent s of a pri m a f ac i e c as e of r et al i at i on un der T i t l e V II ); L e arne d v . B e l le v ue , 860 F . 2d 928, 93 2-33 (9th C i r. 19 88 ) ( t o survi ve sum m ary j ud gm ent , em pl oyee m ustra i se a tr i abl e di s put e tha t , a tthe t i m e of t e rm i na t i on, he r“ oppos i t i on” t o or

“ pa rt i c i pa t i on” i n c e rt a i n c onduc tw a s r e a s onabl ype r c e i ve d t o f a l l w i thi n the prot ec t i on of T i t l e V II ). T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng K l a t ’ s m ot i on f or di s qua l i f i c a t i on be c aus e K l a tf

a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h tha tthe j udge ’ s i m pa rt i a l i tym i ght r e a s o n ab lyb e q u e s tio n e d . Se e P es n e ll v . A r s e n a u lt , 54 3 F . 3d 10 38 , 10 43 (9th C i r. 2008) ( s e tt i ng f

orth s t a nda r d of

r e vi e w ove rdi s qua l i f

i c a t i on m ot i ons a nd gr ounds for r ec usal un der 28 U . S . C . §§ 14 4 and 45 5(a) ). K l a t ’ s c ont e nt i ons r e ga r di ng the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s a l l e ge d f a i l ur e t o r e vi e w the ent i re re cord are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.32    
  


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

CONSULTING AGREEMENT  


    This Amendment No. 1, dated March 29, 2001, amends a certain Consulting Agreement dated as of March 1, 1999 by and between Silicon
Image, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Deog-Kyoon Jeong
("Consultant") (the "Consulting Agreement"). 


    WHEREAS,
the "Period of Consultancy" specified in the Consulting Agreement is scheduled to expire, subject to the terms and conditions of the Consulting Agreement, on
October 31, 2002; 


    WHEREAS,
Consultant is eligible, pursuant to the Company's option repricing program, to exchange certain options granted to him for new options to be granted in April 2001 that
will be subject to vesting until April 2005 and is also eligible to be awarded additional equity compensation by the Company in the future; 


    WHEREAS,
the Company and Consultant accordingly desires to extend the period of consultancy under the Consulting Agreement and specify the consulting rate during such extension; 


    NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 



    1.  The
Consulting Agreement is hereby amended to replace the date "October 31, 2002" with the date "October 31, 2005" in Section 1.3 and in
Section 2 of Exhibit A. 


    2.  The
Consulting Agreement is hereby amended such that Section 3 of Exhibit A reads in its entirety as
follows: 




Monthly
Consulting Rate

$8,000 per month for March 1, 1999—December 31, 1999;

$9,000 per month for January 1, 2000—December 31, 2000;

$10,000 per month for January 1, 2001—December 31, 2001;

$11,000 per month for January 1, 2002—December 31, 2002;

$12,000 per month for January 1, 2003—December 31, 2003;

$13,000 per month for January 1, 2004—December 31, 2004;

$14,000 per month for January 1, 2005—October 31, 2005. 





    3.  Except
as amended by this Amendment No. 1, the terms of the Consulting Agreement remain in full force and effect. 



    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have executed this Amendment No. 1 (or have caused this Amendment No. 1 to be executed by their duly authorized
representatives) as of March 29, 2001. 



	Silicon Image, Inc.	 	 
	

By:	
 	

/s/ DAVID D. LEE   
 David D. Lee

President	
 	

/s/ DEOG-KYOON JEONG   
 Deog-Kyoon Jeong











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.32
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

+Si- NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

THE NRO STAFF 

September 18, 1970 

MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD 

SUBJECT: MOL Program Office Close Out 

The MOL Program Office in SAMSO comes to an official 

end on September 30. The original termination date of 

June 30 was extended by Dr. McLucas (as the Acting Secretary 

of the Air Force) to September 30, 1970. 

There are three people left in SAMSO in the MOL office, 

and one of these--Tom Rutter--is already in his new office 

under Colonel Eisemann. On September 16, I asked Tom to 

prepare a wrap-up report for us, as of the end of the month, 

so that we can tell the Secretary where we stand and what 

actions are still outstanding. About mid-November, we will 

be able to put together a more comprehensive report, as Tom 

has asked the contractors for more specifics by that date. 

Even though the office phases out September 30, Tom 

still has the job of completing final actions. This sometimes 

laSts for several years, but I don't know that it will for MOL. 

FREDERICK L. HOFMANN 

Major, USAF 

HANDLE VIA 

-"TerSTCREf-- 

EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

DOD DIRECTIVE 5200.10 DOE5 NOT APPLY 

CONTROL NO In 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL. SYSTEM 

COPY OF COPIES 

PAGEMor—r— PAGES
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AMERITRUCK
DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             906
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,837
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,253
<INVENTORY>                                      1,969
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,581
<PP&E>                                         159,431
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,083
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 266,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,447
<BONDS>                                        233,867
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,053
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                     (11,428)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   266,202
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               205,444
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  204,763
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   174
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,001
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (14,544)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (4,799)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (9,745)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (243)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (9,988)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1282 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1282

  To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to require the Secretary of 
Energy to consider the objective of improving the conversion, use, and 
 storage of carbon dioxide produced from fossil fuels in carrying out 
           research and development programs under that Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 11, 2015

  Mr. Manchin (for himself and Ms. Heitkamp) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to require the Secretary of 
Energy to consider the objective of improving the conversion, use, and 
 storage of carbon dioxide produced from fossil fuels in carrying out 
           research and development programs under that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FOSSIL ENERGY.

    Section 961(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 
16291(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(8) Improving the conversion, use, and storage of carbon 
        dioxide produced from fossil fuels.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 33 (Thursday, February 19, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03430]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[Docket No. EP 558 (Sub-No. 18)]


Railroad Cost of Capital--2014

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of decision instituting a proceeding to determine the 
railroad industry's 2014 cost of capital.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board is instituting a proceeding to determine the 
railroad industry's cost of capital for 2014. The decision solicits 
comments on the following issues: (1) The railroads' 2014 current cost 
of debt capital; (2) the railroads' 2014 current cost of preferred 
equity capital (if any); (3) the railroads' 2014 cost of common equity 
capital; and (4) the 2014 capital structure mix of the railroad 
industry on a market value basis. Comments should focus on the various 
cost of capital components listed above using the same methodology 
followed in Railroad Cost of Capital--2013, EP 558 (Sub-No. 17) (STB 
served July 31, 2014).

DATES: Notices of intent to participate are due by March 30, 2015. 
Statements of the railroads are due by April 20, 2015. Statements of 
other interested persons are due by May 11, 2015. Rebuttal statements 
by the railroads are due by June 1, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted either via the Board's e-filing 
system or in the traditional paper format. Any person using e-filing 
should comply with the instructions at the E-FILING link on the Board's 
Web site, at http://www.stb.dot.gov. Any person submitting a filing in 
the traditional paper format should send an original and 10 copies to: 
Surface Transportation Board, Attn: Docket No. EP 558 (Sub-No. 18), 395 
E Street SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pedro Ramirez at (202) 245-0333. 
Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at (800) 877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board's decision is posted on the 
Board's Web site, http://www.stb.dot.gov. Copies of the decision may be 
purchased by contacting the Board's Office of Public Assistance, 
Governmental Affairs, and Compliance at (202) 245-0238. Assistance for 
the hearing impaired is available through FIRS at (800) 877-8339.
    This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the 
human environment or the conservation of energy resources.

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 10704(a).

    Decided: February 11, 2015.

    By the Board, Acting Chairman Miller and Vice Chairman Begeman.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2015-03430 Filed 2-18-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
‘MUURBBERHLE

ce

cs

MEMORANDUM FOR THE SEGRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE
ATTENTION: Under Secretery Malcaim A, Maclatyre

SUBJECT: FY 2959 471, Program

Le reepanaa toryour memorandum of 27 Nevembar, subject xs
theve, and is secfirmanins of sur Feversl omvearsgtlans nv. the shove
subject, ie Secretary ef Defense and ARPA agrae ty ths ageiganen:
by the Aix Force of Project L7L ts the ARDC fcr the ret Severs!
yexs@ ead uso! Geox! sbjectives are Obthined, Ibis sien agresd that
the tartacve bento sarter, to ba estabiished at or feear Offutt Air
Fores Base at sone future date, wili be Oparéited by ARDC,

Noting your clmtio: of the many factors evolved, ARPATs
acing or requests for Sotom relating oy Project 27L will be
communicated through Headquarters, U, 8, Alr Force, to the
Deputy Chief of Sixff, Develapment, with copy to the Assistant
Secretary for Research and Development,

Tke other factors mentioned, including thesa relating to
fuxding and possible Teassigume:t or review of Certat: firing
achedules, bave heer, dascussed with you Separately, Upon
completion of the ReCessary review and Feudjustrmaant of the Program
26 required by fued aviliabiliry aad othe priority ARPA Projects,
wa wil commuricate with you further,

For your information, Ihave boday addressed to you azsthes
letter relating to the Procedures urd handizg of the DISCOVERY
teries of firtagy previously asaoziated, with Project U7L and now
withdrewn theratrom,

Roy W. Johnson
Director

cve
SPECIAL FILE

, $1
w ee NR: aes :
ee FOR Gtvsidl, USE ONLY eT,

RS IBF
EXHIBIT 11

                                    KSW, INC.

                         STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION
                        OF NET EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                 SIX MONTHS             SIX MONTHS       SIX MONTHS           SIX MONTHS
                                                   ENDED                  ENDED            ENDED                ENDED
                                                  6/30/98                6/30/97         6/30/98              6/30/97
                                             --------------          --------------     -------------        ------------
<S>                                          <C>                 <C>                <C>                  <C>
NET EARNINGS/(LOSS)                          $   (656,000)       $    514,000       $   (325,000)        $    14,000
                                             ==============      =============      =============        ============
EARNINGS/(LOSS) PER SHARE - PRIMARY
Weighted Average Shares outstanding
  during the period                             5,458,366           5,542,978          5,458,366           5,542,978
                                             ==============      =============      =============        ============
Earnings/(Loss) per Common Share
Primary                                             ($.12)       $        .09              ($.06)        $         0
                                             ==============      =============      =============        ============
EARNINGS/(LOSS) PER SHARE - DILUTED
Weighted Average Shares outstanding
  during the period                             5,458,366           5,542,978          5,458,366           5,542,978

Common and Common Stock equivalent
  shares using the treasury stock method          283,182             192,192            242,912             194,091
                                             --------------      -------------      -------------        ------------
Total Shares Outstanding for purposes of 
   calculating diluted earnings/(loss)          5,741,548           5,735,170          5,701,278           5,737,069
                                             ==============      =============      =============        ============
Earnings/(Loss) per Common and
  Common Equivalent Share - Diluted                 ($.12)              $.09               ($.06)                 $0
                                             ==============      =============      =============        ============
</TABLE>