UNCLASSIFIED

AFPR - LOCKHEED MISSILES & SPACE DIVISION

Sunnyvale, Calif ornia

HISTORICAL REPORT

1 July - 31 December 1959

tn•••••, +.0 (-6\►

.7.

".rte'. ..

...'

7....,

...o. t9,

I o.t1L

...

...

:...1

1")

r.

....
REPORTS CONTROL SYMBOL

L LOCATION

BOX 504— Sunnyvale, Calif.

4. NAME AND LOCATION OF NEXT HIGHER HEADQUARTERS

Sacramento Air Materiel Area

McClenan Air. Force Base

Sacramento, California

L ST

ATEMENT OF ISISSIONINOLN/OHNO.CHANGES(Centhousem sepeaDt• *Me° To accomplish the operational phases of contract adm the Armed Services Procurement Reg inistration as outlined in ulations and Air Force Procurement Instructions. Insure implementation of the Dept. of Defense

Industrial Security Program.

During the inriod covered by this of this AFPRO. report there were no changes in the mission

7. ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES INCLUDING REASONS FOR CHANGE (Continuo on 1. There were no organizational mipsna• ahom0

changes in the structure of the AFPRO; however,. minor changes occurred within the divisional imposed by an increased workload. elements to meet additional requirements

a. To provide for administration of Satellite Systems Contracts, an Adnin-

/

were assigned with

istrative Contracting Officer Coordinator and two Administrative individual respon Contracting sibilities for three. Officers was approved for a Senior Price Analyst (3) major proges:

and a Purchase Methods Analyst for/imprMeaning AMC Contract Pricing and to provide a continuous review of Contractor's purchasing

oving systems and p

ractices. (Part I, pares la and b, Annex)

-iiellebianimixy-ixadmia".42ant.T..„-Fara-ap—AzweAL

A Production Specialist was -assigeed to assist in hand] the workload of facilities' expansions in ing the Bay increasing

e

Area and at Vandenberg Air Force Base. (Part I, para 3a, Annex) See Continuation sheet

AN FORM 2AR

SEP SS

PAGE I OF 3 PAGES
A DIGNISTRATIVE PROGRESS AND PROBLEMS(Centinvoon **Pawn* M*14

With the exception of problems involving personnel recruitment, the admin- istrative phases of operation kept abreast of the development and growth of organization. this

Foremost among the p

in filling position roblems during this period was the difficulty experienced vacancies both in technical and (electronic engineer) existed administrative areas. One vacancy

during the entire period. Many applicants were inter- viewed but were found to be lacking in experience and background. clerical positions Stenographic and remained vacant because grade levels and

with those offered by local industry. (Part I, pare 2b and pay Annwere not commensurat,e

5, ex)

3. At this time plans were being formulated to restudy grade level structures

and where indicated to attain hi in an attempt to bring each position description into alignment with requirements;

gher grade levels.

malliONPROmuMSAWDMOWOM

As of June 1959, 47 

istration with a total value contracts were assigned to this AFPR for primary admin- of 4348,649,681; and on 31 December 1959, 56 contracts with a slig

htly-hIgher total face value were assigned. (Part II, par is Annex).

In November negotiations commenced for def ultimately-be divided initization on a contract which will

the Co into individual contracts for the Discoverer, Samos, Midas, and mmunication and Control programs. (Part II, Par lc, Annex)

The first Midas Satellite was accepted and shipped to Cape the usual interface existed. Several visits to Cape Canaveral by aCanaveral representa

for

tive of this office, and the 

satisfactory in alleviating the problem. (Part II, par 2a, annex)

indoctrination of the ANCTSO assigned to the Midas project proved

Seven Discoverer Vehidle sales were c VIII) were launched from VandenNm ompleted and four vehicles (V, VI, VII, mAir Farce Base. Although the launches were

successful no recoveries were made. The recovery impact area of Discoverer VIII (see continuation sheet)

PAGE a OF PAGES
PREP 0 BY

APPR. EDIT

AF.WP-0.af 11.2110

PAGE 3 OF 3 PAGES '

•

• CONTINUED (Continue on separate Mood

was missed by 200M6 but good detection by monitoring aircraft was achieved. (Part II, par 3a and b, Annex)

10. ADDITIONAL REQU1 _ 11T11 Venal., an sepaisto shoe° Al the WS 117I. Program encountered no serious production through final assembly, problems shortages of test equipment, critical components and manpower in Mbdification and Checkout continued to be a problem at year's end. (Part III, par 2a, Annex)

As the rate of production for the three basic programa increased, because of lack of sufficient test stand capacity at Santa Cruz-it would constitute a serious bottleneck during the ensuing year. (Partin, par 2b, Annex)

3. During November 1959, representatives of Sq. USAF, and, major AFPFtvisited Patrick Air Force Base, VS 11712 subcontracts and cognizant APD's in the eastern states to

discuss mutual problems and develop better methods for exchange of information and

correction of program deficiencies. (Part IV', par la, Annex)

t. LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS (C41,Nnu• on 041Pageho ANDO

A. GENERAL ORDERS 71071.4.—.

D. ORGANIZATION CHARTS

MISSION DIRECTIVES

VITAL STATISTICS 

E. ROSTER OF KEY PERSONNEL anon& paddan and dab assIened)
Paragraph 7 Organizational Changes Including Reasons For Change ( Cbutinued) d. This AYES was

Adndnistration for Prime

assigned Office of

Contract

placed with Philco in support of Communication and Control function for WS and spaces were allotted for the staff to administer the ing 117-I., contract. (Part II

of a sub-office at the Philco , par lh, plant Annex)
.SEMI-AMMAL HISTORICAL REPORT

AFPRO, Sunnyvale, California

ally 1959 - 31 December 1959 I AdminiStrative Progress and Problems:

1. (lisd)

Contraite ct Division

tration of Satell Systems

was 

C

reorganized to provide staffing or adminis- ontracts; an Administrative Contracting Officer Coordinator and two Administrative Contracting

rs with individual responsibility for the three ma or,Office

s.

Nanning was a

Analyst. Applicants s pproved for Senior Price Analyst and a Purchase Methods

elected for the positions reported for duty late in

December. The Senior Price Analyst was 

assigned. the responsibility Co direct

supervon and review-of all pricing with the aim of improving AMC Contract

P

ricing. The PUrdhase Methods Analyst assumed the 

Purchasing systems and pract

primary duty of continuouss

review of Contractor'S 

purices.

p. A Procurement Trainee Progra

de

SMANA and San anciscom. was established in conjunction with veloped for 12 months

Fr APD. Trainee was assigned to this AFPRO and a schedule qualifying trainee for ACO position.

training period at AFPR level with the 

ultimate aim of

2. (RSQ)

a. Several problems These occurred efforts which required concerted efforts to resolve.

involved travel and meetings with high

level APDffis and Al test

base personnel in connection with the Weapons System Manager 

concepts of procthe affected activities has been

urement under this type of program.

Considerable p this area, and a sound and broad understanding rogress has been made in

est of the various conceptt with ablished and accepted.

viz, one mechanical and two 

has existed during the p

electronic. Ond (1) macancy

without success. 

eriod.' EVery eff eer)

necess

Many a e to fill this vacancy

rr: terviewed bat were lacking background-to qualify them- in the

;0116..2,40.e.Lim.A. the po4troh; This is

(1 ) at Van Aim

c. Three (3) W/13 positions were converted to GS at Sunnyvale and one

3. (lisp)

a. An additional poiition, P

 ruction Specialist (General/Facilities)

was assigned this Division to assist in ng the increasing workload of

facilities' exp handli ansions in the Bay Area and at 

Vandenberg Air Fo

g

Base.
Cross training in all areas was implemented, and Standard Operating

procedures (i.e., ECP Procedure etc " ) were developed.

The problem of forecasting workload and manpower requirements at the Van Nuys facility became increasingly difficult, due to the phasing out

of the prime contracts the increasin g use of this facility for manufacturing "overload" by themeSunnyvale plant.

4. (i&)

a. The primary problem

complete understanding between this reporting period, has been the lack LMSD BMC and AFPRO of relative to the requirement for WDT Exhibit 57-7 on exist

,

ing letter contracts. When'the last negotiations were held, with regards to this 

e

xhibit, the Air Force, i.e., BMD, BMC, 

AFTR

and WM felt that

ment for 57-7 had been:considered and that TAD

would cont the require

inue to -perftxmanintenance 

analysis as they had on the -97 contract.

However, this has not been the case, as the 

Contractor has not performed this

function since NoveMber 1959. 

The redirected effort on the Individual programs' appears to be worded properly to provide a solution to this problem. 5. (ESE)

a. During p this period this office at for the cleri tempted to obtain grade of the positions. structures

A desk audit was conducted by SMAMA and a new as-3 positions. Position

re-written The ptsitionwith the

Description for the Industrial Security entical same position at RBE. Specialist was

b. The GS-3 (IA) PoSition DesCription was poorly written and no progress was made during this period.

SKUULalso refused to evaluate the Position Description 1

of the Industrial Security Specialist and the position remains a GS-9 at En

and a GS-10 at RBE. No progress.

6. (RSV)

a. In the period of 1 July 59 to 31 D

ecember 59, steps were taken to more aloselyalign staffing of the su

b-office to Contractor's programmed workload.

As a result the Contract Specialist (PA), GS-11, was 

transferrei to.another-AFM

As this position vas abolished, with duties being absorbed by other personnel. II. Mission Progress and Problems:

1.

1

O

a. As of 30

racts were assigned to this 1959

Jhne 1959, 47 cont

AFPR

prim 

56

ary adm

con o for

inistration with a ttal face value of $348, 649,681. Om 31 Dec ember

, tracts were a

ssigned having a total face value of $399,600,825.

-2-
December 1959.

The first WS 117E contract AF 044647)-97 was 99% completed in

Negotiations commenced in November for definitization of the follow- on contract, AF 044647)-347. This contract will then be divided into four

and Control programs.

individual contracts for the Discoverer, Samos, Midas and the Communication

Negotiations with Contractor on overhead rates resulted in overhead rate from $5.05 in early 1959 to a decreas e $4.35 in November 1959. (Ekhibit A)

(Exhibit B) Costly use of subcontracted engineering services was eliminated.

Discussions of the Military Audit and Contract 

Contractor's Administration Board

hiring of consultants. policy to limit the expenditure for

pro

Division personnel participated as team members in survey of LMSD procurement system during period 22 July to 10 November 1959.

h. This AFPR was assigned Office of Administration for Prime Contract

placed 

with Philo° in support of Comm tion from unication and Control function for WS 117L. normal geographical administration was made to provide close coord

integra

ination between

geographical

 Lockheed and EMC since this contract is an

of a sub- poffice

ert of the

the

WS 117Lprogram. Spaces were a l at Palm) lotted for the staffing Plant to administer the contract. (Exhibit C)

2. (RSQ)

a. 

The first MIDAS satellite was accepted and shipped to Cape Canaveral for launch; the usual interface problems existed. made several visits to the Cape The Chief of this Division

certain sec ondary assi to coordinate these matters and to

of the assignment inspection clarify req AMCTSO assigned to the MIDAS uirements. Mr. Claude Batts, AFQPR

project, made two visits to this facility for the p

urpose of indoctrination. Progress has been made in alleviating all prttaems to our mutual satisfaction.

The overall Quality Control Mission has progressed

.

The complete revision of AMCM 74-1, dated 1 September 1959, wassatisfactorily

received by this activity for implementation and progres The minima Local Surveillance Procedures has been made in _this

meats of the Manual have been issued. s required to establish the requireduring the ensuing period. Full implementation should be realized

A Cros

from 9 thru 13 November for s-Training Program on the WS 11 7L was developed and conducted

AF personnel assigned and AF test bases; in a maj ttendance were the *following:to or subcontractors

SMAMA.44SM Vandenber AFB

Gene VanDevort E.W. T.91tl!!AP. Cashmore, Male Inspector Walter S. Mbore, R.I. McPhail, bible Inspector ANCRAerojet

0

-3-
San Francisco APD

R.E. Gardner, Chief, QC

Fred W. 

C

Blocking, Chief, Electronics Br. lifford 0. Harris, AFQC Inspector, Philco

A!PR-BellAsft

Michael Cullinan, Chief, QC Div. Clifford. R. Warg, Aero P.P. Engineer

Rochester APD

James A. Clifford, Inspector

John R.Manzolati, Engineer

Aeft.

Joseph Cook, Aero P.P. Engineer

The Contractor's engineering personnel from each sub-system group, in addition

to engineering:personnel 

attached to the Division, lectured on the pertinent

sub-system a

and subsequent results, a better ssigned as their responsibility. Judging from comments received

understanding of the overall 

3. (RSP) program exists.

During the period 1 July 1959 through 31 December 1959, seven (7) each Discoverer Vehicles were sales 

completedl and, four (4) each Discoverer

Vehicles were launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base.

Vehicle No. 1029 (Discoverer V) was launched successfUlly on 13

August 1959 and achieved the predicted polar orbit, but recovery of the payload capsule was not successful. Vehicle 

No. 1028 (Discoverer VI) was launched on

19 August 1959 

was successfully with the same basic results. Vehicle No. 1051 (Discoverer VII) launched on 7 November 1959, but recovery of the payload was

not effected due to tumbling of the vehicle and non-initiation of the ejection

s

equence as a result of the failure of the 400 cycle power 

systemused by the

attitude c

ontrol system and the D-timer. Vehicle 

NO. 1050 (Discoverer VIII)

was launched on 20 Nbvember 1959 but the satellite engine was not cut off by the integrator at the desired velocity which 

r

esulted in a terminal velocity

Boo FES greater than desired, producing an apogee of 918 NM in lieu of the predicted 380 BM. The r

ecovery impact area was missed by 200 BM, but good detection by monitoring aircraft was achieved. No recovery was made.

c. The first Midas Vehicle No. 1008 (MIDAS 

date of 26 F

I) was sales completed and ebruary 1960.

delivered via MATS to the AMR on 

3 December 1959, to meet a scheduled launch

1.. (RSL)

a, Considerable progress has been made in the area of repair of repairables, both Con

tractor, Vendor and Subcontractor furnished equipment. 

This is

also true of Government furnished 

property area in that Lathes now started furnishing support to some of the GPO-TIA 

equipment. The Contractor is in

process of furnishing a complete listing of GIPP plus scheduled maintenance time

by q

uarter; this will enable the LSM to 

p

rovide more support to some of the 

b. It now ap GFP. pears that WDT E

xhibit 58-10, Reliability Program for Ballistic Missile and. Space Systems, is working smoothly. The LSMhas worked out

the coding and. EDP problems, and the punched data cards are going from the

Co

ntractor to the LM each week. No further 

problems are anticipated.
c. Some progress has been toted in written the en by the Logistics Department. number of Practice Procedures However, they are still this area and every effort is being exerted to force the delinquent in

Contractor to define

in detail the exact procedures the Logistic

rtmenow plus

the functional tie-ins of the other departm Depa t should fallow ents.

d•.The addition of Philco as an associate contractor has, to date,

had no impact on this office from a manpower standpoint; h

owever, with the

addition of Logistic exhibits to their let ter contract, some manpower will

have to be expended at Philo°.

e. The transceiver

placed in operation on 30

iver network was

status information. March 19

It is being utilized for the transmision of requisitions, follow-ups and60. No problems are s e anticipated.

5. (BSE)

a. The LMSD Security program was evaluated from Unsatisfactory to Satisfactory daring this period The . Industrial Security/412284er was replaced,

possibly due to inadequate management. The LMSD Security program was improved

as deficiencies were brought to their attention.

Lack of adequate classification

guidance to the LMSD employee was a major security problem

o causing both over

and underr classi ber fication. LMSD during this period grew in employee, area

ccupied num of classified contracts of extreme sensitivity to the National

Defense. This 

office also assumed security 

cognizance of mu contract and the

number of facilities under our cognizance 

increased from 6 to 8. of 409 perer month to This office LMSD .

received an average of 431 requests per month for clearance and

its

an average 6. (RSV)

a. Contract AF33(600)-38505

Fabrication of the 15 

made booster airframes required b on 4 November 1959•

y Negotiated

Contract AF33(600)-38505 dated 20 Apr 59 has been completed. Final delivery was

As of 30 June 59, eleven (11) of the required 24 flights had been accomplished. During this reporting 

period, nine (9) more flights were

accomplished (Flight #115 thru #123). Afterthe_19th_aight (Plight4L22)

conducted 23 'October 1959, difficulties were encountered as a result of booster

failures. Flight scheduling was held in abeyance until all rockets that were

supplied by Aerojet General, the designated subcontractor, could be 

examined

for possible malfhnctions. Bepeesentatives of the Lockheed Missiles & Space

Division met with Aerojet personnel to discuss possible fixes. Following the

conferences among AF , LMSDnda Aerojet per

Chemical Corporation would replace Aerojet General as the sonnel, it was decided that Thiokol

supplier of rockets

for the remaining flights under this 

program .

(3) Flight #123 

flown during this reporting 

period on 10 December lslherojet rockets.

1959,

f

9, 

c ig onst with g

t

ituted the 20th flight under the 1959 flight program and was the

-5-
BO difficulties were en relative Item to the Cont countered in this reporting ractor's submission of those reports period

required under of subject contract.

t

No. $; or the delivery schedules as set forth in Appendix A

As of this reporting period ending 31 December 1959, the

overall X-7a 93.6% complete.

Contract AF33(600)-34961

(1) Disposition of all government property under this contract has

been accomplished and a request for a final 

property audit has been submitted. Camvair Contract AF33(600)-375321 P.O. 291 (ALBM)

(1) With the publication of the Final Engineering Report 

(Lmsp/

9 

ubstantive

12820 date d re29 With

1959) c

q overing Alai Vehicle S/N 0206-4, all of the uirements of P.O. 291 were met. eft

is

preparing Ttrmination Inventory Schedules adequate for disposal 

purposes of

final invoicing

all residual property re and overhead adj maining under this P.O. and negotiating ustments in a

ccordance with the terms of the P.O.

Contracts AF04(645)-70 AF33(600)-275910 -29268 and -28692 (1) All substantive requirements of subject contracts have been

satisfied. Contractor is still in the process of effecting government disposition and negotiating in the final invoicing and overhead ad:ust property

C ments. ontract AF 87 (Facility)

(1) P

triodic Tool Utilization Surveys were 

conducted at the Van Nuys

facilityunder subject contract during this reporting period and resulted in

the declaration of idle, excess and/or o

bsolete machine tools for disposition. Purpose of s

urveys is to assure that Contractor's inventory

onl contains y those

items which will produce the =Ain= return for the se

f.

Air Force investment.

Master Bailment Agreement AF33(600)-65

(1) Bailment eements AP 3 277 -2380 and -

a request for a f

600 -2

2708. si

of all government property under these bailment 

agreements has been accD oispo

mplished

tion and

inal property audlt-hab-beei submitted.

Action was taken during this

reporti (2) Bailment eement AF3 600 -28 O. ng period to obtain Administrative Amendments 

covering those items desired for retention from subject Bailment Agreement by transfer to Bailment

Agreement AF33(600 )-3338- The remaining items on AF33(600)-2850 were 

amendments will be processed requested which

through AMC Plant Clearance screening. 

Upon'disposition of property, Agreement. necessary Request for final prop will complete action under this Ihilment erty audit will then be submitted.
(3) Bailment Agreement AP33( 00 eement AP33 on the bailed air -33 vas received

AP33(600)-38505. craft and citing the

III. Additional Requirements:

1 (RSQ)

The Quality Control Program of the been assigned. Contractor has shovn decided

improvement, particularly at test bases to which well QueliYied managers have

of residents established at majtors.

The vendor QC organization has

 subcontracexpanded considerably, with a number

c. The Calibration Program is very well established at the Bay Area the Navy alilding adjacent to LMSD.

facilities with Rill use of the secondary standard laboratory 

established in 2 (RSP)

Although the WS 117L program 

encountered no serious production p

through final assembly, shortages of test 

epipunit, critical components androblems

manp

ower in Nbdification and Check-Oat 

cont

inued to be a roblem at year's end. As the rate of p

prod

ution for the three basic programs 

increased, it

became apparent that c

during 

immediate fhture. use year 1960, lack of sufficient test stand

cap

acity at Santa Cruz Test Rase would 

constitute a serious bottleneck in the 3 (RSV)

a. X-7A Proposal. A firm CPPP Price Proposal for a 5-flight program

was forwarded to BORARC, WSPO on 8 

Decemb er 1959 by the contractor. WSPO indicated that the contractor proposed 

programvtuld be re-evaluated 

sometime /V. Miscellaneous:

in ;unary 1960 in order to determine the status of a 

p

rogram for fUture flights.

1 (ASP)

a. During November 1959, the AFAR, Production, 

Contracts and Quality

Control Chiefs visited Patrick APB, 

Bq D

EW', the major WS 117L subcontracts

and the cognizant Apes 

in the eastern states for the 

p

urpose of discussing

mutual prttlems and developing better 

methods for the exchange of information

and the corr

ection of program deficiencies.

b. The Production Division bad ditfic

ultydue to the limited nempower

available to it. This situation loss complicated by the requirement toof

-7-

600 -3338. A newly executed from Rq AMC exte Bailment nding the p

appropriate prime contract eriod of loan

usage under

o

t
in lengthy logistic courses 

which further. d

epleted our manpower resources. The manpower build-up 

programmed for am during 1960 , gave further indication

that the workload for this Di

vision will expand beyond our present limited capabilities.

2. (RSV)

a. A recommendation for a

 Sustained Superior Performance Rating for

W. Gilbert W. Andre, Production and Property Specialist, as-90 for the

period Icy - Novetber 1959 was prepared and submitted through the coordinated

effort of the Production and Contract Divisions and the Van ivy Sub-Office.

-8-
PN In In In

1 11;

IA 

i tt 

.., . ., f 4 a . 8 f

17 1 .., ..,

N . Is NNNOI N N N N

g .i ./ 1 s

I ; , 4 4,m)

Illittltiiii

VI S • & k

g: t 

! s sli

J41)1110

3 11.11 ..1 11111)111 II

'l ig 4g4g4gg -.:141A41

1 N N N g 2 2

o

2

-;11111 1 1/1/ twilillis01111 A 1 Pol:1 IPTiV5X1:11 f

A A

"

I 1

g
ROT V. GUSTAFSON

Colonel, USAF

Air 'Force Plant Representative

CHANGE

AFPR 01 205-7A

AIR FORCE PLANT NATIVE

LOCKHEED MISSILES & SPACE DIVISION

AFPR OFFICE INSTRUCTION) SUNNYVALE, CALIFORNIA

205-7A) 27 OCTOBER 1959

SECURITY

Deily Security Inspection of AFPRO

AFPR OI 205-7, 22 July 1959, is changed as follows:

3. PROCEDURES.

c.

 1

5) Production Division

6) Logistics Division

1 week.

1 week

d. Divisidn Chiefs will instruct their safe custodians and alternate custodians that all classified material will be properly stored and all safes locked

not later than 1620 hours daily. In event checker is not available When AFPRO

personnel are working after hours or on holidays the LM&SD Guard Captain,. Building

104, extension 28361, will be requested to act as an aiternite checker after the

closing of a safe containing classified material.

DISTRIBUTION: C
SMRSE

Page 1 of 2

AIR FORCE PLANT REPRESENTATIVE

AFPR OFFICE INSTRUCTION) LOCKHEED MISSILES & SPACE DIVISION

NR SUNNYVALE, CALIFORNIA 205-7) 22 July 1959

SECURITY

Daily Security Inspection of AFPRO

WHAT THIS INSTRUCTION DOES. Implements the prescribing resp

provisions of 5-1 by onsibility within the AFPRO for daily security inspectio AFR

ns

20

entire AFPR office. of the

TO WHOM THIS INSTRUCTION APPLIES. To all employees of the AFPRO.

3. P

ROCEDURES. Each Division Chief will appoint a security checker and an

alternate security checker during the periods indicated below who will be respon- sible for the following:

a. At the close of each work shift, regardless of whether or not a safe

has been opened, the security checker or his alternate will:

Inspect the entire AFPRO prior to his departure to insure that classified material has been properly stored, that all safes are locked and that

all exterior AFPR office doors, the mail room and library doors are locked. Tops

of desks and cabinets will be checked for classified material.

Chief of the Division concerned.

Report any irregularities or instances of noncompliance to the

b. In event the checker or his alternate is not available, the Division Chief will assume the responsibility of checking the entire office.

c. The resp

f onsibility for each Division will be in accordance with the

ollowing schedule which will commence with the week beginning 27 July 1959:

Contract Division

Quality Control Division

Security Division

Services Division

Production Division

Logistics Division

2 weeks

2 weeks

1 week

1 week

3 days

2 days

The Division Chiefs will furnish the Security Division a listing of checkers and alternates prior to the time listed above.
ROY W. GUSTAFSON

Colonel, USAF

Air Force Plant Representative

AFPR OI 205-8

Page 2 of 2

Division Chiefs will instruct their safe custodians and alternate

custodians that all classified material will be 

locked not later than 1620 hours daily. properly stored and all safes

If a violation is discovered after the departure of the 

custodian, a report of violation will be furnished to the AFPR. responsible

DISTRIBUTION:
CORRECTED COPY

(AFPROI Number)

AFPR OFFICE INSTRUCTION)

NR 84-1)

SMRSP

AIR FORCE PLANT REPRESENTATIVE

LOCKHEED MISSILES & SPACE DIVISION

SUNNYVALE, CALIFORNIA

22 JULY 1959

PRODUCTION

ECP Control Procedures

WHAT THIS INSTRUCTION DOES. Establishes a procedure for the 

filing and control of processing, Engineering Change Proposals.

TO WHOM THIS INSTRUCTION APPLIES. Personnel of the Production, Contract,

Quality Control and Logistics Divisions.

3. RESPONSIBILITIES:

a. The Production Division will:

Receive all Engineering Change Proposals, and correspondence

relating thereto, for review and evaluation.

Coordinate all Engineering Change Proposals with the Contract, Quality Control and Logistics Divisions to obtain their comments and recommenda- tions as applicable.

Forward formal Engineering Change Proposals, with consolidated AFPRO comments and reccamendations, to INC for approval within five (5) working days following the receipt of the ECP.

Maintain a complete ECP file containing all proposals and

correspondence relative to Engineering Changes and actions resulting therefrom.

b. The Contract, Quality Control and Logistics Divisions will:

Review all Engineering Change Proposals and submit on Disposition Form, any comments and/or reccumendations deemed pertinent, to the

Production Division within two (2) working days following the receipt of the ECP.

Forward copies of all CCN actions, approvals, disapprovals,

and all other data relative to ECPs to the Production 

and filing. Division for coordination

ROY W. GUSTAFSON

Colonel, USAF

Air Force Plant Representative

DISTRIBUTION: A and D
ROY W. GUSTA SCN

Colonel, USAF

Air Force Plant Representative

*MSC

AIR FORCE PLANT REPRESENTATIVE

LO AFPR OFFICE INSTRUCTION) CKHEED MISSILES & SPACE DIVISION

NR 70-3) SUNNYVALE, CALIFORNIA

13 CCTOBER 1959

PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING

Subcontract Procurement Review Committee

WHAT THIS INSTRUCTION DOES : Subcontract Establishes and defines the Procurement Review Committee. functions of the

TO WHOM THIS INSTRUCTION APPLIES: Contract, and Logistics Division personnel. Production, Quality Control

3. RUM: Contracting Officers have approving certain types of the responsibility

subcontract procurement in accordan 

of

ce with the t

reviewing and

terms and ade conditions of the prime contract. In order to insure that the best decision

certain

is m concerning large subcontract procurements, it is deemed necessary that personnel of the AFPR staff participate, as Review Committee, in reviewing and members of the Procurement rec proval or disapproval of anmending to the Contracting Officers ap- all subcontract pr all amendments of $100,000.00 or over to ocurements $500,000.00 or over and on

any subcontract.

4. PROCEDURES:

a. A committee to review the p

of Price Analysis as the rocurement shall be composed of (1) Chief chairman, (2) prime c an ACO (other than the ACO assigned to the ontract), (3) ACO assigned to the prime contract and directly assigned to the subcontract (4) the Price Analyst analysis function. will be in attendance. The c A recorder (non-voting)

c ally review ommittee will meet upon call of the chairman and will the submission procurement with p of the Contractor, inquire into all phases articular emphasis on selection of analysis, subcontractor, price

the

lysis, and negotiation memorandum of the prime contractor.

A written memorandum of the committee's action and the ACO will be maintained on each p

recommendation to rocurement in the subcontract file to which it pertains.

The Contract Division will inform QC, Production, and Logistics Divireceived

by. memorandum as soon as new procurements or significant emendmente thereto are ceived and the file will be available for inspection in the Contract Division..

DISTRIBUTION: A

*This Office Instruction supersedes AFPR OI Nr 70-3 27 Feb 1959
AFPR OFFICE INSTRUCTION)

40-11)

SMRSA

Page 1 of 2

AIR FORCE PLANT REPRESENTATIVE

LOCKHEED MISSILES & SPACE DIVISION

SUNNYVALE, CALIFORNIA

17 JUNE 1959

CIVILIAN PERSONNEL

Time and Attendance Reporting

WHAT THIS INSTRUCTION DOES: Provides uniform of time and attendance of civilian procedure for the reco personnel. riling

TO WHOM THIS INSTRUCTION APPLIES: sponsible for t To all super visors and alternates imekeeping functions and certification of attendance repo

tern

rts.

reRESPONSIBILITY: Certification of an at for the expenditure of g tendance report is authorization overnment fUnds. This responsibility will be at supervis- ory level where there is personal knowledge of the fact to e certi Certi- fication of attendance reports will be coupled with the

s

 authorit

b

y 

to fied.

disapprove leave requests. approve or

GENERAL:

The supervisor responsible for certifying attendance reports may assign to a s

ubordinate the details of checking daily a Form 594-1, Organizational Time and Attendance Repo ttendance and posting to DD

rt.

Division Division Chiefs will designate in writ ion (using DD ;

ng Form 96) the names of to the Chief, Services s for c upervisors and alternates responsible ertifying attendance reports and the names of who will perform the details of checking and subordinates and alternates

posting to the DD Forms 594-1.

Attendance and absence will be entered daily for each work shift. Verification of attendance will be 

telephone contact. accomplished by personal observation or by

Presence in a work status for a regularly 

will be indicated by posting actual time scheduled eight hour day in and full day of attendance is time out. Any block for which a

work, n not indicated requires posting of the actual hours of umber of hours leave taken and the type of leave to be charged.
AFPR OI 40-11

Page 2 of 2

e. Each attendance report, when certified for regular and overtime work by the properly designated person, will be forwarded together with the

completed time cards, to the Chief, Services Division, as 

possible upon completion of a expeditiously as pay period..

DISTRIBUTICE: A

ROY W. GUSTAFSON

Colonel, USAF

Air litate Plant Representative

2
SMRSA

AIR FORCE PLANT REPRESENTATIVE

LOCKNEED AFPR OFFICE INSTRLVTICII) MLSSILES SYSTEMS DIVISION

I 40-4) SUNNTVALE, maromm

9 SEPTEMBER 1958

CIVILIAN PERSONNEL

Normal Duty Boors

WHAT THIS INSTRUCTION Dams. Establishes a normal tour of duty.

TO WHOM THIS INSTRUCTION APPLIES. All personnel 

field activities. assigned to the AFPRO and

3. POLICY:

The normal tour of duty will be eight hours per day, five days per week from o800 hours to 1630 hours, Monday through Friday. This includes a lunch period of thirty minutes which will be arranged at the discretion of the Division Chiefs.

Rest periods will be granted to all p p ersonnel, but will be considered as rivileges and treated as such in accordance with MAWR 40-9. Rest periods

be ten minutes between the beginning of the shift and the lunch period and. ten minut will

between the lunch period and the end of the shift. es

ironediately after cawing to work, inmediately prior to Rest periods stay not be granted

tension to the lunch period. leaving work, or as an ex4. RESPONSIBILITIES:

Chiefs of Divisions will insure that lunch riods and rest periods are staggered to the extent that personnel will be available periods ations. at all times to cover operIn the event priority work prevents lunch from being taken at t

times, Division Chiefs will insure that personnel working through espeablithed

will be relieved at a later time. the lunch period

5. ElCEPTIONS TO NORMAL TOUR:

EXceptions to normal tour of duty may be authorized 

absolutely necessary, as in Quality Control, where it maybe necess the c by AFPR when

swing shift operations in order to assist the Contractor. necessary to over

Report of employees involved in other than normal tour of duty (excluding overtime) must be outwitted, in writing to Chief, Services Division in

advance of these changes.

ROY • GUSTAFSON

Colonel, USAF

Air Force Plant Representative

DISTRIBUTION: A, B, and C
•

SMRSA

Page 1 of 3

AIR FORCE PLANT REPRESENTATIVE

LOCKHEED MISSILES AND SPACE DIVISION AFPR OFFICE INSTRUCTION)

NR 11-2) SUNNYVALE, CLIFORNIA

21 AUGUST 195A9

AEMINISTRATIVE PRACTICES

P

reparation and Signature of Official Correspondence

WHAT THIS INSTRUCTION DOES: This 

cedures and authorization for 

instruction prescribes policy, p preparing and signing official (Military and Contractor) o correspondencero- riginating within the APPRO.

RESPONSIBILITY:

blocks, a. Division Chiefs are authorized to release, over their own signature correspondence concerning normal routine operational

counter- parts in SMAMA• Authority line (FOR THE AIR FORCE PLANT REPRESENTA

natters to

used on all correspondence tr TIVE) will be ansmitted outside the AFPRO to SMAMA units. Divis- ion Chiefs may redelegate this authority to other personnel but such redelaga- Um), must be in writing.

Example: FOR THE AF PLANT REPRESENTATIVE:

G. H. WEAVER

Chief, Production Division

b. An Administrative C

tive, is authorized ontracting Officer, or his designated representa- to sign over his own signature block corre ing to contract matters falling within the scope of his warrant.spondence pertainExample: (No command line)

ELMO E. HADEN

Contracting Officer

c. She Industrial Property tive, is authorized to sign over his 

Administrator, or his designatedown-signature block correspondence pertainpresenta

warrant or delegation.

ing to p

roperty and industrial equipment matters falling within the scope of his

Example: (No command line)

J. F. ROUNSAVELL

Industrial Property Adminiétrator
AFPR OI 11-2

Page 2 of 3

outside of SMAMA will be 

d. Correspondence to higher headquarters or any military organization

authority line (FOR 

prepared with the signature block of the AFPR and the THE COMMANDER) will be used. Division Chiefs are authorized to sign for the AFPR on routine cor ion p respondence. Such authority to other divisersonnel must be at the discretion of the Division Chief and in writing.

Reading and file copies will be initialed over the signature dual signing the co block by the indivi- rrespondence and the filing information 

by the originator. block will be completed

Example: FOR TEE COMMANDER

/s/ R. J. Garcia

for: ROY W. GUSTAFSON

Colonel, USAF

AF Plant Representative

e. Letters to the Contractor will be prepared in AF letter format except the address element will be complete. No command line will be used. The

signature block of the AFPR will be used except on letters specified in paragraph 2b and c above. Division Chiefs are authorized to sign for the AFPR on routine correspondence to the Contractor.

Example: (No command line)

/s/ Lyle J. Dunwoody, Jr.

for: ROY W. GUSTAFSON

Colonel, USAF

AF Plant Representative

C

orrespondence from or to the Contractor is routed through the

AFPRO. In order to expedite the communication, the AFPR stamp indorsement is

placed thereon. If it is necessary to reply to the Contractor, new 

pondence will be initiated. The Contractor's corresdesired. communication maybe inclosed if

All teletypes (classified or unc the sig lassified) will be prepared with

nature block of the AFPR, The ATM, Deputy AFPR, or Chiefs of have a Divisions uthority to release teletypes by signing mar the AFPR's signature block.

h. All other correspondence-includingteletypes stance, will, in every inDe

ce, be prepared for the signature of the AFPR and will be signed by the AFPR putyAFFR. Especially included in this re

pertaining to matters which quirement is correspondence

of accomp

involve significant changes in procedures or methods

the p

lishing the AFPRO mission; correspondence involving interpretation of olicies or views of the AFPR or which has the effect of establishing or

changing AFPRO policy. This also includes co irregularities, rrespondence pertaining to major controversial issues, or which expresses criticimm or dissatis- faction with an organization or individual; which affect AFPRO Workload; and 

correspondence at m

correspondence pertaining to

rel 

req

ive to

uests for courtesy assistance in connection with matters which do not fall within the

scope of AFPRO responsibility.

2
AFPR OI 11-2

Page 3 of 3

i. Correspondence will be thoroughly coordinated to the extent required

by the subject matter. Coordination will be indicated on the left hand margin of

the FILE copy of the communication. Office symbols will be listed in the sequence the originator desires coordination, with the o Coo riginator's symbol showing last.

rdination will be indicated by writing the last name or initials and date coordination was effected beside the office symbols. Correspondence will, not be signed and forwarded until the necessary coordination has been completed.

ROY GUSTAFSON

Colonel, USAF

tiC4

AF Plant Representative

'W. 

DISTRIBUTION:
ROSTER OF XEf PERSONNEL

As of 31 December 1959

Date Assigned

AFPR

July 1958

DAFPR

arch:LIM

Chief, Contract Division iinC195r.

Adm. Contract Officer July 1958

June 1956

Ind Prop Adm.

V. 1956

Chief, Production Division OCtober 1958

Chief, .Security Division Mhrch 1958 .

Chief, Q C & R Division April 1958

Chief, Services Division April 1957

Mechanical Engineer

June 1958

Chief, Logistics Division November 1958

Colonel Roy W. Gustafson

Major Harold R. Meadows

Elmo Haden

F. C. Smith

Joslin A. Garver

J. Fred Rounsarel

Graydon Weaver

Lyle j. Dunwoody Jr.

John S. Chamberlin

Susan McLachlin

David Meeker

Raymond Garcia