alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1354 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1354

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for the 
 recognition of attending physician assistants as attending physicians 
           to serve hospice patients, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 14, 2015

 Mr. Enzi (for himself and Mr. Carper) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for the 
 recognition of attending physician assistants as attending physicians 
           to serve hospice patients, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Patient Access to Hospice 
Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. RECOGNITION OF ATTENDING PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS AS ATTENDING 
              PHYSICIANS TO SERVE HOSPICE PATIENTS.

    (a) Recognition of Attending Physician Assistants as Attending 
Physicians To Serve Hospice Patients.--
            (1) In general.--Section 1861(dd)(3)(B) of the Social 
        Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(dd)(3)(B)) is amended--
                    (A) by striking ``or nurse'' and inserting ``, the 
                nurse''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``, or the physician assistant (as 
                defined in such subsection)'' after ``subsection 
                (aa)(5))''.
            (2) Clarification of hospice role of physician 
        assistants.--Section 1814(a)(7)(A)(i)(I) of the Social Security 
        Act (42 U.S.C. 1395f(a)(7)(A)(i)(I)) is amended by inserting 
        ``or a physician assistant'' after ``a nurse practitioner''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to items and services furnished on or after January 1, 2016.
                                 <all>
```
#### Rosenberg and another, Respondents, vs. McGinn, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Earl H. Jacobs,*attorney, and *T. P. Silverwood*of counsel, both of Green Bay.

For the respondents: *Kittell, Jaseph, Young & Everson,*attorneys, and *Lynn D. Jaseph*of counsel, all of Green Bay.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.18


  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                   MEMORANDUM

TO:     Ron Posner                                CC:

FROM:   David Hirschhorn

DATE:   February 28, 1997

RE:     Employee Agreement

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

As per our conversation and your e-mail, I understand our agreement as follows:

o       Compensation
        = Option to purchase 1.0 million shares upon execution of formal
          employee contract with an exercise price of $2.00 (as determined by a
          $0.125 premium over the closing bid price of $1.875 on February 21,
          1997)

        = Additional option to purchase 1.5 million shares with exercise prices
          of $2.00 (as determined by a $0.125 premium over the closing bid price
          of $1.875 on February 21, 1997).  Vesting as follows:

                a) 200,000 1 year from date of employee contract
                b) 300,000 2 years from date of employee contract
                c) 450,000 3 years from date of employee contract
                d) 550,000 4 years from date of employee contract

        = Annual salary as follows:

                a) Year 1: $180,000
                b) Year 2: $250,000*
                c) Year 3: $300,000*
                * assumes Company operates profitably for 2 trailing quarters,
                  if Company is not profitable then annual salary will be
                  $180,000

o       Severance Provisions
        = 18 months of current salary
o       Change of control
        = in the event of change of control at the Company (i.e. 50.1% of the
          voting stock or control of the Board of Directors goes to an
          unaffiliated entity) all options shall vest immediately
o       Other issues
        = shall receive all customary benefits (i.e. medical coverage, expense
          allowance, etc.)
        = title shall be Co-Chairman* and Chief Executive Officer
        * pending necessary shareholder approval at first available voting 
          opportunity
        = Art Schneiderman at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati will prepare the
          formal employee contract.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 68500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27295]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8520]

In the Matter of the Designation of Boko Haram Also Known as 
Nigerian Taliban Also Known as Jama'atu Ahlus-Sunnah Lidda'Awati Wal 
Jihad Also Known as Jama'atu Ahlis Sunna Lidda'awati wal-Jihad Also 
Known as People Committed to the Prophet's Teachings for Propagation 
and Jihad Also Known as Sunni Group for Preaching and Jihad as a 
Specially Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of 
Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the entity known as Boko Haram, also 
known as Nigerian Taliban, also known as Jama'atu Ahlus-Sunnah 
Lidda'Awati Wal Jihad, also known as Jama'atu Ahlis Sunna Lidda'awati 
wal-Jihad, also known as People Committed to the Prophet's Teachings 
for Propagation and Jihad, also known as Sunni Group for Preaching and 
Jihad, committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of 
terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national 
security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: November 5, 2013.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-27295 Filed 11-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
KFS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0380

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MARY DARLEAN WRIGHT,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including March 25, 2023, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response 

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

February 9 2023

02/09/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0380
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of Almaden Minerals Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:   June 27, 2003

/s/ Duane Poliquin



Name:  James Duane Poliquin

Title:    President and Chief Executive Officer





Date:   June 27, 2003

/s/Dione Bitzer

Name:  Dione Bitzer

Title:    Chief Financial Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 20-F or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 13.1
                                                                    ------------



               ASIA SATELLITE TELECOMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS LIMITED

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Asia Satellite Telecommunications Holdings Limited (the
"Company") Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Peter Jackson, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

June 29, 2004


                                            /s/ Peter Jackson
                                            -----------------------
                                            Peter Jackson
                                            Chief Executive Officer
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1146 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to prohibit 

further reductions in sodium levels and to reinstate the grain-rich requirements applicable to the national school lunch and breakfast programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 30, 2015 

Mr. HOEVEN (for himself, Mr. KING, Mr. COTTON, Mr. BOOZMAN, and Mr. 

RISCH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 

Act to prohibit further reductions in sodium levels and 

to reinstate the grain-rich requirements applicable to the 

national school lunch and breakfast programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Healthy School Meals 

5 Flexibility Act’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1146 IS

1 SEC. 2. SODIUM TARGET LEVELS; WHOLE GRAIN REQUIRE2 MENT. 

3 Section 9(f) of the Richard B. Russell National 

4 School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1758(f)) is amended by add5 ing at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(5) SODIUM TARGET LEVELS.—Notwith7 standing any other provision of law, the Secretary 

8 shall not implement any regulation under this Act, 

9 the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1771 et 

10 seq.), the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 

11 (Public Law 111–296), or any other law that would 

12 require a reduction in the quantity of sodium con13 tained in federally reimbursed meals, foods, and 

14 snacks sold in schools below Target 1 (as described 

15 in section 220.8(f)(3) of title 7, Code of Federal 

16 Regulations (or successor regulations)). 

17 ‘‘(6) WHOLE GRAIN REQUIREMENT.—Notwith18 standing the final rule of the Secretary entitled ‘Nu19 trition Standards in the National School Lunch and 

20 School Breakfast Programs’ (77 Fed. Reg. 4088 

21 (January 26, 2012)) or any other provision of law— 

22 ‘‘(A) the Secretary shall only require that 

23 half of all grains in federally reimbursed meals, 

24 foods, and snacks sold in schools are whole 

25 grain-rich; and 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1146 IS

1 ‘‘(B) school food authorities shall comply 

2 with the applicable grain component or stand3 ard with respect to the school lunch or school 

4 breakfast program that was in effect prior to 

5 July 1, 2014.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
n••••••••11.•••••

LatiLlaq 947,71110

OPERAT 

FR9

Artmo- ?Mai oFFIcE,: wan , CALIF

& SFACE.,DIV, SUNNYVALE, CALIF

Ii3CESEED lasfinzs & SEAM DIV VATS, CALIF (COURIER)

DOUGLAN:'48.04FT „COMPANY , VATS, CALIF. (COURIER)

MIESITE DIVISION, VATS, CALIF (COURIER)

.

TECHNICAL. EVALUATION STAFF, P.O • BOX 150

.

17; VATS, CALIF

Ulla

„MISSILES

.PORM ."-
346

t . - . -.,-.1,.(-... 41459*

..-,

,J.,:.•/.12. FAc/t)itt.

. ,....

. . •:::::

miTELY:5.3cr

0Jr.Ht • .

Acro

AT ON ER. 'pi

.., SECONDS

EiT TAME NT

OCCURRED .:),,62•43'.840ti#8 AS A

li*DEPX0/031E. Piggiall**NaThEk.:$0#:!toNTINuEr)

;,010*.11.oz!.sxam.61IntitioN ifOjNitli. THRUST

U0Tifigt; gitnui IND ,Ttliti SPERO DATA

' I ][..; 14.

" ' •

"
X: Y

PRom nor PAD Belo ON
#### Lemm (Edith), Respondent, vs. Hartzheim, Appellant, Lemm (Walter), Impleaded Defendant and Respondent.

For the appellant: *Hannan, Johnson & Goldschmidt,*attorneys, and *Martin R. Paulsen*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Seth W. Pollard,*attorney, and *C. F. Mikkelson*of counsel, both of Milwaukee.

For the impleaded defendant: *B. J. Hasting*of Mayville.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 2 3

- 1814 LT Case No. 2021

- CF

- 001217

_____________________________
P HU T RONG N GO , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County

. Mary Hatcher , Judge

. William R. Ponall and Eric J. Sorice, of Ponall Law
, Maitland , for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General
, Tallahassee, and Marissa Vairo Giles, Assistant Attorney General
, Daytona Beach , for Appellee.

April 11, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
E IS NAUGLE , B OATWRIGHT , and M AC I VER , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 24, 2018

No. 04-17-00804-CR

James MCDONALD,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR12465

Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with the court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK 

OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on January 24, 2018.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of January, 2018.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
| 1.   | The Report is not in compliance with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the reasons discussed in Note 1B of the financial statements; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Somerset International Group, Inc. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | SOMERSET INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.                                                   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                 |
|   | By:    /s/ John X. Adiletta                       |
|   |          John X. Adiletta                    |
|   |          President, Chief Executive Officer, |
|   |          Chief Financial Officer             |
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release # 05-13

Contact: (703) 808-5050 December 6, 2013

NROL-39 Lifts Off on December 5

A National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) payload was successfully launched 

aboard a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket from Space Launch Complex-3E, 

Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, at 11:14 PST, on December 5, 2013. 

“This launch adds another powerful tool to the nation’s national security toolkit. It 

once again demonstrates the efficiencies of CubeSat rideshare on an NRO 

mission. I couldn’t be more pleased and proud of the combined government and 

contractor launch team,” said Colonel Clint Hunt, United States Air Force, 

Director, Office of Space Launch, NRO. 

In addition to the main NRO payload, this rocket carried to orbit the Government 

Experimental Multi-Satellite (GEMSat) rideshare payload on a specially designed 

Aft Bulkhead Carrier, located on the aft section of the Atlas V Centaur upper 

stage. The GEMSat deployed 12 experimental CubeSats, or “nano-satellites,”

seven sponsored by the NRO and five sponsored by the National Aeronautics 

and Space Administration.

NROL-39 is the last of two NRO launches in 2013. The next NRO launch is on 

schedule for March 2014 from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida. 

-NROThe NRO is a joint Department of Defense-Intelligence Community organization responsible for 

developing, launching, and operating America’s intelligence satellites to meet the national 

security needs of our nation.
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR May 21, 1973

•

MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE

SUBJECT: CORONA History

IJ

I FROM DEC OF LED teilleilt MLLE

EXECUTIVE ORDER 116S2 EXEMPTION CATEGORY 512 DECLASSIFY ON IMP Der.

"P--SECRET5111111"7"1"All.

Jointl

1St NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

w.

I have seen the CORONA history which was published in

the Spring 1973 edition of Studies in Intelligence. As I

recall, the decision to develop the CORONA history in the

TALENT-KEYHOLE compartment was made in order that CORONA's

operational achievements would become more widely understood

and appreciated within the intelligence community. I find,

however, that the published article has extensively . treated

on-going BYEMAN aspects which should continue to be protected

despite the phase-out of the CORONA program.

Questions have already been raised within the DOD relative

to the article and its impact on the BYEMAN comp

apparent inconsistency in the rules governing th stem

as introduced by the article may serve to degrade our a ity

to effectivel age the NRP security program and to protect

on-goi ctivities. I am particularly concerned about

the ap le-stan ch exists as a result of the

article vis-a-vis the artment and the newly

created

Introduction of ambiguity into current BYEMAN management

may seriously detract from historical profit gained by publication of CORONA information in the TALENT-KEYHOLE domain.

I recommend that the CORONA article be recompartmented

into the BYEMAN system until such time as the CORONA history

is purged of on-going BYEMAN inferences.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                         Consent of Independent Auditors




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 [No. 333-09349], Form S-3 [No. 333-85923], Form S-3 [No. 333-34574]
and Form S-8 No. [333-42710]) of AVAX Technologies, Inc. and in the related
Prospectus of our report dated February 23, 2001, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of AVAX Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31,
2000.




                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
March 30, 2001
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 1890

SEDGEWICK HOMES, LLC , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. CHRISTOPHER BART BIVINS; GRETCHEN WYNE BIVINS; JOSEPH LYNN SHOEMAKER; EMILY GROCE SHOEMAKER , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of South Carolina , at Statesville

. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. ( 5:16

- cv
- 00049

- GCM )

Submitted : January 28, 2021 Decided: February 8, 2021

Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
W. Thad Adams, III , Samuel A. Long, Jr., Christina D. Trimmer, Lucas D. Garber , SHUMAKER , LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP , Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appell ant

. Gary L

. Beaver , NEXSEN PRUET PLLC , Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Sedgewick Homes, LLC, appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellees’
motion s for attorney’s fees and costs under 17 U.S.C. § 505. We review an award of attorney’s fees for abuse of discretion. See Zoroastrian Ctr. & Darb

- E

- Mehr of Metro. Wash., D.C. v. Rustam Gui v Found

. of N.Y. , 822 F.3d 739, 754 (4th Cir. 2016). We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. Sedgewick Homes, LLC v. Bivins , No. 5:16

- cv
- 00049

- GC M (W.D.N.C. July 17, 20 19 ). We decline to award additional attorney’s fees on appeal. 4th Cir. R. 46(e). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument woul d not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED