NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

Ale via BYEMAN 

Control System 

sumingepounm 

JNI 2. 1967 

MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD 

SUBJECT: January 5, 1967 MOL Management Meeting 

This memorandum provides an official record of the 

MOL Program Office and Systems Office understanding as 

regards the decisions and direction for each of the 

subjects which follow: 

Program Funding 

The Phase II development program will proceed 

against an FY 67 funding level of $228.0 million NOA 

and a planning level of $510.0 million for FY 68. FY 67 

funds will be tracked very closely to conserve funds, 

where possible, to apply to FY 68. 

We will proceed with an FY 68 program based 

on the "Blue Book" baseline requirement for $587.0 

million until such time as a departure from this baseline is dictated by FY 68 funding limitations or technical 

problems. We will also protect the option to pursue an 

FY 68 program funded to a level of $480.0 million, and 

will make a decision during late FY 67/early FY 68 as 

to the level on which we can proceed. 

I have assigned this as a joint Program/Systems 

Office action. 

Negotiation of Undefinitized Program Requirements 

The schedule for completing negotiations by 

June 1967 for the presently undefinitized program requirements was approved by Dr. Flax and the Director, MOL. 

This is a Systems Office Action. 

Special Contractual Procedures 

The contract termination liability clause is 

to be excluded from MOL program black contracts. This 

clause is ready excluded from the MOL white contracts. 

DORIAN 

8 via Bvr laIN 

,fa 

:1 ,9P rn1 

Page / of 5 pages 

Copy ! of 5 copies 

SAFSL BYE 21009-67 

EXCLUDED .71. T=ADING; 

DOD DIR. 5200.1D DOES kIT APPLY 
-sECREF Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

This action will allow the Systems Office to place on 

contract only those funds which can actively be used 

for the attainment of program baseline efforts, and 

will avoid having some portion of contract funds set 

aside as a reserve for contract termination. 

Approval is necessary for proceeding on an 

expenditure funding basis for all MOL contracts in 

lieu of the present commitment basis. The FY 67 "Blue 

Book" estimates are based on expenditure funding. 

The MOL Program Office will pursue these 

actions in concert with OSAF-FM. 

Saturn IVB Participation 

We will continue to participate, along with 

other Air Force activities, in the NASA spent stage 

experiments program. The Systems Office, however, 

will re-examine the usefulness of including an active 

molecular sieve experiment. The Program Office will 

meet with NASA to definitize responsibility and 

establish firm costs for MOL experiments integration. 

We will continue to process, through normal channels, 

experiments which may be useful to MOL, but MOL 

astronauts will not participate in the SIVB program. 

This is a MOL Program Office/Systems Office 

action. 

Readout and Data Recovery 

We will continue to include both systems in 

the MOL baseline program. As soon as possible, the 

Systems Office will provide the costs of protecting 

the readout system studies and associated integration 

effort. By 1 April the CBS and Douglas studies will 

be evaluated and presented to Dr. Flax with an assessment of the cost impacts and required decision dates 

for each of the systems. Prior to presentation to 

Dr. Flax, there will be a MOL internal review. 

Colonel Battle, SAFSS and the Systems Office 

have this action. 

DORIAN 

Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System 

Page.2_ of .5"- pages 

Copy of copies 

SAFSL BYE 21009-67 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 Handle via BYEMAN 

Control Svster 

Thermal Doors 

The engineering design of doors to minimize 

the thermal distortion problem will be re-examined in 

February when newly generated data and Cer-vit results 

will be available from GE/EK/DAC. In the interim, 

however, the GE proposed louvre and pitch mask design 

will continue. 

This is a Systems Office action in concert 

with the Program Office. 

Acoustic Testing 

We will continue to protect the long lead 

time requirements for a low level segment test facility 

at EK, and protect the option for a higher level acoustic 

test facility. Dr. Flax concurred with the plan for 

low level acceptance testing of all system segments 

and vibration testing of the lab module. 

Contractor cost estimates will be acquired 

for a laboratory module test program based on qualification and flight level testing. 

Efforts will continue to determine the best 

combination of facility/location to satisfy MOL program 

requirements. 

Expenditure of $50K is authorized as a holding 

action. 

Action is assigned to the Systems Office. 

Support Module 

The current 30 day baseline engineering design 

was approved and will provide the physical capacity for 

an up to 60 day capability. 

Contingency Planning 

A procurement plan is to be developed to 

cover the contingency of a failure of flight #1 or 

failure of one of the manned flights 3, 4, or 5. This 

plan will consider making flight 6 or 7 a manned flight 

and would be accomplished by parallel vehicle procurement. 

DORIAN 

Handle via BUM 

Control System SECRET 

Page 3 of5-pages 

Copy of copies 

SAFSL BYE 21009-67 
NRO APPROVED FOR SECRET Handle via BYEMAN 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 Control System 

This would then leave the present flight 6 or 7 article 

available for later use. If this plan is approved, 

firm costs and decision dates will be developed for an 

additional equipped laboratory module, time phased for 

use as a back-up to flight 6, but intended for use 

with flight 8 or beyond. The availability of the 

laboratory module will enhance schedule flexibility. 

At the earliest possible date the Systems 

Office will submit, to Dr. Flax and the Director, MOL, 

an analysis of the firm costs and required decision 

dates to provide an additional Gemini B in a time 

frame which would have it availabh to cover flight #5. 

Action is assigned to Systems Office. 

Acquisition and Tracking Scope 

The selection of ITEK as the subcontractor 

to GE was concurred with by Dr. Flax and the Director, 

MOL. The ITEK contract and GE and DAC integration 

cost total of $19.5 million is $16.5 million less than 

had been budgeted for this task. 

Extended Life 

A paper for Dr. Foster on entended life time 

considerations is to be prepared for Dr. Flax's signature. 

This is a Program Office Action. 

Program Priority and Authority 

The DX priority rating letter prepared for 

Dr. Brown's signature and transmittal to OSD is to be 

signed within the next few days. 

The letter authority to proceed with MOL 

Phase II activities will be signed by OSAF shortly. 

This is a Program Office action. 

Simulation 

Dr. Flax was concerned with two aspects of 

simulation. He desired to validate that a human operator 

DORIAN 

Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System 

Page 4 oftc pages 

Copy of copies 

SAFSL BYE 21009-67 

SEW 
Handle via SITMAN 

Control System Sr NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

could indeed distinguish ground scenes under conditions 

of actual scene lighting and actual scene contrast. 

Since it is very difficult to recreate actual conditions 

by ground simulations using scene photographs, Dr. Flax 

was of the opinion that an aggressive aircraft simulation 

program should be undertaken. It was agreed that the 

Systems Office would examine the situation and develop 

a simulation program. 

Although a general consensus held that design 

of simulators, and simulation materials was a major 

problem, the Systems Office is to continue an active 

program to improve simulation fidelity, and adequacy 

of materials. 

This is a Systems Office action. 

(4141.4=- 

HARRY . EVANS 

Major General, USAF 

Vice Director, MOL Program 

DORIAN 

Handle via HUMAN 

Trio!! l Srtgn 

Page $' of 5- pages 

Copy of copies 

SAFSL BYE 21009-67 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System 

A. FUNDS 

On January 7, DoD approved a FY 1967 funding level 

of $228.4 million for the MOL Program in lieu of the 

$178.4 million previously approved. Simultaneously, 

the FY 1968 budget was reduced to $430.0 million from 

the $480.0 million previously approved. This action 

brought FY 1967 requirements and approved budget into 

agreement. However, the FY 1968 approved budget of 

$430.0 million is now approximately $157.0 million less 

than the Systems Office estimated requirements and 

$381.0 million less than the contractors' estimated 

requirements. 

The objectives, within the environment of negotiated 

fixed price incentive contracts, has been to hold the MOL 

baseline schedule as long as possible. However, in light 

of the large disparity between requirements and the 

approved budget for FY 1968, there is an immediate need 

to examine a schedule change which will bring program 

requirements into accord with funding levels which the 

DoD will support. The Vice Director, MOL conferred with 

contractors top management on February 2 on this problem. 

At this meeting each of the major associate contractors were 

asked to examine two alternatives: 

DORIAN 

FE02 Vig NEMAN 

Q.lite 7'qm 

SEM— /osfy2—, 
Handle via BYEMAN 

31 System 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

1. Examine schedule capability within funding 

constraints of $228.4 million for FY 1967, $500.0 million 

for FY 1968, and $600.0 million for FY 1969. 

2. Examine funding requirements with a ninemonth slip of the baseline flight test schedule. 

For both exercises, the contractors were told that 

the technical content of the program was not to change 

and that a dollar limited DX industrial priority should 

be assumed. The contractors are to submit their results 

to the Deputy Director, MOL on February 14. On February 15, 

top government and contractor management will meet to 

examine the cost and schedule data. At that time each 

Corporate Vice President will be asked to address their 

proposals to Dr. Flax and General Ferguson and, in 

addition, express their views on any adjustments to the 

MOL Program which they feel is worthy of top management 

attention. 

It was emphasized to the contractors that this is 

only an exercise of serious program problems and that 

they should continue to operate to the baseline schedule 

until a firm decision to change schedule is made. 

DORIAN 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System 

B. SPECIAL CONTRACTING PROCEDURES 

On January 31, 1967 Dr. Flax was briefed on the 

need for change to the existing DORIAN contract management and SE/TD responsibilities of General Martin, SAFSP 

and the Deputy Director, MOL. The need for change stems 

from the fact that the Director, MOL, because of the 

fragmentation of contract and engineering responsibility, 

does not have the necessary authority or control to 

discharge his responsibilities for total program accomplishment. 

Three options for rectifying the problem were 

presented to Dr. Flax, together with the advantages and 

disadvantages of each. The three options were: 

-- To give the Deputy Director, MOL equivalent 

authority to that now held by the Director, SAFSP. 

-- To extend General Keeling's authority to 

include approval authority for deviations from the ASPR/ 

AFPI. 

-- To clearly establish the responsibilities of 

SAFSP and SAFSL-1 so that SAFSP would provide all DORIAN 

contracting services to SAFSL-1, and SAFSL-1 would be 

responsible for GSE/TD for all MOL segments other than 

the payload sensor. 

DORIAN 

Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System 

07 /009 _4. 7 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 Randle via BYEMAN 

Control PORRI 

Dr. Flax agreed that the present working 

arrangement should be changed, and it is his intention 

to discuss the matter with the Director, SAFSP on his 

trip to the West Coast during the week of February 13. 

A memorandum treating this subject was provided 

to Dr. Flax, at his request by the Vice Director, MOL 

on February 8. This memorandum was coordinated with 

General Keeling, General Berg and 

DORIAN 

Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System 4GREF. 

,710.c: ?__-‘ 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System 

C. SIVB PROGRAM PARTICIPATION 

In a letter to Dr. Mueller dated January 27, 1967, 

Mr. D. J. Fink, Deputy Director (Strategic and Space 

Systems) ODDR&E, expressed DoD concern over the NASA 

decision to prorate integration costs among the sponsors 

of Orbital Workshop experiments. The letter suggests 

a reevaluation of the decision to bill DoD for integration costs, and requests an estimate of the 

integration costs for each of the five DoD experiments 

involved in the event that these costs are to be borne 

by the experimenters. A response by February 10 was 

requested. 

Mr. Fink's letter to Dr. Mueller is attached. 

DORIAN 

Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System 

D. READOUT AND DATA RECOVERY 

Dr. Flax has authorized limited expenditure of 

funds to retain the MOL readout option through April 1. 

On or before this date a firm decision will be made on 

whether to retain or drop this capability in the baseline design. 

Colonel Anderson of the Air Staff has informed 

the Vice Director, MOL that there is a tri-service 

interest in developing a data-link readout capability 

for aircraft applications and $1.0 million is immediately 

available to fund this effort with CBS. With this funding assistance, only a nominal $30K will be required of 

MOL to sustain the DORIAN studies at CBS. Under these 

arrangements, it is our intent, that the initial work 

statement for the tri-service data-link be tailored 

to meet MOL needs. 

Douglas integration costs are included as part of 

the baseline program and limited funds will be used to 

support Douglas design studies pending a decision on or 

before April 1. 

DORIAN 

Handle via BYEMAN 

Control Svc nn7 SEM 0719_./oa— 7 
Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System SECRET NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

E. THERMAL DOORS 

The engineering design of doors to minimize 

thermal distortion will be an agenda item for the 

February 15 meeting. 

DORIAN 

Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System 

iloo?--0 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System 

F. ACOUSTIC TESTING 

The plan, location and costs of laboratory module 

test program based on qualification and flight level 

testing will be an agenda item for the February 15 

meeting. 

DORIAN 

Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

Handle via BYEMAN 

rim",System 

G. CONTINGENCY PLANNING 

The procurement plan for the acquisition of 

additional manned flight hardware to cover the possibility 

of a failure of flight #1, or one of the programmed 

manned flights, is in preparation. The plan envisions 

an additional laboratory module time-phased to be 

available for flight #6, and an additional Gemini to 

back up flight #5. Expected completion date is 

February 27. 

Handle viatati —SEGRET— Control System /o 
Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

H. EXTENDED LIFE PAPER FOR DDR&E 

At the January 5, 1967 management meeting, Dr. 

Flax asked that a paper be prepared for Dr. Foster on 

the subject of extended lifetime for the unmanned 

automatic version of MOL. A paper in the form of a 

memorandum to the DDR&E from Dr. Flax, was submitted 

to Dr. Flax for his review on January 16, 1967. 

Dr. Flax made changes in the memorandum and sent 

it to Dr. Foster on January 20, 1967. The most important 

changes were to add the note that "the proposed approach 

to MOL lifetime extension was similar to practices 

successfully followed in other reconnaissance programs 

of the NRO", and the addition of a request for DDR&E 

concurrence in the approach proposed for the automaticmode MOL. 

Colonel Heran was advised of this action on January 31, 

1967 by a teletype from General Evans. The message quoted 

an anticipated go-ahead memorandum from Dr. Foster to 

Dr. Flax. The approving memorandum from the DDR&E was 

sent to Dr. Flax on January 31, 1967. 

The MOL Program Office is preparing a memorandum for 

Colonel Heran, providing direction on the implementation 

of the extended lifetime support module. 

DORIAN 

Handle via BYEMAN 

.07 /00?_--. Control System 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System 

I. MOL PRIORITY 

In a memorandum for the Secretary of Defense 

dated January 7, 1967, Dr. Brown recommended action 

to establish BRICKBAT .01/DX status for MOL. Secretary 

McNamara has assigned the matter to Assistant Secretary 

(I&L) Ignatius for staff action. No official response 

from OSD has been received. Dr. Flax has directed 

preparation of a detailed, current justification for 

DX industrial priority for use in discussions with OSD 

in the event such discussions are required. Preparation 

of this package is in progress. 

DORIAN 

Handle via BYEMAN 

Control frilr"41 

--SECRET- O 9- 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 —SECREF Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System 

J. SIMULATION 

An investigation of the feasibility of an aircraft 

simulation program is in progress; a draft plan is in 

internal Systems Office review, and the question of 

aircraft availability is under study. This is an 

agenda item for February 15. 

DORIAN 

/Ingle via BYE MA 

Control &Islam -SEM- / 9-4 7 
NRO APPROVED FOR Handle via BYEMAN. 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 Control System 

IV. A. MOL TERMINATION COST, FY 1967 AND 1968 

The MOL funds available through FY 67 are 

presently considered adequate to fund the major contractors through June on the basis of expenditures 

incurred plus earned fee, but are not adequate to cover 

termination liability as well. The funding disparity 

in FY 68, already recognized as a major problem, will be 

compounded even further if we are required to fund 

contracts on a commitment rather than an expenditure 

basis. Under normal DoD funding policies, reserves 

for termination liability are to be specifically earmarked, although not necessarily to be released to the 

contractors. 

The present forecast is that termination liabilities 

for the major contractors will approximate $91.0 million 

by the end of June 1967, increased to $112.6 million by 

December 1967, and then steadily decrease reaching $80.8 

million by the end of June 1968. All major contractors 

involved have stated that they will accept expenditure 

funding for the contract periods. The specific problem 

then is to identify potential funding sources in the 

event the program should terminate in any particular 

month. 

DORIAN 

Handle via BYEMAN 

Control Smeni --SECRET- x /009-- 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

de via —OFF DYNAN Ra 

Control Systing 

This problem was addressed at the January 5 MOL 

Management Meeting and again with Dr. Flax on three 

separate occasions since then. Based on information 

provided him, Dr. Flax has agreed to work this problem 

by either identifying a potential source of funds within 

the Air Force, or, if this is not possible then asking 

DoD concurrence and assistance in meeting the eventuality 

of program termination. 

DORIAN 

Handle via BYEMAN tr,CRET 69-1 7 

Control Pirt-- 
Handle via MAN 

Control System 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

IV. B. AUTHORITY TO PROCEED WITH PHASE II 

On January 13, 1967, Dr. Flax formally authorized 

continuation of engineering development of the MOL 

Program. A copy of his memorandum is attached. 

DORIAN 

Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System -4EGREF 
• 

NRO PROVED FOR 

RELEC4SE 1 JUL 

OFFICE OF E DRzCTC 1.,'E-FE RESEARCH A ' ENGINEERING ' 

Wil,:i1-11:'40TON, 0. C. 20301 

27 JAN '267 

Dr. George E. Mueller 

Associate Administrator 

Office of Manned Space Flight 

Na: al Aeronautics and Space 

Administration. 

Washington, D. C. 20546 

• Dear George: 

I have recently been informed about NASA plans regarding the 

allocation of costs for integrating Air Force experiments in the 

• S-IVB Orbital Workshop, In negotia.' ti.on's with NASA Headquarters 

and Center personnel on. acc:eptance. of DOD experiments for the 

• Orbital Workshop, it was initially Understood that NASA intended • 

- to pay for the integration of all experiments. It is now our understanding that NASA plans to prorate these costs and bill the DOD • 

.-1 for experiment integration, 

I I poorly defined and dependent on uncertain dchedule s . At present, 

I am concerned that the costs of doing the experiments may end up 

I I we have no basis for making a valid estimate of integration costs. . . 

1 I would appreciate your re--evaluation of the decision to require the 

.. 

experiment sponsor to defray integration costs. 

We are reviewing the experiments in DOD to re-evaluate our participation in the Orbital Workshop. In the event that integration costs 

are to be borne by the experimenter, will you please provide me 

your estimate of the integration cost for each of the five DOD .experiments, together with an explanation of the basis or ground rules used 

in deriving these estimates.. It will be appreciated if this information 

can be provided by 10 February 1967. 

' . Since ely, 

Daniel S. Piik 

'Deputy Director • 

Strategic and Space Sysiems) 

• 

• • 

. • . 

• 

• 
6s...a4 

Alexander H. Flax 

Assistant Secretary' 

Research & Development' 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

DEPARTMENT OF THE is.111. FORCE 

livAsH1N3ToN. 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

January 13, a967' 

=0RANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, ,nNNED ORBITING LABORATORY (MOL) 

PROGRAM 

Authorization. co Proceed with the.• Engineering 

Development Phase of the MOL Program 

As Director of the MOL Program, you are authorized to 

continue with the engineering development of the MOL System. 

Release of DOD deferred FY .67 funds in the amount of 

420,000,000 is granted to continue the contracted MOL Phase 

II Development Program with the understanding that actual 

obligations and expenditures on each major segment of the 

program are to be reviewed in detail prior to release of 

remaining FY 67 funds. Control of FY 67. and FY 68 expenditures and commitments to minimum levels compatible with 

approved program objectives is essential. FY 67 funding is 

now established at a maximum of $228'million. However, reductions of FY 67 program fund requirements which may result 

from actions initiated or taken at the January 5, 1967_MOL 

management meeting should be fully considered.. FY 68-funding levels will be established following resolution of issues 

addressed at that meeting and updating of the financial plan 

based on actual experience prior to the last quarter of FY 67. 

I request to be advised on a continuing basis of any 

disparity that might' exist between fund availability and baseline requirements as actual experience in obligating funds 

develops. Based on this experience, reprogramming of additional 

program funds, as necessary, or alternatively slipping devel-- 

opment and flight schedules for all or part of the baseline 

program will be examined.. 

SUBJECT.. 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE. 1 ULY 201 

00012. r 

7.47W -6 ilanffie, via BVEMAq. 

Colitrol System 

AGENDA''' 

FOR 

MOL MANAGEMENT MEETING 

January 5? 1967 

Washington, D. CY 

MORNING SESSION 

A. INTRODUCTION 

TTME - COST PROGRAM OPTIONS 

Status of FY 6I/FY 68 Funds - 

Optimum Time to Recognize-. 

sitpptfe if Funds are Limited 

C. SCHEDULE FOR DEFINITIZING 

CONTRACTUALLY DEFERRED ITEMS 

SATURN. IVB _ 

Reevaluation of Air. Force. 

Participation, in NASkyrogram. 

0900 0930 

0910 094a-: 

0940 - •1000 

1200 .-, 1020- 

General Evans 

Colonel Randall' 

Colonol Dietrich 

'Lt/Colone1 Skantze 

B R E A K 

E. WIDE BAND READ OUT 

Review of MOL Implementation Plans 

for a Read-out System 

Mr. Strong 

1020 - 1030 

1030 - 1045 

• 1-;alifilo via 

gontrol System 

.r? 
BREAK 

• SIMULATION STUDIES. AND'PLANNING 

,FOr Exploring Astronaut Capabilities 

and Time Lines 

\4) liaRele via BYEMAti 

Control System 

unfOliirq 

2 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RElofASE 1 JULY 2015 SECRET Elantle via 

Control,System.. 

. THERMAL DOORS 

Proposed Baseline Design Change 

• Emerson. 1045 1105H 

G. ACOUSTIC TESTING 

"Acoustic Test Requirements at 

Contractor/GovernMent Location 

H. DISCUSSION AND EXECUTIVE SESSION 

AFTERNOON SESSION, 

A. IMAGE VELOCITY SENSOR 

Performance. Capability of IV as 

a Cloud Sensor 

. SUPPORT MODULE STUDIES , 

Baseline. Configuration'and 

Extended Life Capability 

C. ACQUISITION AND TRACKING SCOPE 

StUdies on Enlarged Scope. 

Mr. Strong: 

1135 

1330 

Mr.. Meltyer 1400 

Mr= Sampson 1430 

1500 

Mr.- Bernstein 1515 

Mr. Tennant 1105 - 1135. 

- 1215'. 

- 1400 

1430 

- 1500 

• - 1515 

- 1545 

-•••■■••■•= 
INITIAL SIMULATION ACTIVITIES 

AEROSPACE /SAFSL 

LOCKHEE D 

PLAN FOR FUTURE SIMULATION ACTIVITIES 

SECRET"- SPECIAL HANDLING 

• 

• 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 CLCRET - SPECIAL HANDLING 

I 

ACTIVE TARGET DETECTION SIMULATION ACTIVITIES 
iF 

ENVIRONMENTAL Ft 

f • 

or.catir •SPECIAL HANDLIV: 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

TRPOSE 

SECRET.SPECIAL HANDLING 

INITIAL SIMULATION ACTIVITIES 

t+of ••7/419 

TAittig. A. 114 dii %./s• ■ 140.6.4) 

• "SEARCH LIMITED DESIGNATED AREAS" 

LINES TO: 
NRO APPROVEIYFOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

- SPECIAL HANDLING 

AEROSPACE/SAFSL SIMULATION 

SIMULATION CONDITIONS 

TWO CONTRAST LEVELS 

-- SIX VARIATIONS IN EQUIPMENT 

FIVE SETS OF SUBJECT. MATTER (GAMBIT MATERIAL: 

300 SCENES/20% ACTIVE) 

I 

THIRTEEN SUBJECTS (P. I. Ss) 

VOICE CUEING 

STATIC DISPLAY 

• SIMULATION PROCEDURES 

SIX- AND 10-SECOND DISPLAY TIME 

SUBJECTS REQUIRED TO DECIDE STATUS 

SUBJECTS REQUESTED TO RESPOND AS RAPIDLY 

AS POSSIBLE 

- IMPORTANCE OF MINIMIZING FALSE ALARMS STRESSED 

(PARTICULARLY 6-SECOND TESTS) 

SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

CORRECT ACTIVE 

FALSE ALARMS 

FULL DURATION 

RESPONSE 

6.58 

6.42 

5.40 

/) • 

b c d 

SUBJECTS 

-SPECIAL HANDLING 

6.45 

4.43 

100.. 

80- 

.PERCENT 

60- 

40- 

20- 

0 

8. 65 

3.20. 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 -9Beftel--SPECIAL HANDLING 

SUBJECT SCORES 

• 10-SECOND RESPONSE TIME 
NRO APPROVE) FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 3ECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

SUBJECT SCORES 

• 6-SECOND RESPONSE TIME 

CORRECT ACTIVE 

FALSE ALARMS 

FULL DURATION RESPONSE 

PERCENT 80- 

60- 

40-- 

20- 

SUBJECTS 

SECRET _SPECIAL HANDLING 

100:- Ca= 

fiNkr.11Paralli 
NRO APPROVED FOR "Seettfai"-- SPECIAL HANDLING 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

SPECIAL PHOTOS ENHANCEMENT FACTOR VS. ACCURACY 

o Active Target Mode 

SPECIAL PHOTOS 

ENHANCEMENT 

FACTOR 

Visibility = .5 

Probability of Losing Next Cluster = .5 

% Active Alternates = 6 

Ti Active Primaries = 4.2 

135 Primaries/day 

180 Alternates/day 4 ‘ 

A 10 OND SIMULATION RESULTS 

Z. 0 — \\ \ 

qk• 6-SEC 

.0V 

3.0 

SIMULAT RESULT 

PROBABILITY OF CORRECTLY 

DETERMINING ACTIVITY = KA 

.1.0 

.0 

.6 1.0 

.4 

.2 

.21 T 

-.4 

1f 

.6 ',lie 

a 

1.0 

FALSE ALARM PROBABILITY = Kr 

•Seeftirf - SPECIAL HANDLING HB-1033 
TIME SECONDS. 

i- 50 

-4-400VIEW (g) (TD-13) 

_VEHICLE POSITION (4) TD 

.I SO • 

VEHICLE POSITION CO TD-13 

CLOSEST ACCEPTABLE 

LOCATION @ TD 

(-5° to -20° STEREO) 

VEHICLE POSITION (i) TD 

G' NRO APPROVEIYFOR ie,) s' 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

--Seeltelr-SPECIAL HANDLING 

SPECIAL PHOTOS ENHANCEMENT FACTORS FOR CLUSTERED TARGETS 

o 0.5 VISIBILITY 

PRIMARY 

ROLL 

HISTORY 

r

10 

GROUND 

TRACK 

L 

s t t 

30 20 10 0 10 

MIRROR ROLL ANGLE DEGREES 

SCCRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

ENHANCEMENT 

FACTOR 

\ 

100 NM 

CLUSTER 

50 -NM 

CLUSTER 

KA ' 5 

- 1.0 0 8.02 4. 8 

., . 1 6.21 4.16 

.2 5.00 3.96 

.85 0 7.15 4.29 

.1 5.49 3.7 

. 

. 2 4.35 3.18 

.7 0 6.43 3.87 

. 1 4.73 3.19 

o 

.2 3.7 2.74 

20 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

-enenpr - SPECIAL HANDLING 

LOCKHEED SIMULATION 

O SIMULATION CONDITIONS 

▪ FOUR VARIATIONS IN EQUIPMENT (ZOOM CAPABILITY) 

• THREE CONTRAST LEVELS (CHANGE EVERY 8 TARGETS) 

THREE SETS OF SUBJECT MATTER (GAMBIT EPD MATERIAL) 

DYNAMIC DISPLAY WITH STATIC AND SCAN TARGETS 

▪ VISUAL/ VOICE CUEING 

- SUBJECTS (PRIMARILY FLIGHT CREW) 

14 TESTED ON STATIC TARGETS 

8 TESTED ON SCAN TARGETS 

O SIMULATION PROCEDURES 

FORCED CUEING, 7-10 SECONDS, CUES AT 50X 

10-SECOND DISPLAY TIME FOR STATIC TARGETS, 15 SECONDS 

FOR MULTIPLE TARGETS 

SUBJECTS REQUESTED TO RESPOND RAPIDLY/MINIMIZE FALSE ALARMS 

TARGET AUTOMATICALLY REJECTED IF NO DECISION MADE 

IN DISPLAY TIME 

-646RE013- - SPECIAL HANDLING_ 
COLLIMATOR LENS 

• ANGENIEUX 

ZOOM LENS 

FOCAL LENGTH 

— EXTENDER. 

FLIP MIRROR 

FIELD LENS 

c 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

LOCKHEED SIMULATOR 

BIAS LIGHT SOURCE 

CUEING PROJECTOR 

3-AXIS DYNAMIC FILM TABLE 

RELAY LENSES(4) 

PHOTOGRAPHIC 

OBJECTIVES 

KOMURA f /1.4 85MM 

EYEPIECE 

Optics Simulated 5 Inch 10 Inch 10 Inch 15 Inch 

Magnification in '25x - 100x 50x ' 50x - 100x(150X) 75x - 150x • 

Zoom Range 

Exit Pupil Diameter 5Tim-1.25mm 5mm 5mm - 2.5mm 5mm - 2.5mm . 

(Requested) 

Exit Pupil Diameter 2.5mm-1.25mm .2. Smm 2.5mm-2.5mm 2.5mm - 1.25mm 

(Provided) (1. 67mm) 

SECRET - SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

—SeettEur-- SPECIAL HANDLING 

LMSC SIMULATION RESULTS 

O STATIC TARGETS (43 SCENES; 19 ACTIVES) 

OVERALL SCORES 

• CORRECT ACTIVES -.- 78% NO NOTICEABLE EFFECTS OF 

VARYING OPTICAL CONFIGURATION 

• FALSE ALARMS — 17% 

TIME OF RESPONSES (EFFECT OF AUTOMATIC REJECTION Q T 

• 78% OF CORRECT ACTIVES OCCUR AT s,6 SECONDS 

• 80% OF CORRECT REJECTS OCCUR AT k 10 SECONDS 

• 93% OF MISSED ACTIVES OCCUR AT z 10 SECONDS 

.o 48% OF ALL RESPONSES OCCUR AT z 10 SECONDS 

O SCAN TARGETS (7 SCAN AREAS, 16 TARGETS, 6 ACTIVES) 

OVERALL SCORES 

CORRECT ACTIVES — 70%- 

• FALSE ALARMS 5% 

O VALIDITY OF RESULTS 

LIMITED SAMPLES (REPEATED RUNS AGAINST SAME MATERIAL) 

▪ CUEING AIDS PREPARED FROM TRIAL. MATERIALS 

AUTOMATIC REJECT 

TIME RESPONSE DATA 

• INDICATOR DEFINITIONS 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

■, 1;7 r2, 

r"-• 

Staeltholi-SPECIAL HANDLING 

.FUTURE SIMULATION PLANS 

O ADDITIONAL LIMITED 6 /SAFSL SIMULATIONS 

O ADVANCED SIMULATIONS 

o EDS/MDS AT GENERAL ELECTRIo 

o'`4 OTHERS (?) 

ESPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

--seetteir-- SPECIAL HANDLING 

' FUTURE 0 /SA.FSI.. SIMULATION EFFORT 

PURPOSES: 

- CONTINUE SIMULATION ACTIVITIES UNTIL GE SIMULATOR 

AVAILABLE 

PROVIDE ADDITIONAL STATISTICAL DATA 

• BIOCULAR VS MONOCULAR VIEWING r 

DEVELOP SIMULATION PROCEDURES 

NEW SIMULATOR 

-. 50X '4 100X (RAPID STEP CHANGE OF MAGNIFICATION) 

BIOCULAR & MONOCULAR EYEPIECES 

MATERIALS: SAME AS PRECEDING IN-HOUSE WORK 

SUBJECTS: c. 

PI AND DESIREABLY CREW 

- BETTER SUBJECT SCREENING 

VIEWING TIME: VARIABLE NO LONGER THAN i0 SECONDS 

- SPECIAL HANDLING- 

. 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

- SPECIAL HANDLING 

ADVANCED SIMULATIONS 

0 PURPOSES 

EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT 

ACTIVE TARGET MODE CONCEPT VALIDATION/ 

STATISTICAL DATA 

- TRAINING 

SIMULATION REQUIREMENTS 

- , COMPATIBLE WITH ACQUISITION SYSTEM RESOLUTION 

PERFORMANCE 

60:1 APPARENT FIELD 

▪ ZOOM CAPABILITY 60X - 120X 

SIMULATE SCENE" DRIFT 

SIMULATE SCANNING LIMITED AREAS 

VARIABLE HAZE/CONTRAST LEVELS 

• POSSIBLE APPROACHES 

2D SIMULATION USING ONLY G & G3STIMULUS 

(MINIMUM REQUIREMENT) 

ABOVE PLUS ADDITIONAL STIMULUS FROM AIRCRAFT 

OR MODEL PHOTOGRAPHY 

3D SIMULATIONS VIA AIRCRAFT OR MODELS 

• 

SECRET - SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

\ ehSPECIAL HANDLING 

USE OF Z1 TARGETS 

TARGET CATEGORIES APPLICABILITY 

OF US 

MISSILE DEPLOYMENT & TEST • 

GROUND FORCES 

AIRFIELDS 

RADAR/COMMUNICATIONS DEPLOYMENT 

INDUSTRY 

MISSILE. PRODUCTION & LOGISTICS 

RESPECTIVELY YES TO ? 

NO 

NUCLEAR WEAPONS 

BW/CW 

NUCLEAR MATERIALS 

AIRCRAFT PRODUCTION NO - 

NAVAL ACTIVITY ' YES 

RADAR /COMMUNICATIONS < ? 

MAJOR & R&D 

SECRET -SPECIAL'HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

S M. U 

- SPECIAL HANDLING 

::TIMULUS MATERI, .1.ADE- DFFS 

II IMbi•J(>: h = $9 Ild 

,j------ 

RESOLUTIO.'"LIES) 

"". h = 80 

1- 

-7 .13P 1100 II; 140 

,INES/MM • 

,iL-ZCIAL HANDLING 

2. 5 

4 I 

0 

4 

10 

C4 

0 

El 

7.5 

10 

S

iz 20 

IMULA

TOR MAGNIFICATION FOR 120X 

15 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

GECRET -SPECIAL HANDLING 

STIMULUS MATERIAL FROM MODEL PHOTOGRAPHY 

o MODEL SCALE 100 

SIMULATE 3 NAUTICAL MILES ON GROUND 

o 

1. 00 100 •-• 

FOCAL LENGTH (INCHES) 

12 

80 80 - 

60 24 

0 40 36 

H. 

*4 - 

20 

ti) 48 

60 - 

SCALE FACTOR 

10, 000 

20, 000 

0 

4 8 0 8.0 1200 0 12 .- 24i 3

1

6 

HEIGHT (FEET) FOCAL LENGTH — INCHES 

SFIGRO-T-, SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

SECRET -SPECIAL HANDLING 

2D SIMULATION CRITIQUE 

0 NEED 2D ADVANCED SIMULATOR UTILIZING G & G3STIMULUS 

MANDATORY FOR TRAINING 

REASONABLE RESOLUTION/CONTRASTS, PARTICULARLY WITH G3 

o G3 MATERIAL IN COLOR MIGHT BE AVAILABLE:1N 

LIMITED QUANTITY 

0 DON'T CONSIDER GENERATION OF ADDITIONAL STIMULUS VIA 

AIRCRAFT OR MODEL PHOTOGRAPHY 

REALISM 

4 

SCALING/FACILITY PROBLEMS 

.0 PERSPECTIVE DISTORTION 

EXTENSIVE MOSAIC WORK 

QUALITY SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER THAN G

3 VERY DIFFICULT 

TO OBTAIN 

SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 
71C 

0 40 

0 

O 

ta• 30 - 

o 

1-4 

44 

?-4 20

- 

co) 

0 

Ed' 

> 

0 

1 0 " 

0 

0 

N 

TELES

COPE MAG

NIFICA

TION TO SIMULA

TE 

I 

4 

2 1 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 rI9 

SPECIAL HANDLING 

3-D SIMULATION SCALING PARAMETERS 

50 - 10 - MAGNIFICATION 

FOV 

MODEL SCALE . 

10, 000 20, 000 30,1 000 40, 000 50, 000 

I 1 I i I 

0 100 . 200 300 400 500 

1 

0 

. 

50 100 , -150 

1 

200 250 

HEIGHT ABOVE MODEL — FEET 

0 

T 

I 

100 

200 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

SECRET -SPECIAL HANDLING 

PERSPECTIVE DISTORTION 

o 3D MODEL SIMULATION 

o MODEL SCALE = 100 

80 NM 

FROM ORBIT 

1.5 NM 

90 FT = 1.5 NM 

@ 100:1 SCALE 

-FAGREI44 PEC LA L HANDLING 

100F 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 CECRET - SPECIAL HANDLING 

3D SIMULATION CRITIQUE 

AIRCRAFT WITH TELESCOPE 3D MODEL WITH TELESCOPE 

O ADVANTAGES REALISTIC COLOR-REFLECTIONS 

& ILLUMINATION 

o CONTROLLED TEST CONDITIONS 

OF ILLUMINATION. ETC. . 

O PROBLEM AREAS 

NOT RESOLUTION LIMITED 0 

DIFFICULT TO CONTROL 

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS 

o SCALING PROBLEM IN RETAINING 

PERSPECTIVE 

REASONABLE LIMITS ON NUMBERS o 

OF FLIGHTS PROHIBIT AMASSING 

STATISTICAL DATA 

ESSENTIALLY NOT RESOLUTION 

LIMITED 

LARGE FACILITY REQUIRED TO 

PERMIT MODEL VIEWING I 

EITHER VERY LARGE MODELS OR 

MODEL SCALE >> 100:1 112.0'D 

SCALING PROBLEM IN RETAINING 

PERSPECTIVE 

FEW SCENES WOULD DETRACT 

FROM STATISTICS 

MODEL REALISM QUESTIONABLE 

- FINE DETAIL 

- REF LEC TA.NCES 

- .COLOR 

o REAL-TIME SEQUENCING OF 

TARGET UNATTAINABLE 

REAL-TIME SEQUENCING OF 

TARGETS UNATTAINABLE 

o CONTROL OF GROUND 

SITUATIONS 

HIGH COST 

TARGET REALISM HIGHLY 

QUESTIONABLE 

.0 HIGH COST 

oo RECOMMENDATION: DON'T CONSIDER EITHER 

SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 
!,,r1 741 

■1-72:7 —31teitEula-- SPECIAL HANDLING 

• NRO APPROVED' FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

ESTIMATED SIMULATION SCHEDULE 

e ACTIVE TARGET MODE 

1966 1967 

411••■•••■■■••■■•■•••••••■■• • ••••••■••■..... mos.. DJ F M A , S Q N 

O AEROSPACE/SAFSL 1 

0 LOCKHEED 

O GENERAL ELECTRIC 

• INITIAL CAPABILITY 

- FULL CAPABILITY 

• to IMPLEMENTATION. 

STUDY 

• -FABRICATION/ 

OPERATION 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

ACQUISITION SYSTEM STATUS 

-effeRMT- SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APP 

RELEA 1 JULY 2015 

LAT SPECIAL HANDLING 

REQUIREMENTS 

FUNCTIONS: 

0. ACQUISITION AND TRACKING (BACK UP TO AUTOMATIC OPERATION) 

O TARGET ACTIVITY DETECTION 

O SCAN WITHIN LIMITED 9EA 

O BACKUP NAVIGATION 

DESIGN REQUIREMENTS: 

O 3 FT. RESOLUTION FOR1HIGH CONTRAST TARGETS FOR ACTIVE 

INDICATOR IDENTIFICATION 

O 1° FOV FOR INITIAL ACTIVE INDICATOR ACQUISITION OR TARGET 

ACQUISITION AND POINTING 

O 4° FOV FOR NAVIGATION REQUIREMENT 

SCAN ANGLE REQUIREMENTS 

LATERALLY f 45° 

LONGITUDINALLY + 40° to .- 10°, NO VIGNETTING • 

+ 70° to - 40° DESIRED, VIGNETTING ACCEPTABLE 

-8.06116-7. SPECIAL HANDLING 
N APPROVED FOR 

LEASE 1 JULY 2015 —.BMW? - SPECIAL HANDLING 

CONTRACTOR STUDY RESPONSIBILITIES 

4 

OPTICAL CONTRACTORS 

O PARAMETRIC PERFORMANCE AND DESIGN STUDY , 

O PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF IMPROVED ACQUISITION TRACKING SCOPE 

O COMPATIBILITY WITH MOL LAB VEHICLE 

DOUGLAS 

O INTEGRATION INTO LAB 

SPACE ENVELOPES/STRUCTURE/DEFLECTIONS/ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL 

O FAIRINGS 

WEIGHTS/PROPULSION EFFECTS 

O ENVIRONMENTS 

VIBRATION - ACOUSTIC » THERMAL, ETC. 

O SCHEDULE/TEST/AGE 

GE 

O OPERATIONAL MODES 

O SYSTEM LEVEL REQUIREMENTS 

O ACQUISITION SUBSYSTEM DESIGN 

CUES/ CONTROLS/ ALIGNMENT MONITOR /INSTALLATION 

O T EST ING /SIMULATION / TRAINING 

..Sgrar&IrrT - SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

-mem-E-72a.A.1, ITAMLIERI 

Flexure Mount 

Upper Housing Eyepiece 

Coe Projector 

'13 

rCimbei Mount :0 

':• z• 

rLover Housing 

151116E- ma* HAHOLlEG 

PUure 1.2. 10-Inch Systems Installed La Vehicle 

Cross Section . 

• %V 

Pressure 

wiedov . 
NRO APP rno 

RELEA 1 JULY 2015 

-Seett4T-SPECIAL HANDLING 

DETAILED INSTRUMENT PARAMETERS 

ZOOM OPTICS 16 - 32X LOW RANGE 

60. - 120X HIGH RANGE 

EYEPIECE 60° APPARENT FIELD 

MINIMUM EXIT PUPIL 2 MM 

APERTURE .10 INCHES 

MONOCULAR EYEPIECE 

DER OTATION CAPABILITY 

CUE,:\PROJECTION CAPABILITY 

.• 

-666R-E'r SPECIAL HANDLING 

• 4, 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 

E SPECIAL HANDLING 

EYEPIECE 

ZOOM OPTICS 

FIELD. GROUP 

PECHAN 

DE-ROTATION 

PRISM ITEK OPTICS 

144R R ICUE 

OR 

APERTURE STOP 

IRST LOW POWER GROUP 

MIRROR 

SECOND, LOW 

POWER GROUP 

OBJECTIVE 

GROUP 

SPECIAL HANDLING 
,NRO APPROV 

RELEASE ULY 2015 

JECRET SPECIAL HANDLING GROUND RESOLUTION: It./4 OPTICS 

20° SUN ELEVATION ANG1tai:• 

80 N. MI. ALTITUDE 

INPUT 

CONTRAST 

2 3 5 10 

RESOLUTION - FEET 

• (NORMAL TO LINE OF SIGHT) 8ECWW1" SPECIAL HANDLING 
PROVED FOR 

ELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

-5feRE*4 SPECIAL HANDLING 

10 INCH SYSTEM 

TELESCOPE/SCANNER 

MOUNTING AND WINDOW 

F AI RING 

CONTROL ELECTRONICS 

295 

42 

130 

10 

TOTAL HARDWARE 477 

-666*10, SPECIAL HANDLING. 
.979 . 

.99 

4. 9 FT 40° 

3.6 FT NADIR 

3.0 FT NADIR 

10 FT NADIR 

• 979 

.99 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 Jill Y 71115 

—SW:FA-SPECIAL HANDLING 

10 INCH SYSTEM SUMMARY 

10 INCH 

INSTALLED WEIGHTOPTICAI, SYSTEM 477# 

WEIGHT INCREASE 

POWER* 

PREVIOUS 

SYSTEM 

PEAK 

AVERAGE 

210W 

14W 

RELIABILITY ALOCATION 

BOTH 

ONE 

RESOLUTION 

2:1 CONTRAST 

4:1 CONTRAST 

*MT INCLUDING CUES 

-IISeROP SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

° 

4:66.R.64 SPECIAL HANDLING 

10 INCH SYSTEM STATUS 

) 

FORMAL EVALUATION OF ITEK AND PERKIN ELMER PROPOSALS 

ITEK FINAL NEGOTIATIONS ON GE SUBCONTRACT 

GE TO SUPPLY CONTROL LOOP 

-ErEGRE-T- SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING TRACKING HEAD AND FAIRING 

(STORED IN LAUNCH POSITION) 

-SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

ENCODERS AND 

PITCH DRIVE MOTOR 

FAIRING 

SUN SHIELD 

AUX. PITCH DRIVE ' 

MOTOR 

NADIR 
'• „ 

NRO APPROVED FOR dOc 6.1.71 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

ncitisir SPECIAL HANDLING 

• 

AC.OUSTIC AND VIBRATION TESTING 

3ECRD1 SPECIAL HANDLING 
5P-41'• --, 442 

RELEAS 1 JULY 2015 

NRO APPplE 

cacrinT SPECIAL HANDLING 

4 

QUESTIONS TO BE ADDRESSED 

o WHAT SHOULD THE OVERALL VIBRATION/ACOUSTIC 

TESTING PROGRAM BE FOR MOL? 

o IS THERE A REQUIREMENT FOR AN ACOUSTIC FACILITY 

AT EXC FOR MOL? 

• 

• 

-98eRitYP SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASTETW' 

SECRET•SPECIAL HANDLING 

00- 

TEST OBJECTIVES 

o DEVELOPMENT TESTING 

ENGINEERING TEST TO PROVIDE COMPONENT ENVIRONMENTAL 

DESIGN AND QUALIFICATION TEST DATA, AND TO VERIFY 

STRUCTURAL. DESIGN 

QUALIFICATION TESTING " 

PROVE DESIGN IS ADEQUATE FOR EXPECTED ENVIRONMENT 

WITH MARGIN 

ACCEPTANCE TESTING 

PROVE PARTICULAR ARTICLE IS BUILT TO SPECIFICATIONS _ 

AND READY FOR FLIGHT. 

SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO ROVED FOR 

REL ASE 1 JULY 2015 

4 

PRESENT TEST PLAN 

SYSTEM SEGMENT COMPONENT 

1:14 I o.t, i I 

ACOUSTIC 

(EKC). 

VIBR. 

AND 

ACOUS. 

VIBR. 

C.Q.AD 

DEVELOP. 

0 

ACOUSTIC. 

(QUAL. 

STRUC. ) 

• 

____ 

VIBRATION & 

ACOUSTIC 

QUAL. 

VIBR. 

ACOUSTIC 

(EKC) 

VIBR. 

AND 

ACOUS. 

VIBR. 

VIBRATION & 

ACOUSTIC 

. - 

ACCEP. 0 --- VIBR. 

ACOUSTIC 

(EKC) VIBR. VIBR. 

VIBRATION & 

ACOUSTIC 

-seeiter-SPECIAL HANDLING 

I 

CECRETSPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

REL . 

CECRE T- SPECIAL HAND LING 

External 5oonci 

Pressure, Le.val5 

ZONE 1 

UN PRESS. 

COMP T. 

ZONE 2 

PRESS. 

COMPT. 

ZONE 3 

UPPER 

HALF 

MISSION 

MODULE 

Ovexc.a.1% 

ZONE 4 

LOWER 

HALF 

MISSION: 

MODULE 

14,5 db Ovesa.li 

-aLilelitEar-SPECIAL HANDLING 
THE EXCITATION (REF: SAFSL. 10003) 

 152 .d1) 165 db 

13 

NRO APP 

RELE 1 JULY 2015 

THE MISSION MODULE PROBLEM 

o THE. TRANSMISSION PATHS 

IA1FRAMES AT Al& A2; HINGED STRAP AT B 

INTERNAL ACOUSTICS 

• VIBRATION TEST? 

REQUIRES: TEST FIXTURES FROM SHAKERS TO ATTACH PTS Al& B 

- EXTENSIVE STRUCTURAL MODS AT ATTACH POINTS 

A DIFFICULT TEST DESIGN PROBLEM 

• ACOUSTIC TEST 

SIMULATES REAL ENVIRONMENT 
NRO APPROV 

RELEAS JULY 2015 

CAPABILITIES OF SOME EXISTING ACOUSTIC FACILITIES 

- 

LOCATION .SIZE EQUIPMENT 

TEST LEVELS 

(OVERALL) PROGRAM 

ASD, DAYTON 150,000 ft3 

(42 ft high) 

PURE TONE 

SIRENS 

162 db 

°QUASI° RANDOM 

AIRCRAFT FATIGUE 

DOUGLAS, 

SANTA MONICA 

10,000 ft3 

(30 ft high) 

ELECTROPi4EUMA TIC 

TRANSDUCER 

158 db 

RANDOM 

MISSILE & SPACE 

VEHICLES 

WY.LE LABS. 

HUNTSVILLE 

100,000 ft3 

(36 ft high) " 

iSS fib 

RANDOM 

SATURN 

' 

NORTH AMERICAN' 

LOS ANGELES 

9000 ftl 

(22 ft high) 

ii 160 db 

RANDOM 

JPL, 

PASADENA 

1000 ft3 

(14 ft Ilitigh) 

ti 

' 

154 db 

RANDOM 

' SPACECRAFT 

1-40,11.TEMOP, 

HAWTHORNE 

170 ft3 HIGH PRESSURE 

AIR MODULATOR 

a 165 db 

RANDOM 

SPACECRAFT 

COMPONENTS 

MARTIN, 

DENVER 

74 ill 

: (5 ft high) 

RANDOM SIREN 166 db 

'QUASI° RANDOM 

TITAN 1 

COMPONENTS 

MSC - NASA DUCT SHROUDS ELECTROPNEUMATIC 

TRANSDUCER ' 

169 db 

RANDOM 

APOLLO 

VEHICLE 

CONCLUSIONS: DOUGLAS & WYLE FACILITIES REPRESENT CURRENT STATE OF ART. 

165 db REALIZED ONLY IN SMALL Cr7AMBERS, OR BY SPEC. TECHNIQUES. 
NRO APPROV 

RELEASE JULY 2015 

1\13D CO= FATIGUE FACILITY 

DESCRIPTION 

• LARGE ACOUSTIC CHAMBER (70X56X42 FT) - DOOR 16X16 FT 

• SOUND EQUIPMENT.- 36 PURE TONE SIRENS - "WARBLED" 

THROUGH 50 CPS FILL 1/2 SPECTRUM 

BELOT/ 2400 CPS; 1/20 SPECTRUM ABOVE 

- AIR SUPPLY - 310,000 Cli'M 0 14.6 PS10 

INSTRUMENTATION - 72 ANALOG DATA CHANNELS ---> 342 CHANNELS 

BY (10X30) +42 

O DEFICIENCIES 

o DOOR SIZE 

o RzLIADuzry OF SIREN EQUIPMENT (FATIGUE FAILURES) 

• . NON CONTIMUOUS SPECTRUM - POOR SIMULATION OF,ACOUSTIC, 

EXCITATION 

DATA ACQUISITION AND ANALYSIS SYSTEM CUMDERSOME 

AND TIME CONSUMING 

MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR MOL TESTING 

o' INCREASE DOOR SIZE. 

o PROCURE NEW (ELECTROPNEUMATIC TRANSDUCER) RANDOM 

NOISE SYSTEM 

o PROVIDE HIGHER PRESSURE AIR SUPPLY 

o REPLACE DATA ACQUISITION AND ANALYSIS SYSTEM WITH 

DIGITAL SYSTEM 

0 IMPACT 

o • NEW FACILITY EXCEPT FOR MODIFIED CITAMDER - COST 

APPROXIMATELY 3.7M (152/165 LOCAL) 

ey 
NRO APPR 

RELEAS 1 JULY 2015 

--au:CaMP - -SPECLA.I. HANDLING 

EK PROPOSEDACOUSTIC FACILITY 

REVERBERANT ROOM 

ACOUSTIC LEVELS 

RUN DURATION 

ACOUSTIC HORNS 

AIR SUPPLY 

A 

32' x 42' x 60' 

152 DB REVERBERANT 

165 DB DIRECT RADIATION (12' LONG) 

2 MIN. AT FULL POWER 

CONTINUOUS AT 7 DB DOWN 

4 NORAIR MK VII REVERBERANT 

30 LTV 94 DIRECT RADIATION 

57,000 CU. FT. STORAGE @ 130 PSIG 

12,000 CFM/ 3000 HP AIR COMPRESSOR 

APPROXIMATE COST $4. 9M 

3EC/tET SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPR 

RELEA 1 JULY 2015 

U 

SECRET -SPECIAL HANDLING 

A POSSIBLE APPROACH -. MISSION MODULE ACOUSTIC TESTING 

 152 db 165 db 

_1 1 

._ )-- 1 i • 1 

------<;-- 

I ' ■ . 1 

RATIONALE: THE A-FRAMES FORM THE PRIMARY TRANSMISSION PATH 

FOR RESPONSE EXCITED BY THE 165 DB ENVIRONMENT 

o PROVIDE A BASIC ACOUSTIC EXCITATION OF . 152 DB OVERALL 

ADD HORN ARRAYS TO EXCITE A-FRAME MOUNTING POINTS 

TO. THE SPECIFIED LEVEL OF 165 DB OVERALL 

THIS APPROACH MAY REDUCE EKC FACILITY 'COST TO $3. OM'_ 

SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

• ey/ 

Mg. VENT 

WrrA SouND 

Ac01.J51:1C=E6CILITY 

2.71 x 33' I .Dims. 

StiPPoRT 

To Pmik.1\AIT 

AD..) VS7ViU-NT 

AIR S-roeivc,. 

S000 Cu. FT, 

Dook 

IS'x 45" 

ea-L-TV MODEL EPT•loo 

ELECIII o -PtsiEwriAric 

TeisMSDOCERS 

3- Eh Sipe. 

AIR 

(0t1F ge S‘ 

2-NoRkcous-ric.. fiv,t11 ef\IE..KA-ro 

1 %kcN R e_krk Cc4e.NIC.12, 

`--GoNTP.M. 

Roots 

2.0I % 40' 

L1\1 D Simta NcaP. 
cy/ NRO APP 

RELE 1 JULY 2015 SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

DEVELOPMENT TESTING 

ACOUSTIC TESTING IS NEEDED TO DETERMINE ACCELERATION 

LEVELS RELIABLY THROUGHOUT THE VEHICLE 

SEGMENT TESTS ARE TECHNICALLY SOUND BECAUSE OF THE NATURE 

OF ACOUSTIC EXCITATION 

DEVELOPMENT TEST SHOULD, BE RUN AT QUALIFICATION LEVELS 

o TEST PLANNING SHOULD NOT COUNT ON THE USE OF EKC FACILITY.' 

BECAUSE OF POTENTIAL DIFFICULTIES IN BRINGING IT ON LINE 

IN TIME AND MAKING AVAILABLE TO DAC 

ci TWO`CANDIDATES EXIST:. 

WYLE AT HUNTSVILLE 

DOUGLAS AT SANTA MONICA 

--9EeRS-rLSPECIAL HANDLING 
po.) 

NRO APPROVED FOR c y 

RELEASE 1 

6BeRFAI-SPECIAL.FIA.NDLING 171-- - 

4 

• EKC ACOUSTIC FACILITY SCHEDULE 

• MM DEVELOPMENT 

ACOUSTIC TEST 

INSTALLATION Ez CHITiCKOUT 

DESIGN 

1CONSTRUCTTON 

i _ 3

I 1 

6 9 12 • 15 18 11 24 27 34 

MONTHS FROM GO-AHEAD 

1 DEC. 66 15 MAR. 1 JUN 

ORIGINAL SCHEDULE •15 FEB. 

1968 

• 1. 

SOURCE: BRIEFING BY DAVID SMITH, EKC - 28 NOVEMBER 1966 

EX TWX DATED 18 NOVEMBER 1966 STATES: "LONG LEAD ITEMS 

(COMPRESSORS) FOR THE ACOUSTIC TEST FACILITY WILL 

DELAY SHIPMENT OF DSMM UNTIL 15 JUNE 1968." 

-€1BeR:6-7 SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 001 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

CECRET—SPECIAL HANDLING 

4 

WYLE AND DAC S—M FACILITY MOD COST 

(DEVELOPMENT TESTING) 

WYLE DAC 

MODS (LM re MM) MODS (LM ONLY) 

EXCAVATE CHAMBER .08 NEW BUILDING .40 

6 HORNS (EPT-200) .13 3 HORNS (EPT-200) 06 

9000 CFM COMPRESSOR .15 SHROUD .05 

MODEL TEST PROGRAM .04 INSTRUMENTATION .25' 

AIR SYSTEM .03 ENGINEERING . 23 

MECHANICAL AGE 12 AIR SUPPLY 01 

.$1. DOM 

ENGINEERING . 54 

$1. OOM 

LM AND MM 

3 HORNS (EPT-200) .06-.. 

COMPRESSOR . 22 

LINES .01 

ENGINEERING . 09 

--$73-$M • 

GRAND TOTAL $1. 38M 

3ECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVE FOR G 7/ 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

CCCRCT- CPECIAL HANDLING 

4 

QUALIFICATION TESTING 

® COMPLETE LAB VEHICLE QUALIFICATION APPEARS DIFFICULT 

• SEGMENT QUALIFICATION TESTS WITH PROPER INTERFACE SUBSTITUTES 

CAN ESSENTIALLY PROVIDE SATISFACTORY TEST 

• DEVELOPMENT TEST PROVIDES GOOD STRUCTURAL QUALIFICATION, 

BUT ONLY GROSS COMpONENT ENVIRONMENT SIMULATION 

o ITYLE FACILITY REPRESENTS MOST DIFFICULT LOGISTICS PROBLEM 

FOR LM AND MM 

MODIFIED SANTA MONICA FACILITY COULD BE USED FOR BOTH LM & MM 

WITH LEASE LINE CONNECTION TO AGE IN HUNTINGTON BEACH 

(USE THERMAL VACUUM AGE INTERFACE UNITS AND VIDEO LINK) 

SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

ACCEPTANCE TESTING CONSIDERATIONS 

• TWO SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT 

PRE- AND POST-CHECK WITH ARTICLE SUBJECTED TO 

FLIGHT LEVEL ENVIRONMENT (LIKE 1 MIN) 

• LOWER THAN FLIGHT LEVEL VIBRATION TESTS WITH CHECK 

FOR INTERMITTENT FAILURES DURING EXCITATION 

(UP TO MANY HOURS) 

• MAJOR PROBLEM IS CHECKOUT TIME (SUMMARY CHECK OF MOST CIRCUITS) 

• LABORATORY MODULE 15 MIN > t < 60 MIN 

• TMB 

COAB 

2 MIN > t < 10 MIN 

1 MIN 
NRO APPROVED FOR Cy I 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

SECRET-SPECIAL HANDLING 

TYPICAL ACCEPTANCE VIBRATION DEFECTS•: 

o LOW LEAKAGE RESISTANCE, NOISE IN RECORD PATH, 

' W81 CABLE REPLACED 

o THREE SCREWS ON HEATER CONTROLLER AND TWO SCREWS 

ON TEST BOX CONNECTION LOOSENED IN VIBRATION .- REPLACED 

o INTERMITTENT CPL-3 OUTPUT - WIRE WAS INTERMITTENT, 

OPEN AT LUG 

• LOOSE CONNECTING ROD ON APERTURE MASK ASSEMBLY - REPLACED 

o SCREW AND WASHER LYING IN CAMERA'- BELIEVED DROPPED 

DURING ASSEMBLY 

CAMERA ROLLER EXCESSIVE END PLAY - REPAIRED 

o PIVOT STUD BACK OUT - REPAIRED 

'•SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 2015 

00 , 

- CP2CTAL HANDLING 

ACCEPTAVCE TEZTTNG 

o AT LEAST "LOU LEVEL" TEST MANDATORY AT SEGMENT LEVEL 

• SOME TYPE OF COMPLETE SYSTEM TEST NEEDED roll REACCNAELE 

ALSUItANCE OF FLEGHT READINMS 

o SEGMENT ACCEPTANCE TEST ON MM NEEDED Dr.7..roaz smpravo 

• "BUNGEE SUPPORTED" SYSTEM TESTS USING SMALL SPIAIMIS AT 

NTER-SEGMENT POINTS'APPEAR OBE FEASIZILE 

' SPECIAL HANDLING 
VIBRATION FACILITY 

TEST LEVEL 

• SHAKERS 

ACOUSTIC HORNS 

AIR SUPPLY 

APPROXIMATE COST 

AMPLIFIERS 

EQUALIZERS 

CONTROLS 

LABORATORY SPACE 

I NOR. IR MK V 

1200 CFM/300HP AIR COMPRESSOR 

$1, 8M 

RMS (RANDOM) 

2 C-210 SYSTEMS 

NRO APPR 

RELEAS 1 JULY 2015 

/ • e 

c 

SECRCTASPECIAL HANDLING 

4 

LOW LEVEL EKC.FACILITY 

o ACOUSTIC FACILITY 

REVERBERANT ROOM 32' x 42' x 60' 

ACOUSTIC LEVEL 140 DB REVERBERANT 

RUN DURATION CONTINUOUS 

APPROXIMATE COST $1. 1M • 

SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPRO or—

RELEASE JULY 2015 

cy/ 

sceni--2T c1:13CLAL NDLE:G 

CONCLUSZON. CHART. 

o ACOUSTIC DEVELOPMENT TESTING NEEDED. 

SEGMENT LEVEL ACOI.r.ITEC QUALIFICATION TEST HIGHLY DLIZIRABLE. 

o LOW LEVEL ACCEPTANCE TEST TS A PRACTICAL NECECSITY AT BOTH 

SEGMENT AND SYSTEM LEVEL. 

o LOW LEVEL ACOUSTIC `MT OF MM APPEARS TO BE THE 17,?A2:Ir. COST 

OF ViallATION TEST. 

HIGH LLII1VEL MM ACOUSTIC TESTS SHOULD USE LOCALIZED HOLtN APPROACH. 

e IF LAD MODULE QUALIFICATION IS PERFORMED, TIM SANTA MONICA • • 

FACILITY.SHOULD BE MODIFIED. 

-SESPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROV 

RELEASE JULY 2015 

ALTIMNATE 1 

FULL ACOUSTIC TESTLNG 

DEVELOPMENT-QUALIFICATION-ACCEPTANCE 

occacT SPECIAL I %11DLING 

SEGMENT. COMPONENT • 

SYSTEM LM COAB LM 

DEVELOP. 

'MB 1 COAD 

VIDEIATION & 

ACOUSTIC* ACOUSTIC* ACOUSTIC 

LOWOW-LEVEL ACOUSTIC* ACOUSTIC** 

INTEMAITTENT 

VID. VIDLIA.TION C, 

ACOUSTIC 

VIB. & 

QUAL. ACOUSTIC 

VIB. , 

ACOUSTIC 

VIA=. VIDLIATION 

ACC EP. ACOUSTIC* ACOUSTIC** VID. VID. ACOUSTIC 

LOW-LEVEL 

INTERMITTENT 

* TEST AT SANTA MONICA 

4,0 TEST AT EIc (LOCALIZED I: MINS) 

nAC 

SPECIAL QUAL. ARTICLE 15. 0 M - 20M 

TEST MANHOURS • .4 M 

SM FACILITY 1. 0 M • 

ACCEPT. TEST . 5 M 

16.9 M - 21. 9I‘,1 

TOTAL COST 19.0 M- 24. OM 

Y $2. 1M 

$2. 1M 

"SECW71"3 . PECIAL HAND 
_SYSTEM 

4131mpo., 

NRO APPROV 

RELEASE JULY 2015 

LT-ii ILS7DLE:0 

ALTIT,711ATiva no. 2 ... 

FULL lar..11TELOTi1=NT AND ACCT3PTANCII: TASTE 

QUALII7ICATIC:1 T11:55M;G C:3 LM ONLY 

vaisamoposabesuaner- 

:7:2.,GMENT 

COAD 

L017 40E1 V2 L ACOUSTIC* QUAL. INTTENT 

IITL'VE3LOP 0 ACOUGTICI) ACOUSTIC*. 

Vj 

VE7.17.1. & 

ACOULTZC 

o.na*.-...M.I.MENIMISIMB 

11 

AC\;0.1t-542"72.It'2O 

Low-Luvrm LCcr., PT. tTT1NT 

LOV1-Lrn,v2L Lov7-Lnyz-3L TIT INTEP=TTENT AT ONE' V1P_AT2.:074 

szocTs. AT rs4c sAnTA MONICA 

DAC 

O SM FACILITY MOD . I. 4.M, 0 LOW IZVEL $ 90DA 

O TECT Lf.A.t,11:0u::3 ei FIX MIT Y 

o QUAL. VI Tr117.70 

CO: L17-07,7L-7,::It:13 QUAL. }PROGRAM 

O ACCLPT. TELGT 

13. - 20. OM (X' TEST .(valzour..3 40Z1 

0 UZZ; QUAL TT -10. COM 

F0.74 FL. g7 

. S121 (SAVD7G) $- C. 

$17. 3 - 22. 3D.4 

• ■ 

TOTAL NET CC•T $3. 6L1 - $13. 6161 

-efeefsw- SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

ooh 4 y/ 

t - MISS ION MODULE STRUCTURAL ARRANGEMENT' 

SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

6-$ 
COAL) 

SEGMENT COMPONcr4T ' 

DEVELOP 

QUAL. 

ACCEPT. 

SYSTEM 

LOW-LEVEL 

INTERMITTENT 

WW1. TEST 

LM 

AC U3TICe 

ACOUSTIC 

AT EN 

LL1 

VED n. 

ACOUSTIC 

TML CORD 

VIDE. It 

ACOUSTIC 

VID ti 

ACOUOTIC 

von. ei 

ACOUSTIC 

von. 

von. 

VIII. 

ACOUSTIC 

AT EN 

vo —1tEVO • vina. TEST 

el 

ACO7S3TIC 

VI. 

■ 

Cy / 

CCCECT rIPLIDLS:3 

ALT17'11ATE 1:O. 3 

FULL DEVELOYMENT AND ACCEPTANCE TESTIVG 

SEGMENT QUALIFICATION TIMTING ON MM ONLY 

*TEST PEIIFOE11411:D AT CANTA MONICA 

DAC 

ACCEDT: TEOT S 

TOTAL C93T Z. C.,?... 61.1 

--efeettLiulL SPECIAL HANDLUIG 

MODIFIED IUGH LEVEL 

ACOUSTIC FACILITY $3. H 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 z 

PO)' 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 15 

crxrusT SPECIAL HANDLING: 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

O LOW-LEVEL ACCEPTANCE TEST FOR WORKMANSHIP AND FUNCTIONAL 

CONTINUITY SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE SEGMENT AND 

SYSTEM LEVEL. 

0 CONTRACTOR ASSESSMENT OF COSTS AND SCHEDULE IMPACTS OF 

PROPOSED ALTERNATES SHOULD BE OBTAINED. 

SEGMENT LEVEL ACOUSTICAL QUALIFICATION TESTING SHOULD BE 

ADOPTED UNIFORMLY THROUGHOUT THE PROGRAM FOR MINIMUM 

RISK. 

€ECRCT SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

4 

sncrurr SPZCIAL HANDLING 

'TRACKING-MIRROR DISTORTION PROBLEM 

liaGiterT- SPECIAL HANDLING 
■-t 

NIRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

-SErraRer SPECIAL HANDLING 

TRACKING MIRROR I-IMATING 

MIRROR COATING 

SOLAR ABSORPTION II% 

VISIBLE REFLECTION 96% 

INFRARED EMISSION 4% 

SOLAR RADIATION 

ALBEDO 

-Melte? SPECIAL HANDLING 
low 

N 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

ortcncT .spr:&tAL HANDLING 

• 

GE PHASE IC DOUBLE ACTUATED DOORS WITH LOUVERS 

5Z6 -SPECIALHANDLING 
j

t e

N 

0 

0 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEAS7ULY2015 

• 
CUIL1CIAL HANDLW:3 

TRACEM:3 tnnnaa V7ITH Lcruvr,rls 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELE 1 JULY 2015 

4 

TAPERED LOUVER 

-SEGR4S-11- SPECIAL HANDLING 

MUIR= 

MUIR= MOUNT= SUNG 

• •• 

•1 
NSROAPPROVEDFOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 
NRO APPR FOR 

RELEAS 1 JULY 2015 

f171CLICT SE CL' tans! uwa 

V173 VS. nzr..2 tz:-/RTA Tvyri: 

4 40 Gail" 

23 !LOUVERS 

ORSCURATIOP 

10 MOVE= MU 

1.111Mt 

TIME SEC'S 

-814611-111* SPECIAL HANDLING 
44 

Z 

y. 

CSI 

ro 

Li 

0 

coi 

0 0 

Li 

O 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE j-JE4tY 2015 • 

TIME AE'TER BEGINNING FIRST ORMATION (HUNDREDS OF S1C'S) 

‘.1 
DOOR-OPEN TIN,I2. (HUNDRZIDS OF 

- SECONDS) 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 
NRO APPROV 

RELEASE I4IJLY 2015 

Al 

NUMBER OF DOOR CYCLES 

cn 

5 
NR • PPROVED FOR 

LEASE 1 JULY 2015 

SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

-Sreltr. -SPECIAL HANDLING 
4 6 8 

REV NUMBER 

NRO 

EASE 1 JULY 2015 

DIunriAls TET,APonAirunn 1-I!3Tellif 

4 

CZ P 4 M.Z U DCZZIS 

150 SSC/REV 

INSULATED BA= FACE 

FRONT FACE 

..••■••••"" INSULATED 

BACK FACE 

-6-STGR-Gre- SPZCIAL HANDLING 

70.204> 

70. 00 
NRO APPR ED FORRELEA 1 JULY 2015 

CECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

PERFORMANCE LOSS VS. TIME 

4. 0

U 

44 

[9 

3. 0 

2.0 

tx1 

U 

E—• 

1. 0 

5.01 GE PHASE IC DOORS . 

8 ACTIVE REVS 1-8 

150 SEC DOORS OPEN/REV 

0( al .14( = .07 62° N LAT. 

A = .38 21 MARCH p=0 

1\ I\ 

,1 ] I\ N 

\ N 

I ‘`) 11 LOUVERS + MASK 

••••••■.. 

2 4 6 • 8 10 12 

REV NUMBER 

• —SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

14- 16 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

..E.ErGIA.tr*. SPECIAL -HANDLING 

-FrOGR-S-T- SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPRO ED FOR_ 

RELEA 1 JULY 2015 CECIiET - SPECIAL HANDLING 

,c:7/ 7-6/171 ' 1/1/.57:44/LAT/C2/1/ 

.1=C/.CL)•'/C":4..eirL.6.7 

.404'°/vc- ffor'o,ey ifiovzeare 

"crsve, 

(ace ■dz*.e..4C4E.S) 

4,00.4' FA":01e*-1.4E-• 

v.e-, wee- I°!/LL, (Ure,-) 

:II/ ..es? 

"err-roc 

-92eft-eT SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR • • 

-Sreltirr SPECIAL HANDLING 

SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 
XR0 APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 "ettfti° SPECIAL HANDLING 

nL.i. 7‘'01,11TION LC&S vEnsus coaa 0,EN TILIE 

FUS^L'D SILICA AND CEII-VIT 

100 

- WIDE OPEN • 

SILICA 

40 

GE PHASE 2 

SILICA 

20 

100 200 300 400 300 600 700 

TIME SEC'S 

-ffilieREFP SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

sr

. 

SPECIAL, HA3)LING 4 

coNcLuszorls 

o RIOT HOLE • 

LACK PERFORMANCE 

COMPLEX_ 

NOT ADAPTABLE TO CERVIT 

WEIGHT - BASELINE. 

BO r BAY DOORS 

LACK PERFORMANCE 

LOUVERS AND DOORS REDUNDANT 

COMPLEX (DOOR CUTTINGS) 

IS ADAPTABLE TO CERVIT 

WEIGHT A -100 LBS. 

o LOUVERS 

STATIC PERFORMANCE LOSS 

BEST LONG-TIME PERFORMANCE 

SIMPLE 

ADAPTABLE TO CERVIT 

WEIGHT A 1.150 LBS. 

-3BeR.ST- SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

ef SPECIAL HANDLING 

CONCLUSION 

o TWO OPTIONS 

ROLLING APERTURE 

LOUVERS + SLIDING MASK 

LOUVERS + MASK BETTER PERFORMANCE 

BETTER CER-VIT CONFIGURATION , 

o PROGRAM IMPACT OF CONFIGURATt ON SWITCH NOT 

DETERMINED 

SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

4 ' 

TOCIINICAL 

o ALIGN I.IMI101-GIMBAL TO COA 

EZ3TITUTE En LOUVER DEAIGN 

• 

o IETZ'iTITUTE GE PITCH MASK DESIGN 

o USTITUTE ACTION REQUIRED TO ENSURE THAT CERVIT AND 

ULE ARE SUITABLE BACKUPS TO FUSED SILICA 

RE-DIRECT DAC TO PROVIDE SHORTED STRUCTURAL 

BLOW-OFF DOOR 

-SISCAIST- SPECIAL HANDLING 
READOUT SYSTEM 

-SE6&ET SPECIAL HANDLING 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 201.5_.,., 

-SeGAST- SPECIAL HANDLING 
RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

GLICRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

BASE • kkT I PROGRAM 

CBS SCANNER 

BTL WIDEBAND 

DAC INTEGRATION INTO VEHICLE 

L&Beitel" SPECIAL HANDLING ' 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

-SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

. SYSTEM CAPABILITY 

100 LP/MM SCANNER CAPABILITY FOR 110 LP/ MM INPUT 

Z - 50 MC CHANNELS 

POINTING ANTENNA 

160 FRAMES/DAY (2" X 6") 'READOUT 

50 FRAMES/ DAY PROCESSED FILM 

AUTOMAT IC AFTER EDITING 

0 ROUTINE TARGETS 24 HOURS 

SPECIAL INTEREST TARGETS - UP TO 12 HOURS 

4E6R-E4F SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 -&66iter SPECIAL HANDLING 

• • 

SELECTED BY CREW 

) 

Fort MAT 

DATA BLOCK READOUT DURING SLEW 

VARIABLE 
7 . 

NROARPROVED FOR__ 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

-ftett-EIL SPECIAL HANDLING 

o EXISTING 

2 STORY BUILDING 

• 22' ANTENNA 

o BTL COST INCLUDES 

• RECEIVER • TRANSMITTER 

CONSOLES 

• ANTENNA ANTENNA DRIVE 

o CBS COST INCLUDES 

REPRODUCER 

• PROCESSOR 

OPERATIONS 

- 15 MAN/ MONTH 

-SeeR-B11SPECIAL HANDLING 
- NIRO ARPROVED-FORRELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

StrIrGffeer% SPECIAL HANDLING . 

SYSTEM INSTALLATION 

SUBSYSTEM ABOVE 

TOTAL BASELJNE 

o WEIGHT 

SCANNER/READOUT 4310 431 

- CBS SCANNER (1620) 

- BTL READOUT (1730) 

- DACO INSTAL. (960) 

EK FILM & PROCESSOR 2220 0 

o - POWER 

PEAK - 530W 

AVERAGE 30W 

o COST $16-25M 

-SPECIAL HANDLING 

0 

$0. 5-9. SM 
-NRO-APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

NV -EtEeftef1/4SPECIAL HANDLING 

SYSTEM INSTALLATION 

o WEIGHT 

SUBSYSTEM 

TOTAL 

ABOVE 

BASELINE 

SCANNER/READOUT 431# 431# 

- OBS SCANNER (162#) 

BTL READOUT (1739) 

DACO INSTAL. (969) 

EK FILM & PROCESSOR 222# 

POWER 

PEAK 530W 0 

AVERAGE 30W 

COST $16-25M $0. 5-9. 5M 

SfrreArb-T---SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

-4BC-11.6412-SPECIAL HANDLING 

COSTS 

CONTRACTOR SPO/ . 

ROM AEROSPACE 

CBS 6M 15M 

BTL .5M 5M Ec 

DAC 4M 4M 

GROUND IM 1 M 

$16M* $25. M 

r 

AUSTERE PROGRAM 

MINIMUM INTERFACES 

NO TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 

. NO WEIGHT REDUCTION PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT 

NO RELIABILITY/ LIFE IMPROVEMENT 

-&BeR-Egit SPECIAL HANDLING 
NFtD APPROVE6TOR - 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

T• SPECIAL HANDLING 

MOL BASELINE RECONNAISSANCE DATA RETURN PROVISIONS 

END OF MISSION DATA RETURN 

FOUR DATA RETURN CAPSULES (DRC) IN GEMINI It 

(TOTAL CAPACITY 230 LBS. 9" FILM) 

o INTERMEDIATE DATA RETURN 

• ONE DATA RE-ENTRY VEHICLE (DRV) WITH SPACE PROVISIONS 

FOR A SECOND DRV 

(CAPACITY 60 LBS. 9" FILM PER DRV) 

• FILM READOUT SYSTEM USING A WIDEBAND DATA LINK 

(UP TO 160 2" X 6" FRAMES PER DAY) 

ti 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

USES FOR INTERMEDIATE DATA nr,Turthr 

o FOR A-SURVEILLANCE MISSION 

TARGET RE-PROGRAMMING 

SENSOR PERFORMANCE. ANALYSIS 

PROVIDES TIME URGENT RECONNAISSANCE INFORMATION 

(CRISIS, TACTICAL, ARMS C=TROL, ETC. ) 

FOR A TECHNICAL INTELLIGENCE SON 

- TARGET RE-PROGRAMMING 

SENSOR PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS 

o FOR THE MOL/DORIAN MISSION 

- ALL OF THE ABOVE 

Ee ft- SPECIAL HANDLING 
TIME URGENT RECON DAILY BASIS 

..01FORMATION 

ONCE OR TVTICE 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 9Bei+€4- , SPECIAL HANDLING 

COMPARISON OF READOUT AND DRV FOR DATA RETURN 

FUNCTIONS READOUT * DRV 

TARGET RE-PROGRAMMING 

DURING MISSION 

DAILY BASIS -• ON FIRST. TIMEX 

TARGETS 

SENSOR PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE DAILY BASIS 

ANALYSIS DURING MISSION 

AFTER FIRST 

WEEK 

k ALL FUNCTIONS COULD BE PERFORMED TO SOME EXTENT BY FLIGHT. CREW 

MONITORING SECONDARY FILM 

SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 T SPECIAL HANDLING 

OPTIONS 

o DRV ONLY 

▪ DETAILED ANALYSIS OF FIRST VIEEft PRIMARY RECORD 

60-LB PAYLOAD CAPACITY ABOVE GEMINI LIMIT (Z30 LDS) 

SAVE $15.51t4 CURRENTLY DEFERRED FOR READOUT 

o READOUT ONLY 

• WEEKLY - PRIMARY RECORD SAMPLE 

DAILY - 1 FRAME/TARGET - SECONDARY RECORD 

▪ NET WEIGHT INCREASE OF 81 LBS 

NET COST INCREASE $4. SM (EXCESS OVER DEFERRED ItEADOLIT 

COSTS MINUS CREDIT FOR DRV DELETION) 

o DRV AND READOUT 

'WEIGHT INCREASE OF 431 LBS 

COST INCREASE OF $9.5M ABOVE CURRENT BUDGET 

• NEITHER DRV NOR READOUT 

▪ WEIGHT DECREASE OF 731 LBS 

• COST DECREASE OF $30+ M 

-9Beft4' T- SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

"Melte?' SPECIAL HANDLING 

CONCLUSIONS 

.0 THE READOUT SYSTEM AND DRV ARE OVERLAPPING 

ONE OR BOTH SHOULD BE ELIMINATED TO REDUCE 

COSTS AND VEHICLE WEIGHTS 

IF INTERMEDIATE DATA RETURN ON A NEAR REAL-TIME 

BASIS IS A DOD REQUIREMENT, THE DRV SHOULD DE 

ELIMINATED 

0. IF INTERMEDIATE DATA RETURN IS NOT A DOD REQUIREMENT. 

THE COSTS, WEIGHTS AND COMPLEXITY OF NEITHER THE 

READOUT SYSTEM NOR THE DRV ARE JUSTIFIED 

-.66GIRST- SPECIAL HANDLING 

Thi 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

RECOMMENDATION 

IF A REQUIREMENT EXISTS FOR INTERMEDIATE 

DATA RETURN, THEN READOUT IS RECOMMENDED 

AS PROVIDING THE MOST, FLEXIBILITY. AND 

OVERALL COST EFFECTIVENESS' 

SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELF E 1 JULY 201.5 

,CHANGES IN NASA PROGRAM SINCE MSFEB OF 19 SEP66: 

1. MOL WILL BE BILLED FOR 

INTEGRATION COSTS 

3. RENDEZVOUS WITH MAPPING 

& SURVEY SYSTEM 

2. CHANGE TO CLUSTER M 

, 

FOR SA-209, 210, (211 and 212) 

WITH LAUNCH CHANGE FROM 

APR 68 TO JUNE - JULY 68 

1. ADDITIONAL COSTS WHICH ARE 

SOMEWHAT OPEN —ENDED 

- ADDITIONAL CONTRACTUAL PERIOD 

• RELAX HARDWARE DELIVERY. 

SOMEWHAT 

• MOL LEARNING. OUTCOME DELAYED 

- NEW LOCATION' FOR EXPER I MENTS 

IN MULTIPLE DOCKING ADAPTER 

- EXTENDED DURATION QUALITI CATION 

- MULTIPLIES MA NA GEMENT 

COMPLEXITY 

- WITHDRAWAL OF CONS I DERATION OF 

MOL ASTRONAUT PARTICIPATION 
CONTINUE PARTICIPATION IN NASA PROGRAM. 

REDUCE SCOPE AND FUNDIkG OF MOL EXPERIMENTS. 

WITHDRAW MOL PARTICIPATION FROM 

PROGRAIVL 

NASA 

WITHDRAW ALL USAF PARTICIPATION FROM NASA 

PROGRAM, 

N 

R 

0 APPROVED FOR 

LEASE 1 JULY 201 

ALTERNATIVES FOR MOL PARTICIPATION 
RO APPROVED FOR 

ELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

■ 7------ 

i 

FACTORS FAVOR ING CONTINUED PARTICIPATION 

• EARLY EXERCISE OF MOL PECULIAR EQUIPMENT IN EXTENDED SPACE 

MISSION. ) 

• DEVELOPMENT OF. PROCEDURES FOR ASTRONAUT MOBILITY, EQUIPMENT 

MAINTENANCE AND TIMELINES, FOR MOL 

STIMULATION OF DAC TO' PAY MORE ATTENTION TO HUMAN FACTORS 

AND 'EARLY PRODUCTION OF PROTOTYPE MOLECULAR S IEVE. 

• DEMONSTRATION OF COOPERATION BETWEEN NASA AND DOD 

(COMMITMENTS TO NASA MAY BE DIFFICULT TO. W ITH DRAW).. 

* EXPER IMENTS FEW OF MANY, BUT TO DATE TREATED BY NASA 

WITH HIGH PRIORITY AND SCHEDULE FLEXIBILITY. 

SPECIFIC MOL CREW CONDITIONING AND MEASUREMENT HARDWARE 

AND PROCEDURES BEING INTEGRATED INTO JOINT NASMAFAMD 

B 10ASTRONAUTICS EFFORT. 

• APOLLO APPLICATION PROGRAM IS REPORTED TO BE APPROVED BY 

BOB AND THE PRESIDENT AT A LEVEL OF $400 TO $450 MILLION 

IN FY 68. 
FACTORS AGAINST PARTICIPATION 

, SAVES $3 TO $4 MILLION...FOR BASELINE MOL. 

* DISTRACTS MOL )MANAGEMENT ATTENTION AND MANPOWER. 

INFORMATION ON EXTENDED MANNED SPACE MISS IONS WILL 

BE AVAILABLE WITHOUT ,PARTICIPATION. 

BAS IC APOLLO PROBLEMS MAY DELAY4 OR CANCEL ORB I TAL 

WORKSHOP MISSION. 

• SCHEDULE DELAYS LIMIT. LEARNING UTILITY TO MOL 

MANAGEMENT. COMPLEXITY WITH CLUSTER MISSION-, \ • • 

• MAPPING AND SURVEY• SYSTEM TEST IN EARTH ORB IT POSES 

POLICY, PROBLEMS FOR DOD PARTICIPATION. 

• POOR EXPERIENCE FROM DOD PARTICIPATION IN GEMINI . . 

• AF PARTICIPATION STRENGTHENS NASA'S ENTRY INTO S PACE 

-STATION MISSIONS. 

PUBLIC INFORMATION PROBLEMS REGARDING NASA SUPPORT OF :VIOL. 

NR. APPROVED FOR 

RE EASE 1 JULY 2 
NUCLEAR RAULSION 

GALACTIC X....:RAY MAPPING 

MULITBAND TERRAIN PHOTOGRAPHY 

flzA1.111 

N 0 APPROVED FOR 

R LEASE 1 JULY 5 

S!..A 209/210 - CANDIDATE EXPERDIENTS ,

ENGINEERING TECHNOAY 

m4o1 

M402 

M469 

M479 

M486 

.* m487 

- m488 

m489 

M492 

m493 

MEDICAL 

mo18 

* M051 

*:m052 

mo53 

mo54 

* M055 

LUNAR MAPPING PHOTOGRAPHY (MSS) 

(EAR ITH ORBITAL QUALIFICATION) 

ORBITAL. WORKSHOP 

ST-12l. 11EyIGVAL & DISASSEMBLY 

ZERO-GFLAMUILITY 

ASIROMUT EVA EQUIPMENT 

HABITABILITY/CREW QUAR1.c.AS 

HIGH PRESSURE GAS EXPULSIN 

HEAT EXCHANGER SERVICE 1 

TUBE JOINING IN- SPACE 

ELECTRON BEAM WELDING 

VECTORCARDIOGRAM 

METABOLIC-ACTIVITY 

CARDIOVASCULAR FUNCTION ASSESSMENT 

BONE & MUSCLE CHANGES 

HU=VESITBULn2 FUNCTION 

NEUROLOGICAL STUDY (EEG) 

TEE & MOTION STUDIES. 

1002 

TO17 

T020 

- T021 

P022 

T023 

nA7TJAL NAVIGATION SIGHTINGS 

MEIE320ID IMPACT & EP.OSION 

JET SHOES 

METEOROID VELOCITY 

HEAT PIPE 

SURFACE ADSORBED MALERIALS 

SCIi~a ^. SCE 

8009 

5027 

8965 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

D017 CO2 REDUCTION (AID) 

D018 INTEGRATED MAINTENANCE (MOL) 

. D019 SUIT DONNING & SLEEP STATION 

EVALUATION (MOL) 

D020 ALTERNATE RESTRAINTS. EVALUATION NOL), 

D021 EXPANDABLE AIRLOCK TECHNOLOGY (RTD) 

D022 EXPANDABLE STRUCTURE FOR RECOVERY (RTD 

GROUND SIMULATION- OF BICEEDICAL EFFECTS OF WEIGHTLESSNESS TEAM WILL BE SAME POR MOL. 
NRO APPROV D FOR 

RELEAS JULY 2015 

FACTORS AFFECTING SCOPE. REDUCTION 

* DELETION OF MOLECULAR SIEVE SAVES MORE THAN 

$1 MILLION AND, EASES SCHEDULE PROBLEM SOMEWHAT, 

BUT IS SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION1OF OBJECTIVES. 

ACTIVE PARTICIPATION BY /VIOL SPO AND DAC IS 

RETAINED TO ASSURE MORE THOROUGH LEARN ING AND. 

INFORMATION TRANSFER. 
RO APPROVED FOR 

ELEASE 1 JU 015 

RECOMMENDATION 

CONTINUE FULL PARTICIPATION ON THE 

CONDITION„THAT NASA PROVIDE INTEGRATION 

COSTS OR AGREE TO FIRMIFIXED PRICE. 

DOD SUPPORT OF THE POLICY ON INTEGRATION 

'.,COSTS IS REQUIRED. 

••■••••■■■•• 
1"..K 

, • 

first• 

,aver e. 

- 

1 

Ae-411 re .01 Wiry 

z2e,teewe/ 7*# 54'4 

NRO AP 

RELE 

VED FOR 

1 JULY 2015 —9LaeRS2V SPECIAL HANDLING - 

//".44/4/4e) --->-,4e/roxi-evze Clv.v.v4w.e5zo4v 

9is 

72meeveg 4,e;41 re Ae r- ---romA/Acs 

41:edesi____•gete: 

• ae.elvew 

• rAvoq&gedr.fgt 71.44/..vrs. 

• .40,r47i4! 

• 4;142Y414111 

• g•Aev 

• Arlo 

07€./00APox 

teg. AL/L_ At• - 

/1.44A46(4&42. 

le/7cz4i4 7"/c 

gs=_••70P_ 024P AfAlgrals__Lat 

—SeGRET- SPECIALHANDLING p 00.47 
NRO AP OVED FOR. 

RELEfXSE 1 JULY 2015 'Melt-ET-SPECIAL HANDLING 

FLIGHT 6 be 7 ASSEMBLY PROCEDURES A /M 

Le N s -/65 

4 ' 

0 STRUCTURE OMISSIONS PRIOR TO "BIRD CAGE" ASSEMBLY 

0 TRANSFER TUNNEL 

O DRV TUBE 

0 ACQUISITION SCOPES AND FAIRINGS 

0 OMISSIONS IN "BIRD CAGE" ASSEMBLY 

O ALL VISUAL OPTICS 

O DISPLAYS AND CONTROLS 

O VOICE SYSTEM 

O LIFE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND CREW RESTRAINTS 

O ADDITIONS TO LAB MODULE 

0 SUPPORT STRUCTURE FOR rum._ trim= 

O FILM CHUTE SEALS 

0 SUPPORT MODULE WIRING HARNESSES 

O MATE SUPPORT MODULE 

—66G146-T-SPECIAL HANDLING 
OCT. '69 

MARCH '70 

MAY '70 

JUNE '70, 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

3, 

SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

FLIGHT 6BASELINE SCHEDULE 

l-v15ls - 

MONTHS Tia.a., LAUNCH 

18 

EVENT 

• FAB STARTS 

STRUCTURE AND BIRDCAGE 

• ASSEMBLY 

LOADING OF BIRDCAGE AND 

UNPR E SS URIZ ED SECTION 

• JOINING 

BIRDCAGE AND STRUCTURE 

UNPRESS. TO PRESSURIZED 

F • C/O 

• MATE 

LM/MM 

SM/LV 

• C/0 

• PREP. AND SHIP 

• VAFB 

0 LAUNCH 

START DATE SPAN/MONTHS 

APRIL '69 6 

JULY '70 1-1/2 

AUG. '70 1/2 

AUG. '70 

OCT. '70 

12 

.5 

4 

2-1/2 

0 

3ECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APP ciFoR 

RELE 1 JULY 2015 

te'NS 1141 —Th 

360 

320 

280 

= 240 U 

5 200 

O 

Lj 160 

120 

(-) 

80 

0 

360 320 280 240 200 160 120 

PLANNED TIME TO LAUNCH 

LABORATORY CONVERSION TIME 
\ I 

(MANNED VERSION) 

MM REC &, INSP 

MM WT •& CC b a 

,LM CONVERSION i 53/ 1 

SM ASSY V I ec=1 

t 

LM ASSY & coi 

Ell 

SM/LM/MM MATE ** 

SM/LM OV/MPSS C/O 

DECISION POINT 

15 

NR 

EASE 1 JULY 2015 

-,6 T- SPECIAL HANDLING • 15035 

MINIMUM RESPONSE TIME 1-* 100 WORKING DAYS * 

v3K. DAYS 

a. 

17 1 

OV WT :& CG 

& I ORDNANCE 

was 

*117 CALENDAR DAYS, ASSUMING 6 WORKING DAYS PER WEEK 

* *SM. LM. & MM ARE MATED BEFORE C/O 

.1 146 eALENDAR DAIS (To-r-Pt4.) ZWIc SLIP 

SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

AT %-%t3 

• • 

INSTALL ORDNANCE 

PREP FOR & SHIP 

VAr'e 
N 

LEASE 1 JULY 2015 1-0/15 /5-5' 

3ECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

4 - 

CONVERSION FLIGHTS 6 AND 7 TO MIA . 

0 MANNED PECULIAR EQUIPMENT NOT PRESENTLY ORDERED 

O FOR FLIGHTS 6 AND 7. 

O MOST MANNED EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE ON SIL FOR FLIGHT 7. 

O FLIGHT 6 INITIALLY SCHDULED AM/FAILURE TO COMPLETE 

30-DAY MANNED MISSION 

O DECISION TO CONVERT MADE DURING FLIGHT 5. 

O #6 ON SHIPPING DOCK 

O FLIGHT 6 DELAYED 7 TO 10 MONTHS - BASELINE OF 

MANNED EQUIPMENT. 

O CONVERSION OPTION - DEGRADED RELIABILITY 

SUMMARY OF COST INCREASE 

FLIGHT #6 $ 63M 

FLIGHT 07 $ 43 M 

TOTAL $103M 

CECREY SPECIAL HANDLING 
NR 

EASE 1 JULY 2015 

OECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

S 

4 

FLIGHT 6 CONVERSION OPTION 

0 FLIGHT 6 PLANNED AS MAM 

0 OPTION TO CONVERT TO AM 

' 0 LAUNCH DELAY FUNCTION OF CONVERSION DECBION.DATE 

0 HARDWARE AVAILABLE FOR CONVERSION 

O SUPPORT MODULE 

O AUTOMATIC FILM HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

O STRUCTURE MODS, 

0 ADDITIONAL HARDWARE REQUIRED OVER CURRENT BASELINE 

O GEMINI 

O MANNED PECULIAR LM EQUIPMENT 

DRV t4 LAUNCHER TUBE 

•O ACQUISITION SCOPES AND FAIRINGS 

0 VISUAL OPTICS/DISPLAYS AND CONTROLS 

0 VOICE SYSTEM/LIFE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT/CREW RESTRAINTS 

0 ADDITIONAL PLANNING, ENGINEERING, FACTORY TIME REQUIRED TO 

ACCOMODATE DUAL OPTION., 

CECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 
NR PROVED-MR- - - 

LEASE 1 JULY 2015 u11-1.5-i 

COST OF AM OPTION - FLIGHT fb 

O FLIGHT 06 PROGRAMMED AS A M /AM FLIGHT 

O DECISION TO FLY AM MADE 4 MONTHS PRIOR TO LAUNCH 

10 MONTHS PRIOR TO LAUNCH 

O FLIGHT #7 UNCHANGED - 

O MANNED PECULIAR EQUIPMENT NOT PRESENTLY ORDERED FOR FLIGHT f 6 

O SUMMARY OF COST INCREASE 

4 MONTHS BEFORE LAUNCH** 

10 MONTHS BEFORE LAUNCH* 

HARDWARE 

TOTAL PROCU RE ht1ENT 

S9. OM 32. OM 

42. OM 32. OM 

CONVERSION 

27.0M 

10.0MSPARE

* 

AM 

77. OM 

S b. OM 

A INCLUDES #6 AS A WAN! FLIGHT NO SCHEDULE SLIPPAGE 

A INCLUDES #6 AS A M/ AM FLIGHT - 7 MONTHS SLIP OF LAUNCH DATE 
Nr. APPROVED FOR 4.4...),Li$ --""\\ 

ELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

• IMPACT ON FISCAL YEAR FUNDING 

A • COST INCREASES OVER BASELINE 

1. 

FISCAL YEAR 

FROM AM ---410. 24/ AM 

FLIGHT 16 

HARDWARE PROCUREMENT 

CONVERSION 

FLIGHT 07 

HARDWARE PROCUREMENT 

CONVERSION 

-) 

1968 1969 1970 1971 

34.0 

18.0 

16.0 

30.0 

1972 TOTAL 

._. 

-I.() 6.0 :,.,.4 .23.0 63.0 

36.0 

27.0 

45.0 

41=11.............r■IP.MIM 

30. 0 

13.0 

,, 2.0 

4.0 

. 

16.0 

7.0 

15.0 

10.0 

5.0 

20.0 

10.0 

2. FROM M/AM --o• Ali FLT .6 

FLT 16 TO M/AM 

HARDWARE PROCUREMENT 

4 MOS BEFORE LAUNCH 

CONVERSION TO AM 

10 MOS BEFORE LAUNCH 

CONVERSION TO AM 

2.0 10.0 20. 0 - 38.0 

33.0 

S9.0 

42.0 

10.0 

2.0 

2.0 

10.0 

21.0 

20.0 

36.0 

27.0 

4.0 

11.0 

13.0 

16.0 

25.0 

2.0 ' 3.0 S.0 

3. 

4 

SPARE AM - 4 MONTHS 

HARDWARE PROCUREMENT 

SPARE AM - 10 MONTHS 

HARDWARE PROCUREMENT 

4, 

2.0 30.0 45.0 77.0 

4S.0 

54.0 

 24.0 

,..-....-■

,.^*,_... . 

2.0 

20.0 

20.0 

25.0 

34.0 

10.0 14.0 
• DECISION BEFORE LAUNCH 

4 MONTHS 10)40 NT HS 

3.0 

2. 0 

2.0 

2.a 1.0 

$10. OM 

. 32.0 

$42. 014 

$27. 014 

32.0 

$59. OM 

6.0 

3.0 

10. 0 

6.0 

SPARE AM 

24.0 

21.0 

$45 . 014 

••••■•■••••■••.INIONOR 

$450M 

O APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 1-1,5- 1 3 -5 

CONVERSION COSTS 

CONVERSION PLANNING C, TECHNIQUE 

CONVERSION TOO LING & EQUIPMENT 

CO NVE RS 10 N LABOR 

REPEAT ASSEMBLY & CHECKOUT 

OPERATIONS, SOFTWARE, LAUNCH, 

• RECOVERY 

SUBTOTAL CONVERSION 

TOT AL COST 1REASE 

INCREASED COST OF AM OPTION - FLIGHT 06 

FLIGHT 06 A 

ADDITIONAL HARDWARE BASELINE B AS E LI NE 43. M / AM 

AM FOR M/AM OR ANL OR 

GEMINI II ISM 4.0 19.0; 23.0 

DACO (DISPLAYS. CONTROLS, 

STRUCTURE, FAIRINGS) 29.5' 6.0 

PAY LOAD (DISPLAYS, CONTROLS, 

ATS , RV's) 

■ 

I 1 ■ - 24.0 S . 0 29.0 

OTHER 2.7 1.5 4.2 

TITAN III 21.0 0.5 21.5 

• BASELINE $51.214 + $32. OM a $113. 214 
NRO APP •VED FOR 

RELEA 1 JULY 2015 

M01..,)AfittflEMEN.T. MEETING 

AGENDA 

MORNING SESSION - Program Management, Meeting 

AFTERNOON SESSION - Technical Report on Completed 

Studies 

• 

,TYPE OF BRIEFING 

Information / Updating 

o Action, Approval. Requested 
NRO APPR ED FOR 

RELEAS 1 JULY 2015 . 

AGENDA ITEMS 

1) TIME - COST OPTIONS 

PURPOSE: INDICATE PROGRAM DECISION POINT FOR ADJUSTING 

TO FY 68 FUND LEVELS. 

MANAGEMENT ACTION: AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH 

BASELINE PROGRAM UNTIL EARLY 

FY 1968. OBTA IN A DX PRIORITY 

FOR PROGRAM. 

2) PROCUREMENT SCHEDULE FOR CONTRACTUAL DEFERRED ITEMS 

PURPOSE: PRESENT CURRENT STATUS AND PLANS FOR DEF IN I TI Z I NG 

CONTRACTURALLY DEFERRED I TEMS. 

MANAGEMENT ACTION: INFORMATION AND SCHEDULE 

ACCEPTANCE 

3) SATURN IVB 

PURPOSE: REVIEW CUB RENT 4•;TATUS OF MOL PROGRAM PARTI C I PATION 

IN NASA PROGRAM.. 

MANAGEMENT AC110;,: 'cTIALI DATION OF COURSE OF ACTION 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

4 

4) WIDE BAND READOUT 

PURPOSE: REVIEW OF CURRENT PLANS FOR A MOL READOUT SYSTEM. 

MANAGEMENT ACTION : APPROVE RECOMMENDED AP F ROACH. 

5) THERMAL DOORS 

PURPOSE: DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED DESIGNS. 

MANAGEMENT ACTION: INFORMATION BRIEFING. 

6) ACOUSTIC TESTING 

PURPOSE: REVIEW THE REQUIREMENT FOR ACOUSTIC TESTING IN THE 

MOL PROGRAM. 

MANAGEMENT ACTION: DISCUSS ION OF THE REQUIREMENT 

— AND GUIDANCE ON APPROACH TO 

BE TAKEN. 

7) EXECUTIVE SESSION: DESIGNATED INDIVIDUALS. 

Sccret I Byeman I Dorian 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELE 

8) REPORT•ON COMPLETED STUDIES 

a. IMAGE VELOCITY SENSOR 

b. SUPPORT MODULE STUDIES 

c. ACQUISITION AND TRACKING.' SCOPE 

d. SIMULATION STUDIES AND PLANNING 

MRPOSE: INFORMATION BRIEFING 

MANAGEMENT ACTION: TO BE DETERM I NED. 

Stmt./ Byeman I Dorian • 

1 
N 

ELEASE 1 JULY 2015 (71 

//e/ ,(1C./fre__ 
..NRO APPROVED FOF 

RELEASE 1 JULY 201 

CONSTRAINS ON OPERATION 

• 

NO PROVISION FOR CHANGES 

AUTHORITY NEEDED FOR EXPENDITURE LEVEL 

FUNDING 

TIGHT SCHEDULE LIMITS RESEQUENCING 

WORK 

FPI CONTRACTS LIMITS SPO 

REPROGRAMMING COSTS MONEY 
MD/Yr/at/ i&it/P//t/6- k7Eigifl&--/t/rs 

re,e7avie2/ra, -,sr -t rbW al.(4 

4 
( NRO APPROVED FOR 

REL ASE 1 JULY 2015 

,4e7 iv/rths? 

,v,e04,1, -a,/yF6- 

6Ey6- 4e7 Aror 5r,e=r/t/E2p44/tf 

62Y7 =T AMA/ 

51/AwAredavre /44t/re 

L4,V 

c.14/z7Ar eeivrz's- CG'S (4(4s/ -7774=v 

ealtri/VaeP /101f/ S761 or eaVr,486, 

46,66'4 Zeri/w- AMA/ 

- r/t4/8- 04/) 
moetiz_t_i bEe 7;4,v 

9 00 

/4 30 

• . NRO APPROVED FOR 

.RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

G761/17Zeetero Aer/viriEs° 

51,0(e0/1/re /VEC-- ggieWP-3/44k*E* 

SfRaA/ITZ W,V1P-06-4/e'64 -7A- rlis 

•6,ea/dinYetzvic //146Vre "7"& s'fro - 

(A4e - Pr4v/v//r/ r'w.emages' e/teK) 

(4/-1/Das, "4/64orgr/eyvel, - -xefr 

a'apecrer ter-.44' 

/4//r/41.. &Vow/sway pf A--//v/vveme... 

it'EA70,C7rOfeAffilValc-e/4 PAT& 
.NRO APPROVED FOR #7/476,767 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

//1/rFGA'Are-47 A-MALYS/5' 77-AM 

116771/lrlb-g: 

• srAraS 

• PvieepA?th-isi ze7x/v77FfeArtaiv 4 

AtVAGV51S 

• rit'AcKM,G-- 

• fivre2c,erry 

• TgAP- s'-rue,//S • 

• att>pAre 

et7/77444. W06/ 45X_Oett:g(e40S-1<crefif•S) 

do r 

SellEbutEg 

reew PtkpAVielt4454.6" saers: • 

• WArg 

• dogr. 

• 15V1,6 er eeitimes 

• 4/04/Zee- ,.efiv6-7ze-cratw/t4 
Ne-dzi/vg 4v4/4415•46- 

ilif4/t/ereqe_ 414/W6-itiMir- 

°PoPverg AP-SC 

• NRO APPROVED FOR 

i.RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 
CONCEPTS OF, OPERATION 

MINIMIZE EARLY YEARS FUNDING 

VALIDATE CONTRACTOR I S TIME 

PHASED REQUIREMENTS 

EXPEND I TURE LEVEL FUNDING 

o MAINTAIN BALANCED PROGRAM 

TRACK EXPEND 1 TURES (CLOSELY 

o RECOMMEND REPROGRAMM 1 NG I F: 

- PROGRAM BECOMES UNBAL.ANCED•• 

EXPEND I TURES BREAK TRACK 

• 

•NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 SJA0 Po 6.7 RE.WEA) 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

ASE 1 JULY 201 

SPECIAL HANDLING 

irrEeftET SPECIAL HANDLING 

SUPPORT MODULE 

EXTENDED LIFE•STUDY 

CCORET SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

ZOHS- /55 

SPECIAL HANDLING 

STUDY OBJECTIVES 

O FEASIBILITY OF EXTENDED)LIFE. AM. 

O PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF SUPPORT MODULE. 

O RECOMMENDED BASE LINE CHANGES. 

0 EXTENDED LIFE GROUND TEST PROGRAM RELIABILITY EVALUATION. 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

0.1/-15 -/55 

SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

STUDY ROLES & RESPONSIBILIT 

o DACO STRUCTURE 

EXPENDABLES 

OVER ALL INTEGRATION SM 

o EK 

• 

FILM HANDLING 

o ALL SYSTEM SEGMENTS 

—&FIGR-EM SPECIAL HANDLING 
FILM REQUIREMENTS/NO. OF RiVIS 

. WEIGHTS/LIFE/INCLINATIONS 

. LA B/DR V PRESSURE 

DRV PAYLOAD 

DESIGN IMPACT 

TESTING REQUIREMENTS 

COSTS 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

CONTENTS 

CONFIGURATIONS 

CAMERA DESIGN 

S/M ARRANGEMENTS/EXPENDABLE TANK SIZING. 

SPECIAL HANDLING 

3ECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 
&,L/5 /55 

Z..1712 

Copy a • 

if-RH-SPECIAL HANDLING SUPPORT MODULE STRUCTURE 

WO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

DRV SUPPORT' 

SPECIAL 

HANDLING 

ACTS/ PROP, 

PANEL 

AM-STROP PANEL 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

-4J-felt-Esc-SPECIAL HANDLING 

FILM WEIGHT 

* CLOUD SENSOR • Ft Lm* 

DAYS EFFECTIVENESS NO. TARGETS REQUIRED 

NO. DRIPS 

581 70# 

30 100 4 

70 

0 

6 5 

2340 

3280 

4680 8 

40 loo 3120. 

70 4370 

O 6240 

S 4 

7 

0* 

10 

60 100 4 680 

70 6550. 

O 9360 

156 PER/DAY 6 FRAMES/TARGET. 

0$ NOT FEASIBLE. 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

4 E:ECRET SPECIAL HANDLING coNS 

CONFIGURATION WEIGHT VS DURATION 

29 • 

ITARGET"•90 INCLINATION —11/4 

8 28 

0 

1:14 

'1. 27 to 

0 

E-4 26 

£4 . 

U 25 

.10 

MEI 

24 

21 

30 

TARGEI97 _INCLINATION 

I 

I 

I 

I I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

2400# CON'1 INC: ENCIC 1 

100% EF'. CLOUD SENSOR 

ASSUMED FOR 60–DAY MISSION. 

I 

35 40 45 50 

MISSION DURATION 0-%0 DAYS 

NO. OF DRV'S 

8 

55 60 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

-88GRAW-SPECIAL HANDLING 1-06/S -155 

2 FSIA AND 5 PSIA PRESSURE TRADE OFF 

2 PSIA 

(MOD. TO LM1 

MODIFY PRESSURE REGULATORS 

MODLFY VENT VALVES 

ADD ADDITIONAL VENT VALVE 

MODIFY CABIN FANS 

5 PSLA 

(MOD. TO DR. V) 

REDESIGN COVERS 

MODIFY OUTFLOW. RELIEF VALVE 

LOWER ROM COST 

-

SEreiterSPECIAL HANDL/No 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 11 

SPECIAL HANDLING 

tuA 04UTE./DRV ALIGNAAENYT METI400 ROUGH DRAFT 

E Cui T 

/v41 ,/Jet "IA .7" 0/ - 'TAO 70 °/.,gy.A.A • 

CAV MOOMTING 

it.t.A•CHuTE./Dtkv 

RE.PERUXE. STRUCTURE OUTER 

EK ThICE-UP ASSEMBLY 

COTTER/SEALER 

DAT N CArStit.E. 

SPECIAL HANDLING 
NIRO APPROVED FOR 

. RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

.VARIABLES 

0 ORBITAL LIFE 

O 300. - 550# FILM WEIGHT 

O 58 - 70# R/V CAPACITY 

O 6, 8 OR 10 R/V S 

O CUT AND WRAP OR CUT k SPLICE 

O 2 OR 5 PSI LAB PRESSURIZATION 

0 ONE OR TWO PLATEN CAMERA 

O INCLINATION 

Co 

COMMENT 

60 DAYS FEASIBLE 

FEASIBLE 

EITHER FEASIBLE/70# RECOMMENDED 

8 OR LESS 

CUT AND WRAP- . 

EITHER FEASIBLE/5 PSI RECOMMENDED 

EITHER FEASIBLE/ONE RECOMMENDED 

.90 - 97° FEASIBLE 

SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

• 

LY 

CECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

Gel HS / 

SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

EXTENDED LIFE IMPACTS 

• IDENTIFIED IN STUDY AS POTENTIAL WEAROUT PROM...EMS. 

DACO 3 ITEMS - BEARINGS - SEPARATOR PUMPS 

GE - 14 ITEMS ) - REDUNDANCY FOR ELECTROMECHANICAL DEVICES 

O ALL IDENTIFIED ITEMS SHOULD BE CHANGED IN MANNED BASELINE. 

O 30-DAY QUALIFICATION OF SUPPORT MODULE 

O SELECTED TESTS OF CRITICAL COMPONENTS i-c•rt. w E.AR otrr: 

0 PROJECTED RELIABILITY OF AUTOMATIC SYSTEM 

FOR 60 DAYS = .0. 35. 

SPECIAL HANDLACHO 

• 
GIJ 1-/5 - 5,S 

COST IN MILLIONS 

61 -69 

53 - 69 

4 DRY'S 

6 DRVIS 

19 

23 

SPECIAL HANDLING 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

GEM= SPECIAL HANDLING 

FLIGHTS 6 & 7 

APPROACHES 

o EXTENDED LIFE APPROACH 

- M CONFIGURATION 

2 PLATENS 

8 DRVIS 

• V CONFIGURATION 

1 OR 2 PLATENS 

8 DRY'S 

o "30" DAY - GROWTH TO 60 DAYS 

- DESIGN STRUCTURE FOR EXTENDED MISSION 

- SPACE PROVISIONS FOR EXPENDABLES AND 8 DRVIS 

- V CONFIGURATION - SINGLE PLATEN 

- 6 DRVIS 

o "30" DAY ONLY 

- •V CONFIGURATION - SINGLE PLATEN 

25 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

CDCIt DT SPECIAL• HANDLING bol/S-153 

9&-tv-etaier erVai?7,4th 

Pa-rr,-,r/rApe •‘91/, 

r t2iftezCgptgaz‘zre 

407:41 7.41.G. 0 

.aeetf&01412..itte_eci2A-4M- 

, 0°,45 .4"04140- 

7.6Beitirt $PECIAI. HANDLING 
--AJE641-E-T- SPECIAL HANDLING 

RECOMMENDATIONS 

0 "30" DAY - GROWTH TO 60 DAYS 

O MODS TO LM MINOR -- 

O IDENTIFIED WEAR OUT AND REDUNDANCY ITEMS 

O CHANGED ON MAM, 

0 OXYGEN CRYO TANKS REQUIRE 6# ADDITIONAL INSULATION 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

O CHANGED ON MAM 

O CONTINUE DESIGN EFFORT TO INSURE GROWTH CIDA4PATABILITY 

O SPACE PROVISIONS FOR EXPENDABLES. WET INTERFACE 

AND 2 DRV'S 

O BASELINE EXPENDABLES USED IN S/M 

-,SEI&FE•Fr-T- SPECIAL HANDLING 
--rtlrrAr''RrIVE17"rrfR----" 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 • 

OUTLINE 'OR MOL-SIVB EXPERIMENTS BRIEF-IWO 

I. PURPOSE: REVIEW THE STATUS OF MOL PARTICIPATION ON' 'A' Ilk: NASA SA-209 

WORKSHOP PROJECT. 

BACKGROUND 

B. MXIAGEMF..NT ACTIVITY 

CURRENT STATUS 

D. ALTERNATIVES 
ELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

. 1:3ACUOROUND: 

A. DESCRIPTION OF SA-209 ORYSITAL WORICSHOP 

DIEIT,CTZON YROM GEN ;VIP S TO EXAMINE DEsirtAMLITlf 1`,501, 

nArITXCIPATION OE3 SA-Z09 - 3 FED 66 

1. SATURN IVD AD HOC COMMITTEE - Z9 %AAA 66 

2. GUIDELMES FOR PARTICIPATION 

C. Dr..C..L;RI7TION 02 L-20,d0SED MOL EXPERIMENTS 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

NASA OBJECTIVES SAA-209 "ORBITEIO vponu6rtiop 

O EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION AND OPERATION OF LAfCZ ENVIRONMENTALLY 

• CONTROLLED VOLUME EN Et\EITZI ORBIT (SHIRT SLEEVE ENVIERONMENT) 

O DESIGN OBJECTIVE FOR 30 DAY YLIGHT 1:71TH torizra LimiT OF 14 DAYS 

O EXPAND MAN'S EtN01,7LEDZE ON HADITADILITY AND 170IIKIVO CAPABILITIES 

IN SPACE 

O ACTIVATION OF TIM S-IV SPENT STAGEIPOR MANNED OCCUP'aratICY 

O ACCOMMODATE AT LEAST 1,500 LESS OF COROLLARY EXPERIIVI=DITS 

O ACCOMPLISH OBJECTIVES MTN MINIMUM COST, MAXIMUM RELAABILITY 

AND MINIMUM IMPACT ON AnDLLo PROGRAM HARDWARE. 

* MOL PARTICIPATION 
NR PROVED FOR 

R EASE 1 JULY 2015 

0 0 C.1 D E153 

CEPORT ca®. Q339 VOLULIE 4 . $7 nme 1066 

rIBITAL comouRdwooN L VENOM 

tcollo 

cid 

krvice 

11 e t .; r- 

• \re ;c0,--1 

$7.2VIecieloz 

3. c EVA rad 

1 t 

.1 

SLA ;cool:). 

twos fr.4:4.0b 

cc t-,•!.1 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

C30C-C3 Rid 

REPORT P.10. 0559 VOLUt-le a 17 JUNE 1966 

ENPLODED VIEW 

liavries 

twarasio 

w lay (3 pisettet14 

itotth tr.,Q0 

err I:2 CP 141 IV Er LIL. 1,1 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

oraouND RULES FOR MOL AR77CrPATEON SA-209 

O NO CMANG IMPOSED ON LLO PROGRAM On 1-2AnaytuArxm 

o Dumr.rta.muT DUT 3E UNIQUE TO LE.OL D424E 

O ORBITAL TEST SUSTEFLAIBLE 

o MINCTileNAL .ASPECTS TVAT CA0T DE YEILIZZ irmar=.D 

CEIOUND *Et AX LANE 

o TALICTUL DATA MUST ItE ACQUIRED 

• 1\214N ZW1.7.r/L'C'EPATE.ON =SENTIAL TO TEST 

0. 1AN/EXpEELIt4ENT RELATIONSI-UP IMPORTANT H 

• SA-209 WILL PROVIDE ADEQUATE SHIRTSLEEVE ENVIEKIOND-MIkrr Eh% TAM 

o PARTZCEDATZON TO DE ON N 

PROGRAM EYFORT 

N-MTE.M.PERENCE BABES W!T 13AC MOIL 

O CO ' ON Prionsos2D MOL 

o PAC7.AGABLE TO i'SUITCZTE" C NCEPT 

o DATA AND DATA RETURN TO ACGODZI:ODATE "SUITCASM's CONCEPT 

o EVA ONLY TO EXTENT OF LEM HANGAR AREA 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

ARE 46J -24:11 5 

!VIOL EXPERIMENTS ON SAA-209 "ORBITING WOKIKSHOP" 

O INTEGRATED MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT 

o SELECTED EG/LS MAINTAINABLE 

COMPONENTS 

o VIOL TYPE CREW RESTRAINTS 

o TOOLS 

o MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES 

o TASK TIMELINES • 

o ILLUMINATION LEVEL 

WT VOL. leg POWER 

165 LBS. 39 F7['. 3 30 WATTS .AVE. 

O ,t1UIT-DONNING AND SLEEP STATION 15 LI3S. 6 FT. _3 

• MOL SLEEP RESTRAINT & SUIT STA. 

o SPACE SUIT ALTERNATIVES 

I/ APOLLO BLOCK 2 SUIT 

MOL SUIT ADD'L 40 LBS. 3 FT. 3 

O EVALUATION OF ALTERNATE RESTRAINTS 7 LBS. 2 FT. 

1-••— ••.-•••, -611 Liiiiirrer-AlginTAANTE-mwt-irrnwr . 

uu.-ozo) 

3 GED 

o VELCRO SLIPPERS ' 

• VELCRO CARPET 

o VELCRO STRAP-ON RESTRAINTS 

(SHIN AND THIGH) 

*VOLUME IN STOWED CONDITION DURING ASCENT FLIGHT. 
PLUMBING AND POWER MOL TOE RESTRAINT 

LINES TO AIRLOCK. 

INTERFACE 

,..N130 APPROVED FOR 

REAS 

.-4-.111 

.... „ I .

4.". 41 k' 

Al. tl A A 

A 

\--.._-'fr' -; 

\ 

/ -_ •.._.v' MOL HIP RESTRAIN. \- 

-'..„ \ 

,.. 

• FC:CIDLE. D.COL =DEM alL,;:ar • -ZO9 

EITL3.01IATED 14.1MIITMANCI7. D,1_1\.11'.-77*LIANCE T.A,f:ZS 

L'201,, • 

E:73.7.xm.C.NLIETITAL CC71.101.• 

DxirT 

COY:FC:11:;=_,73T0-1,....marrieSNANCM 

ZEN TAICS, . • 

OL 

C ^DIN HAND RAILS 
---LIELLIERR9YED FOR 

RELEAS 1 JULY 201-5--- 

ETSZCILLn 1`2:03411IX2Ear,11.T.Tri :73.1A-209 

SULT-DaNNING AND SIZIP STATIO INT -1.r4A1AtrATI9M 

k:% 

\ 5 b;00N 

t\st 
REPREOENTA'TIVE LAYOUT OZ.- CONSOLES 

SHOWING LIOL MEV/ RESTRAINTS 

CII.E17 

EtESTRAINT 

TOE RESTRAINT 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 
•• • 

• 

CI•Smi;;/ ' / 

ck'= 

• OM 

41. 

••••• 

• •••••• 

• 

7_1•41? C.) 

CL) .-0 

P77:72:1115.EIT 

C S27:-CaT P3,1\ TIM:111 

....•■• • 

, } L 

■ - —1 

' \ 2:.,..:: . .

..........1 

• ,-...___---1 

..LT'Zii_TI.DP 17] '1 

CA-SCD. 

E.)-7n.I.OACT:J C:2 AM':7',77,1/Ar73 17,0ic0-1\111:T4-7 0- 

aca P.M2211`21/ 

V.Z\-.C210 

NRO 

R ASE 1 JULY 2015 
0°`--NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 • 

Ir.. MANAGE 71 ACTIVITY 

A. MOL EXPERIMENT S PROPOSED TO LISTED ON 19 SEP bdil 

. GEN EV ANS GUIDANCE TO MOL SP 0 TRANSMIT T D F LAX APPROVAL. 

O MOL EXPERIMENTS PROGRAM ON 20 SEP 66 

C. SPO ACTIONS 30 Sa7 .• 1 JAN 67 

• 1. E ST A.D LI SI-MD • S.P 0t+SI AGE RENT TEAL'S 

Z. VOLNZ RELATION SH WITH S DT 2 AT HOU ST ON 

3. rLX,D NASA MANAGEMENT RE LATIONMIPS VET 14 MC AND 

tr.0 AND C3T UP DECISIC:7• IMItING MECHANISM 

4. NEGOTIATED ACCEPT ABLE SCHEDULE AND OTHER TCHN1CAL 

AGREEMENTS WITH MSFC AND MSC 

. SENT RFP TO CONTRACTOR ON 14 NOV 66 

6. RECEIVED PROPOSAL FROM CONTRACTOR On 15 Dre,c 66 

7. COMPLETED PRELIMINARY PROPOSAL EVALUATION 

ON 23 DEC 66 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

MILESTONE SCHEDULE FOR COROLLARY E3CPERIMENT'S INTEGUATION 

MOL EXPERIMENTS ON SAA-209 

MILESTONE DATE PER NASA PLAN . 

(\- DATE AVAILABLE FROM MOL EXPERIMENT Prtoo. 

C. 1erPMINA.,3, 

S M !! MA .

MILESTONES LI1FTFTWDJITFTP .1V111cri-4-pt 19tf1.7 11 - (1(61 

ATP FOR EXPERIMENT 

jr7,TFINITIVEFME 

MOCKUP REVIEW 

UAL DEf LCRI 

DESIGN CERTIFICATION REVIEW 

01J,A I. Tr',51.52EGMA:= 

PREDELIVERY ACCEPT PROCEDURE 

P117E:INSTALLATION ACCEPT PROCED 

nUAL TESTING COMPI-.J 

TR A ININCLEEDITRIi:S 

07,LLY..EILEIATELDITIr!.1, 

DLIVE TNG 

ACCEPTANCE IEVIEW 

D71/0I,VER TIACKUP 7 r 

PRE.LAIINC.a.c/SLEQUIP 

EXPERIMENT FLT. READINESS 

EXP.1-IDWE REQ'D FOR KSC INSTL'N 

1111111111111 
MDA 

S-IVB 

(209) 

SAA-212 

LM 

ATM 

SAA-211 

CSM 

RM 

RETURN 

CM(2 11) 

10 20 30 40 SO 60 

11 REVISIT OPERATIONS 

DOCK 211 --fi'S-IVB(209) 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

,WE-A-§r171 -

NASA PRELIMINARY FLIGHT PLAN FOR ORBITING WORKSHOP 

MISSION PROFILE AND POSSIBLE VEHICLE CONFIGURATICDN 

SM(210) 

S-IVB 

(209) 

AM 

MDA M&SS 

SOLAR 

PANELS 

ATM 

(

LM 

RM 

CSM(21 1 ) 

3001 DOCK 210 TO S-1VB/AM 

89101.Z.41.111211111111111blille1121.1•••■ DOCK 211/S-IVB ->2I2 

200 

ORM 210 

SAA-209 

S-IVB 

AM+ MDA 

SAA-210 

CSM 

0 l'...ffles....ea,ungemviamrssaf S 1.44 sic =t 

0 6 10 20 30 

INITIAL OPERATIONS 

• 1 

AM 

M&SS 

MISSION DURATION..., DAYS 

.6a7 

'7.M.,511CTe ="W. 

RETURN 

CM(210) 
v. A p i7R6 ---/ESrc57-- - — --- --- 

— 

IgELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

IV. CZKI11.11T■IT 3a'ATIV31: 

A. Pi:10205AL EVALUATION (PlYLLIMIN.A117): 

1. RZSPONSE IS ACCEPT ADLE FOR F/XED PRICE NEGOTIATION 

(AssuLazio INTERIM COVZI1AGEY LETTER COW?. ILIGT) 

2. E5EP.,!ILM.7.,NTS ARIL TECHNICALLY VALID AND IN AC COLIDAICC 

MTH OIIIODIAL GUIDEILTNES ON MOL PARTICIPA.TIO,171 

3.EL:11217',.ULT AS SLIPPED DUE TO LACE OF CONTRACTUAL COVELLAIMI 

4. CONTLIACTOZI. BID IS 3.2 MILLION 

5.. SPO ETEIL'I.T7 IS AS POLL-0175: 

• BASIC CONTRACT 2.0 

MOL SUITS .2 

INTEGRATION . 75 

CONTRACT CHANGES .2 

3. 95 

6. SAFSL GUIDELINE W 3.0 MILLION 

'..■•••■•■ 
• • • ••• • • • _ • 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

-- ......... ,.. ..., - . , ,.......,.... -----„,,.. ..., --.., ---- , .,.......„.........- ,.... , . 

Ce..17PACT U.TZ:17121,ATZ.7:1 PLL'1 Pc,44,-;‘,,e vg. 

LM& 

easfr p.h---‘-‘fivo 

CV 11 iMro • i.; i-4 .., ,:.4 ta41-- -------Z7.).. 

pep/. 6.965-67-60-40z9 /wt_ 

v.. :;;Yrec:At- c... -LI (.544 '1r L.,..e L....A.t. 4...T T ms 

1--/L-/ 

SYklt.OL 6--,44--sz-a =-rwi4(.-rt.a 4 - tY .3-- i,..1.C.I.LNIN Y Ci. Lri.iiia..4(..; te: 

4',004,41e mz7 aelt>azt• _ s-,-,.--„-- /AL Aeee- . -t-s-5-&-s--q 4' 

TEL EPROM E X 

6 499 '3'. /67-'6/ 

ORIG 

Foss. 

curt 

CATE 

F CST 

OATS 

ACTUAL 

DATE pe•664 Icsiz tra I iv a z/ - p:-7 ■ 

PP.,C. ACTION REQ IP AR) WV. 1'4-.4 < t1 Anil /9 ta EMMEN 4 6 Q /0 // /7 /3 /6 /7 4:3 AV Z;- .-7,5,,?:-;" f- - 1,- . ; : 1 ma:7_ 6 Illi 

2 DE F 333 RE ST AT EL'l EN T CON PL. , 6 XV/ MIME NM MION.M. MONiii. 2 

3 DETERM. APPL OF LIM Et-OF3-CUV 1111 • NOO I • • NMI 3 4 

0 011F meow na.cutv.,:o aiiii• •••••••• liiiiii -• inaia Via. OM 

01111111170 

OM 1•1111 

II SCA AAP ROV AL ocz;Eivoo •••• MOM ••••• • IIIIIIIIIIIIII 11101111•11 MN , 

LETTER CONTRACT I SZU ED • MIIM•OMOM•••• • • • ■ On ■ lOMMIN ■' ■ ' AU■11. 1111* 

RFP/IFD It:rum • ENE ... EMMOra. Ma MaialiMiiMIN iii•■• 7 

P Cr'PO SA!, CU T-OM7 FATE • MN ••• •• MAI • 011 1•11 M OMOM a 

0 

CON TR ACTOR'S PR 7.'," ruF.C13 111111111111111.1111111111 1111.1111 MEM 111 111 JIM ■ 10011111 

A CO C0t7^4 REC' 0 IIMMOOMMI • ' • • 111111110 MI MI MIMI III 

11 FCF1 RCCEIVED . WWI Ma Ina MOM 111 II • 

I I 

12 M AKE-OR-01JY PL PR ACCOIIPL. 11111111111111111 III NI 111111111 NI WI 11111111111111111111111 

is Aet, .4 t/‘ ,,? /.."-t. :Lt.:- •••••• Mr*. • •••••• MUM. UM In11.11111 13' 

14 NEGOTIATIONS CEGUN MOM. • ...MOM 011 110 MEI MUM M M to 

t2 N EGO TI AT IC. i 7, CG:.71. ET CE • ■ ■ • MOWN MS NO 111111M111111111 ■int 

IS FILE TO CONTI?* WRITING MOO • 1.11 • NM • • 1•11 111 111111 ■ • 

CONTRACT WRITING COMPL . • •• MO 1111 • • 111 M MOM 17 

NI JAG ISSA REVIEW COMPL MM. 

. IMMO. WA • all Mil 111 to 

19 FILE TO PVOC cou:, JatliV • 0MM • irAl • • M. 'S 

I2C1 REVIEW (S3111() CC' 1PL 7 AN 111 1 . BMW MEM NM Ma 

TO CON TR FOR SIGNATURE • • • 1111 ••• MIA MIIMINOOMO ill ■ • 

21 

22 CON T R RETURNED SIGN ED /Q JAN 111 • Mill ■ • •••• Ell 111,r401111111111111111 ■ a III■ 22 

23 FINAL ISC:CR i7"-1717 CCIL 70.7A NORO NI• MM 0 MOM a ■ M• MM I■I 

24 FIL E TO AF SC 707 Pi M 1111 IMM IMMIMMI 141 M MI MR . 24 

FILE FROM A F SC ' ' D j'A I --.... • 11••••••11 • III • NI ■IIII M.aria 2S 

GOVERNMENT SIGNATURE 3C)TA'i - • Il • II I. Ea lor0101 

21 CONTRACT DISTRICUTION 11 1•0•1 • 11111•11 NNW ER 27 

COORDINATION* IS AFP RD 0 PRICING ISEWP) a two nes Isom 0 PROC COIMI (SW(K) ri coNTR WRITING ISSKSVA 

MIL mom& SYMOOL S .1C2 OPEN ARFP.D 9 • DATE MILESTONE TO Olt ACCOPAPL (FORECAST) . " 

23 SOLID ARROW- DATE MILESTONE COMPL (ACTUAL) 

0 POLIO DIAMOND- !LIP FROM GATE SNOWS TO NEW DATE (OPEN ARROW .....0011 

...o.....w..10L1 0 NOM 20NT AL LINE- TIME PERIOD OF PARTICULAR EFFORT 

AF ISO PRINTING OIV. LA. CAy. M 11[3 

JUN

0 

 It ••4 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 CC:MAC? C2:)T?.) PLAI 

COOflOINATIONt 0 AFPRE/ JPRICING (SECP) 0 IND NZ$ (34X11 0 PPICIC Cows (swim) CONT1) 11141111140 ISSMS119 

MILESTONE SYMBOLS ■121P OPEN ARROW.,DATE MILESTONE TO WE ACCOMPL (FORECAST) 

SOLID ARROW- DATE MIL asTona C.0■.:PL iACTU AL) 

SOLIDDIAMO NO- SLIP FROM DATE 11140B TO NEW DATE (OPER ^Rogo w —Cs) 

ook,.. i 3 

JUN .111 ••0 AF SSD •RICITING DIV. L.A. C 

LUYEW 

6-6:0, EP W4f2P g 

CA..);3'63ACITTIT......,Lr1 

1,004 da:5--67-6"-&02.5 

CIIIIYI2Letva.:4 

7,167PDAWal 

1. v..., ei.-- 

I 6-e/4/4// 

, 

401- 

4..,... 

-:.,.. 

udg t ::. •,... r'r V V"' 

'-',/ 

u . .1 v Nriz.triZ 

Cr A ir.,..o L ..Li..iwT.r 

• 

---- "L"G// - 14 -etz;:,<n.57S '6:-.Z.9 

-

„.., 

./e7 

SYLII.C.M. 

S-"AS7--g3 1-417e-, --74 7:-S fFr.rpw,t47. ■ -6.7. 6.V-/765-- °RIG 

FCSt 

DATE 

CURR 

FEST 

OATE 

ACTUAL 

DATE 

-- 

Pe- :://:,_::::-_, 

.-,,.. 

1 PROC. ACTION REQ WARP /41/ 1,1..‹. ' .41,>1f /9 7.P 71 -7:(7: 2.--1•;-• 1.7dg 75 " 6 9 /0 // /z!/.; /6 /7 19 7,,-'t,,_:,- 2,`,21. 1O27 :::". . . : : / Z .9' 6 1 

2 DEF C.02.3 STATEl ENT COMPL EX Hoag 5-0-4A1 ila 

1111 

11 

11 

NMI 

KM 

• (j 

I... 

II 

- 

--..._ 

 ... 

' 

II 

NM 

EWEN 

 2, 

4, 

0; 

41 

3 DETER'1. APPL OF MAKE-OR-OUT 

4 DO F (11 CC0) REC El VED 

II EA APPC:OVAL RECEIVED 

6 L a T T En COMTLI ACT I SW ED 

7 ;=. 

- 

. 

..- -... 

- 

7, 

8 9 

9 

a 111111111111 

1.- 

- 

4.• ..=, 4,- 9 1 

10 ACO CCM.:-.3 ritsx'o 

amin a. 

• 

.111SaIN 

II 

11111111111111111111. 

•imissam 

n 

1 

EN 

11.111111811.1. 

• ..-_.. 

MIMI= 

surrognis 

milin 

a 

1111111110.111111111 11111011.11111111111111 

. 

1111111.1111111110.1.111111M 

........... 

smairmammil 

1111aaaMairaira, 

I 

: 

1 

{ la 

ii rcn aecovc:a 4 

N lai 1 3 

12 13 t1'( E-0 r- r' TY PL. A 11 ACCOMPL. Ae, 4.:.:,,,:i. 4(7 

14 NEGOTIATIOM1 DIGUN 

PAM 

MOM h 

_..,,, 

OM 

14, 

49 

14 

17 

14 N EGO TI A74 - 1 C'""';'-'1. EYE 

t) FtLE TO cx7,13 V.MITIND 

17 CO IT CiACT C - 7:;*1 COL 

IS JAG (SSA RT,Vitr./ COMPL in atm rvi 

1 I IS 

19 FILE TO F.DC COI ' / a a A A/Mil 1111.11111111111. re fll 

x• 'my, va (Se!IMI COMPL 111111111171MINIM NIIIIIIIIIIIIII III IIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 

KB 

110 

23 

24 

23 

20 

27 

21 

i 22 

TO CONTR poo acnATURIZ 

CON T R RC:TUC:NED SIGNED 

igS, JAN 

gilea 

1 

11111111111111111111111 

• MO M. 

• 

...... 

MINN 

,Ar..li 1 MINA 

IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 

all 

Win 

• MM 

1111 

23 FINAL (4!...ZI) REVIEW COMM. 25,74/Y Sal 111111111111.111111111111 

24 FILE TO AFC 74 OA: 11111111 11 1. M 

23 FILE FC.0:1 AFISC SO 1.74; I• 

AMMO 

23 GO V E Ft N el ail T Et G ti AT U R E 

igtPr 

30 in.)./ 

5/ a,: 

IIII 

il 

III 

27 corn' F1AcT 033TnioutioN 

140RI ZONT AL LINE - TIME PERIOD OF PARTICUL AR EFFORT 
mtlailAakKkVael3Ka 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

CC:.172ACi V% Ce.ezi7,1/aP 

„ - 

c Ny„,,,c ,..i., 

6-671477._31 

f,,e,iiII,CY I,a...,„L,I 

1

teart.1 

41.. — 

- )1(1.-1 

C. 46E471? /6" 47 le."5/04/ //topaz 

v.-47irIA-- 

7.7'(..V. $2,......,,IVca 

.--s.Tmii-01..AL4-,4 

ccA-6-e-/,-1.4 - <cfee-e 5 - -s- ,e,.-,---e2 •,e> 

---, 

-,"A A---G.-63' ,.., ,,,... rorovit6 "ViZeCS'.. ORIG 

FC$T 

DATE 

vita 

cunn 

;CST 

DATE 

-.:e.., t'4 ' 

ACTUAL 

OATS 

..... 

g 4 

airmaliMilt 

. 

5 

1111•0110111111 

6 /0 

,7-Aivu 

0 1 -7 I I 1/ a 

peCe7. ,c,r.& 

.1 

, 

-171:77:771 

IIII 

III■III 

1 

/.., 

Et 

1.1. /..7 e.,_; /V 7-0 2L.," :21 41" 10 7,27 

111111%1 —xl 

malum 

El _ 

ill 

 A -E13 

8 

a 

Lei 

1 3 

4 

1111311 

.roc. ACTION RCCI (PA ) 

1EF r.-orm STATC":ENT =""L 

IETERM. APPL OF MAKE-OR-BUY _ 

)8F (NEBO) RECEIVED 

. 

BA APPROVAL nacmco II Mai 1 

.ETTER CONTRACT MUM) 

IFP/117 11 I ,tkIED ISM MIN ' NNE 1.1•11111111111111111111111110111.5 . 1111. ar • , 

.ROPOSAL CUT-OFF DAT[ 1111.11111111111 ril ..., Mil

Mill 

Sill MEI 

awn 

eimellill =I 

OINEINIMMIIIII 

fa 

ttt 

N.MI ■ 

0 

..... 

XI 

11 

12 

:ONTIRACTOR'S PROP RECO ,c.00!:::11REC•D 

'C RECEIVED 

I AX E-OR-GUY PLAN ACCOL1Ft. 

AO, 

• 

, Mini 

. Ell all IIMPOI Mil 

1111-1111111 .

11.111111111111 

MM. 

MI 

13 

" IEGOTIATION9 BEGUN 

1 EGO TI AYM:1Cr; Cr:.ZPL ETC 

- 

■ 11 11111.4.11111111111.111 IIII sommosiromr - it NIIIIIIIIIIIN IS • 

'ILE TO CON T fl V.RITIMO 

a MEM 10 

:ONTM$1T C7 STING COMPL . F 

- 

. II 

1.01.111 

■ ..111 

IBM 

MIME 

17 

AG (SSA REVIEW COMPL le . 

1111 

1 

IL[ TO P t4DC C.C72"1 

IIEVI EN IF:-•:7) CAM 

O CONTR FOR SS ON ATUMI 

$J I 

6 xi,:i 

. v 

A 

—.- 

• MI II NMI .11111.11 

ili 2 % 

II 22 

23 

oNTR RETUnME0 SIGNED .1/37." IIIIIIIII ilimm 11111111111111111rg i A 

IN AL ISSNIG REVIEW COMM. /6071 

ILE TO AFSC 

ILE FROM AFSC 

/7 71,N Mill illl 

111.1 

:;1, 7 AN 

2.7 :::,N 

25 

• 

aaa " 

OVERNMENT SIGNATURE 

- - -11 ,ON T it ACT DISTRIBUTION P JAN 

MNATIONs AFPRO • . 0 PRICING MAP) 0 IND RES ISM/ 0 PROD comas t szs...cK) 

MILESTONE SYMOOLS 4n1 OPEN Artr.00- DATE MILESTONE TO BE ACCOMPL (FORECAST) 

ire SOLID ARROW- DATE MIL [STONE COMPL (ACTUAL) 

O SOLID DIAMOND-SLIP FROM DAT[ SNOWN TO NEW OAT[ (OP aim ADM W 

anoaamta.COLID 1401)1E0NT AL LINE- TIME PERIOD OF P ARTICUL AR Er IPCP VNt 

[J CONTR WRITING (ESNS* 

.s 153 mgvious anmeks OF • ; • ' •L AP SSG PRINTING DIV. LA. CALI . 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

A:r..rit2 Ara ul 2ATE2:1 PL 

'LIN' .•-42ELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

P?:..-.7.i.•;/'7.- 41.17.F 7/ 7,7.-,:a.-- - — : 

64 P- 57Z — g 

' ' t:;..,::4,4• - .:717...........:,i - -7:i7;1 

A-e,"`,-(75.7-e-co7si 

c,..,;-, - v;-za:.1-6 - a 

.. 

-ZU—: 

740z4....,,•, i ,,,..c..--icir v i,, ks i 

04------,0 

L-tiji-,ilii...L.S, ,i.:.,44.;:i.Z 

- —.....-- _ 

,._.., . 

IT L.7.3 

p,.r.tn-s aw .5; -17- 

5r: (L'..1 (71-4 

_ 

- 

ORM 

CST 

DATE 

CURR 

CS 

DATE 

EST/TARGET COST $ TAR07ZT-P1XEO F CF./PROFIT I. o. 

' DATE gA/V 0C'&76 Riel /IPA, 64f,45/ 

..,_ . 

trvAi _ I. 

. 

1 PF.00. ACT1011 (1E° tpswo 

. 

ME 

• 

' 

1 

2 DE F COCK ST AT EN CRT c.v.:T. A 

3 oaTer.!..1. APL OF tASIC-OR CUY 

- 

ma 

. .,. . . 

MEMO 

IIIII ........, 

41 

' 

atntr (II f2C-0) RECEIVED 

I MOEN - t3 A /..F,P P.0 V AL naceivar, , 

6 I. arren conynAcT ISM ED ' 

7 FIFP/tvin isruao . 1 

, 

$ 

panporr.+. CUT-OFF tura 

.., 

. 

)1 e. 

11 

CONTRACT —'f,Pr RFC !) 

-1 

..). II . 4. .e. 

•

-:.1, , 1111 • . 

C 

TO ACO CO: '.1:1 RCD * 

• 

11 pcp r,-;:ccivao --vica............ 

- - 

te.....-- 1 ,.. 

- 1; 

12 MAX E•O re- r ti y PL Ail Acar.,:ps.. 

,-, 

. 

, . - .. 

14 

14 

is 

. 

. . 

/I EC-0T1 ATIONS E =UN 

CI ECOTI ATION 3 C07.:=1... ET E 

• 

. 

11111111111111111.111.11111111 ' 

A. 

AIME 

- 

11.111.1.1 

. 

,. ” 

Ild 

15 FILE TO CON rn ITRITING 

I ' 

1.111111.11•1111 

••••1111E. 

I. MINIIIIIIIIII 

1111111111•1 

14 

1( 

17 CONTRACT WRITIV1 074:•.M. 

13 JAG ir."..',/ R.r.k.NCVI,Cel•f2L 

111 FILE TO P no c coma 

iniallil 1111111 -111111111 . .11r 

R 

23 N EVI aw (lam() coeva. . 

. • 

21 TO CONTR FOR SIGN ATU RE . 

• 

. 

III 111 

2' 

22 CONTR RETURNED SIGNED 

I 

24 

23 FINAL ISSICK) Ft EVI EV) COLIPI. 

24 FILE TO Arc= 

. 

.. .- ...... 

- - _ • 

• 1111 1 

MI 

• 

7 

23 FILE FROM AF 5C 21 

I... 

24 GOVERNUENT CIGNATURg 

1 

31 

27 CONTRACT DI ST 11; TO U T 10 RI 

- - . 

t 

COORDINATIONS ARM) DPRICING (SP) 0 INC Ras (=a) PROC cams (sock) ri CONTR tratITING (slams 

MILESTONE SYS/SOL S OP EN ARROW- DATE &Ill ESTONE TO OE ACCOSSPL (FORECAST) - 

4112> SOLID ARROW., DATE MILESTONE COMPL (ACTUAL) • 

0 SOLIDDI Al$011 0 • D. IP FROM DAT g SRO UN TO imaggDATE (OF MIN ARROW ••41fZIP) 

••••*.•••••••SOLID NORI ZONT AL LINE • TIME PERIOD OFF MITI CUL AR EP ropey 

rsCror4.i.ram.721m....."10 Yik."` M 0 11 L AP SSD PlsNQ DIV. LA. CAL 
prlc. ACTION FIE() (PAR! 

3 _,n1T.Fr R')RK ST AT 4- T COL 

L16 EGO) RECCI V 7.0 

S73A Ar,P nOVAL riff:cc:Ivan 

Lr.!TTfl CO1TP,ACT itniao 

7 1:WP,IF7.1 

PIV7PO,Vi. CUT-OFF DATE 

4 

FILE TO P ROC COMA 

REvI (SSNIC) CODPL 

21 TO coNTre FOR !ION ATURE 

15 

CURh 

FCST 

DATE 

CZT/TANGET COST $ TiVRGQT-FI XrLD JP 'IT % 

PRICING 1SSXP) . 0 IND RES (SM) 0 P C COMA I astc 

°Pan Ancow- DATE MILESTONE TO CE ACCOCPL (FOC A1) 

LID ARROW DATE SAL ESTI) E COMO'S.(ACTUAL 

SO LID 01 WON 0 - SLIP FMIA DATE sgonA TO 18 EV DATE (OPEN ARRD -C34 

M A A u`aDLEVit AF 3O f". :LUTING DIV. LA, CALIF. 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

.•440-7::`,.(::.. 

t... ',...I i ,...,,7C- , i 1 - ,Li .-,,- 

r' i..., •■ ••,...; -.`'''—'''''..---'''''''''..- ,......... ,--..... [V: ,:... r'''''"''"''''"'"'C''''''' 

I • - si-...... CL i i.:,.):: i ■ ,,,C; i s.,•1 ri,.. _■ 

AP--51--.9 14,,,-,,,-- .:-Tin/i,_-- 4/2:--- 47/flrilV co—,474,Cr Izroz., i 

-il-1,77.:.7/10II.: - I.: i:i.--- — 

ONIG 

FCST 

DATE 

NMI 

111111111111W111011101111_21. 

ilill. 

an UjoillignMarillt — PI • unmuns. Imi . 

wmiummin aimsma 

.111•111111•1111111MUNNIORIONNOIRMIN My NW iimmal•••••••11111•11•••1111.11111•1111•111111111•R liffillimmill MumuiimmiummummiNIMMININION•111111011 NW MOM 

II_ • 

I IMMINIUMONSTINIMINIMM RUM* •111111•1111111111 MO OM 

MX RIR 111111111,111•1111111 _ _ MI 

TCT ... r)? RECO 

CO'121.ETE 

13 FILE TO COATR '‘.;i7,1T1i4G 

13 

1? 

AG (SSJ) REVIEW CO:IPL 

I

uuu nt ar 

Ita .im r 1. 

ACTUAL 

DATE 

j El I NI, 1111111111111111111111 MN 111111111111110111 a MIN 1 inummo swig sommompoi 

•Itrium 

ri il 1.1 ,_."■V A)77_01!!?_,,,, _ 

• 1 lc 1 u.. (lilt ,.,,.. ,,,,......„ D 1 1 

...1....,L... ...1..._ __.1._ _ 

141,1111111p KUM II 

••• 

• 110 

INN 

_gjj LID j_ 

1 i I 

OD 

J.J. 11- 1 T1 1 la 

1- 

12 

Via win •1.1011111111f 10 

n 

I 

11A 

15 

1#3 

17 - 

3 

21 

22 

I 

MI 11111•11111,••••••11•110111111111•1111•11111111111TI IIIIIM 

1111•••imumnilmumemommam au 

wisimomounimamommumanum summrs 

2S 

23 

Z3 

27 

COO 14 DIN AT 10 NI 

=":1 153 • 

67 

2 

3 

ACO CO CL:C' 

11 FCR RCCCAVED 

111 j I'AAKE-or4-ruv PLAN ACCWW4.. 

NFGOTIATIONZ DEGUN 

22 CONTI: RETURNED 1.1 GNED 

23 FIN AL IS,SFXN1 11E41 E0 COMPL 

24 FILE TO AFSC 

211 FILE FROM AFSC 

3 GOVERNmENT 

27 CONTRACT C4 STC1C.:U1sION 

CONTRACT tirtrriciG coNPL 

AFPhO 0 

MILE5TO4E SYMCOLS 

0 

CONTR luRrrInG (SZNSTA • 

HORIZONTAL LINE- TINE PERIOD OF P ATATI CUL AR EFropity 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

Mc rizsr 

Viiic-1•43" .57/4. 9,1";!:rae2 1

514N-w1zr 060,49 

4re //1/47Z27 

&CA 

s7 PAtegg 

43 7O ? vra 

re..zgr . 

47:3 694 /14 

.674cia 

d47d5' 

67,473 ,-1-76-440 nzi5r FiZcelz4/4 

A rg 

)eag1a" 4/-41/?.P614/4t17 

406:/67-ta 

A 4. lamlevr co2eitepaawr 

v/ 

71-g 

27-4V 

/5-. 

S' 125,4 

2/. 7v 

49-0 

/.0 

g 

• / 

6-; 0 

f3.V 

99 • 

6 Gerl. 

ON/C- 41Pe Geyez regniva- • 30,o 

ACOe./s77a 7Yril-7/116- 4, 0 

‘4/01./rp Nt7iczos4-7/ PGA Air 

e 

Tor44. 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 ooa6-4A 

• wires i&& T4-rit-Fniar 

• VAP'er Silii0Mrote ope 

• 6(1171,ar /4O1,046 

• Ars ///rg- 

• vkiVia Wm-a-

/11.514 

OCA-awrizAricW pit/ 

F RA& 

PilaZ46-6° 

C7e4V6-sr aorg 

Pogirio/V 

wiPi-e7' tWxor/47704/57 

Wrivaor&- eat/772.4er 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

/7 

laS -MitrizAr(cyv ,e3z401 

0-AN PolS7 MA& e r.gos:===•.‹.-7.- /frielr e7WA/ 

fAi PAC/a6-&-- 

QUor6- 

fi 70A% 

/1/4Y-ormr(ave 

eatirzAcr 

10— 

20 

/5"" 

V/ 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 . 

6°7"/11" 4 

7.? tr.:77'dg 

Piekr,-,ze7 7a1.;r -

Are 

4744N/ 

zeiliA/V6z#:: 

406/gni&.5,4,-61/7-_&-a 

iekielvagivr &Warn:fon/0rWee 

p&-p-nwinT4770/1/ PAM/ 

0-410,4, P-0;e7 eeelp 
-rb-a-Wer44 

a.5r -

4 P0,57torle) it/ 

ara-OrteeirfolVg 

4/6' eativrerAcp-mvirlz4rfar AM/i/ 

,774/1/ A-617 

42-go 

,Z4 -74 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

OW 

AFF4,7o/zE;e,,7-E-7417 

4/1W ‘ -v&--zdelCoarfc 7-67-crfivelZ/Otifp l'Oc P444/7-