alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03424]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m. February 23, 2015 (Telephonic).

PLACE: 10th Floor Board Meeting Room, 77 K Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20002.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Open to the Public

1. Approval of the Minutes of the January 26, 2015 Board Member Meeting
2. Monthly Reports
    a. Monthly Participant Activity Report
    b. Monthly Investment Policy Report
    c. Legislative Report
3. Internal Audit Plan

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Kimberly Weaver, Director, Office 
of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

    Dated: February 13, 2015.
Megan Grumbine,
Deputy General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-03424 Filed 2-13-15; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-P
# C_2005137EN.01000201.xml

| 4.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 June 2005

(2005/C 137/04)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2289 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,57 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4399 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67570 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1410 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5359 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 80,66 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,898 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9557 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5747 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,174 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 250,63 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6959 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1158 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 150 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,5 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,769 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,6793 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6241 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5311 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5645 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7498 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0493 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 238,12 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,3573 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1710 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3248 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 772,86 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6698 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,006 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,850 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,035 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2289

JPY

Japanese yen

132,57

DKK

Danish krone

7,4399

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67570

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1410

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5359

ISK

Iceland króna

80,66

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,898

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9557

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5747

CZK

Czech koruna

30,174

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

250,63

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6959

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1158

ROL

Romanian leu

36 150

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,5

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,769

TRY

Turkish lira

1,6793

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6241

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5311

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5645

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7498

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0493

KRW

South Korean won

1 238,12

ZAR

South African rand

8,3573

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1710

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3248

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 772,86

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6698

PHP

Philippine peso

67,006

RUB

Russian rouble

34,850

THB

Thai baht

50,035

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# EXHIBIT 21.1

# List of Subsidiary
Companies

Channel Services S.A., a
Swiss company

CNET Europe (US), LLC, a Delaware
company

CNET International, Ltd.,
a Cayman Islands company

CNET Investments, Inc., a Delaware
company

CNET Korea Inc., a Korean
company

CNET Marketplaces, Inc. a Delaware
company

CNET Networks Asia
Pacific Pte Ltd, a Singapore company

CNET Networks Australia
Pty Ltd., an Australian company

CNET Networks Deutschland
GmbH, a German company

CNET Networks (France) SAS, a French
company

CNET Networks Japan KK, a Japanese
company

CNET Networks Korea Inc.,
a Korean company

CNET Networks UK Limited, a United
Kingdom company

CNET Subsidiary, Inc., a
Delaware company

dFactory SARL, a Swiss
company

INET Centric Finance
Inc., a Delaware company

mySimon, Inc., a
California company

ZDNet Global BV, a
Netherlands company

ZDNet Holdings BV, a
Netherlands company

ZDNet Italia Srl, an Italian
company

ZDNet Media (China) LDC,
a Cayman Islands company

Ziff-Davis (Tianjin)
Computer IT Co., Ltd., a Chinese company
#### Spellum, Respondent, vs. La Crosse *&*Southeastern Railway Company, Appellant.

*January 13*

January *30, 1912.*

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Vernon county: E. C. Higbee, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Action to recover compensation on account of taking lands for railway right-of-way purposes. The cause was submitted to the jury on the evidence, resulting in a verdict in plaintiff’s favor upon which judgment was rendered.

For the appellant there was a brief by *~Wm. S. Burroughs*and *Chas. W. Gh-aves,*and oral argument by *Mr. Burroughs.*

For the respondent there was a brief by TV. F. *& A. C. Wolfe,*and oral argument by TV. F. *Wolfe.*

Marshall, J.

The same points are raised in this case as in *Hauge v. La Crosse & Southeastern R. Co., ante,*p. 288. The circumstances in the two cases being alike, the judgment must be affirmed for th& reasoning stated for affirming that in the other case.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our reports dated February 28, 2006, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements and schedules included in the Annual Report of
Boykin Lodging Company and subsidiaries and Boykin/AEW, LLC on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005. We have also issued our report dated February 28,
2006 on the effectiveness of Boykin Lodging Company and subsidiaries internal
control over financial reporting. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Boykin Lodging
Company and subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File No. 333-39259, effective October 31,
1997) on Form S-3 (File No. 333-39369, effective November 14, 1997).


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
March 15, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      12,450,222
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,675,745
<ALLOWANCES>                                   316,178
<INVENTORY>                                    532,015
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,657,982
<PP&E>                                       4,390,355
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,881,476
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,507,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,742,899
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       114,454
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,507,825
<SALES>                                      3,772,067
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,772,067
<CGS>                                          732,337
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  732,337
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,496,033
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (456,303)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (456,303)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, J. David Berkley, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Sterion Incorporated;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  August 12, 2003

/s/  J. David Berkley

J. David Berkley
President
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Al A. Gonsoulin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. (the“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section1350, that: 1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for theperiod covered by such Report.Dated: August 8, 2005         By:                                                /s/ Al A. Gonsoulin    Al A. Gonsoulin    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
DIRECT AND INDIRECT SUBSIDIARIES OF AVAX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Note: All of the entities listed below are wholly owned direct or indirect
subsidiaries of AVAX Technologies, Inc., except as noted.

United States Incorporation (Delaware)

AVAX International IP Holdings, Inc.

AVAX International Holdings, Inc.

AVAX International Services, Inc.

AVAX America, Inc.

Denmark Offshore Holding Company

AVAX Technologies Holdings ApS

Australian Entities

AVAX Australia Holdings Pty Limited

AVAX Australia Pty Limited(1)

AVAX Australia Manufacturing Pty Limited(1)

----------
(1)   At December 31, 1999, AVAX Holdings Pty Limited held an 80% interest in
      both AVAX Australia Pty Limited and AVAX Australia Manufacturing Pty
      Limited. AVAX Holdings Pty Limited's interest in both of these entities
      may be reduced to 50%.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00046-CV

ARJANA MUHAMETAJ, D/B/A 

LITTLE BROTHERS FAMILY 

RESTAURANT

APPELLANT

V.

NORTHERN TRUST BANK OF 

CALIFORNIA, N.A., AND BRUCE R. 

MCALLISTER, NOT PERSONALLY 

BUT SOLELY AS CO-TRUSTEES 

OF THE MRM 1990 TRUST F/B/O 

BRUCE MCALLISTER AND

NORTHERN TRUST BANK OF 

CALIFORNIA, N.A., AND MARGOT 

B. MCALLISTER, NOT 

PERSONALLY BUT SOLELY AS 

CO-TRUSTEES OF THE MRM 1990 

TRUST F/B/O MARGOT B. 

MCALLISTER F/K/A MARGOT M. 

DIPPERT

APPELLEES

----------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

The trial court signed a final summary judgment on September 27, 2011. 

Appellant Arjana Muhametaj, d/b/a Little Brothers Family Restaurant, filed a 

timely motion for new trial on October 3, 2011. The notice of appeal was 

therefore due December 27, 2011.2 It was not filed, however, until January 30, 

2012. The notice of appeal was therefore untimely.3

On February 6, 2012, we notified Appellant by letter that we were 

concerned that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal 

was not timely filed. We stated that unless Appellant or any party filed with this 

court, on or before February 16, 2012, a response showing grounds for 

continuing the appeal, the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction.

On February 14, 2012, Appellees Northern Trust Bank of California, N.A., 

and Bruce R. McAllister, not Personally but Solely as Co-Trustees of the MRM 

1990 Trust f/b/o Bruce McAllister and Northern Trust Bank of California, N.A., 

and Margot B. McAllister, not Personally but Solely as Co-Trustees of the MRM 

1990 Trust f/b/o Margot B. McAllister f/k/a Margot M. Dippert filed a motion to 

dismiss for want of jurisdiction based on Appellant’s untimely notice of appeal. 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a).

3See id.
3

On February 16, 2012, Appellant filed two motions for extension, stating among 

other things that “[f]ailure to file notice of Appeal on time was not deliberate or 

intentional, but was the result of inadvertence, mistake or mischance[—a] 

mistake of the law consisting of belief that the appeal did not need to be 

perfected until after the [trial] court made findings of fact.”

We continued the appeal with the motions pending. But as Appellees point 

out in their motion to dismiss the appeal, the notice of appeal was filed more than 

fifteen days late. Consequently, Appellant’s reasonable explanation for the late 

notice of appeal does nothing to entitle Appellant to an appeal.4

Accordingly, we grant Appellees’ motion to dismiss this appeal for want of 

jurisdiction, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction,5and we dismiss 

Appellant’s motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: March 15, 2012

 

4See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, 26.3; Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 

(Tex. 1997).

5See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

TAZARIOUS VONELLIS HAWTHORNE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-105 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed May 26, 2017. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Reinaldo Ojeda, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

SALARIO, Judge. Tazarious Hawthorne challenges h is convictions and sentences fo r trafficking in hydrocodone (twenty-eight grams or more) and car rying a concealed firearm in this appeal that is proceeding pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). We affirm the convictions and sentences without commen t. We remand for the- 2 - purpose of having the trial cour t enter an order that dismisses , rather than denies, a motion to withdraw plea Mr. Hawthorne filed after being sentenc ed. The motion to withdraw was filed by Mr. Hawthorne pro se and al leged that his plea was involuntary because the trial court failed to determine whether he understood the terms of the plea agreement, whether he understo od the constitutional rights he was waiving, and whether a factual basis for the plea existed. The trial court denied the motion, finding that it was both facially insufficie nt and meritless. Mr. Hawthorne filed the motion to withdraw plea after he filed a notice of appeal of his judgment and sentences. Because the filing of a notice of appeal divests the trial court of jurisdiction, the trial court should have di smissed the motion on that basis instead of denying it. See Mingo v. State, 914 So. 2d 10 70, 1070 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Wilson v. State, 814 So. 2d 1203, 1204 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002 ). Inasmuch as the trial court was without jurisdiction to reach the merits of Mr. Hawthorne's pro se motion,

we must remand with instructions for the trial court to vacate its order denying that motion and to enter an order dismissing it for lack of jurisdic tion. See id. In that connection, it is not clear from our record whether Mr. Hawthor ne was also represented by counsel at the time he filed his pro se motion to withdraw p lea. If, on remand, the trial court finds that Mr. Hawthorne was represented and did no t move to discharge counsel, it should instead, after vacating the denial order, st rike Mr. Hawthorne's motion as an unauthorized pro se pleading. See Mingo, 914 So. 2d at 1 070; Sharp v. State, 884 So. 2d 510, 512 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). Neither disposition re aches the merits of Mr. Hawthorne's claim that his plea was involuntary. Affirmed; remanded with instructions.- 3 - BLACK and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                     -------------------------------------------------------------
                                        2001         2000         1999         1998         1997
                                     ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
                                                            (IN THOUSANDS)
<S>                                  <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
FIXED CHARGES:
  Gross interest expense             $  15,034    $  25,100    $  25,167    $  14,414    $   6,811
  Interest portion of rent expense          46           40           28           39           32
                                     ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
                                        15,080       25,140       25,195       14,453        6,843

EARNINGS:
  Income (loss) before taxes           189,404      127,743       36,369     (113,440)      33,423
  Plus:  fixed charges                  15,080       25,140       25,195       14,453        6,843
  Less:  capitalized interest          (12,042)     (13,739)     (11,860)      (9,817)      (5,873)
                                     ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
                                     $ 192,442    $ 139,144    $  49,704    $(108,804)   $  34,393

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED               12.8x         5.5x         2.0x          N/M         5.0x
</TABLE>
727 28 fee

(U) Liquid Oxygen Pressure Switch

Contract No. AF 04(647)-158, Frebank Company. A No-Cost
Proposal Agreement.No. 2 is in process to revise and clarify parts
of the work statement and amend the delivery schedule. Distribu-
tion of this Supplemental Agreement is contemplated on or. before
4 February 1959. - 5 :

(S} lunar observatory studies , b Sp YY

Two contracts for manned Intelligence Lunar Observatory Studies
have been transferred to the Special Projects Division (LBIP) from
Headquarters Air Research and Development Commend. One is with |
Boeing Airplane Company (a 18(600)-1824) and the other with North .
American Aviation (AF 18(600)-1825). Purchase Requests, in the :
‘amount of $75,000 for each contract, have been received calling for
expansion of the studies.

(U) Space Technology Laboratories, Inc.

1. Negotiations are scheduled to begin 4 February 1959 under :
Contract No. AF 04(647)-302. This contract will cover STL's eff 3
under Projects ABLE-3 and ABLE-+. Work is presently being performed
under a Letter Contract. :

2. Letter Contract No. AF.04(647)-309 is being amended to
incorporate SE/TD effort by STL for ARPA Space Probes. Anticipate
issuance of the Amendment during the week of 2 February 1959.

3. Supplemental ement #11 to Contract No. AF 04(6%7)-165
which definitized CCN is presently in Contractor's possession -
for review and signature. Receipt of signed document is expected : :
momentarily. This will complete all contract action under Contract . :
No. AF 04(647)-165, except the Novation Agreement (8A #8) which is a
being reviewed by the Contractor prior to signature. A problem ¢
relative to acceptancy of certain aspects of the Air Force Policy La
incorporated in the document is delaying signature by the Contractor. ;

(U) Grand Central. Rocket Company

Contract Change Notifications #1 and #2 have been definitized
-as Supplemental Agreement #1 to Contract No. AF 04(647)-209, and is
presently in Contractor's possession for signature. When this docu-
ment is executed and distributed this will complete all contract
- St. _

oownS ffi on APS ean INERVALS, further problems exist. H
DECLASSIFIED AFTER 12 YEARS,
ROD DIR 5200.10 .
Z SELBT FIST ..