alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IN RE: GLYCOBIOSCIE NCES, INC., Appellant

______________________

2014

- 1793

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,687.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J EROLD I. S CHNEIDER , Schneider Rothman IP Law Group, Boca Raton, FL, argued for appellant. Also repr esented by J OEL B. R OTHMAN

.

F RANCES L YNCH , Office of the Solicitor, United States
Patent and Trademark Offic e, Alexandria, VA, argued for
intervenor Michelle K. Lee . Also re presented by S ARAH E.
C RAVEN

, N ATHAN K. K ELLEY

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :P ER C URIAM (M OORE

, S CHALL

, and O’M ALLEY

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

July 10, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          95,052
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  200,922
<ALLOWANCES>                                    26,109
<INVENTORY>                                    222,967
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               504,026
<PP&E>                                       3,252,995
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,189,471
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 567,550
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,256,971
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,400,000
<COMMON>                                        61,674
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,218,219)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   567,550
<SALES>                                      1,691,541
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,691,541
<CGS>                                          605,750
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  923,784
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,375)<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,333
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                157,049
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            157,049
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   157,049
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
<FN>
<F1>Other expenses consists of a gain on sale of asset of $500 and foreign
currency gain of $875.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certificate of Principal Executive Officer

pursuant to section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of CNET Networks, Inc. (CNET
Networks) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Neil M. Ashe, Chief Executive Officer and Director of CNET Networks, Inc.,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CNET Networks.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|Dated: February 27, 2008            
|                                    
|/s/ Neil M. Ashe                    
|Neil M. Ashe                        
|Director and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CNET Networks and
will be retained by CNET Networks and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
This folder contained a partial document.

The complete document is located in Folder 195.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer 
  Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 a
  s Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report of UltraGuard Water Systems
  Corp on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
  Securities and Exchange Commission, John R Gaetz. Chief Financial Officer of
  UltraGuard Water Systems Corp, hereby certifys pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarban-Oxley Act of 2002, to
  my knowledge

|(1) | the annual report of UltraGuard Water
        Systems Corp for the period ended December 31, 2003, fully complies with
        the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934; and                                                      
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | the information contained in such quarterly
        report of UltraGuard Water Systems Corp for the period ended December
        31, 2003 fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial conditions
        and results of operations of UltraGuard Water Systems Corp.

|Date: April 13, 2004 |                        
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|                     |                        
|                     | /s/ J R Gaetz          
|                     | John R Gaetz           
|                     | Chief Financial Officer

---
#### Anonymous.

A motion to dismiss a cause brought up by a *certiorari,*was made upon the ground, that the notice which had been ordered at the last term to be given to the Defendant, had not been given; but it appearing that the Defendant had entered an appearance by the initials of his attorney’s name, being placed on the docket, the motion was refused.

A *certiorari*had been obtained for the removal of the records of a cause from a County Court into this court, returnable the term before last, and no notice of this *cer-tiorari*having been served on the adverse party, the court at the last term, ordered such notice to issue, and at this term no notice having been served, the Defendant in the *certiorari,*by *Mr. Duffy*his attorney, entered an appearance m the usual form, namely, by writing the initials of the attorney’s name to the suit on the docket ; and now *Mr. Duffy*moved for a dismission of the *certiorari*for want of notice to the Defendant, according to the rule of the last term ; and he urged, that as no process was issued to give notice from the lust term, that was of itself a discontinuance of the whole cause.

*Per curiam*

When a *certiorari*is obtained to remove a cause from a court below, tiie adverse party should have notice, to the end .he may appear and oppose the motion for a new trial if he thinks proper. As the court at the last term ordered process to issue from that term, it must now be taken that the cause was not then discontinued — had it been, no such process would have been ordered, but a discontinuance would have been entered, or a *procedendo.*Then notice should have issued from the last term ; am! it appears now, that no process for that purpose has actually been served since, but the Defendant’s attorney has entered his appearance and moved on behalf of the Dtfendant for a dismission, and this is proof that the Defendant had notice., it is alwojs s.o taken. *Vide*1 *Stran.*261. 2 *Stran.*1072. *Salk.*59_ The object of process is to give notice to the Defendant, and to bring him into court ; bul if he Chuses to come in voluntarily, that supersedes the necessity of process. — » The entering the initials of the attorney’s name on the docket, is the usual mode of appearing here practised, and is looked upon as equivalent to his having a power of attorney for that purpose, signed by his client, asprac-*468tised in the English courts. Such a power, and an appearance m consequence thereof, is a Waiver of all objections for irregularity or want of process, if the adverse par!) Chuses so to consider it. The motion to dismiss was refused.
----

            POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUPT/1/2006

of 2 May 2006         

concerning the appointment of the Head of the EU Planning Team (EUPT Kosovo) regarding a possible EU crisis management operation in the field of rule of law and possible other areas in Kosovo

(2006/353/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 25 thereof,

Having regard to Council Joint Action 2006/304/CFSP of 10 April 2006 on the establishment of an EU Planning Team (EUPT Kosovo) regarding a possible EU crisis management operation in the field of rule of law and possible other areas in Kosovo (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Casper KLYNGE is hereby appointed Head of the EU Planning Team (EUPT Kosovo) regarding a possible EU crisis management operation in the field of rule of law and possible other areas in Kosovo.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

It shall apply until 31 December 2006.

Done at Brussels, 2 May 2006.

For the Political and Security Committee

The President

F. J. KUGLITSCH            

----

(1)OJ L 112, 26.4.2006, p. 19.

----
DEPARTMENT OF ft AIR FORCE

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM

- 1 Pet Dk ) Sedel*

‘rdet

. .: .4.• X41/

f, 4./ ,7,0f Ci•••/ 014.4.ofiezp ‘

nel-,° "V...6‘t•gnc.c.,a.nsv..4..e. 41°4.4

471/2/0'2 a'4 .-s.u.e...p...:X

ip'2.49-V-eeit,e• SP'

•

-Awe"

#44200°

eez-s,cc:3) .7:40

....7011Fs

•

•
-(3)-NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. PLUMMER •

:,

;01 N99

0064`

WASHINGTON. D.C.

4

•

THE NRO STAFF January 24, 1974

SUBJECT: S&T Intelligence Data Flow

We have reviewed the attached package and concur with the

proposed response to Dr. Hall.

We have informally discussed with Col Jackson on Dr. Hall's

staff, and with DIA, the problem of delivering product information directly from collection sites to users at the same time

data is provided to the primary processor. It would be relatively easy and inexpensive to add this capability for the

Naval Intelligence Support Command and the Army Missile

Intelligence Agency; the Air Force Foreign Technology Division

is already served by an NRO Univac 9300 data terminal. What is

required is that DIA and NSA relax their chartered requirements

to be the sole direct recipients of this information, and I understand that Dr. Hall is proposing changes for that purpose.

By separate letter Dr. Hall has asked us to consider

releasing SIGINT tapes from NRO ground sites at the TK level.

The problem is that some tapes are classifie cause

spacecraft and ground site locations can be tillarfrom

them. We have action to respond to Dr. Hall on this. Although

we had planned to have a proposal for your signature on

January 25, the magnitude of the task will require us to take

a few more days. We are presently leaning toward releasing

11111111 

apes at the TK level, rather than recommending more

learances.

The recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee include improving the secure telephone service to customers. While this

certainly appears • o be a good goal, it would undoubtedly

CLAIIIII1111111111117: PI

s

 MA asu utat. lam _Top_sEgiff

fikOCUTIVI CATS. wow ses oactmare ON !ND ONT.

CONTROL NO Interne. 

COPY OF COPIE.

PAGC-1—OF PAGE!

•••1•11.
•

TOP-SECRETrequire significant expansion of the present, limited, secure

voice system. (This is not, however, an NRO responsibility.)

The implication for the NRO is possibly the establishment of

informal communications between the Service SW analysts and

the NRO ground site analysts. While this could have the disadvantage of diluting on-site analysts' efforts from their

primary tasks, there could be overall benefits to the production

of better intelligence. It is an idea worth looking into further.

•

alIMPI.R0 HO 111111

Lt Colonel, USAF

s I • 1 •MOP

. L. I I*

I Ma JP,. IM61 • I W.. 1 WI 1111 ••th Cn11.1

:.::•• .MIN 1'1 ay.. D. •

11111

CONT /WI NO Internal COPY OF COPIES

PAGE .j PAnFs

•';
Anaconda-Pintler - Worst - Total Extinction Anaconda-Pintler - Worst - NO3 Extinction

Site Method Year N

Total

Extinction Site Method Year N

NO3

Extinction

SULA1 NIA 2001 24 35.73 SULA1 NIA 2001 24 1.26

SULA1 NIA 2002 24 34.21 SULA1 NIA 2002 24 1.58

SULA1 NIA 2003 23 66.3 SULA1 NIA 2003 23 1.57

SULA1 NIA 2004 24 33.84 SULA1 NIA 2004 24 1.45

170.08 Total 5.86 Total

42.52 Average 1.465 Average

2000-2004 Average Annual Nitrate Share of Particle Light Extinction 3%

Anaconda-Pintler - Best - Total Extinction Anaconda-Pintler - Best - NO3 Extinction

Site Method Year N

Total

Extinction Site Method Year N

NO3

Extinction

SULA1 NIA 2001 23 13.62 SULA1 NIA 2001 23 0.43

SULA1 NIA 2002 23 13.15 SULA1 NIA 2002 23 0.39

SULA1 NIA 2003 22 11.99 SULA1 NIA 2003 22 0.18

SULA1 NIA 2004 23 13.19 SULA1 NIA 2004 23 0.36

51.95 Total 1.36 Total

12.9875 Average 0.34 Average

2000-2004 Average Annual Nitrate Share of Particle Light Extinction 3%

Gates of the Mountains - Worst - Total Extinction Gates of the Mountains - Worst - NO3 Extinction

Site Method Year N

Total

Extinction Site Method Year N

NO3

Extinction

GAMO1 NIA 2001 24 30.3 GAMO1 NIA 2001 24 1.94

GAMO1 NIA 2002 23 29.29 GAMO1 NIA 2002 23 1.76

GAMO1 NIA 2003 22 37.15 GAMO1 NIA 2003 22 2.28

GAMO1 NIA 2004 23 30.65 GAMO1 NIA 2004 23 1.52

127.39 Total 7.5 Total

31.8475 Average 1.875 Average

2000-2004 Average Annual Nitrate Share of Particle Light Extinction 6%

Gates of the Mountains - Best - Total Extinction Gates of the Mountains - Best - NO3 Extinction

Site Method Year N

Total

Extinction Site Method Year N

NO3

Extinction

GAMO1 NIA 2001 23 12.03 GAMO1 NIA 2001 23 0.5

GAMO1 NIA 2002 22 12.56 GAMO1 NIA 2002 22 0.63

GAMO1 NIA 2003 21 10.92 GAMO1 NIA 2003 21 0.27

GAMO1 NIA 2004 22 12.13 GAMO1 NIA 2004 22 0.54

47.64 Total 1.94 Total

11.91 Average 0.485 Average

2000-2004 Average Annual Nitrate Share of Particle Light Extinction 4%
FIRST M
& F CORPORATION





EXHIBIT
32.2





SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATIONS





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of First M&F Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, John G. Copeland, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





A.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





B.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
            May
      14, 2010





/s/ John G.
      CopelandJohn G. CopelandEVP
      & Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                   5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1997 AND THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS
THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                       0001004317
<NAME>                      IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER>                1,000
<CURRENCY>                  U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                        MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1.000
<CASH>                                                    1,767
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            26,865
<ALLOWANCES>                                            (1,076)
<INVENTORY>                                                 923
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         36,166
<PP&E>                                                  170,776
<DEPRECIATION>                                          (48,939)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          301,797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    29,856
<BONDS>                                                 201,465
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                    101
<OTHER-SE>                                               51,833
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            301,797
<SALES>                                                  42,154
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         42,154
<CGS>                                                    21,764
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            37,693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        5,140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (679)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               (163)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (516)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (516)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (0.05)
        

</TABLE>
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to 

revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

-1-

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ST. CLAIR SHORES,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

UNPUBLISHED

October 29, 2020

v No. 349910

Macomb Circuit Court

MICHAEL DORR, LC No. 2019-000135-AR

Defendant-Appellant.

Before: SWARTZLE, P.J., and JANSEN and BORRELLO, JJ.

JANSEN, J. (concurring). 

I concur in the result only. 

/s/ Kathleen Jansen
# Field Operations Emissions Reduction (Ac.) (376) Conservation Practice Standard

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 
-  Field Operations Emissions Reduction (Ac.) (376) Conservation Practice Standard 

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Field Operations Emissions Reduction (Ac.) (376).

## National Standard Document

NOTICE - National conservation practice standards should not be used to plan, design or install a conservation practice. To find these documents at the local level, visit our Field Office Technical Guide website.

Conservation Practice Name (Units) (Code) (Date Issued)

Field Operations Emissions Reduction (Ac.) (376) (7/2022) Standard Document(87.5 KB)

###   Supporting Documents

Field Operations Emissions Reduction (Ac.) (376) Overview(319.94 KB)

Field Operations Emissions Reduction (Ac.) (376) Network Diagram(78.8 KB)

##   Additional Information

### Conservation Practice Standards

On this page find links to national conservation practice standards and supporting documents.
Learn More

### Conservation Practice Standards Information

Learn about the information provided in conservation practice standards and supporting documents, such as overviews, worksheets, and network effects diagrams.
Learn More
MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INTERNAL
CONTROL STRUCTURE RELATIVE TO THE SERVICING OF
HOME LOAN RECEIVABLES


The management of the Bank is responsible for establishing and maintaining
the internal control structure.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expected
benefits and related costs of control procedures.  The objectives of an
internal control structure are to provide management with reasonable, but
not absolute, assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from
unauthorized use or disposition, and that transactions are executed in
accordance with management's authorization and recorded properly to permit
the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles.

We have performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Bank's internal
control structure based on the criteria established in Internal Control -
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") relative to the servicing of home loan
receivables owned by Chevy Chase Home Loan Trusts Series 1996-1 and 1997-1
(collectively referred to as the "Trusts" herein) as of September 30, 1999,
and we have determined that the Bank maintained an effective internal
control structure over financial reporting relative to the servicing of
home loan receivables owned by the Trusts as of September 30, 1999.

However, there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any internal
control structure, including the possibility of human error and the
circumvention or overriding of controls.  Accordingly, even an effective
internal control structure can provide only reasonable assurance with
respect to reliability of financial statements and safeguarding and
management of assets.  Furthermore, the effectiveness of any internal
control structure can change with changes in circumstances.



_____________________		_________________________
Russell J. McAtee		    Stephen R. Halpin, Jr.
Senior Vice President		Executive Vice President and
			                   	Chief Financial Officer


_____________________
George P. Clancy, Jr.
Executive Vice President

October 20, 1999