alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAgjjffiftfcl^.

STATE OF TE

PENALTY FOG? ssssmjss^ PRIVATE USE ^"^^^^ 0006557458 FEB 25 2015

2/19/2015 8£' \/,6TOff^ MAILED.FftOM ZIPCODE 78 701

DAVIS, WILLIE JAMES TivCt. No?p45782:A /' WR-82,894-01

On this day, the application for 11 07 Writ of Habeas^Corpus has been received

and presented to the Court. ^

Abel Acosta, Clerk

AAW0S3B 7015

WILLIE JAMES DAVIS

300 AUDREY LN %

HOUSTON, TX 77015

1,1,1,|l,|||l,.I||l|l<l|l.,1.111,1,,(l|ll|l,.l,.|.l|>ll,|l.l.ll.,

I A''
# C_2004286EN.01000101.xml

| 23.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/1

---

REPORT BY THE EXTERNAL AUDITOR ON THE COURT OF AUDITORS'
ACCOUNTS FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2003

REPORT BY THE EXTERNAL AUDITOR ON THE COURT OF AUDITORS'
ACCOUNTS FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR

(2004/C 286/01)

NOTE
TO READERS

Without prejudice to the provisions of Article
248 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, which gives the Court
of Auditors responsibility for auditing all of the Community's revenue and
expenditure, and the provisions of Article 276 of the said Treaty on the granting
of the discharge, the Court of Auditors has had its revenue and expenditure
accounts audited by an external auditor every year since the close of the
financial year 1987.

The reports which the external auditor of the Court
of Auditors drew up in respect of the Court's accounts for the financial years
1987 to 1991 were sent only to the Chairman of the European Parliament's Budgetary
Control Committee.

Pursuant to a decision taken by the Members of the
Court of Auditors at the Court meeting of 8 July 1993,
the external auditor's reports have since been published in the Official
Journal of the European Union, starting with the report on the financial
year 1992.

Official
Journal of the European Union

For the Court of Auditors

Juan
Manuel FABRA VALLÉS

President of the Court

---
# C_2004273EN.01002501.xml

| 6.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/25

---

Action brought on 27 September 2004 by the European Parliament against the Council of the European Union

(Case C-413/04)

(2004/C 273/46)

An action against the Council of the European Union was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 27 September 2004 by the European Parliament, represented by A. Baas and U. Rösslein, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The European Parliament claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Council Directive 2004/85/EC of 28 June 2004 amending Directive 2003/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the application of certain provisions to Estonia; (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Directive 2004/85/EC of 28 June 2004 amending Directive 2003/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the application of certain provisions to Estonia; (1)

1

| — | order the Council to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

Article 57 of the Act of Accession 2003 is not the appropriate legal basis for the adoption of the disputed directive. The purpose of that provision is to adapt Community legislation by reason of accession and to apply to the new Member States Community acts which have not been adapted by the Act of Accession itself. Accordingly, further amendments cannot be based on Article 57 of the act. That provision cannot be used to introduce derogations to Community acts, particularly those which go beyond those expressly granted by and delimited in the Act of Accession.

There has been a failure to give sufficient reasons for the disputed directive, as the justification for using Article 57 of the Act of Accession 2003 as a legal basis is not in any way apparent from the recitals in the preamble to and the other provisions of the directive.

---

(1)  OJ L 236 of 7.7.2004, p. 10.

1

---
••
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR

- • ..

--W-SECIEt- •

AS)-NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

6 August 1976

•

etmwmrollillietum mom

mu. oom immiouut

IMUMUTIMI 0110M111812 SIPIMPTION CM&

ja oomv MMILAIMPII MP IMP MT.

or•

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. RUMSFELD

TBRU MR. REED

SUBJECT: Briefing to the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board

The President's Foreign Intelligenc e Advisory Board was briefed on

the National Reconnaissance Program (NRP) this morning. The Chairman

stated that the Board was interested in the management and streamlined

operation of the NIP, the impact of the proposed new charter, and satellite

survivability. Our formal briefing covered what the NIP encompasses, system.

descriptions, Space Transportation System interfaces, and satellite

survivability.

Members of the Board made numerous observations. They expressed the

opinion that the NIP management should be preserved as a unique establishment, commenting that it had realized remarkable achievements through the

streamlined management technique. They believe that this capability might

be degraded. We responded that the increasing number of interfaces is an

item of concern to us, but as yet there is no impact on the quality of the

program. When quizzed specifically regarding the impact of organizational

changes, we.responded that everyone is working to avoid degrading impacts.

The Board noted that NRP systems have increased in complexity, capability, life on orbit and costs, and as a consequence we are flying fewer

vehicles. This is viewed as a strategy with significant risk in view of

Soviet anti-satellite capabilities and the long pipeline times to replace

satellites. It was stated that perhaps we should change our policy to build

a greater number of cheaper systems. The Board . .ressed hat we

.no .ave an an -sae ita capabi ty.

the re two= theies and the Navy

observed144IIIIIIIIa question is being II

We have no formal follow-up acti

•

.

Acting

•

CONTROL 11' 55-7

COPY 62—f OF COPIES

PAGE4,..OF I PAGES
THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

WASHINGTON. D. C. 20301

MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE

CHAIRMAN, JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF

DIRECTOR, DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING

ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

(INTERNATIONAL SECURITY AFFAIRS)

SUBJECT: National Space Policy

The National Security Council Staff is preparing to

address a comprehensive and coherent national space policy

which will tie together various policy elements that have

been generated, sometimes piecemeal, over the years.

Initial meetings have already been held and have involved

DOD participation.

To insure adequate Defense representation in this

important effort, I direct participation by each of the

agencies addressed. The senior DOD member of this group

will be provided by the ASD(ISA). The Director. Defense

Research and Engineering; Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff,

and the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force will each

provide a backup member who will be present at meetings.

Please provide the names of your representatives to the

ASD(ISA). The ASD(ISA) shall keep me fully informed of

the activities of this committee.
Certification Pursuant To
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Somerset International Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the six months ending June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Paul Patrizio,
Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of
               the dates presented and the results of operations of the Company.



                                           /s/ Paul Patrizio
                                           ----------------------------------
                                               Paul Patrizio
                                               Principal Financial Officer

Dated: August 13, 2004
#### William Grady HARPER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 21683.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

April 30, 1965.

Rehearing Denied June 8, 1965.

Guy B. Scott, Jr., Athens, Ga., for appellant.

Floyd M. Buford, U. S. Atty., Gary B. Blasingame, Asst. U. S. Atty., Macon, Ga., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS* and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.

*

 Senior Judge of the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

The conviction of appellant of the offense of possession of property used or intended to be used in violation of the Internal Revenue Laws, 26 U.S.C.A. § 5686(a) was based partially on circumstantial evidence, as is nearly every criminal prosecution involving intent. We find the evidence ample to warrant submission to the jury the question of the intended use of the 17,700 pounds of sugar, loaded on the truck driven at night by the appellant, after he had rented it under an assumed name. Its finding of guilt is fully supported.

The judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03279]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-85,547]


Foxconn Assembly LLC/Foxconn Hon Hai Logistics LLC; A Subsidiary 
of Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., LTD Including Workers Whose 
Unemployment Insurance (UI) Wages Are Reported Under Foxconn Hon Hai 
Logistics Texas, LLC, EMS Assembly LLC and Q-Hub Corporation and 
Including On-Site Leased Workers From Spiretek International, Inc., 
Effex Management Solutions, LLC Houston, Texas; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on October 10, 2014, applicable to workers and former workers of 
Foxconn Assembly LLC/Foxconn Hon Hai Logistics LLC, a subsidiary of Hon 
Hai Precision Industry Co., LTD, including workers whose unemployment 
insurance (UI) wages are reported under Foxconn Hon Hai Logistics 
Texas, LLC and EMS Assembly LLC, and including on-site leased workers 
from Spiretek International, Inc. and Effex Management Solutions, LLC, 
Houston, Texas. The Department's Notice of Determination was published 
in the Federal Register on October 29, 2014 (79 FR 64413). The firm is 
engaged in production of printed circuit boards.
    At the request of the State of Texas, the Department reviewed the 
certification applicable to the subject firm.
    During the review, the Department confirmed that Foxconn Assembly 
LLC has operated under the name Q-Hub Corporation and paid workers in 
the group under this name.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-85,547 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Foxconn Assembly LLC/Foxconn Hon Hai Logistics 
LLC, a subsidiary of Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., LTD, including 
workers whose unemployment insurance (UI) wages are reported under 
Foxconn Hon Hai Logistics Texas, LLC, EMS Assembly LLC and Q-Hub 
Corporation, and including on-site leased workers from Spiretek 
International, Inc. and Effex Management Solutions, LLC, Houston, 
Texas, who became totally or partially separated from employment on 
or after September 22, 2013 through October 10, 2016, and all 
workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation 
from employment on the date of certification through October 10, 
2016, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 
2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

    Signed in Washington, DC this 2nd day of February, 2015.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2015-03279 Filed 2-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2
                                                                    ------------


     Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
     -----------------------------------------------------------------------



         I, Joseph W. Pooler, Jr., the Senior Vice President of Finance, in my
capacity as principal financial and accounting officer of Pegasus Communications
Corporation, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that the Form 10-K of Pegasus Communications Corporation for the annual
period ended December 31, 2002 (the "2002 Form 10-K"), which this certification
accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and information
contained in the 2002 Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Pegasus Communications
Corporation.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Pegasus Communications Corporation and will be retained by
Pegasus Communications Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated:  March 31, 2003


                                            /s/ Joseph W. Pooler, Jr.
                                            -------------------------------
                                            Joseph W. Pooler, Jr.
-{8} NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

THE NRO STAFF

18 Augutt 1977

MEMORANDUM FOR DR MARK

SUBJECT: DNRO Membership on the NFIB

•

In 1965 the Deputy Secretary of Defense and the Director of Central

Intelligence signed the NRO Charter ("Agreement for the Reorganization of

the National Reconnaissance Program," 11 August 1965). This document

includes the statement that the Director of the NRO will "sit with the

USIB for the matters affecting the NRP." Periodically, the DNRO did

attend USIB meetings when NRO matters were on the agenda. It was not

specified if the DMR0 was a voting timber when he attended.

During a meeting soon after he was appointed as DCI, Admiral Turner

expressed surprise to Dr Cook that the NRO was not a full member of the

MB, and invited NRO participation as Dr Cook believed appropriate. As

a result, the NFIB Secretariat was requested by the IRO to be included on

distribution for all NFIB actions. Each item is screened for interest,

and we do comment on those items of concern. The NRO refrains from responding to purely intelligence matters.

DKRO membership on the NFIB is not treated in the draft E.O. implementing PD/NSC-17, but appears to be excluded. An earlier draft prepared by the

IC Staff provided for attendance by invitation.

It appears prudent to maintain a continuing interest in NFIB membership

for matters affecting the NRP. If this position is acceptable, I will draft

an exchange of correspondence between you and the DCI to establish the

relationship more formally. I note that this presupposes that our comments

to the draft E.O. are accepted, which would permit additional NFIB members.

WILLIAM L. MELDS,

Brigadier General, USAF

Director

CLAIMMIL11111111111=r WM*" MMOMMOMMRSIMMUMWMIONCATIwilfLiECIff-TGOWIMOSCLAIMPIONIMPOST

CONTROL NO Internal 

COPY OF COPIES

MCI I or I PAGES
#### Diamond Shoe Company, Appellant, vs. Adams and others, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Samuel Becker,*attorney, and *Blood-good, Stebbins & Bloodgood*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondents: *Martin & Kelley*of Fond du Lac.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.

Fowler, J., took no part.
IN •

-W-SECRET-

•

• -121-NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE !--71

.•

WASHINGTON, D.C. 111111.11111111 •

OVPICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR January 28, 1971

Dear Jake,

I have read with interest two of the messages that

Dr. Low sent back while he was in Moscow holding the

recent space talks with the Soviets. We particularly

noted the Soviet inclusion of cooperation in earth

resources surveying and talk of test sites in both

countries. Because all of the items discussed at the

talks are of interest to us, and particularly the earth

resources survey topic, we would be interested in hearing

more about the meetings from one of the attendees. I

would appreciate • it, if you would arrange for a debriefing

of the SRO Staff at a time convenient to your people.

Sincerely, •

F. Robert Nike.

General Jacob E. Smart, USAF (Rot.)

Assistant Administrator for DOD

Interagency Affairs

National Aeronautics and Space

Administration

I/11111111r TOMIREF- 111011101 IPM n MNINSUM IMMIMMIS

MO 110101,1 MSS VI MKS OM MKT

.:a 912566-7:

CIPPOU

/4/-2T- /Rt172-

.

.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 14

- 00460

- CR

R USSELL L

AMAR E STES

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 396th District Court

of Tarrant County (1388628R)

December 13 , 2018

Opinion by Justice G abriel

(p)

JUDGMENT ON REMAND

On remand from the court of criminal appeals, t his court has again considered

t he record on appeal and holds that there was no reversible error in the trial court’s

judgment s . It is ordered that the judgment s of the trial cour t are affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

Justice Lee Gabriel
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1284 

To clarify the treatment of carbon emissions from forest biomass, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 11, 2015 

Mr. KING introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To clarify the treatment of carbon emissions from forest 

biomass, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CARBON EMISSIONS FROM FOREST BIOMASS. 

4 In taking an action regarding air emissions from an 

5 energy source or facility that uses forest biomass, the Ad6 ministrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall 

7 assume that forest biomass emissions do not increase over8 all carbon accumulations in the atmosphere if— 

9 (1) a Forest Inventory and Analysis of the De10 partment of Agriculture that is current at the time 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1284 IS

1 the action is taken shows that forest carbon stocks 

2 in the United States are stable or increasing; or 

3 (2) the forest biomass is derived from mill re4 siduals, harvest residuals, or forest management ac5 tivities. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
HomeNRC LibraryFOIA & Privacy ActRecent FOIA Requests2021

# Recent FOIA Requests – April 2021

This page presents a chronological listing of the subject and reference number of each Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act (FOIA/PA) Request submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) during April 2021. For additional detail, see the Index of Closed FOIA/PA Requests by Subject.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, May 11, 2021

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - January
          - February
          - March
          - April
          - May
          - June
          - July
          - August
          - September
          - October
          - November
          - December

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, May 11, 2021
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM August 2023

D4. (+) Surface water quality=>

(-) Pesticides

(-) Nutrients

(-) Organics

(-) Pathogens

(-) Heavy metals

(-) Petroleum

Initial setting: Agricultural lands where a water 

table or surface water can be managed to 

improve soil and water quality, plant growth, or 

wildlife habitat.

1.2 (-) 

Oxidation of 

organic soils

D3 (+) Soil 

environment for 

vegetative growth

I.3 (-) Subsidence 

(+) Soil health

D.2. (+) Seasonal 

retention of water

D.6 (+) Groundwater quality=>

(-) Pesticides

(-) Nutrients

(-) Organics

(-) Pathogens

I.7 (+) Plant health

I.10 (+) 

Waterfowl and 

wildlife habitats

D.1 (-) 

Wind 

erosion

C.2 (+) Health of humans, 

domestic and wild animals

Drainage Water Management (554)

1. The rate of outflow and the level of 

the surface and/or subsurface water in 

drainage systems are managed with 

water control structures and/or pumps

C.5 (+/-) 

Biodiversity

D.5 (+) Cost of 

construction and 

operation and 

maintenance

C.1 (+/-) Air quality 

in the airshed

C.6 (+) 

Migratory 

waterfowl 

nesting and/or 

nesting habitat 

along flyways

I.1 (+) Air quality=>

(-) Particulate matter

(-) Ammonia (NH3) emissions

(-) Visibility; greenhouse gases=>

(-) Carbon dioxide CO2 emissions

C.4 (-/+) Income and income 

stability (individual and 

community)

I.4 (+) Seasonal 

shallow flooding

I.5 (+) Water 

temperature

I.6 (+/-) Aquatic 

habitats

I.8 (+) Potential income 

(-) Risk

C.3 (+) Quality of 

receiving waters

C.7 (+) Recreational 

opportunities

Start

ULEGEND

#. Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Surface Drainage, Main or 

Lateral (608)

Subsurface Drain (606)

Waste Recycling (633)

I.9 (+/-) Net return 

to producer

Nutrient Management (590)
#### Johns and another, Respondents, vs. City of Platteville, Appellant.

*May 1*—

May *21, 1914.*

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Grant county: Geoege Clementson, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*R. A. Goodeil,*for the appellant.

*Calvert Bpensley,*for the respondents.

Vinje, J.

This case presents the same questions as the preceding case of *Carthew v. Platteville,*ante, p. 322, 147 N. W. 375, and is ruled by it.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
IES Results Sanitized