alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1344 

To clarify that nonprofit organizations such as Habitat for Humanity can 

accept donated mortgage appraisals, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 14, 2015 

Mr. PORTMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To clarify that nonprofit organizations such as Habitat for 

Humanity can accept donated mortgage appraisals, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM TRUTH IN LENDING ACT. 

4 Section 129E(i)(2) of the Truth in Lending Act is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and 

7 (B) as clauses (i) and (ii), respectively; 

8 (2) by striking ‘‘For purposes of’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1344 IS

1 ‘‘(B) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION RELATED

2 TO APPRAISAL DONATIONS.—In the case of an 

3 appraisal for which the appraiser voluntarily 

4 does not receive a fee, the appraiser is not, and 

5 shall not be construed to be, with respect to the 

6 donated appraisal, a fee appraiser for purposes 

7 of this section.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Opinion issued August 31, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-00172-CV

———————————

ROYAL AC, INC., Appellant

V.

DEBORAH GREEN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 295th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2017-09514

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Royal AC, Inc., has failed to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to 

file brief). Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal due to appellant’s failure 

to file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). 
2

More than ten days have elapsed since the filing of the motions. See TEX. R. APP. P.

10.3(a). Appellant did not respond, and a brief has not been filed. Accordingly, we 

grant the motion and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.3(b). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Lloyd.
IIEADOUARTERS STRATEGIC MR C0174 AND

UNITED F.TATES AIR FORCE

arryTT AT POPCI. ucnnAsgA •

General Thomas D. White

Chief of Staff

United States Air Force

Washington 25, D. C.

Dear Tommy

2 JUN 1960

Reference is made to your letter of 16 June regarding the need to

develop some well-organised interim plans for exploitation of any

possible data from Reconnaissance Satellite tests. My immediate

concern lies in the responsibility you have placed on SAC to have

a processing capability available in time for the SAMOS launches

scheduled to begin in September.

As you know, the processing of any take from the R&D launches

was to have been carrie.1 cut by a joint ARDC-SAC effort. This

was to be accomplished at a facility to be established here at

Offutt and designated as "Early-Fix". Recently, the funds for

this project were frozen. Therefore, thie facility cannot be made

available in time for the first few firings.

As a result of the funds freeze action, we have developed a plan to

provide a processing capability sufficient for the R&D launches.

This plan consists of three steps or phases that will minimise any

slippages in construction programs. Step I will utilize existing

personnel, equipment and facilities of the 544th Reconnaissance

Technical Group here at this headquarters. This capability is

already in being with the exception of a few items of equipment

peculiar to the SAMOS system. These items are scheduled for

completion prior to the first launch and can be readily installed in

the existing facility of the 544th RTG. This arrangement can take

care of the immediate situation, and adequately process the data

from the first few launches. Hoi/ever, as the number of launches

increases, it is essential that the balance of the SAMOS equipment

be installed in the "Early-Fix" facility (Step II) in an orderly
progression. Since the 4999th Data Processing Squadron (ARDC)

has been activated at Offutt and has already been partially manned

there will be no interruption in changing from Step I to Step II.

Step III provides the equipments and facilities necessary for final

system evaluation and makes optimum utilisation of all expenditures

incurred in Step U. This over-all plan provides for the growth of

the system in an austere manner. It further provides for growth

in an operational intelligence environment that dons not exist elsewhere.

Since receipt of your letter of 16 June a message from your headquarters to AFRCE-MR directs immediate termination of the "EarlyFix" construction contract. It is important that this directive be

rescinded and the attached proposal be implemented as soon as

feasible.

I am attaching a copy of this plan for your information. I have sent

the original to General Schriever with the recommendation that it

be incorporated in the new SAMOS exploitation plan. It should then

provide the means of accomplishing, our dual responsibilities in a

mutually acceptable manner.

Sincerely

THOMAS S. POWER 1 Atch

General, USAF Cy of Plan

Commander in Chief
Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors
CNET, Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on 
Forms S-8 (File Nos.333-07667, 333-34491 and 333-67325) and Forms S-3
(File Nos. 333-46203, 333-56633 and 333-73023) of CNET, Inc. of our
of our report dated February 9, 1999, except as to paragraph 5 of
footnote 5 and footnote 10 which are as of March 22, 1999, and our
report on Schedule dated March 22, 1999, relating to consolidated
balance sheets of CNET, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the 
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, which report appears 
in the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of CNET, Inc.


                                            KPMG LLP


San Francisco, California
March 31, 1999
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03255]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Initial Review

    The meeting announced below concerns Comparison and Validation of 
Screening Tools for Substance Use Among Pregnant Women, DP15-003, 
initial review.
    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

Time and Date

9:00 a.m.-6:30 p.m., March 18, 2015 (Closed)

    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c) (4) and (6), title 5 U.S.C., 
and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services 
Office, CDC, pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463.
    Matters for Discussion: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response 
to ``Comparison and Validation of Screening Tools for Substance Use 
among Pregnant Women, DP15-003, initial review.''
    Contact Person for More Information: M. Chris Langub, Ph.D., 
Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway NE., Mailstop F-80, 
Atlanta, Georgia 30341, Telephone: (770) 488-3585, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#77323238413714131459101801"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d99c9c96ef99babdbaf7beb6af">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2015-03255 Filed 2-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
TOPSEGRET---

n

01111111111i

IS) NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON, O.C. 111111111111111

•

THE NRO STAFF October 22, 1970

MEMORANDUM FOR COLONEL SWEENEY

Attached is our first cut at the briefing for

Secretary Rogers. Both John Hughes and General Bennett

have seen the charts and agree that it is a good briefing.

John has an agreement from General Bennett on their outline, and it will mesh well with ours. I will pass his

outline on to you when I receive it. DIA plans to give

a viewgraph briefing, and I intend to make our presentation

the same.

We have no firm indication of a date for the presentation. I am in touch with Bill McAfee at State, who

wants to wait until Dr. Cline returns (Monday) to ask him

about the date and any special areas of interest we should

cover in the briefing.

I would like to propose that I present this briefing to

the Secretary. This would serve two purposes. First,

John Hughes would like to do the same for the DIA briefing

but feels reluctant if only principals are present. Second,

it would permit you and Dr. McLucas to field questions and

make additional comments without being directly in the firing

line. May I?

Ors

Attachment

Proposed Briefing

40P-SEGRETg aciemis •omo •J•Ipa•nc RIGID•MM.

C0%100110 Internal

COM0* corn

"6"
---TOP-SECRET--

November 4, 1970.

OUTLINE FOR PRESENTATION

TO

SECRETARY OF STATE

*November 17, 1970

Dr. McLucas' Presentation -- 20 minutes

Part I - 5 minutes

I Overview . purpose of overall briefing

method of presentation

Dr. McLucas: history, policy,

organization and collection operations

of NRP

Adm Gayler's, Gen Bennett's areas

II History of the NRP

covert, denied area reconnaissance

operates aircraft, drones, and satellites

•

responsive to USIB requirements

evolution

III Satellite Reconnaissance Policy

NSAM 156 recommenGations

Presidential reaffirmation

-TOP-SECREF

01411111111 IMO 01111111MIC •ssammus

11141011111 ISM 10 ISIS WWI Immo

CO MO

1111//, PAM
IV Organization

DOD/CIA co-ownership

Executive Committee

Director

Program Offices

V Reviewing Agencies

USIB

OS&T

PFIAB

Part II - 15 minutes

VI Introduction to Collection Systems

VII Photographic Systems

aircraft, drones and satellites

search & surveillance, high resolution

•

systems

operations

future systems

VIII SIGINT Systems

primarily satellites

search, surveillance, technical intelligence

-TOP-SECREF--

Minn WIN MIRMIUMIC •11•1111•1110

essionm use as sets ow *Pm,

CONIMIL

CS?? 55OWNIS

NUS
operations

future systems

IX Requirements

established by USIB

COMIREX

SOBS

overflight approvals

crisis response

Satisfaction

photo systems

search & surveillance

high resolution

SIGINT systems.

XI Summary and Introduction of Adm Gayler

NOTE: Dr. McLucas may circulate 8 x 10 photographs of

typical system hardware

:41040.. 

TOP-SECREF- COMIS

mums neat aelealalliC ma. PINK of PAW

tW 111111C1701 1250 se NIS IOW *MA
"offer" to reduce the NRP by s

to which I took strong exception . 111111111W

CONTROL PA

CONTROL NO_L.nternal

COPY OF COPIES

PAGE-1- OF I- PAGES

SAL DECIONIIPIMP ICMCLUI PRO S PAMCl

OR01115 11482 ISSUPTNIN CATE.

V sat oacussawv an 211P DST

—eat-NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D C.

11111011211Firul

THE NRO STAF F 14 March 1975

MEMDRA UM FOR MR. PLUMMER

SUBJ SAMSO Survivability Briefing

A 1400 this afternoon, AF/RDS will present a SAMSO

briefi g on Air Force Space Mission Survivability which has

been p esented to the Air Staff Board and is being sponsored

to the Air Force Council with some changes recommended by

Genera Greenleaf.

en this briefing was presented to the Air Staff Board,

I fulf lied a personal commitment made by General Kulpa to

Genera Greenleaf and presented an NRO overview, ostensibly

for in ormation only, with a two-chart summary of our vulnerabilit efforts. The 30 minutes I had planned actually lasted

over a hour and a half and the ensuing discussions concerned:

There w

and the

purpose.

s no expressed interest in our vulnerability efforts,

entire discussion was out of context of the announced

AF

Council

asked t

informa

RDS is preparing the SAMSO briefing for the Air Force

and, through the Space Panel, General Greenleaf has

at General Stelling and I again precede it with an

Tonal overview space briefing. I would welcome your

-+v
guidance that an NRO overview is not appropriate to that

body sitting in a decision role and that we should rather

present the NRO briefing to any individual members of the

Council who may request it.

I am very concerned that the same dialogue may occur,

or be prompted, and that the Council might be disposed to

provide guidance, direction, or decision that would be

inappropriate in terms of Air Force support to the NRO or

our own vulnerability efforts. Once given, such guidance

or direction could be difficult to handle gracefully.

Finally, one of the SAMSO briefing charts

ability has been modified, at General Greenlee

to include our programs, but because of11111111111111111111111Nalm

111111111111111111e feel that it may raise morequestrirlir

it will answer.

111111111111111111111

Colonel, USAF

Director

.„,,Dele,112.02 woe yaw

einalum sac IINCV 04 01.

011110111 INV ilmiwtall%

May 21111144141610 • 0%.11•011 I

CONTROL NO Internal

COPT OF COT •£S

PAGE _2__ PAGES
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM August 2023

Irrigation and Drainage Tailwater Recovery (447)

Initial setting: Land, where 

recoverable irrigation runoff and/or 

rainfall runoff flows can be 

anticipated under current or 

expected management practices. 

Start

1. Collection reservoir and associated facilities 

(collection, storage, conveyance)

Pond Sealing or 

Lining, 

Geomembrane 

or Geosynthetic 

Clay Liner (521)

I.1 (+/-) Contaminant 

transport to receiving 

waters

I.7 (-) Source 

water usage

C.4 (+/-) Fish and wildlife habitat C.1 (+/-) Water 

quality

C.3 (+/-) Income and income stability 

(individuals and community)

I.9 (+/-) Net 

return

I.11 (+/-) Ground 

water recharge

C.2 (+) Irrigation water use efficiency

I.8 (+/-) Water for 

other downstream 

uses

I.6 (-) Energy 

use (pumping)

Irrigation Water 

Management (449)

D.1 (+) 

Contaminants 

in tailwater

I.4 (+) Sediment 

and pollutant 

retention 

D.3 (+) Irrigation tailwater 

collection, storage, and 

recycling

D.2 (+) Exposed 

soil, erosion

I.2 (-) Runoff 

(offsite)

Critical Area 

Planting (342)

I.3 (-) Erosion, 

sedimentation

I.5 (+) Recycled 

irrigation water

I.10 (+/-) Wetland 

benefits

D.5 (+/-) Acres 

of wetland

D.4 (+) Cost of 

installation, operation, 

and maintenance
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Inherited Disease Research Access Committee.                    

*Date:*                         March 6, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Camilla E. Day, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, CIDR, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4075, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-8837,                         *camilla.day@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 10, 2015.

David Clary,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-03212 Filed 2-17-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### Will of Trzebiatowski: Clarke, Executor, Appellant, vs. Drewek, Respondent.

For the. appellant: *Clarke & Clarke*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: /. *C. Gamroth,*attorney, and *John A. Kluwin, John H. Schlosser,*and *Bendinger & Hayes*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Order affirmed.
# C_2005138EN.01001402.xml

| 7.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/14

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3736 — EQT/GSCP/ISS/JV)

(2005/C 138/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 3 May 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3736. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3736. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, J. Leland Strange, the Chief Executive Officer of Intelligent Systems
Corporation, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended June 30, 2004 of Intelligent Systems Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and we have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by such report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors:  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 13, 2004
    
    /s/
    
    J. Leland StrangeJ. Leland StrangeChief Executive Officer