alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2015

Order 

November 25, 2015

152025(22)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v

JAMES SCOTT NEWMAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

SC: 152025

COA: 327000

Livingston CC: 14-021983-FC; 

14-021984-FC

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the second motion of defendant-appellant to extend 

the time for filing a supplemental brief is GRANTED IN PART. The supplemental brief 

will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before December 9, 2015, not 

December 25, 2015 as requested.
1 pith reference to your letter of 14 June 1960 ca this.

subject, CIA has the following requirements for materials and fac.
ilities to permit us to exploit reconnaissance
system during the initial phase of the BANDS

! a. One ec

y, | the photography, 1.0., determining longitule
ay | 0.» of the primary Pe ertgTuining Longitade,

tha e. A complete index of coverage on the ground by pass
' denoting longitude, latitude, time plus tilt, tip, swing, and altitude,
calibrated focal, length and precise scale factor. It is assumed the

, SAWS Processing Center is equipped to hantle the
: Of the satellite in such a manner that the
either machine tape or human language

. ot gf. One copy of the preliminary
as ,SAMO5 Processing Center in the form of an
„:.
, • '

****

r.

 . - •

•,

.0•••

..tkt •

:•‘11.4. "*"

•

-1 .44_ 4.4 .50
3 'it'

t.

t;

•Rft t1

P4* t4 ",' teci.

i4 '7 4,
. .•7;!
S:'!!'. tvg► •
-

^ •^f• ^^r- ..?i'. f . ' ,;a

•;. 'tea .St^.•._. r....._ .__. .:.._ _
******Exhibit  23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm****

The Board of Directors   Gold Banc Corporation, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation  by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-74594, 333-80751, 333-78871  and 333-34152) on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 24, 2005, with respect  to the consolidated balance sheets of Gold Banc Corporation, Inc. as of December  31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’  equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the  three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and management’s assessment  of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December  31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting  as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual  report on Form 10-K of Gold Banc Corporation, Inc. Our report refers to the  disposition of CompuNet Engineering, Inc. in 2004. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Kansas City, Missouri  March 24, 2005 

 

 

  

----
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

CNET Networks, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statements (Nos. 333-127785, 333-19997, 333-19962, 333-15569, 333-105563, 333-90739, 333-85374, 333-65224, 333-58724, 333-35458, 333-78247, 333-67325, 333-34491, 333-07671, 333-07667) on Forms S-8 and S-3 of CNET Networks, Inc. of our
report dated March 16, 2006, except as to Note 2, which is at January 29, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of CNET Networks, Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders equity, cash flows, and comprehensive income for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, and the related financial statement schedule, and the report dated March 16, 2006 with
respect to managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2005 which reports appear in the December 31, 2005, amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of CNET Networks, Inc.

As discussed in Note 2, the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the restated consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005 have been restated.



|                         
|-------------------------
|KPMG LLP                 
|                         
|San Francisco, California
|January 26, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           1,796
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,420
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,356
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,921
<PP&E>                                          23,742
<DEPRECIATION>                                (18,292)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,408
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,908
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,025
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54,408
<SALES>                                         12,172
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,863
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,956
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,061
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    806
<INCOME-TAX>                                       838
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (32)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (32)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
|

LBQ-1 FROM TBs * DATE ah Dec 58 COMMENT NO. 1

INTER NERADED
‘Th Program Dect ages Woz AT 12 y,
We 117% Pro SSI Ey TOMA EAR .
Ding fCALLy
Letter Contract AF 04(647)-181: - (UNCL) ® 820019

Subject letter contract was handcarried to Hq AMC on 21 December 1958
for final review by MCPC. Subject letter contract will be Supplemental
Agreement #10 to Contract AF 04(647)-97.

Hiring Date: (SBGRER)
The first Discoverer firing date has now been established as 6 January

1959., Delay in the firing date has been attributed to difficulties in
checkout of the stands and blockhouse equipment.

Reprogremming: (UNCL)
A reprogramming exercise is currently under way as a result of
discussions with ARPA. New schedules have been presented to the contractor

and it is currently planned to price these schedules for presentation to ’
ARPA during the latter part of Jamary 1959.

Industrial Facilities Meeting: (UNCL)

A meeting was held on 23 December 1956 with representatives fron
Lockheed Aircraft Corporation, AFEMD, Directorate of Resources (IBI) and -
this Directorate to discuss IMSD additional FY 59 industrial facility require
ments, The contractor personnel presented a supplement to the approved
Facilities Appendix consisting of approximately 30 items with estimated costs
of approximately $2 million dollars. However, only three of the items were
considered adequately justified by the contractor for approval. The dollar
value of these items was estimated to be approximately $70,000. In general,
the contractor failed to relate the specific needs for the item requested
to the accelerated WS 117L program on which basis the facilities are being
provided.

Pad
.

DD 1 Filho 96 REPLACES NME FORM 96, 1 OCT 48, WHICH MAY BE USED
#### Anonymous.

The declaration stated an undertaking by two with a third) to. run a race with him, and to pay him if he won *563The evidence was, of a race made between one of the two and the third ; for performance whereof, the other of two became his. surety on I lie day of the race.

*Per curiam,*

This is a fata! variance — you should have stated the contract as it really was. *Mr. Taylor*for the Plaintiff insisted, he could maintain it, and prayed time for thar purpose. So a special case was *made;*and af-terwards, in this term, the court calling the cause, *Mr. Taylor*declined arguing' it, and the Plaintiff was non-suited.

*Note.*— Vide *Buller's Nisi Prius,*145.
NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON, D.C.

OFFICE OF THE. DIRECTOR May 8, 1989

Malat=Pal

Dear Dr. Paine:

I would very much appreciate the opportunity to brief you on

the National Reconnaissance Program and to discuss relationships

bétween our organizations. The briefing I have in mind would be

one originally prepared for the Secretary and Deputy Secretary of

Defense and lasts 1 1/2 to 2 hours. Will your schedule permit a

get-together some time during the next two weeks?

Sincerely, 411•1111)

Dr. Thomas O. Paine

Administrator

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Washington, D. C.

2820-69

,COPSIS

nen

. 9C S Q -

mums nom Asneaasic eisamms

oft smseuvit use to men 11111.1,
---------151-NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

THE NRO STAFF April 23, 1969

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. McLUCAS

SUBJECT: NRP Briefing to Dr. Thomas 0. Paine

Background:

We have never briefed Dr. Thomas O. Paine, Administrator

of NASA, on the National Reconnaissance Program. This situation was allowed to develop because (1) Dr. Paine was the

Acting Administrator and (2) his staff concurred that there

was no urgency in briefing someone who apparently would head

NASA for three or four months, at most.

Current Situation:

Dr. Paine's staff now urges us to brief him, recommending

one hour on hardware, a half-hour on policy, and a half-hour

for discussion. I have prepared a letter for your signature,

inviting him to such a briefing. Prior to that date, we will

brief you on DOD-NASA relationships.

Recommendation:

That you sign the letter to Dr. Paine.

Colonel, USAF

--TOP-SECRET'

0[1.1.011 0 110111 at1110.00 110001110006

001 Mel VI. II ft 00 • 0 DOCS bOT 0001.
# C_2005010EN.01000101.xml

| 14.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 January 2005

(2005/C 10/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3232 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,71 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4404 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,70300 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0481 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5479 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 82,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1860 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5816 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,389 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,91 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6965 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4330 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0717 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 38 132 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,77 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,595 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7968 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7283 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5917 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3132 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8759 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1557 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 371,70 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,9230 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3232

JPY

Japanese yen

135,71

DKK

Danish krone

7,4404

GBP

Pound sterling

0,70300

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0481

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5479

ISK

Iceland króna

82,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1860

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5816

CZK

Czech koruna

30,389

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,91

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6965

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4330

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0717

ROL

Romanian leu

38 132

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,77

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,595

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7968

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7283

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5917

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3132

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8759

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1557

KRW

South Korean won

1 371,70

ZAR

South African rand

7,9230

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that the Quarterly  Report of Edison  Renewables,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB for the period  ended  December  31, 2003 fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended,  and that  information  contained in such  Quarterly  Report on Form
10-QSB fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Dated: February 12, 2004                        /s/ Paul Steo
       ---------------------                    --------------------------------
                                                Paul Steo
                                                Chief Executive Officer and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit (10)(a)



 Exhibit 10(a) 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 
 We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Supplement to the Prospectus and to the use of
our reports: (1) dated March 28, 2008, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company, (2) dated March 28, 2008, with respect to the statutory-basis
financial statements and schedules of Transamerica Life Insurance Company, (3) dated August 5, 2008, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Life Investors Insurance Company of America and (4) dated
March 21, 2008, with respect to the financial statements of the subaccounts of Separate Account VA-5, which are available for investment by contract owners of the Distinct Assets Variable Annuity, included in Amendment No. 8 to the
Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08158) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and related Supplement to the Prospectus and Supplement to the Statement of Additional Information of Distinct Assets Variable Annuity. 
 /s/    Ernst & Young LLP 
 Des
Moines, Iowa 
 September 26, 2008
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT DELANEY E. SM ITH, JR ., Pha rm a D M D, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. C OUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 14-55189 D.C . No. 2:11-c v-04996-PA-FM O M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Pe rc y Ande rson, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

June 14, 2016 ** B e fore : B EA, WATFORD, a nd FRIEDLAND, C irc uit Judge s. De la ne y E. Sm ith, Jr. a

ppe a ls pro sefrom

the distric t c ourt’ s Ja

nua ry 3, 2014 orde r striking docum e nts from the doc ke t. W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie wfor an a buse of disc re tion. R e a dy Transp., Inc . v . AAR Mfg.,



# FIL ED JUN 23 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Inc . , 627 F.3d 402, 404 (9th C ir. 2010). W e a ffirm .

The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion in e xe rc ising its inhe re nt powe r to strikeSm i th’ s filings from the doc ke t be c a

use the y we re file d ne a

rly thirte e n m onths a fte r the distric t c ourt c lose d the c a s e , a nd the distric t c ourt ha d pre viously dire c te d the distric t c ourt c le rk to re je c t a ny future filings tha

t Sm ith m a de in the c a se . Se eid . (e xpla ining tha t fe de ra l distric t c ourts ha ve the “ inhe re nt powe r to c ontrol the ir doc k e t” (inte rna l quota tion m arks a

nd c ita tions omitte d)). W e la c k jurisdic tion to c onside r any of the distric t c ourt’ s prior rulings be c a use Sm ith fa ile d to file a tim e ly notic e of a

ppe a l. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 4(a)(1) (a notic e of a

ppe a l m ust be file d within 30 da

y s a fte r the date of e ntry

of the judgm e nt). W e do not c onside r argum e nts ra ise d for the first tim e on a ppe a l. Se e Padge tt v . W

right , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n. 2 (9th C ir. 2009). All pe nding m otions a

nd re que sts a

re de n ie d. AFFIRM E D.

1 4 - 5 5 1 8 9 2
# C_2005082EN.01001801.xml

| 2.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/18

---

Action brought on 9 February 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Republic of Finland

(Case C-55/05)

(2005/C 82/37)

Language of the case: Finnish

An action against the Republic of Finland was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 9 February 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by M. Huttunen and K. Simonsson, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/84/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 November 2002 amending the Directives on maritime safety and the prevention of pollution from ships, (1) or at least by not communicating them to the Commission, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/84/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 November 2002 amending the Directives on maritime safety and the prevention of pollution from ships, (1) or at least by not communicating them to the Commission, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| 2. | order the Republic of Finland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Republic of Finland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The prescribed period for implementing the directive expired on 23 November 2003.

---

(1)  OJ L 324 of 29.11.2002, p. 53.

1

---
#### Cardine, Appellant, vs. Schaffenbuhl and another, Respondents.

*May 1*—

May *21, 1914.*

*Trespass: Title to land: Adverse possession: Findings*0/ *fact: Appeal: Review.*

In an action to restrain continuing trespasses, brought by one claiming title to land by adverse possession, questions of fact only being presented and the findings of the trial court being fairly supported by evidence, the judgment for defendants is affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Crawford ■county: Geobge ClbmbNtsoN, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Alexander*Athey, for the appellant.

Eor the respondents there was a brief by *Graves & Earll,*.and oral argument by *B. B. Graves.*

TimliN, J.

In this case, brought to restrain continuing ¡trespasses, the plaintiff owned block 19 in the recorded Union Plat of Prairie du Chien, and claimed that by adverse possession his south boundary extended across Cedar street, which lies south of said block, and included a part of block 18, which lies south of that part of Cedar street. This plat was recorded in 1856 and was made by certain persons claiming to own the lands to be platted. Some of the questions argued by appellant are not in the case because there is no evidence to show which of the original French claims or what part of such claim or claims covered that part of the ground platted into blocks 18 and 19, and because the plaintiff and •defendant both claim under the plat mentioned. Cedar street between blocks 18 and 19 has not been opened for -travel, but west of this it has. We find no question presented by the evidence except a claim on the part of the plaintiff that his south boundary was by adverse possession extended so as to take in Cedar street and a portion of the *320north part of block 18. Upon this part tbe trespasses are alleged to have been committed. As against this tbe defendant offered evidence tending to show that plaintiff’s possession was not exclusive or continuous, was not for tbe requisite length of time, and lack of inclosure, and also that defendant bad possession. There was contradictory and conflicting evidence in support of tbe respective claims of tbe parties, and tbe case presented for the decision of tbe court below questions of fact only.. Tbe findings are fairly supported by evidence, and tbe judgment must be affirmed.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.