alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE HOUSTON EXPLORATION COMPANY SET FORTH IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,645
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,187
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,501
<PP&E>                                         982,949
<DEPRECIATION>                                 446,367
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 569,452
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,743
<BONDS>                                        313,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           239
<OTHER-SE>                                     192,291
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   569,452
<SALES>                                        127,124
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               128,247
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  237,090
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,597
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (113,440)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (40,754)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (72,686)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (72,686)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.05)
        

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 22-30458

State of Louisiana; Louisiana State Racing 

Commission; Louisiana Horsemen’s Benevolent &

Protective Association 1993 Incorporated; Louisiana 

Thoroughbred Breeders Association; Jockeys Guild 

Incorporated; State of West Virginia; West Virginia 

Racing Commission; Bernard K. Chatters; Edward J. 

Fenasci; Larry Findley, Sr.; Warren Harang, III; Gerard 

Melancon

Plaintiffs—Appellees,

versus

Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority, 

Incorporated; Lisa Lazarus; Steve Beshear; Adolpho

Birch; Leonard S. Coleman, Jr.; Joseph De Francis; 

Ellen McClain; Susan Stover; Bill Thomason; D.G. Van 

Clief; Federal Trade Commission; Lina M. Kham; 

Alvaro Bedoya; Rebecca Kelly Slaughter; Christine S. 

Wilson

Defendants—Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 6:22-CV-1934

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 18, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-30458 Document: 00516550451 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/18/2022
No. 22-30458

2

Before King, Duncan, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The states of Louisiana and West Virginia, joined by various

horseracing organizations and other individuals (collectively, “plaintiffs”), 

sued under the Administrative Procedure Act to enjoin rules approved by the 

Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) pursuant to the Horseracing Integrity 

and Safety Act (“HISA”).

1 Agreeing with the plaintiffs, the district court 

enjoined the rules and the defendants timely appealed. On August 3, 2022, 

our court granted a partial stay pending resolution of the appeal.

2

In a separate case decided today, our court has ruled that HISA is 

facially unconstitutional under the private non-delegation doctrine. See 

National Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association v. Black [National 

Horsemen’s], No. 22-10387, slip op. at 3–4 (5th Cir. Nov. 18, 2022).

Accordingly, we REMAND this case to the district court for further 

proceedings in light of National Horsemen’s. The partial stay is LIFTED.

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

1 Pub. L. No. 116–260, §§ 1201–12, 134 Stat. 1182, 3252–75 (2020) (codified at 15 

U.S.C. §§ 3051–60).

2 The stay suspended the injunction to the extent the district court found the rules 

generally violated the APA’s notice-and-comment requirements. The stay left the 

injunction in place, however, as to three specific rules that the district court found exceeded 

the FTC’s authority under HISA.

Case: 22-30458 Document: 00516550451 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/18/2022
AFS-10-375-E 

Sep 28 2010 

 Exemption No. 10146 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0836 

Mr. George Smith 

President 

Flight Training International, Inc. 

3401 Quebec Street, Suite 9150 

Denver, CO 80207 

Dear Mr. Smith: 

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our 

decision and explains its basis. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated August 12, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Flight Training International, Inc. (FTI), for an exemption from § 142.53(b) of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow FTI to use an 

alternative means of compliance consisting of simulator-based, approved line-oriented flight 

training in a simulator representative of the type of aircraft in which instruction will be given. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to FTI. 

The FAA issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No. 7418 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that the intent of § 142.53(b) is to expose instructors to the actual flying environment, 

including realistic noise and sound, air traffic phraseology, procedures, and terminology, and 

airport signage and lighting. The FAA also found that by observing factors in a real 

environment, instructors also hear and derive situational awareness from other pilot reports 

and responses, including those delivered by short slang and incorrect phraseology that 

nonetheless have a bearing on situational awareness. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed denial 

of exemption; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby deny the petition of Flight Training International, Inc., 

for an exemption from §§ 142.53(b)(1), 142.53(b)(2)(i), and 142.53(b)(3)(i). 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service 

Enclosure
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                                        <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          28,650
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,931
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    203,922
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        466,577
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,645
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 735,616
<DEPOSITS>                                     633,327
<SHORT-TERM>                                    13,700
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,116
<LONG-TERM>                                     20,443
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,549
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,481
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 735,616
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 28,557
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,328
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   402
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                38,287
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              17,034
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,664
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           20,623
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,743
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  26
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 16,437
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,385
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,385
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,279
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.71
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.43
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,278
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,163
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,725
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,835
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,428
<RECOVERIES>                                       495
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,645
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             6,645
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0




</TABLE>
ae.
- mK See Si

ae 7 tt
eh a

thee py











, Qe Sabews te
@ sy

AIR. OE BALLISTIC MISGELE DEVISION (1 )
‘ UNITED STATES AIR FORCE idan) 0)
Air Force Unit Post Office, Los Angel 4,











ea

ors a iv ann — 10 ae pe! sei

Siar ae a eae a Se ee
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: February 2, 2015

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Bill Lamason, OAQPS

SUBJECT: Meeting with Energy Industries of Ohio 

SUMMARY

Phone call with Energy Industries of Ohio to discuss the Ultra Super Critical Technology and its 

direct relevance in achieving compliance with 111 EPA Rules.

ATTENDEES:

John Shingledecker - Electric Power Research Institute, Program Manager, Fossil Materials & 

Repair Program

Jeff Phillips - Senior Program Manager, Electric Power Research Institute

Revis James - Director Generation R&D Sector, Electric Power Research Institute

Ram Narula - Chief Technology Officer, for Energy Industries of Ohio

Bob Purgert - President, Energy Industries of Ohio

Chris Sinagra - Legislative Affairs, Energy Industries of Ohio

Nick Hutson, EPA

Ravi Srivastava, EPA

Steve Fruh, EPA

Christian Fellner, EPA

Bill Lamason, EPA

Lisa Conner, EPA

Bob Wayland, EPA
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 33 (Thursday, February 19, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8887-8888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03345]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections

[[Page 8888]]

552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant 
applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; Pediatric Cardiac Genomics Consortium.
    Date: March 11, 2015.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Garden Inn Washington DC/Bethesda, 7301 Waverly 
Street, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: YingYing Li-Smerin, MD, Ph.D, Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7184, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7924, 301-435-0277, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2b474258464e5942456b454347494205454243054c445d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c60657f61697e65624c6264606e6522626564226b637a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 12, 2015.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-03345 Filed 2-18-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Memo to: EPA Docket (EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0218)

Subject: Copyrighted reference provided by Ms. Kay Hawklee in oral comments at Public Hearing 

about the proposed rulemaking “National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants (NESHAPs)-Radon from Operating Uranium Mill Tailings”, Subpart W of 40 

CFR Part 61. 

Ms Kay Hawklee provided hearing panel with the following reference in her oral comments delivered in 

the Subpart W Public Hearing held in Denver, Colorado, on September 4, 2014: 

Mudd, Gavin M. 2008. "Radon Releases from Australian Uranium Mining and Milling Projects: 

Assessing the UNSCEAR Approach." Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 99 288-315. 

The abstract of the reference is as follows— 

Abstract 

The release of radon gas and progeny from the mining and milling of uranium-bearing ores has long 

been recognised as a potential radiological health hazard. The standards for exposure to radon and 

progeny have decreased over time as the understanding of their health risk has improved. In recent 

years there has been debate on the long-term releases (10,000 years) of radon from uranium mining 

and milling sites, focusing on abandoned, operational and rehabilitated sites. The primary purpose has

been estimates of the radiation exposure of both local and global populations. Although there has been

an increasing number of radon release studies over recent years in the USA, Australia, Canada and 

elsewhere, a systematic evaluation of this work has yet to be published in the international literature. 

This paper presents a detailed compilation and analysis of Australian studies. In order to quantify radon 

sources, a review of data on uranium mining and milling wastes in Australia, as they influence radon 

releases, is presented. An extensive compilation of the available radon release data is then assembled

for the various projects, including a comparison to predictions of radon behaviour where available. An

analysis of cumulative radon releases is then developed and compared to the UNSCEAR approach. The 

implications for the various assessments of long-term releases of radon are discussed, including aspects 

such as the need for ongoing monitoring of rehabilitation at uranium mining and milling sites and lifecycle accounting.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                            18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of SK Telecom Co., Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 20-F/A for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Kil Seung Son, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Young Jin Kim, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Kil Seung Son
------------------------------
Name:  Kil Seung Son
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  JUNE 30, 2003


/s/ Young Jin Kim
------------------------------
Name:  Young Jin Kim
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  JUNE 30, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# C_2005019EN.01001801.xml

| 22.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/18

---

Removal from the register of Case C-92/04 (1)

1

(2005/C 19/40)

(Language of the case: Italian)

(Language of the case: Italian)

By order of 30 September 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-92/04: Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic.

---

(1)  OJ C 94 of 17.4.2004.

1

---
Appeal Dismissed and Memor andum Opinion filed December 11 , 2018
.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -00258- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF F.S.C., A CHILD
On Appeal from the County Court No. 3 Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 07- FD -0721

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N This is an appeal from a judgment signed April 6, 2018. The clerk’s record was filed August 6, 2018

. The reporter’s record was filed September 28, 2018

. No brief was filed. On November 6 , 2018 , this court issued an order stating that unle ss appellant filed a brief on or before November 21 , 2018 , the court would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(b). Appellant filed no brief or other response. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Busby, Brown, and Wise

.
http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Using the NRCS Web Soil Survey: Free Public Access to the Nation’s Soil Resource Data

The NRCS Soil Science Division has transitioned from its 

traditional, static soil surveys published in bound hard

copy to a more fluid online format that allows NRCS to 

continually update soil survey data as needed and from 

which customers can create custom soil survey reports 

for just their area of interest. 

NRCS implemented the Web Soil Survey 

(http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/) in 2005. Web Soil 

Survey allows customers to prepare reports for their 

particular area of interest, save a digital copy, and/or 

print a copy. During FY 2010, the first year for which 

statistics are available, over 135,000 custom reports 

were developed by customers. In FY 2011, over 155,000 

reports were developed. It is anticipated that about 

175,000 custom reports will be generated in FY 2012.

Not all users of soil survey information generate custom 

reports. About 800,000 single-theme reports or 

interpretive maps were generated in both FY 2010 and 

FY 2011. In FY 2010, about 1.7 million individuals 

accessed Web Soil Survey, and in FY 2011, about 1.8 

million people used it.

As of February 2012, Web Soil Survey has enjoyed 9.2 

million visitors to the site. By not producing hard-copy 

soil surveys, NRCS has saved the tax payers over 2 

million dollars in printing costs.

About 92 percent of private and tribal lands are covered 

by soil surveys. There are currently 28 soil surveys 

underway. These soil surveys and maps will be 

completed in digital format and made available on the 

Web Soil Survey. In addition to these 28 soil surveys, 

updates are being done on soil survey data across the 

country to allow better interpretation of soil behavior 

for specific uses and for emerging issues, such as

climate change and nutrient management.

This online application for accessing soil data permits a 

more efficient delivery of USDA programs. Updating 

existing data on an ongoing basis has allowed rapid 

responses to new demands, including responses to the 

recent disasters of Hurricane Katrina and the Gulf oil 

spill.