alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

DECLASSIFIED BY: C/IART 

DECLASSIFIED ON: 9 JULY 2012 

- ,: .... 

·~.=::~t·lat:l~:~~t~!,.~~,.~~:·:. 

r;;;1t"~ .'1. .~.a.. .. ";"" ·l;<iu;A'1;... .. ...;..:,.i· ......... · 'Iii(,.f{I~ j({'ar~~~~ :~~~.~. 
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

DECLASSIFIED BY: C/IART 

DI!CLA551FII!D ON: 9 .JULY 2012 

/' 

• ' .. 1" ~jL.C~~Ll 

. __ 

.' .. ton ~~~ ___ ~~,~~:.,t:""'-.>"""', &wt ...... .... ,LIeM*-.. .' '.' ...... .. , ..... : . ,,: ' .. ,' 

, .~ ::., " 

:. : .... 

• ,.J " 

~=JS::,~::~~~ ..... 

ii~~J_f.I;;;~.·> .• ;> .,' .. . ~ .'.'.":.' ,. 

·r··-=·=--== .. ~ltj'~im<: . 

. .: ' . 

. '," .,.,.: 

... : .' 

.. ,. "." .. ' 

,.; . -, .... .......... : :" ," '. 

. ..~ ':, ':.. :. . "" . ", ~ •.... , ...... '::F": -;. ..•.. ... : .... : 

.. :.:: ...... ,.: ... . 

...... : 

.. . ...... :.~' 

. . . 

.. ::4tJ- " ., .... :; 

·· .. t .. 

.. __ ._--.-------
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of SK Telecom Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: April 30, 2014 |  | /s/ Sung Min Ha                      
|                      |  | Sung Min Ha                          
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
99-286.

#### State v. Williams.

Lake App. No. 97-L-191. On discretionary appeal and on motion for admission *pro hoc vice.*Appeal allowed and motion granted.
National Reconnaissance Office Release

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Release #08-19

Contact: (703) 808-5050 December 11, 2019

NRO awards two commercial integration study contracts

The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) announced today the award of two data integration 

study contracts, one to Capella Space, for commercial synthetic aperture radar (SAR), and the 

other to Hawkeye 360, for commercial radio frequency (RF) remote sensing. 

These contracts represent an important milestone in the agency’s strategy of embracing both 

existing and emerging commercial geospatial providers to create an integrated overhead 

architecture consisting of both national and commercial capabilities. 

“The NRO is interested in better understanding the current capabilities of a variety of 

commercial vendors and assessing how those capabilities could potentially support the NRO’s 

national security mission,” said Pete Muend, director of the NRO Commercial Systems Program 

Office. “With these two contracts, we are exploring the integration of commercial SAR and RF in 

ordering and imagery delivery into the NRO architecture.” 

SAR is an active imaging system that operates at frequencies unaffected by weather. As such, 

SAR can penetrate clouds, darkness and inclement weather to provide situational awareness 

under most conditions. These capabilities make SAR valuable for a diverse range of 

applications including intelligence analysis, battlefield reconnaissance, land and ocean 

monitoring, and natural resource and agricultural monitoring and assessment. 

Commercial RF data collection and processing aims to provide analytics to identify and 

geolocate a broad set of RF signals, including broadcast messages such as shipborne 

Automatic Identification Systems. 

These integration study contracts will allow the NRO to evaluate the companies’ capabilities to 

meet NRO requirements. This helps the NRO effectively use the full breadth of commercial 

imagery providers’ capabilities across multiple phenomenologies. 

“These latest study contracts reflect the NRO’s commitment to full seamless enterprise

integration of multiple sources and diverse phenomenologies,” said Muend. 

The contracts to Capella Space and Hawkeye 360 join four commercial imagery studies 

previously awarded by the NRO to BlackSky, HySpecIQ, Maxar Technologies, and Planet. 

-NROThe NRO is the Intelligence Community element and Department of Defense agency responsible for 

developing, acquiring, launching, and operating America’s intelligence satellites to meet the national 

security needs of our nation.
[No. 24950.

Department One.

July 23, 1934.]

#### George H. Webb, *Respondent,*v. Agnes Webb, *Appellant.**1*

*Stratton & Kane (Herbert S. Little,*of counsel), for appellant.

*Shorett, Shorett & Taylor*and *Evans & McLaren,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 34 P. (2d) 920.

Mitchell, J.

This action was brought by George H. Webb against Agnes Webb for a divorce. Summons and complaint were personally served on her. Thereafter, an interlocutory decree of divorce was entered in favor of the plaintiff after an order of default had *310been duly entered against the defendant. Subsequently, the defendant moved to vacate the interlocutory decree taken by default, due, it was alleged, to inadvertence and excusable neglect on the part of the defendant. The motion was denied. The defendant has appealed.

It appears from the transcript filed in this court that affidavits were filed in the superior court for and against the granting of the motion to vacate the interlocutory decree of divorce, but the affidavits are in no way authenticated by the trial judge. The order denying the motion to vacate is general in its terms. There is no statement of facts or bill of exceptions covering the affidavits or the hearing upon the motion.

Such being the record, the respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal. Under our repeated holding’s, the motion will have to be granted. In *Marsh v. West Fir Logging Co.,*154 Wash. 137, 281 Pac. 340, we said:

> “No bill of exceptions or statement of facts has been brought before us. Several affidavits filed on behalf of appellants are contained in the transcript, but, as we have repeatedly held, affidavits cannot be considered by this court on appeal unless brought before us by bill of exceptions or statement of facts, so that it may be known that, in passing upon the rulings of the trial court sought to be reviewed, this court has before it evidence which was considered by the trial court in making the rulings complained of, and all of the material evidence upon which such ruling’s were based.”

To the same effect, see *Walker v. Walker,*151 Wash. 480, 276 Pac. 300; *Findel v. Chester,*169 Wash. 151, 13 P. (2d) 442.

The order appealed from was upon a question of fact, and cannot be reviewed without the testimony, *311■whether oral or by way of affidavits, being-brought here by bill of exceptions or statement of facts.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.

Beals, C. J., Main, Steinert, and Millard, JJ., concur.
AUSTIN. TEXAS 78711 

December 18, 1974 

The Honorable Raymond Vowel1 

Commissioner 

State Dept. of Public Welfare 

John H. Reagan Bldg. 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Opinion No. H- 480 

Re: Licensing requiremt:nt for 

administrators of publicly owned 

and operated chi,ld-care institutions. 

Dear Commissio~ner Vowell: 

You ask whether administrators of publicly owned and operated 

child-caring institutions must be licensed under article 695a-1, section 2, 

V. T. C. S., which provides: 

Beginning January 1, 1974, no person may serve as a 

child care administrator of a child-caring institution 

unless he holds a child care administrator’s license 

issued by the State Department of Public Welfare 

pursuant to this Act. 

“Child-caring institution” is defined in section 1 of article 695a-1 so as 

to specifically include public institutions. Thus, article 695a-1 plainly 

requires a child care administrator --the person who exercises administrative control and supervision and is responsible for programming and 

personnel,-- of a public child-caring institution to obtain a license from 

the Department of Public Welfare. 

Article 695c, section 8(a), V. T. C. S., requires owners of childcaring institutions to obtain a license to operate. State owned and 

operated institutions~are exempted from this requirement. V. T. C. S. 

art. 695c, $10. But the exemption of slate owned institutions from the 

licensing requirements of article 695~ does not affect the licensing 

p. 2179 
I. 

The Honorable Raymond Vowel1 page 2 (H-480) 

requirements for the administrators of all child-caring institutions 

established by article 695a-1. These two provisions operate 

independently of each other, and both can be effectuated at the same 

time. Under article 695a-1, then, administrators of publicly owned 

child-caring institutions must obtain a license from the Department 

of Public Welfare. 

SUMMARY 

Administrators of publicly owned and 

operated child-caring institutions must obtain 

a license from the State Department of Public 

Welfare. V. T. C. S. art. 695a-1, § 2. 

Very truly yours, 

Attorney General of Texas 

=:& 

DAVID M. KENDALL, First Assistant 

l?!iiiMd 

C. ROBERT HEATH, Chairman 

Opinion Committee 

lg 

pe 2180
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1362 

AN ACT 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to clarify 

waiver authority regarding programs of all-inclusive care 

for the elderly (PACE programs). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1362 ES

1 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY RE2 GARDING PACE PROGRAMS. 

3 Subsection (d)(1) of section 1115A of the Social Se4 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1315a) is amended by striking ‘‘and 

5 1903(m)(2)(A)(iii)’’ and inserting ‘‘1903(m)(2)(A)(iii), 

6 and 1934 (other than subsections (b)(1)(A) and (c)(5) of 

7 such section)’’. 

Passed the Senate August 5, 2015. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1362 

AN ACT 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to 

grams). all-inclusive care for the elderly (PACE proclarify waiver authority regarding programs of
**Exhibit 23.2****CONSENT OF NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.**We consent to the references to us and to estimates of reserves contained in “Part I, Item 1 and2. Business and Properties — Natural Gas and Oil Reserves” in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kof The Houston Exploration Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 and in HoustonExploration’s previously filed Registration Statements (and any prospectus supplement thereto)with file numbers as follows: (i) 333-78843 dated May 20, 1999, 333-113659 dated March 16,2004 and 333-120000 dated December 3, 2004, on Form S-3; (ii) 333-106836 dated December 4,2003, on Form 4; and (iii) 333-36977 dated October 1, 1997, 333-47370 dated October 5, 2000,333-59698 dated April 27, 2001, 333-75264 dated December 17, 2001, 333-99799 dated September19, 2002 and 333-117789 dated July 30, 2004, on Form S-8.       NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.         /s/ Danny D. Simmons     Danny D. Simmons
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8310-8311]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03083]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than March 3, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. David B. Pogrund, Chicago, Illinois, and Randy L. Green, 
Highland Park, Illinois, as co-trustees of 153 trusts for family 
members of the late Sanford Takiff, and acting in concert with the 
Takiff Family Foundation, Glencoe, Illinois, an Illinois not-for-profit 
corporation, controlled by its directors, Sherri Zirlin, Glencoe, 
Illinois; Elizabeth Scheinfeld, Glencoe, Illinois; Jill Hirsh, Glencoe, 
Illinois; and Bobette Takiff, Glencoe, Illinois; and Sherri Zirlin, 
individually; Elizabeth Scheinfeld, individually; and Jill Hirsh, 
individually, to retain all the outstanding voting stock of Bank of 
Highland Park Financial Corp., Highland Park, Illinois, and thereby 
indirectly control First Bank of Highland Park, Highland Park, 
Illinois.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Yvonne Sparks, Community 
Development Officer) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. HopFed Bancorp 2015 Employee Stock Ownership Plan with John E. 
Peck and Billy C. Duvall as trustees, all of Hopkinsville, Kentucky; to 
acquire voting shares of HopFed Bancorp, Inc., Hopkinsville, Kentucky 
and thereby indirectly acquire share of Heritage

[[Page 8311]]

Bank, USA, Inc., Hopkinsville, Kentucky.
    2. Wanda L. Rednour, individually, and as trustee of the Bypass 
Trust UWO John E. Rednour; to retain voting shares of Perry County 
Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Du Quoin 
State Bank, all of Du Quoin, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 10, 
2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-03083 Filed 2-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### Smith, Respondent, vs. Smith and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Olwell & Brady*and *George A. Gess-ner,*all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Michael Levin*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
Dennis Fitzgerald to be New NRO Deputy 

Director

August 3, 2001 

Dennis D. Fitzgerald was selected today as the new Deputy Director, National Reconnaissance 

Office by the Director of Central Intelligence George J. Tenet, with the concurrence of Secretary 

of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld. Fitzgerald is replacing David A. Kier who is retiring after 35 

years of federal service. 

Fitzgerald returns to the NRO from the Central Intelligence Agency where he was the Associate 

Deputy Director of the Directorate of Science and Technology. Fitzgerald had been Director of 

the NRO's Signal Intelligence Systems Acquisition and Operations Directorate from 1996 until 

June of this year when he moved over to CIA. "Mr. Fitzgerald brings a wealth of organizational 

knowledge and technical expertise to the NRO and is well respected both within the organization 

and among our partners and customers," said Keith Hall, NRO Director.
J-S53041- 14

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee

v.
ROBERT BEBOUT,
Appellant No. 689 WDA 2014

Appeal from the PCRA Order April 21 , 2014 in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County Criminal Division at No.: CP

- 02

- CR -0003509-1981

BEFORE: DONOHUE, J., OLSON, J., and PLATT, J. *
JUDGMENT ORDER BY PLATT, J.: FILED SEPTEMBER 30, 2014
Appellant, Robert Bebout, appeals from the denial of his fifth Post
Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) petition. See 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9541

– 9546. A
jury convicted him of second degree murder for his admit ted strangulation
and beating of a seven year-old boy after Appellant, then fifteen, had anally
raped him. ( See N.T. Trial, 4/05/82, at 219). He claims relief und er Miller

v. Alabama , 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012). 1 Commonwealth v. Cunningham ,

____________________________________________

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

1 Miller , supra , held that “mandator y life without parole for those under the age of 18 at the time of their crimes violates the Eig hth Amendment’s prohibition on ‘cruel and unusual punishments.’” Id. at 2460.J-S53041- 14

- 2 -

81 A.3d 1 (Pa. 2013), cert. denied , 134 S. Ct. 2724 (2014), held that Miller
does not apply retroactively in Pennsylvania. We affi rm. The court properly denied relief. 2 Cunningham controls. 3 , 4 And we
have already rejected the argument, asserted here alt ernatively, ( see Appellant’s Brief, at 19 -20), that the habeas corpus statute combined with
various constitutional provisions, permit review. See Commonwealth v.
Seskey , 86 A.3d 237, 244 (Pa. Super. 20 14). Appellant’s claim that the
court should have allowed him to amend his PCRA petiti on to seek habeas

corpus relief, conceded to be outside the scope of the PCRA, ( see Appellant’s Brief, at 17), is unsupported and legally frivolous. The petition is

unt imely, with no applicable exception for a retroactive constitutional right.

See 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9545(b)(1)(iii).

Order affirmed.

____________________________________________

2 “The standard of review for an order denying post -conviction relief is limit ed to whether the record supports the PCRA court’s deter mination, and whether that decision is free of legal error.” Commonwealth v. Johnson , 945 A.2d 185, 188 (Pa. Super. 2008), appeal denied , 956 A.2d 433 (Pa. 2008) (citation omitted).

3 “[N]othing in [a]ppellant]’s arguments persuades us that Miller's proscription of the imposition of mandatory life-witho ut-parole sentences upon offenders under the age of eighteen at the time their crimes were committed must be extended to those whose judgments of sentence were final as of the time of Miller's announcem ent.” Cunningham , supra at 11.

4 The argument that the PCRA court should have stayed proceedings until the Unites States Supreme Court ruled on Cunningham , ( see Appellant’s Brief, at 16), is moot. The Supreme Court denied certiorari on June 9, 2014.J-S53041- 14

- 3 -

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 9/30/2014
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

In Re: Dish Network L.L.C. and 

Echosphere L.L.C.,

 Relators.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00300-CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 

IN MANDAMUS

O R D E R

The Court has this day considered the Relator’s motion for emergency stay and concludes

the motion should be GRANTED. Further proceedings and the Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion 

to Compel Responses to Requests for Production Regarding Disqualification signed on November 

2, 2016, by the Honorable Luis Aguilar are hereby stayed in cause number 2016-DCV-2745, 

styled Yvette Delgado v. Dish Network L.L.C. and Echosphere L.L.C., pending the resolution of 

the petition for writ of mandamus or further order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of November, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE 

PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

20511 

NEWS RELEASE 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ODNI News Release No. 21-07 

October 5, 2007 

Senate Confirms Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence 

Dr. Donald M. Kerr was confirmed on 4 October 2007 by the Senate as Principal Deputy Director 

of National Intelligence, second in command of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence 

after Director Mike McConnell. 

Since July 2005, Kerr served as Director of the National Reconnaissance Office. Prior to that, he 

was the Deputy Director for Science and Technology at the Central Intelligence Agency, which 

awarded him the CIA Distinguished Intelligence Medal two years ago. Earlier in his career, Kerr 

served as Director of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, and as an Assistant Director of the 

Federal Bureau of Investigation. With degrees in electrical engineering, microwave electronics, 

and plasma physics, he also worked as an executive in private industry from 1985 to 1997. 

The PDDNI focuses on coordinating the day-to-day efforts of the 16 agencies that compose the 

Intelligence Community. 

“I am pleased that the Senate has confirmed Dr. Donald Kerr as the Principal Deputy Director of 

National Intelligence,” said DNI McConnell. “The job of Principal Deputy DNI is vital as we work 

to foster integration and collaboration, and further reform American intelligence. Dr. Kerr’s 

experience across our Community – from the intelligence front lines to the front office – will be 

necessary as we work to do just that.” 

President Bush nominated Kerr for the position in July. The previous PDDNI, Gen. Michael V. 

Hayden, was named CIA Director last year. 

# # #
New D-21 Secrets Revealed

Ms. Cynthia Allman

Chief, Information Review and Release Group

(As prepared)

Good evening. I’m Cindy Allman, the Chief of the Information Review and Release Group at 

the National Reconnaissance Office and I’m honored to be here. In conjunction with the 

unveiling of the D-21 Drone today (codenamed “Tagboard”), my office added a collection of 

newly declassified D-21 records to the NRO.gov website. The collection consists of 97 records 

totaling 659 pages. The records span the early development, corrections of system failures and 

issues, and operational records for the planned missions over China.

Highlights of the record collection are:

 A 1967 Manufacturer’s Model Specification of the D-21 that includes information about 

the D-21 drone attaining a speed greater than the Mach 3 which was faster than any other 

drone of the time.

 Another 1967 document entitled, “Operational Limits and Characteristics During Mated 

Flight and Launch,” that details the drone’s range of 3,000 nautical miles, further than 

any other drone of the time.

 A 1969 document titled, “Successful Tagboard Test Flight,” that documents the drone’s 

operational ceiling at 85,000 to 95,000 feet.

 A 1970 summary of Tagboard B-52 launches documenting air launches from a B-52 

Stratofortress.

 A 1970 note to Dr. McLucas entitled “Tagboard Navigation March 1970,” documenting

the improved navigation system.

 A memorandum for the Secretary of Defense on the subject of “Tagboard Operational 

Missions from September 1969,” that recommended four operational flights over 

southern China.

The D-21 technology developed in the 1962-1971 timeframe and the borrowed technology from 

the U2, A12, and SR71 reconnaissance aircrafts created a drone that the world had never seen. 

These advances in drone technology laid the ground work for the drone of the future. Please take 

a walk back into history by visiting the D-21 record collection on NRO.gov. 

Thank you for the opportunity to be part of this event.