alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Robinson, Respondent, vs. Berry, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Goggins, Brazeau & Graves*of Wisconsin Rapids.

For the respondent: *Fisher, Cashin & Reinholdt*of Stevens Point.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
Order filed October 5 , 2021.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 21

- 00531

- CV

IN RE STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS County Court at Law # 4 and P robate Court

Brazoria County, Texas Tri al Court Cause No. CI60388



### O RDER

On September 21, 2021 , relator S tate Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company filed a petition for writ of m andamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, rela tor asks this Court to compel the Honorable Lori Rickert, presiding judge of the County Court at Law # 4 and Probate Court of Brazoria County , to vacate its August 17, 2021, order denying relator ’ s motion for separate trials and abatement and direct the tr ial court
to abate plaintiff ’ s extra

- contr actual claims against relator until after plaintiff obtains a judicial determina tion that he is entitled to recover from an underinsured motorist

.2

R elator also has filed a motion for temporary relief

. See Tex. R. App. P

. 52.8(b), 52.10. R elator ask ed this court to stay proceedings in the trial court pending a decision on the petition for writ of mandamus. It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relator’s request for relief requires furth er c onsideration and that relator will be prejudiced unless immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relator’s motion and issue th e following order:

We ORDER the proceedings in trial court cause number CI60388 , Lance Bellis v. Victor Pedr aza, Jr., and Sta te Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company , including the trial scheduled for December 13 , 2021, STAYED until a final decision by this court on relator’s pe tition for writ of mandamus, or until further order of this court.
We further ORDER re lator , within fourteen days , to submit “a properly authenticated transcript of any relevant testimony from any underlying proceeding, including exhibits offered in eviden ce, or a statement that no testimony was adduced in connection with the matter comp lai ned

. ” See Tex. R. App. P. 52. 7(a)(2). In addition, the court requests Lance Bellis , the real party

- in

- interest, to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before November 5, 2021. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.4.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Wise, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
##### 



Exhibit 13.1 Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of SK Telecom Co., Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 20-F/A for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (this Amendment), Shin Bae Kim, as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Sung Min Ha, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to the best of his knowledge: (1) This Amendment fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in this Amendment fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.     /s/ Shin Bae Kim Name:
    
    Shin Bae KimTitle:
    
    Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    July 25, 2005
     /s/ Sung Min Ha Name:
    
    Sung Min HaTitle:
    
    Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    July 25, 2005
     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies this Amendment pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by
the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS



I, Kenneth W. Brimmer, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of STEN Corporation;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date  May 15, 2007 | /s/ Kenneth W. Brimmer 
|------------------ | -----------------------
|                   | Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 30 (Friday, February 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03068]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9019-5]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 02/02/2015 Through 02/06/2015
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20150028, Final EIS, USFS, ID, Clear Creek Integrated 
Restoration Project, Review Period Ends: 03/16/2015, Contact: Lois Hill 
208-935-4257.
EIS No. 20150029, Final EIS, USFS, 00, Greater Sage Grouse Bi-State 
Distinct Population Segment Forest Plan Amendment, Review Period Ends: 
04/07/2015, Contact: James Winfrey 775-355-5308.
EIS No. 20150030, Draft EIS, USN, WA, Land-Water Interface and Service 
Pier Extension at Naval Base Kitsap Bangor, Comment Period Ends: 04/13/
2015, Contact: Thomas Dildine 360-396-0018.
EIS No. 20150031, Draft EIS, BLM, NV, Gold Rock Mine Project, Comment 
Period Ends: 03/30/2015, Contact: Dan Netcher 775-289-1872.
EIS No. 20150032, Draft EIS, BOP, KY, U.S. Penitentiary and Federal 
Prison Camp, Letcher County, Comment Period Ends: 03/30/2015, Contact: 
Issac Gaston 202-514-6470.
EIS No. 20150033, Draft EIS, USFS, ID, Salmon-Challis National Forest 
Invasive Plant Treatment, Comment Period Ends: 03/30/2015, Contact: 
Jennifer Purvine 208-879-4162.
EIS No. 20150034, Draft EIS, USACE, OR, Double-crested Cormorant 
Management Plan to Reduce Predation of Juvenile Salmonids in the 
Columbia River Estuary, Comment Period Ends: 03/16/2015, Contact: 
Robert Winters 503-808-4738.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20140372, Draft EIS, DOE, 00, Plains and Eastern Clean Line 
Transmission Project, Comment Period Ends: 04/20/2015, Contact: Jane 
Summerson, 505-845- 4091, Revision to FR Notice Published 12/29/2014; 
Extending Comment Period from 03/19/2015 to 04/20/2015

    Dated: February 10, 2015.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2015-03068 Filed 2-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
• ". .

. • •• • • .

.

•• ••••••1:•14

THE WHITE HOUSE

KEYHOLE SYSTEM ONLY •

In

Washington • . • .•

,

. •

August 26, 1960

MEMORANDUM FOR

The Secretary of State

The Secretary of Defense*

The Attorney General**

The Chairman, Atomic Energy Commission

The Director of Central Intelligence

I hereby direct that the products of satellite reconnaissance, and information of the fact of such reconnaissance revealed by the product,

*shall be given strict security handling under the provisions of a

special security control system approved by me. I hereby approve

the TALENT-KEYHOLE Security Control System for this purpose.

Within your agency. you shall be personally responsible for the selection of those personnel who will have access to the foregoing information

and for determining the scope of that access. Access is to be on a

"must know" basis related to major national security needs. A list of

those selected shall be furnished to the Director of Central Intelligence.

who will maintain and review the control roster. When they are indoctrinated. they shall be informed of my specific direction to them

that the provisions of the special Security Control System I have

approved be strictly complied with. including the prohibition upon them

of imparting any information within this system to any person not specifically known to them to be on the list of those authorized to receive

this material. The responsibility for the selection of personne: may

be delegated only to the senior intelligence chief or chiefs within the

agencies serving as members of the U. S. Intelligence Board.

The Director of Central Intelligence, in consultation with the U. S.

Intelligence Board. will be responsible to me for determining all questions involved in the continued protection and control of the foregoing

material and information, including the development of a common

understanding as to the meaning of the term " 'must know' basis re-

.

lined to major national security needs," and a broad consensus as to

the numbers of personnel in each agency comprehended by this term.

*For Department of Defense

including 0511. JCS. Army.

Navy, Air Force, and NSA

*For Director. FBI

•

. •

signed Dwight D. Eisenhower

HANDLE VIA TALENTKEYHOLE SYSTEM ONLY

Ty 3V02.

JeAfe.5 A' •
C03400159 

NRO APP OVE OR RELEASE simi 

1 AUGUS 

TOP SECRET 

CHESS/RUFF 

CORONA/ GAMBIT 

IDEALIST / TACKLE 

HANDLE VIA BYEMAN- TALENT/KEYHOLECOMINT CONTROL SYSTEMS JOINTLY 

C2 

Copy No. of 78 

BYE-4528-66/1 

27 May 1966 

Limited Distribution 

UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE BOARD 

MEMORANDUM FOR HOLDERS OF USIB-D-41.19/29 

SUBJECT Status of Overhead Photographic and SIGINT Reconnaissance 

REFERENCE : USIB-D-41.19/29 (COMOR-D-72/29) 

24 May 1966, Limited Distribution 

Please substitute the attached revised maps in all copies of the 

reference document. The map on Cloud-Free High-Resolution Photographic 

Coverage of Communist China should be substituted following page 13 and 6'61 

the Priority Comor Targets in South China and North Vietnam should be 

substituted facing page 16. •% 

USIB Secretariat 

Attachments 

HANDLE VIA BYEMAN-TALENT/KEYHOLECOMINT CONTROL SYSTEMS JOINTLY 

IDEALIST / TACKLE 

CORONA / GAMBIT 

CHESS/RUFF 

TOP SECRET 

GROUP 1 

Excluded from automatic 

downgrading and 

declassification 
b. 

365 orbits in support of EOB reauirements. 

were tasked for 

of data for use by the NSA in developing the 

for locating radars. 

were tasked on 

135 orbits of 

collection 

and four 

C03400159 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 AUGUS-11-12friale via. BYEMAN:'"I'd 

TALENT -KEYHOLE, 

COMINT Control 

TOP SECRET 

CHESS/RUFF 

CORONA/GAMBIT 

IDEALIST /TACKLE 

*achment 

USIB-D-41.19/29 

(COMOR-D-72/29) 

24 May 1966 

Limited Distribution 

SIGINT cont. 

398 orbits, also collected against Directed 

Coverage requirements on 130 orbits. 

6. Report Highlights: 

(POPPY).: The NSA reported 21 TALL KING 

locations which were derived from 

data from (POPPY). The 

accuracy of these locations, resulting from the 

technique. vary from miles (semi-major axis) and 

average miles. 

7225 (SQUARE TWENTY): 

( 1) The NSA has reported the successful 

detection and location of pulse-position-modulated (PPM) 

microwave facilities in the Communist bloc by SIGINT satellite 

7225 (SQUARE TWENTY-). 

28 BYE-4528-66 

IDEALIST / TACKLE 

CORONA/GAMBIT 

CHESS/RUFF 

Handle via BYEMAN, 

TALENT-KEYHOLE, 

COMINT Control
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

05/29

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 29 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
FIRST
      M
& F CORPORATION





**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATIONS**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of First M&F Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      John G. Copeland, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best
      of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:





A.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





B.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Date:  November
      8, 2007




/s/
                John G. CopelandJohn
                G. CopelandEVP
                & Chief Financial Officer
# How to Appeal

FOIA
Privacy Act
current page

A requester has the right to file an administrative appeal if an adverse determination is made. Examples of adverse determinations are denial of records, the inability of an agency to locate records, or lack of timely response, etc.

#### Submitting a PA Appeal

          - By Email:  FOIA@nro.mil
          - By postal service or other commercial delivery:  National Reconnaissance Office  Attn: COMM/Information Review and Release Group  14675 Lee Road  Chantilly, VA 20151-1715
          - By fax:  703-745-0833
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certificate of Principal Financial Officer

pursuant to section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section
906

of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of CNET Networks, Inc. (CNET Networks) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the
Report), I, Douglas N. Woodrum, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CNET Networks, certify pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CNET Networks.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 15, 2005



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ Douglas N. Woodrum      
|Douglas N. Woodrum          
|Executive Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer     



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CNET Networks and will be retained by CNET Networks and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
GREG ZOELLER 

INDIANA ATIORNEY GENERAL 

Ms. Susan Hedman 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA, Region 5 

STATE OF INDIANA 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

INDIANA GOVERNMENT CENTER SOUTH, FIFfH FLOOR 

302 W. WASHINGTON STREET • INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-2770 

W'ww.AttorneyGeneral.IN. gov 

November 10,2014 

77 West Jackson Boulevard 

Chicago, Illinois 60604 

TELEPHONE: 31 7.232.6201 

FAX: 31 7.232.7979 

Re: AG Opinion of Incorporation by Reference of Indiana's other solid waste incineration 

regulation (326 lAC 11-9, LSA Document #06-437) 

Dear Ms. Hedman: 

Pursuant to my delegation of authority from the Attorney General for the State of 

Indiana, I give this opinion . It is my opinion that: (1) the Indiana Department of Environmental 

Management, Office of Air Quality (IDEM), has the ability to regulate emissions from other solid 

waste incineration units; (2) that the Air Pollution Control Board( replaced effective January 1, 

2013, by the Environmental Rules Board under IC 13-13-8) may do so by means of an 

incorporation by reference of federal emission guideline provisions; and (3) that 326 lAC 11-9, 

regulating such facilities, is within the authority of IDEM and is enforceable. 

In other words, 326 lAC 11-9 adopted by the Air Pollution Control Board (APCB) on 

February 7, 2007 and was effective on August 9, 2007, regulates other solid waste incineration 

units by means of an incorporation by reference in 326 lAC 11-9-3 of federal emission guideline 

provisions at 40 CFR 60, Subpart FFFF. Indiana law specifically provides: 

(a) If incorporation of the text in full would be cumbersome, expensive, or 

otherwise inexpedient, an agency may incorporate by reference into a rule part or all of 

any of the following matters: 

(1) A federal or state statute, rule, or regulation. 

(2) A code, manual, or other standard adopted by an agent of the United States, 

a state, or a nationally recognized organization or association. 

(3) A manual of the department of local government finance adopted in a rule 

described in IC 6-1.1-31-9. 

(b) Each matter incorporated by reference under subsection (a) must be fully .and 

exactly described. 

IC 4-22-2-21 (a) and IC 4-22-2-21 (b). Thus, this section allows the Air Pollution_ Control Board, 

and in the future, the Environmental Rules Board, to incorporate federal guidelines by reference. 

The incorporation by reference is valid and enforceable. 
Sin ># 

Matt Light 

Chief Deputy Attorney General 

(for) Attorney General Greg Zoeller 

cc: Ann Long, IDEM, Office of Legal Counsel
#### M. Z. FOLGER *v.*WILLIAM BOWLES.

A vendor, who lias sold land and given a bond to make title when the price is paid, and who has paid a part of such price, has no interest in the land which can be sold under an execution.

*{Tally*v. *JReid,*at this Term, cited and approved.)

Civil aotiok in the nature of ejectment, tried before *Cannon, J.,*at Pall Term, 1873, Surry Superior Court.

*604The plaintiff claimed title to the land in controversy, under a deed made in pursuance of an execution, under a judgment of a Justice of the Peace, against one Elizabeth Butcher. There was no controversy as to the regularity of the proceedings under which the deed was executed. The defendant admitted himself in possession of the land in controversy,, and claimed title thereto under the same Elizabeth Butcher. It was admitted that Elizabeth Butcher had only a life estate in the land. The defendant showed a deed from Elizabeth Butcher, conveying two-thirds of said land to him, dated 8th of May, 1858, and also a bond for title to said land, dated 25th of February, 1856. A part of the purchase money had been paid.

The plaintiff asked his Honor to instruct the jury that notwithstanding the title bond of Elizabeth Butcher, was outstanding, at the day of the levy, still the plaintiff', by the said levy and the proceedings thereon acquired the legal title, and the legal title alone being in question, the plaintiff would be entitled to recover the legal title subject to the equity of the defendant.

The defendant insisted that Elizabeth Butcher had no interest in the land described in the complaint, which was subject to sale under execution, and therefore the plaintiff was not entitled to recover. The Court being of opinion with the defendant so instructed the jury.

The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the defendant, whereupon the plaintiff moved for a new trial. Motion for a new trial was overruled and thereupon the plaintiff appealed upon the following ground:

The Court erred in instructing the jury that a defendant in execution, who had contracted to sell his land, and given bond for title, and had received a part, but not all, of the purchase money, had no such interest inland as was subject to sale under execution.

— Hasten. for appellant.

*MoCorhle <& Bailey,*contra.

*605Rea.de, J.

The question involved in this case is the same as in *Tally*v. *Reid,*at this term, where it is fully considered; and the principles there laid down govern this. A vendor who has sold land, given a bond for title when the price is paid, a part of which has been paid, has no interest in the land which can be sold under execution.

There is no error.

Pee Cueiam. Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AutoInfo, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harry Wachtel, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Harry Wachtel
-------------------------------
Harry Wachtel
Chief Executive Officer
April 30, 2003


                                       16