alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOHN CHAPMAN , Appellant,

v.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BANK OF AMERCA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO L A SALLE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE PASS

- THROUGH CERTIFICATES WMALT SERIES 2006

- AR9 , Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3179

[ May 24, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County ; William L. Roby , Ju dge; L.T. Case No. 43

- 2009

- CA

000110

.
John Chapman, Palm City, pro se.

Karin L. Posser and William L. Grimsley of McGlinchey Stafford, Jacksonville, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

G ERBER , C.J., G R OSS and C IKLIN , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 29 (Thursday, February 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7860-7861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02938]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ID-7590-000]


Atwood, Donald G.; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on February 5, 2015, Donald G. Atwood submitted 
for filing, an application for authority to hold interlocking 
positions, pursuant to section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 
16 U.S.C. 825(b) and Part 45 of the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission's (Commission) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR part 
45.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214).

[[Page 7861]]

Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. 
Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the 
comment date. On or before the comment date, it is not necessary to 
serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the 
Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
``eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables subscribers to 
receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed 
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#53151601101c3d3f3a3d36002623233c212713353621307d343c25"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fcbab9aebfb39290959299af898c8c938e88bc9a998e9fd29b938a">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 26, 2015.

    Dated: February 6, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-02938 Filed 2-11-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Optimal Robotics Corp. (the "Company"),
does hereby certify that to the best of the undersigned's knowledge:

      1)    the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
            31, 2003 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
            Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Dated: March 5, 2004                              /s/ Gary S. Wechsler
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                       Gary S. Wechsler
                                                       Treasurer and
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
NRCS CONSERVATION PRACTICE EFFECTS - NETWORK DIAGRAM November 2022

Riparian Herbaceous Cover (390) *

Initial setting: Areas adjacent to water courses or 

bodies where the natural plant community is 

dominated by herbaceous vegetation and where 

establishment or maintenance of cover is needed 

to improve water quality, fishery and wildlife habitat, 

and/or stabilize the bank or shoreline

2. Plant root systems 

C.5 (+) 

Recreational 

opportunities

D.4 (-) 

Streambank or 

shoreline erosion 

and associated 

sedimentation 

C.1 (+) Quality of 

receiving waters

I.10 (+) 

Entrapment and 

uptake of 

nitrates in soil 

D.6 (-) Land available 

for commercial crop 

production and 

development

C.8 (-) Energy 

inputs

C.4 (+) Health of 

community, humans and 

animals C.6 (+/-) Income and 

income stability 

(individuals and 

community)

I.8 (+) Trapping of 

sediment and 

sediment attached 

pollutants

I.11 (+) Uptake 

of soil nutrients 

D.3 (+) Infiltration 

of precipitation 

and soil storage 

C.7 (+) Air quality 

of air shed

I.15 (-) 

Greenhouse 

gases 

I.17 (-) Crop 

production, 

potential 

income

D.1 (+) 

Herbaceous 

wildlife 

habitat

I.1 (-) Habitat 

fragmentation

I.3 (+) Leaf 

debris fall

I.4 (+) 

Detritus in 

streams 

I.16 (-) Urban 

lawn 

maintenance

1. Vertical vegetative 

structure and canopy cover 

of herbaceous plants

D.7 (+) Cost of 

establishment and 

maintenance

I.12 (-) Compaction

D.2 (+) 

Herbaceous 

plant biomass

I.5 (+) 

Shade

I.18 (+/-) Net 

returns 

 C.2 (+) Soil quality

I.7 (+) 

Aquatic 

habitat

I.6 (-) Water 

temperatures

I.14 (-) 

Pesticide 

residues

D.5 (+) Root 

biomass

C.3 (+) Biodiversity

I.9 (-) Soil 

erosion

I.13 (+) Soil 

organic matter 

and carbon 

storage

I.2 (-) 

Invasive/ 

noxious 

species

Start

Note: 

Effects are qualified with a plus (+) 

or minus (-). These symbols indicate 

only an increase (+) or a decrease 

(-) in the effect upon the resource, 

not whether the effect is beneficial 

or adverse.

*Effects start at establishment and 

continue through to fully functional 

condition.

LEGEND

#. Created by practice

D. Direct effect

I. Indirect effect

C. Cumulative effect

Pathway

Mitigating practice

Associated practice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollar
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1998 
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998 
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1 
<CASH>                                               7,021 
<SECURITIES>                                             0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                       86,961 
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0 
<INVENTORY>                                              0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   119,697 
<PP&E>                                             124,298 
<DEPRECIATION>                                      71,286 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,046,177 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              331,468 
<BONDS>                                            615,223 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                         3,968,715 
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,869,229 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,046,177 
<SALES>                                            915,736 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   915,736 
<CGS>                                              942,845 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      942,845 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    19,269 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6,391 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (52,769)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (52,769)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0 
<CHANGES>                                                0 
<NET-INCOME>                                       (52,769)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.004)
                                               

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ Al A. GonsoulinAl A. GonsoulinChairman and Chief Executive Officer
#### Sapa (Charles), Respondent, vs. Kern, Appellant.

For the appellant: *D. J. Regan*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Sydney C. Charney*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 25, 2015

NO. 03-14-00309-CR

Wesley Eugene Perkins, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment of guilty rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed the 

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial 

court’s judgment of guilty. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of guilty. 

Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
rn Caner oe Bog? 1%?
re Coin eit : po

.
.

< *, . 7 awe . te - — oe . he . ; a Mme ticotene =
” ; .. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE. Lt
: . WASHINGTON :
Office of the Secretary

.

re 41 September 1961.

MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE - ~"
ATTENTION: -Brig Gen George 8, ‘Brown

B22

b : Military Assistant .
| _ Info cys to: OSD Dep SAFRD . SAFMS(3)_

S OSD Spec Asst? SAFFM . AFCCS
ff: - 3 + ° QDDRSE (Dr. -Brown):: SEFMA AFCVC |
ce SAFSi° . - SAFLE . AFCIN
vl . BAFUS : SAFOI. AFCVS-DSMG
ood. _ AFSDC-IN-
i i SUBJECT: ©. SAMOS Launch Report owt

po 1. (U) SAMOS rit (Atias 106D/Agena 2120) exploded on pad
tO number 1 at the PMR, Point:arguello Complex at approximately
, ., 1529 EDT, 9 Sep 61. :

>

.¢ 2. (s) Preliminary information indicates’a malfunction in :
‘|. boosterselectrical system caused‘inadvertent engine shutdown approx-
. imately one second-after lift-off. Missilé:settled back.on pad after -
.. lifting approximately 2-3 feet and exploded. ‘Initial pad damage report - _
- , indicates all plumbing and wiring-above:ground.destroyed; umbilical :,

! - mast still. Standing, but structural integrity in doubt; launcher damaged,
! “ will probably ‘Sequire réplacemént;“équipment Eons below pad ajpear:-
t : to be relatively undamaged; gantry appears undamaged, although gantry
ig. ... crane is damaged slightly; Atlas booster and Agena second stage were
4 completely destroyed. Pad #2 of the launch complex was undamaged. ©
: . Investigation to determine exact cause of failure is continuing.

OP AUTOM ie bas,

“+ DOD DIR. 5200.10 © .
ee Ts rr ler General,

Director, Office of Missile 7 oo

& Satellite Sy
§ ich Taz gat 2 . -

an: ORR ay no ; - :
GU sae 4 WAL:

i

]

| ot

|: - OWNGRADED AT 12 YEAR INTERVALS;
; DECLASSIFIED
i

# a
99-950.

#### State v. Thompson.

Lorain App. No. 98CA007001. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
#### STATE v. STEPHEN ROYAL.

*Verdict, impeachment of.*

The verdict of a jury cannot be impeached by one of its members.

*{Slate*v. *McLeod,*1 Hawks, 344; *State*v. *Smallwood,*78 N. C., 560; *State*v. *Brittain,*89 if. C., 4S1, cited and approved).

INDICTMENT for an assault tried at Fall Term, 1S83, of CUMBERLAND Superior Court, before *McKoy, J.*

The defendant was charged with an assault with a deadly weapon upon one Benjamin Walker, and was found guilty by tlie jury. He then moved for a new trial upon an affidavit of ■one of the jurors who tried the case, to the effect that “the jury ■came to the conclusion of the defendant’s guilt because he failed to have present and examine his son, who it was in evidence was •present at the time of the alleged assault.” But His Honor refused to hear the affidavit, and pronounced judgment, fronl which the defendant appealed.

*Attorney-General,*for the State.

*Mr. W. A. Guthrie,*for defendant.

Ashe, J.

There is no principle of law better settled in this ■state than that evidence impeaching their verdict must not come from the jury, but must be shown by other testimony. *State*v. *McLeod,*1 Hawks, 344; *State*v. *Smallwood,*78 N. C., 560; *State*v. *Brittain,*89 N. C., 481.

It is therefore ordered that the motion for a new trial be ■overruled, and that the superior court of Cumberland county proceed to judgment against the defendant agreeably to this •opinion according to law.

No Error.

Affirmed.
ID 

Union Calendar No. 199 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 136 

[Report No. 114–263] 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2015 

Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2015 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 136 RH

A BILL 

To amend chapter 21 of title 5, United States Code, to 

provide that fathers of certain permanently disabled or 

deceased veterans shall be included with mothers of such 

veterans as preference eligibles for treatment in the civil 

service. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 136 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gold Star Fathers Act 

5 of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PREFERENCE ELIGIBLE TREATMENT FOR FATHERS 

7 OF CERTAIN PERMANENTLY DISABLED OR 

8 DECEASED VETERANS. 

9 Section 2108(3) of title 5, United States Code, is 

10 amended by striking subparagraphs (F) and (G) and in11 serting the following: 

12 ‘‘(F) the parent of an individual who lost 

13 his or her life under honorable conditions while 

14 serving in the armed forces during a period 

15 named by paragraph (1)(A) of this section, if— 

16 ‘‘(i) the spouse of that parent is to17 tally and permanently disabled; or 

18 ‘‘(ii) that parent, when preference is 

19 claimed, is unmarried or, if married, le20 gally separated from his or her spouse; 

21 ‘‘(G) the parent of a service-connected per22 manently and totally disabled veteran, if— 

23 ‘‘(i) the spouse of that parent is to24 tally and permanently disabled; or 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

•S 136 RH

1 ‘‘(ii) that parent, when preference is 

2 claimed, is unmarried or, if married, le3 gally separated from his or her spouse; 

4 and’’. 

5 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

6 The amendment made by this Act shall take effect 

7 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 199 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 136 

[Report No. 114–263] 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 21 of title 5, United States 

erence eligibles for treatment in the civil service. cluded with mothers of such veterans as prefnently disabled or deceased veterans shall be inCode, to provide that fathers of certain permaSEPTEMBER 18, 2015 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
-fre---tetki7F, t„,..ztaiLL.k 6f 6 3(C33 - 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 201.d.' 

)11k. ..i Furiciloite: ,IVECIL 

- . ■., 

immingspouto 

/-4- 

.

"3 

55-

4.60,...,------- 

June • 2 .196 

it 1 

-S 55 

- - 

Dear Red, 

As you kracw, in 1903 the .Sccrotary of Defence direted 

the Mx For ea tOtindtrazta,,e.4 a study a a possible weaned orbital... 

lzioratory MO and of unitary and of er,perizuenta that 

mi.eo.. be coodut.ted in such a laboratory. Durins calendar 1964 

a wide variety of 'experiz,ents were examined, many of then by 

contractors. Soma Air Force funds were reproaremend 

to the .V.O, eau! cmparative sta:des of traaned And Unmanned 

syster..‘s for hi& resolution optical reconnaisianceluere con* 

(17.2tted under the aezis of the W.O. The code rome in 

the. DYEZ.'..1.11 systole, was established for these latter 'activities. 

Late in 191i4, drawinz on the results of these studies, 

the Secretary of Defense chaugod the priority of objectiVcs for 

the pLetnning of the HOL, placing e.nebasis on the development of 

techoolos-y contributing to improved military-observational 

capability for manned or umanned opdrationsand encouraging 

consideration of interrsediste steps toward operational systems. 

The Secretary re:vested that a program be plazuled.mod submitted 

for US consideration &mina may. s1' 

For the past five mouths work has use fermerd toward 

these sore specific objectives, under the personal,direction 

,of the Under Secretary of the ir Force. gvisa studies have 

been continuod by the IMO under rtift.1.11i classification, using, 

fun,do reprocratued from the Air .For& o. 

t123 infOravd that frout.this Worti, A fairly specific 

pro:;ram hes [20V evolved for the development of a capal:!ility for 

very high resolution optical reconnaissanc4.1. Vatails of this 

prop,osad 1Arcisrama have been briefed to Harold Drown, and at his 

..:70cro=ene'etion, • to. to Romig an the Pa,nel arca Reconnaissance -

of the President's Science Advisory Conts.ittes.' . formal 

ress3ntation. to the Zeeretary of Defense, is under pr.aparation. 

. - 

Even in advance of formal submission Of this program, I 

would like to bc sure that you have had a chance to see the 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2014 

rb. 

Rime; of pro ,ram that has evolved, and be informed about the 

capabilities that it. promises. I would like to be better 

11;1-ozocd myzelf, aud 1 have asked Drock NeRillan to try to 

arrange an hour's briefing for both of us. trust that it 

will DC possible to hear, this soon. • 

Cyrus.R.1/ancts, 

Vico AZIairal :41,11.1.ars $. nabora,; USN (Rut

. 

Central Intelligence Agent:
#### Humble, Appellant, vs. Industrial Commission and others, Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane county dated June 15, 1927: August C. Hoppmann, Judge.

Workmen’s compensation. Judgment affirming order of *Industrial Commission*dismissing complaint, from which claimant appeals.

For the appellant: *Alexander, Burke & Clarke*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent *Industrial Commission: lohn W. Reynolds,*attorney general, and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed, without costs, appellant to pay the clerk’s fees.
Exhibit 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of Headwaters Incorporated
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the
"Report"), we, Kirk A. Benson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Steven G. Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (i)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (ii)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Kirk A. Benson
--------------------------
Kirk A. Benson
Chief Executive Officer
May 9, 2005

/s/ Steven G. Stewart
--------------------------
Steven G. Stewart
Chief Financial Officer
May 9, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 8.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

The following is a list of the Registrant's subsidiaries as of December 31,
2002, other than certain subsidiaries that did not in the aggregate constitute a
significant subsidiary.

Name                                               Jurisdiction of Incorporation

QIAGEN AS                                          Norway
QIAGEN GmbH                                        Germany
QIAGEN, Inc.                                       California
QIAGEN K.K.                                        Japan
QIAGEN Ltd.                                        England
QIAGEN Instruments AG                              Switzerland
QIAGEN Operon, Inc.                                California
QIAGEN Sciences, Inc.                              Maryland
QIAGEN Sciences, K.K.                              Japan
## Addendum: An Assessment of

Environmental Problems Associated with Recycling of

Hazardous Secondary Materials Appendix 3: Analysis of Recycling Damage Cases that

Are Also Intermediate FacilitiesJune 2011

- 1 - Analysis of Recycling Damage Cases that Are Also Intermediate Facilities

Site Name BR Indicates Intermediate Facility Damage Case Study Text

Indicating Intermediate Facility Romic Environmental Technologies, AZ Yes Romic Environmental Technologies, CA Yes
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**








In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Consortium Service Management Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report), I, K. Bruce Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




****Date: April __, 2005
By:
/s/ *K. Bruce Jones*K. Bruce JonesChief Financial Officer





The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.


Exhibit 32.1Page 1 of 1 Page