alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2005143EN.01003501.xml

| 11.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/35

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 14 February 2005

in Case T-406/03 Nicolas Ravailhe v Committee of the Regions of the European Union (1)

1

(Officials - Prior administrative procedure - Inadmissibility)

(2005/C 143/66)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-406/03: Nicolas Ravailhe, a former member of the temporary staff of the Committee of the Regions of the European Union, residing in Amiens (France), represented by J.-P. Brodsky, against Committee of the Regions of the European Union (Agent: P. Cervilla, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer) — application, primarily, against the refusal of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment to reinstate the applicant in his post and restore his rights under the Staff Regulations as a member of the temporary staff of the Committee of the Regions of the European Union or, in the alternative, for payment of compensation — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of M. Vilaras, President, F. Dehousse and D. Šváby, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 14 February 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The application is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The parties shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The parties shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 47 of 21.2.2004.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                              PLAINS RESOURCES INC.
                            2001 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

     Plains Resources Inc. (the "Company"), having previously adopted the Plains
Resources Inc. 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), and in accord with the
powers granted to the board of directors of the Company (the "Board") pursuant
to Section 15 of the Plan, does hereby amend the Plan, effective as of September
10, 2002, as follows:

     Section 6.4(a) of the Plan is hereby amended and replaced in its entirety
by the following:

     "(a) Except as otherwise provided by the Board, if an Optionee's service as
     a Director terminates for any reason other than Disability, death or Cause,
     the Optionee may for a period of three (3) months after such termination
     exercise his or her Option to the extent, and only to the extent, that such
     Option or portion thereof was vested and exercisable as of the date the
     Optionee's service as a Director terminated, after which time the Option
     shall automatically terminate in full."

     This amended Section 6.4(a) shall apply to Options outstanding on the date
hereof and to Options granted in the future pursuant to the terms of the Plan
(as amended). Agreements with respect to Options outstanding on the date hereof
shall be amended as necessary to provide for this amendment.

     The first paragraph of Section 6.4 of the Plan is hereby amended and
replaced in its entirety by the following:

     "Duration. Subject to Section 7.4, each Formula Option shall terminate on
     the date which is the tenth anniversary of the date of grant (or if later,
     the first anniversary of the date of the Director's death if such death
     occurs prior to such tenth anniversary), unless terminated earlier as
     follows:"

     This amended first paragraph of Section 6.4 shall apply to Options granted
in the future pursuant to the terms of the Plan (as amended).

     Adopted by the Board on September 10, 2002.

                                       1
TOP SECRET

—(S}-NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

THE P:110 STAFF

24 October 1974

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. PLUMMER

SUBJECT: Program C Membership on the NRO R&D Advisory

Council

RADM Geiger has requested that the Director, Program C,

be granted membership on the NRO R&D Advisory Council (TAB. A).

In response to RADM Geiger's arguments for representation, the main reasons that the Director, Program C, was not

invited to participate on the recently established R&D

Advisory Council are as follows:

a. The R&D Council provides broad guidance on

NRP related R&D. It does not allocate specific resources.

.b. The NRP R&D capability and efforts have

centered in Program A and Program B. Program A covers

Program C interests in Ocean Surveillance, Tactical ELINT,

etc:

c. The' NRO Staff and advisors maintain cognizance

of planned and on-going Navy "White" effort of interest.

However, in retrospect, it appears that Director,

Program C, might be able to contribute some additional

information on Navy efforts which would be of benefit to

Advisory Council deliberations and ensure adequate exchange

of NRP-Navy information to prevent unnecessary duplication.

Such participation would not mean an'automatic cut of the

NRP R&D pie. Program C would haveto justify any proposed

NRP efforts which would be judged by the NRO Staff on its

own merits.

•

R

M

C GORY 1M DECLASSIFY ON,NIP MT.

RCUT ONOR R12 PR ,VglIT TOP SECRET

MTIIRM CONTROL NO INTERNAL

copy 1 or _icorocs

PAGE_I_OF 2 PALLS

•••••... • IMP. ••• • •••••,10.....•••n11• ••••1111.1•10n••n•
Hence, I recommend you concur in RADM Geiger's request

with certain caveats by signing the memorandum at the right. .

Colonel, USAF

Director

Attach

TA 5293-74

•

8.4=1

li 1110Wirib

rwr

 un

CONTROL NO INTERNAL

COPT COPIES

ID Aar--Y-OF ----jrPAGES
TOP SECRET

(S) NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON, D.C.

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR

MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, PROGRAM C

SUBJECT: NRO Research & Development Advisory Council

I have reviewed your request for membership on the NRO

R&D Advisory Council.

As you noted, the Navy is active in some R&D areas of

interest to the NRP. I am aware of Navy participation in the

Support R&D Program through the annual R&D Review and recognize that your office has been the point of contact for Navy

"White" R&D efforts.

The NRO R&D Council is chartered to provide broad guidance to the NRP and as such could benefit from information on

Navy efforts of related or common NRP interest. As such, I

believe your participation on the Council would be of mutual

benefit and thereby concur in your participation. As a

matter of policy the Council does not allocate near-term

resources or approve specific R&D efforts. Specific R&D

efforts are reviewed on a yearly basis by the NRO Staff and

are submitted to me for approval.

J. W. Plummer

•

F14111111110MPTRWAI

SAL OICL $IDIEDIAS 

C ORDEN IEEE! EXEMPTION CATE TOP SECRET

1112 DECLASSIFY ON WV DM

CONTROL NO

COPY OF COPIES

PAGE I OF 1 PAGES
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial  statements  as of and for the six months ended June 30, 1998 included
herein  and  is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to  such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         2,872
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         480,453
<DEPRECIATION>                                 73,887
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 432,254
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        256,834
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     157,384
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   432,254
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               47,156
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  14,049
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               10,679 <F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             10,225
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                9,858
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            9,858
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (460)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   9,398
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .76
        

<FN>
<F1> 
Depreciation and amortization
</FN>


</TABLE>
Submitted on record and briefs June 2,

affirmed July 14,

reconsideration denied September 29,

petition for review denied November 30, 1993 (318 Or 98)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*DAVID NICHOLS OWEN, *Appellant.*

(91-1390; CA A75137)

855 P2d 1141

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, and Amanda Buttress, Certified Law Student, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*666PER CURIAM

Defendant was charged with six offenses. He pled guilty to five of them, and the state dismissed the sixth charge pursuant to a plea agreement that included certain sentencing recommendations. On appeal, defendant challenges the post-prison supervision period imposed. Although the state concedes that the court erred in the manner claimed by defendant, we are foreclosed from reviewing the claimed error. ORS 138.222(2)(d). *State v. Adams,*315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993); *State v. Kilborn,*120 Or App 462, 852 P2d 935 (1993); *State v. Johnston,*120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1156 (1993).

Affirmed.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 580/2006

of 7 April 2006         

amending the representative prices and additional duties for the import of certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1011/2005 for the 2005/2006 marketing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1423/95 of 23 June 1995 laying down detailed implementing rules for the import of products in the sugar sector other than molasses (2), and in particular the second sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 1(2), and Article 3(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The representative prices and additional duties on imports of the products referred to in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1423/95, as fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1011/2005 for the 2005/2006 marketing year are hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 8 April 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 April 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 141, 24.6.1995, p. 16. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 624/98 (OJ L 85, 20.3.1998, p. 5).

(3)OJ L 170, 1.7.2005, p. 35.

(4)OJ L 98, 6.4.2006, p. 71.

----

ANNEX

Amended representative prices and additional duties applicable to imports of white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 1702 90 99  applicable from 8 April 2006

----

(1)  Fixed for the standard quality defined in Annex I.II to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 (OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1).

(2)  Fixed for the standard quality defined in Annex I.I to Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001.

(3)  Fixed per 1 % sucrose content.

----
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our report dated March 30, 2010, with respect to the financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. We hereby consentto the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of SRI/Surgical Express, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-31911, effective July 23, 1997; File No. 333-67618, effective August 15, 2001; FileNo. 333-67626, effective August 15, 2001; File No. 333-123616, effective March 28, 2005). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Tampa, Florida 

March 30, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR QUARTER ENDED 9/30/2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1,000

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             7,404
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     10,567
<ALLOWANCES>                                         200
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  22,426
<PP&E>                                             1,975
<DEPRECIATION>                                     1,610
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    26,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             14,866
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                              54
<OTHER-SE>                                        11,525
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      26,504
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  38,067
<CGS>                                             33,749
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     37,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    20
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      711
<INCOME-TAX>                                         327
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  384
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                         384
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .07


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1179 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1179

 To exempt the aging process of distilled spirits from the production 
        period for purposes of capitalization of interest costs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2015

Mr. McConnell (for himself and Mr. Paul) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To exempt the aging process of distilled spirits from the production 
        period for purposes of capitalization of interest costs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Advancing Growth in the Economy 
through Distilled Spirits Act'' or the ``AGED Spirits Act''.

SEC. 2. PRODUCTION PERIOD OF DISTILLED SPIRITS.

    (a) In General.--Section 263A(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5), and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(4) Exemption for aging process of distilled spirits.--
        For purposes of this subsection, the production period shall 
        not include the aging period for distilled spirits (as 
        described in section 5002(a)(8)).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to the production of distilled spirits that begins on or after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                   CALIPER TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Caliper Technologies Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
L. Knighton, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
         operations of the Company.

                                                        /s/ JAMES L. KNIGHTON
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      James L. Knighton
                                                      President and
                                                      Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 28, 2003

------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Caliper Technologies Corp. and will be retained by Caliper
Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
COPY

AFDDC

Subject: Development Assumption of AFCCMFUnctions

To: General White

31 Aug 60

With the iminent dissolution of CCM, occasioned by the SAMOS

reorganization, we are now to . take on the remaining CCM

functions as briefed to yOu previously on 10 144 1960 in connection.

with the reorganization of DCS/Development. These functions are

listed in enclosure 1.

The establishment of the SAXOS organization creates an additional

problem within my staff occasioned by the i rm,Pdiate loss of

Brig. General Curtin and Colonel Martin who are my two key officers

in Advance Technology. These officers must be replaced immediately in

order to avoid serious loss of effectivenesS in my operations.

Additionally, there is , an existing shortage of three officers and

three spaces outstanding for the work load associated with the assertion

of CCM fUnctions.

In light of the above and concurrent with your action on Dr. Charykts

letter to you regarding the establishment of the new SAMOS office,

it is requested that you: (a) confirm the transfer of CCM functions

listed in enclosure 1 as previously agreed and (b) transfer the

following individuals and spaces frOm =to DCS/Development.

Brig. General M. B. Adams vice Brig. General R. D. Curtin

(SAMOS transfer)

Colonel B. W. Gainer vice Colonel J. L. Nhrtin

(SAMOS transfer)

Lt. Colonel P. L. Deimling

Lt. Colonel J. R. Smith

Lt. Colonel G. T. Grottle

The above matter has been discussed in detail with Dr. Charyk as of

this date and he is agreeable with the details of this proposal.

s/

ROSCOE C. WILSON

Lt. Colonel, USAF

Deputy Chief of Staff,

Development

COPY
C 11

Proposed Functions of CCM

To Be Transferred to DCS/Development

Serves as central agency to coordinate, correlate, and

monitor Air Staff actions on the development of weapon/support

systems.

Maintain current status information on development of .

weapon/support systems and provides this infor=ation to other

agencies as appropriate. .

3. Reports, briefs, and analyzes all range launches and tests

for which the Air Force is responsible.
99-999.

#### State v. Ochs.

Knox App. No. 98CA0003. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. On June 10, 1999, appellant filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant has neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by *1491S.Ct.Prac.R. rV(4)(B) nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that appellant show cause within ten days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. IV(6).
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 15

November 12, 1996


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Dear Sirs:

We are aware that MICROS Systems, Inc. has incorporated by reference our report
dated November 12, 1996 (issued pursuant to the provisions of Statement on
Auditing Standards No. 71) in the Prospectus constituting part of its
Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-05125, No. 33-69782, No. 33-44481
and No. 33-33535).  We are also aware of our responsibilities under the
Securities Act of 1933.

Yours very truly,

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP





                                       17