alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 8.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

The following is a list of the Registrants subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2008, other than certain subsidiaries that did not in the aggregate constitute a significant subsidiary.



|                                   |  |                             
|---------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Company Name                       |  | Jurisdictionof Incorporation
|Corbett Research Pty. Ltd          |  | Australia                   
|Corbett Robotics Pty. Ltd          |  | Australia                   
|eGene, Inc.                        |  | Nevada                      
|Gentra Systems, Inc.               |  | Minnesota                   
|PG Biotech Co. Ltd.                |  | China                       
|QIAGEN Australia Holding           |  | Australia                   
|QIAGEN Deutschland Holding GmbH    |  | Germany                     
|QIAGEN Gaithersburg, Inc.          |  | Delaware                    
|QIAGEN GmbH                        |  | Germany                     
|QIAGEN Hamburg GmbH                |  | Germany                     
|QIAGEN, Inc. (USA)                 |  | California                  
|QIAGEN Instruments AG              |  | Switzerland                 
|QIAGEN K.K.                        |  | Japan                       
|QIAGEN Ltd.                        |  | UK                          
|QIAGEN North American Holding Inc. |  | California                  
|QIAGEN NV                          |  | Netherlands                 
|QIAGEN Sciences, Inc.              |  | Maryland
# CA2005110EN.01000301.xml

| 5.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 110/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 110/3

---

RESERVE LISTS
   (1)

RESERVE LISTS

1

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/A/20/04

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/A/20/04

HEADS OF UNIT (A5/A4 - A*9)

HEADS OF UNIT (A5/A4 - A*9)

of Cypriot, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Slovenian and Slovakian citizenship in the following fields: law, macro/microeconomics, statistics, auditing/financial management, European public administration

(2005/C 110 A/01)

Field: Law

MERIT GROUP 1

MERIT GROUP 1

| JAMBOR | ZSUZSANNA |
| --- | --- |
| PINKOWSKI | JAKUB |
| SKUJA | ILONA |

JAMBOR

ZSUZSANNA

PINKOWSKI

JAKUB

SKUJA

ILONA

MERIT GROUP 2

MERIT GROUP 2

| ALEHNO | IVO |
| --- | --- |
| AQUILINA | JACQUELINE |
| BAHOVEC | ZIGA |
| HUBAI | AGNES |
| KOKE | ANDRA |
| KUCZYNSKI | MACIEJ |
| MIČKA | PREMYSL |
| MORICCA | MARCO UMBERTO |
| OBŁOZA | ZBIGNIEW |
| ROHRER | IRENA |
| SPANOU | DESPINA |
| VRYONIDES | DEMETRIS |

ALEHNO

IVO

AQUILINA

JACQUELINE

BAHOVEC

ZIGA

HUBAI

AGNES

KOKE

ANDRA

KUCZYNSKI

MACIEJ

MIČKA

PREMYSL

MORICCA

MARCO UMBERTO

OBŁOZA

ZBIGNIEW

ROHRER

IRENA

SPANOU

DESPINA

VRYONIDES

DEMETRIS

Field: Macro/microeconomics/Statistics

MERIT GROUP 1

MERIT GROUP 1

| ASIMAKIS | YIANNAKIS |
| --- | --- |
| BUTHKEVICIUS | ARUNAS |
| FARI | GABOR |
| HAILIS | STEFANOS |
| NAGY ROTHENGASS | MARTA |
| PANEK | JAN |
| PLANOVSKY | JAN |

ASIMAKIS

YIANNAKIS

BUTHKEVICIUS

ARUNAS

FARI

GABOR

HAILIS

STEFANOS

NAGY ROTHENGASS

MARTA

PANEK

JAN

PLANOVSKY

JAN

MERIT GROUP 2

MERIT GROUP 2

| KUZELKA | ALES |
| --- | --- |
| MOLNAR TAMAS | ANDRAS |
| PAJARSKAS | SARUNAS |

KUZELKA

ALES

MOLNAR TAMAS

ANDRAS

PAJARSKAS

SARUNAS

Field: Auditing/Financial management

| AGRYROU | AGATHOCLIS |
| --- | --- |
| FORMOSA | IAIN |
| GEORGIOU | TOMAZOS |
| HROMIR | VACLAV |
| IOANNOU-SASMATZOGLOU | ANDROULLA |
| PHILANIOTOU | EKATERINI |
| PUKA | ANITA |
| TATIANOS | MICHAEL |
| XUEREB | MICHÈLE |
| ZACH | LESZEK |

AGRYROU

AGATHOCLIS

FORMOSA

IAIN

GEORGIOU

TOMAZOS

HROMIR

VACLAV

IOANNOU-SASMATZOGLOU

ANDROULLA

PHILANIOTOU

EKATERINI

PUKA

ANITA

TATIANOS

MICHAEL

XUEREB

MICHÈLE

ZACH

LESZEK

Field: European public administration

MERIT GROUP 1

MERIT GROUP 1

| CZAPLINSKI | MARCIN |
| --- | --- |
| KOVACS | PETER |
| SZCZYGIEL | MAREK |

CZAPLINSKI

MARCIN

KOVACS

PETER

SZCZYGIEL

MAREK

MERIT GROUP 2

MERIT GROUP 2

| KALAMARZ | WOJCIECH |
| --- | --- |
| KANIA | MACIEJ |
| LOIZIDES | DIMIS |
| NAVIKAS | AUDRIUS |
| ZACHARIADES | VICTOR |

KALAMARZ

WOJCIECH

KANIA

MACIEJ

LOIZIDES

DIMIS

NAVIKAS

AUDRIUS

ZACHARIADES

VICTOR

The lists will be valid until 31 December 2005 and may be extended.

31 December 2005

---

(1)  At a candidate's request, his/her name will not be published.

1

---
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 DORIAN BIF -107-50066-68 

Page 1 of 2 

Copy it of ;- 

TotalPages: 2 

To: M. Gibbs/E. Jones Date: 26 July 1968 

Subject: Bench Test Contrast Data From: B. Siegel 

There are a number of unanswered questions concerning the procedures and 

presented results of this test (see attached questions). However, based upon 

our present understanding of the data we conclude that: 

1. The contrast transmission of this device is unacceptable. According to 

the on-axis data presented, a processing gamma of 2.73 would be required to 

properly view a 2: 1 luminance ratio target. 

2. Light scattering increases significantly off axis, thereby decreasing 

contrast transmission and making it impassible to simulate scene contrast 

across the apparent field. 

The above results are not compatible with data taken in March and are not in 

agreement with subjective viewing of various gamma stimulus. It is vital 

that the contrast transmission of this device be resolved so that stimulus 

requirements can be defined. It is recommended that a meeting be arranged 

to review the results of this test. 

of 

arr 

Attachment: Questions on Contrast Transmission 

Data of the Bench Test 

cc: D. L. DuMond 

F. F. Doppelt 

J. A. Abrahamson 

B. Giordano 

HANDLE VIA BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM ONLY 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

--kairr NEN 

BIF -107-50066-68 

Page 2 of 2 

Attachment 

QUESTIONS ON CONTRAST TRANSMISSION 

DATA OF THE BENCH TEST 

1. Were there three 1/32" diameter disks on the target or was there one 

1/32" diameter disk that was moved to various field locations? 

2. Was a microscope objective used in front of the photomultiplier? Was 

data taken at the target plane? Paragraph 4.1 indicates that a microscope 

was used at the target plane. 

3. How does the calibration table shown relate target and dummy reticle 

background readings? 

4. How was the . 01" pinhole used at the target plane to reduce flare? Was 

it in place while taking reticle plane measurements? 

5. Calculation of contrast transmission is incomprehensible. The calculated 

contrast transmission is almost identical to that resulting from previous data, 

but the data presented shows light scattering increases of 5-6 times previous 

data. 

do-z t 14, ,edi e.t:ti 4 / 

vie h F 

-i'ithrtrit f - DORIAN
Exhibit 12.1


CERTIFICATIONS

I, Ramon Monell V., certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Banco Bilbao Vizcaya
     Argentaria, Chile S.A.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the company and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   [Reserved]

     c)   evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control
          over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by
          this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
          materially affect, the company's internal control over financial
          reporting; and

5.   The company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
     most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
     company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the company's internal
          control over financial reporting.



Date: June 29, 2004
      -----------------

/s/ Ramon Monell V.
-----------------------
[Signature]

Chief Executive Officer
-----------------------
[Title]
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Unified Grocers, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended
March 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard J. Martin, Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
periods presented in the Report.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 13, 2008



/s/    RICHARD J. MARTINRichard J. MartinExecutive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1414 

To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 

to add Rhode Island to the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2015 

Mr. REED (for himself and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 

Management Act to add Rhode Island to the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rhode Island Fisher5 men’s Fairness Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1414 IS

1 SEC. 2. ADDITION OF RHODE ISLAND TO THE MID-ATLAN2 TIC FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL. 

3 Section 302(a)(1)(B) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fish4 ery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 

5 1852(a)(1)(B)) is amended— 

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘Rhode Island,’’ after ‘‘States 

7 of’’; 

8 (2) by inserting ‘‘Rhode Island,’’ after ‘‘except 

9 North Carolina,’’; 

10 (3) by striking ‘‘21’’ and inserting ‘‘23’’; and 

11 (4) by striking ‘‘13’’ and inserting ‘‘14’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

MICROS SYSTEMS, INC.

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, A.L. Giannopoulos, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of MICROS Systems, Inc. (“Registrant”), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005 of the Registrant (the “Report”):

          (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

| Date: February 9, 2006 |   | /s/ A.L. Giannopoulos |
|------------------------|--------|-----------------------|
|                   |   |                       |
|                   |   | A.L. Giannopoulos     |

----
. . . 

" INft~i''''Y ~~ER'r9 

0E~0921}A/fh 

·6,fJClfiI7:1 

·~·'J.ANl91t 

of Naval ~Ope:ra;tion~:·,,"~~i~l~ .,...'iI'\lI'."'"...· .. i $IGI~ a.ssets,,~o'JiS'(i~ .. 

oo;~aIlL""~lq;nre ... , ...... <;; .. ,."" ... was aac~pi;edwith pi~~~e~ cr?1!"el"AiL: b~6'G ~t '~vy l"equil"e~nt~~':>:(t:'~€1 

""''f'.~illll,!i''',:·li'I''I'I' Ql)'tllTJi~\jtm p~~1od!tor tha eOndutIt ot1)h*;j~'Gib: 

AA;;·~J~:t';L'\rlc'ttY' bt the Soviet fleet, fiorma1ly: eX'l)e~te:Ot,: 

. . 

r.efererice, (a )waiir 'W'.l:'J. ttf'ln, di.scussions between relr!rE!Se:'ll'ta.t:ivE~,$ 

J:Tavy/' the::E'rogrq;ni;,Cstaf'r, and the NRO have resulted the .'4C''','''~~.' 

of. a testof"STRAWMAN:atldTRlPOS/SOUSEA G};uring a forthcoming, 

'exerCii:;e;..,.c6(ie;naroedADMIXTURE., This' te'8t, to cOll:'llllence 'r.'I~''''._ .. _ 1971 off the California coast, appear~o offer an 

:'0'PP()rtun:tty ,to cOl1ductextended support operatiJ)us, iPiGludingdistri...;" 

. product 'to the fleet. commander • 'Fhe Navy Sitr;wgly endorses. 

,evaluation. ',At th:t.stiIDe;".",;it can not be deteriirl.ne~l tba:ta.l)..t,est" '. . in tb~", iJas'lc NRO.proposal will be lI1:et;., particularly .. 

relitr3 .to geolocations on large n'W!iifters if>t Soviet, . .... <:i'lt;oill.J ... J.C.· <;>n of a product to overseas:"'fleeiic.oll'lll:!a.lld;e.:i;'s. 

On otherJ~andi it is believed t"ha.t ,sufficient object:!.ves Wi11oe;met 

to make. this exercise well worl.hwhile. . 

" 3. TJ;1e Navy woul9't be most '" 6~::Hlistthe .NRO in "allY' :manner nece~sary 

in preparing for 'this' test. A ,,:::pre~entti:me, meetings are~~ing held 

to. ass~i+e: closecQP~aipation. f(:ts··~C!.~:rstoOd that the NRO wtlisp~nsor 

therequire:ment f'.qr::tbis test atthej;3:0RS:;.the Navy representative will 

acti'\[ 31y support this Jre'quirement)"jii~;:wilJ.;I.if desired,j.oin' in the . SpOhSor,ship. ..,. .;'. , . 

Copy to: 

CNM " 

OP .. Os 

Op-ClT·' 

TOPSEC~1T EARl?Ol?·.· " ~" ." . 

li.M'tQLE 'VlA :anMAit;CONiROL: BYS \ ":,, ,1':;." ", '. " ~ t 

for Release: 2017/08/16 COS099766i __ m.a_
The Honorable Warren K. Ur bom, United States District Judge for the District 1 of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2210

___________ Robert Miller Pope, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. United States of America, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: December 14, 1998 Filed: December 30, 1998

___________ Before FAGG, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Aftera jury found Robert Miller Pope guilty of conspiring to distribut e marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and of money laundering, in violation o f 18 U.S.C. § 1956, we affirmed his convictions and sentence on direct appeal. Se e United States v. Pope , 989 F.2d 506 (8th Cir. Mar. 11, 1993) (unpubli shed per curiam). Pope then filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion raising five claims for relief, all of which were rejected by the district court following a hearing. In this appeal from the denial 1 of his-2-

motion, the only issue before us is whether Pope & s counsel was ineffective for failing to prope rly present at sentencing evidence of Pope & s allegedly minor role in th e offens e, as grounds for a two-level reduction under U.S. Sentencing Guideline s Manual § 3B1.2(b) (1997). We affirm.
We co nclude Pope & s ineffective-assistance claim fails. After specificall y considering the evidence Pope contends counsel should have offered at sentencing, the districtcourt reaffirmed its prior conclusion that Pope was not entitled to the rol e reduction, see Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 687 ( 1984) (movant must show bo thdeficient performance and resulting prejudice), noting that Pope & s involvemen t in the conspiracy was substantial, even if shorter in duration than that of other co

conspirators, see United States v. J ones , 145 F.3d 959, 963 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 67 U.S.L.W . 3322 (U.S. Nov. 9, 1998) (No. 98-6369); cf. United States v. Snoddy , 139 F.3d 1224, 1228 (8th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 8.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

The following is a list of the Registrants subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006, other
than certain subsidiaries that did not in the aggregate constitute a significant subsidiary.



|                                   |  |                             
|---------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Company Name                       |  | Jurisdiction ofIncorporation
|QIAGEN BV                          |  | The Netherlands             
|QIAGEN Deutschland Holding GmbH    |  | Germany                     
|QIAGEN GmbH                        |  | Germany                     
|QIAGEN Finance (Deutschland) GmbH  |  | Germany                     
|QIAGEN Hamburg GmbH                |  | Germany                     
|QIAGEN, Inc. (Canada)              |  | Canada                      
|QIAGEN, Inc. (USA)                 |  | California                  
|QIAGEN Instruments AG              |  | Switzerland                 
|QIAGEN KK                          |  | Japan                       
|QIAGEN Ltd.                        |  | UK                          
|QIAGEN North American Holding Inc. |  | California                  
|QIAGEN NV                          |  | Netherlands                 
|QIAGEN Pty. Ltd.                   |  | Australia                   
|QIAGEN S.A.                        |  | France                      
|QIAGEN Sciences, Inc.              |  | Maryland                    
|QIAGEN Shared Services, Inc.       |  | Maryland                    
|QIAGEN SpA                         |  | Italy                       
|QIAGEN Vertriebsges. mbH           |  | Austria                     
|Genaco Biomedical Products, Inc.   |  | USA                         
|Gentra Systems, Inc.               |  | USA                         
|Nextal Biotechnology Inc.          |  | Canada                      
|Shenzhen PG Biotech Co. Ltd.       |  | China
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                       5

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                    415,271
<SECURITIES>                              399,000
<RECEIVABLES>                              14,364
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          828,635
<PP&E>                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            828,635
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   1,498,859
<BONDS>                                 9,393,572
<COMMON>                                   77,570
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                            (10,141,366)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              828,635
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           18,337
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             123,047
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           70,927
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        233,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (409,337)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (409,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                             (409,337)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (0.050)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (0.050)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 3.2


                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                             ARTICLES OF CORPORATION

Pursuant to the provisions of the Colorado Business Corporations Act, the
undersigned corporation adopts the following Articles of Amendment to its
Articles of Incorporation:

FIRST:      The name of the corporation is Boulder Capital Opportunities, Inc.

SECOND:     The following amendment to the Articles of Incorporation was
            adopted on August 12, 1999, as prescribed by the Colorado Business
            Corporation Act, in the manner marked with an X below:

            No shares have been issued or Directors elected - Action by
            Incorporators
 -----

            No shares have been issued but Directors elected - Action by
            Directors
-----

            Such amendment was adopted by the board of directors where shares
-----       have been issued and shareholder action was not required.

  X         Such amendment was adopted by vote of the shareholders. The number
-----       of shares voted for the amendment was sufficient for approval.

THIRD:      If changing corporate name, the new name of the corporation is Stan
Lee Media, Inc.

FOURTH:     The manner, if not set forth in such amendment, in which any
exchange, reclassification, or cancellation of issued shares provided for in the
amendment shall be effected, is as follows: n/a.

If these amendments are to have a delayed effective date, please list that
date: n/a/.



                                            Signature:   /s/ Gill Champion
                                                      --------------------------
                                            Title:     Chief Operating Officer