alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                       FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is made this ____ day of 
February, 1998 between EarthLink Network, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the 
"Company") and Charles G. Betty (the "Employee").

                                      RECITALS

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has determined that it is 
in the best interests of the shareholders of the Company to enter into a 
strategic relationship in the area of Internet access and related services 
with Steven Corporation ("Steven") and its affiliates, pursuant an Investment 
Agreement, dated as of February __, 1998 among Steven, Steven Communications 
Company, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("Steven Sub"), Newco, Inc., a 
Delaware corporation ("Newco") and its subsidiary (the "Investment 
Agreement");

     WHEREAS, as a condition to the consummation of the transactions 
contemplated in the Investment Agreement (COPY TO COME);

     WHEREAS, the Company and Employee have agreed to execute and deliver 
this Amendment to satisfy such condition and as an inducement to Steven and 
Steven Sub to enter into transactions contemplated in the Investment 
Agreement;

     NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and 
sufficiency of which hereby are acknowledged, Company and Employee agree as 
follows:

     SECTION 1(b) - DEFINITIONS.  "Change in Control."  Amend subsection (b) 
of Section 1 to add the following sentence to the end of the subparagraph:

          "Notwithstanding the foregoing, none of the transactions 
          contemplated by that certain Investment Agreement, dated as of 
          February __, 1998, among Steven Corporation, a Kansas corporation, 
          Steven Communications Company, LP, a Delaware limited partnership, 
          the Company, Newco, Inc., a Delaware corporation and Newco Sub, a 
          Delaware corporation either individually or in the aggregate, shall 
          be deemed to be a "change in control event"."
          
     This Amendment, and the rights of the parties hereunder, shall be 
governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of 
California.

                                       1

<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Employee and the Company have executed and delivered 
this Agreement as of the date first shown above.

                         EMPLOYEE:


                         /s/ Charles G. Betty
                         ----------------------------------------
                         Charles G. Betty


                         THE COMPANY:

                         EARTHLINK NETWORK, INC.



                         By: /s/ Sky D. Dayton
                            -------------------------------------
                         Title:  Founder and Chairman


                                     2
EXHIBIT (32)



South Street Financial Corp.

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of South Street Financial Corp. (the Company) certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                            
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Dated: March 29, 2005 |  | /s/ R. Ronald Swanner      
|                      |  | R. Ronald Swanner          
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer    
|                      | 
|Dated: March 29, 2005 |  | /s/ Christopher F. Cranford
|                      |  | Christopher F. Cranford    
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
Order filed February 10, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00572-CV

____________

RICHARD ALAN HAASE, Appellant

V.

ABRAHAM, WATKINS, NICHOLS, SORRELS AND FRIEND, LLP AND 

RANDY SORRELLS, Appellees

On Appeal from the 80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-17970

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due October 20, 2014. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. On December 18, 2014, the official court reporter, Michelle Tucker, 

filed one volume of the reporter’s record covering the hearing on appellant’s 

motion for new trial on June 20, 2014. On February 5, 2015, appellant filed a 

motion for extension of time to file his brief until a supplemental reporter’s record 
from the March 28, 2014, hearing has been filed. To date, the court has been 

unable to confirm whether a record was made of a hearing held on or about March 

28, 2104. Accordingly, we issue the following order:

We order Michelle Tucker, the official court reporter, to provide written 

responses or before February 20, 2015, to the following requests for information:

1. Did the trial court conduct a hearing in this case on or about March 

28, 2014?

2. If so, was the hearing reported? 

3. If the hearing was reported, was it reported by the official court 

reporter or a substitute court reporter? 

4. If the hearing was reported by a substitute court reporter, identify 

the substitute reporter and provide his/her contact information.

If the requested hearing was reported, we further order Michelle Tucker to 

file, or ensure that the substitute reporter files, a supplemental reporter’s record

from the hearing held on or about March 28, 2014, with the clerk of this court on 

or before March 6, 2015. 

Appellant’s brief shall be due seven days after the supplemental reporter’s 

record is filed, or if no record was made of the requested hearing, the brief shall be 

due seven days after written confirmation of that fact is filed by the official court 

reporter.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and McCally.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03086]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--PXI System Alliance, Inc

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 16, 2015, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. 
has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its 
membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, SMH 
Technologies Srl, Villotta di Chions PN, ITALY, has been added as a 
party to this venture.
    Also, Sundance Multiprocessor Technology Ltd., Chesham Bucks, 
England, UNITED KINGDOM, has withdrawn as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. intends 
to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On November 22, 2000, PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. filed its original 
notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 
6(b) of the Act on March 8, 2001 (66 FR 13971).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on
    October 28, 2014. A notice was published in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 26, 2014 (79 FR 70555).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2015-03086 Filed 2-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         244,346
<SECURITIES>                                 1,750,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,893
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    103,142
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,452,303
<PP&E>                                       3,876,918
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,628,404
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,135,859
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,182,755
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  6,000,000
<COMMON>                                       103,784
<OTHER-SE>                                  (2,553,904)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,135,859
<SALES>                                      2,632,213
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,632,213
<CGS>                                        2,463,940
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,577,034
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               306,112
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             251,566
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,846,792
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,846,792
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,846,792
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.81
        

</TABLE>
#### Peterson, Respondent, vs. Peterson and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Sanborn, Blake & Ah erg, Ernest EL Pett,*and *George Blake,*all of Madison.

For the respondent: *Crawford & Crawford*of Superior.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05112425 

TOP SECRET CONTROL $Y5T[lil 

/NATIONAL _RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

TALENTWASHINGTON 1 D,C, 

I 11111111111111111111111111111111111 lllll 1111111111111111111 ~II 14 00064282D 

February 20, 1969 

MEMORANDUM FOR GENERAL SMART, NASA 

SUBJECT: Broadening the Availability of Satellite Reconnaissance 

--..... Policy Information 

In our day-to-day operations, we frequently find it useful to 

exhibit and discuss the actual document describing the national 

policy applicable to NASA earth-sensing activities (NSAM 156 

Committee Report of .July 1966). Occasionally we are inhibited 

by the fact that the document is in the BYEMAN security system 

and the person with whom _we are dealing is only TALENT-KEYHOLE 

cleared. 

Recently we discussed this problem with the BYEMAN Control 

:officer at the State Department, pointing out that the deletion of 

,\two words, superfluous in themselves, would convert the policy 

··paper from BYEMAN to TALENT-KEYHOLE and considerably 

... . ,.

· broaden its usefulness to NASA and the DOD. We now have State's 

, · concurrence in taking this action and have prepared a certified 

HANDLE VIA 

.· TALENT-KEYHOLE version of the document. I have attached a 

.. copy for whatevt!r use you may wish to make of it. 

/ 

PA"£!L E. 

2. 

WORTHMAN. 

~,v(....{.,c. ~ 

Attachment 

Colonel, USAF 

Dej)μty Director 

\ ' ' 

BYEMAN/ TALENT-KEYHOLE TBP SEeRET CONTROLNO BYE 12611-69 

cm r:L(}/o, _ __,...._co,iu 

CONTROL SYSTEM UClUDEO FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING PAGE 1 Of i PAGU 

DOD OIREC:TIVE UD0.10 DOU NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05112425 

qo~-=?:Q ~ooq
-10P-SECREF

Y111,1anie 111161111111

Control tidla

-TOP-206212-

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

OFFICE OF Mt CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

WASHINGTON. D. C. *0350 •

IMOININ IMMO TO

Ihr

August 1966

Prom, Victor, Director, Program "C"

To: Director, National Reconnaissance Office

Sabi: Proven C Director; change of

As of 22 July, Admiral maw Int relieved emas Director of Naval

elligence. Unless otherwise directed, I recommend that Admiral

'LUCKEY relieve me as Director Program C effective 1 Sept 1966.

Admiral MOM is knowledgsable of 

iefed by The Naval Research Laboratory and N

ProjellijIlInd has been

Page ;. of 1 Page

Copy L of copies

EACuIDED IRON 

Au:valutc IKGRagg

OW OR 5.930 

IS DOIS i7 APPLY
Approved for Release: 2022/02/10 C05134201,T 

I or .JtGRC 

, .. NDtE "1A 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL 5HTEM 

' .J,lil'1"'NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

IIIIIIIIIIIJ- 111 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

THE NRO STAFF September 1, 1971 

BYEMAN CONIROL srs, ... 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 

SUBJECT: Call from Dwayne Anderson, OSD(ISA) 

Dwayne Anderson called this afternoon from New York 

to relate two recent activities of interest to the U.S. 

UN outer Space delegation. 

He first discussed the bilateral meeting with the 

Soviets which is discussing priorities of future activity 

for the Committee on Peaceful Uses of Outer Space. The 

Soviets were '.soliciting US support on their proposed Moon 

Treaty. Since this treaty is redundant in many regards 

to the 1967 Treaty, the consensus is that it was proposed 

largely as a time consumer. The US will support the 

Soviet proposal. 

Next Mr. Anderson mentioned an article which recently 

was authored by Mr. G. P. Zukov on Space Law. The Russian 

voiced concern of potential problems with earth resources 

surveys if there was a possibility of uncontrolled economic 

spying. He said that any definitive space law should 

attempt to prevent this type of occurrence. 

Mr. Anderson also stated that Herb Reis was very 

appreciative of our recent visit. I thanked Anderson 

for his call and expressed appreciation for the information. 

'-/--

HAROLD S. COYLE, JR. 

Major, USAF 

TBP SECRET <'C<oO,D FROM AOTOM.,<C _,GRAO<~G 

000 OIH,~flV> S,0~ 10 O~,S NOl •ee<Y 

Approved for Release: 2022/02/10 C05134201 

W' 

c~•,•o• ,o Internal
** **

**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Borivoje Vukadinovic,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed thisannual report on Form 10-KSB of Retrospettiva, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisannual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the small business as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report.

 

4. I am responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for thesmall business issuer and have:

 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5. I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the smallbusiness issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date:     February 11,2008

 
| By:    | /s/ Borivoje Vukadinovic                             |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Borivoje Vukadinovic                                 |
|   | Chief Executive Officer  and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Argued and submitted September 14,

affirmed October 10, 1990

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*DALE REGINALD SCOTT, *Appellant.*

(89-02-30697; CA A62140)

798 P2d 268

Howard Clyman, West Linn, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Marianne Ghim, Certified Law Student, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Ann Kelley, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

Before Joseph, Chief Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *State v. Clevenger,*297 Or 234, 683 P2d 1360 (1984).
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-47851, 333-47843, 333-47059, and 333-46991) of
FlexiInternational Software, Inc. of our report dated January 26, 1998, except
as to Note 2 which is as of February 3, 1998 appearing on page F-2 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference
of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule, appearing in this Form 10-K.



                                                      /s/ Price Waterhouse LLP


PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
March 27, 1998
Stanford, Connecticut
*Friday, September 3, 1999*

DISCIPLINARY DOCKET

97-2186.

#### Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Chandler.

(Corrected order, originally filed June 29, 1999): On April 22, 1998, this court indefinitely suspended respondent, Everett Alfred Chandler, from the practice of law pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(2). On March 29,1999, this court, *sua sponte,*ordered respondent to show cause why he should not be found in contempt for failure to comply with this court’s April 22,1998 order, to wit, failure to surrender his Certificate of Admission and failure to file an affidavit of compliance on or before May 22, 1998. Respondent did not respond to the show cause order. On May 12, 1999, movant, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a motion for order to appear and show cause, requesting the court to issue an order directing respondent to appear and show cause why he should not be found in contempt for his failure to comply with this court’s April 22,1998 order. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that, in regard to the show cause order issued by this court on March 29, 1999, respondent appeal- in person before this court on Wednesday, July 28, 1999, at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that movant’s motion be and hereby is, granted, and that respondent show cause why he should not be found in contempt for failure to obey this court’s April 22,1998 order, by filing a written response with the court at or before 9:00 a.m. on July 28, 1999.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, *sua sponte,*that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1).

Douglas, J., would order respondent to show cause.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           3,474                   1,415
<SECURITIES>                                     8,025                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,766                   3,199
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,090                   4,920
<PP&E>                                           2,166                   1,582
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,128                     820
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,258                   6,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,273                   3,079
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                   4,804
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             7                     799
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,842                 (2,766)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,258                   6,182
<SALES>                                         13,406                   8,333
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,703                  10,468
<CGS>                                              585                     316
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,515                   2,139
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,094                   (933)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (813)                      29
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,907                   (962)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,907                   (962)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29                   (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>