alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      10,722,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,176,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   282,000
<INVENTORY>                                  8,867,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            30,503,000
<PP&E>                                      46,969,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              25,334,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,205,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,501,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,079,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,205,000
<SALES>                                     38,977,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            38,977,000
<CGS>                                       28,291,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,291,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,007,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                76,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,507,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,870,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,637,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47
        

</TABLE>
#### The State *v.*Willie Clemons.

■The act of 1794, ( *Rev c.*406,) to prevent owners of slaves from hiring to them their time, does not subject the master to an indictment, the x-emedy being against the slave alone.

The defendant was convicted on the following indictment :

“ The jurors for the Slate, upon their oath, present that *Willie Clem“ons,*late of, &c. on 8cc. with force and arms at, &c. unlawfully did *“*permit his slave by the name of March to hire his own time to divers “ persons, to the jurors aforesaid unknown, contrary to the act of the “General Assembly, in such case made and provided, and against,' &c.

The defendant was convicted and judgment for the State being rendered by Daniel Judge, on the last circuit at Beaufort, he appealed.

No counsel appeared for the defendant.

The *Attorney-General*for the State.'

Ruffin, Judge.

—

This is an indictment against the master; and it is founded on a misconception of the act of 1794. The statute directs the grand jury, to make “presentment of any slave.” The great purpose of the act is to prevent and abate the nuisance, as was said in *Woodman’s*case. The proceeding is therefore primarily against that; and the notice to the master is to give him an opportunity, as in other cases, of defending his slave, and not defending himself personally. It is tx*ue, the on net* is indirectly punished, by having his slave hired out for one year. But that is only the incidental consequence of the judgment. The personal liability of the master, is for the penalty of twenty pounds. The act does not make him guilty of a misdemeanor, nor subject him to indictment.

The judgment of the Superior Court is therefore reversed, and the judgment arrested.

Per Curiam. — Judgment reversed.
# C_2005093EN.01000201.xml

| 16.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/2

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 17 February 2005

in Case C-134/03: (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Genova-Voltri) Viacom Outdoor Srl v Giotto Immobilier SARL (1)

1

(Freedom to provide services - Competition - Bill-posting services - Domestic legislation imposing a municipal tax on advertising - Supply by municipalities of a public bill-posting service - Power of the municipalities to regulate the supply of bill-posting services - Internal taxation not discriminatory)

(2005/C 93/03)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-134/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Giudice di pace di Genova-Voltri (Italy), by decision of 10 March 2003, received at the Court on 25 March 2003, in the proceedings between Viacom Outdoor Srl v Giotto Immobilier SARL – the Court (Third Chamber), composed of A. Rosas (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, A. Borg Barthet, J.-P. Puissochet, J. Malenovský and U. Lõhmus, Judges; J. Kokott, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 17 February 2005, in which it rules that:

Viacom Outdoor Srl

Giotto Immobilier SARL

| 1. | The questions concerning the interpretation of Articles 82 EC, 86 EC, 87 EC and 88 EC are inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The questions concerning the interpretation of Articles 82 EC, 86 EC, 87 EC and 88 EC are inadmissible;

| 2. | Article 49 EC does not preclude the levying of a tax such as the municipal tax on advertising imposed by the Decreto legislativo No 507 – Revisione ed armonizzazione dell'imposta comunale sulla pubblicità e del diritto sulle pubbliche affissioni (Legislative Decree No 507 revising and harmonising municipal advertising tax and bill-posting duty) of 15 November 1993. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 49 EC does not preclude the levying of a tax such as the municipal tax on advertising imposed by the Decreto legislativo No 507 – Revisione ed armonizzazione dell'imposta comunale sulla pubblicità e del diritto sulle pubbliche affissioni (Legislative Decree No 507 revising and harmonising municipal advertising tax and bill-posting duty) of 15 November 1993.

---

(1)  OJ C 146 of 21.06.2003.

1

---
Exhibit 32



Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Somerset International Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the six months ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John X. Adiletta, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the results of operations of the Company.







|                |  |                         | 
|--------------- |  | ----------------------- | 
|August 14, 2007 |  | /s/ John X. Adiletta    | 
|                |  | John X. Adiletta        | 
|                |  | Chief Executive Officer | 
|                |  | Chief Financial Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                  
<ARTICLE>               9
<LEGEND>                        
          
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from audited financial statements and guide 3 summary           
financial information and is qualified in its entirety by reference to          
such data.              
</LEGEND>          
<CIK>                      0000320387 
<NAME>                     First M & F Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>               1000
                        
<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                          21,522
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>           5,722
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                22,100
<TRADING-ASSETS>                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>     93,889
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>          55,142
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>            54,914
<LOANS>                        342,052
<ALLOWANCE>                      4,570
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 554,845
<DEPOSITS>                     494,938
<SHORT-TERM>                     2,612
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>              5,039
<LONG-TERM>                      2,494
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                        16,973
<OTHER-SE>                      32,789
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY> 554,845
<INTEREST-LOAN>                  8,216
<INTEREST-INVEST>                2,060
<INTEREST-OTHER>                   238
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                10,514
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>               4,799
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               4,884
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>            5,630
<LOAN-LOSSES>                      394
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                   0 
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                  3,697
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  2,645
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>       2,645
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                     1,895
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                     0.56
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                    4.54
<LOANS-NON>                        275
<LOANS-PAST>                       910
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                 4,475
<CHARGE-OFFS>                      285
<RECOVERIES>                        55
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                4,570
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>             4,168
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>            402
                                


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Jost Fischer, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sirona Dental Systems, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|December 7, 2007 |  | /s/JOST FISCHER
|---------------- |  | ---------------
|                 |  | Name:          
|                 |  | Title:         

---



QuickLinks
DEC 14 1956

wWiR

suysecr: Nesting of Yochnical Advisors -to YS 1171.

me Devologrant Center .
° it Air
anaee WCLOT-3, He. A. Bell
Sright-Patterson Air Force 3230, Ohio

1. The HS 171 WSPO 4s required to prepare and submit, by the
indicsted gates, the following items:

& 1 Fobruery 1957

A definitive statemont of work for the contract with
lockhend's ISecile Cysten Division.

be 5 Februcry 1957
4a itextce2 bill of matericls for al) ovbsystens,
. 2 April 1957
4 revised XD? Devolopzcnt 2lan WS 1171.
2. In order to meet tio above scisde2e and inour the least
inceavonience on the part of atten4i:.; individuals, all three of the
Sbovo itsns will be considered in a.mscting held at WON during tho

third end fourth weeks of January 1957. A nore detailed schedule
of events is es fclicxs:

a. ly Jamesy 1957
Individuals fron the ARDC Conters begin to convens at

wD.
b. 15 Jenuary 1957

Tho Missile System Division of Lookheed will submit a
Proposed definitive statonent of work.



A ie Rr nnn,

e
ve memset

©. 23 Janunzy 1957 : i
Tho WS 1171 WSPO ani the Technical Advisory Group will
have accomplished: 1 .

(1) A definitive statement of work to bo usod as tho
. besis for onsuing discussions with Locxhoed,

(2) 4 coordinated ARDUX 60q; documentation.

(3) dn Atawized 121 of materials for ll ocbaystons,
‘with perticular emphasis on items of OFS which will require
action during lato FY 57 or carly FY 58.

ad. 23 = 25 January 1957

Sno WS IL7L WS20 and the Technical Advisory Group will
meet with roprosontativus of the Itissilo ‘yctom Division of Losihocd
to coordinate « mutually acceptcdlo definitive statexont of work for
the entire “S 1171 Progran. .

3. the Wright Air Devoloz-snt Center is roquosted io cont
representctivss to this sectiny ot WD, cul the cttending roprosontes
tives should bs those individuals tho ho. Som assigned tho responsie
bality of providing technics? pzidanco ind cosistanee to 'S 117Le .
Since there aro so mony aress s3signed to UAbS, a stansered selsc)
of visits is dcsircé 4a som> socca, thercfora, the foliccing psople
or their substitctes should attend cs follews:

Q. ix. Donald Reyaclds, Will, 15 end 16 January
be Gaptain Ralph 5. Decker, dre, ICLPN, 16 thru 23 Jenuary
Ce Iioutensnt Joba Kiltes or Lieutenmt Wu. iren, WLR,
17 thru 22 Jamsary
@. itr. Jams H. Huckchy, WCLRW, 17 thru 23 January
ee. hr. Luthor H, Meussr, WCLIR, 22 thru 22 Janucry
ft J/licutonant Carl £, Johnson, WOLP, 16 thra 18 January,
Be Visoutment Willios C, Covington, WOLG, 26 thru 23 ‘|
jonuasy
he J/Iseutenant Msleoln R. Malcozsen, WCLCE, 16 thru 23
January
Tre other representatives should cttond S the period of
1S to 18 Jemury, ani Hrs A. Le Ball should plan on being preeece
Guring the period of 15 thra 25 Jenuery.

L. Sscurtty clearances and requosts for hotel accomodations
should be forvarded to Western Developmant Division, ATT{: ‘sik,
no later then 7 January 1957.


oa 2

S. Point of contact for ropresontatives from your Center will
be Lieutenant Colonel Frederic C. 2. Oier (KDTR), located in Suilding
5, Roon 512, Extensior. 1313, 5755 Nest $Sth Street, Los Angolos,

FOR THE COMAGDER:

SIGNED

THDIETS O. 5, OO

UDTR as
JS Cocdberch 1313
11111111--

NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

e

•

THE NRO STAFF

• 17 September 1974

MEMORANDUM FOR ADMIRAL SAPPINGTON, WSEG

SUBJECT: NRO Guidance and Assistance to WSEG in Study

of WWMCCS Related R&D

Reference your letter, subject as above, TCS 95805/74.

I asked my Staff to determine the best source of information relating to R&D information and considered possibly significant to future developments by the NRO in support of its

National Reconnaissance Program and that pertain to future

WWMCCS capabilities.

In order to try to determine an overall balanced and •

coherent viewpoint of various technologies vis-a-vis sensors,

communications, and data processing and other things, it

appears that a possible approach would be for you to contact

the Intelligence Research and Development Council, which is

a permanent subcommittee of the Intelligence Resources Advisory

Committee, and is chaired by Dr. Currie, DDR&E. The function

of the Council is to explore new directions and techniques in

those hard and soft sciences which hold promise for intelligence and which should receive program resource support and

application. It is the Council's responsibility to maintain

a continuing knowledge of the allocation and uses of R&D

resources related to intelligence and to advise IRAC on R&D

strategy and technology that will best contribute to the

attainment of national intelligence objectives.

I suggest the above approach since the Council and

Committee's responsibility are to focus full-time on resources

and R&D, which is not the case for the NRO. We certainly place

great emphasis on exploiting R&D technology and strategy but

1. •

•

MeINIMIDel 11/11

0ww+ ►.a►►rr$MStrafeammaRea

SrAMMO 01 MeAMMI 1011ell Mee 1 e

IMMIMUIllaem• 0

MNIMMIGINS 1 Mel IMM111011

m.....emeporro

tra• dimmer • .1.7.

Ss-/

CON', ROL NOYSIR5911

COPY OS _COPS

PAGE _12,_ PAO Fr
ON.

•

must also concern ourselves with the day-to-day operation, inter

alia, of the NRP. Perhaps our referral to the Council, which

should have a better overall perspective from an R&D standpoint,

will be the most beneficial source of information to you. If

it isn't the case, please let me know so that other arrangements

may be considered.

Finally, I would suggest that your specific requests seem

to indicate a tendency toward NSA-related activities. For

those type of activities, Gen Allen's people are, of course,

the best source for that information. And the Defense Nuclear

Agency could also be considered a source regarding nuclear

aspects.

Please let me know how your effort proceeds. We would

be pleased to answer specific questions you may develop during

this phase of the study and look forward to reviewing the draft.

JOHN E. KULPA,

Brigadier General, USAF

Director

Ililii)11/111!!i* ea Lon • riTr".".

sum ruswienr• iiat ce" mommmow mw JCS37590-74 

eM

.

VOLUM a: IA II. *X.. GO Mb Of INICOMVI OWN SMOGS ""

et

•••1 dr• 

teats NCI AWED% 9 to 2

CONES
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-60271

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JAMES ALLEN MORRIS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:02-CR-74-1

Before KING, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James Allen Morris, federal prisoner # 11614-042, seeks leave to proceed 

in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. He challenges the district court’s denial of 

his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motions. Morris argues that he was not sentenced 

as a career offender, but rather his sentence was determined based upon the 

quantity of crack cocaine that was involved in his offense. He therefore 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 11, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-60271 Document: 00512436877 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/11/2013
No. 13-60271

contends that amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines that govern crack 

cocaine offenses should apply in his case and his sentence should be reduced.

By moving to proceed IFP, Morris is challenging the district court’s 

certification decision that his appeal was not taken in good faith because it is 

frivolous. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). “An 

investigation into the [IFP] movant’s objective good faith, while necessitating 

a brief inquiry into the merits of an appeal, does not require that probable 

success be shown.” Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Rather, 

this court’s inquiry “is limited to whether the appeal involves legal points 

arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).” Id. (internal quotation 

marks and citation omitted). The district court’s decision whether to reduce a 

sentence under § 3582(c)(2) is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. United 

States v. Evans, 587 F.3d 667, 672 (5th Cir. 2009).

Morris’s assertion that he was not sentenced as a career offender is 

incorrect. The calculations in the presentence report, which the district court 

adopted at sentencing, reflect that Morris qualified as a career offender and 

that his offense level was derived from the career offender guidelines. “The 

crack cocaine guidelines amendments do not apply to prisoners sentenced as 

career offenders.” See United States v. Anderson, 591 F.3d 789, 791 (5th Cir. 

2009). Thus, the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying 

§ 3582(c)(2) relief. See Evans, 587 F.3d at 672. 

As Morris has failed to demonstrate that his appeal involves legal points 

that are not frivolous, his IFP motion is DENIED. See Howard, 707 F.2d at 

220. Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. Baugh, 117 F.3d at 

202 n.24; 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-60271 Document: 00512436877 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/11/2013
Co.)1--ACt

•

.:::

: • • t: :.:4"..;;*

.*: • .*:..‘ 2.: 1::5 ...

. •.•••n•mm.,./.....O••••••n••YN••••• nn'......1

-Tr) SFer4Cf Wan

/2 k -- /

A 4k

.,,erc 44'2 -/ -20

+ ►1

X2141111011,

27 July 1062

mt:oaturP..tra VCR The Chairman, United States Intelligence Board

SITBZECT: (TS) NBO Interface with the USIB

Since the 0-Naticnal Reconnaissance Office is chartered to

respond only to United States Intelligence Board requirements in

establishing and conducting the (T3) National Reconnaissance Program;

It woula nee= essential that a good world.ng htterface be established

between the USE and the-iaWrio. This interface would assure that the

WM is fully and currently informed on all pertinent-013RO matters

relevant to its deliberations and decisions, so that these actions may be

taken in full imowledge of fl'SM.RP capebilities and limitatices which

apply. It also would assure that the -01:11i0 has a complete understanding of the U5113 intent in regard to requirements and priorities. In

addition, I believe that it :cold constitute an eoseatt:J. step in establishIna' the teamwork which will be required to realize the fgll potential of

advanced collection projects under development.

I suggest, therefore, that the -(S)NRO be represented on the

rincipal subsidiary comniiftee(s)-of the UM3 which are concerned with

the-CTO)N111). In view of the specific relationship between the U3D3 and

the l":0, I would view an ex-ofacio membership arrangement to be .

cost appropriate.

Within the -0NRO, the establishment and maintenance of the

-(E) 20 inte.rface with the USIS, and the coordination of all peripheral

rocoartaiscazoo activities of the U. S. with the missions of the RP

are responsibilities of the-ONRO staff. (See Incl #1. ) Accordingly,

I would like to request that you consider desiation of the Deputy for

Cparatices (of the-(S)N130 staff) as an ex-officio member of the COMM,

with one of hie of:ace-LT.4 as his alternate. Whether there also should be

ex-officio membership from thelS)NRO staff on the SIGINT committee

. would seem to depend upon the use to be made of that committee in regard

. toi-T-6}NR.P projects as discussed in my memorandum to you of 5 June 62.

1 1-ne/

-(--7-5)--=emo re org. &

functions of NRO, dtd

3 .1-nly 1.962, cy 12.

Toseph V. Charyk ras Director . 5A

-(8)-National Reconnaissance Office
# C_2005006EN.01003204.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/32

---

Removal from the register of Case C-117/04 (1)

1

(2005/C 6/62)

(Language of the case: Italian)

(Language of the case: Italian)

By order of 6 July 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-117/04: Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic.

---

(1)   OJ C 106 of 30.4.2004.

1

---