alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002I, Shin Bae Kim, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of SK Telecom Co., Ltd.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) for the company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:June 30, 2006       /s/ **Shin Bae Kim**            Shin Bae Kim    Chief Executive Officer  
E-1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,876
<SECURITIES>                                     3,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,853
<ALLOWANCES>                                       812
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,916
<PP&E>                                           5,853
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,121
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,911
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,419
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           174
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,440
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,911
<SALES>                                         10,542
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,296
<CGS>                                            1,757
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,341
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,066
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,231)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,231)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,231)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.02)


</TABLE>
[ORIG OR REFERS TO

75-2: PAD’ z nr 1200: 36 Pbr onc ave. 4962. ‘THE ‘PRDAARY a
LAUNCH ORJEGHVE,. TO PLACE THE AGENA SATELLITE
WITH PAYLOAD BUA: NEARCPOLAR: ORBIT WAS AGGOMPLISHED i
THE vrs RADAR PLOTBOARD mNDIGATED THE FOLLOWING

| APPROXIMATE: INIEGTION’ CONDITIONS: ‘ALTER, 130 :

sine: Mags: Px REFERENCED VELOCITY, 25080 FPS:

SIGNATURE

tobe

TYPED for. amped) caneAR ‘viTLe,



92:04 SEC.

oo M4574 "BEG"
acre SEG.
150.63 SEC

153,35. SEC,
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

SUSAN K. DOUGHERTY

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 16

- 406 3

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND

JOSEPH P. DOUGHERTY

,

Appellee s

.

________________________________/

Opinion filed May 2, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Brevard County, George Paulk , Judge.

Susan K. Dougherty

, Miami

, pro se

.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Toni C. Bernstein

, Senior Assistant Attorney General,

Tallahassee , for Appellee

, Department of

Revenue

.

Jason M. Gordon, Cocoa Beach, for Appellee

, Joseph P. Dougherty.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

SAWAYA

, PALMER

, and EDWARDS , J

. J., concur.
EXHIBIT 13.2



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

CFO CERTIFICATION



In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report of Almaden
Minerals Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Korm Trieu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





/s/”Korm Trieu”



Name: Korm Trieu

Title: Chief Financial Officer

September 27, 2023
. . “ey , a

WEEKLY DIARY ITEMS - LOIP

lS

3 Apr 59 thru ‘9 Apr 59

(U) Space Technology Laboratories, Inc. (MAZUR)

2. Me Air Force has nade a final fee offer to STL for vork VY :
under contract AF 04(647)-302 (ABLE 3 & 4). The contract will {
be forwarded to the contractor. for signature on or ‘oefore
10 April 1959. Should the. contractor decline to execute the .
documents the parties will be in dispute.

2. Relative to definitization of /c AF 04(647)-309, WDIM .
is presently in process of preparing recommendations dealing
with various issues such es level of effort, funding, and work _
statement. Upon completion, WDIM and LBIP will discuss these
recomendations in preparation for a meeting with STL

establish e definitization schedule. . .

(U) Atlas Missile Display system . (LANE)

Contract AF 64(647)-357 with Douglas Aircraft Company, El Segundo .
Division has been approved and will be forwarded to Douglas immediately.
The resulting contract is a Cost Sharing contract with the Government's
share to be 16.06%. The display was finished on schedule 7 April 1959
and shipped to Las Vegas, Nevada for the International Congress of
Flight beginning Wednesday morning, 8 April 1959.

(U) Missiles Valve Test Services

. The technical evaluation board met.on Thursday and Friday,

26 and 27 March 1959 to evaluate the seven proposals received. The
board's recommendation was to award two contracts to separate
companies. ‘The final evaluation report is being submitted for ©
approval. ’ +

(U) Strategic Lumar BStuty

Qhe three SR 192 contracts (Contract AF 04(647)-333, Aerojet-
General; AF 04(647)-336, Douglas ‘Aircraft’ Santa Monica; and
A¥ 04(647)-3h2, North American Missile Division) have all been‘returned
for, signature and all the exceptions negotiated. Although the
Secretarial Determinations and Findings have not been received, the |
Secretary signed them on the 30th of March, and we intend to process the
contracts on this basis. ‘They will be forwarded for final review
on the 9th of April.



3-9 Ape 1954.
(U) Titan Ducted Launcher Test Progran (LANE) ,

Letter Contract number AF 01:(647)-373 was issued to Aerojet-
‘General, Azusa on 7 April 1959 for this program. It is anticipated
a CPFF definitive contract will be negotiated by the ist of May for
an estimated cost. of approximately $170,000. .

(U) Calibration Standaras Laboratory and Services for Vandenberg AFB

The Calibration Van manufactured by Cook Electric Company under
this contract is due to arrive at Vandenberg Air Force Base on
10 April 1959 which is 5 days behind schedule. ‘the laboratory is
due to be ready for Operation by the 15th of April, and the period
of time between now and then will be spent in calibrating the test
equipment inthe van. Contract AF 04(647)-320. .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000320431
<NAME> CERTIFIED GROCERS OF CALIFORNIA LTD
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-28-1998
<CASH>                                          10,717
<SECURITIES>                                    41,518
<RECEIVABLES>                                  108,168
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,355)
<INVENTORY>                                    129,342
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               256,579
<PP&E>                                         163,516
<DEPRECIATION>                                (87,809)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 410,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          147,425
<BONDS>                                        142,936
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        62,577
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,194
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   410,288  
<SALES>                                        462,141
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               462,141
<CGS>                                          422,980
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  455,229
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,856
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    793
<INCOME-TAX>                                       250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                543
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       543
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2005132EN.01002501.xml

| 28.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 132/25

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 16 March 2005

in Case T-112/03 L'Oréal SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for word mark FLEXI AIR - Earlier word mark FLEX - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Request for proof of genuine use - Article 8(1)(b), Article 8(2)(a)(ii) and Article 43(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2005/C 132/45)

Language of the case: English

In Case T-112/03: L'Oréal SA, established in Paris (France), represented X. Buffet Delmas d'Autane, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: B. Filtenborg, S. Laitinen and G. Schneider), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM having been Revlon (Suisse) SA, established in Schlieren (Switzerland) — action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 January 2003 (Case R 396/2001-4) relating to opposition proceedings between L'Oréal SA and Revlon (Suisse) SA — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and I. Pelikánová, Judges; B. Pastor, Deputy Registrar, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 16 March 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 135 of 7.6.2003.

1

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 3, 2015

No. 04-14-00620-CV

Rosa Obregon PEREZ, Ricardo O. Perez, individually and as next friend of Rosa Elia Perez, 

Maria Perez Jalomus, Juan Jose Perez, Julio Perez, Jr., and Fernando Perez,

Appellants

v.

THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY,

Appellee

From the 83rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 26130

Robert Cadena, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On October 23, 2015, the appellee filed a motion for en banc reconsideration. The Court 

requests that the appellants file a response on or before November 23, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P.

49.2.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of November, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 31.4**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Thomas T. Higgins, certify that:

 

1.I havereviewed this amendment to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Caliper LifeSciences, Inc.;

 

2.Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
|   |   | Date: March 17, 2008                                                                 |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                 |
|   |   | /s/ THOMAS T. HIGGINS                                                                |
|   |   | Thomas T. Higgins                                                                    |
|   |   | Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial  Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Gilbert Hu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
AltiGen Communications, Inc.





Date:
      May 14, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Gilbert HuName:
              Gilbert
      HuTitle:
              Chief
      Executive Officer
#### Phil. Ebert & Sons Company, Respondent, vs. Kergl and wife, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Lines, Spooner & Quarles*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Paul, Ebert & Paul,*attorneys, and *Hernán M. Knoeller,*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS



I, Kenneth W. Brimmer, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Sterion Incorporated;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:

February 13, 2004

/s/  Kenneth W. Brimmer



Kenneth W. Brimmer, Chief Executive Officer
# C_2005045EN.01000501.xml

| 19.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/5

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE

(Fourth Chamber)

of 16 December 2004

in Case C-24/03: Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(EAGGF - Partial annulment of Commission Decision 2002/881/EC - Financial corrections - Fruit and vegetable and public grain storage sector)

(2005/C 45/08)

Language of the case: Italian

In Case C-24/03: Italian Republic (Agent: M. Fiorilli) against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: C. Cattabriga and L. Visaggio) – action for annulment under Article 230 EC, brought on 15 January 2003 – the Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President of the Chamber, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues and K. Schiemann (Rapporteur), Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General, R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 16 December 2004, in which it:

Italian Republic

Commission of the European Communities

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 70 of 22.03.2004.

1

---
March 24, 2015

Mr. Jeffrey Yuhasz

HDV Productions

842 Cranberry Lane

Akron, OH 44313

Dear Mr. Yuhasz:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your February 23, 2015 exemption request on behalf of HDV Productions into the 

public docket (No. FAA-2015-0464), but we are unable to process your request any further. 

The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). 

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9521.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
FDMS Docket No. FAA-2012-0300

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 12/14/11 ---

Regional Airline Association 12/14/11 ---

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 12/14/11 ---

Airlines for America Joe White 12/14/11 ---