T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T H A N N I H TJ O N G J A P, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 73178 A ge nc yN o. A 079- 642- 424 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M a y15, 2012 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , G R A B E R , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. H a nni h T j ong J ap, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of I ndone s i a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng her app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng he rappl i c a t i on f orw i thhol di ng of r e m ova l a nd pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve 

# FI LED MA Y23 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 73178 2 j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w de novo que s t i ons of l a w a nd r e v ie w f o rs u b s tan tia l e v id e n c e f a c tu a l f in d in g s , W

akkaryv. H

older , 558 F . 3d 1 0 4 9 , 1 0 5 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) , a n dw e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . S ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the a ge nc y ’ s de t e rm i na t i on tha tJ ap di d not e x p e r ie n c e h a rm s in I n d o n e s iaa m o u n tin g to p a s t p e r s e c u tio n . Se e i d. a t1059- 60; s e e a l s o Kh o u r a s s a n

yv . I NS , 20 8 F . 3d 10 96 , 11 00 -110 1 (9th C i r. 20 00 ) ( pet i t i on er f a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h pa s tpe r s e c ut i on ba s e d on ha r a s s m e nta nd f or c e d c l os ur e of bu si ness ). S ub st ant i al evi dence al so supp ort s the agency’ s f i nd i ng thatJap fai l ed to e s tab lis h it is m o r e lik e lyth a n n o t s h e w ill b e p e r s e c u te dif r e tu rn e dto I ndone s i a , be c aus e , e ve n a s am e m be rof adi s f a vor e d gr oup, J ap ha s not d e m o n s tr a te dth e r e q u is ite in d iv id u a liz e dr is ko f p e r s e c u tio n . See H

oxha v. A s h c r o ft , 3 1 9 F .3 d1 1 7 9 , 1 1 8 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) ; W a kka ry , 5 5 8 F .3 dat 1 0 6 6 (“[a ]n appl i cantfor w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al w i l l need t o add uce aconsi derabl y l ar ger qua ntum of

i ndi vi dua l i z e d- r i s k e vi de nc e ” ) . F urthe r , J ap ha s note s t abl i s he d a p a tte rn o rp r a c tic e o f

p e r s e c u tio n o f

p e o p le s im ila r lys itu a te dto h e r . See W a kka ry , 5 5 8 F . 3 dat1 0 6 0 -6 2 . A cco rd i n g l y, Jap ’ s w i th h o l d i n g o f rem o v al cl ai m fai l s. S u b st an t i al ev i d en ce al so su p p o rt s th e ag en cy’ s d en i al o f C A T rel i ef b ecau se J ap f a ile dto e s tab lis h it is m o r e lik e lyth a n n o t s h e w ill b e to rtu r e dif r e tu rn e dto I n d o n e s ia . Se e id. a t1067- 68.08- 73178 3 F i nal l y, w e r ej ec tJap’ s c on t ent i on thatthe IJfa i l ed t o con si der the coun try cond i t i on s m at er i al s, because s he has notov er com e the pres um pt i on the agency r e v ie w e dth e r e c o r d . Se e La r i ta -M a r t i n ezv . I

NS , 2 2 0 F .3 d1 0 9 2 , 1 0 9 5 - 9 6 ( 9 th C i r. 20 00 ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.