alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 747/2006

of 17 May 2006         

fixing the rates of the refunds applicable to eggs and egg yolks exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2771/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in eggs (1), and in particular Article 8(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The rates of the refunds applicable to the basic products listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1043/2005 and in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2771/75, and exported in the form of goods listed in Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2771/75, shall be fixed as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 18 May 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 May 2006.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN            

Vice-President

----

(1)OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 49. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

(2)OJ L 172, 5.7.2005, p. 24.

----

ANNEX

Rates of the refunds applicable from 17 May 2006 to eggs and egg yolks exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty

----

(1)  The destinations are as follows:

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                     MICROS SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
               (unaudited - in thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Three months ended
                                                            December 31,
                                                         1996         1995
                                                      -----------   ----------
<S>                                                      <C>         <C>
Weighted-average number of common shares                   7,958       7,882
Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options                  97         133
                                                          ------     --------
Weighted-average number of common and common
equivalent shares outstanding                              8,055       8,015  
                                                          ======     ======== 
Net income (loss)                                         $4,011     $(5,088) 
                                                          ======     ======== 
Net income (loss) per common and common                   $ 0.50     $ (0.63) 
equivalent share                                          ======     ======== 
                
<CAPTION>
                                                          Six months ended
                                                            December 31,
                                                         1996         1995
                                                      -----------   ----------
<S>                                                       <C>        <C>
Weighted-average number of common shares                   7,952       7,872
Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options                  45         126
                                                          ------     ---------
Weighted-average number of common and common               7,997       7,998  
equivalent shares outstanding                             ======     =========
                             
Net income (loss)                                         $6,338     $ (1,834)
                                                          ======     =========
Net income (loss) per common and common                   $ 0.79     $  (0.23)
equivalent share                                          ======     =========

</TABLE>





                                       21
¥ftn· ~lf"'Al"'-P¥ 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114740 

yli NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, O.C. 

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR 

2 4 NOV 1969 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 

SUBJECT: Studies of Reconnaissance Projects 

We have agreed to conduct jointly several studies 

relating to reconnaissance problems and projects. These 

studies are to address the following questions: 

1. What is the value of systems with higher reso• 

lution than our present capabilities? This study has been 

completed under the direction of a study group chaired by 

I I 

2. What technological capabilities exist or may 

reasonably be expected in the near future to permit the 

development of~----------------~? What are 

the comparative merits of competing technologies toward 

BYEMAN 

achieving this capability? What performance milestones 

should we expect in the next 18 months? This study 'has been 

established under Dr. Fubini and a report is expected in the 

spring of 1970. 

3. What are the naed, value, risks, and command 

and control problems associated with vulnerable peripheral 

SIGINT collection systems and what alternatives exist? This 

study is being conducted by~----~and will probably be 

completed by the ~nd of this year. 

4. What are the possibilities for developing an 

ocean surveillance system; how would it interface with other 

surveillance systems? This question will be addressed as 

part of a comprehensive Defense Science Board study of ocean 

surveilldnce. This report should be completed in ear:y 1970. 

BYEMAN TOP SECRET £XCLU0£0' noM •ur_o1111Anc AEGJtA01N¥ 

OQb OIIUC.f!V( tJ00.10 00£:S: HQi A$'Pl¥ 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114740 
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114740 

IUf" v ... v&~ ... l 

5. How should we allocate resources among. 

satellite-borne, airborne, and surface-based ELINT collec• 

tion systems? We are establishing a study group now and 

formulating detailed terms of reference. 

We agree that these questions are important and that 

the intelligence community can benefit by the results of 

these studies. The NRO and DDR&E staffs will cooperate 

in conducting the studies. The results of the studies will 

be used by both organizations in accordance with their 

respective responsibilities and authority. 

BYEMAN 

3YEMAN 

C◊t.r'rAOt S:.YSTl!M 

10P SECRET cxcL'-'OlD ,.o,.. •wro11r11nc 11uoaa01111c 

ooo 011:u.:cnve ,zoo,H> oon wQf(IIIPPlV 

~-COPIU 

____ 2cc......._ PAGtS 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05114740
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03201]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER15-1016-000]


Shafter Solar, LLC; Supplemental Notice that Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of Shafter Solar, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such application 
includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is March 2, 2015.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#82c4c7d0c1cdeceeebece7d1f7f2f2edf0f6c2e4e7f0e1ace5edf4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1d5b584f5e5273717473784e686d6d726f695d7b786f7e337a726b">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: February 10, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-03201 Filed 2-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
San loaqu¡n Valley I7

AIR PflTLUTIflI{ C(lIITRflL DISTRICT HEALTHY AIR LIVING"

May 12,2015

Mr. Richard Corey

Executive Officer

California Air Resources Board

1001 "1" Street

P.O. Box 2815

Sacramento, CA 95812

Dear Mr. Corey:

Enclosed is the State lmplementation Plan (SlP) Package for the San Joaquin

Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (District) 2015 Plan for the 1997

PM2.5 Standard (2015 PM2.5 Plan). The District Governing Board adopted the

2015 PM2.5 Plan at a public hearing held on April 1 6,2015. We request that the

California Air Resources Board (ARB) transmit this plan and the appropriate

documentation to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a

SIP revision.

lncluded in this SIP Package are the following attachments:

1. ARB SIP Completeness Checklist

2. The 2015 PM2.5 Plan with Appendices

3. Governing Board Resolution Adopting the 2015 PM2.5 Plan and Requesting

Extension of Valley Serious Area Attainment Deadline for the 1997 PM2.5

Standard

4. Governing Board Resolution for Use of AB 2522 DMV Fees to Meet Federal

Clean Air Act Mandates

5. Governing Board Memo

6. Evidence of Public Hearing

lf you have any questions regarding this plan, please contact Chelsea Gonzales

at Chelsea.Gonzales@vallevair.orq at (559) 230-5800. The District thanks you

and your staff for your assistance and collaboration during the preparation of this

2015 PM2.5 Plan.

Sheraz

Director of Strategies and Incentives

Attachments

cc: S. Vanderspek
vnyee

WEEKLY DIARY ITEMS - Lazsa
7 Jemary Thru 13 Jamary 1960

(U) Letter contract ar Oh(647)-449, Aeromutronies. Syatens, Inc., Program 609A

The definitive contract vill be forwarded for Initial Review 14 January 1960,
An. amendment to the letter contract is being Prepared which will add $300,000

(U) letter Contract AF 04(647)-476, General Electric .
Commmication Batellite Program



WEEKLY DIARY TreMs - Ingar
7 January Thru 13 an 1960” .

(U) Douglas Aircratt Company, Inc.

1. (U) Negotiations with DAC under Contract AF 0M 645)-65 concerning Figure "A"
GSE items were suspended pending the Contractor's review and analysis of the Air.
Force counter-offer to their Proposed settlement cost for the effort involved,

the completion date of the effort at AFMIC was revised after submission of the
Contractor's proposal, the negotiations attempted to reconcile this effect; however,
in so doing, an impasse was reached relative to the engineering effort; therefore,
negotiations were suspended until 15 January 1960, at which time additional informe~
tion vill be presented to permit completion of the negotiations. ‘The Contractor is
performing under-a Letter Contract and this delay in negotiations will not affect
production.

2. (U) Letter Contract aF 04(647)-481 for the systems Engineering and Technical
Be of the WS 115A Program is being processed for transfer to SBAMA effective
January 1960. : .

3. (U) Letter Contract AF 04(647)-527 Covering the DISCOVERER Launch Support

effort at Vandenberg AFB bas been returned conditionally signed by the Contractor.

The contractual instrument is being revised to resolve the conditions. No problem

is Sanaa) 1960 in accomplishing review and distribution of the document on or about
January e .

(U)" Long Bange RAD Valve Program.

Disposition of the 5500 gallon capacity LOX storage tank supplied as GIP to
Telecomputing Corporation, Whittaker Controls Division, is creating a.problem. ‘he
Contractor Wishes to buy the tank which is an integral part of their test facilities.
This facility is used as a BAA subcontractor for valve testing the X-15. ‘The tank
Yas supplied as GFP under Contract AF Ob(647)-162 which is in process of temnination.
The Contractor and the Termination Contracting Officer, LAAPD, have been advised that
the Air Force has a continuing need for the tank. As & result, a meeting was held at
EMC by representatives of the Contractor and Air Force persounel to dlecese a solu-—
tion to the problem. 4n Air Force tean visited the Contractor's facility to observe

the site of tank emplacement. Recomendations are that the tank should be retained

IBZSP will procure an additional Quantity of 41 telemetry systems from United
ElectroDynamics, Inc.,(UED). These telemetry systems are for the Series "E" and
Series "D" ATIAS. A prototype system for the Series "E" ATIAS will be required to be
developed.and tested since this system differs from the.proven Series "D". In addai-
tion, spare parts, technical manuals and engineering drawings will be procured for
SBAMA for their quantity of 25 of the Series "ER" system.
No. 04-14-00288-CR

IN THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

AT SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

RICARDO ROGER MORALES

Defendant

vs.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

Plaintiff- Appellee'""' ro

On Appeal from the 25th District Court

of Guadalupe County, Texas

Hon. William D. Old, III Presiding

Trial Court Cause No. 13-1384-CR-A

APPELLANT'S PRO SE MOTION

FOR ACCESS TO APPELLATE RECORD

TO THE HONORABLE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS:

Appellant Ricardo Roger Morales' court-appointed attorney has filed

Appellant's Brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Appellant asks this court to provide him access to the appellate record so

that he may review the record in drafting his pro se brief explaining what

issues he thinks may be raised in this appeal.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, appellant RICARDO

ROGER MORALES prays that after review of this motion and any response

filed by the State of Texas, this court grant this motion and grant Mr.

Morales pro se access to the appellate record in this appeal.

Respectfully submitted,

Ricardo Roger Morales, Appellant

TDCJ# 1922160

Michael Unit

2664 FM 2054

Tennessee Colony, Texas 75886

Certificate of Service

hereby certify that true copy of this document was served by first

class U.S. mail upon the 25"1 Judicial District Attorney's Office, 211 W.

Court Street, Suite 260, Seguin, Texas 78155 on December J2_, 20'4-

Certification of Compliance

According to the WordPerfect program used to create this document,

there are 237 words in this document.
,0
S



6. mee security factor of your participation in the ARS
will . Particularly high security sensitivi-
*y is associated vith the ARS as « national since
compromise or premature of this endeavor could result in seri-
Cus national embarrassment and subsequent loss in the operaticn-
the very Past tine Taian, end the resulting = e rx ne,
‘the very fect that the USAP @n spproved satelii: Progren
iteelt, classified as SECKET inforassion” ,
/s/ 0. 3. Ritiena
oO. J.
Colonel, UhAP
Commander
AW 12
aes 4 :
' 10
2 WIR 56-124
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-03-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-04-1997
<CASH>                                       4,578,000
<SECURITIES>                                15,606,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,628,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 18,428,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            42,212,000
<PP&E>                                       3,610,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,400,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,789,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,747,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       101,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,386,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                44,789,000
<SALES>                                     23,742,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,742,000
<CGS>                                       18,290,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,290,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,792,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,943,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   762,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,146,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,146,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
FIRST
      M
& F CORPORATION





**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATIONS**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of First M&F Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hugh S.
      Potts, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of
      my
      knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:





A.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





B.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Date:  May
      9,
      2008




/s/
                Hugh S. Potts, Jr.Hugh
                S. Potts, Jr.Chairman
                and Chief Executive Officer
or_ 

-01 No 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 AUGUST 2015 

AMMORANDIIM FOR DEPUTY RC TOR ORICSIZA CIA 

SUBJECT: Modification aL N ukase 

Refarence is meads to your 8C-162911-32 dated 

The modified packep resealed is planed for 

In lunar/ SSG & Apprepriats working 1* *I 

Ms. muss, UMW, and NSA is onsonsepd. 

ON L. MARTIN, M. 

Colonial USAF 

DisatOr, Vie of 

3Sseik Walton* 

Distribution 

1 Addressee 

2 EtA FRS Die 

3 SA PUS filo 

4 Col Martin file 

5 SAMS 

Handle viaControl. . Srtea 

TOP SECRET. 
czi 

eza 

rCh 

tO 

*

Ul 

ta. 

-4 

tx. 

CZ) 4-3 

C.) < 

C.) X 

< 0 < 

C.) 

t.f) •Cit 

Lx.. 

ct. 

 0 Ico (r) C■1 

iJ 

IJ 

ogr 

< 

0 0 01C 0 0 01 

.?1):

E-0) 1'4 

• A- gx,) 

" MI 1-4 It tacj 

b•". 123 

Z Ck- 

/-* 

*Cr 

Z r 

0 0 

0 .P-4 4t tat) Z 

C.) Ch Ix. 1+4 to-I La] 

01/411-4 s"-• (f) 

f-4 

14 42/ I 

fal 

Ci-ZZMCCI:3

0- 

C) < <11 to 

C5 _04 CI • Cf) 

fx.1 0 X it 

> fv.' • to 

C\1 

".-4 2', St ix 

0 

fx-1 C.) Gx.) 

et) 

tr) < 

th C4 r.r.4 Cr: 

tir.1 > 

*-4 jal 0 r_.) 

fr4 0 cc, z 

Cc 0 ts.) 

• *-4 IL C.) Ze, 

›- 

P-4 

0 0 

< z. 

• C) 

1-• 

)-4 

,43 Z IX, 

c,:xf. 0- 

Z (x) 0 74 Z 

1-.4 0-4 > 4.1 < 

0.4 41le CI 0 EZ) 

cc z < 40 co 

0 0 

6-4 •-• 

Ls. c.) •-• 31k 

t\1 

0 

CO 

Q 

0 

Zn 

t4) 

C..) 

C. 

QF 

0 c\J 

>c 

w 

o 

(r) 

0 < 

< 

it144 7.1j 

HZ.-.13ERT SCOVILLE,IJr. 

LiDeputy Director 

(Research) 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 AUGUST 2015 

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25, D.C. 

SC-10296-62 

Copy 

5 October 1962 

MEMGaANDUM FOR: Director, National Reconnaissance Office 

SUBJECT: Modification of Next TAM Package 

1. It is requested that the next TAKI package be modified 

in a like manner to that of TAM II which was launched on 29 April 

1962. This modification consists of limiting the TAM coverage 

to the TALL KING frequency, thus making it a specific instrument 

for sampling the TALL KING environment. 

2. If there are any technical questions, Harold Willis of 

my staff, extension 6941, will be glad to discuss them with your 

representatives. 

HANDLE IA CC;, CH/ -.NHS ONLY
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7177** 

MICHAEL A. GADDY , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. HAROLD REEP , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Frank D. Whitney , Chief District Judge. ( 3:16

- cv - 00045

- FDW )

Submitted : January 31, 2017 Decided: February 9, 2017

Before DUNCAN and KEENAN, Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Michael A. Gaddy , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael A. Gaddy seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitution al right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is deb atable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling i s debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gaddy has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid t he decisional process.
DISMISSED