alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DOWNGRADED. AT • 3 YEAR INTERVALS;

DECLASSIFIED AFTER 12 YEARS.

DOD DIR 5200.10

11 INN Ili

DEPARTMENT . OF THE AIR FORCE ..

HEADQUARTERS UNIT= STATES MR FORCE

WASHINGTON 25. D. C.

MAY 8 1959

DISCO/IRITICE Progravt Funding

Clammier

Air Force Ballistic Missile Division

AV Unit Poet Office

Los Angeles 45, California

1. • Reference is to4our 25 February 1959 letters subject

as above,- eh.i.ch- discuseed the Preient . fundLing for the IlointArgue.Us

laurrober- and the Vandenberg Missile AsseitbIo r Building. .

2. I recegnise yoUr cOncern„vith respectto baring more intimate

control: of .prograns through covelete oinerihip of the'itailities..

Rawerwer, 79U ']ate, the ABPA:•epialificiallY received. Congressional

autheriimtiOn . 104 fundri"for these facilities.

, • 2 -

3; X001 that in actual' operations the Air- Force through its .

relati onship with AB in the sPaee programs,

aatioti: of . these facilitiss for projects•vhich you' office is sponsoring

tinder' the ofignisince of .tie ABS.; Tt also a known tact that

regardless of the-funds used to • icotnire the facilities that at such

the its ABM ' has no further lure these facilities they become the

property of::the Air Puree ands 

4;,,. Based on the above, I do not teel that any action should

be taken to change the firma:4as of these facilities.

TOt
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.41


                               FOURTH AMENDMENT TO
                   THE SUBSCRIPTION AND PUT AND CALL AGREEMENT
                    WITH RESPECT TO SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF
                   WESTERN WIRELESS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION


        This Fourth Amendment to the Subscription and Put and Call Agreement
with respect to Shares of Common Stock of Western Wireless International
Corporation, as amended (the "Horwitz Agreement"), is made as of the 31st day of
March, 2001, by and between Bradley J. Horwitz ("Horwitz"), Western Wireless
International Corporation ("WWIC"), Western Wireless Corporation ("WWC"), and
WWC Holding Co., Inc. ("Holding Co.") (WWC and Holding Co. are collectively
referred to as "Western," and together with Horwitz and WWIC, collectively, the
"Parties").

                                   WITNESSETH:

        WHEREAS, Horwitz and Western have each determined that it is in their
best interests to extend to April 30, 2001 the period during which Horwitz shall
have the right, but not the obligation, to require Holding Co. to exchange all
of his shares of WWIC for that number of shares of WWC equal to the Call
Consideration (as defined in the Horwitz Agreement);

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants
contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree that Paragraph 8
of the Horwitz Agreement is amended to read as follows:

                During the period from January 1, 2001  through  April
                30, 2001,  Horwitz  shall have the right,  but not the
                obligation,  to require  Holding Co. to exchange  all,
                but not less than all,  of the Shares for that  number
                of  shares  of WWC  Common  Stock  equal  to the  Call
                Consideration.

        Except as amended herein, the terms of the Horwitz Agreement shall
remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been duly executed on the day and
year first written above.



WESTERN WIRELESS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION      WESTERN WIRELESS CORPORATION

By: /s/ John W. Stanton                         By: /s/ John W. Stanton
    -------------------------------                 ---------------------------
        John W. Stanton                                 John W. Stanton
        Chairman and                                    Chairman and
        Chief Executive Officer                         Chief Executive Officer

BRADLEY J. HORWITZ                              WWC HOLDING CO., INC.

/s/ Bradley J. Horwitz                          By:  /s/ John W. Stanton
-----------------------------------                ----------------------------
                                                         John W. Stanton
                                                         Chairman and Chief
                                                         Executive Officer
Approved for Release: 2019/05/21 C05108385 HANDl E Vl!~ 

BYEMAN 

/ATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D .C. 

THE NRO STAFF 

16 February 1968 

MEMORANDUM FOR GENE 

SUBJECT: Briefing of Maj Gen John A. Goshorn, Director DCAS 

On 15 February, in the company of Mr. Boenning, of this 

staff and Colonel Benjamin Marshall, Chief Security Officer 

of DCAS, I met with Maj Gen John A. Goshorn, the Director of 

DCAS. I found General Goshorn to be extremely responsive to 

a brief indoctrination into the organization and mission of 

the National Reconnaissance Office and to specific briefing 

related to projects CORONA, EARPOP, GAMBIT, and DORIAN. He 

had previously been entertained at CIA by Mr. Carl Duckett 

in October 1967, at which time he had been briefed into projects IDEALIST and OXCART. 

Following the indoctrination we discussed the problem 

related to the requirement for overtime and travel on the 

part of two DCAS quality assurance inspectors involved in the 

STRAWMAN program at AIL, which is discussed in the attached 

message. General Goshorn responded by authorizing an additional $10,000 to cover costs related to this requirement 

through 1 July and directed the area DCAS quality assur'ance 

director to program for FY 69 funds using the experience 

derived from work actually performed through 1 July. He saw 

no requirement to brief additional DCAS personnel for the 

various interfaces that our two organizations experience. He 

did ask that we alert him through Colonel Marshall of "hard 

money" (travel-overtime) requirements as far in advance as 

possible for budget planning purposes. 

I have relayed the aforegoing to Col Bumm. Col Bumm 

suggested that there might be some areas of NRO-DCAS interface which might work smoother if some of the DCAS area 

directors were also briefed. However, he agreed with my 

suggestion that while we could be examining the DCAS nationwide organization with this possible objective in mind, that 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

HANDLE VIA CONTROL NO INTERNAL yC>.l 

~~~ ::::==::1==::==-2"",--___ cpo:~:: BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

Approved for Release: 2019/05/21 C05108385 
Approved for Release: 2019/05/21 C05108385 HANDLE VIA 

lOP SECRET BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

we might better wait and see how things progressed under 

the present arrangement, and that we should take no unilateral action without consulting first with General Goshorn. 

Atch 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

NRO 

As i~curitY aff 

-

EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

DOD DIRECTIVE 5200,10 DOES NOT APPLY 

-

Approved for Release: 2019/05/21 C05108385 

CONTROL NO INTERNAL 

COPY ___ OF ___ COPIES 

P AG E_--",,2_ 0 F_ --,,2,,--_ PA G E 5
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8368-8369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03319]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Notice of March 11, 2015 Public Hearing

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Wednesday, March 11, 2015.

PLACE: Offices of the Corporation, Twelfth Floor Board Room, 1100 New 
York Avenue NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: Hearing OPEN to the Public at 2:00 p.m.

PURPOSE: Public Hearing in conjunction with each meeting of OPIC's 
Board of Directors, to afford an opportunity for any person to present 
views regarding the activities of the Corporation.

PROCEDURES: Individuals wishing to address the hearing orally must 
provide advance notice to OPIC's Corporate Secretary no later than 5 
p.m. Thursday, March 5, 2015. The notice must include the individual's 
name, title, organization, address, and telephone number, and a concise 
summary of the subject matter to be presented.
    Oral presentations may not exceed ten (10) minutes. The time for 
individual presentations may be reduced proportionately, if necessary, 
to afford all participants who have submitted a timely request an 
opportunity to be heard.
    Participants wishing to submit a written statement for the record 
must submit a copy of such statement to OPIC's Corporate Secretary no 
later than 5 p.m. Thursday, March 5, 2015. Such statement must be 
typewritten, double spaced, and may not exceed twenty-five (25) pages.
    Upon receipt of the required notice, OPIC will prepare an agenda, 
which will be available at the hearing, that identifies speakers, the 
subject on which each participant will speak, and the time allotted for 
each presentation.
    A written summary of the hearing will be compiled, and such summary 
will be made available, upon written request to OPIC's Corporate 
Secretary, at the cost of reproduction.
    The March 19, 2015 Board meeting agenda is anticipated to include a 
report from the President and CEO, the approval of the minutes of the 
December 2014 Board meeting, and the approval of various management 
reports.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Information on the hearing may be 
obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438, via facsimile at (202) 
408-0297, or via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ac9e5e4e4e3efa4cee5fde4f9cae5fae3e9a4ede5fc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9fdcf0f1f1f6fab1dbf0e8f1ecdff0eff6fcb1f8f0e9">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 8369]]


    Dated: February 13, 2015.
Connie M. Downs,
OPIC Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-03319 Filed 2-12-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Champion Mortgage Co., Inc., Respondent, v Winford Elmore, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[772 NYS2d 505]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered February 7, 2003, which, in this mortgage foreclosure action, granted the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment foreclosing on the mortgage and striking defendant’s affirmative defenses, and referred the matter to a referee to compute all amounts due to plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment foreclosing on the mortgage based upon defendant’s failure to make the required monthly payments. Defendant’s affirmative defense of fraud, predicated upon oral representations at odds with the plain and unambiguous terms of the note and the payment reduction provision subsequently signed by him, was properly struck *(see Mariani v Dyer,*193 AD2d 456, 457 [1993], *lv denied*82 NY2d 658 [1993]; *Humble Oil & Ref. Co. v Jaybert Esso Serv. Sta.,*30 AD2d 952 [1968]).

*141We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan and Lerner, JJ.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 136 

To amend chapter 21 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that fathers 

of certain permanently disabled or deceased veterans shall be included 

with mothers of such veterans as preference eligibles for treatment in 

the civil service. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 8, 2015 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 21 of title 5, United States Code, to 

provide that fathers of certain permanently disabled or 

deceased veterans shall be included with mothers of such 

veterans as preference eligibles for treatment in the civil 

service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gold Star Fathers Act 

5 of 2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 136 IS

1 SEC. 2. PREFERENCE ELIGIBLE TREATMENT FOR FATHERS 

2 OF CERTAIN PERMANENTLY DISABLED OR 

3 DECEASED VETERANS. 

4 Section 2108(3) of title 5, United States Code, is 

5 amended by striking subparagraphs (F) and (G) and in6 serting the following: 

7 ‘‘(F) the parent of an individual who lost 

8 his or her life under honorable conditions while 

9 serving in the armed forces during a period 

10 named by paragraph (1)(A) of this section, if— 

11 ‘‘(i) the spouse of that parent is to12 tally and permanently disabled; or 

13 ‘‘(ii) that parent, when preference is 

14 claimed, is unmarried or, if married, le15 gally separated from his or her spouse; 

16 ‘‘(G) the parent of a service-connected per17 manently and totally disabled veteran, if— 

18 ‘‘(i) the spouse of that parent is to19 tally and permanently disabled; or 

20 ‘‘(ii) that parent, when preference is 

21 claimed, is unmarried or, if married, le22 gally separated from his or her spouse; 

23 and’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 136 IS

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

2 The amendment made by this Act shall take effect 

3 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
This appeal was originally submitted to a panel consisting of Justice Federico G. Hinojosa, whose 1

term of office expired on December 31, 2006, Justice Nelda V. Rodriguez, and Senior Justice John Hill,

assigned to this Court by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. §

74.003 (Vernon 2005). The matter is now being submitted to the current panel in accordance with the Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.1(a),(c).

NUMBER 13-99-556-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE

OF CLYNE EDWARD MEINEN, DECEASED

___________________________________________________________ 

On appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

_____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza1

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Lee Meinen, and appellee, Jean Corbin, the administrator/executrix of

the Estate of Clyne Edward Meinen, have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. See
2

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). According to the motion, the parties “have fully and finally

compromised and settled” all matters in controversy between them. 

This Court previously issued an opinion and judgment in this cause on March 1,

2001. The appeal remained pending in this Court, however, based on motions for

rehearing and a motion to stay all proceedings on appeal pending settlement. 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the joint

motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. Accordingly, we

withdraw the opinion and judgment of March 1, 2001, and substitute this opinion and

judgment in their place. See id. 42.1(c). 

The joint motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this appeal is DISMISSED. See id.

42.1(a)(1), 43.2(e). All other pending motions are DISMISSED AS MOOT. Costs are

assessed against appellant. Id. 42.1(d). 

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 

filed this the 6th day of March, 2008.
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	NRO participates in 37th SmallSat Conference
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/135/transparent.png?ver=B2YYtOxzg52QYDIqGLCDCQ%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">NRO participates in 37th SmallSat Conference</h1>
    </div>
    
<div id="adetail-slick-gallery" class="gallery">
    
    <div class="item">
        
        <div class="image">
            
            <img src="https://media.defense.gov/2023/Aug/21/2003284507/1920/1080/0/720801-F-RQ659-0029.PNG"
                 class="aimage img-responsive"
                 alt="NRO logo- smaller"
                 itemprop="image" />
        </div>
        
        
        
        
        
        <div class="slide-info-hidden">
            <div class="slide-info-inner">
            
            <div class="image-title">NRO logo</div>
            <div class="image-caption">image of NRO logo</div>
        </div>
    </div>
    </div>

    
</div>
<div class="slide-info"></div>





    <div> <span class="date">/ Published Sept. 8, 2023</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text"></span>
    <p>NRO PARTICIPATES IN 37TH SMALLSAT CONFERENCE<br />
See Press Release </p>
<br />
</div>

    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
[No. 25137.

Department Two.

July 6, 1934.]

#### Bernard Isings, *Appellant,*v. A. Cugini, *Respondent.**1*

*Shank, Belt & Rode,*for appellant.

*Ballinger, Hutson & Boldt,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 34 P. (2d) 359.

Tolman, J.

Appellant, as plaintiff, sued for damages to his automobile truck caused by a collision with a similar truck owned by the defendant, alleging that the defendant’s truck was negligently operated, thus causing the collision.

The defendant denied negligence and cross-complained, alleging that the collision was caused by the negligent operation of the plaintiff’s truck. The cause was tried to the court, sitting without a jury, resulting in findings of fact to the effect that both drivers w'ere negligent and the conclusion that neither party was entitled to recover from the other. A judgment followed dismissing both the plaintiff’s action and the defendant’s counterclaim, with prejudice. The plaintiff only has appealed.

Nothing but questions of fact are here presented, upon which the trial court made full and complete findings. Therefore, we have only to determine whether the evidence preponderates against any material fact so found. This has necessitated a careful study of the entire record and the weighing of the testimony in the light of all the surrounding circumstances, tested by the deductions and conclusions presented by the appellant in his brief and oral argument.

After a careful study we are clearly convinced that the trial court correctly found the facts, that the evidence does not preponderate against any material finding, and that a correct result was reached. A discussion of the testimony would be of no practical benefit to the parties, or to the bench and bar, and in the interests of economy we omit details.

The judgment is affirmed.

Beals, C. J., Holcomb, Blake, and Geraghty, JJ., concur.
99-982.

#### State ex rel. Sovchik v. Cloverleaf Local School Bd. of Edn.

Medina App. No. 2959-M. On motion to expedite appeal. Motion denied.

Lundberg Stratton, J., denies the motion as moot.
**Exhibit 21.1**

**List of Subsidiary Companies**

Channel Services S.A., a Swiss company 

Chuanmei Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., a PRC wholly-owned foreign enterprise 

Collaborative Content LLC, a Maryland limited liability company 

CNET Investments, Inc., a Delaware company 

CNET Korea Inc., a Korean company 

CNET Marketplaces, Inc. a Delaware company 

CNET Networks Asia Pacific Pte Ltd, a Singapore company 

CNET Networks Australia Pty Ltd., an Australian company 

CNET Networks Deutschland GmbH, a German company 

CNET Networks (France) SAS, a French company 

CNET Networks Japan KK, a Japanese company 

CNET Networks Korea Inc., a Korean company 

CNET Networks UK Limited, a United Kingdomcompany 

CNET Subsidiary BC, Inc., a British Columbia [Canada] company 

dFactory SARL, a Swiss company 

ExactChoice Corporation, a California company 

INET Centric Finance Inc., a Delawarecompany 

Orange Ball Networks Subsidiary PRC, Inc., a Delaware company 

PC Home Cayman Ltd, a Cayman Islands company 

Twofold Photos, Inc., a California company 

ZD (Tianjin) Computer Information Technology Co., Ltd., a Chinese company
EXHIBIT 32.2

# Certificate of Chief
Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 dated August 1, 2003

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer CNET
Networks, Inc. (CNET) hereby certifies that:

| | 1. | the Annual Report on Form 10-Q of CNET for the annual period ended December 31,
               2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 27, 2004
               (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
               15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CNET.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Dated:   February 27, 2004 /S/ Douglas N. Woodrum
Douglas N. WoodrumExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to CNET and will be
retained by CNET and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
BARC GRIPYISS AFB N.Y.
CORCEAC OFFUTT AFD NEAR
STC RAEDOLSS AFB TEXAS
3908 ASW OFFUTT arn NEER
let MEGSILS DIV VANDRNBERS AFB CALIF
‘SECRET FROM AFCIN-ZB. REFERENCE AFEUD MESSAGER
WDES0-0-1-E, 2 SEP 58. TEE 6504TH BPG/ARBC Is

TILGS

IN PROGRAMIING DURING DEVELOPERS. TREREFORE, THIS
SQUADSON SHOCLD BE TRAINED AND EMPLOTED AS NESIEED

stn ao)
BY S4C. AT OFFUTT ars. CY AaTS
oa ed
deed -: 1see
AFCIE-33 pp of 10 J3 20 Lok.

Maj Giraud yeceinen 7 ne te
74187 1 1 fey foe samgs



oa PGE na ae
7u~-—_
: mw ~
= mi and amy other Sdealtying dats. Changes ix the deeeition

(odditens,

AY OD TLIO, men, rey 1 o,5 ty M3