alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NUMBER 13-12-00453-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

LARRY WHATLEY, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 213th District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Garza

A jury found appellant, Larry Whatley, guilty of aggravated assault with a deadly 

weapon, repeat offender, a second-degree felony. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. §

22.02(a)(2), (b) (West 2011). Appellant pleaded “true” to an enhancement paragraph, 

and the trial court sentenced him to twenty-five years’ imprisonment. By a single issue, 

appellant contends the trial court violated his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation by 
2

improperly limiting the scope of his cross-examination of a witness. See U.S. CONST.

amend. VI. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND1

Appellant was convicted of violently assaulting Brooke Butler, his live-in girlfriend. 

After the assault, Butler went to the home of her friend, Mandi Moore, who called 911 to 

request treatment of Butler’s injuries. At trial, Moore testified for the State. On crossexamination, defense counsel asked Moore if Butler was involved with anyone else at 

the time of the assault. The prosecutor objected on relevance grounds. Outside the 

presence of the jury, defense counsel was permitted to ask Moore whether Butler was 

involved in any other relationships at the time of the assault. Moore answered that she 

did not know. The prosecutor said that the question was “a fishing expedition” and 

improper character evidence. The trial court sustained the State’s objection. The jury 

returned; defense counsel stated he had no other questions, and Moore was dismissed.

II. DISCUSSION 

The State argues that appellant failed to preserve his issue for review. We 

agree. 

To preserve a complaint for appellate review, the record must show that a 

specific and timely complaint was made to the trial judge and that the trial judge ruled 

on the complaint. TEX. R. APP. P. 33.1; see Lovill v. State, 319 S.W.3d 687, 691 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2009). It is well established that even constitutional and statutory rights may 

be waived by failure to object. Wright v. State, 28 S.W.3d 526, 536 (Tex. Crim. App.

 

1

This case is before the Court on transfer from the Second Court of Appeals in Fort Worth, Texas 

pursuant to an order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 

2005). 
3

2000) (“Because he did not object to error under the Confrontation Clause, appellant

waives this argument on appeal”). 

By failing to object to the trial court’s ruling, appellant failed to preserve any error. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 33.1; Lovill, 319 S.W.3d at 691; Wright, 28 S.W.3d at 536. We 

overrule appellant’s sole issue.

III. CONCLUSION

We affirm the trial court’s judgment. 

________________________

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

Justice

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

15th day of August, 2013.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,443,839
<SECURITIES>                                 6,443,559
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,396
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    337,754
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,297,377
<PP&E>                                       2,449,974
<DEPRECIATION>                                 167,101
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,713,030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,297,377
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        77,384
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,939,191
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,713,030
<SALES>                                          7,580
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               832,699
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,726,908
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,916
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,150,325)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (4,150,325)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,150,325)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.54)



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0206 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KATHAN DEVERNON JOHNSON,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 11 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 5 2023

07/05/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0206
#### Liebman, Appellant, vs. Welsh, Respondent.

*January 13*—

February *9, 1915.*

*Negligence: Collision between motorcycle and vehicle.*

In an action for injuries sustained in a collision between plaintiff’s motorcycle and defendant’s vehicle, a finding of the circuit court acquitting defendant of negligence is *held*not to be against the' preponderance of the evidence.

Appeal from a judgment of the pircuit court for Brown county: S. D. HastiNgs, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages from the defendant for personal injuries and damage to his clothing *598and motorcycle, alleged to have been sustained as a result of a collision with a vehicle driven by the defendant. The complaint alleged that oh October 17, 1912, plaintiff was riding a motorcycle in an easterly direction on Main street in the city of Green Bay; that the defendant was driving a horse and carriage in the same direction, a short distance in front of the plaintiff; that as defendant approached the corner of Monroe avenue and Main street he turned his horse suddenly to the left to go north on Monroe avenue; that plaintiff . was about to pass to the left of the defendant, and that owing to the sudden turn to the north his motorcycle collided with the carriage, throwing him to the pavement; that the collision was the result of the defendant’s negligence in turning the corner before reaching the easterly side of Monroe avenue, in violation of an ordinance of the city of Green Bay providing that a vehicle turning to the left into another street shall pass to the right of the road and beyond the center of the street intersection before turning. By his answer the defendant denied the allegations of the complaint charging him with responsibility for the accident, and alleged negligence on the part of the plaintiff, in that he was running his motorcycle at an excessive and dangerous rate of speed, in violation of the city ordinance. The action was commenced in justice’s court, where plaintiff recovered damages to the amoimt of $17.50. An appeal was taken to the circuit court, where, by agreement of the parties, the case was tried *de novo*on the record from the justice’s court. The circuit court found that the evidence failed to show negligence on the part of the defendant and ordered judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered in accordance with such direction.

*A. McComb,*for the appellant.

For the respondent there was a brief by Greene, *Fairchild,*North, *Parker &■ McGillan,*and oral argument by *John W. Gauerhe,*

*599Barnes, J.

The finding of the circuit court acquitting the defendant of negligence is not against the preponderance (much less the clear preponderance) of the evidence, and the judgment must therefore he affirmed.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32






CERTIFICATION




By signing below, each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge, (i) this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of River Valley Bancorp.




Signed this 16th day of March, 2011.




/s/ Matthew P. Forrester

/s/ Vickie L. GrimesMatthew P. Forrester

Vickie L. GrimesPresident and Chief Executive Officer

Vice President of Finance







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to River Valley Bancorp and will be retained by River Valley Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PLAINS
RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 2000
AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          17,626
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  525,612
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     59,649
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               602,887
<PP&E>                                       1,206,445
<DEPRECIATION>                                 410,591
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,504,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          542,115
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          138,813
<PREFERRED>                                     23,300
<COMMON>                                         1,795
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,163
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,504,065
<SALES>                                        986,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,039,941
<CGS>                                          932,980
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  959,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,874
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,210
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,732
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,478
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,365)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,113
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.68



</TABLE>
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1238 

To provide for an accounting of total United States contributions to the 

United Nations. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2015 

Mr. LEE (for himself, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. COTTON, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. CRAPO, 

Mr. CRUZ, Mr. DAINES, Mr. ENZI, Mr. HATCH, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. KIRK, Mr. PERDUE, Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SASSE, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. 

THUNE, Mr. VITTER, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. RISCH, Mr. SCOTT, Mr. 

WICKER, and Ms. AYOTTE) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To provide for an accounting of total United States 

contributions to the United Nations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Annual Report on 

5 United States Contributions to the United Nations Act’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1238 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPORT ON UNITED STATES CONTRIBUTIONS TO 

2 THE UNITED NATIONS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the 

4 date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, 

5 the Director of the Office of Management and Budget 

6 shall submit to Congress a report on all assessed and vol7 untary contributions, including in-kind, of the United 

8 States Government to the United Nations and its affili9 ated agencies and related bodies during the previous fiscal 

10 year. 

11 (b) CONTENT.—The report required under subsection 

12 (a) shall include the following elements: 

13 (1) The total amount of all assessed and vol14 untary contributions, including in-kind, of the 

15 United States Government to the United Nations 

16 and United Nations affiliated agencies and related 

17 bodies. 

18 (2) The approximate percentage of United 

19 States Government contributions to each United Na20 tions affiliated agency or body in such fiscal year 

21 when compared with all contributions to such agency 

22 or body from any source in such fiscal year. 

23 (3) For each such contribution— 

24 (A) the amount of the contribution; 

25 (B) a description of the contribution (in26 cluding whether assessed or voluntary); 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1238 IS

1 (C) the department or agency of the 

2 United States Government responsible for the 

3 contribution; 

4 (D) the purpose of the contribution; and 

5 (E) the United Nations or United Nations 

6 affiliated agency or related body receiving the 

7 contribution. 

8 (c) SCOPE OF INITIAL REPORT.—The first report re9 quired under subsection (a) shall include the information 

10 required under this section for the previous five fiscal 

11 years. 

12 (d) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION.—Not 

13 later than 14 days after submitting a report required 

14 under subsection (a), the Director of the Office of Man15 agement and Budget shall post a public version of the re16 port on a text-based, searchable, and publicly available 

17 Internet website. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as                           ( print page 8674)                        amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.                

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated Program Project Application (P01).                    

*Date:*                         March 9, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         2 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Yong Gao, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, Room #3G13B National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 5601 Fishers Lane, MSC 9823, Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 669-5048,                         *yong.gao@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 10, 2015.

David Clary,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-03214 Filed 2-17-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
/evine, citar at eseton a 6 3 we
ie pate cen ; —

wee ee

oy Cintas Procate 4,
. Seen we see aes. “enthusiastionliy
. on rae

era, yeaa, so» latter ;

. . os , ;
° oe i mie ——e





se Pee soca ot oo(ak-zt) fee rs step seeoummsesaue

rain eran .

> aahdovemear hth end paycbalogieal, benstits.
ete em Nanguard the. regult). sole

BBYE-190

exciunts. FROM AUTOMATIC |. °
 REGRADIAG,







UGA ‘inded MIDAS $2; it (9-600) ‘for 45 Sane 1999



ROM AUTOMATIC
DING; vod 5200.10
», DOES. ‘NOT APPLY



).B-a60 0 sithaciaod WE-1A7L
aval sas meres alae 7

ieee ol eel sae

Aeststant,Seirtary Quiros va, gata Yetefed on.
ons ecoerontet apie soogleration, :





1°.



_ WP Dovetopeent: Pian for VS 127% approved, by Hq URAP, |
>) issued. Development Divwottve Ho! 85 approving
; samele) ant Deven System. WS 127 given 1A

y

Dect tp For azomanic
BOREGRADING, 60 DIR 3200.10 |
_., DOES “NOT: “APPLY



REGRADING x DIR. 5200.10
DOES NOTSARPEY,



M AUTOMATIC

i>)
fo
marry



fnarit Bo.: 4. to ARPA Order 17-50 ive
‘thy BelLlnetler stead ‘to obtain
agli ty

conthin paytoads.o¢ arbttrany. chapes that way: be

"-Aiitrease propeliant capacity. (95.16). Deliver
a Bisetle Bangs toro. :
Sate meee



ee att oe

2s
ete.

4 ig 5 § of

(ie Geer sh
Saat _

Navy and the Air Toros requested assigaent of any Sarth-
airoling satellite deve! to their respective services.
On 16 Janary 1946, the Navy withdrev their "sale right” claim.
12 Semery 1948,

General Hogt 5. Vandenberg, in a policy atatement on &

satellite vehicle, noted. thet RAD on a satellite vehicle should
be pursned as repidly ao state-of-the-art permatted.

Q Ascot 99h

fe} 11652,

i




Ady Fence
187 “ag
ives"

ween

: AP O(Gi7)-101. gtven IMD fae Thor bogated,
fobiles, Hole bona Os SiO0OaSS je nian



Be Bye cleo of Serie 1 Date vatcan =
: (Ryecene ewe"): wathbend.

—UAAP etvises 62D that MIDAS P63 ‘ung Seah peheniy
: paces ep ame reauoete estimate of progran

8526-130

za :
- Reais <DIR-5200.10
a NoT -



«gg (RMD ttowua ‘APIA ‘sey coated 7,9 So’ fund the
‘W8 1271 propren between 15 Angut al $0 Sovener 10h :

fore ge



Neu TSHATIC |

oF
oe.
a7.





ct a5 we weve :

vn oan Ho, scasrMeotrical
. 1845, ner | Monee Converters
SS Soe Pent set or eens

5 POD Ho, 15, we "

Mos, Up wes.





ROM AUTOMATIC
DIR: 5200.10 | -
APPLY,



2

FROM AUTO.
2 DAR 8200.10
DOES NOF-.APPLY...





: HAND Corporation: 4uttiated, » oubecntoedt vite Herth :
Aimee men: Aviation i Ton.) forthe wot ofa mateliiee ovbital
seeleath praniog sek . Comba.

D D FREMNAUTOMATHS
BGO aut 20



rng pected fpr Shoter

Astinahes during



TAREE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance Center Improvements Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, March 11, 2015.

      ( print page 8949)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Otis Simpson at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-3332.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance Center Improvements Project Committee will be held Wednesday, March 11, 2015, at 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Otis Simpson. For more information please contact: Otis Simpson at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-3332, TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Room 1509, National Office, Washington, DC 20224, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The committee will be discussing various issues related to the Taxpayer Assistance Centers and public input is welcomed.

Dated: February 12, 2015.

Otis Simpson,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2015-03507 Filed 2-18-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P