alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.24

    ADDENDUM TO COLLATERAL SECURITY AGREEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 1, 2001 BETWEEN
         ACTRADE CAPITAL, INC. AND XETEL CORPORATION (THE "AGREEMENT")
     ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     A.  Effective February 4, 2002, Paragraph 3 (iii) of the Agreement is
         hereby modified to read as follows:

     "3. GENERAL TERMS OF THIS SECURITY AGREEMENT. The parties agree that the
     following terms and conditions shall govern this Security Agreement:

     (iii)  Upon default in payment of (i) the sum of $8,667.13 on or before
            February 6, 2002, (default charges for extending the debt to
            February 20, 2002), (ii) the Restructured TADs on or before
            February 20, 2002, or (iii) any facts otherwise constituting a
            default under this Agreement, Actrade shall immediately notify Maker
            in writing that a default has been declared. Maker shall have two
            (2) business days to cure the default. If not cured within such
            period then, without further notice to Maker, Actrade shall take all
            steps necessary to effect enforcement and collection of the
            collateral security described herein in Schedule A.

     B.  In all other respects the aforesaid Agreement and each and every
         provision thereof shall remain in full force and effect, without change
         or modification thereto.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS ADDENDUM TO THE
AGREEMENT UNDER THEIR SEALS AS OF FEBRUARY 4, 2002.

ACTRADE CAPITAL, INC.                  XETEL CORPORATION

By:                                    By: /s/ [ILLEGIBLE]
   --------------------------             ----------------------------
     Richard Couzzi                          NAME:  [ILLEGIBLE]
     Vice President, Credit &                TITLE: CEO
       Collections
# C_2005106EN.01002403.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/24

---

Action brought on 12 January 2005 by Hoya Corporation against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case T-9/05)

(2005/C 106/56)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 12 January 2005 by Hoya Corporation, established in Tokyo, (Japan) represented by A. Nordemann, lawyer.

Indo Internacional S.A.established in Barcelona (Spain) was also a party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Decision of the First Board of Appeal of the OHIM of 3 November 2004 in case R 433/2004-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Decision of the First Board of Appeal of the OHIM of 3 November 2004 in case R 433/2004-1;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

| Applicant for Community trade mark: | The applicant |
| --- | --- |
| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark ‘AMPLITUDE’ for products in class 9 (eyeglasses etc.), Community trade mark application No. 1 723 931 |
| Proprietor of mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | Indo Internacional S.A. |
| Mark or sign cited in opposition: | National figurative mark ‘AMPLY’ for products in class 9 (eyeglasses etc.) |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Opposition rejected |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Annuls contested decision; registration refused |
| Pleas in law: | Violation of Article 8 paragraph 1(b) of Regulation 40/94 (1) |

Applicant for Community trade mark:

The applicant

Community trade mark sought:

Word mark ‘AMPLITUDE’ for products in class 9 (eyeglasses etc.), Community trade mark application No. 1 723 931

Proprietor of mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Indo Internacional S.A.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

National figurative mark ‘AMPLY’ for products in class 9 (eyeglasses etc.)

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Opposition rejected

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Annuls contested decision; registration refused

Pleas in law:

Violation of Article 8 paragraph 1(b) of Regulation 40/94 (1)

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 11, p. 1)

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 29 (Thursday, February 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 7874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02960]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute Amended; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Cancer Institute Clinical Trials and Translational Research Advisory 
Committee, March 04, 2015, 09:00 a.m. to March 04, 2015, 04:00 p.m., 
National Institutes of Health, Building 31, C-Wing, 6th Floor, 31 
Center Drive, Room 10, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the 
Federal Register on January 09, 2015, 801428.
    The meeting notice is amended to reflect that the meeting will also 
be available via http://videocast.nih.gov The meeting is open to the 
public.

    Dated: February 9, 2015.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-02960 Filed 2-11-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 24, 2022

NO. 03-21-00413-CV

In the Matter of D. E. P.

APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER AND TRIANA

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on July 26, 2021. Having reviewed the 

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial 

court’s order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order. Because appellant is indigent 

and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
SERVED JANUARY 11,2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

LAKE CHELAN AIR SERVICE, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CPCP09NM0007 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2009-0096 

AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER 

Paragraph #2 of the Procedural Order is amended as follows: 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the 

following procedural schedule: 

... On or before June 1, 2010, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, 

but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to production 

requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a discovery dispute 

they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely 

manner... 

iwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP09NM0007 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washuigton, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Franklin L. Smith, Attorney 

Hedrick Smith, PLLC 

800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4000 

Seattle, WA 98104 

TEL: 206-464-1166 

FAX: 206-464-1811 

David F. Shayne, Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057-3356 

TEL: 425-227-2165 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

400 Seventh Street, S.W., Room 5411 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washingt(|n, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
# C_2004299EN.01001701.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 299/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 299/17

---

Imposition by France of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services within France

(2004/C 299/10)

1.   France has decided to impose a public service obligation on scheduled air services between Limoges (Bellegarde) and Paris (Orly) pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes.

2.   The public service obligation in respect of scheduled air services between Limoges (Bellegarde) and Paris (Orly) is as follows:

Minimum frequency

The service must be operated throughout the year, excluding public holidays and the rerouting periods in August and at the end of the year, with at least two return trips a day, one in the morning and one in the evening, from Monday to Friday and one return trip on Saturday morning and Sunday evening.

The service must be non-stop between Limoges (Bellegarde) and Paris (Orly).

Timetables

Timetables must be such as to enable passengers on business trips during the working week to make the round trip within the day and to spend at least seven hours at their destination, whether Paris (Orly) or Limoges (Bellegarde).

Flight bookings

Seats on these flights must be marketed by at least one computerised booking system.

Continuity of service

Except in cases of force majeure, the number of flights cancelled for reasons directly attributable to the carrier must not exceed 3 % of the number of flights scheduled in any year. The carrier must give six months' notice before discontinuing the service.

Community carriers are hereby informed that the operation of air services without regard to the above-mentioned public service obligation may result in administrative and/or criminal penalties.

3.   Slots are currently reserved at Paris (Orly) airport for the scheduled Limoges (Bellegarde) – Paris (Orly) service pursuant to Article 9 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 of 18 January 1993 on common rules for the allocation of slots at Community airports. Air carriers interested in this route can obtain information about these slots from the Paris airports coordinator.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2235 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2235

     To improve air travel for passengers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2017

  Ms. Judy Chu of California introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To improve air travel for passengers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Saving All Flyers from Ejection and 
Securing Everyone's Access to Travel Act'' or the ``SAFE SEAT Act''.

SEC. 2. AIR TRAVEL IMPROVEMENTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Transportation shall issue or 
revise regulations to ensure that--
            (1) a passenger, after boarding an aircraft for a flight, 
        is not subjected to the use of force or involuntary removal 
        unless directly necessary for safety or security;
            (2) air carriers resolve all issues relating to overbooking 
        of a flight prior to beginning boarding for that flight; and
            (3) air carriers, before an individual is denied boarding 
        involuntarily with respect to a flight, make a compensation 
        offer--
                    (A) to any individual willing to voluntarily forgo 
                boarding for that flight; and
                    (B) in an amount that is at least the maximum 
                compensation amount required under Federal regulations 
                for passengers denied boarding involuntarily.
    (b) Air Carrier Defined.--In this section, the term ``air carrier'' 
has the meaning given that term in section 40102(a) of title 49, United 
States Code.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

        Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Henry E.
Gemino, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of Profile
Technologies, Inc., hereby certify that the Annual Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Profile Technologies, Inc.


                                              /s/ Henry E. Gemino
                                              -----------------------
                                              Henry E. Gemino
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              and
                                              Chief Financial Officer
exhibit10_1.htm


    Exhibit
10.1

     

    


     

    September
29, 2008

     

    China
Gene Ltd.

     

    Hong
Kong

     

    Re:           Rescission
of Agreement

     

    Dear Mr.
Wang Yang:

     

    Pursuant
to our discussion this letter will confirm that Chine Gene Ltd. and
International Consolidated Companies, Inc. agree to rescind the transaction
between them as effectuated through Grow Ease International Ltd. and AIM Sky
Ltd., both British Virgin Island corporations.

     

    Any
expenses incurred by either party during this transaction will be the
responsibility of the party and the parties agree that there is no further
obligation between them. The agreement is hereby rescinded as if it had been
terminated prior to closing. Any share ownership shall be returned to the
respective party so that both are in the same position as if the transaction had
not closed.

     

    Sincerely,

     

    INTERNATIONAL
CONSOLIDATED COMPANIES INC.

     

    /s/
Antonio F. Uccello, III

    


    ANTONIO
F. UCCELLO III

    CEO

    


    


    /s/ Wang
Yang

    


    READ AND
AGREED BY CHINA GENETIC LTD.

    MR. WANG
YANG
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2275

JANE DOE, as Next Friend of Individuals Known to the 

Defendant as Child 1 and Child 2 in the YKND Series,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

NATHAN BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District 

Judge. (1:14-cv-01094-MJG)

Submitted: February 27, 2015 Decided: March 11, 2015

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathan Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Jonathan Kelly, 

SILVERMAN, THOMPSON, SLUTKIN & WHITE, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Nathan Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s 

orders denying his motion to dismiss the complaint, denying 

Brown’s motion to add Defendants, granting the Plaintiff’s 

motion to dismiss Brown’s counterclaims, and denying 

reconsideration. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over 

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory 

and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 

545-46 (1949). The orders Brown seeks to appeal are neither 

final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We 

also deny Brown’s motions for clarification of the record on 

appeal and to correct the record. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Torgerson (Stanley), by guardian *ad litem,*Appellant, vs. Jensen, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Bidl, Biart & Bieberstein*of Madison.

For the respondent: *Richmond, Jackman, Wilkie & Toebaas,*attorneys, and *Lawrence E. Hart*of counsel, all of Madison.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
From: Yanca, Catherine To: "Gary.Kunkel@hsc.utah.edu" Cc: OTAQ Subject: RE: Your EPA Inquiry: Tier III early adoption Date: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 1:12:00 PM



### Hi Gary,

Thank you for your inquiry regarding early compliance with EPA’s proposed Tier 3 standards. As described in the proposal, early credits can be earned by vehicle manufacturers or refiners who reduce their vehicle emissions or gasoline sulfur before 2017. These are credits for voluntary early compliance, and can be used to facilitate compliance with the Tier 3 program in later years. While vehicle emission control technologies can be put in place without lowering the sulfur level of gasoline, they would have higher emissions than we are expecting under the Tier 3 program. The proposed sulfur limits are necessary to enable newly-designed vehicles to meet the more stringent Tier 3 emissions standards.
Regards, Cay

Catherine (Cay) A. Yanca US EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality Assessment and Standards Division 2000 Traverwood Drive Ann Arbor, MI 48105 Phone: 734.214.4769

Gary Kunkel ---01/27/2014 11:46:13 AM---Hello! I noticed in the "Regulatory Announcement" about Tier III that "credits for early compliance"

From: Gary Kunkel < Gary.Kunkel@hsc.utah.edu > To: OTAQ@EPA Date: 01/27/2014 11:46 AM Subject: Tier III early adoption

Hello! I noticed in the "Regulatory Announcement" about Tier III that "credits for early compliance" were mentioned. Is it possible for states to adopt Tier III standards before 2017? As Utah would stand to benefit greatly (perhaps more than any other state) from early adoption, we'd like to push for it if possible. I'm assuming the vehicular emissions control requirements (at least for the early phase model years) won't require the proposed lower sulfur gas as well?
Many thanks,Gary Kunkel MD Utah Physician's for Healthy Environment
# C_2004201EN.01000502.xml

| 7.8.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/5

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 22 June 2004

in Case C-439/02: Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Maritime Transport - Directive 95/21/EC - Maritime safety - Port State control of vessels - Insufficient number of inspections)

(2004/C 201/09)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-439/02: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: K. Simonsson and W. Wils ) v French Republic (Agents: G. de Bergues and P. Boussaroque ) — application for a declaration that, by failing to carry out a total number of annual inspections corresponding to at least 25 % of the number of individual vessels which entered its ports in 1999 and 2000, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5(1) of Council Directive 95/21/EC of 19 June 1995 concerning the enforcement, in respect of shipping using Community ports and sailing in the waters under the jurisdiction of the Member States, of international standards for ship safety, pollution prevention and shipboard living and working conditions (port State control) (OJ 1995 L 157, p. 1), — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: C. Gulmann, President of the Chamber, S. von Bahr and R. Silva de Lapuerta (Rapporteur), Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 22 June 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to carry out inspections of at least 25 % of the number of individual vessels which entered its ports in 1999 and 2000, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5(1) of Council Directive 95/21/EC of 19 June 1995 concerning the enforcement, in respect of shipping using Community ports and sailing in the waters under the jurisdiction of the Member States, of international standards for ship safety, pollution prevention and shipboard living and working conditions (port State control); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to carry out inspections of at least 25 % of the number of individual vessels which entered its ports in 1999 and 2000, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5(1) of Council Directive 95/21/EC of 19 June 1995 concerning the enforcement, in respect of shipping using Community ports and sailing in the waters under the jurisdiction of the Member States, of international standards for ship safety, pollution prevention and shipboard living and working conditions (port State control);

| 2. | Orders the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the French Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 19, 25.1.2003.

---
asn

MaiLifigianMMUURASEMUIN.

MEM •

1.. No Istorseptor voreisee be greared.

a. Cbresse f swiglass,*as abaft der to be ebed

addition& presswarat.

2. tasty MINI L4811 elresett will be presared.

. leastiest to s eirwartlysI posessed.

b. arrept ter later mat at J47 maims atassuals.

e. lInetios/ toe et agolpseet.

desetisal great bwrilllag .*pt.

s. SisaSisal wee parte. -•so

Urea elseratt etsts tape to be sea tow A204 teetteg et . 4.

• varlets stuidolste• • '.734.-

...

Is deptleaties at shop supply al periabable tat hies. .!g

York yin be sestreated ter Ity arimat. et the esletlas 4

soatart for stellar yak.

S. Letter Cootrest somelowah mos .s prestiertle. T. A

b. Detlaitive swordurat raprtlaties by apresaately lary 1956.

The proposed Irpitreapos powered IMAMS Is Isposetial.

Types et darrlops sad systems galena Is enetrusties,

segloserlas siolt &apostles vIll be Ideotleal to these wa g ter seastrasties et eurrest veep et airsoatt.

9. Alwerott sill be seastrastel est asseobled Is lekerstield

taellity sad flows arm.

•

•

1'4

jier(

-
•••n •

MEUNIER.

3.. Wad resserdiessase stramts Inisses Usr % NIS

J102

atm argaiNg are WO amt Moms Avapsi

nessier 5T.

Sts kits for Ms arellog toy 15 Am 56.

31112DO5112 COIN 

sit, tasiuttas wires awl gamma hurnies

1111111•11

6 sir UI kits, arelastios filobt

Protestlas asseptesse 21.2.14

*W. mot et =Its

laseriag assaollsbell laterespor vend.

!Ms/ sittistel prise

Wot% • 5.0

MAL 111211

n••n•• Mrs.