alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40515

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

VICTOR JAVIER MUNOZ-ZAMORA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:12-CR-2045-1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Victor Javier 

Munoz-Zamora (Munoz) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief 

in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Munoz has filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein, as well as Munoz’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 21, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40515 Document: 00512539972 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2014
No. 13-40515

that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-40515 Document: 00512539972 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2014
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

**Pursuant to, and solely for the purposes of,18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002), each of the undersigned hereby certifies in the capacity and on the dateindicated below that:**

 

**1.**              The Quarterly Report ofCache, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 29, 2008 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

 

**2.**              The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of Cache, Inc.

 

 
| **May 8,  2008** | **BY:**    | ** /s/ Thomas E. Reinckens**                       |
|-----------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
| ** **            | ** ** | **     Thomas E.  Reinckens**  |
| ** **            | ** ** | **     Chairman and  Chief**   |
| ** **            | ** ** | **     Executive  Officer**    |
| ** **            | ** ** | **     (Principal  Executive** |
| ** **            | ** ** | **     Officer)**              |

 

 
| **May 8,  2008** | **By:**    | ** /s/ Margaret Feeney**                                                                                          |
|-----------------------|------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| ** **            | ** ** | **     Margaret  Feeney**                                                                     |
| ** **            | ** ** | **     Executive  Vice President and       Chief Financial Officer** |
| ** **            | ** ** | **     (Principal  Financial and**                                                            |
| ** **            | ** ** | **     Accounting  Officer)**                                                                 |

 

**1**

----
# C_2005094EN.01000402.xml

| 19.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3743 — Dupont/DDE)

(2005/C 94/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 12 April 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3743. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3743. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### Lutterloh *v.*Powell.

A warrant that does not state that the sum demanded is over five pounds, but only that t is under twenty pounds, will not authorize an arrest, and if the officer makes an arrest undo- such warrant and afterwards permits the person arrested to go at large, he will not be liable for an escape.

Case, fot* an escape. The declaration stated that *Las-siter*was indebted to the Plaintiff i» a sum under twenty pounds — that he took out a warrant against *Lassiter,*the tenor whereof was inserted in the declaration, and w as expressed to be for a sum under twenty pounds — that *Powell,*the constable, received the warrant, arrested *Lassiter,*and suffered him to escape. The warrant, when produced, commanded tiie officer to summon *Lassiter,*to answer *Luiterloh*for a debt under twenty pounds.

*Per curiam*

After argument, by *Williams*for the Plaintiff, ami *Davie*for the Defendant. If *Powell*was not authorised to arrest, and did arresi, and then suffered him to go at large, the action will not lie. If he had any authority to arrest it must be by force of the warrant ■ — this is plain from considering the reason why the law requires a warrant in writing at all. It requires it, that the officer may be directed precisely7 what to do, that he may know how far lie ought to go, and that he may produce it in his justification, when questioned for what he has done under it. The Jaw will not permit that an officer shall proceed to arrest a man, and deprive him of his liberty, unless pursuant to an authority given him for that purpose. If he was permitted to act without a warrant in wi'iting, he might mistake the verbal precept of the magistrate, and do either more or less than he. was commanded. From the uncertainty of verbal directions, and owing to the not recollecting the precise terms of them, he might easily act otherwise than intended. For the benefit of the citizen therefore, that he may at all times be able to call upon the officer to produce his authority, and to see precisely what it was, the law established the necessity of a written warrant. Any thing contained in ■the directions of the magistrate, or of the Plainliff, that is not contained in the warrant, is no authority upon which the officer can act. This warrant, in the present ease, is not such an one, as can in law justify the arrest_ The act of 1786, directs that where the sum is over five pounds, the constable shall arrest, and hold to bail. It *456should appear in the warrant that the sum is over five pounds, otherwise he cannot ariesf. This warrant does not. state that the sum demanded was over five pounds;, but only that, it was under twenty. It might, be also under five, and therefore the arrest was illegal, and releasing the Defendant in the warrant was proper and what he ought to have done. The Plaintiff was nonsuited,.

*Note.*—Vide *Ellis*v. *Gee, 1 Murph.*445.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: In the Matter of Approximately $80,600.00

Appellate case number: 01-14-00424-CV; 01-15-00874-CV

Trial court case number: 1417446; 1210228

Trial court: 351st District Court of Harris County

On July 7, 2017, Regina Criswell filed a motion to substitute counsel for Abraham Fisch.

On July 17, 2017 R. Scott Shearer, Fisch’s attorney of record, filed an objection to Criswell’s 

motion. Criswell filed a response to Shearer’s objection on July 18, 2017.

Tex. R. App. P. 6.5(d) governs the procedure for substitution of counsel. The Rule 

contemplates that the attorney of record file a motion in this Court seeking to withdraw before 

substitution of new counsel may be permitted. Lewis v. State, 07-15-00061-CR, 2015 WL 

1143188, at *1 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Mar. 13, 2015, no. pet.). The Rule provides that, if a new 

attorney is substituting for the withdrawing attorney, the motion to withdraw must state “the 

substitute attorney’s name, mailing address, [et cetera].” The withdrawing attorney must then 

notify the Appellant. Tex. R. App. P. 6.5(b), (d). 

By her motion to substitute filed July 7, 2017, Criswell seeks to be substituted for Shearer 

as Fisch’s attorney of record. This motion was not filed by Shearer and does not otherwise comply 

with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Neither Appellant nor Shearer signed the motion. In 

fact, Shearer has filed an objection in which he refuses to withdraw. Absent a withdrawal by 

Shearer, Criswell’s motion is deficient.

We deny Appellant’s motion to substitute Criswell for Shearer as the attorney of record in 

this appeal.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

Acting individually

Date: July 20, 2017
Exhibit 13.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
     `In connection with the annual report of SK Telecom Co., Ltd. (the“Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Shin Bae Kim, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.     Date: May 31, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONATAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL DATA AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          23,643
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,286
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 7,450
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     93,048
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          53,180
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            53,195
<LOANS>                                        331,753
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,548
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 525,993
<DEPOSITS>                                     464,439
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,730
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,124
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,675
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,973
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,061
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 525,993
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 22,874
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,389
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   544
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                30,807
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              13,424
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,628
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           16,179
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      786
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  22
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,041
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,854
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,623
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.66
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.48
<LOANS-NON>                                        567
<LOANS-PAST>                                       810
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,250
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      607
<RECOVERIES>                                       119
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,548
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,548
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          4,548
        

</TABLE>
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111416 

TOP SECRET 

~ATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

111111111111111111111 111111111\mlllll 

THE NRO STAFF October 7, 1969 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. McLUCAS 

SUBJECT: NRO Documents for the 303 Committee 

In paragraph 2 of my note of September 23, I reported that 

Mr. Packard had asked Dr. Tucker to provide to each of the 303 

Committee members a copy of the basic NRP documents. Mr. 

McGough asked our assistance last week in identifying several 

of the documents. 

Mr. McGough has provided, for our information, a copy of 

Dr. Tucker's package. It is attached. 

Colonel, USAF 

TOP SEeRET EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

DOD D1RECTIVE 5200.10 DOES NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111416 

CONTROL NO, ______ _ 

COPY ___ OF ___ COPIES 

PAGE. ___ OF ___ PAGES 
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111416 HANOI E VIA 

I Ur 5ftKtl BYEMAN 

CONlROl SYSTEM 

)-SfNATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

THE NRO STAFF September 23, 1969 

NOTE FOR DR. McLUCAS 

Captain Wilson (in Mr. Packard's office) called me early this 

afternoon to relay information on the discussion of two particular 

subjects by the 303 Committee during its meeting this morning: 

1. You are aware that we were asked by Mr. Packard on 

September 12 to provide a copy of Mr. Laird's letter to the 

President and our NRP Annex to the STG report to each of the 

members of the 303 Committee for their review. Captain Wilson 

stated that the Committee decided this morning that there was no 

need to distribute the NRP Annex to the Space Task Group. Dr. 

Kissinger indicated that the Vice President will be told that a 

briefing of the NRP is available should he wish to hear it. It is 

our understanding ,that we would be asked to present this briefing 

should it be requested. 

2. Dr. Kissinger indicated that the President desired some 

description of the NRP and the NRO. Mr. Packard has asked Dr. 

Tucker to provide to each of the 303 Committee members a copy 

of the basic DOD-CIA agreement on the NRP (charter) and a copy 

of the document which establishes the NRO as a separate operating 

element of the DOD to manage and conduct the Program. Captain 

Wilson is preparing a draft of a note which Dr. Tucker will use in 

transmitting the copy of these documents to Dr. Kissinger. Dr. 

Kissinger apparently will use these documents in discussing the 

NRP with the President. 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

WILLIAM R. YOST 

Lt Colonel, USAF 

TOP SECRET EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

DOD DIRECTIVE 5200.10 DOES NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111416 

CONTROL NO ______ _ 

COPY ___ o, ___ COPiES 

PAGE ___ o, ___ PAGES
EXHIBIT 3.3

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF CNET, INC.

CNET, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the Delaware General Corporation Law
(the "Company"),

DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

FIRST: that the Board of Directors of the Company at a special meeting of the Board of
Directors called for such purpose, duly adopted resolutions by unanimous vote setting forth a
proposed amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said amendment
to be advisable, and directing that said amendment be submitted to the stockholders of the Company
for their consideration at the Company's next annual meeting.  The resolution setting forth the
proposed amendment is as follows:

RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the Company hereby adopts, approves, and
declares advisable a proposal to amend the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, which
proposed amendment would strike in its entirety paragraph (A) of Article IV of the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Company and insert in its place a new paragraph (A) of Article IV, as
follows:

"	A.	The total number of shares of capital stock that the Company shall have the
authority to issue is 405,000,000, consisting of (a) 400,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $.0001 par
value per share, and (b) 5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, $.01 par value per share."

SECOND: that thereafter, stockholders of the Company holding the necessary number of shares
as required by statute, duly adopted and approved said amendment at the annual meeting of the
stockholders of the Company held on May 26, 1999 pursuant to Section 222 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law.

THIRD: that said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242
of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Directors of the Company has caused this Certificate of
Amendment to be signed by Douglas N. Woodrum, its Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, as of May 26, 1999.

CNET, INC.,

A Delaware corporation

By:  /s/ DOUGLAS N. WOODRUM

Douglas N. Woodrum

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

---
**ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.**
**List of Subsidiaries****Name** 	**Date of Incorporation** 	**Jurisdiction** 	Minera Gavilan, S.A. de C.V. 	09/17/1996 	Mexico 	Compania Minera Zapata, S.A. de C.V. 	02/26/1998 	Mexico 	Almaden de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. 	11/10/1992 	Mexico 	Republic Resources Ltd. 	10/02/1987 	British Columbia, Canada 	Almaden America Inc. 	10/05/1990 	Nevada, U.S.A.
NRO satellite successfully launched aboard 

Delta IV Heavy

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE January 17, 2009 

CONTACT: (703) 808-5050

A National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) payload was successfully launched aboard a United 

Launch Alliance Delta IV Heavy lift launch vehicle from Space Launch Complex 37, Cape 

Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida, at 9:47 p.m., EST, on January 17, 2009.

“This evening’s flawless launch is the fruition of many months of hard work and collaboration of 

government and industry teams,” said Col John Stizza, Director of the NRO’s Office of Space 

Launch and NRO Mission Director. This is the first launch of an NRO payload aboard a Delta IV 

Heavy lift launch vehicle. Tonight’s launch was the third flight of the Delta IV Heavy. 

This evening’s launch was dedicated to the memory of Dennis Fitzgerald, former Principal 

Deputy Director of the NRO, who retired from the NRO on April 2007 after 33 years of 

dedicated service and who died on December 31, 2008. 

The NRO is a joint organization engaged in the research and development, acquisition, launch 

and operation of overhead reconnaissance systems necessary to meet the needs of the 

Intelligence Community and of the Department of Defense. 

-- NRO --
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OFGOLD BANC CORPORATION, INC.

I Rick J.
Tremblay, Chief Financial Officer of Gold Banc Corporation, Inc. hereby certify, in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that:

| | (a) | The
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, which accompanies this
certification, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (b) | The
information contained in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005, which accompanies this certification, fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Gold Banc Corporation, Inc.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                      |  | By: /s/ RICK J. TREMBLAY                | 
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------- | 
|Date:  March 13, 2006 |  | Rick J. TremblayChief Financial Officer |
IC 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1362 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2015 

Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

AN ACT 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to clarify 

waiver authority regarding programs of all-inclusive care 

for the elderly (PACE programs). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

S 1362 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY RE2 GARDING PACE PROGRAMS. 

3 Subsection (d)(1) of section 1115A of the Social Se4 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1315a) is amended by striking ‘‘and 

5 1903(m)(2)(A)(iii)’’ and inserting ‘‘1903(m)(2)(A)(iii), 

6 and 1934 (other than subsections (b)(1)(A) and (c)(5) of 

7 such section)’’. 

Passed the Senate August 5, 2015. 

Attest: JULIE E. ADAMS, 

Secretary. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS