alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 1/11111116,311111

WASHINGTON. O.C.

THE NRO STAFF 6 March 1974

MELORANDUM FOR MR. DIRKS, CIA

BRIGADIER GENERAL B URN SAFSP

RAM GEIGER,

COLONEL BAIL

SUBJECT: Organizational and Functional Changes to the NRO Staff

411.111111MMINIPformer Scientific Advisor to the NRO,

was detailed to the Office of the Assistant Secretary of

Air Force for Research and Development on 17 February 1974.-777

RO office subse uentl has been dissolved.

responsibilities:.

have been assume by the Office of the Deputy Director for -.

Programs under Colonel Harold P. Wheeler. : .

, 

A new staff element, the Office of the Deputy Director

for Concepts and Applicationa, designated SAFSS-6, has

established effective 4 March 1974. A copy of its charter

attached. Colonel James R. Blankenship has been appointed so--;—r

head this office. The office will be composed of representatives from each of the three services with the possible future

addition of representatives of non-services agencies/organizations. It will function primarily in assisting all elements

of the NRO in developing a better understanding of the needs

for and the uses of the products. DOD tactical, as well as

national reconnaissance requirements will be addressed-. However, the office is not intended to be competitive with or

duplicative of any other NRO element. Our hope is to

establish a close working relationship between this new

office and the NRP . prOgram offices and to engender the feeling that the office exists to assist the program offices

whenever possible.

•

all111111.1111111"'_ COPY Of COPIES

PAGE OP PAGES
Brigadier General, USAF

Director

*********

Primary responsibility for NRO program matters still

rests with the Office of the Deputy Director for Programs,

and for operational matters with the Deputy

rector Operations, SAFSS-4.

1 Attachment

Charter

1111111111111111111/1111111 abbabbfr.

COPY OF COP Es

PAGE.r—OF .7--' PAGES
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

99-1008.

#### State ex rel. DePew v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 98AP-84. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of *1458Appeals for Franklin County. It appeal’s from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due August 19, 1999, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed *sua sponte.*
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Unified Grocers, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended
January 1, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alfred A. Plamann, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C
Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
for the periods presented in the Report.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 15, 2011



/s/    Alfred A. PlamannAlfred A. PlamannPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
(491O-13-PI

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal A\'iation Administration 14CFR Part 39 (Docket No. FAA-2008-1098; Dir~~torate Identifier 2008-NM-J08-AD;



## 105"1/ 24-I') Amendment 3~-**j

## t<fi 201O~i<*-**1

- RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747SR, and 747SP Series Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. 

### -{():)

~ V>1, 

### ,~ 

# \\/,KIIO
SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) for the products lis

•mAUISIG above. This AD requires adding two new indicator lights on acertain panel to inform t m captain and first officer ofalow pressure condition inthe left and right override/jettiso pwnps ofthe center wing tanks. This AD also requires replacing the left and right I NITIALSISIG override/jettison switches on the M154 fuel con101 module on the P4 panel with )ATg improved switches and doing the associated wiripg changes. This AD also requires, for0 I Olm~(; SVMao" certain airplanes, installation ofamounting bracket forthe new indicator lights. This NITIA1.SISIQ also requires arevision to the maintenance program to incorporate airworthiness al limitation No. 28-AWL-22. This AD also requires arevision tothe airplane flight man to advise the flightcrew what to do inthe event that the pump low pressure light on the flight engineer's panel does not illuminate when the pump is selected off. This AD w 0 prompted by fuel system reviews conducted by the manufacturer. We are issuing this toprevent uncommanded operation oftho override/jettison pumps ofthe center wing tanks, and failure to manually shut offthe overriae/jettison pumps at the correct time,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             172
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,645
<ALLOWANCES>                                        65
<INVENTORY>                                      2,324
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          14,765
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,723
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                1
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,115
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,620
<SALES>                                         52,318
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,318
<CGS>                                           35,334
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,334
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,853
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  52
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,079
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,393
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,686
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,686
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .61
        

</TABLE>
#### Murray *v.*Lackey.

From Iredell.

To support an action for a malicious’ prosecution in taking out a warrant against Plaintiff on a charge of perjury, it is necessary for Plaintiff to shew a discharge — a paity bound over to Court has only to attend, and according to our practice, when the term ex. pires, stands discharged, unless rebound, or his default recorded.

Tliis was an action for a malicious prosecution in taking out a State’s warrant against the Defendant on the charge of perjury.

The plaintiff on the trial produced the warrant, and proved that the Defendant had obtained the same as prosecutor, that Plaintiff was arrested under it, carried before a magistrate and bound in recognizance to appear at October term, 1816, of Iredell Superior Court.

The recognizances were found on file among the records of the Court, but no entry was made upon the docket or records that the Defendant in the warrant, now the Plaintiff, had been discharged. No bill of indictment could J)e found among the records, nor did any thing appear from the records to have been done in the case, after the return of the recognizances, except that the Clerk .had made out a bill of costs. Plaintiff proved that the Solicitor told the bail for his appearance at the return term, that he was discharged and might go home,, that *369the prosecuting officer would do nothing in the matter and that the State’s witnesses need not attend another mi * Court. 'The magistrate who took the recognizances, swore that the Solicitor told him the parties were discharged at the return term. Upon the affidavit of the magistrate, it was moved that the entry of discharge be made *nunc jiro tunc;*this motion was refused. The evidence of discharge as above stated was received, subject to the opinion of the Court.

It was referred to this Court to say whether the entry *nunc pro time*should have been allowed; if it should, was it sufficient to prove the discharge of the Defendant in the warrant? And further, were the facts proved as above, without any entry of discharge on the records, sufficient in law to establish the discharge of the now Plaintiff from the prosecution of the warrant?

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Seaweed, Judge:

We think this a plain case. A discharge means, where proceedings are at end and cannot be revived. A party-bound over to Court has'only to attend j and according to our mode of practice, when the term expires, stands discharged, unless rebound, or his default recorded. As to the parol testimony, offered to prove a discharge by the Solicitor and the motion to enter a discharge *nunc pro tunc,*it is of no importance to consider either of them. The rule for a new trial must be discharged.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research (#1203), Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC), Cornell University Site Visit.                    

*Dates & Times:*

May 20, 2015; 7:15 p.m.-9:00 p.m.

May 21, 2015; 7:15 a.m.-8:30 p.m.

May 22, 2015; 7:15 a.m.-4:00 p.m.

*Place:*                         Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Part open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Daniele Finotello, Program Director, Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers Program, Division of Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-4676.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning further support of the MRSEC at Cornell University.                    

Agenda

### Wednesday, May 20, 2015

7:15 p.m.-9:00 p.m. Closed—Briefing of panel

### Thursday, May 21, 2015

7:15 a.m.-4:30 p.m. Open—Review of the MRSEC

5:00 p.m.-6:45 p.m. Closed—Executive Session

6:45 p.m.-8:30 p.m. Open—Dinner

### Friday, May 22, 2015

7:15 a.m.-9:50 a.m. Closed—Executive Session

9:50 a.m.-4:00 p.m. Closed—Executive Session, Draft and Review Report

*Reason for Closing:*                         The work being reviewed during this site visit may include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the MRSEC. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: February 11, 2015.

Suzanne Plimpton,

Acting Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-03170 Filed 2-13-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### E. T. CLEMMONS v. E. *D.*HAMPTON and W. B. MARCH.

In an action for the possession of personal property, tinder sec. 176, 0. O. P., a third party claiming such property, looses his right to be made a party to the suit, after a lapse of three years from the filing his affidavit and his motion to allow him to interplead.

Whether such claimant can appeal from an order of the presiding Judge, refusing his application to be made a *party*— Qiiere.

Civil ACTION for the claim and delivery of personal property-tried before *Cloud, J.,*at the Spring Term, 1873, of Stokes Superior Court, to which it had been removed from Forsythe Superior Court.

A third party, *W.*B. Hampton, applied to be made a party defendant, which application his Honor refused, on the ground that he had lost such right by his own laches. From the order refusing the motion, *W.*B. Hampton appealed.

The facts pertinent to the point decided, are stated in the opinion of the Court.

*T. J. Wilson*and *Gray,*for appellant.

*Scales <& Scales*and *McCorkle c& Bailey,*contra.

RodsiAN, J.

This was an action to recover three stage coaches, eight horses, and eight sets of harness.

The plaintiff claimed and obtained the immediate delivery by proceedings under sec. 176 *et seq.*of C. C. P. The summons was returnable to Spring Term, 1870, of Forsythe Superior Court. In April, 1870, W. B. Hampton (not the original defendant, Hampton,) made affidavit that two of the coaches and one of the horses claimed by the plaintiff, were his property, and served a copy on the sheriff, under sec. 186, C. C. P.

March, one of the defendants, disclaimed title to the property; and afterwards Ephraim Hampton, the other defendant, became bankrupt. At Spring Term, 1873, W. B. Hampton *535moved, under sec. 65, C. C. P., to be made a party to the action. The Judge refused the application, and W. B. Hampton appealed.

"We think it at least doubtful whether *W.*B. Hampton had a right to appeal from such refusal. But conceding, for the sake of t'he argument only, that he had, we concur with the Judge, that he had lost his right to be made a party by his laches.

Section 186, O. 0. P., is intended only for the benefit of the sheriff, and to enable him to protect himself against the claim of the third party, by taking from the plaintiff an indemnity against such claim, before he delivers the property to him. It does not amount, on the part of the third claimant, to becoming a party to the action, it is not a necessary step in that direction, and the third claimant may become a party under sec. 65, without having made and served such affidavit. By the failure to do so, he would have lost his right to sue the sheriff for the trespass, but on becoming a party might obtain judgment against the plaintiff for restitution. W. B. Hampton was entitled to beeome a party if he had .applied in reasonable time. But he has waited for more than three years after ■the seizure, until his elaim appears at least to be barred by the statute of limitations, and he shows no-excuse for the delay. We concur with the Judge below., that he has waived his right by the delay.

Pse .CxteiAM. Judgment affirmed.
# C_2005132EN.01001202.xml

| 28.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 132/12

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof by order of that court of 2 February 2005 in Reisch Montage AG v Kiesel Baumaschinen Handels GmbH

(Case C-103/05)

(2005/C 132/23)

Language of the case: German

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Oberster Gerichtshof (Germany) of 2 February 2005, received at the Court Registry on 28 February 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Reisch Montage AG and Kiesel Baumaschinen Handels GmbH on the following question:

Can a claimant rely on Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 (1) when bringing a claim against a person domiciled in the forum state and against a person resident in another Member State, but where the claim against the person domiciled in the forum state is already inadmissible by the time the claim is brought, because bankruptcy proceedings have been commenced against him, which, under national law, results in a procedural bar?

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22.12.2000 (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1).

1

---
° ’ - SECURITY CLASSIFIL aa

JOINT MESSAGErORM WICLASsIFTED

SPACE BELOW RASERYAD FOR COMMUNICATION CENTER

ARDC AUDRENS AFB MD . 2 of

UNOLAS TROX WOUP-17-10-7. FOR RUG.

REP YOUR LER 1O CCT suBy: DSEABLINIDRED SSE PROGRAM CEFICES.
ny “CHIRAL occremmpanonS ch NOTABLISEAT OF SYSTE PROGGUN
CFFOEES A Sime aoc Bucs 3 ACOA ME ATR 375
SmRISS mans Fours:

.

_ ‘
. ° SIRE, PROGR DIRECTOR
"AmB one “Cou MAURICE A. CRESEADGRO -
“Tr re COL ALBERT J, WEEZEL °. _
‘oma cot sac. rams | |
ams EE Cot, QUENT A. ROPE
" DESCOVERER cL CLAREICE 2. Basa

.

ATLAS, TITAN, CURRAN dp YaDAs suEMLD 3b DocmaNMED As “SYSTEM
PACKS FROGRAS" AND DIBCOVSRER SHOULD BE oH DOOTRERED As A

i
a
i

"" 7 : JON
PRECEDENCE Tre ea (chet) |accounvina Tonia, on nerana TO | GLassiricario
Aston boon | wuum omens
INFO 7 AP x :
FROM: . . SPECIAL INGTRUGTIONS
FED 16S ANGILSS cALIP
Tor .

. . , ~ 4 * fours TIME
“PARTIAL PACKAGS PROGRAM", SANS HAS NOP BEEN TUCLUDED SINCE Tm
. . . . MONTH .
: HEESED STECTAL maton ormuorms Praces re seve sie pu [|
sYMBOL . ° iJerenaruas”
. , . : oe Original £ ae ned
sr H O_1_RITLANO
¥ Thee ee ano WE loaion Vo ome MAME AND TITLE
i por x4 i : 0. J. RITLAND -
aroma ed | EE
UNCLASSIFImp: *

DD 22".173 "Raa FORE TT OO 4 WAL BEUS TS SE . are a :



SECURITY CLASSIFICA —

ESSASEFORM-COM: ATION SHEET WECLA AED

SPEND L6G ANCRLES CALIP

CF Sirs EQ. 32 IS MY INTENE £0 PROCEED UID OWERUAL ADUSEEES TO |
PEROT caghaeig amp MANOTIG SELECIED SYSTES IW THE ADVANCED
DSVELCPINE FRCGRM UNDER "HS CONCEPIS OF THE 375 SERIES RECULATTON.
T At CONMEdD THAT SUCH ACEIONS ARE ESSENETAL 20 mE ACCELERMETOS co
DECISIONS, ISSUANCE OF SOR'S AND FORMAL ESTABLISHIGNE OF SYST
PROGMN OFFICES. IN THE SELECTION OF SESE ADWINCED SYEEES ¥0R
CABG ESET THDGR SHE COUPES OF SHE 375 SERIES REMUARTORS 1 Sem

ieee ~ : wo cal PY COASEIFICAT TON THT

DD as. Tet 7 8

rus SOVEANMENT PRINTING OFFICE: soneesuence  .
..

•1,.....;

5-, • . . • :: 1::1:14...

• .......: -

. . : • , ......

WILLIAM R. YOST .... •••.' -...'''..1- i-'.. . . .•

. .. . • ... • .:,,,

Asst Deputy Director for

Plans & Policy 7: • •

•

. •

CMbop

Conte*

Major. USAF

•

• *.• •

NIRO fitaff

. • .

••••2§, 28 .

agy

MEMORANDUM .** -• FOR cousin, FORD. .5401P . .

. • . • . • SUBJECT: Organisation and Penedo= at the .11694th Test Group

t

•

You will recall Colonel Werthvaan,a note at Mt September 1956, concerahvg the appearing= of magi speelfla Statements en.

,the • mission and activities of the 5593d Tistagaidr. en in= =classified volume entitled "Al/SC Teo:Weal Pacility.lessmary.'m

We have just received • eepy •

.of a more reisimai 43 February

AFSC volume OVUM entitled "Grpniastiii and Penctiow Chart,. Book. AP sat•uft• contra 'mute ow& i-Apec-ost volume contains anmerous generarreferencMii.te

activities of the AMP, 'we have found several ma y speedge rider* emcee to the "reeevery of cipseles ejected Bic= speimsrbithas'

satellites" in the mission descriptions for the 551141h Test Beasp....74.::.

and its subordinate element -- the 5553,4 Test ikpaditiii

(copies attached). These latter refereaces are particularly effea:.'. sive. We feel that the centiared use of seek statemeitiln:"Micilaiisifled" publications could result in serious problems en oar pert

particularly Is light of White Besse and CIA sessitivity as this posii.

We would appreciate year diecessing tlds metteragain I 'wet

Colonel Dawn. •

Atch

Distribution:

Cy 1 to SP

Cy 2 to SS-5

Cy 3 to RF
Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05114 707 

11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 

TOP SrCRE7 

Typed 25 Apr 63/me 

MEMORANDUM FOR DEPUTY DlUCTORI> 14&0 

OumCTO~ NAOSTAFF 

DIRECTOR. PROGRAM D 

4 JUN 1963 

AC,I\ ED 1£IVT 

In accordance with NRO l:ltresttv. dated 13 March 1'83.. the 

deterlnination haa beeD r~ to usip .P'roje.ct TAGBOA.RD to u.w 

Dinetorll .Prognun D. 

14000034670 

a. Th!s projeet wUl remain wltbh1 the pumewof the NBO 

and be coDsidered. IlL eowrt. elandeatine# aMcornpiet e11b1aek acU·~ 

vity t.brou.gaout the coutnle~ test., and os-rational pbaMa. 

Awarfil~U~s of Ws project wW " Ola tI:m stricte.t ~ed .. to-know buta .. 

b~ All activit:iea pel'taming to. tids project will be canted on 

at Area 51 whieh will also eerve as the.prlme ope:rati4n&l ~. 

e .. Tbe CIA, through the Olfiee 81 Speclal ActivlU~lul!$ wlll 

cCQ'tbu. ~ provide eontractWll wppori. 

d. Necessary .f~g wlu be proll"am_dthrouJh ud provl~ by the NItO Comptroller" 

~ 

e. Support proeedu.res for the .A·12/r~ .. u programs will b$ 

uU11zed to tne maxbnwn extent pQ$sib1e .. 

f. Project iDterfaee and/or eoordiuation wID bemamtain.ed 

08 a eontinulng' buis bet'fmen ~ I"rogram Olrfi!lcttu" and the Chief. 

Development Division. OSA. Dol R. 

Distribution: 

Cy 1 

2 

'Handle via B 3 

i . 4 

jContro! Syste~ 

! 6 

I 7 

i 8 

DDNRO/ 

D/ Prog :D.>1' 

Dr •. Scoville for coord 

SS-5 v 

SS-l (SAFUS) 

S8-1 (Col Martin) 

R/F #1 

8S --5 (Quiggin~AG~OAruJ 

BROCKWAY McJiliIlLLAN 
Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05114 707 

/.1'.13 Ji \~·1 6 \)0 "' .. 03 

e (i~0C~ ~V91ic£ticn 

t ~illtgry control. 

/ sf Brock 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C0511,--,4,"-7~O"--7 _____________ _