alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

**i** OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

I **AUSTIN** goroh 1, 19R9

Pereqre>h I. **Of** Seation (b) of srtJolo ! -nrlsed**Civil** Ctztutsr of TeXBG, 1325, reads inDon. John C. Fsrzr, Caroh 1, 1939, Pate 2

"?Zmh offlcc?r

m-mad in this act,w!:ero ho rsce?vcda aalnry w cowonsation for hfa scrvicm, s!;zll

bra cnpoxorodand xrtitted to purc;i:lc~

md hvo c!v.w:cd

to his couxxty, all rmxmtle srpmsea nceess:myin tho pro,rcr and le.-;1

cocr!uct

cf k.is officti,

prwiuns on offlclals'beads, prer;iiun on fire, burglary, th.aft

, robbery inaxmx y6oOt.i.~ pcblic fluMa nnd i;?cludihg the costs of suoty bonn%s for ::is

doputice * * * *
. The very lanr,i?xq;e of such hmreL?.above looted srticlo ;:ir~~,

t!lo offlcinls ~ovornnod t):crcVJ

sbn~luta 'cut!xrity

tr, L-we ob:$r;:ed

to tko county uuch rc:mmablc mponlm?5*s UlC Ix.cos:i:Icy for ttc w.l~coz3ful co1.iluat

or 'iis of:ice. It .c,-.tmoL k.a.ansu:ed

tkt tho Prctiut.

for **offioiulo ’**  bc,nGs

!;GY fcr tho bor,& tci

to provieodby the Gerjztios

is un*t.inG **l8lt.i: nCccs5CZ~**  **3XpCr.30 f** **’ ol!**  **rosimck t&it**  **they** Hl"C **by ll.37**  roxircd to civc toud boforo cntcrln~into the cxc5c:itFo:; of .tl:cir.

d,l;tfcs.

**Ti;io** Ixrrtioukr nrtlolofurtbcr :‘rovides thut:

There a?po<;r'Y

to be RO OChor:

proMsion of the stat&e that :xmld justifythe pnymnt of t!%we itells out 

### cr any other fund.

It is furthor ip.rovidcd i3 ;?mwrar;h2, .5xtion (b) of k'L!clo 529 t!:nt bi t!i;e rejection.

of Claln~ riido aid asscrtodby orficislr. CO~~~i~eSS~itCC

03l a oalsry basis,t:rzt:

It is, ti:crofore., t!m opinion of Z;is deyirtLent, 'andyou are so advised that Art1010 X313 w x.onCcd in 1357 is Llmdxltory 1,?mPnr ::a

the ciut'y

or the Com- ~&~sionoro~

Coxt is oo;:c.x-nod iiith r:opaCt to the pn:ysont

of yraiw;s on offioiol~'bards aad bonds of .l!on.

Zolii C. Farxw, :hroh 1, 1939, Pagj 3

t!aelr cle?~tios,

tind that the rmwer to your second and %:.ird~wstio:~sis iti the afG.rmtive. You ar'e furt!ler c&;i:;ed;i~r'cs:>onae to y&r question :;o. 4, t!;ot

iti the avent t!lo

CO~Lii.XSionPrs

1 Cwrt r&wss to ailOtJ tho lte:.,a Aloh const1tut.o

the- b7sJ.s fpr t3.s opinion,to-wit, bond pro:ij.ms

for oLcflcials

:anC.do-~tios,

tAti& they have their rczody, !iO ?rovidodby 1317,'t.o file sxit in a Oourt of co:qetc;.t

jurisZfctionto rtiq+e:the psyz&::t of t!S Wms .ur.dcr corisidcr~tion.~

. . Tr2Aiw thttt,tIlis~satis~aoto~iiy aqo;rors

your inq:,iry,

‘;c rei3in . .

’ Yours very tr~...lYy.

.

.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

SEPTEMBER 29, 2005

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-14140

Non-Argument Calendar

 

D. C. Docket No. 03-61689-CV-JIC

MEDIANET OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

versus

CITY OF MIRAMAR, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida 

 

(September 29, 2005)

Before TJOFLAT, BIRCH and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We agree with the district court that this case is controlled by Coral Springs
2

Street Systems, Inc. V. City of Sunrise, 371 F.3d 1320 (11th Cir. 2004), and that

appellee is entitled to summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.
NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASJ: 

DECLASSIFIED BY: CIIART ' 

\Jl/OR1'11\1f: Vi -. I' -''l D~~;O·Y f f :"'.1' ...... ' .··.<.·,i",#~H .. , -,:} i 

OR CON"i"f!OL DY .. 

DECLASSIFIED ON: 25 JULY 2012 

OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY DIVISION 

OPTO-MECHANICAL DESIGN ENGINEERING 

Memorandum ME 66 

TO: Distribution DATE: Oc'tober 13, 1971 

FROM: L.B. Molaskey j' 

SUBJECT: Status of RV-3 Recovery 

In a telecon to Lt. Cdr. Doyle concerning the status of the RV-3 

recovery operation Lt. Cdr. Doyle indicated that on the last dive the c~ew of 

the Trieste has successfully operated the recovery hook on the bottom. They 

did not"however, pick up the test shape. 

After maneuvering to the location of the test shape on the bottom 

they were running low on battery power. It was therefore decided to exercise 

the hook in the normal recovery mode without actually maneuvering over the 

test shape. The operation was successful and the pilots are confident they 

can, in fact, pick up the shape given enough time. After surfacing, the Trie8~e 

was loaded into the White sands and the ship C:leparted for HawaU this morning. 

Current schedule is to arrive at the test site on about the 28th of October. 

Lt. Cdr. Doyle asked that I check with him in about 5 or 6 d~ys to confirm illy 

arrival date in Hawaii curre'ntly scheduled for the 27th of .october. 

LBM/cj 

cc: M.F. Maguire 

H.W. Robertson 

R.W. Jones 

C. Karatzas 

P. Petty 

R. Roylance 

J. Braddon· 

_(HQS) 

L.B. 

\':l .. ,.~ ~:: .. '~"; ;,' i 

(.' . ", (. ':. t ,: i ~ ~'.-. ~.. ..:. 

1 f ;
or,

Assistant Deputy Director

for Plans and Policy

-TOP-SEGREF---

NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

THE NRO STAFF May 15, 1970

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. NAKA

SUBJECT: Working Relationships with BOB

Given the continuing number and variety of Mr. Sorrels'

requests for information about the NRP (some quite penetrating in nature), you suggested that we should advise

Mr. Frey--early in his tenure--of the arrangements which

govern interaction between the NRO and BOB.

Charlie Sorrels' free-wheeling and occasionally unilateral

approaches in the past have prompted at least two NRO statements calling for a more closely coordinated working relationship. On May 22, 1969 (TAB A) Dr. McLucas asked for Mr. Mayo's

cooperation in directing all inquiries to the NRO Staff and

Comptroller offices. On September 25, 1969 (TAB B), General

Allen asked Dr. Schlesinger for his help in assuring that

BOB staff members apprise the NRO, in advance, of the specific

subjects to be discussed during BOB visits to NRO activities.

We have prepared an informal letter to Mr. Frey, newly

appointed Director, International PrograMs Division of BOB

and Mr. Sorrels' supervisor, to advise him of the established

arrangements. The letter calls attention to Dr. McLucas'

previous statement on the subject and asks Mr. Frey to continue using the NRO Staff and Comptroller offices as focal

points.

Recommendation: I recommend that you sign the letter to

Mr. Frey at TAB C.

TOP SECRET ICIAPCO 1000 R.0001TG 11141040110

DO: 0 IDECIn l la 00 • 0 200t 101 AM%

COMM DO

COP, Of COPIES

0001/ Or •111051

:Achctio
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 844/2006

of 8 June 2006         

altering the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in the natural state fixed by Regulation (EC) No 820/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The export refunds on the products listed in Article 1(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001, undenatured and exported in the natural state, as fixed in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 820/2006 are hereby altered to the amounts shown in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 9 June 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 June 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 148, 2.6.2006, p. 34.

----

ANNEX

AMENDED AMOUNTS OF REFUNDS ON WHITE SUGAR AND RAW SUGAR EXPORTED WITHOUT FURTHER PROCESSING APPLICABLE FROM 9 JUNE 2006 (1)

----

(1)  The amounts set out in this Annex are not applicable with effect from 1 February 2005 pusrsuant to Council Decision 2005/45/EC of 22 December 2004 concerning the conclusion and the provisional application of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation amending the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 as regards the provisions applicable to processed agricultural products (OJ L 23, 26.1.2005, p. 17).

(1)  This amount is applicable to raw sugar with a yield of 92 %. Where the yield for exported raw sugar differs from 92 %, the refund amount applicable shall be calculated in accordance with Article 28(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001.

----
# C_2004276EN.01000301.xml

| 11.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/3

---

Corrigendum to the


  Official Journal of the European Union
  C 105 of 30 April 2004

Official Journal of the European Union

(2004/C 276/03)

The boxed text which appears on page I/7 is replaced by the following text:

‘All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

Any revenue provided for in Article 18(1) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.’

---
### NUM BER 13-9 7-00 196- CV 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I - E DI NBURG

____ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _______ _ T IM ST U R M , I N D IV ID U A L L Y, A N D D /B /A CEN TE RR

A T UB UL A R COMPA NY, A pp ellan t,
v . T U B U L A RIN SP EC T OR S, IN C ., A p p el le e.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ On a p p ea l f ro m th e C o u n ty C o u rta t L aw N o . 4 of N ue ces Co un ty , T exas .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ 

## ME MOR A ND UM OP IN ION Be fo re Ju stice s Y añ ez , R od rigu ez, an d Be na v ide s M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam Th i s a p p e a l w a s a b a t e d b y t h i s C o u rt o n M a y 2 9 , 1 9 9 7 , d u e t o t h e b a n k ru ptc yof one of the par ti es to t his appeal

. See 11 U. S.C . § 362; see g ene rally T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 8

. Since the ab ate me nt th ere ha s bee n no activ ity in this a ppe al. O n April 16, 20 09, the Cou rt2

or der ed the parti es to fil e an adv is or y r eg ardin g the sta tus of the a ppeal and, i f appli cabl e, a moti on to r ein sta te t he appe al or a mot ion to dis mis s t he appe al. Appel lee r espon ded t o the order by fili ng a moti on to dis mis s, adv is ing the Cou rtthat app ellant w as discha rg ed in b ankru ptcy. Accordingly , app ellee’s m otion to dism iss is GRAN TED a nd th e appea l is her eby DI SM ISSE D. C ost s w il l be ta x ed ag ain st appel lan t. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 4 2.1( d) ( "Abse nt ag re ement of the par ti es, the cour

t w il l tax co sts ag ain st the a ppel lan t.")

. P E RC U R I A M Me moran dum Opi nio n del iv er ed and filed thi s t he 4th d ay

of June, 2009.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 of
Intelligent Systems Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; andb)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:   August 14, 2007
    /s/ Bonnie L. HerronBonnie L. HerronChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 11

                       Service Systems International, Ltd.
                         Computation of Per-Share Income
                              Treasury Stock Method
                            As Modified for 20% Test

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, 1999
                                                                   ------ ----- ------ --- ----
<S>                                                                <C>
Weighted average number of shares outstanding                                  12,757,000
                                                                            =============

Total common and common equivalent shares                                      13,094,988
                                                                            =============

Net income (loss) for the period                                            $ (1,613,163)
                                                                            =============



Total common and common equivalent shares                                      13,094,988
                                                                            =============

Loss per common and common equivalent shares                                $      (0.13)
                                                                            =============
</TABLE>

Earnings per share:

The earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) for the
period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Common stock equivalents are excluded from the computation if their
effect would be anti-dilutive.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1136 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1136

  Relating to the modernization of C-130 aircraft to meet applicable 
   regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 29, 2015

 Mr. Tester (for himself, Mr. Enzi, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Schumer, and 
  Mr. Daines) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  Relating to the modernization of C-130 aircraft to meet applicable 
   regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. C-130 FLEET MODERNIZATION.

    (a) Affirmation of Authority To Modernize.--Congress affirms that, 
for the purposes of modernizing the C-130 aircraft fleet, the Air Force 
has authority to undertake safety and compliance upgrades in lieu of 
the C-130 aircraft avionics modernization program of record to meet 
applicable regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration by 2020.
    (b) Replacement of Limitation.--Section 134 of the Carl Levin and 
Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2015 (Public Law 113-291) is amended by striking subsection (b) 
and inserting the following new subsection (b):
    ``(b) Coordination With FAA in Implementation of Alternative 
Program.--If the Secretary of the Air Force implements in accordance 
with subsection (a)(2) the alternative communication, navigation, 
surveillance, and air traffic management program described in 
subsection (a)(1)(B), the Secretary shall coordinate with the 
Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration in the 
implementation of such program in order to meet or otherwise satisfy 
applicable safety and compliance airspace regulations.''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

**List of Subsidiary Companies**

Channel Services S.A., a Swiss company 

CNET Networks Asia Pacific Pte Ltd, a Singapore company 

CNET Networks Australia Pty Ltd., an Australian company

CNET Networks Deutschland GmbH, a German company 

CNETNetworks (France) SAS, a French company 

CNET Networks Japan KK, a Japanese company 

CNET Networks UK Limited, a United Kingdom company 

dFactory SARL, a Swiss company 

Orange Ball Networks Subsidiary PRC, Inc., a Delaware company 

ZD (Tianjin)Computer Information Technology Co., Ltd., a Chinese company 

CNET (Beijing) Information Technology Co., Ltd., a Chinese company 

Pursuant to Item 601(b)(21)(ii) of Regulation S-K, the names of other subsidiaries of CNET Networks, Inc. are omitted because, considered in the aggregate, theywould not constitute a significant subsidiary as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
<!--/* //NOSONAR */-->
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	NRO launches new, modern and dynamic web experience on NRO.gov
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4619" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/DOD2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="aprint news">
    <div class="header">
        <img height="100" class="print-logo" alt="Site Logo" src="/Portals/135/transparent.png?ver=B2YYtOxzg52QYDIqGLCDCQ%3d%3d" />

        <h1 class="title">NRO launches new, modern and dynamic web experience on NRO.gov</h1>
    </div>
    
<div id="adetail-slick-gallery" class="gallery">
    
    <div class="item">
        
        <div class="image">
            
            <img src="https://media.defense.gov/2023/Aug/21/2003284507/1920/1080/0/720801-F-RQ659-0029.PNG"
                 class="aimage img-responsive"
                 alt="NRO logo- smaller"
                 itemprop="image" />
        </div>
        
        
        
        
        
        <div class="slide-info-hidden">
            <div class="slide-info-inner">
            
            <div class="image-title">NRO logo</div>
            <div class="image-caption">image of NRO logo</div>
        </div>
    </div>
    </div>

    
</div>
<div class="slide-info"></div>





    <div> <span class="date">/ Published July 26, 2023</span></div>
    <span class="dateline-text">Chantilly, VA, </span>
    <p>NRO launches new, modern and dynamic web experience on NRO.gov<br /><br />See the Press Release</p> <br />
</div>

    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,361
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,138
<ALLOWANCES>                                       967
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,352
<PP&E>                                          18,092
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,202)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,554
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,325
<BONDS>                                         36,287
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,841
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   128,554
<SALES>                                        207,746
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               207,746
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  139,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   632
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,223
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,530
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,152
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,378
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,378
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        

</TABLE>
1 In The


### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________
N O

. 09

- 21

- 000 23

- CV

__________________ ROBIN ROUSE, SABRIN A ROUSE, AND NEIL CAMPBELL , ET AL, Appellant s

V.

THOMAS CAMPBELL, FOSTER MANAGEMENT, L

. L

. C

. , FOSTER TIMBER, LTD

. , AND CHRISTY W. KOLVA , Appellee s

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 284th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 18

- 12

- 15871

- CV

________________________________________________________ __________
MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant JP Morgan Chase Bank
, N.A. filed a motion to dismiss its appeal.

The motion is voluntarily made by JP Morgan Chase Bank
, N.A. prior to any

decision of this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). We grant the motion to dismiss

and dismiss the appeal of JP Morgan Chase Bank
, N.A . The appeal shall continue as

to the remaining appellants.2 APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on April 14, 2021 Opinion Delivered April 15, 2021

Before Golemon , C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.