alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03322]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Materials Processing Equipment Technical Advisory Committee: 
Notice of Open Meeting

    The Materials Processing Equipment Technical Advisory Committee 
(MPETAC) will meet on March 10, 2015, 9:00 a.m., Room 3884, in the 
Herbert C. Hoover Building, 14th Street between Pennsylvania and 
Constitution Avenues NW., Washington, DC The Committee advises the 
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration with 
respect to technical questions that affect the level of export controls 
applicable to materials processing equipment and related technology.

Agenda

Open Session

    1. Opening remarks and introductions.
    2. Presentation of papers and comments by the Public.
    3. Discussions on results from last, and proposals from last 
Wassenaar meeting.
    4. Report on proposed and recently issued changes to the Export 
Administration Regulations.
    5. Other business.
    The open session will be accessible via teleconference to 20 
participants on a first come, first serve basis. To join the 
conference, submit inquiries to Ms. Yvette Springer at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0e57786b7a7a6b205d7e7c6760696b7c4e6c677d206a616d20696178"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="613817041515044f321113080f060413210308124f050e024f060e17">[email protected]</span></a>, no later than March 3, 2015.
    A limited number of seats will be available for the public session. 
Reservations are not accepted. To the extent that time permits, members 
of the public may present oral statements to the Committee. The public 
may submit written statements at any time before or after the meeting. 
However, to facilitate the distribution of public presentation 
materials to the Committee members, the Committee suggests that 
presenters forward the public presentation materials prior to the 
meeting to Ms. Springer via email.
    For more information, call Yvette Springer at (202) 482-2813.

    Dated: February 12, 2015.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-03322 Filed 2-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1190 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure equal access 

of Medicare beneficiaries to community pharmacies in underserved areas 

as network pharmacies under Medicare prescription drug coverage, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 5, 2015 

Mrs. CAPITO (for herself, Mr. MANCHIN, Mr. COTTON, and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure 

equal access of Medicare beneficiaries to community 

pharmacies in underserved areas as network pharmacies 

under Medicare prescription drug coverage, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Seniors Ac5 cess to Local Pharmacies Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1190 IS

1 SEC. 2. ALLOWING ANY WILLING PHARMACY SERVING AN 

2 UNDERSERVED AREA TO BECOME A NET3 WORK PHARMACY UNDER MEDICARE PRE4 SCRIPTION DRUG COVERAGE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1860D–4(b)(1)(B) of the 

6 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–104(b)(1)(B)) is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘DISCOUNTS ALLOWED FOR

9 NETWORK PHARMACIES.—For’’ and inserting the 

10 following: ‘‘DISCOUNTS ALLOWED FOR NETWORK

11 PHARMACIES.— 

12 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—For’’; and 

13 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

14 clause: 

15 ‘‘(ii) INCLUSION OF PHARMACIES LO16 CATED IN UNDERSERVED AREAS IN NET17 WORKS.—In the case of a prescription 

18 drug plan that has, in its network of phar19 macies, one or more pharmacies located in 

20 a health professional shortage area (as de21 fined in section 332(a)(1)(A) of the Public 

22 Health Service Act), in a medically under23 served area (according to a designation 

24 under section 330(b)(3)(A) of the Public 

25 Health Service Act), or among a medically 

26 underserved population (as defined in such 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1190 IS

1 section 330(b)(3)(A) of such Act), and 

2 that provides a reduction in coinsurance or 

3 copayments described in clause (i) for cov4 ered part D drugs dispensed through such 

5 pharmacies, such plan shall extend to any 

6 pharmacy located in such area or among 

7 such population the option to be an in-net8 work pharmacy with respect to such plan 

9 under terms and conditions (including the 

10 reductions described in clause (i)) com11 parable to those the plan has agreed upon 

12 with other in-network pharmacies located 

13 in such area or among such population.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to plan years beginning on or after 

16 January 1, 2016. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
• •

•

•

.1.-1.4.sv - • " 1106151,18"" 

").

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

WASUNGTON

Onnac or Ms umet INICRenUtY NNW •

21 November 1983

MEMORANDUM FOR GENERAL MARTIN

SUBJECT: Contact Between Dr. Wheelon and Colonel Battle

•

Colonel Battle called this 'afternoon to ask if he could see me

briefly on a "matter of mutual interest. " I went to see him immediately; he advised that Dr. Wheelon. and Mr. Bross had visited

him on 20 November, and he wanted to "clear his skirts with us. "

Dr. Wheelon said they would discuss CORONA and MURAL

matters. When Colonel Battle pointed out that he had been debriefed,

he was told, "Don't worry about that; as of now you're cleared -

we'll handle that. " After a discussion of the "mess the program

is in at Los Angeles," Wheelon'asked Battle's reaction to Dr.

McMillan's proposal to place all of CORONA under General Greer

(Battle advised me that this put him on the spot, because he wasn't

sure of the ylim of the proposal, even though Wheelon had surfaced

the what). Battle replied with a long resume of how Mr. Bissell

supported the program, stressing the fact that knowledge, confidence,

and support were much more important than ownership. He asked

Wheelon and Bross if they had ever visited Colonel Charley Murphy's

place; if they knew what he did, if they knew the Murphy (i. e. ,

Agency) role in CORONA operations, etc. Both Wheelon and Bross

admitted never having made the trip.

Colonel Battle's key point was that a Program Manager (like

Colonel Worthington) needs trust, confidence, and backing, such as •

Battle always had from Bissell. In such an atmosphere, technical.

problems are faced as incidents, not as crises. ("Anxiety will

never replace thrust, " etc. ) •

Colonel Battle said it was clear to him that Dr. Wheelon is not

at all sure how Mr. McCone will vote on Dr. McMillan's proposal.

Additionally, he feels he may have held his audience, but he doubts

if there were any converts.

le .4/1

Ccatal Srtel

imumielone1, USAF

CORONA/MURAL

*AGE- -011- -PAGES

SAPSS‘eacf.42.:=1.4
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1





                          CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Dynamex Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "COMPANY"), on Form 10-K for the period ended July 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),
Richard K. McClelland, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Ray E.
Schmitz, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ RICHARD K. McCLELLAND
------------------------------------------
Richard K. McClelland
President and Chief Executive Officer
October 29, 2002




/s/ RAY E. SCHMITZ
------------------------------------------
Ray E. Schmitz
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
October 29, 2002


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                        REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                         ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE




To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Object Design, Inc.:

Our report on the consolidated financial statements of Object Design, Inc., is
included on page 17 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In connection with our
audits of such financial statements, we have also audited the related financial
statement schedule for each of the three years in the period ending December 31,
1996, listed in the index of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
present fairly, in all material respects, the information required to be
included therein.




                                                     COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Boston, Massachusetts
February 11, 1997
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                         CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
                                     OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies as of September 30, 2003 to the UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 to the best of my knowledge, as follows:

1.  The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Intelligent Systems Corporation for the
    quarter ended September 30, 2003 which accompanies this statement fully
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  Information contained in such quarterly report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
    Intelligent Systems Corporation.



Date:  November 13, 2003              /s/ Bonnie L. Herron
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                          Bonnie L. Herron
                                          Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION - CEO

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Plains Resources Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
John T. Raymond, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To the best of my knowledge, after reasonable investigation:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 13, 2003.



| | /s/ John T. Raymond
John T. Raymond
Chief Executive Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report
or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
#### Guell (Carl), Respondent, vs. Rusch, Appellant. Guell (Frieda), Respondent, vs. Rusch, Appellant. [Two notices of appeal.]

For the appellant: *Hannan, Johnson & Goldschmidt*of Milwaukee, and *John A. Thiel*of Mayville, attorneys, and *Martin R. Paulsen*of counsel, of Milwaukee.

For the respondents: *C. P. Keck*of Fond du Lac, and *A. W. Lueck*of Beaver !Qam.

*By the Court.*

Judgments affirmed.
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 14

- 00579

- CR

MAYRA FLORES , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
Appeal from the 339th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1280239 ).

This Court today considered a motion for rehearing filed by appellant, Mayra
Flores. We order that the motion be denied and that this Court’s former judgment of June 11, 2015, be vacated, set aside, and annulled . We further order that this Court’s opinio n of June 11, 2015, be withdrawn

.
This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on March 31, 2014. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that the tri al court’s judgment contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.
Judgment rendered July 30, 2015

. Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Massengale. Opinion delivered by Justice Higley.
#### J. N. UZZLE v. THE COMMISSIONERS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY.

"Where a plaintiff holds a debt against a county, contracted since the adoption of the Constitution for the ordinary and necessary expenses of the county, and where the county has the means to pay the debt, such plaintiff is entitled to a peremptory mandamus, and it was error in tire Court below to refuse it.

*(,Street*v. *Commissioners of Craven; Horton*v. *Commissioners of Jones; Edwards*v. *Commissioners of Wilkes,*at this term; and *Pegram*v. *Commissioners of OTeavdand,*04 N, C. Rep. 557, cited and approved.)

Civil action, tried before Waits, *J.,*at the Fall Term, 1873, of the Superior Court of Franklin county, upon the following .agreed state of facte.

1. That the debt sued for by the plaintiff, the amount of which is fixed by the judgtnentin this action, to-wit; $2138.61. was for the necessary and ordinary expenses of the county government.

2. That the tax levied by the State is twenty cents on the one hundred dollars worth of property, and that the defendants have levied a tax for county purposes of forty cents on the one hundred of property, or double the amount of the State tax.

3. That the current expenses of the county government for ¡the year amount to about six thousand dollars ; that the taxes .assessed and levied on the property of the county for county ¡purposes, amount to about eleven thousand dollars.

*5654. That the sheriff of the county, acting with the approval and authority of the defendants, is receiving county scrip in payment of these taxes,

5. That the county of Franklin was indebted in the sum of at least §15,000 at. the time of the adoption of the State Constitution ; that since that time $10,000 of this debt has been paid out of the county taxes.

A special tax of about $6,000 was levied in 1869.

Upon the foregoing, state of facts, bis Honor refused the peremptory *mandamus*asked for by the plaintiff, whereupon the plaintiff appealed.

*Goolee <& Spencer*and *Merrimon <& Ashe,*for plaintiff.

*Davis*and *Battle*cb *Son,*contra.

Reads, J.

There was error in refusing the *mandamus.*The case shows that the defendants have ample means with which to pay the plaintiff’s debt. The current expenses of the county are $6,000. The tax list will raise $11,000, which leaves a surplus of $5,000. Why may not that pay the debt? We infer from what is stated (it is not plainly stated) that this surplus is applied towards the payment of the ante-war county debt. There is no necessity for this; because, although that debt has to be paid, yet a tax to pay that debt may bo levied without regard to equation or limitation. And that would leave the surplus of the present tax to be applied to the plaintiff’s debt.

. The questions involved have been considered and decided in several cases at this term, and need not be further elaborated. *Street*v. *Comm'rs of Craven Horton*v. *Comm’rs of Jones; Edwards*v. *Comm'rs of Wilkes.*And see *Pegram*v. *Comm'rs of Cleaveland,*64 N. C. R. 557.

This will be certified to the end that a peremptory *mandamus*may issue, &c.

Pee Cubiam. Judgment reversed.
# C_2005106EN.01002402.xml

| 30.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/24

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 1 March 2005

in Case T-258/03 Andreas Mausolf v European Police Office (Europol) (1)

1

(Temporary staff - Europol staff - Non-extension of employment contract)

(2005/C 106/55)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case T-258/03: Andreas Mausolf, a former member of the staff of Europol, residing in Leiden (Netherlands), represented by F. Baltussen, P. de Casparis and D.C. Coppens, lawyers, against the European Police Office (Europol), the seat of which is at the Hague (Netherlands) (Agents: D. Heimans and K. Hennessy-Massaro, and, at the hearing, N. Urban) — application for annulment of Europol's decision not to extend the term of the applicant's contract of employment and for compensation for the loss allegedly suffered — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and I. Pelikánova, Judges; J. Plingers, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 1 March 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 213 of 6.9.2003.

1

---
putt' or Security

USAF

CONTROL NO Intel

COPY OF COP

PAGE 1 OF 1 PA.

,

IV-SECRET- .• • AO

1 .

THE NRO STAFF

•

WASHINGTON. D.C.

23 May 1979 

Dell

)

-IQ-NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

MEMORANDUM FOR TEE STAFF

SUBJECT: riefings

We are having increasing difficulty keeping track of

the personnel who are accessed for NRO programs and studies.

A primary reason for this is the reluctance of NRO Staff

personnel to have those they are briefing complete a briefing

oath. The requirement whenever non-NRO Staff personnel are briefed for n rograms or studies, an oath

must be completed. The dual must provide any information required and must sign the oath. This policy applies

to all personnel, with the exception of only a few VIP's.

Concerning VIP's within DOD, the DOD/DIA policy is that

only a few people fall into this category, i.e., Secretary

of Defense, Deputy Secretary of Defense, the Chiefs and Vice

Chiefs of the four services, and the Director and Deputy

Director of DIA. That's it.

Many of you are hesitant to ask a general officer or

high ranking civilian to complete and sign an oath. Any

temporary alleviation of embarassment this may provide will

be more than offset when that individual shows at

sting and no record can be found that he holds the

access(s) to attend. One other thing you need to

remember is that we must confirm an individual's security

eligibility to receive new briefings. The fact that they

hold other compartmented accesses is NOT a sufficient

determination of eligibility. Please1t us ascertain their

eligibility before they are briefed. We can do it quickly

and it may keep all of us out of a jam later.

We solicit your cooperation and will be happy to provide

any assistance.
FIRST M & F CORPORATION

**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of First M&F Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hugh S. Potts, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| A.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of   Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                     |
| B.     | The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of the Company. |

Date:  May 10, 2006

|   | /s/ Hugh S. Potts, Jr.               |
|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   |                                      |
|   | Hugh S. Potts, Jr.                   |
|   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of UltraGuard Water Systems Corp. (the
  "Company " ) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
  the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
  John R Gaetz, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                            
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: April 14, 2005

/s/ John R GaetzJohn R Gaetz 
  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---