alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

STEVEN JOSEPH PEAVEY
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3958

[ September 9, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.

Lucie County ; Charles A. Schwab , Judge; L.T. Case No.

562018CF003468A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Benjamin Eisenberg, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Celia Terenzio,

Assista nt Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Appellant Steven Peavey appeals his judgment and sentence following a plea. We affirm the judgment and sentence but remand for correction of the written sentencing orders to conform with th e trial court’s oral
pronouncement.

Appellant entered an open plea to burglary of a conveyance (count one) and grand theft (count two). The trial court orally sentenced him to three years in prison on count one and five years of probation on count two, with the probation to be served consecutively to the sentence on count one. However, the court entered a written sentencing order incorrectly reflec ting that it imposed a split sentence and a written probation order incorrectly reflecting that it imposed prison time to be served during the term of probation.

On remand, the trial court shall amend the written orders to reflect that it did not impose a split sentence or prison time to be served during the term of probation. See Williams v. State , 957 So. 2d 600, 603 (Fla. 2007)2 (recognizing that the court’s oral pronouncement of a sentence controls over an inconsistent written sentencing document); Ray a v. State , 183 So. 3d 1120 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) ( affirming the convictions and sentences in

an Anders appeal but remanding for correction of a scrivener’s error in the written sentencing order ). Appellant need not be present for this

ministerial action.

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

G ROSS

, C IKLIN and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-22-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                           4,573
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,335
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,701
<INVENTORY>                                     18,833
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               107,788
<PP&E>                                          39,839
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,760
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 367,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,502
<BONDS>                                        194,114
<COMMON>                                           320
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,971
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   367,849
<SALES>                                        423,870
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               423,870
<CGS>                                          254,127
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  254,127
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,273
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,682
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,018
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,706)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,312
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
.• • . BE MEOW 310 3811730 . • •

aff /00001 ES DO •

P 271725Z

S E c R T25Z OCT 76

IR=

/MOLE v CL SYRON OILY

BRIG MN SHIELD9f1.02. CILLINANE

Y REPORT TO ICB

Se/191587Z OCT 76

1. REQUESTED, TIE MOUND DIFOINAT ION IS

1110I MID BEGIRDING E. 0. 11 985 DIPLIMENTATION V ITHIN

MOMS Co

A. =NARY OF ACTD/ITY D1RDI8 PERIM

SEVERAL wocrims (4) ME BEEN NW WITH MOWERS

CF. YOUR STAFF TO II ISMS L ao 1 1985 MO S DIPLOMAT /0No

A PRILDI MARY FLAN VAS SUELITTED IN MIX JUT. SUBSUME

MINCE OF IBM 18 REMIXED IN ARTIER RNIIOI OF

ffiel VEC AINZE1 PROVIDED TIERED& AN AllILYSIS OF

ISSID 18 DIPLICATION VAS PROMED BY NSA IN MO AND

IESILTED IN REVISION OF OUR DIPLOMAT= PLAN. A

ROWAN C DIRECTIVE HAY BEEN PREPARED IN CONJUNCTION

WITH YOUI STAFF AN) AFTER COM DEMON W ITHIN PROEM C

CPS ISSUED ON 27 OCT 1976.

7-• B. I /CREW CERTIFY THAT THERE HAVE BUN ID KNOWN

. EREACHES OF L 0. 1 1%15.

Coo I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT All. PROEM! C DOMESTIC

sena Re AID CALIBRKT ION TEST REOUBUDIENTS HAIM BEEN

ODOM= WITHINHE EXCEPTION CATE= IES OF WSW 18,

. K9DE D. PARA 1.3. THERE HAVE BEEN NO WM INADVERTENT

COLLECTIONS AN) MILD SUM COLLECTION TAKE PLACE IT

WILL BE IIMEDIATELY DESMOYED MD NOT EXILOITIO.

*2 DUVET

1SEORET

1 $

`

"!r+' 7":C' Crt. i

N
--------------

• ti

AD!AJCXD RICOMMISSANCN MINN PUND3M3

---)11I 7L, DISDOVELVatiallanff) 

FISCAL 1NAR(S) lCaLIONS

SUSIVIAL GNAW TO2AL

MILLIONS ‘MILLIONS

1946-59' 236.7

1946-53 1.5

1956

1957 (131

10.4 8.9 _

3.9

10.0 620

13.9

3.958

7.6 geti

1.6 313

9 .5.5

63..3.

19591'

ABM Order No. 9-58 136.2

ArPA Order No. 41.59 0

=AS (4rpa Order No. 38-59) .75

AP Super "G" 3.355 (620)

Biomedical 1.2 (684)

151.3

ilThru January 1959
( \3 ey

wen

a

H It is desired that you have a
plan prepared to acde;

pliel this purpose, and that it be sub-
mitted to the Weapons Board with the least delay.

ROSCOE Cc, WILSON
Lieutenant General

Deputy Chief of Starr,
Development
PRESBNUATON GUtMAZY
—e

BY: HQ AFBMD

SUBJECT: SAMOS, Revised Development Plan
PURPOSE:

1. To present the Outline of a revised development plan for SAMOS.
This plan was originally presented to various echelons of Hq USAF and

the Department of defense during July 1960 in accordance with guidance
contained in:

a. AFDSD letter “Exploitation of Initial SAMOS Data" dated 1 Jun
1960. This letter outlined guidance which had been received from the Under
Secretary of the Air Force, we sage ee oe *

b. DOD/RE staff Stuay (Dr. Billings) dated 13 Jun 1960. this is
& carefully documented appraisal of the SAMOS Program and the national
requirements for satellite reconnaissance.

to the Proposed SAMOS Development Plan and this presentation consolidates
that guidance.

FACTS:

2. Further guidance was received fran Hq USAF on 23 July 1960 reievant

3. The present SAMOS R&D Development Plan was approved in Js
1960. That program is not now in consonance with later guidance referred
to above and Consequently must be changed. The "in being” program has
been given every consideration in Planned realignments to insure no
degradation of effort during the process of realignment and augmentation.

ASSUMPTIONS:

4, It is believed that this:presentation now reflects the desires of

the Air Force and the Department of Defense and is therefore suitable for
review by the AFEMC again at this time.

DISCUSSION:

\ a ae



6 August 1960
6. SAMOS ana MIDAS. had Previously planned to Jointly fund additional
TRA ‘sites if earlier proposed Operational Development Plans were approved.
SAMOS . guidance Precludes the addi:

‘tion of such facilities at this time,
therefore, any MIDAS Operational Development Plan must assume complete
funding ‘by MIDAS, oe,

RECOMMENDATIONS:
EGS:

8. Recommend the actions delineated in the attached Presentation be
implemented as S00n as possible, These are summarized as follows:
a.

D. Approve and release the requisite additional funds at the
earliest possible date.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-618
In Re: MARLON BRAMWELL, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-91-429-A) Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: October 17, 1997 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marlon Bramwell, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Marlon P. Bramwell has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel a district court reporter to supply him withmissing pages of a transcript for which he has already paid. Because Bramwell now has the material he seeks, we deny his petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
SCPR

- 24

- 0000 510

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

IN RE CATHY LEE SEKIGUCHI

, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN IN GOOD STANDING

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna

, Eddins , Ginoza

, and Devens , JJ. )

Upon consideration of the petition to resign from the

practice of law in the State of Hawai ʻ i, filed by attorney Cathy

Lee Sekiguchi (Petitioner), pursuant to Rule 1.10 of the Rules

of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai ʻ i (RSCH), which the

court construes as also seeking to retain the paper license as a

memento, as authorized by RSCH Rule 1.10(b), and the

declarations submitted in support thereof, we conclude that

Petitioner has complied with the requirements of RSCH Rule 1.10.

Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition to resign is

granted. Petitioner may retain the paper license as a memento. Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPR-24-0000510

06-AUG-2024

11:41 AM

Dkt. 4 OGP2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g)

that Petitioner shall comply with the notice, declaration, and

record requirements of RSCH Rule 2.16(a), (b), (d) and (g).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the

name of Petitioner, attorney number 3224 , from the roll of

attorneys of the State of Hawai ʻ i, effective with the filing of

this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, August 6 , 2024.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ V la dimir P. Devens
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
VINSON TREMAYNE JOHNSON,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. DAVID SHINN, Director, Director of the A.D.O.C.R.R. at Central Office; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 21

- 15954
D.C. No. 2:21

- cv - 00080

- GMS

- JZB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding Submitted December 14, 2021 * *
Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. Vinson Tremayne Johnson, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due process claims arising from a disciplinary hearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 21 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 1 5954

Nordstrom v. Ryan , 762 F.3d 903, 908 (9th Cir. 2014). We reverse and remand. The district court dismissed Johnson’s due process claims on the ground that the sanctions imposed on Johnson through the disciplinary pro ceeding finding him guilty of arson did not implicate Johnson’s constitutionally protected interests. However, Johnson has a protected property interest in the $500 penalty levied against him. See Shinault v. Hawks , 782 F.3d 1053, 1057 (9th Cir. 2015) ( no ting
that an inmate’s account funds are a protected property interest )

. Moreover, Johnson alleged that the arson conviction resulted in a twelve

- month term of
maximum

- security custody, involving solitary confinement for over twenty

- three hours each day wi th almost no interpersonal contact and denial of most privileges afforded inmates in the general population. See Brown v. Or

. Dep ’ t. of Corr

. , 751 F.3d 983 , 987

- 99 (9th Cir. 2014) ( concluding a protected liberty interest existed
where two

- year term of detention in solitary confinement was imposed on a prisoner as a sanction for misconduct). Liberally construed, these allegations are sufficient to warrant ordering defendants to file an answer. See Hebbe v. Pliler , 627 F.3d 338, 342 (9th Ci r. 2010) (explaining that “where the petitioner is pro se, particularly in civil rights cases, [courts should] construe the pleadings liberally
and [ ] afford the petitioner the benefit of any doubt” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted) ) ; see al so Wolff v. McDonnell , 418 U.S. 539, 566

- 69 (1974) (prisoner must be allowed to call witnesses and present documentary3 21

- 1 5954

evidence in his defense during disciplinary proceedings, unless limited exceptions apply). Johnson’s motions for appointment of counsel ( Docket Entry No. 4), injunctive relief pending appeal (Docket Entry No. 5), and to expedite (Docket Entry Nos. 14 and 15) are denied as moot.
REVERSED and REMANDED
.
NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE RECONNAISSANCE PROGRAM

Washington, D. C.

July 13, 1970

NRP EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

AGENDA

Office of Deputy Secretary of Defense

Room 3E 928, The Pentagon

Friday. July 17, 1970

2 - 5 p.M.

The NRP FY 1971 Financial Program Dr. McLucas

and Related FY 1972 through 1976 

Cost Estimates 

Reference A. Director's Report to the NRP Executive Committee

0131970 Status and FY 1971 Program

015-70

Reference B. The NRP FY 1971 Financial Program and Related lif72 through 1976 Cost Estimates

2945-70, dtd JUly 7, 1970

F. Robert Naka

Secretary

-T011-SECRET--

IMMOIte tea. 100110•14 gotellaellst

NO SWIMS NM t. SIMI MI &Mt
IEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM

July 13, 1970

41111

1 3019-70. NRP ExCom Agenda.

tachnents. One page.

Copy 1 Mr. Packard, DOD

2 Mr. Helms, CIA

3 Dr. DuBridge, ROB

4 Dr. Foster, DDR&E

5 Mr. Moot, OSD Comp.

6 Adm. Gayler, NSA

7 Mr. Schlesinger, BOB

via Mr. Sorrels

8. Mr. Froehlke, DOD

9 Mr. Duckett, CIA

10

11

12

Working copies

Allen

McLucas

BF

SS-5

SS-4

Naka (2)
JEFFREY E. STARLING

,

Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 1 6

- 1 235

___ __________________________/

Opinion filed October 4, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Terry P. Lewis , Judge.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Steven Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, A.

Victoria Wiggins, Assistant Publi c Defender, and Kasey Helms , Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant

.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Llanes , Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee

, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

KELSEY, WINOKUR, and WINSOR, J J

. , CONCUR.
Exhibit 32.2
                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer

     Pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  created  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, the  undersigned  officer of Tanger GP Trust,  sole
general   partner  of  Tanger   Properties   Limited   Partnership   ("Operating
Partnership") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

          (i) the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Operating
     Partnership  for the quarterly  period ended March 31, 2005 (the  "Report")
     fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
     applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (ii) the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Operating Partnership.

Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.

Dated:   May 10, 2005         /s/ Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.
       -----------------      --------------------------------------------
                              Frank C. Marchisello, Jr.
                              Treasurer & Assistant Secretary of Tanger GP Trust
                              Sole General Partner of the Registrant
# C_2004273EN.01000902.xml

| 6.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/9

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 16 September 2004

in Case C-423/03: Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Non-transposition - Directive 2001/18/EC)

(2004/C 273/17)

Language of the case: Finnish

In Case C-423/03, Commission of the European Communities (Agents: U. Wölker and M. Huttunen) v Republic of Finland (Agent: T. Pynnä) — action brought on 3 October 2003 under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations — the Court (Fourth Chamber) composed of: J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, (President of the Chamber), K. Lenaerts and K. Schiemann (Rapporteur), Judges, Advocate General: M. Poiares Maduro; Registrar: R. Grass, has given a judgment on 16 September 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations, and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations, and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Finland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Finland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 275 of 15.11.2003.

1

---
| 1.   | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September      30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ending September 30, 2008 fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates      presented and the results of operations of the  Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ John X. Adiletta         |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| John      X. Adiletta        |   |
| Chief      Executive Officer |
| Chief      Financial Officer |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>          0001004539
<NAME>         AIRPLANES LIMITED
<MULTIPLIER>     1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              207
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        42
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (16)
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    232
<PP&E>                                            4,104
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1,345
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3,029
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               153
<BONDS>                                           3,407
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (1,416)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3,029
<SALES>                                               2
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    242
<CGS>                                                (1)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       114
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      8
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      7
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  205
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (102)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         (3)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (105)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (105)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0



</TABLE>