alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
May 7, 2012 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

D c 1- ofT~ J ('(1 '?- cJ-:2 ocr 

l\1/:[JL} 

STEVE RosENTHAL, MAYOR 

101 Front Street • P.O. Box 269 

Indianola, Mississippi 38751 

Office: 662.887.1825 

Fax: 662.887.6009 

Cell: 662.207.0684 

coimayor@bellsouth.net 

The City of Indianola, Mississippi wishes to lend its support to the proposal of Silver Airways to provide 

essential air service at Greenville, Ms as replacement for current Delta Air Lines service. 

Local air service that provides an effective connection to the national and international air 

transportation system is critical to the economic well being of the entire Mississippi Delta. 

The Silver Airways proposals offers the best proposal for air service out of Greenville, Ms. The size and 

type airplane as well as service to Atlanta makes this the most logical choice for service. 

I believe the Silver air service proposal is our best option to have consistent, dependable and convenient 

service for the Delta. 

1/we urge the Department of Transportation to award Silver Airways the designation to provide 

Greenville, MS and the Mississippi Delta essential air service. 

Best regards, 

Steve 

~if~ Rosenthal
Argued and submitted May 28,

affirmed July 14,

reconsideration denied September 29,

petition for review denied November 30, 1993 (318 Or 98)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*JASON O’DELL HUGHES, *Appellant.*

(CF91-0222; CA A72414)

855 P2d 667

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Janet A. Metcalf, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Ann Michelle (Micky) Feusse, Certified Law Student, Salem.

Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*676PER CURIAM

Pursuant to plea negotiations, defendant pled guilty to two counts of robbery in the first degree and two counts of kidnapping in the second degree, ORS 164.415; ORS 163.225, and the state dismissed four other counts. He challenges the consecutive sentences imposed on the kidnapping convictions, arguing that there was no evidence to support the court’s finding that the commission of kidnapping was not merely incidental to the robbery. ORS 137.123.

We do not address defendant’s assignment of error. There is no review of a sentence that has resulted from an agreement, as defendant’s sentence did here. ORS 138.222 (2)(d); *State v. Adams,*315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993); *State v. Tanner,*121 Or App 104, 854 P2d 941 (1993); *State v. Kilborn,*120 Or App 462, 852 P2d 935 (1993); *State v. Johnston,*120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1196 (1993).

Affirmed.
May 24,2012 

Aloha Ley 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, W86-310 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Ms. Ley: 

I support the City of Abilene's request for a Small Community Air Service 

Development Grant to improve air service at Abilene Regional Airport. 

As an under-served airport, ABI is requesting funding to subsidize new 

service with an additional airline. 

Your approval of the grant proposal, resulting in additional air service 

for our region, would provide: 

• Increased customer choices by adding non-stop service from 

ABI to an additional airline hub airport 

• Increased route opportunities and capacity 

• Reduced average fares paid by passengers using ABI 

• Reduced leakage to other airports in the region 

I respectfully request your favorable action on Abilene Regional 

Airport's grant application.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Brendan Layne Jenkins, * From the 220th District Court

of Comanche County,

Trial Court No. CR04529.

Vs. No. 11-22-00243-CR * December 21, 2023

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
ALMADEN MINERALS LTD.





List of Subsidiaries







|                                     |                       |                         
|------------------------------------ | --------------------- | ------------------------
|Name                                 | Date of Incorporation | Jurisdiction            
|                                     |                       |                         
|                                     |                       |                         
|Minera Gavilan, S.A. de C.V.         | 09/17/1996            | Mexico                  
|Compania Minera Zapata, S.A. de C.V. | 02/26/1998            | Mexico                  
|Almaden de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.      | 11/10/1992            | Mexico                  
|Republic Resources Ltd.              | 10/02/1987            | British Columbia, Canada
|                                     |                       |                         
|                                     |                       |                         





#
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<MULTIPLIER>       1
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                            1,571,325
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          4,510,147
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        31,963
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                             4,478,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           4,510,147
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,521
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            68,714
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (46,193)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (46,193)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        (46,193)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (0.01)                    <EPS-DILUTED> 
                         (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
‘ORIG, OR REFERS-TO ae

REFERENCE

‘TyeEe (er saps nAMe ANDY ue

; se AT 3 YEAR Ty
pecaser AFTER eo



“374.19 SEC.

“187.16. BEC



| DATA INDICATE THAT:
, 46 NM (NOMINAL 106: a3

(NOMINAL: 10, 074 FPS).
NRO/OPA [10063] ID 2.22

Grow and lead an empowered, 

engaged, and inclusive faster to stay ahead 

of adversaries

Deliver Bolster

 space-based 

intelligence, surveillance, and 

reconnaissance

to execute the mission in a 

challenging environment

Cultivate mission-enhancing

Foster a culture of equity, 

inclusivity, innovation, and 

teamwork

Promote workforce wellbeing 

through innovative approaches 

and state-of-the-art 

technologies

Attract and recruit a dynamic, 

diverse, and dedicated team 

Develop and retain a joint 

military and civilian workforce 

with the skills and expertise to 

overcome the challenges of 

tomorrow

Integrate disruptive and 

high-payoff technologies 

and practices, to include 

commercial products 

and services

Accelerate acquisition 

timelines and innovation 

adoption

Invest in the technology 

of tomorrow

Incentivize creativity 

in everything we do

Advance anticipatory collection 

operations through automation 

and multi-INT processes 

Enhance overhead tasking, 

Collection, and data processing 

capabilities to tackle the targets 

of tomorrow

Apply advanced technologies and 

techniques to accelerate data 

delivery to the user for missions 

such as sensor-to-shooter activities

Improve life-cycle affordability, 

integration, and operational 

availability of end-to-end NRO 

missions

Build in resilience through 

diverse approaches, to include 

disaggregation and proliferation of capabilities in multiple 

orbital regimes 

Increase end-to-end 

survivability and robustness by 

reducing single points of failure 

and addressing vulnerabilities

Protect, defend, and secure 

NRO functions, systems, 

and information

Anticipate, detect, and adapt 

to future threats across all 

domains

Promote and strengthen interagency partnerships to advance national 

interests and increase collective 

stewardship of the 

terrestrial and space environment

Identify and expand 

mutually-beneficial initiatives 

with international partners

Strengthen unity of effort with the 

warfighter to meet the challenges 

of the dynamic battlespace

Expand partnerships with the private 

sector and academia to efficiently 

optimize NRO talent, tools, and 

effectiveness

WORKFORCE

INNOVATE RESPONSIVE 

& AGILE

RESILIENCY PARTNERSHIPS

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Willis, Annunziata and Overton Argued at Alexandria, Virginia

GREG E. MOXNESS

v. Record No. 0449-95-4 MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY JUDGE JERE M. H. WILLIS, JR. ELAINE D. MOXNESS DECEMBER 29, 1995

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY William D. Hamblen, Judge Alan K. Arden (Pfitzner, Morley & Stephens, on brief), for appellant. Timothy T. Szabo (Szabo, Quinto, Zelnick & Erickson, P.C., on brief), for appellee.

Noting that based on the parties' actual incomes, the guidelines set forth in Code § 20-108.2 prescribed a presumptive support obligation for Ms. Moxness of $422 per month, the trial court noted that there were factors in the case justifying a deviation from that presumptive amount. It noted that the evidence supported an imputation to Ms. Moxness of an income equal to the salary that she had most recently drawn prior to her early retirement from military service. It noted that her retirement and consequent ability to care for the children saved the parties the costs of providing day care for the children. The trial court ruled, ". . . these matters cancel themselves out, it's a wash. I've done it a couple of different ways. . . . [I]t yields four twenty-two in my view, four hundred and twenty-

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.- 2 - two dollars. . . . I think it's appropriate from the evidence in this case. Four twenty-two." The record supports this conclusion. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed

.
n‘:

4.1 I141"...

rr 11015,E0Mbryfigigjoskt 

_.11/t

t
•

.6. 11 AL•10

03
44..•,‘;Se

•o',111;4,11'
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1006/2006

of 30 June 2006         

fixing, for the period 1 July 2005 to 31 March 2006, the aid for unginned cotton for the 2005/06 marketing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the Act of Accession of Greece, and in particular Protocol 4 on cotton (1) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1051/2001 of 22 May 2001 on production aid for cotton (2), and in particular Article 2(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the period 1 July 2005 to 31 March 2006, the amounts of the aid for unginned cotton corresponding to the world market prices established in the Regulations listed in the Annex hereto are fixed in that Annex from the date of entry into force of the Regulations concerned.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 June 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)  Protocol as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1050/2001 (OJ L 148, 1.6.2001, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 148, 1.6.2001, p. 3.

(3)OJ L 210, 3.8.2001, p. 10. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1486/2002 (OJ L 223, 20.8.2002, p. 3).

(4)OJ L 164, 16.6.2006, p. 3.

----

ANNEX

AID FOR UNGINNED COTTON

----

(1)OJ L 170, 1.7.2005, p. 51.

(2)OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 71.

(3)OJ L 175, 8.7.2005, p. 15.

(4)OJ L 177, 9.7.2005, p. 34.

(5)OJ L 183, 14.7.2005, p. 78.

(6)OJ L 189, 21.7.2005, p. 34.

(7)OJ L 200, 30.7.2005, p. 72.

(8)OJ L 208, 11.8.2005, p. 18.

(9)OJ L 216, 20.8.2005, p. 10.

(10)OJ L 226, 1.9.2005, p. 9.

(11)OJ L 234, 10.9.2005, p. 7.

(12)OJ L 245, 21.9.2005, p. 17.

(13)OJ L 256, 1.10.2005, p. 31.

(14)OJ L 266, 11.10.2005, p. 56.

(15)OJ L 271, 15.10.2005, p. 38.

(16)OJ L 273, 19.10.2005, p. 16.

(17)OJ L 276, 21.10.2005, p. 33.

(18)OJ L 288, 29.10.2005, p. 50.

(19)OJ L 295, 11.11.2005, p. 8.

(20)OJ L 302, 19.11.2005, p. 34.

(21)OJ L 315, 1.12.2005, p. 6.

(22)OJ L 324, 10.12.2005, p. 25.

(23)OJ L 335, 21.12.2005, p. 38.

(24)OJ L 342, 24.12.2005, p. 69.

(25)OJ L 6, 11.1.2006, p. 29.

(26)OJ L 17, 21.1.2006, p. 13.

(27)OJ L 27, 1.2.2006, p. 16.

(28)OJ L 32, 4.2.2006, p. 43.

(29)OJ L 40, 11.2.2006, p. 12.

(30)OJ L 49, 21.2.2006, p. 6.

(31)OJ L 59, 1.3.2006, p. 42.

(32)OJ L 62, 3.3.2006, p. 21.

(33)OJ L 72, 11.3.2006, p. 14.

(34)OJ L 82, 21.3.2006, p. 7.

----
8 FS FILE

Classification. Automatically Cancelled

When Separated From Attachment. '

Com

'

'.1

104 TIT

..,„ ,.n 

,..,:tia.....",t...jilka

SECURITUCLASSIFICATION

P

'

)

. -

'.- 4..

CONTROL NUMBER:

DS 60-2612

Copies •

A 1

••• AL....k 1. ' .,..,.. ‘• • -, '•%"•:' ''' .`.4

. ARM-MS:- VI-St.-

VP .w 40.'4,—

7 ''

.

1

; ' .

SAFi

belle Regents. Rev.

SAFMA

•

Dep. Proc. &Prod.

Suspense

Dep. Civ-Mil.A/T

Action

BIS

...

Deo. WMt NY • ' Info c

.

.

. The attached document

returned to the Correspondence

is controlled and must be

Control Division

or file. All personnel

SAFFM affix their signature below.

for transfer destruction

afforded access will

Dep.Asst.Sec. Fin.Mgmt.

. .

Dep.Con. Fin. ' - REGISTER

ture i

Date Signature • Date

SAFRD

SAFMP

peo. MP & Org. nP••••••••••nn

Dep. Sec. Progs.

. REMARKS'

b

noted by the

Pude? Sec

Of tbe L:

.

•

Dep. Res. ROTC

SAFAA

SNMIC

sArm

SAFIE • Security Classification

.

•

MIN

Routed by: ,

, .

tj : Gunn

MIr 

., "- Mail Brandi

SAFLL

AFCCS

SAFS FILE

SAF Form 16 (Rev Feb 691 ..

-01

4
•

HEADQUARTERS ED STATES MR FORCE

Office of the Daps Allief of Staff, Development

Date 3 Aitatust 1960 

MEMO FOR. Under Secretary of the Air Forme

Attached is a copy of wire indicating

the action taken on the Eastman Kodak

Project.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

CASH WRIGHT AND JASMINE WRIGHT (ADULT DAUGHTER),

Petitioners

v.

STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY,

EDWARD B. RUST AND DELORIS

BRYANT,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 221 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of December, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1330 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1330

To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to prohibit discrimination on 
account of sexual orientation or gender identity when extending credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 2015

  Mrs. Murray (for herself, Mr. Franken, Ms. Warren, Mr. Merkley, Mr. 
Booker, Mr. Schatz, Mr. Markey, Mrs. Shaheen, Ms. Hirono, Ms. Baldwin, 
 Mrs. Feinstein, and Mrs. Boxer) introduced the following bill; which 
 was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 
                             Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to prohibit discrimination on 
account of sexual orientation or gender identity when extending credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Freedom from Discrimination in 
Credit Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION ON ACCOUNT OF SEXUAL 
              ORIENTATION OR GENDER IDENTITY.

    Subsection (a)(1) of section 701 of the Equal Credit Opportunity 
Act (15 U.S.C. 1691) is amended by striking ``on the basis of race, 
color, religion, national origin, sex or marital status,'' and 
inserting ``, actual or perceived, on the basis of race, color, 
religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or 
marital status,''.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

    Section 702 of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (15 U.S.C. 1691a) 
is amended--
            (1) by striking subsections (f) and (g); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new 
        subsections:
    ``(f) The term `gender identity' means the gender-related identity, 
appearance, or mannerisms or other gender-related characteristics of an 
individual, with or without regard to the individual's designated sex 
at birth.
    ``(g) The term `person' means a natural person, a corporation, 
government or governmental subdivision or agency, trust, estate, 
partnership, cooperative, or association.
    ``(h) The term `sexual orientation' means homosexuality, 
heterosexuality, or bisexuality.
    ``(i) Any reference to any requirement imposed under this title or 
any provision of this title shall be deemed to include a reference to 
the regulations of the Bureau under this title or the provision of this 
title in question.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Anonymous.

The plea of *plene administranit*shall be received at all times, provided the Defendant does not come in with it at a very late period, to delay the trial.

This suit had come from the County Court by appeal; which was taken for this cause, that after the suit had depended foe some time upon the general issue, the Defendant’s counsel moved to putin the plea *of plene admin-istravit;*which was opposed there, and now at the bar of this court, because if the plea could be now put in, the consequence would be, that a Defendant might, adminis- ' ter his assets after being served with process, and then come in and defeat the Plaintiff by such a plea.

*Fe)’ curiam*

Plene *administravit,*whenever put in, relates to the day of service of the writ ; at least it must state, that on the day of exhibiting the Plaintiff’s demand by writ, the Defendant had fully administered ; or at least that the writ was first served on such a day, before which day he had no notice, and that before that day, he had fully administered, &c. This plea should be received at all times, provided the Defendant does not come in with it at a very late period, and thereby delay the trial; otherwise the Defendant might be subjected to pay the debt out of his own estate, when perhaps he had in fact no goods t« be administered on, wherewithal to pay it. The plea was admitted.

Note.— *Vide Sawyer*v. *Sexton’s Adm’r.*2 *Hay. 67. Reid*v. *Hester; Con. Rep.*488.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2254 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2254

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 16, 2017

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2635 Napa Street in Vallejo, California, as the ``Janet Capello Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JANET CAPELLO POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2635 Napa Street in Vallejo, California, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Janet Capello Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Janet 
Capello Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 10, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollar
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                             19,195 
<SECURITIES>                                            0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                      71,514 
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0 
<INVENTORY>                                             0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  110,410 
<PP&E>                                            123,533 
<DEPRECIATION>                                     68,624 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,021,849 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             303,094 
<BONDS>                                           618,370 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0 
<PREFERRED>                                             0 
<COMMON>                                        3,831,215 
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,730,830)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,021,849 
<SALES>                                           511,640 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  511,640 
<CGS>                                             522,873 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     522,873 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    9,634 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  3,503 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (24,370)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (24,370)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0 
<CHANGES>                                               0 
<NET-INCOME>                                      (24,370)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.002)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.002)
                                               

</TABLE>