alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.9

                              CLARK-SCHWEBEL, INC.
                            1998 EXECUTIVE BONUS POOL



Attached is the 1998 Executive Bonus Plan as submitted by management and
recommended by the Compensation and Benefit Committee.

1.     The plan is based on EBITDA. From $0 - $29.9M EBITDA, the pool is $0K, or
       Board discretion. A table is attached that reflects the % of bonus pool
       earned at various levels of EBITDA up to $56M or 125% of pool.

2.     A secondary pool of 10.0% would be set aside to reward management members
       outside the incentive plan. (In the past, these awards have been
       recommended by the responsible Vice President, based on individual
       special performance.)

3.     The plan participant pool would be split between earned @ 70% and
       discretionary @ 30%. Payout of the discretionary portion would be
       determined by the appropriate Vice President and President, based on
       individual goals and performance against those goals.

4.     There will be five levels of participation ranging from 40.0% to 120% of
       annual base salary based on level of responsibility.

5.     The bonus allocation pool will be calculated by multiplying the base pay
       (W-2 base pay) of each individual by their level of participation and
       totaling. The earned bonus of 70% is then allocated to participants based
       on the allocation pool while the 30% discretionary portion is based on
       individual's performance as determined by their respective manager.
















<PAGE>   2

                              CLARK-SCHWEBEL, INC.
                               BONUS POOL SCHEDULE

                                                               POOL: $2,055K

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   $000
                               %                                  EARNED
EBITDA                        POOL                                 POOL
------                        ----                                 ----
<S>                           <C>                                 <C>   

0 - 29.9                      BOARD DISCRETION
30.0                                      25.0                    $  514.0
37.0                                      50.0                    $1,028.0
44.0                                      75.0                    $1,541.0
50.0                                     100.0                    $2,055.0
56.0                                     125.0                    $2,568.8
</TABLE>


PARTICIPATION LEVEL AS A % OF BASE SALARY

PLAN LEVEL        I.       120%
                  II.      100%
                  III.      80%
                  IV.       60%
                  V.        40%
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05112241 

TOP SECRET 

;sf' NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

11111111111111111111111\ii 14 

111\11\11111\ .,.,, 

BYEMAN' 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

THE NR0 STAFF February 19, 1969• 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

MEMORANDUM FOR OASD/SA 

SUBJECT: OSD Management of Intelligence Programs 

This responds to your memorandum, BYE 77871-69, dated 

February 12, 1969. 

We disagree completely with your thought that the management of the National Reconnaissance Program requires, or would 

be enhanced by, "normalization. 11 

Preliminaries to this notion were first advanced by ~-----~ 

in BYE 5511-66, dated August 30, 1966. After discussion with Secretary Vance, Dr. Flax replied in BYE 52621-66, dat~.d October 31, 

1966. When Secretary Nitze replaced Mr. Vance, a formal proposal 

for "normalization" was advanced (seel l's BYE 70011-68, "-~ 

dated April 23, 1968) and, after discussions with Dr. Flax, Secretary·· 

Nitze disapproved the proposal in BYE 78176-68, dated July 6, 1968. 

Our position with respect to your current version of these earlier 

proposals for "normalizing" the NRO is identical to that expressed in 

the previous re0plie s to ~------~ 

Since your proposal discu~ses the applicability of the Target 

Oriented Display as a management device, you should also refer to 

Dr. Flax's memorandum to Secretary Nitze, BYE 13146-68, dated 

June 18, 1968, which points out the weaknesses of the TOD as well 

as the dangers of using it as an analytical tool for the National Reconnaissance Program. 

)1,') 

2 . • WORTHMAN 

Colonel, USAF 

Deputy Director 

CONTROLNOBYE 12608-69 

TOP s ECR ET COPY </: " OF_COPIES 

EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES 

000 DIRECTIVE !5200.10 DOES NOT APPLY 

. j _________________________ .... ________ .2o;z~J?=00? 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05112241
#### Sanderson, Appellant, vs. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Company, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Hoyt, Bender, Trump, McIntyre & Hoyt*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Hayes, Coleman, Darnieder & Hayes*of Milwaukee, attorneys, and *W. A. Hayes*of Milwaukee and *Henry Lockney*of Waukesha, of counsel.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
·c . ...:..-.>_· _~ ____ • __ ...•. . •. _ .. -:"-'" ......... _..,..,_ ........ ~~''-'' .~._ .. _ ...... 

ILA-/~ .. ,,'~ c.I 

([ 

-

([ 

'. 

\ ..... ./. 

_ _ ~.,..~'~ ~'.' __ '"'!'-"~: "' .. ' "_ NRO APPJlOVED FOR RELEA~ ,>/.:..,... 

.l ""~ '- ~'" .,:_. DECLA~FIED BY: C/IART " 

DECLASSIFIED ON: 9 JULY 2012 

AGENCY 

i 

!';~:T:SLLl G EN CE . '-,-..1 .... 

\ 'JAcull:::'(· .. ·_,·""'s C C ..., .. o· ..... ·,""""v-.......- • •• 

Evaluation of QUILL Feasibility 

Demonstration 

~. This memorandum is in response to yours of 

3 Fe~~ua~y 1935, subject as above. It is my understanding 

that we were to raceive a ~ompr~hens~ve briefing on the 

QUILL SYS"._3 and ~~ would seem timely now that this should 

be s~heduled. 

2. ! agree that ~nalysis of the potential value to 

i~telligence of this source is an appropriate com~lement 

to the engineering analysis which you advise is now under 

way. ~ete~mir.ation of the precise auspices unde~ which 

thi3 analysis is conducted should await a fuller understanding on our part of the factors involved. 

~.' 

Marshall S. Carter 

Lieutenant General, USA 

Deputy Director 

BYE #008L~-65 . 

Copy ~--pf 9
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München by order of that court of 1 February 2005 in Household of Jörg and Stefanie Wollny v Finanzgericht Landshut

(Case C-72/05)

(2005/C 93/26)

Language of the case: German

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Finanzgericht München (Germany) of 1 February 2005, received at the Court Registry on 15 February 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Household of Jörg and Stefanie Wollny and Finanzgericht Landshut on the following question:

----

(1)OJ L 145 of 13.06.1977, p. 1.

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

GREGORY E. THOMPSON, § No. 425, 2014

§

Respondent Below, § Court Below:

Appellant, §

§ Family Court of the 

§ State of Delaware, in and for

v. § Kent County

§

DIVISION OF FAMILY § File No. 12-10-1TK

SERVICES, §

§ Petition No. 12-32909

Petitioner Below, §

Appellee. §

§

Submitted: April 22, 2015

Decided: April 23, 2015

Before STRINE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and VALIHURA, Justices.

O R D E R

This 23rd day of April 2015, the Court, having considered this matter 

on the briefs of the parties, and having concluded that the same should be 

affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Family Court in its 

Order of July 9, 2014;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment 

of the Family Court be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

 Justice
IB 

Union Calendar No. 128 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2258 

[Report No. 115–189] 

To require that certain standards for commercial driver’s licenses applicable 

to former members of the armed services or reserves also apply to 

current members of the armed services or reserves. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2017 

Mr. AGUILAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

JUNE 23, 2017 

Additional sponsors: Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Mr. COOK, Mr. ROUZER, Mr. 

SIRES, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. HUFFMAN, Ms. BROWNLEY of California, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mrs. BUSTOS, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. YOUNG of 

Alaska, and Mr. KNIGHT

JUNE 23, 2017 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on May 1, 2017] 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2258 RH

A BILL 

To require that certain standards for commercial driver’s 

licenses applicable to former members of the armed services or reserves also apply to current members of the 

armed services or reserves. 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2258 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Active Duty Voluntary 

5 Acquisition of Necessary Credentials for Employment Act’’ 

6 or the ‘‘ADVANCE Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. COMMERCIAL DRIVER’S LICENSE STANDARDS FOR 

8 SERVICE MEMBERS AND VETERANS. 

9 Section 31305(d) of title 49, United States Code, is 

10 amended— 

11 (1) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘VET12 ERAN OPERATORS’’ and inserting ‘‘SERVICE MEM13 BERS, RESERVISTS, AND VETERANS’’; 

14 (2) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ‘‘subpara15 graph (A) during’’ and inserting ‘‘subparagraph 

16 (A)— 

17 ‘‘(i) while serving in the armed forces 

18 or reserve components; and 

19 ‘‘(ii) during’’; and 

20 (3) in paragraph (2)(B), by inserting ‘‘current 

21 or’’ before ‘‘former’’ each place the term appears. 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 128 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2258 

[Report No. 115–189] 

A BILL 

To require that certain standards for commercial 

rent members of the armed services or reserves. the armed services or reserves also apply to curdriver’s licenses applicable to former members of 

JUNE 23, 2017 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE         

No 42/2006

of 28 April 2006         

amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Chapter I of Annex I to the Agreement shall be amended as follows:

Article 2

The texts of Regulations (EC) No 1053/2003, (EC) No 1128/2003, (EC) No 1139/2003, (EC) No 1234/2003, (EC) No 1809/2003, (EC) No 1915/2003, (EC) No 2245/2003 and (EC) No 876/2004 in the Norwegian language, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 29 April 2006, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 28 April 2006.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

R. WRIGHT            

----

(1)OJ L 92, 30.3.2006, p. 17.

(2)OJ L 152, 20.6.2003, p. 8.

(3)OJ L 160, 28.6.2003, p. 1.

(4)OJ L 160, 28.6.2003, p. 22.

(5)OJ L 173, 11.7.2003, p. 6.

(6)OJ L 265, 16.10.2003, p. 10.

(7)OJ L 283, 31.10.2003, p. 29.

(8)OJ L 333, 20.12.2003, p. 28.

(9)OJ L 162, 30.4.2004, p. 52.

(10)OJ L 306, 7.12.2000, p. 32.

(11)OJ L 2, 5.1.2001, p. 32.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

----
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 12:36 PM 

To: Richard Parker 

Cc: Alex Hofmann; Andrew Delaski; Aris Marantan; Art Rosenfeld; Bob Saint; Brian Coffey; Bruce Smith; 

Caitlin Johnson; Carlos Gaytan; Caskey, John; Charlie Drexler; Charlie Stevens; Chris Bolduc; Clark Silcox; 

Creevy, Jim; Dan Cohen; Daniel Young; Eric Peterson; Freeman, Jeremiah; Gary Fernstrom; Greg 

Coulter; Greg Rosenquist; Hirsch, Bruce R; James Lass; Jennifer Tiedeman; Jerry Corkran; Jerry Hodge; 

Jerry Schoen; Joanna Mauer; John Cymbalsky; John Rossetti; Katie Coughlin; Ken Winder; Mahesh P. 

Sampat; Matt Miller; Matthew Nardotti; Meg Waltner; Meyers, Aaron; Michael Hyland; Michael Rivest; 

Millure, Dave; Phil Harter; Phil Hopkinson; Polinski, Raymond; Puesh Kumar; Richard Parker; Rick 

Anderson; Rob Greeson; Robert Berman; Robert van Buskirk; Robin Roy; Ryan, Paul; Scott Beck; 

Simmons, Chuck; Steve Nadel; Steve Rosenstock; Tim Ballo; Tom Eckman; Wes Patterson; Zhimei Luo 

Subject: Comments on Supply and Competitiveness 

As requested, please find attached our comments regarding 1) core material supply and 2) core material 

competitiveness. 

Confidentiality Notice 

This message is intended exclusively for the individual or 

entity to which it is addressed and may contain privileged, 

proprietary, or otherwise private information. 

If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized 

to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or 

any part of it. If you have received this message in error, 

please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete 

all copies of the message.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

SEPTEMBER 20, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-11751

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 95-00132-CR-WS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

ABEL ROCA-OLMOS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

_________________________

 (September 20, 2007)

Before DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

William Gregory Hughes, appointed counsel for Abel Roca-Olmos, has filed
2

a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our

independent review of the record confirms counsel’s assessment of the relative

merits of the appeal. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no issue of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Roca’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-15805, 333-45026, 333-62020, 333-106569 and
333-106570) of Aware, Inc. of our report dated March 13, 2006 relating to the
consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule, management's
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
this Form 10-K.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 14, 2006
•

IOP a •

:.• •

•

NRO CHARTER CONSIDERATIONS

4

I

The Role of the NRP ExCom.

The NRP ExCom was established, and composition of its

membership determined, by Presidential direction in 1964. The

ExCom acts for the Secretary of. Defense and is established to:

Recommend to the Secretary of Defense the overall

appropriate level of effort for the NRP in responding to requirements in light of technical capabilities and fiscal limitations.

Approve or modify the consolidated NRP and its

budget.

c. Approve the allocation.of responsibility and the

associated funds for R&D for new systems.

The ExCom hasivcently been compoied of the DCI, acting as

Chairman, and the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Intelligence)

wto represents the Secretary of Defense. In years past, the

committee included the President's Scientific Advisor until that

position was abolished. The Assistant Secretary of Defense

(Intelligence) replaced the Deputy Secretary of Defense who was

Chairman until 1971. Recently, consideration has been given

to a member representing the National Security Council.

The Role of the DNRO. •

By a DOD/CIA Agreement and DOD Directive, the DNRO is •

responsible for the day-to-day management and conduct of the

NRP. The'NRP is based upon a single charter which makes its

mission unambiguous. The NRO is a separate operating agency

of the DOD and can make use of DOD services. The DNRO's role

in the NRP can be considered analogous to that of a corporate

president of a company.

External to the NRO: Developing the corporation analogy,

the respon of directors level" composed of

three parts. In the first part, the bNRO looks to the

Secretary of Defense for policy guidance and decisions since

AilliLr•OS00

WA Of

SSW 111111•MalY, es MO NI

ATTACHMENT 2

aNITRAIIIWYZE16

copy 1

PAGe__Lor, 2 PAGES

•• •:: • •• •• • _
•

•

•

•

the Secretary of Defense is the NRP executive agent. In the

second part, the DCI, through the US.IB mechanism, provides

to the DNRO national requirements which NRP space systems

should fulfill. And third, the DNRO receives program resource

allocation directives from the ExCom. as well as direction as

to the pace to be maintained regarding various projects within -.

the NRP.

Internal to the NRO: The DNRO has an interagency staff

and .hrrtIrl sowTompand three Program Offices to aid him: oThr

His line organizations (in the corporation analogy--and military

sense--too) report directly to him. The variety of managerial

tools that he has to fulfill his responsibilities are unique

and essential (streamlined management) in order for the NRP to

continue to fulfill its role effectively and efficiently.

•

•

••••••••

cals••• mows@ alP

tiiileveme nous Newsom's te

NNW Mit elis&Nov ••• se

CCINI °. 1111114 '''' BAGEL

•

PAUL ...LW 76 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>                        5
<MULTIPLIER>                     1
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                     MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                           730225
<SECURITIES>                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                    82061 
<ALLOWANCES>                     0 
<INVENTORY>                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 812286
<PP&E>                           30985047
<DEPRECIATION>                   30263924
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   1533409
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            208527
<BONDS>                          0               
<COMMON>                         0   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0
<PREFERRED>                      0
<OTHER-SE>                       1324882
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     1533409
<SALES>                          242943
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 242943
<CGS>                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    0 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  147935
<INCOME-TAX>                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              147935
<DISCONTINUED>                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  0
<CHANGES>                        0
<NET-INCOME>                     147935
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                    .00
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
 
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
 
<MULTIPLIER>1
       
<S><C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>DEC-31-1997
<CASH>650,003
<SECURITIES>1,048,689
<RECEIVABLES>431,501
<ALLOWANCES>39,346
<INVENTORY>1,140,165
<CURRENT-ASSETS>4,246,624
<PP&E>3,646,702
<DEPRECIATION>1,599,880
<TOTAL-ASSETS>11,529,832
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>2,712,540
<BONDS>3,787,281
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>0
<PREFERRED>0
<COMMON>323,495
<OTHER-SE>3,918,892
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>11,529,832
<SALES>3,056,859
<TOTAL-REVENUES>11,907,625
<CGS>2,850,146
<TOTAL-COSTS>2,850,146
<OTHER-EXPENSES>0
<LOSS-PROVISION>0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>404,134
<INCOME-PRETAX>2,153,727
<INCOME-TAX>631,402
<INCOME-CONTINUING>1,522,325
<DISCONTINUED>0
<EXTRAORDINARY>0
<CHANGES>0
<NET-INCOME>1,522,325
<EPS-PRIMARY>.52
<EPS-DILUTED>.51
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,160
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   81,069
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,207
<PP&E>                                         129,128
<DEPRECIATION>                                  81,685
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 545,374
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          559,918
<BONDS>                                          2,415
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,968,715
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,985,674)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   545,374
<SALES>                                        470,310
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               470,310
<CGS>                                          240,113
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  439,355
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,161
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,445
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,349)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,349)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,349)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.001)
        

</TABLE>