alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.9




             NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER SALARY AND BONUS ARRANGEMENTS

         On November 16, 2004, the Compensation Committee of Community Central
Bank Corporation (the "Corporation") approved the base salaries for 2005, cash
bonuses for 2004 and incentive stock option grants for the named executive
officers of the Corporation, all as set forth in the following table:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          2005        2004 Cash           Shares of
Executive Officer              Title                      Salary       Bonus            Stock Options
-----------------              -----                      ------       -----            -------------
<S>                        <C>                            <C>         <C>               <C>
David A. Widlak            President and CEO
                           Community Central
                           Bank Corporation               $258,750    $31,250               12,000


Ronald R. Reed             President and CEO
                           Community Central
                           Bank                           $181,125    $22,500                6,000


Ray T. Colonius            Treasurer and CFO
                           Community Central
                           Bank Corporation and
                           Community Central Bank         $124,200    $12,500                5,000
</TABLE>


         Bonuses paid and stock option grants awarded to the named executive
officers are at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation
Committee will review the named executive officer's individual performance as
well as the Corporation's and Bank's overall performance in making bonus and
stock option grant determinations, but does not look at any particular factor to
make its determination. As a general guideline, the Compensation Committee
establishes a total bonus pool equal to approximately ten percent of a
minimum-targeted net income base, which is set by the Compensation Committee at
the beginning of the fiscal year. The actual amount of money in the total bonus
pool may be increased or decreased at the end of the year at the discretion of
the Compensation Committee.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CORPORATE CONTROLLER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of ATSI Communications, Inc. on Form 10-K for
the period ending July 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Antonio Estrada Jr., Sr. VP of Finance &
Corporate Controller and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C, ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,





1)
            the
      Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2)
            the
      information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and result of operations of the
    Company.





By /s/
Antonio Estrada Jr.


Antonio
Estrada Jr.


Sr. VP of
Finance & Corporate Controller and


Principal
Financial Officer


October
15, 2009
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C.  SECTION 1350)








In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Aware, Inc. (the “Company”)
for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, to the
best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Michael A.
      Tzannes
            
            /s/ Keith E.
      FarrisChief Executive
      Officer
            
            Chief Financial
      OfficerDate:  February
      15, 2008
            
            Date: February 15,
      2008







The certification set forth above is
being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as
a separate disclosure document of the Company or the certifying
officers.
“ailother syetems, at the same time, ; ‘ ;
ci The Staff Study, therefore, starts out with Ph intcntng the defining 1
for a reconnaissance eztellite, Ite : aah ‘ be 2 saa
to be solved by sucha device and which problems ibe solved. ne
by other specialised systems, This section rit guectiocs as the , ,
number of satellites required to affect the surveillanch of Points and
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 879/2006

of 15 June 2006         

amending the rates of the refunds applicable to certain milk products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the markets in the milk and milk products sector (1), and in particular Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The rates of refund fixed by Regulation (EC) No 782/2006 are hereby altered as shown in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 16 June 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 June 2006.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN            

Vice-President

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

(2)OJ L 138, 25.5.2006, p. 1.

----

ANNEX

Rates of the refunds applicable from 16 June 2006 to certain milk products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty (1)

----

(1)  The rates set out in this Annex are not applicable to exports to Bulgaria, with effect from 1 October 2004, to Romania with effect from 1 December 2005, and to the goods listed in Tables I and II to Protocol No 2 the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 exported to the Swiss Confederation or to the Principality of Liechtenstein with effect from 1 February 2005.

----
#### Luebke, Respondent, vs. Danaher and wife, Appellants.

*April 2*

May *8, 1928.*

*Appeal and-err or: Affirmance by divided court.*

Where the Justices of this court are equally divided in opinion upon the question involved in an appeal, the judgment appealed from will be affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: Gustave G. Gehrz, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Action begun September 4, 1926; judgment entered July 14, 1927. Action for specific performance. Judgment in favor of the plaintiff, from which defendants appeal.

For the appellants there was a brief by *Roehr & Steinmetz*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Chris Steinmetz.*

*H. H. Bodenstab*of Milwaukee, for the respondent.

Rosenberry, J.

Those participating in the decision of this case are equally divided in opinion as to whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed. Under such circumstances the judgment must of necessity be affirmed in accordance with the rule.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
#### Glaesser, Appellant and respondent, vs. Dukes, Respondent, and Anderson, Respondent and appellant. (Two appeals.)

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee county dated December 28, 1926-: Otto H. Breid-enbach, Judge.

Personal injury. Automobile collision. Judgment for plaintiff against *Anderson,*from which *Anderson*appeals. Judgment in favor of defendant *Dukes*against plaintiff, from which plaintiff appeals.

For the appellant and respondent *Glaesser: Wolfe & Ko-linski*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent and appellant *Anderson: Shaw, Mus-kat & Sullivan*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent *Dttkes: Rubin, Zabel & Rouiller*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed on both appeals.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

MICROS SYSTEMS, INC.

 

Certificationof Principal Financial Officer

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

I, Gary C. Kaufman, Executive Vice President of Finance andAdministration and the Chief Financial Officer of MICROS Systems, Inc. (“Registrant”),certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004 of the Registrant(the “Report”):

 

(1)       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

(2)       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 

 
|   | /s/ Gary C. Kaufman |             |
|--------|---------------------|------------------|
|   | Name:               | Gary C. Kaufman  |
|   | Date:               | February 9, 2005 |
|        |                     |                  |  |  |

 

----
anew Internal

••41

TOVSECREF

tel- NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

THE NRO STAFF

23 June 1967

MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD

SUBJECT: De-Control of "the fact of". Satellite Reconnaissance

mgr. Reber saw Mr. Helms on 20 June and briefed General

Del Dr. Flax, and me today on his experiences. He said that

after talking for about three minutes he was challenged by the

DCI, who said, "Just what terrible things will happen to the NRO

if this decontrol goes through? I've had a whole series of special

pleaders march through telling me the world is going to end. What

specific problems do you see, Jim?" To which, Mr. Reber says

he had no reply.

Dr. Flax told us, then, that he had seen Mr. Vance yesterday

and had briefed him, hurriedly, on the disclosure problem. Mr.

Vance said that change was inevitable, that "this too must change, II

and that we must learn to accommodate to change. Dr. Flax

interprets this as perhaps being based on "a signal from the White

House. " He then told Mr. Vance that NRO management would

certainly be much more cumbersome outside theillillilienvirmunent. Mr. Vance looked surprised and said, "The management must not be allowed to change. "

There is a consensus that there is no point in fighting this

problem. I do not understand how the defeatist attitude developed.

We have not one shred of hard data re Restow, "the White House, "

or inexorable forces beyond our control. Yet, there seems to be

an air of relief on the part of persons who advance this hypothesis.

is the community actually tired of shoring urstalaasecurity?

Is five years best one can expect as the lifetime of any special

security arrangement? What are the motives/pressures?

Nib 40P- /1SEGRET- Munn ,101111WIC SIGISLIMNS

SOS SISICIwit S!OO II SOLE Net LOWLY
• TOP-SECRET

This has been a baffling month, on the security front. Perhaps -

the next move should be via NASC or Kohler to the summit; it

would certainly be the final move!

De

PA . WORTHMAN

Colonel, USAF

TOP-SEC-REF-

[Mum Few ageosavic Doe

NO IMMUCTIVE SIN IS IOU WI APPLY

awe« IN 

Internal

POW

Plagn.,.neg
## Find Your Local Service Center

    USDA Service Centers are locations where you can connect with Farm Service Agency, Natural Resources Conservation Service, or Rural Development employees for your business needs. Enter your state and county below to find your local service center and agency offices. If this locator does not work in your browser, please visit offices.usda.gov.  

If these results are incorrect, please send corrections to: oip@usda.gov
SUPPLEMENTAL BASISSTATEMENT CHAPTER 129SURFACE COATING FACILITIES

January 6, 2011 Commenters 1 . Anne Arnold Region 1 EPA Boston, Mass. 2 . Dave Darling American Coatings Association (ACA) Washington, DC

General 1 . Comment : Maine's proposed revisions to Chapter 129 are consistent with EPA's VOCcontent limits given in the Control Technique Guideline (CTG) for flat wood paneling and metal furniture coating operations issued in 2006 and 2007, respectively. However, Chapter 129also includes emission limits for miscellaneous metal parts and products coating operations for which EPA issued an updated CTG in 2008. Therefore, Maine should also update the Chapter 129 miscellaneous metal and plastic parts coating emission limits to reflect the 2008 CTG . (commenter 1) Response: The Department is aware that Chapter 129 must be updated to incorporate the Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings CTGlimits. The Department expects the miscellaneous metal andplastics parts 2008 CTGwill affect a larger group of sources andplans to incorporate this CTG at a later date when more time can be given to notifying stakeholders . Emission limits 2 . Comment : It appears that Maine is proposing more stringent limits in Table 1 and Table 2 for surface coating ofmetal furniture. Specifically, Maine is proposing limits lower than the EPA CTGfor Metallic and Pretreatment Coatings (3 .0 lb/gal versus the EPA CTG3.51b/gal for baked and air dried coatings) . In addition, 5.1 lb/gal versus the CTG limit of 6.7 lb/gal for baked and air dried coatings expressed in terms of mass of VOCper volume of solids applied. It is difficult to track each and every state surface coating rule, as such ACAhas been asking States to adopt limits as consistent as possible to the EPA CTG

. ACArequests Maine adopt the EPA CTG limits for the Metallic and Pretreatment Coatings . (commenter 2) Response: The Department accepts the commenter's suggestion to use the EPA CTG limitsfor Metallic and Pretreatment Coatings (3 .5 lb/galfor baked and air dried coatingsexpressed in terms of VOC per volume ofcoating and 6 .7 lb/galfor baked andair dried coatings expressed in terms ofmass of VOC per volume ofsolids applied) . The Department requested and received informationfromthe American Coatings Association that estimates the general one component andgeneral multi-component make up approximately 70%

ofthe coatings used in metalfurniture, with extreme high gloss and extreme performance combinedfor 10%, pretreatment 10%, metallic 5% and the remaining categories 5% oftotal coatings used. The Department agrees that the larger categories (one component and multi-component general use coatings) that are more stringent than the current rule more than off-set the relaxation in the specialty coatings.
EXHIBIT 23.2


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



The Board of Directors:
Profile Technologies, Inc.


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 333-53575) on Form S-3 of Profile Technologies, Inc. of our report dated
September 9, 2005 relating to the balance sheet of Profile Technologies, Inc. as
of June 30, 2005 and the related statements of operations, stockholders'
deficit, and cash flows for the year then ended June 30, 2005, which report
appears in the June 30, 2005 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Profile
Technologies, Inc.

     Our report dated September 9, 2005 contains an explanatory paragraph that
states that the Company has incurred cumulative losses and had negative working
capital of $2,349,380 at June 30, 2005, that raise substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include
any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.


                                          /s/  Peterson Sullivan


Seattle, Washington
September 26, 2005
roved for Release: 2018/11/16 C051151 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

C.',] 

, ..... 1;\ 

20 November 1970 

MEMORAlifDUM FOR DR. McLUCAS 

SUBJECT: TAG BOARD Status 

tli 

A total of twenty (,20 TAG BOARD drones remain in the 

inventory. 

Six (6) are operational at Beale AFB Calif. 

THO (2)· B-52H aircraft carry-out platforms are operational 

at Beale. 

Authority has been granted for an operational mission over 

South China. Earliest date for this launch is 22 Nov 1970. 

Potentially the operating characteristics of TAGBOARD offer 

an excellent supplement to satellite coverage of crisis and 

strategic reconnaissance targets. 

Note: 

- ...... ,~ ~-'.1 . 

i. ; ~ • ~j rl 

~~J 

Speed: 3.3 Mach 

AU: 85-95000 Ft. 

Radar Cross Section 

(Res) ''-----____ __ 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C051151 

BYE-12383-70 

Cy Jj} of 2 Cys 

Pglof 1 Pg
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certificate of Principal Financial Officer

pursuant to section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of CNET Networks, Inc. (CNET
Networks) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report), I, George E. Mazzotta, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CNET Networks, certify pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CNET Networks.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 16, 2006



|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|/S/    GEORGE E.
MAZZOTTA                                              
|George E. Mazzotta Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CNET Networks and
will be retained by CNET Networks and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 15.6

April 30, 2013

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549-7561

Dear Sirs/Madams:

We have read
the information required by Item 16 F of Form 20-F dated April 30, 2013 of SK Telecom Co., Ltd. and have the following comments:



| | 1. | We agree with the statements made in the paragraphs two, three, four and six in the section Change in Registrants Certifying Accountant on pages 121
and 122.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | We have no basis on which to agree or disagree with other statements of the registrant contained therein.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yours sincerely,

/s/ Deloitte Anjin LLC

Seoul, Korea
# C_2005116EN.01000101.xml

| 18.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 May 2005

(2005/C 116/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2636 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,52 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4430 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68735 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2260 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5430 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 83,29 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0956 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5770 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 30,270 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,98 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6960 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2133 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 120 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,50 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,075 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7460 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6701 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6049 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8552 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7823 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0934 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 269,41 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,1124 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,4582 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3150 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 909,43 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,802 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 68,658 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,3750 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,371 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2636

JPY

Japanese yen

135,52

DKK

Danish krone

7,4430

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68735

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2260

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5430

ISK

Iceland króna

83,29

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0956

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5770

CZK

Czech koruna

30,270

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,98

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6960

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2133

ROL

Romanian leu

36 120

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,50

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,075

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7460

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6701

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6049

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8552

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7823

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0934

KRW

South Korean won

1 269,41

ZAR

South African rand

8,1124

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,4582

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3150

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 909,43

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,802

PHP

Philippine peso

68,658

RUB

Russian rouble

35,3750

THB

Thai baht

50,371

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 21

- 00218

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF U.L.

, A C HILD §

§

§

§ O n Appeal from the 360th District Court

of Tarrant County ( 360

- 680 22 4

- 20 )

November 10, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is a ffirm ed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack

Justice Dana Womack