alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**
     I, Gary C. Kaufman, certify that:
     1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of MICROS Systems,Inc. (the “Registrant”);
     2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financialinformation included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
     4.     The Registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15(e)) [*clause omitted pursuant to SECRelease Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986*] for the Registrant and we have:
               a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
               b) [*paragraph omitted pursuant to SECRelease Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986*];
               c) evaluated the effectiveness of theRegistrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
               d) disclosed in this report any change in theRegistrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
     5.     The Registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
               a) all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
               b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   /s/ Gary C. Kaufman
# C_2005137EN.01002301.xml

| 4.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/23

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3665 — ENEL/Slovenske Elektrarne)

(2005/C 137/16)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 26 April 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3665. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3665. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
#### State ex rel. Zabel vs. Board of Canvassers of Milwaukee County and others.

*December 11*— December *12, 1914.*

*State ex ret Husting v. Board of State Canvassers, ante,*p. 216, followed.

MaNDAMus action to compel the *Board of Canvassers of Milwaukee County*to complete its canvass of the returns from the various election districts in such county of the results of the election for county officers held in November, 1914, and to issue certificates of election, evidencing the result of the canvass, particularly as to the relator, IP. *C. Zabel.*

Issue was joined by demurrer to the return.

The reasons given, in the return, for delay are substantially the same as in *State ex rel. Husting v. Board of State Canvassers,*ante, p. 216, 150 N. W. 542, viz. pending proceedings for a recount under the provisions of sec. 86, Stats.

TI7. *B. Rubin*and TP. *C. Zabel,*for the relator. [No brief on file.]

*L. G. Wheeler*and *II. S. Sloan,*for the defendants. [No brief on file.]

Maeshall, J.

The question raised in manner aforesaid ■ is ruled in favor of the plaintiff by the decision in *State ex rel. Husting v. Board of State Canvassers, ante,*p. 216, 150 N. W. 542, and for the reasons which will be found stated in the opinion in that case. Following such decision the court ordered herein thus:

(1) That the demurrer to the return be sustained, and

(2) That a peremptory writ of *mandamus*issue, returnable with all convenient speed and not later than December 15, 1914, commanding that said canvassers make the statement of votes cast for county officers in Milwaukee county, file the same with the county clerk, and publish the *250results, and thaf the county clerk issue certificates of election thereon, all as provided by secs. 83, 84, and 85, Stats.; and it appearing that the time for efficient recount proceedings has expired, further ordered that all recount proceedings under sec. 86 do now cease.

Wieseow, C. T., and Baestes, J., dissent.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

                                    AMENDMENT


         Pursuant to Section 12(a) of that certain TRUST UNDER NAB GROUP - USA
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN ("Agreement") dated July 6, 2000, by and between
HOMESIDE LENDING, INC., a Florida corporation (the "Company") and SunTrust Banks
of Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Trustee"), the Agreement is
amended in the following particulars (new material in BOLD):

         Section 2(d) shall be amended in its entirety by substituting the
following:

         (d) Company may make payment of benefits directly to Plan Participants
or their beneficiaries as they become due under the terms of the Plan or Section
2(c) above. Company shall notify Trustee of its decision to make payment of
benefits directly prior to the time amounts are payable to Participants or their
beneficiaries. IN THE EVENT COMPANY MAKES SUCH PAYMENTS, COMPANY SHALL PROVIDE
SUCH PROOF AS THE TRUSTEE MAY REQUIRE THAT THE PAYMENT HAS BEEN MADE, DEMAND
REIMBURSEMENT FOR SOME OR ALL OF THE PAYMENT AND TRUSTEE SHALL MAKE SUCH
REIMBURSEMENT. In addition, if the principal of the Trust, and any earnings
thereon, are not sufficient to make payments of benefits in accordance with the
terms of the Plan and Section 2(c) above, Company shall make the balance of each
such payment as it falls due. Trustee shall notify Company where principal and
earnings are not sufficient.

Section 4 shall be amended in its entirety by substituting the
following:

         Section 4. Payments to Company

         Except as provided in Sections 2 and 3 hereof, after the Trust has
become irrevocable, Company shall have no right or power to direct Trustee to
return to Company or divert to others any of the Trust assets before all
payments of benefits have been made to Plan Participants and their beneficiaries
pursuant to the terms of the Plans.

         The effective date of this Trust amendment shall be February 1, 2001.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the foregoing Trust amendment has been duly
executed by the Company and the Trustee.


SunTrust Banks of Florida, Inc.         HOMESIDE LENDING, INC.

By:     /s/                             By:       /s/
   -------------------------------         ----------------------------------
   Dianne Garcia                           Robert W. Vick
   AVP & Trust Officer                     Senior Vice President
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2229 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2229

 To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide permanent authority 
for judicial review of certain Merit Systems Protection Board decisions 
          relating to whistleblowers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2017

Mr. Cummings (for himself and Mr. Farenthold) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 
Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period 
    to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide permanent authority 
for judicial review of certain Merit Systems Protection Board decisions 
          relating to whistleblowers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``All Circuit Review Act''.

SEC. 2. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD DECISIONS 
              RELATING TO WHISTLEBLOWERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 7703(b)(1)(B) of title 5, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``During the 5-year period beginning on 
the effective date of the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 
2012, a petition'' and inserting ``A petition''.
    (b) Director Review.--Section 7703(d)(2) of such title is amended 
by striking ``During the 5-year period beginning on the effective date 
of the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012, this 
paragraph'' and inserting ``This paragraph''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Falls Excavating Company, Respondent, vs. Wisconconsin Power & Light Company, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Bowler & Bowler*of Sheboygan.

For the respondent: *F. H. Schli'chting*of Sheboygan Falls and *Detling, Detling & Whiffen*of Sheboygan.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
#### Simac (Nick), Respondent, vs. Darrow and another, Appellants.

For the appellants: *Rouiller & Dougherty*of Milwaukee,attorneys, and *John E. Martin*of Green Bay of counsel.

For the respondent: *Frank W. Carter*of Eagle River, attorney, and *O’Melia & Kaye*of Rhinelander of counsel..

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
# C/GI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21-0569

IN THE MATTER OF G.M.P., 

# FILED MAR 2 5 2022
Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana An Alleged Incapacitated Person. O R D E R

M. R. App. P. 10(6) requires that parties filing documents with the Clerk of the Supreme Court shall use initials for individual parties in a proceeding under Title 72, Chapter 5, Part 3 (Guardians ofIncapacitated Persons). The Court has determined there are numerous references to the names of the Appellant and Appellee throughout Appellee'sbrieffiled March 24, 2022. Thus, thebrief does not comply with the referenced rule. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that within ten (10) days ofthe date ofthis Order the Appellee shall electronically file with the Clerk ofthis Court a revised briefcontainingthe revisions necessary to comply with the specified Rule andthatthe Appellee shall serve copies ofthe revised briefon all parties ofrecord; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date offiling ofthe revised brief. The Clerk ofthis Court is directed to mail a true copy ofthis Order to all counsel of record. DATED this 25th day ofMarch, 2022. For the Court,

Justice Jim Rice 03/25/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0569
S741

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

October 17, 2014

Jacynthia Bristol, Library Assistant

La Sal Library

893 Utah 46

La Sal, UT 84530

Subject: Public documents at the La Sal Library for public inspection

Dear Ms. Bristol:

The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency sent you a package containing a number of documents

regarding the McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility on the Navajo Nation Indian Reservation

near the city of Aneth, San Juan County, Utah. Two of these documents contained an error, and need

to be replaced. Please replace the following documents in the package previously sent to you with

the enclosed documents:

1. PUBLIC iNFORMATION SHEET

2. AMBIENT AIR QUALITY IMPACT REPORT & FACT SHEET

Your assistance with this matter is greatly appreciated. Feel free to contact me at (415) 947-4156 or

ke1ly.shaheerah(~epa.gov if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Shaheerah Kelly, Environmental Engineer

Permits Office

Air Division

Enclosures
# C_2005100EN.01003501.xml

| 26.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/35

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3755 — Nordic Capital/Nycomed)

(2005/C 100/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 19 April 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3755. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3755. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

HANDDOWN LIST OF JUNE 9, 2015

WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

------------------------------------------------------------------

WD76976 In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Larry Walker vs.

State of Missouri

WD77229 Jon P. Reid vs. State of Missouri

WD77554 Gilbert E. Millette vs. State of Missouri

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

------------------------------------------------------------------

WD77286 City of Kansas City, Missouri vs. Narendra T. Sharma

WD77213 State of Missouri vs. Jamauhle Doneal Brown
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of AVAX Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard P. Rainey, Vice PresidentFinance and Administration and Acting President (as such, the principal executive
officer and the principal accounting officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:



|/s/RICHARD P. RAINEYRichard P. Rainey                                                                                                        |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Vice PresidentFinance and Administration and Acting President
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
March 31, 2003

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8746-8747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03220]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Regulatory Fairness Hearing, Region III--Virginia Beach, Virginia

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA).

ACTION: Notice of open Hearing of Region III Small Business Owners in 
Virginia Beach, VA.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The SBA, Office of the National Ombudsman is issuing this 
notice to announce the location, date and time of the Virginia Beach, 
VA Regulatory Fairness Hearing. This hearing is open to the public.

DATES: The hearing will be held on Tuesday, March 24, 2015, from 10:00 
a.m. to 12:00 p.m. (EDT).

ADDRESSES: The hearing will be at the Meyera Oberndorf Library 
Auditorium, 4100 Virginia Beach Boulevard, Virginia Beach, VA 23452.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the Small Business Regulatory 
Enforcement Fairness Act (Pub. L. 104-121), Sec. 222, SBA announces the

[[Page 8747]]

hearing for Small Business Owners, Business Organizations, Trade 
Associations, Chambers of Commerce and related organizations serving 
small business concerns to report experiences regarding unfair or 
excessive Federal regulatory enforcement issues affecting their 
members.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The hearing is open to the public; 
however, advance notice of attendance is requested. Anyone wishing to 
attend and/or make a presentation at the Virginia Beach, VA hearing 
must contact Jos[eacute] M[eacute]ndez by March 17, 2015 in writing, or 
by fax or email in order to be placed on the agenda. For further 
information, please contact Jos[eacute] M[eacute]ndez, Case Management 
Specialist, Office of the National Ombudsman, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 
7125, Washington, DC 20416, by phone (202) 205-6178 and fax (202) 481-
5719. Additionally, if you need accommodations because of a disability, 
translation services, or require additional information, please contact 
Jos[eacute] M[eacute]ndez as well.
    For more information on the Office of the National Ombudsman, see 
our Web site at www.sba.gov/ombudsman.

    Dated: February 9, 2015.
Diana Doukas,
SBA Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-03220 Filed 2-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
., • t •

e,* 1- ••• . • • L:4-, • 2 r 

,4,,,„44 • 'C'••*•••'ki•i 1•1( , , , ••• ,••• • , - •y;,,,144,„; 'I,

. ••` " 4",,, • ;2. - • •

sp

; •

. •

•

.•• •

.• •

•

•

.•

•

•

0

C

x41114 • ..r.4.••n•;.•(''''

•

• '

. • •

• „• • • 4: ••• '.**4•Srl . - •

' • • • • rri....'14"

. . •. (k • •

. • :

•

• •• e•

- . . .

'

. : k • .

:

. • • • . • ••'• •: • ..

. .

. . . •

nn••••

. • •

.4„,f •':%n" •

--fss

_ 0.• , L.Ut: - '

7111AAP371

RIIKMA t•13..t.:••••• ••n •

MASA* 351116511

:• =EU SSG !. •

r'

•

r • •

:

:•• ' •

• "

v.; 

- • •

.

.

•

• rio.m.. •

o':t •

'; !o•r. f: 4;12

." . • ,..

% • % •

•

•

C

•••• • 1.

.

...

.

.

. . , .. .

1 ••• • 4•16: . n :•1' L.1C :. .... • .. . •• ol• • ....n. .1.... • ..: . . . .......'.*. •

..

• I '.• '1/41'.• .... ' ... • :.? 4i. : • ii;r •

:IA 16311 0EC • TR C I

C

:-...; ...i.'"... '.. ..4: :". - •

'... ... • - 1:, ::c::.

*—...,

i-v*:-....

.:.. •.. .:'' •:.• ::-:. . • .."•

.

.• • • • • .:. , . ..- ...t 4:. .. ....: -- :. .-...,:„' ..,.... FORt ..,.: ./.-:.::;:.;:.:.:*.-..

t • -. ; ,:.: : e 0.-I. :;. 4,.%. --4-:.%.*LZAA;:;,i-..:4....:;•:.,;::::.•-v:::t ., .

1. TIE TRAILER NAY K PRIM ILT INTERESTED . 111..STRATEDkC ... ACT I VITT.:

a VITR C E. S. is K I NG owo.os QUOTE NATI 011AL 41E01Ni CAL KANS.. -

IT HAS CANS! I TY- TO IIONI TOR SATELLITE Lome/Es

: SINCE .. THIVIt :41E. FIRST VTR,-

•

REACTION 11111::ESTAILON t•.•

2. sie NT Is our or ma QUESTION mac sorswitTs'iiekati mi.Y . HAVE USED TRAMS NATIIIIAL.TECNNICAL lEA14•.•11ITH•011t.011N

LEGIT IRATE CONCERN, HOIEVER:4E .HOULO. IV JUSTIFIED AND PRUDENT •

.• •*:. 7 •

.

• • . • •

.. • . ...-• • ...I • — ..•

. . ;• 

.

• • "Ott.*

4•V• •r•P • • • • • • •

•

RISE 2,

WRY CLOSEriONitlit TIC. TRAILER DOING A PER100.AROUND LAUNCH i••

TIIE. THE All! 1101LO SE TO NAPE SURE T ANY SI • .1.2111 ....1 % :• • ••••..:.:1 e.1-1•

*i• •

.- r.. • ••••:-.. - •

CONGER MO DISPLEASURE IS PRECEDENT SHOLLDISTAILISK;

AK .NOINTORING CIRCE MILO K COMPOSED • OF' ENO= ELIE AIRCRAFT‘..'

SIFFLENENTED • BY SNIPS 'IF NECESSARY TO PRECLUDE UNDETECTED •

SI COALS OUR I NG TIE T I IE OF I IITENEST.

. EN ALLEN AND IIE COICURS.

. • .

: •

.

'3: TIE PRECL 10 INC REASONI NO AND I APPROACH DERE DISCUSSED • II TiI d .

111

4441.11i;

01.1.r'

. 14: •

•

••• • • .••. • *•—•.• ` • • ••%.•••••Lri.ii •••••

IN
**Exhibit 12.1**
**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**                       **For the Years Ended December 31,**   **2004**  **2003**  **2002**  **2001**  **2000**   (in thousands) **Fixed Charges:**                    Gross interest expense $17,813  $15,642  $15,373  $15,034  $25,100 Interest portion of rent expense  157   129   122   46   40                    17,970   15,771   15,495   15,080   25,140                      **Earnings:**                    Income before taxes  259,416   205,999   109,586   189,404   127,743 Plus: fixed charges  17,970   15,771   15,495   15,080   25,140 Less: capitalized interest  8,358   7,300   7,975   12,042   13,739                   $269,028  $214,470  $117,106  $192,442  $139,144                      **Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**  15.0x  13.6x  7.6x  12.8x  5.5x
LMSC Aaaore?.
< 2

1G, OR REFERS TO" CLASSIFICATION |
ORIG. OF REE _ | Se Renereence

[ereoran INSTR ISTIONS| «I

caw oss)

7

of

ND rl (etaters, Prepares) >| Beebe To meno) Nem AND TRE
Wright,’ USAT wh 7 ee

Bown PRaDRs, 9 3 ree it nema
ARTE: ‘s
“ B00. : RETIN, S216

DD i van

a



ED ABOARD THE VEHICLE AT
a aot - :
LE WAS MAINTAINED IN”



iT WG, NANDENGERG.AFB,. CALIF.

ING WERE OBSERVED FROM