alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 697/2006

of 5 May 2006         

amending Regulation (EC) No 343/2006 opening the buying-in of butter in certain Member States for the period 1 March to 31 August 2006         

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 of 16 December 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards intervention on the market in butter and cream (2), and in particular Article 2 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 343/2006 is replaced by the following text:

‘Article 1

Buying-in of butter as provided for in Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 is hereby open in the following Member States:

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 6 May 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 May 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

(2)OJ L 333, 24.12.1999, p. 11. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2107/2005 (OJ L 337, 22.12.2005, p. 20).

(3)OJ L 55, 25.2.2006, p. 17. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 663/2006 (OJ L 116, 29.4.2006, p. 39).

----
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IN RE: GLYCOBIOSCIENCES, INC.,

Appellant

______________________ 

2014-1793

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,687.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JEROLD I. SCHNEIDER, Schneider Rothman IP Law 

Group, Boca Raton, FL, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOEL B. ROTHMAN. 

FRANCES LYNCH, Office of the Solicitor, United States 

Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for 

intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by SARAH E.

CRAVEN, NATHAN K. KELLEY. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 
 

 PER CURIAM (MOORE, SCHALL, and O’MALLEY, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 10, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                                          RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                                                                 For the Years Ended December 31,
                                                             ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                1998            1997           1996           1995           1994
                                                             ---------        --------       --------       --------       --------
                                                                                          (In thousands)
<S>                                                           <C>             <C>            <C>            <C>
Pretax loss from continuing operations.................       $(206,291)      $(168,056)     $(87,986)      $(17,233)      $(1,674)

Add back:
(Losses) earnings from less-than-50.0%-owned persons.              (106)          2,286         4,503          4,327           551
Fixed charges:
  Interest, whether expenses or capitalized, including
    amortization of deferred financing costs...........          56,705          43,994        22,194             30            --
                                                              ---------       ---------      --------       --------       -------

Adjusted loss..........................................        (149,692)       (121,776)      (61,289)       (12,876)       (1,123)
Fixed charges..........................................         (56,705)        (43,994)      (22,194)           (30)           --
                                                              ---------       ---------      --------       --------       -------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.....................            --                --            --             --            --
Amount of coverage deficiency..........................       $(206,397)      $(165,770)     $(83,483)      $(12,906)      $(1,123)
                                                              =========       =========      ========       ========       =======



</TABLE>
NROApPROVEDFOR 

ASF 1_11_11 Y '414 

JOINT MESSAGEFORM 

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 

RESERVED FOR COMA .CA GENT 

STIC: MOL 

Functions: MO 

Policy: MOL. 

CONPIDENTIAL 

SINGLE 

TYPE MSG 

MULTI 

X 

PRECEDENCE 

3 Nov65 23 2 3 3 an 7 

1-10. usAF CENTril • 

INFO DTG 

nom,. OSAF 

OMMISWIMMOOMOMMOP 

SPECIAL. INSTRUCTION* 

DISTRIBUTION 

• II 

TOi ALMAJCOM 

SAF-OIN 

663 FIFTH AVENUE 

NEW YORK, N.Y. AFRDC 

eO - 

-- 

5,1-r 

SAF-OIM 

219 S. DEARBORN 

CHICAGO, ILL. 

SAF-Olt 

6087 SUNSET BLVD 

HOLLYWOOD, CALIF 

CONFIDENTIAL SAF-OIPO 

ALMAJCOM 208.! 44 65 FOR: IO 

SUBJECT: Public Affairs Guidance for the Manned Orbiting Laboratory 

Tema 

I.6nn YEAR 

(MOL) Program. The following extract from OASD/PA Memo, October 29, 

on above subject is provided for your information and compliance. 

QUOTE. "At this time it is Department of Defense policy that public 

statements with regard to MOL will not be volunteered. Certain 

releases will be promulgated, as approved by the Assistant 

Secretary of Defense (PUBLIC AFFIARS), as program milestones occur. 

National level press queries will be referred to ASD(PA) for 

PHONE, 

e: 79835 

Am MAO TITLE 

T HERMANN 

MAJOR, USAF 

SAF-OIPC 

SSE E. STAY 

AA A 

I

E p

' 

'R 

TegAISIES‘pielAIMANE AND T 

Chief, Public Information Division 

Office of Information 

REGRADINGINSTRUCTIONS 

*A0p,AIMA111..IMM,R 
N 

- RELEASE 1 11.1.0'20EBREVIAT

.`URIT.Y CLASGIFICAT 

ED JC t MESSAGEFORM • Le4T4346.TeeNREeiNu. 

and/or-CONTINUATION SHEET: 

0 ,,. 

PRECEDENCE I RELEASED MY . •ORAFTED BY 

,ROBERT MANN, MAJOR 

PHONS 

'E.2!LDUTINE SAF.01PC INFO 

3 ii0V LJ L . 

'IS AF COHN CENTER 

--1 

oimeempes Wie1 reielhoili be Ii iries 411 be deense4 Ile %We 

;aggregate of material provided through official channels subsequent 

to the Presidential announcement August 25, 1965. As of this date such 

material consists chiefly of the Department of Defense release 

:tregarding the Presidential announcement and the Pentagon backgrounder 

i 

by Dr. Albert C. Hall, then Deputy Director (Space), ODDR&E, both of 

August 25, 1965. Speeches and interviews on MOL will not be volunteered, 

.and all requests for speeches or interviews must be cleared with ASD(PA) 

:' prior to acceptance." UNQUOTE. Salient points of the cited DOD release. 

'and background briefing were contained in AFCAV, ALMAJCOM 1699/65, 

:August 31. This policy supercedes all other MOL information guidance. 

Questions or requests as outlined above'should be forwarded through 

channels to SAF -01. . 

1 

CONTROL. NO. TOR/TOO • 'PAGE NO. OF MESSAGE IDENTIFICATION - ilmartmAg 

.NO. -.• PAGES 

2 2 • `41)S-- 

REGRADING INSTRUCTIONS - SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 

tietiliiittlitithIt thNfiDEA5k 

.•-.: 

... 

DID „;g4,-46. 173-1 RCPLACIDIVEDITION 04r t MAY Itit WHICH MAY • USED. •
EXHIBIT 13.1



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

CEO CERTIFICATION



In connection with this Amendment No.1 to the annual report of Almaden
Minerals Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Morgan Poliquin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





/s/”Morgan Poliquin”



Name: Morgan Poliquin

Title: Chief Executive Officer

September 27, 2023
First Amendment to Preferred Shares Rights Agreement



 Exhibit 4.1 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO RIGHTS AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment dated as of October 1, 2008
(“Amendment”) to the Preferred Shares Rights Agreement (“Agreement”), dated as of December 18, 2006, is between A.P. Pharma, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (the
“Rights Agent”). 
 Pursuant to Section 27 of the Agreement, this Amendment is being executed by the Company and the Rights
Agent for the purpose of amending the Agreement as set forth below: 
 The Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 1(a) shall be amended by inserting the following at the end of Section 1(a): 

 “Notwithstanding the foregoing or any provision to the contrary in this Agreement, none of Tang Capital Partners LP, or its Affiliates or Associates
(the “Tang Entities”) is an Acquiring Person pursuant to this Agreement, unless such Person acquires Beneficial Ownership of 30% or more of the then outstanding shares of Common Stock.” 
  

	 	2.	Section 1(h) shall be amended by inserting the following at the end of Section 1(h): 

 “Notwithstanding the foregoing or any provision to the contrary in this Agreement, a Distribution Date shall not occur solely by reason of the Tang
Entities acquiring Beneficial Ownership of more than 20% but less than 30% of the then outstanding shares of Common Stock.” 
 3. This
Amendment shall be deemed to be entered into under the laws of the State of Delaware and for all purposes shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of such State applicable to contracts to be made and performed entirely within
such State. 
 4. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and each of such counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed
to be an original, and all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument. 
 5. As amended hereby, the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to Rights Agreement as of the date
and year first above written. 
 A.P. PHARMA, INC. 
 By:
/s/ Gregory Turnbull      
 Name: Gregory Turnbull 
 Title: Chief Financial Officer 
 COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY 
 AS RIGHTS AGENT 
 By: /s/ Katherine Anderson     

 Signature of Authorized Signatory 
 Katherine Anderson 
 Managing Director
# C_2005115EN.01000702.xml

| 14.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/7

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 10 March 2005

in Case C-39/04 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif, Dijon): Laboratoires Fournier SA v Direction des vérifications nationales et internationales (1)

1

(Restrictions on the freedom to provide services - Tax legislation - Corporation tax - Tax credit for research)

(2005/C 115/14)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-39/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Tribunal administratif, Dijon (France), made by decision of 30 December 2003, received at the Court on 2 February 2004, in the proceedings pending before that court between Laboratoires Fournier SA and Direction des vérifications nationales et internationales, the Court (Third Chamber), composed of A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet, S. von Bahr (Rapporteur), J. Malenovský and U. Lõhmus, Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General, K. Sztranc, Administratror, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 10 March 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

Article 49 EC precludes legislation of a Member State which restricts the benefit of a tax credit for research only to research carried out in that Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 71 of 20.03.2004.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998    
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998    
<CASH>                                          21,585
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          11,257
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                10,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    138,613
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          53,441
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            54,881
<LOANS>                                        388,573
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,577
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 650,720
<DEPOSITS>                                     585,068
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,973
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,323
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,973
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,074
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 650,720
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 26,573
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,818
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   976
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                35,367
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              16,897
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,161
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           18,206
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,457
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  19
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 12,843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,767
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       7,767
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,806
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.71
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.47
<LOANS-NON>                                        616
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,588
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  3,665
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,170
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,437
<RECOVERIES>                                       387
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,577
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,577
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.53
 AMENDMENT TO THE CITIZENS BANKING CORPORATION STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN
  1.
    
    Section 1.03(p) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:(p) Fair Market Valuemeans, with respect to a share of Common Stock on the Grant Date,
the closing price of the Common Stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market (NSM) as reported in
The Wall Street Journal for the Grant Date. In the event that there were no
Common Stock transactions on such date, the Fair Market Value shall be determined as of
the immediately preceding date on which there were Common Stock transactions. Unless
otherwise specified in the Plan, Fair Market Value for purposes of determining the
value of Common Stock on the date of exercise means the closing price of such Common
Stock on the NSM on the last date preceding the exercise on which there were Common Stock
transactions, as reported in The Wall Street Journal. If the Common Stock is not
listed for trading on the NSM on the relevant date, (1) the closing price on the
securities exchange (or, if there is more than one, the principal such exchange) on which
the Common Stock is traded as reported in The Wall Street Journalfor the
relevant date; (2) if the shares are not listed for trading on any securities exchange or
the NSM on such date but closing price information is reported by Nasdaq or another
generally accepted reporting service, the closing price of the shares, as so reported by
Nasdaq or, if not reported by Nasdaq, another generally accepted reporting service, for
the relevant date; (3) if none of the foregoing is applicable, the fair market value of
the shares as of the relevant date, as determined by the Committee.2.
    
    1.03(q) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:(q) Grant Datemeans the date on which the Committee authorizes an individual Option,
Restricted Stock Award, Restricted Stock Unit or Performance Award, which date shall be
generally restricted to the third Thursday of May of each year. The preceding
restriction on the Grant Date shall not be applicable to the Grant of Options, Restricted
Stock Awards, Restricted Stock Units and Performance Awards which, in the discretion of
the Committee, are necessary or appropriate for the hiring, continued retention or
promotion of Employees and/or Non-Employee Directors, in which situations the Grant Date
means the date on which the Committee authorizes an individual Option, Restricted Stock
Award, Restricted Stock Unit or Performance Award, or such later date as shall be
designated by the Committee.
   CITIZENS REPUBLIC BANCORP/s/ Thomas W. Gallagher
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ William R. HartmanWitness Thomas W. Gallagher
    
    
    
    
    
    William R. HartmanChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         5048339
<SECURITIES>                                     20000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2192839
<ALLOWANCES>                                     44249
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              23120421
<PP&E>                                       125642018
<DEPRECIATION>                                 5052159
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               152017891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         66226634
<BONDS>                                       69073229
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                   36247675
<COMMON>                                      27956183
<OTHER-SE>                                     8704227
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 152017891
<SALES>                                       35132757
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              35211890
<CGS>                                         28227871
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 35230330
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5153041
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3629061
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (5171481)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     70237
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (5241718)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (5241718)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.37)
        

</TABLE>
# The Attorney General of Texas
May 30, 1981 MARK WHITE Attorney General
Honorable John A.Traeeer Opinion No. ~~-348 Chairman Committee onIntergovernmental Relations Texas State Senate Austin, Texas 78i’ll Re: May state release claims on land deeded to former office of the State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Dear Senator Traeger: Senate Bill 1027, which you submit with your request, releases any claim bythe state to a one-acre tract of land deeded from an individual to “Ashbel Smith, Superintendent of Public Instruction and his successors in office.‘

. . ”

. Youinform usthat the successors of the original grantor have been in continuous possession of the land for many years. The bill provides for the restoration of title to a successor of the original grantor. YOU inquire whether the Texas Constitution prohibits the enactment of Senate Bill 1027.
The office of the State Superintendent of Public Instruction was established in 1884. Acts 1884,18Leg., lst S.S., ch. 25S8,art. 7, Sl2, at 38, 41. The superintendent was charged with the general superintendency of business relating to the public schools ofthe state. Id. S13. Inour opinion, he was empowered to accept grants of property for school purposes on behalf of the state. The state has power to acquire property, dispose of it, and place it in the hands of a custodian. Conley v. Daughters of the Republic, 156S.W.197(Tex. 1913). In 1949,the legislature established the position of State Commissioner of Education and gave him the powers and duties formerly vested in the State Superintendent of Public Instruction. Acts 1949, 51st Leg., ch. 299, art. V,Sl,at 537, 543. See Educ. Code Sll.25. - On the facts presented, of which we have no direct knowledge, the tract ofland described in Senate Bill 1027belongs to the state, and we must conclude, in the absence of additional facts, is in the custody of the Commissioner of Education. Its continuous possession by successors of the original grantor does not give them an interest in it. Adverse possession would not run against the state. Humble Oil &Refining Co. v. State, 162 S.W.2d119,134(Tax. Civ. App. -Austin 1942,writ ref’dl. Nor ls the state’s title affected by the lapse of time, lathes, payment of taxes, or the dereliction ofits offices. 5

p. 1152Honorable John A.Traeger - Page Two (Mw-348)

The constitution prohibits the legislature from giving away state money or property. Tex. Const. art. III, SS44, 51, 52, 55. See also Tex. Const. art. 3, .§56. Attorney General Opinion WW-185(19571. ConsequenT Senate Blll 1027, which gratuitiously disposes ofstate property, would beunconstitutional if enacted. SUMMARY Senate Bill 1027, if enacted, would be unconstitutional because it would authorize the gratuitious disposition of state property to anindividual.

MARK WHITE Attorney General ofTexas JOHN W.FAINTER, JR. First Assistant Attorney General RICHARD E.GRAYIII Executive Assistant Attorney General Prepared bySusan Garrison Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Susan L. Garrison, Chairman Carl Glaze Rick Gllpin Jim Moelliqer Bruce Youngblood

p. 1153