alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT (23)

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference into the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of South Street Financial Corp. (filed February 11, 1998) of our report dated March 30, 2006, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition of South Street Financial
Corp. and its subsidiary as of December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, stockholders equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2005, which report appears in the
Companys 2005 annual report on Form 10-KSB.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Dixon Hughes PLLC  
|                       
|Sanford, North Carolina
|March 31, 2006
AA

NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR

1,0:76

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. ELLSWORTH

SUBJECT: Issue Papers on Defense Intelligence

Reference your memorandum, same subject, 30 December 1975.

Your memorandum requests that I provide you a set of papers

regarding major problems and issues affecting the National

Reconnaissance Program (NRP). I would like to propose an action

that may be more satisfactory to you. I had already been planning a briefing for both you and the new DCI on our Program

around the end of January 1976. I propose, that since the

issues indicated in your memo are more appropriately addressed

at the ExCom level, we have a joint meeting where we would

brief you and the DCI on the NRP, its management issues, budgets,

etc., as mentioned in your memo.

•

Of course, we intend to continue to work closely with you

and your staff as we have been already regarding current

management intelligence issues.

1111111"ter

CI A/11811

IIXOFFT DOOM OCNIOULS OF

111101110 manIIIIIIIIEarm . am OOATM OCCLAIPPV OM IMP OUT

TOP SECRET

CONTROL NO

COPY OF COPIES

PAGE OF PAGES

. :
<PAGE>

                                AMERIKING, INC.
               CALCULATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  DEC. 28, 1999 to                     DEC. 29, 1998 to
                                                                   DEC. 25, 2000                        DEC. 27, 1999
                                                             W/O PIK           With PIK           W/O PIK         With PIK
                                                            Dividends          Dividends          Dividends       Dividends
                                                           ------------       -----------         ----------      ----------
<S>                                                        <C>                <C>                 <C>             <C>
EARNINGS
Income (loss) before income taxes benefit                   (26,189,000)      (26,189,000)         2,152,000       2,152,000
Interest expense                                             21,906,000        21,906,000         20,470,000      20,470,000
Amortization of deffered financing costs                        922,000           922,000            801,000         801,000
Portion of rents representative of interest                   9,898,000         9,898,000          9,333,000       9,333,000
Preferred stock PIK dividends                                         -           621,000                  -         585,000
                                                           ------------       -----------         ----------      ----------
Total earnings                                                6,537,000         7,158,000         32,756,000      33,341,000
                                                           ------------       -----------         ----------      ----------
FIXED CHARGES
Interest expense                                             21,906,000        21,906,000         20,470,000      20,470,000
Amortization of deffered financing costs                        922,000           922,000            801,000         801,000
Portion of rents representative of interest                   9,898,000         9,898,000          9,333,000       9,333,000
Preferred stock PIK dividends                                         -           621,000                  -         585,000

Total Fixed Charges                                          32,726,000        33,347,000         30,604,000      31,189,000
                                                           ------------       -----------         ----------      ----------
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                 0.20              0.21               1.07            1.07
                                                           ------------       -----------         ----------      ----------
INSUFFICIENT EARNINGS TO COVER FIXED CHARGES                (26,189,000)      (26,189,000)               N/A             N/A
                                                           ------------       -----------         ----------      ----------
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1284 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1284

 To clarify the treatment of carbon emissions from forest biomass, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 11, 2015

   Mr. King introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify the treatment of carbon emissions from forest biomass, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CARBON EMISSIONS FROM FOREST BIOMASS.

    In taking an action regarding air emissions from an energy source 
or facility that uses forest biomass, the Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency shall assume that forest biomass 
emissions do not increase overall carbon accumulations in the 
atmosphere if--
            (1) a Forest Inventory and Analysis of the Department of 
        Agriculture that is current at the time the action is taken 
        shows that forest carbon stocks in the United States are stable 
        or increasing; or
            (2) the forest biomass is derived from mill residuals, 
        harvest residuals, or forest management activities.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 12.1
 Exhibit 12.1 Ratio of Earnings (Losses) to Fixed Charges
(000s)
 2008
    
    2007
    
    2006
    
    2005
    
    2004Earnings (Losses):Loss from continuing operations, pre-tax
    
    
    (173
    )
    
    
    (11,842
    )
    
    
    (2,582
    )
    
    
    (8,794
    )
    
    
    (42,339
    )Fixed charges
    
    
    17,528
    
    
    
    17,411
    
    
    
    11,510
    
    
    
    11,790
    
    
    
    11,422Total
    
    
    17,355
    
    
    
    5,569
    
    
    
    8,928
    
    
    
    2,996
    
    
    
    (30,917
    )Fixed Charges:Interest expense, excluding int.
income & capitalized interest
    
    
    16,181
    
    
    
    16,478
    
    
    
    11,110
    
    
    
    11,390
    
    
    
    11,024Amortized expenses related to
indebtedness
    
    
    1,347
    
    
    
    933
    
    
    
    400
    
    
    
    400
    
    
    
    398Total
    
    
    17,528
    
    
    
    17,411
    
    
    
    11,510
    
    
    
    11,790
    
    
    
    11,422Ratio of earnings (losses) to
fixed charges
    
    
    0.99
    
    
    
    0.32
    
    
    
    0.78
    
    
    
    0.25
    
    
    
    (2.71
    )Additional pre-tax earnings needed
to achieve a 1:1 ratio
    
    
    (173
    )
    
    
    (11,842
    )
    
    
    (2,582
    )
    
    
    (8,794
    )
    
    
    (42,339
    )
CISIONAL

@...o.c.Arretilla jet

John E. Clark

Rear Ada., USE -

Acting Director

OPEOSAIL ONITROOTIONO

Saadi

decArEW

SAM

AFC=

AFDC

ARM (25 cps

Unable to

determine dam

grading date.

•

•

• • • "

•

SW, COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE --• - -

REQUIRED WEPT PRIOR TO CATEGORY B D 1PTICN PROIOALLTWE

BY D.T.G. PRIOR 10 1,201ASSIIPMATION. NO =LAS REP IF D.T.G IS WOW.

OF WOOMPSOS

MESSAGE

AC-PARAPHRASE NOS

ALL IIMODIAL BS

10-1111111110--

DIPAIRMINT OF THE ARMY

miumrion

PRIOR=

weak - 17" I

PROM

ORD WARR DC

ARDC AIMRES3 AFt MR LC

ITWO: ANSA, LOU CAI.IP

Rat Me WOW CA=

ARCM PAIR= IJS PIA

RAGA VASE DC

DEF 41.963459

Effective immediately S1 progiran is redesignated BAWL

Purpose of new designation is to identify reeonealssance proems

vith innocuous name that dots not have ideal= association. SACS

name is unclassified. SANDS used in conjonctias with 21OCOMMIL1SON211

satellite xmogron also Unelassified. layover, attention is invited

to That that intelligence programs must be protected as such. All

public statements other than simple casfirmation that SUM has

beet.. redesimated MOS vIll be cleared with A. All information

relative to schedules is classified. Within classified channels

every effort vill be made to reduce promo data aimless and to restrict p.rrzren information to a rigid need-to-knav basis. Strict

L

ARPA.—. .icTwee MAWS W80 MLR Oftwaaft. 4 .......,

.1i.

"

ffearioll st• nua 1..., 1

[ ' N 1 73 MM. WI* WI rem rm. ,

.411.1.1 77111

DEF 93459

4, , , s., II I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I IV ow as.

(AUG 59)

V/111101 WILL SE USED UNtIL WINAWITIIII

PECK ARPA SOD CMS

waive eihraesne.sosan

MA. sr fears

: •

•

%WM

I

SATE

ammo

IPISS

NL 

REPNOOKTION

P5OM11111.0

•
111.111111111 aramrmort .

TIC ARMY . f

ST COMMUNICATIONS ornce . . . . .

Aro-PABAPNRANZ NOT MIQUIRED-UCEPI Palat TO CATIOORT.11 INCRIP1201 PUMA= UM

INTDRUL W$ 31 M.O. Mgt TO DICIANUMATION. NO MOLLS PAP IF D.T.G IS OUOTID 7r.

adherence to those aasea must be effected. Positive action

under appropriate security rig:dation. and directives vill be • I

Won relative to =authorised releeses . This inftenstion should be diassodnated throughout the Department

of Defense and to partInand sonnales and aandractora..

•

. • II • .1-•- • •

! a• •

. •

01 ES SAGE

S.

oh

ORIGIN: OSD • . - • •

DISTR: OCS, DCSOP, DCSLOG ACS 1, OSA, CI, R&D, AF, NAVY JCS

DEF 963459 (AUG 591 DIG: 062217Z - sva/12 .

REPRODUCTION

PROMMTID.

' •••••••
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Nuclear Power Plant Fire Modeling Analysis Guidelines (NPP FIRE MAG) — Final Report (NUREG-1934, EPRI 1023259)

On this page:
        - Publication Information 
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG-1934 (PDF - 23.85 MB)

## Publication Information

**Final Report: ** November 2012

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionOffice of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES)Washington, DC 20555-0001

U.S. NRC-RES Project ManagerM.H. Salley

Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)3412 Hillview AvenuePalo Alto, CA 94303

EPRI Project ManagerR. Wachowiak

Availability Notice

## Abstract

There is a movement to introduce risk-informed and performance-based (RI/PB) analyses into fire protection engineering practice, both domestically and worldwide. This movement exists in both the general fire protection and the nuclear power plant (NPP) fire protection communities. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has used risk-informed insights as a part of its regulatory decision making since the 1990s.

In 2001, the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) issued NFPA 805, *Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light-Water Reactor Electric Generating Plants, 2001 Edition*. In July 2004, the NRC amended its fire protection requirements in Title 10, Section 50.48 of the *Code of Federal Regulations* (10 CFR 50.48) to permit existing reactor licensees to voluntarily adopt fire protection requirements contained in NFPA 805 as an alternative to the existing deterministic fire protection requirements. In addition, the NPP fire protection community has been using RI/PB approaches and insights to support fire hazard analysis in general.

One key element in RI/PB fire protection is the availability of verified and validated (V&V) fire models that can reliably estimate the effects of fires. The U.S. NRC, together with the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), conducted a research project to verify and validate five fire models that have been used for NPP applications. The results of this effort are documented in a seven-volume NUREG report, NUREG-1824 (EPRI 1011999), *Verification & Validation of Selected Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications*.

This report describes the implications of the V&V results for fire model users. The features and limitations of the five fire models documented in NUREG-1824 (EPRI 1011999) are discussed relative to NPP fire hazard analysis (FHA). Finally, the report provides information on the use of fire models in support of various commercial NPP fire hazard analysis applications.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, April 12, 2024
#### C. SOSSAMER v. ELI H. HINSON and others.

A Justice of the Peace has authority, under sec. 50, chap. 63, Bat. Rev. to issue a summons to any county in the State, and bring the defendant before his Court for trial.

It is not error to refuse a motion to transfer a case, brought up from a Justice’s Court, upon a *Eecordari,*from the Summons Docket to the Civil issue Docket, when no error is assigned, and no merits shown or alleged.

Civil aotion commenced in a Justice’s Court and carried by *recordari*to the Superior Court, and tried before *8chenck, J.,*at Fall Term, 187J, Cabarrus Superior Court.

At the hearing a motion was made to transfer the case from the summons docket to the civil issue docket.

The motion was overruled by the Court and the defendant appealed. The facts necessary to an understanding of the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.

Barringer, for the appellant.

*Shipp &*Bailey, contra.

BynüM, J.

Whether the writ of *Recordari*granted in this case, is viewed as one in the nature 'of an appeal, or of false judgment, his,Honor committed no error in dismissing it. If the writ is viewed as in the nature of an appeal, no merits are shown or alleged, and the defendant-has been guilty of laches. If the writ is considered as in the nature of a writ of error, or false judgment, no error in law.is assigned. The only error alleged is that G-ortnan, a resident of Cabarrus county, .though having no interest, was made a defendant, fraudulently, to give the Court jurisdiction. But the Justice of the Peace had jurisdiction, whether Gorman was made defendant or not. By perusing Battle’s Revisa!, chapter 63, section 50, the Justice of the Peace of one county can -issue his summons to any other county of the State, and bring the defendant before his Court for trial.

*579The summons, in this case was issued in conformity to law, and the judgment wa3 regular and no legal defence is alleged.

There is no error.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
CKMAN

USAF

irector of Admin Svcs

6 Devg,

5 ATC

5 - AC

5 - MCPT

BSED (AU)

5 - SSMT

5 - WDZ

1 - WDSAA-1

1 WDCA

HEADQUARTERS

AIR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COMMAND

United States Air Force

Andrews Air Force Base

Washington 25, D.C.

SPECIAL ORDERS) 3 November 1958

NUMBER M-1146)

Announcement is made of the establishment of a Proposal Evaluation

Board for the purpose of evaluating and selecting an Architect-Engineering firm to design a Data Acquisition and. Tracking Station at Ottumwa,

Iowa, and a Development Control Center facility at Sunnyvale, California.

The board will convene at 1000 hours on 7 Nov 1958. In the absence of

the designated Chairman or Recorder, the senior member present at the

meeting will act as Chairman and the junior member present will perform

the duties of the Recorder. Upon submission of report the board will be

dissolved. Authority: Paragraph 5,02MDER70-1 1 dated 24 February 1958.

The following personnel will constitute the board:

COL WILLIAM D. ALEXANDER, 19560A

*COL JAMES S. CAPLES, 2943A

*COL ROBERT R. CONNER, 641A

LTCOL C. C. Lumg, 8787A

NAJ WARREN DAILEY, 37849A

*MAJ HARRY F. HEDLUND, A0772366

MR. JOHN H. LEE

*With concurrence of respective Commanders.

FOR THE COMMANDER:

AFBMD Chairman

AFIR/MRR Member

AFIR/SPR Member

AFBMD Member

AFBMD Member

BMC(AMC) Member (NonVoting)

AFBMD Recorder/

Alt Chairman

DISTRIBUTION:

2 - Ea Indiv (14)

50 - Recorder

5 - WDCE

1 - WDOEM

5 - WDT

5 - WDI

5 - wols17

5 - WDC;

5 -

442R-037Frilro-
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsEnforcement Petition (2.206)Director's Decisions on Completed 2.206 Petitions

# Director's Decisions on Completed Petitions for 2006

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, April 9, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015
          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005
          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, April 9, 2020
Exhibit 31.2

                                 Certifications

     I, Philip L. Jones, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Profile
Technologies, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

     5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

          a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls.

         Date: September 27, 2005

         /s/ Philip L. Jones
         Philip L. Jones
         Chief Operating Officer and
         Executive Vice President
29

a test progran.

"your office on November 12, 1957 the use of.certain-THOR missiles to

| military reconnaissance project be, clarified in the manner. suggested ©
.- by the enclosed draft directive. The effect of this would be to
< direct the Air Force to continue this project. subject. to the overall
direction of ABPA and, pending its 6 definitive establishment, of the

, through
missile through your directive of, January 16.'.

of this accelerated progran.

ap

MOONOMANDOM OR THE SECRETARY OF nh
SUBJECT: Meconnalsaanes Satellite

As you mov, the Air Foros tah : ‘development.
years @ reconnaissance satellite.:~ This project is under the vier
the direction of our Ballistic Missiles Division in view of the fact .
that the ATLAS would be the basic vehicle for orbiting the military .
satellite planned. “The project has resched the stage where there. .
are contracte with major concerns that are preparing the hanbare for

Tn connection with the project there has been recoumenied to :

year. substantially speed ~*~
up the date when an effective reconnaissance satellite could be first
orbited. You vill note thet the attached directive assumes approval

: In view of the Peoposed establishment of ARPA and the reference a “.
therein to satellites, it is requested that continuation of our 5

assignsent to the Arny of the development:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7875

JAMES T. BELLAMY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DONALD BAUKNECHT, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (6:07-cv-02656-RBH)

Submitted: February 17, 2009 Decided: April 15, 2009

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James T. Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

James T. Bellamy, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Bellamy v. Bauknecht , No.

6:07-cv-02656-RBH (D.S.C. July 11, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED