alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001003936
<NAME> PITTSBURGH HOME FINANCIAL CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> 6,106,938
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,540,818
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       3,566,120
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             2,273,625
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 78,088,386
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      10,013,487
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        10,090,748
<LOANS>                                    191,754,331
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,452,928
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             299,668,675
<DEPOSITS>                                 141,915,308
<SHORT-TERM>                                11,250,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,057,086
<LONG-TERM>                                116,200,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,821
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,637,690
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             299,668,675
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,711,568
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,536,369
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                71,814
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,319,651
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,691,321
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,469,819
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,849,832
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  120,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             130,256
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,193,699
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                863,183
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   571,183
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.65
<LOANS-NON>                                  4,282,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 4,282,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,419,196
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   87,273
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,005
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,452,928
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5


<MULTIPLIER>                                                1
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                        42,225,504
<SECURITIES>                                                  77,049,688
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    665,902
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      68,929
<INVENTORY>                                                    1,241,658
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             121,686,841
<PP&E>                                                         3,908,502
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 1,906,366
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               142,654,498
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         49,808,207
<BONDS>                                                          691,618
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                         323,495
<OTHER-SE>                                                    91,669,788
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 142,654,498
<SALES>                                                        2,085,690
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             143,892,242
<CGS>                                                          1,966,269
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  1,966,269
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               120,098
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              135,966,713
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  47,509,199
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           88,457,514
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  88,457,514
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      29.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      29.12

        

</TABLE>
". 

TAG BOARD 

Approved for Release: 2018/11 116 C~f69-.£ - 2 e -' 1lllllllllllllllllIllllllllllllllIllIlllll\lllllllfiiillii!iI\l1 - 

' 14000036050 ___ _ .......... 1;~·U'7" .. - :..0.... ..' _ ~ _ ~"'", 

.. v .. v-....U .... _.. ~ "' L ./ -"" .. -'II ........... " J CONTRO" 5YSTeM 

~NA-;:O;"':AL. ;=X=:CC;'\l;'-.. -":'::::;'::::;.':','.CZ O:=-;:::C.::..~ WASriiNGTO~. D.C. 

OFFICE OF 'H~ DIREC,:::,iV 12 Xarch 1971 

HAt~DLE VIA 

MEMO~~NDUM FOR DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 

SUBJECT: TAG BOARD Mission OVGr South China 

I have revie1;ved the 5 Xarch 1971 TAGBOARD mission with 

the NRO staff. As you know the mission was not successful 

due to failure to recover the payload, although I was pleased 

that the drone vehicle itself again performed the flight profile 

and payload ejection exactly as programmed. The loss of the 

payload was caused by a two part failure: 

1. The parachute system was partially disabled by 

loss of the air pickup chute which prevented an air snatch by 

the JC-130 aircraft. 

2. Although the main parachute canopy lowered the 

payload to the water surface, a subsequent pickup attempt by 

a Navy vessel was unsuccessful due to procedural errors, and 

the payload sank. 

The precise cause of failure of the parachute system cannot 

be completely defined at this point. There is a strong probability that a malfunctioning valve prevented adequate cooling 

of the parachute compartment during flight of the drone. The 

resultant overheat condition, sustained for over an hour, could 

have degraded the tensile strength of parachute components. 

Four of 7 payload hatches inspected subsequent to this flight 

were discovered to have potentially unreliable cooling valve 

lock mechanisms. 

Remedy for the malfunctioning valve is a simple safety 

wire installation. Likewise the procedural errors which prevented surface recovery can and will be prevented in the future. 

CONTROL SYSTE M 

;)00 Q,Ri::C;-,VE: 5200.10 DOCS ~'O-;I\??,-Y 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05114709 
.... Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05114 

~~:~; S2~~'~i~a --..1 ~ .................. ..1 '. 

TAG BOARD 

I ,iJould normally recor:m:end & :cevielv of the des=-gn 

engineering features of the suspect ~echanisms, and perhaps 

an intervening flight test before the next operatio~&l la~nch. 

However, it is my understand=-ng that there is an u:cgent need 

at this time for the intelligence to be ga=-~ed from a completely 

successful TAGBOARD mission over the same targets. I believe 

the use of the TAG BOARD vehicle to satisfy this need is the 

solution wh1cih pr6senC5 us W the lOw2st riSk fact~r and 

does stand a reasonable chance of success. 

W ti. ~.')lljj·"I1~ CONTROL SYSTE:M 

TAGBOARD 

, 

. ' , 

;/"\.. ,'.~ .. ". ~.; ,::.,- -~ .. ,"'-. ..... 

John L. McLucas 

',) 

GOD DIRECT,';E. 5200 ~v ;..,u:.:~ r.OT AP?L'{ 

Approved for Release: 2018/11/16 C05114709 

P;"\..>i~_._'J·_L __ ..
IMIr4Or,P ailiWrift/er22Zra

P
k:

k
tle)1.1r.:E

n ;16 0:4.:514t "9+

ie.
•
',01 = kok

nr

r kw 1 7-c ;:.;
•

: •.
Exhibit 31.4



I, Danny Zheng, certify that:



| | 1. | I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K of GlassBridge Enterprises, Inc.; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 30, 2018



| | /s/ Danny Zheng                                                                          
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Danny Zheng                                                                              
| | Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
# C_2005082EN.01000402.xml

| 2.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/4

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE

(Fourth Chamber)

of 16 December 2004

in Case C-358/03 Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria (1)

1

(Failure to fulfil obligations - Workers' protection - Health and safety of workers - Manual handling of loads where there is a risk of injury to workers)

(2005/C 82/08)

Language of the Case: German

In Case C-358/03, concerning an action for failure to fulfil obligations under Article 226 EC, brought on 19 August 2003 by the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: D. Martin and H. Kreppel) against the Republic of Austria (Agent: E. Riedl), the Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President of the Chamber, N. Colneric (Rapporteur), and J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, Judges; Advocate General, A. Tizzano; Registrar, R. Grass, gave a judgment on 16 December 2004, in which it:

Commission of the European Communities

Republic of Austria

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply, in the Land of Carinthia, with Council Directive 90/269/EEC of 29 May 1990 on the minimum health and safety requirements for the manual handling of loads where there is a risk particularly of back injury to workers (fourth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC), the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that Directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply, in the Land of Carinthia, with Council Directive 90/269/EEC of 29 May 1990 on the minimum health and safety requirements for the manual handling of loads where there is a risk particularly of back injury to workers (fourth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC), the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that Directive;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities and the Republic of Austria to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities and the Republic of Austria to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 264 of 01.11.2003

1

---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2122 

To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction of 

a hydroelectric project involving Jennings Randolph Dam. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2017 

Mr. MCKINLEY (for himself and Mr. DELANEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of 

construction of a hydroelectric project involving Jennings 

Randolph Dam. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REINSTATEMENT AND EXTENSION OF TIME 

4 FOR A FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COM5 MISSION PROJECT INVOLVING JENNINGS 

6 RANDOLPH DAM. 

7 (a) EXTENSION OF TIME.—Notwithstanding the time 

8 period specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act 

9 (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal 

10 Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 12715 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2122 IH

1 (referred to in this section as the ‘‘project’’), the Federal 

2 Energy Regulatory Commission (referred to in this section 

3 as the ‘‘Commission’’) may, at the request of the licensee 

4 for the project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance 

5 with the good faith, due diligence, and public interest re6 quirements of, and the procedures of the Commission 

7 under, that section, extend the time period during which 

8 the licensee is required to commence the construction of 

9 the project for not more than 3 consecutive 2-year periods 

10 that begin on the date of the expiration of the extension 

11 originally issued by the Commission. 

12 (b) OBLIGATION OF LICENSEE.—Any obligation of 

13 the licensee for the project for the payment of annual 

14 charges under section 10(e) of the Federal Power Act (16 

15 U.S.C. 803(e)) shall commence on the expiration of the 

16 time period to commence construction of the project, as 

17 extended by the Commission under subsection (a). 

18 (c) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.— 

19 (1) IN GENERAL.—If the period required for 

20 the commencement of construction of the project has 

21 expired before the date of enactment of this Act, the 

22 Commission may reinstate the license effective as of 

23 the date of the expiration of the license. 

24 (2) EXTENSION.—If the Commission reinstates 

25 the license under paragraph (1), the first extension 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2122 IH

1 authorized under subsection (a) shall take effect on 

2 the date of the expiration of the license. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
OFFICE 00 THE DIRECTOR

April 24, 1967

1111, NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C. 111111111Mplilill

' • • • •

' a' •

Alexander H. Flax

? 

• ••••• •• • •nn••••••••••••• 6•n•••• mr••••••••n•••••••••&"

•

111111iiil C.1110111

sift a€411•104 Cl• "US

SIN meow( sue se NICS Moll IMO

MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR OF RECONNAISSANCE PROGRAMS, CIA

SUBJECT: Project ISINGLASS

This is in response to your March 24, 1967 memorandum

to me which confirmed your previous suggestion that any further effort on the ISINGLASS-Project might best be undertaken

by the Air Force. Although there is no established Air Force

system requirement for a vehicle of this kind, there is a

broad overlapping area of technology R&D covering both the

vehicle and the engine.

In order to protect NRO security with regard to the origin

of the ISINGLASS Project, I have asked Colonel C. B. Saunders,

Director, NRO Program D, to serve as a focal point during the

transition of any of the ISINGLASS effort into the Air Force

technology program. He will assist the contractors in making

contact with the appropriate organisations in the Air Force

and will disseminate information derived from ISINGLASS in

appropriate form.
**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

| Date:                  March 30,                  2007 |                                                        |                    |
|--------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                                                   |                                                        |                    |
|                                                   |                                                        | */s/ Donald S. Robbins* |
|                                                   | Donald S. RobbinsChief Executive                    Officer |

| Date:                  March 30,                  2007 |                                                     |                 |
|--------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
|                                                   |                                                     |                 |
|                                                   |                                                     | */s/ K. Bruce Jones* |
|                                                   | K. Bruce JonesChief Financial                    Officer |

----
Exhibit 31.1

                                 Certifications

     I, Henry E. Gemino, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Profile
Technologies, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

     5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

     Date: September 27, 2007

     /s/ Henry E. Gemino
     -------------------
     Henry E. Gemino
     Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

MAHOGA N N É SOUL

,

Plaintiff Below

Appellant,

v.

DENISE LAVERN STEPHENS

and SARAH E. WILSON

,

Defendants Below

Appellee s

. §

§ No. 424, 2020

§

§ Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ C.A. No. K20C

- 07

- 025

§

§

§

§

§

Submitted : September 10, 2021

Decided: O ctober 25 , 2021

Before VAUGHN

, TRAYNOR

, and MONTGOMERY

- REEVES Justices.

ORDER

After careful consideration of the parti e s’ briefs and the record on appeal, it

appears to the Court that the judgment of the Superior Court should be affirmed on

the basis of its orders dated November 10, 2020 and November 30, 2020. Even

assuming that the statute of limitations for some of the appellant’s claims did not

expire until May 2020 and was therefore extended through July 1, 2020 by this

Court’s Administrative Order No. 7, the appellant did not file her complaint until

July 15, 2020, after the statute of limitations had expired for all of her claims.2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
#### Will of Leistiko: Leistiko, Appellant, vs. Leistiko, Proponent, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Bogue & Sanderson*of Portage.

For the respondent: *H. S. Hendrickson*and *Rogers &*Owens, all of Portage.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.