NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

6„t).4,44 

. Handle via UV4 

Control Sy to 

monimplionl 

mVrci 

1 

MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD 

SUBJECT: Minutes, November 17 MOL Program RevieWCoTnittee-Meeting 

The November meeting was convened at the Pentagon. Principals 

in attendance were: 

Dr. Flax 

General Ferguson 

General Stewart 

General Bleymaier 

General Martin 

General Berg 

Mr. Kirk 

Dr. Yarymovych 

Dr. Leonard 

INTRODUCTORY REMARKS (GENERAL BLEYMAIER) 

General Bleymaier stated that the real purpose of this meeting, 

and the Systems Office efforts since the October 27 meeting, was to 

answer the question of how to get the MOL Program on a sound financial 

basis. A prerequisite requires FY 69 and FY 70 funds in firmly 

established amounts, and then a reshaping of the development efforts 

and schedules consistent with these amounts. 

He observed that under the present arrangements: 

- A group of independent efforts are somewhat loosely allied. 

The terms and conditions of our contracts have been 

continually violated. 

- Effective program management control does not exist, and 

- The program cannot be defined contractually. 

As a result, adjusting the schedule and changing the program content, 

although very difficult and drastic, is probably the only way to get 

the program under control. It may also be, however, that the best 

overall alternative approach would be to continue with only the payload development. 

The contractors are to propose feasible schedules consistent with 

their individual assigned FY funding constraints. They are also to 

develop a "strawman" program which reflects the effect on costs and 

schedules, of some 50 Systems Office identified possible changes to 

the present program. The "strawman" results are due to the Systems 

Office about November 22. 

DORIAN Page / of .; pages 

Copy I of / copies 

SAFSL Control-Bye, 
DORIAN 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

As part of the Systems Office total reevaluation direction, each 

of the major associate contractors has been requested to tailor his 

efforts in accordance with dollar amounts assigned to him for each 

of FY 69 through FY 71. The total planning NOA for each of these years 

is $640 million, $590 million and $590 million respectively. The 

T-IIIM associate contractors have been directed to discontinue all 

effort not specifically identified in the directive to them. Furthermore, all contractor field activities at VAFB are to be cut to the 

absolute essential minimum; Phase IB effort for the support module 

is being deferred 6 months; and discussions are being held with the 

Gemini B contractor to reduce him to the T-IIIM equivalent level of 

effort. 

The immediate effect of these actions will be that the FY 68 

development program will stay within the total cumulative NOA of 

$722 million at end June 1968. 

The total program cost change resulting from the 640/590/590 

NOA projections, and proposed by the contractors is +$560 million, 

bringing the total cost up from $2.35 to $2.91 billion. 

General Bleymaier then pointed out what became obvious as the 

meeting progressed. That is, that Eastman Kodak has admitted that 

it could never have met the compact 12 schedule. This inability is 

a result not of lack of funding support but the fact that EKC's 

technical and production competence, independent of funding, cannot 

support our present schedules. They are now offering a compact 12 + 

12 i.e., a two year slip to the baseline program, as their capability, 

at an increase in cost to $491 million. 

The presentations made by the individual contractors are discussed 

in the succeeding paragraphs. 

Eastman Kodak Company (Mr. Sewell, Program Manager) 

Mr. Sewell described the EKC program cost evolution from $294 

million in December 1966 to $491 million in November 1967 with an 

attendant 24 month slip. The increase in costs of approximately $75 

million is ascribed to increases due to directed program content 

changes such as the sliding mask, flip mirror, thermal slats, special 

studies, and changes to Special Industrial Requirements. To this 

there is also added an allowance of about $60 million for probable 

future changes, and a forecast camera overrun of $65 million over the 

life of the contract. 

EKC is now at a level of activity consistent with the assigned 

FY 68 constraint of $99 million. The level of development activity 

over the ensuing 3 years will permit them to satisfy a December 71 

Page 2._ of .6 Pages 

Copy / of 4/ copies 

SAFSL Control B'-e. / 31/4 - 6 7 
Page 3 of .5--pages 

Copy / of copies 

SAFSL Contr 1 

DORIAN 

T 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

first launch date. This schedule adjustment is accomplished by: 

- Delaying the compact 12 Mission Module level of activity 

at EKC for 1 year. 

- Delaying the qualification and flight model COA and LM 

activity at EKC for 1 year. 

- Stretching COA and LM component development activity to 

a "2 years work in 3 years" schedule. 

Mr. Sewell very pointedly stated that EKC could not have 

accomplished the compact 12 regardless of funding. Their earlier 

schedule was unrealistic, and they had experienced difficulty finding 

the necessary skilled labor. 

Dr. Flax observed that it was not obvious to him why there should 

be cost increases attendant to the mere fact that the program changed. 

He also inquired whether the 24 month slip could be lived with by the 

EKC subcontractors. Mr. Sewell said he assumed that it could. 

General Electric Company (Dr. Miller) 

The General Electric Company FY 68 budget has been set at $73 

million and GE is undertaking the actions necessary to stay within this 

ceiling. The major effect will be the laying off of some 600 employees 

over the next few months. 

In describing the evolution of the GE cost increases to their 

current $469 million level, Dr. Miller pointed out that there had 

been some 100 items previously deferred or changed. The major cost 

items making up the $100 million increase are the field test support 

program, the Acquisition and Tracking Scope change from the "little 

eye" to the "big eye", the IVS responsibilities, the SAFSL 10010 

materials exhibit, and field support hardware. These make up some 

$93 million of the $100 million increase. 

Dr. Miller emphasized that the GE estimate included everything 

known or anticipated to do the program; that there were no known 

surprises or hidden costs, and that GE would continue to attempt to 

reduce program content and tailor the schedule to conform to prescribed 

FY fund ceilings. 

Based on the FY 69-71 bogeys they are projecting a 12-14 month 

adjustment to the compact 12. 
Page 4/ of 3 pages 

Copy / of L- copies 

SAFSL Control 

DORIAN 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

At the conclusion of the GE presentation, General Martin commented 

that the program slippage appeared to him to be so great that it 

probably would be cheaper and auicker to go to an unmanned development 

program effort, and that capability could probably be attained 

without man, using the program 612 vehicle. 

Dr. Flax's reply was to the effect that if EKC is the pacing 

element, General Martin's suggestion might not be valid. If there 

were fund limitations but EKC was not pacing, thenGeneral Martin's 

suggestion might be right. 

McDonnell Douglas Company (Mr. Pepping/St. Louis) 

The Gemini B effort has been reduced from $90 to $79 million 

through June 1968, and the total GB cost estimate has increased 

from $274 to $298 million. The reduction to a FY 68 $47 million NOA, 

and the FY 69-71 fund levels would, in McDonnell's opinion require a 

leveling off of their manpower at its present number and add some 15 

months to the presently scheduled April 70 GBQ launch. 

In response to a question regarding time required to build a 

Gemini B, Mr. Pepping replied that given the necessary funding, the 

lead time was 28 months. 

McDonnell Douglas Company (Mr. Johnson/Huntington Beach) 

Mr. Johnson very concisely reviewed the program funding history 

and its effect on schedules and manpower, and identified program changes. 

He estimated that with the funding levels proposed through FY 71, 

the schedule would slip seven months and cost would increase about 

$100 million to $1.01 billion. 

Summary Discussion (Meeting Principals) 

At the conclusion of the contractor presentations, the following 

dialogue took place. 

Dr. Flax noted that EKC is the real key to our problem. The 

other contractors are sufficiently flexible and responsive, but the 

entire schedule and integration plan is paced by EKC. If, as they 

mentioned in their briefing, are unable to do the work at the Mission 

Module level, everything else must be adjusted. 

He was also very concerned at the EKC position that even though 

they had not been fund limited, they could not have made the compact 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

12 schedule. Particularly when just 2 months ago they had assured 

Mr. McNamara that the funding program and schedules were adequate 

and realistic. 

Dr. Flax suggested that Generals Stewart, Bleymaier and Martin 

visit EKC to determine the reason for the sudden shift in company 

position, and to determine if the situation can be substantially 

improved. He indicated that he might personally visit EKC in the 

near future. 

General Stewart reminded the group that there was still the 

"strawman" exercise to be completed, and some useful alternatives 

might possibly result. (The "strawman" is the cost reduction program 

• which recommends certain deletions to program content, and alteration 

to development test flow schedules). The contractors cost and 

schedule responses are due November 22. On November 28 the Systems 

and Program Offices Program Managers will meet to review the results, 

and determine the actions to be taken. 

Dr. Flax then made some general observations 

- Program costs have escalated three times in the past year. 

- We appear to be faced with the necessity for 3 high cost 

years, or a very, very high cost peak year. 

- We may be rapidly pricing the program out of business. 

- Our problems with EKC may be due to their inability to 

get sufficiently trained, qualified help. We must look 

into ways of speeding up their effort, but we must be 

sure that in pulling in the schedule we don't reduce our 

confidence in success. 

- EKC is the focus of our problem. 

General Stewart will keep Dr. Flax advised of events. 

A copy of the briefing charts used at this meeting is on file in 

the MOL Program Office, SAFSLP. 

JAMS T. STEWART 

Major General, USAF 

Vice Director, MOL Program 

DORIAN Page £ of 3 pages 

Copy / of copies 

SAFSL Contr 1 i 2 13 / 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

TAB No 

Introduction by General Bleymaier 1 

Eastman Kodak (Mr. Sewell) 2 

General Electric (Dr. Miller) 3 

McDonnell Douglas (Mr. Pepping/St. Louis) 4 

McDonnell Douglas (Mr. Johnson/Huntington Beach) 5 

Strawman Plan (General Bleymaier/Dr. Leonard) 6 

Handle via MUNN 

Control System 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 

PROGRAM REVIEW COUNCIL " 

BRIEFING 

17 NOVEMBER 1967 

• 
NRO APP 

RELEA 1 'JULY 2015 

IS WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING 

A REAL SOLUTION TO 

THE PROBLEM 

THE ANSWER 

IS 

NO 

 • 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE JULY 2015 

CAN THE PROGRAM 

SURVIVE 

IN THIS CLIMATE ? 

PROBABLY CAN 

BE MADE 

TO SURVIVE 
NRO APPROV n pop 

RELEAS JULY 2015 

WE NOW HAVE A GROUP OF. - 

INDEPENDENT EFFORTS SOMEWHAT 

LOOSELY ALLIED 
NRO APPR ID+ R 

RELEA 1 JULY 2015 

OVERALL CONTRACTUAI_LY THE TERMS . 

& CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN VIOLATED 

REPEATEDLY -- REDUCING CONTRACT 

TO A LEGAL INSTRUMENT FOR APPLYING 

FUNDS - 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEAS ULY 2015 

EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT CONTROL OF 

PROGRAM DOES NOT EXIST 

UNDER PRESENT ENVIRONMENT IMPOSSIBLE 

FURTHERMORE - PROGRAM CANNOT BE DEFINED 

CONTRACTUALLY gla 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEAS 

PROGRAM HAS BEEN FORCED TO . 

REACT TO FUND AVAILABILITY•NOT 

FUNDS TO PROGRAM NEEDS 

CONDITION WILL PROBABLY CONTINUE - 

NEGATES SCHEDULES, PLANS AND 

• CONTRACTS 
ru. 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE J 1JLY 1111 

RECOGNIZING THESE AND OTHER CONDITIONS 

WHAT TO DO? 
4. NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 

ADJUSTING SCHEDULE ONLY IS 

TANTAMOUNT TO DOING NOTHING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 ' 

CHANGING PROGRAM CONTENT AND 

ADJUSTING SCHEDULE SERIOUSLY 

JEOPARDIZES PROGRAM 

PROBABLY ONLY ACCEPTABLE 

EXPEDIENT HOWEVER SEVERE 

WILL CREATE MANY MANY PROBLEMS 
NRO APPROVEDFOR 

RELEASE Y 2015 

• 

CONTINUE WITH PAYLOAD 

ONLY MEANS A NEW PROGRAM - 

PERHAPS BEST OVERALL 

APPROACH 
Perafti) 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE Y cu ID 

SPECIFIC ACTIONS TAKEN 

/ArrE-Rittl 

• DIRECTED CONTRACTORS TO LIMIT EFFORT TO DOLLAR AVAILABLE 68, .69, 70, 71 

t'4- 

cit 

Ott(' 4114 

• LURE= MAC &J-I I IM TO LEVEL-OF-EFFORT CONTRACT, (1 JAN 68) 

• DIRECTED CONTRACTORS WITHDRAW VAFB PERSONNEL - BARE MINIMUM ONLY 

DELAYED PHASE 1B FOR SUPPORT MODULE, (JAN TO 1 JUL 68) 
SIGNED (CONTRACTING OFFICER) 

CONIIDENTIAL 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEAS CrEY 2015 

TWX TO MAJOR CONTRACTORS, 7 NOV 67 

SUBJECT: CONTRACT XXXX 

1. REF LIMITATION OF GOVERNMENTS OBLIGATION CLAUSE IN SUBJECT CONTRACT.. 

2. YOU ARE HEREBY DIRECTED TO TAILOR YOUR EFFORT SO THAT THE FOLLOWING DOLLAR AMOUNTS 

ARE NOT EXCEEDED REGARDLESS OF IMPACT ON SCHEDULES AT THIS TIME. IN fY 68 THE 

GOVERNMENTS OBLIGATION FOR YOUR SEGMENT OF THE MOL PROGRAM WILL BE LIMITED TO 

MILLION. THIS EQUATES TO A CUMULATIVE SUM OF $ MILLION THRU 

FY 68. YOUR FY 69 AND FY 70 LIMITATION WILL BE $ AND $ MILLION 

RESPECTIVELY. YOU WILL NOT EXCEED THESE LIMITATIONS. FOR PLANNING PURPOSES FY 71 

AVAILABILITY WILL NOT EXCEED FY 70. 

3. PLEASE ADVISE OF IMPACT TO SUBJECT CONTRACT. 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 15 

TWX - DIRECTION TO LEVEL OF EFFORT 

TO: (ALL T-I I IM CONTRACTORS) 

I. THIS WILL CONFIRM THE AGREEMENTS REACHED DURING THE MEETING ON 8 NOV WHEREBY A 

12-MONTH SLIP FROM THE PRESENT SCHEDULE DATE IS CONTEMPLATED. SPECIFICALLY, YOU ARE 

DIRECTED TO DISCONTINUE ALL EFFORT EXCEPT AS DELINEATED BELOW: 

I I. (SPECIFIC ITEMS, BY CONTRACTOR) 

III. GUIDELINES: THOSE ITEMS ALREADY ON ORDER BUT NOT FABRICATED OR IN THE PROCESS OF 

BEING FABRICATED SHOULD BE DEFERRED. ADVISE THIS OFFICE OF THOSE ITEMS IN WHICH THIS 

COURSE OF ACTION WOULD RESULT IN A PROHIBITIVE COST IMPACT. 

IV. PROVIDE BY 22 NOV (DESIRED) BUT NLT 1 DEC, A REVISED SCHEDULE OF TASKS REFLECTING 

THE DIRECTION UNDER PARTS I AND II, AND A ROM COST ESTIMATE AND MANPOWER SUMMARY BY 

FISCAL YEARS, PLUS THE TOTAL PROJECTED PROGRAM COSTS. 

V. YOU MAY ANTICIPATE A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL, DURING JAN 1%8, BASED UPON SAFSL 

ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF PART IV, ETC. 

CONFIDENTIAL 
NIRO APPR 1-0K 

RELEAS 1 JULY 2015 

SPECIFIC ITEMS, BY CONTRACTOR 

MARTIN 

• CONTINUE 4TH LOADS CYCLE & PHASE I POGO STUDY 

• DECREASE CREW SAFETY EFFORT 

• IDENTIFY & CONTINUE DEVELOPMENT EFFORT, AVE & AGE, FOR 

OTHER PROGRAMS 

IDENTIFY TASKS & MINIMUM LOE, INCLUDING INTERFACE, WHICH 

MUST BE CONTINUED 

ACED 

• MAINTAIN EXISTING HARDWARE SCHEDULES FOR FY 68 & 69 

• SUPPORT MMC DEFINED INTERFACE REQUIREMENTS 

• CONTINUE T-I I IC GUIDANCE SYS DEVELOPMENT (FLT QUAL MOL HDW) 

• IDENTIFY INSCOPE DEV EFFORT WHICH MUST BE CONTINUED 

• RESUME DISCONTINUED EFFORT LATER IAW REVISED SCHEDULE 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 

AEROJET 

• MAINTAIN STAGE I DEVELOPMENT ON SCHEDULE - SPECS, SYS EFFECT, 

AGE PROCEDURES, POGO, PERT, SYS ENG, AND INTERFACE REQUIREMENTS 

DELAY STAGE II PRODUCTION - MEET NEW DEMO SERIES (OCT 69-MAR 70 

PERIOD) 

• SUPPORT MMC 4TH.LOAD CYCLE 

DEFER PROD TO MEET 1ST ENGINE SYS DELIVERY (JUL 1970) 

• DEFER ALL FIELD ACTIVITIES 

MAINTAIN STAGE I ROTAR DEV EFFORT ON CURRENT SCHEDULE 

UTC 

RESCHEDULE DEV PROGRAM - CULMINATE 5TH PFRT WITH DATE 

COMPATIBLE WITH ADDITIONAL 12-MOS SLIP 

• CANCEL THRUST TERMINATION AT EDWARDS . 

• REDUCE UBS DEV PROGRAM TO MINIMUM TO SUPPORT C&D PROGRAMS 

SUPP RT 4TH LOAD CYCLE 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE L T cu 

ENTIAL 

TWX - WITHDRAWAL VAFB PERSONNEL 

ACTION FOR (PROGRAM MANAGER) 

EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, AND THROUGH CY 1968, MOL CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL PHYSICALLY 

LOCATED AT VAFB WILL BE REDUCED TO A MINIMUM. ONLY THOSE PEOPLE ESSENTIAL TO 

THE OPERATION AND/OR MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENTS/FACILITIES IN EXISTENCE THERE 

DURING THIS TIME PERIOD WILL BE PERMITTED. IN THIS REGARD, THE LEVEL OF EFFORT 

PERMITTED WILL BE AS NEGOTIATED WITH THE MOL SPO ON SITE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE, 

COLONEL HULL, CHIEF, MANNED PROGRAMS DIVISION 6595TH AEROSPACE TEST WING. 

CONFIDENTIAL 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE Ldt?L'4 Ziff 

STATUS REPORTS 

SPECIAL HANDLING 

SUMMARY 

EK 

GE 

MCDONNELL 

DOUGLAS 

SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE Y 2015 

FINANCIAL STATUS FY 1968 

SYSTEM SEGMENT To-r72.1- MOL. CONTRACTOR ALL DATE REPORT 14 NOV 

FY 67 SUMMARY 

GOV'T FUND VIZ 

ACTUALS 263.7 

±VAR —28.4 

SVC) •••• • ■•■•■• amain 800 

Govr• runic:Mod ce LING 

=ERN. 1I••■ ••••• •••••• *rap 722.3 

••••• 0.11110 

M24. 

-4-- 

, 90* ••••■' 

2.923 

263.7 

ZOO ■-• 

'too 

.11•••••• •••■ Zoo 

JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN TOTAL 

RATE W. ,4 . l N1.5 L13.9 32.4 28.7 32.7 314..4 34.8 izal 410,1 40.1 #2.4 438,10 

4.6o •••••111 

ACTUALS - L/ 38.1Ili.* 

or.....wowarra.rwromml

GOV'T FUNDING q0.4. 

o.lpooftm■■•••••

7.1 

■■■••■• 

61.9 117.51 • 
8000 

Number 

of 

People 

MANPOWER FY 1968 

DIRECT & INDIRECT 

JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN 

• 

• 

.. w 

..... 

am ■■■••■••■••••■ 

'7- 

.. 4-

soonli. 

-- 

... 

4.... 

...M. • • Ow • . 

..... 00 .... .M. •• • 01 • =WOO ••••••■••■■•••=.... 

• 

, 

will 

Mad 

ow ...FN. 

l Zec 

6724 7281 7967 8154 8360 , 8552 8986 9300 9758 1033 10834 11334 

3282 3531 3841 : 3878 3915 3957 4140 4322 .4506 4732 4965 - 5197 

10006 10812 11808 12032 12275 12509 13126 13622' 14264 ' 15085 15799 16531 

1 JULY 2015 

16000 

12000 

4000 

F DIRECT 

A 

INDIRECT 

A 

TOTAL 
RELEASE 201b 

- SPECIAL HANDLING 

MAXIMUM iell=z6PTIIIKIN LIABILITY 

FOR MAJOR CONTRACTORS' TWX 

FY 68 

CUM 

FY 68' FY•69. FY '70' /7/ 

DOUGLAS 151.6 259.6 ,226.0 190.0 

GE 75.4 106.2 106.0 90.0 

EKC 93.4 151.4 100.0 100.0 

McDONNELL 40.8 79.5 68.0 50.0 

.0. 2 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

- SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROV B FOR 

RELEAS JULY 2015 

5 STEP /Wet) 

CURRENT CONTRACT FINANCIAL REPORT VS PRESENT PROGRAM (12C) 

"13 Fi) PY 

PROPOSES SCHEDULE A4 TO DOLLARS AVAILABLE 68, 69, 70, 71 . • 

STRAWMAN PROGRAM (INCLUDING SCHEDULE) 

Eg.littlisiNt* COST IA STRAWMAN PROGRAM 

m /ye 

ellONC=M2EW ADDITIONAL SCHEDULE ADJUSTMENTS Lie•Mme • WASS OF (4) 

Jose v E le** bOU.AeS 424,42,) 

CONFIDENTIAL 
84x.8 . 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

CUMULATIVE FY 68 POS ITION - COMPACT 12 PROGRAM 

Govt Contr 10% 

Contractor Reqmt Funds Risk Total Reduction 

DAC 312.9 282.0 30.9 312.9 264.6 

GE 144.4 103.3 24.1 127.4 96.2 

ER 205.3 162.7 162.7 151.5 

MAC 97.9 90.3 90.3 84.5 

L11 

New 

Logo 

Deficit 

To Reqmt 

- 5.0 259.6 53.3 

+10.0 106.2 38.2 

151.5 53.8 

- 5.0 79.5 18.4 

TIM 10i.6 87,2 14.5 101.7 86.3 86.3 

, 

OTHER 39.2 46 8 - 46.8 , 39.'2 39.2 

• 

.',144, V" ;.,.,, * '.-- i!,,, r-'-- 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 FY68 DEFICIT vs TOTAL PROGRAM COSTS 

FY 68 

Deficit 

Total Program Costs. 

12 C $ Limited 

53.3 954 1010 

38.2 440 469. 

53.8 491 507 

18.4 298 325 

56 

29' 

: .16.• 

2183 1 2311 128' 

565 

,.. 599 34 

Contractor 

DAC 

GE 

EK 
NRp APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 

SCHEDULE ADJUSTMENT (1st MANNED FLT) 

DAC 7 MONTHS 

• • -; • • - • 

DAC - 

GE 

EKC 

MAC - 

TOTAL 

• 

67 68 69 70 71 72 73/74 TOTAL 

95.1 164.5 : 226.0 190.0 163.0 120.0 5L4 1)10.0 

32.4 73.8 106.0 90.0 86.0 59.0 27.8 469.0 

52.5 99. 0 100.0 100.0 71.0.39.0 22.9 484.4 

32.2 47.3 68.0 50.0 50.0 50;0 2Z. 4 324.9 

292.3 430.0. 640,0 594. 0 590: 0 --- 2910.0 

'--5EeRE--T-- SPECIAL HANDLING 

••■••■•••■•••-...•,.......4.11■••■•••••••■•■•11Cert••••• 
DEV 19 PROD 14 

DEV 9 PROD 15 INT 13 1 

McD ONN 

, . 

DOUGLAS 

GENERAL ELECTR I C 

EK 

.../.7,EV 7 

12 

DEV 6 

PROD 24 

PROD 38 INT 

*ACTUAL PRODUCTION 

BEGAN MAY 67 

SPECIAL HANDLING 

NRO APO 

RELEASE 

Ca FOR 

SEC REVS PEC1 AL HANDL I NG 

BASELINE PLUS 12 MONTHS 

APR DEC 

FY 68 FY 69 1 1 1 1111 

P( 70 

11111111111 

FY 71 

1. 111L1 11111111111 

MARTIN 

AEROJET 

DEV 19 °*.....„--.-PROD 20 

12 

DEV 16 

0111•11. ••■■ 1•1111111•10 

$2. 

DEV 24 PROD 18 INT 6 

12 • 

DEV 7 PROD 24 

Immo. ••■■=1. 

12 

ACED 

lake! 

INT 

INT 9 

I' 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE..-1 ULY 2015 SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

TAKE STEPS TO CREATE AN INTEGRATING CONTRACTOR 

TERMINATE McDONNELL EFFORT AT ST LOUIS 

START UP TO BE AT HUNTINGTON BEACH 

. ONE CONTRACTOR 

MAKE GE SUB TO EK OR VICE VERSA OR CLEAN UP THEIR 

ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES 

DAC ASSIGNED OVERALL INTEGRATION ROLE 

1-tCRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

• 
111 --•.II I 

ASE 1 JULY 2015 

Special Handling 

—Seere6- 

PROGRAM REVIEW COUNCIL 

REPORT 

. FINANCIAL STATUS FY1968_ 

. MANPOWER 

. FUNDING FORECAST HISTORY AND 

JUSTIFICATION 

. ANIIIM111■11•111111111•111111M• 

. PROGRAM' CONTENT 

. 1111111111111111111111=1111111111111111111M 

PROGRAM CONCEPT 

EASTMAN KODAK CO. 

17 NOVEMBER 1967 

Special Handling 
w. 

2 

"1" ••••■•• .11m, allow 

• GOV T CEILING 1=9 

. 41111•11111111•010 • 

50 — 411.111, 

250 

FY67 SUMMARY 

GOV'T. FUND 75.3 

ACTUALS 75.1 

+VAR + . 2 

200 

•••• 

61, • • 11••••111•1 • 111 • 61,1111.111•1 

150-- 

GOV'Ir. FUNDING 

100 

• 

=MIND 

•■•••• WAND ••■ 

.0' • 

w/o. 

SABLE 

F TURES 

S OPEz21.9 

FINANCIAL STATUS FY1968 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RESE 1 JULY 281 

Special Handling 

—Svere4— 

SYSTEM SEGMENT: PHOTOGRAPHIC P/L CONTRACTOR: EASTMAN KODAK DATE RPT. 29 OCT. 67 

CU1/LM ACTUALS TO DATE10/29 

LABOR 11. 2 

MATERIAL 8.4 

"SUBS M. I. 

OTHER 3.7 

OVERHEAD 20.6 

PROFIT /FEE 5.6 

COMM RES 20.0 

— TOTAL 107. 6 

 JUL. AUG. SEP. OCT. NOV. DEC, JAN. FEB MAR APR. MAY 

ONTR, FCST. 6.4 8.7 9.8 . 8.1 13.1 14.2 152 1 14.9 15.2 15.7 15.7 16.0 1 5.7 Ai 

CTUALS 6.4 8.7 9.8 7. 6 

V'T FUNDIN 3 25.4 29.8 

PROGRAM CONTENT: TOTAL KNOWN AS OF 17 NOV. 67 

PROGRAM SCHEDULE: COMPACT 12 
D70 APPROVED FOR 

1 JULY 2015 

SEGMENT: 

PHOTOGRAPHIC 

PAYLOAD 

ItsFINANCIAL STATUS FY1968 

BY COST ELEMENT 

(IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 

CONTRACTOR: EASTMAN KODAK CO. 

ACTUALS AS OF: 29 OCT. 67 

FORECASTS AS OF: 1 JULY 

REVISED TO NEW •PROGRAM 

CONTENT* 

1 Y67 

OTA i 

iI. - 7: iq.7 la -141/1- 4-1.,-,__ 1.04 0/.4 i,o _z_ i qylo,, 2Ybb 

JUL. AUG SEP. • OCT. NOV. DEC. AN. FEB_ MAR APR_ )4,0tA't ,Tm‘T o . . 

F 8.0 .7 .8 .8 . .9 1.1 / 1.3 LS / 1.4; 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6, 14. 

LABOR A 8.0 .7 .8 .8 .9 I 

_s. 6. 1 . 5 .4 .7 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2'_1.3 i 1 5 1.5 ; 1..5 . 12. ' li TER1AL. 

A 6.1 .5 .4 .7 

F 26.0 4.1 2.2 Z..? •318 7.8 7:8 _ 1. 8 7.8 7.8 8.0 8.0 8.1 mri ...6 A 26. 0 4. 1 2. 2 2. 3 3. 5 MN 

' F 2. 5 .3 .2 .3 .4 .5 • .6 _ .7 .7 . 7 .7 .7 .7 6.5 

• THER A 2. 5 .3 .2 .3 .4 • 

• vERHJEAD PM 1.4 1. 5 1. 5 1, 4 1.9 2. 5 2. t 2. 8 2. 9 2.9 2. 9' ,,, 2. 9, PM 

EzGEtA A 14.7 1.4 I. 5 1. 5 1. 5 MIN 

OT CONTR 57. 3 7. 0 5. 1 5. 6 7. 5 12. 3 13. 3 14. 1 • 13.9_ 14. 2 14. 6 14.6 14.8 137,0 

EXPEND • 57.3 7.0 5.1 5.6 7.0 

PROFIT/F 

. FEE A 

3. 8 .4 .4 , . 4 .6 .8 . 9 . 10 .9 1.0 1. 1 1.1 1.2 9.8 

3.8 .4 .4 .4 .6 

GANC F 14.0 •1.0, 43. 2 +3. 8 +6.0 

COMMIT A14. 0 1. 0 +3. 2 +3. 8 - ... 

F 75.1 . 6. 4 8.7 9.8 8.1 13.1 14.2 15.1 14.8 15.2 15.7 15.7 16.0 152. 

TOTAL A An 75.1 1 6.4 8.7 9.8 7.6 

FY68 TOTA% 

t 

. 6.4 15.1 24.9 33.0 46.1 60.3 7`5.4. 90. 2105.4 121.1 136. 152.8 

• Pa0Cafill CONTENT: TOTAL KNOWN AS 01 17 NOWT 67 
NR P APTIRTETi-FOR 

R' LEASE 1 JULY 2015 

_ - 

CHANGES IN FY 68 PROGRAM PLAN 

SrCRFT SPECIAL HANDLING 

EASTMAN KODAK 

DATE SCHEDULE PROGRAM CONTENT 

(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 

FY 68 FUNDING REQ'T 

(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) 

Dec 66 BASELINE (AO) 106.4- 

JUN 67 DELTA 15 

,• : 

. • 

293.9 

398. 

SEP 67 DELTA I2C + 3 

: 

431.8 - ".- 7"-`-'• 

• 

• • 

• SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

• WE ARE NOW FOLLOWING A PLAN CONSISTENT WITH 

17 NOV 67 DELTA 12C +. 12 99.0 491.3 

• 

".; 

• 
Ak 

NR• yaw 

RELE 1J. 

OVED FOR 

MANPOWER 

ALL. FISCAL YEARS/DIRECT & INDIRECT 

ACTUALS AS OF: 29 OCT 67 

FORECASTS AS OF: 17 NOV 67 

YSTEM SEGMENT: PHOTOGRAPHIC PAYLOAD CONTRACTOR: EASTMAN KODAK CO. 

1 4 

FY 68 

3 

FY 69 

4 

FY 70 

4 

FY 71 

4 

FY 72 

4 

F 250 I 365 380 540 300 300 - 140 

(242) 

NGINEERING 

UPPORT A 215 

CIENTIFIC & F 555 I 690 695 525 400 

NGINEERING 

GMT. & 

I 935 175 

(466) 

F 50 I 55 ZS 

A_ 414 

55 70 45 40 

A 43 (46) 

F 260 380 400 270 240 100' 

1 

DMINISTRATICN 

HOPS & 

PRODUCTION 

530 

A 197 (212) 

• 

F 130 I 150 HER 155 175 120 100 60 

A 101 (1191 

F 

A 

TOTAL. .1 340 450 460 625 335 260 130 . 

INDIRECT A 26 2.4 

TOTAL 

F 1585 2090 2145 2875 . 1595 1340 630 

A 1233 (1379) 

EKC DIRECT LABOR AND R&D INDIRECT LABOR AS OF END OF QUARTER 

( ) AS OF 29 OCT. 67 PROGRAM CONTENT: TOTAL KNOWN AS OF 17 NOV. 1967 

PROGRAM SCHEDULE: COMPACT 12 

RASED ON 45 SCHEDULED HOURS PER. WEEK 
J

RO APPROVED FOR 

3c...1Gt 

HISTORY OF FUNDING FORECASTS 

(IN MILLIONS) AS OP 29 OCT. 1967 

YS TEM SEGMENT: PHOTOGRAPHIC PAYLOAD CONTRACTOR: EASTMAN KODAK CO. 

DATE SCHEDULE 

DEC. 66 CONTRACT 

SCHEDULE 

MAR. 67 DELTA 15 

JUN. 67 DELTA 15. 

PRINCIPAL 

CONTENT 

NOTE A • 

NOTE B 

NOTE B I 

SEP. 67 DELTA12C+3 NOTE C2' 

OCT. 67 DELTA 12C NOTE C 9 

NOV. 67 DELTA 12C NOTE D3 

FY67 FY68 FY69 FY70 FY71. FY72 FY73 TOTAL 

100.4 106.4 43.3 31.6 11.4 .8 293.9 

75.3 112.4 101.8 63. 6 30. 2 13.7 1. 3 398. 3 

75.8 112.6 101.3 61. 5 32.3 13.7 1. 3 398.5 

75.8 123, 5 135. 3 -8.4 13.0 5.8 431.8 

75.8 143.3 118.6 92. 8 430. 5 

75. 1 152.8 146.2 61.0 38:9 18.2 491.3 

1 

*1‘44----- 

NOTE A COA LEVEL: SYSTEM & DESIGN ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURE & TEST OF 

DEVELOPMENT MODELS AND FV3-7. 

MPS LEVEL: TEST DEFINITION STUDY: WAG FOR MPS DEVELOPMENT MODELS 

AND FV 3-7 ASSY. AND TEST 

NOTE B - SAME AS A WITH UPDATED MPS WAG PLUS CCN'S AND DIRECTED ITEMS. 

NOTE C - SAME AS A WITH UPDATED MPS ROM (DEV. MODELS AND FV1-5) PLUS FURTHER 

CCN'S AND DIRECTED ITEMS (LAB ATMOSPHERE) AND BLDG. 103. 

NOTE D - SAME AS C PLUS MPS WAG FV61‘7, SAFSL 10010. SPARES, ULE, AND UTB. 

1 "" DO SO/ 

- un 11? 

3 - !PSC JAL Special. tWKiling 

( ) 
FY 67 

FY68 

FY 69 

FY 70-73 

- .7 

+ 29.3 

+

:::10.9 

+ 20.0 

FY 67-73 TOTAL + 59.2 

O APPROVED FOR 

ELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

Special Handling JUSTIFICATION OF FORECASTS 8 

—Seerei— COMPARISON ANALYSIS 

(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) AS OF: 29 OCT. 67 

SYSTEM SEGMENT: PHOTOGRAPHIC PAYLOAD CONTRACTOR: EASTMAN KODAK CO. 

DEC 66 TO MARCH 67 

FORECAST INCREMENT 

FY 67 - 25.1 

FY 68 6.0 

*Y 69 -+ 58.5 

FY 70-73 + 65.0 

FY 67-73 TOTAL +104.4 

MARCH 67 TO SEPT 47 

FORECAST INCREMENT 

FT 67 + .5 

FY68 + 11.1 

FY 69 +33.5 

FT 70-73 - 11.6 

FY 67-73 TOTAL + 33.5 

SEPT 67 TO NOV 67 

FORECAST INCREMENT 

---I RESULTS FROM MPS STUDY 

LATE AUTHORIZATION FOR BUILDING 

FEB 67 SCHEDULE SLOWDOWN 

MPS TESTING RE-FORECAST 

ADDED SIR: CHAMBER CONCEPT MODS & ACOUSTIC FACILITY 

FORECAST CAMERA OVERRUN 

BLDG. 101 & 102 MODS: CHAMBER "A" SUPPORT & ACOUSTIC FACILITY 

CCN'S: ACOUSTIC STUDY, POWER SWITCHING. ETC. 

DIRECTED ITEMS: THERMAL SLATS, CER-VIT, DRC4S. 

MODAL SURVEY, ETC. 

CCN'S: FLIP MIRROR, SLIDING MASK, SM STUDY, ETC. . 

DIRECTED ITEMS: DELETE DRY & ADD VIEWER, COMMAND 

MATRIX SWITCHING, UPDATE SDM -1842 FOR FV-1&Z, DELETION 

OF FORECAST CAMERA OVERRUN, ETC. 

MPS TESTING RE-FORECAST 

BLDG. 103 

PROBABLE FUTURE SCOPE: ULE, UTB, SAFSL 10010, 

SPARES, MPS TESTING FV-6 & 7, FIELD EFFORT 

BEYOND CY 68 

Special Handling 

-Seeret- 
111M APP: • • • r 

111,2F E 1 JULY 21M 

pecial Handling 

-Seedoetr 

YSTEM SEGMENT: PHOTOGRAPHIC PAYLOAD 

10 

AS OF: AUGUST 1966 

CONTRACTOR: EASTMAN KODAK CO. 

PROGRAM CONTENT 

- TEST CHAMBERS & FACILITY ITEMS 13, 979,164 

PSS - ANALYSIS, INTERFACES & DOCUMENTATION 235, 311, 773 

- SPECIAL STUDIES 

COAci

DESIGN, FABRICATION, ASSEMBLY, TEST, 

r RELIABILITY, AND RELATED ASE FOR 

SMC DEVELOPMENT & FLIGHT MODELS 

MPS - TEST DEFINITION STUDY 

- LAUNCH & OPERATIONS PLANNING 

SIC CONTRACT 

ITEM #1 SIR 

ITEM #2 R & D 

• 

ITEM #3 SPS 

EFERR,ED ITEMS 

BUILDING 101 9,1&0., 000 

258, 470, 93 

ITEM #2 R & D MMA - ASSEMBLY, TEST, AND RELIABILITY FOR 

5 FLIGHT MODELS 

- DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF 65 PIECES 

OF ASE & EXCHANGE HARDWARE 

MPS FLIGHT PERFORMANCE PREDICTION AND 

POST FLIGHT EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS 

FIELD ENGINEERING SUPPORT 

FOR 5 FLIGHT MODELS 

.ss IR = SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL REQUIREMENTS 

&D = RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT 

= PHOTOGRAPHIC SUBSYSTEM 

OA = CAMERA OPTICAL-ASSEMBLY 

MC = LAB MODULE COMPONENTS 

30, 000, 00 

288,470,93 

SMC = SUPPORT MODULE COMPONENTS 

MPS = MISSION PAYLOAD SYSTEM 

SPS = SPECIAL PURPOSE STRUCTURE 

MMA = MISSION MODULE ASSEMBLY 

Special Handling 

-Beetle& 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

Special Handling 11 

—teeret— PROGRAM CONTENT 

AS OF; 29 OCT. 67 

SYSTEM SEGMENT: PHOTOGRAPHIC PAYLOAD CONTRACTOR: EASTMAN KODAK CO. 

BASIC CONTRACT 258, 470.937 

DEFERRED ITEMS 

ITEM #1 SIR - REVISED REQUIREMENTS 

ITEM #2 R & D - LMSS - ANALYSIS, DESIGN, ASSEMBLY, 

SMSS INTERFACES, CREW UTILIZATION, 

MMA RELIABILITY, AND REDEFINED 

TESTING FOR 5 FLIGHT MODELS 

- DESIGN & FABRICATION OF 287 

PIECES OF ASE & EXCHANGE HARDWARE 

14, 192, 565 

130, 370, 000 

MPS - FLIGHT PERFORMANCE PREDICTION 

AND POST FLIGHT EVALUATION AND 

ANALYSIS 

- FIELD ENGINEERING 

SUPPORT FOR 5 FLIGHT MODELS 

- AFE, ASE SUPPORT STUDY 

LMQTV - DESIGN, FABRICATE & TEST • 

COMPONENTS 

ITEM #3 SPS - BUILDINGS 102 MOD, BUILDING 103. 4. 983,000 

CCN'S - NEGOTIATED 

ITEM #1 SIR - CCN'S 23 & 16 284, 491 

ITEM #2 R & D - ACOUSTIC STUDY, SM STUDY, DRC'S, MDS, INCREASED 3, 418, 500 

FILM SUPPLY, TM SLATS, CER-VIT, REDUNDANT 

FLIP MIRROR, V. 0. DISPLAY, CONFORMAL COATING 

ITEM #3 SPS ADDITION & OVERRUN BLDG. 101 2, 227, 827 

Special Handling 

--Seeret— 
O APPROVED FOR 

410' EA 

12 

Special Handling 

S./ PROGRAM CONTENT* (CONTINUED) AS OF: 29 OCT. 67. 

SYSTEM SEGMENT: PHOTOGRAPHIC PAYLOAD CONTRACTOR: EASTMAN KODAK CO. 

CCN'S - NOT NEGOTIATED 

ITEM #2 R & D - POWER SWITCHING, SLIDING MASK, SDM #2, 11, 217, 000 

MODAL SURVEY COA, TM CLEARANCE, 

UPDATE MDS, SM STUDY 

DIRECTED ITEMS - NOT NEGOTIATED 

ITEM 01 SIR LM ATMOSPHERE 7 32, 000, 

ITEM #2 R & D - VIEWER, COMMAND MATRIX, UPDATE 32, 261, 000 

* THIS PROGRAM CONTENT DOES NOT INCLUDE SM INTEGRATION 

Special Handling 

—Seeret— 

FV-1 & FV-Z, 4L1Z ,SCHEDULE 

PROBABLE FUTURE SCOPE 

ITEM #2 R & D UTB, 10010, SPARES, CER-VIT & ULE 34, 115, 000 

491, 212, 324 
RO APPkovEu I-OH 

LEASE 1 JULY 2015 

Special Handling 14 

--Seeree— PROGRAM CONCEPT 

SYSTEM SEGMENT: PHOTOGRAPHIC PAYLOAD 

AS OF 17 NOV. '67 

CONTRACTOR: EASTMAN KODAK CO. 

ESTIMATE OF REQUIRED 

FUNDING (MILLIONS OF 

DOLLARS) 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 TOTAL 

COMPACT 12 SCHEDULE* 75. 1 152.8 146.2 61.0 38. 1 18.2 0 491.3 

¶ PAC T 12+12 SCHEDULE** 75.1 99.0 100.0 100.0 71.0 39.0 22.9 507.0 

EKC BELIEVES THE PROGRAM CONTENT CONTAINED IN CHARTS 11 & 12 OF THLS SERIES REQUIRES 

THE FUNDING SHOWN ABOVE TO SUPPORT THE ASSOCIATED SCHEDULES, SUBJECT TO THE . 

FOLLOWING 

1) THE SCHEDULE ADJUSTMENT IS ACCOMPLISHED BY (A) DELAYING COMPACT 12 MM 

LEVEL ACTIVITY AT EKC ONE CALENDAR YEAR, AND (B) DELAYING QM AND FM COA 

LEVEL AND LM ACTIVITY AT EKC ONE CALENDAR YEAR, (C) COA AND LM COMPONENT 

DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY IS STRETCHED TO A "2 YEARS WORK IN 3 YEARS" SCHEDULE. 

2) OUR SUBCONTRACTORS ARE ABLE TO MEET BOTH OUR FUNDING BOGIES FOR THEM 

AND ALSO A COMPACT 12+12 SCHEDULE. - 

3) INTERFACE NEGOTIATION IS COMPATABLE WITH OUR TECHNICAL 

AND SCHEDULE REQUIREMENTS. 

4) THERE ARE NO COST DEVIATIONS OR ADDITIONAL WORK IMPOSED. 

*vTE ARE NOT IN A POSITION TO ACCEPT A COM.MITTMENT TO THIS WORK CONTENT AND SCHEDULE. 

**WE ARE IN A POSITION TO ACCEPT A COMMITTMENT TO THIS WORK CONTENT AND SCHEDULE. 

Special Handling 
RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

ESPECIAL HANDLING 

NRO AFF'HUVLIJ FUR 

PROGRAM REVIEW COUNCIL MELTING 

1-34/1-C 

le . 
.'1.=-".ft• • 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

- • • ' I 

rewnri HAt.L„, 711'4,Ri13 • rzit.6„- u.'6 41,„ 

. . 

- FINANCIAL STATUS FY 1963 

SYSTEM SEGMENT: MPSS CONTRACTOR: GENERAL ELECTRIC AS OF Noy 1? 

150 

F FAO; 

• VP 

MILLIONS 

OF 

nov." !ARS 

GOV'T ••••• • • • •• 

IIMMICE111171111111111111111MMIIIIM 

rrIFFIM71. 0111111111111E1.10111111111 111111111'' 

6111- "1.92191 4 '3".1122115351-21 , rMIM 014;" n. 

-92. 

• • • - •••• - 

- A 351•14.- ••,` 

. . 

•"Z?..FrA' 
//KRZTATP ROVED TOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 21315 

5 CR T SPECIAL HANDLING ' 

CHANGES IN FISCAL PROGRAMS 

GE FOLLOWED: 

BELOW THE $127.4M PLAN 

NOW ALLOCATED $106. 2M 

SCCRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

- . ' 
"NR4TXPPRIEW-E430-FOR 

RE 

■ FINANCIAL STATUS 'FY 1968 

MP I= III II • IMP II WM OM ■P'104/P-NO If 111111,NO MI UV ONO III ■111. 

CONTRACTOR BY COST *ELEMENT C12 FrEAN (FOLLOWED SINCE 1 J ULY 67 

- 

FUNDING 

PLAN 

FY67 

ITAL 

(MILLIONS OF.DOUARS) 

I JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MA' APR MAY JUN 

FY68 

TOTAL 

LABOR F s ' ' s 1 t o 1 s. • I : 

A 5.5 (18 0.7 08 1.1 

MATERIAL F 10.8 L7 1.2 1.9 0.8 0.8 1.2 . 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.0 1132 6 

(INC. IDWA)A 5.4 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.8 . 

SUBS f , 1 4 1 • 4 • 2 0 • 1 5 . 1 5 . 1 7 . 2.7 . 2.3 2.3 3.1 2.4 2.5 24.8 

A 4.9 2.2 1 5 1 1 1 1 7 

OTHER (T&L) F 0.1 0.1 0.1 , - 0.1 0.1 - 0.1 - 0.1 - 0.7 

A 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 - 

OVERHEAD, F 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.4 1.8 1.9 2.5, 2.0 2.0 2.5 2.0 2.0 24.7 

&G&ACIRP A 10.1 1.6 1.3 .1.5 2.2 

TOT CONTR F 5.0 6.1 6.4 7.2 5.1 5.5 7.7 63 6.4 8.0 6.5 6.4 76.7 

FXPFND A 26.2 5.7 4.8 5.0 6.8 1 

F PROFIT/FEE 0.4 '0.5 0.510.6 0.4 0.4 5 5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 5.8 

A 2.1 0.5 0.4 0.41 0.6. 

LAC F I 1.2 0.4 1 2.411.2 '1.2 2.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 I 0.6 0.61 0.6 12.6 

Col A 4.1 2.3 0.1 I 3.1 i 0.1 

F I - . 6.617.2 I 9.319.0 1 6.718.3 8.8 I 7.4 7.5 9.11 7.61 7.5195.0 TOTAL A 132.4 8.515.-3 I 8.517.51 

. 

. i HISTORY OF 102. 3124. 9 12$ 1112. 0 

TOT FY 68 _ 

FCS T KIWIS i 

A _ .........„ SPECIAL 

,. ....,... _ I ...slew HANDLING OMIMIIMMIIISIMIiiIMAISIINIMMA0411111, 
1%? 1%8 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 

4*;aaraw ram. 

''..3taMerr f

170 

150 

FISCA4. YEAR 

NROAPPROVFD FflR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

1-1C-RiT-spacuu. HANDLING 

' PROGRAM RhNIDING PLAN 

(RATE/QTR NORMALIZED TO YEAR) 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

SPECIAL HANDLING 

HISTORY OF FUNDING FORECASTS • 

(MILLION OF DOLLARS) 

67 

111111111•110 

32.4 

32.4 

32.4 

324 4 

39.8 

45.4 . 13.6 

41.9 14.4 

41.9 14.4 

13.5 

88.0 40:8 13. 

68.9. 36.9 

C""66 BASELINE 

DEC 66 

MAR 67 

JUN 

COMPACT 12 BASELINE 

JUL 

AUG 67 

SEP 67 

OCT el 

FISCAL YEARS 

69 70 

102.3 113.8, 71.2 

124.9 135.0 81.3 

128.1 139.1 84.3 

112.0 152.1 86.3 

73 TOTAL . 

273.2 

354.0 

363.2 

373.0 

432.6 

410.2 

439.1 

47.1

33.7 

122.7 62.3 30.1 

77.3 99.7. 

33.0 100.2 111.1 

•!: 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELE 

1.1=51.1N3 

BASELINE/DEFERRED/FORECAST DEFINED CFR PROJECTIONS 

250 I 

NUMBER 

OF ITEMS 

= BASELINE W/SCH CHANGE 

1= DEFERRED 

FORECAST DEFINED 

cv.t• • '-- 
RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

•••• ••■ ••• • ■■•e 

'1-EGRS' mom. HANDUNO 

- PROGRAM CONTENT 

BASIC - DESIGN DEVELOP AND TEST: (COMPACT 12 SCHEDULE) 

• 5 PRIME VEHICLES 13 MANNED, 2 AUTOMATIC) FOR 

DELIVERY FROM GE PHILADELPHIA 

AUTOMATIC CHECKOUT EQUIPMENT (3 SETS) & 

MACE • - 

• SIMULATOR & TRAINER FOR VANDENBURG 

DEFERRED 

• SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT QUALIFICATION'AND FIELD 

SUPPORT 

Or LOGISTICS & SPARES PROGRAM 

• ACQUISITION SUBSYSTEM 

• GROUND ALIGNMENT EQUIPMiNT 

IDENTIFIED AND INCLUDED - 71 ITEMS (23 AUTHORIZED & 52 

DEFINED) INCLUDING 

• 1 MAGE VII0C (TY SENSOR AND TESTER. 

• SAFSL 10010 • 

• ADDITIONAL MISS ION MODULE TEST SETS in 

II FLIGHT 1 & 2 

• AUTOMATIC MOE EQUIPMENT 

DOLLARS 

(M111.10NS) 

189 

:122 

to?. 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

PECIAL HANDLING . 

JUSTIFICATION OF FORECASTS 

FY 

FR FOR 68 6. 

)EC 66 

TOTAL 

1 

• REVISED FUNDING FORECAST PROFILE TO CONFORM 

TO PROGRAM PLAN AND FUND umrr 

MAR 67 

• DIRECTED DOOR CHANGE 

• SCHEDULE EXTENSION 

111 INCREASED FIELD SUPPOR 

REQUIREMENT 

• ADDITIONAL ACQUISITION 

S/S TECH REQUIREME 

• ANGULAR ACCELEROMETER 

• IVS TESTER 

• 2D MOL CITE FOR HA 

• POWER INTERRUPT 

• EXTENDED BEARING TESTS 

• INCREASED IVS COSTS le 

• ADDITIONAL ACQUISITION 

TECH REQUIREMENTS t • 

• TRANSFER SIMULATOR 

• COMPUTER DACO • •• 

TO GE' 

• MOL CITE FOR HB 

• ANGULAR ACCELEROM- 

- • ETER • - 

• POWER INTERRUPT 

• . 

• ADDITIONAL COMPUTER 

PROGRAMMING RE-

.QUIREMENTS. 

LOGISTICS SPARE RH-

`, QUIREMENTS 

• SUNNYVALE GROUND 

STATION EFFORT 

4.0. COMPACT 12 DELTA 

• 'UPTON V/IR4 

. . • 

• 8AYSL EX/I 10010 IMPLE.• 

MEIITA'TION 

• DEVIATIONS IN BAWL' 

EMI 10010 REQUIREMENTS 

SPECM, PAMDLINIk 

Alb.wk..A.aemdra 

• THREE SOURCE DEVELOP: 

=NTS FOR rvs HARDWARE j• • 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

/KELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

SPECIAL HANDLING 

TODAY'S UNDERSTANDING VS DEC 66 

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES BETTER DEFINED. 

INTERFACES WELL ESTABLISHED BUT NOT YET COMPLETE.' 

FUNDING PROJECTION NOW REFLECTS ALL IDENTIFIED REQUIREMENTS 

4 I.E., SAFSL 10010, IVS, ETC) 

TEST PROGRAM STILL UNDECIDED 

HOWEVER: 

PROGRAM IS FY FUND LIMITED 

THEREFORE: 

MUST CONTINUE TO REDUCE PROGRAM CONTENT BY 

WORKING STRAWMAN - LIKrPROGRAMS/SCHEDULES. 

- IDENTIFYING ADDITIONAL, COST REDUCTION ITEMS. • 

- TAILOR SCHEDULE TO AVAIL FY FUNDS. 

SPECIAL HANDLING . 
fe411175 APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 201 - 

. •-•,•••••....••••••••■•••••••• ..•."•••••••-, r•••-•••••- 

SPECIAL HANDLING 

HERE tS MY UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROGRAM NOW 

FY FUNDING 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 TOTAL 

(MILLIONS OF $) 32 73 106 90 86 59 20 "3 469 

WITH THE PROGRAM. CONTENT WE HAVE NOW, AS I CAN FORESEE IT, THIS FUNDING WILL 

SUPPORT A SCHEDULE ADJUSTMENT OF: 

APPROXIMATELY 14 MONTHS ADDITIONAL TO THE COMPACT 1 

• 

• TO GET BACK FROM C.12 + 14 MOS TO C 12 + 12 MOS 

415 

FUNDING REQM'TS WOULD BE 

FY FUNDING 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 

(MILLIONS OF $) 32' 79 106 90 83 '56 18 

SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

• 
12502 

GOv'T FUNDING 0,400 

ACTUALS 

CONTR FCST 

2,566 3,082 

10,100 

*50 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

• hNANCIAL STATUS FY 1968 

SYSTEM SEGMENT GMirrNI CONTRACTOR MCDONNET.I. AsTRoNAUTICSDATEREPORT 14 NOV. 1Q67 

' $100 FY G7 SUMMARY 

GOV'T FUND38.700 

ACTUALS $32.200 

 VAR +65.0j0 

29 Oct 67 

..• .0 

. 

do• 

1 • .0". 

./........ 

'0 79. 

Governe eifij 

Ceiline - Fundli/g 

•• • _.59.311 

_ I 9 Oct o Act ue.t. 

to60 

LABOR $9, 510 

MATERIAL 2,608 

SUBS 6,232 

OTHER 4,897 

OVERHEAD 8,905 

PROFIT/FEE 3,295 

COMM RES 8,353 

TOTAL $43,800 

CUMM ACTUALS TO DATE 

- 

MAR APR MAY JUN it TOTAL 

It 

11.92,93.0. 

11 I 

JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

FROM JULY TO SEPTEMBER WE WERE 

FOLLOWING A 68 PLAN OF $104.8 

SINCE OCTOBER WE WERE FOLLOWING 

A68 PLAN OF $97.9 

UNTIL TWX REDUCTION TO $79.5 

OF 8 NOVEMBER 

CHANGES IN FY 68 PROGRAM PLAN 

MC DONNELL 

UNTIL JULY WE WERE FOLLOWING: 

A 68 PLAN OF $108.6 CUMULATIVE 
O APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

• 5 Week Accounting *nth 

FINANCIAL STATUS FY 1968 14 November 1967 

BY COST ELEMENT 

(ix ofousiutre) 

• FY 67 

TOTAL 

It * * W. 

JUL AUff SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN ! FEB MAR APR MAY JUN 

FTbli 

TOTAL 

LABOR 

F 

A 

Rip lo 1078 114 14423. 1078. 6 1107 ljagri 

i 

0 - 

erm _up bin _ 412 727, ____I___. 

F 12010 

MATERIAL 

A 

1161 1290 1021 1122 1226 1204 12010 

11+27 133 M 90 — 1129 

F

A 

SUBS b.............--- 

4215 410 491 

— 683 all laft3 inth 16 165711595_ 

472 6100. 

OTREnt 

F 

A 

_ , 

701 842 920 949 1039 1081 1 U18 

1 

9191 

3272 304 410 447 464 

OVENEA0 F 

EIGBA 

A 

. 3. 

22217t . 

6516 572 437 _ 690 683 

TOT CONTR F 

EXPEND A 

• -i...: •ri •'•+ • • :. • A*: •.•••• le 

r 

km 

2224 2251_ _2511 2943 k .. 

F 

PROM/FEE 

A 2277 211 7 

UNCANC 

CC' 'IT 

TOTAL 

F 

0 MI • • 762 72579 72579 65 

HISTORYOFcsrl 

TOT FY6li 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

42015 

All. t" IbUIL YtIAVS/1.111(t1.1 If 111131F.M1 

. 

SYSTEM SEGMENT: GEmna B CONTPACTOR:C mcDoNNELL AsTRoNAuT/3 AS OF(: .3,‘ Nov _ ,.... 

, 

68 FY 69 FY 70 FY 71 FY 72 

FUNCTION 1 3 4 4 4 4 2 

F 

A 

I 34- ING 

698 •772 777 791 721 307 

A 592 

....Pt A it Li 

412 598 603 669 250 50 

A 2 

\ 

- ; 

g 60 • 136 90 39 

CONTRA/. 1 

IIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIII .. 

A 12 • 

/ 

. AlWRATTANct

i 

F 's • 93 187 

" A 15 

ra .'AL 

DIRECT 

F 1224 1545 1576 1781 1450 793 AT 

TOTAL 

INDIRECT 

 857 1082 not J.2147 io15_555_173 . 

A 650 

TOTAL F 2081 2627 2679. 3028 2465 .: ...,. 

A 1578 

11.••■■ •■••1 WI% IP ICI. POP 

MANPOI.!EP. 
eltr OVED FOR 

APS71 JULY 2015 

SYSTEM SEGMENT: 

MANPOWER , 

CURRENT FY GS DIRECT & INDIRECT 

GEMINI B CONTRACTOR: mitiONNELL ASTRONAUTICS 

1 AS OF: 3.1, Nov. 1961 

BY FUNCTION Jut. AUG SEP OCT Nov DEC APR MAY JUN 

F 700 760 TT7 7TT m 

ENGINEERING A 611 56i 5(19 633 

t- ..; .,; .,; . . • .1 

WiNUFACTUR/NG 217 252 289 304 

... 

IA 

F 

. - ..J3111111111111111111111111,1 

• 

n 

iii 14 

11111111/111111111111P11111 ,a1M.: 

111111t101141111111r1= 

PROJDZIT COMBO 12 _12 11 

. 

iiima 

... .111111111111 a 

REMOTE OPERATI - :35 15 16 MIMI 

. . 

TOT DIRECT — 1111111111111111111 ii. "11111M11 8 11111111MI 111111111111111111 

TOT INDIRECT 

F 862 981. 1063 1063 1063 1080 1080 j.080 A 638 629 682 718 _ 4 

1 

TOTAL F 2093 2390 2581 ra81 2581. P621 .2621 

A 3.5k9 1527 1656 1743 — 1 1 
JUL 67 

AUG 67 

SEP 67 

OCT 67 

_URI) APPRM/Fn Fog_ 

/-.RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 14 November 1967 

• 

HISTORY OF 

FUNDING FORECASTS 

(IN THOUSANDS) ± 

.FISCAL YEARS " 

67 68 69 70 • 71 72 TOTAL 

vEC 66 BASELINE 

• 

DEC 66 59,283 86,257 

MAR 67 37,135 : 68,347 

JUN 67 32,467 76,169 

39,244 15,986 1,358 • 202,127 

78,537 • 56,640 34,658 .3,917 • 279,234 

79,455 • 46.665 33.611 3,694 274,061 

• EXCLUirla OP ANY CHANGES AND SITS, SPARES, PACS, MISSION MANNINO, 

RECOVERY A= WHIM WERE DEFERRED. 

12 COMPACT BASELINE 

32,296 76,238 

32,200 72,579 

32,200 72,579 

32;200 65,710 

86,536 55,712 33,158 4,154 288,094 

87,771 61,669 32,848 4,162 291,228 

87,771 61,669 32,848 4.162 ° 291,228 

93,351 66,453 34:811 5,995 290,520 
PRnvED EL g 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

PROGRAM CONTENT 

(ix =sate) 

BAS IC 

DEFERRED . 

IDENTIFIED & INCLUDED 

rcREcAn - NOT ICE= (STATISTICAL), 

. . 

Those items not Included it1 Contractor's Forecasts, (specific items and 

d MASTER EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE (NES) 

4 COST PLANNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM (CPCS) 

g DELIVERABLE EQUIPMENT ALLOCATION LIST (DEAL) 

1

'RADIATION SEPCIFICATION 

ALTERNATE CONFIGURATIMMANAGEMENT PLAN GBP3 

o SED GBQ 

dollars associated). - 

• 

.300 

4.827 

NOT AVAILABLN. 

NOT AVAILARLS 

.775 
RO APPROVED FOR . 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015- 

$ CHANGES FROM 

FUNDING LIMITATION 

- -4.5 +10.0 +6.0 -10.0 

MC DONNELL-• 

TO REDUCE SCHEDULE TO 

COMPACT 12 + '12 

• - — 
/1 • NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

HERE IS MY UNDERSTANDING 

OF. THE PROGRAM NOW 

FUNDING 67 68 69 70 

32.2 47.3 68.o 50.0 50.0 

32,2 79.500 147.500 197.500 247.5 

• 

With the program content we have now, as can foresee it, this funding will • 

• support a schedule adjusipient of: AN 4DDITIONILL 15 MONTHS TO THE PRESENT 12C 

. c. 

SCHEDULE FOR THE DELIVERY OF THE FIRST GEMINI B FLIGHT ARTICLE .(GBQ)., 

AN ADDITICMAL 16 MONTHS TO THE P1 SENT 12C SCHEDUIE FOR THE DELIVERY OF 

GEMINI B YARNED FLIGHT ARTICIE (AVE 2). 

• • 

THE FIRST 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

R 

TOTAL FUND I NG. REQU I REMENTS 

(EXPENDITURE + PROFIT + COMMITMENTS) 

I 

- - BASI C• 

• - • - 12C 

- - - - - 15C • 

.ACTUALS 
N 

FUNDING HISTORY JUSTIFICATION OF FORECASTS 

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) 

V1710-4A 

DEC 66 TO MAR 67 

JUN 67 TO JUL 67 

INCREASED VISIBILITY, 

SCHEDULE CHANGE TO 12C 

2. INCREASE SCOPE 

ESE NO. 1 

TEST AND OPERATIONS 

ADD AGE FOR PS IA 

ACOUSTIC QUAL 

FAIRING AND TASKS: 

ADDITIONAL TESTING 

MISCELLANEOUS CHANGES 

8:9 

. 86.0 

12.4 

14.2 

23.5. 

2.7 

8.4 

TOTAL 232.6. 

■ 

JUL 67 TO AUG 67 SCOPE CHANGES 

ESE NO. 2 

MISSION MODULE STIFFNESS REQUIREMENTS 

FAIRING ACCOMMODATIONS 

GE FAC IL REQUIREMENTS 

DELETION OF DRV. MISCELLANEOUS CHANGES 

TOTAL 

1.1 

 L3 

8.5 

L1 

<.7> 

.3 

11.6 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

e)il-E-teAtT--1-7t/tY-2171'6'"" 

FUNDING HISTORY JUSTIFICATION OF FORECASTS. V1710-5A 

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) • 

AUG 67 TO SEP 67 

SEP 67 TO OCT 67 

SCOPE CHANGES 

LM DEVELOPMENT FLIGHTS 

HEART RATE RECORDER 

REVISED MOL CISPCS.. 

SAFETY SPECIFICATIONS 

NEW FLIGHT VEHICLE NO. 7- 

ADD DATA REDUCT 

UNDERWATER TESTING 

NO, 2 MISSION SIMULATOR 

DELETE FAIRING 0 Il 

MISCELLANEOUS. CHANGES 

TOTAL 

SCOPE CHANGES 

12C PROPOSAL ADJUST 

.DELETE REV MOL CISPCS 

DELETE ACOUSTIC.QUAL 

DELETE NEW FLIGHT VEHICLE NO. 7 

DELETE NO. 2 MISSION SIMULATOR 

HARDWARE INTEGRATION 

FAIRING Oil 

MISCELLANEOUS CHANGES 

TOTAL 

1.9 

1.7 

3.1 

23:0 

7.0 - 

3.0 

1.0 

32.0 

<14.5> 

4.3 

62.5 

< 3.0 > 

< 3.1> 

< 14.2 > 

< 7.0> 

 <32.0> 

10.0. 

14.5 

< 5.2 > 

( 40.0 > 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

67 68 69 , TOTAL 

687.7 

• . . 

'HI STORY OF FUNDING FORECASTS 

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONSI 

131;9 287.1. 200. 

127.3 281.1 187.1 73.5':.: 

127.3 281.7 187.1 73:5 .18.1 

• 12 COMPACT BASELINE 

JUL 67 

• AUG 67 

• SEP 67 

• OCT 67 (_12C) 

111.9 

95. 1 713.7 

95.1 217.8 

95..1 217.8 

251.4" 

256.7 

272.2 

272.1 

191.6 112.0 58.3 920.3 

191.6 116.0 53.9.931.9. 

198. b 126. 0 86.4 994.4 

182.0 _._111.0 76. 4 .454.4 

V1709-8 

FISCAL YEARS 

• DEC 66 BASELINE 

• DEC 66 

• MAR 67 • 

• JUN 67 
13.580 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

FINANCIAL STATUS FY 1968 V1707-9B 

12 COMPACT BASELINE-., 

SYSTEM SEGMENT VEHICLE CONTRACTOR AIRCRAFT CO. DATE REPORT 29C1- 61 

LABORATORY DOUGLAS WEEK ENDING. 

FY 67 SUMMARY 

GOVT FUNDING 108.003 

ACTUALS 95.085 

VAR' + 12.918 

CURRENT FUNDING 

S186.625 

.. ...

..... 

100 

$259.6141 

Government 

Ceiling 

1119/61 

CUMM ACTUALS TO DATE 

LABOR 28.776 

MATERIAL 2.046 

SUBS 32394 

OTHER 2.664 

' OVERHEAD 45.593 

PROFIT/FEE 10.590 

COMM REST -28.929 

TOTAL 

0 

1 

150.992 

JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN ITOTAL 

17.673 19.840 19.058 19.483 CONTR FCST 1.3.451 13.129 21.560 15.691, 16.713 24.201 22.481 217.779 

ACTUALS 13.994 13.554 14.779 

GOVT FUNDING 33.700 0 4.000 40.922 
12C PROGRAM CONTENT AS OF 29 OCT 1967 • V1709-9A 

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) 

. • . 

IDENTIFIED AND INCLUDED - 

12 C SCHEDULE ADJUSTMENT 

MISSION MODULE STI FFNESS REQUIREMENTS - 

ADD CATL BURNER - 

HEART RATE RECORD REQUIREMENTS 

ADD AGE FOR PS IASAFETY SPEC ATTACH 

ADDITIONAL TESTING . 

ADD DATA REDUCTION 

HARDWARE INTEGRATION 

GE FACILITY REQUIREMENTS AT HUNTINGTON BEACH 

MISCELLANEOUS CHANGES AUTHORIZED PLUS DEFINED 

NOT AUTHORIZED 

TOTAL 

BASIC 

DEFERRED' - 

TEST AND OPERATIONS 86. 

ESE NO. .1 8. 

ESE NO. 2 1.2 

FAIRING AND ACCOMMODATIONS # 31.4 ' 

70.5 1.5 1.4 1.8 12.4,. 23.0 2.7 

10

. 0 - .0 1.0 

11.9 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 
NIRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

• FINANCIAL STATUS FY 1968 

BY COST ELEMENT 

- 12 COMPACT BASELINE 

V1706-9A 

FY 67 

TOTAL JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB 

: • 

.MAR APR MAY JUN 

' 

TOT AL FY 68 

F 

LABOR 

A 

18.647 2.161 1.818 3.236 4.294 2.148 2.849 3.260 3.248 5.230 3.725 3.964 5.072 41.005 

18.647 2.302 2.251 2.272 3.304 - • . 

F 

MATERIAL 

A 

1.224 .160 .200 .290 .293 .483 .800 .870 1.100 1.080 1.280 1.440 ' 1.567 9.563 

1.224 .211 .166 F .154 .291 _ 

'(.., 

. 

F 

SUBS 

A 

14.298 4.706 4.527 1.751 15.711 . 8.067 6.441 6.712 7.871 5.588 .1.570 4.334 3.531 73.909 

14.298 4:148 3.018 - 6.441 4.489 . 

F 

OTHER 

A 

1.804 .225 .145 .220 .370 .157 .223 221 .207 .347 • 232 231 .275 2.853 

1.804 .240 .180 .155 , .285 - 

. 

OVERHEAD F 

AND G & A A 

29.618 3,464 '2.754 5.160 6.813 3.418 4.527 5.204 5.182 8.341 5.939 6.317 8.067 65.185 

29.618 3.690 3.412_, 3.630 5.243 

F TOT CONTR 

EXPEND A 

ek.) .59 1 10.716 9.444 10A57 27.481 14.273 14.840 16.267 17.608 20.686 15.745 16.286 18.512 192.517 

65.591 , 10.591 9.027 12.652 11812 

• ,.. - 

F 

PRur IT/FEE 

A 

6231 1.019 897 1.Q12 2.611 1.357 , 1 A 10 1.545 1.673 1.965 1.496 1.547 ' 1.759 18.289 • 

6.231 1.006 .858 1.202 1.293 . 

• 

UNCANC F 

COMMIT A 

23.263 1.716 2.788 2.830 (8.532) .061 .463 (.139) .559 '1.550 1.187 1.650 2.210 - 6.973 

23.263 

- 

2.397 3.669 (.274) I.126) 

TOTAL 

F-96.085 

A 

13.45t 13.129 14.449 21.560 15.691 16.713 17.673 19.840. 24.201 19.058 .19.483 22.481 217.779 

95.085 13.994 13.554 13.580 14.779 

HISTORY OF 

TOT FY68 

FOST 

211.9001213.700E217.779 217.779 I - I • i• I 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

CHANGES IN FY 68 PROGRAM PLAN — DOUGLAS 

• 

UNTIL FEBRUARY WE WERE FOLLOWING A 68 PLAN 

OF $407.2 MILLION CUMULATIVE., 

• 

FROM FEBRUARY UNTIL OCTOBER WE WERE-FOLLOW I isiG 

A 68 PLAN OF $312.9 MILLION CUMULATIVE.. 

FROM OCTOBER UNTIL NOVEMBER WE WERE FOLLOWING: 

A 68.PLAN OF $288.3 MILLION CUMULATIVE. - 

WE ARE NOW FOLLOWING A 68 PLAN,QF $69. 6-MILLION CUMULATIVE. 

• 

• ,• 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

REL 

MANPOWER 

CURRENT FY 68 D I RECT AND INDIRECT . 

- 12 COMPACT BASELINE 

SYSTEM SEGMENT: CONTRACTOR: 

LABORATORY VEHICLE DOUGLAS AIRCRAFT CO • 

V1707-1 

AS OF: _ 

W/E 29 OCT 67 

BY FUNCTION JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 'JAN- FEB MAR APR • MAY JUN 

SYSTEM 

DEVELOPMENT 

F 405 364 383 . 393 387 375 348 327 328. 318 310 

A 321 334, 367 383 

DEVELOPMENT 

ENGINEERING 

F 1388 1406 1505 1533 1796 1798 1798 1808 1869 :1938 1992 

A 1268 1348, . 1410 1582 

CONFIGURATION 

MANAGEMENT 

F 14 - 14 14 15 • 15 5 15 16 16 16 17 17 17 

A 10 10 10 12 

PROGRAM 

INTEGRATION 

F 87 84 109 108 118 117 117- 117 115 115 111 117 

A 63 , .62 84- 88 

F • 110 125 1.220 204 240 275 329 362 383 400 402 

A 87 99 100 107 

LOGISTICS 

SUPPORT 

F 60 60 67 .68 813 7 75 77 79 82 86 

A 54 49 - 51 58 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

• 

, . 

BY FUNCTION 

MANPOWER ' . V1707-2A 

CURRENT FY 68 DIRECT AND 1 ND I RECT 

12 COMPACT BASEL! NE 

. 

SYSTEM SEGMENT:- CONTRACTOR: AS OF 

LABORATORY VEHICLE DOUGLAS A I RCRAFT CO . W/E 29 OCT 67- 

JUL . AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN • FEB . MAR APR MAY JUN 

F 50 71 87 105 174 250 324 401 477 553 630 710 

MANUFACTURING 

A 41 45 . 70 92 ' '11 

PLANNING AND F 69 83 97 102 164 177 185 195 202 209 . 215 248 

PROCUREMENT A ,' 70 ' 85 . .99 131 

TOOLING 

F 1115 175 213 ' 233 368 442 472 500 529 546 552 563 

A 128 178 262 

_ t . 

RELIABILITY 

F 37 44 55 • 67 86 98 123 141 166 194 199 208 

A 31 35 ' 45 47,' 

ENGINEERING 

Dr 'ELOPMENT ' 

C. ,ffiTIONS 

F 90 115 124 , 1 . 

142 , 152 175 184 189 - 213 222. 234 

A 76 .58 82 - , di' . 

TOTAL DIRECT 

F 2423 2541 .2874 2961 3556 3768 - 3973 4149 4352 4602 4742 4936 

A 2149 2301 

- 

2560 2914 - - 

..... 

 m 

1 • , 

3208 1— 

,T TAL INDIRECT 0

F 1575 1652 '1868 1925 2311 2449 2582 2697 2828 2991 3082 

A 1397 1496 1664 1894 - . 

- 

- , 

TOTAL 3996 4193 4742 6217 6555 6846 7180 7593 7824 8143 

A 3646 3797 4224 

A 

4608 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

(e.,. RE... LEA SE1 JULY 2(115 

HERE I S MY UNDERSTAND I NG OF THE PROGRAM NOW V1710-3 

(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) 

67 

1 

69 70 71 72 

95.1 164.5 226.0 190.0 163.0 120 0 I.51.4 

FUNDING 

WITH THE PROGRAM CONTENT WE HAVE NOW, AS I CAN FORSEE IT, TRI S 

FUNDING WILL SUPPORTA SCHEDULE ADJU.STAAENT OF: SEVEN1 (7) MONTH 

SLIP IN FLIGHT VEHICLE NO. 3 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEA JULY 2015 

WHS-538 

Copy 

Pages: 8 

16 November 1967 

0)1 NG 

PROGRAM COST REDUCTION 

CONSIDERATIONS 

ti 

D IECIISSFECIE HAN L 
WHS-538. 

Page 2 D IFSEITSPElla NADU NG) 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 

CONCEPTS 

o SCHEDULE SLIDE ALONE WILL NOT SOLVE FISCAL CRISIS 

o DELETIONS IN THE PROGRAM REQUIRED - PARTICULAR EMPHASIS 

NEEDED ON DELETIONS AFFECTING MANNING REQUIREMENTS 

FOR FY 68; DELETIONS OF TESTS NEEDED FOR FY 69 

o , GROUND RULES FOR CANDIDATES 

WILL NOT UNDERMINE ULTIMATE OBJECTIVE OF OBTAINING 

UNMANNED SYSTEM 

WILL NOT UNDERMINE DEMONSTRATION OF MANNED 

CAPABILITY OR RATIONALE FOR MANNED APPROACH 

D 3EiRETipEcinl 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 

(DrStheitE-T—SPECIAL HANDLING 

STRAW MAN SYSTEM COST REDUCTION PROGRAM 

WHS -538 

Page 3 

ITEM 

ELIMINATE FLIGHT 2 

ASSEMBLE ON PAD 

CHECKOUT CAPABILITY 

PROGRAM GAIN/IMPACT 

o DELETION OF HARDWARE 

o LATER SCHEDULING OF 

FLIGHT 1 HARDWARE AND 

SUPPORT REQUIREMENTS 

o REDUCED TOTAL TIME OF 

LV CHECKOUT 

AGE AT GE AND DAC 

RISK ASSESSMENT 

o INCREASED, BUT 

STATISTICAL 

o PRIMARILY SCHEDULE 

o DELETION OF LOW LEVEL 

SHAKE 

o PRIMARILY SCHEDULE 

o REDUCTION OF HUNTINGTON 

BEACH SUPPORT REQUIREMENTS 

ELIMINATION OF SECOND o ELIMINATION OF 1 SET OF 

o REDUCTION IN SUPPORT, 

ASSEMBLY & CHECKOUT 

FUNCTIONS 

o REQUIRES ELIMINATION 

OF LMQTV ACOUSTIC 

QUALIFICATION 

o OPENING OF LAUNCH CENTERS 

REDUCE GE AVE TESTING o SIMPLIFICATION OF MISSION o REDUCTION IN CONFIDENCE 

AT ROCHESTER MODULE TEST SET 

o REDUCTION OF PROFILE 

TESTING 

o ELIMINATION OF SIMULATED 

DYNAMICS TES TS 

o REDUCTION OF GE TEST 

SUPPORT 

(D) 4gGiker-12.-SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

• RELEASE 

JO:1PM BBL 

STRAW MAN SYSTEM. COST REDUCTION PROGRAM (CONT'D) 

WHS-538 

Page 4 

o SIMPLIFICATION OF 

HARDWARE TEST FLOW 

o USING SAME MISSION MODULE o PRIMARY- MODE CONFIDENCE 

SUBSTITUTE AT HUNTINGTON • RETAINED 

BEACH THROUGHOUT TEST 

PROGRAM 

1 

o REDUCTION, IN SYSTEM o 30-DAY DURATION DEMONQUALIFICATION DURATIONS . STRAVED ON ORBIT 

AND BACKUP MODE TESTING 

1 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

, RELEASE 1 J V 9-n 1-C 

(D)....t.E.GR-€4P-SPECIAL HANDLING WHS- 53 8 

Page 5 

TYPICAL ADDITIONAL ITEMS UNDER CONSIDERATION 

o COMMITMENT TO GO T LOW COEFFICIENT MATERIAL 

- ELIMINATION OF LOUVERS 

- 2-POSITION SLIDING MASK 

o ELIMINATION OF SECONDARY PLATEN 

- ELIMINATION OF PROCESSOR 

- ELIMINATION dF UNFUNDED VIEWER 

o SIMPLIFICATION OF VISUAL OPTICS 

SINGLE POWER ON HIGH POWER SYSTEM 

- ELIMINATION OF ALPHA NUMERICS, DEROTATION, AND 

LOW POWER RANGE ON ATS 

• 

(D)IELSR4Z-SPECIAL HANDLING 
L Q TV LM 7'Y 

STRUcr 

r

ukos,e4.1.441nopeibiftoummossom irs# 

; 

£c/ 4S I r te.f) EV. QUAL 715s7-1 4 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 WHS - 53 8 

Page 6 

f. JQvi.9t77 6^ 

70 /53 7/ 

(D)-51'eit-FT-T- SPECIAL HANDLING 

S ON 

HO 4 A -misrE See( A/oto /67 

1301111112511!2 A. "4E140 

Ar 3 

vAraI 

clo I 

FY-3 

1/6 A Z. 

' '(D) 'SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 

. . 

E OCT (.1 VE SOArWAR 

rt 0A1 

v3 (4' 

••••• web ■ arm ma* 

LV PY11 

• G, E; EA( zwezhjiiir A1t-1Sr4r1c J 

IzIdsrArvci 

NixiSS • 

• 

'11' 

A 

V,E oPme."..7 resr 

e 

7"44L. reclr 

1 

11144c. YES? 

//4- DOVE-4 oPii /yr rEsr 1 . 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEA SE 1 2015 

(D) SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING WHS - 538 

Page 7 

TEST FLOW - SCHEDULE ADJUSTMENTS 

20 OCTOBER 1967 BASELINE TO 3 NOVEMBER 1967 PROPOSED BASELINE 

(START DATE) 

1968 1969 1970 1971 

4 1/2 MO (1 MO COMP) 

114 2 WEEK SETBACK 

1---4 3 MO. (3 MO COMP) 

4 1/2 MO 

3 MO 

`6 1/2 MO 

5 MO 

31/2M0 

3 MO 

1-4 1 MO 

3. MO 

3 MO 

4 1/2 MO 

I-4 4 MO. 

MO ( 2 MO COMP) 

F----•1 3 MO (2 MO COMP) 

s• i 3 MO 

GE THERMAL TEST 

STRUCTURAL TEST 

DEVELOPMENT TEST 

QUALIFICATION TEST 

FV 3 ASSEMBLY 

DAC STRUCTURAL TEST 

ACOUSTIC AND DYNAMIC 

LM STATIC 

MM STATIC 

QUAL VEHICLE ASSEMBLY 

FV 3 ASSEMBLY 

ECLS 

EDCTU 

EK STRUCTURAL TEST 

THERMAL TEST 

ENGINEERING DEV TEST 

QUALIFICATION TEST 

FV 3 ASSEMBLY 

(D) SECRET SPECIAL HANDLING 
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 

Tre ,TA R 

r ) N L: WHS-538 

Page 8 

SUMMARY OF STRAW MAN PROGRAM 

o REPROGRAMMING AND DELETION CAN EFFECT SIGNIFICANT 

REDUCTION IN FY 68 ACTIVITIES 

SOME ALLEVIATION OF FY 69 ACTIVITIES CAN BE ACHIEVED 

• 

o FY 70 BEARS THE BRUNT OF THE TEST PROGRAM 

o STRAW MAN REPROGRAMMING INCREASES SCHEDULE RISK SUBSTANTIALLY 

TECHNICAL RISK IS ALSO INCREASED • 

-sEciu-spEn riANDL I N CA