alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1270 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1270

  To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to reauthorize hydroelectric 
    production incentives and hydroelectric efficiency improvement 
                  incentives, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 11, 2015

  Mr. Gardner introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to reauthorize hydroelectric 
    production incentives and hydroelectric efficiency improvement 
                  incentives, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reliable Investment in Vital Energy 
Reauthorization Act'' or the ``RIVER Act''.

SEC. 2. HYDROELECTRIC PRODUCTION INCENTIVES.

    Section 242(g) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 
15881(g)) is amended by striking ``each of the fiscal years 2006 
through 2015'' and inserting ``each of fiscal years 2016 through 
2025''.

SEC. 3. HYDROELECTRIC EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT.

    Section 243(c) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 
15882(c)) is amended by striking ``each of the fiscal years 2006 
through 2015'' and inserting ``each of fiscal years 2016 through 
2025''.
                                 <all>
```
August 15, 2013



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MATTHEW R. PHILLIPS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00487

- CV V.

DISCOVER BANK , Appellee

_________ _______________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Discover Bank, signed February 21, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant, Matthew R. Phillips, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
201~ APR 24 AH IO: 31 

3676 Davis Road N.W. • Dover, Ohio 44622 • (330) 343-7711 • 1-800-321-8805 • Fax: (330) 364-9626 

April11, 2014 

Document Controls Office 7 407 M 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW 

Washington, DC 20460-0001 

ATTN: Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2013-0399 

CBIC Control Number 

359681 

Re: Endorsement of CPIA Comments on the Proposed Significant New Use Rule 

for CAS 1417900-96-9 (P-12-539), 1401947-24-0 (P-13-107), and 1402738-52-6 

(P-13-109) 

To Whom It May Concern: 

Dover Chemical Company has reviewed the comments submitted by the Chlorinated 

Paraffins Industry Association (CPIA) in response to the February 10, 2014 (79 FR 7621) 

proposed Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) on CAS Number 1417900-96-9 (P-12-539), 

CAS number 1401947-24-0 (P-13-107), and CAS Number 1402738-52-6 (P-13-109) and 

fully supports and endorses these comment on the propose SNUR. 

Tim Nowicki 

Manager Product Compliance 

Dover Chemical Corporation 

tnowicki@doverchem.com 

330-365-3610
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     710
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,297
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,025
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,729
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       710
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,705)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.006)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.006)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Plains Resources Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jere C. Overdyke,
Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(S)1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

To the best of my knowledge, after reasonable investigation:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.





Dated:  August 7, 2002.

                                                /s/ Jere C. Overdyke, Jr.
                                               --------------------------------
                                               Jere C. Overdyke, Jr.
                                               Chief Financial Officer




                                       1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
 DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND DECEMBER 31, 1998 YEAR-TO-DATE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 AS REPORTED ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY  BY REFERENCE
 TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001014920
<NAME>                        Optika Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                                       <C>             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             12-MOS          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1999     DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          3,359           6,811
<SECURITIES>                                    3,823           1,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   4,741           4,571
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0               0
<INVENTORY>                                         0               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               12,478          12,893
<PP&E>                                          5,788           5,319
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,170)         (2,183)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 18,097          18,537
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           6,741           6,717
<BONDS>                                             0               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0               0
<COMMON>                                            7               7
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,349          11,813
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   18,097          18,537
<SALES>                                        11,457          11,128
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               21,765          18,547
<CGS>                                             821             434
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   4,768           3,708
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               18,595          21,443
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (300)           (218)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,298)         (6,386)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (454)         (1,276)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (844)         (5,110)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0               0
<CHANGES>                                           0               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (844)         (5,110)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.12)           (.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)           (.73)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          59,837
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,523
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,922
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,207
<PP&E>                                          26,254
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,073
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 209,277
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,850
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            94
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,307
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   209,277
<SALES>                                         15,010
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,149
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,847
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   396
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,996
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,319
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,677
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,677
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18


</TABLE>
# C_2005082EN.01002302.xml

| 2.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/23

---

Action brought on 14 February 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-71/05)

(2005/C 82/47)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 14 February 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Mikko Huttunen, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt, and in any event to notify to the Commission, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 March 2002 on the establishment of rules and procedures with regard to the introduction of noise-related operating restrictions at Community airports, (1) the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt, and in any event to notify to the Commission, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 March 2002 on the establishment of rules and procedures with regard to the introduction of noise-related operating restrictions at Community airports, (1) the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| 2. | order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of the directive into national law expired on 28 September 2003.

---

(1)  OJ No L 85, 28.3.2002, p. 40.

1

---
# C_2004190EN.01000501.xml

| 24.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/5

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) by order of that court of 18 March 2004 in the case of Finanzamt Heidelberg (Heidelberg Tax Office) against iSt Internationale Sprach- und Studententreisen GmbH.

(Case C-200/04)

(2004/C 190/07)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the (Bundesfinanzhof (Federal Finance Court) of 18 March 2004, received at the Court Registry on 5 May 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Finanzamt Heidelberg (Heidelberg Tax Office) against iSt Internationale Sprach- und Studententreisen GmbH, on the following question:

Does the special scheme for travel agents set out in Article 26 of Directive 77/388/EEC (1) also apply to transactions entered into by an undertaking which organises ‘High School Programmes’ and ‘College Programmes’ involving periods of three to ten months spent in a foreign country, which are offered to participants by the undertaking in its own name and which are provided using services performed by other taxable persons?

1

---

(1)  OJ L 145, p. 1.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AS OF MARCH
31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              19,755
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      104,917
<ALLOWANCES>                                         3,125
<INVENTORY>                                         32,488
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   165,364
<PP&E>                                              41,659
<DEPRECIATION>                                      23,393
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     226,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              101,962
<BONDS>                                              7,290
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               404
<OTHER-SE>                                         109,280
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       226,181
<SALES>                                            147,517
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   232,354
<CGS>                                               75,277
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      125,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,786
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     29,953
<INCOME-TAX>                                        11,980
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 17,409
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        17,409
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.03
        


</TABLE>
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 3 KiLY 2015 

1 1 

Policy: y101_, 

Lt. Col. yard V4 Hillary VG47 

DI:et:tor of Warrant= 

Deportment of the Air rout* 

rea:-!Varrers Speee Systeme Divittion.WW) 

AP it, Post Office 

Loa AngsletoCalifornia 90045 

St=cir: leforeatien "olio Ma NCIL 

Dear Colonel laIlex: 

meezenco rtn, letter 2 Deo 66 conteming the identification 

of the 1501, Prost= which vas tea ts:fed in a list of space programs active 

at General Metricsill G.I. rocreiting advottlaing. 

General Metric• treZrets that it aliStateroreted the Mt inforeation 

policies as outlined in the briefing by the four different Air Verse and 

DOD representatives* Eimnbast V. talon BerilialMip astd 3t. Pattkanacs 

"rab 66 et 3M. lemitato Otti on has been.taken to tame those 

policies will be strictly followed at all nista*. 

lir. Eugene Alberts*Cast of Sciarity InviersAancis Systems 

and I aiseuzsed specLie clearance probien rotating to a proposed G.E. 

art:xl.. on Mt DIX ix tera4 tee in the Ccengany, and during try tie Acme 

comorsatiors we both reviewed the rim Inforvretien Pcflicyseleventh 

recruiting edvartistas in the style toted in Ws letter was not discussed. 

tle sincerely recognise the ML Wm :lotion Policy he rontractual 

requirertect and inte et ell tizike to 'adhere to it. Zhe described 

'deviation tothis polity was a melt of an neinteational error on oy 

part deo to bed notes that I took at the 13 Feb 0 =atlas at SEM. 

Copies of your VS have been-sent to all partinent l Lst 

porsonmal as well as other G.Z. aetivities concerned with =A real and 

to toter: so of ittletzuatien *boot MA. Invoiced prograus. I parsonelly 

have talked to these c pimple about the T owl we have written to 

sacentractora sten* the Policy. Please be assured that vo have done 

the necessary cortansitations of this Policy end we have the oh for 

clearance alad interpretation of the Policy in place end operettas. 
1 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 • 

• 

Decoeber 1966 

Sloe* the robrualy trootitz our system bat tor/cod wen except fot boot 

Incident= (I) ixtadia=tei clear4tte WV diet rather thao 

tbroutb t proper clutzeip $SD Cm 11:m14.101y otattteted toutstroation 

vitt' Gm Mertz). eel (2) the rttstatorpro,totton a wins do lam* 

19:14 to o ___ f at Ulf* C. (Wool tuvaugut i umWittlAS *34teli48" 

sth, eite regret be ectstoterpretations, ittd have taken tbe 

meet/sexy tetIoto to pretext ottr-cooftweizto to Os lefrtzettotsPolicy. .,; 

SteStopo 

410* 4. Dutteguer 

rg Ate UAW= 

Stinitt.3 04 Cat Burtee) 

SAM OW nano) 

truly vows* 

no, gArraltIgittAijoi at a 

.ZaforastIca : . • 

1104 roptrit*** 

Air 

L r6 

of the 

to tbe 

izaoyee re Lationli 

cS infoantritl.on on, 

1 

:• 

. . . 

„' !'; • ;,:. T.; 3‘.*ir•J' I7GAr 

; • • 

Copy to: Joe 

SAY:M-3 (Lt Col 3';rton) 

4.• -(;;Ia.) • 

•
----

Note concerning the entry into force of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Lebanon, of the other part

With the instruments notifying completion of the procedures required for entry into force of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Lebanon, of the other part (1), signed in Luxembourg on 17 June 2002, having been exchanged on 14 February 2006, the Agreement entered into force on 1 April 2006, in accordance with Article 92 thereof.

----

(1)OJ L 143, 30.5.2006, p. 2.

----
3/4/15

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Review of Ready Biodegradability Study for CASRN 6381-77-7, D-erythro-Hex-2-enoic 

acid, .gamma.-lactone, monosodium salt 

FROM: David G. Lynch

Assessment Branch 5

Risk Assessment Division

TO: John Schaeffer 

Chemical Control Division

THRU: Nhan T. Nguyen

Chief, Assessment Branch 5

Risk Assessment Division

The study titled D-erythro-Hex-2-enoic acid, .gamma.-lactone, monosodium salt [CASRN 6381-77-7] : 

Assessment of Ready Biodegradability : CO2 Evolution Test conducted by Harlan Laboratories LTD 

(Harlan Study Number 41401177) for Univar USA Inc dated January 28, 2015 has been reviewed. The 

study was submitted to fulfill Ready Biodegradability testing requirements under the TSCA section 4 

HPV2 test rule. 

The study was conducted in compliance with UK GLP standards. The biodegradation method was based 

on OECD Guideline 301B, Ready Biodegradability: CO2 Evolution Test and EPA OCSPP Guideline 

835.3110 Ready Biodegradability.

The criteria for validity, i.e., reference compound biodegradation, non-inhibition of microorganisms by 

the test substance, acceptable differences between extremes of replicate values, total CO2 in inoculum 

controls at the end of the test, and percent of inorganic carbon in test system at the beginning of the 

test relative to the total carbon. The test is considered valid and the study is acceptable to meet the 

requirements for Ready Biodegradability testing.

The results indicate that the test substance biodegraded 70% over the 28 day test period and satisfied 

the 10-day window criteria where 60% biodegradation must be observed within 10 days of 

biodegradation exceeding 10%. Thus the test substance can be classified as readily biodegradable.

Please contact me at 564-8532 if you have any questions.
Colonel Clifton Hoskins and Hoskins s



# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

July 16, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00859

- CV

Leonard K. HOSKINS

, Appellant

v.

Colonel Clifton HOSKINS and Hoskins Inc., Appellee

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 03136 Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judg e Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief in Excess of 7,500 Words is GRANTED.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 16th day of July, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court