alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
J. 

J. 

.. • - 

statutes, and the imposed sentence is within the statutory limits and is 

not unreasonably disproportionate to his crimes. NRS 193.330(1)(a)(1); 

NRS 199.480(1)(a); NRS 200.366(2); NRS 200.380(1). Therefore we 

conclude that his sentence does not constitute cruel and unusual 

punishment. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the conviction AFFIRMED. 

i rsus. , J. 

Douglas 

cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge 

Law Offices of John P. Parris 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A oate. 

2
#### Polichinski, Plaintiff in error, vs. The State, Defendant in error.

*April 4*

April *29, 1930.*

*578The cause was submitted for the plaintiff in error on the brief of *Reilly & Cosgrove*of Fond du Lac, and for the defendant in error on that of *L. E. Gooding,*district attorney for Fond du Lac county, the *Attorney General,*and /. *E. Messer schmidt,*assistant attorney general.

Rosenberry, C. J.

The practice in this case is most extraordinary. The record of a court is a solemn memorial of its doings in the case to which it relates. It imports verity and is conclusive as to those matters upon which it speaks. Proceedings to correct or amend a record are well known and well established in the law. The attempt to amend this record by stipulation of the parties without referring the matter to the trial court which made up the record is, so far as we are able to ascertain, entirely without precedent in the law. It is needless to say that it is wholly ineffective. The circuit court should not have considered it and we shall not consider it.

It is hardly necessary to' cite authority to sustain so elementary a proposition of law. See 15 Corp. Jur. p. 971, §§ 382, 395, and cases cited; 23 Ruling Case Law, p. 158, § 7, and cases cited.

Upon the sole question attempted to be raised in the case on the allegations contained in the affidavit, which is that the court abused its discretion in denying defendant a continuance, we may say for the benefit of the parties we should have arrived at the same conclusion if the record had been properly amended. No harm is done in this case, but cases might arise in which irreparable injury would result to the rights of parties if the irregular procedure adopted in this case was followed.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03176]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research (#1203); 
Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC), 
University of Utah Site Visit.
    Dates & Times:
May 27, 2015; 7:15 p.m.-9:00 p.m.
May 28, 2015; 7:15 a.m.-8:30 p.m.
May 29, 2015; 7:15 a.m.-4:00 p.m.
    Place: University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
    Type of Meeting: Part open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Daniele Finotello, Program Director, 
Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers Program, Division 
of Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-4676.
    Purpose Of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning further support of the MRSEC at the University of Utah.

Agenda

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

7:15 p.m.-9:00 p.m. Closed--Briefing of panel.

Thursday, May 28, 2015

7:15 a.m.-4:30 p.m. Open--Review of the MRSEC.
5:00 p.m.-6:45 p.m. Closed--Executive Session.
6:45 p.m.-8:30 p.m. Open--Dinner.

Friday, May 29, 2015

7:15 a.m.-9:50 a.m. Closed--Executive Session.
9:50 a.m.-4:00 p.m. Closed--Executive Session, Draft and Review 
Report.
    Reason For Closing: The work being reviewed during the site 
visit may include information of a proprietary or confidential 
nature, including technical information; financial data, such as 
salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the MRSEC. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) 
and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 11, 2015.
Suzanne Plimpton,
Acting Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-03176 Filed 2-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCTC IV Assignor Corp. (the "registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|            |  |                            
|----------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:       |  |                            
|May 4, 2011 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|            |  |                            
|            |  | John P. Manning            
|            |  | Principal Executive Officer
|            |  |                            
|            |  |                            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
*June 11, 1930.*

#### Woldt, Appellant, vs. Leiterman, Respondent.

For the appellant: *Kittell, Joseph, Young & Everson*of Green Bay.

For the respondent:- *Sheridan, Evrard & Evrard*and *Clarence Dorschel,*all of Green Bay.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE
                                     TO THE
                   GLOBALTRON CORPORATION STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

         WHEREAS, Globaltron Corporation (the "Company") maintains the
Globaltron Corporation Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan");

         WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10 of the Plan, the Board of Directors may
at any time amend the Plan; and

         WHEREAS, the Board of Directors desires to amend the Plan.

         NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 10 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby
amended, effective as of April 30, 2001, as follows:

         1.       The first sentence of Section 4.1(a) of the Plan is amended in
                  its entirety to read as follows:

                  "The aggregate number of shares of Common Stock which may be
                  issued or used for reference purposes under this Plan or with
                  respect to which Awards may be granted under this Plan shall
                  not exceed 4,000,000 shares of Common Stock (subject to any
                  increase or decrease pursuant to Section 4.2); provided,
                  however, that, notwithstanding the foregoing, the number of
                  shares of Common Stock with respect to which Awards of
                  Incentive Stock Options may be granted under this Plan shall
                  not exceed 3,000,000 shares of Common Stock (subject to any
                  increase or decrease pursuant to Section 4.2)."

         2.       Section 11.2 of the Plan is amended by deleting "50,000" and
                  substituting "150,000" in lieu thereof.

         3.       A new Section 11.8 is added to the Plan to read as follows:

                  "11.8 Special One-Time Grant. In addition to the Stock
                  Options granted pursuant to Section 11.2, each Non-Employee
                  Director serving on the Board on April 30, 2001 shall, subject
                  to the terms of the Plan, be granted a Stock Option to
                  purchase 75,000 shares of Common Stock as of April 30, 2001.
                  Stock Options granted pursuant to this Section 11.8 shall have
                  the same terms and conditions as the Stock Options granted
                  pursuant to Section 11.2."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be
executed this 30th day of April, 2001.

                                         GLOBALTRON CORPORATION



                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Name:
                                         Title:
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05112286 . lllllllllllllllllllllllllll 111111111111111111 14 , 

TOP SEeRET 

October 8, 1969 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD 

On October 2 I was called by DIA, who asked my approval 

for accessing five individuals to serve as a subpanel on intelligence 

to the Fitzhugh Blue Ribbon Defense Panel. The individuals were: 

BYEMAN 

CO NTROl SYSTEM 

Mr. Jackson, Mr. Powell and Mr. c'=====---------------------------= Since DIA was not able to provide any details on this 

HANDLE VlA 

arrangement, I asked the genesis of the request. I was told that 

Mr. Froehlke's new office had asked. 

I called ~------~to understand more about the request. 

Schufelt explained that the first four were about ready to begin their 

subpanel efforts and thatl I had not yet tined them. In 

discussing their informational need I suggested to I that we 

access them BYECOM only since their requirement for information 

in our program was only very slight and only to the extent of understanding that it did exist. I I agreed. I called DIA back and 

authorized a BYECOM access for each of the individuals. 

Please not;:.._e::___:_t_:_::h_:_:a-'t======;-~is already cleared into several 

projects as is who serves on the Land Panel. 

Copy to SS-3 

WILLJV YOST 

ColonefM i@AF 

CONTROL NO ______ _ 

BYEMAN TOP SEeRET COPY ___ OF ___ COPIES 

CONTROL SYSTEM EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

DOD DIRECTIVE 5200 10 DOES NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05112286 

PAGE ___ OF ___ PAGES
much material to substantiate the Presented. supporting information
has been presented regarding the changes. It is requested that such
information be supplied either ‘as reports or as part of the recular <!
reporting systen. .Thip information should. be prior to any significant . ;
expenditures along the lines of the changes mentioned. In particular, '
the following data should be included: refer to Inclosure (a) of MsD/20302) i,
, :
del . .
la. Characteristics el environnen’ vehicle
- Aneduding: of the X-l17 as an tal test
Cost
Payload
*ititude
Accelerations
Stability

. DOWNGRADED AT 12 YEAR ©
INTERVALS; NO1 Au sOMATICALLY

DECLASSIFIED. DOD DIR 5200.10 °



2. 7. is uot epnctad that « firm weight Linttation for the 65
Diviatcn agrees frsrel principal tareeing in sroting able
Division with the

_ weight ao long os vertintdle gains in peyloed avcree fren atch such increase,

3e Fisch af te Beaten bivision 4s particularly interested
in a detailed comparison the Hustler ant second stage languard engines, Rough
Sore a iarees gain in payloed will result fron

clude appraisal of the followings -
(a) Relative reliability
(b) Relative cost

,{0)Peload disferences fora redlistis gross weight and
trajectory due tos

5;
te . @ Srectte tapas inelnding propellant comme by ..

(2) Propeiaten systen weight

(3) Different mixture vetidheontect tolerances (different
propellant utilization).

(h) Dicrorene in weight of inst eaey-tirogh ‘trustures
Decause of different thrusts of the two engines. "

Sumary of | blems in Hustler engine because af
different attttade ; Pre oo . 7
(e) Relative difficulty of varying promision progren,
(ft) cto, Tevenont #0 countdown fine Launch crew requirements,

checkout equipment,

coast-doun, “(®) Cees entering Wy tart ang

of residual fe
for both Systens, (2) ? ioe ad Pressure for postecut off control

and traje: * (4) Bet ete i thr ps esrcy

hehe
competing Xt tt er i i

4-5. ARDS Of Minttradk eyetem shes be senridered, oes 3s
* An. No additional data required - :

AT. Wo addtional data required. §
w 56-011022



- Se ae

| —_-SONFIBENT-

3- The requost for Lockheed Airoreft Corporation for'2.6 million of
goverment financing for the Captive Systens Test facility is at variance with
their cost estimate of March 1956, Since Lockheed stated willingness to provide
all brick and nortat at or near their plant had a considerable influence in
theix selection as contractor, 2t is felt that further pressure should be
brought to bear'to encourage them to provide all non severables for this Systen
Test Facility. . . :

at this the

Proposed team until it is reasonably complete. ‘
~ SIGNED
1 Incl: FREDERIC C. BE, ODER
, Contractor's Froposal Ite Colonel, USAF
subject as above. Assistant for tS 117L

. .

GAR, ped ot
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Effective date:*                         February 6, 2015.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 30, 2015, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Contract 110 to Competitive Product List*. Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2015-29, CP2015-38.                

Stanley F. Mires,

Attorney, Federal Requirements.

[FR Doc. 2015-02364 Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# Guides and Instructions

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Resources 

### Wetland Restoration (Ac.) (657) Conservation Practice Standard

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Wetland Restoration (Ac.) (657).

Wetlands

### Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management (Ac.) (644) Conservation Practice Standard

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Wetland Wildlife Habitat Management (Ac.) (644).

Wildlife HabitatWetlandsWildlife

### Wetlands - Montana Resources

Information about wetlands from NRCS Montana.

MontanaWetlands

### Wildlife - Montana Resources

Information from NRCS Montana on the topic of wildlife and wildlife habitat.

MontanaWildlife

### Wildlife Habitat Planting (Ac.) (420) Conservation Practice Standard

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Wildlife Habitat Planting (Ac.) (420).

Wildlife HabitatWildlife

### Windbreak/Shelterbelt Establishment and Renovation (Ft.) (380) Conservation Practice Standard

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Windbreak/Shelterbelt Establishment and Renovation (Ft.) (380).

ShrubsTrees

### Wisconsin Engineering Resources

Wisconsin Field Office Technical Guide (FOTG) Engineering Specifications and Conservation Practice Standards.

Wisconsin

### Woody Residue Treatment (Ac.) (384) Conservation Practice Standard

Download the national conservation practice standard document and supporting documents for Woody Residue Treatment (Ac.) (384).

PlantsForestry

-    First  
-    Previous  
-   ...  
-  9 
-  10 
-  11 
-  12 
-  13 
-  14 
-  15 
-  16 
-  17
#### Hansen, Administrator, Appellant, vs. Milwaukee Coke & Gas Company, Respondent.

*May 21*—

June *17, 1914.*

*Nonsuit: Affirmance on appeal: Power to grant new trial.*

Affirmance, on appeal, of a judgment of nonsuit does not affect the power of the trial court to entertain and decide an application for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence.

Pee Curiam.

A judgment of nonsuit in this case was affirmed by this court December 9, 1913 (see 155 Wis. 235, 144 N. W. 289). The record of the case being still in this court, the appellant, in May, 1914, moved for an amendment to the mandate which would give to the trial court power to entertain and decide an application for new trial of the case based upon affidavits purporting to show newly discovered evidence. Notwithstanding the mandate of affirmance, we do not understand that the affirmance affects in any way the power of the trial court in the matter. We express no opinion upon the sufficiency or timeliness of the motion for a new trial.

Motion denied without costs.
Exhibit 10.1


 


September 26, 2008


 


CONFIDENTIAL


 


Dear Tamara:


 


Favrille, Inc. (the “Company”) values
the contributions that you have made to date, and we feel that you are a vital
part of the team charged with exploring and/or executing strategic alternatives
for the Company.


 


The Company wishes to continue to retain your
services and to incentivize you to continue as an employee for as long as the
Company currently anticipates that it will need your services.  We recognize that such continued service is
likely to result in you delaying and/or foregoing other employment
opportunities.  Accordingly, if you
remain employed with the Company through November 1,
2008, the Company will pay you a retention bonus in the form of an
enhancement of your base salary by fifty percent (50%) from June 7, 2008
through November 1, 2008. (An
extension from October 1, 2008, per the previous letter agreement dated September 7,
2008)  The bonus will be advanced to you
on the Company’s standard payroll dates, beginning June 30, 2008.  In the event that you voluntarily leave the
employment of the Company prior to November 1,
2008, the bonus amounts previously advanced to you, since October 1,
2008, will be deducted from your final paycheck (provided that the amount so
deducted shall not cause your wage for the pay period in question to be reduced
below the minimum wage required by law), and by
your signature below you expressly authorize the Company to make such a
deduction from your final pay. 
In the event that the Company elects to terminate your employment (other
than for misconduct) prior to November 1,
2008  you will receive the full
retention bonus, calculated through November 1,
2008, in your final pay.  This
retention bonus is in addition to any other form or amount of compensation that
you are eligible to receive pursuant to any other arrangement with the Company.


 


This payment will be contingent upon the
following:


 


·                  Continued employment with the Company through
November 1, 2008;
and


·                  That you have not received any type of
disciplinary action or warning or committed any act of misconduct in connection
with your employment.


 


This agreement does not
change the nature of your employment or alter the other terms of your
employment agreement with the Company as set forth in the Employment Agreement
dated January 6, 2005, between you and the Company.  You will continue to be bound by the Company’s
policies.  This agreement constitutes the
full and complete expression of our arrangement with respect to the bonus
described herein and supersedes any prior oral commitments or
representations.  This agreement cannot
be modified except by a written instrument approved and signed by both you and
the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.


 


Sincerely,


 


	
  /s/ John P. Longenecker

  	
   

  



 


John P. Longenecker, Ph.D.


President and Chief Executive Officer


 


 


Accepted:


 


	
  /s/ Tamara A. Seymour

  	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
  10-1-2008

  
	
  Tamara Seymour
cea et tates oaaithe AN aes es air ie cst

i
}
i

EXCEPT PRIOR TO CATEGORY B ENCRYPTION — = PHYSICALLY REMOVE
PRIOR 10 DECLASSIFICATION.

STAZF COMMUNICATIONS mt

EERE

TEL] os

{

ror

COMDR AFBMD ARDC. INGLEWOOD CALIF

advertising for construction contract award for the Fort Stevens,
Oregon, Tracking Data Acquisition Station, Positive approval
action by ARPA must be obtained before any further action is

taken in regard facilities not already authorized,

INFO: USAF INSTLS REPRE NO PAC RGN 301 CUSTOM HOUSE wor 10-104

PORTLAND ORE : j is CAF re
US ARMY ENGR DIST SEATTLE 4735E MARGINAL WAY SFT
. SEATTLE WASH DEF 950083
-«, COMDR ARDC ANDREWS AFB Mo WOR 1647-3
US ARMY ENGR DIST LOSA 751 S FIGUEROA LOSA is CAF IN:
61987
Fs cone oOEF 183950401 FROM OSD ARPA SGD JOHNSON . .
oe Regri
No repeat no authorization exists for Proceeding with eeraing oat

predetermined

M%
Pilg
aici

fevmnce

exe

ad one

OSD-ARPA Prog. Control & Admin, r

ie WW. Botton, Fr oBrog. Man Mgmt. Officer Roy yf, oer _m (4) :

on
Hone fe [ace 1 recto! ‘
WY feccunnry cx) iON
H he fa
| i Lfuieey :
IDD."e, 173° AEPLACES OO FORM 173, 1 OCT 49, WHIGH WILL BE USEO UNTH. EXHAUSTED z=

ORIGIN: OSD’ ‘

DIST: AF . é :
DEF 950401 (ocT 58) a jod/s

 CONFIBERFIAL yore
{ GF | -—PROW|aITED _

<b
#### *Nowland*v. *Brown,*

from Mecklenburg

Remanded for finding of further facts.