alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.45
 2008 Management Incentive Plan
 
 2008 Management Incentive Plan
MIP will be initially calculated based on the following components and payout tier structure.
Budget
Total RevenuePerformance Results 418.0 454.9 473.4 482.6 487.2 491.8494.3 496.7 499.2 501.6 504.1
2007 Actual = 504.7% to Actual (Actual/Budget) < 85%85% 92.5% 96.25% 98.13%
99.06% 100%100.5% 101% 101.5% 102% 102.5% CAP30% 2008 Plan = 491.8Payout Factor 0%
50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%110% 120% 130% 140% 150%
Budget
Net Income After TaxPerformance Results 99.2 107.9 112.3 114.5 115.6 116.7117.0 117.3 117.6 117.9 118.2
2007 Actual = 100.8% to Actual (Actual/Budget) < 85%85% 92.5% 96.25% 98.13%
99.06% 100%100.25% 100.5% 100.75% 101% 101.25% CAP25% 2008 Plan = 116.7Payout Factor
0%50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%110% 120% 130% 140% 150%
Budget
DepositsPerformance Results 7,888.8 7,979.8 8,025.3 8,048.1 8,059.4 8,070.8 8,080.9 8091.18,495.6 8,900.2 9,304.7 9,709.3 10,113.8
2007 Actual = 8,301.925% to Actual (Actual/Budget) < 97.5%97.5% 98.63% 99.19%
99.47% 99.61% 99.75% 99.88% 100%105% 110% 115% 120% 125% CAP20% 2008 Plan = 8,091.055Payout
Factor 0%50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 120%126% 132% 138% 144% 150%
Budget
Non Performing AssetsPerformance Results 330.7 315.6 308.1 304.4 302.5 300.6294.6 288.6 282.6 276.6 270.5
2007 Actual = 251.540% to Actual (Actual/Budget) < 90%90% 95% 97.5% 98.75%
99.38% 100%102% 104% 106% 108% 110% CAP15% 2008 Plan = 300.6Payout Factor 0%50% 60%
70% 80% 90% 100%110% 120% 130% 140% 150%
Budget
Expense MgmtPerformance Results 318.9 315.7 314.2 313.4 313.0 312.6311.0 309.5 307.9 306.3 304.8
2007 Actual = 327.423% to Actual (Actual/Budget) < 98%98% 99% 99.5% 99.75%
99.88% 100%100.5% 101% 101.5% 102% 102.5% CAP10% 2008 Plan = 312.6Payout Factor 0%
50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%110% 120% 130% 140% 150%
00%Payout % is incremental between tiers (ex. Each % over budget earns x% additional incentive)
1Discretion may be used by the compensation committee to over-ride the formula under appropriate circumstances 2Any adjustments for unusual items (such as acquisitions, divestitures) w ill require
compensation committee approval Discretionary Modifier  Guidelines Only 3The above
numbers w ill not include the impact of extra-ordinary items An additional peer group ranking modifier may be used to determine final payouts of MIP
4The above numbers w ill be adjusted to neutralize the impact of equity compensation Component Weighting 5The above numbers w ill be adjusted to normalize
the impact of equity adjustments due to interest rate movements Revenue 50%
Peer Group: 6The discretion of management and the compensation committee is
the final factor in the determination of EXHIBIT
Net Income 50% Chemical Bank            eligibility and for final determination of payment aw ard.
Independent Bank
Peer Ranking            FactorMBT
Above 75th Percentile 125%Old National Below 25th Percentile 50%First Merit Mercentile Bank
Macatawa Bank            Capital Bancorp
2008 vs 2007 performanceCitizens First 10.45 62
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00351

- CR

Robert C. Morris

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From County Court at Law No. 1

o f Parker Count y (CCL 96

- 1806 )

December 18, 2014

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal i s dismissed for

want of jurisdiction

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Luther Jay Stowe, Appellant

No. 06

- 13

- 00203

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 6th District Court of Red River County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR

00479 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Carter and

Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of thi s date, we find that the motion of the appellant to

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Luther Jay Stowe, has adequately indicated his inability to

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED FEBRUARY 20, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
5 November 1957

SUBJECT: Analysis of Complex 65-1 at Cooke AFB

Request that you develop a complete analysis of Complex 65-1

at Cooke AFB for launchings of WS 117L missiles. This analysis

should be complete with regard to costs, numbers of stands to be

modified, instrumentation required, time schedule of launchings, and .

capability of SM 65's vs satellite vehicles.

It is important that this be accomplished as soon as possible so

that final cost estimates and course of action can be pursued. Please

advise as soon as possible.

1 1nel

2.:c-no for Record,

29 Oct 57 (WDI-57-78)

•

O. J. RITLAND

Brigadier General, USAF

Vice Commander

DOWNSRADED 

AT 3 YEAR INTERVALS

DECLASSIFIED 

D 

A

IR

FICR

52001.10

2 YEARS.

DOD 

CONFIDENIIL

WDGV • vb

Gen Rit1and 2221
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1313 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1313

To expand eligibility for reimbursement for smoking cessation services 
to include copayments for such services paid after fiscal year 2009 by 
 covered beneficiaries under the TRICARE program who are eligible for 
                               Medicare.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 2015

 Mr. Brown (for himself, Mr. Blumenthal, Mrs. Murray, and Mr. Durbin) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To expand eligibility for reimbursement for smoking cessation services 
to include copayments for such services paid after fiscal year 2009 by 
 covered beneficiaries under the TRICARE program who are eligible for 
                               Medicare.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Strong Lungs, Strong Lives Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF REIMBURSEMENT FOR SMOKING CESSATION SERVICES FOR 
              CERTAIN TRICARE BENEFICIARIES.

    Section 713(f) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110-417; 122 Stat. 4503) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ``during fiscal year 
        2009'';
            (2) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ``during such 
        period''; and
            (3) in paragraph (2), by striking ``during fiscal year 
        2009'' and inserting ``after September 30, 2008''.
                                 <all>
```
irkt,,w' Anoka a

THIN .

MONTH
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 29 (Thursday, February 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7907-7908]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02877]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Thirty-First Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport 
Security Access Control Systems

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

[[Page 7908]]


ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport Security 
Access Control Systems.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
thirty-first meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport 
Security Access Control Systems.

DATES: The meeting will be held on March 5th 2015 from 9:00 a.m.-4:00 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 224. The agenda will 
include the following:

March 5th 2015

    <bullet> Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks.
    <bullet> Review/Approve Previous Meeting Summary.
    <bullet> Report from the TSA.
    <bullet> Report on Safe Skies on Document Distribution.
    <bullet> Program Management Committee/TOR report.
    <bullet> Individual Document Section Reports.
    <bullet> Action Items for Next Meeting.
    <bullet> Time and Place of Next Meeting.
    <bullet> Any Other Business.
    <bullet> Adjourn.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 5, 2015.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Program Oversight and Administration, 
Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-02877 Filed 2-11-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
§ 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Point.360 (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for
      the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the “Report”), I, Alan R. Steel, Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
                15 (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.







/s/
      Alan
      R. Steel





Alan
      R.
      Steel


Chief
      Financial Officer


February
      28, 2007
Exhibit 99.1


                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer

     Pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  created  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, the  undersigned  officer of the general partner of
Tanger  Properties  Limited  Partnership  (the "Operating  Partnership")  hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

(i)  the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Operating Partnership
     for the  quarterly  period ended  September 30, 2002 (the  "Report")  fully
     complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or Section  15(d),  as
     applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the
     Operating Partnership.



Dated: November 14, 2002      /s/ Stanley K. Tanger
                              -------------------------------------------------
                              Stanley K. Tanger
                              Chief Executive Officer of Tanger GP Trust
                              Sole General Partner of the Operating Partnership
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Consortium Service
Management  Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005 (the "Report"),  I, Donald S. Robbins, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  April 3, 2006

                                                      /s/ Donald S. Robbins
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Donald S. Robbins
                                                     Chief Executive Officer


         The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350)  and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.











                                                                      Exhibit 32
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
C03107613 

NRO APPFgAgpeFOE,FicVEA,WkN 

1 AUGUSTS,(itqol System Only..., 

(C0,701) Zia-a 

C.A9-nOt cpt . vise 

COMOR-D-65/8 

29 February 1964' 

MEMORANDUM FOR: Committee on Overhead Reconnaissance 

SUBJECT; Satellite Coverage of TALL KING 

1. At the last meeting Major Shepherd advised of the SIGINT 

Working Group's establishment of an urgent objective to maintain a 

quarterly update of TAIrL LING radar deployment on the interior 

/ON 5±-, e ("14 4-* c6' 

of the Sino-Soviet bloc! The SWG likewise advises that the date of the 

latest information on the location of TALL ICING in the interior of the 

USSR is June 1963. SWG feels that in the event this objective cannot be 

-1,411t 

satisfied proriaptly by t.12.s- 1-;txt. now operational a special ROB package 

should be launched within the next 60 to 90 days with repeated coverage 

of this objective quarterly, 

2. It is suggested that the NRO discuss this matter at the 

meeting on 5 March and that COMOR then consider whether it wishes to 

endorse the SWG request in the light of NRO's briefing. 

WeIC 

Commi 

ames Q. Reber 

Chairman 

on Overhead Reconnaissance 

Copies 2, 3 State TCO 

4 DIA (Col, Ainsworth) 

5,6,7,8 DIA TCO 

9 OACSI TCO 

10,11 ONI TCO 

12,13,14,15 AFNIN TCO 

So" 16 ,17 NSA TCO 

18,19 NRO TCO BYE-3_313-64 

20 DIA(Maj. Shepherd) °1 of 52 

Handle via BYEMAN 

• 
C03107613 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 AUGHVapj5via BYEMAW 

Control System Only 

'NW 

24171t--F -

COMOR-D-65/8 

29 February 1964 

Copy DCI TCO for USIB/S 

21 TSO CIA 

22-31 Asst/OPS(NPIC) 

32 DDT TCO 

33,34 CGS 

35,36 CIA COMOR Member 

37 CGS/ReqBr/ReconGrp 

38 Ch/PRoto Wkg Grp 

39 AD/SI 

40 DDP TCO 

41 DDS&T TCO 

42 AD/EL 

43 AD/SA 

44 FA/OSA 

45 ID/OSA 

46 SS/OSA 

47 SAL/OSA 

48 RB/OSA 

49-52 SA(COMOR)DDS&T 

2 BYE-2313-64 

Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System Only
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           5,199
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,303
<ALLOWANCES>                                        50
<INVENTORY>                                       1240
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           6,181
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,079
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,006
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,006
<SALES>                                         32,168
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,168
<CGS>                                           21,764
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,734
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 648
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,022
<INCOME-TAX>                                       190
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,832
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,832
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1867

KRISTA E. GATT,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SN SERVICING CORPORATION; SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.; 

US BANK TRUST, N.A., as Trustee of the Chalet Series IV Trust; MCMICHAEL 

TAYLOR GRAY, LLC; LENOX TITLE TRUSTEE SERVICES, LLC,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00103-CMH-TCB)

Submitted: December 21, 2021 Decided: December 22, 2021

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Krista E. Gatt, Appellant Pro Se. Keith Michael Yacko, MCMICHAEL TAYLOR GRAY, 

LLC, Peachtree Corners, Georgia; John Alexander Nader, MCGLINCHEY STAFFORD, 

PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Krista E. Gatt appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint with 

prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gatt v. SN Servicing Corp., No. 1:21-cv00103-CMH-TCB (E.D. Va. June 22, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2005006EN.01004801.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/48

---

(2005/C 6/92)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the
  Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 314, 18.12.2004

OJ C 314, 18.12.2004

Past publications

OJ C 300, 4.12.2004

OJ C 273, 6.11.2004

OJ C 262, 23.10.2004

OJ C 251, 9.10.2004

OJ C 239, 25.9.2004

OJ C 228, 11.9.2004

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex:http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex

| | CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex |
| --- | --- |

CELEX:http://europa.eu.int/celex

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (No. 333-47851, 333-47843, 333-47059, and 333-46991) of Flexi International
Software, Inc. of our reported dated January 29, 2000, appearing in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Flexi International Software, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1999. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our
report on the Financial Statement Schedule of this Form 10-K.


Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
March 23, 2000
•

29 «day 1963

dire' .472?-41

DIRECTOR OF DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING

WASHINGTON 21, D.C.

IczwatarDum ma. RECORD

11.1catiac with Ds-. scovitto

•

is

1

a

.. •

COM

Ea a c.onvorcatioa with D. liorbert Scov

Ccovillo coramcated to t ofikict that it was C11.. 1 .1

aad uadcrotazdiza that th to the C7.6..tha rezponcibility for the davo.o. catellito) dilicrezt from tho Navy Aso cLicration st oao race.

DD.

hic srd thc

had aZ/Stned ;

"truly"

•

• Do!suty Z4rector

Caocoarah fk &formation Syzta=z)

Copy fcraiched:

Sec "'cf.

Dols Sec Def

1•1110

•

•

•

-.•• at:1F. tii

• ••••• • — ••"..14* be d

ce:za

,A4•,...• 4• 444

' • . • 7 - 7.7 No.

41;

1P.••••••
#### STATE v. NELSON PORTER.

*Indictment for burning a barn.*

An indictment under the statute for burning a barn must aver that the act was done “ with intent thereby to injure or defraud” some person. The. Code, $985, sub-div. 6. And an indictment for such offence at common law must charge that the barn contained hay or grain, or is parcel of the dwelling-house.

*720INDICTMENT for burning a barn tried at Spring Term, 1884, of Mecklenbueg Superior Court, before *MaoRae, J.*

This was an appeal from the inferior court of Mecklenburg; county, where the defendant was convicted.

The indictment: “The jurors for the state upon their oath present, that Nelson Porter and Dock Howard, of Mecklenburg, in the county of Mecklenburg, on the 1st day of November in the year 1883, with force and arms, a certain building, to-wit, a barn, the property of one H. K. Reid, there situate, feloniously, wilfully and maliciously did set fire to and bum, against the peace and dignity of the state and against the form of the statute in such case made and provided.”

In the inferior court the counsel for the defendant moved in arrest of judgment, but the court refused the motion and the defendant appealed. In the superior court the motion was renewed and ITis Honor being of opinion that the indictment was good at common law, affirmed the judgment of the inferior court, and the defendant appealed.

*Attorney-General,*for the State.

No counsel for the defendant.

Ashe, J.

The judgment pronounced by His Honor was erroneous. The judgment should have been arrested. The indictment cannot be sustained at common law or under the statute. Not under the statute, because it fails to charge that the act was done *with intent to injure or defraud some person.*The Code, §985, sub-div. 6. Nor can it be sustained at common law, because it was not an indictable offence at common law to burn a barn, unless the indictment contained the averment that it contained hay or grain, or was a parcel of the dwelling-house.

The following definition of the offence at common law is given by Sir Matthew Hale : “ The felony of arson or wilful burning of houses is described by Lord Coke to be the mali*721cious and voluntary burning the house of another by night or day. It extendeth not only to the very dwelling-house, but to all out-houses that are a part thereof, though not contiguous to it, or under the same roof, as in case of burglary, the barn, stable, cow-house, sheep-house, dairy-house, milk-house. But if the barn or out-house be not parcel of the dwelling-house, it is not felony unless the barn have hay or grain in it.” 1 Hale P. C., 566-7. All the writers of criminal law give substantially the same definition. See 2 Russell on Crimes, 1024; Wharton on Criminal Law, vol. 2, §1058. If the indictment had charged that the barn contained hay or grain, or that it was a parcel of the dwelling-house, the indictment would have been good at common law. The common law only threw its protection over such houses as were used for the habitation of man. The judgment must be arrested. Let this opinion be certified to the superior court of Mecklenburg county.

Error. Judgment arrested.