alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Sutton, Lisa

From: Stenger, Wren

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 4:36 PM

To: Sutton, Lisa; Wortman, Eric

Subject: FW: SSM SIP call signed today

Attachments: McCabe letter to air directors final SSM SIP call 05-22-15.pdf

For recird

Sent from my Windows Phone

From: Donaldson, Guy

Sent: 5/22/2015 11:11 AM

To: beverly.botchlet‐smith@deq.state.ok.us; cheryl.bradley@deq.state.ok.us; dbrymer@tceq.state.tx.us;

davisa@adeq.state.ar.us; eddie.terrill@deq.state.ok.us; Fmacias@cabq.gov; Itavarez@cabq.gov; Nieto, Margaret E.;

rheaume@adeq.state.ar.us; richard.goodyear@state.nm.us; rita.bates@state.nm.us; Tegan Treadaway; Vivian Aucoin;

Steve Hagle; Stephanie Bergeron Perdue; scott.thompson@deq.ok.gov; tyler.powell@doe.ok.gov; peggy.hatch@la.gov;

vince.sagnibene@la.gov; Ryan Flynn; Spencer, Stuart; Keogh, Becky

Cc: Shar, Alan; Bartley, Richard; Janis Hudson; Stenger, Wren; Hansen, Mark; Luthans, William; Robinson, Jeffrey

Subject: SSM SIP call signed today

This message is a follow‐up Wren Stenger’s recent phone call or E‐mails notifying you about the final action the EPA

Administrator signed today to ensure states have in place air pollution rules that apply to sources at all times, including

when the source is operating during periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction (SSM).  

  

This action responds to a Petition for Rulemaking filed by the Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians concerning the

treatment of excess emissions at industrial facilities during SSM operations, specifically how those emissions are treated

in state implementation plan (SIP) provisions that the EPA previously approved. Also, as part of this action, EPA has

revised and clarified its policy concerning SSM provisions consistent with the Clean Air Act.

The EPA is calling for 36 states, including your state, to make changes to their SIPs, to protect public health and ensure

consistency with the Clean Air Act and the EPA’s current SSM Policy.  Your state will have 18 months to submit revisions

of your state plan to EPA. Your state’s revised SIP is due to EPA by November 22, 2016.  

  

As part of our notification to your state about this final SIP call, I have attached to this email a letter from the EPA’s

Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation, Janet McCabe. To inform you of the details on the final action,

including the specific SIP provisions your state needs to address, we have posted a pre‐publication version of the action

on our website at:  http://www.epa.gov/airquality/urbanair/sipstatus/emissions.html.  

  

The EPA will continue to work closely with you to ensure the SIP revision process is as efficient as possible.  If you or your

staff have questions, please contact myself at 214‐665‐7242 or Alan Shar with technical questions at 214‐665‐6691 or

Richard Bartley 214‐665‐8046 with legal questions.  

  

Attachment
|EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Optimal Robotics Corp. (the Company), does hereby certify that to the best of the undersigneds knowledge:
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            

| | 1) | the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                      

|                      |                  |                                                
|--------------------- | ---------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 14, 2005 |                  | /s/ Neil S. Wechsler                           
|                      | Neil S. Wechsler
|                      |                  | Co-Chairman and         Chief Executive Officer
|                      |                  |                                                

|
|
Exhibit 23.1

Accountants' Consent

Board
of Directors
Gold Banc Corporation, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-74594, 333-80751, 333-78871 and 333-34152) on
Form S-8 of Gold Banc Corporation, Inc. of our report dated April 15, 2003 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Gold Banc Corporation, Inc. as of
December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period then ended, which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2002 of Gold Banc Corporation, Inc.
Our report refers to a change in the method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets in 2002.

Our
report dated April 15, 2003 contains an explanatory paragraph that refers to a restatement of the consolidated financial statements for 2001 and 2000.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Kansas
City, Missouri
April 15, 2003

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED 6/30/99 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,420
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,956
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,854
<INVENTORY>                                     33,075
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,174
<PP&E>                                          50,199
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,921
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 181,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,990
<BONDS>                                        123,413
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           39,151
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                    (18,501)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   181,754
<SALES>                                        206,076
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               206,076
<CGS>                                          117,793
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  117,793
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                73,487
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   457
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,464
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,125)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (727)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,398)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,018)
<CHANGES>                                      (1,718)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,134)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.62)


</TABLE>
NRCC4411;R FOR 

'•••■■ LA'a.s. a

b';;StZ1111 

. ,•••. 

N 

/22 155 6Z 

BT 

XXXXX 

CHARGE 542 

/ 

•C> ‘Q / 

/N/N/ 

/N/N1 

DISTRIBUTION 

SAF-SL A ] 

V. D' 

• 

'N /N 

• • 

• 

11 6 ELA 

SLM 

SLP 

SLS 

SLT 

?'01 N /

-1581=-8-144-1_221556Z CITE 

CHARGE 

FOR COLONEL SMITH/COL HERAN FROM /RANDALL 

REFERENCE YOUR CHARGE 6205 CONCERNING DORIAN AEROSPACE. THE MESSAGE . 

IS ANOTHER ILLUSTRATION OF PROCEEDING ON A CERTAIN BASIS FOR AN 

EXTENDED PERIOD NOT CONSISTENT WITH PROGRAM LIMITATIONS, WITHOUT - 

SUFFICIENT ALERTING TO THIS HEADQUARTERS, AND THEN SUBMITTING A 

MESSAGE WHICH PROVIDES CHOICES OF COVERING UNAPPROVED DEFICIENCIES 

07 SUFFERING DRASTIC IMPACTSON 7HE PROGRAM. THIS IS NOT MERELY A 

CASE THAT THE AEROSPACE DOLLAR CEILINGS WOULD NOT BE EXCEEDED BY 

THE ACTIONS; MORE IMPORTANTLY, IT PRESENTS ANOTHER INCREASED FUNDING 

PROBLEM FOR DORIAN, WHICH IS ALREADY IN SERIOUS FINANCIAL CONDITION. 

FURTHER, INCREASED FY 1967 ACTIVITY INHERENTLY CREATES AN ADDED FY 

1968 FUND PROBLEM BECAUSE OF THE INCREASED MIS LEVEL AT THE START OF 

FY 1968. THE MONTHLY FINANCIAL STATUS REPORTS THRU FEB 1967 HAVE NOT 

INDICATED THE THE $1,750K APPROVAL WOULD BE.INADEQUATE„ YET IT IS 

APPARENT THAT YOU WERE'PROCEEDING AT A RATE IN THE FIRST HALF OF . 

THE FISCAL YEAR WHICH SIGNIFICANTLY EXCEEDED THE APPROVED RATE. 

DORIAN FUNDING APPROVALS ARE TO BE CONSIDERED AS LIMITING UNTIL ACCEPTABLE 

AND TIMELY REASONS ARE PROVIDED FOR A CHANGE. IF IT IS CONSIDERED THAT 

ANY APPROVAL IS INADEQUATE, THEN THE PROPER COURSE OF ACTION IS TO 

REQUEST AN INCREASE WITH REASONS AS SOON AS THE SITUATION DEVELOPS,. • 

AND NOT TO TAKE ACTIONS WHICH AUTOMATICALLY CREATE DEFICIENCIES. • 

OUT THIS UNDERSTANDING, ADEQUATE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT CAN NOT BE 

MAINTAINED. 

FURTHER ACTION ON YOUR REQUEST IS DEPENDENT ON A BETTER UNDERSTANDING 

OF MOL AEROSPACE MIS AND COSTS, BOTH DORIAN AND WHITE, FOR FY 1967 • AND 1968. REQUIREMENTS ARE TO CONSIDERED THE REVISED'BASELINE PROGRAM 

SHCEDULE. REQUEST THIS AEROSPACE SUBJECT BE INCLUDED ON THE AGENDA 

FOR THE MOL MANAGEMENT MEETING ON APRIL 6 FOR REVIEW AND DECISION BY 

DR. FLAX AND GEN FERGUSON, 

rl v 1- r 

C C./ Lil•fh;ti
smilimpum )fri NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFHt,t

WASHINGTON. D.C.

T NRO STAFF 3 August 1971

ii XEMORANDUM FOR RECORD

i

SUBJECT: Briefing of Dr. Edward Teller, 2 August 1971

A briefing was held in Room 297, Old Executive Office

Building, from 0900 to 1145.

Attendees 

Dr: Teller

Dr. McLucas

Dr. Naka

Mr. Jerry Burke, ExSecy to PFIAB

Col Bradburn

Dr. Teller took an active part in the discussion. He said

at the outset that he preferred not to see any charts; however,

by the end of the briefing he had looked at one or two charts

on organization and all of the pictorial system charts. Dr.

Teller expressed the following views:

The U-2 program should be continued and, if anything, emphasized. We should consider arming the U-28 with

laser weapons for use against laser-equipped interceptors

which Dr. Teller believes will appear within two years.

We should use color film with existing systems

and emphasize the need for color imagery in planned systems.

We should be developina an all-weather day-andnight photographic system using pulsed lasers.

We should give serious consideration to =ultiple

decoy satellites which would convince the Russians that they

are under :::.nstant observation.

e. We should consider the use of nuclear power

supplies for our long life vehicles, instead of solar arrays.

TOP SECNT

caCa.0110 1000 aatoweec ac00aMws

000 SACCO. *IN I0 0011. •41

areasoL

Internal

:: 1

.•

•••:. •

• 1"fn
Colonel, USAF

ii

et

ii

rt',f

;:4;;

?:••

81.

•

f. Some kind of cooperation with NATO would be desirable, in Dr. Teller's opinion. He is going to talk this over

with Gen Goodpaster in the near future. Dr. Teller believes

that some sharing of costs and results with NATO should be

worked out.

ACTION ITEMS 

epare summary of NRP work on lasers.

repare brief discussion of the rationale for

nuclear pplies vs solar arrays for long life vehicles.

TOP SrCrrT

COSMO& Ihe

COP, Ot OVUM

cacumbi• ••••• .00.1.14 AIRJ14•4•0

NO S.Iita.rr • . 1 r avoir

• • !AP,"

••• • .' . •

." • • .
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03170]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research (#1203), 
Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC), Cornell 
University Site Visit.
    Dates & Times:

May 20, 2015; 7:15 p.m.-9:00 p.m.
May 21, 2015; 7:15 a.m.-8:30 p.m.
May 22, 2015; 7:15 a.m.-4:00 p.m.

    Place: Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850.
    Type of Meeting: Part open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Daniele Finotello, Program Director, 
Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers Program, Division 
of Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-4676.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning further support of the MRSEC at Cornell University.
    Agenda

Wednesday, May 20, 2015

7:15 p.m.-9:00 p.m. Closed--Briefing of panel

Thursday, May 21, 2015

7:15 a.m.-4:30 p.m. Open--Review of the MRSEC
5:00 p.m.-6:45 p.m. Closed--Executive Session
6:45 p.m.-8:30 p.m. Open--Dinner

Friday, May 22, 2015

7:15 a.m.-9:50 a.m. Closed--Executive Session
9:50 a.m.-4:00 p.m. Closed--Executive Session, Draft and Review 
Report

    Reason for Closing: The work being reviewed during this site 
visit may include information of a proprietary or confidential 
nature, including technical information; financial data, such as 
salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the MRSEC. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) 
and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 11, 2015.
Suzanne Plimpton,
Acting Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-03170 Filed 2-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,434,806
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  776,785
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,179
<INVENTORY>                                    665,928
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,015,765
<PP&E>                                       2,067,705
<DEPRECIATION>                               (910,517)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,280,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          657,753
<BONDS>                                        418,094
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,381
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,088,060
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,280,288
<SALES>                                      1,154,429
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,154,429
<CGS>                                          381,309
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  381,309
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               543,115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,912
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                263,481
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            263,481
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   263,481
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26


</TABLE>
es Q. Reber 

Chairman 

Corn n Overhead Reconnaissance 

003107613 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 AUGUW-Me via BYEMAN 

Control System Only 

SA (COMDR) DDS&T 

COMOR-D-65/ 10 

16 April 1964 

MEMORANDUM FOR: Committee on Overhead Reconnaissance 

SUBJECT: Satellite ROB Coverage of TALL KING Radars 

At the COMOR meeting of 16 April, the COMOR after 

consideration of the DIA report on SAC's needs (see COMOR-D-65/9) 

agreed to submit the attached requirement to the NRO. By publication 

of this document for the information and reference of COMOR, it is 

also officially transmitted to the NRO for its attention. 

Attachment 

Subject paper 

Copies 2, 3 

4 

5 

6, 7, 8, 9 

10 

11, 12 

13, 14, 15, 16 

17, 18 

19,20 

State TCO 

DIA (Col. Ainsworth) 

DIA (Maj. Shepherd) 

DIA TCO 

OACSI TCO 

ONI TCO 

AFNIN TCO 

NSA TCO 

NRO TCO 

BYE-2642-64 

Copy 51. of 52 

No , 

Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System Only 

--refk-sgazu___ • 
003107613 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 AUGUST 2015 

Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System Only 

-717P-SEC-441-. 

COMOR-D-65/ 10 

16 April 1964 

MEMORANDUM FOR: National Reconnaissance Office 

ATTENTION: Director, NRO Staff 

SUBJECT: Satellite ROB Coverage of TALL KING Radars 

KING 

1. A priority need exists for a quarterly update of the TALL 

rada.r. deployment. 

2. Collection tolerances relative to this objective: 

a. Location (An accuracy of within 25 nrn 

radius is acceptable, 10 nrn radius is desired.) 

b. RF 5%) 

c. Modulation Characteristics 

(1) PRF 10%) 

(2) PW (+ 20%) 

d. Scan Rate (Cir) (+ 10%) 

ames Q. Reber 

Chairman 

Committee on Overhead Reconnaissance 

2. BYE-2642-64 

Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System Only 
C03107613 

NRO APPROVED FOR RELEASE 

1 AUGUST 2015 

Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System Only 

70P-SfeRE6T-- 

COMOR-D-6 /10 

Now' 

Copy 1 DCI TCO for USIB/S 

TSO CIA 

Asst/OPS(NPIC) 

DDI TCO 

CGS 

CIA COMOR Member 

CGS RegBr/ReconGria 

Ch/COMOR Wkg Grp 

AD/SI 

DDP TCO 

DDS&T TCO 

AD/EL 

AD/SA 

FA/OSA 

ID/OSA 

SS/OSA 

SAL/OSA 

RB/OSA 

SA(COMOR)DDS&T 

3 BYE-2642-64 

`4111111.1 

Handle via BYEMAN 

Control System Only 

21 

22 

231-31 

32 

33,34 

35,36 

37 

38 

39 

40 

41 

42 

43 

44 

45 

46 

47 

48 

49-52
1 The HONORABLE ORTRIE D. SMITH, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 09-1684

___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Western District of Missouri. * Dale G. Lucas, Jr., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Defendant - Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: January 11, 2010 Filed: January 25, 2010

___________ Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, JOHN R. GIBSON and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In 2006, Dale G. Lucas, Jr., pl eaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute crack cocaine. The district court determin ed an advisory guidelines sentencing range of 130-162 months and sentenced Lucas to 130 months in prison. After the Sentencing Commission reduced by two levels the offe nse level applicable to crack cocaine offenses in Amendments 706, 711, and 713 to the Guidelines, Lucas moved for modification of his sentence under 18 U.S .C. § 3582(c)(2). The district court 1 granted a two-level reduction, reduc ing the advisory range to 110-137 months, and re-2We note that nearly every other circuit agrees with our decision in Starks . See, e.g. , United States v. Dillon , 572 F.3d 146, 148-50 (3d Cir.), cert. granted , --- S. Ct. ----, 2009 WL 2899562 (Dec. 7, 2009). -2- sentenced Lucas to 110 months in pris on. The court noted: “The maximum adjustment permitted is 2 levels, so the C ourt cannot grant the Defendant’s request for a greater reduction.” Lucas appeals, arguing that the districtcourt erred when it considered the Guidelines mandatory in applying § 3582(c )(2) and the policy statements in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10. This argument is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Starks , 551 F.3d 839, 842 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 129 S. Ct. 2746 (2009), that “neither the Sixth Amendment nor [United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005),] prevents Congress from incorporating a guideline provision as a means of defining and limiting a district court’s authority to reduce a sentence under § 3582(c).” The district court correctly applied 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) and U.S.S.G. § 1B 1.10(b)(2)(A) as construed in Starks , which is binding on our panel. We reject Lucas’s contention that Spears v. United States , 129 S. Ct. 840 (2009) -- a decision that did not mention § 3582(c)(2) -- permits us to revisit the decision of another panel in Starks

. 2Accordingly, we must affirm.

______________________________
EXHIBIT 10.50
                                                                   -------------



HEARTSOFT LOGO



January 18, 2001


Mr. Greg Dhuyvetter
LaMode Quality Cleaners
7025 East 41st Street
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74145

Dear Greg:

This brief letter will outline our agreement whereby you shall provide a
short-term loan in the amount of $60,000 for no more than seven days. In fact,
we expect that the loan shall be repaid late in the day on Monday or Tuesday,
January 22-23, 2001.

Under the terms of the loan, you shall receive ________ upon repayment as well
as ________ shares of Heartsoft, Inc. common stock.

The shares of common stock shall be restricted, but Heartsoft, Inc. shall agree
to include the shares in a SB-2 Registration Statement which is expected to be
filed on or around January 31, 2001. Upon approval of the registration statement
by the SEC which is expected to take approximately 90 days, the restrictive
legend on your _______ shares shall be lifted and the shares shall be eligible
for sale at such time.

Upon funding of the short-term loan, this agreement shall become the complete
and binding agreement of Heartsoft, Inc.

Warmest and most sincere regards,

/s/ Benjamin P. Shell

Benjamin P. Shell
CEO, Heartsoft, Inc.