alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Motion Granted; Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 10, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-21-00286-CR

RYAN RYDELL BONNER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 122nd District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 19-CR-1881

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant appeals his conviction for retaliation. Appellant’s appointed 

counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and 

without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 

738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and 

demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. 

State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
2

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised 

of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford 

v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). On December 1, 2021, 

appellant filed a pro se response to counsel’s brief.

We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and appellant’s pro 

se response and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we 

find no reversible error in the record. We are not to address the merits of each 

claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined 

there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 

827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Poissant and Wilson.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
    
                    
                       
<MULTIPLIER>                                            1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         37,821,201
<SECURITIES>                                   70,008,486
<RECEIVABLES>                                     535,621
<ALLOWANCES>                                       23,000
<INVENTORY>                                     1,126,891
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              110,350,663
<PP&E>                                          3,741,182
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,834,757 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                114,644,537
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           5,951,019
<BONDS>                                           706,553
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0                                    
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          323,495
<OTHER-SE>                                      5,772,740
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  114,644,537
<SALES>                                           987,793
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                6,805,889
<CGS>                                             939,975
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     939,975
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 94,383
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 3,883,408
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,322,942
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             2,560,466
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,560,466
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .84

        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6768-6769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02474]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--OpenDaylight Project, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 24, 2014 pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), OpenDaylight Project, Inc. 
(``OpenDaylight'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Intracom S.A. Telecom Solutions, Athens, Greece; Compass 
Electro Optical System, Netanya, Israel; and Megaport, Queensland, 
Australia, have been added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and OpenDaylight intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

[[Page 6769]]

    On May 23, 2013, OpenDaylight filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on July 1, 2013 (78 FR 39326).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 1, 
2014. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on November 4, 2014 (79 FR 65425).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2015-02474 Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1265 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1265

 To require the Secretary of Defense to make certain certifications to 
      Congress before retiring B-1, B-2, or B-52 bomber aircraft.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 11, 2015

  Mr. Rounds (for himself, Mr. Hoeven, Ms. Heitkamp, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. 
 Cruz, and Mr. Cassidy) introduced the following bill; which was read 
         twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of Defense to make certain certifications to 
      Congress before retiring B-1, B-2, or B-52 bomber aircraft.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Long Range Bomber Sustainment Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATIONS ON RETIREMENT OF B-1, B-2, AND B-52 BOMBER 
              AIRCRAFT.

    No B-1, B-2, or B-52 bomber aircraft may be retired during a fiscal 
year unless the Secretary of Defense certifies, by not later than March 
1 of the preceding fiscal year, that--
            (1) the retirement of the aircraft will not detrimentally 
        affect the capacity of the Armed Forces of the United States to 
        carry out the full range of long range bomber aircraft missions 
        anticipated in operational plans of the Armed Forces in effect 
        as of the date of the submission of that certification;
            (2) the Secretary has completed assessments of--
                    (A) planning scenarios that span the range of 
                plausible future challenges for such aircraft; and
                    (B) the severity, likelihood, and imminence of risk 
                associated with each such planning scenario;
            (3) the Secretary has concluded, based on the assessments 
        referred to in paragraph (2), that retirements of B-1, B-2, and 
        B-52 bomber aircraft in the near term will not detrimentally 
        affect operational capability; and
            (4) the Secretary has developed a plan to replace any 
        operational capability lost as a result of the retirement of 
        such bomber aircraft.
                                 <all>
```
Major General David. wade”

Commander

let Missile Division “
‘andenberg Air Force Base, Califomia

mS

Dear Dever’ a ae

< The Space Technology Labosstorias, Ince, bas completed a
study of the use of 651 laumchers for I17L launches, The results,
of the study, undertaken at my request, are attached for your ine “*:

formation and Iwould appreciate your views and comments ‘on them,

Che STs analysts, which has bean veritid eed engineers
concludes’ ‘thats

: a “The technical feastattey of
for: ‘117L use ata nominal cost is established,

be, Range ‘aatety for southerly’ 1i
“onl ia not & serious problem,.

.. Southerly Jaunches permit the fall range of: secennaiseanc:
coverage desired. ee :

: "ar" dectelon ons your pric the’
wat pra he senses

‘ Stand avavession : scope ad time’ would
degrade the ICBMeIOC, | Py %

ke Atlas missile conversion and. MOD
present RO great problems,
Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111884 

TOP SECRET 

~NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

HANDLE VIA r 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

I llllli 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 14 00079167D 

THE NRO STA FF 2 2 MAY 1969 

HANDLE VIA 

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. McLUCAS 

SUBJECT: NRO Paper on Satellite Reconnaissance for Use at the 

Space Task Group (STG) Level 

In my memorandum of March 29, I discussed the Vice Presidential 

level review of U.S. space objectives, the Space Task Group, the DOD 

space planning action under Dr. Seamans' direction, and a suggested 

approach to our providing a useful contribution on satellite reconnaissance for use at the STG level {Tab A). 

Early last month you discussed this subject with Dr. Seamans and 

obtained his agreement to your approach to preparing an NRO paper. 

On April 24 you were provided a copy of a draft memorandum (Tab B) 

intended for Mr. Agnew's signature to the NRP Executive Committee 

which outlined the STG plans for including information on the NRP in 

its review. Specifically, it requested a TOP SECRET BYE MAN annex, 

which would list prospective missions, payload weights, cost estimates, 

and an indication of the future launching frequency of NRP satellites. 

We have completed the NRO input to the STG and are now submitting 

it for your review. Following your approval, we anticipate that you will 

send it to the ExCom and, subsequently, to Dr. Seamans for incorporation into the STG report. Until the present, it has been read only by a 

few Staff members and myself. If you desire additional review by other 

persons, please advise me. 

Brigadier General, USAF 

Dor-u:: w IT-t\ Lew I\ I..LE'N - kc Luc,ai,,s;. (i9 NA-v) 

1. SEN o To E,c,ro~ 

2 · Ml\"116 M.« .CE y 1c.E..Jtf!T..u 

CONTROL NO 

BYEMAN TOHECREI_ ------- COPY ___ o, ___ COPIES 

CONTROL SYSTEM EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

DOD DIRECTIVE 5200.10 DOES NOT APPLY 

Approved for Release: 2020/02/07 C05111884 

PAGE ___ OF ___ PAGES
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THOE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company
on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned officers of Impax Laboratories, Inc. does hereby certify that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of the Section 13(a)
         or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



<S>                                                       <C>                            <C>
          /s/ Barry R. Edwards                 Chief Executive Officer           Date: November 16, 2004
----------------------------------------
            Barry R. Edwards



          /s/ Cornel C. Spiegler               Chief Financial Officer           Date: November 16, 2004
----------------------------------------
            Cornel C. Spiegler

</TABLE>


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
U.S. Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 33 (Thursday, February 19, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03443]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Commission Staff Attendance

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) hereby gives 
notice that members of the Commission's staff may attend the following 
meeting related to the transmission planning activities of Public 
Service Company of Colorado, Tucson Electric Power Company, UNS 
Electric, Inc., Public Service Company of New Mexico, Arizona Public 
Service Company, El Paso Electric Company, Black Hills Power, Inc., 
Black Hills Colorado Electric Utility Company, LP, Cheyenne Light, 
Fuel, & Power Company, Nevada Power Company, and Sierra Pacific Power 
Company:

WestConnect Regional Planning Process Stakeholder Meeting

February 19, 2015, 12:30 p.m.-4:00 p.m. (PST)

    The above-referenced meeting will be held at: NV Energy, 7155 
Lindell Road, Las Vegas, NV 89118.

    The above-referenced meeting will be via web conference and 
teleconference.
    The above-referenced meeting is open to stakeholders.
    Further information may be found at http://www.westconnect.com/filestorage/02-19-15_WestConnect_Stakeholder_Meeting_Agenda.pdf.
The discussions at the meeting described above may address matters at 
issue in the following proceedings:

Docket No. ER13-75, Public Service Company of Colorado
Docket No. ER13-1469
Docket No. ER15-416

Docket No. ER13-77, Tucson Electric Power Company
Docket No. ER13-1461
Docket No. ER15-433

Docket No. ER13-78, UNS Electric, Inc.
Docket No. ER13-1462
Docket No. ER15-434

Docket No. ER13-79, Public Service Company of New Mexico
Docket No. ER13-1447
Docket No. ER15-413

Docket No. ER13-82, Arizona Public Service Company
Docket No. ER13-1450
Docket No. ER15-411

Docket No. ER13-91, El Paso Electric Company
Docket No. ER13-1465
Docket No. ER15-426

Docket No. ER13-96, Black Hills Power, Inc.
Docket No. ER13-1472
Docket No. ER15-431

Docket No. ER13-97, Black Hills Colorado Electric Utility Company, LP
Docket No. ER13-1474
Docket No. ER15-430

Docket No. ER13-120, Cheyenne Light, Fuel, & Power Company
Docket No. ER13-1471
Docket No. ER15-432

Docket No. ER15-428, Nevada Power Company and Sierra Pacific Power 
Company
Docket No. ER13-1466
Docket No. ER15-423
Docket No. ER15-424

    For more information, contact Gabe Aguilera, Office of Energy 
Market Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at (202) 502-
8489 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b4f3d5d6c6ddd1d89af5d3c1ddd8d1c6d5f4d2d1c6d79ad3dbc2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="64230506160d01084a2503110d0801160524020116074a030b12">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: February 12, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-03443 Filed 2-18-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Torke, Appellant, vs. Vogt and others, Respondents.

For the appellant: *Hammersley & Torke,*attorneys, and *Norton A. Torke,*of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondents: *Rodger M. Trump*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
# C_2005009EN.01000302.xml

| 13.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3486 — Magna/New Venture Gear)

(2005/C 9/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 24 September 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3486. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32004M3486. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

---
Attachment

proposed new

•

cog

•

ISOMOMOSI FOR I ma. SHRID0M, CIA

DR. .sranaza, ?SAC

GEM, SNIP

SULAICTs COMM Ilenement

Attached for your infornatien and advance perusal is a nemaresden on the above subject that I intend to mood to the SW Executive Candittee later this week.

At various the in the past, General Stewart and

have solicited your earents and views on the sore signiflo

.

sect aspects of COPAN& raiment. All of these have received very careful 

Executive trainees

consideration in arriving at wty proposals to the

If you are aware of any factors set previously Galled to wy attention which night impact in the attached, 'please se advise so as seas as p

ap ossible sod I will resider possible

ostnents. Otherwise, I anticipate sanding this prams* to the ItaOne en April Po MU

_• Alsood

Aloigandor IL Flats

Dixectov

Retire& Reesaasissence Office

Dr. Sheldon

Dr. Stelninger

Gen Martin

Dr.

,P1553

RIF-1

CORONA HANDLE 1.11"

CONTROL

teintrofillr?J/L,Ids
**
**Exhibit 8.1**

**List of Subsidiaries of SK Telecom Co., Ltd.**

**(As of December 31, 2017)**

 

**Subsidiary Name**
  
**Jurisdiction of Incorporation**

SK Telink Co., Ltd.
  Korea
SK m&service Co., Ltd.
  Korea
SK Communications Co., Ltd.
  Korea
SK Broadband Co., Ltd.
  Korea
K-net Culture and Contents Venture Fund
  Korea
PS&Marketing Co., Ltd.
  Korea
Service Ace Co., Ltd.
  Korea
Service Top Co., Ltd.
  Korea
Network O&S Co., Ltd.
  Korea
SK Planet Co., Ltd.
  Korea
NSOK Co., Ltd.
  Korea
Iriver Ltd.
  Korea
Iriver Enterprise Ltd.
  Hong Kong
Iriver Inc.
  U.S.A.
Iriver China Co., Ltd.
  China
Dongguan Iriver Electronics Co., Ltd.
  China
Groovers JP Ltd.
  Japan
SK Telecom China Holdings Co., Ltd.
  China
SK Global Healthcare Business Group, Ltd.
  Hong Kong
SK Planet Japan
  Japan
SKT Vietnam PTE., Ltd.
  Singapore
SK Planet Global PTE. Ltd.
  Singapore
SKP Global Holdings PTE. Ltd.
  Singapore
SKT Americas, Inc.
  U.S.A.
SKP America LLC
  U.S.A.
YTK Investment Ltd.
  Cayman Islands
Atlas Investment
  Cayman Islands
SK Telecom Innovation Fund, L.P.
  U.S.A.
SK Telecom China Fund I L.P.
  Cayman Islands
Shopkick Management Company, Inc.
  U.S.A.
Shopkick, Inc.
  U.S.A.
SK techx Co., Ltd.
  Korea
One Store Co., Ltd.
  Korea
Hello Nature Ltd.
  Korea
11street (Thailand) Co., Ltd.
  Thailand
S.M. Life Design Company Japan Inc.
  Japan
S.M. Mobile Communications Japan Inc.
  Japan
Home & Service Co., Ltd.
  Korea
SK stoa Co., Ltd.
  Korea**
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1385 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1385

To prohibit the Federal Government from requiring race or ethnicity to 
       be disclosed in connection with the transfer of a firearm.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2015

   Mr. Blunt (for himself, Mr. Manchin, and Mr. Enzi) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Federal Government from requiring race or ethnicity to 
       be disclosed in connection with the transfer of a firearm.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Firearm Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT REQUIRING RACE OR 
              ETHNICITY TO BE DISCLOSED IN CONNECTION WITH THE TRANSFER 
              OF A FIREARM.

    The Federal Government may not require any person to disclose the 
race or ethnicity of the person in connection with the transfer of a 
firearm to the person.
                                 <all>
```
#### Rozic (Jacob), Appellant, vs. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Company, Respondent. Rozic (Mary), Appellant, vs. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Company, Respondent.

For the appellants : *Cannon & Waldron*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent: *Shaw, Muskat & Sullivan*of Milwaukee.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


                     MICROS SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
              (unaudited - in thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Three months ended
                                                           September 30,
                                                         1996        1995
                                                         -------    -------
<S>                                                       <C>        <C>
Weighted-average number of common shares                   7,946      7,861
Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options                  25        117
                                                              --        ---
Weighted-average number of common and common
equivalent shares outstanding                              7,971      7,978
                                                           -----      -----
Net income                                                $2,327     $3,254
                                                          ======     ======
Net income per common and common equivalent share          $0.29      $0.41
                                                           =====      =====
</TABLE>





                                       16