alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regu l atory Eva lu a ti on

Docket No. F AA-2008-0681 Dire ctora t e Id en tifi er: 2008-NE-40 -AD ljyoumake chc.mg.es to the values inlh<! Lahle b<•lml'. you must £'//sure the! totals upclotc!**ucco diug~v.**  If they do 1101. 

### did (or Tab) imo om/then out(!/ !lie changed 

### t·e /1

. E s timated Costs: Action Co s t s per Pro du c t (e.g. , aircraft , e ngine , (e. g . , In spection , prope ller , appliance) Work-hours Labor Parts Co s t Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) ( include cost ( labo r + 

## u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do n o t include on condition costs here acce s s , testing ,**(@ ~85** **/h** part s) R egistered and c lo se -up) our) Pro du c t s 

### In spect the FCU 3- way union for co mpli a nce and 0.5 $14 

### 179 replace if non compliant.

Th e kn o w n number o f produc t s i n complia n ce: Total Co s t s of compliance for 

### U.S. fl eet:**~10 114**  Cost s cove re d un der wa rranty (if 

### known) 

## s

O n -C ond ition Cos t s: 

# gD Ac tion Work-hours Labor co s t Parts Cost Cos t p e r Produ ct ( e .g .. Inspection , (inc l ude access , ( @ $85 / hour) te s tin g, and close

- replacement) up )S pecia l co n s id e r a ti o n s f or Eco no mi c A na l ys is (Use thisfield to explain any thing in th e Estimated Costs tabl e that wa s assumed o r might not b e obv i o us. This .field can also be us ed to exp la in warranty cos ts ): 

### The re pl acem e nt parts are u nd e r warrant y. E xe cuti ve O rd e r 1 2 8 66 : 

### Co uld the AD be considered a .. sign ificant re g ulatory action'·? 

# G Y ES* 0**NO~** 

### *Explanation: DOT R eg ul atory P olici es a nd Pr o c e dures : 

### Is t h e AD s i g nificant ? YES* 0**NO~** 

### *Exp lanati o n: Reg ul atory F l ex ibili ty Act: 

### Will the AD ha ve a s ignificant eco n o mic impact on a s ubstantia l number of s m all e ntitie s? Explain f o r either a Ye s or No answer. 

# G YESO**NO~** 

### Explanation: Intr as t a te Av ia ti o n in A las ka : 

### This AD cou l d affect intra s tat e aviation in Ala s k a. I s it app r opriate t o include specific r e quirements for a irc r aft ope r ated in A l aska where aviati o n mig ht be th e o n ly mode of tran s po rtat i o n ? 

# G YES*0**NO~** 

### * Explan at i o n :
# C_2004129EN.01000101.xml

| 5.5.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 May 2004

(2004/C 129/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2061 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,53 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4412 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,6746 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1383 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5522 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,36 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2320 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9463 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5865 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 32,316 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,30 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4527 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6553 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4265 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7726 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 265 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 238,60 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 40,215 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 743 780 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6611 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6492 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,4071 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9151 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0454 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 411,74 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,3128 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2061

JPY

Japanese yen

132,53

DKK

Danish krone

7,4412

GBP

Pound sterling

0,6746

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1383

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5522

ISK

Iceland króna

88,36

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2320

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9463

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5865

CZK

Czech koruna

32,316

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,30

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4527

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6553

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4265

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7726

ROL

Romanian leu

40 265

SIT

Slovenian tolar

238,60

SKK

Slovak koruna

40,215

TRL

Turkish lira

1 743 780

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6611

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6492

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,4071

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9151

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0454

KRW

South Korean won

1 411,74

ZAR

South African rand

8,3128

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30576 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOHN RANDOLPH GANT, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CR-366-ALL-B

-------------------- February 21, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent John Randolph Gant has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gant has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
[ARTICLE]                    5
[MULTIPLIER]                 1
<TABLE>
<S>                         <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]               9-MOS
[PERIOD-START]              JAN-01-1996
[PERIOD-END]                SEP-30-1996

[CASH]                      437863
[SECURITIES]                0
[RECEIVABLES]               9423
[ALLOWANCES]                0
[INVENTORY]                 0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]            447286
[PP&E]                      30952097
[DEPRECIATION]              30191924
[TOTAL-ASSETS]              1207459
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]       170502
[BONDS]                     0
[COMMON]                    0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]       0
[PREFERRED]                 0
[OTHER-SE]                  1036957
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]1207459
[SALES]                     494188
[TOTAL-REVENUES]            494188
[CGS]                       0
[TOTAL-COSTS]               0
[OTHER-EXPENSES]            0
[LOSS-PROVISION]            0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]          0
<INCOME-EXPENSE>            0
[INCOME-PRETAX]             238356
[INCOME-TAX]                0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]         238356
[DISCONTINUED]              0
[EXTRAORDINARY]             0
[CHANGES]                   0
[NET-INCOME]                238356
[EPS-PRIMARY]               .00
[EPS-DILUTED]               .00
</TABLE>
-Want

1E4 NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C. luntliWint

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR

MEMORANDUM FOR rut. PLUMMER

SUBJECT: Senate Select Committee Staff Briefing

This morning we presented an NRO overview briefing to

Messrs. Curtis Smothers, Alton Quanbeck and Barry Carter of

the Senate Select Committee Staff. Lt Colonel Coyle provided

information on the history, organization and policy of the

NRO, Colonel Wheeler described the systems and their missions

and Mr. Hill provided an overview of the budget. I sat in on

the entire briefing which lasted over five hours. Mr. Smothers

had to leave following Lt Colonel Coyle's segment.

The staff members received the briefing well and asked

several questions regarding the systems and their modus

operandi which appeared to be somewhat outside their primary

area of interest. They also seemed interested in our management structure and in our interface with the intelligence

community. We emphasized that with respect to the conduct

of our affairs, we are subjected to a great deal of intensive

high level oversight and are a hardware intensive operation

and not one associated with intelligence activities of concern to the Senate Select Committee.

Following the briefing, we had some informal discussion

about the need for protecting the information and we were

assured that the Committee staff who would have access to

the information would be limited only to those people with

whom we are •already familiar. We explained that our relationship with the Committee would be handled within the DOD as

a special arrangement and we would provide information to

the Committee through Mr. Latimer based on specific requests

as opposed to the general requests for information. Mr. Carter

Cl amen111111,7 FROM

Gaiums. pas OF

ammo. amar X TOON CATI

000V Mt anuataev ON S OUT.

CONTROL NO

COPY OF COPIES

PAGE OF PASES
TOP-Stent

expressed interest in obtaining some of the documents pertaining

to our legal status and also wanted some copies of the briefing

which related to the organization structure and interface. We

agreed to provide those through Mr. Latimer upon a specific

request.

In summary, the briefing appeared to have gone well. We

believe that the Committee will not exhibit a direct interest

in our affairs and we also believe that our activities are

not of the nature which would be inherently suspect. Mr. Quanbeck

stated before departure that the Committee's main interest would

be to arrive at some sort of legislation to preclude abuses

of the intelligence process by the intelligence community. We

confirmed to the staff that we would provide any information

required and that we were confident that they were perceptive

of the need to carefully handle the informati we w ld provide.

C

OAMIAMoM Wipmem

UMMatOW Miftrig

lianCu►.va MOH' 1 1111 Warimuftestil

ION. IMINCimell0 • Om* el ►

00NTR01. NO Tnternal

COPY OF COPIES

__2_ PAGES
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 50511 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ARTURO GARCIA, also known as Arturo Garcia Lopez , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:15

- CR

- 2011

- 1

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Arturo Garcia has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia h a s no t filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 21, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-50511 Document: 00513883215 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017No. 16

- 50511

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for le ave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-50511 Document: 00513883215 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
# C_2005093EN.01002702.xml

| 16.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/27

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 3 February 2005

in Case T-172/03 Nicole Heurtaux v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Officials - Refusal of promotion - Absence of statement of reasons - Comparative examination of merits - Action for annulment)

(2005/C 93/54)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-172/03: Nicole Heurtaux, an official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Brussels (Belgium), represented by J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal, A. Coolen and S. Orlandi, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: by J. Curall and V. Joris, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for annulment of the Commission's decision of 14 August 2002 not to promote the applicant to Grade B 2 under the 2002 promotion exercise — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of P. Lindh, President, J.D. Cooke and D. Šváby, Judges; I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 3 February 2005, in which it:

| 1. | Annuls the Commission's decision of 14 August 2002 not to promote the applicant to Grade B 2 under the 2002 promotion exercise. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the Commission's decision of 14 August 2002 not to promote the applicant to Grade B 2 under the 2002 promotion exercise.

| 2. | Orders the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 184 of 2.8.2003.

1

---
the content of the development plan, and in

20 March 2956

installed at aFFIC.

Information vas Surnished him fron the most recent
| Savised that RDSC had this most recent information.

DD.m.96 SAPLACED Wee PURAL 1 OGY <, wonces maT Ce}

2. Received 10 s of WDD Plan of this date. Copies
distributed as follows,’ RDGS (for 250), On, RDB, do (acetate ety to mDeP),
RDGP, RDSC, RDSI, RDSM, RDSO, and RDST. General Sessuns was subsequently briefed on.

: bnvlget changes indicated as compared to the 18 lov 55 development plan. "

| 1. Col Matthews, AFCGM, called regarding disposition of a ten ton/day LOX .
plant originally scheduled for AFMTC. Subsequent action between Col Matthews, Col
Helmer, WOSK, and Maj Rash, ROSM, determined that the plant would be initially

3. derieultinn expreased be are: Teva's sbeence, to advise hin of the |
funding difficulties expressed by AFCIE on the speed-up Missile Assenbly Building q
"L" at APC end steps being taken by HIS to eliminate the problen.

4. Together with Colonels Bichel, Jacobson, Hamilton, Mathison, and Dr. Nichols |
attended a presentation by General Yates and Colonel APMIc

Plan. Some of the problems which thie presentation posed were subsequently disouased
by the group with aFMtc representatives.

1. Mr. Connor, RDZP, requested information on WDD P-600 funding for FY 57,

1. Received a THX from APOOP containing SAC recommendation that Beale AFB be
considered as SM-65 site. Forvarded sane to WDD and

on the financial plan and



DOVINGRADED AT 3 YEA Hi. -
DECLASSIFIED AFTER 12 YEAR:

DOD DIR

5269.10

wd
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




I,
      Donald
      S. Robbins, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the
      Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of CSMG Technologies, Inc. for the year ended
      December 31, 2007 (the “Form 10-K/A”), that the Form 10-K/A fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Form
      10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of CSMG Technologies, Inc. for the periods covered by
      the
      Form 10-K/A.


Dated:
              May 20, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Donald
              S.
              RobbinsDonald
                S. Robbins
              Chief
                Executive Officer




I,
      K.
      Bruce Jones, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the
      Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of CSMG Technologies, Inc. for the year ended
      December 31, 2007 (the “Form 10-K/A”), that the Form 10-K/A fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Form
      10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of CSMG Technologies, Inc. for the periods covered by
      the
      Form 10-K/A.


Dated:
              May 20, 2008
            By:
            /s/ K.
              Bruce
              JonesK.
                  Bruce Jones
                Chief
                  Financial Officer




This
      certification accompanies each Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the
      Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Colonel, USAF

Director

L

\IIIIATIONALRECONNAISSANCEOFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

20 January 1976

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. PLUMMER

SUBJECT: NRO Point Papers

At the right are the five following NRO point papers:

The Role of the DNRO

Streamlined Management - Control Within the NRO

Congressional Relations (The Old and the Developing

Security of the NRP Including "Fact Of"/Facts About

e. The Role of the NRP ExCom

These are for your use in discussing the unique role of

the NRO with senior levels of management.

#004". "aft.*

J.t.• Q474.....

THE NRO STAFF

nrstatu--- Mecums atom IMF VOIEPTIONSATS

SSW Ott SONANWISS AO NFL

CONTROL NOilltaZnal.

COPY OF COPIES

PAGE OF PAGES
VS& •

STREAMLINED MANAGEMENT - CONTROL WITHIN THE NRO

", 4 -.The .concept• of vatreamlined aanagemene.provides. the esseri-, 

tial management and operation within the NRO to assume timely

and effective management, command and control of NRP resources.

"Streamlined management" consists of the following methods:

The DNRO presently has resource allocation authority

within a fenced budget. This provides him budgetary flexibility.

The DNRO has direct access to his line organization elements. This short vertical up and down chain makes his

programs highly responsive and makes him directly accessible to

his program managers.

The DNRO controls end-to-end system contracting and

procedures which, therefore, makes it responsive.

The NRP enjoys strict internal review by select

audit organizations and personnel. This limits indiscriminate

reviews by any number of agencies that might feel a necessity

to intervene in NRP matters.

The special security required for collection system;

protection provides a management spinoff by allowing conduct of

NRP system acquisition, conduct and operations in, essentially;,

a sanctuary environment.' This environment prevents unwarranted

external intrusion into NIP activities.

As a national organization, the SRO is integrated

and interagency manned by highly qualified personnel motivated

emr---- •

0114061% IP

IMO. NM

. .

CONTROL NO•

COP, Of COPIES

PAGE OF PAGES

-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN ITEM 1 ON PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S REPORT ON
FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          83,737
<SECURITIES>                                     4,172
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,696
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,942
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               133,169
<PP&E>                                         145,155
<DEPRECIATION>                                  83,007
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 212,006
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          143,526
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,042)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   212,006
<SALES>                                        136,839
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               136,839
<CGS>                                           84,656
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   84,656
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                62,316
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,129)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,129)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,129)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)
        

</TABLE>
October 17, 1961

WOKIltAlIDOK VCR VA. URI LAID

The attachmest indicates recent changes that have been

introduced into the satellite recomaissamce program. The

aim has been to enhance the capability at an early date while

seeking to insure the introduction of the higher resolution

capability in the earliest possible time period. The following are the =pc mew elements:

The elimination of the "Ie flights in 1961 with the

substitution of C prime and C triple prim payloads.

The Augmentation of the 11 program from five to 15

firings in 1962.

The modification of additional pad facilities to

permit a MO lam& rate of It payloads in 1962. This will

provide a capability for three such firlags and me MASH

firing of a similar vehicle per math.

The introduction of a simple cloud cover satellite

program enployimg the SCOUT vale'e for the purpose of giving

continuous cloud coverage data an the Simo-Soviet landmass

beginning is April or May, 1962.

Significant amassment changes have been introduced in

the case of various contractors, but in particular in the

case of Lockheed Aircraft Corporation whom a UMW •reeriAlata• .

tins is is process of implammtation. The AGM overall

n••

:4;7 SPCC.i.: 1.
reliability of about 30X, the high costs and the loft

schedule times costInme to be of concern. 114 have initiated

a thorough analysis of design procedures, particularly with

regard to the AMA vehicle. ♦ special advisory group has

been established under the chairmanship of Mr. C. L. Johnson

with the aim of asking specific recommendations that can

improve quality, shorten schedules and result in a mare

efficient use of financial resources. The schedule shown

in the attachment and the items rooted above represent the

picture as of today, however, an intensive review of the

entire program is being undertaken at present and a full

report on the total program and the changes therein will be

presented in two or three weeks.

-J.

Joseph V. Charyk

Att.

•
A CIAO

A (10/60

C WO)

C

2 -

IN

IS SO It

• • IS • • • de UP

0 lb MD alb 1111 •

ID alb fib • ID la

IMP

▪

0 • OD et

I • I

IND • •

••1

ur JLVI %L

NATIONAL RECOHNANSANCE PROGRAM

PHOTOGRAPHIC SATELLITES 

$1

T

(12 63

MA 1177A SON

C1/S1)

11(10/14

- - -

ID 60

& - 2 2 1 - -

1 - 2 3 3 3 - •

x-s

£4

1111, ED

- 1 I - 1 1 1-

11. 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -

Rot two Digits innett dos to omplostos es pod.

Ilsoad 114 -Doe 111. osier knew rovlo ► dos to MIDAS coolliot.

,11

ar Lula littiviaAmiiia

1-0 r

ta .1.11 t