alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           UT
<LEGEND>
                    THIS SCHEDULE   CONTAINS   SUMMARY   FINANCIAL   INFORMATION
                    EXTRACTED FROM NEW CENTURY ENERGIES, INC. BALANCE SHEET AS
                    OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
                    REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                               PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                     0
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                   0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      200
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                      0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              200
<COMMON>                                    200
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                     0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>              200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                          0
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                            0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                     0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                 0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                     0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                   0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                0
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               200
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                     0
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                          0
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    0
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    0
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                       0
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                            0
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                   0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                 0
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                     0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                        0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0
        


</TABLE>
NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

VW VIA BYEIAAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

DEPARTMENT Of' THE AIR FORCE 

OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY 

TOR RECK' 

MEMORANDUM 

18 May 1967 

Colonel Worthman: 

General Stewart had this one delivered 

personally to General Berg. Stevie passed 

it to me after General Berg noted with a 

comment in the margin. I distributed to the 

RF and SS-7, and returned General Berg's 

copy to Stevie. 

I'm sure General Berg reminded 

General Stewart that advanced planning for 

achieving was a responsibility of SAFSP, 

not of the MOL System Office. 

Attachment 

HANDLE VIA BYEMAN 

CPUTR91 SrTal TOP, SECRET 
Major General, MAP 

4ki•-••us-Yitiii.Direator, NZ Program t .1 

L v-- 

Page 3. of 1 page 

Copy -of ea 

2ANSL Fa 211 

Copies: BAF-BLM 

SAF-BL Green 

= Read DOR/AN 

HAND VIA BYEMAN 

CONT46t BYSTEM ()NV:. 

NRO APPROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 HANDLE VIA BYEMAN 

4.0...:444.44A -111111.V 4-4-4.4.44444■10.114. 

1 1111111MNIVIERM 

MEMDRANDUM FOR DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DAL PROGRAM 

SUBJECT: Advanced Planning, 

- -- 

On April 11, 1967 representatives from the Systems Office 

and Aerospace briefed me on three subjects. The briefings covered 

(1) advancedganantg_leti glatAlikth_aehieving a 

resolution capability, (2) the feasibility and program 

-rdoirf7fiaTEEW to rilanntary nivations by MOL, and (3) the factors 

involved in with MOL. Your position and ream:ends* 

tions on these subjects, as contained in your two memoranda of April 10, 

1967 and your more recent memorandum of May 3, 1967, have been noted 

4 and integrated into our considerations on these topics. 

N

• / I BU ort in principle your plan for studies and technology 

invesigations lead 

i■!‘ 

Yx: 

lroectgamodestlevelof 

actv"yand'l 

in " 69 simil.ar~~ 

you FT

v certainly necessary before moving to the funded activity in FY 69. 

I expect that, following further discussions, more specific madame 

4‘ 

can be provideituslz_the firat_gfaLklyj 

With respect to the.accmplishment of planetary observation on 

MCL flights, you should take those steps necessary to incorporate into 

the vehicle and mission planning that capability identified in the 

briefing as recommendation number one; i.e., photography of Mercury, 

Venus and Mars without equipment modification. Planning of any further 

capability, made possible by means of a camera-back modification, must 

await en analysis of cost and technical implications resulting from 

such a modification. I expect a further memo from you once this 

analysis is completed. 

I concur in the position you set forth in your 

May 3, 1967 memorandum, and ask that you initiate,thaneeessary studies. 

• 

Maj Campbell/SAF-SLM/55674/1May67/ams 

Rewritten/May Campbell/9M1467/ate T. gnimpte
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Easy Care Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Gary Patterson, Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>21 Century Advantage Ins. Co., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Gary Tsirelman, P.C. (Joseph Padrucco, Esq.), for appellant.Law Offices of Buratti, Rothenberg &amp; Burns (Leslie A. Eyma, Jr., Esq.), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Robin Kelly Sheares, J.), entered October 27, 2014. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that it had fully paid plaintiff for the services at issue in accordance with the workers' compensation fee schedule.</p><p>Contrary to plaintiff's contention, the proof submitted by defendant in support of its motion was sufficient to give rise to a presumption that the denial of claim form had been properly mailed (<i>see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co.</i>, 50 AD3d 1123 [2008]) and to demonstrate that it had properly used the workers' compensation fee schedule to determine the amount which plaintiff was entitled to receive for the services at issue.</p><p>Accordingly, the order is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: December 19, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
101.4.4.

+5i- NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 11111111111111pElli

THE NRO STAFF February 24, 1972

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. McLUCAS tui.5.--;-4:

SUBJECT: Update on NSAM 156 Activity

The papers to the right were originally provided to

you as backup for your January 26 discussion with Mr. Helms

on the subject of "fact of."

The current status, as of February 24, is as follows:

•

There was no January meeting of the NSAM 156 working

group to finalize the report as originally planned. Two

factors contributed to this--Ambassador Johnson's illness

and Mr. Helm's and your modified positions which were informally

made known to the Working Group Chairman, Mr. Gathright.

The Staff has prepared a letter for your signature

which restates the NRO position on "fact of." Although the

letter is addressed to Ambassador Johnson, Mr. Irwin will

take some form of action on it.

The Verification Panel has not yet elected to take

up the question of ratification of SALT.

Owing to the large differences in thinking concerning

"fact of" which exist between the various agencies, there

does not appear to be a clearly resolvable position possible

from which to base a definitive recommendation in response

to your original request. Mr. Irwin is going to be approached

by Mr. Gathright with the suggestion that the exercise not be

concluded because of the divergence of views and little chance

of reconciliation and also because the precise situation

involving ratification is not yet known. Mr. Gathright will

also suggest to Mr. Irwin that the State Department should

examine the legal issues of satellite observation in view of

SALT "national means" and "sovereign territory" terminology

and that State should investigate third country attitudes.

UMMaillate

10P-SECRET110.3111111 POW 111110311 .13 11341111111134 0333 1 1)11.......1...1111311$

NU ammo 0000 10 1110111•1031 41114.•

cmliftm Internal 

CO.. Or OHMS
101)-SECREF 4111111w

In summary, if OSD supports the NRO on protecting the

"fact of" and if CIA does not change back to a more lenient

view of "fact of," a fair hearing of the issue in connection

with SALT ratification will be possible.

1111.11,

Major, USAF

L : • Iv

TOVsEeREF

ratt.sf ••••• •I •00a • L •C•n••/

30) COPICIltl SIM: ICI DOC, ,47.: a► r.•

comma Internal 

CO•I Ow COM)

PLICM Or 2 ••CtS
lifierAW'ROVED FOR 

RELEASE 1 JULY 2015 

•

rnai 

BT 

K100CC 

EIS/ff NO TVO 

giadla via BYIMAN 

PRIORITY 

rat WIRRAL KARIM 

ONO ANICSAL 

_0-11 _7 

Ref unto* itaans to swoon TV in mats reauxtbanv tst 

TOM, Idit most MI MUM IN TOM AFR =TIAN 

4111 1AVE &WADY IICLUIND ~LATE FY 19$6 FO101114 

COST SIIINISSION* ON T1E AMMON IRO TIM /TINS OWNED 1-4 

MKT THE SWIM DALAI= OF T14I 934 MICR FM INIICH AN 

OILINATION AIIINORITY IS NECISHORY* 

CENSOR OF TM MIME MS MD OPTICAL IIANTNU AS 011114/433 LL-1 PART II. YOU ANC AUTIMIZED HMI= 60*ANEAD WITH TIE PRO* 

IN PART IV OF YOUR WHAM FY 66 FUNDS tar 91,4 MILLION TO 

COVE* AUTIONTIZATION WILL BE IMOD IN A DORIAN MIMI 

Amway TO BE Van SNWTLY. 114431TIFWION An LINE raw 

410KTIFICATION CF ANY imernavo, mica noon SILL BE 91101 4?-2 

IN MI 15 APRIL 46 COST stangszon. 

PAW III* AUTINVOZATION TO PROCEED vrrx re FACILITY RIONWita ---"!L L. 

NM AT tures KART IS ALSO 0REVITED ACOORDAN: VIM PART 

V OF YOUR MOM* TIC sevinass $aa'nuaos Fon VT 1964 

WILL RE MID CH A MUM OBLIGATION AUTHORITY RAWLY* 

—41-re-ort-Tant 5442 eassge MARTIN TM FLU TWO 4DERAL 8Z 

11594 APPICHAL DORIAN A RCN 16419 

fwa VI ROM FY $7 ASE 15 APR 66 DOWN AMMO 

WHIG 4171 FY 1966 

934 (10414FAD DONIAN PART IV FY 66 $1.6 A DORIAN 

15 APRIL 66 

maw KODAK TUT V $E*7 PY1%6 A DORIAN

81 

RUt 45911 

PIN PINNITAN APPROWL IS NIVEA TO P ROM Ku TIE. jrnowassor MILO LOW IJAD MAW WPM AT A RON 

W MAIN NW* Al 01"110XN PMT VI OF REFERIONSV G 

..1 

NA
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 22 May 2006         

on the extension of the limited recognition of the Hellenic Register of Shipping to the Republic of Malta

(notified under document number C(2006) 1990)

(Only the Maltese text is authentic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/382/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 94/57/EC of 22 November 1994 on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations (1), and in particular Article 4(3) thereof,

Having regard to the letter of 15 September 2004 from the Maltese authorities requesting the extension to Malta of limited recognition of the Hellenic Register of Shipping (hereinafter HRS) pursuant to Article 4(2) of Directive 94/57/EC,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The effects of the limited recognition of the Hellenic Register of Shipping granted by Decision 2001/890/EC are extended to the Republic of Malta.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Malta.

Done at Luxembourg, 22 May 2006            

For the Commission

Jacques BARROT            

Vice-President

----

(1)OJ L 319, 12.12.1994, p. 20.

(2)OJ L 329, 14.12.2001, p. 72.

(3)OJ L 219, 24.8.2005, p. 43.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,482
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,242
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        591
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,296
<PP&E>                                             594
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,548
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            56
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,984
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,753
<SALES>                                          5,624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                            2,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,858
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,618
<INCOME-TAX>                                       213
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,397
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,397
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.49


</TABLE>
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please

2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 

3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated

4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does

5 not include the filing date. 

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 PROPERTY OWNERS COMMITTEE

8 OF RANCHO RUIDOSO VALLEY ESTATES, 

9 Plaintiff-Appellee,

10 vs. No. 29,439

11 COUNTY OF LINCOLN,

12 Defendant,

13 and

14 RABBI Y’HOSHUA COHEN,

15 Applicant/Intervenor-Appellant.

16 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LINCOLN COUNTY

17 Karen L. Parsons, District Judge

18 John Robert Beauvais

19 Ruidoso, NM

20 for Appellee

21 Rabbi Y’Hoshua Cohen

22 Alto, NM

23 Pro Se Appellant
2

1 MEMORANDUM OPINION

2 VIGIL, Judge.

3 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

4 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has

5 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

6 AFFIRMED.

7 IT IS SO ORDERED.

8 ________________________________

9 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 

10 WE CONCUR:

11 ________________________________

12 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

13 ________________________________

14 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Daou Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
John A. Roberts, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ John A. Roberts                  
|John A. Roberts                      
|Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|May 14, 2004
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC ContractorsFRAPCON-3.4 and FRAPCON-3.5 (NUREG/CR-7022)

# FRAPCON-3.5: Integral Assessment (NUREG/CR-7022, Volume 2, Revision 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-7022, Volume 2, Revision 1 (PDF - 2.04 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** May 2014**Date Published:** October 2014

**Prepared by:** K. J. Geelhood and W. G. Luscher

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, WA 99352

P. Raynaud, NRC Project Manager

NRC Job Code V6197

Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

An integral assessment has been performed for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to quantify the predictive capabilities of FRAPCON-3, a steady-state fuel behavior code designed to analyze fuel behavior from beginning-of-life to rod-average burnup levels of 62 gigawatt-days per metric ton of uranium and above. FRAPCON-3 code calculations are shown to compare satisfactorily to a preselected set of experimental data with steady-state operating conditions.

This document describes the assessment of FRAPCON-3.5, which is the latest version of FRAPCON-3, released May 2014.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 31, 2000 and 1999, the Consolidated
Statements of Operations for each of the three years ended January 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998, and the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the
three years ended January 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                               15,652
<SECURITIES>                                            386
<RECEIVABLES>                                         6,787
<ALLOWANCES>                                            637
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     24,071
<PP&E>                                                7,541
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (1,957)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       30,336
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 5,782
<BONDS>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                148
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                           15,632
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         30,336
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     36,309
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        22,944
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     14,134
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    (321)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (448)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          (137)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (311)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (311)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.02)


</TABLE>
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1182 

To exempt application of JSA attribution rule in case of existing agreements. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2015 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. SCOTT, and Ms. MIKULSKI) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To exempt application of JSA attribution rule in case of 

existing agreements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF APPLICATION OF JSA ATTRIBU4 TION RULE FOR EXISTING AGREEMENTS. 

5 In the case of a party to a joint sales agreement (as 

6 defined in Note 2(k) to section 73.3555 of title 47, Code 

7 of Federal Regulations) that is in effect on the effective 

8 date of the amendment to Note 2(k)(2) to such section 

9 made by the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and 

10 Report and Order adopted by the Commission on March 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1182 IS

1 31, 2014 (FCC 14–28), such party shall not be considered 

2 to be in violation of the ownership limitations of such sec3 tion by reason of the application of the rule in such Note 

4 2(k)(2) (as so amended) to the joint sales agreement. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS