alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### McNett and others, Appellants, vs. Fox, Respondent.

For the appellants: *Stephens & Burns*of Cuba City.

For the respondent: *Kopp & Brunckhorst*of Platteville.

*By the Court.*

Judgment affirmed.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 12 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt employees with 

health coverage under TRICARE or the Veterans Administration from 

being taken into account for purposes of determining the employers 

to which the employer mandate applies under the Patient Protection 

and Affordable Care Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 6, 2015 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself, Ms. AYOTTE, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. BURR, Mr. COCHRAN, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. ENZI, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. HATCH, 

Mr. KIRK, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. MORAN, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. PORTMAN, 

Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. SCOTT, Mr. THUNE, Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. 

VITTER, and Mr. HOEVEN) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 

employees with health coverage under TRICARE or the 

Veterans Administration from being taken into account 

for purposes of determining the employers to which the 

employer mandate applies under the Patient Protection 

and Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 12 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hire More Heroes Act 

3 of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EMPLOYEES WITH HEALTH COVERAGE UNDER 

5 TRICARE OR THE VETERANS ADMINISTRA6 TION NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN DETER7 MINING EMPLOYERS TO WHICH THE EM8 PLOYER MANDATE APPLIES UNDER PATIENT 

9 PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT. 

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4980H(c)(2) of the Inter11 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the 

12 end the following: 

13 ‘‘(F) EXEMPTION FOR HEALTH COVERAGE

14 UNDER TRICARE OR THE VETERANS ADMINIS15 TRATION.—Solely for purposes of determining 

16 whether an employer is an applicable large em17 ployer under this paragraph for any month, an 

18 individual shall not be taken into account as an 

19 employee for such month if such individual has 

20 medical coverage for such month under— 

21 ‘‘(i) chapter 55 of title 10, United 

22 States Code, including coverage under the 

23 TRICARE program, or 

24 ‘‘(ii) under a health care program 

25 under chapter 17 or 18 of title 38, United 

26 States Code, as determined by the SecVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:11 Jan 08, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S12.IS S12

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 12 IS

1 retary of Veterans Affairs, in coordination 

2 with the Secretary of Health and Human 

3 Services and the Secretary.’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 subsection (a) shall apply to months beginning after De6 cember 31, 2013. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2005006EN.01003901.xml

| 8.1.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/39

---

Action brought on 30 September 2004 by Dirk Klaas against the European Parliament

(Case T-393/04)

(2005/C 6/76)

Language of the case: German

An action against the European Parliament was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 30 September 2004, by Dirk Klaas, represented by R. Moos, Rechtsanwalt.

The Applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Declare void the annulment of 2 promotion points by the Director General for Personnel on 12 February 2004, confirmed by the letter of rejection from the Secretary General of the European Parliament of 30 June 2004, insofar as 2 promotion points, which had been awarded for the period before 1999, were taken away from the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare void the annulment of 2 promotion points by the Director General for Personnel on 12 February 2004, confirmed by the letter of rejection from the Secretary General of the European Parliament of 30 June 2004, insofar as 2 promotion points, which had been awarded for the period before 1999, were taken away from the applicant;

| — | Annul that letter in that respect and declare that the 2 promotion points are to be carried over to subsequent years; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul that letter in that respect and declare that the 2 promotion points are to be carried over to subsequent years;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant is an official of the Parliament. He was promoted to A6 with retrospective effect as of 1 January 1999. In the course of the promotion procedure all the promotion points earned by the applicant before 1999 were removed from him. By way of grounds, the Parliament referred to the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case T-30/02 Leonhardt v Parliament, which, in its view, allowed the removal of points.

In support of his application the applicant argued that the transitional rule that all points earned before 1999 were to be removed in the event of promotion, was in breach of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations. In the view of the applicant, that rule was unnecessary, disproportionate and contrary to the principle of equality. He also submitted that the present case was not comparable to Case T-30/02.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001015298
<NAME>                        Alyn Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    USD

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                              2,644
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                         914
<ALLOWANCES>                          271
<INVENTORY>                         1,515
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    4,916
<PP&E>                             22,761
<DEPRECIATION>                      5,010
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     24,110
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               3,172
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               4,552
<PREFERRED>                             4
<COMMON>                               13
<OTHER-SE>                          8,890
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       24,110
<SALES>                             2,248
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    2,248
<CGS>                               7,934
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      15,101
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     (517)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  (12,853)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  2,077
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (15,447)
<INCOME-TAX>                        1,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (15,448)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      (861)
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      (16,309)
<EPS-BASIC>                          1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                        1.43


</TABLE>
-(SrNATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. O.C.

THE NRO STARE

or,

Deputy Assistant for Advanced

Systems

Functions: NASA

• .1/Functions:

TOP SECLIET

7 December 1968

MEMORANDUMINOCO OFFICE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS

SUBJECT: Authorization to Reproduce and Change Control Number

mil

ou are authorized to reproduce the attached document

900-66) on a strict need-to-know basis in the TKH system.

Reference to memoranda 740-66) will have to be

removed in the TKH version.

--TOP-SECRET- cacwaca ISDN 4.001uric

"11111-1-66

pC:::n=1/•:7=COPIII

0•11ti
T07 SEC:Eir

1St- NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

THE NRO STAFF

7 December 1966

MEMORAM)UM FOR MAJOR GENERAL HAYES

SUBJECT: U. S. Army Experiments in Multiband Synoptic Photography

In a recent memoranda 40-66) to all military

departments, limitations and ons were placed on military

participation in NASA earth-sensing experiments.

•

Conferences with and briefings by representatives of your

office during the past year have made me aware of the U. S. Army's

strong interest in multiband synoptic photography experiments. I

would like to invite your comments and recommendations for carrying

out such an experiments using aircraft available to the V.-RO. I am

thinking specifically of U-2 flights over selected sites in the United

States, if U-2 altitudes are needed for meaningful experiments. I

believe it would be worthwhile to examine this possibility, discussing

flight requirements, camera configurations, application of the results

to military problems, and related

. r General. USAF

-TOP-SECREf--

[SWAMP f ION aurora= armuorli

:re : '•C CSCO'O VMS VIT smIty

111111111110_ 900-66

7,:T.,Teeft"
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              Exhibit 12.1
                                                    Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


                                                                                  For the Years Ended December 31,
                                                                 -----------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                    1999          1998          1997          1996          1995
                                                                 -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
                                                                                           (In thousands)
<S>                                                               <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Pretax income (loss) from continuing operations................   $ 36,389      $(206,291)    $(168,056)    $(87,986)     $(17,233)

Add back:
  (Losses) earnings from less-than-50.0%-owned persons.........     11,614         10,299         2,286        4,503         4,327
  Minority interest in subsidiary..............................    (13,609)             -             -            -             -
  Fixed charges:
    Interest, whether expensed or capitalized, including
      amortization of deferred financing costs.................     69,470         56,705        43,994       22,194            30
                                                                  --------      ---------     ---------     --------      --------

Adjusted income (loss).........................................    103,864       (139,287)     (121,776)     (61,289)      (12,876)
Fixed charges..................................................     69,470        (56,705)      (43,994)     (22,194)          (30)
                                                                  --------      ---------     ---------     --------      --------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.............................       1.50              -             -            -             -
Amount of coverage deficiency..................................   $      -      $(195,992)    $(165,770)    $(83,483)     $(12,906)
                                                                  ========      =========     =========    =========      ========
</TABLE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

GREAT LAKES NATIONAL PROGRAM OFFICE 

77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD 

CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590 \ PRO^ & 

JUL 1 1 2014 

Lynn Fiedler 

Acting Chief, Air Quality Division 

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality 

P.O. Box 30473 

Lansing, Michigan 48909 

Dear Ms. Fiedler: 

This letter is in response to your July 10, 2014, submission of the Clean Air Act (CAA) section 

110(a)(1) and (2), "infrastructure" state implementation plan (SIP) for the 2008 8-hour ozone, 

2010 nitrogen dioxide (N02 ), 2010 sulfur dioxide (S02 ), and 2012 annual fine particle (PM2.5) 

National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and the subsequent clarification letter dated 

July 11, 2014. The requested submission is intended to demonstrate that the state of Michigan 

has all necessary authority, resources, and personnel to implement and satisfactorily complete the 

air quality management requirements set forth in section 110(a)(1) and (2) of the CA A with 

respect to each NAAQS. 

Specifically, the SIP submission is intended to address the requirements of CA A section 

110(a)(2)(A) - section 110(a)(2)(M) for each NAAQS, with the following exceptions: section 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 ozone, 2010 S02, and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS, i.e., 

Michigan's SIP submission intended to address section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) applies only to the 

2010 NO2 NAAQS; and, section 110(a)(2)(I) for each NAAQS, as the requirements contained in 

this section are not part of the infrastructure SIP process. 

E PA has determined that the submission is complete for each of the remaining elements for each 

NAAQS. A finding of completeness merely indicates that the submission meets the criteria that 

any plan must satisfy for EPA to take rulemaking action on it. A completeness finding is not a 

finding on the merits of the plan or whether it meets EPA's SIP approval requirements. 

If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me, or Andy Chang, of 

my staff, at 312-886-0258. 

Air and Radiation Division 

Printed on ® ecycled Paper
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

August 9, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh 134628 (3) Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. TYRONE SLUSSER, #236917 Stephen J. Markman, Justices
Petitioner-Appellant,

v SC: 134628 AGC: 0971/07 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION,

Respondent-Appellee.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Ju stice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it is DENIED because MCL 600.2 963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Within 21 days of the certification of this order, petitioner shall pay to the Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $11.00, shall submit a copy of this order with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being filed in this Court. If petitioner timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to petitioner’s account un til the payments equal the balance due of $364.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) petitioner shall not file further appeals in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to petitioner and return petitioner’s pleadin gs with this order.

jm I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 9, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit
      32.1











**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, the undersigned officer of Tanger Properties Limited Partnership (the
      “ Operating
      Partnership ”)
      hereby
      certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)  the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
      March 31, 2007 (the “ Report ”)
      fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating
      Partnership.





Pursuant
      to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this
      certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.





Date:
                May 3, 2007
            /s/
              Stanley K. TangerStanley
                K. Tanger
              Chief
                Executive Officer of Tanger GP Trust, Sole General Partner of the
                Registrant
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Unified Western Grocers, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended December 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alfred A. Plamann, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the
Report.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 13, 2007



/s/    ALFRED A. PLAMANNAlfred A. PlamannPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)




A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Lakeisha Demerson, MD v. Kiesta Smith, Individually and as next friend of XXXXXX XXXXXX, a minor

Appellate case number: 01

- 22

- 00579

- CV

Trial court case number: 20 22

- 01500

Trial court: 270th District Court of Harris County

On A ugust 17, 2022, th e t rial court reporter filed a recorder ’ s record of two electronically recorded proceeding s held on Jul y 18, 2022

. On August 30, 2022, th is Court issu ed an order explainin g tha t t he filed record d id not comply with T exas Rules of Appell ate P roced ure 34.6 (a)(2) and 13.2 because the re corder ’s record d id not contain certified copies of the court

reco rder ’ s log (s)

. We ordered c ourt re p orter Julia Rivera t o file certified copi es of the required log ( s ) within 30 days of our order pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 34. 6( a)(2) and

13.2

.
On September 2, 2022, Ms. Rivera filed a court recorder ’ s log for a separate hear ing held on August 22, 2022 , as well as a rec ording o f th at h e aring

. None of the required logs we ordered

her to file for the two Jul y 18, 2022 proceedings h a s been filed

.

P ursuant to Texas Rule s of Appellate Procedure 34. 6( a)(2) and 13.2

, c ourt re p orter Julia

Rivera is ORDER E D to file certified copies of the required log ( s ) for the July 18, 2022 hearings within 30 days of the date of this order

. Appel lant ’ s brief will be due 30 da ys after the court reporter files a compl ia nt recorder ’ s

re cord for th e July 18 , 2022 hearings

. See T EX

. R. A P P

. P. 38.6 (a)

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica R i vas

- Molloy

Acting individually

Date: September 8, 2022
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

                    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463 as amended), the National Science                           ( print page 8354)                        Foundation announces the following meeting:                

*Name:*                         Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research (#1203); Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC), Duke University Site Visit.                    

*Dates & Times:*

May 13, 2015; 7:15 p.m.-9:00 p.m.

May 14, 2015; 7:15 a.m.-8:30 p.m.

May 15, 2015; 7:15 a.m.-4:00 p.m.

*Place:*                         Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Part open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Daniele Finotello, Program Director, Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers Program, Division of Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-4676.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning further support of the MRSEC at Duke University.                    

## Agenda

### Wednesday, May 13, 2015

7:15 p.m.-9:00 p.m. Closed—Briefing of panel

### Thursday, May 14, 2015

7:15 a.m.-4:30 p.m. Open—Review of the MRSEC

5:00 p.m.-6:45 p.m. Closed—Executive Session

6:45 p.m.-8:30 p.m. Open—Dinner

### Friday, May 15, 2015

7:15 a.m.-9:50 a.m. Closed—Executive Session

9:50 a.m.-4:00 p.m. Closed—Executive Session, Draft and Review Report

*Reason for Closing:*                         The work being reviewed during this site visit may include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the MRSEC. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: February 11, 2015.

Suzanne Plimpton,

Acting Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-03171 Filed 2-13-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P